Slashdot Mirror


How They Make LEGO Bricks

harajukboy writes "Businessweek.com shows us how the famous LEGO bricks are made. Among the new facts I picked up was that LEGO is the largest tire manufacturer in the world, and that the process is so air tight that only 18 of 1 million pieces are considered defective." I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it too easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

327 comments

  1. Still Not Six Sigma by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... that the process is so air tight that only 18 of 1 million pieces are considered defective ...
    Impressive but I wouldn't call it "air tight." Six Sigma is a defect rate that many employers (including my own) constantly strive to hit. While only 18 defects per million is still impressive, the Wikipedia entry will tell you what six sigma means:
    The process was pioneered by Bill Smith at Motorola in 1986[2] and was originally defined[3] as a metric for measuring defects and improving quality, and a methodology to reduce defect levels below 3.4 Defects Per (one) Million Opportunities (DPMO), or put another way, a methodology of controlling a process to the point of plus or minus six sigma (standard deviations) from a centerline. Six Sigma has now grown beyond defect control.
    It esentially means that if you model your product as a normal curve representing rate of failure, you need to aim for six standard deviations away from the mean failure rate. That figures out to be 3.4 per million which is a fraction of 18 per million. Believe it or not, there are many companies out there that consider their products to be six sigma.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Six Sigma -- I find it hilarious. Basically, they took the work of Walter Edward Demmings, widely regarded as the driving force behind Japan's industrial turnaround, repackaged it, and called it "new". Demmings cane up with "kaizen" or the process of continual improvement. Basically, no process is complete unless it has a feedback and improving mechanism

      For anyone who is an expert: What has six sigma added to this paradigm?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Companies like to say Six Sigma(tm) in their descriptions, but very few live up to that. For example, anyone claiming six sigma for software development likely has gaps in understanding of both topics. Does anyone who manufactures actual products have a defect rate of 3.4 per million or less? Or is this like ISO certifications where if you document your process for sweeping the defective products under the run, you don't have to count them in the defect rate?

    3. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by DrRobert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually 1-2ppm defects is a common goal and easily obtainable with proper controls. 18ppm would be unacceptable in some regulated industries and considered an out-of-control process.

    4. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Josh+Lindenmuth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also a matter of what is classified as a defect in a Lego. I've used Lego that are not 100% aligned, or that don't stay together real well all the time. My son's set falls apart when certain shapes are connected. I consider this a defect, but obviously they don't. One easy way to achieve such low defect rates is simply to redefine 'defect'.

      --
      Huh? Don't mind me, I'm just the new guy.
    5. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, it's 4.5 standard deviations out. It also says that Six Sigma is "widely discredited".

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by balsy2001 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How easy it is to obtain depends almost entirely what you standards are. For example if you make metal forgins and you say you can live with an internal defect that is 0.25" in diameter you will be able to attain a 6 sigma process much easier than if you said your standard was 1/10 that size. The sigma level for the same product line can change just based on who the customer is. The higher the regulation of an industy and therefore necessity for quality (think nuclear or aircraft) the less likely you are to have a high sigma process because you can't tolerate the same kind of defects. That is why nuclear grade materials or aircraft certified parts are SO much more expensive than your run of the mill hardware store (home depot) parts/materials that look the same. Go back to material forgings, material that goes into a nuclear reactor has to have much smaller allowable defects than say the same material (like stainless steel) that will be used for you hammer in your house. To get material that meets the requirements you have to inspect much more product and reject at much higher rates.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    7. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by muffel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, didn't you read the relevant Dilbert?

      --

      bla
    8. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by zcubed · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by orgelspieler · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What has six sigma added to this paradigm?

      Bureaucracy.

      At least in GE's implementation of Six Sigma. They found a way to take what is essentially the engineering version of the scientific process, wrap it in so much red tape that it is unworkable (a 12-step process that really had 15 steps) , and put it in the hands of every worker in the company. Originally they gave bonuses for doing it, but eventually they took those away and declared "Thou shalt not get a raise without a Six Sigma Project." What ended up happening is that people refused to make any process or product improvements unless they were part of somebody's (preferably their own) Six Sigma project.

      It was ridiculous. You ended up with one person optimizing a part of a process, while the person in the next cubicle was eliminating the entire process in favor of a more unwieldy one. Then, six months later, somebody else would start a new project that essentially put the original process back in place. Of course the problem was that they were using a distinctly product-oriented procedure, and trying to use it to solve process problems.

      Don't even get me started on the math. They would assume normal distributions for everything. Never mind that one of the steps was to prove normalcy. If that test proved it wasn't normal, you were instructed by your "Black Belt" to assume normalcy anyway -- even if a Weibull distribution was clearly the correct choice (like in timed exercises). Idiots, I say. And then they had PHB's (called "Black Belts" and "Master Black Belts") trying to tell engineers how to do math, when they didn't even know how to use a simple Q test. If they saw a data point that didn't support their theory, they just called it an outlier, and deleted it.

      You'd think after nearly two years of not working at GE, I wouldn't get so wound up about it. I guess as an engineer, it really gets my goat when people use math improperly.

    10. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Rhys · · Score: 1

      I'd rather they throw away 18 out of every million pieces than raise the cost what it'd take to get down to 1-2 defects per million. Plus if I remember right from the lego history book, the bricks that are defective can be re-molded.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    11. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Rhys · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ask them to replace the parts. They will. Usually, they won't even charge you for it, nor require the bad part back.

      http://www.lego.com/eng/service/replacementparts.a sp

      Worked fantastic for the one bad part from Lego I have ever received. That ranges from the early 80s through today, and yes I still get bricks in fairly high quantity.

      I suspect your real problem is that your son has bricks which are not actually Lego bricks. Mega blocks and others try to be like Lego but the quality just isn't there in their bricks. I've been kicking a few out of my collection recently that I found while sorting.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    12. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      I've had an innumerable amount of legos, not including the ones at my grandparents which were manufactured well before the 80s decade when I was playing with them, and I can't remember one specific incident of a "defective" lego piece.

      Perhaps he's expecting too much from say, what one or two pegs can hold? In any case, it will help him distinguish the difference between support of 2 pegs and 4, etc, so he's learning some concepts quite early. Have you written lego? I'm confident they'll go to great lengths to correct your situation. This doesn't mean post on the godawful forums, but actually write them a postal mail or email. A non aggressive postal mail written by a child will probably get you the best results. If my daughter has defective toys, I (help) her write letters to the companies and she's usually _very_ happy with the result.

    13. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually 1-2ppm defects is a common goal and easily obtainable with proper controls. 18ppm would be unacceptable in some regulated industries and considered an out-of-control process.


      I'm sure Intel or AMD would love to hire you.

    14. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by saider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they saw a data point that didn't support their theory, they just called it an outlier, and deleted it.

      This is a fundamental failure in human thought and is pervasive at all levels of society. If something does not fit your preconceived notion of how things should be, make it fit!

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    15. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by NineNine · · Score: 1

      For anyone who is an expert: What has six sigma added to this paradigm?

      A very misleading Wikipedia entry. That's about it. Six Sigma is just an arbitrary defect rate that was chosen by Motorola as they were implementing Demming's ideas.

    16. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Well, you gotta give GE credit... They were some of the first ones doing this 20+ years ago in this country, and they trained all of their managers in process improvement (who in turn, went out and preached the gospel at other companies). They were really at the bleeding edge of process management at the time. Maybe GE's going to become a regular big, bloated company now that Jack's gone. :(

    17. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure Intel or AMD would love to hire you.

      Or probably not. They have much lower yield rates because their processes are constantly shrinking, often to double the number transistors in a given area every year and a half. I read there's an adage in the DRAM industry that too high of a yield is bad because it means there's capacity potential not being properly exploited. If they didn't keep pushing much faster and much higher capacity products, I think they could do six sigma.

      As others have noted, six-sigma has been a failure in business. You get reduced defect rates, but the cost in getting such a low defect rate is generally so exorbitantly expensive that you are better off recycling the rejects than spending the money to eliminate rejects. There's a similar joke about ISO90001 that you get half the defect rate because it cuts your productivity in half, or practically doubles the cost per part because of the beauracracy involved.

    18. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by mcvos · · Score: 1
      Actually 1-2ppm defects is a common goal and easily obtainable with proper controls. 18ppm would be unacceptable in some regulated industries and considered an out-of-control process.

      But are those regulated industries making toys?

      I suspect they're either making business critical stuff, or stuff that could threaten lives if broken. For a toy maker, 18 ppm sounds pretty impressive.

    19. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by peragrin · · Score: 1

      As the other poster said are they all lego? mega blocks hook up with lego blocks but don't quite fit.

      Did a relative buy a non-lego set as a gift, and the blocks get mixed up?

      while it is possible to be defective most of the time it comes down to.

      1)Non-lego block
      2)the block was warped(through heat or strong twisting motion(yes I have broken blocks that way)
      3)Bad engineering design.(least likely, though I have had lego tower's fall apart because I forgot to reinforce a section I added on afterwards.)

      Go through those steps and then go ask for a defective replacement block.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    20. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A long way of saying "It depends on what your definition of 'defective' is".. =)

    21. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you written lego?
      How will writing "lego" help anyone? Maybe he should write to the company instead...
    22. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How very true. I have worked where 3 sigma was working just fine. This metric is basically a
      weighted (based on past performance/expierence in the process) measurement to see when a
      process is getting out of control. Demming did a lot for Japan, as opposed to Baldridge, who
      tried to emulate Demming, then died falling off a horse I believe it was? No Seat belt apparently.

      A Demming Award has worldwide prestiege, the Baldridge? It is an easily studied-for test.

      Much like the J.D. Powers Award, pay enough, use the same methods and you are in the club.
      What a pile of crap.

      Legos are toys. Hardly news for Nerds. More likely News for people who never grew up.

      Geee, if One razor blade is good, then 5+ MUST be better. Hogwash.

    23. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by maxume · · Score: 1

      No one ever seems to talk about the other side of the standard deviation stuff, one way to make six sigma is to loosen up the acceptance requirements(design in looser tolerances) so that more parts work, bingo you have six sigma. It is usually the cheaper win too, but as you say, some stuff just has to be better. I guess it feels like cheating, but the goal is efficiency, not perfect parts, and as long as you don't sacrifice quality, who cares.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    24. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will writing "lego" help anyone? Maybe he should write to the company instead...

      ...which is called Lego.

      Nice try. Fell flat.

    25. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It also says that Six Sigma is "widely discredited".
      And if you read the article, you'll notice that your quote of "widely discredited" comes from the Trivia section from a Dilbert comic. Now there's a reliable source.
    26. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by einnar2000 · · Score: 1

      Six Sigma is a process that allows middle managers to generate enough work and paperwork to justify their existance.

    27. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Beavbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      make it fit!
      Actually.... that's EXACTLY what I do with my Legos!

    28. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Informative

      At least in GE's implementation of Six Sigma. They found a way to take what is essentially the engineering version of the scientific process, wrap it in so much red tape that it is unworkable (a 12-step process that really had 15 steps) , and put it in the hands of every worker in the company. Originally they gave bonuses for doing it, but eventually they took those away and declared "Thou shalt not get a raise without a Six Sigma Project." What ended up happening is that people refused to make any process or product improvements unless they were part of somebody's (preferably their own) Six Sigma project.

      I've seen this happen at four major companies so far (two are places I've worked, and two are places a friend has worked).

      Wanna see a pure clusterfuck of total bureaucracy? Find a place that tries to combine Six Sigma and CMM.
      It's buzzwordolicious!

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    29. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by petro6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you sound exactly like my brother (who used to work for GE, hated it, and would find particular interest in this story) ;) I think there are a number of other process management systems that mirror the inefficiencies of six sigma by overemphasizing the measurement of the process and under-emphasizing the process itself. The system needn't be a product-oriented procedure. These systems make management feel as though they have a purpose. Management should ask themselves "is it more important to know exactly how wrong we are or is it more important not to be wrong." You could measure a production method or business process to any particular degree of accuracy (or make it as inaccurate as you deem necessary to fit your model) but at some point the optimization of a process creates more inefficiency than an unoptimized process.

