Slashdot Mirror


Fast Track to Fine Wine?

wombatmobile writes "Hiroshi Tanaka, president of Innovative Design and Technology, claims to have perfected a machine that can transform a bottle of just-fermented Beaujolais Nouveau into a fine, mellow wine in seconds. From the article: 'The road, however, won't be an easy one: the company has brought the machine around to Japanese wine producers, restaurants and even sake rice wine and "shochu" sweet potato spirit distillers, but so far only a small shochu maker in southern Japan has agreed to get involved.'

435 comments

  1. Smells like the same old snake oil... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    This seems to be a variation on the theme of enhancing wine tate through the use of magnetic fields, as exemplified by such products as The Wine Clip, Wine Cellar Express, The Perfect Sommelier, and others.

    Being, as I am, an aficionado of cheap wine, this has been a subject of interest for me. Unfortunately, it seems that every 'study' done on the subject that bears out the magnet treatment theory has not been done in a properly rigorous scientific fashion, while any study done in such a fashion fails to find any correlation between treatment by magnetic field and improvement of taste.

    Speaking of properly rigorous scientific studies (or lack therof), from TFA:
    To the untrained palate, a bottle of Beaujolais Nouveau 2005 strained through the machine became a more full-bodied, complex wine. Similar treatment to a Sauvignon Blanc 2004 resulted in a drier aftertaste.
    No mention of any scientific-ish study to determine objectively whether or not the machine has any positive effects. I fear this may just be the same old snake oil all over again.

    Until I see the results of a few double-blind studies on the effects of this device, I'm suspending judgement.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly, the whole wine tasting industry is mostly snake oil anyway. I can't find the link, but sone researchers did a "pepsi challenge" type of test with a group of experienced wine tasters. The result? No two wine tasters reported the same taste, body, or whatever from the same wines. Their repsonses were, in fact, wildly dissimilar.

      Bring back the good old days, when wine had the same social status as lager, thats what I say!

    2. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between normal wine and enchanced/decanted/expensive/fine wine is the same deal. After a certain point, it's all placebo.

    3. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if it works it won't catch on. Wine is like exotic stereo equipment: people are paying for expensiveness.

      If there's a positive effect, then the reason is something other than what they're claiming. The article gives two irreconcilable explanations for what the machine is doing. one of which is wrong and one of which is nonsensical.

    4. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by interiot · · Score: 1

      Anybody that claims "We tried X, and it produced amazing results! Nobody understands the scientific reason behind it, but I sure can tell you it works." is almost certainly peddling snake oil. If something has a profound effect and obviously works, isn't it usually something that's easy to test in the laboratory? And wouldn't it be easy to get research funding for if it's easy to demonstrate? And aren't scientists constantly looking for the next big thing to boost their career? So where is the flock of scientists then?

    5. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GimliGloin · · Score: 1

      Cool idea but can they compete with Two Buck Chuck? GSG

    6. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      I know you RTFA, because you quoted from it, but you left out the explanation of how the machine works
      His company's machine is a two-chambered device roughly the size of a stereo. Wine passes through one and tap water passes through the other; a membrane the company has patented separates the two.

      Platinum electrodes provide the juice, driving negative ions - the cause of acidity - from the wine into the water.

      [Your quoted text here]
      and why the resulting wine is better
      On top of a faster production time, electrolyzed wine is healthier because it doesn't oxidize easily and requires no artificial anti-oxidizing agents that are present in almost all wines...
      You took a piece of the article entirely out of context. My reading of your quote is that the author does not have a trained palate, but the wine tasted better to him.

      The fact that wine run through this machine can have the anti-oxidizing agents left out of it should be great news to the industry. Less additives and better taste. Only a someone with a closed mind would find something not to like.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by seifried · · Score: 4, Informative

      John Cleese did a short documentary called "Wine for the confused." Towards the end of it he buys 5 bottles of wine ranging in price from $5 US to several hundred. He puts them in brown paper bags with laters ([A-E])and has 20 odd people try them all (some movie star friends/etc, generally people who supposedly drink a lot of expensive wine). He then asks "which wine did you think was the most expensive one" to which the various people say A, B, D, E, John Cleese then says "I'm not hearing a lot of "C." Turns out that no-one thought the most expensive wine was the best one, in fact several thought the $5 bottle was the best. The moral of the story: wine, like food and coloirs is a matter of individual taste and price often has little bearing on what we truly enjoy. Personally I can't stand Beaujolais, I've tried a few and found every single one utterly repulsive.

      Wine for the Confused (2004) (TV)

    8. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I don't understand is that BN (The type of wine tested) is produced to be drunk immediately. It is already "smooth" before the process that was mentioned even gets to it. In fact, BN doesn't age well at all, and shouldn't be drunk more than a year or two out from bottling...

    9. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Honestly, the whole wine tasting industry is mostly snake oil anyway.

      I once ran across - in an upscale liquor shop, no less- a brand of wine which was called "Cheap White Wine". My palate isn't sophisticated enough to comment on the wine's body, aroma, etc., but said wine was indeed white, was indeed cheap, and the label was printed on something which resembled a paper bag in both texture and color.

      Naturally, I had to buy it. If nothing else, everyone got a laugh out of it, and it was refreshing to see that truth in advertising does exist.

    10. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I know you RTFA, because you quoted from it, but you left out the explanation of how the machine works

      The explanation of how the machine works isn't germane to the discussion at hand: whether or not the machine actually improves the taste of wine.

      You took a piece of the article entirely out of context. My reading of your quote is that the author does not have a trained palate, but the wine tasted better to him.

      Perhaps you feel that because you didn't really understand the 'context' of my post. Here's the relevant part again:
      Unfortunately, it seems that every 'study' done on the subject that bears out the magnet treatment theory has not been done in a properly rigorous scientific fashion, while any study done in such a fashion fails to find any correlation between treatment by magnetic field and improvement of taste.
      Specifically, all the 'tests' mentioned on the product websites consist of something like 'here, now try the wine that's been treated by the $MAGNETDEVICE'. And lo and behold, the treated wine does taste better, because that what the testers were expecting. Past a certain point very early on, all perceived differences in wine taste are totally subjective anyway (as mentioned several other times in this discussion), so it doesn't take much to sway tasters' opinions, especially if the study isn't done in a properly rigorous fashion. The passage I quoted from TFA falls squarely into this context.

      The fact that wine run through this machine can have the anti-oxidizing agents left out of it should be great news to the industry.

      Again, even if this claim is true, it's entirely outside of the central claim of better taste. Hiroshi Tanaka isn't trying to market a device that eliminates the need for anti-oxidizing agents, he's trying to market a device that improves the taste of wine. This is the claim I addrressed in my OP. Quit trying to change the subject.

      Only a someone with a closed mind would find something not to like.

      Only a someone completely lacking the ability to think critically would blindly accept Hiroshi's claims at face value.
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    11. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by eh2o · · Score: 2, Informative

      After a certain point, it's all placebo.

      However some scientific studies have found that placebos can have the same effects as the real deal... its one of the great mysteries of the human bodi. So where does that leave us? Maybe it really *does* enhance the flavor to know that its an expensive wine. Maybe its even worth it!

    12. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by eh2o · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The funny thing is, I happen to know people who work in the wine production industry, and I can tell you that this mumbo-jumbo isn't far off from how wine chemistry actually works. They put all sorts of bizarre and random junk in wine, and not always with clear reasons for doing so.

      Note that the wine industry has also lobbied heavily to obtain exemption from ingredient labeling requirements which almost every other product is subject to. They don't want you to know what is in there...

    13. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      1. This isn't a magnetic treatment. It's actually qualitatively different from a magnetic treatment.
      2. Anti-oxidizing agents affect taste, as do preservatives.
      3. I wasn't addressing that close-minded comment @ you
      4. My critical thinking skills are quite fine, thank you. I take his claims at face value, because I don't have any contradicting information.
      Comparing a de-ionizer to a magnet is bogus, and leading everyone else to think the same is shady. That's why I didn't find your commentary terribly insightful. I agree that rigorous studies are needed to validate the claims, but to automatically dismiss this as a magnetic treatment is a rookie move.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    14. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Actinide · · Score: 1
      I couldn't agree more on the "let's see a few double-blind studies" thing, but I think equating it with magnetic snake oil might be a little unfair. It is hard to glean much from TFA, but this bit:
      His company's machine is a two-chambered device roughly the size of a stereo. Wine passes through one and tap water passes through the other; a membrane the company has patented separates the two. Platinum electrodes provide the juice, driving negative ions - the cause of acidity - from the wine into the water.
      Implies something at least a little less implausible. Driving ions through a (say) Teflon membrane between counter-flowing fluids as described should be quite possible. What is unclear to me though is how that might in any way make a nicer wine (e.g. how are all the molecules we don't want in the wine actaully ionised, wthout also ionising any of the many molecules that we do want to see in a fine wine?)
    15. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people don't like knowing about the insect content of their wine.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    16. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by zcat_NZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of my favorite wines is "Purple Death" It's really nice stuff, strong and fruity, almost a liqueur like blackberry nip. I've also heard good things about Cat's Pee on a Gooseberry Bush although I haven't tried it yet. Definately intend to pick up a bottle somethme though!

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    17. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      People buy wine, cheap and expensive, because they like the way it tastes. You can get great $5 bottles if you taste around.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    18. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      But only as much as putting it into a green glass would. How much does the green glass cost, hmm?

    19. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by AtomicBomb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The product sounds like snake oil to me. The aging of alcohol is a fairly complex chemical process. It is just very hard to preferentially remove one off-flavour by, say, increasing the storage temperature, adding some funny chemical without affect a whole matrix of other related compounds, even for relative simple product like beer... (Well, my info is really from beer brewery where I had worked for a major one before.)

      But, for tasting, human taster are indispensable. In the brewery that I worked for, senior lab techs were trained to taste a certain chemical level in beer. We had controls (say add extra chemical in sub ppm level to beer), regular training (put just x ppm of that chemical to distilled water such that we learnt the difference between the minute changes) and followed standard scientific practice (blinded test). Human regularly outperform the modern $100,000 machines (GC/ HPLC) for compound like diacetyl.

      However, I agree that a lot of the wine "connoisseurs" probably do not know what they are talking about... they just learnt to use big word to foil the crowd.

    20. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by kesuki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      apparently you've never heard of whinoeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whinoes.

      hey sure for your $20,000 bottle of wine you'll never see this stuff used, but for that $2-$5 bottle? very doable.

    21. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, the whole wine tasting industry is mostly snake oil anyway. I can't find the link, but sone researchers did a "pepsi challenge" type of test with a group of experienced wine tasters. The result? No two wine tasters reported the same taste, body, or whatever from the same wines. Their repsonses were, in fact, wildly dissimilar.

      This doesn't mean it's snake oil, it means that different people have different tastes.

      Consider an analogy to movies. Not every review gives every movie that same rating, but that certainly doesn't mean there aren't movies that are considered great by the vast majority and those that are considered terrible.

      I took wines in college and we did a really interesting test during one of the first lectures: we passed around glasses of sugar water of varying concentrations, went through them in order of concentration, and had members of the class raise their hand once they got to a concentration they considered "sweet". The range between the high and low end was very suprising.

      Just like movies, you should find a reviewer who's tastes align with yours.

      Bring back the good old days, when wine had the same social status as lager, thats what I say!

      I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. As far as I see table wine has the same status as your typical beer. Fine wines though, are just that. They cost more to make and are much more rare than a can of Bud. They will ALWAYS have higher social status because of this.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    22. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by topham · · Score: 1

      I dislike virtually every wine I have ever tasted. (just to get my bias out of the way).

      My parents recently took a wine appreciation course. When describing a win there was little push for the descriptions to be based on anything particular. The fact is, any wine can taste quite different to different people.

      It was quite possible by the end of the course for most of the people to identify which family of wines they appreciated the most. My mother has one particular family of wines she likes, while my father is a little more broadminded. They both commented that the price of the wine had little (no) barring on their opinion and I am convinced that most of the issue of expensive wines is nothing more than elitism. (That said, few of the cheap wines age well; and I could see how that should effect the price).

      Me, I'll stick to Smirnoff Ice (defnitly not a wine:) ; I dislike the taste of Alcohol and it is one of the only things I've tried where the taste of alcohol is subtle enough it doesn't bother me. I'm sure there are a few other drinks where the taste would be acceptable, but sooner or later you have to give up trying and pick one.

    23. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah - you heathen. The Nouveau from 1996 was a particularly good vintage and you should ask for this wherever you go! ;-)

      Del Boy.

    24. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      There was a scandal in Europe in the 1980s, particularly Germany/Austria, where they added glycol (antifreeze) to the wine to bring out the flavor. A lot of experts, unaware, said that the glycol saturated wines had a deeper, mellower flavor or some such nonsense.

      Needless to say, I think 90% of the whole "tasting" industry is pretentious nonsense started to skyrocket the price of certain brands/lines.

    25. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Riddlefox · · Score: 1
      Whinoes
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
      Jump to: navigation, search
      We don't have an article called "Whinoes"

      * Start this article

      Apparently, neither has Wikipedia :)

    26. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      my bad it's not in wikipedia yet, but a whineo is a type of drunk, usually a hobo, who has a preference for cheap wines over the vodkas and whiskeys etc.

      even urban dictionary lacks an entry stuf to do stuff to do!

    27. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Even if it works it won't catch on. Wine is like exotic stereo equipment: people are paying for expensiveness.
       
      Check the demographic; it's being tried out in Japan where people go nuts over the latest techno-fad. I'm suprised the wine makers aren't lined up for it.

    28. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by DupeMaster+Donkey · · Score: 0

      That's why I didn't find [his] commentary terribly insightful.

      He wasn't trying to be insightful, he was just trying to get first post with enough links or quotes from the article to get modded up by people completely lacking the ability to think critically. This guy does this all the time. The problem is that mods don't RTFA before modding up the first post that sounds like the author might have RTFA, whether or not it actually offers any insight in to the subject. In this particular case, the three links to the various magnetic products might seem relavent and informative to someone who hasn't read the article, but I think they are more of a distraction, as they really have nothing to do with the kind of ion exchange dialysis that the article actually refers to. I'll agree that the article is short of scientific detail, so I, too, will suspend judgement, but I don't see how the original (the first, imagine that) post is insightful/informative.

      --
      Persistence is futile. You will be metamoderated.
    29. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      well wikepedia neve read popular science fiction anthologies dating back to the early 1900's and beyond so um yeah, sheesh I'm a geek I know for sure i picked up the defintion from lterature, and i mainly read sci-fi anthologies etc.

      i already posted my definition, it's slang, deragatory, and apparently much out of fashion. which just makes me more of a geek for knowing obsolete slang.

    30. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by LeonGeeste · · Score: 0
      There was a scandal in Europe in the 1980s, particularly Germany/Austria, where they added glycol (antifreeze) to the wine to bring out the flavor.

      Um, that was France, and that was an episode of the Simpsons.

      j/k, you're good, man. I've always felt the same way about wine.

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    31. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      BTW, what few people seem to know is that the whole point of Beaujolais Nouveau is that it is a wine meant to be drank while it's young. E.g. right now the best Beaujolais would be the 2005 one.

    32. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > Platinum electrodes provide the juice, driving negative ions - the cause of acidity - from the wine into the water.

      Umm... acid is H+ (or H3O+) ions. Which are not negative. In fact, they are the exact opposite of negative - positive.

      Snake oil.

      --
      My other car is first.
    33. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      You'll find enough info about it on the net if you google wine and antifreeze.

      This for instance:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_fraud

      "In 1985, diethylene glycol (an anti-freeze) appeared to to have been added as an adulterant by some Austrian producers of white wines to make them sweeter and upgrade the dry wines to sweet wines; production of sweet wines is expensive and addition of sugar is easy to detect. Fortunately, the amount added was not high enough to be toxic except at impossibly high levels of consumption (one would have had to have ingested about 28 bottles per day for two weeks)."

      There were other instances, but 1985 was bit before the Simpsons hit the scene. I'm reminded of that South Park episode where Butters (?) tries to think up of a story only to have had the Simpsons already do it - except that here that's not the case^_^

    34. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is because experienced wine drinkers can taste the complexity and minor nuances of a wine, rather than just the fruit, tannin or alcohol.

      Inexperienced tasters will rate the strongest/most powerful wine ahead of anything more subtle. For example - try a Californian Chardonnay against a Chablis, you will find the inexperienced taster will appreciate the californian, whereas a wine taster like myself will appreciate the complexity and delicateness of the Chablis.

    35. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> Bring back the good old days, when wine had the same social status as lager, thats what I say!

      My friend, I reccomend you try a Goonie Bag. Not only is it cheap (AU $10-12 for 4 litres) but once you're done, you can use it as a pillow.

    36. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The word you're looking for is 'wino': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wino_(slang_term) (Created June 2004)

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    37. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Informative
      One of my old favorites for "Smooth and Mellow" used to be the Beringer reserve but it was pricey (For me) at around $60 a bottle. Pretty much every wine I tried while visiting Romania tasted as good or better to me and ran me in the neighborhood of $3 a bottle. You can't find the Beringer reserve as easily anymore and lately I've been preferring sake as I was getting tired of purple teeth. Now my favorite bottle of sake is from Horin and runs me $27 a bottle at a local liquor store, though a couple of the sushi restaurants around here charge 2 to 3 times as much for it. Horin's great cold and if I'm introducing a sake newbie to sake, it's the stuff I use.

      In general I'd suggest ignoring the wine snobs and trying a few wines on your own, if you're in to that sort of thing. A good wine is one you like. Just be sure to keep notes so you'll remember which ones you like 3 months later when you're shopping for another bottle. Also, since taste is subjective, I find it worthwhile to go back every so often and try some wine you didn't like so much. Sometimes your perspective will have shifted in the intervening time and you'll like it the second time around. Of course, I think the last glass of wine out of the bottle is always much better than the first one if you drink it all at once...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    38. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by smchris · · Score: 1

      Winetasting is an exercise in differences and is anti-modern at its heart considering we want every Whopper and Coke to be identical. We don't have the mindset. You don't have to be a person who methodically categorizes every wine by vintage, region, varietal and chateau but when you buy a chateau wine, appreciating that distinctiveness is part of what you are paying for. If that doesn't interest you, then it is wasted money. Just pay attention to the dominent grape in the blend of particular bottles you like and follow your tastes. Over time you might notice that you prefer one chardonney over a chardonney from a different region or vintage and then you are making a more specific distinction.

      A corollary of distinctiveness is that it might be a distinctiveness you don't find appealing. And that's OK. I remember when the Gallo brothers were alive and one of them related in an interview how they were mulling over what wine to bring up to celebrate the new year and they decided in the end to just drink one of their own because it was something they honestly liked.

      Aside from recognizing the effects of bad weather, various rot, taint and poor storage, I'm not sure there aren't some basics to good taste however. A decade+ aged cabernet is fine thing, but I guess I wasn't paying attention to register how that cough syrup straight from fermentation got trendy a few years ago. I think there is some pretty good agreement about mixing wines with food as well.

      Now if anyone could explain what it is about Australian whites that can invariably give me a headache with only one glass....??

    39. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As with anything else in life expensive doesn't automatically equal best. My goal as a person who enjoys wine is to find wine that I like and is inexpensive. Generally I drink wine costing maybe $10/bottle. There are plenty of good wines to be had for that price.

      I've also had wine costing anywhere from $500-$1000/bottle. Did it taste better than the cheaper ones? The avg drinker would probably say no. Usually what an expensive bottle adds is a range of flavors that change over time as the wine is drank (among other things). It's more of an experience you share with friends than just getting a beer and getting drunk.

      One more thing. Going from a $5/bottle to a $40/bottle is a huge difference in quality and taste that most people will notice. Going from the $40/bottle to the real expensive stuff adds qualities and nuances that the typical person wouldn't even notice or appreciate.

    40. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by cyclopropene · · Score: 1

      Umm... acid is H+ (or H3O+) ions. Which are not negative. In fact, they are the exact opposite of negative - positive.

      You are correct, and it is poorly described in the article, but all acids have what is called a conjugate base, which is the anion (negative ion) that acts as the counterion to the H+. For hydrochloric acid, the counterion is the negatively charged chloride ion, for sulfuric acid, it is sulfate, and for the tartaric acid you'll find in wine (among many others) it is tartarate. If you remove these,
      you remove your acid component. The fate of the H+? Well, if you are passing a large current through
      the wine, which they are, you are likely reducing it to hydrogen which will bubble off as a gas. Not an apatizing thought for something you're going to drink, though!

      --
      Shouldn't you be doing something useful?
    41. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Only if you don't like wine. I drink a LOT of wine, some nice and some cheap. We have a weekly dinner get-together with about 4 bottles of wine, all bagged. We make comments on what we think of the wines (including guessing variety and vintage, as well as cost range), and then unbag them at the end.

      If something tastes a TON better than the others, you'll likely pick it up again in the future. There's no placebo effect, as you didn't know what you were drinking. Sometimes it's the $10 bottle that wins, and sometimes it's the $40 bottle.

      Either way, the taste difference is not imaginary, it's simply not directly related to price.

      That said, I would say that GENERALLY if you go 2x in price, it will taste "better" (depending on your exact likes/dislikes, often more expensive wine become more "varietal" and less easy-drinking). Not every time, and not every comparison, but I'd say the "enjoy-o-factor" of wine vs price of wine follows an upper-right curve, just with a VERY wide scatter.

