Slashdot Mirror


Urine Passes NASA Taste Test

Ponca City, We love you writes "Astronauts flying aboard space shuttle Endeavour are delivering a device to the International Space Station that may leave you wondering if NASA is taking recycling too far. Among the ship's cargo is a water regeneration system that distills, filters, ionizes, and oxidizes wastewater — including urine — into fresh water for drinking or, as one astronaut puts it, 'will make yesterday's coffee into today's coffee.' The US space agency spent $250M for the water recycling equipment but with the space shuttles due to retire in two years, NASA needed to make sure the station crew would have a good supply of fresh water. The Environmental Control and Life Support Systems uses a purification process called vapor compression distillation: urine is boiled until the water in it turns to steam. In space, there's an additional challenge: steam doesn't rise, so the entire distillation system is spun to create artificial gravity to separate the steam from the brine. The water has been thoroughly tested on Earth, including blind taste tests that pitted recycled urine with similarly treated tap water. 'Some people may think it's downright disgusting, but if it's done correctly, you process water that's purer than what you drink here on Earth,' said Endeavour astronaut Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper."

404 comments

  1. Neat by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

    However, I don't think anybody wants to drink this warm, so better make that piss frosty.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Neat by siddesu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not many grown ups on this site, obviously.

    2. Re:Neat by narcberry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some of us can't throw away $250M on something like this, we're forced to drink ours le naturale.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    3. Re:Neat by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Hi! You must be new here!

    4. Re:Neat by Scutter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some of us can't throw away $250M on something like this, we're forced to drink ours le naturale.

      Yeah, but here you pay a buck per can and call it "Budweiser".

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    5. Re:Neat by antgly · · Score: 1

      It's frothy.

    6. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The dupes here on Slashdot don't get it that the entire planet is a closed system too. Let them have their Xboxes; when the time comes we'll use them for soylent green. Mmmmm, soylent green...

    7. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm, soylent green...

      Now with more girls!

    8. Re:Neat by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 1

      Who pissed in your Post Toasties?

    9. Re:Neat by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's not just this site. the maturity level implied by the summary/article bodes poorly for the human race.

      it's called the water cycle. any water you consume, no matter where it's from, has been recycled through natural ecological/biochemical processes. in fact every molecule that makes up your body has been "recycled" in countless ways.

      there's nothing gross or unsanitary about recycling the waster from urine through proper distillation. there is absolutely no difference between drinking water distilled from urine and water distilled from rain water or river water. that kind of irrational thinking is the reason why people will spend 10x the money to buy name brand drugs rather than the chemically & pharmacologically identical generics.

      you should be more grossed out by keeping your toothbrush within 20 ft of your toilet (as most people seem to do) since studies have shown that fecal bacteria can be sprayed up to 20 ft from the toilet each time the toilet is flushed.

    10. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, pretty disgusting. That's why I never flush my toilet.

    11. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lets not forget all those happy critters in the river can't exactly jump out to take a wizz.

    12. Re:Neat by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean InBev?

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    13. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some asswipe modded this guy a Troll? Dubya Tee Eff!?!?!?

    14. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should be more grossed out by keeping your toothbrush within 20 ft of your toilet (as most people seem to do) since studies have shown that fecal bacteria can be sprayed up to 20 ft from the toilet each time the toilet is flushed.

      Not if you put the lid down THEN flush.

    15. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you are newer than he is.

      Now GTFO my /. -- both of you.

    16. Re:Neat by JoeGee · · Score: 1

      Exactly so. NASA is simply speeding up the process.

      Talking about unusual contaminants, in my home town we had a particularly disturbing incident a few years ago at our local reservoir. A fisherman drowned. No body turned up. A month later divers found him, stuck in the city water intake ... For a month we had been drinking the most interesting "tea." Three days later they reported his body found washed up on shore. It sounded better in the newspaper.

      Once the water has been filtered and treated, its source no longer matters.

      -Joe

      P.S. What if my toothbrush is shut in the medicine cabinet?

      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
    17. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soylent green - the only way most slashdotters will ever taste a woman.

    18. Re:Neat by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      You mean Bud's weiner......

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    19. Re:Neat by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why don't they just make still-suits?

      They worked just fine on Dune.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Neat by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mythbusters looked at the toothbrush / fecal bacteria thing and found bacteria on a toothbrush kept in the kitchen. That stuff gets everywhere.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    21. Re:Neat by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Informative

      You jest, but in some countries like China or Mexico, the excrement-ridden toilet paper isn't flushed. It's simply tossed into the wastebasket. It's one of those foreign things that's hard to take at first sight, much like public sale of dogs for human-food.

      I was introduced to the T.P. phenomenon after a Mexican buddy visited my home. I'd been to Mexico many times but I didn't know not to flush because I never took shits there and I was usually so drunk that I never bothered to look in the trash bins. Seeing that ugly brown clump in my wastebasket was enough to ban him from my apartment for a good 2 months before I learned the truth from a few more buddies at home and abroad. Ahh, Western ignorance! :D

    22. Re:Neat by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny you mention that. In a news segment on Canadian TV last year, there was a major deal between breweries being worked on.

      So, a few reporters decided to ask local beer drinkers in pubs if the beer of either company was worthwhile. The answer 100% of the time: "I don't drink either - it upsets my stomach. Only imports!"

      So maybe this association to the NAStronauts waste recycling program has some truth.

