Slashdot Mirror


Mandriva Fires Founder Gael Duval, Who Plans to Sue

Otter writes "Mandrake Linux founder Gael Duval has confirmed that Mandriva has let him go." A few hours later, Newsforge (owned by the same company that owns Slashdot) did an exclusive IRC interview with Gael in which he said he plans to sue his former employer for "abusive layoff." This is a sad day for Mandriva -- and for GNU/Linux in general. Gael was the founder and heart of the original Mandrake (now Mandriva) project, which was the first Linux distribution designed to be easy for non-technical users to install and administer. There is plenty of consternation in the Mandriva Club Forums about whether the company will go on supporting individual desktop users as strongly as it has in the past.

267 comments

  1. OSS immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well of course being open source. We're immune from situations like this.

    1. Re:OSS immunity by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well of course being open source. We're immune from situations like this.

      Well, if not immune, at least less vulnerable.

      After all, suppose you spend ten years creating your Magnum Opus, the thing that's going to change the world. Then the managers you originally hired to handle the boring business stuff turn around and fire you. If your work is proprietary, that's it. Find a new life's work.

      Within open source, you go to the spare bedroom, pop the source CD's, and open up a new sourceforge project. Your employment agreement might be a bit of a hurdle, but with any luck it's written with proprietary software in mind. "Uh, your honor, I'm not selling any products that compete with my former employer."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:OSS immunity by penrodyn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But it is a problem, let's say you've spent a couple of years using a partiular distribution, you know its quirks and the staff are used to it. Then bang, the business goes and the distribution is no longer supported, what happens to your service contract? No different from proprietory OSs.

    3. Re:OSS immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pay anybody you want for support? Hire a competent sysadmin for support? Migrate to another system at your own pace confident that all your data is stored in open, documented file formats?

      Not quite the exact same thing as dealing with the planned obsolescence, products designed to be single-vendor supported, and closed, sometimes encrypted data formats used in the proprietary software world.

      Maybe you should think before clicking 'submit' next time.

    4. Re:OSS immunity by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Interesting the way you have worded this. As it's exactly what Apple did to Steve Jobs. (Not say Gael is another Jobs.) Next move could be interesting.

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    5. Re:OSS immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean what Steve Jobs did to the Woz.

    6. Re:OSS immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your employment agreement might be a bit of a hurdle, but with any luck it's written with proprietary software in mind

      That sort of rubbish is not eforceable in the EU, it's called restraint of trade.

    7. Re:OSS immunity by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Apple did it to Jobs some time later (which is why he went and created NEXT)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    8. Re:OSS immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spare bedroom? Your wife manages your business too, huh?

    9. Re:OSS immunity by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      "You may be able to fire me, but you can't stop me from working for you!"

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    10. Re:OSS immunity by slapout · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next move could be interesting

      Yes. He could go back to work for them in a few years and create an open source hardware mp3 player! And a music store too! (ManTunes? DrivaTunes? DuvalTunes?)

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  2. This is truly a sad day by Winckle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro, and that it continues to remain as user-friendly and true to it's founding values, but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.

    1. Re:This is truly a sad day by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      "but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro"

      s/Ubuntu/Kubutu/g since Mandrake defaulted to KDE.

    2. Re:This is truly a sad day by vondo · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandr* for probably 5 years now. I've looked at other things, but never really given them a fair shake. I'm thinking of trying it again. Should I look at Ubuntu or Kanotix? One thing I really like about Mandr* is the PLF packages that add MP3 playing/encoding, DVD playing, proprietary codecs for VLC etc. Is there something similar for one of these friendly Debian based distros?

    3. Re:This is truly a sad day by madaxe42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about Gentoo? Wonderful community. And you end up with plenty of time to get to know them all, while you wait for it to build!

    4. Re:This is truly a sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For ubuntu you just have to install the codes, for that any one of the guides out there can do it. No clue about Kanotix.

    5. Re:This is truly a sad day by ryants · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro, and that it continues to remain as user-friendly and true to it's founding values, but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.
      I've been a Mandriva Club silver-level member for 2.5 years now, and I'm going to let my membership lapse in a few weeks. I downloaded the Ubuntu appliance from VMWare a while ago, and it is far superior to Mandriva for ease-of-use, ease-of-administration. I'm just waiting for the next version of Ubuntu in April to dump Mandriva from my desktop.

      When I moved from Slackware to Mandrake, it was great, but Mandrake/Mandriva have not really kept up, IMHO.

      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    6. Re:This is truly a sad day by ryants · · Score: 5, Informative
      Should I look at Ubuntu or Kanotix? One thing I really like about Mandr* is the PLF packages
      I'm a soon-to-be former Mandriva Silver Club member, and I'm looking at Ubuntu.

      I believe the Ubuntu equivalent to PLF is the Multiverse.

      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    7. Re:This is truly a sad day by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've tried out Mandrake/Mandriva a number of times in the past. (I even did a review on version 10 here.) While they gained a lot of good will for being "user friendly", I always found them to be not worth the effort. The desktop feels nice and all, but the system always had some sort of problems that could never quite be resolved. It's hard to say why Mandrake always was so difficult to work with, but if I were to take a guess, I'd point a finger at their bleeding edge software. They are infamous for always packing in the latest and greatest. That same bleeding edge mentality is what got them in trouble with version 9.2.

      Bye bye, CD Drive.

    8. Re:This is truly a sad day by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like both Ubuntu (in Xubuntu form) and Kanotix, so I suggest you burn the live CDs of each and check them out.
      Kanos Script Page has some useful install scripts for handling what you want, and the people on the forums are helpful.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    9. Re:This is truly a sad day by Vrejakti · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't the first time that a founder of a Linux distribution has left the project or taken a lessor role, but it certainly is surprising how the founder of the distribution was forced to leave.

      Back in 2003 when I bought my cutting edge PC hardware, I was having little luck getting into the Linux world. I was a noob, with poorly supported hardware in Linux. Specifically a ICHR5 S-ATA controller on my ASUS motherboard. Slackware failed to boot, Fedora Core failed to boot, as did Debian. One distro did work however, and that was Mandrake. To this day Mandrake has had the best support for my hardware, with a consistently easy set up process. However, it was never the right distro for me.

      When I finally got Fedora Core working I noticed many improvements over Mandrake. It just had a feel like it was more polished, more professional. Shortly after getting used to Fedora, I dropped it for Gentoo, and I've never looked back. ^_^

      Any who, I hope Gael Duval gets things settled with Mandrake. It was his company, surely they should let him go on far better terms!

      PS. This post doesn't have a point, but please feel free to mod me Underrated or Interesting. :-D

    10. Re:This is truly a sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used Mandrake from 7.2 up to 10.1. When the switch to Mandriva happened, I was having problems installing on my laptop. I started looking at other distributions, and found Kubuntu to be almost as painless to set up as Mandrake. Ocasionally I miss some of Mandrake's admin tooks, but Kubuntu is pretty complete and the user forums are as good as Mandrakes. No going back for me.

    11. Re:This is truly a sad day by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      Mandrake was the first distro I ever managed to get working. Now I'm using Ubuntu on my desktop. As I see it, Ubuntu and Debian have the advantage of making it really easy and convenient to install software. Yeah, I know, because this is a Mandrive story, a gazillion Mandriva users will flame me, and say that RPM is just a file format, apt-get isn't really easier, etc. Well, all I can say is that apt-get seems easier to me.

      The disadvantages of Ubuntu, as I see them, are:

      1. It's a bleeding-edge distro. Every release ships with some broken stuff. For instance, one of the most important apps I need to use every day is a Perl/Tk app, and it turns out that Perl/Tk is broken in breezy badger (Perl/Tk apps crash when run alongside GTK2 apps).
      2. For people (not me) who really care a lot about doing audio and video, I can see how it might be convenient to have a commercial distro, where some of the proprietary codecs, etc., would be easier to install.
      3. For people (not me) who want commecial support, a commercial distro might be better.
    12. Re:This is truly a sad day by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I tried to run mandrake. I put it on my brother's laptop etc, and it worked well for a few years. But, damnit, it's rpm and not .deb - what's with that? I too have switched to ubuntu, and the number one reason is because it uses .deb

    13. Re:This is truly a sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw. Po po widdle winux. Haha, looks like the animosity is open sourced too.

    14. Re:This is truly a sad day by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I converted to Ubuntu a few weeks ago after a few failed attempts to move over to Linux. There was always *something* that kept me from keeping it. Poor sound support and other basic hardware problems were experienced with everything from Slackware to Fedora to Mandrake. So I gave up for a while.

      I'd been hearing a lot of good things about Ubuntu and decided to give it a shot.

      I'm impressed.

      For the first time, I've installed a Linux distro where *everything* worked out of the box. There are some minor annoyances that I've encountered but the Ubuntu community is among the most helpful I've seen. There are countless Ubuntu-specific HOWTOs in Ubuntu forums. I'm thrilled to finally have this.

      Kudos to the (k/edu/x)Ubuntu team for a really great product.

    15. Re:This is truly a sad day by codemachine · · Score: 2, Informative
    16. Re:This is truly a sad day by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.

      I disagree. I disagree because because my experience of Mandrake is that the user experience has been far worse than its rivals and if you asked me what the No.1 User Friendly distro was a few years back, it certainly wouldn't be Mandrake. Red Hat perhaps, SUSE probably not, but no way Mandrake. The "Drak" tools were consistently buggy, marred by horrible usability issues, not very task oriented and were slapped onto the side of the desktop with the finesse of tractor welded to a car. User friendly implies usability and I recall Mandrake tools couldn't even get simple things right like the order of buttons on message boxes. I used it from about 6.3 to 8.0 and my experience was that each progressive release got buggier and buggier and I finally gave up on it. I revisited it for 9.1 and 9.2 and it was just as bad - worse even since the fundamental issues with the usability never seem to be fixed.

      The only thing in my book which set Mandrake apart from Red Hat, SUSE or whoever was a larger number of packages on the CD and bleeding edge version numbers. I wouldn't hold SUSE's config up as an example of usable either, but it was at at least reliable and consistent. It's even almost pleasant to use in SUSE 10, assuming you run a KDE desktop.

      I do like Ubuntu though. I think the shitty brown theme is horrid, but the integration and use of GNOME tools makes for a seamless and very pleasant desktop experience. That's what Linux should be like and its about time that it is. Now distros are paying attention to usability, Linux may finally start to appear on a few more desktops.

    17. Re:This is truly a sad day by Wylfing · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro, and that it continues to remain as user-friendly and true to it's founding values, but I'm beginning to think Ubuntu has replaced Mandrake/riva as the No 1 user-friendly distro.

      I've been a Mandriva Club silver-level member for 2.5 years now, and I'm going to let my membership lapse in a few weeks. I downloaded the Ubuntu appliance from VMWare a while ago, and it is far superior to Mandriva for ease-of-use, ease-of-administration. I'm just waiting for the next version of Ubuntu in April to dump Mandriva from my desktop.

      I will echo that. I paid for my Mandrake Club and support contracts in my day. At the time (a few years ago) it was really the best out there for usability. There was always something they didn't get right, but less so than anyone else. But these days I run Ubuntu on the desktop and straight-dope Debian on the server. I was blown away by how well Ubuntu worked out of the box. Networking, including wireless, graphics, sound, everything just worked. (In all fairness, I did have to tweak xorg.conf one time to get the uberhigh screen resolutions I wanted, but that's it.)

