Slashdot Mirror


Forbes Says Vista Not People Ready

Diomedes01 writes "Daniel Lyons has an opinion piece up on Forbes.com about a recent press conference held by Microsoft, and the results are anything but flattering."

362 comments

  1. My Clinically Inept Siblings by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Surprise surprise, people are predicting that Microsoft's Vista may not be 'people ready.'

    Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology. Each considers me their personal tech support when anything "breaks." It sucks.

    I've gotten phone calls from them about the behavior of Windows XP on multiple occasions. Once they thought all their windows kept closing if they opened too many. As it turns out, they had the "grouping" feature enabled for windows of the same type on the toolbar.

    *sigh*

    Now Vista will have a new 3D effect to window grouping. Sweet Jesus, I am turning my cell phone off. I can imagine it now, "All my windows are turning sideways! Make it stop!"

    Aside from "Ease of Use," I don't think any of the advertised features are going to meld well with any of my sisters. The new 'Aero' technology is no match for my sisters' Airhead logic.

    I plan to make up some story for them about how Vista is the devil and if you install it, it will slowly begin to ruin your computer. Oh, and if you try to save your biology notes, it especially hates the medical sciences so it will delete them instantly. Not to mention that its new 'AI' abilities allow it to call you names if it perceives you to be an unqualified user. That should stop them from buying it.
    The worst part is that Microsoft can smell this potential market in young people who don't know what they need:
    Microsoft execs also talked about "Impacting People," then they dragged out fashion designer Tommy Hilfiger, who seemed very "impacted" as he sang praise for Microsoft programs. Actually, he was reading meaningless statements from a TelePrompTer. Here is one of his quotes, verbatim: "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination."
    That's exactly the kind of publicity stunt that would cause all three of my sisters to run out and buy Vista. *shudders* He's an fucking fashion designer! What the fuck would he know about computer software?!?!

    And what is with this part of the article:
    Why not at least switch to an Apple Computer (nasdaq: AAPL) Mac? Apple's new operating system is stable, reliable and easy to use. The applications are simple, gorgeous and work well together. And they're here. Today. Steve Jobs must be waking up a happy man this morning.
    This article brought to you by Forbes Magazine's Daniel Lyons, owner of stock in AAPL.

    Thanks, Dan, I was with you there until that last paragraph where your Apple sales pitch kicked in.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
      He's an fucking fashion designer! What the fuck would he know about computer software?!?!
      He knows that if you suck up to its manufacturer, and let them use you as their publicity bitch, you'll get a serious discount.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by cagle_.25 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology. Each considers me their personal tech support when anything "breaks." It sucks.

      Yeah, but when you have questions about reproductive activities, you've got instant tech support...

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    3. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have thought that the proposal before that of using Linux and OpenOffice in the paragraphs before that was far more troubling. I can imagine that it'd be a combination worse than Windows and Office to support friends and family with.

    4. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by include($dysmas) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      even if he is an AAPL shareholder or whatever, it is a a pleasant change to read an anti-MS article that is ;

      a) Well written, punctuation & all
      b) Focussed, on something!.

      remember the OSX vs Ubuntu vs XP thing from a few days ago? this kind of article is diametrically opposite that one (in terms of readability) on the piss pot that is tour wonderful internet.

      /boredom & apologies for spelling

    5. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Why not at least switch to an Apple Computer (nasdaq: AAPL) Mac? Apple's new operating system is stable, reliable and easy to use. The applications are simple, gorgeous and work well together. And they're here. Today. Steve Jobs must be waking up a happy man this morning.

      "Thanks, Dan, I was with you there until that last paragraph where your Apple sales pitch kicked in.

      Well?? Why not?

      I own AAPL as well, but I don't expect the stock price to rise by telling my friends and family to use macs. I expect the stock price to rise because Apple has something really good going here.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    6. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yeah, but when you have questions about reproductive activities, you've got instant tech support...
      They're my sisters. I don't talk about reproductive activities with my sisters.

      Wait a minute, are you from West Virginia?
      --
      My work here is dung.
    7. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by harrkev · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huh? Tommy needs discounts from Sewing machine companies, not Microsoft. I must admit to ignorance about the fashion industry, but even if Microsoft GAVE Hillfigger free computers AND applications, how much would he save, $10,000? I doubt that he uses CAD software to design the next T-shirt.

      There has got to me more to it than that.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    8. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by avdp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's usually considered to be a conflict of interest. That's fine for you to do it, but generally journalist (in as much as this guy is a journalist at all, he mostly writes trash for Forbes) are supposed to refrain from it. Not required by law I don't think, just an ethical/professional thing.

    9. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bill? Is that you?

      PS. Looks like you blew it this time...

    10. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by buro9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am actually doing very much the same... abandoning support for MS crapware to all family members and friends.

      The reason will be simple: I don't use Vista, and I have no idea how to solve whatever problem you're experiencing.

      You see, I'm moving to Ubuntu or Mepis (I still have a whole year or two to make my mind up! Maybe something new will come along) once Windows XP looks like it's drawing close to it's death.

      I look at Ubuntu bi-monthly now, and I like what I see. Is it yet at the point where I want to make it my primary system? Nope... I'm day to day Windows still. But each time I look, more of those nagging doubts have evaporated, more of those features and usability tweaks I want have appeared.

      By the time I have to face the question of what my next operating system will be, it will no longer be a single answer (whatever the next M$ system is), it will be a choice between a Linux (Ubuntu or Mepis are most likely), and Vista. And given the way that those answers are evolving (hey, Linux need do nothing so long as DRM crapware infests Vista!)... it looks like Linux is going to win hands down.

      And in switching... I get to abandon all technical support to anyone on Windows, and let them know that if they want to use Linux, I'll happily help them with whatever problems they have, as I will be in a place to be able to help them.

    11. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Daniel Lyons, owner of stock in AAPL.

      You say this as if it invalidates his criticism of microsoft. Maybe he's just investing according to his impressions.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Elladan · · Score: 1

      Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology. Each considers me their personal tech support when anything "breaks." It sucks.

      So how much are you charging them to subsidize their Microsoft addiction? Might I suggest $20/hour?

      Remember, just because you're their personal tech support doesn't mean you have to be their free tech support!
    13. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by solarbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Prehaps its following that old *NIX joke.

      "UNIX is user-friendly, its just picky about who its friends are"

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    14. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy just say
      "I help you if you will install on your computer, otherwise no support from me"

      It works pretty well... so far i have converted 10+ people to Debian Linux with KDE.

      The biggest failure was my sister who switched back to windows but now askes other people for help.

    15. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by 'nother+poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He doesn't need discounts on sewing machines. The companies that he contracts with to produce a half a mil of his latest fashion obscenity needs the discount on sewing machines. Tommy needs discounts on computers and software because his company neeeds to integrate with and coordinate with all of those other companies in their supply chain. Tommy needs to be able to send the numbers to his accountants firms. Tommy needs computers to work with his ad agency so he can convince even more sheeple to buy his stuff. I'm betting that, just like every other "idea" company in the U.S., Tommy has multiple hundreds of thousands tied up in hardware and licenses for software.

    16. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That doesn't work on my Mom, "Ok, you pay me back for those four years of college I sent you to for your Computer Science degree first!"

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    17. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Nimey · · Score: 1

      "$STANDARD_BEHAVIOR sucks. Make it stop!".
      "That's how it is. You're just going to have to deal with it."

      Take it from me. If you don't coddle your relatives, they'll learn.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    18. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Elvis+Parsley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, he's a fashion designer, but his business has the same IT needs as every other business. They do sales and marketing, buy from suppliers, sell to distributors and retailers, hire and pay employees and provide them with benefits, coordinate and pay for travel, and so on. In the modern business climate, he still needs computers for all of that, even if the activity underlying it all involves ultimately swaning about with charchoal sketches and fabric swatches.

    19. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by drauh · · Score: 1

      so, you agree with the points raised in the article. and then when the author suggests the only other consumer OS available, you say that discounts everything he argued and that you agreed with. so, what was your point?

      you want your sisters to run linux? you think windows is bad? you should live with kde for a few days.

      --
      This is a tautology.
    20. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by nstlgc · · Score: 1
      Now Vista will have a new 3D effect [microsoft.com] to window grouping. Sweet Jesus, I am turning my cell phone off. I can imagine it now, "All my windows are turning sideways! Make it stop!"
      3D effect to window grouping? Try again. That's the 3D version of ALT-TAB, and it can be switched off without a problem.
      --
      I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
    21. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by gowen · · Score: 1
      Tommy needs discounts from Sewing machine companies
      No he doesn't. Most Hilfiger garments are made in sweatshops, and so really don't cost very much. Although, the fact the people making the clothes are earning a pittance does make the mark-up even more obscene. It's also ironic, given Bill Gates genuine concern about third world poverty.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    22. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      You missed the best part of the Tommy quote, the author's sarcasm- From TFA:
      Microsoft execs also talked about "Impacting People," then they dragged out fashion designer Tommy Hilfiger, who seemed very "impacted" as he sang praise for Microsoft programs. Actually, he was reading meaningless statements from a TelePrompTer. Here is one of his quotes, verbatim: "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination." Think about that. Just let it sink in for a minute.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    23. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      And billion dollar companies don't have any office work right?

      I work in a design firm and we have exactly the number of macs as we have designers... 5. The company has 30 employees. The other 25 run Windows, mostly cause cheap hardware is fine for accounting and sales staff => gets the job done... also we find out if a web design is IE compatible right away...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    24. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology. Each considers me their personal tech support when anything "breaks." It sucks.

      Quit your complaining. My grandparents had 14 children, I've got about twenty cousins, two siblings, and ties with the extended families of my parents friends, and I am the only geek ever produced by this warren!

      Sometimes, I seriously consider setting up some kind of VNC.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    25. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that the only thing the Hilfiger brand needs to worry about is having computers that are fast enough to email their sweatshops in Asia. Sewing machines are already owned; you just need to pay a few cents to each "worker." They've already got that discount. Only thing left is to make sure they get cheap tech to manage it all from their comfy US offices.

    26. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by rk · · Score: 1

      Stuff like that makes me glad that I paid for most of my own college education.

      I still help the parents when I can, though, but I have a Mac at work, and run Linux at home, and unless my dad asks me for help on how to best defend against a Zergling rush, I'm not much use to him on Winders.

    27. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by lintux · · Score: 1

      Sounds effective. Although I think it'll be quite a support hell if someone magically succeeds in getting a semi-working installation. ;-)

    28. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't know where you're from, but it's not considered "right" to charge siblings for something like that in most parts. If you can help a sibling with nothing invested but your time, then you do so. Eventually, they'll do the same.

      My brother and sister are also computer inept, and I end up spending ungodly ammounts removing spyware and such from their systems (most of the time if it's a hardware failure I'll even buy the parts they need without asking from compensation). I wouldn't dream of charging them. In the same light however, I recently had a lot of water damage in my home, and my brother (being a construction worker) came by and helping patch it up without asking for anything in return.

      Now for non-immediate family members, I have issued a cease and desist on asking for computer help. I don't care if you'll pay me; I've got a job already and don't need any extra work.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    29. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      My thinking exactly. Making the windows 'sexy' is a geeks thing. It won't help the public one damn bit. If anything, with WILL MAKE THINGS WORSE AND EVEN UNUSABLE. I am scarfing up all of the XP licenses I can find so that I can keep my people working for at lease 4 years after Vista is released. I want no part of it.

      Vista is like Visa. In the long run you will be further in debt and miserable about it.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    30. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by bonius_rex · · Score: 5, Informative
      I doubt that he uses CAD software to design the next T-shirt.

      I sysadmin for a company that does some fashion design. We do indeed use a specialized CAD type program for this. It's output is bascally a blueprint of the garment to give to the manufacturers.

      This software is hella expensive.

    31. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      In fact, nowadays sewing patterns are created with specialist CAD software, with the resulting files directly fed to the manufacturing machines. I don't know about Hilfinger, but, e.g., a suit can get pretty complex by itself, and if you factor different sizes, etc., you can imagine that much complexity can be reduced this way.
      Examples: this, this, and this

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    32. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by thisislee · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that 3d effect is for alt-tab and not grouped windows. Your sisters probably would never see it because they probably don't know many keyboard shortcuts.

      Just because people won't instantly adjust doesn't make something necessarily less usable, just different. There are some features(like that 3d effect although a 2d version like in one of the powertoys would be as good) that migth confuse people at first but help them use the OS. Your sisters would probably have as much trouble switching to OSX or some Linux.

      I haven't used Vista so I can't really say if it is more usable, but things like grouped windows(like in XP) and previews of windows in alt-tab sound like things that would help me use the OS.

    33. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by tomcres · · Score: 0, Troll
      "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination."

      Dubya is amazing. Not only can he run America, export democracy to the whole world, and win elections, but he even finds time to moonlight as a Microsoft marketing writer. Wow!

      Why do you people continue to misunderestimate the man! He's phenomenal!

    34. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by sootman · · Score: 1

      Whether you think he's shilling or not, he's got a point. Read through that features page you linked to. Quick Search looks a whole lot like Spotlight (other than it's in the bottom left, not the top right); it has a Spotlight-like text box in the control panel (practically the first thing Jobs showed off @ the 2004 WWDC keynote) that looks just like OS X's;* and Flip 3D looks pretty but in practice is probably *less* easy-to-use than Expose. He may be a shill, but facts are facts. Like a man once said, if Hitler says 2+2=4, you can't argue with him.

      * I mean, really: compare http://www.holycola.net/searchprefs.jpg and http://www.microsoft.com/library/media/1033/window svista/images/features/feat_UX_03.jpg

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    35. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      If you had read the link they are revering to hillfigures attempt getting a website up so he can sell his clothes directly. Apparently he wasted a year with some obviously very bad techs trying to make it work in linux. Microsoft swooshed (is that a word??) in and got him going in short order.. Reallly?? A professional team can get a website up in a just a few months. Someone really needs to bitchslap whoever hired idiots who couldn't get a website up in a years time on Linux.

    36. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by localman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ethical/professional journalism?!? Ha ha ha. i should mod you "funny".

      Cheers.

    37. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "That doesn't work on my Mom, "Ok, you pay me back for those four years of college I sent you to for your Computer Science degree first!""

      That's when I have her move my barbells up to the attic....

      ---with apologies to Steve Martin

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    38. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by ender- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sometimes, I seriously consider setting up some kind of VNC.

      What's stopping you? I set up VNC on my parent's computer, and set them up with a dynamic dns so that I wouldn't even have to have them tell me their IP address. Works like a charm, and I can just get on a fix it in minutes instead of spending hours trying to walk them through it.

      Although sometimes I just tell them "Christ mom, you've had this computer for 5 years. You've been using it to send emails for that entire time. Why haven't you learned to attach a file to an email yet. I KNOW you've sent out attachments before."

      Argh! But the next time they buy a computer I'm telling them that if they get a Windows computer I will not provide any support for them. I will provide limited support if they get a Mac or Linux system. I'm sick of spending 2-3 hours cleaning up spyware, viruses and destabilizing utilities every time I visit them.

    39. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

      That was part of the joke ...

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    40. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by giffnyc · · Score: 1

      $10K? It's a testament to their brand marketing team that you think "Tommy Hilfiger" is some guy in a loft on 7th Avenue in New York cutting out T-Shirt prototypes.

      From their corporate website http://investor.tommy.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=98332&p= irol-fundIncomeA
      you can see the company brought in 1,780.77 million in revenue in their past fiscal year. They went through the process of bringing up a brand new online retail system, as well as improving their global supply chain systems, which is where a company like this can really save money.

      I don't care for Windows servers (I'm a BSD fan myself), and I'm suspicious of global garment manufacturers labor issues, but all the same, he's a terrific spokesman choice for M$. A creative brand with a high tech profit center that spends tens of millions on improving its IT and had issues with their attempt to use FOSS. Use CAD to design the next T-Shirt? How else do you suppose you produce 6 million T-shirts in a range of colors and sizes utilizing JIT practices?

      Companies with $10,000 IT budgets aren't known around the globe, and shipping product to every mall you've ever been to. You need to get a sense of corporate size and the fiscal power that they wield. You're clearly understimating the danger.

