Slashdot Mirror


Cart Locking System Released as Open Source

An anonymous reader writes "You may have noticed that over the past few years it has become increasingly common to find supermarket and large retail store shopping carts equipped with 'boots' designed to lock up if you try to take the cart outside of the store. Now, someone has discovered through some clever analysis the signal used to both lock and unlock carts, and has designed a portable system that locks up all carts within 20 feet of the emitter! They have released the schematics, software, and detailed instructions for assembling the systems on Instructables, an online magazine dedicated to releasing howto's for everything from rat taxidermy to Shopping Cart EMPs under a Creative Commons License."

323 comments

  1. Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what I need... some snot-nosed kid locking up all the carriages in the parking lot.

    1. Re:Oh Great by Bodero · · Score: 1

      Did you see the plans? No snot nosed kid will be building these unless he's got an EE degree.

      Trust me, I was tempted at first.

    2. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact I did... I immediately noticed no solder mask on their PCB ... amateurs! :)

    3. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course nobody actually read through the instructions, otherwise they wold have commented on the cutie modeling the finished product!

    4. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I figure I could have built one of these when I was about 15. I don't think I was snot nosed at the time, but I was definitely a kid and I didn't have an EE (nor do I now). I think you'd be surprised what smart kids can do when they're bored. I know at the time I had figured out how to turn my garage door opener into a universal garage door opener that would open all garage doors of the same model.

    5. Re:Oh Great by NoMaster · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, read the article. EE? Maybe in the slashdot / linux world, where people are so afraid of actual electronics that they purposely redesign in software things better accomplished in hardware (see most of the open source IR-Blaster type projects for a really depressing example of this - no need to be afraid of filters and demodulators, guys!).

      I was building stuff of that sort of complexity 30 years ago, when I was 10. In fact, after reading the how it works, I bet I could have built it back then without resorting to a black-box microcontroller - a couple of oscillators, dividers, and hex/decade counters would do the trick.

      And no, she's not that good looking...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    6. Re:Oh Great by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, did you RTFA? Look at the signal, it's obviously an encoded byte. You would prefer to create a system where you have to rebuild the entire system if they change the code? She even explicitly mention that different stores have different codes, and that she included a simple switch to choose which signal to broadcast... seems like smart engineering to make your interface as easily modified as the system it's interfacing with.

      Did you look at the hardware or read the descriptions of the design? It's pretty clear that she is not at all afraid of circuitry, and even included *many* disclaimers showing people places where if they didn't follow the electronics design properly they could be seriously injured.

    7. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I see no reason you and I cannot co-exist.

      If only the Shia and Shiite could follow our example.

    8. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha... f'n hysterical... except that the shia and shiite are one and the same. substitute sunni for one of them and you've got an awesome joke.

    9. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dammit, I fucked up. Thanks for the correction.

    10. Re:Oh Great by brian.gunderson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best.Troll.Thread.Ever.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    11. Re:Oh Great by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      No snot nosed kid will be building these unless he's got an EE degree.

      Why would you need an EE degree? It's about six components, with most of the hard work done in software. There's nothing to it.

    12. Re:Oh Great by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I don't have a EE degree, but I've _designed_ and constructed more complex electronics than in the article.

    13. Re:Oh Great by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Just what I need... some snot-nosed kid locking up all the carriages in the parking lot."

      Snot nosed kid??? Hehehe...I know plenty in the OVER 40yr crowd that thinks this would be fun to play with.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Oh Great by tepples · · Score: 1

      EE? Maybe in the slashdot / linux world, where people are so afraid of actual electronics that they purposely redesign in software things better accomplished in hardware It's less expensive to reprogram software than to reprogram hardware.
  2. I smell...... by Elsapotk421 · · Score: 3, Funny

    a fair amount of mischief about.....or maybe it's just cowboyneal.

    --
    We came,we saw, we kicked it's ass!
    1. Re:I smell...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I found the diagrams on the bottom of this page to be most informative.

      http://www.instructables.com/id/SDIS7ALF3ER7V5W/

    2. Re:I smell...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd lick her feet!!!

      ROWL!

    3. Re:I smell...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is off-topic, but would you look at the size of those man-breasts on the geek demoing the device (Page 8 or 9).

      Just sickening, really.

    4. Re:I smell...... by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 1

      And if I ever produced the soldering seen on this page, I'd be asked to hand in my soldering iron and go mop the floor.

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
  3. This sure sounds ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... like a lot more fun than an iPhone. Plus it doesn't require a 2 year AT&T commitment ;-)

    1. Re:This sure sounds ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. And where were the iPhone stories today. I miss them.

    2. Re:This sure sounds ... by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      Maybe true: no 2 year committment to ATT, but perhaps a 1 year committment in the local state penitentiary :-). Well, this is probably better than to be with ATT, so GO FOR IT!

    3. Re:This sure sounds ... by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe true: no 2 year committment to ATT, but perhaps a 1 year committment in the local state penitentiary :-).

      Are you seriously claiming that you'll get jail time for fucking with shopping carts ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:This sure sounds ... by Ikoma+Andy · · Score: 1

      Welcome to modern America.

    5. Re:This sure sounds ... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Some supermarkets in the UK use this technology too.:)

  4. I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it really a good idea to show all pranksters in the world how to lock up a bunch of innocent people's carts in a store?

    I'd much prefer if supermarket pranksters stuck to less annoying pranks, like hiding a speakerphone and ketchup bags in a baby-less baby-holder, having it play "crying" sounds, and then publicly "beating" the "baby" until it "bleeds".

    1. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by daeg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I prefer real babies for that authentic feel and sound.

    2. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hell yeah its a good idea.

      If they're showing you how to to do it with a 20 feet, someone will figure out how to do it over a 200ft range.

      How about a snipers rifle kinda device that works over a longer range... THAT'D BE SO COOL...
      or leaving smaller devices around supermarkets that pulse every few hours...
      or hiding them on the carts themselves.

      The possibilities are almost endless.

      If enough people do it, the supermarkets will realize shopping cart DRM is a bad idea.

    3. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or turning the boxes of pineapple upside down cake mixes upside down! That will show the man!

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    4. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Goaway · · Score: 4, Funny

      If enough people do it, the supermarkets will realize shopping cart DRM is a bad idea.

      Yeah, how dare they lock up our shopping cart culture with their technological barriers!

    5. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, shopping carts want to be free!

    6. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by spoco2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If enough people do it, the supermarkets will realize shopping cart DRM is a bad idea."

      What the crap are you talking about?

      Having shopping carts lock when you try to take them outside the designated area is a perfectly FINE thing for a store to want to do... how many times have you seen shopping trolleys dumped in the most odd places? There's nothing wrong with them trying to stop people stealing their property, they cost a lot of money and should only be used in that area anyway.

      My god some people just like to jump up and down whenever anyone is doing something to protect themselves, no matter how just it may be.

      Bah to you sir, bah indeed.

    7. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by DittoBox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was abou to mention something about "Comments like that one are what the 'Post Anonymously' checkbox is for." But then I realized you were modded 'insightful.'

      Twice.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    8. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by JustShootMe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah. That's utterly ridiculous.

      This is not shopping cart DRM. This is the equivalent of putting a strap on your car stereo and bolting it to the frame. Not only that, but a shopping cart is REAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY.

      Anyone who thinks that stores don't have a right to protect their own property has lost all touch with reality.

      --
      For linux tips: http://www.linuxtipsblog.com
    9. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by frostband · · Score: 1

      I read the quote in your post, "If enough people do it..." and I thought that was a very funny line. Then I read your post and I thought for sure that you had just been mistaken about his tone. Then I read the original post and unfortunately, I can't tell if he meant for it to be funny or not. Had he only used that one line, he would have gotten a +5 funny for sure.

    10. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by weber · · Score: 1

      Where I'm from the trolleys are all chained together (blurred out some kid on the pic and added black circles around areas of interest).
      To unchain one you have to insert a 10 or 20 kroner coin into a box on the trolley. You get your money back (the coin pops out) when you return the trolley and chain it back up. I think it works quite well. Low tech.

    11. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you get neutered you so you won't have any, scum bag.

    12. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I think pretty much the whole world does that.

      I don't quite know the exchange rate for kroner, but I doubt a bad-willing person will be poor enough to care about 10-20 kroner.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    13. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't quite know the exchange rate for kroner, but I doubt a bad-willing person will be poor enough to care about 10-20 kroner.

      They probably won't. But why do shopping carts disappear in the first place? Mostly kids having fun, I guess. And kids don't have enough money to waste on that. Other times they disappear because someone thought that taking the cart home was easier than carrying their groceries all the way. So they'll bring back the cart next time they go shopping, rather than dumping it. It may not be a lot of money, but over time it adds up.

      And when a shopping cart is abandoned somewhere, some kids are likely to find it and think "Ohh, money... Candy...", and bring it back. Easy money earned.

    14. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by sqldr · · Score: 1

      I don't quite know the exchange rate for kroner, but I doubt a bad-willing person will be poor enough to care about 10-20 kroner.

      You've seen the price of beer in Norway, right?

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    15. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only that but ours are £1 coin sized and places sell you a keyring with a £1 coin sized piece of metal hanging off it for use in supermarket trollies.

      http://www.tenovus.com/index.cfm?UUID=FA3D05C9-65B F-7E43-3C7253387FBBB56B

      http://www.alzscot.org/store/pages/Trolley_keyring 219113800.htm

      http://www.schshop.org.uk/keyrings.html

      etc.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    16. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      But why do shopping carts disappear in the first place? -Mexicans (collect metal scrap)
      -Chinese (collect bottles/cans)

    17. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Funny

      How dare they lock up shopping carts. Don't they know, that they just like to go for a swim once in a while, before being brutally dragged back to work by those thugs.

    18. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      I was actually quite shocked the first time I found out how much those things -actually- cost. It's actually rather frightening.

    19. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      If enough people do it, the supermarkets will realize shopping cart DRM is a bad idea.

      krrrrk...Lock-up on aisle three!

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    20. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      They're likely quoting the cost of purchase, not how much it's worth after several years of beef juice leaking all over the bottom.

    21. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by vi9er · · Score: 1

      That wooshing sound was the sarcasm flying over your head.

