Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Moon Photo Doctored, Crater Moved

mytrip writes "A controversy over last week's photo of the lunar surface, allegedly from China's lunar spacecraft Chang'e, appears to be resolved. It's real but it isn't. An expert says the photo's resolution shows that it is of recent origin. However, for some inexplicable reason, someone on Earth edited the photo and moved a crater to a different location. 'In the week since the picture was released amid much fanfare in Beijing, there have been widespread rumors that the photo was a fake, copied from an old picture collected by a U.S. space probe. The photo from China's Chang'e 1 orbiter is clearly a higher-resolution view, with sunlight streaming from the northwest rather than the north. The mission's chief scientist, Ouyang Ziyuan, told the Beijing News that a new crater had been spotted on the Chang'e imagery — a crater that didn't appear on the US imagery. Lakdawalla determined that the crater in question wasn't exactly new — instead, it appeared to be a crater that had been moved from one spot on the picture to another spot slightly south.'"

201 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. That's not a moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a space station.

    1. Re:That's not a moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
  2. Coverup! by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    They moved it to cover up the obelisk!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Coverup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it was moved to cover up the "Made in Taiwan" sticker.

    2. Re: Coverup! by Jeremy_Bee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the same topic ... all these trips to the moon by other nations could settle the "UFO watched Apollo 11 Astronauts" theory once and for all.

      There is a particularly nutty conspiracy theory that says there was a landed UFO parked off to one side of the Apollo 11 landing site, and that the astronauts were being "watched" the whole time.

      Given that Luna has no air to speak of, the big round dent it presumably would have left in the moondust should still be visible if Japan/China/India wants to fly over that way and take some hi-res snaps. :-D

    3. Re:Coverup! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      They did it to cover up the lunar defacement that read:

      HACKED BY CHINESE!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Coverup! by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      The moon committee wanted at least an almond shaped crater, but nobody wasn't proficient with photoshop.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    5. Re:Coverup! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      They moved it to cover up the obelisk! Close. It was Moon Base Alpha.
      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    6. Re:Coverup! by dintech · · Score: 1

      Of course it's been doctored. The crater was orginally a spiral and some sharp german fellow at interpole has fixed it for us.

    7. Re:Coverup! by struberg · · Score: 1

      or: they moved it to cover up the US Flag on the moons surface?

    8. Re:Coverup! by afedaken · · Score: 1

      Spiral you say? Now where did I put the keys to my Ganmen...

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
  3. Well, now... by xENoLocO · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... who on earth would do such a thing?

    --
    "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    1. Re:Well, now... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Pride goeth before a fall. They should have checked more carefully before trumpeting their success. That egg on the face is mixed with Krazy Glue.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Well, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's say you were born in China. You're an only child. You have two parents and four grandparents doting on you. Sometimes they even call you a spoiled little emperor.

      They instill in you the legacy of Confucianism, especially the values of hierarchy and hard work. They send you off to school. You learn that it takes phenomenal feats of memorization to learn the Chinese characters. You become shaped by China's intense human capital policies.

      You quickly understand what a visitor understands after dozens of conversations: that today's China is a society obsessed with talent, and that the Chinese ruling elite recruits talent the way the N.B.A. does -- rigorously, ruthless, in a completely elitist manner.

      As you rise in school, you see that to get into an elite university, you need to ace the exams given at the end of your senior year. Chinese students have been taking exams like this for more than 1,000 years.

      The exams don't reward all mental skills. They reward the ability to work hard and memorize things. Your adolescence is oriented around those exams -- the cram seminars, the hours of preparation.

      Roughly nine million students take the tests each year. The top 1 percent will go to the elite universities. Some of the others will go to second-tier schools, at best. These unfortunates will find that, while their career prospects aren't permanently foreclosed, the odds of great success are diminished. Suicide rates at these schools are high, as students come to feel they have failed their parents.

      But you succeed. You ace the exams and get into Peking University. You treat your professors like gods and know that if you earn good grades you can join the Communist Party. Westerners think the Communist Party still has something to do with political ideology. You know there is no political philosophy in China except prosperity. The Communist Party is basically a gigantic Skull and Bones. It is one of the social networks its members use to build wealth together.

      You are truly a golden child, because you succeed in university as well. You have a number of opportunities. You could get a job at an American multinational, learn capitalist skills and then come back and become an entrepreneur. But you decide to enter government service, which is less risky and gives you chances to get rich (under the table) and serve the nation.

      In one sense, your choice doesn't matter. Whether you are in business or government, you will be members of the same corpocracy. In the West, there are tensions between government and business elites. In China, these elites are part of the same social web, cooperating for mutual enrichment.

      Your life is governed by the rules of the corpocracy. Teamwork is highly valued. There are no real ideological rivalries, but different social networks compete for power and wealth. And the system does reward talent. The wonderfully named Organization Department selects people who have proven their administrative competence. You work hard. You help administer provinces. You serve as an executive at state-owned enterprises in steel and communications. You rise quickly.

      When you talk to Americans, you find that they have all these weird notions about Chinese communism. You try to tell them that China isn't a communist country anymore. It's got a different system: meritocratic paternalism. You joke: Imagine the Ivy League taking over the shell of the Communist Party and deciding not to change the name. Imagine the Harvard Alumni Association with an army.

      This is a government of talents, you tell your American friends. It rules society the way a wise father rules the family. There is some consultation with citizens, but mostly members of the guardian class decide for themselves what will serve the greater good.

      The meritocratic corpocracy absorbs rival power bases. Once it seemed that economic growth would create an independent middle class, but now it is clear that the affluent parts of society have been assimilated into the state/enterprise

    3. Re:Well, now... by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, an intersting article by David Brooks. But what was your point?

    4. Re:Well, now... by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      We are China, Alcohol dehydrogenase^W^WWesternness is futile, you will be obsoleted.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    5. Re:Well, now... by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      Even so it's fairly shortsighted of China, assuming they created a fake so good it thwarted the best efforts on Earth to determine the picture offhand, there are one of 2 things that would have debunked this new crater.

      A) A high enough resolution telescope certainly wouldn't lie, corroborated from multiple international telescopes at high enough resolution and the chinese look stupid.

      B) Assuming the Chinese thwart the telescope option (nothing high enough resolution to look at the crater), someday we might just head back to the moon and check out this new crater..."uuuh Astronaut 2 to Astronaut one, the chinese said that new crater was a left at the old Rover monument, south for 1 mile...but I don't see it..."

      --
      ...in bed
    6. Re:Well, now... by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      wsan't that crater on the darkside ? and if so how would a telescope get to look at it without orbiting the moon ?

  4. spoiler alert by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Informative

    SPOILER: It was a poor stitch/blend job.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:spoiler alert by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe someone could explain to me the implication in the article that the data is scientifically useless. If it's just a bad stitch job done back here on Earth it would seem they would still have the original data and could reperform the stitch no? Even if they don't all the data between the stitches is still good which I would imagine is probably what the real researchers use anyway.

    2. Re:spoiler alert by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Informative

      The image as currently released by China is scientifically useless, since there are known errors within it. If a new image were to be released that was known to be done correctly, then it could potentially be scientifically useful.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:spoiler alert by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Why would real researchers need more images of the lunar surface? Visual images aren't what's really used for creating detailed maps, and images of that region of the moon have existed for years anyway.

    4. Re:spoiler alert by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do, and they've announced intent to release it. This was just an image for public consumption -- and really, the standard for releasing images for public consumption is to blend the seams. For scientific images, you leave the seams unblended.

      The only problem here was that one of their own scientists mistook a stitching error in their public product for an actual feature without consulting the raw data. That's all there is to this story. Everyone wants to turn it into another chance to bash China, though.

      --
      "I can't tell, do you feel bad or proud?" "No." "No to which one?" "Feel."
  5. Feng Shui by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    probably a feng shui thing.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Feng Shui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I dont know. I'm a Realtor in Monterrey Park (in LA County) in a predominately asian area. I hate to say this, but I really dislike working with Chinese clients because of their belief in Feng Shui. About 3 out of every 4 of my Chinese clients require a home that is in harmony with "Feng Shui", so that it will help them become richer.

      Even MGM Grand hotel in Las Vegas had to rebuild its entrance on the strip due to a Feng Shui belief of Chinese Gamblers that the mouth of a Lion is bad luck. Many Chinese entered MGM through its back entrance, while most avoided the MGM altogether.

    2. Re:Feng Shui by c_woolley · · Score: 1

      "I don't see how americans claim to be supporter of Taiwan yet continue to diss their culture time and again."

