Slashdot Mirror


Google Pages Reviewed

Tam Hanna writes "We got access to a Google Pages review account. Get the full scoop on what Google Pages can do." The gist of it is that "Google Pages Is Not For You." It's for your mom ;)

164 comments

  1. And hear the sighs...... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of hundreds of slashdot readers as they feel betrayed by their great and perfect "Google", since this isn't for them.......

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    1. Re:And hear the sighs...... by danormsby · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. We are free to upload whatever we want using the upload function. My mum would never be able to sus out how to embed a Google Video.

      --
      Omnis amans amens
    2. Re:And hear the sighs...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
      Well, if that isn't the most dumbass thing I've ever read. And Michael Moore is telling the truth, George Bush has killed millions and Hillary Clinton will be the next President.

      If your parents paid for your education, they should demand a refund.
    3. Re:And hear the sighs...... by theStorminMormon · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I know it's OT, but

      Well, if that isn't the most dumbass thing I've ever read. And Michael Moore is telling the truth, George Bush has killed millions and Hillary Clinton will be the next President.

      If your parents paid for your education, they should demand a refund.


      Hear hear!

      -stormin
      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    4. Re:And hear the sighs...... by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      I get this page when I click the link:

      http://www.fbi.gov/?2006/03/29/google-page-creator -review/

      Is this supposed to be funny, has /. been hacked, or am I infected? I'm on a University of Idaho computer...

    5. Re:And hear the sighs...... by stm2 · · Score: 1

      Same regust for my, from Argentina. Most likely that the site did it in order to dogde the /. effect.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    6. Re:And hear the sighs...... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1
      I get this page when I click the link: http://www.fbi.gov/?2006/03/29/google-page-creator -review/ [fbi.gov] Is this supposed to be funny, has /. been hacked, or am I infected? I'm on a University of Idaho computer...
      The website just deflects the Slashdot effect. Check the coralized version : http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com.nyud.net:8090/2006/ 03/29/google-page-creator-review/
      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  2. The Review is not for you either --- /. effect by RationalRoot · · Score: 1

    Nothing nuch to see here either.

    --
    http://davesboat.blogspot.com/
  3. Duped Trash Instead of News by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I couldn't help but notice that this article is just a dupe.

    Apparently, a link to a blog with a couple paragraphs and screenshots of a service that has been covered before is newsworthy. Not in my opinion.

    Oh, and if you go to that blog that's linked in the article, there is a "Contact Us" tab which results in the same e-mail that the author of this article (Tam Hanna) linked to their name. This isn't a review, it's a "Oooh, this is neat" article which is odd considering I have a Google Pages account and it's not that neat--it's functional and simplistic but limiting. And please do notice the ads (some by Google) surrounding Tam Hanna's blog. So they'll be making some cash off the Slashdot effect. What a tool Slashdot has become.

    If you want an example of something they rejected to bring you a duped article, here's one I submitted this morning that some of you may or may not care about:

    About a week ago, Robert Jordan wrote a letter to Locus in which he stated he has amyloidosis. Amyloidosis is a rare blood disease that leaves patients with a median of one (no treatment) to four (with treatment) years left to live. He confirmed this on his publisher's website. This is devastating news for fantasy enthusiasts but on his blog he spoke about the Wheel of Time series: "Worse comes to worst, I will finish A Memory of Light, so the main story arc, at least, will be completed." Let us all wish him a permanent recovery--if he can write the epic tomes of the Wheel of Time, surely beating amyloidosis will be trivial.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Apparently, a link to a blog with a couple paragraphs and screenshots of a service that has been covered before is newsworthy. Not in my opinion.

      I share your opinion. No way is this any kind of Front Page Stuff That Matters. More like Pimp My Blog.

      Maybe the author is Taco's mom.

      If so, he should get her a Google Page, 'cause her server's choking pretty hard already...

    2. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by jettoki · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh my God, that's tragic. :(

      How could they reject a news story like that?

    3. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by period3 · · Score: 2, Funny
      So I couldn't help but notice that this article is just a dupe.


      It's not for you, it's for your mom.
    4. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Seems like you need a Google Page!

    5. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you want an example of something they rejected to bring you a duped article, here's one I submitted this morning that some of you may or may not care about:

      OK. Firstly, the article isn't a dupe. It's a link to a review of a service mentioned in a previous dupe. Note the subtle difference.

      And secondly, you have no grounds for complaint. The Slashdot Random Story Submission Selection System (SRSSSS), is completely unbiased. Not even quality submissions are granted preference!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by thebiggs · · Score: 1

      You see, I have two problems with what you wrote.

      First, as several other responders have pointed out, a review of something that has previously been posted does not constitute a dupe. Neither does the news that the public beta is expanding. These are separate news items. If you flip out everytime some new Google Beta or marginally-better iPod is announced with a [dupe] and [dupe] and [dupe] and [this too] post, you kind of miss the point: Slashdot is an ongoing conversation, so when something new happens, it's worthy of a post. Would you suggest we go back and post

      But on the other hand, you're right about Robert Jordan. I don't read him, but as a card-carrying Nerd, I know who he is, and news of his fate is of interest to me and many other Nerds. It seems you may have run afoul of an editor who didn't know who he is, or his geek-cultural importance, which is unfortunate. Since this is News for Nerds, it would be helpful if all the editors were familiar with all the varied and important flavors of Nerd interest.

