Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond

savio13 writes "Sam Ramji, Microsoft's director of its Open Source Software Lab has invited 4 Mozilla developers to spend 4 days with Microsoft's Vista Readiness ISV team. The invite can be found on mozilla.dev.planning and was posted on Saturday (Aug. 19). Schroepfer replied by indicating that Microsoft and the Moz guys are already in contact via email and will follow up on the offer there. This is interesting because Sam posted the offer in a public forum (and indicated that he'd sent a PM, but was posting in case they had an @microsoft.com email filter). Sam also made a point of stating that the Vista ISV Readiness offer is typically only for commercial ISVs."

294 comments

  1. It's a TRAP!!! by Emrikol · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_a_trap Seriously, watch out! Pretty soon, we'll have no more coders!

    --
    You're all bastards!
    1. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Why is this first post a troll when the second post saying the same thing is +5 funny?

      *shakes head at mods on crack*

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by should_be_linear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hello Firefox guys, my name is Balmer, Steve Balmer. Those folks you see closed in s cage is our "IE team". You will decide what is their destiny. Look at our latest sources, and tell me, but honestly, is there any use of it?

      --
      839*929
    3. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by A+Commentor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't all fly on the same plane, ride in the same car, or use the same elevator... It's better to lose 1 than all 4 ;-)

      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    4. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1, Redundant
      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    5. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by doti · · Score: 1

      hehe, the "isatrap" /. tag was never so apropiately fun.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    6. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
    7. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Richy_T · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coming soon: Soylent Green, brought to you by the people at Microsoft.

    8. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wow, you are kinda new to the whole idea of "Free software" aren't you? That and paragraph breaks. And reality.

      You DO know that MS can simply READ the source code for Firefox, just like the rest of us? And come out with their own version (according to the license) without inviting anyone? And they have IE7 and don't want to?

      And wtf exactly is a "M$ edition of Firefox"? Is this like Firefox, but it runs on Microsoft operating systems, like Firefox does now?

      How do you claim better support for Firefox? Firefox is the CLIENT, it is supposed to support the protocols, not the other way around, right?

      "a quality browser that supports m$ locked in content". Isn't that IE6/7, and not Firefox?

      Seriously, I am saying this with love: Switch to decaf.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by psxman · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft can afford four bombs.

    10. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the same thing will hapen to them that did to OpenGFS developers ;)

      just take a look at their last news: http://opengfs.sourceforge.net/

    11. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, no no:


      The Firefox team is herded into a giant enclosure lined with sand. At the other end they see another gaggle of pasty-faced geeks, who, judging by their ID badges, appear to be the Microsoft IE team.

      From up on high, a whiny, nasal voice, belonging to Microsoft Chairman Ballmer, rings out:

      "Remember where you are - this is Thunderdome, and death is listening, and will take the first man that screams."

      One of the IE guys flinches at this, while the others exhibit lifeless eyes, dulled from too much Caffeine and long coding jags.

      Ballmer cuts through again, this time louder:

      "Two teams enter, one team leaves!"

      The cry is picked by the watching multitudes:

      "TWO TEAMS ENTER! ONE TEAM LEAVES! TWO TEAMS ENTER! ONE TEAM LEAVES! TWO TEAMS ENTER! ONE TEAM LEAVES!"

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    12. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Venim · · Score: 1

      Nooo you beat me too it. this is exactly what i was thinking when i clicked the rss link on my google page to this!

    13. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Funny
      "a quality browser that supports m$ locked in content". Isn't that IE6/7, and not Firefox?


      And there your credibility goes out the window:)
    14. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but if they crowd a single blaster bomb will be enough!

    15. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Minwee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He didn't say what kind of quality it was.

    16. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by A+Commentor · · Score: 1
      I think Microsoft can afford four bombs.

      If there was only one "incident", it could be explained away as an accident... That gets alittle harder when there 4 "incidents".

      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    17. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by ajs · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine went to one of these MS love-ins (his company was invited). It was uneventful, and MS had them down to a science. The only thing that really shocked him was that at one point, they offered them a tray of fruit, and there was a pomegranate there. Now, there's no practical reason to put out a pomegranate as snack food. it's messy, sticky, and can take a LONG time to pick apart.

      However, mythologically, there's rather heavy symbolism in the offering of a pomegranate to visitors... it just made him wonder. Needless to say, he did not eat it.

    18. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't we just get beyond Thunderdome?

    19. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Not good. After all, seineew era sreenigne xoferif right?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    20. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Correct. Remember, without quality control, quality might get out of hand.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    21. Re:It's a TRAP!!! by MacBastard · · Score: 1

      Ballmer: And this is the room where we insert the chips into your skulls.

      FireFox Engineers: Uh, what?

      (door slams, bolts slide shut)

      FireFox Engineers: AAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUGGGGHHHHHH!

      (darkness)

      --
      - Semper Ubi Sub Ubi!
  2. Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by all204 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's a trap!

    1. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by john83 · · Score: 1

      Fighters coming in.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    2. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cyberia?

    3. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

      "That's not an operating system..."

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Evil Dead 3 can teach us anything, and I believe it can, it is to bring an axe to occations like this one. Just to be on the safe side.

    5. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an axe? I want my chainsaw and my boomstick.

    6. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by Ougarou · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, It's great to see how M$ is taking open source and building a "community" using a highly "secure office space for 4 people"! Somehow I still don't think they know what they are dealing with here.

    7. Re:Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by john83 · · Score: 1

      No, it's the next line of dialogue after Akbar's "It's a trap!" in Return of the Jedi.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  3. Future news splash: by Vengeance · · Score: 4, Funny

    Four Mozilla developers missing, story at eleven.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    1. Re:Future news splash: by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      The murders were captured on video and displayed worldwide using the Nurve system. These programmers are being beaten to death!

    2. Re:Future news splash: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I rather see it as "Firefox developers zapped by fricken laser beams"

      "Are those fricken' sharks with fricken' laser beams attached to their fricken' heads? "

    3. Re:Future news splash: by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think this is a bad thing. Well missing developers would be, but I think the more meetings Microsoft has to Mozilla, the more likely it is that Windows Vista will suck less. An exchange of ideas doesn't have to make the "good" ones more evil.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Future news splash: by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember when some MS developer was first courting the Mozilla developers a while ago saying how great their product is and that the [Moz] should use Avalon because Vista will be the bomb.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    5. Re:Future news splash: by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

      I remember when some woman ate 43 cel phones set to vibrate. She liked dialing them all at once from a phone bank. I won't link to a source either, you'll just need to take my word for it.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    6. Re:Future news splash: by Ucklak · · Score: 1
      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    7. Re:Future news splash: by cptgrudge · · Score: 0, Troll

      Outstanding! You linked to a source! It isn't unjustified MS-bashing after all! Sweet!

      Forgive me, but I can't link to a source myself. Honestly, I just made it up to bait you, since I don't have time to do a google search every time someone makes an un-sourced claim.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  4. Never forget what Kosh said! by krell · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If you go to Z'ha'dum, you will die."

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:Never forget what Kosh said! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Yes."

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Never forget what Kosh said! by Burdell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they'll get better.

    3. Re:Never forget what Kosh said! by ahsile · · Score: 1

      Meh, he got resurrected.

    4. Re:Never forget what Kosh said! by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Funny

      But only for 20 years - MS has a long term plan in mind here. In 20 years when Vista is released, all the Moz developers will die and IE7 will be unopposed by default.

    5. Re:Never forget what Kosh said! by Kyoushu · · Score: 0

      We can only hope they fly a White Star with a bomb into the building

    6. Re:Never forget what Kosh said! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG... Sheridan was a terrorist!

  5. My prediction: by kotj.mf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In a couple of weeks, we'll see a /. article about how four Mozilla developers have mysteriously disappeared, followed shortly thereafter by one about how they've been found in the trunk of Ballmer's car.

    --
    hang brain.
    1. Re:My prediction: by kurrik · · Score: 1

      More like Mozilla's trunk in Ballmer's Explorer

  6. Sorry, have to do this by albert28 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Watch out for chairs!

    1. Re:Sorry, have to do this by mgblst · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ha, I can see it now.

      Mozilla guys walk into a big room.
      Microsoftie: Hey guys, thanks for coming down here. We have a lot to talk about. Take a seat and we will get started.
      Mozilla guys: Um, there are no chairs in this room?
      Steve Ballmer breaks through the wall, armed with a number of vicous looking chairs.
      Steve: Did someone want a chair...hahaha.

      I imagine this sort of thing happens all the time at Redmond.

    2. Re:Sorry, have to do this by ak3ldama · · Score: 5, Funny

      Steve Ballmer breaks through the wall, armed with a number of vicous looking chairs.

      I figured he'd break through the wall all pimped out like a pitcher of Kool-Aid!

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    3. Re:Sorry, have to do this by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those chair jokes never get old.

    4. Re:Sorry, have to do this by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      Your sig struck at tone...

      This is a move to contain lower cost apple PCs...

      Basic "Art of war". The worst thing is to beseige their cities (block their clients)...
      The master stratagist uses his enemies to fight his enemies, and everyone capitulates.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    5. Re:Sorry, have to do this by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Or rather "Ooooooh CHAAAAIIRRRR...."

      That was terrible, I know. I'll go quietly.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    6. Re:Sorry, have to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hear that Ballmer has a great motivational speech aimed at developers. Also, ask him his opinion on working for Microsoft and watch him go..

    7. Re:Sorry, have to do this by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You are so right - they will never ever get old.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    8. Re:Sorry, have to do this by zanglang · · Score: 1

      Aww, you can't have one without the other: *breaks wall*Ooooooooh YEAHhHhhhhhhh!*pant* *sweat* I-LOVE_THIS-COMPANY! *throws chair at Mozilla devs*

    9. Re:Sorry, have to do this by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      You know, this is all rapidly degenerating into something like the Demented Cartoon Movie. I'm convinced that one day Slashdot's meme will be him coming on television, saying "Developers developers developers" and blowing up the world.

      Actually, that would be good, now I think about it.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  7. Dancing Pachyderm by krell · · Score: 1

    "about how they've been found in the trunk of Ballmer's car"

    I thought the trunk was one of Ballmer's physical features.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:Dancing Pachyderm by Vengeance · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nah, Ballmer is all head and ass.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  8. Sense motive checks abound by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But seriously, I think that Microsoft is trying to get third party OSS browser support for Vista so that they can announce it as a feature. "Look, we have great support for the BEST free browsers out there! We are cool and friendly!" It has become obvious to Microsoft that OSS is not going away and that they need to embrace some of the popular choices in an effort to stem the flow away from Linux, etc. Seems pretty obvious to me.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:Sense motive checks abound by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't be so conspirative; I just think it's to cover their asses in case Firefox would have Vista trouble. After all, ~10% browser share according to common analyst firms marks a pretty common Windows software they likely want to work for user not to go "screw Vista, even Firefox don't work!".