      Now, all that said, I did highly value Mandrake in its day. Obviously, since I paid for it for 2 years. They vanguarded things like doing a gamer edition, which is something someone should revisit, seeing how good Cedega is at Windows games these days (I've been playing Morrowind under Cedega without incident for a few weeks now). I'm sad to see them take a blow of any kind, in the same way I am sad to see Dreamcast go under and Infocom disappear.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    18. Re:This is truly a sad day by rwgeorge · · Score: 1

      I used Mandrake for years and I can sincerely say, Mandrake blows monkey balls, and I hope it completely falls off the face of the earth. There has never been a distro where you could say "wow, they totally got it right!"...For over two years now, I've been a Gentoo user (and a happy one at that) - but I decided to install Ubuntu on one of my spare workstations at work...and wow! they totally got it right! I NEVER had that experience with Mandrake.

    19. Re:This is truly a sad day by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Ive played around a lot with Ubuntu, and some with Fedora Core, but I keep coming back to drake. I guess I'm just used to where everything is, plus I havent found a package manager in any distro that I like (other than urpmi).

      --
      :x
    20. Re:This is truly a sad day by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      who cares what the extension of the package is? I run Mandrake on one box, ubuntu on the other. The only difference I can tell is what type of package one must download.

      --
      :x
    21. Re:This is truly a sad day by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      iirc lg did release details of an emergency flash mode after that incident (iirc it involved fitting the master/slave select jumper sideways) so the drives could be recovered.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:This is truly a sad day by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Getting MP3 playback etc is fairly trivial on just about every linux distribution. The patent, license, and other issues are what stop much of the GNU/Linux family from being a Whateverthehellusersactuallywant/Linux family ;)

      I stopped using Mandrake when they married Connectiva and changed their name. I even bought Mandrake Linux 9.0, back in the day, but that merger/acquisition was the last stray. I've migrated to Gentoo and SUSE, almost exclusively (occasionally I flirt with CentOS and Ubuntu as well).

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    23. Re:This is truly a sad day by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't think linux and user friendly belong in the same sentence. Troll mod me if you must, but the last time I tried to install Mandriva the sound was broken, the last time i tried to install Ubuntu the installer crashed due to lack of PCI express support, and the last time I tried to install Gentoo i get all sorts of wierd udev shit on boot about /dev/hdc3 not being a valid device. Maybe I'm retarded, but is it even possible to screw things up with genkernel+coldplug+ReadingTheFuckingManual while installing? I think i'll wait untill devfs becomes (more?) depricated before i try installing Gentoo again.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    24. Re:This is truly a sad day by baldass_newbie · · Score: 0

      apt-get a clue

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    25. Re:This is truly a sad day by g2devi · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I believe the Ubuntu equivalent to PLF is the Multiverse.

      Actually, the Ubuntu equivalent to PLF is the PLF:-)
      http://wiki.ubuntu-fr.org/doc/plf

    26. Re:This is truly a sad day by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      bah dum ching.

      Do you have a point or just an ass?

      --
      :x
    27. Re:This is truly a sad day by penix1 · · Score: 1

      That's strange....I can have a Gentoo GRP up in under 40 mins. You must be doing something wrong...

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    28. Re:This is truly a sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time I tried to install Ubuntu, about 7 months ago, it had nothing right. The installer was a horried experience, it didn't pick up half of my hardware, including bluetooth and one of my cd drives. Whereas, Suse picked up everything and worked like a charm from the get-go. I also used Mandriva for a long time, it was ok for some purposes but I have to agree there were always issues and it never felt fully integrated and user-friendly. Red Hat/Fedora was ok for a while, but after the 9.0 release Fedora disappointed me. But that's the beauty of Linux and open source, to each their own :)

    29. Re:This is truly a sad day by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu is probably about where Mandrake was in 2001, they still want to help the home user and there's no pressure to buy a powerpack or membership. Ubuntu even post DVD's out for free, what more could people want?

      The other good thing about Ubuntu is the Debian roots, so when someone outgrows their pre-packed distro they have the real Debian to play with.

      --
      Common sense is not so common
    30. Re:This is truly a sad day by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Having switched from Mandrake to Ubuntu my experience is:

      Mandrake is less likely to have problems on OS installation and is easier to configure though the GUI.

      Ubuntu is easier to upgrade - you can even upgrade to a new version of the OS through a GUI installer. This also means all security patches get installed promptly. Installing new applications is easier as well.

      Ubuntu's biggest weakness is lack of multimedia (lots of formats you can not play) in the default install - there is a script (Automatix?) avaiable that installs everything in one go though so it is a one-off problem.

    31. Re:This is truly a sad day by vboulytchev · · Score: 0

      if you had to chose the OS for your datacenter anything ut rh or centos what would you chose?

    32. Re:This is truly a sad day by marafa · · Score: 1

      i began using mandrake 7.1 when it first came out and updated accordingly. at 10.1 i became a club member at the 5USD/month to show them how much i appreciated them in my small way.
      i didnt renew the next year coz they decided to raise the price. so i used the 2005 mandriva community edition. then here at work, my years of talking about linux produced some results. there are now 3 linux servers.
      however, i had to use redhat for the software certification and someone to lay the blame on if something failed. so personally, i too, have moved to fedora, its not as great as mandriva but the number of packages for it are amazing!

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    33. Re:This is truly a sad day by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Yeah right up until you need to upgrade, or want a package from the vastly larger debian achieve.

    34. Re:This is truly a sad day by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Infocom LIVES!!!! I picked up the entire collection but will probably never get all the goodies that came with it. And I want a zorkmid coin!!!

      *sigh*

      I think it was destined to fade away.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    35. Re:This is truly a sad day by madaxe42 · · Score: 1
    36. Re:This is truly a sad day by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1
      upgrade everything, or just a package?

      everything: urpmi --auto-select
      one package: urpmi package

      I also did a quick google for number of packages, but I cant find hard numbers. Either way, it is VERY rare for me to find something I want that isnt in 'drivas pacakge database.

      Have you actually *USED* it recently, or are you like everyone else who complains about what they don't use?

      --
      :x
    37. Re:This is truly a sad day by Reziac · · Score: 1

      As I recall the final and definitive analysis of the "Bye-bye CD drive" problem, the REAL cause was a Stupid Assumption in LG's firmware code, which MDK 9.2 just happened to trip over. (Sorry, I don't remember any more details than that.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    38. Re:This is truly a sad day by kbahey · · Score: 1

      I have been on Mandrake/Mandriva since the 8.x days (maybe 4-5 years). Had it on 4 out of the 5 machines at home.

      The last release of Mandriva that I used (LE 2005) was really slow to boot, and my kids complained.

      I am now half moved to kubuntu, with only the server left to migrate.

      I find kubuntu is nice to use and more lightweight than the latest incarnations of Mandriva.

    39. Re:This is truly a sad day by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      The last release of Mandriva that I used (LE 2005) was really slow to boot, and my kids complained.

      If boot speed is the problem, you should really try Mandriva 2006 first before completely migrating. Booting time is one of the special strong points of this release.

    40. Re:This is truly a sad day by TheKeyboardSlayer · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu is about as new user friendly as a 747. Try PCLinuxOS instead...and PCLinuxOS was forked from Mandrake 9.2 back in the day...it's what Mandrake should have become.

      --
      Insert_Ending_Here
    41. Re:This is truly a sad day by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Quirky of me to be sure, but there's no way in hell I'm going to run a Linux distro with a lame ass name like "PCLinuxOS". That's really teh ghey.

  3. His own fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you start the company, you dictate the policies. If he gave up his power to someone else (and for profit, likely), he should have expected this possibility. Still a dick thing to do, though.

  4. Many have bailed on them already though. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    at the local LUG many users bailed on t hem after the mess that was Mandriva 2006. It is buggy and has problems compared to the Mandrake version just before it. That started a flocking to Ubuntu and Gentoo at the LUG (A 100 pack of Ubuntu Cd's coming in that month did not help matters either.

    They really dropped the QC on the distro they released right after the Mandriva change and that really hurt them.

    Now the management is making changes inside as well.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by Joe+Enduser · · Score: 1

      Quality control was never the strongest point of this otherwise very fine and amazingly user friendly distro. Too bad they kept Openoffice.org 2 out of their latest free release, saving it for the club members. That made me switch my customers and myself to Kubuntu.

    2. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by johnlenin1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To add another anecdote: I've used Mandr[ake|iva] since v. 7, and was just about to bail on them after the "2005 LE" version. I even let my club membership lapse. I put Kubuntu "Hoary Hedgehog" on my work desktops and found it to be superior in many respects, and "Breezy" even more so.

      However, I recently tried Mandriva 2006 Free on my MythTV box at home, and it was a breeze in every respect. I was up and running hours quicker than with Kubuntu on the same machine. Mandriva also seemed more polished and stable for me, the first Mandriva distro in years that didn't regularly crash inexplicably on this computer.

      Still, too bad about Gael, though.

    3. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QC isn't exactly Ubuntu's strong point either:
      http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/13/0525254.shtml

    4. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      And on the other hand, I have a minimal install of Ubuntu that's the only distro I found that will detect and use my HD3000 card right out of the box, and works wonderfully with MythTV 0.19. Anecdotes prove nothing.

    5. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am another Madrake-bailer circa the release of 2005LE. At the time, Mandrake 9.1 was the most stable and user-friendly ever produced in Linux history AFAIC. The decision to buy Connectiva didn't give them much benefit and the new name was (and is) beyond terrible. I moved to Fedora when my Silver-level club membership expired and haven't looked back.

      The company had great momentum building at the time they emerged from bankruptcy protection and different decisions might have made things very different today.

    6. Re:Many have bailed on them already though. by ReinoutS · · Score: 2, Informative
      Too bad they kept Openoffice.org 2 out of their latest free release, saving it for the club members.

      The key word here is support. Mandriva 2006 had a release schedule. Had they included OO.o2, they would have had to support a hardly tested pre-release version of it for years to come. They've been bitten before by including RC-quality software (KDE 2.99 iirc) and I think it's very understandable they don't want such a disaster to happen again.

      Yes, OO.o2 is now available on the Club, but it is still unsupported.

  5. Reminds me of Caldera by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Caldera had a semi-decent mostly commerical OS out there, and then when they were bought up they slowly but certainly dropped any pretense of being interested in the home/enthusiast market. Of course, Mandrake had much more of a tie with the community; but it seems their tie to the community just walked out the door, didn't it?

    Let's hope Mandriva doesn't suddenly decide that its' IP is in the linus kernel!

    1. Re:Reminds me of Caldera by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Meh, we'll just use the andrea kernel.

    2. Re:Reminds me of Caldera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caldera had a semi-decent mostly commerical OS out there, and then when they were bought up

      Caldera was never bought up by anyone. They lived in dreams of being bought up by IBM but dreams were all they had. Now they just have nightmares of course :)

  6. He should fork it... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Call it TruMandriva or somesuch, and all his adherents will follow him.

    Let the legal goodness commence!

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:He should fork it... by weierstrass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He should call it Mandrake.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    2. Re:He should fork it... by jejones · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why bother when there's already PCLinuxOS? texstar does very good work...

    3. Re:He should fork it... by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      I suspect he wouldn't be allowed to call it anything like Mandrake or Mandriva due to trademark issues.

    4. Re:He should fork it... by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      If it's a non-commercial OS I'm not so sure. IIRC the legal case against the name Mandrake wasn't tremendously strong in the first place.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    5. Re:He should fork it... by bebing · · Score: 1

      How about Mandrivenout!

