Slashdot Mirror


MacGyver Film In the Works?

An anonymous reader writes "Looks like everyone's favorite Swiss Army knife-wielding action hero may be making an appearance on the big screen. The original series creator has announced plans are in the works for a MacGyver film. Serious questions abound: Will Richard Dean Anderson reprise the role? Will filming and editing somehow be done only using a paperclip, duct-tape, and TV remote?" And who, if not Anderson, would you want to play MacGyver?

290 comments

  1. Duh! by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

    And who, if not Anderson, would you want to play MacGyver?

    Me!

    (You insensitive clod.)

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:Duh! by unlametheweak · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You took my comment. Now I can't say that without being labeled Redundant. Although it would make sense for the Hollywood types to choose somebody from the Slashdot crowd. From Wikipedia:

      The series revolved around Angus MacGyver (known to his friends as MacGyver or "Mac") who favors brain over brawn in order to solve desperate problems. So yes choosing somebody from the Slashdot crowd would be appropriate. No real acting necessary if they want realism.
    2. Re:Duh! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So yes choosing somebody from the Slashdot crowd would be appropriate.

      Well, with the difference being that MacGyver was knowledgeable and intelligent. The typical Slashdotter only thinks they're knowledgeable and intelligent.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Duh! by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. I suppose there is some amount of truth in that statement (and I take it to be more sarcastic than a real opinion [Hint to the mods not to Troll-label your post]). It really does depend on what you mean by "typical" though. It seems like most registered Slashdotters don't post (or at least not often), so it would be hard to make an accurate claim. There are some here that post quite frequently (almost daily), and those people seem to have intelligence (even if I disagree with their opinions), or at least enough intelligence to realize that they can avoid posting obviously stupid things and get away with it without being at -1 Karma. So I would argue that the regular poster are more intelligent than your average human (they have learned how to argue and communicate with a more educated and yes at times hostile crowd). I know I have increased my communication skills since I was here.

      Best regards,

      UTW

    4. Re:Duh! by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The typical Slashdotter only thinks they're knowledgeable and intelligent.

      Looking at the list of "MacGyverisms",
      he was often just as misguided.

      I often wished some of his trickery would backfire uproariously. A self-spoof once in awhile can be fun. With the added excitement that there's no foregone conclusion that the trick will work.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    5. Re:Duh! by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So yes choosing somebody from the Slashdot crowd would be appropriate.

      Well, with the difference being that MacGyver was knowledgeable and intelligent. The typical Slashdotter only thinks they're knowledgeable and intelligent.

      I would have modded you "Insightful" - but then I realized that (being a "typical Slashdotter") you are referring to me as well - and I know I think I'm knowledgeable and intelligent!!! ;-)

    6. Re:Duh! by Eudial · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And who, if not Anderson, would you want to play MacGyver?

      Me!

        (You insensitive clod.) You are aware that the role calls for a mullet, no? It's all in the mullet. You can't be MacGyver without it.
      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    7. Re:Duh! by unlametheweak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's ironic. As of this point in space-time the GP does have an Insightful moderation. It is also ironic that I very often get Insightful ratings (and appropriately IMHO) even though I don't (and never did) consider myself (very) knowledgeable and intelligent. It's a matter of degree.

      I have always found that there is so much to know (on any one topic, much less IT itself which is a HUGE matter which most amateurs and 'civilians' take for granted). I have for example spent lots of time and money formally studying 'IT' and everyday I am still learning something knew. I don't consider myself an expert and will never claim to be (on Slashdot or on my resumes). Claiming to be "knowledgeable and intelligent" is (to me) arrogance. As I've stated, it is a matter of degree and perspective.

    8. Re:Duh! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Sylvester Stallone, you're already ruining... remaking...Death Wish.

    9. Re:Duh! by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Everybody who posts in Slashdot and complains about Slashdot seems to be a regular reader of Slashdot (and yes a poster and complainer about Slashdot).

      Well if you don't like it here...
      Time better spent elsewhere.

    10. Re:Duh! by DaEmEoNd · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh I know Mark Hamill!! =D

      --
      The begining of the end...
    11. Re:Duh! by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod... you beat me to the mullet. heheh I was watching the DVDs a while back, first time in years, and it suddenly hit me, as well as the disbelief that it had not already:

      MacGyver had a mullet!!

      But, of course, if anyone could pull it off, it would be MacGyver. Imagine SG-1 if Richard sported the MacGyver trademark. BOY HOWDY!

    12. Re:Duh! by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      So some Slashdot moderator with a callous sense of humour rated my post redundant. Go figure!

      In some ways I like the perverse sense of humour, in other ways I hope the meta-moderators damn you to oblivion.

    13. Re:Duh! by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I say we go with Neil Patrick Harris. He would lack some of Richard Dean Anderson's charm, but would make up for it because, he's NPH!

    14. Re:Duh! by Daffy+Duck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not his choice, really. According to Screen Actors' Guild rules, he can't use the exact same name as another actor, and Richard Anderson (who played Oscar Goldman on The Six Million Dollar Man) got there first.

    15. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well true, one can't know everything about most topics that have any depth, but if you know a lot relative to the majority of people working full-time in a particular area (say 80%) I'd argue this at least makes you "knowledgeable" in that area. If you know more than 97% of those people I'd say you are at least approaching "expert" status in that area. To me, the labels "expert" and "knowledgeable" are relative, it depends how one ranks amongst their peers. The specific percentile ranks I mentioned could be debated.

      I do not equate "expert" to mean "knows everything" on a topic. The definition of an expert is "one with the special skill or knowledge representing mastery of a particular subject". That is certainly an attainable status. "Knowing everything" is not. I suppose if someone just listed "Knowledge level:Expert." as a bullet-point on their resume, I'd consider that arrogance, if someone listed "Microsoft T-SQL expert", I'd consider that a possibility.

      "Intelligence" has more to do with the ability to learn new things and apply them, it is independent of knowledge level (a child that hasn't learned much yet can be intelligent). Again this can be true.

      Having read a few resumes and done some interviews, I know better than to just take as fact what is written on a resume. It is usually just a starting point for asking interview questions. Claiming to be an expert on something will most likely yield questions I'd expect an expert to answer or at least speculate on coherently.

      Also since I think these terms apply relative to one's peers, one cannot honestly apply these terms to themselves without having a significant number of their peers make statements to that effect at one time or another.

    16. Re:Duh! by asackett · · Score: 1

      Some slashdotters know that "the typical Slashdotter" is singular, while "they" is plural. Maybe they're the knowledgeable, intelligent ones. :-)

      --

      Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

    17. Re:Duh! by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The typical Slashdotter only thinks they're knowledgeable and intelligent.

      But... but......but I have Excellent Karma!?!
      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    18. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, besides we're too fat for the role. How could we then get in ventilation conducts and narrow spaces without getting stuck?

    19. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jason Lee from My Name is Earl (etc.)

      He'd be pretty funny AND he could use LRH tech to boot!

      (that was a bit rude, wasn't it?)

    20. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He would come up with a fart-o-matic?

    21. Re:Duh! by Listen+Up · · Score: 1, Troll

      I don't consider myself an expert and will never claim to be (on Slashdot or on my resumes). Claiming to be "knowledgeable and intelligent" is (to me) arrogance. As I've stated, it is a matter of degree and perspective.

      Claiming to be knowledgeable and intelligent is arrogant? What are you talking about?

      Here are some definitions for you:
      Knowledge
      Knowledgable
      Intelligent

      which has nothing to do with

      Arrogance

      Reading your entire post, it is clear you are insecure and trying to project your own inadequacies onto others.

      Your current +4 Insightful rating is highly inaccurate.

    22. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have for example spent lots of time and money formally studying 'IT' and everyday I am still learning something knew. like the proper use of English? ;o)
    23. Re:Duh! by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 2

      C'mon...you can't have a MacGuyver who is *not* Richard Dean Anderson. He's just that awesome.

      ~Jarik

    24. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean we can call him Dick Dean for short?

    25. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is truly great news. I hope Anderson stars in the film. It just wouldn't be the same without him.

    26. Re:Duh! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Don't give up hope. If this movie gets the greenlight, there's a good chance it will be a comedy spoof of the series featuring Owen Wilson as MacGyver and Ben Stiller as Murdoc, MacGyver's main nemesis. I don't know who Vince Vaughn will play.

    27. Re:Duh! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So yes choosing somebody from the Slashdot crowd would be appropriate.

      I think clevernickname could do a pretty good job in the role.

    28. Re:Duh! by lysdexia · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure I agree: One day I actually looked over my old posts and discovered that I'm actually kind of a know-it-all douchebag possessed of very stale sense of humour. ( Look it up yourself! )

      Luckily, I'm very very pretty.

    29. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is truly great news. I hope Anderson stars in the film. It just wouldn't be the same without him. Yeah; him and an old(er) short fat bald white guy (i.e. Dana Elcar in the original and Don Davis in SG1) - there's just GOTTA be something reverse-Freudian in that... (and Teal'c was bald too)

      The original shows stopped being good when they killed the gambits that preceeded the opening theme.
    30. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, great - a gay MacGyver AND a talentless Murdoc. Don't you want people to WATCH this movie?

