Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Stops 'Time', Ends An Era

theoeag writes "Starting in September, you will no longer be able to pick up a landline, payphone, etc and find out what time it is at the beep. AT&T, which has had the service since the 20s, cited a lack of demand in the digital age as the reason for "time"'s extinction. Actually, the service had already stopped in most states, but Nevada and California — with their large rural and unmapped areas — were still holding out, should the lost motorist or weary hiker need to know the time of day. But no more! The "Time Machine", which consisted of two large drum-like devices that contained several audio-tracks and a quite advanced system for syncing up with the caller, will probably end up in a museum, anxiously awaiting the arrival of its cousin: The Pay-Phone."

359 comments

  1. Evil by calvy · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is by far the most evil thing AT&T has done. How can they take time away from us? Gasp

    1. Re:Evil by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I'm still amazed that they actually use the same ancient machines to do it. I mean, dear god, even if the hourly fees and hardware cost were completely jacked up to outrageous levels, you could probably hire a consultant to make an Asterisk-based system with multiple layers of hardware redundancy to do the exact same thing (wait for ring, answer, announce the current time & temperature, then hang up) for less than it probably cost to lease and maintain those old machines for one year...

    2. Re:Evil by sqldr · · Score: 5, Funny

      How can they take time away from us?

      They usually do that by way of their automated call-queueing system.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    3. Re:Evil by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      This is truly a sad day in phone history.

    4. Re:Evil by rwven · · Score: 1

      I remember when I was little, I didn't know that calling the time number cost you $0.50 per call. I thought it was cool and called it 18 times in a row. My dad was pretty ticked when he saw the $9 charge on the phone bill.

  2. Kind of sad by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember listening to this in the early 60's. I thought that it was pretty. Obviously, the current tech surpases that. In fact, You will shortly be able to obtain an atomic clock chip at a "reasonable" price. But the idea of just picking up the phone and getting the tick off was reassuring, esp when we had lost electricity for up to 2 weeks at a time.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Kind of sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes me feel so OLD! :(

    2. Re:Kind of sad by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      That kind of stuff has never bugged me. It was when I was in a store the other day,listening to the muzak and realized that it was stuff from my teens that I was hearing. That was actually funny to realize that the current generation most likely considers it the same way that we would have considered 20's-50's music, that we could hear being piped into the 5 and dime, the movie theatres, or even at the local monky swords.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Kind of sad by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      listening to the muzak and realized that it was stuff from my teens that I was hearing. That's not as bad as when your kids catch you singing to it in the store.
    4. Re:Kind of sad by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was a kid in Miami, early Fifties, the service was known as "the Coca-Cola Lady"...she'd give a one-sentence plug for Coke before announcing the time.

      rj

    5. Re:Kind of sad by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      I was in a store the other day,listening to the muzak and realized that it was stuff from my teens that I was hearing. That was actually funny to realize that the current generation most likely considers it the same way that we would have considered 20's-50's music...

      Not necessarily. I see kids in clubs dancing to some of the same 80s tunes I danced to twenty years ago.

      And hey, with the swing revival, some kids are dancing to 20's-50's music.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:Kind of sad by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      While, I'll agree, it's a nostalgic thing. I can't
      see how tis is really anything. When I'm hiking,
      if I want to know the time. I'll look to the sky to figure it out.
      Any decent hiker should be able to come within 15 minutes
      by checking th sky. If not then, they probably aren't
      very good hikers and shouldn't be out there, causing
      us real hikers problems like having to rescue them from being lost,
      etc.

    7. Re:Kind of sad by Garabito · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact, You will shortly be able to obtain an atomic clock chip at a "reasonable" price

      Yes, and plutonium will be available at every corner drugstore.

    8. Re:Kind of sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because no one makes any good music anymore. Sorry to be the music troll but it makes me sooooo mad that we have to listen to music of yesteryear because this crappy industry stifles ALL innovation. The only good new music is in the underground.

    9. Re:Kind of sad by Klinky · · Score: 1

      I worked for a 411 provider that contracted to wireless and telcos. One of the callers was an old lady with dementia it seemed who'd call and ask about the time a couple times a day. Wouldn't need a number or anything else, just the current time. Of course it cost her like $1.25 per call but someone was paying her bill I guess.

    10. Re:Kind of sad by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      back in the 50's, you could actually call the operator (now 411) and they would kindly give you an accurate time. Hell, in our neck of the woods during the 60's, you could still call the local operator. They were working in McHenry which was just up the road 20 miles. Even funnier was that I dialed a neighbor with 4 digits, while at my grandparents home it was via a party line( shared line). That old gal is probably just remembering what she can.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Kind of sad by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      I was looking into this for a different reason. I was thinking that if we are really going to mars and the moon, we will need a way to accurately land crafts. The only decent way is via a GPS unit. That requires ACCURATE timing. As such an atomic clock is on EVERY GPS sat. Here u go:
      1. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/20177
      2. http://www.aip.org/pnu/2004/split/698-1.html
      3. http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/mini clock.htm
      Sending 40 or more pico sats on a mission that is traveling to mars and luna anyways, that enable communication, vision, and GPS would be well worth it.
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    12. Re:Kind of sad by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      Here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWV_(radio_station) is another oldie service that'll give you accurate time anywhere (Coordinated Universal Time), assuming you have a shortwave receiver.

  3. Inevitable... by nweaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have NNTP, the broadcast atomic clock information, and the cell-phone network, all of which provide exquisitly accurate time to everyone.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Inevitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What does a news server have to do with time?

    2. Re:Inevitable... by Enoxice · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you have an extra 'N' in there somewhere...

      NTP
      NNTP

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    3. Re:Inevitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What does a news server have to do with time?

      With all that porn, who cares what time it is!

    4. Re:Inevitable... by fgaliegue · · Score: 1

      Everyone, huh?

      Everyone is far from being a citizen of a so-called developed country, less much able to own a cell phone, computer or even a watch.

    5. Re:Inevitable... by dashslotter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't care! Calling "time" is like pinging yahoo. Warm fuzzies when you connect....

      --
      I was flipping bits on an abacus, newb.
    6. Re:Inevitable... by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt if someone in a developing country was too poor to own a watch he would be spending his money calling long distance to California, where the service is being stopped, to get the time of day.

    7. Re:Inevitable... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, and as soon as everybody has computers (NTP), clock radios that can tune to WWV or can get it passively (atomic clock) or a cell phone (cell-phone network), then we can get rid of time services over POTS. Until then, it is still the most highly available service out of all of the above.

    8. Re:Inevitable... by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      You have NNTP, the broadcast atomic clock information, and the cell-phone network, all of which provide exquisitly accurate time to everyone. NTP, definitely. Radio-based clocks, sure. GPS time signal, absolutely. But the cell network? I'd never in a million years call that exquisitely accurate. Sometimes I wouldn't even call it reasonably accurate.

      I don't know where they get their time from, but when I look at a cell phone (with network time sync enabled) and it's more than a minute off, I know not to trust it as a reliable time source.
    9. Re:Inevitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Well, technically you can get the time from an NNTP server...

      $ telnet text.usenetserver.com 119
      Trying 208.49.83.83...
      Connected to textfe.usenetserver.com.
      Escape character is '^]'.
      200 text.usenetserver.com -- http://www.usenetserver.com/ (Tornado v1.0.6)
      AUTHINFO USER xxxx
      381 More Authentication Required
      AUTHINFO PASS xxxx
      281 Authentication Accepted
      DATE
      111 20070829151519
      QUIT
      205 GoodBye
      Connection to textfe.usenetserver.com closed by foreign host.
    10. Re:Inevitable... by pjviitas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless you live on Baffin Island...then you need a Seiko Quartz Alpinist.

      Loses about 10 seconds a year.

      Hedghog

    11. Re:Inevitable... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What network is this?

      I know a certain network operator that had to buy a bunch of cesium clocks when they were upgrading from AMPS to TDMA. This was because the T in TDMA stands for "Time", and the timeslice needs minor monkey business when the phone is far from the tower, because of SOL propagation delay. To do TDMA with a sufficiently small slice to be useful, you need VERY accurate clocks.

      And this probably still true today, as GSM is a TDM scheme.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    12. Re:Inevitable... by RubberDuckie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or like 'ping 4.2.2.1'. If that server ever gets eliminated, I will be one unhappy camper.

    13. Re:Inevitable... by rwoodford · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you really need to hear a talking clock, call 202-762-1401. The service is provided by the US Naval Observatory.

    14. Re:Inevitable... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      But funnily enough, it doesn't follow that the display on a cell phone would be synced to that fancy-pants clock. It could just as easily be synced to cletus the intern sending a global network SMS to all phones based on what he read off the $3.95 Wal-mart clock hanging on his wall.

      Whatever the cause, cell phone clocks are not reliable. Simple as that.

      Rich

    15. Re:Inevitable... by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Cingular. It's been 2-3 years since I first noticed it -- since then I don't really pay much attention to my cell phone clock. I think it was a CDMA network, but I'm not 100% sure. I had a GSM phone after that which was often wrong, but it was a crappy phone and I suspect it wasn't syncing properly.

      Now I'm on AT&T/EDGE and it seems to be accurate so far as I can tell.

      Just because the clocks are tightly synchronized together, doesn't mean that the base time they're synchronizing to is correct. A Cesium clock will get you very accurate relative time, not absolute time...

    16. Re:Inevitable... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      So your saying these poor people call CA to get the Pacific Time?

      Or are you saying people can't afford a $5 watch?

    17. Re:Inevitable... by flink · · Score: 1

      CDMA is a stratum-0 time source, so I would say the cell network is pretty accurate. Individual cell phones might suck, but it's not a reflection on the network.

    18. Re:Inevitable... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      A poor person in a developing country can always ask his kid, who will read him the NTP time off their OLPC ;).

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    19. Re:Inevitable... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where they get their time from, but when I look at a cell phone (with network time sync enabled) and it's more than a minute off, I know not to trust it as a reliable time source.

      Huh? My cell is always 100% accurate with my radio atomic clock and cable TV system time.. as well as computer time.

    20. Re:Inevitable... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Cingular. It's been 2-3 years since I first noticed it'

      I've noticed the same with T-Mobile. The clock is about thirty seconds off. I don't consider that to be so grossly and horribly inaccurate as to be utterly useless. It's about as accurate as a wristwatch and I use my cell as such.

    21. Re:Inevitable... by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      4.2.2.1-6 (or -8, or -10, depending on your local network topology) are anycast addresses.

      They always resolve to a close DNS server. "That server" can't be elminated, because it can resolve to thousands of different servers all over the world.

    22. Re:Inevitable... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UK speaking clock, on 123, still works. American who need a time fix can call +44 123, as long as they remember to convert from GMT to their own time zone.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:Inevitable... by sho-gun · · Score: 1

      There's always 4.2.2.2 :)

    24. Re:Inevitable... by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm worried that one day they'll eliminate 127.0.0.1! The day they take that offline I'm in big trouble!

      --
      I hate printers.
    25. Re:Inevitable... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      They always resolve to a close DNS server.

      For me 4.2.2.1 resolves to one in Los Angeles, which is about 9000 miles away. Surely there is a closer DNS server somewhere.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    26. Re:Inevitable... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      I just resynced my laptop against the NIST NTP server and compared it to the two just-booted phones I have here (LG CU500 and iPhone, both on AT&T).

      The laptop hit the minute about 4 seconds before the CU500, which itself was about 1 second ahead of the iPhone.

