Slashdot Mirror


Korea Unveils World's Second Android

Chosun Ilbo is reporting that Korea has unveiled the worlds second android. From the article: "Korea has developed its own android capable of facial expressions on its humanoid face, the second such machine to be developed after one from Japan. The Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy invited some 60 children to the Kyoyuk Munhwa Hoekwan in Seoul to introduce Ever-1 to the public. The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot."

232 comments

  1. Cue the sexbot jokes by afaik_ianal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  2. Nameing issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being the Worlds Second Android, would the name Radam-1 be more fitting? Just a suggestion.

    1. Re:Nameing issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      being the Worlds Second Android, would the name Radam-1 be more fitting? Just a suggestion.

      That's a silly suggestion. If it's an android and not a robot then what's with the R? So drop that.
      Now denote that it's the second by putting an S in front. Presto! Sadam.

  3. Yeah by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first andriod being Abraham Lincoln at Knott's Berry Farm. "Four Score and seven years ago..." *random flash photographer* "DESTROY! DESTROY!" But seriously, its kinda sad that Asia's mass media usually puts robots in such a good light (as oppossed to our western "there taking over!" luddite outlook) that we won't be producing anything like this for a while. I for one welcome our new robot masters, with their 6 facial expressions and 400 phrases.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "there taking over!"

      If these robots know the difference between "they're" and "there" (or "you're" and "your"), we are truly fucked.

      -Luddite Westerner

    2. Re:Yeah by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      Well damn, that means they've already beat Gore..better start convincing them as I can assist in rounding up others to toil in their underground tungsten mines.

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    3. Re:Yeah by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln was at Disneyland, not Knott's.

      Still, I'm rather looking forward to Mr. Jobs' Wild Ride.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Yeah by cyberwiz01 · · Score: 1

      IIRC the Abraham Lincoln android was from Disneyland.

    5. Re:Yeah by operagost · · Score: 1
      But seriously, its kinda sad that Asia's mass media usually puts robots in such a good light (as oppossed to our western "there taking over!" luddite outlook) that we won't be producing anything like this for a while.
      Other than the labor-unit driven hysteria against automation since the 1960s (robots, NOT androids), most Americans have no problem with them. I'm not sure where you're getting your information. It seems to be in vogue to impose every knuckle-dragging attribute on Americans lately.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  4. terrible name by MS_Word · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's almost as bad as B-4

    1. Re:terrible name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think hollywood film FX creators have made better humanoid faces and robots.

    2. Re:terrible name by foundme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So it's better to name it 34B?

      --
      Please stop entering code 2,2,7,6,6,4
    3. Re:terrible name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the second android. The first android is named after 'Adam', the first man in the Bible, and ends with an 'a' for 'android'.

      Adama

      (told you he's a cylon)

    4. Re:terrible name by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better than "Wii".

    5. Re:terrible name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sunk my battleship. :(

    6. Re:terrible name by Murgalon · · Score: 1

      What about making a teenager version? They can call it Whatever.

    7. Re:terrible name by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      ...Ever-1 to the public. The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot.

      At least it isn't an advanced A.I. platform as well. They could have combined Eve, the first human name found in the bible, with 'L' for Learning.

  5. Gynoid by MITDude · · Score: 1, Informative

    Isn't that a gynoid, not an android?

  6. Second? by heatdeath · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh...there's only been one before that? What do they define as an android? Because there's obviously a very low bar of quality if they consider that to be an android. Pretty sure all of the tin cans with legs from the 1950's should also qualify as androids if this does.

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    1. Re:Second? by KrayzieKyd · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wiki states that

      An android is a robot made to resemble a human, usually both in appearance and behaviour. The word derives from the Greek andr-, " meaning "man, male", and the suffix -eides, used to mean "of the species; alike" (from eidos "species"). The word droid, a robot in the Star Wars universe, is derived from this meaning.

      Your "tin cans" didn't resemble humans, therefore they are not androids. There is a MAJOR difference between Robot, Android, and Cyborg.

    2. Re:Second? by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

      so I guess by your definition its a robot if we put her in a wheelchair and say she's on prozac?

      --
      --
    3. Re:Second? by KrayzieKyd · · Score: 1

      You're very odd.

    4. Re:Second? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      What do they define as an android?

      Apparently they're using the term to refer to a gynoid.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:Second? by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Your "tin cans" didn't resemble humans, therefore they are not androids.

      They do if you look from a distance and squint a bit.

      "Ever" isn't an androïd either since it isn't mobile beyond it's face and marginal movement of the upper limbs (it isn't clear wether it can do anything beyond wave about). IMO it doesn't qualify. It's good research in human/machine interaction but it's certainly not an androïd.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  7. Intresting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make robot
    2. Invite 60 children for the robot to eat
    3. Post on slashdot to get audience
    4. ??????
    5. Profit

  8. Dupe? by brouski · · Score: 1

    Is this a dupe, or did it just take a while to make /.? I know I've seen this already, pics and all.

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    1. Re:Dupe? by datafr0g · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EveR-1 it made it's first public appearance on the 4th of May.

      Scary shit if you ask me... but pretty amazing what they did with a budget of $300K USD.
      If this had been built in the US they probably would had to have poured millions into development for the same result.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Dupe? by afaik_ianal · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know I've seen this already, pics and all.

      No, not a dupe. You're thinking of Real Doll.

    3. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, probably an upgrade of one of those. it's not like it's dancing and helping you carring things like the japanese one.

    4. Re:Dupe? by N.+P.+Coward · · Score: 1

      At least this one is lady-like. "Knees together, girls, knees together."

    5. Re:Dupe? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      "Make your knees neighbors," as the director of my cotillion used to say to the young girls in attendance.

    6. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If this had been built in the US they probably would had to have poured millions into development for the same result.
      Rich people are lazy.
    7. Re:Dupe? by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      Yup, saw this on Spanish television last weekend at my old folks' home. I was amazed... Amazed and shocked that I had to learn of this from some backward country's international broadcast station rather than slashdot. Since when do we lag on conventional media pickup for tech news?

      *reads telegram sent by the /. board of directors*

      Oh, I see...

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    8. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, saw this on Spanish television last weekend at my old folks' home.

      Taco is that you? I know you've turned thirty today, but that's no reason to go and live in an old folks home.

  9. And like Buzz Aldrin on the simpsons... by OzRoy · · Score: 1

    Second comes right after first [long pause]

  10. Woah! by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    The Uncanny Valley attacks again! This one gives me the creeps!
    At least this one looks slightly less creepy than that SimPal thing from 6th Day.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  11. Now that we have two androids by koweja · · Score: 3, Funny

    the only possible solution is to have them fight to the death Rock 'em Sock 'em Robot Style

  12. Do not believe these claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are actually claiming the second android is a clone of the first korean android. I have my doubts.