    6. Re:He should fork it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no legal case against Mandrake. They changed their name cause they bought Connective (and it somehow became Mandriva... of all the possible names they picked the worst).

    7. Re:He should fork it... by smchris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not Gaelinux? Hell, Debian flew.

    8. Re:He should fork it... by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that worked for Tru64. Oh wait...

  7. It is unfortunate... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... that everyone needs to concentrate on litigation and legal battles instead of making a difference by doing something constructive. Before seeing this story, I was just thinking about an article where someone said businesses in the U.S. need to stop whining about everything foreign business competition and they need to start competing with those foreign businesses instead. The trouble is that the government, meaning federal, state, county, city, and otherwise, is and has been abusing businesses for a long time with all kinds of taxes, fees, and administrative overhead that does nothing for anybody. So of course American products must cost more to cover the costs.

    1. Re:It is unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. American businesses are abused by the government. Thats a funny one. *GASP* you mean an artifical construct with legal rights has to pay TAXES?! unbelievable!

    2. Re:It is unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell does that have to do with this article or thread?

    3. Re:It is unfortunate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad Troll! No biscuit!

  8. Maybe not bad by Life700MB · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Mandrake was my distro of choice before seeing the Light and converting to Debian, and I remember that it was a great distribution... but somewhere they lost the path and starting falling to the ground: the LG drives fiasco, the name change, the bloat, the battle with Ubuntu for the easy-to-use-linux crown...

    Maybe Gael has now the oportunity to create from zero a great new distribution without the inherents problems of Mandrake/Mandriva!

    I sincerely hope so.


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Maybe not bad by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Debians model looks better and better as distros based on a less-idealistic scheme run into trouble. If one wants a better-for-their-purpose Debian, they make a Kanotix, Ubuntu, Mepis, or whatever. Meanwhile the Debian folks concentrate on their competencies and keep Debian going.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Maybe not bad by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Maybe Gael has now the oportunity to create from zero a great new distribution without the inherents problems of Mandrake/Mandriva!

      Maybe Canonical (Ubuntu) can hire him.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    3. Re:Maybe not bad by ashSlash · · Score: 1

      You read my mind!

    4. Re:Maybe not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we don't need another distro, too many that work half ass as is.
      He should just pick himself up, suck it up and move on.
      Sueing would do either side no good.

  9. Potentially good by cheinz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say that this may not be such a bad thing. Mr. Duval may now start another project, and build something good again. Mandrake(driva) had really started to fall off a few releases ago in my opinion. Many people I know are using Fedora now that used Mandrake in the past. I certainly feel bad that Mr. Duval is now unemployed, but perhaps we can build something positive out of this. Mandrake used to be the distro I told people to start with, lately it's been Ubuntu. Perhaps this can be a day remembered as the day a new distro was born, and it was also today that Mandriva lost a great asset. Just trying to remain positive.

    1. Re:Potentially good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... Didn't a similar thing happen to Steve Jobs? And where does he stand now? Let's hope Gael keeps a positive attitude about the situation and pursues other avenues that might benefit us all yet again.

    2. Re:Potentially good by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      What happened is simple: Everyone else is now as "easy to use" as Mandrake claimed to be back in the day.

      I remember my first linux kick - I had played around with it in 1999 (RedHat 6.x, I believe), but hadn't really made the switch. So, I bought a copy of Mandrake 7.2 at Best Buy, along with a hardware serial port modem, and installed it. I only had one computer at the time, and I completely removed my windows partition. I told myself that the only way I would learn was by doing, and forcing myself to learn.

      Well, it helped that Mandrake 7.2 was so radically easy - I mean, it had a graphical installer (woah). It detected some of my hardware (wow, working graphics at 1024x768). It knew what my modem was (well, it understood "serial port that way" and "Hayes standard").

      Now, though, excepting the most modern hardware, any linux distro will boot and install and give you that much usability.

      What really screwed mandrakeiva was their seeming focus on making people buy the support. They offer it for free, but you kind of have to dig around on their site to find it (unlike, say, fedora, archlinux, centos, ubuntu, debian, gentoo, etc etc). They're really pushing their pay products. And I'm not saying they shouldn't be able to make money. What I am saying is that people often are resentful of companies which try to trick them into paying; making them believe that payment is the only option.

      So, in short, they've alienated their customers through trickery, and they're now no easier than any other distro. Their market niche has dried up. Time to move out. ... and this from someone who runs a Mandriva Mirror.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:Potentially good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. Re:What really happened by butterwise · · Score: 0

    We have your IP and you are soooo gone!

    --
    If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
  11. Penguin Suit by dotslashdot · · Score: 1, Funny

    It was only a matter of time before someone brought a Penguin suit.

  12. You gotta be kidding me. by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is happening to the right to fire? We're not even talking non-union workers here. A company, public and private too, ought to be able to fire in accordance with that sole law of maximizing shareholder wealth for public companies -- If the given employee is not helping an organization pursue that goal, that should be cause enough.

    1. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how we live in a society where the greedy desires of a few are more important than the quality of life of the whole.

      Society is progressing.

    2. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not taking the bait.

    3. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by XanC · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. Anything else is an inefficiency, and bad for everyone.

    4. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Varitek · · Score: 2, Informative

      At-will employment maybe the norm in the USA, but that isn't the case everywhere.

    5. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which makes the USA the best place in the world to start a small business as well as wealth creation.

      Small business and startups have an insane near %90 failure rate 2 years after they open. Bad employees will make it much higher. If your retirement savings and home were used as equilateral for the loan for your business then you lose that too and perhaps your marriage if it fails due to a couple of bad apples that you need to fire.

      Capitalism is the most efficient system around and this is coming from someone who is considered a liberal and left wing nut by those in US.

    6. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by stinerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many places in Europe, IIRC, you can't just fire anyone for any reason.

      While there may be a legal right to terminate employees, one I certainly don't agree with, for any reason in the USA, it is ultimately counterproductive due to decreased worker morale. I know I'd think twice about working for a company who fires their employees on whims. I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day.

    7. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Empirically, indulging the greedy desires of the few appears to be the best guarantee of quality of life for the rest.

      Or do you have any better systems to propose? (Difficulty: if you have to stick a gun in peoples' backs to get them to adopt your system, your system sucks.)

    8. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're completely right with that, it's still a very unusual decision to fire the person that's probably best known in the community and in the press when talking about Mandriva Linux.
      You need a very good reason for that decision to make sense from a business point of view ... and so far I'm not seeing that reason.
      That's why many people are curious/worried about the future direction of the company.

    9. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I usually don't bother people much over typos and whatnot, but this one kinda caught my eye:

      If your retirement savings and home were used as equilateral

      Presumably collateral?

      I'd work up something funny based off of what you said, but it just doesn't jive in any way I can think of.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Jason+Hood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To me, that is a scary thought.

      If I own a business, I have the right as theowner to discontinue paying them for their services at anytime for any reason unless I have signed a contract with them stipulating otherwise. To think that I cannot fire an employee for poor performance or bad decision making sounds absolutely insane.

      Mandriva has every right to terminate his employment for _nearly_ any reason.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    11. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is "equilateral" another term for collateral?

    12. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I know I'd think twice about working for a company who fires their employees on whims. I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day.


      And thus the system self regulates. Due to the deep complexity of the US economy, this model works. Employees can quit and move on to another company. In smaller markets, this may not work since there may not be acceptable substitutes but in the US economy, it works very well.

      Just look at EDS, its a shadow of what it once was because of firing on a whim management policy (Dick Brown you suck). Morale dropped, good employees left, then many of their customers left. Microsoft, may suffer the same fate. Their current policies and environment are very similar to EDS 4 years ago. As long as the economy has the ability to normalize itself, At-Will employment works and works well.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    13. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by OppressiveGiant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. The company is more than one person there are probably hundreds of people working there. As management it is your job to make sure that the people there continue to get paid. If one person is making it impossible(or harder) to do that then you're doing a disservice to those hundreds of other people by not letting that person go. If your options are Paying 501 people for a couple more months or paying 500 indefinately the decision is simple. That's more than likely a gross exageration of the situation, but we don't know the details at all. It's silly for us to be arguing without knowing anything and if he really feels he was wronged, it will be settled in court.

      --
      i could not think of anything clever.
    14. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>If your retirement savings and home were used as equilateral

      >Presumably collateral?

      >I'd work up something funny based off of what you said, but it just doesn't jive in any way I can think of.

      You're just not coming up with the right _angle_. _Try_ harder, you'll get there by degrees. Or just make an acute observation.

    15. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditionalism?

      Oh, you were only thinking of societies that are obsessed with wealth and materlism as a "goal".

    16. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it is ultimately counterproductive due to decreased worker morale. I know I'd think twice about working for a company who fires their employees on whims. I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day.

      Fortunately I work in Europe so I am safe. That's why my morale is high, my employer can not fire me for reading slashdot and my productivity ... err, nevermind. Two more hours to the end of my working day, going to read new slashdot topic.

    17. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you were only thinking of societies that are obsessed with wealth and materlism as a "goal".

      Like I said, if your system requires a wholesale rewiring of human nature, then... well, ya know, we all wanna change the world.

    18. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, no, not actually...you also have to abide by the Laws of the United States, and the State in which you do business. Firing someone for "poor performance or bad decision making" isn't so much a problem, though, as firing people because they are brown or black, or firing people who don't go to the "right" church.

      I believe it is true (or so they taught in International Business) that in Europe it is much more difficult to fire someone, including applying for permission with the government prior to firing the person.

    19. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Otter · · Score: 1
      You're just not coming up with the right _angle_. _Try_ harder, you'll get there by degrees. Or just make an acute observation.

      Yeah, how obtuse can he be?

    20. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is happening to the right to fire?

      There's no such right. Before you criticise, consider this: do you have the right to fire a worker for not sucking you off in your country? No? Then your "right to fire" has limitations too. Whether you can legally fire somebody depends on the circumstances.

      The real question is why he was fired. If, as you wildly speculate, he was fired because it's more profitable for the company that way, then sure, they should be able to fire him. But you only have their word for that. It does seem to be a bit odd that they have been hiring in 2006, are firing the very person that created their core product, and yet deny having any problems with him.

    21. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day.

      Exactly. That's what stops employers in the US from firing on a whim. I believe in the inherent right of employers to hire and fire whomever they please, for whatever reason, but that doesn't mean that right should be exercised without due care, if you want to run a successful business.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    22. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I own a business, I have the right as the owner..

      In France? As the owner you only have a right to f**t in someones general direction.

      You know... Have two cows...

    23. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Many places in Europe, IIRC, you can't just fire anyone for any reason

      Correct. And this being France, there are some very strict laws about when someone can be fired. The net result of this is that lawsuit about being fired are common, companies are afraid to hire people, and companies can't weather downturns or adapt by firing people. Gee, and the French wonder why their economy isn't as strong as they want it to be.

      Before anyone says anything - I actually grew up there and still have family there. Which is one of the reasons why I'm so pissed off about this situation. They're shooting themselves in the foot and don't want to realize it.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    24. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Urusai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, corporations are permitted to exist because they are perceived to increase the public good. When they don't, then they have violated their mandate. I've got news for some people, capitalism is not an ethos. It so happens that it seems to be of greater public benefit than competing systems. When you start justifying your means to the detriment of your ends, you've lost your ethical compass, and it's time to recalibrate.

