Slashdot Mirror


AOL Digs Up Yard for Spam Gold

Registered Coward v2 writes "AOL is planning to dig in a MA couple's yard looking for buried gold and platinum owned by a spammer they successfully sued for spamming AOL. AOL said Tuesday it intends to search for gold and platinum bars the company suspects are hidden near the home of Davis Wolfgang Hawke's parents on two acres in Medfield, Massachusetts. The family said it will fight in court to oppose AOL's plans."

230 comments

  1. obligatory.... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    23473437 Gold
    23473437 Platinum
    23473437 Me too!!!!11!!!one!!
    23473437 Gold Rush
    23473437 Pirates
    23473437 Pirates -Caribbean
    23473437 Plunder
    23473437 Spam
    23473437 Spam Gold
    23473437 how to stop spam
    23473437 gold in Mrs Wolfgang Hawkes' backyard
    23473437 gold in Mrs Wolfgang Hawkes' frontyard
    23473437 gold in Mrs Wolfgang Hawkes' land
    23473437 gold in Medfield fields
    23473437 court fight
    23473437 lawyers
    23473437 lawyers -sco
    23473437 how to kill your wife
    23473437 how to kill customers
    23473437 poop

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:obligatory.... by stinerman · · Score: 2, Funny

      You missed "steak and cheese". :-)

    2. Re:obligatory.... by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Funny

      23473437 Pirates -Caribbean

      Haha, as if AOL users would be savvy enough to use the NOT operator. You had me going up to that point!

    3. Re:obligatory.... by MoxFulder · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Friend,

      I know this letter may come as a surprise to you, but I am in desperate need and have heard that you can be trusted in these matters. I am Mrs. Susan Johnson Hawke, mother of Davis Wolfgang Hawke, who has been wrongly accused of spamming by the tyrannical United States government in concert with the scheming Internet giant, America Online.

      A few months ago, sensing that the authorities were preparing to imprison him, my son Davis concealed a cache of precious metal bars on our rural Massachussetts property. He made me promise not to reveal their location to anyone except in case of greatest emergency.

      Now, the health of my son Davis is in great danger. Prison authorities will not pay for his care, and demand that I do so. His h3@lth is bad and he is unable to 5.A.T.1.5.F.Y his lovers all night long with his man h00d... he desperately needs V1@grA and CailIs sofTabs. He is also gaining weight and absolutely needs some fat-burning Hoodia, now for low-price and risk-free for only $29.95.

      Will you help me save my son??? I have dug up the metal bars from our land, but tragically they have been transformed from their original lustrous gold and platinum sheen, to a dull-gray color. I need to purchase a large quantity of special chemicals in order to transform the sticken ingots and restore them to their original condition, so that I may sell them and get the money I desperately need to help my son Davis Hawke.

      If you can provide me with sufficient funds to purchase these chemicals, I will gladly reward you with 20% of the value of the gold and platinum bars once they have been sold. Please contact me if you are willing to do this, as it is a very urgent matter.

      Blessedly,
      Mrs. Susan Johnson Hawke

    4. Re:obligatory.... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that your son was the former prime minister of Nigeria.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:obligatory.... by usquared · · Score: 1

      Pirates? Savvy? Harharharharhar!

    6. Re:obligatory.... by Asm-Coder · · Score: 1

      as well as money for a shovel.

    7. Re:obligatory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because the Senator from Illinois is so well spoken.

  2. Nothing to hide? by eddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know this will sound like a stupid "If you've got nothing to hide...", but really, if there weren't anything hidden out there, and AOL could be made sure to fix any damage the do (grass, trees, etc).. why would you fight this? Wouldn't it simply be AMUSING to watch them flail blindly?

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're totally right. Hell, a couple months ago, my wife was bothering me: "We need a new barn! It's falling apart, for Darwins sake!" I kept telling her that we don't have the money for a new barn. Then it hit me: Tip off the FBI that Hoffa is buried under it.

      My, how they came in droves. Destroyed the barn, including the foundation. And now, they're rebuilding it at tax payer expensive.

    2. Re:Nothing to hide? by Devv · · Score: 1

      You know, they might have problems eating their dinner in the garden. The upside is the kids might get some rela Tonka-toys.

      --
      +1 Agree -1 Disagree
    3. Re:Nothing to hide? by Peden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps but their private property is none of AOL's business, having something to hide or not.
      For all we know, Jimmy Hoffa could be buried there :)

    4. Re:Nothing to hide? by whoppers · · Score: 1

      I doubt they're going to dig, they're only making a point to other potential spammers - "we're going to make your life hell as well if you spam".

      It may not be right, but spammers are only bending the laws for their own personal gain and our laws just aren't tough enough. Hell, overall they're not tough enough, we're letting way too many criminals off easy. Let's go back to a hand, a foot and your first born for an eye. Next time you'll think twice about committing crime.

    5. Re:Nothing to hide? by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      Probably because it's a hassle. Imagine waking each morning to the sound of a backhoe chewing through your well-manicured lawn. That's not something I'd want to hear for a couple weeks. Additionally, even if AOL replaces what they tear up, looking at Hydroseed on a big flat plot of dirt isn't quite as nice as the grass or other plants that used to be there.

      And finally there's a consideration of the land having some environmental value such as being part wetland or home to wild grasses (this is all, of course speculation because TFA didn't say anything about it). At best, I could see AOL getting a warrant or equivalent to use metal detectors to sweep the land before being allowed to puruse any more drastic measures.

      In the end, it's not amusing in the slightest for Hawke's parents and AOL's digging certainly infringes on their right to privacy. It would be no different if the guy buried gold and platinum bars in someone else's property (even if he did it illegally). It's not like they're looking for a body in a murder investigation - it's literally a treasure hunt, and I doubt very much AOL's right to dig is protected by law.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    6. Re:Nothing to hide? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Simple ground radar imaging should be able to pinpoint where to dig (if anywhere), so little (if any) damage would be done.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Nothing to hide? by 15Bit · · Score: 5, Insightful
      For some people reparations are not enough. If you put a lot of effort into your garden and it gets bulldozered, then no amount of fixing is going to make it the same. Some plants take years to mature, and a nice, flat, moss-free lawn can take a lifetime. For many a garden is a labour of love, not just a quick trip to the garden centre.

      And using heavy machinery does seem a bit like overkill. If the guy did bury his ill-gotten gains there, then he did it with a spade. Surely an old fashioned metal detector would do the trick, and failing that one of those clever underground scanners the archeologists use.

    8. Re:Nothing to hide? by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AOL could be made sure to fix any damage the do (grass, trees, etc)..

      Have you ever tried to "fix" a tree with a bulldozer?

      KFG

    9. Re:Nothing to hide? by StringBlade · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Let's go back to a hand, a foot and your first born for an eye. Next time you'll think twice about committing crime.

      In that case, you'd need a much more stringet set of requirements for the burden of proof lest you end up with a society of one handed, one footed, one eyed people, many of whom were falsely accused and convicted.

      If you want to spur more violence and civil unrest all you need to do is overreact in an excessively violent manner. A perfect example of this is Israel and Lebanon. Understandably Israel was angered by the murder of their (three?) soldiers, but bombing Lebanon back to the stone age in retaliation was a bit on the "way overboard" side in terms of justice. And because of it did Lebanon and Hezbollah stop doing what they were doing? Of course not - it just escalated.

      I'm not saying violence is never justified, but excessive violence is never justified. Would you lop off appendages for jaywalking, or just for murder? What about white-collar crimes like Ken Lay and Enron?

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    10. Re:Nothing to hide? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      You're a real killjoy. Looking for buried gold with radar is just missing the spirit of the exercise entirely. Ok so is a digger. They should have people out there with shovels.

      --
      Deleted
    11. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shhh. quiet. You might get bob_robertson's attention and he may respond about 'taking money from me at gunpoint' and/or any other libertarian mumbo-jumbo. *me ducks* ;)

    12. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What about white-collar crimes like Ken Lay and Enron?"

      Lop 'em off at said collar!

    13. Re:Nothing to hide? by xarak · · Score: 1

      and your first born for an eye

      This is slashdot, not somewhere where people who reproduce go, you insensitive clod!
      :)

      --
      Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
    14. Re:Nothing to hide? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I present some interesting quotes on the subject for the uninitiated (uninitiated to Robert Heinlein's stance on militarism, that is). I like the one about cutting a baby's head off in chapter 5 and the one about "violence never solves anything" in chapter 1.

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Starship_Troopers

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    15. Re:Nothing to hide? by robbiedo · · Score: 0

      Can you say," Al Capone's Vault?" They can get Geraldo Rivera out their on a live telecast for Time Warner, and make a feature length movie called "Gold in the Grass!"