    30. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny
      18ppm would be unacceptable in some regulated industries and considered an out-of-control process.
      No offense intended to anyone, but has everyone forgotten that we are talking about childrens' plastic building blocks, not a nuclear power station or the Space Shuttle?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It did rather.

      "Writing someone" as opposed to "writing to someone" is an Americanism and reads rather oddly to the British. It suggests getting a pen and scribbling "lego lego lego lego lego".

    32. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Basically, they took the work of Walter Edward Demmings

      [sigh] William Edwards Deming.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    33. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Unless they add a specific hardener to the plastic post material intake (which I wouldn't imagine they'd do) the bad bricks just go into a grinder and are dumped back into the incoming bin...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    34. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by jafac · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      All I need to know about Six Sigma, I learned from last Sunday's Dilbert strip.

      Oh yeah, and the failure of my last two employers who were suckered-into Yet Another Consultancy Scam.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    35. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I still think 6 was chosen because it's alliterative.

      If standard deviation was called "phi", it would have been Four Phi or Five Phi.

      Or Three Theta or Two Tau...

      When I first heard of Six Sigma, just the name struck me as being irredeemably silly, and the fact that it implies such a fantastic level of accuracy (or success or whatever you want to call "lack of defects"), made me immediate assume it was just another stupid management fad.

      Since I haven't had experience with it, I'll leave it to others to point out whether or not I was right.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    36. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, there are many companies out there that consider their products to be six sigma.

      Can you name one? That uses a process that involves humans (not a straight chemical reaction, etc.) and actually achieves 3.4/10^6 defects?

      For all GE's talk about six-sigma I went shopping for a refrigerator and found at least 6 errors on their website. I guess the other two million pages were error-free.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    37. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. I had read about some of his work about 15 years ago,and was very impressed. I am, however, very bad at name. I once mis-introduced my wife, and am still hearing about it!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    38. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Wanna see a pure clusterfuck of total bureaucracy? Find a place that tries to combine Six Sigma and CMM.
      It's buzzwordolicious!


      I've been there. Don't wanna go back. You can keep the damn T-shirt. :-)
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    39. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by kmhebert · · Score: 1

      Lego are capable of building some pretty impressive things.

      --
      Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
    40. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      I have a friend in the screw industry, and another in the gear industry. You'd think those were commodity things, right? One size fits all, lowest price wins, failure rate should be as high as you can get away with?

      But think about it - in a modern car engine, a $0.10 bolt fails, a $1.00 gear fails - and you have a $1,000 factory warantee repair. How much would you pay to lower your repair rate from 1% to 0.5% on a million cars? Up to 5 million dollars! The failure rates on some of this stuff is so low that it is unreal - it is a real piont of competition!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    41. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      I think you will appreciate this

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    42. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by gidds · · Score: 1
      Indeed. I find it strange because in most cases, the Americanism is to add prepositions, not remove them.

      For example, we have the concise form to 'beat someone'. Common UK usage lengthens that to 'beat someone up' (which is arguably justified by a slight change in meaning). The US usage seems to be 'beat up on someone', for which I can find no justification at all. (Why stop there? Why not 'beat up onto for at someone'?)

      The other Americanism which really grates for me right now is the use of day and month names as adverbs. "A spokesman said Thursday..." No, he didn't. He didn't say the word 'Thursday' at all. What he did was say something on Thursday, which is completely different!

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    43. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      For anyone who is an expert: What has six sigma added to this paradigm?

      Six Sigma quantifies the process -- it tells you when you have achieved your goal, that is, when you reach only 3.4 defects parts per million (ppm) products. There are different Sigmas, such as Three Sigma, which designate 2700 defective PPM, but Six Sigma is widely adopted as a measure of production success.

      In other words, 3.4 ppm is good enough whereas, correct me if I'm wrong, it seems "kaizen" is never good enough (continual improvement). Other than that, the DMAIC process under Six Sigma seems very similar to kaizen, I'll agree there.

      By the way, I'm not an expert on the subject, I just work for a company that trains its employees to use the Six Sigma methodology.

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    44. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to the company I interned at this past summer. We both compete and have a joint partnership in the same industry ;)

    45. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      It's odd to many Americans too, as is "SMS speak" on non-SMS media, writing without punctuation or capitalization, etc. I'm far from perfect, but at least I make an effort to write coherently.

    46. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I suspect your real problem is that your son has bricks which are not actually Lego bricks. Mega blocks and others try to be like Lego but the quality just isn't there in their bricks. I've been kicking a few out of my collection recently that I found while sorting.

      I don't think that's it, I've had only genuine Legos and the connection strength varied depending on the stone, some were almost impossible to separate while others fell apart at the slightest touch. I think the age of the blocks was correlated closely to the looseness (if the shape was consistent, some shapes were also stickier than others) so maybe it's just the bricks wearing out and deforming over time?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    47. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    48. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Indeed. I find it strange because in most cases, the Americanism is to add prepositions, not remove them. "

      They have these 'weird' sayings on both sides of the pond.

      The one I notice the most, is the Europeans saying something like "Going to University..." or "..while I was at University". Something always sounded strange to me with that, then I noticed they were leaving out the 'the' or 'a'. You'd never hear that in the US. It would be more like "While I was at the University...or while I was in college....or why yes..I attend that University".

      So, goes to show we all have little different ways of phrasing the same thing.

      The only one that bothers me, and I'm not sure who is more guilty of it...is spelling 'lose' as 'loose'.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    49. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I am your brother, silly. I'm so glad you finally got a log in name. :-)

    50. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Billions in consulting fees

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    51. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The 'Six Sigma' rate can be extremely good, if you're talking about an individual item as a whole, and extremely bad if you figure it as 'points of possible failure'.

      For example, a Six Sigma car will probably still have a defect, somewhere. I can see the engine alone having more than a million possible points of failure.

      Like another poster said, basic fastener companies actually do much better than six sigma.

      It all comes down to how much it costs to eliminate the failures, whether through better production processes or testing during or after manufacture and how critical the items are(toys can stand much higher failure rates than airplanes), and what the consumer is willing to pay to get the higher reliability.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    52. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      It esentially means that if you model your product as a normal curve representing rate of failure, you need to aim for six standard deviations away from the mean failure rate. That figures out to be 3.4 per million which is a fraction of 18 per million. Believe it or not, there are many companies out there that consider their products to be six sigma.
      You're missing the important part of the calculation -- six sigma isn't targeting 3.4 errors per million products, it's targeting 3.4 errors per opportunity. If there are six processes in manufacturing a lego brick, then six sigma would mean less than 3.4 errors per million units for each of those processes -- leading to just over 20 faulty pieces per million.

      Now, I don't know how many error opportunities are involved in the manufacturing process for Lego bricks, but without knowing the number of potential failure points, you can't judge whether a production process meets six sigma standards.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    53. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It tends to be criticised most places except forums primarily populated by under 16's. You'll occasionally get sarcastic comments along the lines of "did you post that on a keyboard or a mobile phone?".

    54. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The only one that bothers me, and I'm not sure who is more guilty of it...is spelling 'lose' as 'loose'.

      Me too. I once did a search of our entire codebase to sort this one out.

    55. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Management should ask themselves "is it more important to know exactly how wrong we are or is it more important not to be wrong."

      Any rational manager would answer that the former is more important - because you will go wrong, and you cannot fix the problem unless you know where and how you went wrong.
    56. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      You'd think after nearly two years of not working at GE, I wouldn't get so wound up about it. I guess as an engineer, it really gets my goat when people use math improperly.

      I left GE in early 2002 when the "drink the koolaid" was still strong. Went away for 4.5 years or so, back now and the whole six-sigma thing has all but disappeared. The tools are still around, to be used when appropriate, but the whole framework around it that you and I found annoying isn't here at least in this business. The whole cult-status thing seems to have gone away, much to my relief. That was actually one of my questions in the interviews to come back here, I knew things were good when I got a quizzical look when asking how Six Sigma was being implemented these days. I can't say that I miss it. Some good tools (the 4-block, and other basic engineering/feeback/improve stuff) are still in use, and that's appropriate. The saffron robes, tamorines, and vacant stares of "let me tell you about six sigma" while handing me a pamphlet? Keep it. It's much better now.

    57. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is a characteristic of a lot of managers, especially those who aren't overly competent in the area that they're managing. They want to feel useful, other than the normal job of hiding bureaucracy from productive workers. Other managers may not feel secure in their position, or there may be a lot of politics, so these managers want to look useful to other managers and their superiors. The goal for many is either be useful, or look useful. So anytime there's a tool out there that claims to help productivity, or a fad to jump onto, or a buzzword that all the other managers talk about knowingly, these managers grab onto it. Metrics are immensely important to this type of manager, since these are numbers which can be used to "prove" their usefulness. Any tool or fad that also has numbers and measurements with it, is therefore even more attractive. Six Sigma even has a number in its name; it's the ultimate managerial aphrodesiac.

    58. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by petro6 · · Score: 1

      Point well taken. Of course there is a balance. Knowing where things go wrong and/or how is irrelevant if all the time/resources that should be spent on building better processes/products is instead spent measuring them. A rational manager may say the former, but a GOOD manager would never say the former to the exclusion of the latter.

    59. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by evil_Tak · · Score: 1

      Raytheon. They were trumpeting about six sigma compliance when I worked for them in 2002.

    60. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention "finding it hard to breath".

    61. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by gatesvp · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. You beat me to it.

    62. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by dcam · · Score: 1

      There's a similar joke about ISO90001 that you get half the defect rate because it cuts your productivity in half, or practically doubles the cost per part because of the beauracracy involved.

      We were once ISO 9000 qualified. That was hilarious. Effectively they don't care what you do so long as you intend to do it and you document. So your process for dealing with customer complaints was to tie the customers together to form a raft, that is fine so long as you document it.

      --
      meh
    63. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't talk to me about six fucking sigma. The pointy haired ones at work are all "Six Sigma Green Belts" and have started imposing "Values" on everyone. Its management bingo du jour, and will hopefully stop real soon.

    64. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go through those steps and then go ask for a defective replacement block.
      Why would I want a defective replacement block?
    65. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Similar techniques are used in Holland to decrease criminality, and by the US to increase the amount of democratic countries in the world.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    66. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six sigma is a destination, kaizen is a journey. Kaizen may or may not be the journey to six sigma.

      Kaizen is the process of improvement, innovation and cutting down / eliminating / shortening of existing process. This is usually done to reduce lead time and therefore increase productivity and therefore reduce cost per item. Now, sometimes an innovation will improve quality, but not often. More often than not it will cause a defective item to pass through QC, but for most companies, that's a risk they are willing to take.

      I work at Sony. This is standard practice here, and in many other companies (as long as safety is not an issue). We have 'kaizen day' every week, the usual focus is to cut down the SST (Sony Standard Time) or lead time to produce one product. Very seldom is there an Innovation that adds to the SST - unless it can be proven to reduce one assembly-line operator OR reduce quality related issues to 0.0%

    67. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by DeadboltX · · Score: 1

      I think 18 defects per million for LEGO pieces is a lot more impressive than you think.

      -You might think of it in terms of exploding batteries, 18 batteries that will explode out of a million. Impressive? Maybe, but still a risk.
      -What about tires, 18 out of a million where the tread will fall off, thats a very dangerous 18.
      -Lets look at something a little less dangerous to the consumer, how about 18 of 1 million pixels on an LCD display being dead, that would be more than enough to annoy the shit out of me.

      When it comes to LEGO pieces, 18 out of a million is not bad at all considering their small size and ease to replace.

      Hell, between my dog and my mom's vacuum cleaner I probably lost 18 LEGO pieces every time I busted my set out.

    68. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      I noticed they were leaving out the 'the' or 'a'. You'd never hear that in the US. It would be more like "While I was at the University...or while I was in college

      So why is the article needed for "university" but not for college? "Go to university" and "goto college" are at least consistent (and so would be "go to the university" and "go to the college"). When it is OK to say "in college" then it should be OK to say "at university".