    22. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So instead of risking my £1, I can buy something that is the same size for £1.50 that is used for no other purpose?

      Suddenly the decline of the British Empire makes so much more sense.

    23. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by winnabago · · Score: 1

      It's not always up to the retailer, either. Boston, for example, requires "shopping cart retention" by law.

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    24. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      I fully agree, as re-production of physical items has a very tangible cost, while re-production of digital ones does not, you can not compare the two.

    25. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by mstahl · · Score: 1

      *whoosh!*

      There's a reason it's modded "funny", guys.

    26. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks that stores don't have a right to protect their own property has lost all touch with reality.
      Welcome to slashdot!
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      This is not shopping cart DRM. This is the equivalent of putting a strap on your car stereo and bolting it to the frame. Not only that, but a shopping cart is REAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY.

      Listen buddy, this is the last empty shopping cart in the store, and I got to it before you did.

      It's MINE, dammit!

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    28. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. But there's even more. Not all of those "tokens" or whatever they should be called are detachable. Therefore people leave their keys with "token" attached to shopping cart unattended. It won't take much to take photo of keys and duplicate them later or simply steal keys and use them to steal your car from parking lot etc.

    29. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Gaerek · · Score: 1

      Not much on sarcasm, eh?

    30. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I think pretty much the whole world does that.
      Some supermarkets do that in England. The ones I rarely shop at. It pretty much means you can't go shopping if you haven't got any change, and it assumes you're a criminal. Most notably, the most successful supermarket in Britain by far doesn't make you put coins in.

      It's only a pound anyway, far less than the worth of a trolley. Probably easy to smash the coin back out anyway, before throwing it in the canal.
    31. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Personally, I thought the sniper's rifle idea gave it away that it was a joke, but maybe I just have a strange sense of humour.

    32. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by malakai · · Score: 1

      I sense we'll see more and more of this senseless wannabe white-hat digital distrurbance engineering.

      My hope is, someone will use this and lock up the cart of some mother with a 2-yo in the cart-seat crying while she tries to do one hour of shopping in 15 mins so she can reach three other places across town and pick up the other two kids and the dry cleaning.

      The jokster will laugh and look obvious, and some level headed salt of the earth construction worker pouring concrete for a new curb will put one + one together and find the giggling dork 20 feet away and punch the fuck_the_world_bring_chaos_i_want_attention kid in the face. Then break his toy.

      Congrats on being bale to read a schematic and put together 10 dollars of Radio Shack components. You are .0001 smarter than a script kiddie who figured out how to exec a sh script from his schools computer.

      I'll paypal $100 dollars to someone that builds me a locator for this device. I wanna know when someone is using it, what direction they are, and how far they are from me.

    33. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      "Anyone who thinks that stores don't have a right to protect their own property has lost all touch with reality."

      Anyone who took that first message about shopping cart DRM seriously isn't either, so join the club.

    34. Re:I'm not big on security by obscurity, but... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      It was terribly worded sarcasm if indeed it was, and even if it was, the problem is that WAY too many Slashdotters would have read it and gone 'F*ck yeah man, stick it to the man' without even thinking about what an insanely stupid idea the whole thing is.

      The fact that the site has pictures of people just trying to do their shopping being f*cked around by this person highlights how stupid it is.

  5. Redefining the shopping experience... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not have all the carts locked up when someone takes a cart outside the zone and have an alarm goes off on the offending cart. That way the perp can be lynched by the shopping mob before the carts unlocked. That should reduce the number of incidents.

    1. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 4, Funny

      All the carts in my local are already locked up, and they have no 'boot'. I was suprised to hear that a store in the world actually has functioning shopping carts, or at least ones without two wonky wheels out of four.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    2. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'd give my life in defence of my supermarket.

    3. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 1

      Man it's impossible to say the word wonky and not laugh.

    4. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by neonmonk · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      Someone should design a shopping trolley with power steering, suspension and a sports muffler!

    5. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by kc-guy · · Score: 1

      The Walmart in New Orleans had a perimeter shopping cart defense mechanism...that kicked in before you reached the end of the parking lot. Since not all the wheels locked, I made a point of dragging them as far away from the store as possible. IMHO, Aldi's cart return system has worked pretty well in KC.

    6. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Seumas · · Score: 0

      Who needs shopping carts? If you want to redefine the shopping experience - try avoiding the shopping experience.

      I haven't been to a grocery store since late 1999, thanks to Peapod, Webvan, Safeway, Albertsons, Kingsoopers and others who have had internet based grocery shopping and into-your-kitchen delivery for most of a decade now.

      Why, in the year 2007, someone would willingly subject themselves to wasting the gas and time to drive to the store, wander the aisles and navigate the idiots, their kids, long lines, shoddy carts, carrying bags out to the car, driving home, unloading the groceries . . . I have no idea. And most people spend a few hours doing that every damn week.

      My shopping experiences consists of entering a URL, clicking on a saved order, submitting it and then making sure I'm home when the groceries are delivered during a two-hour window on the day of my choosing. I spend a whole five minutes at the most doing my shopping. And then the store brings my groceries to me... right into my kitchen and puts them on the counter.

    7. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like a MiniCooper to me. Maybe not the power steering though.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Basic human contact and interaction with your neighborhood is now a thing of the past folks. It's 2007 now, why the hell should I still have to know who that idiot living next door is?

    9. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Don_dumb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if your source of interaction and human contact is the local grocery store... maybe you should be ordering your groceries over the internet and use those hours you'll save every week or month to actually go get a life and have real interactions with real people I assume you live in America where Villages dont exist?
      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    10. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Technician · · Score: 1

      Someone should design a shopping trolley with power steering, suspension and a sports muffler!

      Like this one?
      http://bigpicture.typepad.com/writing/images/shop_ cart.jpg

      or this one?
      http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/12/neuro tikart_hom.html

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    11. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Unless they deliver ~7pm, the rest of us kind of have to go to work. Who's going to let them (and my delicious groceries) into the house?

    12. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Why, in the year 2007, someone would willingly subject themselves to wasting the gas and time to drive to the store, wander the aisles and navigate the idiots, their kids, long lines, shoddy carts, carrying bags out to the car, driving home, unloading the groceries . . . I have no idea. And most people spend a few hours doing that every damn week."

      Well, I can only imagine your method would work for someone that only buys canned or frozen or pre-prepared meals. I cook most everything from scratch, and I'd not be too keen to trust someone else to look through the fruits and veggies to pick out the best and ripest, or to look at the meat section and get the best looking cuts, etc. I like to cook....a LOT, and I actually find the grocery store to be a pleasant experience. I do try, and get there early on Sunday mornings usually...before churches let out and the big crowds hit.

      I also will see things there that I might have missed in the ads that look good, or maybe something marked down for sale that day, and I'll make up a dish using that, etc....I like the occasional impulse by that shopping at the store leads too.

      That's the long way of saying, I'd have a hard time shopping online for anything but prepacked stuff....and I don't eat very much of that at all...

      Do the online stores take coupons?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to a grocery store since late 1999, thanks to Peapod, Webvan, Safeway, Albertsons, Kingsoopers and others who have had internet based grocery shopping and into-your-kitchen delivery for most of a decade now.
      I admire the bravery of someone who buys meat and veg without seeing it first. And which butchers/greengrocers/fishmongers delivery by the way? We don't all eat supermarket crap.

      submitting it and then making sure I'm home when the groceries are delivered during a two-hour window on the day of my choosing.
      So instead of spending half an hour at the shop, you spend two hours sat at home waiting for the delivery, then who knows how long checking for 'substitutions', meaning you have to go to the shop anyway?

      Oh, and what's the betting when they select your items they give you all the stalest things on the shelf? And somehow I don't think a website is as easy to browse as a supermarket.
    14. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for enlightening me to the wonderful world of connectivity available to me. If this was a sampling of that, keep it. I'll keep sitting out on my porch chatting with my neighbors because they're good people, even if we don't share many similar interests beyond a couple of beers and some musings about the day. Seriously, man. You're posting on Slashdot and you don't understand that it's possible to have more than one source of human contact, that you can be friendly to those who happen to live close to you as well as those who know through some other sort of social connection? I guess I'm just old-fashioned, but I start to feel uncomfortable and disconnected when I don't know the people in my neighborhood. BTW, I never said "meet your neighbors" so don't put it in quotes and pretend like I did. You're one of those people who gets flustered when someone you don't know has the audacity to say something to you that requires a response, aren't you?

    15. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      Had to reply to this one, too. Villages still exist in America, they're called small towns and that's where I grew up. Neighborhoods exist, too, if you can find them, and that's where I live now. This country is not entirely barren exurbs yet. There are still some people in this country who don't get nervous at a friendly smile and greeting from a stranger.

    16. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Point taken I meant no offence, I knew the US has small conurbations where the shop is one of the main social centers, the grandparent didn't seem to be aware of this. The mocking nature of my post was just joking about the fact that even a place of only double figure inhabitants is still referred to as a "town".

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    17. Re:Redefining the shopping experience... by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      Interesting note: in NY state those are still called villages. I was surprised to learn that because I thought that "village" carried a connotation that a lot of people are uncomfortable with.

  6. First Lock! by IamScared · · Score: 0

    First Lock!

    --
    FreeBSD: Because Computers Can Be Fun... Again.
  7. the unlock feature by ksheff · · Score: 3, Funny

    will be of great interest to a certain inhabitant of the Sunnyvale trailer park.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    1. Re:the unlock feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Many Slashdotters may not recognize this reference. It's from the Canadian comedy series Trailer Park Boys. One of the main characters, Bubbles, steals shopping carts and sells them to competing stores for a living.

      If I recall correctly, TPB was aired for one season in the US. Unfortunately it was aired in a censored form (which destroyed much of the humour) and so it tanked down there. Meanwhile in canada TPB was become a very recognizable part of mainstream canadian culture.

  8. a solution that works somewhat here..... by Elsapotk421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we have shopping carts that are all chained together...you insert a one euro coin to remove it and then take the cart back to the cart corral to retrieve your coin....it seems to work fairly well here.

    --
    We came,we saw, we kicked it's ass!
    1. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      It works well until inflation kicks in. 10 years from now, kids and the homeless will be returning those carts by the dozen because everyone else couldn't be bothered walking back for a euro.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      At Aldi stores in the United States, you insert a quarter ($0.25). I think they have problems with cart rotation though.