      Far more than accurate enough to use for almost any normal purpose, but useless for anything needing truly accurate time.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    27. Re:Inevitable... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Whoah. I've been doing sysadmin stuff for years, and I had no idea that TCPv4 even had anycast, let alone actual working services using it. Is this stuff covered in the Cisco CCNA/CCNP/CCIE books? I ought to crack those open again... (I only have the CCNA books and maybe one CCDP)

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    28. Re:Inevitable... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      American who need a time fix can call +44 123, as long as they remember to convert from GMT to their own time zone. Might not work. AFAIK international dialling always requires the UK area code (stripped of its leading "0") after the +44. (I doubt there's a default "local" area).

      For example, locals can call the Royal Exchange Theatre in Manchester on "833 9833", but people elsewhere in the UK would have to prefix it with "0161", and international users would have to dial "+44 161 833 9833".

      I had guessed that since you can dial "123" from anywhere within the UK, this might imply that it's treated simply as a local number "123" by the phone system (even though the actual call will probably be routed to a non-local service). If it *were* treated as a "local" number, international users could get it by selecting an arbitrary (but valid) UK area code (e.g. 0161/161 for Manchester), and dialling "+44 161 123" which should access it via a pseudo-Manchester "123" number.

      Just one thing- I tried this (within the UK) and it doesn't work! :-(

      Maybe your idea does work after all, but I can't confirm that without faffing about and trying to kid the phone system that I'm actually calling from outside the UK. And I can't be arsed with that :-)
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    29. Re:Inevitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's probably an IT staff at these locations that really must hate us all...

    30. Re:Inevitable... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Ah, good point. There is another number you can dial if you want to go through an exchange (other telephone companies in the UK used to use this, I'm not sure if they still do).

      One nice thing about 123 is that it's easy to dial using loop-disconnect. You can call it by tapping the receiver with this pattern:

      tap, pause, tap-tap, pause, tap-tap-tap.

      Numbers larger than three are hard to get right, and so are longer numbers. If you are want to show off at a party, you can call the speaking clock without dialling.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:Inevitable... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      One nice thing about 123 is that it's easy to dial using loop-disconnect. You can call it by tapping the receiver with this pattern: tap, pause, tap-tap, pause, tap-tap-tap. Ah, apparently "loop disconnect" is pulse dialling, right? Does the loud noise get treated as a pulse like the ones generated by the dial?

      Anyway, I suppose the equivalent trick with tone dialling would be for two people who have good pitch to dial by singing certain combinations of notes. At least that should work in *theory* (I haven't tried it) since each "tone" in tone dialling is made of two actual musical notes played at the same time. (IIRC, there's a two-dimensional 3x4 matrix that gives the combination of notes for each number/symbol).
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    32. Re:Inevitable... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Ah, apparently "loop disconnect" is pulse dialling, right? Does the loud noise get treated as a pulse like the ones generated by the dial? No, it's exactly what the name implies. There is no loud noise, disconnecting the phone circuit and reconnecting it in the correct sequence produces the signal. It was the simplest mechanism that you can build for dialling a phone; the mechanical dial hangs up and then reconnects once every time the mechanism makes the click noise associated with pulse dialling. This generates a simple unary signal on the line, which is decoded at the exchange. When you tap the cradle, you are performing exactly the same operation, you just have to get the timing right.

      DTMF is harder. A few people can hum one note and whistle the other, but it's really hard. The Psion Series 3 could generate DTMF tones from numbers in your address book, which I found very useful before mobile phones were common. Most landline exchanges still support loop-disconnect, so this still works. Mobile phones, on the other hand, spoil the fun by moving dialing out-of-band.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    33. Re:Inevitable... by WNight · · Score: 1

      Most of these local things are just traps on certain patterns of outgoing digits, not actual phone numbers. 911 (999?) for instance. I'm not sure of the specifics of the routing and I'm sure it differs on types of switches, but there's usually (always?) a proper local number that the short form routes to.

      Just call the operator in the area and ask what the full number for that service is. I've done it for 911 when programming weird PBXes and such.

    34. Re:Inevitable... by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Or for hours of non-stop time-listening fun, you can always take the shortwave option, at the frequencies listed on the WWV website: http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwv.html.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    35. Re:Inevitable... by Atario · · Score: 1

      the cell-phone network
      So the cell phone network does broadcast the time? I knew it! Frickin' Motorola...or frickin' Cingular...er, I mean, AT&T. Why do I have to set mine up? Grr.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    36. Re:Inevitable... by TokyoJimu · · Score: 1

      I was given a tour of a GTE central office many years ago. There was a Dymo label on the #1 EAX console that said something like:

      Call 303-499-7111 every morning and set system time

      I asked the switchman if he did that. He said "Nah, I just set it to my watch."

    37. Re:Inevitable... by Maxx169 · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a little tyke, iD software, in an interview, announced that a beta copy of Quake could be downloaded from an ftp site at 127.0.0.1...
      ...
      ...
      Bastards!

    38. Re:Inevitable... by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, NNTP works fine, you just have to grep the news spool for a recently posted article.

    39. Re:Inevitable... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      When you tap the cradle, you are performing exactly the same operation, you just have to get the timing right.
      I think you also have to have the right phone. Afaict on many phones the cradle either goes through an electronic debouncing system or is simply too mechanically sloppy to dial this way.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    40. Re:Inevitable... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If they really cared they would just block access to everyone except thier own customers.

      I think the servers belong to a big ISP and strongly suspect we geeks from /. do not constitute signficant traffic to them.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    41. Re:Inevitable... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I know a certain network operator that had to buy a bunch of cesium clocks when they were upgrading from AMPS to TDMA. This was because the T in TDMA stands for "Time", and the timeslice needs minor monkey business when the phone is far from the tower, because of SOL propagation delay. To do TDMA with a sufficiently small slice to be useful, you need VERY accurate clocks.
      You do not need those clocks to be synchronised with any time that is meaningfull to humans nor to make them availible in a form that the phones can use to produce a time display.

      Tn my experiance most phones have the option to get time from the network but it doesn't always work (I have two nokia 8210's on one it works on the other it doesn't and I tested them both with the same sim, must be a firmware issue).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    42. Re:Inevitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, one of the servers used to resolve to i-will-not-steal-service

    43. Re:Inevitable... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      And if you need to make Jenny yours, call 867-5309

    44. Re:Inevitable... by Aleksej · · Score: 1

      Wow, there was a news server in the first Tornado BBS versions?!

    45. Re:Inevitable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's about as accurate as a wristwatch and I use my cell as such.

      Hint: The reason why people are pointing at you, giggling and whispering to each other is because you have a cell phone strapped to your wrist.

    46. Re:Inevitable... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Hint: The reason why people are pointing at you, giggling and whispering to each other is because you have a cell phone strapped to your wrist.'

      you mean that's not what the wrist strap is for?

  4. In Romania by psergiu · · Score: 1

    The Romanian equivalent - 958 (058 before the renumbering) - is still going strong - all-trough in form of a 2 node cluster - but with the original voice - digitized.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    1. Re:In Romania by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The UK version is too. The number is 123, which has the advantage of being easy to dial on a loop-disconnect exchange by tapping the hang up button repeatedly.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:In Romania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Romania, Time calls you!

  5. I feel sorry... by Treskin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I feel really sorry for whoever gets assigned the POP-CORN phone number.

    1. Re:I feel sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your name is Orville Redenbacher.

    2. Re:I feel sorry... by Treskin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny, I had never Wiki'ed POP-CORN before. I guess this is only used in Northern California so I suppose most won't get the joke. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_clock

    3. Re:I feel sorry... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > I feel really sorry for whoever gets assigned the POP-CORN phone number.

      I'd love to have it. I'd sell ads, make a damn fortune.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:I feel sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got to my freshman dorm at Boston U. and decided to call POP-CORN for the time... Got an answering machine of a guy who says "leave a message, or if you were calling for the time, you're probably just got off the plane from San Francisco, in Boston we dial NER-VOUS..."

    5. Re:I feel sorry... by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      I always dialed(anachronism alert) 767-7777(or 767-1111 when I had a dial phone) out of laziness.

      --
      Notmysig
  6. Sad by davidc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sad to see this go. I didn't use it very much but it was kind of reassuring that it was there. Okay, I'm crazy!

    I once answered the phone at work, and found that the call was the speaking clock. Weird... folks told me it was probably returning all the past calls I'd placed to it.

    1. Re:Sad by catbutt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My weird experience with "time" was one time I called it, and could hear the muffled sounds of everyone else who called it (with the time lady playing in the foreground). So it became like a big chat room, where everyone was asking what other people's real numbers were so they could call them and chat with random people of the opposite sex.

      Since this was approximately 1977 and there was no internet, well, it seemed pretty cool for the few days it lasted.

    2. Re:Sad by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Back in the early days of cheap three-way calling (or overly-complex beige boxing) a common phone prank was to conference two random numbers and stay quiet, let the targets speak to each other, and revel in the resulting "Who is this?" "You called me!" "No, you called me!" chaos. A variation on this was to three-way a target with movie theater recordings, error message recordings, or the good old speaking clock.
       
      On the off-chance that was me calling your job... ha-ha!

    3. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is off topic, but in today's world of widespread caller ID, you can still pull the same prank with caller ID spoofing and conference calls over voip in Asterisk. Quite a bit of fun.

    4. Re:Sad by ari_j · · Score: 1

      That is the coolest thing I have read all day.

    5. Re:Sad by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whilst Asterisk (especially in conjunction with a Grandstream Handytone ATA and a voice modem with ALSA drivers) is in most respects the fabled "sky blue pink box with yellow spots on", you cannot spoof caller ID with it. The only known way of spoofing caller ID (without the assistance of a telco) is for you to be on a Strowger exchange (i.e. non-DTMF) and the person on the far end still to have one of the first-generation Cable TV phones with caller ID (which used DTMF tones sent between the ringing pulses, as opposed to the 1200 baud modem tones used by modern caller ID). After dialling, and before they answer, press * to switch your phone to DTMF; any digits you dial will be appended to the display (which will scroll, and lose the original number [sent by the cableco] off the LHS. This behaviour is rather a giveaway). I don't believe there are any clicky-clicky exchanges left anymore (you can buy DTMF-only phones for home use, and they don't come with any warnings).

      Even if you have your own PRI, you get allocated (or can buy) a block of 30 numbers to go with it. You can assign any of those thirty numbers as the visible ident on any of your thirty B-channels, even to all of them at once; but if you try to assign a number that isn't yours to one of your lines, then it won't work -- it will come up on the far end's telephone as "number withheld". This all happens transparently and you do not receive any error messages.

      I know this from experience, because we ordered a second PRI; and sometimes when we tried to ident a line on PRI2 with a number from the PRI1 group, it would bomb out. Turned out that (due to a spelling mistake on the order form) BT hadn't properly associated the two lines with each other (they thought we were two different companies, and so not entitled to use each other's numbers). It didn't bomb every time, because (1) sometimes the calls were going out over PRI1 and (2) some people's lines still accept anonymous calls. Only once we had made this connection did anyone from the phone company have any clue what was up .....