    31. Re:Duh! by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Other slashdotters know there is a severe lack of a gender-neutral singular pronoun in the English language, and "they" works fine for the task. All that needs to be done is make people stop thinking it's wrong.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    32. Re:Duh! by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Must... resist... rickrolling...

      No mention of the name MacGyver, but here's RDA without the mullet.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    33. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You deserve a +4 Troll rating for that piece of delicious irony.

    34. Re:Duh! by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Who is this "Anderson" fellow? Everybody knows it MacGyver who plays the of Jack O'Neill role in Stargate SG-1. :p

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    35. Re:Duh! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I want Richard Dean Anderson to poke his eye out with a drinking straw, a rubber band, and a paper clip; but it's not going to happen. It would be a poor business proposition to set a MacGyver movie in the proper context of the show; so the movie would either become high-tech like Mission: Impossible, or a genre spoof like Starsky & Hutch. *shudder*

    36. Re:Duh! by Tisha_AH · · Score: 1

      How about Ashton Kutcher, playing the role as Michael Kelso from "That 70's Show".

      It would make the Rube Goldberg-esque inventions even more improbable.

      Sure he shacks up with Demi, that just shows he has good taste.

      You've been Punked!

      --
      Tisha Hayes
    37. Re:Duh! by Mercano · · Score: 1

      The typical Slashdotter only thinks they're knowledgeable and intelligent. But... but......but I have Excellent Karma!?! Then perhaps when you die you'll be reincarnated as MacGyver.
      --
      #include <signature.h>
    38. Re:Duh! by jtev · · Score: 1

      Yes, but "HE" is gramatically correct, not "they". "It" would work, except that in english, "it" only refers to objects that are not people. The use of "he" for the gender neutral pronoun has faded in recent decades, because of feminism, however it is still the gramatically correct form. (Please forgive any spelling errors, I'm posting from work, and don't have firefox to spell check for me.)

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    39. Re:Duh! by hardburn · · Score: 1

      IMHO, feminists reject that choice for good reasons (and I'm not one who normally agrees with most feminist rhetoric). There have been attempts to invent a new pronoun, like "thir", but it's unlikely that they'll take hold for speakers at large (how long have feminists tried to get "Ms" to work?). The path of least resistance is to accept "they" for this use and be done with it.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    40. Re:Duh! by Lectoid · · Score: 1
      I don't know who Vince Vaughn will play.

      MacGyver's boss, Pete Thorton.

      --
      Is it just me, or do you hate it when people say "Is it just me..."?
    41. Re:Duh! by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Feminism or not, she is and always has been grammatically correct, even for the gender neutral case, even though he has traditionally been used for it (it does feel weird reading she as gender neutral when not used to it, however). 'It' works in English for people provided they are deformed enough to be gender indistinguishable, hermaphroditic, monsters in some way (Frankenstein or zombies for instance) or (sometimes) transsexuals. He/she or she/he or [s]he is grammatically correct and can be used if you want to avoid bias, but are not often used to avoid verbosity and/or confusion.

    42. Re:Duh! by Hellpop · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, Richard Anderson just happened to be his father.

      --
      "People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything."
    43. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call "bullshit!". Now you owe me a zillion dollars.

    44. Re:Duh! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      It's General Jack O'Neill to you! ;-)

      Anyway - I think it would be better with someone a bit younger - and with some style. Why not Ewan McGregor?

      Colin Ferguson may also do fine!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    45. Re:Duh! by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, Richard Anderson just happened to be his father. Which is little-known, mainly because it's false. http://www.rdanderson.com/bio/bio.htm
    46. Re:Duh! by jtev · · Score: 1

      She is also a valid choice, and in fact the one used by Wizards of the Coast for the Dungeons & Dragons roleplaying game. It is also often used for items in english that do not have a sex, I do not say gender, because if you are calling the item he or she, you are declaring it to have such a gender, such as cars, ships, and other vehicles, however that are considered to have "personality". My point was not the specific pronoun to use, but rather that a singular personal pronoun should be used. Unless of course, they encompases more than one person, in which case, it does become the correct pronoun, regardless of if that more than one person is of one gender or of multiple genders.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    47. Re:Duh! by Hellpop · · Score: 1

      Well, Thanks for correcting me. I remember hearing that a long, long time ago. Like Pre-web days. At least I was still right about Dean Paul Martin, though!

      --
      "People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything."
  2. Must be the right person by mikesd81 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a supposed to be a show a while back called Young MacGyver. I can't recall the actor, but the producers at least had someone cast. They can't run MacGyver by casting some moron like Ben Stiller or some other half bit comedian. AND definitely not Tom Cruise. Matt Damon maybe? Young Mac write up on imdb.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:Must be the right person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't run MacGyver by casting some moron like Ben Stiller or some other half bit comedian. AND definitely not Tom Cruise. Matt Damon maybe? Assuming you mean "ruin".. MacGyver's not The Sopranos. It ain't art and there isn't much by the way of greatness to ruin, it was a cheeseball show and outside of Patty and Selma there's not a huge fan base. It would probably do harm to Tom Cruise or Matt Damon's career to play a serious MacGyver.

      You probably had it right with Ben Stiller, because odds are this movie's going to be very tongue-in-cheek.
    2. Re:Must be the right person by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you said it right there. It's HOLLYWOOD. Tom Cruise it is. He's looking for a blockbuster action role to follow up his international acclaim with Lions for Lambs and Valkyrie. What better than MacGyver? He was born for it.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Must be the right person by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damon would probably be good, except for one question...

      How will he look in a mullet?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Must be the right person by wellingj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think Hugh Jackman would be a better fit.

    5. Re:Must be the right person by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Matt Damon did excellent work in the espionage/underhanded sort of films like the Bourne Trilogy and the Oceans Trilogy. He also can pull off a good sense of humor as evidenced in the Ocean films and his cameo in Eurotrip (his rendition of the band's vocalist is STILL some of the funniest shit I've ever seen). He would make an excellent MacGyver.

      The real question here is can he pull off a mullet?

    6. Re:Must be the right person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      Oh good googley grief! Why don't you just say it, if you where female you would have Jackman's baby, but as it is you would be perficly happy with him unloading his manhood on your face.

      Say it... You know you want it.

    7. Re:Must be the right person by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Tom Cruise is ruining his career. Even if MI:4 comes out, and Paramount wants to revive the M:I series, it won't be w/ Cruise. I'm not sure anyone would cast him for this part.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    8. Re:Must be the right person by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you stapled it on, I'm pretty sure that he wouldn't be able to pull off the mullet.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Must be the right person by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      If they decide to go with a "Reimagined MacGuyver", they should consider getting Michael Welch to play him.

      If RDA isn't able to play the role, they should at least get his clone. ;-)

    10. Re:Must be the right person by gryfen · · Score: 1

      Matt Daemon's character in the Bourne Trilogy *absolutely* could pull off a stapled-on mullet. You'd have to integrate it at the cellular level, and then make it a requisite for him staying incognito while passing through a checkpoint on-alert for his presence.

    11. Re:Must be the right person by JayJay.br · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know you are reading Slashdot when somebody says Matt "Daemon" and nobody seems to have a problem with that.

  3. will smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep

  4. Murdoch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Harrison Ford can do another Indiana Jones, RDA can do another MacGyver.

    They need to bring back Murdoch as well and have it end in a fiery death sequence where Murdoch is shot 11 times, burned, drowned, run over by a semi, yet still lives on to battle Mac in a sequel!

    1. Re:Murdoch! by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative

      RDA, up until about four years ago, was on Stargate SG-1, a show that required more action work than MacGyver ever did. He was running around big fields and alien hallways firing guns at things, instead of messing around with chemicals in a closet.

      Unless something has happened to him since then (Wasn't he just in the second SG-1 direct-to-video film?), he clearly can do the role of MacGyver.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Murdoch! by maxume · · Score: 1

      From his appearances on Atlantis it is apparent that he has been eating quite a lot of lunch since he left Stargate.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Murdoch! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Harrison Ford didn't do another Indiana Jones. His 30-year-old stunt double and the special effects guys did another Indiana Jones. He just had to show up periodically and say some dialogue will standing still (lest he break his hip).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Murdoch! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      They need to bring back Murdoch as well and have it end in a fiery death sequence where Murdoch is shot 11 times, burned, drowned, run over by a semi, yet still lives on to battle Mac in a sequel! Not to be a spoiler but they never killed Murdoch in the fiery death sequence. It was actually some other guy wearing a mask to make him look like Murdoch.
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  5. Are You Kidding? by Skeetskeetskeet · · Score: 3, Informative

    If Harrison Ford can reprise Indy Jones at the age of 113 then dammit Richard Dean Anderson can play MacGyver!!!

    --
    Yeah, my karma sucks....but so do the mods.
  6. Alternate Cast by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rename the movie to MacGyver Brothers, and performed by Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage. Would love to see the extra-dvd content where they show how and where the movie they just acted was wrong.

    1. Re:Alternate Cast by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to the legends, everything on MacGuyver could have been done, so why not have them show how it was right? In fact, have them make a mythbusters proving/disproving the movie anyway; it'll be a big boost to publicity for both shows.

