Slashdot Mirror


Vista Can Run Without Activation for a Year

An anonymous reader gave us a heads up on this article for people who like putting things off. It begins: "Windows Vista can be run for at least a year without being activated, a serious end-run around one of Microsoft's key anti-piracy measures, Windows expert Brian Livingston said today. Livingston, who publishes the Windows Secrets newsletter, said that a single change to Vista's registry lets users put off the operating system's product activation requirement an additional eight times beyond the three disclosed last month. With more research, said Livingston, it may even be possible to find a way to postpone activation indefinitely."

357 comments

  1. And how long.... by Tanuki64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...does it run with activation key? SCNR :-)

    1. Re:And how long.... by jkrise · · Score: 3, Funny

      Until Service Pack 1 comes out.
      Or until you insert an Ubuntu CD.
      Or until you stop the messy Windows Update service.
      Or you keep posting negative comments about Microsoft on Slashdot.

      whichever is earlier.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:And how long.... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0

      Well, heck. If that's the case, does anyone know how to remove the activation key from Vista?

  2. Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since microsoft have made it perfectly clear that they don't want anyone running their OS without paying, why continue to try, how about giving one of the many shiny desktop linux distros a go instead?

    1. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2

      Yeah zactly. It's funny what people will put up with because they think they have to. If they only knew that if they organized they could wield power...

      Put Gentoo CD in drive, install, no need for license key bullshit. When I get bored I play the piano, or if music isn't my fancy I turn on the xbox and play something. No need to pay the Vista tax to play video games.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Why bother? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is what they say, but I don't think that's true. They rather have me running Vista illegally than running Linux legally. Why? Because it increases their market share, which in turn benefits to them. I am also more likely to choose Windows in my business decisions or demand Windows Vista from my employer because "that is what I know".

      For students and poorer people they damn well want them to pirate Vista.... They might one day become paying customers.

      Piracy is a form of advertisement, as odd as it may sound.

      (I run Debian Etch, thank you very much)

    3. Re:Why bother? by bjoeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because a load of games are still not being made for shiny desktop linux distros.

      Yes you may have Cedega, Wine and such, but they do not always perform well or able to run every game for that matter.

      And yes, there are still loads of non-console gamers in the world and unfortunaly not all of them are willing to pay for Windows, and ReactOS is still Alpha.

    4. Re:Why bother? by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      In my case, I'd rather pay $200 or $300 every 2-3 years for windows on my machine than have Linux for free. I've just had too many bad experiences with Linux (and no, I'm not just talking about back in 2000, I'm talking about as recently as attempts from june to september or october of last year, and periodic attempts every six months to a year prior to that as early as 2001 or 2002).

      If I didn't have the money, and didn't know about FreeBSD, I probably /would/ pirate Windows so that I could have something useful and functional, or more likely than that, just use an older version that I legitimately have a copy of.

      Linux is definetly better than it used to be, and for people who don't administrate their systems (i.e. call on family and friends to do it), it's a perfectly fine OS, but for some people who administrate their own systems, it can still be a challange in a lot of ways.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    5. Re:Why bother? by abundance · · Score: 1

      Hey! A piano and a xbox cost more than Vista...

    6. Re:Why bother? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Because I can not run the applications I need to work? like SPSS.

      And no, i wont use R. I tried believe me but I would need to spend another two months of my PhD in order to learn another programming language just to make some ANOVAS, MANCOVAS, T tests and F-tests.

      And no, it does not work under wine.

      And no, I wont buy the *overkill* packages like Matlab or mathematica even if they are avaiable vor linux.
      And no the open source "versions" of SPSS (namely PSPP) are crap at best, as with most of Open source projects, they *start* fine but they are halted after the planning and a bit of developing have been done and the developer gets bored.

      And yeah, I know I can run it in Windows XP. I will do that, this post is just a descriptive example of why people would get Vista instead of Linux, when the applications they use become available for Vista and then they become available ONLY for vista.

      MMD-IDGAF

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:Why bother? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      You are underestimating "Familiarity".... Besides, it's not just IT people that pirate. I've seen non-IT people pirate Windows before. Quite a lot of them do.... They usually spend a bit more time and get viruses easier, but they do pirate Windows.

    8. Re:Why bother? by cbelle13013 · · Score: 1

      Or just pay for the OS? I assume most people who spend their time trying to crack windows and not pay for it are the computer types and not the mother-in-law types. For $300, over the course of 5 years, thats incredibly cheap to have something that will (for the most part) work out of the box, provide easy access to updates, and generally install most programs correctly. I've used cracked versions of 2000 and XP, and both of them can be a pain without having the latest service packs, or waiting for the service packs to be cracked for install.

      On the other hand, Ubuntu is great and thats what Dell should go with!

    9. Re:Why bother? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's not just IT people that pirate

      My wife and I both use laptops which dual boot WindowsXP and Ubuntu. She has to run a windows application for her work and it doesn't work under wine so I got the free vmware player but got stuck because you need the commercial version to create a virtual disk.

      At work we run Suse+vmware+windowsXP so I asked around in the IT department at work and got some good advice about working with vmware but the windows guys in IT acted like I was an abusive husband for giving my S.O. Linux to use and offered me vmware xp images from their network to take home.

      I said thanks but I prefer to run my own copies of the OS, mainly because I can reinstall it any time I want. But the attitude of these guys was just take it, we don't care which surprised me a lot.

    10. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Piano doesn't come with WGA. And I don't need a DRM key to play pieces out of a book :-)

      That automatically tips the favour to the piano.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree, more, this is the reason why Adobe doesn't bother with decent anti piracy measures in their software and Microsoft's solutions are decidedly half-baked, users continuing to use pirated software instead of investigating Free alternatives works nicely for those with the existing market presence.

    12. Re:Why bother? by douggyFresh · · Score: 1

      We got free copies of Vista here, and it lasted about a week or so before we reverted back to XP (with the NT ui).
      Some people just gotta meddle with things and break it. If I wanted a Mac I would have bought one.
      It might be worth upgrading to VISTA Enterprise Server - no one in their right mind would put a graphic intentsive UI on a racked server in a lights off server room; no one would buy IIS7 if it was slower than IIS6!
      So Vista free for a year - will it stay on your PC that long? For those who went to DevWeek2007 in London you would have got loads of feedback from those using Vista versa XP.
      It might well be different if you you could check a tick box and have it run in lean mode or uncheck it if I wanted a christmas tree/disco of a PC.

      That aside. Try doing pro C# development on it - boy you are gomma be frustrated. Why click once when you can click twice? Why have security pop-ups jumping up when one half of the OS talks to the other. There is no profile settings for "granny knows best" to be unchecked.
      So when Vista has SP2 then I will think about it. Well try the Vista Server (IIS7 being the main motivator as that is way cool) but not on a PC that matters.
      It would be interesting to see how well Vista 'Vanillia' might sell - or is 'lean&mean' vista also known as Linix ;-)
      Just opinions.
      Someone will buy it and as long as they are happy...

    13. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      And by continuing to buy these games you perpetuate the problem. Wouldn't it be possible to run all the games you want under XP at this point? Is there a reason why you would need to pirate Vista in order to play them?

    14. Re:Why bother? by value_added · · Score: 4, Informative

      She has to run a windows application for her work and it doesn't work under wine so I got the free vmware player but got stuck because you need the commercial version to create a virtual disk.

      Maybe try using the free vmware server product and get unstuck?

    15. Re:Why bother? by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

      Better yet, why not give a Mac a try? If gaming took off seriously on the Mac then there is no reason at all to have Windows in the home. Period. OpenGL would be back in vogue, and a real competitor to DirectX. I for one would welcome Mac gaming if it was a serious contender.

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    16. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      So what's useful and functional about FreeBSD and Windows that make them better choices than Linux?

    17. Re:Why bother? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the attitude of these guys was just take it, we don't care which surprised me a lot.

      Not me... You have to realise that many IT people are not real IT people. Some just ended up on the job. They don't care about licenses. Heck, even those that studied IT often don't care. The prime task to them is: "Get it work". That this implies a pirated Windows is irrelevant to them. (Often they don't have to care because the company they work for has a Volume License anyway).

      This is mostly an ethical question. Even more so than a legal one. To me at least... I don't really care that it's illegal to pirate, but I care about not *being* a pirate. However, many people do not make that distinction: "it'll get the job done, and that is enough". I admit to pirating Windows XP (I got a volume license copy), but I slowly but surely phasing out all my illegal copies to Linux or stick with the OEM copies I have. It's one of the reasons that my brothers machine runs XP Home instead of my highly customized XP Pro installation. It came with his OEM computer and is legal... but it does give me much more grief than my customized pirated versions....

    18. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But then you're swapping one expensive proprietary system for a similarly expensive and more proprietary one, where's the sense in that? Gaming on the Mac is in a slightly worse state, for commercial titles, than gaming on Linux from what i've seen.

      At least if you're pirating vista or installing Linux you don't need to switch to another provider's hardware.

    19. Re:Why bother? by bigdavex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Put Gentoo CD in drive, install, no need for license key bullshit. When I get bored I play the piano, or if music isn't my fancy I turn on the xbox and play something.

      Right, you have to do something while it compiles.
      --
      -Dave
    20. Re:Why bother? by spisska · · Score: 2, Informative

      She has to run a windows application for her work and it doesn't work under wine so I got the free vmware player but got stuck because you need the commercial version to create a virtual disk.

      You may need the commercial VMware to create a virtual disk, but there's other free utilities that can create a virtual disk readable by VMplayer.

      For example I used qemu to create a virtual disk holding and running XP under VMplayer (free) running on FC4. Works great, and completely free.

    21. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not once gaming gets the main focus. Apple desperately wants a comeback and to make a dent this time in the Windows market. They wont ignore gaming and they may even enter the console market. Linux is a no money market in most peoples minds, most people want things for free. I dont need to pirate Vista, I can get it as an employee for piss cheap, I refuse to even use it when I can get it FREE. Now thats a telling story. (I work for Microsoft). Just ask every one of our execs except Balmer, they all prefer Macs :) Windows Vista is a work of shit.

    22. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got the free vmware player but got stuck because you need the commercial version to create a virtual disk.

      qemu-img can quite happily create VMWare VMDK disk images, and there are countless online VMWare configuration builders that allow you to create a .vmx file to go with it.

    23. Re:Why bother? by SiChemist · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been playing around with the virtualbox virtualization software. It works well on Windows and Linux and it's free for the full version.

    24. Re:Why bother? by Lunar_Lamp · · Score: 1

      I just want to agree completely with this post. SPSS is the only reason I keep my windows disks around really. I don't keep windows installed as I don't use SPSS often, but I know that every so now and then I'm going to need to crunch numbers for a week in SPSS, and when I do so, I'll just install it in VMware. You're right about the alternatives though, there's nothing that comes close yet. I guess if I needed to use it more "professionally" I would learn to use R, but as you said, that's a big outlay of time for a low return.

    25. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      So does the company make SPSS freely available to you as long as you're running windows?
      Isn't it possible that the company doesn't produce a version of the program for Linux because of a lack of demand, quietly buying and installing the windows version instead doesn't help here...

      As for pirating Vista, as you say, this isn't relevant.

    26. Re:Why bother? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Octave? . Not that I know what SPSS is, but since you compare it to Matlab and Mathematica. Octave is really good!

    27. Re:Why bother? by rucs_hack · · Score: 5, Funny

      1: Put gentoo cd in drive
      2: wade through the initial setup in the voluminous manual
      3: try to work out how the hell textmode web browsers work
      4: discover gnome won't emerge and compile because you don't have -tk set as a USE flag
      5: Try to figure out what the fuck a USE flag is anyway
      6: Spend a day trying to set up X.org
      7: mistakenly try to compile Openoffice from source
      8: wait...
      9: wait....
      10: wait....
      11: Find that your config files need updating.
      11: Realise Gnome is screwed because you updated the config files wrong
      12: Give up on Gnome, try to install KDE
      13: wait..
      14: wait....
      15: wait.....
      16: find that something you want is masked, unmask it. Smiling happily as it compiles
      17: slowly realise that you've done something very very bad...
      18: Give the fuck up and try Fedora instead

    28. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      I bet apple's release of bootcamp and a move to Intel compatible hardware will really strengthen OSX as a gaming platform... People easily installing XP on their macs to play games doesn't really do apple any favours other than to make the hardware more appealing and so easier to flogg.

    29. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um, I can use my computer while it updates software. Maybe not during the initial install, but I did that in September (when I bought this box) of last year. I don't get your point. Are you trying to be smart?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    30. Re:Why bother? by adnonRT · · Score: 1

      Let me know when WoW comes to The Xbox 360 Mmkay?

    31. Re:Why bother? by bjoeg · · Score: 1

      You know gamers. They want the newest coolest stuff. Why buy Doom4 if Doom1 runs fine?

    32. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I can install Gentoo without the manual. Once you do it a couple times it just makes sense...

      OMG do I fdisk first or format? Well think about what you're trying to do... etc...

      Granted, I agree that USE flag changes are annoying [and not always properly announced] they're not as bad as you seem to making it out. First off, why would you disable tk? If you don't want tk, tcl, etc, you don't have to install it. Putting -$THING in your USE flag is not how to not install things. It's to disable functionality in builds.

      As for the config files, tip: Always run etc-update after each emerge. I use Gnome on all of my Gentoo boxes (and laptop) and it works just fine. Setting up X.org only took a minute to add the mouse definitions and what not.

      In general, Gentoo is not meant to be "my first Linux distro (tm)," especially for the impatient types. You're probably better off with Fedora, or some Debian distro at first, learn the environment and then try it out.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    33. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it could be argued that an ubuntu, fedora, mandriva, suse, well, just about any non source system, could be up and running somewhat quicker and with less fuss than a Gentoo installation.

    34. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you buy a $150 OS just to play WoW ... Well, you tell me who is the sheep.

      Why not demand that Blizzard port it to OpenGL and other OSes so that you can have the freedom to run your computer how you see fit? Oh right, because you're their bitch.

      I'll pocket the $150 and use it to buy two months worth of private piano lessons. Much more enjoyable.

      That and WoW is just lame. It's an excuse not to socialize with others in an environment of repeated "hack and magic slash." ooh ooh gotta level up, my life isn't complete unless my paladin can cast +8 fireballs.... ooooo....

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    35. Re:Why bother? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may want to try VMware again. The free version I donwloaded allows you to make virtual disks, use physical drive, and do just about everything you would expect to be able to do with a virtual machine. I'm not sure what extra perks come with the pay version. I think you can run the pay version without a host OS, saving on resources.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    36. Re:Why bother? by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dual booting is not practical and doesnt solve the actual problem. There is a BIG drive for high speed graphics in virtual machines going on, this year and next year it will become more feasable to run games in virtual machines instaed of this dual booting gynmastics. I would prefer that they got developers signed up to target the Mac for game engines and have it done with.

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    37. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but Gentoo grants me more useful freedoms. Like the ability to build from source more recent software (like the most recent fedora is still ways behind on Gnome for instance), or configure it how I want (like to have MP3 playback).

      The other distros serve their purpose, but if the price I pay to use Gentoo how I want is that I have to do an initial install that takes a night, then it's worth it.

      I should point out though that out of the box, Fedora Core 5 takes a while to update and get usable (e.g. not vulnerable to a million and a half bugs/exploits/etc).

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    38. Re:Why bother? by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My point is that compared to simpler Linux installs, or (god forbid) windows, its a very hard thing to install, so saying that it's an alternative to Vista is sheer folly.

      And you can't install it without the manual, because they have this habit of changing things so what worked a few months ago suddenly doesn't work any more.

      I'm afraid the USE flag thing is that bad. One of the recent GUI installer releases failed completely because of a tk dependency, and even hosed some systems entirely.

      I've used gentoo for years, and I'm a fan, but I am all too aware of the risks of using it, you have to be far more careful then with other distributions.

    39. Re:Why bother? by cyclop · · Score: 1

      I think you can run the pay version without a host OS, saving on resources.

      Ehm, sir, what would be the advantage of it instead of installing on bare metal?

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    40. Re:Why bother? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      And I don't need a DRM key to play pieces out of a book :-)
      Shhh! You're giving them ideas!
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    41. Re:Why bother? by cyclop · · Score: 1

      There are also Scilab and, if you already know python and you like it, Scipy.

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    42. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Funny

      My bad.

      Piano: "You seem to be playing a nice Minuet, please insert your RIAA approved USB dongle to continue."
      Me: "I don't have a dongle, it's sheet music I bought, I'm playing it myself!!!"
      Piano: "Pirate!!! You're stealing the artists hard music, this piano will now self destruct." ... uh oh ...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    43. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I never claimed that Gentoo was for complete newcomers. And it is an alternative to Vista, just not the easiest one. For instance, I run Gentoo as opposed to other distros [and Windows]. It's my alternative.

      And yes, I agree that upon occasion Gentoo admins fark up updates. Doesn't happen too often, and sometimes it's my fault for not reading the update messages [heheheh]. This is why backups are a good idea. From a system tarball I can have my machine back in working order in under 10 minutes.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    44. Re:Why bother? by Xymor · · Score: 1

      I though it already supported opengl.

      support page

    45. Re:Why bother? by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, here's my rational. And as a background, I've had maybe a total of 10 months use/admin experience with FreeBSD, and several YEARS worth with Linux and Windows, so my oppinions of Linux/Windows are not from lack of experience with Linux/Windows, and my experience with FreeBSD may be somewhat short, at their best, all three seem equaly pleasant to admin, but when it comes down to the average or worst case, I find that's where FreeBSD shines.

      1) In both OSes, I've found installing new programs to be easier than in any distro of Linux that I've used (RH/FC, Ubuntu, Gentoo), namely less failures. Much moreso in Windows than in FreeBSD.