    3. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      we have shopping carts that are all chained together...you insert a one euro coin to remove it and then take the cart back to the cart corral to retrieve your coin....it seems to work fairly well here. So if you don't return it, you bought a shopping trolly for one euro. Sweet! How much is that in American, $50? I hear the exchange rate has been sucking lately.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That gets people to take it back to a cart corral instead of just dropping it in the parking lot... I think this is more aimed at people who try to steal carts (they're surprisingly expensive).

    5. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      In France, they used to be a ten Franc piece. When the Euro was introduced, it was worth about 6-7 Francs, so there's already been some devaluation. Here in the UK, they use a £1 coin, which is worth just under 1.5.

      The same approximate denomination of coin has been used for about 20 years, and so I don't expect inflation to be a huge issue for a lot longer than ten years, unless Europe catches up with the US in terms of inflation.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That already happens (at least here in Ireland, where a euro ain't worth much anymore), and is considered a feature, not a bug. It doesn't really matter _who_ returns the trolley, so long as someone does.

    7. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      I used to see those around here in Kansas City. Except of coarse we used quarters and not Euros. The system seemed to work just fine to me, but at some point it must have fallen out of favour because I have not seen them for quite some time.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    8. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by martinX · · Score: 1

      We have that at Aldi stores here (Australia) and it has been tried in others, but they dropped it. Sounds like a good idea, but you try and juggle all the shopping and two little kids, the last thing you are going to do is take the damn trolley back. So you get pissed off that you've been charged a dollar for the privilege of shopping there, so you go to the supermarket that doesn't charge that. You may end up paying more, but you're shopping somewhere that doesn't treat you like a delinquent for not returning your trolley. If it was 20 cents, I'd gladly leave it in the trolley for enterprising youth to claim, but a dollar is a tad high.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    9. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, they used 20c coins.. no-one returned the trolleys. Us kids used to collect them for pocket money, and the joy of outrunning the fat security guards who would chase us around the underground carpark.

      Now the only few stores that do this use $2 coins and everyone returns them.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by click2005 · · Score: 1

      If you use 2 coins, 2 trolleys.. flip them facing away from each other on the ground kinda like a reverse 69. This should allow you to get both coins back by putting the chain from one cart into the other.

      If the chain is long enough, you can do this around a lamppost.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    11. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      the biggest problem i have with it is it requires me to lug change around. my convienence > trolleys worth to a grociery store.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    12. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      The chain is tiny, too short for you to couple a cart with itself by one link. The ways trolleys nest makes them just fit.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    13. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      ...but nobody uses the carts anymore 'cause they couldn't find a $2 coin. Seriously, they exist?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by click2005 · · Score: 1

      I've done it with Aldi trolleys in the UK that take £1 coins.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    15. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Australia.

      Where our $2 coin is smaller than our $1 coin.

      Kinda like how, in the US, your 10c coin is smaller than your 5c coin.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    16. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's just a bit more than a buck (I think 1.33 or something is the rate), but still, you get a farily cheap trolly.

      But let's be serious now. Yes, it's common in some places here that people "drive" their groceries home in the cart, but they usually bring it back, sooner or later. The homeless people that could "profit" from the carts usually won't spend that Euro for something they can fairly easily get for free.

      Maybe it works because people here already brought their carts back before they were "leased". Dunno.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like with most highly sophisticated systems, an unfolded paper clip will do fine.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    18. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      If it was 20 cents, I'd gladly leave it in the trolley for enterprising youth to claim

      Australian youth must be really well behaved. 'Enterprising' youth here would rather have some fun and dump it in the canal than return it for a mere 20 eurocent. Of course the lack of canals in Australia might have something to do with it as well.

    19. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe I'm *hoping* they'd take it back for 20 cents. Chances are the return is too low for the youths old enough to push trolleys around safely, and shopping centres probably don't want 8 year olds pushing them around for pocket change. One flattened kid just isn't worth the hassle.

        Cue the "Back in my day, you could buy ... for 2 cents" speech.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    20. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      The Aldi stores do it not so much to prevent theft (a person who wants a cart would happily spend a quarter for it.)

      The real reason is to encourage people to return the carts to the corral so that they don't have to employ teenage boys to round them up like all the stores used to.

      --
      This space available.
    21. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hm. Well, in the US, our 10 and 25 coins used to be silver, with the former proportionately smaller than the latter. There used to be silver 5 coins, but they were impractically small. When the nickel replaced them, for some weird reason, the mint decided to make the coin 5g in mass (none of our other coins are metric), and made of less precious metal, and so we wound up with the current odd relative sizes.

      What's the story with your coins?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    22. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Belacgod · · Score: 1

      When your kids get a bit older, you send them to put the trolley back to get them out of your hair for a bit. They have fun, pocket the $1, and then you go home.

    23. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The designers were drunk at the time, I believe.

    24. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      side by side, one facting one way one facing the other, the chains should fit that way with the bonus of being obnoxious to move while stuck together like that.


      do this in the middle of the aisle on a busy day for instant lulz

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    25. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Isn't a euro the same value basically anywhere?

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    26. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by martin_henry · · Score: 0

      I don't know how they evolved, but the Australian $1 and $2 coins are gold colored, while the rest (5,20, 50) are silver colored.

      --
      www.purevolume.com/martyd
    27. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The designers were drunk at the time, I believe.

      Yes, we already established that they are Australians.

    28. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Which is fine until people start making it a full time career. It's no fun to have your trolley disappear the moment you turn your back on it, leaving you with bags to carry and no $2.50 deposit (curse you, AU -> UK exchange rate). This sort of thing works well until it really catches on and then it gets annoying. Then again I never had problems like that in mainland Europe when I was over there so maybe it was just London. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    29. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by fredklein · · Score: 1

      tThey have fun, pocket the $1, and then you go home.

      I think you mean "They get run over in the parking lot, die, and you go to jail".

    30. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by deniable · · Score: 1

      You need to think in 3 dimensions. We had these for a while. Some knob-end managed to put one back with another one wedged in between. A nice old lady couldn't get her coin back. We got it back and sent her on her way. We then built a 3d sculpture to get our own dollar back. I can't remember the exact topology but it had two layers. What can I say, we were bored.

      This system was removed not long after. The same place now has the boots. You can tell the boundary from the line of trolleys just past it. People had to see how it worked, I guess.

    31. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Isn't a euro the same value basically anywhere?

      Yes, it's worth a euro everywhere. :)

    32. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by donutz · · Score: 2, Funny

      we have shopping carts that are all chained together...you insert a one euro coin to remove it and then take the cart back to the cart corral to retrieve your coin....it seems to work fairly well here.

      That would never work here in the States...no one carries one euro coins...

    33. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by hendersj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep, that's exactly what it's aimed at.

      Used to work for the corporate side of a large food & drug retailer in the US; those shopping carts, wobbly wheels and all, cost on average about $120 each - and that's before the wheel lock systems were put in place (no doubt that has driven the cost up).

      The ironic thing here is that some of the supermarkets have parking spaces outside the lot, but the carts don't roll outside the lots, so sometimes people can't get their shopping back to their cars. On the flip side, I watched one lady try to steal one of these carts - she got about 3/4 of a block away with it, and it was quite a struggle for her. Clearly she hadn't read the signs that said the cart wouldn't work outside the parking lot. It also was clear that what was in the cart wasn't her shopping.

      Loss prevention is big business. This is what happens when people steal from local stores - the stores end up having to put measures in place that inconvenience everyone.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    34. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      I saw that in a Tom Hanks movie...

    35. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by redcane · · Score: 1

      There used to be 1 and 2 dollar notes, with the existing 5/10/20/50 cent coins. These were replaced with the "gold" 1 and two dollar coins, at around the same decade as the 1 and 2 cent coins (which were brown), were phased out.

    36. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      fyi, 1 estonian kroon coin works as well and costs 1/15th of an euro coin. it works even in safe deposit boxes.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    37. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder what the parking lots look like then, those trolleys aren't going to teleport elsewhere so if everyone just left his trolley where it was wouldn't that block large parts of the lot?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    38. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Nope . Noone leaves the carts in the central driving area. They leave it in the parking spaces so only a parking space is wasted or even better they leave it in the dead zone provided next to handicapped parking spots for unloading wheelchairs.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    39. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      niiice, assuming the coinboxes are flush left or flush right that's perfect. THe ones I remember have them jimmied a little way in, though.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    40. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      Saw this a fair old bit at uni.

      Students, who mostly don't have cars, going shopping at the supermarket just far enough away to be a pain to carry stuff. So the trollies came too. Of course, it was also far enough away that it was a pain to take 'em back, which got to be a real big problem until a few bright sparks realised that a few of 'em is worth the effort, for the pound coins in 'em.

      Of course, given these were students, a lot of the trollies had also been vandalised to get the pound coins out.

    41. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by specific_pacific · · Score: 1

      Me and the housemates when living in the UK stole a complimentary wheelchair from Tescos and then later used it to do ollies after a few beers. We returned the trolly though.

    42. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And that all despite such a simple solution. All you had to find is another one in the same desperate situation. You can get the coins out fairly easily if you have two such trollies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    43. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What's the story with your coins?

      The EU decided they should be like that. And they didn't even dream of making them out of some sort of expensive alloy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    44. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing here is that some of the supermarkets have parking spaces outside the lot, but the carts don't roll outside the lots, so sometimes people can't get their shopping back to their cars.

      Funny, where I grew up, there were posts around the sidewalk immediately next to the grocery store, and you had to actually do some physical exercise and carry your frickin' groceries to the car.

      (Or, if you were lazy, drive the car up to the barriers)

      Seems like a much cheaper, simpler, and more effective solution.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    45. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by hendersj · · Score: 1

      Well, that solution works if you only have a couple of bags, but if you've bought a weeks' worth of groceries for a family of 10 (and that's not uncommon where I live), that can be a problem. Especially if there's a risk of people stealing your groceries while you're schlepping bags from the cart to the car.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    46. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Students, who mostly don't have cars, going shopping at the supermarket just far enough away to be a pain to carry stuff. "

      Wow...where did you go to school? When I went, I can't think but of about 2 people I knew that didn't have a car....pretty much everyone had a car. Hell, most seniors in high schools I know of have a car...I did.

