Slashdot Mirror


Welcome to The Age of the Web Hermit

tyroneking writes "Phil Hartup on bit-tech.net has captured the Zeitgeist of the web-aware generation: The Age of the Web Hermit describes how some lucky souls can live their lives, earn money, buy necessities and even find love on the Internet. 'Is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more?'; not me!"

264 comments

  1. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more?
    Pussy comes to mind.
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs that when you have pr0n. Relationships are for chumps anyway and bitches ain't shit but hos and tricks.

    2. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      In many places in this wide world, you can get pussy delivered.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:What? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    4. Re:What? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      taking a shit.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    5. Re:What? by sevinkey · · Score: 1

      My wife gives me all the pussy I need. And she delivers beer now that she works with me at home! :D

      I sometimes don't leave my house for a week at a time.

    6. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't find porn on the web? Your monitor must be turned off.

    7. Re:What? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In many places in this wide world, you can get pussy delivered.


      Only on Slashdot could this be modded "Interesting".

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    8. Re:What? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

      What, never heard of russian brides? They've all gone to the internet now.

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    9. Re:What? by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 1

      Only a slashdot obligatrist (coin) would assume only slashdot would find 'Interesting' demand delivery sex service. I assure its appeal is vast among all populations capable of affording it.

      / the (coin) being both the act of wordsmithing as well as the MarioBROS((c)Nintendo)) sound to accompany it

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    10. Re:What? by Youx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Problem solved :
      http://www.fu-fme.com/

    11. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      30% Interesting 40% Redundant 30% Underrated

      The sad thing is that when I made the comment, it was not redundant. But then, you can't expect moderators to actually read and/or follow the guidelines.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:What? by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't look at me. I modded it "Informative."

    13. Re:What? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      You're kidding nobody Cletus, your "house" previously had wheels, didn't it.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    14. Re:What? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well I met my gf and exgf online.

      So yeah, I can get pussy. :-)

      And a hot babe and gf with it. :-)

    15. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And a hot babe and gf with it. :-)

      Just try to makes sure they never meet. Unless of course you think they'd be down for that sort of thing ;)

    16. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    17. Re:What? by Eevee · · Score: 2, Funny
    18. Re:What? by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      Well, not anymore, by posting here you just reversed your modding.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    19. Re:What? by pedalman · · Score: 1
      In many places in this wide world, you can get pussy delivered.
      Really? And if the shipping address is Mom's basement?
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    20. Re:What? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      No. . . . but a **good** HOWTO might get permanently Slashdotted. . .

    21. Re:What? by creepynut · · Score: 1

      It's for the best :)

    22. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I'm so bad with woman I can't even get the ugly/desprate ones. This applys to both IRL and in the virtual world. I've tried hooking up with 'women' in WoW and FFXI, dating sites, and in the realworld. It sucks to be so antisocial in life that it carries over to the virtual world.

    23. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      In many places in this wide world, you can get pussy delivered.
      Really? And if the shipping address is Mom's basement?

      Well then in your case, you can just order down from upstairs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. You mean besides SEX?! by twofidyKidd · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Internet cannot get you drunk. I should know, I've tried.

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    1. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You can have alcoholic beverages delivered to your home, just like you can have food delivered.

    2. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by Clinton · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh come on, just go into your favorite AOL chat room and take a drink of beer every time you see LOL. You'll be drunk in no time!

      --
      Half the time I'm right, the other half you're wrong.
    3. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by jizziknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, you can still have "sex" on the internet, but in the end, you're still servicing yourself.

      Really, the only thing you can't get from the internet is any sort of real, live, physical human contact (ignoring the fact that you can probably order a hooker online, but they still have to come to your home or wherever to provide any "service").

      --
      Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
    4. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've actually had absinthe delivered from Germany. Something I couldn't buy even if I ventured from my house.

    5. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Getting busted for ordering untaxed cigarettes and booze is up there with High Treason now, right?

    6. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Funny

      Physical contact?
      Pff... your hardware is obviously obsolete.

    7. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by JeffHunt · · Score: 1

      The Internet cannot get you drunk. I should know, I've tried.

      But, the Internet is more fun when you're drunk. I have amply demonstrated this to my friends through MySpace.

      --

      "It was hell!" recalls former child.

    8. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by SP33doh · · Score: 0

      PS2 can get you high though, trust me, I've played rez.

    9. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by galgon · · Score: 1
      The Internet cannot get you drunk. I should know, I've tried.


      I guess you have not tried very hard.

      Even Woot can get you drunk
    10. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by fafalone · · Score: 1

      You can, however, use the internet to purchase alcohol and have it delivered to your door. Same goes for every other drug, legal or illegal, even hard drugs. And that's the point, to not venture out into the 'real' world.

    11. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by markass530 · · Score: 1

      drunken blogging is a fun habbit of mine, and my readership went up after I started posting the drunk blogs

    12. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by chrish · · Score: 1

      Not paying taxes is terrorism, unless you're rich and/or a large corporation.

      --
      - chrish
    13. Re:You mean besides SEX?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually had absinthe delivered from Germany. Something I couldn't buy even if I ventured from my house.

      Unless you either lived in or ventured to Germany, apparently. ;)

  3. The internet... by Mikachu · · Score: 2, Funny

    The internet: the only place where you can change your penis size.

    1. Re:The internet... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah yes, but don't you have to put on your robe and wizard hat first before casting that level 13 Scroll of Engorging?

    2. Re:The internet... by RainingBlood · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about that. My penis seems to change size quite well in my girlfriends bed. Hmm, maybe I don't really belong in this thread...

    3. Re:The internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? I'm truly impressed, moderators!

    4. Re:The internet... by denim · · Score: 1

      I am so glad I don't have any points today, or I'd be tempted to use them on this thread too.

      --
      Being quick to take offense is not a virtue.
    5. Re:The internet... by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can change your penis size anywhere as long as you have something sharp enough.

    6. Re:The internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? I'm truly impressed, moderators!

      And yet, you do not question the "Informative" mod. Very telling.

      (it's funnier if you ignore that the informative mod occurred after parent's comment)

  4. Maybe I'm there... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, if you consider "reading Slashdot" as "going out and socializing"....

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Maybe I'm there... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Speaking as an abstainer in a country where socializing equates to "getting very, very drunk", I can safely say that reading Slashdot trumps socializing every single time.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Maybe I'm there... by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or perhaps you just need new friends. My friends and I go out plenty of times without resorting to getting plastered.

      Its called being comfortable with yourself so you don't have to get drunk and act like you're not yourself

    3. Re:Maybe I'm there... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, you can't just order new friends over the Internet to be delivered to your doorstep. Depending on where you live / who else lives nearby / where you work / how much free time you have and a number of other factors like that, you may or may not be able to find a suitable set of convenient friends. As for the inconvenient friends, well.... then you have the Internet.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:Maybe I'm there... by G-funk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Psst! Here's a tip. It's not staying off the booze that makes regular people not want to go out with you guys, it's your attitude. Whenever my mates go out there's always a couple of people who don't drink, or *gasp* just have a couple. And nobody cares. I know Timmy the jock made fun of you for not being able to drink a whole six-pack (wow) when you were 16, but people grow up.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:Maybe I'm there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm of the belief that there are a lot of people out there that give good potential to be great friends. Say 1-10% of the population (that's great friends, not people you put up with or are acquaintences with). Even if .1% or similar, that's a HUGE number of people when you are talking at least millions of people out there one might run into (potentially billions if you travel a lot but many don't given how we live).

      But at 1-5% or less, it becomes a resource management issue. Such a low percentage means you have to interact with 99% of assholes and other folks before you find that 1%. And the interaction can be of varying lengths before that discovery is made; I've had impressive initial interactions with people that have then turned out to be very nasty, fake, silly individuals at heart, and very poor initial interactions with people who have turned out to be amongst my best friends.

      And it's all a lot of work and energy. Meeting 100 people, much less 100 people in-depth, is a lot of work. Don't forget, you might have family, have to eat, work, exercise, read, learn, etc. and all that through the day, most our friends are that of coincidence with other aspects of our lives.

      So, the percentage one runs into that end up being good friends, that's the problem. You have to pour a lot of time into meeting people, weed out folks, and that's just on your end. Friendship is bi-directional--they have to consider you a friend as well and be open to having "new friends." Surprisingly, many people are set in their ways and aren't open to meeting new people--they already have their friends, have family, career, etc.

      Put another way, the number of people whose times to meet, intelligence, geographical area, and (roughly) interests overlap are quite rare. Combine that with like minds in forming a friendship, and the results are lower.

      And this is also why the internet, with meetups and matchmaking works.

    6. Re:Maybe I'm there... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've got that reversed. It's not that the drunk people don't want to hang out with sober people, it's that sober people don't want to hang out with drunk people. I'll have some wine or hard lemonade every now and then, but I'm over the stage where I enjoyed getting plastered, and now people just look like idiots to me when they're drunk, and not in an entertaining way.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    7. Re:Maybe I'm there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you guys, but I get drunk for the purpose of acting like an idiot, and blaming it on the alcohol later!

    8. Re:Maybe I'm there... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...but I'm over the stage where I enjoyed getting plastered..."

      Hmm...exactly how does THAT happen? That is quite sad....hope it never happens to me.

      Everything goes better with booze....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Maybe I'm there... by PMuse · · Score: 1

      OK, everyone! Listen up: the line to immigrate to his country forms right behind me. B-)

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    10. Re:Maybe I'm there... by 955301 · · Score: 1

      Looks like everyone is reversed. This from a woman who's first blog entry ends with

      "Josey is my sexy husband. He's going to open a gamer cafe this summer and it's going to be sooo cool. But now he has to talk to me because he's so cute. "

      Try not to generalize when talking about all the other idiots in the world, okay?

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    11. Re:Maybe I'm there... by bazorg · · Score: 3, Funny

      people just look like idiots to me when they're drunk, and not in an entertaining way.
      Don't blame them for that, they're semi-conscious. As the conscious one, you're in charge of making things entertaining. Just don't forget to take your camera with you when you go out with your drunken friends. After a few "priceless" pictures, they should reconsider their ways :)

    12. Re:Maybe I'm there... by cliath · · Score: 1

      Some people don't have to get over that stage because they don't even go through it. I've never seen the point in drinking. I have not been drunk since my 21st birthday, which also happened to be the first time I ever consumed enough alcohol to get me intoxicated.

    13. Re:Maybe I'm there... by hab136 · · Score: 1
      Hmm...exactly how does THAT happen? That is quite sad....hope it never happens to me.
      Everything goes better with booze....

      Personally, I cut back around 25 or 26 years old. I'm not dry, but most weeks I won't drink anything. 2 or 3 drinks when I do (over 2 or 3 hours).

      This is from someone that used to drink every day, and bartenders knew me when I walked in the door. I'd drink anyone under the table, and was damn proud of it.

      I'm not the same person I was at 21 - I've had good times and bad, and I've matured from them. Staying the same person forever - never learning anything, never growing - sucks.

      I don't feel bad about my time drinking; it was a lot of fun! It's just that there's other things to do, other ways to be.

    14. Re:Maybe I'm there... by denim · · Score: 1

      Now that should be modded "insightful".

      --
      Being quick to take offense is not a virtue.
    15. Re:Maybe I'm there... by denim · · Score: 1

      There are ways to concentrate the potential friends in particular locations. They're called "meetings". Such as SCA gatherings, or science fiction club meetings. Figure what your interests are and use them as a filter to have only people who share your interests.

