Slashdot Mirror


DHS to Send Widespread Alerts

MarsGov writes "The Department of Homeland Security is gearing up to be able to periodic test 'alerts' to cable television stations, satellite radio, as well as any text-capable device — PDAs, cell phones, and web sites." From the article: Some glitches remain as telephone companies and other networks grapple with potentially trying to alert all of their customers at the same time without jamming their systems, Lawson said. But the alerts could be transmitted by text messages, audio recordings, video or graphics, he said, opening the possibility of sending out additional detailed information to specific sectors, like hospitals or emergency responders."

265 comments

  1. Invasion? by cb8100 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, if the U.S. gets invaded I'll get an SMS saying "All our base are belong to them?"

    --
    My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    1. Re:Invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invaded? Nah... All Your Base Are Belong To Us will be flashed across the nation after a 13 year old hacks into the system. Oh! And then he'll use it to DoS re-runs of Friends! ;)

    2. Re:Invasion? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      More like "You belong to all our base" -- so much catchier than "Greetings from your Local Draft Board"...

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    3. Re:Invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly, "All your base to us". Anyone else need another verb in the summary?

    4. Re:Invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      More like when the US invades another nonterrorist country at the whim of our benevolent Chief Executive.

    5. Re:Invasion? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Only if they outsource software development to a Japanese game company!

    6. Re:Invasion? by Bugs42 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hey, could be worse - could be an SMS saying "OMGZ!! We R t3h pwnd!"

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    7. Re:Invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im in ur base killin ur mans lawl

    8. Re:Invasion? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Only if the invasion is unsuccessful. If they pull it off, you'll get a Counterstrike-style splash-screen that says "Terrorists Win" followed by some guy named "pH33r 4LL4h" calling you a n00b... let the spawncamping commence!

    9. Re:Invasion? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's outsourced to an Indian company it'll read "All your base are belonging to us!"

      (Apologies to my Indian friends if you're reading this. I just couldn't resist.)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    10. Re:Invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, if the U.S. gets invaded I'll get an SMS saying "All our base are belong to them?"


      and later on you'll receive the corresponding t-shirt : "my contry got invaded and all i got was this lousy t-shirt"

  2. kind of scary by Twillerror · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as I think this could help in the event of disaster, I hope that some legislation is passed to limit it's use. It would be very easy to abuse it for propogand purposes.

    1. Re:kind of scary by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention possibly clogging up vital pieces of infrastructure that would be most needed in an emergency...

      "We're sorry, your call cannot be completed as dialed, this cell node is currently attempting to send 104,000 SMS messages..."

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:kind of scary by wondafucka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wait. I thought that propaganda was DHS's job.

    3. Re:kind of scary by mrxak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can only seeing something like this causing panic. "UR IN DANGER RUN 4 LIFE" getting sent to thousands of people all at once can't possibly be a great way of alerting people to an emergency. At least with television alerts they give you a decent amount of information, but text messenging, especially at this large a scale, any message sent would probably not be able to include a lot of information.

    4. Re:kind of scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      As much as I think this could help in the event of disaster, I hope that some legislation is passed to limit it's use. It would be very easy to abuse it for propogand purposes.


      And legislation will stop this... how?

    5. Re:kind of scary by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      and 5 minutes later a 2nd SMS saying:

      No, the OTHER way!


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    6. Re:kind of scary by dougman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly you did not RTFA. It states, "Only the president can order a national emergency alert" and "The new digital system will update the emergency alerts planned -- but never used -- during the Cold War in the event of a nuclear strike". More legislation...uggh.

      While you can pretend to predict what will happen, over 55 years of history (this program started in 1951) shows that it is unlikely to be used. Only the President can issue the alert and the current President didn't on 9/11 or any other time since. Other than your own FUD, what reason do you have to believe that it will suddenly be used for evil?

      Again, DHS is updating the technology to deliver the same old message (which they apparently have yet to send).

    7. Re:kind of scary by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm on a couple of these kinds of lists already.

      I've been on the the CERT lists (and the Old system for 9 years now, and they have never abused the system to my knowledge. Granted, CERT is only for computers, but it is similar to some of the new proposed lists.

      I also signed up for the Safe Community Alert Network, which is some sort of private-public partnership between SBC/ATT & various other organizations. Various government State, County & City agencies in California have referred me to ScanUSA.

      ScanUSA does send me Amber Alerts, notifications about nearby fires, etc. However some of those Amber Alerts & Fire Alerts are from San Diego, which is 500 miles from me. Not very relevant.

      The vast majority of the messages have been spam-ish -- I got notifications about the COPS program (COPS uses *very* agressive fundraising techniques), non-urgent warnings regardiing West Nile Virus, reminding me to wear sunscreen, and notifications about upcoming meeting for the County Health Department.

      Here's the kicker: I'm only signed up for "Critical" alerts. I shouldn't be getting any of these--- but I do.

      I would never sign up for SMS alerts from this organization. Way too much Spam.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    8. Re:kind of scary by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1
      And I forgot to mention something--

      Each of these email alerts looks something like this:


      Subject: ALERT: Something bad happened

      Something bad happend. This is a short 1 line message.

      To see this alert, please click on the following URL:

      http://www.scanusa.com/alert/something/something


      So, they send you an email regarding the alert, but don't describe any DETAILS about the alert. Instead, they ask you to click on a URL. Often, the URL doesn't work, because the server crashed under heavy load --thousands of people all clicked on the URL at the same time!

      Why not just put the details inside the body of the email message.
      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:kind of scary by geobeck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be very easy to abuse it for propogand[a] purposes.

      Unlike the regular news media, which has never been used for propaganda purposes, of course.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    10. Re:kind of scary by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Only the President can issue the alert and the current President didn't on 9/11 or any other time since. Other than your own FUD, what reason do you have to believe that it will suddenly be used for evil?

      You have to ask yourself "it they never use it, why do they need the power to send data to every phone/tv/swiss army knife in the country?"

    11. Re:kind of scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How many people actually follow the current alert system by DHS? Maybe when the color chart was first unveiled news reports and comedy sketches did but it's largely ignored now. The emergency broadcast system test at least interrupt the program and at a minimum get people complaining that it is interrupting their show. In the event of a real need to alert people, trying to build a system "then" is too late.

      Now I'm not sure, like others have posted, that text messages are necessarily the best method (can only fit so much in a text message) but maybe it would at least provide an alert to check other news sources.

      Jim

    12. Re:kind of scary by dougman · · Score: 4, Informative

      AFAIK, it hasn't been used on a national scale, but the EBS has been activated over 20,000 times at the local level since 1975 (http://www.fcc.gov/eb/eas/FCC-94-288.pdf). I've heard tornado alerts over the system several times in my life, and frankly getting it via cell phone text message would be an asset.

      Here's a couple articles on the subject in the event you were honestly wondering.

      The Emergency Alert System (EAS) page
      National Alert System In Disarray
      The Partnership for Public Warning

      Facts that can be found in the above links:

      President Truman established CONELRAD in 1951.
      President Kennedy established the EBS in 1963.
      President Clinton established the EAS in 1995.
      Clinton Administration updated the EAS to all digital in 1996.
      President Bush began procedures to amend the EAS rules to include Digital Media Technologies on November 3, 2005.

      With all due respect, you're spreading FUD, not FACTS.

    13. Re:kind of scary by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the "Amber Alert". Noble enough intentions, but the almost daily alerts made it offensive. Now we're down to 1 or 2 a week. Still annoying. And they're still working on reducing it.

      I couldn't imagine getting DHS texts every week, and having my cell account charged. That would suck.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    14. Re:kind of scary by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

      This just sounds like part of the recent Executive Order on Emergency Alert System updates. Will they now interrupt your tivo realtime? Is this a bad thing?

    15. Re:kind of scary by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      Only the President can issue the alert and the current President didn't on 9/11 or any other time since.

      I'm sure if "My Pet Goat" wasn't such a gripping tale, he could have torn himself away from the book and actually, you know.. done his job.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    16. Re:kind of scary by szrachen · · Score: 1

      Oh, but think of all of the great laughs that would get generated by imposters fooling their buddies.

    17. Re:kind of scary by Nikker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This has got to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard of. How can the end user really count on a SMS to be authentic? The only way for this to work is .... if the phone companies filter out all SMS that could be construded as DHS spoofs and who is gonna have to pay for this ? YOU. Will it be cheap? Nope ... why should it be?

      I know this is a rant but the more they want to tell you how terrified you should be today what ever the medium they use becomes governament policed. So one by one they take over forms of communication as your best intrest.

      Now the question is what happens when someone comments on homland security using these mediums? The governament has to question if your comments have anything to do with them and if so could someone on the other end *possibly* construe you comment as theirs. This is where evreything starts to go down hill IMO. Good luck anyway

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    18. Re:kind of scary by d2ksla · · Score: 1
      Not to mention possibly clogging up vital pieces of infrastructure that would be most needed in an emergency... "We're sorry, your call cannot be completed as dialed, this cell node is currently attempting to send 104,000 SMS messages..."

      Not exactly, there's something called "SMS Cell Broadcast": http://www.gsm-modem.de/sms-cell-broadcast.html

    19. Re:kind of scary by kimvette · · Score: 1

      There is a HUGE difference.

      CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and the rest show the biases of the majority owners of each network, and not propoganda from the government. Granted, at times the media may pander to their preferred administration or against the administration they would rather not see in office, but that is not government-controlled and therefore not the same as what you imply is happening in the media.

      Example of "propoganda:" state of the union address, however, the media companies nearly always follow such events up with their own recap which basically promote their own agendas, sometime in agreement with the administration, sometimes against, but in each case it shows that the media companies are their own entities and not government puppets.

      At least, here in America. In Russia with state-funded Pravda (is Pravda still state run?), The UK with state-funded, BBC, etc. things may not be the same. Are those media companies invariably promoting the political elite of the minute, or do they criticize them? If the latter, then obviously media is in control and it's not government propoganda, but more of an issue of another entities "rah rah" proselytizing.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    20. Re:kind of scary by eikonos · · Score: 1

      Not to mention possibly clogging up vital pieces of infrastructure that would be most needed in an emergency...

      "We're sorry, your call cannot be completed as dialed, this cell node is currently attempting to send 104,000 SMS messages..."


      They obviously don't understand that the cell network is not something you just dump something on. It's not a truck. It's a series of tubes. And they don't understand those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when they put those message in, everything is going to be delayed.

    21. Re:kind of scary by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      The Department of Homeland Security told me to HATE YOU!

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    22. Re:kind of scary by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      Only the President can issue the alert and the current President didn't on 9/11 or any other time since.

      I know that hindsight is 20/20, but perhaps the President should have issued the alert on 9/11, what with our nation under attack by the enemy and being drawn into an endless and scopeless war on terror.

      Okay, maybe that was a little bitter. Still, I think that 9/11 probably warranted use of the emergency alert system, at least until all the air traffic was officially grounded. So, if the existing alert system wasn't used then, what would have to happen in order for an expanded alert system to be used? (Well, unless you consider implementation as being 'use,' the result of which is FUD and promotion of DHS and the administration.)

      Now, we do have many many more mediums of communication, and I think that updating of such a system could be valuable, if that system was going to be used for anything. History tells us it will not. Hell, most towns still have weekly air raid siren tests - I know those are used for tornado warnings in the midwest, but what does everyone else use em for?

      The systems to generate FUD are costly, and remain long after the FUD they were intended to create has passed.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    23. Re:kind of scary by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      I have a theory that the reason emergency response was sort of slow on 9/11 (including use of a system like this) was that no one thought it was an actual attack and by the time everyone did it was already well known. I mean the first plane hit, and there was news converage because the media was more thinking it was an accident / disaster rather than a deliberate attack. By the time everyone figured out it was a real and focussed attack, using the system would be akin to telling a person who's stop dropping and rolling that they're on fire.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    24. Re:kind of scary by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      The problem with having the alert text in the actual email is that it can't be updated. Having a brief summary of the problem in the email, with a link to further information is actually the better way to do it, instead of having to rely on several update emails as more information becomes available. Perhaps this is an area where an RSS feed would be a better fit though...

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    25. Re:kind of scary by hazem · · Score: 1

      Didn't some congressman complain about getting a whole cellphone network in his voice mail?

    26. Re:kind of scary by Sarcastic+nerd · · Score: 1

      LOL...Ted Stevens eat your heart out. If I had mod points...

