Slashdot Mirror


eBay To Disallow Checks and Money Orders In US

Sir_Kurt writes "In eBay's latest FAQ, they explain that sellers (for the good of the buyers) will no longer be allowed to accept checks or money orders as payment. They can take electronic payments only. So, will Google Checkout, Checkout by Amazon or Amazon Flexible Payment be allowed? No, says eBay: 'Google's and Amazon's products and services compete with eBay on a number of levels, so we are not going to allow them on eBay.' Options are limited to PayPal, ProPay, direct credit payments to the seller, and 'payment upon pickup.' But remember, this is for our own good!" eBay ran into trouble earlier this year for trying to restrict payment options.

412 comments

  1. Actually they are right by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Too many people fall for the "I will send you X+Y and you send me back Y with the item".

    Besides if your dealing on the net the protection of a CC is a must

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Actually they are right by Macthorpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That doesn't excuse banning competing payment systems, however, especially ones that meet the same standard as Paypal.

      This is a sideways move towards allowing only Paypal transactions to be made in the US - they're testing the water and seeing how far they can push it.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    2. Re:Actually they are right by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

      countered by: "I X by paypal, and pray I receive Y - as many times I have not." It's not worth it to deal with Paypal Protection, as a better use of my time is getting the item I may need.

    3. Re:Actually they are right by nbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      especially ones that meet the same standard as Paypal.

      Quotes like this make it sound as if Paypal had a standard. Instant transfers and protection from fraud on ebay sound great, but there are also many cases in which money gets retransferred for no apparent reason or accounts are blocked because something was not conforming to their "policy". To me they are just pretending to be a real bank. As long as it works as advertised it is great but when there is trouble you'll face scenarios you would never encounter with any financial institute.

      I'm too tired to look up any sources, but take a look at this google search.

    4. Re:Actually they are right by timbck2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hear hear! Paypal looks like a bank, acts like a bank, and quacks like a bank...therefore, it should be regulated like a bank, and held up to the same laws and legal scrutiny as any bank.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    5. Re:Actually they are right by isBandGeek() · · Score: 2, Funny

      So on top of the fee that they charge you for selling your item on eBay, they get to take another few percents off the buyer for using Paypal.

      Eventually, if they don't ban the other methods of payment, they would charge a few percents on using the other payment methods as an "inconvenience charge".

      Well, this is the beginning of the end of another good idea.

    6. Re:Actually they are right by timbck2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I actually received my money back (Paypal called it a "reversal") by filing a dispute against a deadbeat eBay seller through Paypal. I was really surprised, since the one or two other times I've had disputes with sellers, Paypal ALWAYS ruled against me.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    7. Re:Actually they are right by craash420 · · Score: 1

      PayPal is free for the buyer, they take their slice of the pie from the seller.

      --
      Extra medication for all!
    8. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember Billpoint.....ebay took care of that. 10% of my sales are check or money order. Bye Bye 10% of my sales....and by bye 10% of ebay fees, At a time when all businesses are looking for as many payment methods as possible to capture sales, ebay is chasing away business. You guys at the top of ebay aren't too bright

    9. Re:Actually they are right by guyminuslife · · Score: 5, Funny

      PayPal should be making subprime loans?

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    10. Re:Actually they are right by davester666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, this is the opposite tactic to what eBay tried to pull in Australia. There is was "you can only use paypal". Now they are trying the opposite, just to exclude everyone else BUT paypal.

      And yes, I did read the summary, which does mention they are permitting a couple of other methods right now. But is there any doubt as to which direction they want to go (as in, keep reducing the methods of payment until you can only use paypal)?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to those of others. * ARMONK, NY - Aug. 8,

      Whiners who are losers point out basic errors in other /.ers' sigs. My pleasure.

    12. Re:Actually they are right by FearForWings · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the seller will pass on a part that PayPal fee with higher shipping and handling fees.

      --
      I don't know about angles, but it's fear that gives men wings. -Max Payne
    13. Re:Actually they are right by Sancho · · Score: 1

      It's basically irrelevant. Both fees are taken into consideration by the seller, and the minimum bid is adjusted accordingly.

    14. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are too stupid to realize that the X+Y thing is a scam, then you probably need to either get bit in the ass by it or get off the internet.

    15. Re:Actually they are right by cheater512 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean the US should be more like Australia, where Paypal has to follow certain rules, just like a bank? :)

    16. Re:Actually they are right by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

      PayPal is free for the buyer, they take their slice of the pie from the seller.

      When did this change? I had the misfortune of trying to set up a Paypal account a few years ago - as a buyer on eBay - and when they tried to charge me to use my account to buy something, I canceled and haven't looked back. I do hear that it is worse for sellers, but I have refused to buy from any seller that uses Paypal exclusively and have told many of them why. Amway looks trustworthy in comparison.

      Based on the horror stories that keep popping up concerning problems people have had using this so-called 'protected' service, cash by mail actually seems safer. Until they get regulated like a bank, my money will never pass through their hands. By moving down the path towards requiring only Paypal - and nobody can argue that's not where they're leading - they're just trying to take a bigger cut of each sale while eliminating competition at the same time. I guess eBay doesn't want me as a customer anymore.

    17. Re:Actually they are right by chrb · · Score: 5, Informative

      it should be regulated like a bank, and held up to the same laws and legal scrutiny as any bank.

      It is - in Europe Paypal is a licensed, regulated bank based in Luxembourg.

    18. Re:Actually they are right by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      eBay now restricts shipping and handling fees to a certain amount depending on the category.

      feeBay indeed.

    19. Re:Actually they are right by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By moving down the path towards requiring only Paypal - and nobody can argue that's not where they're leading - they're just trying to take a bigger cut of each sale while eliminating competition at the same time. I guess eBay doesn't want me as a customer anymore.

      Both buyers and sellers are free to try other auctioners, heck Amazon also as auctions just as there are other online auctions. If eBay tries to get everybody to use Paypal, then like you others may stop using eBay.

      Falcon

    20. Re:Actually they are right by machine321 · · Score: 1

      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times... wait, what?

    21. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in addition to the percentage they take for selling your item, they take another percentage from you for... selling... your item... hey wait!

    22. Re:Actually they are right by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Maybe I've been lucky..(knock wood)...I've bought things on eBay using both checks and money orders as well as PayPal. I've never had any problems with any method. I sent my $$, and got my product.

      I kinda doubt that the US DOJ will move on this....heck, they'd really like to better track all the $$ going through eBay, and having it all funneled through one computerized system will just make it easier to find a way to tax you on your sales.

      So much for making a little 'no tax' cash on the worlds largest garage sale.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:Actually they are right by WTF+Chuck · · Score: 1

      If you are a seller that has a web-site outside of e-bay, you don't necessarily get to adjust your minimum bid or buy it now price. Yes, you will have on all your receipts, packaging, whatever your website address and you will let the eBay buyers know, with the receipts/paperwork shipped with the order what other things you offer on your site. The eBay stuff is just a teaser to push people to your web-site. You don't want eBay prices lower because it just pushes your customer to the more expensive portal. If your eBay prices are higher, it pisses off any potential return customers that will only see you as gouging eBayers (is that a word) and you loose all future business from them. Loose loose situation for sure.

      --
      Note - Liberal use of <sarcasm> tags may or may not need to be applied.
    24. Re:Actually they are right by socsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That may be, but they aren't FDIC insured in the states.

    25. Re:Actually they are right by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "Hear hear! Paypal looks like a bank, acts like a bank, and quacks like a bank...therefore, it should be regulated like a bank, and held up to the same laws and legal scrutiny as any bank."

      Two words: Money laundering and tax evasion. That's why paypal is so 'beloved'.

    26. Re:Actually they are right by Bobby+Mahoney · · Score: 1

      Standards, shmandards. Banning competing anything from a competitor doesn't need an excuse. Why would/should ebay want to offer something that would primarily help it's competitors. Were I ebay/paypal, not only would i not offer said pay methods, i'd be allocating significant resources to pushing out of the market said alternative pay methods. I know there's some anti-business/management- around here, but for flick sake, try to have some sense of free market and property rights.

      --
      !#&*
    27. Re:Actually they are right by Bobby+Mahoney · · Score: 1

      Well... no, no, and no. foremost; paypal is not a bank, even though to a consumer it might seem to exhibit similar traits- a bank it is not. Besides that, a bank's not required to accept Paypal or Checkout, or even Visa or Mastercard for that matter. Were paypal re-classified as a true-blue bank, it still would not merit regulation of what methods of payments were involved (aside from cash and govt. securities) - it's strictly a marketing decision for the bank.

      --
      !#&*
    28. Re:Actually they are right by Macthorpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I doubt you'd find many people that would argue that eBay is not a monopoly in the online auction area, and the rules change when you're a monopoly for a good reason. You're specifically not allowed to use a monopoly in one area (online auction provider) to kill competition in another (online payment processing).

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    29. Re:Actually they are right by blahplusplus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I meant two things... ahh well lol.

    30. Re:Actually they are right by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      I've done a LOT of buying and selling on eBay. I have never once had a problem sending or receiving checks/money orders. This is yet another stupid bullshit move by eBay. Add it to the massive pile of stupidity that company has been foisting upon it's users. I'm a power seller approaching 1000 feedback, but I will gladly jump ship to a viable alternative if someone can snag the market share. Google Auctions? Please, Google? Make it so.

    31. Re:Actually they are right by vought · · Score: 1

      That doesn't excuse banning competing payment systems, however, especially ones that meet the same standard as Paypal.

      You have them all wrong. This is just part of the Whitman Plan (TM) of customer alienation.

      Making it easier and easier to unload containers full of junk for ten years - that's eBay!

    32. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paypal is a bank.

      At least Paypal Europe is a bank, has a bank license in Luxembourg and is supervised like a bank.

      If the US is letting paypal act like a bank without a bank license... well it's no so surprising.

    33. Re:Actually they are right by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, some people fall for the fake check scams... But those people could fall for any kind of stupid scam.
      Most people will only ship the item when the check has cleared, and if the check is for the wrong amount they will know its a scam and destroy it or hand it to the cops.

      Some people don't have and can't get credit cards or bank accounts, but anyone can get a money order, and for some people that's the only way to buy anything without having to use cash.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    34. Re:Actually they are right by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, paypal's system sounds all nice if you never have to make use of any of their "protection" programs...

      If you know how to play the system you can get away with fraud quite easily with paypal's backing... For instance:

      Paypal will not refund people who bought a service as opposed to a physical item, even if that service was never provided and you never had any intention of providing it.

      A friend of mine rented a colocated server one friday a few weeks ago, from a business seemingly US based that promised to have your server up and running within 24 hours and claimed to offer 24/7 support.
      He heard nothing from them until monday when he got an email from someone in the UK saying they don't work weekends, but that he would get straight on it as a priority...
      On the wednesday he contacted again, and they told him it was in progress...
      On the following friday they said the server would be ready "very soon"...
      On the second following tuesday he discovered that he had already been entered into the billing cycle starting from the date he paid, and that he was effectively paying for the previous week and a half when he had no service.
      On the second following friday he tried to call them, they hung up on him and refused to answer subsequent calls. He emailed asking for a refund and was told they "don't issue refunds"
      So he filed a paypal dispute, the seller immediately escalated this to a full claim with the comment "transaction was for a monthly server rental, not a physical good" so they clearly know how to game the system...
      Luckily my friend paid with a credit card, so he was able to dispute the charge on his card and get his money back.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    35. Re:Actually they are right by dkone · · Score: 1

      So much for making a little 'no tax' cash on the worlds largest garage sale.

      That is the misconception that Ebay would like you to have. That is what they used to be, quaint homey, like a big 'garage' sale. That is not what they have become, they are just another mega-corp that has one thing in mind. Growth.

      DK

    36. Re:Actually they are right by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      a licensed, regulated bank based in Luxembourg.

      I've got a very nice bridge you might be interested in buying.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    37. Re:Actually they are right by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard they usually rule against both; the buyer doesn't get a refund and the vendor has his account swept.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:Actually they are right by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I concur with that statement and will add a bit more.
      I believe by limiting your choices you take away a slew of individuals
      that will want to pay using means they know is safe such as money orders.
      Paypal is hackable, you can't hack a cheque.
      The money orders and cheques do not provide Ebay with a cut as does paypal, this is pretty sick if you ask me.

    39. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paypal has to abide by all the same elements of Federal Reserve Regulation E, same as a bank. Back when x.com owned it, they tried to say they didn't have to abide by reg E. They were wrong and it cost them millions. But this thread is way out of date, the complaints about Paypal go back years before ebay owned them. ebay agreed that they had to abide by all the elements of reg E, and as far as I know, they have.

    40. Re:Actually they are right by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      As a long term PayPal user, I have never ever been charged a fee by PayPal for buying - and that's in something like 8 years now. Never been the case.

    41. Re:Actually they are right by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Good luck when something goes wrong. As the result of a single incident with Paypal, I will avoid dealing with them, or any company that wants to trade using them.

      If you use a cheque, you get all sorts of protection, like if your bank thinks it's fraud, they call the police. PayPal's attitude: "you're screwed, tough luck".

    42. Re:Actually they are right by PawNtheSandman · · Score: 0

      Power Seller? They been begging me for years to join. Is it worth the extra hassle for the "benefits" you supposedly receive? My main reason for not becoming a Power Seller is taxes.

    43. Re:Actually they are right by jimthehorsegod · · Score: 1

      In fact, PayPal (Europe) Ltd. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom as an electronic money institution. NOT as a bank. Big difference. For one thing it doesn't cover anything for balances over £1000

    44. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately I've seen this from the other perspective: I sell an item, the buyer claims it's late/signifigantly not as described two days after I ship it (and long before they actually get it). PaypalEbay takes the money back and gives it to the buyer. Buyer refuses to return item. I lose the item and the money, and they get the item for free. Great.

    45. Re:Actually they are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ebay and Paypal have always worked arm-in-arm. Ebay Owns paypal! This is an effort to move all that business over to paypal, where they make insane amounts of $$ off of their ACH (they don't really do so hot in their cc though, BELIEVE me).

    46. Re:Actually they are right by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      PayPal should be making subprime loans?

      NOBODY should be making subprime loans. That should have been an oxymoron.

    47. Re:Actually they are right by chrb · · Score: 1
      According to this article in the Telegraph, PayPal moved to Luxembourg and became a bank.

      Whether they're still regulated by the FSA is an interesting question. they claim to be. However, this may just be a relic of the pre-Luxembourg organisation, or it may be a way of avoiding the need to be re-approved as an e-money issuer.

      E-Money balances aren't covered by any form of insurance or security - the FSA e-money sourcebook states that companies must invest in high-security bonds etc., but ultimately a company could go bust and their users would have no more claim on their holdings than any other creditor. The £1000 amount is just an upper limit on an account balance before they have to tell you, and you have to agree that you know, that you have no right to compensation. You have no right to compensation anyway (ELM section 1.5) - the notification regulation is just there to limit the losses of those people who would claim that they never knew.

    48. Re:Actually they are right by chrb · · Score: 1
      Actually it looks like that page about the FSA probably is a relic - from Paypal Lux migration FAQ:

      What is the change to PayPal and my account? PayPal was granted a bank license with the Luxembourg bank authority. Under this license, PayPal will be regulated centrally by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), the Luxembourg bank authority. On 2 July 2007, your customer relationship will be automatically transferred from PayPal (Europe) Ltd. to PayPal Luxembourg.

      So, Paypal (Europe) Ltd. may well have an e-money license, but you aren't a customer of them anymore :-)

    49. Re:Actually they are right by catogtp · · Score: 1

      This is a sideways move towards allowing only Paypal transactions to be made in the US - they're testing the water and seeing how far they can push it.

      If paypal is the standard we are all doomed.

  2. If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere else by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The more restrictions they put on their service, the less interest I have in using it.

    I liked the good old days of ebay where you could buy a few sparc stations and then drive over to a guys house and give him cash for them. (craigslist has filled that void)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  3. Profit??? by Widowwolf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Since the promlems in austrilla, paypal just beign a worthless system lately and with this new help from ebay, and fees rising ata higher percentage of gas, tell me how anyone makes any money off ebay anymore?

    --
    ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    1. Re:Profit??? by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah gotta reply to this to give myself a smack over the head for horrific misspellings....Here is my slashdot card..

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    2. Re:Profit??? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

      have you considered a career as a /. editor?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Profit??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you considered a career as a /. editor?

      He's already failed.

      He only posted his first fucked-up post once.

    4. Re:Profit??? by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      Just for you! Since the promlems in austrilla, paypal just beign a worthless system lately and with this new help from ebay, and fees rising ata higher percentage of gas, tell me how anyone makes any money off ebay anymore?..




      Can i have my fat cushy job now with all sorts of products to test for free!

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  4. Improvement at e-bay by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Basically paypal and e-bay are ridicuously bad about protecting people from scams.

    However this is a move in the right direction. Recently they put a 30 day escrow on pay pal payments. Which they should have done years ago.

    Now it's much safer to shop.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Improvement at e-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, now you can claim that you were "hacked", and get your money back, AND get the item that was already shipped! Awesome!

    2. Re:Improvement at e-bay by brady8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure they did it for our benefit. Collecting 30 days of interest on hundreds of thousands of dollars probably doesn't factor into it at all.

    3. Re:Improvement at e-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know how their escrow accounts works, but i was under the impression that escrow was non-interest-bearing.

      that's how it is for the escrow payments i include with my mortgage to cover insurance and tax bills, and i was told by a mortgage broker that it is illegal for the mortgage company to make interest on the money they're holding in escrow.

    4. Re:Improvement at e-bay by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      What's that interest these days? Half a percent per year?

    5. Re:Improvement at e-bay by marxmarv · · Score: 1

      Not if you're in the consumer credit business as well.

      --
      /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
    6. Re:Improvement at e-bay by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      Even a consumer can get 3.00% in a traditional savings account (ING / Orange, for one). If you are willing to lock up money into a CD you can get just over 4% (with monthly roll-overs I'm sure PayPal could manage that). A corporation should be able to manage slightly better than that, even with the current economic issues.
      Whether that wil l keep you ahead of inflation is another topic.
      Locking an account into escrow is a money grab (0% interest), as is restricting everyone to use their in-house payment + fee service.

    7. Re:Improvement at e-bay by WTF+Chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mortgage companies and banks. You are talking about 2 regulated industries of which PayPal and eBay belong to neither.

      --
      Note - Liberal use of <sarcasm> tags may or may not need to be applied.
    8. Re:Improvement at e-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the bedrock of profits in the credit industry (e.g., Visa) has always been making money off of the float - the money held temporarily while in transition from one party to another - right? That's exactly what they're doing here. Odds are they will move the float from liquid assets into an investment portfolio much like an insurance company uses - albeit they may wait until a few months into a short term recovery, when they call it "safe." Ebay has moved from being a service provider - an auction house - to being a financial firm, one which needs more regulation and oversight.

    9. Re:Improvement at e-bay by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      i was told by a mortgage broker that it is illegal for the mortgage company to make interest on the money they're holding in escrow.

      Sure they "make interest on the money". In fact, you're the one paying it. If you didn't have to pay that money into escrow, it'd go toward your principal, and lower the interest you pay on the loan.

    10. Re:Improvement at e-bay by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Yes. I considered doing a clean-up of surplus equipment in my room (there was a fair bit) but after realizing that I have to provide about 1/3 money upfront and then just hope it actually sells. And then wait for 30 days to actually start process of getting anything out of my paypal account to somewhere where it is useful. No thanks. Craiglist is full of scamers annobody actually uses it.

      I just dumped it. About 1000 USD of present value. My time is simply worth more.