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Sad by qzulla · · Score: 1

      There used to be a number you could call and it would connect you to a, more or less, party line. It worked the same as you described but with no time lady. It worked for about a week then went away. I'm thinking around 1970ish or so.

      qz

    7. Re:Sad by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even if you have your own PRI, you get allocated (or can buy) a block of 30 numbers to go with it. You can assign any of those thirty numbers as the visible ident on any of your thirty B-channels, even to all of them at once; but if you try to assign a number that isn't yours to one of your lines, then it won't work -- it will come up on the far end's telephone as "number withheld". This all happens transparently and you do not receive any error messages.
      Time Warner Telecom only implemented this correctly within the last few years. When we first got our PRI, any arbitrary CID value was passed through transparently.

      (What's this about 30 b-channels, btw? I'm used to 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel).
    8. Re:Sad by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      There used to be a number you could call and it would connect you to a, more or less, party line. It worked the same as you described but with no time lady. It worked for about a week then went away. I'm thinking around 1970ish or so.

      Back in the 1980s, in 616 (home of Slashdot) there were several of these. They pretty much always worked.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Sad by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Never had a phone occurance involving the time-lady - but I did a similar line-leak experiment back in the days when TVs could be "fine tuned" dial in phone conversations on the upper UHF frequencies with a portable tv (that served as my computer monitor).

      Between the basic rabbit ears and all the lines strung up in the area, it was (frighteningly) easy to pick up leakage - that was quite distinct and recordable (which I didn't do - I was just checking up on school geek-rumors on the methodology and whether it was an urban myth). The trick was finding a channel that had "patterened snow" and then waiting for a call to connect.

      On one such occasion I was almost tempted to pull a prank. Never did - but one call came through during a blizzard. The person was calling to report they were stuck in the snow and were leaving a message on the recipients answering machine. They left their callback number, so it would have been simple to dial that person back and ask if they needed further assistance.

      Never did of course. Interesting trick though. Perphaps that's what inspired the writers of the movie "Poltergeist".

    10. Re:Sad by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The British GPO (in the days the post office ran the phones in Britain) had a service called "Dial a Disc", where you could phone - I kid you not - a 3-digit number and listen to a radio-like music service. In probably worse quality than AM radio, and you had to pay for the privilege.

      Apparently, you could also do the same thing with that, too by shouting loudly enough down the phone.

      The speaking clock in Britain had also more frightening uses - the same network was also used for the nuclear attack alert that would start the air raid sirens should the Soviets launch.

    11. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's in europe. It's an E1 PRI, which has 3 chans.

    12. Re:Sad by trongey · · Score: 1

      Back in my college days (late '70s) we would call the "beep line". If you dialed your own number then in between the busy signal beeps you could talk to all the other people who had done the same thing. It substituted for fun, but not very well.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    13. Re:Sad by icroak · · Score: 1

      I did this too, and this was around 1989. It wasn't until about a couple years later that I noticed no more voices were heard.

    14. Re:Sad by Plugh · · Score: 1
      you could phone - I kid you not - a 3-digit number and listen to a radio-like music service

      They Might Be Giants are so way ahead of the curve on that one!
      (718) 387-6962

    15. Re:Sad by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      I recall that before I left the states after dialing a number I could hear faint DTMF tones before the ringing started. That sounds very much like what you're describing as the telco sending out my caller ID over the line to the other phone.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
  7. TiiIIiiiMMmme is on my side... by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 1

    yes it is! Oh, wait...

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:TiiIIiiiMMmme is on my side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent offtopic! No one is interested in Timmy!

  8. Don't pick up that phone by Applekid · · Score: 4, Funny
    TFA:

    One upside: AT&T says doing away with time would enable the creation of about 300,000 new phone numbers in California beginning with the 853 or 767 prefixes. Great, just what I need if I get one of those new numbers: questions about what time is it. Yes, my refridgerator is also running and there's no need to catch it, either.
    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
    1. Re:Don't pick up that phone by viking099 · · Score: 1

      Jenny? Is that you?

    2. Re:Don't pick up that phone by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that 867-5309 (and no, I don't want to go into why I remembered it without looking it up)?

    3. Re:Don't pick up that phone by TALlama · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Northern California, the prefix for calling time is 767, or P-O-P on a telephone keypad. For decades, locals up there have dialed POPCORN any time they have had to reset their watches or reprogram electronic gadgets after a power failure.

      First thought: Neat!

      Second thought: Why do those Northern Californians get a neat number, and we Southern Californians don't?

      Third thought: I can make one! Let's see.... UKELELE!

      Fourth thought: And that will be useful for precisely two more days. Great.
      --

      - The Amazina Llama

    4. Re:Don't pick up that phone by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side--you can crank call people and tell them what the time is.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    5. Re:Don't pick up that phone by TrebleMaker · · Score: 1

      Third thought: I can make one! Let's see.... UKELELE! AAAUGH! Now I'll be hearing ukeleles playing Popcorn in my head for the next three weeks.

      Oh, no, wait. I guess it's just mandolins.
      "Nevermind".

      --
      In Soviet Russia a beowulf cluster of these things imagines you welcoming your new, neural-network overlords.
  9. How do you set your clocks? by empiricistrob · · Score: 1

    How does everyone set their clocks without calling time? Lacking pulling out the shortwave radio and tuning to WWV, wasn't this the only low latency high accuracy clock easily accessible from home? (Key words low latency)

    1. Re:How do you set your clocks? by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does everyone set their clocks without calling time?
      Teletext.
    2. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Sunburnt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does everyone set their clocks without calling time?

      From my cell phone, like I imagine most folks do. Heck, I hardly see anyone my age (late 20's) or younger wearing watches anymore for that same reason.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    3. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I use the time on my computer, it's accurate to within a couple of seconds. Why would I need better accuracy?

    4. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Bake · · Score: 1

      I have my mobile phone automatically sync its clock to the one from the network.

    5. Re:How do you set your clocks? by glpierce · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      G
    6. Re:How do you set your clocks? by nairnr · · Score: 3, Informative

      All of the phones I have every had sync themselves up with the provider. Even when traveling around, it will pick up the local time without any intervention...

    7. Re:How do you set your clocks? by dcollins · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I go to http://www.time.gov/ .

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    8. Re:How do you set your clocks? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I just discovered that my Blackberry will NOT sync up by itself - I need to tell it to do so. It was slow by 5 minutes, in the 5 months I've had it, which is shitty timekeeping even for a watch my kids got out of a cereal box.

      God I hate this piece of shit...

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:How do you set your clocks? by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sundial.

    10. Re:How do you set your clocks? by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      Using the clock or computer that you set earlier based on the cellphone? I've got too many time-keeping devices for there to be any significant probability of them all needing to reset at the same time. Even when moving at least my cell and computers will keep decent time.

    11. Re:How do you set your clocks? by dintech · · Score: 1

      You can pretty easily set your PC clock accurately using one of many atomic clock servers. Infact I think this is even built into windows xp. I just set watches and alarm clocks based off my PC nowadays.

    12. Re:How do you set your clocks? by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Funny

      when I tried to use mine for DST at about 2:00am it was malfunctioning, the dark shadow was smeared all over the dial

    13. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      I was about to say, "What, you mean like a regular watch," but then I remembered that I never have to set the time on my cell phone as long as I'm within anyone's network, so I guess it's not really a problem.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    14. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work from work. I get message about firewall or Java settings. :-P

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    15. Re:How do you set your clocks? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Go to Options->Date/Time and change the "Date/Time Source" field from Blackberry to Network.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    16. Re:How do you set your clocks? by schweinhund · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Official US Government time :

      http://time.gov/

    17. Re:How do you set your clocks? by qzulla · · Score: 1

      What is this watch thing you speak of?

      qz

    18. Re:How do you set your clocks? by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      My last cell phone did not have the ability to sync its clock with the network. It was a royal pain in the ass.

    19. Re:How do you set your clocks? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a Sprint phone that would not recognize it was in Arizona in the Summer. AZ in the Summer is the same as West Coast time (AZ doesn't "Spring forward") so my cell time was off by an hour. The cell company swore to me that was not possible. Other folks on the network had the right time, and my phone was set to Network for time.

    20. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      My VCR picks up a time signal from... somewhere. It's not even plugged into cable. Just when it autoscans for channels it sits for a long ass time "setting clock". Somewhere it gets the time, and it's right too. Are there time stamps on over the air TV?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    21. Re:How do you set your clocks? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      PBS includes a time signal in the side information of their channel. Your VCR can identify the PBS channel during its station scan, and keeps itself updated from that.

      Thank a public service for providing you with a ... public service.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    22. Re:How do you set your clocks? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I did - 5 months ago. That's why I'm so pissed - it's set to get teh network time but won't.

      If I knew that this was going to be such a piece of crap I would never have let my boss take away my Treo.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    23. Re:How do you set your clocks? by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      Lacking pulling out the shortwave radio and tuning to WWV, wasn't this the only low latency high accuracy clock easily accessible from home?

      WWV has their own phone service: 303 499 7111
    24. Re:How do you set your clocks? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      How does everyone set their clocks without calling time?

      root# ntpdate us.pool.ntp.org

      On Windows XP or better, double-click the time in the task bar and select your web server. For older versions of Windows, NetTime (on sourceforge).

      On Unix systems, you can chose between xNTPd with complex setup of ntp.conf, or open ntp and a quick ntpd -S $server.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      The phone service makes it easier to watch the clock you're trying to set and sync up exactly when you hear the tone. My cell phone doesn't even have a seconds display.

      Hell, I've been known to call POP-CORN (as I grew up calling it) from my cell phone.

    26. Re:How do you set your clocks? by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      The CrackBerry the bank makes me carry doesn't change time when I change time zones. You have to go into the settings and change the time zone manually, even when the time is set to "network". Damned annoying.

    27. Re:How do you set your clocks? by mgoren · · Score: 1

      My phone fails to display the time whenever I'm out of a service area (on the subway, for instance.) And so I need a watch anyway.

    28. Re:How do you set your clocks? by m00seb0y · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you, I usually just call Flavor Flav.

    29. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      NTP works well enough.

      Either that or wait for the pips on Radio 4 when the news comes on.

    30. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      I do that too. But to set my car 2005 Honda Civic's radio clock I use my GPS navigation clock. Now that's more atomic than the phone company's. ^_^

      Seriously though, I mainly synchronize my wristwatch visually to my pc clock after synchronizing it with nist. Theretofore I sync my kitchen clock, microwave clock, etc.

      Funnily, in my teens I used to call att to sync my watch, etc. many times a week. Till my sister yelled at me for the phone charges in the monthly bill. I had thought the time service was free. Dumb kid I was! haha

    31. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people in Alaska live forever!

    32. Re:How do you set your clocks? by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, my handheld GPS unit (which doesn't even have an option to set the clock -- it always gets it from the GPS signal), doesn't auto-change timezones either. You'd think it would be trivial, since it knows my location, and already has maps of everywhere, but you still have to change it manually in the settings.

    33. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Deep+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes... well... I wear a wrist watch while carrying a cellphone, among other reasons, because I have to change the battery in my watch every 24 months, whereas my phone can't last as long as a week between charges. Also, there are places I go where there is no cell service (some rural areas in the Midwest, subbasements where signals can't reach, Antarctica, etc.), or is forbidden (airplanes in flight). I'm sure someone will tell me to buy a new phone, but the one I have doesn't provide the time unless it's attached to the cell network, and doesn't have a "flight" mode. So, no signal == no battery.

      In short, the watch happens to be a reasonably foolproof way of checking the time, especially since I frequently find myself looking at a blank or "searching for service" cellphone screen.

    34. Re:How do you set your clocks? by DJSpray · · Score: 1

      I guess you young-uns are too young to remember the days when cell phone clocks were about as accurate as PC clocks and you had to set them yourself when the battery went dead.