      Perhaps leaving Taiwan to be absorbed by the Chinese would clear this up for you...Also, since people from all over the world visit/comment on this site, why make the "retarded comment" about this being an American? I am not American...but I also don't care if China bans Feng Shui.

      On to the OP, I don't think China deliberately doctored the image. As many have already stated, it looks like they got caught up in the moment and made a mistake.

    3. Re:Feng Shui by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's the issue - your sense of humor is broken. Retardation is not funny - but my joke is.

      Let's hit wikipedia real quick: Today's Feng Shui schools teach that it is the ancient Chinese practice of placement and arrangement of space to achieve harmony with the environment. Fen Shui originated in China. The picture came from China. See the connection? That my statement is absurd is what makes it funny. That Feng Shui would be banned by the Chinese government makes the joke that much funnier. This does not 'diss' (why do you diss english with this lame slang?) Taiwanese culture in the least. Taiwan doesn't even enter the picture - unless you are running around with some kind of chip on your shoulder.

      Oh and as far as our supporting Taiwan - I personally took part in operations like this that have been a part of Taiwan remaining free from Chinese control. But I'm wandering now - the issue is your inability to get a joke. Pointing fingers at Christians and laughing at Allah could be funny too in the right context.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    4. Re:Feng Shui by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

      Best. Joke Defense. Ever.

      In other words... pwnt.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    5. Re:Feng Shui by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Free it to what? a religious dictatorship?
      Please think.

      Your joke was excellent by the way.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Feng Shui by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1

      China is the one today that hates fungshui.

      Yeah um, the Chinese government actually has a whole Feng Shui industry themselves. You must be thinking about Falun Gong which was banned by the Chinese government in 1999. How does Taiwan even come into this?

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    7. Re:Feng Shui by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1

      The dumbass was probably thinking of Falun Gong that was banned by the Chinese Government in 1999. China's Feng Shui advisory service industry is still thriving.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    8. Re:Feng Shui by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Lighten up. I don't see anything anti-Taiwanese in that post. Humorless pricks like you give the rest of us Taiwanese a bad name.

    9. Re:Feng Shui by arodland · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure whether the grandparent is a troll or a garden-variety idiot (the only difference being whether it's intentional) but the bit that maybe you missed about it is that it stems from "confusion" of feng shui and Falun Gong. Not that the latter is evil, either, but it certainly qualifies as persecuted.

    10. Re:Feng Shui by oasisweb · · Score: 1
      From wikipedia:

      Since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, feng shui has been officially deemed as a "feudalistic superstitious practice" and a "social evil" according to the state's atheistic Communist ideology and discouraged or even outright banned at times [39][40]. Persecution was the most severe during the Cultural Revolution, when feng shui was classified as a custom under the so-called Four Olds to be wiped out. Feng shui practitioners were beaten and abused by Red Guards and their works burned. After the death of Mao Zedong and the end of the Cultural Revolution, the official attitude became more tolerant but restrictions on feng shui practice are still in place in today's China. It is illegal in the PRC today to register feng shui consultation as a business and similarly advertising feng shui practice is banned, and there have been frequent crackdowns on feng shui practitioners on the grounds of "promoting feudalistic superstitions" such as one in Qingdao in early 2006 when the city's business and industrial administration office shut down an art gallery converted into a feng shui practice [41]. Communist officials who had consulted feng shui were sacked and expelled from the Communist Party [42].
      So it does indeed seem to be banned to some extent.

      In any case, I don't see anything in the comment that makes fun of the fengshui culture. It's the actions of the Chinese that is being mocked. If he is in fact Taiwanese, I'd be inclined to believe it's just a misunderstanding caused by the language barrier.
    11. Re:Feng Shui by zanaxagoras · · Score: 1

      Alright, children... now everybody settle down. Don't make me have to pull over this fake lunar module.

    12. Re:Feng Shui by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I hate to say I agree with the Chinese government, but the Falun Gong are a bunch of raving loonies and the only reason they are afforded the smallest inch of credibility in the west is because doing so helps to justify an increasing paranoia about the rise of mainland China here.

      Seriously, Li Hongzhi fits every definition of a cult leader. Check out this interview with him in Time magazine for a taste of his wackiness.

      Not that any of this justifies persecution, of course, but he's the Chinese L. Ron Hubbard.

  6. See? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should have used the original movie set in New Mexico.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:See? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, it's being used for the Mars Rover mission

  7. maybe just a watermark by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Haven't cartographers been known to put little errors like this in on purpose so they can tell if someone has copied their map? Still seems pretty silly to do it with such scientific data, but we know that China has no qualms manipulating any other kind of information.

    1. Re:maybe just a watermark by kilgor · · Score: 1

      or as someone commented on TFA: "It is really lead paint !"

    2. Re:maybe just a watermark by prelelat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If it isn't an obvious photoshop who's to say that the US didn't manipulate their original so that they would know if someone else was using their pictures instead of making their own. I could see the U.S. doing this to see if a government said they had technology that they did not.

    3. Re:maybe just a watermark by Yahma · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The Chinese government have been doctoring photos for political reasons at least since the 1940's.

    4. Re:maybe just a watermark by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Informative

      jiyuu-shikan.org is a well-known Japanese history revisionist website. No better than Holocaust deniers.

      The best evidence they could come up with for the baby picture was "the photographer laughed" and "the guy carrying some baby walked towards the rail tracks".

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    5. Re:maybe just a watermark by zenkonami · · Score: 1

      And would then have to manipulate every photo of any noteworthiness whatsoever.

      Occam, anyone?

      --

      Do You Experiment?
    6. Re:maybe just a watermark by mikael · · Score: 1

      They do that on ordnance survey maps - one of their favorite tricks is to flip round the orientation of a building (especially corporate office blocks). There's nothing worse than trying to take a taxi from a railway station, only to spend 15 minutes driving in circles because the map is wrong (and it's obviously wrong because the non-symmetrical shape of the building has been rotated/flipped from what it actually is).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:maybe just a watermark by DavidRawling · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt it - the moon rotates on its axis precisely once per revolution of the earth, so the part of the moon facing the earth always changes. As a result, we can take see just over 50% of the moon's surface [ref: http://www.nineplanets.org/luna.html] from Earth. Pictures of the far side must be taken by a lunar satellite.

    8. Re:maybe just a watermark by DavidRawling · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh for goodness sake. Previewed the darn thing twice and STILL missed it:

      The part of the moon facing the earth NEVER changes.

      Doofus!

      (I'd have posted this sooner if I didn't have to wait a few hours between comments ...)

  8. Someone didn't read the NIE by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know those crazy craters, getting legs and all. Happens all the time.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  9. Bad Astonomy by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bad Astonomy readers are already up to date. It's an error in composition of the picture. Nothing less, nothing more.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Bad Astonomy by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't appear to be a correct analysis. I can easily see the difference in the lighting and composition, but there still appears to be an extra/moved crater in the Chinese photo. It could well be that it's a real thing (a genuine new crater) but the original article could be correct as well.

            Brett

    2. Re:Bad Astonomy by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      It is +5.... So... Well... Ehm, don't mod this one down... My poor Karma! ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:Bad Astonomy by Kelson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except it doesn't appear to be a correct analysis. I can easily see the difference in the lighting and composition, but there still appears to be an extra/moved crater in the Chinese photo.

      Two issues:

      1. Is it copied?
      2. What's up with the new crater?

      The analysis concluded that it's not copied, and concluded that the moved crater can be explained by a mistake stitching the components together. If you look at that article, you'll note that the new image is missing a small crater in one place, and has an extra small crater a little ways away, and there's an odd indentation around it. She figured out where the seam probably was, shifted the parts a bit, and they line up perfectly.

  10. Trouble with the Chinese moon missions by wcrowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    The main difference between Chinese and American moon missions: 30 minutes after the Chinese have explored the moon, they feel like exploring it again.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Trouble with the Chinese moon missions by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Well, it adds a lot to the replayability value.

    2. Re:Trouble with the Chinese moon missions by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I thought that was the problem with 18-year-olds' moon missions.

      Great. Now I have to keep my wife from talking to her Chinese friends, or I'm going to have to deal with *yet another* comparative inadequacy.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  11. Sorry, we had to. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    We had an agreement that they would not build anything in that crater, and yet it was lighted up like a christmas tree. It should have been a clean pass for the cameras dammit.

  12. just habit by wardk · · Score: 1

    the chinese need to alter absolutely everything to conform to some ideological thingamjig, what this would be conforming to isn't real clear

    so it's probably just a case of them doing it 'out of habit'

    or maybe they were hiding Iran's nukes from our glorious leader's intelligence services

  13. Chinese knockoffs by Zouden · · Score: 4, Funny

    The US version looks way more realistic.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:Chinese knockoffs by MegaMahr · · Score: 1

      Also, the chinese version plays mp3s, can be used to incapacitate small children, and is a hell of a lot cheaper...

