Slashdot Mirror


Captain America Dead at 66

jas_public writes to mention ABC news is reporting that comic book super hero Captain America has apparently tackled his last mission. "It ends a long run for the stars-and-stripes-wearing character, created in 1941 to incarnate patriotic feeling during World War II. Over the years, an estimated 210 million copies of "Captain America" comic books, published by New York-based Marvel Entertainment Inc., have been sold in a total of 75 countries. But resurrections are not unknown in the world of comics, and Marvel Entertainment editor in chief Joe Quesada said a Captain America comeback wasn't impossible."

327 comments

  1. Dead at 66? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dead at 66?

    According to the Captain America Wikipedia page (far more in depth than the encyclopedia britannica page I might add!), Steve Rogers was born on July 4, 1917 in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, New York City, to Irish immigrants Sarah and Joseph Rogers.

    Anyway, lets hope this original & innovative storyline is as lucrative as the "death of Superman" thing DC ran a while back.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Dead at 66? by Omeger · · Score: 2, Informative

      He's been around (as a character) for 66 years, not him being alive (as a person) for 66 years.

    2. Re:Dead at 66? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I was more than a Marvel than a DC man so you'll have to pardon my ignorance, but didn't DC do a big reality-shifting relignment of all their stories at one point?

      I agree that this sounds suspiciously like an attempt to temporarily 'kill' a major character to boost sales. I just hope that his ressurection is better thought out than Spock's.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Dead at 66? by revlayle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Crisis on Infinite Earths

      followed up by "Zero Hour" and "Infinite Crisis"

      Give it a couple more decades and we will also probably get:
      * Infinite Zero Hour * Zero Crisis Infinity * Earth Hour Zero * Crisis on Zero Earths

    4. Re:Dead at 66? by brouski · · Score: 1

      DC has done this on more than one occasion. The story you're most likely thinking of is Crisis on Infinite Earths.

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    5. Re:Dead at 66? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      'Fraid not.

      I, like you, preferred Marvel over DC. Though I've been out of comics for several decades now, from time to time, I do dip back in. It is clear to me that Marvel today is where DC was.

      Marvel's characters are getting old and stale at a time when DC seems to be invigorating their characters with new life. Hell, they even had me reading Green Lantern again despite bringing Hal Jordan back. (Hey, DC ASS-HOLES! Bring back Barry Allen! And you can forget that shit about Iris Allen being from the future! Nightwing? WTF? Guess I'm too old school.)

      This whole "Civil War" thing sounds like a weak attempt to drum up extended sales to counter that weekly thing DC was scheduled to do. I think Cap's death is an attempt to revitalize the character with a New and improved Cap; though they've tried that before too; Nomad among others.

      If we're lucky, it's real and they've finally decided to retire this character. I doubt it. The only Marvel characters that seemed to ever stay dead were Baron Zemo from "The Avengers" and "The Masked Marauder" from Daredevil.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    6. Re:Dead at 66? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He's been around (as a character) for 66 years, not him being alive (as a person) for 66 years.

      Yes, I gathered that. Dead at X, tends to mean dead at X years old tho.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    7. Re:Dead at 66? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention Infinite Hour: Earth, which I experienced recently in the form of a mandatory Lead Paint Safety class...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:Dead at 66? by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's actually a fictional character - not a real guy. When a newspaper runs a "happy birthday" column for Mickey Mouse, they tend to calculate his age based on his first appearance - not his first appearance plus how old they think he was in his first appearance.

    9. Re:Dead at 66? by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      You bastards! You killed Cap!

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    10. Re:Dead at 66? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      It is clear to me that Marvel today is where DC was.

      Agreed. As a former Marvel Zombie myself, It's actually a bit of a shock to finding DC's stuff a lot more interesting and cutting-edge (well, as cutting edge as one of the major publishers can be, at any rate.)

      Further, the current Marvel "Civil War" storyline was worse than bad. Despite a few interesting subplots, the whole thing's been a dull and plodding affair, which is weird, as Marvel used to be pretty good when it came to major crossovers like this.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    11. Re:Dead at 66? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just be glad you're not [apparently] any kind of manager living in California, or you'd have to take two hours of sexual harassment sensitivity training every two years. Except here it's been twice in 1.5 years... two times too many. I did learn one interesting thing this last time, though; it's harassment if you're standing "over" a woman (like leaning over her) because it's threatening or something. But it's not harassment if you stand over a man, regardless of your gender. What I love most about sexual harassment law is that it's so fucking stupid...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Dead at 66? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      I think that Zemo is back. They even brought back the Red Skull after 10 or 15 years.

    13. Re:Dead at 66? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn spoiler

    14. Re:Dead at 66? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I think that Zemo is back. They even brought back the Red Skull after 10 or 15 years.
      I thought the line was "Only Bucky stays dead..."
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    15. Re:Dead at 66? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Bucky come back as the 'Winter Soldier'?

    16. Re:Dead at 66? by gonzo67 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You must have had a bad instructor. As someone who teaches this subject (Sexual Harassment Prevention) among other related topics, I must say that if done properly, the students appreciate the course and learn something new each time. And I perform this as part of my duties in the military....including while deployed!

    17. Re:Dead at 66? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's actually a fictional character - not a real guy.

      Damn it! Really?

      Next you're going to be telling me the Super soldier serum isn't real either :-(

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    18. Re:Dead at 66? by trenien · · Score: 1

      They resurected him a few months back, the storyline being he's been around for we don't know how many years (but staying in the shadows as some kind of super ninja/spy)

    19. Re:Dead at 66? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is like not being descrimination to require that I work 18 hours on a sunday well into the night because it is a "bad" neighborhood. Meanwhile, legally she should get the same pay and benefits because there is "no difference" between us. (Okay so why do is she less qualified when it comes to conversion work on the weekend and late at night?)

      This happened a decade or more ago at a different company during a conversion to a new computer).

      Things are not fair yet- currently they are still in the "screw the guys" period. I believe it will eventually even out.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    20. Re:Dead at 66? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're not counting the time he spent frozen in the north pole.

    21. Re:Dead at 66? by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 1

      Hey - you're the one arguing that they should have cited his real age rather than the date of first appearance [which is standard operating procedure for fictional characters].

    22. Re:Dead at 66? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      What I love most about sexual harassment law is that it's so fucking stupid... - Last words of Ted Bundy
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    23. Re:Dead at 66? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      gonzo67, I respect your service to our country. Thank you.

    24. Re:Dead at 66? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Hey - you're the one arguing that they should have cited his real age rather than the date of first appearance [which is standard operating procedure for fictional characters].

      Incorrect.

      My comment was aimed at the headline - I wouldn't have had a problem with "Dead after 66 years" or some other wording more appropriate for a fictional character.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    25. Re:Dead at 66? by numbski · · Score: 1

      Meh, if Capcom has anything to say about it, we'll still have US Agent walking around...

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    26. Re:Dead at 66? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Was he the serial killer or the sitcom character?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    27. Re:Dead at 66? by Mark+J+Tilford · · Score: 1

      The version I heard (called "The Bucky Clause") was "Nobody stays dead in comics, except for Bucky, Uncle Ben, and Jason Todd."

      --
      -----------
      100% pure freak
    28. Re:Dead at 66? by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he was in suspended animation (frozen in an iceberg) for 20 years.... or was it 40?

    29. Re:Dead at 66? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude, but you're not getting screwed because you're a guy... it's because you're illiterate. That grammar is so bad it made my eyes bleed.

      Oh, and women make 70% of what men make for the same work. Check your statistics before you start spouting off about men being treated unfairly in the work place.

    30. Re:Dead at 66? by Esoteric+Moniker · · Score: 1

      Gwen Stacey?

      --

      man RTFM
      No manual entry for RTFM.
    31. Re:Dead at 66? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      TV was Al Bundy.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    32. Re:Dead at 66? by tezbobobo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Warning: Explicit Material in links

      Military
      Sexual
      Harassment
      Prevention
      Program

    33. Re:Dead at 66? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Man, you should see a doctor about that.

      Two misspellings and no grammar warnings.

      And this is Slashdot- not a grammar primer.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    34. Re:Dead at 66? by franksands · · Score: 1

      Well, she didn't come back per se, but there was a story of a daughter of Gwen with the *green goblin*. Obviously, the daughter was pratically the twin sister of Gwen, so I would count as a come back with the "no-I-am-actually-her-daughter" ending.

    35. Re:Dead at 66? by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Heh. Uncle Ben is back in one of the lastest Spider Man threads, although it looks like he might be someone coming back from the future.

      M

    36. Re:Dead at 66? by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need a legal lesson. Sexual Harassment/= Rape. Indeed, once physical contact of a sexual nature is made upon another person, you are crossing into the realm of sexual assault. This means you have crossed from a civil-law type issue to a criminal-law type issue. This is also true of yelling obscenities at someone /= Battery (see Assault&Battery). Specifically, I could use every ethnic,racial, religious, gender, etc slur towards you and likely to be able to win any legal case if I were arrested. The moment I touch you in any manner, a legal line has been crossed and my defence in court become increasingly more difficult. Based on your weblink, you are in Oz....and I was deployed with several members of your Armed Forces in the Arabian Gulf. Also got to see some of your entertainers (McClymont sisters were among the them..http://www.dailyexaminer.com.au/localnews/st orydisplay.cfm?storyid=3683573&thesection=localnew s&thesubsection=&thesecondsubsection=) One of the best shows we had....glad they came to visit. Reminded me of my travels to the NT Top End (Darwin to be specific) back in the late 80s...good times....Could use a VB right now!). Your ADF folk were outstanding to work with too...

    37. Re:Dead at 66? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who the asshole is who thinks this post was funny, but it wasn't meant to be. If you served and behaved honorably, I respect you. Ignore the spoiled children who think their techie job is oh so hard.

    38. Re:Dead at 66? by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 1

      "My comment was aimed at the headline - I wouldn't have had a problem with "Dead after 66 years" or some other wording more appropriate for a fictional character."
      Incorrect.

      Your comment was aimed at the person responsible for the headline. I think you're stupid but I don't think you're so stupid that you would address conversations to headlines in stories. But then again...you did think Captain America was a real person.

      Did you escape from Arkham Asylum? [For the record: fictional construct as well.]

    39. Re:Dead at 66? by Mark+J+Tilford · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I heard they brought back Jason Todd & Bucky. But that's how it was classically stated.

      --
      -----------
      100% pure freak
    40. Re:Dead at 66? by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need a lesson in the real world - sexism and sexual abuse is not limited to a legal definition. Regardless of what the law says, rape is sexual harassment. After being a student law at Notre Dame University and having at one stage most of my friends lawyers or wannabes, I've come to realize their insistence on classifying things legally is a hindrance to real world understanding of real issues.

      If you think that military sponsored PD about sexual harassment has nothing to do with the statement, "do not rape Iraqi civilians including minors" then you're fucked in the head. Seriously.

      That said, I agree that the defense forces of both our countries are doing an excellent job, and their reputation is tarnished by a minority.

    41. Re:Dead at 66? by mink · · Score: 1

      There was also a story involving a clone and the High Evolutionary.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    42. Re:Dead at 66? by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      It is not a hinderance if you know WHY legal definitions are used. Sexual Harassment is a CIVIL law issue. This means there is not a CRIMINAL aspect to the behaviour. Indeed, based on the typical cat calls seen at any spring break location, many of our population aged 18-30 woudl be in jail if otherwise. RAPE and SEXUAL ASSAULT are CRIMINAL law issue. This means you can go to jail. Granted, the bahaviour of an idiot who sexually harasses someone at their workplace (becuase the law requires an employment connection of some type), is more likely to proceed on the continuum to the criminal realm of sexual assault/rape than one who does not. The difference is (as I already pointed out) the same as the difference between yelling obscenities at someone and actually striking them. The military, if you don't know, has courses about Sexual Assault Prevention that are SEPERATE from the Sexual Harassment Prevention courses. I also think the links given had NOTHING to do with sexual harassment and everything to do with trying to blame the WHOLE military for the criminal behaviour of a few. The same way labelling all geeks who play violent computer games as being the same as the Columbine shooters. One may empathize with them, but the fact is, they took their actions beyond the acceptable limits whereas most geeks who like violent video/computer games do not go that far. In fact, I would "Do not rape." (no qualifiers like "Iraqi civlians" needed) is something that should not have to be said, as hopefully society has taught that lesson already. Apparently not. Shame we have to deal with the fact American society failed to do their job first. And, if you hate the war in Iraq (or even the one in Afghanistan or both), go right ahead and hate it. Indeed, I encourage you to contact your elected representative and tell them you wish to see the military brought home ASAP.