      2.f) In FreeBSD, when something breaks, I've found the documentation to be much better than the documentation I find in Linux, and the error messages tend to give a bit better information on finding the source of the issue. I also find things tend to break a bit less often in Linux

      2.w) In Windows, when something breaks, which is actually pretty rare in my experience (at least for 2K and XP), there's plenty of documentation online, and in the Windows help files - between the latter and Google with the right error messages pasted in, most errors I've run into aren't hard to solve/bypass

      3) The FreeBSD community, on a whole, has been more friendly, and less RTFM than the Linux community. (to me at least)

      4.f) FreeBSD is very much oriented to the server/enterprise mindset, with everything geared towards /just working/. Linux tends to be geared more towards what the devs want, which is the latest and greatest at a breakneck pace (though not necessarily with enterprise Linuxes and their derivatives - I ought try out CentOS some time, but FC has always seemed slow and bloated to me, compared to any other OS I've used, which makes me leery of anything based off of a RH distro). Each has their pros and cons (example: better hardware support, a larger selections of applications for any given task, and much nicer looking system administration utilities are major advantages for Linux), I just tend to find the BSD set of advantages more useful for me.

      4.w) Windows tries to make everything oriented towards ease of use, so that the end user can get quite a bit done without thinking too much about it. It does abstract a lot of lower level things and make them difficult to get to. Probably the reason why I don't use my Windows box any more, now that everything I need done is done on my BSD box.

      5) I find Linux is the only OS where I've spent more time trying to get things working, than with either of the other two.

      And please don't call me a moron or stupid because my oppinion and experiences with the various operating systems don't match yours. People work differently with different thigns, I am not telling anyone /not/ to use Linux, I'm just trying to say there are valid reasons people don't use Linux. People see problems and approach problems differently, and thus different methods of execution of a specific task are more or less effective for various people. FreeBSD and Windows are better for me than Linux. I can't tell you which is better for you, you have to decide on your own. I will say if you /havent/ tried it, then you certainly have no right to comment on it, and even if you have tried it, you've no right to insult me because my decisions and oppinions don't match yours. Sorry for this rant, but I've gotten that kind response from similar posts before, it's rather annoying, and it wastes both my time and the time of the writer, while providing nothing productive.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    46. Re:Why bother? by HAKdragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why not demand that Blizzard port it to OpenGL and other OSes so that you can have the freedom to run your computer how you see fit?

      All of Blizzard's 3D games (and even Diablo II), have the ability to run using OpenGL. That's how they work on the Mac. (Yes yes, I know by other OSes you probably meant Linux.)

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    47. Re:Why bother? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Sir,

      We have asked your piano tuner to forward this letter to you in advance of our filing lawsuit against you in federal court for copyright infringement under the auspices of the recently passed Copyright Act for Analog Playback (CrAAP). We represent a number of large record companies, including SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music Group, as well as all of their subsidiaries ("Record Companies,") in perusing claims of copyright infringement against individuals who have illegally played copyrighted works on their pianos to an audience.

      We have gathered evidence that you have been infringing copyrights owned by the Record Companies. We are attaching to this letter a sample of the sheet music found in your stool drawer. In total, you were found to be potentially playing to an audience 321 songs, a substantial number of which are songs controlled by the Record Companies.

      The reason we are sending you this letter to you in advance of filing suit is to give you the opportunity to settle these claims are early as possible. If you contact us within the next twenty (20) calendar days with proof that you have destroyed any mecxhanism for the analog playback of potentially copyrighted music, we will offer to settle the claims for a significantly reduced amount compared to the judgment amount a court may enter against you...

      IF WE DO NOT HEAR FROM YOU IN TWENTY (20) DAYS WE WILL FILE SUIT AGAINST YOU IN FEDERAL COURT.

      Sincerely, Douchebag McNumbnuts

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    48. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      So if your only tie to Windows is to play WoW, why not demand that WoW be ported to your OS?

      Not like Linux distro's aren't popular.

      And frankly, for WoW, the value is in the content (art, models, textures, sound, music) and the servers, not the code. If they opened the code, people could do source builds on their platforms, saving Blizzard from having to do the port.

      Just saying...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    49. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, nice. Give it time, they'll try.

      Well actually they already do, usually though for pub performers since there is usually money involved.

      Fortunately (unfortunately?) for me, I'm not good enough to play to an audience without chicken mesh. That is, unless they're into conservatory pieces (I don't play pop music that often).

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    50. Re:Why bother? by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Informative

      WoW works in Wine pretty well, so if you just want to use your comp to play WoW... get a kubuntu CD and play it...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    51. Re:Why bother? by solafide · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to read the manual anymore usually. Gentoo has a lovely smart graphical installer, and the install cd boots up into a GNOME enviroment, which has Firefox. Maybe you have weird hardware, but I haven't had any trouble with the graphical installer. And the graphical installer even installs your favorite wm for you using binary packages.

    52. Re:Why bother? by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      Since microsoft have made it perfectly clear that they don't want anyone running their OS without paying, why continue to try, how about giving one of the many shiny desktop linux distros a go instead?

      Because the thought of having my OS nag me for an entire year about activating is just so enticing! All I have to do is hack some undocumented configuration setting that some guy found, and I can then look forward to eight more months of reminders to send my data to Microsoft? SIGN ME UP!!

    53. Re:Why bother? by bberens · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but Gentoo grants me more useful freedoms. Like the ability to build from source more recent software (like the most recent fedora is still ways behind on Gnome for instance), or configure it how I want (like to have MP3 playback). Actually there's nothing stopping you from compiling and running a Gnome from source on Fedora. When I upgraded from Fedora 4 to Fedora 5 I was playing mp3s in xmms within about three commands. Other than rampant elitism or the need in an engineering environment to have an extreme level of control over every bit of disk space and processor time I really can't think of a good reason to use Gentoo over a binary based distro. Of course, this IS slashdot, so rampant elitism is probably considered an excellent reason to do anything.
      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    54. Re:Why bother? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      You'll get no such response from me. I've tried Linux and (to a limited extent) MacOS and have come back to Windows every time. I rant until I'm blue in the face at this site that Linux just doesn't work for everyone and it's rare that people listen.

      I especially love the people who tell me it's my fault for not trying hard enough on the new OS. If I have to try harder, that's not an incentive for me to change. As far as I'm concerned, it's worth me spending £70 every 3-4 years just to have something that I actually find usable rather than spend nothing on something that doesn't do the things that I want.

      Unfortunately that flies over the heads of some people.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    55. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Fair enough. And can I write to Blizzard support when the game stops working in Wine? (actually, I have no idea how good their support is so that's a half-genuine question). Point is, if I'm buying your software, paying for support and maintenance, I should be the one who gets to decide how to use it.

      And when you have games like WoW, which aren't really making any technical use of a feature that Linux or BSD can't reproduce, there is no reason why they would hinder their product as to only work on one platform.

      At anyrate, I'm not a WoW player so I won't be installing Wine anytime soon.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    56. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      1. Portage solves dependencies a lot nicer than rpm ever did. Though yum is better than rpm it's not better than Portage.

      2. Gentoo follows the projects more closely than Fedora. You stand a better chance of getting recently released software on your Gentoo box than your Fedora box.

      3. USE flags can tweak features.

      For me, I used to just use Knoppix, "cuz it worked." Until I tried to manipulate some tiff files and learned that my tools [Gimp, tetex] wouldn't work for them. One USE flag later and Gentoo was working just fine.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    57. Re:Why bother? by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      If you buy a $150 OS just to play WoW ... Well, you tell me who is the sheep.

      You're kidding right? These people pay monthly subscriptions and $8,000 on ebay for a virtual sword, virtual hair extensions, virtual blow up doll or whatever the hell people are buying nowadays. The $150 for the OS is chump change.
    58. Re:Why bother? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Ehm, sir, what would be the advantage of it instead of installing on bare metal?
      How about not having to co-ordinate the monthly re-boot of 8 virtual machines with the reboot of the host because the host is running windoze too. ESX (currently based on Linux 2.4 kernel) as a much sparser update cycle and the fixes are far less likely to be critical security issues exposing you to a 0 day vulnerability. Far better people than I have ranted on the advantage of OS diversity. Exercise you favorite search engine for additional points.
      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    59. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I think those represent the minority of WoW players. Most just play their characters and go about their business.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    60. Re:Why bother? by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      ahh, that's one of the reason I made note of my experience time with the three OSes. I figured FreeBSD was the right choice pretty quickly.

      It's a good OS if you don't mind one that requires a bit of typing to do maintenance, and don't mind reading documents for a couple of hours on system maintenance tasks initially so that you know how things "work" and "are done". If you are familiar with the standard unix command line tools, then it's pretty easy, you just need to understand how the application build process works if you want to build your own apps (or thei package system works if you want to use that, which I usually don't).

      I like the fact that these three commands, are all in need to install most useful applications, and the fact that there's a ncie directory to search through to find what apps are available for what you want (gentoo has some of these features, and it's the closest thing I find to a Linux distro that is sufficiently useable for me):
      make install clean #build a program and the programs it needs to run
      make batch install clean #likewise, but use the default options, don't promt for stuff
      make config-recursive install clean #prompt for options en-mass first, then install, nice for large ports (ex: KDE) that you want to install and fiddle with some options

      very few programs don't "just work" after that. Outside of that, the trick is to make sure you don't try to install multiple conflicting packages. When I was uncertain about stuff, I used to say "just put it all in" - that bit me in the but when I tried to install every Kerberos implementation for KDE - PAM, Heimdal, Kerb5, and one other that I can't remember the name of.

      However very few is not all. And sometimes I need to get help - ex: my TV Tuner driver. But the people on the newsgroup and the port maintainer were nice enough, gave me advice, and even that works now.

      It's not for everyone, I know plenty of people who /could/ handle it and would still prefer Windows, I know plenty of people who have used them all extensively and prefer Linux (or MacOS to add another to the pot). *Shrug* it's a matter of how you work as to which suits you.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    61. Re:Why bother? by lukisi · · Score: 1

      >And no the open source "versions" of SPSS (namely PSPP) are crap at best,
      > as with most of Open source projects, they *start* fine but they are halted
      > after the planning and a bit of developing have been done and the developer
      > gets bored.

      If you really want to see an open source project go beyond the initial stage,
      when the developer gets bored, you and other interested users could:
      1 get in touch,
      2 raise some money,
      3 fund further development from who you want.

      I'm serious.
      http://www.italy.fsfeurope.org/documents/rms-fs-20 06-03-09.en.html#directly-funding-free-software-de velopment

      --Luca

    62. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      *shhh*, watch yourself, he might funroll your loops!

    63. Re:Why bother? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Do tell! Why does Linux "suck" so much "ass" that it warrants calling the positively huge pool of developers "untalented" and "stupid"?

      Are you sure it's not a case of the everyone-is-stupid/different/weird-but-me syndrome?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    64. Re:Why bother? by SixArmedJesus · · Score: 1

      I can install Gentoo without the manual. Once you do it a couple times it just makes sense...

      But who wants to install it more than once? If it's a hobby to install Linux over and over, then fine, you have a point, but I would think most people would want to install it once and then be able to actually USE the computer for quite some time.

      I'm not really trying to be snarky about this. I'm just saying that the only time you should have to reinstall an OS is either if you keep picking at it until it just breaks, or when a new version comes out. For things like Gentoo and Arch, they're only pseudo-releases anyway. Once installed, it's a rolling release system. I would actually think that, if anything, Gentoo would be something you would install the LEAST number of times because of this.

      --

      *slight crashing sound*
    65. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Hint: some of us own more than one box. At one point I had a laptop and several desktops (all different platforms). I've also had disks die, and I've installed Gentoo for friends.

      TOM

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    66. Re:Why bother? by megabyte405 · · Score: 1

      http://www.easyvmx.com/ is your VMWare Player friend :)

      --
      I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
    67. Re:Why bother? by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      Funny, my experience with Fedora was pretty much like that. Of course the details were different. Dependency hell instead of USE flags. Instead of spending hours compiling, I spent hours looking for documentation (and I still failed). Eventually you realize that your going to have to compile it yourself cause none of the rpm's work, and then all hell breaks lose. You need to find all the dev packages for all the dependencies get the gcc, hope to God you're version of libc or whatever is correct. Finally I gave up and used Gentoo instead.

    68. Re:Why bother? by lantastik · · Score: 1

      I can actually confirm this. When I was young and poor I pirated pretty much everything. Now that I am older and making a comfortable living in the software industry, I support the makers of the software I use by paying for it.

      I know this sounds like advocacy for piracy, but it's not. I was wrong and I have even paid for licenses of software I don't even use anymore if I used pirated copies for any extended period of time. I am also very much an advocate of OSS. If you don't want to pay for Photoshop, don't pirate it, use GIMP. It's a great tool that will only get better with the more people that use it. That is just one example of the free alternatives to very expensive software.

    69. Re:Why bother? by ai3 · · Score: 1

      19. ...
      20. Profit??

    70. Re:Why bother? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      They rather have me running Vista illegally than running Linux legally. Oddly, that's what I thought too. Great minds think alike.... but then again, so do stupid ones :-)

      Anyhow, don't expect MS to admit that any time soon though.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    71. Re:Why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but Gentoo grants me more useful freedoms. Like the ability to build from source more recent software (like the most recent fedora is still ways behind on Gnome for instance), or configure it how I want (like to have MP3 playback).

      I'm not aware of any distribution that prevents you from compiling software and installing it to /usr/local.

      Perhaps you could explain how Gentoo enables you to do this better than others.

      Many masked ebuilds are masked because they don't work. So you end up downloading the original distribution many times anyway.

      This is why I finally gave up and went to Ubuntu. The optimization aspect of Gentoo only matters on wonky platforms for which there are not already optimized builds. If I want something special I can always build it myself. But if I had a K6 or something, I'm sure I'd be doing a stage 1 gentoo. But I've divested myself of all hardware slower than 700MHz so far (except a doorstop mac, which I use for a doorstop) and I'm working on raising that number.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      When installing from source do they also build dependencies from source too?

      Sure you can type "make install" but with Portage [and ports] dependencies are built as well.

      Nobody runs Gentoo because they get to build software, they use it because it's relatively easy to install packages and their depends, and also to configure them as you want.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    73. Re:Why bother? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      If you are familiar with the standard unix command line tools, then it's pretty easy, you just need to understand how the application build process works if you want to build your own apps As someone once said;

      Unix: Some say the learning curve is steep, but you only have to climb it once. -- Karl Lehenbauer.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    74. Re:Why bother? by adnonRT · · Score: 1

      Support for Linux has been asked for several hundred times by now. The company does not want to port it for whatever reason. (they have issues statements as to why a few times...all vague) However taking the stance that I won't buy their product just so they know I want it on linux isn't going to accomplish a damned thing for me. The bottom line is that Most games are made for the windows platform. It's the only reason there is a windows box in my house. My other two boxes, including my wife's are either Mac OSX or Linux distros. Be that as it may, some of the posters here are right, Linux takes work and anyone who has been doing it for a while knows this. Certainly more work to use than a windows machine. Despite the reasons behind that being the case, it is still the case. And yes, all of you nix nuts are the main reason why so many newbies don't even try. Because flames and calls of idiocy are all newbies hear. Why deal with that? P.S. Did you seriously reference MMO's with being anti-social? And then you went on to reference a +8 stat? O_O Dude.....when was the last time you even SAW an MMO? Ultima online? AS far as I know...MMO's involve people from all over.....and umm yeah...talking to them over vent and such to get stuff done and socialize. Hell, I have met three RL friends through wow who live in my city and quite a few others who live in places ranging from Canada to UK. I visit them as often as my money allows and engage in 'social' activities with them. Seriously, try to keep up with the times. I don't exactly see what is so social about playing 4 minute rounds online through Xbox live or sitting alone at your piano playing it. Diversions are diversions. I use the tools necessary to have my diversions. Linux is not one of them. Yes I could use Wine, sometimes I do when I don't feel like messing around with the win box at home, but most of the time, my gaming rig is my tool of choice for gaming. I will continue to ask them to port to linux, as I always do, but I am sure it will continue to be ignored until ONE of the distros becomes 'mainstream'.

    75. Re:Why bother? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Um, because Linux has sucked ass since the day it was unleashed from the putrid minds of untalented, stupid developers? Sucks ass? Linux must be the one at the front, then.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    76. Re:Why bother? by tlacuache · · Score: 1

      My wife and I both use laptops which dual boot WindowsXP and Ubuntu. She has to run a windows application for her work and it doesn't work under wine so I got the free vmware player but got stuck because you need the commercial version to create a virtual disk.

      You could give VirtualBox a try. There are two releases available to you: a free-as-in-freedom GPL'ed version and a free-as-in-beer closed-source version that has a few extra bells and whistles. I installed it and had a Windows virtual machine running in no time.
    77. Re:Why bother? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Try out the portupgrade set of tools, I think you'll like them. They're now pretty "standard" to use for installing and upgrading FreeBSD ports and simplify everything you'd commonly do with a FreeBSD port.

      portupgrade -rR apache (or whatever) works really well for ensuring dependencies, correctly compatible versions, etc... If you don't specify the version it picks the lates for the major version you have installed or else it asks which version you want, etc...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    78. Re:Why bother? by Andrei+D · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it's the other way around.
      1. Install Fedora
      2. Try to figure out why it hangs during the bootup process
      3. Boot into single mode
      4. Remove with chkconfig all the bluetooth and zeroconf junk
      5. Repeat 3 and 4 after it finally boots.
      6. Try to yum install anything
      7. Wait...
      8. Wait...
      9. Wait...
      10. Try to figure out why yum doesn't find anything useful
      11. Add 3rd party repositories.
      12. yum install anything
      13. RPM HELL!
      14. Give the fuck up and install Gentoo.

      --
      We often refuse to accept an idea merely because the tone of voice in which it has been expressed is unsympathetic to us
    79. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      OMG use paragraphs.

      That aside, I don't subscribe to the "it's the way it is" scenario. There are other things to do than shell out money to companies that don't respect your freedoms. They're doing something wrong. Plain and simple. And you don't reward them because it's familiar and comfortable.

      As to your comment about MMOs, the only [and last] one I played was Champions of Norrath. Single player sucks, multiplayer wasn't much more fun. Granted the graphics are nice and the music well done, the "hack and slash" crap is really boring after 5 minutes. oh look, another moving object, I wonder what I do, oh I know, hack and slash it. Boring.

      I'm not against playing games though. I'm just against making excuses for poor business practices because you can't control yourself.

      tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    80. Re:Why bother? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it's recursive are you?