    41. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      I have done precisely that. I'm the youngest of nine, and typically the first call for tech support (although there's at least one other equally-competent if not more qualified geek in the family). I have now made it a mandatory condition of my help. I help them set up their router to allow VNC in, help them install VNC(but not as a service!). Now when I help them, it takes 30 seconds instead of 30 minutes, because I can see exactly what's going wrong.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    42. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      And I guess it's not made by Microsoft.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    43. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Funny

      A design firm where only 17% of the employees are designers? Maybe if the others had Macs they'd get more work done and you wouldn't need such a bloated payroll.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    44. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by burninator · · Score: 0

      Heres a thought: Make them buy Macs.. They are nice, friendly and easy to use... not to mention pretty (easy to sell to chicks) :)

    45. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not required by law I don't think, just an ethical/professional thing.

      Ethical considerations require that he discloses that he's an apple shareholder, which he has.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    46. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      It's usually considered to be a conflict of interest. That's fine for you to do it, but generally journalist (in as much as this guy is a journalist at all, he mostly writes trash for Forbes) are supposed to refrain from it. Not required by law I don't think, just an ethical/professional thing. What is this 'ethical/professional' thing you say journalists should have? Do our biggest advertisers demand it?

      Sincerely,
      Dan Rather, Steve Hall, Jayson Blair, and all the business journalists that Enron hired.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    47. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

      I'm an internal coder for an (unnamed) apparel company in the US, so yes, computers are very helpful.

      Note: Thankfully, soon we'll be on Linux. (we're on Solaris, now, developing on WinXP. the conversion's coming soon)

      --
      I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
    48. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

      My father-in-law's an independant wetlands biologist. Don't think I'm going to be getting him to work for me like that anytime soon :)

      (on the plus side, my mother-in-law does our taxes, free of charge.)

      --
      I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
    49. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by richlv · · Score: 1

      just a question - why have you been supporting their windows machines so far ? just tell them to call microsoft. or set up anything else for them and support that only.
      works perfectly for me :)

      --
      Rich
    50. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      you will have lots of fun giving tech support for your family when they all switch to some kind of linux :p

      --
      IAAL
    51. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reproductive support? This is /.

      All the support he needs is his palm. Fap fap fap anyone?

    52. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by caluml · · Score: 1
      Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology.

      That's not very fault tolerant. You should have a doctor, and a lawyer in the family before you can even start thinking about some crazy careers like biology.

    53. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Said the same for Windows XP. I think I needed to print a shirt to make it clear though.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    54. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I have to say it, your analogy falls down in a few ways.

      First I'd like to ask you, how often have you had water damage or other things that a contractor could help out with? And how long did it take to fix these problems? Now, apply that question to how much computer work you did.

      Then, consider how you've been asked for help. Was it expected that you'd do computer work and was it expected that your water damage would be fixed? Or, was it asked as if the possible answer might be no?

      In the case of computer help, most people demand help from the "techie" family member. That is why nerds are reluctant to help family members.

      --
      I don't get it.
    55. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously: get them Cheap-O-Macs... iBooks, MacMinis. Maybe a 100% watertight Consumer-Easy-Linux-Install would be even harder to break, but that would require you to do quite some work. My suggestion: Set them up with Mac-Boxen... watch them set the bloody things up themselves (*), lean back and wait for what malfeasance might (will? someday?) come - and deal with it when it comes, not beforehand ('cause it's already there, waiting for preying on your relatives data).

      a.c.


      (*) Yes, you will have to watch/guide them during install/setup -- even Apples install-/config-process isn't perfect (who'da thunk!?) --- but (and this is strictly anecdotal evidence from watching 4 total switchers (Win to Mac) and two half-switchers (MacOS9 to MacOSX)): You'll likely be surprised how fast they pick up the basics. And how many things they'll have accomplished on their own 'till your next visit. And how few things they'll have b0rked.

      P.S.: I know... I sound like an insufferable Apple-Fanboi (even though I work about half/half MacOS and Win (NT/2000 an XP) (Video-Editing)) ... however there is a reason to this: I've always liked the Mac OS -- even in it's dark days -- and had a lot of problems with that "newfangled" Mac OS X myself. But watching my 65-year old mother (who always had problems with computers, first Win 3.1, then Mac OS 8/9) take to Mac OS X (and the iApps (iPhoto etc.)) like a duck to water... that was something of an eye-opener.

      --
      sig? Oh, that sig...
    56. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It's not Tommy that needs a discount on anything, it's the rest of the overconsuming world that needs discounts on group therapy. There are few things that irritate me more than wearing a trademark. I don't want his stinking red and white pattern any more than I'd want the Nike swoosh on my left butt cheek. This trend of "belonging" to a pretentious clothing brand is ridiculous. We're supposed to praise QUALITY products that satisfy our needs at the prices we can afford. Some people drive a Ford because they like the handling and cheap maintenance costs, some people drive a Toyota because they like the reliability and simplicity. I don't see any Tommy fashionistas praising the durability of the product or its stain-resistance.

      Why does the world like Microsoft ? We don't NOT like them apparently, since they dominate the market for desktop OS. Is it because their product offers better value at a competitive price ? Is it because they provide must-have features that others do not ? Or is it just because everyone else is using it ?

      The disturbing trend is that more and more companies are trying to market a vision or style rather than a product. Microsoft may have done some good things with Vista, but they're not selling us just another operating system. It's more like a designer ensemble.. first you get Vista, then you get the matching Office suite, and whatever else they feel like introducing. They want to create computer fashion hounds out of us all, where it's less of a "what do I need" attitude and more of a "I want the matching green speakers to go with my desktop theme". Tommy and Microsoft have more in common than we'd like to admit.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    57. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      Fixing a computer is a hell of a lot easier than fixing water damage. I've done both, and one trip to fix up some water damage and do a good job, is easily worth 10 to 20 "tech support calls".

      I'd take that kind of trade any day, and I hate doing tech support on anyone's computer, free or otherwise.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    58. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Shuh · · Score: 1
      eldavojohn did say:
      Now Vista will have a new 3D effect to window grouping. Sweet Jesus, I am turning my cell phone off. I can imagine it now, "All my windows are turning sideways! Make it stop!"

      Don't worry about your cell phone. By the time Vista comes out, if it comes out, you will be getting mental vibrations from them through the psychic plane. That's how all transcendent beings will communicate once they've evolved into pure energy. Of course if your sisters are still using Windows by then, perhaps you better keep the phone.

    59. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      And I guess it's not made by Microsoft.

      No, it's not. I was just making the point that there is expensive software involved in design, contrary to the comment I was replying to.

    60. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by probbka · · Score: 1

      Remember, just because you're their personal tech support doesn't mean you have to be their free tech support!

      And just because you happen to be a human being doesn't mean you have to act like one!

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    61. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by avdp · · Score: 1

      It depends on your level of "ethical-ness" I guess. Some do consider disclosure good enough.

    62. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you will have lots of fun giving tech support for your family when they all switch to some kind of linux :p

      Holy crap I wish my mom WOULD switch to Linux! Lots of fun? Yes, I ssh in, see what the problem is, fix it. All during a three minute commercial break. Try that with Windows.

      It is MUCH easier to fix someone's problem than it is to walk them through and help them fix it themselves over the phone. WAY EASIER AND FASTER.

      Desktop frozen? SSH in, kill -9 , "Ok mom, type startx and press enter". I already have a script that "knocks" on my dns server and they autoupdate so I just use the FQDN to log into any of my computers by NAME. Piece of cake, even for a non-guru like me.

      Assuming you are a Windows power user kinda person, if you knew as much about Linux as you did Windows, you would prefer fixing Linux because it is easier, faster and better documented. And yes, it really is needed much less often.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    63. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      What amazes me about this article is that it comes from DANIEL LYONS!

      This guy HATES LINUX and ANYTHING to do with OSS! He's written a ton of hatchet jobs on OSS and Linux in Forbes for years. Yet he actually says in this article that he doesn't understand why more people aren't using Linux on the desktop compared to waiting for Microsoft's flood of complicated crap!

      And he hits the nail on the head every time - pointing out the absurd complexity of current Windows menus and dialogs, the pointlessness of the "featuritis", the meaninglessness of the slogans, the crass hucksterism - and worse, the fact that they would do this just before announcing yet another delay in an OS that was supposed to be out THREE YEARS AGO!

      I was floored! Was somebody using Lyons name but it's actually ghostwritten by somebody else - like Linus, maybe?

      If this is what a Microsoft shill like Daniel Lyons thinks about Vista, Microsoft is in DEEP SHIT!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    64. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if it doesn't always work out that you get an even ammount of help back. It's family, not some business with quarterly earnings estimates. You don't help them because they'll help you later, you help them because they're your family. If they ever get a chance to do the same then it's just a nice thing. Like I said, I've already told everyone outside of my parents and siblings that I'd prefer to not do any computer work even when compensated, so I certainly am not doing the work with the expectation of getting something back.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    65. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Of course you expect something back, I do, everyone does. It's called "thank you" and I know a lot of people whose family members don't even give that, mine included.

      I'm sorry I didn't make that more obvious.

      --
      I don't get it.
    66. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      AH, but you see we pulled in 3 million last year and plan to do about 12 this year.... sales people who do their jobs well really do bring the jobs in.

      also.. I don't want to deal with ignorant clients all day... that's what the Account managers are for, basically public relations...

      I get paid very well to just focus on design and interactive all day.

      Sure less people on payroll would mean more for each but we'd be struggling in a crappy little industrial office space instead of working in a nice 4rth floor suite in a well maintained office building... just so we could work on small projects for small clients, instead of working on 200k projects for much more organized and professional businesses.

      All depends on what you want out of life I suppose.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    67. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by Squirrelgirl · · Score: 1

      As a chick who use Macs, I... guess I have to agree.

      That said. Computers are a tool. While its honourable to want to help his sisters, it does not kill anyone to learn how to use a tool.

      Sure, they don't want to be computer geeks or wizes, but I bet they have received education and training in some way on the other biological equipment they use. A computer is one of all their tools they want to use, and learning the basics of it can't hurt them at all.

      The problem isn't I think that they are airheads (its not comforting to think of an airhead biologist), but rather that their brother has become convenient for them.

    68. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      I've often thought that my Mom could get everything she needed done with an Unbuntu live CD, but she'd never go for it.

      She also tends to be incredulous when I tell her I don't know something, "Then what did I send you to school for?!?"

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    69. Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  2. Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Vista not People Ready

    But, but, but... "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination." Fashion designer (and part time Microsoft shill) Tommy Hilfiger said so! So it MUST be true! Vista is the future! Viva la Vista!

    Seriously, though. A voice command from your cellphone to check email? What are these guys smoking?

    1. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination."

      As SciFi has clearly pointed out, this is not a good idea...

    2. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by blackbeaktux · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean i can seamlessly receive an urgent request for a business relationship from a top Nigerian official just by saying "Clippy, fetch my email?" Say no more, my friend.

      I'm sure this is the feature i need to push me over the edge to upgrade my O'97. /sarcasm.

    3. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by sreekotay · · Score: 1

      Funny... I don't think they're even trying to target people.
      --
      graphicallyspeaking

    4. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      I dunno, Seven of Nine seemed to power up quite a few people without much trouble.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    5. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by dc29A · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though. A voice command from your cellphone to check email? What are these guys smoking?

      The new Microsoft "killer" application/appliance/gadget: the Blackberry killer.

    6. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one pronounce V z I y A t G q R n A?

    7. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If combinations of people and technology all end up looking like seven of nine, let me be the first to say I welcome our new borg overladies.

    8. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I believe the fine folks at http://www.fuckingmachines.com/ would politely disagree with SciFi

    9. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by frission · · Score: 1

      "What is your password?"
      "Big Boy"
      "Please repeat."
      "Big Boy!!"

    10. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Going to multiple monitors will be the thing that pushes you away from orifice '97. Try it and see. I love it when even Microsoft can't properly use their own APIs... other [older] software works just fine.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

      No, it's not the future.

      He said technology.

    12. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Seriously, though. A voice command from your cellphone to check email? What are these guys smoking?
      The sad part is, it really doesn't matter when Vista is delivered or how pointless the features are.

      I used to say that Microsoft was so entrenched, the whole company could go on vacation for 3 years and still make windfall profits every year. And now, that's exactly what has happened (except they squandered those years working instead of partying). As far as I know, none of the Microsoft software on my computer is less than 3 years old (except for patches), yet the company where I work still pays Microsoft every year. Nobody cares, because a few hundred bucks per user every few years isn't much, and switching everything over to another platform is inconceivable, regardless of whether it's better and/or cheaper.

      This may be the weakest position Microsoft's desktop business will ever be in, but do you see Apple or Linux storming the gates? I don't. MSFT stock plummeting? Nope. Microsoft is really in the perfect business, it's like a movie people will pay to see over and over, forever.

    13. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by nephridium · · Score: 1
      Viva la Vista!

      More like "Hasta la vista!" - I'm still wondering how they came up with THAT name; maybe they'll have that message pop up, replacing the infamous BSODs, before rebooting.

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    14. Re:Not Ready? Say it ain't so! by dogfriend · · Score: 1

      So sad, but very true.

  3. Rejection by kc0re · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People reject OpenOffice and reject even Mac, because they don't know any different. They have been "programmed" to use Microsoft Windows, therefore, until they are told different, they will continue to use Microsoft Windows.

    We can sit around all we want and say stuff like "when people get tired of (malware|viruses|spyware|whateverelse)" they will switch to (Linux|Mac).

    It's just not true. People will switch when they are told to. Nothing else. Until Companies FORCE people to switch, there will be no switching.

    1. Re:Rejection by Cyphertube · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course, if things are half as complex as this article makes it sound, well, I think there will be the issue of training budgets for companies.

      If the new Office/Vista interfaces are too different from the current Windows setup, the training budget will be cheaper to go to a Linux desktop (GNOME or KDE) and use OpenOffice.org. Never mind the license fees to upgrade being saved.

      This has become typical of Microsoft. While SQL has gotten better, and they're getting better with Visual Studio and the new version of IE, so many other things are broken. I can't speak for BizTalk 2006, but 2004 has struck me as a huge waste of cash.

      I've been trying to justify using MS products for quite some time (aside from the fact that .NET programmers are cheap). If the user interface is more complex for most of our users, then there will be little to no reason to stick with it.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    2. Re:Rejection by benzapp · · Score: 1, Troll

      No, people reject open office because it is a useless, steaming piece of shit. If you are a student writing 20 page "research" papers then it's quite sufficient.

      If you are producing large professional documents with tons of linked fields and complex spreadsheet analyses, Open Office is absolutely useless.

      MS Office WORKS and it works well. I personally produce over $500,000 worth of professional documents every year. They could charge $2000 for office and I would still buy it, it is peanuts compared to the value of what I produce annually.

      You clearly do not live in the real world.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:Rejection by Moby+Cock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think articles like this one may also help. It is scathing. Seldom have I seen such a brutal assault on Microsoft in a mainstream publication. If a similar rebuke was aired on CNN or 60 minutes ran a piece that tore apart the hype for Vista I think there would be an effect.

      I think you are right that most folks use Microsoft because they simply have no idea that it is bad software. To them its just the way things are and they get on with whatever they are doing. The Linux FUD is going to be around for a long time still and more articles like this one are needed.

    4. Re:Rejection by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bah, what you talk about could be replaced with a shell script and LaTeX ... ... Just to let you know...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      500,000 dollars worth of documents a year? You keep track of how much your documents cost? Get A LIFE! (I'm just kidding)

    6. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could also be replaced with a hex editor? What the fuck's your point? Just because you can do something one way doesn't mean you should. Use whatever saves you the most time.

    7. Re:Rejection by timster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I think the GP does indeed live in the real world, just not the same one as you.

      Ballmer gave what I thought was an interesting answer when Forbes asked whether people will actually be able to use the complex new applications. He said that most people won't, but that some people (like yourself) will be able to do things with them that increase everyone's productivity.

      I can see the theory he's using, but I'm afraid where Microsoft has always failed is in addressing the majority of users who need too much of their attention for other things to learn the intricacies of Microsoft applications. I worry that Microsoft has turned office computing into a difficult video game, where some people will get very high scores but some people just want to write memos.

      The serious problem with this is that a difficult application creates a lot of frustration. Microsoft seems to ignore this emotional angle, and creates applications that are very capable but which most people are honestly afraid of. This ends up reducing their productivity and eliminating their willingness to explore the rich functionality.

      If we want the masses to do interesting, complex things with their documents, we need to carefully consider this emotional aspect. Not that OpenOffice does, of course, but Microsoft's new versions won't be popular if they don't make software that people actually like to use.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    8. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad you got that off your chest, now what the fuck has it to do with the Forbes article? I swear, when the topic is Microsoft some of you go off like a script.

