Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Spy on Employees

4T writes "Forget about monitoring your computers with spyware, now they're going to monitor the users as well! 'Microsoft is developing Big Brother-style software capable of remotely monitoring a worker's productivity, physical wellbeing and competence. The Times has seen a patent application filed by the company for a computer system that links workers to their computers via wireless sensors that measure their metabolism. The system would allow managers to monitor employees' performance by measuring their heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expression and blood pressure. Unions said they fear that employees could be dismissed on the basis of a computer's assessment of their physiological state.'"

305 comments

  1. here's a screenshot by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:here's a screenshot by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1

      No, come on, it will be done Office 2007 style ;-)

    2. Re:here's a screenshot by Idaho · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, come on, it will be done Office 2007 style ;-)


      Ahhh, you mean involving a ribbon, which you could use to hang yourself?
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    3. Re:here's a screenshot by oliverthered · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      pills? jump? after watching a program last night on the death penelty it appears that nitrogon is definatly the way to go, it's euphoric and painless.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:here's a screenshot by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 4, Funny

      after watching a program last night on the death penelty it appears that nitrogon is definatly the way to go

      How many edges on a nitrogon?

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    5. Re:here's a screenshot by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your spelling is killing me.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:here's a screenshot by dintech · · Score: 1

      How many edges on a nitrogon?

      It moves too fast to count them.

    7. Re:here's a screenshot by erpbridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      I noticed, one of the options there in that pic was death by Pastry. What a horrible way to go...

    8. Re:here's a screenshot by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

      If 'hang' means wander about endlessly looking for a simple feature, sure.
      Most would have said 'starve' in that context, but the First Ammendment is a beautfiul thing.
      I suppose we can expect a precipitous drop in /. postings from companies with this stuff implemented...

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    9. Re:here's a screenshot by sarahbau · · Score: 1

      I noticed, one of the options there in that pic was death by Pastry. What a horrible way to go... I disagree. I think it would be a very tasty way to go.
    10. Re:here's a screenshot by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Five, any chemist could tell you that.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    11. Re:here's a screenshot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I noticed, one of the options there in that pic was death by Pastry. What a horrible way to go...
      I disagree. I think it would be a very tasty way to go.

      ...but definitely not as good as death by snoo-snoo.

    12. Re:here's a screenshot by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've wondered... if you pick "Close", would that shut YOU down??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:here's a screenshot by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I suppose we can expect a precipitous drop in /. postings from companies with this stuff implemented..."

      Clippy comes on screen and says..."You're Terminated".

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:here's a screenshot by garbletext · · Score: 2, Funny

      typing o for e is a dvorak typo. For such a user, mistakes just reveal his superiority.

    15. Re:here's a screenshot by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Then Summer Glau in a penguin suit shows up and says, "Come with me if you want to live."

      After running it over with a car.

      And you do, because she just looks so nice.

    16. Re:here's a screenshot by ORBAT · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wouldn't want to die of a broken pelvis.

    17. Re:here's a screenshot by ATMD · · Score: 1

      Yes, as long as Office doesn't hang first.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    18. Re:here's a screenshot by IcyNeko · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't Skynet EVER try and kill Kyle Reese? Skynet's so illogical.

    19. Re:here's a screenshot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >How many edges on a nitrogon?
      Would the correct answer be 2?

  2. I'm suprised. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    I thought they already were spying on their employees.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:I'm suprised. by dintech · · Score: 1

      All those strange files in Windows Update and Genuine Advantage actually install a tiny webcam into your display unit. We're watching you.

    2. Re:I'm suprised. by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      I thought they already were spying on their employees. Pretty much. It's just that the technology has gotten more intrusive.
    3. Re:I'm suprised. by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....All those strange files in Windows Update and Genuine Advantage actually install a tiny webcam ......

      Actually, my Macbook already has a built in camera. Since Windows run fine on that, except doesn't support the camera yet, maybe that's what those files are for. I'll now have to watch that little light or get some black electrical tape.

      --
      All theory is gray
  3. 1984 by Neuropol · · Score: 1

    I think there was a book about this.

    1. Re:1984 by Monoliath · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The point of the book is to make people aware of the gradual attrition of human rights via subtle nuances and ideals put in place by the powers that be.

      You don't defuse a bomb after it's gone off, but more so pay attention to the signs that a bomb is being built and put into place... ...you idiot.

    2. Re:1984 by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I hadn't read a book I wouldn't comment on it. Cut and paste reviews are so obvious.

    3. Re:1984 by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      The above comment was addressed to the parent's parent!

    4. Re:1984 by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, recdep will take care of the issue.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    5. Re:1984 by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, 80% of the people seem to be unable in seeing subtle nuances. In fact, I doubt that subtlety or nuance is part of their vocabulary.

      Of course, there is the 19% that does, but because they are the minority and generally express themselves in a subtle delicate and sophisticated manner, get ignored by the previous 80%.

      Leaves us with 1% left. They have read the book and see the projected future as either inevitable or a great opportunity. And figure it is best for 99% of the population if they control this "gradual attrition of human rights via subtle nuances and ideals put in place by the powers that be". Which happens to be them in the first place.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    6. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Don't worry, recdep will take care of the issue.

      What issue? Easy caretake issue! Issueput memhole, issue become unissue, unissues unneed caretake! (Reporting slashdotter issueseeer oldthinker marcello_dl to homesec - rec miniluv caretake, render unperson)

      Only issue here is webtwo ajaxy javashitting commentsystem! Plusneeds caretake!

    7. Re:1984 by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      The point of the book is to make people aware of the gradual attrition of human rights via subtle nuances and ideals put in place by the powers that be.

      You don't defuse a bomb after it's gone off, but more so pay attention to the signs that a bomb is being built and put into place... ...you idiot. Gradual attrition of human rights?
      I think this is more apparent than real.

      The most significant thing that is really changing is the technology which makes it easier. Just as McCarthyism , Watergate, the Witch Trials of Europe or the US hasn't seemed to make people more aware of anything; certainly not here in the West or in places like Zimbabwe, Darfur, Rwanda, etc.

      I don't see any gradual decline of human rights. Perhaps there is a small micro-historic malaise happening in the Middle Class in some US states, other than that it seems to be business as usual.
  4. Wait a second by kellyb9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait a second here... so this is being developed by Microsoft employees... FOR microsoft employees???? It's a wonder anybody still has any desire to work there.

    1. Re:Wait a second by faloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't get your hopes up. The title is sort of misleading. It's being developed by Microsoft employees for everybody. You can bet that it would likely sell.

      But I like to believe that we might yet hold on to some Constitutional rights that would really put a damper on this thing.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Wait a second by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, we'll just outsource the wearing of our biometrics to people in southeast asia.

      Time to make outsourcing work for us!

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Wait a second by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      Wait a second here... so this is being developed by Microsoft employees... FOR microsoft employees???? It's a wonder anybody still has any desire to work there. It's a lot like making them dig their own grave
    4. Re:Wait a second by ajs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does no one stop to think about these things?

      So, a patent was filed for a system that could be used to assess the physiological state of employees in order to measure performance. Right. So, who would be the target audience? Financial firms? I don't think so. On the other hand, deep sea divers would benefit from such measures. These are people who get paid an astronomical amount of money to do incredibly dangerous work. If their jobs could be made slightly safer, it would be a huge win, and well worth a large expense.

      What about professional athletes? Is player number 73 about to collapse from the strain? Is he too hung over to play? Pay someone six or seven figures for their physical performance and you care about that sort of thing.

      Everyone instead leaps to, "my manager is going to be putting my heartrate on my review!"

      Sigh.

    5. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But I like to believe that we might yet hold on to some Constitutional rights that would really put a damper on this thing.

      Don't get your hopes up. They'll use the same argument they used for workplace drug testing, i.e: If you don't like it, go work somewhere else.

      If they can demand my urine and credit score, why not my heart rate?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

      Everyone instead leaps to, "my manager is going to be putting my heartrate on my review!"

      Maybe you should RTFA? They aren't aiming this at sports figures and deep sea divers. To quote:

      Technology allowing constant monitoring of workers was previously limited to pilots, firefighters and Nasa astronauts. This is believed to be the first time a company has proposed developing such software for mainstream workplaces.

      Another interesting quote:

      The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly".

      Great! I can just see it now. Clippy pops up on my screen: "It looks like you are extremely frustrated with your current job? Would you like my assistance in composing your resume?"

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my manager is going to be putting my heartrate on my review!


      OMG I told you they would! Run away! Run away!
    8. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This will be a critical part of your new free government health care. This way the government can monitor your health or lack thereof and mandate changes in your diet and exercise and other lifestyle "choices".

    9. Re:Wait a second by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm thinking that if they wanted to go to the 'heart rate on the review' end of things it would be most interesting to see everyone from mid-manager level upwards on the machines too.

      Of course this might also work for that woman who said "help, I've fallen and can't get up" and others like that. I'm sure that if this is not already in use in Japan, it soon will be. They are doing a lot to assist their aging population.

      OTOH, if you are required to be monitored to get behind the wheel of your car, that could be something entirely different. Question: Do you really want Microsoft to be responsible for such an event?

    10. Re:Wait a second by scafuz · · Score: 1

      If it's being really developed by M$ employees I wonder if it will ever run at all....

    11. Re:Wait a second by gsn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      RTFA

      Technology allowing constant monitoring of workers was previously limited to pilots, firefighters and Nasa astronauts. This is believed to be the first time a company has proposed developing such software for mainstream workplaces (emphasis mine). Of course people are going to overreact and rightly so - it is a privacy nightmare. I don't think it will ever actually be implemented but that never stops a company from patenting something does it.
      --
      Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    12. Re:Wait a second by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe you should RTFA? They aren't aiming this at sports figures and deep sea divers.

      This is a patent application. (I love how the Times acts like it's some secret document they've obtained!) No patent attorney in his right mind drafts an application that says "This would be useful for X and Y, but we're sure not claiming any applicability to A, B and C!"

      Anyway, let's wait five years and see whether Microsoft workers are, in fact, hooked up to heart monitors. You can bet on the evil of M$$$$, I'll bet on journalistic shoddiness from CmdrTaco, and we'll find out.

      The idea of monitoring user frustration via keystrokes and responding accordingly, BTW, has been discussed here for years, and it's a great idea if it could be made to work correctly.

    13. Re:Wait a second by zoips · · Score: 1

      And yet, somehow, Microsoft has a rather laid-back work environment...

    14. re: wait a second by ed.han · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you're seeing that reaction b/c quite simply, those are all endeavors in which a given person's health and psych state are all monitored quite carefully. considering that employers routinely run a credit check on prospective employees and the fact that all AUPs that i've ever seen say right up front that an employee has no expectation of privacy, i don't think that the reaction is unjustified in the least.

      maybe you're right. maybe it's just the usual anti-M$ slashdot reaction + pro-privacy sentiment that are fueling this reaction.

      but don't dismiss it out of hand, b/c while it's possible it's innocuous in the way that you say, there's certainly no guarantee of it.

      we all know about AUPs. i wanna see an AEPP (acceptable employee privacy policy).

      ed

    15. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea of monitoring user frustration via keystrokes and responding accordingly, BTW, has been discussed here for years, and it's a great idea if it could be made to work correctly.

      Yes, because the random drug testing, use of credit reports, and monitoring of activities outside of the workplace isn't enough. My boss should get an automated message if some line of code deems that I'm "frustrated" because my keystroke pattern changes.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    16. Re:Wait a second by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      And what about factors that the system couldn't account for? Like someone like Lance Armstrong. He gets yanked from his bike because he's about to collapse only to find out his heart rate is naturally above normal due to an abnormally large heart. That's just the tip of the iceberg. There are far more privacy implications here. For all those who lament the Bush administration, this shit should scare the hell out of you!