    7. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi PPL,
      I am Tam Hanna from tamsPalm and felt like talking up now too.

      First of all, the author Alexander Gratz is NO ENGLISHMAN, but rather a German! His english may not be good, but so what.

      And abvout the review: we are specialized on Palm OS stuff, and not on other stuff which we only do as a "second hand".

      About the server: our web host is already working on the fix...

      Last buit not least, bvetter not talk about googlwe AdSense. The revenue made is pathetic, trust me, all it does is cover our hosting costs that flamer/lamer trolls raise up...=)

      Best regards and stop whining
      Tam Hanna

    8. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's why digg.com is so much better these days.

      Yeah, instead Digg has duped Apple ads from 1987.

    9. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by kaffiene · · Score: 1

      I agree with you - the Slashdot editors apply far too much of their own personal biases to what gets published here. Digg is much better in that regard (although their discussion lists are inferior to Slashdots)

      If the editors could piss off and let users choose stories (like Digg or Kuro5hin), then Slashdot would be a lot less sucky in my opinion.

    10. Re:Duped Trash Instead of News by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The googlites are providing us their with "do no evil" marketing goodness. Perhaps yet another story, about yet another product, that lets you create yet another web site, really is just so ho hum and no matter how many times it is repeated will remain boringly so, yes, what we need in the world is yet more tools to make boring crappy web sites.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  4. allready /.ed by broyles · · Score: 0

    looks like the page has allready been /.ed, any one got a mirror?

    1. Re:allready /.ed by tpgp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ooks like the page has allready been /.ed, any one got a mirror?

      Mirrordot

      As for the "Suitable for Mum, not slashdotters" comment, its 100MB of webspace for free

      That makes it suitable for me - even just to use to transfer large files around (when I'm behind a firewall that only lets port 80 through)

      --
      My pics.
  5. Riiiight.. by EBFoxbat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Neato... is this much different than say Geocities was? Just means myspace-like sites on google domains I think. Not my cup of tea.

    1. Re:Riiiight.. by boxxa · · Score: 1

      I have played with my Google Pages account. It is a nice little project for them and anyone intrested in basic web layouts and design but the customizeable of it is far from the needs of what a true web designer/developer needs. Anyone on the way to GooglePage hacks?

      --
      Bryan
    2. Re:Riiiight.. by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      Just upload your html and put a link on the 'home' google page, thats the best you are gonna get, because even with an index.html it still goes to your home page when you request the directory.

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
  6. Just what the world needs by Mantorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    more pages like this

    1. Re:Just what the world needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another perfectly good keyboard ruined but perfectly good cup of coffee! Thanks alot!

    2. Re:Just what the world needs by dlx0r · · Score: 1

      and this...

    3. Re:Just what the world needs by wbren · · Score: 1

      When I read your post, I thought to myself, "Come on, there's gotta be _one_ good GooglePages.com site."

      I'm sad to say, you were right all along.

      --
      -William Brendel
  7. Not for my mom by sam_paris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless it allows page creation through one huge button entitled "MAKE WEBPAGE CLICK HERE" its not going to work for my mom.

    In fact, now I come to think about it, she would have to a) Use a computer and b) Use the internet, first!

    ...not gonna happen

  8. My mom has dimentia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is for my mom, it must be really simple as my mom has dimentia :(

    1. Re:My mom has dimentia.... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny
      > If this is for my mom, it must be really simple as my mom has dimentia

      Is that the ability to travel to other dimensions?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:My mom has dimentia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds that way to me, see also the inability to spell. Is it possible that these concepts could be linked?

  9. Not for me? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Google Pages Is Not For You." It's for your mom

    But what if I am my mom?!?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:Not for me? by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what if I am my mom?!?

      In that case I would say that you have some major issues, and needn't really worry about Google...
    2. Re:Not for me? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      But what if I am my mom?!?

      Then you will be convicted for breaking the Time Travel Act, paragraph 4:

      "Time travellers who, either willfully or due to carelessness, cause a causal situation, where one or more certain events, including but not limited to the coming into existance of a certain object or life form, including but not limited to human being, including but not limited to the time traveller himself, causally follows from the event itself, either in isolation or in conjunction with other events and/or circumstances, shall be punished by being arrested on prehistoric earth for at least one year, at most his remaining life time."

      Yes, the Time Travel Act has not yet been passed, but then, the time machine has not yet been built, either. However, in your time line, of course both have already happened. All in all, it was a really bad idea to have sex with your own father!
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Not for me? by twinchang · · Score: 1
      But what if I am my mom?!?
      Hey! Your mom is reading /.? Great news for our slashdotter! Make an article here!
    4. Re:Not for me? by Christian+Henry · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. You could be your own son. 8-|

  10. Sendmail by zaguar · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know I'll get modded down for this, but if Pages is for your mom, who is sendmail for? People with PhD's in computer science and maths?

    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
    1. Re:Sendmail by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      What if my mom HAS a PhD in CS an maths ?