    35. Re:How do you set your clocks? by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      How does everyone set their clocks without calling time?


      I fire up my shortwave receiver and listen to WWV.
      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    36. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so click "disable java animation " at the RHS...

    37. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but what century is this?

      My radios (car and house) pick up the time from the RDS*
      My PVR picks up the time from teletext*
      My phone picks up the time from the network.
      My GPS spends its life talking to extremely accurate clocks and doesn't need me to tell it the time.
      PCs obviously can look after themselves.

      The only time I need to "set a clock" is when I go round the parents' house twice a year at the beginning and end of daylight saving time to adjust their antique video.

      * OK, I know that these two never quite got over the "not invented here" factor when they crossed the Atlantic, but I'm sure that equivalents exist.

      (mod either +1 Funny or -1 Smug European Bastard depending on taste)

    38. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This didn't work for me over the past weekend, as my Crackberry never had the correct time when I changed time zones. It was set for "Network" for the time (as you mentioned in your posting). Oh, well...

    39. Re:How do you set your clocks? by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      How does everyone set their clocks without calling time?

      Time.gov.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    40. Re:How do you set your clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WWV is a shortwave radio station. Calling a phone number might connect you to another copy of that program, but it's NIST that is running the thing, not "WWV."

    41. Re:How do you set your clocks? by baeksu · · Score: 1

      Did you try rebooting it?

      --
      Gnome: A never ending quest to make unix friendly to people who don't want unix and excruciating for those that do.
    42. Re:How do you set your clocks? by popoutman · · Score: 1
      One of the strange things about sundials is the necessity to have a calendar to be able to tell the time properly and accurately.

      Due to the eccentricity of the earth's orbit, the actual position of the sun in the sky can be up to 15 minutes ahead or behind the expected position of the sun for the time. You need the calendar to get the 'Equation of Time' modifier, which is applied to the time as measured on the sundial.

      Useful links to explain better:
      Sundial primer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundial
      Equation of Time: http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.351
      A particularly accurate sundial, to

      --
      - This sig deliberately left blank. Nothing to see, move along.
  10. Luke I am your father! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOO! Not the 617-522-1171! It also gives me my current temperature outside.
    Priceless for a basement-dwelling geek like me who has to check the weather outside to know if it's snowing or burning.

    1. Re:Luke I am your father! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just who is Dan Chirkov, and what has he done with the time machines???

  11. From TFA... by amccaf1 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Although not immediately related to the subject at hand, I found this interesting:

    By far the most prominent time lady was Jane Barbe, who succeeded Moore at Audichron in the 1960s. A former big band singer, Barbe (pronounced "Barbie") went on to become the voice of recorded telephone messages in the 1970s and '80s in the United States and elsewhere.

    Along with her interpretations of the time and current temperature, Barbe delivered the bad news too, telling you that circuits in a specific area were busy, please try again later, or that your call cannot be completed as dialed.

    And who will ever forget her heartbreaking rendition of "I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is no longer in service"?

    Barbe died of cancer-related complications in 2003 at age 74. It's estimated that at the height of her fame, Barbe's voice was heard worldwide about 40 million times a day.
    I'm going to be freaked out the next time I hear that voice and realize that -- like that old lady in the episode of THE TWILIGHT ZONE -- I'm hearing a voice from the grave...
    --
    "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
    1. Re:From TFA... by LMacG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There used to be a website with a bunch of the "Bell System" recorded announcements. Unfortunately, I just checked my bookmark and got a 404 for the subpage, and just a parked domain notice for the site. Guess I should have saved them when I could.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    2. Re:From TFA... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm going to be freaked out the next time I hear that voice and realize that -- like that old lady in the episode of THE TWILIGHT ZONE -- I'm hearing a voice from the grave...
      What, because you used to think she was actually there talking to you?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:From TFA... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Although, to be fair, you do that every time you see an old movie. I think it's creepier to see pinup shots of Marilyn Monroe hanging in old guys' garages. There's something fundamentally wrong with that.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:From TFA... by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      You might want to check to see if a copy of the page exists at the Internet Archive.

    5. Re:From TFA... by MrAtoz · · Score: 1

      When I was growing up in Atlanta, Jane Barbe ("Miz Barbe", as we young-uns would say down South) lived around the corner from us. Whenever we needed to call the time-of-day service to get the accurate time, we used to refer to it as "Calling Miz Barbe to get the time". It was always a bit eerie to hear a neighbor's voice in those kinds of systems ...

    6. Re:From TFA... by amccaf1 · · Score: 1

      Although, to be fair, you do that every time you see an old movie.
      True! In fact I recall an episode of MST3k where the short film in question features a line of dancing girls on ice sweeping majestically across the ice rink. Joel deadpans, "Wow, and to think *all* these people are dead now."
      --
      "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
    7. Re:From TFA... by businessnerd · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's my personal favorite...

      I'm sorry, the fingers you have used to dial are too fat. To obtain a special dialing wand, mash the keypad with your palm now.
      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    8. Re:From TFA... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Now you know how Deanna Troi feels talking to the Enterprise computer.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:From TFA... by TALlama · · Score: 2, Informative

      Happy Birthday (by way of Wikipedia).

      --

      - The Amazina Llama

    10. Re:From TFA... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      It's usually not a problem until she forgets herself and says, "Thanks, Mom!"

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  12. Jacking Into The Matrix by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 4, Funny

    "anxiously awaiting the arrival of its cousin: The Pay-Phone."

    That's gonna make escaping Agent Smith just THAT much harder.

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    1. Re:Jacking Into The Matrix by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      "anxiously awaiting the arrival of its cousin: The Pay-Phone." That's gonna make escaping Agent Smith just THAT much harder. Oh my God... you just put your finger on one of the things that's *really* going to date The Matrix in a few years time.

      It's a real shame; The Matrix was a cool film at the time, and still is to a large extent, but even a few years back I knew it was something that wasn't going to stand up so well twenty years after its release. Partly because its originality and freshness would have been copied and assimilated so much that they became normal (I saw an insurance advert recently that *totally* rips off the "endless gun racks" scene).

      But also partly because it was built around the technology of the time, and that inevitably will date. People like me will still look upon it fondly, but I doubt that kids watching it for the first time in 2019 will see it as anything more than a period piece- they won't "get" it. Sure, some 14-year olds who are "really into late-90s culture" will enjoy it, but as a retro piece. Regardless of what they think, they won't experience it in the same way.

      I'm not even sure if it's possible to view it in the same way nowadays, 8 years after its release. Shame...
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Jacking Into The Matrix by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      The reason pay phones are going away is that we ARE in the Matrix! They are just patching a security hole.

  13. Ehhh... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was all relative, anyway...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Ehhh... by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.

  14. Speaking clock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the article repeatedly refer to a Speaking Clock as "Time"?

  15. AT&T Stops 'Time' by sits69 · · Score: 0

    * Envisages Neo walking up to the 'Time Machine', holding up his open hand and quietly whispering, "No." *

  16. Speaking Clock by Ramble · · Score: 0

    We still have the speaking clock in the UK, and have for as long as I can remember.

    --
    "Oh boy"
    1. Re:Speaking Clock by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

      Great, what's the number? It's toll free right?
      That can't be the right time. It's still daylight!
      And what's with the funny accent on that line? Oh, can we get Sean Connery to do the readings? :)

  17. Advanced Technology by nairnr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whoa, we must have been ahead of the curve. We used to get Time AND Temperature!!!

    1. Re:Advanced Technology by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      So did we but we always got it from the bank not the phone company.

      (Where I grew up we weren't served by ATT or the baby bells but a local phone company. I'm not sure if they ever had time and/or temp.)

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  18. Cable TV? by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 1

    Cable TV? cell phone? internet?

  19. It's a bird! It's a plane! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
    How does everyone set their clocks without calling time? Lacking pulling out the shortwave radio and tuning to WWV, wasn't this the only low latency high accuracy clock easily accessible from home? (Key words low latency)

    Your wristwatch?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  20. What ended the AT&T time service by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The thing that finally made the AT&T time service over telephone lines obselete was the dramatic reduction in the cost of small clocks that allow you to pick up the 60 kHz WWVB time signal. In fact, you can get wristwatches around US$40 that can do that now (I have a Casio wrist watch that does this).

    1. Re:What ended the AT&T time service by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      Except if you live on Baffin Island...gps watches are too bulky so I wear a Seiko Quartz Alpinist...loses maybe 10 seconds a year.

      Hedghog

    2. Re:What ended the AT&T time service by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Do people who live on Baffin Island have some sort of irresistable compulsion to post 23 times about their stupid watch?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  21. Maybe its time has come by crgrace · · Score: 1

    I remember POP-CORN quite fondly. It was the only way to reset your clocks after a power outage if you didn't have a wind-up or battery powered watch/clock you trusted. My friends and I used to play the lamest game when we were in elementary school. We would dial POP-CORN and try to time it so the voice would say "exactly". It was a timing thing. Instead of saying "three forty-two and twelve seconds", to hear it say "three forty-three exactly" was a real score! Ah, the early 80s.

  22. And yet by simong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the UK, we got a new speaking clock earlier this year. It's been sponsored for more than twenty years too.

    1. Re:And yet by rowlingj · · Score: 1

      Immortalised by Vangelis in Albedo 0.39

  23. What is the # by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    Not sure how this service works. Know when I was very little back in the 80's you could call a number (thought bank) and it would have an automated time/weather. Seems like every city in the area had their own version of that. Is this the same thing? Or is there a centralized number for everone in the US to use in each timezone?

  24. Title change please by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    Wow! You guys really had me going there for a moment. I mean, if AT&T really did stop time, what rules would apply? Timecop rules or Back to the Future rules?

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:Title change please by BiloxiGeek · · Score: 1

      As long as it's not TimeRider rules, those are just silly.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, For you are crunchy and go well with ketchup.
  25. time == money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At&t has been giving away time for years, what a loss leader..... after all time == money right?

  26. "At the tone..." by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    My main time reference at home is a WWVB clock.

    In the field I use GPS for accurate (atomic clock accurate, in fact) time. If I have a shortwave radio with me I use WWV. WWV's audio feed is on 303 499 7111, which can be useful. Sometimes, for the hell of it, I'll dial WWVH on 808 335 4363 instead. I have both as contacts in my cellphone. Sad or what?

    Aloha!

    ...laura, with many temporal options

    1. Re:"At the tone..." by schweinhund · · Score: 1

      Such numbers give me great satisfaction. You're a heroine!

      If only 407.425.1111 was in its former glory.

    2. Re:"At the tone..." by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      Enlighten me. What is/was 407-425-1111?

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  27. No disrespect to the dead meant... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 4, Funny

    But we used to call her the "Bell Bitch"

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  28. time only stops for California... by whizzard · · Score: 1
    Looks like only California is out of time, for now. From the article:

    Indeed, time already has stopped in 48 other states, he said. California and Nevada are the two remaining holdouts. [...]
    Time's up statewide Sept. 19. Britton said Nevada service would live on borrowed time for an unspecified period, until the equipment in that state similarly starts breaking down.
  29. Time doesn't go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just moves to VoIP, like everybody else: FWD 612

  30. my kid by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My seven-year-old daughter had never heard it. I read the LA Times article this morning, dialed the number nostalgically for myself, and then went and explained it to my daughter. She had all these questions, like "By the time they say what time it is, isn't it already over?" and "Do they do it every second?" I had imagined that it was just part of our universally shared culture, but it was obviously a completely foreign concept to her. I dialed it for her and had her listen. She listened and smiled at me indulgently.