    17. Re:Wait a second by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      "It looks like you are having a heart attack. Would you like to:
      1) Call a Whambulance
      2) Keel over already"

    18. Re:Wait a second by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Urine and credit score can be argued to be relevant to employment. It's hard to see how a level of monitoring this invasive could slip by in a non-secure industry, or one that doesn't depend on operator health for safety.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    19. Re:Wait a second by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      Don't get your hopes up. They'll use the same argument they used for workplace drug testing, i.e: If you don't like it, go work somewhere else.
      And what's wrong with this? If a company demands random drug testing I do go and work somewhere else. I've got nothing to hide in this respect (I'm 29 and haven't had anything to hide on that front for many years) but I still wouldn't work for a company that has that kind of culture.
    20. Re:Wait a second by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clippy pops up on my screen: "It looks like you are extremely frustrated with your current job? Would you like my assistance in composing your resume?"

      It looks like your heart rate has dropped below 200 bpm.
      Would you like some more coffee?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    21. Re:Wait a second by ultranova · · Score: 1

      And yet, somehow, Microsoft has a rather laid-back work environment...

      Well, of course. People learn to stay down when chairs fly over their heads. Besides, anyone who becomes stressed is kicked out.

      Anyway, this might actually end up benefiting the employees. It is possible to learn to control your heart rate, thereby effectively nullifying this kind of monitoring. I wonder if the colleges of the future will have a course in Biofeedback Control 101 ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:Wait a second by mgblst · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, lets just sit around and wait, to see if things go to shit. Lets not bother about doing anything now, when we can, to head-off things like this, that would be ridiculous. Why don't you wake up, and look at the world around you.

    23. Re:Wait a second by cthulu_mt · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you don't like it, go work somewhere else. I'll just go play Major League Baseball then.

      Take that!
      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    24. Re:Wait a second by iCompatriot · · Score: 1

      Cause I'm a cold, heartless bitch?

      -----------
      To err is human, to not log in is ignorant...

    25. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what's wrong with this?

      Because they threaten you into compliance by threatening your livelihood and not everybody has the option of switching jobs?

      Hell, short of threats of physical violence, I'm hard pressed to think of a nastier thing to do to someone then threaten their livelihood.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    26. Re:Wait a second by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      Of course, running around like a headless Chicken Little in absurd fits of hysteria is just as ridiculous.

      Let's be real here: 1) This is a patent application. It's possible this thing hasn't even been developed. 2) Its not being marketed to anyone. 3) It hasn't been bought by anyone. 4) No one is forcing anyone to wear anything. 5) Even if an employer did try it at some point, the backlash would be so bad that no one would ever repeat the mistake a second time.

      So, relax. Don't sweat the imaginary things and concentrate on real ones. That makes a lot more sense.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    27. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about professional athletes? Is player number 73 about to collapse from the strain? Is he too hung over to play? Pay someone six or seven figures for their physical performance and you care about that sort of thing.


      Do you really think that professional athletes will be asked to do this? Yes, it might be helpful to them to achieve maximum performance, except these are the same ones (especially the higher paid ones) that have the clout to NOT have to do this.

      This is targeted at the lower peons in the company, the cubicle dwellers. Anyone want to bet that managers and executives will be exempt from having to do this themselves?
    28. Re:Wait a second by AeroIllini · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Urine and credit score can be argued to be relevant to employment. It's hard to see how a level of monitoring this invasive could slip by in a non-secure industry, or one that doesn't depend on operator health for safety. Actually, I would argue that it's the other way around.

      What I do in my spare time outside the office has absolutely no bearing on my job until it effects the productivity of work. Drug tests are an indirect measure of productivity, using the assumption that "drugs == bad worker". I disagree with that logic, and think that drug tests should only be administered if the worker's performance is clearly impacted. If there's no performance impact, then what the hell does the company care what I do outside work? (I know that's not the attitude many companies have, but it's the attitude I have.)

      A credit score is a little more of a stretch, but using the logic "bad credit == deadbeat", it could be a stand-in for proper hiring practices.

      However, this software will eliminate both of those indirect methods of measuring productivity because it will be able to directly measure it. And productivity, after all, is what the company ultimately cares about.

      I don't agree with using this technology, but that's the rationale companies will use.
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    29. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Urine and credit score can be argued to be relevant to employment

      ANYTHING can be argued to be relevant, that doesn't make it right or just.

      Drug testing is a load of shit. I might buy into under limited situations (such as after an accident involving a commercial vehicle) but random testing? And the tests don't even prove that you are intoxicated -- all they prove is that you've used drugs within the last few days or weeks. I don't even buy the "well it's illegal to use drugs" argument, because it's also illegal to speed and download copyrighted material off the internet, but I don't see employers installing GPS units into my car and wireshark on my gateway.

      And credit scoring? How the hell is that relevant? How is my payment history on my Visa card the business of my employer unless said employer is lending me money?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    30. Re:Wait a second by Otter · · Score: 1
      My boss should get an automated message if some line of code deems that I'm "frustrated" because my keystroke pattern changes.

      No, Word should stop auto-formatting if you keep responding to it with furious backspacing and mouse slamming. An "Employee too stupid to turn off autoformatting in preferences" message isn't necessary.

    31. Re:Wait a second by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      What about professional athletes? Is player number 73 about to collapse from the strain? Is he too hung over to play? Pay someone six or seven figures for their physical performance and you care about that sort of thing.



      If you employ athletes in this salary range, you usually also employ a real physician, who it much better at these decisions than some algorithm (which will usually be missing parts of the big picture).

    32. Re:Wait a second by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But I like to believe that we might yet hold on to some Constitutional rights that would really put a damper on this thing

      That's fine if you work for the government, but the Constitution doesn't apply to corporations. The Constitution sets up the method of government and bestows powers and obligations to government.

      The first amendment, for example, says you have freedom of religion. It doesn't say that your employer can't restrict prayer in the workplace.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    33. Re:Wait a second by syzler · · Score: 0

      Great! I can just see it now. Clippy pops up on my screen: "It looks like you are extremely frustrated with your current job? Would you like my assistance in composing your resume?"

      Let's be honest, a business is not going to buy software that guesses when you are frustrated and offers to help write your resume. However I could see clippy popping up with, "It looks like employee 4142321 is frustrated and is working at lower levels of productivity. Would you like my assistance composing his written reprimand or his pink slip?"

    34. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work for Microsoft ( in Europe ), good luck implementing this :)

      We cannot agree on the colour of shit never mind getting something like this to work :)

      Most of the time our employees are STUDENTS and our employee churn is so fast that we have a revolving door.

      MSFT's employee ID's are near half a million, they are UNIQUE per employee in their entire LIFETIME. THat is how many employee's they have been through in the past 5 years (back then it was in the low hundred thousands).

    35. Re:Wait a second by blackdew · · Score: 0

      Actualy some companies do install devices that record speed/etc on work cars

      But i do agree, drug tests and monitoring are over the board, i would quit such a job right away and find a sane place to work at. And if enough people do that such behavior from companies would cease very fast.

    36. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actualy some companies do install devices that record speed/etc on work cars

      All the power to them. But they don't have the right to install such a device on my car. That's the argument I was making. The people that claim "drugs are illegal" as justification for workplace drug testing should consider that speeding is also illegal (hell, in my state a speeding ticket will probably cost you more then a pot possession charge) and if you can justify drug testing then why not installing GPS into employees personal vehicles?

      i would quit such a job right away and find a sane place to work at

      And if the economy is in the dumps and you can't? That's why I don't buy into "go work somewhere else" as a response. It's just not fair to go after someones livelihood to accomplish what the Government couldn't otherwise do.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    37. Re:Wait a second by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      No problem. This only affects unskilled, uneducated, unexperienced, unproductive or just plain insecure workers. The rest would simply never work for an outfit with such an idiot management that tried to implement anything like this. What they'd be left with would be unproductive cowering zombies. Companies need good people. Good people are self motivated, and are demotivated by totalitarian tactics. Darwin sorts it out in the end...

    38. Re:Wait a second by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can have as much of my urine as they like. If they want to test it, they can just hold out a cup.

    39. Re:Wait a second by kabocox · · Score: 1

      The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly".

      Great! I can just see it now. Clippy pops up on my screen: "It looks like you are extremely frustrated with your current job? Would you like my assistance in composing your resume?"


      They'll be stunned when they get the tech to actually read most of the workers minds... They'll find a good percentage of people thinking about clubbing their stupid boss over the head at any given time. Clippy will pop up and say. I see you are frustrated and it is caused by your stupid boss, would you like too see an animation of your boss having a humorous death?

    40. Re:Wait a second by rk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because a written reprimand will sure help his frustration levels. That's on the same level as "You get your work done well, and on-time. However, I think you have a bad attitude, therefore I'm not giving you a raise."

      Yeah, great motivator there! Because being denied a raise always makes ME a cheerful person. Why are so many managers like that?

      Not bitching at you, because for many managers, it's a spot-on assessment. I've been lucky because I've had only a few bad ones like that. I can almost always smell them during the interview process, and most of my bad managers have come out of reorganizations that take me away from the managers that hired me.

    41. Re:Wait a second by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      For all those who lament the Bush administration, this shit should scare the hell out of you!

      Why do I even care what my heartbeat sounds like when they're already listening in on my phone calls?

    42. Re:Wait a second by kevinkitching · · Score: 2, Informative

      Drug tests are an indirect measure of productivity, using the assumption that "drugs == bad worker". I disagree with that logic, and think that drug tests should only be administered if the worker's performance is clearly impacted. If there's no performance impact, then what the hell does the company care what I do outside work? (I know that's not the attitude many companies have, but it's the attitude I have.) In most cases, drug testing is done at the behest of the Company's worker's comp. insurance carrier - and has nothing to do with performance, productivity, or whether or not the drug is illegal. It's done because study after study after study conducted by everone but my Great Aunt Matilda shows that employees who use drugs are more likely to have an accident at work - and are also more likely to steal or embezel.

      Drug testing == lower workers comp. premiums and lower general liability premiums.

      Think about it - say you're in charge of hiring at The Rainy Kingdom. Every year, you hire x employees - each of whom you send for a whiz quiz at a rough cost of $75.00 ea. (This is the last number I can remember hearing for a standard screen done by a lab, and really be considered SWAG - the super kung-fu screen that picks up things like vicodan or codine costs, well, way more.)

      x * $75.00 = lots of dough for someone who does alot of hiring. The data on whether casual drug use - smoking a little hippie lettuce on the weekends say - has any effect on productivity out side of accidents is, at best, non-conclusive.

      So the question you want to ask is would Bill's Minions be spending that kind of cash without a real, tangible benefit?
      --
      I hear voices, and they don't like you
    43. Re:Wait a second by PPH · · Score: 1
      RTFA. The article states that this (the Microsoft development) will be a means to link an employees PC to sensors. When is the last time you've seen a deep sea diver take a laptop down with them?


      As to the ability to remotely monitor vital signs (sans PC), that's prior art. NASA had that kind of equipment on every astronaut since Ham.


      Well, every astronaut except for those on the the lunar landings. Everyone knows those were done on a sound stage in Area 51.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    44. Re:Wait a second by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can have as much of my urine as they like. If they want to test it, they can just hold out a cup. The fact that companies are willing to go to such disgusting extremes to monitor employees is reason enough for these practices to be illegal (which they are in Canada, except for a few notable exceptions like military duty).

      People in Canada won't have anything to worry about from Microsoft's technologies (unless they continue to follow the US lead) of a post 9/11 Orwellian Big Brother state (I guess people in Britain and Ireland have nannies to look after them).

      It's ironic though, that this type of monitoring would in theory favour people like me who do things fast and efficiently, without cheating or cutting corners. But it has been my experience that the people (like me) who show up on time, are at the top of the percentile range on OBJECTIVE company tests (entrance tests, etc) will see absolutely ZERO benefit as the rewards will go to the social networking types who smile their way to the top instead of working. Yes these tests will be completely ignored for the ass-kissers and slackers. These tests will however be used to punish people whom management does not personally like.

      Of course I could be completely wrong. But experience tells me otherwise.
    45. Re:Wait a second by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? This will help them get to the Ballmer Peak for sure!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    46. Re:Wait a second by TheNucleon · · Score: 1

      It looks like your heart rate has dropped below 200 bpm. Would you like some more coffee?