  11. Not my mom. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Funny

    My mom is still trying to figure out why they plugged a typewriter and a rolling soapdish into the tv.

  12. so yea, it is for your mom by escay · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTFA, this sums it up -

    What is the difference to other web hosters? Google Pages lets you create your site online, but it has neither MySQL, PHP, nor FTP support. You see its NO replacement for a common web hosting service, but it is almost PERFECT for users who want to publish their last holiday photos or theirselves. They need no knowledge about web hosting and HTML developing. Of course FTP is important for professional webmasters, but private users dont need FTP or MySQL. They need an good but easy web hosting solution.

    1. Re:so yea, it is for your mom by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course FTP is important for professional webmasters, but private users dont need FTP or MySQL. They need an good but easy web hosting solution.

      That's really an annoying stance to take though since a lot of 'private users' quickly outgrown the 'easy web hosting solution' and have to switch to full fledged hosting somewhere else. I better system would be to allow their hosting to group with their users.

    2. Re:so yea, it is for your mom by drew · · Score: 1

      Of course, he's totally wrong. Professional webmasters wouldn't use FTP or MySQL either.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    3. Re:so yea, it is for your mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course FTP is important for professional webmasters

      Um, no. FTP might be important for webmasters who get paid for it, but describing them as "professional" implies competence, and I can't call any webmaster using FTP these days competent. What next - telling people that professionals use telnet to log into their shell accounts?

  13. Oh my, yes. by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The gist of it is that "Google Pages Is Not For You." It's for your mom ;)

    So you not only have summarized TFA FOR me - so I don't have to RTFA - AND you're saying it's nothing for anyone but a sporadic user... Why are you wasting space on slasdot?

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Oh my, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it answered the major question I had from the previous story, no FTP support, so useless for me. And the screenshots are nice for those of us who can't get the service yet.

    2. Re:Oh my, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found it to be the most interesting post today. Now I won't have to help my mom or sisters upload pics and create links.

      I can spend my time on more interesting stuff.

    3. Re:Oh my, yes. by Korben+Dallas · · Score: 1

      So they can waste space on it again in a few hours.

    4. Re:Oh my, yes. by mblase · · Score: 1

      So you not only have summarized TFA FOR me - so I don't have to RTFA - AND you're saying it's nothing for anyone but a sporadic user... Why are you wasting space on slasdot?

      So that you know it, now. The real question is, why are you wasting space commenting on a posting you just said is worthless?

    5. Re:Oh my, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Geeks, who Worship Everything by Google, are just dying to know what the thing is actually like, perhaps?

    6. Re:Oh my, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasting space on slashdot? What are you, a newspaper editor? The whole idea about slashdot is wasting time, the /. servers have plenty of space.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Well... by O'Laochdha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did anyone really expect anything else? These kinds of webpages have a long history of being geared towards the mass-market, and the mass-market is semi-luddites. The primary market couldn't use HTML if their lives depended on it, let alone script anything. And one has to recognize that a site that does the things the average geek would want it to do would get too much traffic to give out for free. They can't really afford to have interesting websites on a service like this, or they'd go bankrupt.

  16. I'm so glad... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... that I have slashdot to remind me several times about every little thing that Google does.

    Gadzooks.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:I'm so glad... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 0

      googledot.org has expired... They should swipe it up.....

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    2. Re:I'm so glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kill yourself.

    3. Re:I'm so glad... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      Sarcasm is when I thank slashdot for doing something that's getting annoying.

      Irony is an anonymous coward telling me to kill myself for publically stating an opinion.

      The mixture of these mechanisms by amateurs is not recommended.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  17. Re:But What About.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    If his mom is a milf, she can probably use those looks to get some neighborhood boy to make a page for her, so she has much better ways at going about getting a website...

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  18. Re:The Review is not for you either --- /. effect by remembertomorrow · · Score: 1

    Correct heading:

    The Slashdot Effect: REVIEWE@$@#%@%*NO CARRIER*

    --
    Registered Linux user #421033
  19. Re: Transferring large files around by ricepudd · · Score: 1

    Since I've spent the last couple of weeks failing to upload a 1.5mb pdf to my GooglePages account (despite the faq saying I should be able to upload anything up to 10mb, and having managed to upload 200k pictures without problems) I wouldn't consider it useful for personal file transfer.
    I'd stick to your gmail account for that.

  20. Internet landfill by gcw1 · · Score: 1

    Page editors like this although great for people who don't understand page design and hosting, will inevitably just make it easier for everyone to dump more crap then there already is on the internet...

  21. For your mom... by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

    The gist of it is that "Google Pages Is Not For You." It's for your mom.

    Hey - that's my motto too.

  22. 'How do I turn my Google page on?' - Mom by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    The gist of it is that "Google Pages Is Not For You." It's for your mom ;)

    So it has a personal tech support agent and hand to hold built right into it?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:'How do I turn my Google page on?' - Mom by twinchang · · Score: 1
      So it has a personal tech support agent and hand to hold built right into it?
      Yes. Shouldn't mom's son and daughter fit this tech support prefectly? er, wait...
  23. less than yahoo by whitestone · · Score: 1

    At yahoo, I have no problem to enter html statements, while at gpc i have to compose the html off line and upload the page. Of course 100Mb is far more than geocities 15Mb, but frankly, I had hoped for a webspace of 2Gb and counting.....

