Slashdot Mirror


Weak US Dollar Means Nintendo Favors Europe For Now

timeOday writes "The LA Times is reporting that the new Nintendo Wii Fit is hard to find on US shelves, due not only to strong demand but also the United States' declining status in the world economy: '"[Nintendo] is also is shrewdly maximizing its profit by sending four times as many units to Europe, reaping the benefits of the strong euro," says Michael Pachter, an analyst with Wedbush Morgan Securities. "The shortage demonstrates one consequence of the weak dollar. We're seeing companies ignore their largest market simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere."'"

588 comments

  1. Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel like a Canadian

    how long until US quarters get stuck/rejected by Canadian vending machines and laundermat washing machines

    1. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Well, this may be a sign of things to come. We no longer manufacture things in the US, basic big stuff like steel, etc. We just depend on buying it cheaper overseas.....however, what if this continues from Wii to other more important things we need in the US? We're fscked if all the industry we shipped overseas stops selling back to us.

      On the bright side...well, maybe some of those industries will come back, but, that takes time...and with all the tree huggers over here taking so much power...it still may not happen.

      I like a nice clean world too...but, strike a balance guys....if it comes to the US failing, and a couple of spotten owls, I'll feel sorry for the owls, but, I gotta say humans and our needs take priority.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Oh the humanity by Antiocheian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not from the US, but I can assure you that your di to buy consumer electronics is a big advantage for your own economy.

      At the same time, you sell cheaper to other countries which means more exports for you. In fact it's the first time in my life I saw an advertisement for a Dodge in local TV.

    3. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      environment stuff has little to do with manufacturing leaving the us (europe has far stricter environmental laws and a now-stronger manufacturing base). It's the us's strange infatuation with imaginary property laws that does it. Patents favour lawyering skills over engineering skills.

    4. Re:Oh the humanity by ozamosi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also, while our European governments steal all our money for taxes, we use it for better things than throwing bombs at some desert...

    5. Re:Oh the humanity by INeededALogin · · Score: 1, Informative

      I like a nice clean world too...but, strike a balance guys....if it comes to the US failing, and a couple of spotten owls, I'll feel sorry for the owls, but, I gotta say humans and our needs take priority. I'd like to share a revelation that I've had, during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you aren't actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with its surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply, and multiply until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet.
    6. Re:Oh the humanity by Stellian · · Score: 0

      Nintendo will dump it's consoles wherever it can find buyers, at whatever price allows them to make money.
      It's not like they have a limited supply of consoles: I'm sure any shortages are temporary, and Nintendo is happy to convert a small Yen price in a large $ amount, and get your money.

    7. Re:Oh the humanity by PixelScuba · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait... your initial point made sense... but your last half is some ridiculous rant against environmentalism. What says we can't save the Spotted Owl AND Increase our industry. We can be environmentally conscious as well as industrially advanced. The problem is that industry is lazy and would gladly steamroll the environment to save a buck.

      I consider myself to be an environmentalist... MOST environmentalist don't say "Don't chop down trees" they say "Chop down what you need and reseed the forest, using technology that limits the impact on the surrounding earth". We can have both strong environmental policy as well as a powerful industry.

    8. Re:Oh the humanity by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I'd like to share a revelation that I've had, during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you aren't actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with its surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply, and multiply until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet.

      Always loved this quote. Of course, the premise is entirely incorrect - "every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with its surrounding environment" is simply not true. Which is why there are boom and bust cycles in the non-human animal kingdom. Lemmings, anyone?

      In fact, the primary limiter to animal populations is that they consume "every natural resource" if they get the chance. Which they don't often, since we're generally higher on the food chain than they are. But they're trying, just as hard as they can, to expand to the very limit of the load-bearing capacity of the land and beyond.

      Just like us....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Oh the humanity by homer_s · · Score: 3, Informative

      We no longer manufacture things in the US, basic big stuff like steel, etc. We just depend on buying it cheaper overseas....

      Here is a pop quiz that may be of help to you:

      1) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing output reach its all-time peak?
      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006


      2) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing revenue reach its all-time peak? (inflation adjusted)
      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006


      3) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing profits reach their all-time peak? (inflation adjusted)
      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006


      4) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing exports reach their all-time peak? (inflation adjusted)
      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006


      5) Average annual compensation (wages + benefits) for US manufacturing jobs is
      a. $36,000 b. $46,0000 c. $56,0000 d. $66,000


      6) What are the relative sizes of the US and Chinese manufacturing sectors?
      a. China outputs 2.5 times the US b. Equal c. The US outputs 2.5 times China


      7) Which country produces the largest share of total world manufacturing output?
      a. China b. Japan c. Germany d. France e. US


      The answers if anyone cares about facts: 1-e,2-e,3-e,4-e,5-d,6-c,7-e

    10. Re:Oh the humanity by JonBuck · · Score: 1

      If by "natural equilibrium" Agent Smith means that population cycles tend to follow rises and Malthusian crashes... then no, we haven't done that yet for a few hundred years. And we should make ever effort to avoid it. The only way people should die is peacefully in old age.

      I have no use for that kind of misanthropy. If you really think that humans are a cancer, what are you doing sitting in front of your computer, posting this?

    11. Re:Oh the humanity by Hojima · · Score: 1

      Thats it! We'll just burn bums for fuel! On a more serious note though, hasn't The Matrix just ignored the second law of thermodynamics? I remember watching it again recently and realized that Morpheus said that the energy process was combined with a form of fusion, but it makes even less sense that some stable form of fusion would require a human being (who have to be conscious rather than in an induced coma).

    12. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like a Canadian So you feel like you're living in a clean, safe country with an economy that's safely in the black and has been for years, low rates of religious belief, and one of the highest standards of living in the world? I can't see how that's a bad thing, to be honest.

    13. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't think of anything better than that.

    14. Re:Oh the humanity by Jorophose · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh please, quit it with the Iraq bullshit.

      Vietnam war was twice as violent, was twice as costly, and you were doing this when a REAL threat to the nation existed (good old CCCP that had nukes and wasn't afraid to use them, not to mention they had a really powerful army sitting right next door to western europe... You know, the same jerks who insult the US every other day).

      You kids these days. And Vietnam was so much more pointless. In Iraq there was a dictator who was a threat to neighbouring regions (and invaded its neighbours constantly), who testing chemical and biological weapons on his own people, who violated so many UN human rights charters... And it help fight the slow death of small, often ignored countries like Lebanon. If it wasn't for the occupation of Iraq I doubt Syria would have backed out of there; then what would you do when an entire culture was extenguished before your eyes, Europe?

      In vietnam communists wanted to control the country. That's why it was invaded, occupied for oh about 20 years, and firebombed/poisoned/raped/sulfurbombed back to the stone age...

      Of course, typical Americans; cleaning up after europe shits all over the place. Abolishing slavery, abolishing monarchies, reinstating civil rights and real courts, cleaning up the mess left in the Middle-East by the English (I'd love to applaud the people who drew those maps up, geniuses amongst men they must have been to mix kurds, sunnis, and shias), and defending Europe as much as they could from facists, from communists.

      Yeah, really getting derailed here...

      Anyway, shouldn't a weaker USD bring more industries? If I was BMW I'd love to settle back in Detroit; little competition from GM/Ford, tons of skilled workers, all at a time when the USD is looking very attractive in comparaison to the Euro.

    15. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2006 was the peak, eh?

      So it's all downhill from here...

    16. Re:Oh the humanity by homer_s · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the data I have is from 2006 and I'm too lazy to look up newer data.

    17. Re:Oh the humanity by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't have much understanding of economics or globalization, do you? I also like the tree hugger angle, really American of you... Utter ignorance mixed with smug self confidence. You talk bullshit and you're proud of it.

      Okay, now this might be kind of hard to understand, but just imagine for a minute that the communist/liberal/homosexual/tree hugger conspiracy doesn't exist. Instead, try and think how people live in other parts of the world, specifically what most people call the 'developing world'. Have you considered how wages and living standards might differ in the 'developing world'? You do realize that the vast majority of labour intensive industrial operations (such as steel) tend to requires very little skill? So why the hell would anyone want to setup a still mill in the US when you can do it for a lot cheaper in some other part of the world.

      Let me give you a more concrete example. In Ukraine (its a country in Europe, it has a pretty highly educated workforce and a pretty large industrial base), a salary of $20K is considered pretty damn good, especially if you live outside the capital Kiev. And I am not talking about some shitty job in a steel mill, even a management position with a $20K salary is considered pretty good. Now what do you think an average American still mill worker gets paid per year? is $35K a fair estimate? So why shouldn't business simply setup shop in Ukraine, spend a little bit more on transportation and save the bunchload of cash.

      I know that it's easy to make up excuses about the tree huggers ruining everything, but unfortunately sometimes you have to use your brain and think straight. Industrial production is never coming back to the USA! Not unless Americans are going to accept Bangladesh style wages/living standards.

      And what power are you talking about? The power to make you sound retarded? You live in America, you have one pro-business party that has a fascists/right wing and another socially liberal/centrist wing.

      Right wing armchair economists are such a laugh. Though I guess I shouldn't be laughing, crying would probably be more appropriate.

      If you want to look for the real reason behind Nintendo's decision, I suggest you read up on interest rates. You might learn some interesting things that you never knew about, like how the fed essentially bails investors whenever they fuckup which leads to retarded behavior (among other things that contributed to current economic instability).

    18. Re:Oh the humanity by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On the bright side...well, maybe some of those industries will come back, but, that takes time...and with all the tree huggers over here taking so much power...it still may not happen. I like a nice clean world too...but, strike a balance guys....if it comes to the US failing, and a couple of spotten owls, I'll feel sorry for the owls, but, I gotta say humans and our needs take priority.

      I disagree with this argument for a couple of reasons. First, the assumption is that conservation is somehow altruistic. It isn't. Having a healthy environment is a selfish thing. It means that you don't have to worry about the air or the water making your children sick. It means you can hunt deer, catch fish, and grow vegetables in your yard and actually eat them. It means you can eat sushi whenever you want. It means being able to take your family out for a walk and being able to show them something besides a strip mall. Fuck the owls, I want the environment saved for me and my kids.

      Second, I disagree with the idea that raping the environment is the way forward. It's a short term solution. Unquestionably, cutting down all the redwoods would create a few jobs and make some money, but once you'd finished, you'd be right back where you started. The way forward is investing in infrastructure, technology, and education. Lay down broadband, improve the quality of our primary and secondary education, make college education affordable for any kid who works hard in high school. Invest in alternatives to oil- you'd simultaneously help reduce our dependency on mideast oil and create a product the rest of the world would want to buy. Build more mass transit, which would create jobs, reduce energy consumption, and provide the infrastructure to help the economy grow. It's not a situation of having a liveable environment or a good economy; we have to try for both.

    19. Re:Oh the humanity by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      What are you referring to as "manufacturing output?" Just try finding an American-made TV set, computer, video game unit or other electronic device.

    20. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I don't believe its true, but sources please?

    21. Re:Oh the humanity by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is absurd. The US has been running deficit budgets (to pay for wars) and balance of payments for decades. Consumers have not been saving; in fact the rate of savings in the US is negative.

      Other parts of the world with strong economies have IP laws that are just as strong as in the US and are doing fine.

      It is all about unwise fiscal policies that are resulting in the decline of the dollar.

    22. Re:Oh the humanity by TheSoepkip · · Score: 1

      Indeed ! For instance moving our travelling circus back and forth between Strasbourg and Brussels gives us a much bigger bang for our buck.

    23. Re:Oh the humanity by Drive42 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lemmings don't throw themselves off of cliffs. That's a myth produced by Disney.

      Snopes:

      http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/lemmings.asp

    24. Re:Oh the humanity by efornara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this may be a sign of things to come. We no longer manufacture things in the US, basic big stuff like steel, etc. We just depend on buying it cheaper overseas.....however, what if this continues from Wii to other more important things we need in the US? We're fscked if all the industry we shipped overseas stops selling back to us.

      On the bright side...well, maybe some of those industries will come back, but, that takes time...and with all the tree huggers over here taking so much power...it still may not happen.

      I like a nice clean world too...but, strike a balance guys....if it comes to the US failing, and a couple of spotten owls, I'll feel sorry for the owls, but, I gotta say humans and our needs take priority.

      Nintendo could just increase the price in dollars, but evidently they think they can make more money this way. Maybe they are afraid to lose the "affordable console" label in people's mind.

      This has nothing to do with essential items; they will be shipped to the US, because they will be bought regardless of the price.

      I don't like tree huggers too, but I think we are a long way to go before we reach the "human needs vs spotten owls" stage. Now it feels much more like "human fabricated wants vs cities with clean air".

    25. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right question is:

      8) In what year had the U.S. the biggest share of Manufacturing output?
      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006

    26. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you use the money to bolster bloated nanny state programs that rob citizens of responsibility and liberty, and are also totally unsustainable given the fertility rate of European countries? Sure sounds like you're doing better with your tax dollars than us.

    27. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Other parts of the world with strong economies have IP laws that are just as strong as in the US and are doing fine

      No they don't. There is nowhere in the world with imaginary property laws as "strong" (read: overreaching) as the US. The EU is being pushed by corporate interests to US levels of insanity, but isn't there yet. Japan is selective (read: racist) about its patenting, with the net effect its imaginary property has loopholes. China isn't anywhere near US levels. Neither is russia, india or brazil. Nowhere else matters.

    28. Re:Oh the humanity by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Informative
      In his figures, a single copy of Windows Vista counts more towards "manufactured goods" than does a mid-range stereo receiver... one copy counts as more than a dozen shovels.

      When you count Britney Spears CDs, Windows, Bewitched and Gilligan's Island DVD box sets, etc. as "manufactured goods," yeah, we turn out a lotta shit.

      TVs, electronics, appliances, clothes, shoes, tools, household goods, various other hardware - not so much as we used to.

      --
      This space available.
    29. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "environment stuff has little to do with manufacturing leaving the us (europe has far stricter environmental laws and a now-stronger manufacturing base)."

      No...I didn't mean it was reason it left...but, is an impediment to it returning. We can't seem to even get to drill for our own oil off the coasts of FL or CA....even with great breakthroughs in safely drilling without spills. We can't seem to build any more refineries any longer, nor build Nuke plants...too much NIMBY.

      I think it is going to hurt us even more in the future. Like I said above (amazingly modded down to hell), I hope to strike a balance...between ecology, and the needs of modern man for materials and energy...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Oh the humanity by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      How about some useful data? Like economic output per capita of the US, Europe and BRIC and their ratio in 1966, 1976, 1986 and 2006.

      Germany alone has enough economic power to compare well to California. And all other states of the US wont be able to compare as well. So much for meaningless numbers.

    31. Re:Oh the humanity by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      I don't have facts, but you need to remember that there are manufactured products out there that don't come with a remote and/or sold in Wal-Mart... Anyone who that watches shows on Discovery Channel or History Channel, such as "Modern Marvels", "How it's Made", is shown many different manufacturing industries still working hard here in the US.

    32. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8) Which country provides the numbers for the above claims?

      a. China b. Japan c. Germany d. France e. US

      answer: e

      9) Based on Chinese sources, which country produces the largest share of total world manufacturing output?

      a. China b. Japan c. Germany d. France e. US

      answer: a

      etc. vote obama, homer! wait, you're not a self-hating liberal. mccain it is, then!

    33. Re:Oh the humanity by homer_s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you referring to as "manufacturing output?" Just try finding an American-made TV set, computer, video game unit or other electronic device.

      How about gas turbines and jet engines (to name 2 off the top of my head)? Oh, they don't sell those in Walmart, so that does not count...well, I concede, America does not make anything.

    34. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Wait... your initial point made sense... but your last half is some ridiculous rant against environmentalism. What says we can't save the Spotted Owl AND Increase our industry. We can be environmentally conscious as well as industrially advanced. The problem is that industry is lazy and would gladly steamroll the environment to save a buck."

      I think you missed the part where I said strike a balance...

      But, sometimes, there is a decision that has to be made...human needs for energy and materials, and some part of nature in a certain area. At some times...tough decisions to preserve or not preserve that area have to be made, and sometimes part of a critters habitat has to lose or be moved. There is a large movement by hard core environmentalists out there that seem to never see that this has to be done occasionally, and might be happy till we're back in the stone age...not all, but, there is a significant number of them with this mentality, that I observer, that are preventing us from doing things...like drilling for our own oil off the coast of CA and FL.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:Oh the humanity by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this a joke?

      In a post that is riddled with historical inaccuracies and plain daft statements, this stands out:

      "Of course, typical Americans; cleaning up after europe shits all over the place. Abolishing slavery."

      WTF? That's a party you were particularly late to (just like both World Wars). You might want to check on the dates for European countries abolishing slavery (hint: generally before you). And as for reinstating civil rights, of course you remember what happened about 40 years ago, right?

      Congratulations on making yourself look like an ass and giving your fellow Americans a bad name.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    36. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "How about gas turbines and jet engines (to name 2 off the top of my head)? Oh, they don't sell those in Walmart, so that does not count...well, I concede, America does not make anything."

      And where do those raw materials, or even parts for those jet engines come from? Are they 100% from the US? If not....and the materials are cut off....so much for that industry.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re:Oh the humanity by homer_s · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And where do those raw materials, or even parts for those jet engines come from?

      You are correct, the USA should immediately cease producing value added goods and produce iron ore and silicon.

    38. Re:Oh the humanity by $random_var · · Score: 1

      Luckily for us, airplanes and war technology have higher margins than consumer electronics. (of course, our war industry is so huge largely because of massive subsidies in the form of sweetheart contracts, so I'm not saying we come out better in the long run)

    39. Re:Oh the humanity by Firefalcon · · Score: 1

      Well, it does give us more politicians and therefore more opportunity to watch them falling on their sword when they do something like this...

    40. Re:Oh the humanity by hairyfeet · · Score: 2
      IIRC the writers were forced to come up with that lame premise because the backers of the film thought the public would be too stupid to get what they had originally intended. What it was supposed to be was that we ARE the machines--that is,our minds are used like a giant distributed neural net. That our dreams are really our subconscious minds trying to interpret the data being sent to it.


      And while I think it would have made for a more thought provoking story,I'm afraid I have to agree with the backers. Because every time I've tried to explain that to non techies I end up staring at blank faces. You ever try to explain something technical to a non tech and watch as their eyes glaze over and they get this "deer in the headlights" look about them? That is what I got when i tried to explain distributed computing. But that is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    41. Re:Oh the humanity by Firefalcon · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to myself, but replace "do" with "get caught doing" - that's what I meant to say...

    42. Re:Oh the humanity by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think your point is well taken, but I don't think anyone is necessarily that concerned with the absolute size of the U.S. manufacturing base. The problem is U.S. exports relative to imports, i.e. the trade or current-accounts deficit.

      The U.S. achieved superpower status with a massive trade surplus throughout much of its history. Heck, the United States was a net exporter of oil during much of petroleum's rise to dominance as the universal energy source for the industrialized world.

      The current trade deficit just doesn't seem like it can possibly be sustainable in the long term. It's only a handful of percent right now, and ironically it's helped by the weak dollar, but it could easily get worse rather than better if misguided "strong dollar" policies are put in place.

      In many ways it seems as though the trade deficit -- and steps taken by the Fed and other policymakers to lessen or hide its effects from the U.S. public -- are at the heart of the current economic crisis.

      Unless we can do something to fix the trade deficit, I can't see anything more than a long, slow economic decline being the best-case outcome for the U.S., while the worst-case (in which succeeding administrations go to greater and greater lengths to prop up a rotten economy addicted to foreign goods that it can ill afford, until it finally collapses) is far more precipitous.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    43. Re:Oh the humanity by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Also, while our European governments steal all our money for taxes, we use it for better things than throwing bombs at some desert...

      And what exactly do you use it for? I'm always hearing how universal healthcare costs Europe less per capita than the US system costs our government. Now if your not going to war (where most of our budget goes), and spend less on healthcare then us, what are you doing with all those taxes?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    44. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Iraq war was at least as pointless as the Vietnam war. Saddam was no threat other than in the eyes of the American public bombarded by the propaganda campaign of the US government.

      If you read Israeli Kuwaiti security reports about Iraq their assessment was; Iraq is essentially a failed state extremely week from a decade of sanctions and poses no security threat.

      Being defenseless is of course a prerequisite for the US to invade as we won't pick on someone that could actually defend themselves (would not be a very productive way to run an empire)

      The worst atrocities Saddam committed was while he was SUPPORTED by the US. This is hugely important piece of information that gets downplayed with "the enemy of our enemy is our friend". But the US was supporting both sides of the Iran/Iraq conflict so there is no moral ground to stand on.

      The problems of Saddam at his worst was he was being supported by an external all powerful military force with deep vested interests in resources of the area, giving him free hand to commit atrocities in the name of "stability" now Iraq has a government in place that commits atrocities in the name of "democracy" with the same power structure. This is not lost on Iraqis. The victims flesh burning white phosphors in Fallujah and the tortured of abu ghraib probably don't care much about the semantics.

    45. Re:Oh the humanity by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am sorry, but I am familiar with IP laws in most of the rest of the developed world. I have 12 patents in my name that have been issued in multiple countries. Japan is actually more lenient in granting patents than the US. The EU is a little more strict but not much. In other areas (copyright) most countries have either a 50 year or 70 year post-mortem copyright period. The US is not at all unusual with it's 70 year period.

      Yes China's situation is a bit different as a developing nation but it is rapidly becoming normalized with the rest of the world as they are starting to develop their own "imaginary property". They are now a member of WIPO, the Paris convention, the Madrid Agreement and have a State Patent and Trademarks office. While enforcement is spotty the trend is obvious.

      Any claim that the US economy isat a disadvantage due to IP laws is hooey.

    46. Re:Oh the humanity by Sique · · Score: 1

      Germany has also about the same number of inhabitants (it's actually a bit more). So your point being?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    47. Re:Oh the humanity by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a surprising amount of industry in the US, but it doesn't get publicity. If you are willing to do skilled manual labor there are plenty of jobs for pipe weldors and other metal fabricators that cannot be outsourced. Caterpillar sells plenty of generators overseas too.

      The American worker needs to become competitive and that means aggressively seeking education and job-specific skills. It is our duty to OURSELVES to be adaptive, multi-skilled, inquisitive, self-teaching, and to hustle for work. People who refuse to do that deserve what they get. Our competitors aren't doing anything we cannot CHOOSE to do.

      As for any "green" obstacles, vote and organize others to vote. Don't forget to vote against the "oilgarchy" who are a MUCH bigger obstacle than the "greenies" they blame-shift onto!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    48. Re:Oh the humanity by actiondan · · Score: 1

      what are you doing with all those taxes?

      education
    49. Re:Oh the humanity by spydabyte · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope that you do not take one nitwit's comments online as truth and project assumptions into real life.

      As an American currently traveling abroad, I have felt this attitude far too often and have felt ashamed for acts I do not support.

    50. Re:Oh the humanity by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, typical Americans; cleaning up after europe shits all over the place. Abolishing slavery, abolishing monarchies, reinstating civil rights and real courts, cleaning up the mess left in the Middle-East by the English (I'd love to applaud the people who drew those maps up, geniuses amongst men they must have been to mix kurds, sunnis, and shias), and defending Europe as much as they could from facists, from communists. Europe abolished slavery first and its citizens generally get more protection where as the US tends to favor business.

      As far as Isreal, I didn't hear the US object to giving them the land and it's the US that defends Isreal these days more than anyone else.

      Going after Iraq for 9/11 isn't cleaning up after Europe. It's making an excuse for Jr to do what daddy didn't do. Though Bush senior, in general, while being called a wimp was more sensible and at least was leaned more to being a sensible republican. It was he who helped make businesses accomodate people with disabilities. Just as Nixon made an attempt to help the environment with creating the EPA.

      Since the Clinton era, the republican party has really gone to hell. In fact US politics in general have gone to hell. That's what's hurting the US more than anything and it makes me glad I've moved out of there years ago.
    51. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Of course you have other places to use that money. The US subsidizes your military. I.e. we fund our military so that you don't have to.

      Unfortunately, the unintended consequence of baby sitting Western Europe was that it invited Western Europe to lecture the US on the unnecessary of war and military.

      Personally, I am fully in favor of pulling all military assets out of the EU now, NATO too. Let's see how much money you have left for your social programs then. Maybe you'll all go back to killing on another.

    52. Re:Oh the humanity by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Wait... your initial point made sense... but your last half is some ridiculous rant against environmentalism. What says we can't save the Spotted Owl AND Increase our industry. We can be environmentally conscious as well as industrially advanced. The problem is that industry is lazy and would gladly steamroll the environment to save a buck.

      The problem I have with your argument is that, like most people, you're just arguing it, you're not actually finding inovative ways to promote industry and save the environment. You're expecting somebody else to do all the work, and refusing to believe them when they explain why it can't be done or is really expensive. You're quick to point out how "lazy" all the industry people are, but you're not actually offering a solution either. Wanting something really bad doesn't make it possible.

      We shouldn't trash the environment for every petty luxury, but there has to be some point where we say "In this case we're going to harm the environment because the benefits outweigh the environmental cost."

      I consider myself to be an environmentalist... MOST environmentalist don't say "Don't chop down trees" they say "Chop down what you need and reseed the forest, using technology that limits the impact on the surrounding earth". We can have both strong environmental policy as well as a powerful industry.

      And what's your solution for something important, like oil? I don't think I've heard the environmental conditions that would satisfy environmentalists for drilling in ANWR or off the coasts. As much as I like paying $4 for a gallon of gas, it'd be really nice if we'd let oil companies pump more oil right about now.

    53. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 12 patents in my name that have been issued in multiple countries

      Thief (patents are theft).

      While enforcement is spotty the trend is obvious.

      And enforcement is what matters. In the US, you get sued for patent infringement even when you're probably not actually infringing. In the EU, you generally don't, even when you probably are.

      Any claim that the US economy isat a disadvantage due to IP laws is hooey.

      No it isn't. I see it every day.

    54. Re:Oh the humanity by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I live in a state where we still have manufacturing jobs, and what we do now, is buy parts from china, and assemble them. assembly is where it's at in America. ship it in from china, put it together, then ship it wherever.

      once we would have built the parts, as well as assembling them... but, at nasty jobs, like food processing plants, there are some jobs, they have to import people from other countries to live in America to work for the wages they're willing to pay. those people make due, by vastly over crowding houses, making due with less, and not buying fancy electronics. American raised kids are much much less likely to take a job in an evisceration section of a meat processing plant.

      no the American raised kids they work in marketing, or in management, or maybe in Quality control, or truck driving, or operating fork lifts.... i mean these places they all claim to be Equal opportunity employers, but then why do all the hmong do the nasty jobs?

    55. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was in Fallujah from 2003-2004. Willy Pete's (white phosphorus) was never used as a "bomb". White Phosphorus is used in illumination rounds, which burn up long before they hit the ground. I never heard of any incident regarding white phosphorus bombs being used. Those pictures you see on google could have been caused by many other methods. If you are willing to say that the majority of the news you see on T.V. is propaganda (which it probably is) than you should also accept that much of what you see on the internet is bullshit as well.

    56. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be expectable for everyone to buy from USA, given the weakness of the currency... They can get things cheaper than from other markets, so those statistics aren't necessarily a good thing.