      If you never drink wine, there's no way to compare. Just as bud light tastes nice the first time you drink (due to it having no taste), and as you mature in taste you like big belgian beers (or whatever variety you like) which taste nasty to the beginner, wine is the same way.

    42. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      Most people don't like knowing about the insect content of their wine.

      As in "Frass Canyon" Vineyards, depicted in the movie Sideways? ("Frass" is a term for insect excrement, and the winery is really Fess Parker, but still. They don't call it bug juice for nothing.)

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    43. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by LardBrattish · · Score: 1
      I've not seen the show but it could be that if the $200 bottle was a bottle of Red wine it was too young to drink & the tannins hadn't settled in which case it would be vile.

      IME (as a white wine drinker) you do get what you pay for. Good wine is a lot smoother & more enjoyable for me. I don't drink often or much so I concentrate on the experience. Leuwin Estate Art Series Chardonnay for example...

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    44. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by shawb · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the last glass of wine out of the bottle is always much better than the first one if you drink it all at once

      You know, I enjoy beligian beers a whole lot (amount, not frequencey) and I often find the same experience where the last one tastes very very good. Oftentimes even a type that I wouldn't like on the first beer. If only I could find some corelation between drinking beer or wine and enjoying things. Hmmm... maybe these drinks have SOMETHING in common that I'm just not grasping.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    45. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by dcam · · Score: 1

      This would not be a surprise. More expensive wines are more of an aquired taste. Cheaper wines are often sweeter and frankly more bland. To the average person this is more enjoyable. There is nothing inherentally wrong with someone enjoying a cheaper wine.

      The same would be true of scotch. Most people (if they don't hate the taste :)) would prefer a blended scotch rather than a single malt. Those who appreciate it more would prefer a single malt.

      --
      meh
    46. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The only response I have to that is... I'm not drinking any fucking merlot!

    47. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've seen several documentaries and TV shows on various cooking shows which also supports the notion that smelling the cork is for those what to look like they know what they are doing...but really don't. The logic goes, since smell will provide some fashion of taste, smelling the cork will tell you if the wine is good...and information about its body. Yet, the whole point of letting a wine breath is 100% contrary to this notion. Simple fact is, the cork is going to absorb the aspects of the wine which most want to hide or get rid of by "breathing." Furthermore, wine is complex enough that its oder actually says little about its taste. Many cheeses follow suit too; smell good, taste bad, smells bad, tastes good.

      Smelling the cork is for those that ignorantly present themselves as smart while proving they are not or they know they are frauds and are trying to look like they have a large penis. The long of the short, smelling the bottle makes more sense than does smell the cork and in the final analysis, only tasting it is going to tell you the critical details; which ultimately is a personal experience.

    48. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I am a fan of certain blended scotch/whiskey, but nothing beats a good single malt when I want to just enjoy my senses... a nice glass of scotch, a deep leather chair, just the right music, a good book, and about 3 hours with no kids :)

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    49. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      I am NOT drinking any FUCKING MERLOT.

    50. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      They cost more to make and are much more rare than a can of Bud. They will ALWAYS have higher social status because of this.

      Actually, most "fine wines" cost more because of the name attached and has little to do with the cost of production. Obviously, cost of production is a factor, but it is not the most significant factor; well, very rarely. Simple fact is, if a "fine wine" maker places ihs/her name on a bottle, they can sell it for more. Why? It's called branding and is commonly done for the ignorant masses in just about every market segment. With wine, it's mostly because so many people like to pretend they are more sophisticated than everyone else, will buy it simply because 1) it's more expensive, and 2) it's bottled by a "fine wine" name.

      Wine tasting IS SNAKE OIL; 100% so. Here's what happens. You get used to tasting specific characteristics of certain types of wine and eventually your brain no longer registers the tastes like you once did. The same is 100% true for vision, smell, and hearing. You then move on to a new wine which offers new flavors (stimulus) that your tongue could not previously discern. It's now a "fine wine" because it's drank by someone that drinks a lot of wine and has effectively neutered part of their taste buds. Repeat and rinse.

      In other words, they are forced to move from good tasting wines to more and more obscure tastes because they drink too much wine. Then, because they drink too much wine, they present themselves as a tasting expert and can only explain the fact that they like their expensive wines and you don't because they have established a taste for fine wines, which others can not hope to appreciate. In reality, either they've brainwashed themselves into liking something that tastes like crap (which is surprisingly easy to do), to feel superior, or they've temporarily killed off part of their sensory development, forcing them to move to crappier and crappier tasting wines in an effort to continue drinking too much wine, while hoping to find some taste that can still reach their brain through their abused buds.

      This is why there is no such thing as "good wine", nor, "complex wine", nor, "sophisticated wine". If there were, a vast majority would be able to agree what exactly what that is via double blind tests; as can be done with good food. And by the way, good food is almost always NEVER complex. Why? Because it hides flavors and almost universally makes people agree that it tastes bad, or certainly not as good.

      Hmmm....maybe I should start a new type of "ultra fine foods", which tastes like crap and when people say they don't like it, I can charge them $200 a plate and simply inform them their pallet isn't sophisticated enough to appreciate the fine and complex flavors of their meal....but they could if they decided they wanted to pretend they knew more then everyone else. Some could then go on to become "ultra fine food" snobs...which the rest of us can laugh at...just like any of us do with "wine snobs". ...please don't tell me you smell the cork...

    51. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by drivekiller · · Score: 1

      But Japanese collectors and hobbyists aren't necessarily interested in the latest techno-toy. I don't know if it is the case today, but I had a girlfriend about ten or so years ago who told me that her father, who owned a auto upholstery business, did a lot of work for people who were restoring old american autos and shipping them to Japan. In similar fashion, my guitar-playing friends at one point were complaining that the price of vintage guitars was being driven up by Japanese collectors.

      If it's important to you to (for example) drink a white and a red from every year since you were born to the present, technology is not going be interesting.

    52. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Feyr · · Score: 1


      Hmmm....maybe I should start a new type of "ultra fine foods", which tastes like crap and when people say they don't like it, I can charge them $200 a plate and simply inform them their pallet isn't sophisticated enough to appreciate the fine and complex flavors of their meal....but they could if they decided they wanted to pretend they knew more then everyone else. Some could then go on to become "ultra fine food" snobs...which the rest of us can laugh at...just like any of us do with "wine snobs". ...please don't tell me you smell the cork...

      someone recently did just that in (i think) new york. you got the "privilege" to pay 200$ for a.. picture of a meal printed on edible paper, which you would then eat as if it was food. the news clipping i saw said it was a real hit! (i can't find the article now, obviously).

    53. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it just makes you more of an idiot for not being able to spell worth a damn.

      Wino. Winos. Christ.

    54. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by dcam · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Just letting it roll over your tongue...

      --
      meh
    55. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I'm really not sure what to say...is this a joke or for real?

    56. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my pure silver audio cables make a world of difference... However, I had some of my buddies over and they said that one of my friends' Bose system sounded just as good as mine, and they thought I was crazy for spending an amount on cables alone that could have bought a new Honda Civic... Can you imagine the gall? Can you?!?!?! Of course, I couldn't let an insult that spiteful go unpunished, so I kicked one of my so called "friends" in the balls, busted the others' nose, and emptied my shotgun into the others' Lexus... Yep, I've come to accept the fact that the average person might not tell the difference, but that won't stop me from throwing a Molotov Cocktail into his house after he says so!

      So, irrigate yourself undauntedly, my good friend with a predilection for expensive vino... Drink on! ...'cause if you don't... WHO WILL?!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    57. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mother's pussy smells like snake oil.

    58. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sweet taste test isn't really applicable to overall taste though is it? The sense of smell doesn't really correlate with the sense of taste (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami), so people who have incredible ability to detect flavours and subtle fragrances might be decidedly average when it comes to determining at what point they can taste simple sugar...

      The variation is interesting though :)

    59. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by peterfa · · Score: 0

      I've read a book by Queer Eye and they talk about the wine selection ritual. When the waitor/waitress hands you the cork, you don't smell the goddamned thing. This goes with what you said. Adding to this, you are supposed to make sure this *is* what you ordered and not some cheap wine to rip you off. You make sure the cork went with the bottle, or something to that effect. You also sample the wine to make sure it's ok, and not a leaky bottle, and thus smells moldy. There is a distrust of the waiter/waitress.

    60. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jollespm · · Score: 1

      For a lot of wines the last glass is the best because the wine has had some time to open up. Decanting a bottle before drinking it will have the same effect so all the glasses would be better.

    61. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by soul_hk · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you are in Australia? .. Leuwin Estate Art Series Chardonnay isn't very easy to find outside of Aus (in my experience anyway)...

    62. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jollespm · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are right, smelling the cork is pretty worthless, however, looking at the cork can sometimes tell you something. It obviously shouldn't be dry or crumbly, and if it looks like the wine has really penetrated the cork, it can be an indication that the bottle is corked. The scent of wet cardboard is a giveaway for a corked wine.

    63. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Bad move. Claiming that wine tasting is 100% snake oil, makes it pretty easily to DISPROVE your claim. So long as enough "wine snobs" agree on even the most basic question, then you are proven wrong. Personally, I'm pretty sure I can tell the difference between Port and Sherry and I suspect that I'm far from alone :)

      Some could then go on to become "ultra fine food" snobs...which the rest of us can laugh at...just like any of us do with "wine snobs". ...please don't tell me you smell the cork...

      One has to wonder what it is you have against those of us who like wine. I hate to break it to you but there ARE good wines and bad wines, good movies and bad movies, good coffee and bad coffee, etc. People typically don't agree on their favorites, as their tastes are somewhat different, but most people would rather have fresh-ground coffee than Folger's crystals.
      Your opinions seem to reflect those of someone with a lot of preconceived notions about people who drink wine, but little knowedge on the subject of wine itself. Personally, I only like certain types of wines, but I'm not crass enough to imply that people who like other types (or don't like wine at all) are idiots.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    64. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Forgive me for not having the fortitude to post this as Anon, but... mod parent up for funny, underrated, or insightful. This pisswater to Dom Perignon article is just like lead to gold from all evidence given.

    65. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White wine sucks, and so does Emacs.

    66. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jollespm · · Score: 1

      Wine tasting IS SNAKE OIL; 100% so. Here's what happens. You get used to tasting specific characteristics of certain types of wine and eventually your brain no longer registers the tastes like you once did. The same is 100% true for vision, smell, and hearing. You then move on to a new wine which offers new flavors (stimulus) that your tongue could not previously discern.

      I'd be curious to see some real evidence to back this up. I've had a fair amount of wine, and my fiancee is a sommelier. She has an excellent nose and sense of taste, and according to your theory, she should only be drinking super exotic expensive stuff. That isn't the case. There IS such a thing as good wine, although good is subjective. I don't like many chardonnays, but they are one of the most popular wines in America and a lot of people think they are good.

      There are such a things as complex and sophisticated wines, but it sounds like either a) you haven't had any, or b) don't have the palate to make the distinction. That isn't meant as an insult, but rather as what you were born with. Some people just don't have as many taste buds. A complex wine can give many flavors and odors, change as it goes across your tongue, or develop as it sits in a glass.

      http://www.cf.ac.uk/biosi/staff/jacob/teaching/sen sory/taste.html#Supertasters

      The bottom line is, if you like it, great, if you don't, find something else. It doesn't matter how much it costs.

    67. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      difficult maybe, but hardly impossible

    68. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting. I brew beer once a month or so and I can tell you that everything I have done that has increased the complexity of my brewing process has had rather sound scientific principles to back them up. I don't know about making wine, but I do know that both processes use water and yeast. And the chemistry of water is quite complex. Home brewing is not an exact science and you can have a wide range of variation just depending on the freshness of something like your hops.

      One of the most challenging aspects of advanced beer brewing is taking XYZ tap water and getting the water chemistry right for what you are doing. Certain chemicals in water can kill your beers head. Others can keep the yeast suspended in the beer longer than normal producing off tastes. The goal is to have a uniform brewing process that can take variations and produce the same tasting beer each and every time. Think of a macro brewer or wine producer. Their goal is to mostly be very consistent in reproducing a very similar taste so that budweiser beer or beringer white whines all have the same taste year after year. To the untrained eye it might seem silly that I used a dash of irish moss in my beer.. yet I have beer two batches of beer with and without a particular thing and it almost always has the effect everyone says it should. So there *IS* a lot of science behind the beer brewing world. I must imagine that for serious wine makers it must be the same. No two years of crops of wine or malt is the same from year to year.. yet the beer changes in taste very little at most macro brewerys. So I am not qualified to make any judgements directly on wine.. yet given the common elements of complexity: water chemistry, plant life, and yeast its sufficient to say that there is a lot you can do to be very methodical and scientific about wine/beer making. The things you want out of both are quite different. Yet they both have a lot in common. I know how much goes into beer brewing.. so I must assume wine is at least as complex. To someone who is not intimately familiar with the specific processes of a particular wine producers situation things may seem haphazard and random. And I would even go so far as to say that any particular wine maker that admits they are doing things without fully understanding the desired affect their actions will have on the fermantation process are making a bad decision in that they have not properly done their research.

      Jeremy

    69. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by volfro · · Score: 1
      Funny you mention this, as I have a similar experience.

      I have a friend who is a sommelier, and she hosts a wine tasting every year, wherein guests bring their wine--whether they make it or buy it--and each bottle is numbered, sampled, and anonymously rated. The one that won last year was actually just a simple, store-bought $12 bottle of wine, though I don't remember the particulars.

      It's funny how much of the wine tasting seems like a racket. So much of it is image; without a doubt, there are 'professional' tasters who love to throw around words like 'bouquet' to convince the uninitiated that they know what they're talking about.

      On the other hand, there are wines that are rated highly across a wide number of tasters. Yellow Tail wine, for instance, is widely renowned for being a delicious, reasonably-priced wine. I'm sure there are other wines that are unanimously delicious (or, for that matter, revolting), regardless of price. There are, in fact, people who know what they're talking about when it comes to 'good' wine or 'bad' wine, despite the fact that such an opinion seems objective (and despite what beer drinkers would have you believe! I beer as much as the next guy, but wine's good too, snobbery and all).

    70. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Even if it works it won't catch on. Wine is like exotic stereo equipment: people are paying for expensiveness.

      So, this is essentially the Bose of wine. When those little bookshelf speakers with the hidden subwoofer first came out, they sounded moderatlely better than other equipment at the same price range, and Bose marketed those tiny speakers like crazy. They weren't (and aren't) the best speakers on the block, but they're good enough that the hype will fool most people into thinking that they're buying the best stereo equipment that money can buy.

    71. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nanio · · Score: 1

      because god knows you can't have an 'experience you share' with friends and beers. the subcontext here regarding the 'average' or 'typical' person is irritating, though, the fool being parted with their $1000 per bottle is more than enough comic humor to compensate. share the wealth, oh ye with too much.

    72. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by joe_adk · · Score: 2, Funny
      Of course, I think the last glass of wine out of the bottle is always much better than the first one if you drink it all at once...

      Thats because you're drunk then. I always find the 10th beer is pretty good too.
    73. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      Even if it works it won't catch on. Wine is like exotic stereo equipment: people are paying for expensiveness.

      To a point, I would agree. My long-time acquantances make some excellent (and somewhat expensive ($40-60/bottle) wine, and have said that it's hard to justify the taste/value of very expensive wine ($150+ per bottle).

      While things have definately gotten more expensive in the world of Oregon wine, an oenophile with a discriminating palate that has basic knowledge of what they're doing (and finds help they can trust), can most definately find a very nice Oregon Pinot Noir in the $30/bottle range--one that would easily compete with wines costing considerably more.

      For sure, one rule is true: a winery with conspicuous reputation for making good wines may very well (after they've gone big) release product lines that aren't terribly good--for the same price. Rex Hill is a good example of this: while some wines are quite good (their Seven Springs and Jacob Hart single-vineyard releases taste very nice to me), some of their other wines aren't. This is a view that has been verified by others who make a living tasting or making wine--or just plain buying it.

      I once read that the French really don't have a word for winemaker, but they definately have one for vine-grower. While I respect the work, artistry and scientific knowledge of good enologists, the real money is made in the viticulture arena. I compared two wines, both made from grapes harvested from the same vineyard: one was $15/bottle, my friend's was $30. Both were extremely good, and from a value standpoint, I'd say the cheaper bottle was outstanding, and similar from a flavor experience.

      People always say that, for most people, there is no difference between a cheap bottle of wine and an expensive bottle. While I think it's fair to except certain flavors in wine that are prized by fewer folks (the barnyard-y flavor imparted by Burgundian Brettanomyces, for instance), I can say that my personal experience explains otherwise. There are diminishing returns for ultra-expensive wine (e.g., Opus One), but I would never gamble that people would generally like a budget wine from Chile or Australia over a well chosen, moderately priced wine from Oregon, Washington and select winemakers in California.

      I can easily say that one of the worst values in wine is clearly in the arena of champagne. I've sampled many expensive champagnes (Cristal and some releases from Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin [VCP]), and overall, I liked samples that were half the cost (Agrapart e Fils stands out strongly). The only exception was the 1990 La Grande Dame from VCP--I'll never forget the flavor and texture of that. If I only had $150 left in my pocket, I'd buy other wines before buying a single bottle of that.

    74. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by ericbg05 · · Score: 1
      I wonder if you are in Australia? .. Leuwin Estate Art Series Chardonnay isn't very easy to find outside of Aus (in my experience anyway)...

      A quick google and I found it's also available in New Jersey. But they don't offer shipping, so you'd have to hike to NJ anyway. I'd rather make the trip to Aus. :/

    75. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. If you're smelling for a scent of wet cardboard that is the result of mold growing in the cork, why isn't it just as effective to smell the cork as it is to smell the wine?

    76. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      actually, that's why the somellier pours out a small amount and presents it to the "head" of the table to check... you're supposed to do a taste test of it before accepting the remainder of the bottle...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    77. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      thanks for the heads up, his name is familiar, but I didn't realize the game he's playing.

      added 'im to my foes list. I might miss out on a few funny comments, but i'll also skip all the crap.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    78. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Ladies and gentlemen, please taste this extract of essence of snake oil and tell me which of A, B, C, D tastes closest to anaconda, boa, green, and rattler. And yes, I have recently recalibrated my snake oil coils to remove congealed frog waste products...

      -------- BTW, I like sake and shoju. I had shoju in Tokyo, but I think shogju was going to knock me on my butt, tho I don't recall liking the taste. And, I like my sake hot or cold. When hot, it's handy to more quickly fall into sleep. (However, once I watched Starship Troopers 2 and I was so unnerved I had to drink 2 or 3 shots of whiskey to go to sleep. Funny part was when all those aliens were gutting and siphoning off human extract, my friend and his wife were cracking and sucking the meat out of crabs he'd caught earlier in the day. Obviously, could watch the aliens do their thing while he ate his own crab meat.)

      word image: floater

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    79. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by BJH · · Score: 1

      No joke - the restaurant is Moto, in Chicago. See here for details.

    80. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      About champagne, have you considered sparking wine from california (or other domestic parts of the world)? While I can't speak much for sparkling wines that cost >$100, I find that the best value sparkling wines I can get can be $20-40 are from california. The only reason I would buy expensive (such as Dom, Krug or Grand Damme) would be stricly to impress the would be in-laws or other people that really have no idea other than brand recognition. :-P

    81. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by JPyun · · Score: 1

      You mean Soju?

    82. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by soul_hk · · Score: 1

      which is actually what I did in December ... Sydney in Summer is heaven! and besides, i don't live in the USA.

    83. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some little white pills I'd like to sell you.

    84. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Bring back the good old days, when wine had the same social status as lager, thats what I say!

      I dunno. Around where I am (flyover country...) I've been to many parties where the choice is Bud vs. Miller. The wine equivalent would be Kool-Aid vs. Gatorade...

    85. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by giorgosts · · Score: 1

      It's like Cola, cofee, tobaco or alcoholic beverages. You are accustomed to some specific flavor, and your report of others is how they deviate from that.

    86. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      No two wine tasters reported the same taste, body, or whatever from the same wines. Their repsonses were, in fact, wildly dissimilar.

      This doesn't mean it's snake oil, it means that different people have different tastes.


      If everyone has different tastes and you've no guarantee that a $100 bottle will be better than a $5 bottle, then the prices on wines are meaningless. Since those prices are determined by reputation which is determined by wine tasters, wine tasting is snake oil.

      Consider an analogy to movies.

      Movies all cost the same, so that analogy weakens your argument.

    87. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      It says acidity. Acids are always ionized because the H+ ion splits off so the remainder has a negative charge.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    88. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nettdata · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmmm... seems like you're an idiot. ;)

      Actually, I routinely smell the cork of a bottle to see if it's been "corked". A "corked" bottle of wine is one that suffers from TCA contamination, which is most likely to come from the cork. (It can come from other sources, but those are very rare).

      Basically, a "corked" bottle of wine tends to smell very musty, and smelling the cork will tell you right away if it is "corked".

      The biggest "show" of wine drinkers are those that swirl the wine around the glass and make a big show of holding the wine up to the light and laboureously tasting the wine in front of the server... all you really have to do is give it a quick swirl and then smell it. That will tell you all you need to know when it comes to sending it back or keeping it.

      Anything else you do with a glass of wine (swirling, etc) is pretty well for the wine-snobs that want to classify the wine and analyze it in more depth, or to look like you think you know what you're doing.