    1. Re:less than yahoo by op12 · · Score: 1

      There's an option on GPC (I believe in the bottom left) to edit the HTML directly. You can edit it online.

  24. In Bed by smoor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google Pages isn't for your, its for your Mom.... IN BED

    Seriously though, did anyone thing that Google Pages would be met by anything but annoyance and derision by the uber-geeks of the slashdot crowd?

    Its like discussing Garanimals (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=garanimals) in a fashion forum. I wish they had those for adults... sigh...

  25. Use it as an image store by LoKi128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Upload all your images and other binary files, and use this as the bulk storage server for your website. Keep the PHP somewhere else, and use the free bandwidth offered by Google. Wonder what the cap on transfer/month is, or if there is a restriction on outside referals...

    1. Re:Use it as an image store by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      They only give you 100MB of storage space. If you've alrady got hosting that provides PHP, there's little point going to all that trouble just to save 100MB of space, space your current host can provide cheaply anyway.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Use it as an image store by LoKi128 · · Score: 1

      Not really talking about space... most providers limit how many GB you can transfer per month, haven't seen if Google does or not.

  26. Not true by ultrabot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google pages is alright for me. I'm not a web designer, nor do I care about all the gizmos you can do. I just want to push pics and text to the web, and even a basic Wiki would be fine for me.

    What I need, and Geocities doesn't provide, is a fast ad-free ajaxy interface and "one login", i.e. gmail/gtalk/whatever login.

    "One login to rule them all..."

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  27. If you've got it use it by tecker · · Score: 1

    Hmm well obviouly the page isnt being hosted by Google Pages if the site had been slashdoted. Hmm. If you got a page and played with it why not show it off. Obviously Slashdot it not for you (or your server).

    --
    Procrastinating life a way at a rapid rate of speed.
  28. Good for Web Designers too! by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've actually found this tool very usefull for starting out when designing webpages too.

    It produces perfect cross-browser compatible seperation of CSS/HTML; no tables for one thing, and there's a whole bunch of template layouts to get started with (2 column. The rest just involves saving the source, tweaking the CSS to your own look & feel and adding content! Granted, the layouts are never exactly what you're looking for, but still, it's a good starting point.

    Well done Google!

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Good for Web Designers too! by ejd3 · · Score: 1

      I've used it in this way too just as a starting point and have to say it produces a good looking template that you can work with, albiet with confusing and extremely long source, because of many IE hacks of course. The site designer is slick and easy to use. I guess that this is just another free website page creator and hoster among many similar services. The only problems I've had are connecting to page creator. Too many "Oops! Google Page Creator is not currently available" or whatever rubish.

    2. Re:Good for Web Designers too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, I tried to find a way of saying this without sounding like a complete asshole, honestly, but there's just no way. So deal with it.

      What the hell are you talking about? Google have always been terrible with client-side code. Always. Google Pages is no exception. If you think that this is "good for web designers", then you really - really - have no business calling yourself a web designer. It might be good for complete amateurs who have trouble remembering what a tag is, but any competent web designer could code something better than this in no time at all.

  29. Is anyone reminded of this? by 3dWarlord · · Score: 1
  30. Article summary missing last line by brouski · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that summary end with "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh!"?

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  31. For someone with a Wife and Child by hcob$ · · Score: 1

    The Google Pages is a great way to make a website in the time that you have. It's easy and clean. Most of the annoying part of a page (the spacing and layout) is done for you and you just add your content.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  32. "Google Pages Is Not For You."??? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0

    "Google Pages Is Not For You."??? Well, neither is tamspalm.tamoggemon.com.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  33. Is it just me? by GigG · · Score: 1

    I've been trying for over 2 weeks now to access pages.google.com and all I ever see is..
    500 - Google Page Creator Oops! Google Page Creator is having a little trouble right now.
    This is not because of anything you did; it's just a little hiccup in our system that will hopefully go away soon. We apologize for the inconvenience, and recommend you try reloading this page. error.metadata.read

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    1. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beta.

      --- Original Message ---

      Is it just me?
      (Score:1)
      by GigG (887839) Alter Relationship on 10:11 AM March 29th, 2006 (#15017720)
      I've been trying for over 2 weeks now to access pages.google.com and all I ever see is..
      500 - Google Page Creator Oops! Google Page Creator is having a little trouble right now.
      This is not because of anything you did; it's just a little hiccup in our system that will hopefully go away soon. We apologize for the inconvenience, and recommend you try reloading this page.
      error.metadata.read

  34. Just the beginning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The haven't really bothered to look that deeply into Google Pages, but from what I see, it's a WYSIWYG web design client.

    Anyone else see this as just a stepping stone to building a full featured word processor/desktop publishing client? Complete with built-in file manager.

  35. Why is Google doing this redundant service?! For $ by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    Just another means of ad revenue. They'll figure out some way to get ad revenue out of this--why else would they do it?

