Slashdot Mirror


People Swapping PS3s for Wiis?

An anonymous reader writes "To add to Sony's problems with the PS3 launch, it now appears that some Playstation 3 owners are trying to trade their PS3s for Wiis. The author writes: 'There's also speculation that people want the Wii because the PS3s best game is Resistance: Fall of Man. This, of course, forget that there are plenty of cool PS3 games on the way, and the PS3 has its own motion sensing technology, which, while not as good as the Wii, is still pretty cool and opens up Sony to emulate some of the Wii's successes.'"

328 comments

  1. I'd trade in too by schnits0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd trade in too if my Wii looked like this.

    1. Re:I'd trade in too by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Who cares about a Wii or Xbox360 or PS3 but after I think you will need a PS3 just to relax with, so you can build up your strength for another round of bedroom sport.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    2. Re:I'd trade in too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, she looks kinda skankii.

      (Oddly enough, the image verification word for this post is "diseases")

    3. Re:I'd trade in too by megaditto · · Score: 0, Troll

      If I were you, I'd go for the portly girl on the left.

      Not only is she probably more intelligent and well-rounded, she won't bitch and cheat on you. And your family bliss is a McDonnalds away!

      (sorry sorry)

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    4. Re:I'd trade in too by aliquis · · Score: 1

      To me it's the opposit, I'd trade if my PS3 looked like that ;)

      (Or well, rather, I wouldn't have got the PS3 in the first place.)

    5. Re:I'd trade in too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Oh my god.

      I can barely breath.

      That's so funny.

      And I want a wii!

      First console, I *ever* wanted. I even went out and braved several stores before I gave up and decided I'll get one in January.

      Typical scenario.
      me: do you have any wii's?
      them: No
      them2: No, would you like to buy a PS3?
      them3: No, we got in 25 this morning and they sold to the people who happened to be in the area when we unpacked them in 15 minutes, would you like to buy a PS3?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:I'd trade in too by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      The "hot" chick is a butter face. However, the geek that thought this up gets a bonus multiplier for actually getting 2 girls in the same room.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    7. Re:I'd trade in too by dawnzer · · Score: 1

      My fiance had the great idea to get his niece a wii for Christmas because they have both been waiting for that Zelda game so long. There was no way we were going to stand in line for one (it isn't even our kid), so he called all the stores on a regular basis to see if they got any in.

      Last week he called Walmart and they said they had 6 PS3s - but the wiis they got in 3 hours ago were already gone. Neededless to say we ended up giving his niece a giftcard to Target to purchase the console after the rush dies down.

      --
      "Oh, say, can you see by the dawnzer lee light," sang Miss Binney
    8. Re:I'd trade in too by beckerist · · Score: 2, Funny

      So how would you have sex with something like that???


      Roll her in flour and look for the wet spot!

    9. Re:I'd trade in too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hot chick will dump you in a heartbeat.


      The fat chick dumps you, who cares.


      Beshides the fat chick's probably an engineer, the hot chick probably wants to be a veterenarian because she loves children.M/p>

    10. Re:I'd trade in too by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Now imagine this Real life image: a 11 year old in his underwear and a dirty white t-shirt screaming "I want to play NIN-TIN-DOOOO!" until he's so hoarse he sounds like Patty Bouvier from the Simpsons.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    11. Re:I'd trade in too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      butter face? *ding* *ding* *ding* *ding* we got ourselves an internet male here.

    12. Re:I'd trade in too by drsquare · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually morbidly obese people generally have huge mental problems. And living off junk food isn't particularly condusive to intelligence. They're also really bitchy.

    13. Re:I'd trade in too by Lotharus · · Score: 1

      Two girls standing in an otherwise essentially perfectly white area. Their paths don't even intersect, except for the hot chick throwing whatever that thing was. I see no reason to believe they were ever in the same room at the same time.

    14. Re:I'd trade in too by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1
      For Christmas my wife and I told our friends and family to just get us gift cards, as what we really want is a Wii. Got plenty of gift cards, just can't get a hold of a Wii. The nearest BestBuy, from which all of our cards came, sold out in under an half an hour on the second shipment, I managed to get there about 45 minutes after the store opened, due to having the wrong opening time, and so missed out until next year.
      My parents, on the other hand (both in their 60's), managed to get a Wii held for them at CircuitCity by buying a big screen TV and a DirectTV subscription. Actually, they were buying those anyway, and asked about a Wii, and the salesman offered to hold one; I guess a good commission is a good way to get a salesman to go the extra mile. Now, if I want to play with a Wii I have to go back to my parents home. Yes, they were buying it for themselves, neither are really gamers but when my brother brought his over for Thanksgiving all of us got hooked on WiiSports Golf and Bowling. My father will probably be getting Tiger Woods golf for his birthday. Nintendo really has a hit system on their hands, all they have to do is make and let others make a lot of good games for it and they might just bury Sony this time around.
      As it is Sony has once again proved it's proficency for sighting and and shooting the hell out of it's own foot.
      1. Betamax - Bang!
      2. MiniDisc - Bang!
      3. UMD - Bang!
      4. PS3 - Got it in my sights, sir!
      The only thing they have going for them at the moment is that several movie studios are actually selling BluRay versions of movies. Problem is they are usually stacked up against the DVD version, leading people to ask, "why would I want to buy the Betamax^W BluRay version when I already have a VHS^W DVD player?" Once again, I think Sony has got their own foot just about lined up.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    15. Re:I'd trade in too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that the girl on the left is "morbidly obese", then you are the one with a "huge mental problem".

  2. Wii woe by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

    Great, now even more people are taking my Wiis. I'm thinking about waiting until March with the discount + colors now since it's not that far away anymore. That is... if I even get one at all.

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
    1. Re:Wii woe by shaka999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know of at least 4 people who would have bought Wii's had they been able to. One of them gave up and got a 360 and the others are so discouraged they probably won't get one at all. Even though Nintendo's launch is being billed as one of the best (if not the best) launch ever I think they really screwed up. They should have picked a country, hyped the machine, and then had enough consoles to let everyone who wanted one get one.

      The way it is the excitement is pretty much died down. Many people who would have made the quick impulse won't. Bad move...

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    2. Re:Wii woe by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >They should have picked a country, hyped the machine, and then had enough consoles to let everyone who wanted one get one.

      can work both ways. I live in UK: no PS3 till March. if I had wanted one I would have seen it as them telling me to fuck off and told them the same.

      Nintendo launching everywhere as much as possible shows respect to their customers imo. I was able to get a Wii, and so was everyone else who knew about the launch beforehand and was prepared to put a little work in (refreshing amazon.co.uk for 40mins).

      expecting to get a Wii straight away when only deciding to get one *after* it has had a massive launch and become a hit is just childish. but telling your customers they can't even think about having one for 4 months is just insulting.

      (to all UK PS3-wanters: you only get treated this way because you put up with it.)

    3. Re:Wii woe by MayorDefacto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought I'd be waiting until at least spring as well, but I just happened to be in my local big-box store two days before Christmas, and they just happened to be stocking the shelves with 5 Wiis as I watched. Apparently they were sitting in the stockroom unnoticed; I grabbed one immediately, as did two other people standing there with me. As I was walking out of the store, a couple of people saw what I had in hand and started *running* towards the electronics department.
      Sometimes you just find yourself in the right place at the right time. Christmas miracles really do happen!

    4. Re:Wii woe by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      expecting to get a Wii straight away when only deciding to get one *after* it has had a massive launch and become a hit is just childish.

      My fiance keeps looking at her coworkers in shock when they whine about the fact that she has a Wii and none of them do. If they'd done like me and spent an hour out in the cold one morning back in October to reserve one, they'd have one, too. But instead they'd rather sit around and cry about how it's not fair that we got one and they didn't. They're acting like Nintendo just decided to release a console in the middle of November and only the chosen few were enlightened with the knowledge it was coming. ...

      Woah, I just noticed you've got me foe'd, that's interesting... Wonder how I earned that...

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    5. Re:Wii woe by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 0

      >Woah, I just noticed you've got me foe'd, that's interesting... Wonder how I earned that...

      dunno, all your comments in history are about Wii, but based on "Staunch conservative thinker and capitalist pig. :)", maybe you said something pro-ID or anti-choice.

      or maybe you just used the phrase "could care less" or spelled ridiculous wrong. it's BS anyway since I don't use foe modifiers...

    6. Re:Wii woe by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I'd have bought a Wii if I'd been able to. Had one on order, even.

      Now I'll wait until the strongly rumored January price drop and their appearance in stores.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:Wii woe by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      I'll wait until the strongly rumored January price drop and their appearance in stores.

      Strongly rumored price drop for the Wii for January 2007? Though I highly doubt it, do you have any sources? This is the first I've heard of it.

    8. Re:Wii woe by metamatic · · Score: 1
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    9. Re:Wii woe by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Although New colors and a price drop are going to happen (and perhaps before Holiday 2007), I would hope for a more reliable source. Thanks for the link though. Personally I would like new colors starting with the remotes, it just makes them more personal.

    10. Re:Wii woe by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that Spring 2007 != January 2007. Spring begins in about March and extends through about May. A May price drop might be more realistic than a January one.

      --
      The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
    11. Re:Wii woe by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      A price drop? When the things are selling as fast as they can be taken out of the shipping box, selling them for less money is not a likely prospect.

      You can't sell faster than instantly sold out. There's not even much value in undercutting the competition further, because you won't switch anybody off the other consoles because...there's no Wiis to switch off onto, they're all already sold.

      A price drop is likely, but probably not until at least until everyone who's already set on getting a Wii has one. It'd be silly to lower the price while people are still camped out at 3am for them and buying them all away as soon as the store opens.

    12. Re:Wii woe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only way I see a price drop happening before fall of 07 is if the 360 premium drops to $299 and the core drops to $199. That might put enough pressure on Nintendo to cut the price down to $199. But really, the 360 and Wii aren't competing so much. It's more of a case of people wanting both systems it seems. Interest in the PS3 is still decent, but not with the current price point. Many stores (as indicated in the article) are having PS3s sit unsold for many hours or even days after arrival. A few months after launch this would not be a story, but only one month after launch, and a brand new console isn't flying off the shelves anymore? Sony has got to be worried. Nintendo is making obscene amounts of money right now, not so much with the Wii (not that many units), but with the DS Lite. These things are sold out everywhere, because despite Nintendo's promise to retailers that there would be more than enough units for the quarter, they failed to anticipate just how crazy the demand was going to be for the unit.

    13. Re:Wii woe by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      dunno, all your comments in history are about Wii,

      It's been a busy week.

      but based on "Staunch conservative thinker and capitalist pig. :)",

      I really should change that. Conservative hasn't described me since my second year in college... But then again I hate being associated with the Libertarian Party...

      maybe you said something pro-ID

      Hybel vs Nevada = cry

      or anti-choice.

      Hmm define anti-choice?

      or maybe you just used the phrase "could care less"

      That I've been guilty of.

      it's BS anyway since I don't use foe modifiers...

      Heh, I'm not worrying about it. If everyone "liked" me I'd be paranoid. Just normally when I earn a foe I've at least done something to be proud of, so I was curious, that's all...

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    14. Re:Wii woe by finalbroadcast · · Score: 1

      Yeah Spring seems likely as that is when the Wii is supposed to be in steady supply.

  3. To be fair by Shados · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be fair, it does happen the other way around plenty, and with 360s, too. I've seen a lot of people return their Wiis when they learnt that online play wouldn't be Nintendo's main focus.

    Not enough people, unfortunately, since I got Zelda for christmas, and I have no Wii to play it on >. I had several chances at a PS3, but not at a Wii, grrrrrrr...

    1. Re:To be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "To be fair, it does happen the other way around plenty, and with 360s, too. I've seen a lot of people return their Wiis when they learnt that online play wouldn't be Nintendo's main focus.

      Not enough people, unfortunately, since I got Zelda for christmas, and I have no Wii to play it on >. I had several chances at a PS3, but not at a Wii, grrrrrrr..."

      Why was this modded as troll? Am I missing something?

    2. Re:To be fair by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably because of the online comment. Of course people are stupid so this is still likely to happen but Nintendo did say they won't have online play ready until sometime in 2007. The original XBox didn't have online play from day one, either.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:To be fair by necro2607 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only did I get Zelda Twilight Princess, I also got Red Steel and an extra Wii remote and nunchuck... STILL don't have the Wii, though... Wheee!!!

    4. Re:To be fair by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Trust me, Red Steel is much more fun when it's never put in the Wii.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    5. Re:To be fair by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      If people inadvertently get information wrong, I might have corrected them in a response. Marking it as a Troll isn't t really fair to an otherwise earnest post.

      Even so, as far as the wrongness is concerned, I'm not so sure it's incorrect to say Nintendo is less focused on online play. Sony and Microsoft have both said this is a major thing for their new consoles, while Nintendo has advertised the Wii as more of a family and party console.

      I don't think one necessarily precludes the other, but like a lot of things with console gaming, image counts for a lot as far as the direction of the box is concerned. If people don't see the Wii as a big online gaming machine, then those features are less likely to be emphasized in future games.

      TW

    6. Re:To be fair by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think you may be able to get them to send you a free Wii system. Get an old television that doesn't work anymore. Then kick the screen in. Then tell Nintendo you had a defective adapter that caused your game system to separate from your outlet and fly into the television. It just might work.

      By the way, make sure you don't get shocked by the picture tube when you kick it in.

    7. Re:To be fair by friedmud · · Score: 1

      This is a reply to nullify my incorrect "Off Topic" mod... I just accidentally clicked it....

      But to bring _this_ post back on-topic... I'll say that I finally decided that I wanted one bad enough to sleep out overnight for it. So when I heard that the morning of December 17th was going to be _the_ day that everyone got their shipments, I camped out from about 10PM until 8AM for my Wii. It was totally worth it.

      Sorry to hear about the Zelda with no Wii... it is a great game... definitely worth waiting for.

      Friedmud

    8. Re:To be fair by Jarn_Firebrand · · Score: 1

      I have Red Steel, Zelda TP, Call of Duty 3, and a classic controller... and no Wii to play on.

    9. Re:To be fair by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. Anything contrary posted about said subject will get modded down without thinking.

      That being said I paid a $50 premium on eBay for my Wii and Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Money well spent. We (not Wii) have had a huge blast over the christmas holiday at my parents home with the Wii.

      My 60 year old parents got up at 8:00AM Christmas Eve morning and almost missed church because they were playing bowling over and over.

      My 7, 6, 5, and 4 year old nephews went hog wild in tennis. It was a sight to watch.

      My siblings and their significant others played bowling and tennis more than I've ever seen them do on the Gamecube, PS2, or PS1. I've not seen that much activity since we were a lot younger and only then it was me and my brother playing, not my two sisters.

      I have high hopes for the success of the Wii in non-traditional gaming markets because of that. Sure, hard core gamers will probably downplay it and like the 1080p or whatever the Xbox 360 or PS3 can do, but right now my money is on the Wii as a wake up for the industry.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    10. Re:To be fair by Gen.+Rasputin+X · · Score: 1

      Necro man, just come over to my place and play on mine. I've only got a single wiimote, and a few games I've rented from blockbuster, but so far it's been a blast. We've done 3 or 4 wii parties where we've taken turns playing wiisports and excite truck.

    11. Re:To be fair by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Not enough people, unfortunately, since I got Zelda for christmas, and I have no Wii to play it on >."

      Same here. Good thing I got the GameCube version, sucka!

  4. I think my GFs parents were going to give us a PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but that didn't happen...

    An interesting story for my fellow dotters on a Christmas night...potentially offtopic, but probably not...

    So I'm over my girlfriend's parents' house this evening for Christmas dinner. First Christmas for the both of us together, though I've been to the parents' house several times before, a nice yet cozy 3/1.5 built in the 1950s. We were getting ready to sit down for dinner, with the presents to be exchanged after dessert.

    So we're in the living room making the normal chit-chat about work and family and presents, yada yada yada. And then it hits me. That "you know what it means when it happens" cramp in your colon. And then a bubble or two. I'm percolating. A cold sweat comes over me. And then your intestines tell your brain in no uncertain terms: things will be exiting soon, at a very rapid pace.

    So I excuse myself from the conversation, sweat already forming on my brow, and I make my way to the back bedroom to purge this unrelenting force from my bowels. But oh my God...my GF's father is in the back bathroom. The only other bathroom is a small bath located directly off of the living room itself. Oh no, that would never do. But alas, the percolation continues and my colon is screaming for purging. This will wait no longer.

    So I return to the living room, no time for chit chat, though everyone there can sense that something is not quite right by the sweat pouring down my forehead and the singular purpose on my face. I plow my way into the guest bathroom and barely have time to sit on the toilet before the full force of a major colon blow bellows forth from my rectum. The sound virtually echoes in the small half bath and then the purging continues unabated, half diarrhea half flatulence over and over, shit splashing up on my backside. This process continues for a good 5 minutes before the wave is over. And now I sit there, brown liquid dripping off my anus, dripping off the sides and lid of the toilet.

    And I ponder how I will exit the bathroom.

    Do I pretend nothing happened. Do I play the sympathy angle? Play the "I'm sick sweetheart" angle? I decide to just play it off and pretend nothing happened. Perhaps they hadn't heard anything. Maybe it was all in my mind how noisy and guttural the sounds were.

    So I flush, do my best to tidy up the bowl with the tiny little toilet brush they had next to the toilet. Wash, and exit.

    And I exit to the horrified wide-eyed look of everyone in the living room. Yes, Virginia, it was really that loud apparently. GF's mom asks me if I'm ok. I play it off like, why yes, I'm fine, why? And then it hits. Like a brown fog descending on the valley, the odor from the bathroom washes over us like a wave from hell. I had turned the entire living room into a dutch oven. Oh my god.

    So I did the only thing I could come up with quickly and motioned to the GF that we had to leave. And we made our quick apologies and made our way to the exit, while her mom noticeably gagged on the stench that had blown out of my asshole. And on our way out -- which the GF's mom by the way didn't object to at all (she was likely in a state of shock over what she had witnessed) -- the GF's dad comes out from the back bedroom and the stench hits him like a baseball bat to the face. The expression on his face was priceless, you'd think he had just walked into a room filled with mustard gas.

    At that point, we quickly departed leaving behind a half dozen victims of my gastric evacuation. Merry fucking Christmas, LOL.

    At first the GF was mad, but after we started laughing about it (and about a few of the "victims" whom we both can't stand) all was forgiven. I can't imagine eating Christmas dinner in that house, with it wreaking of shit and bowel blowback.

  5. Good Lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a lame story.

  6. Other way around by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll gladly trade my lightly used Wii for a new or lightly used PS3. Any takers?

  7. Obligatory by Anubis_Ascended · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. Trade in PS3 for a Wii (and maybe a few Wiimotes/games)

    2. ???

    3. PROFIT!

  8. Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    on video games. She and her family won't buy a new console for at least the first six months that it's out because they want to see what actually comes out for it, what others think, how many bugs it has, etc. I'm not surprised in the least now because the PS3 is very expensive, said to be rushed in a number of areas, and well, wasn't quite worth the hype.

    As a former Dreamcast fan, I'm not surprised. Sony's hype engine is a double-edged sword. On the one hand it can really crush a poorly marketed, but good console. On the other, it set a bar that was ridiculous for their engineers to try to achieve.