      "Corking" is also a primary reason for real cork being replaced by synthetics. For that matter, there's a movement to switch to screw-caps as they provide a much better seal with none of the drawbacks of cork (drying out, turning, etc).

      On top of that, some older wines taste like absolute shit unless they're allowed to "breathe" for a while. An hour or more in a decanter will result in a drastically different taste, finish, etc., in most cases.

      It's amazing how much people "learn" from watching some stupid episode of Fraser or a movie. For instance, there was a marked 30% drop in the sale of Merlot after Sideways came out.

      At the end of the day, the only thing to remember about wine is that if YOU like it, then it's good. Price, vintage, varietal, etc., has absolutely nothing to do with it. People just tend to feel pressured into buying expensive wines and doing stupid human tricks at the table for fear of looking stupid.

      Personally, I'm a big Barossa Valley shiraz fan, but I've been pleasantly surprised by a nice Meritage now and then. :P

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    89. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by chicagotypewriter · · Score: 1
    90. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Bad move. Claiming that wine tasting is 100% snake oil, makes it pretty easily to DISPROVE your claim.

      Bzzzt. Straw man. S/he never claimed it was 100% anything. Obviously we can tell wine from grape juice, but you still have to explain why wine tasters can't reliably tell a $5 bottle from a $100 bottle.

    91. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I was wondering that, too.

      Also, I once had an experience of drinking a Chateau Labegorce (a decent Cru Bourgois) followed by a Chateau Latour (1er cru) the following day. The Latour was from a poor year, and the Labegorce from 1990. The Labegorce was a considerably better wine, but I am sure that the Latour cost more.

      I do generally agree about paying for wine, though. I'm more a red drinker, myself, but if you can find some, check out Cloudy Bay Sauvignon Blanc. Utterly brilliant, and in the UK, about £15-20 ($25-30) a bottle.

    92. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      One thing with decanting is that the process of moving the wine from one receptacle to another introduces air into the wine. I've read that people opening a bottle and leaving it to breathe that way is mostly pointless as only a small amount of the wine will get the air.

    93. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In France, Beaujolais is in the $5 bottle category.

    94. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by StoatBringer · · Score: 1

      James Randi ( http://www.randi.org/ ) has been offering his million dollar prize for evidence of the paranormal to the people selling "magnetic wine aging" gadgets for some time. Oddly enough, none of them seem willing to take the money by showing that their wotsit does what they claim it can.

      --
      Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
    95. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Good wine is what you like. Whether it's an '82 Margaux or a £4 ($6) bottle of Romanian Pinot Noir.

      Personally, though, the best bottles I've ever had have been expensive bottles. That doesn't mean every expensive bottle has been earth-shattering, because some have been disappointing.

    96. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by typical · · Score: 1

      Why? It's called branding and is commonly done for the ignorant masses in just about every market segment.

      Just look at the automobile market. :-)

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    97. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

      A good wine is one you like.

      Peasant!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    98. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      No, shochu, but they're similar.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    99. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this device is at all like the magnetic systems you cite. They might have similar effects, who knows. But it's different snake oil. FTA:

      "His company's machine is a two-chambered device roughly the size of a stereo. Wine passes through one and tap water passes through the other; a membrane the company has patented separates the two. Platinum electrodes provide the juice, driving negative ions - the cause of acidity - from the wine into the water."

      This system appears to be using some sort of electrolysis / osmosis to move certain components of the wine into water (the anti-Jesus effect?!). Article also claims that components remaining in the wine are affected as well: by removing oxygen, the alcohol and water mix more completely. This is what apparently alters the taste.

    100. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by somersault · · Score: 1

      It's kinda of obvious that your 'average' person these days doesnt drink much wine though. When I first started drinking even wine and beer tasted similar to me, until I got used to the taste of the alcohol. Then every beer tasted the same to me, again until I got used to the general taste of beer. Obviously someone who drinks a lot of wine is going to be able to tell the differences better, it's not like this guy is trying to declare all wine drinkers as a higher class of person who should one day rule the world and crush the beer drinkers beneath his heel.

      I got a couple of bottles of wine from work at Christmas, should really open them up sometime >_>

      --
      which is totally what she said
    101. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Snake oil or not, there is science behind the way it works. Trapping alcohol molecules in clusters of water molecules seems like it would mellow out a wine.

      I make my own homebrew wine. It takes two weeks to a month or so to ferment, and about six months to become drinkable (though I quite like it young and rustic, most people don't). It then takes ANOTHER six months to become really good.

      I'd like to buy one of these devices just to see what it can do to my product. I'd also like to try it on 'Chick Drink' (A party drink in which gatorade powder is rehydrated with 50-50 everclear and sprite) - which is almost undetectable as alcohol - to see if it makes it COMPLETELY undetectable as alcohol.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    102. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Peasant!

      Elitist!

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    103. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Until I see the results of a few double-blind studies on the effects of this device, I'm suspending >judgement.

      Not on this specific device, but one has been conducted on the general principle :

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/badscience/story/0, ,1656827,00.html

      Same guy is now calling for a trial on expensive hi-fi power cables.

    104. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      If it can make the case (or what's left of it) of the rather syrupy 2004 McLaren Vale shiraz I paid a whole $A6 per bottle for, I want one. Otoh, it'll probably be cheaper to leave the remaining 9 bottles for a couple more years (or use them for cooking). At that, it's already better than the Chateau Cardboard I usually cook with.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    105. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Fucking chardonnay! Only poofters and sheilas drink white wine - fuck subtlety, get a decent Coonawarra shiraz into youself. Or a beer. (My apologies if you happen to be either same-sex oriented or female.)

      To be honest, I do like botrytis-infected whites as a dessert wine in summer (but I prefer port in the winter). But I'm not a poofter, no, no, no.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    106. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      The first time I recall tasting any Beaujolais Nouveau (over 40 years ago - I must have been about 13, and pretentious with it), my mum's new boyfriend (who taught French at the university) brought a bottle of frog wine around and, having only tasted well-aged South Australian shiraz and cab-sav based wines at that stage (her previous boyfriend was a bit of a wine wanker), I said, "It's a bit young." (These days, I reckon if you chilled a Beaujolais a bit, it'd be nice at a barbie. A good grease-cutter.)

      Mum actually agreed (later and in private) that she thought it was a tad thin, too. Ah, the arrogance and certainty of youth! How I miss it.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    107. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Do youself a favour. A decent merlot is great with roast lamb. Or grenache, that's OK too.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    108. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 1

      I have heard so much about Beaujolais being such a great wine over the years that I finally broke down and bought a 14.00 bottle last week. I ended up mixing it with 7-up for spritzers, it was super dry and simply not to my taste. Of course everyone have different tastes. I prefer any Lambrusco or wine with a fuller, less dry, fruit flavor, I also prefer a bit of sweetness to take the edge off the acidy tartness of most white wines.

      --
      Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"
    109. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is actually not true. Just think about the times you've had to poke that last beer down with a stick.

      On a more serious note, my uncle (who, like one of my mum's boyfriends (see earlier post) is a bit of a wine wanker) got it right on one Christmas binge I recall (dimly). I was under the illusion that if we drank the _really_ _exceptionally_ _good_ red he brought first, then got stuck into the comparatively second-rate stuff I had later, it'd be OK. He suggested that we'd be better off graduating to the good stuff. He was right, I was wrong. (Disclaimer - we were both staggering-drunk at the point we agreed he was right and I was wrong (there'd been a fair bit of beer earlier in the day). I hated that. Fucker's always right. He's a lawyer.)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    110. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straw man yourself. If you all you want is to make a wine drinker look like a fool it is indeed possible to pick one very good cheap wine and some expensive ones that could do the trick. But you have to know quite a bit about wine to pick the right ones. I'm pretty sure you couldn't do it. You pick 9 bottles at $100 and one for $5. If i cant tell the $5, i take the bill. :D

    111. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by infolib · · Score: 1
      even for relative simple product like beer

      Is beer really that simple? I like sampling different beers when I have the chance, and the range of tastes found wildly exceeds that of wine (only occasional wine-drinker) I'd expect brewers to have just as subtle discussions as vintners.

      I don't mind beer being simple, I'll drink it anyway for sure, but I'm wondering, what part of your job gave you that impression?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    112. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Sydney in summer is vile. It rains all the time, but without the charm of Darwin.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    113. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      My mum (being a sheila, she drinks white wines) reckons the Cloudy Bay Sav Blanc is OK. It's from New Zealand, isn't it?

      It's heaps cheaper than that here, btw. If you like wine, move to Australia.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    114. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, smelling the cork will tell you whether or not the wine is corked. If the cork smells mouldy, the wine will be, at best, inferior. Smelling the bottle, otoh, will tell you very little immediately after it's opened.

      People who know nothing about wine may well snuffle at the cork, but they don't know why they should.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    115. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm .... Barossa Shiraz. (drools)

      I'm just finishing off the second bottle (actually, the first one was only a third left from last night, so it's not _quite_ as bad as it sounds ... ) of Barossa Cab-Merlot blend - quite cheap, but yummy. Scew cap. I wish everyone would use them, much better than corks.

      Why would you live anywhere that wasn't an hour's drive from the Barossa Valley?

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    116. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by aborchers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "For instance, there was a marked 30% drop in the sale of Merlot after Sideways came out."

      Heh. I also noticed that my neighborhood BJ's, which prior to that movie had exactly one Pinot Noir in regular stock, now has about fifteen varieties.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    117. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      This is probably going to sound a bit elitist and patronising, but that's not my intention. Generally, young people prefer sweeter drinks (including wine). As you get older, your palate matures, and you start to prefer dryer wines and those with more complex flavours. (This applies to both beer and wine, btw.)

      Give it a couple of years. While Beaujolais might not float your boat now, try a good dry red wine from any of the great wine-producing countries. (I know there are good wines from Australia, France, Spain and Italy, but I know nothing about California.)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    118. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      ... sittin' on the beach drinkin' rocket fuel, oh yeah .... cheap wine and three day's growth ...

      $A10 for 4 litres is not even fit for cooking with. Must be fucken Paddle Wheel or Kaiser Stool or something.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    119. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Threni · · Score: 1

      The claim:
      > Honestly, the whole wine tasting industry is mostly snake oil anyway.

      The proof:

      > I can't find the link, but sone researchers did a "pepsi challenge" type of test
      > with a group of experienced wine tasters. The result? No two wine tasters
      > reported the same taste, body, or whatever from the same wines. Their repsonses
      > were, in fact, wildly dissimilar.

      Non sequitor. You could apply the "test" with music, computer games etc and come up with a result that's exactly as useful as the above.

    120. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      No. It isn't. There is an objective difference between good wine and bad wine, but some people are less fastidious than others. Thus, Kaiser Stuhl still has a market.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    121. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Or rummy ...

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    122. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      That's right, it's from NZ. It's something like £17-20 a bottle here, and quite rare. Most merchants will only sell something like 2 bottles per customer.

      I'm sure there are other good ones, but I don't get much chance to drink excellent sauvignons. Normally, I find them a little too sharp, but Cloudy Bay has enough fruit to make it delicious.

    123. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt. Straw man. S/he never claimed it was 100% anything.

      Actually they did. Try reading posts before making such silly comments.

      Here's the direct quote: "Wine tasting IS SNAKE OIL; 100% so."

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    124. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Shit. 20 quid is like $A50. I'd never pay more than about $A25 for a Sav Blanc here. (Well, I probably wouldn't even pay that much unless I wanted to impress my mum.) I'd be unhappy paying that much for a drinkable claret.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    125. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      I want the Beaujolais Nouveau to taste like Beaujolais Nouveau and not like a 40+year old wine. That is why we have Beaujolais Nouveau parties every year in the thursday the wine is released.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    126. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lush might also be an appropriate term.

    127. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by dmatos · · Score: 1

      People at the Niagara College School of Hospitality and Viniculture have designed a brand new machine to shake the ladybugs out of bunches of grapes. Really. Apparently, the cyclical population boom of ladybugs resulted in some years that were completely undrinkable, when too many got into the wine.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    128. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by fir5t+psot! · · Score: 1

      Of course. What did you expect? Wine is like music. You can talk about it in academic terms, but ultimately the whole experience comes down to one or two questions, i.e., (1) did you like it, and (2) did you like it for the money? The whole trick to enjoying wine is to identify one or two wine critics you mostly agree with and use them as a starting point for purchasing wine. If you like the results, ignore everyone else.

    129. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... seems like you're an idiot. ;)

      LOL!

      Let me get this straight....you do a snobbish ritual that makes you look silly and then you do the only thing that matters....smell and taste the wine it self! Since no one with half a brain is going to send back a bottle based soley on the oder of a cork...those that smell the cork are truly ignorant or a dumb ass. This is a factually based statement as it's been proven time and time again based on taste tests. Only the ignorant or egotistical elitist believes the cork has any value as it relates to taste or quality of wine.

      At the end of the day, the only thing to remember about wine is that if YOU like it, then it's good. Price, vintage, varietal, etc., has absolutely nothing to do with it. People just tend to feel pressured into buying expensive wines and doing stupid human tricks at the table for fear of looking stupid.

      Which means...wine experts are for no body...yet it doesn't stop idiots from listening to these dummies. I completely agree with this assertion!

    130. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I've had a fair amount of wine, and my fiancee is a sommelier. She has an excellent nose and sense of taste, and according to your theory, she should only be drinking super exotic expensive stuff.

      That simply implies you're not driven to be elitist and/or your ego is in check. Meaning...you drink for the simple pleasure of a simple wine rather than trying to climb a social ladder. Nothing in my statement excludes the possibility that one may simply enjoy a glass of wine. The difference being, a good glass of wine is a personal experience. Your good is not my good is not Mr. Smith's good...yet "wine experts" make the effort to imply those that don't enjoy THEIR wine are simply not sophisticated enough in their brain or pallent. Hmmm....LOL...seems I just read someone ignorantly pushing that crap...LOL! Seriously...I'm laughing here! Thank you. :)

      There are such a things as complex and sophisticated wines, but it sounds like either a) you haven't had any, or b) don't have the palate to make the distinction.

      Thanks....I needed a good laugh to start my day. LOL! Change in temp or airiation does not a complex wine make. LOL! LOL! You want to try my complex water while you're at it! LOL!

      Brainwashed beyond redemption!

      Seriously....try bothering to find the real experters which study taste and yes...even wine...this is not my theory...and thus far, as far as the theory of wine and taste goes, it's the only truism which is supported by double blind taste tests. If you want to imagine anything else, please go ahead...I'm sure not stopping you. After all, laughter is a gift to the world. And there is nothing wrong with that.

    131. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Your opinions seem to reflect

      Like everything you said, you're 100% incorrect. This is not "my opinion". This is fact. There is no lack of documneted information on the information I've provided. Surprisingly, much of this is coming from the wine industry its self...well, those that are trying to show the world how much snake oil there is in wine tasting. Saying I'm wrong is simply ignoring the only scientifically supported facts that exist within the world of wine tasting. Which ultimately....proves the masses have been brainwashed and will blindly march ahead rather than admit they look silly doing their blind, marching, dance.

    132. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      This only shows you have no capacity for critical thinking...which is not surprising if you're trying to tote the wine tasting party line. I said nothing that precludes people can agree and broad taste characteristics. Having said that, even the experts can not agree on what it is that they are tasting in these "too complex for the simpleton pallet" wines. Long of the short...the reason they can't agree is because they don't exist.

      Find a wine YOU like and enjoy it. Ignore what everyone else has to say about odd taste, flavors, complex pallets, etc...and you'll be both smarter and happier.

    133. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Which tells us nothing other than you've been brainwashed. Ignore the stupid cork! Taste the wine. Did you like it? No? Send it back! Enjoyed it? Keep drinking. Is that really that hard?

    134. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Considering the "experts" can't do it...you'd be taking the bill. Period.

    135. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Which can be done without getting a cork anywhere near ones face. :)

    136. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Which is why the bottle should be uncorked at the table or within sight. Smelling the cork provides nothing.

      Besides, if you have that much distrust...who's to say the label hasn't been switched.

    137. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jollespm · · Score: 1

      It isn't necessarily mold growing in the cork, but the cork being porus and allows oxygen into the bottle that spoils the wine. I should have specified like advocate one did that you smell/taste the little bit of wine that is first poured out into the glass.

    138. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Why, the hoi polloi don't even like John Cage! Just because his music sounds like crap! Can you imagine?

      Somedays, it's hardly worth getting out of bed and putting one's nose in the air!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    139. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Smelling the cork is for those that ignorantly present themselves as smart

      But, isn't that the whole point of drinking rancid grape juice in the first place? I mean, if someone wants to get hammered, why wouldn't they just have a shot of Jack Daniel's?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    140. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by jollespm · · Score: 1

      Change in temp or airiation does not a complex wine make.

      I didn't say that every wine will change with temp or time, but, often better wines will develop different, better, more exciting, etc. flavor as it sits. A simple wine can taste flat, leave no finish, and not change flavor as you swallow it. A complex wine can do just the opposite. It can have a multi-layered taste where you get the fruit first, then you might get oak or tobbacco, and then something different on the finish. Complex does not necessarily mean good or bad, it is simply a way to describe way how a wine tastes. This is speaking from my own experience, I don't read wine magazines, or pay attention to what anyone else says.

    141. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Most definitely. There are even "aerators" (sp?) that can be used to maximize the exposure to air as it is poured into a decanter. That is also why most decanters usually have a very large base to them, so that it exposes the most amount of surface area of wine to the air.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    142. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, if the cork is off (musty, moldy smell) I won't taste the wine.

      Usually, when the server brings and uncorks the wine, they hand it to you while they get ready to decant the wine. It takes 2 seconds to smell the cork. This isn't taking any time out of the process, is not some snobby ritual, etc. It is something you can do that provides you useful information about the wine, while waiting for the wine to be provided. It's not some fancy "snobbish" ritual

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    143. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      About champagne, have you considered sparking wine from california (or other domestic parts of the world)? While I can't speak much for sparkling wines that cost >$100, I find that the best value sparkling wines I can get can be $20-40 are from california.

      I've heard many good things about Methode Champagnoise (sp?) made in California, but haven't really had a chance to try them.

      One of my favorite sparkling wines to drink with dessert is an Italian prosecco. About $9-12/bottle.

    144. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Altus · · Score: 1


      ah to have mod points.... well said and really funny! mod this UP.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    145. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      hey well i can spell at least as good as the slashdot editors! isn't that good enough?

    146. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bahumat · · Score: 1

      I'd strongly recommend a Piersporter Riesling, ideally green label, for a white. For a red wine, Hardy's Stamp of Australia Shiraz (or really, anything by Hardy's that's pure shiraz, not a blend of Shiraz Cabernet-Sauvignon). These two are the ones I've had the most success with when it comes to "You don't like wine? Give this a quick taste!" and converting another person over into grudgingly admitting they've found a wine they like. ;)

      --
      "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
    147. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Nope, no brainwashing, just observation.

      A lot of very good wines (particularly reds) don't taste too good straight out of the bottle, so sniffing the cork is a very reliable way of detecting cork-taint. Sometimes slightly corked wines are still drinkable, just not as stunning as the other bottle you had from the same case. (I must admit I don't do it in restaurants because it seems pretentious, but I often do it at home.)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    148. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      It is just very hard to preferentially remove one off-flavour by, say, increasing the storage temperature, adding some funny chemical without affect a whole matrix of other related compounds, even for relative simple product like beer...

      What makes you think beer is simple? Winemaking is far simpler: crush grapes, let ferment. Maybe some racking, then bottling. You can even rely on the wild yeasts to do the fermentation for you. With beer, you've got: mill grain, mash grain (you could write a whole book just on this part), sparge the mash, boil wort, add hops, chill quickly, pitch yeast, let ferment. Then racking, maybe dry-hopping, priming and bottling.

      If you meant that beer is aesthetically simpler than wine, maybe you're just lacking the tasting experience. Even if you want to reduce everything down to the spectrum of fermentation byproducts, beer is chemically just as complex as wine, in that it contains hundreds of different esters, diketones, and alcohols. Many of the same compounds show up in both beverages.

    149. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I can't find the link, but sone researchers did a "pepsi challenge" type of test with a group of experienced wine tasters. The result? No two wine tasters reported the same taste, body, or whatever from the same wines. Their repsonses were, in fact, wildly dissimilar.

      Well, that's really not surprising. People have a hard time describing something as subjective as wine in objective terms. However, that doesn't imply there is no difference between the wines. I can't explain to you what the colors red and blue look like, but they're different.

      A quality wine is one that you enjoy, that is very true. Price has very little to do with it. But you seem to be implying that anybody who claims to be able to differentiate wine is full of shit. That's clearly not the case.

      Bring back the good old days, when wine had the same social status as lager, thats what I say!

      The "social status" of wine is in the eye of the beholder. If you think that a glass of fine red wine in your hand somehow promotes you to "hoi polloi" standing, you're deluding yourself.

      By the way, are you aware that in Europe, ale is widely viewed as "primitive" in comparison to lager? It's possible to be elitist about just about anything.

    150. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Most people don't like knowing about the insect content of their wine.

      There are wines with an insect content of 100%.

    151. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by riprjak · · Score: 1

      Hmm... interesting point of view except that AFAIK top viticulturalists locally (Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; you know, where the best red wines in the world are made ;) can identify from tasting the general region of the vinyard which grew the fruit; and such tastings are ALWAYS carried out as "pepsi challenges". Of course, these are guys which taste wine during the fermenting process; which takes a cast iron stomach... so they may not be average people...