    1. Re:my kid by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you got a bright one there. I'm impressed that those were her first questions.

      You are, of course, teaching her to repair PCs, put ends on Cat5, and program in multiple languages... Right?

      My niece would say 'nuh uh' first (because my father's 'teasing' includes a lot of outright lying) and then ... I have no idea. I don't think she'd ask anything. She would probably run to tell her mother about it. (She's 6.)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:my kid by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      My seven-year-old daughter had never heard it. I'm in my early thirties, and whilst I'd heard of the "speaking clock" (which is what we call the UK version), I'm not sure that I've *ever* called it before.

      Anyway, I have now; I just called it to test something out. :-) I was slightly disappointed that the current speaking clock voice isn't as "cut glass" as the one at the end of Vangelis's "Pulstar" (recorded in the mid-1970s).

      Dammit, I'm paying 30p, I want my "clipped voice" speaking clock!!!
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:my kid by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      "By the time they say what time it is, isn't it already over?" and "Do they do it every second?"

      Oh my you've bred yourself there an embedded programmer.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    4. Re:my kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sort of surprises me. When I moved in 1997, I was irritated because they didn't have a time number in this city (or I didn't know it). I ended up setting my wristwatch from a clock somewhere.

      I got DSL in 1999 (first year it was available) so after that I could use NTP. But the concept of getting time from a computer or cell phone only became prevelant within the last 5-7 years, I would think anyone older than that would have called the 'time' phone number.

    5. Re:my kid by Xzarakizraiia · · Score: 1

      I'm 19 and this article is the first time I've heard of it. I have heard sound bytes of a voice saying "At the tone, the time is..." but I never knew what it was.

  31. Time? Frost Bank Time is 1-210-226-3232 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call in the next 60 seconds and get the current downtown temperature at no extra charge!

  32. It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is more than sad. For me it's been indispensible.

    You see, those numbers are absolutely wonderful to use for websites that require a phone number for registration. Sure, I could just make up a number. Or give one out of someone else. But I hate the idea of bugging some innocent person with this. Even people whom I don't like.

    A case in point are the job boards. These days lots of job shops in India pick up on these numbers and pester people for their Resumes non-stop. I suspect it's to say that they looked for an American citizen so they can fill a position with an H1-B (given their attitude, I can't imagine that it's to help work with the person they are calling).

    So I give them the number for time, knowing that it will cost them money to call it.

    There must be an elegant alternative which is equally fruitful, but I am at a loss for ideas. Does anyone have any?

  33. Called it yesterday by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

    I was testing out my new land line yesterday and called Time. I can't believe they're getting rid of it, it even has its own exchange (at least in Maryland). (Area code)-844-[any number]. It's odd though, it never occurred to me that it was run by AT I always just assumed it was NIST.

    1. Re:Called it yesterday by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      OK, now after fully reading TFA (and I guess just the summary), I'm a little confused, as they say that California and Nevada are the only ones who still have it. But I did call time just yesterday, and I did it again just now, it's the same as always ("at the tone, the time will be whatever and whatever seconds... BEEP"), Does Maryland just have a different system, is the article incorrect, or am I just missing something?

    2. Re:Called it yesterday by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I hear that many Americans don't have maps. Such as.

      Rich

    3. Re:Called it yesterday by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Time and weather are provided by Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone (now Verizon). TFA only applies to California.

      Many years ago, WWV, the National Bureau of Standards (now NIST) time & frequency radio station was located in Greenbelt, Maryland. I saw an old map that showed its location to be where the Goddard Space Flight Center's Visitor Center is now located. It was moved to Colorado in the '60s.

      The Naval Observatory in DC has been providing time services since dinosaurs roamed the Earth.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Called it yesterday by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      Ah, makes sense; the main NIST campus in Gaithersburg isn't too far away from Greenbelt. I used to work there, a lot of the electronics still say NBS since they can't ever throw anything away and a lot of it is still functional. I'm glad to live in a state that values its ability to get the time by phone, there's just something comforting about knowing that woman will always be on the other end to tell me what the time will be at the tone.

  34. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Give them a number starting in 411, i.e. (area code)-411-whatever, such as (419)-411-4321

    They won't know the difference, but the locale should transfer them to information.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  35. Re:Memories by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe I'll just have to give him a watch that syncs wirelessly with ntp for Christmas this year. Seems like a huge waste of effort to require wireless networking and ntp to sync the time, when clocks that sync using shortwave or GPS radio signals are cheap, reliable, and readily available.
  36. Only California and Nevada left? by fo0bar · · Score: 1

    I'm 99% sure that there are many local/regional/national telcos left that still provider time and weather. I'm guessing that they mean California and Nevada are the only states left that have dedicated entire prefixes for time and weather. FYI, the article didn't mention it, but Northern Nevada (everything but Vegas) uses 775-844-xxxx, traditionally 775-844-1212. I'm not sure about Southern Nevada (area code 702).

    So why is AT&T completely getting rid of time & weather in California? The article talks about "obsolete equipment", but you could replace that with a Pentium 120MHz running Asterisk. Oh wait, we're talking about a big telco here. That would cost at least $10m.

    1. Re:Only California and Nevada left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the article is completely wrong. There is definitely time service in the Boston area: 617-637-1234 (actually, any number in the 637 exchange will get you the time; hence, 617-NER-VOUS). Weather is 617-936-1234 (same thing...any number in the WX (936) exchange will get you the weather).

      Lots of crosstalk on both lines for some reason.

    2. Re:Only California and Nevada left? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too. I live in St. Louis, Missouri - and I don't recall *ever* having some number to dial, sponsored by AT&T, that would read off the time? Maybe I was just ignorant of it? But even as a small kid, the numbers I recall were (314)321-2522 (for time and temperature), and (314)321-2222 (for a detailed weather report). The first used to be sponsored by the now defunct "Boatmen's Bank", and the latter was run by KMOX AM 1120 radio.

      Our "time and temperature" number continued on for years, sponsored by different banks - and finally was disconnected for a while. But it was revived recently, due to popular demand.

    3. Re:Only California and Nevada left? by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Years ago, many telephone companies replaced the analog/mechanical drum machines with digital machines that used ROMs to store digitized voice samples. No moving parts to wear out.

      The local telephone company used to dedicate entire exchanges to time (844-XXXX) and weather (936-XXXX). Not that long ago, someone decided that it was a waste to use a whole exchange for one service, and changed them into normal 7-digit numbers, freeing up the other numbers in the exchange for other uses.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Only California and Nevada left? by LochNess · · Score: 1

      When I was growing up in the 70's in California, the prefix was 767, and would remember it as 415-POP-CORN.

    5. Re:Only California and Nevada left? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself who stands to profit by replacing services whose hardware is long since paid for and cost essentially nothing to run, and you'll have the answer.

      For Time, it's probably going to become something available only via GPS, much as cell phones provide the pressure to remove roadside call boxes.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Only California and Nevada left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still works in Michigan, at least the western half. Kids would write on bathroom walls and in textbooks, "For a good TIME call 459-1212". I remember once they "lost the Time lady." The Bel guys were like, yeah, all the Bearded Gurus have died or retired, we'll never find here again," but after an outcry, they did. : )

  37. Re:And yet ....BEEP BEEP BEEP... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

    The UK needs to have a speaking clock. How else would Ford Prefect be able to crash evil corporations in space.

    --
    We are the Borg...
  38. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    202 456 1414

    No productive work goes on there, so you won't be interrupting anyone.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  39. does anyone use that? by joeldg · · Score: 1

    I mean..
    just look at your cell phone..
    or your watch..
    or look up at almost any wall.. ..

    1. Re:does anyone use that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a bit off-topic, but I'd like to vent my frustration with Microsoft Windows Mobile. This OS runs on Smartphones and PDA phones, and it does one thing like Windows (desktop) when it should *instead* do it like a normal cell phone: it lets you set the time to whatever you want! My last cell phone would turn on, and sync the time with the cell phone towers. It was ALWAYS accurate, assuming it could get a signal. It even knew which time zone you were in. Now my damn smartphone and my pda phone are always wrong, because when your battery gets too low it loses its memory of the time. And it DOESN'T have the ability to get the time from the damn cell phone towers! Aaaaarrrghh! What the hell were they thinking?? I have to get online, go to www.time.gov, and set the time manually myself. Can anybody explain why they did this? Did they think it was a feature? "You can customize your Windows smartphone to be ten minutes fast, so you're always early!"

    2. Re:does anyone use that? by CompMD · · Score: 1

      That would be a great solution if it weren't for the oft overlooked fact that over 90% of America is rural. How are those of us in "flyover states" going to get the time?

    3. Re:does anyone use that? by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure that newfangled "watch" invention will find its way to rural America in due time.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    4. Re:does anyone use that? by CompMD · · Score: 1

      What do you set the watch to?

    5. Re:does anyone use that? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you're not really a resident of a fly-over rural state. otherwise you'd know to get up with the rooster, each lunch at "high noon" and go to bed with the sun.

    6. Re:does anyone use that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What process converts the sun into a rooster? Is this some local religion? :P

    7. Re:does anyone use that? by joeldg · · Score: 1

      hahahahahah!!

      I just about blew coffee on my monitor reading this..

      you forgot about slopping the pigs, whitewashing something, milking the cows and calling the dogs in.;)

    8. Re:does anyone use that? by compmanio36 · · Score: 1

      Umm......my Treo 700 does update to network time. Maybe just a feature added to this version of Windows Mobile meant for this device? I can see why network time updates would not be a important issue for the developers of Windows Mobile originally. Originally, most PDAs did not have the capability for wireless access, and merging a PDA with a cellphone is a fairly new item as well. Therefore those that use WM for their phones are simply running off the old code not optimized for cellphone usage, but for PDA usage. Newer WM phones have this capability either added by editing existing code to allow for this update, but perhaps some manufacturers have not taken the time to do so. Does WM6 have this capability?

    9. Re:does anyone use that? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      those dang roosters start crowing roughly an hour before the sun even starts to peek over the horizon

  40. LOL; Darn good choice by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I may have to use that as well.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  41. Ahh, nostalgia by e9th · · Score: 1

    Growing up in Chicago, I had a cheap wristwatch and a cheaper guitar. Every few days I'd pick up the phone, tune my A string to the 440Hz component of the dial tone, then dial (really dial!) CAthedral 8-8000 and set my watch. This didn't improve my playing or my punctuality, but it did make me feel better.

  42. "Me too" by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I figured this would've been built into the switches since the '80s if not sooner.

    This kind of equipment belongs in the era of cross-bar telephone switches.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  43. Now what number will chics use? by s31523 · · Score: 1

    What number will chics who you ask for their number use as their "real" number? Thanks AT&T, maybe we will have a chance to get their real phone numbers now!

    1. Re:Now what number will chics use? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      In the UK, BBC Radio 1 run a line called "Flirt Divert". People hand that number out (pretending it's their own) to people who ask and they don't want to give their real number to, and their answering phone messages get played back on the radio. Some people leave multiple messages, and make a real fool of themselves.

      It's almost as funny as when they were linking the calls to two Chinese takeaways together, so you had two people speaking bad English arguing over who was the restaurant and who was ordering.

    2. Re:Now what number will chics use? by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, now they'll switch to their local version of the Rejection Hotline.

