Slashdot Mirror


Demonoid Torrent Tracker Shut Down by CRIA

An anonymous reader writes "As of Tuesday, 25th September 2007, Demonoid is currently down, with no prior warnings from any moderators of the site. Both the main torrent page and the forum (fora) are no longer accessible. It is still possible to ping and trace the IP address of the site and it locates itself as in Canada. As of 6:45pm EST on 9-25-07, SSH and SMTP services are no longer active. Torrentfreak.com has since reported this is due to legal actions from the CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association) who ordered Demonoid's ISP to shut down the site."

222 comments

  1. CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, we just went somewhere else.

    1. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by radiojock · · Score: 5, Informative

      Moderators: PLEASE check the stories BEFORE you allow them to post. According to the folks on demonoid IRC, they were NOT shut down by the CRIA.

      Geez slashdot is turning into DIGG where every moron can post "the truth"

    2. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Nah, the big difference between /. and Digg is that on /., only a few morons control all the information.

      Oh, and there's no self correction facility (Slash it?)

    3. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...slashdot is turning into DIGG where every moron can post "the truth"" see above
    4. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by happyemoticon · · Score: 3, Funny

      And as far as comments and moderation go, Digg's level of discourse is about what you'd expect from an MMORPG.

    5. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by Keebler71 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Moderators: PLEASE check the stories BEFORE you allow them to post.

      You must be new here...

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    6. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by SQL+Error · · Score: 2, Funny

      Moderators: PLEASE check the stories BEFORE you allow them to post.
      Yeah, whose bright idea was it to make this "CmdrTaco" guy a mod anyway?
    7. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Moderators: PLEASE check the stories BEFORE you allow them to post. According to the folks on demonoid IRC, they were NOT shut down by the CRIA.

      Geez slashdot is turning into DIGG where every moron can post "the truth"


      You get a hearty second from me on this. It just seems that a lot of stuff on Slashdot these days is FUD and fearmongering. Just this week we had a big story on how evil Apple was going to deliberately brick your iPhone if you unlocked. I am not an Apple apologist or fanboy by the way and I own no Apple products, not even a iPod.

      The real story apparently was that Apple tested its new firmware update on the iPhone on some unlocked iPhones and found that it bricked them. Apple decided to warn people - "Hey, if you unlocked your iPhone, you better skip this firmware update". Of course no good deed goes unpunished and the tin foil hat brigade swung into full force about how "evil Apple" had deliberately decided to brick unlocked iPhones in conjunction with some sort of unholy alliance with AT&T. Sadly, the truth seems to have been lost in this discussion.

      Then we have the story that Slashdot had to update from earlier this week about how some open source program supposedly sent all kinds of private information to evil overlords who would use it in nefarious ways before the update arrived that said that the program in question only sent a few bits of information that in no way could identify its user. All you have to do any more these days is post something untrue but sure to ruffle some feathers and it shows up immediately.

    8. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's our excuse? Oh yeah, we don't make excuses we flaunt our faults here.

    9. Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

      Except that on Digg, this story was posted, then buried, and more accurate information was posted shortly after.

  2. So I guess... by Klaidas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    CRIA is the new RIAA?
    Well, in a "public appearance" sense.

    1. Re:So I guess... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, just the RIAA, but in Canada, eh?

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:So I guess... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Hooray for the MAFIAA!
      I really appreciate how the MAFIAA is saving us all the costs on judges, juries and executioners.
      Who needs an expensive legal system when the MAFIAA will find you guilty for free?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:So I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck since when can an "Association" order anything? Don't they have to file suit? They probably said take it down, or you'll be listed on the claim as well.

    4. Re:So I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'all post that again now, ya hear?

    5. Re:So I guess... by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      More like a wannabe RIAA for Canada.

      For the most part, CRIA is ignored.

    6. Re:So I guess... by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      Not even wannabe. They are one and the same. They represent very few Canadian artists if any. The Barenaked Ladies and Sarah McLaughlin (sp?) have spoken out against them.

    7. Re:So I guess... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, it's just a matter of time before groups such as this manage to have themselves granted de facto police powers, or have our respective governments set up an "International Bureau of Copyright Enforcement", and directly divert police resources (and our tax dollars) to their ends.

      We'll see what Demonoid's operators are made of, if this is true. Who knows, maybe they'll relocate to Sweden.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:So I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they do relocate and honestly, the way the MPAA, CRIA and like associations are acting it's like they don't want to adapt to the changing world. Frigging dinosaurs, if you don't want to adapt and try to use technology to your advantage hurry up and die.

  3. Legal? by Aladrin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Didn't we just decide that stea^W copyright infringement was legal in Canada since they pay all those taxes on everything that might be used for it?

    Maybe it's still illegal to provide, if not infringe...

    I dunno, maybe if the article had more words than the summary, I'd have some clue.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Legal? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, my bad. The page only partially loaded the first time. There's more words there, but still no real information.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Legal? by Hemogoblin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Coincidentally, the CRIA is now opposing the private copying levy.

      The Canadian Recording Industry Association this week quietly filed documents in the Federal Court of Appeal that will likely shock many in the industry. CRIA, which spent more than 15 years lobbying for the creation of the private copying levy, is now fighting to eliminate the application of the levy on the Apple iPod since it believes that the Copyright Board of Canada's recent decision to allow a proposed tariff on iPods to proceed "broadens the scope of the private copying exception to avoid making illegal file sharers liable for infringement."- Michael Geist
    3. Re:Legal? by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually the blog has done CNN's trick (or is it Fox's trick?) in that they assert a fact that they cannot prove, and so had a question mark at the end. They haven't said the CRIA is responsible, they've ASKED if the CRIA is responsible.

      At this point the only thing we know is that demonoid was hosted in Canada, is currently down and the admins of the website haven't made any official comment.

      It simply makes no sense that CRIA would be responsible for this. The Canadian MPAA would make more sense as I believe they haven't blundered into the situation the Canadian professional music industry has.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    4. Re:Legal? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Technically, it is the importers/manufacturers of blank media who pay the levy, but I'm sure they pass the cost onto the consumers. Torrenting a recording is a completely different animal than burning a copy of a friend's cd.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Legal? by This_Is_My_Happening · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't we just decide that stea^W copyright infringement was legal in Canada... Downloading is legal in Canada. Uploading is still a grey area.
      --
      God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
    6. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torrenting a recording is a completely different animal than burning a copy of a friend's cd.

      Not really. Either way you are copying the bits from one storage device to another.
    7. Re:Legal? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's crap. That means they prefer to sue people than being paid money. And don't tell me that they'd lose more than they gained, a levy on EVERY recording media is more than they imagine (and know) they're losing.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    8. Re:Legal? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why the ISP shut their site down. Since when is the CRIA a legal authority? They aren't part of law-enforcement. Why is an ISP taking marching orders from a private company or organization, rather than a court?

    9. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Actually the blog has done CNN's trick (or is it Fox's trick?) in that they assert a fact that they cannot prove, and so had a question mark at the end.

      Or they prefix the headline with "Report:". Such as this example from today's ESPN:

                    Reports: Marion wants out of Phoenix

      The news, I mean, media organization is merely passing on information
      and not taking responsibility for its accuracy.

      >...assert a fact^Wrumor that they cannot prove.

      Fixed. Sorry, I had to say it.

    10. Re:Legal? by Emetophobe · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I've read, the demonoid servers got hosed and the admins have to restore everything from backups. The TorrentFreak article is just baseless speculation at this point and slashdot isn't helping by spreading these rumours.

    11. Re:Legal? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Not really. Either way you are copying the bits from one storage device to another.

      While true, there is the whole issue of who has access to the bits. Burning a copy of a CD is a unicast operation in which the bits are copied onto media for which a levy has been paid. Nobody else has access to the data. Torrenting is a multicast operation in which the bits are made publicly available, onto media which (for the most part) no levy has been paid.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:Legal? by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Sources?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    13. Re:Legal? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Actually the blog has done CNN's trick (or is it Fox's trick?) in that they assert a fact that they cannot prove, and so had a question mark at the end. They haven't said the CRIA is responsible, they've ASKED if the CRIA is responsible. It's commonly used by all major media outlets now. The Daily Show dubbed the tactic Punctuation Punditry. I tried tagging a couple Slashdot articles that did this a while ago with "punctuationpunditry", but I don't think it worked.
    14. Re:Legal? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      http://ph.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070925053950AAUC0Ep

      We, at demonoid, had a system problem which will force us to restore everything from backup. The disks are pretty much empty right now and until we are able to upload the backup and set up everything up, we have to close down.We will be back as soon as possible. Sorry for the inconvenience and don't worry, everything will be fine.