    43. Re:Dead at 66? by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Sure, but I'm saying that the law artificially and arbitarily decides on these matters and that sexual harrassment and sexual assualt are both offences on the same continuum.One is simply more severe than the other.

      Secondly, do not put words in my mouth, as I said NOTHING about want the troops to come back home..

      Thirdly, I don't think the columbine shooter is an apt analogy. Perhaps a better one would be shooting a person with a BB gun as opposed to a handgun.

      Finally, Please use HTML or plain text options appropriately.

  2. Lone Gunmen Deja Vu by gambit3 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nice Lone Gunmen-ing the title there, Sherlocks. So much for me being surprised now when I read it.

    1. Re:Lone Gunmen Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nice Lone Gunmen-ing the title there, Sherlocks. So much for me being surprised now when I read it."

      The difference between this and the Lone Gunmen is that this headline is going out to all the news sites. In other words, blame the media, but not Slashdot.

      (Note: Im gonna laugh if the cover says "Captain America Dead!!")

  3. Good morning to you too... by Pacifix · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a fine way to start the day. Log on to the computer and find out Captain America is being killed off? Why don't you shoot my dog too?

    1. Re:Good morning to you too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, the administration can probably send Cheney over to do that for you.

      They're killing America; no reason for Captain America to go on living.

    2. Re:Good morning to you too... by the_humeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't you shoot my dog too?


      Done and done. Would you like to be billed now or later?
    3. Re:Good morning to you too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why don't you shoot my dog too?

      That's next week's issue ;)

    4. Re:Good morning to you too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billed? Seems to me you forgot one important point. He's dead, Jim.

    5. Re:Good morning to you too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly why I have a cat. Cats are tough, and if you come after my cat with a gun, he puts on his Captain America cat-suit, and splits. Neighborhood dogs start barking, and your gun turns on them.

    6. Re:Good morning to you too... by WwWonka · · Score: 0

      That's a fine way to start the day. Log on to the computer and find out Captain America is being killed off? Why don't you shoot my dog too?

      ...he WAS aiming for your dog, but good ole Cap jumped in the way and took the bullet in the name of PETA.

    7. Re:Good morning to you too... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. Better dead than drawn by Rob Leifeld: http://schend.net/images/funny/rob_leifeld.jpg

    8. Re:Good morning to you too... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      Wait, don't tell me!
      You're a doctor aren't you?
      Or could he be a dentist...

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  4. Oh no! by brewstate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now only Jack Bauer Can save us against the evil that confronts the United States.

    1. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain America is dead, but Osama lives.

      Oops, guess we really are losing!

    2. Re:Oh no! by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Jack Baurer is the evil that confronts America.

      Torture, disregard of human rights, and pretty damn stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Oh no! by locust · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah. Because it takes a canadian to save america from terrorism.

    4. Re:Oh no! by brewstate · · Score: 1, Funny

      All from the U.S. Army Handbook :)

    5. Re:Oh no! by Oakey · · Score: 1

      Erm, Sutherland was born in London

      --
      "Dre don't get as high as me.... I'm Cheech and Chong" - Snoop Dogg
    6. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See what happens when the Democrats control Congress?

    7. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not like the Americans are doing any kind of a real job of it.

  5. Captain America dead at 66 by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on cnn. Famed costume advernturer Captain America was found dead in his home at Timely Comics. Even if you are not a comic book fan you probably enjoyed his defeat of the nazis and his relentless persuit of freedom for all americans. Truly an American Icon. He will be missed.

    1. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > Even if you are not a comic book fan you probably enjoyed his defeat of the nazis and his relentless pursuit of freedom for all americans. Truly an American Icon. He will be missed.

      So will America.

      If Captain America is the embodiment of what it means to be American, let the record show that he didn't die because he failed us. He died because we, the Americans, failed him.

    2. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the story line of Civil War where the government wants registration of heroes and Captain America chooses a more libertarian approach by going underground to fight against the Big Brother government, I'd say Marvel is trying to make a point. And I think your post was it: Captain America died because we, the Americans, failed him.

      But you know what: we voted in a new House and Senate who will hopefully change America back to the way I think it should be. How's that for an honest statement.

    3. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But you know what: we voted in a new House and Senate who will hopefully change America back to the way I think it should be. How's that for an honest statement. Heh. Won't happen. They're all the same. Search your feelings, you know it to be true. How much of guardian of freedom was congress between 1954 and 1994? They all suck. We're doomed.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by syrinx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you know what: we voted in a new House and Senate who will hopefully change America back to the way I think it should be.

      You're either an idiot, 10 years old, or just have amnesia. The Democans are just the same as the Republicrats. Politicians are politicians, no matter their letter.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    5. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      But you know what: we voted in a new House and Senate who will hopefully change America back to the way I think it should be. How's that for an honest statement.

      The late, great Bill Hicks said it best:

      I'll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here. "I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs." "I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking." "Hey, wait a minute, there's one guy holding out both puppets!"

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by AusIV · · Score: 1

      But you know what: we voted in a new House and Senate who will hopefully change America back to the way I think it should be. How's that for an honest statement.

      I like to think that's true, but only because the democrats and the republicans will be forced to compromise to accomplish anything for the next couple of years. I don't want to see the democrats running the country any more than I want to see the republicans running it. Compromise is good, but there's been far too little of it lately.

    7. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      "we voted in a new House and Senate" Yeah, you go on believing that if it makes you sleep better ;).

    8. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by Chris+Oz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      He can't have been that great. I mean he never made it past captain. If he had been any good he would have eventually become Admiral America (I assume he was in the navy, the camp out fit seems to be a make it likely). Any way good riddance he was never a match for Admiral Outrageous and his cabin boy Captain Climate.

    9. Re:Captain America dead at 66 by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      At least he got to learn what America was really about before he died:

      Captain America faces his critics.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  6. Clearly by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

    With Captain America dead, the terrorists have won.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Clearly by Who235 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Funny you mention that, since his death is roughly coinciding with the death of our Constitution.

      I think the only right we have left is the one that says they can't quarter soldiers in your house.

      Expect that one to be gone by the end of the year, *sigh* . . .

    2. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Captain America dead, the terrorists have won. Don't worry, it's just a plan to get publicity for Captain America^w^w^w^w^w fool the terrorists, and the Captain will be back when nerds' interest has been revived^w^w^w^w^w the terrorists least expect it.
    3. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you mention that, since his death is roughly coinciding with the death of our Constitution.

      I think the only right we have left is the one that says they can't quarter soldiers in your house.


      As a soldier myself, I have not choice but to quarter at least one soldier in my house!

      Clearly since you are still spouting your bullshit, Freedom of Speech is still alive and well. For that matter, it seems everyone of the bill of rights is still there and protecting us all. I don't see what your problem is.

      (posting anonymously because I don't want to be modded "offtopic" or "troll" for responding to a troll that is being offtopic!)

    4. Re:Clearly by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I think the only right we have left is the one that says they can't quarter soldiers in your house.
      Expect that one to be gone by the end of the year, *sigh* . . .


      Nah, soliders expect better housing than my place nowadays. I could see us "housing" 1-2 soliders, but we don't have the driveway space for a hummer or jeep. No, this is definitely the only one they'd leave want to alone. I really couldn't see the government being that cheap unless we had a war on our homefront. Heck, we have enough hotels/motels that the government/military could just sieze them. My place? The soliders wouldn't want to cram in there...

    5. Re:Clearly by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Funny you mention that, since his death is roughly coinciding with the death of our Constitution.


      I love left-wing hyperbole on Slashdot. It's entertaining. Apparently, our Constitution has "died," OMG!
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    6. Re:Clearly by Who235 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Freedom of Speech is still alive and well. For that matter, it seems everyone of the bill of rights is still there and protecting us all. I don't see what your problem is.

      OK, here's my problem, pal. These are just a few examples, but you get the drift. All of these were uncovered with quick Google searches. There are lots more cases that I'd be happy to share with you, or you could go ahead and look for yourself.

      First Amendment: status - gone

      Second Amendment: status - limited

      Third Amendment: status - Intact!

      Fourth Amendment: status - gone

      Fifth Amendment: status - gone

      I'll stop there for now.

      The only one spouting bullshit here is you, chief.
      Wake the fuck up before it's too late.

      And if you're wondering what this has to do with Captain America - well, it just made me sad, that's all.
    7. Re:Clearly by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly since you are still spouting your bullshit, Freedom of Speech is still alive and well. For that matter, it seems everyone of the bill of rights is still there and protecting us all. I don't see what your problem is.

      The problem is that if you are accused of being a terrorist you can be held more or less indefinitely without legal counsel and without a trial.

      The problem is that senior white house members have actually so much as said that people need to be careful what they say in these times. What? That sounds like it will have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and most especially the press to me.

      The problem is that illegal wiretaps are alive and well.

      The problem is that people are being put on no-fly lists for, as far as anyone can tell, speaking against the actions of the government. Which is pretty clearly a violation of the first amendment.

      I could go on, but it probably wouldn't do any good anyway.

      (posting anonymously because I don't want to be modded "offtopic" or "troll" for responding to a troll that is being offtopic!)

      It's okay, we already know it's because you lack the courage of your convictions. (I can say this without being a hypocrite, of course, because I go ahead and take my lumps.) That's why you're called an Anonymous Coward.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Clearly by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      Nah, soliders expect better housing than my place nowadays

      haven't been to walter reed recently, have you?

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    9. Re:Clearly by harp2812 · · Score: 1

      Thankfully the 21st Amendment is still intact! (We have to keep our priorities straight)

      --
      I've found that nurturing one's Zen nature is vital to dealing with technology. Violence is pretty damn useful too.
    10. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The problem is that if you are accused of being a terrorist you
      >can be held more or less indefinitely without legal counsel and
      >without a trial.

      OK. Name some names. People you actually know, not something you heard or read about.

      >The problem is that senior white house members have actually so much as
      >said that people need to be careful what they say in these times. What?
      >That sounds like it will have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and
      >most especially the press to me.

      Hardly. People protest all the time without being thrown into jail.

      >The problem is that illegal wiretaps are alive and well.

      Gee. All sorts of communications are listened to. The government is the least of your trouble....if they were....which they aren't.

      >The problem is that people are being put on no-fly lists for, as far as anyone
      >can tell, speaking against the actions of the government. Which is pretty
      >clearly a violation of the first amendment.

      Examples?

      >I could go on, but it probably wouldn't do any good anyway.

      Oh, please don't go on, then!

    11. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Amendment: status - gone
      This is the closest to being vaguely truthful and even it is a stretch. No one's right to free speech is being stopped. The article you yourself link to indicates they are not allowing protesters too close to the president. Wow. First Amendment "dead"? I don't think so.

      Second Amendment: status - limited
      There was a temporary, limited ban on assault weapons. It was not renewed when it came back up for vote!

      Third Amendment: status - Intact!
      Great. At least you didn't fly off the handle on this one?!

      Fourth Amendment: status - gone
      Are you aware that these "warrantless" surveillances are once again required to be approved by judges? Just like a surveillance with a warrant...

      Fifth Amendment: status - gone
      Huh? Eminent domain has been an established law for practically ever. Did you even read your own linked article?!? The cases cited are in court now. The constitutional processes are being used as we speak.

      I'll stop there for now.
      You should never have started. Fortunately, or unfortunately, you too have the right to express your free speech/free ignorance.

    12. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Spoiler alert.

      It wasn't the real Captain who was killed. Nick Fury used Life Model Decoys, and he was killed in an early issue. Precedent. Guess what, Cap fans? Marvel is just gaming all the gullible ijits, just like DC did when Superman was 'killed'.

    13. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent poster supplied links and citations.

      It would only be good manners for you to respond in kind.

    14. Re:Clearly by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I think the only right we have left is the one that says they can't quarter soldiers in your house.

      It says:
      No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

      Since the US is almost constantly at "war" (and if it's just the "war" on terror) it would only need a law to allow quartering soldiers in your home to do that without even violating the constitution.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:Clearly by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      information provided by 'The Rape of the American Constitution', by Chuck Shiver, published by Loompanics Unlimited.

      More liberal hyperbole. I love it. Any mention of Hitler yet? You can't leave out Hitler in a hyperbolic, emotional, liberal rant.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    16. Re:Clearly by Who235 · · Score: 1

      Just for the record, man - I am NOT a liberal and I take serious offense to being called one.

      Unless you mean liberal in the Thomas Jefferson classical liberal sense of course, in which case I thank you.

    17. Re:Clearly by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      I was quoting the bottom of the article in your link.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  7. Resonate? by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

    I read about this earlier, and the whole thing bothered me. Supposedly the death of their oldest hero is supposed to "resonate" more with people. I'm trying to figure out how that works when they explicitly state that there's the possibility of a ressurection. Death sort of loses its meaning when you can continually return from it without consequence (see Dragon Ball Z).