      Granted, I don't do it much either, but I have an idea how.

      --
      Being quick to take offense is not a virtue.
    16. Re:Maybe I'm there... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      Well, it does depend on the person. One of my boys from college will literally start whining like a puppy if he goes out with a group, and then don't all take the shots he buys. Which gets to be a problem, since he tends to drink a lot...

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    17. Re:Maybe I'm there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering what country has absolutely no activity outside of being a drunk.

      Judging on this and other posts I've seen from you my guess is that you're a loser and unless everyone acts just like you you feel that they're losers. Get over yourself.

      Ultimately the truth is that you're probably an anti-social loser who likes to use self pity to put up with himself. And to top that off, frankly, you're a bore.

    18. Re:Maybe I'm there... by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you are married and not in college (I assume). You *should* be past the stage of going out and getting plastered. You should have a collection of like minded professionals whom you have over for backyard barbeques and dinner parties while discussing politics, current events, sports or whatever you are into. Which I'm sure you do, but these other posters seem to think that the only thing "friends" are good for is going out to bar and getting hammered. Otherwise you might as well sit home and "hang out" on slashdot. This is probably the case because the average slashdotter doesn't find that they have much in common with the average person.

      There are two solutions to that. Find like minded people with whom you can discuss your hobbies or maybe even help you with one of your projects (like that girlfriend you've been building in the basement). Or, alternatively, you can grow from that flat unidemensional person that you have become into a multidemensional person with lots of interests and hobbies. Take a dance class or some martial arts, go skydiving, join a chessclub, just once take home the ugliest girl in the bar, whatever floats your boat, just come out of the shoebox and live life.....and make some friends.

    19. Re:Maybe I'm there... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      By the way, no-one's impressed by how mature and superior you are that you don't like drinking. You're the alcohol equivalent of the onion man who doesn't own a television.

    20. Re:Maybe I'm there... by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I don't like drinking, in fact quite the opposite. The point I was trying to make is that if doesn't like going out and getting drunk or feeling like he is pressured into doing so, he might want to consider making new friends.

    21. Re:Maybe I'm there... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      there are a lot of people out there that give good potential to be great friends... not people you put up with or are acquaintences with
      The proportion is about one in a billion, I would say. Anyone who has more than about half a dozen "great friends" must be using the phrase in a very loose sense.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:Maybe I'm there... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I don't remember who said it...Dean Martin, or may WC Fields...but it went something like:

      "I feel sorry for teetotallers...when they wake up in the morning, that is the best they will feel all day...."

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:Maybe I'm there... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Well yes, some people are just dicks :)

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  5. I was going to post something witty... by tyroneking · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... and incisive along the lines that I submitted the story and got to first-post it as well but I was beaten to the ... err ... post.
    Oh well - I'm still happy to get a story posted and this will spur me on the become even more of a hermit ....

    1. Re:I was going to post something witty... by tyroneking · · Score: 1

      "spur me on TO become even more of a hermit ...."

  6. Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... then you're probably pretty much connected to the Real World. Running water, power, fancy new video boards... someone in the real world is providing those items.

    I don't think this is any more isolation than a serious resident of the library used to be 50 years ago. And when people in NY figured out (decades ago) that they could, say, write books for a living and have Chinese delivered at 3:00AM... it's scarecely different. In fact, I'd argue that a lot people who used to be hermits (or would have been if they were born 20 years earlier) are probalby more connected to the real world because the internet exists.

    Unless, as I suspect, I'm currently typing this text into a big, scalable, and very flawed Turing test machine. If a response is posted to this, its non-sequitor-ness will prove my suspicions. Go!

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure? What makes you feel this way?

    2. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you sure? What makes you feel this way?

      Hah! I knew it!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, non-sequitor-ness is cliché.

    4. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice Eliza quote.

    5. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by MrPsycho · · Score: 0

      Thanks, this made me laugh a lot.

    6. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      people in NY figured out (decades ago) that they could, say, write books for a living and have Chinese delivered at 3:00AM... it's scarecely different.

      And she was pretty, too :-P

    7. Re:Unless you also use your laptop as a commode... by humble.fool · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Are you sure about that? What makes you feel this way?

      --
      Being anonymous is not cowardice.
  7. Shut-ins by Bullfish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There have always been shut-ins. The net just gives them more to do behind their drawn curtains and locked doors. Some people may see this as cool, but in the long run we look as such people as kooky. We all need to interact with others, that is just our nature. We are social creatures whether we like it or not. Some more so than others to be sure, but still.

    Can you live locked in a basement having evrything shipped to you and slid under the door? Sure, but to me that sounds very much like prison.

    No thanks.

    1. Re:Shut-ins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison with a fat pipe wouldn't be that bad. :X

      Besides, there are millions of middle aged people now raiding in WoW on school nights and weekends. Some people call them 'shut ins', others call them 'well geared'!

    2. Re:Shut-ins by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, humans as a species require social interaction. I cannot deny that with all the classes and information I've studied in both psychology and sociology. Though isn't is possible to somewhat replace physical interaction with someone with interaction online? We are interacting right now? Granted its hard for me to read your body language, facial expression, etc. I feel that as we continue to progress in technology, as video/audio chat gets better and better. Then the next jump to whatever (VR?) that what constitues human interaction may need to reworked.

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
    3. Re:Shut-ins by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um...plenty o' fat pipes in prison.

      It's just sorta like Soviet Russia.

      You don't use the pipe to access society, (prison) society uses the pipe to access YOU!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    4. Re:Shut-ins by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For those who would be shut-ins anyway this bundle of tubes provides a way to socialize. People need to interact, but they're always finding new ways to do it online: /. threads, forums, blogs and blog comments, chat rooms, Second Life, etc. There's a problem when a person who would otherwise be out socializing becomes a shut-in. But for those who are more comfortable as shut-ins there are new ways to socialize.

    5. Re:Shut-ins by Surt · · Score: 1

      But if you face the walls the right direction, it makes for the very best kind of prison.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:Shut-ins by TexasDex · · Score: 1

      Prison is just a question of choice. Some would call it sanctuary.

      --
      The Cheese Stands Alone.
    7. Re:Shut-ins by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thoreau is popularly, but erroneously, regarded as a hermit.

      In fact he not only traveled and socialized widely, even during his years at Walden pond, but even wrote in Walden, his journal of his experiment in minimalist living, that social interaction is one of the minimum requirements of human life.

      And he didn't mean some form correspondence by that. The Internet only provides social interaction by correspondence.

      Melville has been put forward as an example of the true writing solitary, but he had to live in a city with other people to support his solitude. In fact, ironically, he had to have a wife to pull it off.

      Thoreau could live alone in the woods as a "half and half" solitary because he was willing to go to the city and interact with people face to face in order to meet his needs. And never married.

      As others have pointed out your basic Internet hermit only exists within the framework of a vast civilized superstructure to supply his solitude. He is alone among many. A shut in, yes, but a very peculiar kind of "hermit," a word which has always implied true isolation and dependence on self.

      A while ago I was showing someone plans for a boat I had designed to sail the Atlantic alone. Their first question was not about the danger of the undertaking, but "Won't you get lonely?"

      I replied, "Why? I'm pretty good company, aren't I?"

      I can go weeks without any human contact whatsoever and not mind at all. I rather enjoy it now and again. I'm better company than most. But there comes a time. . .

      As a lifelong "solitary," frankly, I think some of you need to get out more.

      KFG

    8. Re:Shut-ins by bunhed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh man, I don't even want to think about the /. forums with all those faces and voices in a tiny little window.

    9. Re:Shut-ins by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Why is that kind of behaviour tolerated in your prisons?

    10. Re:Shut-ins by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's still not the same as real socializing. get a bunch of people that visit message boards to actually meet each other and you will find that the shut-in types are still uncomfortable and will position themselves near the edge of the group. If anyone is talking to them, it's because the other person initiated it. Get too high of a concentration of the shut-ins and the party bombs. Been there, done that. Even if I only get to talk to 1 or 2 people, it's still much, much better than the message board. but it's better than trying to go to "normal" social spots. Being alone while in a crowd of people at a bar or concert sucks.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    11. Re:Shut-ins by PMuse · · Score: 1

      There have always been shut-ins. The net just . . . lets us them interact with us!

      Wait a minute . . .

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    12. Re:Shut-ins by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not everyone is sociable, or wants to be. It isn't a matter of being "cool," but just one of needing solitude, or perhaps of finding it preferable to the alternative. I doubt that one can really understand people by assuming they're all alike. My point is that, to you, reclusivity may seem like prison, but to me, gregariousness seems shallow. How much inane chitchat do you really need in your life? Are you incapable of sitting quietly with your own thoughts? Many people are, it seems. But instead of realizing that they lack the inner resources of solitary people, they leap to the conclusion that everyone who isn't exactly like them is maladjusted and unhealthy. How comforting it must be to pity everyone who isn't like you. There is nothing wrong with solitude, but there is something wrong with being unable to be alone. If you couldn't fathom going a week without speaking to anyone, that just means you're shallow. Given a choice between an evening if vapid small-talk and an evening at home reading William Blake, I'll take the book. One of these actually makes me feel and think, while the other is just a penalty I have to occasionally pay so people like you won't start spreading the rumor that I'm mentally deranged so similar crap.

      Yes, there are mentally unwell people who happen to be loners. That doesn't mean they typify the class.

    13. Re:Shut-ins by Keichann · · Score: 1

      Essentially there's little difference between the two, but for these shut-ins the boundaries are a little better defined and far more honest. The social creatures argument and needing to interact is an appeal to nature, and obviously these people don't feel that way? So either your definition of nature is wrong, or the implication is that they're unnatural.

      To some the question may be would I rather be in prison than in wage-slavery in a dishonest society?

      > but in the long run we look as such people as kooky

      Who's the "we" here? ;)

    14. Re:Shut-ins by atokata · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's so much a matter of tolerance, more a matter of overcrowding.

    15. Re:Shut-ins by mantar · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with your statements, but I do think that this issue transcends the social aspect of humanity. We human beings not only crave personal interaction with others, but we also crave physical interaction with others in the real world. For instance, when the personal computer first arrived, many people were predicting a paper-less society by the 90's. The technology is certainly there to make this a reality, so why is my desk still cluttered with binders full of spec sheets, and printed email correspondence? It's the tactile feedback that holding a piece of paper provides, or turning the pages of a book. We humans tend to prefer interacting with real objects, and real people.

      As for the hermits that don't, it seems to me that these people will always be the "odd-balls". Whether or not their seclusion includes a computer and an internet connection, they are still oddities of nature. You just can't undo thousands of years of human civilization and human experience in a matter of decades.

      --
      # man tar
    16. Re:Shut-ins by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      That's what you get with sodomy laws...

      Prison is just school for criminals.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    17. Re:Shut-ins by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      We human beings not only crave personal interaction with others, but we also crave physical interaction with others in the real world.

      Most of us. Careful with the generalizations, there.

      Whether or not their seclusion includes a computer and an internet connection, they are still oddities of nature.

      I agree, but so what? Seclusion with an internet connection still beats seclusion without, hands down. Yes, there are undoubtedly some people caught in a web-hermit rut who would be much happier if they got out more. But there are also people - oddities of nature, maybe, but still people - who truly cannot cope with "getting out more". I don't think it's helpful to stigmatize what may be their only social contact.