    27. Re:kind of scary by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      Eh, I don't buy that. I was at a tire shop that morning, watching TV in the waiting room. Plane #1 had already hit, I heard about that on the radio. Nobody really knew what was going on. I watched plane #2 come in. At that very instant, I knew that the events unfolding were not accidental. If I knew it was a real and focused attack, I'm certain that the president knew.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    28. Re:kind of scary by chrish · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it takes a lot of time to sound out all those words.

      --
      - chrish
    29. Re:kind of scary by deviceb · · Score: 1

      .. hey, have you seen the current president? ha.. what the hell makes you think it would not be used for evil. Don't get me wrong.. I'm all for Evil, i just do not want any text message from that goofy monkey.

      --
      Kill your TV
    30. Re:kind of scary by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      And by that point, so did everyone else. The first plane hitting was all over the news long before the second plane hit. That was my point, by the time the government figured out it wasn't an accident, so did everyone else.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    31. Re:kind of scary by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      Okay, fair enough, but I think you may have just made my point in another way as well. Considering that the existing press and communications media did a good enough job of alerting the public to the threatening events of the day - so much so, in fact, that use of the emergency alert system was not warranted - what do we even have an emergency alert system for (at least on the national level, where DHS is intending to expand the system)?

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    32. Re:kind of scary by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess what I was trying to get at is that 9/11 was a unique emergency in that it wasn't an emergency until everyone already knew about it. Contrast this to something like an actual military strike on US soil or even something as simple as a natural disaster that the public doesn't have good warning for. Specificaly I think the intent and purpose of the system is to be used if we have warning BEFORE an event happens. 9/11 happened already so the system was redundant. But if some missiles are on their way, I'd prefer to know before they hit.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    33. Re:kind of scary by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

      Or you will see a message like this: We are under attack. This message was sponsored by Nokia Connecting People.

  3. Just in time for the fall election season by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have to push the fear buttons before the fall election. It will make the difference between winning and losing.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

    1. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 0, Troll

      re: fear buttons. isn't that obvious?

      wasn't it also obvious that they stopped right about AFTER the last elections?

      gwb has NOTHING going for him (that's any good) except fear, uncertainty (and to those that can see thru him) doubt.

      the monkey-boy cried wolf once too many times, I think...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the made up fear button. Have you been to Bombay lately? (or whatever they renamed it to)

    3. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by dougman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference between winning and losing for whom? Again, everything is about "the timing" and has to have an agenda.

      First off, if you RTFA, it says, "The Homeland Security Department, through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, expects to have the system working by the end of next year." Furthermore, this is extending 1950's policy (President Truman, Democrat) to 21st centrury devices. Lastly, it has never been used and only the president can issue its usage. But hey, feel free to don your tinfoil hat. I guess only time will tell - we should follow up on this after the elections.

      What I find unfortunate is that DHS can't win. If they send out any kind of alert and nothing happens, they overreacted (even if there was a real threat and the perps simply scratched their mission once they were exposed.). If they don't send an alert and something happens, they take the blame for that. If they use it to send out emergency information on a hurricane bearing down on New Orleans... well, they won't do that right, because you believe this tech will only be used for political gain (though TFA says it may be used for natural disasters).

      Again, this is a case where the technology can be used for good or evil. Looking back at how things unfolded on 9/11, it would have been highly beneficial to have system in place to alert officials of what was happening. It is amazing how much lag there was between the time we suspected we were under attack and when all the airlines found out and began issuing orders to their pilots.

    4. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      It is amazing isn't it? Now look at who benefited from that delay and draw your own conclusions.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    5. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "What I find unfortunate is that DHS can't win. "

      I think it's a little early for you to come to this conclusion.

      "If they send out any kind of alert and nothing happens, they overreacted (even if there was a real threat and the perps simply scratched their mission once they were exposed.). "

      If you look at a timeline of terror alerts, they all seem to coincide with the release of news that was damaging to the Bush administration.

      "If they don't send an alert and something happens, they take the blame for that. "

      Has that actually happened (yet)? That's why I say it is perhaps too early for you to say that they can't win.

      "If they use it to send out emergency information on a hurricane bearing down on New Orleans... well, they won't do that right, because you believe this tech will only be used for political gain (though TFA says it may be used for natural disasters)."

      Did they issue such a warning for hurricane Katrina? I honestly don't recall if they did. If they did, kudos to them.

      If this is a tech that can be used for good or evil, based on historical evidence, I think the Bush administration will use it for evil.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    6. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Varitek · · Score: 1
      What I find unfortunate is that DHS can't win. If they send out any kind of alert and nothing happens, they overreacted (even if there was a real threat and the perps simply scratched their mission once they were exposed.). If they don't send an alert and something happens, they take the blame for that.
      Government has lost the trust of anyone who has been paying attention for the last few years. If they can't win, it's their own fault for their 'everything is political' tactics.
    7. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your statement makes an argument for the pointlessness of DHS. Simple fact, there is no such thing as homeland security. All it takes for a terrorist to blow up a mid-large sized building is a bunch of crap he could buy over a small period of time at home depot and other various places. Hell, there are recipes for explosives all over the net, RDX, C4, fuck, even Astrolite. It doesn't take some kind of a "terror network" to do something that would cause a ton of carnage and damage. It takes one individual with maybe $1000 and who is REALLY pissed.

      --
      Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
    8. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you look at a timeline of terror alerts, they all seem to coincide with the release of news that was damaging to the Bush administration.


      To be fair, pretty much any news is damaging to the Bush administration.
    9. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see New Orleans last year? Or the midwest this spring after the tornados? Grow a spine! You're going to die of something, and you have a hell of a lot better chance of dying in a flood, by a cell-phone wielding drunken SUV driver, a cigarette executive's greed, or McFood than from terrorists.

      How many people died in auto accidents in Bombay so far this year? And IIRC, the last time something like this happened in India, it wasn't terrorists but human error, and more people died.

    10. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by dougman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you look at a timeline of terror alerts, they all seem to coincide with the release of news that was damaging to the Bush administration.

      Something "damaging" is headlined about the Administration every week, if not daily. It takes no skill to "correlate" these alerts.

      If this is a tech that can be used for good or evil, based on historical evidence, I think the Bush administration will use it for evil.

      Again, FUD. This tech *has* been available to the President during his entire term. The fact that it is being extended beyond 20th century technology (tv, radio) is a natural evolution. In fact based on historical evidence, there is no reason to believe they will use it now.

      Anyhow... showing any signs of conservatism is bad for karma these days, so I'll stop now.

    11. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      McFood

      Aww, how can you stay mad at chicken nuggets? Especially now, "with real chicken!"

    12. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

      I just got a message on my cellphone: "Possible terrorist attack today by disgruntled slashdotter."
      And now for the obligatory "No Ca!$$$$aCF>JKnqwowhniuseNO CARRIER

      --
      +5, Truth
    13. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a real conservative, you'd be shocked and angered by the actions of the Bush administration.

      Fiscally, they're totally irresponsible, taking us from record surpluses to record deficits. They dramatically expanded the size of the federal government. They've asserted the right to monitor your communications without warrant or oversight. They have also asserted the right to imprison American citizens indefinitely without trial.

      You may be a good republican, but please don't call yourself a conservative!

    14. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Looking back at how things unfolded on 9/11, it would have been highly beneficial to have system in place to alert officials of what was happening

      I don't think that would have helped in the slighest, or for any future terrorist attacks. By the time the first event happens, everything else has already been set. Take the two big ones recently:

      9/11: planes were already in the sky. Not enough aircraft/missiles to shoot them down even if they wanted.

      London trains: bombs already on the trains. People can't get text messages in the subway due to fears that terrorists will use the signals t set off bombs. Oh shit, time paradox!

    15. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by sgt_doom · · Score: 2
      Looking back at how things unfolded on 9/11, it would have been highly beneficial to have system in place to alert officials of what was happening. It is amazing how much lag there was between the time we suspected we were under attack and when all the airlines found out and began issuing orders to their pilots.

      Wow!!! Where to begin. Perhaps you should just join the military, then work in a classified government (before all those jobs have been outsourced to BushCO, of course) agency to understand that that all these systems HAVE been in place for quite a few years --- but strangely enough they weren't working that day - and that very confusing exercise of the airborne attack (via airplane) against the NRO facilities that coincidentally occurred on 9/11/01 really threw people off???? Right.... And having served at the SAAM Command Post at nearby Andrews AFB (now they'e called ops centers) eons ago, they've always had fighter jets that can be immediately scrambled to protect Washington, D.C. airspace - excepting on that one fateful day, of course!

      Probably the best overall site -- check it out sometime, rube.

    16. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Did they issue such a warning for hurricane Katrina? I honestly don't recall if they did. If they did, kudos to them.

      You betcha, the National Weather Service did an excellent job. (For confirmation, see this timeline.)

      I don't think having another warning from cellphones would have made much difference.

    17. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Jeian · · Score: 1

      If you look at a timeline of terror alerts [mac.com], they all seem to coincide with the release of news that was damaging to the Bush administration.

      Correlation != causation

    18. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Jerf · · Score: 1

      If you were a real conservative, you'd be shocked and angered by the actions of the Bush administration.

      Who says he isn't?

      Some of us are capable of thinking that even if the President is not pure evil incarnate, he may not always be correct or perfect.

      One of the most repulsive aspects of hard-core leftism is how many people think in black-and-white. Extra-double-bonus-points when they accuse others of thinking in black and white.

      (Besides, "conservatism" is an under-defined term. Ironically, one of the modern meanings of "Conservative" is "Classical Liberal". When you figure that out, you're on your way to understanding the real meaning of the terms "liberal" and "conservative". (Hint: They're meaningless until defined.))

      Oh, and if you think I just accused you of being a hard-core leftist, you need to brush up on your reading skills.

    19. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Bryansix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Mod Parent as a Troll! This has nothing to do with the system the DHS is putting in place and is just silly conspiracy theory.

    20. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "Did they issue such a warning for hurricane Katrina? I honestly don't recall if they did. If they did, kudos to them.

      You betcha, the National Weather Service did an excellent job.
      "

      In this case, the 'they' was FEMA, not the National Weather Service. The timeline you mention doesn't specifically state if FEMA gave warnings. Wikipedia claims that "The National Weather Service (NWS) is one of the six scientific agencies that make up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States government." So, it is not part of FEMA. AFAICT from these sources, FEMA gave no warning of hurricane Katrina.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    21. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by kimvette · · Score: 1

      With real chicken? What were Chicken McNuggets before?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    22. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. The Bush administration has really disappointed me. Bush is NOT a conservative by any measure EXCEPT possibly morality, only, I think that he's trying to continue to pander to Christians and conservative Jews to maintain support for the GOP. I'm a registered Republican but will be looking into the Libertarian party because I believe in true Conservatism:

        - a small, limited government totally answerable to the people
        - ALL government spending should be public and not obfuscated under code names to "protect" pet defense contractors and pork projects
        - spending only what is absolutely NECESSARY
        - No welfare, support for the unfortunate should be funded privately
              - if ~50% of our pay were not extorted through taxes and "user fees" average folks could help the needy
              - absence of welfare would encourage the lazy to work (the non-lazy but unemployable can be helped by private sources)
              - the TRULY needy (disabled, etc.) should have SOME support
        - NO legislation of morality
              - As an example: marriage is a religious construct. Leave marriage up to churches and synogogues to decide. If a man marrying a man or a woman marrying a woman is "wrong" and "sinful" then let God sort it out if he exists. The state has no business in saying who can and cannot marry
              - "victimless" crimes should not be crimes. If you want to fry your brain on LSD (like Syd Barrett :( ) then you should be free to do so, providing you don't hurt anyone else in the process. Drive while high/tripping/drunk though, and injure or kill someone, that should be a capital crime because it is no longer "victimless." Oh, and no blaming your addiction on your mommy, society, or schools, either
              - Public schools should not exist. The Constitution says you have the right to an eductation, not that the government must foot the bill and provide it to you. They just cannot forbid you to get an education should you so desire. Government-funded eduction results in what we have now: lowering the standards so that "no child is left behind"

      Given what the current administration has done through abuse of the executive order, ignoring the constitution at whim, and creating a bloated government, I am extremely disappointed in the GOP, which USED to stand for the principles that the Libertarians and costitutional-based parties now embrace.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    23. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1
      But NOAA is part of the federal government, and FEMA doesn't typically issue hurricane warnings. I'm not defending FEMA's poor performance with Katrina, but the disaster didn't happen in New Orleans for lack of a warning. This is what the NWS issued on Sunday morning (changed to lower case to avoid the slashdot lameness filter):
      urgent - weather message
      national weather service new orleans la
      1011 am cdt sun aug 28 2005
      devastating damage expected

      hurricane katrina
      a most powerful hurricane with unprecedented strength...rivaling the intensity of hurricane camille of 1969.

      most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks...perhaps longer. at least one half of well constructed homes will have roof and wall failure. all gabled roofs will fail...leaving those homes severely damaged or destroyed.

      the majority of industrial buildings will become non functional. partial to complete wall and roof failure is expected. all wood framed low rising apartment buildings will be destroyed. concrete block low rise apartments will sustain major damage...including some wall and roof failure.

      high rise office and apartment buildings will sway dangerously...a few to the point of total collapse. all windows will blow out.

      airborne debris will be widespread...and may include heavy items such as household appliances and even light vehicles. sport utility vehicles and light trucks will be moved. the blown debris will create additional destruction. persons...pets...and livestock exposed to the winds will face certain death if struck.

      power outages will last for weeks...as most power poles will be down and transformers destroyed. water shortages will make human suffering incredible by modern standards.

      the vast majority of native trees will be snapped or uprooted. only the heartiest will remain standing...but be totally defoliated. few crops will remain. livestock left exposed to the winds will be killed.

      an inland hurricane wind warning is issued when sustained winds near hurricane force...or frequent gusts at or above hurricane force...are certain within the next 12 to 24 hours.

      once tropical storm and hurricane force winds onset...do not venture outside!
    24. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      While I have a tendancy towards Libertarianism, and while I enjoyed the breivty and clarity in your plateform, I can't agree with all your statements.

      spending only what is absolutely NECESSARY
      So items in the "public good" will be funded but thats it. So its really just the simple matter of figureing out what is and isnt' in the public good. right?