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    1. Re:Resonate? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Marvel has killed characters without bringing them back.

      Gwen Stacy, for example.

    2. Re:Resonate? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      But they did bring back Aunt May.

    3. Re:Resonate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. They wouldn't be super heroes if they stayed dead, now would they!?

    4. Re:Resonate? by Genady · · Score: 1

      "Death sort of loses its meaning when you can continually return from it without consequence."

      and THIS is one big reason I like caucusing with the Buddhists.

      --


      What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  8. Pfffttt... by DirtySouthAfrican · · Score: 1

    Nowhere near as cool as this guy: http://www.internationalhero.co.uk/c/capcana1.htm!

    1. Re:Pfffttt... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      That one's funny, but even funnier is the other, "we're totally serious about this, eh", Captain Canada.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Pfffttt... by bicho · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know he is not a Captain, but I like this one better

      --

      errera hunamum ets
    3. Re:Pfffttt... by Country_hacker · · Score: 1

      My goodness, why does that man have a pair of testicles on his chin???

      --
      Never give any object more potential energy than you want it to have.
  9. SPOILERS!!! by R3s0lut3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Excuse me! There are some of us out here who haven't read Civil War yet! Ugh.

    1. Re:SPOILERS!!! by philpalm · · Score: 1

      Arrgh, now I will know what happens...I might not buy the next issue because some of the plot is revealed...well maybe not, the artwork wasm't up to my brother's standard... or some of the characters weren't real enough....

    2. Re:SPOILERS!!! by DreamingReal · · Score: 1
      It actually happened in his main title, not the Civil War mini-series. But in all fairness, finding out was unavoidable. I'm out of town and can't pick up my books until this weekend. It was ruined for me just by reading CNN earlier. The AP Wire even has the spoiler in the title. If you didn't get your issue by the time the comic shops opened on the East coast, then you were SOL on this surprise.

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    3. Re:SPOILERS!!! by EvanED · · Score: 1

      There are news sources other than Slashdot?!

    4. Re:SPOILERS!!! by thomkt · · Score: 1

      Yep, that was my thought too.

      Oh well.

    5. Re:SPOILERS!!! by infragilis · · Score: 1

      Actually, the fact of Captain America's (potential) death reveals nothing about the Civil War, other than the (non-surprising) fact that Cap doesn't die during the War.

    6. Re:SPOILERS!!! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But what you didn't know is that before he died he took out - The Lone Gunmen!

      Don't worry, it'll never happen again.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:SPOILERS!!! by coaxial · · Score: 1

      That's not our fault now is it?

      The world doesn't owe it to you to hide itself from you. Stop being such a whiny bitch.

      One more thing. Hamlet dies.

  10. What about the comic book? by biocute · · Score: 1

    The friendly article didn't seem to mention the future of the comic, will it continue without the main actor? His son Junior? Hitler the real father?

    Or maybe they can pull a Lost-stunt by drawing pages and pages of Captain America's flashbacks.

    1. Re:What about the comic book? by DeeSnider · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the publishing schedule for Captain America has a two month break after this issue. In the meantime, you get lots of one-off issues of a series called Fallen Soldier chronicling the reaction of other heroes to Cap's "death".

      Now, what's also not mentioned is that in another comic released today he seems to still be alive, "fighting for his life" (He was shot in the shoulder and stomach after all, how fatal is THAT in comics?). So, I think it's pretty safe to say he will be back soon enough, that's if he dies at all.

      Most popular current theories have this all as a staged stunt, to help Cap disappear underground and re-emerge in a new identity, Ronin, Iron Man, Hawkeye, or US Agent are the front runners. What it certainly is is an elaborate stunt by Marvel comics to sell lots of copies of this issue.

      So in short, nothing to see here, move along.

  11. He already died back in the late 1980s by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I've got that issue... It was going to be a massive collector's item...

    Then they brought him back...

    [[ BATTLESTAR GALACTICA SPOILERS ]]

    Of course I'm not sure what the big deal is... Starbuck just died and there's no media hoopla about that.

    1. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless Starbuck is a Cylon ... muhahahaha!

    2. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Zenaku · · Score: 1


      Probably because nobody believes she's dead. Maybe I'm still in denial, but I just don't buy it. After all that buildup about her destiny and crap I'm supposed to accept that said destiny was to fly into a storm and explode? I don't buy it. I put the odds at 50 percent chance of some future episode revealing a barely plausible explanation for how she ejected and was picked up by the cylon heavy raider (or similar deus ex machina), 30 percent of some mystical afterlife nonsense based on "god" or "the gods" followed by a resurrection, and 10 percent chance she wakes up in a pool of goo as one of the remaining 5 cylon models.

      When I move from denial to bargaining, maybe we could start an online petition! Those ALWAYS work!

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    3. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... one of the remaining 5 cylon models.

      Or (follow me on this), the storm caused her to be thrown
      back in time and across the galaxy (to say 1980 Earth) where she
      has adventures on what appears to the the set for CHiPs.

      This will be spun into a new series.

    4. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      Ha! I like it. I was reserving my last 10 percent for "I'm wrong and it's none of the above" but what the hell -- 10 percent chance she is thrown back in time.

      Only I think it will be to the dark ages, where she will fight Deadites using her appropriately modifed Viper and her knowledge of gunpowder.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    5. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised. That show has already had way too many cases of deus ex machina, what's one more? So many times I've hoped that I'd finally seen the last of one of the characters I don't like, but no, the biggest character who died (and probably ever will) was Billy. Great.

      Maybe the key to finding earth and making peace with the cylons is having every character on the show come back from the brink of death.

      And as for your predictions, I vote that all 3 will happen.

    6. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by solios · · Score: 1

      Marvel never, ever actually kills a character. They just can't; it goes completely against their Franchise-And-Flog mentality, and it's the main reason I stopped reading Marvel titles in the late 90s. If you're going to kill my favorite characters, have the decency to leave them dead, dammit.

      As for Starbuck... the media (and many fans) stopped giving a shit about Galactica when the writers gave up on serious, interesting bits (genocide, fleet issues, politics, etc) to dwell on the goddamned Starbuck/Apollo/Anders love triangle. I'd like to think that if they hadn't decided to wallow in that tepid garbage for so many episodes, the show would still be on Friday nights and Sci-Fi would have ordered a full s4 instead of 13 eps.

      That's my theory, anyway. But I'm bitter about it.

      If anything, Starbuck got sucked up by the modern version of the Ship of Lights, which means she'll probably be back at some point.

      Or worse, the modern version of Doctor Zee will be sent in as a replacement.

    7. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      It think that the love triangle was because some marketing guy or producer said "We need a love story to attract a broader audience and more female viewers". So the writers said, "Sure we'll write a love story. The shittiest, most contrived piece of drivel you've ever seen. And then when the ratings fall we'll go back to making a good show".

    8. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      Starbucks died? No more Latte? This can't be...

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    9. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSG killer spoiler!!
      oh! you inconsiderate bastard!!

    10. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I would say that Kat was a bigger character than Billy was. Her death was well done.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    11. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the media (and many fans) stopped giving a shit about Galactica"
      Are you high? That show is way popular. I dont get why people are hating on it as of late. The stories they are doing are perfectly valid plotlines. It cant be all posturing with cylons for the entire show. I am looking forward to the trial of baltar, and the subplot about him trying to create a workers resistance, and the aftermath, actually struck a cord with me. Sure this half season has been very kara heavy, but shes this "chosen one" so I would expect them to be building to something. Also a co worker just informed me that she is actually leaving the show to have a kid or something for a while, so they are probably just getting a bunch of kara eps out of the way. Im not sure if thats acurate, but she reads all the fansites about BSG so im inclined to believe her. I dont read them because I dont personally like spoilers, and we have come full circle to the original topic.

    12. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but she always annoyed me greatly, so I was glad to see her kick the bucket. Billy was a nice guy that I was sad to see go.

    13. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by solios · · Score: 1

      Makes as much sense as any other explanation - since they got the love triangle out of their systems, the quality of episodes has gotten a heck of a lot better. I've really enjoyed the last few, personally.

    14. Re:He already died back in the late 1980s by tm2b · · Score: 1

      We also shouldn't forget Crashdown. His death was also really significant.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  12. 1941 by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    I have the first Captain America, he fights the German Donald Duck. Guess who wins.

    1. Re:1941 by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...the German Donald Duck

      I had always assumed Donald was Canadian.
      Slashdot is better source of information than Wikipedia!

  13. Pre-Curser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they could do a back-story series, something along the lines of "The Adventures of 2nd Lieutenant America".

  14. BWAH-HAH-Hah-hah! by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our sinister plans are coming along just fine.

    Without colorfully decked out heroes to inspire patriotic thoughts, America's youth will now turn to video games, skate boards, meaningless text chatter and enormous quantities of junk food to fill the empty hole in their lives.

    Hmmm?

    Already doing that, are they?

    Dang.

    Well, perhaps we need to demoralize the younger set. We have an offer to kill Barney the Purple Dinosaur. Kids still like him, right?

    Wait, the KIDS want us to kill him?

    That's it. I'm going back to Eddoria.

    1. Re:BWAH-HAH-Hah-hah! by aka1nas · · Score: 1

      I've just started reading enough Lensmen to appreciate that. :>)

  15. Tough sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I guess it's hard to market a character so closely identified with the most hated nation since Nazi Germany.

    1. Re:Tough sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry that is incorrect. The answer we were looking for is France...France.

    2. Re:Tough sell by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      I guess it's hard to market a character so closely identified with the most hated nation since Nazi Germany.

      Because the Soviet Union was oh-so-popular.

    3. Re:Tough sell by u8i9o0 · · Score: 1

      If this was related to any marketing problems, then instead of killing him they should have just adjusted things a tiny bit and called him Capitán América.

      That's good for, like, twenty countries!

      --
      This is not my sig
    4. Re:Tough sell by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a blatant exaggeration. According to this recent BBC poll they're only the 3rd most hated nation right now.

    5. Re:Tough sell by sbmke · · Score: 1

      Captain Latin America. A berry berry good idea. Actually, that Marvel helped fake Captain America's death because he was about to be outed as an online buyer of HGH.

    6. Re:Tough sell by beiramar · · Score: 1

      According to that BBC poll, the US is 3rd place to North Korea's 4th and Russia's 5th. Captain America should be resurrected and move to Canada, the most loved nation in the poll.

    7. Re:Tough sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm yeah it was. Remember, every country in the world was either on the US side or USSR's. There was really no in between and the US only had just a little over half. So there were many countries that actually liked the USSR. Just that as an economic engine, the USSR side failed.

    8. Re:Tough sell by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

      LOL, that made my day. I don't care if these skanks did rate it flamebait.

    9. Re:Tough sell by Aris+Katsaris · · Score: 1

      You seem to be comparing popular sentiment *now*, with military alliances *then*. That's apples and oranges. If you're to mention Soviet alliances back then, then America still has lots and lots of alliances, about as many as it had in the time of Cold War (it has lost alliances in Latin America but has gained in Eastern Europe) And if you're to talk about popular sentiment, then you've got to consider that countries like Hungary and Chechoslovakia rebelled and had to be invaded to keep them "friendly" to the USSR.

    10. Re:Tough sell by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. the continuing trend of sovietisation of all our culture is destroying our heritage. You can't go anywhere now without seeing a drive-thru McKiev "restaurant". Our football teams are all being bought up by russian millionaires! (wait.. that one's true..)

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  16. News? by taupin · · Score: 0

    So Captain America is gone - or maybe he isn't.

    Surprise, surprise.

    1. Re:News? by Socguy · · Score: 1

      I must disagree with you. If you examine the tagline "Slashdot - news for nerds. Stuff that matters" you will see that this story is exactly the thing that is most relevant to the target audience.

    2. Re:News? by meckhert · · Score: 1

      Then by that logic, shouldn't 99% of the stories here be tagged as news? My point was that I don't see how this post is more deserving of the tag "news" than other posts.

    3. Re:News? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Is there a comic icon?

      If not, there really should be one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. Death isn't final, huh? by shimage · · Score: 1

    In the comic-book universe, death is not always final.

    Not only isn't it final, it's a cliche.

    1. Re:Death isn't final, huh? by draggin_fly · · Score: 1

      I think death is final for one character: Bucky.

  18. confusing by niloroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    i am wondering if it is to much for me to ask for some semblance of reality injected into the comic industry. With the frequency that characters are killed, resurrected, killed again, cloned, or brought in from another universe, i highly doubt that Cap will make it more than 6 months before someone finds him under a rock somewhere, most likely with amnesia if i had to guess.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:confusing by Snowgen · · Score: 5, Funny

      i am wondering if it is to much for me to ask for some semblance of reality injected into the comic industry.