    9. Re:Rejection by Seta · · Score: 1

      First off, please stop being such a jerk, we didn't ask for it, we didn't curse at you, and frankly I don't care for your attitude. Secondly, his response was a jest in response to your flame of open office. Do us all a favor, please don't post further until you get some anger management because flames are about as interesting to read as cereal boxes, and last I checked, cursing isn't a "cool thing".

    10. Re:Rejection by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      I reject Mac because *gasp* I don't like it.

      I love OOo, though. Free, and almost as full-features as MSO without the proprietary formats.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    11. Re:Rejection by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ??? Saves time? LaTeX source is just a text file. You could invent your own tags like

      @SQL QUERY@

      Then write a perl script that parses the text and replaces the text between @@ with the result.

      I do a related trick for my text book where I have @line_number,text@ markups that sync up line numbers in the text with lines in source code. E.g. I can say "The while loop on line @74,while@ performs..." and then it looks around line 74 for the word "while" and replaces the @@ with the actual number.

      This way if I add a comment or whitespace my line numbers still make sense. To make a PDF I type

      make docs ... really hard.

      My point is you don't need to spend two grand on a suite of tools where teTeX and a small perl script accomplishes the same thing. You could edit the LaTeX source with any text editor and view the pdf, ps or dvi output with your fav reader.

      If you're not a programmer hire some intern for a week to script it up for you.

      You look at that and probably say "oh great now I have to invent my own tools!" I say why not? Why is being clever such a bad thing? It means I can use professional tools [hint: LaTeX does typesetting not just whatever Word feels like] and accomplish my goals in an efficient manner. Instead of being totally dependent on MSFT to come in and solve my problems [with the added bonus of vendor lockin, security holes your parents would be ashamed of and a price tag that is absurd].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:Rejection by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      While SQL has gotten better

      I hope you aren't speaking about MS Sequel sewer here... Visiting a Sequel Sewer backed website very often is like looking from a sewer up through the bowl, if you see what I mean...

      Security holes big enough to ram a tree-stump through...

    13. Re:Rejection by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny
      I personally produce over $500,000 worth of professional documents every year.

      I used to use Photoshop to produce $500,000,000 worth of profesionnal-quality documents every months. But then, they introcued some annoying security feature, and I had to switch to the gimp!

      They could charge $2000 for office and I would still buy it,

      Careful there. They won't accept "documents" produced by Office as payment for the software itself. That would be too easy...

    14. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod it up. People are apprently failing to see the humor in this. Genious. Pure Genious.

    15. Re:Rejection by SpinyNorman · · Score: 3, Informative

      But for every one of you using every feature of Microsoft office, there are 10's of thousands of users who don't even use 10% of the features and are only using MS Office because it's what's installed on their computer and/or what they know from work.

      Most people don't even know what the features of MS office are, let alone prefer it because of them. They use it out of sheer inertia.

    16. Re:Rejection by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      I used to use Photoshop to produce $500,000,000 worth of profesionnal-quality documents every months. But then, they introcued some annoying security feature [slashdot.org], and I had to switch to the gimp!

      What is your output medium? I find the Gimp lacking in way too many features. Everything from Luminosity Layering to CMYK to the "Healing Brush" to good support for color profiles, etc etc etc.

    17. Re:Rejection by ben+there... · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you are producing large professional documents with tons of linked fields and complex spreadsheet analyses, Open Office is absolutely useless.

      MS Office WORKS and it works well. I personally produce over $500,000 worth of professional documents every year. They could charge $2000 for office and I would still buy it, it is peanuts compared to the value of what I produce annually.

      In my experience, businesses that produce "large professional documents with tons of linked fields and complex spreadsheet analyses" have a fairly low CMM.

      I would suggest analyzing your processes and focusing on databases so your company doesn't have to pay $70,000+ /year for somebody to move fields around in Excel.

      You almost certainly don't *need* Word for anything. On the other hand, you probably do need Excel for *some* ad hoc analysis and PowerPoint for presentations.

    18. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      500 million, huh?

      So you used Photoshop for 6 billion dollars worth of work per year, and you changed because of a security model?

      Each hour you spent converting cost you $700k.

    19. Re:Rejection by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can see the theory he's using, but I'm afraid where Microsoft has always failed is in addressing the majority of users who need too much of their attention for other things to learn the intricacies of Microsoft applications.

      [X] Strongly Disagree

      Software is complex. Nothing will change that. Microsoft's failing has generally been that they don't support the power user. For example, search and replace functions are cool, but I want regexp! I want to be able to use either the existing feature or a regexp, in fact. Given that the author of the article was bitching about endless numbers of options, it sounds to me like Microsoft is trying to fix that problem, because they know that if all the nerds eschew windows, eventually everyone will, because there will be no one to help them unfuck it when it's broken.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MS Office WORKS and it works well. I personally produce over $500,000 worth of professional documents every year."

      No doubt MS Office works. So what did people like you do before 1996? I'm sure those systems still work fine today too.

    21. Re:Rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooooshshsh!

    22. Re:Rejection by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      Read the link--this was a joke. (Hint: Adobe added banknote image detection, blocking.) I agree with you about the Gimp, though. For instance, LAB support is there, but it sucks (no preview), and I use LAB a lot. I would love to run Photoshop on Linux, but I don't see it happening.

    23. Re:Rejection by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      What is your output medium?

      Output medium? I personally output my "documents" on Louisenthal paper. This makes for very convincing "documents", but unfortunately, it is sometimes somewhat difficult to obtain.

      I find the Gimp lacking in way too many features.

      Talk for yourself. Hint: it's not the gimp that's lacking...

      Everything from Luminosity Layering to CMYK to the "Healing Brush" to good support for color profiles, etc etc etc.

      Actually, I don't bother with these, but rather stuff the finished "documents" in a pillow, then knead the pillow, and the documents come out convincingly wrinkled...

      You know, overly crisp "documents" might arouse suspicion...

    24. Re:Rejection by aevans · · Score: 1

      The thing that Office does, that typical webapps can't is turn those simple memos into a searchable, actionable, versioned database (and make a pretty chart out of it all.) That's what he's talking about a few power user making everyone else more productive. Sun Star Division Open Office can do a decent job of formatting documents, but it doesn't have the scriptability and collaboration that Office has. They have successfully cloned the unusability, but not the real features. Office is slowly rebuilding itself into a competitor with the web. And when you place a few Ajax widgets against that, you're going to lose. Word and Excel are the next level of rich internet applications. Too bad they have the baggage of all the other Microsoft Server crap that you have to work with.

    25. Re:Rejection by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      If you're already using LaTeX there really shouldn't be any need to use perl to mess things around unless you are generating input from a different source. If you want to have source code listings with line numbers then you ought to try the listings package which allows for all manner of nice features when including source code listing including optionally boxing/framing code listings, support for a large number of programming languages providing automatic syntax highlighting, excellent support for continued listsings, excellent and versatile line numbering support, automated code formatting (define your preferred formatting for C in the header, and then let LaTeX indent and format your source code for you) and all manner of other things including experimental hyperlink support from identifier names. Read or skim through the manual and find yourself immediately downloading the package.

      How to manage referincing line numbers using the usual \label and \ref functionality of LaTeX in on page 51 in case you're curious.

      Jedidiah.

    26. Re:Rejection by Zanth_ · · Score: 1

      Using Code Weaver's Cross Over Office, I have PS 7.0 installed and it works flawlessly. Admittedly, I don't use many extensions and plugins for it but it sure beats using GIMP! COO is cheap for what it can do and the great thing is that one could use MS Office if the so desired, the emulation programme just works.

    27. Re:Rejection by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      You're kidding! I actually run COO. I didn't think they had any version of Photoshop running. Shows what I know.

  4. All empires by dalroth5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...fall.

    --
    "We reject kings, presidents and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code." Dave Clark, IETF
    1. Re:All empires by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 2, Funny
      All empires...fall.

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

  5. Cyborgs...? by drrck · · Score: 4, Funny

    FTA: Microsoft execs also talked about "Impacting People," then they dragged out fashion designer Tommy Hilfiger, who seemed very "impacted" as he sang praise for Microsoft programs ...
    "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination." Think about that. Just let it sink in for a minute.

    I for one welcome our new Vista powered overlords.

    1. Re:Cyborgs...? by notea42 · · Score: 1

      Luckily, with Vista powered overlords, you could probably just keep running until they BSoD and collapse.

    2. Re:Cyborgs...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually would welcome our new Vista-powered overlords. Unlike the Borgs who will just keep going and going, our new overlords will stay on Earth long enough until they need a reboot or catch a virus, whichever comes first. Then we get to keep their spaceships.

  6. trying not to troll by psbrogna · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Delay + Delay + Delay + Bad Review ...

    I hate to add fuel to the fire but these sound like indications of a flawed design & development environment...

    1. Re:trying not to troll by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Delay + Delay + Delay + Bad Review ...

      and the stock price will go up when Vista finally does ship. You wait and see. MSFT has this uncanny ability to defy all logic.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    2. Re:trying not to troll by psbrogna · · Score: 1
      This was the fact: "Delay + Delay + Delay + Bad Review"

      I apologize, I'll try to be more cleare in the future.

    3. Re:trying not to troll by teslar · · Score: 1

      Naw, it's just an indication of an R&D department working 28 hours a day trying to catch up with the promises of the Marketing department.

    4. Re:trying not to troll by aralin · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Up until a year ago it took some three months to actually produce a working build of Windows Vista. Now they managed to pull a miracle and get it down to about a week or so. I work on a similar scale software and we produce working builds every day or two on multiple codelines. If we ever get to third day without a working build on main codeline, the developers scream like mad. If we would get to a week, the development would halt for the sheer number of conflicts from thousands of developers pounding it day and night. If we hit three months, the product would become totally unbuildable and the company would implode in a big puff of smoke, or maybe godzilla would eat us all, I just cannot even imagine that possibility.

      The fact that Microsoft operates under conditions like that is indeed a herculean effort, but such a huge amount of resources is wasted in the process and such amount of overhead generated, that there is no wonder for Vista to be delayed 3 years and its feature list slashed in half and its stability and security (whatever amount there ever been) is going down the drain. I can only imagine that Office is in the same boat.

      This is not merely flawed development environment, this is a sign of total disaster in making.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    5. Re:trying not to troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you get back to working on fixing Vista?

  7. Opinion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when has an Opinion piece become a piece of tech news? Oh right this is Slashdot. As long as the opinion piece is Anti-MS then ya'll can just pat yourselves on the back and bash MS till there is no end in sight and feel good about yourselves.

    1. Re:Opinion? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 4, Funny
      Since when has an Opinion piece become a piece of tech news?

      Don't read many newspapers, or watch much television, do you?

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    2. Re:Opinion? by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

      Well since very few people have seen Vista, I'll take the opinions and the comments.

      You have to admit, the talking cell phone mail retrieval was very lame.

      C'mon... it's talk to your cell phone and download your mail. That's funny! In fact it's better than any joke I've ever heard with the term "banana salesman" as the punch line.

      And Tommy Hilfiger? (However he's spelled)... Sorry I'm not cool enough for this dude and his powerful combinations. When I go to a tech seminar I usually see other engineers and that impresses me. Balmer sweating and Hilfy huffing doesn't get me going.

      I write code. I maintain servers. I know my shit.

      I don't need Barney in my cellphone retrieving my mail for me while a Tickle Me Elmo recites my playlist of MP3s (DRM Enabled) and some lame ass gadget moving my addressbook between 9 other applications.

      For God's sake! I KNOW how to use a computer!

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    3. Re:Opinion? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      When Forbes magazine is criticizing your announcement event and calling your upcoming major product "not people ready," it's indicative of the emergency state that Microsoft finds itself in. That may make the Microsoft fanbois on Slashdot cry, but it's the truth and deserves to be reported.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    4. Re:Opinion? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Did you ever stop, and perhaps let the thought cross your mind, that there might, just might be a good reason why technologically inclined people dislike Microsoft on such a great level?

  8. colleagues by mattoo · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the article:
    ...that lets you see how your colleagues and your colleagues' colleagues rate various Web sites.
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't your colleagues' colleagues by definition also your colleagues?
    1. Re:colleagues by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't your colleagues' colleagues by definition also your colleagues?

      Not necessarily. Suppose that in company Zephyr, Alice works with Bob on project Yeti, and Bob works with Charlie on project Wingnut, but Alice does not work with Charlie on any project. Then Charlie is Alice's colleague's colleague, but not himself Alice's colleague.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:colleagues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't your colleagues' colleagues by definition also your colleagues?
      Yes, unless you have colleagues that work part-time at more than one company.
    3. Re:colleagues by distilledprodigy · · Score: 0

      I know the answer to this one!!! 7!

    4. Re:colleagues by Stoopid-Guy0 · · Score: 0

      Actually a colleague is merely "a fellow member of a profession". Charlie is Alice's colleague.

    5. Re:colleagues by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Nah - it just looks at user's own website ratings and gives them back to the user

      Your colleagues colleague is YOU.

    6. Re:colleagues by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      No - They're you!

      Zen lessons, courtesy of Microsoft

    7. Re:colleagues by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't your colleagues' colleagues by definition also your colleagues?

      By that definition, isn't everyone Kevin Bacon?

    8. Re:colleagues by Edzor · · Score: 1

      I find your use of obfuscation confusing.

  9. Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by tpgp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    After all, he's the author of such 'provocative' articles as Who is Pamela Jones? Linux's Hit Men, Linux? No Thanks. and SCO's 'Smoking Gun'

    He's a troll, and an inconsistent one at that.

    The final paragraph of the linked article
    Why not at least switch to an Apple Computer (nasdaq: AAPL - news - people ) Mac? Apple's new operating system is stable, reliable and easy to use. The applications are simple, gorgeous and work well together. And they're here. Today. Steve Jobs must be waking up a happy man this morning.
    Really explains alot. I presumed this guy (with his anti IBM, Novell & Linux stance) was an MS shill. Turns out he's just another Apple fanboy.
    --
    My pics.
    1. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by MasterC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...he's just another Apple fanboy.

      According to eldavojohn (I don't care enough to verify it) he owns apple stock. So I guess that upgrades him from just fanboy to I-like-my-money-so-I-won't-bash-my-investments fanboy?

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He recommended Apple, AFTER recommending open source alternatives.
      And he was pointing out that Microsoft was bashing IBM, not bashing IBM himself.

      Unless you're refering to other article's he's written, I don't see how he had any "anti IBM, Novell & Linux stance"

    3. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      His article was almost as vapour-filled as the press event he's condemning. He could have just said, "Microsoft held a press non-event, and everyone thought it was boring".

      And I'm pretty sure promoting a company whose stock you hold without giving notice of this fact used to be considered unethical and/or illegal.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by tpgp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to eldavojohn (I don't care enough to verify it)

      Errr, you linked to speculation posted by someone less then 20 minutes ago. I don't believe eldavojohn actually knows whether Lyons owns stock or not.

      --
      My pics.
    5. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Well the fact that he is now trolling the other side says something... it says there are enough people that hate Microsoft to justify a 'flame piece' written just to attract readers.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      He also owns apple stock. Tell me that isn't biased or a conflict of interests.
      Regards,
      Steve

    7. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 1

      All he is doing is writing to maximize the number of hits. And the last bit about Apple probably increased the number of hits by quite a bit.

    8. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by sh00z · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess that upgrades him from just fanboy to I-like-my-money-so-I-won't-bash-my-investments fanboy?
      Even a fanboy should have realized that Apple's stock peak back in January was likely to be the highest it's going to get for a LONG time. There's nothing the press can do at this point that'll pump up Apple's price. The next iPod is going to have to be subcutaneously-implantable nanotech to cause a significant bump. I am an unabashed fanboy, but even I sold (at 21* my 1996 purchase price) in January.
    9. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's absolutely beautiful o' fanboi moderator, ranking the first mention of potential conflict of interest as "Redundant". I'ld point you to a dictionary reference of the term but suspect you wouldn't find it people ready.

      Your slavish adoration of all thing Redmond is showing, as is the sub-80 IQ.

    10. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Sique · · Score: 1

      On the other hand: He puts his money where his mouth is. :)

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    11. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by shmlco · · Score: 1
      "Turns out he's just another Apple fanboy."

      Wow. Being able to instantly slap a label on someone and reduce them down to that label, and only that label, why, it must make your thinking process [sic] highly efficient. And, as you say, really explains a lot...

      ...about your worldview, not his.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    12. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Angostura · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love the way you carefully neglected to quote the preceeding two paragraphs:

      osoft can't afford to screw up like this. There are free alternatives to everything Microsoft sells, like the Linux operating system and the Open Office application suite. Rivals like Novell (nasdaq: NOVL - news - people ), Red Hat (nasdaq: RHAT - news - people ), Sun Microsystems (nasdaq: SUNW - news - people ) and, yes, IBM are pushing those programs big time.