  5. Goodbye Ebay by das3cr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You won't find me bidding nor buying on Ebay again.

    I've never had a pay-pal account and this isn't going to drive me to one. I've never had a problem with sending money orders.

    --
    Hurricane Island Outward Bound
    OB
  6. 1. Checks and Money Orders by Yer+Mum · · Score: 1

    2. Wait a year.

    3. Knock direct credit payments to the seller and payment upon pickup on the head.

    4. Profit!

    Who says they haven't learnt from what happened in Australia.

  7. So... by Coopjust · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Other than payment upon pickup, you have to accept a payment method with 5-10% transaction fees. Internet merchant accounts take time to setup, so most sellers will switch to PayPal. Might make them more money in the long term, but I think it's another move that will alienate sellers from eBay.

    1. Re:So... by DaveWick79 · · Score: 1

      Unlike Ebay's other recent moves which really have only upset sellers, this one stands to upset both buyers and sellers. Granted, I use paypal on ebay and I always have, so I'm not really affected. But the company who pisses off both vendor and buyer is not one that is successful in the long term. It seems that the more ebay tweaks their system, the less profitable it becomes, and that prompts more tweaking. My advice to ebay - go back to what made you successful in the first place, and stop worrying about eclipsing growth records. The Internet is not growing at the pace it used to be, neither is the economy growing at rapid fire pace. Be happy with the business you have because it's going to cost you far more to get it back once you've lost it.

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if the buyer has a PayPal account that they keep money in; and the seller is *NOT* a commercial seller, then there is no fee.

      But that's a VERY small percentage.

    3. Re:So... by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      Well put.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    4. Re:So... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      You tell a coporation to not grow? That's like telling a cab driver to do his job without a car. Growth is the sole raison d' être for a corporation.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  8. Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by h2oliu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many may not remember, but when Sears first came out with the Discover card, they stopped accepting Visa/Mastercard.

    Sales dropped, and it was the beginning of the end for Sears.

    Those who don't study history....

    --
    Ok, I give up, why you?
    1. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the beginning of the end for Sears was when they started selling all those crappy Kenmore appliances in the 70s.

    2. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to do Geography instead, and man did I ever suck at it.

    3. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Those who fail geography are condemned to live in the US of A.
       

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...are usually business managers.

    5. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or at least they *think* they do...

    6. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Sears never accepted credit cards at all until 10 years after everyone else did. First they would only accept their their own Sears credit card, then the Discover card, and only much later Visa and Mastercard. I can't tell you how many times I started to buy something at Sears only to remember that I didn't have my check book with me.

      However the thing that killed Sears was their outdated inventory system that was always at least 45 days out of date.

    7. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Sales dropped, and it was the beginning of the end for Sears.

      Sears was on a severe decline long before the Discover card was even introduced.

      And "the end"? Sears stores around here are doing quite well. It's certainly not the behemoth it was in the 1970s, but it's a long way from "the end".

      In fact I'd put Sears as the only brick and mortar retailer I actually trust today... I'd be perfectly happy buying some no-name appliance from Sears, while I wouldn't even think about touching some no-name appliance in a Wal-Mart.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Sears? Oh right, that subsidiary of Kmart. What an unglamorous end, becoming a blue light special.

    9. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact I'd put Sears as the only brick and mortar retailer I actually trust today...

      ...and wouldn't think of buying hand tools anywhere else. Can't tell you how many ratchets I've gone through over the years.

    10. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      CostCo only accepts AmEx and they're doing ok...

    11. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      CostCo only accepts AmEx and they're doing ok...

      As far as true credit cards, yes. But I use my Visa debit card there all the time.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    12. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flipside was that other retailers were afraid to accept Discover since it was essentially a product offered by a competitor. There was no incentive to take the card and actually some valid business reasons to avoid it.

      This led to the famous saying "Get Discover Card and have fun Discovering where the hell you can use it!"

      Things are different now that Sears no longer owns the card.

    13. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you are like so many US Americans-just in need of one or more maps.

    14. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by cbmeeks · · Score: 1

      Amen brother! I vowed to never sell on eBay again. I sold a $29.95 motherboard and eBay took about $4 and PayPal took about $0.50. Really eats into the "profit". Even after I charged $14.95 to ship it, the box/tape cost $4 and postage was $9. I will never sell on eBay again. My only problem now is where to find Commodore/Atari stuff. But even that's starting to suck on eBay.

      --
      Remember, licking doorknobs is illegal on other planets.
    15. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2

      ...and wouldn't think of buying hand tools anywhere else. Can't tell you how many ratchets I've gone through over the years.

      Perhaps that's a sign that you should be buying somewhere else. Or maybe buying a better brand.

      Out of curiosity, what are you doing with your ratchets that you need to replace them so often that you've lost count of how many times you've had to buy new ones?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    16. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      In fact I'd put Sears as the only brick and mortar retailer I actually trust today... I'd be perfectly happy buying some no-name appliance from Sears, while I wouldn't even think about touching some no-name appliance in a Wal-Mart.

      I like Sears better than Walmart, but Walmart has one big advantage over Sears, at least in my area.

      It still exists. :(

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:Sears-Discover debacle anyone? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Wait, there is something UNDER K-Mart?!?!? Good Christ, that's like being the a prison bitch's *assistant*.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. I love to say this. by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Google wanted, they could launch an e-bay competitor.

    1. Re:I love to say this. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      Google should build an ebay competitor, this seems really ripe for one. I stopped using ebay and now use craigslist or network and do not know a single person that is currently happy using them and most have outright stopped using ebay.

    2. Re:I love to say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Google wanted, they could launch an e-bay competitor.

      I've been hoping for a competing auction site from Google for years now. eBay has integrated so many senseless 'features' in the past two years that work directly against the sellers, it's sad. I would like nothing more than to see a proper competitor come along--Google could do it!

    3. Re:I love to say this. by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      well, there is froogle, google base, and google checkout. None of which have any mind share, in the public or within google.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:I love to say this. by swabeui · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. The average user doesn't change often and tend to follow the 'if it ain't broke...' mantra. Google tends to take hold by crushing the norm (Gmail, Maps and of course Search). Craigslist and eBay pretty much have it covered, so I don't think there is much room here. (I'd love to be wrong though).

      Now... that said, an auction site with no transaction fee's (funded by ad revenue)... the average user DOES change in matters of the wallet.

    5. Re:I love to say this. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, eBay has patented many of the concepts required for an online auction site.

      For example, the concept of an online auction. The concept of "reserve" in an online auction. The concept of "Buy it now" in an online auction.

      And other such concepts. Google could build an online sales site, but they would be restrained in many ways from trying to be at all like eBay, without incurring the wrath of hordes of lawyers.

    6. Re:I love to say this. by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Would you want an ad for another product on your auction page?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    7. Re:I love to say this. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Pfffft. If Google wanted, they could buy eBay. After all, their market cap is less than a 1/4 of GOOG.

    8. Re:I love to say this. by swabeui · · Score: 1

      If I'm not paying any fees (both for listing or for accepting payment), no I wouldn't mind what-so-ever. I have been OK with Google displaying ads for competing websites when people search for mine for a decade now :)

    9. Re:I love to say this. by Christoph · · Score: 1

      I set up a Google Checkout account a year ago to let clients pay invoices using a credit card. I never promoted it, but in the past few months, more clients have been using it.

      I am hoping mindshare grows more, I reluctantly tried PayPal and hated it, but love Google Checkout.

    10. Re:I love to say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google could launch a competitor, but not everything google does is gold. Remember google video? They were around before youtube and youtube kicked their ass.

      You think a google auction house will beat ebay? remember amazon and yahoo tried to start auction houses? They got their asses kicked by ebay.

      Remember orkut? ass kicked by "social-network-of-the-day"

      also, ebay tried to do this to paypal before they bought paypal and got their ass kicked.

      not everything google produces is gold. Some of it is shit, but most of you sheeple eat their shit and love them for it.

    11. Re:I love to say this. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      http://www.graysonline.com.au/ is a standard auction house that went live.
      They use everything that you mention.
      There are ebay clones out there as well that also use the same methods.
      Grays online doesn't use a 'buy it now', principally because it's a real auction site.
      In other news, Ebay is trying to promote buy it now much more than auctions, trying to turn itself into an on-line retailer using shopfronts for stock and drop offs. They hold no stock, don't involve themselves in distribution. They just list and make profit.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    12. Re:I love to say this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gbay?

    13. Re:I love to say this. by dword · · Score: 1

      It seems they've tried that about three years ago but I guess it didn't went well, considering that after three years they still don't have a product.
      http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-auctions-to-rival-ebay-and-yahoo/2322/

    14. Re:I love to say this. by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      And wouldn't it be great when the eBay people complained that Google Auctions was unfairly not allowing PayPal?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    15. Re:I love to say this. by cliffski · · Score: 1

      no thanks, google dominate too much of the interweb as it is. I see no benefit in them expanding further, unless you are a google shareholder.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    16. Re:I love to say this. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You think a google auction house will beat ebay? remember amazon and yahoo tried to start auction houses? They got their asses kicked by ebay.

      You're right, not everything Google does is gold, but they've done a lot better than Yahoo.

      Besides, when others tried competing with Ebay and lost, Ebay was a lot younger (privately owned at the time too, IIRC), had lower fees, didn't own Paypal, and hadn't pissed so many people off. It's possible someone might be able to make a serious Ebay competitor now.

  10. Don't use paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If payment options are ever limited to Paypal, then I won't be using EBay.

    Little known fact: Paypal "reserves the right" to reverse a transaction without permission from the seller. That's what backs their money-back guarantee.

    I sold an item which went to a woman in CA, it arrived damaged in transit. I worked on processing the insurance claim, but she didn't want to wait, and made a claim to paypal. They reversed the transaction, she shipped the item back, and received money from them which they billed me for. I refused to pay, so they kept money from another transaction that I made during this time.

    So now I have a broken item that's been to CA and back, I can't make an insurance claim since it's since been shipped again by a different carrier, and paypal is sending me to collections since I refuse to pay for a return they authorized, not me.

    1. Re:Don't use paypal by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      well known fact: Credit card companies will do the same thing. But they'll also tack on a chargeback fee.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Don't use paypal by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Considering PayPal wants access to my bank account in order for me to purchase anything through their service, I absolutely refuse to do business with merchants who only take PayPal. Why would anybody trust a company like PayPal with their bank account details?

      Now that I can't pay for items via Money Orders, I'll be even less inclined to purchase stuff through eBay.

      eBay is in serious need of competition.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    3. Re:Don't use paypal by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I've been to "collections" by PayPal before. Ignore them. They're not real 'collections' people (at least in the past they weren't)

    4. Re:Don't use paypal by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      Considering PayPal wants access to my bank account in order for me to purchase anything through their service, I absolutely refuse to do business with merchants who only take PayPal. Why would anybody trust a company like PayPal with their bank account details?

      That's why I opened up a credit union account just for PayPal in which I keep a checking account balance of $1. Let them siphon that off if they want.

    5. Re:Don't use paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is Brandon Crotts, I am the product Manager at ProPay. We're really excited that ProPay has been added to the list of acceptable payments on eBay. We're extremely concerned about protecting sellers and we have several features that will protect our customers against fraud. Hopefully this is an appealing option for you. If you want more details on Propay check us out at ProPay.com.

    6. Re:Don't use paypal by fallen1 · · Score: 1

      I try not to use PayPal at all, but I did what another poster suggested - I set up a bank account for PayPal only. I leave enough in there to cover the basic check account charges for 6 months and anytime I must use PayPal I scoop the money out of that account and into another. They can lock that PayPal account or try to reverse it all they want, all I'll do is tell my account manager that that account needs to be closed due to PayPal trying to defraud me of money I legally collected by trying to reverse a charge that I did not authorize them to reverse. Banks have the power of the Fed backing them up so PayPal can suck it.

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

  11. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by ghoti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't mind using PayPal, but I really hate the fact that the site is swamped with commercial vendors rather than people selling stuff they don't need any more. eBay needs to be split into a marketplace where you can go to buy new things (like Amazon), and the good old auctioning of used personal stuff. Until they do that, they won't see me again.

    --
    EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
  12. ebay is no longer my first choice by CaptainNerdCave · · Score: 0, Redundant
    with the changes to their layout (making it bulky and slow) and the big changes to their feedback system (no negative feedback for buyers? that's crap), ebay is no longer the place that i start my search for hard-to-find hardware and merchandise.

    i agree, the more restrictions ebay applies, the more i look elsewhere

  13. The Former U.S.A : +1, Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We are all comrades now in the U.S.S.A.

    No checks or money orders in U.S.S.A. because there are NO banks.

    P.S.: In case you've been reading Slashot too much,
    General Motors will announce bankruptcy. They're drawing on U.S. $ 3.5 billion of their last U.S. $ 5.5 billion
    line of credit.

    Cordially,
    Comrade Kilgore Trout

  14. New company motto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "just send us money". They decided it'd be easier to avoid auctions all together and require users to send a portion of their income to Ebay through Paypal.

  15. Gettin' yer thrills from bidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't for the life of me understand why so many people continue to waste their time using eBay. What exactly is the appeal of going through a bidding process to end up paying over retail prices on stuff that may not ever even get shipped by whatever douche happens to be scamming at the moment?

    1. Re:Gettin' yer thrills from bidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that eBay is still a good place to get commodity items cheap, provided that one is willing to invest 2-3 minutes comparison-shopping (for this I use eBay itself as well as Google shopping). The one time (out of over 100 purchases) I got screwed by a seller, I got my money back from PayPal.

      I would hasten to add, though, that eBay is no place for the unwary and/or unthinking.

    2. Re:Gettin' yer thrills from bidding? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't for the life of me understand why so many people continue to waste their time using eBay. What exactly is the appeal of going through a bidding process to end up paying over retail prices on stuff that may not ever even get shipped by whatever douche happens to be scamming at the moment?

      Ebay was, is, and will continue to be for the foreeable future a good place to purchase difficult to find collectibles at reasonable prices.

      This includes used books, board games / table top games / role playing games / collectible card games, used toys (lego, playmobil, fisher price, construx, action figures, etc...), console video games and systems, etc.

      Its not so much that you get them 'cheap', but you do get them for a fair market price, instead of either not being able to find them at all, or paying the monopolistic pricing that a local collector shop will charge. (I've seen used out of print paperbacks books listed at $50-$100 in local bookstores... they know they've got the only copy easily found for sale within 1000 miles... but you can often get the same book for $10-15 on ebay, if you search regularly.

      Another example would be the famous lego "Yellow Castle" or "Galaxy Explorer" sets. There's often a couple up for auction on ebay, and finding them elsewhere can be downright impossible unless you are willing to spend ridiculous amounts of cash.

      The other area ebay is alright is getting small new items with high retail markup. They tend to go on ebay for much lower markup and you can get good deals even after S&H and fees. (Although you can generally get them for the same price online elsewhere.)

    3. Re:Gettin' yer thrills from bidding? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "What exactly is the appeal of going through a bidding process to end up paying over retail prices on stuff that may not ever even get shipped by whatever douche happens to be scamming at the moment?"

      Well, first, you stop being an idiot and paying more than retail price. If you know what you're looking for....know the price that it would be a good deal at, and not bid more than that....you can get some interesting items, at a good deal.

      And if it is too good a deal to be true...it is likely a scam. With research on the product and the seller, it is usually easy to tell if it is legit or not.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Gettin' yer thrills from bidding? by vitaflo · · Score: 1

      "Its not so much that you get them 'cheap', but you do get them for a fair market price, instead of either not being able to find them at all, or paying the monopolistic pricing that a local collector shop will charge. (I've seen used out of print paperbacks books listed at $50-$100 in local bookstores... they know they've got the only copy easily found for sale within 1000 miles... but you can often get the same book for $10-15 on ebay, if you search regularly."

      It goes both ways. As far as games go, eBay has totally ruined the local used game shop where I live. The local shop can't sell any game for less than what it would go for on eBay, otherwise they'd just be better off selling it there (and many times they do). Thus you get games like Final Fantasy VII, a game that sold millions of copies, going for close to $100 at the local game store, because it sells for $70-90 on eBay.

      The problem with the log tail with regards to resale is that if you have a small group of very fanatical consumers, it ends up driving up the price of everything at the local shops *simply because* the price is inflated on eBay, not necessarily because of actual local supply and demand.

    5. Re:Gettin' yer thrills from bidding? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I see your argument that 'it cuts both ways', but i disagree that the price is inflated on ebay, its the fair market value.

      The fact that it might be cheaper if your seller has to try to sell it to a tiny audience, and therefore has to lower his price in order to find a buyer is a distortion.

      The problem with the log tail with regards to resale is that if you have a small group of very fanatical consumers, it ends up driving up the price of everything at the local shops *simply because* the price is inflated on eBay, not necessarily because of actual local supply and demand.

      This is improbable. If there were really MILLIONS of copies up for grabs a 'small group of very fanatical consumers' will be rapidly satisfied and the price will fall. The only rationale for such high prices on ebay for a sustained period is that there are either a very small supply of copies, or that the "small group" of consumers is much larger than you've allowed for. After all, its not like this "small group of fanatics" is buying 100s of copies for themselves.

  16. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Itninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there anywhere else? Ebay used to be 'the garage sale to the world'. With in overwhelming amount of corporate sellers, now it's more like 'outlet mall to the world'. And Craigslist is just want-ads with zero protection offered or even implied. Putting an ad is the local paper is sounding more and more like the best option (at least for selling).

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  17. Great by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Just in time for the rumored layoffs at eBay. Not a good time to be cutting services. I can understand why but OTOH, PP has it's share of problems.

  18. What about cash? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that many people do it (it would require a lot of trust), but it shouldn't be eliminated completely as an option. Is that what the "payment upon pickup" is supposed to cover?

    1. Re:What about cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably.

      also, what's to stop a seller from selecting "payment upon pickup" and asking the buyer for a check or MO?

  19. They have to do this... by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The love affair with overpriced auction winnings is waning. More and more people are realizing that most of the stuff on ebay that you can get at your local store or at another retailer on the internet is usually ridiculously overpriced. The days of paying 105% of new price for used goods are over. This realization by the consumer is hurting ebay's bottom line. They are no longer growing at double digit percentages and I would argue trends show all growth will halt in less than a year. To continue to grow revenue they have to try to take a bigger cut of every sale. They have already raised prices so the next step is to take a cut of every payment transaction. That was the entire strategy with the paypal acquisition. It's simply been a matter of time before they ban every payment method other than paypal.

    The question is will there be a drop is use of the site as a result, or whether there will be a lawsuit. Ebay has always run into this issue that someday a lawyer is going to get everyone together who's been scammed and file a class action suit that targets them for all the things they could do to prevent fraud and don't. It's going to be a BIG lawsuit someday so the executives have it in mind to bump the stock price as much as possible and make sure they get their bonuses before the shit hits the fan. That and making sure there is still growth in a company where there is no growth.

    1. Re:They have to do this... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's going to be a BIG lawsuit someday so the executives have it in mind to bump the stock price as much as possible and make sure they get their bonuses before the shit hits the fan. That and making sure there is still growth in a company where there is no growth.

      You're quite correct apart from one thing. eBay has been trying to bump its stock price for the past 3 years -- totally unsuccessfully. It's almost half of what is was 3 years ago(prior to the Skype purchase debacle). It's a dead man walking, and has been for some considerable time. Meg Whitman, the prime architect of its demise, baled a rich woman some time back. Just in time to avoid be caught in the wake of the ship as it sinks.

    2. Re:They have to do this... by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The other side of the bad-news coin for eBay is that after it rationalized the collectors' market, pretty much everyone has gotten what they need. All the things I was willing to spend non-trivial amounts of money on (Infocom games, Apple II stuff, etc.), I have. I have nothing against eBay, I just have no reason to shop there anymore. My collections are complete, and I prefer to buy new things from real stores.