  13. "Uncanny Valley" by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dunno, judging by the pictures it looks like we haven't quite reached the other side of the Uncanny Valley yet.

    1. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing most people don't realize is that people can be in the uncanny valley with respect to other people. This is one of the why wars are (must be?) fought. This is also why "but a gecko, he can be trusted".

    2. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by cgenman · · Score: 2, Funny

      judging by the pictures it looks like we haven't quite reached the other side of the Uncanny Valley yet.

      No, but I'm sure we're going to find the Creepy Valley Dwellers soon.

    3. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Can you rephrase that?

    4. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      I think he meant that sometimes other people may seem so strange to us that we feel threatened, thus provoking that fight reflex that keeps provoking wars.

      Of course, there are other, much better, reasons, like greed and insanity. Sometimes simple fear can cause, or deter, a conflict.

      Of course, with an android, it has to look so real that it couldn't be human, like American models.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    5. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      I realize your post is not an example of what I am about to complain about ;) But the phrase/notion "uncanny valley" gets tossed around way too much... Roger Ebert cited it as something that affected him while watching one of those stupid animated movies with talking animals. The wiki page cites the "uncanny valley" as a possible reason for the failure of The Spirits Within at the box office. Wow... those are some stupid conclusions.

      Truth be told, most people could handle seeing something that is not alive, and yet looks extremely life-like. Yes, it might make some uncomfortable for a short time... but that is common during many "first time" experiences. Once these lifelike robots are being sold half-off at Walmart -- poof! -- there goes the vaunted "uncanny valley"...

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    6. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I don't wanna know...

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      While I do agree that the Uncanny Valley is often invoked inappropriately (particularly the FF movie, which suffered from ill-conceived plot more than it did creepy animation), I have trouble with your premise that the Uncanny Valley would disappear with increased familiarity.

      Just because we have learned to overcome, through repetitive conditioning, a particular instinct, it does not follow that the instinct just disappears or does not have an impact. Rather, it gets buried into the subconscious. And Freud only knows what it does when it gets stuck there! ;)

      But seriously, other things aside, who knows, if the uncanny valley turns out to be a real effect, what effect it would have if we were constantly exposed to uncanny stimuli. After all, we train soldiers to block out the horrors of war, and yet a solid percentage of those who actually see combat develop nervous conditions as a result of facing stimuli that the human mind is ill-equipped to handle. I shudder to think what an entire populace with low-grade PTSD would be like.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    8. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      I think the term can apply to things other than robots. Japanese-style animation, I don't have a problem with, but I can kinda see how someone could. For me, a prime example of something that's smack dab in the middle of the valley is CG along the lines of Baby Geniuses. I never saw the movie, but the trailers were bad enough. Who the hell finds that the least bit cute? It's disturbing as hell. Now Look Who's Talking was another matter entirely. That was alright, even cute at times. It would also be OK if they went to the other side of the valley--if they could do the CG in a toned-down, mostly realistic fashion. The valley is obviously not an objective thing (hell, enough people liked the original BG that they actually made a sequel), but I think most people do have their own personal valley in regards to human-ness, and not everyone is eager to get over them. I have no desire to get over my revulsion just so I can sit through Baby Geniuses.

      Similarly, I think that a lot of people will have no desire to get over being creeped out by an android like this one until the utility of having one becomes too large to ignore. Again, I wouldn't have a major problem, but I can see how a lot of people would.

    9. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      True, all too true. I've worked with the physically and mentally handicapped for the past 5 years, and I can definitely confirm this. If people would just admit that the valley is there, it would be a lot easier for them to overcome it. Unfortuately, most are in denial, and as you said this a primary reason for wars and strife in general.

      Btw, I couldn't help noticing your nick. What side of the valley do you think Gadget is on? ;-)

    10. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      That's just it. The valley is different for each and every one of us. Final Fantasy: The spirits within doesn't bug me for it's shortcomings as much as it does others, for example. We all have different areas which we value and recognize as uniquely human that we slight others for when we find them missing. I took this nick because I could relate to Gadget even more than I could relate to the people around me. That still holds true. At this time I am reminded of the story where each of the two robots in a room decide that the other is the most human. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%94That_Thou_ar t_Mindful_of_Him

    11. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with you. I definitely feel the 'Uncanny Valley' applies to FF Spirits Within. My first thoughts watching the movie were 'Wow, they are not -quite- real looking. It's kind of creepy.' That was closely followed by 'Eh, wasn't the CG in FF7 better than this?'

      Just because you (and maybe a billion others) don't feel this way, that doesn't mean the concept doesn't apply. You may even be right about the Uncanny Valley having nothing to do with its poor sales. But that doesn't mean the concept was over-applied.

      I watch anime all the time and think nothing of the fact that people just aren't shaped like that. I watch FF SW and think of how odd they look. I admit, part of it is because they tried for realism where anime does not, but even if I take that into considering, they still creep me out a bit.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    12. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by operagost · · Score: 1

      Forget the "Uncanny Valley"... your post just failed my Turing Test.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, I got hungry and ate your turing test.

    14. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Just because we have learned to overcome, through repetitive conditioning, a particular instinct, it does not follow that the instinct just disappears or does not have an impact.

      I hear what you are saying, but I don't think the uncanny valley qualifies as an "instinct" that is simply being repressed through familiarity. The valley is simply a reaction to something that you are not used to seeing. The feeling of uneasiness is understandable - it is, after all, a little weird to see something appear very lifelike, when in fact it is not alive. We simply aren't used to seeing such things... But, as we see such things more and more often (and we will), that feeling will go away entirely... and children brought up in such environments will no doubt exhibit very few of these fears, because they will start out used to such sights and sounds.

      I don't think this concept is all that different from some native peoples being afraid of cameras... seeing their image captured in such a way is not something they are used to seeing, and it is understandable that that could be frightening to them. The image, after all, looks like something that is alive. Increased exposure to cameras obviously gets rid of these fears... and not because they bury it down as some sort of repressed trauma (like your soldiers in war example), but instead, they simply get used to the idea, and can logically seperate out what is alive and what is not.

      I can imagine (and, mind you, have made no effort in an attempt to back this up, even by meager google search ;) that mirrors being introduced for the first time to a native peoples may have freaked them out... would that reaction be "instinct"? And would getting used to mirrors be repression of that instinct, or simply the acceptance of something you have never seen before, but are growing used to?

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    15. Re:"Uncanny Valley" by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      I think the Uncanny Valley explains people's reactions to transvestites. Almost, but not quite there.

  14. More likely than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old news? On my slashdot? More likely than you think.

