Slashdot Mirror


World's Fastest Internet Cafe

Thyrus writes "An internet cafe offering connections 50 times faster than typical broadband services has opened in Cornwall. Computers at Goonhilly satellite station, on the Lizard peninsula in Cornwall, are connected to BT's global internet protocol network. That means users can download data at speeds of up to 100 megabits per second (Mbps). It is thought to be the first time such high speeds have been seen at a UK internet cafe. The service will be free to visitors."

176 comments

  1. Hmmmmmm too much hype by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, I am glad they said in the UK, because 100mbit cyber cafes aren't special everywhere.

    Also, I notice they have had to tip toe around what it can be used for:

    Adrian Hosford of BT said: "It would be possible to use the cafe's computers to download in less than 15 minutes a file the equivalent size of the DVD version of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, with its 19,000 illustrations, 629 audio and video clips and 100,000 articles.

    It seems like they are trying almost too hard to explain how quick it is, afterall, I never rate my downloads in terms of how many "dvd copies of a paper encyclopedia with illustrations and video clips" I just say its shit-hot.
    We need it in terms we can understand like how many TPG/s can we view?
    will google earth run smoothly without appearing to break up or pixelate no matter where I zoom or rotate to?
    can I wipe out my friends in CS:S by having a l33t connection?

    Another article I was reading earlier about this mentions why the special people were chosen to open it:


    The new internet café will be officially declared open by Helston Community College pupils Chloe Smith and James Evans, both aged 17, who have demonstrated outstanding acumen in the field of information technology.

    from here.

    (Yes, sisco appear to be hyping this more than the BBC, but then again they supplied some of the high tech equipment.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Hmmmmmm too much hype by tomknight · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the best part of the Cisco release: "The first antenna, known as Arthur, was built to track the Telstar satellite and received the first live transatlantic television broadcasts from the United States in 1962. Arthur today is a grade II listed building and is still in operational service." Now I might be bit of a saddo but I actually found that interesting.

      --
      Oh arse
    2. Re:Hmmmmmm too much hype by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny
      It would be possible to use the cafe's computers to download in less than 15 minutes a file the equivalent size of the DVD version of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, with its 19,000 illustrations, 629 audio and video clips and 100,000 articles.
      But how much is that in Libraries of Congress?
    3. Re:Hmmmmmm too much hype by revlayle · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...I never rate my downloads in terms of how many "dvd copies of a paper encyclopedia with illustrations and video clips"...

      That's exactly correct. You measure them in "Library of Congresses"... duh!

    4. Re:Hmmmmmm too much hype by BcNexus · · Score: 1

      Yes, to sum up your point: What is the latency? And besides, the user's experience also depends on the computer on the other end serving the content.

    5. Re:Hmmmmmm too much hype by Ansonmont · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is the UK. Maybe "Transcripts from the house of Commons"? Or "newsprint devoted to Princess Dianna's"?....
      -A

  2. In other news by utopianfiat · · Score: 5, Funny

    The world's biggest Adult Theater is opening up next door. Coincidence?

    --
    +5, Truth
    1. Re:In other news by sjwest · · Score: 1

      newsflash: The MPAA and RIAA both tell George W Bush where Bin Ladin is.

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember this inside Goonhilly, BT's hub of international communications. Its in the middle of nowhere (by UK standards) http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&sll=37.0625, -95.677068&sspn=31.371289,62.578125&q=helston,+cor nwall&ie=UTF8&ll=50.049589,-5.179882&spn=0.099205, 0.244446&t=h&om=1. It opens as a tourist attraction 10-6 in summer (and not at all for much of winter). Your hardly going to build anything nearby. Its also a nature reserve!

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the reason is that adult entertainment prefers to build in remote places where the clients have a low risk to meet their acquaintances accidentally, and the seashore makes it a resort. The cable companies need remote places with a low concentration of backhoes, and the transatlantic cables terminate at the seashore. In fact,a major transatlantic fiber cable terminates just north of Atlantic City, NJ, which is the center of casinos and adult entertainment on the East Coast.

  3. World's fastest? by kestasjk · · Score: 0

    Is this really the world's fastest? It doesn't seem that fast; in Japan they're getting gigabit connections at home.

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    1. Re:World's fastest? by bcat24 · · Score: 3, Informative
      RTFAS (Read The F***ing Article Summary):
      It is thought to be the first time such high speeds have been seen at a UK internet cafe.
      Emphasis mine.
    2. Re:World's fastest? by utopianfiat · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the article is "World's Fastest Internet Cafe" according to ./ mods. ... but then again we know how reliable they are, eh?

      --
      +5, Truth
    3. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this really the world's fastest?

      UK != the_world

    4. Re:World's fastest? by bcat24 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Damn, "at a UK internet cafe" was supposed to be in italics. Oh well.

    5. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should probably RTFFHFPNTTI (Read The Friendly Formatting Help For People New To Teh Intarweb).

      Don't worry, Iin no time at all you too will get a grasp of basic inetrnet-formats like HTML and no longer embarass yourself.

    6. Re:World's fastest? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      What is this ./ ? I don't know how reliable ./ is, do you ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:World's fastest? by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      RTFAH (Read the f****** article headline)

      Sorry, I mean, I know this guy clearly didn't read the summary, but in his defense, the *headline* does say "World's Fastest Internet Cafe." Clearly, the people who write the ./ headlines need to read the article summaries.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    8. Re:World's fastest? by newt0311 · · Score: 0
      stupid US needs to catch up.

      *enviously looks in general direction of Japan*

      I want GigE internet. I have sooooooooo many uses for it (and not pr0n).

    9. Re:World's fastest? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, hey, tentacle hentai doesn't download itself...

    10. Re:World's fastest? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone's nicked your emphasis, mate. And before you ask, it definitely wasn't me.

    11. Re:World's fastest? by RetepMc · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be RTFFFHFPNTTI, you can guess what the extra "f" is for.

      --
      PtPete
    12. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      World's fastest in the UK! It's like those sports that only one country compete in. Every national champion is automatically a world champion. But UK, sorry to say it, you're not the only one with Internet and netcafes

    13. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like a cite for Gigabit connections in Japan - is this really the download link speed? What kind of pipe are they using for the provider?

    14. Re:World's fastest? by raatti · · Score: 1

      Indeed. What started as a gaming servers and Internet-cafe service (http://www.avatar.fi/) has now evolved into a full-fledged ISP (http://www.tnnet.fi/) with FAST connections. TNNet is FICIX (http://www.ficix.fi) member (Finnish IX point). Requirements include linking onto FICIX-1 and FICIX-2 points, 2 connections and gigabit conn is minimum. So they have atleast 2 Gbps of bandwidth there, also mentioned in http://www.avatar.fi/verkko.html where it is introduced in Finnish. Each of the computers at the have have their own, unshared 100Mbit connection. Now thats speed compared to that slow UK Cafe. TNNet as growing local ISP also have gigabits of foreign connectivity bandwidth also avaiable, making the UK place look like 14400bps.