    18. Re:Shut-ins by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Can you live locked in a basement having evrything shipped to you and slid under the door? Sure, but to me that sounds very much like prison.
      I'd say "prison" is all about who has the keys. For 3 months after a severe injury I spent almost all my time in one room, people delivering my food, mostly just watching TV or reading. I was even "confined", in the sense that I wasn't able to go anywhere without being wheeled there on a gurney. Still, it wasn't prison.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    19. Re:Shut-ins by mantar · · Score: 1

      Most of us. Careful with the generalizations, there.

      How is saying that every human being by nature craves physical interaction a generalization? We can't escape our nature... It's not like we're given the option to choose which aspects of human nature we want and those that we don't before we're born. Jeez, I never thought I'd get called on the carpet for calling a human a human.

      I don't think it's helpful to stigmatize what may be their only social contact.

      That wasn't my point. I never said that these people shouldn't socialize on the internet... all I said was that these people are the exception. It's true that there are some people who have been conditioned by one stimuli or another to supress certain aspects of their nature (in this case, the desire for personal and physical interaction).

      --
      # man tar
    20. Re:Shut-ins by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We all need to interact with others, that is just our nature.

      Don't forget, this is Slashdot.

    21. Re:Shut-ins by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Was going to mod you up, as I live much the same; but then I thought of Edward Abbey, and just had to mention him :-)

        Agreed. Sometimes one just needs to get away from all this and be oneself... it's something I think more people need to do, if even once in a while, according to their need. Insociety, too often, one can't be oneself, 'cept perhaps with the rare friend.

        That said, I'm way overdue... ;-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    22. Re:Shut-ins by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      The largest economic power in the world can't afford to build more prisons? Is there any data to support your claim of overcrowding?

    23. Re:Shut-ins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How is saying that every human being by nature craves physical interaction a generalization? We can't escape our nature"..

      How is "every human being" NOT a generalization??

      If you limit the definition of "physical interaction" to the reproductive instinct, it's definitely in "our nature". Apart from that, any craving for social interaction is learned behavior.

    24. Re:Shut-ins by drsquare · · Score: 2

      People with no social interaction, who do nothing but listen to their own thoughts, usually end up mad or depressed, often both.

    25. Re:Shut-ins by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      try googling "US prison overcrowding" you'll find numerous references...

      Now as to whether we can or can't afford to build more prisons, that's a matter of actually taxing people. Something the current administration feels is apparently more 'cruel and unusual' punishment than say, torture.

      Just color me one spec of blue in a red state.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    26. Re:Shut-ins by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
      You're quantifying this based on what data set? A few weirdos do not a theory make. Ted Kaczynski is a loner, but Charles Manson is not--we learn from this that people are people, and that madness spans the gamut of sociability. Most "crazy" loners are wanna-be popular people who just can't find anyone to like them. Serial killers, for example, usually kill out of resentment of not being liked, not out of a profound indifference to the existence of their victims. They want to be popular, or powerful, or desirable, all qualities that require the admiration and presence of the people who become their victims. Most depressives want to be liked, but can't manage because of quirkiness or whatever. These are not sincere, authentic loners, just a few more failed social butterflies. If they'd stay at home and read William Blake instead (or Emerson, perhaps) they'd be perfectly happy and everyone would be better off. It's not my fault that some shallow people get depressed because no one likes them.

      You're only taking into account the loners who are unhappy to be loners, which means that your conclusion is both guaranteed and meaningless. Also, you shouldn't oversimplify and posit that I'm advocating no social interaction. I'm interacting with you, aren't I?

    27. Re:Shut-ins by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      A lot of people over here feel that the following reasoning makes complete sense:

      "Well, if they didn't want to be ass-raped, they shouldn't have committed a crime!"

      I think there also tends to be a lot of feelings of vengeance or apathy against the faceless criminal population that make people accept such rumors as truth, then not do anything to combat it. This, in my opinion, is also the source of support for the death penalty over here, but that's another debate.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    28. Re:Shut-ins by mantar · · Score: 1

      Ah, final word goes to the Anonymous Coward. Good for you! Next time, grow some balls and resist clicking that little check box before posting. If you can't stand by your comments, I don't want to hear them.

      Apart from that, any craving for social interaction is learned behavior.

      No! Any skill in social interaction is learned behavior... the desire for it is in our nature!

      BTW, if any of you web hermits are listening, I truly apologize for "generalizing" and lumping you all into a group with the rest of us. I apologize for calling you a human being, but if my suspicions are correct, some of your hermit brethren have been doing a great job arguing that you guys are not in fact humans, with the same nature as the rest of us. So, since this conversation has degraded to this point, I'll just ask this question: what planet are you hermits from?

      --
      # man tar
    29. Re:Shut-ins by AdamInChains · · Score: 1

      "How comforting it must be to pity everyone who isn't like you. There is nothing wrong with solitude, but there is something wrong with being unable to be alone." You seem to be contradicting yourself. Why is solitude better than socializing? You are talking down upon and giving pity to people that would rather socialize than be alone. Some of these people may think being a social hermit is weird. But here you are thinking social people (which are not "like you") have issues and have something wrong with them because they do not like being alone. Just the other side of the rainbow as you. Each side looks down upton the other for being different. And you're not an exception to this. Neither is right or wrong, just different.

    30. Re:Shut-ins by gatzby3jr · · Score: 0

      For someone who doesn't think you can understand people by assuming they're all alike, you sure do a good job blanketing people 'not like you' into a category of 'shallow'. You should take your own advice and not assume that just because someone isn't like you that they are inferior or 'shallow', just as you request people not assume that if you're quiet, you're 'deranged'.

    31. Re:Shut-ins by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .then I thought of Edward Abbey. . .

      Oh Jesus, don't get me started on the parks "industry." If you've read my posts for any length of time you know that I have a habit, now and again, of going all "mountain man." Not "camping" or "hiking" in the approved manner, but simply wandering off into the woods and living as a natural animal in the natural environment for a time.

      It has reached the point where I am compeled to be a criminal to do this. The "natural environment" has acquired "rules."

      KFG

    32. Re:Shut-ins by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Understood. I, too, escape syphilization occasionally. Will be doing it again this fall. It's simply necessary... heading for Wind River country.

        I hope you get to sail that boat one day, somewhere where clock-wise is not mandatory ;-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    33. Re:Shut-ins by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
      But here you are thinking social people (which are not "like you") have issues and have something wrong with them because they do not like being alone
      Actually no, you've oversimplified my point considerably. I didn't say that sociable people had something wrong with them, but people who are unable to be alone had something wrong with them. Clearly an inability to sit alone with one's thoughts implies a certain incapacity, no? Just as a need for solitude, taken to the point of agoraphobia or other mania, is pathological, the need to be with others can be taken to a pathological level if you're so codependent that you can't be alone for a few minutes. I prefer to be alone--that doesn't mean I decay into catatonia if I must be around others for the evening. But yes, many of those with an inability to understand why one would want to be alone are indeed shallow, as evidenced by the fact that they can't even contemplate the idea of being alone for an evening. They lack inner resources, the ability to sit quietly with one's thoughts. They're the ones who can't entertain themselves, who won't shut up, who always need affirmation and approval, and always need some type of distraction so they don't have to fall back on what's in their own head. Not all sociable people are like that, nor did I say they were.

      The only ones I find objectionable are the ones who fit my description. That you feel a need to oversimplify my post so you have an excuse to be offended indicates that you're a little sensitive on the issue. But oddly, though you try to be even-handed, you only objected to my criticism of them, not to their criticism of me. Methinks you doth protest too much.

    34. Re:Shut-ins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      For quite some time I have lived the life of a recluse (I have even been rather reclusive on the Internet before now-I have an account made here years ago in the lower 6-digit range that has no more than 30 or so posts, and before now I have not made comments without it here), but lately I have become aware of an encompassing pain, a dull ache, that has prompted me to investigate how to restore relationships with other people. I have not needed to work because my investments provide enough for me to live on and have for some time. I have had significant lung and nerve damage such that for a long time I walked with a significant limp and could not project enough to allow people to comprehend what I was saying. Also, my memory is fragmentary. These things led me to destroy the friendships I had and have prevented any new ones from forming for many years before now. I want to change this now, though I still feel I need to improve myself before I can go out again, I know this. To be honest I have forgotten how to make friends and my only memories of any thing like intimacy are few and so fragmentary as to hinder more than help, with one exception. It is for this exception that I worked to recover afterwards, but my disabilities made me so embarrassed that I felt compelled to avoid her and so have not spoken to her for years. Have any others here experienced similar and/or successfully conquered the embarrassments over disability and the complications of disability to be out-going again? Do you have any suggestions? I can understand that I need to restore familiarity with body language and learn to exhibit it again, and to express emotion openly, I know that I need to improve my communications skills over what they have been reduced to since then. I am very embarrassed to have these problems so I do not dare to ask or mention this sort of information normally but I want to improve now. Even information on what sorts of words to research to help would be useful.

    35. Re:Shut-ins by RsG · · Score: 1
      BTW, if any of you web hermits are listening, I truly apologize for "generalizing" and lumping you all into a group with the rest of us. I apologize for calling you a human being, but if my suspicions are correct, some of your hermit brethren have been doing a great job arguing that you guys are not in fact humans, with the same nature as the rest of us. So, since this conversation has degraded to this point, I'll just ask this question: what planet are you hermits from?
      That last part of your comment is illogical. You are arguing that saying "human beings don't need physical interaction" is the same as saying "I am not human, and do not need social interaction". This is a leap to a conclusion not supported by the facts of the argument.

      If someone were to argue that people don't need other people in the flesh (and I'm not sure if they're right or not), then they are not saying that they, the hermits, are in some way not human. What they're saying instead is that socializing is not a prerequisite of humanity.

      Physical interaction has been the norm for all of our history. You seem to be arguing that this in turn means it's a natural need, and therefor must be fulfilled. However, "natural" is a sticky, and somewhat meaningless, idea. Tribal warfare is also a natural human instinct, yet somehow I've managed to avoid killing my neighbours with a spear (though I won't deny that the thought is temping, especially when they share their bad taste in music at three in the morning).

      Can you actually show that people have an instinctive need for human company? As in, provide a solid arguement based on fact, or else link a psychological study (ideally one that's credible and scientifically sound). I'm inclined to think that the need for direct interaction is an aquired one, based partly on the variety I've seen in people's social behaviour and background. I don't have any reason to think that someone who dislikes most human contact outside of sex is unhealthy; in fact it's been my experience that the gregarious types are the ones with more problems.

      And even if there is an instinctive need for physical contact, what does that mean? That hermits are unnatural? So is just about every other aspect of our lives; human nature is poorly suited to the real world. Most of our instincts were made for an environment of migrating hunter-gatherers, and half of our laws exist for the express purpose of limiting instinctive behaviour. I hardly think that just because a need is "natural" it must therefor be good. If someone is capable of meeting their need for human interaction without physical contact, then what harm is there?
      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    36. Re:Shut-ins by shadowbearer · · Score: 1



        and the veneer gets thinner, and thinner.

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    37. Re:Shut-ins by mantar · · Score: 1

      First, I took the time to read through all of your post... I truly hope you do the same:

      However, "natural" is a sticky, and somewhat meaningless, idea.

      First of all, there is a difference between natural human behavior and those things that are a part of our human nature. Natural human behavior is quite subjective, isn't it? Human nature, on the otherhand, is not at all subjective... and while some people argue about what is part of our nature and what isn't, the fact remains that there are things that are a part of our nature that are not changed by external influences. For instance: it is part of our nature that we have a sense of self preservation. There are some that can ignore that part of their nature, but in doing so, it is in direct opposition to their nature as a human being, and I contend it requires an act of the will to do so.