    25. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 3, Informative
      including applying for permission with the government prior to firing the person.

      The UK govt. doesn't get involved (and I doubt any other European govts do either) with people being fired on an everyday basis - I mean, how would they ever get any work done?*

      In the UK, there are such things as industrial tribunals, where you can go and argue that you were unfairly dismissed - i.e. there was no good reason to dismiss you (to the poster who worried that they wouldn't be able to fire someone for poor performance or bad decision making - of course these are grounds for dismissal in the UK - but some guy putting sugar in the boss's coffee by mistake when the boss is having a bad day is not).

      What you might have been told about is that when a company makes people redundant (downsizing), if they let go more than a certain number of people, they have to warn the govt. in advance. If you let go of more than 25-30 people, you have to give a month's warning, and there's another threshold for 3 month's warning. I'm guessing similar arrangements may exist elsewhere in Europe.

      * Leave it.

    26. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > What is happening to the right to fire?

      They are a French company. The rules are different. And it's not like executives don't file wrongful termination suits in the USA.

      Anyway, he seemed to give up control pretty readily when he sold the company in the first place. If you're not on the board, you're just another employee, founder or no.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    27. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by beru777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Mandriva has every right to terminate his employment for _nearly_ any reason."

      Not in France, certainly not. You'll end up in court and having to prove that the person was doing something really wrong.

    28. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      sole law of maximizing shareholder wealth for public companies

      Just a note - in the United States of America, corporations (public and private) owe their first duty to their shareholders. In parts of Europe, however, they owe their first duty to someone else - typically to the society as a whole.

    29. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Jason+Hood · · Score: 1

      Well no offense to the French, but that is a prime reason why I would never start a business there.

      However I might work for someone else ;) Think Office Space...

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    30. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by stuktongue · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this post. It is unfortunate, I think, that so many folks today are so driven by bottom-line concerns that they lose sight of (or at least strongly deprioritize) many of the non-financial goals with which most businesses are started. Further--and I think this is more or less the point of the original post--it is a sad thing anytime someone who creates something from nothing is later told to leave by folks who come later. Perhaps this man had it coming based on performance issues--the company has not been performing well financially for some time--but it is a sad thing nonetheless. I think anyone who doesn't immediately see that ought to consider what it would be like if it were to happen to them!

      Take it easy.

    31. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by goldspider · · Score: 1

      "I know I'd think twice about working for a company who fires their employees on whims. I'd also do poor work if I had to continuously worry that today might be my last day."

      Well, you could do that, and look forward to many "last days".

      Or you could quit whining about "the system" and do good work. That way you wouldn't have to be looking over your shoulder every day.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    32. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Suppressing human nature? It's called "government". That's why people aren't beating you with rocks and sticks to take your food, clothes and money.

    33. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU, Donny. You're out of your element.

    34. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by jlarocco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Legally and economically, I agree with you completely.

      But unless the person is doing something illegal or blatantly against the rules, I don't think it's in their best interest to fire such a high profile employee. The drop in overall employee morale will probably cost them a lot more than keeping the guy on, and the public perception that they need to fire the founder to stay afloat will probably hurt them even more.

    35. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may be the owner of the business and the one paying the salary, but you are also asking your employee to make an investment in you and your time. For the same reason as you'd generally require them to give notice and so forth - and most contracts only allow the employer the right to pay in lieu of notice, and not for the employee to leave "at will". Not saying you shouldn't be allowed to employ who you like, as you like, but if you require a commitment from your employees, they should be able to require a commitment from you. It ain't (or shouldn't be) a one way street just because its your signature on the cheques.

    36. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have the right to fire a worker for not sucking you off in your country?

      Of course I do. How do you think porn is made?

      If I hire you to suck my dick but when you arrive I insist you clean toilets you have a pretty good shot at winning a lawsuit.

      If I hire you to clean toilets but when you arrive I insist you suck my dick you have a pretty good shot at winning a lawsuit.

      The dick sucking really has nothing to do with it.

    37. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by guet · · Score: 1

      Due to the deep complexity of the US economy, this model works.

      For certain values of 'works'

      Just look at EDS, its a shadow of what it once was because of firing on a whim management policy

      So are you against 'at will' employment or not?

      There are many other factors which constrain (and rightly so) the individual liberty of the employer to treat their employees as they see fit. Even in the US, the economy is nowhere near a 'free' market. A question which people don't often address is whether a free market, left to its own devices, tends towards a freer market, or tends to the concentration of capital and the build up of monopolies and ever-larger conglomerates. You imply in this post that if there was no government regulation, the market would be a self-regulating haven of free agents.

      In fact there is no such thing as a free agent. (If I may parody Thatcher for a moment.)

      Finally the UK and other countries in Europe have a different balance of rights, with the workers' rights more strictly enforced, it's not a different system, just a different emphasis. An employer can fire their employees, but only when it is justified by the employee's actions or the economic situation, not on a whim.

    38. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      you can do the same in europe.
      in germany for example there are three kinds of terminating an employment:
      personenbedingte kuendigung is firing for poor performance.
      verhaltensbedingte kuendigung is firing for making mistakes.
      betriebsbedingte kuendigung is firing for all the other reasons except of "just for fun".

      in the last case you just cannot fire at will (sorry for the bad pun) but to chose someone who would have most chances to find a new job fast, that's it.
      so those fairy tales about how difficult it is to terminate an employment in europe are just that, fairy tales.

      it is just that companies don't like to do the third case very much because this shows these companies in a bad light and they tend to have difficulties to find new employees after that.
      guess noone wants to work for a company which management is too stupid to calculate how many employees company really needs.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    39. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      including applying for permission with the government prior to firing the person.

      in France such permission is required if you plan to let go more than 20 people at once.
      Goverment veifies if you fire them to overcome serious business difficulties, or just to improve your result. But usually they give thumbs up.
      Firing individuals is not submitted to such an authorization. That's why you can sue afterwards if you don't agree with the motives.

    40. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      As a business owner I'd rather start a business somewhere in Burma. I could pay my workers 2 dollars a day, work them for 20 hours and when they get sick throw them out on the street and if they complain have the government run thugs shoot them and their family (as a warning to others). Then I'd sell the product to first-world nations and laugh my way to the bank at the pathetic French business owners deling with such nonsense as 'workwes rihts', unions and pensions. The workers, they are not human beings working tohether with me to create value, they are just raw materials I buy, same as steel ir oil, and to be discarded the moment I dont need them or can get a cheaper supply elsewhere.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    41. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      in the last case you just cannot fire at will (sorry for the bad pun) but to chose someone who would have most chances to find a new job fast, that's it.

      Wouldn't that mean, firing your most capable people? That's incredibly funny...

    42. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      not the most capable, but rather the youngest.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    43. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      in France such permission is required if you plan to let go more than 20 people at once.

      So if you feel like firing 200 people, you just need to "spread it out" over 11 months (of 19 people each), and you won't need such permission. But you better not screw up your calculation, hehe...

    44. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      of course these are grounds for dismissal in the UK - but some guy putting sugar in the boss's coffee by mistake when the boss is having a bad day is not).

      ... but what about putting salt in it ;-) ? Much more funny...

    45. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      "but some guy putting sugar in the boss's coffee by mistake when the boss is having a bad day is not"

      Unless your role is to make coffee and you regularly make mistakes like this ;P

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    46. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US economy is falling down the toilet and you didn't even noticed it, ne ? ^_^

    47. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Which is a very good thing. You're expected to work until you're about sixty, but what if the company decides to replace you with a much cheaper engineer when you're fifty? You won't get another job. Not even with a verbal anilingus of a resume. Essentially you're forced into unemployment, because nobody wants to hire someone that old and going freelance only works in some cases.

      This happened to my father: He was laid offf in his early to middle fifties from a well-paid position as truck fleet manager and chief of workplace safety (or however that would be called in English) when the business was restructured (essentially the entire upper to middle management was fired). On the job market there were no openings fitting his skills or he was overqualified or he was too old. He couldn't retire as he was too young and he couldn't stay unemployed either, because that way his pension would quickly diminish into nothing. In the end he did some qualification courses (because those don't count as unemployment, saving some of his pension) and made a deal with the employment office that they keep him listed as looking for work but don't actually send any offers. Still, this has taken a hefty bite out of our living standard.

      In his case the thing was legally sound, due to the restructuring. But in other cases older employees have some protection against being fired and that's good those older employees would hit the social net, causing the state to lose money and they would be unproductive, causing even more damage.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    48. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by ccp · · Score: 1
      Mandriva has every right to terminate his employment for _nearly_ any reason.

      So you are an expert in French labor laws, no?

      Because unless you're one, AND know something the rest of us don't, you should have written:

      If Mandriva were an Usian corporation, it would have every right to terminate his employement for _nearly_any reason...


      Cheers,

    49. Re:You gotta be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, in the uk/europe, senior management are rarely fired, even for gross incompetency. They will usually get paid off to leave, a nice wad. I thought that was the way in usa too?

  13. How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have been fired only 48 hours after working for one place with no reason at all other than the manager didn't like me.

    Most states are right to work so they can do that.

    Employers have the right to fire people on spot for any reason at all. The reason why I am agaisnt suing is because its unfair that blue collar workers such as myself have no right at all and get paid 1/5th what the upper middle class white collar workers do which do sue for wrongfull termination. We have no rights at all and have to sign contracts making us employed at will.

    And most states even the CEO can be fired for no reason at all if its a right to work state.

    Also the shareholders own the company and yes if the CEO owns less then %50 of the company then he can be fired. Its just part of business. ANd if you owned a company I think most people would have a different opinion as bad workers can make or break your company and take your dreams down with it when you go under.

    1. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by manifoldronin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Employers have the right to fire people on spot for any reason at all. The reason why I am agaisnt suing is because its unfair that blue collar workers such as myself have no right at all and get paid 1/5th what the upper middle class white collar workers do which do sue for wrongfull termination. We have no rights at all and have to sign contracts making us employed at will.
      I'm confused by your reasoning there. It seems to me that, if you don't have any right to sue while some others do, you should strive for your right to sue, rather than asking others not to.
      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    2. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Most states are right to work so they can do that.

      France, where Mandrake was based and where his employment contract was signed, is not a state of the United States of America.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint: Mandriva is not based in the USA.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by OppressiveGiant · · Score: 1

      Of course we don't have the whole story. You don't fire people just because it's fun and games. It's entirely possible that he broke the contract first somehow.

      --
      i could not think of anything clever.
    5. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 4, Informative

      As you may be aware, there are other countries with their own laws. Mandriva being based in France, which has laws to protect employees against abusive (ie, not motivated by repetitive mistakes of the employee, and a bunch of other factors) layoffs, Gael can sue Mandriva. Then some particular kind of judges (called "juges des prud'hommes") will decide if it's ok or not, and of course, if it's not, they won't force him back into Mandriva, but Mandriva may have to give some indemnities.

    6. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by jgc7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most states are right to work so they can do that.

      "Right to work" has nothing to do with termination rules. It basically means that a worker isn't required to join a union. Many union factories require that all blue collar workers are part of the union, but in "right to work" states, these policies are outlawed. Hence the term "right to work(without joining the union)".

      --
      70% of statistics are made up.
    7. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Funny

      France, where Mandrake was based and where his employment contract was signed, is not a state of the United States of America.

      A regrettable oversight. We'll get to you guys once we're done with Iran.

    8. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      we don't want that land anyway, it's lousy with frenchmen.