  15. Did anyone notice... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did anyone notice that both the Koreans and the Japanese have done exactly what Saber Marionette, Mahoromatic, and Cat Girl Nuku Nuku have predicted, and that is direct their formidable robotics skills to the building of more and more realistic, supple-skinned robot women?

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:Did anyone notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good thing. The next version will be able to sit or stand, but then the one after that will be able to spread her legs...

    2. Re:Did anyone notice... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Funny

      /obvious

      I, for one WELCOME our supple-skinned android overlords!

      /!obvious

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    3. Re:Did anyone notice... by iNetRunner · · Score: 2, Funny

      So T3 is a more realistic scenario over T1 & T2. *That movie had such a lack of soul that you'd think it was directed by a robot too..* Or would BSG be a better looking scary future.. ?-) *Yes..*

      --
      Store with salt
    4. Re:Did anyone notice... by Frogbert · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... I fail to see the negative.

    5. Re:Did anyone notice... by el+cisne · · Score: 1

      The AI will be so accurate that geeks will be invisible to them, too.

    6. Re:Did anyone notice... by patio11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Working at a Japanese technology incubator makes me wonder whether I should laugh politely at jokes like this or slap my head in frustration (now, for the Insightful mods, thats a fairly obvious head-slap decision). "The Japanese" haven't invested in supple-skinned robots. One research institute invested in supple-skinned robots, and got some press because it makes good copy. Meanwhile, hundreds upon hundreds of laboratories, including one which is one floor below me, have made robots to do industrial work, assist old folks, do disaster recovery, explore the sea floor, provide pet-level companionship, help people with spinal injuries walk again, etc etc etc. Its like saying "You know what Americans invented the Internet for? Duh, porn, who couldn't have seen that coming. Oh well, everyone knew Americans were crazy sex fiends, as we could have easily gathered from a representative survey of American literature like Porky's, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, and American Pie." These sort of generalizations contain a bit of truth with a whole lot of stupid. (Side note: stupid makes an excellent noun.)

    7. Re:Did anyone notice... by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      You know what Americans invented the Internet for? Duh, porn, who couldn't have seen that coming. Oh well, everyone knew Americans were crazy sex fiends, as we could have easily gathered from a representative survey of American literature like Porky's, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, and American Pie.

      Uh, wait... are you trying to say the internet ISN'T for porn. Seriously, the generalization you came up with for us Americans seems to be spot on enough to me.

    8. Re:Did anyone notice... by odourpreventer · · Score: 1

      Hey sexy mama, wanna kill all humans?

    9. Re:Did anyone notice... by ofcourseyouare · · Score: 1

      I respect your impatience with the generalisations that Westerners are prone to make about Japanese culture, but can you really imagine the US or UK equivalent of "The Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy" unveiling a machine such as this? Surely not. Politicians and bureacrats involved would instinctively know they'd lose their jobs over it.

      Furthermore, descriptions of robots as friendly and/or sexy are so much more common in Japanese sci-fi Manga and Anime than in Western sci-fi that I think you can argue that there must be a different perception of such devices in Japanese culture (and extend that argument to Korean culture, though obviously it's different in many ways).

      I think it's fair to say that Japanese culture (and I assume Korean) is a lot more comfortable than the US/UK with the idea of a friendly, sexy robot. And so it's unsurpirsing that the first small steps towards such a device should come from Japan and Korea.

  16. Does it have a pooter?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, I know it's not real.....I don't care!

  17. Wow by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

    The article is kind of light on details, but this could be pretty cool.

    Imagine the monitors in the face being combined with facial recognition software. Haven't they already made bipedal robots? Take this head, put it on one of those, teach it commands like "clean the house," "wash the dishes," "walk the dog"...it's your basic household robot. I guess you should probably throw the Three Laws of Robots in there as well, to be safe.

    As for the uses mentioned in the article...do you really need a "human-like" face just to provide department store information? Isn't that what the little touch-screens and maps are for? You'd think they'd think on a little grander scale...

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  18. World's most advanced kiosk? by corerunner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So we no longer have to deal with an easily navigable touchscreen kiosk, we get to deal with something that exhibits emotion--I wonder if that includes confusion... It's also interesting that the capabilities include "reading to children" (as if video games aren't sufficient caretakers)

    --
    "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
    1. Re:World's most advanced kiosk? by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thats a bit confusing since hearing is a much more ineffective form of communication when compared to writing...

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    2. Re:World's most advanced kiosk? by 7*6 · · Score: 1
      It's also interesting that the capabilities include "reading to children" (as if video games aren't sufficient caretakers)

      i agree, that's interesting. causes one to think about whether a humanoid robot reading to children is better psychologically than no babysitter at all. if a robot babysitter is indeed better than tv or video games then how important is human parenting or parent-child relationships?

  19. Digi-Björk? by awtbfb · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that the robot resembles Björk just makes it creepier. Maybe they should have dressed it up in a swan dress...

    1. Re:Digi-Björk? by adlib24 · · Score: 1

      There is definately something creepy about it...not really sure if it Björkian or just Kavorkian: almost alive but not quite...

  20. She's hot..... by canning · · Score: 0

    **mental note** Got to get away from the computer.

    Of course I'm kidding but it brings up an interesting thought, how many android men have been developed?

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
    1. Re:She's hot..... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Well since there was only one before this... I thought they were referring to ASIMO, but the Wikipedia article says that ASIMO is actually 11th in it's line, so what, exactly counts as an android?

    2. Re:She's hot..... by canning · · Score: 1

      I would havve assumed that AISMO would be considered a robot not an android.

      Could someone clear up the difference between an android and a robot?

      --
      I love the smell of Karma in the morning
    3. Re:She's hot..... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      By definition, all androids are male. Which kind of explains why they made it nonfunctional below the waist.

    4. Re:She's hot..... by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      "how many android men have been developed?"

      Just one that I know of, but he seems to have wandered off somewhere.
      http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/author-android-go es-missing/2006/02/13/1139679514495.html

      (Cue "Men don't ask for directions, even mechanical ones" jokes)

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    5. Re:She's hot..... by uradu · · Score: 1

      "it's capable of both education and entertainment functions"

      Hmm, I wonder which one of these two functions will be more popular once you can mail-order it.

    6. Re:She's hot..... by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Androids are made by Christians (specifically, protestants) to subvert God, for whom they have a special loathing.

      Take Bladerunner for example, USA all the way. Battlestar Galactica....well they did outlaw abortion a couple weeks ago, although so far the Cylons talk about "God's Will" more than anyone else.