    2. Re:Alternate Cast by rkcallaghan · · Score: 4, Informative
      moderratorrater wrote:

      According to the legends, everything on MacGuyver could have been done, so why not have them show how it was right? In fact, have [Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage] make a mythbusters proving/disproving the movie anyway; it'll be a big boost to publicity for both shows. The Mythbusters have already done a MacGyver episode. Several of the myths were busted, though many of them did have an element of truth to them, they could not be performed nearly so bare bones as Mac did.

      ~Rebecca
    3. Re:Alternate Cast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You beat me to it! I was going to suggest Adam Savage too. Jamie is smart - but I don't think he could act the part. At the very least, those guys should be advisors - they run a special effects house for the movie business anyway - but their advice on what is plausible and what would be laughably stupid would help to ground the series in the reality the original sadly lacked.

    4. Re:Alternate Cast by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      They probably could work them into the film as extras in the background of some scene, it might be good for a bit of comic relief for those who can spot the reference.

    5. Re:Alternate Cast by XNormal · · Score: 1

      This is not such a bad idea, actually.

      Have them vet any mcgyverisms in the movie and give them some cameo roles.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  7. Whatever they decide by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope they don't try to update the MacGuyver idea for the 21st century.
    Keep that 80's feel, with the big hair and aviator glasses.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Whatever they decide by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, those are coming back, I just know it ...

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    2. Re:Whatever they decide by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, those are coming back, I just know it ... I suppose anything's possible. I mean, chicks like those bug-eyed clown sunglasses now*, so mullets and aviator shades could always make a comeback.

      * Who knows, maybe those actually are somehow cool, and I'm just getting old :P
    3. Re:Whatever they decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows, maybe those actually are somehow cool, and I'm just getting old
      No, they're just tacky. Unless you're trying to play I'm-so-tacky-I'm-cool, they do, in fact, make you look like a clown.
    4. Re:Whatever they decide by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      They wear 'em for a reason: large glasses play tricks with your eyes to make their bodies appear smaller in proportion to their head(and smaller in general).
      In other words, big glasses make 'em appear bobbleheaded and doll-like.
      Yet another atrocious fashion trend, almost as bad as their stuffing their jean-legs into their UGG boots, causing their legs to look all fat :P

    5. Re:Whatever they decide by upto0013 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you live in or have been to one of these "high-fashion" midwest cities, but I see at least two fashion mullets ever day ... in Minneapolis.

    6. Re:Whatever they decide by Gryle · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mullets and aviator shades could always make a comeback
      Mullets can't make a comeback since they never went out of style to begin with.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    7. Re:Whatever they decide by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I find it quite funny that this man has managed to get himself modded informative with no information, just a hopeful statement and a stereotype from the 80s. This man must be a MacGuyver fan, hardcore!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Whatever they decide by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Actually, mullets are very popular for women here in Sweden. It's like smashing a stained glass window, I say.

    9. Re:Whatever they decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aviators are "cool" again, if you don't believe me check your local college campus and frat districts.

      And yes, they still make you look like a douche. Some things never change.

    10. Re:Whatever they decide by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      Dude, those are coming back, I just know it ... Dude, they're already back.
    11. Re:Whatever they decide by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Mullets can't make a comeback since they never went out of style to begin with. They never went out of style?
      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    12. Re:Whatever they decide by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      chicks like those bug-eyed clown sunglasses now It's because they cover up a good portion of their faces. Better to look ridiculous and potentially cute than just plain ugly.
      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    13. Re:Whatever they decide by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's right. You have to be [i]in[/i] style before you can go [i]out[/i] of style.

    14. Re:Whatever they decide by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I find it quite funny that this man has managed to get himself modded informative with no information, just a hopeful statement and a stereotype from the 80s. This man must be a MacGuyver fan, hardcore! I whipped together a mind ray using an old wifi access point, a shoelace, the arm off a broken pair of glasses and an orange for the power source... all to influence those with mod points.

      Does that answer your question?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:Whatever they decide by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Of course, you would need your Marty McFly life-preserver 80s puffy jacket and spandex tight Levi's jeans to complete the look.

    16. Re:Whatever they decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you haven not been on a college campus for the last 2 years? Or seen a 20something year old lady walking around... Oversized/Aviator glasses are everywhere!

    17. Re:Whatever they decide by operagost · · Score: 1

      McFly wore Calvin Kleins, you insensitive clod!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Whatever they decide by tomthegeek · · Score: 1

      I think the big glasses thing started off because when you saw celebrities shopping they were always wearing big glasses in an attempt to blend in with the general public. So girls wearing big glasses are trying to look famous.

  8. If they changed starbuck, they can change McG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this day and age, I'd be surprised if they didn't cast a woman on the role.

    Imagine the PR value. Great role model for girls. Oh no, they are messing with my childhood again. She wears the pants in the inevitable romantic side plot. etc.

    If they do, I hope they give the role to Amanda Tapping.

  9. MacGyver feels dated by tangent3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've had the chance to watch a couple of MacGyver episodes recently and they feel dated.
    At the same time, the Bourne series comes to my mind as a modern version of MacGyver.
    So... Matt Damon as MacGyver?

    1. Re:MacGyver feels dated by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean about feeling dated. I watched an episode recently, and kept on thinking, Why doesn't he just grab his cell phone?

    2. Re:MacGyver feels dated by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Because it's not 24?

      OTOH, Kiefer Sutherland might do well in the role, but I'd prefer to just bring RDA back. Strictly speaking, the plot doesn't require a lot of fast-moving action. Stargate was probably more stunt-intensive than MacGyver ever was.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:MacGyver feels dated by cgdiaz · · Score: 1

      Jack Bauer would own it!

    4. Re:MacGyver feels dated by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they would definitely bring it up to date with lots of bling, Matrix-sytle special effects (paperclip-time?), and a hip (hop), young cast. It's the formula for making a buck by selling the soul of an old series. They'd give Richard a cameo to keep the geezers from going postal.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    5. Re:MacGyver feels dated by DannyO152 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good choice. Ryan Reynolds?

    6. Re:MacGyver feels dated by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Apparently he was loaded
      (three mini-sketches after the car ad)

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    7. Re:MacGyver feels dated by topologicalanomaly47 · · Score: 1

      that only means that you are watching the surface and miss the meaning

    8. Re:MacGyver feels dated by patrixmyth · · Score: 1

      I agree with the dated comment. I think you'd have to go with a spoof. The obvious choices then would be Owen Wilson as MacGyver and Ben Stiller as Murdoc, creating sort of a bizarro Starsky and Hutch sequel. Maybe Jackie Chan in a cameo as Pete Thornton.

      --
      "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
    9. Re:MacGyver feels dated by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Matt Damon just doesn't look the part. He's just too much of a baby face. MacGyver's more "hunky" in the vein of David Hastlehoff. That's why I'd like to see Nathan Fillion, because I think he'd match the overall presentation of the part, but bring some quirkiness to a roll that's always struck me as a little flat.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  10. Second Biggest Question: by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    Are they going to keep the voiceovers that 'explain' how Mac manages to do those incredibly unlikely things while he's puttering around with baling wire, twine and the trap-of-the-minute?

    1. Re:Second Biggest Question: by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Haha, yeah right. If anything, the sequel will be dumbed down in the interest of "national security".

      Nobody wants any lawsuits resulting from copycat stunts gone bad...and nobody wants to teach people how to do terroristy things
      like this or this.

    2. Re:Second Biggest Question: by Taelron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually there were numerous specials talking about how they did all the stuff in the show. Each of the "projects" were created and tried out first by Engineering College students from one of the Southern California Colleges (dont remember which one). It of it was real science... Though they always left out one or two steps in the show so you couldnt exactly duplicate it. Like the time he made a bomb by filing down the magnesium frame of a racing bike...

      Likewise they will do the same thing again or use hollywood science... I'd prefer based of reality with a step or two omitted instead of mixing a soda with toothpaste to make a door lock eating agent. lol

    3. Re:Second Biggest Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It wasn't a bomb. He filed down the bike and used the magnesium filings with rust to make thermite to gas axe open the back of an armoured car so the bad guys wouldn't use explosives to open it killing the guard inside.

      He got it open. They killed the guard anyway.

      It is so sad I remember all this :(

    4. Re:Second Biggest Question: by fbjon · · Score: 1

      What explanatory voiceovers? I can't remember anything like that.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:Second Biggest Question: by FeebleOldMan · · Score: 1

      They killed the guard anyway.

      Thanks for spoiling it for me, PAL! >:(

      No.. wait..

    6. Re:Second Biggest Question: by jjsoh · · Score: 1

      What explanatory voiceovers? I can't remember anything like that. MacGyver used to narrate with explanations. Maybe this sample clip will jog your memory.
    7. Re:Second Biggest Question: by Pizentios · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a Bomb he made, it was a cutting torch so that he could cut through a door on an armored van, saving the life of the guard inside of the van rather then letting the bad guys blow him up when they blew the door off.