  44. Not dead yet! by p_trekkie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the US Naval Observatory, which maintains the official time for the US still has the voice announcer available over the phone. According to this page the numbers are
    (202) 762-1401 and (202) 762-1069
    for Washington DC and
    (719) 567-6742
    for the alternate master clock in Colorado Springs, CO.

    1. Re:Not dead yet! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      In Canada, the phone number for the NRC time is unchanged at 613-745-1576.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:Not dead yet! by StarDrifter · · Score: 1

      In Connecticut, time and temperature is available at the number SPRINGS (203-777-4647). You have to listen to a short ad from AT&T first.

    3. Re:Not dead yet! by nateb · · Score: 1

      There is another one in Colorado at 303.499.7111, which I believe is hosted by NIST.

      --
      -- Nate
    4. Re:Not dead yet! by Dausha · · Score: 1

      Next time I have a call I want to end, I'll third-person dial in this clock.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    5. Re:Not dead yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also 303.499-7111 which is the NIST clock in Boulder.

  45. The payphone? NEVER! by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 3, Funny

    The payphone will never be obsolete so long as we have Superman.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by rishistar · · Score: 1

      What about the TARDIS? Payphone and time machine in 1!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    2. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      What about the TARDIS? Payphone and time machine in 1!


      The TARDIS's outward appearance is not a payphone. It is, as the sign on it clearly states, a police call box.

      Chris Mattern
    3. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by mstahl · · Score: 1

      And how long's it been since you've seen one of those out in the wild?

    4. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The TARDIS's outward appearance is not a payphone. It is, as the sign on it clearly states, a police call box. Ironically, police call boxes were already well on their way towards obsolescence by the time "Doctor Who" started in 1963. I've heard it suggested that this was an oversight on the part of Sydney Newman, who being Canadian was (supposedly) not aware of this when he chose an everyday British object. But that might be apocryphal bollocks; anyway, the first time we see the Tardis it's in a junk yard, so maybe they did know this. Or not, who knows...
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      The payphone will never be obsolete so long as we have Superman. Umm, I have some bad news for you....
      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    6. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The payphone will never be obsolete so long as we have Superman.

      Until he starts hanging around with Dr. Who.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:The payphone? NEVER! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Superman doesn't need payphones, he can use mobiles like the rest of us.

      And he's superman. Any payphone could become mobile if he feels like lugging it around.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  46. headlines by SolusSD · · Score: 1

    What is with headlines these days?? Just in the past couple of days i've seen headlines with the word "terror" (in quotes) just because someone quoted in the story used the word terror, and now "AT&T Stops 'Time'"? I realize headlines must be attention grabbing but this is a little ridiculous.

  47. Go with the classic by benhocking · · Score: 1

    (area code) 555-1212 — this connects you to information for any area code, AFAIK.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Go with the classic by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't always work, I'm afraid. My mom used it once on her cell phone trying to get information from Colorado, but despite putting in the proper area code, it gave her local information. After some confusion, the operator was able to help her anyway.

    2. Re:Go with the classic by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      if only joybubbles were alive, he could tell the telco what the problem was.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    3. Re:Go with the classic by SpaceballsTheUserNam · · Score: 0

      i thought the classic was (area code) 911-1212

      --
      \.
    4. Re:Go with the classic by Zillatron · · Score: 1

      (area code) 555-1212
      That's the number I usually give when forced. If you care enough to call it I am listed, but I don't need my home phone added to too many lists.
    5. Re:Go with the classic by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      at that point you are interfering with a legal institution intended to help people and save their lifes - wasting their time and putting people in danger.

      Trust me, you don't want the fines and possible jail time that could get you.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    6. Re:Go with the classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Trust me, you don't want the fines and possible jail time that could get you.

      Speaking from personal experience, I take it?

  48. Re:And yet ....BEEP BEEP BEEP... by rpjs · · Score: 1

    I thought it was the speaking clock somewhere in Australia that he patched them through to. IIRC the BBC TV version played a little snippet that went something like "At the third stroke it will be [whatever], just enough time to crack open another tinnie."

  49. US Naval Observatory Master Clock by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

    202-762-1401 & 202-762-1069 (Washington DC), 719-567-6742 (Colorado Springs CO); the audio track from WWV.

  50. Zeno will save us! by JesseBHolmes · · Score: 1

    Before the watch-futures market collapses, remember that time won't actually end. We'll get half-way to the cut-off date in September, then half-way from there, and so on, and so on . . .

  51. Ah, memories... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was just thinking about this the other day for some reason!

    One memory I have from youth is taking my oh-so-new-and-cool digital watch and carefully synchronizing it exactly to the beep when I called time. :)

    Of course, later I synced my watch one day to the atomic clock, and then for some reason decided to check it against 853-1212. Imagine my geek outrage when freakin' Time was FORTY SECONDS OFF. I felt like an idiot for carefully syncing my watch all that time.

    *sigh* another naive belief of youth falls. ("I mean, it's the phone company, of course they'd carefully ensure that 853-1212 has the exact time to the millisecond!")

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Ah, memories... by splindler · · Score: 1

      I can live w/out time but don't get rid of 8675309!!!! Pleeeeeeeeeeze!!!!!!

      --
      If change is constant why do I feel the same?
    2. Re:Ah, memories... by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      The phone company synced to atomic time twice a year when DST changed. So long as everybody synced to the same standard what's the big deal?

      --
      Notmysig
    3. Re:Ah, memories... by SteveWoz · · Score: 1

      In the '80's I would set my clocks and watches, even computer clocks by WWV. On more than one occasion I detected the local time signal (Los Gatos, CA,different central offices on different occasions when this happened) drifting. I might notice it 10 seconsd off. Then a few days later 12 seconds off. I would report this but nobody at GTE that I spoke to understood or got it fixed. One time it drifted as much as 40 seconds off before they fixed it. Another time it got to 1 minute and 40 seconds off, despite my several calls to report this. I guess those at the phone company trusted it so much and didn't believe me. This was before digital cell phones with accurate time and before computers had accurate time, so how do you know that your time signal is off? Very few people used WWV (5, 10 and 15 MHz on your shortwave radio) to set the time.

      On one occasion I was in a class at San Jose City College. I call myself an alumni of that college but it was a 2-day driver improvement course. On the second day of this 2-day weekend one gentleman showed up 10 minutes late. The class had been shooting the 'b' (breeze?) and hadn't started into any material yet. But the instructor looked at the late arrival, who was Indian and could barely speak English, and told him to go home and register for the class again, that he was too late, that the class rule was 10 minutes late. I looked at my watch, which had been recently set to the correct time via WWV and this late arrival had actually beaten the 10-minute late allowance. The clock on the wall was 45 seconds fast. I raised my hand and explained this and the teacher thought I was making up things like "WWV" and "5 Megahertz." I swore that it was true so strongly that the teacher said we'd take a vote. Naturally everyone voted this poor guy in. The teacher once again asked me if was really true and I told him it was.

      It was fun back then being about the only person with such exact time. Those days are gone though. Almost everyone gets it the easy ways now.

      --
      OK a new size TV
  52. Pay phones have their uses by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    I hope pay phones don't go completely extinct. I would have been royally screwed a couple months ago without one - I managed to lock myself out of my house with no keys, cel phone, or cash. I did have my wallet, though, so I could go to a 7-11, buy a prepaid phone card, and call my husband from a pay phone. Otherwise I would have had to break a window to get inside. (Now I have spare keys hidden in the car - I'd actually gone to make them that day but got there a half hour after the hardware store closed.)

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    1. Re:Pay phones have their uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did pay phones stop taking coins or something?
      I really don't know.

    2. Re:Pay phones have their uses by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

      Unrelated to phones, but I once broke my car key in the lock while at work, 30 miles from home. It turns out a locksmith can make a duplicate of a broken key. I now keep a spare in my desk at work.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    3. Re:Pay phones have their uses by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      No, but as I said, I had no cash on me. I bought the prepaid card with my debit card.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  53. blind people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how will blind people get the time now?

  54. Oh come now by Adambomb · · Score: 1

    anxiously awaiting the arrival of its cousin: The Pay-Phone At the same time as the new Communications and Multimedia Pay-Per-Usage Access Points are brought in!

    I doubt we'll ever see a complete removal of pay-per-use communications points, especially in captive audience type areas.
    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  55. Sure do -- some of these services still exist by FreelanceWizard · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can still get time and temperature (preceded by an advertisement for Captain D's) at:

    901-526-5261

    It's commonly known around Memphis, TN -- at least among those who know about it -- as "JAMJAM1".

    --
    The Freelance Wizard
    1. Re:Sure do -- some of these services still exist by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      I can still get time and temperature from a local bank, been using the same number for 3 decades at least if not more. Didn't even know that AT&T had the same service.

    2. Re:Sure do -- some of these services still exist by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Time & temperature in Las Vegas is a 3-digit number: 118. It only works on landline phones connected to Embarq (the local phone company, spun off from Sprint a while back) AFAICT; it doesn't work with VoIP or cell-phone services.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  56. So just call NIST instead by laing · · Score: 1

    303-499-7111 (or tune your shortwave receiver to any one of the internationally allocated standard carrier frequencies of 2.5, 5, 10, 15, or 20 megahertz).

    1. Re:So just call NIST instead by jra · · Score: 1

      "internationally allocated standard carrier frequencies".

      Heh.

      This was a fun thread, but where'd the PRI CNID spoofing side trip come from?

      (30d channels because it's an E-1 based PRI; 32 timeslots.)

  57. Re:And yet ....BEEP BEEP BEEP... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I live in the US, so read the book. In the book he patches into the London speaking clock.

    --
    We are the Borg...
  58. Why it existed by Joaz+Banbeck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, for legal reasons that wouldn't work. You see, they need to use the same time marking as the billing system.

    I found this out years ago when my GF was getting really persistent obscene phone calls. We called the phone company to ask for their help. They said to write down the time and date of each call. They specifically said to call their number for the time. I asked why. They said that way they could be sure who made the call to within 10 seconds, otherwise an eventual prosecution of the caller was sure to fail because the defense could argue that the GF's clock was off by just a few minutes, and that would be room for reasonable doubt.

    BTW, I presume that they have concluded that it is no longer neccesary because everyone's cell phone has relatively accurate time ( and the clocks that are set according to cell time ).

    1. Re:Why it existed by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 4, Funny

      I found this out years ago when my GF was getting really persistent obscene phone calls.
      Sorry about that. I've moved on and starting harassing someone else's GF. No hard feelings, I hope. :)

      --
      Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    2. Re:Why it existed by GodsBlood · · Score: 1

      Actually he was the obscene phone caller. Just very delusional thinking this girl was his girlfriend.

    3. Re:Why it existed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he was the obscene phone caller. Does that mean he called obscene phones, or simply called *from* an obscene phone?
    4. Re:Why it existed by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I presume that they have concluded that it is no longer neccesary because everyone's cell phone has relatively accurate time ( and the clocks that are set according to cell time ).
      Except Roger's (AT&T) up here in Canada. They can't seem to get their cellphones to calibrate to a network time. Maybe it's just specific phone models, but everybody I know on Roger's doesn't have this feature, while every phone I've had on other networks has no problem doing this.
      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Why it existed by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Except *any* phone I've ever seen (in Europe).

      Do you really mean to say that USians don't have to set the time on newly purchased phones, and remember to adjust to summer/winter time? Do you really mean to say that all USians have the same time on their phones? Wow ... that'd really be something.