    16. Re:Nothing to hide? by sanyam_y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I first thought that this posting was a spoof only to check that it is real. This shows how low can AOL get. After sacking half of its workforce it wants to dig backyards. Is it not digging its own graveyard...?

    17. Re:Nothing to hide? by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      I expect that AOL will find the kind of riches one could only find in Capone's vault.

    18. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Then it hit me: Tip off the FBI that Hoffa is buried under it.

      And you could have rebuilt the barn yourself for what it cost to get bailed out for the false statements to the FBI.

    19. Re:Nothing to hide? by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ok so is a digger. They should have people out there with shovels.

      Well if they use a potato fork, AOL could be the most lucrative Gold Farmers in history.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    20. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoffa is his pet hamster.

    21. Re:Nothing to hide? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You were making a perfectly good point until you brought Israel and Lebanon into it. Now everyone will feel compelled to give their own stupid opinions on the stupid war which ended two days and 42 minutes ago with a cease fire.

    22. Re:Nothing to hide? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "Some plants take years to mature, and a nice, flat, moss-free lawn can take a lifetime"

      And on top of that, the result would be "a garden somebody else made", which has a very different feel to "our garden that we made".

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    23. Re:Nothing to hide? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      It's not like they're looking for a body in a murder investigation
      Well Murder is a crime, spamming is a crime so we're talking about quantitative not qualitative differences here. If the plunder was buried with permission, then the parents accessories before and after the fact; if it was without permission at the least they are inocently in possesion of stolen property. I wouldn't expect the courts to be to protective of Hawke's rights as he didn't even respect the court enough to attend his own trial. AOL does have a feduciary responsibility to it's shareholder to be aggressive in recovering it's stolen assets; think they could lay-off half their work force then say "we're not going to tear up the nice Lady's garden looking for millions of dollars in precious metals that belong to us"

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    24. Re:Nothing to hide? by jeillah · · Score: 1

      "I'm not saying violence is never justified, but excessive violence is never justified. Would you lop off appendages for jaywalking, or just for murder? What about white-collar crimes like Ken Lay and Enron?"

      I have just the body part im mind for Ken Lay and all of the other crooked CEO bastards!!!

    25. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You deserve to be cockpunched. Why fight it? Do you even have to ask? AOL wants to bring in bulldozers and geological teams. This search could take months. Bulldozers are an eyesore and loud. All damage will certainly not be fixed and how long will it take fix the damage? What if a bulldozer accidentally damages a tree; how do they fix that? Plant another tree? In my eyes, that issue wouldn't be considered fix until the tree is as large as the damaged tree. That would take many many years.

    26. Re:Nothing to hide? by spun · · Score: 1

      Too true. You can kill a tree with a bulldozer without even touching it. You can damage the roots enough just by compacting the soil driving around near the tree.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    27. Re:Nothing to hide? by tilde.d · · Score: 1

      Nature can't be put back the way it was if they are going to use the means Mrs. Hawkes describes was in the letter (i.e. Bulldozers). If I had some land, especially if it was already landscaped they way I wanted it, I would be horribly upset if some large corporation came in and said they wanted to dig it up. Also, I didn't see anything in the article pointing to evidence that the bars are buried at the parents home. They only have proof he bought them. They have no right to demand excavation rights. They have no right on the parents' land at all. Show me reasonable evidence that it's been buried there and I may change my mind.

    28. Re:Nothing to hide? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I can see the article that will be published 6 months from now...

      "After months of intense excavating, all that was found was the corpse of Jimmy Hoffa holding O.J.'s Heisman trophy."

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    29. Re:Nothing to hide? by Zenaku · · Score: 1
      Heh heh, that reminds me of something that happened to my grandfather. Before he retired, he was a school principle in a relatively rural area. Decades after he worked at a particular school, someone rediscovered a safe that hadn't been opened in years, it was presumably in use until some time after he left, but not long after, and the people at the school figured there might be something valuable or interesting in it, and he was the only one that might remember the combination. He insisted that there was no way he could still remember the combination, but they kept asking him to come out there, thinking he might remember if he just put his fingers on the dial. He didn't.

      Finally, the school broke down and just hired someone to break open the safe (not a trivial expense for a rural school district). Inside were a couple dozen "Admit One" type paper tickets.

      I guess people just like to believe the world is full of treasure.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    30. Re:Nothing to hide? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I first thought that this posting was a spoof only to check that it is real. This shows how low can AOL get. After sacking half of its workforce it wants to dig backyards. Is it not digging its own graveyard...?

      How low can they get? How far can you dig with a backhoe?

      This is really quite simple: assuming they have reason to believe that the gold is buried there, and the gold is owed to them as the means to settle a judgement, then it is very much their legal right to recover that property.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Nothing to hide? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      And using heavy machinery does seem a bit like overkill. If the guy did bury his ill-gotten gains there, then he did it with a spade. Surely an old fashioned metal detector would do the trick, and failing that one of those clever underground scanners the archeologists use.

      If there's sufficient reason to believe that his parents are complicit in the caching of the ill-gotten gains, then I think they should bulldoze the house, too.

      Otherwise, you're right; they should be doing imaging, not digging indiscriminately.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:Nothing to hide? by mofag · · Score: 0

      Personally I like the idea of digging up spammers' gardens and hassling them in any other way that can be imagined no matter how petty. In fact the pettier (more petty?) the better! Bravo AOL! (OMG what am I saying?!?) I need to go lie down...

    33. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once staying in a hotel and got a strange urge to look on top of the air conditioning duct running through the closet and found a 20 year old porno mag. So there *is* hidden treasure out there.

    34. Re:Nothing to hide? by Lactoso · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could get together with this guy and bury a couple of tons of AOL disks around their property before the backhoes get there...

    35. Re:Nothing to hide? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      If the guy did bury his ill-gotten gains there, then he did it with a spade

      That seems like a completely ungrounded assumption.

      If I'm gonna bury millions of dollars worth of precious metals, I'm gonna do it right, for fuck's sake! It's not like I couldn't afford to!

      one of those clever underground scanners the archeologists use.

      Now you're talkin'. Mythbusters demonstrated the technology necessary to do this.

      Of course, it's rather obvious that none of us have RTFA, as a few of the questions raised in this thread have been answered:
      AOL said Tuesday it intends to search for gold and platinum bars the company suspects are hidden... (which of course may very well entail imaging *before* digging)

      "I don't care if they dig up the entire yard. They're just going to make fools of themselves,"

    36. Re:Nothing to hide? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      hah! (posted with bonuses to draw attention to AC, not self)

    37. Re:Nothing to hide? by JW.Axelsen.Sr. · · Score: 1
      I know this will sound like a stupid "If you've got nothing to hide...", but really, if there weren't anything hidden out there, and AOL could be made sure to fix any damage the do (grass, trees, etc).. why would you fight this? Wouldn't it simply be AMUSING to watch them flail blindly?

      you are obviously NOT a homeowner. i spend a decent amount of money and time on making the yard around my house look nice. if i woke up one morning and saw a bunch of dickheads running around in my back yard wearing tri-tip hats with the aol logo on them, i'd have to turn the hose on them and knock those silly hats off and tell them to get the fuck out of here or i'd call their parents. of course, if they'd be willing to put down a 30,000 dollar deposit BEFOREHAND, i'd say go for it, pirate-ships for life...but for some reason, i don't think aol would offer to do anything like that.
    38. Re:Nothing to hide? by The+Snowman · · Score: 1
      I was once staying in a hotel and got a strange urge to look on top of the air conditioning duct running through the closet and found a 20 year old porno mag. So there *is* hidden treasure out there.

      Depending on when exactly you found this 20 year old porno, I'm thinking of women from the 1980s or 1970s. I wouldn't call women from either era "hidden treasure." Come on, think of the hairdos!

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    39. Re:Nothing to hide? by Fizzog · · Score: 1

      "I have just the body part im mind for Ken Lay and all of the other crooked CEO bastards!!!"

      We could have an auction - I need a new tobacco pouch!

    40. Re:Nothing to hide? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Several times. I'm going to keep trying til I get it right.

      --
      meh
    41. Re:Nothing to hide? by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      No we're talking about the difference between a criminal case and a civil case -- they are very different. As either the article or someone else stated - it's probably not worth AOL's time and money to go searching for buried treasure, They simply want to prevent Hawke from getting to it and living off of it.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    42. Re:Nothing to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how mention of controversial subjects are considered flamebait especially when the poster did not say anything particularly inflammatory about the conflict besides the facts of the matter (Isreal retaliated with bombs for the kidnapping and ransom (and murder?) of some soldiers).

      I can see the offtopic mods, but I guess flamebait is the new favorite tag for anything we don't like to hear about. As such, this post will go ignored or be modded flamebait.