      I trust that anonymous source about as much as I trust TorrentFreak.

      http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Torrent_tracker_Demonoid.com_shut_down_by_Canadian_Recording_Industry_Association

      Some within the company have suggested that it all simply is a case of heavy maintenance.

      Demonoid IRC transcript: http://www.thecircuitbox.com/demonoid/

      Basically, no one knows at this point since the demonoid admin still hasn't said anything. It could be the CRIA, it could be extended maintenance/downtime. This is all just speculation at this point until Deimos (the owner/admin of demonoid) speaks up. I'm more likely to believe it's a server problem than the CRIA though.

    15. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to assume that either Diemos emptied the coffers and hauled ass, or was forced to shut down and keep his mouth shut until directed to bark as part of an agreement to stay out of jail.

      That "We at Demonoid..." is obvious rubbish.

      I find it hard to believe they don't have the core installation on a mirrored array.
      Even if they didn't, it would take nothing to put up a temporary page explaining the situation.

      To not do so is rude to their user base, and would cost them money from advertisers who choose not to deal with flakes - so I don't believe the "drive crash" horse shit for a second.

      Sounds a lot like Overgrow to me.

    16. Re:Legal? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      It looks like I was wrong afterall...

      We received a letter from a lawyer represeting the CRIA, they were threatening with legal action and We need to start blocking Canadian traffic because of this. If you reside in Canada, that is the reason you are being redirected to this message. Thanks for your understanding, and sorry for any inconvenience.

      I get redirected to that page when I try to visit demonoid. It looks like us Canadians just got screwed over hard... It looks like I'll have to use a proxy if I want to access demonoid now.

  4. Finger in the dyke... by downix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This action is akin to putting a finger in the dyke, but there are thousands, if not millions of other holes. You will run out of fingers (read funding) long before you ever patch up the holes in the wall that is DRM. We are in an era where the old rules of rights management can not survive. Pandoras Box is open, the cat is out of the bag, you cannot go back without causing more damage, if you can go back at all. Adapt or die.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:Finger in the dyke... by LM741N · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure dykes are just as outraged about DRM as anyone else. But why pick them?

    2. Re:Finger in the dyke... by kaos07 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fingering the dyke? The CRIA is more like a c*ck up the arse.

    3. Re:Finger in the dyke... by jollyreaper · · Score: 0

      This action is akin to putting a finger in the dyke, but there are thousands, if not millions of other holes. More importantly, if the little dutch boy was responsible for putting his finger there, could Slashdot now be held responsible for hosting child pornography?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Finger in the dyke... by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      Hey look, I found this book of cliches...

    5. Re:Finger in the dyke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards ... Checkmate.
      - Zapp Brannigan

    6. Re:Finger in the dyke... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 0

      Don't forget TPB is a hole bigger than both their fists.

    7. Re:Finger in the dyke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying... they need to fist the pirate dyke?

    8. Re:Finger in the dyke... by msormune · · Score: 1

      What does DRM has to do with this? Everyone and their dog knowns torrent sites like demonoid exist only to spread torrents to copyrighted material. There's really no nice way to say it.

    9. Re:Finger in the dyke... by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cack *belongs* up arses.

      Oh, you meant something else. So sorry. ;)

    10. Re:Finger in the dyke... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This action is akin to putting a finger in the dyke, but there are thousands, if not millions of other holes.
      I would appreciate it if you could point me to the direction of an available one.
      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    11. Re:Finger in the dyke... by Seumas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not really. Demonoid was a tremendous private tracker. There aren't a whole lot of those (much less ones that are huge and always have fully seeded content) around like Demonoid. Pirate Bay is fine, if you want to have your machine hammered from all the public trackers you'll continue to be listed as a seeder/peer on for weeks after you've stopped seeding/downloading the file. Not to mention, the crap you have to pour through to find something worthwhile.

      The funny thing is, I used Demonoid a lot. But I mostly downloaded content that had nothing to do with the MPAA or RIAA. It was a great place to find seeded open source ISOs. It was a great place to download doctor who episodes as they came out in the UK instead of waiting 18 months to watch them in America. It was a great place to get very old BBC Radio content. It was a great place to get original Doctor Who episodes, as far back as the show goes (1961-1963).

    12. Re:Finger in the dyke... by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya on that! If you can't find it seeded fully on Demonoid it's likely not worth bothering with. Good community to it too.

    13. Re:Finger in the dyke... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Argh, it's down? I had a couple of precious things I wanted but where to lazy to start fetching, crap :(

      Today is a sad day for an OS X user ;D

    14. Re:Finger in the dyke... by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      lol did anyone actually read this post? It's so full of groupthink with that one misspelling. It's obviously a troll. I'm not sure what kind of response he wanted, but he got a big one xD

  5. Canada by Rhoads47 · · Score: 0

    Blame Canada ['s Recording Industry Association]!

  6. Couldn't resist by trrwilson · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

    1. Re:Couldn't resist by T0wner · · Score: 1

      You read the comments on torrentfreak then? Not so sure about the silence however...

    2. Re:Couldn't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I fingered^H^H^H^felt a great disturbance in the force. As if millions of dykes were...

    3. Re:Couldn't resist by sgant · · Score: 1

      I feel a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, then remembered there are about a billion other sites for torrent files in the world and then they all just yawned and went about their day.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    4. Re:Couldn't resist by chazwurth · · Score: 1
      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
  7. it had to be said by the_fat_kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new dyke fingering overlords.

    ouch. that hurt just to say.

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
    1. Re:it had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new dyke fingering overlords. Well, they probably hate men, so I wouldn't be so happy about that...

    2. Re:it had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like you were getting any either way, what are you complaining about?

    3. Re:it had to be said by the_fat_kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      how do you know I'm a man, you insensitive clod?

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    4. Re:it had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Slashdot, poster replies to himself!

  8. there is some debate here on the demonoid shutdown by bubblah · · Score: 5, Informative

    last night techwag was reporting the same thing based off the torrent freak article, but a commenter pointed to a discussion out on http://www.thecircuitbox.com/demonoid/ which is basically an IRC chat that refutes the CRIA end of the story. The techwag article is here http://techwag.com/index.php/2007/09/25/bad-day-for-bittorrent-demonoid-shut-down/ Yesterday was basically a bad day for Bittorrent, ISOHunt shut down trackers to american users, and demonoid out of service, for what ever reason, either because they were taken down by the ISP or they are having one of their outages that happens randomly, but every time they go down people think they got shut down because they were shut down almost a year ago by BRIEN. There really is no way to tell the truth in the story without getting someone from demonoid to talk about it, and so far, people from demonoid have been very hard to reach. Makes for an interesting story overall though.

  9. No details yet... by pathological+liar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This story is useless without details, and nobody has them yet.

    1. Re:No details yet... by bubblah · · Score: 1

      Exactly, thank you for being more succinct than me in your statement, grin.

  10. Just to clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    TorrentFreak has speculated that they may have been shut down by the CRIA. At present there is absolutely no proof, aside from one article on a dutch blog (which is TF's one and only source).

    1. Re:Just to clarify by apdyck · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I sent some e-mails to Demonoid's hosting provider. Here is what I got:

      Me
      I was wondering if you had any information about the recent disappearance of demonoid.com . I did some research and it would appear that you are hosting the site. Site admins have been unavailable for comment, and there is a gread deal of speculation regarding the site. Are you able to shed any light on this situation?

      Netelligent
      Hello,

      There have been many rumours circulating as to why Demonoid.com is down. We cannot comment any further at this point. Thank you.
      --
      Mohamed Salamé
      Netelligent - Technology Director
      514.369.2209

      Me
      Are you able to confirm or deny if this is a technical issue?

      Netelligent
      I can neither confirm nor deny rumours. If Demonoid hasn't announced anything, then I am not at liberty to say. Thank you.
      --
      Mohamed Salamé
      Netelligent - Technology Director
      514.369.2209
      --
      .sig
    2. Re:Just to clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I don't think demonoid has been shut down by the RIAA. Why?

      The Host is still running and responding to pings, and sending RSTs on port 80, so it looks like only the http server is not running.

      I also fount a smtpd still running on port 25, responding to HELO with 250 demonoid.com, and accepting mail via the usual way and even rejecting mail to nonexistent users :)

      My guess is the host is still running and just has hard or software problems. Nothing the admin couldn't solve when he gets around.

  11. IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.thecircuitbox.com/demonoid/

    For tl;dr types: Torrentfreak made it up, the box is down for unknown reasons. Nobody knows yet. Sorry.