      I agree! Let's stick to realistic flying people with telepathic powers and super-human strength that the got from a gamma-radiated firefly!

    2. Re:confusing by maxume · · Score: 1

      This may be heresy, but try the Marvel Ultimate universe, complete with a cannibalistic Hulk and wife beating Henry Pym. Also, lots of silly self referential nonsense(Nick Fury is basically Sam Jackson, the characters make fun of their stupid uniforms, etc.).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:confusing by brouski · · Score: 1

      Hank Pym being a wife beater is actually quite canonical. He's a messed up individual in any universe.

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    4. Re:confusing by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      "Suspension of disbelief." It's easier to be convinced by a representation of a world otherwise normal where people have psychic powers than a world where popular people never seem to stay dead, transparently for the purposes of marketing.

    5. Re:confusing by maxume · · Score: 1

      Retconning, it is clear that I included the Pym reference to demonstrate that they didn't take anything good out.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:confusing by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Try The Authority, and as somebody else pointed out, the various Ultimates lines.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  19. Who was Steve Rogers? by biocute · · Score: 1

    According to Wikipedia:

    Rogers attempts to enlist, only to be rejected due to his poor constitution.

    Then

    A U.S. Army officer looking for test subjects offers Rogers the chance to serve his country by taking part in a top-secret defense project -- Operation: Rebirth, which seeks to develop a means of creating physically superior soldiers. Rogers volunteers for the research and, after a rigorous physical, combat training and selection process, is chosen as the first human test subject

    So he was not fit to be enlisted, yet strong enough to participate in this rigorous physical, combat training and selection process?

    1. Re:Who was Steve Rogers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (cough) Wikipedia (cough). Did you make sure it wasn't penned by Essjay?

    2. Re:Who was Steve Rogers? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well the people who did well failed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Who was Steve Rogers? by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      So he was not fit to be enlisted, yet strong enough to participate in this rigorous physical, combat training and selection process?

      Since he obviously wasn't good enough to be enlisted, they settled for giving him a commission. Hence, Captain America.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    4. Re:Who was Steve Rogers? by nick.ian.k · · Score: 1

      So he was not fit to be enlisted, yet strong enough to participate in this rigorous physical, combat training and selection process?

      Maybe he was the most (ahem) yielding participant in the rigorous physical?

      C'mon. Wouldn't be the first or last time submissiveness got somebody a few gold stars.

    5. Re:Who was Steve Rogers? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Just to play devil's advocate here, it is possible to very strong with no stamina whatsoever.

      You're right though, tis stupid :)

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  20. It's a comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he won't be dead for long, he'll be brought back to life with faddy near future nanocloning techniques, shipped in from some alternate universe, or his nephew Duddly W Dickens will take over the role

  21. Come on, this is comics.... by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Death in comic books is always nearly kinda sorta semi perminent.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  22. Figures by Malakusen · · Score: 0

    America's already dead, the Captain of it may as well follow.

    Or am I being too curmudgeonly?

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
    1. Re:Figures by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say curmudgeonly. I'd say typical Slashdottian jackassery.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Figures by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      True. America isn't all dead. It's just mostly dead. And mostly dead is still slightly alive. If America was all dead then all we could do is look for loose change.

      That's still a generation or so away.

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  23. Which one? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
    You call yourselves nerds?

    PFFAAGH!

    I laugh at you!

    Is this the Capt. America that fought the Red Skull, or the Capt. America that fought the Red Skull?

    I can tell by the perplexed looks upon your pale faces that you don't realize that there was another Capt. America, in the 1950s!

    Drag yourselves back to your mother's basement to dig out your old comic books and you will disgust yourselves almost as much as you disgust me.

    I laugh at you again. No, better yet, I spit on you.

    SIGNED Red Skrull

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    1. Re:Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, Red Skull, try my GRANDMOTHER'S basement to get comics from the 1950's. Time rolls on, big guy.

      Second of all, it's the same Capt. America, trapped in an iceberg all those years.

      Third of all, have you tried some of the new moisturizers? Nivea can do amazing things for that whole "skull face" thing.

    2. Re:Which one? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      tsk, tsk, tsk.

      You still don't see the difference. The Captain America pulled from the iceburg by The Avengers was not the same as the one from the fifties!

      By the way, you also missed that I am a Skrull, not a skull. :)

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  24. Sold Out by Snowgen · · Score: 1

    What really peeves me is that I've been reading Cap regularly for a while now, and I was just trying to by the next issue like I always do but all the frigging collectors and speculators bought them first. So a bunch of people who couldn't care less have it and I don't.

  25. Colonel America?! by Chagatai · · Score: 1
    There was a one-shot spinoff/alternate version of the X-Men comic book called Codename: X-Men that featured a variety of mutant miscreants being gathered for a mission rather than rotting in prison. In that world, Iceman used a squirt gun that he would turn into a lethal weapon, freezing blasts mid-flight. The leader of their organization was a dark fellow named "Colonel America". When asked about who he was and his relationship to Cap, he replied, "I'm who Captain America will be in a few years if he salutes all the right people and keeps clean," or something akin to that. He also had no remorse torturing and harming the X-Men as was. Kind of like today's America.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Colonel America?! by operagost · · Score: 1

      He also had no remorse torturing and harming the X-Men as was. Kind of like today's America.
      Yes, truly sad. I hear the President is kicking Wolverine in the 'nads and Dick Cheney's gay lesbian daughter (did you hear? She's gay) is molesting Jean Grey as we speak!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Colonel America?! by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1
      Dick Cheney's gay lesbian daughter (did you hear? She's gay) is molesting Jean Grey as we speak!

      DAMMIT!

      Don't you know to NEVER put an image like that out there? In less then a day there will be X-Men fanfic where that takes place just because someone read about it here and thought "yeah! That would be great!"

  26. Weaksauce death? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

    I never read much Captain America, but I read a good number of other Marvel comics. Frankly, getting sniped seems like a pretty damn weak death for someone so badass. It just doesn't seem fitting for a superhero to get taken out by a single dude with a rifle.

    1. Re:Weaksauce death? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Hey -- it happened to Achilles!

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    2. Re:Weaksauce death? by zuiraM · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should reflect more on that. :)

      Killing a superhero with a sniper-rifle sort of makes a statement. It isn't fitting. For anyone.

      The realities of our time caught up with him. Cap is dead because the concept for which he was a symbol is dead. And what better way to drive the point home than to be brought low with a sniper rifle?

  27. Sniped? by purify0583 · · Score: 0

    He gets shot walking out of a courthouse? I kinda thought he would have sacraficed himself for the greater good. Or died a glorious death in combat against the forces of evil. Pretty lame way to kill him off in my opinion.

    1. Re:Sniped? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      He gets shot walking out of a courthouse? I kinda thought he would have sacraficed himself for the greater good. Or died a glorious death in combat against the forces of evil. Pretty lame way to kill him off in my opinion.

      Kennedy metaphor, anybody? Symbol of American idealism shot down by lone nut?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Sniped? by beiramar · · Score: 1

      Seems to be a comment on the pettiness of today's social and political climate - hero against oppression led away in shackles, shot by what amount to Neds.

    3. Re:Sniped? by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      That's what happens these days. You get a guy in your base and he starts killin ur d00dz.

      Sad, really.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  28. He'll Be Back by Dr+Kool,+PhD · · Score: 1

    Some new young guy will show up with super powers and become the "new" Captain America. This stuff happens all the time, see Green Lantern.

  29. Read more at Marvel Database by CodeMonkey22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Marvel Database is the best place to read about this kind of stuff. (20,000+ articles)

  30. That'll be why he's being killed... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I guess it's hard to market a character so closely identified with the most hated nation since Nazi Germany.

    That's Captain America's point. He stands for what America was, not what it is now. That's why he's been leading the rebel faction throughout Civil War. Captain America's death is symbolic of the death of the American principles and ideals for which he fought for so long. If America has become a monster, then either Captain America must defeat it, or he must die fighting it, because to do otherwise would be to negate his own identity.

    Plus, it always shifts a shitload of comics and gets mainstream press attention when you kill off a big name like this. Even if you then just casually bring him back to life a few months later.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:That'll be why he's being killed... by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      I'll attempt to comment on your sig and make it relevant to your comment:

      ---
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.

      Just add "- see Fallujah."

      OK?

    2. Re:That'll be why he's being killed... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at the time those acts were committed, they were seen by the world-at-large (or at least those in power elsewhere) as acceptable or unimportant, and more importantly, back in those days, worldwide mass communications didn't exist the way it does now.

  31. Time for a new Captain America? by ikekrull · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its clear the old Captain America doesn't really symbolise what America stands for any more.

    I'm picturing a Baron Harkonnen from the Lynch Dune movie, drenched in blood and oil. His superpower would be the ability to fly at 50,000 feet in an invisible plane, and destroy his enemies (along with anyone else who happened to get in the way), with radioactive munitions.

    His weakness, which all superheroes have, would be his incredible stupidity.

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
    1. Re:Time for a new Captain America? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting his signature land-based vehicle: a jacked-up Hummer with huge wheels that gets 2 mpg. Don't forget the Jesus fish emblem on the back.

    2. Re:Time for a new Captain America? by danguyf · · Score: 1

      Captain America doesn't represent what America is, he represents the ideal of what America should be.

    3. Re:Time for a new Captain America? by mblase · · Score: 1

      Its clear the old Captain America doesn't really symbolise what America stands for any more.

      Sarcasm aside, you do understand that was the whole point of the character?

      Like Superman, he stands for an ideal holding the line against reality.

    4. Re:Time for a new Captain America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its clear the old Captain America doesn't really symbolise what America stands for any more.

      You realize, Captain America was created during World War II.

      You know, that time when the US government rounded up over 100,000 Japanese-looking folks (mostly US citizens) and sent them to internment camps. That time when alleged 'Nazi saboteurs' captured on US soil were tried by a military commission and executed in secret. That time when the US President ordered two entire cities, almost entirely composed of civilians, to be annihilated by the use of nuclear weapons.

      Yeah, America has changed since then. Maybe not as much as it should have, but it has at least changed a little.

      Further reading: Ex parte Quirin, Japanese American internment, Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    5. Re:Time for a new Captain America? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      His weakness, which all superheroes have, would be his incredible stupidity.

      Does this sound OK as a boring alternative?

  32. News? by meckhert · · Score: 1

    Why was this tagged as news? Anything that is posted here is technically "news", but frankly updates on the comic book world shouldn't get an additional "news" tag. The only way that would make sense is if Slashdot was a site dedicated to irrational childhood fantasies... oh wait! Seriously though, if Slashdot editors are going to post these sorts of stories (which I have no problem with), they should be more judicious when choosing tags. Otherwise they are meaningless.

  33. Garbage can lids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this was inevitable. I haven't seen the kind of garbage cans whose lids we used to use a shield when playing Captain America as kids recently either.

    Damn I'm old!

  34. Steve Rogers is dead, not Cap by DreamingReal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Joe Quesada is dissembling because "death" in comic books rarely is. Hiatus is a better word to use for characters that supposedly die only to be brought back to life by the new writer on the next arc (Magneto anyone?).


    That said, Cap will be back. Steve Rogers was not the only Captain America and he won't be the last. William Naslund, Jeff Mace, a "fake" Steve Rogers, and most recently, John Walker briefly took the mantle of "Captain America" from Rogers. I am sure another Marvel hero will assume the role of Captain America in his stead.


    As a collector of the series, I am disappointed as Steve Rogers has been the one and only Captain America in my opinion and he can never be replaced, no matter who wears the costume.

    --
    We want some answers and all that we get
    Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

    - Ministry
    1. Re:Steve Rogers is dead, not Cap by Plekto · · Score: 1

      That said, Cap will be back. Steve Rogers was not the only Captain America and he won't be the last. William Naslund, Jeff Mace, a "fake" Steve Rogers, and most recently, John Walker briefly took the mantle of "Captain America" from Rogers. I am sure another Marvel hero will assume the role of Captain America in his stead.
      ****
      Sounds like a re-hash of Green Lantern to me.

      Started out as one guy... now it's whatever guy currently has the ring(plus the hundreds of them apparently out in the wider galaxy).

      I'm voting for some (Al-Queda type group) scientist cloning his DNA to make an anti-Cap supersoldier.

    2. Re:Steve Rogers is dead, not Cap by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      That said, Cap will be back. Steve Rogers was not the only Captain America and he won't be the last. William Naslund, Jeff Mace, a "fake" Steve Rogers, and most recently, John Walker briefly took the mantle of "Captain America" from Rogers. I am sure another Marvel hero will assume the role of Captain America in his stead.