    15. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yes it does (UK==world)

      now scurry off somewhere you silly little man

    16. Re:World's fastest? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seconded. I also wonder about this with regards to the 100BT connections quoted in reference to the UK cafe. If the backhaul is only 1Gb, then I hope they don't have more than 10 clients connected when they're quoting 100Mb.

      If I saw a cafe advertising "Gigabit Internet Connections," my immediate suspicion would be that they have either: (in order of decreasing crapitude)
      A) Gigabit links to each machine, and then some shitty 128kb backhaul
      B) A Gigabit backhaul, and then 10/100 links to each client
      c) A Gigabit backhaul, and then Gigabit links to each client

      The third case might, I suppose, be borderline honest, since theoretically if you were the only person in the cafe, you could enjoy gigabit speeds to the Internet, but that's barely practical. Although I suppose given the advertising of most consumer internet connections (advertising "burst" rather than continuous throughput, etc.), it's not as bad as it could be.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    17. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it should work using the tag, as opposed to the tag. That's the way to add emphasis properly, anyway.

    18. Re:World's fastest? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      It is thought to be the first time such high speeds have been seen at a UK internet cafe.

      Are you seriously claiming that there are no research universities with internet cafes that don't use gigapop Internet?

      Look, we all use it to do remote telesurgery, splice genomes, and other fun things - and I'm pretty sure Cambridge is just one of many such research universities on our gigapop backbone that are located in the UK.

      And I'd be really suprised in none of those university/college locations didn't have such a gigapop cafe, since we have tons of them here in the US on research university campus locations.

      That said, South Korea is already wired - the entire country - at that speed, so World's fastest is an interesting and unlikely claim.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    19. Re:World's fastest? by rylin · · Score: 1

      That's how one of the Internet Cafés in Stockholm are doing it.
      They've got the local place wired gigabit (with the funny exception of their servers, which are on 100Mbps feeds), but the external pipe is 10Mbps..

      It's funny what a nice spin you can put on things.

    20. Re:World's fastest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you're not the only one with Internet and netcafes
      NOOOO WAAAAYYYYY!!!!1

      You freaking *IDIOT*! *GOSH*!!!
  4. Can't be cheap? by neonprimetime · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The service will be free to visitors.
    61 dishes


    For how long will it be free? I can't image the 61 dishes being cheap to maintain?

    1. Re:Can't be cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this rated interesting when poster is comparing Japan home connection to an Internet Cafe. The title specifically states worlds fastest internet cafe.

    2. Re:Can't be cheap? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Informative

      the 61 dishes were there already.

      Its a massive communications centre.
      the cafe is just a tiny part of it which they have hooked into the direct net feed.

      Like having the microwave at springfield nuclear power plant linked directly to the reactor core.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Can't be cheap? by utopianfiat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember, if you don't pay your tab, you might have to wash the dishes...

      --
      +5, Truth
    4. Re:Can't be cheap? by hauntingthunder · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wow

      they finaly got a cafe - a while back the staff used to moan like crasy about the closeure of the staff resturant - I belive all that was left was a chip van that called on wednesdays.

      Real question does the caff do engineering breakfasts

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
    5. Re:Can't be cheap? by Thwomp · · Score: 1

      And here is where it is. Although it never used to be that blurry, previously you could just make out some of the dishes.

    6. Re:Can't be cheap? by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Why do you want a satellite picture? Try this.

    7. Re:Can't be cheap? by RemovableBait · · Score: 1

      What the article doesn't make clear is whether this is free to visitors to Goonhilly Earth Station itself or just the cafe. Having visited myself, I suspect it's the former.

      I can assure you, BT are making plenty of dough from visitors to the station. The entry prices aren't exactly cheap for what you get; an adult costs £6.50 (or $12) and a family ticket is £20 (or $36). I wouldn't worry about those dishes falling apart any time soon.

    8. Re:Can't be cheap? by tomythius · · Score: 1

      Like having the microwave at springfield nuclear power plant linked directly to the reactor core. But with the added advantages of not having to fight a path through protesters. Oh, and a hell of a lot less carcinogenic.

      --
      Tom says so, QED.
    9. Re:Can't be cheap? by alef.01 · · Score: 1

      ...and it's censored from Google maps/earth!

  5. Not that impressive by CBHighlander · · Score: 5, Insightful

    100Mbps connections are not that uncommon. Besides, it's the overall download speed that counts, and that is often determined downstream from you local connection. The bandwidth bottleneck is rarely (if ever) your local connection speed.

    1. Re:Not that impressive by rkww · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to wikipedia the cafe has a 1Gb pipe. The 100Mbit connections are to the desktop.

    2. Re:Not that impressive by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 3, Informative

      grandfather poster was pointing out that it doesn't matter what speed the cafe has if you're grabbing a torrent of the latest Harry Potter movie from a 40KB/s source in Bumbleskunk, Ohio.

    3. Re:Not that impressive by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      That is why this is so good. It is going right to BT's backbone. The only bottleneck should be on the server end.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Not that impressive by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      ah, but just think how fast you could suck down a well seeded torrent such as the Debian Sarge DVD...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  6. They forgot... by JoeLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, you have this blazingly fast connection at the internet cafe...

    What server, gaming or otherwise, will be able to transfer information that fast back?

    I do have to say that this connection would be perfect for the final destination for the "relaying" internet connection in the $100 MIT laptop.

    Joe

    1. Re:They forgot... by 1984 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually there are a few that can. Our office network is piggybacked on our mid-size data center, which has enough upstream link capacity that the 100Mbit/s desktop LAN is the slow bit. Downloading Apple software updates (Akamai), various Linux ISOs from mirrors (for example) we get several MByte/s throughput onto the desktop. Never *quite* maxing out that 100Mbit/s portion, but above 50Mbit/s.

      That's in San Francisco, so YMMV, but there are sites out there that can feed at high rates and don't seem to throttle too much.

    2. Re:They forgot... by flithm · · Score: 1

      Uhh plenty. 100 Mbits isn't all that fast in terms of non-consumer internet connections.

      Basically what happens is a game company either brings in a commercial line, or co-locates a server. For smaller titles it's probably the latter in which case they'll likely have anywhere from single OC3 to multiple OC192's worth of bandwidth (but pay per byte).