    9. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Considering how much spin I've seen on articles lately from the original text, I wouldn't put too much value on the "goine to sue!" claim until it goes up on Duval's personal site or before the courts.

    10. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Bullshit! EVERYWHERE is the USA, goddammit!

      Using the traditional naming style, The US hereby declares that Japan will be called "Now THAT is West" Virginia and Chile is hereafter to be referred to as "REALLY Fucking South Dakota."

      That is all.

    11. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Theatetus · · Score: 1
      Many union factories require that all blue collar workers are part of the union, but in "right to work" states, these policies are outlawed. Hence the term "right to work(without joining the union)".

      Ha! I bet you think the "Patriot Act" encourages "Patriotism" too, huh? That may have been the basis of right to work laws a few decades ago, but as far as I've seen every "right to work" law now means "at-will employment". So you might as well call them "right to be fired for no reason" states.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    12. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1
      Perhaps they confused "Right to Work" (which disolved the unions) with "Employment At-Will", which
      means that employment is presumed to be voluntary and indefinite for both employees and employers. As an at-will employee under the doctrine, you may quit your job whenever and for whatever reason you want, usually without consequence. In turn, at-will employers may terminate you whenever and for whatever reason they want, usually without consequence.
    13. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by jgc7 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? See here or here. Just because you and your friends use "right to work" and "at-will employement" interchangably, doesn't make it right.

      --
      70% of statistics are made up.
    14. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Two major problems with your rant there.

      1. As others have said, the US has not yet staked its claim on France. I'm not saying you're jumping the gun, but there's plenty of other countries to take over first.

      2. "right to work" has nothing to do with at will employment. "right to work" means that you cannot be forced to join the union as part of a new job.

    15. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signed,

      Bush and Dick

    16. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by menkhaura · · Score: 1, Troll

      Don't even mention that, or they will surrender to the US just to be on the safe side!

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    17. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A regrettable oversight. We'll get to you guys once we're done with Iran.

      And Iran was right after Iraq wasn't it? With the way you're doing in Iraq, we will be greet in you, say, some time next century?

    18. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Malor · · Score: 1

      "Right to Work" means different things in different states. In California, it means you can't be held to non-competes.... in general, California is very employee-friendly.

      In Georgia (and most of the South), the employer has all the power. Down here, "Right to Work" means "Right to Get Screwed".

    19. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boring.

      Let's pay Iran to annex Texas. Win/win for everyone.

    20. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      Employers have the right to fire people on spot for any reason at all.
      Actually, this is not correct. Employers can fire for no reason, but there are many reasons for firing that can get the employer into deep legal problems -- think employment discrimination laws.

      That's why most employers refuse to ever give a reason for firing anyone, unless it is obviously part of a mass layoff.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    21. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that just prove discrimination?

      I mean you dont have anything to prove he/she was a bad worker?

      I see most people get in trouble for things everyone gets in trouble for or they are intentionally given things that are impossible to accomplish on purpose so they have a paper trail on why to fire someone. That way if they sue they can use the papertrail to show he/she was inept due to their job performance.

    22. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      I mean you dont have anything to prove he/she was a bad worker?

      I see most people get in trouble for things everyone gets in trouble for or they are intentionally given things that are impossible to accomplish on purpose so they have a paper trail on why to fire someone. That way if they sue they can use the papertrail to show he/she was inept due to their job performance.

      For many employers (especially smaller employers), it is much simpler to say "you're fired!" and refuse to give any reason. It's hard to prove any kind of discrimination in such a case, unless there is a pattern.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    23. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O VRAIMENT?

    24. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very curious if this works both way. Does an employee have to have a legitimate reason for quitting a job? Could an employer get economic damages from an employee if they took another job without the employer making repetitive mistakes and possibly other factors?

    25. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by bhima · · Score: 1

      Fuck! I don't know whether to laugh or cry!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    26. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      He fired you because you can't write correct english and can't spell.

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    27. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1

      Nope, the law protects the weakest. Please not that everything I'm telling you is subject to change, and that's why there have been demonstrations in Paris these last weeks (and I've got friends right there now demonstrating, too bad it was my exams week). Anyway, let's see how it (used to?) work(s):

      There are two main types of contracts (and 1 quite recent called CNE I won't talk of because it sucks, and the other one is CPE and that's the reason of the demos so, I won't elaborate either)... CDD or "Contrat à Durée Déterminée" (Contract with a determined duration) and CDI (Contrat à Durée Indeterminée, Contract with an indetermined duration).

      If you've got a CDD, it will finish some day (decided when signing your contract) and may be renewed with a CDD or a CDI. If you've got a CDI, you *CANNOT* be fired unless you make serious/repetitive mistakes and respect your contract *WITHOUT* indemnities. Your employer may ask you to leave in 3 monthes (minimal time), give you a day per week to find a new job (and often give you a recommendation to get rid of you). If you refuse, or if he wants to fire you directly, he'll have to pay you the 3 (more or less) months of salary.

      CDD are often relatively short so the employer prefers to wait when it's over, then they don't have to renew if they don't want.

      Gael was of course under a CDI, thus he can sue for abusive layoff if he's not ok with the indemnities already proposed.

      Now employers can of course sue an employee if he doesn't respect his contract (ie: not coming to the job, breaking a NDA, etc) however I never heard of an employee under a CDI quitting his job impromptly, and under a CDD, well the employer won't care, he'll find someone else.

      Once again, this system is unfortunately subject to change (because employers hate CDI, of course, but keep it mind that it allows employees to buy houses, cars, and have a project for their family life, because it's a guarantee of a regular income).

    28. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the excellent reply. You have given me a great starting point for research.

      Nope, the law protects the weakest.

      By this statement do you mean that the law only protects employees or is there some kind of judicial test to determine who is weak or powerful in a given situation. For example, if an employee has ten times the net worth and twice the salary of his boss who is a small business owner, could the employer be determined the weaker party?

    29. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by TrippyZ · · Score: 1

      Well if you intend to do that you'd better return the Statue of Liberty.

    30. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1

      There is no such test, but there was once such a spirit (what we call here "L'Esprit des Lois", The Spirit of Laws, which is first and foremost a book by Montesquieu). When making new laws, our MPs (we call them "députés" but that's no sheriff deputee) used to check a few things before voting: is the new law giving a special advantage to a category of citizen or is it the same for all? does it protect the weak, or does it make the strong already stronger (or does it make the weak even weaker?!) ? When you reach a good equilibrium, then it's a good law. At least this is my vision. Anyway this time is over since the majority of our Parliament (Assemblée Nationale) has changed and we have been witness of incredibly poor, unfair, and partial laws these last years; ie: DRMs just passed, work precarity passed (CDIs no more under a certain age), police spying passed, ... Let's just hope our next presidential elections may 2007 won't be won by the same ass-licking demagogic but tyrannic and antidemocratic bastards (aka Chirac, Sarkozy, Villepin, Copé, Perben, etc)

    31. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you again for your reply,

      I apologize for only having been able to offer questions. I have read about the protests and I feel that many things around the world are happening all at once. I nervous but optimistic.

    32. Re:How is it abusive? He shouldn't sue at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought only USians fell for that bullshit. France has spent most of her history at war and is damn good at it.

  14. PCLinuxOS seems to have arrived ... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    just in time.

    Mandrake 8.2 was that distro's best release, IMO. I left it when they had that "burn your CDROM up" problem. Not for that, but because I felt it was going down hill. Now I run SimplyMEPIS.

    A few weeks ago I booted a LiveCD of PCLinuxOS. It is, IMO, much better than Mandriva, from which it is derived. They have cleaned many of the bugs out. For those who run Mandriva I hope that PCLinuxOS has the horsepower to keep that distro alive on their own. I prefer distros that use *.deb packages so I won't be leaving SimplyMEPIS anytime soon.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:PCLinuxOS seems to have arrived ... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Try ubuntu then. They've got LiveCD's, use .deb, have a huge community and it's all centered around the user. I don't know how good SimplyMEPIS is, but it's worth a try if you want to look at something else.

    2. Re:PCLinuxOS seems to have arrived ... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I was a 9.1 fan myself, though I also liked 2005LE.

      10.0 and 10.1 had problems with my mobo (VIA KT266A) -- I kept getting USB bulk_timeout errors on install.

      2005 installed with no problem.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:PCLinuxOS seems to have arrived ... by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Definitely my main distro.

      The community support is great, most often posts get responded to by the big "Tex" himself.

      Also, what is the fuss about Ubuntu. It doesn't even have the config panels such as diskdrake, etc. Nothing else I have tried touches diskdrake, especialy not Qparted which opften greys out half the menu options for no readily explained reason. In fact, no other distro has anything close to this. Shame on them! I am just installing RR64 now and it still relies on KDE and Gnomes half-baked config panels. I can't even set up a monitor manually. I guess I will have to edit xorg.conf to do that.

      I don't know why more distros don't import the Mandriva panels. To me, that is what makes it much easier to use than any other type of disto I have tried.

  15. An opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I sincerely hope this does not affect the course of the distro


    I sincerely hope this *does* affect the course severely. I hope Gael Duval forks the project and starts up a competitor and successfully competes with Mandriva who know longer has any idea what a community is.

    1. Re:An opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be great. Yet another Linux distro to add to the list.

      I can't wait.

    2. Re:An opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My thought exactly. There are way too many distros, each with its own way of doing stuff. If we really want Linux on the desktop, there should be fewer distros, not more. This kind of infighting just leads to confusion.

    3. Re:An opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Horseshit. Forking is a natural occurance in FOSS. Survival of the fitest and all. If Gael can pull off something that is better then that will be Mandriva's loss. If he can't, then that is Gael's loss. Either way the community is better off with more choices not less.

  16. Please.....'abusive layoff'?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Suing for "abusive layoff."

    wtf? Is there such thing as a 'feel-good' layoff? If you're going to sue for wrongful dismaissal, at least get the wording right if you bitch publicly

  17. Help me out here. by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is a just business transaction. It happens all the time. If Gael Duval wants to, he can just create (yet) another distro that will abide by his Linux philosophy. How is this a tragedy or something bad - other than for him - maybe?

    --
    Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
  18. When will the Duvaliva iso's be ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be a hardcore Mandrake user, but since the merger the QC has totally sucked. I couldn't ever get a 2005 or 2006 install to work quite right and I've dropped my subscription. Getting fired sucks, but please Mr. Duval, bring us another great distro instead of spending years in court.

  19. WHAT?! ON EARTH?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's a strong contributor? But he happens to be in job they have to lay off?

    Bean counter alert.

  20. DIE LIBERTARIAN DIE! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Nice way to work in a completely inappropriate reference to libertarian ideals on what is essentially a spat between a company and its founder.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:DIE LIBERTARIAN DIE! by orson_of_fort_worth · · Score: 1

      Flamebait and insightful. What's a mod to do?

    2. Re:DIE LIBERTARIAN DIE! by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Concentrate more on promoting than on demoting" quoth the moderator guidelines...

  21. Say what, now? by DysenteryInTheRanks · · Score: 5, Funny
    The "exclusive IRC interview?" Not exactly Mike Wallace or Sam Donaldson, is it?

    Seriously, though, the White House press corps should pick this up. "Next on NBC Nightly News, our exclusive IRC interview with the president."

    * PublicistLackey has joined #whouse
    * StonezzzPhilipsNBC has joined #whouse
    * W has joined #whouse

    [StonezzzPhilipsNBC] Prez, why r u h8ing on detainees @ Gitmo + Abu?
    * StonezzzPhilips kicked from #whouse
    [W] Next question?