      If I didn't explain myself well enough, here's another way of looking at it: human nature is the subset of human behavior that is common to all human beings. BTW, in all of my posts I have been talking about human nature, and not human behavior.

      Sticky? Absolutely. Having studied my fair share of psychology in college I understand the "stickiness" with abstractions that are sometimes made in this field. BTW, these abstractions are made in order to better explain human behavior.

      Meaningless? Absolutely not. If you find abstractions such as this meaningless, then you should stick to arguing about things which don't trouble you or stretch your mind too far.

      Tribal warfare is also a natural human instinct, yet somehow I've managed to avoid killing my neighbours with a spear (though I won't deny that the thought is temping, especially when they share their bad taste in music at three in the morning).

      Clever! I like your sense of wit... and especially your example. You made my point probably without even realizing it: the operative word here is "tribal". Hopefully I can hold your attention for the rest of this post... it will be long.

      Throughout history, mankind has tended to clump together into groups... to continue with your analogy, we'll call them tribes. The first thing that comes to mind when most people hear the word "tribe" is probably some half-dressed natives living in huts and painting pictures of animals on a rock wall. But in truth, "tribes" exist in areas that we would otherwise consider civilized and/or modern. The family unit can be considered a tribe. A group of friends with common interests and goals can be considered a tribe. Hell, even MySpace and other social networking sites can be considered tribes. Despite advances in technology, we still work to create tribes, to feel connected.

      Have you heard of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs? Abraham Maslow was a psychologist who wrote a paper in the 40's called A Theory of Human Motivation. Since then, it has become widely accepted by the scientific and psychological community. In it he proposed that there are 5 levels of needs that all human beings have, and that one becomes free to pursue the next level of needs after he/she has satisfied the needs of the lower levels. Here they are (starting from the most basic level of needs):

      BIOLOGICAL NEEDS
      * the need to breathe
      * the need for water
      * the need to eat
      * the need to dispose of bodily wastes
      * the need for sleep
      * the need to regulate body temperature

      SAFETY NEEDS
      * Security of employment
      * Security of revenues and resources
      * Physical security - safety from violence, delinquency, aggressions
      * Moral and physiological security
      * Familial security
      * Security of health

      BELONGING NEEDS (we can also call this one social needs... this level of needs is important to our conversation)
      * the need for friendship
      * the need for sexual intimacy
      * the need to have a family

      ESTEEM NEEDS
      * the

      --
      # man tar
    38. Re:Shut-ins by kfg · · Score: 1

      Do you have any suggestions?

      My suggestion is going to seem simplistic, yet in this case it really is the answer. Get over it. Refuse to accept your own embarrassement. It is nothing but a chain you forge yourself, binding you as slave to the master; you.

      You're a human being. You have life. Your life may not be "perfect," but you can take what you have and live the most with it.

      I know that I need to improve my communications skills over what they have been reduced to since then.

      How do you get to Carnegie Hall?

      All skills are simply a matter of practicing them. Use it or lose it, as they say. You have lost it. If you use it, you'll get it back. Yes, you'll suck at first, just as someone just learning the piano sucks at first. But with each repetition you get better.

      You can't relearn the skills in preperation to going out. You're going have to go out to regain the skills, because that's where the pracitice is.

      Here's a tip about learning any skill. Don't focus on the errors. That makes you error focused. Note the errors if there's something you can learn from them, but then let them go. Focus on the successes and rejoice in them. Strive to do that again (as opposed to trying not to do the errors again).

      When I take a new music student I can tell within a few lessons how they are going to progress; and it has little to with that thing we call "talent." Most view practice as a drudge, something they have to endure in order to be able to play "someday." Some of these people obviously have loads of "talent," but I know they're never really going to go anywhere and every step of the way is going to be painful, for them; and me. I'm hardly even there as a teacher, but more of a "motivator," just to keep them going. What I really need to achieve with them, before any real teaching can take place, is to convert them into the other kind of student.

      These people enjoy the learning, the process. Practice is playing, playing is practice. Developing skills is itself a joy and a goal unto itself. They enjoy the ride. They don't simply endure it in order to get to the destination. Some of these people obviously have little "talent," but they turn into players anyway. They can't help but turn into players.

      If you learn to enjoy the path the destination takes care of itself. Get out, meet people. The road will necessarily be rocky at first, but it will also necessarily get smoother as you go along.

      Have a nice trip. Start today.

      KFG

  8. My rights online? by el+americano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apparently I have the right to be a web hermit. Otherwise this wouldn't be YRO, right?

    --
    Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
  9. Great for the disabled/homebound by elgee · · Score: 1

    The Web in particular and the Internet in general is a great benefit to those who are homebound because of illness or disability.

  10. My Biography by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow, total story of my life!!!

    j/k

  11. whatever by kaoshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't use the internet. What a bunch of suckers.

    1. Re:whatever by Malnathor · · Score: 0

      Liar! Your low six digit slashdot ID betrays you.

    2. Re:whatever by Eternauta3k · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't use the internet. What a bunch of suckers
      Can you say that again? The last smoke signal was kinda blurry.
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  12. Just because you can... by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because you can do those things on the internet doesn't necessarily mean it's better to do them there. Humans, by nature, are social animals. There is only so much interaction a web page or an IM can provide.

    I mean, when was the last time someone gave you a hug through your monitor?

    1. Re:Just because you can... by Kesch · · Score: 4, Funny

      /hug

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:Just because you can... by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean, when was the last time someone gave you a hug through your monitor?

      *hug*

      -Stephen

    3. Re:Just because you can... by LordKazan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      (go ahead churchies, mark me flamebait for making negative remarks about your fairytail-of-choice)

      when engaging in that social activity means going down to the local establishment filled with a cloud of cancer causing toxins and engaging in an activity that kills braincells OR going to down your local brainwashing center (aka Church) and engaging in mass displays of superstitution and dogmaticism.

      I'll take a pass and monkey around on the net.

      However; no, I am not a web-hermit. My fiancee and I just went down to KC to see her favorite MLS team the Houstan Dynamo kick the K.C. Wizard's blue butts after we had been down there wednesday to see our local team (Des Moines Menace) play them in the open cup. We run, occasionally go camping, etc too. Definantly not a web hermit.

      "socialization" in this country is generally considered poisoning yourself (either physically at the bar, or mentally at church) - that's not socializing in my book, that's insanity. I'll take a pass.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    4. Re:Just because you can... by dknj · · Score: 1

      socialization does not mean go to bar and get pissy drunk while smoking death sticks. i socialize on a daily basis when i travel to work. hope the metro, sit down next to random person and strike up a random conversation. several of my gfs were found this way.. my last gf and i never even went to bars, but went to museums and such. of course this isn't limited just to women, going to a local restaurant and sitting at the bar* while i eat lunch allowed me to make new business contacts. or, the time a bigwig of Morgan Stanely needed a jumpstart allowed me to sit down with him for 30 minutes for a decent conversation.

      socialization means going out and meeting with new people. for most of the 20-some crowd, this generally means going to a bar and getting shitfaced and waking up next to a stranger. for the older and it means going outside and saying "HI NEIGHBOR". to the younger, it means going to your friend's house to play video games.

      and to stay ontopic, due to this insane heat i am being a complete web hermit today. after reading a funny k5 post, i decided to look at the w4m board on craigslist. the first post actually yielded an interesting chick to talk to. i will write a journal if i ever get coffee with this woman

      lets kill this thread here, please.

      *if you worry about a little second hand smoke (generally upscale restaurant bars aren't as smokey at lunch) then you need to reconsider that diet coke you're drinking.

    5. Re:Just because you can... by LordKazan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wasn't talking about the dictionary definition of the word, or even the educated person with-more-than-two-braincells definition of the word - i meant the Joe Sixpack (as much as I hate that term) meaning of the word.

      I don't drink diet pop, not only can I not pallet the artificial sweeteners but their breakdown products are toxic IIRC - I tend to drink normal pop as sugars are easily metabolized with exercise - and even then only at meals - between meals I tend to drink water

      as for "a little second hand smoke" have you not been paying attention to the toxicity of ETS? "a little second hand smoke" does a LOT of damage - the toxicity threshold of ETS is so low that any concentration can be considered toxic - a concentration strong enough to smell (not to mention even higher concentrations that you can see) is orders of magnitude above the toxicity threshold.

      Furthermore - drinking pop is something you voluntarily engage in. Being exposed to ETS is something I am FORCED to engage in - walking down the street, sitting in the privacy of my own home with the windows open, driving down the road, walking through a parking lot, walking into a non-smoking establishment, and a million other daily activities.

      request to kill thread denied. PK awarded to me for your attempt to manipulate the argument with false analogies

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    6. Re:Just because you can... by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      bingo - I know a guy who chews tobacco and he holds the same opinion of smoking as me. Watching him load up on chew just about makes me puke, but it only affects him medically so it's HIS BUSINESS even if I find it disgusting.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    7. Re:Just because you can... by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Because if a government study says so, it must be true. Just like those "studies" that show marijuana to be a gateway drug. If you think a little cigarette smoke is harmful, what do you do if you're outside when a big truck or bus drives by and belches out a big cloud of exhaust?

    8. Re:Just because you can... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      "if you worry about a little second hand smoke (generally upscale restaurant bars aren't as smokey at lunch) then you need to reconsider that diet coke you're drinking."

      Meh. I'm not worried due to my health; cigarette smoke is the worst smell I've yet encountered. I'd walk a quarter mile to avoid it. Skipping out on a room full of drunks is a small cost.

    9. Re:Just because you can... by dknj · · Score: 1

      Meh. I'm not worried due to my health; cigarette smoke is the worst smell I've yet encountered. I'd walk a quarter mile to avoid it. Skipping out on a room full of drunks is a small cost.

      you need to find restaurants that have better ventilation. sitting at the end of the bar where no one is smoking and sitting two booths over in the "non-smoking section" are practically the same. that said, all upscale restaurants i've been to actually have good ventilation (perhaps you should consider moving to a city where smoking is banned in public places).

      second off, what restaurant do you go to where there is a room full of drunks at lunch? especially since the whole getting drunk at lunch thing has been effectively killed since the 70s...

    10. Re:Just because you can... by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      and presumption gets you no where - most of the studies on ETS were not government funded. and marijuana isn't a gateway drug - but it should be illegal on the same basis that smoking tobacco should be illegal - or atleast illegal for consumption in a manner which creates an aerosol.

      What you do to your own body: i could care less, so long as you do it in a responsible manner and you are restricted from doing certain activities (driving for example) under the influence - oh and your employer can contracturally require you to not do them.

      Most of that big truck of bus's "Black cloud of exhaust" is carbon oxides (monoxide and dioxide) - greenhouse gases yes, carcinogens/toxicants? no - simple asyphixants (oxygen displacers, only harmful to human health in enclosed spaces at above normal concentrations).

      Internal Combustion Engine exhaust is not analogous to the byproducts of tobacco (or cannabis) combustion. Thank you for reiterating #1 on the top ten list of shitty arguments repeated by people who love to poison others with impunity. That being said - soon as we can replace hydrocarbon internal combustion engines with something cleaner it should be done.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    11. Re:Just because you can... by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      I mean, when was the last time someone gave you a hug through your monitor?
      ::Hugs JorDan Clock:: - There you go!