      Finally, some intrusive technology that works for me for a change! OK, I was skeptical, but now I'm sold. Put me down for 3 - home, office, and the car.

      Might be an invasion of privacy, or the beginnings of total corporate domination, but hey! Coffee!

      --
      My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of my employer, my spouse, my children, or my cats.
    47. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then you must be pissed when your biodata comes from a slacker. Maybe you can outsource your unemployment too?

    48. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly".

      "If you become lightheaded from frustration, stress or rage, feel free to pass out. An intubation associate will be dispatched to revive you with peptic salve and adrenaline".

    49. Re:Wait a second by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      In most cases, drug testing is done at the behest of the Company's worker's comp. insurance carrier - and has nothing to do with performance, productivity, or whether or not the drug is illegal.

      Right, because most of the companies who test for illegal drug use also test for alcohol use. Oh wait, no, they don't.

      Actually, from what I've read, the largest driver of drug testing by employers is if they have any contracts with the US gov't, which generally requires that any contractors implement drug testing. Insurance carriers may certainly play a role...but I've also read where actuarial research has failed to prove any cost benefit to drug testing, which is one of the reasons why drug testing is not as widespread as it was 15 years ago.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    50. Re:Wait a second by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      No way dude, that would be awesome.

      "Johnson, just take a look at that guy. He works all day, and his vitals are like he's lying on the couch. He's a machine! Give him a raise!"

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    51. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The Word 2003 options dialog box has eleven tabs. How stupid do you have to be not to be able to find the "fuck up what I type" checkbox, especially when it isn't labelled correctly?

    52. Re:Wait a second by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      A credit score is a little more of a stretch, but using the logic "bad credit == deadbeat", it could be a stand-in for proper hiring practices.
      Actually, that's more indicative of someone who could be "bought off" easily. Do you want someone working for you that might be bribed to do something (e.g. corporate espionage, etc.) because they have a lot of debt and need the money? I think not.

      Not saying everyone with bad credit would, but it would certainly be tempting to them...
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    53. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's hilarious. If you weren't posting anonymously, someone might actually believe you.

    54. Re:Wait a second by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm entrusted with financial data, so my credit score is absolutely relevant to my job. Having someone who is perpetually in debt handling a lot of cash is a bad idea.

      As far as the drugs thing goes, I personally could care less about drug use. The government thinks it should be illegal for whatever stupid reason they have today, and so they give businesses the nod so they can buy into the whole "War on Drugs" nonsense. The fact that it is illegal gives them a ton of leverage in this case (you'd never lose a lawsuit against someone alleging that you discriminate against convicted criminals), and the hyperbole that surrounds drug use makes it likely that a jury would agree with a companies desire not to have "that kind of person" working for them.

      I think you're right, that they judge based on productivity, but they can't use that as a reason, they have to come up with a reason that has to do with health, safety, or character.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    55. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "highly paid" diver is going to use M$ Windows Vista while deep sea diving? ... thats the place M$ had in mind when they said "Where do you want to go today?"

    56. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's more indicative of someone who could be "bought off" easily. Do you want someone working for you that might be bribed to do something (e.g. corporate espionage, etc.) because they have a lot of debt and need the money? I think not.

      That's flawed reasoning. Your credit report is not a complete picture of your finances. Somebody could have an extremely high debt ratio and a shitty credit score but still have the means to repay that debt. Likewise, somebody could have a perfectly good credit report/high score and still be in deep financial problems.

      Beyond that, did you know that 50-70% of credit reports (depending on the study) contain errors? Yeah, that's the document I want used to determinate whether or not I can get a job.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    57. Re:Wait a second by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Urine and credit score can be argued to be relevant to employment. ANYTHING can be argued to be relevant to employment, such as religious and political beliefs.

      I will digress however; I can see a Manager talking about a certain religious or political or sexual topic, and then seeing how their employee's heart rate's respond. Of course when these employee's get fired, they will be told they were let go because the stress indicators of their monitoring systems indicated that they could not emotionally handle the job.

      Yes I can also see how people can and arguably should be fired for using mind altering drugs like coffee, tobacco, alcohol, cocaine, poppyseed bagels, and sugar (if you don't think sugar is a DRUG, then you are fooling yourself).
    58. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, you should come work at Microsoft. We don't have any of that crap.

    59. Re:Wait a second by chain_from_hell · · Score: 1

      It sure gives a whole new set of excuses. "Can't do overtime boss, gotta do some cardio training. The system said so."

    60. Re:Wait a second by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      It's done because study after study after study conducted by everyone but my Great Aunt Matilda shows that employees who use drugs are more likely to have an accident at work Seems improbable that this is true.
      However, since the concept of "drugs" is political, and "drugs" are in fact defined as "drugs" by politicians and lawyers (amongst others), this would mean that people in the US are getting fired for political reasons.

      As with most political issues, there is usually a lot of hypocrisy involved. People who drive red cars have historically had more accidents, and yet I doubt if these people who drive red Honda's will get fired from their jobs and possibly be put in jail. I do however think that people who smoke marijuana or consume Magical Mushrooms would likely be fired and put into jail. This is because people are hypocrites.

      And I really doubt if any such studies tried to assess how, let's say, "recreational" drugs can improve productivity. I would surmise that most or all of these studies have an underlying bias to find negative evidence.

      Of course I could be wrong, and I'm not an expert, and I don't have a license to conduct my own double-blind studies (research into things like LSD is very rare these days as it is next to impossible to get approval).

    61. Re:Wait a second by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      A credit score is a little more of a stretch, but using the logic "bad credit == deadbeat", it could be a stand-in for proper hiring practices. Actually, that's more indicative of someone who could be "bought off" easily. Do you want someone working for you that might be bribed to do something (e.g. corporate espionage, etc.) because they have a lot of debt and need the money? I think not. Of course it's more indicative of a prejudice towards poor people in general. CEO's are more likely to ruin a company through corruption than a poor graduate who has a massive student loan.
    62. Re:Wait a second by ajs · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should RTFA? The TA is a sensationalist piece of crap based on a patent application. My comments stand.

    63. Re:Wait a second by ajs · · Score: 1

      RTFA. The article states that this (the Microsoft development) will be a means to link an employees PC to sensors. Every single such diver (we're talking pros who do work like welding on oil platforms) is constantly connected to a number of machines ("PC" in the parlance of the newspaper in question), and you're reading an article from a rag that's trying to summarize a patent application.

      As to the ability to remotely monitor vital signs (sans PC), that's prior art. You simply cannot, ever, determine if there is or is not prior art without reading the patent application itself in complete detail. There may or may not be unique elements to this application, regardless of how well traveled the genre of software might be.

    64. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What I do in my spare time outside the office has absolutely no bearing on my job until it effects the productivity of work"

      What **doesn't** effect the "productivity of work"? The most efficient worker is someone who is damn near a slave.

    65. Re:Wait a second by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....all they prove is that you've used drugs within the last few days or weeks......

      These tests don't even necessarily prove that even. If you eat a couple of poppy seed rolls (they are very tasty if fresh), you'll test positive for narcotics, such as cocaine or heroin. None of the current tests can check for the active substances in these drugs, but they check for companion substances found in drugs, and these substances are also found in the poppy seeds on the rolls. So, if you expect a drug test, DON'T eat poppy seed rolls or cake. Poppy seed cake is popular in Germany and tastes really good. The active drug that makes people high is no longer there in the dry seeds used for these foods.

      --
      All theory is gray
    66. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A credit score is a little more of a stretch...

      Not at all. If someone will steal from others why is it such a stretch to believe they'll steal from their employer? For example, if you found that someone stole from GMAC on a car loan or from Bank of America for a credit card, why wouldn't they also steal from you?

      I was skeptical at first when we started running credit checks for new hires, but it works very well. Generally speaking, even if the thief doesn't steal from you, the thieves are generally lazy and not good employees.

    67. Re:Wait a second by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....I'm hard pressed to think of a nastier thing to do to someone then threaten their livelihood........

      Do you belong to that growing group of people who truly believe that there is a fundamental right to a job? Is a job not a place where the employee renders a service to an employer and the employer buys that service with a paycheck? If the employer wants to place conditions of employment that an employee CAN meet, to increase productivity, should such an employer not be allowed to place such conditions and hire/keep only those who meet these?

      A good employer should be ready to show that these conditions of employment do help both the employer and employee.

      --
      All theory is gray
    68. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSFT's employee ID's are near half a million, they are UNIQUE per employee in their entire LIFETIME

      Not true. I worked there for 10 years starting in the 90's. My ID was 4 digits. I can promise you I wasn't in the first 10,000 hired.

    69. Re:Wait a second by dbIII · · Score: 1
      In my company drug and alchol testing is limited to people that work with or near explosives. It isn't cheap either - how does HR in these places that test office workers justify the expense, waste of time and loss of morale? If they can already waste resources this way then it is likely they can implement a fairly pointless and expensive biometric monitoring system.

      The credit thing is I suppose one of those "only in America" things. In other places people would be very reluctant to supply banking information to a prospective employer and companies can't easily find out in any other way.

    70. Re:Wait a second by toddestan · · Score: 1

      How do you treat people who have poor credit scores because they simply don't have a history of taking out credit?

    71. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If the employer wants to place conditions of employment that an employee CAN meet, to increase productivity

      Don't tell me that you are justifying workplace drug testing on the basis of "productivity".

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    72. Re:Wait a second by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Wait a second here... so this is being developed by Micro$oft employees... FOR microsoft employees????

      Of course, it depends on where those "employees" are located. Is it being developed by their employess at Micro$oft/China? Remember the Chinese Bodies Exhibition that toured the US and Europe awhile back? You know, where the bodies of murdered Chinese dissidents had been preserved for the enjoyment of slimey Americanski. Maybe foreign programmers will develop it to keep their pesky American counterparts in line, kemisabe?

      And people thought I was exaggerating when I mentioned several years back about M$ buying a state law in Washington (from the Department of Labor and Industry) to put a cap on the amount that an independent contractor could earn in that state - then M$ dramatically raises the level of jobs they are offshoring......

    73. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should have been more clear on that point. You look at the credit history, not the credit score. If someone has a history of stealing money, then you don't hire them. If you hire 18 year-olds out of high school or 21 year-olds out of college, of course not having a credit history isn't bad. You expect that. If you want to hire a 35 year-old without a credit history then that could be a red flag. So basically you use it in a competely fair way unlike a bank. You only hold proven thefts against the person rather than using a score that has built-in negative assumptions.

    74. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What constitutional rights. Remember we are not a constitutional republic any more. George Bush took care of that! Real cost of such a warped system is loss of productivity. The workers that are left will be the most desperate that for some reason could not find a job elsewhere or were not confident of locating other employment. In any case the only ones to stay will be incompetants, losers, those that consider themeelves losers, and those too close to retirement to be able to leave, or illegal aliens. The productivity from this trash will be lower than dirt, but that is not all. Being hooked up literally 24/7/365 to a computerized lie detector machine will be make employees very careful in every action so that they make the fewest mistakes. Being deadheads, this will mean they make MORE mistakes as they break down under pressure. Does the game 'Go Postal' sound familiar as these zombies start breaking down and running amok. Maybe supervisors in such places will have armor on their control rooms, wear AK's, and body armor like a medieval knight.

    75. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I know if I'm frustrated, stressed or on edge - the one thing that claims me down is Clippy popping up over my work and getting in my way like a drunken monkey guarding a banana.

    76. Re:Wait a second by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Why are so many managers like that?

      The only time I've ever had a manager like that I did my very best to become Wally. It's actually kind of sad how long you can remain employed whilst doing absolutely nothing productive.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    77. Re:Wait a second by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....Don't tell me that you are justifying workplace drug testing on the basis of "productivity"........

      Don't tell me that someone using drugs (legal or illegal) is a more desirable, more productive worker than someone who doesn't use or need those? Don't you think that an employer should have the right to know and intelligently choose between a drug user and someone who does not use nor need such things, just as a person has the right to use or not use drugs? Nobody holds a gun to a person's head and forces them to become a druggie or alcoholic. The use of these substances clearly affects a person, both on the job and off the clock. As a person sows, to they shall also reap.