    1. Re:Say what, now? by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      * W is away - gone, if anyone talks in the next 25 minutes as me it's smcleln being an asshole -
      <W> HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:Say what, now? by David_W · · Score: 1

      Quoting bash is like masturbating, people know you do it. ;)

    3. Re:Say what, now? by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Dude, I have a problem. I'm so addicted to bash.org. I use quotes from bash in daily conversation, and no one but me gets it, so I chuckle to myself.

      --
      sig?
  22. but the product declined by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was a dedicated drake user for years. And yes, I bought their product. I bought 7.0, 7.2, and 9.2. It always recognized all my hardware, was easy to upgrade, and had all the necessary tools, etc. Then 10.x kinda sucked, and the latest incarnations were poor. Hardware recognition slacked, it didn't install on the same system that 9.x installed on, and now, they have subscriber support only for some wifi cards.

    I installed ubuntu and never looked back. it recognized all my hardware (even the USB wifi), and apt-get is far superior. It's a sad day for sure, but they only have themselves to blame. They made poor financial decisions and it hurt their product. Now, I do confess to having been an iBook user for a few years and haven't used linux nearly as much. Most of my development is LAMP, java, python, etc., and it's all the same on OS X or linux. OO.org runs great, and so does GIMP, and with fink/darwinports, I don't "need" linux. So, I haven't used a "PC" in quite some time, but that doesn't diminsh the fact that my one remianing PC at homeruns ubuntu not mandriva.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:but the product declined by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      and now, they have subscriber support only for some wifi cards.

      It is possible that Ubuntu recognized your wifi card out of the box and Mandriva didn't, but that certainly isn't because of "subscriber support only". All Free drivers are included with the download edition, proprietary stuff is either in the boxed set or available with a Mandriva Club membership.

    2. Re:but the product declined by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu, as a rule, doesn't include any non-free or non-open content either - so it's a fair comparison to the non-subscriber mandriva, correct?

      and there is no subscriber option in ubuntu... So the no-proprietary-content and free ubuntu does what you would have to pay to do using mandriva. And we're talking about wifi, which is notoriously hard to make work in most linux distros. That makes you go hmmmm.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    3. Re:but the product declined by RedStar · · Score: 1

      Not a direct comment on ReinoutS answer but when using Mandriva PLF - Penguin Liberation Front is a must. If you lookup Easy urpmi it will give everything you need to get a proper Mandriva Update setup. Then you can just enjoy a better Mandriva ;) .

    4. Re:but the product declined by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      So the no-proprietary-content and free ubuntu does what you would have to pay to do using mandriva.

      No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that the hardware recognition in Ubuntu might have been better in this specific case. I don't believe that Mandriva includes any non-proprietary drivers in the Club edition that aren't shipped with the Free edition.

  23. In contrib by lbbros · · Score: 1

    OO.org 2 was in contrib, as far as I recall.

    --
    A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    1. Re:In contrib by Joe+Enduser · · Score: 1

      True. But contrib means no support, no updates. OOO is just too important to rely on that.

  24. Come on Kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on kids, don't be like Microsoft.

  25. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just plain LOL... All my imaginary mod point are belong to you!

    1. Re:MOD UP by HiRoll3r · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Funniest thing I've read in a while.

  26. Looks like the founder got unfounded. by elucido · · Score: 1

    I guess, he is now layed off, the question is this, who owns the company now? Can we trust them?

  27. 'abusive layoff' by weierstrass · · Score: 3, Funny

    In France, a country in Western Europe (near Belgium), they have such a thing as 'licenciement abusif'. This is a standard term of employment law.

    'Licenciement' is French (the language spoken in France, and other countries such as Belgium) for layoff. 'Abusif' is French for 'abusive'.

    HTH. HAND.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  28. Ouch. by ninjaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Mandrake since 2001, when I switched from Debian to get a version of X that would support my new video card. At the time, it was was flourishing, engaged the community surrounding it, and was hiring developers who were working on projects that were making crucial advances for Linux. One that comes to mind was the developer of a partition resizer that would work on NTFS back when when all the other distros were instructing their users to use Partition Magic.

    Of course, all that great work had a price tag attached to it, so when Mandrake Club was announced, I was first in line to join. The idea back then was that it was a voluntary donation with no extra benefits other than supporting continued development.

    Unfortunately, once the club started to take off, they started closing things off to the public one by one to drive membership numbers higher. Now it's to the point where standard members can't even download the full set of CD images for their $60 yearly membership fees.

    Something seems to have really changed in a big way since the Connectiva merger, though. With the release of Mandriva 2006, they've been focusing on marketing deals like that with Skype. Then, there was the worldwide Mandriva party, where the locations weren't announced until the night before... until then, there was just a form to fill out for organizations to get corporate schwag.

    Also, I was reading on the Mandriva forums earlier that the reason their cut of X.org doesn't work with my ATI Radeon 7500 is that they "chose the wrong X.org" and are staying with it due to an Intel marketing agreement. Luckily, seerofsouls.org has working RPM's, but needing to depend on a third party to provide core components of the distribution is not exactly ideal.

    Anyway, it looks like their management has decided that it wants to be Red Hat or Novell. I wish them good luck with that. I've seen it mentioned that PCLinuxOS is trying to be what Mandrake was, so hopefully they will provide a good upgrade path from Mandriva so I can get off this sinking ship without getting my clothes too wet.

    1. Re:Ouch. by ReinoutS · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now it's to the point where standard members can't even download the full set of CD images for their $60 yearly membership fees.

      Of course, the fact that you can download any missing packages by adding a random public FTP mirror to your urpmi media makes that a non-issue.

      Luckily, seerofsouls.org has working RPM's, but needing to depend on a third party to provide core components of the distribution is not exactly ideal.

      A version of X.org that works with your graphics card, too, is included in the distro updates that are downloaded right during the installation procedure. Have you tried running MandrivaUpdate?

    2. Re:Ouch. by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      The Mandrake Club is what moved me back to Debian, too. Running the Ubuntu flaovr of Debian, these days, and not looking back :-)

    3. Re:Ouch. by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu is not Debian. It's Debian-based, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it a "flavor of Debian".

    4. Re:Ouch. by ninjaz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info! I noticed that the packages from the other CD's are indeed on public mirrors, which does indeed make ISO downloads a moot point, and the official X.org is working again. :)

      I had only seen the set of new Xorg packages that recently showed up with a priority of security. I took that as meaning I'd only get security fixes from those, and chosen the SoS security updates instead.

    5. Re:Ouch. by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      im going to jump in here and just say Chicken = redhat mandriva wild turkey = debian Ubuntu wild boar =bsd tofu = Windows pork =OSX just because the packaging is different (Ubuntu comes in a neat foam tray) does not mean they are different Flavours

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    6. Re:Ouch. by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Well, *-based is what I meant by "flavor", as in: Mandrake started as a "flavor" of redhat.

  29. Re:What really happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From his blog...

    I looked for a laptop for my wife who is studying neurosciences and basically needs it for ImageJ, and office applications. [snip] After spending hours looking for the best model, we finally choose the Acer 3003 wlmi which can be found for around 800 euro/1000 USD with either 512 or 1024 MB RAM, a nice wide-screen, DVD Dual layer burner and a Ultra ATA hard-disk.

    Maybe it was much less than 800 euro.

  30. Abusive Layoff by duffbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google returns effectively 1 hit for this term. Can anyone elaborate? What exactly would constitute an abusive layoff?

    --
    "This wound is beyond my ability to heal. We need Elvis medicine!"
    1. Re:Abusive Layoff by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Well it's like the normal layoff, except the don't use vaseline as they screw you.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  31. Just deserts by Black+Art · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now he knows how all those Americans he fired felt when he closed down all the American operations for Mardrake a number of years back. (Just for being Americans.)

    Could not have happened to a more deserving fellow.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  32. Lycoris + Mandrake = Time bomb by JimiSpier · · Score: 0

    Lycoris was a great distro, but I didn't like the Redmond mindset that the founder took with him from the evil empire. I cut my teeth on Mandrake and I had a feeling as soon as these two entities joined forces one of two things could happen: 1. A really awesome user friendly distro, or 2. The Redmond money hungry mindset would spread like cancer.. Unfortunately I believe that Mr. Mandrake had some core differences about how things should be ran which hindered the "bottom line"... That gave Redmond clone enough reason to fire him..

    I just hope that this doesn't become a trend in the GNU/Linux community, computers in general were about fun and learning until big business started getting greedy.. Linux is the last man standing when it comes to Free, Fun and Educational..

    --
    Jimi Spier
    www.jimispier.com - My tunes
  33. Ulteo copyright infringers? by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Duval's future plans -- in addition to the lawsuit -- involve a new open source project called Ulteo.

    Ulteo seem to have ripped off Mozilla.org's web design. They even use the same class names. If you view their stylesheets, you'll see:

    /* mozilla.org Base Styles
    * maintained by fantasai
    * (classes defined in the Markup Guide - http://mozilla.org/contribute/writing/markup )
    */

    If you read the Mozilla.org site licensing policies, you'll see:

    The rights in the trademarks, logos, service marks of the Mozilla Foundation, as well as the look and feel of this web site, are not licensed under the Creative Commons license, and to the extent they are works of authorship (like logos and graphic design), they are not included in the work that is licensed under those terms.

    Seems to me that Mozilla.org want their text copied, but not their site design, which is the exact opposite of what Ulteo have done.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:Ulteo copyright infringers? by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      So what? Open source is all about copying other people's hard work. It's part of what makes it great.

    2. Re:Ulteo copyright infringers? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Except Mozilla.org's website design isn't open source.

    3. Re:Ulteo copyright infringers? by skeeterbug · · Score: 1

      at least they changed the margins. -lol- that is bad, though. they didn't even change the color of the main body of the page. there is no shame to their game.

    4. Re:Ulteo copyright infringers? by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Even the menu's on the left (in about) are identical... Ulteo: "The easiest system to rip off web design" - I wonder if Mozilla know about this?

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    5. Re:Ulteo copyright infringers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't look like they did a good job of it either, it doesn't render properly in IE 6

  34. Mandriva went downhill fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a move like this doesn't surprise me.

    I was an avid Mandrake user until it became Mandriva. The quality of the distro and the community seemed to take a turn in the wrong direction. After sampling a few distros, I finally settled on Ubuntu.

  35. Re:Give me a break by opkool · · Score: 1

    What I wonder is how a former-VP :

    * who has been asked to depart the company (as a hint that his services are not needed anymore, and he is offered an easy and honourable way out),
    * who instead decides to stay and start a new department, ... manages to only put out a 3-pages PDF that was only mildly interesting.

    After any merger, there are always redundant positions. Gael Duval should have got the hint and leave with a nice press release saying something like "I'll be pursuing my goals as in this momment in my life I want to do blah blah blah.".

    This would have been nice of him. He would have kept an open door at Mandriva. And any company would have liked how he had exited his company.

    Now, he is a walking problem. Do you think any company would like to hire a manager that sues his employer?

    I don't think so.

    "It's not personal, it's businness"

    BTW, I use Mandriva, and I've used for a long time. Mandriva is pretty good, works for me, does all what I want, I have no trouble with it. All the FUD read here by Mandriva-haters ("rpms are bad", "apt-get is the best", "ubuntu is dah shiznitz", "Gentoo is the only way", "PCLinuxOS does everything pus more") is just FUD.