      (Not to mention that the difference bewteen the two is at best puzzling to me...)

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    69. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by CalSolt · · Score: 1

      Uh, well, in a lot of scientific and engineering applications, outliers can be attributed to random errors in the equipment taking the measurements, in which case they ought to be ignored because including them will just throw off your measurements.

    70. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by greginnj · · Score: 1

      Agreed - I was going to make a similar comment until I saw yours. Here's a related calculation -- what is the cost of their failure rate?

      Producing 15 billion per year, with 18 defects per million, gives us:

      1.5e10 x ( 18 / 1e6 ) = 270,000 pieces per year.

      If we assume their marginal cost of production for one brick is 1 cent (a generous estimate, I would think), this means that the cost of their defects per annum is ... $ 2,700.

      I consider that impressive, as a measure of their process engineering. If their defect rate was 180 per million, would you accept the project to get it down to 18 per million, with a budget of $ 27,000 per year for the improvements?

      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    71. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by fallout+dude · · Score: 1

      Well I just hope you have a very good look at your outliers before you ignore/delete them as outliers are in many cases very good indicators (often the only indicators) of problems in your process.

    72. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by greginnj · · Score: 1

      "beat up on..." is a colloquialism, most heavily used in rural and/or uneducated language groups ("yobs", I believe, would be your word, right?). More interesting in general is the addition of the preposition to change meaning, which is standard usage on both sides of the pond. "to beat up" is a 'phrasal verb' -- a term I didn't know until I came across advanced English instruction books in France. Think about the different meanings foreigners have to learn for:

      to put, to put on, to put over, to put up, to put up with, to put upon, to put through (e.g. school), to put across, to put to ("I put it to him...") , to put in, .... etc.

      These are not euphemisms; they're just distinct meanings depending on the associated preposition. It's basically the same thing the Germans do with prepositional prefixes to their verbs (which sometimes get detached).

      As long as we're airing pet peeves about regional English ... I can deal with dropped articles ( "I had to go to hospital .../ to university"), but when are you going to do something about verb-subject agreement?

      "The committee are proposing ..."

      I mean really, there's just one committee, it's a singular noun, it takes a singular verb!

      I'm just having you on ... let's go make fun of Australians now!

      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    73. Re:Still Not Six Sigma by saider · · Score: 1

      It is fine to have bad measurements, but they must be explained and not discarded. Proper equipment should not be making "random errors". It is in the process of explaining the outlier, that you find the cause of the "random error". Once known, you can take precautions to prevent it from happening again.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    74. Re: Still Not Six Sigma by gidds · · Score: 1
      Ah, yes, well phrasal verbs are something else, and I wouldn't want to decry their use. It it's only unnecessary (and perhaps ignorant) addition of prepositions that annoys me.

      And yes, verb-subject agreement is another awkward area. I had no idea that problems with 'committee' and other groups might be seen as a regional issue; I'd assumed it was more about fussy, old-fashioned, traditional use. You could also see it as a useful distinction between treating a group as a single-minded unit ('the committee feels that...'), and as a collection of individuals ('the committee feel that...').

      Things get even more complicated when considering inanimate groups. Consider 'A lot of things have...', 'A number of things have...', 'A mass of things have...', 'A truckload of things have...', 'A group of things have...', 'A parcel of things have...'. Arguably the first of those is correct, and the last incorrect (should be 'has'); but where do you draw the line between them?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  2. Where do they all go by loftwyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article says they make 18 billion a year! Since they've been building bricks since 1958, that means there's a HELL of a lot of bricks somewhere.

    I think a recycle your Lego campaign should start and you should send all your old Lego to me.

    This is not just a grab to make sure I have more Lego than you.

    1. Re:Where do they all go by LordSnooty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where do they go? The bottom of my foot, normally, then straight into the bin after I let out a squeal of pain.

    2. Re:Where do they all go by heroofhyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guess what the article doesn't say: How they actually make them. You read the entire article, which is basically just a fluff piece history of the company and some numbers that might as well be from the LEGO Employees' Quarterly Newsletter, and get to the bottom where there's a link to a slideshow of how they're produced. Lo and behold the slideshow link gives you a 404 File Not Found. So if you only clicked on this story under the impression that it is of any use for explaining or illustrating the production process, you're in for a huge disappointment. Maybe someone could add "Thanks to Businessweek.com's Broken Website I Still Don't Know" in front of the title "How They Make LEGO Bricks."

      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    3. Re:Where do they all go by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1

      They pour plastic into molds and let them cool. Bricks are then removed from the molds and packaged for sale.

    4. Re:Where do they all go by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lo and behold the slideshow link gives you a 404 File Not Found.

      I was able to view the slideshow. Nothing impressive, but nice pics.

      this presentation is better, including short video clips of the machines in action. It's also more fun. Requires Flash, though.
      same presentation without it opening in a popup window

    5. Re:Where do they all go by flabbergasted · · Score: 1
      The article says they make 18 billion a year! Since they've been building bricks since 1958, that means there's a HELL of a lot of bricks somewhere.

      Did you look under the sofa?

    6. Re:Where do they all go by Proud+like+a+god · · Score: 1

      But some of us may have been interested in exactly the steps they go through to ensure such levels of quality...

    7. Re:Where do they all go by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Lego Mindstorms offers you the ability to create a robot that can identify and pick up bricks! Just don't make it too smart, it might start evolving!

    8. Re:Where do they all go by SandiConoverJones · · Score: 1

      Ok, ok, I'll check my dryer. How many are you missing?

    9. Re:Where do they all go by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Nope, they're pressed/injection moulded (A strange combination of the two) then rapidly cooled and released. The rate is, if my memory serves me, 1.2 bricks per second per moulding machine. (In batches of 12, done in about 10 seconds per batch)

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:Where do they all go by DorianBrytestar · · Score: 1

      Where do they all go? I take them =) http://www.poseidonguild.com/legos

    11. Re:Where do they all go by C.A.+Nony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      > The article says they make 18 billion a year! Since they've been building bricks since 1958, that means there's a HELL of a lot of bricks somewhere.

      Global warming is caused by the earth's rotation being affected by a significant redistribution of mass on the planet surface. Lego bricks to my basement, that is. Fortunately, my sons care little about the climate since they are mostly indoors anyway.

      --
      J
    12. Re:Where do they all go by Jorgandar · · Score: 1

      All your lego's are belong to us.

    13. Re:Where do they all go by kramulous · · Score: 1

      They go to the same place pens go.

      --
      .
    14. Re:Where do they all go by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      that should be on the prospective parent test... the 3am walk thru legos barefoot

    15. Re:Where do they all go by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
      ...with a properly weighted mock-up of your second child in your arms on the way to the crib! IN my case, I ended up with a twisted ankle and an impacted shoulder where I fell into the toy-box while twisting desperately to avoid crunching the "child process" under me. Older child lost the use of the Lego for a solid month after that one, and since then I don't bother picking them up while vacuuming.

      man I am beginning to love that tinkle-tinkle-clatter sound of a brick getting sucked up!

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  3. Make that the largest little tire manufacturer by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    FTFA:
    Tire production accounts for some of that number; the factory also produces 306 million tiny rubber tires a year. In fact, going by that number, LEGO is the world's No. 1 tire manufacturer.

    Because those bitty tires that come in Lego kits are directly comparable to the fifteen inch Yokohamas I just bought.

    1. Re:Make that the largest little tire manufacturer by krakelohm · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are better quality... when is the last time you had to take your lego ride in for new tires?

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
  4. Tires by Himring · · Score: 3, Funny

    LEGO is the largest tire manufacturer in the world

    Yet, when making a car, you are hard-pressed to find four of the same set in a very huge bucket filled with Legos....

    Yes, I play legos with my kids....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Tires by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      LEGO is the largest tire manufacturer in the world Yet, when making a car, you are hard-pressed to find four of the same set in a very huge bucket filled with Legos.... Yes, I play legos with my kids....
      I was "helping" my nephew build stuff with his legos over thanksgiving. My first task was to "school" him on what NOT to take apart. He had every tire pulled off its wheel and every wheel pulled off its axle! Additionally, the minifigs were disassembled completely, down to having no HANDS, and the 2-square vertical hinge pieces were all pulled apart also. Kids!
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Tires by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      "Tire production accounts for some of that number; the factory also produces 306 million tiny rubber tires a year."

      I'm guessing there's a relates statistic that says that 76.5 million tiny rubber tyres get eaten by kids every year.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:Tires by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I share my legos with the kids... sometimes.

  5. How many times do we have to say it? by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Informative

    The plural of Lego is Lego NOT Legos! I'm getting fed up with every slashdot article on Lego getting this wrong, and a huge portion of the debate being about the pluralisation not the story.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The plural of Lego is Lego NOT Legos!

      The singular of LEGO is LEGO not Lego.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Cerberus7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, if you're fed up with the debate about pluralization taking over the discussion instead of the actual story, why is it that you are the first one to bring it up? Hmmm? :)

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    3. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by n9891q · · Score: 3, Funny

      The word Lego is a trademark and must be used as an adjective. Thus the "plural of Lego[sic]" is "Lego plastic doodads".
      -----
      IANAL but I play one on Slashdot.

    4. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by SoapDish · · Score: 1
      You may also note that in the summary, it was going really well until the editor started writing. Even the title was correct!

      harajukboy writes
      Businessweek.com shows us how the famous LEGO bricks are made. Among the new facts I picked up was that LEGO is the largest tire manufacturer in the world, and that the process is so air tight that only 18 of 1 million pieces are considered defective.

        I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it to easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.
    5. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like sheep. You can have a box of sheep, you can build things out of sheep bricks, but there are no such things as sheeps.

    6. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The plural of Lego is Lego NOT Legos! I'm getting fed up with every slashdot article on Lego getting this wrong, and a huge portion of the debate being about the pluralisation not the story.

      Oh boy, I love it when people get nitpicky about things they don't know about. Whether we call them Legos, Lego, LEGOs or LEGO, we're legally wrong (and I do it all the time). The correct answer, as Susan Williams instructed us on the back of every instruction manual from the late 70s through 1987 (?) is to call them Lego brand building blocks. "Lego", it turns out, is the brand name, not the product. They're afraid of Tyco being able to call their products "MegaBlock brand lego blocks" and diluting their trademark like so many other companies.

      Personally, I have a closet loaded with Legos. When my daughter graduates from Duplos, she'll get Legos. I'm not a lawyer, and I really don't care about trademarks enough to force that kind of burden onto children. My children will be taught that copyright and intellectual property law is there only to further the progress of art and science, not for the purpose of furthering jobs or corporate profits (although in any free market economy companies will be rewarded for meaninful progress of art and science). While I lean liberal in many beliefs, I'm fully aware of how limiting the US Constitution is with regard to intellectual property; it's very precise and quite limiting.

    7. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Speare · · Score: 1

      Like you, some of my first lessons in intellectual property considerations came from LEGO(tm) Brick toys. This is over thirty years ago. "Dad, what's that 'PATENT' or 'PAT PEND' stamp that I find hidden inside each brick?" Every set came with a pamplet that reminded folks about the proper trademark usage, "LEGO Brick" not "Legos," along with the possibly-fictitous contact name of Susan Williams for customer services in the USA. If they don't make a visible motion to attempt to enforce their trademark, they feel a legal risk of losing trademark protection status. It's the nature of the beast.

      However, even if I'm a fan of LEGO, even if I think that Mega-Blox are plastic turds compared to the One True Brick, I do not feel obligated to become a part of LEGO Inc.'s trademark enforcement responsibilities. If *I* want to say "Legos", I don't feel guilty saying it. If I see other people saying "Legos", I don't feel obligated to deputize myself and serve legal papers on the errant kid or parent. Let it go, man. Play good.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    8. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Well that's because this is obviously a press release. LEGO is not going to screw up its own name.