    7. Re:She's hot..... by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      does the sybian count?

  21. and It is called Andrew Martin by anandpur · · Score: 0
  22. But is is Anatomically Correct? by liamcaden · · Score: 1

    is the question every lonely geek is wondering... ala "Real Dolls"

    --
    "The same thing we do every night, try to take over the world" -The Brain (Pinky&the Brian)
    1. Re:But is is Anatomically Correct? by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

      There is the Chainsaw Hands optional package...

      --
      --
  23. But the question is..... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..... Is it FULLY FUNCTIONAL in EVERY way?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_(Star_Trek)#Quot ations

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:But the question is..... by guardian653 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but as a fellow /b/-tard I can say this with certainty after looking at the pic Its a trap, I have seen quite a few in my time :(

    2. Re:But the question is..... by d4nowar · · Score: 0

      "Ever-1 can move its upper body and express happiness, anger, sadness and pleasure."

      Err... I think I'll preorder one of those.

    3. Re:But the question is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..... Is it FULLY FUNCTIONAL in EVERY way?

      Yes, in every way. When any of us Slashdot readers approaches, it makes eye contact, looks at you up and down, flashes a quick look of disgust, and quickly turns away to sip at her drink and chat with her friends some more.

    4. Re:But the question is..... by BrynM · · Score: 1
      ..... Is it FULLY FUNCTIONAL in EVERY way? (poster then refers to ST:TNG)
      When I first saw that episode, my ex-girlfriend who was sitting next to me said "Data's got to be the most complicated vibrator ever conceived! Have you seen him type? That girl is horny and smart."
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    5. Re:But the question is..... by jftitan · · Score: 1

      No... surely you are one of the better looking /.ers

      I had one girl stab herself and tell me she would be in the hospital, so she couldn't make it to our 'used to be blind date'.

      SHeeesh... I so see the AI on these improving just to do the same thing to the rest of the /. crowd.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    6. Re:But the question is..... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Is it FULLY FUNCTIONAL in EVERY way?

      'cept no voicebox

    7. Re:But the question is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Microsoft might say, "Not a bug, but a feature."

      In this case I would agree :-)

    8. Re:But the question is..... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      The Sexy Data Tango Lyrics
      by Voltaire

      If, while you're out in space, love
      You're horny as a targ
      Take a tip from a security chief, love
      That fat slut Tasha Yar
      She discovered the pleasures of Data
      He became her sexual pet

      'cause he's fully functional, and anatomically correct
      He's fully functional and anatomically correct

      http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/The-Sexy-Da ta-Tango-lyrics-Voltaire/527F42FD89452DC148256DAA0 025B8E4/

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  24. So what? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

    I would expect the second to be better than the first (done by a different team, I know). I was much more impressed by Repliee which looks much more human-like than the picture in the article.

    --
    Centralization breaks the internet.
  25. The first android being... by Z1NG · · Score: 1, Troll

    The first android being Al Gore. His positronic brain did invent the internet.

    1. Re:The first android being... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Despite the fact that he speaks in a monotone and eats only car batteries, Al Gore is not an Android.

      No self respecting mechanical would ever have sex with Tipper Gore.

      (apologies to the X-Play writers for the paraphrase)

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:The first android being... by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      You must not be married. Al and Tipper are married. Married people don't have sex. Hence Al Gore = first android. Look out batteries and old people.

    3. Re:The first android being... by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

      Z1ng is an android...

      --
      --
    4. Re:The first android being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just an idiot.

    5. Re:The first android being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been kicked in the balls recently? Would you like to be?

    6. Re:The first android being... by Z1NG · · Score: 0

      Troll? What the fuck. It's an article about androids, and Al Gore happens to have a monotone voice and in general shows little emotion. Hell, I like Gore and would have voted for him had he run for office again. For the troll marking moderators, and guy who said something about getting kicked in the balls, learn to take a joke. Whats the difference between Al Gore and a slashdot moderator? Al Gore has a sense of humor.

    7. Re:The first android being... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Please stop referring to our former Vice President as Al Gore. He is to be known henceforth as A.I. Gore. That is all.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  26. Dare I say... RealDoll (TM)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at something like that just gives me the creeps.

  27. Given recent developments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the dream of the japanese people is finally coming true! First robot tentacles, and now robot women to use them on!

  28. The Second? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    I've seen at least a few of this guy's robots...

    http://www.boingboing.net/2005/06/23/philip_k_dick _robot.html

    They seem to do everything that makes this robot a big deal. Why is it considered only the second ever?

    1. Re:The Second? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1
      The following quote from the article you linked is a phrase I had hoped to never hear in my lifetime...

      The Dick bot is a collaboration between ...
      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:The Second? by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      I have no frigging clue how the "world's second android" game is played, but maybe these guys didn't think that one counts because it's missing. Still, the same people who did PKD-Bot already made an Einstein android (The article says it has "frubber" in it!) so I think the claim here is bogus, especially since this one can't walk or anything particularly novel. Maybe they mean it's the second Asian android or something?

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
  29. Wheelchair by s-twig · · Score: 0

    I think it would look more appropriate placed in a wheelchair?

    1. Re:Wheelchair by jftitan · · Score: 2, Funny

      who would do an android in a wheelchair...?

      oh wait, this is /.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
  30. Missing the point on "Eve", and wierd eyes by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot.

    I'm hardly Christian, but Eve was also the first MOTHER. Unless this thing cranks out robot babies, they've got a bit of a misnomer.

    Also...did anyone else get a wierd feeling looking at the close-up photo of her face? I finally figured it out- she is (or looks) slightly cross-eyed. Took me a while to figure it out, but the second I saw the photo I knew something was "wrong" (a phenomenon special effects guys know all too well. You may not realize it, but your brain immediately picks up on things like shadows that aren't in the right place and stuff.)

    I believe we are especially sensitive to the messages the eyes convey. So even if this thing gives the correct answer to "where can I find the Ministry of Whatever" or "have you seen my bento box", maybe it'll really disturb people on a level they won't immediately figure out.

    I'd love to hear what all those schoolkids said in the ride home or back at dinner with Mom and Dad...

    1. Re:Missing the point on "Eve", and wierd eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd love to hear what all those schoolkids said in the ride home or back at dinner with Mom and Dad...

      Kids to Mother at Dinner Table: " Your replaceable so you better do what dad says.. " or "Daddy has a new secretary..." :-)

    2. Re:Missing the point on "Eve", and wierd eyes by JanneM · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So even if this thing gives the correct answer to "where can I find the Ministry of Whatever" or "have you seen my bento box", maybe it'll really disturb people on a level they won't immediately figure out.

      I would frankly be more disturbed by being in a country that really has a Ministry of Whatever... Maybe the Department of Nevermind can help me get over it, though.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Missing the point on "Eve", and wierd eyes by supertsaar · · Score: 2, Informative

      crosseyed:
      I once heard that puppeteers purpously make their dolls very very slightly crosseyed to generate the illusion that the doll is looking at you.
      They said that if you do not do this, the puppet will appear to have 'dead' look, or appears to be looking right through you. Maybe the Koreans tried this but overdid it?

