Slashdot Mirror


College Demands RIAA Pay Up For Wasting Its Time

An anonymous reader writes "We've already seen the University of Wisconsin tell the RIAA to go away, but the University of Nebaska has gone one step further: it's asking the RIAA to pay up for wasting its time with the silly demand to push students into paying up. The spokesperson for the University also notes that since they constantly rotate IP addresses and have no need to hang onto that information for very long, they simply cannot help the RIAA. They have no clue who was attached to which IP address at the time the RIAA is complaining about."

261 comments

  1. Good by dlhm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should stick it to 'em as hard as the riaa is sticking it to everyone else!!

    --
    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit!
    1. Re:Good by servo335 · · Score: 1

      Wow this whole day of slashdot has been mostly made up of people fighting back against the RIAA. About time people develope a back bone!!

    2. Re:Good by Gerzel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think "as hard" is appropriate esp since I believe that the RIAA, from what I have seen, is abusing the US legal and court system and their political and monetary power (yes monetary power CAN be abused).

      While I don't know if the RIAA has done anything in particular illegal (though I am fairly sure they have somewhere along the line) I still see the trends in their lawsuits and tactics as abusive and deserving of a civil (if that really counts between two very large organizations neither of which are really citizens) hearing.

    3. Re:Good by BlueTrin · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    4. Re:Good by Ayal.Rosenthal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hell yes. The key to enforcing copyright protection is not by suing Universities and other centers of learning, its about influencing consumer behavior. When the last time anyone bought a CD?!?! (except for the BS reason "to support the band"... go their show instead)

      --
      Social liberal, fiscal conservative, always sarcastic.
    5. Re:Good by teflaime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that if you buy it directly from the band, they get the profit...Well, okay, I listen to mostly indie acts with no label so they sell their own CDs...Yeah, I know. I'm a deviant.

    6. Re:Good by chrismcdirty · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    7. Re:Good by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      Frequently... after checking RIAA Radar, of course!

    8. Re:Good by thegameiam · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think cdbaby is a fantastic resource for unsigned bands...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    9. Re:Good by EonBlueTooL · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I moused over your link I read hitler=riaa [http://yro.slashdot.org/firehose.pl?fhfilter=riaa ]

    10. Re:Good by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And this one

      Rich

    11. Re:Good by nomadic · · Score: 1

      (except for the BS reason "to support the band"... go their show instead)

      And if the musicians I prefer to listen to don't do shows?

    12. Re:Good by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, if you don't live in the band's area, you aren't really going to get a chance to support them except every few years. And a lot of my favorite bands don't do large tours.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    13. Re:Good by bendodge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The simply use the bully factor: $GENERIC_OFFICIAL Joe here at City Hall desk is scared and/or impressed by big rich corporate lawyers who show up first in his mailbox with lots of legal-speak on official-looking stationary, and then at his desk orating about the big bad copyright infringements going on in this town, so Joe gives them his cooperates and thinks he is doing everyone a favor.

      And typically, the honest old County Judge is rather confused by all the technical mumbo-jumbo, but naturally sees it the RIAA's way when the RIAA's lawyers give him a nice (although somewhat misleading) explanation about IP addresses and file-sharing. The local ISP is also cowed by the pile of legal junk in the mail, and helpfully provides all the logs and whatnot the lawyers demand.

      Where this all falls apart is when you have a local officials who are savvy or refuse to do anything until they get savvy and understand everything. Don't get me wrong; people do need punished for their illegal activities. But the RIAA simply isn't a government agency that can push people around.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    14. Re:Good by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And a lot of my favorite bands don't do large tours.

      Right, I don't think the Beatles have been in my area recently.

      Seriously, there is a huge misconception with most Slashdotters, who assume everyone else listens to the same music they do, which judging by the audience seems to be solely vaguely alternative/hard rock garage bands of dubious talent.

    15. Re:Good by Ayal.Rosenthal · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected... if you would like to support your favorite band, please please please visit their myspace page (such as http://www.myspace.com/classiccase). There should be a way through that. And if your band doesn't have a myspace page, well then I have no useful advice.

      --
      Social liberal, fiscal conservative, always sarcastic.
    16. Re:Good by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      I agree, in fact I think most of my myspace friends are bands.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    17. Re:Good by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      That works great if music for you is about making a political statement...

      But the problem is that most indie "artists" are still independent because they make crap music. Yeah, there are a few really good ones in there. But good luck finding them before the labels snap them up.

      I don't want to listen to caterwauling over out-of-tune guitars and drums with palpitations just so I can feel good about circumventing the mafiaa.

    18. Re:Good by thegnu · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the problem is that most indie "artists" are still independent because they make crap music. Yeah, there are a few really good ones in there. But good luck finding them before the labels snap them up.

      You just like pop music, dude. Looky:

      Modest Mouse (indie from 1994-2001)
      Built to Spill
      Ted Leo and the Pharmacists
      Mano Negra (their good stuff was before the major)
      Gogol Bordello
      Pavement
      The Pixies
      the Dead Kennedys
      NOFX (good until Heavy Petting Zoo) ...[a loooong list of punk bands]...
      Frank Black has not been snatched up
      The Breeders
      The Smoking Popes

      and the inverse:
      Nickelback
      Creed
      Fergie
      (need I say more?)

      You are on bad crack. If anyone wants to contribute to my lists, please do.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    19. Re:Good by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 1

      Has there ever really been a "civil" case?Barad Dûr, Mordor

      --
      Consider yourself spoken to.
    20. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on, you know that it's absolutely unfair to compare Hitler to the RIAA! ...apologise to Hitler, now!

      (Yeah, I know, that was absolutely tasteless... and I don't actually think that the RIAA could ever even come close to being comparable to Hitler. Just saying. In any case, you probably can see why I post this as AC)

    21. Re:Good by Knightking · · Score: 1

      And how many hundreds of indie bands are complete shit? Giving a short list that are good doesn't refute that most of them aren't.

    22. Re:Good by teflaime · · Score: 1

      You're counter arguement is unconvincing because most signed bands are shit too. Hell, they're making tv shows to create these crap bands now. Labels don't sign bands because they make good music. They sign bands because the bands are marketable to appeal to the 18-34 demographic (which, according to market research, is the demographic that buys the most music).

    23. Re:Good by thegnu · · Score: 1

      You're counter arguement is unconvincing because most signed bands are shit too.

      That's exactly what I'm saying. GP said that most indie bands were shit, so I was pointing out both some good music that refuted his point a, and a very small portion of some of the most detestable "music" that I have ever heard, to refute hit point b. GP implies that a band gets signed because it's good, and not because it's agreeable to being exploited. Why don't you make your own list? I'm sure that if every slashdotter who cared spent 5 minutes writing down good indie bands and 5 minutes writing down bad mainstream music, or as I usually call it, "mainstream music," we'd have huge lists on both sides.

      The burden of proof is not on me to provide a complete list. I'm just pointing out that GP doesn't pay any meaningful attention to the music scene, which allows him to say stupid things like he said. It seems like you completely agree with me, however, and just disagree with how I said it.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    24. Re:Good by teflaime · · Score: 1

      and just disagree with how I said it. Nah. Actually, I just replied to the wrong messge:P.

    25. Re:Good by thegnu · · Score: 1

      And how many hundreds of indie bands are complete shit? Giving a short list that are good doesn't refute that most of them aren't.

      GP said that indie bands are shit, and "But good luck finding them before the labels snap them up." I gave a short list of counterexamples to TWO of his assumptions, the tip of the iceberg, to indicate that he's just not knowledgeable/smokes crack. How many hundreds of bands, period, are complete shit? There are fewer mainstream bands than indie bands, so there's actually more good AND bad in the indie scene.

      It's like people who tell you that you can't trust the internet, only because they can't tell that Bill Gates actually ISN'T going to give them money for forwarding this email. Or like people who are still stuck on the Beatles because "there's no good music nowadays." I bet there's some sort of analogy about cars I could make, too. But I won't. So there.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  2. RIAA needs to pay me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For wasting my time with all these frivolous lawsuits I have to read about...

    1. Re:RIAA needs to pay me... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 4, Funny

      RIAA needs to pay me..

      Better get that plane ticket to Soviet Russia then. I've heard the time travel costs extra.
    2. Re:RIAA needs to pay me... by danpsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For wasting my time with all these frivolous lawsuits I have to read about...

      Seriously. You know honestly, the RIAA reminds me of the people fighting for prohibition. In the end it's going to lose because everyone is still drinking the booze (stealing the music) and all the legal action in the world isn't going to stop it. So you might as well just come to the conclusion that it's going to happen. I personally say let's make it legal!

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    3. Re:RIAA needs to pay me... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Have you ever read liquor control laws? Booze is very regulated. Try for a better analogy, please.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:RIAA needs to pay me... by LinuxDon · · Score: 1

      That's actually the reason why the Netherlands "legalized" weed, too many people were using it and they couldn't stop them.
      But then again, the legal system here seems to have use lot more common sense than it does in America.

    5. Re:RIAA needs to pay me... by geschild · · Score: 1

      There's still this 'war on drugs' and it doesn't look like it's going to go away anytime soon, even though most sane people (top economists, for instance) have declared it a complete failure.

      It's a nice thought. Just don't hold your breath, will ya?

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
  3. Welcome to ... by BlueTrin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome to RIAADot
    News for lawyers, trials that matters ...

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    1. Re:Welcome to ... by solevita · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The **AA seems to be a bit like terrorism; they only win if you allow yourself to be scared by them.

      It seems like the **AA really have got a hold of Slashdot. Oh well, it's April's fools day next week. Let's hope that in two weeks Slashdot starts posting some higher quality stories.

    2. Re:Welcome to ... by Drakin020 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot Categories

      (As seen to the left)

      RIAAdot Categories

      College Students
      Single Mothers
      Dissabled Vets
      Household pets
      The Deceased
      Newborn babies
      People without internet

      No one is safe from the law!