      Half.com is still pretty good for used stuff, though.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    3. Re:They have to do this... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      The love affair with overpriced auction winnings is waning. More and more people are realizing that most of the stuff on ebay that you can get at your local store or at another retailer on the internet is usually ridiculously overpriced. The days of paying 105% of new price for used goods are over.

      What? What are you talking about? Show me an action that sold for more than local store retail.

      The vast majority of eBay items are used merchandise.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:They have to do this... by vistic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think you pay attention to the overall market. The stock may be half what it was 3 years ago... but it's also half of what it was just in October of 2007 (less than a year ago).

      But then again, take a look at Google's stock... Yahoo's stock... Amazon's stock... really ANY tech stock.

      Glancing at a stock chart for a minute is meaningless if you don't understand what's been going on with the economy. All things considered, eBay's stock price isn't that bad compared to the rest of the market.

    5. Re:They have to do this... by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meg Whitman, the prime architect of its demise, baled a rich woman some time back.

      That is a fascinating financial strategy. Did she use a standard hay baler, or did she bale the woman by hand? Did the woman survive? Did Meg Whitman face any legal penalties for this?

      Forget my job, I'm just gonna bale me a rich woman!

    6. Re:They have to do this... by Trixter · · Score: 1

      "Show me an action that sold for more than local store retail."

      Two words: Neo Geo.

    7. Re:They have to do this... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      it doesn't help that they ban legal merchandise in order to be politically correct.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  20. The original idea of eBay is gone by PCPackrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    eBay has been going this route for a while. I don't see them backing down. I am in agreement that Craigslist is filling the void that eBay used to fill very well. Now it's just a bunch of 'PowerSellers' reselling product they don't even have. It was a nice flea market while it lasted, but they got big $$$ in their eyes and got greedy.

    For example, I sold an item for $150, final value fee was $12.35 and paypal took another $4.82. That's a good chunk of the sale when you are the one designing the auction page and putting the items up for sale. All in hope that the buyer isn't going to rip you off by reversing the charges after pretending they never got the item and you can't leave them negative feedback anymore.

    There is a need for a new auction site to open that is like eBay used to be.

    1. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by v1 · · Score: 1

      All in hope that the buyer isn't going to rip you off by reversing the charges after pretending they never got the item and you can't leave them negative feedback anymore.

      the problem was it was working the other way.

      My ONE and only negative as a buyer was when I bought a flash drive, which was defective on arrival, returned it to seller. (hong kong postage) and waited as I was stalled repeatedly by the seller, waiting for manufacturer to receive it, waiting for reply, etc. Until I realized I'd exhausted my ebay appeals time and was almost out of time to leave feedback. The DAY my ebay appeal time ran out he stopped replying to my emails.

      So, out the flash drive (now I can't even send it back since I don't have it anymore) and out the $150 for the drive plus postage again to HK, I left him (-). Immediately he retaliated by leaving me (-). So Not only was I out the auction price, I was out additional shipping, AND got a negative on my record.

      After this I read through his feedback, and percentage-wise it was very good, 98-99%. But he had so many auctions every week, he was getting 1-2 negatives a week. Every one of them was the same story as me... buyer leaves (-) for defective product no resolution, every time he would retaliate by leaving (-) to the buyer with the same "please contact me for resolution, unfair to leave negative feedback" as though the buyer was being unreasonable. Clearly this was how that seller handled defective product, and was sending a warning to buyers, "leave me a negative and you WILL get a negative for it".

      Behavior like this discourages the buyer from leaving a negative against the seller, and does nothing to encourage sellers to work hard for their reputation.

      I'm thankful for the policy change personally. I don't have to worry about getting that badly scammed again. A lot of that was my fault for expecting someone with 10k of (+) feedback to be honorable, but the final slap was definitely the mar on my record.

      And I'm saying this as a buyer AND a seller on ebay. I just sold a laptop on ebay.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that happened to me one time. I had sold a phone to a guy in Australia, and he said he never got it. Nevermind that USPS should have been liable, and not charge people for extortion to insure they actually ship what your shipping. It all worked out since I had a friend that lived there track him down and took pictures of him using it. I never got my money back, but I can sleep better at night knowing that his ass is rotting in a jail cell right now.

    3. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by Monsterdog · · Score: 1

      Curiously enough, I'm only a buyer, and the loss of seller ability to leave negative feedback pisses me off -- partly because it means more sellers than ever just don't bother leaving ANY feedback. Why should they? It's a joke. While I don't miss the possibility of revenge feedback from bad sellers (and just had one rip-off artist who would have done just that), I'm annoyed that eBay pretty much set it up so that buyers can screw up sellers very easily -- mess with the DSR to get it under 4.6, and a seller gets a thirty day suspension; leave negative feedback and once it hits a certain point, suspension. Selelrs can cover their asses by using tracking -- it comes automatically with UPS and similar shippers, and it's 45 cents at the USPS. Other buyer scams are easily foiled too. Hell, legitimate buyer complaints are easily foiled -- I've been rooked by scam artists using PayPal. In the short term eBay's apparently boneheaded moves are going to cost them...but if their plan is to become a huge shopping portal instead of an auction site, then making moves to dump all the smaller guys is exactly what they would do. It's entirely possible, however, that they're simply just screwed up.

    4. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Obligatory question: Why the heck did you buy a flash drive on eBay?

      Flash drives aren't hard to find items and they aren't unique.

      You can get them at great prices from retailers like NewEgg and TigerDirect, and not have to go through the hassle of waiting for product from *HONG KONG*!

      I'm sorry that you got ripped off; that sucks. But eBay is really only good for used stuff that's impossible to find anywhere else, like collectibles, etc. Not currently available stuff like flash drives!

    5. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by digital_rich · · Score: 0

      I just bought a couple arcade games on Craigslist. Got a better price too. I'd only trust it for local purchases though. There's way more creeps and criminals on Craigslist.

    6. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      For example, I sold an item for $150, final value fee was $12.35 and paypal took another $4.82. That's a good chunk of the sale when you are the one designing the auction page and putting the items up for sale. All in hope that the buyer isn't going to rip you off by reversing the charges after pretending they never got the item and you can't leave them negative feedback anymore. There is a need for a new auction site to open that is like eBay used to be.

      Exactly the feeling of a lot of the sellers on eBay. Look through the spectrum of the retail market and you'll see that 10% is a fairly good margin on most good sold. Between auction and Paypal fees, eBay is earning over 11% for doing nothing more than providing a venue. That makes for a crappy deal for sellers and buyers alike. Unfortunately, as eBay has a de facto monopoly on auctions in the US, what other choice do you have? So you do what many eBay sellers do... inflate your shipping and handling charge to cover some of the eBay fees.

      I pity people who buy new merchandise on eBay. If you do your research, you can always find new merchandise cheaper someplace else. The fee structure eBay imposes guarantees that non-affiliated resellers enjoy a 7-8% overhead advantage.

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    7. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by v1 · · Score: 1

      FWIW it was a newly released 16gb ADATA. At the time the only place they were available was on ebay, being sold by numerous vendors at about the same price. I intended on making a bootable flash drive. At the time their only competition was 40%-300% more expensive, and always physically larger.

      This was actually a replacement. My first 16 my cat decided to hide for me. (have yet to find it) Now I'm using a 8gb lexar firefly, love it. Lexar JUST released a 16 firefly, that's on my birthday list. (been waiting 1/2 yr for it!) Not from ebay either. I suspect the reason the myflash were not available in the "usual places" from the start was due to the high failure/doa rate.

      From what I've read, the early ADATA "myflash 16" were a crapshoot... either they work great or don't. My first one was fine. Second one would only successfully write to the first 8gb. (and it WAS a 16, just defective)

      ADATA had a warranty on it, but I was suckered into mailing it back to the ebay vendor (flashman852), and so I didn't even have that to try to return to the manufacturer. Owell, live and learn. Didn't sting TOO bad.

      flashman's feedback is now at over 330,000 so when you get to that point feedback doesn't really matter anymore. Giving someone like that a (-) is like throwing a pebble at a mountain. But when your own feedback is under 100, he can hit you with a pretty pointy stick.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    8. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I've had issues with ADATA flash drives too. A 4GB I gave to my girlfriend with my previous camera ended up having all kinds of issues. I felt kind of bad about it; luckily the cards are cheap now and easy to replace.

      Sandisk and Kingston is all I buy these days and they've been very dependable.

    9. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      I pity people who buy new merchandise on eBay. If you do your research, you can always find new merchandise cheaper someplace else. The fee structure eBay imposes guarantees that non-affiliated resellers enjoy a 7-8% overhead advantage.

      I'm glad someone pointed this out because I myself have noticed this recently as well.

      I buy a lot of (non-mainstream) music CDs and up to about six months ago, I was buying most of them on eBay. However, since that time, I don't think I've bought one on there - just because they're usually cheaper on Amazon Marketplace now. In fact, there are 2 or 3 CD sellers I regularly use who sell on both eBay and Amazon and whose prices are cheaper on the latter - presumably as a result of the excessive eBay fees that they have to cover.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    10. Re:The original idea of eBay is gone by v1 · · Score: 1

      I've had good luck with sandisk, but the lexar firefly has a few unique features that I'm shocked no one else is trying.

      Both are related to the cap, surprisingly. The lanyard attaches not to the flash drive, but to its cap. And the cap isn't the type that can be removed from the drive with a stiff breeze. It LOCKS onto the drive. (on either end) This is of course a requirement if the lanyard attaches to the cap.

      But this allows you to actually attach the lanyard down, either around your wrist, neck, or as I do, on my camera/ipod pouch on my belt. I then tuck the drive into the pouch when not in use. You could tie it to a belt loop and drop it into your pocket too.

      This creates several advantages. First, you don't have to untangle yourself from the flash drive to plug it in or step back from the computer. Second you don't lose the cap around day 2. Third, and most important for me, is how LOUD the cap is if left to flail around off my camera pouch when I am using the drive. It's made of a hard acrylic plastic, and I can't walk more than about 30 feet away from the computer I plugged the drive into without hearing the cap flapping around. This has saved me from forgetting my flash drive countless times. This single feature alone makes it my drive of choice. Before, my 4gb sandisk cruzer mini had been temporarily lost at least a dozen times, sometimes for days at a time, before I found the computer it was left in. (working at a school)

      It's also one of the highest capacity drives available, and is one of the physically smallest. The only thing it leaves me wanting for is a write protect switch.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  21. uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and every day, companies send million-dollar checks through regular US mail to each other. and the system actually works pretty well. for 47 cents, plus envelope , paper, and special laser cartridges, you can transfer a million dollars. try doing that on paypal, or setting up eletronic systems to do that, and now try to keep those systems secure. now try to do it for 47 cents per transaction.

    checks are dying, but they are not a horrible system. they work.

    what's really going on is this: meg whitman left ebay, now some 'genius' MBA has come in and said 'omg we are not screwing the customers enough. take away their freedom of choice, and change it into profit for us'.

    in other words: capitalists hate us for our freedom.

    1. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by Shikaku · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't believe you can send a check marked 1 million USD at all. I want proof. Please send me a working check worth 1 million USD, and I promise not to cash it in.

    2. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by nosretap · · Score: 1

      don't forget your transaction costs!!! How much does it cost YOU to process a cheque? There are lots of costs, Sending -Envolope ($0.10) -Stamp ($0.53) -Cheque ($?.??) -Time to print cheque ?.?? -Labour! (BIG BUCKS) Recieving -Internal routing (LABOUR) -Cheque reconsiliation (LABOUR) -Statement production (Matierials, labour etc.) The company I worked for figured that a cheque from AR/AP cost $50.00 to transact (and that was in the 90's). Manual transactions are costly and due to their nature, inherently vulnerable to error. My $0.02 worth! ;)

    3. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Why, Of course I can do that. No problem.

      Ummmm.. There is just the small hitch that my special toner cartridge has run out just now. But if you send me $299 do refill it, plus an addressed and stamped return envelope, I have your working $1.000.000 check in the return mail right away.

    4. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      Will do. Post your home address, full name, and cellphone number so that I can call and make sure it made it through....

    5. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      Ohh bad news the check I have from my client is for
      $1,300,000.00 but if you can cash the check and send me $200,000.00 ill let you keep the extra $100,000.00
      Please let me know asap

    6. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      in other words: capitalists hate us for our freedom.

      You process checks for a living, you apparantly love these checks and how they work, but you hate capitalism.

      What do you do for a living?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    7. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      don't forget your transaction costs!!! How much does it cost YOU to process a cheque?

      Well, I'm an accountant in the USA, and it takes about three times as much effort to process a debit card purchase as it does to process a check. Credit card purchases are a little easier, only takes about twice as much effort to process them.

      And that's only if the client has kept good records. With checks, they usually do, and if not they get an image of the check on their bank statement. But with credit cards they usually don't record the transaction at the time they make it, so they have to go back later to do this. And with debit cards if they didn't record the transaction in their check register at the time they made it (which they invariably don't), then their account is out of balance too.

      Now, the fact that you spelled it "cheque" and "labour" makes me think you're not living in the USA. From what I've heard Europe has much better electronic payment processing than the US.

    8. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Europe. I paid for some of my schooling working for an accounting/bookkeeping firm and it's exactly the same in Canada. And for good reason - electronic transactions tend to be very badly documented when the statements come in.

      See, to your average employee, cheques are money. And they look expensive and important - colorful, sometimes embossed, and always printed on nice thick paper with all sorts of official looking markings on them. So they tend to be carefully written, and carefully folded, and carried safely until they reach the bank. When they come back they're full of all sorts of useful information like the memo field, and the bank's stamp so you know what date it was processed on.

      Receipts, on the other hand, are fiddly little pieces of paper that people stuff into random pockets, hoping they'll remember to hand them to the office girl before they head out to the work site the next morning. They go missing. Sometimes you're lucky and they do get handed to the office girl, who then dutifully stuffs them into that week's/month's/quarter's (depending on the business) box (if, that is, the phone doesn't ring causing her to put them down somewhere where they'll be forgotten). If you're even luckier that box won't be placed next to a heater or left in a hot car (hooray for thermal paper receipts!). Super bonus points if they make it all the way to the accountant in one uncrumpled, unstained piece. When they don't, well, good luck figuring out whether "debit transaction, Costco" is an office expense, a pile of promotional gifts, or the owner forgetting the difference between his personal account and that of his business (this happens a lot).

      And this isn't Joe Random's home business. This is standard procedure for pretty much everything below the giant corporation with nation-wide operations level. Home builders, oil service companies, stores (not chains, but still pretty big companies), regional shipping companies - all of them the same. Obviously multi-million dollar transfers aren't going to be in the same category, but for a plethora of small expenses (that add up to a lot by year's end) this is just the way it goes.

    9. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by jimicus · · Score: 1

      and every day, companies send million-dollar checks through regular US mail to each other. and the system actually works pretty well. for 47 cents, plus envelope , paper, and special laser cartridges, you can transfer a million dollars. try doing that on paypal, or setting up eletronic systems to do that, and now try to keep those systems secure. now try to do it for 47 cents per transaction.

      Er... cough cough

    10. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i process checks for a living

      ...which probably explains why you sing their praises.

      Seriously, though, I'm from Europe, and we use wire transfers for this sort of thing. Why don't you? It costs nothing, it's absolutely reliable, and it doesn't carry any risk (no cheques getting lost in the mail and all that, no people intercepting your cheques, and so on).

    11. Re:uhm yeah. i process checks for a living by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      and every day, companies send million-dollar checks through regular US mail to each other. and the system actually works pretty well. for 47 cents, plus envelope , paper, and special laser cartridges, you can transfer a million dollars. try doing that on paypal, or setting up eletronic systems to do that, and now try to keep those systems secure. now try to do it for 47 cents per transaction.

      If you think the actual cost of fulfilling that transaction is 47 cents, you're way off base.

      The actual cost is far higher. Keep in mind that the issuer of that check pays the bank for the ability to issue that check. The bank makes money off the funds held for the check; the receiving entity's bank also makes money off the funds while it clears. Never mind the monthly fees both issuer and receiver pay on their accounts.

      Just because the cost of the transaction is hidden doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  22. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Jimmy+King · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm with you, man. Every few months I decide to scour eBay for something I don't want to pay full price for with the hope that I'll find the one true, used, item from a normal person in the middle of all of the "new for the same price or more than it costs at a store, plus shipping, plus you have to wait for it to arrive" crap.

    Every time I do that, I end up spending the next hour ranting to my wife (seriously, for real, I have one of those) about how eBay has gone to hell and it's just a bunch of overpriced, new products now instead of used stuff.

  23. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by SlowGenius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But there really aren't a lot of "somewhere elses", other than craigslist, at least, not in a realistic sense. And craigslist is only an okay option for people who are happy selling locally at a fixed price (or perhaps "best offer", if you want to be technical about it.)

    Other than that... hmm. Certainly there are a whole myriad of tiny itty-bitty auction sites out there (I would guess), but aside for some very narrow specialty niches, ebay enjoys an incredible barrier-to-entry advantage in the auction-house market. Why? Because when selling, just about everybody wants the biggest possible market for their wares. Hence, just about everybody goes to the biggest market. Duh.

    This will not change until/unless eBay shoots itself in the foot by getting so greedy on sales commissions that they manage to piss off a critical mass of people. And even then, they'll still enjoy enough of a natural advantage that they can just back off a percentage point, wipe out their fledgling upstart competitor, and carry on as before.

    --
    Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
  24. Buh bye fleabay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a once-in-a-while seller, all I can say is: NO FUCKING WAY.

    I smell a boycott.

    1. Re:Buh bye fleabay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > As a once-in-a-while seller, all I can say is: NO FUCKING WAY.

      +1 Flamebait, if there ever was one.

      (Posted as an AC to preserve my mod points.)

    2. Re:Buh bye fleabay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You smell a boycott. The rest of us jumped ship years ago.

  25. alternatives by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    As Ebay increases restrictions they're increasingly excluding their own customer base. Where are these people going instead? Another comment mentioned Craigslist; and there are specialty auction sites (gunbroker.com is one I'm familiar with) that handle categories Ebay specifically excludes. But are there any general auction sites that are getting more popular as Ebay declines?

  26. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    eBay needs to be split into a marketplace where you can go to buy new things (like Amazon), and the good old auctioning of used personal stuff. Until they do that, they won't see me again.

    Ebay IS split into a "market place" (ebay stores) and an "auction". The trouble is the marketplace people want visibility in the auction side and so flood the auctions with their stuff.

    And then on top of that there are the boatloads of garbage sellers, who just stuff the auctions with worthless crap that never sells... 'guides' and crap like that. And the people with scammy sounding auctions...

    "I will randomly pack a few valueable items into one of 500 lots of near worthless items" buy a lot of lots and hope you get lucky!

    Of course there is no accountability that any of the 500 lots ever had the valuable item in the first place...

  27. Checks okay, but money orders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...every major purchase I've made on eBay was with a postal money order. Why? Because they're convenient and federally protected - if the seller frauds me they're in trouble with the postmaster general.

    Shame to see them cut this - I guess I won't ever buy anything big off eBay again.

  28. Already switched to Amazon by greenreaper · · Score: 1

    I tried eBay for a few recent purchases but I found that Amazon was winning most of the time - either with its own stock or through third-party sellers. The marketplace is far more efficient for buyers - you don't have to wait for auctions that you might or might not win to complete. eBay might still be the best place for unusual or one-of-a-kind items - I've seen certain out-of-print titles go for far less than the offers on Amazon - but for most things it's just not worth my time.