      No welfare, support for the unfortunate should be funded privately
      Many of your items are grand in scale, but I think your welfare system accounts for only 1% of your overall budget so why bother when their are bigger fish to fry.

      NO legislation of morality
      While I agree in principal I still think drunk drivers should face very stiff penalties, much more then now. If you get pissed and run over my kid, the sense of vengance of seeeing you face a capital offense is going to be very cold comfort. Ditto for unlawful discharge of a firearm, etc. Don't call it morality call it "laws that protect us from idiots before the damage is done"

      Public schools should not exist.
      There are many countries were this is the case, you could always visit them to see the results just be sure to leave the gated enclaves so you can get the full picture. There is nothing like a permenant uneducated underclass to destroy a civil society.

      To sign off on a postive note, I total agree with your position on same sex marriage. At one time government may have had an interest in populating the country and rewarding those who marry, these days I can't see any reason for government to be involved whatsoever. Rather then debate same sex marriage we should be redrafting legacy laws that make the definition of marriag important.

    25. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Castar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's only because the facts have a well-known liberal bias.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    26. Re:Just in time for the fall election season by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      IIRC, National Review (the Right's equivilent of the Left's "The Nation") published a column in which the writer compared Bush II to Clinton, and concluded that Clinton's policies and administration fit better with conservative ideals than Bush II's do.

  4. I can see where this goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, all we need now is gov't spamming of cell phones...

    1. Re:I can see where this goes... by winnabago · · Score: 1

      It should be opt-in, not the other way.

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    2. Re:I can see where this goes... by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      in-opt?

    3. Re:I can see where this goes... by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 2, Funny

      this is the government we are talking about, i think you mean in-ept :-P

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  5. Just what we need... by JurassicPizza · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Homeland Security Spam!

    --
    --- JurassicPizza
    1. Re:Just what we need... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Homeland Security Spam!

      (Simultaneously received on my cell phone, my Blackberry, and my in-box)

      Hello, esteemed Sir. I am Nageeb Prahook, with the Departmint of Honeland Security. We wounder if you would help us. We have $25 million in loose cash we do not know what to do with. If you could email me your bank account number, I will deposit most of it with you. Only you must send me by Western Union wire transfer a good faith payment to show you are sincere. I await your assistance. This is an official message, we did not hack into anyone's computers to send this.

  6. Interesting. by GungaDan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was an unusual "statewide administrative alert" broadcast to the TVs at the bar during lunch yesterday, and nobody knew what in the hell it meant. So much for my theory that DHS was buying the next round.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Interesting. by FLEB · · Score: 3, Funny

      It means we go into Emergency Bureaucracy. May God help us all.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    2. Re:Interesting. by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      You should've paid attention. I heard chocolate rations may be going up!

    3. Re:Interesting. by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Heh - just because it's brown and gooey doesn't mean it's chocolate, my friend.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    4. Re:Interesting. by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are 5 levels of color-coded Emergency Bureaucracy ...

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  7. now this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know these networks aren't built for 100% simultaneous utilization, so how do they decide who gets told first? The largest campaign contributors to the next president?

  8. Eh, sort of cool actually by Vokkyt · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry too much about this. It's nothing new really, just a few more devices added to the warning network. Plus, think of it this way; once the warning is over, all of those cell-phone folk who's conversation got interupted will have something new to talk about for hours on end...OMG, it's a money making scheme!11!

  9. What about hackers? by blindbug · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Although a great system, I wonder how long it will take someone to hack this system and send out a shout out to his hacker buddies and their 295 million friends?

  10. Good for Disaster Preparedness. by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A standard message format for disaster warning would be useful when prompt response could save lives. Tornado warnings come to mind as an ideal use for this. Not everyone is watching the boob tube or listening to conventional radio these days.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's this whole obsession with "saving lives"? $DIETY/$God/Mother_Nature/$var/$const/Evolution made us immortal so we would cease to exist some day or the other. And die all of us will, if not sooner, then later.

      The sooner we come to terms with this unfortunate fact, the better.

    2. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

      "Not everyone is watching the boob tube or listening to conventional radio these days."

      Although most people do have windows (as in the glass kind, not the software kind).

    3. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from someone who lived in oklahoma for 12 years, tornado preparedness is not *that* difficult. Large thunderstorms are fairly easy to tell whether they are capable producing tornados and it will be well covered on the news (tv, radio, and internet). If a tornadic thunderstorm is moving in, i would wager 90% of the residents will know about it and be ready to get somewhere safe (whether it be a bathroom, storm shelter, basement, etc). Oh, that and the abundance of tornado sirens in every populated area.

      That being said, having bad weather updates through your phone may be great for driving or if the power goes out. These services are probably already privately avaiable, especially with phones capable of accesing the internet.

    4. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about those without eyes?!? ;-)

    5. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      I believe that's why we have these things that make really freaking loud noises called "tornado sirens" whenever there's a danger of a tornado coming your way.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    6. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by chrisgeleven · · Score: 1

      A few months ago a Tornado touched down on the seacoast of NH, flipping over a truck with 2 people in it (they somehow survived) and doing some decent damage before fizzling out.

      NH has no tornado warning sirens or anything remotely close to that. The last previous tornado touched down in '98 if I remember right and was a very little one at that.

      Having a text message alert to cell phones for disasters would be really handy I think.

    7. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Except if you speak spanish or ching-chang-chong

    8. Re:Good for Disaster Preparedness. by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I guess I won't mind, as long as I can turn it off.

  11. Cool, but... by Skynet · · Score: 1

    Who is going to willingly upload their cell num/SMS to the Department of Homeland Security?

    Or do they plan to get the numbers directly from the cell providers?

    --
    Execute? [Y/N] _
    1. Re:Cool, but... by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      Or do they plan to get the numbers directly from the cell providers?
      Well, they already have your phone number.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    2. Re:Cool, but... by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      I'd think they would just send the message to the actual cell provider who would then send it to all their subscribers. It would make sense for the cell provider to have a list of all the phone numbers on their service. ;-)

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    3. Re:Cool, but... by Skynet · · Score: 1

      Tru dat. I guess I should have asked if they plan to get the numbers from NSA. :)

      --
      Execute? [Y/N] _
    4. Re:Cool, but... by Infoport · · Score: 2, Informative

      SURPRISE! The DHS & NSA (& CIA, FBI, DEA) already have your phone numbers!

      Read the previous Slashdot articles
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/11/12 16245
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/20/13 42211
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/02/15 15252

      -- phone companies have been giving over records and access to logs to the NSA, if not access stream of converstion itself, and acc. to the agencies, they routinely SHARE all secret intelligence information that they can with each other-- FBI, DEA, etc. It doesn't really matter WHAT the first agency used as a justification once info is SHARED with another agency either.

      Infoport
    5. Re:Cool, but... by cb8100 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure cell providers have some kind of "SendMessage(msg, *@provider.net)" functionality.

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    6. Re:Cool, but... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      They already know your number. They've been listening to your phone calls for the last five years :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    7. Re:Cool, but... by llefler · · Score: 1

      That really wouldn't work, alerts would need to be regional. EBS can be triggered by county. What you can expect is some type of broadcast message sent to specific cell towers. Makes you wonder how they're going to support any kind of opt-out, doesn't it? Of course, with the GPS chips that are required to be in your phone now (to 'support 911'), I suppose they could keep track of where all their subscribers are and send individual messages.

      I wonder if this means we'll be getting monthly test message to verify the system is working like they do with the sirens?

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  12. "Test Alerts" My Ass by Chagatai · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The real reason for these alerts is to keep people as scared as possible. A building blew up in New York two days ago? Must be scary terrorists. Your flight was delayed? Be scared--it may be terrorists. Flat Coca-Cola, small puppies getting kicked, and cable rates being raised? Be terrified, because these were likely caused by terrorists.

    The truth is that these events will continue during the 2006 elections and we should start seeing a few Orange Alerts or even a planned attack here in the next several months. No, wait, I got it. There will be an attack immediately followed by news of Osama bin Laden's death. Yeah, that will do it.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by andrewman327 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are already emergency alert systems, and the government has not abused them. The new SECDHS does a good job of not elevating alerts when not needed.


      And to be fair, the federal government was very quick to say that the NYC building explosion the other day was not terrorism.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    2. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You come off as the one who is scared

    3. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your train blew up? Be scared--it may be terrorists.

      Was that a planed attack to?

    4. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Wait a second, do you know where you are? This is /., my friend, not some place to go wildly publishing your calm, rational ravings!

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    5. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      He's already dead. Didn't you get the memo? I heard they got a big-wig in Hollywood (Bollywood?) to shoot the scene and toss in some nice special effects. I hear that the moaning and gurgling soundtrack is awesome. They're saving this for the week before the elections.

      Seriously though, we all know that they time the release of certain material or their actions to be in their best favor. They don't announce good news on a Friday. They'll sit on it until Monday when they can reach a broader audience of voters and campaign contributors. It's not a big stretch to envision them doing something similar with the death of an adversary.

      I would love to a person run for office out of their own pocket, not taking any $$ for any groups or companies or even indiviudals. I'd like to see that person run Whitehouse like a freaking machine. Stop playing political games. Do you damned job. Do the job and get the hell out. Let their performance speak for itself. That would be nice. Of course it would never happen either.

    6. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Terrorists? Nah! As any Quebecois knows, c'est la faute du federal.

    7. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by andrewman327 · · Score: 1
      "Wait a second, do you know where you are? This is /., my friend, not some place to go wildly publishing your calm, rational ravings!"


      How could I have been so blind? Now I'm going to get modded down "-1 rational!"

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    8. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by geobeck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There will be an attack immediately followed by news of Osama bin Laden's death.

      They can't kill off Osama! He's the goose that lays the exploding eggs! After all, 'terror' is just an abstract concept. But when you have such a charismatic poster child, it becomes a war on "that guy with the turban".

      And that creates even more terror, as the resulting xenophobia makes people see 'terrorists' around every corner. Your cab driver? He wears a turban just like Osama! He must be a terrorist! (Actually, the stereotypical Sikh cab driver's turban looks nothing like Osama's, but who pays attention when they're whipped into a xenophobic frenzy?) That engineer at X-TechCo looks kind of like Osama--he must be stealing technical secrets for terrorists! And that airline pilot doesn't look 'American'--ohnoes, we're all going to die!

      Without Osama's pretty face in the news every day, the war on terror would fizzle into a war on apathy.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    9. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Whenever someone writes 'the truth is' without providing evidence to back up his claim or theory, I have a hard time believing it.

      The Emergency Broadcast System which interrupts television and radio is much older than the Bush Administration.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Broadcast_S ystem
      From the article, it sounds like this is an expansion of the EBS (now EAS) to give focused, targeted information to appropriate parties. Your claim that it is a propaganda tool to scare citizens and/or influence elections fails to take into the account the age of the system.