      Given Microsoft's delays I can't believe open-source stuff still hasn't caught on for desktop computers. It's amazing, but people will wait months and months for products that are so complicated that no ordinary person can figure out how to use them.


      Yes, clearly an anti-Linux, anti-IBM shill.

    13. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

      Lyons would flame dead hurricane refugees, who were killed by dead US soldiers, who were also firemen on 9/11 if it got him a headline. In my opinion... :D

    14. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Your probably right. People would read it just so they could scream at him about it. Or they would read it because no one would believe someone was stupid enough to write something like that.

      HOWEVER... Forbes would never run it because it would damage their credibility.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    15. Re:Do we care what Lyons says anymore? by portnoy · · Score: 1

      It might be, if it's true. As far as I can tell, the source for that seems to be "some guy on Slashdot".

  10. wow. by mike518 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    wow. what is going in the minds of MS execs heads? dont they realize they are quickly losing ground, prestige and time to open source and apple?

    just wow.

    i mean how long does it take to quickly put together some new code for the same functions, a brand spanking new GUI and lots of "cool" new "features"? ... no seriously im asking, i figure microsoft has some experience with this question. /honest frustation

    --
    Mike
    I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
  11. Sort of like by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dan Lyons saying something bad about a Microsoft product is about like FoxNews (you know, "Fair and Balanced") saying something good about a liberal politician. Next thing you know, Dan will be saying good things about Linux and FoxNews will endorse Hillary for President.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Sort of like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do my posts get modded down when I quote a conservative in my sig? Liberal bias? On Slashdot? Nah!

      Perhaps its just that the liberal in your quote is an asshat? Does the quote contain the words "liberal" or "conservative"? Maybe you should take off the polarized glasses. A good first step would be to pick a topic, make sound sound objective arguments and hear the rebuttal. Too often people think that merely labeling a postition or person as "liberal" or "conservative" is enough to discredit it/him. Try making your case without ever using those two labels. If you can.
    2. Re:Sort of like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we all know CBS, ABC, and NBC are ALL deeply concerned with being Fair. At least fox has opposing view on.

    3. Re:Sort of like by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Lyons's readership (us) can actually benefit by Lyons's advice of avoiding Microsoft and trying Apple products. Fox's viewership doesn't benefit at all from getting a candy-coated version of war and Congressional politics.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    4. Re:Sort of like by labratuk · · Score: 1
      Why do my posts get modded down when I quote a conservative in my sig? Liberal bias? On Slashdot? Nah!

      Because they think the quote is retarded?

      Because on /. you're speaking to the whole world*, which on the whole finds the U.S.'s concepts of 'liberal' and 'conservative' absolutely hilarious. A 'liberal' U.S. politician would be considered very conservative in most other political systems?

      Conservative bias? In the U.S.? Nah!

      * Not just your little insular paranoia-fest.
      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  12. Best Quote about Vista? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Funny

    The new 'Aero' technology is no match for my sisters' Airhead logic.

    I feel your pain.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  13. Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can hate Microsoft as much as the next guy. But seriously, I think I must be one of the few on here who's actually had it with all the M$FT bashing in spite of hatred of Microsoft. Why? Because it seems that Open Office and Macs get a free pass on here, while there is a serious bias towards Microsoft being negatively reviewed. Meanwhile any inferiority in Mac OS X and Apple monopolistic tactics are openly defended by an army of fanboys. A lot of Windows users simply DO NOT LIKE the Mac. And rather than figure out why, the Mac elitists claim the fault must lie with the user.
    "Find Open Office hard to use? You must be a moron."

    I've had it with the love fest with anything that is not M$FT. Can we stop putting "I hate M$FT" opinion pieces on here. And also let's have REVIEWS, and not unbalanced free passes for Mac OS X and Open Office. IE7 does have some cool features like Quick tabs, and the leaner interface etc.

    Before the IE7 hate dogs talk about security, let's not forget Mac OS X does have issues too, they have had remotely exploitable security holes they had to fix. Except none of the fanboys were even aware.

    Windows hasn't had a wormable network exploit since SP2 (thanks to the firewall).

    I have used the Vista betas, they're fine. If someone is going to go on a hate M$FT bash fest, that's fine.. but I don't care about it. I want scientific analysis.

    1. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by fatted · · Score: 3, Funny
      I think I must be one of the few on here who's actually had it with all the M$FT bashing...
      I've had it with the love fest with anything that is not M$FT...
      I want scientific analysis...
      I'm not sure you're really getting this whole slashdot thing...
    2. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is "They're better than the utterly steaming piece of shit they used to be, so I'll let them shove DRM on me and treat me like a criminal by default"?
      Thanks, I like Linux. It doesn't hate me.

    3. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill? You shouldn't read /., it's not good for your bloodpressure. Now take your medication and go read something wholesome like microsoft.com/getthefacts... That's the charm.

    4. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by shimage · · Score: 1
      A lot of Windows users simply DO NOT LIKE the Mac. And rather than figure out why, the Mac elitists claim the fault must lie with the user.
      "Find Open Office hard to use? You must be a moron."

      Mac fanboys don't use OpenOffice; they can get MS Office the same way Windows users get it. I don't know a single mac user that uses OOorg. In fact, I don't actually know anyone that can actually stand using it (you know, someone that I've seen and talked to). Not because it's "tough to use", as you imply, but because it is completely and utterly insufficient as an Office replacement. That is to say, it's features are sorely lacking and compatibility with MS (it's raison d'etre, as far as I'm concerned) is shoddy at best. I know this because I have to use it every time some shmuck sends me something in .doc format, seeing as how MS doesn't support linux (yes, I know about crossover office). Oh yeah, so I suppose that makes me a linux zealot now.
    5. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      On the Mac I use NeoOffice because regular OpenOffice is an X11 app. I don't use MS Office because I don't see why - for me the only difference between MS Office and OpenOffice is that MS Office is bigger and more expensive. Yes, I have already used it.

      And yes, I do find OpenOffice hard to use, but that applies to every office suite I've seen (especially MS Office, which is the very definition of clutter). I prefer simple interfaces, but I guess it's not possible to implement that in a progrm that tries to have three hundred different operations right at your fingertips... If there was a WYSIWYG TeX editor I'd probably demote *Office to a pure .doc opener. I just don't want to have to put up with elephantine programs that have sixteen times the functionality I need (and want).

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "I can hate Microsoft as much as the next guy."

      No, you can't.

      You're a Windows shill pretending not to be.

      Doesn't fly here.

      Fuck off, Windows fanboy.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    7. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by shimage · · Score: 1

      Well, if you can do without the more useful features of Office, more power to you; I'm glad that you've been able to save yourself some money. For the rest of us, OpenOffice is simply a travesty; if you really want me to go into what it's lacking, I will, but I don't think either of us really cares that much. The biggy for me is that the more advanced features (where advanced is something as rudimentary as an equation editor) are either completely absent or incompatible with Microsoft's implementation. As for WYSIWYG interfaces, I think you're throwing out the baby with the bath water, but if you insist there's (if you can stand using X11, which evidently you have problems with) LyX and TeXmacs. I must be a freak, since I actually find it less intuitive to use either of those programs than it is to just write LaTeX in a decent text editor, despite the fact that I was introduced to TeX via LyX (I like Kile best, but iTeXmac is the best I've seen on OSX).

    8. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      As for X11, I only dislike it on the Mac because I value integration; X11 apps just aren't Mac-like.
      As for the WYSIWYG interfaces: I can do TeX by hand, but I'm not really good at it (and I don't like the syntax). Especially when taking notes during a lecture I'm too slow with TeX, forcing me to translate everything to ASCII. A graphical interface would help with that.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Yes Yes M$FT sucks we know we know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to call the kettle black, pot.

  14. Waddya expect? by FishandChips · · Score: 3, Informative

    Vista and MS Office 2007 are the two headline-grabbing cash cows of the business and Microsoft has nothing to show until next year. Folks can scent blood behind the scenes with rumours of massive rewrites, etc. Microsoft is a big business with lots of products, but these are the two everyone focuses on, in the pop press at least. And the press and Wall Street have the whole of the rest of this year to stick it to Microsoft, if they so choose, and get a little payback for all the uppity treatment they've received over the years. And with nothing in the locker except more press announcements that no one really believes, Microsoft will just have to stand there and take it on the chin.

    2006 could turn out to be Microsoft's annus horribilis, since the chances must be very high they'll soon have to fess up and say Janaury 2007 is a bad time to launch Vista. And with every day that passes, more folks will get pissed off with the XP malware explosion. Couldn't have happened to nicer guys :):)

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
    1. Re:Waddya expect? by Swanktastic · · Score: 1

      2006 could turn out to be Microsoft's annus horribilis, since the chances must be very high they'll soon have to fess up and say Janaury 2007 is a bad time to launch Vista

      What a coincidence! Vista comes from Microsoft's anus horribilis.

    2. Re:Waddya expect? by pedalman · · Score: 1
      2006 could turn out to be Microsoft's annus horribilis
      annus horribilis? That sounds like the rear view of my aunt Edna.
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    3. Re:Waddya expect? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      what's gonna hurt more is that they're trying to ease the pain for the investors by saying they're increasing production of the xbox game console. The problem is that each sale of xbox is a rather large loss and they're going to have to find an innovative way of hiding that. Granted, the Windows CE division isn't losing $250 million per quarter anymore but without the boost in sales from MS Vista this year, where are they going to pull the numbers from? Can they cut R&D again and spread that out? They cut it pretty good last time. If sales slow in anticipation of new releases of MS Windows and MS Office, that's gonna hurt two thirds of their profit generators.

      It'll be an interesting year for Microsoft. They'll be innovating up the ying-yang in the marketing department, that's for sure.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Waddya expect? by shimage · · Score: 1
      annus horribilis? That sounds like the rear view of my aunt Edna.
      That would be "anus": one "n". At risk of being pedantic and condescending, "annus" (note, two "n"s) is year, as in annual. Yeah, I get the joke, I'm just trying to point out that spelling counts.
  15. People ready by caffeination · · Score: 1
    So the new slogan is Windows Vista - People ready.

    Windows Vista - People Ready. Just the tool you need to leverage your agile interpersonal synergy to streamline the digital solution engineering process.

    A load of arm-waving to distract people from the added lockdown technology? According to this reporter, yes.

  16. Groundhog Day by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    Quoth Daniel Lyons in TFA:
    > Instead, we got a demo that was about as compelling as a root canal followed by a 15-minute press conference with Ballmer, the Microsoft chief executive who seems incapable of speaking at any level softer than a bellow.
    >[...]
    >I wonder if Ballmer ever feels like the guy in Groundhog Day, reliving the same press conference, over and over. I know I do.

    Developers. Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers.

    Gee, I wonder why it feels like Groundhog Day.

    (I was in the Virgin Islands once. I met Natalie Portman. We ate hot grits and drank pina coladas from tikis made of petrified wood. At sunset we made love like sea otters. *That* was a pretty good day. Why couldn't I get that day over and over and over...)

    1. Re:Groundhog Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developers. Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers.

      Source code! Source Code!

      Sorry, but somebody might find that funny

  17. Software Assurance and Date Slippage by E-Sabbath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As I understand things, many Software Assurance Plans, which were essentially forced on customers with the claim that Longhorn would be available, expire as of 12/31/06.

    I wonder if there may be issues with claims salesmen made and this date slippage.

    1. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by hcob$ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hrrrm, breach of contract litigation? The lawyers must be salivating hoping those contracts expire soon! Microsoft now seems to be like the fat guy someone "accidentially" cuts and then suggests that big boi gets into the shark infested waters.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    2. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by duerra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I understand things, many Software Assurance Plans, which were essentially forced on customers with the claim that Longhorn would be available, expire as of 12/31/06.

      I wonder if there may be issues with claims salesmen made and this date slippage.


      My guess is that is exactly why Microsoft is releasing Vista to certain parties still this year. The delay is only for end consumers of Vista, to which Microsoft has no contractual upgrade requirements.

    3. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've just learned that Vista Corporate is not gettin delayed -- and the place I work for will be rolling it out in our call centers, unfortunately. Even the people doing the installations don't want it because the new hardware requirements are ridiculous, but we're forced to upgrade or go unsupported because of Software Assurance. The odd thing is that everyone worries much about support -- yet in call centers totalling over 7000 employees, plus another few thousand in other areas of the Company, I am not aware of ONE case in which we've had to actually use this support.

    4. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by javaxman · · Score: 2, Informative
      My guess is that is exactly why Microsoft is releasing Vista to certain parties still this year. The delay is only for end consumers of Vista, to which Microsoft has no contractual upgrade requirements.

      Wow. Just wow.

      It's so obvious, we all missed it. Thank you. That's some awesome corporate crap in action right there. I'm not even sure I understand all of the implications fully, it's so mind-numbingly corporate-contract-hardball. Wow.

      Did these guys all just pay for support contracts that essentially make them paying beta testers? Can someone pick this up and explain what's going on here a little more? I'm fascinated by this contract date expiration date and what it means... what is Microsoft obligated to provide in terms of OS to these support contract holders?

      Is this some sort of underhanded way to penalize folks who don't have these contracts, providing further incentive for them to get similar contracts in the future ? Might that imply that the 2007 ship date was envisioned long ago ? Is that too sneaky even for Microsoft, am I reading too much into this ?

    5. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by E-Sabbath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was the implication I was considering in my original comment. I wasn't sure if other people would view it that way, but it seems possible, which means we could have a forked code-base until SP1 or 2 of Vista. This could be kind of bad from a support and code perspective.

    6. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > Might that imply that the 2007 ship date was envisioned long ago ? Is that too sneaky even for Microsoft, am I reading too much into this ?

      Not exactly. What happened was that microsoft saw the writting on the wall: they were going to have several years with slower paying upgrades, because, well, 2k was good enough, and business took the habit of skipping 1 release cycles (ie: the ones that went NT4 at the end of his life cycle were going to XP). At this point, there was little reasons for people to upgrade.

      And there was little innovative software on the horizon, and little reasons for people to upgrade.

      There are exactly 2 things that microsoft cannot afford: uncertainety on revenue on Windows, and uncertainety on Office. (the stock would fell. If the stock fell, hell occurs, because it will increase their operating costs [microsoft salaries are lower than the norm because employees get stock options]. If operating costs raise, stock will fall harder). They have to protect their two revenue streams at all cost.

      So they decided to change the contracts, and to, basically, lease software. This way, the revenue stream is guaranteed. Furthermore, if a company goes software assurance, the microsoft budget is pretty much fixed years after years, effectively paying a microsoft tax. The company will also have incentive to use microsoft-only technology, enforcing the network effect, and eroding presence of competing software.

      So they went to CIO, and said:

      - [ms] Go Software Assurance, it is cheaper
      - [cfo] We don't care, we don't plan to upgrade
      - [ms] You will have to upgrade to Longhorn at some point
      - [cfo] We'll see at this time
      - [ms] Longhorn Licensing will be very expensive
      - [cfo] ...
      - [ms] Unless you Go Software Assurance, because it includes Longhorn
      - [cfo] Why should I beleive you ?
      - [ms] Because it will be written in the contract

      So, Software assurance expiring in 2006 have Longhorn in the contract. What is worse for Microsoft is that Generally Accepted Account Practices impose that you CANNOT recognize revenue on software UNLESS you have shipped it to the paying customer (in general on a physical media).

      So microsoft is doubly obligated to ship Longhorn for Software Assurance this year:

      First, they will have trouble recognizing the SA revenue (maybe they can buy some law modifications ?)
      Second, their SA customers will sue them (and give them the finger)

      So, stay tuned for even more features getting removed from Vista in the next few months. Mirosoft took money for value that was not created yet. This value have been reflected in the stock price, which is now inflated. If they don't deliver, the emperor will be naked.

    7. Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      Hrrrm, breach of contract litigation?

      I'm sure that there is a clause in the SA agreement that give MS a loophole. Or the lanaguage was of "may provide an upgrade" and not "will provide an upgrade" variety.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  18. Tools by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    Forbes Says Vista not People Ready

    That's because only tools work with windows, right? Is it tool ready?