    1. Re:Already switched to Amazon by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      just out of interest, have you heard anything bad about Marketplace? I'm thinking of joining up to sell some computer books (I will not use eBay or Paypal).

    2. Re:Already switched to Amazon by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't have much experience as a seller. The main thing I'd be worried about is that for popular books it is quite a good place for buyers to get a good deal - which means the price you'll get as a seller is not likely to be great. But if you're willing to settle for the lowest price, it should be a reasonable way of selling them.

  29. I think all my Check/MO customers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Will suddenly be "pay when you pick up" customers. Payment can be pre-sent via USPS mail, and shipping will be concierge service automatically 24 hours after payment if they can't pick it up because they suddenly got too busy. :)

    1. Re:I think all my Check/MO customers... by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was thinking. They can't really police all the auctions to look for "cash at pickup" and "free delivery service with prepayment", now can they?

  30. So long USPO Money Order, the best option to pay by Xanthvar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now you can truly get scammed!

    Previously, the best way to pay was with a US Post Office money order.

    What you would do is write a description of the item that you had purchased, and if you didn't get it, the seller had committed mail fraud.

    The reason this was the best, is that they (the post office)have a whole division dedicated to mail fraud, and would actually work at tracking down fraudsters and shutting down their operations, as the laws on mail fraud have teeth, as opposed to something that belongs in small claims court otherwise.

    Other payment methods (Visa, MC, PayPal) isn't going to spend a whole lot of effort to recover minor amounts of money, they may refund your money, but the scammer gets to continue their operation, maybe with a minor name change, taking advantage of the next sucker to come along.

    This goes back to the reason why you don't really want to hack government entities, is that they will spend a fortune on tracking down the perpetrator all out of disproportion to the actual damage caused. *

    In fact, a good way to tell the legitimacy of the seller, especially if they were a "private" seller, is to see if they would accept a USPO money order.

    If they didn't it was a red flag that you may not want to deal with them.

    I can understand (from a purely greed standpoint) of EBay not wanting to allow this type of transaction, as they don't get even more of a cut of the PayPal action, and just have to make due with the listing fee.

    Oh well, just another nail in the coffin for fiscal responsibility.

  31. All about the intention by jeevesbond · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, of course the excuse they are using is factually correct. We have to look deeper, at what they're really intending to achieve by doing this. It doesn't take a tinfoil hat wearing loon to see that eBay are trying to shoe-horn everyone into paying by Paypal. They've already tried it once recently!

    There's also one point the summary missed:

    eBay ran into trouble earlier this year for trying to restrict payment options.

    The thing is, they ran into trouble in Australia. Will the US DOJ take an interest? Am guessing, but I doubt it.

    This is a case where the course of action for the DOJ is clear however. eBay and Paypal should be split into two separate companies, that would stop this -- and any future -- nefarious deals between the two. Returning competition to the market.

    --
    I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    1. Re:All about the intention by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Nah the DOJ wont care.

      I *really* like our ACCC.
      They really keep companies in line.

    2. Re:All about the intention by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      In the United States, there's nothing preventing eBay users from filing an antitrust civil suit. The government doesn't have to do anything. In fact, quite frankly, I think it would be a great idea for... say ten thousand eBay sellers who have gotten screwed by PayPal to file a class action. Knock their greedy scheme down a couple pegs. Oh, and be sure to do it in the 9th Circuit (e.g. California) where eBay's binding arbitration clause isn't worth the paper they didn't print it on.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:All about the intention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! and split google adwords from search!

      for bonus points, let's do a triple split of Bed, Bath and Beyond!

    4. Re:All about the intention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hummmmmmmmmmmm I have to be a "Anonymous Coward" to make this post? ~~~ LOL
      Paypal by at least one of their actions are in violation of US Restraint of trade laws and should be prosecuted by the Department Of Justice.
        When I started using PayPal I was given a $5000 Credit limit covered by a debit card. As we all know this means almost instantaneous withdrawal from the payees account (mine) and credit to the collecting service (paypal) and providing the seller with notice that the funds are available. ~~~
      Possibly the least risky transfer possible, even safer than cash.
        In exchange for acting as a "factor" ( the seller doesn't have the ability to process cards himself) Paypal takes a percentage, charging the merchant for their middleman position, acting as "collector".
        Most of us view a "Credit Limit" as just that ... a limit on the amount we might use per transaction, until the transaction is completed. Generally this limit rises with use based on the history of your use.
        Not with PayPal ...... they put a whole new spin on it .... it decreases with every purchase.
      AND when you reach your limit they will no longer accept payment from your debit card UNLESS you provide them with access to your banking information and allow them access to your account.
        That's right ~~~ They restrain the Ebay Sellers from doing bossiness with those that spend the most on ebay!
        They are no longer a honest broker of the collection of funds, but are using the position they have gained from the vertical integration of the financial portion of the company,(PayPal) to force you to comply with their demands if you want to do business on ebay !
          Imagine ``` What other business could do this?
      Would you continue to buy from any institution, under those terms?
        suppose your department store or boutique, any other institution you deal with wouldn't accept your debit card for your purchases, UNLESS you complied with their demands to have access to your banking information?
        PayPal by these and other acts are in violation of the antitrust laws of the United States and should be brought to the Courts for prosecution .

      A Anoymous Coward ...

    5. Re:All about the intention by dword · · Score: 1

      eBay and Paypal should be split into two separate companies, that would stop this

      Then, I guess we should put Microsoft in a blender.

    6. Re:All about the intention by rfunches · · Score: 1

      Could you explain how eBay is trying to kill off the other payment processors, then? If you claim eBay is a monopoly, I can't begin to imagine what you think of Microsoft.

    7. Re:All about the intention by dkone · · Score: 1

      How many similar posts do we need to see? The market is not Ebay/Paypal. Are we looking for competing online auctions with single source payment options?

      The market is online auctions period. Stop lumping them together. If you don't like one for any reason, don't use it.

      DK

    8. Re:All about the intention by db32 · · Score: 1

      Or they should break that "but we have a patent...for all auctions...ONLINE". Let other auction sites spring up and then this one will fix itself or go under. I would much rather have them break a stupid patent that is restricting business and allowing this one company to act in monopolistic ways.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    9. Re:All about the intention by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      First, PayPal is not a general-purpose payment processor. It is a personal online payment processor for people without merchant accounts. By essentially eliminating the ability to use any other personal payment processors, that's prima facie monopoly abuse, and since eBay is the most common place for people to use those personal payment processors, that has a serious impact on those alternate processors.

      Second, yes, eBay is pretty clearly a monopoly. There are one or two other online auction sites out there, but last I tried them, they all either suffer from usability problems, a lack of availability of interesting stuff, or both. The size of eBay has basically rendered them unable to usefully compete.

      Forcing people to use one service in order to use another service is almost certainly illegal tying....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  32. Turn Away Customers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being in electronic payments business, though overall check volume is declining nationwide, I can't understand why any merchant (in this case Ebay) would turn down business by not accepting checks as a form of payment.

    As much as we would like to see them go away, they won't for a long time. Banks still continue to issued personal check, even for folks that can't qualify for credit cards.

    I don't think this program will last too long... other services will guarantee checks (like a credit card).

    I think other hungry competitors would gladly accept these forms of payment to attract new customers..

    1. Re:Turn Away Customers... by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      I can't understand why any merchant (in this case Ebay) would turn down business by not accepting checks as a form of payment.

      Because they make more money when people pay via PayPal, which they own.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  33. Stupid decision by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 0

    This is ridiculous. When I sell on eBay, the ONLY method I accept is U.S. postal money orders. Not even checks. Just money orders. And when I buy, I only buy from sellers who accept money orders. They're the only payment method that can be trusted at all. Forget this electronic trash. I'm going to stop using eBay unless they reverse this stupid decision.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  34. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by iocat · · Score: 1

    It depends on what you want. If you want something new or modern, forget eBay. If you want something old or obscure (Apple IIc flat-panel display, copy of Suspended in the box), it's still the only game in town.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  35. How does this solve anything? by statemachine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    EBay/PayPal holding the money doesn't solve where the buyer gets the item but claims he didn't, or where the seller ships something else.

    It's still he said, she said. People on both sides will still get ripped off. The only thing different is the extra fees by using PayPal.

    1. Re:How does this solve anything? by Sparky9292 · · Score: 1

      EBay/PayPal holding the money doesn't solve where the buyer gets the item but claims he didn't, or where the seller ships something else.It's still he said, she said. People on both sides will still get ripped off. The only thing different is the extra fees by using PayPal.

      As a seller, you do get $2000 of protection if you only accept Paypal and you only ship via UPS tracking using what's called a confirmed Paypal address. Basically you have to prove that you are at that address via a major credit card, or by snail mail.

      My only gripe with the confirmed address policy is that eBay doesn't verify that bidders have one before they bid on an item. So when a bidder wins an auction, they often bitch to me that Paypal is refusing payment until they get it "fixed". And of course no one actually reads the item description that warns that my auctions require this.

    2. Re:How does this solve anything? by statemachine · · Score: 1

      As a seller, you do get $2000 of protection if you only accept Paypal and you only ship via UPS tracking using what's called a confirmed Paypal address. Basically you have to prove that you are at that address via a major credit card, or by snail mail.

      So what?

      Unless your box is transparent, or the UPS driver sticks around as a witness, the buyer can just claim that you shipped him something else. How do you prove that you didn't? Unless again, UPS watches you pack the box and acts as a witness for what went into the box. Even then, the item may look the same but not be exactly what was ordered.

      And is the $2000 protection unconditional? I doubt that PayPal will just take your word every single time.

      I'm not saying you personally have done anything wrong.

    3. Re:How does this solve anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is untrue. I have used Paypal since it's inception and I've had people try to scam me on both sides of the ball. I've never lost. The key to beating a buyer claiming he didn't get the item is to provide tracking information on the package and proper disclaimers in the auction. If you can prove the item showed up at the their doorstep, Paypal will support your side. They have more for me more times than I can count.

  36. I would be boycotting EBAY except that ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... I already started boycotting EBAY when they bought PayPal.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  37. you dont -have- to infinitely grow revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    unles you are a caancer.... or a publicly traded corporation ....

    eby could be a fine, stable business... if they go private and quit worrying about how to do 'double digit growth'... a ridiculous long term goal for any company.

  38. They failed in Australia, and yet they try again? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    So, they tried this crap as a trial run in Australia, telling everyone it was going to become the policy... except, well, enough people saw it for what it was, which is purely trying to make even more money... and got the ACCC (Australian Competition & Consumer Commission) to rule it not allowed.

    Huzzah for Australia, but man... eBay can't be going too well if they're going to keep trying this crap.

    They're going to discover people aren't quite as loyal as they may have thought.

  39. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Tacvek · · Score: 1

    The more restrictions they put on their service, the less interest I have in using it.

    I liked the good old days of ebay where you could buy a few sparc stations and then drive over to a guys house and give him cash for them.

    That is still allowed under the current policy, as there are no restrictions on the payment at pick-up option, but very few sellers offer that.

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  40. As a sometime seller by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    As a sometime seller,this isn't significant.

    In about 1,200 sales, I've had exactly one bad check, and that was about six years ago.

    I've had 99+ buyers paying by PayPal for the last four years or so, with no push from me.

    So this change is not going to change things for most buyers or sellers. It does simplifiy things a bit.

    1. Re:As a sometime seller by Skapare · · Score: 1

      The buyers you get are the ones that don't mind what EBAY is doing. But you are getting fewer buyers (e.g. fewer bids) than you might have, otherwise. I can assure you I have not bid on any of your items because I don't use EBAY anymore. As this drives away even more people from EBAY, you'll be getting fewer bids and selling at a lower price in many cases.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  41. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used ebay for the last time a couple of weeks ago. Tried to use a credit card via PayPal and found that I couldn't without giving very personal information --- so I sent a bank check and decided then that I wouldn't be back.

    Pity. Greed has no bounds, it seems.

  42. the first 50 or so items on my feedback list by screamphilling · · Score: 1

    I started ebaying at about the age of 14. the first 50 or so items that I purchased were done via postal money order. Prepaid credit cards are easily obtainable these days but they weren't back then. I'd get my dad to let me use his credit card sometimes, but it was alot easier to buy a money order.

    I'm sure it wasn't too much revenue for ebay, but there are plenty of other 15 year olds out there and banking impaired people.... unless ebay is purposely trying to remove this demographic from their business as some sort of precaution or something.

  43. Corrections by mpapet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Paypal acts like a payment processor, not a bank. They don't have a bank charter among other things. Payment processing regulation is very lax.

    They are a teeeny-tiny player in the payment processing world dominated by hook-and-crook by the Visa association of banks.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Corrections by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

      Paypal acts like a payment processor, not a bank. They don't have a bank charter among other things. Payment processing regulation is very lax.

      They allow you to move money from your bank account to your paypal account.

      They allow you to elect to make payments from your paypal "balance"

      They offer a "debit card" that draws from your paypal "balance".

      If someone sends you funds, it goes towards this balance.

      If they put a hold on your account, they deny you access to this "balance" that is your money.

      They sure sound a lot like a bank to me.

      I suggest calling your legislators, writing them, etc, to ask for tougher regulation and better regulatory oversight for the operations of companies like PayPal.

    2. Re:Corrections by pappy97 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You forgot the part about how paypal has it such that your paypal balance can be a money market account which earns interest. When you consider that plus everything else, it's definitely acting like a bank.

    3. Re:Corrections by mysidia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's more like a sweep account you might have with a brokerage firm. The reason is... the money market account PayPal offers is not an insured account.

      Moreover, (accordingly) shares you purchase are entered in your name with you as "Owner of record" for the shares. I.E. The moneymarket investment is your investment, not PayPal's, and you take on the risk of loss of value.

      So the fund manager "Barclays Global Investors" is paying out the interest.

      It seems to me like PayPal is acting a lot like an introducing broker.

      Broker/Dealers are subject to a lot of regulatory scrutiny, much like banks are. I wonder how it is possible that PayPal is in the business of marketing securities to the public in this manner without being a broker...

    4. Re:Corrections by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suggest, instead of calling your legislators to ask them for more laws and restrictions, I suggest that you use your freedom of choice, and stop doing business with PayPal.

      Because the next time you ask a legislator to regulate something you don't like, they may end up regulating something you DO like.

      The heavy hand of government should be the absolute last resort.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The main responsibility of a bank is the production of money through fractional reserve banking, and they are so well regulated because of that. Payment processing accounts for a very small amount of the income of the banks. The government only cares about regulating the total amount of USD, not the shuttling around of funds between folks.

    6. Re:Corrections by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Refraining from doing business with PayPal is not an option. There is in many cases no good alternative.

      PayPal also doesn't care if I personally or even if I get 1000 people to join me in refraining from using them; it won't change a thing. There won't be a massive boycott of PayPal; only a small number of people have been directly impacted by PayPal's bad practices, not enough to create the necessary outrage.

      People have tried personally boycotting PayPal for a long time -- this isn't a good answer either, these people are personally harmed by not having use of PayPal's services.

      And PayPal doesn't care. The only thing corporations as huge as PayPal do understand is regulation.

      The regulations don't need to tell PayPal how to blow their nose, but they need to tell them not to blow it in my face.

      They need to be restrained from arbitrarily freezing individual customers accounts and holding cash that rightfully belongs to the customers for extended periods of time.

      Amounts frozen for more than X days need be limited to transactions that there is specific and reported cause for suspicion about.

      Amounts frozen for more than Y days need to be limited to transactions that have an issue. And X

      They should be prohibited from discriminating: no closing of an account without cause and without warning. And no stealing: no closing an account and refusing to release assets for 6 months, without a judge's order to do so.

    7. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early this year, PayPal tried to bluff me into giving them my bank account number because I had spent $2000 on my account with them (using my bank issued VISA card). I told them to take a hike, closed out my PayPay account, and have stopped using eBay as a place to purchase items. I think I am making it just fine without them. Vote with your feet, people!

    8. Re:Corrections by vought · · Score: 1

      I suggest calling your legislators, writing them, etc, to ask for tougher regulation and better regulatory oversight for the operations of companies like PayPal.

      Meg's got half of them in her pocket by party affiliation, and the other half is a little busy anyway.

      Fucking "Whitman Campus"...is that the height of arrogance, or what?

    9. Re:Corrections by vought · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suggest, instead of calling your legislators to ask them for more laws and restrictions, I suggest that you use your freedom of choice, and stop doing business with PayPal.

      I think the point of this article is that eBay is rapidly removing payment options in order to force people to use their unregulated banking service.

      If you'll recall, un- or under-regulated banking practices led to the current mess.

      I think a little scrutiny is warranted. And if warranted upon scrutiny, action. Us little guys don't get much of a voice anymore if government doesn't do the shouting.

    10. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Europe, eBay _HAS_ bank status. Based in Luxembourg IIRC.

    11. Re:Corrections by rapiddescent · · Score: 3, Informative

      Paypal acts like a payment processor, not a bank. They don't have a bank charter among other things. ...

      Yes they do, the UK FSA forced them to become a money issuer in 2004 and to escape FSA ruling in 2007 they managed to get a banking license issued by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) in Luxembourg - under the name eBay SA. The European Paypal HQ is therefore now in Luxemburg.

      The problem with this is that Luxemburg has well known lax regulations for banking and is a well known tax haven - that has seriously pissed off the German government for harbouring criminals and tax evaders. Also, they have strict banking secrecy laws so that Paypal can operate autonomously reporting to no-one.

    12. Re:Corrections by dkone · · Score: 1

      Your point is well made, but I think the real answer is to not do business with Ebay. Ebay is the one basically forcing you to use Paypal. While I agree there are not a lot of payment options in this space, I believe that your options lie in multiple places to sell you goods.

      DK

    13. Re:Corrections by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

      I think I might develop a liking for throwing stones at the roof of your house, Unpossible. But you better not ask for me to be regulated, because next time, they might end up banning you from leaving your house during daylight hours or something.

      You're forgetting that the concepts of "discretion" and "judgement" can be (and always should be) applied to regulation. But I guess if you understood or believed in those, you couldn't be a libertarian.

    14. Re:Corrections by wisty · · Score: 1

      This is a very good reason for *not* regulating PayPal as a bank or broker. PayPal competitors couldn't afford the red tape.

    15. Re:Corrections by mysidia · · Score: 1

      As mentioned; it's not necessary to create red tape, only to make them refrain from doing things they should not be doing anyways.

      They don't need to have all the red tape banks have, but there should be a few rules, so we the citizens can have some protection and piece of mind regarding $$$ we place into the temporary care of a company like PayPal.

      Regardless of what they do, the rules should be extended to offshore organizations, or stiff penalties (like 'firewalling' money traffic from the US to PayPal at points where $$$ changes hands with the customer) should be created for any org trying to evade the rules by moving offshore or moving US business to an offshore branch.

    16. Re:Corrections by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      lets not forget:

      reports to the IRS
      offers money market accounts
      all non-money market accounts are FDIC insured for 1,000,000

      it isn't just acting like a bank, it is a bank, and it doesn't deny that.

      They don't need tougher regulation, the problems people have are *because of* the tough regulation- there are so many checks in place to try and stop money laundering, fraud etc
      for example, if you've logged in from more than two computers in the past 24 hours (or as a result of the implementation, browsers..), if you and the person you are sending money to have logged in from the same ip address, if you are sending money to/from certain countries from outside of that country

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    17. Re:Corrections by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I refuse to use Ebay anymore - they refuse to adjust their auction practices to eliminate the bid snipers. Any auction house who ran their shop the way ebay does would go bankrupt in a hurry. And it's giving preferential search results to it's ebay stores members? ugh.