      --
      All theory is gray
    78. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. What's the drug, and how does it affect them? If workers who don't use or need drugs are always better somehow and more desirable, why does every office I've ever seen offer free coffee and (lately) energy drinks? What about the amazingly successful multi billion dollar dot com I was at a couple of years ago, where half the staff smoked pot after work and everyone knew it?

    79. Re:Wait a second by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      poppy seeds are a source of opiates, not cocaine. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppy#False_positive_drug_tests

  5. Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by ironwill96 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Microsoft probably has hundreds of patents for things they don't ever intend to actually make, but just in case someone else does they want to be there to make a buck off of licensing. I highly doubt that they actually think this type of software would currently be accepted in today's climate, at least not unless they call it something innovative like "The USA Health-watch Patriot Software". I've found that its important to include the word "Patriot" in all aspects of your life, it really just gets you instant approval to do whatever you want!

    Well, i'm off to use my iPatriot computer and drive my Patriot Chevy to the Patriot Meeting this afternoon. Come to think of it, thats probably why New England is winning so much, everyone else just needs to put Patriot in their team name!

    --
    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
    1. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by tha_mink · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think Microsoft probably has hundreds of patents for things they don't ever intend to actually make, but just in case someone else does they want to be there to make a buck off of licensing. Not only that, but I actually think this kind of software would have greater value in situations like airline pilots and freight train engineers. In fact, for freight train engineers, there exists an alarm system that sounds every 10 minutes that they need to manually reset. If they don't reset the alarm and it times out, then the brakes are applied, the train stops and emergency personnel are notified. So as far as that goes, I could see the value in this type of software for that type of operator.
      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    2. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Jeep Patriot... IF you're going to be a goofball, at least be an accurate goofball.

    3. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by Dr_SimonCPU · · Score: 0

      Well, i'm off to use my iPatriot computer and drive my Patriot Chevy to the Patriot Meeting this afternoon. Come to think of it, thats probably why New England is winning so much, everyone else just needs to put Patriot in their team name! Yes, I'm gonna blow you up with my Patriot Missiles.
    4. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by Imagix · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to pick up your bottle of Victory (err, I mean Patriot) Gin on the way home.

    5. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      I know this will sound, well, rather odd but...

      If you'd bother to at least glance at the FTA, it's already been done. Astronauts. Fire Fighters. Pilots. People who you would really want to follow their minute-by-minute performance. The 'patent-worthy' part is to take this and use it for more prosaic purposes (Clippy 2)and follow the more routine (and more common, therefore financially exploitable) office worker.

      I haven't bothered to look for the patent application, as that would invalidate my Slashdot cred for sure, but I imagine it's not going to be as invasive as the current monitor systems which require EKG and sometimes EEG electrodes to be physically attached. Likely it will about vague, handwaving concepts of hands-off monitoring whose efficacy and utility have been established by the atttach-wires-to-the-monkey testing.

      Like turning on the webcam and trying to count respirations, eye blinks, swear words or see if sweat is dripping down your face. Extra points if the software can detect furniture being tossed. '

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Could be useful for anyone whose physiological state is in itself mission-critical (pilots, train engineers; firefighters who enter burning buildings, in fact anyone working in high-risk environments; maybe even surgeons). Obviously you need a baseline first, tho; otherwise what is normal excitement for a particular person (frex, combat pilots) could be misinterpreted as stress.

      However, as to its use in the workplace -- one could argue either way:

      Against: Do you really WANT the boss to know every time you hit a snag? maybe you're best off if left alone to work it out.

      For: Frustrated about something? Maybe it's time for help and you don't realise it. (Potentially useful for schools.)

      Numerous similar arguments could be added to either side. My own feeling is that I'd prefer occasional mistakes, even fatal ones, to a pervasive Big Brother Is Monitoring You, so hopefully this will be utilized in a sensible manner, rather than across the board.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Filing a patent doesn't mean a lot these days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd bother to at least glance at the FTA, it's already been done. Astronauts. Fire Fighters. Pilots. People who you would really want to follow their minute-by-minute performance.

      You mean like CEOs or politicians making decisions that affect the lives of millions... except they won't be monitored. It'll be the"little" people.

  6. = tobacco companies studies of smoking? by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Given how much my blood pressure skyrockets under the influence of Word, Excel, and Powerpoint, I'm not sure that MS really will want this data due to liability issues. If MS collects data that shows that MS products reduce the health and wellbeing of users, that makes MS more culpable for those products. Of course, IANAL so maybe a new "not responsible for user's health" section of the the EULA will cover MS legally.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      No, they wouldn't. You control how frustrated you are, and how you deal with it.

    2. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Software report: "Pulse rate up, blood pressure up..."

      IT: "Aha! User is frustrated with software!"

      Software report: "User mousing shaky!"

      IT: "Aha! More frustration!

      Software report: "User has ejaculated!"

      IT: "...Er..."

    3. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You might control how to deal with frustrations. But you can't control frustrations by definition. If you could, they would no longer be frustrations. In any case, you can't control your heart rate or blood pressure, no matter how much you will it.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    4. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      It won't be able to record your blood pressure and heart rate when it bluescreens. Of course, anyone reviewing the records may wonder why you were dead for 5 minutes, 10 times every day...

    5. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      So whatever situation you're subjected to has absolutely no bearing, it's all internal? Nice, I'll throw you in solitary confinement for a while, then tell your other cellmates you're in for child rape ... then come back and I'll remind you that "you control how frustrated you are".

      Of course the software you have to use for work all day every day has an effect on your psyche. To suggest it wouldn't is absurd. Of course to *some degree* you control your frustration, but that's not 100% the case.

    6. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not "not responsible", but "you can't use this software to measure worker's wellbeing in case MS Office suite is used".

      If they would be only not responsible, the numbers would leak out anyway and shed bad light on Microsoft, it's much cleaner to never deliver those numbers at all. :)

    7. Re:= tobacco companies studies of smoking? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Its funny you came up with that (crappy) analogy. "Letting it go," so to speak, is exactly how many US Vets dealt with being tortured by the North Vietnamese. So yes, exactly.

  7. that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After installing vista, I feel like they already got me by the balls

  8. No supries compnaies have wanted this for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One of my old employers had this, us in IT hated it and regularly disrupted it or gave users info on how to disable it.

    The coolest thing I ever saw was one of the IT guys was able to add a signature into the virus scan software for it and it uninstalled it district wide one night.

    Pissed the director of operations off big time when he couldn't spy...

    Posting ANON as I know he reads here.... HI DAVE! throwing chairs yet?

  9. Check on metabolism could be useful by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    The check on metabolism could be useful. Someone could die in this office and nobody would notice for a week.

    1. Re:Check on metabolism could be useful by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my heart is only beating rapidly in anticipation of moderation adversely affecting my slashdot karma.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    2. Re:Check on metabolism could be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,

            now they can monitor how long it takes for you to poo!

    3. Re:Check on metabolism could be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funny, heart rates in our male staff go up every time the receptionist walks by."

    4. Re:Check on metabolism could be useful by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Someone could die in this office and nobody would notice for a week. Sounds like your company could stand to update it's ventilation. We had a guy die here and no one noticed for almost 3 weeks, thanks to a new air filtering system.
      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    5. Re:Check on metabolism could be useful by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, look at poor George Turklebaum. This monitoring could become manditory some places.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  10. Don't sweat it by explosivejared · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's an easy way to game the system and get it to read out that you are functioning at near infinite productivity. The system is set to handle all motions that resemble throwing a chair as super-productive. I hear it is a zeroday that has to do with the model they used for peak effeciency.

    --
    I got a catholic block.
    1. Re:Don't sweat it by etwills · · Score: 1

      I hear it is a zeroday that has to do with the model they used for peak effeciency.

      Nah, can't be measuring "peak" efficiency - it's not including blood alcohol level in the calculation ;)

  11. hmm. by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    if it could monitor the rise in heartbeat, perspiration and body temperature every time the attractive blonde contractor walks part it could no doubt head of harassment claims as well.

    on a more serious note, I wonder if it could automatically monitor responses after an email is opened and detect office conflict or romance in the offing.

  12. I wonder what the employers will think by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the employers will think when they find such a high percentage of their employees seem to be disgruntled? Or if they end up not using the software because they wouldn't be able to employee anybody if they did?

    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:I wonder what the employers will think by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're too optimistic. No matter how hard you set the threshold, you'll always find people willing to ruin their health just to keep a shitty job. Plus, bad product is always caused by bad employees, never by bad management.

      From experience, I'd say the only employee feedback that the HR directors understand well is waiting for them in the parking lot with a mask and a baseball bat, preferably with dozen of coworkers so you benefit from the emulation.

  13. I had the same idea by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough I was working on the same thing as me entry in Microsoft's ImagineCup. Guess that's out the window. The article is largely ignoring the important benefits of such a system. Tracking basic vital signs can be an important tool for monitoring and eventually maintaining employee health. The computer can tell the user if they have been sedentary too long. Employers can track the effects of the work environment on users.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:I had the same idea by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Given the HR practices in some places I've worked, I'd say that anyone who is not in the red will be tagged "lazy bastard, find any reason to fire him ASAP". And I'm dead serious, leaving the building to do some sport during lunchbreak was almost on par with being drunk on the job and I've seen someone being fired for showing up at 9H15 instead of 9H00 (the fact that he worked 4H of unpaid overtime the night before to cope with a last minute issue was obviously not on the same ground as the 1/4H he stole from the corp).

    2. Re:I had the same idea by chthon · · Score: 1

      Nah, this is the first step to the SoulSucker 3000.

    3. Re:I had the same idea by stewbee · · Score: 1

      If employers were really concerned about productivity, then why do they place people in cubes (aka anti-productivity pods where I work)?
      The cynic in me definitely would see this used by Evil Corp(tm) to monitor productivity and not for perceived health benefits.

    4. Re:I had the same idea by FatMacDaddy · · Score: 1

      That comment succintly summarizes my entire response to this subject in far fewer words than I could have ever done myself.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  14. Snow Crash and YT's mom by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This reminds me of the chapter in Snow Crash that focuses on YT's mom's job for the feds. Federal employees have to constantly take lie detector tests and all emails have a suggested reading time. If the employee reads a note faster than expected, they're probably skimming and not taking in all the information. If the employee takes too long to read, then they're probably slow or distracted. It was a great chapter tucked into the middle of the book.

    1. Re:Snow Crash and YT's mom by esper · · Score: 1

      As I recall, taking exactly the suggested reading time also brought on a reprimand for being a smart-ass.

  15. Thoughtcrime IS death... by jackpot777 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So Microsoft will know if your heart races because you saw something you shouldn't have, because you saw something that reveals you know too much, and they'll know if you are trying to cover up your panic instead of exhibiting a "WTF is this?" response?

    Hmmmm.

    Reminds me of some bloke I heard about once. Winston, I think his name was. Got fed information about something he shouldn't have known about at work, so his employer tested him out by slipping him a photo showing a meeting that should never have taken place. Winston reacted with instinct instead of controlling his emotions, which were observed... which eventually led to his incarceration, torture, and psychological breaking. Once that had happened, he was done in.

    Funny story. Maybe someone should write a book about it. Or make a film.

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys...
    1. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

      Hello, you just described Hamlet. Not exactly a new idea, eh? :)

      -Vort

    2. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      As the clocks struck thirteen, a strong wind blew over comrade #443602's head, as he simply didn't get it.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    3. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

      yes yes, we've all seen clockwork orange -- Nuff said about who didn't get what :)

      -Vort

    4. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I mixed Clockwork Orange and 1984 :) I concede victory to thee, Constantine :)

      -Nick

    5. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of some bloke I heard about once. Winston, I think his name was. Got fed information about something he shouldn't have known about at work, so his employer tested him out by slipping him a photo showing a meeting that should never have taken place. Winston reacted with instinct instead of controlling his emotions, which were observed... which eventually led to his incarceration, torture, and psychological breaking. Once that had happened, he was done in.