    People are starting to wise up to Sony and realize that they are great at hyping stuff that ends up being no better than their competition's products that happen to be significantly cheaper. They probably haven't even figured out why it is that Apple has kicked them squarely in the nuts in the digital music player market. I think their worst nightmare would be a dynamic duo of Apple and Nintendo building the One True Living Room Suite.

    There are so many good games for XBox/XBox 360 and Playstation 2 that only hardcore gamers need to really go out and buy a PS3. I'm going back now and buying all of the games I missed when I was busy graduating from college last year and... there's no reason for a guy like me to buy a PS3 for at least a year and a half.

    1. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by powerlord · · Score: 5, Informative
      there's no reason for a guy like me to buy a PS3 for at least a year and a half.


      At which point they should have the supply problems nixed, and there should be quite a number of games that you might be looking forward to playing on it.

      Kinda reminds me of when the PS2 launched.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Seems like a good philosophy. I applied the same policy and waited before making a decision on the PSP, and I'm glad I did. Everyone I know who bought one right away is now letting it collect dust, apparently because there just aren't any great games coming out for it.

    3. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by HappySqurriel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be honest, the reason I believe that Nintendo has been so successful (so far) with the Wii is that they recognized a need in the market and they built a system to fill that need. Essentially, Nintendo thought that there was a need for an inexpensive, easy to develop for, arcade-like system that could provide a new game play experience; and that is what they delivered.

      Not to be too negative about the PS3, but the PS3 is designed to be "Exactly like every other system in history ... only better" whereas the Wii is designed to be "Something different". In my opinion the Wii is successful because of how unique it is.

    4. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by wizrd_nml · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been watching the console discussion taking place for the last couple of weeks and it's pretty clear that PS3 bashing has become the norm. Personally, I don't think I will ever buy a PS3, simply because I care more about fun games rather than good graphics.

      But I don't think we should be too quick to judge the PS3 as "no better than their competition". The way it's configured, the PS3 has the potential to be better than the competition. I think it's just a matter of time before game developers get used to developing for it. A few quick thoughts:

      - The sixaxis was overshadowed by the Wii's revolutionary controller, but it's still a very cool feature and makes the XBox 360's controller look disabled by comparison

      - The potential of the cell processor architecture is significant. Once developers figure out how to make optimal use of it it could potentially take games to a new level (think realistic physics, better AI, a better online experience, etc..). Here, potential is the key word as it really depends on how well Sony helps game developers make use of its hardware.

      - Blu-ray is a gamble, for sure. I think Sony pushed the format too soon. But if the gamble pays off and it does become the new standard, suddenly everyone's gonna wish they got a PS3 and those who don't have one will get one. In any case, Blu-ray allows game developers to put more content on the PS3 version of their games. This initially might just be bonus features (such as the-making-of videos) but eventually will translate into more gameplay content (extra levels perhaps?)

      My 2 cents'.

    5. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Cerebus · · Score: 1

      The potential of the cell processor architecture is significant. Once developers figure out how to make optimal use of it it could potentially take games to a new level (think realistic physics, better AI, a better online experience, etc..).

      Concomitant with that we should also think "longer development cycles and more expensive games." I think these will go hand in hand with developers trying to push the envelope on the Cell.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    6. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Medgur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no such thing as a former Dreamcast fan. There are only Dreamcast fans who lament its early commercial demise.

    7. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by aliquis · · Score: 1

      So did you got nothing at all or the DS? If you like:
      * Old school 2D scrollers (New super mario bros, Yoshis island ds, 2 castlevania titles, megaman zx, princess peach, star-fi, ..)
      * Puzzle games (Kirby, yoshi touch&go, maybe even zookeeper and meteos thought I don't like them that much.)
      * RPGs (One final fantasy released, two in the works, Children of mana, Zelda)
      Also various platform games and so on, I doubt it will disappoint you.

      The DS is probably NOT the perfect console for people who want to play car games, games which requires analogue input to be good and various fighting games. Also it's not the best choice for people who want flashy 3D graphics with massive lighting effects instead of "hand made pixel bitmaps" ;)

    8. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Twiceblessedman · · Score: 1

      You lost me at so many good games for the xbox and 360. Loads and loads of first person shooters aren't good games. Maybe for teenagers who think they are "mature" because their game has an M on it and tells them so. This is probably why the 360's sales numbers fail to surpass the original xbox's in the same time span. :(

    9. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by 2ms · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was so funny I remember people talking about how the PS2 was going to be a supercomputer not allowed into certain countries because it was so powerful it could give them nukes and how its emotion engine was going to make gaming almost indistinguishable from the real world. It was the biggest sham in the world. There were several games that actually looked better on Dreamcast than they did on the PS2.

      This is actually the strategy that MS has used whenever Macs start getting a lot of attention. MS always says they have an OS with everything that Mac has Plus a whole bunch of new things that are going to revolutionize everything. And then the OS comes out five years late with, not only nothing revolutionary, but not even having the things Mac had 5 years earlier (two most salient examples: Win95 was supposed to be all new OS but at last second was switched to DOS at heart, Vista was supposed to have all these new techs yet now, years late, it's just terribly resource intensive XP with copy of Mac Aqua GUI).

      I think this is Sony's strategy. They come up with these catchy names to go along with console like Emotion Engine or Cell (which really just another IBM chip only with more spikes and valleys in its capabilities -- not net positive) and trumpet them like nothing has ever been trumpeted before in front of would-be other console buyers for two years ahead of actual release just so that people will figure they better wait until the PS comes out because it is going to be teh omg SO revolutionary. Which it never is. Rant over. It just funny. It's sort of a total business model.

    10. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To expand on this, I've tried putting a PS2 dual-shock into the hands of new players, like my girlfriend and my mother. "What's this?" they inevitably ask. It's an intimidatingly big mass of buttons, switches, diodes, etc. Add a "Wii-like" tilt sensor, and you just make something even LESS accessible.

      Compare that to the Wii. It's a remote control that points. Everyone can play wii bowling. Everyone can navigate the metagame without wondering if they should use the d-pad or the left or right analog sticks. It's intuitive. You don't have to think as much about it. You can just get on with the business of playing games.

      In addition to inexpensive, easy to develop for, unique, and short-time period experiences, the Wii also provides the instant accessibility that is sorely lacking in today's systems. Learning to play Rockstar's Table Tennis on the 360 takes about 1/2 hour. Learning to play Tennis on the Wii takes about 10 seconds. That's a huge difference if you're just trying to relax for a moment between sending the kids off to school and leaving for work yourself.

    11. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by smash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Concomitant with that we should also think "longer development cycles and more expensive games." I think these will go hand in hand with developers trying to push the envelope on the Cell.

      Maybe, maybe not.

      If sony release (or a dev creates, in their first/second gen titles) a bunch of libraries and/or an optimising compiler to simplify development for it, perhaps it will be "easier" to develop for because there could be less need to optimise the game to "fit" within the hardware's abilities.

      The PC platform is an awkward piece of shit (segmented memory, no standard video/audio hardware platform, etc) to program for compared to many of the platforms it displaced (eg, Amiga, Macintosh, ST, etc), but it had the raw power to make it "worth it".

      Also, the dreamcast was supposedly easier to develop for than the PS2, due to it's (optional, perhaps? I know sega rally 2 uses it) use of WinCE, and look what happened there.

      Sure, the saturn died, and it was awkward to program, but it also had other problems, like buggy hardware features (transparency from memory, for example) that contributed as well.

      Yes, the PS3 will require developers to learn new tricks, but once they've got a couple of games/engines under their belt, and most of the "tough problems" are "solved" in their code library, they'll have a far more powerful machine to play with...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    12. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Well put.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    13. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      The potential of the cell processor architecture is significant. Once developers figure out how to make optimal use of it it could potentially take games to a new level (think realistic physics, better AI, a better online experience, etc..)

      How will the Cell processor help with AI? AI works better on a general-purpose processor. The 360 has the advantage here, with three general purpose cores, each with two hardware threads. The Cell has one general purpose core, with two threads.

    14. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is by the time you're ready to buy a PS3, there'll be a PS4 released shortly so all of the companies will stop making PS3 games.

    15. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1, Redundant

      In any case, Blu-ray allows game developers to put more content on the PS3 version of their games. This initially might just be bonus features (such as the-making-of videos) but eventually will translate into more gameplay content (extra levels perhaps?)

      Bonus features like that already exist on modern DVD-based games, but most games out there still aren't filling up a single-layer DVD, let alone a dual-layer or a Blu-ray disk. Extra disk space is a total non-event.

    16. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by cgenman · · Score: 1

      The sixaxis was overshadowed by the Wii's revolutionary controller, but it's still a very cool feature and makes the XBox 360's controller look disabled by comparison

      No offence, but have you used the sixaxis? The actual tilt mechanism is quite, quite laggy. And unfortunately in any control interface a little bit of lag will lead to a lot of player overcompensation oscillation cycles. It's basically unusable in the current crop of games, though the potential exists that they could improve their bluetooth drivers and get the lag under control. Ultimately, though, it really doesn't make the 360's controller look disabled, especially with the 360's unique guide button, headset jack, and vibration.

      Also, the sixaxis's shoulder buttons, an attempt to immitate the smoother analog functionality of the original Xbox and Game Cube, are actually quite broken. They both curve away from the hand quite significantly, and rotate away as you press them. In other words, they're difficult to hold without slipping off, a major oversight that should have been corrected after the first or second focus test.

      The potential of the cell processor architecture is significant. Once developers figure out how to make optimal use of it it could potentially take games to a new level (think realistic physics, better AI, a better online experience, etc..). Here, potential is the key word as it really depends on how well Sony helps game developers make use of its hardware.

      Actually, you don't need better AI. You have all of the clock cycles you need on the PS2 to make dumb AI. And dumb AI is a lot more fun to play against than crafty, intelligent AI. You want enemies that run straight at you while being mowed down, rather than ones that sneak up behind you and club you with a ratchet while you aren't looking. The 360 has more than enough power for that.

      Realistic physics is a double edged sword as well. You want physics that look realistic, but you don't want actual real physics. You don't want the player to be killed if they bump into a vending machine which falls onto them. Jumping 2 feet into the air is boring. The ability to scatter a room full of stuff with a grenade is a neat visual effect, but the 360 can already do that.

      You also don't need better CPU's for better online experiences. What you need is a fatter pipe and lower ping times, along with a more flexible underlying server infrastructure for handling online transactions, matchmaking, etc. Those are the limitations, and unfortunately none have to do with system power. In this area, Microsoft actually has the clear advantage, as their online service simply rocks, and allows for amazingly smooth transitions to online play for developers. Sony, whose online strategy has been "eh, we'll let developers write it," has a lot of catching up to in terms of supportive infrastructure.

      Blu-ray is a gamble, for sure. I think Sony pushed the format too soon. But if the gamble pays off and it does become the new standard, suddenly everyone's gonna wish they got a PS3 and those who don't have one will get one. In any case, Blu-ray allows game developers to put more content on the PS3 version of their games. This initially might just be bonus features (such as the-making-of videos) but eventually will translate into more gameplay content (extra levels perhaps?)

      More likely you'll see more geometry and textures in existing levels. Blu-Ray really is the one major feature that could separate the PS3 from the 360, as DVD content storage levels are precipitously tight. Nearly every game these days is slammed up against the 4 GB wall. I doubt you'll see developers creating more levels specifically for the PS3 (we're a lazy bunch), but better texturing and more level content is a definite possibility. Programmatically generated content, like time-specific shadow maps, are also a possibility. I'd expect content creators to create their full games on the PS3, then cut back some of the more storage-intensive features

    17. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by trawg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Compare that to the Wii. It's a remote control that points. Everyone can play wii bowling. Everyone can navigate the metagame without wondering if they should use the d-pad or the left or right analog sticks. It's intuitive. You don't have to think as much about it. You can just get on with the business of playing games.
      I can't agree more. I just came back from Christmas day with the family where after seeing me, my brother and my sister playing Wii, everyone from my 4 year old cousin to my 80 year old grandfather wanted a go. They were able to pick it up and Just Play It.

      I can't wait to see what happens in the next year or so with games once developers build on the stuff that it can offer.
    18. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by booooh · · Score: 1

      there's no reason for a guy like me to buy a PS3 for at least a year and a half. Yeah, you have a girlfriend.
    19. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by yulek · · Score: 1

      I like this point a lot. Because if you think about it, the Wii already has much of the same appeal that made the iPod so damn pervasive. And no, I don't mean it being white... But you have to admit the comparisons are many fold. The iPod was not technologically the most advanced mp3 player. The iPod was designed to be super user friendly. The iPod was released with (relative to the times) superb software support.

      --
      in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    20. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also, the dreamcast was supposedly easier to develop for than the PS2, due to it's (optional, perhaps? I know sega rally 2 uses it) use of WinCE, and look what happened there.
      WinCE was optional. It was not even built-in. Very few games used it, mostly simple-looking ones and PC ports (Armada, Sega Swirl, Railroad Tycoon), because it didn't perform as well as using Sega's own stuff. Sega Rally 2 was a bit of a miracle, and even then it had some framerate issues. But even without that, the Dreamcast was regarded as much easier to code for than the PS2.
    21. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      In any case, Blu-ray allows game developers to put more content on the PS3 version of their games. This initially might just be bonus features (such as the-making-of videos) but eventually will translate into more gameplay content (extra levels perhaps?)

      Hah!

      Blu-Ray will get us one thing and one thing only:

      "Xenosaga Syndrome" will become terminal.

    22. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by DrXym · · Score: 1
      on video games. She and her family won't buy a new console for at least the first six months that it's out because they want to see what actually comes out for it, what others think, how many bugs it has, etc. I'm not surprised in the least now because the PS3 is very expensive, said to be rushed in a number of areas, and well, wasn't quite worth the hype.

      Which is smart advice. It is UTTERLY POINTLESS to buy a new console for 6 months because there nothing to play on it. That goes for the 360, PS3 or Wii. Having said that, I see nothing about the PS3 which makes it seemed rushed. The PS3 launch has been relatively uneventful especially when compared to the heat problems with the 360 or busted straps and broken TVs of the Wii. Still, with no real choice until at least the European launch, it seems bizarre that anyonewould hysterically fork out $4000 on eBay to get one. Lots of idiots out there.

      There are so many good games for XBox/XBox 360 and Playstation 2 that only hardcore gamers need to really go out and buy a PS3. I'm going back now and buying all of the games I missed when I was busy graduating from college last year and... there's no reason for a guy like me to buy a PS3 for at least a year and a half.

      The same goes for the Wii. Really, what of its launch games justify forking out for it? The Gamecube version of Zelda is virtually identical to the Wii version. Perhaps that's why Nintendo engaged in a spot of product sabotage. Other than that, it's a mixed bunch of mostly meh titles. If you already own the GC there is zero reason apart from hype to pick up a Wii for christmas.

      Having said that, both the GC and XBox are dying or on their last legs, and the PS2 seems the only moderately healthy last-gen console. Give it 12 months and that will be probably on the way out too.

    23. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Stormwatch · · Score: 1
      To expand on this, I've tried putting a PS2 dual-shock into the hands of new players, like my girlfriend and my mother. "What's this?" they inevitably ask. It's an intimidatingly big mass of buttons, switches, diodes, etc. Add a "Wii-like" tilt sensor, and you just make something even LESS accessible.
      Hey, I'm no n00b to gaming, and that damned controller freaks me out too! But it's not simply about the number of buttons. I'll list the issues:

      Four triggers
      The main problem. You have to either use your middle and index fingers (which takes a lot of coordination, and makes your grip on the controller weaker), or use only your index finger (which forces you to move them it in an unnatural way). The Saturn's controller also had eight buttons -- but it was six face buttons and two triggers, which was just fine.

      Button names
      Cross, triangle, ball, square? Fuck! Talk about counter-intuitive. It takes time to memorize where each button is. It'd be easier if it used letters like every other controller out there.

      Bad shape
      It just does not feel comfortable to hold. It's very poorly shaped, it makes you twist your wrists. The analog sticks are also poorly placed. I'll take a Dreamcast controller over that piece of shit any time!

      Broken d-pad
      They "broke" the d-pad into four buttons, and broken it is indeed! It's hard to press a diagonal.
    24. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      You sound just like Sony's PR...

      What we are discussing here is if we really need better physics and graphics (the cell won't make a better online experience). Better AI is probably a good thing, but the cell won't also help it that much.

      Also, the cell is HARD to program for. VERY HARD. A good programer can make efficient code for it, but any miss can destroy the performance of the hole program. It would be very nice to have optimizing compilers for the platform, and to get libraries that solve the hard parts, but making it easy to write programs for that kind of computer is an open problem of CS for decades (and a kind of holy graal of CS), and I wouldn't hold my breath waitting for Sony to solve it on time to catch the console market.

    25. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by KingNaught · · Score: 1

      And whats wrong with being like ever other game system. Game systems have evolved to the point their at for a reason. Should we all just spontansioullly evolve a third arm with seven fingers on it just becuase its new and might be useful in some situtations. Its taken game system developers years to find the perfect balance. The controller (Which is the only unique thing about the wii) has evolved over the years to meet the needs of the widest area of game types, and I think the current format used by Microsoft & Sony while not perfect is a lot better general use controller. Ninentdos contoller is fun for certain types of games speciifically designed for it, but I think its going to end up being an annoance for most games in the long run.

    26. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by blighter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What's wrong with being a dinosaur? Dinosaurs evolved into the point they're at for a reason.

      Should the earth spontaneously start over with small, rat-like warm-blooded mammals?

      Sure the mammals are smaller, more agile, and better able to survive clamatous events, but that's the only thing unique about them. The dinosaurs enormous size and incredible power have evolved over the years to meet the needs of the widest area of terrain types and I think their current form is, while maybe not perfect, a lot better for most uses than a little rat body.

      Sure these mammals are good at the little niches they've managed to find but I think it's going to be dinosaurs for a long time to come...

    27. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by blighter · · Score: 1

      The sixaxis was overshadowed by the Wii's revolutionary controller, but it's still a very cool feature and makes the XBox 360's controller look disabled by comparison

      But doesn't the 360 controller's vibrate function make the sixaxis controller look disabled by comparison?

    28. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by KingNaught · · Score: 1

      If your going to use that example Dinosaurs existed for millions of years, where's the astroid hitting the game industry that requires such a huge shift in controller technology. What I'm saying is change for changes sake ussually ends in failure. Nintendo is like the goth kid that wears black becuase he wants to be diffent than everyone else and to stand out, but ends up just looking like a dork with black nail polish on.

    29. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by zoward · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. I still get a lot of use out of that little white toploading box, both as a game machine. It's a great toy for modders and emulation fans.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    30. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      It never really crossed my mind, but from the way you've written it, it sure sounds like Nintendo took some pages out of Apple and their approach to the ipod.

      I wonder what makes the system sell so well is the 'gimmicky' interface, or the price. Now that I think of it, I'm curious to find out if physical _size_ take away from the intimidation factor as well (you thought the XBOX360 was big? Compare it to a PS3; it's almost as large as my stereo receiver. The Wii looks like a external CDROM drive). I'm sure that it's a combination of one those factors (and a whole slew of unforseen ones that I haven't thought about during my breakfast right now), but it interests me from a marketing perspective, along with a 'attract-new-users-like-my-sister-who-hates-videog ames' perspective.