      Watch out, or some BSD hack will prove us both wrong...

    81. Re:Why bother? by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with them, which I use depends on what I'm doing. I usually use portupgrades when I need to fix a screwup..

      ex: is had a flag in my make.conf that dind't break anything but made some parts of KDE unstable - rather than finding the package and rebuilding, I just did a portupgrade -Rf x11/kde3 (or was it -rf? I can never remember, I always check that on the man page - I wouldn't use one of the two, too unpredictable what would be installed)

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    82. Re:Why bother? by misleb · · Score: 1

      7: mistakenly try to compile Openoffice from source


      Haha. That is so funny because I made that mistake. I had no idea what was gettign into. An hour into the build on my P4 2Ghz machine i was franticly trying to free up space on the partition where it was building just so it wouldn't fail and I'd have to start over. I eventually gave up and went back to Debian.

      Gentoo
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    83. Re:Why bother? by norminator · · Score: 1

      You are obviously a retard. I can set up a gentoo system in under an hour. I never have any of the problems you listed there.

      Good for you. That's too bad that you got your feelings hurt because you didn't think about the context of the GPP. Were you able to install Gentoo in under an hour the first time? Was Gentoo your first experience at installing and using Linux?

      I use Gentoo on my MythTV box at home, and it's working quite well. In the past, I have installed Gentoo from the command line and from the LiveCD GUI. I've botched things up sometimes and abandoned the install, sometimes I've botched them up then figured it out and set things right, but that always took some time and some googling. If I wouldn't have had a 2nd functional computer around I would have been screwed. Oh, and I run Ubuntu on my laptop. The right tool for the right job.

      I know, I'm feeding a troll, but his point wasn't that Gentoo is bad, just that Gentoo is for people who really want Gentoo Linux. It's not for the vast majority of computer users (I said "users", not "hobbyists"). Ubuntu, OpenSuse, and others are much more suited to the general population of computer users. If my neighbor who knows just a little bit about computers wants to try linux out, I'll point him to Ubuntu. Maybe I'll tell him Gentoo exists, but I won't suggest it to him until he's really had some time getting to know Linux. I know Gentoo has a live CD-based graphical installer, but I've used it, and it's still not for beginners.

      The original post mentioning Gentoo was as a generic alternative to Vista. The GP pointed out that there's a lot of steps and potential for complications. Just because you don't have those problems doesn't mean that people in general won't have problems.

      Gentoo is very good in a lot of ways, and it's a great distribution for a number of things. It's just not a good distro to wean people off of Windows.
    84. Re:Why bother? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Many folks who loathe certain companies are quite happy to prod them into continuing a self-defeating strategy that will worsen their customers experience.
      Others just do not care and want free stuff.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    85. Re:Why bother? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      True, and I'm even worse: I contribute money to open source projects. Yes, I have donated to OpenOffice.org, OpenBSD and to some other minor open source projects. I like *that* better than paying for commercial software.

    86. Re:Why bother? by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      Actually there's nothing stopping you from compiling and running a Gnome from source on Fedora.

      Yes, but it's a lot more involved than emerge -u gnome.

      When I upgraded from Fedora 4 to Fedora 5

      Back when I was distro shopping, I would try a different distro every time an upgrade was due. I landed on gentoo largely because there weren't huge, periodical, system-wide upgrades. Individual packages are updated when they come out.

      I was playing mp3s in xmms within about three commands.

      I wasn't even aware that this was still an issue for Linux. Gentoo handles that sort of thing automatically.

      Other than rampant elitism or the need in an engineering environment to have an extreme level of control over every bit of disk space and processor time I really can't think of a good reason to use Gentoo over a binary based distro.

      One thing you may not have thought of is there are several enhanced security features such as stack smash protection that must be compiled in. I don't know about the current state of the binary distros, but when I started using those features, gentoo was the only distro that supported them for every package.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    87. Re:Why bother? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      VMware Workstation (the "for pay version") has a few advantages over the free versions of VMware Player or Server. Essentially workstation has all the features of Server (creation of new VMs, snapshotting, reconfig of virtual hardware) and Player (faster console access) in one package. VMware Infrastructure (ESX) is a more powerfull version of Server. It generally allows for more virtual servers on the same hardware. ESX also supports SANs and live migration of running VMs.

    88. Re:Why bother? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      ESX (currently based on Linux 2.4 kernel) VMware ESX is not based on Linux. ESX is vmware that runs directly on the hardware. ESX does use a version of Red Hat as a management console. It has been said that ESX uses Linux to provide some device drivers. I don't know if this is true as the list of ESX compatible hardware is different then the list of Linux compatible hardware.

    89. Re:Why bother? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      You see, most of your other comments on this article have been pretty close to agreeable but this completely misses the point.

      If I install Linux just so I can use Amarok, does that make me a sheep? Of course not, but Amarok is only available for Linux and therefore if I want to use it I can't use Windows. The only difference you can see here is money, which is totally irrelevant.

      It's not about following a trend, or being in or out of fashion. Sometimes you use what you can in order to enjoy yourself. After all, you can't play that Beethoven piece you like without a piano, can you?

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    90. Re:Why bother? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      19: Profit!

    91. Re:Why bother? by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Um, I can use my computer while it updates software. Maybe not during the initial install, but I did that in September (when I bought this box) of last year. I don't get your point. Are you trying to be smart?

      Just a joke.
      --
      -Dave
    92. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      In many cases an OSS tool doesn't exist in Windows because the developer don't run Windows, and their isn't much incentive. There are also technological reasons. For example, my pthread based application will run happily in Linux, BSD, and MacOS but requires a clunky emulation layer to work in Windows. etc...

      In the Windows case, many applications are written for Windows only, despite the draw from paying customers for Linux/MacOS/BSD ports. And they're limited not by the technological advancements of Windows, but by corporate greed. It wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft paid off popular studios to not release Linux ports of software.

      I called them sheep because people like MSFT and Blizzard tell them "that's the way it is," and they fall for it. There isn't any reason a game of the WoW genre can't exist in Linux or BSD. Other than they used Microsoft specific API hooks and are too lazy to fix it. It's one thing to decide on your own terms to use Windows. It's another to use it because they told you it's the only way to render polygons, play sound files, register mouse movements and transmit IP datagrams.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    93. Re:Why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nobody runs Gentoo because they get to build software, they use it because it's relatively easy to install packages and their depends, and also to configure them as you want.

      But masked ebuilds are entirely likely to not build/work correctly anyway, so the dependency support isn't necessarily going to help you. Especially since masked ebuilds are likely to have masked dependencies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    94. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um, I have a fully functional workstation running very recent software. None of which is masked.

      What are you talking about? Development software (e.g. beta/rc) has always been masked. That's because Gentoo admins don't want to spend time helping newbies using unfinished software.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    95. Re:Why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Um, I have a fully functional workstation running very recent software. None of which is masked.

      That's funny, I run Ubuntu, and I have the same experience.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    96. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You know, you can use Qemu to create a vmdk.... :)

    97. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol slashbots. The lack of support is a legitimate point to raise, especially given the recent accidental mass banning of Linux clients for "cheating". Don't mod flamebait just because you don't like reality.

    98. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am happy for you.

      I don't know why there is anymosity between OSS users. If ubuntu does what you want, and you chose it, all the power to you. In my case, Gentoo did what I want, and I chose it.

      I only defend my choice of Gentoo when people knock it as a go-nowhere OS. Other than that, I don't really care what OS you run so long as you choose it.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    99. Re:Why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I only defend my choice of Gentoo when people knock it as a go-nowhere OS. Other than that, I don't really care what OS you run so long as you choose it.

      I don't deny that there are uses for Gentoo. I've run it myself, and enjoyed it - on a K6/2, where every cycle counts. But I don't think that it is necessary to run Gentoo to be up-to-date.

      If you want/need support for something that's not in the default packages, gentoo makes it easiest to get it. 99% of users will never need to do that, and probably half of the remaining 1% could actually stick with whatever other dist they're using if they really understood the system.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    100. Re:Why bother? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Well, nobody should run Gentoo for the "ricer" aspect of it. And certainly, that's not why I run it.

      As an OSS developer I run a lot of random OSS tools, I also like to try stuff that isn't super mainstream. Look at Fedora (what I use at work). Most major packages are at least one release cycle behind (like Gnome) and a lot of other tools are not fully up to date (GCC 4.1.1 here not 4.1.2).

      Having not tried Ubuntu I don't know how up to date the packages are there. But I stand by my comment. It isn't "wrong" to run Gentoo just because you think Ubuntu is better. Use what serves your purpose, choose what you use.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    101. Re:Why bother? by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      It technically does, but it has (or at least had) a problem where there was a sign error in the z-coordinate (vertical coordinate) for rendering things like targeting circles. This resulted in them being displayed just beneath the terrain instead of just above it, making them, well, not visible. With that kind of commitment to OpenGL rendering quality...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    102. Re:Why bother? by stripe42 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reference to "stack smash" attacks. I run Gentoo on multiple workstations and servers, but the wife's laptop is Ubuntu. Any suggestions on determining how a binary distro, like Ubuntu, sets compiling defaults? (heh, Magic Eight Ball needs updated option "search google" hehe). Wow, I just realized I don't even know who actually makes the binaries. I've installed a couple other distros, but Gentoo's is the only one I've used day in and day out for the past 7 years.

      To bring back on topic a bit, I'm really surprised that people would prefer to run an illegal copy of software than even try a free alternative. I only see Vista succeeding via continued product lock-in, like Office and Sharepoint.


      Thanks
    103. Re:Why bother? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      But then you're swapping one expensive proprietary system [Vista] for a similarly expensive and more proprietary one [Mac OS X] It's well-known that Mac OS X is built atop, ships with, and heavily utilizes many open source projects (example, Mac OS Forge). OS X is just *brimming* with open source software. Most of the standards used directly utilize open source software behind the GUI and are based on open standards (some "de facto", most "de jure" (or whatever the technical analog is)).

      Vista Home Basic is $199. Tiger is $129. Vista Ultimate is $399. Tiger is $129.

      Gaming on the Mac is in a slightly worse state, for commercial titles, than gaming on Linux from what i've seen. Absolutely false. There's a far greater number of games ported from Windows to OS X than to Linux. There are far more Mac-only commercial games than there are Linux-only commercial games. Then, of course, there's always Boot Camp (which *is* one aspect of "gaming on the Mac", less so as WINE and related projects mature on OS X).

      Additionally, OS X can play, essentially, all open source Linux games.

      At least if you're pirating vista or installing Linux you don't need to switch to another provider's hardware. Although your implication is factually incorrect (if you want to include "piracy", you can pirate OS X and run it on a standard PC), your point is taken, and is the only one that's really all that accurate. Apple makes some really great hardware, and is priced very competitively compared with similar PC offerings. If that's a deal-breaker for you, then so be it. But for increasingly many people, this is being shown to not be much of a problem.
    104. Re:Why bother? by freedomlinux · · Score: 1

      Exactly to which "most recent fedora" are you referring? You talk about poor usage of Gnome, but then are talking about upgrading to Fedora Core 5. If this is what you meant to do, please refrain in the future from comparing the latest Gentoo with the Fedora which is two releases behind. (Yes, I have used Gentoo, and no, I am not a Fedora fanboy)

    105. Re:Why bother? by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      don't expect MS to admit that any time soon

      I guess there is a reason to also read Digg...
      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    106. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They rather have me running Vista illegally than running Linux legally. Why?

      Because if you ever come into any real money, they can send in one of their publically funded departments to shake you down. If you are using Linux, they have to pay for the shakedown out of their own pockets.

    107. Re:Why bother? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Except I gave up at the 'compiling gcc' stage, after about 3 days (P3/750). It hadn't even started to install the applications I wanted, and after 3 whole days I still didn't have a usable system. However, after 3.1 days I did - yup, good old debian took only an hour or so to banish gentoo. And I had 800MB more hard disk space too, due to not having to cache the entire library of congress in /useless/pottage .

      The "Gentoo users get to learn how linux works" falacy was blown out of the water after I investigated the choices behind which if the three crons I should install. The Gentoo forums were laughably devoid of information, and even more laughably full of unambiguous proof that no-one actually knew anything about the differences.

      Phil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    108. Re:Why bother? by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      Errr this is almost exactly what I did except half the time I didn't know what I was setting up or what was going wrong. Yes, Gentoo was my first attempt at installing a Linux distro. I wanted to be cool and skip the more user friendly distros. I remember there were 3 different types of installs and I tried to pick what I thought was the easiest one. I didn't touch another distro for a long time after that. That was about 5 years ago so it was probably a lot worse then. I swore that some day I would return and defeat the Gentoo installation. I've almost tried again but I usually end up playing a game instead.

    109. Re:Why bother? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Did MS actually say that they'd rather people used illegal copies of Windows than legal copies of Linux? The article kind of implies that this is what they'd want, but MS themselves don't actually say that (or indeed even address that specific issue).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    110. Re:Why bother? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      The only thing that's wrong about piracy is that it supports inferior proprietary software over superior Free alternatives. There's no reason to be guilted into giving these unethical software hoarders money, just stop using their stuff.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    111. Re:Why bother? by wolf31o2 · · Score: 1

      1: Put gentoo cd in drive
      2: wade through the initial setup in the voluminous manual Uhh... Except that there's an Installer now, so everything else you've said here is complete and utter crap.

      What I also find funny is that the only arguments that people can give against Gentoo is that the install takes a long time, which has not been the case since around 2003, when Gentoo started the GRP (Gentoo Reference Platform) method of installation. Sure, you can do a stage1 installation and take days building your system if you have nothing better to do or are simply misinformed, but the recommended installation method is using the Installer, which takes somewhere around 20 minutes to have a complete GNOME workstation up and running for me.
    112. Re:Why bother? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      The installer had still got some serious flaws a few months ago, and I see no reason to trust it yet.

      Anyway, the installer still requires that you understand what's going on, so the manual is still useful.

      I've used gentoo on many systems, and have a ten system cluster running it. However that's a barebones gentoo setup. Home user gentoo is frustratingly hard for newbies.

      ps, IT WAS A JOKE!!!!!!111one lighten up n00b

    113. Re:Why bother? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe try using the free vmware server product and get unstuck?

      Yes, that might be the answer.

    114. Re:Why bother? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Why buy Doom4 if Doom1 runs fine?

      Why watch "The Two Towers" if "The Fellowship of the Ring" still plays on your DVD player? Why buy the new Harry Potter book if the last one is still readable?

      For single player computer games, there is limited replay value. Even Tetris gets boring after a while.

      Multiplayer games are somewhat different, but eventually games get old and it's more fun to do something new. Sure, there are still people playing Starcraft or Counter Strike 1.x, but not every game is that good and not everyone is interested in playing for 6 months just to get competitive.

      None of this makes it ethical to buy Windows Vista, but the "there's no reason to play new games because old games still exist" reasoning is absurd.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    115. Re:Why bother? by webheaded · · Score: 1

      Had it ever occurred to any of you that maybe some people actually LIKE Windows. I know it's crazy that someone could possibly not like Linux more, but you know...not everyone hates Windows as much as you do. For a majority of people, it gets the job done. I haven't had any REAL problems with Windows myself, honestly, since Windows 2000 came out. 2000 and XP are good systems. No, they are by no means perfect, but you know what? Neither is Linux. Yes, Windows has DRM but I'd rather just hack that than put together a workable Linux system to do what my Windows system does. Even then, I STILL can't play games.

      I get that Windows has problems, but it's nowhere near as bad as some of you drama queens make it out to be. Seriously, just give it a rest.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    116. Re:Why bother? by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I've needed a new sig for a while.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    117. Re:Why bother? by BiggyP · · Score: 1
      And i thought i might get away with making mildly disparaging comments about an Apple product without getting flamed, oh well :)

      But then you're swapping one expensive proprietary system [Vista] for a similarly expensive and more proprietary one [Mac OS X] It's well-known that Mac OS X is built atop, ships with, and heavily utilizes many open source projects (example, Mac OS Forge). OS X is just *brimming* with open source software. Most of the standards used directly utilize open source software behind the GUI and are based on open standards (some "de facto", most "de jure" (or whatever the technical analog is)).

      Vista Home Basic is $199. Tiger is $129. Vista Ultimate is $399. Tiger is $129. Mac OSX is built atop an opensource kernel but the components which actually make the thing OSX and not just Darwin are anything but open. Note that i used the word system here, not Operating System in particular, the combination of OSX and Apple hardware, with the safeguards they put in place to make that apple hardware a requirement, makes it just as much a proprietary system as windows. Similarly, we're talking about the overall cost of the system, not just the OS but the hardware too.

      Gaming on the Mac is in a slightly worse state, for commercial titles, than gaming on Linux from what i've seen. Absolutely false. There's a far greater number of games ported from Windows to OS X than to Linux. There are far more Mac-only commercial games than there are Linux-only commercial games. Then, of course, there's always Boot Camp (which *is* one aspect of "gaming on the Mac", less so as WINE and related projects mature on OS X).

      Additionally, OS X can play, essentially, all open source Linux games. I wasn't aware of all the ports to the mac, providing they're real ports and not winelib type ones that's rather good news, well it's nice to see regardless but a real port taking the time rewrite without DirectX is great to see.
      As for boot camp, that pirated or, rather expensive purely for games, legitimate, copy of windows is required here, Wine/Cedega and Open Source linux games, oddly enough they work on linux too...

      At least if you're pirating vista or installing Linux you don't need to switch to another provider's hardware. Although your implication is factually incorrect (if you want to include "piracy", you can pirate OS X and run it on a standard PC), your point is taken, and is the only one that's really all that accurate. Apple makes some really great hardware, and is priced very competitively compared with similar PC offerings. If that's a deal-breaker for you, then so be it. But for increasingly many people, this is being shown to not be much of a problem. Heh, the point is that buying an OS, even Vista, generally doesn't place arbitary restrictions on the type of hardware you use that OS with, beyond natural hardware incompatibilities, Apple have of course engineered such incompatibilities, along with licensing terms, to prevent non-Apple PC users from installing the thing, even if they pay for it. The reason OSX costs less than windows is that its subsidised by hardware sales, by tying the OS to the hardware they can give users that feeling of exclusivity they crave while selling them a product which basically equates to generic, commodity PC hardware in a stylish box.
    118. Re:Why bother? by 00lmz · · Score: 1

      My wife and I both use laptops which dual boot WindowsXP and Ubuntu. She has to run a windows application for her work and it doesn't work under wine so I got the free vmware player but got stuck because you need the commercial version to create a virtual disk.