  36. For my mom? For me too then by devilsbrigade · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not really, my mom uses Front page to do her website for school. To be honest, this IS more for me. I don't classify myself as one of the elite uber geeks, who can code a webpage in perl while debuggin a SQL server and have time to post snarky remarks on /. at the same time. I HATE coding webpages. I can't think of a more boring exercise in the world. Why do you think there are so many poorly designed ones? People stop learing how to do. Its just a whole lot easier for me to post my 100 MB of internet trash to web when all the hard design work is done for me. I can post some pics, make some jokes that are funny to me and my friends, and still have time to go out and have a life that doesn't revolve around the glow of my laptop monitor. Elitist ruin every application regardless of what its for. When did the web bcome a place where on the instructed and capable can play. Why shouldn't anyone with a computer and internet connect be allowed to have thier own special little place to play, celebrate their own life and enjoy making webpage? Do you truly think that thier 100 MBs of usage and 1 - 2 view per month is really going to affect the upload bandwidth of your cable modem causing that critical sword strike you launched at lord Razak to fall wrong ruining the last 6 months of your life? Get off your internet high horse and let people enjoy it.

  37. Google pages *is* for me! by nicestepauthor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been maintaining a website on sourceforge for years now. I had to create the pages, then tar them up and use scp to transfer the tarball to SF's server, then log in and untar it, change authorites on the files so they could be served, do minor corrections with vi, etc. Nothing challenging but tedious as hell. I would have probably released more files if I didn't have to update the website each time.

    I decided that I wanted to simplify the website, put everything on one page, pretty it up with a stylesheet, etc. I had no time to do this. Then Google Pages came along and I was able to create my new website by doing copy and paste from the old website. I was able to try many different stylesheets before deciding on the one I wanted, and I published the website by pressing one button. This combined with what sourceforge gives me is exactly what I wanted.

    You can check out the website at http://nicestep.sourceforge.net/ . (You'll be redirected to the google pages version from my original site.)

    1. Re:Google pages *is* for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to create Java applications with the look and feel of N*XTSTEP?

      Wow, you found the worst of both worlds...

  38. Secret Strategy by XMilkProject · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Google has a secret strategy to easily increase the quality of their search results.

    1) Make it easy to create a useless crap webpage.
    2) All crap webpage designers flock to Google Pages.
    3) Google just blocks Google Pages domain from search results.
    4) ??????????
    5) Profit!

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  39. you guys are missing the point by theStorminMormon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As someone who's relatively web-savy (I've used Dreamweaver and Flash extensively in the past and I've grown to loathe Frontpage) I've got to say that I think GooglePages is a truly awesome innovation. Sure - there's no one thing about it that's really that great. But think about the fact that they've bundled the web-hosting, domain-name, and web-creation all into 1 package, made it simple, and made it free.

    This isn't just for people who don't can't learn HTML. This is for anyone who wants to get a decent site on the itnernet but simply has better thaings to do than to learn to make attractive web pages from scratch. Face it - the GooglePages look pretty sweet (especially compared to Geocities, etc.)

    There are a lot of people out there who would benefit from being able to create and maintain their own webpages who simply don't have the time to learn more tech stuff. I tried it out and was immediately convinced it would work perfectly for my dad (an English professor - http://terryl.givens.googlepages.com/ ). He doesn't need SQL, PHP, etc. No messageboards, no forums, no online-shopping, no registering. Just text, images, and some pdf/doc docs.

    My dad's a smart man. He could learn all about web hosting, html, etc. if he wanted to. But he's got a PhD in Comparative Literature and he's a litle busy with doing his actual job to start learning how to do tech stuff. There are lot of professionals and other busy people out there like him. They would benefit from a very simple web site. Not just simple to design, but simple to order (try explaining domain names vs. web hosting to most non-techies) and maintain. Not to mention free.

    GooglePages is not rocket science - but in my opinion it goes a long way towards hitting the sweet spot where convenience and function are optimized for people who want to be able to make web pages with no serious training.

    I also think it's not a bad idea for techies either, if you're too busy with other stuff. I'm working full time, I do consulting part time, I have my own small company on top of that, and I'm about to start a masters program. I don't have time to mess with a web site, but it's important to keep a presence on the web (resume stuff). GooglePages is perfect for that.

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    1. Re:you guys are missing the point by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      It kinda looks empty without the Google Ads. I often find the Google Ads informative at the least.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  40. My Mom porgrams in Assembly... by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

    me: and she benches 250.
    guy: peices?
    me: peices?! No, pounds baby! POUNDS!
    mom: I'll bring my tools. I start tomorrow.

  41. Much nicer than most others' offerings by jbarr · · Score: 1

    The article is a bit sparse for a "review", but it does bring up some good points.

    In other places, I have seen arguments that GooglePages is nothing more than a "Googlefied" version of GeoCities or AngelFire. While there is some truth to this, let's not forget two things:

    1. GooglePages (currently) doesn't have any ads. Unlike GC or AF, there are no annoying "ad gadgets" that can really detract from the site content. GC and AF convey the notion of "Hi, you've reached my uber-free site that sports lots of ads because I'm too cheap to pay for a Web host." GooglePages simply conveys simple, clean content. Eventually, Google may include ads, but like all of their other products that include ads, they'll likely be very unobtrusive.