      Off to Room 101! (Or was it 110? I can never remember that.)
    6. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      No, my friend--ironically, the joke is on you. GP post was being facetious.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by SoulDrift · · Score: 1

      I don't know... kinda sounds like a rip-off of 1984.

    8. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by EuroMike · · Score: 1

      Definitely room 101, though I always used to confuse it with 113 for some reason...

      --
      .... 0x00FEEDFACEC0FFEE .... :)
    9. Re:Thoughtcrime IS death... by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Not exactly a new idea, eh?

      Particularly considering Willy S. likely got the "Hamlet" idea from someone else ...

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  16. Patents != Deployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only on Slashdot does a patent filed by Microsoft become an assumption that the company will deploy the technology on its own employees.

    Until somebody produces proof that Microsoft plans on deploying the system, I'll just assume that this is the usual "M$ IS EEEEEEEVIL" groupthink.

  17. We've known this for quite a while by SlashAmpersand · · Score: 1

    This system is what's on BillBorg Gates' picture next to every Microsoft article on /.

    1. Re:We've known this for quite a while by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      They... will... be... ass... immolated...

      I wonder if there's a connection between the SEC probing ms' rear and ms' wanting to probe others' rears...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  18. Seems flawed. by dkarma · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only things it monitors is biometrics such as heart rate, etc? Well then why not add a camera. I mean how will they tell the difference between raised heart rate and breathing from work exertion compared to that of furious masturbation? I wouldn't be surprised if they start canning employees for "working" a little too hard wink wink nudge nudge. Also sounds a little soviet to me.... In soviet russia computer monitor you!

  19. Wireless body sensors? by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 3, Funny

    For once, I'll be glad to give IT help to our female temps.

    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
  20. given the POS that is VISTA by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 0, Troll
    I am not surprised they want to bitch slap their employees. God ferbid they employ the same tactics on the bosses who tell them to build steaming heaps like VISTA.

    So, first you put the squeeze on the little guy or gal, and then when the system still fails, you engage in a round of finger pointing, and then the one with the most clout says "ROLL OVER" and they all roll over and one falls out, and then there's a lot of back slapping and yes, now everything will be better, and of course it's NOT, because the rot starts at the head.

    This is all so pathetic and predictable. The sooner M$ disappears ,the happier I will be.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  21. I am tired of the whole Western world... by Entropius · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... knowing about the functioning of my kidneys!

    *yank*

  22. Misleading headline... by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    ...but funny just the same. I believe they are submitting the patent for the technology that would allow themselves or other corporations to do the spying. I assume the ACLU and employees will have some objections to this actually being done, at least if it is do be done surreptitiously.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  23. Then you need to start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...wearing Depends(tm) under baggy Dockers(tm) everywhere you go. That way nobody except you will know when you pee. Unless you can't keep that silly warm grin off your face everytime you let go.

  24. No surprise here by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    A few days ago I left the lights on in my car overnight so my battery was dead the next day. I grabbed my battery to walk it to the nearest shop when I passed a towtruck driver with a million batteries in the back of his truck. I told him that I'd pay him 4 bucks to take me to the nearest station(a mile or two away) and he explained to me that he would, but his company was micromanaging his routes via GPS and that there would be hell to pay for the slightest deviation from his route.

    In short, companies are greedy :)

    1. Re:No surprise here by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      I know someone who works for a large medical delivery service, his job is to deliver drugs to several pharmacies twice a day, mostly in dense urban area. His boss has a program that defines the expected delivery time by taking the theorical maximal speed of the route, not even taking into account the normal trafic slowing elements such as stops and red lights. The driver's only way to avoid doing too much unpaid overtime (and be blamed for deliverling later than the planned hour) is to speed anytime they can. Conclusion: lots of them cause accidents and it costs the compagny a fortune.

  25. Possible Uses by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    -Monitor cardio and tell the user when they have been sedentary too long.
    -Monitor worker's biological response to the workplace environment and adjust as necessary.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Possible Uses by tinkerton · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. monitor cardio and take turns visiting subject. The player achieving highest heart rate and blood pressure with the subject wins.

      2. the same, but now you're only allowed to use the phone.

      3. monitor keyboard activity. The goal now is to cause the longest possible pause without the subject leaving the cubicle.

  26. Employment lawsuits? by The+Chemical+Crow · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If Microsoft (or any other company employing this software) were to fire somebody based only on the data from this software they would be fools of the highest order. The data would be, I would hope, supplementary data to back up more traditional firing criteria - poor reviews, documented reprimands, etc.

    BTW, one thing that stood out to me in TFA was:

    "The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly".

    Forgive my cynicism, but this seems a bit ... naive.

    1. Re:Employment lawsuits? by ClubStew · · Score: 1

      What concerns me is how to define stress. I work well under stress, but if I'm always stressed what rigors will I have to endure (think of "George" on the episode of "Seinfield" where he purposefully acted stressed to make it seem like he was really busy). And if I always seemed stressed, will I be fired "for my own benefit" (read: so I don't sue later for a heartattack or something)?

      And what about people that manage their stress to the point us stressful people want to smack them? Are they not stressed enough at work and should therefore be fired?

      This is indeed scary.

  27. Taylorism all over again by irexe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....as a civillization, didn't we already pass this point more than a century ago?

    1. Re:Taylorism all over again by Miseph · · Score: 1

      According to your own link Taylorism was both highly influential on newer management theories and is still in widespread (if unpleasant) use in many industries.

      So no, we probably haven't.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    2. Re:Taylorism all over again by lwriemen · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. Many of the same elements can be seen many of the quality/process improvement programs still being seen today. For some reason, management never seems to learn that workers aren't fungible.

  28. My patent ... by wavefreak · · Score: 1

    I just patented a device that falsifies the information. You program at home and take it to work If you leave it in you cubicle, you can go out to lunch at the boss thinks you still there. There is an orgasm mode that simulates the physiological aspects of sex. The heart attack mode is hilarious. It's funny has hell to watch your co-workers grab the defibrillator from the break room and run down the hall. Then there is dead mode...

  29. How long before they start to bill workers with hi by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    How long before they start to bill workers with hi hart rates / Blood Pressure more for there health care / take it away?

  30. An average day at Microsoft... by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Funny

    Security-Central: Looks like we have a dropper again..
    Monitor1: User death imminent.
    Monitor2: OK, notify MicroMorgue to fire up the incinerator, and dispatch two lawyers to deal with the family members. Send the wife a complimentary vista discount cupon.
    Monitor1: Wait, he moved...
    Monitor2: HOLD, ignore that MicroMorgue order and get the lawyers back to the Antitrust dep. again.
    Monitor1: Hes fine, great. Another buck saved, however Thompson in dep. 2 doesnt look entirely healthy.
    Monitor2: Inject 1500 MG of Vitamin-C in Subject 7271 Sector 1G, cubicle 1235.
    Security-Central: Injecting vitamin-C now, #1000001, (Blue Screen of Death)
    Monitor2: What the He..?
    Monitor1: Cr*p! The d*mn machine broke down during the vitamin-c injection.
    Monitor2: Uh, oh.... Thomson is running around naked, and thats no joystick...
    Monitor1: Run the backup servers and have him injected with 15 mg SleepWell 2000.
    Monitor2: The backup servers are runnin Linux...
    Monitor1: Were screwed!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  31. They can have my vital signs ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... when they pry them from my cold, dead hands.


    Oh wait ...

  32. Mod parent up, yo! by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

    I've read the whole thread to this point and this is the only post that points out this kind of technology could actually be used for good.

    I could see Microsoft producing the evil version of it, but I couldn't see them using it on their own employees. It's just too contrary to their (internal) corporate culture and the Kool-Aid they coax their employees to drink.

  33. Still several weeks away... by lophophore · · Score: 1

    from April 1. Because this sounds like an April Fools joke.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  34. Another PR win for Microsoft by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is developing Big Brother-style software capable of remotely monitoring a worker's productivity, physical wellbeing and competence.

    This is just what MS needed to bolster their sagging image. Product activation, DRM, back-stabbing EULA's and file format lock-in just weren't getting the job done. No, they needed something...something to take corporate dickish intrusion to the next level and beyond. Something that would cement the perception that they have completely lost touch with the last threads of reality.

    I don't care if this pos cures world hunger. Try to install this on some machine I'm working on and I'll start dropping my shoes in the gears of the machines.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  35. Before jumping to conclusions... by smitth1276 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suggest you all note that the only words quoted from the patent itself were "unique monitoring system" and "heart rate, galvanic skin response, EMG, brain signals, respiration rate, body temperature, movement facial movements, facial expressions and blood pressure"... I strongly suspect that there is a less-than-honest reason that the author saw fit selectively edit the excerpts in those particular places.

    You can leap to your paranoid conclusions based on nearly nothing, but I am going to go with the more reasonable, intelligent, thoughtful assumption that it is actually software to allow hospitals to more cheaply monitor patients using a PC-based solution--until I hear otherwise, of course. (Though I do think it reflects VERY poorly on most of you that you so willingly swallow whatever line the media feeds you.)

  36. How would this system work for "remote" workers? by Erectus · · Score: 1

    I wonder how these technologies would work for us working at home?

    Is my bed and living room sofa going to have analyzers? How would the system know when a person is working or doing some other activity? Would it record snoring?

    Does the next generation have also active components? (If you remember the WTO lecturer hoax in Finland, "Textiles of the Future") [The Yes Men, http://www.theyesmen.org/ ]

  37. Response from Google and Open Source community by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Google announced that it is developing a monitoring program that is fully web based that runs on all platforms and claims this patent does not cover the web application. Open Source community cites numerous prior art to argue the patent will be null and void. The cited prior arts are:

    1. Dr Chaplin, Charles, Modern Times, 1932. 2. Mr Orwell, George, 1984, 1948.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  38. Potential for abuse by MECC · · Score: 2, Funny

    This brings on a new meaning to the phrase "fired due to a computer glitch".

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Potential for abuse by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      That is why it is important to lead a zero debt lifestyle. It's soooo American to run wide open throttle to chase that dollar. Take statin drugs (gulpgulpgulpgulpgulp...). Run to executive health (read: death-cheater) clinics every month. Drive Volvos. Dream chasing kills because debt kills.

      Karl Marx was right and that is why those who agree with him are branded as terroris[GUNSHOT!-Bagtagdragdragdrag...]

      Downmodding shall prove the veracity of the above beyond question.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    2. Re:Potential for abuse by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you folks have abandoned passing out cheaply photocopied propaganda fliers, but I doubt Slashdot is going to work much better for you.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  39. The difference between Google and Microsoft by clckwrk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google employees build things like gmail and calendar during the 20% time, MS employee decide to build an employee monitoring system. Talk about having to eat your own dog food. These employees are like the kid that always reminded your teacher on Friday to assign homework.

  40. Old folks home by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1
    Seems to me that this would be pretty useful in retirement homes. A central monitor to watch for "I've fallen, and I can't get up!".

    This would also make it pretty difficult for "those two" to sneak in to the closet for a nooner.

  41. Monkey in the middle? by angus_rg · · Score: 1

    So their now selling dsniff?

  42. employment != ownership by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is s sign that both employers and employees have bought into the hierarchal structure of business a little too much. The employer is hiring you to do a task not purchasing your mind, body, and soul. Yet all to often that's what they are given, so all too often that's what they expect. i.e. How often is a boss who is a complete dick called "sir" or "Mr." and treated with deference? Are Unions the only people left who really understand and act on the fact that the bossman needs the employees more than the employees need him? Yes, "employees" is plural on purpose.
    My employer is quite right to monitor and judge the output and quality of my work, and when applicable to monitor how I effect the public image of the company and the work environment for my fellow employees. None of that includes my heart rate or my general state of health. I'm already being forced to contend with a nanny government, I don't need a nanny work environment as well.

    --
    We are all just people.
    1. Re:employment != ownership by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      In the US Army, the military IDs they issued you say "Property of the US Government". What they didn't say was that it referred to YOU, not the ID.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    2. Re:employment != ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      completely agree, but what choice do we have ? Go on farming and live independent life? But, hell, i can't because now they tax the land. I mean how can we get off the hook have our own sustainable source for living and live independent of the state ?