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  19. It is people ready... by solarbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...people will just have to twist their ways until it fits. "To open the CD-Rom you just have to press ALT+E+P with you hands then Num Lock with your nose and it will eject"

    --
    SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    1. Re:It is people ready... by CielChocobo · · Score: 1

      ...people will just have to twist their ways until it fits. "To open the CD-Rom you just have to press ALT+E+P with you hands then Num Lock with your nose and it will eject" this is the funniest thing I've seen all week =)

    2. Re:It is people ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How did emacs get into this discussion?

    3. Re:It is people ready... by holdenholden · · Score: 1

      This is really funny ;-)! / emacs user

    4. Re:It is people ready... by justaguylikeme · · Score: 1

      Not that far from the truth either! (Also emacs user)

  20. IBM doesn't innovate? by wishiwascool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So Balmer says IBM doesn't innovate anymore?

    Hmmm... check out a couple posts down on /.
    Something about nanotubes and stuff... hardly innovation.

    1. Re:IBM doesn't innovate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Microsoft IBM doesn't innovate, in the same way that to the PRC government the Tiananman massacre never happened.

      (I managed to say something non-PC without going anywhere near Godwin! Where's my prize?)

    2. Re:IBM doesn't innovate? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      New ring oscillators using a single nanotube is a just a technical innovation. Balmer / Gates / Microsoft talk about REAL innovation! Marketing innovations. Here are some examples of real Microsoft innovations: "Vista - People Ready", "Microsft - Plays For Sure", and let's not forget, "Microsoft - Get The Facts". THOSE are Microsoft innovations. IBM has nothing. ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  21. Vista: "Impacting People" by shrubya · · Score: 4, Funny
    Quote:
    Microsoft execs also talked about "Impacting People,"

    You see, this is an example of where the article goes wrong. Daniel Lyons didn't realize they were talking about this kind of impaction.

  22. Apple = stable? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1
    "Apple's new operating system is stable, reliable and easy to use."

    Obviously the owner doesn't use a MiniMac. I keep a paper list of the three- and four-key magic keypresses you need to reset memory, kill hung programs (especially anything with Java) and force a shutdown taped to mine.

    1. Re:Apple = stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you said "MiniMac", Java and that you had to make a note of a couple of combo keys, I realized that maybe Mac OS X isn' the problem in your case.

    2. Re:Apple = stable? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Sounds as if you have something horribly wrong with the machine. It might be hardware, or it might simply be a corrupt system/set of preferences/something else.

      Either way, I would scoot off to Apple's support forums and ask there, you'll get some basic troubleshooting advice and it might be that you have to take the machine back.

    3. Re:Apple = stable? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Ok, something's wrong with that. I've had an iBook for like 9 or 10 months, and it's crashed twice. Apparently I have an issue with my Logitech headset and sleep mode. I put it to sleep, wake it up, and remove the headset while it's waking up. Got that "You need to restart" screen in about 10 langauges. The second time, I installed Pathfinder, removed the Finder, and restarted, forgetting that I had set Pathfinder to quit the Finder and launch at startup. So Pathfinder loaded as the Finder, quit, then reloaded, quit, then reloaded, etc... (That one was completely my fault)

  23. When you combine people and technology.. by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... you get the fricking Borg !!


    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  24. Simpsons episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It things keep this pace, I will predict a scene similar to when Krusty was trying to entertain a group of people; he asked if they wanted to know about some dirty infection he was suffering and then realized that nobody was interested, he then shouted and said:
    Krusty: You are the worst public I have met!
    The crowd shouted back: and you are the worst clown!
    Krusty: Oh Yeah?, in that case, we will just stay here for 30 minutes without saying a word.

  25. Egad! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination."

    As SciFi has clearly pointed out, this is not a good idea...

    Goodness. There's a frightening thought. Armies of hostile chav cyborgs in their Tommy Hilfiger jackets, slaughtering their way through the human race...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  26. what a waste of time by matt328 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why I hate blogs. I see a story on slashdot, and click through to the article expecting to find news. You know, a simple reporting of some facts. Only after reading the article do I realize this isn't news, its just some asshole bitching about Microsoft, and I really don't give two shits what he has to say. The only real news I can gather from this article is that Microsoft held some press conference or tech demo of some sort, and this guy hated it.

    Slanted, one sided, inaccurate and biased blog entries are not news. Please stop subjecting us to them.

    --
    Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    1. Re:what a waste of time by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Which part of "Daniel Lyons has an opinion piece up on Forbes.com" Did you fail to understand?

    2. Re:what a waste of time by cultrhetor · · Score: 0

      But...but...but... Blog-reading is the only use to which I put my RSS newsreaders :) - You don't expect me to read ACTUAL news, do you?

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    3. Re:what a waste of time by Locutus · · Score: 1

      your first mistake is to expect to find "news" about Microsoft. There is very little out there since most of it is classified as PR. You'll have to read through hundreds of articles/blogs/ads/court documents to find a scent of some interesting material containing facts pertaining to real product, features, etc.

      That little bit about this particular being an opinion piece also should have given you a clue about the 'value' of this story.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  27. Microsoft is Run by Their Department by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    I've always said that Microsoft is run by their marketing department, not their engineering department. The thing is that, now it's starting to show. And, now that people are starting to get exposed to what they can get for free, some of them are starting to wonder why they're paying hundreds or dollars a pop for useless eye candy.

    It's a good sign, I think.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  28. Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketing by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Windows Vista -- Get The Facts"
    "Windows Vista -- A Powerful Combination Of Combined Powers"
    "Windows Vista -- Sheep Ready"
    "Windows Vista -- Because The Richest Bloke In The World Says So"
    "Windows Vista -- Almost Ready"
    "Windows Vista -- Or I Hit You With This Chair"

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  29. Can we go one day without Vista stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like Microsoft's internal memo saying that they would try to make sure some significant news on Vista came out each day is alive and well on Slashdot. Every god damn day, we have a Windows Vista story on here and every day is the same old comments. Can we please vote for a Vista free day please?

    1. Re:Can we go one day without Vista stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats like having a MAC free day, Vista is news, like it or not....

  30. Opinion piece lacked reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, Dan, I was with you there until that last paragraph where your Apple sales pitch kicked in.

    Yeah I expected some sort of reasons WHY Vista wasn't people ready in his vent fest. But he didnt give any. So basically he said "Vista sucks, fuck you. Kiss kiss muaah Apple I love you." Guess Forbes needs the money.

    Now, I already know Microsoft sucks. And yeah Steve Jobs loves you and me. But quite frankly I'm not super happy to read someone's rant unless they justify why they think something.

    By the way .. your window grouping example is their "Expose" competitor .. you have to keep pressing Ctrl-alt-tab or something to keep it that way. It's not like you can move the windows into a diagonla position permanently .. if they do get it stuck in that way ask them to lift their hands from the keyboard and ask how they dialed your number without using
    their hands.

  31. There's a thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Armies of hostile chav cyborgs in their Tommy Hilfiger jackets, slaughtering their way through the human race...

    Let's sell it to Utah! :)

  32. Biologists Don't Do Windows... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work for a large biotech company. Upper management uses Windows-based systems, as does manufacturing.

    However, I work in research. Until recently the systems were about 50-50 Windows / Mac with the exceptions of bioinformatics (mostly Linux), and cheminformatics (mostly Irix). However, more recently, vendors have been phasing out the use of Windows for instrumentation control in favor of Linux. Nearly all the structural chemistry applications have moved to Linux, and most genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics software is now Linux-based (and, frequently, runs just fine on Macs too). Macs are still pretty popular, but the use of Windows in research is pretty much considered "legacy" at this point.

    If you come from an academic environment in contemporary biology, you were probably weened on Mac OS, or Solaris (when I was in grad school). If it's more recent, it's most definitely OS/X or Linux. It's also clear that Linux is rapidly becoming the platform-of-choice for apps in biotech and pharamceutical research, but with a heavy emphasis on WEB-based technologies.

    That's not to say that there aren't users that use nothing but Excel and Word, but that's not so common anymore in research (at least were I work and in my previous job). This poses a big problem for our IT department -- they aren't prepared to support Linux desktops and Mac OS/X, yet those are the platforms where most of our applications run.

    Biolgists either don't do computers at all (particularly "old school" biologists), or, if they do, Windows is not what they have the most experience with...

    1. Re:Biologists Don't Do Windows... by xiao_haozi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology research and I have to agree with FC's observation. From my experience at 4 different universities, I would have to guestimate that about 80+ percent of the labs were Apple labs (OS 9 for some instrumentation and OS X for general use machines). The remaining 20 percent I would have to say was a large fraction of Unix or Linux machines (sometimes clusters for crystallization experiments and modelling). I'm sure this is not the case in all of academia, but is probably somewhat close. What is also interesting is seeing all the analysis applications are mostly oss that are posix based. This makes things very nice as it doesn't chunk of change of our dwindling research budgets and allows for modification of the software to meet specific needs and experimental changes. One thing though I have come across is the prevelance of Excel to analyze data and keep track of results/graphing etc. -pardon the spelling and grammar mistakes...

    2. Re:Biologists Don't Do Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you run mostly Linux apps, but occasionally need to run Windows, just have Windows installed in a VMware image. It'll run fine under Linux.

    3. Re:Biologists Don't Do Windows... by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      That is happening on all research areas. Research takes more of a computer than a normal Windows installation have to offer, and using Linux is much easier than installing all 3rd party apps that you need (installing software on Windows is hard).

    4. Re:Biologists Don't Do Windows... by Rutulian · · Score: 1

      I would absolutely love to have an all Linux/Mac lab, but unfortunately there are still quite a few must have Windows programs for our work:
          Unicorn (for FPLC control)
          Chemstation (for HPLC and spectrophotometer control)
          Dynafit (essential for almost any sort of kinetics experiment)
          Origin (Matlab will work for most data analysis purposes, but Origin is nice for other things, and required for ITC)
          Endnote (Yes, I prefer Latex, but everybody else uses Endnote)
          SciFinder Scholar (Windows only, as far as I know)
          ChemOffice

      I would probably also have a hard time weening people from Office. It is still fairly ubiquitous for PowerPoint et al. OpenOffice would probably do the job, but it is hard to convince people, especially when you need things like Endnote and custom templates/macros.

  33. man-mustard?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dude, if it's coming out of you yellow, then you need to see a doctor, now.

  34. MOD LEGAL GUARDIAN UP by caffeination · · Score: 2, Funny

    Splendid discernment. Simply splendid.

  35. The doctor is in by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology. Each considers me their personal tech support when anything "breaks." It sucks.

    OK, you clearly have issues.

    What you haven't realized is your hostility towards your sisters is a form of transferance. You are transferring your need to show your mother that you are a competent adult (and thus worthy of regard) onto your sisters, and projecting your own infantile dependency onto them. It is worth noting that while you must constantly demonstrate your expertise and competence in computers to them, they have no compulsion to retern the favor by offering you help in their area of expertise. Likely this difference is due to insecure paternal attachment on your part. Could this be unresolved castration anxiety? Certainly that would explain the difference between you and you sisters. In any case, the underlying assymetry in your relationship reinforces your infantile anxiety, which creates rage, part of which is displaced onto Microsoft, the balance of which is sublimated in the form of further demonstrations of technical competence. Naturally, such heroic (dare I say histrionic?) demonstrations of technical finesse that only exacerabate your problem.

    What you need to do is to address the imbalance in your relationship to your sisters. A few concrete suggestions:

    * Encourage them to install the beta of Vista. Then when they have problems, throw up your hands and confess you don't know anything about Microsoft operating systems.

    * Develop a stock response to technical question and consistently use it for every problem no matter how trivial e.g., "Try reformatting your hard drive and reinstalling the operating system." This will encourage your sisters to be less dependent on you.

    * Demand that your sisters provide you with equivalent services in their areas of expertise. For example, why did your last batch of homebrew beer come out sour? What can you do about the crabgrass on your lawn? When you are going out on a date after work, how can you avoid having body odor even if you've showered in the morning (claim you are allergic to deoderant)?

    Follow this strategy, and you cannot help but develop a more adult, mutually satisfying relationship with your siblings.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:The doctor is in by patricksevenlee · · Score: 1

      What you haven't realized is your hostility towards your sisters is a form of transferance. You are transferring your need to show your mother that you are a competent adult (and thus worthy of regard) onto your sisters, and projecting your own infantile dependency onto them. It is worth noting that while you must constantly demonstrate your expertise and competence in computers to them, they have no compulsion to retern the favor by offering you help in their area of expertise.

      Give the guy a break. He's a computer whiz, his sisters are biologists. What practical use does he have for biologists? Maybe he should ask them to massage his prostate?? Sheesh.

  36. Aiming too high by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft keep aiming too high. In the end, it's as simple as that.

    The executives who are driving the show like to promote corporation-wide initiatives (.Net springs to mind) but they lack the clarity of vision and coherence of presentation to get their message across. This is, of course, assuming that they're clear themselves about what their initiative seeks to achieve, which I doubt in many cases. Once you're detached from clear goals and clear plans to achieve them, and you descend into corporate initiative, business imperative, growth driver, buzzword buzzword zzzzz territory, you'll sink right to the bottom in no time.

    The next level down - the guys who are basically running the show for Windows, or Office, or the more minor products like Visual Studio - are constantly in a state of flux because they don't know where the corporation-wide initiatives are driving them. Worse yet, they don't know where they're driving each other, but it's surely somewhere: if you want a radical new UI in Vista, you've got to have the tools to write programs that use it in Visual Studio, and your next version of Office has to fit in with the style, for example.

    Now, the guys working on the products keep coming up with revolutionary new features that require dramatic changes in a single version. These are always a risk, and if things don't work out, it's rare that you can half-implement the good bits and scrap the rest, so you get cancellation of the entire feature if bad stuff happens. Combine that with the constant changes in high level business plans and such, particularly pressure to get a release out in time for this or that shareholder meeting (that means you, VS2005 team) and you can see why often these things do suffer catastrophic failure.

    So, if your next release is based on three Big Features(TM), as was the case with Vista originally, and these then start falling to the wayside under business pressures, what do you do? You can't cancel them all, or you've got no product and your reputation is mud, but if you can't get them ready in time either, then your release dates keep slipping and your reputation is a different colour of mud. Such is the price you pay when you decide to go for the big features and not across-the-board, incremental improvements, and that's the mistake they keep making.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Aiming too high by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      The ability to program for the interface is probably mostly already in VS 2k3 and 2005. Neither Office or VS blend into Windows and each other, so I don't think blending in with one another is a driving factor among those teams. More likely they just make sure their interface doesn't turn into shit when ran on a different version of Windows or the next release. That means doing their own widgets for most of the interface ;o

  37. Daniel Lyons Has a History... by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... of bashing Microsoft and promoting Apple.

    He also isn't a big fan of Linux.

    This guy is widely considered a hack.

    I've been using Vista build 5308 for almost a month now as my primary "home" machine. At first I was a little taken back by some of the UI changes, but overall I really do like it. In fact, when I move back to XP it really hurts because of things I miss from Vista.

    This guy's critcisms of Vista are so vague it's hard to even know what parts of Vista he is talking about.

    "The new programs are phenomenally complex, with scores of buttons and pull-down menus and myriad connections among various applications."

    Huh? Which new applications? In most case, Microsoft has decreased, not increased, the number of UI elements.

    1. Re:Daniel Lyons Has a History... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This guy's critcisms of Vista are so vague it's hard to even know what parts of Vista he is talking about.
      Unlike your nice explanation of why you like vista : "when I move back to XP it really hurts because of things I miss from Vista"

    2. Re:Daniel Lyons Has a History... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, the grandparent reminds me of the old Fark cliche/troll: "I work for Micosoft and some of you like to pretend you know what you're talking about...". Sure, Vista is so good you can't live without it and Microsoft won't let us live with it for another year. Now that's what I call good!

    3. Re:Daniel Lyons Has a History... by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Features I Love in Vista:

      1.) The address bar.
      The address bar in Vista allows for both manual typing of addresses, as well as a more point/click navigational scheme. I can click any of the folder names in my current path and it gives me a list of all sibling folders. Very handy for navigation. It also has a built in progress bar for when explorer is performing a long running task related to displaying the files in a folder. It even lets you cancel that task.

      2.) The new start menu.
      The start menu is SO much better it's ridiculous. Finding applications and files is finally a near instant task... even more so than with 3rd party desktop search tools. The new layout is, for the most part, clearer and simpler to use.

      3.) Flip 3d.
      It might sound cheesy, but it's actually a great way of switching windows. I find it at least as useful as Expose on the Mac... and, in some cases, its better because my windows don't get tiny and I can still see what's going on inside them. (It's all live too, no bitmaps here.)

      4.) Task bar previews.
      If you hover over a task bar button it will show you a live preview of the task. At first I thought it was kinda pointless, but after a while I started to like it. I find myself hovering over task bar buttons in vain on XP.