    2. GooglePages doean't require any offline applications to maintain content. I believe either GC or AF required a download/install of an app to manage the pages. GooglePages is slick and quick, right from most browsers.

    FInally, let's also not forget that GooglePages is not meant to replace full-blown hosting services. It's not a CMS, and it's not a Blog site. What it is, is a clean, simple, and fast way of posting simple Web pages. I really like the fact that I can create simple, ad-hoc pages. Yes, they are "canned" but they are also flexible. And if you want to upload your own HTML content, you are free to do so.

    -Jim
    http://googlepagestips.com/

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  42. SCOOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's really happened is that thousands of Slashdot fan boys where in their bedrooms furiously masturbating, and just about when they where about to climax, they read this and went all soft. Just like when mom walks in on them.

  43. My Mom is Mrs Steve Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you insensitive clod!

  44. My timing sucks... by cniemira · · Score: 1

    Just a couple days before I planned to release the first alpha of my new toy (shameless plug), I get an invite from Google to join their Pages beta test. So I checked it out and immediately thought little of it.

    Sure, it's a nice system, but I was actually hoping they'd have done something more along the lines of what psychograph does (or, will do when it's past alpha release). Pages seems rather limited when it comes to design elements, taking a rather cookie cutter approach to layout and templates. The only real advantage I see is, aside from the Google name, the storage volume they're giving away for free.

  45. Woot by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it give me yet another chance to shamelessly pimp my Google Pages resume! And it's even slightly on-topic, if you squint.

    |
    V

  46. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am your Mom, you insensitive clod!

  47. this article by HolyMoto · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find that this link takes them to the FBI homepage?

    1. Re:this article by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

      yes! me!

      --
      You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    2. Re:this article by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I end up there too. Same with http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/ - wonder what the [censored] is up with that.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    3. Re:this article by boxturtleme · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's kinda weird.

    4. Re:this article by N3Z · · Score: 1

      yes. Something happened in the last 10 minutes or so. Hacked? Overloaded and intentionally redirected? Are they trying to irritate the FBI?

      --
      .signature not found
    5. Re:this article by natedubbya · · Score: 1
      Yes I saw that too. The webhost might forward large amounts of traffic to the FBI site, thinking they are under a DOS attack....or in this case, slashdot attack.

    6. Re:this article by zenwarrior · · Score: 1

      Yes, within that storyline is indeed a link to the FBI's web site. Good to know it's not just me. I thought Bush's administration had gone so far as to start hijacking browsers of its critics! That would be one helluva way to send a "We're watching you." message.

      --
      /.'s Psychic-in-Residence: Psychic to the Geeks
    7. Re:this article by Sharth · · Score: 1

      That's what happens for me too. Weird.

    8. Re:this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I get a page at the FBI site... hmmmm

    9. Re:this article by zenwarrior · · Score: 1

      Let's go for it. A /. attack on the FBI. All at once, everybody click...NOW!

      --
      /.'s Psychic-in-Residence: Psychic to the Geeks
    10. Re:this article by robgue · · Score: 1

      yup

    11. Re:this article by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they couldn't take the bandwidth strain of being slashdotted, so set up a redirect. Odd, given that they submitted the story to Slashdot themselves, and you'd think if they couldn't stand the heat they'd stay out of the kitchen.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    12. Re:this article by conglacio · · Score: 1

      So the FBI will get the slashdot effect? Clever terrorist weapon.

    13. Re:this article by ben+there... · · Score: 0

      lol, same here. I thought the FBI had made a mistake with their proxy that screwed up the base URL or something. Had me a little worried for a second or 2. Nothing to worry about. Their proxy is still working fine.

    14. Re:this article by jorday23 · · Score: 1

      That could make sense, perhaps the fbi have some deal, so when a server assumes its being dos, its redirected to the fbi page so they can see where the dos attacks are coming from? I dono... they prob just offloading the page loads onto a server they think can handle it.

  48. Link broken at host? by mblase · · Score: 1

    My browser reads the link correctly, but every time I click on it I get redirected to http://www.fbi.gov/

    1. Re:Link broken at host? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the same thing happens here too.

  49. FBI page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I follow the link I end up at the FBI website. The url in my browser gets rewritten to
    http://www.fbi.gov/?2006/03/29/google-page-creator -review/
    WTF?
    Anyone else get this? I'm in the UK btw.

    1. Re:FBI page? by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      Yeah I also just got this - very weird!

  50. WARNING - Link Redirect by rGauntlet · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks like they didn't appreciate the extra traffic to their site, and now it redirects to the FBI website.

    --
    http://www.yeraze.com http://www.vizworld.com
    1. Re:WARNING - Link Redirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where is the city manager of Tuttle when we need him?

    2. Re:WARNING - Link Redirect by mporcheron · · Score: 2, Informative

      maybe he's contacted the FBI to start shutting the net down after Reg didn't do much

    3. Re:WARNING - Link Redirect by xtaski · · Score: 1

      It was Tuttled!

  51. Re:Use it as an image store (Podcast Store) by SmokeTheHun · · Score: 1

    I agree with LOKI If there are no bandwidth constraints, it WOULD be a good place to serve up a popular podcast...not that I have one but someone COULD...