    Peace

  36. Yeah, sure by Omaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the US we have a better end-run around that sort of thing. We just place unreasonable goals and expectations on our employees, underpay them, and ride them as hard as we can. Then when they begin to come apart at the seams (and begin to manifest the personality traits of someone who's being driven to the edge of their sanity) we can label them as underperforming, or bad behavior, or anti-social. If they don't acquiesce to the subsequent managerial flogging we can then terminate them. The company documentation will, of course, read "behavioral issues".

    No. We don't fire on a whim. What we do is create the situation and then blame the victim.

    --
    The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
    1. Re:Yeah, sure by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Then go find a better company to work at, such companies would in general be more efficient.

  37. replaced by Ubuntu by idlake · · Score: 1

    From my point of view, the place of Mandrake as an easy-to-use desktop distribution has been taken by Ubuntu. I know--they are very different distributions internally, but to me, they feel similar.

  38. At will instead of Right To Work by ejWasTaken · · Score: 1

    I believe the term we are looking for is employment at-will. I don't know about France, but several states have the concept of at-will employment. For more info see: http://jobsearchtech.about.com/od/laborlaws/l/aa09 2402.htm

  39. People actually use Mandrake/Mandriva? by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    That was always the 'lamor' or 'linux for windows dummies' distro as far as I thought.

    Now, Ubuntu and Gentoo cover that market niche, so I'd have to say this is a (sad, but) good thing for the guy.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  40. Donate to a for-profit entity? by massysett · · Score: 1
    The idea back then was that it was a voluntary donation with no extra benefits other than supporting continued development.

    This always interests me. Donate money to a for-profit entity in order to further its pursuit of profits? Why, exactly? I have donated to Wikipedia, for example, because I can see its budget and know that the money will go to where it's needed--hosting fees and equipment, for example. Why would I donate to Encyclopedia Britannica?

    Similarly, why would I donate to Mandriva, or to Canonical (Ubuntu Co.) or to Red Hat? I don't want to fatten anybody's pocket. If they want donations, they could go non-profit. If the for-profit entities had a product worth paying for, I'd pay for that. Otherwise I'd rather donate money to a not-for-profit distro (like Gentoo, or Debian) or to a non-profit that furthers free software (like the Free Software Foundation.)

    Our present forum isn't exempt from this thing that puzzles me: OSTG, for-profit operators of SourceForge, solicit donations for SF. Why would I give to them?

  41. Re:You gotta be kidding me. (MOD PARENT UP!) by goldspider · · Score: 1

    Thank you! Thank you!!! I'm so tired of people who believe that the more government regulation there is, the closer the economy comes to some kind of workers' utopia. People don't understand that the balance of power CAN, in fact, tilt too far in favor of workers, and France is a prime example of what happens.

    There's a good reason why France has 10+ percent unemployment, and it's not because there isn't work to be done. Employers just won't risk hiring people because of business-hostile labor laws.

    And think of the people that do have jobs; they're being forced to pick up the slack!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  42. I for one am sad by Dollyknot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For me computers have always been a hobby, I started out around 1983 with a TRS80 then a BBC micro, taught myself assembler, in Z80 then 6502, then I had to leave my hobby because my job as a truck driver meant I was away most of the time. Then around 1995 I came off the road and took up my old hobby again, a 286 running 3.1 then '95 then '98 then ME, finally the penny dropped.

    I realised how immoral a closed source operating system is and decided to give Linux a try.

    This was around the year 2000, Suse to be precise, could not get on the net with it, could not get Xserver to work. Then I tried Coral linux, Xserver worked fine, could not get dialup to work, then I tried Redhat that did not work either.

    Then I heard about Mandrake (probably on Slash :) at last I had an open source OS that seemed to work with hardly any hassle.

    Gael Duval, opened the open source OS door for me and for many others I would imagine. What the organisation that Duval started, solved was the driver problem, for this he deserves respect and support from the Linux community and I hope the Slashdot community.

    Regards

    Peter

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
  43. Pull an Apple by sankyuu · · Score: 1

    Supposing Duval started a new project... any chance Mandriva would screw up, acquire Duval, and make him chief once more? Something like the Apple fairy tale.

    1. Re:Pull an Apple by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like narrativium at work. (Yes, I'm currently reading the latest Pratchett/Stewart/Cohen.)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  44. Another end run by Omaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't be done. Once the company is through running their employees out the door they label them as bad in HR databases. Don't give me that crap about wrongful dismissal or slander claims. Lawyers don't give a rat's ass unless you already have a pile of money to donate to them.

    No. Here in America we've got our own little system for fucking people over. If you've got it good well then more power to you. Don't act like your lucky lot in life is the same for everyone.

    --
    The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
    1. Re:Another end run by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Don't act like your lucky lot in life is the same for everyone.

      Same to you. It's not anyone else's fault you stayed in a losing situation and got fucked over. You were free to seek employment elsewhere at any point.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Another end run by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll try to talk more simply you seem to be one of those who needs it:

      Can't be done. Once the company is through running their employees out the door they label them as bad in HR databases.

      Then you're an utter nitwit, why the fuck did you stay that long in such a bad situation. READ what I said, I said you can find a different company to work for I DIDN'T say you can find a different company only once you get fired. The days of corporations caring for you for your whole life are over, and if you don't find a good employer simply try again.

      Even if you do get fired, I'm sure smaller companies don't check HR databases or are more likely to ignore them.

      Don't give me that crap about wrongful dismissal or slander claims. Lawyers don't give a rat's ass unless you already have a pile of money to donate to them.

      You've already been fired, I never said anything about that. I said what to do before you get fired.

      No. Here in America we've got our own little system for fucking people over. If you've got it good well then more power to you. Don't act like your lucky lot in life is the same for everyone.

      As the other poster said, and you don't act like everyone was stupid enough to stay with a bad employer and get fucked over.

  45. Underlaying issue is revenue by viking2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a software engineer, it is frustrating to see how hard it is for software companies to find a profitable business model.

    I have actively tried to find work with companies where the core product is software. The reaon is simply that of opportunity. In a hospital, at an attorneys office etc, a software developer can never be the strong voice in corporate meetings. It is the attorney and physician respectively. The SW engineer can not advance to the top of the corporate ladder.

    The closest I have found is engineering companes like Cisco where engineers are paid well. Although an engineering company, the focus here is still not software, but hardware.

    Most High tech companies sell boxes and software is used by the sales department to land the deal. Often discounting it 100% at "no charge".

    It is then hard to fight with the HW group for resources when you have little revenue to justify your departments existence.

    We all love to hate Microsoft, but they are one of the few companies that have been successfull and profitable as a software company.

    How should a company like Mandrake structure their business model so they can be consistently profitable, and not have to go through bankruptcies and tough layoffs?

    I need to be able to have a well paying stable job so I can put my kids through college. Any solutions out there?

    1. Re:Underlaying issue is revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I picture software as becoming more of a service than a product -- the need for code is obviously only going to grow, but with the ease of transfer and duplication, selling one-time, single-user licenses is beginning to seem anachronistic to me. The lengths companies go to to keep their work proprietary...

      Commissioned applications and support contracts are still game, though, and Free/Open Source projects can't replace that. OSS makes sense to me as volunteered work, not a donated product, and companies regularly need new applications that wouldn't normally be written for general use. The cutting-edge, specific work tends to come from programmers with a corporate or academic sponsor.

  46. Any Linux company for sale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUSE was sold to Novell, founder of SUSE fired.

    Mandrake was sold, founder fired.

    Any Linux company for sale? How about Ubuntu? Tomahawk? may be you guys can earn lot of money by selling the company than trying to earn. who cares firing you then, if you get good enough money to go to moon.

  47. Corporate market more and more? by kbulgrien · · Score: 1
    Mr. Duval said in his IRC interview...

    "It seems that the company is going to address the corporate market more and more.... My opinion is that we should have stuck to the roots (individuals and SOHO)."

    I have never seriously considered any other distribution since I bought my first box (7.1). Linux had not really arrived enough to replace my home Windows system, so I waited for 8.0 before trying seriously again. As a systems engineer working with UNIX systems, and after having great difficulty with UnixWare 2.0 at home, and lack of results with WGS Linux, I was glad to see Mandrake "arrive". I finally committed to Linux. Then I had an opportunity to manage a server for my engineering department and RedHat 7.2 with Mandrake 9.x, then 10.1, and now Corporate Server 3.0. I've tried others... and yet remain a Mandriva user, so something is very good over there.

    For all this, I must painfully acknowledge that Mandriva just convincing in any role that touts helping the community. The user has been told that if they pay, they will will get help. The user says show me what I get for free, and then I will believe, and will happily pay when it really matters.

    Mandriva has always offered more up front for the community in terms of graphical, customized tools for configuring the system so that the job gets done, but that is about where it ends. "After the sale" the user must largely rely on their own resourcefulness. The superiour Mandriva tools buy most users in, but consider that today, MandrivaExpert has 2600+ open issues dating back to 2003. Bugzilla is full of issues _never_ responded to. Corporate Server 3.0 has issues against it that have been in Anthill and Bugzilla for going on two years.

    I say all this to say, Mr. Duval, you might as well not bother suing if you care about the community. Mandriva will either accomplish something for the community, or they will cripple along meaning well, but missing the main realization of how to hit big-time.

    Mr. Duval, MandrivaExpert, Anthill, and Bugzilla all show that Mandriva does not know how to support the community. Mandriva will not make it big time in the Corporate Community based on my most recent experience with Corporate Server 3.0. Please do not prove to the community that they do not matter to you either. A suit will only take from that community. This organization can spend more time on long distance explaining how a problem does not fall within scope than it would take to solve a loyal user's problem.

    Leave them be. They will either become of more value to the "root" community or business community, or they will not. Let them do it to themselves without doing yourself a disservice, and by crippling what little support they do provide "after the sale". They have not been connected that tightly to either a business or a community root inspite of what one might have thought.

    Signed, a devoted, paying Mandrake/Mandriva user, today and tomorrow, but maybe, just maybe, not forever.

  48. Re:You gotta be kidding me. (MOD PARENT UP!) by alienw · · Score: 1

    10% unemployment is not that bad if there isn't a lot of underemployment and miscounting like there is in the US. The US has an artificially low unemployment rate because the labor department doesn't count all people who are not employed, just the ones recently laid off. They also do not take underemployment into account: someone who works retail or fast food just because they can't find work in his/her profession is considered fully employed. This can give rather misleading numbers.

  49. OT: What makes Ubuntu so user friendly? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    I have a spare machine, but it is already taken up by FC5Test3 and I am not currently in the mood to dive into another disto myself. But I can hold my curiousity nolonger. What makes Ubuntu so user friendly? I take it that you have first hand knowledge.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  50. Gael, please join Gentoo! by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    Please, please!

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  51. Mandriva Messed up this invoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous because I realized someone might kill my free webhosting ;-) I Just got an invoice.... March 9 It lists someone else's company name My Proper Name My billing information My Phone Number someone else's company fax [working] ;-) and of cousre the transaction goes through ;-) It was a surprise tht it was a delayed 7 months of monthly subscriptions in one month.