    57. Re:Oh the humanity by xaxa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, while our European governments steal all our money for taxes, we use it for better things than throwing bombs at some desert... And what exactly do you use it for? I'm always hearing how universal healthcare costs Europe less per capita than the US system costs our government. Now if your not going to war (where most of our budget goes), and spend less on healthcare then us, what are you doing with all those taxes? Excellent question! I've searched around, and UK tax is spent on:
      - Social protection, £159bn
      - Personal social services, £26bn
      - Health, £105bn
      - Transport, £20bn
      - Education, £78bn
      - Defence, £32bn
      - Debt interest, £31bn
      - Industry, agriculture, employment and training, £21bn
      - Public order and safety, £33bn
      - Housing and environment, £22bn
      - Other, £62bn

      What those things mean is defined by the UN. For the UK, most of 'Social protection' is social security benefits, i.e. money given to the unemployed, families, retired people etc.

      For more detail than you could possibly want, see the HM Treasury Report.

      But I think you might have wanted me to say name other things I notice in daily life, other than healthcare, that I don't have to pay for. I'm not sure, since I haven't lived in the US and don't really know how life works there. If I lose my job, I can ask for "Jobseeker's Allowance", and I'll be given £46.85 a week (so long as I prove I'm looking for another job). Other things like that are listed on Direct.gov.uk (e.g. benefits, free travel, pensions, student loans, ...)
    58. Re:Oh the humanity by menace3society · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In fact, it is. Well, not Detroit, but Japanese, Korean, and European car mfrs are opening plants in the USA (mostly the South) faster than the Big Three close them.

      The problem is not the USA, not really. The problem is the culture of entitlement that the automotive cartel fostered in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s. They could charge whatever they wanted for cars, since they were about the only game in town (back then, if you wanted an import, it was a Rolls or a Ferrari, and at that point you don't care about price anyway). They made up for this by giving obscene benefits packages for employees, and in the 70s when Japanese imports started to outdo in price and efficiency, they stupidly agreed to even more boneheaded benefits packages for people who got laid off.

      If they had the balls to say to the UAW, "You know what? From now on, you're getting fair wages for the work you do for us and only current employees get benefits," they wouldn't be so hard up. But there's too much of a culture of failure among management, and the UAW would throw a hissy-fit strike if they tried it.

      It really boils down to the need for nationalized healthcare. If we had that, this whole problem wouldn't exist.

    59. Re:Oh the humanity by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      My state abolished slavery in 1783. Sure, the rest of the US took until 1865, but they're behind on everything. A few years after England, but before the British Colonies.

    60. Re:Oh the humanity by Fritzed · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      A Guide to The Queen's English

      Lift = Elevator
      Colour = Color
      Estate = Station Wagon
      Education = Edumacation

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
    61. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "ou are correct, the USA should immediately cease producing value added goods and produce iron ore and silicon."

      No..not at all, you miss the point. We should strive as much as possible to be as completely self sufficient as possible, or risk our independence to the rest of the world if for some reason where we get stuff from, decides to withhold resources....

      Think about the risk we currently run with oil dependence from foreign sources. Now..extrapolate that to other raw goods.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    62. Re:Oh the humanity by kesuki · · Score: 1

      you might not know this, but i've lived in Minnesota, and i have relatives on the iron range. America produces most of the iron ore we use, we produce so much, we export it to russia, japan, and probably even china. sure steel tends to be smelted wherever it's cheapest, with a weak dollar, that might even be America. estimates put the supply of iron ore up there at somewhere in the 300 year range. there will be iron in northern Minnesota longer than there will be coal to smelt it into steel.

      coal is very useful for smelting steel, because it is a carbon source, and it gets hot enough to make steel, I'm sure with a carbon source, and a hot enough flame, as long as you have energy you can make steel, but, when coal runs out (in say, 100 years or so) there will be a lot of very painful choices, of giving up on the technologies that aren't long term sustainable, in favor of those needed to support humanity.

      windmills to provide the energy to say run hydrogen combustion engine tractors, are a more important way to use limited steel production... basically, at some point, the price of everything ratchets up exponentially as limited resources come into contention. to a much smaller effect the 'post peak' oil problem is driving the price of everything higher...

      tractors and food, and food distribution are fundamental to society without food, people can't eat. i'm glad that my generation only has to find out how we deal with 'post peak' oil. there are offshore sources of oil, but offshore platforms cost more, environmentalists drive the prices higher, especially after hurricane Katrina.

      oil companies have little motivation to 'keep the price of oil' low by massing enough offshore platforms to drive the price of oil low. nah, why do that, when you can milk the mainstream media, and get gas up to $4 a gallon.

      but for the environment, facing $4 a gallon gas, pushes environmental issues, it creates markets for 'bio-fuels' which, some are half decent, algae is of course the holy grail of bio-fuels, and it might be 'cheaper' for energy companies to 'drive algae production up' than to mass many expensive off shore oil platforms where they have to constantly keep things up to date so no oil pollutes the ocean. not that i think that's a bad idea myself, the environmentalists are Definitely going to get off your back if you do algae production in a sustainable way.

      i just wonder if 'they' are going to be able to sustain a price around $4 a gallon for fuel, in the past, it's been a few years of price spikes that lead to overproduction and 'glut' years. biofuel can also have gluts, but if the cost of production is cheap enough, you can sell in different markets than you originally intended.

      oh well.

    63. Re:Oh the humanity by glueball · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Europe abolished slavery first and its citizens generally get more protection where as the US tends to favor business

      Germany used slave labor including child labor through 1945 and France and the rest of the chest-thumping Europeans allowed it as long as Germany wouldn't attack. Europeans abolishing slavery before the US is false. Or did you conveniently forget that?

      The Soviets used slavery until at least the mid 1960's.

      Many in the Muslim world today have slaves. They are called women.

    64. Re:Oh the humanity by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      That dodge was probably made in Canada.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    65. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How It's Made is a Canadian show. Watch the credits, most (all?) of the companies are there.

    66. Re:Oh the humanity by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      ...too much NIMBY. I think it is going to hurt us even more in the future.

      It might hurt us a bit economically, but it will be the kind adveersity that builds some much needed character here in the US. The NIMBY problem is a perfect example, instead of taking pride in their community providing something very useful to the rest of the country, communities get all upset because every American thinks they should live comfortably settled between a golf course and a national park, let someone else have the steel mill/nuclear plant/new railroad run through their town. Of course this attitude starts from the top with Uncle Sam. When our government can just spend and spend and spend, favoring convenience over consequences, why should any American worry about consequences? Loss of buying power will be good for us. Maybe as Americans realize that we are no longer a superpower but are now competing amongst our equals, things that now suffer from NIMBY and other "I'm too good for that" attitudes will give way to an interest in strengthening our entire nation.

      --
      We are all just people.
    67. Re:Oh the humanity by jopsen · · Score: 1

      7) Which country produces the largest share of total world manufacturing output? a. China b. Japan c. Germany d. France e. US It might be relevant to measure this per citizen instead...
    68. Re:Oh the humanity by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      You base a lot of your assertions on wages. Increasingly, wages are a becoming a smaller percentage of the cost of a good. This is especially the case in heavy industry. Much of this progress is due to automation.

      There are still plenty of places where wages are so low the capital cost of automation can't be justified, but the technology is getting cheaper and developing workforces are getting more demanding. There is nothing to indicate that those trends will change, so saying that manufacturing is never coming back to the US is silly.

      Indeed, as fuel drives up transportation costs leanness in manufacturing will depend even more on smartly locating an operation near raw materials sources and the customer base. The days of 10,000 employee assembly plants are what is truly behind us.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    69. Re:Oh the humanity by HalAtWork · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, you laughed at us when you were on top, but I bet you wished you accepted our quarters now!

    70. Re:Oh the humanity by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Since ALL of Hollywood made $46 billion in 2006, and the manufacturing sector is $1.6 trillion, I'm going to call your bluff. Even retail software sales only amount to a few billion.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    71. Re:Oh the humanity by vandan · · Score: 1

      and with all the tree huggers over here taking so much power...it still may not happen

      I hate to break it to you, but we're taking over everywhere. Here's the thing: if you can't do things sustainably, then you really don't deserve to be living anyway. You don't have some God-given right to live, to everything else's exclusion, despite what you might claim.

      Anyway, it's not the so-called tree-huggers' fault that your dollar is going down the toilet. You are living WAY beyond your means. It's time to start paying off some of that multi-trillion-dollar debt and living sustainably.
    72. Re:Oh the humanity by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Maths = Math class.

      I liked this one since I heard it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    73. Re:Oh the humanity by vandan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Iraq there was a dictator

      Get over it. He was your biggest ally for decades. The fact that you lost control of him is your own stupid fault.

      who testing chemical and biological weapons on his own people

      Bullshit. It was the US doing the testing. Saddam merely used what the US gave him.

      who violated so many UN human rights charters

      So? Go and invade Israel if you're so concerned about UN human rights charters and resolutions.

      And it help fight the slow death of small, often ignored countries like Lebanon

      WTF?

      In vietnam communists wanted to control the country

      That's quite a simplistic view. I forgive you, considering your other way-off statements so far. Communists HAD taken over Vietnam, and had MASSIVE backing from the population. That's no reason to invade and carpet-bomb the place with napalm and chemical weapons ( the same weapons you were just crying about Saddam using ).

      Of course, typical Americans; cleaning up after europe shits all over the place

      Hardly. It's more like MAKING all the shit and expecting everyone else to call it flowers.

      Abolishing slavery, abolishing monarchies, reinstating civil rights and real courts, cleaning up the mess left in the Middle-East by the English

      Oh fuck off. The US was built on slavery, and the remnants of it are still very much alive today. Abolishing monarchies? What do you call George Dubya, commander in chief? What's the point of abolishing something and replacing it with the same thing, but a different name? Why not try some democracy instead? Huh? And as for cleaning up the mess in the middle east, I believe you're FUCKING up the middle east. You must have a pretty warped idea of what's going on over there. You're American, right
    74. Re:Oh the humanity by vandan · · Score: 1

      If you really were in Fallujah during it's destruction, you would be dead. As for the rejection of the US's use of White Phosphorus, I've seen numerous videos by independent ( not 'embedded' ) journalists, and also head eye-witness reports of White Phosphorus use. There really is no reason for people to overstate US brutality in Iraq. If so many sources ( credible sources, mind you, not CNN & Fox ) claim it's happening, then I know who I side with. If you really were there, and you really didn't see it's use, then you are one lucky SOB.

    75. Re:Oh the humanity by FST777 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in the Netherlands, US cars are advertised on the radio by mentioning the continuing fall of the dollar in a news styled manner while cheering is heard on the background. I'm not joking.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    76. Re:Oh the humanity by vandan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Germany used slave labor including child labor through 1945 and France and the rest of the chest-thumping Europeans allowed it as long as Germany wouldn't attack. Europeans abolishing slavery before the US is false. Or did you conveniently forget that?

      1) The period of fascist control should be excused
      2) Germany doesn't represent all of Europe

      The Soviets used slavery until at least the mid 1960's.

      They weren't soviets. A 'Soviet' was a workers' council ( literally translated as peoples' advise ). What happened after Stalin came to power was nothing to do with the Soviets.

      Many in the Muslim world today have slaves. They are called women.

      That's just racist trash. There's not a single Muslim family I know where I'd say that the female was treated like a slave. But if I look at society more generally, I'd say that Western ideology includes treating women like slaves. For example, my wife is pregnant, and due to give birth in 1 month. She gets 1 year maternity leave, but it's all UNPAID. She, and all other women, are expected to take care of the baby and home generally, for FREE. Now sure, my income supports her ( just ). But not all women are that lucky. What's more, when she goes back to work, the wages she earns will be about 70% of a males' wage, not because she's less skilled or capable, but just because Western society treats women like that. I'm sure it's the same in your country. In fact, I'm sure you support this. So lets not bring out the racist BS while conveniently forgetting our own shit, OK?
    77. Re:Oh the humanity by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I have 12 patents in my name that have been issued in multiple countries

      Thief (patents are theft). I don't mean to speak on behalf of the GP, but a patent is not theft. A patent is the public documentation of how an invention works. You can argue that the enforcement of one's limited exclusivity on non-private use of a patented invention is theft, but a patent itself is not.
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    78. Re:Oh the humanity by cloneofsnake · · Score: 0

      Well said! Some people are just too narrow & short sighted! Still, I'm sure we're all familiar with the recent history of established US corporations resisting change to hang on to their old, established cash cows... we were ahead of the game for a while, and then we stayed stagnant while developing countries without the same "old" infrastructure surpassed us to walk right into the future... In a way, I guess falling back behind can be a good thing for the US. I wish I can live to see the US people overthrowing the existing power structure (the old money, the corporations & banks) and leap a giant step into the future again.

    79. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We are not producing goods. We are producing SERVICES; and they are EASILY replaceable. We need vertical markets. The really bad part of this is that we have allowed a country that is STILL in a cold war with us to do our goods. If they were not in a cold war with us, they would allow their yuan to float against all others. In addition, they would be building DEFENSES weapons, not offensive.

      We are in big trouble.

    80. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's mere pedantic sophistry, in the course of an informal conversation "patents are theft" is understood as "the enforcement of one's limited exclusivity on non-private use of a patent invention is theft".

      Jackass.

    81. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We no longer manufacture things in the US, basic big stuff like steel, etc. We just depend on buying it cheaper overseas....

      Here is a pop quiz that may be of help to you:

      1) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing output reach its all-time peak?

      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006

      2) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing revenue reach its all-time peak? (inflation adjusted)

      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006

      3) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing profits reach their all-time peak? (inflation adjusted)

      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006

      4) In what year did U.S. Manufacturing exports reach their all-time peak? (inflation adjusted)

      a. 1966 b. 1976 c. 1986 d. 1996 e. 2006

      5) Average annual compensation (wages + benefits) for US manufacturing jobs is

      a. $36,000 b. $46,0000 c. $56,0000 d. $66,000

      6) What are the relative sizes of the US and Chinese manufacturing sectors?

      a. China outputs 2.5 times the US b. Equal c. The US outputs 2.5 times China

      7) Which country produces the largest share of total world manufacturing output?

      a. China b. Japan c. Germany d. France e. US

      The answers if anyone cares about facts: 1-e,2-e,3-e,4-e,5-d,6-c,7-e Larry Kudlow, are you posting under the alias, homer_s?

      Look up:

      1. Hedonic adjustments
      2. Inflation (I noticed that you conveniently left it off a few of those and so did everyone else)
      3. Trends vis-a-vis U.S. share of global manufacturing, income, savings, wealth (have you seen the NIIP since the mid 1980s?)
      4. Growth

      I'm not sure what you hoped to accomplish by posting your unqualified "facts."
    82. Re:Oh the humanity by ccollao · · Score: 5, Insightful

      sort your own backyard first. Please, don't send them to south america again... We are finally doing ok, since the US Army is looking to the other way around. ;)

    83. Re:Oh the humanity by antic · · Score: 1

      "You are correct, the USA should immediately cease producing value added goods and produce iron ore and silicon."

      Already enough silicone in the USA!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    84. Re:Oh the humanity by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh no it couldn't be a natural part of the cycle, never. Must be the end of the US.

    85. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah and there where also stories of the big bad german soldiers eating children too..

      I wonder in what historic books you found this information.

      I just love this kind of dumb remarks.. 'shut up and be thankful because we liberated Europe from the axes of evil'
      While 1: The US was afraid that Germany would get atomic weapons first ( they didn't know how far the Germans where in developing those )
      They had no choice then to team up with the other allies
      2. They needed firm control against the evil communists.
      3. Europe became a big export market for the US after the second WW.

    86. Re:Oh the humanity by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      > Thief
      > Jackass

      Argumentation ad hominem = you lose.

    87. Re:Oh the humanity by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's not the tree huggers to blame for the US's industrial problems. The Europeans have even more stringent regulations than we do. The blame for the decline of American industry lies almost entirely with the labor unions that have made American labor completely unaffordable and companies using it completely uncompetitive.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    88. Re:Oh the humanity by wrook · · Score: 1

      It's funny how people think that selling natural resources is a good idea. I always think back to the days when I used to play empire. Most servers had a casual rule against "tech trading".

      With tech trading, one country would sell it's natural resources in order to buy high tech finished products from another country. Why was this practice banned? It's such a bad practice for the country selling it's resources. Not only do you not improve your own technology level, but you also become dependent upon a foreign source for goods manufacturing infrastructure. Countries who did this *always* made an early exit from the game (which made the game boring).

      Unfortunately, I come from Canada -- one of the richest countries in the world, resource wise. And one of the countries with the poorest infrastructure around. And people *still* say we don't need meat packing plants or sawmills because the Americans already have everything set up. Sigh...

    89. Re:Oh the humanity by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Also, while our European governments steal all our money for taxes, we use it for better things than throwing bombs at some desert...

      Perhaps you are using it to placate your Muslim immigrants?

    90. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most (if not all) logging operations are going to reseed regardless of what you say. It just makes sense financially. Despite that there is still a very vocal minority that seems to feel that corporations should not be allowed to have any impact on any environments at all. These same people use just as much wood and paper as anyone else, but never seem to see the hypocrisy.

    91. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You admit to having patents. You already lost.

    92. Re:Oh the humanity by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing: if you can't do things sustainably, then you really don't deserve to be living anyway. You don't have some God-given right to live...

      Yes! Almost, life unworthy of life, if you will.

    93. Re:Oh the humanity by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      You're numbers are off. Inflation has been mis-reported for a couple decades now, no longer taking into account many cost-of-living expenses because they are "too unpredictable and fluctuating." Things like gas and food, to name a few.

      http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-inflation-understated-due-trio/story.aspx?guid={DED8CC4C-8199-40E1-93F9-43A3C5E0F0D4}

      This is one of the reasons why our inflation numbers seem so low compared to other countries, yet the value of our dollar is dropping. There are other reasons, of course.

      You also have to look at the numbers in a per-person perspective. (per capita?) I'm curious if the numbers look similar, when you factor in population growth.

    94. Re:Oh the humanity by coopaq · · Score: 1

      Homer,

      It's like you are a terrorist trying to bring sense to all this economic fear mongering. You better stop it. People need to be scared shitless all the time.

      Now go buy some duct tape..

      btw: I think China's, Europe's and the US economy are all doing fine and hell... any country that produces anything useful is probably doing well.

    95. Re:Oh the humanity by coopaq · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post. I just opened Digg in a new tab.

      If you want to be terrorized and firghtened all the time just go read Digg. They think the world is coming to an end.

    96. Re:Oh the humanity by Wildclaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say that Western ideology includes treating women like slaves. For example, my wife is pregnant, and due to give birth in 1 month. She gets 1 year maternity leave, but it's all UNPAID. She, and all other women, are expected to take care of the baby and home generally, for FREE. Not all western countries are the same of course.

      Here in Sweden there is 480 days of paid parenthood. I am not sure how big percentage of the salary that is is.

      However, one interesting thing to note is that these 480 days may be distributed in any way between father and mother. This is relativly new, and one of the things implemented to decrease gender discrimination here in Sweden. It is a very good law. Not only does it help women who want to keep working. There are also many new fathers that would like to spend more time with their children.

      The biggest remaining gender discrimination here in Sweden is probably the wage gap which is hard to explain. There is work being done to reduce it, but it is hard without understanding the real reason for it. As you say, women aren't less skilled or capable, so how come they on average have lower salaries.

      Is it concious discrimination by those setting salaries, or maybe unconcious discrimination. Or are women less likely to ask for salary increases? Until we fully know the answer to those questions it will be hard to fix it.
    97. Re:Oh the humanity by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

      Try finding a Chinese made commercial airliner. Manufacturing output refers to the value of all goods manufactured in that country in US dollars.

    98. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Mr.!

      Giligans Island isn't shit!! Do ya got that little buddy!!!!!!!!

    99. Re:Oh the humanity by eli+pabst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they were not in a cold war with us, they would allow their yuan to float against all others The reason they want to peg the yuan to the dollar is financial. If the value of the dollar suddenly dropped to 1/2 the value of the yuan, then Chinese-made goods suddenly become twice as expensive to their largest market.

      In addition, they would be building DEFENSES weapons, not offensive. You realize that they have a minuscule navy that makes it impossible for them to project military power outside of their region, right? It's going to be a long ass swim from China before you need to worry about Chinese military aggression in this part of the world.

      There are plenty of reasons to be concerned about China, but neither of those are one of them.
    100. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going after Iraq for 9/11 isn't cleaning up after Europe.
      I was with you up until that part. You can't underestimate how many of the problems in the middle east are a result of the arbitrary lines the British drew around what were then desert tribes. When they left, instability and in-fighting were the inevitable result. The oil boom only intensifies this.

      Though in one sense, you're correct. 'Cleaning up' would entail making a positive difference rather than just stomping in, taking a huge dump on Iraq and calling it Democracy.
    101. Re:Oh the humanity by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Funny

      USian isn't a word.

    102. Re:Oh the humanity by homer_s · · Score: 1

      By that logic, shouldn't each household try to be self-sufficient? After all, what would happen if others decide one day not to sell anything to your family?

      Should Illinois take the same attitude and stop importing stuff from other states?

      And even if you have a good reason to think that the Chinese would stop selling you crappy toys, isn't it smart then to *conserve* your resources for that rainy day?

    103. Re:Oh the humanity by homer_s · · Score: 1

      Production is a cost, consumption is the goal. Otherwise, we should be complaining that the sun is providing us with cheap light and thereby stopping us from developing high intensity lighting systems.

      Maybe Obama will ban the sun "to create more jobs here in the greatest country in the world (which he will try to change)".

    104. Re:Oh the humanity by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah, but if you include social protection in your base tax, then you have to include SocSec and MediCare/MedicAid in the US tax rate, in which case military spending is third. That's right, the US spends over double what it does on the military on basic social welfare.

    105. Re:Oh the humanity by ravenshrike · · Score: 2

      Credible sources? Were the sources french perhaps? Cause those sources were sooo good at reporting the Jenin incident. ALL info from a war zone is incredibly suspect unless you can find at least 10 minutes of unedited footage that takes in the entire scene. As for 'eyewitness reports' well, ask 10 different witnesses who committed a crime and you'll get 10 different descriptions. And that's without assuming that some of them are trying to lie.

    106. Re:Oh the humanity by msromike · · Score: 1

      Adjust the numbers for us and show us what you mean. Otherwise it just sounds like more Anti-US unsubstantiated bullshit.

    107. Re:Oh the humanity by damasterwc · · Score: 1

      somebody mod this up +1

    108. Re:Oh the humanity by evilviper · · Score: 1

      When you count Britney Spears CDs, Windows, Bewitched and Gilligan's Island DVD box sets, etc. as "manufactured goods," yeah, we turn out a lotta shit.

      The software and entertainment industries are VERY, VERY TINY relative to manufacturing... Sub-sub-sub sectors of manufacturing are many times bigger than software or entertainment. There's no way they could possibly have a noticeable effect on such huge (multi-trillion-dollar) figures.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    109. Re:Oh the humanity by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Good job picking the most advanced manufacturing country in europe and comparing it to it's equivalent in the US.

    110. Re:Oh the humanity by msromike · · Score: 1

      Please show me how this is 1) flamebait 2) untrue. Flamebait my ass, 5+ insightful if anything.

    111. Re:Oh the humanity by Tom · · Score: 1

      Of course, typical Americans; cleaning up after europe shits all over the place. Abolishing slavery, abolishing monarchies, reinstating civil rights and real courts, cleaning up the mess left in the Middle-East by the English (I'd love to applaud the people who drew those maps up, geniuses amongst men they must have been to mix kurds, sunnis, and shias), and defending Europe as much as they could from facists, from communists. You still getting through doors?

      Driving out the fascists was about the only thing in the list that's correct. Especially your "cleaning up the mess" in the middle-east doesn't exactly work out too great, does it?

      If I was BMW I'd love to settle back in Detroit; You are aware of the fact that "BMW" stands for "Bavarian Motor Works" and Bavaria is a part of Germany which happens to be a part of Europe? Just asking...
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    112. Re:Oh the humanity by msromike · · Score: 1

      If they get cut off we will take them and kill anyone that tries to stop us. What's so hard to understand about that? History hasn't changed that much.

      It is nice to become temporarily enlightend by the droves of Europeans that frequent this forum. I can't wait until Europe solves all of the worlds ills. Maybe they can do it with a unified currency and an idealogically soliciazed bent.

      I love Europe, I wish I could afford to travel there more. It is noce to see what our ancestors were like before socialogical and economical decline. In the meantime I am going to fire up the propane gas heater, sit at my teak patio furniture, and smoke a cigar. If anybody tries to stop me they are in for trouble.

      Someday we will all need to speak Chinese but until them I am going to live it up.

    113. Re:Oh the humanity by shlashdot · · Score: 1

      "there is a significant number of them with this mentality, that I observer, that are preventing us from doing things...like drilling for our own oil off the coast of CA and FL."

      Yes, they are called the majority. Annoying, aren't they?

      --
      Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
    114. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does "My wife should be paid to have babies" get modded insightful?
      And how is that not institutionalized prostitution?

      As to the treatment of muslim women, you are either trolling or incredibly ignorant. No right to vote, can't hold office, can't move freely, no equal access to jobs. And you complain about a 30% pay differential? Guess what... the pay differential is largely caused by mothers taking part time jobs ("mother's hours") and maternity leave. This results in having less overall experience and therefore reduced ability to demand pay in the open market.

    115. Re:Oh the humanity by gfody · · Score: 1

      Mexico actually. Still the North American Union either way.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    116. Re:Oh the humanity by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      Nanny state programs robbing citizens of responsibility and liberty? Are you sure you're not talking about the U.S. here?

    117. Re:Oh the humanity by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wasn't there a thing where we were going to start counting fast food jobs as "manufacturing" recently?

      --
      This space available.
    118. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I who thought it was that the GDP per capita in the USA was higher than, I don't know, almost every country on the planet. And education and knowledge raising in poorer countries.

      That plus that maybe most americans still want to have the same or similair purchasing power even thought the dollar have droped a lot in value.

      And I doubt so much industry are moved over to Europe. We'll see where India and China is in 40 years, on the other hand in China I do guess that they politics can stop further development, or maybe not if noone cares about neither of the workers or environment.

    119. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Maybe Nintendo can sell "WiiBomb" or "WiiKill" (though the goal in wars aren't that much killing people longer, so it's more of a product name than suggesting anything) to the USA instead?

    120. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      "In Iraq there was a dictator who was a threat to neighbouring regions (and invaded its neighbours constantly), who testing chemical and biological weapons on his own people, who violated so many UN human rights charters" A dictator which USA helped getting there.

      A country which USA saw as a good one because it was closer to them / less arab(?) when the rest in the area.

      A country which USA told "it's ok if you invade Lebanon, we won't interfere."

      A country to which USA sold plans for sad weapons/industries.

      I have no idea what the English have done in the Middle-East, but yes, I agree with you in that England/Spain/any colonizing country have sucked balls. Regarding slavery and peoples rights I don't know if an american are the right one to speak though.

      But yes, it's nice to have someone fix some of the shit up in the world for free.
    121. Re:Oh the humanity by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      Except that the numbers for US Manufacturing, Profit, and Revenue for the years of 1966, 1976, 1986, 1996, and 2006 were never given. This is a lot of information to look up that the OP should have given. However, it's more dramatic to say "all-time highs!" than to let the numbers speak for themselves.

      All I was saying is that in any statistic about anything being adjusted by inflation, it's worth noting that the reported inflation has been lass than the actual inflation rate for a while now. The numbers are somewhat hard to find, but it seems to be generally about 50% more. I'm not about to go do the math any further, especially since I at least linked a source in my reply.

    122. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      May be true for slavery within EU, but England practised slavery in Africa until quite recent times.