  13. reminds me off by scenestar · · Score: 5, Informative

    The japanese hikkomori syndrome. ( http://www.jref.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-909. html )

    When people start substituting real life with a digitall one it usually doesn't end to well.

    Humans are by nature social beings, if the "old" ways fail one starts to look for an alternative.

    Besides, real life interaction (think of sex ) will allways beat the "cyber" equivalent.

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:reminds me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "When people start substituting real life with a digitall one it usually doesn't end to well."

      I disagree. It depends on the person, who they are, and where they live. For me, it's quite the opposite. I get in more trouble when I do go out. I have and do substitute more and more my TV and internet time for so-called real life activities, because I find real life full of buffoons, incompetent asses, and authority abusers. And it's a bad cycle, because there ARE many good people out there; I know because of my life before I went this way, but less and less so because I think more and more people more like me are not going out but spending time on the internet or the like.

      I can interact with people. I find great enjoyment in interacting with good, intelligent people. Most people that I talk to actually like me (so I'm told). But, strange as it sounds, I have this extreme, near hate with interacting with people except my closest friends.

      Why? I almost always end up in trouble.

      Drive around? Get speeding tickets. You say don't speed, but I really don't. In Pennsylvania, USA, tickets are more like a tax given out for those 3rd shifters who have to get to work or those returning to the city. And law and magistrate system reflects that--the standard is guilty until proven innocent, no court recrods, not the other way around.

      Or gotta put up with same damn fool with road rage or driving your bumper. And being a loner by default, that puts you at risk--being a loner is considered "bad", and in an evidentiary based system, you are considered the evil party because, well, the other person has someone with them who bears false witness.

      Interact with family? My family is one of those families that appear nice, but are truly fucked up. Blames everyone else for their ills. I know when I'm wrong, but in my family, that makes me the one to blame since the one who does take responsibility is the only one and hence the one when something does go wrong is immediately blamed for, regardless of the actuality of the situation. It gets piled on.

      Go to the mall? Got screamed at, accused of groping (didn't), got walked over group when window shopping, etc.

      Go to movies? Yeah right. Well documented on /. I'll wait for the DVD, thank you.

      The other thing I do that I enjoy these days--food industry. Love restaurants, going out to eat. That's about it. Everything else is a damn chore, a task. I find more joy in doing laundry and watching CNBC then going out to the mall, movies, local bar, etc.

      People say humans are social individuals. That's true. But if you look at my real life interactions, and subtract out interactions that are beyond that of the business sense (ordering food while at a restaurant), I easily go months without talking to a human being in real life.

    2. Re:reminds me off by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      There's actually an interesting anime that just came out that is based around this hikkomori syndrome. The anime is called Welcome to the NHK and while the humor side of things (the hikkomori is part conspiracy nut) the show basically deals with the hikkomori's fairly realistic and common fantasy that a random girl will somehow show up at their doorstep (literally) and start solving their life's problems whether they want them to or not (hint: they want them to).

      Part of this is what I call "button-pushing syndrome" and for the most part only affects younger. I define this as someone who thinks all of lifes problems can be solved at the push of a button. Games like WoW and such definitely contribute to this (not that I think they're bad because of this) because progression is metered and living a fantastic life in a virtual world involves little more effort than hitting buttons.

      Of course, real life is much more difficult and takes a lot more hard work. Presented with a world where they can exist by pushing buttons (the net) and real life, these people's fight or flight mechanism kicks in and takes them down the path of least resistance...the net.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:reminds me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Besides, real life interaction (think of sex ) will allways beat the "cyber" equivalent."

      But this is Slashdot... How many actually have got a chance at the IRL version???

      Plus, you assume that you would get "good" sex. I think you assume too much.

    4. Re:reminds me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for another anime that deals with hikkikomori, see Rozen Maiden.

  14. Social Hermits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My cronjob web-based order to pizza hut should kick in within the hour. Automatic bill-pay for my bills, telecommute and direct deposit for work...but no, I'm not a friggin hermit. I'm running GAIM and posting to slashdot. I play games online once in a while...that's considered human interaction, right?

    If you want a web hermit, go stick a picture of Stallman with the relevance of ESR and you've got yourself your posterboy.

    Now if you can give me a dynamic World of Warcraft type immersive game where everyone else is AI, then maybe I'll be a hermit.

    1. Re:Social Hermits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got it. It's called Oblivion. "Want to hear a Khajiit joke?"

  15. Digital life is pure luxury by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article: "...we have to ask ourselves -- is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more? Is a life of doing things and meeting people as our primitive ancestors in the late 20th Century knew it becoming redundant?"

    Let's assume that a billion people on Earth have the money and time to be online regularly. (this is probably more than the real number) That leaves more than five billion without such a thing. There are significant percentages of people in rural parts of the world (from Africa to America and everywhere in between) who don't even have electricity, telephones, or real plumbing. And let's not even talk about food and medicine.

    The upshot? If you have the capacity for living most of your life online, and you can take all that real-life survival stuff for granted, you are enjoying a life of luxury. And the best part is that, online, you will almost never encounter those poor starving folks, so you can safely ignore their existence (just like you do on your way to Starbucks). Enjoy!

    Quick check: in terms of income, how do you rank globally?

    (Go ahead, mod me as a troll... I've got karma to burn.)

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by IflyRC · · Score: 2, Funny

      (just like you do on your way to Starbucks) I may be confused, but if I am on my way to Starbucks and ignoring people, how I am totally living my life online??

      I just think the statement is a little contradictory to the topic at hand. Shouldn't I be paying someone to go pick up my Starbucks for me since I am living a life of luxury and never want to go outside? I mean, if *I* have to go get my own Starbucks, obviously I'm not a hermit nor am I living a life of extreme luxury.

    2. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask and ye shall receive.

    3. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      If you can afford Starbucks (especially regularly), then on a global scale, you are living in extreme luxury.

      The "on your way to Starbucks" comment is drawn from the article, where the author refers to going to Starbucks to use the Internet access there.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    4. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      where the author refers to going to Starbucks to use the Internet access there. Can't be that luxurious if I can't afford internet at home :|

    5. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by ArmyOfFun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The average non shut-in American will probably never encounter a poor starving person either. Before the internet, most Americans were probably already finding out about poor starving people via mainstream media. An internet shut-in might have an extra layer of insulation against the poor starving masses, but most Amercians insulation was already complete.

      I'll counter that it's far easier to find out about and read about poor starving people than it was before the internet. It's also easier to research and donate to various charities. All the ones I know about and donate to readily accept credit card payments over the internet.

    6. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      The upshot? If you have the capacity for living most of your life online, and you can take all that real-life survival stuff for granted, you are enjoying a life of luxury. And the best part is that, online, you will almost never encounter those poor starving folks, so you can safely ignore their existence (just like you do on your way to Starbucks). Enjoy!

      Not only that, but anyone with a computer now completely outranks any person living in the entire history of the world up until a hundred years ago simply due to the advance of medical technology. In fact, many people in second and third world countries are better off than their ancestors becuase of the advance of science. It's unfortunate, but basically scientific progress only happens in relative luxery, further driving that luxury. So far, luxery has required an inequity of labor so that the poor of the world support luxery upon their backs, but with automation and better material sciences, this will eventually no longer be true. My belief is that it's better to allow the feedback of invention and automation to operate with few boundaries so that it progresses as quickly as possible. Every time an advance is made, a larger percentage of the world benefits from it. At some point, hopefully sooner than later, technological advances will improve everyone's life at once due to increasing interconnections between countries and societies.

      I don't feel bad for being among the richest 1% of humanity. It will give me more time to study mathematics, physics, computer science, and hopefully improve the world.

    7. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      Gee, does this account for cost of living too?

    8. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      in terms of income, how do you rank globally?
      Type in $1 as your annual salary Enjoy!
    9. Re:Digital life is pure luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upshot? If you have the capacity for living most of your life online, and you can take all that real-life survival stuff for granted, you are enjoying a life of luxury. And the best part is that, online, you will almost never encounter those poor starving folks, so you can safely ignore their existence (just like you do on your way to Starbucks). Enjoy!

      I think there was another post on this but luxury allows advancement. If it's all I can do to find food then I'm not going to be creating much of anything outside that arena.

      In other words, all that software that helps keep some hungry people fed wouldn't be there if everyone was starving. It is luxury that allows people to help others.

      By the way, most hunger is not caused by apathy. It's caused by the greed of a relatively few people (eg. corrupt governments, etc). The only real way to help most of the starving is to invade, kill the leaders, and take over their country. A complicated affair. How's that Iraq thing going?

  16. Evolve or Die! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the typical /. basement crawler is now an endangered species as web hermits take over the world? Inquiring minds want to know...

    1. Re:Evolve or Die! by justkarl · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that the typical /. basement crawler is now an endangered species as web hermits take over the world?

      You could say that...It's not like any of them are reproducing.

  17. Semi-hermit by kayakun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I confess, I'm a hermit. I'm probably one of the very few people who goes to college and spends all his time in his room. I'm not a full-hermit, though, since I do go out to buy groceries and things like that, but my social life is basically non-existent. I don't even have friends in college, and I have maybe a total of 5 people I talk to through IM. Being a hermit isn't that bad, but most importantly, it's my choice. Some people may prefer to hermit themselves due to social anxieties or phobias. At least the Internet makes hermitting more entertaining. The biggest draw-back is probably the lack of physical contact. I haven't received a hug in years. I don't miss talking out-loud much though. As a matter of fact, since I haven't talked in so long, when I talk out-loud my throat gets sore. Ouch.

    1. Re:Semi-hermit by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm having a hard time deciding whether to laugh at or cry for your post.

    2. Re:Semi-hermit by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Have a nice day!

      You have been trolled!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    3. Re:Semi-hermit by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit of a hermit too, I'm at uni aswell and don't really have any friends from my course. I really felt like a weird/wierd hermit the other day when I thought about the firends I had - I was struggling to name more than one who I didn't speak to exclusively online. Still, I suppose I live with my girlfriend so I kinda expect the whole contact with other people to drop away anyway...

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    4. Re:Semi-hermit by planetoid · · Score: 1

      lol I doubt the OP was trolling... I, too, pretty much fit that same description perfectly. And I don't care... I got my degree in computer science and I'm still not in a rush to get a job, despite my parents never shutting up about it. I'll get a job and a social life, when I feel like getting them.

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
    5. Re:Semi-hermit by ModemRat · · Score: 0

      During a year in college I had become a complete recluse. Snubbing acquaintances and avoiding "friends". Anyways, the moment I realized how bad it really did become was when I was trying to say "Thank you" to a cashier and nothing came out. My throat was sore and scratchy from hardly talking. *shakes head* Good times...good times.

    6. Re:Semi-hermit by GWBasic · · Score: 1
      College is one of the few times in life where it's very easy to meet people and make real friends. After college everyone is so into their own life that it's incredibly difficult to have a good social life.

      Seriously, now is your chance to make some real lifelong friends. Don't pass it up.

  18. You go do that by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, get it on with your bad web hermit self.
    I'm sure there's a lot of people out there who aspire to be a balding fattie eating delivery pizza every day and jacking it to internet pr0n. I hear guys like that drive the women wild.
    I consider it natural selection -- self removal from the gene-pool.
    Go Darwin go!

    1. Re:You go do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, go natural selection. It always seems to make the best decisions, right? I guess that's why trailer parks are chock full of kids and Newton and Leibniz both died childless. Our species peaked a few hundred years ago, it's all downhill from there.