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Sense motive checks abound by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would be nice if Microsoft simply included a branded version of Firefox with Windows Vista. (e.g. one with MSN search as default search engine instead of Google).

    3. Re:Sense motive checks abound by jimicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is said that they who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it:

      http://news.com.com/2100-1023-279561.html?legacy=c net

    4. Re:Sense motive checks abound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you people -ever- satisfied? Fucking whiners.

    5. Re:Sense motive checks abound by emilv · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nice? In what way would THAT be nice? :/

    6. Re:Sense motive checks abound by orielbean · · Score: 1

      You can tell this also from where the invite came from - head of their Open Source Software Lab. Whether or not they sink any money into it is the true test of their intent. Our Government is great at that - creating the mandate then quietly strip its funding down to a single dog and pony show.

    7. Re:Sense motive checks abound by MrDoh1 · · Score: 1

      So why would Microsoft spend/give money on/to a product that they don't own/control when they already spend tons of money on their own, competing, proprietary implementation?

      --
      I am Homer of Borg. Resistance is Fut.. Mmmmmmmm, Donuts!
    8. Re:Sense motive checks abound by orielbean · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Companies always spend money on discerning the opposition's methods. GM/Ford buys the other guys' cars to determine what their new tech is for each model. Wired had a cool article on it. Just b/c they want to compete does not mean they don't spend money on understanding the competition.

    9. Re:Sense motive checks abound by MrDoh1 · · Score: 1

      Fine, but the competition is open... no need to spend money to understand it, just download the code and read it like everyone else can. Not exactly the same as the Ford/GM analogy in my mind unless they are giving the cars to each other.

      --
      I am Homer of Borg. Resistance is Fut.. Mmmmmmmm, Donuts!
    10. Re:Sense motive checks abound by orielbean · · Score: 1

      I wasn't clear on the explanation - sorry bout that. I mean they are paying their employees to research this. They could be working on the next foul DRM scheme but instead M$ pays them to research OSS. Not so much in the hardware sense, although they are using computer / server capacity in the research, or that they are purchasing the software like a car, but more in the allocation of resources, however big or small it may be.

      My point was that seeing how much is spend in terms of time & resources is the indicator as to how serious they take the opposition. You can also add in lobbyist / lawyer fees to keep OSS out of thier markets, like the Massachusetts openoffice fight.

    11. Re:Sense motive checks abound by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      Nice? In what way would THAT be nice? :/

      It would get rid of IE as the default browser. Who knows what sort of problems they would add to it, but at least we'd finally be rid of IE.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    12. Re:Sense motive checks abound by killjoe · · Score: 1

      If they really were concerned with that they would have open sourced XAML so that mozilla could render it too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  9. It's a trap! by Pao|o · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Beware Mozillans...

  10. ObPython by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Mozilla developers will be carried along a corridor on a conveyor belt in extreme comfort and past murals depicting Mediterranean scenes, towards the rotating knives. The last twenty feet of the corridor are heavily soundproofed.

    1. Re:ObPython by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Microsoft greeter: Meeting with Microsoft, or freedom?

      Firefox devs: Meeting with Microsoft

      Microsoft greeter: Through the door, line on the left, one chair-bearing-a-startling-resemblance-to-a-cross each.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  11. I think it is interesting by Enselic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hopefully this invitation is simply a consequence of that Microsoft has (finally) realized that there is no way they will be able to keep up with OSS in the long run. Maybe they have finally realized that sooner or later, given enough time, every commercial application will have a free counterpart.

    1. Re:I think it is interesting by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 1

      Most of them do have free counterparts, and yet most of the world doesn't touch em.

    2. Re:I think it is interesting by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe they want more browser developers and those dudes proved themselves.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:I think it is interesting by Software · · Score: 1

      I think they want fewer Firefox developers, and the way to do this would be to get hire them away. They have done this before (Borland comes to mind).

    4. Re:I think it is interesting by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "I think they want fewer Firefox developers, and the way to do this would be to get hire them away. They have done this before (Borland comes to mind)."

      I think even Microsoft would see that this would be a terrible way to stifle FF. Too many people willing to take their place, too many people who'd want to take the place just to get that juicy job in Redmond.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  12. A Bruce Campbell quote for this... by The_DOD_player · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a trick - get an axe!

    1. Re:A Bruce Campbell quote for this... by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      Alright you primitive screwheads, listen up. That's just what we call pillow talk, baby. Say hello to the 21st century!

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  13. Moz devs: Be sure to catch the tour! by deadhammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be amazed at the open source research lab, the award winning cafeteria, the empty lot out back where Microsoft employee Vinnie "The Bonecrusher" Vetallini will explain in intricate detail Microsoft's browser strategy.

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  14. Wow by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1
    The first several posters all think it's a trap.

    Now I'm scared for the Mozilla developers. Thanks for making me lose sleep, guys.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    1. Re:Wow by ahsile · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I had mod points, I'd make you pay for those evil comments!

      btw... Linux rulez, Micro$oft winblow$ drulez :P

    2. Re:Wow by miro+f · · Score: 1

      oh the irony... poor poor AC...

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  15. Sun Tzu by quakeroatz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" (c. 6th century BC)

    1. Re:Sun Tzu by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      (c. 6th century BC)

      Sun Tzu was 4th century BC, but his advice is still apposite. I think Machiavelli might have said it better though, if less succinctly.

      And it ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.
      Better to acquire a lukewarm defender that retain a bitter enemy...
      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Sun Tzu by mqduck · · Score: 1

      "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" (c. 6th century BC)

      Yup, Microsoft finally catches up with 6th Century BC China.

      --
      Property is theft.
    3. Re:Sun Tzu by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or the GodFatherII

  16. Email filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the "in case the had a @microsoft.com filter" comment?

    1. Re:Email filter by AllahsAvatar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just got an email from Microsoft support. This was included:

      Please note, since this support request will be handled using Microsoft's e-mail support option, it is highly recommended you set your junk mail settings for the e-mail contact you listed in this case to accept e-mail from Microsoft.com. This will ensure our support e-mail reaches you in a timely m anner and prevent it from being moved to your junk mail folder.

      Apparently a lot of people block @microsoft.com entirely.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back, one year!
    2. Re:Email filter by mibus · · Score: 1

      Apparently a lot of people block @microsoft.com entirely.

      More likely, a lot of people have poorly-configured spam filters.

      I'm not kidding. We send out lots of email (web forum stuff, email newsletters, etc) and a huge amount of that gets silently dropped or put in Junk folders.

  17. Leveredge by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously folks, what if a popular product like FF decided to drag feet on supporting a new MS product. Pretend we're talking a year from now and MS is trying to roll out Vista and the 40% of the population that will be using FF by then balks because FF won't run properly. Extremely unlikely but an interresting though nontheless expecially when you recall the days when MS would break competitors apps running on Windows.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Leveredge by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft would quickly publicize it. I'm imagining the following:

      "Look, folks, we were willing to bend over backwards to make this work, and they wouldn't budge to do something that would benefit the end user! Do you want software that runs your business to be controlled by people who make childish decisions like this?"

      But hey, if that plays out great in your mind, by all means keep dreaming of sticking it to The Man.

    2. Re:Leveredge by jkabbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretend we're talking a year from now and MS is trying to roll out Vista and the 40% of the population that will be using FF by then balks because FF won't run properly.

      It may not be a representative sample, but all of the big corporations I have worked at or visited seem wedded to IE. Since corporations are going to be the slow movers on the Vista transition I think it's unlikely to be the explanation. Keep in mind, consumers are going to get Vista shoved down their throats because that's what will come installed on new machines.

      The more likely reason is anti-trust. Microsoft is finally getting some serious competition again in the browser arena. Microsoft will have a tough time explaining things if Vista comes out and Firefox, the arch-rival to IE, doesn't work. Microsoft long ago lost the benefit of the doubt with respect to anti-trust regulators.

      The benefits far outweigh the costs of helping the Firefox team out for a few days. In other words: CYA.

  18. Vista modularity? by stites · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Vista is written modularly and has a clean, well documented API then why would an application development team need any help from the Vista development team to get their application working on Vista?

    --------------------
    Steve Stites

    1. Re:Vista modularity? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      There's a simple explanation: it's probably NOT working well, and they want to have a heads-up on what kinda complaint level they'll have. OR, they want to make sure to "break" certain firefox features so that IE looks better.

      --
      stuff |
    2. Re:Vista modularity? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Well, there are a couple of things. First, they probably want to make sure it works well and can integrate correctly (being a default browser and such, they may have changed that API). But they also want to make sure it doesn't trigger any bugs. This may include avoiding known bugs, or finding new ones. What if FireFox was written correctly but happened to trigger some obscure bug that would cause your network connection to get dropped or stalled whenever you looked at a page over 100k or something like that.

      It's important to find bugs that aren't triggerable yet. It's MORE important to find bugs that ARE triggerable.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Vista modularity? by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      What you're implying is that if something is written modularly and is well documented, no skilled programmer would ever need to ask questions about it?

      That arguement breaks down the first time someone asks about Linux or Mac.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    4. Re:Vista modularity? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Informative

      For a complex enough project (which I'd argue Firefox is), even with a clean, well documented API, there will always be plenty of questions that can be answered better and/or faster by just asking the developers of the API. You can try to anticipate all possible questions in writing API documentation, but you'll never quite get there.

    5. Re:Vista modularity? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I think you answered your own question.

    6. Re:Vista modularity? by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Vista is written modularly and has a clean, well documented API

      Sorry, I've lost you there.

    7. Re:Vista modularity? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a simple explanation: it's probably NOT working well, and they want to have a heads-up on what kinda complaint level they'll have. OR, they want to make sure to "break" certain firefox features so that IE looks better.

      This is possible, but I don't think it is likely. I suspect the issue is slightly different. Vista's biggest competitor is going to be earlier versions of Windows. Many corporate customers are still using Win2K and many are also using Firefox. Why would they upgrade?