      5.) Windows Mail.
      SO MUCH BETTER THAN OUTLOOK EXPRESS. I don't like using Outlook at home. It's too slow, and it doesn't do newsgroups. Outlook Express has always been a pain, especially when talking about how it stores your e-mail / newsgroups. Windows Mail is more streamlined, a LOT faster, and finally has an easily to understand storage mechanism.

      6.) User Account Protection
      I love the fact that it's finally trivial to run as a non-Admin on Windows and still be able to get things done. You've always been able to do it, but it used to be a lot harder.

      There are plenty of other things I really love about Vista... but I'm tired of typing.

    4. Re:Daniel Lyons Has a History... by portnoy · · Score: 1

      That article is your exemplar for Daniel Lyons' "bashing Microsoft and promoting Apple"? Really? The one where he spends most of the time critiquing open-source software, and the only Apple-related line is "But for whatever reason, most customers will continue paying for Windows, or switch to Apple Computer's Mac OS."?

    5. Re:Daniel Lyons Has a History... by ickoonite · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (It's all live too, no bitmaps here.)

      So is Exposé, if that was your implication.

      iqu :|

  38. Outsource them here! by donscarletti · · Score: 1, Funny
    If your sisters have any reproductive queries, outsource them to my "callcentre", I'd be happy to take them, it's cheaper than a phonesex hotline and I get the satisfaction of doing something for the community.

    Interestingly enough, when I was 17 I was asked by an attractive 22 year old woman what the difference between sperm and semen was. I cowardly responded by explaining the differences using technical language, rather than the slightly contrived situation involving a "practical lesson" that I ususally tell my friends.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:Outsource them here! by cluke · · Score: 4, Funny

      My mind is kind of boggling at any sort of practical demo that could illustrate that difference.

      "Yes, and this stuff in my hand is semen, which I will now smear on to a slide - if you will come over and look into this microscope..."

      (As an aside, I wonder who was the first guy to look at semen in a microscope? That dude must have been freaked the fuck out, big time!)

    2. Re:Outsource them here! by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder who was the first guy to look at semen in a microscope?

      Probably Anton van Leeuwenhoek.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Outsource them here! by cluke · · Score: 1

      Nice. I wonder if history records his level of freakage?

      "I hope everyone's looks like this..."

    4. Re:Outsource them here! by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably fairly high. I recall him and a number of other early microscopists being convinced that they could see a little tiny human embryo in the head, much like the early telescopists were convinced they could see canals on Mars.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:Outsource them here! by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the first things they looked at was bodily fluids, with the early microscopes, but there are so many other wiggly, squiggly things to see, that are much larger and easier to see (sperm are *really* small cells compared to rotifers and bacteria with vibrating or rotary cilia/flagella) that by the time they got good enough to see the really small stuff they were probably initially wondering whether those were just more of what they'd already seen.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    6. Re:Outsource them here! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Probably fairly high. I recall him and a number of other early microscopists being convinced that they could see a little tiny human embryo in the head, much like the early telescopists were convinced they could see canals on Mars.

      Ya know, he was from Amsterdam, after all. Not saying anything, just throwin' it out there. Could have had something to do with him seeing things.

    7. Re:Outsource them here! by tsa · · Score: 1

      He lived in Delft for most of his life. Delft is a small town full of pricks. I know, because my brother lives there :-)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    8. Re:Outsource them here! by gold23 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my money's on Robert Hooke whose book Micrographia, published in 1664, inspired van Leeuwenhoek to expand his microscopic horizons, so to speak.

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    9. Re:Outsource them here! by mqduck · · Score: 1

      I recall him and a number of other early microscopists being convinced that they could see a little tiny human embryo in the head

      To satisfy my own curiosity, do you have any links about this?

      --
      Property is theft.
    10. Re:Outsource them here! by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I do but they're all to pages in microbiology books I have on my shelves, alas. I'll look around, though.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  39. Stingy brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Each considers me their personal tech support when anything "breaks." It sucks. "

    Don't be the stingy brother, especially if your siblings are coming to you for 100% of their computer support. Rather than turning of your mobile phone, just shell out for a Macintosh or two. Then time spent with your siblings will be spent on someting other than computer repair.

    My mother was constantly complaining about her MS Windows machine and even about my brother in-law's support. Finally I just bought an iMac for her, put it on her desk and showed her where Thunderbird, Firefox and OpenOffice were and how to copy files to the net and to USB flash drives. She's been happy as a clam since and support calls have gone down to more or less nothing.

    The one big grip left, which keeps that other machine around with its antiquated MS technology is that f*ing card sorting program. Where can a free, exact look-alike for MS Solitaire be downloaded.

    1. Re:Stingy brother by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I've done the same thing and it is so true, double true.

      Buy them a mac, Mac mini or iMac.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    2. Re:Stingy brother by lerxstz · · Score: 1

      Not quite exact looking, but there is a free dashboard widget for solitaire. Haven't used it so can't say if it's any good or not.

      --
      I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
  40. I'll Use what the bossman... by i_am_the_r00t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    puts on my laptop. I'm a sheep. Aren't we all?

    Right now it's XP and Office 2003.
    As long as I can hook it up to a projector and bore the crap out of a room full of people with 83 Powerpoint slides, The Bossman is happy.

    I don't see big corporations being first in line for a shiny new OS that practically triples the minimum hardware requirement.

    At Home I'll use whatever Valve software tells me to use so I can Play Half-Life 3. Sheep, remember?

    1. Re:I'll Use what the bossman... by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      Huh. This is by no means meant as an insult, but, I suspect you aren't the target audience of this website.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    2. Re:I'll Use what the bossman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? he didn't mention openoffice or linux? kept it too real for you? told it like it is? people want to continue making a living and playing games at home and not every geek wants to spend 4 months getting the audio to work on their damn home pc...

  41. Star Trek Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination"

    Yeah, its called the Borg.

    RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!!!!

  42. X-360 by glenrm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    XBox 360 and Games are all MSFT has going for it now. But why don't people switch? The answer is obvious XP works well enough for most people, of course that doesn't help Vista either. To me the place where open source will make up the most ground is on the application side. Linux may not gain ground for a long time, but Mozilla, Thunderbird, and Open Office will, as can many other closed apps.

  43. MS botched PR 101 by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems MS missed the basics of press relations. When you call the press out to a dog and pony show, we (yes, I am one) generally try to give a fair representation of what happened. Events and press conferences are generally one sided, IE good for the people putting on the act. So are trade shows, you get to see the shiny happy things, and there is no time or forum to dig in and see all the warts.

    This leads to almost universally good news on all the applicable outlets. If the show is interesting, all the better, we will sit there and smile, taking notes and pictures.

    Now, if you bore us to tears with stupid, irrelevant and wrong info, we will sit there for 60-90 minutes and think up ways to make your life pain, usually in the form of an article. We sit there, turn to the guy next to us and crack jokes about everything and anything, relevant or not. Nothing tends to be sacred.

    Yep, the MS people botched this one bad, and the Lyons piece is a good example of this. They promised the moon, gave nothing, and did it in a way that from the sound of it was thoroughly unpleasant to watch.

    And they are wondering why they got hammered. Duh. If you are going to take up our time, don't waste it. If you do, you almost guarantee your product will be panned.

    As a corolary to this, fill the press section with syncophantic or bribed tame press, then do what you want. This is a time honored tradition that works well, but if you do it too often with sucky presentation, it will bite you, your costs will go up. Look at... well, that would be telling.

              -Charlie

    P.S. Take this article with a big grain of salt. Anyone still defending SCO is pretty suspect in my book, but that is just one reporter's opinion.

    1. Re:MS botched PR 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, if you compare Charlie's writing on the Inquirer and what this Forbes guy has written, you'll find the tone and substance eerily similar.

      It's almost like...well, that would be telling. ;)

  44. Windows XP is my last Microsoft OS by drgroove · · Score: 2

    I won't purchase Vista, nor will I purchase a PC if I am forced to take it with Vista on it.

    I'll still use Windows XP and/or 2000 as a dual-boot, either on an Ubuntu AMD system (after converting my HP AMD laptop to Ubuntu), or on an Apple OSX dual boot with XP on it. This is only until /all/ of the software I either need to run is available for OSX and/or Linux.

    I've already moved the other PC's in the house - those used by my wife and son - to Ubuntu. Regardless of the OS - XP or Ubuntu - all PCs are running Open Office, Firefox, etc.

    I mention Ubuntu for a reason - its the strongest Linux desktop OS that I've encountered thusfar, easy to install, and easy for non-techies (like my wife) to manage on their own (download/install other apps, configure ones already running, use peripheral devices, use already installed apps for communication/productivity, etc.).

    1. Re:Windows XP is my last Microsoft OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't purchase Vista, nor will I purchase a PC if I am forced to take it with Vista on it.

      Yeah, yeah, sure. Ok.

      I said the same thing about win98. Especially after getting used to Mandrake. But a new bunch of parts (probably mostly the video) made Mandrake (or any other distro, it seemed) impossible to run.

      Then my daughter played a Sony-BMG CD on it, and it ruined all my sound recording software.

      I'd lost the disks for the video and sound, and there weren't any win98 versions on the web.

      I almost bought a Mac Mini, but cursed a bit and got XP.

      This was a few months ago. I'm still getting over it.

    2. Re:Windows XP is my last Microsoft OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you should have removed win98.

      Anyway win xp will be my last windows as well. As long as it'll be usable i'll keep it, but if it breaks or becomes obsolete I'll just delete it. I spend hardly anytime on xp anyway, just when I want to play around with java as I haven't taken the time to fix that in ubuntu yet. For everything else I use Ubuntu.

    3. Re:Windows XP is my last Microsoft OS by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      XP is my last MS OS.

      I've transitioned 100% to SuSE and OS X. OS X on laptops, SuSE on desktop.

      Windows is dead in my house/company.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  45. re: biology? by fury88 · · Score: 1

    Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology.

    How did you end up in IT then?

  46. Microsoft execs talked about "Impacting People" by joss · · Score: 1

    Impact me harder baby

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  47. MOD PARENT UP by zerojoker · · Score: 1

    haven't read someting funny like this for a long time

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Da Parent is da genius !! Loooved it.

  48. IBM's new ad by SCO+STINKS · · Score: 0

    Asta la Vista to windows baby!

    --
    Reason #32767 not to use VB6: Integers are 2 bytes... Think about it!
  49. "Microsoft can't afford to screw up like this" by FridayBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But, of course they can! They're a monopoly, and there's nothing that Steve Jobs, the Open Source community or anybody else can do about it (well, the US Justice Dept. tried before Bush stopped 'em).

    Unfortunately, Microsoft's customers (i.e. most of the world) are willing to wait a really long time before they give up on the Redmond giant. It's that damned critical mass that they've built up over the years: everything's geared to supporting Windows before anything else, from hardware manufacturers to ISVs to ISPs to media companies, etc. Even Google doesn't support anything but Windows for Google Earth! (okay, there's a Mac beta for it now too, but you get my drift).

    Therefore, I figure that Microsoft's monopoly position can only be threatened if one of their next new operating systems turns out to be a total failure. If Microsoft aren't able to dump it and replace it soon enough with something better, only then will significant numbers of their customers begin to loose faith in them and move on to alternative operating systems.

    Let's hope Vista turns out to be that dog.

    1. Re:"Microsoft can't afford to screw up like this" by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Therefore, I figure that Microsoft's monopoly position can only be threatened if one of their next new operating systems turns out to be a total failure. Not really. If the costs to businesses of retraining all their users to use Vista exceeds the costs to businesses of retraining all their users to use Linux, then Microsoft's monopoly position would be threatened. The secret to unseating MS then, is to create a Window manager that is indistiguisable from XP, as well as apps that provide ALL the functionality Windows users are used to having... e.g. solataire, minesweeper, notepad...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:"Microsoft can't afford to screw up like this" by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      Good point, although I was thinking more about users in general than business users in particular. Furthermore, those costs you mention will also include retraining (or replacing) the sysadmins and other support staff (unless you consider most Windows administrators to just be users with extra privileges).

  50. LaTeX by jefu · · Score: 1
    Indeed. And for most things it would take less time to do and look better.

    But there are so many forces working against it. Steep learning curve. So many documents shipped out for modification already in MS Office format. So many people that require you send them documents in MS Office format.

    1. Re:LaTeX by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree, I'm not naive. For my documents I use the tools that work for me which usually include tetex. At work I do whatever my boss wants me to do. For most documents I write for work they're not big enough [or public enough] that presentation matters to me.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  51. Boy, that's a worthless summary. by massysett · · Score: 1

    But, on the flipside, it must mean that commenters actually RTFA!

  52. Why people won't switch ? by S3D · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA:
    It's amazing, but people will wait months and months for products that are so complicated that no ordinary person can figure out how to use them.

    Let me tell you big secret: Most people don't want to switch. They hate to have to learn a new system, new UI and new buttons. It's bad enough as it is. Think about 60 years old, who is struggling with office, e-mail and web, and calling his/her free tech-support(children) whenver he/she accidentally minimize window. Those people stay with XP as long as MS provide minimal support, that is fixing exploits. And may be even longer. So many people are actually happy of Vista delay, as long as it means longer support for XP. It would be even betted if Vista cancelled at all.
    1. Re:Why people won't switch ? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is bullshit. I've tested this myself, multiple times.

      Take a computer luddite who's semi-used to Windows XP. I don't mean this in a cruel way, but my father (a brilliant post-doc organic chemist), my gf's mom (also smart), my grandma, and our secretary have all been switched to OS X.

      They became proficient within a month or so, at a higher level than their ability to use Windows after _years_ of usage.

      Windows is a UI nightmare. Windows is not intuitive or easy to use.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  53. People in Microsoft not even ready for it any more by Been+on+TV · · Score: 1

    It was an interesting read, the comments on Mini Microsoft the other day when it was made public that Vista was delayed once more. What is the difference between Mac OS X and Vista? Microsoft employees are excited about Mac OS X! was one of the comments.

    What is even more interesting is that there might be a connection between Apple pushing their World Wide Developer Conference back to September and the new delivery date of Vista. Too close in time for Microsoft to be comfortable in the chance of having Vista look like a silly copy of Mac OS X 10.4 after Mac OS X 10.5 was introduced. More on the story in my blog entry written a couple of days ago.

    --
    The future is in beta
  54. giving the other OS's another chance by QAChaos · · Score: 1

    The author states that now the alternative operating systems now have their chance to try to topple microsoft but really what has any of the linux ditributions tried to do with the time between XP and vista? The only company I think that has taken the opportunity is apple where they first implement features that rival vista into OS X and then switch their entire line over to intel while microsoft is just trying to put out an OS. I guess Sun came out with backend stuff (zones, janus) and open sourced their os.

  55. Get it fixed, fool. by repetty · · Score: 1

    So your computer is broken. Get it fixed, already.

  56. First Rule of Forbes by nightsweat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You DO NOT TALK about Forbes. Second rule, well you can guess.

    Forbes is responsible for more wrong-headed ideas about technology in the executive suites than any other publication. Pay them no heed. Ignore them. They do not have a clue.

    They may even be right this time, but that wouldn't make up for the multitude of times they've made technologists lives worse.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:First Rule of Forbes by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      While true, they are what a lot of top company execs read, and if they are ridiculing Vista it doesn't bode well for Microsoft.

  57. Apple by Reapman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To be perfectly honest, next time my parents need to upgrade, which won't be for awhile, if things don't change it's going to be Apple products... tired of providing tech support for stupid things, while Apple's seem to just work, and just work right. Even simple stuff like sharing a printer seems to be nothing but a headache in Windows. Who knows, my dad need's Office for compatability with his clients, but maybe I should look at CrossOver or whatever the Wine port for Office is and have them run a locked down version of Linux.

    1. Re:Apple by tsaler · · Score: 1

      Or Office:mac. Why use some second-rate suite when the genuine article is available?

  58. Perspective by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

    Unix and its variants cater to the technical minded people. Written by programmers for programmers. For example well behaved programs don't babble on success, very terse documentation geared towards like minded people who know and are willing to research concepts further. A technically superior product for people that program and maintain networked systems and infrastructures..

    Windows has a different value system. Windows caters to the non-technical minded people like the average Joe Sixpack, Grandma, etc. For example, user feedback by dialog boxes and progress indicators to let Grandma know the "doo-hickey" she clicked on will eventually open her e-mail, plus knows the average Joe will not read help page after help page for the most part so documentation is geared towards people who won't remember the contents of the previous page of information. A technically superior product for the average person with no technical computer skills that are task oriented.