      Maybe that Winter Soldier guy, hmmmmm? (Name starts with a B and ends with a Y.)

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  35. Corporate America Triumphs Again by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    66 huh? So we are expected to believe that it's a coincidence that just 1 year after his pension benefits kick in he suddenly dies. I think not. Just a little too convenient...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Corporate America Triumphs Again by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      He was lucky. Most movie crime fighters get killed hours before they are set to retire. On top of that, they get killed as collateral damage, all because they accompanied a super cop, like Chuck Norris or Arnold.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  36. Art imitates life by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Captain America dies. He, a hero burned in the popular imaginary as a *defender* the multiple freedoms people are naturally entitled (note the operative word there, defender, as in "a fighter who holds out against attack"). He that, even to the ones (like me) that didn't read the comics, is known to portrait the very image of America, the World Police, the Shield of the free world. He that used all his strengths to defend the world against the Nazi and the commies, armed with nothing more than a shield and his will to do the right thing. Dead.

    Maybe it is just coincidence that he is dead now, right when the vision of an U.S.A holding the high standards of freedom and fighting the good fights is vanishing every intervention, every occupation, every bad move in the fragile international relationships. (And I say "the vision" because, even U.S.A. making some bad movies between the end of WWII and the fall of The Wall, the fear of the communism was enough to impair the sight of the so called Free World, forgiving every single American mistake on that time, from Indochina to Central America, from Africa to South America).

    I doubt the artists behind the comics would be courageous enough to make such a statement, to kill a superhero only to make a point. But the could have done. Captain America doesn't represents U.S.A anymore, America a long time ago gave up of the "land of free and home of brave" motto, gave up the "land of opportunities" ideal to embrace a no holds barred savage capitalism, where companies have the same rights but none of the duties of the natural people and can leverage their immortality to get rich at the expenses of the less favored. If Captain America was a real person in the real world, it would probably be fighting with all his strengths to restore to America everything that was lost in the past 60 years. But he isn't, so he is better off dead.

    Jack Bauer is a better hero for U.S. now, anyway. Rest in peace if you can, Captain America, knowing that everything you fought for is about to be thrown away for 30 pieces of silver.

    1. Re:Art imitates life by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I doubt the artists behind the comics would be courageous enough to make such a statement, to kill a superhero only to make a point.

      I could see the excellent J Michael Strazynsci (speling?) doing this. Or individuals like Grant Morrison who routinely pervert characters to their own sociopolitical interests (I don't like my X-Men comics infused with Freudian undertones.)

    2. Re:Art imitates life by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      Today's Captain America would carry an assault rifle and defend oil pipelines from insurgents.

    3. Re:Art imitates life by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      No, actually.. the article I read about it on CNN implied there was a great deal of symbolism to his death as it relates to what is happening in our country (the U.S.).

    4. Re:Art imitates life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I doubt the artists behind the comics would be courageous enough to make such a statement, to kill a superhero only to make a point.

      No, I think this is exactly what they're doing. Marvel's big story event 'Civil War' finished with Capt. America realising that he wasn't representing the will and desire of most Americans. It's inevitable that he "dies" now, in at least a symbolic sense.

    5. Re:Art imitates life by BeReasonable · · Score: 1

      There's a scene in one of the endless Civil War tie ins which shows the Punisher picking up Capt. America's uniform. Personally I think that is a horribly bad choice, but it seems to be the consensus that the Punisher represents America more now. Plus Garth Ennis has written for him and I can only imagine the author of the Preacher, some of the best Hellblazers, and Goddess would do for Cap.

    6. Re:Art imitates life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany elects the NSDAP in part because Zionists had been using the media in Europe to further their own interests including fomenting wars, getting Germany to give up and accept the injustices of the treaty of Versailles, and promoting an ideology that killed more Ukrainians than Jews were killed in WW2, among many other peoples.

      Joseph Simon then creates a propaganda hero to whip Americans into war fever against the new regime.

      How ironic.

    7. Re:Art imitates life by devonbowen · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about the same America that was creating camps for its Japanese citizens at the very time the Captain was incarnated? America has its good side and its bad. Always has. Its recent history has just helped people see that.

      Devon

    8. Re:Art imitates life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Marvel did make such a statement in a previous issue: Steve Rogers was fighting for an outdated vision of America, one which did not match the reality of the USA in 2007.

      And whether he died or not, it wasn't a sniper that 'killed' him, but you'll have to read the book to get the details...

  37. I'm glad by David_Shultz · · Score: 1

    I will no doubt be offending fans of Captain America with this post, but frankly, I'm glad he's gone. I never liked Captain America for one very important reason: he took the place of the superhero who should have served as a patriotic, shield-wielding warrior -Captain Canada. What I'm trying to say is this: Captain Canada should have been the super hero with the shield. Think about it. If we are picking an item to represent the policies of the US, is a shield really the right one? Wouldn't a stealth missile be more appropriate? Canada's policies are much more defensive, and America's much more offensive -Captain Canada should have the shield, not Captain America. On top of that, Canada has the god damn Canadian Shield! The "Shield" is part of our countries geography!

    1. Re:I'm glad by djKing · · Score: 1

      The First Rule of the Canadian Shield, Don't Talk about the Canadian Shield. Why would we advertise it with a comic book hero?

      - Peace

      --
      Free as in "the Truth shall set you..."
    2. Re:I'm glad by BeReasonable · · Score: 1

      Have you seen how Cap uses that shield? It is a symbol of freedom and justice that he hides behind and that he flings around destroying everything from barricades to jaws. Seems perfectly American to me.

    3. Re:I'm glad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it. If we are picking an item to represent the policies of the US, is a shield really the right one? Wouldn't a stealth missile be more appropriate? Canada's policies are much more defensive, and America's much more offensive -Captain Canada should have the shield, not Captain America.


      Please.. Captain Canada would be sitting at home bleating about how mean the US is and then engaging in a circle jerk with like-minded socialists at the UN.
  38. Reminds me of by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

    Spock slipping in the shower

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  39. Re: Yes, the *real* terrorists have won by beiramar · · Score: 1

    Captain America was the main casualty of the "Civil War" over government registration [and control] of superheroes, a storyline which dealt with (as much as can be in the comics) the security-vs.-civil rights, slavery and related political issues. His death represents how "the terrorists have won", in this case, domestic ones driven by their xenophobia.

  40. Anyone have any idea by hkgroove · · Score: 1

    What Captain America's Purpose was during the Infinity Gauntlet / War series?

    Seriously, what could he have done against Galactus or Thanos?

    1. Re:Anyone have any idea by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Provided tactics and support.

      Not all problems can be solved by bouncing a shield off someones head.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Anyone have any idea by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

      When all other heros were dead or wounded, Cap was the last one to stand against Thanos in what was a distraction for the Silver Surfer to attempt to grab the gauntlet. He failed, and as a result, Cap was killed by a backhand that Thanos delivered in anger when he realized he let his attention slip.

      His role was more of a symbolic one in that confrontation, saying as long as there is one hero standing, they will stand against evil even in the face of impossible odds. Of course, all things were reverted when Nova managed to steal the gauntlet and set reality back by 24 hours.

  41. Re: Yes, the *real* terrorists have won by brouski · · Score: 1

    It's worth pointing out that Civil War ended with Captain America surrendering after realizing the pro-registration side was right.

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  42. Stupid stupid stupid by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe mainstream media (not Slashdot) actually got in on reporting this. Didn't they learn anything from "The Death of Superman?"

    This isn't even the first time Captain America has been killed off... sheez.

  43. Dead at 66? by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    The smoking and burgers finally caught up with him. I guess he really was an american.

  44. Re: Yes, the *real* terrorists have won by bicho · · Score: 1

    I read he surrendered after realizing how much damage a war was making, not because he thought he chose the wrong side. (But I didn't read the comic, it's just something I read in some random webpage)

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  45. Will be buried next to Bucky... by unitron · · Score: 1

    Surviving members of 'Captain America's Red, White, and Blues Band' will re-unite for the first time since the late '60s to play at the funeral, with Nick Fury taking Cap's place on lead shield.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  46. um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by searchr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some folks, those who actually read comics, have been slogging through this particular story arc for the better part of a year. One of those frustrating "cross-over" event stories, that involves every comic on the shelf, so there's no escape.

    A Year. A year of waiting and guessing and theorizing about the big ending, which is still a month or so away.

    So now, the ONLY people who give a crap just got a big steaming pile of **SPOILER** handed to them thanks to a too-soon press release and an unthinking media that, in spite of a multi-Billion dollar comic book movie market, still thinks no one's reading them enough to care if they ruin entire plots in the headlines.

    Jack Bauer Dies on 24 This Season!

    Lost Is Really On An Alien Planet!

    The Cheerleader Dies on Heroes!

    Harry Potter Becomes Evil In Final Book!

    you'd figure at least here in geek-land, a little more care would be taken.

    1. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sucks to be you.

      Next time a big event is happening either:
      A) Get whatever it is as soon as it is released.
      B) Lock yourself in your room.

      Shit man, it's a stinking comic. I mean in your post you strongly imply you weren't even enjoying it for crist sake.

      Yes I read comics, but I have some perspective.

      Also, you are still going to buy it, so in truth, you are the comics bitch.

      It's not like only Slashdot is carring this news.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1
    3. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by searchr · · Score: 3, Informative

      A: It isn't OUT yet. That's the point. It's been dragging on for a year and the big boffo resolution is a MONTH AWAY. Of course I hate that crap. I want good art and good writing, not crappy marketing and delayed schedules and cheap headline grabbing. Marvel screwed me and their customers on this more than anyone else, absolutely.

      If Slashdot were the only folks carrying it, no problem. But every major media outlet has it, so Google News has it, so everyone has it, at a glance, in the headline.

      You want perspective, that's what the examples were for. No way in hell a spoiler for Heroes or Lost or 24 would show up in the headline of mainstream news.

      But because its comics, oh no big deal, what are you whining about, blah blah. Remember that the next time you tape a "big game" and someone spills the score before you can watch. Or whatever it is you love that you feel is better than this.

      Maybe I'm just pissed because I was really hoping it would be Reed Richards who'd get capped.

    4. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 1

      "It isn't OUT yet. That's the point. It's been dragging on for a year and the big boffo resolution is a MONTH AWAY."

      Just so you know, the comic came out today.

    5. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by searchr · · Score: 1

      So was it in "Civil War: Confessions"? or "Civil War: Frontline"? "Civil War: Aftermath"? Or did it go in "Captain America: Civil War: Aftermath"? Or did they get tricky, stick it in "Iron Man: Civil War: Confession: Aftermath"? Or maybe only in the "Variant Cover" edition?

      I know it wasn't in the two week old finale of "Civil War", that'd be too easy.

      god I hate comics.

    6. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      god I hate comics.

      I like comics. I hate Marvel. I quit reading for the most part after that fucktard John Byrne got rid of the kid Green Goblin, brought back Norman Osbourne, the one comic book bad guy that actually stayed dead, and brought back Aunt May after she died from cancer in one gloriously shitty storyline.

    7. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
      Can I just say, I consider myself a geek and I would *never* waste time watching *any* of that crap that you've listed. Same thing with games -- how the fuck can y'all spend hours and hours playing confounded MMORPGs and shooting shit up and all the rest of it? I haven't enough time for my official paid work, let alone the routine own-time self-maintenance stuff (learning new stuff, reading books & generally staying up to date.)

      Perhaps it's just me.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    8. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by Builder · · Score: 1

      I think that is just you... Unless you work for yourself, you shouldn't be spending your whole life on paid official work. You should be spending whatever your contract requires you to do and maybe a couple of hours extra every week when it's needed.

    9. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      yes, of course, but when you you learn & develop new skills? I've never had formal training since I last worked at a megacorp multinational (D&B). The "small-to-medium" co I work for now (500 or so employees) provides some crappy Office CBT and naff all else. So I spend some of my own time reading round the subject. Eg the Richard Beijtlich "Tao of Security Monitoring" at present.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    10. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by Builder · · Score: 1

      I've never had any formal training in my entire life... I started out running cables, worked my way into Novel deployments and up from there.

      You learn in your own time... That's the norm in not just the IT industry today, but almost any professional career requires you to spend some of your own time learning. However, you said

      I haven't enough time for my official paid work, let alone the routine own-time self-maintenance stuff (learning new stuff, reading books & generally staying up to date.)

      That kinda implied you were doing the 12 hours at work stint when you said you didn't have time for your official paid work.

      Again, even after the learning and work, you really do have to MAKE some time for yourself, unrelated to your career. Even if it's only a couple of hours a week, it really is important.