    2. Re:You go do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was really rude and unnecessary.

    3. Re:You go do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to the trailer park argument, remember that those "balding fattie eating delivery pizza every day" folks are the only ones actually advancing civilization. Without them, the machines would break down, and the world would no longer be able to substain over 6 billion people. Once the technology falters, 5 billion would die in a decade. Then over a few more decades, the population of the world would drop to about 200,000 farmers and local traders. Famine and death during child birth would become common again. Eventually, natural selection will once again favor "balding fattie eating delivery pizza every day". Evolution can be cyclic.

    4. Re:You go do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm not bald (yet... early 30's), nor am I fat because I eat reasonably and exercise regularly (alone as much as possible because I don't like hanging around others that much, especially when I'm trying to get into the workout "zone"). But I do masturbate to Internet porn, that's true. And yet, I don't consider the alterntives very viable. Let's see... go hookup with a girl so I can fuck her and tell her to piss off when I want to play on the computer or read books? (because that's what I enjoy most in life) Yeah, that sounds like a recipe for a great relationship. Add the fact that the divorce rate in the USA is sky-high (and failed relationships much higher still) and you have a total disaster scenario.
      And why is it that people always get on our case for being loners anyway? I mean, I'm considerate of society and don't shit on people who prefer to hang out with people all the time. Why can't they return the favor? Maybe they're just really assholes? Maybe that's why it's better to be a loner?

  19. The answer: by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

    "Is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more?"

    Nope, nothing at all. Certainly not a job. Instead of real work, create a web site, post a witty article there, split it into 5 pages, each with about 40% ad content, some of that being flashy annoying banners.

    1. Re:The answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clicked on one of his banner ads just because you said that

  20. Not clear on the 'earning money online' bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I could get that angle down, I'd be there. I try to stay home as much as possible as it is (not getting pussy wether I leave or not, so why bother?).

  21. But I just got an internet... by guruevi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And I can't do all that with it. I can just enlarge some bodyparts with that internet. I think I'll have to add more tubes.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  22. if not real life, then real death by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    depression is more likely for people who don't get out much:

    and heart disease but other than that, no, you should be just fine without a real life, er, I mean without real life.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:if not real life, then real death by wiml · · Score: 1

      Or is it that not-getting-out-very-frequently is more common for people with depression? I've even seen studies that suggest a causal link from depression to heart disease.

    2. Re:if not real life, then real death by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      yep, the feedback loop there is positive only in the system engineering sense.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  23. Getting there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to go out all the time and I had a good amount of close friends. However over the past year I've been retreating more and more into my home. I leave my apt for necessary things like food and work but I never go out socially. I've lost touch with all my friends, I don't even know why I have a cell phone anymore. I don't know what happened to me. I know I have problems with depression and I take medication, but I guess the shit isn't working. Also my anxiety in social situations has increased alot and I guess I just avoid them in fear.

    It's a shitty way to live and it's not like I dont want to change it. But I feel like I'm stuck.

    1. Re:Getting there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put yourself in a situation where you have to interact with other people in a social way. Go for some beer with someone from work and complain about your boss. Stuff like that.

      One thing you can do is volunteer for work on a working ship. The cruise is always fun - seeing the ocean and such. The side benefit is that you are basically forced to interact with other people on the ship. There's lots to talk about (fog again! how 'bout them waves? what does this button do?), and the environment on ships is condusive to being chummy.

      In the end, though, it's up to you to force yourself to interact. It's hit-and-miss, but you're bound to meet someone who shares your outlook.

      Damn, I should be a therapist! :)

    2. Re:Getting there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take maybe $3000 and go on a trip to Asia or somewhere similer. Aside from adventure, its cheap, exotic food, exotic people. See what life is like somewhere else, you will be surprized and find that your life isn't so bad after all.

    3. Re:Getting there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, the old "I had the blues 'cause I had no shoes 'til I met on the street a man with no feet" kind of thing?

      If you are really trying to help, I apologize, but you really have no idea what you're talking about. I guess that the idea is to force them out of their isolation by seeing how unreasonable it is by seeing people in a different situation than themselves. It won't work. It's highly unlikely that a person that uncomfortable in social situations going out to do this. Do you really think that they'll fly thousands of miles to see a bunch of people that they neither know nor could communicate with even if they wanted to? What do you expect them to see? That the people are worse/better off than they are? They probably won't see it - at least in the way that you think.

      They will see the difference, absolutely. What they will also see is a bunch of people talking and interacting with each other in a way that they cannot share. Just like home. If you really want to make them more isolated than they already are, this is a sure way to do it.

      Isolation isn't something that you can just shock somebody out of.

    4. Re:Getting there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever looked into Schizoid Personality Disorder (or "Schizoid Personality Type" for those of us who like ourselves this way). You sound a lot like me, except I'm happy with the way I am. I'm just very unhappy with the way other people are.

  24. Luv, twu luv. by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Some lucky souls can live their lives, earn money, buy necessities and even find love on the Internet."

    Why, those lucky souls truly have everything in the palm of their hand.

    1. Re:Luv, twu luv. by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      and, after finding it within their grasp, they soon notice it's smeared across their keyboard.
      ick.

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
  25. Rehash by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

    Lame article.

    This was all covered a few years ago by an MSN contest that challenged a group of people to live in a house and get and do everything over the internet. It's been a while and it might have just been a long ad campaign but it was explored pretty fully back then.

    You could write the same article about the telephone - Some folks can work over a telephone, get entertainment over a telephone and order food over a telephone - big deal.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
  26. You might be a web hermit if... by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 4, Funny
    You might be a web hermit if...
    • You lock your self in your room to look at source code.
    • When your mom opens the door you yell "Mom, close the door! Your letting the demons out!"
    • Your hygene habits resemble that of a svelte Theodore Kaczynski.
    • When the power goes out, you immediately stop breathing.
    • Goths have stopped by your house and ask if they can hang around your room because it is dark and creapy.
    • You secretly write love letters to fictional anime characters.
    • You friends (if you have any) have started a chapter of the Secret Snake Club
    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  27. Question by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    Are you a hermit because your "digital lifestyle" makes it easy and comfortable? I guess what I'm asking is would you still be a hermit if the internet didn't exist?

    If you would choose to be a hermit no matter what, then the internet is simply providing more forms of socializing. But if you're only a hermit because of the comfort of the internet then it might be a problem.

    1. Re:Question by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is the internet any different to books and games? I'm like the guy above and before I got the internet I played my SNES on my own, before that I always played with toys on my own. That's just how some people are.

      If anyone a "digital lifestyle" will save lives because it stops people from killing themselvs when they get depressed and lonely.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:Question by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a "digital lifestyle" will save lives because it stops people from killing themselvs when they get depressed and lonely.

      That sounds logical but in my experience it's not true. A person who is depressed and lonely is still depressed and lonely while playing a video game. He's just temporarily entertained which keeps his mind of off it. But the underlying problem still persists.

      Online socializing, however, does seem to help at least a little. As long as there is interaction with other human beings in some form. It's simply a human need.

    3. Re:Question by kayakun · · Score: 1

      To answer your question, I think I would still be a hermit. Since I was little, my parents always had me around adults, so I had to entertain myself or die of boredom. Eventually, I got very used to entertaining myself (no pervertedness intended) using my imagination and creativity to make things, like drawings or lego structures. The computer is just another tool to help me make things. I don't have the money to have a wood or metal shop, but I do have enough to get the hardware for a PC, and all the software required is free (linux and compilers). The Internet is just icing on the cake, allowing me to see what's going on in the rest of the world and keep up to date on things that interest me. I'm happy with the way I am.

  28. Reminds me of a Sci-fi book I read once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't remember the name of the book; I read it some time in the 1960s probably. It foretold a world where there would be very little interpersonal interaction. People would return to their windowless apartments at the end of the day and find all their needs met. The author thought of everything. Smoking was a fire hazard so if you wanted to smoke, there was a tube that came out of the wall to provide cigarette smoke. If you wanted sex, you could have a completely real feeling experience with any movie star of your choice. Naturally, people became completely disconnected from each other and (IIRC) it all ended badly.

    I was quite young when I read the book and wonder what I would think of it now. If anyone can tell me what it was called I would be most grateful. Thanks.

    Anyway, people have been thinking about something like the internet hermit for a long time and I don't think many authors thought it was a very good idea. 1984 was quite a stark warning of how the state could use modern technology to subvert democracy by controlling people's minds. In that regard, as long as the state does not control the internet, the internet hermits might be better off than the mass of zombies who get their news from Fox. Hmm. Put me down as undecided.

    1. Re:Reminds me of a Sci-fi book I read once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. (if it isn't, then that book is extremely similar in character)

  29. hmmm by mseidl · · Score: 1

    Believe me! Sunlight is good!

    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm albino, you insensitive clod!!!

  30. Gambling's too unreliable, ebay sucks because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..it inolves leaving the house to buy merchandise and to ship crap. So, my question to you lot is; what other ways are there to make a living off of staying at home if you're not a web developer, that is.

    1. Re:Gambling's too unreliable, ebay sucks because by elwin_windleaf · · Score: 1

      ...what other ways are there to make a living off of staying at home if you're not a web developer, that is.

      Quite simple; become a web developer, my friend.

  31. Actually i am one of those by unity100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I do everything except the very frequent things (bread buying etc) from the net.

    'Net' is our country, we are its citizens. We are the 'Net'.

    As an added bonus, i can opt to go out and 'socialize' in the old fashioned way, in the manner and time i choose.

    Isnt it fantastic ?

  32. You have to log off eventually by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    The ultimate limit on your online time is when you get bedsores on your ass.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:You have to log off eventually by Saint+Ego · · Score: 1

      Is that what those are? Excellent! I was afraid it was VD!

      --
      Reality is prettier inside my head...
    2. Re:You have to log off eventually by FreakinSyco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had to get up and walk around the room after reading that.

    3. Re:You have to log off eventually by RsG · · Score: 1
      Is that what those are? Excellent! I was afraid it was VD!
      You do know that to get VD, you have to actually have sex first, right? Moreover, what kind of VD were you expecting to find on your ass?

      No, on second thought, don't answer that. I'm not sure I want to find out. :-P
      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  33. Friends? by zaphod_es · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have an imaginary friend, doesn't even matter if my internet it down :)

  34. The Cage? by XanC · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like the pilot of Star Trek (TOS of course).

  35. As Sandra Bullock demonstrated.... by arcite · · Score: 5, Funny
    in THE NET: Angela Bennett is a computer expert. This young and beautiful analyst is never far from a computer and modem. The only activity she has outside of computers is visiting her mother. A friend, whom she's only spoken to over the net and phone, Dale Hessman, sent her a program with a weird glitch for her to de-bug. That night, he left to meet her and was killed in a plane crash. Angela discovers secret information on the disk she has received only hours before she leaves for vacation. Her life then turns into a nightmare, her records are erased from existence and she is given a new identity, one with a police record. She struggles to find out why this has happened and who has it in for her.

    Moral of the story? If you are a modern day hermit, atleast take the time to introduce yourself to the pizza man incase your stalkers find you out and erase your IDENTITY.

    Alternatively, when being chased by phychopaths who want your data, remember to back it up on a trusty floppy disk. NOTHING can hurt those!

    Alternatively, always choose Macintosh, the only laptop that effieciently upload viruses to alien space crafts and save the planet.

    Alternatively, if you are as hot as Sandra Bullock and are also a modern day hermit, I would like you to have my ICQ#, I'm here to help ANY WAY I CAN.