      If your point was so, then there must have been an increase in the number of activations of the Federal EAS (the state, local and feds all have access to issue EAS alerts. So a storm in Massachusetts can be alerted to Massachusetts area residents only) during this administration. I seriously doubt you'd find that, though. In fact, on 9/11, the EAS wasn't even used. (Mostly because the antennae to broadcast the information and the command center were destroyed because they were in the WTC). If your claim is that this is a propaganda tool, you'd probably be surprised to see that it was not used for any of the instances you mention: Not for the gas explosion in NYC, not for delayed flights or kicked puppies. So you claim it will be used for propaganda but there is no past issue of the EAS being used as such by this or any administration.

      This system is most likely there to provide timely targeted information to help citizens and emergency personnel respond to crisis situations effectively. Why would something that is effectively a tool of the good be claimed to be evil, especially with no evidence to that point?

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    10. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Just which section of DHS do you work in???? BTW, the reason everything is suspect today about the federal government under the present Bush Administration - is because so far they've lied about everything. Otherwise, the majority would take it at face value....

    11. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0

      Ok so tell me how this got modded "Insightful"? Were is the insight?

      --
      Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
    12. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Political campaigns these days run into hundreds of millions or even into the billions. Perhaps Warren Buffet has that much money to throw away but I don't think he'd want to be trashtalked.

    13. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

      I would love to a person run for office out of their own pocket, not taking any $$ for any groups or companies or even indiviudals.

      Guys like F. Ross Perot and (maybe) Steve Forbes tried and failed.

      Such is the power of bipartisan American Government.... :P

      Slashdot CAPTCHA: thefts....Coincidence?

    14. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. Sucks. I wish there was a way around it. I wonder what other countries do...

    15. Re:"Test Alerts" My Ass by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      Hmm... exactly the kind of stuff I would want to get on my cellular/pager:

      ATTENTION CITIZENS! You are now under martial law. Able-bodied male and female citizens
      above the age of 16 and below 65 are required to report to a United States Post Office
      for Emergency labor registration and micro-chipping. A curfew has been imposed between
      the hours of 11:00 pm and 07:00 am. This curfew will be enforced on sight with immediate
      lethal force. You are invited to view a public execution that has been scheduled for your
      area. For details visit our website http://executions.gov.nwo./ You are required to report
      to a hospital for mandatory innoculations. Public Water is safe for human consumption:
      We are pleased to announce that we have substantially increased the levels of Fluoride
      in public water to provide additional protection for your teeth. United States Police
      Units are now searching your neighborhood for illegal weapons. Please keep your front
      door unlocked in order to avoid unnecessary use of force. The troopers will announce themselves
      as United States Police. It is strongly recommended that upon hearing this you _immediately_
      lie down flat on your stomach and clasp your hands behind your back. United We Stand.

  13. SMS charges? by yellowbkpk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So does this mean that when I get an SMS pushed to me by the DHS via my cell carrier that I'll get charged $0.10 for the feature, or will it be a free-of-charge alert?

    1. Re:SMS charges? by oliana · · Score: 1

      Not for the text message, but a monthly fee for the priviledge of being able to get them call the "RERVUF Fund" (Re-Elect Repubs via use of fear Fund)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
    2. Re:SMS charges? by orielbean · · Score: 1

      But remember DHS is paid from your taxes. So you paid for the message one way or the other. Maybe even twice!

    3. Re:SMS charges? by Stompp · · Score: 1

      Somehow I get the feeling that not only will we foot the bill for DHS via taxes, but we'll get charged once by our carriers, and those carriers will also most likely find some way to bill the government for the "critical" service they are providing. Even (hypothetical) kickbacks to the carriers in the form of tax breaks, we still foot the bill 1, 2 possibly 3 times.

      --
      Remember, adding a random "do:loop" into someone else's code is a damn good time!
  14. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this is supposed to be a war on terror, then why is it that all they seem to be doing is looking for new ways to make people terrified?

    1. Re:I don't get it by swtaarrs · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because people are easy to manipulate when they're afraid. 9/11, as terrible as it was, was the best thing to happen to Bush's presidency. It gave him the ability to justify any of his actions with "it's for the war on terror" and most people are afraid enough to take it. Hopefully he won't cause too much more damage before he's done in 08...

    2. Re:I don't get it by koreth · · Score: 1

      It depends on what the meaning of the word "on" is. When you see "war on terror" it's like "he's on drugs" or "girl on girl."

  15. Strategic terror alerts by Nijika · · Score: 1

    As others stated it should indeed be opt-in. Although if it's "global", that being everyone in the US, or specific states could be alerted all at once, it'd be mighty convenient to issue terror alerts to blue states (or red states, depending on who's in power) right as people are going to the polls. "Stay away! Terror! Don't vote!"

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  16. what?! by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    That's never happened before, why would they start doing it now?

    I mean, it's not like the terror alerts shifted up and down during the run-up to the 2004 elections.

    Oh, wait.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:what?! by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hopefully it will be an extension of the current Emergency Broadcast System - you know, the one that makes annoying noises on your TV you get your attention. I've only ever seen that used for occasional tests, and for weather storm warnings. EBS doesn't seem politicized to me. In fact, I think having an established way to notify "everybody" of something is a very reasonable idea. (Though I doubt it will be useful for terrorism, which typically strikes with even less warning than an ICBM.)

    2. Re:what?! by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Here you are mistaken.

      Go and ask your grandpa.

      This is a repeat of what was going on in the UK, US and USSRin the late 40-es and early 50-es when they had the idea that they fight a nuclear war and win it. There were casual tests of mass broadcast systems, nuclear fallout shelters being built, contingency procedures put in place, etc.

      This illusion soon faded as it became clear that there will be no winners and no losers if a nuclear conflict really breaks out. So the silly exercises stopped. First in the US and UK. USSR stopped a bit later around Hrushev's time.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:what?! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      This is a repeat of what was going on in the UK

      A yellow-coded curfew is now in effect. Any unauthorized persons will be subject to arrest. This is for your protection.

    4. Re:what?! by arivanov · · Score: 1
      You must carry your identity card at all times and show to all policemen when requested.

      What goes around comes around. And in the words of Propellerheads as sung with Shirley Bassey:
      The newspapers shout a new style is growing,
      but it don't know if it's coming or going,
      there is fashion, there is fad
      some is good, some is bad
      and the joke is rather sad,
      that its all just a little bit of history repeating
      .. just little bits of history repeating
      .. and I've seen it before
      .. and I'll see it again
      .. yes I've seen it before
      .. just little bits of history repeating

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  17. FLASH! by bk4u · · Score: 2, Funny

    So when you get a text, remember to duck and cover. Hiding under desks also helps.

    --
    Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
  18. That could be annoying.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    A disaster happens (I wonder if they would have used such a thing during 9|11 even to tell people who were not directly at risk?), and I find my pda beeping, cell phone vibrating, TV sirening, computer flashing, and maybe even my fax maching faxing. And to anyone who dares make fun of me having all these devices active at once, I'd imagine quite a few people here would too....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  19. In case of apathy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Break all electronic devices nearbly, lest you be innunadated with hyped-up warnings. Hell, I don't even pay attention to tornado sirens--at least, I don't due so in the usual sense--my incessent curiousity as to how turbulent the weather is causes me to 'hang out' and watch the storm outside until it subsides. So, now people might rush out to possible terrorism targets and 'wait' for something novel to occur? Hmm...

  20. Who are the terrorists? by McGiraf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The terrorists' goal is to spread fear to help them get to their political goals. They are going to be very happy everytime this alert system is used, they're going to reach a lot more people to scare them now. And with this no need to plan expensive real terrorist acts, you just have to convince the USA intelligences services that something big is going to happen. But who is spreading the most fear? Who's political agenda is pushed by this? Who are the terrorists?

    1. Re:Who are the terrorists? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      Something big and credible like trying to flood lower Manhatten that is 10 feet above sea level.

    2. Re:Who are the terrorists? by geobeck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The terrorists' goal is to spread fear to help them get to their political goals. They are going to be very happy everytime this alert system is used...

      And that's exactly why they are going to use it.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    3. Re:Who are the terrorists? by Target+Practice · · Score: 1

      "They are going to be very happy everytime this alert system is used, they're going to reach a lot more people to scare them now."

      Well put. Is this the same country we were almost a century ago? While it's spoken against a backdrop of the Great Depression, it fits today:

      "...let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself--nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."

      While that's often quoted, what about the following sentence in the same address?

      "In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory."
      (from FDR's first inaugural address)

      I am beginning to think this is one dark hour of our national life where our leadership is failing to learn that principle, or have learned the opposite too well...

      --
      There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    4. Re:Who are the terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terrorists' goal is to spread fear to help them get to their political goals. They are going to be very happy everytime this alert system is used...


      And that's exactly why they are going to use it.


      Actually, that sounds an awful lot like Fascism, to me.

      Why would the DHS want to help terrorists?

    5. Re:Who are the terrorists? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      And with this no need to plan expensive real terrorist acts, you just have to convince the USA intelligences services that something big is going to happen.
      not really, if a while passes with lots of alerts and no actual terrorism people will just start ignoring the alerts. Keeping the public terrified long term is going to require actual attacks.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  21. great, more spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    just what I need, more spam.
    can i opt-out??

  22. You have 1 unread message by Tyrsenus · · Score: 1

    From:DHS
    To:555-564-5930
    Txt msg body:

    There's nothing to see here. Please move along.

    End msg body.

  23. Eurasia Armies Have Broken Through Enemy Lines! by Pizaz · · Score: 2

    We have always been at war with Eurasia.

    1. Re:Eurasia Armies Have Broken Through Enemy Lines! by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Nobody reads George Orwell anymore. Documentaries are boring, you see.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  24. Wooo... by Attis_The_Bunneh · · Score: 1

    Alert The Internets!

    -- Bridget

  25. DHS reserves right to INTERRUPT speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And corrupt the first amendment.

    What will happen is they will interrupt your show with some irrelevent crap exactly when you are telling the public that there is electronic election fraud.

    ask the DHS what exactly is the status of the security of our country.

    Fuck the DHS

    ~phil

    1. Re:DHS reserves right to INTERRUPT speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good input. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.

      You dip shit.

  26. the sky is falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning Warning Warning!
    Fear Alert -- You should be scared now!
    Please run and hide.
    All is not how it should be.

    I am the Great Oz!

  27. Whatever happened to. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that wonderful color-coded scale that was touted to alert people to the current state of readiness? You do remember that chart, don't you?

    Me neither.

    So tell me again how sending the entire nation into a tizzy everytime bin Laden sneezes is going to be any better? Don't we have enough dumbasses living in a swamp coming on tv and telling everyone how afraid they are that their double-wide will be bombed whenever they see someone whose skin isn't white?

    Do we really need this crap other than to keep people in a state of panic?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Whatever happened to. . . by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I have a cheap phone with a monochrome screen. I'm in a constant state of outright terror.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    2. Re:Whatever happened to. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So tell me again how sending the entire nation into a tizzy everytime bin Laden sneezes is going to be any better?

      By making sure that everyone is constantly afraid, the politicians/powers that be can continually grab more power - "Hey, we're keeping the Muslims from killing all of you! You NEED to keep us in power! Want proof?!? Why, there hasn't been a terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11! Yes siree! It's obvious proof that OUR policies are working!"

      And you know what? The American folks who seem to have ALL of the political power these days (AM Radio Listening Christian Fundalmentalist Kooks) buy into this horseshit Hook line and sinker! AND, if you throw in that you're against Gay marriage, abortion, and buring the flag..you are home free and keeping your really cushy $150,000+ job (House) or $200,000+ (Senate) or $400,000 + the millions when you leave office (Executive)!

    3. Re:Whatever happened to. . . by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      Do we really need this crap other than to keep people in a state of panic?

      Well, it does keep LEtterman and Leno in material...

      Seriously, I think it's safe to say there's only one terror level, and it hasn't changed, ever. Before 9/11, the Twin Towers were bombed in '93, Tim McVeigh took out the Murrah Federal Building in OK City in '95, and there was of course the Unabomber. Just look at events like the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, the Iranian Hostage crisis, the Munich Olympics massacre, Pearl Harbor -- the list goes on and on.