      The Firefox crew is pretty sharp but they are techno-junkies. So MS invites the Firefox guys to see some of the whizbang new features of Vista that they can integrate with Firefox to make it better. Maybe they can even get these guys excited about the potential of something. The hope is that the Firefox people will add some feature that will motivate people to want to upgrade to Vista. Even if they just get a feature built into the core tree, maybe the older versions will become unsupported more quickly and for security reasons people will need to move to Vista to have a secure browser.

      Remember, MS does not sell IE. They sell a bundle of IE and Windows. Every Firefox user on Windows has already paid them for IE, so using Firefox does not really cost them anything other than a minor strategic bump right now. People not upgrading to Vista costs them hard cash, plus a number of strategic bumps when they don't adopt all the new lock-in anti-features in Vista.

    8. Re:Vista modularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about.

    9. Re:Vista modularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odds are, their fist questions are

      "What is Linux?"

      and

      "Why are Macs so expensive?"

    10. Re:Vista modularity? by f1055man · · Score: 1

      "if Vista is written modularly and has a clean, well documented API..." Am I the only one that finds this comment +1 funny?

    11. Re:Vista modularity? by garaged · · Score: 1

      you already gave the answer

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    12. Re:Vista modularity? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
      Two reasons, OTTOMH:
      • DRM support
      • support for Microsoft's CA for plain ol' SSL certs
      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    13. Re:Vista modularity? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be nice if the purpose of the meeting was about tight integration of firefox as a fall back to IE 8, since they will be behind in IE7 and more so with IE8.

      Well, one can at least hope they concede on some app for the betterment of mankind...

    14. Re:Vista modularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's real funny... have you ever been to MSDN? It probably has more documentation than the major open source projects have code. I doubt any open source project will approach that level of documentation (for the API or the interface) any time soon, but they should be focusing on making features work in a usable way anyways.

    15. Re:Vista modularity? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I know of very few projects that has the level of documentation provided by MSDN. The only one that comes to mind is Sun's Java API reference, though I'm sure there are others. The internals of the Linux kernel, by point of comparison, often have no documentation besides the source itself.

    16. Re:Vista modularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when people use IE, the default search engine is Microsoft's, and Microsoft makes money from ads on that site. If people use Firefox, Mozilla and Google make money. Not cool for M$

  19. One does not simply walk into Redmond! by w33t · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's Bill Gates is gaurded by more than just Orcs. There is evil there that does not sleep, and the Great WGA is ever watchful. It is a barren wasteland riddled with fire, ash, and Starbucks coffee, the very air you breathe is a poisonous fume. Not with ten thousand could you do this. It is folley.

    1. Re:One does not simply walk into Redmond! by Markzilla · · Score: 0

      I skimmed the replies looking for this exact one. Nicely done!

    2. Re:One does not simply walk into Redmond! by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I say to you what I said to Gandalf - just give to the Eagles and let them drop it in the damned volcano! But does anyone listen? Nooooooo.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  20. Nice knowing you guys by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    They are gonna strap these guys down as soon as they get through the doors and feed them "the koolaid", and they will never be the same again. Pity, they were part of an interesting project. Bye bye.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Nice knowing you guys by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are gonna strap these guys down as soon as they get through the doors and feed them "the koolaid", and they will never be the same again. Pity, they were part of an interesting project. Bye bye.

      What -would- happen if MS offered them a $500k a year job to work on IE?... with a condition not to work on Firefox anymore.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:Nice knowing you guys by constantnormal · · Score: 1

      Why so little?

      It seems to me that a cool million a year, with ALL taxes on that million paid by Microsoft, and an employment contract that guarantees payment for 5 years, even if they are fired or quit (excuse me, "retire") the day after they arrive.

      That's still not as nice a deal as most corporate CEOs get in US corporations, and it would only cost Microsoft $20M -- or about 1670 minutes* of profits. A bit over one day's profits.

      Everyone has their price.

      *based on 1440 minutes/day x 365.25 days/year, and $12,599,000,000 in profits for 2006, and the assumption that integrating the cascading series of tax payments results in a doubling of the $20M to a $40 expense for Microsoft.

    3. Re:Nice knowing you guys by isorox · · Score: 1

      *based on 1440 minutes/day x 365.25 days/year, and $12,599,000,000 in profits for 2006,

      Ahh, the usual precision problem. There are 365 days in 2005 (I assume you mean 05, as 06 isn't over). If you mean 04, there are 366 days. On average there are 365.2425 calendar days in a calendar year, ignoring leap seconds, however in any given year there are a whole number of days.

  21. if it is a trap by atarione · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it is the kinda trap were they offer to give you butt loads of money to come work for them instead.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  22. embrace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Embrace? As in embrace, extend, and extinguish?

    Embrace? As in kiss-o-death? (see vinnie reference)

    Or what?

  23. This just struck me as odd... by Benanov · · Score: 1

    I love the part about the @microsoft.com email filter. Is someone paranoid or what?

    1. Re:This just struck me as odd... by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, you don't think they read the comments here? Given the attitude, I'd probably think the same thing too if i were in their place.

    2. Re:This just struck me as odd... by vain+gloria · · Score: 1
      I love the part about the @microsoft.com email filter. Is someone paranoid or what?

      The whole thing is a PR exercise for MS. Seen in that light, finding a weak excuse to make the offer publicly makes perfect sense. Harder for the Mozilla devs to turn down too.
    3. Re:This just struck me as odd... by jchoyt · · Score: 1

      I think that someone is you. The microsoft.com filter was a self-effacing joke.

      --
      Sometimes the truth is arrived at by adding all the little lies together and deducting them from all that is known.
    4. Re:This just struck me as odd... by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of spam is being sent with forged from as @microsoft.com. I could imagine a linux kernel developer going 'hmm it's not like anyone is ever going to mail me from there...' and blocking all those.

  24. Careful of the Kool-Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you do, guys, do not drink the Kool-Aid!

  25. Laugh at their problems... by Ougarou · · Score: 1
    some 1:1 support in getting Firefox and Thunderbird to run on Vista.
    Hahaha, if they need 1:1 support, it's probably harder then just posting a bug report or using IRC.
    My 2 cents: Even if you guys never get it to work on Vista, I'll probably never stop enjoying Firefox because I'll probably never start using Vista.
    Make sure you get free food without selling your soul and enjoy!
  26. Autopsies of the developers show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Acute Chair Deceleration to the Head syndrome.

  27. Living in Dreamland by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pretend we're talking a year from now and MS is trying to roll out Vista and the 40% of the population that will be using FF by then balks because FF won't run properly.

    Wow - food must taste better where you live too!

    1. Re:Living in Dreamland by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not the food, is the fact it's being served by happy gnomes dressed in all the colours of the rainbow.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    2. Re:Living in Dreamland by MarkByers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pretend we're talking a year from now and MS is trying to roll out Vista...

      Wow - food must taste better where you live too!

      Nah... I don't think it's that unrealistic that Vista will be almost ready next year.

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
  28. Keep Your Friends Close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...keep your enemies closer.

  29. Maybe so but, by TheOldSchooler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Guess what will be on the private plane that flies them to Redmond.

    1. Re:Maybe so but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SNAKES!

    2. Re:Maybe so but, by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1
      --
      what sig?
    3. Re:Maybe so but, by amliebsch · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, worse: Chairs.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    4. Re:Maybe so but, by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see you fly around the US without something to sit on...

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    5. Re:Maybe so but, by MassEnergySpaceTime · · Score: 1

      An inflight movie that is a loop of some bald guy on stage repeating one word:

      "Developers, developers, developers, developers..."

      --
      Respect the laws of physics, for the laws of physics have no respect for you.
    6. Re:Maybe so but, by Chonine · · Score: 1

      I've had it with these Moth*#@!$! chair jokes, on this Moth##$%!$#@!^ Slashdot!

    7. Re:Maybe so but, by kchrist · · Score: 1

      iPods and hair gel?

  30. Arriving in Redmond .... by B2382F29 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

    --
    Move Sig. For great justice.
    1. Re:Arriving in Redmond .... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      MSMUD Clippy says:

      At the far North you see a tower with a faint light in it,
      the ogre is coming towards you,
      (F)lee or (F)ight ?

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    2. Re:Arriving in Redmond .... by smitingpurpleemu · · Score: 1

      Oh no! You have wandered into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!

  31. -50 ultraredudant by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Resistance is futile, your browser will be assimilated

  32. Ok ok... by Yankovic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to get too serious here, but this is a perfect example of a situation where MS can't win. Invite the folks up? "It's a trap! They'll steal your code, kill you, etc." Don't invite them up? "When is MS going to treat OSS developers like any one else, Firefox has many users, they should get the same respect as any other org."

    Ah slashdot... can't live with it, pass the beer nuts.

    1. Re:Ok ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about letting them see iexplorer code so they become 'tainted' afaiunst working on open source project

    2. Re:Ok ok... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1, Insightful

      *sigh*

      You have to be rather stupid if you think those posters, with some obvious exceptions, really think MS will have a bonecrushing mafia guy waiting in the parking lot...

      This story act like a collectively recognized cue for making MS vs. Mozilla jokes, same with other topics that appeare at regular intervals. If you look at the (albeit few) serious post they are rather less focused on the part of it being a supposed trap.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    3. Re:Ok ok... by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would really be a shame if Microsoft stole the code for Firefox. I mean, since it is top-secret and everything.

      :)

      --
      R.Mo
    4. Re:Ok ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a perfect example of people who don't understand the meaning of the words "joke" and "sarcasm."

      Posts like this should auto-mod to 0 for trying to play to the anti-opinion crowd.

    5. Re:Ok ok... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      You might investigate what the word "joke" means. I think even Microsoft gets them. Not sure how you manage in life without understanding the concept.

      If you have not figured it out, this is all very good for Microsoft. I think they should be very happy with the high level of jokes here. If Microsoft truly turned around and stopped acting hostile to everybody else in the world, the number of jokes would probably skyrocket, they may even make them themselves.

    6. Re:Ok ok... by kinglink · · Score: 1

      A well done comment capped off by a cheers quote. And if that's not enough it's a Norm quote. Who doesn't like the big guy?

    7. Re:Ok ok... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to get too serious here, but this is a perfect example of a situation where MS can't win. Invite the folks up? "It's a trap! They'll steal your code, kill you, etc." Don't invite them up? "When is MS going to treat OSS developers like any one else, Firefox has many users, they should get the same respect as any other org."

      Not to make a bad analogy here, but let me present a perfect example of a situation where J. Dahmer can't win. Find the body of a missing person in his apartment? "He's raping the dead." Don't find a missing body in his apartment? "He probably ate it and dissolved the bones in those acid vats."