      IG Farben in Germany had slave workers during the fourties - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben

      So I guess that depends, when I think of slavery I use to think about africans taken to america, but then those parts of america was "founded" by europeans and it was europeans who colonized africa.

      So not entirely true I guess. I have no idea how long slavery was still there in USA.

      (And imho USA are probably much better than many european countries aswell.)

    123. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I think part of his comments was about areas which they invaded and affected, not in their own country.

      But I doubt they did much of earlier in their own country when we did, but maybe they have for instance helped civil rights in another country where we europeans have not.

    124. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      cleaning up the mess left in the Middle-East by the English (I'd love to applaud the people who drew those maps up, geniuses amongst men they must have been to mix kurds, sunnis, and shias Was USA there when they decided that the jews should have Israel?
    125. Re:Oh the humanity by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      So your point being? Comparing Germany and California actually makes some sense as they have a roughly comparable population density and size. Comparing Germany to the US (as the parent post did) does not.
    126. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the us's strange infatuation with imaginary property laws that does it.",/i>

      Nothing strange about protecting a large segment of the economy. This surprises you?

    127. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 3, Informative
    128. Re:Oh the humanity by iwein · · Score: 1

      5) Average annual compensation (wages + benefits) for US manufacturing jobs is a. $36,000 b. $46,0000 c. $56,0000 d. $66,000

      How much is that in euro's?

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    129. Re:Oh the humanity by bytesex · · Score: 1

      It's not about the industries; you can make money in any way; it's about trust ! And that trust is gone as long as the US is seen as an unpredictable aggressor and an unfair competitor. And as long as it's losing billions a day on a war with no end in sight and no profit at the horizon. Get out of Iraq, get those spending habits under control, make your foreign policy predictable and you'll see the investors come running back.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    130. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      It really boils down to the need for nationalized healthcare. So make it happen? Can't be that hard?
    131. Re:Oh the humanity by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      How about first putting out elaborated arguments as to why getting into the Vietnam war was 'pointless' ?
      You can't use that as an assertion without justification.

    132. Re:Oh the humanity by Wheely · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please check your history. England was one of the first European countries to abolish slavery. THe principles of which were set in 1772. The slave trade did, however, continue particularly in the west indies despite a growing ant-slavery movement. These abolitionists even started buying large tracts of Africa in order to create free areas where potential slaves would be safe.

      The British completely outlawed the slave trade anywhere in the British Empire in 1807 under the punishment of death and also took action against African leaders who refused to accept the abolition.

    133. Re:Oh the humanity by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's going to be a long ass-swim from China before you need to worry about Chinese military aggression in this part of the world.

      There are plenty of reasons to be concerned about China, but neither of those are one of them. hyphenation FTW
      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    134. Re:Oh the humanity by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 1

      No you are incorrect! The decision whether to go with a labour-intensive or capital-intensive operations largely depends on local conditions. Nevertheless, labour intensive manufacturing processes tend to be cheaper (especially in rather mature industries such steel manufacturing). To prove my point, just look at the rust belt. Manufacturing is never coming back to the US! When you have 2 billion people living on next to nothing, there is no justification for hiring overpriced American labor. They kind of shit you need to do in a steel mill is not hard.

      I am not just taking this out of my ass you know. I live in the Mid-West, I am Ukrainian national (which means I go there pretty often) and my dad works in commodity import/export business (in Ukraine/Russia). His career depends on understanding this kind of stuff...

      Your smart location theory is interesting, but it's again incorrect. If you read up on IMF (or worldbank, I forget) reports on this issue, they are suggesting that in the worst case scenario the world might revert to a slightly more regionalist mode of operation. So even with increasing transportation costs (and in the long term transportation costs are approaching zero), manufacturing will simply be located in Mexico. However, I am even skeptical of the regionalist model, there are simply way too many benefits from globalization for people to just bail on it. Oil prices are increasing, so what? This only creates more incentive for us to find alternative sources of energy for transportation.

    135. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Here in Sweden we use them for getting foreigners here, pay for their living and homes and watch them burn it all down to the ground while preventing the police, fire men and ambulance workers do their thing.
      And because we like the idea of wasting money on them so much we like to be robbed by them, so much that they are indeed saying how easy to is because swedes are so lame and just give their stuff away instead of trying to defend themself.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whWgCOE56K8
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmftLK6EOQ0
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_ojXgCnfxQ

    136. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      As long as you fix the crap you've started first that may be ok.

      Or you know, we could let the UN decide what should be done and not and do it together instead?

    137. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1
    138. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't remember the guys name but I think it was in Kongo (?) where he played around during late 189x and if I remember correctly until 190x before someone but it to halt.

      I don't know much about the area but I was surprised it existed so close to "now", I thought things like that happened during 17xx or something.

      Anyway it was on TV just a couple of weeks ago, but I don't remember where and sure I may be incorrect about that it was someone from England, but if I remember correctly it was.

      Ohwell, googled a little but can't find what it may have been.

    139. Re:Oh the humanity by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Look at Norway. They do all of that, and vowed to be a carbon neutral state by 2020. THat's an aggressive goal if anything.

      The Norwegians make a fair bit of money on oil, but the oil company is state-owned, and is one of Norway's top investors in renewable energy research because they realize it's the only way forward once the damned stuff is actually all used up.

      I get very irritated by these market-proponents that claim "treehuggers" are responsible for the economic woes of the US. In the Netherlands, one of the parties that had the most solid economic planning in their manifesto for the 2002 elections were, funnily enough, the environmentalists. They were gunning for economic growth, fewer emissions and more conservation of nature in Holland all at the same time.

      From my perspective it is about time the world started paying attention to people with sound messages like that, because if we'll succeed in making this planet uninhabitable for humans one day, the shit will really hit the fan. For us, humans. Not for the planet itself. It will keep spinning long after we're all dead and decayed.

    140. Re:Oh the humanity by B2382F29 · · Score: 1
      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    141. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can blame a lot of problems in the middle east on the British, but the whole Saddam WMD administration rationale certainly isn't one.

    142. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Isreal sit next to the magical imaginary state of Isn'treal?

    143. Re:Oh the humanity by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 1

      As you say, women aren't less skilled or capable, so how come they on average have lower salaries.

      I don't know how it goes there, but I suspect it is similar to what happens in the US. There are a large number of housewives who have children older than grade school, who wish they had their own spending money and thus go out and obtain part-time or low-wage jobs for this, or for supplemental incomes while their husbands have been working in a specialized field, or doing more labor intensive work for the primary family income.

      I, for instance, have worked at a number of companies with women holding the same positions, making the same wages, as the men. What happens? They have children and take extended leaves or quit to take care of their kids. Multiply this by millions and you've got quite a gap when looking at the
    144. Re:Oh the humanity by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 1

      ...big picture.

      Not sure what happened there.

    145. Re:Oh the humanity by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      The biggest remaining gender discrimination here in Sweden is probably the wage gap which is hard to explain. There is work being done to reduce it, but it is hard without understanding the real reason for it. As you say, women aren't less skilled or capable, so how come they on average have lower salaries.

      Is it concious discrimination by those setting salaries, or maybe unconcious discrimination. Or are women less likely to ask for salary increases? Until we fully know the answer to those questions it will be hard to fix it. One of the factors in the difference in salary id that women are more prone to take parental leave for the child, take half-time work to have time with the children and refuse promotion to keep a less stressing position to be more available for the children. All of that adds up at the end of a career and create a very big salary difference. It is a social phenomenon where the women are more inclined or pushed to take care of the children at the cost of their career. And this cost reflect on their salaries it is not hard to find a reason of a salary difference.

      I have seen this with nearly all the women in my family. Having a full time in the beginning of their career, taking an half-time with their first child and for some completely stop. And when their child is ready for school or old enough to be more independent taking back an half-time job. And finally, taking a full time once the last child has leaved home. When you compare a career lake these one and the career of a man of my family who has worked full time from the first day to the last one.
    146. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I don't remember what the quote are from, I guess independence day, hitchhikkers guide, maybe aliens and such would fit but it can't be either of those. So wherefrom are it?

    147. Re:Oh the humanity by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I've seen more blue, pink and green lemmings when I've seen that other weird animal which was on that page. And the lemmings I've seen does indeed throw themself of cliffs, so I know what I trust more thank you!

    148. Re:Oh the humanity by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      You are right there is a point where we just will need to kill you because you are a cost to our society.

      Sound rough, yes? What about health care?

      The reality is that the problem is not the drilling of oil. The real problem is that people are so damm used to driving SUV's and wasting energy! THERE IS NOT NEED FOR A HUMMER!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    149. Re:Oh the humanity by Wheely · · Score: 1

      Well, it still happens now in the UK and elsewhere in Europe, mostly with Eastern European women. However, it isn't legal and if anybody gets caught they get in deep trouble.

    150. Re:Oh the humanity by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I think complaints about hurting forests are mostly about the rain forests which don't see as much care. People tend to burn them down to get fertile land for crops, exhaust that land and then burn more down.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    151. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still doesn't stop the American cars being ugly gas-guzzlers (compared to what the European and Asian manufacturers can put out)

    152. Re:Oh the humanity by Boetsj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep - the "low-dollar-weeks" at our Dutch Chrysler dealerships have been extended!
      ... let's just say I'd rather not drive a Daewoo ;)

    153. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you didn't know, "Maths" is short for "Mathematics".

    154. Re:Oh the humanity by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      It's from the Matrix

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    155. Re:Oh the humanity by Slimee · · Score: 1

      Ok seriously, I don't get this. This news post seems to have a lot to do with Nintendo shipping more to Europe due to a weak dollar... So why the fuck does half the comments have to do with the definitions of various parts of BRITLAND, and slavery. WHAT DOES SLAVERY HAVE TO DO WITH WII FIT BEING SHIPPING TO EUROPE. NOTHING!!! Can't you guys just for once stay on topic and not rant and rave about how awesome your country is, and how shitty your country is. Who cars! Let's talk about Wii Fit! So yeah...Wii Fit...crazy Nintendo

    156. Re:Oh the humanity by orasio · · Score: 1

      I second that.

    157. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider myself to be an environmentalist... MOST environmentalist don't say "Don't chop down trees" they say "Chop down what you need and reseed the forest, using technology that limits the impact on the surrounding earth". We can have both strong environmental policy as well as a powerful industry. But we need it ALL right NOW!
    158. Re:Oh the humanity by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      what are you doing with all those taxes?
      education

      We spend plenty on education. The problems with our education system are cultural. Maybe Europe spends more than we do. I have no idea. However, I don't think our education problems can be solved by throwing more money at them.

      Now can you show we spend less money on education per capita than europeans, or were you just implying Americans are stupid?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    159. Re:Oh the humanity by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      We no longer manufacture things in the US,

      Wow, that's incredible that the US can STILL be the largest manufacturer in the world while not manufacturing anything! If you want to stir up fear, uncertainty and doubt as least aim it at the truth, such as the declining amount of manufacturing in the US, not some sort of asinine statement that it doesn't exist anymore. Speaking from a person who works for a US manufacture who's products can be found in a Home Depot, Lowe's, and an endless number of wholesalers, just to name a few. Who's products are all stamped with "Made in America" and can be found in everyone's home.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    160. Re:Oh the humanity by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to buy a U.S. made car?

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    161. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women take more absences. It's a fact.

    162. Re:Oh the humanity by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      What those things mean is defined by the UN. For the UK, most of 'Social protection' is social security benefits, i.e. money given to the unemployed, families, retired people etc.

      Interesting. As a libertarian, I'd be for privatizing most everything for defense, and partially privatizing that. But at least I have a basis for comparison now.

      Jobseekers allowance is an interesting thing. I assume that's intended for job search expenses and not basic living, as I don't see how on 73.60 US Dollars a week. That's one social program I'd be in favor of considering for the US.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    163. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if you have no use for this kind of misanthropy ? Do you think reality will change just to accomodate your sensibilities ? Recognising that our species behaves like a cancer does not mean everyone should commit suicide, it's simply recognising a fact that threatens our's and our entire planet's survival. And that's the first step in actually starting to do something about it, like, you knwow, acheiving sustainable living maybe ?

      Or do you think burrying your head in the sand because you have "no use for this kind of mysanthropy" will automagically make the real problem go away ?

    164. Re:Oh the humanity by inKubus · · Score: 1

      I know that it's easy to make up excuses about the tree huggers ruining everything, but unfortunately sometimes you have to use your brain and think straight. Industrial production is never coming back to the USA! Not unless Americans are going to accept Bangladesh style wages/living standards.

      It's interesting you should say that. Almost all of the job growth over the past decade or so has been in construction and the "service industry". The service industry is just ancillary to the construction industry (ie: someone has to clean the houses, sell them, make loans for them, etc.). So the service industry is drying up. No one is going out to eat if they can't pay their bills. Anyway, if enough people lose their jobs here, the minimum wages they will take goes down. Because hey, it's better to work than not have a job at all.

      Of course, the money has all gone to the rich, and the government has printed so much of it that even more has just debased the currency. So, it's time to raise taxes and take the money back from the rich and give it to the people. They all know it's coming and they all plan for it. This is part of the regular US economic cycle. People here are just too thickheaded and don't see it, and those that do profit from it. So while everyone else was buying an Escalade and expensive drinks with their service industry income, some of us were planning ahead, working on our education and skills so that we could still work when the fall came.

      Hopefully crime doesn't go up too much because I'd rather see that new tax money go to the people and not the industrial prision complex..

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    165. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Or you know, we could let the UN decide what should be done and not and do it together instead?"

      Because the US may make decisions that are not in our best interests?

      This isn't a one world govt. yet.....so at this point, it is up to your govt. to try to 'win' for your country, and get the best of what it can to provide your citizens with the best level of living as possible. This is a contest.....always has been.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    166. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "a slave. But if I look at society more generally, I'd say that Western ideology includes treating women like slaves. For example, my wife is pregnant, and due to give birth in 1 month. She gets 1 year maternity leave, but it's all UNPAID."

      And exactly why should a company, in business to MAKE money...subsidize a woman having a baby? It is her choice to have one....and it takes time. This does not help a company's bottom line...why should they pay money for someone to miss a lot of work? Heck if they do this, as a guy...I need something comparable. How about giving me paid leave to take care of something I choose to do.

      Look...people, especially women with kids already get built in excuses to leave work all the time...I've seen them leave for 'female problems', they often have to leave to pick up a sick kid or when little Jimmy is out of school. They do not get penalized pay or vacation-wise for these times....yet, as a single guy with no kids...I get no such consideration.

      If you want equal pay and all....then expect equal treatment. You work, you get paid. You don't work...you don't get paid...simple as that.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    167. Re:Oh the humanity by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She gets 1 year maternity leave, but it's all UNPAID.
      If you're suggesting the government should pay her for full-time parenting for a year, I'd say that would be worth considering. However, people usually want employers to do it. Why should it be their responsibility to pay her for a year to not work (for them)?

      when she goes back to work, the wages she earns will be about 70% of a males' wage
      Probably less. It's women taking time off for childrearing that are bringing down the average, and you only get to the 70% by factoring the higher wages of women who don't do that.

      This is indeed sexism, but it's not from the employers; it's from individuals and their own views of women's and men's places in the world. Until men are sacrificing their careers for their children at the same rate as women, it's going to stay that way. The only thing I'd say is unjust from the employer side is when they assume a woman is going to put them second behind her children or want maternity leave, and she has no intention of having kids, or her husband will be doing most of that work.

    168. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      mod up, except for the crap about nationalized healthcare fixing it.

    169. Re:Oh the humanity by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I forgive you, considering your other way-off statements so far. Communists HAD taken over Vietnam, and had MASSIVE backing from the population.
      Even that's too charitable to us Americans. The Vietnamese took over Vietnam, needed to pick a government and economic system, and picked communism. As I understand it, it was more about ending colonialism (French) than establishing communism to them.

    170. Re:Oh the humanity by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's just racist trash.
      How can commenting on a certain aspect of a particular religion be considered racist, anyway?

      On a side note, GP is right. Do you know that Islamic law permits parents to force their daughter into marriage disregarding her opinion? Or that husband has a right to beat his wife if she disobeys him? And yes, it is the actual law in force in quite a few (Islamic) countries around the world.

    171. Re:Oh the humanity by CompSci101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK. I know I'm an American and all, but I could swear that Canada is, in fact, on top of the US.

      Don't try to further confuse my already small grasp of geography with your Canadian lies!

      C

      --
      The Sun is proof that we can't even do fire properly.
    172. Re:Oh the humanity by ombwiri · · Score: 1

      Jobseekers allowance is meant to cover basic living costs. Yeah sucks to be unemployed doesn't it? It is true however that you can claim other benefits if you are unemployed such as housing benefit (to pay rental costs) as well as getting money off your council tax (based upon the value of your residence). For all the talk of people sponging off the state it is rather hard to keep body and soul together on £50 per week.

    173. Re:Oh the humanity by sponga · · Score: 1

      Quote was from a field and artillery magazine and they even state that the white phosphorous is used to flush them out and later they use HE(High Explosives) to destroy the enemy. I heard they throw the babies up in the air and bayonet them as they come down.
      Great bloggers...

      "This line however crumbled when bloggers (whose influence must not be under-estimated these days) ferreted out an article published by the US Army's Field Artillery Magazine in its issue of March/April this year.

      The article, written by a captain, a first lieutenant and a sergeant, was a review of the attack on Falluja in November 2004 and in particular of the use of indirect fire, mainly mortars.

      It makes quite clear that WP was used as a weapon not just as illumination or camouflage.

      "WP proved to be an effective and versatile munition. We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes where we could not get effects on them with HE [High Explosive]. We fired "shake and bake" missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out," the article said.

      In another passage the authors noted that they could have used other smoke munitions and "saved our WP for lethal missions".

      A word about the term "shake and bake." Anyone with a family to feed in the US knows what this term, properly "Shake 'n Bake, means. Made by Kraft, it is a seasoning which is put into a plastic bag with chicken and shaken before before baking. Its use gives the article the smack of reality. It's the kind of thing US soldiers would say. "

    174. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know somebody working in a manufacturing/engineering facility building large machinery. They are backed up right now due to the huge number of orders from Asia and Europe due to cheapness of the dollar right now. We are producing goods cheaply.

    175. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China and India are putting out over 1 millions scientists and engineers per year each while American kids seem to have a growing sense of entitlement. We do drive the worlds tech economy but I can see that changing in my lifetime with the way we are raising our children.

    176. Re:Oh the humanity by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Europe didn't have slaves for the same reason the north didn't, their industries didn't benefit from cheap, unskilled labor you could work to death. Not because they were noble. As for being late to save Europe from Germany... again, maybe it wouldn't have been necessary if Chamberlain hadn't been such a pussy or if the war reparations hadn't destroyed what was left of Germany. As for the US abolishing slavery, it was pretty much an afterthought, not the goal. If the north had a use for it, it would have continued. The north used it as a rallying cry and to make the north feel better about killing fellow citizens. Funny how when the US learned its lesson about "problems there can become problems here" and "better to kill the cub now, than to have a lion on your throat later", Europe turned their backs on us (to preserve oil concessions signed with Saddam). Leaving the US (and a few token allies) and the Iraqi people swinging. Europe gets to have awesome social programs because the US *is* their defense budget. We could have free college and health care if we didn't have bases in every time zone.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    177. Re:Oh the humanity by fritsd · · Score: 1
      Obligatory Jared Diamond quote:

      p. 425 " Politicians use the term "creeping normalcy" to refer to such slow trends concealed within noisy fluctuations. If the economy, schools, traffic congestion, or anything else is deteriorating only slowly, it's difficult to recognize that each successive year is on the average slightly worse than the year before, so one's baseline standard for what constitutes "normalcy" shifts gradually and imperceptibly. It may take a few decades of a long sequence of such slight year-to-year changes before people realize, with a jolt, that conditions used to be much better several decades ago, and that what is accepted as normalcy has crept downwards. "
      Jared Diamond, "Collapse", ch. 14 "Why do some societies make disastrous decisions?", p. 425
      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    178. Re:Oh the humanity by glgraca · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as in the Iraq war, the threat in Vietnam was contrived. The Vietnamese were seeking independence from France and actually sought help from the US. The US on the other hand, was afraid of losing the French to the USSR, because De Gaulle threatened to switch sides and join the communists (and the US couldn't see through this stupid bluff). So the US went along and helped the French, and when the French saw they could not win, they left the US with a war against a people who should have been their ally to begin with. How stupid can it be for "The Land of the Free" to aid France (Liberté, ectera, ectera...) in a colonial war?? Lots more juicy details can be had in Barbara Tchumann's excellent "The March of Folly".

    179. Re:Oh the humanity by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      If you are going to bring up World War 2 then let's talk about how the US treated the Japanese.

    180. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Americans are always trying to push the idea that the North Pole has to represent the top of the map, well news flash! The whole world doesn't necessarily think the way you guys do!

    181. Re:Oh the humanity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Oops...I mean "Because the UN may make decisions that are not in our best interests?"

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    182. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ability to make money from one's own industry and not have it immediately stolen by the fella who happens to have more hired muscle allows capitalism to function. Get out of your basement and take a basic economics course... or at the very least, teach yourself to read and grab a book.

    183. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany has 82 million people. California has 36. The US has ~300. Comparing Germany to the US (3.7x population) makes almost as much sense as comparing California to Germany (2.3x population).

    184. Re:Oh the humanity by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Just like to add to the other comments that women take on different jobs than men. I suppose it depends on the statistics used, but I haven't ever heard a proper discussion of these factors when listening to politicians and popular media. If many women avoid engineering, the a lot of the money made in those jobs isn't going to land in women's pockets.

    185. Re:Oh the humanity by spindizzy · · Score: 1

      Well you can go with Robert Macnamara's (sp) take on it which was that it was pointless as the Vietnamese would never let the Chinese dictate to them having a thousand years of fighting against specifically that. The domino theory was thoroughly debunked. Had Kennedy not been assasinated you would have been out of Viet Nam in 63, he'd already made the order and it was only LBJs hawkishness and simplistic (mis)understanding of the situation (essentially he was from the all commies bad school) that left you embroiled there.
      It was a tragic and unnessecary farce in the end - and please remember for as much as the US moans about it, things were so much worse for the Vietnamese as a result. And still are!

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    186. Re:Oh the humanity by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      For all the talk of people sponging off the state it is rather hard to keep body and soul together on £50 per week.

      I'm sure there are those that make a job out of collecting the multiple forms of assistance as they do here in the states.

      So out of curiosity, what would a single room occupancy, or the typical living arrangement of a "working poor" person in your country cost in terms of monthly rent?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    187. Re:Oh the humanity by ombwiri · · Score: 1

      It depends on the area. When I lived in Bradford (north of England, quite deprived) you could find somewhere to live for about £200 ($390) per month, if you live anywhere near London you are looking at a minimum of £800 ($1550)

    188. Re:Oh the humanity by brkello · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on making yourself look like an ass and giving your fellow Americans a bad name.

      If you think some moron's comments on a web forum makes Americans look bad, then you aren't much better than the moron. Besides, our president makes us look bad enough all by himself...thank you very much.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    189. Re:Oh the humanity by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

      Why should I care where the car is being made or designed ? As long as I get safety and economy, German, French, Japanese or US makes no difference.

    190. Re:Oh the humanity by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      Ok, I didnt mean to write "some sense", but "a bit more sense". And California has a size and population density that is at least very roughly comparable to Germany. Same for the GDP (California: 1.7 Trillion USD, Germany: 2.9 Trillion USD as of 2006).

      Anyway, my original point was that the comparison of the OP didnt have any relevance whatsoever (apples and oranges).

    191. Re:Oh the humanity by everslick · · Score: 1

      politicans. not so sure about the "better" anymore, though.

    192. Re:Oh the humanity by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the guys name but I think it was in Kongo (?) where he played around during late 189x and if I remember correctly until 190x before someone but it to halt.

      I don't know much about the area but I was surprised it existed so close to "now", I thought things like that happened during 17xx or something. You might be talking about Tippu Tip, one of the last big slave traders from Zanzibar, who operated in Congo around the time Henry Morton Stanley claimed it for the Belgian king Leopold II, or more likely, you're talking about Congo Free State (Leopold II's ownership of Congo) and the attrocities committed there. According to some estimates, while Leopold II owned the Congo, the population dropped from 30 million to about 8 million.

      Considering that history, it's not surprising that country is still a mess.
    193. Re:Oh the humanity by actiondan · · Score: 1

      This map is interesting:

      http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=210

      Looks like Europe is increasing it's spending on education faster than the USA is.

    194. Re:Oh the humanity by BL08N0883N · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? Wii suck.

      --
      Jeff for President
    195. Re:Oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America is a continent, not a country.

      The US is a country filled with patriotic sheep called USians(Pronounced U-S-ians)

      Patriotism is akin to Racism and racism is high in the US.

      The world would do a whole lot better without them

      Signed,
      The Rest of the World

  2. So, does this mean by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that Europe won't recieve everything 4-12 months later than Japan and the US? Still waiting for SSB:B...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:So, does this mean by analog_line · · Score: 1

      Well, as far as the PSP goes (and I realize that it doesn't go all that far) you're already starting to get releases that are flat out not going to happen in the US. As just one example of a game I'm going to have to import that I never thought I'd have to, Breath of Fire III is released in English in the UK, but not here. I didn't think the PSP was that much bigger there than here, or that the Breath of Fire brand was in such decay in America that no one was going to buy it, but apparently that shift is starting to happen.

    2. Re:So, does this mean by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      that Europe won't recieve everything 4-12 months later than Japan and the US? Still waiting for SSB:B...

      You guys can have an accelerated release schedule as soon as you all agree to speak one common language. Translating a game's language resources into 2 or 3 additional languages takes some additional time.

      May I suggest Esperanto?

    3. Re:So, does this mean by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause SSBB has like what, dozens of words!

  3. Bush by Boronx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if this has anything to do with Bush running up trillions in debt and making everyone hate us?

    1. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I hate bush as much as the next person but if it wasn't bush it'd have been the other guy. The system is designed so that it's required that the spending always has to increase.

      National debt works like this:
      Treasury/Fed make federal reserve dollars and give it out as treasuries at interest.

      People get the interest over time and theoretically expect to get principle in the future. Now the Fed/Treasury control the money supply and have paid the interest for however many years, so much of that money they received has to be handed back. Where are they going to get the principle from? Creating more debt of course, which then also has to be paid back, and so on...

      All bush did was speed up the process, the whole thing has to break.

      Check out money as debt on google video.

      Maybe I won't have described the process perfectly correctly but to the best of my knowledge that's correct. Someone please correct me if it's wrong.

    2. Re:Bush by dvice_null · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > All bush did was speed up the process

      That is a very nice way to say "he doubled the national debt within few years".

    3. Re:Bush by Goaway · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cynicism is no substitute for insight: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

    4. Re:Bush by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "People get the interest over time and theoretically expect to get principle in the future. Now the Fed/Treasury control the money supply and have paid the interest for however many years, so much of that money they received has to be handed back. Where are they going to get the principle from? Creating more debt of course, which then also has to be paid back, and so on..."

      Sounds like a Ponzi scheme(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme), only this one is goverment sanctioned.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    5. Re:Bush by nuzak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Maybe I won't have described the process perfectly correctly

      ALL money based on an arbitrary valuation is inflationary. Backing it with a shiny metal provides something of a natural cap to inflation, but it's not like there wasn't hyperinflation when our money was "good as gold". In fact, banks were collapsing left and right throughout the 1800's when we were solidly on a gold standard.