      Last time I needed that, I used easyvmx.com. Very easy to use.

    119. Re:Why bother? by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      Bullshit! It has been a year since Gentoo binary installs. And what's that about running quicker? I am pretty sure it is quicker to install latest software on Gentoo (through compiling source) than finding googling for RPMs for a specific version of your system.

      It is easy to create and maintain ebuilds than RPMs (or .deb packages). (Yes the later means compiling, former does not.)
      It is easy to install/uninstall from bleeding edge (CVS/svn/darcs) repositories than ... i don't know how you do this in other distros.
      It is easy to get help. (Gentoo forums are the best out there. The community is the best. May be Ubuntu comes close to it. Not anything else.)
      I have been running Gentoo since 3 years and my desktop is the envy for my "Windowsy" friends, with e17, psi (with jingle) and what not installed. In Suse/Mandriva/Ubuntu it took more time to install these things and keep them up to date than Gentoo.

      Before you say "but people don't want to run latest", know that it does is a difference of opinions. Gentoo is for some people and other system is for other people. Your argument is pure and baseless BS. (It is funny that you were modded insightful. I also have mod points but I hope more people do some research about the topic before blurting out.)

    120. Re:Why bother? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      I think one reason no one wants to port to a Linux system and why they don't see a market in it is because THEY don't use a Linux system so why would anyone else?

      My whole game programming class (3rd university) is full of windows fanboys, if not most of the industry.

      This is going to be the next generation of game developers and they don't care about cross platform at all.

      Everyday I have to listen to BS marketing regurgitation about how amazing XNA and C# is that it lets you port your windows code to the xbox 360... wow... That vendor lockin code is... amazing...

      Another reason is because they think their code needs to be made open source to be available on a Linux system.

  3. Again I say! by arpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tag it: "defectivebyaccident"!

    1. Re:Again I say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no accident. They're desperate to get people using vista. "Pirate" or not "pirate". As long as it's their shit and not that eeevil *shudder* Leenux!

      I wonder what would it take for the masses to smell the rat and jump the boat. A nuke?

  4. How long before Microsoft patches Vista by lthown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, they do have this little windows update thing that sends out updates, I'm sure it's mostly trivial for them to fix the flaw

    1. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Doesn't it need to be activated to receive updates?

    2. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by jurgenaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you were sitting on an unactivated Vista, would you update this?

    3. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Tanuki64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, windows simply is not trustworthy. I mean automatic updates are something great, but a company, which uses such a system to further their own interests and not that of their customers is simply unacceptable. Ok, one can say that if I use a pirate copy I cannot complain, but even as a legit user I'd be bound to be a plaything of Microsoft's political interests. Best example is how fast they updated their DRM routines. I doubt that a user complained that he could do things with his windows, which he should not.

      Nope, the only way to use windows is in a virtual machine without network access.

    4. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously, they do have this little windows update thing that sends out updates, I'm sure it's mostly trivial for them to fix the flaw...

      It is not a flaw... it is a feature. Will corporates or home users willingly shell out big bucks for 8-times more hardware resources just to find the new OS cannot be pirated easily like the old one?

      Every OS from MS-DOS onwards has been piratable by design, for a reason.

      In DOS, you run format b:/s to get a pirated boot floppy with io.sys, msdos.sys and command.com.
      With Vista, you hack a few registry settings, and MS will pretend not to notice.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    5. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by kripkenstein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, windows simply is not trustworthy. I mean automatic updates are something great, but a company, which uses such a system to further their own interests and not that of their customers is simply unacceptable.

      100% agreement with you. Notice, though, how (at the end of TFA) Microsoft's position is that product activation is for the benefit of their customers. Something along the lines of "products hacked to avoid activation may be faulty" and such. So, a forced patch through Windows Update would be 'for the good of the customers', to save them from the perils of running WGA-less Windows. War is peace, and all that.

      One can only hope that in the long run such anti-consumer activity will come back to haunt them.
    6. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      8-times more hardware, eh? And where'd you pull that number? Out of your ass?

      Thought so.

    7. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      If you were Microsoft and cared about this, would you explicitly state that it was fixed by a given update?

      Personally I deplore anything that makes it less likely that any given user is going to keep their machine properly patched and up to date; each machine that's behind on its patches is another machine that's (even more) vulnerable to being zombified, and frankly, I get quite enough spam as it is.

    8. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by ady1 · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a forced patch with regards to windowsupdate.

    9. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, they'll patch Vista as soon as everyone moves to it ;)

    10. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I also agree and further want to comment how it makes me laugh really really loud when Microsoft PR troll's say that illegaly downloaded Windows programs are dangerous and that if you do not have geniune software it is unsecure and my ass.

      Software is software, wherever you get it you are getting the same POS if it has the same MD5 as their "original". And then, does it mean that if I make a Windows isntallation from an ORIGINAL disk but do not activate it or enter a "legal" serial number it means the software is dangerous? WTF then stop doing shitty dangerous software you assholes.

      Anyway, I have been using WindowsUE for some time after HP *refused* to sell me a "restoration" CD for my legally bought notebook in which I could use my legally obtained Windows Professional product key (which is on a sticker under my laptop) and after also being unable to use *that* legally obtained code with any other Windows Professional Installation... the only "solution" the HP representative told me was that (and I QOUTE) "The only way is to purchase a retail version.". Well Fuck You... I wont pay for Windows XP two times and I want to use the license for which I AM entitled

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    11. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      good lord how many times will the DRM argument be trotted out. I can tell you from hands on experience, nothing in Vista is preventing me from backing up my DVDs with DVD Decrypter or similar tools. Nothing is stopping me from ripping my CD's with winlame either. Even Windows Media Player gives you the option to disable DRM when you rip to WMA. so....... what exactly is the argument here? it seems to ME that it's "i bought this damn song and windows won't let me get around the DRM". what MS is doing is no different than any other company that produces and OS. Do you REALLY expect them to openly facilitate circumventing DRM? hello lawsuit... there are plenty of apps that run just fine in Vista that let you do this. it comes down to this: use/buy DRM'd media, play by their rules. don't blame the OS.

    12. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      True, but - if (for example) further security updates require this one, then it is essentially forced.

    13. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by kabocox · · Score: 1

      100% agreement with you. Notice, though, how (at the end of TFA) Microsoft's position is that product activation is for the benefit of their customers. Something along the lines of "products hacked to avoid activation may be faulty" and such. So, a forced patch through Windows Update would be 'for the good of the customers', to save them from the perils of running WGA-less Windows. War is peace, and all that.

      One can only hope that in the long run such anti-consumer activity will come back to haunt them.


      Um, from the MS P.O.V. those that haven't activated aren't consumers, they are pirates that didn't pay MS anything. Um, why shouldn't MS use their autoupdate service to lock out non-consumers that are using their product without paying? It could be much worse. MS could require their home version to have a verified name, home address and phone number and/or e-mail address before they'd even activate their product.

    14. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, a forced patch through Windows Update would be 'for the good of the customers', to save them from the perils of running WGA-less Windows. War is peace, and all that. One can only hope that in the long run such anti-consumer activity will come back to haunt them.

      You're not a customer if you haven't paid. WGA is a required portion of windows - that is, in my opinion, the only "wrong" part of this. Well, besides the fact that sometimes activation doesn't work, or that someone else can steal your key. Shutting down unpaid copies, though, is 100% legit.

      And really, requiring WGA is dirty on XP, because it wasn't part of the original deal, but it's 100% acceptable on Vista, where it's been since the beginning. You know up-front that Microsoft will require you to run some crap that provides no benefit to you, but you buy Vista anyway.

      Those who complain that they're locked into windows should take this time to reflect on their poor purchasing decisions in the past.

      If you get on the train, you'd better know where it's going, or have a say in where it's going. With Microsoft, neither is the case. Why would you even get on that train?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      True, some of the people who get around activation are pirates. But WGA also causes a lot of issues for paying customers. In particular, the basic fact is that Microsoft will probably patch these issues, and any patch carries a risk of causing things to break.

    16. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I mean automatic updates are something great, but a company, which uses such a system to further their own interests and not that of
      > their customers is simply unacceptable

      I bet you know people who have started to pay for their copies of Windows now, having used copies since 95 came out.

    17. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

      You lost.

    18. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by jkrise · · Score: 1

      8-times more hardware, eh? And where'd you pull that number? Out of your ass?

      Thought so.


      My ass doesn't run Vista yet, sorry.

      Any sysad will tell you XP needs 512MB RAM; and reports on Vista indicate the beast needs 4GB RAM to run as fast as XP. Any fool that doesn't have his head in his ass will tell you 4GB is 8 times 512MB.
      XP sweet spot is 512MB: http://www.practicalpc.co.uk/computing/windows/ram needs.htm
      Vista sweet spot is 4GB http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?com mand=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9011523

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    19. Re:How long before Microsoft patches Vista by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      Because an IBM consultant is really going to give a non-biased opinion on Vista? Right. Not to mention, that the same consultant you're referring to claims that XP's sweet spot is 2 gigs! So, according to the figures you pulled for Vista, and according to the figures from the same source about XP, Vista requires 2-times more hardware, not 8.

      So if any sysad will tell you that XP's sweet spot is 512 MB, yet this particular one claims its 2 gigs...yet you use his figure for Vista's requirement for 8? Besides, realistically, 1 gig is the sweet spot for XP if you're running more intensive applications.

      If you've used Vista, you'd know that it runs perfectly well with 1 gig of Ram. With 1 gig of ram, Vista runs just as well as XP with 1 gig. To really get a kick out of Vista, 2 gigs is great.

  5. Re:More DRM madness by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have no problem whatsoever with activation. If people do not want to pay MS prices then there are alternative OSes they can use. There is nothing at all wrong with a company trying to ensure that people actually *pay* for its products.

    This is the first time I've heard of Windows Activation being referred to as DRM. I think your knee just jerked, or perhaps you thought blasting DRM would garner you postitive moderation.

    What you *should* get is -1 (Offtopic)

  6. Can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    for some twit to tag this either 'haha' or 'defectivebydesign'

    1. Re:Can't wait by bl8n8r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      moderators: please tag parent haha

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    2. Re:Can't wait by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Your post has revealed the need for a "+1 Funnier".

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  7. Why Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, delaying activation is fine, but why would you want Vista in the first place? My laptop died recently and I bought a replacement Thinkpad. It came pre-loaded with Vista Business. I gave it a try for two weeks.

    - Despite having 1GB RAM, the laptop ran like a glued snail.
    - Network speed was inconsistent and seems to be bound to movements of the sun.
    - Many printers (including my HP 2600n) are still unsupported. Not sure if this is HP being their usual crap self or just a complete inability to get Vista to play properly with network printers.
    - Aero. Why?
    - So many features like "Map Network Drive" have now been moved so they can only be access from specfic areas like "My Computer"
    - The updated XP style for control panel etc is really frustrating.
    - When opening some MS Office 2007 applications, the screen would corrupt then everything would hang for about 3 minutes.
    - Maybe a problem with Vista's sound libraries? Music sounded tinny through Vista, but cleaner in XP on the same machine.

    Anyways, enough of that bollocks. I've wiped the whole disk and installed XP pro again.

    1. Re:Why Vista? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Hate to nit pick astronomically, but...

      Sun doesn't move much.

      It moves, but, not by much...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Why Vista? by n0rr1s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to nitpick too ;)
      But...

      How much the sun moves depends on your frame of reference. It's cruising round the galactic centre at a fair ol' rate, for example.

    3. Re:Why Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Many printers (including my HP 2600n) are still unsupported. Haha. You were suckered into the age-old "host based printer" scam. "Host based" printers don't internally support a standard printer language like PostScript or PCL. Instead, the printer only supports a proprietary protocol which requires a specialized, vendor-provided OS-specific driver. Only in a few cases have people been able to reverse-engineer a subset of these protocols.

      A major disadvantage to this for consumers that it allows manufacturers to "sunset" older printers.

      That's why I only buy standards-based printers - it allows me to decide when my printer is no longer viable. All of my printers are more than 10 years old, and I have no plans to retire any of them.

      Printer manufacturers don't provide host based printers in order to save inordinate amounts of money per unit - the chipsets required to support PCL and/or postscript are very inexpensive. This is all about vendor control.
    4. Re:Why Vista? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Sun Microsystems? Because I guess they don't move much... But as far as the sun as most people consider it (you know sol, that big ol' fusion bomb in the middle of the solar system?), it is moving a lot.
       
      Let's see, it orbits the center of the universe at oh about 220 km/s. Oh and the universe is expanding, and God only knows how fast that is going. So maybe relative to itself, the sun doesn't move much. But of course, you are a mere earthling and forget about the other 99.99999999999999999...% of the universe.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    5. Re:Why Vista? by Cythrawl · · Score: 1

      I hate to do this, so.... - Despite having 1GB RAM, the laptop ran like a glued snail. Maybe its just me but even Laptops that come from any Vendor preloaded with XP OR Vista run like a glued snail. They put so much crap on that even if you had the fastest hard drive and 4gb of Ram it would STILL run like a glued snail. Re-install the OS without the add-ed crap you dont need. You'd be suprised how much better it is. - Network speed was inconsistent and seems to be bound to movements of the sun. I havent had a single issue with networkspeed in Vista. Again its maybe because of the bloat. - Many printers (including my HP 2600n) are still unsupported. Not sure if this is HP being their usual crap self or just a complete inability to get Vista to play properly with network printers. This is HP, again... Look around you'll find they wont support most printers till "later this year" its not like Vista was in RC for like 12 months or anything... Im sure 12 months is MORE than enuff time to write drivers... - Aero. Why? Because it needs to look nice??.. It has to be at least competitve to OSX and some Linux Distros.. You arent froced to use it, you CAN turn it off you know... Totally invalid point.. - So many features like "Map Network Drive" have now been moved so they can only be access from specfic areas like "My Computer" But its still there??... So they cant change how an OS looks? so whats the point of releaseing a new OS that looks just like the last one.. Im sure you'd bitch about THAT too... - The updated XP style for control panel etc is really frustrating. Again you can turn it off and use the nice detailed view ... a pointless argument. - When opening some MS Office 2007 applications, the screen would corrupt then everything would hang for about 3 minutes. Obvioulsy a driver problem probably a BLOAT problem.. I would put a good bet on it that if you re-installed the OS and got the latest drivers again it would work fine. I have no such issues at all. - Maybe a problem with Vista's sound libraries? Music sounded tinny through Vista, but cleaner in XP on the same machine. Maybe its nothing to do with Vista and maybe you soundcard Vendor's Drivers are at fault???? Just a thought...

    6. Re:Why Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I've had a different experience with Vista

      -Ran fine with 1GB of RAM. Upgraded to 2GB of RAM after a few gaming websites said this was the new standard for gaming. Runs fine with 2GB of RAM too. Decided to try out Readyboost and added a 1GB Flashcard. It still runs fine. In fact its noticeably faster at loading applications than XP Pro.
      -Never had any network issues. The security of file and printer sharing is vastly improved over XP Pro. I was really impressed with this
      -My Cannon printer works. Did you check the HP website for drivers?
      -Aero sidebar is great. I like the new Windows calendar and the assorted widgets I've put on the bar remind of the good things about WindowMaker when I used it in college. Aero also looks great.
      -you get used to things being in different places.
      -You can revert to the old control panel style. I got used to the new one. You can also hit Start button and just type whatever you are looking for and Vista usually finds it. E.g. hit Start and then type "Computer Management". This is one of my favorite Vista features.
      -I haven't had any Office 2007 issues
      -I had some sound stuttering problems. Turns out this was related to my VIA RAID drivers being crap. I reverted to a version from 2005 and it fixed the problem
      -I lost some game performance. About 15%. Nvidia drivers are still crap and now my Videocard fan stays on all the time due to Aero. It's very noisy.
      -My screensaver won't come on and my PC won't hibernate no matter what I do

      All things considered I've been happy with my Vista experience on 1 year old hardware. Hopefully they fix the remaining bugs soon.

    7. Re:Why Vista? by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 1

      Same here, set up Vista Ultimate for a friend, and it was a horrible experience. The Control Panel is confusing and missing any kind of logic. They replaced My Documents and now you can't move it to D in a simple manner. The new icons for things like Windows Mail (formerly Outlook Express) are unclear. Typing in a country name in the Weather-widget expecting to see a list of locations within the country crashes Explorer completely. UAC is so invasive and annoying, I'm puzzled they actually dared to turn it on by default. First and last time I installed Vista, hopefully SP1 will be better.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    8. Re:Why Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite having 1GB RAM, the laptop ran like a glued snail.

      Nice. Glad I had put my coffee down.

    9. Re:Why Vista? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Oh and the universe is expanding, and God only knows how fast that is going.

      Don't they teach anything in schools anymore?...

      Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving
      And revolving at 900 miles an hour
      That's orbiting at 19 miles a second, so it's reckoned
      A sun that is the source of all our power
      The sun and you and me, and all the stars that we can see
      Are moving at a million miles a day
      In an outer spiral arm, at 40,000 miles an hour
      Of the galaxy we call the Milky Way

      Our galaxy itself contains 100 billion stars
      It's 100,000 light-years side-to-side
      It bulges in the middle, 16,000 light-years thick
      But out by us it's just 3000 light-years wide
      We're 30,000 light-years from galactic central point
      We go round every 200 million years
      And our galaxy is only one of millions of billions
      In this amazing and expanding universe

      The universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding
      In all of the directions it can whiz
      As fast as it can go, at the speed of light you know
      Twelve million miles a minute and that's the fastest speed there is
      So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure
      How amazingly unlikely is your birth
      And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space
      Because there's bugger all down here on Earth"

    10. Re:Why Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't really aimed at you, it's just what I thought of when reading your post. It made me think of previous submissions about Linux on desktop where people say it isn't ready yet...