      If it's a big title, they might bring in their own line (I can't say how often this would happen though) in which case they'd have the entire thing to themselves and could saturate connections even better.

      Think about it this way. You yourself could colocate a server for 4 or 500 bucks a month that could max out at about 9953.28 Mbit/s (that's 1.2 gigaBYTES per second). Of course if you did that constantly you'd owe your left AND right nuts to the bandwidth usage fairy.

      So to sum it all up... almost ANY server will EASILY saturate 100 mbits.

      100 mbits is nothing man.

    3. Re:They forgot... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Ok, you have this blazingly fast connection at the internet cafe...
      What server, gaming or otherwise, will be able to transfer information that fast back?


      You apparantly haven't used many usenet servers that host binaries ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    4. Re:They forgot... by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      No one server can. But it's an internet cafe. While you may not be able to max out that connection alone, a cafe full of people can. Especially when they all are interested in maxing out the speed (While the hype lasts, atleast) or just viewing lots of videos.

      Oh, and gaming servers wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a decent DSL connection and these fat pipes. You rarely need broadband for online games. Gaming sites like FilePlanet, though, that host the latest demoes (You know, the ones that are bigger than full games used to be) could feel the hurt if a couple of these cafes decided to download that new 1.5GB demo...

    5. Re:They forgot... by n17ikh · · Score: 1

      Exactly - while at university everyone has a 100 Mbps ethernet link to the college LAN and by extension the internet, and through my usenet subscription I nearly always got around 70 Mb/sec. Granted, I had to open up about 10 connections at once - no single TCP/IP connection could sustain that kind of speed across the internet without getting packet mangled and QOS'd to death - but I still got that kind of speed.

      --
      Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
    6. Re:They forgot... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      What server, gaming or otherwise, will be able to transfer information that fast back?

      Camfrog. Each video stream takes up 50KB/s and that's PER PERSON WATCHING YOUR LIVE VIDEO FEED. I can chew up 2 terabytes of bandwidth in less than three days with a popular Camfrog chat room of my own.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:They forgot... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Hehe, the sysadmins at psu hated me with a passion. Filled 900 gigs in less than 24 hours a day or two before I left - and they didn't have enough bandwidth to begin with.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  7. in other news... by revery · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, if they notice a suspicious looking network cable snaking out to the curb and in through a barely opened car window, it might mean that this former St. Petersburg, Florida resident has moved to the UK, and is, apparently, still not a coffee drinker.

    1. Re:in other news... by Huff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Problem is that the cable would also have to traverse several miles of dirt tracks, cross several miles of sheep infested fields and dodge hundreds of trac'ers and comboine 'arvsters ohh arrr

      Huff

  8. Moving in... by infosec_spaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    So...it is free for guests, what if I want to move in? Would I have to pay for it :o)

    --
    ----- I have bad karma for a reason! -----
  9. YES! by gerddie · · Score: 5, Funny

    bistromathics is the answer. Finally, they understand ...

  10. I think not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the "I think not!" part :P

  11. 100mbit? WHY? by Ossifer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the purpose? Reading emails really quickly? I mean what kind of activity (other than nefarious) does one really need that requires that speed, when sipping coffee?

  12. Free super-fast internet... by celardore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But how much does a cup of coffee cost??

  13. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Downloading starbucks latest revenues figures?

  14. Goonhilly? Lizard Peninsula? by bunions · · Score: 4, Funny

    are you kidding me?

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  15. Yihaa, finally by Bromskloss · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I can download inordinate amounts of images and movies to.. my screen? Or can you take it with you somehow?

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Yihaa, finally by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      Duh, floppy diskettes. They're small, cheap, durable (just don't put them near magnets, powerlines, or small children... don't drop them... and... basically don't even handle them), and you can hold 1.44 MB per disk!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    2. Re:Yihaa, finally by TheBiGW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been there not so long ago. All the PCs are iMacs (there are about 15 in total). The base units are locked away in a 'pod' display type thing so there is no access to USB ports or floppy discs or anything like that. Whatever you download you can't take with you. Also it's fairly heavily censored using a websense based proxy so don't think for a second you'll be downloading hundreds of megs of mp3s or anthing like that.

      --
      Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for an hour. Set him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  16. Is it still that fast? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it me or does it look like that backhoe just took a big bite out of the dish in that picture? Wonder how many megabits you can get with a a 5' section missing from your receiver?

    1. Re:Is it still that fast? by dotdevin · · Score: 1

      That is just one of 61 dishes :)

    2. Re:Is it still that fast? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 3, Funny

      well... 60.75 apparently

  17. Net Neutrality by Gotung · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    An internet cafe can find a way to make money while offering service like this for free to it's customers.

    And yet the poor ol' telecoms are having such a hard time making money due to Google stealing their bandwidth.

    Bandwidth that both Google and end users already pay the telecoms for.

    1. Re:Net Neutrality by RobK · · Score: 1

      Instead of charging google, telcoms should claim they've got the fastest connection to google and yahoo and aol to encourage users to pay for service through them.

      I'll tell you I'll vote with my dollars and in time, others will too.

      When google video stops working because my ISP is trying to squeeze google, I'll find another ISP.

    2. Re:Net Neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference here, is that the entire site including the internet cafe is owned by the incumbent telco in the UK - BT. The site is also the major landing point for transatlantic fibre and cable coming into the UK, besides all the satellite capacity. This is probably the cheapest place in their network for BT to offer a 1Gbp/s pipe.
      The internet cafe there doesn't have to make money itself, it is probably sufficient for it to pull a few extra people into the visitors centre that BT operates there.

    3. Re:Net Neutrality by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      You made me think of an interesting idea. Maybe this whole net neutrality thing is like a bunch of penguins lining up on the shore, pushing each other until one falls in. They're daring each other to make their networks non-neutral. The first one that "falls in" will be the guinea pig. If it works, everyone else will jump in, but if the polar bear of consumers eats it alive, the rest will be there to take over his market share. No one wants to be the first in that case, but if it's safe, no one wants to be the last either. So they just keep getting closer and closer until one finally falls in.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  18. obquote by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny

    I first heard of Goonhilly from a hardly-noticed story I once read. Not being a European, I had to look it up at the time to see what the hell it was.

    The planet beneath them was almost perfectly oblivious of their presence, which was just how they wanted it for the moment. The huge yellow somethings went unnoticed at Goonhilly, they passed over Cape Canaveral without a blip, Woomera and Jodrell Bank looked straight through them -- which was a pity because it was exactly the sort of thing they'd been looking for all these years.

    No real relevance, I just like the name Goonhilly.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:obquote by booch · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing. Us Americans aren't very familiar with the names of British satellite receiving stations. These are the only 2 references I've seen of Goonhilly.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:obquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I doubt being a "European" would help much.