  52. The editor wasn't kidding by underpope · · Score: 1

    The review REALLY isn't for us! Apparently the FBI feels very strongly about that.

    --
    "A statesman is a dead politician. Lord knows we need more statesmen." Opus
  53. Not only that... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Either the FBI site was designed by an evil goldfish, or it doesn't support Firefox at all. I suspect both.

    Black text on dark, dark blue that's probably supposed to look white, plus a pile of links all stuffed into what appears to be a "Best viewed by Internet Explorer [insert version] at [insert resolution]" page. In case it's not obvious, I detest pages that don't scale properly to the 1600x1200 I run my browser at, especially if they are unreadable on my browser.

    I expect this crap on a 13-year-old's FrontPage site, but a government homepage?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Not only that... by Grant+Root · · Score: 1

      The FBI page looks perfectly fine to me in Firefox 1.5.0.1 on Windows XP. The top right navigation links are broken on a couple of pages, but the appearance is OK.

    2. Re:Not only that... by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't knock them, they're trying. Why, one day they may even provide email access to their agents!

    3. Re:Not only that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops! You're a moron!

      The FBI website is perfectly readable and looks fine in Opera, Konqueror, Firefox and Links. And I'm using an even higher resolution than you. If there's a problem, it's on your end...

  54. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George W Bush has declared victory in Iraq.

  55. New ideas? by aoporto · · Score: 1

    Seems to me like Google is starting to run out of fresh ideas. If you'd like to see something really new, check out http://listring.com/

  56. It's a known fact that Google is....... by Arkham79 · · Score: 1

    .......Ruining Everything and making geeks look bad. You can even buy the t-shirt - rumour has it that Mapquest just took a bulk delivery.......

    --
    https://comerford.net
  57. Re:Why is Google doing this redundant service?! Fo by entrylevel · · Score: 1

    *sigh*

    Maybe there will be ads at some point, and maybe I'm just feeding a troll, but currently there are no Google ads on any *.googlepages.com web sites that I have seen so far.

    --
    Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
  58. fbi.gov? by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    At first I thought I was missing the joke, then I went back and checked the URL's. Either they've been hacked, or they thought they'd be funny and redirect to http://www.fbi.gov/?2006/03/29/google-page-creator -review/. Either that or I've been hacked.

    1. Re:fbi.gov? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, wtf?

  59. We have server problems by Alexander+Gratz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi,

    i am editor at TamsPalm.

    We currently have server problems. Probably someone hacked into our server and linked to the FBI site.

    We'll try to fix this as soon as possible.

    Alexander Gratz

  60. When will Google start putting ADS on GPages? by aggietech · · Score: 1

    .... someday .... Google Ads will make it onto Google Pages -- like AdSense for BLogger ...

  61. er.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else getting linked to the FBI.gov website.. or is it just me =/

  62. What did I do wrong? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Informative

    I clicked on the link and ended up here:

    http://www.fbi.gov/?2006/03/29/google-page-creator -review/

    BTW, there's no review there.

    1. Re:What did I do wrong? by scdeimos · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're not the only one. Putting on my conspiracy hat, FBI must be taking over blogs mentioning Google until Google's given over the search data the government asked for. ;)

    2. Re:What did I do wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just do a little whois action. The feds took the domain, but the site is in germany:

      http://80.237.216.86/tamspalm/

    3. Re:What did I do wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hi,
      Tam Hanna once again. We were DOSSed, and my web host decided to forward the a$$face to FBI...
      Best regards
      Tam Hanna

    4. Re:What did I do wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you do wrong?? Not much other than slashdotting FBI...

    5. Re:What did I do wrong? by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

      s/DDOSed/slashdoted

      http://mirrordot.com/stories/0b8da8db7dc8e63ecdb84 47298417176/index.html

      **ducks from the incomming rate down**

      --
      Scott Swezey
  63. Now I am on their list - Not enough FOIL!!! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I have managed to fly under their radar until now. I check my lines.. oh so careful not to go to fbi.gov

    Don't make waves... just an average peon citizen who votes Republican.

    Oh my... where is my FOIL!!! Never enough FOIL!!!

    *charlton heston like* Damn slashdot... DAMN THEM! *end charlton heston like*

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  64. Definitely not for me, huh? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Looks like it's actually for the Albanian Crime Syndicate.

    (Since when to slashdotted pages start pointing to the FBI??)

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  65. FBI looks to have taken over the domain by Shacky · · Score: 1

    Greetings all, In the past, when a group (say, warez, etc..) has their website taken
    down by the FBI, it's replaced by a redirect to the FBI's homepage. This
    appears to have happened to this site also. When you look at the original link, without clicking it, it's correct.
    When you click it, it's redirected with the same directory content as the
    original site, but goes to the FBI site. Simply a case of a website that was /.'d at almost the
    same time it was taken down by the G-men.

  66. How does it compare to MS Office Live? by melted · · Score: 1

    Could anyone give a rundown on how it compares to Microsoft Office Live? Their beta came out earlier than Google's. :0)

    1. Re:How does it compare to MS Office Live? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Office-Live only give select people an account. You have to fill out the registration, and wait 2 - 4 weeks to find out if you have been chosen.