      --
      788652 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 19 x 1153
    2. Re:Chinese knockoffs by sincewhen · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the Chinese one was only a quarter of the price!

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  14. TFA by sporkme · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lakdawalla found that a mistake was apparently made in stitching together the 19 strips of imagery to produce the finished picture - and that Chinese officials unknowingly pointed out that mistake as they defended the photo's veracity.
    Not a fake, not an intentional edit, and a moronic blunder in trying to prove authenticity.
  15. Bad summary by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Doctored" suggests deliberate fiddling with the data to mislead.

    It seems here that this is actually just a result of a vanilla screw-up.

    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Though instead of "stupidity" I'd substitute "error".

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Bad summary by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      Though instead of "stupidity" I'd substitute "error".

      How about a mistake made while caught up in the exuberance of the moment?

    2. Re:Bad summary by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'll have to talk to your parents about that one.

    3. Re:Bad summary by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny
      Like forgetting to put on a condom?

      Sure, even the most diligent scientists can forget correct procedure when caught up in euphoria or other pressures.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    4. Re:Bad summary by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for spotting this out. I'm not sure wtf is wrong with /. editors and a lot of the submitters that post apparent flame-bait and anti-Chinese propaganda when they seize the chance.

    5. Re:Bad summary by Kelson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly how can you accidentally open up Photoshop and move a crater from one place to another?

      By taking 2 -- or in this case 19 -- photos that cover different parts of an area, stitching them together to make one big photo, and making a mistake with the positioning on one of the pieces.

      You did read the actual article before rebutting to a comment that told you the summary was inaccurate, right?

    6. Re:Bad summary by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure wtf is wrong with /. editors
      Read the FAQ - the editors specifically deny any attempts at fact checking. Slashdot exists to post interesting stuff fast, not accurately.
    7. Re:Bad summary by NickNameCreateAccoun · · Score: 1

      Its called selling a story. You do it so you could get the readers interested. And then later profit.

    8. Re:Bad summary by OriginalArlen · · Score: 4, Informative
      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    9. Re:Bad summary by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You did read the actual article before rebutting to a comment that told you the summary was inaccurate, right?"

      Of course not. Besides this being Slashdot and RTFAing being discouraged, it would ruin my opportunity to be wildly inaccurate.

      I read it later.

    10. Re:Bad summary by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Read the FAQ - the editors specifically deny any attempts at fact checking.

      So a small print disclaimer makes it all right to be incompetent and careless?

      Well, the real question then is why they call themselves "editors".

      If they just called themselves "webmasters", moderators", etc, they would not raise any expectations. Even so, if one does press the publish button, and your name appears below it, one does endorse it in some way. And one thing the Slashdot "editors" quite often do is rewrite the headline, often making it more sensational and misleading.

    11. Re:Bad summary by bheekling · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed, it's frustrating how /. authors seem to like generating spin and controversy. Pure hits and revenue game.
      If I didn't know /. was really just a blog, I would have said it's bad journalism at its best.

      --
      "..."
    12. Re:Bad summary by mpe · · Score: 1

      "Doctored" suggests deliberate fiddling with the data to mislead.
      It seems here that this is actually just a result of a vanilla screw-up.


      e.g. the released picture is the result of several images being manually "stiched together".

    13. Re:Bad summary by Klatma · · Score: 1

      I read the article and it stated that the crater in question was of a lower resolution with different lighting angles, taken from a 1994 image. So that does hint at some sort of deliberate manipulation. But with that said it is still entirely possible that it was an accident, or one of the images was bad and they used a bit from an older image to try to recover. How really knows besides the people that did it? I do know that I do not trust the Chinese government though.

    14. Re:Bad summary by xeromist · · Score: 1

      Yes, too bad this wasn't the story directly linked from the summary. Of course, if this were the story maybe it wouldn't have even been posted at all.

      --
      This sig is exactly seventy characters long and a real waste of space!
    15. Re:Bad summary by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I read the article and it stated that the crater in question was of a lower resolution with different lighting angles, taken from a 1994 image. So that does hint at some sort of deliberate manipulation.

      No, that's not what the article said. People were claiming that the whole photo was copied from the 1994 image, and the analyst determined that couldn't be the case because of the lighting angles and resolution.

      The "new" crater appears to have been moved from another portion of the current image, close enough that a stitching error could explain it. Lakdawalla's own post. linked from the article, describes her analysis in more detail. The image is stitched together from smaller photos, and there are other features near the crater which don't match the older US photo. She worked out where the seam probably was, slid the image along it, and everything lined up.

  16. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Oblig. by evil+agent · · Score: 1

      Pfft, the image in that link was definitely photoshopped.

      --
      End transmission.
  17. Actually... by wolfman_jake · · Score: 1, Funny

    Chuck Norris round-house kicked someones ass into the moon after the previous pictures were taken and created a new crater.

  18. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Couldn't the additional small crater seen in the Chinese photo be from an asteroid collision that occurred after the Clementine picture was taken?

    Yep, that is exactly what happened. The asteroid hit a rectangle of terrain from another spot in the old photograph and blasted it up in the air.... well of course the moon has no air but you know what I mean... and this rectangle of terrain landed intact at the new location. Quite simple and obvious really.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  19. Misleading summary - it's not intentional by iamacat · · Score: 5, Informative

    As per the TFA, a mistake was made stitching together 19 separate photographs to produce image of a large area of the moon that the probe could not have captured in one shot. Since each picture is taken at slightly different angle and distance from the surface, some retouching is unavoidable. Otherwise some craters will look like a weird set of arcs with different radius rather than circles. Such stretching got to slightly move some depicted object from their exact position. In fact, it is not possible to produce a flat picture of a 3D object without distortions. Just compare the size and shape of Alaska on your globe as compared to your map.

    I would assume that you can request the original mission data for serious research use instead of having to rely on newspaper clippings for science. If those images are also doctored, then we have a genuine controversy.

    1. Re:Misleading summary - it's not intentional by ultranova · · Score: 1

      In fact, it is not possible to produce a flat picture of a 3D object without distortions.

      Of course it is. The surface of a cube, for example, can be projected to a plane without distortion.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Misleading summary - it's not intentional by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Well, adjacent features will certainly appear very far from each other in your projection.

  20. Doctored my ass by cats2ndlife · · Score: 5, Informative

    The original article says and suggests nothing about the photo being "doctored", it's simply a mistake that scientists make all the time. When can we expect a better moderated Slashdot or people who can read?

    1. Re:Doctored my ass by mihalis · · Score: 4, Funny

      When can we expect a better moderated Slashdot or people who can read?

      That's going to be an in-game feature of Duke Nukem Forever.

    2. Re:Doctored my ass by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "The original article says and suggests nothing about the photo being "doctored", it's simply a mistake that scientists make all the time."

      You mean the mistake of incorrectly stitching the photos, or the mistake about yelling "Hey, we found a new crater the American photos don't show" instead of "WTF - this can't be right".

      Yes both are mistakes, but one is a lot more meaningful than the other.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  21. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by Kelson · · Score: 1

    That was the initial explanation for the "new" feature, though as Bad Astronomy pointed out, since it's on the near side of the moon, the impact probably would have been observed. However, the actual article (unlike the misleading summary) states that it can be explained by a botched job stitching together the components of the mosaic.

  22. For crying out loud, include the rationale! by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Informative

    The summary almost criminally neglects to include the reported reason for doing this, which is entirely legitimate:

    Often, surface features that show up on two strips of data have to be manually corrected to produce the finished image, due to subtle changes in perspective.

    "You know that there should have been seams in that image, and I just did not look for them carefully at the time," Lakdawalla told me today.


    If you've ever viewed satellite imagery, you'll recognize that the source images are not nice, ultrahigh resolution wide arc views, but instead low resolution wide arc views or high resolution narrow arc views. The 'recognizable' product that is released to a nontechnical public, such as the images used in Google Earth, are the result of post-processing including image registration, tone correction, etc. See this article on mosaicing multi-sensor images, for example.

    Surprise. Some technician made a mistake. No cookie.

  23. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

    Couldn't the additional small crater seen in the Chinese photo be from an asteroid collision that occurred after the Clementine picture was taken?
    If I had read all of the relevant links then I would have read that the astronomer found no new or missing craters.
  24. People, RTFA, read the spoiler posts...PLEASE. by Radon360 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize that it goes against the general Slashdot commenting procedure, but read just a little before commenting on this one, please.