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    4. Re:Missing the point on "Eve", and wierd eyes by spezz · · Score: 1

      I'm hardly Christian, but Eve was also the first MOTHER. Unless this thing cranks out robot babies, they've got a bit of a misnomer.

      Maybe it does. Noelle, the pregnant robot a can pump out like 5 an hour.

  31. Re:But can she do... by cryptochrome · · Score: 1
    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  32. Did anyone notice... This story on the right side? by bpd1069 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Murderous Dog Stew Lover Undone by Telltale Collar
    A discarded dog collar led authorities to a man in his 40s who had stolen a pedigree dog and turned it into the stew known as Boshintang that is still considered a delicacy by some Koreans.

    Police said a woman identified as Kim (57) on the morning of April 3 tied her pedigree dog, of a breed that sells for some US$300, in the yard of the restaurant she manages. That was the last she saw of her furry companion. Searching all over the neighborhood later that morning, however, she found the animal's collar near the door of a portakabin, home to a man identified as Song (44). Kim reported her suspicion that Song had stolen the dog to the police, who arrested the man on Monday.

    An officer with Seoul Guro-gu police station said Song was a great lover of Boshintang, and his mouth watered at the sight of the dog, driving him to steal the animal and eat it. "He probably never thought he would be caught because of the collar," the officer added.

    (englishnews@chosun.com )

    --
    --
  33. How Long by redneckHippe · · Score: 1

    'Till there's a shortage of Blade Runners?

    --
    It'll quit hurtin' once the pain stops.
    1. Re:How Long by qyiet · · Score: 1

      'Till there's a shortage of Blade Runners?
      That's not a problem, we'll just build the Blade Runners too.

      -Qyiet

  34. Wouldn't Adam be the first by neomage86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    human name in the bible? I mean from what I understand, Eve was made out of his rib ...

    1. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      human name in the bible? I mean from what I understand, Eve was made out of his rib ...

      That would depend on which of the creation myths in the old testament you chose to believe in.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by srw · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too. Except that Adam is simply Hebrew for "man," so maybe it's not really a name.

      Either that, or it's some radical feminists trying to revise history again.

    3. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but what good is a male sex robot?

    4. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Genesis chapter 2 is written from the perspective of god and calls adam simply "man". God made the man, then made the helper for him, and the man named her "woman". It's only later in chapter 3 before the expulsion from Eden, that they are named Eve and Adam. According to Wikipedia these passages are from 2 different sources.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    5. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by Arthur+Dent+'99 · · Score: 2, Informative
      What exactly do you mean by which of the creation myths? There's only one creation story in the Bible.

      Genesis chapter 1 tells the story of the whole creation, from day 1 to day 6, in very general terms. Genesis chapter 2 retells the story of day 6 and forward in greater detail. It's very clear that Adam was created first, and Eve was created from Adam's rib (Genesis 2:18-23).

    6. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Say what now? Have you even read the bible?

      In chapter 1, God creates both man and woman in his own image, they are the last thing He creates, AFTER all the animals, even. In chapter 2, God creates man, decides it is not good for him to be alone, and so creates all of the animals. But this is not enough, so He creates woman from the man's rib. They don't even get their names until chapter 3.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      erm.. my first sentence was uncalled for. But they're still two different stories. There's enough overlap and contradiction that they really can't be the same story.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the order did not change in chapter 2... it says the animals had already been created. Its the same order in chapter 1 and chapter 2. read it yourself http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Gen%20 2:18-23;&version=31;

    9. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam was male. And males aren't human, they're scum.

    10. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      And with females like you around, I think I'd rather have my rib back!

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    11. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by Jester6641 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice point, but there's more to it than just that.

      "Adam" does mean "man." Good for all of you that like to point that out. However, is it a name, too? Actually, yes. Hold on, it's going to get complex...

      1.) If "Adam" was not the name, then his name would have been given in chapter 3 when Eve's is (before then she's just called "the woman"). But since it holds through the next few chapters and even the rest of the Bible as "Adam," it's most likley that this is, in fact, a name.

      2.) For those of you Americans (like me!) who aren't used to your names meaning something, then this might come as a shock...but pretty much every name in the Bible means something somewhere. This is why Abram's change to Abraham or Jacob's change to Isreal were significant events. There are these kind of things popping out all over the place. Therefore just because a name means something doesn't mean it's not a name.

      3.) Articles are huge here. Looking at the Hebrew I don't see an article for the first time in Genesis 2:20. So? Point is, you don't put an article in front of a name. That's not how it works. But you do put an article in front of a species (think "a man" or "the man" but never "a Timmy" or "the John." Well, maybe that last one on occasion, but that's not the same).

      Having said that, the first instance of "man" is in Genesis 1:26 (and it is the same word for Adam, so you could really flip a coin to figure out if they were talking about the name or the species. Both work in context).
      The first time it is typically translated "Adam" is in Genesis 2:19, with most coming in by 2:20 and almost all in by 3:17. The 20 or so translations I checked all had "Adam" by the start of chapter 4.
      As for "Eve," that word doesn't show up at all until 3:17. Actually just a bit after the word "Adam" or "man" in that verse.
      At any rate, a few things to consider. They probably used a Korean translation over English (those jerks! Don't they know the Bible was written in King James English!) so I'm not sure where the first "Adam" would show up there. However, for logical reasons I tend to put it in 2:20 because of the article thing (point 3) and I think we'd all agree original language is probably better than Korean or English.

      Whoops. Did I just tip my hand that I'm one of those religious guys? There goes my credibility on /.. And I'd been trying ever so hard to build that up.

      --
      Jester

      Warning: This sig may be legally binding in England.
    12. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "myths" - You're not gonna give up, will you?
      "Religious wackos" claim this as truth, "secularists" claim science as truth. In any case, branding doesn't help.

      And for the topic... maybe someone mistyped or something? Eve was 2nd created human, Korea makes 2nd android, android is female, seems appropriate that way.

      And this is coming from only reading the summary.

    13. Re:Wouldn't Adam be the first by corbettw · · Score: 1

      In chapter 2, God creates man, decides it is not good for him to be alone, and so creates all of the animals.

      Actually, if you read Genesis 2:19*, it implies the animals were already created and God just herded them past Adam to find a "suitable helper". So you can read that either way, depending on your own preconceived notions.

      *No, I don't have the Bible memorized, I looked this up on BibleGateway.com.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  35. The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will she be ready for sex?