    31. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Shrubber · · Score: 1

      She and her family won't buy a new console for at least the first six months that it's out because they want to see what actually comes out for it, what others think, how many bugs it has, etc.
      I agree with this and do the same myself, usually. I don't think that I have ever owned a console within six months of its launch, except maybe the original Gameboy. However when it came to the Wii there are already sufficiently fun games out right now to have made it worth the purchase for me. Not necessarily for everyone else, but for me there was no reason to adopt a wait and see approach to the Wii when I played games and enjoyed them from day 1, and there were at least 3 games that I enjoyed.

      I waited seven or eight months before deciding there were enough Xbox 360 games to make it worth the purchase for me, and I'll wait the same before evaluating the PS3 titles. But the Wii is a winner from day one, for me at least.
    32. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Nearly every game these days is slammed up against the 4 GB wall.

      FYI: The 360 games, at least, can use DVD9. Not sure about the PS2.

    33. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, but I am amused by it. To me the absolute worst designed controller in history was the Gamecube's. It seems Nintendo had to take it to one extreme before doing it right.

      Finkployd

    34. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by plastid · · Score: 1

      I bought my Wii at launch this year because the first round of consoles generally end up being the most moddable. I have a feeling that I'll have some nice Wii-mod projects in a few years when the next systems come out.

    35. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, even my parents play Wii Bowling with me without too much confusion about how to play it. The last video game my dad played was pacman...

    36. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      And whats wrong with being like ever other game system.

      There is nothing wrong with being exactly like every other gaming system but it does make you easily replaceable.

      Game systems have evolved to the point their at for a reason. Should we all just spontansioullly evolve a third arm with seven fingers on it just becuase its new and might be useful in some situtations. Its taken game system developers years to find the perfect balance. The controller (Which is the only unique thing about the wii) has evolved over the years to meet the needs of the widest area of game types, and I think the current format used by Microsoft & Sony while not perfect is a lot better general use controller.

      I have to disagree with you on this one, largely because game controllers have not really evolved to meet game requirements as much as games have evolved around the limitations of the controller. Consider that FPS, Flight Games, Racing Games, Fighting Games and Rythm games all have specialized input devices which emulate the activity far better than any game pad and that most other games don't replicate the activity they're attempting to well at all (sports games). People have (since the dawn of videogames) been posed with the question of how do you map complicated activities to simple button presses and (over time) have become very successful, but this does not imply that the button presses were ever a good way to do things.

      Ninentdos contoller is fun for certain types of games speciifically designed for it, but I think its going to end up being an annoance for most games in the long run.

      Ever played the same FPS on a console as on a PC?

      I'm willing to bet that you were reasonably annoyed with the controls on the Console version as compared with the PC version.

      Could you imagine playing World of Warcraft on your PS3?

      I couldn't imagine how Blizzard would map dozens of activities to a controller that has such limited functionality; if they were remotely successful I'm willing to be that you would be reasonably annoyed with the controls on the Console version as compared with the PC version.

      The fact is that any game that is not designed for a certain input method is (likely) not going to be very enjoyable using that input. The advantage of the Wii is that it has far more input potential than a conventional controller does (both in the number of activites and the complexity) so it is likely that it will be easier to port controls to the Wii than away from the Wii. Consider that with a tennis game you could have a lob, regular shot, or smash handled by the direction of the swing with the rotation of the hand through the swing handling top-spin, bottom spin, regular spin; essentially you get 9 variations of shot which would be reasonably difficult on the XBox controller.

    37. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      That's all good and fine, and right in line with Nintendo's stated philosophy about this console. I'm quite happy to hear that girlfriends, mothers and siblings that have never really gamed are now getting into the groove.

      However, I've been playing video games for quite some time and I don't find the Dual-Shock controller intimidating in the least. And I'm quite happy to see improvements in the PS3 controller. The new triggers, especially, will make a real difference in the kinds of games I like to play.

      Even if I did feel a need to play video games with my girlfriend (it might be fun), that's not going to take away my desire to play the more complicated games. I could see having two boxes, but I wouldn't really be satisfied with just a Wii. Yes, the Wii controller is very nice for certain things, but it's not superior to the controllers of the other consoles, just different.

      BTW, my next-door neighbor has a Wii. He's trying to get four controllers for it. I bought him one for Christmas at the local Target, which wasn't easy because they're kind of in short supply. I was a little surprised to see it costs $40, but it was still better than a $50 PS3 controller. Then he told me that he'd need the "nunchuck" attachment for another $20 because most of his games required it. I mention this primarily because you and others have commented on how inexpensive the Wii can be. If you want to have a great time with four people, like they show in much of the advertising, count on adding another $120 (base controllers only) to $200 (everyone gets a "numchuck") to the price of your Box. Sure, you'd spend close to that to have four people play a PS3, but the types of games on the PS3 are much more often suited toward one or two people. I guess the price of having a great party is, well, paying for the party.

      TW

    38. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      i own both and in theory, you are right; it /should/ work better that way. however in application the PS3 seems thusfar to have better AI/ physics. i own both, and it seems that the PS3 is just able to handle more objects/ decisions at once and without as much "AI stupidity".

      granted its probably just a shortcoming on the developers' part and a few months from now i will eat my words here, but so far your point has yet to be proven; especially since the 360 has a one year advantage.

    39. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The PC didn't have a "raw power" advantage in those days. What it had was a monopoly in the business world.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    40. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      on video games. She and her family won't buy a new console for at least the first six months that it's out because they want to see what actually comes out for it, what others think, how many bugs it has, etc. I'm not surprised in the least now because the PS3 is very expensive, said to be rushed in a number of areas, and well, wasn't quite worth the hype.


      That's common sense speaking.. just like with a new model of car.

      As a former Dreamcast fan, I'm not surprised. Sony's hype engine is a double-edged sword. On the one hand it can really crush a poorly marketed, but good console. On the other, it set a bar that was ridiculous for their engineers to try to achieve.


      Yeah, the Dreamcast was pretty nice. I, unfortunately, was a Jaguar owner.. which had all the hype but none of the firepower. Why oh why couldn't they have at least stuck a MIPS R3000 in the damned thing instead of a 68k to assist Tom and Jerry?

      Anyway, I'll be waiting six months as well on both PS3 and Wii.

      Hmm.. the word verification wants me to type "bowels".. no joke.. after I'd just finished reading somebody's Xmas adventure above.
    41. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      I consider the Wii worth it on gameplay alone. Wii Sports is a hoot (especially at gatherings) and even if you can get nearly identical graphics with Zelda on the Gamecube, you're not getting the same experience.

      Add in a low price and the nostalgia value of the virtual console and it's hardly "utterly pointless". Maybe not worth it for you personally, but that's another issue altogether.

    42. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      To me the absolute worst designed controller in history was the Gamecube's

      I disagree. I think it was Nintendo taking its first teetering steps towards the design revolutions in the DS and the Wii.

      If you just look at the thing, the intended purpose of most of the buttons is a lot more clear. There's one huge central button, clearly trying to push designers towards simplifying the control scheme. The others are, I believe, intentionally given auxillary positions.

      Same for the control sticks. There are three, like other controllers - but with a big size difference to make sure you're looking in the right place. No one would EVER think to try to use the tiny little d-pad rather than the analog stick. And hell, even though there was technically a right-hand stick too, they never bothered porting Katamari. That's the CAMERA stick. That's the only thing it's used for.

      See? I'm not saying the experiment was a complete succes, just that it's clear what Nintendo was looking at doing.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    43. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by seebs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me put this ease of use thing in perspective.

      My in-laws were over a while back, with their kid (3 years, 11 1/2 months). He played Wii bowling. It took him two or three tries usually to roll the ball, because he has a hard time timing the release, but he could play the game.

      When they came over for Christmas, he asked if he could play bowling again. We set it up. At age 4, and a couple of weeks, he can play the game moderately successfully. So can my mother-in-law, who is in no way a gamer.

      Now, can he play as well as an adult who has better control? No. But he can play the game.

      FWIW, I got mine on release day, and just had to replace the first pair of batteries last night. Not bad at all!

      Only a few people in my extended family can get used to playstation controllers. Hell, I've been playing console games for something like 23 years now (since my Intellivision II), and I've had a playstation since who knows when, and I still can't reliably guess which of the four identical buttons will perform a given action in a game, and I can't always remember which position a given icon is. (The Nintendo/Sega thing of labeling them with letters is much easier for me.)

      Wii wins on learning curve, and also on accuracy. I don't know how well the PS3's accelerometers will work yet; I do know that, without the pointing device, you can't beat the Wiimote. Best console interface ever.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    44. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Not to be too negative about the PS3, but the PS3 is designed to be "Exactly like every other system in history ... only better"

      Good, because that's what a lot of people want as well. Sometimes you want to just lay back and play games and not be flailing around. I recently started playing Twilight Princess, and, to be quite honest, I found myself wishing that I could just press a button to swing the sword. The Wiimote is GREAT for the quirky games (Trauma Center is fun, and Wii sports is AMAZING - I can't even count how many games of tennis I've played), but give me a normal controller for the traditional games and don't make me swing my arm all night.

      That's where the PS3 really shines - playing the types of games you already enjoy playing, just with more complexity and better resolution. The sheer power and storage size will allow for quite a bit of engine complexity and huge, detailed environments, and as much as I hate to admit it, after playing games in high-definition, it's hard to go back to 480i/p PS2/Wii realistic-looking games (doesn't really matter for the cartoony ones). It's hard to argue with the benefits of an increase in resolution from 720x480i to 1920x1080p. How many of you still play PC games in 640x480 rather than at least 1024x768?

      There's a need for both types of consoles - a quirky one and a traditional one. I don't see it as Wii VS PS3 VS 360, but more as PS3 VS 360 and the Wii does its own thing on the side.

    45. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're a shortsighted idiot. 640k will be enough for everyone, too, and we'll never need more than 20MB hard drives.

    46. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Could you imagine playing World of Warcraft on your PS3?

      Sure. I chose to play Final Fantasy 11 on my PC using a USB controller that was basically a dual-shock clone, and it worked amazingly well. I was irritated when I started playing WoW and couldn't use it.

    47. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by bynary · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree with you more. Bravo...

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    48. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      The Wii is almost worth it for Wii Sports alone. There's just nothing else like it. And Zelda is impossible to find for 'Cube, so good luck playing that if you don't have a Wii. I usually wait about a year or so after a console comes out to get it, but the Wii's different. Great games, affordable price. No reason not to get it.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    49. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by 7Prime · · Score: 1
      Broken d-pad
      They "broke" the d-pad into four buttons, and broken it is indeed! It's hard to press a diagonal.

      I have my issues with the PS controller as well, but this is not one of them. I would go as far as to say that it's the most usable D-Pad ever made. You're much less likely to accidently hit up/down when pressing left/right, and vice-versa. That is one design I'd like to see on all controllers. Nintendo's D-Pad's are alright, Sega's are terrible, and I haven't played enough games that use the XBox/360 d-pad to really decide one way or the other. Probably the second best d-pad to the PS controller is the VCCs and the one on the Wiimote is surprisingly good for being so small. Bottom line is, d-pads are problematic, and much harder to get right than analog sticks. Pretty much every analog stick I've played with (except the crummy as hell, but obviously prototypical, N64 stick) has been good to excellent, with the GameCube's sticks probably toping it off—the Nunchuck and VCCs sticks would be right there too, but the absense of any testured surface on its top makes it a little harder to grip.

      One thing that I think recent controllers should have taught us is that simply color coding, naming, or giving shapes to buttons is not enough. You're not looking at the controller, and frankly, mixing up "left" & "right" is really simple on a cross-shaped button layout. The PS controller makes this even worse by making the right and left circle and square, which are similar looking at a glance (and almost impossible to tell with small icons on the screen) and both reddish in color. I cannot tell you how many times I've mixed up those two.

      I think Nintendo had the right idea with tactile button differences. Sure, it might look a little goofy, but it really works well to distinguish functionality. It also makes the buttons prioritized, functionally: A and B are primary and secondary, due to their more traditional positioning and shape, and the jelly-bean X and Y buttons are auxillary, due to their slightly more complex and less obvious shape and positioning. I also think having 3 shoulder buttons was a GREAT move, as the primary Left and Right become distinguished by the fact that one shares a spot with a secondary shoulder button. Humans have problems with immediately distinishing sides of a mirrored image, so anything that creates some aesymmetry really helps. With the Nunchuck, the natural hand position, for most people, places the index finger underneath the L trigger, the fact that one has to move their finger to get to "C" trigger makes the differences immediately obvious. People might not remember the names of these buttons, but they sure know how they feel, and once they learn what each button does, calling up the correct muscle action to perform an action is instantaneous.

      Probably the most agreggious button programming scheme is the context-sensitive setup in the Metal Gear Solid series. Litterally half you're concentration goes to thinking, "okay, so now, what buttons do I have to press to be able to perform the correct action?" The game also requires incredible precision to be able to keep from doing certain actions, such as going from crouch to prone. Just when you think you've figured it out, you enter close combat, and the whole layout changes, without warning, to accomidate for a totally different style of play... and at the worst possible time too, when you should be doing quick and concise actions. The game is great, but the control setup is extraordinarilly terrible. Kojima has some great ideas, but he could learn a great deal from Miyamodo's emphasis on intuitive and simple control schemes. Miyamodo really is the king of intuitive control schemes: if a game's control scheme is too complicated... he changes it, or if need be, he changes the game.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    50. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by hab136 · · Score: 1
      The PC platform is an awkward piece of shit (segmented memory, no standard video/audio hardware platform, etc) to program for compared to many of the platforms it displaced

      Segmented memory - yes, you can use 16 bit segmented memory, but why would you? Most applications post-Win95 use 32 bit flat addressing.

      No standard A/V - that's why operating systems and toolkits exist - DirectX, OpenGL, DirectSound, OpenAL, etc. Individual game developers don't really need to worry about what cards are in the machine unless they're right at the bleeding edge.
    51. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where the PS3 really shines - playing the types of games you already enjoy playing, just with more complexity and better resolution. The sheer power and storage size will allow for quite a bit of engine complexity and huge, detailed environments, and as much as I hate to admit it, after playing games in high-definition, it's hard to go back to 480i/p PS2/Wii realistic-looking games (doesn't really matter for the cartoony ones). It's hard to argue with the benefits of an increase in resolution from 720x480i to 1920x1080p. How many of you still play PC games in 640x480 rather than at least 1024x768?

      As a PC gamer I can tell you that I have played games at every resolution from 1920x1280 to 800x600 in the past few years and the first thing that gets tossed when performance drops is the resolution; only when detail is set to low, AA and AF are turned off, and the game starts to perform poorly at 800x600 do I start to consider the need for an upgrade. Higher resolution is really nice in games with lots of text but past 1024 x 768 (with good AA and AF) a higher resolution is a luxury which doesn't offer much to gameplay at all.

      You also mentioned "Higher Complexity" but I haven't seen too much of a complexity increase in games recently. With few exceptions, games have retained the same complexity they have had for nearly a decade with all the increased performance going to "prettier graphics"; the perfect example of this is FEAR. FEAR is a game where the designers decided to go for pre-rendered lighting through-out the entire game which means that the environments are (pretty much) entirely static; in 1998-2000 (before the PS2) there were tons of games which were far more dynamic than FEAR was. AI hasn't changed much, as (pretty much) all games use the same scripted AI that has been available for the past 10 years; it was cool in 1998 when you could script a Soldier to take cover but it has been done to death with little advancement.

      There's a need for both types of consoles - a quirky one and a traditional one. I don't see it as Wii VS PS3 VS 360, but more as PS3 VS 360 and the Wii does its own thing on the side.

      I don't disagree, but I have to ask you is what (besides flashy graphics) does the PS3 or XBox 360 offer that wasn't available on the PS2/XBox?

    52. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading at girlfriend, because you're obviously a liar.

    53. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by smash · · Score: 1
      Segmented memory - yes, you can use 16 bit segmented memory, but why would you? Most applications post-Win95 use 32 bit flat addressing.

      Back when the PC started to take over the computer-gaming market, it was still using segmented memory with EMS, XMS, or protected mode DOS-extenders. There was no direct-X api, no openGL (well it existed, but not on the PC), etc. Think Wing Commander, Falcon 3, Strike Commander, Privateer, Doom, Quake, etc.

      Of course, now things are different, but when the PC first started making inroads (before Windows 95) it was painful to deal with. When the 486 came out, it wiped the floor with most of the desktop computer competition in regards to CPU horsepower. Go try playing Wing Commander on an Amiga, and compare to the experience you get on a 386DX with Sound Blaster.

      My point is that the PC "took off" as a gaming platform long before the ease-of-programming arrived.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    54. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by smash · · Score: 1
      The PC didn't have a "raw power" advantage in those days. What it had was a monopoly in the business world.

      Sorry, but you're wrong. Compare Wing Commander, Falcon3, Strike Commander, Doom, Ultima Underworld, etc to anything available on any other platform in 1992-1994. The only desktop machine with enough power to run games like that was the PC. The mac was still mostly 68k based, which, although a nice CPU to code for, is under-powered compared to the 486s of the day.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    55. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

      Having said that, both the GC and XBox are dying or on their last legs, and the PS2 seems the only moderately healthy last-gen console.

      I bet that none of the next-gen consoles will genuinely offer playing most types of media over a network without any silly add-ons or restrictions. I think my Xbox, with the help of XBMC, will long outlast the usage of my PS2 or GC.

      Although I imagine my usage may not be the norm, I don't think it's all that rare, either.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    56. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by hab136 · · Score: 1
      My point is that the PC "took off" as a gaming platform long before the ease-of-programming arrived.

      Ok. Your post before said that "The PC platform is an awkward piece of shit", not that it "was", and just I wanted to point out that those concerns aren't really valid any more. Glad we're in agreement.
    57. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Games? You want me to compare a platform's power by the games!?

      This is how I compare: In those days (late 80s, not early 90s by the way...no Amigas or Atari ST in the early 90s) I was a MS-DOS developer. I moonlit by writing programming books, including one for the Mac. I also did a proposal for an Atari ST book, and so spent a fair bit of time coding on that thing. At the time, power was roughly equal on the three machines.

      But you're ignorance really shows when you talk about games, because the Amiga was, hands down, the most powerful game computer in the late eighties. It was the first computer to have a separate graphics processor and so completely kicked the PC's ass on terms of games.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    58. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by KeiichiMorisato · · Score: 1

      Button names
      Cross, triangle, ball, square? Fuck! Talk about counter-intuitive. It takes time to memorize where each button is. It'd be easier if it used letters like every other controller out there.

      I agree with your comments. Here is an interesting observation of the buttons.

      Circle = 1 line
      Cross = 2 lines
      Triangle = 3 lines
      Square = 4 lines

      I think somewhere, someone thought it would be smart that instead of naming them 1, 2, 3, 4, that it would be "cool" to use abstract numbering.....
    59. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by powerlord · · Score: 1

      The major difference though is interaction with other people.

      The iPod was designed to be used by one person.
      The Wii was designed to be used by a one or more people ... only in the same place for now (no titles supporting on-line play yet?)

      In contrast the XBox 360 seems to have very robust on-line multi-player support, and the PS3, while not as robust as the XBox 360's support, certainly seems to be heading in the correct direction.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    60. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by smash · · Score: 1
      Well, given that we're talking in the context of gaming console, yes.

      Or would you rather compare the range of business applications on the Amiga to on the PC?

      First up, I'm talking about the early to mid 90s, not the late 80s. I used to own an amiga and dabbled in 68k assembler on it, i'm fully aware of it's capabilities. I sold it for a PC in 1992, specifically because of it's lack of processing power, which was most apparent on Wing Commander (which didn't even come out for the amiga until a few years later, and was a disappointment after playing the PC version and WC2 years beforehand), Indy 500, Microprose F1GP and virtually any other polygon based game you care to mention.

      What killed the Amiga (for me in any case) was:

      1. VGA - the AGA chipset was too little, too late
      2. 3d processing / lack of cpu power. All of the amiga's custom chips for moving sprites are totally useless for processing polygons, and by the early/mid 90s, this is where games were heading. I re-iterate - go play wing commander on a 386 and then compare to the experience you get on an Amiga 1200. The A1200 is like a slide-show, the 386 is fluid. Also, chances are you'll be swapping 3.5" floppies on the amiga, unless you're one of the very few who had a hard drive
      3. Expensive hard disks - The A500/2000 were SCSI only, requiring an expensive SCSI adapter. The A1200/4000 were IDE, but the 4000 was an expensive machine, and the 1200 required laptop hard drives, which again, for the size, are expensive. Also, the 1200 was released far too late, and by the time it came out, a 14mhz 68020 was mediocre.

      I'll agree with you - in the 80s, the amiga reigned supreme, and was awesome for 2d sprite based gaming. However, as the 90s rolled on (when the PC really started to dominate), 3d became more important, and the amiga's custom chips were no use for it.

      If the A1200 came out 1-2 years before it did, and included a 68030 processor at a competitive price, maybe it would have evened the score a little bit. It didn't and commodore went broke.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    61. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by smash · · Score: 1

      Yeah no worries, my bad. I realised i should have used "was" after I hit submit :D

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    62. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by smash · · Score: 1
      This is how I compare: In those days (late 80s, not early 90s by the way...no Amigas or Atari ST in the early 90s)

      Oh btw... I can't get to wikipedia at the moment (wierd), but I think you're forgetting the Amiga 600/1200/3000/4000, all of which were on sale in 1990 or later. Shit, I bought my Amiga 500 in 1989, a mate bought his 1200 in 1993.

      Who's ignorant?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    63. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      And you're an idealistic idiot. The move from CD-based to DVD based game didn't get us considerably more content overall (and some developers, even less *cough*Squeenix*cough*).
      All it's gotten us is more and prettier graphics and FMVs. Since that seems to be enough to impress most of the Sony faithful, the idea that they're going to do any more work when they don't have to is naive.

    64. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by justchris · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. I believe it is superior to the controllers on other consoles. It is considerably better designed. It is more comfortable, it is separated into two parts, giving each hand a distinct function, and altogether it only lacks 2 buttons (4 if you count the rarely used buttons on the analog sticks). What this means is that it can do everything a 'standard' controller can do, and also has motion sensing (x2) and direct pointing, and is easier to understand. What part of that is not superior?

      --
      just some guy
    65. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      If your going to use that example Dinosaurs existed for millions of years

      Nowadays, in computers and technology, we consider a decade to be an eternity. It's all about scale, in astrology, the millions of years that dinosaurs existed are merely a nanosecond.

      where's the astroid hitting the game industry that requires such a huge shift in controller technology

      Right here

      What I'm saying is change for changes sake ussually ends in failure. Nintendo is like the goth kid that wears black becuase he wants to be diffent than everyone else and to stand out, but ends up just looking like a dork with black nail polish on.

      Nintendo isn't changing just for change's sake. It's changing because it realized that fighting the power-spec war isn't worth the money it costs (whether they are right or wrong is something only the future can tell). They also have noticed that most adults do not play video games or play them "casually".

      Those same adults, while not purchasing videogames last generation, still had an entertainment budget, and spent money on things that entertained them. Nintendo decided they could get part of that money, while Sony litteraly said to all those casual gamers and non-gamers "fuck off, if you can't handle 22 objects at the same time with your two hands (4 face buttons, 4 triggers, 2 analog sticks, 2 buttons while you press those sticks, 4 parts of the pseudo D-pad, 6 axis), I don't want you on my console". No wonder those people prefer Wii Sports to whatever the PS3 can offer.

      Nintendo changed indeed, but not for change's sake. They had very good reasons to do so.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    66. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      What part of that is not superior?

      The part where you gotta wave it around for almost everything. If you have a choice to wave or use the buttons, then I'll retract the statement. I've only really played one game on the system, but my impression is that you have to use the motion sensor. That's great for once in a while. That's superior for once in a while. But after a hard day's work, I think I'd rather just place my game pad in my hands, my hands on my knees, and kick back and play. And that's not even counting very long gaming sessions where keeping your hands in the air constantly could be a real hassle.

      Also, most of the buttons on the Wiimote stick are not as a accessible as those on a gamepad. It's not even in the same ballpark. It may be a lot of good things, but since the gamepad is superior for many things, that means the Wiimote is not superior over all. Just different.

      BTW, keyboard and mouse rock. Also not superior in general, but it just plain rocks.

      TW

    67. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Who's ignorant? The person who still hasn't figured out that the original post was talking about mid-to-late 80s.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    68. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "There are only Dreamcast fans who lament its early commercial demise."

      While showing off their spindle full of burned games.

    69. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by scot4875 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your example of Win95 vs. whatever version of Mac OS was out at the time is a pretty terrible one.

      Say what you want about it, but Win95 was the first end-user-oriented, preemptive multitasking, (poorly) protected-memory operating system. (We won't count OS/2, because we all know that despite its marketing, it was never end-user-oriented) Crow all you want about OSX, but '95 had been through 3 major revisions by the time it showed up, and Win2k showed up at approximately the same time.

      And as for it being DOS based, that's meaningless. DOS was used as a loader, nothing more. You wouldn't claim that your favorite Linux release was based on Lilo or Grub because they "run" before the OS does, would you?

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    70. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by rarkm · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the Wii may be as revolutionary as 'Pong'.

      Reasons?

      From now on, gamers that have played Wii will no longer be content to sit and blast aliens / monsters while their body sits in a chair in suspended animation for hours on end. Any game that doesn't have a great physical component will be considered obsolete. Wii has basically liberated gamers from the couch, and that's as big a change as 3-d graphics was when it first came out.

      --
      [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
    71. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by justchris · · Score: 1

      Also, most of the buttons on the Wiimote stick are not as a accessible as those on a gamepad. It's not even in the same ballpark. It may be a lot of good things, but since the gamepad is superior for many things, that means the Wiimote is not superior over all. Just different.

      That one is wrong. The positioning of the buttons you actually use on the Wiimote & nunchuk is actually better than on a standard pad. The A, B, C, Z and d-pad are all in extremely convenient locations, and for a game requiring quick reflexes, you end up having just as many buttons readily available on a Wii as you do on a PS3. The +, -, 1 & 2 buttons are a bit out of the way, but they are not usually primary action buttons.

      As for waving around the controller for everything, that is highly dependent on the game. In a game like Zelda, you have to wave the controller to move the sword, but this is not especially onerous as it is gesture based, not direct movement so a simple flick is as good as waving the controller. About half the games require no more movement than what you'd probably do unintentionally with any other controller. If all you feel like doing is sitting with your hands on your knees, the Wii works fine with that for about half the games. Those are also the games you'd have found on the PS2, GC or Xbox. The Wii just also happens to include an entire group of other games that wouldn't have been possible on the other systems at all, which don't really require a great deal of movement, but they work better without it. I mean, if you really wanted to, you could play Wii Sports leaning back on the couch and flicking the controller with altogther less movement than it would take to control an analog stick. But no one does that, because it's not any fun.

      The advantage of the Wii is that it still has buttons, still has a d-pad, still has an analog stick, it just adds motion sensing and direct pointing to the existing input options. It also separates the controller, and provides an overall better design. If you just want to sit there (and believe me, I guarantee you there is no way you could ever possibly be lazier than me, my primary interest in the Wii is that it will finally generate a consistent group of RPGs that only require one hand to play, and can be played lying on my side in bed, sitting up requires too much effort) and barely move, the Wii supports that. And if you want to get up and act wild and crazy, the Wii supports that, too. It's like the difference between rocking out in Guitar Hero and tearing through a crowd of enemies in Dynasty Warriors. Two entirely different styles of play, and you go with the one that you prefer. The advantage is the Wiimote supports both styles of play automtically out of the box.

      --
      just some guy
    72. Re:Why I've adopted my girlfriend's philosophy by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Circle - near the round part of the controller
      Triangle (pointing up) - the top button
      Square - near the straight part of the controller
      X - the one left, and it's near the diagonal part of the controller

      L and R are good names for the triggers (better than "C and Z")
      I still think it sucks, but A,B,X,Y aren't any better.

      --
      ^_^
  9. Buyer's remorse by jours · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I tell you what...for all the hype around these things just a few weeks ago, I've had three chances to buy one (a PS3) in the last few days. One was a friend who bought two of them for Ebay and couldn't sell them at all. The other two times were regular retail stores while I was Christmas shopping. I passed all three times. Not sure why but the price of those things sure made me think twice.

    I can certainly see buyer's remorse sneaking in after people play it for a few days and realize that maybe it isn't $500 cooler than their old PS2.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Buyer's remorse by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Confession (and this will drop karma):

      When I heard the store I was in announce they had three PS3's, I figured they'd be gone in a minute and this was my chance to make a profit. I was able to get one.

      Then I found out, the hard way:

      a) They are superabundant on ebay and only selling for about retail.
      b) Amazon won't let you sell one unless you have a long history.
      c) Craigslist has "scalper hunters" who are flagging PS3 sales to get them removed.

      Because of a), it is unlikely that you can make much reselling it. I listed it in the local paper and only got a few low offers.

      I'll be returning it shortly. :-(

    2. Re:Buyer's remorse by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      (Not as good a story as the poster below, but still I found it interesting...)

      I brought some people over to play the Wii, some first timers, some geeks that knew about it, and most of them were interested in picking one up of their own. Being like one week left before christmas, 'wii-mania' was coming to a panic and the only way to score one retail was to stand in line early morning at your local target or bestbuy. My friends went on to coordinate for a hunt, so they split up and scouted ahead to roughly 10 stores to see how the lines were. They left at 11pm the night before, to find out that the 3 bestbuys were already camped out. Gamestop, EBgames, those were out too. Around midnight, they found a Target that had only 8 people in line, 15 units.

      So all 4 of my friends stood in line, keeping warm playing games to pass the next 7 hours. More and more people started showing up afterwards. Soon the line grew to around 30 people. The first 15 people ahead told the people behind them that there are only 15 units available, so they would be wasting their time. Some people turned around and left upon hearing the news, but not too many. During the course of the night, the manager would walk out making an announcement stating the same, still to no real effect. Eventually the line grew to around 50 people.

      At roughly 4am, the manager came out, stating that there were 20 units of the PS3 also available (the 60 gig model), and told them to start a new line. He also stated to the people 16-50th in line that they were NOT going to get a Wii, but if they wanted a PS3, they could get one. 8 people moved on over. There were 12 slots still available. Meanwhile there were still 26 more people standing in line for a Wii that were not about to get one. Seeing how the line to the PS3 was still short, two of my geek guy friends decided not to pass up on an opportunity to pick up a PS3 and ran on over to the PS3 line(the other two were girls clearly not interested in a ps3). That still left 10 units left for anybody to come pick up a PS3, and 24 hopeful people bent on getting a Wii.

      At 6:30AM, the manager comes out, starts handing out tickets. By this time, the Wii line grew 'pretty large.' After the 15 tickets were handed out, the manager threw up his hands and stated, "No more!!" which got the remaining people standing in line pretty angry (especially the 16th person, she freaked out trying to build up an excuse on why some people ahead of her didnt' deserve to get a ticket). After about 20 mins of tension, they left in anger.

      "There were still 10 units left for the PS3!" the manager shouted. But the crowd shouted obscenities at him and went home. My guy friends were absolutely baffled, and the girls were thrilled that they scored a Wii. After I woke up and met them for lunch, they told me the story of the remaining PS3 units, so I headed on over there - only to find out they were sold out by that time. I offered to trade my wii(plus remaining cash)for the PS3 to my guy friends only to be met with "Hell no!" because they were going to pick up a wii later on anyway. I wish I knew about the PS3... *sigh*

  10. More fanboyinsm. by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    From the linked article:

    I would love to confirm these thoughts, but all of the people I've tried to contact to ask why they're selling their systems either declined to comment or didn't have time.

    And posted anonymously by Jason, no less.

  11. the real reason by Daltorak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The real reason why people are switching from PS3 to Wii:

    This commercial.

  12. How is this news? by cdogbert · · Score: 4, Funny

    People are trading PS3's and Wii's for money, too! Shocking!

    1. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know how many of these people were EBay prospectors who never had any intention of keeping the PS3 in the first place.

      Then again the story "People flood EBay with PS3s, can't turn a profit, attempt to get rid of their 'investment' some other way" is much less sensational.

  13. From the actual article by still_sick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not the linked article, the article the linked article linked to...

    In my search of Austin, I only turned up 6 total people who wanted to trade their PS3 for a Wii, so I moved on to New York City, which boasted a pretty substantial 18 desired trades. Here's where it gets crazy: in San Francisco, there are 48 different PS3 for Wii trades going on at this moment. Now, keep in mind, most of these trades are requesting a Wii plus cash difference, but there is the occasional barter that will take a loss just to get their hands on the latest Nintendo console.

    So to summarize - the "occasional" person willing to trade a PS3 for a Wii straight up warrants another Slashdot front-page zOMG SONY IS SO SCREWED wankfest.

    The fact that MOST of the trades want the Wii + the cash difference is apparently totally irrelevant. Tell you what, I'm willing to trade my brand new video iPod for some used dental floss and $1,000. Now someone write an article about this amazing new trend of people shunning Apple in favor of OralB!

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:From the actual article by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that recent Apple Music Store story: Online music sales at the Apple Music Store are plummeting (oh, and so are everybody elses, some even more than the Apple Music Store).

    2. Re:From the actual article by shadowmas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's ok if people ask for the cash difference the main point of the story is that people seem to prefer having a Wii to a PS3. and this is bad for Sony since if most people regret buying a PS3 and pass on the message to their friends it might tip a few buying decision to the favour of Wii.

      on the other hand 70 or so trades out of (i assume) thousands of PS3 sales wouldnt really make much of a difference.

    3. Re:From the actual article by still_sick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's ok if people ask for the cash difference the main point of the story is that people seem to prefer having a Wii to a PS3. and this is bad for Sony since if most people regret buying a PS3 and pass on the message to their friends it might tip a few buying decision to the favour of Wii.

      on the other hand 70 or so trades out of (i assume) thousands of PS3 sales wouldnt really make much of a difference.


      But how many of the "70 or so" traders NEVER wanted a PS3 - buying them only to resell it for a profit?

      Now that EBay prices are nearing MSRP, how many of the people just want to get rid of their 'investment'?

      I personally know one person who camped out for a launch PS3 only to resell it, then use the profits to get himself a 'free' Wii and big Plasma TV. His big dreams very quickly shrunk to simply wanting to get rid of the PS3 (that he bought but NEVER wanted) without taking a loss, and just buying a Wii with his own money.

      The whole assumption that this is happening because all these people are SO disappointed with their PS3s and the Wii is SO superior is a gigantic leap of logic.

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    4. Re:From the actual article by BurningRanger · · Score: 1

      That's not insightful, and it doesn't make a lick of sense. If someone is willing to trade a PS3 for a Wii + cash, it is essentially the same as wanting to return the PS3 to the store and use the return money to buy a Wii. However, it is impossible to get a Wii at stores right now, and presumably most of these people are unable to return their PS3's for anything other than store credit. If they were trading PS3's for money (i.e. selling) then yes, your cynicism would be warranted. But the idea here is - people are trying to get rid of PS3's and looking to instead try a Wii. The existence of a cash difference doesn't mean anything - other than trying to recoup the losses incurred from buying a $600 console.

    5. Re:From the actual article by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      1) find a sucker with a wii (ebaying for $500) to give you $380 + Wii for your PS3.
      2) sell wii for $250.
      3) Final take = 380+250 = 730 ($100 profit- not what you wanted but better than nothing).
      4) Buy console you actually want in march at a discount or as part of some kind of package with games.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:From the actual article by still_sick · · Score: 2

      That's not insightful, and it doesn't make a lick of sense. If someone is willing to trade a PS3 for a Wii + cash, it is essentially the same as wanting to return the PS3 to the store and use the return money to buy a Wii. However, it is impossible to get a Wii at stores right now, and presumably most of these people are unable to return their PS3's for anything other than store credit. If they were trading PS3's for money (i.e. selling) then yes, your cynicism would be warranted. But the idea here is - people are trying to get rid of PS3's and looking to instead try a Wii. The existence of a cash difference doesn't mean anything - other than trying to recoup the losses incurred from buying a $600 console.

      Yes, you're right - it IS the same as wanting to return the PS3 to the store and using the return money to buy a Wii.

      Except the summary and articles go on to claim that this because the PS3 is this and that and launch titles suck and blah blah blah - which is the ridiculous part. People who bought a PS3 with the intention to sell it never opened it, never tried it, and have NO valid opinions on it or its games.

      Claiming that these trades are some indication that Wii > PS3 is just as stupid as claiming that people are selling their Wiis on Ebay because the Wii sucks. No - that's NOT the reason. They're selling it because they bought it to sell it.

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    7. Re:From the actual article by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Grrr. Slash dot -- can't fix errors...
      2) Sell wii for $500.
      3) Final take = 380 + 500 (880 - 630 = 250 profit).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:From the actual article by Mikelikus · · Score: 1

      Well... I think you missed the point in the article.
      The point is: There is a significant amount of people that bought a PS3 and don't want it anymore. The secondary point is: Most of those people are willing to trade for a Wii+cash and even an odd case of trading at a money loss.

      --
      -- Would it be acceptable to just put my name on my sig?
    9. Re:From the actual article by still_sick · · Score: 1

      The point is: There is a significant amount of people that bought a PS3 and don't want it anymore.

      This is the exact point I'm arguing against.

      Many people bought a PS3 without ever actually wanting it (they wanted to sell it on EBay).

      The point / assumption that the people who are making the trade "don't want their PS3 anymore" is not a valid one, nobody ever did ANY research to find the traders motivations.

      It'd be just a valid to assume that they all the traders were failed-EBayers, then the point would instead be : There is a significant amount of people that never wanted a PS3, bought one anyways, never opened or tried it, and STILL don't want it.

      Which would quite obviously be a non-story.

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    10. Re:From the actual article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local stores on Xmas eve had 1=2 ps3's in stock... no Wii's....

      12 Wii games in the case, 3 empty spots for wii games.
      2 PS3 games in the case all three spots filled. Ps3 has crap for games on launch.
      Wii has almost ALL killer games on launch.

      Wii had several deliveries, cince launch day, all stocks sell out pallets full......

      ps3 still one in the case in it's box, day after christmas...

      Funny, how the Sony fanbois scream how popular the Ps3 is over everything else, yet it's easy to buy a ps3 at retail price, but a wii has to be paid a premium.

    11. Re:From the actual article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some are missing the obvious here: people want money. How many of these PS3 swappers (maybe 100 total?) received these as gifts and would rather have a Wii and a wad of cash than a PS3 right now?

    12. Re:From the actual article by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      No. That is not the same.

      It would be the same if you could go out and buy a WII in a store. Instead, Wii is sold out in the USA.

      As such, money becomes less rellevant.

      The fact that people are advertising a trade of PS3 in order to convince people to give up the rare, hard to get Wii, indicates that the Wii is not only sold out, but that people like it better than the PS3, despite the price differential.

      Otherwise, people would be advertising to trade a Wii plus cash for a PS3 instead of the other way around.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    13. Re:From the actual article by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      thank you. that is the MOST important part. the part that is greatly missing.

      if someone has had a PS3 since launch and has never opened it, they obviously never intended to play it in the first place. they didnt want the PS3 in the first place. alot of resellers were anticipating that sony, like the other console manufacturers, would not be able to keep to their shipping schedule; they held onto their PS3s hoping for demand to pick up again near christmas and supply would be low, thereby maximizing their resell profit.

      the console was bought in order to sell. now that sony has actually kept their promise to keep steady shipments, supply is higher. since supply is higher, prices on ebay have been reduced to reasonable levels. supply of wii have gone down, so there is a higher profit margin to be made on the wii.

    14. Re:From the actual article by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      "Ps3 has crap for games on launch.
      Wii has almost ALL killer games on launch."

      if you look at any game ranking site on the internet, you would notice that across the board sony titles are garnering higher overall ratings than launch wii games. i'm not saying that all sony games are great, but im just pointing out your inherent bias. so far there are two standout titles available for wii, and alot of "filler" games. you may argue that most of the sony titles are "filler" games as well, but still their ratings are notably higher.

    15. Re:From the actual article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much what I did. Except, I did it with Wiis and without standing in line (or getting shot at).

      Bought three Wiis (walk-in sale), kept one, sold two on eBay = almost free Wii (after you figure in eBay fees). Oh, and I love my Wii.

    16. Re:From the actual article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I personally know one person who camped out for a launch PS3 only to resell it, then use the profits to get himself a 'free' Wii and big Plasma TV. His big dreams very quickly shrunk to simply wanting to get rid of the PS3 (that he bought but NEVER wanted) without taking a loss, and just buying a Wii with his own money." Then you know one person who doesn't know how to keep a receipt and use a 30-day return policy.

    17. Re:From the actual article by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1

      In my search of Austin, I only turned up 6 total people who wanted to trade their PS3 for a Wii, so I moved on to New York City, which boasted a pretty substantial 18 desired trades. Here's where it gets crazy: in San Francisco, there are 48 different PS3 for Wii trades going on at this moment.

      So in a city of 600,000 there are 6 PS3's and in a city of 8.2 million there are 18 PS3's, which is pretty substantial. I bet that Austin and NYC both got the exact same amount of PS3's shipped to their city as well. You can argue the 48 in SF (population 800,000 might be a lot, but I think we can definitely discount the NYC factoid in this as being pretty insignificant. Especially because I seriously doubt that anyone in the country was shipped as many PS3's as these two cities, and considerably less are being traded in NY per person.

      Not to mention you can't measure how many of these trades are going through and also how many of those people are dumping their PS3's because they bought them to sell on eBay and none of them sold for the price they wanted. This whole article is a sham and smoke and mirrors. Let's get some real news.

    18. Re:From the actual article by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Actually, the SF figure is probably not even relevant, since the Sony Metreon got FAR FAR more PS3s than ANY other store, so there's probably just a higher amount of people here in EVERY category (people who bought to keep, and people who bought to sell).

    19. Re:From the actual article by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 0

      This entire scenario is based on the assumption that you can get someone to trade a Wii + $380 for a PS3. Hell, while we're making these hypothetical situations, why don't we go for the gold?

      1) Get some lame, idiot Wii owner to trade the Wii + Ten Billion Dollars(!) for PS3.
      2) Sell the Wii for another Ten Billion Dollars(!).
      3) Final Profit = Ten Billion Dollars(!) + Ten Billion Dollars(!). Not bad for a useless, baseless hypothetical situation.

      This way, you'll have Twenty Billion Dollars(!) instead of a measly $250. Might as well, as long as we're making things up.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    20. Re:From the actual article by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I just can't believe anyone would trade more than a WII and one billion dollars for a PS3 so I find your example ludicrous.

      ---

      Seriously- someone who wants a PS3 and their relative got them a WII might not be aware of the ebay frenzy or they might just want to get it over with. Or they might trade it for 280 and a wii- reducing the profit but still a profit.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  14. Imagine that... by sammaffei · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..people wanting to play something that's fun. What's the video game industry coming too...

    --

    Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  15. My Humble Opinion by NetJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Friend loaned me his PS3. Meh. If Resistance is THE game to own for it right now, save your money. GoW is 10x the game. The new GT HD "concept" demo is pretty good, but as for graphics I think PGR3 looked every bit as good a year ago. Physics in the game? That's a different story. Sony's network implementation leaves a LOT to be desired. I'll happily keep paying my $50/year Live membership over Sony's free offering. I couldn't even use my normal nickname since Junkie is a banned word on their service.

    I love consoles and I'm sure I'll end up with one...but it'll be at least 6 months. Luckily I just moved to a 1080p DLP set from my older HD RPTV that didn't do 720p. If I had my old set everything I've played except for GT HD would have been shown in 480p.

    1. Re:My Humble Opinion by adam34 · · Score: 1

      English?

    2. Re:My Humble Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow a fanboy modded up by fanboys

  16. More Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hype around the Wii is more than fanboyism, it's obvious that astroturfing is going on. Not that I think the other consols are any better - I pitty anyone who falls for one of those soul-less marketing black holes.

    -IAAAC

    1. Re:More Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a hilarious comment considering the Recent Sony Blogs

      Now, I understand that astroturfing is pretty common nowadays, but I think it's useless. With informed consumers being a larger and larger segment of the buying populace, hype will be replaced with at least some substance.

      The Zune is a failure because it can't compare, specs or price-wise, to the iPod. The PS3 has a tremendous up-hill battle because we can see the comparisons with the xbox360, and Sony loses on so many levels.

  17. Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The PS3 doesn't have motion-sensing technology. It has gyros that can sense the controller's tilt. No MEMS accelerometers, and no position sensitivity.

    It's a cheap knockoff, and everybody knows it except idiot Sony fanboys.

    1. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by dangitman · · Score: 0, Troll

      Gyros can detect motion, so I'd say your post is incorrect. After all, if it can detect tilt - then it can detect varying degrees of tilt over time. Varying degrees of tilt over time equals motion.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by bucky0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But it can't detect linear motion, which is what GP was complaining about.

      --

      -Bucky
    3. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Derekloffin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't know why this was modded insightful when it is wrong. The Sixaxis does detect linear motion as well as tilt.

    4. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      No, the GP said it did not detect motion if he was complaining about the lack of linear motion sensing, he would have said that it did not sense linear motion. Does rotational movement somehow not count as motion? Why are you reading things into the GP post that weren't actually written? From the grandparent: The PS3 doesn't have motion-sensing technology. It has gyros that can sense the controller's tilt. No MEMS accelerometers, and no position sensitivity. When he was talking about the lack of MEMS accelerometers, he was complaining about the lack of linear motion sensing because MEMS accelerometers detect linear acceleration. The technology behind them is pretty neat, and the physics is completely unintuitive, but that's neither here nor there. The PS3 can only detect rotation, while the Wii detects rotation, linear acceleration and can detect position using the sensor bar. That is the difference the (now) GGP was trying to make about how the PS3 controller isn't as neat as the Wii.

      --

      -Bucky
    5. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by bucky0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, whatever dude. Let me directly quote the entire post again:

      The PS3 doesn't have motion-sensing technology. It has gyros that can sense the controller's tilt. No MEMS accelerometers, and no position sensitivity.

      It's a cheap knockoff, and everybody knows it except idiot Sony fanboys.


      He says that there is no motion-sensing and then states that the gyros can detect the tilt. He's clearly drawing a distinction between the two types of motion. Yes, you're right, the controller detects rotation, but a lot of the cool uses of these controllers comes from detecting linear accelearations and getting spatial information.

      This argument is dumb. We're arguing about what an AC said. Good day to you, sir!

      --

      -Bucky
    6. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Shados · · Score: 2

      Because the everyday "street" definition of motion (as opposed to the actual definition), is synonymous with linear motion. When you're rotating the controler, in "everyday" vocabulary, its not moving.

      Anyone with a brain capable of critical thinking would have been able to deduce what the poster meant by the tone of the post and its context. While you are correct in your statement, all you're doing is arguing sementics. Just about anyone reading the post would get it, unless they have extremly little deduction skills.

      Yeah yeah, the Sixaxis can detect rotating motion. Its still quite limiting. You're almost as bad, trying to make it sound like motion is motion is motion, when the motion detection on the sixaxis is quite limiting in practice.

      However, regardless of who's winning the e-pen war, I repeat the main point: the poster was most likely not trying to spred fud or whatever. They simply went with a common everyday (if incorrect) definition of motion. Big freagin deal. Just correct them and be on your way. No need to cry wolf.

    7. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by dangitman · · Score: 0, Troll

      He says that there is no motion-sensing and then states that the gyros can detect the tilt. He's clearly drawing a distinction between the two types of motion.

      No, he's not clearly drawing a distinction between anything. He's deliberately obfuscating the truth. Remember, the title he gave the thread is "wrong, wrong wrong" - and the statement that he is calling wrong is that the PS3 has motion-sensing technology. Which it clearly does.

      If he was drawing a clear distinction, he would say "The PS3 detects rotational movement, but not linear position."

      Yes, you're right, the controller detects rotation, but a lot of the cool uses of these controllers comes from detecting linear accelearations and getting spatial information.

      Which I agree with. but why did the AC have to lie to make this point? Gee, I wonder if it has anything to do with the "idiot Sony fanboys" comment?

      This argument is dumb. We're arguing about what an AC said. Good day to you, sir!

      Indeed. but the fact that the AC was modded up for misinformation is reason enough to refute his post. Especially as non-ACs defended the post. It's pretty clear it was a troll from some other sort of fanboy.

      I don't like Sony, I don't really care about consoles, I certainly won't be buying a PS3. But misinformation being treated as informative insight annoys the hell out of me.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go ahead and refer you to the other guy that posted.

      Have a pedantic day, good sir!

      --

      -Bucky
    9. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are sitting on tyhe deck of a rocking boat, wouldn't the average person conclude that they are moving?

      And you'd be right. You are moving relative to the water (but not relative to the boat) however in common parlance, the boat is not "moving", it's rocking. Hence the word you used. Hence the difference between rotation and "movement" the original posted pointed out.

      No, I'm not. Motion means motion - there's no room for semantic wriggle-room there.

      Well I'd argue that its not undergoing motion since its position isn't changing as it's rotating about its local axes, so if we represent it's pose by a 4x4 homogeneous transform, the 3x3 orientation part would change but it's 3 coordinates in XYZ space would remain constant. Hence it would be rotating but not moving.

      I believe the "crying wolf" was on the part of the original poster - who deliberately used inaccurate terminology to stir up slashdot anti-Sony sentiment.

      Well, as I said, from my point of view the terminology is much more correct than yours. :) Personally I don't know anything about the sixaxis, but if it only detects changes in orientation it's not a motion sensor per se.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    10. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by dangitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, we seem to have stumbled onto some kind of bizarro world, where "motion" doesn't mean "motion." For example, where a reply to one of my posts says that the "street" definition of motion doesn't include rotation. As if the average person in the street doesn't consider their car's wheels to be in motion because they are simply rotating at high speed. Or where an obnoxious AI is modded insightful, while a simple correction is modded as a troll.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by dangitman · · Score: 0, Troll

      however in common parlance, the boat is not "moving", it's rocking.

      Do you have any cites for this "common parlance" in which "rocking" does not involve movement? Or in which rotation doesn't involve movement? I don't know of anyone who would subscribe to this "common" parlance. They'd have to be pretty damn stupid to say that something which is rocking or rotating is not moving.

      Well I'd argue that its not undergoing motion since its position isn't changing as it's rotating about its local axes... Hence it would be rotating but not moving.

      That's just fucking retarded. Motion does not just involve a displacement of the co-ordinates of the center-of-gravity of an object, it involves any part of it moving, or it moving about a rotational axis.

      Personally I don't know anything about the sixaxis, but if it only detects changes in orientation it's not a motion sensor per se.

      Once again, fucking retarded, as changes of orientation are - by definition - movement.

      Another poster has also suggested that the sixaxis does in fact detect linear motion. I don't know if this is true or not, but it is beside the point, as rotation is motion. How else does the videogame respond with movement when you change the rotation of the device?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    12. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dangit is just being an idiot -- ignore this idiot

    13. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by powerlord · · Score: 1
      That is the difference the (now) GGP was trying to make about how the PS3 controller isn't as neat as the Wii.


      That may be, however it is only overshadowed by the release of the Wii-mote.

      Compared to the other previous generation controllers (or the XBox360s, it looks like it rocks).
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    14. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The difference is that the Wii can detect position.

      Yes. Change in position is motion.

      Detecting rotation only is detecting a component of motion; it is not detecting the whole thing and it is fair to say that something that detects only rotation is not detecting motion. Motion implies both rotation and change in position. That is a completely reasonable argument.

      "The PS3 detects rotation, the Wii detects motion" is a true statement, as is "The PS3 can not detect motion; it can only detect rotation".

    15. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by seebs · · Score: 1
      Oh, it's definitely a cheap knockoff, but:

      Google Cache of CNN Story

      (CNN story seems to be gone now)

      Sony Corp.'s "Sixaxis" controller for the PS3 also has an accelerometer. The six axises the name refers to are the three dimensions of space, plus three axises of spin. The company hasn't revealed who makes the chip.


      So, they claim to have an actual accelerometer, not just gyros.
      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    16. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Troll?! It's a sad day when pointing out the truth gets you modded down, and misleading and incorrect information gets modded up. Guess the fanboys just don't like reality.

      The Sixaxis does detect motion, both rotational and directional. Even elementary research will tell you this. It on wikipedia. It's in official press releases (http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/release/pdf/06050 9be.pdf). Heck, some games already use the the directional sense.

    17. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by ancient_kings · · Score: 0

      >> Just about anyone reading the post would get it,
      >> unless they have extremly little deduction skills.

      You're forgetting you are talking to a Sony fanboy....

    18. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong. by Shados · · Score: 1

      Hmm...correct. Silly me! :)

  18. Re:Still want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is that another Sony run website or is that real?
    I couldn't imagine anyone (who is not [in]directly paid by Sony) being all that interested in the PS3
    Maybe I'm wrong though ...

  19. PS3 60GB: $630 on eBay by Animats · · Score: 1

    A PS3 just went for $630 on eBay. Almost down to retail. We'll probably see the speculators trying to dump unsold stock starting tomorrow.

    1. Re:PS3 60GB: $630 on eBay by tgd · · Score: 2

      They've been selling well below retail for about ten days now, most of the time.

      Silly, actually... once the market dropped I'm surprised people didn't just return them.

    2. Re:PS3 60GB: $630 on eBay by TimTucker · · Score: 1

      I'd actually seen reports on a forum of exactly that happening -- EB/Gamestop employees seeing the same systems come back to the store 2-3 times within the same day as people buy them, see that the eBay prices have fallen, then immediately bring them back.

  20. PS3 sucks by mrshowtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I own all three systems and generally don't play favourites, but I have had the most fun on the 360, followed very closely by the Wii and I have had NO fun with any of the PS3 games. The PS3's "showcase" game: Resistance: Fall of Man is a joke, a total and utter joke. My friends came over and watched me play the game from the start without sound (we had yet to hook up my Christmas present (new audio system) and were laughing our asses off at how stupid EVERYTHING in the game is. The A.I. is sooooooooo stupid. It sticks it's head out, shoots, takes cover: rinse, repeat. I mean, come on, Half Life, TEN YEARS ago has better A.I. Everything in the game looks cartoony and crappy, especially explosions. I can't believe how anyone is giving RFOM good reviews. Honestly, if you put this game in the PS2 kiosk at a mall, nobody would look twice. I was expecting at least Half Life 2 level graphics, not PS2.5 graphics. Yes, I know super, uber games are coming out this time NEXT year, but that's an awful long wait to shell out $600 bucks (minimum) for what Sony touts as the "true" next-gen. Sony has already lost this war, and everyone knows it. Just look at all of the developers jumping ship, producing 360 versions of supposed PS3 only games. Also, don't forget that the Wii development kit is only $3,000, so you'll see a lot of really fun, inventive, games on the Wii. Sony is in a no-win situation. The public perception is that the 360 is just as powerful, if not more powerful than the PS3 and it costs upward $300. Coupled with the fact that Sony is losing at least $300 on each PS3, it's hard to see how Sony can pull this one out, let alone attain the number one spot again.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:PS3 sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah freaking blah, all I hear is the same shit everyone was saying when the XBox hit the market.. I'll paraphrase:

      OMG why would ANYONE want an XBox, there are more games on the PS2 and they're SO MUCH BETTER and really, who's going to pay all that extra money for the XBox graphics when the PS2 games look good and will just end up looking better as developers get better. <insert launch title name> isn't even that good, why the hell should I spend so much money now on a console that will only get cheaper and won't have good games for months yet???

      I mean, really, can anyone tell me the difference between the paraphrased post above and the parent to this post? The XBox launch title lineup was total garbage (ooh, look, some racing games, whoo..), the price was too high, everyone was laughing about how it was the ultimate joke of a console.

      You're having more fun with the 360 because it has more titles. For fuck's sake, it's been out a full year!!! Compare launch titles of the 3 systems, the Wii is the clear winner there.

      And this is coming from someone who has no interest in any of these consoles. I don't care if Sony, Nintendo or MS wins here. I'm just sick to fucking death of seeing the same +5 scored items that I saw when the XBox game out.

    2. Re:PS3 sucks by ryanw · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I have had the most fun on the 360, followed very closely by the Wii and I have had NO fun with any of the PS3 games. Sony has already lost this war, and everyone knows it.


      Boy oh boy. You obviously know nothing about these consoles. The XBox is a powerful machine, but the PS3 is THREE times more powerful. Sure, the games are currently "alright" on the PS3. But you have to consider, you can play just about all the PS2 games on the PS3 and the XBOX 360 has been out for an entire year. You're basing who's going to win based on what's currently out for XBox 360 to what's out for PS3. Comparing a year's running to a new launch is ridiculous. You hold onto that PS3, you watch. That thing is going to be putting that XBox 360 to shame. If anyone is to blame is you for running out and buying a launch console expecting it to have more amazing games then a console that has an entire year's worth of titles out for it.

      And for the record, read this DEVELOPER's Viewpoint of which console is going to win. This was posted on slashdot not too long ago.
      http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20061222/adams_0 1.shtml
    3. Re:PS3 sucks by Shados · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like there isn't a ton of developer's article stating the exact opposite.. Its anyone's best guess as to what will win right now. And 3 times more powerful? You're on crack.

    4. Re:PS3 sucks by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      Three times more powerful?

      Care to state a source? How does a statement like that get modded up?

    5. Re:PS3 sucks by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1

      3 times more powerful. No you got that wrong, it's infinately more powerful, as nothing will ever use the full potential of the PS3. Here's my source http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/1 2/20/1330252.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    6. Re:PS3 sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can play just about all the PS2 games on the PS3

      ..and you get all the bonus jaggies that only a $600 console can produce. Imagine the computational power that it takes to take a relatively smooth line then add an extra "stairstep" every 5 or 6 pixels. I bet they even do it with polygons, think of how many triangles that adds to the model!

    7. Re:PS3 sucks by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      True! I also noticed how crappy the AI was in that game. Compared to Quake4 that damned AI started acting like another player to the point that I wondered if I was playing online for a moment. No visible pattern (I did not get it cornered though) and it was doing things that I would have done to avoid getting shot.

      Yes I was given a couple of copies of Q4 for xmas!... we had a gory-death fest at the house with the family.
      (Gotta love it when games hit the bargain bin! $19.95 each!)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:PS3 sucks by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      Sony needs killer apps to retake the crown from the XBox360. They have lost quite a few exclusives in the last 6 months, and that *will* hurt them.

      Backwards compatibility is moot as the 360 has it as well. So what if it doesn't do every game, it does enough of them.

      Yes PS3 developers will catch up, but don't think that 360 developers won't learn some new tricks in that time as well.

      Sony should have *at least* copied XBox Live. For $3 a month (less if I catch a good deal on the service renewal) I get an online gaming portal that blows everything else away. Plus the prices of downloads are less, which makes up even more of the difference.

      As far as 3 times more powerful, I won't even touch that one. Remember the Sega Saturn? Remember "blast processing"?. A system is only as powerful as the games that are released for it....

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
    9. Re:PS3 sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the mandatory: "Don' feed the trolls" Resistance is a pretty good game. OK, GOW has the nice little cover mechanism. But 6 hrs. of gameplay is a bit too little. I would have been happier if Resistance had something like GOW's cover mechanism, but I can live without it.

      I hate all MS hero-types, Master chief, Marcus Fenix etc. GOW feels like a 2008 Chuck Norris movie, nothing more, nothing less.

    10. Re:PS3 sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not at all surprised by the legitimate bitching about the PS3 launch titles since they really do seem to leave something to be desired. However everyone seems to be comparing Apples to Oranges. The consoles to compare are the PS3 and Xbox360 since they are competing in the same realm; future high graphic systems and high def DVDs. The question we should be asking is: "Do you want an Xbox360 & Wii?" or "What about the Playstation3 and Wii?"

      Honestly people, if I asked you: "Would you trade your Wii for an Xbox360?" How many people would suddenly jump on that sweet deal? The answer is that the Wii is finally doing something new in gaming, it flat out spanks the competition senseless here. What have the other two consoles offered? Would you like your generic FPS, RTS, RPG, or other game served up on Blu-Ray or 3-DVDs, what a choice!

      A valid question might be asking which High End console is going to do better, and it is simply too early too tell. Of course here somebody is going to insert an idiotic comment about Resistance Fall of Man vs. Gears of War. To that I shall happily point out, do you have any other good games on the Xbox360 as an example? Oooo the silence! Maybe DOA Extreme 2? How about that exclusive Oblivion game! Oh wait....

      Basically what I am saying is that both consoles (PS3/XBox) are almost entirely devoid of unique good content at this point. The Xbox360 fans will continue to trumpet games about a big bad ass in armor beating up the creatures that are killing humanity off (one hero uses cover, another dual wields guns). Why? Because after an entire year that is all the system really has that is different. Sony will once again pull out the same recycled content: Final Fantasy , Devil May Cry , Ninja Gaiden , Nippon Icchi Game . Can you feel the innovation flowing from these mighty processing beasts?

      Price - Equal for now really. XBox360 + 50$/yr Live + HD-DVD >= PS3 (60gig model).
      Games - Currently aside from GoW, it is same old same old. Prettier. And PC games still look better.
      Patches - The XBox360 is ahead by a year, it now has _less_ bugs.

      The reason I would get a PS3 right now? Sony actually seems to be supporting dual booting with Linux. Microsoft, creator of the supreme OS known as Vista? Not so much. So slashdot Trolls, let us try and remember that both Microsoft and Sony have just been slapped around and reminded that people are looking for something new. Give the crown to the Wii this season, and let the jury debate about the high end when there is something new to actually compare.

  21. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, that's holiday drinking, too much rich food, and more holiday drinking for you.

  22. Nintendo needs to step up production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because it looks like the PS3 might go the way of the Dreamcast, and they are going to have a lot of extra hungry consumers. For all it's perceived worth, the PS3 is worth much...yet. It will be, if it lives long enough. But let's face it, we need them to come in third place or lose. Just like we needed Nintendo to come in 3rd/lose, like what happened. Winners become assholes, just like Nintendo once was, just like Sony is now, and just like MS will be(in the console world). But, it would be best if Sony doesn't completely quit. One thing that I wish never happened was SEGA's withdrawal from the race. It created less competition. Now if Sony's nightmare scenario comes true, and the PS3 fails, and they have to withdraw, or worse, they sell the gaming division to MS(most likely), I wonder if SEGA might jump back in.

  23. when you add in all the fees by 512k · · Score: 1

    ebay fees, paypal fees, shipping costs, sales tax on the initial purchase of the PS3...

    unless the seller is (over)charging $100 for shipping, they could have lost money on this sale.

    Compared to the Wii, which is still going for $400+ It's still worth a professional ebay sellers time to snatch them up as soon as they go on sale, and flip them on ebay.

    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
  24. Gamers - they want it NOW... by Marbleless · · Score: 1

    Part of the attraction of consoles is that it is immediate entertainment. Unlike most other forms of entertainment (going out, going and renting a movie etc), consoles provide entertainment RIGHT NOW.

    That is what many gamers want, right now.

    So is anybody really surprised that having to wait for games to be released isn't satisfying some gamers?

    --
    --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
    1. Re:Gamers - they want it NOW... by Shados · · Score: 1

      Even more so when by the time the good PS3 games come out, the PS3 probably will be somewhat cheaper... So the idea that good games will come later (some hints point at FFXIII Versus, the game I actualy want so far as it is made by the team of KH, to end up being released late 2008...) doesn't justify shelling out the full price right now.

      Wii however, has like 3-4 games I want now now now now now. But no Wii >.

  25. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by ImEric12 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My god, that was epic. For a second I could swear I was on 4chan. I had to triple check that this was slashdot. Well done, sir, well done.

  26. I wish I didn't, but I did... by saunderscc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...buy a PS3 at launch. It is an abortion. The Wii is fun, but it is a lot of hype, too. The controller is certainly unique, but I don't want to play it for 3 hours at a go. Plus, the graphics are lame. Neither of these have well implemented online infrastructure. I don't care about browsing the internet with a console. I just want to play games with friends around the country. If you can get over the fact that the 360 is a MSFT product, it does what it's supposed to do rather well. Ok, so there's no motion control. I'm already tired of the Wii control scheme. The PS3 is back in its box. Resistance is just another game--it just happens to be THE game for the PS3. Maybe I'll hook it up again when F1 2006 comes out in, wait for it, 2007. In the mean time, I'll have wasted a few hundred hours of my life on XBox Live.

    1. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by byteframe · · Score: 0, Funny

      Everybody stop bitching. Unless your posting to slashdot with webtv, sell off your stupid console and get an nvidia GPU.

    2. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by Raenex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The 360 is nice except it's too damn noisy. That and all the games for it assume you have a 50" HDTV (text is always too hard to read).

    3. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Regarding noise, I've seen the levels vary massively with 360s. My brother's console is no louder than a Wii, but my friends original 360 (which I persuaded him to return as faulty) sounded like a jet engine spinning up. Apparently it's all to do with the DVD drive... some of which seem horribly balanced. It's a concern to me too though, which is why if I bought one I'd be returning them until I got a quiet version. Seems like MS could increase their sales by quite a bit if they made a definitive fix and announce that they'd improved the noise levels.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    4. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by powerlord · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'll hook it up again when F1 2006 comes out in, wait for it, 2007.


      The start of 2007 is only about a week away, that doesn't seem very long.

      If the game is scheduled for the February release cycle then its about, 60 days.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F1 2006 comes out in, wait for it, 2007

      You mean next week?

    6. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by lubricated · · Score: 1

      Just the fans are loud on mine. Furthermore I live in Florida so during the summer I find myself having to augment the cooling with one of those after market intercooler things. So it's even louder. I love my 360 but the cooling is lame. I can't stick it in my crowded cabinet next to my ps2, It has it's own spot on a table a foot away from anything else. Isn't the console at some point in time supposed to leave the 1.0 stage and all the kinks get worked out? Usually about 6months after release which is when I bought it.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    7. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so many gamers didn't assume ZOMG 4 TRILLION FILLED POLYGONS/SEC meant games would all automatically be better, then it would be using less cutting-edge silicon with process shrinks to make it run relatively cool and this problem wouldn't exist. Since they do, it will continue and indeed probably get worse.

    8. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Wow. You live in Florida without air conditioning?

    9. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by lubricated · · Score: 1

      hell no. However electricity is expensive and during the summer many of us let it get pretty warm. The AC is more to reduce the humidity than heat, 80F is a reasonable setting for the area.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    10. Re:I wish I didn't, but I did... by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      By the time it's released, the 2006 game will be a full year behind the calendar.

      Compare with Madden and other sports games which tend to release games ahead of the athletic season they're named for, or at least manage to hit the same year.

      F12006 is also going to be behind the times given the amount of team changes that have happened since the 2006 season ended. Unless they plan to update it (and if they did, they'd surely change the name), the game rosters will look almost nothing like the upcoming 2007 season. And so it will be a late game and also hopelessly out of date.

      I don't think it matters too much, however, because F1 console games have a pretty bad history anyways. The game doesn't have to try hard. The last good one I played was Psygnosis' F1 Challenge on the PS1, circa 1999 or 2000. I got the XBox F1 game, played it, and sent it running straight back to the game store. Awful game.

      Another reason the delay doesn't matter is that Americans will skip buying it no matter what, and the rest of the world will buy it anyway just because it's an F1 game. Even late, it's got guaranteed sales. And Bernie already got his fee out of it.

      --
      Sig for hire.
  27. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by BTWR · · Score: 1

    you seriously realize that you have to break up with her now, right? :)

  28. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by jours · · Score: 1

    Wow, I just read that entire story and was sure the punch line would be about TMX Elmo. Guess not.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  29. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too bad they're not trading around 360 power bricks...one could say that they're hot-swappable.

  30. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ever hear of a courtesy flush? Nothing wrong shitting and flushing at the same time.

    --
    Good-bye
  31. Re:Can't rent games. by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 0

    This is a very old rumor that is false.

  32. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by SinGunner · · Score: 1

    Of course, since it's your "girlfriend" and not your "wife", none of us believe you.

  33. Re:Can't rent games. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    If that is the case then Rogers Video outlets should educate their staff.

  34. Re:Can't rent games. by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Huh? Do you have a link to back that up? I've gotten almost all my PS2 games used, so having that option taken away would be a showstopper for me buying a PS3, not just until they're easier to get, but ever.

  35. Re:Can't rent games. by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 1

    If he provides a link, it'll just be a link of some other misinformed person spreading incorrect rumors. I wish they just wouldn't talk about stuff they have no knowledge of, because now we have yet another person who "heard it from someone". Just don't repeat it. Let it die already.

  36. My parents just gave me a ps3 60gig with 3 games.. by davebo357 · · Score: 0, Troll

    R:FOM, ridge racer and that genji? game. I didn't open a single one, and plan on returning them. It took me hours of trial and error trying to update the firmware so i could connect to the ps store and get the gt hd and motorstorm demos, which i finally did. They're great demos, and i'll enjoy those for a while and start renting brd's through netflix, but aside from that i'll continue playing guitar hero 2 on my ps2 until some good ps3 games come out. Guess i won't get that Wii i really wanted.

  37. Ah, Geeks! by umbrellasd · · Score: 0
    So narrow-minded. I'll swap wives with you for a Wii! Wait, no...you can just have her. I mean, I insist...

    Gimme, gimme.

    1. Re:Ah, Geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as she's a willing partner in this scenario, i'll gladly give up my wii :)

  38. Mod this FUCK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, shut up.

    1. Re:Mod this FUCK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YOU shut up. (a different person) Mod xaosflux up, mod great-grandparent down.

  39. Re:Can't rent games. by radish · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm no Sony fan, but FUD is bad from any direction. Gamefly certainly think you can rent PS3 games.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  40. here ya go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hope that you enjoy all of these wonderful and fantastic gifts.

  41. I refuse to defend the PS3... by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 1

    But my fangirlism for Insomniac Games will not allow you to badmouth Resistance! Even if Sony is completely insane, Insomniac knows what they're doing, and the detail of theirs being the best game for the console right now proves that.

    I have no reason to believe that this game isn't top-notch, except for the detail of "I haven't played it yet". That should be corrected over the next few weeks at minimum.

  42. That's what I did by Eukaryote · · Score: 3, Interesting
    That's literally what I did. I went to Target a day early (the 16th) looking for Wiis at their opening. They didn't have them, but they had a bunch of PS3's, so I bought one.

    I ended up trading it today with a friend who got a Wii. I gave him a PS3, he gave me the Wii + 350. Best trade ever.

    1. Re:That's what I did by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I ended up trading it today with a friend who got a Wii. I gave him a PS3, he gave me the Wii + 350. Best trade ever.

      Is friendship worth anything to you, though?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:That's what I did by Coucho · · Score: 1

      Hey how cool is that!!? I traded my Wii + 360 with my friend today for a PS3... Wait a minute, Slashdotters don't have friends!... I'll go back to my corner now...

      --
      *pSig = NULL;
  43. And XNA... by beauzo · · Score: 1

    ...allows anyone to create their own games, albeit for a small fee (free for the Windows platform). After playing with it a bit I can imagine a lot of non-programmers putting together really cool--AND FUN--games. The PS2 Linux dev kit was cool, yeah, but was one hell of a hump to climb to get anything on the screen.

  44. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by megaditto · · Score: 4, Funny

    Brian, is that you?

    And yes, we will be giving you a PS3. And a Wii and a 360 after tonight. Just LEAVE ALONE MY DAUGHTER.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  45. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reminds me of something on alt.tasteless...

  46. I forgot one genre by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Oh, I forgot the booktype/story telling kind of games, of which the lawyer games seems the most liked but there are others released/in the works aswell.

    (Phoenix Wright: Ace attorny and the follow up, Another Code and the follow up, Hotel Dusk, ...)

    Also I guess the "non-game titles" should be mentioned, such as the brain training, cooking game, and such, which I don't care about ;D

    1. Re:I forgot one genre by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Exactly- the story games are what drove me to get a DS (the only good story game for the PSP is based off someone's blog- then again, said blog also got turned into a TV show and the blog is still up at http://yugure.ameblo.jp/ but I went off on a tangent there) especially Phoenix Wright which I played in Chinese (yay for fan translations) but wanted to support its further development for the US market. The non-games are especially helpful- I have a Korean and Japanese dictionary for the DS as well as a cookbook for the DS. Everyone seems to like the PSP better where I live, though- I'm the only person in my school with a DS (well, there are a couple of Indonesian students with DSes but they let them gather dust after they got PSPs) and even the teachers have PSPs. Of course, I'm in China so this may be because of the "pirate" culture here (when you buy a PSP here the store selling the PSP downgrades it for you and download the ISOs of your choice to the system to play) which makes a PSP cheaper to own as opposed to the DS (where people still have to buy a flash cartridge). I wish I had a PSP now though- LocoRoco and Katamari in particular are the reasons (as well as Densha de Go but I can get that for the Wii).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  47. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by spisska · · Score: 1

    Everybody gets the shits. And everybody's mama too. But I guess you didn't get your PS3. Or did talk of the PS3 remind you of a shit story? Speaking of shit stories, this one time when I was hitch-hiking . . . Or maybe you just didn't get that Wii you wanted. Which is why you're writing pointless shit stories on Slashdot instead of fiddling with your Wii. I didn't get a Wii either. Happy Christmas.

  48. Do The Math by DCstewieG · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh come on now. I get a sick pleasure out of all of the Sony FUD (the word is Schadenfreude) but this is just stupid. If 1000 people trade their PS3 for a Wii, guess how many people are trading their Wii for a PS3? Hmm...1000?

  49. Re:Still want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, getting busted for astroturfing once wasn't enough for Sony?

  50. Link to the original by crossmr · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why not link to the original story which actually has hard data in it? Rather than some copy which mentions "cragslist" (whatever that is) and uses vague weasel words like "a number of people". 1 is a number, 100 is a number, 0 is a number.

    http://gigagamez.com/2006/12/22/ps3s-being-traded- for-wiis/

    And the link was even right in the write up, no searching required.

    1. Re:Link to the original by dotbenjamin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      0 is a number No it isn't, it's a concept. Whoops!

      --
      Nothing like blowing your own trumpet.
    2. Re:Link to the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's on the number line, idiot

    3. Re:Link to the original by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      Not a number.. 0 is a placeholder - it's no more a number than - = + pr _ (they're all on the number line too)

      -GiH

      If idiots were trees, the US could blanket the earth with paper for inches.

    4. Re:Link to the original by crossmr · · Score: 2, Interesting
  51. No Next Gen by ShakaUVM · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hadn't been planning on buying any of the next gen gaming consoles. I have my PC, WOW, some other games, and a long backlog on my PS2 that I don't have time to get to. Why waste money? Especially since I'd need a badass TV to display the PS3 in all it's glory? I can feed my PS2 through my PC to play FF12 on my LCD monitor, and it's all right, though much uglier than even Quake1 (which I've gotten back into, incidentally -- Quake1 with Bloom is awesome. And free: www.customtf.com).

    But then I was hanging out with my family for the holidays and was trying to figure out something for everyone to do (nobody wanted to play Settlers of Catan yet again) when I suddenly realized that a Wii would be the perfect thing (we're all a pretty techie family). I went out to all the stores in the area, and found it's totally sold out, more or less everywhere. Bummer. And once the holidays are over, my desire to own one will drop back down to nil, since I'm not going to play my Wii with myself.

    1. Re:No Next Gen by notmuchtosay · · Score: 1

      Off topic but my friends that got bored with Settlers changed to playing Puerto Rico instead. Very fun. As for video games right now my friend and i split time on the 360 and the Wii. If we want more people involved it is only the wii.

    2. Re:No Next Gen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, just figured I'd mention that Settlers of Catan is coming to Xbox Live Arcade.

    3. Re:No Next Gen by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but my family has played out Puerto Rico, too. =) We've done most of the big selling games... my personal favorites right now are Domaine and the Great Space Race. My friends also like Ticket to Ride.

      Either way, I don't have much interest in a game system for myself, solo, but for family fun, so I think the Wii is a good choice. I'll see if I can pick one up tomorrow.

    4. Re:No Next Gen by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to play my Wii with myself.

      Afraid of going blind?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    5. Re:No Next Gen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Why waste money?

      You mean, why waste money on anything other than WOW?