    To say Vista is "not people ready" would indeed be a true statement if security and stability are at the core of Vista unlike any other attempt Microsoft as made. To put it simply you can't have Windows with Unix power and vice versa without compromising some of the core principles of where these platforms came from. An example is the MacOS X - they have taken parts of Unix and meshed with the working parts of Windows excluding the suck parts of Unix and Windows; but it doesn't behave like either to the Unix power user nor to the Windows power user.

    This is the biggest challenge Microsft faces now with healthy competition. If Joe Six pack and Grandma have to get smarter then why wouldn't they consider Macs or some Unix variant at some point? Reminds me a lot of how AOL works in conjunction with people as they "mature" about internet usage...

    --
    BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
    1. Re:Perspective by distilledprodigy · · Score: 0

      I like Microsoft, but I'd like to add my two cents... In my opinion, Microsoft has the market-- and will for about another 8-10 years. At this point, the people who grew up with computers and know computers (forced to use it in school) will be more capable of a move to alternatives and will be at the right age and income bracket on a large scale.

      Pretty much anyone 40+ that don't use computers at work only use it for email, and right now all the 40+ people know or care about is Windows.

    2. Re:Perspective by smash · · Score: 1
      Windows has a different value system. Windows caters to the non-technical minded people like the average Joe Sixpack, Grandma, etc. For example, user feedback by dialog boxes and progress indicators to let Grandma know the "doo-hickey" she clicked on will eventually open her e-mail, plus knows the average Joe will not read help page after help page for the most part so documentation is geared towards people who won't remember the contents of the previous page of information. A technically superior product for the average person with no technical computer skills that are task oriented.

      Thing is dude... that joe sixpack, grandma, etc just call someone else if their computer pops up a box they haven't seen before, before even reading it.

      As for online help pages... now you're really dreaming - I don't believe any of my 400 or so users even know the help system exists.

      Given that a tech will be setting everything up in any case, I'm all for a more "tech friendly" O/S.

      And as far as end-users go - if it only pops up a box when something fucks up, all the better... they'll just call me about it anyway.

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Perspective by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

      "Thing is dude" - how have you said anything I haven't already? Your comment was pretty much my point. My apologies if I am missing yours.

      --
      BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
    4. Re:Perspective by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

      I personally do not care for Microsoft BUT I think it serves a purpose*

      "will be more capable of a move to alternatives and will be at the right age and income bracket on a large scale."

      I am unable to parse this statement as a whole, moving on...

      "Pretty much anyone 40+ that don't use computers at work only use it for email, and right now all the 40+ people know or care about is Windows."

      I will not pick a nit other than to say that you can remove the "40+" and regex it with "average computer user or below" and be even more accurate.

      *As a programmer, I do not care for Microsoft's platform and would be glad to school you on any underlying platform technologies that have been pushed by Microsoft, pick your poison for debate. Sorry, I don't see innovation on a technical level from the company in general as a whole but I am impressed in other aspects of Microsofts achievments, namely market/business, copius blunders and uncanny ablitity to recover and still be able to throw around a word like innovative. That being said I am thankful that Microsoft is around to cater to all my friends, family, and customers who aren't like me or my peers that I am impressed with.

      --
      BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
  59. So Linux is simpler to use?!? WTF?!?!? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    products that are so complicated that no ordinary person can figure out how to use them.

    So he's advocating the use of Linux in one breath, then complaining about how complicated Windows is for ordinary users in the next? He must not have much experience with Linux if he thinks it will SIMPLIFY things for Windows users.

    I can hear it now: "Don't worry grandma, this will be an easy fix compared to that complicated old Windows. Now let's start by un-taring your source, recompiling your kernel, and compiling new modules. What distro are you using, grandma?"

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  60. Article Made Me Laugh A Little by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Opinion pieces like this crack me up.

    This dude hides nothing about being anti-MS, which is fine by me. I've got a bazillion reasons to be annoyed with MS. What I am amazed by is how he, in not so many words, just does not get why the masses aren't rising up to CRUSH MICROSOFT (emphasis his)! Where's the righteous rage, where are the sit-ins and love-ins and the fuming invective and the placards and the riots?! Kill the monster! Kill the monster!

    I dunno, maybe we're not as angry as he is. Maybe we don't want to crush Microsoft. I know that's hard to believe, but it's an operating system, not a political stand.

    1. Re:Article Made Me Laugh A Little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last couple of paras were a "rise up and unite" style, but the rest of it was just calling all the MS *severely* OTT marketing shit for the shit that it is.

      Marketing speak has always been there - but they really are going past anything sensible now, and I am glad to see the press starting to have a go at the doublespeak shit. "people ready" what a load of junk - the dos prompt was "people ready".

    2. Re:Article Made Me Laugh A Little by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "This dude hides nothing about being anti-MS"

      You're an idiot.

      This is DANIEL LYONS! He has written more hate pieces against Linux and OSS than Rob Enderle.

      He is a KNOWN MICROSOFT SHILL! If HE hates Vista, Microsoft is fucked.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  61. Boy, you got my number! by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    *lays on the long sofa and closes his eyes*

    I keep having this dream where I'm standing up and towering over Redmond, WA and I'm just ... just ... urinating all over it. I know it sounds gross and I don't know why it's happening, I just keep going and laughing the whole time.

    Maybe you can help me with this, it gets really confusing now. My sisters are seated at computers. And when they touch them, they turn into toilets full of excrement--not working at all. But as I walk down the line, my mere touch turns them into golden Alienware desktops running at the speed of light. They get on their knees and start to worship me and again I'm laughing maniacly.

    I know this sounds kind of gross and I have issues, but what does it all mean, doc?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Boy, you got my number! by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      The world is ending.

      Dell just bought Alienware.

      While I'm here, I noticed your reference to the author's comments about Apple. Personally, I think they should have been higher up in the article, together with his ruminations on Linux, because Apple's a far better solution for most consumers in my view thanks to the availability of solid, high-quality commercial software like Office and the iLife/iWork suite.

      And I don't have any Apple stock. Wish I did :-).

      D

    2. Re:Boy, you got my number! by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you can help me with this, it gets really confusing now. My sisters are seated at computers. And when they touch them, they turn into toilets full of excrement--not working at all. But as I walk down the line, my mere touch turns them into golden Alienware desktops running at the speed of light. They get on their knees and start to worship me and again I'm laughing maniacly.

      I know this sounds kind of gross and I have issues, but what does it all mean, doc?


      Ah, yes. Excrement that turns into gold. This a dream motif commonly seen in the anal-expulsive personality type, which as we all know is characterized by high levels of conceit and ambition. This should, I believe, be watched closely. We should consider increasing the frequency of our sessions to twice a week (at the normal rate of course), for is not unusal for these tendencies to grow into an intractable and malignant narcissism.

      For a fascinating example of a parallel case in which the same dream motif if found, see the case study of "Bill G." published in a recent Zeitschrift der Analyse von Träumen. The details of this case are an extreme example, it is true, nonetheless it is well that they should give us pause.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  62. Steve is definitely the man now. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    With support from Tommy, Steve is the man now, dog.

  63. I am glad that they... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    If Microsoft is "People Ready", then I am the King of India. I am glad that they suggest, at the very bottom of the article, to get a Mac. I remember back in, oh, 1997 or so, that I didn't like Macs at all and cringed at the idea of having to use one. There wasn't even a command line for crying out loud!

    Then OS X came out. And it improved. And improved. Today, it is a beautiful and wonderfully designed system. Easy to use, powerful, and if you want to get down and dirty with UNIX, it's there, too. They did a spectacular job on that software.

    And I bought a few Macs. But what ultimately prevented me from switching all my systems? Lack of availability of VMware on the Mac. This was due to VMware being a virtualizer, not an emulator, so it can't run x86 programs on those G4 processors. So here I was, using Linux and FreeBSD, running VMware on Linux, and not switching to the Mac, which I like better for its user interface and overall experience.

    But now they've switched to x86. Quite frankly, there should be no reason within the next year to switch to the Mac. I'm sure there will be a native VMware soon, as they'd be crazy to ignore the market for that. And I'm sure that many of the "big apps" that we use here at work will become available on the Mac, because more people than ever are asking for them. It's only a matter of Mac gaining a critical mass of market share, and then Microsoft will fall. And their "people ready" garbage that I'm so sick of using will be lost to the ether forever, and good riddance.

  64. Austin Powers, trolling? by pokopoko3k · · Score: 1

    haha, you don't sound very convincing when you can't even get the name of the computer right. no, Austin, MiniMe is your other nemesis.
    reset memory? what are you talking about? kill hung programs with opt-cmd-esc, not any harder than the Windows ctrl-alt-delete is it? and it shouldn't be needed very often. and when it is needed, it shouldn't affect anything else.
    anyway, if you are actually for real and not just trolling, you should have your computer looked at. though first off i'd recommend starting from your install disk and running disk utility. all computers need this kind of thing periodically... not just Macs.

    --
    there is only the door, the door, the door.
    1. Re:Austin Powers, trolling? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      "reset memory? what are you talking about?"

      1) Got brand new MiniMac
      2) Accidentally ran some cheesy flying dinosaur game
      3) When I tried to exit the program, the computer froze hard
      4) None of the magic key combos worked, so I hard booted
      5) When the computer restarted, it literally blue-screened after the sign on screen tried to draw
      6) After surfing the forums, one of the recommendations to get past the MiniMac blue screen of death was to reset some memory cache - that's the "reset memory" I'm talking about.

      "kill hung programs with opt-cmd-esc, not any harder than the Windows ctrl-alt-delete is it?"

      It's a little harder. Under Windows, you can pop up the task manager from the bottom bar using a right-click; you don't need to use CTRL-ALT-DELETE anymore to kill program. I thought it was significant because my last Mac (with a previous cut of OS X) and its programs were so stable that I nearly forgot about opt-cmd-esc and friends.

    2. Re:Austin Powers, trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you call it a MiniMac God kills a kitten. It's Mac Mini kitten hater.

    3. Re:Austin Powers, trolling? by guet · · Score: 1

      You have a hardware problem - just send the machine back already.

    4. Re:Austin Powers, trolling? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "2) Accidentally ran some cheesy flying dinosaur game"

      Well, that explains you - it's called "operator error."

      There's NO operating system so good that some moron can't destroy it by writing absolutely braindead code.

      Here's a clue. Don't run software that you haven't heard of someone else running it successfully on your system first.

      Let someone else be the moron who gets a fried machine.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  65. Obligatory children song quote by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    All empires ...fall.

    *ahem*
    The Longhorn bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down...

  66. That's okay by aevans · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So Vista won't be ready for another year. Or two. Or three. Novell Netware lost the race to a vaporware NT5, but it was Linux and then Active Directory that killed it. Microsoft has a habit of delivering late, and poorly. But they are bringing onnovation to the (mainstream) desktop. Yes, Unix is a better architecture. But Windows is so much more featureful than Gnome, KDE, or *especally* Mac OS X. Office is 10 years ahead of any of it's clones. Granted, the main reason Star Office is so far behind is because most of their energy is spent on compatibility. But they shouldn't worry too much about it. Like Word Perfect shouldn't have. Microsoft saw a collaboration suite where everyone else saw desktop publishing. Office 2003 is a credible competitor to the browser for application development. With a growing .NET library and the push to port decent scripting languages (like python & php5) to the CLR, it's a compelling platform. Infopath is the new Visual Basic form, only backed by SQL Server and XML instead of Access. I'm not praising MS unconditionally. They still have weird, arcane ways of doing things. And lots and lots of bugs -- and security issues. But they're offering more in functionality than anyone else. Ajax isn't a competitor to OLE. I'm simply noting that unless an *alternative* to MS Office integration is offered, alot of open source zealots (like myself) will be switching over. I'd love to see an open source web framework tied to Windows and Office automation, but I don't see it happening. I wrote a list of Microsoft technologies I'd need to learn to be as productive as I am using open source. It was a long list and it was ugly, too, with words like "Exchange", "IIS", and "VBA" on it. I don't want to learn to use Active Directory (but at least it's not NT Domain Controllers), and it is a pretty good LDAP server, too. I don't want to learn VB, VB.net, and C#. (and maybe I won't have to, at least no more than necessary to translate api's to Python or Ruby.) But Office and Exchange are unmatched in the open source world, and there's really not a reason they should be.

    1. Re:That's okay by brufar · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness OSS doesn't emulate Exchange.. My Linux mail server has up-times exceeding a year (would be longer but our company moved) while I know several individuals that are running Exchange and well.. they WISH they had the stability and uptime my system has.. They told me as much as they were busy restoring the system, or when they got back on-line after the Exchange server went down for the 10th time in two months.. Glad they are a MS Enterprise customer with support.. heh Two other admins I know, manage nothing but MS Exchange Full-Time and they both work at the same company.

      I'm certainly NOT jealous of Exchange.. Plenty happy to use a different product to handle groupware functionality and email.

      Yes I run mostly Windows Servers, but not for a function as critical as email.. I simply don't have that much time to spend coddling a mail server.

      --
      far...out
    2. Re:That's okay by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      The more people that develop buggy, slow, insecure, non-upgradeable & unmaintainable "applications" in Office, the more people will realize they shouldn't have paid their cousin to develop an app just because he could write a web page. This translates into dollars for me and my team, who have cleaned up such a mess on more than one occasion. Unfortunately, the price tag for this tends to be rather high, especially when compared to "pay me $500 and I'll do it" that he's getting from his brother-in-law (who inevitably divorces and leaves the business high and dry).

      So, good luck with all that. Send me an email when you realize you've coded yourself into a corner because you run into a security problem or you're out of resources because Outlook is hogging them all...guess I'll see you on The Daily WTF sometime soon.

      Oh, Windows more featureful than OS X? "Ajax isn't a competitor to OLE?" Nice try. And you call yourself an open source "zealot." Whatever.

    3. Re:That's okay by daern · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness OSS doesn't emulate Exchange.. My Linux mail server has up-times exceeding a year (would be longer but our company moved) while I know several individuals that are running Exchange and well.. they WISH they had the stability and uptime my system has.. They told me as much as they were busy restoring the system, or when they got back on-line after the Exchange server went down for the 10th time in two months.. Glad they are a MS Enterprise customer with support.. heh Two other admins I know, manage nothing but MS Exchange Full-Time and they both work at the same company. I'm certainly NOT jealous of Exchange.. Plenty happy to use a different product to handle groupware functionality and email. Yes I run mostly Windows Servers, but not for a function as critical as email.. I simply don't have that much time to spend coddling a mail server.

      IME, EX2003 is exceedingly stable when managed by compentent admins. Unfortunately, few Windows admins are... :-(

      I have never had to reboot Ex2003 to fix it. In fact, it's never gone wrong in the 2 years since we migrated from Ex5.5. Oh, and that didn't go wrong either, but it did take much more effort to keep it that way.

      Exchange really isn't a bad product. Remember that 90% of the anti-MS crowd on this website have never managed Exchange in an enterprise environment ;-)

    4. Re:That's okay by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used OS X? Or KDE? Or GNOME for that matter? Windows is significantly behind all of them in terms of usability features. Have you recently tried any of the open source office software? You mentioned Star Office - ever hear of open office?

      I use NeoOffice (a Mac port of open office) on OS X and I've never had to look back.

    5. Re:That's okay by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      Anything declared as "Enterprise" that runs on the JET database engine meets the definition of a "bad" product.

    6. Re:That's okay by daern · · Score: 1

      Anything declared as "Enterprise" that runs on the JET database engine meets the definition of a "bad" product. Not if it works...

  67. Re:Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketin by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    "Windows Vista -- A Powerful Combination Of Combined Powers"

    A phrase which relates Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer and Captain Planet CANNOT POSSIBLY be any good.

  68. Curious by JazzLad · · Score: 0

    A fellow geek posts about his three sisters and no one asked if they were hot/available/would settle for a pathetic nerd that lives in his parents' basement

    You know at lease 80% of readers imediately thought at least one of those questions.

    ---
    If you didn't chuckle, you work too hard.

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  69. It's called Disclosure by rsborg · · Score: 1
    It's usually considered to be a conflict of interest. That's fine for you to do it, but generally journalist (in as much as this guy is a journalist at all, he mostly writes trash for Forbes) are supposed to refrain from it. Not required by law I don't think, just an ethical/professional thing.

    It's not required to be divested of any such "conflicts", you just have to be open about them. It's called disclosure, and allows people to determine your biases as a source (every source is biased, it's unavoidable). Sometimes people state very clearly that they have no related biases, and this done to make it clear that there is no relation.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:It's called Disclosure by avdp · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't think anything is legally required at all. It's just something a good journalist won't do, write commentaries on companies they have a vested interest in. Some people consider disclosure a good enough ethical "loophole" to allow such behavior, others don't.