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    3. Re:Welcome to ... by Gospodin · · Score: 4, Funny

      This really worries me, since I use USAA for a lot of my insurance and banking.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    4. Re:Welcome to ... by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 1

      See what happens when you read to fast and are tired?

      I saw Household Vets and Disabled Pets

    5. Re:Welcome to ... by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      In another reality, the Heisenberg cat still lives and USAA sues you for stealing the Usenet.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    6. Re:Welcome to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Didn't you mean?

      Welcome to RIAADot
      News for IANALs, trials that matters ...

    7. Re:Welcome to ... by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Touche. However, since the suit won't result in revenue until the following year, I was able to countersue USAA for thinking beyond the next quarterly report.

      I think I'll have a Heisenburger for lunch... or not.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    8. Re:Welcome to ... by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      The proper spelling is either [(RI)|(MP)]AA or the Music And Film Industry Association of America (MAFIAA).

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    9. Re:Welcome to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us ARE lawyers, you insensitive clod.

  4. Perhaps by rblancarte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that we are seeing that people are finally getting fed up with the RIAA. Their tactics are quasi-illegal, and their manners are boorish. Maybe 2007 is the year that people finally get wise and stand up to the RIAA. A few losses in court, which IMHO are pretty much a slam dunk, and I think we will see the RIAA have to stand down this attack on music consumers.

    What has disappointed me was the fact that no one has stood up to them before to finally beat them in court. There has to be a first case and once there is, it will set the precedent.

    RonB

    --
    It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    1. Re:Perhaps by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think in this case it's people getting tired of RIAA making demands on overworked IT departments in what often amounts to warrantless fishing expeditions. I don't think the colleges in question approve of illegal music swapping, but merely that they have better things to do. The attack on RIAA from the legal side is much more interesting, and I wonder if the courts are beginning themselves to tire of what seem to be nuisance lawsuits that often have very little evidentiary backing.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Perhaps by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Add to that the fact that CD sales are dropping by, what, 20% a year and the entire industry may be dead in a few.

      Good riddance to bad rubbish. Now, how about we see to the MPAA...

    3. Re:Perhaps by rez_rat · · Score: 1

      Slashdot... there really needs to be a "No shit!" mod. Just for those times when you really wanna agree and say, "No SHIT!"

      S-

    4. Re:Perhaps by sconeu · · Score: 1

      According to the local news (NBC affiliate) it's all the fault of those Evil Content Pirates(tm) [phrasing mine -- they said "illegal downloads"]

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:Perhaps by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Yeah I hope that it will end all of these cases where individuals get attacked without solid proofs by large corporations.
      Their tactics are really questionable, instead of going to the source, they seem to attack many users which did not really made a difference in piracy on a global level. While I do not know if this has a real effect on most of the users, it seems very questionable in terms of prejudice compared to the damage caused by the users of P2P programs.
      If they went against people who are actively sharing only for the purpose of sharing, I could understand from their point of view, but they just go after users who would not buy their stuff anyway.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    6. Re:Perhaps by BlueTrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At least DVD have extra contents, I used to buy at least 4 CDs for every movie I would watch. Now since the DVDs are quite cheap and they improved alot the marketing (adding nice packaging and extra features), I do buy alot more DVDs than CDs.

      Personally, I have alot more pleasure watching my DVD collection than seeing all these overpriced CDs with no-extra content and which are quite expensive only because of the majors. Not that I endorse the MPAA but at least the movie industry made more efforts than the music industry to renew themselves.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    7. Re:Perhaps by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Now, how about we see to the MPAA...

      Screw these piss-ants! How about we see to the election ??

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Perhaps by griffjon · · Score: 1

      Hell, I've been intentionally boycotting the RIAA since they took AudioGalaxy down, and by accident even before then (their affiliated labels so rarely have any good music on them). I'm sad it's taken this long for the loathing to spread outside of the geek circles.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    9. Re:Perhaps by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I love it when someone stands up to a bully. It gives me hope that there is still some decency left in the public realm when an institution like University of Nebraska, who's got a lot to lose, tells the RIAA to go pound sand.

      I've dealt with University legal departments, and they can be among the most cowardly and smarmy of lawyers (which is like saying the "smelliest shit"), and it's really amazing that the administration of the UofN actually ignored their exposure to tell RIAA that they simply weren't going to be pushed around. I remember when a very powerful guy, who's daughter had committed suicide because of the pressure her religious father put on her because she committed the grevious sin of having a boyfriend, tried to pressure the University that I was working for a the time to give up email records so he could find out who the boyfriend was. It was clear at the time that his intention was to go after this boy for "sinning" with his daughter, which I guess was more important than realizing that it was the father who was the one putting fatal pressure on the girl. I still remember the university attorney, who used to be part of a floating Friday night card game, stood up to the guy and told him that they weren't going to give this father a single email, not a bit of information. He was threatened with violence and professional destruction by this rich and powerful asshole, but the U stood behind the lawyer.

      I love to see a bully getting a boot in the ass. Their arrogant, outraged, sputtering after realizing they aren't going to get their way is priceless.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Perhaps by Blue+Stone · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments in the ablove posts, but I really feel it's important that we drop the figleaf that is the term that is the 'RIAA'.

      The people whose actions so many of us detest, who sue disabled pensioners and little girls who don't even own computers, who whine and bitch and claim the sky is falling every time some new technology comes along, who engage in price fixing, who rip off the artists they claim to represent while simultaneously saying that they're engaging in anti-piracy activity for their benefit (all the time without missing a beat and smiling, smiling, smiling), who LIE to the media and inflate and invent the losses they say they're cost by the eeeeevil pirates...

      THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT THE RIAA.

      THEY ARE THE 'MAJOR' RECORD COMPANIES.

      (And their number is legion)

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    11. Re:Perhaps by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Although I'm on the university's side about this... I somehow doubt that their claims are 100% accurate. If the FBI showed up with evidence that somebody had been using their networks for illegal purposes, I'm pretty sure they'd suddenly discover that log data in a dusty server room somewhere...

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    12. Re:Perhaps by celardore · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ugh... I just tried to mod you "obvious".

    13. Re:Perhaps by kimvette · · Score: 1

      RIAA:

      I quit buying CDs, and I do not download music either. I spend my entertainment dollars on DVDs and on-demand cable. Last month I purchased 22 DVDs. January I bought about 15. This month I purchased about nine. (and FYI I have not had time to watch more than a few of them, I rip them to xvid format and listen to them on my PocketPC at the office).

      Fuck you very much RIAA.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    14. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Maybe 2007 is the year that people finally get wise

      wrong!

      2007 is the year of Linux in the desktop!

    15. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still remember the university attorney, who used to be part of a floating Friday night card game, stood up to the guy and told him that they weren't going to give this father a single email, not a bit of information.

      Did these email messages belong to the student? If so, now that she is dead, they belong to her estate.

      Being part of the estate, they may end up in the parent's hands anyway, once probate and other things get dealt with.

    16. Re:Perhaps by lysse · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Perhaps by shoptroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ESA > The TV Networks > MPAA > RIAA in terms of who's getting the clue the fastest. At least in my book. At least the TV Networks are readily flirting with putting shows up on the web for viewing by consumers at no cost (as long as you don't mind and ad every 15 minutes... snack break anyone?). On the other hand, we get the RIAA attempting to shut down Internet Radio as we know it. At least the TV networks are trying to match the pirates with near equiavalent (in terms of cost to the consumer and accessibility) services.

      In terms of CD sales.... Well let's see. I can get a DVD for a new movie for ~$20 which is 2 hours long (more with extra features) and will play in my laptop, game machine or DVD player. Or I can get a CD for $16 which is about an hour long, and if I'm lucky I don't get a rootkit or can't rip it to put on my MP3 player or to use as part of a custom playlist in my games. You tell me why CD sales aren't hot.

      Anyways, lousy week for the RIAA it sounds.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    18. Re:Perhaps by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they'd suddenly discover that log data in a dusty server room somewhere...

      You can't uncover a data log that doesn't exist. Long ago in a Galaxy far away when I was the system admin for a local dial-up ISP (dialup???) I retained our radius logs for 72 hours. After that they were rotated out of existence and I'd honestly have no way of telling you who was using what dialup IP at what time.

      In a dire situation relating to an actual crime and not a civil matter I would have happily turned my hard drive over to the FBI and let them have a go at recovering the deleted files. But for RIAA? Pfffft. Not a chance in hell. If I was still in this business today I'd probably store my logfiles on a ramdisk and keep the same 72 hour rotation. That's enough time for law enforcement in a legal situation (bomb threats against the local school were the favorite back in the day) but I doubt that RIAA moves that fast.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    19. Re:Perhaps by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT THE RIAA.

      THEY ARE THE 'MAJOR' RECORD COMPANIES.


      Um, and the RIAA is composed of the major record companies. Same thing. This is like complaining someone said "congress passed a bill" when they should have said "congressmen passed a bill". It's a distinction without a difference.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Perhaps by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      What he was saying, though, is that this isn't some nebulous group doing bad things on its own volition. Rather than RIAA, we should just say "the major record companies" since that's who we all know we're talking about. The distinction is that it reminds everyone of exactly who we should be angry with, regardless of what they might decide to change their front organization's name to in the future.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    21. Re:Perhaps by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      At least the TV Networks are readily flirting with putting shows up on the web for viewing by consumers at no cost (as long as you don't mind and ad every 15 minutes... snack break anyone?)
      I watched a couple episodes from ABC last season. Their timed enforcement of streaming ad viewing was a joke. It took so long for the stream to shift gears and present the ad that the timer had run out and I could skip it anyway.

      Mind you, the machine I was watching it on was so slow I had to hold down the mouse button to get a watchable frame rate. Well, wedge it down, really. It took more processing time away from playback to check for all possible user events than to field one event continuously. I haven't been back with the new machine; the cable hasn't been flaking out as much lately, apart from all three cable boxes locking up simultaneously yesterday.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    22. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a distinction without a difference.

      But it's worth mentioning anyway.

      Do you hate the name "Sony Music" as much as you hate the name "RIAA"?