      The fact is that violence against, toward, and within this country is nothing new. We don't need some color-coded system invented by a Sesame Street writer cast-off to tell us how safe we feel; on the other hand, we as a nation do need to start taking things more seriously as far as our personal safety is concerned. I'd rather call in a suspicious package to some hotline and get some idiot's briefcase blown into tiny bits that miss a bomb or anything else. We have to be more vigilant and we have to find a way to do it that doesn't make us look ridiculous but that everyone can take seriously.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  28. They should just issue everyone a TV by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    In order to not miss any alerts, you could just leave it on all the time (hey, the government's paying for it, right?). The government could broadcast alerts or educational content (maybe some exercise shows?) and of course programs with patriotic themes. They could even make it interactive! Of course, there might be problems getting enough people to be "interactivity monitors", but I bet if they tried they could do it!

    "Tonight on Airstrip One Reports...."

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
    1. Re:They should just issue everyone a TV by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      And, of course, it'll be illegal to turn it off.

    2. Re:They should just issue everyone a TV by geobeck · · Score: 1

      The government could broadcast alerts or educational content (maybe some exercise shows?)...

      That's all we need: "Come on! Work those buns! And a-one, and a-two, and a terror level orange! Six more... four more... okay everybody: duck and cover! And a-duck! And a-cover! And a..."

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  29. Can't wait... by ph43thon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...until some guy hacks that system to send out "Test Alerts" about his large penis.

    1. Re:Can't wait... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      These terrorists wouldn't be attacking us if we all had larger penises. It's your patriotic duty to buy this pill...

    2. Re:Can't wait... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      This has been a test of the emergency alert system. The broadcasters in your area, in voluntary cooperation with FCC, state, and local authorities, have developed this system to keep you informed of Bob's gigantic penis. Had this been an actual emergency, the attention signal you just heard would be followed by official measurements, photos, and directions for available women.

      This concludes this test of the emergency alert system.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  30. Great. more wasted $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in the cold war they started the EBS, "Emergency Broadcast System", so if the Russians fired their nukes, you'd have a good half hour to "duck and cover" and tremble in fear before you were vaporized in an atomic holocaust.

    This was more intelligently re-worked as the "EAS", or Emergency Alert System, where they actually had a real use for it: it would sound when a tornado or other dangerous weather was coming. Anyone remember the hilarious episode of WKRP where there was a tornado about to hit Cincinnatti, and the radio station only had warnings for nukes, and Les Nessman had to substutite "tornado" for "communist" (warning of the "Godless Tornados")?

    WTF is this damned pork? There is already as system in place. The EAS could warn you of a terror attack just as easily as a tornado... except they can't see terrorists on radar, or 9-11 wouldn't have happened! WTF is this actually supposed to DO? I mean, besides coddle the cowardly?

    Speaking of weather vs Osama, we had two tornados rip through our town this year, no loss of human life (lots of dead animals) but incredible infrastructure destruction- houses, trailers, businesses, roofs, electricity, roads. Bin Laden couldn't DREAM of making a mess anywhere near as catastrophic. I can't imagine anyone here (or moreso New Orleans where a thousand people died) being the least bit scared of terrorists.

    Is anybody else sick of our incredibly cowardly government? What can we do to get these yellow bellied chickenshits to grow a spine?

    1. Re:Great. more wasted $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speaking of weather vs Osama, we had two tornados rip through our town this year, no loss of human life (lots of dead animals) but incredible infrastructure destruction- houses, trailers, businesses, roofs, electricity, roads. Bin Laden couldn't DREAM of making a mess anywhere near as catastrophic.

      Well said sir!

      I once did a speech about death rates in America and the top 10 according to the CDC. When I said that 9/11 could happen EVERY year and NOT MAKE THE TOP TEN, some folks were in credulous about that - that's how stupid Americans are!

    2. Re:Great. more wasted $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is this damned pork? There is already as system in place. The EAS could warn you of a terror attack just as easily as a tornado... except they can't see terrorists on radar, or 9-11 wouldn't have happened! WTF is this actually supposed to DO? I mean, besides coddle the cowardly?

      Except the Emergency Alerty System has the same limitations that this new system is trying to overcome. Not everybody has a TV or radio on 24/7, and such situations are becoming even less common with new media. So the EAS will become less effective over time. What's bad about creating an updated EAS that can alert people in a medium that they're more likely to have with them at the time?

    3. Re:Great. more wasted $$$ by em+guy · · Score: 1

      As an emergency management professional I assure you that we FANTASIZE about having a way to rapidly notify our citizens of emergencies that could affect them. Yes, the Emergency Alert System is a great tool, in fact, every time I give a presentation on disaster preparedness I urge people to get an EAS receiver, but I would estimate that less than 3% of the households in our community own one and, of those, less than 25% are in use and have a backup battery installed. While the capability to send a message to text-capable devices probably isn't THE solution it would be another tool in the toolbox and potentially a very useful one. If you aren't going to take some personal responsibility and put together a disaster kit and buy an EAS reciever then at least let us TRY to help you. When a train derails in your community sending a cloud of toxic vapor into nearby neighborhoods (as hapened here a few years ago) I hope you have the capability to notify your citizens before its too late.

  31. Keeping Americans scared... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Department of Homeland Security... keeping Americans scared for a double plus good future.

  32. *text msg chime* by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    FROM: DHS
    SUBJECT: omgwtfbbq
    BODY: big missls cmg oshit run awy now pls kthx

    1. Re:*text msg chime* by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Dude. You owe me a keyboard! That was the funniest damned thing I've read all day.

  33. Another option by imarsman · · Score: 1

    They're also working on a way to put a fear-inducing drug in beer and getting Max von Sydow to distribute it at Octoberfest.

    1. Re:Another option by geobeck · · Score: 1

      Beer already contains a fear-inducing drug. It's called alcohol. A big, drunken crowd is an easy place to start a panic. Just imagine if someone were to hack into the system and send a "TIDAL WAVE!!" SMS during N'Awlins Mardi Gras.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  34. What they don't tell you is.. by bigtimepie · · Score: 1

    What they don't tell you is that all your outgoing data will be inversely read and/or filtered for "security reasons."

  35. I always hated this by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    "This has been a test of the emergency broadcast system" - CBC.
    When in fact it was just a test of my patience. Can we please limit this to commercial time?

    Oh I guess it wouldn't be very effective unless it was able to intterupt everyone in what they were doing. Welcome to the new and improved "in your face" politics. Next they will be legislating mandatory PVR passthrough, telephone interrupt, and server pushed popups, just to make they have our attention for the weekly test.

    Ok, it probably wont be that bad. It might even be a good thing when we really need it. But I am skeptical.It just seems like it has a huge potential to waste a truck load of time over the years.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  36. this of this as an upgrade by beta-guy · · Score: 1

    this is mearly the color coded system 2.0 now when it goes to orange everyone will know :P

  37. Government sponsered SPAM. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Just a thought.

  38. Indeed by temojen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've long wondered how many amber alerts are not for missing children. Train everyone to go "omg think of the children", and you can use it to find political dissidents at the drop of a hat.

    It reminds me of a scene, I think from 1984, "Attention all citizens, there is a criminal running through the streets..."

    Maybe this has happened; maybe it will happen; maybe it's just the muscle relaxants talking.

    1. Re:Indeed by The_Unforgiven · · Score: 3, Informative

      I could be wrong, but I think you're probably thinking of Fahrenheit 451, rather than 1984.

      Not trying to be picky or anything, just figured I mention it.

      --
      http://wsulug.org
    2. Re:Indeed by kimvette · · Score: 1

      And, when they could not find the "criminal" they picked off some random joe for the newscast, because, you know, the government can't make a mistake.

      Both Farenheit 451 and 1984 are great books and should be required reading for everyone. If everyone were to read those I bet more people would get out to vote, and would vote based on issues and constitutional concerns rather than "gee, that candidate is cute and reminds me of JFK"

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Indeed by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      "gee, that candidate is cute and reminds me of JFK"
      Yes, but did you have to elect a president that reminds people of JFK at 12:31pm on November 22, 1963?

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    4. Re:Indeed by hazem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While many of us see Fahrenheit 451, 1984, and Animal Farm as warnings of what could be. The real problem comes from the people in power (or want to be in power) who see these books as instruction manuals.

    5. Re:Indeed by kimvette · · Score: 1

      No, really, the real problem is that here in America we have the power to overturn the government through multiple means, be it the vote or through the second amendment. People don't bother to vote, and one of many negative results of that is that we are becoming less and less able to execute our second amendment responsibilities because those rights are being curbed, so by the time we lose the power to vote or our vote ceases to be binding, we will be unable to eradicate the tyranny.

      Get out and vote, and vote wisely, else we lose all accountability of the governmnent to the people.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  39. Bass Ackwards by 955301 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    This is exactly the type of information broadcasting was intended for now we're going to try to distribute it on systems that are intended to reach single devices? WTF?!

    They would be better off requiring all computers and phones to have a built in emergency broadcast radio receiver permanently fixed on the channel and on at all times. At least then they won't bog down general bandwidth.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  40. Use Firefox Homeland Insecurity Idiocy Level! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I need - it says "Scared" on my browser now in a yellow box.

    When it changes for the worse I'll pop a beer and kiss my butt goodbye.

    Homeland Security Office - that's a contradiction in the USA

  41. False alarm by freaktheclown · · Score: 1

    What happens when there's a false alarm?

    1. Re:False alarm by geobeck · · Score: 1

      From: DHS
      Subject: Nuclear missiles inbound
      Tx body:

      Oops, my bad

      End Tx body

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  42. Um Europe by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading somewere about a system like this in Europe. One of the features was you would get a txt message welcomeing you when you entered another country.

    1. Re:Um Europe by Enigmafan · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, this system is awful. Whenever you're in a train crossing a border, or arriving at an airport, 500 phones simmultaneously go beep beep... beep beep to alert them that they... well... Crossed a border, I guess...

      Oh I remember now, it is to alert you that you're in a different country and calling on your mobile is gonna cost a small fortune.

    2. Re:Um Europe by heson · · Score: 1

      No, thats a diffrent system. The operator sends some spams when your phone roams into its network for the first time, very annoying.

  43. WRONG - they have been abused. by JetScootr · · Score: 3, Informative

    When Hurricane FEMA^H^H^H^HRita was due to hit the Texas coast, I received 3-4 phone calls in a 15-minute span telling me to leave. Forced evacuations mean the gov't won't allow individuals to plan for themselves. I've lived within 15 miles of the Gulf since 1967, and have never needed to leave for any hurricane. I could tell that Rita was going to weaken, from experience. Hurricanes that start up quickly in the Gulf also weaken quickly as they approach Houston.
    I spent 5 days on the road for no good f******* reason.
    That's abuse of power.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    1. Re:WRONG - they have been abused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so when the storm doesn't weaken one day, and you didn't leave... I'm not going to run around in a boat and pick your stupid ass up.

    2. Re:WRONG - they have been abused. by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      This is not really an abuse of the alert system, per se. The decision was made to force an evacuation, and that decision was later relayed to you through this system. I understand that 5 days on the road must have royally sucked, but don't blame the messenger.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    3. Re:WRONG - they have been abused. by JetScootr · · Score: 1

      That's my point. You won't have to, cuz I've already been thru a Cat 5 hurricane. With the proper preparation, it's not a problem. Your house must be built right, surrounded by other houses and trees and strong fences. You stock up like the local news folks tell you too - but about triple; and a portable generator.
      During the off season, build 2*4 reinforced, 3/4 inch plywood stormshutters, about 6" bigger than yer windows; so they fit snugly into the window hole in the brickwork...your house is brick, right? The kind without wheels?
      Use 1/4" rebar, drilled thru the brick into the house's supporting studs to form large staple-shaped slots for the 2*4's to slide into. Once you have one for each window, set them aside while you wait for a hurricane. When it comes, securely nail up those suckers, inside the rebar. Use the 4 or 5 inch framer's nails, the kind you could use to crucify the Hulk.
      Oh and one other thing - in the exact center of the plywood, cut a slot about 2 feet long and 4 inches wide. Several reasons: Handy for carrying the shutters; lets the hurricane winds go thru but not the debris; Perfect "see and shoot" slot for *after* the hurricane. The wind's comin thru no matter what you do; don't worry about broken glass - just block the stuff that comes with it. I seriously doubt the "disaster" movies on Discovery channel about how debris goes thru cinder block. The kinetic energy is in the wind, but the momentum is not in most of the debris. In order to get thru the shutter, whatever hits it must: >Be better built than the shutters; >Have no where else to go; >Already being moving at more than 120 mph or so; >be in a high velocity wind that is flowing, not swirling, right near your window. See above about surrounding houses and trees.
      It works; hurricanes can be survived, as long as you don't have FEMA helping you.