      I only know where it is because my family live down the road.

  19. Re:100mbit? WHY? by bedessen · · Score: 1

    Because it was an already existing center of high speed data connectivity and so they thought it would be a nice perk to set up a few PCs in the lobby and run a free internet cafe. It's not like they took an existing regular internet cafe and then decided it should be 100Mbit.

  20. wtf? by breckinshire · · Score: 5, Funny
    Computers at Goonhilly satellite station, on the Lizard peninsula in Cornwall...
    Really, now, you HAVE to be making this up...
    1. Re:wtf? by rilister · · Score: 1

      remember, people:
      Internet cafes in "GOONhilly": funny.
      Internet cafes http://www.tullys.com/stores/store_list.asp on "SHATtuck Avenue, BERKeley": not.

      --
      'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
    2. Re:wtf? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, "peninsula"? Do they think we're stupid?

  21. Re:100mbit? WHY? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    One needs 100Mb to the desktop to advertise BT and Cisco's superiority in press releases.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  22. Goonhilly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's an odd name. I'd have called it "Chazzwazzer".

  23. Bigger question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And does it run Linux?

  24. This screams publicity stunt by 99luftballon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would you need a connection that fast in an internet cafe? Users will be checking mail and news, not downloading "Cornish gone Wild" Vol 3.

    1. Re:This screams publicity stunt by jcern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      of course it's a publicity stunt, but that's usually what advertising is. judging from the amount of attention it is getting it's probably worth it. i mean, it's free to the users so why should anyone complain. and besides, all things being equal, if you had a choice of two cafes - one with a much faster free connection, and one with normal dsl - most people would tend towards the faster one (assuming the coffee is the same price and quality and that it's not 100x more crowded).

    2. Re:This screams publicity stunt by wilfire · · Score: 1

      There is a small problem with this though. I have been there, its so far out of the way its silly. Its not in the kind of place you could ever just pop in to for a coffee. People only go there for the visitors centre, or when they realise its raining over the Lizard (Most southerly point in the uk) IIRC the place has been having lower and lower visitor numbers for years, so it pretty much is a publicity stunt. Wil

      --
      Anti gravity, but don't positives and negatives attract, humm a flaw me thinks.
    3. Re:This screams publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "downloading "Cornish gone Wild" Vol 3"... that's the one where the lovely lasses eat a healthy meal and brush their teeth afterwards, right?

    4. Re:This screams publicity stunt by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Users will be checking mail and news...
      Not when they're in the U.K.'s Fastest Internet Cafe, they won't.

      I just hope they built this place with an easy-to-clean floor.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:This screams publicity stunt by Squeak · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in the area, I popped in for a coffee (and to have a look around the satellite station site). Although this has has only just hit the news it was open back in at least early May. All the computers are Apple Macs, and the place was full of schoolkids on a trip, blasting out downloaded music.

      --
      This sig is a figment of your imagination.
    6. Re:This screams publicity stunt by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      How about a VPN connection to the office at LAN speeds for transferring files and accessing databases when out and about? I'd love 100Mb/s at home.

  25. I can't read that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cornwall. Goonhilly. I kept reading those as Cornhole and Goonwall.

    1. Re:I can't read that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, are you especially stupid?

  26. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading Mail Really Fast? Don't bother to use the internet, just do "rm -rf *"... Sorry, I had to tell.. :-)

  27. It's British Coffee by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Unless they're doing better than average, they'll be stuck with the stereotype that their coffee is as bad as American beer....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:It's British Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The British climate is not well suited to growing coffee, so we have to import it all. As a result, we drink the same fucking coffee the rest of the world does - Nescafe, Illy, Starfucks, you name it.

  28. I wonder what the ramifications are... by geerbox · · Score: 0

    It's not purely a 100 mbit thing. But in terms of unaccountable internet usage, internet cafes generally do not record their user's information, and the opportunity for abuse or misuse is certainly there.

    Let's say that someone who's created a devastating virus decides to release in the wild. When it gets down to it, when the authorities *really* want to find out the responsible person(s), it's still possible to track the virus back to it's originating source.

    What if the person decided to release his virus through an internet cafe? There are no personally identifiable information, especially if the person waltzs into a cafe he/she has never been into, puts down money, and puts up the virus. What happens then? I realise this could happen with unrestricted free wifi, but an internet cafe is a public area that's open for business - with wireless routers strongly recommending passwords before allowing wireless use, the platform for this sort of abuse is lessening (unless of course it gets hijacked, but that's of a different concern then).

    What sort of larger abuse could present itself from larger bandwidth? Especially when your infrastructural guru consists of young, unexperienced techs?

    1. Re:I wonder what the ramifications are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      geerbox, meet the UK's extremely pervasive use of CCTV systems. CCTV systems, meet geerbox. Internet cafes tend to have cameras. Expensive equipment + random people = need to protect expensive equipment, and in real terms that translates to marking it, locking it up, and pointing cameras at it. And they tend to keep the tapes, at least long enough to notice.

      Hell, if you look, there are stories about Nigerian spammers sitting in a cybercafe with their laptop, being clocked in real time by angry sysadmins who happened to be in the neighbourhood, shortly followed by police (said spammer, with SendSafe still running right there in the system tray, then proceeds to unsuccessfully try to eat their USB pendrive).

      No. Cybercafes, especially high profile ones like this, are by and large very poor choices of a suitable place to do such a nefarious thing.

      Besides, it wouldn't matter worth a damn. Anyone who did their homework has known about Warhol and flash worms for years now, and realises that it's not the upload speed of the initial seed that counts, it's the upload speed of the first tier. You could hypothetically launch stuff through a wardrived wireless LAN, without a problem, or even slower networks; even dialup is enough.

      And any VXer working to the current fads would release through a multi-proxy chain to an existing, slowly-infected (sometimes manually-infected) first-tier command-and-control botnet, to the rest of the wider second-tier botnet which would seed the worm's release in a distributed fashion.

      And then when they have control of a bunch of machines, they rent it out to spammers, do DDoS extortion with it, and password stealing, and spyware/dialer installation affiliate scams, and credit card fraud, and fly-by-night child pr0n hosting and pretty much every other manner of other nasty stuff you can possibly think of doing with a bunch of random machines. Think distributed computing, only a little dumber, and a lot more nasty.

      Oh, wait. That's exactly what they do already. Damn.

      So in summary; no, you do not need high bandwidth to do nasty things. It doesn't even really help. You need low profile to do nasty things, and cybercafes are not, despite common misconceptions, really all that low profile. Most of the VXers that have tried releasing from cybercafes got arrested. Enough said.