      If not, then the RIAA has successfully deflected your hate, which is exactly what they are supposed to do.

      Unfortunately, people tend to forget that they are supposed to hate seeing the name "Sony Music" on a CD label exactly as much as they would hate seeing the name "RIAA" on the label. It never hurts to remind them once again.

    23. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his points is that we focus on the RIAA in our thinking of this group and when we deal with record companies individually we don't transfer our outrage to them, thus letting them off the hook... exactly as is the whole point of having an RIAA.

    24. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are Anonymous, and we do not forgive. Our numbers are legion. Those who perform reckless actions or wish to harm the Anonymous will be eliminated without hesitation. We are Anonymous, and we do not forgive.

    25. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (And their number is legion)

      Rockstar Games

      wtf? guess it's time to stop buying and start pirating them too.
  5. uncle sam (will) say so by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The spokesperson for the University also notes that since they constantly rotate IP addresses and have no need to hang onto that information for very long, they simply cannot help the RIAA.

    Coming soon, federal legislation giving the University a need to hang onto that information.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by realmolo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are trying to do just that:

      http://news.com.com/FBI+director+wants+ISPs+to+tra ck+users/2100-7348_3-6126877.html

      It'll probably never happen. But ONLY because it's completely impractical from a technical standpoint.

      Also, if you've never heard of CALEA, do a search. ISPs are already (as of this month) required to help law-enforcement spy on users. At great expense and hassle.

    2. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by daveschroeder · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I love how paranoid speculation like this is always marked "Insightful".

      How about this: what if such "federal legislation" is, in fact, not "coming soon"?

    3. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh, CALEA mandates technical mechanisms for providing information to law enforcement when required by a court order, so that things like wiretaps of VoIP phones or intercepting electronic communications can, you know, actually be done when necessitated by a court order.

      It was also passed in 1994 (i.e., not under Bush), and isn't new (though the deadline for compliance is May 2007).

    4. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by User+956 · · Score: 1

      I love how paranoid speculation like this is always marked "Insightful". How about this: what if such "federal legislation" is, in fact, not "coming soon"?

      You seem to be having trouble understanding the post. Here, let me help you out.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    5. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by BlueTrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what if such "federal legislation" is, in fact, not "coming soon"?

      Answer: You won't get marked as insightful then :)

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    6. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A lot must have changed in the last ten years. It looked to me that [machine named after a Peanuts character](*) kept track of DHCP leases for years, recording who got what IP and what their machine's MAC address was. I was once tasked to audit the information for two semesters to update the DHCP server for the next year. Students who were caught trying to get an unassigned static IP got their MAC addresses banned. They've caught students buying new NICs to get new, unbanned MAC addresses to get back on the network before.

      Meanwhile, the assignment of static IPs by DHCP must have also gone by the wayside, as when I was in the "residence halls" I was disturbed to discover that the IP addresses also had domain names identifying residence hall and room number and no option to have that information be removed.

      I guess that with the addition of wireless access on campus, there was suddenly far more information than they could handle and felt there was no longer any point in tracking it beyond, what are they saying, 31 days?

      (*) I'm pretty sure I know which machine, but there's no point in saying it here as it is inaccessible from off campus. I was there when they disallowed pings and traceroutes from the outside for reasons of network security, and that still appears to be the case. There's more than one Peanuts-named machine on campus.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Heh, "impractical" never stopped them before. It just gives cause to raise taxes.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by steelfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's also a huge difference between being asked to provide assistance, and being asked to keep and maintain records. Schools and ISP's can provide all the assistance law enforcement wants, but if they don't have a log of all the traffic in their network, that assistance would amount to nothing of consequence for retroactive investigations.

      Besides, the telecos would not like laws requiring keeping and maintaining traffic logs, and probably would lobby against them. After all, they'd shoulder the burden of the costs, and even more so, if anything should happen to those logs (fire, failed back-ups, etc.) they'd be the responsible party. Now, they let the government set up spy stations mostly because they wouldn't be responsible for the spying or the data collected, and it doesn't cost terribly much.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    9. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by waif69 · · Score: 1

      Since when has Congress or any legislative body ever concerned itself with viability? It's not like they are comprised of technical people, nor are they willing to give up a bad idea when they have agreed with it. Just follow the $$$, the RIAA puts money in the D/RNC treasuries and the politicos vote they way they are told. Very few vote the way their constituents want, at least not until elections loom near.

    10. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CALEA mandates technical mechanisms for providing information to law enforcement when required by a court order


      Wasn't there a slashdot article a few days ago about the FBI retrieving information from phone companies and conveniently "forgetting" to actually issue warrants? Comparing ISP's and phone companies is sort of comparing apples to oranges, but I think I'll go out on a limb here (with my tinfoil hat) and ponder how many "court orders" will be bypassed.

      Call my cynical.

      (Offtopic, I know; my apologies)
    11. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying the RIAA is a law enforcement entity?

    12. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dumbass. The response is talking about CALEA, not the RIAA. See the parent.

    13. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by DeekGeek · · Score: 1

      Actually, CALEA also provides the means for the telcos to charge the costs back to the LEAs.

      --

      How can the eyes be the Windows of the soul when they never blue screen?

    14. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without getting into if CALEA is applicable in the RIAA versus the world scenario; there has actually been a good bit of debate concerning how/if it applies to networks provided by universities.

      It would appear that Uncle Sam has more or less said, "it depends". For more details see the following:

      http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/050106-calea .html

      http://www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section=HENA &Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=17276

      http://connect.educause.edu/blog/lgesner/calea_upd ate_higher_ed_reporting_due_dates_announced/16659

    15. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've caught students buying new NICs to get new, unbanned MAC addresses to get back on the network before.

      Your students aren't very bright. You can change the MAC address of an ethernet card very easily.

    16. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll probably never happen. But ONLY because it's completely impractical from a technical standpoint.

      Impractical? Hardly.

      Most schools have some method for handing out IP addresses, usually DHCP. Every dhcp server can generate logs.

      Further, many (most?) schools have some kind of web-based authorization scheme so that when a student shows up with a new computer, they can prove they are authorized campus users by entering their studentID/password without bothering the IT people. I'm sure they generate logs too.

      Now, they might not want to bother keeping logs, but it is not impractical.

    17. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Your students aren't very bright. You can change the MAC address of an ethernet card very easily.

      Yes, this was a source of amusement for those catching them doing it.

      But then I did encounter the unlikely MAC address 00:00:00:00:10:00 in those logs too.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    18. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right.. But if the RIAA is demanding the information and they are not a law enforcement official what right do they have to the information... Jackass.

    19. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't the point of this thread. This story, yes, but in this thread, someone was saying "this is what CALEA does and if you don't believe me do a search", and no, it in fact doesn't do that. It does exactly what the respondent said, namely, ensures the information is available to law enforcement. Not the RIAA. Ergo, the person saying that CALEA is somehow scary or relevant here (to the RIAA demanding IPs) is wrong.

    20. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "Offtopic"? Was it not clear I was relating my experience working at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln? I worked in 29 WSEC. I still have my Faculty-Staff ID.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    21. Re:uncle sam (will) say so by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      They think they are.

      --
      What?
  6. MAFIAA gets a beating by mrbcs · · Score: 1

    Nice to see the MAFIAA taking a beating in three stories today. Maybe the tide can finally turn and this bullshit will all end.

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  7. Gnat on an elephant's back by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I applaud the move, Nebraska is but a minor annoyance to the deep pockets of the RIAA. For this to have the fullest effect, a large proportion of the colleges/universities in the country would have to band together and make a class-action case of it, IMHO. Individual schools can score points, but they won't score a clean enough victory to stop this nonsense.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by e4g4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, and let's not forget that for every University of Nebraska, there's a Penn State with draconian AUPs that require MAC addresses be associated with a particular student before being granted internet access, thus greatly simplifying the process of associating an IP address with a particular student.

      So, yeah, while this move by U of N is a good one, it's hard to say how significant it's impact will be in the grand scheme of things.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by TMarvelous · · Score: 1

      One university no matter how large may not be able to thwart the dep pockets of the RIAA directly, but there is a huge PR battle being fought here. The RIAA itself says it uses these lawsuits against individuals to scare off potential "violators" which is a PR tactic. One lawsuit isn't enough to stop file-sharing but it may scare off a lot of other file sharers.

      In the same fashion University of Nebrasking suing the RIAA won't stop them but it will put other individuals and institutions on notice that they don't have to bend over and take it from the RIAA.

      No matter how deep the RIAA pockets are - there is no money they can spend to prevent that from happening.

      --
      http://www.worldsoccerbars.com
    3. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and let's not forget that for every University of Nebraska, there's a Penn State with draconian AUPs that require MAC addresses be associated with a particular student before being granted internet access, thus greatly simplifying the process of associating an IP address with a particular student.
      Funny. Last I worked for UNL's Information Services department (formerly Computing Resource Center), that was their policy.

      Of course, that was ten years ago. They may have replaced their DHCP software with something else that doesn't provide easily greppable logs anymore.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have gone to both Nebraska and Penn State as a student, and without a doubt Nebraska's network kicks a$$. I once went to a talk by an IT official at Nebraska and his view was that these kids are our future, as long as they aren't bringing the network to its knees, they won't ban them, and the university will expand and provide the bandwidth and openness necessary to foster any future development/innovation.

    5. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a manger of an IT department, locking a MAC address to a user isn't draconian at all. It assists greatly in preventing malicious users as well as infected devices (laptops, PDAs, anything else connecting to the network). If you don't like the policy, don't use the network.

    6. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it only takes a few more to join up. Perhaps a class action lawsuit?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Penn State with draconian AUPs that require MAC addresses

      And an MIT? Can you honestly tell me that MIT, in the People's Republic of Cambridge, home of the Free Software Movement, the Berkeley of the East Coast, has pro-RIAA network policies?

      MIT maps usernames to MAC addresses. However, the RIAA doesn't (and can't) see MAC addresses, only IP addresses, and in the time between noticing activity and sending a subpoena, the temporary logs are long gone. The purpose of tracking MAC addresses at MIT -- and presumably at Penn State -- is to be able to identify a user with a misconfigured or malicious network port and contact him/her after terminating the connection. It is most certainly NOT to create easily-subpoenable IP-to-person logs.