      And I graduated college a couple of decades ago...I imagine it is even more common nowdays.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      Different country, different culture. In the UK, driving age is somewhat higher (you get to start learning at 17, and are restricted for your first year after passing your test). As such, most students aren't drivers when they start university - they may have passed their test, but chances are they haven't bought a car. Cars, insurance (mandatory, and expensive when you're young) and fuel are also notably more expensive.

      These factors combine, to mean that 'university' the guy with a car is in a definite minority. High school age, people probably haven't even started learning to drive. They're unlikely to actually own their own vehicle though

    48. Re:a solution that works somewhat here..... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Man, you should have posted that on your real account. This Aussie LOLed.

  9. I felt a great disturbance in the force by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 5, Funny

    As if millions of homeless suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. ;-)

    1. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was totally unrelated; it was due to the cold snap last winter. Global warming, my ass!

    2. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was totally unrelated; it was due to the cold snap last winter. Global warming, my ass!

      Jesus, what are you feeding your homeless? A seven month delayed reaction?
    3. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the force by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      As if millions of homeless suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. ;-) I don't know how many times I've gone for a nap on a park bench to find my shopping cart stolen when I wake up.

      This portable shopping cart antitheft technology is just what the homeless community has been waiting for!

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  10. Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Creative Commons is not Open Source. Creative Commons is not Open Source. Creative Commons is not Open Source.

    1. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. It just doesn't line up with your particular prejudices is all.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by sholden · · Score: 1

      Since it's a well defined trademarked term all that matters is what OSI thinks. They use it for their web content but don't list at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical so it would seem they don't think it is Open Source and hence it isn't by definition.

    3. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Open Source is not trademarked whatsoever by OSI. Open Source Initiative Approved License(r) is trademarked by OSI.

      So no, it doesn't matter what OSI thinks, because they hold no trademark on "Open Source"

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    4. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It matters because they invented the term. Just like all those people in the 80s use threw around the term "object oriented" when they weren't even close (yes, I'm looking at you Oberon). Some words have meaning that is free to change with use. Other words are jargon and have very specific meanings which are defined by an authority, and are not subject to change.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      The question then, is if the given creative commons license meets the OSI definition, not it OSI approved it. Most of them do not, as far as I know, meet the definition, (though they are likely still copyleft). A full derivatives allowed, commercial allowed, by attribution license would seem close enough to me though.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    6. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by 2short · · Score: 1


      Some words are used by people who intend them to mean specific technical things, as defined by some authority. That doesn't mean any particular listener or other user will go along though.

      As the number of people who use the term "open source", and the number of people who hear it and think they understand it is undoubtably many times the number of people who have ever read the OSI definition, it is a bit presumtuous to declare them all wrong in any objective sense. "Open Source, as defined by the OSI" has a specific meaning not subject to change by anyone other than the OSI; but this definition is not the same as the definition of "open source" in common use.

    7. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent comment is made up of a six-word sentence copy-and-pasted three times, and is modded "+5 Informative".

    8. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      ... and not only that, the design requires lots of proprietary things to work, such as Eagle PCB. They could have used gEDA PCB instead which is offered under the terms of the GNU GPL.

    9. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent comment is made up of a six-word sentence copy-and-pasted three times, and is modded "+5 Informative". Perhaps you missed the secret message hidden in the post. Try reading it again.
    10. Re:Creative Commons is not Open Source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't mean any particular listener or other user will go along though. Copy that, RMS? He's talking to YOU.
  11. One step further by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

    Now if only somebody could figure out a way to do this to automobiles remotely...oh the fun!

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    1. Re:One step further by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      An OnStar hack would be fun...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  12. license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Open Source it is not.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re: license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      Just because it's not the GPL or whatnot doesn't mean it's not "Open Source".

      The complete documentation, schematics, and code is released. The only restriction is (as far as I can see) that it not be used in commercial products, and that any changes made stay under the same license. Just because they chose not to allow people to sell it (though it looks like that may have been because they were worried about people being sued) doesn't mean it's not open source, they just chose a different set of restrictions on their work than you might have.

    2. Re: license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by QuantumG · · Score: 1
      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re: license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by jfedor · · Score: 1

      Just because you can see the code, it doesn't mean that it's open source (remember Microsoft's "shared source"?).

      OSI's Open Source Definition specifically forbids such not-for-commercial-use clauses.

    4. Re: license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      The OSI doesn't own the term "Open Source". Technically, anyone can use it. Relevant trademark search: http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=o oaet0.1.1&p_search=searchss&p_L=50&BackReference=& p_plural=yes&p_s_PARA1=&p_tagrepl~%3A=PARA1%24LD&e xpr=PARA1+AND+PARA2&p_s_PARA2=open+source&p_tagrep l~%3A=PARA2%24COMB&p_op_ALL=AND&a_default=search&a _search=Submit+Query&a_search=Submit+Query. They can prohibit use of "Open Source Initiative Approved License(r)" but they can't say what "Open Source" is because they own no trademark on it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    5. Re: license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't really give two shits about who owns what trademark. The OSI coined the term, therefore their definition is the correct one. If you want to use it in some weird esoteric way, go elsewhere.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re: license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The OSI coined the term

      No they didn't. It was used before OSI; Caldera used it back in 1997.

  13. Wacky Race by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    This 4th of July when both me & my neighbor get our lazy asses to the grocery store to get cookout supplies at the last minute, I will laugh evily when he flies over the handlebars & lands in his basket when we're both 10 feet away from the last case of beer.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Wacky Race by vladsinger · · Score: 0, Troll

      Unfortunately, your cart would be locked too, would it not. Rather kills the point, I think...

    2. Re:Wacky Race by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, your cart would be locked too, would it not. Rather kills the point, I think...

      Not if I leave my basket at the end of the isle.
      My neighbor would see that & try to intimidate me with his cart rushing towards me.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  14. Messing with the security barrier alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fun with supermarkets and security strips:

    1. If you're in the UK and you've bought region 1 DVDs, look inside the case and you'll most likely find one of those long thin security tags.
    2. Peel off one of those security tags and stick it the underside of a shopping trolley.
    3. Sit back and wait for some unsuspecting shopper to trigger the alarm, when going in nobody will really bat an eyelid, but if they walk out with a trolley load of shopping and it goes off, things will get interesting.
    4. Tag as many shopping trolleys as you can for maximum fun.
    5. ????
    6. Profit!

    1. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      It's much more fun to hide them in the linings of coats of people you don't like :)

    2. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Funny

      I did that to a friend of mine when I was in college. The library had an alarm system in place so that books couldn't be taken out of the library without checking them out. A friend of mine worked at the library and gave me a bunch of active strips.

      So I carefully unsewed part of my friend's back pack strap, inserted a strip, and sewed it back together. I also threw some strips in random pockets, just so he'd think it might be over once he found them.

      You could always tell when he was leaving the library. The alarm would go off and he'd yell "FUCK! EVERY FUCKING TIME!"

      I also put one in a friend's shoe. He became quite neurotic.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Technician · · Score: 1

      2. Peel off one of those security tags and stick it the underside of a shopping trolley.
      3. Sit back and wait for some unsuspecting shopper to trigger the alarm, when going in nobody will really bat an eyelid, but if they walk out with a trolley load of shopping and it goes off, things will get interesting.


      It is much more fun to stick them on the bottom of your shoe. Make a quick run into the stor to pick up a single small item such as candy. When they find the tag, you have plausable deniability. You must have stepped on it somewhere in the store. It can keep them busy for a while hunting for the tag and reviewing the security video.

      The best place to get the stickers is from flea market items. they are in many packages besides DVD's and such. Electronics, watches, books, handbags, and such are likely to carry the tags. The tags are not de-activated in most cases. Have fun. Don't repeat the same store often, they will remember you after a while.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, around here nobody seems to bother when the alarm goes off as you walk out the door. Everytime I see it they just keep going like it doesn't apply to them and nobody seems to notice. I think those things are now like car alarms, just annoyances.

    5. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno about your grocery stores, but here they go off all the time. The guy (or gal) pushing the cart stops, looks surprised for a moment, and the security guard gives 'em a handwave, and they're off. Excessive false alarms will ruin any security system...

      AC

    6. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by smaddox · · Score: 1

      For once, I actually know what the ??? is:

      1. Collect underpants and put in shirt/pants.

      2. Follow someone with a tag on their cart through the door. When the alarm goes off, they wont bother check you, if even the other guy. Sell the items.

      3. Profit!

    7. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I used to have one in my wallet-- It came in a CD from a store that didn't use the system. I was surprised how often I got away with it. If you just keep walking like you own the place, nobody bats an eye (of course, it does help that the alarm goes nuts when I walk in as well).

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    8. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      5. Offer to fix the scanner for a small fee.
      6. Sever the power supply.
      7. Profit! (plus happiness from shoppers and checkout chicks alike!)

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    9. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      I think to get the strips in without the alarms going off you use the same technique as shoplifters, create a 'booster bag' (essentially a faraday cage) by lining the inside of the bag with tin foil. Then you could sneak some security tags in and stick them to random items in the store, provided you can do it without the cameras seeing what you're up to.

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    10. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Technician · · Score: 1

      The guy (or gal) pushing the cart stops, looks surprised for a moment, and the security guard gives 'em a handwave, and they're off.

      Often supermarkets don't take the time to turn the packages over to find and de-activate all the tags. Most supermarket items are too low of a value to tag. The result is the clerk spends little time de-activating the tags. This is most common in stores which have self checkout lanes as the consumer has little knowledge on de-activating tags. Items in the supermarket not de-activated includes boxed items of higher value such as nutrition suppliments, baby formula, vitamines, and other likely to be concealed items.

      Once you have the active tags, head over to your local electronics/computer store. They don't ignore tags.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    11. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't get a hold of unused security strips, consider hiding "embarassing" books in your victim's backpack ("Herpes and You", "Am I a Pedophile?", etc.) The fun starts when your friend triggers the alarm and the librarian finds the victim's stolen goods. Of course the librarian will smile and be understanding of the victim's desire to steal this books as opposed to check them out, adding to the embarassement.