      Ebay stopped being a good place to find a good deal a long time ago unless you're looking for something weird and nowhere near mainstream. lol.

    18. Re:Corrections by PawNtheSandman · · Score: 0

      Sniping isn't a problem. The problem is the 3rd party, AND the eBay approved/sold sniping programs that allow people to have their bid placed with 3 seconds left in the auction.

    19. Re:Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, you first say sniping is not a problem. Then you say that Activity X is instead the problem. Except that Activity X is the definition of sniping.

    20. Re:Corrections by TravisO · · Score: 1

      Great list but you forgot another key one:

      * They give you interest on money you leave in your account.

    21. Re:Corrections by nasor · · Score: 1

      The critical differences is are that 1) paypal does not loan out deposited money and 2) the account holder is still the owner of record for any money markets accounts (or whatever) that paypal sets up for you with your deposited money. They can't create "new money" in the form of new demand deposits. Most people don't have any real idea how money works or a bank operates, but there's a lot more to it than the general perception of "a bank is a place that stores your money for you." If that were all that banks did, there wouldn't be that much regulation necessary (certainly some, but not a lot) and we wouldn't have lawyers who specialize in banking law.

    22. Re:Corrections by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      I suggest, instead of calling your legislators to ask them for more laws and restrictions, I suggest that you use your freedom of choice, and stop doing business with PayPal. Because the next time you ask a legislator to regulate something you don't like, they may end up regulating something you DO like. The heavy hand of government should be the absolute last resort.

      Absolutely! Because if those "heavy fingers" of gubmnt get involved, it will restrict brilliant innovation in financial business that you do like! Why, take for example the securities industry, where the removal of all that restrictive gubmnt meddling allowed our Wholly Unregulated Financial Geniuses of Freedom to bring about an explosive growth of creative, innovative financial instruments such as "Credit Default Swaps" and their derivatives, leading to astronomical increase in their "value"! It worked so great in fact that now this "value" exceeds the global supply of cash, in all currencies, by a factor of about 4! And where would all that "value" be now if those gubmnt bastards had put their fat fingers of their "heavy hand" into this ...

      Oh wait...

    23. Re:Corrections by chis101 · · Score: 1

      Follow EBay's directions and enter your bid as 'the absolute maximum you are willing to pay for this item' and sniping won't affect you (your prior bid will take precedence over a sniping bid). The snipers may make you pay a little bit more at the last second, but they have the same right as you to bid what they are willing to pay.

    24. Re:Corrections by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I suggest, instead of calling your legislators to ask them for more laws and restrictions, I suggest that you use your freedom of choice, and stop doing business with PayPal.

      If that's your stance, then you must belive that all regulations should be removed. Companies should be able to dump toxic waste on elementary school grounds, and if you don't like it, don't do business with them. That's an idiotic stance that never works. PayPal *is* a bank. They are treated like such in many places they operate. They are not treated like that in the US because of people like you that would rather see people harmed than have the government have the power to help people.

    25. Re:Corrections by Shagg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sniping makes absolutely no difference if you use the bidding system correctly.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    26. Re:Corrections by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Except that my response is to stop using Ebay. I refuse to use Paypal, businesses lose my custom if they don't accept secure and reliable payment options.

      Disclaimer: I work for a real bank.

    27. Re:Corrections by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Refraining from doing business with PayPal is not an option. There is in many cases no good alternative.

      Don't use eBay. Don't use PayPal.

      If you want to use those services, use them. Don't involve the government, because there are always unintended consequences. One of which will be higher fees, guaranteed.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    28. Re:Corrections by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      If you'll recall, un- or under-regulated banking practices led to the current mess.

      No they didn't.

      What led to this mess was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac providing money that was artificially cheap. If the free market was allowed to work without government intervention (through Fannie/Freddie), then you wouldn't have had the real estate explosion, because you wouldn't have had the banks writing insane loans, because you wouldn't have had the artificially cheap money available.

      Regulations are only needed when the government interferes with the market in the first place. They create an artificial imbalance, which they then must try to counter with another artificial regulation.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    29. Re:Corrections by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Us little guys don't get much of a voice anymore if government doesn't do the shouting.

      This argument is also false. In a free market, you are able to sue to receive restitution.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    30. Re:Corrections by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      I think I might develop a liking for throwing stones at the roof of your house, Unpossible. But you better not ask for me to be regulated, because next time, they might end up banning you from leaving your house during daylight hours or something.

      I'm a Libertarian, not an anarchist. There is a police force for a reason. You're violating my basic liberties through violence. How is this analogy accurate in any way?

      You're forgetting that the concepts of "discretion" and "judgement" can be (and always should be) applied to regulation. But I guess if you understood or believed in those, you couldn't be a libertarian.

      As a Libertarian, I understand that the government is incredibly bad at discretion and judgment, and therefore I don't believe in giving them the leeway to try and apply it.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    31. Re:Corrections by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      And yet this "bank" has no branches, pays no interest and arbitrarily closes down accounts! I don't even get a free pen!

    32. Re:Corrections by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      The point is that Ebay's bidding system is completely backwards from the normal auction bidding process that has been in place for hundreds of years. Ebay's max bid process is a poor answer to the fact that they won't implement a 1 minute delay to their end-of-auction process. Even if I put in a bid for $75, and I get sniped by a bid for $75.51 with three seconds left to go in the auction.

      There's pyschology that states that yes, $75 should have been the highest I was willing to pay, but at the same time, for a newbie, it's completely ass-backwards to what they normally expect.

    33. Re:Corrections by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll work. Put them under SEC or NASD regulation...

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    34. Re:Corrections by mysidia · · Score: 1

      We're getting higher fees already -- eBay/PayPal keep raising their fees.

      An extra few dimes or so per transaction is well-worth the price, if it's necessary to provide some piece of mind, then it's a price that should be paid (Most likely, by the sellers -- and the buyers indirectly pay in terms of higher starting bids).

    35. Re:Corrections by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Even if I put in a bid for $75, and I get sniped by a bid for $75.51 with three seconds left to go in the auction.

      Then either
      (1) The "sniper" is willing to pay more than you are and deserved to win the auction, no matter when they bid.
      or
      (2) You were really willing to pay more than what you bid, and didn't use the bidding system correctly.

      The whole point of the proxy bidding system is that it makes no difference whether you bid with 2 days left or 2 seconds left. If you enter the max amount you're willing to bid, then the highest bidder wins. Which is exactly what is supposed to happen. People who don't like "snipers" just don't understand how to correctly use the proxy bidding system.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    36. Re:Corrections by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'm speaking from the point of view of the newbie. Ebay's proxy bidding is absolutely backwards to every auction format they will have ever been exposed to.

      I used to be a sniper back before proxy bidding, and when I have used Ebay since it's implementation I've used the proxy, mostly because I'm older and like to hoard my money a little more.

      Certainly didn't help my mom or sister the first half-dozen times they tried to bid on items. They're always used to the fact that they'll have a chance for a retaliatory bid.

      Proxy bidding is a crutch for ebay not wanting to implement an auction end delay, and I have no idea why. For a seller, this could be a windfall as emotional last-minute counter-bidding drives the price of my item up.

    37. Re:Corrections by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the only trade-off for excepting government intervention is a slightly higher fees. That's just the start of it.

      Name one thing not in the constitution that the government does well.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    38. Re:Corrections by Shagg · · Score: 1

      I'm speaking from the point of view of the newbie.

      So you're saying that someone new to Ebay needs to learn how it works? Isn't that common sense?

      Proxy bidding is a crutch for ebay not wanting to implement an auction end delay

      Yeah, but an auction end delay has it's own host of issues. For example, instead of a proxy max bid that would mean I have to be online and logged in to Ebay whenever any auction that I'm interested in is ending.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    39. Re:Corrections by ckaminski · · Score: 1
      I'm speaking from the point of view of the newbie.

      So you're saying that someone new to Ebay needs to learn how it works? Isn't that common sense?

      Fine I capitulate... but it's still not behavior that a new user will expect. You shouldn't need to learn how to participate in an auction... :-)

    40. Re:Corrections by mysidia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They waste taxpayer money pretty well.

      They also have nice encryption algorithms developed ala DES, AES, and fund useful research in all sorts of subjects.

      They provide useful public services such as the National Weather Service (NOAA NWS)

      I don't presume to say the regulations have to be perfect; even mediocre and lacking regulations are a little better than no regulation.

      It is a little presumptuous for me or you to say the government does a bad job at something.

      It's not easy to do what the government does -- balance the needs of stakeholders and make the rules that ensure the best interests of the public they represent.

  44. Alternatives to eBay? by sdhoigt · · Score: 2

    Can anyone recommend any other online auction houses (I.e., one that you've actually used it to but/sell an item)?

    Thanks,
    SD

  45. Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's been decades since we've had a true competitive market in the US. Agriculture was the last to go.

  46. Paypal fees are a joke by kamikaze2112 · · Score: 0

    They aren't trying to make it safer for anyone, they are trying to line their pockets with even more money. The sad truth is that eBay makes it a pain to pay any other way. It wouldn't be so bad if their fees were more in line with what a B&M store has for say, a debit/cc terminal. The last time I received money from an eBay transaction I got dinged for 2 or 3 bucks, which is on top of the auction fees. All said and done, I was out close to $6 in fees, which isn't a lot of money I suppose, but it's quite a lot when you look at credit card and debit transactions from a real terminal. Considering the sheer number of transactions they must make, I'm sure they get better pricing on the transactions themselves than the mom and pop dollar store in the plaza across the street, and yet I doubt it costs them $6 to sell ~$100 worth of merchandise in a single transaction.

  47. Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish you Americans would learn to use the word "Cheque". Yes, I know any word with a "q" in it must frighten the bejaysus out of you, but "check" already exists as a different word with a completely different purpose, one it serves well. And while you're at it, it's a QUEUE, not a "Q".

    1. Re:Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a "check" because it is use to literally check whether or not an exchange of funds is authorized. "Cheque" is a British bastardization of English. I know, you're not used to that, but given time I think you'll get over it. I just hope the Germans et al don't get around to correcting you about how you have mismanaged their languages!

    2. Re:Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the word is spelled Check here.

    3. Re:Check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that's bad, try "die":
      - Die (manufacturing), material-shaping device
      - Die (integrated circuit), rectangular fragment of a semiconductor wafer
      - Die, cube or other polyhedron for making random choices, usually as one of two or more dice
      - Tap and die, cutting tools used to create screw threads in solid substances.
      - Die, to undergo death

      I wish you english-speaking types would learn to invent new words. Yes, I know new words frighten the bejaysus out of you, but if a word already exists with a single purpose, leave it alone.

      And while you're at it, Q said to buzz off, you insignificant lifeform.

    4. Re:Check? by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      And it's a "flat tire" not a "puncture" or a "tyre".

      Go pay your TV tax so you can watch Torchwood again.

  48. The tipping point? by steveha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Right now, eBay is the auction place. Sellers want to sell on eBay because that's where all the buyers are. Buyers want to buy on eBay because that's where all the sellers are.

    At some point, both buyers and sellers could get sufficiently upset with eBay as to take their business elsewhere. Are we there yet?

    And if we are, what is the most likely competitor?

    http://online-auction-sites.toptenreviews.com/

    One more thought: if the current situation is close to the tipping point, then all it would take is one single disturbance to cause a mass exodus from eBay to the new site. For example, if Google were to buy one of eBay's top competitors, and publicly announce Google Auctions, and announce that they would charge less in fees and allow checks and postal money orders... eBay could lose everything in the blink of an eye.

    Remember how fast Xfree86 was dumped in favor of X.org? Dissatisfaction with the Xfree86 project was already high, and then they announced one more petty annoying license change, and *boom*, they were done. I wonder if this could happen with eBay.

    http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3338031

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:The tipping point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point, both buyers and sellers could get sufficiently upset with eBay as to take their business elsewhere. Are we there yet?

      For example, if Google were to buy one of eBay's top competitors, and publicly announce Google Auctions, and announce that they would charge less in fees and allow checks and postal money orders... eBay could lose everything in the blink of an eye.

      I believe this IS the tipping point. I have been an ebay seller and buyer since 1997 and am done. They are not getting another cent from me. I would go to a Google Auction in a second, however, there IS another competitor looming that may also be able to pull it off. GoAntiques was bought by something called Worthpoint and word is they are planning on starting their own auction site. I think enough people are familiar with GoAntiques and are sick enough of ebay that they may just be able to pull it off. I hope so...but boy, Google Auctions would be cool!

    2. Re:The tipping point? by torkus · · Score: 1

      Well i'm not sure how big x.org is compared to ebay/pp but...you're right. The online consumer is VERY fickle. It woudln't take much for a mass exodus to another site. Craigslist is...well...a bit flooded with spam in the bigger cities but they're working on that.

      Someone else will come out of nowhere with a better buesiness model and ebay will be a wiki page in history.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    3. Re:The tipping point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.ioffer.com

      Not just an auction site, but a pretty transparent selling site. And they have over five million listings. They also allow for Google Checkout, MOs, etc.

  49. protection by falconwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Besides if your dealing on the net the protection of a CC is a must

    CCs only protect buyers not sellers. A buyer can always dispute a charge on their credit card, which is a good thing as credit cards or their numbers can be stolen. But it's bad for sellers, they may not get paid. And if they have too many chargebacks their merchant account can be canceled. As for paying with checks or money orders, banks will stop payments on checks and the buyer can get a refund with their money order receipt.

    Falcon

    1. Re:protection by mrbcs · · Score: 0
      Credit card companies will NOT reimburse payments made through Paypal as that is a 3rd party. They tell you to take it up with Paypal. Been there, got ripped off for $300. once... only once.

      I agree, paypal should be regulated like a bank.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    2. Re:protection by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Credit card companies will NOT reimburse payments made through Paypal as that is a 3rd party.

      I wouldn't expect a credit card company to do anything with PayPal, unless PayPal incorrectly charges the card.

      I agree, paypal should be regulated like a bank.

      PayPal is not a bank and shouldn't be treated like one. And we don't need more regulations, we need less.

      Falcon

    3. Re:protection by tm2b · · Score: 1

      we don't need more regulations, we need less.

      ...and $700 Billion.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    4. Re:protection by nasor · · Score: 1

      You are correct, and a key difference between CC companies and paypal is that for CC companies that customers are the cardholders. Sure, the CC companies also manage to skim a nice amount of profit from merchant fees, but the majority of their profits come from interest that their card users pay. Their incentive is to do everything they can to protect the card users so that they can attract more customers. In disputed between merchants and card holder, the CC policies are VERY lopsided toward the card holder. A dishonest customer can usually simply say "they lied about the product" or something similar are get out of paying. With ebay, on the other hand, the true customers - the people who give them their profit - are the sellers who pay auction fees. ebay buyers don't actually give ebay any money. Of course there wouldn't be any seller fees without buyers, but since on ebay the sellers are the true customers ebay does whatever it can to protect the seller. In disputes the policies are lopsided toward the seller; a seller can simply ship an empty box, and paypal will accept that as "proof" that the merchant delivered the advertised product.

  50. How is this even legal? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    How can a business stipulate that you cant use accepted legal forms of payment?

    They get the fee from the listing, AND the pay-pal service fee. Double dipping and restrictive business practices from a virtual monopoly.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:How is this even legal? by v1 · · Score: 1

      just what I was thinking... if they're going to do that then they should waive the paypal fee on payments for ebay items.

      Don't want the paypal fee? oh then just, oh wait that's right, you CAN'T do that now can you? Tough luck there bud. Pay up.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:How is this even legal? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Not merely a virtual monopoly; a true monpoly.

      And they are participating in anticompetitive practices. (Banning users of the site from conducting business using a competing payment product instead of the "PayPal" product they now wish to bundle as required for use with the service.)

      The DOJ _ought_ to be busting eBay's ass about right now.

    3. Re:How is this even legal? by marxmarv · · Score: 1

      How can a business stipulate that you cant use accepted legal forms of payment?

      I remember reading recently that it was settled law for a business to not accept cash as payment. Don't remember where I heard that, or I'd refer you to it.

      They get the fee from the listing, AND the pay-pal service fee. Double dipping and restrictive business practices from a virtual monopoly.

      Yeah, the FTC probably won't like that.

      --
      /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
    4. Re:How is this even legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for ebay's "just a venue" stance...how they even got away with saying that in th

  51. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Don't hold your breath, they cant make enough money off the private 'yard sale' customers to make them happy.

    I see craigslist growing due to this blunder.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  52. That's a good policy in general... by Rix · · Score: 1

    But not in this case. As a seller, you can't go elsewhere because all the buyers are there, and as a buyer you can't go elsewhere because all the sellers are there.

    Ebay holds a fully locked down monopoly, and they need to be regulated as such.

    1. Re:That's a good policy in general... by v1 · · Score: 1

      there are other places to buy and sell online. ebay isn't the only one. Several other alternatives are mentioned in this thread.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:That's a good policy in general... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Ebay holds a fully locked down monopoly, and they need to be regulated as such.

      eBay is not a monopoly. There are plenty of online auctions, even Amazon has auctions.

      Falcon

    3. Re:That's a good policy in general... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus but you're a busy bee in this thread. Care to disclose the motivations of your interest?

    4. Re:That's a good policy in general... by jsight · · Score: 1

      eBay is not a monopoly. There are plenty of online auctions, even Amazon has auctions.

      This is the first time in quite a few years that I've heard someone mention the (defunct) Amazon Auctions service as if it were active.

  53. There really are a lot of check scams by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    To be fair, there are a ton of scams involving money orders and checks.

    It's not just some buyer getting scammed by sending a money order and never receiving merchandise. It's also sellers getting scammed by accepting fake money orders and are then liable for cashing it. Often, they even pay the scammer, because the money order is too large of an amount and the gullible seller refunds the difference.

  54. Well, ebay just lost me as a customer by G00F · · Score: 1

    I would only buy using checks or direct credit card and stayed the hell away from paypal after they froze a close friends account that had 10k for some BS reasons about someone buying from him might have committed fraud, yea so 6 months later he finally got it back, but had to get another job and nearly lost his house.

    And ebay and pay pall have no need to know of my bank accounts yet it is now a requirement.(stopped selling when they demanded it back in 99/2000 I think)

    Ebay is taken over by big businesses so it is much harder to find used older stuff at expected prices.

    Thats alright, I recently looked at ebay for something for ~$250-$400 range then found a local one for $100 on craigslist.

    So long ebay!

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  55. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Australians the next best "somewhere else" is "Oztion.com.au". You can still use Paypal if you want but they don't push it more than any other option - probably because they don't own it...

  56. I will not use Paypal, so I no longer use Ebay by syousef · · Score: 1

    They tried this shite out in Australia first, and had the Australian consumer watchdog and the Reserve Bank weigh in with an opinion.

    In the end the only time I've ever needed Paypal, it offered exactly what the fine print suggested, but this was of no use to me. I was a buyer had received a damaged repackaged low value item (about $30). The item was shipped within Australia but I was forced to send correspondence to the US and was directed to send an international fax and make international phone calls during overseas business hours. I was also told the matter would not be pursued unless I was able to fax a statement by an expert on a company letter head outlining why the goods were not as described. This is before they'd even persue the matter. Tell me where I can get an official unbiased evaluation and report on an item for under $30. Not their problem they said. Fine. I had bought by credit card so I issued a chargeback, closed my Paypal account and informed my bank that further charges from Paypal were not to be processed.

    Now they may have honoured the terms of the fine print, but they also claim to cover low value goods, so as far as I'm concerned they offered me something which in practical terms was of no use to me. It's like insuring a car for $5000 where the excess is $6000. I'd be a fool to accept that deal even if they honoured the letter of the law. Bottom line: If I can't feel secure with Paypal for small payments, I sure as hell won't trust them with large sums of money.