    23. Re:Neat by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      Some of us can't throw away $250M on something like this, we're forced to drink ours le naturale.

      Yeah, but here you pay a buck per can and call it "Budweiser".


      Oh, man. What's that make Natural Light? I shudder to think of it........

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    24. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people will spend 10x the money to buy name brand drugs rather than the chemically & pharmacologically identical generics

      They are NOT always chemically and pharmacologically identical. Especially the generics from Teva Pharmaceuticals, which is a particularly evil company. Gee, I wonder why that company isn't more regulated. You get three guesses as to where they are based, and the first two don't count. So, your argument holds no... WATER!

              http://www.consumerlab.com/reviews/Wellbutrin_vs_Generic_Bupropion/Wellbutrin/

    25. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of you guys probably might have already tasted recycled water... Britain, Belgium, Singapore, Los Angeles and Orange County in California.

      http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24591040-7583,00.html

    26. Re:Neat by lysergic.acid · · Score: 0

      um, that's like saying that because occasionally shady companies break FDA regulations that you should grow your own food. the reasn that the consumer lab report is news is because this is not supposed to happen, and indeed it doesn't happen very often.

      what is the difference between 10mg of fluoxetine manufactured by one company versus 10mg manufactured by another? if they're both the same chemical compound, they will have the same pharmacological effect on your body. your body doesn't discriminate between name brands and generics.

    27. Re:Neat by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 1

      Every drop of water you have EVER drank has at one point, been pissed out by a dinosaur.

      Drink up!

    28. Re:Neat by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to have sewage reclamation plants in California as one of my clients. They take fresh sewage, separate it, clean it, and turn it back around as drinking water. It happens all the time.

      However, the toothbrush myth was debunked on Mythbusters. Toothbrushes kept closer to the toilet did not contain more bacteria. However, they did show that toothbrushes all over the place, even kept outside the bathroom (in the middle of the lab) had bacteria. They pretty much all had the same levels of bacteria.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    29. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know that all of these locations actually use recycled water for drinking water -- reclaimed water in many cities is labeled separately and in some cases can only be used for irrigation.

      (I used to live in Santee, CA, where part of the water reclamation system is also a city park used for boating and fishing -- my high school used reclaimed water for irrigation, and all of the pipes and associated taps for that water had to be colored light purple to distinguish them from the rest of the water system.)

      Also, I believe the proposal in L.A. has been to introduce reclaimed water in a reservoir augmentation plan -- the reclaimed water gets added to the reservoir, where it is mixed with additional fresh water and filtered again before going out into the rest of the system.

    30. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seeing that ugly brown clump in my wastebasket was enough to ban him from my apartment for a good 2 months before I learned the truth from a few more buddies at home and abroad.

      Holy fricken' easter egg surprise batman!... You're very forgiving to only ban him for 2 months.
      What's this "truth" you're talking about? Foreigners not following local customs and doing grotesque things, is okay?
      When in Rome, do as the Romans do - unless they do it in a basket, then all bets are off.

    31. Re:Neat by multisync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup. Most computer keyboards have more fecal coliform on them than most toilet seats.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    32. Re:Neat by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      Urine Passes NASA Taste Test Taste NASA Pass Urine Test Urine Test Passes NASA Taste NASA Urine Passes Taste Test NASA Tastes Passed Urine Test stealing from what I read on some column about this urine dispenser: Like Heidi Klum always says "One day urine, the next day urout."

    33. Re:Neat by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Some of you guys probably might have already tasted recycled water... Britain, Belgium, Singapore, Los Angeles and Orange County in California.

      http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24591040-7583,00.html

      So true.
      There was even a problem with it in Britain : because so many people there take prozac , and it ends up in the urine , and isn't filtered out , thus resulting in people getting prozac in their drinking water.

    34. Re:Neat by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      stupid br tag! The above comment was meant be funny.
      Here's a repost (I know it's dead, but let me beat my own dead horse thankyouverymuch):

      Urine Passes NASA Taste Test
      Taste NASA Pass Urine Test
      Urine Test Passes NASA Taste
      NASA Urine Passes Taste Test
      NASA Tastes Passed Urine Test

      stealing from what I read on some column about this urine dispenser: Like Heidi Klum always says "One day urine, the next day urout."

      ..oh shut up.

    35. Re:Neat by cyn1c77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mythbusters looked at the toothbrush / fecal bacteria thing and found bacteria on a toothbrush kept in the kitchen. That stuff gets everywhere.

      That's not from the toilet flushing, that's because you left me alone with your toothbrush for 5 minutes.

      I can't help it, when I have an itch, I HAVE to scratch it!

    36. Re:Neat by marafa · · Score: 0

      gives a whole new meaning to "eau de toilette"

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    37. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw that episode, and am curious. Would it not be probable that the bacteria was deposited onto the tooth brushes from their mouths? The mouth is after all the beginning of the alimentary canal with the anus being the end. It seems likely to me that bacteria could travel in a retrograde fashion.

    38. Re:Neat by vistic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know H and O don't stay inseparably linked for all eternity once they join up as H2O, right?

      It's a dynamic, complex chemistry-filled world.

    39. Re:Neat by Paltin · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are more molecules of water in a cup then there are cups of water on the Earth.

      So, statistically speaking, we've all eaten Jesus. Ironic that it doesn't take Christian magic to make that happen. Also makes you wonder about whether you need Catholic Priest for transubstantiation ("No thanks father, I brought my own Jesus to eat").