    12. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Toonol · · Score: 1
      I often set off those alarms. I've tried leaving as much behind as possible, leaving phone and watch in the car, but they still catch me walking in and out of the store. Barnes & Noble and Toys-R-Us, especially. I wonder if it's because I have a metal plate surgically installed in my forearm, holding my shattered wrist together?

      Is that possible? I can't get even high-power magnets to stick to my arm, so I think the damn thing is non-magnetic.

    13. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by DrScotsman · · Score: 1

      1. If you're in the UK and you've bought region 1 DVDs, look inside the case and you'll most likely find one of those long thin security tags.

      Off topic, but does anyone know why those tags are bundled with all region 1 DVDs?

    14. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by anubi · · Score: 1
      You are probably referring to the "Sensormatic EAS" (Electronic Article Surveillance ) tag.

      Google "Sensormatic EAS tag" for more info if you wanna. Lots of hits.

      Its cheap, and quite reliable. Works on magnetic resonance, which doubles in frequency if the tag is in the magnetized ( armed ) state. The coils by the door try to "ring" the tag, and from the response, determine if it is an armed or unarmed tag.

      These are quite small, and are quite easily put inside product packaging by the manufacturer.

      Hacker's Note:

      I've been making compasses out of these tags, as the magnetic material is quits "snappy", and its quite easy to build an oscillator which uses the tag as a core for the inductor. External magnetic bias supplied by the Earth will influence the duty cycle of the oscillator.

      They are also handy to put on my cat's collar, and build my own detector coil ( simple swept spectrum analyzer/AVR microcontroller) to detect when its MY cat at the hatch. This will work as long as I keep this to myself and my neighbors don't tag their cat too, but its not my neighbor's cat I am at odds with, its that dammm rat, possum, snake, and coon I wanna keep out of my house.

      57 Khz/114 Khz.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    15. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Store censors don't detect magnetic metals. They look for conductive ones which resonate at a certain frequency. Metals used for bones are titanium, BTW.

    16. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I was surprised how often I got away with it.


      I never can figure out why people get all guilty-acting and concerned when they set the alarm off with an item the cashier failed to de-activate. For starters, if you just keep walking nobody bothers to do anything about it, and they didn't do anything wrong...

      When did we all become programmed to believe that we should be submissive to anybody who cares to claim authority over us?
    17. Re:Messing with the security barrier alarms by adolf · · Score: 1

      I never understood that, either.

      I've ranted at length about it here in the past, but the point is simple: There is no law requiring anyone to stop, just for setting off a door alarm on the way out of the store. There is also no law permitting them to force anyone to stop.

      It's not so much that nobody wants to be bothered with doing anything about it, but rather that all but the dumbest of them realize that they're already defeated and powerless, long before the alarm actually goes off.

  15. *shrugs* by morari · · Score: 1

    You may have noticed... No, I can't say that I have.
    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  16. Funny or sick? You decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd much prefer if supermarket pranksters stuck to less annoying pranks, like hiding a speakerphone and ketchup bags in a baby-less baby-holder, having it play "crying" sounds, and then publicly "beating" the "baby" until it "bleeds". It's all fun and games until some public-minded guy hauls you off the "baby" and beats you to within an inch of your life...

    Reminds me somewhat of this quote from bash.org-

    cag URL tara: When I was in high school, the school board decided that the biology students had to pay for the fetal pigs that were being dissected. After the course was done, my friend Amy demanded that she be allowed to take the pig, since she had paid for it. There was some WTF from the school, but she got her pig. That weekend, she and her brother dressed the pig up in some baby clothes and a blanket, drove down the street and lit a smoke bomb in the car. They were passing a couple walking down the street when Amy leaned out of the car and yelled "Save my baby" and tossed the pig at the couple. They were doing about 50 mph so she missed the couple. The baby/pig hit the sidewalk, skidded along the concrete, shedding parts and limbs before it impacted a mailbox.

    She said she had never seen such a horrified look in her life. I mean, yeah, it's funny, and I hate to say that I laughed at it a lot (and still keep doing so whenever I read it), but at the same time I'm thinking that they should have been locked up for doing something that would have been quite the opposite of funny- if not downright traumatic- for the pedestrians.
    1. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't worry, it's only a matter of time before doing something which is "traumatic" to another adult is reason enough to lock someone up. Our society is turning into a bunch of cry babies who are "traumatized" by just about everything, so that will mean everyone will be in jail.

      Oh wait, never mind, we're all treated like inmates anyway.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might believe that urban legend, except that I also dissected fetal pigs in high school bio. They're not big enough to pass for a human baby; more like the size of your hand.

    3. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by TheLink · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fetal pigs are tiny, but if a human was hit by say a 2kg pig at 50mph, that human could get significantly hurt.

      --
    4. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by Lavene · · Score: 2, Funny

      * Too many replies [slashdot.org] beneath your current threshold. Argh! Why do I keep falling for that??? And I'm not even new here...
    5. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, it's only a matter of time before doing something which is "traumatic" to another adult is reason enough to lock someone up. Calling a woman alone at night and threatening to rape her (regardless of whether you actually meant it or not) would be "traumatic". It would also likely (and justifiably) to get you locked up were you caught.

      Okay; I'm making a point about your argument- and I was exaggerating that they should be locked up for the "baby" pig thing. That having been said, if someone was genuinely fooled into thinking a baby had been killed in a horrific manner as a result of a car accident, you're damn right I can believe that would be traumatic for some people- and from that perspective, I'd be considerably less indulgent of the prank.
    6. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Argh! Why do I keep falling for that??? And I'm not even new here... Yes you are, Seven Figures boy. ;-)
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yup, and that's exactly the point I was making. People who are so easy traumatized are the problem. Toughen up.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:Funny or sick? You decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who are so easy traumatized are the problem. Toughen up. You're saying that people shouldn't be traumatised by the death of a child in that manner? You sick fuck.
  17. other applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finally i can shop without worrying about rogue carts hitting my car

  18. This could make shopping a lot more interesting by computerman413 · · Score: 1

    It's bad enough your computer could lock up. Now your shopping cart? How exciting will this be?

    1. Re:This could make shopping a lot more interesting by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      I'll be really neurotic when my shopping trolley blue screens on me...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  19. Don't speak too loudly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I can already see the law&order freaks to demand something like that in every car so the cops needn't pull you over but can simply stop you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Don't speak too loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Police organizations are already talking about it. Most of the basics of such a system are already in place with modern vehicles, it would just take a law and some tweaking with the main computer. Of course, it wouldn't work on older vehicles (unless you're talking about something more drastic such as EMP), so it would take some time for it to be useful.

      Here's a Guardian article discussing it

    2. Re:Don't speak too loudly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Don't speak too loudly by Original+Replica · · Score: 1
      --
      We are all just people.
    4. Re:Don't speak too loudly by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      That's an ignition immobilizer. That could be something sophisticated like a LoJack system, or as simple as my factory alarm's ignition disable - you can't start the car without unlocking the doors with the clicker or the right key.

    5. Re:Don't speak too loudly by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      The systems all seem to use RF to talk between the key fob and the system in the car.

      Although I'm sure the key fob transmitter is low power, that doesn't mean you couldn't trigger it with a more powerful transmitter, from further away...you'd need to build some mechanism into the receiver in order to make it addressable (so you wouldn't knock out all the cars on the road, although I suppose that would be an interesting feature as well), but as long as you've got everyone wiring a black box into critical parts of their car, why not?

      Not saying that's necessarily what they're up to, and I gather the Canucks seem to have a...different degree...of trust in their government than I do down here, but if the government told me that I must install a radio-controlled device into the ignition system of my car, and gave me only five models to choose from, made by three obscure companies that I'd never heard of ... I'd be suspicious.

      IIRC, there were some proposals back in the 80s/early-90s for systems that would use EMP-like technologies to disable cars remotely during chases; the most ridiculous one that I remember was a device mounted on a police car that shot a large manhole-sized device, frisbee-style, under the car it was pursuing, which would produce some sort of pulse as it passed under the engine, disabling the car. Seemed like a hell of a long shot to me, but it was attractive enough during the height of the crack/crime epidemic to get some people interested, apparently. I never heard anything about it again, so I'm thinking that it was vaporware. Although not that long ago there was an article here on Slashdot about some sort of "sticky" car-tracker that the police could use to tag cars during pursuits and use like an involuntary Lo-Jack -- that seems a lot more feasible.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  20. sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. nerdy does not imply not-asshole
    2. this was not actually designed by a competent engineer. a competent engineer would have put the transmit coil in an lc circuit tuned to the right frequency and thus made it way more powerful while consuming way less electricity. this is essentially an electric heater that radiates a small magnetic field.

    1. Re:sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me how often I see this "Slashdotter thinks he's a genius but makes himself look like a complete idiot" thing happen. Please sit in the corner until you figure out why you're wrong.

    2. Re:sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you'll explain why that is for all us hardware hacking ignoramuses?

  21. Boots on shopping carts? Where are those used? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've never seen one of these in use on the west coast of the US. Sounds kind of strange - why shouldn't you be able to take a shopping cart outside? Do you just have to eat all your groceries at the store, or only buy as much as you can carry at one time?

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    1. Re:Boots on shopping carts? Where are those used? by AdmNaismith · · Score: 3, Informative

      These systems are used to keep people from taking carts past the store parking lot. Generally there is a painted line indicating how far you can go before the 'boot' will activate.
      I don't understand how I keep seeing K-mart trolleys miles and miles from the nearest K-mart, but it explains the need for the 'boot' system.

    2. Re:Boots on shopping carts? Where are those used? by nonsequitor · · Score: 2, Informative

      They use them at the edge of the parking lots, like an electric fence, to keep homeless people from stealing the carts. It reduces the amount of shopping carts they need to replace each year and saves the store money.

    3. Re:Boots on shopping carts? Where are those used? by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      It has to do with how far you can take the cart from the store, since people who live close enough to walk have been known to take the carts home with them and keep them. Then there's the case of the assholes last night: They ran the cart as fast as they could and released it...out into traffic.