    I've made one Ebay purchase in the last 3-4 years. It was C.O.D.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  57. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

    I must be ignorant,

    How is placing an ad in the paper providing any more protection then an ad placed on craigslist?

    --
    Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  58. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eBay is done. eBay and Paypal both suck dick.

    Buy/sell your stuff on Amazon instead.

  59. Never again by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    The one time I ever paid for anything on Ebay with a check, was late in 2007 for an item I really wanted for a holiday gift. This is after a few hundred Ebay transactions, never had a problem before. This seller basically just cashed my check and that was that. Vanished. Ebay support and abuse departments would never even discuss it with me. And that was that, as far as me and Ebay are concerned.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  60. add it to the list by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    yet another reason why ebay continues to suck more and more.. i don't understand why i get emails from the CEO of ebay saying, "you've complained, and we've listened!" when absolutely NOTHING has been done to benefit the people that make ebay money.. THE SELLERS! TAKE YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES!! I actually used to work for an ebay powerseller, and we sold loads of stuff! after time the business went under due to many contributing factors.. higher listing fees and FVF's, paypal transaction fees, the *requirement* to use Blackthorne as opposed to Seller's Assistant Pro, and their newest additions to their feedback rating systems.. ebay, you need to understand one thing.. once you screw the sellers, you're going to screw the buyers too.. the fees don't seem like much until you're selling thousands and thousands of dollars worth of stuff a week.. then you realize, ok, ebay sucks..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  61. It was better when it was a flea market by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Ebay has been going downhill since it decided it was more interested in being a big box store than a place where people could buy and sell their wares. I had an ebay business for a couple years closed with the first big fee increase a few years back, the last person I knew that was still a seller gave up and packed it in a few months back. Unfortunately with ebay's 25% stake in Craigslist if ebay went completely under it would likely do its best to ensure that it took CL with it.

    1. Re:It was better when it was a flea market by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Someone will just create a new CL model.

      eBay are mostly hanging on because of network effects. It wouldn't be surprised if some big company has an auction site primed and ready to go, waiting for an opportune moment when eBay oversteps the mark.

      When eBay started, the fees may have been reasonable, but the costs of hosting a large web site are much lower than they were 10 years ago. The fees should be a fraction of what they are now.

  62. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by ppanon · · Score: 1

    "I will randomly pack a few valueable items into one of 500 lots of near worthless items" buy a lot of lots and hope you get lucky!

    Dang! That's the solution to the credit crisis! Sell all those mortgage bonds on eBay where there's already a lot of suckers^H^H^H^H^H^H^Heager customers for that type of product.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  63. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by AdamTrace · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every time I do that, I end up spending the next hour ranting to my wife (seriously, for real, I have one of those)...

    Not for long, if you keep that up...! :)

  64. Re:So long USPO Money Order, the best option to pa by rtechie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Previously, the best way to pay was with a US Post Office money order.

    Money orders are basically cash. This is a TERRIBLE idea.

    What you would do is write a description of the item that you had purchased, and if you didn't get it, the seller had committed mail fraud.

    The USPS doesn't prosecute individuals for mail fraud on eBay. And even if they did, the worst offenders are overseas and out of the reach of the USPS.

    Other payment methods (Visa, MC, PayPal) isn't going to spend a whole lot of effort to recover minor amounts of money, they may refund your money,

    The credit card companies will almost certainly refund your money because they MAKE MONEY on refunds. Ebay sellers are often charged $250 for each chargeback. American Express almost always takes the side of the consumer, they expect every merchant using AMEX to have a 30-day "no questions asked" return policy.

    This goes back to the reason why you don't really want to hack government entities, is that they will spend a fortune on tracking down the perpetrator all out of disproportion to the actual damage caused.

    No they won't. Most attacks against the Pentagon, NSA, and the White House aren't even investigated.

    Think about this logically for a second: How many IP scanners are out there (lots) and how much IP space does the federal government have (lots and lots)? So logically if you run a port scanner on "the internet" (as many attackers do) you're going to hit a lot of federal IPs. Do you seriously think the feds investigate every one of those (several hundered per day) IP scans?

  65. This will hurt US international sellers and Ebay by mckinnsb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work at a high-end guitar store in the Northeast, and my boss put his entire store inventory (that he owned) on Ebay. The reason was simple enough: his inventory was pretty unique, expensive, and collectable, so he felt he needed to reach a global audience to have the best potential to move his gear.

    He stopped accepting PayPal for international bidders after an incident in which a international scam artist purchased an item online and reversed the purchase the day it was shipped out the door. Unfortunately, PayPal offers no insurance to the seller in international transactions. So PayPal is a no go for him.

    Credit cards are also a problem. He has been burned before. While credit companies and credit card processing companies generally protect you more than PayPal, it can still complicate international small-scale business. In order to verify that the person is not using a stolen credit card, he has to call up the credit agency in its respective country and verify that the shipping address and billing address are the same. Interestingly enough, some banks (particularly in the UK) will flat out refuse to give you this information - even a simple yes or no response when you give them the address you have is against their policy. Also interestingly enough, this service is not automated for international transactions , although it is for US transactions. Now imagine doing this many, many times a day, especially if you sell cheaper items, lets say in the 10-20 dollar range. Also keep in mind that the more times you give a customer an indication of distrust (such as calling them at their residence to confirm other information or ask the bank to release information), the greater your chance to drop the sale becomes.

    I'd estimate that roughly 80% of his international transactions over eBay were done via check, money order, or direct money wire, because these methods of payment were convenient while also fairly risk-and-hassle-free. Without this option, I don't see him making as many sales overall, especially in today's market, where the US economy is floundering and the majority of his sales come from overseas. Nearly 3 out of every 5 guitars we shipped last year went overseas, despite high shipping rates, and many of them went to England. Nearly 4 out of 5 of every 1000+ plus item went overseas.

    Now, of course, many of you are probably saying "Well now, why didn't he just start a website?". He did. The problem is this: eBay just has too much exposure to let go of. He will probably keep his eBay store, but mostly because advertising through Google or anywhere else is just so damn expensive. He used to pour 500 dollars a month into AdWords. Guess where that got him? Nowhere. Analytics even said so. But when the customers contact him through Ebay, ethically he has to complete the sale through Ebay (or lose his merchant account). If he is restrained to completing the sales through Ebay, he will probably make less sales because for him credit card is now the only option (pay on pickup doesn't really make sense internationally), and his business and Ebay will both suffer. But if he behaves unethically by taking those contacts and processes them through his own website , Ebay still loses and there is the potential of him losing his account and exposure, along with the additional "untrusty" flag that comes along with telling a customer you are going to "bend the rules".

    I don't see how this can be a win for Ebay.

  66. Pretty simple what it's about by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

    Money.

    Dumb question time -- I'm assuming we all know that eBay owns PayPal?

  67. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Auctions. Or Google Auctions Beta.

    They have the visibility, reputation, and deep pockets to survive a monopolistic battle with e-Bay, and it would give them
    a) a portal for ad space
    b) a key venue for an entry into the financial transactions sector

    Microsoft is looking for a) and was trying to get into b) a few years back with their whole MS wallet deal. Back then it wasn't the time or the place (and their initial implementations had sucky security, surprise, surprise). But as eBay/Paypal try to rake more from their current users and alienate them, it opens doors that were closed.

    Google Auctions and Google [Micropayments|Bank] would probably give Steve B. a heart attack.

    I would like to also say "Apple Auctions", optionally bundled with iTunes music store, but that's unlikely since it doesn't fit with Apple's corporate image of providing premium value through design and quality.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  68. Ebay is no longer a marketplace by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    It's not a virtual marketplace anymore. They tell you what you can and can't sell, they tell you how you can sell it and how you can collect payment. And on top of that they charge you more and more. Hardly sounds like a marketplace to me.

    1. Re:Ebay is no longer a marketplace by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 1

      I wonder how ebay plans to defend/justify their "just a venue" stance now.

  69. Anglosphere vs. Amerisphere by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

    Assuming London (+44 171) 'Marblemouth' accent.

    I have a sack of marbles from which I will proceed to fill my mouth in order to speak properly...(klik-kla-klak-glug-gug-gack-mmm-mmmphl)

    It's not a surveillance cahmerah; it's a BEHAVIOUR MUHDIFICATION DEVOICE...

    The lettah kyuuu (Q) is too heavily linked to terrorism for the ahverage Yahnkee to handle discrately since 11 September 2001. It occuhrs freyquentlay in trahnsliteraytion from the Arabic: Al Qa'ida.

    One must not forget that there also exists the DemAAAAhnd DrAAAAAhft.

    Spit! SPitt! SPEWWWWWW! (ting! ting ting! kla-klakk!) (huff-puff-huff!) BAACK to NYOO YAWK TAWK!

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  70. Where did you go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OK, but where did you go?

  71. Re:eat my shorts slashdot !! by McGiraf · · Score: 1, Funny

    nom nom nom

  72. Fuck Paypal, Fuck eBay by myspace-cn · · Score: 1

    I only been a member since 2006, the whole time I only used Money Order, I've put up with scrolling to the bottom of every fucking offer to see if it was "Paypal Only" every fucking time at an extreme annoyance, I've also accidentally bid on shit that was Paypal only, only to be outbid luckily. (I asked on their fucking forums about that and they dodged the question completely as to how the fuck that could have happened.) I never ripped anybody off, I always paid on time, and have 100% positive. And have bought many items from $100-$350.

    eBay can go fuck themselves, the moment this rolls out.

  73. File a complaint! by greenrom · · Score: 1

    Ebay should have waited until December to announce this. Every two years in the fall, there's a brief window of time when Congress actually listens to voters instead of corporations. Write your representatives and tell them what you think. It's election season. They just might give a damn.

    While you're at it, let the DOJ know too:

    Citizen Complaint Center
    Antitrust Division
    950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
    Room 3322
    Washington, DC 20530

    Most states have their own laws regarding unfair competition. If you're ambitious, Google it and find other agencies that will take your complaint.

  74. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I really hate the fact that the site is swamped with commercial vendors rather than people selling stuff they don't need any more. eBay needs to be split into a marketplace where you can go to buy new things (like Amazon), and the good old auctioning of used personal stuff.

    We need more regulations? You may want some but I don't. eBay has commercial venders because it works for them. A person can unload old items they have, and make some money at it. Once people start making money from selling stuff on eBay they'll sell more and more until they reach the point where they need to decide if they want to turn it into a business or just keep it on the sideline. Are you proposing that if a person does want to start a business they need to move to a commercial auction site, and perhaps require a business license as well? If so have you thought about the potential ramifications? People sell on eBay because they can sell for profit while buyers buy from eBay because they can get good prices as well. It's good for both parties. If those who sell in volumes have move to commercial auction sites, who's going to be their buyers?

    Falcon

  75. Badges, Guns and NO Sense of Humor by T_O_M · · Score: 1

    Gee...
    Guess it's time to file a formal complaint with the USPS. The USPS Inspectors already HATE eBay and eBay sellers. Now eBay is going to (try) to BAN the use of a government sanctioned form of payment?
    This oughta get good real quick.

  76. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by anightowl · · Score: 1

    There *are* lots of alternative auction sites - Last count I found about 3 dozen in the US. Unfortunately most are relatively unknown. The biggest second tier true auction sites are OnlineAuction.com and eBid. There are niche sites that do very well, like etsy for handcrafters, and many others. There are also sites like iOffer (not really auctions) and Overstock.com that are big, but have large quantities of the same dropship junk that has flooded eBay lately. Your best bet for sites are like eBay *used to be* are OnlineAuction and ebid. You can get awesome deals, but just like the EB early days, you can't find everything. As a seller, well, sales are slow, but they do happen. Another good option to find things is GoogleBase. Craigslist is great, used with caution - there definitely are scammers on the site - sellers and buyers. No one can replace eBay *Yet*, but with the numbers of buyers and sellers leaving and moving slowly to the other sites there will be a tipping point somewhere along the line. eBay's only long term hope for survival is to reverse many of the new policies, but that isn't happening soon.

  77. OK, but what's the business case? by marxmarv · · Score: 1

    Google's core competency is maintaining an inventory of eyeballs for ads. Selling ads on an auction site is a bit of gymnastics I can't quite imagine.

    Also consider regulatory hurdles. Google Auctions won't happen in a Democratic FTC, because Google would be leveraging a monopoly. Google Auctions won't happen in a Republican FTC, because Meg Whitman is a GOP poster girl and big-business Republicans stick together.

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  78. USA-only websites by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    As long as things like Google Checkout and Amazon payments are only available to americans, eBay will stay king.

    1. Re:USA-only websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about. I don't need to use an American corporation to pay someone. I use iDEAL to pay someone.

    2. Re:USA-only websites by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      That's my point. I've never even HEARD of "iDEAL".

    3. Re:USA-only websites by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

      "As long as things like Google Checkout and Amazon payments are only available to americans, eBay will stay king."

      Lucky I'm in the UK and can also use Google Checkout then, eh?

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    4. Re:USA-only websites by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, Google Checkout is available in two countries instead of one. I'm still not impressed and my point stands.

  79. Re:alternatives - eBid.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serendipitously, eBid.net officially launched today in the U.S. See the news here. Their fees are far, far lower, and they want to grab all the customers eBay is going to lose.

  80. URL to close your account by chiph · · Score: 1

    Don't know if this works (waiting to see what happens), but it was given to me by their online chat help.

    http://contact.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ContactUs&wftype=2024&rcode=IV%25A00253&subject=Close%20my%20account&bcrumb=+Home+%3E+Help+Topics+%3E%A0Account+Information+and+Billing%A0%3E%A0Suspended+Account&instruction=&expirationDate=

    Such a shame, really. I've been buying stuff there for over 10 years, and have always paid with a Money Order.

    Chip H.

  81. Cool by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of taking money orders and checks anyway. Cuts down on gas, no trips to the post office. I will finally shut off my stupid PO box too.

  82. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Is there anywhere else? Ebay used to be 'the garage sale to the world'.

    There are plenty of online auction sites including Amazon. That's why it doesn't mean much if eBay wants people to use PayPal. If people don't like it they can go to another online auction service.

    Oh, and as for "garage sales", I'm pretty sure there are people who do what my sister used to do. She'd go to garage or yard sales to see if she could find things to buy she thought she could sell for a profit on eBay.

    Falcon

  83. Anyone notice the other changes? by grapeape · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://pages.ebay.com/sell/August2008Update/OtherFAQ/#3

    Fixed rate shipping on media (cd's, books, dvd's, etc), while it sounds good, in many cases their maximum allowed shipping and handling cost is several dollars less than the USPS flat rate box which is currently the cheapest way to ship. Their "faq" basically suggests that sellers just raise their prices. This leaves book rate as the only viable option, but try explaining to customers that they mey not get thier item for a month.

    IMHO this is nothing more than a further attempt to deter the mom and pop businesses they have been so eager to push out over the past couple years.

    If you read further you will also find they are eventually going to get rid of 3rd party checkout as well so regarless of whether you have your own credit card processing you will have to use ebay checkout.

    DSR's (Detailed Seller Ratings) are required at 4.3 or higher..which is great, but it has to be that way in the last 30 days...so you have to constantly sell things in order to keep it maintained. Bought a new laptop and want to sell the old one? You are no longer welcome at ebay and have to find a consigner.

    Ebay has forgotten who made it what it is, I dont know why they feel the need to be Amazon (actually amazon is more welcoming to the small seller) but I have a feeling this may finally be the push over the edge the rest of the old timers needed to bail on ebay and find something else to do.

  84. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Ender77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what EBAY wants. They want to get rid of the casual sellers(higher fees, forcing them to adopt one type of payment..etc) and only have commercial sales. They make way more money doing this. Of course this means that they are stabbing in the back, the seller base that made EBAY what it is. What we need is a NEW auction site to take away ebays crown.

  85. Buy through eBay, pay through eBay by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    What eBay is basically doing here is slowly phasing in a closed payment system. If you buy through eBay, you pay through eBay (PayPal). It's totally their perogative to do this. Of course, it's totally your perogative not to use eBay if this model doesn't agree with you. If enough people object to it, then it opens up an opportunity for someone else to step in and offer an auction site with open payment options. eBay competitors have failed before but perhaps this will change the landscape.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  86. Psst. buddy by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    before you say something really stupid-- like you've stopped using ebay and now use craigslist.

    do you know who is like a 25% owner of craigslist?

    that's like saying, I don't buy eggs from those chicken slaughtering farms, I buy them at the grocery store

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  87. You tell a coporation to not grow? by falconwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes I do.

    Growth is the sole raison d' être for a corporation.

    No it isn't. The sole purpose of a corporation is to serve the common good or pubic good. The first corporations granted corporate charters were the Honourable East India Company in 1600 and the Dutch East India Company in 1602. Both India Companies were shipping businesses, the Honourable company shipping goods between Britain and India and the Dutch operating between India and the Netherlands. Shipping was a risky business, a ship could be attacked by pirates, the crew could mutiny, or the ship could run into bad weather. And the ship's owner was liable for any and all cargo lost as well as for the lives of the crew. If for whatever reason a ship was lost that could bankrupt the owners. So the British and Dutch governments granted corporate charters to these companies which gave them limited liability. With limited liability the most an owner could lose is the amount they invested.

    But because of this limited liability corporations were only granted charters if they served the public good. Once a business no longer served it it could have it's corporate charter revoked. Unfortunately as foreseen by Thomas Jefferson corporations became too powerful so they are no longer held to the standards of serving the public good.

    Falcon

    1. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      he sole purpose of a corporation is to serve the common good or pubic good. The first corporations granted corporate charters were the Honourable East India Company in 1600 and the Dutch East India Company in 1602.

      Funny how British colonization served the common good. Wait...

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    2. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Funny how British colonization served the common good. Wait...

      The common good of Britons, sure. They didn't give a flying fuck in a rolling donut about the Indians.

    3. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody else does, why should they?

    4. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure all the vendors of V14GR4 also serve the pubic good.

      Hmm...maybe that's why we get so much spam.

    5. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by dkone · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that Ebay may be attacked by pirates?

    6. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately corporations aren't what they used to be. The concept is about serving the public good but nowadays "the public good" seems to have been redefined to "the shareholders' dividend", consequences be damned.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, by your definition the sole purpose of a doctor would be to cast magic spells.

      Reactionaries are hilarious.

    8. Re:You tell a coporation to not grow? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately corporations aren't what they used to be. The concept is about serving the public good but nowadays "the public good" seems to have been redefined to "the shareholders' dividend", consequences be damned.

      Yea, there needs to be a renewed effort to revoke corporate charters.

      Falcon

  88. Speak up! by net_shaman · · Score: 1

    Tell the greedy f@cks that you'll cancel your Ebay and Paypal accounts if they try to pull this crap.

  89. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by webbroberts · · Score: 1

    Sparc stations? Craigslist?

    I think freecycle has filled that void.

  90. Where is your proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't exhibit to the general public a lot number, the title to the property being sold, and the district where the property is to be found then how do we know or not if you are just an anti-eBay shill that just likes to sing along but doesn't know what it means...don't know what it means when I say yeah?

    I have a reason to hate eBay. Her name is Beatlejew Beatlejew Bea - tle - jew!

  91. Oh, the arrogance gets even better (see #2 below): by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't use an echeck for payment unless you already have a paypal account.

    If you're creating a new account, you have two options for authorization:

    1) Give paypal the ABA and account info and they will make two small random deposits in 2-4 working days. You then confirm the dates and amounts.

    OR

    2) Give paypal your online username and password to your bank account and they will log in to your account, verify that those work and authorize your account instantly.