      The solution to this dilemma is don't spend more than a decade gaining notoriety by constantly screwing people over, breaking the law, and behaving unethically. People suspect the worst of MS, because MS delivers on a regular basis. That's not prejudice, it's experience.

    8. Re:Ok ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using that reasoning, I can fairly state that OSS will never gain wide acceptance because its community consists of a bunch of pompus elitist assholes.

    9. Re:Ok ok... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Using that reasoning, I can fairly state that OSS will never gain wide acceptance because its community consists of a bunch of pompus elitist assholes.

      This is the logical fallacy, "Non sequitur." You've failed to demonstrate any flaw in the reasoning or analogy, but instead have simply presented an unsupported belief and an ad hominem attack to boot. Please read a book on reasoning, logic, or critical thinking and come back when you can support some of your illogical opinions.

    10. Re:Ok ok... by dedazo · · Score: 1
      Not to make a bad analogy here

      It appears that you fell asleep when your logic teacher was trying to explain the concept of fallacies of involved assumptions, better known in logic circles as Petitio Principii. Eg: Microsoft did X yesterday and Y the day before - therefore they will do Z tomorrow. Whoosh. Dahmer was also not a murderer the day before he first murdered someone, mmm? And of course your analogy is a classic example of the poisoning the well fallacy, in which you draw a comparison to an emotionally charged subject that cannot be dismissed as false because it's based on well-known previous, observable events.

      Trust me, you impress no one with your "Mr. Logic" arguments. Stick to the "microsoft is evil because I say so" mantra and you'll be OK.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    11. Re:Ok ok... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      It appears that you fell asleep when your logic teacher was trying to explain the concept of fallacies of involved assumptions, better known in logic circles as Petitio Principii. Eg: Microsoft did X yesterday and Y the day before - therefore they will do Z tomorrow.

      I did not say that Microsoft will do something bad tomorrow. I said it is reasonable for people to suspect that they will and illogical to ignore past experience as a possible indicator of future behavior. You seem to have misinterpreted the meaning of said fallacy. It certainly does not preclude the above.

      Dahmer was also not a murderer the day before he first murdered someone, mmm?

      No, but knowing that he has consistently been murdering people, raping the corpses, and eating them for years makes it reasonable to suspect him when people disappear.

      And of course your analogy is a classic example of the poisoning the well fallacy, in which you draw a comparison to an emotionally charged subject that cannot be dismissed as false because it's based on well-known previous, observable events.

      Poisoning the well is when you appeal to emotion. I was simply providing a simplified analogy using Dahmer as an easily recognizable criminal to represent MS's criminal actions. I made no appeals to emotion in so doing. I suppose someone could view this historical person in a very emotional way, but I don't expect most people will.

      Maybe you should go hit the books again. MS's consistent criminal behavior over the past decade does not in any way prove that they will commit similar criminal acts in the future, but it does imply that this is a reasonable, possible danger. To expect everyone to ignore all their past experience with the company and suddenly give them the benefit of the doubt is both foolish and illogical.

    12. Re:Ok ok... by dedazo · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good. What I said was that you need to stop pretending you're making a "logical" argument when you are obviously not. The main fallacy here is your argumentative presumption based on "feeling". That's it. As far as I'm concerned you can play tarot card reader all day and tell us what Microsoft will be doing next Tuesday - just don't try to pass it as logic.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    13. Re:Ok ok... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good. What I said was that you need to stop pretending you're making a "logical" argument when you are obviously not.

      You've failed to show how using past behavior as a possible indicator of future behavior is illogical.

      The main fallacy here is your argumentative presumption based on "feeling".

      Feeling? What emotive arguments have I made? This is objective analysis, not feeling.

      As far as I'm concerned you can play tarot card reader all day and tell us what Microsoft will be doing next Tuesday - just don't try to pass it as logic.

      Perhaps you missed the memo, but structured logic in the form of the scientific method has used predictors for hundreds of years. It is not logical to say that because the sun came up yesterday it will today. It is logical to say that because the sun has come up every day for years, it is reasonable to deduce it is likely it will come up tomorrow, barring strong evidence to the contrary. There is nothing emotive or illogical about that. Statistics and probability can determine the probability of certain future events in exacting detail. That does not make them illogical.

    14. Re:Ok ok... by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Look, statistics != logic. There is no such thing as "reasonable" in logic. Do you understand that? Go read your MacKay again and pay special attention to the logical indeterminism of choice and the problem of propositional logic. Then go play with your Linux boxen or something.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    15. Re:Ok ok... by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

      Score: -1 pedantic.

      Despite your "shimmering brilliance" if I am at the beach and hear someone holler "Sharks!" and see triangular dorsal fins headed my way, I'm getting out of the water. Now, the people doing the warning could be wrong. Perhaps the sharks just want to frolic like dolphins. Your logical acumen notwithstanding, I'm getting out of the water ... real fast. Feel free to heed your own analysis and stay in, though.

      Welcome to the court of public opinion.

      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    16. Re:Ok ok... by dedazo · · Score: 1
      Welcome to the court of public opinion.

      Does "court of public opinion" mean "surrounded by morons who use terminology they don't really understand and are afflicted by a lack of basic comprehension"? If that's the case then I totally agree. My "acumen" notwithstanding, I do have the capacity to differentiate between a simple "this is what I think" argument advanced by someone with an obvious predisposition of opinion, and a formal logical proposition.

      Now this might seem "pedantic" to you my dear slashbot, but then I never suggested the OP was right or wrong in his argument about the topic at hand. Only that his use of logical terms is slightly retarded at best, which coupled with that annoying "let me tell you how it is" tone was just begging for some correction. Court of public opinion and all that.

      Oh, and thanks for the shark example. It was stupid and proves you have no idea what you're talking about, but hilarious.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    17. Re:Ok ok... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Look, statistics != logic.

      I never suggested it was, however statistics is a logical procedure and does not violate any of the rules of logic.

      Go read your MacKay again and pay special attention to the logical indeterminism of choice and the problem of propositional logic.

      You've strongly implied in your posts that you think that I have presented a logical fallacy, but all of your attempts to name a specific one have been either misinterpretations of the rules of logic, or misinterpretations of my statements. You've hinted that prediction is inherently illogical. Statistics is a counter example that I was hoping you'd be able to grok. Sadly, you've instead decided to once again avoid my statements and argue against an interpretation of what I wrote that is so strained it verges on being a strawman.

      As an aside, your arguments in this thread where you write, "coupled with that annoying 'let me tell you how it is' tone" shortly followed by, "Oh, and thanks for the shark example. It was stupid and proves you have no idea what you're talking about..." Is both funny and sad. Healer, heal thyself.

    18. Re:Ok ok... by KwKSilver · · Score: 1
      My, my ... How sensitive and easily hurt your feelings are, Mr Logic.

      Tell us Mr. Logic, what form of argument this is:
      "surrounded by morons who use terminology they don't really understand and are afflicted by a lack of basic comprehension"?
      Is that an argument or were you just whining? How about
      retarded at best,
      Ad hominem and all that.

      What's the difference between his alleged tone which you describe as
      that annoying "let me tell you how it is" tone
      and yours? You know the one that was just begging for correction. Come now, dazzle us with some more of the cold brilliance of your perfect logic.

      One more thing ... if you want to swim with sharks to prove your notions, we have plenty here in Florida. If you really want to impress us, try it with a raw T-bone hung around your logical neck.
      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  33. I can't stop laughing by volpone · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...at the fact that so many of us read the summary and ALL thought, "It's a trap!" I'm talking tears-in-my-eyes laughing.


    Now I'm going to have Admiral Ackbar's quote in my head all day.

  34. Gecko based IExplorer? by vhogemann · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What if they're thinking anbout replacing the IE render engine with Geko + ActiveX extensions?

    It's not an insane idea, a browser it's not a key factor for desktop dominance anymore... and MS could use the resources allocated for IE on another projects.

    And also, they eliminate the "Firefox" treat... Firefox is avaliable for MacOSX, Linux, BSD, and others. If someone uses it under Windows, they can feel more confortable to swich to another OS since their applications are there too.

    --
    ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    1. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never. Too much NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome for that. I think one of the other posters is right. FireFox is getting popular and if it doesn't work with Vista (either intentionally or not) they will get tons of complaints ("Vista broke my InternetFox thing", "They are trying to crush FireFox", etc.). FireFox is so popular that they have to make sure it works. The only difference between it and some other program they'll do that for (Sims/Sim 2) is that FireFox is FOSS so we hear about it (where they have done this with Sims/Sims 2 and we don't hear a peep).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Well, the resources on the IE layout system are already paid for. It been years, its in beta, I think the heavy lifting is over with. Besides, the layout engine in Moz isnt a HTML layout engine, but a XML layout engine, with specific support for (x)html, and xul/xbl, out of the box. Microsoft now has xaml; if they are even half way smart in their engineering then the IE engine is also not a HTML layout engine, but an XML layout engine with specific support for (x)html, and xaml. Under this scenario, throwing away the IE engine would mean throwing away the specific support for xaml, and having to rewrite that specific support for Gecko.

    3. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by nuzak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > What if they're thinking anbout replacing the IE render engine with Geko + ActiveX extensions?

      Absolutely never ever ever going to happen. Even discounting the IE features that MS wants to keep, even discounting NIH syndrome, Microsoft owns the IE codebase (modulo a few patent trolls). Microsoft doesn't want to put anything in Windows that it can't alter at will. Yes Gecko's open source, but they don't exactly want to fork it and deal with the developer relations donnybrook that would ensue.

      As for ActiveX, MS had already removed almost every AX control from its site, leaving only various update managers. And the Eolas debacle has pretty much tilted them all the way toward going 100% DHTML/AJAX for rich content. Underneath, it's still COM controls, sure -- Flash and even the Java "plugin" are actually ActiveX controls -- but anyone still beating on the ActiveX drum is showing they have no imagination with which to update their repertoire of trolling.

      Firefox is big and important enough now that some folks at Microsoft want more familiarity, including making sure it doesn't break on Vista, because depending on how it breaks, it can make Vista appear broken itself (or yes, reveal where it actually is broken). The speculation you're reading about "traps" is just the usual grist for the Two-Minute Hate around here.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by dwandy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Too much NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome for that.
      ...and here I thought "not invented here" was the business model in redmond?

      embrace, extend, extinguish ...repeat as necessary.

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    5. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "... anyone still beating on the ActiveX drum is showing they have no imagination with which to update their repertoire of trolling."