  43. Can we then enforce an average heartrate at work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People with too low a heartrate are obviously underworked.

  44. Obligatory quote... by Vexler · · Score: 3, Informative

    CAPCOM - GOLD
    - Uh, Thirteen. This is Houston. Jim, we just had a drop out
    on your biomed sensors?

    JIM LOVELL
    - I'm not wearing my biomed sensors, Houston.

    CAPCOM - GOLD
    - Okay, Jim. Copy that.

    DR. CHUCK (FLIGHT SURGEON)
    - Flight. Now I'm losing all three of them!

    GENE KRANTZ (FLIGHT DIRECTOR - WHITE)
    - It's just a little medical mutiny, Doc I'm sure the guys
    are still with us. Let's cut 'em some slack, okay?

  45. Re:Wait a second - with exceptions by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure "chair throwing" will be overlooked. Well, at LEAST from the executive part of Microsoft.

  46. Boredom by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be nice if computers could keep us completely entertained for 8 hours a day in the office?

    I much rather come to work if I knew there was something interesting to do.

    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
  47. Ain't going to happen. by jinxidoru · · Score: 1

    While I do find this alarming, I can't help but thinking, it'll never happen. We love talking about "Big Brother" and predicting the rise of the despotic over-lord megacorporations. Yet, it continues to not happen. Do you know why? It's because we won't let it happen. If I worked for a company and they started doing this sort of thing. I would quit. I would go work for a company that respects me. A lot of people would do that. I refused to sign our employee agreement because I found it to be inappropriate. They didn't like it, but ultimately I am worth more to the company than stupid policies.

    The only place where "Big Brother"-esque techniques have a chance of succeeding is in the lower level employment sector. If you know that you can always get a new employee that's just as good as your current one, then you are more liable to implement unpopular policies. Nevertheless, even in these situations, most companies prefer to treat their employees better. Hell, treating your employees well is cheaper than micro-managing them. It also keeps them from being so pissed they commit corporate espionage or just burn the place down.

    I'm tired of doomsday predictions. The truth is, working conditions will continue doing the same thing they've been doing for decades, improving.

    1. Re:Ain't going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > While I do find this alarming, I can't help but thinking, it'll never happen. We love talking about "Big Brother" and predicting the rise of the despotic over-lord megacorporations. It's because we won't let it happen. If I worked for a company and they started doing this sort of thing. I would quit.

      No, it's because the corporations are more interested in making money than in controlling personal behavior. The only time a corporation is interested in personal behavior is when it can make (or save) a buck off it.

      But to say it'll never happen? And that we won't let it? Look at what we've let happen in the past six years; Post-9/11 America is barely recognizable to a Pre-9/11 oldthinker.

      So I hope you remember saying that when your company is required by law to pay for your health insurance, but as part of the tradeoff to ensure "health care for all working families", your company is allowed to monitor you 24/7. Or maybe universal healthcare will be like universal auto insurance: You buy a policy or you're fined. And if the government's rebating you on that policy, it requires you to wear the gear and check in online once a week. You want a 1984 reference, here's one:

      "Jinxdoru!" screamed the shrewish voice from the universalhealth.gov video chat window. "743428 Jinxdoru Slashdotter! Yes, you! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You're not trying. Lower, please! That's better, comrade. Now stand at ease, the whole squad, and watch me."

      A sudden hot sweat had broken out all over Jinxdoru's body. His face remained completely inscrutable. Never show dismay! Never show resentment! A single flicker of the eyes could give you away. He stood watching while the instructress raised her arms above her head and -- one could not say gracefully, but with remarkable neatness and efficiency -- bent over and tucked the first joint of her fingers under her toes.

      "There, comrades! That's how I want to see you doing it. Watch me again. I'm thirty-nine and I've had four children. Now look." She bent over again. "You see my knees aren't bent. You can all do it if you want to," she added as she straightened herself up. "Anyone under forty-five is perfectly capable of touching his toes. We don't all have the privilege of fighting in the front line, but at least we can all keep fit. Remember our boys on the Iranian front! And the sailors in the Floating Fortresses! Just think what they have to put up with. Now try again. That's better, comrade, that's much better," she added encouragingly as Jinxdoru, with a violent lunge, succeeded in touching his toes with knees unbent, for the first time in several years.

    2. Re:Ain't going to happen. by jinxidoru · · Score: 1

      Once again, if this were to happen to me. I would quit. The money I generate for the company exceeds the money they would save by monitoring my personal behavior.

    3. Re:Ain't going to happen. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The truth is, working conditions will continue doing the same thing they've been doing for decades, improving.
      What, longer working hours, less Over Time paid out, continual erosion of our workers rights (John Howard I'm looking at you, you're standing outside the cricket for a reason) through means such as AWA's (Australian Workplace Agreements). Yeah, working conditions are really improving as compared to 2 or 3 decades ago when if your employer didn't want to pay OT the 8 hour day was enforced.
      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  48. Re:How long before they start to bill workers with by Miseph · · Score: 1

    They won't until the health insurance company gets their greedy little hands on the data. Keep in mind that most companies do not actually provide their own health insurance, opting instead to purchase it through a normal insurance company. Because of the way group health insurance works, it is not in the interest of a company to share this data with the insurer unless the insurer creates one (which would probably be illegal).

    Employee's of health insurance companies, however...

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  49. Are managers, CEOs, "mainstream employees..." by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...and will this software be installed on their computers? To monitor their heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expression and blood pressure?

    After all, "stress and frustration" have more serious consequences if they lead to bad decision-making.

    How about generals? How about the Commander-in-Chief? Isn't their "productivity, physical wellbeing and competence" important?

    Why do I somehow think that it is not going to be installed on any management machines... and that the stated rationales are pretexts?

    1. Re:Are managers, CEOs, "mainstream employees..." by dcollins · · Score: 1

      There was an interesting bit of research in the last "Game Developer" magazine that showed the higher up in a corporate hierarchy someone is (CEO, CFO), the more likely they to spend time playing games in the office, during their work hours.

      The normal rules don't apply for the people at the top.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  50. What's the Baseline? by superdan2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As an endurance athlete with a freakishly low resting heart rate (42 bpm), I can tell you that every time I go to a new doctor they freak right the hell out around the time of my first physical. They tell me that I have an enlarged left ventricle and that I "obviously have heart disease"... Doc? Did you notice that I'm also about 5% body fat, have ripped legs, and a funny-looking tan? Yes. I'm an endurance geek. Yes, this fucks up your baseline.

    When my heart rate is elevated due to office stress, it might jump into the 60s. This is going to screw with your readings.

    Furthermore, isn't this more-or-less just a wireless polygraph where you're looking at data without asking questions? Where the hell is the accuracy in that?

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:What's the Baseline? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      They tell me that I have an enlarged left ventricle and that I "obviously have heart disease"... Doc? Did you notice that I'm also about 5% body fat, have ripped legs, and a funny-looking tan?

      Your doc's more right than you may think. You may not have any problems right now, but you're going to run into trouble with the ol' pump as soon as you can't keep up your workout (for whatever reason - lack of time, other health problems, whatever). At that point, your heart muscle mass will decrease, but your ventricular volume will stay the same or even rise. That is a fairly well-known problem with athletes, which unfortunately no one told you about in detail yet.

    2. Re:What's the Baseline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that 5% body fat is way below the 8-14% that is generally accepted as optimum for human males. As you say though, unfortunately in later years he'll pay for the continuous abuse on his cardiovascular system.

    3. Re:What's the Baseline? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      As an endurance athlete ...

      Well..superdan2k, no will will certainly accuse you of being a rocket scientist...or anyone with even a remotely functioning brain. I guess the gist of this article and movement (that would the movement of America as a Corporate Fascist State, run like a criminal enterprise, in a state of perpetual, artificial war) is completely lost on you....although, I'm sure eveyone is glad you are an endurance athlete....watch out for those squirrel crossings, dood....

    4. Re:What's the Baseline? by superdan2k · · Score: 1

      Actually, I got the point perfectly. My point was that the system is going to be inherently flawed by the wide variety of human data points.

      --
      blog |
  51. Just like cattle by ronaldg · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Part of the process of dehumanizing our species.....why are we doing this to ourselves????

  52. Will they have to stop hiring hot chicks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My heart rate and facial expression change when she walks by. Really, I don't surf pr0n at work.
    Oh, and MS is looking to sell a billion licenses to China. Maybe another 10M to outsourced workers in India.

    Finally, software no one will have any desire to pirate?

  53. The software interfaces with clippy by idiotdevel · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Given your heart rate, looks that you will be throwing a chair soon. Would you like help with that?"

  54. AntiTrust the movie anyone? by cooperdude · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like the movie Antitrust, keeping tabs on everyone.

    1. Re:AntiTrust the movie anyone? by oneTheory · · Score: 1

      i was going to point this out as well except it was such a crappy movie that i feared letting people know i saw it.

  55. I'd love to see the correlation... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sure, physical attributes like heart rate, blood pressure, etc. might be a good indicator of physical "productivity", but I'd sure like to know how or if it correlates to the overall productivity of someone creating intellectual property.

    I am sure you can match biometric data to how many widgets are produced, or even if your driver is likely to be alert (e.g. performing at a higher safety level.) But how can you tell if they are writing good, persuasive prose for that proposal, or cranking out good code or buggy crap that is ultimately negative productivity?

    Collect all the data you want, just don't act on that data alone. You will probably find that different people are productive in different ways. One guy might produce 1/5 of his weekly product each day of the week and another might screw around reading Slashdot and watching YouTube, then produce an equal amount of work coding all night a couple of days a week.

    I think the utility of such monitoring will depend on the task at hand more than finding "perfectly productive" workers.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  56. Re:How long before they start to bill workers with by acvh · · Score: 1

    Actually, many employers use self-funded health plans. These plans are administered by health insurance companies and most employees have no idea that the employer is actually funding the costs. The only time actual insurance kicks in is when a stop-loss figure is hit.

  57. and we will seem at 100% by ktstzo · · Score: 0

    when playing games the system will indicate that we are at full rate are blood preasure will be high, our heart rate too our brain activity would be at peak :D we will work for a long time imagination is more inportant than knowledge @ Albert Eintein

    1. Re:and we will seem at 100% by ktstzo · · Score: 0

      This is to let know the mf that mods the post that hi is a SOAB and no matter what a hell i post, i always get a 0 or a -1 so lets make this one count, thanks to all the pepople that help me get where i am, the guy that anwered my almost first post by adding that i made the firts typo, to my fathers for teaching me to speack so i coul later learn to write (almost), to the internet for leting me learn English and other cool stuff, well i love slash dot, but it seems they dont like me Salute hvrg

  58. Hiring Plan by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    It is clear that this is a plot by MS to cut down on staff. "How can we make our workplace as hostile as humanly possible?"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  59. Ooooh, Let's see the data! by Catalina588 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What a great idea. I cannot wait to see the data Microsoft uses to drive their EPS (Employee Productivity Service)!

    What are the metabolic differences in human beings in front of computer screens showing:

    - Java or C# code with an uninitialized pointer on line 336

    - Porn

    - The last 2 minutes of an eBay auction

    - An e-mail from the CEO forecasting layoffs

    - A memo from the pointy-headed boss about a project you have to do that will add nothing to the sum of human knowledge

    - Sixty minutes after a department meeting with free pizza

    - The stock market ticker this week, or ...

    - Your cube neighbor fighting on the phone with her spouse about the divorce

    - Realizing that your presentation for tomorrow's meeting was not saved before the computer crashed

    How Microsoft ties all of the above together into a useful management tool will be an indicator of how far we will be on the True road to 1984. I am not hopeful.

  60. And I wonder where it will end by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    It is like self fulfilling prophecy. You use hidden cameras, key loggers, hook the employee up to heart monitors and watch their facial expressions, install GPS in their vehicles, tell them what they can't do when they aren't even at work, watch facebook and myspace in case someone slips up and has a little too much fun...and then they can't grasp why they can't find any good, happy employees.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  61. THERE IS A SIMPLE REASON WHY THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Microsoft system that measures employee stress levels will eventually be used to COMPARE employee stress levels with and without Microsoft products on their computers. It would make more sense for MS to patent this technology and bury it than to risk exposing the relationship between crappy software and employee stress.