    6. Re:Why it existed by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      In Canada on Bell and Telus that's how it works. You never have to change the time, because it's set automatically. DST and all. I don't see why any provider wouldn't have that feature.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Why it existed by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean Europeople have to manually set the time? I think you're lying.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    8. Re:Why it existed by Baumi · · Score: 1

      You mean Europeople have to manually set the time? I think you're lying. For the record: He isn't. I own 2 GSM cell phones, each with a different German provider. Both have an option for obtaining time via the network, but it doesn't work with either one. I suppose it's an optional feature that neither provider offers. (Apparently, most other uopean provders don't, either.)

      Jens
    9. Re:Why it existed by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Well, no, we can't actually "set the time". All we can do is adjust our clocks to it. ^_^ Sorry couldn't resist.

      All I know is, none of my friends' phones are in sync (unless we manually sync them, bad-guy-style). I keep mine somewhat synced to my pc's which are synced to pool.ntf.org.

    10. Re:Why it existed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh, and Europeans always claim to be so advanced with the phones. The last phone I had to set the time on was analog. Everyone with the same provider as me has the same time. I have a pile of Nextel phones here (for which I'm responsible) and they all have the same time. My personal T-Mobile phone is a minute different from those, but my wife's T-Mobile is the same as mine.

      I think you're full of it though. When I traveled through Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg and France I would always get a welcome message from a new provider, and my time would set to whatever that providers time was.

      But then again this is from someone who doesn't know the appropriate term for citizens of the United States of America.

    11. Re:Why it existed by jj421 · · Score: 1

      That's probably because they use that "metric" time over there. :-)

    12. Re:Why it existed by MetalPhalanx · · Score: 1

      I'm on Roger's here in Canada (Ottawa actually), and the auto time calibration works on mine, a Motorola V360, but I had to dig through the menus to enable it. Even then, it only corrects the time as a step of powering on. I've never checked with anyone else though, I assumed it worked for everyone because it worked for me.

    13. Re:Why it existed by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I have a Motorola L6 connected to Telstra Australia and it works just fine. I dont have to set the time on it, nor do I have to change anything when daylight saving comes on, the network/towers do both.

    14. Re:Why it existed by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      If you really did it, then you deserve to catch language. Or some other virus.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    15. Re:Why it existed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phones appear to sync hour on startup.. Don't forget to reboot when changing time zones.

  59. CFL Time and Temperature by schweinhund · · Score: 1

    407.646.31xx

    Formerly of Barnett Bank ...

    This reminds me of those numbers you could call years ago (Winter Park Public Library, anyone?) and hear a tape recorder playing childrens' stories. Long gone.

  60. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by iabervon · · Score: 1

    There's always AT&T teleconference systems. They'll get a voice asking for a password they don't have before they get to anything important, and that's unlikely to go away any time soon. You can find a ton of them by searching for corporate announcement conference call info.

  61. Excellent! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Well, what really happened is that Bill and Ted took the payphone away, AND the time, too!

  62. Ah, the memories... by qzulla · · Score: 1

    Corporations keep stealing my childhood memories. Many a time I dialed popcorn to get the time.

    Don't laugh. That was the number.

    qz

    1. Re:Ah, the memories... by stonefry · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can also dial POP-PPPP. Not sure if other numbers work.

  63. Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the service had already stopped in most states, but Nevada and California -- with their large rural and unmapped areas -- were still holding out, should the lost motorist or weary hiker need to know the time of day.
    I am lost in the uncharted areas of California or Nevada and the most important thing I need to know is the time? Are these hikers and lost motorists navigating with a sextant?

    If I have access to a phone to call the time, shouldn't I be able to call for help?
    --
    I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    1. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      In California at least (probably other states too), highways/freeways (in cities, maybe elsewhere) have "emergency phones" dotting along the shoulder. I've never used one before, but there's a good chance you get an emergency operator. Hell, they probably even have the time.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but are you male or female? Everyone knows that a real man will not ever, under any circumstances whatsoever ask for directions, even if he is lost in the wilderness, starving and dying of thirst ;)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    3. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      If you're lost or broken down or injured on the CA freeways, better hope you've got a cell phone -- the state is busy removing all the callboxes, because after all everyone must have a cellphone, with all the emergency numbers they could ever need already programmed in, right?

      Well, I don't have a cell phone. My neighbour doesn't. Lots of people don't. Lots of people don't need a phone surgically implanted in their ears, nor the $40/mo. bill for service we don't ordinarily need. Now if we're in trouble along the freeway, we're dependent on passing motorists -- all of whom will expect us to use our own cell phones, not bother them about it.

      As to the Time service, it's useful considering how frequent power outages have become in California. Not everyone has a WWV-enabled clock, either.

      "Progress" isn't supposed to be about FORCING everyone to march to the current drumbeat, but that's what it's become.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by HugeFatty · · Score: 1

      I am lost in the uncharted areas of California or Nevada [...]

      It's not uncharted, you lost the chart.

      --


      I am clearly fatter than you.
    5. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      The call boxes were paid for by the counties. The result being that the poorer counties, like Modoc and San Joaquin where the call boxes would have been most useful, couldn't afford to buy them. It might be nice to call a tow truck from where you're broken down on 880 between Hegenberger and 98th, but you know a car will be along shortly. 395 is another story.

      --
      Notmysig
    6. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks, didn't know that. Likely explains why the callboxes are close together in some areas and miles apart in others, too.

      But it seems stupid to dismantle a working system that is already paid for... I still think the culprit is lobbying from cellphone providers who see callboxes as potentially cutting into their revenue, because now if you don't have a cell phone, OMG you could be stranded without help forever, and you wouldn't want to flag down a passing motorist, after all they could be a mass murderer!!

      Of course they'll probably trash them on top of it, instead of giving them to the poorer counties, which ISTM are also those where cell phone coverage is most likely to be spotty or even entirely absent.

      Side note: during my first trip thru California, back in 1971, we couldn't sit by the side of the road for 5 minutes without 3 or 4 cars stopping to see if we needed anything. Now, you could be visibly dying all over the pavement and no one would stop. Crime rates and the level of public paranoia, as usual, have little in common. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      Lots of people don't need a phone surgically implanted in their ears, nor the $40/mo.

      Here in Europe most people who want a mobile phone but not the bill settle with a card service where you have the phone and a SIM card, and you buy credit either by visiting a kiosk near your home or by calling and charging your credit card, or via Web banking. Not sure whether this kind of service exists in the US.

    8. Re:Lost Motorist or Weary Hiker? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you can get prepaid cell phone service here, tho the ones I've heard about have the nasty habit of zeroing out your account every 6 months. So they're use it or lose it.

      Any cell phone can call 9-1-1, even if you don't have an account, but if you're just stuck by the side of the road, that isn't considered a bona fide emergency, and you might get a 5-figure bill as a result.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  64. Atomic Clock Receivers by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Atomic clock receivers aren't hard to construct. You can easily modify an old MW/LW radio. Wire the antenna and oscillator gangs of the tuning capacitor in parallel and the MW and LW coils of the ferrite rod in series. This should be enough to get you down to 60kHz, but if you need a few extra pF then two adjacent tracks on a piece of breadboard are as good as anything. Feed the output into a digital storage oscilloscope. Adjust the timebase so it takes a minute to cross the screen. Real geeks can decode it by eye :)

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  65. Jackson4-8123 by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Here in Connecticut anyway it's still on from the local telco.
    And the fact that I remember the exchange mnemonic tells you roughly how old I must be.
    It still sounds like the time lady, whom I last heard on Wait Wait Don't Tell Me, but I believe she's passed on.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  66. AT&T stops time... by cyberfunkr · · Score: 1

    ...But thanks to their roll-over minutes you can keep using that time for up to a year.

  67. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by WMD_88 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NIST: 303 499 7111
    Gives time in UTC, so you'll have to shift over for your time zone.

  68. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    And (209) 239-8181, if you don't mind the spiel.

  69. Not in Washington DC area... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    301-844-1212 is still the time number here. Before we went to 10-digit numbers everywhere, it was 844-****

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  70. it has not stopped in Maryland by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    Despite TFA's claim that only California and Nevada still have this service, when I dial 410-844-1212, I still get "At the tone, the time will be....". So it persists in Maryland, at least for the time being.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  71. Business efficiency... by MacDork · · Score: 1

    Sad to see it go? I've never even heard of this until today. It sounds like something that's been obsolete for more than a decade, easily. I wonder how much they spent maintaining this service, and how much of my bill reflected that? They should have shut down this service and auctioned the equipment to the nostalgic years ago. People say government is inefficient, but I believe wastefulness is a characteristic of any giant hierarchal entity. This news certainly helps support that belief.

    1. Re:Business efficiency... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually charged for these calls, you'd get a separate charge for "information services" on your phone bill if you called these numbers. I would have thought they made money from it, but I guess not.

      If you never used this, tell me how did you set your clocks? I'm guessing you didn't have broadband to use NTP ten years go.

    2. Re:Business efficiency... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      I can't say I could understand why anyone would bother to waste the money on that type of call. 10 years ago was hardly the stone age. Take a look at the screenshot for Network Time for the System 7 Macintosh. It's copyright 1990. You don't need broadband to get your time. Not now or even 10 years ago. You could easily get time with seconds accuracy from CNN, The Weather Channel, and the station programming channel at any time of day. Regardless, I don't see how this is headline news here.... Must be a slow news day :-)

    3. Re:Business efficiency... by onepoint · · Score: 1

      from the point of view of a person that has gone without electricity and phone service for 3 or 4 days, it's nice to confirm that you are not nut's and it is mid afternoon. it's just something that you would take for granted and only used when you needed it ( about 10 times in my lifetime ). I like the British version of it on he shortwave.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  72. ...nor in NJ/908 by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    976-1616. (still 7-digit dialing over here)

  73. replacing "dial time" with "say 'ntpdate'" by ekimminau · · Score: 1

    How long is it going to be before someone writes a little script that chops off the first 15 or so characters from the output of "ntpdate" and formats it into something like: say "The current date is " MMM DD; say "The current time is " HH MM "and " SS "seconds" say "you dweeb".

    --
    Armaments, 2-9-21 And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade' N
    1. Re:replacing "dial time" with "say 'ntpdate'" by Random832 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't do the "at the tone" thing. You'd basically have to figure out in advance how long it will take to say, add a couple seconds in case of error (or maybe figure out how long it takes to say with "January twenty-seventh" and "eleven-fifty-seven and fifty-seven seconds", and make sure the time you allow is long enough for that. And getting the beep to start at the _exact_ right moment will be no picnic on a non-realtime OS.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    2. Re:replacing "dial time" with "say 'ntpdate'" by ekimminau · · Score: 1

      BEEEP! At the tone the date was foo and the time was bar ....

      --
      Armaments, 2-9-21 And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade' N
  74. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the power goes out at my house a few times a year (because i feed off an antiquated pg&e substation which keeps catching on fire). after the power comes back on i call pop-corn from my kitchen speakerphone so that i can sync my microwave and oven clocks. i think before they shut this off, at&t should require pg&e to fix their damn substation! now what am i gonna do? my ntp server and computers are all up/down stairs. where do i get a microwave with wifi and an ntp client?

  75. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by evilbessie · · Score: 1

    It's the far more sensible 123 over here in the UK and it's still going far as I know.

  76. For a great many lonely men by Dorceon · · Score: 1

    this was their only way to get a woman to give them the time of day.
    Thank you, I'll be here all week!