  36. Being Alone is underrated.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    One thing I've always thought...having 'alone time' is often underrated. I dunno if it is because I was raised and only child..but, I've always been used to having the ability to shut the door, and be alone. I really value alone time. Hell...I've had girlfriends in the past that I really loved, but, after about 3 days of close confinement with them, it was bascially "Hon I love you, but you gotta get the fuck out for a bit..." They are hard to meet, but, there are some chicks out there that feel the same way....those are the best.

    I hate people that are just smother you, wanting to hang on you all the time...but, I guess it just is some people's nature to be one way or the other.

    I've actually never understood people who just HAVE to be around other people...or they get lonely. I've seen it with guys...like they HAVE to be married, or they don't function right...never understood that. I've seen friends come out of bad marriages...and they just cannot seem to have fun being single...going home alone at night at times just seems to really bother them I guess. They'd be single for a bit, and get right back into marriage, often in bad ones again, they were so desperate to not be alone, they'd jump on the first piece of trim they hit and get married.....

    I prefer the single life...because at some point...they or myself...goes HOME.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you my ex?
      im from a large family. alone time you get when theres no one else in the same room. you just relate better to being around people. im learning to appreciate it now, but i didnt get it until after the breakup unfortunately

    2. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I used to think like you and prefer to be alone. I hated dating.

      However my gf is clingy but in a same way. MEaning she loves chatting with me and having me involved but loves to give me privacy when I need it. I learned to appreciate it more and being alone works only so long as it can cause depression. A gf will make sure you get your ass out of bed on your days off of work.

    3. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by drsquare · · Score: 0
      I've actually never understood people who just HAVE to be around other people...or they get lonely. I've seen it with guys...like they HAVE to be married, or they don't function right...never understood that. I've seen friends come out of bad marriages...and they just cannot seem to have fun being single...going home alone at night at times just seems to really bother them I guess. They'd be single for a bit, and get right back into marriage, often in bad ones again, they were so desperate to not be alone, they'd jump on the first piece of trim they hit and get married.....


      It's called 'being sociable'.
    4. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      Nah those people have a unique social psychology term. Mainly those who go thru serial marriages.

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
    5. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      Definitly true. Another thing that our society really undervalues is silence. It's kind of interesting to watch how crazy people go after a couple of seconds of silence.

    6. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It's called 'being sociable'"

      No...I don't think so. I can be VERY sociable when I want to. I go out either with friends, or if they're not available...I will strike up conversations with strangers, and have a great time...I meet new friends quite often. But, when I don't feel like that....I don't want anyone around.

      You CAN be both ways....I like to have people around when i want to be around people, but, I like to live alone so that when I want to be alone, no one bothers me.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I used to think like you and prefer to be alone. I hated dating....gf will make sure you get your ass out of bed on your days off of work..."

      I like having multiple girl friends...that way I don't get tired of just one that hangs around. I have a few in different states, I love them to death, and we have a good time when either I fly there or they fly here to hang with me awhile. I've just met very few women I can say I could actually live with in the same house...

      And I dunno...I've never needed someone to 'get me out of bed' on my day off. Ok, occasionally I'm very hungover and at that point, I'd not want anyone nagging me to get outta bed, but, I generally don't have that problem. My weekends are usually full of plans. I like to get out and wash my car...go boating or crabbing with friends..I love to cook so I hit farmer's mkts, and shop the specials to figure out what I'm gonna cook. I like to go out for fine dining in restaurants...play with my computers..and always have some new gadget or toy I'm wanting to play with.

      So...I guess it depends on your personality. I can find more to do than I have time to do it. As I've gotten older, and "lost" friends to marriage along the way, it has gotten a little lonely, in that in the past I used to have at least 10 names and numbers I could call, and have a gang of people around me to go do stuff...and maybe I'm starting to get to an age where I could 'settle down' a bit...but, I'm not actively looking for a perm. mate. If I found a woman I could spend time with in close confinement, one that was as independentaly minded as I...had HER own set of friends, appreciated time apart, time alone, and time off with friends, and could trust each other to do so...well, then, yes...I might could settle down.

      But, all of that, and have her look hot...kind of hard to get that all in one package...

      ps. She also needs to be set up in her own career...and hopefully make near as much money as I do...or more. I want one that is financially independent...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Being Alone is underrated.... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Mine definitely has plans of her own and has her own set of dreams and makes more money than I do. We both love school and getting different degrees for things so that works out but they are in different area's.

      I do agree with some insecure women who want to do everything with you. For example my former boss had a gf who obsessed with watching TV with him and would not do it without him. I personally wanted to shoot her. :-)

      I avoid those kinds of women so its not a problem. She has her own life and just likes to have fun with me.

  37. Count me in! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a hermit, haven't been out the house in over a year except to the field across the road from me and to the hospital in an ambulance.

    I don't really like people very much, they're noisey and too active for my tastes. I like things quiet and peaceful, if I must talk I'd rather talk with my fingers in a text basis than with vocal words.

    I don't really feel I'm missing out on anything, as a kid I was very social, but then I don't have to deal with the huge bunch of idiots screaming and shouting.

    We live in an era where everyone seems to want to be equal, we forget some people are just quirky and have no intrest in social activites. Some of us don't want to be a pop star, a footballer or whatelse is popular these days. We're happy to sit in the corner, do our own thing and just wish to be left alone unless we approach you.

    I don't think I have a problem, I don't need you going "OH LOL YOU FREAK! YOU NEVER GO OUT!". All I need is for people to understand that they arn't the centre of the world and that people have different feelings and levels of social activity.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Count me in! by kayakun · · Score: 1

      I feel ya. People definitely need to understand that "normal" doesn't exist... it simply refers to the preference of the majority. Just because you deviate from "normal" doesn't mean something is wrong.

  38. Is it really all that bad? by hellfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, the title "web hermit" brought forth images of a guy 80 lbs over (or under!) weight, hairy beard, and beer cans around his desk top computer doing nothing but surfing.

    Pure FUD. Oohhhhh, feel fear/pity/shame for the weirdo who spends all day at the computer! It's a stigma, as the article says, and it's become more and more acceptable, as the article says. That's because using the web makes sense. Hell if you work from home all day, why not have your groceries delivered? Accepting a delivery takes 10 seconds while going to the store could take an hour. That's one more hour to make money working, or kill farm mephisto in Diablo 2 five more times and hope he drops that's unique you've been looking for, thus achieving a little more happiness than the fool next door who barely understands a computer.

    The whole point of the web is more freedom, independence and opportunity. People are taking advantage of this. No one said everyone online is creating a bomb shelter with a fiber link or that once you surf the web for 4 hours you become Agoraphobic. The article doesn't even have any good facts or figures. Who says you aren't going out to meet people? Who says you aren't socializing with neighbors? Who says you aren't exercising 3 three times a week? The only fact the article states is that more and more people are using the web to get the things they need, and it suddenly jumps to the conclusion that everyone who does this is a "web hermit."

    And most importantly, no one said you aren't bangin' your girlfriend every 4 hours because you work from home and have plenty of time for impromtu sex! Who cares if you found your gf in a bar or two states away playing the same online game as you. If you like her, and she likes you, and you have a healthy sexual compatibility (provided she moves in with you - this is important), then fuck the world. You are most definitely still in the gene pool.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  39. parenthood, work, suburbia by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    College and grad school were great for socializing in person. There were people all around me who were interested in intellectual things, and it was even pretty easy to find people who were interested in the same intellectual things I was interested in. We were at the same stage in our lives, and although it seemed like we were working our butts off in school, the truth was that we had a lot of free time, because we didn't have kids, or pets, or lawns to mow.

    The real world is a whole different deal. Nothing against my neighbors, they're nice people and I enjoy shooting the breeze with them now and then, but we just have nothing in common. Parenthood, work, and living in suburbia just aren't very conducive to making contact with people who care about books, or jazz, or free information.

    Internet relationships tend to be shallow and temporary, but if I didn't have e-mail, usenet, and (I admit) slashdot, my opportunities to have any kind of an intellectual life outside my own head would be extremely limited.

    My family and I just spent three weeks in Greece and England, and it was an amazing contrast with the kind of alienating suburban environment I live in here in the U.S. In Athens, extended families go out together for dinner in sidewalk cafes at 10 in the evening. In little farming villages in Greece, the older men hang out in coffee shops and talk. In England, people hang out and talk in pubs. The U.S. is just pathetic, especially where I live (Orange County, CA), in terms of giving people spaces where they can interact with the rest of society. Everybody just drives places in their air-conditioned SUV's. Maybe shopping malls are the closest equivalent we have, but I just don't enjoy them as places to hang out, people-watch, or run into friends.

    1. Re:parenthood, work, suburbia by tylerh · · Score: 1

      I, too, live in the OC with a career, wife, kids,and a suburban tract home.

      My advice: move to Irvine, and either join a church [*] or club.

      Why, just last night, my wife and I were finishing walking our dog when one of our neighbors was having tea on his front porch with another of our neighbors. So we dropped my. (the fresh blueberries were delicious). I filled in my neighbors on the details of fourth neighbor whose mother had just died of a heart attack, so we took up a collection to send flowers to the funeral.

      So either :

      (1) the Suburbs are isolating, anti-intellectual hell, or
      (2) you've forgotten what your mama should have taught you: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

      [*] If you're looking for a group that enjoys intellectual challenge but aren't too religious themselves, I recommend the Unitarians of Mission Viejo (http://www.tapestryuu.org/ ). They have a lot of UCI people who are warmly accepting of atheists, pagans, skeptics, and others whom most churches want to "convert."

      --
      "one treats others with courtesy not because they are gentlemen or gentlewomen, but because you are" --G. Henrichs
    2. Re:parenthood, work, suburbia by drew · · Score: 2
      The U.S. is just pathetic, especially where I live (Orange County, CA), in terms of giving people spaces where they can interact with the rest of society. Everybody just drives places in their air-conditioned SUV's. Maybe shopping malls are the closest equivalent we have, but I just don't enjoy them as places to hang out, people-watch, or run into friends.


      The spaces are still there, but most suburbanites have conditioned themselves not to notice them. I'm not sure how it happened, but it's true. I lived in Southern California for several years, and I would bet you that if you go check out any local city park next Sunday and it will be crawling with people hanging out with their extended families, just like you would see in Greece and many other parts of Europe... But there won't be any white suburbanites there.
      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  40. mods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why has this been modded +5 funny?

  41. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly enough, this was initially published to Slashdot fifty years ago, with the headline:
      Phil Hartup on bit-tech.net has captured the Zeitgeist of the phone-aware generation: The Age of the Phone Hermit describes how some lucky souls can live their lives, earn money, buy necessities and even find love over the telephone. 'Is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more?'; not me!"

  42. actual net hermit by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recall near the begining of the dot.com a guy who was going to spend a whole year in a house living off of stuff ordered from the net. He legally changed his name to DotComGuy. He was going to make living via selling advertising and webcam feeds. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dotcomguy http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,40940,00. html

  43. Asimov's story by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I am trying to remember the exact title (googling doent help because Isaac wrote hundreds of stories). But the story was about planet of people who lived mostly alone on plantations run by robots. They would communicate with each other constantly by immersive television, but almost never met in person. (I wondered what they did for physical romance?). I recall the plot conflict was about solving a murder of one of these recluses.

    1. Re:Asimov's story by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 1

      Another, similar story is "The Machine Stops" by E.M. Forster.