    1. Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nobody knows yet because Deimos hasn't said anything. But from what I see in an nmap scan:

      Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org/ ) at 2007-09-26 09:54 Eastern Daylight Time
      Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54
      Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54, 0.00s elapsed
      Initiating System CNAME DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54
      Completed System CNAME DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54, 0.00s elapsed
      Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 09:54
      Scanning demonoid.com (209.44.123.21) [1697 ports]
      SYN Stealth Scan Timing: About 6.25% done; ETC: 10:03 (0:07:43 remaining)
      Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 10:01, 401.57s elapsed (1697 total ports)
      Warning: OS detection for 209.44.123.21 will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port
      Initiating OS detection (try #1) against demonoid.com (209.44.123.21)
      Host demonoid.com (209.44.123.21) appears to be up ... good.
      Interesting ports on demonoid.com (209.44.123.21):
      Not shown: 1690 filtered ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      21/tcp closed ftp
      22/tcp closed ssh
      80/tcp closed http
      123/tcp closed ntp
      443/tcp closed https
      8000/tcp closed http-alt
      8080/tcp closed http-proxy
      Device type: general purpose
      Running: Linux 2.6.X, OpenBSD 4.X, Sun Solaris 10|8|9
      OS details: Linux 2.6.17.13 (Slackware 11.0, x86), OpenBSD 4.0 (CURRENT) macppc, OpenBSD 4.0 (sparc64), Sun Solaris 10 (SPARC), Sun Solaris 8 (SPARC), Sun Solaris 9 (SPARC), Sun Solaris 9 (x86), Sun Solaris 9 or 10

      OS detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://insecure.org/nmap/submit/ .
      Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 405.503 seconds
                                    Raw packets sent: 5164 (229.400KB) | Rcvd: 76 (3496B)


      It looks like all the ports are firewalled off by the ISP. So while it's not confirmed, it's pretty obvious to anyone knowledgeable in network admin that the ISP firewalled off all the ports at someone's behest. Perhaps the CRIA, perhaps even Deimos himself.

    2. Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      What about that makes you think the ISP closed it off? I don't see a comparison of TTLs from when it worked to when it didn't, and 99% of the ISPs out there, if they're going to close something off, aren't going to send icmp-port-unreachable, they're just going to drop the packet. If I were the non-alarmist type that was also willing to make completely unfounded guesses, I'd say it looks like the box had some problems and came up in a single-user style mode with TCP connectivity.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I don't think so -- the ports shouldn't show at all. But I don't have any TTL comparisons. This was the result of a SYN stealth scan, not a TCP connect scan, FWIW. It shouldn't show any ports at all if the box is hung or booted into single user mount.

    4. Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you get a "closed" response, that means something is answering for that IP. The ISP is unlikely to do this in the event of a takedown, they'll just cut access. Even if they didn't completely cut access and only disallow inbound, they still would more than likely drop the packet instead of returning ICMP port unreachable responses. SYN scans these days are rarely any more penetrating than a regular TCP connect(). If I had a remote box, I'd do my best to make sure it had some kind of connectivity even in single-user mode.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by Slashcrap · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think so -- the ports shouldn't show at all. But I don't have any TTL comparisons. This was the result of a SYN stealth scan, not a TCP connect scan, FWIW. It shouldn't show any ports at all if the box is hung or booted into single user mount.

      Without going into a treatise on the reliability of Nmap results, let me point out one thing. As well as getting a closed result for HTTP, you're also getting the same result for NTP, FTP and at least one HTTP proxy service. If you're assuming that the "closed" result for Port 80 means that it's running a web server but that the port is being blocked, then you also have to assume that it's running as an NTP server. An NTP server isn't something you enable by accident and I doubt the Demonoid server is connected to an atomic clock and providing time services to the rest of the network. So that and the other unexpected ports indicate a strong possibility that your results are inconsistent and useless.

      So while it's not confirmed, it's pretty obvious to anyone knowledgeable in network admin that the ISP firewalled off all the ports at someone's behest.

      I would say that someone who assumes a certain explanation is correct based only on running Nmap against a host in a different country is probably not quite as knowledgeable in the field of network administration as they may think.

    6. Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. by bit01 · · Score: 1

      I doubt the Demonoid server is connected to an atomic clock and providing time services to the rest of the network.

      Running an NTP server is an indication of nothing more than a professional administrator who wants accurate time on that machine. It's not inconsistent with the other results in the slightest.

      It depends on the configuration but a common default for clients of distant time services is to act as an ntp server also. A server needs to run on the client so that round trip packet times to the distant time service can be tracked over time and compensated for and it's easy to provide time for the local subnet while it's doing that.

      I'm running an NTP server on my desktop machine right now to get accurate time. In my opinion any ISP and shared system administrator not using NTP or a GPS clock to get accurate time is being unprofessional.

      I would say that someone who assumes a certain explanation is correct based only on running Nmap against a host in a different country is probably not quite as knowledgeable in the field of network administration as they may think.

      Hmmmm. ;-)

      ---

      Stop using tab characters in your code!

  12. Too bad... by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

    While there are tons of trackers like TPB or Mininova, Demonoid was the best comic book's scans source.
    Let's hope they manage to get back online.

    1. Re:Too bad... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Aye.
      Probably 99% of the site benefit to me.
      I was so glad to find a source for the comics I grew up with (Adam Strange and others)... most of which either are or should be out of copyright after 45 to 50 years. The only way to get them hard copy would have been prohibitively expensive if even possible since many issues are not for sale often.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that as a registered user or something? Because I hit their old torrent policy and search restrictions all the time, and their registration is never open.

    3. Re:Too bad... by trenien · · Score: 1

      Well, back to irc to get the comics...

  13. Speculation by Ilex · · Score: 4, Informative

    The latest speculation I heard on Torrentfreak 5 hours ago was that Demoniod was down due to a hardware failure and not a MAFIAA Hit squad. I haven't seen any statements from CRIA crowing about their victory which you would expect if they were really responsible.

    1. Re:Speculation by Stu101 · · Score: 1

      A singular server for a site that big (and I assume cash positive) is a bit silly. Although I guess it could be other stuff too.

      --
      http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
  14. hmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the Pirate Bay's legal troubles a while back. Only this time the whiners got their way. There's more than just music on those sites you know. CRIA idiots...

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:hmm by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      There's more than just music on those sites you know. That's neither here nor there as its legal to download and upload music thanks to the CD tax. It can't be the CRIA unless they're simply abusing their power with bogus claims in which case they should be brought to justice.
      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    2. Re:hmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Ahh I'm sorry for the ill-informed post my Canadian friend. Perhaps their servers just crapped-out and the CRIA is a scapegoat.

      --
      The game.
    3. Re:hmm by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "...and the CRIA is a scapegoat."

      Well, at least that means for once the CRIA is doing something useful! Now, where are those tigers??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      its legal to download and upload music thanks to the CD tax

      Please be so kind as to direct us to the official Canadian Government documentation detailing the idea that it is legal to download copyrighted content. (I won't hold my breath)

      they should be brought to justice

      ..and you should no longer be permitted to watch American cop shows.

    5. Re:hmm by shark72 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "That's neither here nor there as its legal to download and upload music thanks to the CD tax."

      Misinformation like this is contributing to the problem.

      • Canadian consumers pay a private copying levy on some recordable media; notably CD-Rs.
      • Copying copyrighted music is legal in some circumstances; in particular, single copies, for private use.
      • The consensus in legal circules is that downloading is thus allowed under the private copying exception. As Michael Geist (who knows far more about Canadian copyright law than anybody here) puts it, "downloading music in Canada for personal purposes is arguably legal as it is compensated activity covered by the private copying levy." (emphasis mine.) But there is no law that states that downloading is legal. It's yet to be tested in court, and I don't think it ever will be, since the money is in chasing after the distributors, not the people doing the private copying.

      As you've demonstrated, this doesn't prevent folks from trying to claim that uploading is legal. The most common argument is that since the default operation of P2P software is to automatically redistribute what's downloaded, then if downloading is a legal act, then anything that happens (including the redistribution) as a result of the downloading must, in turn, be legal. However, this would not even pass the laugh test in court.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    6. Re:hmm by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      A quick Google search reveals this news article. That's as much effort as I'm willing to go to for an Anonymous Coward.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    7. Re:hmm by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      Actually you're incorrect. It has been ruled legal with all sorts of other justifications booted on as well.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    8. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I am not uploading? I just do not close my ports. Is it forbidden not to close my doors at night?

      I am not forcing those people to download it. I am not actively sending a file to some server. It is they who are doing downloading, not me uploading.

  15. personal update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some friends and I heard from demonoid's IRC channel chatter that it wasnt a takedown but rather some hdd's that died - have not seen independent confirmation yet to that effect, other than bubblah's reply post above...

  16. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by Hemogoblin · · Score: 5, Funny

    There really is no way to tell the truth in the story without getting someone from demonoid to talk about it... ...or you could tell me where the server is located. I live in central Canada, so I could just waltz over there and check it for you. It's not like Canada is very big and I can use my dogsled. Problem solved.
  17. I just got my key for it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the irony makes me laugh, the lack of downloads make me cry, sense the lobotomy i cant really feel anger anymore.....