      When a device doesn't work in a Microsoft product, it is always the manufacturer's fault for not providing the drivers. On the other hand, if a device doesn't work in a Linux environment, it is always "Linux sucks and should have all the drivers automatically!"

      "Re-install the OS without the add-ed crap you dont need." Normal people don't want to be bothered by re-installing the OS.

    11. Re:Why Vista? by Cythrawl · · Score: 2, Informative

      -The Control Panel is confusing and missing any kind of logic.

      Sheesh SET IT TO CLASSIC MODE... are people really that blind?

      -They replaced My Documents and now you can't move it to D in a simple manner.

      Acutally you can. Go into the user folder and right click on the folders in ther you can assign a new location for all the folder.. Much better than just dumping it all in one. For example, My Videos and point to one folder and My Documents to another. Why this is worse than before is beyond me, I think its much better and you have more control on where stuff lives.. Didnt look too hard did you?

      - UAC is so invasive and annoying, I'm puzzled they actually dared to turn it on by default.

      Its no more invasive than having to do root or SU login in Linux to do system tasks. Once you have the PC set up and all your major stuff installed you see less and less of UAC. Quit Whining... You asked for a more secure OS you got it..

      -Typing in a country name in the Weather-widget expecting to see a list of locations within the country crashes Explorer completely.

      parhaps its because theres something else wrong.. You dont get a list, you type your City and Zip code into the Gadget (Not Widget, unless you are trying to use Apple stuff on your Vista). and thats it... its done.. No list.. it doesnt use Explorer.. You did something wrong.. Infact thats a made up problem totally.

    12. Re:Why Vista? by archen · · Score: 1

      Sheesh SET IT TO CLASSIC MODE... are people really that blind?

      And every user is going to have it set to classic mode? I doubt it. I personally don't like going on a machine at a person's request to fix it and mess with all the settings. I would expect the new mode is what I will find, so I've tried (like many here) to use the new mode. I've stuck with the new start menu as well, and I've actually found it easier to use now.

      But the control panel is just a total quagmire. I honestly can't see Microsoft having done any usability studies on it. Despite being rather unfamiliar with a Mac, it's usually pretty easy to figure everything out. In windows when not in classic mode I can chase my tail endlessly trying to figure out things like where remote desktop would be enabled.

    13. Re:Why Vista? by Cythrawl · · Score: 1

      You can just set the controlpanel to classic mode so it shows all the control panel applets... not setting windows to classic mode, I think you misunderstood me I actullay like the new Areo interface and startmenu as well. I have a hard time going back to XP now

    14. Re:Why Vista? by pravuil · · Score: 1

      For all your answers to all the questions of the universe please refer to the Galaxy Song by Monty Python. ANFSCD . . .

    15. Re:Why Vista? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Thanks, you've totally made my Friday for me.

      I had totally forgotten how good a song this is and just stuck the MP3 on again to put a big smile on my face.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    16. Re:Why Vista? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Ok, to make Vista work ok...

      1- Set it to classic mode
      2- Go around and click on a bunch of folders to make them do what they used to do
      3- Spend a lot of time doing the equivalent of root so you don't see the UAC
      4- Blame him for something going wrong that you don't know about

      It seems like you do like Vista, but this guy seems like he doesn't want to have to screw around with stuff to make it work like XP, 2000, whatever. This sounds like an anti-Mac reply- people complain how a Mac has extra steps to make it work like they used, so it's too hard to try, but just do these extra steps with Vista and it's great.

      Just an interesting (to me) observation.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    17. Re:Why Vista? by buzzn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hm. The last "standards based" printer I bought, an Okidata with PS option, used SCSI as the interface. None of my PCs have SCSI, and it's cheaper and easier for me to buy a new printer than to install a SCSI card. So much for standard printer languages.

      --
      Join the window installer's union, where prosperity is a brick throw away!
    18. Re:Why Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Despite having 1GB RAM, the laptop ran like a glued snail.

      Is that your technical opinion?

                  - Network speed was inconsistent and seems to be bound to movements of the sun.

      Proof? Test? Works fine for me.

                  - Many printers (including my HP 2600n) are still unsupported. Not sure if this is HP being their usual crap self or just a complete inability to get Vista to play properly with network printers.

      I have a 2600n printer WORKING on Vista. If you took 2 minutes to read the driver site it would have said that the XP drivers work for now until they get a certified driver out.

                  - Aero. Why?

      Cause its way better?

                  - So many features like "Map Network Drive" have now been moved so they can only be access from specfic areas like "My Computer"

      Gee, I better switch back to XP cause they moved "Map Network Drive"

                  - The updated XP style for control panel etc is really frustrating.

      Can we say "Classic View"? Just like Classic View in XP?

                  - When opening some MS Office 2007 applications, the screen would corrupt then everything would hang for about 3 minutes

      I run Office 2003 with no problems. Video card?

                  - Maybe a problem with Vista's sound libraries? Music sounded tinny through Vista, but cleaner in XP on the same machine.

      Proof? My music sound exactly the same in Vista.

                  Anyways, enough of that bollocks. I've wiped the whole disk and installed XP pro again.

      Wow sounds like you wouldn't know good if it slapped you in the face!

    19. Re:Why Vista? by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1
      Seriously? Maybe I'll be modded down for this but I like Vista. But maybe its just that I'm using it as a NEW tool instead of trying to use it like XP.

      - Despite having 1GB RAM, the laptop ran like a glued snail.

      I'm using Vista Ultimate on my Macbook (black, 2Ghz Core2Duo, 1Gb Ram). While not totally approved from the Apple overlords, it runs great on the handy notebook. Snail it is not.

      - Network speed was inconsistent and seems to be bound to movements of the sun.

      My network speeds has been great. But yeah I'm still waiting for updated drivers. The speed is great but if I'm streaming mp3's I get pauses every few minutes. I'm patient though

      - Many printers (including my HP 2600n) are still unsupported. Not sure if this is HP being their usual crap self or just a complete inability to get Vista to play properly with network printers.

      My printer works. Meh YMMV

      - Aero. Why?

      Seriously? Aero is fantastic! It's not just about eye candy. If a program becomes unresponsive the program just blanks out letting you know that it can't be used right now. Much better than the blanking out that occurs with XP. Seeing window redraw is a thing of the past and responsiveness is very good.

      - So many features like "Map Network Drive" have now been moved so they can only be access from specfic areas like "My Computer"

      This one is just bullshit. Hit the ALT key. You get the menu you should be used to. Hit Alt+T and you get the tools menu. Map Network Drive is the first menu item.

      - The updated XP style for control panel etc is really frustrating. - When opening some MS Office 2007 applications, the screen would corrupt then everything would hang for about 3 minutes. - Maybe a problem with Vista's sound libraries? Music sounded tinny through Vista, but cleaner in XP on the same machine.

      I'll just handle all these together. Xp style for control panel is really user preference and can be changed. I don't use Office 2007(still using 2003) so I can't argue about it. And Vista sound libraries? The sound sounds fine to me, but I'm comparing OS X to Vista. ??? I dunno about that one???

      Although there a few things that I do like about Vista compared to XP I'll just enumerate just one. I really like that while in explorer I can be in any folder and go to the address bar and type /Videos to go to my home directory's video folder. Same thing with the other folders and this improves my life significantly.
    20. Re:Why Vista? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      in relative position to the rest of the galaxy vs our lifetimes, it's going to be where we found it when we die.

      Position of the sun is irrelevant to the operation of windows Vista.

      I'd say more the status of chickens is.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  8. So... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just change the system clock?

    1. Re:So... by taffeylewis · · Score: 1

      Because Vista sets the system clock from the Internet when you boot up. Besides, that's the oldest work-around in the book. Used to do that with evaluation software in the 80's.

      --
      I drink, therefor I am... drunk.
    2. Re:So... by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

      Because Vista sets the system clock from the Internet when you boot up.
      Really? This is interesting. What happens when you don't have internet access? Or if you pull the cable and connect later?
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista runs without keeping track of the time, in alternate dimension mode.

    4. Re:So... by Cythrawl · · Score: 1

      You didnt look very hard did you??? Autopatcher Vista.... http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/OS-Enhancement s/AutoPatcher-Vista.shtml

    5. Re:So... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 0

      Ragnarök

    6. Re:So... by taffeylewis · · Score: 1

      As far as I know (and don't quote me on this) Vista needs an Internet connection for activation. The last time I installed it there was no way to proceed without one unless you choose not to activate at that time. It then popped up with a message saying you would be asked to activate it in 30 days. Now, Microsoft may offer a way of doing it by mail but I'm not sure about that. I must admit, I was totally unimpressed by Vista. As far as I could tell it used fancy graphics to hide the fact that it's so locked down you can't do anything interesting with it. I'm sticking to Windows 2000 because I felt exactly the same way about XP when it came out. Still haven't found anything on XP that I can't do just as well as on W2K.

      --
      I drink, therefor I am... drunk.
    7. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My XP box will never need patching again!

      It's dual-boot (Mandriva). I've disabled networking on the Windows side. Linux is the BEST Windows patch! (That said, I still have to patch Linux ocassionally).

    8. Re:So... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing because they actually want their clock to show the right time. Crazy idea, I know.

    9. Re:So... by Maitri · · Score: 1

      I like having all my clocks set 5 minutes ahead - that would drive me crazy!

  9. Re:More DRM madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you not consider activation to be DRM? Activation prevents you from installing and using in a place without telecommunications, or where said communications are too expensive. It also has the small problem of how to activate when the company goes under (the company of course doesn't care about this aspect).

  10. Should be good enough for the home user by smchris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Win9X seems to have conditioned a lot of users to think that reinstalling every 6 months or so is normal anyway.

    1. Re:Should be good enough for the home user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame that nobody's used Win9x in something like 6 years, isn't it?

    2. Re:Should be good enough for the home user by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Being a certifiable software kleptomaniac, even my ubuntu system needs a good hose every once and a while.

      At the very most, say, once every six months :)

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:Should be good enough for the home user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame that you're so disconnected from reality.

      Windows 95 is mostly gone, but scads of people still use Windows 98.

  11. That is intentional. by nietsch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the one hand MS tries to make life hard for the small time infringers (most of them), but on the other hand they still need to be number one of most infringed software, so there needs to be a backdoor. They need to be the most infringed because the infringers are the easiest turned customers. If there were no ways to get around MS licencing tricks, there would be no more potential new customers when the next release of Windos arrives.
    My Father decided to buy a fresh Vista licence after using illegal versions before. That lasted about 3 days, then he decided to switch to linux (no, it had something to do with a 64bit intel compiler that was beer-free on linux only).

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:That is intentional. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      on the other hand they still need to be number one of most infringed software, so there needs to be a backdoor

      Yes you are right. Its always been that way. But I don't understand why they don't come up with a legitimate trial version. Download it for free. Run it for a week then activate it by credit card.

    2. Re:That is intentional. by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Partly, but mostly I think because they sell their OS to businesses, and if something business critical can't be run because of some silly activation problem there better be a work around.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  12. This isn't news by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are hacks out there to modify the countthe activation timer so that it never times out. The cracking group Parardox also supposedly released a crack that is suppose to emulate a bios to bypass the activation process all together.

    1. Re:This isn't news by Cythrawl · · Score: 1

      Actually if you can also mod your System BIOS so it looks like an OEM according to Vista (SLIC). Install Vista with OEM key (they are generic and some OEM's even use the same keys) Install the OEM's Digital Cert, Vista is instantly activated and will never expire...
      You can even get pre-modded BIOS's for most popular motherboards now so you dont have to do the hacking yourself.

      This has been around for like 4 weeks now...

      I'd give links, but Im sure its against the rules so I wont..

      If they blacklist the current OEM keys' then most of the PC's sold thru Dell, HP, Asus will also be blacklisted. Wont be good PR thats for sure... and even if they do its only a matter of using Keyfinder on the latest OEM install to get a new key.

      The Paradox one will probably be worked around as it modifies the (VISTALDR) Bootlader and it will only be a matter of time before M$ releases a patch to fix that.

      Ah well.. Vista's AntiPiracy lasted what... a month.....??

    2. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The paradox hack you mentioned was replaced in about 24 hours with a better version.
      The new version (search for Paradox.RAR (about 426KB) in the usual places...) doesn't modify/patch anything.
      It installs a Bios extension as a normal device-driver filter in Windows.
      When Vista queries the Bios to check for the bios-id strings the filter intercepts that and replies with a pre-defined bios-id matching a computer that is sold with pre-installed activation.
      You also need to import the matching machine-certificate for that particular computer.
      Vista compares the (fake) bios-id with the certificate: Finds a match and considers itself activated.

      Works like a charm. I was at a LAN party last weekend were about 25 PC's were installed with Vista Ultimate in this way.
      Not mine, I only touch M$ at the office, because I have to. I'm strictly Os-X and Linux at home.

      About the only thing M$ can do about it is produce a patch that tries to detect the presence of the device driver and stop it from working.
      I don't give them much chance. This sort of driver can very easily be made to change it's internal name, id's etcetera on every reboot.
      Hiding this stuff like a rootkit isn't too complicated either.
      If they try to "fix" it they probably get themselves tangled in a software arms-race against the crackers.

    3. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as someone whoes used the paradox crack (on this very machine no less) I have to say I have nothing but praise for their fine work. Why did I install vista you ask? Well when you go to fix the ceo's computer and cant even figure out the address bar in explorer, its time to learn some new skills.

      Yes I told him moving to vista was wrong. No ceos don't listen.

    4. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole thread made my day. Thanks

  13. Re:More DRM madness by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ---I have no problem whatsoever with activation. If people do not want to pay MS prices then there are alternative OSes they can use. There is nothing at all wrong with a company trying to ensure that people actually *pay* for its products.

    Registering a product (serial number or likewise) is one thing. Things can be made inconvienant for the casual copier. No technology will deter the big guys, not now, not ever. So, any sort of burden you set up will be absorbed by the honest guy. At worst, you'll alert the honest guy on how to use your programs the way the big pirates do.

    ---This is the first time I've heard of Windows Activation being referred to as DRM. I think your knee just jerked, or perhaps you thought blasting DRM would garner you positive moderation.

    Erm, it IS DRM. Or have you been living in a cave when MS brags how they can completely revoke drivers for the 64 bit vista, or how they can deny activation by their many means.

    When a computer gets "revoked" after I PAID my cold hard cash with, I WILL still have it work by hook or by crook. If you call or treat me like a thief, I will become one.

    ---What you *should* get is -1 (Offtopic)

    But you should get a -1 (Retarded, didnt think it through).

    --
  14. Missing tags... by djones101 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    defectivebydesign and haha. Quick, someone tag it!

    1. Re:Missing tags... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Nooooooo, just have the "defectivebyaccident", it is the first tag to make me laugh.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  15. Edit the SkipRearm Key by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft tells ya how to do it.

    How long before we see this as a Slashdot user name? "Hi, I'm Skip -- Skip Rearm."

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by SkipRearm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hi ! I'm Skip, Skip Rearm.

    2. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by Dekortage · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and the answer is: six minutes! :-)

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    3. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by jkrise · · Score: 2, Informative

      Brilliant work!

      The documentation, as usual does not give a clue as to the real intent of the registry setting.

      Interesting article here:
      http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/03/08/msdn_gloo m/

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by beset · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here...

      --
      1) Clever Sig 2) ????? 3) Profit!
    5. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by SkipRearm · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not new, I'm just reactivated every once in a while...

    6. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're lamer than you think.

    7. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <SkipRearm>0</SkipRearm>

      <ThrowChair>1</ThrowCh air>

    8. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by sheph · · Score: 1

      I don't think that does what you imply that it does (not surprising for a document from MS, but none-the-less) it looks like this is for creating an unattended install script.

      (oh, and ps the new captcha sux badly, I can't even read it)

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    9. Re:Edit the SkipRearm Key by Ster · · Score: 1

      So, six minutes then?

  16. Very Exciting, but already done by ehaggis · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Linux box runs for at least a year without activation also.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Very Exciting, but already done by daranz · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
    2. Re:Very Exciting, but already done by the_illuminatus · · Score: 1

      My Linux box runs for at least a year without xxxxxxxxx rebooting xxxx.

      There, fixed that mistake for you.

      --
      knee-jerk? check. post? check. okay, time to read the article.
  17. Why do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Paradox bios emulator allows you to get a genuine registered pc.

  18. Just extends the captive marketshare... by jkrise · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The lazy bums who will not learn Linux... the resellers in Asian markets who cannot upsell the new OS which requires 8 times more RAM just so the home user can surf the web... the so-called sysadmins in Corporate settings who will not learn ipconfig, iptables and basic Unix commands... and prefers to get one more worthless certification on Vista instead..

    The mindshare monopoly of the retarded lethargic users is critical to Microsoft.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "so-called sysadmins in Corporate settings who will not learn ipconfig, iptables and basic Unix commands"

      Why would they need basic unix commands and iptables under Vista? Or were you trying to say "ifconfig" there?

    2. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the so-called sysadmins in Corporate settings who will not learn ipconfig, iptables and basic Unix commands...

      Wow. You unix nerds still haven't gotten over your bizarre fetish with obscure commands in a console? It's 2007 for crying out loud. Move out of your parents' basement!

    3. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

      the so-called sysadmins in Corporate settings who will not learn ipconfig, iptables and basic Unix commands..

      $ ipconfig
      bash: ipconfig: command not found

      $ echo "alias ipconfig=ifconfig" >> ~/.bashrc

      It's never ceased to amaze me the sheer number of workarounds one collects when using or administering Windows systems. To say nothing of endless variations of regkeys and values that must be memorised, but change frequently enough to remind you that the sum total of your knowledge is mostly a collection of useless trivia.

    4. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      The lazy bums who will not learn Linux... the resellers in Asian markets who cannot upsell the new OS which requires 8 times more RAM just so the home user can surf the web... the so-called sysadmins in Corporate settings who will not learn ipconfig, iptables and basic Unix commands... and prefers to get one more worthless certification on Vista instead.. The mindshare monopoly of the retarded lethargic users is critical to Microsoft.