    Riiiight.

    I couldn't believe I'd heard this, and called as a merchant to verify. Sure enough. When I asked them what they'd smoked for breakfast, they fell into the script "Of course you know paypal is the most secure, reliable and trusted online payment--" *click*

    I told the client to send me a check in the mail.

    Let's hope the banks are still functioning.

  92. What I wonder... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1
    I don't use a credit card.

    I don't believe in credit cards.

    I wonder how many people out there can't GET a credit card.

    I'm not a goofus moron that has no credit, I just choose not to pay exorberant amounts of interest to some faceless bank to use their money temporarily... money that happens to be in my account, and readily available.

    Without these options, I guess we purists have no on-line options.

    Sad.

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
    1. Re:What I wonder... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I'm not a goofus moron that has no credit, I just choose not to pay exorberant amounts of interest to some faceless bank to use their money temporarily... money that happens to be in my account, and readily available.

      You're a goofus moron for not seeing how credit cards work in your favor. The money is in your account, readily available? Why not have it earn interest for an extra couple weeks until you need to pay the credit card bill?

      If you carry a balance on a credit card, you're doing it wrong. If you pay in full every month, you're actually *making* money from the interest-free credit your card issuer extends to you.

      My daily-use card has an $11k limit. I charge almost everything to this card, then pay it off in full every month. My typical bill is around $3k. Over the course of a year, not only do I have the airline miles from the card, but I also make around an extra $50 in interest from my bank, since my money sits in my account for longer.

      Without these options, I guess we purists have no on-line options.

      Yeah, I used to be a cash-on-the-barrel type of guy, but when I realized I was giving up free money... well, I changed my tune. As for on-line purchasing, if you're a "purist" (which some people might call a luddite), then why are you shopping online anyway?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  93. Re:So long USPO Money Order, the best option to pa by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In fact, a good way to tell the legitimacy of the seller, especially if they were a "private" seller, is to see if they would accept a USPO money order.

    As a seller, I used to love the USPS money order, and gave a discount (I think it was around 5%) to anyone who paid with it. I'd cash in the money order while dropping the package off at the post office (which was right down the street from my house). Cleared instantly, no chargebacks, no bounced checks, no need to go to the bank *before* shipping. It was well worth giving away the discount, which was more than the what I'd have paid in paypal fees.

  94. Cheque by Samah · · Score: 1

    For a moment I thought "checks" meant "security checks" and I starting to get worried. Then I realised they actually meant "cheques", and had somehow misspelled it.

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  95. Are you sure you want that? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Banks tend to have ridiculous security measures.

    No, I don't mean "ridiculously secure", I mean ridiculously annoying, and ridiculous that anyone believes they make it more secure.

    I'm particularly looking at the wish-it-was two-factor authentication. I absolutely do not want that on PayPal.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  96. Ebay? by coolgeek · · Score: 1

    They're still around?

    --

    cat /dev/null >sig
  97. Re:So long USPO Money Order, the best option to pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, you'd have loved me. I've been known to mail people cash because I hate paypal, couldn't be bothered to get a money order for a $10 purchase, and didn't want to wait for a check to clear before the seller would send my item.

    And you know what? Not once did anyone ever fail to send my item when I mailed them cash.

  98. So, the alternatives? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Slashdot as a whole seems to have a pretty negative attitude towards eBay; if it's not their policies, it's their practices, or proposed practices.

    So where are the alternatives? I don't do any online auction stuff, so I don't know of any, but I've rarely seen any +4/+5 posts with a competing auction site in them.

    I propose that we, as Slashdot, list what we use (if any) as an alternative to eBay. Amazon? Craigslist? Something else? Then, when something is posted, people can swing their mod points around and up/down something based on their agreement (trying not to harm the user's karma, of course). Not quite the way the mod system is supposed to work, but useful.

    While we're at it, alternatives to PayPal would be useful, as well.

    Actually, has there been an Ask Slashdot on this? If not, perhaps it's time for one.

  99. Could be worse by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    You could create a clearing house for junk loans and secure them with taxpayer dollars... oops!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  100. eBay by oldhack · · Score: 1

    It seems like eBay is a dinosaur in its slow decline, maintained only by the massive inertia. Ripe time for competitors to pull the rug underneath their feet? As for inertia, there is no perpetual motion machine, you know.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  101. common good by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Funny how British colonization served the common good.

    Well incorporating isn't the same as colonization.

    Falcon

  102. Does anyone remember Yahoo auctions? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Yahoo tried for quite a while to compete with eBay. But the momentum was against them. So they shut it down.

    Sounds like the time is right to dust off that code and open them back up. eBay is losing a LOT of the people who made it happen so if there's another 'named' auction site the transition will be rather swift.

    The other sites mentioned are either 'fixed price' sites (not actual auctions) or are niche markets where you're not going to get the eyeballs that will make it worth your while.

    I tried using one of the niche sites to find some books I wanted. The seller NEVER bothered to respond to my e-mail. Tells you how committed he was to that site. And yes, I know that happens on eBay too. But if you're going through the effort to post on a niche site you might occasionally check on your auctions.

  103. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by bogidu · · Score: 1

    UBid & Overstock Auctions are two off of the top of my head. One thing that people don't seem to do is change auction houses when ebay pisses them off. Ebay got as large as it is due to timing, luck, & and hard work . . . . the net is big enough for more than one auction house, someone just needs to figure out what it would take to start luring sellers. Buyers would automatically start showing up for the great deals before an equilibrium was reached.

  104. EBAY? by ps2os2 · · Score: 1

    I stopped using PAYPAL because their servers been hacked so many times I have lost count. Its a simple thing to do really.

    Just say NO to EBAY.

  105. Fuck eBay and the Viking ship they came on by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Fuck eBay and Paypal. That is all. Now toddle off and sell some more old broken shit.

    1. Re:Fuck eBay and the Viking ship they came on by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Us Vikings are insulted by your attempt to associate us with those scumbags.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  106. More Corrections by mpapet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They allow you to move money from your bank account to your paypal account.
    So do any number of gift cards. Sorry. Not a bank.

    They allow you to elect to make payments from your paypal "balance"
    As do gift cards, a positive balance on any given utility, your cable bill, etc.

    They offer a "debit card" that draws from your paypal "balance".
    Any company with a few thousand customers could do the same thing. Visa pays a bounty in the $40/per sale range. It's a Visa product originated by a Visa member bank with an Ebay logo on it. Other than the bounty and providing a logo for the card, Ebay knows nothing and has nothing to do with the branded debit card.

    If someone sends you funds, it goes towards this balance.
    When you pay a bill it does the same thing... Your average utility/store credit card is not a registered bank. They may use something that SOUNDS like a bank, but they do not offer simple interest savings accounts, originate home and business loans, provide business banking services... I could go on and on.

    If they put a hold on your account, they deny you access to this "balance" that is your money.
    This is not banking. I don't care if you think it is, it simply isn't.

    Bottom line: I know Paypal sucks, but they are not a bank. Not even close. You and the informative moderators don't have a clue how it works. Please learn something from this post.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:More Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They offer a "debit card" that draws from your paypal "balance". --
      Any company with a few thousand customers could do the same thing. Visa pays a bounty in the $40/per sale range. It's a Visa product originated by a Visa member bank with an Ebay logo on it. Other than the bounty and providing a logo for the card, Ebay knows nothing and has nothing to do with the branded debit card.
      -----------
      Wrong, please read it again, emphasis "balance"

    2. Re:More Corrections by penguinbrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your average utility/store credit card is not a registered bank.

      Well, duhh... That's not their business, but they are BACKED by such in such lender/bank who are regulated. I just did a simple random search of a few stores, and all the cards are backed by such a place.

      Comparing Paypal to a utility bill, or ANY bill is not even close to being fair let alone accurate - if you overpay someone, they are required to refund you your money or you can go after them. This 'refund' usually is just applied to your next bill - although, if you close your account they send you a check regardless if you were a bad customer or not.

      Comparing them to 'gift cards' is more accurate although at the same time, gift cards are not used as banks in which Paypal actively encourages you to do so, and makes them selves "look" like one. Essentially it should come down to something as simple as how much money goes through the account - a gift card usually has a max limit of a $100 or something like this, Paypal has $1000's upon $1000's going through it.

      Even the quick payday loan shops who charge 30% interest and worse than any given collections joint - even they are regulated at some extent. Paypal is just exploiting loopholes to the max.

    3. Re:More Corrections by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      I see; you're right, they're not a bank. They just offer free(?) online checking accounts.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

  107. Ooops... by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm not using E-bay for a while. Sorry, but this kind of bullshit is wrong, no matter what excuses they have for it.

    It ain't about helping the consumer.

  108. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.powersellersunite.com/auctionsitewatch.php
    Has some competition and data listed.
    Unfortunately I don't think any are auction format which is a shame (and the format eBay is veering from more and more).
    Still, if we all list and buy a little at other sites it could help.

  109. Bingo! by mpapet · · Score: 1

    It seems to me like PayPal is acting a lot like an introducing broker.

    That's exactly what they are doing and they get some kind of bounty for each customer captured by the scheme. This is not new or unique in the financial world. You could do the same thing with a few hundred thousand active customers.

    Paypal sucks and all of the animosity generated recently is warranted. They utterly failed maximizing value and totally avoided disrupting the payment overlords. Instead, they make it progressively harder to use paypal. It is only a matter of time before whatever market value they have created is destroyed by the seat-warmers and procedure-makers in executive management.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  110. Re:Psst. buddy by anightowl · · Score: 2, Informative

    True, eBay does own some of Craigslist, but CL would love nothing better than to boot them out. http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/05/unlawful-and-unfair/

  111. I agree. Here's how it should work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The content distribution should be torrent based freeNET by a series of 802.11cowboyneal satelites. Our userID should be the bonding date and given name (not legal name, because clan/tribe have nothing to do with commerce). We type what we are exactly looking for, and it is the seller not the auction company administration that makes the marketting calls. The domain is stock-based for participation, measured in duration of trade and spoilage, securities attached to the proprty as tenable and titled to assure proof of claim and quit claim at close, and as insurance for pending and conditional sales that revert to the lien holder to discharge tax and liabilities either contracted or impelled. The auction form shall be dynamic to the will of the property owner, and offers of value are to be accepted in the denomination of currency, cache, money, or unappraised trade for property declared as equaly acceptable determined by the owner.

    Telemarketers become guildsmen, under oath and respected. Shatan become obedient and repent. Christ the ruler, not Stanley, not Sears' Craftsman, not Husky, not 3M, not Office Depot, not Office Max, not Walmart.

  112. FUCK EBAY! FUCK THEM IN THE ASS! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Sorry. LOTS of rage at EBay. After buying selling responsibly for a number of years, and getting fucked by other sellers and buyers and getting no assistance from EBay (they got their shekel, they don't care), I refuse to give them ANY more money. EVER. I closed out my PayPal account. I closed out my EBay account.

    The final straw was getting sold a laptop that was actually stolen property, and the merchant refusing to even ATTEMPT to make it right. I spent several months badgering EBay to make it right, but the SOB is STILL a power seller on EBay today.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  113. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by tftp · · Score: 1

    In case of the local newspaper the customer will call you and later show up at your house to inspect the item, and if all is well then he will pay in cash and take the item. If you sell on Craigslist the buyer can be anywhere, and then you have to deal with shipping and payments (and escrow, and returns etc.)

  114. they did - froogle by vaporland · · Score: 1

    have you heard of it? thought not...

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  115. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    eBay's strength isn't it's auction functionality. That bit is just a gimmick to addict a few people.

    eBay's real strength is it's categorization. Although far from perfect, it is better than any other classified ad site on the market. Probably because the other classified sites don't realize what market they're really in. They think they're in the buggy whip and wagon wheel business, So it's no surprise that the car manufacturer is eating their lunches.

    But mark, the market likes to relax to the point where goods' prices are close to their marginal cost. And eBay's scheme of skimming off the top is the kind of inefficiency that can last only so long as they can keep a stranglehold on their monopoly.

    The eBay killer is not another auction site. It's a classified ad site with auction widgets and a database with lots of things to filter on. One that encourages listers to properly and correctly classify their offerings, and charges based on bandwidth, CPU, and storage space, rather than final selling price.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  116. Incorrect. by S-100 · · Score: 1

    the summary is incorrect. Sellers can accept payment methods other than PayPal, but they may not promote them in their auction ads. If a buyer asks if a check or money order is acceptable, the seller is free to accept it. Totally stupid.

  117. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    To clarify: by "with auction widgets" I meant to say a variety of page templates for postings, some of which offer auction-like functionality, for items whose rarity makes valuation difficult, or sellers who like blink tags.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  118. Paypal vs Checks/M.O. by sfm · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that, for identical items, those sellers allowing checks/Money-Orders will generally have a higher final bid than those requiring a paypal account ??? It seems that the market is adjusting to the perceived risk of checks and the prices are higher. I wonder if Ebay management realizes this will reduce profits.

  119. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh? If a commercial vendor is on ebay, chances are their prices are close to retail (sometimes even more!). Filter out a certain price range in your searches and guess what you're left with...

  120. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private."

    Once you have won the auction, you are indebted to the seller. Being as such, you may pay cash and eBay can't do shit about it if you so choose.

  121. Solution by netringer · · Score: 1

    cat "ebay.com 127.0.0.1" >> /etc/hosts

    No more ripoffs.

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  122. Re:They failed in Australia, and yet they try agai by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Yeh, in Australia the ACCC kicked their asses good.

    The following was my reply to EBay's mail regarding the suspension of the "PayPal only" change, back in June;

    "Let me be perfectly clear. If I am forced to use pay pal only I will stop using ebay completely forever and use another auction siye.

    I am glad our government has prevented your blatant profiteering regading pay pal.

    The arrogance of your company in attempting this frankly disgusts me."

    Pity about my proof reading though ): I really should learn to type properly. It's only 34 years since I started learning.

    I suspect they got a LOT of similar mails from users.

  123. eBay going down! by wshwe · · Score: 1

    eBay is doing everything they can to destroy their own business.

  124. Restraint of Trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe this would be called restraint of trade.
    When you interfere with how a business receives payment, Or dictate how they get paid. Thats a
    restraint of trade.

    Also seems to blur that "venue" shield they wave around.

  125. If you regulate them they will offshore by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    This is what they did when it was ruled that they were subject to FSA rules in the UK. from the link:

    A third of all adults in the UK - around 15 million people - now have a PayPal account. That is an account primarily used to buy and sell online. Customers are currently protected by the Financial Services Authority which regulates PayPal and also have the right to complain to the Financial Ombudsman. Now the PayPal headquarters is moving to Luxembourg it will no longer be regulated by the FSA.

    As the have no branches and only a virtual presence they can be run anywhere. Where would US operations be run from. Bermuda? Guantanamo? Somewhere beyond the reach of the regulatory organisations anyway.

    1. Re:If you regulate them they will offshore by mysidia · · Score: 1

      As the have no branches and only a virtual presence they can be run anywhere. Where would US operations be run from. Bermuda? Guantanamo? Somewhere beyond the reach of the regulatory organisations anyway.

      PayPal would be in dire straits if they could not do business in the US due to offshoring. They are owned by eBay, and liability for any major illegal actions of PayPal should ultimately be extended to eBay.

      To do business in the US, they still have to follow US rules, or face legal action against them. Failing to contest such actions against them should lead to them being found guilty, and barred from soliciting US customers.

      They can be treated like the orgs that are complicit with Online gambling or Money laundering are handled, and barred from evading rules by force (freezing assets).

      Banks and other financial orgs that have a US presence should be legally required to refrain from doing business with such banned organizations upon delivery of the proper orders, or face fines/seizure of their own assets.

      Offshore organization's ability to perform electronic transfers based on amounts denominated in USD or EUR should be similarly regulated, unless there is a treaty between our country and the country they would be offshoring to that sets out some regulatory requirements.

  126. Quality not quantity by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not quantity of regulation that you want, it's quality.

    Maybe the government shouldn't use a heavy hand but a good hand instead?

    After all the heavy hand of government is handing out taxpayer money to the companies involved in the recent financial crisis.

    Sure it may be necessary.

    But perhaps the hand of the government should have skimmed off profits from all those financial companies during the good times, and kept that money in a Bailout Fund to be used for bailing them out. That'll be fairer right? Every 10 years they go bust, and they keep saying "No you shouldn't regulate us" and "You have to bail us out". Yeah right.

    --
  127. We need BETTER regulation not less or more by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't need more or less regulations. You need better regulations.

    You don't need more or less government, you need better government. Code quality is not strongly correlated to the number of lines of code.

    Less regulation does not mean a better state of things (nor does more regulation either).

    For instance, if it were up to me, I'd have imposed a "Bailout Tax" or levy on all companies in the financial industry during the good times. The money goes to a Bailout Fund.

    Then during the bad times, the Bailout Fund is used to bail out companies. If the fund is not enough, the bailout tax is increased. If bailouts aren't needed after a few decades and the industry "grows up", the tax is reduced/removed, (but the fund is still kept just in case).

    The other industries seem to manage themselves better and not have to run to "Mama" every decade. So as long as they haven't grown up, they need extra rules.

    During the good times, they get all the money, and during the bad times the taxpayers have to pay? Yes there are already corporate taxes, but do they really cover the bailouts?

    As someone said, what we have here is: privatize the gain and socialize the pain.

    We need better regulation than that.

    --
    1. Re:We need BETTER regulation not less or more by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      if it were up to me, I'd have imposed a "Bailout Tax" or levy on all companies in the financial industry during the good times. The money goes to a Bailout Fund.

      It sounds like that is what's needed now.

      The other industries seem to manage themselves better and not have to run to "Mama" every decade. So as long as they haven't grown up, they need extra rules.

      I'm not sure there's an industry that has grown up, except some illegal ones.

      During the good times, they get all the money, and during the bad times the taxpayers have to pay? Yes there are already corporate taxes, but do they really cover the bailouts?

      Businesses don't get all the money, like during the '90s most people's lives in the US improved. As for bailouts, I don't particularly like them, just as individuals should businesses should plan for bad tymes. Actually I'd prefer to help individuals than businesses. Unfortunately in tymes like now things, people and businesses, are so interdependent to be effective with trying to help people you basically have to bailout businesses too.

      Falcon

  128. Re:This will hurt US international sellers and Eba by jimicus · · Score: 1

    he has to call up the credit agency in its respective country and verify that the shipping address and billing address are the same. Interestingly enough, some banks (particularly in the UK) will flat out refuse to give you this information - even a simple yes or no response when you give them the address you have is against their policy.

    That's because the UK has legislation specifically blocking this - the Data Protection Act.

    I believe card transactions in the UK can be put through in such a fashion that the billing address must match the card's registered address or the transaction will be declined (and so if you enforce this, the next logical step is to only ship to the billing address) but I don't know if this works internationally. Probably not because there isn't an international standard for how addresses should be written or communicated.

  129. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an alternative, at least in the UK, that I use in place of eBay - www.gumtree.com.

    Totally free (for small-midsized items), lots of members, and i've posted items with my phone number and received a call 10 minutes later and sold the item cash in hand. Fantastic!

  130. No, there aren't by Rix · · Score: 1

    None of those places allow buyers or sellers to access the marketplace that Ebay has a monopoly on.

  131. Really? by Rix · · Score: 1

    Can you sell to the same market? Unless Ebay is listing those auctions, then no, you can't.

  132. ...and $700 Billion. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    If Wall Street gets that money then Washington should get a cut of the action. I'm not sure how it can be dealt with though, not all businesses financial or otherwise used questionable practices but if the ones that did are bailed out then it sends the message that government will take care of you even if you do bad things.