    8. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by bjorniac · · Score: 1

      True, but if you're at PSU, I can tell ya that it cuts both ways: Just find a computer on the university network (eg in the english dept. grad lounge) copy its MAC add. as your own and d/c it. Voila, you can connect to the network, and everyone will think you're a grad student in English if they come looking for you. Tried and tested got me around the max bandwidth quotas and all kinds of things :)

    9. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
      And MAC Addresses mean anything when you can spoof them, reset them, and hard set them??? I can set my MAC addy to rotate, undulate and habituate, but not my "dynamic" IP that is ISP given.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    10. Re:Gnat on an elephant's back by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      This is interesting. When I went to the main campus from '94-'98 they didn't have this. I'm going for a grad degree at their Great Valley campus now and can do wireless over VPN with no tie in.

      I have no idea how my experience ties into this, but just wanted to put it out there.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  8. U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by SeaDour · · Score: 0, Troll

    If they don't track IP addresses, what's to stop the students from trying to break into, say, the registar office's servers to alter their grades?

    1. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by mooglez · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously suggesting that that is the only thing preventing or keeping students from altering their grades?

    2. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by nutznboltz2003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      UNL's network is open on the student side. You can run servers, game servers, web cams, whatever the hell you want. The thing is though, if you get caught, and they can prove who you are, they toss your sorry butt to the wolves. The student side is much more open the the restricted faculty/staff/admin side. A student plugging their machine into that side is likely to get caught pretty quickly.

      I'm also pretty sure that the IP is kept longer then they admit. I have friends attending UNL and they have had the same IP all year. It did not even change when they went home for x-mas break. I think they have the ability to help the RIAA if they want, but with all the bad press, and Nebraska's need for recruiting out-of-state students, this is the perfect publicity stunt. "Come to Nebraska and leech without fear of being turned in".

      Overall, I think they are no more a haven for hackers than any other large University. Most seem to have the attitude of "do what you want, but don't get caught".

    3. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      They said they don't keep the IP logs for very long, not they don't keep logs at all.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by beef623 · · Score: 1

      If they did track the IP, all they would get would be the machine where the attack came from which wouldn't really be all that helpful at a university anyway. They probably keep track of the username.

    5. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by markbt73 · · Score: 1

      "I've got it right here, Mrs. Bueller! he has been absent nine times."

      --
      "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
    6. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      "altering" != "trying to alter". Of course they probably won't be able to alter them, but it would of course be useful to know who's trying, since that's probably punishable as well.

    7. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking those student IP blocks from accessing any such servers altogether?

      Trust me, hiding your IP would be the easiest part of breaking into a major university's student information system. It'd be much simpler too, to purge any logs of who had what IP when, than it would be to clear up the audit trail on the SIS system.

    8. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      If they don't track IP addresses, what's to stop the students from trying to break into, say, the registar office's servers to alter their grades?


      Presumably, the same security that prevents people from breaking into those servers that aren't originating on the U of Nebraska student network.

    9. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I would say nothing. But if a student is good enough to hack into the registrar's office servers, they are good enough to cover their tracks.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    10. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QFT

    11. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by Kandenshi · · Score: 1

      They do keep the IPs, just not for months and months.

      So if someone's trying to get into the registrar's records, they could be detected and possibly tracked down. They'd presumably start investigating that fairly soon after the incident, not wait for 31+ days for the records to get erased.

    12. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by Socguy · · Score: 1

      I believe that the article says that they keep records for one month. Enough time? I don't know, but it must be for them. In any regard, I doubt they tell students about this policy.

    13. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by wyztix · · Score: 1

      Keeping the same IP doesn't mean they keep record of who had that IP. Afaik, when using DHCP, you're assigned with a timed lease. When that lease end and you're not connected, then the address is released and when you'll log back, your system may ask for the old address. If it's still unassigned, the server will give it back to you, but if it was assigned meanwhile, you'll get a new one. That's why you can keep the same addresse for a year.
      See chapter 3.2 of DHCP RFC for more info.

    14. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      If they don't track IP addresses, what's to stop the students from trying to break into, say, the registar office's servers to alter their grades?

      Presumably UNL's network department can request logs much more quickly than the RIAA's legal department can. And if the logs are as a matter of policy destroyed if they're a few days old....

    15. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by nutznboltz2003 · · Score: 1

      Very true, and you are correct. The thing is though, most of the time, the machine is still on when the lease expires, and it will just auto-request the same IP if it is available. Knowing this, they could at least make a half-hearted attempt, but I'm still proud of what they are doing. One of the few pieces of good news to come from the corn-husker state.

      Also, in regards to the student side being "less restricted", what I meant, was that students have more options for what they can run/use, not how much bandwidth they have access too. For instance, Faculty/Staff are smacked down for running limewire, while students have free reign.

    16. Re:U of Nebraska = Haven for Hackers? by JoelOl75 · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget the fact that Ethernet technology has absolutely NO security. Whats to stop someone from using raw sockets to plant themselves in the middle of someone else's connection, or writing their own MAC address. Trivial, unless you use XP SP2 which raw sockets were removed for your protection... But of course we all use Linux here ;) Ethernet, No authentication, no security per say at this level 2 protocol. ARP poisoning is trivial to do.... Also a GREAT defense to use if you end up being one of the students in the law suit.... Or to protect yourself from a law suit, use someone elses connection....... That's probably why grandma is getting sued for d/l Metallica. Please... I can't even believe how many of my neighbors have WIDE open wireless internet with default passwords on their gateways. Of course I change the password for them, as a system that works with their laptop will probably not get messed with and I get to use their internet. If someone else gets in their router they would probably trash the settings then of course they will WEP/WPA it... Something really scares the hell out of the non-tech savvy to take an ink pin and jam it in the back of the router just because they "forgot" the password....

  9. Holy shit !!! This is becoming more fun day by day by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Such good things happening lately are cheering me up in the middle of a workday when i come to slashdot at chillout breaks.

  10. I hope Nebraska Wins by CF4L · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then maybe they will set a precedent such that I can sue coworkers who invite me to meetings as "required" that I don't have any reason to be at. That will make them thing twice when creating the invitee list.

  11. What's going to happen by br0d · · Score: 3, Interesting

    is that the RIAA is going to start suing schools. And that is when I pop the popcorn.

  12. RIAA never heard of dynamic addressing, heh by swschrad · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised they ever picked up on this Internet thingy.

    bunch 'a' dinosaurs.

    dismiss it all with prejudice and stick RIAA with the costs. serves 'em right.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:RIAA never heard of dynamic addressing, heh by topical_surfactant · · Score: 1

      DHCP is a fad. Just like snap bracelets and banana seats.

  13. What I wrote in their support by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's the letter I wrote to the president of UNL, the chancellor, each of the regents, and the CIO (Mr. Weir):

    College is the time for many children to grow into adults by learning to make their own decicions, often for the first time in their lives. Access to information about those decisions is important, and the ability to get it anonymously is critical. No boy wants his friends to know that he was contemplating suicide. No girls wants to be seen asking about sexually transmitted diseases. Unless they know that their questions can't be tracked back to them, most kids won't ask them.

    Walter Weir's IT policies contribute to the atmosphere of open learning that a university, of all places, should strive to attain. Now, some group from Hollywood wants UNL to overhaul its computer network for the explicit purpose of destroying that, simply to serve ends that the school has no real reason to care about. As a computer scientist and a Nebraska taxpayer, I have these additional problems with their request:

    1) I am not interested in seeing my money used to persecute kids for trading songs, much as you and I traded tapes with our friends when we were younger.

    2) IP addresses are traceable to computers, not people. If two or more kids share a computer, who gets the cease-and-desist notice? The RIAA has a history of doing asinine things like suing dead grandmothers; yes, that really happened. I'd much rather see UNL say that their requests can't be answered than to get involved in such foolish and expensive unpleasantry.

    3) Again, the current system works and I see no reason to change it to benefit one outside group with dubious interests. Computer networks are hard to build, and harder to build well. Mr. Weir's department has done a fine job and he should not be made to enact its destruction.

    Just say no to the RIAA. We have a system that serves us - the citizens, taxpayers, and students of Nebraska - very well. UNL's network is meant for the education and personal growth of its users. It is not meant to be the unpaid police force for an outside party with no concern for our needs.

    I got several replies of agreement, and I think that the school will be holding its ground.

    GO HUSKERS!

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:What I wrote in their support by swid27 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well said. You should send that along to the Lincoln Journal Star , the Omaha World-Herald and the Daily Nebraskan .

      Hey Slashdot! Want to have fun? Read (and reply to) some of the comments in the Journal Star articles about UNL and the RIAA (available here and here.)

    2. Re:What I wrote in their support by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Who justified piracy? I don't advocate it, but I don't think college kids need to be bankrupted because they gave an MP3 to a friend. Furthermore, you seemed to miss the part about having received replies. I don't usually bother replying to emails that I'm just going to delete, but maybe that's just me.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:What I wrote in their support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty good.
      Next time try not to make any spelling errors in the opening sentence of a letter.

    4. Re:What I wrote in their support by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Next time try not to make any spelling errors in the opening sentence of a letter.

      I'm a planning type. Implementation details like that are for the junior programmers.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:What I wrote in their support by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Nice letter. Now if you guys didn't steal Penn State's football championship in '94, I'd give you an 'atta boy. :)

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:What I wrote in their support by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I think the last few seasons have been karmic payback for anything we might have done wrong in the past.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:What I wrote in their support by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Except for last year, we haven't been doing much better :(

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  14. Go Cornhuskers, Go Big Red! by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think y'all oughta introduce some of those mafiaa lawyers to your livestock ... "squeal like a pig".