  62. Crap, they already have this covered-Prior Art! by phorest · · Score: 1

    There's already a similar patent

    Who needs heart rate monitoring when you have one of these
    All MS needs to do is hook their employees up to one of these and monitor the angle and pressure. That'll cut down on porn surfing, inter-office liasons and daydreams of Natalie Portman. That'll increase productivity alone.

    --
    God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  63. I'll just attach it to my cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem ... just hook the sensors up to my cat from 9-5 every day.

    Always relaxed, always happy.

  64. Strap them in by elronxenu · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... and to enable peak physical monitoring, the employees will lie down in a tube filled with fluid. Monitoring connections will be attached at the back of the head. Regular nutrition will be available. *Note special conditions.

    * Special conditions: the employee agrees that any excess electricity generated by the employee in the patented chamber will be available for use by the Company, at no charge.

    1. Re:Strap them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The web browser is a tool of oppression!

      Can there be any other reason that the form send button is labeled "Submit"?

      It's training you ... just like Microsoft and the Dept of Homeland Insecurity ... it's training you.

  65. Ballmer Scale by chord.wav · · Score: 3, Funny

    The system would allow managers to monitor employees' performance by measuring their heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expression and blood pressure.

    I propose the Ballmer scale. All these measurements combined add up much as SpamAssasin rating system.

    0.0. Normal state, even slightly happy.
    0.1. Slightly upset, nothing to worry about.
    0.2. Upset. Something's going on with this guy but he won't make it evident.
    0.4. Angry. He's having a bad day, he'll be fine tomorrow.
    0.6. Furious. Avoid when possible. Do not step in his way.
    0.8. Very furious. Considered dangerous. Contact law enforcement immediately.
    1.0. Berserker. Expect exploding forehead veins and mayor damage to company's furniture.

  66. Redmond Swine! by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another example of the evil empire at work. How can these guys sleep at night? Can you imagine a worse kind of privacy invasion? Bill Gates can give all his money away to charity but he's still going to hell.

  67. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather like this idea. It could certainly be abused, as could any tool, but in the right hands (ostensibly mine) it could allow for huge gains in B2B software UI design. I wish I could make two different layouts of the same app and get actual feedback about which is more intuitive. (.NET coder though I am I tend to prefer mouse-free interfaces, which isn't exactly an Lowest Common Denominator friendly approach)

  68. No one offers assistance like microsoft by blanks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly"."

    I can't believe they actually added that to the patent filing. Just what every coder wants. Every few minutes some big brother style paper clip poping up on the screen asking them if they need assistance.... Or maybe a few streches.

    1. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by Skreems · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, the key is, this isn't intended for use in a work environment. It's something the research branch came up with to help streamline product research and focus groups, matching up people who are having difficulty with the same aspect of a test program, or identifying frustration early so they can ask about the cause and help the user move on instead of becoming increasingly angry. Everyone here trying to apply it to a regular 9 to 5 job setting is obviously going to get the wrong idea.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by locust · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you even read the article? Line One: Microsoft is developing Big Brother-style software capable of remotely monitoring a worker's productivity, physical wellbeing and competence.. Which part of that "isn't intended for use in a work environment"?

      You say:
      "Everyone here trying to apply it to a regular 9 to 5 job setting is obviously going to get the wrong idea."

      But then the article goes on (paragraph 3):
      Technology allowing constant monitoring of workers was previously limited to pilots, firefighters and Nasa astronauts. This is believed to be the first time a company has proposed developing such software for mainstream workplaces.

      we are getting just the right idea... of what kind of a hellish place this kind of system would produce.

    3. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the article? You obviously didn't read the poster's bio:
      http://slashdot.org/~Skreems
    4. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by Skreems · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't understand sarcasm.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    5. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I did read the article, actually. It consists of the writer seeing a patent that could, potentially, be used in scary ways, getting a bunch of outraged quotes from random people who know nothing about the intended use, and writing a shock piece.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    6. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Sorry mate it's not always obvious, especially in forums like this.
      But you yourself seem to be implying that I was not being sarcastic.
      At any rate no offense was intended.

    7. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by jimbojw · · Score: 1

      we are getting just the right idea... of what kind of a hellish place this kind of system would produce.
      An Orwellian one?
    8. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by mpaque · · Score: 1

      "The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly"." Smith! 6079 Smith W.! Yes, you! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You're not trying. Lower, please! That's better, comrade.
    9. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      And, I thought we were seeing another case of:

      Wal-Mart spying on employees via us of former government intelligence gathering employees.

      http://www.google.com/search?q=walmart+cia+securiity&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    10. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technology allowing constant monitoring of workers was previously limited to pilots, firefighters and Nasa astronauts. This is believed to be the first time a company has proposed developing such software for mainstream workplaces. So how can they patent this? Wouldn't prior art or that fact that is obvious prevent the patent from being granted?
    11. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Back in 2001, the Yes Men envisioned a wearable suit that does exactly the same thing. It was only a matter of time until a company actually proposed the idea.

    12. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 1

      we are getting just the right idea... of what kind of a hellish place this kind of system would produce.

      In Soviet Russia, Doctor calls YOU!

      Oh wait, now that can happen in Capitalist America too!
      --
      Consider yourself spoken to.
    13. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There are still managers that think they own you at all hours of the day and in all aspects of your lives. Someone should educate them in the playpens they go to while everyone else is at University, vocational training or on the job. All the readers here know that slavery was considered evil and was one of the main reasons behind the US civil war - these managers need to be taught that as well instead of heading that way.

    14. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can be? Try "will."

      Ever heard of call centers? They're quite common. The machines run the people. And it's not a pretty sight.

    15. Re:No one offers assistance like microsoft by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      *cough* *cough* Yes Men *cough*

  69. The system could also automatically... by JimDaGeek · · Score: 1

    The system could also automatically detect frustration or stress in the user and offer and provide assistance accordingly.
    Huh? How much more should we suffer Clippy?

    Clippy: Hi, I see that you are stressed out. Should I order beer and pizza? Or should I order you a hooker?
    --
    General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
  70. The title of this post is incredibly biased by 1a1n · · Score: 1, Informative

    If this were something invented by Google, it would have a title like "Google saves workers lives". Instead, it gets "Microsoft to spy on employees" which carries connotations of the whole HP deal from a couple of years ago. Titles like this keep /. on the freaky fringe of news organizatons /i

    1. Re:The title of this post is incredibly biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ballmer, is that you? gonna squeal company X is a monopoly because they compete with microshaft?

  71. Ceilingcat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK who tagged this ceilingcat?

    "I can has omniscience and omnipresence?" - Bill G.

  72. Fraudulent Article Header by BSDetector · · Score: 0

    Where did the article say that Microsoft was going to spy on its employees? It talks about a patent only!

  73. Actually, Office 97 by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like you're trying to kill yourself!

    Would you like help?

    * Get help with killing yourself.

    * Just kill yourself without help.

    O Show me this tip every time I start to show signs of optimism.

    1. Re:Actually, Office 97 by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      When this product is focused on "office chair managers", it will be interesting to see the publicly displayed results...

  74. Just Watch European Porn by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're an American (like I am) and they try to use biometrics, just watch some European porn at work. The porn will raise your BP, breathing and alertness measures, and the nuances of a diffrent langauge dialect will raise any thought metrics above a normal baseline, but not so much that the computer thinks you are confused or strugling tounderstand what you're doing.

    On a more serious note, I think this is a bad idea because some people like a co-worker I have get easily `exctied` and panicy over little things, which the system might interpret as incompetence or `vigilence` but is truly neither. On the other hand, when it hits the fan, I'm always pretty level headed, and you don't see me panicing while reading error logs, so it could mark me as `under-performing` or `apathetic` very easily against the departmental baseline.

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
  75. Oh yes by whitespiral · · Score: 0

    - "Congratulations, you've proven to be the most productive member at this unit!" - Of course, I use OpenOffice, Firefox, Ruby on Rails...

  76. How about a timer every 108 minutes? by Wanado · · Score: 1

    I think a countdown timer every 108 minutes would be good. You have to enter the code within the last minute or bad things happen. That'll keep them on their toes.

    --
    Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
  77. Devoid of soul, who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The song for the typical M$ drone:

    "Listen, I'm a corpse, I'm a corpse
    I'm a corpse without soul
    Satan, he's taken, he's taken, he's taken his toll
    And he took it out on me
    I, I'm trapped, I'm trapped, I'm trapped in his spell
    Tonight, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going to Hell, inside his spell
    I was walking down among the graves, I heard a cry, my shadow is gone
    Emptiness in my body, I felt so alone, Small black wings on my naked back
    Now guess what I saw on one of the stones, I saw my soul, in a magical
    haze
    It was all dressed up as a corpse in a wedding dress
    Small black wings on my naked back, now hear my prayer, beggin' for mercy
    I'm living to die, Satan has taken his toll."
    - Mercyful Fate

  78. Monitoring + MS software == High insurance rates? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Given how much my blood pressure skyrockets under the influence of Word, Excel, and Powerpoint, I'm not sure that MS really will want this data due to liability issues. If MS collects data that shows that MS products reduce the health and wellbeing of users, that makes MS more culpable for those products.

    Thing is, I somehow suspect that any such system would likely be running Microsoft-only software, so there would be no means of comparing the effects of MS software vs other software. Thus, it would be impossible to distinguish reduced health due to MS software, and reduced health due to work in general. Then again, "reduced health" suggests some sort of healthier baseline, and if your vital signs are *always* crappy whenever you're working, and your vital signs are only ever monitored while you're working, you might instead just wind up with a terrible health insurance rating. All pretty insidious no matter how it's sliced.

    Cheers, :-\

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  79. The real solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Everyone here is posting how to hack around it or whatever.
    The real solution is to refuse to accept working like this in the first place.
    What are we, men or mice?

  80. I know of companies that would do this by magical_mystery_meat · · Score: 1

    At least one large local company has fired people for being seen using competitors' products in public while wearing a company uniform.

    This company also does random drug testing by the hair method.

    People still line up to work there because of the benefits and perks.

    Fucking sheep.

  81. Clippy for Stress by AetasX · · Score: 0

    "The system could also "automatically detect frustration or stress in the user" and "offer and provide assistance accordingly"." Can you imagine clippy the magical paperclip popping up with his little suggestions when you hit a certain stress load?

  82. Welcome! by MEATLOCKER · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course, we offer a very generous benefits package including two weeks paid vacation, a number of paid holidays, matching 401k, full medical and dental and best of all, we'll let you choose from one of six vibrantly colored catheters that will placed in your ass for sampling throughout your workday. Where do I sign up?

  83. Problem is... by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

    it produces reports 10 years later.

  84. HIPAA and Federal Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are federal laws in the U.S. which prevent a number of people from disclosing medical information to your employer without your written consent, i.e. anything in your medical records (blood pressure, resting heart rate, etc). Even then, employers cannot track or store medical information on a specific employee as this is considered Protected Health Information (PHI).

  85. Sounds like a polygraph to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a polygraph hook up to me ...

    what's next, a come back for chastity belts?

  86. aint right by King+Gabey · · Score: 1

    Downright creepy.

  87. HEALTHCARE by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Right now the only serious privacy protection in the USA is in regards to medical records. Using something like this would give away enough information to not only identify certain kinds of medical problems but it could also be used to profile for potential medical problems.

    Laws will be written to address this; likely after years of abuse. Naturally, when its illegal then it will completely stop and no employer will ever think of downloading the chinese made plug-in from the internet to break these laws...

    Another place of concern is if this information becomes accessible, so employers can look up your score-- like they can with your credit score. Pirate bay like websites could get serious funding doing these sort of things from outside the country.

    The medical problems at least will only exist in the USA, where employment and your health are connected to the bottom line (and don't think for a second that health costs are not deciding factors)

  88. Why Not? Federal Law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "...why not my heart rate?"

    HIPAA establishes regulations for the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) -- anything health related (health records, payment histories) that is linked to a specific employee.