      I absolutely insist that all of my staff leave on time at least a couple of days a week, don't work overtime in response to other people's lack of planning and find something that interests them outside of work. The difference in productivity between people who work 60 hour weeks and people who work 40 hour weeks is just astounding - the 40 hour guys deliver better quality, hit more deadlines and are generally more pleasant to work with. This means that our clients (external and internal) prefer to work with these 40 hour a week 'slackers' over working with the 60 hour week guys.

    11. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by mink · · Score: 1

      I am probably out of the loop, having not followed stuff for a long time, but didnt Kraven and Mysterio stay dead?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    12. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but those guys are third stringers, and there have been other "Hunters" after Kraven. Norman stayed dead for about 25 years, and he was Spider-Man's all time worst enemy, along with Doc Ock. I got this from the wikipedia page, along with a tidbit that continues the vicious cycle of me thinking that Marvel has hit rock bottom, only to find out they've dug the hole even deeper. Namely, that Norman Osbourne had an affair with Gwen Stacey, and knocked her up. With twins. O. M. F. G.

    13. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by mink · · Score: 1

      WOW. I wonder if it was the clone (I forgot what happened after the High Evolutionary figured out she was a clone) or an alternate universe or some zombie Gwen Stacy. I dont think I will read that wiki as I want what remains of my sanity intact.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    14. Re:um. slight spoiler for THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CARE by mink · · Score: 1

      Crap. I just discovered they made a zombie Mysterio complete with half his head blown off. Damn you Wiki^H^H^H^HMarvel.

      Even 3rd rate villians should be better dealt with.

      As I remember the other hunters were supposed to be his sons or something.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  47. I call Shenanigans by gmezero · · Score: 1

    Is that Dead == Dead forever, or is that dead == "marketing dead" like Captain Marvel, Superman, Jean Grey/Phoenix/Jean Grey/Alien Substitute/Dark Phoenix/cough, etc... etc...

    I used to be a massive comics reader up until the late 80's when I quit reading all together. What did it? It was the combined fiascos of the Marvel crossover series Inferno where some a$$wipe decided to unwind the entire history of Kitty Pride and Illiana (Cyclops little sister) with an "oops, it was all a group hallucination? Or was it? Well, nobody remembers or knows...(spooky music)", and the even more retarded History of the DC Universe two-issue comic that essentially said. "Hi there. You know that last 40 or so years of comics you've been reading? It's all shit, just forget about it, never happened." Atleast with Crisis, they tried to consolidate things within the framework of the existing story arcs. The "History" re-write was just a plane cop-out.

    That, then combined with the sheer greed of the comic greed of comic book publishers ("Hey, buy our 94 versions of this SPECIAL!!!! issue number 113, each featuring a different minor sub-character, and each one featuring a different foil cover and unique hologram!" for $8 each... no, there is no normal version offered this month) pretty much not only killed reading comics for me, but has prevented me from encouraging my kids to read comics. On the rare occasion that I do take them to the comic store, they get one or two each, I'm down $15-$20 and I seriously consider launching my own comic company that does 4-color on pulp paper. What's the point.

    On second hand, comic companies can go f' themselves. My kids reads web comics anyways now, so why should I worry about it.

    1. Re:I call Shenanigans by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I'm calling it bullshit! Capt. America will be back from the dead just as soon as it econmically explotable. It really hacked me off when they brought back Jean Grey too. I actually tossed the comic book in the trash and canceled all my subscriptions. Fucking bastards. Jean Grey's story line and death was one of the best I read.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:I call Shenanigans by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I think the main problem that the comics industry faced is when they started letting the artists write the comics. Which got us a procession of ridiculously silly, macho heroes with names that sounded like they were invented by the combined effort of a junior high school heavy metal band. "Spawn"? I mean, really.

    3. Re:I call Shenanigans by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Jean Grey's story line and death was one of the best I read.

      Yeah - that and Batman: A Death in the Family was one of my favourites.

      Watching Robin die was actually kind of satisfying.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:I call Shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... Inferno ended with Magik, sister of Colossus, being de-aged. Everything that she did still happened, Kitty was still her best friend, etc. it's just that she was no longer a teenager with a sword.

      As for Crisis, that's the book that said "we've got all these worlds that are so different, where WWII is still going on, wehre Superman never existed, where heroes don't exist, let's kitbash them all together." Two results were available, one in which the earth is made up of at least two Batmen and Two Robins, a Superboy and at least two Supermen co-existing, etc, and the other where they combine the best parts of both worlds and say "these stories happened on one world. If we thought it sucked, it didn't happen at all." History was the result of Crisis and tried to make sense of it, not the other way around like it seems to be in your head. You're blaming the cure for the symptoms.

      The marketing craze was bad, and stupid, but mainly affected the people who didn't realize you can choose not to buy. I didn't need 5 covers of X-Men 1, so I didn't buy them. The only books where you had to buy, what was essentially multiple copies of the same story just to get the story, were Team Titans 1 and (if I remember correctly) Outsiders 1 Alpha and 1 Omega. Most just had silly covers, and for a while Marvel was offering high end (with gimmick) and low end (no holograms, etc) editions, addressing your point about not being able to get a regular edition. Those gimmicks have been mostly ignored in recent years, only recently (within the past few years) with variant covers coming back (once again, you don't want the new cover, don't buy it.)

      If those are why you don't read comics, then you should rethink them, or at least take one of the other 10 billion reasons people use for why they don't read them any more.

    5. Re:I call Shenanigans by loganrapp · · Score: 1
      I don't get why people get so upset over Jean Grey's return.

      The name was Phoenix. Hello? Anyone read books anymore?

      I mean, Joss Whedon hits it on the head:

      "But Jean's dead."

      "Yeah, like that'll last."

    6. Re:I call Shenanigans by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I've always liked comic book CHARACTERS, but have never been able to get into comic books as a whole. There's so much cross-referencing, "required" reading, and the volumes are so thin, it's ridiculous. Plus, add to that the "comic book death" syndrome. Nothing is ever permanent. Spider-man will always be around. His villains will always be around. No matter how many times he tries to give up web-slinging, he'll still end up doing it again and again and again.

      This is why I do read a lot of manga. It has its bad parts, its own cliches, but death tends to be more "permanent." (Again, not always, but even Goku from DBZ stayed dead and just came back as an angel... thing... after a while) And the word "retcon" has never been applied (Evangelion has an "alternate universe" side-manga, but that's actually quite a good read and is still not "official.") I've noticed a lot of comic books trying to cash in on the popularity of manga by giving older characters a makeover involving giving characters much larger eyes and gravity-defying hair. Unfortunately, this is missing the key reason why manga is probably selling better: More diversity in selection (comics that not only appeal to girls, but are aimed AT them?!), more finality in storylines, and value ($8-10 gets me a book with page numbers in the hundreds, not $4 for 20 pages).

      I'm not saying Americans can't do comics, or that all Japanese comics rock (because, let's face it, 95% of any form of media is recycled crap). I'm just saying American comic artists, if they really want to revitalize the industry, need to:
      A) Start taking chances. Knock off some big-name heroes and villains. PERMANENTLY. Or maybe even dip into some new genres.
      B) This is a little harder, but something needs to be done about the American sentiment that comics are for kids. We need to see some really mature writing, and that doesn't mean gruesome violence. We have plenty of that.

    7. Re:I call Shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'd place it as when they started letting FANS write comics instead of profesional writers like Edmond Hamilton and Gardner F. Fox. Sure they were hacks but they had a literary background and a much better understanding of story.

    8. Re:I call Shenanigans by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Joss, however, actually has kept her dead. Now, Colossus - who was supposed to be completely and utterly dead forever with no chance of ever coming back not even as a zombie in an alternate-reality dream - he brought back, but Jean's staying out of the picture, I suspect, so long as Joss is writing Amazing.

    9. Re:I call Shenanigans by loganrapp · · Score: 1
      Because it's been done before.

      My point was that as far as Joss was concerned, judging by the way he presents it - Phoenix coming back really should be common knowledge. It's going to happen. Maybe he won't do it, but he knows it'll happen, we know it'll happen, and no one should've been surprised the first time, or any other subsequent time.

    10. Re:I call Shenanigans by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe Captain America is just in limbo temporarily because water boarding is not a direction that Marvel comics considers suitable for an American Icon.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:I call Shenanigans by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was why I was so pissed off. Jean Grey's death, to me, was the most perfect death of a major super hero. I mean the way she died, why she died, and that little speach that the Watcher did at the end. "... more important, she died human." That was some powerful shit to a 10 year old. Now they plug captain americas ass, big deal.

      Jean Grey's death wasn't just a water shed event in the X-Men but the entire marvel universe. So what did they do? Whipped out their dicks and pissed all over it.

      Fuck'em

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    12. Re:I call Shenanigans by franksands · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. For me, the main reason that I read a lot more manga than american comics is this: it ENDS. You have your beggining, your development and the stories ends somewhere. Even Dragon Ball, with its never-ending battles ended. And that's it, we all love DB, thank you so very much, end of the story. Toriyama himself has written some very good stories, after DB, like Sand Land.

      So, I will go even further in my advice to Marvel, DC: FINSIH IT. Spiderman, Superman, Batman, and all the other mans out there. Give them a rest, and create new stories, with new characters. And I mean mainstream characters, I love Vertigo, and it is definitely a step in the right direction, bu so far it is just a step, you have to go all the way.

    13. Re:I call Shenanigans by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Frankly I'm amazed that they've waited so long. I mean, Magneto took, what, three months? The only reason to keep Jean away is because of the Cyclops/Emma plotline, but considering the horribly slow, consistently late way the book is going they've more or less dropped that even.

      Joss is a great writer, but he's kinda dropped the ball recently.

      Also, maybe I just wasn't paying attention, but how did Wolverine manage to get back from, y'know, the sun? I'm amazed that he could even live through that.

    14. Re:I call Shenanigans by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I was similarily pissed when John "fucktard" Bryne bought back Norman Osbourne, the *one* bad guy that actually stayed dead. Oh, and brought back Aunt May, who had died of cancer. And got rid of the kid Green Goblin, because now that Norman was back, we couldn't have two Green Goblins running around, now could we?

    15. Re:I call Shenanigans by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      They killed Aunt May? Damn that is a shame. Not that they killed the bitch off, but they brought her back. I couldn't stand that old bat. If there was ever a "dependant" character that needed killing it was that bitch.

      Since we got a marvel dead bitch thread going lets not forget the vampires. Dr. Strange killed all them fuckers off with one spell. I still have the issue, around here somewhere. On the last page there is a big ass certificate that says all vampires are dead and there will never be another one in marvel comics again. Signed by Stan "fuck tard" lee himself.

      Well I bailed not long after that but I kept one finger in the marvel comics world. Well last time I checked the vampires where back. Capt. America maybe pushing up daisys this week but they will dig is moldy carcuss up, stick a flower in his button hole, and milk his ass for all he is worth. Once they realize they can make a buck off this jackass.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    16. Re:I call Shenanigans by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Maybe you have just been reading wrong comics? As a kid I read Disney (Donald Duck mostly) and The Phantom, and I didn't see any major continuity-issues or in-comic historical revisionism in 'em. As I got older my interests moved to Calvin & Hobbes and classic Disney.

      I think the idea of having a huge "universe" or interlinked characters, history and storylines is a good one. But as reality has shown us, they tend to grow too large and complex to manage, and at some point the publisher is going to make some major changes to them, disrupting the whole experience.

      Don't discourage your kids from reading comics just because DC and Marvel suck. There's tons of great comics out there. And, of course, there's always the classics. I don't care one bit about the modern Disney-comics, but the classic Disney is as good as it gets.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    17. Re:I call Shenanigans by AoT · · Score: 1

      Well, it is the X-Men. At one point, immediately post "Days of Vengeance" i think, they had all been dead at least once. And real dead, not like, oh, we only think they're dead. They just get brought back to life by a goddess or some such thing.

    18. Re:I call Shenanigans by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      SPOILER ALERT

      You might get your wish with Aunt May, she's been shot.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    19. Re:I call Shenanigans by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is related to the difference between American and Japanese media in general. If you read Japanese comics, you'll notice the production values are lower. Now, I don't mean the artist-related costs; manga are primarily black and white and run in huge weekly tomes containing bits of lots of manga universes by different artists. Then, the creator is the famous one, not the manga itself. So when a story ends, the creator has a fanbase instead of the story itself. The creator then begins a new manga, and has tons of people reading. In the US, there are a ton of comic creators who are unknow while their comics are still famous. I have read [insert qualifier here, such as "astonishing"] X-Men, but I'd be hard pressed to name more than five people who have worked on X-Men, and then only one am I absolutely sure ever had a hand in the comics is Stan Lee. With the exception of a few names (Gaiman, Stan Lee, Miller), the emphasis is on the character and not on the creator.