  15. who are you rooting for? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Insightful

    your cynicism belies a lack of heart. even if your cynical jibe were actually true, it would be a call to arms against our representatives about whose interest they are serving in washington. not a call for snide sarcastic comments that, in the end, betrays the fact that you accept your fate as a citizen in a corporatocracy

    is it right the riaa can give away money and create legislation that screws the citizens of a country? of course not. does it happen all of the time, corporate interests trumping the interest of the citzenry? of course. but i say that people like you, who just comment on that reality cynically, are part of the problem.

    because in your cynicism is acceptance

    wrong: you should be angry, not cynical

    so i ask again: who are you rooting for? the riaa? if not, then drop the retarded cynicism, please

    sarcasm and cynicism are the hallmark of the weak mind, not the intelligent mind, contrary to popular belief

    cynics need to shut the fuck up, and grow a heart, cynicism != intelligence, as many of you think you are showcasing when you say something sarcastic. you are simply showcasing your own weak will

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:who are you rooting for? by User+956 · · Score: 1

      but i say that people like you, who just comment on that reality cynically, are part of the problem. because in your cynicism is acceptance

      And I say that people who cannot accept how a system functions, have no hope of making steps to make it work to their own benefit.

      Is it really better to deny reality, because that reality reflects the naked ugliness of the corporate person (and by extension, human nature as a whole)?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:who are you rooting for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so I become angry. So what? Perhaps I should write a strongly worded (and ANGRY!) letter to my representative? Nope, I'm just supposed to "shut the fuck up". But at least I've grown a heart. And become angry.

      How does this help again?

    3. Re:who are you rooting for? by romland · · Score: 1

      sarcasm and cynicism are the hallmark of the weak mind, not the intelligent mind, contrary to popular belief [citation needed]

    4. Re:who are you rooting for? by Tiro · · Score: 1
      please, chill out. why do you need to be so blunt.

      His comment is at least insightful, and possibly true. I don't see why you have to pretend like you know what his mental state is.

    5. Re:who are you rooting for? by EonBlueTooL · · Score: 1

      "cynics need to shut the fuck up, and grow a heart, cynicism != intelligence, as many of you think you are showcasing when you say something sarcastic. you are simply showcasing your own weak will"

      Your decorative langauge and poor grammar could also be a sign of "unintelligence." But now that the ad hominem is done, intelligence has nothing to do with grammar or decorative language or vocabulary or a persons cynical nature. (or's for emphasis not for correctness)

      I could further go your direction and say that anger makes you blind and reckless. Examples "sarcasm and cynicism are the hallmark of the weak mind, not the intelligent mind, contrary to popular belief" may be a truth that you hold to be self evident but it is not. Cynicism and intelligence are not mutually excluseive (or mutually inclusive).

      If you want to prove your superiority of will and intelligence why don't you provide us with a course of action, the troops have been armed a long time ago, now we want something to do. Being that we see nothing but defeat without vision or no course of action we decide to entertain ourselves with the sarcastic humor and cynicism that it so easily breeds.

    6. Re:who are you rooting for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are a tool. You know that, right? Of course you do. I'm sure you get it all the time.

      You're that kid in high school who wears the Tux shirt and goes on and on about how the government is out to get us all and how corporations are running our lives. Slashdot incarnate.

      Listen, douchebag. The world is a lot bigger than your narrow little sheep viewpoint. Open your eyes and see that things aren't as fucking straightforward as your feeble mind thinks they are.

  16. Go Huskers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I applaud the University of Nebraska in this move and hope that its student body continue to steal "music" to their hearts content.

    Lets be realistic here. The music industry cannot die fast enough, for all our sakes. No decent music has been composed since Shostakovich died. All this "Rock" and "Roll" and "Hip-Hopping" is nothing more than the flatulence of Neanderthals, composed and performed only to facilitate delinquency, substance abuse, and sexual deviance.

    Only when the last "hepcat" has been strangled with the strings of the last electric guitar, the last "Em See" has been beaten to death with the last iPod, and the pestilence of the "music biz" is for all time done away with, only then will human culture be able to move forward to authentic new acheivements in the field of musical composition.

    So download all you want, University of Nebraska students, you can't "kill music" fast enough, for all our sakes.

  17. fuck the RIAA by ttnuagmada · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if the RIAA didnt force absolute fucking garbage down our throats through the likes of networks like Clear Channel, they might have better CD sales. In the last few years it seems to me like the RIAA is trying to make the absolute worst fucking music it could possibly ever make just because they know 16 year old girls will buy anything they think is supposed to be popular. the bottom line is that they arent selling the CD's they used to sell because popular modern music from every single genre is studio manufactured dogshit with no originality or artistic merit whatsoever, and as stupid and lame and tasteless as the average person might be they all arent THAT stupid.

    1. Re:fuck the RIAA by teflaime · · Score: 1

      Ummm...the RIAA has absolutely nothing to do with the creation and distribution. They merely sue people on behalf of those who do....

    2. Re:fuck the RIAA by geoffspear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "This music is so horrible that I refuse to pay for it. But I will download it and listen to it for hours."

      Right. Is it just me who's not such a moron that I don't listen to music I hate whether I have to pay for it or not?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:fuck the RIAA by ttnuagmada · · Score: 1

      who said anything about listening to it? There are, have been, and always will be people who pirate music. I'm not agreeing with it im just trying to point out that the recording industry is taking out their lack of sales on these people rather than owning up to the fact that they fucking suck at having anything to do with good music.

    4. Re:fuck the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The major labels actually have an economic incentive to produce bad music. Don't believe me? Consider this:

      The majority of independent labels in the US are really just "farm-teams" for the majors, recieving funding and resources in return for artist development. Small artists with nothing to show, and little power to negotiate, are often forced into 5 album deals with a small label. This wouldn't be so bad except for the fact that any "independent" funded by a major must include in its contracts an "upstreaming" clause. This allows the major label to acquire the artist the second they appear to become successful, but without a chance for the artist to renegotiate.

      This is how multi-million dollar acts end up making literally nothing. I know specifically of a band from my area who after 2 albums with singles on mtv2, and accompanying international tours, are living together in one apartment and working construction in their down time.

      The major labels have figured out that it literally does not pay to find the next Bob Dylan, they'd have to pay him to damn much. Until something significant changes, we will probably never see another Led Zeppelin or another U2.

      The only truly succesful acts are the ones that have figured this out, and in some senses turned to the darkside. Jay-Z is extremely succesful, but as a record-label executive (CEO of Def Jam and Roc-A-Fella). It makes me chuckle to see that wikipedia calls him "one of the most financially successful American hip-hop artists." What is it that's always said on slashdot? Correlation does not imply causation.

  18. They should play their strong hand by humphrm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The RIAA so far has been playing the "We've got deeper pockets and more lawyers than you" card.

    Schools should play the "We've got law students galore, just itching for something to work on" card.

    --
    -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    1. Re:They should play their strong hand by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      The law professors wouldn't want to risk their careers and personal lives on it. If the RIAA can afford to mount these kinds of campaigns they could probably afford a few smear campaigns to keep the academics in check--nobody knows how to create a smear campaign like attorneys (or insurance brokers) do.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    2. Re:They should play their strong hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree it's a stupid idea to send STUDENTS, who may or may not be interested in the tech. world's little Holy War, to fight the RIAA, the power of tenure should not be underestimated either.

    3. Re:They should play their strong hand by wyztix · · Score: 1

      Schools should play the "We've got law students galore, just itching for something to work on" card.
      Make that a lay student project or something like that and you'll get plenty of cheap lawyers. So cheap they actually pay you!
  19. You go Farmboys !!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Heaploads of love and support for ya from other end of the world, Turkey.

  20. FUCK YOU SEVEN ELEVEN! by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If they'd stock SNACKS I LIKE, maybe i wouldn't shoplift so much.

    Why should I have to pay for a whole fruit pie when I ONLY LIKE THE FILLING! I'd rather support small local indie pie makers than just give my money to THE HOSTESS CORPORATION.

    Fuck those guys man! The 7-11 mafiaa is going down.

    IM JUST LIKE GAHNDI.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:FUCK YOU SEVEN ELEVEN! by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative

      Repeat after me, copyright infringement is not theft.

    2. Re:FUCK YOU SEVEN ELEVEN! by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Repeat after me..

      Sucking the filling out of hostess fruit pies at seven eleven and then putting them back is not theft.

      It'd vandalism.

      Semantics are fun.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:FUCK YOU SEVEN ELEVEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So does that mean you think the difference between petty theft and copyright infringement is only semantic?

      If so, does that mean you think the penalty for copyright infringement should be the same as petty theft?

      Because if so, I agree. Hell with this hundreds of dollars per song crap.

    4. Re:FUCK YOU SEVEN ELEVEN! by Nos. · · Score: 1

      No, that is theft. You have taken property from another without permission. It might also be vandalism, but its still definitely theft.

    5. Re:FUCK YOU SEVEN ELEVEN! by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      Let's see:

      Two words: Copy, Theft.

      Coping is defined as creating a new 'thing' which is identical, or nearly so, to an already existent 'thing.'

      Theft is defined as the unauthorized procurement of the already existent 'thing' itself.

      STB

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  21. They need a better data retention policy by vinn01 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    If they really want to make the RIAA go away, they need a better data retention policy.

    A month is way to too to keep IP address (I assume DHCP) records.

    At an ISP where I used to work, we kept RADIUS ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RADIUS ) logs far too long too. I think it was realized that a data retention policy was needed when the RIAA started sending their lawyer letters (that was back in 2001).

    In most cases, the logs are only need for a few hours. In rare cases maybe a day or two. Longer than that, the only reasons are not related to network or system administration. If your security is so poor that you need IP address logs from a month ago to see who was on what server, you have serious security problems.

    If I ran an ISP (or a university network), I would retain the logs for one day. And maybe I would not retain full logs at all, for any length of time, if they became a liability.

    1. Re:They need a better data retention policy by Bandman · · Score: 1

      You would still need to keep some sort of accounting, in order to plan according to usage cycles and such, but yea, it need not have identifiable information.

  22. All Universities Should Stop Keeping Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Universities should stop keeping records of IP addresses... if the RIAA wants the records, there won't be any!