    2. Re:I wonder what the ramifications are... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      So just set up across the street, where you are out of range of their cameras, and use a cantenna http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantenna to extend your range if needed.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:I wonder what the ramifications are... by geerbox · · Score: 0
      So in summary; no, you do not need high bandwidth to do nasty things. It doesn't even really help. You need low profile to do nasty things, and cybercafes are not, despite common misconceptions, really all that low profile. Most of the VXers that have tried releasing from cybercafes got arrested. Enough said.

      What you're saying about CCTVs might be true in the UK, but I know for a fact that isn't the case in many of the internet cafe's I've seen in Asia. There are many low profile ones around, and I don't think it's a common misconception to note that security in some of these are less than perfect

      Could you also happen to quote VXers who have been arrested from cybercafes? I'm certainly not saying that you're wrong, but it would be interesting to read something like that, on how they nab the person.

      Finally, as intimated in my parent post, I don't believe that internet cafes are the platforms for abuse. I'm just saying that the opportunity is there, noting that internet cafes are public areas that generally require only payment and not identification.

  29. BT by booch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    BT's global internet protocol network

    That may be the most verbose/obscure way of saying "the Internet" that I've ever seen. And why do they imply that BT owns it?

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:BT by lisaparratt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, you do realise the Internet is made up of more than one network, right? And that many of the networks making it up are own by telecoms companies, like, ooh, I dunno, BT? And that some of these companies are multinational, and so have networks that spread across the globe? These companies also have other networks, running other protocols other than "Internet protocol".

    2. Re:BT by TheBiGW · · Score: 2, Informative
      The whole place is owned by BT. I've visited and there is BT branding everywhere.

      The 100mbit is probably with reference to the LAN the PCs are located on. When I surfed on the iMacs there it certainly didn't feel like the fastest internet surfing I've done.

      --
      Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for an hour. Set him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:BT by tumbleweedsi · · Score: 0
      That may be the most verbose/obscure way of saying "the Internet" that I've ever seen. And why do they imply that BT owns it?
      OK, here's Internet 101.

      A network running internet protocol is not necessarily The Internet. The Internet is a network running internet protocol however BT have a network running internet protocol which is part of The Internet and although they do not own The Internet, they own their own internet protocol network.

      Let me break it down for the idiots. If you create a network using internet protocol as your method of transporting your data (a company LAN for example) they you have an internet protocol network. If you make that a huge global network using all your own kit they it is a global internet protocol network. If you peer it with other internet protocol networks and allow their traffic to flow over your network and you pass traffic over their network then you become a part of The Internet.

      The Internet is made up of a lot of internetworked systems. BT happen to be a tier 1 carrier so they connect up a whole bunch of smaller networks and peer with other large networks. Goonhilly is their main UK satelite earth station where they have loads of large dishes which beam voice and data traffic all over the world. If you are plugged directly into BT's global network you are basically on one of the backbones of The Internet and are as close to the heart of it as most people get allowed to be.

      Goonhilly is owned by BT, the BT global IP (internet protocol) network is owned by BT and to a certain extent that whole large chunk of The Internet is owned by BT. Sever BT's network from The Internet and they still have an internet (notice the use of upper and lower case), just not a part of The Internet.

      So do you get it? BT don't own The Internet however they do own an internet which is part of The Internet.
      --
      Be nice, sponsor me: http://jailbreak.ragabonds.org.uk
    4. Re:BT by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      The bottleneck is now the iMac. The fast connection is overwhelming the poor little guys...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  30. -Yawn- by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Who cares? I can barely tell the difference between my old 4 megabit connection and my current 10 megabit connection. Servers can't even typically send it that fast. It only comes in handy when I'm doing multiple downloads at the same time.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:-Yawn- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I have a 100 megabit connection and have got well over 50 megabit real world speeds on many occasions. Mostly downloading software from companies like Sun or Microsoft (windows update etc) who have kickass net connections themselves, but also from gaming servers run by ISPs (auto-downloading maps) and even occasionally from popular torrents.
      Plus I'm connected to the same service as my workplace, so moving files to or from my workstation will max out the connection.

      Also, if you're a gamer, latency is a big deal and connections that don't mess around with ADSL etc tend to have lower latency. I typically get 20ms pings to several game servers, I think it helps that I'm pretty near London.

      It sounds to me like your ISP sold you 10 megabits but didn't give you the contention ratio or connection quality to utilise it.

  31. BitTorrent, of course by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    Haven't you been reading Slashdot recently? There was an article about Bittorrent getting gigabit worth of capacity.

    ...

    Besides, even old people in Korea get gigabit access in their cybercafes these days :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  32. "The service will be free to visitors..." by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The service will be free to visitors.

    "Visitors" or "customers"? There is a distinct difference, mainly the latter pays money to the business for some coffee and gets the internet perks along with it.

    1. Re:"The service will be free to visitors..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Visitors" or "customers"? There is a distinct difference, mainly the latter pays money to the business for some coffee and gets the internet perks along with it.

      The former gets to pay a ~ $12 entry fee.

  33. Article is garbage - don't read it by netpixie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I was really hoping this wasn't going to get to Slashdot. A puff peice for a rubbish company's lame attempt to join the 20th century that makes everyone concerned look like a total dick.

    "download data at speeds of up to 100 megabits"

    Goodness me! Thats almost as fast as the networks in Korea .... 10 years ago.

    Those sort of transfer speeds really are making the UK a major player in internet use. I think we're upto 193rd in the world now and with the pace of network acceleration as it is, we should be over taking Eastern Samoa (192nd) sometime within the next decade.

    The truth is, network connectivity in the UK is beyond a joke. The easiest way (outside university) to transfer more than a couple of meg is to sent a CD through the post. Even if you are "blessed" with a home wire that can go at more than 56k then you are still stuck with operators who put a ZX Spectrum at the other end and charge you through the nose.

    And there's one obvious culprit for who sorry shebang. The same one who restricted the use of ISDN by exorbitant charging, the same one who wants to charge me 100 pounds to "install" a wire I can see already comes into my house, the same one who used to produce CDs that required a full reformat of the hard disk after use, the same one who sat on its fat arse collecting money when the rest of the world was installing better infrastructure. BT.

    1. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And there's one obvious culprit for who sorry shebang. The same one who restricted the use of ISDN by exorbitant charging, the same one who wants to charge me 100 pounds to "install" a wire I can see already comes into my house, the same one who used to produce CDs that required a full reformat of the hard disk after use, the same one who sat on its fat arse collecting money when the rest of the world was installing better infrastructure. BT.

      Huh? I thought slashdotters blamed everything bad on the US.