      > Check out money as debt on google video.

      Certainly do so just for edification, but it's eye-rollingly bad stuff. Full of ominous conspiratorial whisperings, and a general emphasis on how evil the whole notion of debt is. How about thinking of it this way: debt is an added valuation on time. And time is about as universal a commodity as it gets.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Bush by nuzak · · Score: 1

      (not replying to myself this time)

      BTW, my previous comment shouldn't be taken as any kind of endorsement of the amount of debt we've run up. Debt isn't intrinsically bad, but let's say that our time has now become more than a little bit overvalued and due for a long and painful correction.

      Gah, mod -99234 offtopic.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:Bush by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      yeah, when the national debt gets too high compared to the GDP you get problems, less money to lend for example, higher inflation [weak dollar] and if it gets high enough the GDP gets the chair knocked out from under it leading to recession. As for the consequences of "everyone hating us" I would imagine that it might affect the balance between exports and imports, people boycotting american goods if that is occuring...

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    8. Re:Bush by jackharrer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's "slightly" more than your Money as Debt on youtube. I've passed through 2 tough years of economics, so I can assure you it's not so simple. Other thing is that debt is kept pretty stable in proper economy, it's wars and such that imbalance it.
      I suggest you start from Economics for Dummies as definitely you lack some knowledge.

      BTW: all references to "educational" materials on youtube should be classified the same as kittens on treadmill...

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    9. Re:Bush by maxume · · Score: 1

      It depends on if you take the government at their word that they are going to pay you back. The eventual intent in a Ponzi scheme is to not pay a bunch of people (after you generate attention by paying back the first several rounds).

      There is some reason to believe that the government will make good on its debts (though, the current weakness in the dollar surely has major creditors feeling a bit green).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:Bush by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wonder if this has anything to do with Bush running up trillions in debt and making everyone hate us?

      Well look at it this way.

      The government is the only entity that can effectively control the amount of currency in circulation. It is the only entity that can create and destroy money by fiat; it can print currency, it can create funds to lend to central banks, and it can destroy the money it created.

      The government takes money from you every year in April. Someone has to repair roads, pick up garbage, provide for the common defense etc. Asphalt, garbage trucks, and missiles cost money. The government prints this money and spends it. It's all OK because it picks your pocket, pulls out dollars, and destroys them to account for it. And you shouldn't complain because you get to drive on nice roads with no garbage or foreigners.

      What if they didn't take your money? That's what George W. Bush did. He figured you'd like him more if we skipped the part where the money comes out of your pocket and gets burned up in order to close the books on the services you receive from the government. So the money escaped your pocket (or at least your $300 consolation prize did), and suddenly all this money that had been spent paving the roads and collecting garbage was suddenly appearing at Wal*Mart for its second life, and it got spent a second time to buy more garbage, predominantly imported crap from overseas. Basically the government printed crap dollars, we spent them on imports, giving sellers overseas dollars that they promptly exchange for their own currencies. The currency exchange markets are quickly overwhelmed by dollars. These quickly end up parked in immense T-Bills held by foreign banks, who would like to unload them but cannot risk damaging their value by flooding the dollar markets with their own holdings. But the value of the dollar is deteriorating anyway, much to everyone's dismay- because dollars are the most widely held currency in the world. And we owe them to everybody. You see how awkward this is.

      Let's say now you're sitting on a loading dock with 500 Nintendos on pallets. Do you want to turn them into dollars? Heh heh heh heh heh.

      But the invisible hand has a way to correct everything. Maybe someday we can make our own Nintendos.

    11. Re:Bush by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "but it's not like there wasn't hyperinflation when our money was "good as gold". In fact, banks were collapsing left and right throughout the 1800's when we were solidly on a gold standard."

      Hyperinflation was Weimar Germany. If I remember correctly, the US banking crises of the Nineteenth Century (aside from the lack of the New Deal, since before then they happened every other decade or so) was the gold standard bringing about deflation. If the value of the money in your pocket goes down, it makes it easier to pay off your debts as the value of those debts decrease as well. But if the value increases, then suddenly your farm isn't worth the mortgage you took out on it.

    12. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's a nice way to say Bush was a complete dick, but it would have happened anyway, even if he wasn't.

      - the original poster

    13. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's a lot more complicated as that. Congress authorizes a budget deficit; the Fed auctions off the debt as treasury notes. Taxes pay back the interest & principal on the debt--no money is being directly created or destroyed here.

      Money IS created by debt, but the Fed is not the place the money is really created. It happens at banks. Banks are allowed to take your deposits and then lend out 90% of it. That effectively creates money--you have money in the bank, plus some other guy has your money paying his mortgage. The Fed uses its influence on the money markets to increase or decrease the amount banks can lend out, which affects the money supply & hence inflation. (However note inflation is more complicated than that still--commodity prices, which a fixed by the free market, play a big role.)

    14. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked for corrections, not a personal attack. All I got from that post is that you're better than me because you studied economics for two years. How about explaining where I'm wrong?

    15. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US wasn't solidly on a gold standard during that time and the greatest real inflation under a gold standard was when the spanish entered south america and even then it was over a much greater period of time that the prices doubled, more than a hundred years, not eight.

      Bad businesses will always go under, as they should.

      And it's more of an added *de*valuation, if inflation increases at 5% per year, that means the money you have saved is worth 5% less at the end of the year. That's then compounded over years.

      That is the reason fiat currencies always lose value while gold from centuries ago still has value.

    16. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "BTW: all references to "educational" materials on youtube should be classified the same as kittens on treadmill..."

      sigh.

      the source of knowledge doesnt invalidate the knowledge. if tomorrow every english math book says 2+2=5, and i find a hitler youth math book that says 2+2=4, should i flat out reject the information based on the source?

      the fact of the matter is, you can find tons of good and true information from tons of different sources, and to say that one source is ALWAYS incorrect is almost always wrong (notice my 'almost'?)

      if one website i find says 2+2=5, i can do a little research on my own and find out if that holds true or not.

      and by the way, being a student of economics of course you wouldnt see it as being that 'simple'. the end effect is the same, and your education may actually be a stumbling block preventing you from seeing that.

      anyway, why am i even wasting keystrokes on /. anymore.

      there are bigger issues at hand, and most of this is being done to keep you from seeing what that is.

      "Other thing is that debt is kept pretty stable in proper economy, it's wars and such that imbalance it."

      my friend, it is you that needs to do some reading.

      if you would like a history lesson on how our banking system was created and who it benefits:
      http://www.pacinst.com/terrorists/preamble.html

      if you would like to actually read something that matters and has broader implications for your life:
      http://www.pacinst.com/efh/preamble.html

    17. Re:Bush by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      All bush did was speed up the process, the whole thing has to break.

      And all murderes do is speed up the process, the people have to die. And all bombs do is speed up the process, the objects were going to collapse into disorder eventually thanks to entropy. And that's without challenging the basic assumptions that you made...

      Treasury/Fed make federal reserve dollars and give it out as treasuries at interest.

      The Treasury can certainly issue T-bills as treasuries with an interest, but this is not federal reserve dollars. Dollar bills aren't printed and added willy-nilly to the economy, currency is used to replace currency and exchanged for transfers of credit.

      The federal reserve ss basically the country's bank. Banks are required to deposit X% of their deposits in the federal reserve (i.e., they cannot loan it out.) The federal reserve then pays Y% interest on that money (this is what the chairman of the Fed does, raises/lowers that rate, the "prime" rate.) Banks are then free to loan out the rest of the money. This causes the "money supply" to be higher, that is, there is more money, but offsetting personal debt. This is generally seen as a good thing. It adds liquidity to large assets (e.g. houses, cars) by increasing someone's access to money in the short term by allowing them to repay it over time. Other people then can save their money by loaning it out to the person making a purchase. Banks sit in between and run the logistics, as well as combining the various loans so that the risk of defaulting is spread out accross all the depositors. The FDIC then spreads this risk (up to a point) among the entire nation, so that you never have to worry about a bank collapsing and you note getting back your money (up to a point.).

      . Now the [treasury has] paid the interest for however many years, so much of that money they received has to be handed back. Where are they going to get the principle from? Creating more debt of course, which then also has to be paid back, and so on...

      This could be true, but it doesn't have to be. It could be that the loan was taken in a way to pay off an unexpected expensive over many years, much like a house. WWI/WWII definately saw the debt explode under this rationale. Another would be, like a business, that money could be used to invest in future productivity and thus more revenue later. This approach is most starkly seen with Reaganomics, but is also seen with education, job training and other projects (In fact, this exact rational was used in the ninties to expand some job placement/unemployment services). Revolving debt, as you describe, does not have to be a spiral to infinity. If the interest plus Z was gathered as revenue, then then the next round of financing sees the principle decline by Z. Further, given inflation, the real value of the principle will decline when Z is zero, or even for some negative values. Lastly, revolving debt has other benefits (Alexander Hamilton called the national debt the "national blessing".) It provides citizens a safe way to save their money. It maintains a good credit rating for when it is needed. It serves to smooth out lean and fat years.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    18. Re:Bush by Aeron65432 · · Score: 1
      You guys are both wrong. Believe it or not, but Bush directly should have caused appreciation of the USD. I'm no fan of Bush, but both of your comments are trolls. In economics, a high national debt actually causes a massive influx of foreign investment, thus causing the currency to appreciate. Why? Because government debt increases competition for savings, and thus the interest rate increases, making the country more attractive to invest in.

      Why isn't this true? Because the amount of dollars out there is increasing much faster than any real appreciation. Not only has the Fed had a pretty loose monetary policy in the last decade (housing bubble, anyone? caused by too much "cheap" money/loans) but with the increased use of Debit/Credit cards in the US, people are taking out less cash. That means for all the average Joes out there like me who carry $40-50 on them, we take money out less often and banks thus can loan out more money. So blame the banks and the Fed for the steep decline in the US, but Bush+Debt (Democrats are responsible for letting him get away with it, as the Republican Congress is too) is not the real culprit.

    19. Re:Bush by jackharrer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it didn't meant to be an attack. I've just seen tons of references to this "Money as Debt" on youtube, and I just got enough of it. Sadly it happened now.
      It's even classified in total bottom of charts at IMDB. It's full of misrepresentations and half-truths that fit somebody's agendas. I wouldn't recommend it to anybody.

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    20. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congress authorizes a budget deficit; the Fed auctions off the debt as treasury notes. Taxes pay back the interest & principal on the debt--no money is being directly created or destroyed here.

      Wrong, wrong and wrong.

      Well, OK, you got the first part right. The US government is (deeply) in debt. After that, though, you've got some serious confusion going on.

      It is the US Treasury that initially borrows money from the general public to cover the government debt. Then, the Federal Reserve prints up a bunch of new money out of thin air and uses that money to pay off some of the money that the US Treasury owes to the general public. Because these are "open market" transactions, the US Treasury now technically owes money to the Federal Reserve. What happens is that the US government taxes the Federal Reserve (and puts the taxes in the US Treasury) just enough to cancel out the debt between the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve.

      The upshot of all that is that the US government has printed up a bunch of money out of thin air to pay back (some of) the debt it owes to the general public.

      This process is actually somewhat automatic in that the Federal Reserve sets a target interest rate and then prints up just exactly the right amount of new money to maintain the target interest rate. The take home lesson is that when the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates it is actually printing a bunch of new money out of thin air - and somewhere down the pike all that new money is going to cause massive inflation.

    21. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush does not give a damn for what happens with Joe Sixpack, he only executes what is decided by his powerful and very rich friends. And they represent not more than 1% of the USA population.

    22. Re:Bush by mrlibertarian · · Score: 1

      ALL money based on an arbitrary valuation is inflationary.

      What are you talking about? The value of money, like all goods, is based on supply and demand. There is nothing "arbitrary" about supply and demand. Second, money is not inherently inflationary. During most of the 1800's, prices generally fell, just as we would expect with a relatively fixed money supply and an ever-increasing supply of goods.

      In fact, banks were collapsing left and right throughout the 1800's when we were solidly on a gold standard.

      Fractional reserve banks will often collapse under a "gold standard", because fractional reserve banks, by definition, issue claims that are not backed by any metal. Sadly, people have always blamed a fixed money supply for their economic woes, instead of accepting that money, like all goods, is scarce. Thus, bank runs were "fixed" in the 1900's, not by abolishing fractional reserve banking, but by preventing people from reclaiming their own property. But, just because bank runs are gone, that does not mean we have finally obtained that mythical "free lunch". In modern times, prices always increase, because the money supply constantly increases, and every "boom" created by the federal reserve is always followed by a "bust".

      I can't explain everything in this one post, however. If you want to know more, click here.

    23. Re:Bush by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      And that's the other side of the US's problems - long-term traditionally low interest rates have crippled its ability politically, socially, and economically, to raise interest rates beyond a certain low threshold. Ain't nobody going to invest in the US when they can go elsewhere for higher interest rates and a booming economy.

      Want to turn your economy around? Get ready for interest rates that you'd consider 'crippling', and the rest of the world would consider 'normal'...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    24. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Bullshit Bush; it was okay for Reagan to spend loads of money in peace time because we were preparing for "Star Wars" against an alien attack, right? Not the same difference, LOL! I'm just kidding on this. Aliens don't exist ( unofficially ) but ICBM's sure as hell do!

    25. Re:Bush by mentaldrano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's so bad about inflation? As long as it's controlled, consistent, and reasonably low (1-4% per year), the net result is simply a tax on hoarded money. That's a GOOD thing.

      Wealth isn't money - wealth is money changing hands! Any money that's just sitting around is a net drain on the economy, and makes it harder for the central banks to manage things. Money must be invested to be useful - even a savings account is useful.

      Besides, inflation hurts the rich way more than the poor, as long as the minimum wage is adjusted properly. That it hasn't been doesn't mean the whole idea is bad.

    26. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which isn't necessarily bad. All money is debt. Every single dollar bill in your wallet is debt.

      A dollar bill represents an IOU which you can exchange for goods and services you need. If someone somewhere didn't incur debt, they could not have given you that dollar. Without money the economy collapses, which means we'd basically go back to doing everything ourselves, i.e. subsistence farming. Not something you'd want to do, right?

      As we rely on more and more goods and services from other people, we rely more on incurring debt. Which is good because trade promotes efficiency.

    27. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with using gold as money is two fold:

      1. There's not enough of it in the world to support the world economy.
      2. It takes gold out of the market for raw materials, so that of instead of it be used for something useful like electronics or jewelery, it's hoarded under people's beds.

      Not to mention gold-backed money caused the Great Depression (see point #1).

    28. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Posting as AC because of modding)

      Well, first of all, much of the video is correct, but badly interpreted.

      Money is debt, but it is not fictional, money created today by loans is just an advance payment on value created later, interests being the added value that being able to spend today the money that you will win in the future. Think about it for a second, I lend you money so you can buy a house, I've just created value for you since you are able to enjoy a house well before you can actually afford it.

      The biggest mistake in this video is the assumption that value somehow represents a solid good, mistake that has been made over and over in the history of economics (from the physiocrats to communists). Value is not a tangible asset, never has been, never will be. You have to think of value in the same sense as the concept of energy in physics, value in itself is merely an expression of the potential benefit of any given asset.

      What the fractional reserve requirement system offers is the ability to convert the potential value that exists in the economy into tradable notes. Banks don't win money on the fact that they create money, they win money by converting long term potential value into short term tradable currency; this in turn allows the person "lending" money to benefit from his personal potential to create value in the future.

      Think this is bad? It's not, it's actually incredibly profitable for everyone, because market mechanisms make it so that the interest paid are equal or inferior to the value gained from being able to access such a credit, for the simple reason that if it were not the case, the borrower wouldn't take the loan.

      As a matter of fact, not only does the fractional reserve requirements allow people to convert future potential into present benefits, it also allows people to realize their future potential, since realizing future potential is often linked to being able to lend today.

      Now inflation, some people see inflation as a flat tax on cash, but this is completely false. As shown in the video, the whole economy relies on debt, inflation makes that money borrowed in the past becomes cheaper to repay, hence the flat tax that people are talking about is actually making it cheaper for people to convert their future potential into present benefits. What inflation does it that it prevents hoarding (to a certain extent), this makes that the potential "value" of the economy is either used through consumption or is lent so that other people are able to convert their future potential into present benefits. What inflation essentially makes is make for a better use of past, present and future value created by our societies, benefiting everyone.

      No or negative inflation (deflation) is incredibly bad, because it gives no incentive whatsoever to properly allocate the value created by the society (whether this value is created or potential), this means that value cannot be turned into more value for the society, making the society stagnate or regress.

      Too much inflation is also bad, but that's another topic; but it's the reason why central banks have target inflation rates (whether it has a fixed limit like the ECB's low but close to 2% or a fictional limit of "sustainable" inflation).

      In short, the video "Money as Debt" is mostly correct, only its interpretation of the consequences of our monetary system is completely flawed, but even worse, its interpretation of what "value" is is at odds with reality, but this is certainly not a stupid mistake, as some of the most brilliant economists (including Karl Marx) have fallen in the same trap during the construction of modern economics.

    29. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system is designed so that it's required that the spending always has to increase. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the national debt decreasing before Bush Jr took office?

      Also, why does it have to work that way? There are plenty of states where it is in the law that the state budget cannot exceed its income.
  4. If you think this country's bad off now by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Just wait 'til I get through with it ...

    --
    What?
    1. Re:If you think this country's bad off now by smaddox · · Score: 1

      I think you meant to say:

      If you think this country is bad off now, just wait until I've fixed it.

    2. Re:If you think this country's bad off now by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Go back to bed, Obama.

  5. Language barriers by tepples · · Score: 0, Troll

    Still waiting for SSB:B... Then make Esperanto or some other single language official throughout the European Union. Translating text, graphic text, and voice acting into a half-dozen or more languages costs money and takes time.
    1. Re:Language barriers by EvilNTUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or how about just initially releasing it in English for the vast majority of gamers who simply want to play the game? Even weirder is how the games are delayed even in those European countries that don't get a localized version.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    2. Re:Language barriers by Splab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, in most countries in the EU the target audience does speak a fair amount of English anyways.

    3. Re:Language barriers by davolfman · · Score: 1

      That said there a vocabulary quirks like "spaz" being offensive in England. So at least a little localization may always be necessary.

    4. Re:Language barriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. Few people speak English in Europe, except in a few countries like the Netherlands. You probably just hang around with English speakers only and don't see the reality.

    5. Re:Language barriers by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      This depends on what country you're in, here in Sweden most people speak english well enough that until recently few games were translated to swedish, to this day many of the big titles (guitar hero, gta series, WoW and lots of others IIRC) are not available in swedish versions, yet we have to wait until the release of the versions of games translated to german and french before they're released, in english, here.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:Language barriers by MemoryDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I beg to differ. Few people speak English in Europe, except in a few countries like the Netherlands. You probably just hang around with English speakers only and don't see the reality. Pretty much everyone in central northern and western europe speaks english to some extent. The only exceptions probably are southern spain, rural france and probably southern italy. Eastern europe is pretty well equiped, people learn english like crazy there you might get a problem in rural areas but definitely not in cities.
    7. Re:Language barriers by Endo13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, about 95% of Europeans who play video games.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    8. Re:Language barriers by vidarh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I've traveled quite a lot in Europe over the last 25 years, and yet I've never had a problem finding people who speak English everywhere I've gone. Now, if they don't like you they might not want to speak English to you, but the trick to avoid that problem is to not act like an arrogant prick, and ideally to try to speak the local language, however limited your skills are, first. I find trying to speak the local language works everywhere in the world - when you do people tend to fall over themselves trying to be friendly and helpful, and suddenly people put a hell of a lot more effort into speaking understandable English to you.

      It's been 15 years since I last came across anyone in mainland Europe that didn't speak any English at all - a very helpful French shop owner in a tiny town in Provence that, when he realized we were talking past each-other with my limited French, stopped a couple of random people who were passing by his shop and got them to translate.

      On my last proper visit to Paris a couple of years ago it had been 12 years since last time I'd spent any amount of time there (I'd been on a couple of business trips where I spent 3-4 hours in town and then went back to London) in fact, I find it hard to practice my French as contrary to my last holiday there every French person I came across switched to English the second I had problems finding the right word, or butchered their language too much (my French teacher used to say that the one thing you should always make sure to get right in France is the sounds - if you pronounce things correctly you'll get away with almost anything - so far I think she's been right)

    9. Re:Language barriers by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Or how about just initially releasing it in English for the vast majority of gamers who simply want to play the game?"

      Is that legal?

    10. Re:Language barriers by rubah · · Score: 1

      well, funny you mention esperanto. The boat tours in Strasbourg offer it as an option on the audio guide :] (along with several other options, but it still made me giggle when I realized)

      I guess they're working on it!

    11. Re:Language barriers by Wavebreak · · Score: 1

      Gamers do. I'm sure it does depend on country, and I can personally only vouch for Finland, but I'd put money on most gamers understanding English far better than the general population.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    12. Re:Language barriers by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      This is far from a Troll. I work for a company that ships to multiple countries within Europe. The cost of translating user manuals is insane and takes far longer than you would think.

    13. Re:Language barriers by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a HUGE difference between "somehow able to communiate in English" and "being able to enjoying an english piece of media"

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    14. Re:Language barriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That think is what you!

    15. Re:Language barriers by Thowllly · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a HUGE difference between "somehow able to communiate in English" and "being able to enjoying an english piece of media" Yeah, but probably not the way you think... It's much easier to learn enough to understand a language, than it is to communicate in it.
    16. Re:Language barriers by Slothy · · Score: 1

      Well, because when you release a game you advertise it. If you've going to release English now and localized versions later, then you either need to have two advertising campaigns or one of them won't get any advertising. For this reason, you time your releases so they come out at once and you advertise across the many European countries simultaneously so you don't spend so much on advertising that your game won't ever break even.

    17. Re:Language barriers by kitgerrits · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, it is in most countries.
      Just not in some...

      At worst, stores have to put on a sticker, warning customers that the product has no translation.

      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    18. Re:Language barriers by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      That's bullcrap and you know it. I played Space Quest 1 back in the day with a English-Dutch dictionary. I pretty much *learned* English by playing Sierra Quest games.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    19. Re:Language barriers by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      but the trick to avoid that problem is to not act like an arrogant prick

      It's been my personal experience that it's the European nations that hold the world's most arrogant (and condescending) people. Americans on the other hand hold the world most bombastic. There *is* a difference between being arrogant and bombastic.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    20. Re:Language barriers by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      There is a HUGE difference between "somehow able to communiate in English" and "being able to enjoying an english piece of media" I am british so I speak english pretty well as it is my first language. Most non-english europeans I have spoken to learned to speak english by digesting our media actually. British pop music such as the beatles, rolling stones, etc drove an entire generation to gain a very good understanding of english.

      I could also pop out and but a wii tomorrow as there is no shortfall here at all.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    21. Re:Language barriers by kjots · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your experience is obviously as limited as your intelligence (see, we can be pretty condescending down here in Oz too. I mean, "bombastic"? C'mon!).

    22. Re:Language barriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and those who are unable to enjoy an english piece of media should be the ones waiting 4-12 months for a translation, by themselves, rather than forcing the rest of us who'd be happy to have it in english sooner wait too

    23. Re:Language barriers by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Sure, they do that occassionally.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    24. Re:Language barriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from spain, and I can tell you that what is really difficult is to get the same level of effort in the communication from the english native speakers. They normally tend to think that you have to speak CORRECT english, and everyone else is a moron.

    25. Re:Language barriers by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      There is a HUGE difference between "somehow able to communiate in English" and "being able to enjoying an english piece of media"
      I suppose that depends how well you need to understand it. I speak maybe 30 words of Spanish, but I still think Shakira just sounds wrong in English.

  6. But... Wii Ain't Fit over HERE! by joocemann · · Score: 5, Funny

    Europeans are already fit! Wii need it here so we can earn our dubba-chee!

    1. Re:But... Wii Ain't Fit over HERE! by sponga · · Score: 1

      Prove it in the Olympics....

      cheers

    2. Re:But... Wii Ain't Fit over HERE! by xaxa · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Summer_Olympics_medal_count#Medal_count

      The USA got 36 gold medals.
      Cumulative total, country, country total:
      13 Germany 13
      24 France 11
      34 Italy 10
      43 Great Britain 9
      52 Ukraine 9
      60 Hungary 8
      68 Romania 8
      74 Greece 6
      79 Norway 5
      83 Netherlands 4
      87 Sweden 4
      90 Spain 3
      93 Poland 3
      95 Belarus 2
      97 Austria 2
      99 Slovakia 2
      101 Bulgaria 2
      103 Denmark 2
      104 Czech Republic 1
      105 Croatia 1
      106 Lithuania 1
      107 Switzerland 1
      108 Belgium 1
      Latvia, Portugal, Finland, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovenia, Estonia, 0

      But that's not really fair, since that's a bigger population. Olympic medals per capita?

    3. Re:But... Wii Ain't Fit over HERE! by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Olympic medals per capita? That isn't fair either. Smaller countries get more competitors per capita, which makes it more likely for them to score gold medals. (unless you assume that competitors always perform at their maximums)
    4. Re:But... Wii Ain't Fit over HERE! by joocemann · · Score: 1

      I wonder what will come of the Olympics when we have our inevitable unified world government.

  7. Bah Humbug by neokushan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate how Europe always gets shafted, especially when it comes to gaming.
    Rarely do we ever get a title released here first, even titles that were developed here tend to get released in the USA first.
    What's more, Nintendo, Sony AND Microsoft have all indicated that they don't care for Europe.
    Sony is probably the worst offender, by giving us a stripped down PS3 at nearly twice the price as the US and Japan (There's only so much "tax" and "import costs" can account for).
    Rock band is actually cheaper to import from the US than it is to buy in the shops (it's almost twice the price when you buy the set and the game!). This is really nothing new, but it's still infuriating the way we get treated.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:Bah Humbug by Stevecrox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely with this, Rock Band was released in the USA more than 7 months ago because activision want to make an extra buck (by selling exclusive rights to xbox360) I have to wait an unknown number of months before I get the privilage of buying it on the PS3. Not only that but the cost of the game is greater than twice the american version (its normally double) In America you complain about a $450 console, how do you feel about paying ~$350 (£140) for a game?

      Its pretty much for those two reasons, I won't be purchasing Rock Band. I still can't like th Wii (games are far to simple and easy for me) but hopefully this will start a trend where the gaming companies actually start to care for Europe.

    2. Re:Bah Humbug by neokushan · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you're saying, but just so you know, Activision does Guitar Hero, it's Harmonix/EA that does Rock Band (Harmonix did Guitar Hero 1 and 2, though, so it's easy to get confused).
      Also, have you considered importing the PS3 version? You'd get it now and it'd still be a lot cheaper than in the stores. Plus you have the knowledge that EA only got what they charge for in America for it, not the stupid price you'd pay here (the rest goes to whoever is willing to ship it).

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    3. Re:Bah Humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Europe is 500 million relatively rich people, it's loaded with cash (even more than Japan or the USA) and still, we get the games later than everyone, we get the electronic devices for silly prices (see iPhone, best example... Not that I want one, but the pricing is ludicrous). Given how powerful Europe is, I don't understand why everyone keeps thinking of us as second-class customers, it's very annoying.

    4. Re:Bah Humbug by Tweenk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot is no better at European discrimination. I wanted to post a whiny comment about expensive Lego bricks in Europe, but some dork at /. decided to stay with ISO-8859-1 and this prevents me from using the Euro sign.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    5. Re:Bah Humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, at that price you might buy fender and learn to play.