  67. Figures. by gQuigs · · Score: 0

    Neither of em are done, but I'm making two websites in Googlepages.
    http://taadinc.googlepages.com/
    http://gquigs.googlepages.com/
    Blah. Maybe I don't belong on slashdot.
    I'm not a web developer so why should I focus on site design?

  68. FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like Google had the FBI have the ISP shut down the site. It seems there is a rewrite of the entire Domain if you try to connect to it.

  69. It's quite obvious by BruceCage · · Score: 1

    Knowing Google's relationship with the FBI, this smells like a cover up!

    --
    Perfect is the enemy of done.
  70. googlepages==freebandwidth (can they handle /. ?) by steve426f · · Score: 1

    Despite the fact that the sites are limited as far as scripting, I've found Google Pages useful for throwing up a few files when you need friends to access them, or if you need remote access to a few files because my modem upstream is too slow for the local server. Also, I agree with the others that the templates force people to make a clean site with descent layout unlike other sites (myspace comes to mind). Any idea if a Google Pages site can be affected by /.? As far as I know, the bandwidth is unlimited.

  71. not for my Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom doesn't have electricity, you insensitive clod! No, really. The electricity part, not the clod part. Well, you might be a clod, but my mom definately doens't have electricity.

  72. stop bashing "Mom" by nicoh · · Score: 1

    I understand that /. is latently misogynistic, having read it for the past n years, but can we keep the mom-bashing to a minimum? Why is the word "Mom" used when "luser" is meant? It implies that moms are lusers, and that helps to perpetuate negative stereotyping about women in the computer industry. Also, it's a played out cliche which is no longer amusing. As a mom (and sysadmin), it's highly irritating/offensive to be continually confronted with this crap. Yes, most moms couldn't tell PHP from PCP, but neither can the average person. We have already have a word for the average person: luser. Let's not drag "Mom" into this. Imagine if we put other groups into this construction: "Package X is not for you, it's for [black|elderly|lesbian|midwestern] people". There is absolutely nothing in giving birth to a child which removes permanently one's ability to understand technology.

    1. Re:stop bashing "Mom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The implication is not that this is especially suited for mothers. The implication is that, as all people have mothers, and geeks are (hopefully) people, all geeks have mothers, and those mothers will ask for a recommendation of a program or service to serve a purpose, creating web pages in this case. It could have just as easily said "for your Dad" instead, excepting that, in older generations, women learned to type in order to work in secretarial or clerical roles, while men did not, and therefore it is more expected for one's mother to have technical skills neccessary to be asking such a question than one's father. Also, men are more likely to try to find their own solution to a problem, rather than asking someone's opinion of the best way to go about it. Finally, it could have been generalized to "your elders," which was what was intended, but one would not really be recommending software to many other elders than one's parents.

    2. Re:stop bashing "Mom" by chawly · · Score: 1

      Just showed this to an elderly South Korean mother. She stopped chatting with her elderly black robot companion for just long enough to say "Jolly Good Show - keep it up !". Her elderly black robot companion - who had a distinctly Hispanic accent - added "Yeah Moma ! Go Moma ! You hot Moma !" And this seemed vaguely supportive to me, even though the robot then suffered an attack of hiccups. They then returned to their interrupted discussion which concerned alcoholism in elderly South Korean mothers and their elderly robot companions, the main point being a disagreement concerning whether the robot in question should "share the bottle".

      The lesson I took away from this encounter was the following:

      Moms (at least elderly alcoholic South Korean Moms) don't want to want to be "left out of this" and neither do their elderly black Hispanic robot companions
      As a father (and sysadmin) I say that they have every right - be they drunk or sober.
      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  73. Theory:Slashdot's never been better thanks to Digg by ThurlMakes7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Slashdot has always had some great contributors, and some ornery old timers. A few years ago, when people said "I can't read Slashdot anymore," they were mostly referring to very young, or very extreme (or both) idealogues and zealots.

    Today it's Digg which attracts these people, and Slashdot has improved immensely as a result. While it ain't perfect - too many dupes, and too many funny contributions get marked "-1 Troll" - I can't ever remember Slashdot being as good as it is now.

    The default mode of discourse on Slashdot looks like this:

    • User A: I think X
      • User B: I disagree, because of Y
      • User A: But what about Z?
    While Digg's default discourse looks like this:

    • User A: I love X!
      • User B: Me too. I love X!
    • User C: I love X even more. Digg!
    • User D: X is the greatest. Double Digg Plus!
    Digg's a game and a social club, which is cool if you just want to meet people who think exactly like you. It doesn't have great discussions though, because it's designed to encourage groupthink.

    Enough of the four-digit old-timers still contribute to Slashdot, too. Digg's never had wise tribal elders - and with the group reinforcement now so strong, it's not going to start attracting them now.

    So we owe Digg a big Thank-You. ;-)

  74. Embedded CSS? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    I hope this is only a Beta thing. It's kinda funny that they'd even consider embedding CSS considering how lean they make all their sites. I guess each page will have a different style and probably won't have many repeat visitors. But if many people visit more than one or two pages of a site, it would still probably save quite a bit of bandwidth.

  75. GPC Vs. Geocities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geocities is blocked in China. Google pages will rule the world--mark my words!