  23. Creating a Fearful Consumer Class by asphaltjesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. The RIAA is the entertainment conglomerates "bad cop."
    2. The point is to make consumers deathly afraid of doing anything with digital media without checking for their approval. This makes DRM look like a great solution if you are a consumer afraid of being sued.

    "Stick it to them" and haha posts may make /.'ers feel better, but don't take the entertainment conglomerates head-on. The entertainment conglomerates are quite happy about that by the way because /.'er's are a bunch of copyright criminals in an online echo-chamber with their crazy ideas about "free media."

    How about organizing an annual no-drm day? Don't by any DRM'd media on that one day each year. That's right no DVD's, no iTunes.

    Oh, wait that means we would have to DO something though. Nevermind.

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Creating a Fearful Consumer Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's plenty of people here who don't use iTunes at all, or who don't have DRM-riddled DVD movies. I do my part, I pirate what I don't think is worth $20 (music CDs, $1 per iTunes song...). I guess I do actually buy a lot of my video games, but only the ones that I feel have really earned it (of course, a completely arbitrary judgment on my part, but it's my choice). I also pirate plenty of games that I know I'll only be enjoying for a day before getting tired of them (Oblivion lols).

      I agree that the majority of the population probably won't be willing to sacrifice their delicious DRM-media, but to be honest, it's so easy nowadays for even internet-newbies to pirate music and movies that I think the biggest barrier to doing so right now is probably the fact that the mafiaa has resorted to their little scare tactics. P2Ps still work, and are still pretty damn popular.

    2. Re:Creating a Fearful Consumer Class by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 4, Informative

      I feel obligated to point out that plenty of us ARE doing things, even while we laugh at the RIAA's losses. Simply because you aren't, and/or you know no one else doing such, does not mean its not happening. Would you rather I post my actions to against the RIAA every story? Thats absurd, but fine, here: I've not purchased a DVD or anything from iTunes ever. I've been boycotting DRM before it was cool. The last essay I wrote for my English class was entitled "DRM: Slowly Taking Our Rights." When I recommend VLC to a not-so-savy computer user, I always follow it with a warning about how in both the United States and France its not completely legal to use it to play DVD's. Complaining about lack of action (specifically in a manner which will not encourage others to action), is it itself no better than doing nothing at all. How about you start a no-drm day? Make a website and get it on /., digg, etc. Don't assume no one else is taking any action; we are.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    3. Re:Creating a Fearful Consumer Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I recommend VLC to a not-so-savy computer user, I always follow it with a warning about how in both the United States and France its not completely legal to use it to play DVD's.

      Hmm, didn't know that. I actually suggested to a lawyer that he use it when showing a video in federal court...

    4. Re:Creating a Fearful Consumer Class by jkiol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everyday is no DRM day for some of us ;)

  24. well, you could check out NU's use guidelines by swschrad · · Score: 1

    they flatly say in the 2001 document that they are a carrier, and students had better assume that they are visible and not protected if they hink around the law or educational propriety.

    sounds like my alma mater has nicely insulated themselves and told everybody just how the cow eats the cabbage (and wrecks two crops in the process.)

    I'd say that it's time to play The Rouser, folks, another touchdown for good ol' Nebraska U!

    http://www.nebraska.edu/about/exec_memo16.pdf

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  25. mod -2 by jhesse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The student side is much more open the the restricted faculty/staff/admin side.
    -1: use of "the the"
    -1: "faculty/staff/admin" side is unrestricted. (Students have 'soft limits' on per-day bandwidth)

    --

    --
    "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
  26. Surprised This Is News by MikeyTheK · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a little surprised this is news. Generally speaking third parties are entitled to be compensated for their costs of complying with subpoenas in civil cases. Normally the receiving parties notify the issuer of the subpoena what the reasonable and necessary costs are of complying with the subpoena, and generally demand payment up front. I don't know why this is any different.

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
    1. Re:Surprised This Is News by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking third parties are entitled to be compensated for their costs of complying with subpoenas in civil cases. ... I don't know why this is any different.
      According to TFA: "The industry has sent more than 1,000 "cease and desist" complaints to UNL during the current school year"

      So it is different because the RIAA letters are not subpoenas in civil cases.

      Many Uni's have set up 'compliance' programs & hired people full-time to 'comply' with RIAA requests. With that in mind, I think it is entirely reasonable for UNL to ask for compensation.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Surprised This Is News by Zakko · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a difference here, as noted. However, the letters asking to forward the notices to the students included a request to preserve information should associated lawsuits (with discovery court orders) follow. In general, UNL complies with reasonable requests (usually from law enforcement who sometimes have delays in getting court orders signed) to retain this type of information, but generally the officer requesting the information even asks if there are any significant costs involved. The other side of this is that the University may be treating this as a Public Records Request, which in Nebraska also allows for reimbursement, including an up-front deposit if the amount is significant. This could be an interesting lawyer battle.

    3. Re:Surprised This Is News by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The fucktards over at the RIAA would be better off to buy a 1/4 page ad in the college news paper and maybe donate some money to sponsor event in exchange for banner space and other general goodwill repair activity.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  27. The Free Ride is Over by sehlat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The RIAA has, until fairly recently, gotten pretty much a free ride for two reasons:

    1. They've been suing "little people" who frequently cannot even afford a lawyer and for whom even ONE loss in court would wipe them out financially.

    2. A court system in which computer-clueless judges have taken the RIAA's word that their "evidence" is valid and who have forgotten or overlooked the "innocent until PROVEN guilty" which is the basis of our entire legal system.

    Now they're starting to wade in against people and institutions who DO have lawyers and aren't afraid to use them and who CAN carry on the "protracted struggle" the modern over-lawyered legal system demands. In the meantime, judges are getting more educated about what computers can and can't do, and are being reminded of the presumption of innocence.

    So instead of "show me the money", of which the RIAA has plenty, they're about to hear "show me the evidence", of which they have little or none.

    Game, set, and match!

    1. Re:The Free Ride is Over by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      This is why I sometimes really hate slashdot. You get people saying things like '"innocent until PROVEN guilty" which is the basis of our entire legal system.' and getting modded to +5.

      It seems too many moderators mod up what they want to hear, whether it is true or not.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  28. A Modest Proposal by geoff+lane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of the current icons used for stories about RIAA let's use parody versions of the music company logos. It's only fair that the real villains get the credit they deserve.

  29. well now by spaxxor · · Score: 1

    It looks like the RIAA will have to think about it next time they sniff the slightest little tidbit of music piracy, I feel compelled to say that their just protecting their investments, but there's a line between protection, and fanaticism.

    --
    destiny, chance, fate, fortune; they're all ways of claiming your fortunes, without claiming your failures. -gerrard
    1. Re:well now by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      but there's a line between protection, and fanaticism.

      There's a line between protection and racketeering, and I think they crossed it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  30. constantly rotate IP addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every isp should have this

  31. Fantastic Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could potentially become more profitable for big colleges than football teams. Plus, they can sell students' web usage info to marketing companies for even more cash.

    ---
    Is your country:
    a) Democratic
    b) Fascist
    c) Plutocratic

  32. Reasons for RIAA not to sue Universities by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. People know the actual terms of licenses and what Fair Use is.

    2. Many many lawyers and soon-to-be lawyers looking forward to massive p0wnage of RIAA that will give them credit and make a name for them in future work in the law are studying at the universities.

    3. Many faculty lawyers looking to publish papers to prove how good they are at p0wning RIAA - publish or perish!

    4. Lots of grads willing to donate money to their alum funds to help p0wn RIAA.

    5. It's just plain FUN!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Reasons for RIAA not to sue Universities by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      You really don't want to sue students unless you're absolutely certain you will win. They can't afford to settle. They can afford the time to represent themselves, and they're smart enough to learn the law. And if you win, you're not going to get a lot from them because they don't have enough money.

    2. Re:Reasons for RIAA not to sue Universities by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      ah, but that's the economic argument.

      Look at the ROI and ROE for suing students - they have no assets, major debt, and can easily declare bankruptcy. They also know the economic argument that the probability of being successfully sued is something like 0.00000001 percent per person. Heck, they have more chance of catching HIV from a mosquito ...

      They also have no incentives to comply either.

      After all, since the record labels only pay bands 1 or 2 cents of the $15 for a CD or DVD, it's better to buy the CDs from the band at a performance, or get their t-shirt, and rip the music over the Internet's tubes while the music industry parasites scream in vain.

      Yup. The only reason RIAA thinks it should sue them is they're afraid that anyone born after 1980 will just stop buying music from them - and buy it directly from the band itself.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Ironic by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked at UNL for a few years, and this strikes me as ironic.

    Until somtime in the first half of the decade, UNL used to give everyone real static IP addresses. This let students easily host their own servers, including one server that, rumor had it, had one of the biggest collections of pirated music on the Internet - the server was pre-Napster and survived and thrived post-Napster. (Rumor said it was run by a woman who just loved music and liked to listen to everything that was uploaded... I'm not sure if she went to class much because they said she was in her 6th year or so when I was there.)

      This was before the RIAA was very active online, and to my understanding was fairly unaware of servers like this. When UNL went to DHCP everywhere, one of the effects was to make it harder to run servers like that. So, it's funny that a move that a few years ago was percieved as hurting music piracy is now seen as enabling it. (The move to DHCP wasn't done for political reasons, but the students didn't see it that way.)

    PS. I never visited the server and don't know who ran it, so don't bother subpoenaing me, RIAA. :p

    1. Re:Ironic by swid27 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Students still can (and do) have static IP addresses; now, however, you have to fill out a form to get one.

      The 2000-2001 academic year was a wonderful time to be a freshman at UNL. No network caps whatsoever.

    2. Re:Ironic by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Students still can (and do) have static IP addresses; now, however, you have to fill out a form to get one.

      Fill that sucker out and there goes your plausible deniability.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Ironic by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      I remember this sort of thing happening too. I lived in Selleck back in 1998-1999 and any given time during the day you could pop open your network neighborhood and see at least a dozen other computers in the building with open file shares. It was great.