    6. Re:Bah Humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Watch out, you're making government laws controlling reproduction seem necessary.

    7. Re:Bah Humbug by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I know you're being facetious, but try € (€)

    8. Re:Bah Humbug by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that if someone gets clever and figures a way to get you Europeans your electronic goods sooner and cheaper, they'll be sued to oblivion.

      This (and not the CD rootkit fiasco) was the reason I started boycotting Sony products a looong time ago.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    9. Re:Bah Humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww that inferiority complex of yours (which seems to be pretty common to Europeans) is really gonna hurt you and only you in the long run. I recommend you let it go.

      As a side benefit, you won't feel the need to post so many "America sucks" posts in the future. We all win!

    10. Re:Bah Humbug by CoriolisSTORM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You wanna talk about getting shafted, try buying a decent Volkswagen over here in the states.

    11. Re:Bah Humbug by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      OK, but why numerical entities aren't supported?

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    12. Re:Bah Humbug by xaxa · · Score: 1

      How did you get £140 to be $350? It's $275.
      Still, £130 = $256 (UK RRP) is a big increase on the $170 (US RRP) in the US for the same thing.

    13. Re:Bah Humbug by neokushan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Raise the VAT Tax? The Value Added Tax Tax?
      So THAT'S why we're getting ripped off so much, we're actually getting taxed twice as much!

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    14. Re:Bah Humbug by Buran · · Score: 1

      In what way? Never had a problem with any of mine. Currently loving a 2007 GTI.

      Features? I'll admit I'd like to see some of the engine choices make their way over here, but VW has gotten a lot better about letting us have some of the stuff that used to be Europe-only. Navigation, for example.

      Now, if they would bring the Polo -- now's the time for a sub-Golf-sized car that gets the fuel economy to match.

    15. Re:Bah Humbug by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Sony is probably the worst offender, by giving us a stripped down PS3 at nearly twice the price as the US and Japan (There's only so much "tax" and "import costs" can account for). Rock band is actually cheaper to import from the US than it is to buy in the shops (it's almost twice the price when you buy the set and the game!). This is really nothing new, but it's still infuriating the way we get treated.

      It does seem to be an unwritten rule that electronics must be priced much higher in Europe than in the USA. That's where the article is leading: since profits are so much higher in Europe, Nintendo is sending more of its limited production in that direction.

      What is not explained is why they don't increase their prices in the USA.

    16. Re:Bah Humbug by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Raise the VAT Tax? The Value Added Tax Tax?
      So THAT'S why we're getting ripped off so much, we're actually getting taxed twice as much! Having run out of other things to tax, they're now taxing taxes.
    17. Re:Bah Humbug by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      I believe the RRP price is £170 which is approximately $350 (using the simple $2 to £1 conversion), I agree you can purchase it for around £140 in most places.

  8. This does not make sense by Chapium · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If there is such strong demand, why not raise the price?

    1. Re:This does not make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would make sense, except that the console market is not a free market.

    2. Re:This does not make sense by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good question. Nintendo is losing quite a bit of money by not raising the price of the Wii to match market demand. I think in the U.S. people are too used to seeing the price of electronics fall yearly, but with our rapid inflation rate, that's not going to happen anymore.

      Nintendo should just go ahead and silently raise the price a little. Sure, there will be some anger but I don't think it would hurt their brand very much. They could always just say "because of the weakening U.S. dollar..." and I think people would get the point. Heck, even U.S. companies are doing that now.

    3. Re:This does not make sense by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Ding! It's controlled by three separate, yet intertwined virtual monopolies.

    4. Re:This does not make sense by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      Nintendo should do you guys a favour and release wii fit at discount prices to get your fat asses in shape.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    5. Re:This does not make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think in the U.S. people are too used to seeing the price of electronics fall yearly, but with our rapid inflation rate, that's not going to happen anymore.

      Are the European people any different?

    6. Re:This does not make sense by sponga · · Score: 1

      Why so we can whoop you guys in the Olympics every year.

      Lay off the maple syrup there little kanuck.

    7. Re:This does not make sense by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Nintendo should just go ahead and silently raise the price a little."

      notrly

    8. Re:This does not make sense by NothingMore · · Score: 1

      Raising the price a little will put it at the same price as the Xbox 360 Arcade Edition. By doing this Nintendo loses one of its biggest marketing advantages of it being cheaper. I also believe you vastly underestimate how angry people would get by a price hike since a majority of people will look at is as price gouging.

    9. Re:This does not make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the US pharma is still top-rate :)

    10. Re:This does not make sense by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      only way they could break even to the pal taxed countries would be to raise it a very non-trivial amount. e.g. AU wii is $400AU or $385 US, even if they raised it to $350US it would be making less money, and consumers would flock to other options when the price difference isn't so much there between a wii and a ps3 or x360. also randomly though, ps3 initial price here was $1k AU, now that's insane.

    11. Re:This does not make sense by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      It's a bit inaccurate to say they're losing money by not raising prices... They're not making as much as they could, but they're certainly not losing anything.

  9. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, the *Wii* sucks because employees at your local department store buy them all up against the agreement Nintendo made with the store?

  10. Makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And as the EU imports more consoles, the euro will decrease in value, while the dollar should appreciate because Americans are buying less products oversees...

  11. Cost of localisation by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rarely do we ever get a title released here first, even titles that were developed here tend to get released in the USA first. I'd imagine that the number of customers per language is higher in North America and Japan than anywhere in Europe. Do Nintendo of Europe and the European Union even allow publishers to make an English-only release (for Irish and UK customers and intra-EU importers) followed by a multilingual release?
    1. Re:Cost of localisation by neokushan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've no idea, but there's no real reason to hold a title back from the UK just because they haven't translated it into French, Italian, German and Spanish (assuming it's not one of those titles with a language select in it, which are rare these days).
      It wouldn't be so bad, but they never bother to translate American English into British English, so really, what's the point in waiting?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    2. Re:Cost of localisation by l-ascorbic · · Score: 3, Informative

      The EU has no rules stating that companies have to release multi-lingual stuff. Individual countries (France) have rules related to language, but I think that mostly applies to advertising. There's nothing to stop them just releasing it in the UK and Ireland, so long as they don't prevent people elsewhere importing it if they want to.

    3. Re:Cost of localisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they do; you can release things in any language you want. There is absolutely no reason other than Yankee we-are-the-best posturing. Enjoy your recession!

    4. Re:Cost of localisation by miscz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, at least in here in Poland it's a regular practice. What's totally fucked up is that english ones usually cost up to twice as much as the localised ones. Add that we aren't used to this kind of translations (movies in cinema are almost exclusively subtitled and TV uses voice-over via Gavrilov translation) and it just feels wrong to hear our language used by Stroggs and other alien invaders.

    5. Re:Cost of localisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The costs to translate text is pretty low. If you do a lot of it all the time, you have people of staff. If you're doing it all the time for large volumes, there are agencies more than happy to pick up the load. Once project I was involved in, with over 100k sentences, cost around $15k to get translated into 29 languages.

      The reason consumer electronics is so dear in Europe, is the same as for cars, they can get away with it.

    6. Re:Cost of localisation by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be so bad, but they never bother to translate American English into British English, so really, what's the point in waiting? How many people live in the U.K. whose mother tongue is other than English? Would these people prefer a title that was translated into their mother tongue?

      Also, the differences between American English and British English are entirely insignificant, so why bother translating?
    7. Re:Cost of localisation by Cairnarvon · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of games that are released here (in Belgium) aren't translated. Occasionally the manual might get translated, but even that's happening less and less.
      Whatever the reason for the delayed releases and higher prices, it's not localisation. (I would guess prices are higher simply because they can get away with it, given the higher average income of their target audience in much of Europe compared to the US.)

    8. Re:Cost of localisation by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      How many people live in the U.K. whose mother tongue is other than English? Almost certainly fewer than in the US, but regardless of the answer what's the point of the question? I don't see that it has any relevance whatsoever.
    9. Re:Cost of localisation by neokushan · · Score: 1

      I dare say America probably has more foreign languages spoken by more people than the UK, I'm sure THEY'D love a version in their language as well. Frankly, I don't see why it's relevant.
      My point about the American/British English thing was that we get forced to wait for the game to get translated, yet we get the exact same text and speech as the USA, so what was the purpose of us waiting? What I was saying was it would only make sense if they actually DID translate into British English, but they don't, yet we still have to wait.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    10. Re:Cost of localisation by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      The reason consumer electronics is so dear in Europe, is the same as for cars, they can get away with it.

      The situation is somewhat the same in Canada. Because the CA$ has historically been weaker than the US$, Canadians have been conditioned to expect a difference between what we pay here and what we see advertised on the internet or on US network television.

      As the Canadian dollar has risen to (and above) parity with the US, we've seen the prices of many goods adjust accordingly (you know, free market theory and all). But not everything has become cheaper, and there isn't a lot of rhyme or reason to it when you look at what has become cheaper vs. what has not.

      By far the biggest sticking point is vehicles - a new vehicle can be anywhere from 5-30% more expensive in Canada compared to the exact same model south of the border. Some manufacturers (mostly the domestics who are getting their asses handed to them by Toyota et. al) have responded by bringing their prices down so there's only a small premium. Some manufacturers are offering special cash discounted prices (i.e. you pay close to US prices but only if you hand them cash and don't take advantage of financing). Some manufacturers have responded by changing trim and equipment levels so that it's difficult to do an apples-apples comparison. Most tellingly, virtually all manufacturers have responded by threatening their US dealer networks. US dealers have been told not to sell to Canadians, under pain of losing their dealership. As the US$ starting going down the toilet, many Canadians got wise to the fact they could drive down to Buffalo (or wherever) and "reimport" a vehicle simply by filling out a bunch of paperwork. It's almost impossible now to find a dealership anywhere close to the Canadian border who is willing to take that risk anymore.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    11. Re:Cost of localisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is a reason to delay it in the UK. The UK has totalitarian speech laws and video games must first pass censors and religious groups approval.

    12. Re:Cost of localisation by sznupi · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons for that might be lower price of PL version (in comparison with Germany/etc.) to encourage buying the damn game in a country dominated by rampant piracy. Releasing EN version for the same, low price might cannibalise a bit sales in surrounding countries.

      Of course it still sounds weird (though you have to admit that some translations feel actually better performed than originals)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    13. Re:Cost of localisation by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The reason consumer electronics is so dear in Europe, is the same as for cars, they can get away with it. And also because there's more regulations holding manufactures responsible for what they produce. If my new TV breaks within six months in the UK, the manufacturer has to prove that I broke it, if they can't it's assumed that it was defective when it was manufactured. For another few years (depending what the product is) the customer can then prove that they didn't break the item, or use it in a way it wasn't designed to be used, and get it replaced etc.
    14. Re:Cost of localisation by shermo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks for that Gavrilov link.

      It brings back memories of watching porn in Poland dubbed by one male with a thick russian accent. We couldn't understand a word they said, but it was the funniest thing we'd seen in a while.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    15. Re:Cost of localisation by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I live in a country where the main languages are german and french. I buy my games online in the UK. I do not want games translated. I want them in English and no, English is not my mother tongue.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    16. Re:Cost of localisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's two types of English!?

    17. Re:Cost of localisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, good old Polski Lektor. How I hate that guy. For non Poles it's like this: it's basically like a National Geographic documentary when they interview some indigenous woman from wherever - you know the type: she prattles on in some weird Peruvian dialect and some other woman translates simultaneously for her, with both soundtracks playing at the same time. Only in Poland all broadcasting is done like that. No matter if it's a soap, movie, documentary, porno... Only with guys doing the all the voices. Poles seem to think Cameron Diaz sounds better with an Adam's apple

    18. Re:Cost of localisation by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Publisher: Port this for Europe!

      Coder: Violence--; Sex++;

      Publisher: $++;

    19. Re:Cost of localisation by wrook · · Score: 1

      Having worked in a software company that sold to the retail market, I'm going to guess the real reason for this is distribution.

      Retail is hard. In fact it's ridiculously hard -- and expensive. I'm going to come out and say that the majority of the problem is the retail system itself. Large retail chains basically extort money. "Pay us X amount of money or you may unfortunately find your title on the bottom shelf of the last row, with the front of the box facing the wrong way."

      And then the distributors extort money. "Pay us X amount of money or you may unfortunately find that your title will be sold exclusively through Harold's House of Homoerotica & Other Software".

      And there is basically no competition (everybody having been muscled out previously, I guess). So the store makes 200% profit and the distributor makes 500% profit (or some other such ridiculous numbers). So not much money makes it back to the producer.

      Often a software house will focus on only one market simply because it is so expensive (with real up front cash involved) to sell to retail. Then, if it is successful they will release to another market. But they don't work so hard in the other markets because they are busy on the next release of software in their primary market. So they just try to lock in a modest profit and allow the distributors and retailers to rape the customer.

      I'm a programmer, though. This is just what I gleaned from talking to the sales guys at our company (which was trying to find *any* way to get out of the retail business because they were losing so much money in it).

    20. Re:Cost of localisation by neumayr · · Score: 1

      At least the German localisations suck so bad I can't imagine they spent much money or time on them.
      Anime fansubs are of higher quality...

      And no, there doesn't seem to be an EU wide regulation forbidding the sale of non-localised media. If there is, it's not getting enforced.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    21. Re:Cost of localisation by neumayr · · Score: 1

      But that's going to change as soon as you come across a game you'd want to play that wasn't made in a language you know.
      And in the interest of cultural diversity and all that, I hope that will happen at some point.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    22. Re:Cost of localisation by neumayr · · Score: 1

      ~$0.23 per sentence?
      No wonder translations often suck so bad.. :(

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    23. Re:Cost of localisation by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yep, Phoenix Wright followed that strategy IIRC. Of course some games don't get translated at all, e.g. the recent The World Ends With You.

      Of course with some publishers like, oh, most of the western ones (EA, Ubisoft, Activision, ...) you can buy a translated version (with everything translated, not just subtitles slapped on English voice acting) within a week of the US release.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    24. Re:Cost of localisation by Kaukomieli · · Score: 1

      I've no idea, but there's no real reason to hold a title back from the UK just because they haven't translated it into French, Italian, German and Spanish (assuming it's not one of those titles with a language select in it, which are rare these days).

      This is 100% speculation, but EU trade law is rather strict on companies trying to hinder the free flow of products throughout the EU, so it sounds possible at least:

      Maybe the reason is EU trade-law. If a US-version of a game gets released in the UK maybe it could get sold everywhere in the EU. So a european version with english and a couple of other languages gets "localized" and that version gets released later when all languages are ready to prevent french people playing a game in english (or whatever stupid reasons the industry came up with for region codes and the like...)

  12. Re:Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nintendo is trickling just enough Wiis (yech) into the US sales channels to keep up interest while feeding markets that are actually making money. Unfortunately, the citizenry of the US rested on its laurels and consequently our nation has been conquered from within in the name of profit, and our economy has successfully been attacked and destroyed. The effects are only now starting to become apparent, compared to what's coming. The point is, the Wii isn't a joke, the US Economy is - and it's going to take a lot of sweat to correct it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Kyle by Dragonshed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Am I the only that imagined Kyle from southpark say in response, "You... Asshole..."

  14. Thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we europeans will finally get some games before the US.

    1. Re:Thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Brain Age 2 for the DS released in Europe 2 months before the US release?

  15. With the US dollar this weak... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd have expected the headline to say "Nintento Favours Europe"

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:With the US dollar this weak... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      "The shortage demonstrates one consequence of the weak dollar. We're seeing companies ignore their largest market simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere." I laughed at this.
      If Nintendo was just in a pissing contest for units sold, then maybe they're losing out.
      But the weak dollar means the USA is no longer the largest market for what really counts: money.

      The Euro is worth 150% of the dollar and
      Nintendo only needs to make 2/3 as many sales in Europe as they would need in America.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:With the US dollar this weak... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The relative value of dollars and Euros only matters if Nintendo has some bizarre goal of minimizing the nominal amount of currency that they receive.

      That people are willing to pay more in the Euro zone is why they are sending the units there. It costs $90 and 90 Euros. Given the relative exchange rates with the yen, people are paying the equivalent of $140 for the game in Europe. If people were willing to pay $140 in the US, the weak dollar wouldn't be bothering Nintendo any.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:With the US dollar this weak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if spel checkers are an American invention that would be acceptably. Fuck you. It's spelt favors.

    4. Re:With the US dollar this weak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But the weak dollar means the USA is no longer the largest market for what really counts: money.

      That's somewhat absurd. There is more to it than just a weak dollar. The Euro is not just strong relative to the dollar but also the yen. Eurozone growth is stagnant, interest rates are high, and inflation is high. That means demand for expensive imports like the Wii is low. But that's okay for Nintendo because they can't meet demand anyways, and that is the reason they have to pick between the US and Eurozone. If I were a Nintendo shareholder I'd want to know why the fuck they are having to decide between two huge lucrative markets.

      the fact that consumers can't finda[sic] Wii or a Wii Fit is definitely a missed opportunity.
      And why is Nintendo missing that opportunity?
  16. WDYT "largest market" means? by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

    It all depends on what you want to measure. If you take:

    • x: number of customers
    • y: profit per unit sold
    • "area under the curve": total profit

    and the best profits are to be had in Europe, then it sounds like, for this product at this time at least, Europe is indeed the "largest market".

    1. Re:WDYT "largest market" means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the extremely high markup on games getting sold to Europe, Europe should always be the most profitable.

      Looking at Rock Band as an example: $180 (less in most stores) in the US, $350 in the UK (slightly less in some stores).
      Blaming that on shipping is BS, as it still arrives from a MFG in Asia.

      It's just that we're used to spending more on entertainment.

    2. Re:WDYT "largest market" means? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Europe is a larger market than the US now, no question. More people, more GDP/potential profits, more physical area.

      The EU has been bigger than the US for a while now, the thing that has held it back for stuff like release dates is the fact that there is such a variety of localisation and local market differences. Different languages, currencies, chain stores, distribution channels, laws etc.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:WDYT "largest market" means? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      You forgot z:number of units available.

      They can only produce so many at a time. The article is claiming that they are shipping them mostly to Europe because they'll get more profit per item there, while the supply is limited. Once the supply can meet the demand in Europe, they'll start shipping a LOT more to the US.

      Of course, that's only if you actually believe this is why it happened. This is a single incident that has no official word from the company... It's just something wild-ass guess that everyone is taking as fact.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:WDYT "largest market" means? by Icarium · · Score: 1

      largest market = fattest people? /ducks

    5. Re:WDYT "largest market" means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Population of Europe is around 800,000,000

      Population of North America is around 332,000,000

      Population of Japan is around 32,000,000

      Quite why Europe isn't more of a focus to these companies I don't know, it's not like the 800,000,000 in Europe are anywhere near as poor as the billions that make up China and India's populations that make those markets pointless for expensive electronic equipment.

      I think Europe is just screaming out for a European focussed electronics company, it'd certainly net them more than those who shaft Europe and concentrate on the US/Japan.

      What's more, if they were based in Europe they'd also probably be able to cut European distribution costs, easier and more rapidly translation, have extremely skilled staff available at their fingertips whilst also having Eastern Europe and the likes for cheap production.

      It'd still likely do well in the US, whilst admittedly fail miserably in Japan (just look at Microsoft with the XBox - they really don't like outsiders).

      Hell, with the fact many of the worlds cultures extend from Europe I'd argue it'd be able to make some inroads into places like South America even and certainly be able to compete in Australia and New Zealand.

      Can anyone explain why Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo haven't woken up to Europe before? It just seems like an obvious choice from the outset to me.

    6. Re:WDYT "largest market" means? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      For a more typical example, "next gen" games that would cost $60 are 70€ (almost $110), "last gen" games ($50) go for 50-60€ ($79-94), DS games ($30 I think?) are 40€ ($63) and budget games ($20) are 30€ ($47). So it's dollar value plus ten in Euro.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  17. which one is the largest market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "sending four times as many units to Europe, reaping the benefits of the strong euro.. We're seeing companies ignore their largest market"

    if nintendo sells four times as many units in europe than in the us, and for better price, wouldn't that make europe far larger market for nintendo than the us, no?

    1. Re:which one is the largest market? by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Depends in number of sales the EU region already has surpassed the USA a few months ago. If you add reemerging no EU countries like russia, I guess the market is big. But the localization splits the region apart. Since Nintendo does not use spoken language too much, my personal guess is most localizations are done during production which is normal for most products not having voice overs. (Recent hacks seem to confirm that), that does not change the problem of having different rating systems for every country and the marketing has to be done separately. But given the recent weak dollar and that in Europe prices are way higher normally anyway (If you would see what we have to pay here for a PS3 you would start to scream) it probably still is a higher profitable region than the USA currently is. The situation will reverse probably in a few years when gaming really hits china, but for now Europe or especially the EU is the biggest market!

    2. Re:which one is the largest market? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      wouldn't that make europe far larger market for nintendo than the us, no? Yes. Wait, I meant no. Wait, what was the question again?
  18. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally we'll get releases before US. Trust me, it will lead to that.

  19. Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by PKFC · · Score: 5, Informative

    Turns out Europe overtook the US gaming market for FY2007.

    I hate hearing the whining of the article repeated elsewhere: "We're seeing companies ignore their largest market simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere." That link I just posted says Japan is #1 in sales at $11.5 B USD, Europe is #2 at $11.4 B USD and US only pulled in $10.7 B USD. So companies aren't ignoring their largest market; they're giving the leftovers to the third largest market. Deal.

    1. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I hate hearing the whining of the article repeated elsewhere"

      TFA talks of the North American market. Tack on the Canadian numbers to those of the US and I'm sure you'll see the total top the Japanese numbers.

    2. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm? But from what I hear from various forums that are European based, there are Wii consoles to be found in Europe. In the USA other then the Wii I bought in January of last year, I have only seen one other store have a new Wii in it. And this is ever since the console launched.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by PKFC · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm a Canadian and don't like to be forgotten about, but that Rock Band nonsense last Christmas was ridiculous. To give numbers to your comment, US population should be about 300M. Canadian population is over 30M, but good enough to make 10% more of the US market assuming the same purchasing trends. So 110% of $10.7B USD is ~$11.8B USD. It's bad enough that the figure used is USD. Perhaps unit sales would be better to rate it since a unit in Japan, North America or Europe is the same and not a variable 1.2 or 1.5 bit chunk.

      Would be better if all numbers conformed to reporting North American sales stats, but yeah.
      Here's something on Square Enix's worldwide performance in FY2007 which I find interesting (I'm a big Dragon Quest fan). But of course, those are UNIT sales which is different. It's an exercise for the reader to get a list of all the games SE released in each region with sales figures and multiply by the cost of the game (or even better the profit margin for SE).. But too much work.

      Long story short, next year, the North American market will seem bigger again due to GTA IV (just like how SE's data showed a drop from FY06 without FFXII being released). Whether it was bigger continuously through all this time or was smaller than Europe or Japan is yet to be seen I think.

    4. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Europe is #2 at $11.4 B USD and US only pulled in $10.7 B USD. So companies aren't ignoring their largest market; they're giving the leftovers to the third largest market. Deal.

      Well, if they ignore their largest market ( don't sell much to it), then they're also going to know that largest market down in the rankings. I mean, they're selling sll to it...

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "It's bad enough that the figure used is USD."

      There's not enough significant digits for there to be a difference between the numbers in USD and CAD.

    6. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA talks of the North American market. Tack on the Canadian numbers to those of the US and I'm sure you'll see the total top the Japanese numbers.

      Keep in mind that having roughly the same total value (Especially if the 11B etc are gross totals rather than net) doesn't mean it's better or even equal.

      One thing the North American market has that Japan and Europe doesn't have is LAND. The customers are spread out over a MUCH MUCH MUCH wider territory, and it costs money to transport all that. If the sales figures were gross totals for the year, then that means they likely actually reaped far less than that at the end of the day in North America compared to Japan or Europe. If the sales figures are net totals for the year, it means the companies had to do a LOT more work and spend a lot more cash to get the same or slightly lower profit margins than other parts of the world.

      Transportation requires fuel. Fuel costs money. LOTS of money. (I've watched fuel surcharge rates soar over just the last 5 years!) So even if the bottom line is about the same, those companies will look at it and say "You know... it's a lot easier to make a buck over there..." and give preference to trying to grow those markets.

    7. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "One thing the North American market has that Japan and Europe doesn't have is LAND."

      You're forgetting sea. North America is closer to the places where this hardware is manufactured than Europe. And there aren't as many pirates (of the "arrrr!" kind) in the central Pacific (i. e. the US Navy's playground) as there are in the Arabian Sea en route to the Suez. Unless they want to go through Panama, which means even more fuel oil burned.

      Also, I'd wager that Mexican longshoremen are cheaper than their European counterparts. NAFTA means they can just truck it up from Manzanillo rather than deal with Long Beach or Vancouver.

    8. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That link I just posted says Japan is #1 in sales at $11.5 B USD, Europe is #2 at $11.4 B USD and US only pulled in $10.7 B USD"

      No. The link says Asia is #1 in sales and the $11.5 B USD was for the whole of Asia, not just Japan. Granted, Japan is the biggest market in Asia, but there are plenty of other places where gaming is big in Asia.

    9. Re:Sorry. US Market no longer leading Europe by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Americans have a hard time believing they're not the center of the economic universe in all areas at all times. You'll get past it.

      I'm Canadian, we're used to it.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  20. Repeat after me... by Maudib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no correlation between a weak dollar and the strength or status of the U.S. in the world economy. A weak dollar is not inherently bad either as it makes our exports more attractive and competitive.

    It always amazes me. When the dollar is strong everyone says the U.S. is loosing economic power because of trade imbalances (weak exports). When the dollar is weak and trade exports are much higher, then people claim the U.S. is loosing economic power because of the weak dollar. Obviously neither interpretation is accurate. A strong dollar can be good and bad, a weak dollar can be good and bad. In this case American video game exporters are probably benefiting from less competition from Nintendo.

    Such simplistic interpretations remind me of mercantilist theory, which is similairly idiotic. Carry on.

    1. Re:Repeat after me... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's true, but the US is still going down the toilet.

    2. Re:Repeat after me... by Gregb05 · · Score: 3, Funny

      b-b-but... they took er JERBS!

      --
      --
    3. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. The UK, however, is.

    4. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is no correlation between a weak dollar and the strength or status of the U.S. in the world economy. Of course there is. The less the dollar is worth to anyone else, the less economic power the US has in relation to them. This is obvious. If the dollar is extremely highly valued then those dollars could be used to buy up Japanese industries. If the Yen is highly valued then those Yen can be used to buy up US industries (if the Japanese want them). Some fluctuation is normal but it's silly to pretend that those fluctuations don't represent changing economic power.

      A weak dollar is not inherently bad either as it makes our exports more attractive and competitive. This is true. Also vomiting isn't inherently bad either as it removes unhealthy comments from your stomach. However, falling currency values, like vomiting, arise as a reaction to a problem. The US economy has real problems.
    5. Re:Repeat after me... by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. The World, however, is with it.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    6. Re:Repeat after me... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Errr what exports? Given the absolutely massive trade deficet that USA has going on right now I'd say that your weak dollar isn't going to do you much good.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    7. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we were all selling products abroad, I wouldn't argue with you. But since I don't manufacture a product that I get paid in euros for, all I have to buy Asian-made crap is my crappy dollar.

      The weak dollar benefits shareholders, not employees.

    8. Re:Repeat after me... by Znork · · Score: 1

      There is no correlation between a weak dollar and the strength or status of the U.S. in the world economy.