    2. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      As an interested outsider (USian looking at a possible move to the UK in a year), what's the situation outside of BT? From what minimal research I've done, the cable folks seem like a reasonable bunch (heck, they offer way more bandwidth for less cost than I'm currently paying the AT&T extortionists [my apt building signed a contract granting exclusivity to AT I am so happy about that!].). Is there something about them that rules them out as a packet provider? I seem to recall there being WISPs, at least around london, are they a reasonable option?

      (More generally, how is the IT climate in the UK? I can read the job sites and look at colo prices and so on from afar, but that doesn't give me the pulse of the place like being there would. I'm a sw engineer and sometimes *nix admin, to give you an idea of the sorts of things I'm looking at.)

      Sorry to bombard you with questions. :)

    3. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by lebski · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sounds to me like you haven't been around much for the last few years. Alright UK internet access isn't the best but unless you live right in the middle of nowhere you can certainly get ADSL speeds. 90% of uk households according to this (alright I've never heard of them but it was this or theregister).

      Personally I get 8mbs (theoretically) more like 6.5mbs in practice. Where I live you can get up to 24mbs if you feel like it. Telewest (if they are still called that) are trialing a 100mbs connection to a few select areas and offer 10mbs to their other customers. Let's be honest it's nothing like your description.

    4. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by netpixie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They're all rubbish and try to fleece me at every opportunity.

      I could add more, and am interested in continuing the conversation but think that it should be moved off the board.

      my id is
      cim20

      and my mail server is metropolis-data.co.uk. Email from yahoo, hotmail and aol will be ignored.

    5. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      If you are not pround enough to call yourself an American, then you need to leave.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by drspliff · · Score: 1, Informative

      ** roudy MP style cheers **

      Here here, this is the same company that fixed the price of most dialup services in the UK (read non-0845 services), then promoted their horribly under-reliable service with nightmarish support for just a little less (or trying to pursuade you to setup an account when you setup your phone line).

      Then did the same with ADSL, while I could get 25mbit in France for 30 euro, I was paying ~30 euro for 256kbit in the UK when the bandwidth used by the people in France was likely passing THROUGH the UK before getting to America, so they can't bitch about bandwidth being too expensive.

      In my latest flat I phoned up BT to get a phone line, 75 quid and about two weeks to get it installed.. Called up NTL instead and had phone and 2mbit cable within the week without any additional charges. BT can do anything they want to try and improve their image, but as long as they still fuck customers over there will still be web forums full of thousands of angry customers.

    7. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Grandparent is talking shit. I've got a 10 meg cable connection here in the UK and it'll max out whenever the remoter server is up to it. I usually get bittorrent running over the 1000kb/s mark, pulling in 300 meg in around four minutes or so.

      Customer support is as always understaffed. But I've never had a problem with them. Perhaps no more than 24 total hours of outages (that I know of) in five years service.

      Job-wise, things are pretty good right now. Been better, but has been worse (.com bubble). London pays more but they'll get it back out of you (and more) with the cost of living there. Try Scotland, we're much more fun!

    8. Re:Article is garbage - don't read it by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      If you are not pround enough to call yourself an American, then you need to leave.

      Now why would I want to go lowering myself by adopting the American label?

      I'm a Texan ! :D

  34. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Monster_Juice · · Score: 1

    Win XP Service Pack 3

    --
    Slashdot +1 funny -4 Insightful +1 informative -2 Redundant
    Karma: Somewhere between SCO and Microsoft
  35. Can't Wait by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't wait to do this wirelessly on my 802.11b notebook.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  36. Re:100mbit? WHY? by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    What's the purpose? Reading emails really quickly? I mean what kind of activity (other than nefarious) does one really need that requires that speed, when sipping coffee?

    So far, everybody's response to you has been sarcastic, but I can see a reason why. With the way cafes are heading now, it's no longer just a place to get a cup of coofee. You can buy music and videos now in some of the cafes in the US. Not to mention the fact that most cafes are already filled with laptop users and not much else. I can imagine a time when IPTV takes hold that you would be able walk in, get your latte and panino/whatever, site down and be entertained over that connection.

  37. :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goonhilly? Lizard Peninsula? Seriously?

    You forgot to mention that this is the first Internet cafe with speeds of up to 100Mbps that is located entirely within a Lemony Snicket novel...

  38. How many LOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes but how many Libraries of Congress can it download in 15 minutes?

  39. is it so fast that... by johnty · · Score: 1

    pages show up before you've typed them into the address bar?

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
    1. Re:is it so fast that... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "In Socialist England, porn finds you!"

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  40. I went there last summer by maw3193 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The activity centre was quite boring, as was the tour, and the selection at the cafe. The gift shop was a complete sell-out, they sold telephones! Anyway, the cyber cafe was not a pleasant experience, mainly due to the 'new' keyboards. They're made of pressed metal, like public phones, meaning that you can't achieve any decent typing speed. The keyboard is missing the ALT key, instead they had the bright idea of replacing it with a "www." key. The keyboard was embedded into the wall and was at a very steep slope, making it difficult to get around. There was some arse-backwards system where, if the web browser is closed, it locks out until a technician logs you back in. While the bandwidth makes it seem like a good idea, what good is it, when there is no access to portable media. Quick streaming media is it's only advantage, and when it backs out into the cafe, porn is completely out of the question.

  41. Practical Limitations? by g1gg13r · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how useful this will be in practice. Just because YOU have the bandwidth to be able to download X bits/second does not mean that the server(s) you are getting data from can upload at that speed. If I could get as much download speed over DSL as my ISP claims, I would be very happy; however, more often than not, the download speed is restricted not by my ISP, but by the server (either due to actual bandwidth restrictions, or due to explicit download rate restrictions enforced by the server).

    Even if you could achieve those download speeds, would your hard disk be able to keep up with storing the data that quickly? My computer has trouble keeping up with download speeds of 1 Mb/s.

    1. Re:Practical Limitations? by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      Huh? Even if you mean MB and not Mb, that sounds strange. What kind of computer do you have? Both my current one (which is fairly modern) and my old box (with some 6-year old HD I forgot the specs of) can handle downloads at about 12MB/s without any problem (on my 100Mb connection).

  42. All Right! by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    Somebody go start up a Counter Strike server on those puppies.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  43. 4 gig connection in 2001 by skidv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A company I worked for (now closed) delivered 4 gigabits of ethernet connectivity to the buildings it lit in 2001. We designed and built our own gigabit ethernet DWDM injectors to link in-building Cisco 3508 switches with Cisco 6509 switches in the CO. One of our customers was Web2Zone (an Internet Cafe) at 62 Coopers' Square. We never saw the kind of bandwidth spike that indicated they used even 1/1000th of the bandwidth, except when they caught code-red or some such Internet worm. We believed that the limitation was the destination server bandwidth. To compensate for slow servers on other providers, we made extensive use of static page caching to speed performance and reduce our bandwidth costs.