      Either way, whilst it IS possible to produce mature, full bodied wine in an accelerated timeframe; it is NOT possible IMHO to age a wine to a drinkable state automagically; not without actually adding chemicals... we DONT do that to our wines (well, small ammounts of preservative are permitted, but all additives must be clearly noted on the bottle), except for casks; but goon isnt really wine.

      Now, the Adelaide University (IIRC) has developed techniques to allow full bodied Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon to peak in 3~5 years; whilst they are inferior to wines made in the usual way which peak in 7~10 years, they are still drinkable. Mostly it comes down to the fruit, if you are using fruit from a 140 year old Shiraz vine (wood is perhaps a more accurate term for grapes like this), there is nothing other than slow aging that will mellow the wine without nasty side effects... oh! wait, those fools in Europe kept fighting wars over their best vinyards, so they dont have any vines that old, how would they know??... :)

      Either way, Red wines still need to age in oak to develop their character, or you end up with pale, light swill without body, may as well drink white wine. So, when bottled they will be 2~3 years old anyway; but still, I would take alot of convincing that you could add another 2 years to it with any kind of machine that doesn't involve treating or diluting it with chemicals.

      I suppose you could just filter out the solids and make it smoother... wouldnt help the character though. Besides, thats what decanters are for...

      Oh yeah, here in Oz, wine and beer have the same social status ;) well, wine and ale's to be accurate; a tallk frosty glass of Coopers Pale Ale sits very well next to a fine glass of Hill of Grace... Course, I always knew Australia was the side of the fence on which the grass is greener /parochial :)

      Just my $0.02
      err!
      jak.

    152. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by zytheran · · Score: 1

      "trapping alcohol molecules in cluster of water molecules" ...WTF?
      To the best of any scientists knowledge water has never been seen to "clump".
      Water molecules are all the same, that's why they are "molecules".
      That would be year 8 science.
      Same concept applies to any talk of "imprinting" on water.
      This is the sort of science called 'psuedo-science' or pure BS.

    153. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by peterfa · · Score: 0

      Good point,
      I think that looking at the cork proves that the label hasn't been switched. The cork has stuff written on it so you know what bottle went with it.

    154. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Actually typical is correct. I'm don't drink a lot of beer so I'm not a typical beer drinker. Because of that I have a hard time tasting the difference between whatever beer I'm drinking and any other beer. Take someone who drinks more beer than the typical person and they will be able to tell you what beer they like and why.

      Not sure why all the hate. Doing unique things is what life is all about. Sharing that time with friends just makes the experience that much better. I'm sure you have things that you splurge on that I could make fun of you just as easily. You spent how much on a video card? How much on your surround sound stereo? How much on your pr0n collection?

    155. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I'm going to assume you posted your comment from a computer with a P100 with 16mb of ram from the command line. Because really, anything else is just splurging...

    156. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by soul_hk · · Score: 1

      it very rarely rains! I have lived in Sydney for my first 21 years or so, the only rain in summer comes after a scorching hot day.. at which point you gladly welcome its cooling effect!

    157. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by modecx · · Score: 1

      No, actually, I posted that comment using a Commodore C64C hooked up to Ethernet using a combination of custom hardware and software, but nothing too luxurious, as I typically enjoy reading and posting to slashdot using nothing more than the standard GET and POST methods, of course, by manual entry into a custom hacked telnet client... I also enjoy the fact that /.'s html looks like shit, but because I'm that masochistic on Sundays.

      On Mondays I afford myself the luxury of using this BeBox I pulled out of a dumpster, but I try not to splurge, so it's just the 66Mhz model, and I use my standard telnet method, but I also afford myself the little luxury of multiple terminals via the window interface.

      Sanity! You're a madman! Can't we all just get along?!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    158. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      You may be correct in general. I spent the summer of 1976-7 in Sydney, and it was pretty fucking wet. As I implied, I prefer Darwin (better atmosphere and much more interesting people). In the Wet, you've been working through a hot, humid bastard of a day and (you can set your watch by it) at about 1800 it just buckets down and chills everything off very nicely. OTOH, my shoes went mouldy.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    159. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Just FYI...more and more, new type (well, actually both synthetic cork and treated cork) of cork is being used which prevents the musty and moldy oders by preventing the mold in the first place. This has been going on for years and is becoming more and more common. Why? Because even the wineries agree the cork says nothing. In fact, many have tried moving to a completely alternate and fully synthetic form of cork yet many traditionalist drinkers baulked at the notion, forcing them to move back to a more expensive and less reliable, traditional cork....which is still often treated.

      So who are you going to believe? Scientist? The winery? Or some guy that was taught, based on old wives tale, who taught another guy, so on and so on, who taught you? Personally, I'll take science first and the winery with a grain of salt second. On the bottom of my shoe will be the self declared wine experts. But hey, if you want to listen to people that have no idea what they are talking about, despite them being the collective popular, by all means, go right ahead.

    160. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nanio · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're right, I've been a profligate spender as well (not on your particular examples, but conceded). What I object to (and may have not well articulated) is the use an extravagent expenditure to classify oneself as unique (ie, not 'average' or 'typical'). I'm all for your fundamental uniqueness, but I don't like to think that anyone gets there by lavish consumption, especially of a consumable. Cheers to durables! Or something.

    161. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Except, what you're calling complex is simply different wine. Your statement can be applied to all categories of food but that hardly makes it complex. It simply means various ingredents are activating different areas on your tougue, soft palate, and epiglottis.

      Complex does not necessarily mean good or bad

      "Complex" has nothing to do with price either. And your "complex" is another man's common wine. This is because people's tastebuds vary dramatically and liquids are better at rapidly flushing over them than are foods. What you are calling complex for a wine is what the rest of the world, and even science, simply calls taste sensations.

      After all that, "complex" in of its self is really not the meat of the discussion. The meat is, the wines which experts put forward as "too complex" for a lessor pallet or "inexperienced" is complete bullshit. That's the point which you completely missed. No one is saying that different wines don't taste differently. No one is saying that different wines don't have interesting character...that was your spin. The long of the short is, price is meaningless. The taste experts are worthless. If someone says something along the lines that your pallet isn't developed enough, they are full of shit. And lastly, smelling the cork is for the ignorant masses because it tells you nothing. Tasting it is all that counts. Want to be prentious? Fine, smell the cork...waft it from your decanter...but ultimately, it really only matters if you enjoy the taste. The rest is just a dog and pony show for the ignorant...

      Ultimately, there are exactly three things that matter when you drink wine. One, does it taste good to *you*? Two, does it provide the character you're looking for to compliment your meal? Three, price is meaningless.

    162. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Why? Because even the wineries agree the cork says nothing.

      This makes no sense. The wineries are not saying anything about "what the cork says".

      Wineries are going to synthetics and screw-caps because they recognize the losses than can result in using cork... 90% of their losses due to "corked" wines come from, well, the cork. There is no way for them to analyze real cork and tell whether or not it's going to be bad, or cause the wine to go bad. For that matter, "treated" cork isn't anywhere near as successfull or beneficial as some people believe, and is mostly being abandoned.

      The use of synthetics and screw-tops is a business decision for the wineries... it ensures the quality of their wine, and helps to improve the integrity of their reputation. Nothing like seeing an incredibly good/old case of wine go up for auction and be sold for insane money, only to find that it's corked. One such case and the word can spread like wild-fire, and that can translate to HUGE financial losses.

      The push-back is from the "snobbish" wine drinker that doesn't like the concept of using untraditional bottle stopping techniques or materials... synthetics and/or screw-tops aren't traditional, and removes some of the "elitist" attitude that a lot of people assume comes from drinking "fine" wines. And, some people like the ritual that they partake in when having a nice bottle of wine almost as much as the wine itself... and more power to them. I could care less.

      At the end of the day, most wineries realize that the quality/integrity of their wine and reputation is worth more than the "snobs" desire to maintain tradition.

      Their decision has got nothing to do with what the "cork tells you".

      PS: My brother-in-law is a sommelier, and I'm practically an alcoholic. We've gone to a number of well-known wineries here in BC, in California, France, Italy, and Australia over the past 3 years, and almost every vintner I've watched uncork a bottle of wine that they've ordered at a meal has smelled the cork. The only time that I've not seen them do this is when they're opening their own wine from a known case-lot.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    163. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by marcgvky · · Score: 1

      Being someone who is a wine professional of over a decade it has always been my goal to enhance wine knowledge in others and to help dispel the numerous misunderstanding and misnomers surrounding wine as a whole. I read through the original article published by the Australian Sunday Morning Herald and would like to make the following comments for consideration: 1) I find it difficult to understand how using Beaujolias Neveau as a "litmus test" lends validity to this technology. Beaujolais Neveau is not a wine that is meant to age and it is not aged in barrels. It is bottled extremely young and is ready to drink. Upon release, Neveau is a very smooth, mellow wine already, pretty much at its peak and will not improve with time. Neveau that has a year of bottle age or more is something that i would not, normally, recommend for consumption or appreciation. 2) the comment: "No need to invest in barrels" concerns me and leads me to believe that Mr. Hiroshi Tanaka does not fully understand the various reasons for barrel use. Used barrels, ones that will impart no wood charachter or additional tannins, are used to "round" the wine or introduce minute amounts of oxygenation needed to help the wine evolve. I can see where this technology might help with that but technology already exits to do that without barrels and it is called "Micr-ox" or micro oxygenation where minute amounts of oxygen can be dispersed into wine that is contained in large stainless steel vessels prior to bottling. But "new" or partially used barrels offer the introduction of "wood" in the wine. French, American or Hungarian oak offer flavor comments and a different type of tannin to the wine. This technology does not offer the ability to do that. That would be like saying that there is a technology available that can "zap" a few volts of electricity into cookie dough and it gives it the essence of chocolate chips. 3) Wine, being a living, breathing, product of nature, so to speak, is still not fully understood at the scientific level and some things are better left to nature and time. Artificially speeding the aging process of wine is something that lends itself to a lot of questions and concerns and i would advise remaining extremely skeptical of any technology claiming to do just that.

    164. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Even if it works it won't catch on. Wine is like exotic stereo equipment: people are paying for expensiveness.

      There are people who like spending money on exotic stuff; there are many more people looking for decent quality at a good price. Who's to say the same wouldn't be true with regard to wine?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    165. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post of the year.

    166. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      This is very true - Japan is both obsessed with "collection" and with "vintage" objects and the idea of "historicity". I live in Japan, and nothing ever leaves the store shelves here... the price just goes... up. Case in point - the local toystore that has original NES games still on the shelf - and an original Virtual Boy, still in the wrap. There are huge boutiques for second hand collectibles like tin toys as well

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    167. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      I think it might be best to switch your internet over to "read only" mode for a while.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    168. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by GooberToo · · Score: 1


      Their decision has got nothing to do with what the "cork tells you".

      You have it backwards. The migration to newer/better corks means the cork tells you nothing.

    169. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by nettdata · · Score: 1

      I agree. The new "corks" will tell you nothing.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    170. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

      Perth ;)
      2hrs from the Winery...

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    171. Re:Smells like the same old snake oil... by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      $A10 for 4 litres is not even fit for cooking with.

      If you can't drink it you shouldn't be cooking with it either.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  2. Huh? by pegr · · Score: 4, Funny

    So who else read the headline and thought it was a story about running Windows apps on your MacIntel?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... I too was thinking about the only real Wine... but it seems that TFA is just about an alcoholic drink made of grapes. I wonder how it get here in the first place ?
      --
      In Vino Veritas

    2. Re:Huh? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Personally, I thought it was about running Windows apps under Linux.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Huh? by thecoolestcow · · Score: 0

      Yeah that was me. I thought someone was being clever with the "fine wine" haha

    4. Re:Huh? by creepynut · · Score: 1

      I was worried I was the only one...

      Except it was something about running Kazaa on a Mactel. I was ready to forget about ever buying one :)

    5. Re:Huh? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I thought that the people behind the FastTrack network were having a legal dispute with the Wine team...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Water molecule clusters" is one of the current pseudo-scientific terms used by the snake oil salesmen. It is one easy litmus test to determine that this is pure bunkum (sort of like "perpetual motion" used to be).

    7. Re:Huh? by mu22le · · Score: 1

      I tought it was about p2p and win program running on your linux desktop!!!

  3. God help them by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wine snobs have their noses so far up in the air, I don't understand why they don't get nosebleeds.

    My guess: This is going to turn into the same type of fight with 'natural' diamonds vs 'artificial' diamonds.

    However, I give the win to Hiroshi Tanaka & Company.

    Unlike the diamond industry, nobody can effectively lock you out of the alcohol business.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:God help them by Bazzalisk · · Score: 4, Funny
      Unlike the diamond industry, nobody can effectively lock you out of the alcohol business.

      Shows what you know! Alcoholics Anonymous have been running the industry from behind the scenes for years!

      --
      James P. Barrett
    2. Re:God help them by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Shhh... you are supposed to use the secret keywords... you mean to say that the friends of Bill W have been running it for years ;)

    3. Re:God help them by Belseth · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wine snobs have their noses so far up in the air, I don't understand why they don't get nosebleeds.

      I sense a beer drinker. If they ever come up with a way to turn fine British beer into Budwiser I'll let you know.

    4. Re:God help them by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      I sense a beer drinker. If they ever come up with a way to turn fine British beer into Budwiser I'll let you know.

      Easy! Just drink a few pints of Fuller's ESB, wait about an hour, and dispense the pale yellow fluid directly from your urethra into an appropriate receptacle.

    5. Re:God help them by mfago · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they ever come up with a way to turn fine British beer into Budwiser I'll let you know.

      It's quite simple: drink the British, and piss into a Bud bottle.

    6. Re:God help them by Confoundit · · Score: 1

      This is going to turn into the same type of fight with 'natural' diamonds vs 'artificial' diamonds.

      I heard one of those DeBeers people say "A diamond isn't a symbol of your eternal love if it was made in a lab last week."

      Of couse he's full of shit, but I had to give him credit, that was one hell of an answer.

    7. Re:God help them by rv8 · · Score: 1

      If they ever come up with a way to turn fine British beer into Budwiser I'll let you know.

      That's easy - all you need to do is drink it, wait an hour or two ...

      --
      Kevin Horton
    8. Re:God help them by hunterx11 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Artificial, natural, they're both the same physically. But the difference is human and intangible.

      With a DeBeers diamond, an African child may well have died a result of its production. That's the human touch, and that's why people should be more impressed by a genuine natural diamond.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    9. Re:God help them by dhalgren · · Score: 1

      True. Eternal love can only be expressed by the fruits of slave labour.

    10. Re:God help them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that natural diamonds actually have more imperfections and more random imperfections that make them sparkle more than lab diamonds.

    11. Re:God help them by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I thought that natural diamonds actually have more imperfections and more random imperfections that make them sparkle more than lab diamonds.

      I take it your fiance told you that. I also take it she was told that by either her friends or a woman selling diamonds. Eventually, all the misinformation comes from DeBeers.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    12. Re:God help them by JasonTik · · Score: 1, Funny

      I find it interesting that the parent is currently modded +3 Insightful

    13. Re:God help them by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      I guess that's the same way German beer is turned into Guinness; only that we a bit more "shit" to mix to give it that thick "taste"... :P

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    14. Re:God help them by shawb · · Score: 1

      They claim that, but those imperfections can be added. Diamonds have been made that are indistinguishable from mined diamonds, even microscopically. The whole thing is hype designed to push a WWWAAAAAAYYYYYY overinflated industry. And there's a whole slew of other things going on behind the scenes to keep a small group of people rolling in the money.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    15. Re:God help them by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Who in the hell moded this "Funny"? This is completely true, nothing funny about that.

      --
      AccountKiller
    16. Re:God help them by Anthony · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that diamonds at standard temperature and pressure are NOT forever.

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
    17. Re:God help them by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      No, the pissing thing is an old hoax. In reality Budweiser is created by mixing one part regular beer with nine parts distilled water.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    18. Re:God help them by StressedEd · · Score: 1
      fine British beer


      I would respectfully point out that Fullers ESB is not a fine British beer, it's certainly "extra special". Of course if you are comparing it to American Budweiser [*]....


      [*] Not to be confused with the Czech beer.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    19. Re:God help them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the line runs, it's amazing what can count as insightful these days.

      Unfortunately, I'm afraid the wine trade is going to win on this one, because it's proven rubbish :

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/badscience/story/0, ,1656827,00.html

      Let us consider that the device did work, and could really change the taste of wine.
      Let us also consider the fact that wine critics have often been proven unable to distinguish cheap supermarket plonk from upmarket wines.
      If that is the case, what do you gain by using such a device?
      The only advantage would be if there was genuine objective way in which some wines WERE measurably better than others. Which would mean that the wine experts could have a point.

      While I'm on the subject, I'd like to dispense with the idea that expensive wine is all a con. I made that discovery early one morning, when a friend of mine who worked as a sous-chef in a major hotel turned up after his shift with a bottle of rather expensive red that had been sent back (the nice thing for him was that in that situation the opened bottles went to staff as they can't be resold). It was my first experience of any wine above the $10 mark, and the difference was noticeable, which wasn't the best discovery of my life. Gosh, sometimes the expensive things rich people have are actually better. Who'd have thought it!

    20. Re:God help them by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add water.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    21. Re:God help them by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Well, it is possible, but if that's true, they must start with pretty bad beer. Like the one I once had in Russia, that sent me running to the restroom every hour for the next two days. In that case the propper procedure is:

      1) Boil the beer or mix it with bleech to get rid of the bacteria.
      2) Mix one part of the disinfected beer with 9 parts of distilled water.
      3) Call it Budweiser, after a completely different beer made in completely different part of the world.
      4) Profit!

      Your decription simply does not not explain the taste. I mean, if you need to chill a beer to near 0 in order to be able to drink it, you have pretty bad tasting beer!

      --
      AccountKiller
  4. Into a fine, mellow wine in seconds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only problem is that drinkers must be accelerated to relativistic speeds to be effective. Innovative Design and Technology is currently looking for funding to clear this final, minor hurtle to the process.

    1. Re:Into a fine, mellow wine in seconds... by sorrydaijin · · Score: 1

      Gimme back my... hic... bloody car keysh... hic... and I'll show you how its done. hic.

  5. Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All a machine like this is going to do is make your wine worth less. A good well-aged wine is expensive because of the time it takes to make it. If all of the sudden you're pumping them out like cans of coke, you're going to have cheap wine regardless of how it tastes. People need to remember there is a huge traditional following where winemaking is concerned. People who truly appreciate fine wines will not buy stuff which breaks from traditional wine making.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  6. shochu? too bad by 246o1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to try this out, living in Japan as I do, but if you'd ever tried shochu, perhaps you'd understand that it's not exactly that similar to wine. I personally can't stand the drink straight, but it's great in mixed drinks, the so-called chu-hai (short for shochu highball) that come in all sorts of delicious flavors.

    Shochu has been very popular amongst young people lately, so there's a big market they can hit. I hope they convince a sake or wine company to try it, so I can give it a try. Here's the wikipedia link to find out more on shochu: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shochu

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  7. no more Barrels by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting
    heh, I just RTFA and this part made me laugh
    "Think of the savings we'll make. Shorter production time, no need for storage, no need to invest in barrels," he said.
    Recently, in England, they cut down a 340 yr old oak tree to make wine barrels.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2000 913,00.html

    Part of the cachet of drinking fine wines is that it is expensive and exclusive. Once you start allowing the hoi polloi to have access, it no longer becomes so special.

    To make an example you'll all understand, think G-Mail invites. Specifically, when they first started getting passed around.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:no more Barrels by Saeger · · Score: 1

      You mean two-buck-chuck doesn't make me a wine snob? Even if I drink it with my pinky extended? :(

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:no more Barrels by clifyt · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Recently, in England, they cut down a 340 yr old oak tree to make wine barrels."

      Actually -- they cut down the 340 year old tree because it was infested and needed to be destroyed before it infested other 300 year old trees around it.

      The fact that the tree was well known and thus to be used for wine making is secondary. I read this the other day and treehuggers were getting all bent out of shape about it until someone picked up the full story.

      But yeah, wine in a barrel tastes 'more complex'. Better? I don't know...I don't care. But the wine snobs I know can actually tell you the type of barrel it was stored in by the characteristics of the wine (apparently its not hard to figure out if you studied the subject).

    3. Re:no more Barrels by GroeFaZ · · Score: 2

      Recently, in England, they cut down a 340 yr old oak tree to make wine barrels.

      It should be pointed out that the tree stood in France, which had the inevitable consequence of it being cut down in France, not England. FTA:

      The 120-ft Morat tree was planted in about 1665 in the Forêt de Tronçais, on the edge of the Massif Central, in the reign of Louis XIV.

      Interesting story nonetheless.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    4. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoi polloi means "the many" in Greek. The the many? Ummmmm... no....

    5. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmmmmm... yes..

      hoi polloi (hoi p-loi)
      n.

              The common people; the masses.

    6. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the cachet of drinking fine wines is that it is expensive and exclusive.

      Only part? Chemistry has little or nothing to do with the cache (or the price) of the "best" wines. Even if the hoi polloi do have access, I'll wager that snobs will continue to be snobs, self-important twits will continue to grandstand, and the price of an exclusive vintage won't drop a penny.

    7. Re:no more Barrels by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      As a loaned phrase, "hoi polloi" is an indivisible unit of meaning in English, and it is perfectly acceptable (albeit counterintuitive) to use an English article with it.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    8. Re:no more Barrels by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an old Asimov short story about the difference between synthetic garlic flavour and the real thing...I forget what it was, but it conveyed the same sentiment - that natural garlic was infinitely more complex and subtle than synthetic garlic even though food synthesis technology had reached its peak in the future.