      --
      ...but is it art?
  44. Not without merit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

    I've lived in places that make the Internet seem like a great place to spend one's life. A town in South Central Missouri comes to mind, where people believe the earth is 6000 years old, George Bush is a great American president, and soon the immigrants are gonna outnumber the humans. Unfortunately, these people seem to have followed me onto the Internet. You can find them at any right-wing website. Oh, well, I've since moved back to downtown Chicago where those same immigrants are considered friends, the Earth may have been made by a god of your choosing, but it has nothing to do with the truth of evolution and George Bush is a great American turd. Finally, back among the human race. But I don't blame those Missourans, many of them count the livestock amidst their family trees.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  45. MMORPG addict's response: by scoser · · Score: 1

    "But I'm too low level to survive in the Real Life instance!"

  46. Shooting yourself in the foot by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    Those that cannot communicate (verbally) will never go very far in the real world. Only so many jobs exist that you dont need to effectively talk to people. If you are in college and living like this, stop ASAP. Go to bars, go to parties (yes there are many parties that are not just a drunkfest). Get involved in something otherwise you might as well get used to the lifestyle including the budget size of a college student.

    The number one problem with people in IT, they cannot talk to non IT people. Ever wonder why the person that has very few uber l33t skills is pulling down 90K a year and the top knotch programmers are now having trouble cracking 40K

    College is never just about studying, that probably comprises less than half of what college teaches you. Social interaction of all kinds will shape your personality to be able to communicate with others in the real world.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    1. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a middle of the road programmer, less then 2 year experience and I make $80k. Our top paid engineer makes over $150k. I don't know where you are getting your numbers.

    2. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A median salary for a fresh-out-of-school CS grad in a developing is around $50k. I'm an example; I finished in the middle of my graduating class and I had a choice of jobs between $45k-55k upon graduation. It can increase quite rapidly.

      Top programmers (team lead, architects, etc) make 6 figures; though much of what they do is direct other programmers (ie human interaction), so there is truth in what you say, while the numbers aren't as extreme as what you claim.

    3. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Ever wonder why the person that has very few uber l33t skills is pulling down 90K a year and the top knotch programmers are now having trouble cracking 40K

      If you are a hermit, 40k is probably enough, especially if you don't have to live in California.

    4. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > yes there are many parties that are not just a drunkfest

      Yeah. We have a special name for them too "Boring".

    5. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break this to you, but the median income for an extravert is not $90k. That is to say that one could go to parties, kill brain cells, engage in embarrassing and idiotic behavior, and end up earning $23k anyway. People in the higher echelons of business or finance are an insignificant percentage of the population, as are all people earning 90k+. What you'll see is that there are certain urban areas where the median income is higher--and also the cost of living is higher--and that is where you will more readily find people earning $100k+ for software engineering jobs. For example my salary is $85k. What percentile do you think that is?

      I can talk to non-IT people. I have a network of friends consisting of people from academia, engineers from a variety of industries, and a few researchers for pharmaceutical companies. I can even communicate with the poseurs on Slashdot that are basically ignorant, and if they even work in the technology industry are glorified server mechanics and database interfacers. Meaning that they really have as little in common with me as the overweight American Idol-watching alcohol-drinking sports-watching know-nothings that I simply have no interest in communicating with because their lives are insipid. Talking to them is trivial, it's simply grueling. Their social lives revolve around things other people do, whether it be celebrities or gossip about coworkers, family members, or friends. They're attention-starved bores unable to entertain themselves and thus seek to congregate to discuss things that don't matter. They also have no money, no contacts, and about as much upward mobility as a janitor. So they aren't winning out on much by being so vapid.

    6. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Count yourself lucky, in many areas not only are people having to settle for CS jobs that are in the 20K range, the rest are simply unable to find a job.

      Many of my friends are just graduating and some graduated in december and still havent found a job that pays anything reasonable. They have been turning down jobs because they found that Menards pays much more. The market is saturated here with CS graduates.

      Chicago has sounded like it is better, but I personally would never want to live there unless I was making atleast 120K a year because the cost of living is just so insane.

      Outside of Chicago, the midwest has been traditionally the last to have a bubble, and the first for it to burst. So we basically do not get the extremes very often.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    7. Re:Shooting yourself in the foot by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Congrats?

      I think you are probably doing them a favor by not talking to them...your personality is somewhat lacking "I am better than you..."

      You might just want to get used to the concept that a significant portion of your life is based on things that are immaterial.

      They are winning on one thing...they are happy...without having to "prove" their superiority.

      BTW, you made some really bad generalizations about the general population, which just goes to prove you are out of touch with, well everyone.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  47. I wish I hadn't by bec1948 · · Score: 1

    I wish I hadn't used all my modpoints. What a ripe opportunity. This is serious stuff. Here I am at almost 7PM, watching the news on TV, and I'm wasting my time at Slashdot! Damn.

  48. Stupid People = Extroverts by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, I just came to the realization that I've never met a stupid introvert. Every stupid person that I've ever met was extroverted, and usually extremely so.

    1. Re:Stupid People = Extroverts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if an introvert was stupid, how would you tell? You can tell when an extrovert is stupid because they regularly publicly demonstrate the fact. If an introvert doesn't appear stupid it could be because they aren't, or because they simply don't give away much about themselves. This doesn't say as much about the intellectual capacities of introverts and extroverts as it does about the definitally true properties of introverts and extroverts. Sure, you may claim that there are loads of stupid extroverts about, but ask yourself: are there more of them, or are they just louder?

    2. Re:Stupid People = Extroverts by linvir · · Score: 0

      What a thoroughly shitty idea. The only thing you can conclude from your "data" is that extroverted people express their stupidity more clearly, whereas introverted people, being introverted and all, don't give themselves away as readily.

    3. Re:Stupid People = Extroverts by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Continuous babble about who ones second cousin's best friend is sleeping with and what one's friend's friend got for benefits in their job and who *they* are sleeping with is pretty tough to deal with when you don't have the faintest damned clue who the hell those people are. ;-)

        I'm not even going to touch the conversations based on lobotomy box programs. Shake.

        Most introverts generally keep mouths shut, because spilling thoughts can be and often is construed as either insult, libel, unpatriotic speech, or some other similarly stupid label. Or fawning ("sucking up") which can a be much worse thing.

        Even most stupid introverts know it's just plain better to zip lip ATPIT. Freedom is infinitely preferable to being Labeled.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Stupid People = Extroverts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't meet the stupid introverts because they stay in all the time.

      Slashdot and Digg should be evidence enough that stupid introverts exist.

    5. Re:Stupid People = Extroverts by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      IMO, "Introvert" doesn't mean someone who's simply quiet or shy. It means someone who draws fulfillment from solitude. You know, someone who doesn't /need/ to go out and do things with others to prove their humanity to themselves.

      Extroverted people /need/ to be around others in order to feel complete. This doesn't mean they're automatically stupid or intending to be obnoxious, they're just tending to their needs. However, it does seem like most people that are unintelligent are constantly looking to others for reassurance that they aren't, or they seek strength in numbers.

      Likewise, you can be fairly gregarious and still be an introvert. It's all in what makes you happy.

  49. 1960's televised play by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    I remember a 1960's era play about a family working from home, on terminals, and never having to go anywhere, and how it affected life. I believe it was on NET (National Educational Television), a predecessor of PBS. Anybody else remember this? Perhaps a reference?

  50. metamodding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is why I have taken to metamoding all Redundant mods as Unfair.

  51. They've got that too by WhitePanther5000 · · Score: 1

    It's called Fu-Fme

  52. Got over hermit phase by getting on the ballot. by bmasel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since June 1 I've been collectinfg the signatures necessary to Get on the Ballot as a candidate for the United States Senate, challengeing the clueless incumbent Herb Kohl in the Democratic Primary.

    As of today, it's official, my 2198 signatures are sufficient.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
  53. Napoleon Dynamite? by RKBA · · Score: 1

    How about a 2004 movie called "Napoleon Dynamite"?

  54. Can you get BJ via high speed? by jt2377 · · Score: 0

    i want BJ via high speed internet connection!

  55. You can socialize without alcohol by walnutmon · · Score: 1

    I find going out and socializing while not drunk is not as painful as it seems. The problem is that when you are out, surrounded by people, it is natural to feel a lot of social stress, this stress is actually rooted to instincts that we have developed thousands of years ago when social failure meant an end to your family tree. It was very serious back then.

    Now when you go out to the bars, you really still can feel that social stress, and there are several ways to aleviate it, the most popular being alcohol. However, simply fighting that stress and interacting with others does the trick too. It's like jumping off a diving board, once you do it a few times it loses it's not as scary and becomes very natural.

    I really think that our society has lost many of it's social skills, and that is somewhat sad to me.

    --
    You take it, I don't want it...
  56. Bad plan by Bishop · · Score: 1

    That sort of trip will just increase the sense of isolation and the depression. Unless you are an extrovert travelling by yourself is not fun.

  57. Hermit creedo by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I for one don't welcome anybody, overlord or not. Go away!

  58. Real life by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    Is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more?

    Fresh air.

    Oh, wait, the air's probably fresher indoors these days.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  59. You can't... by zobier · · Score: 1
    Is there anything that we really need good old fashioned Real Life for any more?
    You can't go bushwalking in your mum's basement.
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  60. Is this a mirror? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    That's odd, I don't remember posting that.

    Also, my handle is wrong.

    I better report this problem.

  61. Mod parent funny ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hats off for that one. I nearly spat coffee all over my keyboard.

  62. Hermits != internet addicts by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

    Hermits, by nature, are anti-social beings. And they have always been so.

    They make a clear choice to live outside of society. In the past they had to support their basic needs by hunting, fishing, agriculture... or perhaps even trade their 'deviner-abilities' with a few commoners (for food or money). Now they have the option to earn their living through the internet.

    The article however describes a totally different kind of person (one who lives in the parental basement and such). Though there is some truth in the fact that there probably is a kind of hermit that lives through the use of the internet, without being addicted to it, and without trying to substitute his real life.

    Albeit that people that medidate alot, another possible hermit habbit, tend to use that as a real life substitution.

  63. Dangerous Drinking Habits by vain+gloria · · Score: 1
    The Internet cannot get you drunk. I should know, I've tried.

    Tip: Don't swallow everything you find on the internet.
  64. The problem with that is... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...every time I meet a woman from the Internet in person, she looks less like Sandra Bullock and more like Jim J. Bullock.

  65. ROADTRIP FOR FUN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you get bored being an internet hermit - take a road trip to the beach, the mountains, the state parks, Las Vegas - whatever.

    Earth is a Big Place - actually getting in you car (or a bus, or an airplane) and going someplace different is a very healthy thing to do.

    Take 3 vacation days, bump them up on a weekend, and take a 5 day break - longer if you can manage it.

    Learn a trick from the retired folks, visit all 50 states if your in the USA, or visit all of Europe if you live there, etc...

    If you can find someone to go with you on your vacation, that's ok,
    but the Freedom you have when you travel to different places is fun too.

    Oh, and leave the laptop behind, just take your camera and swim trunks/skis/phat-loot/surf board/hiking boots/bicycle/skateboard with you.

    It's Summer time!

    Go Out And Play!

    NOW!

  66. Re. What by Dokterdok · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, pussy gets you.

    (sorry I just had to say it once in my .. web hermit life)

  67. A Counterexample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound pretty introverted.

    1. Re:A Counterexample by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      ah, the internet, where everyone is a badass

  68. Real life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can lead a real life on second life if I want.
    http://secondlife.com/

  69. Ruarke is a douche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.