      Sorry, but you are quite wrong, either intentionally or by just not thinking this through. You are using one narrow example (microsoft.com's current site practices) and somehow drawing the conclusion that ActiveX is no longer a concern internet-wide. This is totally incorrect.

      Here's a quick example. We have a small, (unfortunately) somewhat autonomous group of people here that insist on using Microsoft's products Movie Maker and Producer to push out video of a colloquium that occurs every few weeks during the school year. The web page they end up with makes massive use of ActiveX - which of course means not only that it's IE+Windows only (yes, it claims not to be but it only works on IE+Windows), but also that anyone who uses IE with Active X turned off (e.g. all XP SP2 users) are badgered with popup after popup asking "Do you want to enable scripting?" Eventually many of these folks get tired of the popups and just turn scripting on across the board so they can watch the d*mn video.

      If you've read the IT trade press at all, you'll be familiar with interview after interview where CIOs have said "We'd love to move to Firefox, but we've got too much invested in intranet/extranet systems based on ActiveX technology".

      ActiveX will continue to be an issue until Microsoft stops selling tools that generate ActiveX-based code and end-products.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by colmore · · Score: 1

      I think the traps are more just about letting us exercise geek humor, which just means quoting something geeks recognize.

      Giving slashdot some credit, I think people are generally aware that microsoft looks at a product (even a competing product) with millions of dedicated users and can see that if they break compatibility, it'll mean egg on their face.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    7. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by kensai · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just put that site in their Trusted Sites list to avoid all the popups?

    8. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "Couldn't they just put that site in their Trusted Sites list to avoid all the popups?"

      I assume this would work - but my experience has been this isn't what they do (they don't come and ask me about this sort of thing; I find out about it after-the-fact once something has gone awry). So I would hazard a guess that, to the non-technically-oriented end user, adding a single site to the "trusted" list is not the most obvious option that presents itself to them.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Gecko based IExplorer? by markhb · · Score: 1
      If you've read the IT trade press at all, you'll be familiar with interview after interview where CIOs have said "We'd love to move to Firefox, but we've got too much invested in intranet/extranet systems based on ActiveX technology".


      A lot of that is consultingware-type stuff, the big ERP and CRM products like SAP and others. They "web-enabled" their fat-client applications by turning them into gigantic ActiveX controls, leveraging the built-in automatic distribution the http platform provides to solve the "How do we get this app to all our desktops" question while retaining all the features of fully-native software, all without having to rewrite the entire GUI system in Java.
      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  35. Interesting by olddotter · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is a sign of things to come after the management shake up of sorts at Microsoft?

    Mozilla has a enough hype around it that it would be a benefit to Microsoft to say vista supports it. Helping OSS also takes a little of the anti-trust preasure off of them around the world.

  36. That's It for Mozilla Then... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The coders that went there have very likely seen some code that is currently "open" but will eventually be closed. And it's very likely it will influence the way they code on Firefox and Seamonkey. So I expect that a few years from now MS legal will come-a-callin' and do what SCO did only they will succeed because they have more money. Smart move there Einteins. This is why it is absolutely imperatif that no one in the FOSS camp ever agrees to look at code that is proprietary. As soon as you do, you're damaged goods.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:That's It for Mozilla Then... by mind21_98 · · Score: 1

      ...this also means that FOSS people really shouldn't develop proprietary software, which is impractical IMHO. What are you going to do, open your project only to people who code as a hobby (and not as a career)?

  37. But it already works by MartijnL · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what the point is. Firefox installs on Vista beta so even without this visit and program tweaks it works.

    1. Re:But it already works by Blikkie · · Score: 1

      It may work already right now, but there may be tweaks or optimizations that have to be turned off, or maybe there is a more efficient way to put things through to the windows rendering system. As they said there will be IE7 engineers as well, so if one party learns something from the other it is time well spent. The FF engineers will be smart enough to retain platform compatibility with all the other platforms anyhow.

    2. Re:But it already works by et764 · · Score: 1

      But Firefox doesn't quite integrate as well with Vista as it could. For one, Firefox doesn't seem to be aware of the way Vista can scale fonts based on your monitor's DPI.

  38. Hahaahaha by Ramirozz · · Score: 1

    After the meeting, check for a chip in the back of their necks.

    --
    http://www.quasarcr.com/
  39. I hope at least one of them... by geobeck · · Score: 0

    ...takes a Hattori Hanzo sword, and has mastered Pai Mei's five-point exploding heart technique.

    ...and is cast as a hot blonde for the 'documentary'.

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  40. Acknowledging Firefox's Popularity by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems to me that MS is finally acknowledging Firefox's popularity.


    What I never understood is the whole browser wars thing, how does MS make money off IE? It's free to download. I guess this signals the end of the browser wars, with both sides sitting down to work together(interesting indeed).

    Maybe they realize that Firefox is a good product and IE isn't actually making them any money so why not support Firefox.

    Or maybe it's just a PR stunt in light of all the recent Vista scare stuff. They wanted us to see it; I'm sure they could have contacted mozilla somehow without the public knowing. The fact is they want us to see this for some reason.

    1. Re:Acknowledging Firefox's Popularity by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      What I never understood is the whole browser wars thing, how does MS make money off IE? It's free to download. I guess this signals the end of the browser wars, with both sides sitting down to work together(interesting indeed).
      It's kinda like a loss-leader, not that people buy Windows for IE, but it's just another Microsoft product so that people keep Microsoft in their minds when they think of software. I don't think this is really a sign of the end of the browser wars, I think this is Microsoft trying to get to know their enemy. People who switch from IE to Firefox are likely to switch from Outlook to Thunderbird and MS Office to OpenOffice, and are then more likely than other people to switch from Windows to Linux. Microsoft doesn't like that, so you can bet that whatever they're doing is not good for Firefox.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    2. Re:Acknowledging Firefox's Popularity by n8k99 · · Score: 1

      Internet Explorer is a loss leader. Microsoft is a software company and they have invested heavily into positioning this application. Maintaining that position does not directly create revenue, however it does act as a pretty good indicator of the market's attitude towards Microsoft as a company. As IE has been losing ground, Microsoft has also been losing more ground in other areas. It may be difficult to prove that the market share of people using IE is directly related to the number of people who decide to change to new software for their Office Suite, or even Operating System. But if these people see that there is something else which is "the new hotness" on the rise and IE is the old has been, who is to say that these people will not also find themselves more enlightened towards other choices in software. This visit may be to shore up their image, or it could actually be a change in internal philosophy, we may not actually know what is happening in the situation for a long time.

      --
      For some reason my fountain pen doesn't work here.
    3. Re:Acknowledging Firefox's Popularity by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just a loss-leader, it's also about control. If MS can control the application that most users browse the Internet with, that gives them a lot of leverage to embrace and extend. They can enforce their own proprietary standards (with IIS and so on), and lock out everyone else.

    4. Re:Acknowledging Firefox's Popularity by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      What I never understood is the whole browser wars thing, how does MS make money off IE? It's free to download.

      IE sells windows licenses. No, really--stop laughing, it's true.

      For every IE only corporate application out there, there's infrastructure that HAS to run Windows. Your application servers need to be windows based. Your fat clients need to be windows based. Even in a thin client environment, your terminal server HAS to be windows based.

      All that means revenue for MS.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:Acknowledging Firefox's Popularity by jejones · · Score: 1

      What I never understood is the whole browser wars thing, how does MS make money off IE?

      They don't, directly, but browser dominance, combined with not conforming to w3 standards, maintains the applications barrier to entry.

      (A while back there was someone who was pushing Mozilla to add XP-specific features. Do you suppose they're going to try that again, this time for Vista?)

  41. isn't this going to be.... by arsenix · · Score: 1


        Just like the opening scene in braveheart.

    james

    --
    (this is offended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:isn't this going to be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

  42. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ballmer paraphrase...

    "I'm going to fucking bury those guys, I have done it before, and I will do it again, I'm going to fucking kill Mozilla."

  43. Doesn't this make sense by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Mozilla is a large project maintained by a number of smart guys, job offers and trying to understand what they're thinking and where they're going is useful to MS.

    Also if there are problem with Mozilla applications running properly on Vista, it is a problem for MS. Not that MS should care about Mozilla specifically, but if it doesn't work, a lot of other software won't either.

  44. Tickled pink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, I clicked on this stupid tickle ad on a site for IT people, so I figured it was safe. Now I have a bunch of badware on my computer.

    Oh, wait, that's right, I'm not that stupid. But the people running /. obviously have no ethics.

    1. Re:Tickled pink by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can thank the people who made your browser and those who made your OS (whichever they happen to be) for making that possible. Oh, and yourself for using them.

    2. Re:Tickled pink by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1
      So, I clicked on this stupid tickle ad on a site for IT people, so I figured it was safe. Now I have a bunch of badware on my computer.

      Oh, wait, that's right, I'm not that stupid.

      So... why'd you click it, exactly?

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
  45. Is this a trick? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Is this a trick, a ploy to start a war?

    No, and no. Four questions left.

    I only asked five questions.

    Is it a trick? Is it a ploy to start a war. Those are separate questions.


    I find it strange that Microsoft would invite these folks over. What, suddenly they want to interoperate with everything?

  46. you can bet the lawyers aren't invited by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Watch what you SIGN and SAY because there's little proof anything good will come of this. And I doubt Microsoft is wanting to help the stepchild of the company(Netscape) whom Steve Balmer said, "kill the baby" to.

    Nothing good can come of this so send the lawyers instead.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:you can bet the lawyers aren't invited by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think "kill the baby" was in reference to the MS settlement with Apple, where they wanted Apple to stop developing QuickTime. Fortunately, Apple (probably Jobs) said "No", likely in more syllables.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    2. Re:you can bet the lawyers aren't invited by Locutus · · Score: 1

      My mistake, thank you for pointing this out. Here's the link I found verifying this:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/long term/microsoft/stories/1998/microsoft110698.htm

      It was the DOJ vs MSFT case regarding Netscape/Internet browser but the quote was regarding Apple Quicktime and not Navigator. Too many Microsoft "kill" quotes to get them straight. ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  47. Sad. by sethadam1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is sad. This comment is not a troll, not a flamebait, just an observation.

    Microsoft has taken some serious steps to clean itself up over the last year or so. As a Linux/Apache/PHP/Python/Perl/MySQL/Postgres evangelist, I always root for open source, but I respect Microsoft's omnipresence in the tech world.