      --
      -Pizentios
  11. Someone is having writer's block by nanospook · · Score: 1

    Just another example of the lack of imagination from a script writer. Hey, let's create a show about doctors! No wait! How about cops! Uhhhh, got too many of those? Well... fashion? Talent? Housewives? Bummer, all taken? *has another scotch* Oh I know, let's do something that's been done before! Man, I'm good! It sucks.. promote original for God's sake!

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    1. Re:Someone is having writer's block by deft · · Score: 1


      You do realize we've all heard these complaints before, right?

      but seriously, if you're going to complain about people doing stories on interesting professions, lives, etc, then you're in for a shitty entertainment experience going forward.

      "Just another example of the lack of imagination from a script writer. Hey, let's create a show about doctors! No wait! How about cops! Uhhhh, got too many of those? Well... fashion? Talent? Housewives? Bummer, all taken? *has another scotch* Oh I know, let's do something that's been done before! Man, I'm good! It sucks.. promote original for God's sake!"

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:Someone is having writer's block by tloh · · Score: 1

      You know, I've never understood why they didn't take the idea behind MacGyver and run with it in the same way you've mentioned those show about all those other professionals. How come there has never been a show about engineers? As of late, CSI has been exceptional and unique in portraying folks trained in science who applying it in exciting ways to uncover mysteries and provide insights. But imagine telling the story of how "Spirit" and "Opportunity" were designed and following the drama of the Mars Exploration Rover from testing, construction, launch, en route, landing, and finally exploration of the red planet. There is a story worth telling behind amazingly beautiful pictures like this that are so familiar and identifiable by at the same time so utterly alien.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    3. Re:Someone is having writer's block by Paxtez · · Score: 1

      You're blaming the wrong people, the writers only write what they are told to by the producers. They are not responsible for the lack of imagination in movies/TV/video games/music these days.

      But producers are only doing their job, and predict what people are going to like and pay for. They are not responsible for the lack of imagination in movies/TV/video games/music these days.

      There is a enough 'original' out there, but people don't do original, people like safe. So instead of getting Primer/Firefly/Psychonauts/Too Many to List; we are stuck with Star Trek 11/Bionic Woman/Madden++;/Everything Else.

    4. Re:Someone is having writer's block by Yetihehe · · Score: 5, Funny
      Top posting.

      What?

      Do you know what sucks on usenet?
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    5. Re:Someone is having writer's block by friedo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Check out the HBO series From the Earth to the Moon. My favorite episode is the one that's told from the perspective of the boss engineer at Grumman when they were designing the LEM.

    6. Re:Someone is having writer's block by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of Discovery channel? Or Science Channel? Or History/History International channels?

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    7. Re:Someone is having writer's block by servognome · · Score: 1

      I always thought of Firefly as the A-team in spaaaace.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    8. Re:Someone is having writer's block by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      It's the episode called "Spider". One of my favorites of the bunch.

      --
      this is my sig
    9. Re:Someone is having writer's block by tloh · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have heard of those channels. But unless you have access to some strange new premium service, not once has any of those channels ever taken a stab at a drama series. In the same way, "From Earth to the Moon" was very much based on the history Apollo missions. It really wouldn't have worked for the mini-series had the writers taken too much liberties with historic facts. How about creating something different where competent writers are give free reigns to truly explore new territory? The closest realization of what I had in mind comes from the BBC when they did a docu-fiction called "Space Odyssey: Voyage to the Planets" about what it would be like to the the solar system "Grand Tour" voyager-style but with a manned spacecraft. http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2004/10_october/13/space.shtml I remembered this show very well because they used the fictional nature of the presentation to tackle some serious issues such as, risk management, astronaut safety vs. scientific objectives, death of a crew member far from home, etc. that the current state of space exploration has not yet dealt with. It was a fun and exciting show and I wish there were more like it.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    10. Re:Someone is having writer's block by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in using drama shows, no matter how much science is used, for teaching. There are documentaries that are entertaining for younger children that are better than shows that may take literary license for a drama show.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    11. Re:Someone is having writer's block by tloh · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in using drama shows....

      Well gosh, all the major broadcasters would simply *die* if you're not happy. Luckily they all stay in business by staying away from shows like dramas that you don't believe in. Honestly what does that have to do with the subject at hand? I was trying to say something about the subject matter of what is on TV and character portrayal of a particular profession. If you're offended by the presentation style, you're missing the point of my comment. If I recall correctly, we're talking about how the application of science/technology is featured on the screen and the creativity of writers in the context of MacGyver.

      In all seriousness, I think you might be posting to this thread by mistake. Might your perspective be more relevant in the earlier submitted story " Science Documentaries for Youngsters?" I mean, unless you wish to explain yourself further, I don't know how many people here would agree that MacGyver has *that* much educational value for young children. I remember reading somewhere that the show runners always intentionally leave out a critical component in all of MacGyver's creative solutions exactly because they didn't want kids to successfully copy what they see and hurt someone or something.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    12. Re:Someone is having writer's block by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Well MacGuyver's educational value, for me at least. Was showing that there are always a solution to a problem. Every time I think up a non direct solution to a problem because I don't have the proper tools on hand I give a nod to the creators of MacGuyver and RDA specifically. Although I prefer my leatherman to my swiss army knife, but then I carry both.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    13. Re:Someone is having writer's block by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1
      And it was just a talking Paper Clip who helped me do it!

      Top posting.

      What?

      Do you know what sucks on usenet?
      --
      sig? Oh, that sig...
    14. Re:Someone is having writer's block by tloh · · Score: 1

      Well MacGuyver's educational value, for me at least. Was showing that there are always a solution to a problem. Every time I think up a non direct solution to a problem because I don't have the proper tools on hand I give a nod to the creators of MacGuyver and RDA specifically. I applaud you for deriving a positive experience out of the show. That is something we both share. However, it seems to me that protagonists who come up with solutions, often creative ones, to encountered problems are essentially the staples of every drama show featuring any kind of trained professionals be they cops, soldiers, lawyers or doctors. MacGuyver was not unique in that regard as a resourceful character who thinks outside of the box. What made him special for me was that he was able to succeed with what at first glance seem to be such poverty of resources. To contrast his fictional situations with other shows of the period: *Captain Picard and the crew of the enterprise would always rely on some cool fictional future technology to help resolve their issues. *Jim Phelps and the mission:impossible gang often uses incredible spy tools of misdirection that no one except spies can access. But as the joke goes, MacGuyver solves the same problem with duct tape, paper clips, and tube socks. Occasionally, his antics pushes the bounds of believability - which is okay for a fictional drama series. But it *IS* a fictional drama series - not a documentary - and as such is is entertaining and enjoyable in it's own right. Which brings me the my original point: that I wished there were more shows like it.
      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  12. 80's Mac, new actor by billlava · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I definitely agree that it should feel like the old '80s MacGyver. If they tried to make it modern and hip it would just be trash, but it would still make money just the same. As for who should play Mac... The one modern-day equivalent we've got - Keefer Sutherland!

    1. Re:80's Mac, new actor by eebra82 · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree that it should feel like the old '80s MacGyver. You're basically saying that you don't want to see McGyver hacking Pentagon with a paper clip.
  13. Why sombody else than Anderson? by 32771 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He may look a bit grey now but that MacGyver movie could be done like Space Cowboys with Clint Eastwood.

    Us eighties kids have become older too you know. I just discovered a grey hair a week ago, damn was I shocked.

    --
    Je me souviens.
    1. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by rob1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, he's not even 60 yet. His shelf life for this role is a little longer than some other traditional action heroes because it depends on him looking smart, rather than looking tough. If they're gonna do this within the next 3-5 years, get Anderson.

    2. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A gray hair? Um, OK. I'm about the same age but I had gray hairs when in my teens. Everybody gets an odd gray hair at pretty much any age. One hair does not make one graying.

    3. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Indeed, he's not even 60 yet. His shelf life for this role is a little longer than some other traditional action heroes because it depends on him looking smart, rather than looking tough. If they're gonna do this within the next 3-5 years, get Anderson.

      He left Stargate SG-1 to retire (though he's been back a few times). Part of the reason he left is one of his knees is bad enough that he was having trouble performing simple stunts like jumping into a cockpit.

    4. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      I just discovered a grey hair a week ago, damn was I shocked.
      You can never find a toothpick when you need one.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    5. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Have him do Bickram Yoga for 90 days straight and he will be ready to Vin Diesel into the ground.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Totally. After all, Harrison "Solo" Ford is doing Indiana again.

      I'd prefer the good old RDA over any DiCaprio kind of actor every day. If they'd had done that with Knight Rider we could then have a The Hoff Vs McGyvera la Alien Vs Predator!
      That would be the mother of all the balltes.

    7. Re:Why sombody else than Anderson? by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Get Anderson- he's the man!

  14. Christian Bale maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  15. nathan fillion by astroqat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mal from Firefly

    1. Re:nathan fillion by master_p · · Score: 1

      William Shatner!!!!

      "I...can...do...it!!!!...I...am...Kirk!"

    2. Re:nathan fillion by Bazards · · Score: 0

      He would be perfect for it if they couldn't get RDA.

  16. Kurt Russel? by ettlz · · Score: 1

    Or, maybe not...