    4. Re:Boots on shopping carts? Where are those used? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you live in the rural areas of Oregon, but these are all over California. The limit is in the outer areas of the parking lot (thus the "yellow line" in the article), not the store doorways. It works too, the homeless just move on till they find a store without the protection.

    5. Re:Boots on shopping carts? Where are those used? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      They use them at the edge of the parking lots, like an electric fence, to keep homeless people from stealing the carts.
      There's a grocery store in Hoboken NJ with a bar directly across from the parking lot. It's quite nice of the bar to have outside seating, we got there early to make sure we had a good view the day that they activated the boots at that grocery store.

      Classic entertainment for hours, that was.

      One thing I thought interesting, though, was that it wasn't the homeless who were taking the carts, nor the old people (who typically had their own little mini-cart thingies) -- it was the young and lazy. Very funny to see a pumped up 22-year-old who obviously spends hours each week sculpting his upper body get totally pwned by a shopping cart handle to the gut.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  22. DMCA VIOLATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously a blatant violation of the DMCA provisions against reverse engineering a property protection scheme.

  23. Locking was done differently in Australia by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We didn't need some fancy electronic locking device to stop trolleys leaving the car park (translation to American: carts leaving the parking lot)

    Instead each trolley stacked up in the waiting area had a small mechanical lock that attached a pin to the trolley in front by a chain. In order to release the next trolley in line you had to insert a $1 coin, which was retained in the lock. When you finished using your trolley, you locked it back up again and your coin was returned. No high faluting electronics, a built in incentive to return the trolley, and no mysterious lockups.

    Of course trolley wheels have been designed since day one to lock up without any fancy electronics inside them ..

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a dollar, I'll take the $800 cart home, thanks.

    2. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low-tech solutions like that are all very well. They're cheap and functional. But what they don't do is create work for the high-tech industry.

      I don't know for sure, but I'd be prepared to bet that the trolley-locking "shoe" was developed either with public money, or with support from a particular supermarket chain whose CEO happened to be friends with the head of an electronics company...

      As for the poster who wants to take home an $800 trolley - for that sort of money, I'd be prepared to lift the damn' thing and carry it a couple of metres over the locking line.

    3. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Thng · · Score: 1

      I've seen the "deposit" for a cart done in Canada, too. The reason it probably hasn't caught on in the US is that there is no widely circulated dollar coin. The Sakakawea dollar hardly counts.

    4. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Me too. Can't be leaving that pile of other peoples' junk that I spent all week collecting round town just lying around out the front.

    5. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      I have seen those in the US, primarily in airports where you can "rent" a stroller or cart and then return it for the majority of your deposit back.

      As for a supermarket... that would be so incredibly inconvinient that I would never shop there. I rarely have $1 bills on me, let alone a $1 coin. If I could quickly swipe my credit card, that would be a little better.

      But it also means you have to walk the cart back to a station to get your deposit back. Not exactly convinience.

      --
      -David
    6. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by chgros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a dollar, I'll take the $800 cart home, thanks.
      And what will you do with it?
      The system is not so much designed to prevent cart theft as it is as an incentive for people to put carts back in their place (not all countries have minimum wages as low as the US so they can't afford to pay people to do that)

    7. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      I hate this system! Very often I don't have a gold coin on me, forcing me to haul my stuff around in those too-small plastic baskets.

    8. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Problem with that though, is that I've always thought $1 or $2 a bargain for one of those trolleys.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    9. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by deniable · · Score: 1

      You'd think that was idiot proof. It wasn't. We saw all kinds of stupid ways for people to put them back. It was also dick-head bait.

      The worst case was when we helped someone else get her dollar back and then had to make a 3d sculpture to get ours. I can't remember what the previous moron did.

      The system got pulled and the trolley boys were happy. The only system I currently see in Perth is the system in TFA.

    10. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by ross.w · · Score: 1

      The mechanism is very simple. You only need a disc shape in any material that is the same size as a $1 or $2 coin. Keep it in your wallet for those unexpected supermarket trips.

      When the Coles shopping centre at Kellyville Ridge opened with this system, they gave away keyrings with a plastic token inside that could be used instead of a $1 coin.

      This works because the coin is trapped in the trolley you are using and you get the same one back again.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    11. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

      The same is done in most (all?) European countries. You even get keyhangers specialy designed to act like a coin, so you do not need your change.

      I went to a store and needed change, instead they gave me two plastic coins I can use. I leave them in my car and use them whenever I go shopping.

      One disadvantage: after the introduction of the Euro, it is not very clear what coin to use. It varies between 50cent, 1 and 2 EUR coins. Sometimes all three, other stores just one.

      I rarely see carts. Apparently people are more interested in the little money then in the cart itself. I also see not many homeless people, so the demand for carts is a bit lower perhaps then in the states.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      We use the same thing at the Real and Wal Marts here in Germany. Insert one euro, get a cart. Put your cart back, get the euro back.

    13. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      He's Australian.
      He would have made a barbecue out of it. I guess.
      But ther's lot's of other options

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    14. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what will you do with it?

      ... Are you telling me that you have /never/ seen a homeless person pushing a cart around?

    15. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The incentive here is to return the trolleys to where they are supposed to go rather than leave them spread all over the carpark. If you're going to remove the trolley from the carpark, you can get your $1 back with a paperclip or hammer once you're out of sight of store security, so there is no incentive there.

    16. Re:Locking was done differently in Australia by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Well, they just opened a new Coles by Southern Cross Station, but I didn't see them handing out any of these things. Have any suggestions for a cheap alternative that fits the slot?

  24. Do I smell... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a new gadget for sale at ThinkGeek in the forseeable future? :)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. All done with magnets! by hack++slash · · Score: 1

    My local supermarket has gone extremely low-tech with trying to stop the casual trolley thief (ie chav scum kids), one of the wheels of each trolley has a magnetic triggered brake and the pedestrian entrances to the grounds have a bunch of magnets embedded into the concrete.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:All done with magnets! by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a bad place to drop your PDA, phone or credit cards...

    2. Re:All done with magnets! by orangepeel · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what if you have a pacemaker, and you're really, really short?

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    3. Re:All done with magnets! by karnal · · Score: 2, Funny

      But what if you have a pacemaker, and you're really, really short? Maybe you could make some money at the circus?
      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:All done with magnets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have one of those floppy-disk powered PDAs? Mine doesn't have a problem around magnets.

    5. Re:All done with magnets! by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      In my defence it was silly o'clock in the morning.

  26. exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That exists in some new cars already, remote engine stop. They can lock (they advertise "unlock") the doors on you for that matter.

  27. Instructables? by Randseed · · Score: 1

    From a quick scan of the site, it looks like ths is the most intelligent thing on the entire place. Other projects include "Boobs in a Box," and a straight hookup of a piezo-electric buzzer called "The Headache Machine" with some retard commenting in bad English that it seems "really hard to make."

    1. Re:Instructables? by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      agreed. the site is shit. it's like the youtube of diy, only much much worse.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  28. Ridiculously complicated solution! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    WTF! Over 20 parts and hours of work to do *this*? All you need is a recording of the tones and $34 car CD player. No programming, soldering, or microcomputers required.

  29. Why doing these things by Tech by kentsin · · Score: 1

    Oh, funny isnt it?

    Why people try to do every thing by Tech? Why not some other way that proven effective?

    Ethic, Law?

    Are people lost faith with them? Or thec make them dead stuipd?

  30. Re:Ridiculously complicated solution! by Technician · · Score: 1

    WTF! Over 20 parts and hours of work to do *this*? All you need is a recording of the tones and $34 car CD player. No programming, soldering, or microcomputers required.

    I was thinking even more descreet. A car CD player is a little strange to be carrying about with a battery. A better deal would be an I-pod with an amplified speaker amplifier with a tuned coil. The tuned coil will cut the power requirement greatly. The mp3 player is deniable as a hack device. The amp is for speakers, Duh, and the loop is an am radio antenna. Most non technical security folks won't be able to see it for what it is.

    Building a loop on the end of a walking cane could prove fun.
    When you return your cart in the parking lot, drop an item and have it roll under the carts. Use your cane to retrieve it. Wait for them to pick up the row of carts to return them to the store entrance...

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  31. A Better Target by iamnafets · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think a better target would be the vibrating coasters that signal "your table is ready". If you could somehow set up all of those to go off at the same time on a Friday night you might...have them all going off at the same time on a Friday night! Drive-by mayhem!

  32. Mod parent funny! by whativewanted · · Score: 1

    hilarious

  33. But, but, but... by TodMinuit · · Score: 1

    Ethic, Law? You don't get it: It's ethical hacking! *ducks*
    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
  34. Charming by Le+Marteau · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Senseless vandalism. Swell. How laudable. Life is tough enough, but how about locking up some wage-earner's cart, after he has suffered under the hands of a sadistic boss, just wanting to get some grub and go home. Delightful.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:Charming by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      I laughed out loud picturing the scene, but then I'd never do this for real. That's why I write fiction - I get to cause all the mayhem and fun I want, without hurting anyone else.

    2. Re:Charming by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Life is tough enough, but how about locking up some wage-earner's cart
      It's OK. I only do this prank to salary or commission-earners.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:Charming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? It will make me feel good! Up your ass! FUCK YOU.

    4. Re:Charming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you...

      do you need a hug?

  35. Non-Commercial? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    Just how many non-commercial uses are there for cart locking systems, anyhow?

  36. is this really a solution? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    can the cost of putting a remote control boot, sensors, transmitters etc. really cheaper than losing some carts?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  37. Must be Slashdotted... by Announcer · · Score: 1

    The majority of the links on the site (pictures, etc.) are now coming up "Unavailable" or 404 errors. It's lying to us... apparently it doesn't know how to say "I can't take it anymore!!!"

    --
    Willie...
  38. Bubbles will be thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just give Bubbles some money to build the device and he'll be selling them back to his heart's content.

    Unless Ricky goes and fucks it up as usual. That dumb bastard.