  18. DESU DESU DESU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh god no!
    glad i grabbed the desu while i still had the chance!

  19. CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? by Morgaine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > "this is due to legal actions from the CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association) who ordered Demonoid's ISP to shut down the site."

    I assume it was a judge who ordered Demonoid's ISP to disconnect Demonoid. If a trade organization like CRIA can order an ISP to disconnect a customer directly, then things are extremely bad in Canada.

    But even a judge ordering that seems highly wrong. For example, a judge would not ordinarily order a person's electricity supply to be cut off (unless they're in default of paying their electricity bill of course). Surely here a judge would order Demonoid to immediately drop its site instead, and not order a service supplier to disconnect them upstream. After all, the same Internet feed could be serving many other businesses or private customers perfectly legally.

    Something seems wrong with this (or maybe it's just bad reporting). Otherwise, Canada is in dire straights.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  20. Re:I hate Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about pay for your bandwith like torrent users do?.

  21. Are You Sure? by fringd · · Score: 4, Informative

    As far as I know there is not any strong evidence that CRIA has done anything yet. The server is down, true, but I heard it's just a hard drive failure. Some demonoid people were complaining about the bad journalism reporting that the CRIA shut down demonoid, without anybody from demonoid saying this. Who is the source on this? Some nu.nl article? How do they know anything? Here is an IRC log where demonoid staff give the torrentfreak admin a hard time for reprinting the nu.nl story about the CRIA without having confirmed it in any way. To be fair, at this point in time, the torrentfreak article uses the word "allegedly." maybe they changed it.

    1. Re:Are You Sure? by __aayicd7066 · · Score: 1

      Nu.nl also fails to state the source of their information, but everyone just seems to buy it.

  22. Must be a hardware glitch by Coraon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The CRIA couldnt have shut them down here, I work for one of the few ISP's that could have handled their traffic, and the rules here state that if another company (read *IAA) wants to shut someone down/off the proper responce is to ask them for the MAC address, if they provide it then we shut *IAA off for illigaly obtaining information from our network, if they dont we say get it and call us back.... The big ISP's in Canada LOVE torrent sites, Trackers bring in ALOT of cash to the ISP's that shelter them.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    1. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      the proper responce is to ask them for the MAC address, if they provide it then we shut *IAA off for illigaly obtaining information from our network

      how is getting a MAC address obtaining information illegally? If getting a MAC is illegal then getting the payload portion of a IP packet would also be illegal.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    2. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      my mistake, i was thinking of something else ( src address )

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    3. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those that don't know your revelation - MAC address are stripped by the first router they encounter. So, if the *iaa got a MAC address, they did so internal to the ISP's infrastructure. Therefore, they were illegally inside the ISP's network as there is no other way to obtain this address.

      'Entrapment' is a single edged razor. ;)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      The big ISP's in Canada LOVE torrent sites, Trackers bring in ALOT of cash to the ISP's that shelter them.

      I highly doubt that. ISPs want you to buy their service, but they don't actually want you to use it for anything other than light web and email usage. I use Rogers and they are probably one of the worst offenders when it comes to throttling BitTorrent traffic. I can easily get 700-800kb/sec with certain web sites or ftps, yet I usually only get 25-50kb/sec with BitTorrent if I'm lucky. If ISPs loved BitTorrent so much, they wouldn't be throttling it...

    5. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I live in Sweden but anyway here noone is throttling it, and people order expensive fast connections because they download "warez", and then they probably only use it 1% of the time or so anyway so it's still a win for the isp.

    6. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      What ISP do you work for? I've got a quasi-legal project (if YouTube is legal than my project is legal) that I've been working on but need an ISP where I can get servers with at least 1TB of space each and a fast Internet connection with lots of alloted monthly bandwidth. About the best I've found here offers 5TB of monthly transfer volume for US$400/mo. The biggest problem I have with that is they don't offer any LAN access to transfer data between servers without it coming out of your monthly transfer volume. They also don't offer anything bigger than 1TB of space.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    7. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I've got a quasi-legal project (if YouTube is legal than my project is legal)

      A suggestion for you: Read 17 USC 512. Read it very, very carefully. Read every single line. Take notes if it helps. Then you'll know why the web page here is of vital importance to you. And you'll know why YouTube's legality depends on more issues than simply existing.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    8. Re:Must be a hardware glitch by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'll look it over. At this point I'm not to worried about being sued but I am worried about some ISP cutting my service to avoid being sued. I need an ISP that won't scare just because someone's sue happy legal department sends a threat. Mostly the service I have uses BitTorrent and a few clever tricks to make remote backup and restoring of your systems fast and easy. I'd not be surprised though if someone sued for making and distributing unauthorized copies of files even if those files originally came from the person who is receiving them.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  23. Was it the CRIA or RIAA guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it the CRIA or RIAA guy who was shagging the Canadian government official woman?

  24. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Maybe the igloo melted and all the servers got wet.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  25. Interesting. I just checked this morning... by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I know... it's "wikipedia" but still...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonoid_(BitTorrent)

    That's the word I'm seeing. And according to the article, this is essentially speculation.

  26. Re:Finger in the dike... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    This action is akin to putting a finger in the dyke, but there are thousands A dyke is a lesbian. A dike is a dam. No one read the rest of your post because they were distracted by thoughts of lesbians.
    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  27. Re:CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? by Egonis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Action like this is highly unlikely, because within our legal system they cannot (rather, should not) take action with the assumption that you are guilty without first having a full judgement.

    If there were in fact a judgement, given the speed of our legal system, it would be shut down three years from now.

  28. Hurts, but there are other trackers. by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Oh no, Demonoid is shut down! But we still have TPB, Suprnova, and mininova

    1. Re:Hurts, but there are other trackers. by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, lets just list all our favorite trackers so the MAFIAA can shut them down too! :)

      Actually, I would believe this is hardware failure before them being shutdown. Demonoid is always goin down for something.

    2. Re:Hurts, but there are other trackers. by darrenkopp · · Score: 1

      you might, but we don't.

  29. Loss of a Great Obscure Music Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damnation. They had one of the best selections of out-of-print and rare reggae that I knew of. Whatever the reason, I sure hope they get back online. It's real hard to find quality reggae in the middle of the High Plains...

  30. Are we sure by globexdesigns · · Score: 1

    Are we so sure this is true? http://diggdl.googlepages.com/demonoid

  31. What's really going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't jump the gun, I've talked to #demonoid ops and they say nothing has been confirmed. Goto:

    irc://irc.p2p-network.net/demonoid

    #demonoid

  32. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by bubblah · · Score: 1

    ping traceroute to demonoid.com and it will respond to pings, if I was to diagnose it today, it looks like it is data layer on up, could be a database connectivity issue, but then we speculate. Which is fun.

  33. Re:I hate Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you. Mysterious download caps and slow upload speeds are the fault of scumbag ISPs massively over selling their lines. If you're going to bitch, then bitch about the ISPs, and not about people trying to use what they've legitimately paid for.

    If you "need" the bandwidth, pay for a small business package from your ISP. They'll tell you exactly what you're getting, and won't be so restrictive on uploading.

  34. Re:I hate Torrents by Applekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is because of you that there are GB caps and severe upload restrictions on my internet access. As I recall, upload restrictions and bandwidth caps predate Bittorrent by at least 5 years, if not more. Maybe you just need a better ISP: one that will maintain and upgrade their infrastructure as traffic grows instead of just blaming their customers.
    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  35. Re:I hate Torrents by Hatta · · Score: 1

    You people literally took up almost all the network bandwidth at one point for what is, in actuality, a very inefficient distribution mechanisim.

    Find us a more efficient distribution mechanism and we'll use it.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  36. Why I get my news from slashdot ... the comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is truly why I still read slashdot ... Someone can post BS and that'll be refuted in the comments. (anonym because mod-pointed)

  37. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, do you know bob in vancouver?

  38. Without torrent is there a need for high speed? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I pondered this last night.

    For my needs (EQ, email, occasional funny video) a $17 AT&T DSL account would be fine. It's okay because of occasional torrent related surges that I keep my $55 cable line.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Without torrent is there a need for high speed? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yes, because without Bittorrent I'd just use the KAD/eMule networks or simply USENET or FTP for exactly the same purposes.

      Put simply, it doesn't matter if bittorrent vanishes overnight, there's still massive amounts of redundancy in terms of ways to get the content bittorrent provides, stopping bittorrent wont stop demand and as a result it sure as hell aint gonna stop supply.