    40. Re:Neat by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Oh, hell, is Mexico part of the East now?

    41. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, pretty disgusting. That's why I always close the lid before flushing.

    42. Re:Neat by gacl · · Score: 1
      Reminds me a song called Mi Aguita Amarilla (Mi Yellow Water) by a Spanish group called Los Toreros Muertos. It relates the travels of the singer's urine around the world:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTq1i1SdH3o

    43. Re:Neat by idigitallDotCom · · Score: 1

      That's always interested me.... Does that also mean that, technically speaking, the (approx) 70% of our body water mass is actually recycled dinosaur piss? Also, that's why you geeks are always confused for women - cos you drop the toilet lid before you flush.

      --
      blog.idigitall.com
    44. Re:Neat by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I don't think +5 is enough for this. Can we change to mod system to allow +10?

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    45. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you let him drop dookies in your waste basket again?

    46. Re:Neat by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      er - did they examine the mouths of the toothbrush users ?

      the term " speaker of shit " might yet be correct . :D

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    47. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, that isn't actually a case of western ignorance. If anything, it's a case of ignorance on the part of your friend; he was the one visiting YOU, and he is the one who should have known that that sort of thing isn't acceptable where you live.

      Besides, would it have made a difference if you had known this is common where he's from? I don't know about you, but I would still have found it disgusting, and still would've banned him from my place (possibly after giving precisely ONE warning to never do that again).

    48. Re:Neat by famebait · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't know about you,

      Dude, he just told you.

      I [...] still would've banned him from my place (possibly after giving precisely ONE warning to never do that again).

      Wow, you sound like a really generous person. I'm sure you have lots of friends to ban.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    49. Re:Neat by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Are you for real??

      Why are they even taking something that is on the same level as cocain, heroine and lsd? Or are all of them junkies? (Well they are either way. Either you are taking prozac and a junkie. Or you've never taken it.)

      Oh, and prozac in my drinking water is enough for me to sue them (the drug companies, the city council, the doctors and the "patients") to hell and back for attempted murder.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    50. Re:Neat by Die+The+Villian · · Score: 1

      I for one volunteer to allow any one to drink my urine... Filtered or otherwise.

    51. Re:Neat by polar+bear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm British, and the first time I came across this "no flush" was actually in ... Newport, Rhode Island! Apparently the hotel and local plumbing couldn't cope with the paper.

      N.

    52. Re:Neat by Syberz · · Score: 1

      NASA paid $250M for this??? I'm pretty sure the piss filtering contraption Kevin Costner used in Waterworld could have be bought and adapter for far less!

      NASA is wasted ressources on turning waste into ressources...

      --
      ~Syberz
    53. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Most computer keyboards have more fecal coliform on them than most toilet seats.

      Replying to you has somehow left me feeling more dirty than usual.

    54. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm..... Tang!

      It's what the Astronauts drink!

    55. Re:Neat by JamesP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People do that because the hydraulic system (is not as good as in the US/etc and) gets clogged if you do that.

      For people who are used to it, it's no biggie. Yeah, I know, "excrement ridden", sounds gross, but it's only a matter of taking it, closing the bag and disposing it.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    56. Re:Neat by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      For many people, prozac in drinking water is considered a good thing.

    57. Re:Neat by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      Mythbusters to the rescue! haha, I knew I remembered them doing an episode on this. Basically, no matter where you put your toothbrush, it's going to get the same bacteria on it.

      http://mythbustersresults.com/episode12

      Fecal coliforms bacteria can grow in toothbrush bristles.
      confirmed
      Fecal coliforms were indeed found on all the test brushes, including the control ones. However, none were of a level high enough to be dangerous, and experts confirm that such coliforms were impossible to completely avoid.

    58. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are called pinworms, and are VERY VERY contagious. Go get some medicine to kill them and shit them out. Yes Johnny, they come out of you butt when you sleep to lay eggs, then when you wake up they crawl back up your ass.

    59. Re:Neat by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Well, the water you're drinking was probably dinosaur piss at one point. Or maybe some prehistoric mastodon. Or even Ugh the Caveman.

      The water just keeps going round-and-round-and-round being used over-and-over.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    60. Re:Neat by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      you should be more grossed out by keeping your toothbrush within 20 ft of your toilet (as most people seem to do) since studies have shown that fecal bacteria can be sprayed up to 20 ft from the toilet each time the toilet is flushed.

      THIS is why I close my toilet lid before flushing. Guests however often fail to do this. Kinda gross...

    61. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I have to ask. What's so bad about faecal bacteria anyway ?

      After all it's come out of one end of you so it can't be that toxic or your ass would fall off.

    62. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the plumbing is sub standard in those countries. flushing your toilet paper would quickly lead to a clogged sewer and instead of poop in your basket, you'd have liquid waste flooding your house.

    63. Re:Neat by Hankenstein · · Score: 1

          I live in Colorado, what the hell do you think everybody in Phoenix is drinking except my (hopefully well)filtered
      excrement?

    64. Re:Neat by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      If it's so ubiquitous, why is anyone worried about it? Clearly our immune systems are perfectly capable of dealing with it, and if we can't see it or taste it, who cares if it's there? Sterilising everything would fairly plainly be a stupid move, we know we're constantly exposed to countless bugs and bacteria, but hey, we're designed for that, it's what white blood cells are for.