      Japanese television is the same way. While we Americans have an abundance of shows that run nearly 10 seasons (Cheers, Friends, Seinfeld, Family Matters, etc., etc., etc.), Japanese TV shows (sitcoms and such) typically run 13 weekly episodes and then they're over. The emphasis is on the actor and broadcaster instead of on the story, as far as marketing goes. "Oda Yuuji has a new drama out!" Casts also tend to be smaller in Japan (again with the lower production values so there isn't as much of an investment in a show which will end in 4 mos. time).

      In Japan, everything serialized (with a few exceptions, such as Dragon Ball and Ranma 1/2) tends to run for a short period of time in which the creator is the famous one, not the work itself. In the US, everything serialized is intended to either be cancelled early on (within a year or two), or run for long time, and the work itself is what becomes famous.

    20. Re:I call Shenanigans by franksands · · Score: 1

      First of all, thanks for the serious reply, I thought I was gonna be trolled like there were no tomorrow. Secondly, I think that though the media is definitely different as you pointed out so well, this does not mean that we should have an story that lasts for 60 years, and for one main reason: no one is that creative. It's impossible to have a 60 year storyline that is coherent, and still draws atention from the readers. That's why DC revamps the whole universe every 5 years or so.

      Regarding the focus on the writer, instead of on the characters, I think that is a good thing. I admit that I, myself does not know by heart many people that work in comics (writers, artists, etc), but you could always use something like "from the creators of Astounding X-Men, comes -insert new comic here-".

    21. Re:I call Shenanigans by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Those are mostly the same reasons that I've never developed a comic-book habit. Yet I have dozens of manga volumes.

      - No overreaching plot arch in most of them. The ones that do have long-range plots are the ones that I enjoy. For example: "Year of the Bastard" has an excellent arch and conclusion. Possibly Spawn - except for the crossover issue addiction.

      - Too many damn crossover issues where you have to buy 3 other comics in order to follow the story. That ticks me off and makes me simply stop following the issues. Back in the glory days, you might have small crossovers about once every 20-30 issues. Now it seems like every other issue involves some sort of crossover.

      - The end is never the end. Plot points should be final. Most manga artists in Japan do this as they lay out a 2/3/4/5 year arc that has a definite conclusion. When you're done, you're done. Then find another story to tell.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    22. Re:I call Shenanigans by gmezero · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't discourage them from comics (well, not consciously). Like I said, I do take them out every now and then and let them pick up a couple. But the price is exorbitant in my mind when I'm paying $1.75 for a Sonic the Hedgehog comic. I've actually been encouraging them to read web comics instead. I've even been encouraging them to try and do their own work.

      Yes, I know there have been some really great graphic novels/series that have came out over the years, but I don't have the extra cash to buy lots of #1's just to find the good stuff, and by the time I hear about something being good, the #1 is going at collector's prices, making it unlikely I will get to read it. So, then I must wait for the bound set to come out (in the case of a mini-series) to have a second chance at a reasonable price for the issues... but, by then my initial peak of interest is long gone.

      It just really bums me out because I had always thought this would be an appreciation I could pass on and share with my children. To be honest, if they would sell comics at reasonable prices as PDFs that I could download and share with my kids, I'd probably start buying again.

    23. Re:I call Shenanigans by gmezero · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I see manga as another format as well. In fact I feel a good value in buying the manga books. My kids are big fans of the Naruto series right now, and we pick them up at our leisure without fear that if we missed an issue we're going to have to pay premium price for it later. Oddly enough I would almost lump the Captain Underpants series in with this class as well rather than in the comic book side of the equation. Those have been a great value, and alot of fun to read.

    24. Re:I call Shenanigans by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      They killed Aunt May? Damn that is a shame. Not that they killed the bitch off, but they brought her back.

      Oh, you have no idea. First, on Norman: Spider-Man's most deadly enemy, would do anything to hurt/kill him, etc etc. Stabbed himself through the heart with his own goblin glider, but now we find out that he regenerated and has been hiding out in Europe for five years. Riiiight. At least when they brought back Doc Ock from the land of the dead, they put a little more effort into it: he was resurrected by the Hand.

      Now, Aunt May had died of cancer during the Spider Clone storyline. Now, how does John Bryne bring her back? Norman kidnapped May and replaced her....with a clone. And it was the clone that got cancer and died. And this is why you should give John Bryne a slap in the face and a kick in the nuts if you ever run into him.

      Well last time I checked the vampires where back. Capt. America maybe pushing up daisys this week but they will dig is moldy carcuss up, stick a flower in his button hole, and milk his ass for all he is worth. Once they realize they can make a buck off this jackass.

      They already did that about ten years or so ago. Cap had some degenerative disease, and "died". Buried and everything. They brought him back by having the Red Skull give him a complete blood transfusion.

    25. Re:I call Shenanigans by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      This is why I do read a lot of manga....the word "retcon" has never been applied

      Well, that's true. Manga comics don't bother to retcon; when they contradict themselves, they just punt. The fans have to do the retcon themselves.
      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  48. baby new year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was only a matter of time. He was replaced by Team America a while back. Fuck Yeah!

  49. The Return by brownpau · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sure Marvel's already working on a "Return of Captain America" line involving four people all claiming to be Cap - a black man in adamantium body armor, a young boy, a cyborg, and an energy being.

    1. Re:The Return by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Actually, we figure the four of Cap's replaements will be:

      Bucky (any of them) as the standard replacement.

      Frank Castle as a Cap with guns.

      The Falcon or Cage taking over as the black Cap.

      Some woman for a female Cap. Carol Danvers currently has powers again, so she's out. Sharon Carter is a good bet. My vote is for Frankie Raye.

    2. Re:The Return by VShael · · Score: 1
      I'm sure Marvel's already working on a "Return of Captain America" line involving four people all claiming to be Cap - a black man in adamantium body armor, a young boy, a cyborg, and an energy being.

      Only to discover, in a "shocking" twist, that none of them are the original, and the original wasn't dead after all.

  50. Call me cynical by Godji · · Score: 1

    But resurrections are not unknown in the world of comics, and Marvel Entertainment editor in chief Joe Quesada said a Captain America comeback wasn't impossible."

    I think what he meant to say was, "You know, guys, why don't you all fans out there buy whatever copies of the comics you can get, and maybe we'll see so much profit that we'll decide to bring the thing back..."

    Why would you cancel something if you intend to make it come back? To generate attention, I guess.

  51. 'Twas Irony That Killed Captain America by twifosp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I believe killing off Captain America was just a metaphor.

    Captian America was a bit different than your gadern variety superhero. He didn't fight super villians, evil geniuses, and/or monsters/aliens. He fought for civil liberty, freedom, and rights. Analogies of those at times, but those were his core reason to fight.

    Imagine then the writers dillema when they realize in order for Captian America to fight for those things, he must fight America itself. Instead of be faced with that overwhelming irony, they took the easy way out and killed him off. I would have preferred they make a stand and actually had Captain America turn his shield on the White House for a few issues. Mr. Smith goes to Washington squared.

    R.I.P.
    Captain America
    1941-2007
    Crushed by Irony

    1. Re:'Twas Irony That Killed Captain America by praksys · · Score: 1

      Captain America began in WWII - a war in which the US locked up an entire segment of its population just to be on the safe side (Japanese internment), conscripted millions of others, routinely executed unlawful combatants, and mass bombed civilian populations (and it wasn't "collateral damage" either - the civilians were often the primary target).

      Back then people knew that the survival of democracy and civil liberty required an unflinching willingness to seriously fuck up anyone who wanted to take those good things away. Today the people who talk most about civil liberties wouldn't lift a finger to defend them.

      Captain America wasn't crushed by irony, he was made obsolete by indifference.

    2. Re:'Twas Irony That Killed Captain America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I believe killing off Captain America was just a metaphor."

      That's because you're looking for meaning in a comic book where it doesn't exist.

      "Captian America was a bit different than your gadern variety superhero. He didn't fight super villians, evil geniuses, and/or monsters/aliens. He fought for civil liberty, freedom, and rights. Analogies of those at times, but those were his core reason to fight."

      And in the 35 years I've been reading comics, all those battles with the Red Skull, Baron Zemo, and Ultron were just figments of my imagination, while Cap was marching in political rallies...

      "Imagine then the writers dillema when they realize in order for Captian America to fight for those things, he must fight America itself."

      You're projecting your own politics into a comic book story. In Civil War, the conflict was over one thing....whether super-powered beings should submit to some kind of goverment approval process as a safety measure, because a bunch of amateurs went off and got innocents killed. Were superheroes possible to exist, it'd be foolish to think that this wouldn't be the case.

      "Instead of be faced with that overwhelming irony, they took the easy way out and killed him off."

      Pfft. They decided to pull a death-of-Superman and boost a lagging title.

      "I would have preferred they make a stand and actually had Captain America turn his shield on the White House for a few issues."

      Yeah, because the 2006 elections proved that Bush and the GOP is unbeatable and none of his opponents can get elected, so lets chuck that democracy thing and lead an armed assault on the goverment. Great idea.

      Captain America failed himself. Plain and simple, that's the way Civil War was written. For those that want to paint Civil War as some allegory of the Iraq War or internal politics, it's just a story. It's a crossover event designed sell comics. In the series, the registration measure has overwhelming public support. At the end, when Cap is preparing to decapitate Tony Stark, he's tackled by a group of angry citizens. He looks around at the destruction his rebellion has caused, and he realizes he has become what he most despises...someone that puts himself above Country. He became bigger than the uniform he wore. Captain America may stand for American Values, but the character has always been first and foremost a soldier. Soldiers take orders. They don't lead armed rebellions against their lawfully elected goverment.

      In the end, he orders his rebel forces to stand down, and he surrenders. He knows what he did was wrong. The last scene of him in Civil War is sitting in a jail cell, awaiting his fate.

      Look at the cover of the issue of CA where he's killed. Protesters were mocking him as a traitor for his leadership of the rebellion. Marvel was not presenting him as some kind of redeeming hero.

      R.I.P.
      Captain America
      1941-2007
      Crushed by Iron Man

    3. Re:'Twas Irony That Killed Captain America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more!

    4. Re:'Twas Irony That Killed Captain America by Punch-Drunk+Slob · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it wasn't Iron Man? :)

      --
      By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes: Open, locks, whoever knocks!
    5. Re:'Twas Irony That Killed Captain America by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      That idea was covered in The Authority. "Hey, wait a minute. We're super heroes; some of us are cosmic-power superheroes. Why the hell CAN'T we *make* the world a better place?"

      It was an interesting take.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  52. Re: Yes, the *real* terrorists have won by brouski · · Score: 1

    I think he realized that his actions (taking a super-powered war to the streets) were proving the pro-registration side right.

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  53. Definition of "Death" in comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Different comic companies have different definitions of dead. Typically they are:
    • Marvel dead : Dead for the rest of the issue, possibly not resurrected until the next issue. Roughly equivalent to "Mostly dead is partially alive"
    • DC dead : Actually dead, but resurrected "later," typically in the next series.
    • Dark horse dead : Really, really dead. As in, the permanent kind.
    Yes, there are plenty of exceptions,
  54. Dupe? by anothy · · Score: 1

    Not the slashdot story, but the Marvel one. Didn't we see this at least once already?

    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  55. mod parent funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol. I havent read a comic since jthm but that was a mighty funny post.

  56. ...eaten by wolves... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    ...he was delicious.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  57. Re:Captain Rendition? by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    He soars in to locate America's greatest suspected enemies, then escorts them to a third world country that is friendly to the US, so they can be tortured endlessly until they die. If they live, he takes them to Guantanamo Bay where they can be imprisoned without charges and held indefinitely "because someone thought they might possibly be guilty of something".

    Its kind of a change from what America used to stand for, but it probably reflects the way the US is seen these days by a lot of foreigners a bit more accurately.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  58. The Star-Spangled Banner by dexter+riley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    America a long time ago gave up of the "land of free and home of brave" motto

    Remember, the last line of the national anthem isn't a motto, it's a question:

    "O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
    o'er the land of the free, and the home of the brave?"

    Every generation has to ask themselves the question; every generation has to work to make the answer "yes".

    1. Re:The Star-Spangled Banner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kudos on the most brilliant post I've ever seen on Slashdot. That was inspiring.

    2. Re:The Star-Spangled Banner by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Amen! I agree, and I've been reading slashdot for a while.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  59. I nominate Elric... by Belegothmog · · Score: 1

    I nominate Elric of Melnibone as a replacement for Steve Rogers, recently deceased Captain America. I believe that he the best representative for the USA.