    I'd had CNN on almost all day and I kept hearing about how McCain has criticized Obama for not releasing a plan to deal with the financial crisis but to me McCain is reacting too fast. We don't need to treat the symptoms but not do anything about the cause, and I don't think more regulations is the solution. Better ones perhaps but not more. So I'll wait for Obama's plan. Not that I support either one, I don't.

    Falcon

  133. Re:This will hurt US international sellers and Eba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when the customers contact him through Ebay, ethically he has to complete the sale through Ebay (or lose his merchant account).

    I'm not sure what you mean by "contact", but if he puts an item on eBay and someone buys it, he's not just ethically required to complete the sale that way but also LEGALLY. It's a binding contract.

    Honestly, if your boss doesn't get that, I feel less than sorry for his other problems, because I've gotten burnt by this before myself, as a buyer, and I can tell you it's extremely annoying.

  134. No more ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped using Ebay when they doubled their prices, and explained that it was only a marginal increase, because most items sold for x amount. Meaning what? That they consider all the money passing through their fingers as theirs?

    Until they stop being so greedy, I'm staying clear of them.

  135. I signed up to eBay once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to buy something. Ad said that paypal wasn't required. Signed up and went through the buying process and at the "payment" page was told I needed a paypal account to pay.

    So I cancelled my eBay account and told them that I was closing the account because to use it I had to sign up to PayPal and have no wish to.

  136. Just used it... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    I just posted an item to be sold and it gave me a message that I was not a sufficiently qualified seller to use payment options other than paypal but it implied that I could become so-qualified with more positive seller ratings. I went ahead and posted my item and then I went into the 'edit' mode and the editing allowed me to add a bunch of additional payment options including check and money order...so I added them.

    1. Re:Just used it... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      So why didn't you post a link to your item so Slashdotters could drive up the price?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  137. Re:So long USPO Money Order, the best option to pa by LatencyKills · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the buyer's POV I'll say that the money order was perfect for me. I get the money order and drop it in the mail in one easy motion at the post office, and I never have to worry that my credit card number is out there. My total exposure is limited to the amount of the money order. I'll also add that I never even once was ripped off on Ebay. I also never bought an item over $40. Anyway, with this move, I'm done with Ebay, not that I was ever a big part of it I'm sure, but there are probably millions of casual buyers like myself, picking up maybe a dozen schotskis a year, and I think that portion of the business is going to all but die now.

    --
    Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
  138. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by dkone · · Score: 1

    I used to be that guy, always sold my good used 'toys' on Ebay. Not anymore, and it wasn't the competition from the power sellers that made me stop, it was Ebay with their constant upping of fees. By the way, all my auctions always said "no paypal accepted, money orders only." Why? Paypal cost me money. I sell everything on Craigslist now. Why do you think Ebay went after them? Ebay knows Craigslist is what they used to be.

    DK

  139. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by dkone · · Score: 1

    craigslist.org - It is what Ebay was

  140. PayPal Conspiracy by t2000kw · · Score: 1

    I didn't read all posts here, but I wanted to add that you used to be able to auction items on eBay and allow a "PayPal cash" only payment, one that did not use a credit card for payment through PayPal. Not long ago, eBay disallowed that and said that if you offer PayPal, you can no longer have that restriction. This meant that if you received a payment through PayPal and a credit card was used in the transaction, you ether had to have their Premier account or upgrade to that type of account. (When you receive notice of your first payment with a credit card through PayPal and you have a personal account, you have to upgrade before you can receive the payment.) This doesn't sound so bad, even when you consider that they will take out of the transaction 1.9% to 2.9% + $0.30 USD, but here's the catch. If you have a personal account, you don't pay anything on money received or sent. Once you "upgrade" (that's what they call it, an upgrade) to a Premier account, you pay a fee on ALL transactions where you receive money, not just on thise where the person sending you a payment used a credit card. The work-around here is to have two bank accounts and two PayPal accounts, of course. My work-around has been to allow payments by USPS money order or contact me for other payment options (which would include PayPal cash payments--I just can't say in the auction description that I accept PayPal if I ONLY accept PayPal cash). Once they begin the PayPal only for eBay payments, I will no longer sell on eBay. I have been doing well on Craigslist selling items I no longer need. Since there is no fee penalties using a PayPal account to pay for things (from the buyer's point of view), I do use PayPal as a fairly secure payment method, using a second bank account that I transfer money to when I am going to make a payment through PayPal. (I keep the balance low and transfer money on an as-needed basis just in case PayPal has a security breach.) I see one of two things happening here. The US government might step in like Austrailia did and force eBay to allow other payment methods. Or, some other auction entity will start up an eBay-like company and be more fair about the whole thing. (There are quite a number of eBay issues that bother people, mostly sellers, but that is another issue.)

  141. Ebay Alternatives - uBid, eBid, etc... by Tronster · · Score: 1

    I just Googled "Ebay Alternative" and was glad to find many options. A bunch are outlined right on: http://www.salehoo.com/blog/sick-of-ebay-try-these-alternative-places-to-sell/

    With the exception of Netflix, I find that expressing grievances with business practices to large companies usually has little effect. Legal shakedown seems to be the only thing CEOs understand, and that's because litigation is potentially bad for their stock value.

    It's easier for me to just jump to another company that doesn't feel the need to sacrifice customer service (in this case standard payment options) in order to achieve a better revenue stream. Hello uBid!

    1. Re:Ebay Alternatives - uBid, eBid, etc... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      But will these other companies handle grievances any better? For example, uBid's HTML is broken and displays badly on a major web browser. Would they fix it if I report the problem? Would it be good enough to report it to their webmaster? Or would I have to report it to the CEO?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Ebay Alternatives - uBid, eBid, etc... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and good luck finding anything but your typical mass-market closeout junk on those sites. That's the whole problem: many of us use Ebay to find rare things, obscure things, collectors' items, etc., which aren't easily found anywhere else. This is what made Ebay such a great place in the beginning, as it was like a huge international yard sale. But now, they're making it harder for sellers of these things to do business, in favor of mega-sellers selling tons of cheap Chinese junk and closeout junk. You can still get the good stuff on Ebay, but with the jacked-up fees, it's not such a good deal any more, but it's better than going to other auction sites which don't even have what you're looking for.

      It's a chicken-and-egg problem.

  142. Re:This will hurt US international sellers and Eba by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I think what the OP means is that eBay's TOS forbid initiating a transaction or communication via eBay.com and then completing it elsewhere.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  143. What about the Mature Audiences Catagory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the rules "Important: PayPal may not be used to pay for any item listed in eBay's Mature Audiences category."
    How do you buy or sell things in that category now?

  144. Re:Psst. buddy by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    ebay in a slimey way, bought their stake in Craigslist from a former Craigslist Employee. Craig would buy them back if he could and Craigslist Stock is not publicly traded so the likelihood of ebay taking over Craigslist is slim and none.

  145. Short selling EBAY by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I don't have any stock in EBAY, anymore. I already sold it years ago in disgust. Now I guess it's time to short their stock and profit from their misery.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  146. Re:This will hurt US international sellers and Eba by rthomanek · · Score: 1

    So what is the problem? From what you described, the priority of your former boss was minimizing the RISK (very aggressively, nearly ignoring other variables). Did he still expect to make PROFIT?

    Anyway, I don't really see how this is related to eBay/ PayPal problem apart from the fact that the story you told uses it as an example...

  147. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I rant to my wife about it too, and she completely agrees with me.

  148. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I still use Ebay a fair amount. The problem is that there really aren't any decent alternatives to it, except for Craigslist which is only good for local stuff (which usually means large items which can't be cheaply shipped, like furniture, appliances, etc.), and not for small, easily shippable, rare or specialty items. I've checked other auction sites like "ecrater", but they just don't have the selection that Ebay has. For instance, if I need a new inverter for my laptop, and it needs to be part number "PK070006T00", there's a very good chance I'll find it on Ebay. There's virtually no chance I'll find it on a competing site. Worse, now that I've gotten really pissed off with Ebay for their high fees and other antics, and the poor way they handled a bad transaction recently, I try a lot more to find independent web sites so I can just buy directly from the seller, and let us both avoid Ebay and its fees. But when I look for items like this, I usually find sites with much, much higher prices; the bargain sellers are still on Ebay. Even with the added fees and such, it's usually much cheaper to buy on Ebay. And that whole thing about inflated shipping fees? That's also a problem on many independent websites I've been to. I recently had to buy some cheap rubber gaskets for a blender, and I had places wanting to charge me $10 for shipping, even though they had their own merchant account and had no good reason to jack up shipping fees like Ebay sellers do.

  149. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I disagree. The categorization is useful I suppose, but I usually find stuff on Ebay by doing a keyword search, not browsing. The thing that's useful about Ebay is that it allows sellers to cheaply list items to sell, and allows buyers to easily find them (with both browsing and searching). The auction format isn't essential, but it is very useful; many people don't know the true value of their goods, and the auction format allows the market to find that true value more efficiently. I recently listed a bunch of old Nintendo Power magazines (and the forerunners to it) from the late 80s that I had sitting in a box. I was quite surprised when the auction ended and the lot had fetched about $110. I wasn't expecting to get more than $20. Similarly, sellers who have an inflated opinion of their item's value will quickly find out how much people are really willing to pay for it with an auction. Even with reserve prices, if they relist several times and never get over 1/2 their reserve price, they'll realize that it just isn't worth that much.

    I think the combination of the auction format, and the locationless, internet-based nature of Ebay is what made it succeed so brilliantly. Any replacement will probably need the same features.

  150. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it's not. Ebay was never tied to a specific location, and made it easy to find items no matter where they were located. Craigslist is too local in nature. It's great if you want to buy a secondhand piece of furniture, and are willing to move it yourself, because you can look through listings by people near you. It's great for sellers because it's totally free. But if you want to buy a replacement laptop part, or a CD, it's totally useless: there's no reason to constrain yourself to your local metro area in searching for that, since the cost of shipping is generally very low for such items, and a better value than spending a few hours driving across town to pick it up in person.

    When I want to buy or sell furniture, cars, or find a landscaping service, I get on Craigslist. If I want to find a rare CD, buy an iPod charger, or a replacement laptop part, I go to Ebay.

  151. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Yes. Of course second issue is that I have not seen a REAL item for sale there in what - six months? It's always some cheap chinese knockoffs that just get relisted if sold as auction.
    Powerseller these days is a put-off instead of a promise of smooth transaction. New users in 5-10 tx range seem to be much more reliable.

  152. Re:This will hurt US international sellers and Eba by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yep, there's a bunch of sellers who advertise by Ebay, but then get a buyer to buy some other way, and then take down the Ebay auction claiming it was "lost or broken". It might not be strictly legal (as it violates their contract with Ebay), but good luck prosecuting that. Worse, it's not even "illegal", as it's not a criminal offense to my knowledge, it's a tort. So Ebay would have to sue the seller to get any justice, and again, good luck with that. The legal fees would far outweigh anything they could regain from some guy selling crap out of his basement.

  153. Re:If you don't like thier policy, go somewhere el by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    If you agreed to a contract that prohibits cash payment then there is nothing you can do. Legally any one can refuse to accept a hash payment, or even make special requirements for the payment such as no $50s or $100s after 8pm. A common policy at gas stations.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  154. monopolies by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Can you sell to the same market? Unless Ebay is listing those auctions, then no, you can't.

    There are services and software that allows people to monitor auctions on different websites. However like eBay other auction sites don't allow people to bid or sell on items from other online auction websites. That doesn't make them all monopolies.

    Falcon

  155. Amazon Auctions by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    This is the first time in quite a few years that I've heard someone mention the (defunct) Amazon Auctions service as if it were active.

    Not having heard Amazon's auction was defunct I googled it and found this "Amazon vs. eBay: Battle of the Online Auctions" from 31 January 2008. It was the third result out of more than 3 million. Restricting the search to just the past month still results in about 137,000. E-Commerce News published the article "Online Auctions, Part 1: The eBay Earthquake" on 9 September. In it there's this: "By restructuring its fees, eBay is likely attempting to ratchet up its competitiveness with Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) Latest News about Amazon.com, which has no listing fees." So they didn't know Amazon went defunct either. Also in the ad area to the right there's an ad for Amazon Auctions, now why would Amazon be buying add for a service that doesn't exist anymore?

    On the other hand, I don't see auctions listed on Amazon, so maybe it's only been recently that Amazon stopped auctioning. What I find ironic if true is that the first result searching Amazon for auction is "How to Sell Anything on Amazon...and Make a Fortune!".

    Falcon

  156. At least porn is excluded by Chess+Piece+Face · · Score: 1

    From the FAQ:

    "Are there any categories excluded from these payment requirements?

    Vehicles (Motors), capital equipment (Business & Industrial), Mature Audiences and Real Estate will be excluded from the new payment requirements."

    You can still pay for the necessities by check!

  157. How to convert eBay customers by tepples · · Score: 1

    But when the customers contact him through Ebay, ethically he has to complete the sale through Ebay

    But once the purchase is complete on Amazon, eBay, or wherever, he can put an ad for his own web site on the packing list, enticing customers with offers of free shipping for domestic orders or reduced shipping for international orders.

  158. It does make Ebay a monopoly by Rix · · Score: 1

    Because they control the online auction market. It's absurd to suggest otherwise.

    1. Re:It does make Ebay a monopoly by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Because they control the online auction market.

      I suggest you read, and learn, the definition of "monopoly". eBay is not a monopoly. However even if it were, being a monopoly isn't illegal. What is illegal is to use a monopoly position to use that position anticompetitively. eBay compeats with other on online auction services and doesn't try to block others from compeating. At least I have not heard of any such attempts, do you have any references to any accusations or lawsuits saying they do?

      It's absurd to suggest otherwise.

      What's absurd it to improperly use a word. Get a dictionary and look up word definitions sometime.

      Faclon

  159. It's best to read your own links, dumbass by Rix · · Score: 1

    Down in the business law section of that page (you know, the part pertinent to the discussion) we find this definition:

    Monopoly
    A commercial advantage enjoyed by only one or a select few companies in which only those companies can trade in a certain area.

    If we go back to my original post, which you obviously didn't read, we have this:

    Ebay holds a fully locked down monopoly, and they need to be regulated as such.

    Nowhere did I say Ebay is "illegal", just that they hold a commanding market position and need to prevented from making anti-competitive moves. Like the ones in TFA, which you also did not apparently read. Did you even read the /. summary?

    1. Re:It's best to read your own links, dumbass by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Down in the business law section of that page (you know, the part pertinent to the discussion) we find this definition:

      What page? I provided two kinks. Pertinent? Maybe to you but not to me. eBay has plenty o f competition and therefore is not a monopoly.

      If we go back to my original post, which you obviously didn't read, we have this:

      I read it, then in reply I provided a link to the definition of monopoly. A "board game", eBay is not a board game. "exclusive control or possession of something", eBay does not have exclusive control or possession of auctions. A "market in which there are many buyers but only one seller", eBay has many buyer and sellers, and there are other online auctions with more buyers and sellers as well.

      Nowhere did I say Ebay is "illegal", just that they hold a commanding market position

      A commanding market position is not a monopoly though.

      and need to prevented from making anti-competitive moves.

      Agreed. But more regulations are not needed. There are already anticompetitive and antitrust laws on the books. Actually a hero of conservatives, Republican President Teddy Roosevelt was a fine "trust buster" and dissolved 40 monopoly corporations (according to the wiki article).

      Did you even read the /. summary?

      Unlike most /.ers, perhaps you're one, I not only read summaries I actually read the articles linked to. Did you read the article?

      Falcon

  160. PayPal is useless by RandySC · · Score: 1

    My last complaint to PayPal support a week ago:

    I still get a message that says
    "Security Measures

        We are currently performing regular maintenance of our security measures. Your account has been randomly selected for this maintenance, and you will now be taken through a series of identity verification
    pages."

        It then asks for a certain credit card number that I have in my hand at
    the moment ending in XX##. After entering it then takes me to an error page that says Sorry- your last action could not be completed.

        I don't see how this is random if I get it every time. The fact that I cannot proceed means that this is a problem with the Paypal website and you need to elevate my complaint to a higher level of support who can check your logs and see why I ended up at a dead end.

    Their response:
    Thank you for contacting PayPal.

    Hello my name is Sarah Marie, I am sorry to hear about the situation regarding the problems you encounter when logging in to your account,
    and understand your frustration and concern over this issue. I am happy to assist you with your questions.

    In viewing the email that you sent to us, in as much as I would really want to assist you, I have limited resources to determine a resolution
    since I would need additional information. I suggest that you contact us again with more information about your concern so that we may assist you accordingly. You may also contact our Customer Service agents at 1-xxxxxx / our toll free number 1-888-xxxxx. We would be more
    than happy to help you. I would like to apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

    In some of my past complaints, I even included the URL for the PageNotFound as it had this long hex looking part and suggested they examine their logs. I have given them all the info they need to fix this, and now they think a phone call will connect me to an agent who can support a website bug?

    I am at the point where I just don't want to bother with them.

    --
    Organization: alphabetical, sometimes numerical or messy
  161. Check Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Item terrible. Unsightly packaging. Delivery was ever so late. Have never bought from anyone so obnoxious. Disgusted. F-!
    Immensely intimidating quality! Quality of the wrapping was shocking. Delivery was very, very sluggish. Ever so angry. E-
    The item was detestable and bad. Immensely sluggish delivery. The packaging was exceptionally foul. Seller is shoddy. F-!
    The item was abhorrent and terrible. The packaging was immensely unprepossessing. Remarkably slow dispatch. Disgusted. D-
    Item was of the most shameful quality. Packaging was odious. Late delivery. Have never bought from anyone so hideous. F-!
    The item was shameful! Packaging was daunting. Sluggish delivery. Have never bought from anyone so horrid. Disgusted. F-!
    The item was terrible and rotten. Packaging was horrible. Remarkably slow dispatch. Seller is dismaying and loathsome. F-
    Item was of the most beastly quality. Contemptible packaging. Very, very shocking delivery. Would not buy from again. F-!
    Item was of the most gruesome quality! Packaging was offensive. Exceptionally frightening delivery. Seller is heinous. F-
    Quality of item was horrific. Exceptionally loathsome delivery. Piggish packaging. Seller is terrible and detestable. F-!

  162. Re:So long USPO Money Order, the best option to pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can truly get scammed!

    Previously, the best way to pay was with a US Post Office money order.

    What you would do is write a description of the item that you had purchased, and if you didn't get it, the seller had committed mail fraud.

    The reason this was the best, is that they (the post office)have a whole division dedicated to mail fraud, and would actually work at tracking down fraudsters and shutting down their operations, as the laws on mail fraud have teeth, as opposed to something that belongs in small claims court otherwise.

    Other payment methods (Visa, MC, PayPal) isn't going to spend a whole lot of effort to recover minor amounts of money, they may refund your money, but the scammer gets to continue their operation, maybe with a minor name change, taking advantage of the next sucker to come along.

    This goes back to the reason why you don't really want to hack government entities, is that they will spend a fortune on tracking down the perpetrator all out of disproportion to the actual damage caused. *

    In fact, a good way to tell the legitimacy of the seller, especially if they were a "private" seller, is to see if they would accept a USPO money order.

    If they didn't it was a red flag that you may not want to deal with them.

    I can understand (from a purely greed standpoint) of EBay not wanting to allow this type of transaction, as they don't get even more of a cut of the PayPal action, and just have to make due with the listing fee.

    Oh well, just another nail in the coffin for fiscal responsibility.

    I don't acept money order. Who want trouble to wait for money order to arrive and then drive to somewhere to cash it?

    Check, money order are just too slow to me. I only accept Paypal. Come on, 1.9%, not a big deal for me.