    That said, it's really sad to see that 98% of the comments here are based on distrust, hatred, and bad jokes. This is a huge move: Microsoft, for once, finally understanding that open source has a place and that NOT working with them spells trouble for them.

    So, please people, retire the lame wisecracks. This is one of many times you'll see Microsoft bent by the immense power and will of open source!

    1. Re:Sad. by mormop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To a certain extent Microsoft only have themselves to blame. After 15 odd years of bad behaviour and general skullduggery it takes a lot of effort and time to convince people you are actions are genuine.

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    2. Re:Sad. by someone1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you should learn the tale about the scorpion and the turtle. Sad indeed.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    3. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wisecracks stop when I can buy a laptop without
      an OS.

    4. Re:Sad. by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, 100%.

      But it should be said, Microsoft has earned much of the distrust it receives.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    5. Re:Sad. by jejones · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has earned that distrust and hatred over the decades through diligent work. What reason is there to suppose that they've changed their nature now?

    6. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silence, infidel!

    7. Re:Sad. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft has taken some serious steps to clean itself up over the last year or so.

      Really? You mean they are no longer illegally bundling IE? Oh yeah they still are. You mean they are no longer paying companies to spread FUD about security and performance? Oh, they're still doing that too. So they are not misleading people by overstating the security of Vista and the compliance of IE? Oh, they did that too. Well surely they aren't still illegally bundling their media player? Huh, they're doing that too. Have they stopped illegally tying their server and desktop to take over more of the server space with an inferior product? No, they are still doing that as well. How exactly have they "cleaned up?"

      That said, it's really sad to see that 98% of the comments here are based on distrust, hatred, and bad jokes.

      Trust is earned. After the fiftieth or sixtieth time someone punches me the kidneys when I'm looking the other way, it is not sad that I talk about how I suspect they might be trying again. If MS wants my trust they have to earn it and it will take years of ethical, trustworthy behavior before I'm willing to admit that this time they might not be maneuvering for another cheap, sucker punch. Not punching me when I'm looking right at them and a cop is paying attention does not earn them any trust.

      This is one of many times you'll see Microsoft bent by the immense power and will of open source!

      This is MS looking out for their bottom dollar, probably by trying to get new "Vista only" feature into Firefox to help motivate corporate upgrades either by selling that feature or by hoping it will hasten the demise of mainstream support for Firefox on old versions of Windows. Does this make me trust MS to any greater degree? Hell no, and nor should it.

    8. Re:Sad. by MasterKlaus · · Score: 1
      ... it's really sad to see that 98% of the comments here are based on distrust, hatred, and bad jokes. This is a huge move: Microsoft, for once, finally understanding that open source has a place and that NOT working with them spells trouble for them.
      It's slashdot! 98% of ALL comments on ALL articles are based on distrust, hatred, and bad jokes. That doesn't mean that we mean everything we say. And I do agree, it's a good idea for MS to work with third party/OSS devs. But... It's a trap!
    9. Re:Sad. by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      The wisecracks stop when I can buy a laptop without an OS.

      Well golly gee! If you visited slashdot, you would know this already.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    10. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a fucking microsoft apologist. Look at the company's history and tell me distrust, hatred, and bad jokes aren't justified.

    11. Re:Sad. by mqduck · · Score: 1

      "This is one of many times you'll see Microsoft bent by the immense power and will of open source!

      This is MS looking out for their bottom dollar"

      Just a note: that's precicely what it means for a corporation to be bent by the might of a competitor.

      --
      Property is theft.
    12. Re:Sad. by orangeacid · · Score: 1

      A tactful way of saying 'Microsoft is bent', I'll grant you :-)

    13. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean they are no longer illegally bundling IE? Oh yeah they still are. (...) Well surely they aren't still illegally bundling their media player? Huh, they're doing that too. (...)


      OMG! I installed Ubuntu last weekend and it came illegally bundled with FireFox and XMMS! How do I sue?!?!?

      And my mother's iBook! Can you believe Apple had the nerve to illegally bundle Safari and iTunes with that laptop?!?!?
    14. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft has taken some serious steps to clean itself up over the last year or so.

      Really? You mean they are no longer illegally bundling IE? Oh yeah they still are.

      Oh right, so Microsoft should ship out Vista without a browser at all? They should sell that as an additional package? Or does that mean Ubuntu is 'illegally' bundling Firefox with its OS? Is it ok to bundle a browser as long as it is open source?

      So they are not misleading people by overstating the security of Vista and the compliance of IE?

      Because no company has ever drummed up support for its product. It is easier to say a feature did not make it then to try and proclaim at the last minute that x, y, and z cool widgets made it into your program.

      Well surely they aren't still illegally bundling their media player?

      Say thing as IE.
    15. Re:Sad. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      OMG! I installed Ubuntu last weekend and it came illegally bundled with FireFox and XMMS! How do I sue?!?!?

      Please educate yourself. Bundling only breaks the capitalist system of economy when it is bundling something with a product that wields monopoly power in a different market. None of your examples do that and none of them are against the law. All of the examples I gave do that and are illegal.

    16. Re:Sad. by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Really? You mean they are no longer illegally bundling IE?

      No, Microsoft isn't illegally bundling IE. They're bundling IE, but not illegally. That hsi issue already went through the courts and Microsoft is still bundling IE should give you a clue that it's not illegal.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    17. Re:Sad. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 0

      Oh right, so Microsoft should ship out Vista without a browser at all? They should sell that as an additional package?

      Yes they should. Dell or Gateway or Sony or Lenovo are free to bundle a browser with Windows and a computer and a bunch of bananas if they want and sell them to you, but the decision legally must be theirs without any coercion or incentive to choose on anything other than quality and price. This benefits consumers and the market by letting each vendor choose and the market decide through competition (the reason capitalism works).

      Or does that mean Ubuntu is 'illegally' bundling Firefox with its OS? Is it ok to bundle a browser as long as it is open source?

      It is legal to bundle anything with anything so long as one of the items does not wield monopoly power in a different market. Ubuntu wields monopoly power in no market and neither does Firefox. Gateway wields no monopoly power and can bundle IE and Windows legally. Apple wields no monopoly power (probably) and can bundle Safari and OS X. For that matter, because they are open source it is unclear if Ubuntu or Firefox would ever be able to wield monopoly power unless a barrier to forking can be somehow created without violating the license.

      If the US courts did not enforce these laws in the past, Microsoft would not exist because IBM would have crushed them before they even got started.

      Because no company has ever drummed up support for its product. It is easier to say a feature did not make it then to try and proclaim at the last minute that x, y, and z cool widgets made it into your program.

      Vista is not "the most secure OS ever" and IE 7 is not "standards compliant." You can call it marketing if you want, but it is deceptive and I'm certainly not going to trust the word of a company that makes deceptive statements like this. Anyone who does is a fool.

      Say[sic] thing as IE.

      Yeah, a concept that they apparently don't teach in Econ 101 anymore. How is it that som many people on Slashdot can be so oblivious the concepts of monopolies and tying? How is it they then insist on making assertions without taking five minutes and educating themselves anyway?

    18. Re:Sad. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, Microsoft isn't illegally bundling IE. They're bundling IE, but not illegally. That hsi issue already went through the courts and Microsoft is still bundling IE should give you a clue that it's not illegal.

      If you bothered to follow the court decisions, it was ruled illegal, but after certain, huge, campaign contributions the courts decided not to do anything about stopping the illegal action as part of their remedy. You also might notice that since then, MS has settled out of court paying undisclosed sums to dozens of companies as a result of this behavior.

      It is illegal to bundle two products when one of them wields monopoly power in one market and the other is in a second market. This is basic antitrust law going back to the Sherman act and is, in fact, the first example of illegal antitrust behavior provided. Don't mistake not being stopped/punished for not being guilty.

    19. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're giving off that new hippy "down with the man" college student smell. Are you a freshmen or a sophomore?

    20. Re:Sad. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      You're giving off that new hippy "down with the man" college student smell. Are you a freshmen or a sophomore?

      I graduated from undergraduate school quite a long time ago. I don't think reprimanding someone for not spending five minutes with wikipedia to gain a basic understanding of the subject they decided to make inflammatory, flippant remarks about qualifies anyone as having a "down with the man" mentality. I don't think my co-workers and colleagues would characterize me as a "hippy" by any means.

      P.S. you're giving off that "I make wild assumptions based upon very little information" smell. Are you, perhaps, a troll as well as a coward?

  48. Commercial by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1
    From TFL (emphasis mine)
    As part of my mission as an advocate for open source applications on Windows, I've gotten spaces set aside at the Windows Vista Readiness ISV Lab. In the past the company has only invited commercial software developers to these labs. I'm committed to evolving our thinking beyond commercial companies to include open source projects, so I went to the non-trivial effort of getting slots for non-commercial open source projects.
    That's an interesting view of what 'commercial' means. It looks like, as far as Redomd is concerned, Open Source == Non Commercial. That really misunderstands what Open Source is all about.
    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:Commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Open Source == Non Commercial, then he wouldn't had to specify the "non-commercial" part, would he? Perhaps he's saying there are both commercial and non-commercial open source products?

  49. Cool!! by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    If you open IE7, type 'firefox sucks' into the address bar - then press the Windows key 4 times, followed by ctrl-alt-tab, the following message appears:

    "Help us - we've been kidnapped by Ballmer! They're making us write insecure code and not giving us enough caffeine!"

    Then you get to play a flight simulator game...

    [To anyone who tries this and complains about it not working - "you are an idiot"].

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Cool!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried it, it worked ! I first thought I was an idiot, but then I checked, and I've got IE 6, so it's not that. Any idea ?

    2. Re:Cool!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about the rest of it, but we get all the coffee and soft drinks we can drink here at MS. :P

    3. Re:Cool!! by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      Of course you do! Your one of the good boys and girls.

      Not like those dirty nasty smelly horrid mozilla developers - they get the 'chair'. (and no coffee) ;)

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  50. If you can't beat them... by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    If you can't beat them, join them?

  51. Firefox works with Vista by bunratty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aren't there already plenty of Firefox users who are using the latest Vista betas? If Firefox didn't work in Vista, there'd be lots of bug reports about it already.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    1. Re:Firefox works with Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure are. I'm posting this in Firefox running on Vista. And the Vista install is running in a VM under VMWare Server 2.0 on top of a Kubuntu host.

    2. Re:Firefox works with Vista by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Where did you get VMware Server 2?

    3. Re:Firefox works with Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which is yours?

  52. Rest of the quote by WillerZ · · Score: 1

    Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own.