    43. Re:Nothing to hide? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Well let's say it's an alleged crime that has caused damages to multiple levels of victims, one of which has sued the alleged perpetrater of the crime for civil damages and has won a default judgement and is seeking hidden assets it belives are in the posestion of the perpetraters parents posibley without their knowlege. If the assets are found you can bet the attorney general will be thinking millions of dollars in assets left, millions of spam emails sen, criminal penalties of $500.00 per Email, we gotta get this Hawke guy before the next election.

      Besides, I'll bet the AOL will do this just for the show to make an example of them.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    44. Re:Nothing to hide? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Robert Heinlein's stance on militarism
      What, "it's good"?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  3. Wait... by Klaidas · · Score: 1

    Why would AOL dig the yard seaching for treasure? Couln't they just request to pay money for the damage?

    1. Re:Wait... by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      Hawke couldn't cough up the money...

      AOL : "All your gold belong to us..."

    2. Re:Wait... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      So?

      Take away all income and possessions until the debt is paid.
      He now either has the choice of living in povery until he dies or digging up the gold/platinum himself and hoping to reclaim some sort of live afterwards.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Wait... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Informative
      From TFA:
      AOL won a $12.8 million judgment last year in U.S. District Court in Virginia against Hawke but has been unable to contact Hawke to collect any of the money he was ordered to pay.
      ...
      Greenbaum said she has not talked with her son in more than a year and complained about the embarrassment and humiliation he brought to the family.
      "We don't know where is he," she said. "We certainly wouldn't allow him to put any gold on our property."
      In other words, he can't be found, and this is a civil, not criminal matter, so even if he were found in another country, extradition doesn't apply.
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Wait... by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Take away all income and possessions until the debt is paid.

      Someone didn't read the article. His income was from spamming and the only siezable possessions are a used cop car (whereabouts unknown) and . . .

      . . .gold and platinum bars, because. . .

      He now either has the choice of living in povery. . .

      He has already made that choice. For some reason he just likes the idea of living in poverty with gold and platinum buried somewhere. Makes him feel comfy or something just knowing it's there while he's eating cold Kraft macaroni and cheese in the back seat of his used cop car, down by the Connecticut River.

      KFG

    5. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would AOL dig the yard seaching for treasure? Couln't they just request to pay money for the damage?

      Because the spammer is a scumbag who makes a mockery of the law by having no identifiable assets. You know the sort: he'll hire the most expensive lawyers money can buy to claim he is penniless.

    6. Re:Wait... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Take away all income and possessions until the debt is paid. He now either has the choice of living in povery until he dies or digging up the gold/platinum himself

      RTFA. AOL wants to search the spammer's PARENT's property for gold they allege he buried there. He's long gone, no known property to seize.

    7. Re:Wait... by Don_dumb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because, as TFA stated, Davis Wolfgang Hawke did not turn up at the trial and cannot be found (at least by AOL), but they do have reciepts that he had purchased gold at the time, they believe in order to survive litigation more effectively.

      As much as I hate the spammer, I have to credit him that he was bright enough to know how to commit a lucrative crime. People who work average pay jobs but start profiting from fraud or theft, often expose themselves as they start turning up to work in Ferraris and buying big new houses, they just shout to the world "I am making too much money somehow". Patiently buying gold is a smart way to work, you just have to know when to quit so you can spend your cash, away from the scene of the crime. I guess DWH has done just this.

      Personally, I can see the logic in hunting in the parents garden, as it seems he was living there when he was aquiring the gold. But isn't it more likely he has just taken them wherever he has gone?

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    8. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is the American way.

    9. Re:Wait... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      But isn't it more likely he has just taken them wherever he has gone?

      Perhaps, but gold isn't that portable. The value is somewhere between $500-$1000 per ounce, so at best, if he spent that $12million on gold, then he'd have to lug 750 pound of the stuff around with him. Not dsure I'd want to store that in a beat up old car.

    10. Re:Wait... by webweave · · Score: 1

      He was smart enough to buy gold and metals but he had so much cash he had to make bigger purchases which are recorded. You and I could go to coin dealers and buy a few coins and bullion every few days and hide them in our yards with no clues left behind but if you have millions you are going to leave some kind of trail somewhere.

      I believe the "buried in the yard" story was just a cover set up by a smart man. Smart enough to buy gold in the first place, and smart enough to leave a phony cover story. Sure I support capital punishment for spammers such as him, I've even suggested cruel and evil punishments would be fitting for spammers but this story is starting to have a DB Cooper feel to it.

      It makes an interesting story but I still would like to see a spammers fate closer to the final scenes of Frankenstein where the towns people carrying pitchforks and torches swarm his house and kill him in some really horrible fashion. I think I'm better what that than to think he's bought some tropical island and is enjoying himself.

    11. Re:Wait... by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Just a theory...

      If AOL has copies of receipts for large quantities of gold and other precious metals he bought, wouldn't the receipt have a "Deliver to:" Address? :)

      Maybe that's why a judge gave the okay to dig here. It would also make the parent's claim of innocence seem a bit insincere.

      Of course, that's just a theory. Since he was living out of his car and owns no real estate, maybe he was having Fedex deliver it to his car, and spamming billions of emails using a WiFi connection from his laptop at a Starbucks.

      Of course, that's just a theory.

      I wonder if the NSA's call detail record database has any calls made to the parent's house from another country? Too bad nobody can access them, isn't it?

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    12. Re:Wait... by webweave · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely there was a deliver to address as I'm sure he picked them up (I can't imagine an armored truck pulling up to a beat up car in a parking lot, but it is a very funny image).

      What is likely is that he used his parents address, Not only for ID when signing for large cash transfers, (That's what a bank would require if the gold was worth over $10,000 per transaction) AND also for ID for his drivers license, Passport, credit cards, bank accounts.

      Show a judge enough records with the spammer using his parents address and none of any other address and I don't think you would have too much trouble getting your warrant.

      To test your first theory all you would have needed is to be at or to contact someone who was at the hearing, this would be good evidence to present.

      Another funny one ArtStone, the NSA taps. If he was smart enough to make and hide millions of dollars using computers then I'm sure he was smart enough to use phones that are not easily taped. Only honest people and dumb criminals have to worry about NSA taping.

      How he lived and the mechanics of how he spammed are less relevant as he was found guilty, too bad it's only a civil charge but he was guilty just the same. Now he's on the lamb. A fugitive hunted by Sheriffs, warrant officers, bounty hunters and the FBI. I can just imagine how all these agencies are pooling efforts in an attempt to rein in our perp. I'll exclude bounty hunters as if AOL really wanted to find him they could just spread a little money around this group and he would be found. I'll use the finding of Bin Laden as an example of what our government agencies/politicians are good for.

  4. Why not just use shovels? by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "She said AOL's lawyer notified the family that the company intends to use bulldozers and geological teams to hunt for gold and platinum on their property."

    I think it's a little bit of an overkill. If the article is true, the man just used shovels to hide the gold. Sounds like the ol' Gold Rush to me.

    "AOL said it will try to accommodate Hawke's parents by not being too obtrusive."

    lol

    1. Re:Why not just use shovels? by z0idberg · · Score: 4, Funny

      > "AOL said it will try to accommodate Hawke's parents by not being too obtrusive."

      Now that's what I call an abundance of sensitivity!

    2. Re:Why not just use shovels? by Don_dumb · · Score: 1
      Sounds like the ol' Gold Rush to me"There's gold in them there nettles"
      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    3. Re:Why not just use shovels? by Ghost+Hedgehog · · Score: 1

      Bulldozers just give a better effect, it adds more drama. Hoppefully the idea of that when you do not have any may on the bank, you must have burried it somewhere, dies quickly.

  5. Spammers vs AOL by triorph · · Score: 5, Funny

    man i don't know who to side against on this one, can't we rework this article to be like "innocent spam victim plans to take money back from evil spammer" or "AOL sues internet worker and destroys lawn looking for gold" man when the media isn't making it clear of what my opinion should be they're obviously not doing their job right

    1. Re:Spammers vs AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having their lawn ruined will teach them to rear spammers.....

    2. Re:Spammers vs AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think AOL could also be considered a spammer, so spammers are worse than everything, except AOL.

      there, simple. :)

  6. Oh Come On....... by segedunum · · Score: 1

    Does the date on that page say April 1st? This has got to be the best non-April 1st April Fool's story I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Oh Come On....... by setantae · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking.

  7. Oh well by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Greenbaum said her husband and father intend to challenge AOL's plans to dig on the family's property and search the family's 3,000-square-foot home. She said AOL's lawyer notified the family that the company intends to use bulldozers and geological teams to hunt for gold and platinum on their property.

    AOL said it will try to accommodate Hawke's parents by not being too obtrusive.

    As if bulldozers weren't obtrusive when they're tearing up your yard?