      That rather depends on what you measure. For the most common measure, GDP, it certainly matters; the Eurozone passed the US as the worlds largest economy sometime during the spring. To a large part due to changes in exchange rates between the dollar and the euro.

      The relative strength of a currency is, as you say, neither good or bad in itself. It does however change many things; a falling currency reduces wages and assets denominated in that currency. Good for jobs in some sectors, but did you ask for a paycut recently?

      Ultimately, allowing excessive currency fluctuations tends to damage the economy by creating large uncertainties, but sometimes, for some central banks, political concerns take precedence and it becomes preferable to socialize economic misadventures by letting the holders of assets and takers of wages pay for someone elses losses.

    9. Re:Repeat after me... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      There is no correlation between a weak dollar and the strength or status of the U.S. in the world economy.

      If people overseas avoid shopping at McDonald's or buying Coke or Levi's because of our tarnished image, it WILL weaken the dollar.

    10. Re:Repeat after me... by Znork · · Score: 1

      The weak dollar benefits shareholders, not employees.

      Not really, measured in other currencies, US stocks have been going downwards since 2001.

      The main beneficiaries of a falling currency are those who needed to borrow large amounts of the currency. So if you wanted to, for example, finance a war, it might be a good idea to look at the 'ole tax-through-inflation method. Much easier to accomplish a stealth appropriation of assets through inflation than trying to ram through significantly higher taxes.

    11. Re:Repeat after me... by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It is interesting theory. There have been a couple fascinating articles on this, the latest I have seen is this.

      Basically what it all boils down to is who has the economic growth, who has the money to support a large military, who has the money to buy off locals, and who has a compelling alternative government. A century and half ago, the powers were Spain and England. England had everything except cash and economic growth. Mosty people were kind of happy with the english way of life, and england had military power. However, due to england's lack of cash, it had to borrow money from the colonies, which meant that England was no longer a free agent. When you owe someone lots of money, you are no longer your own person.

      My main disagreement with the article is that the US has been in a real position of power for 100 years. We had some success in the early 20th century, but we never made it to international status due to the robber barons which put us in a hole that we did not crawl out of until the 50's, but not really until 70's. At this point we have had two solid generations of superpower status. We are not leaders in economic growth, and the middle class which used to defined growth is becoming non existent. The weak dollar is just making the middle class even smaller. Now, the government and the populous has to borrow,and who are we borrowing from, the chinese.

      One thing I heard about england is that it was not growing economically, and this what caused the loss of power. While the us is, we do not seem to be growing in such a way to increase spending and consumption. Those with median income and below has seen almost no growth in income over the past 40 years. Those with top 20% of income has seen their income jump 30% or more. Unless the economy is being based on yatchs and butlers, this is not a way to build a broad based economy.

      So the way to fix the economy is socialization. Spend 2 trillion a month on a war. Create new redundant departments to spend more money. Pump money into the economy be giving away cash. Don' bother with structural changes, don't worry about money that can't be paid back, just socialize, just like britain.

      Of course it is not the weak dollar that is the issue. It is the lack of discretionary income. It is the the fact that we are soon going to owe 40% of debt to foreign agents, who are now free to call us for favors, and we can no longer pressure. These facts put us back a pre-super power standing. What were the issues? Growth? We aren't on top. Debt? We owe everyone. Cash? We have none. Military? The F-22 is our cool jet, but the f-35 is yet to be built, and everything seems to be ineffective against kitchen table IEDs. The weak dollar is not the cause, but it is a symptom. We need to get serious about innovation, and serious about true fiscally conservative values.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:Repeat after me... by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      There is no correlation between a weak dollar and the strength or status of the U.S. in the world economy. A weak dollar is not inherently bad either as it makes our exports more attractive and competitive.

      The big problem right now with a weak dollar any commodity traded on the world market will be expensive to buy for anyone buying in dollars. Like say, oil for instance. Other commodities are the same way (wheat has gone through the roof). This only leads to inflation, especially with something like oil which is such a basis for the United States economy.

      High oil and wheat prices aren't completely because of a weak dollar, of course. Increased usage, decreased exploration, and speculation all drive up the price.

      --
      AccountKiller
    13. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but given the entire US economy is dependent on US consumers borrowing money (from the bank via a HELOC/credit card, loans are then packages into securities and sold to the Chinese) so they can buy Chinese made goods. It's a bad thing. If the US economy was based on say manufacturing cars and selling them to the Chinese a weak dollar would be a good thing.

      A weak dollar also sucks for anyone with savings (which isn't many people in the US given it's negative savings rate) since the value of those savings (as measured by what they can buy with them) is getting smaller and smaller.

    14. Re:Repeat after me... by HungSoLow · · Score: 1

      dey durk er durbs!

    15. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no.  If the U.S., like Japan, made such a large percentage of GDP from exports, you would be right.

      But the U.S. is a wealth creation center in a way that Japan and Europe never can be, where capitalism is job one.

      In other words, it's gotten out of hand.

    16. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the pile!

    17. Re:Repeat after me... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      This is a completely baseless agenda-pushing bs.

      The weak dollar is not the cause, but it is a symptom.

      The weak dollar is much of the cause of our ridiculously high oil prices. The high oil prices are much of the cause of our slowing economy. The slowing economy is much of the cause of our weak dollar... Aren't feedback cycles fun?

      The national debt doesn't help, two simultaneous and indefinite wars (one VERY unpopular with those guys that set the price of oil) doesn't help, and the "conservative approach" (no oversight) to banks selling mortgages hurt quite a bit as well, and was really what set off this recession.

      And a recession is exactly what it is. The "decline of empire" nonsense is utterly baseless fear-mongering. Since the '40s, they've never lasted more than 2 year, and they're typically much shorter than that.

      just socialize, just like britain.

      Great (sarcastic) suggestion there. Clearly Britain is a model we want to avoid, what with the British pound being the strongest currency in the world, more than 2X the value of US Dollars, and about 50% more valuable than the Euro. It sure would be terrible if that happened to us...

      We are not leaders in economic growth, and the middle class which used to defined growth is becoming non existent.

      That has a whole lot to do with those "true conservative values" such as vastly cutting taxes for the wealthiest, with a small superficial overture for the poorest, leaving the middle class to hold the bag and pay for damn near everything.

      The weak dollar is just making the middle class even smaller. Now, the government and the populous has to borrow,and who are we borrowing from, the chinese.

      Actually, the weak dollar should be helpful to the middle class, as they, on average, have negative savings, and inflation shrinks their debts.

      we are soon going to owe 40% of debt to foreign agents, who are now free to call us for favors, and we can no longer pressure. These facts put us back a pre-super power standing.

      The US has only been free of debt ONCE in its entire history, and it was long before we were any kind of a world power. If national debt saps national power, we couldn't have ever been a superpower... Yet here we are.

      The F-22 is our cool jet, but the f-35 is yet to be built, and everything seems to be ineffective against kitchen table IEDs.

      You think the F-35 is vulnerable to IEDs?

      There is PLENTY of US military tech that is effective against IEDs... Note Humvee heavy armor, Strykers, Tanks, and most importantly, improving technology which allows most personnel to stand well clear of danger, while killing the enemy, with minimal collateral damage. For all the talk about terrorism, the body count of US Soldiers is incredibly small, compared to any other war. 4,000? We had 10X that in the 3 years of the Korean war, which was a success. I don't like the Iraq war in the slightest, but your world view is bordering on paranoid delusions.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Repeat after me... by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is no correlation between a weak dollar and the strength or status of the U.S. in the world economy. Wrong, for two reasons.

      One, lots and lots of countries have, over the past decades, hoarded US$ as reserve currency. They see investments of billions, in some cases trillions, of dollars rapidly deflate.
      Two, the world markets have changed. Point #1 is true because for a long time you could buy anything, anywhere in the world, with US$. That's changing. Thus your devalued currency is falling not only in purchasing power, but also in reach.

      And this feeds back directly to the strength and status of the US because the US is a huge importing nation. Since there's little it exports, there's little you - as a foreign country with three times your GDP bound up in US$ - can do to get rid of your rapidly declining reserve. You can buy some high-tech, and that's essentially it. The US exports too little to spend your money, and other countries aren't really interested in taking it, because they're also trying to get rid of the crap.

      The net effect of that is that the US becomes less and less important as a trading partner, because what they offer - US$ - is becoming worthless slips of fancy paper that you're desperately trying to get rid of, instead of getting even more of them.

      That's a lot of loss of strength and status compared to a time where most of the world was trying hard to do business with you.
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    19. Re:Repeat after me... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Well the article says that as an importer, US now appears weaker. That looks quite logic. From a consumer point of view, it is more expensive to buy from aboard. Considering US a "powerful economy" is a matter of definitions I think. Just like considering Europe as a single market.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    20. Re:Repeat after me... by neumayr · · Score: 1

      OTOH, the US imports a lot more than it exports. Probably that's because, until recently, the dollar was too expensive.
      Importing more than you export isn't a good sign for the economy as such though (trace deficit is one of the characteristics of an underdeveloped country), and it's a probably a good thing the US is kind of forced to change that.
      But switching from an import to an export based economy won't be easy, and most likely will hurt a lot of people.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    21. Re:Repeat after me... by forged · · Score: 1

      Outside of the gaming context this story was posted in, it is true that a weak dollar will make stuff cost significantly less for us Europeans traveling to the US. On my last business trip to the US I was able to stockpile on clothing and electronics at a fraction of the cost of these exact same items back home.

    22. Re:Repeat after me... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      It always amazes me. When the dollar is strong everyone says the U.S. is loosing economic power because of trade imbalances (weak exports). When the dollar is weak and trade exports are much higher, then people claim the U.S. is loosing economic power because of the weak dollar.

      I am facing almost certain modding-down for saying this, but it always amazes me how widespread the inability to conjugate properly the verb "to lose" has become.

      lose
      loses
      losing
      lost

    23. Re:Repeat after me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOw does that one line comment qualify as "5. Insightful"? It says nothing new, interesting or worthwhile.

  21. Re:Heh. by RobBebop · · Score: 0

    our nation has been conquered from within in the name of profit

    Methinks you are being sensationalist. If anything, the "recession/depression" that we are going through will stimulate a tide of social-programs that will benefit the overall welfare of the country more than the sales of a few million Wiis could.

    As far as I can tell, there is only one major market that has truly fallen in shit during the last decade. Affordable real estate is an illusion in any metropolitan area for first time buyers these days. Thankfully, however, high gas prices are showing how destructive suburban sprawl is to the welfare of a nation and HOPEFULLY the next administration will concentrate on stimulating the growth of high-rise / high-quality / low-income housing within 2 miles of urban centers throughout the nation. Three years of building so that a family of 4 with $40k annual income can afford $800/month rent for a 1200 sqft apartment in a city that will free them from dependence on owning a car *will* dispel all rumors that the economy is going down the tubes.

    You doom-and-gloom predictions of "a lot of sweat to correct it" simply miss the point of what's really wrong.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  22. It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 1

    It's also a weak MARKET issue. As a recession hits, the market for toys tends to dwindle. As a larger portion of 18 to 30 year olds serve in foreign engagements, the market for toys for that age group tends to dwindle too.

    Nobody spent their economic incentive checks. That's pretty much all anybody needs to know.

    1. Re:It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by bonehead · · Score: 2, Informative

      I spent mine. It all went into the gas tank and to the power company.

    2. Re:It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      What do you think is driving the recession?

      Weak dollar == higher energy (read: oil and natural gas) prices. More $$$ spent in energy means less money for businesses and consumers alike -- this leads to less discretionary income (less for toys) and to fewer jobs (more unemployment). It's a viscious cycle which started with mortgage market collapsing, which was a result of rich people wanting to get richer by selling subprime mortgages to foreign investors -- without caring so much as to whether those people could pay those mortgages and without explaining that to the foreign investors.

      Now think about it and you'll Whom you have to thank for this mess.

    3. Re:It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 1

      What do you think is driving the recession?

      All kinds of things. We probably both know them ad nauseum, but suffice it to say a weak dollar is not in and of itself driving the recession.

      which started with mortgage market collapsing

      Nope. It started well before that. When fast food jobs started becoming listed as manufacturing jobs (back in 2002-2003?) in Michigan that was a sign, for instance. Increasingly tight immigration policies that are hurting the available workforce is another. Credit crunch is certainly another, but that's been going on for 30 years.

    4. Re:It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      As a larger portion of 18 to 30 year olds serve in foreign engagements

      You do know that a very, very small percentage of 18 to 30 year olds enlist in the armed forces, right? That's not the reason, but your first point about people not buying as much is a major factor.

    5. Re:It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 1

      Well, guesstimating 0.5% of 300mill in about 40million in that age group, that's about 4%. If you're willing to assume that a disproportionate amount of those enlisted (and targeted by Nintendo) are young men, then it shoots up to close to 10%. As the recession gets deeper and casualties hopefully get lower, the enrollment rate is likely to go up.

    6. Re:It's not just a weak dollar issue.... by razablade · · Score: 1

      Nobody spent their economic incentive checks. That's pretty much all anybody needs to know. Wal-Mart disagrees! http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200806051609DOWJONESDJONLINE000837_FORTUNE5.htm

      --
      The expression is "I could NOT care less." Think about it.
  23. What... by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    What kind of joke is this? Nintendo favoring European market? With games like 10$ more expensive, horrible translation works and one year late in most cases? We still didn't even get Smash Brothers Brawl and everyone got tired of it already. Etrian Odyssey is here when the second part is almost out in the US...and more expensive of course, just to mention a few examples.
    And, don't come back at me saying "You got X game in Europe first", because it's one every 100, and generally done as "market test" or to be able to pull out something on the "hot" season (summer, Christmas).
    They aren't favoring us at all, it's just their enterprise speak that is trying to make you think so.

    1. Re:What... by frisket · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The price they charge is a different matter. Most American companies and their Asian imitators work on the entirely false assumption that Europeans have more disposable income than Americans. I have no idea where this comes from, when it's patently untrue, but Apple have believed it for decades, which is why Macs are twice the price here that they are in the USA. Don't forget most Marketing people have the brain-power of a small gnat, and blithely believe everything their colleagues tell them (and like most professionals, myself included, spend far too much time talking to people in the same business instead of getting out for a bit). So it only takes one spark of suggestion to make the whole hive believe that Europeans will buy more of product Z than Americans will, even when the facts and the pricing make it impossible.

    2. Re:What... by morari · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Macs are twice the price of real computers here in America as is. Apple rips everyone off, not just Europeans. ;)

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  24. Their Largest Market...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're seeing companies ignore their largest market simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere."

    Presumably, shortly the US will no longer be the world's largest market. I think Europe has already overtaken in in many ways....

    And wait til China/India come on line...

    1. Re:Their Largest Market...? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Presumably, shortly the US will no longer be the world's largest market. I think Europe has already overtaken in in many ways....

      It's interesting that people are splitting "markets" into US vs Europe. Last I checked, those were still two different levels of analysis - the US being a country and Europe being a whole bunch of countries. Shouldn't it be Europe vs North America? At least, for the moment, until the EU finally realizes its dream of becoming one shiny happy country that doesn't know the difference between a constitution and a complete code of law...

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Their Largest Market...? by polar+red · · Score: 2, Insightful

      EU finally realizes its dream of becoming one shiny happy country the point of the EU is peace through economic integration; don't forget we went through 1000 years of conflict.
      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:Their Largest Market...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably because the EU is an economic union. It is acting as a single economic entity, indeed. Measuring the economic power of individual country is irrelevant in the case of a single market.

      You can eventually compare the EU to NAFTA though.

    4. Re:Their Largest Market...? by dddno · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that people are splitting "markets" into US vs Europe. Last I checked, those were still two different levels of analysis - the US being a country and Europe being a whole bunch of countries. Shouldn't it be Europe vs North America? At least, for the moment, until the EU finally realizes its dream of becoming one shiny happy country that doesn't know the difference between a constitution and a complete code of law...

      You freely substitute "EU" for "Europe". This is also an inappropriate change in "level of anaysis" and nullifies your argument: while the EU is certainly not "a country", it is definitely more than a bunch of countries, the most important difference being that the EU is a single market with capital and labour mobility*, a common trade policy and, in large parts, a single currency and fiscal policy. This market is *roughly* comparable to the US market in structure, size and performance.

      In short, for comparing US-EU in terms of economy it is irrelevant whether or not the EU has a single language, an army, a constitution or whatever else you consider an attribute of a country. Nation != Market.

      *Yes, these parameters differ significantly between US and EU, but not by orders of magnitude.

    5. Re:Their Largest Market...? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      don't forget we went through 1000 years of conflict.
      You guys were killing each other long before that.

    6. Re:Their Largest Market...? by polar+red · · Score: 1

      yeah, but you were still here back then ... unless you were in Africa killing each other, which doesn't really make a difference.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    7. Re:Their Largest Market...? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Good point. *We* were killing each other way before that.

    8. Re:Their Largest Market...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no.

      If you take how "hard" it is for example for a lawyer to move from one EU member to another, compared to a lawyer moving from one state to another, the EU is more tightly integrated.

      OTOH, there are certainly areas that are problematic.

      For matters economical, the EU is one market, and the EU commission is working hard to make it a reality. So the comparison is correctly between the US and the EU. Neither Mexico nor Canada have the level of integration that the EU has.

      In practice, because I've been living like that now for some years, as an EU "alien", one has basically all the same rights (with the sole exception that I cannot vote. Well I can vote, but not in the state that I'm living in, but in the state that I happen to have citizenship) that a citizen has, and actually less obligations (e.g. military service).

  25. Re:Heh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Methinks you are being sensationalist. If anything, the "recession/depression" that we are going through will stimulate a tide of social-programs that will benefit the overall welfare of the country more than the sales of a few million Wiis could.

    I mentioned the Wiis as signifier, not as a possible spur to economic recovery, and your attempt to distract from the actual conversation by depicting it as anything else is disingenuous at best.

    With that said, a tide of social programs is one possible outcome. It was a possible outcome during the Great Depression, too, but in actuality we never really recovered from that until we began to receive and benefit from economic concessions from Germany and Japan following WWII.

    This time it's hard to imagine where the money is going to come from. I'd like to see the public works projects, but they couldn't even bother to go save people's lives in New Orleans. I'm just not seeing it, sorry. Seriously, where does the money come from?

    You doom-and-gloom predictions of "a lot of sweat to correct it" simply miss the point of what's really wrong.

    I really meant blood, but I didn't want to seem overly melodramatic. On the other hand, blood is the cost of the way we do business today - do you have any idea of what percentage of the shit we buy from China is produced in government-owned-and-operated forced labor camps filled predominantly with people whose primary crime is that they were the nails sticking up the farthest and they needed laborers? People are literally put into labor camps for being Christians... where they make the plastic shit that we hang on our christmas trees.

    Closer to home, though, I really don't see things changing for the better without a major upset. I hope to be wrong.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you don't live in Miami, don't you? Or Chicago, or New York? Low Income high rise residential areas don't work. Projects just bring more crime, and the problem is not that we have industrial production (which absorbs high quantities of workforce), the problem is WE DON'T have that anymore! Our country is just a big Chinese market now, and if we are not buying Chinese things, we are working on our Insurance, Bank, Stock Market, Services jobs, which can move anywhere else when the owners of our country (Chinese, Indian, Brazilian and European corporations) decide they are tired of pathetic Americans dressed in red, white and blue.
    We doomed for real, this is the real deal, we fought for the Global capitalism and, in the end, it killed ourselves...

  27. Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "largest market"? Last I checked, the EU had more inhabitants than the USA.

    Just saying.

    1. Re:Market? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Maybe they mean as far as where more units are sold per capita.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Market? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Maybe, but that would be utterly illogical:

      "Hey, we really need to ramp up sales in the Vatican City for cellphones, after all, we just sold 500, and the population's only 800! Look at that per capita! Divert those sales from the US now!"

    3. Re:Market? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's your scenario that is illogical there, Spock.

      By saying that the Nintendo market is largest based on per capita sales would be much more like saying "1 in 50 households in the US owns a Wii compared to 1 in 120 in the EU". Now, these numbers can have a few interpretations:

      A. The US is hungry for the Wii and it's assorted goodies.
      B. The EU is less interested in the Wii.
      C. Either market may have a supply problem.
      D. The decline in American dollar is creating less sales even though the US is the number one consumer of Wiis.

      ect ect...

      None of which would make it easy to assume that the best potential for Nintendo's products is in either market. You're making a really really bad mistake of assuming that the problem that Nintendo is trying to avoid is over saturation of a market. Hell, to be honest you didn't really make that point either. Oh well...

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  28. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by sayfawa · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Are you saying that Barack Obama Sr (shown here with Jr) is mostly arabic? You have a very broad definition of that term.

    Amazing how any nonsense can be posted around here and get modded informative.

    --
    Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
  29. Re:Heh. by JonBuck · · Score: 1

    I guess since real estate in Boston and New York City is so affordable, those are the models we should emulate.

    Oh, wait...

    I see growing numbers of combined condo/retail developments these days. The thing is, more and more businesses are actually located in those suburbs you seem to hate so much. It's useless for me to live within two miles of an urban center is my job is actually located in another suburb.

  30. Re:ron paul by OshEcho · · Score: 0

    +1
    That's who I am voting for.

    --
    -Echo
  31. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He'll be the first Arabic-American president...not the first Black president.
    Amazing how the facts get lost in politics."

    Indeed. Since Obama's skin color has nothing to do with his ability at the White House and you mention nothing that can be related to his political abilities, then yes, you lost facts (in favor of "factoids" or unrelated facts, I must add).

  32. Re:Heh. by nuzak · · Score: 1

    HOPEFULLY the next administration will concentrate on stimulating the growth of high-rise / high-quality / low-income housing within 2 miles of urban centers throughout the nation.

    I solidly predict they will do precisely nothing. This is and very much should be a local issue. Some support from the fed gov would certainly be welcome, however, but I'm not holding my breath.

    My guess is, billions more poured into ADM's pocket for ethanol.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  33. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama may not be able to fix all of America's problems but he sure can nigger rig them.

  34. A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by flajann · · Score: 5, Interesting
    While there is some truth in what you say -- and reporters make copy by selling "bad news", however they spin it -- the real question is: how weak is too weak? If markets begin to skip selling in the US in lieu of more lucrative markets elsewhere, I really don't see this as a "good thing". The US has lost much of its manufacturing and production capacity to other countries, so there is nothing in place to make up the short fall.

    The US is a war-driven ecomony, which is unfortunate on many fronts, let alone creating weapons and systems that kill innocents en masse -- there's an associated brain drain, and the goods created in most cases have no material use that would enhance wealth -- but rather, these devices are designed to destroy wealth as well as human lives.

    China has manufacturing capability up the ying-yang (no pun intended), and as I've stated before, if they were to choose to stop propping up the USD, the US would have far more to loose than they would. Also keep in mind the Euro markets that they could -- and probably are -- transistion to if they're smart.

    No, I'm afraid this is a different situation. It might be "ok" for the dollar to have *some* weakness from time to time, but you can't tell me it would be fine if the bottom fell out on the dollar entirely.

    1. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by maxume · · Score: 1

      The problem with your point is that you are incorrect. US productivity is essentially at the highest level in history:

      http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/ipg1.gif

      That chart is for manufacturing, mining, and electric and gas utilities:

      http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      The US has lost much of its manufacturing and production capacity to other countries... China has manufacturing capability up the ying-yang (no pun intended).

      I agree with your other points, but these two "facts" seem to rarely come with actual numbers backing them up.

      So what's the truth - who's the bigger industrial nation? The US? Or China? I think it's the US, and it's probably still by a wide margin.

    3. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. Europe will help you if the bottom falls out of the Dollar entirely. We're still insanely grateful for the Marshall Plan.

    4. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by flajann · · Score: 1
      Ah, the wonders of US-produced statistics. Who was it that said, "there are liars, damned liars, and then there are statistics?"

      Yes, there is some manufacturing still being done in the US. But what those numbers don't reflect at all is what is being produced, and the level of dependency on foreign suppliers for that production.

      Also, The measures of "productivity" has always been suspect for many years because the way productivity is typically measured does a poor job of taking into account the interplay of technology of the "information age". Let's take a case in point: Microsoft. If you were tasked to measure the productivity trends of Microsoft from its inception to today, just how would you proceed in any fashion that would be meaningful? Number of software packages sold? Bottom line? Hours worked per employee vs. profits? How would you gage the "hours worked" by Steve Balmer vs. "hours worked" by some lowly software engineer at Microsoft?

      In an idea-driven economy, it is difficult to measure "productivity" realistically.

    5. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by maxume · · Score: 1

      In the face of no one ever providing contrary statistics or anything other than "Oh yeah, I don't believe those numbers!", I'm okay with using US produced statistics.

      GDP might be distorted by underestimations of inflation, but it isn't distorted by the 200% it would take for the economy to have shrunk since 1980 (that is, in inflation adjusted dollars, the lies state that the economy doubled in size in that period).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by flajann · · Score: 1
      Ah, but you are forgetting about the HUGH trade imbalance, the thing that really matters. If more *hard goods* are flowing into this country than are flowing out, what happens to us when those hard goods are either cut off or are too expensive to afford?

      You will see all those rosy stats created by the US gov go bust.

      It's very simple, really. If you are the producer of hard goods, you will always have the upper hand. China can shift to selling in the EU, providing for their own internally, selling in other markets, or all of the above.

      Since we don't produce as many hard goods, what do we do? Oh, I know! We put our blinders on and believe in the US stats! Yeah, that'll do it!

    7. Re:A Simple Lesson in Global Ecomonic Reality... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Using the lies, the trade deficit is only about 6% of U.S. GDP.

      It would hurt to have the goods cut off, but it wouldn't hurt that much (and it may well be good for people at the bottom of the economic ladder, all of the sudden there would be more demand for low skill labor inside of the U.S. Prices on junk would go up for everybody else though).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  35. we haven't been attacked, we've been sold out by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and our economy has successfully been attacked and destroyed

    First went the unions, then went the blue collar manufacturing, and now the white collar jobs are leaving due to outsourcing. And all so the top 1% can have their annual 15% increase in income while having their taxes dramatically reduced under Regan and Bush II, while the rest of us have seen our payroll taxes go up. Smashing, yea capitalism.

  36. a sure sign of the decline of the usa: by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    americans who raise their hackles when faced with the scarcity of a video game console

    the very existence of this story is a sign of the decline of american society

    "where's my blinking flashing noisy shiny drug!?"

    you can rest assured any serious society on the move isn't obsessing over video game consoles

    now go ahead, mod me a troll. prove me yet more right

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:a sure sign of the decline of the usa: by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      now go ahead, mod me a troll. prove me yet more right As of this post, someone has modded you (Score:1 Troll).
      Joy!
  37. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    43.75 percent arabic and 6.25 percent african negro Being muslim in Kenya makes one Arabic? That's a new one for me.
  38. Right... ability... by denzacar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    nothing to do with his ability at the White House Soo... Bush was also elected because of his "ability"?
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  39. Video game markets resistant to recessions? by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1
    Some people expect video game sales to remain relatively strong even through a recession.

    Movies, music, theme parks, vacations and restaurants are some of the activities consumers will likely scale back on, before they cut out their video game budget, especially in the core video game sector.

    http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3612/analyze_this_is_the_video_game_.php?print=1
  40. Really? by drsquare · · Score: 1

    If game companies favour Europe, then please tell me why games are released months late here, and at nearly twice the price. And why consoles such as the PS3 are massively crippled.