  44. Better satellite picture by Fzz · · Score: 1
    Virtual Earth has much better resolution here

    - Fzz

    1. Re:Better satellite picture by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Virtual Earth has much better resolution here

      Looks like Google needs to do some catching up.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  45. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, on my Cable connection it did take me about 3 hours to download XP Service Pack 3, so 100Mbps would help cut that down..

    Wait, we're talking about Vista right?

    ZING!

  46. Doesn't say how much it costs by ravee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The article left out one significant item that all are interested in. It doesn't say how much it costs for a person to use their facilities .

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
    1. Re:Doesn't say how much it costs by crazed+gremlin · · Score: 1

      Once again, RTFAS (Read The F****** Article Summary)!!!!!!! FREE FOR GUESTS

    2. Re:Doesn't say how much it costs by sanjed · · Score: 1

      When it comes to using the facilities, I usually spend a penny.

  47. I've been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, I've been to Goonhilly. It is a tourist attraction. The literature implies that you will be able to see the working equipment and learn about the networks and their history. This is, in fact, not true. There is a short tour, centred on a promotional video that is extremely light on technical content. There is no museum and no opportunity to see any working part of the site. There isn't even an observation window onto the NOC. Even nuclear power stations allow you to see the control centre.

    The whole thing is deeply tedious and the thought of a 100Mbit cyber cafe does little to persuade me to return - particularly as the machines will probably be completely locked down and it won't be possible to do much beyond check your BT-Yahoo email. Urgh.

  48. With "Web 2.0", bandwidth doesn't help as much by Animats · · Score: 1

    "Web 2.0" sites tend to constrained by server load, not outgoing bandwidth. With all that extra server-side work, servers are busier than ever. Notice how many more sites load slowly today. Sometimes you'll even see a page load stall because some JavaScript is waiting for an ad server. (Watch the bottom bar in Firefox to see what you're waiting for.)

    For overloaded database-driven sites, page load stalls make the Web look like it's 1997 again. Craigslist is really hurting during busy periods.

  49. Open for Business by Billosaur · · Score: 1
    The new internet cafe was officially declared open by Helston Community College pupils Chloe Smith and James Evans, both aged 17.

    It has been named the Goonhilly House of Porn. Blank CDs and boxes of tissues will be on sale in the lobby.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  50. Re:Goonhilly? Lizard Peninsula? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Goonhilly" is actually Cornish for "Hunting Downs", an area of Downland where people would hunt for food.

  51. Cool place to launch something by robmit · · Score: 1

    "Computers at Goonhilly satellite station, on the Lizard peninsula in Cornwall" Is this a real place or a fictional location in a Harry Potter novel?

  52. Okay anybody but me find this funny? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    "Computers at Goonhilly satellite station, on the Lizard peninsula"
    Is that next to Sunshine island on the peppermint sea?
    I have to say that I wish I could get that kind of bandwidth here.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  53. That kind of speed is common in homes here. by piotrr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since December of last year, Swedish ISP Bredbandsbolaget have upgraded all 10mbit customer feeds to 100mbit downstream (10mbit upstream) connections free of additional charge. For this connection, I pay 350 Swedish Kronor per month, and this news would never turn up on the Slashdot front page.

    Bredbandsbolaget serves over 300 000 households in Sweden, a nation of around 9 million. It's not some curiosity out in the boondocks or goonhills or whatever you call'em.

    --
    / Per
    1. Re:That kind of speed is common in homes here. by rylin · · Score: 1

      You should live in a HSB apartment, 295:- per month for me here! :)

    2. Re:That kind of speed is common in homes here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have 100/100mbps flatrate here for 50sek/month (the rent was increased by 100sek/month when we got the connection and now we pay 50 additional cost if we want flatrate).

      I live in a cheap studio-sized apartment (1 room + kitchen), and the rent is not expensive (approx 3000sek/month).

      When the "housing organization" (poor translation by me, "bostadsförening") buys bandwidth and equipment from the ISP it's usually very cheap for the inhabitants compared to if you're buying ADSL or similar technologies as a private individual.

      btw, 50sek is approximately 7 US dollars.

  54. It's exactly that kind of thinking... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    that's keeping the average US broadband speeds so low. What company in their right mind is going to ramp up their speeds noticeably higher than their competitors if the potential for piracy is so high? In fact, couldn't offering such blatantly huge bandwidth be falsely viewed as facilitating piracy under laws such the DMCA?

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  55. Cue the Gekko.. by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    'Ello.. You're probably wondering what I'm doing here at this Internet Cafe Grand Opening. Well, the cheap bastards at GEICO have cut my hours, so I'm going for a bit on the side...So, let's get the word out, eh? Free rate quotes? They suck. Now, yer high speed internet cafe, that's the ticket mate. It's like a party with the whole world invited.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  56. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and 640 k ought to be enough for anyone.

  57. Am I missing something? by maxrate · · Score: 1
    I have a 5 Mbit/sec x 800kbps cable connection at my home, a 6 Mbit/sec x 768 kbps DSL connection at my work, a T1 1.5/1.5 connection at my work and a 155 Mbit/sec OC3 connection at my work. They ALL seem to run about the same speed when I surf the web thru them.


    When I download I notice that the 155 Mbit/sec fiber connection really pulls the data in. I only reliably see this downloading from tucows or while I'm doing a windows update -- otherwise I'd say most of everything we do here is remote desktop, email, web, etc. The 100M connection won't matter much. I bet it would help with games, but it being a satellite station (if that's where the net comes from) I gotta wonder about the latency. Seems to me a T1 would perform better than a satellite 100 meg connection for gamers.


    Whatever, another waste of time /. article.

  58. naming conventions by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    Cornwall. Goonhilly satellite station. on the Lizard peninsula.

    Is the ministration of funny names next to the minister of funny walks?

    Just curious...

  59. Well for one thing,,, by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It enables them to connect to links like this quickly.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  60. "The service will be free to visitors." by vear · · Score: 1

    "The service will be free to visitors."
    ...and paid for customers.

  61. Re:Goonhilly? Lizard Peninsula? by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Monster Island" was already taken...

  62. Re:Goonhilly? Lizard Peninsula? by bunions · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Judge: In that case I sentence you to a lifetime of horror on Monster Island. [to Lisa] Don't worry, it's just a name.

    [Lisa and others are chased by fire-breathing monsters]

    Lisa: He said it was just a name!
    Man: What he meant is that Monster Island is actually a peninsula.