      --
      Why not fork?
    9. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by zerosix · · Score: 2, Informative
      I beg to differ! Check it out. http://www.ericharshbarger.org/lego/faq.html

      18. Which is correct as the plural of LEGO: 'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark). This is not to say that I use the word correctly 100% of the time... but that's the answer to the question (it's always fun/painful to read the near-flame-wars that start at slashdot.org over this topic... and generally, both sides are wrong).

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. ~Albert Einstein
    10. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by ebh · · Score: 1

      We have the same problem in tournament Scrabble, where Hasbro is constantly exhorting us to refer to "the SCRABBLE(tm) Brand Crossword Game", or at least, "the SCRABBLE(tm) game," and yes, the whole word is supposed to be capitalized in print.

      We're a famously anal-retentive lot, and so periodically, someone corrects someone else on the use of the trademark. Every time that happens, I like to point out that there are many other owners of vigorously-defended trademarks that don't expect their customers to refer to their products with such unwieldy verbiage. For example, I've never seen anything from Coca-Cola telling use to refer to their signature product as "the COCA-COLA brand cola drink". They're perfectly happy with us calling it "Coke," even though in the South (where Coca-Cola is headquartered), people have genericized the term "coke" to refer to *any* soft drink, not just cola.

    11. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      The plural of Lego is Lego NOT Legos! I'm getting fed up with every slashdot article on Lego getting this wrong, and a huge portion of the debate being about the pluralisation not the story.

      Pssst, at least so far, the Lego company is not our corporate overlord and we don't need to welcome them by calling "Legos" Lego Building Blocks. Be free! Be free! Legos! Legos!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    12. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, are you ever going to have a hard life if the evolution of language gets you all up in a tizzy like this.

    13. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by bestinshow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am interested in this LegOS. Does it run on standard x86 hardware?

      I think that Legos is the most retarded pluralisation of Lego, however incorrect just using Lego as the term is. Hell Legoes seems more correct (c.f., Hero -> Heroes). Then again the English language isn't exactly consistent, and the American variant hasn't made any leaps to improve it.

      Good work on the teaching of the whys and wherefores of things to your offspring though.

    14. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that to != too.

    15. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by SteveDob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surely that should have been 'Lego brand building bloxen'

    16. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I have a closet loaded with Legos. When my daughter graduates from Duplos, she'll get Legos. I'm not a lawyer, and I really don't care about trademarks enough to force that kind of burden onto children.

      I think that this is the number one failure of Trademark law, that no matter what YOU do, you can lose your trademark because you are unable to convince the masses to use a ridiculously long artificial construct like "Lego Brand Building Blocks". The need to defend your trademark against everything that might possibly be perceived as an infringement is also absurd. Trademark law should go back to what it was originally intended to do: allow a company to market a product with a unique name without any competitor using that name for their product as well. A trademark would remain active for as long as a company uses it, no more, no less.

      This could be easily fixed, and companies and citizens alike across the country would breathe a sigh of relief.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    17. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Dunkirk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sheesh. You're probably one of those guys who still runs around calling GNU/Linux just plain, old "Linux." Get a clue, man!

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    18. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      So, if you're fed up with the debate about pluralization taking over the discussion instead of the actual story, why is it that you are the first one to bring it up? Hmmm? :)
      So, if you're fed up with people making posts about the debate about pluralization taking over the discussion instead of the actual story, why is it that you are replying to him? Hmmm? :)
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I talk to Danes who work for Lego they freely say legoes, the company appears to have a lot less trouble wiht the plural slang form than you.

      Now play well

    20. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have no opinion one way or the other. I just found your post amusing.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    21. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget the internet age equivalent, "Lego's".

    22. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by 3TimeLoser · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh yes there is. Sheeps are the sounds drunk birds make.

    23. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      The plural of Lego is Lego NOT Legos! I'm getting fed up with every slashdot article on Lego getting this wrong, and a huge portion of the debate being about the pluralisation not the story.

      ... and therefore you fire this debate up again?

    24. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ah, another attempt to dictate the natural evolution of language. Let me be the first to say, Legos, Legos, Legos, Legos, Legos!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    25. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      but there are no such things as sheeps.
      Nonsense! Columbus and his crew sailed to the new world on three sheeps.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    26. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by miller701 · · Score: 1

      Well, the SCRABBLE tiles are all caps, so the name should be too. (Wonders if copycat scrabble sets are lower case)

    27. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans have a tendency of butchering english completely.

      Such things as "anyways" or "could care less"
      Sadly - they just don't care - sure they might sound stupid when they say it - and that's fine, we all make mistakes, it's when you correct them and they insist they don't care or their way is right.

      meh.

    28. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Obviously it's different in the states, but here in .au, the only people to call their bricks "Legos" tend to be uneducated titrats from the burbs whos parents are only 15 years older than they are, and think every house needs a Kingswood out the front with grass growing out of the bonnet.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    29. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like sheep. You can have a box of sheep, you can build things out of sheep bricks, but there are no such things as sheeps.

      Or how an Earthling is somebody from Earth.

      And a Vulcan is somebody from Vulcan.

    30. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by VanessaE · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the Wikipedia article:


      "The word LEGO® is a brand name and is very special to all of us in the LEGO Group Companies. We would sincerely like your help in keeping it special. Please always refer to our bricks as 'LEGO Bricks or Toys' and not 'LEGOS.' By doing so, you will be helping to protect and preserve a brand of which we are very proud and that stands for quality the world over. Thank you! Susan Williams, Consumer Services."

      That should settle this arguement once and for all, as this exact statement can be found on some boxes of bricks as well (though neither of the two I have handy).

    31. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1
      So, if you're fed up with the debate about pluralization taking over the discussion instead of the actual story, why is it that you are the first one to bring it up? Hmmm? :)
      So, if you're fed up with people making posts about the debate about pluralization taking over the discussion instead of the actual story, why is it that you are replying to him? Hmmm? :)

      So if you don't like people replying to posts about people complaining about the way pluralization takes over the discussion instead of the story, why are you replying to his post about people complaining about the way pluralization takes over the discussion instead of the story?

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    32. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by jrockway · · Score: 1
      Americans have a tendency of butchering English completely.

      Such things as "anyways" or "could care less"
      Sadly - they just don't care - sure they might sound stupid when they say it - and that's fine, we all make mistakes, it's when you correct them and they insist they don't care or their way is right.


      Americans think the British (and Australian) variants of English sound odd, too. "Boot"? That's a thing that goes on my foot, you idiot :)

      The sooner you start thinking of those variants of English as separate languages, the sooner you can start worrying about a more important problem. One doesn't complain about Spanish speakers not using British English... why would one be concerned that speakers of American English aren't speaking British English? I don't see the difference, other than that American English has borrowed a lot more words from British English than has Spanish.

      (And BTW, I don't know of anyone who uses either of those terms above. Maybe you only have opportunities to interact with dumb people? ;)
      --
      My other car is first.
    33. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time saying that little circle-R... so I substitute and "s"!

    34. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      May the Jedis strike your virii infested boxen down with their army of trained octopii!

      *assplode*

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    35. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by syousef · · Score: 1

      My children will be taught that copyright and intellectual property law is there only to further the progress of art and science, not for the purpose of furthering jobs or corporate profits

      So you're going to teach them about the world the way it ought to be instead of what it is? Poor kids will suffer for it you know.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    36. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Who died, and appointed you supreme dictator of the English language?

      In other words, some of use could care less.

    37. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by lekikui · · Score: 1

      Nope, it isn't.

      I have a copycat Scrabble set.

      --
      "Lisp ... made me aware that software could be close to executable mathematics." - L. Peter Deutsch
    38. Re:How many times do we have to say it? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      brickOS, a replacement firmware for the Lego Mindstorms RCX, was formerly called "legOS". So no, it doesn't run on standard x86 hardware. *ahem*

      (I personally find it very annoying to read "Legos". I think it must be an American thing, I'd never heard of anyone calling Lego bricks "Legos" until reading Slashdot.)

  6. Ouch by tttonyyy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just love the way the factory floor has all sorts of bits of Lego scattered across it (the Lego that escaped!)

    I bet they don't walk around with bare feet there. :)

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:Ouch by oc255 · · Score: 1

      Yeah that picture made me laugh too. Remember how the really small two peg pieces would embed into your foot? Ow, pointy.

    2. Re:Ouch by bloobloo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Same as the nitric acid plant I used to work at then!

    3. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was I the only disapointed to see than the machinery in the plant wasn't made of tiny colored bricks?

    4. Re:Ouch by kalleguld · · Score: 1

      A turning complete LEGO factory? Exiting!

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health
  7. But the article didn't say ... by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    That they'd been making 18 billion parts per year since 1958. While the installed base of Lego bricks is enormously vast, I highly doubt that they reached a production level billions of parts per year before the eighties or even the nineties.

    1. Re:But the article didn't say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on... does it really matter? I don't give a rip if it was only 18 billion parts per year since 2000. It still a ton of bricks! Ok...next someone out there will weigh a lego brick and tell us how much 18 billion really weighs. Go ahead you know you want to. And yes I know not all the parts are bricks.

  8. Studies on developmental outcome? by Lethyos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has there been any research studying the effects of playing with Legos on mental development in children? It seems intuitive to me and probably others here that there is some positive correlation if not outright causality between these types of toys and intelligence.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by stormeru · · Score: 0

      It sure has a positive effect as long as the child actually builds something else that the default model. As a child who played a lot with Lego I was building a lot of tunnels, bridges, train stations and similar buildings for my electric train toys. The possibilities were endless. A child has a lot of imagination, he can build his own world and Lego is a great tool for that.

    2. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by bdonalds · · Score: 3, Funny
      Has there been any research studying the effects of playing with Legos on mental development in children? It seems intuitive to me and probably others here that there is some positive correlation if not outright causality between these types of toys and intelligence.


      Well, I played with Legos (sorry...Lego brand brick-type plastic blocks), and I'm fucking brilliant!

      :)
      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    3. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by Meneguzzi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or perhaps the correlation of kids who played with legos that turned out to be car engineers in the 80s (you know, with lots of straight angles). Perhaps that explains the stylistic choices of the time...

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
    4. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that children that play with LEGO bricks have better spatial reasoning but show little to no improvement in cognitive reasoning.

    5. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well, I played with Legos (sorry...Lego brand brick-type plastic blocks), and I'm fucking brilliant!
      Unfortunately, as a counter-anecdote, I also played with Lego as a child, and I'm as dumb as a sackful of hammer handles.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just bought my kids a DVD of other kids playing with legos and creating really neat toys. It's cheaper then buying all of those expensive legos and the kids on the DVD are far more creative than my kids. It's kind of like New Yankee Workshop for little children.

    7. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by pacalis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh? Maybe if you drew a picture...

    8. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      Do the Legos cause smart kids, or do only smart kids like Lego? It's hard to say. I do think it's interesting that many people build elaborate houses of Lego (me) or working cars (my brothers) but it seems that fewer people build both.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    9. Re:Studies on developmental outcome? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Taco is a Lego fan, does that help you out any?

  9. Fahrenhuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "After being vacuumed up, the ABS granules are moved toward the molding machines, where they are melted at a temperature of 449.6 degrees Fahrenheit."

    I'm sorry, I don't speak caveman. What's that in a real temperature?

    1. Re:Fahrenhuh? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Informative

      505.15 kelvin

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Fahrenhuh? by platyk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm interesting that it's almost the same in degrees Fahrenheit and kelvin. That inspired me to figure out that:
      574.5875 degrees Fahrenheit is exactly 574.5875 kelvin.

    3. Re:Fahrenhuh? by apt142 · · Score: 1

      Where's my +1 Nerd mod when I need it?

    4. Re:Fahrenhuh? by dctoastman · · Score: 1

      Work it backwards from the formula:

      K = ((5/9)(F - 32)) + 273.15

      Now assuming K = F, and isolating a constant:
      K - ((5/9)(K - 32)) = 273.15

      Multiplying 5/9 into the subtraction:
      K - ((5K - 160)/9) = 273.15

      Bringing the other K into the mix:
      (9K - 5K + 160)/9 = 273.15

      Consolidating the K's and multiplying both sides by the constant, 9:
      4K + 160 = 2458.35

      Subtract the constant 160:
      4K = 2298.35

      Divide by the constant 4:
      574.5875

  10. This is 1950's technology folks by Salvance · · Score: 1

    This would have been far more interesting if they showed how they made some of their more advanced kits, robots, and intricate pieces, instead of just showing their injection molding process for a simple little block. Their production #'s are impressive, but who really cares how the 1950's technology behind making a Lego?