      I have to wonder whether asthma and allergies and other autoimmune problems are (at least in part) the result of everything being so much cleaner now than the past - our immune systems get bored, then freak out over a bag of peanuts, some cat hair or a few specks of pollen, just for something to do.

    65. Re:Neat by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The solution to that is simple. Just put the lid down before you flush.

    66. Re:Neat by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      You jest, but in some countries like China or Mexico, the excrement-ridden toilet paper isn't flushed. It's simply tossed into the wastebasket. It's one of those foreign things that's hard to take at first sight, much like public sale of dogs for human-food.

      In college, there was a dorm room next to mine with three foreign guys in it. Two were from Singapore, and the third was from a different country that I can't recall. The third guy practiced this habit and the two Singapore guys were about to strangle him over it.

    67. Re:Neat by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      It has be hypothized the same thing could happen with hormonal contraceptives, ultimately causing infertility and thus the extinction of the human race.

      It could be another pseudo-scientific rumor though... I didn't investigate.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    68. Re:Neat by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's one thing that always bugs me - the irrational fear that things are covered with bacteria.

      I got news for you - everything is always coated with bacteria, unless it just came out of an autoclave, in which case it is coated with dead bacteria. This is why we have immune systems and why those without immune systems will die almost immediately.

      Are you worried about fecal matter on your toothbrush from "splashing" from flushing? Try worrying about shit up your nose every time you smell a fart. Try thinking about all the bacteria stuck to those plastic menu covers in restaurants and how everybody handles them, then reaches for the bowl of tortilla chips.

      Certainly, good hygiene can help keep the bacterial loads to a minimum, which is a good idea. Just don't overdue it and freak out.

      Oh, and urine - that's one of the cleanest bodily fluids around. Unless you have an infection, urine is sterile and safe to drink. Disgusting, yes, and not a very healthy drink (lots of salts and things your body is trying to get rid off), but safe from an infectious disease standpoint.

    69. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might, if you think it does.

      Wonder if anyone has ever researched if placebo effect boosts the efficiency of drugs thought to be "better" somehow.

    70. Re:Neat by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I find it more difficult to deal with people from far-away places who perform dive bombing from high altitude, standing on the seat and more-or-less dropping the payload into the toilet.

      Ignorance is no excuse -- in matters like these, it's rather important that you learn what the customs of the country are. Else you're no better than an American that waltzes into a Japanese bathroom wearing his outdoor shoes.

    71. Re:Neat by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the ignorance was on your side. Fecal matter in the trash can?

    72. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you watched Mythbusters Episode 12 you would know 20 feet means nothing. They found fecal coliform on toothbrushes placed all over the building. So you might as well have it where it is convenient

    73. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um - Sorry for intruding but you are wrong on the name brand drug thing.

      I have a friend that actually has to take some fairly strong meds that require him to get to within an nth degree of the dosage or he will start having seizures, if they are too strong he can't function - he sits in a chair all day and looks at the pretty light reflections in the window or he's near the toilet vomitting. If it's too weak - seizures. He attempted to take generics of this particular drug and started doing a little of each of the above scenarios, well after studying his blood on the generics for more than a month the doctors found that the generics weren't precise enough in the dosage. Which can be ok in some situations but unfortunately not this one...

    74. Re:Neat by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Not many grown ups on this site, obviously.

      You are in the wrong site, obviously

      --
      -- dnl
    75. Re:Neat by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      You do that when your toilet is not good enough to gulp the toiled paper and clogs every time

      --
      -- dnl
    76. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditional sceptic tank systems cannot take regular toilet paper, that's where that comes from.

      Nowadays this is less of an issue since people tend to buy sceptic-tank compatible toilet paper or simply make the sceptic tank big enough to handle the longer decomposition time of paper.

    77. Re:Neat by tenco · · Score: 1

      and if we can't see it or taste it, who cares if it's there?

      X-Rays FTW!

    78. Re:Neat by Hucko · · Score: 1

      and radiation -- people (mostly using mobiles types) are irrational about radiation

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    79. Re:Neat by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      I meant in the case of shit-bacteria (if we don't notice it on stuff and it has no ill effects, what's the fuss), not the world at large. You know that.

      Besides, a better example would have been air - can't see it or taste it, but we'd sure as hell notice if it went away.

    80. Re:Neat by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      You jest, but in some countries like China or Mexico, the excrement-ridden toilet paper isn't flushed. It's simply tossed into the wastebasket. It's one of those foreign things that's hard to take at first sight, much like public sale of dogs for human-food.

      I invite you to take a tour of the public facilities in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana. In the smaller c-stores, you'll often find a wastebasket next to the toilet, even if the plumbing is otherwise up to first-world standards. I can only assume it's because, if they didn't have a waste bin, the visitors would simply toss the wads on the floor.

      And before anyone mentions the proximity of these states to the Rio Grande... I know for a fact that this habit is also indigenous to Americans who can trace their heritage back to the lily-whitest Europeans. Don't ask me how I found out... I just know, k? *shudder*

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    81. Re:Neat by BBTHEMAN · · Score: 1

      For some reason my son never flushes the toilets either, I get a present in every toilet daily.

    82. Re:Neat by severoon · · Score: 1

      That toothbrush thing is a lie. It's been discounted both by Cecil Adams Mythbusters. If ever there was an Appeal to Authority that isn't a fallacy, that's it!

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    83. Re:Neat by severoon · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's not like he stuck his used paper to the wall like your friends did your place in college after a night of hearty drinking...