    2. Re:Without torrent is there a need for high speed? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I get several gigs of email a day. I pull in system updats for half a dozen systems at a time. Etc. I'd need high speed even without BT. As it is, my puny cable, dsl, and T1, connections are wussy enough to keep me from doing useful things with the Internet I could otherwise do. If I had a 100Mb conenction up and down that was affordable I could do some really awesome businesses. It makes me want to move somewhere that has real broadband.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  39. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all...everyone Blames Canada... >:-)

  40. that's what makes it absurd by gambolt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People don't go to demonoid for Britteny Spears. They go for Jazz and Classical recordings that have not been available for purchase in the US for 20 years. They go for medical textbooks. I got a full Principa Mathmatica there for cripe's sake. It's where Americans get 30 year old BBC productions. I'd been wanting to see The Sweeny for years. I'd have paid for it given the chance.

    The copyright Nazis don't give a shit about 90% of what's there and 90% of the people using Demonoid don't give a shit about any of the stuff the copyright Nazis give a shit about.

    1. Re:that's what makes it absurd by pjeremyh · · Score: 1

      The Sweeney is not a BBC production! It was made by Thames Television

    2. Re:that's what makes it absurd by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh come on. Read the comments on any TV show torrent and tell me Demonoid's users are there for medical textbooks. You are, maybe; but most of Demonoid's users are there for TV shows, current hollywood movies, Windows games, and comic books, to judge by the usual output of browsing the new torrents.

    3. Re:that's what makes it absurd by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I use Demonoid mostly to download music of all kinds. I mostly just download anything that comes in a discography. I probably have downloaded around 500GB of music that way. The funny thing is it's so much music that it'd take me several years to listen to it all and probably several decades for me to figure out, and rate, which songs I like and songs I don't. The RIAA bitching that I've stolen their songs would be pointless because I hear most of the songs a lot more often on the radio than I'd ever hear from my own iTunes collection. On the other hand I have discovered, or re-discovered, quite a few songs and artists I like and may buy their music in the future. Having easy access to music and movies is a great form of advertising. I'm more likely to purchase music after downloading it than I'd be if I hadn't downloaded it. The exceptions are the groups' music that I buy on CD anyway because I am a fan and like to collect their stuff.

      I do use Demonoid a lot to find stuff I can't find anywhere else. For example, my little sister wanted a copy of Mr. Boogety to watch for Halloween. It wasn't sold anywhere I could find. Demonoid had it for download. So I downloaded it for her. For my wife I downloaded the Muppets version of the Frog Prince for the same reason. If things aren't available to purchase it can hardly be called piracy to share old copies amongst ourselves.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:that's what makes it absurd by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      absolutely- I also use it if I need a piece of reference material fast for a project- best place for texts and ref material

  41. You got it all wrong - It's all because of Heroes by Mortimer82 · · Score: 1

    Seriously folks, *obviously* all the people wanting Heroes resulted in a sort of Denial of Service effect!

  42. Re:CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    Action like this is highly unlikely, because within our legal system they cannot (rather, should not) take action with the assumption that you are guilty without first having a full judgement.

    If there were in fact a judgement, given the speed of our legal system, it would be shut down three years from now.


    Actually, if the infringed party feels that the infringing party is unduly harming them, they can ask the judge to issue a temporary injunction from operations. However, in that case, the site can remain operational to explain the situation. Of course, the legality of providing links to files, and not files themselves has yet to be tested in Canadian courts.

    It more likely is a hardware failure than anything. When I first tried Demonoid on Monday, the site was returning no data (it was responding to HTTP, however). Tuesday, it was returning connection resets. Blocked for firewalled sites time out, not return no data or connection resets. Heck, if you had torrents running, the torrent tracker server is contactable at the announce URL. If they shut it ALL down, the tracker servers will also be dead, but they're still being scraped normally. (Heck, it appears a few clients with cached torrent files are still connecting...).

    It's not like it hasn't happened before - Demonoid has suffered a hardware failure earlier this year (in June, I believe) - took them 3 or 4 days to get the server to the point of "We had a hardware failure". being posted on the main page. Speculation ran that it was a shutdown, as well.

    (I didn't know Demonoid was Canadian, honestly... either. That's news to me). As for torrents sapping bandwidth - most good clients have bandwidth throttles you can use to prevent you going over your gig limit. Shaw's "draconian" gig limits (30 for "lite", 60 for "regular", 100 for "regular plus", and 160 for "extreme" or so) aren't that bad, really. And Shaw's are known to be draconian. You can calculate the maximum upload rates if you want to not exceed these, but they're still quite reasonable (I believe 10kB/sec (bytes) will get you at most half way through the 60GB limit a month, roughly, if you uploaded 24/7 continually). If it's a private tracker, well, just keep it running and eventually you'll hit 1:1 ratio. May take a few days compared to the 3 hours to download, but oh well.
  43. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, Bob here. What can I do you for? eh?

  44. Re:Finger in the dike... by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

    A dyke is a lesbian.

    I was wondering why I got so aroused by his first sentence.

    This action is akin to putting a finger in the dyke, but there are thousands, if not millions of other holes.

  45. Digg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i always thought the name of digg was funny, in an ironic way. the verb you have to do in order to get anything useful from it.

  46. Re:I hate Torrents by tepples · · Score: 1

    Find us a more efficient distribution mechanism and we'll use it. Mailing recorded DVD-R discs, perhaps?
  47. the REAL answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone from the CRIA found where demonoid was hosting their server, got into the server room all ninja stealth style; and then proceeded to violate the server in an unspeakable fashion.

    SEE? THE CRIA IS RESPONSIBLE!

  48. Ratio problem? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If it's a private tracker, well, just keep it running and eventually you'll hit 1:1 ratio. May take a few days compared to the 3 hours to download, but oh well. So what do you do when you are on the tail end of a torrent's popularity, you leave your client running for a week, and you still can't get up to 100% because there aren't enough other people who want to download the work? There might be a dozen seeders and 0 downloaders.
    1. Re:Ratio problem? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

      So what do you do when you are on the tail end of a torrent's popularity, you leave your client running for a week, and you still can't get up to 100% because there aren't enough other people who want to download the work? There might be a dozen seeders and 0 downloaders.


      You rely on the fact that it's a private tracker, and most (>99%) don't expect you to seed 1:1 for every torrent.

      Get in on one earlier and seed it 2:1 or more. You don't have to stop at 1:1, you know. I've done torrents where I only seeded 0.5 because, like you said, it was all seeders and no leechers. (Rare for Demonoid due to the sheer number of users. I had year-old+ torrents where I still ended up seeding 2:1). Just remember to make it up. Even as a new user the first GB is often "free". Just if you want to download more than that...

      Or, another trick - go the front page and pick a popular torrent you don't care about. Use it to get your ratio above 1:1. Then stop it and delete the file. (Just be mindful about your limit, though - don't go all crazy and download 4GB torrents planning to seed to 2:1!).

      Heck, that's why I liked Demonoid - even the lowest popularity torrent still gets a good bunch of leechers for unknown reasons. But if it wasn't overly large (maybe under 100MB), even at 10kB/s, I'd still have 2.5+:1 over the course of a day. All the little ones add up. Last I checked, I had maybe a 100GB differential over the course of 3 years or so (100GB more upload than downloaded).

      It's the total of upload:download that matters to most private sites, not whether you downloaded 4GB and only uploaded 10MB on one torrent after a week (as long as your ratio can absorb that 4GB without dipping below 1:1).
    2. Re:Ratio problem? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Even as a new user What's the best way to seek invitations to trackers that carry some set of works?

      It's the total of upload:download that matters to most private sites, not whether you downloaded 4GB and only uploaded 10MB on one torrent after a week (as long as your ratio can absorb that 4GB without dipping below 1:1). But because total download equals total upload, it is mathematically impossible for an entire community to keep a ratio above 1:1. Do people who happen to be unlucky enough to like the less popular files have to donate in exchange for download credits?
    3. Re:Ratio problem? by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      But because total download equals total upload, it is mathematically impossible for an entire community to keep a ratio above 1:1


      1:1 isn't required at any private site I know of. Usually .8:1 or even .7:1 is good enough -- as you say, it's impossible for EVERYONE to have 1:1, but when you're dealing with huge volumes of data like demonoid is (and of course some people who just leech and then let their accounts get canceled) keeping a decent ratio is perfectly doable. I obviously can't check my demonoid ratio right now, but I think it's .85:1 or so and it says I'm "one of the good guys".
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:Ratio problem? by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      No bandwidth cap here, so I never go below 2:1. I think my ratio on Demonoid was 2.33 to 1, with somewhere over 100Gb uploaded there alone. I find it highly frustrating that people even debate that point, as it weakens the network for everyone...

      Okay, done preaching.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  49. Re:CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? by apt142 · · Score: 1

    I assume it was a judge who ordered Demonoid's ISP to disconnect Demonoid. If a trade organization like CRIA can order an ISP to disconnect a customer directly, then things are extremely bad in Canada.
    The details are scarce here. We only have the word of one source that the CRIA is involved at all. Given the state of such shaky evidence, wouldn't the next hypothesis be that it is not legal troubles at all?