    Federal law states employers cannot do anything regarding your health information without your consent.

    The Americans with Disabilities Act specifies:

            * Employers may not ask job applicants about medical information or require a physical examination prior to offering employment.After employment is offered, an employer can only ask for a medical examination if it is required of all employees holding similar jobs.
            * If you are turned down for work based on the results of a medical examination, the employer must prove that it is physically impossible for you to do the work required.

  89. Gattaca by SombreReptile · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the scene in Gattaca where the main character has a bad heart, but plays back a recording of a healthy heart while on a heart monitor.
    Anybody know where to buy stress-free biometric recordings?

  90. If true by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It would be time to find another job.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  91. I'm hooking mine up to a chihuahua! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    When they check my heart rate and breathing, they'll think I'm the greatest Goddamn worker on the planet!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I'm hooking mine up to a chihuahua! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      ...and then they'll fire you because they'll know you weren't using Windows.

  92. you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6) Federal Laws like the ADA and HIPAA. You don't toy around with employee's personal health information.

  93. No sane employer will touch it by namgge · · Score: 1

    Many employers only manage to comply with the EU Working Time Directive (which sets a limit of an average of 48 hours working week) by claiming that their staff 'choose to work more' of their own free will. So, here is technology that will be able to show that an employer is forcing staff to work in excess of the maximum hours by knowingly exposing them to harmful levels of stress.

    Even my PHB is bright enough to pass on this one.

    namgge

  94. An inherent risk of using a closed source OS by erroneus · · Score: 1

    There are so many ways we can say "I told you so" but this one is a pretty good example of what could possibly go wrong when using a Microsoft or any closed source OS. They can and will hide anything in the code they want. Do you trust Microsoft? Some people are afraid to ask the question in the first place because they know the answer and that they feel there aren't any viable alternatives... and there may not be! It's time to push for change before things get worse. Get vocal with software and hardware vendors about support for Linux, FreeBSD or even MacOS. They will have to act at some point when enough people start asking for it. And you don't have to be a user of an alternative OS at all! Just ask for it. Pave the way for a time in the future to enable you to make the change. It's just a complaint/request and usually doesn't take very long.

  95. Endurance athlete? by Karl0Erik · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Then what are you doing on Slashdot?

  96. A Link to Actual Patent Application by smitth1276 · · Score: 1

    The application itself.

    I think this is being blown out of proportion. There is nothing in it to indicate that they are planning on "spying on employees".

  97. Re:Why Not? Federal Law. by Sonri · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!

  98. I knew there was a reason why - by wsanders · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    - bringing dogs to work was a good idea. Now if we could just get rid of the stepping in poo problem.

    OTOH, if you're being monitored like this you'll need a supply of feces to fling at your zookeepers.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  99. Patent application != developing by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    Everyone should know that making a patent application doesn't mean you are actually developing it. In many companies, submitting a patent gives a developer brownie points with their management, whether the patent is for something that could be used to make money or not. This patent only means that (1) should Microsoft decide to develop such a system then no patent troll can extort them, and (2) should anyone else decide to develop such a system and manage to sell it, then Microsoft can extort money from them.

  100. Horribly Inaccurate by Mallorean509 · · Score: 1

    So Microsoft is now going to have to develop a new blood pressure monitor in order to get this to work considering all home based and smaller blood pressure machines are very innacurate. Unless they are actually going to have a hospital blood pressure unit per employee this will not work. Also, it makes very little sense to me. If I see an attractive co-worker and she comes over and talks to me it's likely my heart rate, b/p, and facial expressions are going to change drastically. There are other umm... ways to increase heart rate and b/p drastically. I wonder what this would look like to those monitering the system.....

  101. MS EULA tracking possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wireless sensors could read "heart rate, galvanic skin response, EMG, brain signals, respiration rate, body temperature, movement facial movements, facial expressions and blood pressure"

    So when you click on Accept on the EULA for a MS product they will know whether you really mean it or not, you get a bit sweaty, your heart rate goes up etc etc....

    Other dialogues that could use this are:

    1. Are you entitled to use this licence key?
    2. Are you over 21?
  102. With Great Power Comes Great Liability by giminy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think an employer really wants this. It may open them to an interesting liability avenue.

    Imaginary scenario:

    John Smith is sitting at his desk, typing away at the report for tomorrow's deadline. His blood pressure and heart rate spike momentarily, then calm down. His left arm becomes slightly numb, but he thinks nothing of this. About 20 minutes later, he drops dead.

    His family turns and sues Megacorp. Megacorp had access to his vital statistics, and should have noticed the warning signs that he was having a heart attack. Had the company acted upon these all-too-obvious signs, it would have saved John's life. The courts rule with Ms. Smith, and award damages of US$40M. Megacorp goes bankrupt.

    Reid.out

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  103. Borg Icon by Juiblex · · Score: 2

    The Bill Gates Borg Icon never made so much sense...

  104. Hmm...I can picture it now... by Salsaman · · Score: 1
    Unions said they fear that employees could be dismissed on the basis of a computer's assessment of their physiological state.

    "Employee number 154372-D, we noticed you were feeling happy last Thursday at 11.37 am. You are clearly not working hard enough, and therefore we have no option but to terminate your employment here."

    1. Re:Hmm...I can picture it now... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      "Employee number 154372-D, we noticed you were feeling happy last Thursday at 11.37 am. You are clearly not working hard enough, and therefore we have no option but to terminate your employment here."

      Be glad we're only terminating your employment.

  105. The actual patent? by Americano · · Score: 1

    The actual patent in question is posted here, I think. This looks like the system they're describing in the article.

    I have to admit, this strikes me as more of a "help" or "usability testing" type of system. The computer thinks you're trying to do X, detects what it believes to be frustration, and checks to see if you need help performing activity X. I don't see much in the patent application saying anything about the users being monitored by managers to see if they're meeting performance goals. I will admit I haven't read the entire patent application, I'm not a lawyer and probably wouldn't understand it fully even if I did read the whole thing... but cursory examination seems to indicate that this patent application is nowhere near the alarming privacy violation that TFS or TFA seem to indicate.

    I know that, here on /., Microsoft is judged guilty of any accusation levelled against them by virtue of their name, but you *might* (just might) want to read the patent in question for yourself before you jump to conclusions.

  106. Insurance companies will love this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insurance companies will push the use of such practices, attempting to reduce their own payouts and offering lower rates to employers who monitor workers' vitals in every way the US Sup. Court will allow.

    The assumption that drug use==bad worker is only superficial--employers will gladly help abrogade our rights when the bottom line is affected, and the assumption that drug use==unsafe drives insurance companies' lower premiums for employers who test. I expect biometric monitoring technology to follow the same route.

  107. Or, possibly, may mean more than you think... by _.-+thimk!+-._ · · Score: 1

    I believe you're rather missing the point that folks are trying to make.

    This would be nothing more than a moderately interesting footnote if we were talking about specialty positions where real-time health monitoring in situ might make sense, based upon unusual job circumstances.

    Unfortunately, that's not what's being discussed.

    The article places this in the context of mainstream -- as in everyday -- jobs.

    Think "generic hapless office worker spied on by Information Retrieval in Brazil ", not "most inconveniently expired engineer from Runaway Train"...

    In terms of everyday jobs, I seriously think it unlikely that anything good would come of this, while I can easily see much that is bad being fairly likely.

  108. Moderation by datadigger · · Score: 1

    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    We do have "Underrated" and "Overrated". Wouldn't that do?
    --
    Aphorisms don't fix code. (Bart Smaalders)
  109. Usability Testing by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just a hyped up version of what we've already heard about? Aren't they just developing these systems for use in usability testing? There was something on /. just a short while back about it - although I'm too lazy to look it up. Maybe the editors have Alzheimer's...

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  110. Bah, biofreedback already done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.askenterprises.net/

    Got a mouse that tries to bio-feedback ya. With the same kind of stated 'goals' of MS's "patent"

  111. Drop-out by zgregoryg · · Score: 0

    A ridiculous idea which will come to fruition, at least in America, due to our lack of freedom. Yes lack of Freedom. Your debt makes you a slave and subject to impositions like the technology proposed.

  112. WOOT by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    I can use software that watches me. For one, I would know that something in this universe actually loves me, and if it knows what kind of help I need, that's more than I know.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  113. Good Daycycle Citizen! by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm...

    So essentially, our jobs are about to become a live-action game of Paranoia?

    Neat! *charges his laser*

    --
    [End Of Line]
  114. Beta Systems Available Now! by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

    Dude, you can get the beta hardware already... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-meter.

    Of course getting ahold of one of these tends to cost alot of money...

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  115. Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But then the article goes on (paragraph 3):
    Technology allowing constant monitoring of workers was previously limited to pilots, firefighters and Nasa astronauts. This is believed to be the first time a company has proposed developing such software for mainstream workplaces."

    Oo! Oo! Oo! No it isn't! Doesn't anyone remember the Yes Men? They did a wearable version of this. Check it out:

    http://www.theyesmen.org/hijinks/tampere/

    The movie will amaze and impress you.

  116. the legitimate interests of a company by alizard · · Score: 1

    in their employees being unimpaired in jobs directly affecting public safety can be met with performance testing.

    A performance test measures "speed of reaction, vigilance and discrimination". It also doesn't care whether an employee is impaired because of illegal drugs, prescription drugs, OTC meds, alcohol, or lack of sleep.

    Neither do I if the impaired person is going to fly a plane I'm going to be a paseanger of.

    Drug testing is about lifestyle control by employers, not about protecting public safety.

  117. No, I don't. by alizard · · Score: 1

    What an employee does off the job is his own business. If his off-the-job behavior impairs his workplace performance, then the employer has the right to do something about it.

    What else do you think comes within an "employer's right to know"? Does the employer have the right to know if a potential employee is gay? Muslim? A Democrat? A non-vegetarian?

    If you believe that you as an employee have no civil rights and no right to personal privacy, you have a right to your opinion.

    Even if rational people think that you're full of horseshit.

    Enjoy your piss tests. . . you do, don't you?

    1. Re:No, I don't. by arminw · · Score: 1

      .......Does the employer have the right to know if a potential employee is gay? Muslim? A Democrat? A non-vegetarian? .....

      You did not read my post very carefully. None of the things you mention above affect job performance in most situations. Probably, a church would not hire a gay or Muslim because such a person would, by definition, have a world view opposed to that of most churches. Some churches might not hire a Democrat :-) ! If one employer feels that a certain drug doesn't affect the job then that employer should be free to hire such a drug using employee. If another employer feels just the opposite, they should be free to reject such a drug user. It should in no case be the government that forces employers either pro or con in that particular issue. Anything that affects a person physiologically, WILL affect their job performance. Even off the job drug use can. Now, an employer may not care about that and therefore should be free to hire a druggie if it is not a safety issue. I certainly would not get on an airplane, if I knew the pilot is a druggie.

      On the other hand, the government SHOULD have a say against job discrimination on grounds that a person cannot change, such as sex, race or national origin etc. Even there, a fire department should not be forced to hire a 90lb woman for a job that might require carrying a 200lb man out of a burning structure. Some common sense and discretion ought to be used in certain situations.

      --
      All theory is gray
  118. I encourage you to apply for an HR by alizard · · Score: 1

    management position in any of the algae to biofuel startups being built up now. Based on your posting, I've got an idea what your idea of "common sense and discretion" is and I'd really like to have you working for one of my competitors, given that I plan to go into the business.

    1. Re:I encourage you to apply for an HR by arminw · · Score: 1

      ......management position in any of the algae to biofuel startups......

      Sorry, but I am a now retired electronics engineer. I don't know much about bio-fuels.

      If I were going into the energy business, I'd try this:

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/21/1627206

      or this:

      http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/09/2310232

      The printed $1/watt solar panels could certainly help with our energy problems.

      Do you really think that "political correctness" in hiring is more important than hiring the right person for a job? If you do, your investors, if any, may be left holding the bag.

      --
      All theory is gray