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    84. Re:Neat by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      No, it's for the cigarette butts, pocket litter, tampons, paper towels, soap wrappers, etc., etc., that people otherwise try to flush down the toilet and clog it.

    85. Re:Neat by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      If only. Oh, if only.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  2. And for this bright idea... by kylemonger · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... they paid two hundred and fifty million dollars?!

    1. Re:And for this bright idea... by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dont mind him, he's just takin' the piss.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:And for this bright idea... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they paid two hundred and fifty million dollars to get it to work. In space. Without taking up to much space or energy in the space station. (Where both are at a premium.)

      And this is essential technology if we are ever going to leave the Earth-Moon system. Shipping enough water for a manned trip to even the nearest planet is simply prohibitive, in weight, volume, and cost. So long-term it's a good investment. (If you think we should invest in space at all, of course...)

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re: And for this bright idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I strongly suspect the $250M price tag includes the cost of installation. At around $500M per trip the shipping costs are astronomical!

    4. Re:And for this bright idea... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These are a good investment even without interplanetary missions. One of the features of Frank Herbert's novel Dune that I always thought fascinating was the stillsuit, where a person's waste water, whether urine, tears, or sweat, could be recycled with extreme efficiency. If you work in the desert, wouldn't it be nice to have one of these for emergencies?

    5. Re:And for this bright idea... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gee whiz, that was a bad joke.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:And for this bright idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sure. On the other hand, we sweat because the heat of vaporisation helps cool the body by taking heat away as the sweat evaporates. So how are the fremen dumping heat so that they don't die of heatstroke? In the movie, the suits were black to suck up even more solar rays!

      Now sure, it gets pretty cold at night so if they had something with an amazingly high specific heat that they could use as a thermodynamic sink, that might work to average the day and night temperatures. But that would also be bloody heavy and not remotely man portable.

    7. Re:And for this bright idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the use aboard submarines.

    8. Re:And for this bright idea... by anilg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree. It was in bad taste.

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
    9. Re:And for this bright idea... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the movie, the suits were black to suck up even more solar rays

      Which was stupid. The book clearly states the Fremen wearing light robes over the stillsuit, for better camouflage, and, yes, keeping cool.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    10. Re:And for this bright idea... by NuclearError · · Score: 1

      Man, the humor is piss poor here.

      --
      Nuclear engineers build weapons. Civil engineers build targets.
    11. Re:And for this bright idea... by clockwise_music · · Score: 1

      I can see it now. In a pamphlet from 2150:

      "Getting bored with atmosphere? Sick of air? Tired of nature? Come work on the Moon! New job opportunities! 0.4 gravity so you won't feel as fat! Lots of fresh(er) water!"

    12. Re:And for this bright idea... by sam0737 · · Score: 1

      Not just space. Potentially we could backport this technology back to the ground, to rural area or desert or whatever hazard area where clean water is also a premium.

      This is actually a very good example that how investment in space technology can payoff and directly affect our daily life.

    13. Re:And for this bright idea... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      In 2150 the moon can advertise its population of lesbian moon babes.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:And for this bright idea... by firefarter · · Score: 1

      Yep, all waste fluids and, er... solids... were processed - except for the tears. For the Fremen crying was the ultimate show of emotion, because you sacrificed the water.

      But on the whole - the concept of the stillsuit is surprisingly well thought out. Osmosis filter, boot-activated pumps. Just that thing with the er... solids annoys me a bit, Herbert skimped a bit on the detail there.

    15. Re:And for this bright idea... by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      These puns are pissing me off. You blokes don't have a pot to piss in for humor. Urinalot of trouble if I have anything to say about it.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    16. Re:And for this bright idea... by vyruss000 · · Score: 1

      Stop pissing about and get to the point...

    17. Re:And for this bright idea... by paul248 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure we already know how to distill water in the presence of gravity. It's just a question of how much energy you're willing to consume.

    18. Re:And for this bright idea... by weber · · Score: 1

      Yes, they even recycled the blood from the dead.

    19. Re:And for this bright idea... by Die+The+Villian · · Score: 1

      Urine Trouble for that one

    20. Re:And for this bright idea... by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      And here i thought they paid $250M for the first person to taste test it

    21. Re:And for this bright idea... by nasch · · Score: 1

      a person's waste water, whether urine, tears, or sweat

      Fremen don't cry. ;-)

    22. Re:And for this bright idea... by nasch · · Score: 1

      Isn't that 0.1666... gravity (1/6)?

    23. Re:And for this bright idea... by bpkiwi · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately he also skimped on the fundamentals of heat transfer. As we get hot, we perspire. This thin film of liquid absorbs heat from the skin and air and turns to vapour, transferring that heat away from us.

      In a stillsuit, where does that heat go? If perspiration is allowed to evaporate, the suit has to somehow cool the resulting vapour to reclaim the water. If the perspiration is not allowed to evaporate then the skin is not cooled, so you need to apply some other cooling method.

    24. Re:And for this bright idea... by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      I thought it was pretty funny. In fact, it's number one in my book.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  3. Frosty piss? by renegadesx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Am I the only person who this jumped to mind when when I RTFA?

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
    1. Re:Frosty piss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think so. Some of us were thinking of water sports.

  4. Never again... by commlinx · · Score: 0

    Will I take the steam off my piss for granted.