  34. IP Addresses by daub84 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know about everyone else, but the college I went to only had a few outside IP's. So, at any given time there were 100's of kids sharing outside ip's. How would RIAA expect a school to be able to track down which of those hundred had supposedly shared or downloaded illegal content?

    1. Re:IP Addresses by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everyone else, but the college I went to only had a few outside IP's. So, at any given time there were 100's of kids sharing outside ip's. How would RIAA expect a school to be able to track down which of those hundred had supposedly shared or downloaded illegal content? Even if you're behind a NATing firewall, P2P software sends "I'm at IP a.b.c.d" during initialization so servers or other clients can try to reach it, e.g. if ports are opened on the firewall.
    2. Re:IP Addresses by Arrowmaster · · Score: 1

      Many universities were involved with the early development of the internet or were early adopters of it. As a result a good number of the ~120 class A subnets are owned by universities giving them up to 16,777,214 public IP addresses.

  35. What's up with the BlueRay Slashdot Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slashdot,

    Please, no BlueRay Ads. It is still a DRM format. Until the DRM is broken (and Sony doesn't jail people over fair use), I want no part
    of it.

    I changed my hosts file to point the associated advertisers to localhost.

    I don't mind adds. But I would rather not see ads that are offensive.

    Perhaps as part of you settings, you could describe classes of Ads that are counterproductive to show to me.

    1. Re:What's up with the BlueRay Slashdot Ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has ad's ?!?!?!

      smoothwall, dan's guardian, adzapper, firefox. need I say more?

    2. Re:What's up with the BlueRay Slashdot Ads. by partenon · · Score: 1

      Yes: http://slashdot.org/subscribe.pl . Then, "Subscription" and select "No ads" for Home Page, Stories and Comments.

      --
      ilex paraguariensis for all
    3. Re:What's up with the BlueRay Slashdot Ads. by Enlightenment · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding, I really didn't realize /. had ads. Of the content /. chooses to provide to me, I choose not to view it all. I have zero interest in Internet ads, because I am secure in the size of my member.

  36. Here in Nebraska by Spleen · · Score: 1

    When we hear this news...the state breaks out into the familiar "Go Big Red" chant that the HuskerNation is famous for.

    1. Re:Here in Nebraska by modi123 · · Score: 1

      no.. it is: Goooooooooooo biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig reeeeeeeeeed! go! big! red! sheesh..

    2. Re:Here in Nebraska by Spleen · · Score: 2, Funny

      ha! I apologize for not including the sheet music to accompany the lyrics.

  37. Clear Channel is a tool. by RingDev · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Clear Channel is a corporate entity, and it's RIAA backing and conservative morals can be flipped in a second if consumers push for it. In the Madison, WI market a clear channel station (92.1) picked up Air America/The Mic and a number of left wing talk shows. After 3 years, Clear Channel was about to pull the plug on it. As soon as word got out though, consumer pressure on the advertisers drove a number of advertisers to go to clear channel and threaten to pull their adds if the station format changed. The end result, we still have a left wing radio station in Madison.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Clear Channel is a tool. by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Clear Channel is a corporate entity, and it's RIAA backing and conservative morals can be flipped in a second if consumers push for it. In the Madison, WI market a clear channel station (92.1) picked up Air America/The Mic and a number of left wing talk shows. After 3 years, Clear Channel was about to pull the plug on it. As soon as word got out though, consumer pressure on the advertisers drove a number of advertisers to go to clear channel and threaten to pull their adds if the station format changed. The end result, we still have a left wing radio station in Madison.

      -Rick


      Huzzah! A major victory for both of Air Americas' listeners!

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  38. DRM by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    They should pay me for the time I've had to waste dealing with their DRM schemes, trying to listen to music on my MP3 player.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  39. Create more debt by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

    It just gives cause to raise taxes Create debt, maintain debt, keep people in debt, work them until they die of debt.
    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    1. Re:Create more debt by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      1) Create debt, maintain debt, keep people in debt, work them until they die of debt.
      2) Profit!!!
      3) ???
      Brilliant!

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    2. Re:Create more debt by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ants 'milking' aphids. Very common survival technique. Will never win against a lawn mover though.

      --
      What?
  40. Nebraska .. Nebraska .. by djtachyon · · Score: 1

    Never heard of it.. oh wait .. thats where all the coastline yuppies are moving to! Lets move there with whitey and damn the man!

    --
    "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
  41. mod -2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -2: Pretentious arrogant arsehole.

  42. it is better to deny reality, and fight it, if reality is wrong

    it is not superior to deny reality, and fight it, if reality is right

    but plenty of people have different ideas about what is right and wrong. and so results the conflicts we see every day in politics and society

    you need to accept... this reality ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:yes by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Gravity is part of reality. It is not right, it is not wrong, it just is.
      Trying to ignore or deny gravity is a good way to get hurt.

      Human nature is also part of reality.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  43. Finally! by Cygnostik · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see anyone taking a stab back at those bastards!

    1. Re:Finally! by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 3, Funny

      A stab in the back is OK, but seeing the RIAA cleaved asunder with a battle-ax would be an absolute hoot!

      STB

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  44. as long as you are angry and fighting by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i have no problem with you

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:as long as you are angry and fighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is too much anger and fighting in this world.

  45. Flawed model by Himring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a flawed model really. Historically, suing oneself into success has never worked. The wright (right?) brothers spent their last decades suing anyone who made anything that flew -- yea that went well. The maker of the gun carteridge -- who partenered/sold out to S&W -- did the same thing, and spent his entire fortune made on the invention in court, died broke.

    The RIAA missed the boat, failed to innovate, didn't see or care to see the j-curve in technology and are thrashing in the water trying to force people back to music listening circa 1990. The genie is out of the bottle. Pandora's box is open. You are not the next american idol. The answer was D. and now regis is waiting for you to leave the stage. Move along RIAA. Game over dude....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Flawed model by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      The wright (right?) brothers Personally, I always preferred the "Wight Brothers", but that's just my appreciation for Stephen Jackson and/or JRR Tolkein's work coming out.

    2. Re:Flawed model by vikinglief · · Score: 1

      :) Go down 2 levels if you can't beat them or fail the run away roll...

    3. Re:Flawed model by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bill Clinton was once asked, "Do you know of a single nation that has ever taxed and spent itself into prosperity?" He didn't have an answer. I suspect that if you asked Cary Sherman and the studio executive crowd "Do you know of a single major industry that has ever litigated itself into prosperity by suing its own customers?" that they wouldn't have an answer either. I exclude the legal profession from the short list of valid responses, since suing themselves into prosperity is their industry, and I also exclude the RIAA since they are lawyers.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Flawed model by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Do you know of a single nation that has ever taxed and spent itself into prosperity?

      Not off hand, but I can think of one that is just spending itself into ruin.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:Flawed model by Azathfeld · · Score: 1

      Bill Clinton was once asked, "Do you know of a single nation that has ever taxed and spent itself into prosperity?" No, he wasn't. Try Googling that phrase. Then, try Googling the end, beginning with "taxed". You're quoting Ken Blackwell, not some mythical question that flummoxed the Big Dog. You know you're blowing smoke when you say "Clinton didn't have an answer" for anything. There has never been a time that the man didn't have a slick response ready for anything posed to him. He questioned the definition of "is" without missing a beat; he's not stymied by random rhetorical queries.

    6. Re:Flawed model by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, he was. I watched it on television at the time, and I was more than a little amused. Clinton was indeed flustered, because those allowed to be present at those "Town Meetings" were very carefully screened for the proper political bias, but apparently a ringer got in. Clinton was blindsided.

      Here's the relevant portion:

      President Clinton, I believe that you were elected largely on the basis of your promise of a middle-class tax cut. But for the last 90 days or so, we've seen both you and the Congress transforming that promised middle-class tax cut into an unprecedented round of more taxes and new spending. Our county has been in a deepening recession for the last three years. There's no end in sight, and a malaise is beginning to set in our county, like the Carter era. Please understand, Mr. President, San Diegans just don't have any more money to contribute to the coffers of government.

      My question is, can you name one country that has ever taxed and spent itself back into prosperity? Thank you.

      THE PRESIDENT: The answer to your question is, I can't. But you can't fairly characterize my program as that.


      Clinton went on from there with an extended rendition of his accomplishments, but I trust you take my point. I'm not disagreeing with your evaluation of President Clinton's ability to dissemble, but he was indeed asked that question and he did not have an answer.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  46. but the problem is by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    sometimes you need a

    -1 no shit

    and sometimes you need a

    +1 no shit

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  47. Attacking Colleges is quite stupid by WaZiX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who will be the ones in charge in a few years? Who will be the biggest consumers of media? Who will buy their DVDs/Blu-Rays or whatever later?

    Attack Universities as a whole and you make the next generation of deciders pissed off at you...

    Oh and college guys think they know better (I know, I am one of them), so they tend to not bend over that easily....

    Bad move, really bad move...

  48. mod +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 insightful

  49. I'd agree with you but for one thing... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    (Please note: IANAL...)

    Innocent until proven guilty only applies to the Criminal Justice System.
    Civil law operates under the preponderance of evidence standard- and unless you invalidate the evidence the other
    side is presenting, if they've enough of it, you'll lose the case. That's how the RIAA is getting these things
    through- shock and awe. And pretty much every one of the cases so far that have actually gone to court have been
    a loss for the RIAA.

    I wish that one of the courts would twig onto the fact that the labels and RIAA are very probably acting
    as a vexatious litigant and punish them accordingly.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  50. The FBI pays - Why not the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently received a court order to provide telephone records from my phone company to the FBI. In the (sealed) order, the Federal District Court authorized me to bill the FBI (and ordered them to pay) for my expenses in complying with the order.

    Why should the RIAA be any different in their requests... after all - they don't even have the force of law behind them!

  51. Spam? by nairb774 · · Score: 1

    I'll start by saying there are better proactive methods. How about a week. I personally take the time to notify ISPs of spam emails originating from their networks. If the logs were gone in hours then these would be of no use. I usually get the notification out within about 4 hours but then you are expecting them to act immediately before the log goes. To me a week is short but not too short that it is useless to keep the logs.