    I mean, backhoes have been attempting the take down of the internet for quite some time. (Those big one armed bastards!)

    My point being, what's the use of discussing this without any further information? We're just speculating until we have it.
  50. /. is now digg? by TheSpengo · · Score: 0

    Alright, here's an example of when you should check your sources before posting a news article. I thought this level of stupidity was reserved for Digg.com, but I guess I was mistaken. The site is temporarily offline due to hardware maintenance in their servers. It will probably be back up in a day or two.

    --
    Weaksauce as they say...
    1. Re:/. is now digg? by tkinnun0 · · Score: 1

      Source?

    2. Re:/. is now digg? by TheSpengo · · Score: 0

      Source would be conversing with @s in #demonoid on p2p-net.

      --
      Weaksauce as they say...
  51. what a joke by HipPriest93 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Without torrent is there a need for high speed?"

    Are you dumb? P2P services like Soulseek and E-Mule are showing no signs of being even remotely effected by all this bullshit, and as long as P2P exists and the popularity of video hosting sites like YouTube and Google Video remains unchallenged, there will be a need for high speed.

    This whole article is poorly researched in any case:
    http://www.thecircuitbox.com/demonoid/

  52. Canada, CRIA, P2P, so I guess... by srussia · · Score: 1

    obligatory Blue Rodeo reference is in order:

    Don't tell me I'm wrong,
    'Cause I've been watching every move that you make.

    Oh you got to CRIA, CRIA, CRIA.
    Ah don't you know you've got to CRIA,
    CRIA, CRIA. Oooh
    Oh baby you CRIAAA..

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  53. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

    [...] but every time they go down people think they got shut down because they were shut down almost a year ago by BRIEN. [...]
    BREIN.
    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  54. Re:I hate Torrents by apt142 · · Score: 1

    That would only be more efficient in the following conditions:

    Postage + Disk_Cost
    and

    average_postal_transit_time
    The above conditions would only really be efficient for large amounts of data. Where large amounts of data is relative to your bandwidth and other fellow sharers.

    * I omitted the sender's bandwidth on the the extremely far reaching assumption that the file sharer uploads enough back to the network as he downloads.
    * This is a gross exaggeration and meant more for humor than real world modeling. That's right, laugh it's meant to be funny and geeky.

  55. Demonoid shit: by Kildjean · · Score: 5, Informative

    Demonoid shit:

    Ok folks, here it is. Demonoid is down. It has been for around 1 day 2 hours. The reason is down is unkown. It hasnt been RAIDed, shutdown, terminated, deleted, burned, mamed, or thrown under a bridge. There have been speculation as demonoid.com whereabouts. Well the rurmors are false. A no name site in Netherlands has a blog about Demonoid.com being down. As I don't speak douche, I can not translate. However TorrentFreak Decided upon there own free will to further spread this and rumors. Torrent freak has known to be a sleazy site they post false rumors and hope they turn out true. They do this in order for money and popularity. Quite sad isn't it. To prove this is quite easy:

    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] ((
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] .. Query with (ernesto)/(~info@P2PNET-41E95253.groni1.gr.home.nl) opened on (Tuesday, September 25th 2007, 18:00:54).
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] .. Total queries: (40)/(~0.7 per day)
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] .. Queries today: (1)
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] .. Common channels: (+#demonoid)
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] ((
    [05:26] *seanap*
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] (ernesto) hi
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.01] (ernesto) it's ernesto from TF
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.05] (seanap) hello
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.27] (ernesto) brb 1 min
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.28] (seanap) are you part of the staff there?
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.01] (ernesto) I'm the staff
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.03] (ernesto) hehe
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.32] (seanap) that article is completely false.
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.39] (ernesto) well, I based my story on a respectable source
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.47] (ernesto) but I doubted it
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.55] (ernesto) so what's going on then?
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:03.05] (seanap) there hasn't been word yet
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:03.44] (seanap) the 2 IRC ops that are usually in contact with Deimos haven't been around
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:03.45] (ernesto) last time demonoid staff said it were hw problems you relocated to CAN
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:04.11] (ernesto) they said my story was false then too
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:04.20] (ernesto) but it turned out not to be
    [05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:04.46] (seanap) well i'm saying we as site and IRC staff haven't heard anything.. and we'd be the first people to hear
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.18] (ernesto) perhaps Deimos doesn't know it?
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.21] (ernesto) yet
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.28] (seanap) so i don't think you should be reporting unconfirmed things, the IRC is going insane.. almost double the amount of users in a day
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.32] (ernesto) that was exactly how it happened last time
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.04] (ernesto) nu.nl is the biggest news source in NL
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.12] (ernesto) they might have inside info
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.21] (seanap) form who?! we are the inside
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.22] (ernesto) from the isp or the CRIA
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.41] (ernesto) the ISP probably firewalled the servers
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.52] (ernesto) after some seriuos legal threats
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.04] (ernesto) it's not unlikely
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.16] (seanap) no its not, but it's not.. confirmed
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.31] (ernesto) as long as you can't explain what's happening this is all I have
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.16] (seanap) no its not, but it's not.. confirmed
    [05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.31] (ernesto) as long as you can't explain what's happening this i

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    1. Re:Demonoid shit: by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      I can speak some dutch, and that link adds nothing new that isn't in the summary. Well, except for a link explaining how Demoniod was taken down previously by Brein (the dutch consumerscrewing association).

    2. Re:Demonoid shit: by mephistophyles · · Score: 1

      I CAN speak Dutch and the article says this:
      "Demonoid is offline again. After subpoenas by the CRIA." Those are the claims made by the author of the article. The so-called journalist that wrote the article is Wieland van Dijk, his blog is found at http://log.alamagordo.org/ for those interested.
      However, from a site I found by googling his name, http://www.amsterdamcentraal.nl/correspondenten/wieland/, is shows a few things, and this is my personal interpretation of this.
      1, he writes articles that are both poorly written and not exactly high-level journalism (reports on how Amsterdam's metro is doing for example)
      2, He claims to enjoy living in neighborhoods that are known as 'probleem wijken' which means problem neighborhoods, make your own opinions on that, but bundled with,
      3, he writes very one-sided articles, mainly about Amsterdam's soccer team, and has yet to (while browsing some of the articles) name a source.
      From this I personally conclude that he isn't exactly a 'professional journalist' of the caliber most people would rely on for news.

      oh and btw, I found his email for anyone wanting to ask him about his source of information, maybe he's got Deimos' phone number; wieland[at]amsterdamcentraal.nl

  56. Re:I hate Torrents by apt142 · · Score: 1

    The equations messed up, sorry. Here they are:

    Postage + Disk_Cost < ISP_Monthly_Fee/Seconds(current_month) * download_time_in_seconds

    and

    average_postal_transit_time < download_time_in_days

  57. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last night I tried to track down some software I wanted to try out and I wanted to see if Demonoid had it. To my surprise the site wouldn come up. I thought it might have been a DNS issue or some site maintenance. Anyways it got me thinking that perhaps I should sign up with them during their start of the month registration process. Looks like that won't be happening. This site has to be a goldmine for the "authorities". Demonoids databases track information their subscribers download history such as whose a more of a leecher than others and RATES THEM on it! I guess it's their way enforcing good behavior. Hopefully this "feature" won't hurt those that did sign up and are now having their data combed through by the resident evil investigator whose only doing her/his job.

    Oh Lord! I hope Isohunt doesn't get bitch slapped again with this shit! I love that site despite it being heavily policed by MediaJackoff!

  58. It's called CYA. Face-saving. They WERE shut down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had some sort of alternative explanation, they would post it.

    CRIA pwned Demonoid.

  59. Re:I hate Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL! How about you stop bootlegging shit while acting like it's a human right to do so?

  60. Wow. Slashdot fails again... by Real1tyCzech · · Score: 1

    The site is down for maintenance. Perhaps someone should hit Demonoids IRC before posting fantastical stories of it's demise..

    But where would all the hits go then....?

    Anything for a headline...even if it's BS.

  61. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by Chubby_C · · Score: 1

    you live in Toronto? sorry thats not central Canada thats considered the centre of Canada

    --
    - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  62. Re:CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I'd clean forgot til I read your post, but on Monday (I think it was Monday) all I got was a gigantic Demonoid logo and a "try back later" message. Which could have meant anything, from "server busy" to "oh fuck who's at the door??"

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  63. Re:CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? by morcego · · Score: 1

    It more likely is a hardware failure than anything. When I first tried Demonoid on Monday, the site was returning no data (it was responding to HTTP, however).


    I had problems like that, both monday and yesterday, on other sites as well. EZTV-EFnet site is one of those.