    Is it possible for AOL to do anything even more stupid? Are they trying to set a record for stuipd things in a month? Never have the mighty fallen so far.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Oh well by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are they trying to set a record for stuipd things in a month?

      Well, the RIAA sued a dead person. Being number two I guess they feel they have to try harder.

      KFG

    2. Re:Oh well by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      Perhaps AOL are just commisioning this project to demonstrate capability and win the contract to issue sopenas for the RIAA.

    3. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible for AOL to do anything even more stupid?

      You are missing the point. AOL is going to destroy a spammer's parent's garden.
      The spammer's parents are guilty of not killing the spammer as soon as they
      realized they had created one. For their heinous act of negligence, the very least
      punishment is the tearing up of their garden.

      AOL is brilliant.

  8. X marks the spot by spooky+ghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And even if AOL lose they've marked the spot with a big X. There are going to be plenty of people believing that there is gold hidden on the property and they'll all be sneaking around and digging holes hoping to get a piece of the treasure. It'll be worse than an invasion of moles (or whatever the local burrowing creatures are.)

    --

    No matter what it looks like, there isn't a .sig here.
    1. Re:X marks the spot by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      It'll be worse than an invasion of moles (or whatever the local burrowing creatures are.)

      I believe the burrowing creatures you refer to are known as lawyers.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:X marks the spot by artson · · Score: 1
      "And even if AOL lose they've marked the spot with a big X."

      Yes, they did, didn't they? AOL has nice deep pockets which makes them pretty vulnerable to a suit for damages. Wouldn't it be fun to be the lawyer arguing for the parents' right to damages for the obvious damage AOL has done to their property, now and in the future?

      Oh boy!

      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
    3. Re:X marks the spot by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Well assumedly they'd get a court order allowing them to dig, which is a pretty good defense. Plus, I'm not sure AOL is very worried. Although the deep pockets make them a target, it also makes them tough to sue unless you also have an abundance of resources. How long do you think an average person would last in court against AOL's laywers? They'd just outspend you, if they really wanted to.

      Plus I doubt AOL would do the digging themselves; if they get a court order, they'll probably have the searching done by teams of "recovery experts" who can demonstrate in court that whatever method they choose to use to search is the best-and-only way to do it, etc., etc.

      In other words, they'd have to be monumentally stupid not to CYA, and although AOL has never been exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, public-relations-wise, I don't think that their laywers are that stupid. They do, after all, cover people's asses for a living.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:X marks the spot by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      In that case though couldn't the family just get the kind of lawyer that is only paid if you win? Granted your not going get as much from the lawsuit.

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
    5. Re:X marks the spot by FractalZone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And even if AOL lose they've marked the spot with a big X. There are going to be plenty of people believing that there is gold hidden on the property and they'll all be sneaking around and digging holes hoping to get a piece of the treasure. It'll be worse than an invasion of moles (or whatever the local burrowing creatures are.)

      AOL would be smart to enlist the few remaining people who are stupid enough to pay for AOHell services, by offering the gullible fools a chance to *S*T*R*I*K*E *G*O*L*D* !!! .
      [insert typically flashy AOL marketing letter here]

      Anyone dumb enough to be an AOL subscriber is almost certainly going to be eager to buy another year's susbcription to win a chance to dig ALL THE GOLD A PERSON CAN CARRY out of some spammer's backyard. No gold need actually be buried there...

      As much as I loathe AOL, I despise spammers. I can't think of any more fitting punishment for a spammer than to have hordes of AOLusers digging up his family's yard.

      --
      "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
    6. Re:X marks the spot by artson · · Score: 1

      The family wouldn't be suing for the damage done by whomever AOL got to do the digging; rather they would be suing for damages done to their safety and property by the quite possibly unfounded accusation that there was a treasure buried on their property.

      Mere mention of such a thing would bring out every nut in the boonies. The principle is that if your actions place someone else at hazard - you are responsible. "You" being the corporate you of course.

      It isn't a large point, but I was interested because AOL sponsors the Open Directory Project that I support and edit for; and they are also a part of Time-Warner. As every Slashdotter takes T-W's evil and malignance as an article of faith with their morning cheerios........

      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
  9. Yarrr.... by Kazymyr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shiver me timbers! Mateys, now on to digging for the hidden pirate's treasure!

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:Yarrr.... by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Funny

      But Ben Gunn moved it years ago!

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:Yarrr.... by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Aww, they shoulda just waited until September 19th....

      http://www.talklikeapirate.com/

  10. Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by hagrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... isn't there a way that they could use a helicopter equipped with metal detection devices to determine if anything is buried on the property without actually digging? (I'm pretty sure I saw this on a Law & Order: Criminal Intent once).

    I would assume that a non-intrusive "search" of the property would at least be a middle ground between the two sides.

    1. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      No - that was on Law and Order: Bad Science.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Isn't that another name for CSI?

    3. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Inverse square law. Electromagnetic induction. Look 'em up.

      -Peter

    4. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by hublan · · Score: 1

      There's a difference?

      --
      My spoon is too big.
    5. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      I can see the use of a metal detector, but whats the helicopter for?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    6. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by Ubi_NL · · Score: 1

      Was that the same show where thay take security camera footage and "enhance" it to show the crystal clear picture of something that once was only one pixel?

      Maybe that gives you a clue on theit other techniques

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    7. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by x2A · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      To lift you far enough away from the earths magnetic core which would otherwise skew the results due to the third law of earth-magneto-skewerige... quickly, look over there, behind you!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    8. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      To make me look cool.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Besides they have to find the gold and platinum bullion by the end of the show!

    10. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Ground survey techniques, of which there are many types, are far more precise, cheap, and most are almost entirely non-destructive. They usually consist of a hand-carried or wheeled antenna placed on the ground surface, with a differential GPS system for positioning (or you can lay out a manual grid). The whole thing is usually carried in a backpack or a wheelbarrow-like cart, sometimes on an ATV if it is larger, and with a laptop/palm-size computer to control it. Two acres? It would probably take a few days to survey it carefully with the right equipment (I suspect the electrical conductivity survey techniques would probably work best for this sort of thing, or maybe ground penetrating radar -- it would depend a little on the local soil/bedrock conditions). There is a pretty good article at Wikipedia on archaeological uses. The forensic techniques aren't much different.

      2. An aerial survey from a helicopter would be too high off the ground to get any hint of an anomaly unless it was a @#$@#$ huge stash of bars -- like, the size of a car -- or the helicopter was flying so low to the ground that the wash from the blades would be both a hazard to others and a safety concern (e.g., debris getting into the engines). Precise positioning would also be a challenge. It isn't necessary to go to such expense or danger.

      3. You take TV way too seriously :-)

    11. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by Formica · · Score: 1

      Actually magnetic induction decreases with the cube of the distance, not square.
      See Metal Detectors for Humanitarian Demining: from Basic Principles to Modern Tools and Advanced Developments, and search for "cube" in the text, or some of these search hits

      Arjuana34

    12. Re:Unless TV Has Lied to Me ... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Best reply I've ever gotten! Thanks, man!

      -Peter

  11. Sounds liek the RIAA again by 91degrees · · Score: 1, Troll

    No matter how irritating spam is, does it really deserve such extreme aggressive measures to punish the guilty?

    Perhaps those who agree with this are also the ones who agree that the RIAA are right to sue file sharers, but if not, isn't there a certain amount of hypocrisy here?

    1. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . .does it really deserve such extreme aggressive measures to punish the guilty?

      Maybe, maybe not, but then they aren't punishing the guilty. They're punishing the guilty's parents without any real probable cause for believing the bars are actually on the property.

      The parents claim that they're buried in the White Mountains somewhere not only sounds reasonable, but probable.

      Oh, hey! I've got relatives in North Conway I can stay with. Hands off Washington, Jefferson and Monroe people. I claim them. They're mine! Mine! All mine! I'm a greedy little miser.

      KFG

    2. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Gwala · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No matter how irritating spam is, does it really deserve such extreme aggressive measures to punish the guilty?

      In a word, yes.

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
    3. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I take it you're also of the same opinion about file sharers then.

      Piracy must be fought by all legal means possible. Pirates cause losses on an immense scale; all the time lost by artists having missing sales. All the bandwidth, processing power on routers, etc. Pirates are thieves of the worst kind;

      In addition they write virusses to harvest email adresses. They operate large zombie networks to attack companies who try to fight spam. They try to hack every webserver to use as a spamhost. They're far more than just a nuisance, they're like the plague, and should be stopped at all cost. I rate them worse than drug dealers. Drug dealers at least see the people whom they destroy. Spammers are all the more despicable, thinking they can pull all this crap totaly anonymous. So yeah, let AOL do EVERYTHING they can to collect the millions the spammer illegally made. Go AOL, GO!