    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  77. Bet the Billing Department wasn't notified.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I wonder if they will continue to get any gov subsidies that were meant to pay for this service for all?

  78. Not To Worry by QAPete · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Not to worry. Apple has announced they are well into development of "iTime", which will utilize a much cooler, more advanced touch screen interface. No word yet on whether you'll be able to replace the battery yourself...

  79. Dead enough by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Except that's a toll call for most of us. Unless you have a cell phone plan with unlimited long distance. In which case you just have to look at your cell phone to get the exact time.

    Come to think of it, cell phones are probably the main reason nobody calls POPCORN any more. I'd like to say "the Internet", but in fact few people have the time clients on their desktops properly configured.

    1. Re:Dead enough by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      How much of a toll could that possibly be?

      Pick up the phone. Listen to the time. Hang up. 20 seconds max.

      Do phone companies even charge for calls that short anymore?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Dead enough by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's probably not a lot of money (maybe 25 cents if you have a really horrible long-distance plan). But yes, anybody who doesn't have flat rate long distance gets billed for every call, even calls less than a minute. And most plans round up. So 20 seconds is the same as 60.

      Not that anybody cares. There are better ways to get the time. Cell phones, radio watches, GPS devices...

      It's interesting that you're unaware of long distance billing issues. Did you grow up only using systems that don't charge tolls? (Cell phones, IP phones, and lately long distance companies have gone to flat rates in order to compete.) If so, that makes you a post-Ma-Bell person and me a dinosaur!

  80. And you can get the weather too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The neat thing about some time service phone numbers was that you could get the local weather too.

    Most folks don't realize that you can do this quite easily with your cellphone, and you don't even need an Internet connection to do it! Here's how:

    1. Take your cellphone out, and hold it very steady.
    2. Extend the antenna.

    If the cellphone is wet, then it's raining out. If the antenna jiggles, it's windy.

    HTH.

  81. Ain't buying no TV with no commie Euro tech! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    How does everyone set their clocks without calling time? Teletext. Teletext never really took off in the US for some reason.

    The WP article mentions that the FCC forcing manufacturers to include "closed captioning" (audio subtitle) technology made them unwilling to also include Teletext. However, that was in the early 1990s, by which time Teletext was 15 years old anyway, so this must have been merely the final straw and doesn't explain its initial failure there.

    This surprises me because (a) It was very successful in Europe, particularly the UK and (b) it's not like it was replaced by a similar rival service. In fact, Teletext was able to support subtitles/captioning- this is how it was done in the UK, so unless the US C.C. service was much cheaper to implement at the time, they could have done it that way.
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Ain't buying no TV with no commie Euro tech! by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Funny how that article blames Zenith, considering I had a Zenith TV with teletext support. Never did see anybody broadcasting anything on it though.

  82. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by Spillman · · Score: 1

    Or you could just tune your shortwave radio to 2.5, 5, or 10 MHz, and get the same thing.

    You do have a shortwave radio don't you?

    --
    sig?
  83. Before it's too late by froschmann · · Score: 1

    Make a call:

    (213) 853-1212

    That's the number. I'm too young to have ever had to do this, but it was pretty cool.

  84. I hope they archive it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope they archive these for history.

  85. I'm sort of bummed... by edashofy · · Score: 1

    Ah, another piece of childhood nostalgia gone. Who will I call to test if my landline is working now?

    I always remembered the SoCal number (853-1212) because it makes a 'T' (like Time) on the telephone keypad. And now my Grandmother has to stop reminding me that the number is "UL3-1212," as she is wont to do.

  86. Where I grew up by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    it was pop-corn

    then in the 80's pop-corn cost $0.10
    In the 90's $0.25

    Today $3.95, guess its time to by a watch

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  87. Because its sooo expenice.. by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    ::sheash:: With all the money AT&T makes you would think they could set up an answering machine with the time on it.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  88. for Atlanta readers, and punk fans by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1

    This is relevant mostly for Atlanta readers here:

    1. 770-455-7141 continues to provide time and is all I've used for 20 years. Of course you can call it from outside Atlanta too, and these days the long distance charge is negligible ...

    2. Jane Barbe's son David Barbe was one of the guys in Mercyland (late 80's Atlanta punk band), then joined Bob Mould (of Husker Du) to form Sugar, and these days runs his own recording studio in Athens GA.

  89. UU Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for the Unreasonable UbuntuDupe release.

  90. If only it were possible... by BJD3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if someone could develop a global system of flying objects that could somehow measure the contours of the earth.

    Then, finally, we would be able to discover what actually lies in these vast 'unmapped' areas of 'nevada' and 'california'.
    Imagine the possibilities.

  91. Ooo.... Now I can finally get 1-909-POP-CORN by phamlen · · Score: 1

    From the article, it mentions that the 767 prefix is now available (used to be 767 followed by any four digits would give you the time so they wouldn't allow numbers starting with 767)

    Hmmm, someone could get the telephone number POP-CORN (767-2676)... more interestingly, it can also be used to spell "POR" so someone could also get 1-909-PORNSTAR (Suggested ad tagline: "Dial 1-909-PORNSTAR and leave off the last R 'cause it's all XXX!")

  92. Not too upset by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

    As an expat living in the US I always call home to check the time anyway - the AT&T service never seems to have it right.

    --
    Squirrel!
  93. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

    I do, but the thread is about phone services.
    And you forgot 15 and 20MHz. :p

  94. But the police will allow ONE phone call by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    ...and now AT&T is taking that number away from me *sniff*

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  95. UL3-1212 by n6kuy · · Score: 1

    At least that what it was in Pacific Bell territory in So Cal when I was growing up. Seems to me General Telephone had a different number... can't remember what it was though...

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  96. Suspected it might not always work by benhocking · · Score: 1

    It seems that very few things that you think are true for all states actually are. However, I would have expected nothing (i.e., no response) before I would have expected it getting re-routed to local information. You mom doesn't happen to live in Colorado, does she? ;)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Suspected it might not always work by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      No...she lives in Florida, but the person she wanted info about lives in Colorado. The operator was looking up cities in Florida without my mom mentioning any state...when this wasn't working, she asked "This is in Florida right?" My mom says "No, Colorado...(pause)...oh, this is the local information service?" After that got cleared up she was able to get the information anyway.

  97. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  98. GrandCentral by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    It might be neat to have a grand central account on one of those. The beta is great- a free number! Check out the poet line.

  99. In time... by BentPenguin · · Score: 1

    This will save them thousands of dollars. Not that they've got anything to be bitter about.

  100. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Or you could just use GPS time. You do have GPS don't you?

  101. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by putaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    867-5309

  102. Typical by mattr · · Score: 1

    AT&T used to mean something besides money grubbing it seems.

    Personally I use the local time voice service often, whenever my cellphone stops working. It is 117 on my NTT DoCoMo phone, just like 113 is for emergency repair, and 110 is for police.

    Once the U.S. starts getting more advanced phone networks you will wish you had it, you'd be surprised how quickly your phone can get turned off for a lapsed $250 3G bill. And just last week at a big fireworks show all the phones stopped working (you could get through once in about 50 calls) due too not enough virtual circuits being available for the crowds. With time, you can tell if you are really on the network or if your phone is broken.

    I wonder whose time these services use in the U.S. (I'll be buying the new 905i when it comes out in October/November since it will be their most advanved model that can be used in the U.S. ...most WorldWing models seem to work everywhere except the U.S.).

  103. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened?

    Does 900-410-TIME (8463) no longer work? Last I checked, that was the pay-per-call service associated with the U. S. Naval Observatory.

  104. Kinda sad by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    I don't know when I learned about POPCORN, but I've used it for years. As a telco installer (Cisco phones), I use it regularly to busy out lines to test things like DSP resources, etc. are really available. I called the number a half dozen times tonight turning up another bank branch. It's nice to have a free number to call that won't ring busy nor bug someone.

    You'd think they could just send POPCORN to a MoH source multicasting the same thing over and over. I understand the need to get the prefixes back, but you could still keep the POPCORN one and give the other numbers back.

  105. Coincidental fortune by nucal · · Score: 1

    At the bottom of the page:

    "Our vision is to speed up time, eventually eliminating it." -- Alex Schure

  106. Funny story by cobyrne · · Score: 1

    Many moons ago, I was involved in a project that required very accurate time (1 microsecond or better). We purchased a GPS with a 1-pulse-per-second output for this. The problem I had was that whereas I had these wonderfully sharp accurate pulses on each second, I wasn't quite sure WHICH second they were referring to!

    The GPS manual wasn't that great, but I implemented what I thought was the correct solution. I then checked it against NTP time and - bingo - agreement! I then checked it against the phone company's clock and - hmmm - I was one second fast. So I checked it against a radio time signal and, once again, agreement.

    So I called the phone company. Unfortunately, the person who maintained the clock was out, so I had to talk to his secretary. She was astonished - "why do you care that the clock is one second out!?". So I explained to her that one second was a big deal when I was trying to be accurate to a millionth of a second. After much scratching of heads, she finally said to me "Oh! Do you want me to change the time?!". The astonishment was now mine.

    As one of my colleagues said - "you should have said yes - I'm late with my project!".

    On a side note - the radio time source I used was Radio Moscow (I was working in the west of Ireland at the time, and that was the strongest time signal I could receive with the radio set I had). I noticed that the time from Radio Moscow was 11 milliseconds "late". Of course the reason was because I was about 3,300km from Moscow - I had just inadvertently measured the speed of light!

  107. soo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...were you trying to allude to bill and ted's excellent adventure with those two museum pieces, or was that just delightful happenstance!?

  108. Hm? Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted the name calling the other coward did was out of sorts; but why was that modded troll while the parent was (even if they thought they weren't) being rather rude and offensive to someone they new little to nothing about and was rated funny? Should both cases of rudeness, and insults been treated the same, or are just inappropriate comments about voice actors who are now in their seventies considered funny?

  109. Re:It's more than sad. Help! Anyone got alternativ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WeatherCron, one of the companies mentioned in the story, still operates a time/temp number from their flagship offices. They use a man's voice rather than the women's voices they used on the phone company recordings.

    Anyway, the number is 770-455-7141 as it has been for decades.

    Of course the NIST number mentioned by some people is another good option. We all have free long distance so that should not be an issue for anyone.

    Personally I miss the OLD WWV voice, before they computerized it back in the late 80s. I forget his name. Don somebody? They used to say he was from Atlanta... and both of these big companies were from Atlanta. Makes me wonder how much of that work was going on here.

  110. Sounds like one of those new "features" by benhocking · · Score: 1

    This is probably the result of an "upgrade" in order to improve efficiency. The old (###)555-1212 numbers now get rerouted to a central location. That central location looks at the area code of the person calling instead of the area code called. Progress! :(

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  111. Wrong name by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    Time? No, it's POP-CORN!

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  112. I do use a similar service by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    I am in Europe and one of my landlines is ISDN, which features an automated stream from my provider displaying the current time and date on both of my two ISDN terminals's screen continuously. In addition, I also have access to a voice time service. I make good use of both services every day, primarily the stream service, as I have found it much better to use the ISDN terminals as clocks instead of having dedicated clocks and remembering to change the DST settings or synchronise the time. The ISDN time stream automatically synchronises whenever I make a call, so I don't have to worry about DST. The voice service has also been proved useful as well in various ocassions, especially when out of my home office, although my mobile phone has a similar GSM time stream. I certainly wouldn't like to see phone time services going away, as they are useful for making sure what the correct and official time is.