  5. HOWEVER by FunkyRider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you process water that's purer than what you drink here on Earth. - It might be the case physically/chemically, but not psychologically.... "Look, I'm drinking purified pee and it's tasty!" God...

    --
    just wonder why there are so many anonymous cowards in this world....
    1. Re:HOWEVER by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Sometimes when I'm thirsty, and REALLY don't want to leave the computer in my Mom's basement - I drink urine.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:HOWEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be marketed to consumers on earth as "Lemon Tang," along with a newly formulated (ahem) "Space Food Sticks."

    3. Re:HOWEVER by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From your high userid I can identify you as a noob. For future reference, these types of comments are best posted ANONYMOUSLY. God help you if anyone knows your real name. I foresee a future employer doing a google search on your various aliases and THAT comment turning up.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:HOWEVER by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      From your high userid

      Dude, UIDs are up to the 1.4M range now. I don't think you can call his "high" when it falls into the bottom 50%.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:HOWEVER by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      So what do you think that the water your drinking is? Yep, more than likely its been pee a few times over, along with being dinosaur spit, and a whole lot of other things. Its called the water cycle.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    6. Re:HOWEVER by maxume · · Score: 1

      Nothing over 10,000 is anywhere near low. By the process of elimination, they must all be high.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:HOWEVER by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I foresee a future employer doing a google search on your various aliases

      Why tell them? Personally I don't think people should and various idiocy like people getting fired for their facebook photos (eg. the "drunken pirate" schoolteacher) highlight this.

      As for the new here remember there were thousands of people looking at this site on day 1, many of which cowered anonymously for ages or later lost passwords (doh!) or both. While you can tell someone with a low id was here for ages it's hard to tell with a high id.

    8. Re:HOWEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, an employer is going to know about his slashdot userid? what are you smoking and can I have some?

    9. Re:HOWEVER by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      see, I never did get squeamish eaters. Smell it, taste it, you like it, eat it. I made my point and now open the doors to further comments. Please use creative license, and don't disappoint me!

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    10. Re:HOWEVER by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I foresee a future employer doing a google search on your various aliases and THAT comment turning up.

      It'd be SOOOO worth it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:HOWEVER by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm in the creamy middle.

      I think I've been doing this for at least 10 years... not sure I'm still a newb except to the old and crusty, though :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:HOWEVER by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Why would he ever acknowledge any of his online identities.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    13. Re:HOWEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these types of comments are best posted ANONYMOUSLY. God help you if anyone knows your real name. I foresee a future employer doing a google search on your various aliases and THAT comment turning up.

      Yeah, because one would always include such aliases as "MightyYar" on a resume. :-P

    14. Re:HOWEVER by themacks · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that by this point all of earth's water has been in and come out of some living creature as waste. Sorry if that causes you a psychological breakdown.

      --
      i read about it in a blog once
    15. Re:HOWEVER by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      you process water that's purer than what you drink here on Earth. - It might be the case physically/chemically, but not psychologically.... "Look, I'm drinking purified pee and it's tasty!" God...

      Not that we aren't drinking recycled pee the natural way already.

      There's no deep sub surface container with the pee of past generations of humans and animals. ;)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    16. Re:HOWEVER by irae · · Score: 1

      Where is -1 disgusting?

    17. Re:HOWEVER by weber · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Wow, what a dedicated employee! No bathroom breaks, just sitting working endlessly at his computer with at tube from his pants to this mouth."

    18. Re:HOWEVER by harry666t · · Score: 1

      ...and Earth's water supplies are what, unlimited? Better get used to the thought that what you eat/drink/are has been something else before.

    19. Re:HOWEVER by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Nothing over 10,000 is anywhere near low.

      Guess you haven't dealt with government budgets...

      Or Windows bugs...

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    20. Re:HOWEVER by maxume · · Score: 1

      I deal in context.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    21. Re:HOWEVER by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      When you're an astronaut you have to get over your silly psychological hangups. Drinking distilled water that happened to come from urine is the least of your "ew gross!" moments. Besides, what do you think you're drinking now?

    22. Re:HOWEVER by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      Every drop of water on earth has been here for billions of years. What you drink today has been part of blood, oceans, urine, feces, vomit, plants, semen and anything else containing water.

    23. Re:HOWEVER by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      MEMO: Every new employee will be provided with his own Brita. Please clearly label your name on it.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  6. Wake me when they're really cheap and fast by h4x354x0r · · Score: 1

    because it would be a big step forward for worldwide water sanitation.

    --
    They were right - the revolution did not get televised. It was posted on YouTube instead. All in 120 characters. SLOOSH!
    1. Re:Wake me when they're really cheap and fast by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      Wired did an article on this tech in August of 2005, and the estimate was that it sanitized water at a rate of 5 gallons per minute for 3 cents per gallon.

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.08/urine.html

      Likewise NASA funded this because they spent $60 million over 5 years sending fresh water into space at a cost of $40,000 per gallon. It should cut the volume of water sent to the ISS by two thirds.

      I have been waiting for them to finally deploy this tech, and IIRC this predated Dean Kamen's water filtering system as well.

  7. In space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...no one can hear you steam. Your piss.

    Space is a horrible place.

  8. Woo! by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 1

    This means the home version is only a few years down the road!

    1. Re:Woo! by Surt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, the home version is a few miles down the road, typically.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, I work at a water management facility. The bathrooms are very far away from the work stations, some sort of bogus health regulation about how you can't have the unfiltered water too close to the bathrooms.