      --
      Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    4. Re:WRONG - they have been abused. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      And this will protect you from the storm surge, how?

    5. Re:WRONG - they have been abused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having sat through a big cyclone as a kid I can also say the two key things in my favour were (1) house made out of concrete (how come only the first two little pigs made it to the southern USA?) and (2) house above sea level (bummer if you are in southern USA when the sea levels rise). Those two things don't seem to be too much to ask?

  44. Bigass waste of money by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 1

    Hmm...disaster prepardness...being able to tell people where to evacuate...didnt DHS already get an absolute ton of money to implement all this crap? What did they do with that money?
    Ohhhh that's right, they pissed it away and then we saw them utterly fail against something we KNEW was coming (Katrina).
    And their solution to their shitty management and inability to run anything properly is to...give...them...more...money?
    Yep, they're a government agency allright. Oh, and of course we won't have a choice as to whether to give them more money or that. That's the beauty of it, they pretty much get the money by fiat. Of course, we could vote out all the louts in congress etc who administer this nightmare, but hell...if you think you can actually change anything in the US Government by votes alone, and without massive amounts of cash to bribe politicians with, then I have a bridge in brooklyn you might be interested in

    --
    Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
  45. Urgent Message by 27,000 · · Score: 0
    Sent: Today, 11:28AM
    From: kimjongil@****.nk
    ZERG RUSH KEKEKEKEKE ^___________^

    Urgent Message
    Sent: Today, 11:36AM
    From: gwbush@****.gov
    STFU I SAID NO RUSH
    Uh, that aside... what could they possibly send that would be of use? 'We expect a terror attack in your vicinity, please move in an orderly fashion to the marked panic zones' - the police should present for this. 'America is under attack from terrorist forces, stay calm' - probably not much use to us right now. 'Your downtown district has been closed off due to a severe attack' - if a message could get through after a major event, I'd be impressed. Emergency warnings are good in the event of severe weather, as people living in areas at risk know what tornadoes and hurricanes do, and have prepared. Americans have historically prepared for nuclear attack and air raids, as we know what those do and how to shelter ourselves. Brief emergency warnings simply won't work in the face of a real terrorist attack. We don't know how they'll attack, where, or how we should seek shelter, and brief cellular messages do not seem to be the way to spread that information.
    --
    My problem with spontaneous human combustion is that never seems to happen to the "right" people.
  46. Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine the cacophony of an office or theater full of cell phones, pagers, and other devices when a test is sent through this system?

  47. a good thing, or FEMA's job? by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but this system actually has some appeal to me.

    I wouldn't want to be receiving messages everytime Osama Bin Laden sneezes, or some vague insubstantial threat warning is released, but some type of good, reliable system for distributing information when there is a clear and present danger would be immensely helpful to our country.

    An effective information distribution system would have done wonders for getting people out of New Orleans ahead of time, rather than at the very last minute.

    Likewise, if such a system were activated during the big NYC blackout a few years ago, it would done a lot to let people know that there was no sort of terrorist attack or other emergency.

    As long as such a system is kept under tight control to only be used in *extreme* emergencies, I have no problem with it, although I do agree that such a system could very easily be used for propoganda purposes...

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:a good thing, or FEMA's job? by British · · Score: 1


      Likewise, if such a system were activated during the big NYC blackout a few years ago, it would done a lot to let people know that there was no sort of terrorist attack or other emergency.


      That is, if there was electricity to transmit it with.

    2. Re:a good thing, or FEMA's job? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      most cell networks and radio transmitters were working fine. the cell networks were overloaded to the point of being unusable, but it wouldn't have killed them to temporarily suspend all traffic for an emergency broadcast.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:a good thing, or FEMA's job? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      but it wouldn't have killed them to temporarily suspend all traffic for an emergency broadcast.

      It would, in two ways:
      - Loss of revenue: people are burning through minutes, maybe even encountering overages. If you're the cell provider, are you going to want to stop all those calls?
      - What's to say that the calls weren't emergency calls? Are you going to terminate the call made from an emergency management official to, say, police headquarters, in order to send him a memo saying that the power is out?

      I'm not saying the system is all bad, just that placing a really high priority on sending these memos isn't going to be to everyone's advantage.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    4. Re:a good thing, or FEMA's job? by dangitman · · Score: 1
      but some type of good, reliable system for distributing information when there is a clear and present danger would be immensely helpful to our country.

      But it would just take up too much bandwidth. Every day you would get a message: "Bush remains President," "GOP fascists threaten USA with destruction," "Liberties being curtailed," "Oil Cartel takes over USA," "Dick Cheney goes hunting," etc.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  48. damn my unclear posting by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    I meant the system abused for political means has never happened before, and it was (poor) sarcasm.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  49. opt out? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

    They better have an opt out for this "service" because if i start getting charged for the text messages i receive i will look into starting a class action suit.... for a lot, my time is quite valuable.

    --
    To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  50. Amber Alert by blacknblu · · Score: 1

    Why would DHS need this ability? Is there something wrong with the media alerts currently used? I would imagine that since this is a government agency, the bureaucracy involved to send an alert would pale in comparison to other news sources. If anything, this would be a glorified Amber Alert

    --
    "Does this wine taste funny to you?" -- Socrates
  51. Ugh by Cryssen · · Score: 1

    So I'd get a bill from Cingular for said text message...I already get enough unsolicited text messages that cost me money.

    --
    "Frisbeetarianism is the belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the roof and gets stuck." -George Carlin
  52. Government Spam by darcling · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I have SMS messages blocked on my cell, that way I don't have to hear about it every time the security level changes from yellow to orange to periwinkle. (unless the evil overlords have already planned for this and override it somehow : / ) -d

    --
    noobcake or noobmuffin? It is the same price...
  53. Text message warning in stages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Some glitches remain as telephone companies and other networks grapple with potentially trying to
    > alert all of their customers at the same time without jamming their systems, Lawson said.

    That's easy enough to figure out. Send out the text messages in waves, from least annoying customers to the most.

    "I'm sorry to hear about your injury Mister Donovan. Yes, it did take ten minutes for you to get the message, that is because you are a "Tier five" customer. Yes, yes, it seems that Ted in activations flagged your account as a five after you ridiculed his manhood."

  54. By region by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm imagining that it's more like a "send to any phone listening in this region" kind of deal. They don't care what phone numebr you have, as long as it is communicating in a tower in a region they'd like to send a message to.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  55. Ommission by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    ""The Department of Homeland Security is gearing up to be able to periodic test 'alerts' to cable television stations, satellite radio, as well as any text-capable device -- PDAs, cell phones, and web sites."

    You forgot to add the next lines - "Expect the alerts to slowly start a few days after disaster strikes. (When it is so obvious to the rest of the country something needs to be done.) Immediately following, you will receive texts placing the blame squarely on mayors, governors, and other local authorities."

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  56. What is the point? The media will alert more... by ac7xc · · Score: 1

    Any time there is any emergency the local and national media are all over the story before the government even know what the hell is going on. Another stupid government program.

  57. How is this about fear? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    DHS is about protection and security. That includes a lot more than just terrorism, this would be awesome for alerts about regional problems where you'd like to alert a lot of people at once about a problem - like reverse 911 only to communication devices that people actually use today. Shouldn't we be happy that something actually useful and of value might come out of DHS instead of meaningless color coded alerts that everyone ignores?

    Are you also claiming reverse 911 is just a tool to scare us all?

    To paraphrase Freud, sometiems a communication tool is just a communication tool.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How is this about fear? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Funny

      reverse 911

      That would be totally freaky. Skyscrapes being built all by themselves, followed by people madly jumping hundreds of feet off the ground in order to get to work. I'd run the fuck away from anything that scary.

    2. Re:How is this about fear? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1
      DHS is about protection and security.

      No, DHS is about making "white people feel safe."
    3. Re:How is this about fear? by TempeTerra · · Score: 1
      reverse 911


      Gary: Nine-eleven in reverse... Jesus, that's...
      Spottswoode: Yes. One hundred and nineteen.

      (apologies to the gp, I realise this joke is based on misinterpretation of your post)
      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
  58. already exists .... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    at least for cable systems - SCTE18 is the standard you want

  59. Laugh all you want by temojen · · Score: 1

    I'm still going to teach my kids to duck and cover.

    Sure the bert the turtle cartoon was over-simplified, but it was directed at 6-7 year old children.

    It's not just aplicable to nuclear incidents.

    Near-by transformer shorts out? There's a big flash. The split second it takes to duck and cover may save a child from being hit by debris Near-by lighning strike? Ducking may reduce the chance of the child being struck (more applicable on the prairies than where I live) SWAT team raiding the crack-house up the street? Taking cover when you see the flash-bang may keep a kid from being hit by a stray bullet. Industrial accident nearby? There may be secondary explosions or flying debris; best to take cover An actual nuclear detonation? If you're still able to duck and cover after seeing the flash, you might be far enough away to survive the blast if you take cover.

  60. what about Electromagnetic bombs? by v3xt0r · · Score: 1

    How do you alert people when an E-bomb has leveled all electronic devices in that (rather large) area?

    I guess it won't matter at that point, as you'll have less than an hour to find a fallout shelter. =(

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  61. When there is a disaster rely only on yourself by Zed2K · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Don't rely on the gov't to come bailing you out. They have more important things to worry about. If there is a disaster in your area you better be prepared to fend for yourself for as long as it takes to get services back up and running.

    Oh and if you get flooded out and move to another state to suck off the FEMA free money gravy train, when the train stops, and you haven't gotten off your ass to get a job, don't go crying to the press that you need more time and can't find work.

  62. NOAA Weather Radio All Hazards by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like NOAA Weather Radio All Hazards Established infrastructure, works, and isn't that expensive for the end user. But that is the rub -- people have to buy a compatible radio. If there were any kind of demand, that could be cheaply added to clock radios, TVs, etc.

  63. Just in time for 2006 elections! by Weirsbaski · · Score: 1

    Will the system be used the same way the color-coded terror-level was used? Put out continuous "terror-warnings" just before the 2006 elections, maybe ending with a "your safety depends on a tough-on-terrorist administration" signature? I'm not saying the system is necessarily politically-motivated, it just seems like election-time sharpens the administration's focus on terrorism.

    --

    I am not a sig.
  64. Wouldn't have worked for 9/11 by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1

    ...since the destruction of the World Trade Center towers took out several cell networks based within the buildings.

    If this warn-every-device system is created and manages to avoid loss of life or destruction of property, then it might just get targeted first next time. But I'm not optimistic that it will be that successful.

    --
    In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
  65. Department of Homeland Spam by lamebrane · · Score: 1

    Just another way to get the 50M who purportedly voted for bush all twitted up, again.

    Here in DC, we had several 'informational' electronic signs placed above major thoroughfares such as the Beltway. For a couple of years after 9/11, these reminded us to "REPORT SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR - PHONE 1-800-DHS-WATCH" (or somesuch). Whenever I passed, I would make my little car swerve a bit left and right and wave my hand in the air, inviting those steadfast AMERICANS to report me. Haven't had a knock on the door, yet.

    Red, Orange, Yellow, Green. Emergency Broadcast System. Children, the drill is to get your head under the desk and wait for the ball-o-fire. Same bullshit, same purveyors. Only reason is to get more money out of your pocket and into theirs!

  66. Gvmt. Warning: Erection May Collapse... by goat_roperdillo · · Score: 1

    Luckily you can buy Viagra today at
    Uphold!

  67. That's why you use ham radio! by flynns · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bah. Nobody in emergency comms relies on cell phones anyway.

    Except the Red Cross. But that's another story.
     
    /Emergency Coordinatory, Amateur Radio Emergency Service, Okaloosa County, FL
    //73 from KI4IIB

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  68. Why is this modded up to 4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the Kos kids taking over slashdot?

  69. Err... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to tell the DHS that telephone companies NEVER have enough equipment to handle all of the subscribers at once, because they bank on the fact that not everyone uses the phone at the same time!

  70. This is Only a Test by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    This is all just more simcurity bullshit. On 9/11/2001, the US was under direct major attack in NYC and DC. For hours no one knew whether there would be more attacks, whether escalated with nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, missiles, or anything.

    The Emergency Broadcast System, which generations of Americans have been drilled in for precisely that scenario, was silent.