  70. I've got one word: by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 2, Funny

    Daikavista.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
  71. social networking by writertype · · Score: 1

    You've never used LinkedIn, have you? I'm "colleagues" with a yak herder in Siberia.

  72. Re:Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Windows Vista -- Or I'll f'n kill you, too!"

  73. So I guess you're saying ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Funny
    This a dream motif commonly seen in the anal-expulsive personality type...
    So you're saying I spew bullshit?

    Dumb it down for me, doc, I'm a freaking Slashdot poster for Christ's sake!
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:So I guess you're saying ... by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, I see our time is up. You can leave your chargeplate with my receptionist.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  74. Wait! I need help! by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
    Ah, I see our time is up. You can leave your chargeplate with my receptionist.
    Noooooo! No! You haven't answered anything!

    I have so many questions! Why can't I hold a stable relationship with a female?! Why do I organize my compact discs by increasing Fourier coefficients modeled from their music? Why do I wake up crying every night? Why do people call me "an engineer" and how can I cure myself of this horrible affliction?

    Help me doc, you've got to help me! My life (or lack thereof) is falling apart!
    --
    My work here is dung.
  75. Dan Quayle is writing Microsoft PR copy now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHaHahahaha. I wondered what he was doing lately.

    1. Re:Dan Quayle is writing Microsoft PR copy now by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      I would've guessed Harlan McCraney.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
  76. Wow! by Horatio_Hellpop · · Score: 1

    I use XP Pro daily, and am (mostly) satsified with MS products ... but that article made me laugh out loud. And ... hmmm ... maybe I should investigate Linux more thoroughly ...

    --
    Frammin' on the jim-jam, frippin' at the krotz!
  77. Apple really isn't taking the advantage by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    Apple isn't as my boss would say "thinking big enough". Microsoft has provided plenty of opportunities for Apple to step in and offer a better solution. But, Apple for one is protecting large margins that limits them to market to businesses. They don't offer cheap no frills systems that businesses would like. So, Mac OS X can never make an impact even though it is arguably better than XP and way ahead of Vista. Moreover, OS X can't be showcase to people at their work because business won't adopt it. So, they will lose out on an opportunity to market to consumers as well and, consequently, not be able to push their market share up. Apple should despite it logic think about partnering with Dell to offer Mac OS X business solutions. They are not going to sell PowerMac or Powerbooks to businesses, so why not test the waters of a software only business solution. A lot of companies make money this way.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  78. Inertia by Kelson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It all comes down to the fact that most people would rather stick with the inconvenience they know than risk starting over on something that might not be worth the effort.

    In other words, whatever they're switching from has to get really bad, and whatever they're switching to has to offer a major improvement.

    You could look at it in terms of neophobes and neophiles, or the devil you know vs. the devil you don't know, or just plain inertia.

  79. MOD FUNNY by javaxman · · Score: 1
    I have no mod points to offer, wasted them all yesterday, but somehow that struck me so funny I can hardly see.

    Thank you, clickety6. How I didn't think of that myself, I'll never know. Frickin' Borg indeed.

  80. Re:Wait! I need help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Why can't I hold a stable relationship with a female?!

    Because you post on Slashdot.

  81. Re:Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketin by tbone1 · · Score: 1

    "Windows Vista - because if you can't trust convicted monopolists with the ethics of a Chicago ward-heeler, who can you trust?"

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  82. Windows Vista Forever by Drunkulus · · Score: 1


    They are switching to the Unreal engine?

  83. Not in Microsoft's view by hey! · · Score: 1

    New vocabulary word for today: teleology: Belief in the idea that history or nature has a purpose towards which it progresses.

    Back in the late 1980s, the hottest new technology was the relational database, which had just barely begun to be usable. Utopia was in the air. Soon, everything an organization did would raptured up into New Jerusalem of seamless data integration.

    Many of us who passed through that millenial hysteria have seen its dark side: useful projects stalled indefinitely as organizations were seduced by the vision of an all encompassing union of systems, a blessed state in which somehow we will be washed clean of all our porblems. The mechanism by which this would happen was somewhat vague, being far in the distance and bathed by the blinding radiance of synergy. But the road in front of them was clear and they set their feet on it, resolutely denying the temptations of opportunism.

    Those of us for whom this vision is no longer our polestar, we who live in a world of practical trade offs and time dependent opportunities, we are apostates. But others have never lost faith. Their spiritual home is Microsoft. Microsoft has a teleolgoical view. They are convinced that they will overcome, because while the technological arc of the universe is long, it tends towards integration. This framework justifies their existence and everything they do becomes not only a moral right, but a positive duty.

    In this framework, a mere invention isn't an innovation, unless it somehow, in itself, brings us closer to the world of seamleslly integrated data.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  84. Anyone ? by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    Can anyone supply a single link to a positive review of Microsoft technology from Forbes ?

    How those guys manage to maintain their position as informative, insightful, industry analysts when they bag out Microsoft for 10 years and yet to date they're phenomenally successful and yet they still predict doom for them. I think I'll make a prediction here and say Forbes is pretty much irrelevant when it's so clearly incapable of being impartial.

  85. Not the richest in world... Lookup Rothschild... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  86. Wrong by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Microsoft can't afford to screw up like this. There are free alternatives to everything Microsoft sells, like the Linux operating system and the Open Office application suite. Rivals like Novell (nasdaq: NOVL - news - people ), Red Hat (nasdaq: RHAT - news - people ), Sun Microsystems (nasdaq: SUNW - news - people ) and, yes, IBM are pushing those programs big time.
    Except for the first sentence, that makes no sense. These "free alternatives" have been trying to capture the market for years now, with almost no luck. Microsoft's competition isn't Sun or Red Hat or Novell or IBM. It's their own "obsolete" software. If Vista is as bad as it seems to be, than people will simply refrain from upgrading, or insist on using XP on their new hardware. Which will certainly hurt Microsft, but not do anything to cure the appalling monoculture in the end-user software market.
  87. What happened to the "old" Lyons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the same guy who said "what SCO wants, SCO gets"? Isn't this the same guy who told all the Linux "crunchies" to get a life? Isn't this the same guy who wrote an entire series of pro-SCO articles? What credibility does he have even mentioning Linux in a favorable light now, after all that bashing?

    This guy's such a waffler I'm surprised no one's thrown a bottle of Mrs. Butterworth's at him.

    1. Re:What happened to the "old" Lyons? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      This is exactly my point. Daniel Lyons is a known MS shill - he HATES Linux and OSS.

      For him to write this piece means either someone at MS screwed him over and he's getting payback, or MS has really screwed up big time with Vista.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  88. Offtopic: by GypC · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does Steve Ballmer look exactly like... Satan!?

  89. Lyons has a long history of saying... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    ...whatever Microsoft wants him to say. And in fact, this article is written to look unbiased and maybe pokes at MS just a bit, but really just repeats the same crap. He's also the journalist who found nothing wrong with Sara Radicatti's group making predictions the same way and calling them unbiased, then astroturfing their own article in the blogsphere.

    I won't even open the Forbes website any more. The last time I did, was to count how many blocked ads there were once I'd installed a dns based ad-blocker. It was 36 on the home page.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:Lyons has a long history of saying... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      This stuff does NOT sound like stuff Microsoft wants him to say:

      Worst of all, I can't believe Microsoft actually held this big nonevent "event" only a few days before announcing another screw-up in Vista. If Ballmer knew he was about to announce a delay and still had this event, he's crazy. If he didn't know Vista was about to slip again, then Microsoft is in worse shape than anyone realizes.

      Microsoft can't afford to screw up like this. There are free alternatives to everything Microsoft sells, like the Linux operating system and the Open Office application suite. Rivals like Novell (nasdaq: NOVL - news - people ), Red Hat (nasdaq: RHAT - news - people ), Sun Microsystems (nasdaq: SUNW - news - people ) and, yes, IBM are pushing those programs big time.

      Given Microsoft's delays I can't believe open-source stuff still hasn't caught on for desktop computers. It's amazing, but people will wait months and months for products that are so complicated that no ordinary person can figure out how to use them.

      Why not at least switch to an Apple Computer (nasdaq: AAPL - news - people ) Mac? Apple's new operating system is stable, reliable and easy to use. The applications are simple, gorgeous and work well together. And they're here. Today. Steve Jobs must be waking up a happy man this morning.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:Lyons has a long history of saying... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I've been pointing out here.

      Lyons is a known MS shill. He hates Linux and OSS.

      For him to write this about MS means either someone at MS screwed him over and he's getting payback, or MS has really screwed up with Vista and he's decided to blow the whistle for some reason.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  90. wrong-o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Industrial/factory sewing machines and fabric cutters/makers, etc are highly computerized,(You should see some of them, I used to work the "Bobbin" tradeshow, it is googleable) and most even entry level home machines are computerized and programmable now. I just bought one for GF last Christmas binge buying season, it has a PC interface. Only the very cheapest bottom rung machines *aren't* programmable now.

  91. Re:Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketin by smoker2 · · Score: 1
    Or -

    "Windows Vista -- It just works"
    "Windows Vista -- Heh heh"
    "Windows Vista -- What choice have you got ?"
    "Windows Vista -- Where do you think you're going ?"

  92. Forbes criticizing M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not shilling for them? Who said pigs aren't aerodynamically designed?

  93. LOL by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    That article was a Chuck Norris/Jack Bauer/Superman Smackdown....

    --
    MadOgre.com
  94. "Let's take my three sisters" by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1
    Let's take my three sisters. Each has a degree in biology.
    And you actually expected anyone here to read beyond those two sentences and not go into a quick Bathroom Recess?

    You are a far more imaginative (and brave) man than I am, Sir!
    --
    sig? Oh, that sig...
  95. ALL promotional buzz is BS by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    ... and expecting otherwise is the real travesty. I've always kind of thought we just kind of patted promotion on the head and said "how precocious", you know annoying, but of no real substance. Some people actually buy this, though. Yikes.

  96. ironic... by the.o.ster.66 · · Score: 1
    "The new programs are phenomenally complex, with scores of buttons and pull-down menus and myriad connections among various applications."

    kinda like the forbes webpage? if you can only fit an average of 6 words per line, you have too much crap.

  97. just wait by omaigad · · Score: 1

    yea sure M$oft is evil ... but somehow most of us and i mean MOST is using it ... and there is nothing we can do... why ? lets get back to these tree sisters example: would you like explain to women how to use linux or try to explain them how to update drivers through phone, or you would prefer try to do that on windows ? fasion designer ? dont tell me that coders can actualy make good UI for every new user around ? and let me hmz werent there same buzz about winxp and its design ? stop it and lets just w8 for finished product ...

  98. When you combine people and technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination."

      The Borg No?

      You will be assimilated. Eventualy.

  99. Agreed, this time he's spewing non-news that's... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    ..not directly geared toward Microsoft's message. That's not going to come close to making him or anything he writes worth my respect.

    Maybe he just likes dumping on as many products as possible. His "Linux is for loosers" article sure was a brilliant piece of journalistic skill -- oh, no, wait a minute, I'm confusing it with journalism. I mean to say a steaming pile of shit.

    Ref:

    http://wiki.vowe.org/DanLyons

    http://www.rhs.com/web/blog/poweroftheschwartz.nsf /d6plinks/RSCZ-6DFH52
    http://www.billbuchan.com/web.nsf/d6plinks/DOMM-6J E5ER

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  100. Read the Dan Lyons wiki before you buy his crap by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Maybe he just likes dumping on as many products as possible. His "Linux is for loosers" article sure was a brilliant piece of journalistic skill -- oh, no, wait a minute, I'm confusing it with journalism. I mean to say a steaming pile of shit.

    The Dan Lyons wiki

    Ref: http://wiki.vowe.org/DanLyons

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  101. Kids are the solution by shotfeel · · Score: 1

    Just have a kid or three.

    Then when someone calls for tech support, say "Let me get my calendar and see when I can come over and help you out. BTW, can you babysit for me on...."

    No more tech support. But then there's "child support".

    On second thought, just help them out and be happy!

  102. Why is it called Vista ? by codeDr · · Score: 1

    Why is the new Windows version called Vista ???
    ...
    Because its always in the distance!

  103. ugh! by 3dvideo · · Score: 0

    I'm really looking forward to all the DRM implementations in vista ick!

    Photo Journal of my animal interactions

    --
    stereoscopic multimedia pioneer view3d.tv
  104. Slashdot 101 by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    Time to burn a little karma. So far 50% of the replies to my original post have attacked my sig as opposed to commenting on the post. Strangely enough, both of the off-topic posts complaining about my sig were from liberals who objected to the content of the sig. Of the two posts that actually had anything to say about the content of my post, neither of them had anything to do with Dan Lyons and whether he should be listened to or not either. But at least they were commenting on the content.

    Come on folks. Most signatures are just lame attempts to be funny with a few political comments (like mine) that may or amy not overlap the commedy category. They are analogous to and about as deep as bumper stickers. Ignore sigs and reply to the post content.

    BTW, for news I usually go to http://news.bbc.uk.co/ (international version). Tends to have a lot less noise in either direction than U.S. newsertainment outlets and a lot better depth.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  105. Re:Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketin by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Lawyer: Patents!
    Marketing: FUD!
    MS Research: Interesting yet utterly useless innovation that will never ever be used anywhere!
    Bill: Money!
    Steve: Chair!

    Captain Vista By your combined powers I am Captain Vista 2007 Professional World Edition!

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  106. Re:Other "Vista" slogans considered by MS marketin by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Windows Vista - It Just Works (in the next service pack, trust us!)

    Windows Vista - It's Secure (Only the NSA has the key! You trust Bush, don't you?)

    Windows Vista - Are You People Ready (for the ass-raping we're going to give you?)

    Windows Vista - The Road Ahead (Where Linux will make us road-kill!)

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  107. BUG! a BUG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh, it's a bug.

  108. Fast forward to sometime in 2007... by Javaman59 · · Score: 0

    Vista has been released. It looks great, and is stable and secure. It's shipping in huge numbers. The server edition continues to increase Microsoft's share of that market. Programmers everywhere are using .Net.

    --
    I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  109. I'm a programmer and even I don't want to do that! by sauge · · Score: 1

    Sheesh! All you got to do is write perl script! Edit text files and end up with a PDF! I can see explaining that to the marketing people in my company.

  110. Banality packaged as profundity by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    When you combine people and technology, you have a very powerful combination." Think about that. Just let it sink in for a minute

    This is so banal it's ludicrous. I mean, what about all that technology that just comes into being without people, huh? This is a typical example of trotting out a "celeb" (I use the word in its loosest sense) who spouts some garbage and all the people are meant to go "oh wow, man, that's so deeeep!!!". C'mon, won't somebody stick their hand up and say the emperor's got no clothes? It's just another tech gadget that really nobody needs, actually doesn't do a whole lot more that the old version doesn't do, and if it weren't for the godawful mess that the old version actually is, with all its spyware and viruses and bugs, nobody would give a flying fuck about.

  111. Graaaarrrgh... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    This must be something known amongst Slashdotters, then, because you act like it is common knowledge, but I'm afraid I didn't get the memo and I do more during the day than surf for the latest OS opinion pieces. Well, thanks for the heads up:

    Daniel Lyons is a known Microsoft shill.

    So noted.

    Just FYI, I have no vested interest in the OS wars that go on here at Slashdot. Personally, I think it's hands down the stupidest thing any person at ALL serious about technology can engage in. Seems to me, it's just a choice. I'll leave the idiocy up to the fanboys and get to better matters.

    Anyway, the idiot comment was quite lovely, even though logic dictates (in the obvious vacuum of pop opinion about Daniel Lyons I seem to be in) that maybe he's not the shill you think he is.

    Off topic here, but who's Rob Enderle? Wait, nevermind, I just don't care.

  112. analysis of data by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    The formats then become a problem. Since you are already in a posix-oriented shop, you could steer people to Gnumeric, Koffice's Kspread, or OpenOffice/StarSuite's Calc. The latest versions are quite polished and most definitely "people ready".

    Since the spread sheets are being used for analysis you get an added advantage being able to easily parse the data with other programs and scripts. OpenDocument is basically zipped XML and, unlike one high profile competitor, is fully documented and can be used without restrictions. Sorry for plugging something as esoteric as a data format, but being able to mix and match between an off the shelf spreadsheet applications and homemade scripts with the same data files has been something long overdue.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.