      Well, as most regulations do these days, it's done the opposite of its intent. The bathrooms are so far, peeing is just easier done in your water supply.

  9. More like "not far enough" by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh yeah, funny, astronaut pee. But for crying out loud (and losing valuable water in the process), what is so hard to understand about a closed system?

    "Going too far" is spending millions of dollars to send precious DHMO to the space station, when there are perfectly good pre-assembled dihydrogen monoxide molecules being blown out into the vacuum.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:More like "not far enough" by compro01 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      what is so hard to understand about a closed system?

      1. Getting it to work properly in microgravity.

      2. Doing so without taking up very much space or power, as both are in short supply on the ISS.

      3. Getting it to work reliably, as it would be decidedly bad for this kind of thing to break down halfway to Mars.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:More like "not far enough" by Kamokazi · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Joke-----> ~~~~*

      Your head-> O

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    3. Re:More like "not far enough" by Halow8888 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the DHMO they're smuggling in their bodies when they leave orbit! For shame. They should be forced to drink pee steam!

    4. Re:More like "not far enough" by Cousarr · · Score: 1

      what is so hard to understand about a closed system

      Exactly, keep that DHMO and you don't exactly go any where. Better ship some up to be on the safe side.

    5. Re:More like "not far enough" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, we already live in a closed system when it comes to water. It's just a really big closed system. And who's to say that the water from your "pure" aquafier source wasn't some alien's pee in a previous universe?

    6. Re:More like "not far enough" by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I have a tendency to duck when I notice an unknown object flying towards my head.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:More like "not far enough" by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      If you had taken basic high school chemistry you would have recognized it.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  10. Childish by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's bad enough that the mainstream media has been acting like a bunch of prepubescent children over the urine recycling, but now Slashdot has to get into the game as well?

    "that may leave you wondering if NASA is taking recycling too far"

    Uh, nope, it doesn't leave me wondering that at all. In fact, when I first read about it I was rather surprised that the ISS wasn't recycling urine already. Any manned moon-base, or long-duration trip to reach Mars, would absolutely require the recycling of urine.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Childish by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

      People are too far from their food. If people are upset over urine, what would they think of all of the solid waste that ends up as fertilizer?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Childish by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Not to mention what gets mixed into their beef after it's picked up off the slaughterhouse floor...

    3. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I grew up in Ohio, in a dead flat plane in the upper 25% of the state, the water treatment plant on one end of the town seemed to feed the creek through downtown which seemed to feed the reservoirs where the town's fresh water came from. Most communities not on a major water way probably are recycling with a drip through the ground step...

    4. Re:Childish by pi_rules · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, when I first read about it I was rather surprised that the ISS wasn't recycling urine already.

      Same here.

      Isn't it pretty much the safest source of drinking water? You only need something that can handle things that are already in the bodies of the astronauts. We can safely assume none of them have any nasty viruses in them, and I'm pretty sure we don't have bacteria in our own urine, so you're down to getting the sodium and urea out of it I guess.

    5. Re:Childish by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      NASA has been intentionally delaying the installation of a water recycling capability on the ISS. Without one, the ISS requires frequent trips from the Shuttle to replenish the water they dump overboard (which I consider borderline criminal.) The recycling capability has been on the books for years, and should have been one of the first modules installed. That is, of course, unless you don't really want the ISS to be self sufficient for any stretch of time.

    6. Re:Childish by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, when I first read about it I was rather surprised that the ISS wasn't recycling urine already.

      Same here.

      Isn't it pretty much the safest source of drinking water? You only need something that can handle things that are already in the bodies of the astronauts. We can safely assume none of them have any nasty viruses in them, and I'm pretty sure we don't have bacteria in our own urine, so you're down to getting the sodium and urea out of it I guess.

      This has been debated here in Australia in places where water is very scarce. One issue is with hormones and drugs which get into the urine and can find their way back into the food supply via a recycling system.

      Outside inputs to the food chain are heavily regulated on the ISS so I assume this aspect is taken care of.

    7. Re:Childish by trawg · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting comment, but without references it sort of sounds a bit conspiracy theory-esque. Do you have references to back this claim up?

    8. Re:Childish by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      It's bad enough that the mainstream media has been acting like a bunch of prepubescent children over the urine recycling, but now Slashdot has to get into the game as well?

      You must be new here.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    9. Re:Childish by ross.w · · Score: 1

      It isn't a problem if you use the right membrane system. After all, they can filter out Na+ and Cl- (salt) in a desalination plant. Viruses, drug molecules and hormones are all much bigger than that.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    10. Re:Childish by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some woman called Animal Control complaining that a bunch of us were letting our dogs pee at the park, where kids played. Guess she never really thought about where all the squirrels, rabbits, birds, rats, and other critters do their business.

    11. Re:Childish by lxs · · Score: 1

      "Any manned moon-base, or long-duration trip to reach Mars, would absolutely require the recycling of urine."

      They should just dig some latrines outside. Cheap and easy.

    12. Re:Childish by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      You can filter out salt with a membrane system?

    13. Re:Childish by Shivetya · · Score: 1

      Hey, I would not mind a story about the solid waste disposal system if they said "everything now tastes like chicken"

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    14. Re:Childish by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Can't you just let your dog piss somewhere where the kids don't play.

      Presumably you wouldn't want someone pissing against your computer desk?

    15. Re:Childish by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but my computer desk isn't outside of my home exposed to the elements and nature.