    1. Re:Mandriva Messed up this invoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the invoice stripped of course ;-}
      -
      Billing Information -- Receipt Number:  28xxx8-CAN                     -- Bill Date:    08-Mar-2006 19:30-

      Customer Information -- Bill To: Company: who has Nothing 2 do with me;  Full Name: yshouldI releaseit   :-}             ; Address: CorrectlyMatches;   Address(2):  Have2lookitup ; City: Correct; State:  NB; Zip Code: Correct; Country: Canada; Phone: 506-Correct; Fax: 876-952-xxxx ; Email: mine@example.ca  [so I got a copy of the electronic invoice]

      Shipping Address  -- Bill To: Company: who has Nothing 2 do with me;  Full Name: yshouldI releaseit   :-}             ; Address: CorrectlyMatches;   Address(2):  Have2lookitup ; City: Correct; State:  NB; Zip Code: Correct; Country: Canada; Phone: 506-Correct; Fax: 876-952-xxxx ; Email: mine@example.ca  [so I got a copy of the electronic invoice]<p>
      ===<P>
      Billed Items
      Code         Description    Qty PriceUSD PriceEUR AmountUSD  AmountEUR MDKUCLUBR02M MONTHLY RECOVERY [7 months missing]        1  84.00           84.00 USD
      Subtotal:  84 USD
      Taxes not applicable  0.00 USD
      Shipping: SHIPPING AND HANDLING...  0 USD
      Taxes not applicable  0.00 USD
      Total:  84 USD
      ===<P>
      Payment Information
      Payment method:                         Bank Transfer (IBAN/SWIFT)

      To order any products, You must transfer the total amount for the order to our bank by Bank Transfer (SWIFT or IBAN) following these instructions:                                                                       --
      Banque : THEMIS BANQUE
      Code Banque : 11xx9
      Code Guichet : 00xxx
      Numro de Compte : 020xxx00xF
      Cl Rib : 17
      Domiciliation : THEMIS PARIS TREILHARD
      IBAN : FRxx 1xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Fxx
      BIC / SWIFT : xxPPxxxx
      -+-_+==
      IMPORTANT: For identification purposes, make sure you include the following information with the payment order:
           MDKSTORE, 28xxxx-CAN
           lastnamehere   ;-)   almost missed it
      =--==--==
      To speed up the process, we suggest you to send by fax your proof of payment with the receipt containing your order information: with attention to : MandrakeStore Financial Services, fax: +33 1 40 41 92 00. Orders will be initiated when payment is encountered.

      For inquiries, please send a mail to the address above
      and mention the receipt number and bill date at the top of this invoice.
      <br>
      To keep in touch with the Open Source world, please visit
      http://www.mandriva.com

  52. Re:What really happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's my DSL line IP not the weblink & I'm going to sleep next

    I'll renew my ip after this post and it'll be fine when I wake up ;-)

    I _pray_ ;-)

    My free hsting is for a shared server [like 80% of us poor buggers] & i'd hate to piss of the generous buggers who donate my server location/hosting I hope you understand ;-P it's nothing personal ;-0.

    oh oh eyes are closing I bettter grab some shut eye ..

  53. urpmi kubuntu by martalli · · Score: 1

    I've recently given up my club membership, too. Really, over $100 for a year's subscription...when editions are only going to come out yearly! Mandriva did have gobs of packages...almost to the debian level. However, my main interest was all the nice proprietary software (no flames please), since I was a newbie.

    I just updated my wife's computer to kubuntu and was pleased to see how easily installing the ATI drivers were with synaptic. The Debian repositories have more software than any other distro that I know of. Other than mandriva, I had always loved straight Debian and mepis. Now I am with happy kubuntu...bye bye Mandriva, it was a nice time...

  54. Well, well, everybody hates Mandriva! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    I wonder why I'm running Mandriva 2006 with absolutely no problems (except the incredibly stupid menu editor, of course, which everyone acknowledges is braindead.)

    Everything on my machine (your standard clone) worked out of the box. I think the DSL setup wasn't as nice as Knoppix, but then nobody else's is any better that I'm aware of.

    So they fired the guy who created the company. Big deal. Happens every day. I have yet to see anybody demonstrate that this means anything about where the distro is going or how easy future versions will be to use or anything else of significance. When it happens, call me.

    And if it does go bad, well, there's plenty of other distros to try. Everybody is touting Ubuntu/Kubuntu. So far I've seen no reason to switch absent some major failing of Mandriva that might crop up. It's not hard for a distro to piss me off, though, so maybe it will happen here, too.

    I just read a review of Fedora Core where it's clear those idiots STILL haven't figured out how to do decent package management - now, instead of the perfectly usable KPackage from back in 7.3 days, they've got TWO package managers installed, NEITHER of which show you the dependencies or where the files are installed.

    Morons.

    So why am I bothering to comment on this at all? Good question...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  55. Re:He should fork it... Fork is... ulteo.com by joestar · · Score: 1

    It seems that Gaël has started to work on a mysterious new OSS OS project called Ulteo

  56. Mandriva joins BSD? by TangoCharlie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Does this sad event mark the end of the Mandriva as a distribution? Or at least the start of the end? I used Mandrake once and found it to be OK, but since then ,the heat has cirtainly been put on by distros such as Ubuntu and Linspire for ease and OpenSuSE and FC for power. We'll see.

    --
    return 0; }
    1. Re:Mandriva joins BSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gael was not AT ALL in charge of the R&D at Mandriva. Mandriva 2007 + Mandriva Corporate Server 4.0 + Mandriva Corporate Desktop 4.0 are all under development.

      Not only Gael got fired : it's a part of an "emergency" plan. Mandriva loses money and needs to reduce costs, and Gael's salary was quite huge, considering his non-critical position as a "Community coordinator".

      (Hint : I'm a Mandriva employee)

    2. Re:Mandriva joins BSD? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Gael's salary was quite huge, considering his non-critical position as a "Community coordinator".

      Yeah, the only position really critical to Mandrake would be called a "Software Quality Engineer" or somesuch. But I don't believe they have any such position...

    3. Re:Mandriva joins BSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the only position really critical to Mandrake would be called a "Software Quality Engineer" or somesuch. But I don't believe they have any such position...

      They DO have one, but it's rather poor (mostly interns) and not well-organized. "Hardware certification" department is even worse, though...

    4. Re:Mandriva joins BSD? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      They DO have one, but it's rather poor (mostly interns) and not well-organized.

      Well, that explains alot...

      They really should put more effort in this important function, if they want to survive.

  57. Mandriva boss fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this mean that Mandriva will now become a more stable and less buggy distribution?

  58. Best sentence of the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Instead, Duval agreed to move from his long-time position as vice president of communication to head a new "community department" intended "to improve Mandriva's image in the open source arena."

    Hmmm, in Mandriva's case, wouldn't a position meant to improve its image be called "quality assurance engineer"?

  59. More buggy than Mandrake? Is that even possible!? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
    It is buggy and has problems compared to the Mandrake version just before it.

    Mandrake/Mandriva has always been buggy, it's almost as if buggyness had been one of its defining "qualities".

    Years ago I was with a friend helping him to re-organize his hard disks. At a certain point in time, we needed to burn some stuff on a CD to make space.

    After burning the CD, just before rm -rf'ing the files from the hard disk, I had a hunch, and said: "Wait a minute, this is Mandrake, just lets make a diff -ur first, to be safe".

    And sure enough, all files on the CD turned out to be empty... A bug in Mandrake's mkisofs. We proceeded to download mkisofs's source, and compiled it, burned another CD with it, and that one was just fine!

    Years after, I frequently run into issues with corrupted .kde directories due to Mandrake bugs.

    More years after (at that point it was Mandriva), I encountered issues with permission management in Samba. The (numerically) same version, and same config worked just fine on Debian.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  60. Where did you go to school? by theolein · · Score: 1

    including applying for permission with the government prior to firing the person.

    Sometimes I just have to shake my head when I read crap like this. It's no wonder you americans are so fucking disconnected from reality when even your schools spread propaganda FUD.

    FWIW: Yes, bonehead, you can get fired here and no, the employer doesn't have to ask anyone for permission, but, just like in the glorious (halleluya, motherfucker) usa, you can sue for wrongful dismissal.

    Fuck.

  61. Not flaming, just curious... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    That's strange....I can have a Gentoo GRP up in under 40 mins. You must be doing something wrong...

    AFAIK, Gentoo compiles "everything" when you install it. So how is it possible to get a complete install in under 40 minutes?

    • You have a really powerful computer?
    • You only installed the strict bare minimum?
    • It's no longer true that Gentoo compiles everything, but nowadays it has pre-compiled binary packages just like everybody else?
    • The wonders of the mysterious mighty magic penguin?
    1. Re:Not flaming, just curious... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1
      • You use the binary packages, which happen to be called "the GRP"
      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  62. Yet another silver giving up Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've been a Mandriva Club silver-level member for 2.5 years now, and I'm going to let my membership lapse in a few weeks...

    I'm also not going to renew my Mandrake/Mandriva silver membership. Mandrake was my number one choice until I ran into bad stability problems with 10.1. Mandrake never answered any of my bug reports and they never released a stable kernel to fix the problem that I and several others ran into.

    The problem was solved by using a kernel from Mdk10.0 or compiling your own but the incident just left a bad taste in my mouth.

  63. You've got it all wrong by Omaze · · Score: 1

    You're assuming that the employer is at least semi-reasonble. You're not thinking about this from the proper point of view: the company is deliberately screwing their employees.

    At the last two jobs, I did what you hold so highly. I turned in my resignation. In both cases the response from HR was,"We're sorry. We cannot accept your resignation. Instead we're going to fire you." Now, what can you do? If you're walking away from what was obviously a bad job, you don't have tens of thousands of dollars saved up, and lawyers, frankly, do not give a shit. The HR department can write up all of the papers that it needs, literally fabricate them out of thin air, to make a case that they terminated with cause. Try claiming unemployment? Denied. Why? "Denied due to termination." But I wasn't terminated. I resigned. "Sorry, that's not what the company reports."

    You're trying to make your points as if there's some sort of rules of honesty, fairness, and justice that a company is required to follow. They're not, and when they want to screw you over, they can. If you happen to be the sort of person who is socially well-connected or has a measure of personal independent wealth they do not screw you over because they know that you can fight back. If, however, you are identified as an easy target without an external support system then you have no chance.

    How naive can you be? What ivory tower do you live in?

    --
    The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
  64. However... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    There's certain contexts that you'll run afoul of other laws...

    For example, if you put an onerous clause(s) in your employment agreement and they say they can't sign it in that form, that they're willing to discuss it and ammend it so it's acceptable to both parties- you can't dismiss for that reason unless there's a good deal of negotiations if you didn't disclose the agreement as part of the offer letter. To do so will be an unfair employment practice per Federal law and you can end up in that sort of lawsuit.

    Another one would be "laying off" someone, citing financial reasons, and they're the only one laid off. Again, that's problematic for the same reasoning.

    Same goes for saying "we no longer need your services", only to hire someone else shortly afterward. If you didn't do anything wrong job performance-wise or didn't do anything insubordinate, you can't just be let go in that manner. The only reasoning you are allowed for this one is if the job posting in question was actually removed- you no longer need their services for what they were doing because you're not doing it anymore.

    Most people don't pursue the last two because it's difficult to prove and doesn't usally get anything useful done- but it DOES get tried from time to time and typically when the employer really screws things up. I know, I've been there...

    This is not to say that you can't fire people for dismissable things- but there's a lot more to employment law, right to work and at-will employment not withstanding. You CAN get into a bind for dismissing people in the wrong way or under the wrong circumstances- but people do it all the time because people don't get the resources at their disposal to pursue the matter in question.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  65. ulteo.org by ycochard · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    As said on ulteo.com, the community is building:
      - http://ulteo.org/

    Yann