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    9. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Part of the cachet of drinking fine wines is that it is expensive and exclusive. Once you start allowing the hoi polloi to have access, it no longer becomes so special."

      Yes i see how Cutting down trees to make barrels makes the wine more special to an Arrogant-Elitist-Arse(tm). When I was your age, drinking wine was to get high and rowdy^H^H^H^H^H merry, everything else didnt matter; like how it was made or how many trees were cut down for it.

    10. Re:no more Barrels by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      I read an article recently (no link - sorry) about a reaction of wineries (in Australia) against 'over-oaking' wine. This is thought to overpower the natural tastes of the wine (caused by soil type, grape type, amount of water, climate, etc, etc. Some wineries are now using less oak.

      It seems to me, though, that this machine _is_ snake oil. Wine is an incredibly complex system. It's important to keep it very stable (temperature, especially) while aging. There are so many factors that determine how it ages, I seriously doubt this could be duplicated by a machine. Perhaps some kind of emulation could occur (reducing the tannins, for example), but I doubt it would be the same as aged wine - perhaps it just takes away some of the sharpness of very immature wine...

      On another note - there are heaps of wankers when it comes to wine. I think it depends on palatte. I reckon I can (in general) taste the difference between a $10 bottle, and a $20 bottle, but the difference between a $50 and a $60 bottle is lost on me. I guess prices reflect only supply and demand, just like everything else.

    11. Re:no more Barrels by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      From my half-assed research into the subject, a barrel does two things. First, it contributes flavor. The newer the barrel and the longer the wine is sYou can tell, at least to a certain extent.tored in the barrel, the more flavor is contributed. Second, it allows the young wine to evaporate (which does not really happen if the wine is properly stored in either glass or stainless steel). Wine makers have to make sure that the barrel is full. The more space is open in the barrel, the more surface area you have for bacterial growth. There's also the possiblity that small (i.e., trace) amounts of oxygen improve wine flavor, which the greater permeability of the barrel might allow. Google for "micro-oxygenation" if you're interested. It may or may not be snake oil itself, but it certainly isn't practical for the home wine maker (e.g., me--I have a few glass carboys of wine in my basement I need to bottle).

    12. Re:no more Barrels by lgw · · Score: 1

      The Oxford Usage Guide puts "the hoi polloi" in the category of "we give up" - experts know it's wrong, but no one cares enough to object any more (the mis-usage is very old now), so it's acceptable in formal writing.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story in question is "Not in Good Taste", if I remember rightly (might have been "Good Taste".)

    14. Re:no more Barrels by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      I read an article recently (no link - sorry) about a reaction of wineries (in Australia) against 'over-oaking' wine. This is thought to overpower the natural tastes of the wine (caused by soil type, grape type, amount of water, climate, etc, etc.

      Maybe that's part of what was wrong with the two Yellow Tail wines I've tried.

      I tried a Pinot Grigio and a Shiraz from them. I'd heard that they were decent low-priced wines, so I thought this'd be a good buy. Both were really, really thin (like, soapy water thin) and had a horrible chemical/mineral flavor that I've never tasted anywhere else. The PG was absolutely undrinkable.

      Might that have been the problem? Over-oaking?

    15. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting the third thing a barrel is supposed to do... it holds the wine while it ages so you don't get wine all over the floor.

    16. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Something I don't understand... Because someone is educated in a subject they are somehow a snob? So someone who likes Perl is a snob? WTF is wrong w/ everyone?

      SNOB SNOB SNOB!

    17. Re:no more Barrels by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I actually looked it up online before using it in my post & whatever site I looked at said that even in the earliest English usages of the phrase that they could find, people had put "the" before it.

      So I figured, why buck the trend?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    18. Re:no more Barrels by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      But yeah, wine in a barrel tastes 'more complex'. Better? I don't know...I don't care. But the wine snobs I know can actually tell you the type of barrel it was stored in by the characteristics of the wine (apparently its not hard to figure out if you studied the subject).
      Back before a local microbrewery was bought out by a mega chain... A bunch of us used to head up to their fairly rural brewpub every Friday. Without training, just by experience - we could tell when the kegs behind the bar had been swapped out to a new batch.
    19. Re:no more Barrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the cachet of drinking fine wines is that it is expensive and exclusive. Once you start allowing the hoi polloi to have access, it no longer becomes so special.

      The hoi polloi won't have access to really fine wines, by definition. What makes them so fine is not the quality, but the price. The idea that these pricey wines are superior in quality to a good $50 bottle is sheer delusion. The hoi polloi already have access to wines as good as the really pricey wines, just without the expense and pretense.

    20. Re:no more Barrels by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Most whites are made in a steel vat with a bag of Oak shavings.

    21. Re:no more Barrels by dmatos · · Score: 1

      So are they claiming that the machine not only ages the wine, it also imparts the flavour of oak to it as well? Does it have different settings so you can get regular oak, toasted oak, and steel barrel aged? Somehow I don't think so.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
  8. The secret to fine wine by 0rbit4l · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if they've learned from the Simpsons and are just adding antifreeze...

  9. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Sefert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People who make their own product for their own consumption is who. My brother makes his own wines for himself - imagine the fun he'd have seeing what his wine would taste like in one, two or three years with this machine. I agree - most 'real' wine makers probably wouldn't want to touch this, except for the vineyards that already 'temper' their wine to taste the same year after year like the Ernest and Julio Gallo types, but I think there's a huge home market possibility here.

  10. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

    The time (labor) and the years of time building the knowledge of the vinters to blend it just right, and time to age it just right. Next thing you know they'll be turning Beer into Champagne for those who can't afford the real thing! I don't think this will affect the high end wine brands. Many wine brands are recoginized as premium and consumers will pay the higher price when the wine really does not have the quality to demand the price.

  11. Now way by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This will never take off. Expensive wine is no different than expensive diamonds. People buy them because they are expensive. We've created diamonds in labs that "don't have enough impurities", according to the jewelry industry (and people seem so agree for some reason). This wine wont "have enough impurities" either.

    1. Re:Now way by daniel_mcl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good deal of the character of fine wines and spirits comes precisely from the "impurities," which are actually just the various flavors present in the wine. The goal (my statements here actually apply to Scotch Whisky, with which I'm more familiar, but should generalize to wine) is to produce something with an intricate, multifaceted flavor -- exactly the opposite of what most beverage manufacturers (Coke, Pepsi, etc.) are trying to do. These sorts of "impurities" are the sort of things that set a painting apart from a photograph, or a live musician apart from a MIDI performance.

      Of course, a large amount of expensive wine and spirits (likely the majority) end up being purchased by wealthy people more interested in showing off their sophistication than actually drinking the stuff; the true connoisseurs are more likely to be the college student who trades seeing movies for a couple months for a single bottle which he finishes in a couple days or the regular middle-class guy who feels somewhat uncomfortable when he goes to buy a bottle of wine at an unnecessarily metrosexual storefront than the Paris Hiltons of the world.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    2. Re:Now way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth noting that value is strictly a perception. It doesn't necessarily imply that one is an idiot to pay a premium for something where the price is not justified merely by the value of the raw materials and labor. Unless of course that one individual is the only one who can justify the price.

      I personally enjoy wine. I have enjoyed bottles of wine at $110 as well as $9. I have found that expensive wines are consistently better (from my point of view) than cheaper ones. I can assure you though that the $9 bottle that I do enjoy gets my money 90% of the time.

    3. Re:Now way by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      People buy them because they are expensive.

      People buy them because they are expensive because people believe they are rare because everyone who makes money with jewelery diamond makes people believe diamonds are rare. The diamond business is ruled by what might be the most perfect monopoly in the world. I recommend this older Wired article: The new Diamond Age about two companies that employ two different processes to bypass the natural creation of diamond, taking a mighty piss at DeBeer's legs while they're at it.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    4. Re:Now way by glacote02 · · Score: 1

      You are completely missing the point. Real diamonds taste much better than synthetic ones...

    5. Re:Now way by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You compare a few different things here, which aren't exactly comparable. Diamonds, for instance, are expensive primarily because DeBeers has spent over a century ruthlessly restricting supply, and creating artificial demand. The cultured diamonds are here, available, and cheap. However, the companies are facing threatening behaviour from DeBeers, legal sanctions (mostly brought about by DeBeers), and bad publicity (from...well, you know).

      Wine and spirits are another matter. The market is unfortunately filled with speculators who ultimately do nothing but drive up the price of rare wines, as well as insecure rich people who buy the "right" wines with no appreciation for them. However, good wines _do_ cost more because they come from lower producing vinyards, take more care to make, and require more _real_ aging which leads to evaporation. If this device could eliminate the aging and evaporation, then it might irritate some insecure twits, but most wine lovers would be ecstatic at being able to buy world-class wine for under a hundred bucks.

      Unfortunately, it's pseudoscience at its worst. Pity, really.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    6. Re:Now way by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      You're misreading the intent. This device isn't intended to make expensive wine cheap. It's intended to make cheap wine taste better.

      People who drive Lexus automobiles aren't a relevant concern when making more comfortable seats in Camrys.

      For your comment to be true, there can't be anyone out there that buys cheap wine. As two buck chuck demonstrated, there's a tremendous market out there for cheap wine that's decent quality.

      Low price doesn't mean a wine isn't worth drinking.

    7. Re:Now way by txgunslinger · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the argument about solid state vs. tube amps for guitars. What will happen is that some people that have no idea will form opinions based on (insert person who likes expensive wine) here, most people will not be able to tell the difference side by side, and people who are actually around the stuff all the time will be the only ones who will ever be able to tell (and then be very loud about the fact that true aged wine is the only "real" wine...like artifically aged is fake somehow). There will also be a small contingent of people who will say the "new" wine is better, and whine when some wine snob makes fun of the new stuff.

      Personally, I'll just be getting drunk on whatever tastes good.

    8. Re:Now way by Jardine · · Score: 1

      You are completely missing the point. Real diamonds taste much better than synthetic ones...

      Well of course they do. Synthetic diamonds don't have the blood of young Africans on them. That's where the real flavour comes from.

    9. Re:Now way by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      "This will never take off. Expensive wine is no different than expensive diamonds. People buy them because they are expensive."

      I think it's obvious this is for the cheap wines. No shit expensive wine producers won't want to do anything that might be perceived as devaluing.

      People who are already selling on price would be lining up to increase their quality...AND their margins. If that puts them closer to the more expensive wines in quality, that devalues them whether they like it or not, but the cheaper competitors aren't going to lose any sleep over it.

    10. Re:Now way by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Actually, it's very different. People buy diamonds in part because of tradition, and in part because of perceived rarity. From what I recall, rubies and emeralds are rarer, but cost less.

      Wines like Chateau Latour, Penfolds Grange or Chateau d'Yqeem retain their prices because of quality and rarity. If a winemaker stops making quality wine under those names, they will soon start slipping. Some people will buy what is expensive, but in part that is driven by reviewers and non-snobby consumers. Wines will only retain their price for a short while if the quality slips.

      I've drank some high price wines, and while a few have been disappointing, some have been breathtaking - full of complex fruit and depth. No cheap wine I've tried has matched them. I only wish I could say that it was not true. I don't have much money to buy £20+ bottles of wine, but occassionally I treat myself. I'd rather be able to have 3*£7 bottles than 1*20 bottle, but I'd rather have 1 excellent bottle than 3 quite good ones. If I could find £7 bottles to match the £20 one, I'd switch, but I can't.

    11. Re:Now way by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but never underestimate the demand for cheap wines. If this device can make cheap wines taste better without costing much, you can be guaranteed that it'll be used to justify an extra cost of $5-10 a bottle on the $5 wines.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  12. Sake is Not Wine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sake is not wine. It is made from grain and brewed. By law and common sense that makes it beer in the US.

    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
    1. Re:Sake is Not Wine by paedobear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's made from rice. By law and common sense that makes it not-beer everywhere BUT the US.

    2. Re:Sake is Not Wine by ACME+Septic · · Score: 0

      By law and common sense that makes it beer in the US.

      What law is that? In California, for example, any "beer" over 3.99% alcohol cannot be referred to as beer, and must be referred to as malt liquor, lager, etc. Sake is 15-17% alcohol, and I seriously doubt any BATF regulations would permit calling it a beer in the USA.

      Similarly, vodka is usually made from grain, does that make it a beer as well?

      Sake is likely referred to as a rice wine, because the alcohol content is similar to wine, and it's not carbonated.

    3. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      In California, for example, any "beer" over 3.99% alcohol cannot be referred to as beer, and must be referred to as malt liquor, lager, etc

      What a strange law. There'a a LOT of beer that's 4% alcohol or more. Lager has nothing to do with the alcohol content of beer, but with the type of yeast used. What do you call Guiness, which has about 4.2% alcohol by volume, or even Budweiser, which is 5% ABV?

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:Sake is Not Wine by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Now thats just lame.
      Its illegal to call Budwieser beer in california?
      That should go onto one of those "dumb laws" sites...

      Anyone know why they would limit what you can call "beer" (somehow, I suspect its got to do with what tax you pay on different alcoholic drinks...)

    5. Re:Sake is Not Wine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

      For purposes of regulation the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) classes all brewed grain beverages as generically as beer, regardless of whether they can be labeled as beer in the various states. Most states (and maybe the BATF as well, I forget) have labeling regulations similar to what you describe. However, BATF does not distinguish between beer and malt liquor for it's basic regulations (i.e. production standards). Vodka is not beer because it is distilled, not brewed.

      Interestingly, California classes sake as a wine, presumably for the reason you describe. However, Federal law trumps that via the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. At any rate, anyon in the booze business will tell you that a brewed grain beverage is not wine..

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    6. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Ricwot · · Score: 1

      Bud is a lager, and generally Guiness is like nothing else.

    7. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At any rate, anyon in the booze business will tell you that a brewed grain beverage is not wine..
      Not true. Google "barley wine" if you don't believe me.
    8. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is made from grain and brewed. By law and common sense that makes it beer in the US.
      The law is an ass. As for common sense, sake is made from rice, not barley, so on that score isn't typical of beer. Also, the kind of yeast used is different, and there are other differences in production methods that differentiate beer from sake. Beer is also flavored with hops, sake is not. Finally, beer is much lower in alcohol than sake, except for certain speciality beers such as barley wine.
    9. Re:Sake is Not Wine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

      Barley wine is a misnomer, or perhaps more accurately a euphemism. Just for fun I did google it and the very first link I found read,

      "But make no mistake about it. Barley wine is an ale, a proud member of the beer family that is neither plain nor simple."

      In other words, barley wine is beer, not wine.

      I am quite familiar with barley wine. When I was in college I was the bouncer for the first bar in Massachusets to serve Old Foghorn. Also, my best friend used to be a professional brewer before he became a professional vintner (Celler Master).

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    10. Re:Sake is Not Wine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      As for common sense, sake is made from rice, not barley, so on that score isn't typical of beer. Also, the kind of yeast used is different, and there are other differences in production methods that differentiate beer from sake. Beer is also flavored with hops, sake is not. Finally, beer is much lower in alcohol than sake, except for certain speciality beers such as barley wine..
      You mean like Budweiser? Bud is made mostly with rice. Read the label. Most people consider it beer, if not good beer. Beer can be made with all sorts of yeast and in fact was made for thousands of years before cultured yeast existed. Before the 19th century (IIRC) beer production depended entirely on the local wild yeast in the air (as many Belgian beers still are and Pilsner Urquell was until recently). Nobody had any idea what kind of yeast they were using and it varied wildly by location. The alcohol level is essentially moot, since you yourself cite high alcohol beers.

      Interesting sidenote: several years ago there was a rash of rye malt beers out of the west coast. According to Fritz Maytag this happened because industrial spies discovered he was buying rye in bulk. In reality, he was buying it for his secret Old Poterero rye whiskey project. They assumed he was making some kind of Anchor rye beer and wanted to beat him to the punch. Old Poterero is a damn fine rye, if a little hot. Like all Fritz Maytag products it is high in historicity.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    11. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean like Budweiser? Bud is made mostly with rice. Read the label.
      Budweiser is still based on barley. Mixing barley with other grains - such as oatmeal or wheat - is a very old practice in beer brewing.
      Most people consider it beer, if not good beer. Beer can be made with all sorts of yeast and in fact was made for thousands of years before cultured yeast existed. Before the 19th century (IIRC) beer production depended entirely on the local wild yeast in the air (as many Belgian beers still are and Pilsner Urquell was until recently). Nobody had any idea what kind of yeast they were using and it varied wildly by location. The alcohol level is essentially moot, since you yourself cite high alcohol beers.
      Yeast and production methods affect flavor. No one tasting sake would confuse it with beer - and that's not just because of the rice. You didn't touch on the topic of hops which I mentioned; again, that's a flavor issue. What makes beer "beer" is not just the kind of grain used but the overall "gestalt" of the thing; in that regard sake is most definitely not beer and in many respects more "wine like", regardless of the kind of ingredients used. That's the point that this pettifoggery over definitions entirely misses: you can't define "beer" or "wine" simplistically according to ingredients if you insist on broad definitions of terminology. If sake is "beer" simply because it is fermented from grains, then it surely is "wine" because of its taste and alcoholic strength, which are factors of far more concern to most people than the ingredients or production methods.
    12. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Barley wine can be aged just like wine.

      Barley wine has other wine-like qualities that don't make it fit neatly into the beer or ale category. For one thing it tends to be much sweeter than ales and thus more wine-like. Of course it's not like typical European wines, but then again most wines throughout the world aren't like typical European wines either.

      Just because you are stuck with your definitions and terminology does not mean that the rest of us are similarly blinkered.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barleywine

      Barley wine
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
      (Redirected from Barleywine)
      Jump to: navigation, search
      Because of their unusual strength, some English ales are often referred to as barley wines. They typically reach an alcohol strength of 8 to 12% by volume (some have gone as high as 15%) and are brewed from specific gravities as high as 1.120. Their natural sweetness is usually balanced with a degree of hoppy bitterness. In some examples, the malt sweetness is also balanced by the bitter flavor of the alcohol.

      This beer is meant for slow sipping and savoring of its estery, fruity, and well-aged character. It is brewed most often to celebrate events. Because of the high hop rate and alcohol content, some barley wines are aged for years.

      Most barley wines range in color from ambers to deep reddish-browns.

      Barley Wine Statistics: Original gravities: 1.090-1.120; Alcohol: 8.5-12 percent; Bitterness: 50-100 IBU (International Bitterness Units); Color: 12-24 SRM (Standard Reference Method)

      So you age it and drink it much like you would a wine; I don't see in any way how "barley wine" is a misnomer or a euphemism. This is an extremely narrow minded viewpoint on your part.

      If you want to be pedantic the root or origin of the word "wine" shares the same origins as the word "vine" so pedantically a wine can't be a wine unless made from grapes or other fruit of the vine. Fortunately, our language is not controlled by pedants.
    13. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Rice is grain. Stuff brewed from grain is beer. Just because the stuff is brewed from unusual grains doesn't mean it's not a kind of beer, just as there can be wines made from fruits other than wine grapes.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:Sake is Not Wine by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Stuff brewed from grain is not "beer" in other countries. C.f. the fact that Budweiser (and I assume other US beers...) is only brewed from rice in the US, and in other countries it is brewed from wheat, same as other beer. For instance, in Japan they have "happoshu" which ISN'T beer, isn't allowed to be called beer, and is taxed at a different rate to beer. The US has no (or very few) controls on what things are called compared to the rest of the civilised world - it's why you have cheap domestic "whisky" and "champage" (that last has just recently been changed so that only real Champagne can carry the name now)

    15. Re:Sake is Not Wine by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Now that I think about it, there's also the phenomenon of "beef" burgers and "chicken" nuggets. America is a very Caveat Emptor place.

    16. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      After checking with Wikipedia I have learnt that sake only is beer in Germany; the German word of beer is more equivalent to the English "malt liquor", which is the superclass of beer and all other beverages derived from fermented grain.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    17. Re:Sake is Not Wine by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      English beer has absolutely no problem dealing with strong numbers and still rating them as ales and not wine. IPA (India Pale Ale) for example, was traditionally brewed at about 10% and used to be quite a sweet mellow beverage. It was extra-hopped and sugared to protect it on the long journey to india, and by the time it arrived, it was quite a delicate tasty number.

      --

      jh

    18. Re:Sake is Not Wine by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Surely if you want to look at German, you'd want to look at the classes of beer such as Lager and Pils? "Malt Liquor" is an abomination generated by the fucking weird laws over alcohol sales and consumption in some states.

    19. Re:Sake is Not Wine by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on that. It seems, however, that your definition of "beer" is narrower than ours - interestingly, since we're the one with the Great Almighty Purity Law.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    20. Re:Sake is Not Wine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

      According to the BATF you can define it this way and they do. Also the Sumerians made beer without hops and using yeast unheard of in modern European brews. Your position is extremely Eurocentric.

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    21. Re:Sake is Not Wine by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Rice is grain. Stuff brewed from grain is beer.

      No. Stuff brewed from malted grain is beer. Rice cannot be malted. In fact, it needs to be processed with a special fungus to be rendered fermentable. Laws of the land notwithstanding, sake is not beer or even close to it.

      just as there can be wines made from fruits other than wine grapes.