      Yeah. So you don't like virus writers.... Viruses are criminal damage. Why not prosecute for that?

    4. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well according to the article the guy made $600,000 a month from illegal activities. So that makes him a big-time crook, and it seems reasonable for AOL to try to get the $12.8 million which they were awarded. I think most people on Slashdot would have some understanding for the RIAA's position if they were going after someone who was illegally producing CDs and making half a million from selling those every month.

      Now that the parents of the culprit should have to suffer, is a different matter. They might be entirely innocent and really have no connection to the money. Then again AOL may be right with their suspicions. I hope the judge will come to a fair decision.

    5. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "No matter how irritating spam is, does it really deserve such extreme aggressive measures to punish the guilty?"

      Considering that spamming made the spammer enough money to get platinum and gold ingots to begin with, I'd say "yes."

      If the money was made illicitly, why should the spammer be allowed to hold on to it and hide it from the victims?

      "Perhaps those who agree with this are also the ones who agree that the RIAA are right to sue file sharers,"

      How much money do P2P users get for uploading MP3s? Where's the platinum?

    6. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The fact that he made money simply shows that he was offering a service that people were willing to pay for. Why does this have any bearing on the loss someone else has? If I'm given $1 to destroy your property, would you be entitled only to $1 compensation from me?

    7. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material is wrong, but the filesharers are kind of like the homeless street orphan pickpocketing the passed-out drunk leader of the hi-way men only to have the hi-way gang burn the village to punish the pick-pocket.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I suspect the IRS is very interested in this as well, they may look at the parent's assets and income to see if the two seem reasonable or might indicate unreported income.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Personally, i think that if you can dig up a spammer's lawn in retaliation, then you can dig up an RIAA executive's lawn as well. While you're there, you can fill the hole back in with all of those cassettes and CD's of Menudo, NKOTB, and whatever other corporate-pop they've foisted on us over the years and are now claiming that people are stealing with their computers.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    10. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I'm suggesting the RIAA should be able to dig up a pirate's lawn in retaliation.

    11. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Obviously, I was being facetious. However, on a serious note, while it's not clear how the RIAA is harmed by the activity it spends so much time prosecuting, various ISP and ISP-like entities (such as campuses), are harmed in that their bandwidth bills are much higher due to the increased traffic. Therefore, I would seriously argue that while the RIAA can't dig up your yard to recover assets they have a reasonable cause to believe you've hidden there, a University could, if they believed that you had profited from their bandwidth and they had something to recover. Otherwise, they should just add a surcharge onto your tuition bill/ISP bill to cover increased bandwidth usage and legal liability.

      Some universities allegedly saw their bandwidth usage go down 30% or more when they started blocking Napster, etc, so I would argue that if you're profiting from their bandwidth, then they should be allowed to recover those gains.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    12. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      He probably paid taxes on it.

      Just cause you are doing something that you can be liable for...doesnt mean you dont pay the taxes on it.

      As seen here, the IRS would win, AOL will probably lose and never collect anything.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    13. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      Now that the parents of the culprit should have to suffer, is a different matter. They might be entirely innocent and really have no connection to the money.


      They seem to be innocent of raising an honest child.
    14. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Is that just another way of suggesting that the RIAA grab a shovel and take a long walk off a short pier?

      Rich

    15. Re:Sounds liek the RIAA again by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      But... but... they provide so many people jobs :((((((((

  12. How things change by DrXym · · Score: 5, Funny

    AOL move from data mining to actual mining

  13. Geez.. by mtxmorph · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is AOL really that strapped for money? To the point that they have to go digging it up? :)

    1. Re:Geez.. by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      This explains the whining little voice I heard when I logged into AOL tonight: "You're got GOLD!"

  14. Damages by thelonestranger · · Score: 5, Funny

    AOL will not offer to pay for damages caused. However they will give them a one time discount of 50% on an AOL Broadband Platinum account for the first 3 months (Subject to a 12 month contract, standard terms, conditions and fair usage policy apply)

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  15. Oh come on! This is a real life treasure hunt! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    OK, you're AOL management, you've successfully sued a spammer and discover he's hidden all his "hard earned" assets as gold and platinum bars somewhere. If you had the opportunity, wouldn't you be out there with shovels helping to dig the place up? I know I would.

    What they should do is offer a 10% fee for finding the treasure.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Oh come on! This is a real life treasure hunt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 100% finders fee.

  16. Dear Sirs, Madams.. by Tracer_Bullet82 · · Score: 4, Funny

    As you may have heard AOL is currently in the process of gold and platinum extraction from the lands of the Golde's estate.

    We hear at Shark, Shark and Partners represent the Golde's estate. The estate firmly believe that the gold and platinum belong to people/s that have been victims of spam. Certainly not AOL.

    with that in mind the estate would like to invite the public to be in a "treasure hunt". Unfortunately, due to obvious reasons, this cannot be open to all publics.

    Hence we have selested a lucky few to be in the treasure hunt.
    Only 400 has been invited.

    Please reply to this e-mail to accept.

    A processing fee of 20'000 will be required from each participant.

    Yours truly.

    Darl M.

    P.s.. It's very sunny here in Chad. Hope to be vacationing with you next year here.

    P.s.. A processing fee of 20'000 will be required from each participant. We are sure this ceratinly will be a drop

    --


    Timang tinggi tinggi
    parang sudah asah
    alang alang mandi
    biar sampai basah
  17. Tell them to look here by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
    "A good glass in the bishop's hostel in the devil's seat -- forty-one degrees and thirteen minutes -- northeast and by north -- main branch seventh limb east side -- shoot from the left eye of the death's-head -- a bee-line from the tree through the shot fifty feet out."
    Problem solved.
    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Tell them to look here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt like crap when I got up this morning, but finding a Gold Bug ref on /. has completely brightened my day. Cheers!

  18. Ha by Ichigo+Kurosaki · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not if I get there first.

    **grabs shovel**

  19. Erm? by ijakings · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only person here who read the story and thought "Did I get up in a parrallel timeline today?" It is the most random thing ive ever seen. ISP's digging spammers gardens up to look for buried treasure? Watch out AOL, Im sure a producer will be on you to make a movie out of this. You just cant make this sort of stuff up.

  20. He doesn't have any money by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He converted it all to gold... Which isn't such a bad idea the way the dollar is devaluing. Then he disappeared, presumably to come back and get it when AOL have given up.

    People are creatures of habit and familiarity, he's probably hidden it somewhere he's familiar with and is fairly sure it's unlikely to be disturbed. Places he's visited regularly, holidayed, relatives etc. The more often he's been there the greater the familiarity and the greater the chance he's hidden it there. AOL are going after the logical first target.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:He doesn't have any money by MrFebtober · · Score: 1
      Places he's visited regularly, holidayed, relatives etc.

      He's american, so don't bother checking for places he's holidayed. They're better off finding out where he regularly vacationed.
    2. Re:He doesn't have any money by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      And so they dig it up and find their Platinum and Gold.

    3. Re:He doesn't have any money by eneville · · Score: 1

      And so they dig it up and find their Platinum and Gold.

      Oh man, that would be so funny if there were stacks of cds burried there. Totally awesom.

    4. Re:He doesn't have any money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It still seems they're asking for the right to dig up these people's yard based on pure speculation. We know there's gold. We think maybe it might be somewhere in your yard, we have no proof or evidence supporting this theory, but we want to greatly inconveniance these people anyway just in case.

  21. /2 by Austaph · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [2. Trade] [AOL]: WTS ENCHANT /BRACER 5/7/9/GLOVE +/3/15/STAM!!! FIERY/ICY PST!! ! SPIRIT/STRENGTH! /15! +CHEST! /who AOL
    [AOL]: Level 60 Undead Rogue - Hawke's Mom's Backyard
    1 player total

    1. Re:/2 by technos · · Score: 2, Funny

      [AOL]: Level 60 Undead Rogue - Hawke's Mom's Backyard

      I always figured AOL for a Tauren myself. Big, slow-moving, funny looking, and not a whole lot of INT. :)

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    2. Re:/2 by TwilightSentry · · Score: 1

      Really, I always saw them as a grue; they wait, in the darkness, and, when you can't even see the ground in front of you, they attack without mercy...

      On a completely unrelated note, I love the new comment browsing system.

      --
      How to enable garbage collection on a system without protected memory: #define malloc() ((void *) rand())
  22. property records, googlemaps, metal detector... by anticypher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, this is the type of criminal that is hard to pin down. He hasn't been convicted of a criminal offence, he just lost a civil case for scamming. He was smart enough to convert much of his ill gotten gains into easily hidden and transported precious metals, he never drove a flashy car or bought property which could be seized. He analyzed the risks and knew that the worst that could happen to him was forfeiture of his gains in a civil trial, so he purposefully worked to hide those gains.