    1. Two photos were poorly stitched together, repeating an image of a crater on the combined photo (the crater was photographed twice).
    2. Chinese scientists miss the poor stitch job and proclaim they found a new crater.
    3. Someone else takes a close look at this "discovery" and points out the error in the stitch job.

    The crater wasn't intentionally added, it's a result of trying to align two photos, each taken from a different perspective in which the edges won't completely line up exactly.

    1. Re:People, RTFA, read the spoiler posts...PLEASE. by gnuman99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They not only stitched it wrong, they also retouched the merge lines making the resulting image *useless* scientifically. It is just a nice picture now that one may as well have drawn. You can't do any measurements with it as all relative information is basically lost through their effort to make it prettier.

    2. Re:People, RTFA, read the spoiler posts...PLEASE. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, this happens to international space photography every now and then too -- from the US, Europe, Russia... Often it's actually far more noticeable than in this case, and I seriously think that the controversy of this case actually comes from that the stitching is so *little* noticeable. That can make people come up with conspiracy theories. They probably wouldn't if the stitching was far more obvious, like from someone combining two images with even more differing perspectives (see the northern parts of that photo). That, and of course being a Chinese experiment (damn Commies, etc, etc) plays against them per definition.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:People, RTFA, read the spoiler posts...PLEASE. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "2. Chinese scientists miss the poor stitch job and proclaim they found a new crater."

      Which makes them look like idiots. Their first reaction should have been "Huh? That can't be right" and rechecking the data. And if they did so and still didn't catch the mistake, they are even bigger idiots.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:People, RTFA, read the spoiler posts...PLEASE. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Well, they presumably still have the originals, and all the other telemetry data. Which would always be more valuable and useful than any 'stitched together' image in the first place. Why not acknowledge that the whole data package is more important than a 'presentation' piece they assemble to show to the non-scientists??

  25. Re:It's a shop by zsouthboy · · Score: 5, Funny
  26. huh? by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..and what happens if they actually do find anything new? hello! Boy who cried wolf syndrome....

    pffffft. that was the sound of their credability dying a death.

    its sad really, somewhere in China there are some *very* capable engineers holding their heads in their hands.

  27. Supports not nullifies by benhocking · · Score: 3, Informative

    That supports the article; it doesn't nullify it. In fact, Bad Astronomy gave them credit for figuring it out. (The summary could have explained this a little better, but what's new?)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  28. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

    However, the actual article (unlike the misleading summary) states that it can be explained by a botched job stitching together the components of the mosaic.
    You are right; I failed to read everything before posting. I was just looking at the pretty pictures.
  29. Re:ON the topic of it being a fake by aicrules · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use of the chinese version of photoshop would be easy to test for, it has the lead-based paint bucket in place of the regular one...

  30. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by andy314159pi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and this rectangle of terrain landed intact at the new location. Quite simple and obvious really.
    Okay, okay you've proven that I'm a stupid dildo.
  31. I would have believed it... by Skiron · · Score: 1

    ...but the URL is a MS blog, and I banned myself from these years ago.

  32. Re:ON the topic of it being a fake by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    Shall we start with the 3D renditions of Humans not looking realistic when you give it more than a glance? Followed by the picture looking like previous shots of the moon.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  33. Rubber stamp tool in photoshop by wigle · · Score: 1

    Open the image and Photoshop. Use the rubber stamp tool to remove some 'imaginary' seams. It is pretty easy to replicate the mistake and easy to understand how it could be made. The Chinese scientists should have verified their findings with the original un-stitched images before taking it to the press.

    --
    ::wigle::
  34. New Crater? by Arkitus · · Score: 1

    Could it be that the crater has been formed recently? Do things still hit the moon? Or has it been left untouched for a long time?

    1. Re:New Crater? by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Could it be that the crater has been formed recently?

      Yes -- if another explanation hadn't surfaced already, it could have been new, but with very low probability.

      Do things still hit the moon?

      Yes, but their mean size has been decreasing for eons as the Earth/Moon system sweeps out the rocks in its path. Little bitty ones still hit it all the time just as they hit Earth, but the bigger a crater is, the lower the probability that it's recent.

      rj

  35. Houston, we have goldfarmers. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Fortunately it's too far for them to camp, and they havent figured out that there is no loot on the moon(save for the US mission).

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  36. You must be from Wall Street? by cwcpetech · · Score: 1

    Just add a tariff to make up for the intentional depreciation.

  37. I for one salute our Lunar Overlords (oblig) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I for one salute our Lunar Overlords and their quick-thinking relocation of their Lunar Attack Base when they saw the Chinese coming!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  38. Ob. by NewbieV · · Score: 1

    That's no Moon!

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
  39. Uh oh... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1
  40. Its obvious... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    the Chinese photoshopped-out the secret alien moonbase where all the UFO's come from.
    Everyone knows NASA have been sucessfully editing out alien content from all their space imagery since the 60's.
    Th CIA were afriad that the Chinese would finally blow the game by releasing unedited images of aliens on the moon to the public.
    It was only when Bush threatened trade sanctions on the import of fortune cookies that the Chinese agreed to also edit all imagery.

  41. what i don't understand by phishfood · · Score: 1

    with all the high powered telescopes, land and spaced based, why cant we point them at the moon and find the rover, flag, space boot prints, etc that was left over from the landing? its not like the moon has shifting sands or such (or does it? ;)

    1. Re:what i don't understand by nagora · · Score: 1
      with all the high powered telescopes, land and spaced based, why cant we point them at the moon and find the rover, flag, space boot prints, etc that was left over from the landing?

      Well, they're not quite that clear but the photos have been taken of the sites complete with tracks of the buggies. Have you tried Google?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:what i don't understand by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's do to optics and resolution.
      And the fact there is no real need to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:what i don't understand by JetScootr · · Score: 1

      Briefly put: Any telescope powerful to resolve images of the landers (and there are at at leasta few) would be overwhelmed by the brightness, thus damaging the device. This can of course be designed for, but then you'd be designing a telescope that had only one real purpose - to debunk the theories of wackos who probably wouldn't accept the proof anyway.
      Oh and you'd probly havta put it in orbit to avoid overwhelmingly uncorrectable atmospheric blurring, putting it back in NASA's lap to prove the wackos wrong, and the wackos are already not listening to NASA.

      --
      Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  42. obviously.. by NNOP · · Score: 1

    ..the moon must be populated by little green men waving 'Free Tibet' placards..

  43. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by forkazoo · · Score: 1

    You are right; I failed to read everything before posting. I was just looking at the pretty pictures.


    How do you say "Relaxen und watchen das Blinkenkraters" in fake chinese?
  44. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by wattrlz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seppuku a.k.a. "Hari Kari" is a japanese tradition.

  45. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe, but the sword will be billed on his family.

  46. China scares me by caywen · · Score: 1

    As over the top as it sounds, I wonder if China will end up jailing (or even executing ) the worker that "doctored" (more likely misstitched) the strips. If this causes China enough national embarassment, that is.

  47. Crater Recall by Nonsanity · · Score: 1

    The rogue crater has been recalled, and it didn't even contain lead!

  48. Quick! by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone call Richard C. Hoagland!

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  49. China is fascist, not communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Which is why China is a mature fascist country as opposed to a communist country.

    see http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=105001682

    Snippet:
    China is not, as is invariably said, in transition from communism to a freer and more democratic state. It is, instead, something we have never seen before: a maturing fascist regime. This new phenomenon is hard to recognize, both because Chinese leaders continue to call themselves communists, and also because the fascist states of the first half of the 20th century were young, governed by charismatic and revolutionary leaders, and destroyed in World War II. China is anything but young, and it is governed by a third or fourth generation of leaders who are anything but charismatic.

    The current and past generations of Chinese leaders, from Deng Xiaoping to Jiang Zemin, may have scrapped the communist economic system, but they have not embraced capitalism. To be sure, the state no longer owns "the means of production." There is now private property, and, early last June, businessmen were formally admitted to the Communist Party. Profit is no longer taboo; it is actively encouraged at all levels of Chinese society, in public and private sectors. And the state is fully engaged in business enterprise, from the vast corporations owned wholly or in part by the armed forces, to others with top management and large shareholders simultaneously holding government jobs.

    This is neither socialism nor capitalism; it is the infamous "third way" of the corporate state, first institutionalized in the 1920s by the founder of fascism, Benito Mussolini, then copied by other fascists in Europe.

    1. Re:China is fascist, not communist by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      It is, instead, something we have never seen before: a maturing fascist regime. This new phenomenon is hard to recognize, both because Chinese leaders continue to call themselves communists, and also because the fascist states of the first half of the 20th century were young, governed by charismatic and revolutionary leaders, and destroyed in World War II.