    Face it, game companies, Nintendo included, hate Europe.

  41. Re:Heh. by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    Projects just bring more crime, and the problem is not that we have industrial production (which absorbs high quantities of workforce), the problem is WE DON'T have that anymore!

    Your criticism of projects->crime is a good one. I would like to believe that projects+education->goodneighborhood, but that remains to be seen. However, I also noticed that you picked on Miami, Chicago, and New York. You left out the top ten metropolitan area that I live in. Could it be possible that *some* cities have a better formula for projects than others?

    We still have industrial production. The problem is it take 5 guys to run a plant that makes millions of widgets per days. This effectively forces the other 100-500 people who used to be needed on the assembly line to find work in the bank, stock market, insurance, and service occupations that DON'T typically produce real tangible goods.

    When our economy is so bad that we can't get the raw-materials to feed the plants producing the goods that are still made here, then we'll be in trouble. Until that point, I don't think it would hurt too bad if China/Japan/India/Korea stops sending us their consumer electronics.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  42. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make more open-source games that are fun. Adults don't need Grand Theft Auto nor do children need mario or sponegob squarepants, The Pop-culture is what is ruining gaming.

  43. Re:Heh. by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    No it is a common scheme of Nintendo to shaft certain markets in periods of time. Usually it is Europe and Australia. We often get games with a half a year til year delay. SSMB still is not released here while the localization seems to have been done in the original already and only a few bits have to be switched according to some hacking people.

    But to the worse, Nintendo uses the localization work as lame excuse for not releasing it. The real reason for this is they have clear release schedules that their titles should not collide with other AAA titles at the same time. In case of the Wii FIT the USA seems to be the screwed region, it might be that way over here in Europe pay around 140 USD for the same thing which is even a nice surplus if you count out the VAT, but it simply also could be because Nintendo regularily screws its customers in various regions for several reasons. (Have in mind we had a lot of WIIs in central and Western Europe excluding the UK while other regions had a draught, but those regions got the games which didnt - so we got a WII easily in 2007 but we waited almost a year for excite truck and other games)

    Nintendo is rather slow to react to certain situations, the Virtual console still is not fixed regarding newer LCD screens still no scalers to fix the component cable problem on those screens. The WII runs out of storage space and still no reaction to solve it. This is Nintendo, they sometimes screw up badly, then there is silence, but if there is a reaction then it is excellent, but sometimes they simply ignore the problem in the hope to have it go away over time.

  44. Quid pro quo? by frisket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is this surprising? US companies have been doing this in reverse for a few centuries: this is why so many products are available in the USA which are unheard-of in Europe. It's not just American insularity, although that may be a component: it's just what the companies fondly believe to be market forces (usually they're wrong anyway, but that's the principle).

  45. Hey, Americans! by lattyware · · Score: 1

    If you want to make a market back over there, you'll have to lower prices over here, to make it less profitable, what a shame that'd be.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
  46. Where to begin!? by MisterSquid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your post is so reactionary and simple-minded that it certainly seems to have been written by an American, short on rationality as it is. In fact, in the last day or so /. has had several posts like yours modded up because they say absurd things such as the high cost of oil is due in part to the restrictions on domestic drilling.

    If you think the US economy is in the shitter because of environmental protections you are an embarrassment to the genetic legacy your ancestors have bequeathed you.

    The US economy is in the craphole because of the massive debt that has been leveraged against insolvent debtors. This came in the form of the mortgage crisis and its effects have reverberated and multiplied through the banking system. This has led to a crisis in commercial credit which has taken away the ability of consumers to fuel the economy which further erodes the ability of the banking system to maintain solvency. The causes of the credit crisis caused by the tanking of the mortgage system has not yet finished and we are likely to see much worse before it stops.

    Regarding the offshoring of manufacturing and environmentalism, the real impact of environmental legislation in the United States is not to preserve non-human species, but to protect humans themselves. Look at the places where mining companies, steel refineries, chemical manufacturing plants, and pulp mills have operated and what you'll find are poisoned water tables and insanely elevated cancer rates. Additionally, the relative low-production of minerals from mining is due mainly to evisceration of the lands where valuable resources once existed, not due to the governmental restrictions on development.

    For you to say something like "the tree huggers over her taking so much power" is laughable. Opening all the protected lands in the US would to natural resource exploitation do virtually nothing to fix the GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS let alone the paltry problem of the US economy stumbling against the stronger European economy. The kind of neanderthal thinking that bad economic times can generate amongst people is amazing and your post is an example of such stupidity.

    Environmentalism has not caused the US economic crisis. Bad banking practice has.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Where to begin!? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      I'm not your buddy, pal

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Where to begin!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not your pal, guy.

    3. Re:Where to begin!? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I'd correct one thing..

      The WORLD economy is in the craphole because of the massive debt that has been leveraged against insolvent debtors.

      Basically the entire world invested in "AAA" bonds and the entire world lost an as yet unknown amount of money burned up on $1,000 bottles of booze and $560,000 payments on housing worth $300,000 (or less). Now the entire world is scared to invest in *anything* because they can't trust the rating services.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:Where to begin!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not your guy, buddy.

    5. Re:Where to begin!? by Chrisje · · Score: 4, Informative

      I second that motion. In Europe, the Governmental banks had to intervene in order to keep the same crisis from hitting the EU. Slowly but surely, the US mantra of "the market will fix anything" is eroding. It just goes to show that you need a fair bit of regulation in the financial sector (as in any sector) because the market will ultimately fall victim to stupid greed and short term thinking.

      The funny thing is that TFA also mentions an interesting tidbit which is preposterous:

      "We're seeing companies ignore their largest market simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere"

      Now I've worked for HP for the past twelve years. I assume everyone knows that HP is from Palo Alto originally, and a very, very solid American company. Now since 1996 already the EMEA region has been responsible for 42% or more of the total HP revenue in the world, followed by The Americas and then APJ. Since China and India are ramping up economically, it wouldn't surprise me if the US is now competing for that second spot with the APJ region.

      This notion is not just something that lives inside of large corporations like HP, but can easily be verified on Da Innerweb. If you add up the Gross National Product of member-state countries of the EU from numbers you find on CIA World Factbook, or if you simply look at wikis or reports on this, you will see that the EU has a GDP that is 15% higher than the US. Now since the US are ~300 million and the EU are ~400 million people, the GDP per capita is still a bit lower than the US', but this is also due to the fact that the newer member states such as Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia are all former Warsaw Pact members who still have a bit of growing to de economically.

      To cut a long story short, in 2006 the EU was already putting more value out there than the US. And the decreasing value of the Dollar might be good for the US' export position, but the bottom line is that the US are no longer the biggest market on the planet. It hasn't been. For years.

    6. Re:Where to begin!? by PeolesDru · · Score: 0

      You say the US economy is "in the shitter" and "in the craphole". Last time I checked, we were still doing better than just about anyone else - certainly better than the UK.

    7. Re:Where to begin!? by pcfixup4ua · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Environmentalism has not caused the US economic crisis. Bad banking practice has.

      Actually, The US Economic Crisis has many causes, our banking practice being one. Other causes Include:
      • Massive government spending on both defense and entitlements resulting in a great increase of debt as a function of GDP. (Without the necessary spending on research or infrastructure)
      • A declining educational system that has produced a deficit of scientists and engineers.
      • A short-term quick-fix mentality with our corporations, passing on long-term investments.
      • A dependence on both foreign oil and cheap labor.
    8. Re:Where to begin!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice suger-coating.

      Eu has 500 million people compared to US 300 million. And a GDP per capita that is a whopping 35% lower, not 'bit lower'.

      So a 67% larger population pool but only a 6,5% larger economy. Time to step out of that reality distortion field?

    9. Re:Where to begin!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally something to brag about huh? It makes me laugh that for many years exchange rates of the various european currencies compared to the US dollar were shit. To remedy their own economic problems various european countries banded together and the euro was born. So now the US is having economic problems, and I get to listen to a bunch of shit and anti-american statements such as "Opening all the protected lands in the US would to natural resource exploitation do virtually nothing to fix the GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS let alone the paltry problem of the US economy stumbling against the stronger European economy", what a joke. Stop comparing apples to oranges, the US is one country not a group of many. Due to this fact the value of the US dollar is much more unstable. The US economy is not stumbling against the European economy, it is stumbling against itself and the poor decision making from elected officials. The fact that only in the last year or so the euro was actually still less than the dollar still speaks volumes in itself. It only took 9/11, massive debt, a few wars, and a housing market slump to make the US to Euro exchange rates go the other way so don't go patting yourself on the back just yet.

    10. Re:Where to begin!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      So a 67% larger population pool but only a 6,5% larger economy. Time to step out of that reality distortion field?

      Typical American: low reading and comprehension skills, way too much aggression. As Chrisje wrote:

      [Europe's relatively low GDP per capita] is also due to the fact that the newer member states such as Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia are all former Warsaw Pact members who still have a bit of growing to de economically.
      We can add Hungary to the list of former Warsaw Pact countries now in the EU. These countries total almost 100 million people whose standard living is far below the EU average. That is one reason why the EU's per capita is still slightly low -- as Chrisje noted and you failed to understand.
    11. Re:Where to begin!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The WORLD economy is in the craphole because of the massive debt that has been leveraged against insolvent debtors.

      Nice try at spreading the blame. Nope, the subprime swindle was the U.S.'s fault. Only the U.S. was foolish enough to deregulate its financial markets to such an extent as to make the swindle possible. Canada, for example, never did allow any suprime loans. So own up, Americans: the mess is absolutely your fault.

  47. If so, why does Apple not sell iPhones in Europe? by bsharma · · Score: 1

    If so, why does Apple not sell iPhones in Europe first? I think iPhone is more expensive than Wii Fit. The more probable reason is they have limited quantities now and want to match their inventory with size of market to prevent disappointment and frustration.

  48. Re:Heh. by homer_s · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ah yes. More regulation to correct a problem created by regulation.

    Here is a question for you - why is that Houston,TX which lacks zoning laws restricting industrial, commercial and residential construction to specific neighborhoods, did not experience the boom/bust in real estate that other major cities did? And this in a city where population growth was among the highest in the nation?

    Just because you think something is a good idea does not mean it is. No one person can have enough information to know what the most productive use of a resource is. It takes collective wisdom in form of people exchanging resources freely with the price system transmitting the information to get the most productivity out of a resource.

  49. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama was raised in Jakarta by his white mother and various arab men (assuming she didn't remarry but continued dating while in Jakarta). He only moved back to the US when he was in his early teens or when he was around 9-10. At that point Obama as we know him was "created" so to speak.

    He's not black at all. The only thing black about him is that his genetics lead him to Kenya on his father's side. Otherwise GP is correct.

    (Of course, it's the same situation with Hillary, not like she's a fully a woman :) )

  50. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    He's a natural-born citizen over the age of 35. Does anything more really matter?

  51. Re:Heh. by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    The thing is, more and more businesses are actually located in those suburbs you seem to hate so much.

    I grew up in a suburb of NYC, and have spent the last year living within biking distance of downtown Boston. The thing isn't that I hate suburbs specifically. I am a huge supporter of the ability to choose family-friendly suburban life over city-living.

    What I think is broken is the insane housing markets in cities. On the one hand, it is a supply-and-demand problem. On the other hand, cities should be tasked to provide a safe-and-affordable place for their citizens to live.

    Meanwhile, suburbs NEED to improve public transportation options to connect the suburban grid in a way that lowers the burden for commuters.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  52. Ah, but European developers give better plots! by Gazzonyx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, but you guys also get games that I wish I could get here in the US. European game developers tend to gives games much better plot lines than the US game developers. For instance, I love the X series, and I had to scour the local games shops to find a copy of X2 and X3. Games with plots just don't sell as well here as games with explosions. Give me a well thought out plot before explosions, I say. That means I'm usually relying on German and UK based companies to deliver the goods.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Ah, but European developers give better plots! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      For instance, I love the X series, and I had to scour the local games shops to find a copy of X2 and X3. Games with plots just don't sell as well here as games with explosions.

      Hold on a sec, did you just mention the X-series of games and "Games with plots" in 2 consecutive sentences? ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  53. On the contrary ... by JoeBuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... they love Europe, because you guys are willing to pay twice as much!

  54. Re:Americans AREN'T skilled (says Toyota) by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I was BMW I'd love to settle back in Detroit; little competition from GM/Ford, tons of skilled workers...

    Queue sound of music stopping to a screech...


    "Toyota has stated it will build a new factory in Canada instead of the US because of concerns US workers are less skilled."

    "Toyota President calls American's stupid"
    http://forums.motortrend.com/70/38630/the-general-forum/toyota-president-calls-americans-stupid/index.html
  55. Re:ron paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 because you're a moron, Sir.

  56. Re:Heh. by RobBebop · · Score: 1

    Dallas is an up-and-coming technology center. This has been widely reported. There has been a TON of new technology businesses that have setup shop in Dallas in the last decade. If you want to attribute that to deregulation, that's fine.

    It takes collective wisdom in form of people exchanging resources freely with the price system transmitting the information to get the most productivity out of a resource.

    Agreed. But consolidation in the last decade has hurt the abilities of the markets to function the way they are supposed to. Oil prices are a sign of this. However, I view the high oil prices as a means to justify investment in next-generation energy. Solar and wind businesses are booming these days - and fortunately the USA has an ample supply of these resources to compete for money in these next-generation markets.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  57. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by stinerman · · Score: 1

    Yes.

    He has to have been a permanent resident of the US for 14 years.

  58. Of course share has declined... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    In the 1940s, the US was the only country whose factories were humming instead of smoldering. We were replenishing the capital stock of the entire west, that took a few decades. US marketshare for manufacturing declined DESPITE INCREASING because everyone else started manufacturing again as they rebuilt their bombed out infrastructure.

  59. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the *Wii* sucks because employees at your local department store buy them all up against the agreement Nintendo made with the store? What was the agreement that Nintendo made with the store? No sales to staff? I find that unlikely.
  60. except by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    "how it's made" largely showcases canadian companies

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:except by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! The parent is a typical jingoistic American moron.

  61. Re:Heh. by homer_s · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dallas is an up-and-coming technology center...There has been a TON of new technology businesses that have setup shop in Dallas in the last decade...

    Shouldn't that have increased prices in Dallas more than the other places like Phoenix, Florida and California? Why didn't that happen?

    But consolidation in the last decade has hurt the abilities of the markets to function the way they are supposed to.

    Can you give a few examples of consolidation and what aspect of the workings of markets that it has hurt?

  62. Re:Heh. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I find that very likely; if not that, then at least no multiple sales to staff. Nintendo as a brand loses when its customers lose _hope_ in getting a console.

  63. Game translation is nothing new by Santana · · Score: 1

    You're ignoring the fact that games are already translated to many languages when distributed in Europe.

    Heck, even in Mexico, where we usually got games in English, we're getting Nintendo titles in Mexican Spanish.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it
  64. What a coincidence by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OPEC is doing this with their oil as well.

    Nobody wants dollars any more. That their value hasn't collapsed completely is due to the fact that every foreign national banking system has a vault full of dollars. Unloading them all at once would be the biggest run on the banking system you've ever seen. So oil (and many other commodity) producers 'officially' trade their product in dollars. Unless you happen to have Euros, Yuan, or some other desirable currency. Then you get a discount.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:What a coincidence by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I don't think Iran is the only one doing it and you should be glad that a lot of countries do have an interest in the US not falling flat on it's face because if oil was sold in Euros or the Yuan only you'd be up shit creek and wouldn't be able to threaten Iran with war.

    2. Re:What a coincidence by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1
      That's just wrong.

      When someone sells oil, they get a number in an account. That number generates interest or it is exchanged immediately another currency. And you can be sure that when Sweden buys oil from Norway, there are no dollars exchanged.

      What do matters is that fewer people want to have dollars (on accounts or in bills) because its value doesn't appear to be secure, and the euro is getting more and more accepted everywhere. This process is speeding up itself as no one wants to be the last one to get rid of their dollars.

      15% of USA's economy is imported, so it's not that dependent on the value of the dollar. But a 33% drop in dollar value means that the American can buy 5% less. There are many complicated things that happen to companies, but the end story is that changing dollar value creates problems and kills companies that shouldn't have been killed.

    3. Re:What a coincidence by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      No indeed, Iran is not the only country to flirt with the idea of pricing oil in a currency other than US$. Iraq tried it once:

      In 2000, Iraq converted all its oil transactions under the Oil for Food program to euros.[2] When U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, it returned oil sales from the euro to the USD ( Petrodollar warfare)

      In retrospect, this might just have been one of Saddam Hussein's stupidest decisions ... one which Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seems intent on reproducing.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:What a coincidence by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stupid to announce it. Not so stupid to do it.

      Exporters like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela may already be accepting foreign currencies for settlements. They just aren't going to advertise it. Not until they can divest themselves of most of their dollar reserves and are willing to write off the rest.

      In fact, the secret discount rate for those who offer to pay in other than USD may already be significant. Its like my Club Card at Safeway. The non-member price is set higher than the club price (advertised). Also, I get an additional discount, based upon my spending history, zip code, and whether the lady running the register thinks I'm cute and pushes the 'extra discount' button. The Saudis might be pushing that 'cute' button whenever someone flashes a role of Euros.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:What a coincidence by msromike · · Score: 1

      Unsubstantiated anti-american bullshit, or do you have a source? I think not, that is why I phrased it the way I did.

    6. Re:What a coincidence by PPH · · Score: 1

      Un-American? No, its just pro-Saudi, China, Venezuela, or Nintendo. That's the driving principle behind capitalism. Everyone looks out for their own best interests.

      Unsubstantiated? Of course. Only someone with a martyr complex is going to get in the US's face about switching away from the dollar. Not after we destroyed Iraq for trying to do business with our competition. Who do we think we are? Microsoft?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  65. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    He's a natural-born citizen over the age of 35. Does anything more really matter? Yes, he has to have been a resident of the U.S. for fourteen years too. (Check on that too)
    Also, he hasn't been elected to the office of President twice, nor has he held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President.
  66. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Informative

    raised in Jakarta by his white mother and various arab men Thanks for clarifying ... last time I was in Jakarta I could have sworn the place was populated with Indonesians, but I now realize I was in fact surrounded by extremely clever Arabs who were impersonating people of Malay/Melanesian descent.
    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  67. What was that irony mark again? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You're ignoring the fact Irony != ignoring.

    that games are already translated to many languages when distributed in Europe. And such translation causes the delays that Daimanta was talking about. How should I have indicated my sarcasm more clearly?
  68. you mean those things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they put in planes where the companies that own and run them (civil airlines) are all going broke? And any military uses are a negative to the economy, it isn't wealth producing, it is wealth destroying, although a small percentage get money from it, overall,military and governmental spending is a net loss in general productivity. 20 years from now flying will be reserved for the ultra rich and the military bloodletting retards, the wall street and equivalent in other nations muscle boys. Cheap energy is *over*, the planet earth will be going through a major restructuring. Enjoy cheap toys and cheap travel (and cheap food) now, it is about gone for most people. Price of crude today means 6 buck a gallon gas US in the US by the end of the summer, meaning 10-12 dollars equivalent in europe, and it still hasn't stopped rising. Those speculators don't give a shit, they want to see 200 buck a barrel, they don't care, they think it won't affect them. Idiots, never even learned the early fairly tale (teaching basic economics to children) of the goose that laid the golden eggs, they want it all now, and who cares about the future.

    1. Re:you mean those things... by homer_s · · Score: 1

      they put in planes where the companies that own and run them (civil airlines) are all going broke?

      And why are they going broke? Can they consolidate and cut down costs?
      Just last month, we used GoToMeeting about 4 times for sales calls that previously we would've flown to.
      The airlines are bleeding, but they are not allowed to merge because the retards in the govt. don't understand that airlines (or any other industry for that matter) don't just compete among themselves.

      20 years from now flying will be reserved for the ultra rich and the military bloodletting retards, the wall street and equivalent in other nations

      In 1994, we (an upper middle class family in India) flew in a plane for the first time. It took my dad about a week to decide that, 'yes, we can afford the cost (vs. the train)'.

      In 2008, my cousin who is fresh out of school and in her first job, routinely takes the airplane to fly between Pune and Coimbatore - she does this twice a month and doesn't even consider taking the train.

      So, just because your govt. (I'm assuming you are from the USA) is killing your industry with regulation doesn't mean things are bad all over the world.

  69. Re:Heh. by xaxa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing is, more and more businesses are actually located in those suburbs you seem to hate so much.

    I grew up in a suburb of NYC, and have spent the last year living within biking distance of downtown Boston. The thing isn't that I hate suburbs specifically. I am a huge supporter of the ability to choose family-friendly suburban life over city-living.

    I think we need more family-friendly city-living: more ground space saved by building high should be spent on parks and playgrounds.
  70. Even Commodore did this... by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

    ..back in the day they delivered C64s to Europe first because the Brits and Germans were stupid enough to pay twice as much as the Americans were prepared to pay.

    This seems to happen across the board.

    Shame we're not clever enough to refuse to buy stuff until it's on price parity with US and/or Japan.

    1. Re:Even Commodore did this... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      In Britain, most people didn't though - they bought the Spectrum instead which was about a third of the price of a C64.

  71. Even weirder by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... is the fact that the UK too used to get most games 1 year after the USA. And don't think that any actually got internationalized to UK English and voice actors with UK accents. Mostly it was the US game, 1 year later. No idea if that's still the case, but it wouldn't surprise me too much.

    Even weirder was buying a US import version of Sega's PSO for the Dreamcast, over half a year IIRC before it got released in Europe. The weird thing is: the US version already had all the language options. I don't mean just that it also had Spanish, but it also had German and French. So someone from the USA could jolly well play the game in German or French, but the people in Germany or France weren't supposed to.

    Exactly what they needed that delay for, I don't even know. Certainly not for translations.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Even weirder by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly what they needed that delay for, I don't even know. Certainly not for translations.

      Marketing. They needed to spread out the marketing effort through time so they could do it with a fixed team.

  72. Nothing to worry about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This isn't at all a symptom of the relative weakness of the dollar to the Euro, it's actually a perfect example of the complex self-regulation mechanisms of the global market.

    More Wiis in Europe -> More gaming options for Europeans -> More gaming hours for Europeans -> Less working hours for Europeans -> Less, and lower quality, European goods -> Less demand for European goods on the US market -> Stronger dollar relative to the Euro.

    So what's the problem?

    1. Re:Nothing to worry about. by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      How did you know that owning a Wii keeps me from working? I was trying to keep it a secret....

  73. Re:If so, why does Apple not sell iPhones in Europ by sznupi · · Score: 1

    That might be more due to weakeaning of Reality Distortion Field after crossing Atlantic. Really, while number of Macs or iPods around me does inrease slightly, they're usually "just another laptop, but boy, expensive one"/same for iPod. Last iPod I've seen was at Apple conference in September, Mac - January, and I haven't ever seen iPhones here.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  74. Price of ammunition by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    The price of ammunition has shot up dramatically too due to the weak US dollar. Making it just that more difficult to fund a revolution.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  75. Re:Heh. by RobBebop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I couldn't agree more. But like I said, out-of-control real estate prices are a major urban concern. Also, another reader mentioned that cheap housing has a significant impact on local crime. High-crime areas are definitely not good for families.

    So in addition to parks, I think urban schools that are hands-down better than suburban options would be a boon for the "family-friendly" cities that you speak of.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  76. That makes a change for once by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Europe gets the shaft in gaming compared to Japan and the US. Hopefully things will balance out and we won't be treated like lepers by gaming companies.

  77. WTF? by theolein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really meant blood, but I didn't want to seem overly melodramatic. On the other hand, blood is the cost of the way we do business today - do you have any idea of what percentage of the shit we buy from China is produced in government-owned-and-operated forced labor camps filled predominantly with people whose primary crime is that they were the nails sticking up the farthest and they needed laborers? People are literally put into labor camps for being Christians... where they make the plastic shit that we hang on our christmas trees.

    What the fuck is that? Please show me where you got that information on China putting people into labour camps to produce commodity goods?

    Excuse me for saying this, but that paragraph makes you look like an ignorant dumbass. China is booming because, surprise, surprise, they embraced capitalism, and Chinese companies work very hard and pay very low wages, and their products sell well because of the resulting low prices. China is not a free country and open your mouth and criticise the government too much and you will get arrested, but they actually have a Chinese branch of the Catholic church (the Vatican and China have resolved a lot of their differences).

    The last time China put people into labour camps for being Christian was during the Cultural Revolution, about 40 years ago.

    You know, if people like you would actually read the news on occasion, and pay a little attention to what's happening beyond your borders, your economy might profit as a result of that enlightening knowledge.
    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is that? Please show me where you got that information on China putting people into labour camps to produce commodity goods?

      Google Harry Wu. Google Laogai. Educate yourself.

    2. Re:WTF? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is that? Please show me where you got that information on China putting people into labour camps to produce commodity goods?

      You're either a shill of the worst sort - paid to defend slave labor - or you're an incredible ignoramus who should keep quiet while the adults are talking.

      My most recent encounter with the idea occurred while watching a movie called What Would Jesus Buy about the eccentric Rev. Billy and his "Church of Stop Shopping". They run around the country performing demonstrations to try to make people aware of the effects of their shopping habits.

      This comment, however, is not about the film in general, but about part of one of the extras entitled "The Ten Commandments are Made in China". It opens with a man talking about an allegedly attractive display of the ten commandments - made in China. Then it shifts into the subtitled personal account of Sarah Liu Xianzhi who was sentenced to two years in Shayang labor camp for the crime of being a Christian. She was taken to a police "training center" where she was stripped naked and had an electric shock baton inserted into her mouth, causing blisters. She ended up spending six years at Shayang; while she was there she made christmas lights. She talks about the experience.

      The last time China put people into labour camps for being Christian was during the Cultural Revolution, about 40 years ago.

      Shows how much you know. Maybe you'd like to go visit the China Aid Association and argue with Sarah Liu Xianzhi about it?

      You know, if people like you would actually read the news on occasion, and pay a little attention to what's happening beyond your borders, your economy might profit as a result of that enlightening knowledge.

      You know, if people like you would pull your head out of your ass and realize that the media (not just the so-called news, but entertainment as well) in the US is over 95% owned by ten megacorporations, then you'd realize that you can't get the truth that way.

      Our economy is fucked not because we didn't pay attention to what was happening outside our borders, but because we didn't pay attention to what was happening inside.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  78. O RLY? by nicolaiplum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been trying to buy one of those Wii Fits that are supposedly all over Europe and I can't find any for sale in the UK.
    Amazon.de has some, that's all I can find. No English versions anywhere.
    I'm sure some 'leet slashdotter knows where there's a secret stash in the UK, and they may even tell me, but that doesn't change the fact that they're effectively unobtainable in the UK too.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
    1. Re:O RLY? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I saw some at Game today.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  79. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by theolein · · Score: 1

    With wisdom and courage like yours, it's a wonder that the USA hasn't yet imploded due to the low density of intellectual acumen.

  80. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Drive42 · · Score: 0

    Genetics have a lot to do with race, but race is a cultural construct, and one's genetics do not necessarily determine one's racial category.

    Look to the "one drop" rule for race inclusion, a rule that has been used in the United States extensively, and there would be no doubt that Obama would have been categorized as "colored" in a historical US. Since we are concerned with traditional race constructs in the US, it is safe to say that Obama is the democratic nominee for president, and he is black.