      What makes a wine a wine comes from the process. The process of fermenting fruits is similar, no matter which fruit you use. But knowledge of brewing beer will not get you far in brewing sake, and vice versa. They simply aren't in the same category.

    22. Re:Sake is Not Wine by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Barley wine can be aged just like wine.

      All beers can be aged. Some benefit from it more than others. Some are hurt by aging. You wouldn't want to age a mild, but I'd definitely give a Scotch Ale several months to mellow out before drinking. In general, the higher the specific gravity of the wort (before fermentation) the longer it'll take to age it out. None of this has anything to do with "wine."

      Barley wine has other wine-like qualities that don't make it fit neatly into the beer or ale category. For one thing it tends to be much sweeter than ales and thus more wine-like.

      It is sweeter because there is more residual sugar left in it. There is more residual sugar because there was more sugar in the first place. Barleywine is simply a very strong ale.

      Another thing which clearly distinguishes barleywine from actual wine is that completely different types of yeast are used for the two beverages.

      Just because you are stuck with your definitions and terminology does not mean that the rest of us are similarly blinkered.

      There is absolutely nothing in the process of making barleywine that is at all different than lighter brews, except of course that the sugar content is higher. Basically, barleywine is either partigyle brewed without sparging (which can be done with any style) or simply boiled down for a longer period of time. This does not magically promote it to "wine."

      I don't see in any way how "barley wine" is a misnomer or a euphemism.

      Even the people who MAKE the stuff (this includes me) think it is a misnomer. Not a terribly important one, but a misnomer nonetheless. Barleywine is a very strong ale. Period.

      Fortunately, our language is not controlled by pedants.

      Nobody in the brewing industry agrees with you on this, and certainly not those of us that actually make barleywine. Barleywine is ale, pure and simple.

    23. Re:Sake is Not Wine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      No. Stuff brewed from malted grain is beer. Rice cannot be malted. In fact, it needs to be processed with a special fungus to be rendered fermentable. Laws of the land notwithstanding, sake is not beer or even close to it.
      I was wondering if anyone would bring this up, because it is a valid point. But I don't agree that sake isn't even close to beer. It is a lot closer to beer than anything else. However, I concede it would have been more accurate if I had said sake was beer by law and more similar to beer than wine in method of production. But I would also contend that the use of rice-koji is analogous to malting (if quite a different process chemically) in that the purpose of both is to turn starch into fermentable sugar. I understand that malting does not involve an active additive, but it does involve an additive (water) and a catalyst (heat). Arguably not all that different.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
  13. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the hell is wrong with Beaujolais Nouveau??? bunch of wine snobs to want to pay for anything other than george de beouf, mateus, or liebfraumilch.....

  14. Beaujolais Nouveau is SUPPOSED to be drank fresh by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    Beaujolais Nouveau is SUPPOSED to be drank right after a short fermentation process. It tastes like CRAP if it's allowed to age more than 6 months.

    In france they have festivals mid-november, when the year's Beaujolais Nouveau's are officially allowed to be drank.

  15. now... by arghblubber · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... i was wondering for a second what tha kazaa guys had against that emulator thingy

    1. Re:now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WINE Is Not an Emulator. But that is similar to what I thought when I read the headline.

  16. Good for table wine by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think this will effect fine wine, with all of its Traditions and it has an established community that celebrates it, almost like a religion.

    With the cheaper tablewines though this will probably be good for business, wine won't have to be stored as long and better products can be served to the market. I like table wine and I have found there are some really good ones & really bad ones, something like this could improve the overall quality of the cheaper wines & make it a lot eaiser to find a good cheap wine.

    With boutique beer becoming more popular & mixed drinks going into more exotic flavours and still being sold at really cheap prices, improved table wine quality would help it compete against these products.

  17. huh? by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1, Insightful

    From TFA "In the natural maturation process, the taste of wine is enhanced by the mixture of alcohol with water molecule clusters, Tanaka says." huh? I think the sugar has something to do with the taste as well.

  18. A real chemical change by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    Unlike the magnets, this electrical system really does chemically change the wine. It's a good question whether its effect is chemically similar to what you'd get if you just let the wine sit in a cellar for 2 decades... but I'm keeping an open mind. In my view, it's unlikely that the aging effect is so chemically complex and exacting that it couldn't be accelerated or at least simulated nearly enough, or even improved upon!

    I would certainly pay $5 for a bottle of new wine treated this way, just to see what I think. Hell, I'd even pay $10 if the initial wine were decent. (Aging crappy wine leaves with you with crappy old wine and I'm sure this device can't fix it either.)

    Even if it makes a small improvement, it still seems worth doing because the process just sounds so incredibly cheap! Also, if it really eliminates the need for anti-oxydizing additives, that alone is justification enough.

    As far as wine experts are concerned, I don't think they're worthless or stupid. Wine reviews really are useful as a starting point. I've never tasted a wine with a 87+ rating which I thought was bad. Some wines I love are not rated highly by Wine Spectator, but they've never given a high rating to a gross wine. I hope they're impartial once they get to taste these electro-processed wines. There will be pressure on them not to be, but I still have faith.

    And I absolutely agree with the need for double-blind experiments. I'd love to see 50 experts comparing a new untreated California wine, a 2000 from the same vineyard (famously good year), and the new wine that's electro-treated. Actually, I'd love to participate in this test. If these Japanese inventors were smart, they'd go to a Napa valley wine festival and offer a showy double-blind taste test. That would get peoples' attention, and they'd have no shortage of snooty, unpaid test subjects.

    1. Re:A real chemical change by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1
      There may exist a system or process technology but the machine described in this article has all the hallmark of a snake oil operation.

      Tanaka claims the electrolysis treatment instantaneously breaks up water clusters in the wine, allowing the water to more thoroughly blend with the alcohol

      It is the first time that I know ethanol does not mix well with water. Do I drink too much or the other way round?

      Platinum electrodes provide the juice, driving negative ions - the cause of acidity - from the wine into the water

      Sounds like the culprit for bad wine (or any alcohol) is due to acidity. It is really not the case. pH paper is cheap. It can tell the truth. Crap wine does not necessarily be very acidic.

      If you have study the chemical of immature vs matured beer/ wine, you will notice the chemical changes are very pronounce. Not just simply the pH. For example, before aging the aldehyde level can be high. How can you deal with it? There are hundreds of favour compounds in wine. Any naive chemical tricks (like randomly adding extra oxidant/reductant will kill the favour and render the wine undrinkable-- not just bad).
      In addition, for some product like red wine, the storage material (the oak barrel) actually contributes to the favour... For those who are keen, find a copy of this:
      Chemistry of Wine Flavor
      Andrew L. Waterhouse and Susan E. Ebeler
      by Oxford University Press 1999.

  19. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I like wine and am rather picky. That said, if something can produce EXACTLY the same thing as the slowly aged, $$$$$ expensive, traditionally made wine, then I must ask:

    Who. The. Fuck. Cares.

    Tradition be damned. Technology has replaced a good deal of tradition. Though, I am sure, this device will be illegal in France.

  20. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Maybe for a generation the next generation will laugh at us and buy this stuff by the case and all the "traditional wine makers" will be relegated to the dustbin of history. Progress waits for no w/hine.

  21. Beaujolais Nouveau doesn't need improvement. by baomike · · Score: 1

    If done anywhere well it is quite fine to drink. My wine of choice in late Nov and Dec. Drink it fresh & drink it often, yum.

    I Western Oregon we usually have a choice between 4-5 makers. Buy one of each , find which is best, buy, drink, repeat ,repeat ...

  22. Bad Example by hopbine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Beaujolais Nouveau is best when it is young. The third Thursday of November is the day it's shipped.

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
  23. FastTrack wants to fine Wine? by JuliusRV · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was I the only one thinking FastTrack wanted to fine the Wine project for something?

    1. Re:FastTrack wants to fine Wine? by XMilkProject · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. The editor thought so too.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  24. Beaujolais Nouveau... by maino82 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... is supposed to be drunk immediately anyway, so trying to turn it into a more "aged" wine is kind of defeating the purpose. wine snobs from all over travel to france every year to drink this wine on the day it comes out. personally, i can't stand beaujolais nouveau anyway, so maybe this would make it more bearable, but for those who do enjoy it this is kind of pointless.

    1. Re:Beaujolais Nouveau... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Maybe some people really like Nouveau, but it sounds more like clueless wine snobbery to me to travel there for it. Better to fly to Bordeaux and head into the Medoc.

  25. 12 step process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 13 = profit!

  26. Total snake oil by Trotsky820 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article babbles on about breaking up the "water clusters" and letting alcohol more fully mix with the the water to make the wine age more quickly. In fact, wine ages by a number of complex reactions both in cask storage, and later in the bottle. In particular, fine red wines age in the bottle through a series of reactions, many involving the breakdown of various tannic molecules. Also, really fine wines age over years, cheaper wines designed to be drunk early just get worse after time. If you take a five liter jug of crap wine and store it in a cellar for ten years, it just tastes like crap. I saw a lot of comments here about the snob value of wine, and how that will hold this process back. Actually the wine industry is pretty open to new technology in all but the most hidebound, traditional regions. The reason you will never here about this process again, is because it won't do anything, not because "the industry" will quash it.

    1. Re:Total snake oil by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "the wine industry is pretty open to new technology"

      Then why are they still mostly using corks, which have no advantages whatsoever and cause a percentage of the wine to spoil?

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    2. Re:Total snake oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between the wine industry and the wine consumers mind you.
      Synthetic corks still have bad reputation among most of wine buyers, so even though the wine industry would gladly use them, they just can't.
      There's even more to it. There is a difference between the wine industry and little wine makers (amounting to the vast majority of the wine produced here in France).
      These small units just can't be bothered to do research or to experiment with exotic solutions. The governement-funded research body about wine is trying to explain to them the advantages of synthetic corks, but it's a slow process to over-tune generations long customs.

      It's like if you were trying to make MacDonalds use plastic-made salad in their hamburgers, rather than natural salad...wait a minute

    3. Re:Total snake oil by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 1

      Then why are they still mostly using corks, which have no advantages whatsoever and cause a percentage of the wine to spoil?

      Depends which wine industry you are talking about. But my pick of the answers would be:
      (a) Because consumers are irrational snobs when it comes to wine.
      (b) They're not.
      (c) Both of the above.
      (d) Because I'm French.

      The Australian wine industry has been pretty innovative. The Stelvin seal hasn't made it onto top quality reds yet (that is, those designed to be cellared and aged before consumption) because it doesn't breathe in the same way as cork (cork does actually have some advantages here). But given that 90% of wine is consumed within 24 hours of purchase, a lot of producers are making the switch. Practically all of the quality white wines I have brought in my local bottlo recently have screw-caps.

      Indeed, it isn't the wine industry that is the problem (they know how much product they loose to corking) but the wine-snob consumers (which extends all the way down to consumers of Two Buck Chuck). Look at the timeline at the link I included. Screwcaps were used in Australia between 1977 and 1984 but withdrawn because of consumer resistance.

    4. Re:Total snake oil by zopf · · Score: 1

      Good enzymes can catalyze reactions to millions of times their normal speed. With a complicated mixture of complementary enzymes, it could be possible to accelerate all of the necessary reactions to produce a fine wine. Flavor components could be synthesized to match those normally instilled from the wood casks or grapes. A fine wine could be synthesized through carefully controlled laboratory procedures - it would just take a hell of a lot of work.

      Perhaps in the coming years of bioinformatics and computational chemistry, we will be able to characterize all the components of wines or other solutions and automatically synthesize them using a huge database of available reagents and starting materials, but such technology is a decade away at least. Until then, I think we'll have to enjoy our fine wines at customary price and pride levels.

      --
      Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!
  27. Article wrong on basic science by meiocyte · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Platinum electrodes provide the juice, driving negative ions - the cause of acidity - from the wine into the water."


    wtf? Free protons (H+) or hydronium ions are the cause of acidity, not negative ions!

    --
    The thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; for the box might even be empty.
    1. Re:Article wrong on basic science by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      They could be referring to an acidic taste, not the pH of wine. As to how an electrode can reduce this taste, I have no idea.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Article wrong on basic science by typical · · Score: 1

      wtf? Free protons (H+) or hydronium ions [CC] are the cause of acidity, not negative ions!

      It takes two to tango.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    3. Re:Article wrong on basic science by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      I think it's a misnomer, actually. RTFA and you'll be able to figure what I've figured:

      The idea here is that the water takes on a negative charge, with reduces its surface tension. The wine, or rather, its non-water elements, get a positive charge. When they are recombined, the water molecules cluster around the alcohol and flavorants. The flavorants that are water soluble reintegrate with the water while the alcohol soluble flavorants stay trapped in their alcohol domiain/water shell.

      The idea is that this happens naturally, as the wine settles. Alcohol globules converge into small alcohol domains trapped by networks of water molecules. Since alcohol and water have specific gravities that are close enough that gravity has little say in the matter, yes, this is an appropriate conclusion as to how wine mellows. It does not, however, complexify it. That comes from the wooding of the wine; the water and alcohol dissolve the complex compounds found in the caramelized sublayer of charred wood.

      So yes, this machine does what it intends: it makes young wines more drinkable, which does, in fact, produce a better vintage (the quality of a vintage is entirely based on how it tastes). It does not, on the other hand 'roll back' the vintage or age the wine.

      It also does not automatically make a cheap wine more complex.

      That said, I'd like to use the machine. I make my own homebrew, and going more rapidly from grape juice to drinkable wine would be great; I wouldn't have to store so many bottles of the stuff.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  28. Japan is about 20 years behind the West... by KNicolson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...when it comes to fine, or even poor, wine. They still get a collective stiffie when Beaujolais Day comes around, and believe chilled is not an unusual way of serving normal non-Beaujolais reds.

    1. Re:Japan is about 20 years behind the West... by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

      They also like warming whisky before drinking it.

    2. Re:Japan is about 20 years behind the West... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      We used to in the UK (I used to do it for the event - the wine is OK, though). The novelty of it has worn off, though.

  29. WINE by wgmari · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So is this WINE an Emulator? I'm confused...

    1. Re:WINE by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      Wine Is Not Electrolyzed

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
  30. Didn't Prestone by thesk8ingtoad · · Score: 1

    Develop this technology years ago, but for legal reasons had to market the product instead as automobile antifreeze?

  31. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that is truly a fine example of what I call stupid logic. Fermenting + grains = beer?

    So I guess whisky is also a beer right?

    Idiot.

  32. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    I assume that you refuse to buy man-made diamonds as well? Despite the fact that you can't tell the difference and they cost quite a bit less?

  33. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Joebert · · Score: 0

    Slap a shinny label on it & ship it to the clubs.
    Rappers can have it selling for $50 a bottle in no time.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  34. Printing presses hurt profit, says monk by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    People nowadays might pay an awful lot for a genuine monk-painted illuminated manuscript. There probably are still a few on sale to exclusive customers. But do you think any modern book publisher would willing go back to small volume, high price? The bulk market is bigger.

  35. Sake prices might fall, if true by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    I like wine and hope it doesn't devalue the market much if this comes into existence.

    While I hope the same doesn't happen to sake, perhpaps, it will make it more popular. The problem with drinking sake outside of Japan, or at least in my experience in purchasing it in Canada, is that it is very expensive. There are $10 - $15 bottles which often taste like piss. The flavor is too strong (quite bitter actually) and over-powering when compared to the other (generally more expensive) sake. Though I've found some good ones for $15 or so.

    The more expensive sake goes through more processing so its more expensive. I've found some very nice wine for $10 or $15 some made in Europe, others in North America and abroad. I like wine and its easy to tell the poorly made stuff from the good. I avoid the $40+ bottles for money and value.

    Wine is made in many countries and is not exclusive to one country. Sake is AFAIK made only in Japan so it means that it is more expensive than more other liquors. Maybe this 'ageing machine' if it exists can lower the cost of some sake.

    1. Re:Sake prices might fall, if true by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Wine is made in many countries and is not exclusive to one country. Sake is AFAIK made only in Japan
      Scotch is only made in Scotland. The exact same product, made anywhere else, is called Whisky.

      Same type of thing goes on with cheeses and wines. If it isn't made in a certain region of the world, it doesn't get to use that name.

      Sake can be made anywhere in the world, but Japanese Sake is expensive outside Japan because of Japanese export tariffs on alcohol.

      Read this for more info: http://www.american.edu/TED/sake.htm
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Sake prices might fall, if true by o0Buddha0o · · Score: 0

      About 45 min west of Sydney there is a Sake Brewery. Personally i think the stuff tastes like crap but it nice to know Australia has something different.

    3. Re:Sake prices might fall, if true by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Informative. I did not know about the export tarriff. Thank you!

    4. Re:Sake prices might fall, if true by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Sake can be made anywhere in the world...

      This is actually untrue. I attempted to make it in Albuquerque about two years ago and, due to tradition, the yeast absolutely refused to begin fermentation.

  36. Wine? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why is this on here? We are nerds, we don't care about wine. It's moonshine we are interested in. Figuring out the fermination process, the complex weaving of pipes. Stealing the shit required out of the school lab....

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:Wine? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Why is this on here? We are nerds, we don't care about wine.

      If you think wine ain't for nerds, you haven't read enough about it. Just the first order chemical reactions which occur in wine are complex enough to fill a book. And what sort of geek wouldn't want to read a book chock full of chemical reactions?

      If it's just alcohol you seek, I suggest a trip to the liquor store for a bottle of something called Everclear. It's cheaper and purer than you could ever make it yourself.

    2. Re:Wine? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Christ on a crutch. Just when I tough one of my jokes would go ever perfectly, no to mention two, someone without a sense of humor has to crawl out from under their rock.

      Hey Sherlock, Mod +4, Funny. Apparently everyone else got it but you. Damn that sucks.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    3. Re:Wine? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I think a joke should have a reasonable premise. The premise that wine isn't interesting for nerds isn't reasonable. I do not begrudge you your +5 Funny, I'm just responding to something you said.

      Besides, plenty of posts are made in all seriousness and then end up at +5 Funny, even against the author's intent.

    4. Re:Wine? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Jesus man, get a life. Your bitching about a joke that you didn't get. Nothing else here to see.

      Move on, Move on.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    5. Re:Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAahahaha

      Your name sounds like Lord CRAPathy!

  37. Molecule clusters? Gimme a break! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The business about "water molecule clusters" in TFA sounds like nonsense from a chemical point of view. That simply isn't how wine aging works. Now, electrolysing wine certainly will have chemical effects, and it's at least halfway plausible that those effects could be similar to aging, and it's entirely probable that the reporter may not have accurately quoted the source... but the purported explanation for how it works doesn't sound like something that would come from people who had developed a technology that really did work.

  38. Oh ya heard this one before. by truckaxle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unfortunately these inventions are always bought up by the powerful french wine cartel and shelved. Or worse sometimes these inventors meet their untimely demise. So sad.

    1. Re:Oh ya heard this one before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I now suspect The Triplets of Belleville contained dark, hetofore hidden truths.

    2. Re:Oh ya heard this one before. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately these inventions are always bought up by the powerful french wine cartel and shelved. Or worse sometimes these inventors meet their untimely demise. So sad.

      I heard that this one guy came up with a process to turn water into wine and the wine industry had their puppets in the government arrest him on trumped up charges of fomenting unrest and temple vandalism and then executed. I hear he totally like faked his death and escaped, though.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  39. Bullshit by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmm.

    Tannins can be polymerised, compounds can be oxidised, but a large part of what makes a good wine good is what it absorbs from and loses to the barrel. Furthermore, oxidatisation doesn't occur evenly through a wine (tends to be more surface area effect than all the way through) which means that different parts of the wine in the barrel are different, and blending them adds complexity.

    This (a) can't work well, and (b) doesn't work. I've got some audiophile toys which I could write /. articles about too, but that doesn't make them effective.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  40. There are differences in wine by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    It seems that most of the comments belittle wine and wine drinkers as some sort of elitist group. I'm guessing that the people who are posting these comments have never actually tasted good wine, or don't appreciate it. That, however, doesn't mean the difference doesn't exist and is not obvious to even casual wine drinkers.
    For those who actually enjoy wine, the ability to recreate the aging process rapidly is a sort of holy grail. Aging mellows out the harsh elements of a fine wine and brings out a tremendous complexity. On the other hand, aging turns a weak wine dull and lifeless.

    1. Re:There are differences in wine by GoGoGadgetFeet · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The only reason I can justify buying an expensive Bordeaux or Burgundy is that I know I'll have several years of anticipation before I drink it. That's the whole point. That's what makes it fun... having a cellar full of slowly aging bottles. I could potentially see this device being used to make slightly better cheap wines. That might be a worthwhile use. But I pray that no one will ever put a good Bordeaux, Chianti, Malbec, or any other such wine through it.

    2. Re:There are differences in wine by humankind · · Score: 1

      For those who actually enjoy wine, the ability to recreate the aging process rapidly is a sort of holy grail.

      Aged wine is not necessarily the "holy grail" of winedom, getting wine to taste great and not cost a small fortune is. Aging is only a small part of this. It also has to do with the type of oak used and the quality of the grapes.

    3. Re:There are differences in wine by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "It seems that most of the comments belittle wine and wine drinkers as some sort of elitist group."

      I noticed that too. I wonder why.

      "I'm guessing that the people who are posting these comments have never actually tasted good wine, or don't appreciate it."