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
  11. You still have to use your imagination! by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    You can't just stick those fancy pieces anywhere, you have to think about what you're doing or else the funny shapes obstruct somewhere else you wanted to put something.

    (yeah, I've done that a lot. The Technic stuff can be a nightmare to figure out sometimes.)

    1. Re:You still have to use your imagination! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe people complaining about the custom pieces. Every kid gets a 300 or more box of basic Lego blocks for one of their birthdays, and then all they need is one uncle smart enough to buy them one cheap windows and doors bag (on sale in Alkmaar, NL for just 6 euro) and they can make 3 to 6 houses to the design they see in their own street. Who cares about the custom cars and monsters that travel these streets, its simply nice that they are also Lego so they can be stuck on to something without falling over.

      Yes, the market for complete houses is dead, but who needs a 50 euro model house when a few basic blocks and some windows also make a convincing house? It's up to you to give the kids their basics and once you've shown them how to make a house or two and they will make custom scenery for every adventure they play out.

  12. "To" is not "too" !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it to easy..."What is up with people being too lazy to type another o to spell too correctly? There is a difference between to and too!!!

    1. Re:"To" is not "too" !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heil teh Grammer Nazi!

  13. Noted my misspelling. by Lethyos · · Score: 0

    It has been pointed out that “Legos” is incorrect. My apologies.

    --
    Why bother.
  14. Obligatory: Just Imagine a Beowolf Cluster ... by powerlord · · Score: 1, Funny
    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    1. Re:Obligatory: Just Imagine a Beowolf Cluster ... by zaliph · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing. How about a concerto with one of these:

      http://www.henrylim.org/Harpsichord.html

    2. Re:Obligatory: Just Imagine a Beowolf Cluster ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, that's refreshingly crazy. :)

  15. Correct me if I'm wrong, but ... by brokeninside · · Score: 3, Informative

    But if Sigma Six measures defects per million opportunities does that not mean that each successfully produced Lego brick counts as more than one opportunity? Since there are multiple points of possible failure during the production of each brick, a defect rate of 4 per multiple millions of parts produced would be well beyond sigma six.

    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong, but ... by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. I'm no export on Six Sigma, but my company is heavily into it, and I had to go to the introductory course. Opertunities would include colour, shape, hardness of the plastic, just to name a few. One perfect lego block could represent a dozen or more opertunities for error.

    2. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong, but ... by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      glad to see I'm not the only one with GI Joe on the mind... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.I._Joe:_Sigma_6

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  16. Hmm by Genocaust · · Score: 1

    the process is so air tight that only 18 of 1 million pieces are considered defectiveMaybe Sony could take a note from this?

    --
    It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Sony could first try to produce 1 million PS3.

    2. Re:Hmm by Meatloaf+Surprise · · Score: 1
      the process is so air tight that only 18 of 1 million pieces are considered defective

      Sony could just as easily say 18 in 1 million batteries, cameras, etc of theirs are considered defective too

  17. Lego my eggo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were Intel they woulda sued Kellogs for using that slogan leggo my eggo. They, on the other hand, just went another route... http://www.strangenewproducts.com/2006/02/lego-sha ped-eggos.html

  18. Why a Lego article in Businessweek? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Why a Lego article in Businessweek?

    I guess I expected to see a story about how Lego's sales have dropped off recently because kids aren't as interested in Legos or (as in my sons' case) inherited so many damn Legos there's really no point in buying any more. Or maybe something about how the company has refocused on name brand licensing in the past 10 years, with tie-ins to Harry Potter, Star Wars and anyone else with a children's movie.

    But a "how are ordinary plastic bricks" made in Businessweek? Strange...

    1. Re:Why a Lego article in Businessweek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they mentioned not long ago in the Danish news that LEGO was having a hard time keeping up with the production of bricks for this years demand. They said this is due to the fact that the Danish brick factory was moved to an Eastern European country to lower costs.

    2. Re:Why a Lego article in Businessweek? by Bob-taro · · Score: 1
      ... inherited so many damn Legos there's really no point in buying any more ...
      That's an interesting point.
      (FTA) ... the LEGO Group is producing 15 billion components a year ...
      Maybe if they make their product too durable, they'll hit a saturation point. I mean, there're only so many children in the world.
      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  19. Decline in quality? by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't LEGO outsource their fabrication off to some other company earlier this year? I'm pretty sure it was a fairly long transition, so we may not be seeing these new pieces yet, but the sets I've bought in the past year seem "different" somehow. Colors don't seem as solid as they were years ago, and the plastic feels softer. They still snap together pretty well, but they don't seem to fit against each other as well and seams can be much bigger than I remember.

    While I'm sure the machinery and manufacture process isn't changing, it would have been nice if the article could have commented on the changes being made in response to the restructuring LEGO has been doing the past couple years. It's pretty obvious to me that things are changing, but it'd be nice to have it documented.

    1. Re:Decline in quality? by smitty97 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think there has been a decline in quality, it just happened earlier. New part's molds seem to have much larger radii on the corners and a rougher texture (like the mold pressure wasnt high enough), while old parts have sharp corners and a smooth finish. The best example i can find is to compare an early 80's technic bush (http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/3713) with one from a 2000+ kit.. the new ones are different enough to make them unusable for some things, like attaching an axle perpendicular to a plate. the new bushings's mating features on the one side are all rounded off, and do not fit very tight. To make matters worse, an extra circular ring under the mating areas ensures that it doesnt sit flat like the old ones. A comparison of old/new gears (http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/x187) as well will show the differences. The photos on the links show the new parts. has anyone else noticed differences like this?

      --
      mod me funny
    2. Re:Decline in quality? by uradu · · Score: 1

      That was my thought exactly. The pieces I used to play with in the 70s and early 80s had seams so tight you could rarely see through. The ones I buy my kids now are a far cry from that, and it hasn't been just in the last year or so, it's been quite a few years. You can see light through all seams now, with many you can even squeeze a sheet of paper in. It also looks like the pieces are not as flat anymore, many having slight indentations and dimples on smooth surfaces, almost like the plastic isn't thick or hard enough and the piece distorted while cooling. While Megablocks are still total crap compared to Lego, it sadly seems that the difference is shrinking in the direction of Megablocks.

  20. Isn't this all... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ...about the actual defective blocks that are *found* ? I mean, if 18 per million are defective, and all 18 are removed from the process, isn't this effectively better than 3.4 ppm of which all 3 are *not* removed from the process ?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Isn't this all... by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      Then you've got a "hidden factory" doing the reprocessing/removal. In something like a lego block that's not really a problem, but in a real plant I know of (which I am not going to divulge) there is a 4% reject rate of product. This is what happens when you let chemists run it instead of employing chemical engineers though!

  21. Re: A small addition by DrRobert · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually it depends on how you define your test metric. In our industry we define the failure as ppm in the final unit for a particular test (color, shape, weight, hardnes). In a complete report you would different ppm failure rates for different aspects of the process.

  22. Re: A small addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yah know. Talk like this is exactly why no one thinks geeks are fun.

  23. Translation by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > What has six sigma added to this paradigm?

    A word that we, monolingual americans, can understand.

    1. Re:Translation by hswerdfe · · Score: 3, Funny

      would that word be six or sigma?

      --
      --meh--
    2. Re:Translation by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lets go with six. Sigma still sounds foreign and I don't know what it means...

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    3. Re:Translation by JoGlo · · Score: 1

      I thought that it was an old car from Mitsubishi, so perhaps Demming was involved, after all!

      --
      Will those of you who think that you know what you are doing, get out of the way of those of us who know what we are doi
    4. Re:Translation by Dabido · · Score: 1

      'Sigma still sounds foreign'

      To quote Shakespeare. It all sounds Greek to me!

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  24. Re:I for one.. by BadMrMojo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I for one welcome our new multi-colored, combinable overlords! ... Voltron?

  25. 915,103,765 different combinations by LotsOfPhil · · Score: 1

    "the LEGO Group has calculated that just six eight-stud bricks can be arranged in 915,103,765 different ways."
    Can anyone reproduce this for me?

    --
    This post climbed Mt. Washington.
    1. Re:915,103,765 different combinations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:915,103,765 different combinations by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll give it a stab, but I'm a bit rusty on the combinatory factorials. Let's see 8!*6!*8!/2!*... blech, screw that, let's count them:

      ____::::_::::
      ______::::
      _____::::
      ___::::_::::

      That's one.

      ___::::__::::__::::
      _____::::__::::__::::

      That's two.

      Umm, I think this might take awhile, will you still be online in 15,000 years?

      And here's a bunch of random text to get rid of the lameness filter.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:915,103,765 different combinations by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      That would make a cool Linux OpenGL screensaver... rearrange the bricks in all 915,102,765 combinations.

  26. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot has always been the stuff that Taco thinks is interesting.

    Coming here and demanding that he changes his editorial policy seems slightly odd.

  27. Typical Lego Post by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    What? No mention of how the current lego kits all tell you what to build (spaceships, castles, etc.) while in the "Good old days" all we had were buckets of bricks and our imagination?

  28. Injection moulding by nuggz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yawn, standard manufacturing technology in industry.

    The details of what happens are cool, but every company making moulded thermoplastics does the same thing.
    The machines at LEGO aren't any different than those making toothpaste caps or rubbermaid containers, it's just a cooler product to geeks.

    1. Re:Injection moulding by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      And a well-placed PR piece to remind parents about LEGO products during the holidays.

      (Yes, I can be cynical about products I love).

      The problem I see with LEGO is that you only need so many bricks. By making things very specialized they've bypassed that (oh, this set has a pirate ghost) but at some point you have enough basic pieces that you can make anything you want. Which is of course the reason people buy LEGO bricks in the first place.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    2. Re:Injection moulding by Peyna · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It appears to be much more like a compression molding system than an injection molding one.

      --
      What?
  29. LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've actually seen (well, as far as you can "see") Lego bricks in production. Up until this year when they announced they were going to close it (as part of moving all their production to Eastern Europe, China, or Mexico), Lego ran a factory in Connecticut. Once upon a time, they used to allow kids to tour it. I must have been in middle school or so when I saw it.

    IIRC, there's nothing particularly special about the production process. It's basic injection-molding. The plastic comes in bulk as small pellets, pre-dyed (I think, I'm a little fuzzy on this), and gets fed into machines that produce the bricks. I don't think that they make or dye the plastic on-site. The vast majority of the plant, as I remember it, was actually devoted to inspection, sorting/packing, and packaging for shipment. At the time this really surprised me; the "making stuff" part of the factory was far smaller than I had thought. It was cool to see them wheeling around big bins of bricks, though. (This was before they made quite as many special pieces as they seem to now.) I really should have brought a camera but never thought about it at the time. (I think I was probably in that period of life where I was trying hard not to show that I still thought Legos were really cool.) Somebody else visited and has a few photos here.

    About the only thing I never worked out is how they get them to release from the molds so cleanly, and with such straight walls (normally to guarantee mold release you avoid straight walls and sharp edges/corners). On some bricks if you look closely though, you can see mold lines and sprues if you look in the bottom carefully.

    It's sad to hear that they're closing the plant in CT; I had always hoped that maybe it was heavily automated enough to cope with the higher costs of labor in a high-cost area, but it seems not. I wonder what this leaves for industry in Connecticut these days? Without Lego, their principal exports are going to be nothing but a handful of helicopter parts and lawyers.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by Inda · · Score: 4, Informative
      About the only thing I never worked out is how they get them to release from the molds so cleanly...

      The plastic shrinks as is cools. Simple as that.