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
  53. Posting with OE? by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 1

    I liked the fact that the first followup is repeated twice in the google archive. Maybe at MS they are still using OE to follow newsgroups...

    1. Re:Posting with OE? by mosinu · · Score: 1

      Actually, Click options on the post and view the original. You will be surprised.

  54. will they say please and thank you? by wardk · · Score: 1

    it's obvious MS needs help. we all know it. they have been in denial.

    so, invite some people who have experience making a web browser that isn't utter and complete garbage to find out some tips.

    like it's gonna matter, IE is destined to continue being what it has been. a boat anchor on a ship already laying on the bottom.

  55. I remember when Win2k code leaked....... by mormop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Open source developers were warned to not even look at leaked win2k code as it'd lead to accusations of contamination of FOSS with Microsoft source.

    I wonder.......

    Now gentlemen if you'll just look at the wall sized plasma screen over there you'll see "IE7 SOURCE CODE!!!!! That's right, IE7 source code! You have been contaminated and must now cease development of your precious Firefox product! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    1. Re:I remember when Win2k code leaked....... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      They'll have them sign NDA's, saying they won't show each other any confidential information. Then if either side does, no one can complain because of the NDA they signed.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    2. Re:I remember when Win2k code leaked....... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Not a problem - if they didn't sign an NDA beforehand then the firefox devs have agreed to nothing and are compelled to cease development of nothing.

      If MS themselves disclosed the source code then they've broken what is most likely their own trade secret and copyright no longer applies.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:I remember when Win2k code leaked....... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      If MS themselves disclosed the source code then they've broken what is most likely their own trade secret and copyright no longer applies.

      Neeehuh?

      Trade secrets and copyrights are entirely different. You can have one without the other. Even if they show the Mozilla devs IE source and thereby break their trade secret, it's still all covered by copyright.

      (After all, if what you said is true, then releasing software would certainly count as breaking trade secrets, and thus any copyright over the binaries would be invalidated, and thus you would be able to do anything you want with them.)

  56. What they really want by bluestar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah. Microsoft just wants a chance to look at the Mozilla source code so they can steal all the good parts.

    --
    "The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:What they really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there some part of the open source concept you fail to grasp?

    2. Re:What they really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP post is suppose to be funny. I guess that one went over your head.

  57. Non disclosure agreements? Bugzilla reports by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, May be it is real may be it is a trap. We will know which by the kind of "non disclosure" agreements they have to sign to get accepted. Further, will these developers be allowed to post the bugs/ porting issues they find openly in Bugzilla?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  58. Other way around by Epeeist · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Mozilla guys go to Redmond, manage to get FF up and running on the "final" release candidate for Vista. IE 7 is still only 55% compliant with CSS 2 and has all sorts of other breakages at this juncture and FF looks infinitely better.

    Two weeks later Vista is released and when you start FF it immediately crashes. Suddenly invites to Redmond are in short supply...

  59. Adopts best cletus voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    98% of the comments here are based on distrust, hatred, and bad jokes.

    Gee, what could Microsoft possibly have done to piss off so many people?

  60. Mozilla Developers Invited to Redmond by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Don't go!! It's a trick!!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  61. The Puppetmasters... by Lazarian · · Score: 1

    and they emerged from the building, a listless expression upon their faces...

  62. Mozilla good for Windows by sam0ht · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Windows + Mozilla is generally much more secure and usable than Windows + IE, especially for older versions of Windows. So Windows' cause is actually being helped by having a trustworthy browser available for it (as in, more people would switch to Linux otherwise).

    So perhaps MS is simply recognising this, and acting to support it ?

  63. I've heard this before by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1

    In InfoWorld that's where

    An Offer They Cannot Refuse

    Quote from the same: In an even more stunning reversal, Microsoft has invited the open source community for a sit-down to drink grappa and mangiare some cannoli. You know that scene in mob films where the godfather invites all his rivals for a meeting, excuses himself to go to the loo, and guys with submachine guns show up? My advice to open sourcers: If Ballmer leaves the room, get ready to dive under the table.

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  64. Absolutly correct. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Absolultly correct.

  65. Great strategic move on Microsoft's part by dave562 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For the longest time one of the big complaints against Microsoft has been their closed nature and their lack of interaction with developers outside of their own organization. Now they are opening up, or at least they are presenting the appearence of opening up. Only the Mozilla guys will be able to report on how open they really are. But whether or not they truly open up, by appearing to open up, they win points with corporate America. They are handing a poison pill to everyone they invite to their campus. If anyone refuses the invitation, Microsoft can later point at them and say, "We offered you the opportunity and you declined. You're the one who doesn't want to make the effort to have your product work on our OS." On another level, they can appear to be friendly and looking out for the consumer, and they can paint the OSS world as a hostile place.

    In my opinion, I think that Microsoft seriously does see the hand-writing on the wall and they do want to do more to ensure that their OS supports the programs that people want to use. Microsoft is going to trumpet their low support costs and ease of managability (think SMS, Group Policy, etc). They are going to trumpet the fact that they are the standard, and they are going to portray any group who doesn't want to work with the standard as being back-asswards and wasting time unnecessarily reinventing the wheel.

    On another level, Microsoft is trying to avoid what happened to Novell in the 1990s. Netware was a great operating system but it got to the point where they barely had any third party support. The same thing could happen to Microsoft if enough developers decide that using Microsoft dev tools is a PITA and if enough developers decide that coding to the Microsoft OS is a PITA. The one incentive that Microsoft has left is their market penetration. They can still play the economic card, and that card is, "If you develop for the MS platform, you will have a market share of XX. And by the way, that market is already used to paying out the nose for software, so you stand to make money. Now do you want that, or do you want to go to the OSS world where everyone is doing it on the cheap with razor thin margins?" And if you think about it, that's a very strong position to come from. If you're trying to make money, do you want to go with the company that has already made itself (and numerous third parties) griploads of cash, or do you want to go with the other guys who are trying to redo what Microsoft has already done, but do it "less expensively and better"? I'm of the opinion that unless the OSS world comes out with some killer functionality that operates EXCLUSIVELY outside of Windows, they're never going to win. Given how much Microsoft has been investing in intellectual property, and given how much they have already developed (OS, Office, Exchange, accounting packages, CRM packages... basically all the tools that a business needs to function), it's going to be hard to end-run around the monopoly.

    The one ray of hope is "standards" but as we've all seen, Microsoft will just ignore a standard until enough people want to use it. Then they'll offer support for it. You're seeing it now with IE7. For the longest time, MS didn't give two shits. Now enough web devs have complained loudly enough and they're finally getting what they want. IE7 might not nail it, but I'm willing to be IE7 SP3, or IE8 will. The problem with using a standard to fight Microsoft is that standards are very rarely proprietary. And as we've seen with the W3C, even "standards" are often times still works in progress.

    1. Re:Great strategic move on Microsoft's part by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the longest time one of the big complaints against Microsoft has been their closed nature and their lack of interaction with developers outside of their own organization. Now they are opening up, or at least they are presenting the appearence of opening up.

      Not really. They aren't moving to open standards, protocols, and formats. They aren't publishing their formats or protocols completely. They aren't opening up, they are just trying to make the most money while giving up the least amount of lock-in.

      In my opinion, I think that Microsoft seriously does see the hand-writing on the wall and they do want to do more to ensure that their OS supports the programs that people want to use.

      This has always been MS's policy. Make sure the popular stuff works, then gradually bundle a competitor or otherwise illegally motivate people to move to something that makes MS money.

      On another level, Microsoft is trying to avoid what happened to Novell in the 1990s. Netware was a great operating system but it got to the point where they barely had any third party support. The same thing could happen to Microsoft if enough developers decide that using Microsoft dev tools is a PITA and if enough developers decide that coding to the Microsoft OS is a PITA.

      There are only two ways for this to happen. One is for MS to lose a huge portion of the existing market. The other is for a cross-platform intermediate layer to exist. The former isn't going to happen without a huge revolution. MS has been mostly successful in killing attempts at the latter, like by intentionally breaking and not supporting Web standards by default and keeping the Web from being a viable intermediate layer until they can control it with something proprietary, like Active X or .net.

      The one ray of hope is "standards" but as we've all seen, Microsoft will just ignore a standard until enough people want to use it.

      Most users and purchasers don't want standards, they just want the benefits standards bring. MS does a great job of marketing things they claim will bring those same benefits but don't, or using a bait and switch to provide something they claim is a standard, but which turns out not to be (OpenXML).

      You're seeing it now with IE7... Now enough web devs have complained loudly enough and they're finally getting what they want.

      No, we're seeing them make lots of noise from their marketing department about standards in IE and then excuses like backwards compatibility when they are called on it by people with a clue. IE7 fails to implement huge portions of CSS and does not support XHTML despite the fact that numerous other companies and hobbyists had no trouble doing so with much fewer resources and time. And before you bring up the backwards compatibility excuse, you'd better have a good explanation why all the missing (not broken) CSS features and inclusion of XHTML would break backwards compatibility in any meaningful way.

      The problem with using a standard to fight Microsoft is that standards are very rarely proprietary.

      No, the problem is while MS fails to implement standards demanded by customers and courts and spends millions on marketing to obfuscate this fact, they are also breaking dozens of other standards that people are less cognizant of. MP3, MPEG, PDF, PNG, JPEG, etc. are all being quietly pushed out by bundled, proprietary alternatives while the pressure is on Web and Office formats.

      The bottom line is MS does not play nice and deceives people about what they are doing. MS illegally bundles everything and if you use the platform without the utmost of care (think average user or even average corporate admin), you're screwing yourself over for the future.

    2. Re:Great strategic move on Microsoft's part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >For the longest time one of the big complaints against Microsoft has been their closed nature and their lack of interaction with developers outside of their own organization.

      Disproved with one word: MSDN.

    3. Re:Great strategic move on Microsoft's part by dave562 · · Score: 1
      they are also breaking dozens of other standards that people are less cognizant of. MP3, MPEG, PDF, PNG, JPEG, etc. are all being quietly pushed out by bundled, proprietary alternatives while the pressure is on Web and Office formats.

      Do you have some evidence of this? I'm interested to know how Microsoft is "breaking" something like the JPEG standard.

    4. Re:Great strategic move on Microsoft's part by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Do you have some evidence of this? I'm interested to know how Microsoft is "breaking" something like the JPEG standard.