      Ok, I think I understand why now.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    4. Re:There are differences in wine by pclminion · · Score: 1
      No, he's not being elitist. Think of it this way. Here on Slashdot we have great flamewars about Linux vs. Apple vs. Microsoft. USB vs. FireWire. Etc. Most of the rest of the world could really care less about this -- they want a computer that works. And yet, there are true differences, advantages and disadvantages between these things.

      The fact that we want to discuss these details, details which most "normal" people do not care about, does not make us elitist. It makes us specialists. A wine connoisseur is just the same -- he or she is simply looking at and pondering details which most people would overlook.

      Sometimes these people can seem overbearing, talking too much about wine (or computers, as the case may be). Again, this does not make them elitist. They talk about what they love. Surely we've all met the Linux geek who fervently tries to convert every Windows user he encounters, because he honestly thinks it will be better for the user? Maybe it's misguided, but it's rooted in the desire to help other people, not elitism.

      Don't confuse the sort of people and behavior you observe at a wine tasting room, with the act of tasting wine. What do those stupid antics have to do with the quality of the wine? Not much...

      Personally, I'm a beer "snob" because I brew my own and try to sample everything I can get my hands on. Sometimes I push for a person to try something new because I genuinely believe that they'll like it. I'm trying to spread the wealth, not condescend.

      Sorry for the meandering post.

  41. FastTrack? Wine? by shine-shine · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who scratched his head, thikning why, and how, would FastTrack (i.e. KaZaA) fine (as in "impose a fine") Wine (i.e. Wine Is Not an Emulator)? Sheesh.

    1. Re:FastTrack? Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably.

      Loser.

    2. Re:FastTrack? Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're like the ninth. Try reading the comments, next time, instead of scratching your head so much.

  42. Wine Smine by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, wine. Keep your fine wine, give me a good bourbon or a scotch any way. You keep your wine, I'll keep my scotch and I can be drunk and passout on the floor in half the time you can.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:Wine Smine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ha, that reminds me of a quote from the late Mitch Hedberg:

      I like to drink red wine. This girl says "Doesn't red wine give you a headache?" "Yeah, eventually! But the first and the middle part are amazing." I'm not gonna stop doing something 'cause of what's gonna happen at the end. "Mitch, you want an apple?" "No, eventually it'll be a core."
    2. Re:Wine Smine by lifeisgreat · · Score: 0

      Testify! It's good to see others that have wised up to wine's pro-abortion nature.

      Yes, wine was invented by Jesus Christ some 1,980 years ago in the Middle East, to sate a crowd of his followers. Several of Satan's most liberal servants realised that people would associated wine with miracles (no doubt they'd be in marketing today!), and went about tainting man's attempts at recreating the divine drink. Now it's just a pungent chemical broth that does little but weaken women's resistance to the sweet song of the liberal abortion doctor, no doubt Satan's most dangerous still-living servant.

      It's no surprise to me that to this day, wine connoisseurs are exclusively liberal to the point that wine tastings are kicked off with a ceremonial abortion. No doubt a perversion of a ribbon-cutting, but who can fathom the mind of an abortionist?

      Stay strong.

    3. Re:Wine Smine by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Bah!
      I'm a change begging street bum type wino...you insensetive clod!

      With this miraclous newfangled contraption, now even I too can now afford to have a sophisticated palate! ;)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  43. I can't believe it isn't butter! by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

    I can't believe it isn't butt..err.. wine!.. butter wine? I'm so confused.

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
    1. Re:I can't believe it isn't butter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butt wine!

  44. Re:Molecule clusters? Gimme a break! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
    ... but the purported explanation for how it works doesn't sound like something that would come from people who had developed a technology that really did work.

    Either that, or the people who developed the new process have no idea how it works and don't know enough about chemistry to realize their "explanation" doesn't make any sense. Imaging what kind of explanation the chinese came up with for how black powder works, back when they first discovered it. It probably makes as much sense now as the one in TFA.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  45. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
    Now that is truly a fine example of what I call stupid logic. Fermenting + grains = beer?
    It would be if it was brewed instead of distilled. Try brewed + grain, not fermented + grain. Beer is brewed; whisky (and whiskey) is distilled. Look it up.
    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
  46. Electrolyze? by taboguilla · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to comment on the machine or its merits, since the article was nice and fluffy like a new down pillow. I wish they would have included maybe some properly conducted taste tests or maybe some lab essays on how (if at all) the wine changed after it passed the machine. What I did find interesting was the word "Electrolyse", which if they are using the correct definition means they are subjecting the wine to electrolysis. Mind you, I am no chemist and know nothing about wine, however I do have some hands on experience in large business and it me that any Joe Schmoe without his machine could just say "Gee thanks Bob, but we aren't interested..." and plug in a cathode and an electrode a beaker full of wine and start to experiment with different voltages and times and have a really good time testing their results. These days distillers have staffs of chemists and it wouldn't cost them any more or any less to say,"Hey Pete! Put that PhD. in chem of yours to good use and electrolyze some of that Night Train Express you got there and then if you don't go blind after you drink it we'll send it to a tasting panel." Plus, I don't think you can patent electrolysis...see child-hood chemistry sets for prior art. :-D

  47. This make no sense with a beaujolais nouveau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just nonsense.

    Beaujolais Nouveau is deliberately not aged (so as to not release tannins). Even once it has been delivered to your shelves, it is meant to be consumed right away. It is specifically designed to be a light, almost fruity red, rather than a strong, full-bodied expensive and long-aged wine like say a bordeux. Applying a technology to age it... completely misses the point of this varietal.

    1. Re:This make no sense with a beaujolais nouveau by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

      Beaujolais is not a varietal, it's a region.

      Other than take couldn't agree with you more ^_^

  48. Wines do taste different by caluml · · Score: 1

    I was in Argentina recently, and any of their red wines (vino tinto) tasted better than the wines we get in the UK*. That doesn't mean that I can tell if one is oak-matured, or full-bodied, or has a fruity bouquet - but I can tell that Wine A tastes better, and has less of a nasty aftertaste than Wine B.
    I brought back two bottles of San Felicien Cabernet Sauvignon - mmmm, that stuff is good. Hic.

    * I don't spend a lot on wines here - I'm sure if you spend £50 or up, you can get decent wine here.

  49. Beer?! by anti_analog · · Score: 1

    I wonder what happens when one runs Beer through this machine.

    And I don't mean Budwieser and the like, I mean Imperal IPAs, Imperial Stouts, Belgian's of all kinds, English strong ales, etc, the kinds of beer that I have aging in my "beer cellar" right now.
    I've had some suprising success aging beers (my oldest is probably 10 months) removing mild skunk and metallic flavours, mellowing, bring out some subtle dark fruitiness, and it would be nice to be able to do that faster!

    I don't think most american microbreweries who make such products would be "above" using such devices either, as long as they actually work. Of course, you won't get the character of wood aging (vanillin!) with such a device.

    --
    you cannot dodge the quad laser. jumping is useless.
    1. Re:Beer?! by maino82 · · Score: 1

      if you even try and touch my belgium beers i will have you flogged and strung up for all the townsfolk to see. mmmm... peche lembic..... framboise..... affligen trippel.... can heaven get any closer to earth? i think not.

  50. Re:Beaujolais Nouveau is SUPPOSED to be drank fres by smchris · · Score: 1



    Indeed. Quite a few posts before we get to your's pointing that out,

    Seems an odd choice. Probably cheaper than cabernet but not as cheap as other varietals if he just wants to experiment with artifically inducing aging.

  51. Re:shochu? too bad by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

    I also live in Japan and I have to say that most Japanese simply don't "get" wine.

    The locally produced wine is so sweet it's simply undrinkable (although the busloads of grannies that visit our local winery tend to disagree with me).

    Also Beaujolais is a Hype (with a capital H) product over here, just like champagne is in the west at New Year.
    When the first shipment of Beaujolais Nouveau is permitted to go on sale many Japanese who normally don't drink wine and have no idea what it should (or could) taste like will happily splurge out on a $30 bottle of Beaujolais at the nearest combini (7-11) because it's considered very cool to do so.

  52. Not all cheap wines age badly. by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 1

    Back in 1981, I bought my wine-buff brother a bottle of $2.95 moselle as a joke. (It was Ben Ean, for those Australians reading this.) To return the favour, he laid it down, and opened it nine years later on my 30th birthday.

    The years had been kind to it. It was almost a dessert wine; thick, golden yellow, and sweet. Frankly, it was very good. Certainly a lot better than when bought.

    On the other hand, I had some Merlot turn into vinegar very quickly. Come to think of it, I still have a bottle of that stuff in the cupboard. I dread opening it.

    1. Re:Not all cheap wines age badly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the cupboard ? Well that would explain the vinegar taste. If you don't have a cellar with somewhat cool temperature, I would advise you don't keep a bottle there for more than a few months.

  53. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Who. The. Fuck. Cares.

    Judging by your overly hostile response, I'd have to say you did.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  54. Re:shochu? too bad by DonnieD701 · · Score: 1

    I really enjoyed Sochu when I was stationed in Okinawa back in the 80's. Mixed with tea, it was more enjoyable on a hot Okinawan day than Saki.. It reminded me of the Korean drink Soju. That was normally mixed with Oscar wine, fruit juice and Hawiian Punch, as a drink called an "Ammo Bowl" It was served in a large bowl with ice, and alot of straws. The drinkers of the bowl would link the straws together and all drink from the bowl at the same time. Ahh, those were the drunken days!

    --
    A witty saying proves nothing. Voltaire (1694-1778)
  55. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Good point. There very well may be a good market for this at home, provided it's made affordable to people who do it as a hobby.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  56. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    I agree with you too. Mind you, the people who listen to rappers at clubs probably don't know the difference between a good wine, and a bad wine. You could probably dupe them in any number of ways.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  57. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    I assume that you refuse to buy man-made diamonds as well? Despite the fact that you can't tell the difference and they cost quite a bit less?

    Yeah, notice how you never see artifical diamonds in jewelry. The diamond cartels have "educated" people into thinking A) diamonds are rare, and B) manufactured diamonds are inferior. Even if this questionable/crazy contraption does work, it'll never be accepted by the "wine industry".

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  58. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    I've not actually bought a diamond yet, so I couldn't say for sure. I would probably ask an expert on diamonds (we have a few rock hounds in the family) to help me with that decision.

    What I wouldn't do, is take the word of some random slashdot poster. Research is key to not getting yourself screwed over.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  59. WINE by ClamIAm · · Score: 3, Funny

    This Wine Is Not Emulated.

  60. Shochu? I liked shochu by greenmars · · Score: 1

    I did a "junior year abroad" in Tokyo during 1985-86. I liked shochu a lot because when I drank A LOT of it, suddenly it was a lot easier to speak and think in Japanese. Never did figure out why, but I sure remember the sensation of being able to remember exactly the right word at conversation speed. My Japanese roommates thought it was funny as hell and took me out for shochu quite a bit.

  61. Important effects overlooked by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Insightful
    FTA:
    In the natural maturation process, the taste of wine is enhanced by the mixture of alcohol with water molecule clusters, Tanaka says.

    Though the exact mechanism of water molecule clusters remain a matter of scientific debate, Tanaka claims the electrolysis treatment instantaneously breaks up water clusters in the wine, allowing the water to more thoroughly blend with the alcohol.

    AFAIK, there's a lot more than this to wine maturation. One important effect is esterification of carboxylic acids and alcohols, which produces entirely new aromas. In lab conditions it is possible to esterify substances in a few minutes using strong catalysts such as sulphuric acid and high temperatures, but it takes months or years in a wine cellar.

    Besides, as others have mentioned already, it's silly to try and mature Beaujolais Noveau, as it's meant to be enjoyed straight away after production.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Important effects overlooked by putko · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Isn't that the stuff that can make port (or other wines) smell/taste like chocolate, cherry, vanilla, etc.?

      That is a truly amazing experience -- everyone should go in with some friends on a $200+ bottle of port, just once in their lives, to experience this.

      I belive the machine may work -- afterall, we are just talking chemistry here. Wine is a chemical, not some magical stuff. I wish him luck!

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  62. Taste - Good and interesting are both valuable by billstewart · · Score: 1

    So Beryllium Sphere doesn't get wine or wine-drinking. There are good $5 wines, there are old and dead $100 wines, there are ok $5 wines which will be really good if you stick them in the cellar for 5 years. Sure, some wine-drinkers are just snobs, but it's really mostly about taste. And then there's wine that you're drinking with food, vs. wine that you're drinking by itself. Trader Joe's "Two Buck Chuck" (Charles Shaw) wines don't usually have a lot of complexity, but they're also the most recent year's vintage - keep it around a while - or just treat it as something to have with an average dinner when you might not have bothered getting out the better wine.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Taste - Good and interesting are both valuable by ces · · Score: 1

      Ick ... the Charles Shaw wines I've had haven't been all that good (in fact the Cabernet I had tasted like drain cleaner). Much better to pay a couple of dollars more and buy some cheap Aussie, Washington, or California wine.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  63. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by odysseyandoracle · · Score: 1

    Whisky is essentially distilled beer.

  64. Wrong Approach by juliao · · Score: 1

    They're using the wrong approach if they're trying to sell it to vintners. This shouldn't be marketed as a way to _replace_ ageing, but rather as a way to complement it. If it can make a not-so-good wine much better, imagine what this wine will be like after you allow it to age in the traditional way.

    1. Re:Wrong Approach by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it will be vinegar

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  65. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Pendersempai · · Score: 1
    Let's try your idea out on another invention and see what the result is!

    All a cotton gin like this is going to do is make your fabric worth less. A good fabric is expensive because of the labor it takes to make it. If all of the sudden you're pumping them out like cans of coke, you're going to have cheap fabric regardless of its quality. People need to remember there is a huge traditional following where cotton making is concerned. People who truly appreciate fine fabrics will not buy stuff which breaks from traditional cotton making.

    There you have it, folks! Down with the cotton gin!

  66. Aussie wines by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Now if anyone could explain what it is about Australian whites that can invariably give me a headache with only one glass....??

    Most exported "Australian whites" are wooded Chardonnays (aged in (French) oak). Try an unwooded Chardonnay, or a Sauvignon blanc instead. You'll notice the difference.

    Since alcohol will dehydrate you, always drink a couple of glasses of water after enjoying wine.

    1. Re:Aussie wines by smchris · · Score: 1

      It would certainly add a range of chemicals. My first reaction is to think that I've had many well-aged wines without the same invariable headache but perhaps I should pay more careful attention to chardonney and wooding in particular.

      Not the worst thing that can happen. You've heard about the occasional Italian distributor who adds antifreeze to his chianti for that extra fullness? I consumed a bottle of Argentinian red one Friday night in 1989 (by way of saying my _weekly_ bottle of wine, just in that night) and was experiencing acute loss of liver function by Saturday night. Working temporarily out of town my choice of medical care was catch-as-catch-can and between the GP I picked from the phone book and the emergency room's bloodwork we only determined that it was my liver and I didn't have hepatitis. There are some odd events that can cause that sort of thing but the time frame makes the wine suspect.

      Livers good! Really took the wind out of me for many weeks.

      [Oh, and it was the three-store "status name" liquor chain for that metro -- so you never know.]

    2. Re:Aussie wines by BJH · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the Italian wine and antifreeze, but a while back there was a problem with methyl alcohol (not ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol) being added to certain Eatern European wines. Quite a few people suffered blindness and other effects, I believe.

    3. Re:Aussie wines by BJH · · Score: 1

      Uh... of course, that should be "Eastern", not "Eatern" :(

    4. Re:Aussie wines by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Also try their cheap Shiraz; I've never gotten a headache from a cheap Australian Shiraz - and they're damned good too (Favorite: Little Penguin, ironically enough)

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    5. Re:Aussie wines by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't drink enough of the stuff. I've had some exceptionally fine headaches from Australian shiraz. (It's the second bottle that does it ...)

      I've not had any Little Penguin, though. Where's it from? (Open Sauce?)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    6. Re:Aussie wines by smchris · · Score: 1

      I'm too old for the second bottle these days so I just might try that. I think I've noticed shiraz getting some print lately and it has been a while for me with positive memories.

    7. Re:Aussie wines by smchris · · Score: 1

      I'm owned by a cat so I know that you keep them away from parking lots. Apparently, antifreeze has a rich, full-bodied sweetness.

    8. Re:Aussie wines by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      You're _never_ too old for the second bottle (unless you have to work in the morning).

      Australian shiraz is definitely the food of the gods. Even the cheap shit is pretty good. (We are truly blessed in this place, gods' own country.)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    9. Re:Aussie wines by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Not sure. Where are the penguins in Australia?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    10. Re:Aussie wines by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Along parts of the south coast, also Kangaroo Island and (probably) Tasmania.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  67. Re:shochu? too bad by Intocabile · · Score: 1

    Well the Japanese's love for ice wine probably has something to do with the local wines being made sweet. They don't have the food to go with a nice wine. Even if you go to a Italian restaurant you'll end up with a Japanese bastardization of Italian food that will never the less still taste good. I can drink wine by itself, but you can't fully enjoy it without an appropriate meal.

  68. Re:shochu? too bad by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Shochu is popular because it's a good way to get a large number of people drunk cheaply.

    It's certainly not because it's a particularly good drink.

  69. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Devalue? Think of all the bum-wine makers who can suddenly increase the value of their product?

  70. Re:shochu? too bad by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

    Even if you go to a Italian restaurant you'll end up with a Japanese bastardization of Italian food that will never the less still taste good. True, but I don't think I want to try Natto Spaghetti ever again... ^_^

  71. Dehidrated water by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine how much one can save if the wine is made with dehidrated water to reduce shipping costs and then zap treated into quality wine...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Dehidrated water by hakr89 · · Score: 1

      dehydrated water??? If you can figure out how to make that, you won't be worrying about shipping costs.

    2. Re:Dehidrated water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read of something similar to doing this being done by distillars for other spirits. Apparently, alchohol is alchohol, you can distill it to its pure form, and add the flavor back, and actually get something better and less likely to cause a hangover.

  72. but price is still not a great predictor by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    To take your scotch example, many novice drinkers prefer the expensive blended Johnny Walker Blue (~$150-180/bottle), whereas there are many cheaper (often sub-$75) bottles of single malt that scotch aficionados would prefer.

    1. Re:but price is still not a great predictor by chicagotypewriter · · Score: 1

      Sub-$75 single malt scotch example: The Glenlivet (aged 18 year version), I'd take that any day. I want to say it costs like $64.

  73. Sho Chiku Bai is made in California since 1982 by It's+Pat · · Score: 0

    No, there is a very popular sake made here in Berkeley, California since 1982: Sho Chiku Bai. I have tasted this sake and it is good, but I wouldn't pretend to be a sake expert. I like to have warm sake with sushi from time to time. Here's the website regarding Sho Chiku Bai: http://www.takarasake.com/products/sake.htm/

  74. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you do buy a diamond, please accept the fact, now, that you will have paid too much, and also come to terms with that your money was just about thrown away for a shiny piece of dirt. Also, if a woman *needs* jewelry to feel valued in the relationship...find another woman, because the truth is she loves the jewelry more than she loves you.

    (of course, switch the gender pronouns if you are a woman and/or gay)

  75. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Razor+Sex · · Score: 1
    "A good well-aged wine is expensive because of the time it takes to make it."


    Followed by

    "People who truly appreciate fine wines will not buy stuff which breaks from traditional wine making."


    People who truly appreciate fine wines thus only appreciate it's age and prestige? Bingo.
  76. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha! Hostile? You indeed live a sheltered existence. The comment was uncouth perhaps, rude in a way, but hardly hostile. 6th graders often elicit more hostility durng their lunch break or mid day recess.

    Indeed, you made my evening. Hostile...

    Let's pray (oh, perhaps hope for you religious haters) that the comment didn't make anyone cry or shiver perhaps quake with fear. Oh, that big mean poster dude! Next he may send a sternly written letter. Oh the madness. Indeed, we should bottle such unbridled energies and unleash them upon our most dangerous adversaries such as the care bears or perhaps that tart, Ms. Strawberry Shortcake. Damn her.

    Your comment about rappers was cute. Are you a closet racist? God knows those kind of people (wink, wink) couldn't possibly know a good wine from a bad one. Imagine! listening to a rapper in a club... My god... http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174743&cid=145 35664

  77. Re:Beaujolais Nouveau is SUPPOSED to be drank fres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Atually, Beaujolais Nouveau tastes like crap wether it's fresh or not. It's marketing hype for wine that wasn't worth crap, and Japan (where I live) has it the worst. I assume that the most bottles of exported Beaujolais Nouveau comes to Japan.

    Trying to age a beaujolais is simply laughable though. So yes, I agree with you.

    Now give me my bottle of Bordeaux back!!

  78. Re:shochu? too bad by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I drank shochu when I was in Japan; I liked the flavored ones (shiso flavor is nice) and mixed drinks but I agree, by itself it is terrible. It's as good a mixer as vodka though because it's a clear flavor and it accentuates other flavors you mix it with. I'm surprised I haven't seen it in the US. Korean Soju, however, is pretty popular on the west coast, mostly because some enterprising lobbyist got the state of CA to pass a law declaring Soju is in the same category as wine for bar licensing purposes (meaning it can be sold with only a beer/wine license). Like Shochu, it pretty much sucks on its own, but it's a good clear mixer. I've never drank them side by side but I suspect they are actually basically the same drink.