      Yes, I used to make plastic injection moulding tools. Well, that's a lie, I made the patterns that were used to cast the dies. A hammer wielding Toolmaker made the tools, obviously.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      About the only thing I never worked out is how they get them to release from the molds so cleanly, and with such straight walls (normally to guarantee mold release you avoid straight walls and sharp edges/corners). On some bricks if you look closely though, you can see mold lines and sprues if you look in the bottom carefully.

      I've done a little reading about this. As another poster stated, the plastic shrinks as it cools, so you must release the part from the mold quickly. This is usually done by push-pins that are embedded in the die itself. My best guess is that ths works because ABS is fairly rigid well before it completely cools off.

      If you look at anything of lower quality than a LEGO that is made of ABS, you can sometimes see where these push pins made contact with the (then soft) plastic. They kind of look like shallow circular or semi-circular depressions, almost always on the interior/hidden side of the part.

    3. Re:LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      We've got all the big insurance companies (Hartford is aka "The insurance capital of the world"), and a machining industry, United Technologies (Pratt & Whitney, Sikorsky, Hamilton Sunstrand, etc), Kaman, General Electric Industrial.... Connecticut is pretty decent, could always be better though

      It is sad to see Lego go, :( Don't 'lego my Lego!

    4. Re:LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      [i]About the only thing I never worked out is how they get them to release from the molds so cleanly, and with such straight walls[/i] Just a guess... They use draft angles as in any mould, so in the mould the brick is tapered. However, the brick may be a little thicker near the bottom side than near the top side, leading to extra shrinkage at the bottom (pulling the brick straight).

    5. Re:LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The plastic comes in bulk as small pellets, pre-dyed (I think, I'm a little fuzzy on this), and gets fed into machines that produce the bricks

      Yeah, my Dad is a process engineer at one of the facilities that makes such pellets. Nobody ever thinks about the intermediate stage between plastic production and its use in products, but it takes the form of railcars full of insane amounts of little plastic pellets. It turns out that it requires surprisingly few production locations to make the vast amounts of plastic that gets used. All the intrinsic characteristics of a particular plastic are present in the pellets when they're shipped -- color, pliability, fire-resistance, you name it. Interestingly, the color of plastic used in certain types of items can be under trademark, as specified by the usual color measures we're familiar with through image display/printing/storage technology. So when people order a shipment of pellets to make green farming equipment with, they have to make sure the hue and saturation don't fall within John Deere's domain.

    6. Re:LEGO Factory in Enfield, CT by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      The plastic shrinks as is cools. Simple as that.

      There is also something called draft angle. I now forget how I knew this.

  30. That's NOT a LEGO computer. THIS a LEGO computer by hmbcarol · · Score: 1

    Those are boxes made from LEGO which happen to house modern computers.

    This is a computing device MADE from LEGO... Three digits of mean hand cranked polynomial goodness. Only 105 turns of the crank per quadratic result!

    http://acarol.woz.org/

    Computing the way Babbage intended!
    // Yes, this is a shameless plug for my own machine...

  31. I've reproduced it for you by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    "the LEGO Group has calculated that just six eight-stud bricks can be arranged in 915,103,765 different ways."

    How's that?

    I'm all set up now and can do more copies whenever you want.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:I've reproduced it for you by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      I'm running low on semicolons, care to share?

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    2. Re:I've reproduced it for you by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      If you check the OP I was making a (weak) joke. Funny for me who's been ITing for a printshop today though.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    3. Re:I've reproduced it for you by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      heh, I got the joke, and I was just making a weak(er) one ;)

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
  32. Re:Typical Lego Post by petabyte · · Score: 1

    I grew up with the kits so they've been doing that for awhile. Today there aren't as many choices - I always liked the space ones and now everything has to be god awfull starwars crap.

    Even with the kits, you'd play with the spaceships and eventually, you'd drop them, or they'd break apart in the bucket you stored them in. Then you got to build your own creations from the debris. The best of both worlds :).

  33. I got a tour of the LEGO factory once by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1
    Several years ago I visited their factory in Connecticut. It was a very interesting few hours, and I got to see just about every aspect of how the bricks are made.

    I even managed to hold a few of them in my bare hands while they were still warm out of the molding machine!

    1. Re:I got a tour of the LEGO factory once by ZOMFF · · Score: 1

      Do you have any information regarding the exact address of the factory? I've lived in CT all my life and figure I should go take a tour of the factory before they close it and move their production to Mexico. All I know is it is in Enfield.

      --
      Launch every sig.
    2. Re:I got a tour of the LEGO factory once by ummit · · Score: 1
    3. Re:I got a tour of the LEGO factory once by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1

      The 'L' shaped building is Compass House - office space and headquarters. The larger building just to the left was the manufacturing and packing facility. The building to the north is warehouse and distribution (look for all trucks!), you can see the original part on top, then several years ago they doubled the size with an addition on the bottom. Lego built the road from the manufacturing building to the warehouse, so they had a shorter route for the trucks hauling the finished and packaged sets to the warehouse...

  34. Why else? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, I play legos with my kids....

    Well, I'd hope so. It's the best reason for having kids, really.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Why else? by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same idea here!!!!!

  35. when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Your imagination has been rendered obsolete.
    In fact, your imagination has been patented, and you will be prosecuted if caught using it again.
    In place of your obsolete, patented imagination you will now swallow any pill presented by the media: resistance is feudal.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination by DerKlempner · · Score: 1

      resistance is feudal.

      I hate it when fighting back automatically transports me to the Middle Ages and throws me into the middle of a caste system...

      --
      UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
    2. Re:when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination by rootEToTheIPi · · Score: 1

      Der Klempner, eh? And how did you get that? By 'angin on to our dated imperialistic dogma which perpetuates the social and economic differences in our society!

      --
      When it comes to pastry theft, I take the cake.
  36. and here with pretty moving pictures by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.popandco.com/archive/moab/

    i love this animation set.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  37. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The legos deep six you.

  38. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Am I? Hoookay... And your name is Billy.

  39. Ten out of ten for style... by caveat · · Score: 1

    ...but minus several million for sound quality.

    Seriously, I didn't even get halfway through the sample mp3. I blanch at the thought of the Well-Tempered Clavier on this..
    It's an _awesome_ (in every sense of the word) piece of work to be sure, but it's better off just on display.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  40. Lego: annoying by timothy · · Score: 1

    a) Sure, of course Lego is pretty neat. You can make things from it.I especially like large-scale models with difficult engineering skills on offer (suspension bridges, etc).

    b) Under most circumstances, I really do mean *you* can make things from it. For most purposes, I'd much rather have plain wooden blocks, or tinkertoys, or a box full of random vaguely stackable stuff-thing-items.

    Lego are too 90-degrees, snap-to-grid oriented. Just like in a drawing program, snap-to-grid is sometimes nice, but I usually get annoyed by it, and would rather give it up as an option than have it on full-time. Blocks and other things can be manipulated to the degree of precision the user has to apply.

    I wish these blocks (Kapla) weren't so expensive:

    http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/000620.php

    Also, I feel bad about any permantization of lego constructions -- it's like building models out of pennies, then welding them all together. If something's made out of scrap and leftovers, I feel no such compunction.

    And the colors! Sure, the enthusiast will have barrels of all the right colors he needs for a 3D Mona Lisa reconstruction, but mostly I've seen piles of cloying, crayon-pack colors. Never enough black, never enough grey, never enough light blue.

    Hmm. Maybe I should put in action my plan to buy lego whenever I see them in thrift stores, so I could have enough to not feel bad if they're tied up in one thing rather than another, and to get enough of a decent color choice.

    But still, that limited range of motion! The perpendicular angles thing!

    Also, I don't know if lego tech has vastly improved, but as a kid I always wanted the interlocking sections to be just slightly grippier. After all, if we're going to live with them, might as well get the maximum benefit! It's too easy for a lego skyscraper to crack in the middle -- they're too susceptible to lateral force!

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  41. qua? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it to easy..."

    While I am sure they are going in the direction of easy, you probably intended to say that kids these days have it too easy.

    THE PANDA STRIKES AGAIN!

  42. Relax by Kandei-chan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There may be places where you need to speak apologetically about your use of LEGO. Slashdot is not one of them.

    1. Re:Relax by Himring · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I am baffled by your post (it makes no sense to me) and the fact it is modded up. Can someone explain?

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  43. Depends how long ago. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From 1975 to 2006 they made a lot of stuff for the U.S. market in their factory in Enfield, Connecticut. (Which apparently was quite the state-of-the-art operation when it was constructed.) You can read the local paper's article about the first round of layoffs here.

    Ultimately, their plan is to offshore everything including manufacturing and logistics. The Enfield operations will mostly go to Mexico and China, where the production is being subcontracted out to Flextronics; about a third of their headquarters factory in Denmark is being cut, with production moving to the Czech Republic.

    Apparently they're going to keep making some of the Bionicle parts in the Billund factory, but the writing is pretty much on the wall: it's all headed East eventually.

    As for the apparent decline in quality, I can't find any information on whether they've started to ramp up production from Flextronics or the Czech factories yet, or if they have, how long it would take those parts to get into circulation (the layoffs in CT only started in 3Q2006) so I'm not sure that the decline is attributable to offshoring quite yet. It could just be that simultaneous with or prior to the decisions to move production, they attempted to cut costs by reducing QC expenditures, and that's why things have slipped.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  44. "Stud" by FirmWarez · · Score: 1

    Sad that whoever wrote TFA isn't a real Lego person. Otherwise he'd know the correct terminology isn't "stud" but "bump". Kids never say "I need a six studded block", rather a "six-bump".

    1. Re:"Stud" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary. The correct word to use is stud. And it applies to both the so-called bumps on top, and the round structures on the bottom. See the useage on Peeron or LUGNET

    2. Re:"Stud" by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      Otherwise he'd know the correct terminology isn't "stud" but "bump".

      Kids might incorrectly say 'bump', but Lego does refer to the bumps as studs.

      Though the typo on slide 4: "three-spud" is amusing

  45. priced that way too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and when you're buying legos, it feels like you're buying a set of real tires too.

    I always wondered how such small plastic pieces can possibly cost so much. So far I've spent like 200$ on legos, and I'd have to spend at least that much again to have what I'd call an "acceptable set" (need stuff like minifigures, baseplates, wheels, doors & windows badly).

    The base plates? (very thin) 8$, or 15$ for the large one!
    The set of 30 or so basic minifigures? Over 60$! (can't buy less at a time either!)

    Isn't PVC dirt cheap? And from the article, seemingly there's almost no labor involved, the plastic injection/molding machines and conveyors and such are all automated.

    1. Re:priced that way too by Himring · · Score: 1

      Oh they are pricey. Kid's toys are pricey anyhow, but legos are very much so. I guess it's like movie popcorn: it isn't the cost of the substance, but the atmosphere you're buying....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    2. Re:priced that way too by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      It's ABS, not PVC. And the cost of the raw material is one of the least expensive contributors to the price, particularly for one-sey two-sey (or 30-sey) spare parts. Really what you are paying for is the premium ALL manufacturers place on spare parts. Do you have any idea how much a Hyundai would cost if you bought it one part at a time? Or a TV? Manufacturers charge a lot for these items in part because it is a non-standard method for selling them, the volumes are much smaller than for their normal product, and because they can.

      --
      -
    3. Re:priced that way too by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      yeah its not the cheapest contstruction toy,

      the quality is good though lego (provided its not decades old or badly chewed etc) ALWAYS fits lego easilly and yet grips well by friction, getting that kind of repeatable long life friction grip with plastic parts can't be easy.

      Its not such an issue with building say model houses but the adivce i always got was if you are building a technic model and wan't to use ordinary bricks in them make sure they are genuine lego ones.

      P.S. always use a brick seperator even if it seems a pain, biting lego bricks leads to them not fitting so closely which screws up many technic designs.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:priced that way too by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      True, they're not cheap. But I've got blocks in the kids' pile that were handed down TO me. There are FEW toys that survive childhood boredom, Mom's cleaning, and the ravages of being played with as well as Legos. I have blocks 30 years old that snap perfectly with ones fresh out of the box... That's way cool... and justifies their legend status.