    And no one even noticed it was missing. The first notice I heard of it was last year, when some obscure TV comedian's standup routine mentioned it.

    The current Homeland Security system is so much more a charade than our Cold War systems that we can expect nothing but failures from it.

    And every proven failure destroys America's ability to protect and govern ourself, as we learn to distrust the government to do anything, even though it used to at least do so adequately.

    I fully expect widespread DHS alerts during the Republican campaign season now underway, that stretches through November 2006, past 2008, and whenever it's necessary to scare Americans out of the wits we might use to change the course we're on.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  71. Re:Why is this modded up to 4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You made my day. The kos kids took over here long ago.

  72. Test Message #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, err. Vote Quimby!

  73. it's too bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you wouldn't have any idea if the message in the alerts was total bullshit or not. This government has proven beyond any doubt they wil lie on top of lie to push some NWO globalism fascist agenda. It's a good idea, but as far as I am concerned, RR had it correct, there isn't any trust without verification, and now they are making even verification "illegal", they are going to "crack down" on "leakers", the people who still have a conscious in government and are willing to try and get the truth out.

    The coup plotters have taken over, they control the DHS, so anything they say in these "alerts" is unfortunately suspect now. My advice to folks is to always keep open alternative channels of information, even if it is as old fashioned as just knowing how to use a shortwave receiver adequately. You could *easily* be fed some complete fairy tale like the 9-11 crap again and they would use that fairy tale to institute more draconian take over measures.

    These are *dangerous times* now, I mean real dangerous, there are crazy deranged people in charge and issuing orders that are being followed by mostly well meaning but hoplessly naieve people, a lot of them with guns and in positions of authority.. we have plots within conspiracies and it is about impossible now to get any real unbiased data to form opinions. My default stance is if it comes from an official federal mouthpiece, it's a lie, or has a high probability of being a lie or "half lie".

  74. Phone? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    reverse 911

    That would be totally freaky. Skyscrapes being built all by themselves,


    I think you may want to re-read my comment, and notice that no-where did I use a slash between "9" and "11". Instead I am referring to the number you dial when you need an ambulance... authorities can use the 911 system in reverse to dial everyone in a certain area to warn them if they need to evacuate, as in the case of flood or hurricane or forest fire.

    My apologies if you were just trying to make a joke and actually knew what reverse-911 was... it just seems too many people have 9/11 on the brains and are not thinking of other kinds of emergencies that can occur.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Phone? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      I was trying to make a joke but hadn't heard of reverse 911. That just seems like a poor way to go about doing things. I'm sure if I asked a number of people in my town (New York City), they wouldn't have the foggiest idea such a program even existed. If it rang at 4 in the morning, I'd definitely dismiss it as a prank.

      As much as I hate the police helicopters patrolling at dawn for "more tur'ists", this is exactly the sort of thing "shock and awe" is good at motivating (assuming they use bullhorns).

  75. here here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't forget, Mumbai has also been the target of even worse terrorist attacks in the past, and unlike the Americans, the people of India went right back to their lives without starting wars against countries not involved in the bombings and without creating huge new government burocracies and endless scare tactics designed primarily to win votes.


    Basically the people of India have FAR more of a spine than the snivelling cowards that seem to make up the majority of the US population. It's no wonder many Americans look down on the french, the two countries are extremely similar to each other, only a couple of hundred years apart in their influence and power.

  76. Hmmmmm by skelator2821 · · Score: 1

    So when the elections come up for Senate and congress they can RAPID-FIRE off dozens of so Called "TERROR ALERTS" and people will be scared into voting the Republicans into office to "Protect us all" Pretty Sad But for "NATURAL" Disaster warnings it would be a Great Idea

  77. FEMA? by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    From TFA...

    "The Homeland Security Department, through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, expects to have the system working by the end of next year..."

    Sure they will... as long as the FEMA director isn't out having dinner at the time.

    Keep the peace(es).

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  78. This IS NEEDED! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    This is very much needed as an update to emergency notification systems. The current state of emergency notification in general is horrible. I've sat thru severe storms with the "air raid" sirens going and not been able to quickly get info about what was going on... with internet, cell phones, TV (OTA and cable/dish) and radio all going at the same time!!! It's seriously time to take the new tech into account. After all, if your listing to you ipod while streaming video from the web like most slashdotters are now, you are totally disconnected to what's happening down the street!!!

    With the internet, I think an emergency management communication protocol would be really cool as well. Something that all web browsers or other devices could monitor for emergency alerts. Even if it just told you where go for more info.

    The practical parts that other people bring up are true... hopefully we won't get alerts every time the "terror alert color" changes from pink to striped. It could be used for political purposes.. or worse in a "Fahrenheit 451" type "go to your door" but the basic technology is very important to have for everybody's sake. Even in a case like 9/11 just telling everybody to go home and be safe would have done a lot. Or in a case like New Orleans where we needed to get people out... a way to broadcast where to go for disaster relief would have reduced the number of stranded people or we could have found them faster.

  79. Silence Your Damn Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they use similar technology to alert people to turn off their cell phones during movies? Meetings? Dinners? Class? Church? Libraries?

  80. Life saving by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You may casually dismiss reverse-911, but if there's a fire in your building you wouldn't be so dismissive as they can warn the residents to get out. Lots of New Yorkers know about reverse-911 for just this reason, just as many people in flood zones know all about reverse-911 from being told high water is coming in.

    I'm not really sure what you are getting at with your last comment but an expanded reverse-911 system that can warn more people of danger can be seen as nothing but a boon to civilization. If they started using it to sell you magazines that would be another thing, but reverse-911 has been around for decades and is NOT abused in any way as it's crucial to leave the 911 system open for only real emergencies.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  81. What about the FCC-mandated "turn the TV on"? by MarsGov · · Score: 1

    A while back the FCC wanted to require that all television sets include technology to receive emergency broadcasts, even when off, and turn themselves on to display the broadcast. Whatever happened to that proposal?

    I agree that sending SMS messages to everyone in the US might be amusing, but that requires hacking into the telco network. Cruising through the streets to activate the neighorhood's TV sets in the middle of the night would probably only require a hand-held transmitter.

    1. Re:What about the FCC-mandated "turn the TV on"? by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      I don't like that idea. Imagine if the FCC turns your TV on after an earthquake when there is a gas leak in your house. KABOOM!

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  82. 'Lead time' determines effectiveness of system by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Simple examples:

    'Hurricaine X will make landfall in 12 hours' - should be enough time to pack up and evacuate or board up and hunker down.

    'Texting' that there has been a terrorist attack (or worse) WWIII has broken out and the ICBMs are on their way is pointless -- mass hysteria is all but guaranteed...Bring on the body count!... :P

    PS: For the 'terrorist attack' the message will give interested parties (that survive) the heads up to either help out, search for loved ones who may have been killed or injured, or keep away during the cleanup.

    This system could be useful, but as shown, it's effectiveness and utility is severely limited....

  83. tests are already under way by serbanp · · Score: 1

    I was driving to work one morning some 3 weeks ago while listening KQED (a public station in San Francisco) when suddendly, after some weird, piercing buzz noises, a voice that felt like those story-tellers in the 50's B-movies said that "this is a test blah blah blah, do not act based on this message etc and this is from DHS". After another set of buzzing signals, the station's program went back.

    It looked like the guys in the show did not even know that their program was run over by the DHS message. How is the message inserted? In the studio, at the antenna level, or it's some sort of jamming-over?

  84. dichotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems all too typical of /. to divide into camps praising or bemoaning some new development because either it's adapting new technology (which is good) or it could be abused (which is bad). I've so far only seen a couple of posts that discuss, for example, its feasability or its impact on the population. Don't love or hate something as an abstraction. Think about what it would actually be.

  85. thanks, but no thanks by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I get enough spam as it is, and the color code for terrorist alerts don't change what I'm doing in the slightest. I'd rather not receive useless cry-wolf text messages and get charged for the displeasure of reading the "alerts"

    Also, "emergency broadcast system" tests are annoying enough as it is when they already interrupt an on-demand movie I'm watching on digital cable. Please confine these to broadcast television, and put them on during commercial breaks, like broadcasters used to do. If I care to learn about homeland security's crying wolf, I'll tune to CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, or HN or check out their web sites.

    Thanks for your understanding.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  86. be afraid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since what most of us are liable to see is just the regular test messages, all that would do is remember people to be scared, something the current administration never gets tired of.

  87. Yes, it was abuse - of gov't power by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    For 35 years, I've been part of family that PLANNED for these things. Now, cuz some idiots WON'T plan, the gov't decides it must take care of us - by forcing us onto roads th day before a CAT-5 WORLD-EATING HURRICANE hits. NO, 1 day is NOT enough time to prepare and leave and actually get far enough away to escape a hurricane that's big enough to justify it. Even if you're not competing for road space with 3 million other people.
    If Rita hadn't weakened and turned north, about a million (no exaggeration) people would have been caught in traffic on the freeways and highways of SE Texas, in 200 mph winds and a 20-30 foot storm surge. As it was, an unannounced number of people died on the roads due to heat, lack of food/water/gas, and most especially, lack of rest. The police on the evacuation routes were NOT LETTING PEOPLE PULL OVER, no matter how long they had been on the road, how old they were, heart conditions, etc. 20+ elderly died on the way to Dallas cuz an unmaintained bus overheated and caught fire; a coworker of mine was found in his car dead. The govt has never reported the loss of life, the damage or cost of the Texas evacuation for hurricane Rita.

    NO FRICKEN THANX, FEMA, I can find much more pleasant ways to kill myself.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    1. Re:Yes, it was abuse - of gov't power by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      But TFA is talking about the alert system used to convey messages. Like you said, there was a major problem with advance notice. Better alert systems can aid that, but only when used in combination with good planning. I am in no way challenging the hardships to which you were subjected, nor am I intending to lesson the tragedy of those who died in transit. This news story is about alert systems, not the judgement of those who control them. Overall, a better alert system will yield a better prepared nation. As your horrible experiences indicate, however, it must be combined with common sense and logistical planning.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  88. As my father has astutely pointed out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they didn't bother to use the system on 9/11, so please stop interupting my television shows with tests of your pointless system.

  89. Two Minute Hate by mrraven · · Score: 1

    It seems post WWII leaders read 1984 as how to book instead of a prescient warning. Whoever moded the parent post as funny is out to lunch it's not very damn funny.

    "In George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Two Minutes Hate is a daily period in which Party members of the society of Oceania must watch a film depicting The Party's enemies (notably Emmanuel Goldstein and his followers) and express their hatred for them and the principles of democracy.

    The film and its accompanying auditory and visual cues (which include a grinding noise that Orwell describes as "of some monstrous machine running without oil") are a form of brainwashing to Party members, attempting to whip them into a frenzy of hatred and loathing for Emmanuel Goldstein and the current enemy superstate. Apparently, it is not unknown for those caught up in the hate to physically assault the telescreen, as Julia does during the scene. The movie, as it progresses becomes more surreal, with Goldstein's face morphing into a sheep as enemy soldiers advance on the viewers, before one such soldier charges at the screen, machine gun blazing. He morphs, finally, into the face of Big Brother at the end of the two minutes. At the end, the mentally, emotionally, and physically exhausted viewers chant "BB" over and over again, ritualistically.

    Orwell's obvious reference in the sequence is to the utter demonization of an enemy during a time of war and the exultation of the cult of personality of the leaders of totalitarian states. Parallels (in form, if not content) to the Two Minutes Hate can be seen in real-world propaganda films from the Second World War."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  90. Re:Two Minute Hate p.s. by mrraven · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Bin Laden was a CIA asset, yes even according to the MSM MSNBC

    "As his unclassified CIA biography states, bin Laden left Saudi Arabia to fight the Soviet army in Afghanistan after Moscow's invasion in 1979. By 1984, he was running a front organization known as Maktab al-Khidamar - the MAK - which funneled money, arms and fighters from the outside world into the Afghan war.

    What the CIA bio conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified form, at least) is that the MAK was nurtured by Pakistan's state security services, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIA's primary conduit for conducting the covert war against Moscow's occupation.

    By no means was Osama bin Laden the leader of Afghanistan's mujahedeen. His money gave him undue prominence in the Afghan struggle, but the vast majority of those who fought and died for Afghanistan's freedom - like the Taliban regime that now holds sway over most of that tortured nation - were Afghan nationals.