    1. Re:Kurt Russel? by unforkable · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no , ....Chuck noris...

    2. Re:Kurt Russel? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Shoot, if Richard Dean Anderson can play a role that Kurt Russel made famous, it only seems natual that Kurt Russel would play a role that Richard Dean Anderson made famous.

    3. Re:Kurt Russel? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      That was the obvious answer that came to mind, yes.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  17. Age an issue. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Macgyver character is a younger character unless we are making a movie about "Old Macgyver".

    So it would need to be a younger actor.

    The character is smart and a little light so you would need a younger actor who has a smart/little light persona or someone new.

    And RDA has a certain way of talking that he carries through all his characters (sort of the, heck i'm just a country bumpkin (while really being quite smart)). Do you take that away and re-envision macgyver or do you keep it and come across like a poor imitation of RDA?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Age an issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Age never stopped Snake.

    2. Re:Age an issue. by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They also usually showed Macgyver being nimble and fast. That wouldn't be so believable in an older actor.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:Age an issue. by Afecks · · Score: 1

      Actually, a retired bitter MacGyver called back into action wouldn't be too bad. I like how RDA's character in SG-1 was always a little cynical. MacGyver has to change with the times just like real people.

    4. Re:Age an issue. by mikesd81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What could work is if RDA took over for Pete Thornton's job (since Dana Elcar passed away 3 years ago) and possibly have Jared Padalecki play the new Mac (and by uncle, it RDA's Mac was an only child, HOWEVER, uncle sometimes can be a term used for a close friend of the family...) since he filmed a pilot for Young Mac in 03. He's probably off Summer time anyway between Supernatural seasons.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    5. Re:Age an issue. by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Wasn't KR's version also cynical? I always thought that the prevailing difference between KR's and RDA's version was that RDA didn't play it edgy and suicidal.

    6. Re:Age an issue. by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Funny

      They also usually showed Macgyver being nimble and fast. That wouldn't be so believable in an older actor. The older Richard Dean Anderson had no problem escaping from Patty and Selma's best efforts.

      Oh, wait... nevermind.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    7. Re:Age an issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I had mod points.. this is the smartest compromise I've seen in ages! (This isn't sarcasm, I'm being serious)

    8. Re:Age an issue. by iNaya · · Score: 1

      60 is not so old that one cannot be fast and nimble. Though I doubt RDA is fast and nimble, it's not impossible for someone of that age. When I learnt Judo, the instructors (little Japanese guys) were well into their 60's and 70's, but they could still move more nimbly than any of us teenagers could.

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    9. Re:Age an issue. by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Well you could say the RDA version found a reason to live while the KR's version was just looking for a way to die and blowing up a big ol alien seemed like the best way out.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    10. Re:Age an issue. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not impossible, just highly unlikely. I personally would prefer they go with a different actor, but at least RDA would come cheap.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:Age an issue. by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we need a young(er) action star for this role. Let's go over our options:

      Colleague in Peril: MacGyver! That bomb is going to explode in 10 seconds!
      Shia LeBeouf: (Freezes with that "this can't be happening" sort of expression on his face)
      Bomb explodes. Everyone dies.

      Colleague in Peril: MacGyver! That bomb is going to explode in 10 seconds!
      Will Smith: Aw Hell No! (walks away)
      Bomb explodes. Everyone dies.

      Colleague in Peril: MacGyver! That bomb is going to explode in 10 seconds!
      Matt Damon: So...what...we....need...to...do..is...
      Bomb explodes. Everyone dies.

    12. Re:Age an issue. by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      In RDA's case he's got knee problems that forced him into semi-retirement.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
  18. One of the original stooges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At least then making a harpoon cannon from a brass telescope would make sense. Though it still wouldn't work w/o that special Hollywood "magic".

    McGyver: The Complete Idiot's Genius

  19. Childhood Hero by Andruil · · Score: 1

    Yes! MacGuyver is my childhood hero. I would prefer Richard Dean Anderson to play it regardless of age. Its just not the same without him as MacGuyver. Just like it wouldn't be the same without Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones. I always thought it was cool how'd he'd craft all sorts of nifty inventions with just what he had on hand.

    1. Re:Childhood Hero by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always thought it was cool how'd he'd craft all sorts of nifty inventions with just what he had on hand. Oh, yeah! That part usually got subsumed under the incredible plots and acting.
    2. Re:Childhood Hero by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Gotta go along with this one. RDA is not looking as old as he is, so I think he could easily pull it off.

      Although, I am concerned that his inventions will be limited to pulleys and other non-explosive, non-projectile type doohickeys since any of those could be a formula for a terrorist plot. Shyt, even a laser pointer can be a weapon any more. ::shakes head::

  20. Dave Chapelle by memorycardfull · · Score: 0

    Would put a very entertaining spin on the MacGyver character.

  21. Mullet by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Another serious question: will whomever plays MacGuyver have the correct mullet haircut?

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  22. Jim Carrey in a mullet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come on you were all thinking it!

  23. I can't describe how much i hate that show now by zymano · · Score: 1

    Most of the science on that show was phony.

    I'd rather be save by someone with a leatherman than that stupid boyscout knife.

    Swissarmy toy = corkscrew = LOL

    1. Re:I can't describe how much i hate that show now by grommit · · Score: 1

      Well, according to Leatherman, Mac did use a leatherman. They seem quite proud of that fact.



      http://www.leatherman.com/about-leatherman/history/default.asp
    2. Re:I can't describe how much i hate that show now by mikesd81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And a lot of the science behind what he does was proven plausible, just some extra steps had to be done in real life to make it actually work. Here.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    3. Re:I can't describe how much i hate that show now by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      That's 4 busted, 1 plausible, 3 pass.

      Not a good hit rate... but then it was never supposed to be - it's a TV programme.

    4. Re:I can't describe how much i hate that show now by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      But it proves it's not all phony science. Maybe incomplete, but the science is there.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    5. Re:I can't describe how much i hate that show now by mr_matticus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's 4 pass, 1 plausible, and 3 busted. Add in the three "MacGuyver mini-myths"--all confirmed--and that's 8 to 3 right off the bad.

      One of the busted ones, furthermore, is indeed plausible. A 9hp engine is sufficient for a properly-built ultralight if you know what you're doing. Having not seen MacGuyver in close to 20 years, I have no idea what sort of design it was. However, powered gliders with scooter motors work--as do human-powered gliders (human own problems in the conducting of its tests: they're not always that scientific or well-thought-out.

      The other one, building an ultralight out of makeshift materials, really depends on the materials. The true obstacles is fasteners. That one may or may not be plausible (if he was in a junkyard, sure).

      The sodium one is just bad. MB got that right.

      But that's 9 to 2, maybe even 10 to 1 given a serendipitous setup. That's a pretty good hit rate for a TV show--probably as good as Mythbusters itself.

  24. The last sentence should be... by BigWhale · · Score: 1

    And who, if not Anderson, would want to play MacGyver? :)

    --
    The Sig, the sig
  25. Will Forte? by Covener · · Score: 1

    Will Forte is up for the job... MacGruber!

    1. Re:Will Forte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will Forte is up for the job... MacGruber! He's got ten inches of lovin' and he wants to give it to you..
  26. My Pick for actor by Soong · · Score: 1

    From Firefly, Mal "Capt. Tightpants" Reynolds, Nathan Fillion

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
  27. Here's who I'd pick. by barry99705 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Samuel L. Jackson

    1. Re:Here's who I'd pick. by An+anonymous+reader · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points. :-)
      SLJ as Mac: "Does anyone have a Mother Fucking rubber chicken, so I can disable this Mother Fucking bomb!?!"

  28. Ben Browder? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Wait, its been done...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Ben Browder? by cesman · · Score: 1

      This would be my suggestion as well. ;)

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  29. If not Anderson... by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    ...then Major General Jack O'Neill.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:If not Anderson... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Or maybe Teal'c, just to be ironic.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:If not Anderson... by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      He wouldn't have to think his way out of a problem, just flex a bit.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
  30. On a shoestring budget? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    Insider reports suggest that the production is done with amateurish cameras and gerry-rigged equipment.

    The pay is also rumored to be quite low, as a sound technician has been seen improvising a trap to catch small game in order to feed himself, using nothing more than a piece of wire from his equipment and a twig.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  31. Hot air balloon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curious, did any of you actually succeed in making the hot air balloon that MacGuyver made in one episode? It was two or three feet in diameter, made of paper or plastic or something and used an alcohol soaked cotton ball for the heat source. I tried making this five or six times from age 12 to 17 and have never succeeded. I don't think this has been done on Mythbusters yet either. Any success out there?

    1. Re:Hot air balloon? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Based on your limited description it sounds plausible. However, I remember seeing some documentary about
      MacGyver at the time, and they said they made a point of always getting something wrong in the widgetry
      e.g; it'd take a couple of tons of sugar, and not just a few candy bars, to seal a vat of sulfuric acid.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:Hot air balloon? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Yep. I made many of these when I was 12. You have to use thin waxy paper (the type used by florists to wrap flowers is perfect). They lift really well.

      Based on my experience the one on the show was too heavy for its size (he made it out of paper mache over a basket ball I think).