    1. Re:The real question by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      When will she be ready for sex?

      As soon as someone invents a cure for a neural net with a headache.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  36. Hmm, Slasdot..news from non-Bible readers by MshnryMan · · Score: 1

    Hmm, somebody there at slashdot doesn't have their head screwed on wrong. The quote was "The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot". I'm not sure if you were just trying to be inventive and make up a way that the name was designed or if somebody over in Korea forgot to read the Bible, but every single time I've read it, Adam was the first human name found in the Bible. Don't believe me, read it yourself!

  37. Well you see... by hackwrench · · Score: 0, Troll

    The women get robot men and the men get robot women. The robot tenticles get used on real women and the robot woment get used on real men.

    1. Re:Well you see... by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Much like this?

      --
      C|N>K
  38. Murderous Dog Stew Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay this is off topic but did anyone else notice the link to the upper right of the story, "Murderous Dog Stew Lover Undone by Telltale Collar?" I always thought that Koreans eating dogs was a myth. Any slashdotters want to confess to trying it?

    1. Re:Murderous Dog Stew Lover by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      I went to China for an Intel sponsored event once and they server dog stew. I tried a bite. It was not to my taste ... nothing like chicken ... and I also had issues with the idea of eating a dog.

      ]{

    2. Re:Murderous Dog Stew Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you said dog stew on Intel's funding. Something smells fishy about this.

    3. Re:Murderous Dog Stew Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you said dog stew on Intel's funding. Something smells fishy about this.


      You mean something smells "doggy" ;-) I hear they really are tasty.

      Oh well, for what it's worth, I'm a Korean, and I, too, don't like the idea to eating dogs, as I'm quite fond of them. But killing and eating animals is killing and eating animals, dog, cat, cow, sheep, pig, chicken (frogs ;-), or whatever.
    4. Re:Murderous Dog Stew Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      nd I also had issues with the idea of eating a dog.

      What about that little chalupa dog from Taco Bell? He looks pretty tasty.

  39. This explains why Data was male by slightcrazed · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine if he was female? "Data, I'd like to see you in my ready room for a full level one diagnostic."

  40. Who was the first? by cgenman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Keanu Reeves?

    1. Re:Who was the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was Al Gore.

    2. Re:Who was the first? by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Chuck Norris?

      I mean, he did come down from the heavens.

  41. Android by FrodoTeeBagins · · Score: 1

    Ill be impressed when she/it washes my dishes !! wait -- I have a machine that does that its called a dishwasher best of all it doesnt talk back or give me evil eyes.

  42. Ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "to introduce Ever-1 to the public. The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot."

    Or maybe the word... ever, perhaps?

    1. Re:Ever? by kh4n · · Score: 0

      "Eve" rhymes with "Steve". So, "Second Android Ever" should rhyme with "Second Android Stever"
       
        Oh, wait. Jokes aren't supposed to be dissected--I'll have to discuss this with my programmer...

    2. Re:Ever? by x2A · · Score: 1

      so would someone who's prejudiced against the Ever model of robots be called Everist?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Ever? by woolio · · Score: 1

      Erm no....

      It's the world's third android...

      Its the second one to be named Ever.

  43. Video by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Video by kertong · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link - great video.

      It's a japanese fembot, though. Not the korean one mentioned in this article.

    2. Re:Video by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      Oops yeah you're right. So then what's with the female androids and pink blazers?

  44. two female androids eh.. by spacerodent · · Score: 2, Funny

    so how long till someone adds the hot lesbian makeout subrutine

    1. Re:two female androids eh.. by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      that should be subrooting no?

      (runs away)

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  45. how lifelike is her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vagina?

  46. We're talking about face expressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so the quesiton is... Can she make the O-face?

  47. specifications don't match by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cannot move lower body but can express pleasure. Odd.

    1. Re:specifications don't match by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Cannot move lower body but can express pleasure. Odd.

      Possibly because its female. For an accurate male android, the bulk of the processing power would have to be below the waist.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  48. may i be the first to say by kh4n · · Score: 0

    i'd hit it. :)

    1. Re:may i be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, look at how sharp those knees are!

  49. South Korea?? by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice they don't say which Korea? Obviously we all know that answer, but come on!

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  50. dude, really by bobamu · · Score: 1

    no... really....

  51. Ever? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    It's the world's second andrdoid and its name is ever?

    Does that make it The World's Second Android Ever?

    Thank you, thank you!

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  52. Did they really mean... by ross.w · · Score: 1

    Evil-1?

    it's hard to tell with that accent.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  53. It's weird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to spell.

  54. But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run linux?

  55. With my luck... by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    I'd end up with the model that powers up and says "I see you as a friend" and then it walks away with the first unemployed alcoholic it sees. It *is* based on a woman, yes?

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  56. Hell yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hit it.

  57. Imagine a Beowulf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of THESE!

  58. Umm... Wrong. by 1053r · · Score: 1

    "The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot."
    Well, unless you meant to say the first *female* name in the bible, you're wrong. Adam is the first human name mentioned in the bible. Not to pick at straws, but just thought you should know.
    (Well, I guess since it's a "female" android, it wouldn't make sense to call it "adam". But still!)

    "Ever-1 can move its upper body and "express" happiness, anger, sadness and pleasure."
    Hmm... Sounds promising ;)

    "But the robot is still incapable of moving its lower half"
    Damn. :( It looks like no $1,000,000 mechanical whores for now.

    1. Re:Umm... Wrong. by x2A · · Score: 1

      It's the second name, I guess like it's supposed to be the "second" android, god knows what the submitter was on. It was made out of spare parts from the first one.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  59. Adam, Eve, names... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Bible (King James version) does not say whether God assigned Adam the name of "Adam" or not, only that he was referred to simply as "the man" until Genesis 2:19 when all of a sudden he starts getting referred to by the proper fistname of Adam, with no indication of whether God assigned Adam his firstname or whether Adam chose it for himself. Since Genesis 2:19 is also when God starts bringing all the animals before Adam to give him the opportunity to chose names for them, it kinda leaves you wondering who picked Adam as the man's firstname. My Bible however does state that it was Adam who gave Eve both her gender designation of "woman" (Genesis 2:23) and her firstname of "Eve" (Genesis 3:20), which would indeed make "Eve" the first human name assigned by one human to another.

  60. Man hands! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    She'll rule the World, crushing all with her giant man hands!

  61. And Yet ... by Melllvar · · Score: 1

    It took a collection of American scientists to invent the Robotic Tentacle. Man, the Japanese really have lost their edge.

    I think it's very, very important for the rest of us to do whatever we can to prevent our American roboticists from mingling with their Asian counterparts. For the sake of the children, if nothing else.

  62. SuperBanana is Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's kind of evil looking. Definately not something I would want looking or reading to my kids. I'll admit jumping a bit at the sight of the close-up. Just kinda creepy...