    Assuming he was smart, he has already moved some of the gold to another country and is living outside the US. What he buried on his parents property was safe for a while, and he could always return and dig it up as needed. What he didn't count on was AOL's private investigators finding his receipts for gold bars, which gave them a lead to how he hid his wealth.

    Now AOL is trying to force his hand. If a large portion of the gold remains on his parent's property, he'll need to return and dig it up before AOL gets a court order. Presumably the property is under surveillance by private detectives who will get a share if they can detect exactly where the stash is hidden and give the courts precise information allowing a less costly recovery. AOL probably doesn't care much about getting the money for themselves as denying the spammer access to it. It sends a message to other spammers that no matter how hard they try to hide their wealth, AOL and the courts will eventually recover it.

    It should be entertaining to see how many treasure hunters find his parent's property and start prospecting in the middle of the night. I'd expect after national news coverage like this, tonight there will be several new holes dug in his parents property, and within weeks most of the property will have been scanned by 'passers-by' who just happened to have a sensitive metal detector while taking a short cut from A to B. If AOL doesn't get in there soon, the gold will certainly be gone, either the parents know where it is and will recover it, the scammer will return some night to get it, or a treasure hunter will eventually get lucky.

    I'm on the wrong continent, so I'll just sit back and wait for the first /.ers to post exact details of the parents property and .kmz files of the property in question. It shouldn't take long now.

    the AC
    US$600,000 per month!?! Damn, I'm in the wrong line of work. Curse my parents for raising me with a sense of morality

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:property records, googlemaps, metal detector... by Don_dumb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah we need some hi-res Google Earth photos, we could turn it into a battleships clone.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    2. Re:property records, googlemaps, metal detector... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me? I'd jail him for contempt of court until such time as he produced the money he very clearly had (or at least proved that he sent it to some 3rd party they could sue for it).

      Of course, I don't know that the laws allow for that.

    3. Re:property records, googlemaps, metal detector... by bitrex · · Score: 1

      42 degrees, 11 minutes, 8 seconds north by 71 degrees 18 minutes 31 seconds west should put you in the general area. Happy hunting!

  23. Charlie Murphy... by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

    You can't make this shit up...

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  24. Unnecessary and too complicated by Flying+pig · · Score: 1

    Archaeologists have plenty of equipment that would detect where the soil has been disturbed in the last few years and identify possible sites. I even got to try one out back in the 60s, and I am sure the state of the art is much advanced since then. My guess is that this is just AOL repeating the shock and awe tactics that have recently worked so well in Iraq and Lebanon - do not resist us or we will wreck your lives to the maximum extent.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  25. Pirates of the Caribbean 4 - The Spammer's Chest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, just ask Capt. Sparrow for the crazy compass and solved. Easy and clean, no krakens, no octopus-faced villains.

  26. wait a tick by Nicaboker · · Score: 0

    AOL can't even get privacy right, what makes anyone think they can work a back hoe or something as complicated as a shovel?

    --
    So many choices, so little tolerance.
  27. Zero Tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's go back to a hand, a foot and your first born for an eye. Next time you'll think twice about committing crime.

    What about instituting the death penalty for all transgressions, however minor? Provided that they occur in a Punishment Zone, of course.

    (CleverNickName^W(The Devil made me do it!)

  28. You've got gold by anticypher · · Score: 1

    So I posted downthread about how I was going to sit back and wait for /.ers and treasure hunters to start posting .kmz files of the parent's property, and digging holes in the middle of the night. Then I went and looked at a few of the treasure hunter sites to see if they are ahead of /. in getting to the story first, and what did I find?

    AOL has a new contest out called Gold Rush that started a few days ago. http://goldrush.aol.com/ (warning, flash, sound, possibly NSFW, datamining)

    Its an advertising gimick to get people to watch AOL-TimeWarner TV shows in order to obtain clues embedded in the shows or commercials. The more confirmed personally identifying information you give them, the more clues they'll email to you. A spamme^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hn online marketer's dream database, also known as a suckers list.

    The timing of this announcement strikes me as strange. Coincidence? I think not!

    Maybe they need to get this spammer's gold for the prize

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  29. Urgent business opportunity by gsasha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Sir,

    This is Davis Wolfgang Hawke, an ex-spammer that lost a $12 million lawsuit from AOL, who are going to seize my $6 million in gold and platinum bars that I've hidden in the area of Boston, MA.

    I need to recover the gold bars as soon as possible, before the AOL investigators get a chance to dig them up, however, I am unable to come back to US in fear of being arrested.

    To this end, I'm seeking your cooperation. I'm willing to provide you with 10% share of the fortune, which is $600,000 dollars (sig hundred thousand dollars) in gold and platinum bars. Please, this business is extremely urgent and I will need your cooperation soon. I know you are a honest person, because I found your name in one of my extensively verified spam-lists, and I would like to conduct this business with you. You can remain confident that this business is completely safe as there is no risk for you whatsoever, only gains to be made. If you are willing to make this business with me, contact me at grep_shmep_20143@yahoo.com.

    Best Regards,
    Davis

    1. Re:Urgent business opportunity by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dammit, you beat me to it. Well done.

  30. Hawke by Kev_Stewart · · Score: 1
    ...is a neo nazi, so he's bound to have some gold buried somewhere! Maybe a few long-lost works of art too?

    ;-)

  31. Medfield, Ma by erbbysam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live and currently am typing this in Medfield and I have to say that this is one of the biggest things to happen to this town since Disney started using the name in all of his movies... Wiki page on medfield There's only about 12,000 people in the town and I know exactly where that house is which kinda makes me want to take a walk with a shovel this weekend...

    1. Re:Medfield, Ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm down the street in Medway... I may need to come by and see what all the commotion is about

    2. Re:Medfield, Ma by nubnub · · Score: 1

      Oh come on now, Drew Bledsoe used to live here in Medfield, Curt Schilling now does, and the town was on Extreme Home Makeover last year. We're not completely dead.

  32. It's not just any gold by spezz · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's Nazi Gold.

    The sweetest loot of all.

    1. Re:It's not just any gold by Born2bwire · · Score: 1

      Don't they know that when it comes to Nazi gold instead of digging it up you have to push up against all the walls?

  33. Spamming should be a life sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spamming is as bad as murder, and should be punished as such.

    Seconds in a person's life:

    70 * 365.25 * 24 * 60 * 60
    = 2,209,032,000

    Assuming everyone spends 2 minutes a day dealing with spam (120 seconds)
    then the population needed for 1 lifetime to be wasted a day is:

    2,209,032,000 / 120
    = 18,408,600

    Taking a rough estimate of half the UK+US population as active e-mail users being 180 million, it is now clear that spam kills 10 people a day.

  34. Keeping AOL of your property by gsn · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Declare Hunting Season open
    2) Invite Dick Cheney
    3) Invite AOL to come dig
    4) Make commemorative buttons
    5) Profit - Earn more than buried treasure is worth

    (ducks)

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:Keeping AOL of your property by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Hank Landry: The last thing I want is for this(mutated invisible animal loose in Colorado) to become the OK Corral.
      Cameron Mitchell: Or a Vice-Presidential duck hunt.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  35. Uh, metal detector? by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Two questions:

    1) Haven't these people heard of a metal detector?

    2) Now that this is public, have the authorities or AOL taken steps to stop random people sneaking onto this poor family's property in the dead of night to do a little digging?

  36. Ah, it's ironic... by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if they dug up my back garden, they'd find 5 years worth of unsolicited ISP CDs they used to send me - oh, let's call them spam for the sake of argument - and bloody annoying they were too!

  37. Hmmm ... by NoSalt · · Score: 0

    Is this a /. story or a Pirates of the Caribbean plot???

  38. AOL used to spam too... by robizzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just before I had enough floppy discs to do anything fun with, they switched to CDs.

    1. Re:AOL used to spam too... by booch · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they paid for those to be sent to you. It did not cost you anything to receive them. With email, you pay a portion of the cost of the email they send.

      On the other hand, it's getting to the point where the amount of credit card applications I get are starting to cost me. Like in having to buy a shredder to make sure nobody steals the applications to steal my identity and get a credit card in my name.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:AOL used to spam too... by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but they paid for those to be sent to you. It did not cost you anything to receive them. With email, you pay a portion of the cost of the email they send.

      But those AOL CDs do cost money to throw away, even if you live in a city with free trash pickup, or you take these CDs to someone else's trashbin, or you donate them to goodwill. It's petty to think about, your end expence to toss them is rather small, but think about how many of those suckers are in the landfill and how much space they occcupy, and how long they take to decompose.