    3. Re:Hot air balloon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made a bunch of those. ONLY fly them right after a good rain. They have a good chance of coming down before the alcohol has finished burning. The trick is to use really fine wire (extremely thin-wall very small tubing would be much better, but I didn't have any back then), and dry cleaner bags. Cut the extra off of the top and seal off the hole the hook goes through. Alcohol soaked cotton swabs were the lightest fuel source I found.

      Done right you lose em, they go for miles.

  32. How Made by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It was filmed and developed using duct tape, eye-glasses, orange juice, shoe-polish, and paper-clips.

  33. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Jet Li, Jackie Chan, or that fellow from Heroes?

    In any case, let us have an Asian fellow play the part. Make up a story about the young fellow was adopted by a couple named "MacGyver." They sent him to MIT, Cal Tech, or UC Berkeley.

    Let us have some realism to the story!

    I am only kidding.

  34. What About Kattee Sackhoff? by reallocate · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well... the obvious thing to do is to pass the MacGyver torch to a kid and let Anderson, if he's inclined, play his father and/or boss.

    And who says it has to be a guy? What about Katee Sackhoff??

    But, seriously, I won't buy tickets unless Marge Simpson's sisters are in it.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:What About Kattee Sackhoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh snap! I was going to say the same thing. And specifically suggest Katee as well. She's going to need something to do now that her interesting and unexplored villainess in bionic woman will go further unexplored due to cancellation.

    2. Re:What About Kattee Sackhoff? by westlake · · Score: 1
      And who says it has to be a guy?

      The fun and charm of a series like MacGyver, Columbo, or Mission: Impossible is that the conventions of the action-adventure genre are inverted. The hero's only weapons are his intelligence, ingenuity, and psychological insight.

    3. Re:What About Kattee Sackhoff? by Falstius · · Score: 1

      Women MacGuyver? Jewel Staite (Mechanic girl from Firefly, new doctor in SG:Atlantis).

  35. He's not all that busy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can pull Harrison Ford out of mothballs to play Indy "one last time", there's no reason RDA can't pull his khakied ass off Stargate SG-1 to play the role that made him a household name.

    What would Neil Patrick Harris do?

  36. Who the hell cares about MacGyver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are they making a movie version of The Greatest American Hero?

    Or better yet, Tales of the Gold Monkey

  37. one obvious /.er by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wil Wheaton

  38. Burn Notice by hack++slash · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone else watched the 1st season of Burn Notice? The main character is almost like a modern-day MacGyver, especially with his use of on-hand materials and with the voice-over narration of his MacGyveresque antics like RDA did in MacGyver. And just how many times can I say MacGyver in this MacGyver related post?

    I think Jeffrey Donovan would make a half-decent MacGyver (damnit, I said it again).

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:Burn Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it's a great show with a lot of the mcguyver feel to it.
      too bad he's a fag.

    2. Re:Burn Notice by HomerJ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a fan of the show. It's one of those shows that doesn't take itself THAT seriously, without being corny.

      And yes, he always makes nifty spy stuff with various things. Not quite MacGyver, but in the same ballpark.

    3. Re:Burn Notice by toganet · · Score: 1

      You know, I hadn't made the connection, but I definitely see the parallels. I'm a fan of both shows (grew up wanting to be MacGyver) and I was thrilled when I heard USA had ordered more episodes of Burn Notice. Let's hope the writers can keep it up.

    4. Re:Burn Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the connection to MacGyver. I had stared describing Burn Notice as more of a modern day A-Team though. There's a big mystery concerning former employers. Always trying to solve the mystery but spending most of the time helping out people in need that are referred to him and making things out of duct tape the whole time.

      Great show.

      tk

    5. Re:Burn Notice by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      Always enjoyed the episodes they'd shipped to Australia, here's hoping they by the second series and I don't have to use valuable ISP bits to bring it to my eyeballs.

  39. Greg Kinnear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not Anderson ... who are we kidding, Sly did Rambo, but if not, then Greg Kinnear.

    I'm dreading though that it might become some new, young, upcoming all-american type.

  40. Why wouldn't i want to? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You get paid quite a bit for doing a movie. And i hear it can be fun too.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  41. The Mullet by Angry+Rooster · · Score: 1

    I was just discussing this possibility with friends the other day. We decided that the mullet would have to stay, but in one of the first scenes he'd have to cut the back(the "party" end, if you will) and weave a rope from it to escape.

      - Rooster

  42. Come on! by Derek+Loev · · Score: 1

    They've been talking about a Magnum P.I. movie for years. Obviously, that should come first.

  43. Was there a previous MacGyver? by KC1P · · Score: 1

    This may be my geezer memory going, and imdb.com absolutely does *not* back me up, but I thought I saw early episodes of MacGyver as part of "CBS Late Night" which was what CBS briefly called the hodge-podge of bad movies and not-ready-for-prime-time (and often not-half-hour-multiple) TV shows that they ran after midnight (I remember Letterman being annoyed with the name, he was still at NBC at the time). I thought the actor was not Anderson?

    Someone straighten me out so I can sleep at night (I already sleep OK during the day).

    1. Re:Was there a previous MacGyver? by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia doesn't back you up, either, and also mentions that the regular series ran on ABC (but was released on DVD by CBS for some reason).

    2. Re:Was there a previous MacGyver? by KC1P · · Score: 1

      OK then! Thanks. I'm taking a nap now.

  44. Another possible actor: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Michael Welch as MacGuyver? He's (almost) done it before.

  45. MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work anyhow by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They need to keep it 80's because MacGyver with 21st century tech wouldn't work anyway. I think the 80's was probably about the only decade when a concept like MacGyver would work, for the following reasons:

    Things just aren't simple enough or accessible enough anymore. Think about the 80's... things were starting to get really high tech, PCs had just been invented, etc, but all that was still in the early stages. It was easy for Mac to hotwire or jury-rig a car, mess with a computer, oscilloscope or some other high tech piece of equipment, tie the wires of a car phone into a car security system, etc.

    On a modern show, what is Mac going to do? Almost everything is an integrated circuit these days. Intel cpus are made with 45 nm process. You can't just go in and mess with the wiring on something like that, or even repair it when it breaks. In fact, almost none of our technology can be repaired anymore. Most of it has to be scrapped, and a new factory chip put in, because no one can physically deal with the level of miniaturization we have now using just their hands. And going back to the car example, most modern cars have computers built into everything, including the tires. There's a lot less jury rigging that can go on with those. And the security systems, with chips inside keys, etc, etc, makes it a lot harder to just go hotwire one.

    The other issue MacGyver of the 21st century would have to deal with is the level of specialization required to do most anything. You can't just jump into a device and start messing with it, because as was stated above, most things are computerized integrated circuits. There are a lot more black boxes and many more types of engineers involved in almost any project, so knowledge of basic principles and a strong grasp of chemistry doesn't carry you nearly as far.

    That said, I think if they are going to have a 21st century MacGyver, they need to rewrite his back story a bit. I think in the show he had a physics (and maybe chemistry?) degree, but for this decade they'd better give him a compsci/computer engineering degree instead (perhaps still combined with his physics or chem degree). And they almost have to make him more hacker-ish. In the 21st century, 90% of what he does would touch computers, so if they make him a reverse engineering expert specializing in software (which is the easiest thing to circumvent/mess with/jury rig), he might be believable again. I've seen clips on youtube of people hacking those electronic signs over freeways and putting in their own personal messages, and there's really no end to what software you can hack at this point. So if they took that route, he'd be believable again.

    Lastly, though, I think they need to have RDA in the role, and I think it's good that he's probably in his 50s. Mac was always a lifelong learner, so you could convincingly say he went back to school in the interim and picked up the comp sci degree. Also, I don't think I would find a movie or show like MacGyver very convincing in this day and age unless the star was probably 45. There's just too much to know for some 28 year old to take the part and seem convincing, no matter how much of a buff action star he may be. So if RDA can work out and get into shape again (he didn't look the greatest in that superbowl mastercard commercial), I think he's absolutely the one who should be cast for this.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  46. I take back what I said about RDA by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

    I take back what I said above about RDA and the mastercard commercial. Looking at this recent picture of him on wikipedia, he TOTALLY looks like he's in good enough shape for the movie. He looks way better than Harrison Ford even, so if Ford is ready for Indiana Jones, then I'm sure RDA can reprise MacGyver. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dean_Anderson

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    1. Re:I take back what I said about RDA by nem75 · · Score: 1

      I don't know which picture you're looking at, I only see one from 2005. That's not too recent.

  47. Hollywood is "in-touch" by runnerup · · Score: 1

    Who would I want to play MacGuyver? Well, speaking in my capacity as a major Hollywood executive, I would probably want either Hayden Christensen or Shia LeBoeuf.

  48. Put RDA back in by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

    I think you put RDA back in. I just looked at a recent picture of him on wikipedia, and he looks more than good enough to reprise his role. If Harrison Ford can do Indiana Jones again, then looking at what I see of MacGyver I would say he looks ready (except that he'll have to grow his mullet back out).

    I think as long as the original actor is in good enough shape and recognizable, you put them back into the role, and I think that's definately the case for RDA.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    1. Re:Put RDA back in by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      I just looked at a recent picture of him on wikipedia, and he looks more than good enough to reprise his role.