      Try Spain. Franco stayed well out of World War II, behaved politely towards the Americans afterwards, and remained in power in Spain until his death in 1975.

      Now Spain was sitting on a continent dominated by a growing confederacy of democratic nations and backed by a democratic superpower - so it made sense after Franco's death for Spain to become a democracy also. But had circumstances been different, a Fascist successor might well have emerged.

      China does seem to have got around the main problem such states tend to encounter, though: they've managed to ensure smooth successions. And they've done away with any kind of cult of personality around a Leader figure; how many people can even name the current Chinese leadership? Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao have been relatively obscure figures at the heart of a vast government apparatus. No great rallies in their name, no vast portraits or monolithic statuary.

      I think it's not Fascism we want to compare to here, since Fascism tends to emphasise a single strong Leader behind whom the country is expected to rally. Instead I think we're looking at old-fashioned Chinese Bureaucracy. Sure there's an emperor in there somewhere, but he's surrounded by armies of officials and mandarins and secretaries. The man in charge may change but the system goes on. Here comes the new boss, same as the old boss...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  50. Who's gonna pay for this? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    I bet that some Tibetian monk is going to get beaten for this little screwup.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  51. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by lordmetroid · · Score: 1

    While harakiri is a Japanese tradition in modern china the government just shoots you for the disgrace you cause the country.

  52. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by sound+vision · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's actually "Hara-Kiri".

  53. Parent post is from the NYT by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    Let's say you take a editorial by David Brooks and paste it in without attribution.

    1. Re:Parent post is from the NYT by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      well, at least he didn't claim it as his own, unless you count 'anonymous' as a name now. (I realize there is someone out there with the 'anonymous' nick).

  54. All scientific photos are doctored by kindbud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's called post-processing. You should go to the STSCI site and download some raw Hubble frames if you want to see some sources images that were "doctored" in the extreme to create those iconic images that adorn your calendars and desktops. The unprocessed frames are barely recognizable and contain huge amounts of visible noise from cosmic ray hits and all sorts of instrument artifacts.

    The Chinese screwed up mosaicking their imagery. Big deal. Now that they know how far up their ass the scientific community will be looking, I am sure they will strive for more rigor. Their desire to be a contributing member of the scientific community appears genuine to me.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:All scientific photos are doctored by devolutionist · · Score: 1

      Once again, shoddy quality plagues the Chinese. I'm sure they'll find lead paint in the pics next.

    2. Re:All scientific photos are doctored by bbc · · Score: 1

      NASA developed the retinex filter for post-processing lunar images. In the GIMP you can find this filter under Filters/Colors/Retinex. In combination with GIMP's barrel distortion filter and its corrective perspective tool I found it very useful for correcting imperfectly lit photos of black and white magazine pages, and a lot faster than using a flatbed scanner.

      What would be good Hubble data sets to begin with?

    3. Re:All scientific photos are doctored by kindbud · · Score: 1

      What would be good Hubble data sets to begin with?

      Well, for a famous "iconic" photo you could search for M16 or NGC6611, which is the catalog number of the Eagle Nebula, which contains the "Pillars of Creation" scene.

      The Helix nebula is NGC7293. The Cat's Eye Nebula is NGC6543. The "Mice" are a pair of interacting galaxies designated NGC4676. The Sombrero Galaxy is M104 or NGC4594. If you search Google Images for any of these objects, the Hubble image is the first result every time.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  55. What Was Really There by Flwyd · · Score: 1

    They moved the crater because the Falun Gong led exercises at the original location.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  56. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by iRegister · · Score: 1

    "Harakiri" and "hara-kiri" are each correct and incorrect at the same time, since the word is actually written in hiragana and kanji. In the end it's up to personal preference.

    --
    A fast cowboy since 2007
  57. More jokes.... by DrYak · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...That's because they didn't use the same original sound stage as NASA's faking of the moon, but soom cheap Chinese Z-movie knock-off. With Philipino actors.

    ...Yeah, but moving the crater a little bit further south made whole moon a lot more Feng Shui. Letting the Qi flow freely.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:More jokes.... by focoma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's either Filipino or Philippine. And yes, our actors do suck. I suddenly feel so sad about my country... Chinese photo of the moon showing a moving crater: evidence that the Copernicus Center has been built, and Kai-Fu Lee is the Earth-bound Chief Lunar Operations Manager.

      --

      - Francis Ocoma

      Please wait while Sig Request is being processed...

    2. Re:More jokes.... by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is, they *didn't* move it. Slashdot horribly botched and distorted the reporting of the original article by Emily Lackdawalla in its header. Slashdot calls it "doctored". Emily calls it nothing of the sort.

      What happens is that the spacecraft are moving around the moon and capturing long strips of images beneath them along their orbit. In this case, there were 19 strips. To make a single coherent image out of them, you have to stitch them back together. Anyone who's ever used a panorama stitching tool like Hugin is familiar with this: you pick keypoints, and the software rotates and distorts all of the component images to try and get them to match up. The problem is that the spacecraft is moving, and they don't know all of the topographic data below, so you're inherently going to get what are called "parallax errors". This results in what is commonly called a "misstitch" or "stitching error" -- effects such as a crater being duplicated. An extreme example of parallax error in ordinary photographic stitching can be found here.

      Now, there are two different standards for image releases. The standard, for scientific releases, is to not blend the seams between the strips, so that it's easier to see what was a single source image. The standard for public releases is to blend the seams so that everything looks prettier. Blending is not a big deal; it's not like someone goes in with an airbrush and adds whatever the heck they want. It happens automatically in modern stitching tools; all you typically need to do is check a checkbox. Well, this being a public release, they blended the seams.

      The only thing that Emily faults them for is for their scientist mistaking a stitching error for an actual feature. It's a silly little mistake, but it's certainly not "doctoring". Emily then expresses hope that they'll release the raw data, and apparently, it looks like they're planning to do just that.

      It's a major insult to take a large number of people's hard work and accuse them of faking it. You don't get much more serious of a charge in the scientific community than that. There's a lot of justified indignation at people who accuse the moon landings of being faked. The people who worked on the Apollo program deserve an apology from the CTs for slandering their work. They'll never get it, but they deserve it.

      The Chang'e team likewise deserves an apology from Slashdot for doing the exact same thing.

      --
      "I can't tell, do you feel bad or proud?" "No." "No to which one?" "Feel."
  58. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by The+Moof · · Score: 1

    That's 'Hara Kiri'. Hari Kari is a misspelling of a certain late Cubs sportscaster.

  59. Ob. by achenaar · · Score: 1

    That's not the moon, that's Niel Goldman's face!

    *humble apologies*

  60. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by gotonull · · Score: 2, Funny

    Harry Caray: Hey! Let me ask, what's your favorite planet? Jeff Goldblum: Well... I, uh, don't have a favorite. I find them all fascinating. They're all part of a ... Harry Caray: [interrupting] Mine's the Sun. Always has been. I like it because it's like, the King of Planets. Jeff Goldblum: Well, actually Harry, it's not a planet. It's a star. Harry Caray: Well, planet or star, when that thing burns out, we're all gonna be dead. Jeff Goldblum: Well, that's true. But it's not gonna burn out for a very long time. Harry Caray: [crossing fingers] I hope not. [pause] Hey! Doctor, have you ever seen an eclipse? Jeff Goldblum: Uh, yeah, I've seen many. Harry Caray: You know, if you stare at it head on, it'll burn your eyes out. Jeff Goldblum: [breaking character and smiling] Well, it's best not to stare at the sun during an eclipse. Harry Caray: But it's hard not to. I once took a pair of binoculars and stared at the sun for over an hour. Harry Caray: Hey! Now Ken, We all know that the moon is not made of green cheese. Jeff Goldblum: [cracking up] Yes, that's true, Harry. Harry Caray: But what if it were made of barbecue spare ribs. Would you eat it then? Jeff Goldblum: [confused] What? Harry Caray: I know I would. Heck, I'd have seconds. Then polish it off with a tall, cool Budweiser. Jeff Goldblum: [blank stare] Harry Caray: I would do it. Jeff Goldblum: [just playing along] Yeah. Harry Caray: Would you? Jeff Goldblum: [cracking up and looking at the audience] I'm confused. Harry Caray: It's a simple question, doctor. Would ya eat the moon if it were made of ribs? Jeff Goldblum: I, uh... I don't... I don't know how to answer that, Harry. Harry Caray: It's not rocket science. Just say yes and we'll move on. Harry Caray: Hey! What about this Mad Cow Disease? Jeff Goldblum: [completely cracking up] What about it? Harry Caray: Well, it was here for a while, then it went away. Your thoughts? Jeff Goldblum: Yes, yes, it was in the news for a while and then it disappeared from the news. Harry Caray: Good point! [pause] Gee, I hope I never get it. [long pause] Hey! What about this? If you could choose between being the top scientist in your field, or getting Mad Cow Disease, what would it be? Jeff Goldblum: [pretending to think about it] Well, of course I would choose to be the top scientist in my field. Harry Caray: [grasping his hand] Oh good! I was worried you would choose Mad Cow!