      Yeah, shame on us for wanting to use a computer to actually be productive!

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    5. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by adnonRT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sysadmins are creatures that follow the money trail friend. If the company wants a Win based platform as their workhorse, then the sysadmins are getting certs on that platform. Why on earth would you go through the trouble of learning Linux if what you need is a cert on Win2003 server administration? That sounds like you are setting yourself up for either getting fired for being a complete chuckle head who doesn't know his company's O/S of choice well enough to be able to audit logs or getting passed over on a potential raise or promotion because you couldn't take the time to learn the GD O/S that your company uses and HIRED you to learn and administer for them. Knowing linux commands is definitely a good thing to know, however, for a Windows sysadmin, it is NOT mission critical.

      Right now, getting certs on anything non windows related if you are a sysadmin at a company that uses windows is a hobby. Until you get paid for what you know, it is just a hobby. Me? I hate windows and Vista especially. BUT I get paid to administer it so I do what needs to be done to do that well. That includes renewing certs, researching the myriad exploits that are out there everyday, and dealing with crap ware from Redmond. My linux know how is, for the moment, just for my home use and pleasure. Maybe one day I will run into a company or organization that uses a unix based system instead of a doze based system.

      EDIT: What I have tried in the past is to approach my CIO with the idea that we could use linux for certain things or resources and each time he doesn't want to hear it. So this forces me to learn what they want me to learn. BECAUSE of that, Linux is just a hobby....for now.

    6. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      Oh you mean the Linux that runs every windows app seamlessly ('just by using wine'). The one where running up to date drivers, seeing flash or running java applets is just a matter of downloading and manually installing binaries that were compiled especially for your distro, because having it there out of the box was a violation of the integrator's highly moral standards ?

      Yeah, what a bunch of bums.

    7. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Delight-Delirium · · Score: 1

      Just FYI retarded and lethargic are not one and the same.

      I'm definitely not retarded. I've learned linux. But I'm too fucking lazy to use it. Besides, I need windows to play WoW and I can't afford the powerbook I keep dreaming about. So. There you go. Another lethargic windows user.

      Oh, and in another life I was a sysadmin. I don't understand what kind of sysadmin rely on certifications and do not resort to non-gui commands. Probably retarded ones.

    8. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by adnonRT · · Score: 1

      Must have been another life, in a galaxy far far away. 5 to 7 years ago I would have said 'Yep you are right' However today, so many of the things I do require little non-gui interaction to happen. I still have some non-gui things that need to get done, but very VERY few compared to 6 years ago. (In tech time 6 years = 6 million years? Sure feels that way.) If I want to really geek out then yeah I can go do some stuff old school. The only time I really have to go to a command line these days is whenever I putz around in my cisco switches. Or whenever I want to run a talker/listener list from my gateway to spy on my user's activities. Even that though is going to be GUI replaced soon though. We recently found a really neat GUI based software that lets us do that. Complete with green light and red light icons!!!

    9. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

      Microsoft does what my business needs. And as long as it does what we need I will do my best to make sure Linux or any Open sores software never makes it inside the doors.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    10. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Nope. Try again.

      Because as a successful business person, you're keen to identify any areas where you might possibly make cost-savings for infrastructure, and maybe have a little more security at the same time to boot. This is why you would be keen to evaluate Linux in an objective fashion.

      Therefore, the correct answer would have been to say that you've evaluated one or two Linux servers and not found them to be appropriate to your business needs for [insert reasons here].

      But instead you resort to childish "Open sores" type comments which serve no other purpose than to categorise you as a troll.

      And just to clarify one final point since you've obviously never done any real research into "Open Source" itself - whilst many Linux distros can be entirely made up of Open Source software, the two terms are not interchangeable as there is a lot of Open Source software for Windows also - e.g. OpenOffice, Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird, GIMP, etc.

      So I suggest you need to check your PCs over in case - as there might be Open Source software dirtying your proprietary software environment already...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    11. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Delight-Delirium · · Score: 1

      Wow... I feel so ... irrelevant. You pegged it dead on, I left IT about 6 years ago...

    12. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Yep, that's right.

      And when, on Windows, you can combine console commands in a script file that, for example, looks for illegal access attempts on your Internet connection and, when they happen, not only emails you to tell you they are happening but also reconfigures your firewall to block those IP addresses for an hour, works out the DNS domain from the IP address and then automatically emails a complaint to "abuse@" that domain reporting the problem, then give me a shout.

      Unless you have any concepts of text manipulation, regular expressions and scripting, then please do not try to even begin to understand the power of the UNIX command line.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    13. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Delight-Delirium · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, let me lag even worse than I do now, please! I'm gonna have to go with a big fat no on that one. My warcrack addiction is too great to take such risks.

    14. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Look. You can whine or insult the Windows user base as much as you want, but you can't escape the fact that hardly anyone cares what goes on their computer. It'd be like me whining to you that people don't care about Ultimate Frisbee and how their lives would be enriched by it. How they are lazy for not bothering to explore other forms of entertainment and that if they would, they would discover a sport that can make dreams come true.

      In three words: get over it.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    15. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And when, on Windows, you can combine console commands in a script file that, for example, looks for illegal access attempts on your Internet connection and, when they happen, not only emails you to tell you they are happening but also reconfigures your firewall to block those IP addresses for an hour, works out the DNS domain from the IP address and then automatically emails a complaint to "abuse@" that domain reporting the problem, then give me a shout.

      Is it cheating to use cygwin? :)

      Actually, you could probably accomplish much of that using WSH, with which you could use any WSH-enabled language. You can certainly accomplish it with perl. Read up on the netsh firewall functionality...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat you are most of the time. Most of the companies I contract for are running Windows exclusively, with a few companies having one or two Linux boxes. I don't run Windows on my personal hardware, but when it comes to paying the bills, I better damn well know it.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    17. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Spudds · · Score: 1
      Now that just scares me.

      That's the problem with our industry. There's to many people going "Where's the money?" and not enough people that truly love technology.

      A company has no "OS of choice", the choice is dictated by the knowledgable staff of the IT department. If that's not true where you work then your company has serious issues.

      If you personally (anyone reading this) base your career decisions specifically on "where's the money" or any phrase of similar meaning, please please do the rest of us in IT that actually care about our jobs/technologies/the future of techonoly a huge favor and pick a different career path. Marketing may be a good choice for people like you, or perhaps the stock market.

      Side Note:

      Me? I hate windows and Vista especially. BUT I get paid to administer it so I do what needs to be done to do that well.

      Doing something you hate for money, at least where I come from, is called being a sellout. Find a linux company if you hate windows. I personally would travel to the ends of the earth to avoid being a "windows administrator" for more reasons than I can list here.
    18. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may come as a shocker to you, but...
        - Linux is not the silver bullet.
        - Linux is not everyone's answer to everything.
        - Linux does not do everything windows (or mac os, or [insert os here] can do only better.
        - Using Linux does not make you better than someone who doesn't. It does not make you enlightened, and does not give you a carte-blanche for acting like a pompous douchetard.

      Just as an FWI, I used Linux (Mandrake, Slack, Debian, Gentoo, and Ubuntu) for a period of roughly 9 years, before moving onto FreeBSD. Before that I'd use IRIX. I still use Solaris (on SPARC boxen) and FreeBSD (on everything else) on the server end.

      But my desktop runs Windows, simply because Linux doesn't offer me applications that do what I need to do, in a means that is adequate to my needs. My needs being a means to produce multimedia in a manner which is comfortable,m enjoyable and productive, for me. Multimedia has never been Linux's strong point. Specialty multimedia hardware support is just about as bad, if not worse than the software end of it.

      It might also come as a shocker to you that the whole Aero argument is completely asinine. Windows has just as many alternatives to the explorer shell, as linux has DEs or WMs. Some of which are extremely lightweight and functional. (Litestep, blackbox, geoshell, aston, darkstep, windowmaker, GNUstep, etc). So that whole "8 times more RAM to get online lol" argument, is, frankly, just as stupid as sayig "Linux sucks because KDE is a memory hog", or "Linux sucks because Windowmaker is ugly".

      Linux isn't the best tool for every job, and it isn't the answer for everyone. No amount of perching on your high horse and spewing pretentious douchetardery will change that. It will, however help with keeping people away from Linux.

    19. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

      The problem is Linux wouldn't serve my needs. I need an Operating system that works and doesn't require someone to reprogram it every time something doesn't work. Also I am not training users on how to use an operating system they have never even heard of. Linux is not made for everyone. It is a home user operating system for someone that likes to program and has no place being in a corporate environment. We need something that works and something that others support.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    20. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      You seem to only be able to talk in generalisations - which suggests to me that you know a lot less about Linux than you think you do.

      What do you mean by "reprogram"? Correct me if I'm wrong but if something doesn't work in Windows, you *reconfigure* it, or maybe download some kind of update. With the exception of not always having a GUI in Linux to carry out that change or update in, the procedure is no different on Linux. On rare occasions, you may need to "recompile" the kernel to get a piece of hardware - but do some research on the hardware before you buy it and use a modular kernel with the right distro and you can usually avoid that level of work.

      Also your training comment is stupid. Surely the whole purpose of training someone is to expose them to something new?

      And perhaps you'd like to explain why a "home user operating system" is currently being used in more embedded devices than you could possibly know about, as well as ISPs and data centres across the entire globe. Oh, and why, for the large telecomms company I work for, Linux is the core underlying OS for our telephony servers that can each drive around 30,000 extension and trunk ports in busineses and telephony service providers everywhere.

      I am not, in any way, disagreeing with your comments that Linux may be unsuitable for some of the things you need to do in your business. But I do suggest that you have had little or no exposure to Linux and are therefore basing your comments on hearsay and a complete lack of actual knowledge of Linux. Therefore you are not qualified to make those comments.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    21. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Peyre · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! That's retarded. Are you still in school, by any chance?

      The choice of software is dictated by the IT staff to mid/upper management? I can tell you two things from personal experience: that's not how it works in the corporate world, and it's not how it works in (CA) state government. The IT staff is relied on to make informed recommendations, but management decides what's best for its bottom line--Total Cost of Ownership and all that. They generally go with proprietary solutions because they'd rather pay for support they know will be there than take a chance on something free/inexpensive that might leave them high and dry at a critical moment. And most end users are familiar with Windows, which means there's an extra (training) cost associated with *nix.

      Also, by "follow the money", people here are talking about keeping their jobs. Not everyone can get a job that uses their OS of choice. And if they don't like the OS they have to support, that doesn't necessarily mean they hate their job--chances are they enjoy it but have to put up with a particular annoyance. That's life. It's also professionalism.

    22. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

      Your right I don't know much about Linux. To be honest I really don't care to know anything about it. My network works perfectly without it so there is no need to move to it. We don't need to make useless changes to an OS that is hardly supported.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    23. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The mindshare monopoly of the retarded lethargic users is critical to Microsoft."

      Those users are a reality, and that market is a large and profitable one.
      Linux users decrying the Luser market instead of catering to it, cede that important market to Microsoft.
      The members of that market make decisions that affect the rest of us.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    24. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      We don't need to make useless changes to an OS that is hardly supported.

      Can you please define "useless change"? That sounds like something of an oxymoron (like "Microsoft Works" for example) - surely if there was no point making a change, then why would you make it?

      I'd also ask for an explanation of "hardly supported". You can buy *technical* support from Red Hat, Novell, IBM, to name but a few. And whilst I agree Linux support people are a smaller number than those offering Windows support, there are still an ever-growing number of people capable of offering it. Not to mention the number of free forums on the Internet where you can get support.

      You run your business how you see fit, and if Microsoft products work for you then keep using them. But please desist from these baseless opinions about Linux - you, by your own admission, are *not qualified* to make those statements - so please do not make them.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    25. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amazing how the use of the work "boxen" in a post will make it sound too stupid to be taken seriously.

    26. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most company execs don't like prison for violating corporate regs like SOX, so they buy what is certified secure, for CYA reasons.

      Thus, Windows will be here to stay at my work. Apple, on their website about common critera and FIPS compliance, keeps promising compliance, never delivering.

      So, its Windows where I work for the long haul, like it or not.

    27. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

      Well this is simple

      Useless change: Everything is working. People who use the "Microsoft Works" and claim that it doesn't just don't know what the hell their doing.
      I'm sick of people chanting that Microsoft products crash or are unstable or this or that. It's stupid. I have had no problems from any of my servers that were not caused by user error. So to sum that up, it would be a useless change.

      Now as for support that to is easy and I will just sum this one up. There are plenty of 3rd party vendors that do not support Linux.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    28. Re:Just extends the captive marketshare... by L0rdJedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      C:\WINXP>ifconfig
      'ifconfig' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
      operable program or batch file.

      C:\WINXP>doskey ifconfig=ipconfig

      It's never ceased to amaze me the sheer number of workarounds one collects when using or administering Linux systems. To say nothing of the endless variations of config files and values that must be memorised, but change frequently enough (or are different between distros) to remind you that the sum total of your knowledge is mostly a collection of useless trivia.

      Yes, that can be made to always run (from the registry), just like yours will run from .bashrc.

  19. Hmmm by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    > With more research, said Livingston, it may even be possible to find a way to postpone activation indefinitely.

    I wonder what will be pushed out in tomorrow morning's Auto-Update?

  20. Re:More DRM madness by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is the first time I've heard of Windows Activation being referred to as DRM.

    Digital? Check. Rights? Check. Management? Sure looks like it to me.

  21. given last weeks article... by pjr.cc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given last weeks article about how ms want people to pirate their products and that they do it so that people would eventually turn to the "legal" route, does anyone believe this was found by "accident"?

    seriously, hasn't this always been the way? give people a way to run MS's products pirated? maybe im just an old cynic..

  22. Re:More DRM madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can activate by mail. Besides, so few people purchase computers in places where telecommunications are severely limited that the point's moot. As for Microsoft going under... I don't think we'll ever see that in our lifetime.

  23. Re:More DRM madness by Marcus+K · · Score: 0

    Because DRM is technologies that is used to control the usage of a product. If Microsoft added the restriction that more than one person might not use their operating system simultaneously and a system to control that, it would be considered as DRM.

  24. Security Update for Windows Vista (KB666666) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Download size: 773 KB , less than 1 minute
    A security issue has been identified that could allow you to compromise your Windows-based system using regedit and gain control of your licensing destiny. You can help protect our destiny by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you wil be required to restart your computer.

    1. Re:Security Update for Windows Vista (KB666666) by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Here, just made some corrections:

      "Download size: 773 KB , less than 1 minute
      A security issue has been identified that could allow you to compromise your Windows-based system using regedit and gain control of your licensing destiny. You can help protect our destiny by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you will be required to restart our computer."

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  25. Re:More DRM madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No technology will deter the big guys, not now, not ever.

    Simply because a copy-protection system can be cracked doesn't mean that it won't deter piracy. Although a fence around my yard won't prevent someone determined from entering, it will keep most people out.

    So, any sort of burden you set up will be absorbed by the honest guy.

    If activation is handled properly (which Microsoft doesn't do) it provides no burden whatsoever. For example, the racing simulator Live For Speed uses an easy, painless activation scheme to deter piracy. Activation need not be a burden.

    When a computer gets "revoked" after I PAID my cold hard cash with...

    I wonder how often that happens to legitimate copies? Unless Microsoft isn't careful with its database of activated clients, I'm not sure how this could potentially occur.

  26. Riddle me this. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Who's the real retard? The folks who pirate Vista or the geeks who can't understand why someone would want to pirate Windows over the oh so easy to use Linux?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Riddle me this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's the real retard? The folks who pirate Vista or the geeks who can't understand why someone would want to pirate Windows over the oh so easy to use Linux?

      Neither. Those who pirate Vista are to be pitied, not abused by being labelled retards.
      Geeks never understand anything except technology.... hell they don't even know how to get laid... no point calling them retards.

      Retards would be those who shill for MS on Slashdot, instead of spending their lifetime on more fruitful pursuits. Like you, perhaps?

    2. Re:Riddle me this. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Still you!

      Nah, just kidding, it was that linux geek.

      Firstly, a lot of people have never even heard of Linux, how would they? Does redhat take out huge billboards all over the world...NO. Most people are to inept to use a computer in the first place, never mind start fooling around with OS.

    3. Re:Riddle me this. by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Geeks never understand anything except technology.... hell they don't even know how to get laid... no point calling them retards.

      Ahem!

      May I present myself as a geek - a 45 year old Star Trek nut who asked for, and got given, a remote controlled dalek for his last birthday. I also read sci-fi, play Doom and Quake a lot, work in a UNIX/Linux security role and was programming RSX-11 on DEC PDP-11s in my 20s.

      Oh, and I'm sure my wife of some 15 years will also find your comments amusing.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  27. OK, so where IS the skiprearm usage count stored? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody know? One of the sysinternals utils to watch registry modifications during
    use ought to pint it up...

  28. That's all well and good... by physicsboy500 · · Score: 1

    But you're still stuck running vista.

    --
    The original generic sig.
  29. Brilliant! by aapold · · Score: 1

    now is we can just keep this under wraps, we can....
    ..
    .. (looks around)

    DOH!

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  30. MS certs and career advancment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, the fact is, like many other sys admins, I work in Windows because it pays the bills, sure *NIX admining pays more, but there are few jobs and many university types gobbling them up as fast as they appear here in the midwest. also, my emplyer pays for MS training and certs, so I would be foolish not to get them as they mean the potential for greater money when my evaluation comes up...I like and use Mac OSX and Linux, but hey, MS pays the bills at this point, that is just how it is..

  31. Off topic? by supachupa · · Score: 0

    This may be off topic, but I think that this is the perfect time to switch to a new operating system. The menus and interfaces are so different in Vista/O2K7 that we all need to relearn how to use them anyway. This time could be spent with new users on Linux(or OS X)/OpenOffice.

    1. Re:Off topic? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      So different? In the sense that people can't trivially figure it out?

      1. Click on foot
      2. Go to Internet option
      3. Click on firefox.

      OMG THAT's HARDZOR!

      At the point that you can't just browse a menu for 5 seconds and find what you want, chances are you shouldn't be using a computer. What happens when you encounter a road you haven't driven on before? Or an airport you haven't been to before? Do you shutdown and cry?