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  63. Two wrong things with World's Fastest Net Cafe by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    1 - everyone in South Korea has gigapop Internet - same speed as what you just quoted - and they have Internet cafes with similar speeds. Thus it's obviously not the World's Fastest, it's not the First, and it's not the only Cafe.

    2 - everyone at University of Texas at Austin, most places in the University of Washington, and everyone else who goes to a reasonable research university has this kind of speed available, including in a number of Cafes on campus.

    Oh, but if you want to claim "World's Fastest Commercial UK Cafe not part of a research University or College" - go for it!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. Re:100mbit? WHY? by rylin · · Score: 1

    Let me tell you a story about the rest of the world, or, well - my little corner of it (namely Stockholm, Sweden).
    We have 5 or 6 major internet cafés in this little town, and all but one of them have 100Mbps pipes.

    What's the purpose?
    Maybe it's because our idea of a internet café is a gaming center with 100+ stations.
    Most games these days "require" more than a 512kbps pipe to run properly.

    The one I used to work at saw peak traffic of around 50Mbps, regular traffic was around 30 - 35Mbps.
    When you get a 100Mbps pipe for a few hundred euro per month (note: this is commercial grade pipes, no overselling), you might as well go for that - it's great advertising.

    In other words, Internet Cafés = Gaming Centers = Internet Cafés.

  65. The world's fastest cafe by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    where a cup of coffee and a doughnut you wanted are waiting for you even before you even make your order. Oh, and they also have an internet of some sort.

  66. Re:Goonhilly? Lizard Peninsula? by bunions · · Score: 1

    I'm lolin' @ the "insightful" moderation. :)

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  67. <i> tag considered broken by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    slashdot css changes broke the 'i' tag for reasons of their own. they wanted to do something retarded with 'blockquote' i believe.

    i stands for italic and should be implemented as italic. if you don;t have italic you can implement it as nothing. yes you are entitled to change the 'em' it means emphasis and is implementation dependent ie it's up to the browser and/or the css how emphasis is shown. but i should not have been changed.

    the parent poster was quite justified in getting it wrong.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  68. real world terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many albums per second is that?

  69. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you downloaded Service pack 2? That and get your cable checked. 3 hours is way too long.

  70. That's just not true by Catullus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry, but you're just wrong. While the state of high-speed connectivity in the UK might not be ideal, we're not doing badly and the rate of broadband uptake in this country is higher than pretty much everywhere else. You might have been right a few years ago, but things are much better now.

  71. Be warned by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    This is the UK we're talking about here. By coffee they probably mean instant Nescafé. No, that'd be London. This is as far as you can get from London in the South West. So we're probably talking about instant coffee from some non-name brand, the equivalent of Rola Cola. Whatever, it's probably not worth traveling there for either the coffee or the internet connection. Probably nice scenery though.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  72. Re:100mbit? WHY? by sfurious · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean what kind of activity (other than nefarious) does one really need that requires that speed, when sipping coffee?

    You don't drink much coffee, do you?

  73. Goonhilly? by stevebrowne · · Score: 1

    I find it damn amusing that there is almost as much mirth about the name Goonhilly and Lizard Point as there is disinterest in the rest of the story. And the funny thing is that this is from people who live in the same country (possible the same state) as places such as: Coxsackie, Frog Suck, Monkey's Eyebrow, Sugar Tit, Shafter and the simply great Wanker's Corner.

    http://www.philbrodieband.com/jokes-jokes_town_nam es.htm

    --
    stuff goes here
  74. Re:100mbit? WHY? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

    From my understanding 1080i requires over 20Mbits/sec throw in 1080p and higher capacities, maybe better frame rates and we can max it out today. What about background torrents? Caching other movies perhaps? Something like RDP with video support? Streaming US Channels through your RDP session @ home to your cafe in england? How about actual work, data intensive work? 100 megabyte binaries flying around? I could go on and on, no matter how much bandwidth you dream up there will be far smarter people dreaming ways to max it out.

  75. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Ossifer · · Score: 1
    You don't drink much coffee, do you?
    Not since I left Sweden...
  76. Re:100mbit? WHY? by Ossifer · · Score: 1
    Let me tell you a story about the rest of the world, or, well - my little corner of it (namely Stockholm, Sweden).
    Ah, Tjockhult...

    We have 5 or 6 major internet cafés in this little town, and all but one of them have 100Mbps pipes. What's the purpose? Maybe it's because our idea of a internet café is a gaming center with 100+ stations. Most games these days "require" more than a 512kbps pipe to run properly.
    Ah, I see, but are these 08's playing together/against each other?

    The one I used to work at saw peak traffic of around 50Mbps, regular traffic was around 30 - 35Mbps. When you get a 100Mbps pipe for a few hundred euro per month (note: this is commercial grade pipes, no overselling), you might as well go for that - it's great advertising.
    With such prices, why don't these gamers have home connections?
  77. "World's" Fastest? by greeze · · Score: 1

    Here in Korea, the last two apartments I've lived in have come with 100 megabit internet connections pre-installed. Activate service, plug in the ethernet, and go. World's fastest, my fat pasty butt.

    1. Re:"World's" Fastest? by snoggeramus · · Score: 1
      my fat pasty butt.

      Spoken like a true geek.

    2. Re:"World's" Fastest? by greeze · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that the width of my ass is directly proportional to the speed of my internet connection. Why do you suppose that is?

  78. Fast food by mattbrundage · · Score: 1

    New meaning to the term fast food?

    --
    Matthew Brundage
    Silver Spring, MD
  79. Re: tag considered broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <em> still works

  80. Geekerz by KagatoLNX · · Score: 1

    I operate a Cybercafe (along with two partners) in Springfield, Missouri USA.

    We have 100 megabits of upstream bandwidth. I've sustained downloads of more than 50 Mbps.

    The scary thing is, we get that kind of bandwidth at T1 prices here from our local utility company (ignore the prices on their site, they're way out of date).

    --
    I think Mauve has the most RAM. --PHB (Dilbert Comic)
  81. Quick Summary of this pointless thread ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To save you having to read too much idiocy, here is a short recap of all the posts:

    1) The Brits put an internet cafe next to a major communications node, and noted that it was fast; 1Gb upstream link - 100Mb to each system.

    2)The /. article made it look like it was 100Mb all through, and titled it (incorrectly) as a 'world's fastest', though this had not been claimed.

    3) Scandinavian countries pointed out that they had this (and better) already. So did Korea, and several others.

    4) A lot of people wondered what you could use such a link for.

    5) Some Americans, for whom geography is not a strong point, thought the name of the communications node was funny.

    End of precis. A typical day on the /. circuit. That's all, Folks.