      There was that Mastercard commercial . It debuted during the 2006 Superbowl (two years ago).
      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    2. Re:Put RDA back in by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I heard the Hoffmeister was "not available" for the (perhaps) upcoming "Knight Rider"-Movie... but as long they can still cast the same voice-actor for K.I.T.T... (german dubbed version)

      --
      bickerdyke
  49. Mythbusters. by argent · · Score: 1

    One of the blokes from Mythbusters. And give them free rein over the gadgetry.

    If you can't get them, then hell, how about Tom Hanks?

  50. New MacGyver by cenunez · · Score: 1

    I think that only Bill Gates and Steve Jobs should audition for the role. And may the best geek win!

  51. prior commitments by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Richard Dean Anderson already has prior commitments not doing stargate, he won't have enough time to not do MacGyver as well.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:prior commitments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably already done all the filming, since the new stargate movie starring RDA is supposedly coming out in 2 months...

  52. Re:What About Reese Witherspoon? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    How about female, blond, and spacy? Reese Witherspoon did an amazingly interesting job in Legally Blond with both the technical aspects of the law; and the satire. Instead of a mullet how about a disarmingly, blond, geeky smile? And pink; don't forget the pink.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  53. screw that, MAN FROM ATLANTIS!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or even better, Run, Joey Run

  54. Sean Connery by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because nothing is more American than Sean Connery. Teamed up with Samuel L Jackson (because, you know, he's in everything).

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:Sean Connery by cpricejones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We're talking MacGyver here. You mean that we need the head of RDA, the voice of Sean Connery, and the torso of Samuel L Jackson. I suggest surgical tape and pliers.

  55. problems on set... by unityofsaints · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine the argument between DOP and focus puller:

    D.O.P. - "Check the gate!"
    Focus Puller - "There's a HAIR in the gate!"
    D.O.P. - "The gate IS a hair, stupid!"

    (O.K., maybe only movie buffs will get this but here are a few clues: focus puller / DOP / gate )

  56. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    That said, I think if they are going to have a 21st century MacGyver, they need to rewrite his back story a bit. I think in the show he had a physics (and maybe chemistry?) degree, but for this decade they'd better give him a compsci/computer engineering degree instead (perhaps still combined with his physics or chem degree). And they almost have to make him more hacker-ish. In the 21st century, 90% of what he does would touch computers, so if they make him a reverse engineering expert specializing in software (which is the easiest thing to circumvent/mess with/jury rig), he might be believable again. I've seen clips on youtube of people hacking those electronic signs over freeways and putting in their own personal messages, and there's really no end to what software you can hack at this point. So if they took that route, he'd be believable again. Sounds good to me -- I have degrees in computer engineering, physics, and maths, and I've done a bit of reverse engineering. Maybe I should audition for the role.
  57. Was it really any good? by mmcuh · · Score: 1

    I loved MacGyver when I was a kid, but when I watched a few reruns a year ago or so I was surprised by how bad it was. Poorly written, very badly acted, and extremely embarrassing bad guys (especially the foreign ones).

    You may think that Saturday Night Live's "MacGruber" skits are satire, but they are pretty much identical to the original. Except that MacGyver always succeeded.

    I don't think I'd want to see a MacGyver movie.

    1. Re:Was it really any good? by Onyma · · Score: 1

      IMO watch any 80's series of that genre and you'll find they were generally crap (with a couple notable exceptions) The actors have matured, the concept will mature, but most importantly the expectations of the audience have changed dramatically. Today TV shows have the type of plot and character depth you didn't even get in movies in the 80's. I think any new movie would (I'd hope) reflect the standards of today's audience.

      --
      Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
    2. Re:Was it really any good? by iNaya · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that a lot of movies from the 80's had plot and character depth that you don't find in any films or TV shows released these days.

      The Elephant Man and The Shining are excellent examples for character development and plot, while Die Hard is (IMHO) one of the best action movies ever made.

      A lot of newer movies, like Titanic are utter crap when it comes to character development. For instance, Jack starts off as a crude character, but very quickly starts behaving like a normal 1990's man. And the plot, well.

      As for Pearl Harbor, same kind of thing. The plot was WAY overdone, and things happened way too quickly to even get a handle on the personality of the main characters after they became older than 16.

      Of course, there are also many good movies created recently, and many bad one's created in the 80's, but you can't just blanket the time period and say that their films weren't a high standard. If you bothered watching a few more films, you would realise that many films from the 50's, 60's, etc. should meet your standards, whether they include trashy chick-flicks or heavy psychological enquiry.

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
  58. It's a trend these days.... RDA for sure. by Onyma · · Score: 1

    RDA to play MacGyver. If Harrison Ford can reprise Indy, RDA can easily do a movie or two. I *personally* don't think the franchise concept has enough gas in it to spawn a huge following and a long series of movies, etc. with a new face in the role. Most of the big fans really just want to re-live the late 80's... see MacGyver stop global annihilation with chewing gum and a paperclip a few more times... and put a nice wrapper on the whole series. No better way to do that than with RDA.

    Duchovny and Anderson in a new X-Files movie.
    Ford reviving Indy
    Willis reviving Die Hard
    Stalone in new Rambo and Rocky movies

    It's a no brainer.. all making good money. RDA has to do MacGyver and Selleck has to do Magnum.

    --
    Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
  59. Will Forte is a natural fit by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    He's been auditioning for the role for some time on http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8433640887694062971&q=macgruber+snl&ei=2UMeSJrVIorQ4gL-h6TFAQ&hl=en>SNL.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  60. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by confused+one · · Score: 1

    That said, I think if they are going to have a 21st century MacGyver, they need to rewrite his back story a bit. I think in the show he had a physics (and maybe chemistry?) degree, but for this decade they'd better give him a compsci/computer engineering degree instead

    I take issue with this. I have an applied physics degree; and, I can write code and hack hardware as well as most with a cs or ce degree.

    In fact, I am always amazed at just what we gratuitously stuff processors into. Digital coffee maker anyone?

    I think having a physics degree would be adequate for MacGyver.

  61. Set acquisitions by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    You can feel for the poor sod who has to manage the set items, 1. 200lb of used chewing gum 2. 400 paper clips in various sizes. 3. Paper that morphs into a 4 door family sedan with ABS when water is added.

  62. Tell me, Mr Anderson, how can you act by Megahard · · Score: 0, Redundant

    when you have no mouth?

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  63. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get your heads out of your asses.
     
    this kind of shit sucks. what the fuck is so nerd about mcguyver except for your lack of technical knowledge? mcguyver is shit and if you like it you're a worm in the shit. you probably like comic books too. fucking queers.

  64. Never old..... by Marnok · · Score: 0

    MuffDyver...

    Beavis

  65. Who should play MacGuyver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any doubt as to who should play MacGyver?

    Two words: Chuck Norris

  66. Since it's undercover all the times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recommended Austin Power.

  67. Robot by hound3000 · · Score: 1

    If RDA doesn't play MacGyver, then they should get a robot to play RDA playing MacGyver.

    And let's just forget about MacGyver's kid.

    (You can get one of those robots through the Stargate, it won't even know it's not RDA.)

  68. Talk about a Macgyverism.... by martin_henry · · Score: 1

    This article showed up in my RSS feed in gmail as I was watching a Macgyver episode on veoh.com!

    --
    www.purevolume.com/martyd
  69. Movie Budget by lilfields · · Score: 1

    I heard the movie budget is in fact a tooth pick, a thimble, a grenade pin and a piece of string.

  70. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

    For all the reasons you outline, I feel a Macgyver movie would be a bad idea because it would likely be "updated" as Miami Vice and SWAT were for today, losing much of its relevance. It would end up being a spoof. Even a modern day A-Team where the team are former Iraqi war vets would do better, although if that one is set in Los Angeles but filmed in Phoenix, I'll be pissed.

    Nah, better to not risk it. Make Garth Margengi's Dark Place into an actual show instead.

  71. Stupid Slashdot and HTML parsing in "Plain text" by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

    However, powered gliders with scooter motors work--as do human-powered gliders (human own problems in the conducting of its tests: they're not always that scientific or well-thought-out. Should read:

    However, powered gliders with scooter motors work--as do human powered gliders (human < 1hp). This exposes MB's own problems in the conducting of its tests: they're not always that scientific or well-thought-out.

    Also, it's "right off the bat"--not bad, as I typed.
  72. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Things just aren't simple enough or accessible enough anymore..."

    So that was Diebold's plan all along! They heard about the upcoming MacGyver film, and being huge fans, decided to do their part to maintain the 80s status quo with low-tech, easily-hacked technology. It finally makes sense now!!!

  73. Good point, but by m93 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how about this: part of the appeal of a 21st century MacGuyver to a younger audience could be his ability to apply his wit to situations by coming up with low-tech solutions to high-tech problems. Kids today have grown up in a world where technology does most things for them: people today aren't as practical as they were in the past. Seeing someone who can manipulate the world around them in clever ways in order to solve problems could translate to fascination, and to the success of said project.

  74. RDA's cameo role by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    I think RDA should have a cameo as McGiver's father. He could have the following line: "You get off my .... lawn .... kids, these days".