      My god people...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Off topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing either

      1. You never ever upgraded a Microsoft product or
      2. You never used anything BUT Microsoft products.

      I have never seen a Microsoft "upgrade" that didn't change everything around. Take IE (please!). One version had "options" under "file", andother had it under "Edit", another had it under another menu item it doesn't have any more (don't remember what they called it), another had it under "tools". Great productivity enhanser!

      The biggest difference betweeen (say) one company's word processor and another company's is where in the menus the commands are located.

      I found "upgrading" to XP from 98 required a LOT more relearning than upgrading from XP to Mandriva. The GP is entirely correct, as anyone who has ever gone from one version of any Microsoft product to another AND gone from a Microsoft product to anyone else's knows.

      Obviously you aren't in this group.

      BTW...

      1. Click on foot

      Huh? What foot? XP has no feet! You completely made the GP's point for him.

    3. Re:Off topic? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So different? In the sense that people can't trivially figure it out?

      Some people are so caught up in the idea that it's all zeroes and ones that they simply cannot grasp the logical concepts above them. They are able to drive a car without understanding the laws of physics, but they can't manage to understand the ideas of dialog boxes and menus.

      These are the people that have to write down every mouse click in a process. And then when an unexpected error pops up it throws them off completely and they have to start over. Recurring error? They're calling you on the phone telling you they don't understand. Never mind that 99% of the time the error tells you what is happening in plain english.

      The difference between a geek (or nerd or what have you) and a living suicide member of the masses is that when they encounter something they don't understand, their first reaction is fear, whereas when we encounter something new, our first reaction is that we want to take it apart and see how it works.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Off topic? by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      I found "upgrading" to XP from 98

      Yeah, "upgrading". We'd better be sarcastic here, because 98 was just TOTALLY stable, fast, and was just FAR more usable than XP. Oh wait.

      Huh? What foot? XP has no feet!

      He was talking about Gnome, I think saying that the GGP wouldn't even need to use "the time spent teaching Vista/Office07" to teach Gnome, since it's easy.

      One version had "options" under "file", andother had it under "Edit"...

      What, are you telling me that every version of KDE from 1.0 to 3.5 and Gnome from 1.0 to 2.18 have had every single option in the exact same place? Or Konqueror, Nautilus, Firefox, and Opera for that matter? Of course IE sucks, but come up with something better than "they changed where a menu option is".

      If you constantly bitch about how (for example) XP sucks, how the hell would Microsoft ever improve it without changing something? Yes, they've changed things around in Vista. But guess what? It's more intuitively organized and if you have half a brain and actually read what's on the screen, it's not hard to find anything at all! Or god forbid, use the new search feature, which actually rocks (not that anyone on Slashdot would know, because they don't use something before bashing it).

      Borrow some poor soul's DVD who actually paid for it, and use it free for 4 (or now 12 I suppose) months. Then sarcastically bash it, and you might have a good argument based on reality.

      And before flaming me as a Microsoft fanboy (because obviously I am if I have anything positive to say about them) realize that I use Slackware as much as I use XP (and I don't use Vista because game performance isn't yet up to par with XP, and that's ATI and Nvidia's problem.)
      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    5. Re:Off topic? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      This day and age, people are used to navigating thu websites that have very different UIs among them, and there's no issue. Vista having a different UI than XP will NOT drive anyone to Linux. Other things might, but not UI. Same for Ok27 vis-a-vi OO.o.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  32. Re:Why even bother? by kestasjk · · Score: 2

    Sometimes I wonder if these people aren't affiliated with Apple..

    These Apple posts always read like an Apple "Hot news" testimonial;
    "I'm a long time big business guy who researches cancer, is a long time software engineer, or applies computers to art, who has high standards and has tried everything.
    What do I use you [don't] ask? Apple OS X; it's stunning, and the user-experience is breathtaking, it truly is the center of my digi-life. And, for a limited time only, it starts at only $399.

    Your life. Your potential. Your Macintosh.
    Think different."

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  33. Just don't bother... by Joce640k · · Score: 0

    Can anybody come up with a single good reason to install Vista?

    All I see on the 'net are tales of woe from people who were unfortunate enough to install it.

    Even the NBMers are complaining this time.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Just don't bother... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 0

      Likely, because you show up to work one day and there it is. Persuant to Microsoft's liscencing agreement, any company or OEM that refuses to stop terrorism by keeping the intratubes safe through upgrading is guilty of a B felony.

    2. Re:Just don't bother... by jslater25 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I find to be horribly ironic is that Vista is everything that many users ASKED for. They wanted shiny graphics. They wanted a calendar on the desktop; they wanted to see search capability on the Start menu. IE7 was something IE users requested. Task switching (displaying folders like a Rolodex). My Computer is now simply named Computer to help lessen the confusion. Something called a Breadcrumb Bar. The list goes on.

      Now, before everyone starts bashing me, please note I did not say ALL users asked for this. Nor did I say ANY /. users wanted any part of this. In fact, any techno-literate person would prefer not to have the added processes that Vista has running all the time. Personally, I don't see much point in going to Vista because I don't want a calendar on the desktop, I don't want to sacrifice my collection of games for the few that MS has added only for Vista. I prefer few processes running in the background to optimize my system for what I want running, not what MS believes I should have running.

      Unfortunately for those in an office setting, many will be forced to go to Vista when OEM dealers stop offering XP as an option. I know my office will be looking at Vista within a year because we are too lazy to buy XP licenses and reinstall Windows XP after wiping the HDD of Vista.

    3. Re:Just don't bother... by Micklewhite · · Score: 0

      The thing about the sort of people who actually go out and install windows vista is that they're morons. I mean people like us; we're clearly smarter than them because we haven't installed it yet. That being said, I reckon since people like you and me are so smart we'd probably be able to install Vista and have absolutely no troubles whatsoever.

      So install it, and everybody will comment on how smart you are.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Thumbs_up.jpg

      --
      I don't own a snook, and if I did I wouldn't leave it cocked.
    4. Re:Just don't bother... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, We had the foresight to buy a corporate licensed copy of XP early last year.

      We have a Dell Premiere Account, and just order all Dell N-Series Desktops and Laptops with the resource CD included. Then we either install XP, or ghost an image onto them. We won't be going to Vista until we have no choice (IE: MS drops support for it) and even then we will be using the "Business" version with all the crufty pretties turned off via Active Directory. So basically XP-v2 without the legoland desktop theme.

      I would LOVE to be able to go to a Red Hat or Ubuntu desktop setup, but since my work designs Windows-based software with windows-based tools, it's not really an option. (more's the pity)

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    5. Re:Just don't bother... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Ok... so what were they doing the other 4 years of development when they weren't making the GUI all shiny and the start menu unusable?

    6. Re:Just don't bother... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Good question. ;)

    7. Re:Just don't bother... by Poruchik · · Score: 1

      The other 4 years their VSS servers were synchronizing themselves.

      --
      $signature =~ s/$signature//;
    8. Re:Just don't bother... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Microsoft had rented their programmers to 3DRealms to work on duke Nukem Forever during that time.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    9. Re:Just don't bother... by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      "Unfortunately for those in an office setting, many will be forced to go to Vista when OEM dealers stop offering XP as an option. I know my office will be looking at Vista within a year because we are too lazy to buy XP licenses and reinstall Windows XP after wiping the HDD of Vista."

      I'm pretty sure "those in an office setting" will have no problem finding OEM dealers offering XP until January 29, 2009, XP's end date on Microsoft's "System Builder License Availability" roadmap.

      Sure, home models (e.g. Dell Dimension, HP Pavilion) are already phasing out XP as an option. However, the real business models (Dell Optiplex, HP Compaq 5000 Series) make a point out of maintaining long product lifecycles, which I assume includes Windows XP support (mainstream support ends 4/4/09, extended support ends 4/8/14).

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  34. Round and Round and Round It Goes... by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It doesn't stop pirates.

    But it does deny access to paying customers... some of Microsoft's biggest and best customers.

    So Microsoft needs to put in a backdoor so that their support professionals can take care of those customers over the phone.

    But if you're telling hundreds of people about a backdoor, sooner or later it will leak.

    So Microsoft will need to patch the backdoor.

    But if they do that, once again, they'll be screwing their best customers.

    So they'll need to open another backdoor. Quite possibly the new backdoor will be opened by the very same patch that closes the SkipRearm backdoor.

    Microsoft doesn't benefit from this. Microsoft's customers don't benefit from it. The only people who benefit from it is the computer trade press and Slashdot, which is assured of an endless stream of news stories to talk about.

    1. Re:Round and Round and Round It Goes... by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I'm not so sure.

      I have a number of friends that had no problem pirating the likes of Win XP and Office when all you had to do was type in the key you get off of the CD that someone burned for you or the net. But after WGA, a number of them when out and bought XP and Vista because they did want to deal with all of that 'registry stuff'.

      As for myself and most people here, that 'registry stuff' is not going to bother us, but as much as we don't want to admit it, it does keep may of the masses honest.

  35. Hello, skip! by ari+wins · · Score: 1

    Apparently, about 6 minutes.

    --
    Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
  36. So... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    While I agree this is slightly interesting, it's not terribly useful, since it's likely that a mandatory auto-update will plug this hole soon. And without updates, the first of the many-to-be-found-exploits in all the new Vista code, will leave you vulnerable. It's rather ironic (and convenient for MS) that Windows' shoddy security, and the associate desperate need for updates, gives them a lot of control of forcing updates on you to plug activation and genuine advantage holes and such.

    Thankfully for XP (which is where I level off anyway, why bother with Vista), there's Autopatcher and similar sites, which allow a *far* more convenient way of getting and applying patches than MS update. Don't know if there is anything similar for Vista, or if it's possible or will be permitted to continue by MS.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  37. Re:More DRM madness by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

    As for Microsoft going under... I don't think we'll ever see that in our lifetime.
    God that's a stupid statement. If you know anything about business, you know that situations can change rapidly - anyone who had shares in anything remotely related to the 2001 accounting scandal will tell you that.

    It's not impossible that the tech industry could change in a way where MS were entirely unable to compete. This is the tech industry, remember.
  38. HP 2600n is a new breed... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    of disposable printers. You see, the color laser mfrs have gotten too greedy in the oem toner game, and too loose with the baseic hardware. It is cheaper to go buy a new 2600n (or the current flavor of the month) than it is to replace the toners. Also, as the printer ages, the quality goes downhill quickly - a brand new 2600n looks great, but with one set of toners through it will look pretty poor. Why drop $400 on a new set of toners when you can get a whole new system and engine for $300 or less?

    FWIW, I have a 2600n on my desk, and a (10? 15?) year old HP5siMX that we use as the workhorse printer. Oh, and a Dell 5100n - which produces pretty poor output, but is good enough for color reports and is cheap for black prints. Once the color runs out, it's disposable, too ($575 for a new set of toners in a printer I paid $580 for is disposable in my book - luckily the black toner is $50/9000pgs, and the original color toners are good for 8000ea).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:HP 2600n is a new breed... by pikine · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here are the prices I got today from HP's website. After you subtract the unit price by the cost of one black toner and three color tones, you get the hardware cost.

      model unit-price black-toner color-toner hardware-cost
      2600n 400 75 83 76
      3000n 600 133 130 77
      2605dtn 700 75 83 376
      I think that means you get much better hardware with 2605dtn.
      --
      I once had a signature.
  39. Re:Why even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try $89...

  40. If its free, why not reinstall in 12months by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, is it that much of an effort, to perhaps.... re install after 12 months, or at least
    whipe all info related to time stamps if possible?

    Its just as likely your HD will die, or you need to reinstall any way because of a new MB or CPU
    regardless, so just keep the OS and applications seperate, ie roaming profile.

    If people start writing better apps that dont depend on storing info in windows dirs or registry then its easier
    to reinstall and run again.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:If its free, why not reinstall in 12months by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Why is it that the mouth-breathers who can't spell always think reinstalling your operating system regularly is a perfectly acceptable thing? Upgrade, sure. Try something new? Why not. But reinstalling because the system is designed so poorly that it gets unstable after just USING it?

      Give ya a hint junior, Microsoft ENCOURAGES people to use the registry to store program data.

      Give ya another hint: when I change my motherboard, CPU, ANYTHING in my computer, my operating system doesn't complain. It just loads the correct drivers, and keeps on keepin' on.

      What you people experience isn't normal, nor is it good. It's just what you've been conditioned to believe is The One True Way.

  41. Hi Ari Wins... by SkipRearm · · Score: 0

    Have you seen my brother Slmgr.exe, Slmgr.exe -rearm ?

  42. Microsoft needs to pay to me to use Vista by itz2000 · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft wants me to DOWNGRADE from Linux (Slackware 11) to Vista, they actually needs to pay me.

    Somehow they didn't understand the concept though:P

    1. Re:Microsoft needs to pay to me to use Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, they pay the computer oem's it's time to pay it's users too. I'll consider running vista for 300$/year when it releases it's fixes.

    2. Re:Microsoft needs to pay to me to use Vista by itz2000 · · Score: 0

      I will consider running a vista only if they pay me for the computer I will trash using vista, and it must be laptop cause I wouldn't use it at home anyway (Linux>Win, you all know that), so they need to pay me 1000$ a year or so.

  43. Slashdot's spite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Vista/IE7 is putting their pet operating systems to shame, Slashdot begins openly advocating the pirating of Microsoft's products.

    How very "fair and balanced"!!!

    1. Re:Slashdot's spite by fireylord · · Score: 1

      to shame? that's a matter of opinion pet operating systems indeed :)

  44. not such a big deal by Danathar · · Score: 1

    You don't need to be 100% effective to stop 90% of piracy, and that is what the license stuff does. Everybody knows that you can get around Fairplay by ripping your CD's after burning them in itunes.

    It's the same with most security measures. Take a wall across the southern border. Sure, you will have people who tunnel through or ladder over, but not the crazy amount that's crossing now. The point is to make the border MANAGEABLE.

    Security is not a 100% secure or not all game as some would have you believe.

    1. Re:not such a big deal by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that you can get around Fairplay by ripping your CD's after burning them in itunes.

      One more time, say it with me; that is NOT getting around Fairplay. In that situation Fairplay is doing precisely what it was designed to do - make piracy more annoying. It degrades the audio quality (and if you can't tell the difference, YOU are the a-hole, and a liar to boot) and it adds an additional step which most people will not take.

      Everyone knows you cannot eliminate piracy. These means are meant to reduce it as much as is economically feasible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:not such a big deal by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Everybody knows that you can get around Fairplay by ripping your CD's after burning them in itunes.

      How about just buying the CDs and ripping them yourself with a free software tool?

      If you're an honest music lover (like me) then the best way of showing that is demonstrating that you won't buy music in a restricted format. No "protected" CD I have ever encountered could not be ripped by using either cdparanoia in Linux or Exact Audio Copy in Windows - and both are free software.

      And if you believe CDs only have one or two good tracks on each one (which is why you personally prefer downloads), then I suggest you're listening to the wrong sort of music...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  45. pianos can't be copied on CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe because you can't get a piano except by actually buying one.

    1. Re:pianos can't be copied on CDs by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      This is where I explain to you there is more to life than computers.

      I run a Linux based OS because i needed something that would collect my data and let me run applications. I can't run the latest and greatest FPS. Which is fine, because there is more to life than computers. Giving in and handing MSFT money and buying games from people who don't respect my freedoms just seems really counter productive. I accept that the vendors don't seem to care about the ever growing minority and pursue other things that make me happy.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:pianos can't be copied on CDs by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      This is where I explain to you there is more to life than computers.

      Surely you jest.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:pianos can't be copied on CDs by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Sadly in my case, not much more. Bleh.

      Oh slashdot, comfort me so!

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:pianos can't be copied on CDs by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Don't feel too bad; I've got a horror of an animation job with a short deadline, so the only time I've left my house in the last two weeks was to buy cigarettes on Tuesday. Slashdot is more or less my social life at the moment.

      Damn, that's pathetic...nothing personal.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  46. Message from Microsoft by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to pay your $399 licensing fee, you cock-smoking teabaggers.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  47. Re:More DRM madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my school, we can rollout any software or OS to about 350 computers in 1 to 20 minutes, without ever touching any of those PCs - using the magic of (intelligent) imaging technology. We currently have about 12 completely different hardware configurations, grown throughout the years, but need only one image for all of them. With XP corporate, no problem; with Vista: No way. Nice "upgrade" there. This means twenty times the work, but perhaps we can get this down to only ten times if we finally master the crappiness that is RIS, MSI, etc., set up a shiny new 2003 activation server, ... Someone please shoot me.

  48. Your point? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    I am sure you have a point in there somewhere, but if you cant be bothered to format and preview, I certainly can't be bothered to read it.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    1. Re:Your point? by Cythrawl · · Score: 1

      Yes I forgot... The point is he didnt look too hard. I dont know about you but if I ever get to work on a PC from IBM, Dell, HP, Etc they are filled with so much crap that its slows it down to a snailpace, crashes, etc... Just re-install the OS fresh and 90% of the issues go away.. Damn formatting

    2. Re:Your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the 'restore' disk or whatever load that junk the same way? I was under the impression that your only real option was to uninstall everything manually.

      I really can't stand Aero. It slows the machine down way too much. For some reason I also find the machine a LOT easier to use with it turned off. I think that means I'm getting old and stuck in my ways =/

      Anyway with Aero off and a clean install Vista is usable for most business purposes. But we build whitebox machines so I can't say how it will fair on something like a cheap Dell.

  49. Using a sledge hammer where a toy hammer will do.. by numbski · · Score: 1

    Linux isn't all that different from Vista in one (very remote) regard, and that's the the whole thing of "the right distro for the right job".

    Here we have a pretty simple philosophy - Mac OS X or Kubuntu for Desktops, FreeBSD or Mac OS X Server on servers. If Linux is required on the servers, then we use Gentoo.

    Of course, if you're 'l33t' you can use the most powerful tool for every job. I *could* run FreeBSD or Gentoo on my own personal Desktop. Would I recommend anyone else do so?