    1. Re:Spam? by vinn01 · · Score: 1

      There are far better ways of addressing SMTP (spam) abuse than by relying on IP address log retention.

      It goes back to my comment on "poor security" as an excuse to retain logs.

  52. On students, by Asmandeus · · Score: 1

    I hope the Univesity of Nebaska wins this battle. I also hope that this is a sign of othe colleges sticking up fo thei students as well.

    But then again, it's all about who gets the money in the end isn't it? Looking out fo the paying custome seems to be in thei best inteest.

    1. Re:On students, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (psssssst, your R key is broken)

    2. Re:On students, by Asmandeus · · Score: 1

      "We've already seen the University of Wisconsin tell the RIAA to go away, but the University of Nebaska has gone one step further: it's asking the RIAA to pay up for wasting its time with the silly demand to push students into paying up. The spokesperson for the University also notes that since they constantly rotate IP addresses and have no need to hang onto that information for very long, they simply cannot help the RIAA. They have no clue who was attached to which IP address at the time the RIAA is complaining about."
  53. so then you propose by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    accepting things like the corporate buying of legislation, is that it?

    either that's wrong, and you get angry and fight it, or...

    "There is too much anger and fighting in this world."

    you accept it

    welcome to reality. the human condition is constant conflict. that never goes away. the beauty of representational democracy though is that conflict is redirected to words and deeds, rather than physical confrontation

    so work with what you got, and stop whining

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:so then you propose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I offered no proposal, nor am I whining. On the other hand, you haven't offered a proposal other than a vague call for anger.

  54. You might be a deviant... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    but it's not because you like to support the artists instead of the middlemen. I go to show, pay the cover (unless a buddy of mine is the promoter in which case I still might pay if I like the band), and then buy the CD from the band at the show.

    I am a deviant, but I still maintain the two are unrelated. ;-) I think most people would prefer the money go to the band.

  55. How about a similar approach to the BSA? by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    No, that's not the Boy Scouts, it's the "Business Software Association", AKA Microsoft's enforcers. Of course they've got even deeper pockets behind them than the AA's.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  56. OT: Your sig... by turgid · · Score: 1

    Is that real? If I click on it, will it redirect me to a pr0n site?

    1. Re:OT: Your sig... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's real. I've been developing it slowly in my spare time for the last few months. It runs on Mono/MS .NET/Portable.NET and has perhaps 1/3 of COBOL-85 implemented, along with some of the .NET extensions allowing it to use classes from the Framework and external assemblies. I plan on opening the source one I get time to implement a bit more and tidy up the bits I'm not happy with.

  57. Unwanted side effects by youthoftoday · · Score: 1

    Yeah, great, I'm sure we're all delighted that the underdog is sticking it to the RIAA.
    But surely this will result in the RIAA lobbying in the future for departments such as this to hold on to the information they're after? I'm sure they have friends in high places that can cause a *lot* of hassle...

    --
    -1 not first post
  58. That's what you get... by guruevi · · Score: 1

    when you try to annoy a University with a bunch of under-grad law students... would make for great real-life examples in class, or as a graduation project: Counter-suing of annoying companies.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  59. Next /. poll - favorite RIAA target by davidwr · · Score: 1

    College Students
    Single Mothers
    Dissabled Vets
    Household pets
    The Deceased
    Newborn babies
    People without internet And last but not least:

    PirateNeal
    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  60. Local coverage by Eric+Pierce · · Score: 1
  61. Makes me proud... by StarWreck · · Score: 1

    This article makes me so proud that my Dad went to the University of Nebraska. Go Cornhuskers!!

    On the other hand, it makes me sad that I went to a college that was so happy to help the RIAA when I uploaded a home-made parody of a Justin Timberlake song that I'm now in debtors prison. Thanks a lot!

    --
    ... and in the DRM, bind them.
  62. Baby Steps by 955301 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the RIAA needs to stop paying it's lawyers and start lobbying for faster movement to ipV6 instead. Then it won't have to rely on ISP's to cough up address-people relationships. They will be implicit in the registration of the IP block.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  63. +2 Funnier by idugcoal · · Score: 1

    The digg link was funny, but the /. link topped it. +2 Funnier.

  64. Commenter #4 on the Tech Dirt article nailed it! by Eric+Pierce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Commenter #4 on the Tech Dirt article nailed it!

    See for yourself: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070320/171228.s html

  65. They had to find a way ... by umeboshi · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... to let Godwin slip through the cracks. :)

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. Note that you can find extremely different spins by GnuDiff · · Score: 1

    in the media on the subject.

    For example, "Omaha Media Herald" http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=2 348353 shows the university as the guilty party. If you would only read that article, you would think university is squirming uncomfortably.

    What is interesting tho, is the mention of "taxpayers' dollars", with Uni saying it doesn't want to spend them on purschasing expensive anti-piracy software or modifying network to keep records on DHCP addresses, and RIAA retorting by saying Uni is wasting them(dollars) via bandwidth costs the pirates are using.

  69. As a member of the University of Nebraska IT staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    The dorms on campus are dynamic DHCP. Detailed records of what Mac addresses are asociated with what IP address when are kept for a month. Within that month UNL can easily associate a computer with an IP address at a certain time.
    If the RIAA was serious about actually doing something about piracy and not just PR, maybe they should not have waited so long before sending these notices? To my knowledge no law enforcement aganecy has ever had a problem with UNL networking's data retention policies. An law-enforcement agency has a warrant, networking complies with what data they have. And networking does pass along requests from companies like Sony for student to remove illegally shared materials from their computers.


    I have seen a lot of interpretations of this story, but the tech side is not very complicated. UNL simply has no technical reason to keep detailed mac address/IP address data longer than a month.


    I have no idea where the $11 per notice cost number mentioned in the article came from.



    I am personally very happy however, to see someone bite back at the RIAA, even in such a small way.



    My apologies for posting as A.C. but it is simpler this way.


    All errors in this messagee are from me trying to do two things at once. /. and monitor a process.

  70. Re:Official "Who's Next?" Pool by RsG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, I'm starting a pool. Who will the RIAA go after next? Place your bets.

    I'm taking whales.
    They can't go after wales. Do you know how hard it is to serve a subpoena in Welsh?

    You try reading legalise with all the vowels stripped out.
    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  71. Where is Nebaska? by danlock4 · · Score: 1

    Where is Nebaska? In the USA, I suppose, since the RIAA is "wasting its time"... but the USA is a big place.

    --
    To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    1. Re:Where is Nebaska? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nebraska is pretty much in the middle of nowhere. There's not much to see or do there although the college is probably a good size.

  72. Re:As a member of the University of Nebraska IT st by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Subject: As a member of the University of Nebraska IT staff

    The dorms on campus are dynamic DHCP. Detailed records of what Mac addresses are associated with what IP address when are kept for a month. Within that month UNL can easily associate a computer with an IP address at a certain time.
    As a former member of the UNL IT staff, I'm curious about when you switched everyone to dynamic DHCP. Dorms used to be static DHCP (and the occasional BOOTP), and the logs used to go back years, far enough to having date formats utilizing two-digit years. There were some sets of dynamic DHCP, and I remember extending the sizes of some dynamic DHCP blocks, but I didn't think you'd relinquish that control. No more computer registration at the 501 Bldg.?

    I guess that also means that residence hall rooms aren't assigned domain names that include either hall and room numbers or student names since everything is dynamic. I always thought that practice to be rather odious, broadcasting where people live to be recorded in the logs of every website they visit.

    And what happened to the machine csealumni?
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  73. Stick it to the RIAA... by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    ... as hard as you stuck it to Florida in the 1996 Orange Bowl!

    1. Re:Stick it to the RIAA... by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      And by the Orange Bowl, I mean the Fiesta Bowl. :P

  74. Re:Official "Who's Next?" Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is getting harder to get funding to defend the whales so they may be a ripe target.

  75. Re:uncle sam (will) say so (al least w/ipv4 it is) by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I guess the record companies would like us to all have ipv6 ip addresses printed on our foreheads if we want to listen to music. There aren't enough ipv4 addresses to do the job, so IPs will rotate, because that is more or less the point of DHCP, NAT, and other ways of conserving the IP space.

  76. I imagine her sin wasn't having a boyfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I remember when a very powerful guy, who's daughter had committed suicide because of the pressure her religious father put on her because she committed the grevious sin of having a boyfriend, tried to pressure the University that I was working for a the time to give up email records so he could find out who the boyfriend was. It was clear at the time that his intention was to go after this boy for "sinning" with his daughter,

    ... but having sex with the boyfriend. The dad didn't put the rope around her neck, or the guy's dick in her pussy, she did.

    I don't see why you put "sinning" in quotes...

    1. Re:I imagine her sin wasn't having a boyfriend... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you put "sinning" in quotes..

      Shame on you.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  77. Re:Note that you can find extremely different spin by Falladir · · Score: 1

    It's frustrating that the newsmedia do so much to encourage the public misconception that downloading music can get you in trouble with the RIAA.

    That aside, (and this may be an unpopular stance) it seems unreasonable that the university should expect to be reimbursed for scolding students. As the gatekeepers, they're responsible for shutting anyone down who is violating copyright laws. They may have to penalize the offenders to discourage bad behavior, and they may have to suspend access for some student. That's what a responsible institution will do.

  78. Fair use....... FAIRLY by Sproggit · · Score: 1

    Here's an idea:
    How about putting up a website with all the bands that are signed up to RIAA affiliated labels (and non signed bands, obviously)?
    We then need to find out how to send money to those artists without the labels receiving any.

    Then, if you like a band, and have (or want to) download some of their art, you can contribute as much as you feel is fair, for them to continue providing you with entertainment.
    The website doesn't need to host any copyrighted work, if you dont know how to get that anyway, you have no business on slashdot.

    According to Courtney Love, http://www.jdray.com/Daviews/courtney.html
    the bands will end up making more money this way anyway.