    Yet the CIA, concerned about the factionalism of Afghanistan made famous by Rudyard Kipling, found that Arab zealots who flocked to aid the Afghans were easier to "read" than the rivalry-ridden natives. While the Arab volunteers might well prove troublesome later, the agency reasoned, they at least were one-dimensionally anti-Soviet for now. So bin Laden, along with a small group of Islamic militants from Egypt, Pakistan, Lebanon, Syria and Palestinian refugee camps all over the Middle East, became the "reliable" partners of the CIA in its war against Moscow."

    http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3340101/

    The analogy to Goldstein as the fallen inner party member in 1984 though not exact is close enough to give one pause as to the uses of propaganda by the Bush regime.

    "The next moment a hideous, grinding speech, as of some monstrous machine running without oil, burst from the big telescreen at the end of the room. It was a noise that set one's teeth on edge and bristled the hair at the back of one's neck. The Hate had started.

    As usual, the face of Emmanuel Goldstein, the Enemy of the People, had flashed on to the screen. There were hisses here and there among the audience. The little sandy-haired woman gave a squeak of mingled fear and disgust. Goldstein was the renegade and backslider who once, long ago (how long ago, nobody quite remembered), had been one of the leading figures of the Party, almost on a level with Big Brother himself, and then had engaged in counter-revolutionary activities, had been condemned to death, and had mysteriously escaped and disappeared. The programmes of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party's purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching. Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters, perhaps even -- so it was occasionally rumoured -- in some hiding-place in Oceania itself."

    http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/1/

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  91. would have done wonders ??? by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    A lot of people simply can't afford to hit the road for 4-5 days. In order to get away from a hurricane that's big enough to justify running away, (like Katrina), you must go *hundreds* of miles, and I don't mean 2 or 3 hundred.
    A few years back, a hurricane that was Cat 2 when it hit Galveston (near my home), was still a Cat 1 hurricane when it got within a hundred miles of Dallas. (It had a male name, can't remember it - Allen? Daniel?)
    And that was Cat ONE. Katrina, if it had followed the same path, would have been within a hundred miles of Dallas when the eye crossed the coast at Galveston . People see the flat weather map, and don't remember that the tropics are distorted to look smaller and the northern parts (like most of US and Europe) look larger. I've seen hurricane maps where the entire Gulf of Mexico was one big hurricane.
    The hundreds of thousands of poor people in urban areas on the Gulf Coast can't go to Colorado for a week; that's what "poor" means.
    There were LOTS of warnings - everyone knew it was coming. You were either ready to stay, or ready to go. If you weren't ready, life sucked, and maybe you died.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  92. Widespread Pointless Panic by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    Why does everyone assume that the first thing everyone will do is panic, run around like a bunch of headless chickens, and go on some apesh*t looting spree? It is because the people who assume that we are stupid are the ones who really are stupid!
    The people have the right to know why their are black helicopters and men in black covering up things. What they don't want to be informed of is this "counterterrorism" bullsh*t that is so incredibly vague. We want to know what the hell is going on, not of "potential threats". I could be a potential threat. You can be a potential threat. We are all possible potential threats!

    Everyone, reguardless of their background, and I mean all of us, have the capablity of committing unpredictable acts. Noticle how vague that sentence was. Unpredictable. What is unpredicatible? The future. Some of us could all decided to wake up one morning and blow up the bus on the way to work or beat a family member with an alumnium baseball bat. But do we do this? We don't. We chose not to do these things because they are wrong. The same can be said about terrorism.
    While some terrorists plan their attacks days in advance, a majority of terrorists ad lib their plans based in impulsive volition. Take the violence in Israel, Iraq, India, and Indonesia. Most of these people they don't leave behind a paper trail of books and video tapes to threaten us or to send messages post mortem like the Al Qaeda. They just load up, find some random place to execute their attacts and just do it without reguard to the world around them.

    What people need to realize is that their is not religious or monitary motiviations behind violent behavior. These thing occur on the conviction and strong belief that they're going to hell anyway so they may as well take the world with them.

    Some people are lemmings. Plane and simple.

    On the other hand, oppressive abiguous warning does put people into a corner. Some chose to stop cringing in fear. Others choose to become the fear.

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  93. Emergency Alert System by Baricom · · Score: 1

    TFMs are at the FCC site. I'll go ahead and summarize for you.

    EAS is equipped to transmit audio and data warnings (but not video, per se) originated from the President or a variety of national, state, and local government agencies. Broadcasters can also activate EAS locally if there is a need to.

    Most broadcasters are required to have an EAS encoder and decoder (usually the same device) installed. In most cases, the unit is installed between the station's program feed and the transmitter, allowing the unit to automatically override the station's signal when an alert is issued.

    Each EAS device monitors at least two audio feeds. Which feeds are monitored depends on the operating plan for the individual locality, but they can include other broadcast stations, a state or local government agency, or NOAA Radio.

    The buzz noises you heard are called SAME codes (Specific Area Message Encoding). SAME codes are digital tones that convey the orginator of an alert, its type (national notifications, a variety of weather events, AMBER alerts, tests and system administrative messages, and others - around 80 total), the location (accurate to the sub-county level), the date and time of the alert and its duration, and the station that relayed the alert. The SAME code is transmitted three times for redundancy.

    The EAS device decides what to do with the alert based on how it is programmed. Decoders have to be able to store an alert in case a higher-priority alert is being transmitted on its alternate feed. EANs (Emergency Action Notifications) from the President have to go out live. Video services (such as cable and broadcast television) are required to display a visual warning based on the SAME code. This is usually implemented as a message crawl.

    At the end of the alert, the three final bursts are SAME messages that order the EAS decoder to switch back to station audio.

    It's very possible the KQED talent were unaware a message was going out. EAS could have been activated, broadcasted the alert, and shut down, all without the studio knowing. Alternatively, you could have been listening to a tape.

    1. Re:Emergency Alert System by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Hey Baricom,

      Thank you for the information!

      Serban

  94. Yes, it'll totally overload the SMS system by billstewart · · Score: 1
    There's been a good bit of discussion about this on several of the telecom-related mailing lists. Sending an SMS to everybody in Podunk can work. Sending an SMS to everybody in a large city will overload the SMS system for a while, and as somebody here said, it'll do it just when the SMS system needs to be workable. Sending an SMS to everybody in Manhattan is impossible by an order of magnitude or two. And if you *could* get a message to everybody, telling everybody in Manhattan or LA to panic is unthinkably stupid. And of course, in the US, sending messages to people who get charged for receiving text messages is just asking for trouble :-)

    If there's a broadcast channel that can be used for this application, that's at least technically realistic, if not socially.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  95. Of *course* it's for propaganda purposes by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's from the Department of Homeland Security, whose two main jobs are keeping the American public afraid while reassuring everybody that Big Daddy Government will take care of them if they just give up a bit more of their civil liberties and taking away our civil liberties. Of *course* it'll be used for propaganda - even if there's a real emergency. Even the fact that they want to deploy it in the first place is propaganda.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  96. Rules are easy to change by billstewart · · Score: 1
    It's easy to change rules, even if the rules say only the President can do something. If the rules are part of the law, it's a bit harder to change than if the rules are the general type where the detailed versions get written by executive branch bureaucracies. Under President Bush, all the President has to do is issue a "signing statement" about how he feels like interpreting the law and it doesn't even matter what the text of a law said, and the Congress is currently controlled by Republicans if they do want to change legislation.

    Sometimes when rules get made by the Supreme Court they stick around for a while. Most other rules aren't very solid.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  97. DHS threat level color system by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's pretty straightforward - Yellow is "Wolf Wolf Wolf!", orange is "Wolf wolf wolf wolf!" .

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  98. Emergency Broadcast System notifications by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the good information!

    The first time I heard an Emergency Broadcast System announcement on a car radio at ~9 at night that said "This is not a test." it scared the crap out of me - after growing up during the Cold War, learning all through school that the EBS warning meant we should get down under our desks and kiss our asses goodbye, and working in a radio station where we did the EBS test at some regular weekly timeslot like Tuesdays at noon, it was really a surprise to find out that they were now using it for actual localized emergencies (this one was a flood warning) rather than Global Thermonuclear War. I think there was still a Soviet Union at the time, or at least large remnants of one, but there hadn't been any sabre-rattling going on in the news that would have made an attack likely.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  99. Britain won the war on terror years ago... by tumbleweedsi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I grew up with fear all around me. As the son of a naval officer I remember very clearly the day we were all told at (boarding) school not to use our parents military titles on letters addressed home because it was a terrorist threat. I also remember the mirror on a stick which was issued to my father to check for bombs under the wheel arches.

    Of course all this was back in the days before the USA thought that funding terrorist organisations was a bad thing. This was back in the days when America openly funded the IRA through a variety of front organisations in the same way that many of the countries they now bully also do.

    I am sick of hearing what homeland security is doing to make the US people more scared. By trying to put all these pointless measures in place they only serve to make the people feel more insecure and fearful. Rather than concentrating on these useless measures to defend yourself why not look at the reasons so many countries hate the US and address those problems first?

    It is a common misconception that Americans have that all the little brown people in far off lands hate the freedom of the USA and are anti democracy... this simply is not true. They are anti decades of US meddling in their area. They are anti globalised US corporations raping their natural resources and they are also anti CIA tinkering with their chosen government.

    I was in the US on 11/9 and witnessed a nation change in a way similar to watching the school bully get kicked in the shins by one of its victims and then go crying to the teacher. During July last year I saw Britain, and in particular London, deal with the aftermath in a more pragmatic way.

    There is currently more chance of being hit by a bus than being blown up by a terrorist, so you take reasonable precautions and get on with your life without banning buses. There is more change having a heart attack than being killed by a bomb, so you take reasonable precautions but don't live in fear. There is more chance of your daughter getting raped than being killed by a terrorist bomb (yes, that's one in three all you caring fathers) but I bet the government has not spent anywhere near as much money trying to safeguard people against that threat.

    In America the terrorists achieved a nation gripped with fear. The US is full of worried people. The government does not how to make them feel safe so it makes them feel even more scared by validating the threat.

    In Britain we live under a constant threat but do not let it upset our daily lives. I was on the tube a few days after the bombings last July and my little brother (11 years old) told me that he was a little scared and I explained that fear is the objective so we do not stop doing what we are doing and carry on with our lives regardless... that's the way to win the war on terror.

    --
    Be nice, sponsor me: http://jailbreak.ragabonds.org.uk
  100. All your base already belong to them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SMS Aleart From Department Of Homeland Security

    The Terrorist group "The Coalition Of Creditor Nations" is invading the US in order to repo our stuff. Luckily the security systems in our airports will protect the security systems in our airports from those who financed them. Terror. Terror. Stay the course. Weapons of mass destruction.

    http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

    $2000 per year for every man, woman and child is the going rate. And don't forget all those boxes coming back from Iraq...Iran...Iraq...which one was it?

  101. DHS alerts by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a joke on the comedy channel. The comic says, for 50 years, we had to listen to the annoying interruption, "This is an test of the emergency broadcast system. If this had been an emergency, this message would have been followed by an announcement telling us where to go and what to do. Well, on 9/11, there was no Announcement telling us where to go and what to do. Seems like an incredible waste of time and effort." However, the other joke was that Congress had build bunkers for themselves, but not the "little people". We joke about the Soviets, but their disaster planning was organized and methodical. I am sure it was full of holes and beareteic logistics, but it was far better coordinated. I guess if you had the money, you used your private funds to build a fall out shelter, something that I hear was popular in the 50's. In 12 years of schooling, we only had one "Emergency Attack Planning Drill". Maybe having too many might make too many people rethink the MAD strategee. Hey, people might even rebell and decide to rid the world of nuclear weopeons or the 60's "Give Peace a Chance". Ironically, in the US in the 90's, the slogan became, "Give War a Chance". Fundametally, with this sort of attitude on both sides of the Iron Curtain, I am quite surprised that an all-out nuclear war never materiallized. Hell, the USSR would be destroyed 200 times over, while the US would have surived 80% (according to Edward Teller). Maybe if Yuri Andropov had survived, and Gorbechov never rose to Primir status, that would have been the likely outcome. Stalin was committed to insuring the survival of the USSR. Whatever you might think of him, Stalin did insure that the USSR never collapsed under his reign, one in which the USSR was fundamentally far more weaker than it was in the 90's.

  102. nobody else asked so.. by deviceb · · Score: 1

    does DHS run on Linux?

    --
    Kill your TV
  103. Spoofing by phorm · · Score: 1

    For cellphones, etc... how hard would it be to mass-mail a spoofed message for those phones capable of recieving email-to-SMS messages?