  81. doesn't this help us? by v1 · · Score: 1

    I thought the way to improve a country's economy was to encourage other countries to buy products made here? And to discourage our own countrymen from buying abroad? (all that "buy Made In The USA" noise we hear)

    What part of this (what Nintendo is doing) is bad?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  82. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, do you think the fact that it's the center of the OIL INDUSTRY had anything to do with that?

  83. Re:If so, why does Apple not sell iPhones in Europ by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    They don't? I must have been dreaming when my father in law showed off his iPhone today.... (I live in the EU, just in case you wonder...)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  84. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle has been doing fine and it has tons of zoning regulations, so I guess that means the cure to not having a boom and bust cycle is both to have few zoning regulations and having a lot of zoning regulations. Great use of logic there, homer.

  85. Re:ron paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ron Paul '08!!!

  86. which state? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interested:
    Which State is this?

    Why do people confuse "England" and "United Kingdom" so much and use the terms interchangeably? (for your own health and safety, please don't make this mistake when visiting Scotland/Wales/Northern Ireland)

    Curious... thanks in advance...

    1. Re:which state? by zsau · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same reason people confuse Holland and the Netherlands. England's the bigger part with the stronger economy and has been for long and consistently enough that that's all that counts. Also, "England" (and "Holland") has the advantage of being much less of a mouthful and much more of a normal country name than "the United Kingdom". See also the US being called "America".

      Also, for the same reason people called roads "roads" and turnips "turnips": Because that's what people in our society do. It's not intended as a slight against the Scots, the Irish or the Welsh, but it's merely the convention.

      --
      Look out!
    2. Re:which state? by FST777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because the Brits do the same with "Holland" and "the Netherlands"...

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    3. Re:which state? by lightversusdark · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts.
      The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 declared that all men were born free and equal, but it took a test case to bring about emancipation, which took three years.
      Hardly anyone has ever heard of Kwaku Walker.

      --
      "There is nothing nice about Steve Jobs and nothing evil about Bill Gates." - Chuck Peddle
    4. Re:which state? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Because we don't know how it is?

      England - England
      Great Britian - England + Scotland + more
      United Kingdom - All of above + australia + colonies in africa + ?

      Or what are the differences? I just use them as various words for the same thing so feel free to explain it for me. (I guess wikipedia might had solved it aswell.)

    5. Re:which state? by aliquis · · Score: 0

      So what are the difference there then? Netherlands contain Holland and what more? Hollands colonizations?

    6. Re:which state? by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just use them as various words for the same thing This won't make you popular with someone not from England, though English people generally won't care.

      UK = England + Wales + Scotland + Northern Ireland
      GB = Old fashioned term for England + Wales + Scotland
      England = England
      Commonwealth = lots of former colonies + UK

      So you'd generally be safe using the UK where you would normally say 'England'.
    7. Re:which state? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Informative

      England = England
      great Britain = physically connected countries = England + Wales + Scotland
      United Kingdom = England + Scotland + Wales + Northen Ireland
      commonwealth = all the places we conquered (Australia, etc)

      generally though nobody really notices the distinction between the 1st three even though the difference between GB/UK and England is becoming significant as Scotland gains more independence

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    8. Re:which state? by ozamosi · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the Netherlands. To the left, note "Noord-Holland" and "Zuid-Holland".

    9. Re:which state? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Holland is a part of the Netherlands, but we dutchies also interchange it a lot.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    10. Re:which state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intresting, I'd have to look into it more. I guess the countrys name are the netherlands? Here in Sweden everyone say Holland and I just thought the Netherlands was the english name for it or something. Thanks.

      / The guy above.

    11. Re:which state? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But Scotland and so on are countries of their own? They have their own government and such? Or are all "ran" under the UK?

    12. Re:which state? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Also worth pointing out if you want to avoid causing offence:

      Great Britain is the island shared by Scotland, England and Wales. The British Isles is the term used in the UK to refer to the UK, Ireland and the Isle of Man, and has stuck for lack of a better term.

      It's advisable to avoid the term in the Republic of Ireland, as they are neither part of Britain geographically, and are no longer part of the UK politically. And they rather like it that way.

    13. Re:which state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's not intended as a slight against the Scots, the Irish or the Welsh, but it's merely the convention. Northern Irish thank you, the majority of the Irish are not in the UK
    14. Re:which state? by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      Scotland, Wales, and England are each considered both countries and nations (and so is the UK, confusingly). Scotland and Wales have partial control of their own affairs, Scotland more so than Wales, but mostly they are run from London. Northern Ireland is... different.

      The difference is mainly cultural rather than political, but the Scots and Welsh at least take it seriously.

    15. Re:which state? by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Great Britian = England + Scotland + Wales.

      It's that big island on the east side of Ireland.

    16. Re:which state? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's Massachusetts; see sibling posting. And I used England in this case quite deliberately, as my source only gave a date for abolition in England, and I couldn't be sure that the abolition applied to all of the UK at that date. Believe me, I know very well the difference between the UK and England (and that the differences have changed over the centuries, too).

    17. Re:which state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Britain is not an 'old fashioned' term. It's just a geographic term: the largest island of the British Isles (wikipedia)

    18. Re:which state? by nickos · · Score: 1

      See also: Danish != Dutch != Deutsch

    19. Re:which state? by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Unless you are talking about the Pennsylvania Dutch, who are basically German.

    20. Re:which state? by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Scotland has a parliament and an entity which refers to itself as a government (previously executive) and a First Minister. Wales and N.I. have assemblies and First Ministers, but I'm not sure what the ruling organisations are refered to as. England has no separate organisations outside of the UK parliament, which causes interesting imbalances and tensions. The easiest - but not anywhere NEAR as complicated and confusing - parallel is to think of England, Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland as the equivalent of states. There are further subtleties though - Scotland for example has completely independent legal and educational system.

    21. Re:which state? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Great Britain is actually the name of the largest of the British Isles. The Isle of Skye is in Scotland, but it's not part of Great Britain. The Isle of Wight is part of England, but not part of Great Britain either.

    22. Re:which state? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Someone else in this thread already disagrees with you:

      http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=577527&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=23703301#23706509

      Now you see the problem.

    23. Re:which state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't England rule all the lands at one point before they were given back to the Irish, Scottish and Welsh?

      BTW, Wales is a very beautiful country. Never been to Scotland and (either) Ireland yet, though.

    24. Re:which state? by nickos · · Score: 1

      You're proving my point. The "Pennsylvania Dutch" were indeed German, and their name is a corruption of "Pennsylvania Deutsch".

    25. Re:which state? by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      Or are all "ran"[sic] under the UK? That should be run.

      Scotland and Wales were until a few hundred years ago separate countries, and each have their own assemblies nowadays with limited powers. Racially the islands are very mixed, people travel freely, laws are mostly the same (save some areas of Scottish law), and English is spoken almost exclusively, so the UK can be considered one country for most purposes - the name of that country is not England though.
    26. Re:which state? by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      Someone else in this thread already disagrees with you:
      Now you see the problem. If the UK referred to itself officially as 'England', if this was common usage across the UK, or if other countries recognised the agglomeration as 'England', you might have a point. As it is someone using the word 'England' for the UK (or UK+Ireland as that poster does) marks themselves as ignorant, lazy or both.
    27. Re:which state? by zsau · · Score: 1

      People from Northern Ireland are Irish and British so what I said was correct. Obviously I wasn't talking about the Irish who aren't British because they weren't relevant to the conversation.

      --
      Look out!
    28. Re:which state? by zsau · · Score: 1

      Your question is confused. Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales are still a part of the United Kingdom along with England. The Parliament at Westminster is soverign and can make any law it chooses with application extended only to England or the whole Kingdom or any other part thereof. England itself has no Parliament nor Government and has not since the unification of Great Britain in the early 1700s. Before the union, England and Scotland had the same government — the Monarch in both was the same person and combined the two roles[*] and lived in and was more concerned with England — but separate Parliaments. Scotland nowadays has a Parliament and its own Government again, which can pass many laws, but is not fully independent nor indeed sovereign in the sense that an American or Australian state is; the Scottish government has no existence apart from what Westminster gives it. Wales does not have a proper Parliament or Government but does have some degree of self-rule. The situation in Northern Ireland is too likely to change for me to know where it is.

      Now while England was a republic, the Commonwealth of England was able to control Scotland and Ireland. But aside from this, while government might have been — and still is — from England, it was never in Scotland by England.

      As for Ireland and Wales, yes, after they had been taken by force by England, they were ruled by England. But the reason one might not say today that (Northern) Ireland and Wales are governed by England is because the UK and as integral parts, people in Northern Ireland and Wales get to vote.

      [*]: Note that presently the Monarch of the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia is the same person but does not combine the roles. This is because the Monarch has no political influence and acts solely on the advise of the relevant ministers.

      --
      Look out!
    29. Re:which state? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Great Britain isn't old fashioned, it's the name of the actual island (the other islands being Ireland, the Isle of Man etc).

    30. Re:which state? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      commonwealth = all the places we conquered (Australia, etc)
      That's funny. Probably should have picked a better example ... something actually fought over. Not just rocked on by, looked at the map and said "funny, that's not marked here".

      Although, Australian aborigines may have something to say about that. While watching the kangaroo roast over the coals, leaning on spears and generally shooting the breeze, strange pinkos arrived and had sticks that made big noise, bigger than kookaburra, and made hurtfulness. Strange tribe, not seen before, declared 'ownership'* of land.

      Can't believe you were modded insightful.

      * Ownership being difficult for the then aborigines to understand since land will still be there when they die.
      --
      .
    31. Re:which state? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Holland was the most powerful province of the United Provinces of the Netherlands, and the province that did most of our trading and colonisation in the 16th and 17th century. So most Dutchmen that foreigners would meet, tended to be from Holland. In the 19th century, Holland was split into two provinces, so it would stop overshadowing the other provinces so much.

      And then there's the word "Dutch". No idea why English speakers use it, but I suspect it comes from the very archaeic "Diets", which I think simply means "people", and is related to "Deutsch" (or "Duits" in Dutch), which refers to Germany. And "German" comes from "Germaan/Germaans" which refers to Germanic peoples, including the Angles, Jutes and Saxons that colonised England in the very early middle ages.

      Personally I'd prefer if you called us Netherlanders and Netherlandic.

    32. Re:which state? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Intresting, I'd have to look into it more. I guess the countrys name are the netherlands? Here in Sweden everyone say Holland and I just thought the Netherlands was the english name for it or something. We call our country "Nederland".

      "Koninkrijk der Nederlanden" or even "Verenigd Koninkrijk der Nederlanden" (United Kingdom of the Netherlands), is only for when you want to get extremely formal and official (although the "United" might have been abolished when Belgium seceded, I'm not sure about that).
  87. That's good by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    We import too much stuff anyways.

  88. Mexico by Roadmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, well, here in Mexico we enjoy a nearly 100% markup over US prices (the Wii is US $470 and Wii Fit will run you US $150). And indeed you can see mountains of boxes in stores, even walmart stocks tons of wiifits and wiis. So while a lot of them will languish for a while on the shelf, Nintendo knows that those who sell will give them a really huge profit. By ignoring the economic reality of the country, where a cheaper console would indeed move a larger number of unis, they maximize their profit by catering to those who would indeed pay those sums for the console. Sadly that excludes about 98% of the population.

  89. Re:Heh. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    One basic fact to consider is that people's income is very relative.

    Right now, a lot of people make $100k. So getting a year of their work costs $100k.

    If we had a big collapse and $20k would get you a house, food, etc. then a lot of projects suddenly become feasible because labor costs drop.

    The problem is holding debt from before the income crash.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  90. dick smoking euro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that really the best you could come up with? Dick smoking Euro?
    Surely a man of your vast intellect could come up with a better slur for European than simply "Euro"? It's the name of the currency used in most of Europe, it's hardly offensive.
    It'd be like me calling you a dollah or something.

    I can only give you 4/10 for that attempted flame, please try harder.

  91. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laws, no matter how they are written, are still just ideas. When it comes to knowledge and power, people will not let anothers idea stand in the way of their own. This concept can lead to innovation, revolution and even war.

  92. Americans are buying fewer consoles BECAUSE by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

    ...they're spending more time on SOCIAL NETWORKS.

    YouTube, MySpace, FaceBook, SecondLife, blogging, chat rooms, etc.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
    1. Re:Americans are buying fewer consoles BECAUSE by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Please. It makes more economic sense in the current environment to collect payment in Euros, hands-down.

    2. Re:Americans are buying fewer consoles BECAUSE by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't have any teenagers in your house.

      Btw, all they'd have to do is raise the price to compensate for lower USD.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    3. Re:Americans are buying fewer consoles BECAUSE by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I'm 20. I know exactly what the current generation is doing. "Social networking" is still not as much of a time-consumer as games (or in some people's cases, television).

      Also, yes, all they would have to do is raise the price to compensate. Have you considered that raising the price would lower the demand in the U.S.? As the dollar continues to depreciate, we'll see spending on luxury goods dry up as real incomes fall.

      Also, even if you just raise the price, you're still collecting and holding U.S. dollars for at least as long as it would take you to convert them into a different currency -- they will depreciate more in that time period.

      The CFO of Porsche recently made the company a boatload of money through currency exchanges -- one of the things he did was to centralize the corporation's accounting, so that the company's reserves could be held in Euros instead of the various currencies of their local branches.

    4. Re:Americans are buying fewer consoles BECAUSE by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      . Have you considered that raising the price would lower the demand in the U.S.?
      Wii = $250
      360 = $300
      PS3 = $400

      Plenty of room for price compensation, particularly considering the Wii is in highest demand of all 3 major consoles.

      Also, even if you just raise the price, you're still collecting and holding U.S. dollars for at least as long as it would take you to convert them into a different currency -- they will depreciate more in that time period.
      Negligible. Currency exchange transfers would occur in days.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  93. seven of top ten reasons: by mevets · · Score: 1

    10. They can't make them hold that much weight.
    9. They can just sell empty boxes and nobody will notice.
    8. They think its pointless.
    7. They will get sued for all the heart attacks.
    6. They are trying to add a hamburger eating exercise.
    5. They want to print a McRap coupon for every 10seconds of use.
    4. They won't be able to sell Super Mario if there are no fat americans. ....

  94. Largest? by Zebra_X · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "We're seeing companies ignore their largest market simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere"

    Wiki indicates that there are approximately 495 million people[1] within the borders of the EU member states.

    So America is not really "their largest market". The conversion rate is much more in favor of the EU residents.

    We'll get our Wii Fits eventually, but only after people whos dollars are worth more than ours.

    [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union

    1. Re:Largest? by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Also according to Wiki and the Human Development Index (HDI), only five of the twenty-seven member states of the EU have a higher standard of living than the U.S. (currently twelfth, down four from the previous Index).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index

      Purchasing power is part of the equation of the HDI, and until this year, the purchasing power of most EU nations was significantly lower (meaning the same goods cost more) than North American countries and a handful of countries around the world. If this shift in marketing focus for the Wii is accurate, we should see a significant drop in U.S. purchasing power and hence, its HDI ranking.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  95. We export iron ore to China. by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 1

    From the Iron Range in northern Minnesota. And in the form of scrap metal sent over in containers that brought shoes on their trip east.

  96. Not really. by Growlor · · Score: 1

    The housing crisis was largely a result of a problem we had long before then: Our traditional industries were dying/leaving and the only thing holding our economy together was people's ability to borrow against their houses and continue to spend like drunken sailors. I have no idea how we are going to pull out of this. When I go to a store it is REALLY hard to find something that says "Made in USA" on it (and I look almost every time I am planning on buying something.) In fact, I don't know of any industry where we are a true leader anymore except tobacco and weapons. These are not the kinds of products I would like to see us associated with. The loss of all those manufacturing jobs means that there is a river of money flowing out of the US instead of into it. We have borrowed tons of money to buy our cheap, made in Asia toys and OPEC oil. Now they have so much of our currency that they must be wallpapering their walls with it. This has naturally led to a decrease in the value of that green wallpaper.

  97. Re:Heh. by isaac · · Score: 1

    I think we need more family-friendly city-living: more ground space saved by building high should be spent on parks and playgrounds.


    Please let this be sarcasm. Le Corbusier is dead and they've been tearing down Cabrini Green for the last 5 years.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  98. Re:Heh. by evilviper · · Score: 1

    More regulation to correct a problem created by regulation.

    You're more than welcome to prove that "regulation" caused our current problems. All evidence points to the contrary.

    why is that Houston,TX which lacks zoning laws restricting industrial, commercial and residential construction to specific neighborhoods, did not experience the boom/bust in real estate that other major cities did?

    It was because of my "economy rock". I keep it in a post office box in Houston...

    My baseless correlation is just as strong as yours...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  99. 8 Trillion in debt, it's a no brainer by kolbe · · Score: 1

    I never thought I'd see the effects of the US/OPEC deal made by Henry Kissinger effecting my video game availability, but here it is. The US is so screwed, yesterday we were happy paying for the National Debt through the gas pump, today we're sad we can't get our damned Wii Fit. What's next? Microsoft goes bankrupt? Sheesh

    Ron Paul - US Economic Fate:

    http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=1727

    How the US is run by American Corporations, not politicians:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8668319287834598272&q=&hl=en

    John Perkins - Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=589608024067160205&q=&hl=en

    1. Re:8 Trillion in debt, it's a no brainer by Chrisje · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Paying for the national Debt through the Gas Pump? When I was in California recently, I payed some four dollars for a gallon of gas. And I laughed my ass off because it's NOTHING! You people are funny with your "Gas prices are affecting daily life" billboards.

      I can't even f#$%ng remember when I last saw gas that cheap in Europe and / or Israel. Think about it. That's roughly a dollar .five per liter. One dollar five per liter means roughly 70 Euro cents per liter. Damn. In most parts of Europe you pay 1.50/1.60 Euros per liter of gas. This includes Israel, at around 8 shekel. Granted, US fuel is of lower quality (87 octane rather than our 95 and 98), but still...

      And if you still think gas prices are too high, I got one word for you: Compact. The rental agency had a "mid-size" for me. A chevvy impala which could house a small indian tribe. Compact in the US is a mid-size family car everywhere else.

      Not happy with the gas price? Don't buy a four ton truck that guzzles five gallons to the mile then. If all of y'all would invest less in pick up trucks with "In God we Trust" stickers on the back, you might find your gas prices quite agreeable.

      Damn fools.

    2. Re:8 Trillion in debt, it's a no brainer by weave · · Score: 1

      Just a nitpick but U.S. measures octane differently than Europe. Still looks like it's lower in U.S. but not as much as it seems. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

    3. Re:8 Trillion in debt, it's a no brainer by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      If all of y'all would invest less in pick up trucks with "In God we Trust" stickers on the back, you might find your gas prices quite agreeable.
      Some of us have been driving compacts all along, and still expect a fill-up from 1/4 tank to be around $17. Granted, I know it's going to be nearly $50 to fill up my little Sunfire, but I still get a "that can't be right" moment.

    4. Re:8 Trillion in debt, it's a no brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, you hate Americans, we get it. But at least don't come off like a total moron. Gas is cheaper here, largely because we don't tax the heck out of it like you guys do. For us, gas prices have more than doubled over the past few years. The % change for you guys is much less since you had such high taxes.

      Because we have had such cheap gas, we were able to buy large, gas consuming vehicles (not me personally, but a lot of Americans did). Seeing gas prices rise so sharply and owning cars that get poor gas mileage means that a lot of people have a lot less expendable income. Expensive gas also means that the prices of everything else rise.

      Your solution of getting a smaller car shows how little you know about finances. The cost of trading in your SUV for a compact would take years to make up. Only if you are in the market for a new car does it make financial sense. And guess what, a lot of people are doing that right now.

      I guess I understand to a certain extent the anger directed towards us. Our government has done a poor job for us and the world. Americans are people just like you. You have traveled, you should have more of an open mind. Instead, you come off as close minded and a jerk. People are suffering...and in your mind, you think they deserve it. That's pretty sad. Despite all the anti-US sentiment in this posting from Europeans, I don't wish any ill towards your country or your people. You (not your country, but you) come off like you have some sort of inferiority complex.

  100. Re:Heh. by Tom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we never really recovered from that until we began to receive and benefit from economic concessions from Germany and Japan following WWII.

    This time it's hard to imagine where the money is going to come from. You've already said it: WW3. You justs elected the guy with the family experience a few years too early, and he was a dumbass who probably ruined his brother's chances.

    I seriously do expect that the US will start a major war to beef up its economy. It definitely can't afford to go without a war at this time, I'm pretty certain it can't support a peace-economy anymore.
    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  101. long list of changes by Tom · · Score: 1

    That's only one part of a long list of US/EU changes we've been seeing recently.

    Here's another one: For many years, the price of Apple products was the same in US$ and Euro. It stayed the same even when the Euro was already 1.2:1 over the US$. That changed last year.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  102. Re:If so, why does Apple not sell iPhones in Europ by msromike · · Score: 1

    Where the hell is the EU? and what language do they speak there? Oh, that's right "the EU" is an attempt to temporarily bloster the failing economies of Western Europe by creating a unified currency and giving up autonomy. Maybe that's why all the people that live "in the EU" sound like socialists. You better be proud of the EU because that is all you have left. Talk about sell-outs. But then again giving up your country whenever the going gets tough is not a new concept in "the EU."

    I have a feeling this might get modded down. But I figure the only way anyone sees anything written pro-america around here is with threshold -1 anyway.

  103. What is this story about? by SupremoMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It seems like just a lightening rod for trolls and self-righteous tard trolls. Whya re these comments marked interestign and insightful?

  104. Re:Americans AREN'T skilled (says Toyota) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alabamanians tend to be thought of as stupid by most Americans too. It wouldn't surprise me if the IQ/per capita there is a bit lower. Why build a manufacturing plant there? Having said that, no matter where you go most people are very, very stupid. No exceptions. Although if there were to be an exception it might be Japan. Anyway, he didn't actually call Americans stupid.

  105. Re:Heh. by iwein · · Score: 1

    Somebody please enlighten me: Why not just up the price because dollars are worth less? I'm always amazed to see products sell in the us for the same amount in dollars as they sell for in euros in Europe. How does that make sense?

    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  106. There is not EU- tax on video games at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo is offering identical appliances whereas Sony is milking the consumer in Europe.

  107. Anyone care to look at populations? by Capitalist+Piggy · · Score: 1

    The US has about 300 million people versus Europe with over 720 million. This could have some impact on these sales figures, the European Union (since everyone wants to compare how a large batch of countries are doing compared to one country).

    Also note the Xbox 360 sold 10 million units in the US with less than 2 million sold in Europe. Perhaps we could turn this around and say European markets must be failing because a singular product isn't doing as well in their market? It wouldn't be sane. Nor is the majority of this thread.

    I know everyone wants to bash the US and pretend like everyone is a little George Bush, but keep in mind, the pendulum swings back and forth. If folks who want to bash on the US look back a few years, Americans weren't bashing on your nations while economic times were tough, while some of you were sitting under rather shitty governments, etc. From what I saw, people here were out in the streets protesting and wanting more fairness in the world markets, regardless what the tiny sector of people we call our leadership wanted.

    What concerns me is that the average Joe six-pack will eventually get tired of hearing anti-American sentiment and continue voting for loose cannon leadership and it'll be a day we all live to regret. This is why the average person in the US has been taught to not hate the people, only the governments, of places we have disagreements with for several generations now.

    Then again, I am sometimes tempted to go NeoCon after playing video games online while the sun is up in Europe. Nothing like being nice, contributing to a game and getting nothing but "STUPAD AMERIKKKAN U SUCK ASS U FUKKER", "I HOPE TERRORISTS BLOW YOUR SORRY COUNTRY UP" or any number of mindless, violent words from even team mates about where I live from an endless stream of, for the most part, adult European gamers because they picked up on my accent. It's also notable that US gamers rarely pick on Europeans, as most of us consider them cousins, or whatever, since most of our ancestry comes from there. Just like in this thread. :)

  108. Re:Heh. by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Houston is an oil town (I used to live there) and is booming off high oil prices, that's why.

  109. simply because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    simply because they can make a greater profit elsewhere

    That's not "simply", that's real life. Just as like so large speculations have begun in the raw materials and oil businnesses when the USD began to weaken - and it still goes on - this is also another proof that shows that one by one, everyone is beginning to transition to the euro from the usd, which is really not such a bad thing, if you think in global terms and not just in what is the best for the US terms. It's high time the US started paying normal prices for the humongous amounts of gas they eat up (trucks and DoD/Pentagon included) and see what happens when not everything goes how they would like it to go.

  110. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well hey, look on the bright side: if the US dollar value keeps plummeting, corporations will start outsourcing their computer work there.

  111. Nintendo by PeolesDru · · Score: 1, Informative

    I thought for shits and grins I'd talk about, you know, Nintendo - since the article is about Nintendo. I think it's just stupid. I saw an advertisement for the Fit the other day on television. Why waste money advertising? They're effectively not being sold in the US. If anything, the advertisement was a boon to all of the scalpers who are selling them for $170 on eBay, Amazon, etc. Nintendo could be selling them for $150 apeice easily. I find it hard to buy the argument that Nintendo is savvily going where the profit is, when they waste money advertising their unobtainable product, and no doubt piss off vendors like Walmart and Target (and others) who have dedicated shelf space to this non-existent item.

  112. Re:Heh. by polar+red · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether you need to have a war, but look at how well Germany did after WW2, and how much army they had.

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  113. Europe has best growth potential too. by Xest · · Score: 1

    It's probably worth noting also that with 800,000,000 people in Europe, 332,000,000 in North America and only 120,000,000 in Japan and without the issue of poverty in Europe that plagues even larger markets like China and India, Europe is probably the best place to focus on. It really does have brightest future in terms of sales potential in the near-term. China/India will be good choices eventually, but not for another couple of decades.

  114. Around 500,000,000 more to be precise. by Xest · · Score: 1

    ...and it's not like they're all suffering from poverty as many of the high-population asian markets are.

    You're right, Europe is a sensible market to focus on. Over 2, almost 3 times the population of relatively wealthy (in whole world terms) people is quite a difference!

  115. fit not hot by GIS.thrills · · Score: 1

    lets not blame the weak US dollar before we blame the weak Nintendo idea. come on Nintendo, the wii isn't a hit now take your medicine.

  116. Ha! by vecctor · · Score: 1

    and it just feels wrong to hear our language used by Stroggs and other alien invaders Haha! So now I have to ask, how do they say "Oh my Strogg! They've taken the data brain!" in your localized version? ;-)
    --
    Why, yes I have been touched by His noodly appendage. And I plan to sue.
  117. Re:Americans AREN'T skilled (says Toyota) by merchant_x · · Score: 1

    This doesn't jive with what I've seen with my own eyes. In the last decade Toyota has built plants in Indiana, Tennessee, and Kentucky. Subaru is advertising it's new green plant recently built in Indiana as well. That news article sounds like BS to me.

  118. Simple fix by slapout · · Score: 1

    Charge more.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  119. Re:Americans AREN'T skilled (says Toyota) by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

    That news article sounds like BS to me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_RAV4

    "Toyota's Woodstock, Ontario, Canada assembly plant comes online in 2008, models sold in North America will be assembled exclusively there (effective May 2009)."
  120. quote of the day in TFA :-) by slashbart · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> "They know that Americans will be just as fat a few months from now" when Nintendo will have more units available, he said.

    OK, let the flames begin!

  121. Re:It will all end on Jan 20, 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They country is predominantly Islam, so they must be Arabs, right? Barack Hussein Obama is an Arab. Kid Rock and Eminem are black. Kobe Bryant is Italian. Tarzan is an ape. I'm a drunken redneck.