  63. Waaaaste by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forget the damned facial expressions. I wanna robot to take out the garbage, fetch a drink, and do the laundry. And WITHOUT facial expressions. Otherwise, it is a fricken ewife.

    1. Re:Waaaaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Might I suggest you keep one facial expression available.
      :O
    2. Re:Waaaaste by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What? do Mr. Bill?

  64. yes but can she... by zyte · · Score: 0

    yes, but will she show me her OH face?

  65. Then who was the world's first android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al Gore. A human could not have invented the Internet; the pr0n would have distracted them.

  66. Re:May 9: Prostitute Schedule @ MBOT in San Franci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the second time in two days I've seen this spammer post off-topic sex-ads. Hello, Slashdot?

  67. There's a secret in the hardware... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    I heard a rumor that at E3 we'll see what happens when they put five of these things together!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  68. Ever-1? by Sangbin · · Score: 1

    Best name, EVER1!11!!!

  69. Ever-1 of Destruction? by gojomo · · Score: 1

    Haven't they seen the runaway-female-assassin-robot-movie starring Gregory Hines, Eve of Destruction ?

    1. Re:Ever-1 of Destruction? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Has anyone seen Eve of Destruction?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  70. Feh by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone who's ever been in a Sex Shop could've made the same prediction.

  71. backward... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds a little too much like "reeve" when you flip it around... It'll be one of those "I can't believe we didn't see it coming" situations. August 29, 1997 baby.

  72. We all are. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Also...did anyone else get a wierd feeling looking at the close-up photo of her face? I finally figured it out- she is (or looks) slightly cross-eyed.

    I think it's something different. --Everybody is slightly cross-eyed when they look at things close up.

    I feel slightly creeped out by ALL mannequins, but since I've seen a few zillion in my life, I don't register it anymore. --But that's largely based on the non-luminescence of plastic skin, (real skin is slightly see-through), the fact that eyes don't track, and the overall totally obvious sense of fake, etc.

    Here it's a bit different; no single detail of the face looks un-real.

    I think if somebody were to pose for this shot and I was told it was an android, I'd feel just as disturbed. I think the creep factor lies in the knowing it's not real and imagining having to deal with the damned thing moving around in real life. I've seen enough scary movies about robots to feel a real sense of threat when the fourth wall is replaced with air.

    But maybe it's something different. In any case, you're quite right. It's creepy. I can certainly see how the war would have started.


    -FL

  73. Wow. I can see how the war started. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    That thing is creepy.

    I found myself reviewing my combat advantages; I'm stronger, faster, smarter, have better balance and my parts take longer to wear. . .

    For now anyway.

    Talk about basic instincts. It's just a collection of parts with a plastic skin pulled over top; A dumb toy, and yet my fight or flight responses were engaged.

    I have an idea; let's NOT build soul-less robo-creatures. We have enough organic ones walking around as it is. They bore me, creep me out, and I wouldn't want to have sex with one of them either.


    -FL

  74. Re:May 9: Prostitute Schedule @ MBOT in San Franci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cocksucker's been at it for weeks.

    Leave it to the mods, since /. isn't going to do anything about it.

  75. OMG by berenixium · · Score: 1

    Bah! Now they are building robots that look more attractive than my past girlfriends.

    I'm gonna be rejected by androids!

    "So who's your dream date, Ann-Droid, Sir Clive Sinclair? Bill Gates? Professor Stephen Hawkins?"

    "Ewww, no way. Brad Pitt or George Clooney. Or Georgy as I like to call him, when he calls me on my mobi at the weekends..."

    "Bah!"

  76. Quoting the source - Genesis 3:17-20 by Circlotron · · Score: 1

    "17 And to Adam [first occurrence of name] he said: "Because you listened to your wife's voice and took to eating from the tree concerning which I gave you this command, 'You must not eat from it,' cursed is the ground on your account. In pain you will eat its produce all the days of your life. 18 And thorns and thistles it will grow for you, and you must eat the vegetation of the field. 19 In the sweat of your face you will eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken. For dust you are and to dust you will return." 20 After this Adam called his wife's name Eve, [first occurrence of name] because she had to become the mother of everyone living."

  77. Technically this is a Gynoid by salimfadhley · · Score: 1

    Android comes from the greek root andro- meaning man. The word "androgynous" comes from the gree words for both Man and Woman and means having both male and female qualities.

    Since this machine is female in form, it should not be called an android, but a gynoid. :-)

  78. Genesis 2:19 - 3:20 by kahei · · Score: 1


    Adam's name appears a whole chapter before Eve's, for heaven's sake! While I applaud the invention of this rubbery-looking, creepy android, I think the next model is going to have to be able to sort single-digit numbers.

    P.S. Dokdo is Korean territory! Dokdo nun uri ddang! No, wait, I changed my mind. Takeshima is Japanese! Takeshima ha nihon no ryoudo -- no, wait, it's Korean! Man, I love territorial disputes, especially ones in the East Sea. No, I mean the Sea of Japan.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  79. Quite... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Why yes, I would expect very much so.

  80. Sweet! But... by rehashed · · Score: 1

    .... is it compatible with all those plugins i bought from http://www.sinulate.com/

  81. Weird eyes by Crizp · · Score: 1

    I didn't think they looked that weird. From what I have observed (ok, only in the movies) Japanese girls look kinda cross-eyed when they're focusing on you - or something less than a few meters away.

    It might be they only cast slightly cross-eyed girls in the movies though, since it looks kinda cute.

    I was impressed with the eyes on this one. Although the close-up photo is pretty low-res they seem to have gotten the iris right. I'm sure I would say otherwise if I saw this thing moving, though.

  82. Ahhh... finally!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A woman that works like a machine...

    Wait... it can't move its lower half??? ...That's just sick!

  83. OK, but... by caudron · · Score: 1

    When are they gonna announce a technology-sharing partnership with Real Doll. That's when I'll really take notice!

    Tom Caudron
    http://tom.digitalelite.com/

    --
    -Tom
  84. scary by LDSearch · · Score: 1

    it is "funny" that more human they look more scary they are.

  85. Re:Technically this is a Gynoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Since it is female in form it should be called a blood-sucking, scheming bitch!!

    OK,OK breathe ..... go to your happy place ........ OMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

  86. How is a gyndroid's face.. by murderlegendre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q: How is a gyndroid's face like a frontpage Slashdot article?

    A: There may be two other entries, just below it.

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    1. Re:How is a gyndroid's face.. by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      A: There may be two other entries, just below it.

      And they're certain to be dupes.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  87. Disneyland by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    This is s'posed to be a new thing? What about disney animatronics? Or did they not do facial expressions?