    1. Re:I nominate Elric... by zuiraM · · Score: 1

      How about Galactus?

      Oh, right, he doesn't live off oil. :P

  60. This just in: by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

    Captain America is dead!

    His friend,

    Captain Obvious.

  61. Truer than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  62. Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was defeated by Batman. No one beats Batman.

    NO ONE. He's the goddamn Batman.

  63. He'll stay as dead as Jean Grey. by mad.frog · · Score: 1

    Obligatory reference to "X-Men: Death Becomes Them"

    http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/218160

    "Oh, like none of you have ever died before!"

  64. Ultimate Cap still alive by Belgand · · Score: 1

    While the main universe Captain America may be dead the thing being ignored is that the Ultimate universe Captain America is still, apparently, alive. It's just that since Mark Millar is so busy writing the excerable Civil War (although, honestly, I haven't read it, I avoid these cross-overs like the plague) and never managing to get it out on time that he can't be bothered to not write The Ultimates and fail to get it out on time.

    1. Re:Ultimate Cap still alive by NealokNYU · · Score: 1
      Actually, Millar has been done for a while. On both Ultimates and Civil War, it's the respective artists who have been the source of delay behind the titles. Joe Quesada or Tom Brevoort said in a Wizard interview they were going to be patient with Steve McNiven's artistic delays because the ripples of this crossover would be felt for so long that they wanted to make sure the books that composed the main line were of sterling artistic quality.

      I'm surprised by the overall comic book ignorance of the Slashdot audience. I'm not saying it's a bad thing; every second I read Amazing Spider-Man is a second I'm not reading a piece of literature without pictures to accompany it, and I know it. But I guess I expected more, um, nerdiness here at the site which posts news for nerds. The complicated issues with the Marvel Civil War, the war on terror in the real world, the relevance to a post 9/11 world, the Japanese internment camps of World War II... all this stuff is addressed at several angles in the Civil War cross-over books. I agree that demanding readers shell out so much for "spillover" material is corporate greed and editorial excess, but I'm surprised people really seem to be unaware of the comparative renaissance superhero comic books are seeing in terms of writing these days.

      Certainly, Western mainstream comic books are male power fantasies by their very nature, but that's not such an awful thing. I mean... So is the Iliad in a lot of ways. Many of the most popular writers in comic books right now have backgrounds in indie comics, and they bring that sensibility to their mainstream work. Sure, some writers still employ the ham-fisted prose of older comics-- Brubaker, Byrne, and Claremont spring to mind-- but in a wildly unsubtle medium, there is a lot of strikingly nuanced work pouring out of the minds of Bendis, Stracynzki, Millar, Morrison, Ennis, Ellis, Loeb, Vaughn, Whedon, and Johns.[1] (To say nothing of Gaiman, Moore, and Miller.)

      I started collecting comics in the early 90's. Like a lot of you, I quit around the the collectible cards, foil covers, seventeenth print runs, and Image struck. I discovered Neil Gaiman's Sandman and Alan Moore's Watchmen, and it occurred to me that perhaps some comics could be taken seriously. (I was against the idea with steely intensity for a long time because, "I read Kant. I read Tom Wolfe. I read the Aeneid in Latin. I don't read fucking comic books." Man, was I a prick.) It really is a different landscape because it seems there are far more writers helming the stories these days. If you can overcome the considerable hurdles innate to this slice of the medium-- i.e. the male power fantasy thing, the lack of permanence, the melomelomelodramatic stakes, etc.-- I think you'll find the writing is a lot stronger than most of the people posting are giving credit.

      [1] On the off-chance I sparked a narrow crevice in a narrow Slashdot mind, I'll give some reading recommendations. With any luck, the flames I receive for leaving people out or endorsing certain books will result in a wider array of recommended reading!

      Bendis - Almost anything. He lapses occasionally in Ultimate Spider-Man, but his writing is never, ever as poor as Ed Brubaker (of Uncanny X-Men and, yes, Captain America fame.)

      Stracynzki - Supreme Power #1-18. He's dreadfully uneven, but Supreme Power demands attention.

      Millar - Superman: Red Son, Ultimates, The Authority... almost anything, really.

      Morrison - He's weird. But he's a good writer. Sometimes. The Xorn thing in X-Men, the whole thing with Magneto being addicted to drugs, the whole Age of Apocalypse thing... meh... he reaches pretty far, and it's not always good. Check out his work on JLA, Animal Man, The Authority, and, say, the first 25 issues of New X-Men.But it often is. He's sort of like Tom Robbins or Cormic McCarthy. Sure, I think they're nuts, and I'd

  65. Jack Bauer Dies on 24 This Season! (?) by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Again? *yawn* Well, I guess third time's the charm.

    (Mild sacrilege coming up: Jesus died to save the world from its sins and arose from the dead on the 3rd day. Jack Bauer died to save the world and was back on his feet in 20 minutes. And he's done it twice.)

  66. Not buying it by albionexile · · Score: 1

    They just put a lot of plot time into bringing the Red Skull back to life. So they're going to kill off Captain America just as his nemesis is getting back into the game? I don't think so.

  67. Catch me now, I'm Falling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kept hearing the lyrics to that old Kinks song in my head over and over today.

  68. oh please by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're either an idiot, 10 years old, or just have amnesia. The Democans are just the same as the Republicrats.

    Nader was a complete fucking idiot for saying that six years ago, before My Pet Goat, Katrina, Iraq, waterboarding, wiretapping, etc etc. Saying there's no difference now makes Nader, as incredibly stupid as he was at the time, look like a genius by comparison.

    1. Re:oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Nader was a complete fucking idiot for saying that six years ago, before My Pet Goat, Katrina, Iraq, waterboarding, wiretapping, etc etc. Saying there's no difference now makes Nader, as incredibly stupid as he was at the time, look like a genius by comparison.

      Write that down on a piece of paper. Put it away until 2012. When, not if, the Dems take the House, Senate, and Presidency in 2008, they'll get to use all the tools Bush put in place for them. And you'll find out just how wrong you were. (You'll know how we former Bush supporters feel now.)

    2. Re:oh please by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Write that down on a piece of paper. Put it away until 2012. When, not if, the Dems take the House, Senate, and Presidency in 2008, they'll get to use all the tools Bush put in place for them. And you'll find out just how wrong you were. (You'll know how we former Bush supporters feel now.)

      Bullshit. Bush is by far the worst president in at least living memory, stop trying to rationalize it with "Democrats are just as bad" arguments. I say again: Nader was an idiot for spouting that in 2000, and that was before all of Bush's fuckups and shenanigans.

  69. Call for Rorschach by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Better get out the word that someone might be killing costumed crimefighters.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  70. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't even the first time he's "died".

  71. If parent is a troll, then troll = truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If parent is a troll, then troll = truth.

  72. about that second amendment by mikemcc · · Score: 1

    "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

    A good friend of mine asked me to think about a country where the citizens were well armed, had formed militias, and were taking responsibility for the defense of their communities.

    Iraq in 2007 fails only the "well regulated" part of the above definition.

    1. Re:about that second amendment by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'm not that keen on the idea of the average idiot having semi-automatic weapons[1], but the people who spout that "bear arms" thingy will love your example - the Iraqis aren't doing that bad in "fighting off the evil US Gov".

      Basically the US did a bad job of attempting to take over Iraq. At the beginning they basically told the Iraqi military "Get lost" - and these are people with weapons who are used to following orders (e.g. from Saddam). Should have just set things up so they follow your orders, but no... the US sends them off and they end up following other people's orders. Nothing was or is being done to win over the population, in fact more seems to be done to _antagonize_ the local populace. Rape, random unjustified killings.

      [1] Maybe I'm elitist.

      Still, guess who let Bush in for a 2nd term? And you'd trust these with semi-automatic weapons?

      --
    2. Re:about that second amendment by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Switzerland
      Israel
      Finland to a lesser degree.

    3. Re:about that second amendment by corbettw · · Score: 1

      If it was ordinary private citizens in Iraq with the arms, things probably wouldn't be as bad as they are. Instead, the guns are being used by militias who are loyal to their capo, and terrorist groups who are loyal to theirs. So they end up fighting each other, and the Iraqis cops and army and the US army, with innocents caught in the crossfire.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:about that second amendment by Abreu · · Score: 1

      [/HaHaOnlySerious]

      Well, considering the ammount of funding it gets from the USA, Israel is close to becoming its 51st state

      [/HaHaOnlySerious]

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  73. More suitable hero found! by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Apparently Captain America no longer symbolised the new American ideals.

    Instead, he will be replaced by The Punisher:

    "...the Punisher is a vigilante who considers killing, kidnapping, extortion, coercion, threats of violence and torture as acceptable crime-fighting tactics."

    [Source: Wikepedia]

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:More suitable hero found! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably you intended this as a joke, but that already happened in a 'What if...' story a while back.

  74. Introducing.. by sqldr · · Score: 1

    Captain Wales! Fighting evil and supervillians in the valleys!

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  75. The real reason for his death by DrXym · · Score: 1

    So they can coin it in when he is resurrected.

  76. I'm reading to be beaten to death now... but... by Churla · · Score: 1

    With the continuing villification of steroid use in society how long was a guy who basically got so juiced up by the government in the 40's that he literally survived being frozen in a block of ice and STILL woke up to be an Uber-mench supposed to fly?

    Also I agree with the "Irony of fighting against the government to save America" being the real thing which did him in.

    On the topic of super heroes dying, there was a great riff on this in the She Hulk series where She Hulk needs to have the testimony of a ghost in court in order to clear someone of a murder rap. The court of course doesn't believe the testimony of a dead person to be viable, so she brings in The Thing and asks him "How many times have you died?" ergo proving that death is a temporary condition and shouldn't prevent someone from testifying in court.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  77. Subtract ~19 years in suspended animation = ~71 by objekt · · Score: 1

    from wikipedia link, above:

    In 1945, during the closing days of World War II, Captain America and Bucky try to stop the villainous Baron Zemo from destroying an experimental drone plane. Zemo launches the plane with an armed explosive on it, with Rogers and Barnes in hot pursuit. They reach the plane just before it takes off, but when Bucky tries to defuse the bomb, it explodes in mid-air. The young man is believed killed, and Rogers is hurled into the freezing waters of either the North Atlantic or the English Channel (accounts differ). Neither body is found, and both are presumed dead.[22] ...
    He [returned] in The Avengers #4 (March 1964), which story explained that in the final days of WWII, Captain America fell from an experimental drone plane into the North Atlantic Ocean and spent decades frozen in a state of suspended animation.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  78. Some of you aren't getting it... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    Don't you see? With "Cap" dead, now we must become Cap. That's the point.
     
      Avengers, Assemble!

  79. Liefeld to blame? by mblase · · Score: 1

    I heard he died of breast cancer.

  80. Now is the time for CAPTAIN DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Empowered with the light of the patents and the congress and the Big Companys.
    He will prosecute the infamous piracy.

  81. Character Deaths -The Return of Captain Marvel by JimatForemat · · Score: 1
    About 20 years ago or so, Marvel comics killed off fellow commissioned officer Captain Mar-Vell, and made a big noise about how he was actually dead and wouldn't be coming back.

    It's interesting to me that they kill off a big character like Captain America while simultaneously bringing Captain Marvel back to life (though still riddled with the cancer that will eventually kill him again), the very character they claimed would always be dead.

    At this point, Marvel's comics are subsidized by Hollywood, existing as a kind of incubation chamber for the next Summer movie. They need to breathe some life into the old characters, and the easiest way to do that and to grab headlines is to kill off a major icon.

    I think it's a great idea.

  82. Sexual Harassment vs Rape by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

    You post extreme examples from combat zones. If you have no opinion on Iraq, why not pick examples that include the troops in the US (perhaps Tailhook or the USAF Academy)? So, to not put words in your mouth....do you want the troops to remain in Iraq? In perpetuity?

    And your example does not work....Perhaps yelling at someone that you will kill them vs pointing a firearm at them would work. Both are threats...one is more extreme than the other. Your example causes physical harm in both cases (and both would likely be treated as criminal).

    The law HAS to draw a line somewhere. One level is criminal, the other civil. Even among the two levels, the law further refines distinctions. This is how we show a person is responsible for their actions. By comparing their actions to the "reasonable person" standard, and then look at any other factors (ie is it connected to employment in some way? This is required for sexual harassment under EEOC guidelines and the law). Simply reading Maxim magazine in the park does not equate to sexual harassment, but at work it is likely to if someone complains. But if you grab the genitals of anyone (if it was not welcomed!), no matter if it were in a job location, you will have committed sexual assault.