  46. Bah, Lego. Real geeks (of any age) use ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    Fischertechnik, of course.



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischertechnik



    Not as much visual appeal and pretty colors, but way more functional.

  47. So true by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    "Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff."

    Sadly, I think a lot of us here still do.

    --
    /* No Comment */
  48. Excellent quality control/customer service by Comboman · · Score: 1

    In 30 years of buying Lego (first for myself and now for my son), I'm impressed that I only once bought a set (last year) that had a single missing piece. I called the 1-800 number on the box and the agent talked me through a long but obviously well documented process to determine exactly which part was missing. The part arrived in a couple of days and my son's T-Rex had it's tail joint. If only all companies had that kind of customer service.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  49. When i was young... by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it to easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff."

    ...and we had to walk 15 miles to and from school... in snow storms.... uphill... both ways!

    1. Re:When i was young... by actor_au · · Score: 1

      And who do you think built that hill? Out of LEGO blocks no less? Before we went to school every day? In the snow? Yeah, you kids had it easy.

      --
      Read Errant Story.
    2. Re:When i was young... by Irishkayaker · · Score: 1

      ...and we had to walk 15 miles to and from school... in snow storms.... uphill... both ways!

      ....and we had no such things as vitamins either! We had to suck the minerals out of ROCKS!

  50. Good stuff. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    This is interesting timing considering I bought my first lego set in years just a couple of weeks ago.

    I have to say building blocks, and legos in particular, are some of the best toys out there. These toys require decent visual-spacial abilities to assemble and very basic understanding of structures and engineering concepts, at least if you don't want something to collapse on your. And probably more importantly they inspire the imagination. There's not much out there that is quite this good, not even most so-called learning toys. Even computers I don't think necessarily provide as much value, at least not when kids do nothing but chat, visit mySpace and play games.

    I do have to add that I don't quite like what I've seen from Lego in recent years with all the overly custom parts. I don't really like the who Bionicle line either, but I do understand Lego's need to stay relevant. And they seem to have addressed some of the issues with the custom pieces more recently.

  51. Mod parent up by patio11 · · Score: 1

    I like smart-alecky comments as much as the next guy but that article is like the perfect blend of geek and genius with a bit of CS thrown in. Let's have everyone see it.

  52. Lego... by ettlz · · Score: 1

    is a collective noun!

    1. Re:Lego... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be assimilated.

  53. Automated process? What the hell? by east+coast · · Score: 0

    I carve my own Lego out of bricks of solid gold! I've never had a defective one yet!

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  54. I have a big tub of lego by Centurix · · Score: 1

    From when I was a kid, that and a tub of stuff called Tente which I collected for a number of years. It was a Spanish building block with lots of themed stuff and specialised pieces, I'm not sure if they're still around. They weren't compatible with Lego blocks though.

    The problem with having a big tub of lego is that it's never just lego in the tub, like you'll find odd little things in there too, like plastic rings from the fairground, matchbox cars, maybe some playdough stuck to a flat piece of lego.

    --
    Task Mangler
  55. Mega Bloks on How It's Made by telso · · Score: 1

    The hypnotising show about manufacturing, How It's Made, covered Mega Bloks a few seasons ago. Sadly, I can't find the video online, so you'll have to find it on TV (The Science Channel in the US, as well as many of the Discovery Channels), but you can be hyponotized by other of their videos on YouTube, although considering the drop in frame rate on YouTube, this is one of the worst shows to watch online.

  56. LEGO 2nd most reputable by vuzman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Incidentally, the LEGO company is the second most reputable company in the world, according to Forbes.

    1. Re:LEGO 2nd most reputable by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Incidentally, the LEGO company is the second most reputable company in the world, according to Forbes.
      I skimmed that article, and it's not clear that they're using "reputable" properly, as half the time it just seems to mean "well known" e.g. Tesco came top in the UK because everyone's heard of it, and it has a reasonably good image. Big deal.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  57. Legos legos legos legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Legos legos legos.

    Legos.

    Bite me, nitpicking asshat.

  58. Too Easy? by panda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it too easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

    Actually, my daughter and I were making houses, cars and furniture with her LEGO bricks last night, and I commented to my wife that it was more fun when I was younger and the pieces were more generic. It feels like you're being coerced into building the specific sets on the box because the custom pieces aren't that good for much else, though you can come up with a really wacky-looking couch for your little lego people to sit on. ;)

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    1. Re:Too Easy? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I agree that the customized peices limit you too much. Granted they look pretty but when I was a kid the generic pieces allowed me to build pretty much anything. I built models of the capital building, sailing ships, bridges between furniture, etc. Now if you buy a kit you get the thing on the box and little else. You're better off getting generic block sets.

      The other kits I really loved were the advanced kits. They allowed you to building "working" piston engines, rack-and-pinion steering systems, etc. They were great and really let you try some complex things. Perfect for older kids with an engineering knack.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Too Easy? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's just your imagination dying from age.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Promote Parent to Front Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, that article is more interesting than the BusinessWeek one that's on the front page. Not only Mod Parent Up; put parent on Page One.

  60. Tired of whining about "special" pieces. by gfxguy · · Score: 0

    I'm getting tired of people complaining about "special" pieces. Whine, whine, whine. No one is forcing you to use them. Just because your building from 1979 was a piece of multi-colored garbage doesn't mean that's how it should be today.

    And while I admit they seem to be getting lazy about it (look at some of the new Lego City planes), you still need an imagination to use those pieces for your own models.

    I was happy, though, with the new Boeing 787 "Dreamliner" model. Yes, there's the engines and nose cone, but the rest of the plane is strictly bricks (or so it seems from close examination). It may be hard to tell from the website, I have the catalog in which it's quite clear, and quite unlike the other planes they've recently released.

    Moreover, Lego is really quite expensive - most models hover somewhere around the $0.10 per piece. This Boeing, despite being a licensed product, is way under that.

    And for purists, there's always Bricklink.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:Tired of whining about "special" pieces. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      I'm getting tired of people complaining about "special" pieces. Whine, whine, whine. No one is forcing you to use them. Just because your building from 1979 was a piece of multi-colored garbage doesn't mean that's how it should be today.

      The problem isn't simply the use of special pieces. Some of those are welcome and allow for creations that haven't been possible in the past. The problem is when they use these custom pieces instead of actually building out the section with smaller components. I can only assume this is done to cut corners. And the problem is when you end up with an overly polished looking set that barely looks like it was made from legos and you can't really do anything else with the overly custom parts.

    2. Re:Tired of whining about "special" pieces. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Follow the link to the dreamliner... I was really impressed with it. The only part I have a problem with is that the nose cone could have been done to a good approximation with plates, too. The engines not so much.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Tired of whining about "special" pieces. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      the engines and nose cone are still standard parts. The nose is a standard cone rocket engine with a mini satillite disc on top. Upon closer inspection the engines look to be made of standard slopped parts also. the cowl is a tire hub. quite a nice job of matching colors and shapes.

  61. Performance numbers are misleading by Secrity · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a long distance company that used to guarantee 99.9% availability for DS1 circuits, which sounded good at the time. Most customers didn't realize that guaranteed 99.9% availability meant that there could be over 8 hours of outage during a year.

    1. Re:Performance numbers are misleading by stevey · · Score: 1

      Here's a little cheat sheet for uptimes in percentage per-year:

      90% - 876 hours (36.5 days)
      95% - 438 hours (18.25 days)
      99% - 87.6 hours (3.65 days)
      99.9% - 8.76 hours
      99.99% -52.56 minutes

      ("five nines")
      99.999% - 5.256 minutes

      Finally,
      99.9999% - 31.536 seconds

  62. probably in the same era as... by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 0

    >> Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

    Probably in the same time where you could fix everything with duct tape and more nails.

    --
    If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    1. Re:probably in the same era as... by tehcyder · · Score: 0
      >> Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

      Probably in the same time where you could fix everything with duct tape and more nails.

      You had duct tape and nails? You were lucky. When I were a lad, it were string and pointy bits of wood. IF my dad had worked that year.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  63. Sure, but it's GOOD 1950's technology... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    and you can be sure that while the basics of squirting molten plastic into a mold and squeezing it with hydraulics haven't changed since the '50s, there are plenty of high tech temperature/pressure controls, servomotors, PLCs, etc. controlling that seemingly simple process. Factory automation has come a long way since injection molding started.

    Most people have absolutely no idea how something as simple as a Lego brick is made. Or the amount of skilled labor that is involved in making the molds and tooling used.

    I'm not sure what more you might see from looking at production of their more modern products, as at their core they are still injection molded plastic parts. Illustrating the process with the basic brick is probably a good idea, as nearly everyone has seen one at some point in their life.

    What the modern stuff adds is a lot of electronics, which is also mass-produced by automated machinery. If you want to see a typical example of a machine that stuffs and solders PC boards, look here:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-800147025 044780908&q=pick+and+place&hl=en

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  64. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, what's with the inadequacy and obsessing?

  65. Tales from The LEGO Factory by jpellino · · Score: 5, Informative

    Billund is still manufacturing, but it's moving to Czech Republic, real soon now.
    Enfield is moving its manufacturing and packing to Mexico, that should be complete by March.
    They'll be hoding an internal job fair sometime this winter - if you want some creative, dedicated folks, you'll find them there.

    Our FIRST team was sponsored by LEGO for several years until 1998 - we were working in their machine shop and got to see a great deal of the facility.
    Back around 1990 when the original LEGO TC Logo came out, we worked with them on a few projects.
    They're an amazing bunch, from the shop techs to the engineers to the line staff to the model team (still based in Enfield).

    There are bowls of LEGO on every conference table, not just for brand vanity, but for people to toy with as they discuss and solve problems. There's even an offshoot company, LEGO Serious Play that does corporate team training based on doing things with LEGO.

    One of their points of pride is that as they increased automation, they only displaced workers to other areas of the factory, they (at least back then) never tossed someone out of the site as their existing job was automated.

    In 1990 the packing lines were controlled by an amazing array of personal computers, Apple II, PC, I believe we even saw a few Commodores.

    They since standardized. The machines also page the engineering staff when there's an issue with one, this replaces the sound and light alarm they used to have.

    They've had two sorts of molding machines - one series that let the bricks and flashing fall through to sorters, and another where arms picked up the flashing and let the bricks drop. People touring would ask why some were robots (= had arms) and others weren't!

    Some of the parts are assembled on the lines, most are simply picked, sorted and packed into those perforated bags. If you notice the tiny dot on a minfig head, that's where the high-contrast optical system aligns each minifig head to the body. It's very cool to see.

    We had engineer/parents from other companies who used the same molding machines and could not believe the quality LEGO was getting - I believe their quoted tolerance was 3/1000 of an inch. Look for "gates" where the plastic entered the mold, or punches where the machine tapped the brick to free it - good luck finding either - then remember what your scale model kits looked like.

    First time through, we saw pallettes of boxes from Bayer. When I asked the engineers what they were getting from Germany, the answer was ABS plastic. Yes, they were shipping raw plastic over here, they're very particular - no metals allowed whatsoever. One of their engineers managed a program to get plastics from GE in Pittsfield MA 50 miles up the road to do the same thing - the savings reportedly bought them about 7 years time here in CT.

    There are no heaters per se in a LEGO molding machine - the pellets are fed through increasingly smaller feed tubes by arbors, and the pressure and friction creates the heat. When they hit the molds, the plastic is about the consistency of toothpaste. They have a rogues gallery of sculptures created by leaks.

    They filled a 55 gallon drum every night with the bricks that get swept off the floor - we offered to help them get rid of those, but they recycle them - I believe to a comb company.