      It wasn't so bad when they offered their software in the DVD long box, but the current pack is practicaly unuseable in any practical way.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:AOL used to spam too... by booch · · Score: 1

      I'm single. I used the CDs as coasters.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  39. When Sarcasm backfires. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I could just see it at a board meeting. AOL Is trying to find a revenu source. Some young guy goes well we could go looking for burried treasure. Then the managers stop and think about it walk out the room and in 5 minutes come back in with Patches on their eyes and Pirate hats, and yell "Arr Maty Treature!"

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  40. poor family? - free vacations by acomj · · Score: 1

    Think of all the free vacations this family is being offered to get them "out of the house" so to speak.

  41. Geotechnical solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... stupid lawyers... Why don't they use some advanced geotechnical monitoring technique like TDR/ODR to map changes in their soil density (suggesting disturbance). If the gold/platnium is burried that should give you a clue without digging up their whole yard... They could also use a side scanning (X-ray?) that are used in ports and by border patrols looking for large changes in object mass. It should be easy to get a warrent for these without destructively tearring up someones property that has little if anything associated with the case.

    Are there any geologists, siezmologists, etc. that could shed light on these techniques?

        -- reflecting on rocks.

  42. This is the address I came up with: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using the info of his birthname from the Salon article, the birth town in the CNN article, and plugging it all into switchboard.com I came up with:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=125+Philip +St,+Medfield,+MA+02052-2815&ie=UTF8&ll=42.178162, -71.275778&spn=0.030404,0.085831&t=k&om=1

    So grab your shovels!

  43. "Italian Garden" Joke by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Reminds me of an old joke I remember reading:

    (Found here)
    An old Italian man lived alone in the country. He wanted to dig his tomato garden, but it was very hard work as the ground was hard. His only son, Vincent, who used to help him, was in prison. The old man wrote a letter to his son and described his predicament.

    Dear Vincent,

    I am feeling pretty bad because it looks like I won't be able to plant my tomato garden this year. I'm just getting too old to be digging up a garden plot. If you were here my troubles would be over. I know you would dig the plot for me.

    Love Dad

    A few days later he received a letter from his son.

    Dear Dad,

    Not for nothing, but don't dig up that garden. That's where I buried the BODIES.

    Love Vinnie

    At 4 a.m., the next morning, FBI agents and local police arrived and dug up the entire area without finding any bodies. They apologized to the old man and left. That same day the old man received another letter from his son.

    Dear Dad,

    Go ahead and plant the tomatoes now. That's the best I could do under the circumstances.

    Love Vinnie

    Just make sure you tell them that you think the bars are buried under those big rocks you've been wanting to remove from the garden ... free landscaping. I think I'll have to call the Feds right now!
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  44. You are both wrong... by Mille+Mots · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It was on CSI: Crime Scene Imagineering

  45. Damage could be desirable by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    True, but assuming AOL gets permission from a court to search the area, they really have no motivation to be less destructive than they're allowed to be. If they can demonstrate to a judge that there's reasonable cause to believe that the couple are protecting a cache of misbegotten goods, and one of their goals is also to make a point to the world/public about spamming and how it's not a good thing to do, then it would make sense that they would try and argue for the most destructive method of searching available.

    I'd say that the best way to do it would be to go in there with heavy equipment, and just run all the dirt on the property down to a depth of about six feet or so through a sifter. It's probably reasonably cheap from AOL's perspective (all you need is a backhoe and a separator/sifter -- that's probably not the right term for it, but you've probably seen the machines that do this), and it creates a nice TV image if what you want to show is a spammer/family-of-spammer getting their lives trashed.

    A whole lot of people out there really hate spammers; it's one of those things that pretty much everybody hates and has to deal with, and the idea that people who profited (potentially) from spam are getting their lives turned upside down isn't necessarily a bad PR move. Of course, it could easily backfire if the people in question can portray themselves as the victims, but if they're sufficiently uncharismatic, don't think for a moment that the American public won't be beside themselves with glee seeing their lawn get trashed. Public opinion in this country has a bit of a vengeful streak -- there's nothing we like better than seeing karma come around and bite someone in the ass.

    All depends on who can make themselves look like the good guy.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Damage could be desirable by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. And I think AOL should not put the landscaping back the way it was: leave the spammer's yard with big piles of dirt. Let the spamming scumbags sue to recover the cost of re-landscaping and drag the suit out as long as possible. I never thought I'd be on AOL's side for anything, but this is one exception.

    2. Re:Damage could be desirable by booch · · Score: 1

      One slight problem with that. The US Constitution says that you cannot punish a family for the crimes of an individual.

      On the other hand, if there really is gold on their land, it's a good indication that the family may have been an accomplice to hiding the funds from the authorities.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    3. Re:Damage could be desirable by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      leave the spammer's yard with big piles of dirt.

      This is the spammer's parents' house. If you read the article, you would know that the spammer drove an old beater car and never owned property. He was a millionaire on paper, not by lifestyle. Punishing his parents for his crime is wrong and illegal.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    4. Re:Damage could be desirable by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

    5. Re:Damage could be desirable by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Then again, if AOL fails to find anything, the family can sue AOL for more when they've been destructive. Besides, vengeance tactics aren't good PR for any company. What would potential AOL customers think when they see AOL taking revenge on the family of somebody they don't like? It sure as hell wouldn't make me feel more comfortable about my ISP if they did it.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  46. Fools by Mephij · · Score: 5, Funny

    They only got half the medalion! The staff was too long. They're digging in the wrong place!

  47. Don't mod up by 4D6963 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Apprently the parent poster is a reposting troll. original post

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  48. Gold and Platinum? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    Was it gold and platinum, or is that some kind of error and it's really gold-pressed latinum? I'd imagine it's actually the latter, as that's the twelfth spammer rule of acquisition.

  49. Victims?? Wtf?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really don't get all the talk about victims here ... these people are as bad as the spammers, they actually _bought_ junk from the spammers (ie. encouraging the trade).

    If there's any question about where that $12m should go, how about all of us who're not simple enough to buy junk from spam and actually were victims to Wolfe's unsolicited emailing???

  50. Gold Rush! by scruffy · · Score: 1

    There's gold in them there spam!

  51. Obligatory TV Movie quote by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1

    In 1978, a made-for-TV adaptation of "The Grass Is Always Greener Over The Septic Tank," by Erma Bombeck. Carol Burnett played the narrator, who is a housewife whose family has been battling the perils of suburbia, including the perfect lawn.

    I remember the very ending, where their doorbell rings, and their landlord tells them, "Congratulations! We just found out that your septic tank is not up to code, so we'll have to install a brand new one for you!" The family members shout with dismay, until the father calms them down and says, "I don't care what they say, they are not digging up our front yard."

    The next scene shows a backhoe proceeding to rip a huge chunk out of a nicely-kept lawn, with the family members watching disconsolately, as the end credit start rolling while the backhoe keeps digging.

    At the very, very end, the screen goes black, and you hear a voice:

    "I'm sorry, sir, I could've sworn that the septic tank was in the front yard!"

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  52. Gold Digger (AOL Remix) by mdboyd · · Score: 1

    The new smash hit remix from Kanye West and Jamie Foxx

  53. Re:"Italian Garden" Joke.. in Soviet Russia by John+Courtland · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://www.netjeff.com/humor/item.cgi?file=kgb.txt

    The phone rings at KGB headquarters.

    "Hello?"

    "Hello, is this KGB?"

    "Yes. What do you want?"

    "I'm calling to report my neighbor Yankel Rabinovitz as an enemy of the
    State. He is hiding undeclared diamonds in his firewood."

    "This will be noted."

    Next day, the KGB goons come over to Rabinovitz's house. They search
    the shed where the firewood is kept, break every piece of wood, find no
    diamonds, swear at Yankel Rabinovitz and leave.

    The phone rings at Rabinovitz's house.

    "Hello, Yankel! Did the KGB come?"

    "Yes."

    "Did they chop your firewood?"

    "Yes, they did."

    "Okay, now it's your turn to call. I need my vegetable patch plowed."

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  54. When I saw this headline, I thought it was metapho by Lijemo · · Score: 1

    You know, when I saw this headline, I thought it was metaphorical.

    I have a vauge memory of a story where AOL was going "fight spam" by disallowing any bulk mail to come to their subscribers unless the sender paid AOL a fee. I thought this is what the headline was referring to-- that AOL was "digging up [it's own] yard" (i.e. pissing off it's customers by blocking legitimate newsletters, while letting spammers through if they paid) for "spam[mers] gold" (the gate-fee paid by bulk e-mailers.)

    I didn't even consider the possibility that the headline was literal, until I read the write-up...

  55. burried treasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr wes digging for burried treasure

  56. They'll be disappointed... by shdwtek · · Score: 1

    ...when all they find is a bunch of Gold and Platinum AOL CDs...