  39. Re:is this really a solution?: YES, it is. by VidEdit · · Score: 4, Informative

    "can the cost of putting a remote control boot, sensors, transmitters etc. really cheaper than losing some carts?" Obviously, yes, that is why stores pay big bucks for these systems. Remember, they don't just lose a few carts, they lose all of them one at a time. They have to hire people to cruz neighborhoods looking for them and bring them back. Those they do find are often worse for the wear. Ones they don't find wind up rusting in creeks and abandoned, broken in alleys and fallow yards. Locking shopping carts help prevent neighborhoods from being littered with these abandoned carts brought home on one-way trips by people who can't be bothered to buy a "granny cart." The addition of locks to my local shopping center's carts has quickly eliminated those carts from being strewn about by people walking home with groceries. The newer systems are much better than earlier iterations that use purely mechanical devices triggered by small "speed bump" like berms which rimmed the parking lot. These new systems are more reliable and have fewer false triggers--well, until now :-) Note, I support walking to the store but I don't support stealing the cart just because it is convenient to push home--and no, most of those people pushing carts home are not fragile elderly people, at least not in my area, so that isn't the issue. And no, nobody ever takes them back, either. If they did, it wouldn't be as big a deal.

    --
  40. No degree needed. by Whammy666 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This ain't rocket science. You don't need a CPU to do this, let alone a PCB board. Doesn't anybody know how to build stuff using discrete logic anymore? Eesh. I could have built this on a perfboard when I was 15.

    --
    When all else fails, run.
    1. Re:No degree needed. by Vampos+DeCampos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but come to think of it, I'd probably use a microcontroller too. Low part count and cheap enough; I can get an attiny13 for about $1.7 where I live.

    2. Re:No degree needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, someone thinking like a real engineer instead of a naive ass. Also consider the value of reprogrammability when breaking and adapting to new codes and schemes.

    3. Re:No degree needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always someone out to prove his beard is the longest.

  41. Re:Ridiculously complicated solution! by csboyer · · Score: 1

    The system works by using E&M waves near the frequency of sound, not sound waves. So an audio version of the signal will not do anything. Sound and Radio waves are different.

  42. Just wait until the next snowstorm... by R2.0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And all the bread and toilet paper is MINE! ALL MINE!!!

    MUAHaHahahahah!!

    (Gotta credit my wife with this one - she's truly evil)

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Just wait until the next snowstorm... by hack++slash · · Score: 2, Funny

      "And all the bread and toilet paper is MINE! ALL MINE!!!"

      Now that's a recipe for shit sandwiches.

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  43. Why is this needed? by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Aldi's uses a "deposit" with their carts, you put a quarter in to unlock it from the rack and get the quarter back when you return the cart. The parking lots I have seen are always clear of carts, it seems like a cost effective way to manage them, its a simple mechanical lock.

    I guess something like this would be needed in area's where homeless take carts on regular basis but then arent we just treating side effects rather than addressing the actual problem?

    1. Re:Why is this needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have _carts_ at your Aldi? Man, I must live in a dump.

  44. Something I don't get by lena_10326 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why didn't they just build the device to always lock when there's no signal? A transmitter in the store emits a continuous signal that keeps the wheels unlocked. When you take it out of the parking lot and go out of signal range, the wheels lock up.

    Seems a bit more prank proof that way.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
    1. Re:Something I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then some guy invents a reliable RF canceler and goes down in history. :)

    2. Re:Something I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't they just build the device to always lock when there's no signal? Because you can't have a signal everywhere. It's called fading and there is little that can be done about it.

    3. Re:Something I don't get by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Fire Hazard. If there were an emergency and the power went out, the last thing you want is haphazarly placed immobile objects (in the dark, no less) slowing you down on your way out the door.

    4. Re:Something I don't get by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Fire Hazard. If there were an emergency and the power went out, the last thing you want is haphazarly placed immobile objects (in the dark, no less) slowing you down on your way out the door.
      A lot of stores already have physical barriers in front of the doors with gaps too narrow for the cart, but wide enough for patrons to fit through (well, most people anyway), which can already clog up with abandoned carts, so avoiding a fire hazard isn't priority one.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  45. More useful? by griffjon · · Score: 1

    an UN-locker, so that when I'm parked at the edge of the damned lot and the cart freezes up 20' from said edge where transmitter is, I don't have to shuttle the bags from the stuck cart to my car while blocking traffic and having a cart that I can't reasonably get back into a cart-pen?

    Just a thought. I HATE these things.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    1. Re:More useful? by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      Just drag the cart. It's not that hard.

    2. Re:More useful? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      Sure, that's an option - but I'd prefer if the store didn't treat me like a thief in the first place.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    3. Re:More useful? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why don't you go back in, complain to a manager, and make him send a lackey out to drag your cart back to your car? Grocery stores are highly motivated to keep their regular customers happy, and they can't fix something they don't know about.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  46. Re:Ridiculously complicated solution! by ishtvan222 · · Score: 1

    I have made it work with an mp3 player and a coil of wire on a ferrous core. The range is no where near theirs, but its easy and it works. http://www.instructables.com/id/ENSDA1VF3KLNVD9/

  47. Re:is this really a solution?: YES, it is. by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    It really is a big problem for surrounding neighborhoods, like you said. There's a low-rent highrise apt bldg near a grocery store in my area that was fined by the Fire Dept a few years ago because there were so many abandoned grocery carts clogging up the hallways. Just another example of reality being weirder than fiction!

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  48. Shopping carts are parts of the culture!.. by mi · · Score: 5, Funny

    The carts are part of the culture.

    The system is grossly skewed towards the interest of the cart-owners, who abuse their control over the implements.

    We have the right to take the carts away for our convenience (fair use) — and it is not "stealing", because we always plan to bring them back some day. It is stupid and unethical for the supermarkets to fight their customers over this, especially the single mothers (who have never gone shopping) among them.

    SMAA (SuperMarket Association of America) and similar oppressive institutions world-wide will, no doubt, try to suppress this new invention, so all freedom-fighters must start mirroring the just released information on their computers.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Shopping carts are parts of the culture!.. by anubi · · Score: 1
      That was a funny read... I would have modded you funny too.

      But all in all, I do feel for the shopkeeper who has to go all over town retriving his carts.

      I live in Southern California, and I see it every day. People visit every store in town and walk the carts home, then abandon them. The carts are then used by children as toys on the neighborhood streets, and are often relieved of their wheels as the children construct other playthings from them.

      What's a shopkeeper to do?

      If he does not have carts, people will avoid his business.

      If he does have carts, people take them, and he loses a $200 cart for a ten dollar sale.

      To me, this whole article should be taken in the light of "this is how the technology works".

      Yes, any one of us can foul it up.

      Any one of us can put superglue in locks too.

      But what does that prove?

      Its nice to know how technologies work.

      But that does not justify us making an ass of ourselves.

      If we get caught, I expect the same treatment as I would expect them to give anyone who gets csught sugaring my car's gas tank. Simply, I want the book thrown at them.

      I expect nothing less, and I hold fast a shopkeeper's right to expect nothing less either.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  49. Carrot and Stick by danocorno · · Score: 1

    The owners of the shopping carts install these devices to keep the buggies from leaving the store or parking lot. This method of clamping the wheels is a negative approach; punishing those who stray with the carts. A more positive system is used in The Netherlands. Shoppers in Dutch supermarkets must insert a quarter in to the cart lock to release it from the cluster of other carts. If they want their quarter back, then they must return the cart to the cart rack. Sure, some may scoff at the quarter, but the procedure seems to work in Holland; citizens dutifully return the carts to the store after use. Maybe in the States, a dollar coin could be used as enticement. Perhaps dangling a carrot (money) in front of patrons is better then beating them with a stick (wheel clamp).

    1. Re:Carrot and Stick by CyberTech · · Score: 1

      "Sure, some may scoff at the quarter, but the procedure seems to work in Holland; citizens dutifully return the carts to the store after use." "Maybe in the States, a dollar coin could be used as enticement. " While I don't disagree that using a deposit method would tend to stop the casual person from "just using it to walk home"; it's not going to stop homeless people from buying a $0.25 - $1.00 wagon for their gear :) Also... some may collect them, but I can count the # of dollar coins I've carried in my life as less than my age, for sure. They're mainly used for gifts for children, collections, etc in the US.

      --
      -- CyberTech
  50. wtf??? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    1. nerdy does not imply not-asshole
    Please don't ever not fail to do that again. Double negatives make my tired, overworked little brain hurt.
    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  51. Only if they're not deactivated. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately I cant think of a good source for active ones inside the store without ripping open DVDs or something. I work in the photo dept and when i put new models on the camera bar, the security strip is frequently loose inside the battery dept. I always take it out, peel off the backing and stick it on the bottom of a cart. Probably a good dozen carts have em now, its always funny to see a stockman bring in a long train of carts and set off the alarm. Its great because theres no way to deactivate them without running them over the registers and nobody has the time to search the underside of all the carts or test them in the alarm one by one.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  52. Re:is this really a solution?: YES, it is. by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds cheaper to domesticate humans properly in the first place.

    --
  53. Dumb idea by Animats · · Score: 1

    It's a shopping cart. Do you expect a cryptographic handshake on the security system?

    A more serious low-end security problem is dumb garage door opener systems. Too many of those can be opened by cycling through all the codes quickly.

  54. Really dangerous by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

    This can be really dangerous if a child is in the shopping cart, it's in a parking lot, and the cart is being pushed across a lane of traffic with approaching traffic when the cart pusher thought there was plenty of time to get across.

    1. Re:Really dangerous by jkerman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps strapping little billy into a heavy cart with radio controlled magnetic brakes isnt the smartest idea no matter how many instructions are posted.

    2. Re:Really dangerous by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

      What instructions?

    3. Re:Really dangerous by lewko · · Score: 1

      The trolley wheels won't lock up, inside the parking lot. They shouldn't be able to get outside the parking lot in order to wheel junior across eight lanes of highway.

      On the other hand, if you are giving junior the trolley ride of his life, at top speed down a ramp, when a Slashdotter fires up his remote trolley-locking device, well then your child might get a flying lesson as well.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  55. Obligatory Rocky Horror Picture Show remark by monkeyboythom · · Score: 1

    "My wheels! I can't move my wheels!"

    If they really thought about it, I suppose it's some kind of audio-vibratory-physio-molecular transport device?