    Nope. :P

    Actually, that's not true. When I first bring an employee on board, their experience with Linux will go like this (if they're unintiated): install Kubuntu on their desktop. ("Wow, that was easy!")

    Install a few apps, Firefox namely if it isn't in there already (don't recall...), then pull up the Gentoo page, download the latest iso.

    Now, install Gentoo on this box over here. Be sure to be meticulous about the instructions. Before you begin make sure you note what type of cpu you're using, vid card, sound card, etc. Call me when you're done. Not if you have problems, call me when you're DONE.

    That usually buys me peace for a few days. :) When they're done however, they'll have an understanding of how Linux partitions work, a minor grasp on how make, works, and that there are reasons some things are easy, and some are just plain HARD.

    Anyhoo....those are the extremes. Fedora is cool in that it sets up LVM2 by default for you, which is pretty sweet. The day FreeBSD gets LVM2 capabilities I will cry. That is the one thing I really wish FreeBSD had, and the reason I went ahead and bought a Coraid unit running debian for our storage arrays. :)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  50. No... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    Tag it: "effectivebyaccident"!

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  51. Edited final quote by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    "Windows Vista ... designed to ... prevent the software from working correctly".
    Hmmm, wonder what it says when played backwards at 78RPM.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  52. So can XP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and it's ridiculously easy to bypass. It's all about timing and knowing which keys to press. I wouldn't be surprised if the same method can be used in Vista.

  53. And to you I say... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    haha

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  54. that's no accident by nanosquid · · Score: 1

    Windows Vista can be run for at least a year without being activated, a serious end-run around one of Microsoft's key anti-piracy measures,

    That's no accident, that's more like the time period to get you hooked on the drug even though you know it's bad for you. They figure that once you've been using it for a year, you'll pay.

  55. Go beyond Vista by dark-br · · Score: 1

    Activation crack or not you probably need a new computer to run Vista. Perfect opportunity to get a Mac and start enjoying a completely new world...

    1. Re:Go beyond Vista by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Just keep the old machine and throw Linux on it - then it'll look and feel like a brand new machine.

      And having personally played with computers for 30-odd years and worked on them for 25 years, I have never found the need or had the desire to buy one single Apple product.

      I've no doubt people like their products but they are, and always will be, a niche market.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  56. Re:More DRM madness by QMO · · Score: 1

    I think that Microsoft going under is very unlikely.

    I think that Microsoft deciding to no longer activate Windows XP is not nearly so unlikely. I still use MS-DOS 6.22 sometimes, and I don't need continuing permission from Microsoft to use it. Are you confident that I'll be able to install XP 10 years from now?

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  57. Direct violation of DMCA by davek · · Score: 1

    Livingston, who publishes the Windows Secrets newsletter, said that a single change to Vista's registry lets users put off the operating system's product activation requirement an additional eight times beyond the three disclosed last month. And such a change is a direct violation of the DMCA. It circumvents the digital copy protection mechanism embedded within the software. Totally illegal. And the fact that it was published in an American magazine leaves them wide open for a lawsuit.

    That's what these laws do: make it almost irresistible to commit the crime so that a vast majority of people do, and then you can selectively enforce the law on those you don't like. Classic totalitarian behavior.

    It makes me sick.
    --
    6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
    1. Re:Direct violation of DMCA by toejam316 · · Score: 0

      No. It doesn't circumvent it. It delays it. Thats like saying that running from a bullet is going to stop you getting shot. The bullet travels well over 700FPS, I doubt you could out run it, maybe just last a little longer.

  58. DRM is not the right word, but... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    It's certainly not DRM, but activation and DRM share a common trait: both are used exclusively to take control away from the user and gives it to the company selling the product.

    Perhaps we should stop using DRM in favour of some arbitrary acronym, like Artificial Restriction Software, or User Restricting Measures, or something like that? Or maybe it should just be Defective By Design...

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  59. Not even if it were legally free by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want Vista even if it were given to me by Microsoft for free. There doesn't seem to be anything that I would want with the new OS. I'm not into having tightly locked down DRM. I'm not into system reboots every few days. I'm not into having security holes big enough to drive a convoy of semi's through (sure they found a new security hole in OpenBSD, but...). No, I just don't see any reason. XP was my last MS OS, I think I'll be happier on OpenBSD; it hasn't failed me yet and I don't need the latest and greatest hardware.

  60. Microsoft did this on purpose... by asCii88 · · Score: 0

    ...to make more people download and install it, and then with those infected computers take over the world.

  61. Fwiw by KKlaus · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is not really saying black is white there, and I think it's because you've confused what they meant when they say "customer." They don't mean windows user.

    If WGA flags your OS as non-genuine, there are two cases (well three). The first is that you pirated the software, and then you are _not_ an MS customer, and they don't really care about your benefit.

    The second case then is that you paid money expecting genuine software, and apparently you got screwed. That non-trivially sized class of people is in fact interested in genuine software, which is why they payed money instead of pirating, and they are happy to be notified, assuming MS is reasonable and efficient about giving them the software that they really already paid for.

    The third class is the class that are falsely flagged, and of course for them it's all bad, but to the extent that MS doesn't _try_ to code things poorly, this isn't an intending group, and hopefully over time is eliminated.

    So I'm not trying to say WGA isn't to MS's benefit too, I'm just saying it's hardly Orwellian doublespeak. Let's be disciplined in our Microsoft bashing.

    --
    Relax I just want some peanuts.
    1. Re:Fwiw by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      You analyze things quite fairly. I do have one item on which I disagree, though: the most pro-consumer thing to do would be to notify the user if their copy is non-genuine. There is no need to, in addition, lock down the copy (into 'restricted mode').

      The lockdown is certainly not in consumers' interest, only Microsoft's.

    2. Re:Fwiw by KKlaus · · Score: 1

      True. Does it do that now? In its original incarnation it just pestered the user, and (maybe) cut off updates. But point well taken nonetheless.

      --
      Relax I just want some peanuts.
  62. Re:Why even bother? by j79zlr · · Score: 1

    OSX is $129, and a 5-user family pack is $199. So technically you could buy 10 licenses of OSX for the price of Vista Ultimate. Sometimes I wonder if these people are affliated with Microsoft.

    --
    I'm not not licking toads.
  63. Re:Why even bother? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Try $89... Are you just going to look at the pretty install CDs all day, or are you going to buy something to run them on?
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  64. pet operating system by morethanapapercert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IIRC, the PET operating system was BASIC wasn't it? Then some shame is quite appropriate as I am ashamed to admit I still have a "cheat sheet" of PEEK and POKE codes around here somewhere that I used as a reference when writing my very first program. (A steerable rocket ship and asteroids made up of ASCII characters. The asteroids didn't break apart properly but I got an A anyway because I was able to squeeze the whole program into only three cassette tapes!)

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:pet operating system by operagost · · Score: 1

      Amateur. You should have used a single C-90 tape!

      Seriously, I'm impressed. Was the PET's write density that poor, or did you have a ridiculous amount of RAM in that thing? My VIC with the 3K RAM expansion could fit several programs on one side of a 60 minute tape.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:pet operating system by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      They had been bulk-erased tapes the school handed out. (and we had to give back after the class was over) I think they had been answering machine tapes in a previous life. There was no time or length info on them that I can recall, but they definitely had less tape than the average cassette and had a variety of labels. (Some said Tandy, most had names I'd never heard of before or since)

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  65. Marketing Slogan: by norminator · · Score: 1

    Tag it: "defectivebyaccident"!
    Tag it: "effectivebyaccident"!

    I think we can mash these up for a new Vista slogan: Defective by design, effective by accident!.
  66. Vendor Lock-In Drives me to Mac by br0d · · Score: 1

    I use proprietary software both at home and work that will not run on Linux. Not being able to re-use Microsoft licenses eliminates the cost advantage of running Windows on homebuilt machines, when compared to more expensive Macs. Costs being equal, I dislike Microsoft more, so I will switch to Mac. It's pretty simple, but Microsoft continues to think that their Genuine Repudiation Tool is going to build their market, rather than lose it.

    1. Re:Vendor Lock-In Drives me to Mac by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      "I use proprietary software both at home and work that will not run on Linux. Not being able to re-use Microsoft licenses eliminates the cost advantage of running Windows on homebuilt machines, when compared to more expensive Macs. Costs being equal, I dislike Microsoft more, so I will switch to Mac. It's pretty simple, but Microsoft continues to think that their Genuine Repudiation Tool is going to build their market, rather than lose it."

      Interesting, but...

      You can't reuse Windows OEM licenses. Macs are also proprietary. There is nothing that would indicate that a proprietary Windows application would be available on the Mac OS.

      The ONLY way out of the "propretary" mess you have is by switching to a neutral platform.

      In any case, I ALSO need to run applications that are "not available on Linux". Nor on Mac. ONLY Windows. I run VMware server (free) on Linux, and (currently) Windows XP under that. Microsoft has "seen through" my ploy -- VISTA can only be licensed to run this way if I buy the "ultimate" (whatever) edition. Fortunately, I don't need it (as yet).

      The Mac? Another trap...

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  67. Re:Why bother? (now Mac) by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I know this is "the oldest troll in the book" ... telling people to "get a Mac!" when they complain about Windows.

    But I was going to say a couple things about that.

    1. SPSS is available for OS X on the Mac, not just Windows.

    2. Now is really a pretty good time for developers to take the Mac seriously for gaming, and write some quality stuff in OpenGL. Microsoft has Direct-X 10 out as the "latest and greatest thing", but it requires Vista to work, not to mention an expensive new video card. (You can get a new nVidia GeForce 8800 series starting at about $300 that supports it, but no games use it yet.) There haven't been many really "big hits" released in the PC gaming market lately either. So an amazing new game title, available only, or even first on Mac could really convert some more folks to using a Mac. (Some developers are even saying pretty negative things about Direct-X 10 right now... a stark contrast to the level of interest previous updates seemed to generate.)

    3. As Blizzard has, no doubt, learned -- writing for OpenGL means sales to users of both PC and Mac platforms is relatively painless. With Mac sales doing as well as they have the last few years, I can't see why you'd pick "Let's write for the new Direct-X and only be able to sell to Vista users." vs. "Let's write in OpenGL and sell to PC users running any of a number of versions of Windows, PLUS OS X Mac users!"?

  68. Sure by kseise · · Score: 1

    but why would you want to?

  69. Windows Vista can be run for at least a year .. by katsklaw · · Score: 1

    "Windows Vista can be run for at least a year without being activated". OMFG that is so AWSOME! *n?x can do it for decades.

    1. Re:Windows Vista can be run for at least a year .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So can VxWorks... but you still wouldn't want it on your desktop, haha

    2. Re:Windows Vista can be run for at least a year .. by katsklaw · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your point. Both Windows and *n?x have suitable desktop capabilities, so where did you desktop comparision come from? Or are you one of those that insert an opinion into a factual statement? Namly stating either Windows or *n?x are not desktop suitable because of your own bias opinion.

    3. Re:Windows Vista can be run for at least a year .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post sounded like a long stretch to find a bragging point for *n?x when pretty much everything else can already do this. Everyone thought it was the end of the world when XP required activation, except it was easy to do, and there were even versions that didn't.

      Most *n?x doesn't require activation, but then, many of them are 20-30+ years old. DOS doesn't require it, MacOS 7 doesn't require it, OS/2 doesn't require it... so I just thought it was funny that you'd point it out for *n?x.

  70. Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the incorrect procedure for installing Gentoo. Ok, first download Sabayon - a great XGL/AIGLX Gentoo distro then start it up and install from the icon on the desktop. Then use Firefox if you need anything else - there is a wealth of information online. I don't suggest Gentoo though for newbies - go with PCLinuxOS.

  71. Re:Why even bother? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    Assuming you already have a Mac. If not, the Mac Mini's start right about what the GP said.

  72. You don't need to be 10% effective, even... by argent · · Score: 1

    You don't need to be 100% effective to stop 90% of piracy,

    Well, assuming you mean "90% of casual piracy" and accepting that the number is pulled out of the air...

    No, you don't even need to be 10% effective. All you need to do to stop 90% of casual piracy is to put any kind of barrier at all, even just a CD key.

    But to get much more than that, you need to be pretty damn close to 100% effective, because once you get past people who aren't stopped by an "honor system" reminder you're climbing a pretty steep curve... because it's a small step from using a stolen key to using a canned patch or script, and a canned patch can defeat pretty much anything it's possible to defeat.

    So while it's not a big deal, it still demonstrates that Microsoft's customer bashing is futile.

    1. Re:You don't need to be 10% effective, even... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem today is that "casual piracy" is getting pretty common. So common that many people I know would never even consider paying any amount for software. It is as if it is their right to download stuff and use it.

      This attitude is not something that fosters development. There are plenty of people that thought they could make a living at publishing shareware in the 1980's. Until the 5% rule came into effect - only about 5% (average) pay for shareware. It was then either "go pro" or go back to the day job because doing what you love would never, ever give you enough money to eat.

      Yes, there are people that value their time at zero and give whatever they do away. Wonderful - we can all benefit from their generosity. But these people will never be able to live off doing something they want to do - they will instead have a day job they hate and live for a hobby that can never be more than that.

      Compare this to someone that makes doll clothes. While it can be a hobby, it can also be something they do that brings in enough money to live on so they don't have to do anything else, ever. Sure, they aren't going to get rich but maybe they will be happy.

      Today's casual piracy and the implicit understanding that is OK because everyone is doing it and nobody is going to jail eliminates the middle ground between hobby and professional. And don't think it is limited to teens with no money. If it is easy, everyone is doing it. Heck, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates probably have some pirated software, music or movies.

    2. Re:You don't need to be 10% effective, even... by argent · · Score: 1

      The problem today is that "casual piracy" is getting pretty common. So common that many people I know would never even consider paying any amount for software. It is as if it is their right to download stuff and use it.

      I suspect that it depends who you ask, and when you ask. When I was in college in the early '80s, "many people I know would never even consider paying any amount for software". This isn't "today's casual piracy", this isn't a new thing, this isn't a change, this is the same situation that's been there as long as the *concept* of selling personal computer software has been around. If the people you know are technical, if they can write software, they're less likely to buy it, and more likely to know where to get the cracks. If you know people who aren't technical, you'll find more of them buying software because the cost in time of finding the stuff is more than the money they're spending on it.

      And, most people *can't* make a living off their hobbies. Most people making dolls clothes or stuffed toy clowns make most of their money doing something else. Most garage bands never quit their day jobs. Most shareware doesn't take off. And the ones that do, no matter what their hobbies are... programming, playing music, sewing... do it by running their hobby like a business.

      That means accepting the 5% and coming out with new products all the time, spending as much time coding new programs as the guy making dolls clothes spends making dolls clothes, selling the product for cheap enough that people will spend the money instead of ripping you off, for Toys-R-Us prices. Or writing bespoke one-at-a-time software for people... what we call "being a contractor".

      So, no, the fact that you can't make a living writing one great shareware application and make a living off it and not have people pirate it or clone it (and it doesn't matter if it's Microsoft or the Free Software Foundation who clones it) has nothing to do with whether Microsoft needs to treat their users like crooks.

  73. If Vista was impossible to pirate, Apple.. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    IMHO, there will be a way to pirate Vista soon enough. Heck, if the pirates can't find a way in 6 months, Microsoft will probably push an auto-update through that leaves an obvious and trivial hole for pirates to do so.

    The last thing Microsoft wants is for end users to switch to Linux or OSX. MS makes 10x more per user on corporate users than home users anyway. Home users eventually influence business users...

    In fact, I'll bet that deep in Apple strategy rooms, they're plotting a timeline for releasing Mac OSX on generic x86 machines (with only reasonable *wink* anti-piracy measures).

    1. Re:If Vista was impossible to pirate, Apple.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soon enough?

      try PARADOX OEM BIOS with the Asus/HP/Lenevo Root OEM Certificate, Bios Emulator and OEM Serial

      Used it for at least a week
      Go Dreamscene!

  74. Makes sense to me by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    How else is Microsoft going to get their product into the hands of people fed up with their crap except by promoting "piracy"?

    Didn't somebody at Microsoft just say recently that they'd rather have the Chinese pirating Windows than using Linux?

    Bill Gates is no longer relying on his monopoly contracts with resellers. Now he's actively relying on "piracy" to sell his crap - as long as it results in the same end-user lock-in he's been relying on for years with corporate systems.

    This is how big a threat Linux is to his consumer base. Just because Linux only has two or three percent of the market, and Apple another two or three percent, doesn't mean Bill doesn't see this as his doom in the future. So he heads it off now by doing whatever is necessary to insure that people use HIS crap, and not somebody's else's.

    That's why he's giving away his OS products to students for free, and even only charging Australian students $75 for Office whereas before Office was not included.

    Lock-in. Monopoly.

    It's the Microsoft way.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  75. Make my day... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Microsoft-- just continue to make it difficult for even legal users to use your system, rather than getting smart and realizing that the OS is a fading revenue stream for you and consequently porting all your apps (which is where any future revenue stream lies) to Linux, before it's too late. If Microsoft actually had the slightest of brains, they'd make sure SQL Server and Office and their language products (which actually, aren't all that badly designed products) ran on Linux before things like MySQL, Oracle, DB2, OpenOffice, etc.. get too much of a foothold there, leaving no place for them when they finally see the writing on the wall.

    Microsoft's OS products were never why people bought their computers. For the most part, it's the office products that were their gravy train, the OS was just a delivery system. Well, guess what-- the delivery system is heading towards common carrier status where the percieved value of it is dropping and ultimately must be both standardized and open, in order for the computer industry to grow. Microsoft is painting themselves into a corner, which at the moment is still a pretty big corner, but one that is trending smaller, and in fact, has the capability to even crash if the application sets elsewhere were to finally convince Big Business(TM) to jump ship-- and we all know that Big Business(TM) is not the type to feel any loyalty to Microsoft...

  76. May be possible? by kingturkey · · Score: 1

    What do they mean by "it may even be possible to find a way to postpone activation indefinitely."? It already is possible, as a simple google search proves.

  77. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just run out steal a copy and install it over my linux! Thank god for those DUMB microsoft fucks!

  78. Vista can RUN??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crawl maby...