  61. More interesting photos by ObserverPete · · Score: 1

    There are much more interesting photos to be found in the link to a Chinese news article below. There are 3-D lunar images to found on pages 2 and 3 of this report. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2007-12/03/content_6294146.htm

  62. heard that line too often by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    > "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Though instead of "stupidity"
    > I'd substitute "error".

    Sure way to be caught completely off guard by the eventual malice :)

    I live by
    "When widespread madness is the only official excuse, try looking for a better theory".

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  63. Told you once and thousand times by synonymous · · Score: 1

    There have been known to be structures on the moon. Some craters are actually mined. The US has known since the early days of mapping. The back side (side that never faces us) has structures miles large.

    Watch this
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6QNzH4x1rY

  64. Re:It's a shop by mfnickster · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  65. I blame the Americans by Scamwise · · Score: 1

    It's quite obvious the American's doctored the original and the Chinese one is the accurate one.

    --
    Sam "to lazy to register" Look
  66. There are no structure on the moon by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that weren't put there by people.
    That you tube video as been debunked.

    However, lets look as some simple issues.

    if NASA had evidence of structures, NASA would have been give all the money they could possible want. We would have a sustained presence on the moon and probably Mars and would have been used politically in the cold war.
    There is no reason not to release the information.
    Jeezs, how many senators would get more votes because the Companies in there state would get military contracts?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:There are no structure on the moon by synonymous · · Score: 1

      NASA is actually the front for the real space program. NASA is used to get civilian funds and support. NASA also is used to develop the technologies needed for human space travel.
      Reasoning for not releasing the information are obvious..Control and power

      The sadder facts are that many people will not take the step to begin to imagine the realities of this subject.

      Here is another link for you to debunk.. and yes some of the objects do trace a curve.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox6BtwDmm3c

    2. Re:There are no structure on the moon by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      so some guy plays a joke on the electronics repair guy and suddenly it's a huge cover up?

      much more likely the photography techs were showing off a bit to colleagues just what they could do with a bit of time and some pictures of the moon, the resulting photos kicked around and the airman working there thought of the best prank ever in the middle of explaining how the system works.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:There are no structure on the moon by synonymous · · Score: 1

      There were over 400 others to choose from for the Disclosure Project, this one was just a sample. If you do some looking around, you will find thousands of others. It is understandable to not believe what people are telling you. I say these things for those like me that once had the stance of 'believe it when I see or touch it'. The Disclosure Project happened before 911 and the lady on there told it like it happened so far. From terrorist threat to Alien threat next.

      There is a very large and much unknown rift being exploited every day. You will most likely witness this along with countless others.

  67. Re:MMMM by Goaway · · Score: 1

    Cost of an education? More than you can afford, it seems.

  68. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I don't know what is funnier, your response, or the fact that it has been modded insightful.

    Why, yes you are a stupid dildo. We've been waiting for you to have that insight.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  69. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by Alsee · · Score: 1

    okay you've proven that I'm a stupid dildo.

    Sorry, I was just Karma Whoring teh Funny.
    You jsut didn't RFTA, or didn't pay close attention.

    And I'm double sorry you just got modded Insightful for your "okay you've proven that I'm a stupid dildo".

    And yeah yeah yeah, I'm evil and I'm triple sorry for vulgar Karma Whoring teh Funny pointing out that you just got modded Insightful for "okay you've proven that I'm a stupid dildo".
    And I'm quadruple sorry for qrotesquely Whoring teh Funny by copy/pasting "okay you've proven that I'm a stupid dildo" *four* times in this post.

    I still can't believe someone slapped you with an "Insightful" on that. I'm on the verge of tears laughing. Did I mention I'm sorry?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  70. Crater pics from NASA... by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of photographs of craters, this is a neat one.

    Development of the Mars global surveyor: $148 million
    Launching it into space: $52.6 million
    Getting it into orbit: $46.4 million
    Seeing what the martins really think of us: Priceless.

    --
    Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    1. Re:Crater pics from NASA... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      That's not a fake picture! I know: I saw it on auction on e-bay. It's a picture of Jesus on Mars.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    2. Re:Crater pics from NASA... by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

      I never implied that it was faked.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    3. Re:Crater pics from NASA... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Dude, it was a joke. I'm guessing the reference to deity-imprinted items on e-bay swooshed right by, uh?

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  71. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hari Kiri.. Only uninformed or deceived Westerners refer to "Hari Kari"

    http://home.no.net/harakiri/

    -------------

    http://www.parida.com/seppuku.html

    ---------
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku

    "Vocabulary and Etymology

    Seppuku is also known as hara-kiri (, "cutting the belly") and is written with the same kanji as seppuku but in reverse order with an okurigana. In Japanese, hara-kiri is a colloquialism, seppuku being the more formal term. Samurai (and modern adherents of bushido) would use seppuku, whereas ordinary Japanese (who in feudal times as well as today looked askance at the practice) would use hara-kiri. Hara-kiri is the more common term in English, where it is often mistakenly rendered "hari-kari.""

    ---------

    http://www.answers.com/topic/seppuku-1

    ---------

    (Probably the blame can be squarely laid at the feet of hollywood and any servicepersons and tourists from the West who "just didn't get it" or who just didn't give a damn...)

    But, it is carried out with a "tanto":

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanto

    If you want to see it performed in a film (quite messy in real life and somewhat in the film), see:

    Brother,

    Starring and produced/directed by Kitano Takeshi (of "Beat"...) and starring Omar Epps

    http://www.combustiblecelluloid.com/2001/brother01.shtml

    http://www.moviesunlimited.com/musite/product.asp?sku=D27123

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0222851/

    http://global.yesasia.com/en/artIdxDept.aspx/section-videos/code-j/aid-30742/

    and,

    http://www.heroic-cinema.com/reviews/brother

    "this film sure is one violent sonofabitch. If you're not down for that, then maybe you should check to see if you can get into a session of Harry Potter instead. Some of the harshest violence in it is self-inflicted (that brother thing again, but taken to an illogical and hella messy degree). And all of it is LOUD. Handguns are like cannons. Kicks are like wrecking balls. Punches are like car crashes. Car crashes are like - well, like car crashes. I think the punches are louder."

    ----

    Anyway, I will always respect Kitano-san for how he ended the film, something rarely permitted in many western films. You have to see it for yourself...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  72. Summary is Outright Slander by Jartan · · Score: 1

    You see a lot of people complaining about editorial quality or whatever but usually I could care less. Lately it's been getting worse and worse with the summaries and I've been thinking about "slashdot" alternatives or what not. In reality though I've been to lazy to bother.

    This article goes way over the line though. The misquoted/poorly worded summary is completely slanderous implying that the image is fake when the article it links to shows the exact opposite is true. In addition this isn't even one of the political free speech topics which are usually the target of such poor summaries. When even the science articles are getting this treatment I draw the line.

    I doubt such a post will change anything but I figured it was worth it to raise the ire of other users if possible while I leave for greener pastures.

  73. Re:ON the topic of it being a fake by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and when you use the eyedropper to sample a color, you get a dose of some date rape drug....

    --
    Huh?
  74. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by RockWolf · · Score: 1

    He gets karma points, who cares? *shrugs*

    --
    February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  75. It was going to be useful scientifically? by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Its a picture of arbitrary impact sites on a rock, distinguished from a universe of rocks only by the fact that this rock happens to be bigger than most of the rocks in convenient proximity to the only wet rock we've found yet. What is the scientific significance here?

  76. My Shirt - stitch-job by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    My China-made shirt has a similar problem: it has 2 neck holes and one sleeve.

  77. Someone Call Richard Hoagland by xHeliosx · · Score: 1

    Tell him we've located the Tetrahydral Structure.

  78. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

    I applaud your ability to link GWB with a Chinese moon photo story. Well done, sir.

  79. Re:Knowledge Economy by Teancum · · Score: 1

    An interesting historical note to use that actually supports your thesis here is what happened to the economies of Japan and Germany after World War II:

    Think about it carefully here. Both countries not only lost major markets, but were nearly completely destroyed due to warfare, and they were defeated peoples as well, both economically, militarily, and emotionally in nearly every aspect. Japan was even nuked, for crying out loud, and Tokyo had been bombed so completely that a nuke really wouldn't have made that much of a difference.