    Lets remember several TV series are starting a new season this week. It is also likely these servers just got overloaded and crash&burned.
    --
    morcego
  64. Re:I hate Torrents by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My ISP (a one-man band, so the owner is also the entire tech dept.) explained it to me thus:

    Download bandwidth is essentially free to the ISP.

    However, upload bandwidth costs the ISP serious money, they pay so much per gig, and therefore it is a major operating expense. And that's why they limit uploads, and why your upload cap is usually so much smaller than your download cap.

    So it's not the downloaders that are the problem, it's the uploaders. If you're going way over 1:1, sad to say your generosity is contributing to the problem.

    Until a byte can be compressed to a bit, I don't see any good solution for P2P.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  65. SMTP is up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying 209.44.123.21...
    Connected to demonoid.com.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    220 demonoid.com ESMTP Postfix
    ^]

    Nice attempt at accuracy.

  66. Different? Doesn't seem like it. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Torrenting a recording is a completely different animal than burning a copy of a friend's cd. Um, you want to explain that a little bit? Because I don't see any particular reason why it is.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Different? Doesn't seem like it. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Straight copying is a closed revenue environment. When you are burning a copy of a friend's cd, only two people have access to it, both of whom have paid for it (one through the original purchase, and one through the media levy). When you are torrenting a file, everyone on the planet has access to it, but only one person has paid for it. It is a leaky revenue environment.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Different? Doesn't seem like it. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the friend actually paid for the CD. If the friend is willing to let you copy CDs in the first place, why assume that the friend actually bought the CD? It's probably a lot more likely that what you're copying is their copy, that they made from somebody else's copy ... etc. Back before the internet became popular, and CD copying was more common than it was today, it wasn't rare to get many generations of copying from a single original, particularly in a high-density environment like a school or college. (Not that there's really any way to tell how many generations down from the original you are; that's the beauty of it being digital.)

      There's no inherent difference between digital copying that involves physical media, and copying onto more easily-erasable storage. You can copy a ton of music in MP3 format if you burn it to a DVD and sneakernet it, too; if you put 4.3GB of music on a DVD and pass it around a dorm, with each person copying it to their hard drive, you can probably share more music faster than if you used bittorrent (particularly if people near the top of the chain make additional DVD copies after they have their own hard-drive copy).

      The 'revenue environment' leaks like a sieve either way.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Different? Doesn't seem like it. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It's probably a lot more likely that what you're copying is their copy, that they made from somebody else's copy ... etc.

      Since each copy is made onto a levied media, it doesn't make any difference if you're copying from a source CD or a copy.

      I should probably note that I don't agree with the CRIA's line of reasoning. From my point of view, CDs are too bulky physically, and too small logically. A 4G flash drive holds a great deal more in a pocket sized format. Besides, I'm much more into "time shifting" video content from the torrent sites.

      We now return you to our irregularly scheduled episode of Babylon 5.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  67. Why is Slashdot posting rumors? by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

    Really, this is a non-news item. Why waste our time with rumors?

    If you read what the people behind Demonoid say, they're not sure what is happening right now.

    Just because one site on the Internet decides to post non-sense, Slashdot shouldn't chase after it.

  68. The pirate bay by darrenkopp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hope the pirate bay reams the RIAA and MPAA if they end up suing them. I wish someone would run for president on an anti-RIAA/anti-MPAA platform because they would have my vote.

  69. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'est dans la belle province, mon ami. Tabernac

  70. Re:Finger in the dike... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Informative

    A dyke is a lesbian. A dike is a dam.

    actually that is not true, look it up in a dictionary and you'll see that dike and dyke are synonims.

    dyke
              n 1: offensive terms for a lesbian who is noticeably masculine
                        [syn: butch, dike]
              2: a barrier constructed to contain the flow or water or to
                    keep out the sea [syn: dam, dike, levee]
              v : enclose with a dike; "dike the land to protect it from
                      water" [syn: dike]

    Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

    and from another

    dike
    noun {C} ANOTHER SPELLING OF
        dyke

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  71. kaedajnor's thoughts by kaedajnor · · Score: 1

    From what I've seen, the whole concept of Demonoid being shut down is false. Maybe they're just doing it for publicity. After all, I haven't heard much in the news from Demonoid lately. Everythings been "TPB this! TPB that!". So maybe DN just wants their share of the limelight? -kaedajnor http://www.undergroundunrest.com/blog

  72. Re:I hate Torrents by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But: I just want to say that I really hate torrents and torrent users. It is because of you that there are GB caps and severe upload restrictions on my internet access. Yes. Evil users. Look, they actually use the bandwidth they pay for!

    it is highly unlikely that the ISPs will ever become more generous in what they give the consumer. You need a slap with the cluebat. It isn't a matter of generosity. It's a matter of contract law. You pay for a service. ISP has to deliver service. If I buy a book at Amazon, it's not generosity that makes them deliver it to my house, it's the fact that they have to, because that's the service they offer and collect money for.
    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  73. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by ahoehn · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you could say Hi to my cousin on the way that would be awesome. He also lives in Canada.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  74. Possible cause. by Jeff+Carr · · Score: 1
    Another site went down at almost the exact same time as Demonoid, and just came back up today. To quote the admin.

    DDoS:ed by multiple computers loading pages as fast as the can to try to hose the connection and servers. Hopefully I can block them as soon as they pop up. It's possible that Demonoid is down for the same reason and the other site was attacked first as a test or secondary target.

    But once again, this is all just speculation.
    --
    The television will not be revolutionized.
  75. Re:Finger in the dike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    actually that is not true, look it up in a dictionary and you'll see that dike and dyke are synonims. Though synonims and synonyms aren't synonyms.
  76. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by despisethesun · · Score: 1

    The geographic centre of Canada is in Manitoba. Toronto is just the centre of the universe.

    --
    This poo is cold.
  77. Re:I hate Torrents by Gadgit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typically in a cable modem environment, the upstream ports on a CMTS are bundled together to a single downstream. In this sense, please remember that upstream is what going from the internet to the CMTS, to the cable modem (essentially the download path) and the downstream is your upload going in the opposite direction. In a typical Cisco 7200 CMTS each blade has 5 upstream ports and 1 downstream ports. If I remember correctly, each blade is recommended to serve approximately 1000 modems. Since cable is spaced out over various frequencies on the cable plant, a larger allotment of the frequencies not being used by cable TV are given to the upstream as that is 'typically' what is in higher demand. I know I would be pissed if I was getting 128Kb down and 3Mb up. With newer technologies (ie fiber) this problem should be alleviated.

  78. Re:I hate Torrents by Ignignoc · · Score: 0

    my 10mb connection transfers large amounts of data just fine. the only thing more efficient than bit torrent is a unthrottled server on a DS / OC line.

  79. Only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before The Pirate Bay rescues them, puts their trackers where TPB's are, and Demonoid then becomes untouchable.

    Just have to wait a lil bit folks.

  80. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by IronChef · · Score: 1

    This guy is NOT Canadian, he'd be riding a moose.

  81. Re:Finger in the dike... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't read the rest? It goes on in the same vein, about millions of lesbian Pandora cats with their boxes wide open. I guess GP had the wrong tab open when she typed that.

  82. TorrentFreak by seymourhill · · Score: 1

    Torrent Freak strikes again. I find it hard to believe that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would rely on one of Demonoid's rivals for the "truth" in this matter. Do we not remember the last time Demonoid went down and TorrentFreak had the "truth" about that as well, which later turned out to be bogus information...........

  83. I hate to break it to you... by aws910 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but "sensationalism sells". That's why most of the "news" on tv is about war/shootings/etc.

  84. No kidding. Another example: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you hear that the Linux kernel is going to be forked?!1! I read it on slashdot.

  85. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by megalumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it was in Australia us New Zealanders would simply walk over the harbour bridge and say "Oh hi, I upgraded your RAM" or something equally pithy.

  86. Apple's reason for the iBrick announcement was FUD by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

    The reason Apple made the announcement about bricking iPhones had nothing to do with with people who'd already unlocked their phone & everything to do with scaring away those who were thinking of unlocking their phone.

    Classic FUD.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  87. Re:I hate Torrents by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Good explanation. My brain hurts. :)

    So in addition to the cost differential, they're trying to balance it according to probable demand -- which of course makes good sense. You're right, most people would be seriously pissed if the norm was fast uploads but slow downloads!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  88. Re:CRIA Shut Down by Pirates by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

    So what's our excuse? Oh yeah, we don't make excuses we flaunt our faults here.

    ...and on that note, you have a booger hanging...

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  89. Article Rewrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Demonoid.com, one of the most popular BitTorrent trackers has allegedly been taken offline by Giant Flying Monkeys from Outer Space (GFMOS). Both the tracker and the website have been unresponsive for nearly 24 hours now.