      In the case of JPEG, they are trying to replace both JPEG and PNG with a bundled graphics formats (Windows Media Photo) included in Windows Vista. They have contacted numerous camera and printer companies in an attempt to promote this new format, which is completely proprietary. Their hope is that they can quietly lock more people in the Windows format when they realize there is no easy, legal way to move their stored family photos to a neutral format that they can use on Linux or OS X. Further, there is talk of Web services built around this format for automated publishing as well as Frontpage integration so that people can publish their family photo galleries in a way only viewable by IE to provide incentive for people who just view images from other family members to stay on Windows. Finally, I've heard rumors of a new media format, like Kodak photo CDs, that they plan to integrate for backup and transfer to professional printers (Walmart), to make sure even old JPEGs are hard to view and harder to export without a Windows system. initially, of course, they are promising to license the format for other devices (excluding open source), but if they can ever manage to gain even moderate market share, we all know what the end result will be.

    5. Re:Great strategic move on Microsoft's part by dave562 · · Score: 1

      That's interesting information. Thanks for sharing. It definitely sucks to see things like that happening. What could very well happen is that kind of thing will backfire on them. People want computers to be simple to use, and they want to be able to share things with their friends. Proprietary standards make that difficult to do. Sometimes I wonder what the hell Microsoft is thinking. There are so many viable standards already out there, and their operating systems and applications already have enough bugs and problems to keep the coders busy for ages, it just seems stupid to waste time coming up with new products when they could be fixing the old ones.

  66. Firefox to require IE... by linebackn · · Score: 1

    And in other news the next version of Firefox will require the latest Internet Explorer to be installed to operate and the Linux and Mac versions will be discontinued.

    They already got to Netscape.

  67. When Linus and RMS visit the Mozillaplex City: by gaspar+ilom · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the 4 Mozilla developers is leading a tour for them, talking causually:

    "It's always been a danger, but it looms like a shadow over every-thing we've built here. But things have developed that will ensure security. I've just made a deal that will keep Microsoft out of here forever."

    Suddenly, a door in hallway slides open... Horror! ...Bill Gates rises from his seat at the far end of long dining table...

  68. They did that to Netscape devs back in the day, to by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They did that to Netscape devs back in the day, too, albeit in a slightly less obvious way. They'd camp out in the nearest cafes and restaurants around lunch hour and "talk" to Netscape developers, sometimes making them offers they couldn't refuse. Many of those devs were at that point more interested in Ferraris and mansions than in writing code, but MSFT hired them anyway (only to fire when Netscape kicks the bucket).

    Expect some folks getting offers in Redmond. Higher ups in IE team are downright stupid if they don't try to hire people away from Mozilla. You kill two birds with one stone - strangle Mozilla and get a good, security minded dev (who will be forced to think a lot less about security at MSFT by an arbitrary, managemen imposed deadline).

  69. Re:Ok ok... Here is the cure for inane discussions by TheCrayfish · · Score: 1

    This story act like a collectively recognized cue for making MS vs. Mozilla jokes, same with other topics that appeare at regular intervals.

    Here's a way to make every Slashdot discussion seem smarter and more interesting (assuming you are a registered and signed-in Slashdot user):

    1. Go to the top of the page and click Preferences
    2. Click Comments (between "Homepage" and "Messages".)
    3. Scroll down and configure your settings thusly:
      • Display Mode: Threaded
      • Sort Order: Highest Scores First
      • Threshold: 2:Score +2
      • Reparent highly rated comments: checked
      • Reason Modifier: Insightful +2; Informative +1; Flamebait -1; Troll -1 (This is the key that makes the whole thing work)
      • Karma Bonus: +1
    4. Click Save (very important!)
    Voila!
  70. And in other news... by Tabercil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Land's End has just announced an enormous order for several tens of billions of parkas and other winter clothing from a Mr. Bill ze Bub. Film at eleven. :)

    But seriously, this sounds like it's on the level and as a result represents an tremendous validation for the impact of open-source software. I'm all for it, and just hope that other open-source projects get invited to discuss Vista's changes and features besides Firefox. Just to name one: Samba.

  71. Nazgul by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

    They weren't so much "invited" as 9 fell riders were dispatched from Redmond crying "Mountain View..." and "Goodger..."

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  72. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not the food, is the fact it's being served by happy gnomes dressed in all the colours of the rainbow.
    I for one... would prefer pretty elves.
    1. Re:I for one... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about pretty elves as in vaguely-female things with titties and pointy ears?

      If so, Slashdot has just reached a whole new low.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  73. A fire axe by empaler · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A fire axe - surely the weapon of a madman.
    Who else would attack fire with an axe?!"

  74. Helpful advice by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) On the way into the room check for plastic sheeting on the floor
    2) Look for obvious signs of a trap door
    3) Don't eat or drink anything
    4) Don't sign anything
    5) Arrange to be deprogrammed after leaving Redmond.

  75. MS hosted Opera devs last week by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft also invited Opera devs for the same reason that they've invited FF devs (to make sure the browser runs well in Vista, and possibly makes use of some new Vista apis (e.g. Vista's Common RSS api)). Opera accepted the invitation and Opera devs paid their visit to MS last week.
    http://annevankesteren.nl/2006/08/opera-vista
    http://my.opera.com/olli/blog/show.dml/417961

    The Opera devs returned unharmed. ;-)

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  76. Re: by ATMD · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you say the mods are on crack ;)

    --
    Nobody else has this sig.
  77. Your Sig by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    when did slashdot become an unofficial apple forum? i had to block the apple section!

    Why has Slashdot always been a Linux forum? Nerd use Linux. Slashdot started carrying a lot of Apple content when Apple released an OS that nerds started using in large numbers. The fact that a lot of the most innovative features to be added to computing in the last handful of years kind of seals the deal. Even nerds who don't use OS X are usually interested in an improved replacement for "chron" or a soon to be widely deployed video chat client that can filter out your background and replace it with another in realtime. It is most certainly, news for nerds.

  78. Re: by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    I'm not afraid to be offtopic, at least the moderation is valid.
    It riles me when I see idiotic mods though.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  79. NOOOOoo, I've seen this before! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DON'T GO!!! It's just like when king Edward the Longshanks invited every nobleman who had a will to fight to talks of a truce. Even the boys, oh god, the innocent little boys were hung.

  80. Happy gnomes, you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooompah looompah doomple dee dee!
    Please won't you listen to me!
    Oooompah looompah doomple dee whee!
    I've got something to say you see!

    Oooompah looompah doomple dee crap!
    I have feeling that this is a trap!
    Oooompah looompah doomple dee dap!
    Ballamer will come up with a chair and *WHAP*!

    Oooompah looompah doomple dee kind!
    So be sure and watch your behind!
    Oooompah looompah doomple dee mind!
    Or else big trouble you'll find!

  81. No! No! by igaborf · · Score: 1
  82. "Welcome.. by Chonine · · Score: 1

    ...Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers!"

  83. It just doesn't happen by eremitic · · Score: 2, Funny

    One does not simply become invited to Mordo--...Microsoft?!

    --
    Warning: Could be fatal if taken seriously
  84. It is not a trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a cookbook!

  85. A not so modest proposal by atheken · · Score: 1

    I just wrote this up a few days ago, it would be nice if these guys thought it was a good idea and we figured out how to make it happen:

    A not-so-modest proposal.
    by Andrew Theken (andrewtheken.com)

    Ok, some of you Open Source folks aren't going to like me for this one, but here goes. Normally, I wouldn't suggest such a huge step but we need to take it. You folks over at the Mozilla Foundation need to make this happen. Things are easy to implement/design deploy with web standards, when they are adhered to. Firefox's (and KHTML's) compliance is very high compared to Internet Explorer. We need to find a way to get Microsoft to use Gecko or KHTML in Internet Explorer. I realize I might be spinning my wheels here.

    I know this may sound like blasphemy, but always look to the comments made in regards to the LGPL (I think the following has been stated by Richard Stallman - if anybody can source the following, email me, it's probably on the gnu.org site). Let me paraphrase: The LGPL is designed to allow a developer that wants to add commonly available functionality to do so without opening the entire application, so long as that functionality is not materially the core portion of the application. Basically, making it so that a commercial developer would choose an Open Source library for some small, non-critical feature instead of a commercial counterpart. Basically, something like a HTTP server, which is, at this point, a commonplace set of code. LGPL is designed to have you adopt Open Source instead of paying for a closed source trivial portion of code. Essentially, the proliferation of the Open implementation is more important than getting additional code to go "Open."

    Now, Gecko is not LGPL'd (to my knowledge), but there's a reason why I brought it up. Untold good would come from giving away Gecko to Microsoft for IE. they have a rendering engine, they could buy and integrate any one that they wished, we need them to adopt one that complies to W3C and the rest. Give 'em the engine, have them integrate it, code contributions be damned.

    Firefox would still have it's place as a more secure browser, extensions, etc. We'd just have less implementation work to do to get websites up and looking good. Something I am sure we can all appreciate.

    Let them add in all their Microsoft-y glory. Code change submissions would be optional. Require that the Gecko engine generally render in much the same way as it does in other browsers, no more, no less. We need the web standards for end users and web designers more than we need Microsoft's code.

    Now, let's not think about how perverse it would be to run Internet Explorer with a Netscape-derived rendering engine. Would Microsoft do it? Seems like their codebase for IE is so bad that they'll take any help they can get (seriously folks, I think they had 51% standards compliance in the 5.x series which jumps to 54% for IE7, I think Firefox's is about 94% -if anybody can source this, email me.).

    PLEASE Mozilla & Microsoft, share your love.

  86. Said the spider to the fly by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    First thing that came to mind...

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  87. My .... by snoggeramus · · Score: 1

    "My ... what large nails you have ..... "

  88. Microsoft needs help by stock · · Score: 1

    Vista seems to be a enormous project, which maybe even has outgrown the enormous resources at hand at Redmond campus.
    But as usual Microsoft gets lucky. Steve Jobs donates the x86 source code part of the OSX kernel to the community. And now Redmond developers need some input to get the Mozilla firefox code ported to Vista. I think Microsoft is putting the means to fit the purpose. Vista has already costed them an extra mortgage on the farm, but still ain't getting sold. They even have started to raise a small download fee for beta's of Vista. So if you want to see Vista deployed soon in real life action, you as a open source developer can help out. The problem however is that Microsoft's track record in relationships with other software companies doesn't shine brightly. If you wanna know what Vista is all about, you as a Open Source developer now get a chance, but be warned for pitfalls.

    Robert

  89. Don't underestimate the power dark side! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dork lord is insidious.