  75. Justin Long by yopie · · Score: 1

    Justin Long as MacGuyver and John Hodgman as Murdoc.

  76. Wil Wheaton by Johnny00 · · Score: 0

    I mean, come on! He was practically Young MacGyver on TNG and he's about the right age now. I bet he'd love to do it too. Wasn't he a Mac fan too?

    --
    I live life on the edge ... of my desk.
  77. Patty and Selma... by belZaah · · Score: 1

    ... will love this!

  78. Please, please, please... by knisa · · Score: 1

    PLEASE let it be like MacGyver was before it jumped the shark. I wanna see Mac kicking some terrorist / commie butt, not playing Captain Planet. Keep Al Gore away from the set.

    For an alternative actor I'll echo calls for Fillion or Damon. Someone who looks clean cut and American (yes, I understand the irony with who I suggested to play the role).

    --
    This space for rent.
  79. MacGyver for the new millenium by Guerilla*+Napalm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Opening scene: MacGyver is standing in a queue at the airport waiting to board a flight, only to be arrested as a terrorist when security officials discovers his swiss army knife. He's shipped off to Guantanamo Bay, and dies in a failed waterboarding interrogation.

  80. David Hasselhoff by kikito · · Score: 1

    Only The Hoff is up to the challenge, if RD is unavailable.

  81. Apples and Oranges by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    Dude... Harrison Ford is Han Solo... you can't, in good conscience, put Richard Dean Anderson up against that. It's just not fair.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Apples and Oranges by operagost · · Score: 1

      Actually, MacGyver will have an unfair advantage because Lucas won't allow Han Solo to shoot first. That will give MacGyver plenty of time to make a smoke bomb out of detergent and pickle juice to make his escape.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  82. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by dodobh · · Score: 1

    Put it in the far future, where things are controlled by thought alone.

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  83. Without RDA, this movie is pointless! by dotmax · · Score: 1

    that is all. oh, and you don't have to do it '80s. There's plenty of postmillenial cheezeball tech workarounds for Mac to work. Lessee... he could rescue an airbus 320 with his iPhone, he could lift an overturned semi trailer off a van full of nuns by using his passenger-side airbag and he could turn his microwave into a navigational beacon for the space shuttle. I could go on for quite a while...but you get the point. this stuff writes itself!

  84. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by master_p · · Score: 1

    You and I know this, but the average Joe does not. If MacGyver starts playing with a black box, the average Joe would think that's possible.

    On the other hand, if the writers are clever, they can use whatever today's technology has available. Many online systems are vulnerable to various kinds of attacks, many black boxes have hidden-in-plain-sight holes in them (admin password for CISCO routers, for example) etc.

  85. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by topologicalanomaly47 · · Score: 1

    you'd be amased of what the right size hammer can do to all this "complicated technology" or how many high tech security systems in the end trigger a simple relay or use normal open as opposed to normal closed circuits.

  86. And will he finally shag Patty and/or Selma? by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1

    Actually, avoiding that could make for a pretty rough and intense end-battle.

    --
    sig? Oh, that sig...
  87. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To fit the current trend of ignorance leading to bliss, he should have a young, religious preacher as a sidekick. As Mac could no more work out the integrated circuits, the duo could get out the tough spots by praying for a divine intervention. The episodes could always end up for the dynamic duo to participate in Sunday church as MacGyver slowly starts to give up science for blind faith.

    MacGyver: You know Mitt, those computer's where Intelligently Desigined after all.
    "Laughter"
    Roll credits.

  88. Just give him a 2000s Sidekick... by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1

    ... maybe sporting one of them inane gel-shaped pseudo-mohawks. Just think of the hours of fun we could have waching them battle mullet vs. globhawk. Maybe some extreme styling, right near the end of the movie: the blow-dryer is wet, but the wet-gel is dry. What to do, what to do... but wait!... The gravity of the moon, some Wet-Gel, a little burst from that Hair-Spray-Can and just one match could... [WOOOOOMP] Ah. Never mind. Who likes bald guys, anyway.

    --
    sig? Oh, that sig...
  89. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    I think you made some valid points, but I still think it could easily be done with some imaginative script writing.

      The premise of the show was not his specilization of skills, but his ability to assess a situation, and use the tools in the environment to escape/remedy the problem (using physics/chemistry/etc). In essence, he was a bit like a ninja (Ninja MacGyver would be awesome..but I digress).

        I imagine the movie to be a bit like Bear Grylis (Man Versus Wild), in adapting to any situation using what you have. Sure the technology has changed, but the physics (in general) has stayed the same (things still explode/react as they did in the 80's). MacGyver would not have to be an Ubber Hacker to make a good film.

    --
    Sig it.
  90. OMG Woohoo by cryptodan · · Score: 1

    I am so going to see this movie even if I have to get a baby sitter. I grew up on MacGvyer, and watched the show religiously not missing a single show/mini-movie.

  91. It Must Be Anderson! by airship · · Score: 1

    I think RDA did a fantastic job reprising the MacGuyver role in that commercial he did a year or two ago for MasterCard. I don't see why he couldn't do it for a full-length film.

    He's in at least as good a shape as Harrison Ford was for reprising Indiana Jones.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  92. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    I agree - if you wanted to do something like that today, you'd focus on the other aspects that a spy-action-hero-on-a-budget would do - still a little bit of rigging things where possible, but also a few clever physical tricks, some social engineering, and a lot more clever planning. We don't get the 80s version, but we still get something.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  93. Anderson is Ancient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know if you've seen a current photo of R.D.A., but he is old, old, old, and he looks older than that. They had to take him out of his action role on Stargate SG-1 (the story reason was a promotion, ha ha) because he's too old, and it's simply not plausible for him to be jumping around like way back when he was a lad of 60.

  94. Casting by kjenks · · Score: 1

    The next MacGyver should be played by Ellen Page.

  95. It won't be a true MacGyver film... by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

    unless they can create it using only a small length of string, a bent penny, a can of hairspray, and a piece of used chewing gum.

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  96. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    I agree with you but I think the whole concept of making a MacGyver movie in the 21st century would be to unbelievable.

    It would be as believable as a scene in one of the Mission Impossible movies where a scientologist riding on a motorbike can takeout snipers in a mid-air jump while throughout the whole scene he is never touched by a single bullet.

    The only way it could be made believable is if RDA was a android in the 22nd+ century. And with that, RDA would touch such a tacky plot line.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  97. Best MacGuyver episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else remember that episode where MacGuyver gets in a situation thats impossible to get out of, then makes something out of nothing and gets out of it?!?

    The movie should be just like that

    For those of you who didn't catch it, that description works for every single MacGuyver episode.

  98. Hmmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Malkovic.
    He's the answer to the the vast majority of "who should play who" as long as it's not a "buff action hero"

  99. No no no no no! by Antifuse · · Score: 1

    Man... as much as I have awesome fond memories of watching MacGyver as a kid... I made the mistake of going back and watching some episodes in reruns a few months back. WOW. That is some horrendous TV right there.

  100. Hot Night on the Old Town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already got a double date planned for the premiere with my two babes, Patty and Selma.

    You know I'm gonna get me some that night.

  101. who to play mcgyver by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Ashton Kutcher. I never did like the tv show, but watching Kutcher bumble through MIT-inspired contraptions might be entertaining, in a "so bad it's good" fashion.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  102. Nathan Fillion by 7Prime · · Score: 1

    Hey, why not? He sorta looks the part, and he has some of those similar rye facial expressions. I think he'd be perfect for the part.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  103. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by ex-geek · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the first episode about MacGuyver entering some high tech lab by redirecting lasers and fighting against automated guard bots?

    MacGuyver dealt with a lot of then advanced and futuristic technology. The problem is that most of this stuff is not as exciting and new anymore. Computers were kind of a mystery back in the 80ies. This allowed for a lot of imaginative story lines. I don't believe that the feeling of MacGuyver, Tron, Knight Rider or War Games could be replicated, now that computers, the internet and electronics are about as exciting as a washing mashine.

    Cell phones ruin a lot of potential plot lines, as some other poster noted. The kind of encyclopedic knowledge about technical subjects that MacGuyver had, is pretty worthless in our days of Google and Wikipedia as well.

    So what is left? Maybe social engineering, as well as the usual escape plot.

  104. If not Anderson, would you want to play MacGyver? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Well, I think the obvious answer is "Ben Bowder"

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  105. Re:MacGyver in 21st century tech wouldn't work any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Things just aren't simple enough or accessible enough anymore. Think about the 80's... things were starting to get really high tech, PCs had just been invented, etc, but all that was still in the early stages. It was easy for Mac to hotwire or jury-rig a car, mess with a computer, oscilloscope or some other high tech piece of equipment, tie the wires of a car phone into a car security system, etc.

    To some extent, that could be the movie. Old Mac has been sidelined and forced to watch younger, more 'with it' agents take his job. So somehow he gets in a jam or is recalled (or whatever - need the money) and he get to give them their come-uppance. Like Space Cowboys or something.

  106. Matt Damon @ Team America by teko_teko · · Score: 1

    Matt Damon would make an excellent MacGyver.

    But he looked so stupid in that movie "Team America". Hardly can deliver any dialog...