  79. MOD PARENT UP, shenanigans on the 'wine zapper.' by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
    Agreed. BN is harvested during the summerish time, and is ready to drink by the time November rolls around. Wines made from carbonic maceration (generally how 'nouveau' wines are made) are not even designed to be tannic anyway. I wouldn't want to drink BN after spring, especially considering poor storage conditions of most retail establishments would spoil the wines quickly due to it's lack of tannins which act as a preservative. Note: I only say this from experience, so I am unable to back up anything I say. I've stored both wines that are tannic and others that are not. Non-tannic wines (like Pinot Noir for example) are much more sensitive to external conditions (exposure to light, change in temperature, the oxygen and cork conditions along with other stuff in the bottle already) tend to go bad much more quickly. Also, when was the last time you've heard wine retailers sell you white wine - which have less tannins then most reds - that are designed to be stored long term? You can probably list some exceptions, but those are the very rare ones.

    Not all wines are made the same. Some wines are made to be consumed immediately, and those wines are NOT designed for long term storage. Others, are the very opposite; If you consume them immediately, they will taste amazingly tannic and harsh, to which is better to hold off on drinking them and put them into storage so that the tannins break down to 'smooth' out the wine. (and yes, that is the 'technical' term according to me :-P)

    When some guy approaches me and tells me he can take BN, put it thru a machine, and have it taste like a 1st Growth Bordeaux that's been aged 15 years, I call shenanigans. That's like taking Bud Light, putting in thru the machine, and having produced aged Lager.

    A more interesting test sample would have been to use an 'expensive' wine with heavy harsh tannins (like a Rothchild, or even Petrus). Take a vintage from 2005, zap it, and drink it side by side to a same maker's product that's been aged like 20-30 years or so, AND drinking it side by side to a fresh bottle from 2005 to see the differece between a zapped and non-zapped wine of the same year.

    Not to be a total Debbie Downer, but I bet the reason why the BN has even got 'smoother' in the first place is due to it's exposure to air, resulting in some alcohol evaporation along with initial chemical change from the exposure to oxygen and other things resulting in some of the harshness to go away (similar to how the decanting process can smooth out the wine a bit). Remember, BN is designed to be consumed immediately, and spoils quickly.

    I apologize for any redundancy in the post, its late...

  80. BAD IDEA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me how SAB (South African Breweries) make their terrible beers.
    Basically it's a concentrate powder that you just-add-water to, The only quality you get is the hangover!

  81. Re:Beaujolais Nouveau is SUPPOSED to be drank fres by Serzen · · Score: 1

    To top it all, it's traditionally reccomended that any Nouveau that hasn't been consumed by January 1st should be destroyed.

  82. Re:Smells like piss to me by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    The Japanese have an awful taste in alcoholic drinks matched only by the Chinese and the Koreans.

    Sochu and sake remind me of watered down homemade bootleg and the stuff they drink in prison, respectively.

    Anything they can do to make these taste better is okay in my book, though I doubt it to be possible.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  83. Re:shochu? too bad by JPyun · · Score: 1

    Probably reminded you of Soju because they're the exact same thing. Both are distilled liquors, usually of rice, barley or sweet potato. If you thought they were much different tasting, it's probably because you got a sweet potato soju and a rice shochu or something. But I digress.

    Soju has a relatively storied history, coming to Korea from the Mongolians in the 13th century, and spreading throughout asian from there, but you really can't find many good sojus nowadays. The last one to be really good, in my opinion, is Chamnamutong Malgeun Sul from Jinro. Unfortunately, I don't think they make it any more. All of the newer sojus are pretty much the equivalent of boxed wine (sort of). Cheap, strong, and for the sole purpose of getting drunk off your ass.

  84. Author's also not a chemist or wine expert by billstewart · · Score: 1
    "Though the exact mechanism of water molecule clusters remain a matter of scientific debate" and "electrolyzed wine is healthier because it doesn't oxidize easily", i.e. it's made-up bogus nonsense trying to sound scientific, and you can get your snake nice and oily with it, especially if you're wearing your pyramid-shaped tinfoil hat at the time. Probably electrolyzing the wine does make some changes that affect the flavor - so would cooking, or mixing in oxygen. It's not uncommon for wine to improve if you open the bottle and let it air out a bit - that lets some of the unpleasant gasses than might have accumulated escape, and lets a bit of air dissolve into the wine. While that's more noticeable on older wines than really young ones, that's still probably one of the main effects that his system is actually doing.

    To the extent that Japanese Shochu is similar to Korean Soju, it usually needs all the help it can get :-) That's actually a bit unfair - soju is hooch made from whatever's available, which may be sweet potatoes or barley or millet, but some of it's quite drinkable, especially cold with spicy Korean food. It's typically about 25% alcohol.

    But affecting vodka? Vodka's pretty much straight ethanol and water, and if there's any difference between fancy vodka and cheap vodka other than fancy bottles and marketing campaigns, it's that the fancy vodka has has been distilled and filtered a bit more so there's slightly less of the longer-chain alcohols left over or maybe the water that it's diluted with after distilling has slightly different impurities in it. That's much much different from the processes involved in aging wine, where all the complex materials are there and they chemically change over time, for example through oxidation. Maybe if the water in the vodka has a bit of salt in it the electrolysis will let out some of the chloride and just leave the sodium hydroxide flavor, but there's not likely to be much effect there.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  85. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    The best part about anonymous posts is it's impossible to take them all too seriously.

    I will understand if you prefer to hide under a blanket, with the lights out, in your mother's basement. If I was making comments like that, I wouldn't want to put my name to it either.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  86. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    You know, it's less about a woman needing it, and more about wanting to do something for her. I'm by no means a traditionalist when it comes to that kind of thing, but when the time comes, I'll do it for her because I want to, not because I have to. Besides, it's not like everyone here is flipping burgers for a living. Some of us can afford to throw a bit of money away on that kind of thing.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  87. Re:MOD PARENT UP, shenanigans on the 'wine zapper. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    That's like taking Bud Light, putting in thru the machine, and having produced aged Lager.

    That's rather easy to do, you just have to regularly replace the keg of lager and empty the bucket of Bud.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  88. Garbage In - Garbage Out by humankind · · Score: 2, Informative

    This device is bogus. I've tried many of the so-called "aging devices" and they don't work. Tasting Notes don't lie. You cannot take cheap wine and make it good. Wine is only as good as the grapes, care and resources that went into producing it.

    That's not to say you can't make wine taste different, and it's well known that even marginal red wine, if "aged" will change its taste and sensory profile. Sometimes this is better, sometimes it is worse. But thousands of years has shown that a wine's aging potential is related to its initial quality and care.

    This doesn't stop people from trying to come up with goofy devices though. However, if you want to "age" wine, just leave it in your car for a little while. I won't promise it will taste better, but it will have more mileage on it.

  89. Marcel Vogel by 4Dmonkey · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Marcel Vogel of IBM, who discovered a method to age wines in seconds using quartz crystals. Unfortunately its seen as psuedoscience.

    --
    God created man in his own image, but somehow he evolved into a hairless monkey.
  90. Good debunking of bad science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a good debunking of a similar wine aging device, see

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/badscience/story/0, 12980,1656827,00.html

    There is an amusing report of a proper double-blind trial. Conclusion? Doesn't make any difference.

  91. Shochu Snobbery by benher · · Score: 1

    Shochu is not necessarily made with sweet potato. It can be distilled with anything from potatoes, sweet or otherwise, to rice and wheat. As one might imagine, the flavor differs greatly. Most "sweet" potato shochu is distilled from "Satsuma-imo" (Satsuma Potatoes) in Kagoshima in southern Kyushu. (though other distilleries exist in other prefectures)

  92. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    you're going to have cheap wine regardless of how it tastes

    And what else really matters?

    I've been to Bordeaux and seen how they make great claret, and certain traditions they use. But I also believe that many of those traditions are about maintaining quality. They often stick with traditions because it's always worked for them, and spending extra on a more traditional way of doing something is acceptable. But, if they can improve the wine by employing technology, they will.

  93. Not a new scam, either by typical · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing random things every now and then from people who claim to have devices or processes to instantly age wine. This is not a new scam.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  94. Fake wine in one-gallon bottle good for dance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    May I seriously recommend that Mr. Tanaka visit Hungary? He will be able to sell hundreds if not thousands of his equipment in a few days. Hungary, a country in Central Europe is the wine-faking centre of the world. Although Hungary has very good wine regions of its own (Tokaji Aszu and Eger Bull-blood wines), the habit of faking became fashionable in the 1970s, when USSR ordered the COMECOM countries to send astronimical amounts of wine to Moscow to combat vodka abuse, thinking wine will not hurt russian brain cells that much. It was not possible to fullfil the giant quantity of orders without discarding even the most basic rules of honest winery. Let me say grape had absolutely no role or presence in the end product, but it looked and tasted like wine (somewhat).

    Even though COMECON ceased to exist in 1990, the wine faking is still a huge underground business in Hungary. Literally underground, most of the shack factories use buried railway tank waggons to mix and store fake wine. Still it takes weeks to make the stuff and there is a big risk customs authorities finding out and storming them. With Mr. Tanaka's equipment they could make it in a few hours and quckly sell it. Fake wine is usually sold in 5liter (1 gallon) plastic bottles, many homeless people drink two bottles a day. There is even a popular mocking song that celebrates this phenomenon.

    Big business with almost no cost, but good profit. Mr. Tanaka would be rich in no time.

  95. I've got a bridge to sell you... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    Part of the cachet of drinking fine wines is that it is expensive and exclusive. Once you start allowing the hoi polloi to have access, it no longer becomes so special.

    Bullshit. It's still the same product. Just because everyone else can enjoy something doesn't detract from my enjoyment of it.

    We have some great ales here in the UK, and people here are fanatical about them (The Campaign for Real Ale is about the most successful consumer organisation in the UK). People wax lyrical about them, festivals are held for them, drinkers will discuss the "hoppiness" of a beer and a few people I know get quite serious about seeking out pubs with unusual ales. However, none of this is about price (even the most expensive Belgian Trappist beers are only double the price of regular ale).

  96. A dream for Derek Trotter by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    Barman: Can I get you anything, Sir? Del: I'll have a bottle of Beaujolais Nouveau. Barman: Yes, Sir. Del: A '79.

  97. Re:Beaujolais Nouveau is SUPPOSED to be drank fres by Vengeance · · Score: 1

    Heh. I couldn't believe how long it took for this basic point to be made.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  98. Native by mercedo · · Score: 1
    Thanks to a recent revolutionary development in biotechnology, it is possible to make a tasty wine just in one night by adding pinch of additives.

    But that doesn't change the fact that Scotch in Scotland, Bourbon in Kentucky, Sake in Fushimi, Shochu in Satsuma are the best.

    --
    Ancient Greek Philosophers -18c Enlightenment Thinkers -Slashdotters
  99. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which means they share characteristic, but that does not make them the same. They also have important categorical differences. Carbonation and alcohol content being good examples. The closest western analog for sake is wine. Anyone who thinks it's beer, apparently fails one the more important sections of any typical IQ test.

  100. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sake refers to a wide range of drinks, including distilled versions. They're all generally referred to as wine though. Calling sake "beer" is idiotic becasue there isn't engough similarity in creation methods to merit it, nor is the final outcome more similar to beer than wine. Overall, the creation of the drink and the final product is more similar to wine. Idiots on /. What else is new.

  101. It can work with neutrons. by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1
    I think this was researched in the sixties. Apparently, if you stick brandy or sherry into a high neutron flux reactor, then it comes out having all the symptoms of having been aged. However, there was no market for Nuits St Three Mile Island, or rather (as many other people have pointed out) if you take away the exclusivity of the product, then your profit margins disappear.

    This neutron stuff may seem like an urban myth, but I know some people who repeated the experiment in the eighties with a Ministry of Defence reactor that is sometimes used for colouring sapphires, and other strange jobs to earn a buck. They lowered in a bottle of Spanish rotgut brandy, left it there for a fortnight, and what they pulled out was a lot lighter, and smoother tasting. So, it can be done.

  102. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by odysseyandoracle · · Score: 1

    Because it's high in alcohol? I've drunken beers with an ABV of as high as 25% - higher than any brewed sake I've seen. Because it's not carbonated? The beer the Sumerians drank wasn't carbonated. Because it's made with rice instead of barley malt? You might want to stop by the Anheuser-Busch breweries sometime. Because it's drunken warmer? So are the stronger beers. The only real justification that you have for calling sake a wine is because everyone else calls it a wine. A good comparison here is with the tomato. Yes, the tomato is used and subjectively feels more like a vegetable. That doesn't make it actually a vegetable. Do you also think malt liquor is actually liquor?

  103. The Adversary wins again; I chuckle by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    I know I'm very unpopular for taking the "old man's stance" on a lot of issues- they've never taken a single article I've suggested (even though they fall into the much-disussed guidelines) and it's largely because I'm conservative, and the rest of you are young farts that DIDN'T start in computers before the Microsoft corporation.

    But I have to chuckle at this. "Wine" as we now call it, is the name for "rancid wine" from the times of old. The scriptures hold that "wine" (grape juice, these days) should not be held until later, when it gets "the bite like fire".

    Sure Christ and pals drank lots of wine...mostly because Mountain Dew was a few years off; they drank grape juice. To drink it after it ferments was just a liquid form of temtation.

    This is where you guys retort with all the powerful uses of wine and other spirits and call me a neo-con or something, but face it: a LOT of people die on the roads. A lot of people die when they stay too late, going home drunk with another man's woman. It's caused immense pain and suffering, no matter how good it might smell, or how many other adults think it's ok.

    I just have to chuckle at this development; a faster way to cause that problem, now that so many other ways are clearly blocking our view of what's important.

    And I'm not gonna bore you with a message you won't respond to; I'm just gonna chuckle. These are modern times, after all. You all know better than I! :)

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:The Adversary wins again; I chuckle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late. You did. And so did I :(

    2. Re:The Adversary wins again; I chuckle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where you guys retort with all the powerful uses of wine and other spirits and call me a neo-con or something, but face it: a LOT of people die on the roads. A lot of people die when they stay too late, going home drunk with another man's woman. It's caused immense pain and suffering, no matter how good it might smell, or how many other adults think it's ok.

      You say you are a conservative? Try this on for size; the concretes have been changed to expose the guilty:

      This is where you guys retort with all the powerful uses of GUNS and other WEAPONS and call me a SOCIALIST or something, but face it: a LOT of people die on the STREETS. A lot of people die when they GET SHOT, going home with another man's woman ONLY TO MEET THAT MAN. It's caused immense pain and suffering, no matter how good it might smell, or how many other adults think it's ok.

      When your brain has rebooted after the crash, come on back and try again.

      Face it: if people can be trusted to own guns and handle them properly, they can be trusted to handle their liquor. the principle is the SAME.

      Alcohol doesn't kill people, people get drunk.

  104. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by mike77 · · Score: 1
    but I think there's a huge home market possibility

    being a home winemaker myself, I'm going to have to disagree with you. I think if the price is small, there will be some usage of a machine like this, however I doubt it will really catch on. Most home winemakeers have dual purposes. I make wine because I enjoy it, and because I enjoy the process. The time, and effort I have to put into my wine makes me enjoy it all the more. If I could produce an aged wine in a few months, what's the point? But when I take 2 months for fermentation, a year or two of racking and ageing, another year of ageing in a barrel (or whatever) and testing the taste over time, that is where a good wine comes from. Not a "quick fix" machine.

    Remember, making wine is not just about the final product, it's also about the journey.

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  105. reverse osmosis and pulsed light by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1
    Beaujolais Nouveau is supposed to be a very bright, aggressive, raw table wine... it's not supposed to be refined and subtle. It wouldn't take much to make it mellower or more complex.

    Be that as it may, the size of the machine and the very limited description of how it works suggests they're doing two things.

    First, it's probably being treated with a pulsed light system:

    The pulsed light systems affect only the surface of the product being treated. Photoproducts resulting from this treatment are much fewer than those produced by thermal treatments, thus minimizing product degradation. Pulsed light treatment has been reported to be effective in extending the shelf life of foods such as bread, shrimp and meats (26). Pulsed light is effective in treating water, owing to the transparency of water and the fact that it permits the penetration of light. The reported costs of equipment amortization, lamp replacement, electricity and maintenance indicate expenditures of only a few tenths of a cent (U.S.) per square foot of treated area (24).

    This step is most likely to force a photodegradation of the phenolics to reduce the tannin bite and raw tang of a new wine.

    Then, it's probably going through a reverse osmosis matrix:

    Small molecules in wine may pass through an R.O. filter preferentially according to their smallness. Since H2O is the smallest molecule in wine, all of the other constituents are passed into the permeate in lower concentrations than are present in the wine. A typical permeate stream might contain water plus ethanol (75% of retentate concentration), acetic acid (60%), ethyl acetate (40%), and lactic acid (15%), and little else. Since the effective cut-off molecular weight for significant passage is 100 daltons and ions do not pass at all, R.O. permeate contains substantially no tartaric, citric or malic acids, anthocyanins or other phenolics.

    Depending on what the winemaker desires to accomplish, this permeate stream may be simply discarded, or may be treated to remove a particular constituent and then recombined with the retentate. The result may be a wine with the same volume and constituents except that a specific element has been reduced, enhancing the perception of desirable flavors. All R.O. applications seek to remove "surgically" a low-molecular-weight constituent of the wine with as little change in the rest of the wine's composition as possible.

    This would be to remove the products of the photodegradation and generally clean up the wine to smooth it out. The end result would be a decent, drinkable wine, much like the winemakers sell now in the $5-8/bottle range.

    Since wine is a luxury item in the US, a higher price = exclusivity = higher desirability, so this process isn't going to be used in the high end stuff. However, if it can shave a month off the aging process for the low end wines, that means the vineyards can get away with less space for storing inventory as it ages, so they might be interested.
    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  106. I've been doing this for years by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

    My process also works in seconds.

    About 310,360,000 seconds, in fact.

  107. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People like you must cry everytime that mass market gets their hands on goods of the quality that you've patted yourself on the back for paying so much for in the past. Us horrible poor people must make everything you love suck because there's no point in paying as much as you have for it.

    Then again, there'll always be a market for snobs with too much money to congratulate each other on be suckered for. We'll just regulate wine snobs to the same dust bin as audiophiles.

  108. Real? Imaginary? Complex? Quaternion? by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Unlike the magnets, this electrical system really does chemically change the wine.

    s/does/might/

    It's more promising than the magnets, but the bunkum FTA about "the taste of wine is enhanced by the mixture of alcohol with water molecule clusters" leaves me skeptical. I spent two years spent in the same house with an oenophile chemistry major turned professional wine maker. As I recall from his occasional diatribe on the topic, the nuances of wine flavor are primarily from esters and other complex organics; the sugar content and types determine the sweetness, but contribute little to the subtleties; and the water and ethanol are tasteless, merely controling how concentrated the other tastes are (and how quickly your judgement will go downhill).

    This fellow may have stumbled on something... but stumbled is the right word. It sounds like he doesn't know enough of the science behind wine... which may be why most of the professionals (who do) are uninterested. I'll wait for the double-blind results.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  109. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. No. My parent's house was a split level ranch. No basement to be found upstairs OR downstairs. I never did check out back. Besides your email is "(email not shown publicly)" so unless your first and last name happens to be "kuzb" your not much less anonymous.

    Anyways, I'm sitting in my very own basement now, listening to rap music.

  110. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you say the same thing to an advancement in computer technology?

    "Intel discovers way to make chips run twice as fast for the same price." "Why would they want to do that? Wouldn't that just devalue their expensive chips?"

    To think that "[p]eople who truly appreciate fine wines will not buy [this] stuff" is like my dad, who doesn't trust computers that don't have a front panel of switches and lights, because PCs are not Real Computers. Whatever. Technology marches on. If we piss off some wine snobs because we have better technology than they did in 1647, so be it. We won't be the worse for it.

  111. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's a last name, first initial. so, given that, where is your argument now?

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  112. Re:Sake is Not Wine=stupid logic by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

    In Japan sake is a generic term referring to all sorts of alcoholic beverages, including distilled ones. Only what the Japanese call nihonshu is called sake in the US. Some types of cheap nihonshu are extended by adding distilled pure grain alcohol. Also some fine brands add small amounts of distilled alcohol as an aromatic catylist. But fundamentally, the process which creates nihonshu, called sake in the US, is brewing.

    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
  113. Re:MOD PARENT UP, shenanigans on the 'wine zapper. by Net_Wakker · · Score: 1
    Also, when was the last time you've heard wine retailers sell you white wine - which have less tannins then most reds - that are designed to be stored long term? You can probably list some exceptions, but those are the very rare ones.
    Actually, most whites from the Burgundy-area And some Cote-du-Rhones are meant to age. Try a 1 year old Sancerre and compare it with a (correctly aged) 15 year old one.
    Same goes for most of the extra sweet white wines, often referred to as dessertwine. Some of those can age over a 100 years and still improve.
    So, in short, most whites are not to be stored but to say that the exceptions are few and between is very wrong.
    cheers.
  114. Nope by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    The idea that people who disagree with you are incapable of understanding something corrctly is as elitist as it gets.

    That you fail to recognize that speaks volumes about you.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    1. Re:Nope by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The idea that people who disagree with you are incapable of understanding something corrctly is as elitist as it gets.

      Disagree with me about what?

  115. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      People who truly appreciate fine wines will not buy stuff which breaks from traditional wine making.

    Good, then the rest of us will be able to enjoy good-tasting wines for less money.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  116. Re:Why? Who wants to devalue their product? by kuzb · · Score: 1

    aaw, comment didn't work out quite like you expected? It's ok, try again next time!

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.