  56. You might also want to look at this tag abuse... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  57. Homeless communities everywhere are in outrage... by keith134 · · Score: 0

    Am I the first person who has never even heard of this "shopping cart locking" technology? This is gonna piss off a lot of bums in my city... OTOH this technology in the hands of teens could completely redefine wal*mart pranks

  58. (Couldn't resist...) by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe true: no 2 year committment to ATT, but perhaps a 1 year committment in the local state penitentiary :-). Well, this is probably better than to be with ATT, so GO FOR IT!

    Either way, you're going to get fucked.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  59. would have been useful.... by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    it would have been useful to have this a while back when the elevator broke down at a grocery store (safeway) I was at- in order to get to my car I was instructed to take the cart around front when the wheels locked up. There were too many groceries to carry by hand and employees wouldn't help so I was forced to drag the cart around and up a hill which ended up laying out my back. I had to the doctor and was on medications for weeks afterwards (relaxers, anti inflammitories and pain killers. If I would have had an unlocker I could have just unlocked it and saved myself the pain.

    1. Re:would have been useful.... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I thought they only used this wheel-locking system in the US, the paradise of tort-windfalls!

    2. Re:would have been useful.... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You should have screamed at the manager, demanded your money back, and never shopped there again. If you let them treat you like shit, they will.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:would have been useful.... by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      I have refused to shop there since then- the people there seem a lot more lazy than negligent.

  60. Here's some carts to try it on by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Here's some carts ready to try it on.

    (safe for most workplaces)

  61. Been done before... by Techman83 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't know about anywhere else, but our local supermarket has something like this already. Soon as you take it past the yellow line painted around the car park the wheels lock up....

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
    Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
  62. No technical solution to a social problem. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    That is the real issue. That there are people out there willing to wreck havoc with trolleys (or carts).

    And in a typical fashion shops go for the apparently cheaper option: tech instead of social. It is cheaper in the long term to put en electronic break than to have 2 guards at all times in the parking lot.

    The guards would send a strong social message: this is private property, no pranks here.

    The fancy electronic devices say: we don't care, if you can get away with it all the power to you.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  63. There are multiple solutions to this problem. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And not all require gadgetry.

    If people are taking the carts, there is a fucking business model screaming at the shops right there. So put 2 guards in the parking lot to make sure nobody takes the trolleys and request a deposit from anybody taking it home, big enough to want people to bring them back, but low enough not to deter people from using the service.

    On return of the trolley refund most of the money and keep a small fee.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:There are multiple solutions to this problem. by VidEdit · · Score: 1

      "So put 2 guards in the parking lot to make sure nobody takes the trolleys"

      The mechanical system has a huge advantage over guards--lack of confrontation. Customers denied egress with their loaded shopping carts at the edge of the parking lot will get angry at the guards and the store. If the store wants to keep the customers and the carts, the mindless mechanical system is much less confrontational--no one to get mad at, argue with, yell at or hit.

      As to guards, 2 guards just to patrol for shopping carts, full time is a huge cost--especially for 24 hour grocery stores. That's 336 man hours per week, 52 weeks a year, or about $175, 000 (at 7 dollars per hour plus employment taxes and such for an estimate of $10/hr). I'm guessing that the the locking system is the better deal in the long run.

      --
  64. Step 11... is where things get interesting by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    we have hot geek girl acquired... sadly with face out of shot we cannot determine just HOW hot...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  65. But.... Re:Oh Great by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is the ideal place to find snot nosed kids will EE degrees.

  66. But think of the children! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Terrorist scould use this system to cause havoc. Just imagine if they set one of these devices off at a supermarket and then everyone's trolley would stop. The devestation would be horrific as people get hit in the stomach by their trolley handles. Some people might even end up with nasty bruises! Not only that, but they could steal the trolleys and make someof the wheels even more wobbly than usual.

    Terror weapons like this should be bannned before its to late.

  67. Obligatory..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    All your cart are belong to us!

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  68. Was already done for Colruyt shop in Brussels by scapor · · Score: 1

    CS students of VUB University of Brussels did this same thing some years ago for the shopping carts in the local Colruyt shop. AFAIK it was also released in the wild.

  69. Re:Ridiculously complicated solution! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    I left out the bit about using a coil of wire instead of a speaker. I just assumed all SD readers could figure that out.

  70. NL has both systems by Animaether · · Score: 1

    the coin to unlock the cart from the one in front of it at the 'cart queue'

    and

    the lock on the wheel if you try and take it outside of a particular perimeter.

    the first is, as somebody else said, to encourage you to bring the darn thing back to a queue. It saves them work and every other shopper a stray cart. You, in return, get your coin / keyring token back. It never picked up much in the U.S. because everybody there is so accustomed to service. Your groceries get bagged -for- you. They get brought to your car -for- you. If you leave a stray cart.. no problem, some poor $3/hour sap will return it -for- you. Not saying that the service is a bad thing... hey, it employs another few kids, and still your products are cheaper than in the EU, so it can't be all bad. But I find not returning a shopping cart to be little above the level of people leaving their junk at a theatre because somebody else will come along and clean it up for you anyway. What's wrong with you that you find that enough reason to -not- just take your trash with you and drop it in the next bin along your way (of which there are plenty in a theatre). Anyway, I'll stop ranting and move on with...

    The latter is purely to help prevent theft. And yes, carts cost a shitload to make - you'd think that just being bits of metal wire or even cast plastic they'd be as cheap as the next childrens' toy. Nuh-uh. They go well over a hundred euros. It's insane.

    As for the story.. yay, another prankster.. ha ha. *yawn*

  71. ASDA in the UK (Walmart) by drspliff · · Score: 2

    The ASDA brand of super markets (Walmart owned) has had these for ages at the end of the walkways & store carparks.

    It's amazing how many older people I've seen caught out by this because they need assistance to get their shopping to their car or to the bus. A few times I've seen ASDA attendants dragging the locked trolley for them instead of waiting 5 minutes to get somewbody out to unlock it.

    In theory it works, in practice people just carry the trolley over fences to stop it being locked up while people with disabilities or frail people end up being given a hard time.

    It's like DRM but for shopping trolleys :D

  72. that is why by derjames · · Score: 0

    I use the shopping baskets provided...

  73. Mod parent up (for roadkilling the maple bacon) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I needed a good laugh this morning, and by golly that was it!

  74. fossil record by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

    My brother and I used to go fossil hunting in a local creekbed. One weekend we counted no fewer than 14 shopping carts spread over half a mile of creek, most buried deeply in the gravel and mud. They were all from the same grocery store, in a middle- to low-income neighborhood. An employee of that store told me the carts cost $400 each to replace.

  75. Spread the good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a great way to spread the message of Open Source. Terrorism.

  76. I *have* seen this in use in the US. by argent · · Score: 1

    It's got two additional bonuses:

    * You don't get carts left between cars and loose in the parking lot.

    * You get neighborhood kids corralling the few carts that do stray and bringing them back for the quarters.

  77. coin return carts by Shirlockc · · Score: 1

    We've had them for years in Canada, stick a quarter in the slot and release the cart. Bring the cart back and get your quarter back. Very few carts ever go missing or leave the store property. I don't know why it's not like that in the States.

    1. Re:coin return carts by bratwiz · · Score: 1


      Have you seen the price of gas lately? Or the increased property taxes? Or the latest toll hikes to supposedly fund new roads (like that's ever going to happen), or the increased cost of food, fuel, hvac, and evetything else.... who has a quarter?

  78. On the fence by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

    On one hand, I don't think things like this should be censored, it's a pretty cool even though it's sole purpose is to annoy a bunch of strangers.

    My real concern is not even so much that someone would get hurt from a cart stopping abruptly (though that could certainly happen), is more what would happen if someone notices someone with an electrical device strapped to their body. That could end badly, seems far fetched but in a day and age where an LED Mooninite sign can trigger city wide panic, not hard to imagine someone getting popped for what looks like an IED.

    --

    -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    1. Re:On the fence by bratwiz · · Score: 1


      It could cause some serious havok if the cart happened to stop rolling right in front of a car that had only slowed down to let it pass.

    2. Re:On the fence by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      That's definitely a possibility, people drive like idiots, especially in lots, you're talking to someone who got hit in one by SUV while pushing his Dad in a wheelchair (I managed to push him out of the way).

      I guess what I mean by on the fence, is while it's potentially dangerous, a lot of knowledge is. I don't think a lot of people would build these (though I might be wrong), then again, outside of the knowledge of how such systems work, there isn't any real practical value to this instance. Then again, I'm against the dumbing down of people in the name of safety. So, not sure how to feel about it. I could certainly see someone seeing someone wired and causing a stampede too.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  79. Bubbles by pestie · · Score: 1

    "Juuulian! What the fack is up with these shopping carts? They got little facking clampers on 'em and the fackin' wheels don't work!"

    God, I love that show. And God bless Bittorrent, or I'd never have seen anything but a single season of it, censored, on BBC America.

    1. Re:Bubbles by ksheff · · Score: 1

      God, I love that show. And God bless Bittorrent
      I agree. A guy I work with is from NS and that's how I found out about it. I've never seen the BBC America version.
      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  80. Ha ha. Now get a life. by bellylaugh · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, Orthonormal. I am the engineer who designed the CAPS electronics ten years ago. You have "broken into" a really simple, completely unsecured system.

    Please leave the carts unlocked when you are done playing. If you screw them up, you are stealing from stores that don't make much of a profit margin. And from the company (actual human beings) that did something about carts being left all over neighborhoods. They don't make much money, either. Retrieving carts turns out to be a significant expense for stores. There are companies that charge money to pick them up (Which always seemed like a potential protection racket to me.)

    If that's you modeling the system in the instructables article, I'm in love. Brains and beauty.

    As far as "On the one hand, we feel sorry for the engineer who has to figure out why thunderstorms are setting off a byte-encoded trigger for the locking mechanism. On the other hand, HAHAHAHAHAHA!" Sorry, but I had to tell Carttronics LLC about your prank.

  81. Bwahahaha by ruinous · · Score: 1

    The fact that I actually find this funny reassures me that I'm not getting too old just yet.

  82. NonCommercial? More like NonFree. by tepples · · Score: 1

    The only restriction is (as far as I can see) that it not be used in commercial products Making it non-Free. Even though OSI doesn't own a trademark on "open source", the definition of "open source" most widely recognized on Slashdot is that published by OSI, which is based on the free software guidelines in the Debian Social Contract.