    Yet here we are in the 21st Century, and both of these countries are economic powerhouses (with Japan and Germany both in the top 10 largest and most powerful armies in the world today....look it up if you don't believe me!)

    So how did Japan go from a country receiving economic aid from Ethiopia to what it is today after this mess? It sure wasn't technology, but rather a very skilled population of highly literate and well educated people that were able to pick up the pieces of their country not ruined from warfare and able to rebuild. In many ways and in the longer term way of thinking, WWII was one of the best things that Japan ever did. Losing the war helped them out in many more ways than had they succeeded in establishing a Japanese empire from Calcutta to Denver (somewhere between Denver and Omaha was supposed to be the border between Japan and Germany.... who knows?)

    In some ways, Japan had it easier than Germany, as Japan was able to keep some of its previous government, and the Japanese economy did survive at least in some form or another after the peace treaty ending the war. Germany had to fact the task of completely restarting their economy from scratch through an interersting idea: Every German citizen was given 1000 marks that they could use in any way they wanted... and that initial bit of cash is what the German economy was based on ever since (until they moved to the Euro). And again, the German population was highly educated, trained in technical skills, and very literate.

    The question that needs to be raised to any nation is if they can survive and thrive on this sort of disaster, or if instead what will happen is what did happen to the Roman empire after the invasions by the Goths and Vandals. Many people even during the early middle ages wondered deeply about what happened to Rome, and nearly all of European history up to the 21st Century can be read as a series of attempts to re-create that long-lost empire of old... including Hitler's Germany I might add.

    China faces an interesting problem because while the Chinese people are very literate, they have traditionally lacked many of the technological skills necessary for industrialized societies. Due to becoming the manufacturing center for North America, China is, for better or for worse, getting those basic skills necessary to compete. Many of the environmental and economic problems of today are in part due to how China has become an industrialize nation, and the billion Chinese citizens throwing gasoline into their vehicles.

    While I admit that the Chinese have copied many things, they also have some incredibly bright and well educated individuals that certainly can compete with the best of "western" society. At best, this whole thing about the messing up of the photo is more a lack of experience than a criticism that they can't create these ideas and products in the first place.

    My concern isn't about China trying to get to the Moon, but rather the American government's apparent apathy about returning to the Moon or trying to even set any strong goals of any kind with space technology. Seven years from now (more or less), when the Space Shuttle retires, there doesn't really appear to be any likelihood of there even being a manned astronaut corps of any kind at all with experience in space. I have deep doubts about the Ares spacecraft program, and my gut tells me that NASA is going to screw this program up, like the last dozen spacecraft proposals that

  80. Photo that shows the Apollo 17 LEM on the moon by xmark · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can even see its shadow.
    http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~durda/Apollo/ls_17_5aa.html

    Better yet, go to the root page, and explore the sites of each of the lunar missions. You can "tunnel" down to photos only a few hundred meters wide.
    http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~durda/Apollo/landing_sites.html

    1. Re:Photo that shows the Apollo 17 LEM on the moon by v1 · · Score: 1

      I was looking at that and thinking the shadow (I assume you refer to the dark area to the left of the white spot) was a bit too large.

      Then I looked at all the other features in the area and realized they all have their shadow at the 5 o'clock position relative to the feature, whereas the "lunar module's shadow" is straight to the left at at 9 o'clock.

      So, unless the module made a stop-drop-and-roll landing skidding a few hundred feet to the right...

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  81. yes, absolutely by deft · · Score: 1

    This is so the chinese government can discern their high resolution pics of the moon from all the other people who have them.

    which is sort of like.... ugh, I cant think of another siutation where there would be SO FEW other people that would have that level of rarity. i dunno, somrthing about slashdot readers and pretty girls, or leaving the basement.

    you get my drift.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  82. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by Atario · · Score: 1
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  83. Re:Knowledge Economy by bratwiz · · Score: 1



    Sorry, zero is as low as it goes.

  84. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Thanks. It takes practice and dedication, I must say.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  85. Moved? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

    ... However, for some inexplicable reason, someone on Earth edited the photo and moved a crater to a different location ...

    No they didn't. If you RTFA, it was moved (accidentally) during the stitching process. Useess for scientific purposes, but not intentionally faked.

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  86. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by msouth · · Score: 1

    Hari Kiri..Only uninformed or deceived Westerners refer to "Hari Kari"


    Um, it's Hara Kiri. See this slashdot post for a detailed explanation.
    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  87. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

    Seppuku is Japanese but the Chinese have a long tradition of suicide to avoid disgrace, too. However, the Chinese never attached the ritual significance to it that the Japanese did.

  88. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by telamonides · · Score: 1

    It's hara kiri not hari kari. Harry Caray was a famous baseball announcer.

  89. The REAL conspiracy is... by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    That there is NO MOON AT ALL. It was created by the CIA at the start of the cold war by doctoring all the photos, artwork and literature in all the books and museums of the world. Anyone who declaimed the hoax was locked up as psycho, cuz, obviously, since all the books showed pikchoors, and artwork from centuries past showed the moon, anyone who claimed it was a fake was nuts.
    Doing this enabled the US to focus resources on missle development and the plan to economically destroy the USSR. That thing you see in the sky is just a big holographic movie - have you noticed that it loops on a 28-day cycle?

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    1. Re:The REAL conspiracy is... by synonymous · · Score: 1

      That may have been difficult to do considering it's image has been there at least thousands of years before the CIA.

      Seriously though, you could read about the Sumerian tablets found in Iraq and what they have to tell about this little solar system and the inhabitants that reside here. Modern day has only just found Pluto this last century. Sumerian writings showed all the planets in order, including Pluto and our moon, thousands of years ago. Yes with the Sun at the middle, thousands of years ago.

      The path before us is of re-discovery. I can see the awakening, it is both necessary and good.

      Here is a decent link...
      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1356843629123064992&q=sumerian&total=405&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

    2. Re:The REAL conspiracy is... by JetScootr · · Score: 1
      To rebliberate & emphatraumatize my post:

      It was created by the CIA at the start of the cold war by doctoring all the photos, artwork and literature in all the books and museums of the world.
      --
      Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  90. There is no darkside (it's all dark really) by professorguy · · Score: 1
    Every point on the moon's surface spends half of its time in light and half in darkness just like here on earth.

    You probably meant FARside.

    1. Re:There is no darkside (it's all dark really) by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      hehe, yes, of course ! sorry about that. /me shall eat humble pie, and play pink floyd for a week or two. Will that be enough atonement ?

  91. Wait a minute! by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

    China has it's own moon?

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  92. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    I always thought he was a Chicago tradition?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  93. information FTFA by danlock4 · · Score: 1
    FTFA:

    "You know that there should have been seams in that image, and I just did not look for them carefully at the time," Lakdawalla [the blogger who discovered the alteration] told me today.

    She said the Chinese must have blended together the seams between the strips - misplacing the crater. The picture may be pretty, but it's pretty much useless as a scientific product, Lakdawalla said.
    --
    To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
  94. giggle giggle...I've worked at NASA since 1979... by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    And I find these "theories" high larious.
    One building I worked in (35) had an annex that was used as a history office to store very old (Apollo-era) records, photos, etc.
    I've seen what NASA actually stores, not just what's released. And these conspiracy theories (especially the 'moon landing hoax' theory) are incredibly giggliferous.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  95. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Gomen Nasai/Sumimasen. Correction wa, gomen...

    (My bad, particularly since the correct spelling was right there in the pages to which I made reference... sigh....)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  96. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

    Only uninformed or deceived Westerners refer to "Hari Kari" That does not align with the citation you quoted:

    In Japanese, hara-kiri is a colloquialism, seppuku being the more formal term. Samurai (and modern adherents of bushido) would use seppuku, whereas ordinary Japanese (who in feudal times as well as today looked askance at the practice) would use hara-kiri. Ordinary Westerners are presumably, by and large, not samurai or followers of bushido. Does that make them uninformed or deceived?
  97. recent crater by earthmarten · · Score: 1

    couldnt it be the crater of a recent impact?

  98. Re:Can the small crater be from a recent collision by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

    Yes the insightful tag was more than I could have hoped for.

  99. If only the tick would have gotten there sooner.. by Backieotamy · · Score: 1

    the chinese wouldn't have felt the need to cover up the "Ch" branded on the moon by Chairs giant laser. Goku wouldn't have been late, damn American super heroes always giving the rest of us a bad name.

    "SPOOOOOoooonnnn!!!!!!"