    Our second year at FIRST, the robot was approximating an arm with a shoulder, elbow and wrist. The ergonomics of the standard joysticks and buttons were a real challenge. So the team built a "waldo" out of LEGO, where the operator could lay their hand into it, and the robot would respond to the movements of the hand. All was well until the judges reminded us that LEGO was not in the kit of parts of alllowables list. They did offer us the chance to take our allowance of PVC pipe and moplding LEGO bricks out of that, and building the waldo out of them. The two LEGO engineers looked like someone just suggested they use Waterford crystal to haul horse manure. We went back to joysticks.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  66. original LEGO US plant by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A *long* time ago, in about 1971, LEGO opened the first LEGO manufacturing plant outside Denmark -- or to be more specific, they licensed a Sampsonite company to produce LEGO bricks. It was in my hometown of Loveland, Colorado, and I can't find any good web links except for a passing reference in this pdf which is a shame because the original plant is still standing and its exterior design is clearly LEGO-influenced. The windows are enormous 1:2 rectangles with eight huge circular extrusions on them, just like a 2x4 cube.
    As kids, we all envied the children whose parents worked there because they'd come home with garbage bags of floor sweepings and those kids could build houses we could actually get inside. The local library had several models of famous houses/buildings that, again, were large enough to crawl into.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  67. Re:Typical Lego Post by Miseph · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and what's with the dearth of pirates? I'll give them some small credit with the new knights being fairly cool, but they've discontinued all the classics except for those damned trains nobody likes.

    Good thing my kids will inherit all my old LEGO bricks (happy yet, you soul-killing trademark Nazis?), and won't have to subsist entirely on the few new ones that are worthy.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  68. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please stop feeding the troll. It's painful to watch. :)

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  69. When I was a kid, we had to use our imagination by Pontiac · · Score: 2, Informative

    I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it too easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.Thats how I felt a couple years ago.. Almost every Lego kit I looked at would only build what was on the cover..

    My step sons new Technic 8288 Mobile Crane and a bunch of the kits out now remind me more of the old Lego I remember.

    Yeah the bricks are different.. most are just sticks with holes you link together but they open up new ways to build.

    I remember the Technic 8860 set I had as a kid.
    It built a car with working suspension, steering, rear differential, a 2 speed shifting transmission, 4 cylinder engine with a crank and pistons that turned when the car moved.

    Some of the stuff I see today is almost as cool as I remember that set was.
    I gave what I had left to the kids.. over half the sets are missing but they still have fun with em.

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  70. The article forgot...... by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

    to mention Brick Films.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  71. Re:Typical Lego Post by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    The old basic bucket with bricks, wheels windows and doors is still alive and well at your local Wal-Mart or target store.
    Hell it's the only one I see in stock all the time year round.

    Take a few basic tubs and mix in a technic kit or two and the kids can build about anything.

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  72. SlowNewsDay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this slownewsday tag bullshit?

    Is a 25+-ton-force injection-molding apparatus for producing some of the best geek toys around cool or is it not?

    Answer for the slow-of-wit: Yes, it's cool! It kicks ass on any news day.

  73. Its pretty easy, really. by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    First set realistic tolerances. Use with good quality raw material. Use good quality tooling. Use well trained, alert, and competent employees. Have quality control verify that everything is according to Hoyle. And most important: ELIMINATE EVERYTHING ELSE. If QC is finding bad parts, there is either something wrong with the material or something wrong with the tooling or (most likely) some unnecessary thing gumming up the works.

    --
    -
  74. Re:Injection molding by nuggz · · Score: 1

    I worked in injection molding development.
    It is injection molding, I will admit the words in the article are misleading.

    The clamp force doesn't squish the plastic, it is used to seal the mold so it doesn't leak plastic.

    In general for high volume thermoplastics production they use injection molding. LEGO definately injection molds their bricks.

  75. LEGO: Now without Requiring Imagination! by ClubStew · · Score: 1
    I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it too easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

    I couldn't agree more, and have been saying the same thing myself for years. They should make some subtitle - like some have "No Glue Required" - such as, "Now without Requiring Imagination".

    I just don't get all these toys today that say "let your kid use their imagination", when everything is displayed for them. Sure, learning games might help them learn but not really discover. There are some, but the vast majority seem to just spoon-feed everything to kids. That may yield more book smarts, but common sense will often get you farther in life.

  76. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

    Imagine that!

  77. In case it's not obvious by axlrosen · · Score: 1

    Those are miniature tires that lego makes, not real full-sized ones.

  78. the difference is at least one order of magnitude by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    Well, I should say that the difference is probably at least one order of magnitude. I think that is a large enough difference to be significant.

  79. Where do DUPLOS come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    that the process is so air tight that only 18 of 1 million pieces are considered defective.
    Finally I can tell my child the answer to "Where do DUPLOS come from?"
  80. one brick to rule them all by blake3737 · · Score: 1

    Isn't the plural of lego(s) "Legolas?"

  81. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I can pass that programming interview for that hip Web 2.0 company!

  82. Re:Typical Lego Post by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    I did, but someone who was probably mad at me for another reason modded me down.

    Despite that, I got a catalog the other day with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Except for the engines and nose cone, it's basically all just bricks. Might be hard to tell from the online image though. I was really impressed.

    Lego is also somewhat expensive, most kits hovering somewhere around the $0.10/piece mark, and even though the Dreamliner is licensed property, the cost per part is way under that, and it's probably because it doesn't use a lot of special pieces.

    For the record, though, I don't mind the special pieces at all. After all, using them in other creations can be just as creative. There's no point in longing for the days when you built a boat that didn't look like a boat and had every color in it when you can built a fairly nice creative boat now, unless you also pine for the days before microwave ovens and cell phones.

    My biggest problem with Lego is that my creations wouldn't use special pieces, but my visions of grandeur are far greater than the fatness of my wallet.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  83. Pot vs kettle by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Unless you have more than one login yourself ...

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    1. Re:Pot vs kettle by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      ha ha. true enough. I posted AC for a long time before I owned up to my geekiness. I could have had a 5 digit UID... oh well. I pick on my bro, because he prefers Digg. *gasp*

    2. Re:Pot vs kettle by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1
      Utterly OT:

      I visit digg for the links
      I visit Ars for the articles
      I visit /. for the comments.

      (And there are sites that I visit for the pictures. I cannot name them in a family forum, though.)

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    3. Re:Pot vs kettle by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      (And there are sites that I visit for the pictures. I cannot name them in a family forum, though.)

      So why, then, are you holding back from us?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  84. I'd compare, but ... by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    ... I don't think I've racked up sixty thousand miles on any of my lego tires.

  85. Re:Typical Lego Post by grm212 · · Score: 1

    Yep. That's my problem with the new Lego as well. All of the special parts are fun, but they do tend to direct kids a bit. The worst are the Lego people. They impose a scale on the model building and therefore limit the imagination to a certain degree. I try to encourage my kids to forget about the Lego people. They also have the benefit of a large collection from when I was a kid -- mostly basic blocks.

  86. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Was just intrigued. Wondering if he'd say or do anything interesting if prodded.

  87. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Do people still care about that? That's like sooooooooo 1990's.

  88. Why kids today HATE legos ... by systemBuilder · · Score: 1

    I saw that lego this year released a NEW set that allows you to build BUILDINGS !! I think the last time they did this was in 1962, when they release
    Lego Set #717, which is the set that I was given in 1966, when I was 4 years old.

    These days, kids hate legos because they spend most of the time looking for that custom piece that is lost in SOME OTHER LEGO SET of theirs. Or, because there are 17,298 different lego pieces, they spend most of the time searching a big pile of legos for piece #12821 to finish that model in the photograph...

    After finishing the model in the photograph, kids either fall asleep, exhausted, or head for the kitchen for 10 cookies and a huge glass of 4% fat chocolate milk ...

  89. One word by haggais · · Score: 1

    Hexasigmoidal (adj.)? Hexasigmism (n.)?

  90. Re:Typical Lego Post by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Today there aren't as many choices - I always liked the space ones and now everything has to be god awfull starwars crap.
    You said it. I bought my nephew a tie fighter set, and it was so dang complicated the *I* had trouble putting it together. This year I'm getting an old style space set off ebay for him. I've been waxing nostalgic for those old blue sets with the red and white spacemen ever since I found a brick labeled LL928 from the Galaxy Explorer set I got for xmas 1979...
    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  91. It will also prepare them... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    It will also prepare them for life as an adult. You know where you watch other people do things instead of doing them yourself. Like sports and cooking.

  92. customized parts by greywire · · Score: 1

    Even as a kid (late 70's), I would often wish for all manner of special parts that did not exist. At one point, being very much into airplanes, I wanted a part that was a curved hull peice. I actualy drew it up and sent it to lego hopeing that might produce it. Some years later they actualy did make some pieces for making airplaces, though they were not curved.

    But then, when I saw the original castle set compared to the new one, I was very upset. They went from lots of bricks to those giant premade wall peices that couldnt be used for anything else, and really just didnt look nearly as cool (it was a castle after all, it should be made from bricks!).

    Over the years lego has disapointed in many ways. But then they redeem themselves with things like the robotics sets (which got me back into lego after many years).

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  93. you knew it was comming. by Tikkun · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our plastic multifaceted toy overlords.

  94. There is a hilarous comment at the bottom by dcam · · Score: 1
    Anti-Metric Engineer
    For the benefit of the majority of people who would be reading an American magazine, ignore the metric system entirely.


    This person must either be an "engineer" or the standards for training engineers must be very low in the US. Maybe brain damage after receiving qualifications? No engineer with a modicum of sense would oppose the metric system for any reason other than difficulty of adoption.
    --
    meh
  95. I've said it before by geekoid · · Score: 1

    more cutsom piece gives kids more tool for the imagination, not less.
    Lego does not create an imagination, it is an utlet for imagination.
    sheesh.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  96. they could incfrease sales by 30% if they only by geekoid · · Score: 1

    did a Barbie tie in.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  97. Top this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so old that when I started playing with Legos in the early sixties, there were only two colors available- red and white. With grey platforms to build on. They didn't even have angled ones to make roofs with. No motors, no figurines, no wheels, no nothing. And we liked it!

    Goddam kids! Get off my lawn!

  98. Customized pieces are just designed to sell more.. by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    I knew I was getting old when I first realized that these kids today with their modern legos have it too easy, what with all those crazy custom pieces. Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

    Yeah-- Erector sets were like that too at one time. Check out what they're like now. You get a set, and it's designed to build one thing. It's more like a model kit than a building set. It's obvious why, that way you have to buy more stuff-- if you had a totally generic building set you'd never need anything else, and we can't have that, can we?

  99. Difficulty by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny
    Why, when I was a kid, we had to use our imagination to build stuff.

    Wow, that sounds difficult. Why didn't you use your hands?
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  100. It's tyre, not tire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they manafactured tires they'd need a lot of sleep.

  101. I cant believe nobody mentioned LEGO PORN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  102. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

    You, sir, are gay.

    See, now you're making it sound as if it were a bad thing.

    --
    We're all born with nothing.
    If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  103. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Queer dolt.

  104. Defect rate not impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's crap. We churn out very complicated silicon chips and the upper limit of acceptability is 50 DPPM (defects per million).

    We hit 18 DPPM or lower all the time!
    Lego's are just pieces of plastic, 18 DPPM is actually kind of sucky in that regard!

  105. Re:This is news? This matters how? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    It has EVERYTHING to do with science and technology... or at least people in the field. Most techs grew up around legos as their main toy practicaly every day for months at a time. It's part nastelgia, but Lego runs a REALLY tight ship... FEW companies can run 18 PPM manufacturing lines, get 100-200 and have QA pick out the bad ones or rework them... and we're not talking "out the door" which even auto makers can't achive... but "OFF THE MACHINE"!!! 18ppm on the first try is amazing for any industry. That makes it DOUBLY interesting!

  106. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most techs? You are an idiot.

  107. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Green peg.

  108. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat my balls.

  109. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd like that wouldn't you, big boy!

  110. Best Lego Pics - ha ha by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    These are the best pics of legos 'in action' I've ever seen:
    http://drew.corrupt.net/bp/series1.html

    Freakin hilarious - seriously, who has the time to set these up and take these pics?!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  111. Re:This is news? This matters how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, just to have them savored. Savor them.

  112. Re:This is news? This matters how? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I declare you the winner.

    Not quite sure what you;re the winner of. This was a battle of wits and I'm sure at least one opponent was unarmed.