  57. Hmmm spammer huh? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    I bet the Gold and Platinum wasn't precious metals... he probably spent the money on a Gold digging Platinum Blonde and of course plenty of V1agra, so sorry AOL the money is long gone, re-spent on Vera Wang, Plastic Surgery and Facials at the local Spa....

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  58. A-4? by spun · · Score: 1

    You sank my spammership!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  59. Bring it on! by CPIMatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I knew that AOL was coming with bulldozers to dig in my yard, I would go out and get a couple hundred ingots of iron and bury them around my yard at random. Maybe also buy a few junk cars and park them around the yard.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Bring it on! by Frightening · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're a kind soul. I'd buy pet scorpions and plenty of natural fertiliser. Also, there's no law against having make-believe grendades and expended munitions buried in your yard. I'd give em a show, I would.

  60. Digg link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have a link to this story from Digg.com?

  61. Digging up buried treasure... by mentaldingo · · Score: 0

    Digging up buried treasure, eh? Beware, AOL, the *AA might sue you for piracy.

  62. A hint to where the gold is REALLY buried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Greenbaum said her husband and father intend to challenge AOL's plans to dig on the family's property...

    Hmmm, husband AND father? This doesn't sound like MA to me. Perhaps an embedded clue to where the treasure is really buried -- Kentucky!

    1. Re:A hint to where the gold is REALLY buried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not so. Years ago, while studying engineering in at UMASS-Amherst (that's WESTERN Mass, son...) I discovered a valley that time and genetic exchange had forgotten. It was called Pumpkin Hollow, and it was accessed by a dirt road that dropped into a closed off valley.

      The valley contained 4 farmhouses, and the kids that ran up to me could have fallen out of any of the earlier Firefox books. The one boy, whose teeth would have been welcome in any Waffle House, explained '...and them two got marred and moved into THAT house, then this one marred that one 'n' them all moved into that OTHER house...' Etc.

      Very Scary. And from Massachusetts.

  63. Buried treasure in New Hampshire!!! by us7892 · · Score: 1

    "Greenbaum said the family believes Hawke buried gold in the White Mountains 130 miles north of Boston."

    A clue! Buried treasure up in the White Mountains! There is going to be some serious treasure hunting going on up there...

  64. Why Gold and not Diamonds or Rubies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Precious metals are heavy and hard to transport. Millions of dollars in gold or platimum, that is a lot of weight to move around and smuggle over the border.
    Diamonds and rubies are much lighter, easy to carry and harder to identify if buried (no metal detectors). For preciuos stones the dollar value per unit weight is much higher. Sure gold and platinum can be chemically transformed and kept in solution but those chemical compounds are corrosive and hard to store. Glass or plastic conteiners must be used and can easily break.
    Who knows maybe the origin of precious stones is easier to track down (just a guess)

  65. Game transcript from Neverwinter Nights: by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1
    Here is a game transcript that I found somewhere. It seems to be from the new premium module for Neverwinter Nights, titled "Spammers of Cape Cod":
    • "This map only works in the 'Spammer's Back Yard' section!"
    • "First, go to the Garden Hose, located 13 paces southwest from your current position."
    • "You found the Garden Hose!"
    • "Now, go to the Birdbath, located 27 paces northeast from your current position."
    • "You found the Birdbath!"
    • "Now, go to the Garden Hose, located 14 paces southeast from your current position."
    • "You found the Garden Hose!"
    • "Now, go to the collection of AOL CD's, located 14 paces southwest from your current position."
    • "You found the collection of AOL CD's!"
    • "The final location is the septic tank vent hole, located 20 paces south from your current position."
    • "You uncovered the treasure!"
    • Contents: A note from the prior searchers, saying, "Better luck next time!"


    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  66. Radar survey by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Radar survey can take a couple of months, but it wouldn't be destructive, only annoying.
    And, if AOL wants to dig the parents' farm, they certainly have some evidence that the guy bought gold and platinum and at least some hearsay that the guy planted it there. They may even know approximately where; so, no, the only reason to fight this is that the money is there.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Radar survey by tilde.d · · Score: 1

      "Hearsay" in the form of expert witnesses I can accept. "Hearsay" in the form of rumors or people without the support of creditible proof I can't. I'm sorry but the fact that they know the spammer bought the gold and platinum is not proof of WHERE he hid it. Of course, I can't say with 100% assurance that they don't have this info but from what I have read in the article, I side with the family. I still believe that one is innocent until proven, without a reasonable doubt, that they are guilty.

      Your aerial radar suggestion though I do applaud as it is perfectly viable and is less invasive then just walking up with a shovel and digging. You may still run up against Privacy Advocates but is a much more reasonable compromise for the two sides.

  67. I Love Reality by airship · · Score: 1

    You just can't make this stuff up.

    Stories like this prove that fact is WAY funnier than fiction.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  68. Throw your TV away by Khyber · · Score: 1

    metal detecting that high up would require an electromagnetic field strong enough - guess what would happen if you tried using such a powerful EM field from that high up to scan for buried metals? Any CRT TV, computer, hell possibly even car, would get nicely fucked up.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  69. Race to the bottom by Morrigu · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're trying to beat out Sony this month.

    --
    "We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - Major Mike Shearer, UK
  70. "How to get your fall garden area dug" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darn, I wish my son was that smart to help us out on the fall planting. I have 700 acres that need tilled and planted with winter wheat.

    Hey AOL, I think Davis Wolfgang Hawke buried something on my 700 acre farm, about 1 foot down. Please bring your tractors and plowing equipment. I will supply the winter wheat seed. My wife says he put something in the junks cars that are rusting over there---could you please haul them away for investigation. You don't have to return them.

    Thanks,
    An American Farmer

  71. Re:"Italian Garden" Joke.. as seen on "Wings" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cursed infallable memory dredged up this: There was an episode of Wings where they were all stuck at the airport and hypnotizing each other. The fat guy, while glassy-eyed and slowly speaking, told everyone he had burried a ton of money in his backyard. So, natch, they all go there without him and dig up his backyard. But he was pretending, knowing they would dig it up, and what he really wanted was to save money on installing a hot tub.

  72. Best chance ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...for nomoreaolcds.com to get rid of a huge bunch of AOL-Platinum-Membership- and AOL-Gold-Membership-CDs.

    Just offer that poor family for a nominal fee of only $1M to bury their (at this point) 399176 AOL-CDs and wait for the big fun.

  73. Yarrrrr by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Buried loot in the yarrrrrrrd!

  74. Buried loot in the... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    ...yarrrrrrrrrrrrd!

  75. The ultimate irony... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Would be if AOL managed to dig up a massive cache of AOL floppies and CDs instead.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  76. gold and platinum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think people should send the family all those AOL Gold and Platinum spam cds they used to send out to bury all over their backyard for a laugh.

  77. AOL CDs.. by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    Once they dig up the site they'll find an unstoppable cache of discarded Free Internet with AOL -CDs, anyway.. ;)

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  78. Burden of proof? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Even if AOL finds gold, don't they have to PROVE it is the specific gold they were looking for and not some other gold?

  79. Anyone know the address of this garden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so I can skip straight to step 4 profit ?

  80. How does one attain these?! by Mykid8yours · · Score: 1

    gold and platinum bars




    Is anyone curious at all as to where he even got them? I mean it's not like you can go to your local bank or Wal-Mart and get them. What'd he do, break into Ft. Knox?

  81. Poor Spammer by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    The dude was a Neo-Nazi for christ's sake and people here are acting like he's the poor victim of the evil corporate empire. Give me a break. The dude is a slimeball - even his girlfriend ratted him out - and is probably trying to cook up something else illegal.

    1. Re:Poor Spammer by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you might want to read the comments before you start trolling, very few people are defending him, some are defending his parents. And how exactly my statement "I hate the spammer" translate to me acting like he is a poor victim I will never know.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  82. Creative ways to battle spam by milal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since AOL's conventional ways to battle spam were obviously lacking results, they've turned to very creative methods to fight back. But seriously, why aren't they employing better security methods? AOL has always had a problem with spam,, at least when I was a customer. Though this might make a good read, I don't see it as a way to solve the problem.

  83. Needle's in the haystack are easy to find... by Spacepup · · Score: 1

    His parents could make it much more difficult and bury lots of metal crap in their yard. It would be just like using AOL to search for anything...

  84. "WTF" doesn't even begin to cover it.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
    I get that Hawke bought gold and platinum:

    AOL submitted receipts reflecting large purchases by Hawke of gold and platinum bars, Graham said.


    The part I'm missing is what evidence AOL has, that led them to the conclusion that it's in his parents' yard... As opposed to ANYWHERE ELSE ON EARTH that it could be.

    In other news, AOL's head lawyer is Cartman, and he wants your "Jew gold".
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant