Slashdot Mirror


Consumer Vista Upgrades Moving at Snail's Pace

Chester Freeze writes "During the holiday season, many shoppers bought PCs with the promise of quick, free Vista upgrades. The reality has been something else entirely: many Dell and HP customers are being told that they won't receive their copies of Vista before April. 'One source at a major OEM who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the real issue is that OEMs are still not sure which PCs are really ready to support Vista, and which PCs aren't... Customers who qualify for an Express Upgrade also qualify for OEM support for Windows Vista, even if their machines came with Windows XP. The last thing a Dell, Gateway, or HP wants to do is start sending out upgrades to customers who might have video cards that do not have particularly stable drivers yet (or sound cards, or RAID controllers, etc.). This could be a support disaster.'"

269 comments

  1. really? by President_Camacho · · Score: 4, Funny

    The last thing a Dell, Gateway, or HP wants to do is start sending out upgrades to customers who might have video cards that do not have particularly stable drivers yet

    They haven't had qualms about that in the past. What's stopping them now?

    1. Re:really? by Valdez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they learned from their mistakes? Give them a small bit of credit, at least.

    2. Re:really? by Kelbear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dell actually recommends the exact upgrades "for an optimal Vista experience". So if you're using the exact configuration that they recommended for Vista(they even set aside a page listing out which upgrade areas where you lack the recommended parts), how is it that they still can't be sure that my laptop is ready for Vista?

      They also keep a support sticker on the bottom so they know exactly what hardware is inside when they look up the support sticker. They also require that support sticker when registering for the vista upgrade.

      I don't think Dell's problem is that they don't know who would be ready to get the upgrade. I just think they had no plan at all for processing all the discs they promised to send out.

    3. Re:really? by baggins2001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No kiddiing, especially with Dell, we needed computers with XP because our Apps are supported on XP and our users are trained on Office 2003. We expressly told them we wanted XP and not Vista and not Office 2007.
      The quote even specified it.
      The computers show up and they have Vista and Office 2007. We have to spend > 3 hours getting it arranged for them to come pick up the computers.

      --
      He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
    4. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dell probably isn't confused about what hardware is on which computer they sell.
      That's what they DO know.

      They don't know which piece of hardware Vista is going to cause to smoke and explode.
      Remember linux drivers in 1998? This is worse... it's proprietary. And delayed.

      Even if hardware is supposedly "supported" by vista doesn't mean it will work.
      It just means it's supposed to. (Eventually)

      Meanwhile, on planet Dell, the phones begin to ring nonstop for 5 years.
      And 100,000 new customers choke on their tongues swollen from screaming.

    5. Re:really? by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      Because we all know that consumers in general buy sound cards (and not just rely on on-board) and pretty sure every consumer out there gets a RAID card or two on their box. Yay for summaries?

    6. Re:really? by lukas84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lenovo is doing these things A LOT better.

      I had Vista running on my old R51, which died a few weeks ago. I got a new T60 - that was around 3.2.07, and Lenovo already had all the drivers out. Ultranav, Rescue and Recovery, Mobile Center Extensions, Fingerprint Reader, Wireless, Bluetooth, Hard Disk Protection.

      All working flawlessly. I still haven't got my Lenovo Vista CD with Express Upgrade, so i've got this machine running with a normal VLP License.

      Quite nice of Lenovo to support all the hardware at release time. The PC's are less of a problem - they don't have as much fancy stuff as a notebook.

    7. Re:really? by koh · · Score: 1, Funny

      I had Vista running on my old R51, which died a few weeks ago.

      Priceless. Thank you.

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    8. Re:really? by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because machines running XP or Linux never die :)

    9. Re:really? by drooling-dog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      how is it that they still can't be sure that my laptop is ready for Vista? Shouldn't that read, "how is it that they still can't be sure that Vista is ready for my laptop?

      After all, that's what MS partisans say about Linux when it lacks driver support for something...
    10. Re:really? by zcsteele · · Score: 1

      Nah, they just become zombie processors.

      --
      ...brand new, all over again.
    11. Re:really? by KKlaus · · Score: 1

      I think you're right that they do know, but you're wrong about your conclusion. I mean come on, I think dell can handle mailing a bunch of disks. I'm pretty sure they don't move _that_ many computers without having some logistic skill. Anyhow, I think this is a carefully worded lie. They just don't want to come out and say they know the drivers aren't up to par, because that would embarrass people they use and depend on. So they can't mail the disks, because they are fully aware that users will have a substandard experience that will reflect badly on them, but its easier to say they "don't know" then to say yeah, there are problems, some of these are bad.

      --
      Relax I just want some peanuts.
    12. Re:really? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I got an E1705, and the service tag didn't work on the dell vista site. Bah, it was ordered well after the October time range. A chat guy said that it would be added to the database in 3-5 days... And, the site was down on 1/30 (Vista's release). The whole thing has seemed sloppy to me...

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    13. Re:really? by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      You don't have a sound card in your computer? The difference between on-board sound and an expansion card is only semantic. Either way, you need drivers. RAID controllers are probably on-board as well in many machines.

    14. Re:really? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I've run into a similar situation when ordering a new laptop for one of my clients. According to our Dell sale rep, we can only get XP installed on a Precision. Unfortunately, all Latitudes and Inspirons come with Vista only.

      Being that our time costs money, formatting and reinstalling XP on new laptop could not be justified based on our hourly rate of labor. In the end, the client agreed that paying for a Precision laptop installed with XP from factory was the most cost effective solution.

      Vista may be "ok" for home users, but definitely not for the corporate world. Businesses want a computer that will work for them, and around their IT infrastructure. They certainly don't want a computer with an OS fighting them at every turn with new and incompatible features. Plus, having to re-learn an OS and its application is time consuming. Obviously, spending time on something that's not profitable doesn't fly too well in our corporate society.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    15. Re:really? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I mean come on, I think dell can handle mailing a bunch of disks.

      ...and welcome back to Tales From The Shop.

      A client has had a laptop in since late last month, an Inspiron 1100. After trying an after-market restore disk vendor [no dice, bunk disk images.], we tried to order 'em from Dell. After the obligatory on-hold wait, I explained that I needed to order the disks. They asked for the original order number. I told 'em I didn't have that, and instead gave them the client's name and address. I'm told they can't order the disks, as our client's name doesn't match the name THEY'VE got. After a few good solid head-thunks on the table, I asked if they'd call the client directly to verify the order information. They said they would, and hung up. Two days later, I check back with the client to see if they've called them. Nothing. At this point, I feel the best thing is for the client to call them and ask for them; it'll be harder for Dell to tell the client that it's not their computer. I follow up again in three days and the client says they've been ordered, even having them shipped to us.
      This was 2 weeks ago. We're still waiting on the disks. While I might tentatively applaud Dell for sending them by muleback with environmental concerns in mind, our client really just wanted their laptop back sooner...

      IMHO, when shipping 1 set of restore disks Dell couldn't find its collective rear with a map, both hands, GPS, a Sherpa guide, a copy of Gray's anatomy, and a licensed proctologist.
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    16. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looking at my dell laptop (inspiron 8600) i have to say that the
      newest gfx driver is from 2004 for windows (you can get the
      omega drivers though - hacked together, only supporting 16bit,
      which use more up to date components from the original ati
      driver)

      and its from 2007 for linux

      so which os is better supported? (all other components have
      well working drivers on both os's, i havent booted into windows
      for more than half a year now, and it was for some game i dont
      even remember)

      the gfx card is a beautiful working radeon mobility 9600pro

      i dont care a shit about how vista would runs on any hardware anyways,
      so i am a bit OT here :P

    17. Re:really? by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      I'm relieved to hear from a customer that Lenovo is still doing a good job supporting their ThinkPads since they acquired IBM's PC division. I still favor ThinkPads and ThinkCentre desktops over uber-cheap HP and Dell PCs because of their good reputation for service and support. Besides, the ThinkPad R series and ThinkCentre A series offer reasonably priced options, even if they aren't "pretty" or made for the home.

      I'm very curious about the quality of Lenovo's service/support for their cheaper 3000 series notebooks and desktops, which are not ThinkPad/ThinkCentre models and were released by Lenovo after they acquired IBM's PC division. Their desktop computers page says the 3000 series is "Backed by IBM service and support" (just like ThinkCentre), but I have doubts about Lenovo providing the same level of support for such a low price.

      Anyhoo, thanks for your current ThinkPad anecdotes.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    18. Re:really? by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      I've run into a similar situation when ordering a new laptop for one of my clients. According to our Dell sale rep, we can only get XP installed on a Precision. Unfortunately, all Latitudes and Inspirons come with Vista only. I found that so hard to believe (no XP for Latitudes?) that I checked Dell's Small Business notebooks page. Latitudes (Dell's "real" non-workstation business notebooks) can definately get Windows XP preinstalled instead of Vista. It seems your Dell sales rep was either incorrect or misunderstood. It would be nonsensical NOT to include an XP option for their Latitude line for the good reasons you stated in the rest of your comment.

      I'm not surprised Inspiron notebooks (even in the Small Business section) do not offer XP as an option because I never considered Inspirons to be "real" business notebooks. Their features and prices are more oriented toward home users.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    19. Re:really? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Lenovo released Vista drivers for Thinkpads this January, just in time for the release. In fact, my R51e now runs Vista with all hardware properly supported.

    20. Re:really? by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      I can't talk about the service in the US, but here in switzerland the service for their PCs was handled by a local company, called "ESAG Services" since quite some time.

      When Lenovo bought IBM, this didn't change. And the service is still quite good. We have a few 3000 series notebooks, and the quality is okay. They're a long way from a thinkpad, but that's the price difference right there.

      We've had a issue with one of these devices, the V100 subnotebook. Bluetooth stopped working one day, and the Bluetooth module just wasn't visible in the device manager anymore - i bootet the machine to Linux, where the USB Bluetooth device wasn't visible either. I called them up, told tham what i saw. Sent in the machine to the specified address, and got it back three days later, with everything working fine.

    21. Re:really? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link. :)

      I was aware of the Latitudes being geared toward the business sector, but I couldn't find one without XP. Thankfully, I stand corrected.

      I'm curious to know if there is a commission difference between selling products with XP vs. Vista. I doubt he misunderstood me.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  2. I can't possibly understand why... by zdc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... you give up an OS riddled with security holes, poor interface design, and ridiculous resource requirements for another OS riddled with security holes, poor interface design, and even more ridiculous resource requirements... except it costs a few hundred (potentially) more.

    1. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by Ramble · · Score: 0

      Ok Mr. Human Interface Designer give us a better example. And why not show me some of these huge security holes while you're at it.

      --
      "Oh boy"
    2. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know why people will give it up... DRM, or more specifically the hoops you have to jump through to install Vista. Many people are trying to not pay the license fee now, and Vista will only push them farther toward trying Linux. Hey, the price is right, and it does all that they want to do anyway, so now is the time to drop MS products.

      Sure, businesses will still find the money and time to upgrade, but most of them will do a forklift upgrade with a business maintenance plan on the desktop machines. This is a luxury that home pc owners do not have. The only real choice is to switch or suffer the pains of upgrades, license fees, support issues, software headaches, and the continued use of an OS that is the malware hackers preferred target.

      This isn't trolling or Linux fanboi-ism, just an observation of what I'm seeing in the general populace.

    3. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .show me some of these huge security holes while you're at it.

      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsv ista/buyorupgrade/genuine/default.mspx

      KFG

    4. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by allscan · · Score: 1

      "If you do not to activate Windows Vista within the 30-day grace period, your system will switch to a reduced functionality mode. In this mode, only the default Internet browser will be available to use and you will automatically be logged-out every hour. While operating in a reduced functionality mode, you will be able to access personal files, but many functions will be restricted." Holy crap Batman. Exactly why XP will live on forever, at least you can still use an unactivated version.

    5. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Stardock's been doing this for years - and with much much much lower hardware requirements that Vista's Aero requires. http://www.stardock.com/products/odnt/

    6. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by Anpheus · · Score: 1
      You can extend the grace period by going into the command prompt and typing:

      slmgr -rearm
      Source: Coding Horror
    7. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by westlake · · Score: 1
      Hey, the price is right, and it does all that they want to do anyway, so now is the time to drop MS products.

      Take a stroll through Linspire's CNR warehouse. Then scan the list of software bestsellers at Amazon.com.

      Tell me again that Linux does everything the home user wants. Tell me again how much he hates Microsoft. Tell me again why Linux deserves better than a 1% market share.

    8. Re:I can't possibly understand why... by adolf · · Score: 1

      I earn a big portion of my income supporting desktop Windows machines in random places, so I went ahead and jumped onto Vista with my daily-use laptop computer so that I'd know what to expect.

      The Vista upgrade went fine.

      The DRM you speak of, I'm not too sure about. It seems to me that some combination of mplayer / mencoder / VLC / Azureus / piratebay will handily defeat any and all obnoxious DRM schemes, even on Vista.

  3. COULD BE a support disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the other hand, it could be easy to mitigate for Dell..

    Refund the money. Now. Be the first to say Vista is crap
    and you won't support it until SP1, just like the rest of us.

    Or, dive into the steaming shithole. Your choice.

    1. Re:COULD BE a support disaster? by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      EXCELLENT idea! If they were pro-active and started giving refunds to people for the "vista upgrade option" they purchases, it would make Dell the hero instead of them being caught in the huge nasty class action suit I see looming on the horizon if things continue in the vein they are...

    2. Re:COULD BE a support disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not only does it make them the hero, it makes a LOT of business sense.
      How much did the upgrade cost? Refunding that cost per user is cheaper.

      Consider what they will spend on call centers, refunds, lawyers, engineers...
      this is only going to get WORSE for the next 2-3 years, depending on how fast
      MS gets their act together, and we all know what that means.

      In the end it's Dell's image that suffers... their main product is noob support.
      If they can't even manage to get a working OS on their new boxes, who wants it?
      Corporate clients? Nope. Home users? Nope. Gamers? Nope.

      I just hope XP support and patches don't fall by the wayside because of this idiocy.
      It's the only version that's even REMOTELY a viable option right now, flaws and all.

    3. Re:Could be a support disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gateway, huh...

    4. Re:COULD BE a support disaster? by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      ....

      They didn't charge anything for it. It was a free coupon, no charges attached.

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    5. Re:COULD BE a support disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro$oft and these PC mills know that there is a sucker born every minute.

      Sucker!!!!

  4. Dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used up all my good Vista jokes on the last article! :-(

    1. Re:Dammit! by littlem · · Score: 1

      Most people round here don't let considerations like that put them off!

    2. Re:Dammit! by westlake · · Score: 1
      I used up all my good Vista jokes on the last article! :-(

      jokes which will be replayed endlessly even as Vista gains significant market share. jokes which will become ever more strident as Vista gains market share.

    3. Re:Dammit! by master_p · · Score: 1

      but...but...Vista jokes are unlimited...

  5. they sold it. by colinbg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    well, they sold it. Sort of comes with the territory. I know if I sold a promise to upgrade and received payment for it, I am pretty sure I am obligated to provide it! Sort by law I believe, although IANAL, so I could be wrong.

    --
    Clever or not, I got nothing...
    1. Re:they sold it. by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      While I'm not defending any of these OEM's or Microsoft (this is a typical big screw up for them), if you buy a computer and believe any claims that come out of Dell, HP, whomever, you are dumb. Companies lie. Plain and simple. If you don't think so then I've got some tobacco to sell you. Anyone who actually believed they were going to get a quick seamless upgrade is out of their mind. If you buy an off the shelf PC today at the store with Vista you are crazy to believe it's going to work all that great. Marketing drones like to create a huge hype for the launch of a product but in reality most products with big launches aren't what was promised and the promises come months or years later (if those promises are fufilled). Don't hold out on your 200 dollar mail in rebate coming back soon either.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    2. Re:they sold it. by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know if I sold a promise to upgrade and received payment for it, I am pretty sure I am obligated to provide it!
      Lawyer: calm down, we have granted you an OEM upgrade licence to Vista, just as we promised.
      You: So where is it?
      Lawyer: It doesn't have a location, it's a license.
      You: So what does that mean?
      Lawer: It means we fulfilled our legal obligation. Good day.
    3. Re:they sold it. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If you buy an off the shelf PC today at the store with Vista you are crazy to believe it's going to work all that great.


      I found this out the hard way. The system I bought should be in the upper tier of systems that should run Vista well. It's got the big sticker to prove it.

      The good news is that when I backgraded to XP Pro SP2, the machine just hums. The core2duo lets me run Sonar in 64-bit mode and I get better performance from my activex plug-ins and software synthesizers than ever before. When my old system died I had no choice but to buy a new one and not having the time to build a box myself I bought something as close to my desired specs as possible. Only problem was, it only came with Vista Home Premium. I've described my horrible experience several times before, but suffice it to say that it finally came down to using XP or not finishing my project. I'm really happy with XP. I worked a few days ago on a Mac Pro with similar software and I've got to say my "Vista-ready" system running XP Pro, tweaked the way I like it, compares favorably in terms of performance and "getting the job done".

      Maybe the solution is not paying attention to the what Microsoft and Apple want me to do in terms of "must-have" upgrades and revolutionary GUIs and just stick with their last stable system that does what I want. Put it on the best hardware I can afford and I end up happy.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:they sold it. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      well, they sold it. Sort of comes with the territory. I know if I sold a promise to upgrade and received payment for it, I am pretty sure I am obligated to provide it! Sort by law I believe, although IANAL, so I could be wrong.

      If they had printed the Vista upgrade serial number on the certificate, think how much less of a problem this would be. They could put some of that scratch-off silver gummy junk over it. Then they just make a downloadable ISO (maybe wrapped in an executable that prompts for a blank DVD and burns the image), distribute over torrent, ta-da! Distribution problem fixed.
  6. See two articles down by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    See two articles down:

    ||
    ||
    ||
    \/

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:See two articles down by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      This doesn't apply as a dupe anymore, they changed the story icon from a Billy Borg to Broken Windows.

    2. Re:See two articles down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two articles down: Silicon Valley - Still Important To Tech Advances So Silicon Valley is the reason Dell, HP, et al are slow getting their promised upgrades shipped?

  7. But isn't this what they planned for? by gelfling · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Didn't MS say openly that every $1 of Vista represents $18 of NEW hardware? I think they did. So it's no surprise that there would be a lag. I'm sure that in by the end of the year, all PC's will be moved to Vista and once MS abandons XP the upgrades will fly off the shelf. I was in Staples today and the price for XP Home upgrades and basic Vista was the same. So if you're smart enough to read the box, why would you buy Vista for an upgrade on a machine that's more than a year old and can't run it?

    1. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by stubear · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vista will run just fine on older hardware. I have a 4-5 year old 2.8GHz P4 with a 256MB nVidia 5700 video card and it runs Aero and Vista Business just fine. You can repeat lines like this "...Vista for an upgrade on a machine that's more than a year old and can't run it?" all you want but is no more truer than the first time you said it. Sure, there are some video cards that are a year old that can't run Aero but not running Aero is a vastly different thing than not running Vista.

    2. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by Valdez · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure that you can run Vista Ultimate ($399) on something less than a brand new $7,182 machine.

      The statistic might be right on for a student buying Home standard... $10 from the campus book store will require a new $180 graphics card (given they already have a gig of ram). ;)

      Incidentally, my new box was bolted together shortly after the New Day... and it's running XP64. ;)

    3. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by Danse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, there are some video cards that are a year old that can't run Aero but not running Aero is a vastly different thing than not running Vista.

      Aero is the feature that most regular users associate with Vista. If they don't get that, then why do they even want Vista now? It's not like there are a whole lot of compelling reasons to switch to it at this point. And there are definitely a number of drawbacks. So if their PC can't run Aero, most people probably couldn't care less about getting Vista.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    4. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by rvw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vista will run just fine on older hardware. I have a 4-5 year old 2.8GHz P4 with a 256MB nVidia 5700 video card and it runs Aero and Vista Business just fine. I wouldn't consider that old, just premature.
    5. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

      OSX, Tiger, runs on a G3-400, I do it every day.
      What do you get out of all the extra work the computer is doing to run Vista?
      Can someone who understands better than me explain what all is churning in the background?

    6. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by revlayle · · Score: 1

      SO... if I get a FREE copy, i don't have to upgrade ANYTHING!!? WINNAR :)

    7. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was all ready to mod you up solely for the fact that you used the phrase "couldn't care less" correctly, but sadly, you were already at +5 insightful.

    8. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Didn't MS say openly that every $1 of Vista represents $18 of NEW hardware?

      No. What they said was: Every $1 spent on Vista requires $~8 of hardware, $~6 of replacement software (Office 2007 plus everything else they broke) and $~4 of support to make it work.

      Businesses will look at that and should see that the TCO is through the roof. It makes Macs look cheap by comparison.

      Choose here: Vista Pinto edition, Vista Corvair edition, Vista Edsel edition.

    9. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by wellingj · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking to be flamed here so bear with my reasoning.
      If you are going to stick with windows wouldn't you want the most secure windows?
      Regarless of if my machines could have all the gimicks or not I'd still want security.

      That said, I use Debian Gnu/Linux. I am moving my mom's bug infested box over to Ubuntu.

    10. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Essentially, Microsoft seems to have committed a severe blunder.

      They decided to require fancy graphics cards to run the best version of Vista. This is because Vista offloads the graphics performance from the CPU to the card. This also means that the extremely common "shared memory" graphics subsystems are unusable with the modern Vista, making a lot of strong-selling hardware obsolete overnight. This is the same hardware that makes the $299 PC possible, so you can probably tell how happy this makes hardware vendors.

      The funny thing is that if you have a 400mhz Titanium PowerBook you get those effects and they run a little slowly but just fine overall. Surely the right thing to do with a modern 3.2ghz PC would be to make the effects run off the CPU unless the graphics card was capable, like Apple does with the MacOS?

      I have to guess that Microsoft really wanted to sell video cards, but not even the video card makers seem too happy about this - early reports indicate that driver support still seems a bit shaky.

      So why does the system essentially require 1gb RAM to run applications, when 512mb is ample for XP? It's hard to believe that much requested features like user account control and trying to protect "premium content" would double the requirements. And using your flash card to increase available RAM seems like an act of desperation.

      My best guess is that Aero Glass is really piggish for some reason, but that doesn't explain why even Vista Basic has similar memory requirements ...

      Maybe some other Slashdotters can tell you about that, but hopefully at least I've clarified the video issue a bit.

      D

    11. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by sabernet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Prompting people to accept every little action does not a secure Windows make. XP is fine by Windows standards. Vista is garnished to seem safer, but annoys you with so many dialogues requesting you to double and triple check what you are about to do as to desensitize you into paying attention to the actual warning in the first place.

      I've had few if any truly horrid security problems with my Windows. Those that I know which have had done so by running that which they shouldn't, trusting untrustable content or just simply acting irresponsibly. Vista can't change that. It can only look prettier as it's failing.

    12. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by Danse · · Score: 1

      If you are going to stick with windows wouldn't you want the most secure windows?
      Regarless of if my machines could have all the gimicks or not I'd still want security.

      At this point, we don't even know if Vista is much more secure for most uses than XP. Some of us have been using XP just fine for at least a few years without having our boxes pwned and added to some dweeb's zombie army, or succumbing to any number of viruses that have gone around in that time. Vista hasn't been out long enough for it to be proven secure yet. Some of its security features are so annoying to users that they will likely disable them as well, negating at least some of the benefits of using it in the first place. I'm simply saying that the smartest move for most people is to at least wait for a year or so until sometime after the first service pack before deciding whether to make the move to Vista. An added benefit is that hardware capable of running it well will be cheaper too.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    13. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Vista is a pig because it was coded with spaghetti code and visual studio crapware
      that adds bloat, and all the new DRM I am sure adds weight as well.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    14. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by akac · · Score: 1

      Visual Studio beats the pants off any dev environment I've ever used. Its nowhere near crapware - in fact, it is the ONE piece of MS code I'd love to use on my Mac instead of xCode. But Vista itself was poorly coded.

    15. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My 2GHz athlon with AGP geforce GT6800 is just about a year old. Before that, I had an athlon 900 for several years. I only upgraded because I wanted to play quake4 and doom3 (not many other choices...it's a linux box :). For an OS to require this type of hardware just to run the base OS well is silly. I'd prefer that hardware being used for the stuff I run, not for the ugly, inefficient windows interface that gets in your way more than helps.

    16. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by sydb · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a US/UK thing because I've never met anyone here who mangles it, I only see it on slashdot... but yes it's nice to see.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    17. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      I couldn't care less about Aero either - it's as fugly as ass. (There's something awkward about translucent borders on a non-translucent window).

    18. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      They decided to require fancy graphics cards to run the best version of Vista. This is because Vista offloads the graphics performance from the CPU to the card. This also means that the extremely common "shared memory" graphics subsystems are unusable with the modern Vista, making a lot of strong-selling hardware obsolete overnight. This is the same hardware that makes the $299 PC possible, so you can probably tell how happy this makes hardware vendors.

      Too right... I bought two machines last month, just before 30th Jan to make sure they had XP on them and NOT Vista. Both machines are advertised as Vista capable... one machine (AMD Sempron 2800+) has 512 MB ram with 128MB shared graphics is entitled to a free Vista Home Basic upgrade (which we won't be redeeming), and mine (AMD64 x2 3800+) 1 GB ram with 256MB shared graphics) is entitled to a free Vista Home PRemium upgrade...

      we won't be bothering with the upgrades... we will be sticking Feisty Fawn on when it's officially released (Edgy Eft doesn't support the ethernet chip, but Feisty does) and keeping reduced XP partitions just for a few programs we already own.

      the Vista boxes aren't flying off the shelves in good old blighty... it's stupidly expensive... you can easily buy a base unit with XP on it for the cost of a Vista retail license. One dreads to think just how much of the cost of a current PC is made up of the cost of Vista to the OEMs.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    19. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by wildBoar · · Score: 1

      only it isn't free. I got asked to pay 80 euros in 'handling and shipping charges'. Thats a lot of shipping and handling by anyones standards.

    20. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

      Vista Basic doesn't come with Aero

    21. Re:But isn't this what they planned for? by revlayle · · Score: 1

      They better be shipping a WHOLE new computer with that for an 80 Euro shipping charge

  8. Not true. by DogDude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    GF ordered a Gateway laptop a few weeks ago. Wanted XP, but she ordered on Vista's release date, and they said they would only sell Vista. If she decides to keep it, it ships at the end of February.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She ordered a laptop with Vista?! You must dump her. :)

    2. Re:Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The not true part is that your girlfriend could order the laptop. German Shepherds can't type!

      LOL @ DogFucker!

    3. Re:Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do not tire, Frank. We see everything.

      Look at this asshole! link: http://www.carrboro.com/phydeaux/...

      Seriously: don't you want to kick his scrawny fuckin' ass, too?

      You know you do. And we wil.

  9. Vista is the Final Frontier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least for my computer

  10. God I remember this hell. WinModem! by WarlockD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was working at an "experimental" call center. Place was called Stream and the client was Dell. The objective was to figure out if the customer had a simple problem or if one that required level 2 support. (Bit more complicated than that, but that's the jest) I was working there between the great Windows 95 to Windows 98 upgrade. It was miserable for ANYONE with one of those damn USR Robotics modems. It got to the point where we would NOT send out a replacement modem unless the customer did a complete reinstall, from scrach, not with the rebuild image. It also didn't help that most of our techs had a 75% turnaround in three months, couldn't speak English well, and that we told the customer we would call them in 48 hours to "help" them though the reinstall. Gezz. Thank god I work on Dell Servers now. Dell afford to piss off their consumer customers, but not their enterprise. PS - I remember the trainer telling me that Dell is for "quality" and would never sell a computer under $1,000. Even when he said that, I laughed. (1998-1999 was when he told us)

  11. sound card crashes vista w/ blue screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I upgraded to vista, but I have to disable my sound card in the device manager before rebooting or Vista will not start up. The sound card driver is provided by MS from Windows Update. Why would they provide a driver that crashes the system, and even alerts you that it is not made for vista?

    I wrote about it here, if anyone cares.

    1. Re:sound card crashes vista w/ blue screen by SlayerDave · · Score: 1

      I read your blog entry and it sounds like you have a hardware problem. I have Vista and a Realtech 97 and have had no problems. (Note my Realtech is the motherboard sound chip, not an add-in card. I also have a SoundBlaster X-Fi, which also works fine with Creative's beta drivers.) The only Vista problem I've had so far is some sort of bug in Firefox that causes the webpage to jitter rapidly up and down by a few pixels. Other than that, no problems of any kind.

    2. Re:sound card crashes vista w/ blue screen by i_dream_in_black_and · · Score: 1

      The sound card works fine except for during the startup process. I enable it after booting and jam iTunes no problem. It works fine under Linux. Interestingly, I have no firefox problems. I should add that multi-monitor support sucks bad too, just for a low jab on my way out the door.

    3. Re:sound card crashes vista w/ blue screen by SlayerDave · · Score: 1

      Weird. Is the sound card on the mobo or is it a PCI card? Re: my Firefox problems, they only started when I upgraded to 64-bit Vista. I had no issues with that in 32-bit.

    4. Re:sound card crashes vista w/ blue screen by i_dream_in_black_and · · Score: 1

      it is the one built into the motherboard. It is a new Asus socket 775 SLI board.

    5. Re:sound card crashes vista w/ blue screen by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I've had some issues installing my Creative X-Fi card when running XP. The motherboard I'm using is an Asus P5B Deluxe. In the BIOS, PnP OS support is set to "NO". This can cause a resource problem if XP or Vista doesn't except the mapped values handed out by the BIOS. I know for a fact that these two OSes love to set the resources themselves. Also, it's necessary for the OS to juggle them around should you add or remove hardware in the future.

      Basically, just set PnP OS to "YES". Format, and then reinstall Vista. I'm fairly confident your issue will be resolved.

      BTW, it wouldn't hurt to update your BIOS revision while you're at it.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  12. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Re:Slowly but sure by jackharrer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I upgraded 1 computer in my company (my friend's one, didn't work with XP, hardware problems). After everybody saw it, nobody wants it anymore. Especially after problems with installation of few crucial programs (ie. Acrobat Reader 8, but 7 was fine). And those people use IE and think that Windows is the only operating system.
    Plus windows didn't detect 3 different USB memory sticks. They simply didn't work. But USB mouse and keyboard are fine...

    I've seen enough. Bells and whistles are not enough for operating system to be successful.

    --

    "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
  14. Winders Veesta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes using Windows is a support disaster

    1. Re:Winders Veesta by amuro98 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No! Don't you see? Vista was designed to do two things: sell hardware and stimulate the tech support service industry.

  15. Real Question by okinawa_hdr · · Score: 1

    What is the major draw of upgrading to Vista?

    1. Re:Real Question by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mostly? Finally a Microsoft OS that can run 64 bit reliably, WITH 32 bit support.

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    2. Re:Real Question by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Believe it or not, some people are just brainwashed.

      We had someone (not a techie, but a user with a silent L) verbally call Vista the "latest and greatest." (Personal aside, I want to find whoever coined that term and just beat them to a bloody pulp.)

      Never mind we're having nothing but problems getting it working for them; they seem oblivious to this. (And no AV support until May...)

      MS should just cut to the chase and call the next Windows what it is... "Windows Shiny Car Keys" *dingle, dangle* You like the new shiny, don't ya? Shiny shiny!

    3. Re:Real Question by Valdez · · Score: 1
      No AV support until May?


      Who did you trick into paying you to do IT work? I have some ocean front property over in Arizona...

    4. Re:Real Question by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is the major draw of upgrading to Vista?

      The features include:

      • UI prettiness, like translucent window borders
      • indexed searching, so you can search for terms within some file types, relatively quickly and globally
      • an attempt at proper admin and user account separation to try and gain some of the security benefits
      • quick access mini-apps
      • more included applications like a DVD burning app, picture viewer/organizer, backup utility, chat/video client, etc.
      • parental controls
      • speech recognition
      • better encryption integration/ease of use

      A lot of these features have been on other OS's for quite a while, but they are welcome additions to Windows for people who are used to them on other platforms, but need to use Windows occasionally. In a year or so once it is stabilized and third parties have things together, it will probably be an improvement on XP

    5. Re:Real Question by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      Better pr0n of course!

    6. Re:Real Question by jcgam69 · · Score: 1

      IF you can find 64 bit drivers for your hardware. Good luck with that.

    7. Re:Real Question by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      True enough. I'm hoping blindly that with the release of Vista 64, that drivers will become available. Here's hoping.

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    8. Re:Real Question by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      nipple clamps, pointy hooks in the skin & hot wax on the balls just ain't doing it like it used to.
      time to upgrade to vista.

    9. Re:Real Question by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was compiling and running 64-bit apps in 1998. That's like listing "doesn't decapitate driver in the event of crash" in the list of safety features in a modern car.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    10. Re:Real Question by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      :-(

      The point is, it's a major release of an OS which supports it NOT as an afterthought, as Windows XP x64 was.

      Hopefully, enough people will port their drivers to it, and we'll all be happy.

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    11. Re:Real Question by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Additionally, better 64 bit support. This is rather subjective too, but it seems to have better multi-proc support as well.

      And accelerating your desktop using the video card actually does help with responsiveness.

    12. Re:Real Question by Rycross · · Score: 1

      It was pretty easy to find 64 bit drivers for all my hardware. nVidia video card, RAID controller, nForce 4, SB Audigy 2, Gigabit ethernet, etc.

    13. Re:Real Question by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in my case, it's a laptop. *GuLp*

      Here's hoping. :-)

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    14. Re:Real Question by okinawa_hdr · · Score: 1

      Oh, in that case sign me up.

    15. Re:Real Question by SlayerDave · · Score: 1

      I upgraded because I'm an enthusiast(*) and I like having the latest products. I'm also a heavy PC gamer, and I knew I would need to upgrade eventually for DX10 games, so why wait? While the most visible changes to Vista are cosmetic, the OS as a whole is easier to use than XP. Little things like the reorganized Start Menu and pull-down menus in the address bar make for a system that's easier to navigate. None of the most apparent changes are all that revolutionary, but Vista as a whole is an improvement over XP.

      (*) Not an apologist.

    16. Re:Real Question by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Supposedly improved security for Windows users, which in turn may use Windows for a number of reasons, often being software support and either incompatibility or inconvenience with either emulators or VM's.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    17. Re:Real Question by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      It's due to the particular suite we use:
      http://esupport.trendmicro.com/support/viewxml.do? ContentID=EN-1034059&id=EN-1034059

      Apparently the SMB software gets the scraps of the coding team.

    18. Re:Real Question by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      And MS, marketing genius that it is, is trying to make Vista VM-proof and emulator-proof. People who want to develop for Vista may have no choice but to have a computer with actual Genuine Windows Vista(TM) actually installed on it.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    19. Re:Real Question by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Yes. Be happy with your DRM-encrusted shit and ever-slower computer.

      Don't you buy a better computer to do things better, not to just support a slower, shittier OS?

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    20. Re:Real Question by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      You don't make much money, do you......

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    21. Re:Real Question by Valdez · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's some useful clarification. Makes sense now.

  16. I can't possibly understand why...nose in the way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And once he's through with that. He can address those ridiculous resource requirements. I suspect most geek computers exceed those by a mile since they're the only ones who will be buying the OS.

  17. Re:God I remember this hell. WinModem! by operagost · · Score: 4, Informative

    You guys really sucked for forcing people to totally wipe their computers when all you needed to do was uninstall the Winmodem software (I assume that's what these junkers were), delete the USR infs from %systemroot%\inf, reinstall the software, and reboot. Clearly, those INFS were still hanging around.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  18. Re:The good news is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should know...

  19. Support disaster? by PingXao · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about a lawsuit disaster? IIRC it's fraud if you make a material statement that convinces someone to make a purchase ("this machine will run Vista") and that statement is false. Hell, that's not only a lawsuit disaster, it's a criminal activity disaster too!

    1. Re:Support disaster? by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As long as they're not specifying which version of Vista it will run, they'll easily find a way around that one. The lowest version of Vista should have no trouble on current hardware.

    2. Re:Support disaster? by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Informative

      The lowest version of Vista should have no trouble on current hardware.


      Then they've already prepared for this. IIRC, all those free Vista upgrades being given out were for Home Basic. Dell comes through on their promise for free Vista upgrades in the cheapest, yet technically correct sense possible.
    3. Re:Support disaster? by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Especially if you're only going to be running the OS, and not other applications.

      My local Best Buy was selling Vista systems that had as little as 256MB of RAM that was shared with the on-board video card. True, these only had Home-Basic on them, but still, you can't tell me that a box with only 128-192MB of system RAM is going to be running Vista very well.

    4. Re:Support disaster? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Don't look now, but your upgrade might just be the obscure, little-mentioned "Vista Retro", otherwise known as Windows 2000.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:Support disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple sold pre-G3 PowerMacs with the promise that they'd run the modern Rhapsody OS (soon to be renamed Mac OS X) but the support never materialized. I'm not into lawsuits, but I blame myself for having conscientiously supported the then-troubled Apple Computer Inc. by buying a very expensive doorstop instead of waiting to see if the company would just die or actually stand by their promises.


      Needless to say that I haven't bought anything with an apple logo since and that also made me realize how important it is to support (hardware and software) vendors who provide open-source solutions.

  20. Could be a support disaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I am not going to say who I work for, but I will say I am a tier 2 support tech. for one of the largest PC vendors.

    Support for Vista is already a disaster. Customer complaints are rampant, mostly with video problems that are directly a result of bad drivers. In the past, at least we had enough knowledge to get our job done. We could have confidence in newer drivers and we could be relatively sure the machines could support Windows XP. Today, Microsoft has changed the game so much that we are fucked. Troubleshooting this system is almost an entirely different game, so we are forced to play wack-a-mole all day. On the bright side, our product lines are getting a decent overhaul with more standardization. In the mean time, you guys are playing a crapshoot, the result of slapping the Vista logo on anything we can to meet our marketing promises.

    When Vista becomes dominant in the mainstream, all of you can expect loads of problems unless Microsoft and the hardware vendors straighten things out. Sure, we should have platform standards. We all know Windows sucks largely because of how badly drivers are written, but they are doing it by screwing with us, the hardware vendors. My group knows what the hell we're doing. We would not be as big as we are if we didn't, but Microsoft are making our lives nearly impossible because they do not consider in the least what we need to support our products.

    My advice: do not think you can buy either Dell or HP or from any of the other big vendors soon and expect Vista to work entirely as advertised. Wait a year. Stick with XP or buy a Mac.

  21. Re:Slowly but sure by Scyth3 · · Score: 1

    The slight irony to what you said is that it already had hardware problems. Who's to say if that had an affect on your install of Vista?

    Oh, and I don't intend to upgrade till SP1. Guaranteed.

  22. This could be a support disaster by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    No, a migration from red hat to solaris would be a support disaster.

    This is IT people using a little forethought and pacing while rolling out an upgrade.

    O NOES DOOM AN GLOOM THERES ANOTHER VERSION OF WINDOWS - MS is GONNA LAP THE OSS COMMUNITY ONCE AGAIN

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:This could be a support disaster by sulfur_lad · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. In commerce, it definitely falls on the vendors to provide the products they promised, especially if they've already sold them. Here though, "free" upgrade implies you didn't actually pay for it, so really they can say "sorry, it's going to take a little while." This is the same reason your mail-in rebates on RAM take an aeon to process.

      You definitely feel for the vendors here though. They're dealing with a lot of lay-people, and upgrading them to Vista remotely is a whole lot more tedious than just doing it in the lab before you ship the computer.

      thanks for the all-caps, that's great. :)

    2. Re:This could be a support disaster by DLG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Again, as it has been pointed out clearly, if you promise something free upon purchase of something else that is not the same thing as simply offering to give something away for free, with a buyer beware, you get what you pay for.

      Dell specifically offered to provide free upgrades to Vista for people who were buying Vista ready machines before the release, to get holiday sales.

      We can assume that the reason really is the fact that they are shipping upgrades as fast as they can and the only folks who are going to be loud are the ones waiting. To suggest that they are really trying to hold off shipment until they can produce a disk with drivers that work for hardware they already certified as ready would be fraudulent (selling hardware they promise meets Microsofts criteria for whichever level of compatibility without it being true is a class action lawsuit, or a recall)

      In any case the likeliest answer is that the release is less than 2 weeks old, we have had terrible winter weather over that time, and the number of people who idiotically were unable to wait to get a computer preloaded with their OS, probably is greater than expected, mostly because they have no idea what it really means to upgrade an OS, since its been some 5 years since there has been a major release.

  23. Can't even get through the online form by Barbarian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought a Toshiba A100-TA9 laptop, with the promise of a free upgrade. When I go to the upgrade site, after I select the country (Canada), I am presented with blank drop-down boxes to select the current version I have. I assume this is due to multiple language versions (English and French) in Canada. Email to support is entirely unhelpful.

    At the beginning of January, the form was working, but the server would time out at the very end.

    1. Re:Can't even get through the online form by wildBoar · · Score: 1

      once you get to the shipping page you find out that your FREE upgrade costs 80 euros in shippng and handling fees. There must be an awful lot of manuals in there ....

  24. Re:The good news is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parents basement is such a cliche

  25. not running on an apple by Ace905 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not running an apple ; mostly because I have a pc right here in front of me so why pay more money. But is there any reason now NOT to run an apple? Microsoft would have done better to not release vista ; they're ensuring people hate them and try the competition.

    If I were a shareholder, i would sell sell sell.

    I think it's a safe bet to say every shareholder should short-sell before every major release of windows. They do this every single time. Hype it up, stock goes up, release it, disappointing everyone, stock goes down, holding pattern, start all over again.

    ---
    SELL SELL SELL! | Sometimes I'm bored

    --

    Ace
    1. Re:not running on an apple by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cost?

      I heavily use a 12" PowerBook which dual boots with OS X Tiger and Ubuntu Edgy Eft. It's great, often I use OS X heavily and am very happy with it. But the thing cost me $1500 when I bought it a year and a half ago.

      I've been wanting to buy a new desktop, but the options are limited. I could get a Mini, but you can't expand it. I don't want to have to clutter up my desk with multiple external drives and audio interfaces (I do audio editing in my spare time, so I need lots of storage and good audio interfaces). The only option for something expandable is a Mac Pro, which is ~$2000.

      Instead I built a Core 2 Duo E6600 based machine with a ASUS P5B Deluxe, two 320GB sata drives, 2GB DDR2 800 ram, M-Audio Delta 1010LT sound, etc for $1100. It's now running Ubuntu Edgy Eft and works perfectly.

      If Apple would sell some midrange machines that were expandable I would of bought a Mac for that instead.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    2. Re:not running on an apple by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not just stick with XP?

      Who exactly is forcing you to upgrade, to Vista, Apple, or anything else? I've felt no pressure.

      Also I don't get the logic. Apple releases a new OS every year for you to buy, MS, 5 or more. Ultimately, you'll be out the same amount (well, a little more) with the Mac upgrade cycle.

      Why do you feel so much better about needlessly tossing money to Apple than to Microsoft. This, I don't understand about the "switcher" mentality.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:not running on an apple by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This may or may not impact you but I also factor in add-ons such as anti virus, office suites etc. *AND* my time.

      Linux loses for me since I do not want to spend the time to fiddle with it (also you could factor in a bill rate, say $40/hr for how much it costs you in time), and MS loses due to cost of anti-virus and other add-ons and the amount of time I have to fiddle with it to get it to work.

      When I factor all then in I think Apple was my best, least expensive purchase overall.

      Of course YMMV

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:not running on an apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Linux loses for me since I do not want to spend the time to fiddle with it (also you could factor in a bill rate, say $40/hr for how much it costs you in time)


      This was once a valid factor. Today it is not. With Ubuntu, you can get the entire OS AND all the hardware drivers and applications you need installed and auto-configured in ~30 minutes, most of which is spent watching the progress bars. Upgrading all of your existing software, or adding a new app, is generally an under-one-minute process.

      Ubuntu utterly demolishes Windows on required maintenance effort (about as close to zero as you can get). The Windows software installation process of "run an .exe, go through a wizard and accept all the defaults, wait, wait, reboot" seems horribly archaic in comparison. I'm not too familiar with OSX, but I suspect it's between the two, and probably closer to the Ubuntu side.

    5. Re:not running on an apple by littlem · · Score: 2, Informative

      But is there any reason now NOT to run an apple?
      Not wanting to run a non-free operating system seems like a pretty good reason.
    6. Re:not running on an apple by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      This may or may not impact you but I also factor in add-ons such as anti virus I don't use it. Even on Windows. If you use common sense and a user-level account it's not that important. If you're the kind of person to search warez and porn sites and download random "FREE!!!!!" screensavers, cursors, and other programs then yeah, it's required (and still not very effective).

      office suites With OS X you'd still have to pay for one. I use OpenOffice on Linux and Windows and NeoOffice/J on OS X. If I wanted to run MS Office there is still Crossover, so I can run it.

      *AND* my time. Linux loses for me since I do not want to spend the time to fiddle with it My time is also valuable. This is why I like running Ubuntu. Including the install time, I have a usable desktop with all the software I use and configured to my tastes in about 45 minutes.

      When I factor all then in I think Apple was my best, least expensive purchase overall. Apple hardware and software rocks. I love using my PowerBook. I just wish they'd make midrange systems that were expandable. I don't expect them to compete with the $300 PoS machines out there, but something around $1000 that can be expanded would be awesome.
      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    7. Re:not running on an apple by just_another_sean · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linux loses for me since I do not want to spend the time to fiddle with it

      Anyone who trots out this tired old line hasn't tried Linux in a while. Ubuntu, Mepis, Fedora, hell if your time is so valuable paying for Linspire is an option, all install just about everything you need out of the box to get work done.

      Oh, playing games? Not on a Mac, at least not that many and my guess is that's not what you mean.

      The only other thing I can think of that may take time to get setup on Linux but not on a Mac is audio/video. Not sure about what a Mac comes loaded with out of the box and what you have to download and install yourself but all of the distros I listed above have quick, painless ways to install codecs and players in minutes*.

      So, um, yeah, Vista sure is pissin' off people and OEMs...

      * assumes broadband connection is available.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    8. Re:not running on an apple by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Good point. I have had to tweak every distro I've tried. But...

      Once it is set up the way you like it, that's it. It just runs. and works.
      If you do have problems, it's not as much a mystery to resolve as in windows. I've been able to fix and adjust a few things without having previous experience or knowledge about them. And again, once they are addressed, they are never a problem again. Extend that to just tarring up your home directory, and extracting it to the shiney new box when you upgrade. Much easier than moving your working environment to a new windows box, IMNSHO.

      Not for everybody, definitely. But if you have to invest the time to fix, adjust, or customise something anyway, it's nice to do it on an OS where the fix is relatively easy, and it stays fixed.

    9. Re:not running on an apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux loses for me since I do not want to spend the time to fiddle with it (also you could factor in a bill rate, say $40/hr for how much it costs you in time),

      So when you take a shit, it costs you like $10? Watch a crappy tv show, it costs you $40? Eating dinner is worth $20?

      I can smell the bullshit from here.

      Oh wait, you are an apple fan-boy, your shit doesn't stink...

  26. Bandwagon Users... by Beefslaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It comes down to marketshare. Microsoft KNOWS they have the market share, and are FORCING users to seek their new Windows ME 2007 (aka Vista)...I'm not biting this time. And I will use my last professional dying breath to tell everyone to stay away.

    I keep telling customers and clients to stay away from Microsoft. Their response is "What else is there?"

    I spout off about 4 or 5 good, stable, and secure systems, including Apple. They tell me they are not graphic designers. I then tell them that I can't help them unless they think outside the MS box.

    I am treating Vista like a plague. And everyone that has a lick of technological expertise should be on that bandwagon.

    Brainwashed is EXACTLY what they are.

    Time for Linux to step up to the plate. There is such a NEED for a "Super Wine" project to take a big bite out of Microsoft's ass.

    1. Re:Bandwagon Users... by sottitron · · Score: 1

      Brainwashed is EXACTLY what they are.

      ...and what does that make you?? I am not here to sing Vista's praises, but Microsoft's philosophy is no different than that of the company who made the car you are driving... Lets say you need a new front seat for you Ford. You can't exactly call up Chevrolet and say, 'Hey can you beat this price Ford is quoting me for a front seat?' I think the reason we have OS X is that Microsoft put out good enough software for Apple to see the writing on the wall and realize that OS 8 wasn't going to keep up. Same goes for Linux. Do you think Ubuntu came about in a vacuum? No, its compared to XP's ease of use every day by just about anybody trying to get a Windows user to switch.
    2. Re:Bandwagon Users... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I dislike Microsoft as much as the next guy and think Wine is a great way to get users to switch, but what are YOU doing to help the Wine project? Are you testing applications, reporting the messages and making Wine better each day? It's one thing to preach that people should switch, but if you tell them to switch and they have a bad taste, they are less likely to switch again in the future. I don't know how many of my friends have tried Linux back in the Redhat 4 days and been completely turned off up until this day thinking that Linux is a mess of dependency problems, interface nightmares and lack of "replacement" software for their everyday tasks. Even the MP3 nightmare today keeps some people away simply because they can't open their song and play it without having to run command lines to edit their yum configuration in Fedora 6. Sure, Ogg Vorbis may be a better format, but go into Best Buy and tell the guy/girl behind the conter that your looking for an Ogg player and (s)he'll stare at you funny unless (s)he truly knows what it is.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Bandwagon Users... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because there are no such thing as after-market parts in the auto industry.

      Congratulations, you win this week's Dumbest Car Analogy Award. Please go outside and stare directly into the sun while you wait for your prize to be delivered.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Bandwagon Users... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Me- "Hey, baby, you got an Ogg player here?"

      Her- "Uh, what?!?!"

      Me- "You know, the Ogg baby! I gotta Ogg my tunes, ya know!"

      Her- "Er, maybe you're in the wrong place?"

      Me- "Nah, baby, I know you want gimme some Ogg."

      Her- "Let me check, give me a second.... (whispers into store phone- "Security!!!!!")" ...

      Security- "Sir, I think you have to leave now"

      Me- "Dude, I just wanna Ogg all night long!"

      Sec- "Sir, we do not appreciate this behavior in this store."

      Me- "What are you talking about, Ogg is the shizzle nizzle, baby!"

      Sec- "Sir, I insist that you leave NOW."

      Me- "Man, whatever happened to being in Ogg Funkytown! This is so RIAA MPAA DRMed non-Oggness that I'm just gonna go!" ...

      Her- "What was that about?"

      Sec- "I'm not sure, but I think he was looking for an egg in some funky type of town. And it looks like he peed on the floor. Must have been on drugs."

      Disclaimer- not a real story

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    5. Re:Bandwagon Users... by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

      I am VERY active in other parts of the open source community.

      My talents lie in mail technologies, that's what I develop.

      I deploy those talents at will, because they are proven in the SERVER environments. There is only so many hours in a day my friend. My contribution to the Open Source movement is the application of it every possible way I can. And those projects that I can help with I will; whether its monetarily (winex, crossover office) or with my skillset (postfix, amavisd, spamassassin and others).

      My point is that the Linux community is missing a beautiful opportunity to take a larger share of the Desktop world. The problem is that there are 10 distros going in 10 different directions.

      Apple/Mac IS a very viable solution. But when you have Microsoft Whores for Sys Admins and web developers, then it's not going to work (The MCSE's of the world are now going to PAY for their loyalty, along with their companies and employers). Your ability to make industry standard solutions is your true judge of talent.

    6. Re:Bandwagon Users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow all that bitterness you guys have worked up over the years and drives some people a little crazy around here.

    7. Re:Bandwagon Users... by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      I think the reason we have OS X is that Microsoft put out good enough software for Apple to see the writing on the wall and realize that OS 8 wasn't going to keep up.
      :blink:

      You do realise that OS X is 'X' as in the roman numeral, 10, right? And that OS 9 came out two years before XP? And that this was followed by OS X in 2001, 6 months or so before XP?

      And do you further realise that most of the features in Vista are a long-awaited attempt to catch up to the features which were in OS X, either before XP or at some point since then?

      Making statemtents like this (following a Dumbest Car Analogy Award-winning car analogy) just make you look silly.

      Same goes for Linux. Do you think Ubuntu came about in a vacuum? No, its compared to XP's ease of use every day by just about anybody trying to get a Windows user to switch.
      Do you mean Ubuntu has a GUI? Just because they're trying to get people to switch away from Windows doesn't mean they're desperately trying to catch up. That's Microsoft's job - they play catch up in the technology side in order to keep themselves massively ahead on the market share.
  27. It's been a major pain to get the upgrade so far.. by RyanFenton · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been trying to get ahold of the upgrade for my copy of XP Pro I got when piecing together a system for myself. Not that I plan on installing it in the next year, I just don't want to have to pay for it if I do have to test or use software with Vista. The upgrade offer ends in March, I believe, so I'd like to get the disk... but it's been a MAJOR pain working through the third party that Microsoft has been using to get the Vista upgrades.

    Quick info on sites and phone numbers to use:

    https://upgradeweb.moduslink.com/vista/default.asp x

    This is the rather buggy ASP website that is used to request an update.

    I had to contact Newegg for a coupon code to use for the upgrade, but had ASP errors on trying to use the page, so I had to call this number several times:

    1-800-817-5602

    The folks there are nice, but a mixed bag - they're throwing Microsoft/Moduslink employees there at a rapid pace, with little training. When I asked for an upgrade to a higher level of support, they had no one to send me to - but they were rather cool and honest about the situation despite the confusion.

    At the end (thus far), I'll have to send a printed copy of my Newegg reciept to an address to get my upgrade. Don't know what kind of recourse I'd have if they just denied my upgrade request... the whole process has really been more painful than I expected, even with Microsoft support, even with fairly friendly folks to help me through it.

    Ryan Fenton

  28. upgrades might be slow but ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The upgrades might be going at snails pace but every new pc being shipped is shipping with vista. It wont be long before there are more installations of Vista than Firefox.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:upgrades might be slow but ... by mandelbr0t · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course the first thing any smart Vista user would do is replace IE7 with Firefox. ;)

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    2. Re:upgrades might be slow but ... by fermion · · Score: 1
      I think this has to do with Vista readiness for prime time. What is easy to do is to get code ready for use with a limited audience. For instance, a corporation with support covered by a predetermined contract, or OEM who cover their own testing and support. What is quite different is Vista running on a generic machine, something that I think will never happen. Another data point are reviewers that have trouble getting a copy of Vista, something that can neither be a cost or supply issue. It can only be that Vista cannot reliably run on a generic PC.

      Therefore, the push is going to be towards the Dell, HP, Toshiba, and the like. If nothing else, the prices structure clearly shows that they have no interest in selling upgrades, except at the basic level where the OS is doing so little any device will work. I think MS has looked at the rate of upgrades, and decided, as so many has done in the past, that fully supporting legacy hardware is not nost justified. My only struggle in all this is that the next time I am forced to buy a PC, it will run Vista and not XP.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  29. Here is my issue. by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I submitted for an upgrade waited weeks and weeks, and then sent an e-mail to the support email asking why I had not received it, and if I had somehow mad an error in the documentation and such that I had sent.

    I got a reply that said "Thank you for submitting to customer service, your upgrade order has been cancelled per your request so that you can re-submit with the correct information."

    So instead of verifying my order, they canceled it, and the page to do submissions are gone, and besides that the documentation said "no copies of this documentation will be accepted," but I had already submitted the documentation via physical snail mail. So I have essentially been SCREWED out of 200 bucks worth of software.

    To put it mildly, I will never purchase Windows Vista, and I am sure the Pirate bay can help me get the software I was promised. I have never before had a request for information turn into such a fraudulent cancellation before, and since I already paid for it, I am not feeling under any obligation to purchase it again.

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    1. Re:Here is my issue. by b1scuit · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more that you were screwed out of $180 and $20 worth of software, but that's just quibbling.

  30. Re:Slowly but sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bells and whistles are not enough for operating system to be successful."

    Apparently Apple would beg to differ >.>;

  31. Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by rvw14 · · Score: 1

    What were your acrobat 8 problems? I am going to be running Vista Business on a work computer (At least I will be as soon as dell sends the disk.) to test all our software and many of our internal docs are in .pdf format (don't ask, not my choice).

    1. Re:Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      I have three machines running Acrobat Reader 8 on Vista without problems. There's a lot of FUD and people talking out of their ass about application and hardware compatibility on Vista. Considering Acroread 8 is explicitly supported by Adobe on Vista, I would imagine the grandparent is one of them.

    2. Re:Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by OfNoAccount · · Score: 1

      Why does anyone still use Acrobat Reader anyway? Try downloading Foxit Reader instead - it's faster, smaller, and works just fine under Vista. I didn't have any driver issues with this Shuttle box, but then it's only a 3.6GHz toaster (sorry P4) anyway ;)

    3. Re:Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by pD-brane · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about simple alternatives, try Xpdf, which is the same size (and also fast) and above all Free Software.

    4. Re:Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      More to the point, he's starting with a computer that has hardware problems. (First sentence, he says it won't run XP because it has hardware problems.)

      Why would he *expect* Vista to run flawlessly on a computer with hardware problems? Gee, do you think it didn't detect the USB memory sticks because of the hardware problems? News flash: OSes running on bad hardware don't work well!

      What he's done is made a FUD-machine he can show to people to demonstrate how horrible Vista is to people nearby who would never suspect that the problems are due to faulty hardware. In reality, the fact that the computer runs Vista *at all* (considering it won't run XP) should be considered a major success for Microsoft.

    5. Re:Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by archen · · Score: 1

      I had problems with acrobat 8 on vista as well. The machine kept saying that my tempdir was invalid. It I checked my paths and even manually set the environment variables to C:\temp, and checked my profile temp and %windir%/temp - still no luck. It seemed like it was looking for some f'ed up DOS path or something. I never got it to work on that install. Eventually I reformatted (again) and it worked okay. It's possible one of the additional updates that came along when I was trying to work through this problem for 2 days fixed it, but aside from that I'm pretty baffled.

      When people say "There are no problems, everything is just fine", they are only speaking from their one little corner of a billion possible problems/configurations. I was expecting slight changes like 98->XP or 2k-2003, but there is certainly a lot of changes under the hood that is breaking all sorts of stuff.

    6. Re:Accrobat Reader 8 Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problem. I set the compatibility for Windows XP SP2 and the install worked fine.

  32. Vista's actually pretty good by maynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course some people are having compatibility problems with their upgrades. This is no major surprise. Speaking as one who works in a large NIX shop (university lab), I must say that we've been evaluating Vista and I kindof like it. I still have a Mac and a Linux box on my desk, but I'm expecting us to support Vista by early '08. Also, I will say there is real pent up demand for upgrading both Windows and Office here in our shop. Windows users here are primarily fiscal admins, and I've had several ask me about supporting the Vista and Office 08. All the Mac users (me included) are looking forward to an Intel build for the next Office.

    Vista may be having a slow start, but I think that within a year or so it will be a big winner. I like it (and I haven't had much good to say about Win since forever).

    1. Re:Vista's actually pretty good by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      You're definitely not winning friends here. I agree with you though. So far, Vista hasn't been that bad. The firefox bug that causes twitching has forced me to switch to opera, but besides that almost all of my software works well. My geforce card runs the dual heads without any issues and performance isn't bad at all. (3.8 ghz, 2gb ram)

      A lot of people here call Vista a plague or a bloated POS. Sounds a bit like a head in the sand issue. I don't foresee any large corporations switching to mac/linux solely because of Vista. I'm not a Mac user, so perhaps someone can help me out. Could a homogenus mac-based network supply replacements for SQL server, SAP, exchange? Are the clients able to interoperate with the windows services they replace? Incremental upgrades are key.

      It's not perfect, but as with XP it's "good enough".... and that seems to satisfy most people.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    2. Re:Vista's actually pretty good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I just can't help but laugh at this...

      My geforce card runs the dual heads without any issues and performance isn't bad at all. (3.8 ghz, 2gb ram) ... A lot of people here call Vista a plague or a bloated POS. Sounds a bit like a head in the sand issue.

      Lessee, GeForce card with dual heads, 3.8 G proc and 2 G RAM and performance isn't bad at all. Geeez, man, that is a very high end machine! Vista should just scream on it! Unless a lot of people here are right and Vista is a bloated POS!

  33. Could this be it? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've been reading about how the next version of Windows will be the one that finally contains so much crap, so many bugs, and so many restrictions on your freedom to actually use your own computer for as long as I've been on Slashdot, which is ... dear god, eight or nine years or so now. After Windows 2000 and (especially) XP failed to be complete turkeys that finally opened users' eyes to the possibilities offered by the alternatives. As as result, I am embittered, prematurely aged, and have an irritatingly adolescent habit of peeling off the "Designed for Windows" stickers from any computer I get my hands on and sticking it to toilet flush or kitchen scraps bin. It's taken me almost as long to move from tentative newbie hopelessly failing to install Debian 2.0 to a seasoned professional well used to the process of decontaminating new servers, desktops and laptops, and usually getting all the hardware to work. (WPA2/AES wifi auth, which we use at work, is still a pig involving kernel compilation, and the latest version of Mandriva has broken my access to the corporate PPTP VPN becuase MPPE has been removed from the kernel, and I never managed to acquire any proficiency in the /usr/src/linux shuffle.) But... even having read the much less breathless and reflective piece on the Reg before seeing this, a wild and audacious hope is leaping up in my breast... it's either political advertising subverting ordinary discourse, or it's the end of the beginning of the end for Microsoft. (The beginning, for me, was the anti-trust case. Even though they walked away laughing thanks to Dubya and a foolish judge, anyone in the industry who followed it who DIDN'T already know how evil MS are, were left with no illusions.)

    Please, lord, let it be this time... raise thy noodly appendage and smite they foes!

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    1. Re:Could this be it? by Eythian · · Score: 1

      I haven't used Mandrake in a long time, but in Ubuntu, you install network-manager-gnome (and I think there's a KDE equivalent). That gives you an icon that you can click that will let you connect to WPA2 networks without trouble. I wouldn't be too surprised to find that MDK has something similar. The only real issue with WPA2 with AES is that the firmware in the network card must support it. If it doesn't, the only solution is to by a new network card. Even kernel compiling won't fix that.

    2. Re:Could this be it? by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Yes, the KDE network connection stuff's all present and correct; it just doesn't allow you to use WPA2 with a client cert. Believe me I've looked into it... there's another PITA as well - the Thinkpads we use at work are equipped with Intel 2200-something wifi adapters, for which for some reason closed binary firmware is required to make it work. I thought (being a regular purchaser of OpenBSD who only rarely uses it, but wishes to support the project) that Intel were generally pretty good about sharing hardware specs with Free software developers. Course that's Intel's fault, not Mandriva, Linus or the FSF, of course.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    3. Re:Could this be it? by Eythian · · Score: 1

      Yes, the binary firmware thing is a bit annoying. At Linux.conf.au this year, Keith Packard (who works for Intel on video drivers and runs X.org) made the comment that they wish they could open source the firmware "but then we wouldn't be able to sell to Japan". I presume that Japan has some rules about how easy it should be for radio's power levels to be altered or something.

  34. Re:God I remember this hell. WinModem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the world of big name pc manufacturer technical support.

  35. The devil is in the details... by PHanT0 · · Score: 1

    Trading the devil you know for the devil you don't isn't that great of an "upgrade".
    Some people will argue they like the devil they have...

    Personally Microsoft hasn't showed me a single reason to upgrade beyond a pretty GUI... and there are projects out there to make the devil I've got look like the devil they want me to buy... besides, the "upgrade" package is 1/2 the price of an e-machine... give me a reason not to save twice as much and buy that, move my license to my good PC and install Linux on the e-machine...

    C'mon... XP is the spawn of satan but it's the nicer brother we all know instead of the pretty-boy brother we don't.

  36. Re:It's been a major pain to get the upgrade so fa by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

    They denied my upgrade request when I sent them an information request via their "contact us" link at the bottom so that I could find out if something wrong happened or when I would be getting the upgrade.

    Contacting their support, which says it will reply within 1 business day, took 25 days before my first response.

    So Enjoy getting screwed.

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  37. No Shit. by Luscious868 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Joe Sixpack doesn't upgrade his operating system. Joe Sixpack doesn't know what an operating system is. Joe Sixpack will move to Vista when he buys his next PC with Vista preinstalled. This really should come as no surprise.

    Windows XP Home Edition offered the stability and other improvements of Windows 2000 rolled into a consumer oriented OS. Compared to Windows 98 and (shudder) ME it was a huge improvement for consumers so it's no wonder more people wanted to upgrade to XP. What does Vista offer? A series of confusing versions to choose from, required hardware upgrades for most, software compatibility issues for many, annoying as all hell UAC prompts, Windows Software Protection Platform that can completely lock down your system if it thinks your running a pirated copy of Vista and the list goes on.

    I can't think of one reason I should upgrade to Windows Vista. In fact, XP is the last version of a Microsoft OS that I will run on any PC I own. I've switched to a Mac and I couldn't be happier. I've got Boot Camp installed to play the occasional game but I find I'm spending less and less time gaming so I suspect by the time games appear that are Vista only it will no longer matter.

  38. This is silly by gelfling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The people with a 4 year old machine with those specs are in the upper 1% of PC owners. I know of no one with a one+ year old machine who isn't a high end gamer or code developer who already has 1GB or more on their machine. And you answered your own point vis a vis the video card. If that's the target for Vista upgrades then it's going to be a cold cold winter in Redmond this year. You'd be amazed I think at how few people will chuck $180 for a new video adapter just to run an OS for no other clear reason. You have got be subsidized by someone else if that's how you think.

    1. Re:This is silly by thona · · Score: 1

      Vista runs fine here in computers with an NVidia MX 200, 64 Mbyte graphics card. Age around 4 years. No Aero, but aero is not crucial. 1Gb to 2 gb ram, but then the people DO development.

      And we plan to replace the systems now - but because they are starting to fall apart. The oldest system I have running here is a DUAL PIII. Runs Vista pretty fine.

    2. Re:This is silly by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      When you installed MS Windows Vista, did the installation process recommend not using Aero or does it enable it by default? If it doesn't recommend whether or not to run Aero based on the graphics card then most users with older (not top of the line at the time) cards will probably be disappointed. Hasn't the "Wow" marketing been pushing the Aero interface as a primary reason to upgrade?

      Personally, I'm OK sticking with MS Windows XP at home. I haven't heard any near term plans to roll out Vista where I work (100K+ employees). The few lab systems we had with MS Windows XP 64 bit didn't even last long due to vendor support issues. I would be quite surprised to see MS Windows Vista rolling out anytime before two years from now.

    3. Re:This is silly by gelfling · · Score: 1

      So the advantage to Vista is therefore, what? Isn't it a little bit like a dancing bear? Not so well it dances but that it dances at all?

    4. Re:This is silly by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Um, I just advised someone (2 days ago) to get a £35 (~$70) 7300GT which should run aero fine, this was by no means the cheapest, probably could have picked up something for £20 if I'd have wanted to advise they get the bottom of the heap, but I thought the extra was probably worth it for vista in a year or two, when we will ALL be using it, and I spose by then you'd be able to get one for £10 or less...

    5. Re:This is silly by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Vista died trying to install on my Dual PIII - which runs XP, Linux and FreeBSD just fine.

  39. They got notices? by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    Personally, I can't even manage to get the stupid upgrade program to acknowledge they received the copy of my receipt. I even have a fax confirmation sheet I've sent them twice.

        I think more people took advantage of the program then they where expecting.

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  40. So? Non-disaster support? by redelm · · Score: 1
    uhm ... err ... when is support other than a disaster?

  41. Re:It's been a major pain to get the upgrade so fa by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    Have fun with that. So far fax and email have led to nothing, they still can't confirm they've received the damned receipt.

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  42. Slogan Shouldn't Be "Wow!" by canfirman · · Score: 3, Funny

    With all of the logistical/upgrade/support problems in this release, Microsoft should change the Vista's slogran from "Wow!" to "Doh!"

    --
    It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
  43. Refunds for what? Express Upgrade to Vista is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing to refund.

  44. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Vista-incompatible overlords...

  45. Justification for the lag by sterno · · Score: 1

    I think you point out why Dell, etc, are being pretty smart in rolling this out more slowly. In addition to the obvious driver instability, etc, this really comes down to having enough support resources. If you sent it all out at once you're call centers would collapse under the weight of it. If you send it out piece meal then you can spread the increased demand out over a longer period and thus end up providing a better experience.

    Basically the question is: what pisses off a customer more, having to wait a couple months to get their upgrade or getting their upgrade and then spending days trying to wrestle with tech support because they are overwhelmed.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  46. Thats what you get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For thinking about going with another crippled product from Microsoft. I hope people are starting to wake up and realize there is NO advantage to upgrading to Vista. The Windows OS is dead, its going no where but down hill. Nothing but DRM roadblocks and headaches, viruses, spyware, defragging, etc.

  47. sigh by game+kid · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:sigh by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No, who knows? A rant by an AC??? Yep, makes me want to buy a Mac....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  48. HP bullshit... by modemboy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, gotta love being able to just make up delivery times with no consequences.
    Quote from an email 4 days ago:
    "The Upgrade Software should begin shipping late January 2007. You will receive your Vista/Office software within 4-6 weeks from release date."

    From the upgrade site today:
    "Order Status : Order awaiting shipment
    Shipping Date : TBD. Check back in 2-3 weeks for more information"

    Yeah fuck you HP, lying through your teeth to me...

  49. Damn right - my next computer will be a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck this Windoze shit.

  50. Got it via Amazon by Cassanova · · Score: 1
    I bought a laptop with Windows XP media center last October from Amazon. Two months later Amazon sends me an email with a discount code amounting to $150 towards a copy of Vista Home Premium upgrade. I used the code and ordered Vista upgrade from Amazon before its official release date (Jan 30th). Amazon shipped the upgrade right on dot on Jan 30th. The upgrade was $154 bucks at the time I ordered, but on shipping date it dropped to $152 bucks and Amazon even promptly redfunded the 2 bucks back to my account. I now have the upgrade, purchased for $2, lying on my desk, reading all Vista reviews on the net and comments on Slashdot to determine if I should play with it on my Intel Centrino/1gb memory experimental second PC....

    The best part was I was not even entitled to the $150 discount since it was offered by Microsoft and expired a few days before I purchsed my laptop from Amazon. But Amazon "graciously extended" the offer to all folks who purchased any machine during that month at their expense (or that is what they imply).

  51. Total Legal Bullshit by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 1

    From qdirect:
    Express Upgrade Program for Microsoft® Windows® Vista

    Terms and Conditions: ...
          5. The terms of this upgrade offer may be changed at any time without notice, including, without limitation, the expiration date.
          6. The product will ship within approximately 4- 6 weeks from the later of either the date of order or from the date the applicable language version has been released in the US. This offer is subject to product availability and product supplies.

    What the flying fuck is this bullshit?!?! You get your free upgrade unless we change our mind? Screw that. I relied on the OEM manufacturer's promise that I would get an upgrade to Vista, and no matter how much it sucks, I want to get my money's worth. Who wants to sue?

    1. Re:Total Legal Bullshit by AusIV · · Score: 1

      If they deny people the upgrade, there will be class action suits without a doubt, and such a license agreement won't hold up in just about any court. Personally, I couldn't care less. One more reason I use linux.

    2. Re:Total Legal Bullshit by kpainter · · Score: 1

      If they deny people the upgrade, there will be class action suits without a doubt And the only people who get anything out of class action lawsuits are the lawyers. When it is all said and done, you might get a $50 discount coupon towards the version of your choice of retail Vista.
    3. Re:Total Legal Bullshit by AusIV · · Score: 1

      Probably true, but it will still be a fairly significant cost to the OEMs who have the action taken against them, and they will try to satisfy their customers to avoid the class action rather than say "Our EULA says we don't really have to give you Vista."

    4. Re:Total Legal Bullshit by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

      Microsoft have enough bad publicity as it is. They are reserving the right to expire the coupon when they want so that 10 years from now, when they have a new OS out, people aren't still trying to cash in on Vista when they really want you to buy 'Windows - OS-Z'.

      --
      I have ridden the mighty moon worm!
  52. PB by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upgrade...
    You keep using that word. I do not think that means what you think it means.

    --

    Question everything

  53. Re:God I remember this hell. WinModem! by WarlockD · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yea, I fully admit we did. The main problem was that none of our "techs" were trained. Also was bad management.

    At Stream, we were paid BY THE CALL. It was more cost effective to tell the customer to reinstall, and then call back than to spend 15-20 mins to remove the inf drivers manually. All the while the management pushing for us to have a 15 minute call time. Sure, I might have the skills to bring back a system after getting corrupted drivers and being malware infested, but trying to tell a customer how to do it? Or better yet, teaching a tech who English is a second language and doesn't even own a computer to help a customer on this issue? Reinstall is far much simpler.

    I really think this is what makes tech support so bad. Not only do you have to know how to do the job, you also have to act as a teacher. Atleast I got a free Windows 98 OEM disk during my 6 month jaunt there.

  54. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's so, like WOW, and the scrolley desktop too, totally wow and completely different from the other scrolley 3d desktops in Suns Java desktop.

    And the features, IT PROTECTS MY DIGITAL CONTENT! Wow, it stops thieves stealing my content as it goes from my computer to my video display, Wow, totally Wow.

    Wow, it has desktop search, right there, built in, no need to download something or anything, WOW!

    And the 5th best anti-virus, there in the package, WOW!

    It even has .NET run time installed already, no need to go downloading another 80GB .NEt install so I can run, erm, Nasa world map thingy. The power of .NET is just so thrusting, wow, I'm totally jizzing in my Zune right now.

  55. Bandwagon Developers! by starglider29a · · Score: 1
    Part of the "What else is there?" is on the heads of developers. Many places of business use applications that were only written for Windows, and they are necessary for their business. I cite "Xactimate" for insurance estimation. It's not the OS that locks them in, it's the applications that don't exist on another platform.

    And I am as guilty as anyone. As a Mac User, I have not written ONE LINE of Mac Code. I have REAL Basic on my machine, but have I used it? No...

    We as a developer community need to do one of three things:
    1. Find a way to write cross-platform (and use it)
    2. Find a way to abstract or emulate other OS's
    3. Bow to Redmond until they implode
    1. Re:Bandwagon Developers! by mgiuca · · Score: 1

      1. Find a way to write cross-platform (and use it)
      Well there are 2 ways to write cross-platform.

      One is the C way - write code which is as general as possible, and then write loads of extra code to make it work on each system. It's difficult and time-consuming and costly, but it's my preferred way because you end up with a product which is tested and works natively on each platform. Of course, cross-platform libraries which have been written this way (eg. SDL, wxWidgets, etc) are a great boon because it means the code you write (which uses these libraries) can just use them and compile on any platform.

      The second way is the Java way - the "write once, run anywhere". Which is a commendable notion but has issues - mostly due to the fact you're really running on an abstract machine. Still, if it means I can run software on whatever I want, then I salute it.

      Oh, and the third way is the way of the web: writing web apps that run on browsers which are not IE! Obviously this doesn't work for desktop apps, but it's good for certain uses.

      2. Find a way to abstract or emulate other OS's
      I think this is the best way to go - WINE. I don't really want to have to *emulate* Windows, but if we can abstract its API (ie. WINE) then we win. Everything is then cross platform (at least all the windows software - ironically this would make writing Windows software the most cross platform way to do it other than Java).

      3. Bow to Redmond until they implode
      I don't see the logic...

      Anyway I think both #1 and #2 are important - #1 is for all developers, and #2 is a general solution which the open source community can do without mass support from the general development community.
  56. Re:God I remember this hell. WinModem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people are twats like this when it comes to support. My hard drive is dying on a toshiba laptop I have that is still in warenty and they are trying to force me to re-install windows. I don't even use windows! but when I did go on it (Its still on a partition of that drive) the problem was there too, and when accessing the HD through a live CD I have the same problem... so obviously nothing to do with the OS. But thats not enough to tell support people. I dispair.

  57. This computer geek only uses old junk. by Archeopteryx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I pride myself on keeping old machines happily doing the day-to-day work of my business. My OS choices;

    Linux (Debian)
    MacOS-X
    Windows 2000

    And I see zero reason to upgrade.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re:This computer geek only uses old junk. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      You may want to upgrade. Mac OS-X.3 has some stability improvements over version X. In fact, isn't the upgrade to X.1 free?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  58. Re:Slowly but sure by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

    But Apple computers wasn't successful. Apple, Inc. the ipod/itunes company is.

  59. What else is there? Not much by microcars · · Score: 1
    all it takes it for someone to NOT be able to use some ActiveX feature and they won't be using a Mac or anything else.

    All the Realtors I know (except my wife) use Windows because there is always one web-based thing they use or some Program they bought that NEEDS ActiveX or IE to function at all. I can work around it, but they can't. A computer is just a tool for them.

    Another client wants a security webcam up on his website, but the software that runs the security system needs ActiveX.
    Other than that, there is no reason for him to use Windows.
    But if he can't view his Securitycam thingie on the Intarweb, he'll stick with Windows forever.

    None of these people have a good reason to go out and upgrade to VISTA, but when their current computer goes kaput, they will be trotting out to Best Buy to get the cheapest piece of junk they can find to replace it. I don't know when OEMs will stop shipping new computers with XP on them though.

    Eventually most all of them WILL be using VISTA, like it or not.

    --
    I like microcars
  60. $40 will do it by davegust · · Score: 1

    My $40 GeForce 6200 runs Aero just fine.

  61. Re:The good news is by drooling-dog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are now more Vista users than there are Linsux/Open Sores users. There are also more idiots than geniuses, so I'm not exactly sure what you think you're proving there...
  62. Implications by surfcow · · Score: 1

    Lots of people will keep their hardware and not switch to Vista. Lots of people will get new hardware with Vista. And a fair number of Windows users will say "screw this" and buy a Mac. Looks like an excellent year for Apple and Dell.

  63. What's vista worth if router has default login by PharmerWithTractor · · Score: 1

    What's vista worth, if you are using your router with the default login. Any script kiddie can now do some drive-by pharming and redirect your bank account.

  64. Of course, this is Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who am I kidding? I can just post old, clichéd jokes instead.
    No one will be the wiser! :-)

    Post bad DOS^WVista jokes to Slashdot?
    [ Abort ] [ Retry ] [ Fail ]
    *click*

  65. Screw Aero .... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    Get native OpenGL support 3d desktop with Beryl:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beryl_(window_manager )

    Has very little impact on system performance if you
    have a mediocre video card that supports open GL.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Screw Aero .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree, Debian rocks. I do have dual-boot with WinXP for games that I own that probably won't run on Vista anyway. When XP is totally outdated, I'll buy a game console like the Wii and fdisk my xp partition... because buying a whole new computer just so Vista will run when the one I have works just fine is a waste of time and money.

  66. why upgrade? by Secwind · · Score: 1

    there's no reason to get vista so fast yet. XP is still function and it cost a fortune to upgrade just for a little better lookat most. I'll stick w/ my window blind.

  67. Vista support confusion -- huh? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One source at a major OEM who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the real issue is that OEMs are still not sure which PCs are really ready to support Vista, and which PCs aren't..

    Huh? MS has already released recommended specs.

    It ran quite well on my old P4 2.6 GHz, 1 GB RAM and Geforce 6600 GT...

    That is, far below what e.g. Dell has sold the past few years.
    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Vista support confusion -- huh? by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Umm.. may I just point out the irony of your sig compared to the subject of your post? You disagree with DRM, yet you purchased Vista, which is the biggest vehicle to take the control of your hardware out of your hands via DRM?

    2. Re:Vista support confusion -- huh? by mrpaco18 · · Score: 1

      "You disagree with DRM, yet you purchased Vista..."

      Maybe I missed something, but where in Jugalator's comment does it say anything about having purchased Vista?

      "Huh? MS has already released recommended specs.
      It ran quite well on my old P4 2.6 GHz, 1 GB RAM and Geforce 6600 GT...
      That is, far below what e.g. Dell has sold the past few years."

      It's definitely possible that he/she used a free (as in beer) RC build or even got the damned thing off of The Pirate Bay. Use != purchased.

  68. I smell a class action lawsuit by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    Well, I do. Can't you smell it? It must be my 6th or perhaps even 7th sense.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  69. Re:The good news is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more Vista users than there are Linsux/Open Sores users... more idiots than geniuses, so I'm not exactly sure what you think you're proving there...

    Correlation, my good man, correlation!

  70. Advice From a Battle-Scarred Upgrade Veteran by Malkin · · Score: 5, Informative

    They are doing everyone a big favor. Vista's upgrade process is absolutely not robust enough yet for the average consumer.

    Last weekend, I spent two days upgrading to Vista on a machine that was just purchased in October. I did succeed in the end, but it was not without a considerable amount of hair-pulling.

    The essential problem is that if ANYTHING goes wrong, the upgrade suddenly becomes a non-consumer-friendly train wreck. The most painful thing is that there are any number of small hardware problems that can cause the boot to blue screen. If the boot blue screens, Vista tries to boot again. That is, you end up in a boot-loop. The blue screen does not stay up long enough to read it. So, anyone debugging the problem needs to learn about the F8 menu, where they can request that the machine not reboot on boot failure. THIS time. Then, you have to look at the blue screen, and hope that it's something that'll give you SOME clue as to what's wrong. After all...

    IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL ...could mean, oh, your audio hardware is having some issue, or it could just mean you have 4GB of RAM (See KB929777), or any number of other things.

    Vista WILL NOT FINISH INSTALLING until you have done at least one clean non-Safe-Mode boot. However, it WILL NOT allow you to use Safe Mode until it has finished installing. So, there is no way to remedy any problems (short of yanking hardware out of your machine) unless you boot off of the install DVD, and go into the command line tool there. However, you cannot get to the command line tool directly. You have to ask for it to do a Repair first. However, Repair hangs on some machines. (Man, I wish I was making this up.) So, you may have to cancel out of Repair, just to get to the command line.

    None of the three distinct problems that were preventing my upgrade were detected at all by the tool that was supposed to determine if my machine was Vista compatible. Not a single one of them. So, I had no idea where to start looking for problems.

    Okay, now imagine your typical first-level tech trying to guide a consumer through this swamp.

    They can't. This is not something that can be realistically handled by first-level customer support. Moreover, the "just do a clean install" line that Microsoft has been feeding to anyone who contacts tech support REALLY isn't going to fly with people who were told their machines would be ready for a Vista upgrade when it became available. They have already been using their machines, and they expect a smooth upgrade -- not a clean install.

    These companies have a vested interest in making sure that the Vista upgrade process is not going to blow up in the faces of their customers. Because their equipment is very consistent, they face a situation where it's either going to be a disaster for everyone, or it's going to run smoothly for almost everyone. The stakes are very high for them to get this one right. The cost of botching it up will be phenomenal. So, give them some time. Let them get this one right. Or, their poor customers are going to find yourself with your machine torn apart all over the floor, gnashing and wailing, like I was. Upgrades should never be this hard.

    1. Re:Advice From a Battle-Scarred Upgrade Veteran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what you're saying is that everyone who bought a computer with a guaranteed upgrade can take their vendor to court for a refund. Right? Taking money out of my pocket and then saying it's not ready yet is a strange way of "doing me a favor".

  71. will create jobs by rajafarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah, I see now what Microsoft meant when they said that Vista would create over 100,000 new jobs in the US and in Europe: Support desk jobs for the resellers.

    1. Re: will create jobs by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Modded as funny, but probably true. In the past we had relatively simple tools which people fully understood to accomplish basic tasks; now we have very complicated tools which people don't fully understand to accomplish the same basic tasks.

      Now, operating and maintaining the tools are the focus of a disproportionate amount of energy and effort. So, yes, there's a job creation element, it's just that most people aren't being more effective with the high-powered tools (unless we count the "efficiency" of faster communications between morons).

  72. An OEM-bastardised version of an OS? by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    Who would want such a thing?

  73. Advice From a Battle-Scarred Hard Drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well you've just illustrated why I keep all of my hard drives. Want to try a new OS? Yank the old ones (or disconnect them) and put in the spare. After that either the install works or it doesn't. If it does then I dual-boot from either the new (Vista) or the old (XP). Benefits of the new, while I still have my safety net. It's the same thing I did when I first tried Linux.

  74. All of that was already available on XP by bogie · · Score: 1

    "UI prettiness"
    Lots of 3rd party companies like Stardock already do this.

    "indexed searching"
    Use google Desktop search or Windows Desktop Search

    "an attempt at proper admin"
    That's been available forever on 2k/XP. Guess what? Vendors are STILL forcing you to run things a admin. I guess kudos to MS for finally not giving root access to every user *sigh*.

    "quick access mini-apps"
    Google desktop search, whatever-task-toolbar from whoever. Been there done that.

    "more included applications"
    All of the big apps like WMP 11, IE7, etc are available for XP. There are free alternatives for many of the other things. Picasa owns Windows Photo Gallery. The other apps fall into the "nice to have something" category vs being legitimate Ilife competitors.

    "parental controls"
    Good idea, we'll see how well vendors support it.

    "speech recognition"
    Wider adoption is IMHO a good thing but A) 99% of people have zero interest in it, B) the other 1% saw that disasterous demonstration of Vista's speech recognition and assume it sucks and will never use it.

    "better encryption integration/ease of use"
    Worthless for the general public because only certain high-end versions of Vista come with it. Ease of use is like learning a new OS. Microsoft has gone to great lengths to complicate and obfuscate things that you could do in two clicks on XP. Shifting things around for the hell of it does not = making it easier. Network Center? Need I say more?

    Overall as I'll repeat again, as Vista stands right now it remains for now an expensive solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Benchmarks show it runs anywhere from 5-50% slower than XP for general tasks http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista /
    and Nvidia users are simply screwed when it comes to Vista. In short the performance is just terrible considering the insane processing power we have available these days, Oh and if you have anything more than 512MB of ram DON'T use readyboost you'll just slow your PC down.

    Post SP1 Vista will finally be an OS worth upgrading to, but that's still quite a way off and consumers are IMHO much better off sticking with XP. By then Vienna will be out so why bother?

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:All of that was already available on XP by dch24 · · Score: 1

      Post SP1 Vista will finally be an OS worth upgrading to, but that's still quite a way off and consumers are IMHO much better off sticking with XP. By then Vienna will be out so why bother?
      Because Microsoft will announce the End of Life (EOL) for XP. And Vienna will be the same nightmare Vista is now.

      Vendor Lock-In
  75. Nothing to see here by Jherico · · Score: 1

    I don't know for certain about HP or Toshiba or the others, but Dell EXCPLICITLY states on their web site that DVD's for the upgrade will go out 4-8 weeks after Vista is available. Read the god damned fine print.

    --

    Jherico

    What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  76. Is this a problem? by ukemike · · Score: 1

    So if you're smart enough to read the box, why would you buy Vista for an upgrade on a machine that's more than a year old and can't run it?


    Actually I haven't figured out ONE good reason to go with Vista regardless of what hardware you have. Could someone clue me in?

    If there was a big poisonous black cloud on the horizon it would be good news if you learned that it was delayed until April. I can't figure out how this is any different. Signed - a satisfied XP user who will be migrating to Apple and/or Linux.
    --
    -- QED
  77. Good! by xant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Upgrade Versions of Vista are Poison.

    Of course, this has always been true of Windows Upgrade versions, but not to the extent of Vista.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  78. Re:Slowly but sure by Checkmait · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please, tell me how Vista is good?!? I mean, (aside from the networking stack), all you get is XP+DRM+bugfixes and a new UI (although that is still clumsy).

    Oh, and did I mention that driver revocation was put into effect? So when Microsoft finds out your brand-new $400 24-inch LCD is "leaking" precious content, goodbye $400 monitor!! Plus, you're only allowed one major hardware switch...

    OK, so put in perspective for a university, assume you upgrade your hardware every five years and have a standard monitor, graphics card, etc. Suddenly, some hacker somewhere breaks into that graphics card somewhere in the world and Microsoft finds out about it. Poof! All of your graphics cards are rendered entirely useless, because Microsoft can't have them leaking the precious "premium content," even if millions of people will no longer have functional cards.

    The driver revocation was why I switched to Linux (and have never regretted it).

    And finally, even if you get a VERY good academic price (let's say something entirely absurd, like $20/copy), you are still spending $20x120=$2400 on the OS alone for upgrades (not to mention the new hardware).

    --
    "All you need is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." -- Mark Twain
  79. Complalin to your Attorney General by gadlaw · · Score: 1

    Without complaints they can't get these guys who run these 'upgrade' scams and 'rebate' scams on people. Document everything exactly and when you get the run around, the rebate in a name that's a bad variation of your name, a 'cancelled' upgrade based on alleged imput from you - you can complain to your state attorney general. These guys love cases like that, it makes them famous and gets the crooked bastards. Remember, the scam artists like Microsoft are counting on you just taking it in and not doing anything about it.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  80. Re:Slowly but sure by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    I think it's safe to say that while OSX is not going to be the dominant os any time soon apple still sells enough desktops to be considered a success.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  81. Backwards - Vista OK for corporate - XP for home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Vista may be "ok" for home users, but definitely not for the corporate world.


    I think you have that backwards. Even Microsoft admits that XP security is second rate compared to Vista and MacOS.


    Vista is *exactly* what corporate IT needs rather than XP which was never really appropriate for corporate use ever.


    XP is better in the home environments where games still require it and are proving to be pretty unstable on Vista.

  82. Is it an open source or binary driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's an open source one I'll help you debug it. I've had similar experiences with Linux drivers in the past; but those all seem to be working at this point. If it's just a binary driver, I guess your SOL if you go with a OS vendor crappy enough to supply a driver that crashes your systems.

    1. Re:Is it an open source or binary driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the OP can trust that promises of help with driver development from Anonymous Coward can be taken seriously and aren't just rhetorical arguments in favour of the open source "cause".

  83. One word: SECURITY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XP security is a joke and even Microsoft now admits it. While Vista isn't perfect, it's come a long way from the fiasco they had before.

    If you do any e-commerce at all, you want either Vista or OSX or Linux.

  84. Bought a laptop... by DegradingLight · · Score: 1

    I just bought a laptop from Dell last night. I WISH they offered XP, because they only had Vista as an operating system choice. I would have rather taken no operating system and installed my own. Me, like many customers who refuse to upgrade, find their hardware incompatible with Vista (Dell no longer offered the integrated Audigy card I wanted and I was forced to settle with generic integrated sound because of compatibility issues with the audigy's drivers.)

  85. looking in the wrong place by Tharkban · · Score: 1

    In general you don't buy software for linux.

    So of course you won't find software for linux on amazon. You'll find it on sourceforge or using apt-get. Even looking in the CNR warehouse, most of the programs are free (most of them are the standard open source projects).

    --
    Tharkban (It is a signature after all)
    1. Re:looking in the wrong place by westlake · · Score: 0, Troll
      In general you don't buy software for linux.
      So of course you won't find software for linux on amazon. You'll find it on sourceforge or using apt-get. Even looking in the CNR warehouse, most of the programs are free (most of them are the standard open source projects).

      The problem is that the warehouse looks pretty empty when you are shopping for the home.

      You want to know why Windows remains the dominant OS in this market? Then you need to know what the middle class is looking for in software. You need know why users ignore the FOSS alternative ---if it exists---and if they can find it.

  86. Re:Backwards - Vista OK for corporate - XP for hom by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Based on your comment, I truly can't tell if it's just satire, or you're being bloody serious!

    Right now, Vista is very bad for the corporate world being they often run custom web applications. Some of these applications haven't been updated yet to handle IE7. Then, you have applications that run on .Net. I've heard numerous bad things about these apps running on Vista too. Why? I don't know; I'm not a programmer. I'm only telling you based on personal experience with my clients.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Vista will never be the trusted successor to XP, but right now, it's too soon to be recommending this new OS.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  87. Please explain this to me: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these people saying Dell or whoever is not acknowledging their upgrade. Please explain to me why you're not, every single one of you, going to small claims court to get your $200 back? Or whatever the retail price of whatever version of Vista you got.

  88. Re:The good news is by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

    I don't even use linsux and yet know about shit like that. I thought as much...
  89. Re:God I remember this hell. WinModem! by karnal · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the other things that makes tech support bad is that you're constantly understaffed, yet your Boss may be the type to want you to "keep good relations."

    I have had stints with my company doing PC support - and even though I can still do it, I don't want anything to do with it. Why? Well, the end users are nice enough, but when you have 2 people to 1000, it kinda sucks when things start piling on.... I'm talking repairs, deployment, fixes AND moves, adds, changes (network and phone) as well.

    That's why PC support sucks. They'll cut it down just to the point that someone will quit, and then trim no further. All the while the users are complaining that they didn't get their equipment in a reasonable time etc - but they won't pony up the $$ for another tech because "we're incompetent (sp?)" I never want another piece of doing computer tech work.

    --
    Karnal
  90. question nobody really ever answers on vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting as Anonymous -- because I cannot remember my login.

    With XP I remember hearing about a hack that made XP Home act like XP Pro. I keep wondering once XP is not readily available (stick with it for now...) would it be possible to buy on Vista Home Basic Upgrade at between $89-99 -- do the double install trick to get a full/clean install and then activate that and use hacks or add-ons to get the Premium or Ultimate functionality without having to allow MS to rape your wallet? Or has MS already said somewhere that they are going to disallow the double install trick at some point? If what I suggest works at least MS would not get as much money from everybody and you would still get some updates because it would be a Home Basic version that you paid for...

  91. Re:The good news is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You knew what, that anyone involved in open-sores can't even program their way out of a proverbial paper bag? Funny thing is there are more problems with open-sores shit compared to closed-source yet you fucktards compare firefux to Vista. Vista is an operating system. But since you fucktards want to compare the two, then it is funny that the GIMP has been in beta status longer than XP has been out, yet Paint Shop Pro 7 has features that has been missing in the Gimp. Oh wait, you bitches will blame Bill Gates and Microsoft somehow. Face it open-sores just has a shitty track record.

    The only reason why linsux is 'secure' is because you script-kiddies don't want your improperly written OS to look bad.

  92. Re:What else is there? Not much by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    OEMs stopped shipping new computers with XP a few days before Vista was released. There were a few days when big-box computer stores had no MS computers on the shelves because Vista would be released later that week!
    You cannot get OEM XP-computers from large stores now--just Vista, OSX, or FreeDOS.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  93. Re:The HaHa Tag? by Teresita · · Score: 1

    If HaHa is a tag for every story on Microsoft, then what is the tag for a story on Linux?

    It is NeenerNeener.

  94. Vista not ready for the desktop? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    What bothers me is the lack of drivers and support for older hardware. The OS is supposed to support the hardware, not the other way around. Maybe Vista will be ready for desktop use in two or three years, but for now, I'll pass.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Vista not ready for the desktop? by Shados · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that what you said sounds frighteningly close to what people say (hell, i'm one of em) against Linux being ready for the desktop. I don't know if its intentional or not, but I guess typical slashdotters should rejoice.

  95. (Offtopic) by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "(Dell no longer offered the integrated Audigy card I wanted and I was forced to settle with generic integrated sound because of compatibility issues with the audigy's drivers.)"

    Dell's "integrated Audigy card" is actually the integrated SigmaTel card you ended up with, plus EAX software from Creative. In reality the SigmaTel is the best integrated sound card I've ever used (and I'm a musician doing audio engineer work on the side), easily rivaling the PCMCIA Audigy 2ZS I was using on my last laptop. If you don't need the useless echo and reverb effects EAX brings, you won't miss not having an "Audigy" in your laptop.

    1. Re:(Offtopic) by DegradingLight · · Score: 1

      Okay, maybe I don't feel so bad about the sound card, (I want an m-audio card that I can plug various components in like midi anyways. I'm a musician too.) However for the video card, I was still left to choose between integrated video or the NVIDIA GeForce 7400. A few months ago when they gave one the option to have XP installed on the laptop, the list of video cards to choose from wasn't this pitiful. *Sigh* It's just a headache to know my choices are limited to parts only compatible with an OS that I won't even use on the laptop!

  96. GeekSquad! by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    Good thing I bought mine at BestBuy, GeekSquad will fix it!!

  97. Re:Slowly but sure by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

    I think maybe you are being a little alarmist. Reading through all the documentation on DRM in vista, they are not about to outright block your $400 LCD panel from functioning, as you hinted, merely degrade the quality of the video only while playing high definition content, and even then only if certain conditions are present. Driver revocation one would assume, would only be for as long as it takes the drivers to get corrected. Don't get me wrong, it's still a shitty implementation, but not as bad as you make it sound.

  98. Re:It's been a major pain to get the upgrade so fa by chamont · · Score: 1

    Absolutely.

    I bought XP thinking ... free upgrade to Vista, why wait. What a mistake.

    Modus/Microsoft are a nightmare. I could have bought Vista straight out for the same price and not had the "upgrade an existing system only" bullshit. That's assuming I even end up getting a copy of my Vista upgrade CD some time in April, if it ever does arrive. Modus' web site is an absolute joke, it's down often, and the "check on your order" is stuck in some infinite time warp which never updates, never changes, and gives no actual information whatsoever. JOKE. Absolute joke.

    I will NEVER, never ever buy any Microsoft upgrade again. Microsoft can blame Modus all they want, but we know who is responsible for this. They farmed this job out to the lowest bidder, and consumers suffer. When will we learn.

    The only way to painlessly run Microsoft products is to pirate them.

  99. Re:What else is there? Not much by mgiuca · · Score: 1

    Well that's the sad thing. About 98% of people who get Vista will need nothing besides what was already in XP. Yet they'll get Vista anyway - not even because they're sheep and they're told to, but because they were literally forced to. It's a completely virtual market. I don't know why Microsoft don't just release a new OS every year with a new logo, it would be just as effective.

  100. Re:Slowly but sure by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "merely degrade the quality of the video only while playing high definition content"

    God forbid I should watch HD content in HD on my HD monitor because Microsoft gets wind of hacked firmware in Romania.

    "Baby Monitor" would be a good codename for their next OS, since they missed it this time around. Or perhaps "Leash."

  101. ultimate is out-of-stock at the company store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At the Microsoft company store, they have been out of vista ultimate for about week or so. :/ No, I'm not kidding.

    --
    RandomAndInteresting.com - defending the world from stupidity since 1979

  102. Re:Slowly but sure by Checkmait · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this seems pesimistic, but remember that not many companies are willing to pick up three or four-year old drivers and fix them. They prefer to focus on the new stuff. And considering that most of the world does not use top-of-the-line video cards or monitors....

    --
    "All you need is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." -- Mark Twain
  103. Re:It's been a major pain to get the upgrade so fa by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    LOL!

    Last night, after all of these comments, I finally got my confirmation on the order.

    Coincidence? :-D

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  104. Major Bug in Vista OEM renaming folders on shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something to be wary of with regards to Vista OEM installations is that there are bugs with the way it renames folders and files on network shares. This results in Vista leaving items such as "New Folder" and "New Text Document". Apparently the OEMs are pointing the finger at Microsoft and Microsoft are pointing the finger back at OEMs. There is more info here: http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx? PostID=522208&SiteID=17&PageID=1

  105. Re:really? (Simple Solution to your problem) by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    1. Don't call dell. Use the online chat. It's faster and you don't have to strain with accents that you can't understand.

    2. Before you begin the chat pull the Hard drive from the laptop and then run a hard drive diagnostic. Obviously it will fail. You'll have a nice hard drive not found error code to give to the dell tech. That will get you a replacement hard drive shipped. When they ship the drive they will ship the software to reinstall.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  106. No Leap support on IPW2200 by growse · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, I couldn't get the thinkvantage network profile utility to even install under vista ("Wrong plaform found") and the changelog indicates that there are no Cisco extensions (LEAP) implemented in the vista versions.

    They're close, but lets not say everything is properly supported yet.

    --
    There is nothing interesting going on at my blog