  100. Re:Knowledge Economy by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    While I admit that the Chinese have copied many things, they also have some incredibly bright and well educated individuals that certainly can compete with the best of "western" society. At best, this whole thing about the messing up of the photo is more a lack of experience than a criticism that they can't create these ideas and products in the first place.

    Actually I do believe that the Chinese as people have the potential of matching or even overrunning the West economy. In fact, Chinese are very smart entrepreneurs. I think the problem lies in their current communist government (well, half-communist, but it still is primarily communist). Their administration simply does not seem to support a knowledge economy, allowing and using sweatshops, or copying already developed designs (Soyuz -> Shenshu). The Chinese people actually were first in many technologies (paper etc) when Europe was into its long dark age where theology was considered the highest academic field. In the field of philosophy China was (and is?) more advanced than the Christianity-dominated Europe (and even though now the West is free of religious limitations, it still seems unable to grasp certain advanced aspects of Chinese philosophy). But now they follow us, because their potential is limited by their inefficient government. And it's the same with Russians (very enterprising and smart people, but a very stupid government).

  101. Re:giggle giggle...I've worked at NASA since 1979. by synonymous · · Score: 1

    I've heard interviews with people involved in receiving the telemetry from the early mars viking missions. They stated that they worked there in the 70's as well. One person said that one day while observing the image that two people in primitive type space suits walked up to the lander and disappeared behind camera view. There are just way too many people reporting issues like this. Gordon Cooper the astronaut is no exception, you can google his accounts any time.

    Like I said in another post, I only write for those entertaining these possibilities. Whether accounts are falsified or real makes of little difference to me. Anything can be. If I actually have the experience myself there would be near zero percent taking my word out there. That's just the way things have been arranged. Certainly one is on their own.

  102. Re:Who will pay the ultimate price? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

    Hari Kiri.. Only uninformed or deceived Westerners refer to "Hari Kari" and Cubs fans, who come to think of it make a ritual fall onto their foam-fingers every summer or autumn to announce the end of their playoff hopes
  103. Never by CamoCoatJoe · · Score: 1

    When can we expect a better moderated Slashdot or people who can read? http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed750:

    How do you verify the accuracy of Slashdot stories?

    We don't. You do. :) If something seems outrageous, we might look for some corroboration, but as a rule, we regard this as the responsibility of the submitter and the audience. This is why it's important to read comments. You might find something that refutes, or supports, the story in the main.

    Answered by: CmdrTaco
    Last Modified: 10/28/00
    --
    This is not a signature.
  104. You're looking at crater shadows, not hill shadows by xmark · · Score: 1

    It's an optical illusion until you realize that the shadows are forming in the bowls of craters. The sun is coming low from the right, and illuminating the left side of the crater walls.

    Meanwhile, the LEM shadow looks long because the sun angle is so low.

  105. Re:giggle giggle...I've worked at NASA since 1979. by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    > Over the years, NASA has employed directly and thru contractors at least 100,000 people, probably many more. Kids are hired right out of college, sometimes, to work in mission control for manned and unmanned missions, or to help design/build flight equipment. Honest, we're just folks, like any working in any other industry.
    > Working on publicly acknowledged unmanned projects like Viking did not require a security clearance. Secret stuff is done by the DOD, which has its own people (the military), rockets, launch pads, and money.
    > For the most part, NASA's telemetry has always been unencrypted, so anyone (including other gov'ts) can point a radio antenna at the right part of the sky and find out what NASA's up to.
    > Aliens, artifacts, or other wierdness found out there would be worth kilobucks to ANYONE with credible NASA-related evidence.

    For one of these NASA conspiracy theories to be correct and NOT be common knowledge, ALL of the following must happen:
    > Somehow, NASA/Gov't or someone manages to clamp a lid on the secret as it happens, with a live, unencrypted telemetry stream.
    > NO ONE outside NASA notices the sudden increase in secrecy/security and the simultaneous drop off in NASA's normally wide-open public relations communications. By the way, the NASA channel lets the cameras roll *unattended* thruout most missions. Somehow, the secret doesn't escape thru these vectors, either.
    > Over 100,000 people who have no special motivation to secrecy are NEVER TEMPTED to sell the big story to a publication.
    > NOT ONE publication gets even a whiff at the time the secret happens. Ever notice how it's always years later when the "theory" is first published?

    I'll tell you fer sure: If I had proof of NASA encounters with LGM, I'd sell it for a few kilobucks. Almost any normal person would.
    Here's my challenge to ANYONE out there who thinks there's some kinda NASA conspiracy, any kind: COME WORK AT NASA AND FIND THE PROOF.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  106. Re:Knowledge Economy by Teancum · · Score: 1

    In regards to the Russian government, I had some high hopes that Yeltsin would have made some significant improvements in the system.

    The most amazing thing for Yeltsin was when he went on a visit to Texas, and entered a grocery store, making note of a woman buying a large amount of food from a store that was obviously overflowing with goods. He thought she must have been some sort of high-level government employee because of all the nice stuff she was getting, and because the store was relatively empty at the time (no lines waiting to get in at all or even to the checkstand). It turns out that the woman was buying the food with Food Stamps, and was a single mother earning roughly minimum wage.

    When Yeltsin realized that somebody on welfare in the USA was eating better than he was as the President of Russia, he realized that it would be nearly impossible to win a war against the USA, if the USA put up anything resembling a real fight. He also realized that some very significant reforms had to happen both politically and economically to Russian society if his country was to survive at all in the coming centuries.

    I'll note that some much needed reforms have happened to Russia, and the overall standard of living in Russia is slightly better than before... even though there is a greater disparity between the rich and the poor now in Russia as well. Life is also much tougher as the current economic system in Russia is much more unpredictable than under the earlier Communist system, and I can understand why there are some Russians who hate the situation they are currently forced to live under right now.

    As for China.... that is one really weird economy and political situation going on right now. In many ways you can compare the economic and political situation to a small town where the economy is dominated by one super-large employer. I'm talking something like a smaller mid-west town where a major manufacturing plant employs almost all private-sector jobs. There are hundreds of towns like this across America, and it is interesting to see how governments give in to that "company" whenever a political situation that affects that company shows up.

    The reason I say that is because the Chinese "People's Army" is by far and away the largest employer in China. I'm not just talking the soldiers in uniform, but in nearly every other economic aspect of Chinese society. The Chinese Army owns and operates mines, smelting plants, manufacturing facilities, television stations, transportation systems, commercial shipping operations.... indeed nearly anything and everything that can be made or crafted in modern society. If you purchased something from Wal-mart that had "Made in China" on it, I would give it about a 50/50 odds or better that it was made by the Chinese Army either directly or indirectly. I'm not kidding here either. Oh, there are completely private companies in China too that aren't owned by the government, but the Army shows up in some way or another for nearly everything in China. It is also how the Chinese government can afford to support their standing army of 10's of millions of soliders, as the tax base in China isn't large enough to support the current level of military activity in China. A surprising amount of money gets transferred by the U.S. Army to the Chinese Army as well...through this economic activity. As a result, the Army in China tends to run the government and not the other way around. And THAT issue has some interesting political and economic consequences which go a long way to explain why China behaves as they do in the world trade markets.

  107. Re:giggle giggle...I've worked at NASA since 1979. by synonymous · · Score: 1

    Well, word has it that NASA started encrypting the signals supposedly due to UFO craft filmed by them making front page news. That's just words though.
    Much of the best footage taken has been taken by NASA using cameras that pick up wavelengths beyond the visible spectrum. These craft appear to be at least cloaked to our naked eyes for the most part.

    Have a gander here and please tell me your thoughts on them...
    http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/QuotesPage.html

  108. What I work on... by JetScootr · · Score: 1

    I work on simulators used to train astronauts, most recently, the network comm simulator. "starting encryption" with 20+ year old equipment that has no built-in encryption is a very big deal. (Yes, most of it is digital). It's not just a switch to flip - it would cost tens of millions. Consider that technology today and as predicted for the next 20-30 years, most forms of encryption provide time, not secrecy.
    Plus, it would require a change in the simulators that simulate the equipment. We've never even been asked to estimate the cost of such a change, which would happen in the early "what if" part of management's planning.
    No, NASA has NOT started encrypting...wait, let me qualify that: NASA has not started encrypting MANNED space flight telemetry. I have no personal knowledge of other areas.
    And just for the record, NOTHING I post on ./, including this, should be construed as any kind of official statement from NASA or my employer. Facts I express are rumors unless you check them yourself, opinions expressed are just that, and not from NASA or my employer, hell, I may not even agree with'em if I stop and rethink it.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.