    Update: The GFMOS and Demonoid's ISP refuse to comment to the allegations, they don't confirm or deny anything. In fact the Giant Flying Monkeys from Outer Space refused to answer any and all attempts at communication, obviously gleefull over their disruption of bittorrents on earth...

  90. Perhaps Demonoid... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the Demonoid admins should have slept with the CRIAA or the ISP, that seems to be how thngs are done in Canada, eh?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  91. Re:I hate Torrents by v1 · · Score: 1

    Speculating... they want to charge for the bits going in one direction or the other. Before p2p, the ones with deep pockets were the providers, the ones serving data. So even though when a bit goes on the internet it must both be sent and received, (so the net amount of upstream is close to the same as downstream) they choose to charge the ISPs pushing the data (that have the money) not the ones pulling it (that want free content)

    Although the circumstances may have changed, they really have no reason to change the business model now.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  92. Re:I hate Torrents by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    ISPs cause a lot of their own problems. Mostly because they don't develop resources for local users to create and share content amongst themselves. If they'd offer file sharing, forums, etc between their own users they could minimize such traffic. Some BT clients will attempt to optimize bandwidth by trying to opt for users that are on the same ISP or LAN. If ISPs would work with popular BT clients and trackers they could probably cut their bandwidth needs a lot. If they offered their own trackers, available only to their users, they could eliminate most casual BT users' bandwidth (most casual users I think stick to newly released content - speciality users go to places like Demonoid for harder to find stuff).

    If ISPs had more content providers rather than just content consumers they could probably get better terms on their bandwidth. Nobody really wants to support a bunch of leeches they aren't getting much money to deal with but everybody wants to offer access to good content. Of course, in the end, protocols like BitTorrent are here to stay and they're in demand for uses ranging from legal to illegal. If networks have to be redesigned to deal with it then it'll have to be done. BT is the way the Internet is supposed to work. It's supposed to be decentralized with everyone being both a consumer and provider.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  93. Time to hit back by scurvyj · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of this crrp. Can we hit back? Do demonoid have a fighting fund?

  94. Re:I hate Torrents by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

    and it is highly unlikely that the ISPs will ever become more generous in what they give the consumer.

    Are you suggesting that Internet access speeds will become slower over the next ten to twenty years? FIOS is being installed in my city as we speak. I'm pretty sure that my ISP is going to become more generous to me next year. A little more money, a lot more bandwidth.

  95. Re:Finger in the dike... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I'm more into lipstick lesbians. The butch thing doesn't really work for me.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  96. Re:I hate Torrents by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I think you're right -- they've got an established business model, with proven ability to suck a steady revenue stream out of ISPs -- why change that? And it won't change unless some new provider comes along who can make a different model work.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  97. Re:I hate Torrents by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Good points -- the only downside is that then the **AA could point and scream "FACILITATING PIRACY!" Since the BT stuff would be largely internal, and on the ISP's own trackers... they couldn't very duck that blame-stream.

    Of course, if the **AA cartel would get it through their heads that they're missing a huge revenue stream, where their potential customers pay the *entire* advertising and distribution budget -- hell, ideally they should provide inexpensive direct feeds to the ISPs, who could in turn offer that to their customers as internal BTs -- and offer discounted CDs/DVDs as a bonus (which of course would make more money, since if access FROM the BT'd content TO to an ordering system is properly handled, you'd get shitloads of impulse purchases).

    I'd guess that the savings to advertising and distribution budgets would more than make up for any actual losses to piracy (for purists, PLERGB defined as "copyright infringement"), and the **AA cartel would come out with a massive net gain on such a system -- as would the ISPs, from all that uploading they would no longer need to pay for.

    A minor downside that I can see developing from such a system would be "Warner Brothers content, *exclusive* to AOL members!" and suchlike. (Come to think of it, didn't AOL/TW try something like that once?) But I think the "we offer everything" systems would rapidly predominate, given a chance, much as the general Internet eventually clobbered the specialty services like Prodigy, despite their exclusive content.

    Would certainly be a great way to market ancient and back-catalog stuff that can no longer be found anywhere else.... at absolutely no cost to the content providers other than digitizing it. That would be free money falling from the sky, yet they prefer to maintain the illusion of total control instead. *sigh*

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  98. Employing the term "FUD" itself is FUD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its sole intent is to cast doubt (and uncertainty! They're different, you know!) on a claim the utilizer doesn't happen to like or agree with.

  99. Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd by Samah · · Score: 1

    Canada's so small that they only have one road...

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  100. I can do that too! by StingRay02 · · Score: 1

    Are you the one who formed the corporate policy regarding the release of the information about the bricked iPhones? No? Then your comment is uninformed, biased, and purely speculative. Classic FUD.

    1. Re:I can do that too! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      It's the simplest explanation that fits the facts. Occam's razor & all that.

      I'm Sorry you're too much of a fanboi to see what's in front of your own nose :-(

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:I can do that too! by StingRay02 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Right. The simplest "solution" is a corporate conspiracy designed to scare customers and drive away sales. Seems to me that "We just want to let you know there's a problem" is a lot simpler a solution.

      I'm sorry you're too much of an nutjob to recognize it.

  101. Re:Finger in the dike... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    And homonyms! ;)

    Yet mysteriously absent from http://www.cooper.com/alan/homonym_list.html and other homonym lists!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  102. move to sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why wouldn't they move to sweden and join piratebay in their fuck-the-cops utopia

  103. Re:I hate Torrents by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    If the **AA would just stop whining because the world's changed they could make a bundle off the changes. They could provide authorized content to ISPs for redistribution and ISPs could offer upsell opportunities for the content owners. When someone downloads your song don't try to stop them - instead offer the CD, posters, concert tickets, etc. Offer faster downloads for paying subscribers - not throttling normal connections but offering highspeed boosts exclusive to paying customers. There would be many chances to make money off downloaders. How much could they save in advertising? The system would work best without exclusive content deals - exclusive deals would immediately cause people to download from third party trackers again. So long as the authorized versions were of better quality and free there'd be no reason for third party competition.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  104. Clarification of "before the Internet"... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    When I said "Back before the internet became popular," I mean specifically broadband Internet access, and I mean 'popular for sharing media, particularly music.'

    Really what I'm talking about was that span of (depending where you lived, it was longer if you were out in the sticks than in an urban area) about 3-5 years or so where a lot of people had CD writers but only a select few people had broadband internet access and the knowledge of how to use it to get music.

    That period was (IMO) the peak of physical-media music swapping. Once Napster got popular, the number of people I knew who were swapping around burned CDs dropped dramatically. Although interestingly, I've seen it start to increase in popularity again recently; I think there's a perception particularly among non-technical people that P2P is dangerous and difficult to use, but passing a DVD of MP3s around the office isn't.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  105. The Fall of Demonoid by RemoRock · · Score: 1

    For many years, Demonoid has been the torrent leecher's first port of call. It's a shame to see it in a vicious legal battle, because it's one of many torrent portals who may soon meet their demise. The outcome of this venture shall be an interesting one. -Andrew

  106. Anecdotal news=/=Actual news by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    The day Demonoid went down, I was browsing the site for Beavis and Butthead collections. About three pages into the search, I was redirected to their default "We are currently performing maintenance, please try again in a few minutes" page. For the remainder of the day, up until the site went 404, I was still being redirected to the maintenance page.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  107. LOL, moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone clearly doesn't understand the meaning of Flamebait.

    Who could possibly be baited? It doesn't flame, it doesn't bait, and there is no possible return flame that it could be baiting for, since it doesn't say anything that someone might not like. /sigh

  108. Website still down, but tracker is back up by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Minutes ago I noticed that some demonoid torrents were again showing numbers for peers and leechers in my BT client and that starting those torrents was successful.

    I did not check the tracker IP to see if they may have relocated.

  109. That was really fucking boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ernesto please go play in traffic.

  110. demonoid blocked for Canadians... by sdclements · · Score: 1

    this is what I get when I visit http://www.demonoid.com/

    We received a letter from a lawyer represeting the CRIA, they were threatening with legal action and We need to start blocking Canadian traffic because of this. If you reside in Canada, that is the reason you are being redirected to this message. Thanks for your understanding, and sorry for any inconvenience.

  111. Demonoid is updating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always jumping to conclusions:

    The latest changes to the site are giving us some problems - We'll be back soon

  112. Demonoid Lawsuit by Darth_Evil · · Score: 1

    ya i made this account just to post that it states on the demonoid site that it was shut down because of a lawsuit:

    "We received a letter from a lawyer represeting the CRIA, they were threatening with legal action and We need to start blocking Canadian traffic because of this. If you reside in Canada, that is the reason you are being redirected to this message. Thanks for your understanding, and sorry for any inconvenience."

    and ya i'm a canadian resident