  52. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by iamstretchypanda · · Score: 1

    +1 Insightful
    +1 Truthful
    -1 Reality

  53. Re:My parents just gave me a ps3 60gig with 3 game by KDR_11k · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your parents have way too much money. I had to buy my Wii myself since it's too expensive to be a christmas present.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  54. wii's success is because of zelda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while noone publicizes this and everyone 3's nintendo for making zelda so great (dont get me wrong im a huge fan, been playing since '86 :))

    the success of the wii RIGHT NOW is due largely in part to zelda. Would you rather play Twilight Princess, the sequel to the game widely regarded as the greatest of all time, or _yet another boring launch fps_?

    delaying zelda until wii launch is one of the two greatest business moves of the past two generations of consoles, the other being motion sensitivity

    it took 16 years, but nintendo is finally back on top of their game

    can they hold on?

    p.s. im honestly not trolling, i just lack social graces ;)

    1. Re:wii's success is because of zelda by !eopard · · Score: 1
      I've shown my Wii console to friends and family, and every single person that played wanted to get one. Even my Luddite parents (who use the PC I provided for them to play solitaire and freecell only) wanted to know what would be required to get a setup going for them.

      Not once did I drag out Zelda. The basic sports games appealed to everyone in one shape or form. Zelda would be too confusing. I've only played it for a few hours myself, over the last 2 weeks or so. I'll get into it eventually, but to say Zelda was the reason it is so popular? Not in my experience.

      --
      Boolean logic: True, False, and File not found.
    2. Re:wii's success is because of zelda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's completely because of Zelda. With the exception of Wii Sports there are no other good games for it.
      I've been really disappointed with my Wii and would rather have had a PS3.
      But Zelda is amazing and I bought it just for that. Wii Sports gets boring very quickly.
      And with no other good games on the horizon...

    3. Re:wii's success is because of zelda by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      It's completely because of Zelda. With the exception of Wii Sports there are no other good games for it. I've been really disappointed with my Wii and would rather have had a PS3. But Zelda is amazing and I bought it just for that. Wii Sports gets boring very quickly. And with no other good games on the horizon...
      If you like Wii Sports you'll like the minigames in Super Monkey Ball. There's about 50 of them and they're great party games. Some of them are simple, like Darts, some of them are like the games in Wii Sports but more complex (Squash, simular to Wii Tennis but you use the nunchuk to move your charactor, and Bowling, which actually requires effort to not get a gutterball unlike the Wii Sports version), and and plenty are just weird. I'm not sure what the main game is like, that might be fun, too. Raymon Raving Rabbids and Elebits are supposed to be a lot of fun (I haven't had a chance to play them yet). Wii Play (sequel to Wii Sports - Pool and Duck Hunt and Cow Racing) and Wario Ware are coming out next month, and later on we'll get Metroid and Smash Bros. Don't get disappointed with your Wii, just try some other games.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    4. Re:wii's success is because of zelda by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      I'm the only person who plays Zelda on my Wii. Nobody else has the least interest, nobody else has even touched it. Zelda sold Wii to us fanboys waiting in line in the cold on launch night, but the viral demand from our families and friends who'll buy Wii in the spring when it's more available - that is being powered by Wii Sports. Everyone played Tennis when I brought Wii back to my parents' house over Christmas. Almost non-stop, all weekend.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:wii's success is because of zelda by justchris · · Score: 1

      You're very wrong about that. Here are the list of good games for the Wii (that I have played, there may be more, but I don't play sports games, so I can't speak for any of those):

      Rayman Raving Rabbids
      Metal Slug Anthology (also available for PS2...eventually)
      Super Swing Golf (totally awesome game)
      Trauma Centre: Second Opinion (still good even if you played the DS original)
      Excite Truck (opinions on this are mixed, but I enjoy it)
      And of course, Zelda:TP & Wii Sports.

      --
      just some guy
  55. Personal Experience by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sunday morning (Christmas Eve) about 10AM we met my Dad at Best Buy because he wanted to buy the family a DVR. After wandering around for over an hour (and buying a DVD-R instead, d'oh) we passed a table in the front of the store where a manager type was standing over some boxes. He looked at us and said "Anyone want a PS3?"

    I realized he had four PS3s on the table. I said "No, thanks." and kept walking. Chuckling to my fiance about it.

    I remembered that a friend of the family was looking for one, so I started a long chain of calls to get in contact with them. Her son arrived a little over an hour later to pick one up.

    To see four PS3s sitting on the table.

    In the front of the store.

    With a guy asking everyone who passed if they wanted one.

    On Christmas Eve.

    This does not bode well.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:Personal Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Her son arrived a little over an hour later to pick one up. To see four PS3s sitting on the table. In the front of the store.
      Bullshit. I was at a Target a week before Christmas and saw a single PS3 being put on the shelf and went to go reach for it when 3 different people descended on it and pushed me out of the way to fight over who would grab it. The PS3 is probably the most awesome console ever invented and I can't wait to get my hands on one! Damn Christmas loonies!
    2. Re:Personal Experience by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      The PS3 is probably the most awesome console ever invented and I can't wait to get my hands on one!

      I'm glad I wasn't drinking my soda when I read that. :)

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    3. Re:Personal Experience by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Funny
      The Dreamcast is probably the most awesome console ever invented
      There, fixed it for you.
    4. Re:Personal Experience by powerlord · · Score: 1

      We're they the 60GB model, or the handicapped 20GB model?

      I've noticed that the 60GB models seem to sell out faster than the 20GB models. People keep claiming "Oh, we want the option to choose." "Oh we want to buy low and add our own features on." but when push comes to shove 90% of the buyers prefer to buy a "complete packaged product" instead of paying for the extras on their own.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:Personal Experience by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      You know, to be perfectly honest, I don't know. I really had no interest in acquiring one (my only interest in the system thus far was possibly scalping one in the days following launch, but that was a pipe dream), but I didn't ask. I do know that more than one 60GB model was sitting in one of our Malls' Gamestop a week before Christmas, but I don't know how long that lasted.

      Considering I know one person with an HDMI port on their TV (and that's me), I can't see why so many people would be hung up on getting the 60GB PS3 over the 20GB one...

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    6. Re:Personal Experience by Great+Beyond · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I was at a Target a week before Christmas and saw a single PS3 being put on the shelf and went to go reach for it when 3 different people descended on it and pushed me out of the way to fight over who would grab it.

      Must be a regional thing then. While I was out at the mall christmas shopping on the 23rd and 24th, I was keeping my ear to the ground for a Wii. Everywhere I asked for one, I was denied - but when I asked about the PS3 (more out of curiosity than a desire to get one), I heard stories of "Oh, theyre much easier to get. We've had them sit on the shelves for days at a time", and even found several of them on hand and in stock, sitting there cold as ice.

      Archetypal evidence? Certanly, but if people are having similar experiances elsewhere, there JUST might be a shred of truth to it.

    7. Re:Personal Experience by powerlord · · Score: 1
      Considering I know one person with an HDMI port on their TV (and that's me), I can't see why so many people would be hung up on getting the 60GB PS3 over the 20GB one...


      Actually both models (the 20GB and the 60GB) have an HDMI port, so thats no longer a factor.

      The 60GB offers:
      - a 60GB hard drive instead of the 20GB hard drive
      - integrated memory card readers (arguably superfluous if you already have one, but you might prefer to have it bundled into the device)
      - built-in 802.11b/g

      I expect that last point (and the larger hard drive), might be the reason some people prefer the 60GB model. Why get a third party adapter, or anything external that has to be plugged into the machine, or why buy a machine just to replace the HD immediately?

      Even if its "user upgradable", laptop hard drives are not cheap, and I bet your average consumer would rather not have to open up their console to change things.

      Remember, just because your average slashdot reader might feel comfortable doing these things, your average console purchaser probably won't.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  56. Modern controllers are freaking hard to learn by LKM · · Score: 1

    This is absolutely true. The prime example is a female friend of mine. Whenever the topic comes to video games, she explains that she doesn't play videogames because they're too complicated. "I'm too stupid," she'll exclaim. She's not stupid at all (she's studying law, and she's really very sharp), and she's also not not playing video games: She does play Donkey Konga and Dance Dance Revolution, and she loves Magnetica on the DS. She'd never even pick up a normal controller, but she does like playing Wii.

    If you're new to video games, the standard controllers are overwhelming. The Pong had a knob. The VCS 2600 had one digital stick and one button. The original NES controller had a D-Pad, A, B, Start and Select. Since then, every generation has simply added new stuff to the controller: an Analog stick, shoulder buttons, a second set of shoulder buttons, a second analog stick, more buttons, analog shoulder buttons, analog shoulder buttons with a digital "pressed" state, analog face buttons, analog sticks you can also press to create the effect of yet anoter button... People picking up a controller for the first time simply can't learn it in any kind of meaningful time frame.

    The Wii remote has gone back to the very beginning: Wii Sports needs two buttons, A and B, and that's it. And you don't even need the buttons during gameplay of most games.

  57. It's not fanboyism, but it's also not astroturfing by LKM · · Score: 1
    it's obvious that astroturfing is going on

    Oh, it's obvious? How is that obvious? Do you have any kind of evidence? Or could it just be that the Wii is freaking fun to play, and people like to talk about it?

    I agree, though, this is much more than fanboyism. But it's not astroturfing: People are simply genuinely excited about the Wii.

  58. Precious... by LKM · · Score: 1

    ryanw loves himself some scientific explanations of the PS3's superiority:

    You obviously know nothing about these consoles. The XBox is a powerful machine, but the PS3 is THREE times more powerful.

    Wow, three times more powerful! Who would have thought! And the modders declare:

    (Score:3, Interesting)

    Precious little Slashdot... :-)

  59. learn to draw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's just awfull

  60. Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

    Do you have any cites for this "common parlance" in which "rocking" does not involve movement? Or in which rotation doesn't involve movement? I don't know of anyone who would subscribe to this "common" parlance. They'd have to be pretty damn stupid to say that something which is rocking or rotating is not moving.

    Well I guess I may be a little coloured by my exposure to mathematics, but none of my friends would refer to a rotating body as "moving", but they're mostly physicists and computer scientists, so therein may lie the problem in the difference between what I consider "common parlance" and what you consider "common parlance"...

    So I'll offer up some references:

    motion (m'shn)
    n.

          1. The act or process of changing position or place.

    "motion." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. 26 Dec. 2006.

    While in mathematics rotation is defined as:

    The turning of an object or coordinate system by an angle about a fixed point.

    Weisstein, Eric W. "Rotation." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Rotation.html

    Which taking into account the previous definition of 'motion' means the object has not moved, as it's rotating around a fixed point.

    That's just fucking retarded.

    I guess that's one way to describe math. I imagine Pythagoras said something similar before he had Hipassus drowned for discovering irrational numbers. His shouting of epithets and subsequent termination (with extreme prejudice) of his student, however, did not change the truth behind Hipassus's proof. Extrapolate that experience onto our current one.

    Motion does not just involve a displacement of the co-ordinates of the center-of-gravity of an object, it involves any part of it moving, or it moving about a rotational axis.

    Well if I were to put a perfect sphere on the table in front of you, have you study it, hide it, rotate it, and then show it to you again and ask you if it had moved you'd be unable to give me an honest answer. However if I physically moved (noticed the word used) the sphere three inches to the left, you most likely would be able to tell me it was moved.

    Also, I said nothing about a center of gravity. In the case of the Sixaxis its origin will most likely be at the point that lies closest to the center of where it is gripped by both hands, which may or may not be its center of gravity.

    Once again, fucking retarded, as changes of orientation are - by definition - movement.

    To loosely quote a favorite philosopher of mine, "Who's definition, joker? Yours or mine?"

    How else does the videogame respond with movement when you change the rotation of the device?

    I don't understand this question as phrased. Following my best attempt to understand, this is my answer: A programmer can map any input to any action in a game he or she so chooses. If somehow I could measure the rate of flatulence being expelled from a player I could easily map that to forward movement in a game. So mapping rotation to movement is not at all difficult. In face, Rayman Raving Rabbids does that in several minigames: mapping tilting the controller to moving a character on the screen.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that most computer scientists minor in mathematics. That's apart from the fact that CS majors require a lot of advanced mathematics. Also, find a chair that spins. Sit in it. Spin around. Are you in the same place? Yes, you are. You've only changed your orientation, not your position.

    2. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Are they stupid mathematicians or computer scientists?

      Since most are PhD candidates, I'd hope not.

      And why would a computer scientist know about motion from their studies, anyway?

      Primarily from the study of computer graphics. Linear algebra also features prominently in most CS curricula. Anyone interested in doing physical simulations also needs to have a way to represent a position and orientation of an object, and a homogenous transform is usually an ideal way to do it. (Though my coworkers and I would argue a quaternion and position vector would be more efficient, but I digress...)

      Most computer components don't move, apart from cooling fans and hard drive platters. but then again, in electronics, a rotating hard drive platter is known as a "moving part" rather than a solid-state component.

      I don't think you understand what "computer science" is. You're talking about electrical/computer engineering.

      Right. A rotating element changes its place. Therefore it is moving. Q.E Fucking D!

      No, a rotating element changes its orientation, not it's place or position. Note that in the definition I gave the phrase 'place or position' is used to describe one thing, not two, for the sake of making the definition more accessible (since position is the more correct term, but 'place' is a more intuitive term for most people). ie: Place and position are synonyms. Plug one into a thesaurus and you'll find the other. ORIENTATION, however, has a seperate meaning from position. Hence why you'll find the phrase 'position and orientation' when discussion an object's pose.

      Anyway, I went over all that (implicitly or not) in my previous comment when I provided the references you wanted, but happily ignored. Is it safe to assume your argument has now devolved to "Because I said so?" since that seems to be all I can draw from your last comment.

      I've been unable to find out any real information about what sort of motion sensing capabilities this thing has, like what sort of chips it uses to detect tilt or displacement, so I'll just take Sony's word on it that it can detect motion as well as tilt. So the original post is probably wrong in this case, BUT is internally consistent if his thesis would have been correct, despite your claims otherwise.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    3. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No, a rotating element changes its orientation, not it's place or position.

      But a change in orientation is also a change in position. The molecules that make up the object have moved to a new position.

      Is it safe to assume your argument has now devolved to "Because I said so?" since that seems to be all I can draw from your last comment.

      No,. It's not because I say so, it's because of how the real, physical world is. Something that is rotating is moving. Its moplecules are moving. Only an extremely ignorant person would argue otherwise - or someone who was deliberately trolling. Which seems fairly likely from the bizarre arguments on this thread, and the mod-stalking going on.

      If you aren't trolling, I'd like to know - how do you rotate an object without moving its molecules?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Anyone interested in doing physical simulations also needs to have a way to represent a position and orientation of an object,

      Oh, I should add that I think you have some fundamental logic/semantic problems going on. For example, in our earlier exchange, you wrote:

      the boat is not "moving", it's rocking. Hence the word you used.
      You seem to think that a word which describes a specific type of a general concept somehow prevents it from belonging to the general concept. Rocking is a type of motion. Just as running and walking are types of motion. Just because we use a more specific word for something, does not preclude it from the larger category. Pretty basic stuff, which you don't seem to grasp. I think they cover this at a pretty young age in school. Would you say that someone who is running is not moving?

      So, back to "orientation" versus "position." Orientation is a subset of position. It is a type of position. So no, talking about changes in orientation does not preclude changes in position - because when you talk about orientation, you are talking about a type of position.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      But a change in orientation is also a change in position.

      Because you say so? Any regularly accepted definition of 'orientation' and 'position' makes them mutually exclusive. Hence why you need two values to represent them (usually a rotation and a vector).

      The molecules that make up the object have moved to a new position.

      So now you've moved beyond arguing ad nauseum to ad absurdum? You're trying to move the goalposts, so to speak. An object's position is not defined based on the positions of its molecules, especially since--except at absolute zero--those molecules are ALWAYS in motion. Hence an object would always be moving in your definition, making this entire argument even more ridiculous than it has already become.

      As (an even more absurd) counter-argument I could offer up that molecules themselves are just convenient projections of vibrations of the string that make up reality and therefore any perceived motion is itself an illusion, since it simply represents a change in the vibrational frequency of some string and not any real motion in 3-space. But I don't think that's necessary. I think you've proven you've got nothing to rely upon but yourself, and based on the examples I've seen today you using an argument from authority is laughable.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    6. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Oh, I should add that I think you have some fundamental logic/semantic problems going on.

      That's an interesting statement considering the arguments I've seen from you.

      Rocking is a type of motion.

      But the boat is not moving from the point of view of a true six degree of freedom motion tracker. It's rotating. If you're placed on the surface of the boat, however, you are moving as you'll be alternately lifted and lowered by the motion of the boat. Though from the point of view of the boat, you're not moving.

      Would you say that someone who is running is not moving?

      If they're running then their position is changing, meaning a tracker would show linear motion. If they're running in place, though, the tracker would show no change in position.

      Pretty basic stuff, which you don't seem to grasp. I think they cover this at a pretty young age in school.

      Ad hominem now?

      So, back to "orientation" versus "position." Orientation is a subset of position. It is a type of position. So no, talking about changes in orientation does not preclude changes in position - because when you talk about orientation, you are talking about a type of position.

      Not at all. Orientation is completely independent of position. I can freely change an object's position without modifying it's orientation and vice versa. Hence my earlier comments about 4x4 homogeneous transforms and quaternion/position pairs.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    7. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Any regularly accepted definition of 'orientation' and 'position' makes them mutually exclusive.

      How so? Would you care to link to such a definition?

      Hence why you need two values to represent them (usually a rotation and a vector).

      Having two values to represent two different types of position does not make them mutually exclusive.

      So now you've moved beyond arguing ad nauseum to ad absurdum? You're trying to move the goalposts, so to speak. An object's position is not defined based on the positions of its molecules, especially since--except at absolute zero--those molecules are ALWAYS in motion.

      No, you're the one going into absurdity. I'm the one sticking with the real world. An object is made up of molecules. We use "object" as a convenient way to describe that grouping of molecules. So, when it comes down to it, the position of those molecules defines the position of the object.

      But let's back up a bit. How do you rotate something? You move it. How can you rotate it without moving it?

      I think you've proven you've got nothing to rely upon but yourself, and based on the examples I've seen today you using an argument from authority is laughable.

      Gosh, I'm so humbled. But you are the one making arguments from authority like "my friends are PhD physicists." I never invoked authority. Just looked at physical reality and the dictionary - not some construct you are creating through reference to 3D graphics and your friends being computer scientists.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But the boat is not moving from the point of view of a true six degree of freedom motion tracker. It's rotating.

      But rotation is a type of movement - and a six axis motion tracker would detect that motion, and report it as such.

      By your logic, the propellor on an airplane is not moving when the engine is running, because it is rotating. But just about everybody, from a three-year-old child to a PhD physicist would say that the propellor blades are moving - because they are. They are moving in a circle around the hub/shaft.

      I can freely change an object's position without modifying it's orientation and vice versa.

      You can change an object's position without changing its orientation, but you cannot change its orientation without changing its position. By position, I mean its physical position. You can abstract the two concepts to simplify thinking - or implement them in a 3D engine. But you are still changing the absolute position of an object when you rotate it.