  88. Name violation by UberHoser · · Score: 0

    Check out www.applegeeks.com They already have a bot named Eve.

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
  89. Ever vs Ecks by aapold · · Score: 1

    Who would win?

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  90. Wake me up when... by Mille+Mots · · Score: 1
    ...they get around to the Cherry2000 model.

    Or, maybe not.

    --
    agenda discarded : words swirling around the room : the meeting is derailed

  91. In South Korea Androids are for OLD people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. That is true.

  92. The internet is for porn! by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    The internet is really really great...
    For Porn!
    I've got a fast connection, so I don't have to wait...
    For Porn!

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7997646050 642417046&q=world+warcraft+porn/
    Watch it! Not dirty, unless pervent, porn, and masturbation are dirty words for you or your workplace. Visuals are clean.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  93. Korea Unviels Second Android. by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    The name combines the first human name found in the Bible, Eve, with the 'r' in robot.

    Technically, shouldn't they have named it after the second name in the bible? Although the firrst name IS the second person so maybe the article just emphasizes the wrong logic?

    What does it say that this is the most comment worthy thing I got from this article?

  94. Adam is simple ancient Hebrew for "man" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The translation "Adam" is simply ancient Hebrew for "man", or in context, more loosely "made from earth". Also, "Eve" translates from "life" or "one who lives". So really, neither actually have a known proper first name, and the names by which we refer to them from scripture (Adam and Eve) are merely for our convenience and are a result of a cascade of translations of translations of translations, etc, across several languages and traditions.

    If you truly wish to study the Bible and/or the Torah, you need to learn both Hebrew and Greek, for there are many idioms and colloquialisms in the original languages that get lost across the nested translations.

  95. The level of discomfort exhibited is interesting by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember reading a sci-fi story somewhere, possibly one of Asimov's, involving androids and robots in the future. The topic is brought up that, in the story's setting, robots had to be intentionally designed to look unhuman, because people are too disturbed by robots that appear too close to humans. The replies to this article really lend support to the possibility of a scenario like that. I agree with the majority of posters here, an android that looks too much like a human would creep me out, especially if there were a lot of them. If there was just one and it was like Data or something, I may be able to get used to him after a long period of time.

    If the androids were clearly artificial in speech and mannerisms, and had that same non-human feel to them that conversations with (and I realize this is an odd comparison) IMbot porn spammer scripts have, I could never get used to them and would always be uncomfortable around them. Uncomfortable customers means low profits for someone seeking to sell these things. I think what we're likely to see is some of these fancy looking models available to the few wealthy who want them, and stripped down "robotic" looking ones doing things like helping out old people and doing maid work around the house. People don't want Data, they want Rosie from the Jetsons.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  96. But we can't have androids before... by master_p · · Score: 1

    ...the 24th century! :-)

    Does anybody have a link to a video of this "android"?

  97. Korea? by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Korea re-unified while I was asleep?

  98. MOD PARENT UP! by SSCGWLB · · Score: 1

    Wow, I snarfed coffee on my keyboard, thanks! I think the command phrase should be:
    "Smile like a donut"

    ~nate

  99. How to give the Ever-1 pleasure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the article, the robot can express pleasure? Exactly how can you give her pleasure is not explained in the article.

  100. Ever-1 obviously a play on words.... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    Ever-1 has nothing to do with the bible... whoever supplied that explanation is an idiot...

    Ever-1 == Everyone with a slight Korean accent, duh. Eve + the r in robot, please... that's the crudest attempt at decrypting a codename I've ever seen.

    It also would symbolize that she is unique and always will be, as an early model unit she will never be reproduced, ie: ever alone/unique, Ever-1.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Ever-1 obviously a play on words.... by giant_toaster · · Score: 1

      And it sounds like everyone... maybe thats what they were thinking?

  101. One word... by logik3x · · Score: 1

    WHY?

  102. It seems obvious to me... by j3one · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is named for the seccond person mentioned in the Bible, (Eve) the first of course being Adam. As we all know it was eve who first fell into temptation and then brought adam along, though he was none the less guilty. I think if things follow the mantra of japanese flicks, we should se Cain and Able shortly... Luckily for us, there is no need for us to worry about global domination yet as first we will have a war within the androids as two factions split after cain destroys able... Not to say they wont destroy humanity at a later time..

    2 questions though... will ever-2 cause problems for our crippled eve, or is this just the way lesbians have decided to take over the world, by reinacting creation with a twist.. No dudes..

    ??

    Scary...

  103. Sweet! by srk2040 · · Score: 1

    All techical advancement has been tied to porn or military. I can see a whole new area of export for Korea. RealDoll and Fembot. I wanna buy their stock and get the generation 2.

  104. Korea; Android; how do you tell the difference? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They all look alike!

  105. Re:The level of discomfort exhibited is interestin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would prefer one with inhumanly large breasts.

  106. The First Android (Japanese) that was mentioned by Monimonika · · Score: 1

    I think the first android that was mentioned in the article is the one shown in this link:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4714135.stm

    From the photos, I'd say that the Japanese one looks more life-like, but that could just be because of the close-up on the Korean one.

    Also, I think they both count as androids simply because they look (at least semi-convincingly) human, rather than anything really technically sophisticated. Check what Answers.com has to say:

    http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=android&gwp= 13

  107. Point... by Elemenope · · Score: 1

    I think, though, that the 'uncanny valley' phenomenon is not simply a novelty reaction. I think, much like other animals, humans have an 'avoid corpses!' instinct (or perhaps a more general 'avoid unhealthy looking human-like objects!' instinct). Many people are creeped out by full-body mannequins no matter how much they are exposed to them, which I imagine is why most clothing shops have switched over to partial torso/bust mannequins.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    1. Re:Point... by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      I think, much like other animals, humans have an 'avoid corpses!' instinct (or perhaps a more general 'avoid unhealthy looking human-like objects!' instinct).

      Ahh, my point exactly. People that see things that seem "alive" but are in fact "dead" confuse these two states -- dead, and alive. That is precisely where the uneasiness comes from.

      My point, is that with more exposure, these misconceptions get "nipped in the bud", so to speak. The confusion is avoided (and ultimately we are only talking about confusion here, nothing more)... People used to buying half-price, life-like robots at Walmart will no longer confuse those two states. They will simply be used to such a device, just like we seem to be comfortbale with photographs from birth in our culture.

      I know it takes some forward thinking, but what I am saying is obviously correct. Societies of the future that (assuming it eventually happens ;) exist alongside very life-like non-alive entities, will get used to the idea. It simply won't be an issue.

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  108. divine wisdom for sure... by Circlotron · · Score: 1

    God's wisdom -- name = "Adam".
    Human wisdom -- name = "wii".