      You are simply referring to a reference point (usually center of gravity) when you say that rotation doesn't cause movement. That's a useful reference point for many purposes, but it is "artificial," so to speak. An object is more than just a reference point. The rest of the object moves when it rotates.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Shados · · Score: 1

      if I was you, I'd give up. This guy is basically arguing "OMG! What a troll! They dared say something was getting colder, when ANYONE with a brain would know that it is not getting colder, it is dissipating heat!" (note: I am not a physicist, so I'm sure the terminology isn't correct, but you get the idea).

      The fact that he labeled the original poster as a most likely troll, stating that it was obvious the Wii only had 1 feature over the PS3's controler (the ability to triangulate position), as opposed to two (the ability to detect movement AND triangulate 3d position) using semantic (since rotation is a movement, the PS3 has it too, thus clearly, the Wii only has 1 extra feature!) when it is obvious it has 2 (the acceleromethers aren't there for show), just show that he's in his own bubble world.

      So wether he is correct or not, is quite irrelevent to the original subject. So you should let him argue alone, as everyone -else- understood the original poster anyway (thus why its his posts that got moderated troll, not yours, nor the original post)

    10. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it is obvious it has 2 (the acceleromethers aren't there for show)

      *sigh*, you know you could do very basic research and find that BOTH wiimote and Sixaxis use accelerometers, not just Wiimote. The original poster is just downright wrong.

    11. Re:Cuiusvis hominis est errare... by Shados · · Score: 1
      *sigh*, you know you could do very basic research and find that BOTH wiimote and Sixaxis use accelerometers, not just Wiimote. The original poster is just downright wrong.
      You are correct. I did do research. The problem, and whats misleading when critically reading the available information, is that most of Sony's own announcements are too sensationalists to see exactly whats truth and whats bent fluff. Also, I had seen an opened up Sixaxis, and only saw the gyro. It happens that the Sixasix also has one of the (currently) smallest 3 axis accelerometers on the market hidden in a corner. Learn something new everyday.

      Thank you for the correction. Though the argument of Mr. Troll were all made in the "rotation = movement, thus sixaxis = wiimote minus pointer", leading me to beleive he did not realise this either.
  61. From what i saw over the weekend by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

    I actually saw a few PS3's in stores last weekend (20 gig units) that people didn't seem to eager to buy (one was in target for at least 6 hours). On the other hand i have yet to see a wii in a store.

    I thought about getting the ps3 but it felt silly to get it for just one game i'm sure i'll get one next year

  62. Generally true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unlike most other forms of entertainment (going out, going and renting a movie etc), consoles provide entertainment RIGHT NOW.

    Unless ur playing on the PSP that is...where load times rival the time it takes for your grandma to get to her walker.
  63. Correct me if I'm wrong by glwtta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't that imply that exactly as many people are trading their Wiis for PS3s?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      AND they even give them money!

      ..

      Seriously, the WII fanboyism must stop! Sometimes you guys sound as a religious sect. Sure it is cool and all but it is not the best invention after the wheel. It does have a new controller, but, IF the PS3 failed entirely sony would just have to make a new controller o_O sounds awesome doesn't it? Controllers are replaceable! and if the expensive price really hurts them they can just remove blueray technology. If the lack of games is a problem they just release new games

      None of them console companies care that much about this country so there was none of the new consoles available for this christmas.

      But I think I would get a wii, but I have my doubts, it is just that console games are always too expensive in comparission to the PC games that are just 'free', on this matter the xbox 360 sounded promising but then you figure out you need a subscription in order to make the games and you can't distribute your own games, which kind of kills the whole great idea XNA was.

      The good thing about the wii is the cost , even I am able to pay those 160, but it is probably going to become much more expensive when it arrives here.

      Here, the PS is still pretty successful and everyone migrates to PS2 whenever they can, no xbox or gamecube are known that much here. I once saw a gamecube in an store as opposed to the many boxes of PS1 and the 3 boxes of PS2

      Because of that when people here hear about the PS3, the wii and the xbox360 they look forward to having a PS3, of course they would just wait 8 years before the PS3 gets accessible for them (just like what happened to the PS2)

      I just think it is too soon to make conclussions I wouldn't really predict failure or complete success of

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  64. No Wii price drop. by Shrubber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now I'll wait until the strongly rumored January price drop and their appearance in stores.

    There is no strongly rumored January price drop, there isn't even a weakly rumored January price drop. There is only a, "one guy said on Slashdot that he thinks there will be a January" price drop.

    There will be no price drop. There is no reason for a price drop. Demand still outweighs supply, why on Earth would anyone even consider a price drop?

  65. Potential by Shrubber · · Score: 1

    - The potential of the cell processor architecture is significant. Potential means, "hasn't done anything yet." I have no doubt that the PS3 will be a very competitive force in the marketplace, but it doesn't get handed anything until it proves it. So far all Sony has proven with the PS3 is that a high price and low supply do not create great selling points. Until the substance is there, which is the games, the PS3 doesn't have anything going for it but hope for the future. That's a lot of money to hang on the idea that some day you'll get good games to play. If there were full PS2 compatibility that would at least be something, but I for one couldn't even buy a PS3 today and play some of the PS2 games that I have that I *do* actually still play.
  66. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best pants-shitting post ever.

  67. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God sir, that was legendary. I'm laughing so hard I'm crying and my co-workers probably think I'm drunk. Three cheers for the master of the poop story.

  68. Sorry guys by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    I don't wanna burst your bubble but.. for every guy swapping his PS3 for a Wii, there has to be one swapping his Wii for a PS3

    1. Re:Sorry guys by triptogn · · Score: 1

      Man, did you nail it on the head.

  69. Funny phone argument. by GodInHell · · Score: 1

    So I called Circuit City from the parking lot the other day. One of the floor reps had just given me that "I don't have any in stock... right now and I certaintainly haven't seen any in back but if you want a wii, try calling the switchbaord."

    So I did. The poor operator (I think they may have been screwing with her) was really frazzled. I said I was calling about the Wii, and she said really sharply "We don't have any", will you have some soon? "I can't say." If I wanted to get one, is there a special key word? "No, we don't have any! No Wii's!!" Okay... well.. what about the PS3? >pause
    Hmm?

    They got 10 in, I was number 14 on the list.. bleh.

    -GiH

  70. I call BS. by SupaYoda · · Score: 1

    1. I've noticed that the stores haven't had much of a problem selling their systems. Those having problems selling the systems have already purchased them and are trying to RESELL them online for a higher price. (READ: People aren't willing to pay $2K/system anymore.) Fact is that nearly every retailer (if not all) is sold out of the product, meaning that Sony has already made 100% of their profits from the sales. Selling 100% of your output is not considered a failure.

    2. Those wishing to resell their systems and are unsuccessful merely need to keep their receipt and return the product to the store within 30 days for a full refund. I've watched some of the local stores very closely just out of curiosity, and there has only been a total of 1 return since launch. The system was immediately sold to a very grateful gentleman who had a preorder. Even the employees weren't able to get their hands on a system.

    3. If a person buys an expensive product without first checking out the product and the competition, he deserves what he gets. With so many display units available to try in stores, there's no way that the person doing the buying wouldn't know what he was getting.

    4. Thanks to frequent shipments, the Wii is not hard to find if you want one badly enough. I saw two in a Wal-Mart display case last week. Considering that the Christmas rush is now over, one only has to wait until the next shipment. I doubt seriously that someone is deperate enough to get their hands on a Wii that they would take such a hit.

    If such a person exists who would do what the article is suggesting that they are doing, that person is the reason why my can of peanuts has a warning label reading, "Contains nuts."

    I realize that I'm not conforming to the usual Sony-bashing that has become so popular on Slashdot, but I'm not seeing much of the doomsday for Sony that's being predicted here. I'll probably pay in karma. I admit that the PS3 is overpriced and that it neglects the main purpose of the product in an effort to produce an entertainment system instead of a gaming system. I will probably get a Wii sooner because of the price alone. But I won't be purchasing either system at least until after the first markdown, and I will most likely buy a used system. I just don't have a good enough reason to buy a system or game at launch. I can wait. But I'll probably buy a PS3 in addition to my Wii because I like the games from the PS1 and the PS2, and I will probably like the games that come out for the PS3. Better yet, I don't have to pay a second time to play those PS1 & PS2 games on the PS3, unlike the Wii, where I have to pay again to play those nostalgic favorites that I bought for the NES when I was much younger.

    1. Re:I call BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. I have been to a lot of stores where ps3s are on the shelves where wiis are completely sold. IN fact you can't walk into a single store here that has a wii. and sony is taking a loss on each console sold, so they aren't making any profit on the sales of ps3s if your statement were even remotely true.

      2. That may be your local stores, but until there is proof, I call bs on this statement.

      3. I agree

      4. While yes they may start to become easier to find (obviously), I know more than a few people who have had lots of trouble picking one up, including people still camping for them in the days leading to chrismas.

    2. Re:I call BS. by SupaYoda · · Score: 1

      Apparently, people are having a hard enough time trying to find them that they are still willing to pay anywhere from $50-200 extra plus shipping for a system on ebay. So if you know of a store that is still selling them, you may want to let some people know. I could just as easily call bs on your statement as you have on mine. When I say "profit," I'm referring to the expected revenues for the systems that were shipped. Honestly, I have no idea as to what the cost to manufacture per unit was for Sony, so I can't say for sure whether or not they are taking a hit on each console. I can, however, tell you that it is likely that Microsoft and Nintendo would be doing the same if that is the case. But I apologize for my technical error in choice of wording.

      While people might be camping out for the Wii, they haven't exactly had the opportunity to do so with the PS3, since there haven't been as many shipments, so it's very hard to compare the sales for the two based on how many lines of campers the consoles had in the days leading up to Christmas.

    3. Re:I call BS. by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      I'm thankful that I haven't played Zelda since the N64 so the graphics seem nicely bumped - but they in NO WAY showcase the system. I'm hoping for the developers to get on track but some of the ports are looking WORSE than N64 titles (according to wii.ign.com). I know it's not a graphic powerhouse, but come-the-fuck-on.

    4. Re:I call BS. by spwolfx · · Score: 1

      It took futureshop.ca 6 hours to sell 1,000 PS3's yesterday.... 6 hours! Thats terrible failure, Sony is going to call it quits, because there will be one kid that saw 999 left, and will not write an article on his blog, on how PS3's are not selling, and how he chuckled and passed on when he could have purchased one. Mainstream media will pick it up and PS3 will die away in pains... ... or not? PS3 already had more revenues in Japan in last week of sales, than Wii, major failure for more available Wii at their home market.

      Reason people saw PS3's at stores, is that Sony managed to ship more PS3's in one day of last week, than in complete November, according to Best Buy, and they continue to ship them.

      People think sold out is cool, however it is major failure for any manufacturer of any, but highly niche goods. No availability means no sales, so as soon as Sony can stock 20 PS3's at shelves of every electronics store in the USA, sooner PS3 will be sucess, despite uneducated bloggers who have no clue on how industry works.

      Same goes for Wii, which has weird shortages for an system that is basically an old technology, has no exotic components and is not even feature complete yet (no online support in any of current games). Fact that Nintendo tries to maximize profits and isnt shipping them via air, in smaller quantities, doesnt help either. I very much doubt that Nintendo likes their shortages either, despite media thinking it is cool.

    5. Re:I call BS. by SupaYoda · · Score: 1

      Interesting take. I'm not surprised that it would take futureshop.ca over 6 hours to sell out, but that's 1000 PS3's, too. I don't think people are really shopping as hard for either system, right now. But your major retailers and game stores (like EB and GameStop) can't seem to keep them on their shelves, and your average EU is going to shop the "series of tubes" at amazon and the online component of their favorite retailer. Most people I know haven't even heard of tigerdirect or newegg. Had it been one of those that took 6 hours to sell 1000 PS3's, it would have definitely picked up.

      You're absolutely right on the sold out bit, too. I hadn't thought of that. When your product isn't available, someone might instead consider buying the more available competition.

      I'd also forgotten the shipment from last week. When I picked up my preordered PS3 (resold for baby girl's college fund), GameStop offered me an "incentive" to give up my system until the next shipment, which was supposed to be sometime before Christmas. They didn't know exactly when it was coming in, though, so I turned them down. I never heard anything else about that other shipment coming in from MSM news, although I did hear a great deal about the Wii shipments.

    6. Re:I call BS. by SupaYoda · · Score: 1

      LOL! Zelda is one of my all-time favorites from my kiddy days! I've been a fan since the first game came out, and it's the main reason why I continue to buy Nintendo consoles, and I am the proud owner of a brand new copy of Twilight Princess for GameCube. (I was absolutely thrilled to find that I'd be able to download and play all of the older games on the Wii.) Mario is another favorite. Baton Kaitos was a fun addition to the GameCube library. I'm mainly a RPG junkie, though, so I end up buying more games for my PS2 than my GameCube. Thing is, hubby bought me Twilight Princess AND FFXII for Christmas, and I'm definitely playing FFXII first, so it may be a while until I get to Twilight Princess. Seeing as how more and more time is spent caring for a baby, and I have less and less time for gaming, it will take even longer.

  71. Silly Speculation by ppp · · Score: 1

    I don't see how anyone can draw any conclusions about the Console Wars at this point in time. We'll all know a lot more in a year or so when the new systems have more extensive software libraries available. As much as Sony deserves bashing, the PS3 will probably look a lot better when it's *Killer Apps* are avaiable - same for the Wii. And the 360 has Halo 3 coming. Just like in the past, this thing will be won by the system with the best gaming lineup. And it's a bit premature to conclude who that will be right now.

  72. Brilliant viral marketing ploy? by l00sr · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying it's likely this happened, but wouldn't this make the most brilliant viral marketing ploy? Nintendo hires willing shills across the country, providing each with a pre-bought PS3, with instructions to publicly sell said units for Wiis. Everybody wins... except Sony. Bravo, Nintendo :)

  73. Agreed by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

    Yes, to be fair, the "GigaGamez" site the original article comes from is a little bit Wii-biased. Not a lot, but at a minimum their least favorite system is the PS3 if you just pass over the past few months' articles. They seem to have some love for the Xbox 360 though.

    So... it is newsworthy that anyone would trade a hard-won PS3 for a Wii if you think only of effort and cost - I'll give you that - but the article is exaggerating a little.

  74. Can't write but gets a review console ??? by Lexor · · Score: 0

    ... people want the Wii because the PS3s best game is Resistance: Fall of Man. This, of course, forget that there are plenty of cool PS3 games on the way ...

    How does this guy get a free review console when it seems he has a problem writing ?

    --
    Regards, Lex
  75. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Nice repost of email spam - you may now fuck off, and I hope your dog dies hillbilly cocksucker. Enjoy your next Nascar event.

  76. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you by any chance a regular visitor of /b/ ?

  77. I'd just like to say by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    If anyone out there would like to trade me a fully functional 60GB PS3 for a Wii, please reply to this post and I will gladly make arrangements. Multiple trades welcome.

    Also if anyone wants to trade in their worn-out one hundred dollar bills for a matching quantity of crisp singles, or if anyone has lost their keys and would like to give me their home and/or car, I can make arrangements for that as well. Also if anyone would like to purchase some fresh air...

  78. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    So what are you saying?

  79. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got it all wrong -- that episode was from what your daughter has been doing to HIM.

    At least she's happy.

  80. Pretty obvious. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You were "foed" because you consider normal to queue in the cold to reserve a gaming console.

    No disrispect, but I asume the guy that foed you only befriends functional adults that can wait to buy something when it is available via the normal channels and that consider such unnecessary artificial shortages an insult to costumres.

    But I am guessing here only.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  81. You think you are clever. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    But you are being espectacularly dumb.

    Just check how long dinosaurs ruled the planet and how long mammals have being around, specially hominids, and if you want to be really humbled, check how long homo sapiens has been around.

    When mammals and we humans get anywhere close to what dinosaurs got on this planet, then we may start the jibes, before that we should be fearful that we may not do as well as such magnificent beasts did.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  82. Once this, potential that, blah ,blah, blah by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    So you are just saying the PS3 isn't there yet?

    Thanks for making that awfully clear.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  83. Re:I think my GFs parents were going to give us a by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Curse you for making me crack up laughing at work!

  84. Fanboiese hurts brain! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "There's also speculation that people want the Wii because the PS3s best game is Resistance: Fall of Man. This, of course, forget that there are plenty of cool PS3 games on the way,"

    If "plenty of cool PS3 games" are coming later, wouldn't it make more sense to buy the PS3 later? The (crazy) people who got themselves a PS3 this Christmas wanted instant gratification, or else they wouldn't have spent all that money on eBay to begin with. They're not going to take kindly to waiting for things that are "on the way."

    "and the PS3 has its own motion sensing technology, which, while not as good as the Wii, is still pretty cool and opens up Sony to emulate some of the Wii's successes.'"

    SIXAXIS: almost as good for twice the price!

  85. Sony Fanboi by Gnostic+Ronin · · Score: 1
    Honestly, do you READ? There are numerous stories out there of ps3 being available for 6-7 hours in a store -- nobody wants them. Compare that to Wiis, where people are calling multiple stores to find them. Compare on just about any demand curve, and ps3 LOSES HORRIBLY. The price is too high, there are no games worth buying, and the controller is an obvious Wii knockoff.

    Now addressing each of your points:

    1.) Selling out of product when you're DELIBERATELY RESTRICTING SUPPLY is not demand either. Wii is already well on its way to 1 million units. ps3 still hasn't sold 400,000 units (and most "sales" were eBay scalpers, not people who wanted to PLAY with the ps3).

    2. The numbers say otherwise. Most ps3s are either returned, unopened, or traded for Wiis. The facts say that ps3s are easier to get. Sorry, but watching the Sony store doesn't count as research.

    3. Actually, you (and Sony) better pray they don't try the Demo Boxes in the stores -- they freeze up. I've yet to see an unfrozen ps3 demo display.

    4. Once again, it comes down to Sony restricting supply, not actual demand. Sony made 400,000 units, and they sell out immediately. Wii has about a million units, and you can find a few here and there. You do the math.

    But when ps3 goes Dreamcast on ya, you can talk about its obvious superiority.

  86. i wish you had balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i could kick them
    but i guess we're both out of luck

  87. Reality Check by Gnostic+Ronin · · Score: 1
    Yeah, 6 hours to sell 1000.

    Fine, but consider the fact that this is with LESS than a million consoles sold, and within a month and a half of launch. It isn't just having consoles on the self that has people thinking that Sony is going to lose massively. It's the people who can't tell the difference between 360 and ps3 (85% of us without hidef), and scores of others who've been impressed with the Wii and can barely manage a "meh" for the ps3. Maybe because most manufacturers aren't planing ps3 exclusives anymore. Maybe it was the fact that Square Enix is so disappointed in ps3 sales that they'd rather release Dragon Quest on the NDS than the ps3.

    I challenge the ps3 fanbois to show me one place where ps3 is leading the competition (assuming that, as is true for most people, the consumer doesn't have a hidef tv). Games? Xbox has a whole library of next gen games. Control? Wii has sixaxis kicked to the curb. Price? ps3 $600. Xbox360 $300, Wii $250. Then there's the complete waste of airtime ads -- maybe it would help if people saw the actual graphics instead of the self-solving rubix cube and crying babydoll? Honestly, the fact that they're still selling out baffles me -- there can't be that many rich retarded people out there.