      If you're outside you run the risk of getting pooped on by birds (that just gave me a childhood flashback of that happening to my 3rd grade teacher once hehe) and every step you take has probably been peed on by an animal at some time or another. ESPECIALLY in parks. Heck, stray cats LOVE to use sand boxes as litter. That's why (smart) people with sand boxes in their back yard have covers for them.

      If this type of things really bothers you then a) you're an idiot and b) don't let your kids play outside.

      This also reminds me of one of the theories as to why children have more allergies and weaker immune systems these days. It's hypothesized that in days of old children would come in contact with various parasites and bacteria as they play outside and get all dirty which would help to train their immune systems. These days we're so uptight about hygiene and cleanliness. Kids play outside so much less and are cleaned at constant by their parents. Of course this is moot since urine is sterile. The soil and sand that the kids play in, on the other hand, is LOADED with bacteria.

    16. Re:Childish by Threni · · Score: 1

      Perhaps she knows about the disease which can cause blindness, which is spread via dog poo. I suppose you have trained your dog to only pee but not leave a deposit, but not all owners are so talented.

    17. Re:Childish by fprintf · · Score: 1

      With a properly designed and implemented leeching system, the water you get after traveling through several hundred feet of soil is about as pure as you are going to get. At least as far as viruses, bacteria and the things we typically worry about. I don't know about dissolved chemicals, but I will say the water we used to drink was from a well (in a large neighborhood filled with septic systems) tested as cleaner than the municipal supply. The only houses in town that ever had a problem were those that had shallow wells. Redrilling the well a little deeper solved the problem every time.

      Furthermore, in a reservoir system most of the water is not coming from the recycled stuff feeding back through the creek, but is instead being replenished by rainwater. And then you have the fact that any stuff coming back through the creek is likely diluted tremendously into the larger reservoir.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    18. Re:Childish by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      If this type of things really bothers you then [...]] b) don't let your kids play outside.

      Many people don't. And then they keep their house hygienically clean so that their kids' immune systems get a nice, easy ride...

    19. Re:Childish by thepotoo · · Score: 1

      That "hypothesis" has been pretty clearly shown to be the cause behind the polio epidemic in the early part of the 20th century.

      Also, don't forget that kid's share their mother's immune system for the first year or so of life.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    20. Re:Childish by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      Taste is not useful to determine water quality. Most waterborne illnesses can be carried in almost pure water, and many toxins are tasteless at low but harmful levels. Regular scientific testing is the only way to be sure of what you are drinking. This is why well water is practically always more dangerous than municipal water.

    21. Re:Childish by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Do you have a citation or experience that shows how well water is "practically always more dangerous" than municipal water? In my response I indicated how our well water was tested against the municipal supply, and it tested with lower levels of contaminants (though higher in minerals).

      The only "danger" I realistically see from well water, in the United States anyway, is the lack of fluoridation and the subsequent effect on children's teeth. I have more damage to my teeth from lack of fluoridation (despite brushing and flossing) while my wife has none of the same problems - she grew up in town with town water.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    22. Re:Childish by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Which is why I cook my meat. :)

    23. Re:Childish by sitkill · · Score: 1

      House, is that you? You're due in clinic in 10 minutes! Getta movin!

    24. Re:Childish by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Urine may be sterile, but that's not the point. For one it smells.

      So, your answer is you don't mind people pissing next to your desk because it's sterile and will boost your immune system (contradictory!)?

      Or perhaps it's using your front door as a toilet then ...?

      FWIW I don't believe in keeping a child in a sterile environment but I do believe in being civil towards my fellow man. And dog owners may not all be so foolish but most around here don't care if you get dog shit on your shoes, how hard is it to put your dog in the gutter to crap or to take it to a dog toilet ...

    25. Re:Childish by Veramocor · · Score: 1

      Reverse Osmosis membrane yes.

      Nanofiltration membranes can filter out divalent salts but not monovalent salts like NaCl (in general).

      --
      Veramocor
    26. Re:Childish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your answer is you don't mind people pissing next to your desk because it's sterile and will boost your immune system (contradictory!)?

      Since you're maintaining your ignorance, I'll spell it out. His answer is that it's normal for animals to pee at the park, and it's likewise normal for kids to play in the park where all sorts of animals have peed. It's not normal to pee on a computer desk, which one can expect few animals have soiled.

      But if you're still going to maintain your backwards sense of right/wrong and lack of understanding of "outdoors", consider this: your keyboard would probably end up cleaner if someone urinated on it.

      I'm going to go with "a)", above.

    27. Re:Childish by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      It boggles my mind that all this time, we've been sending up tanks of drinking water instead of additional scientific or commercial payloads. WTF?

      NASA astronauts are all ex-military, right? I'm pretty sure once you've been trained to kill people, you can stomach drinking filtered/purified wastewater. And I'm sure it tastes a lot better than the stuff sitting around in ISS's tank for the last 6 months.

    28. Re:Childish by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not to mention where the sewage from the city upriver ends up.

    29. Re:Childish by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Cleaner but stinking and sopping wet.

      [Other peoples!] Urine really smells bad.

      Yes animals usually urinate/defecate outside - no not in the playpark, why not? Because it's clearly marked human territory without anything attractive for the animals (save maybe some crumbs of food for smaller beasties).

      If a wild animal pisses up against the swings, fine; if it's your dog, not fine.

    30. Re:Childish by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      You can filter out salt with a membrane system?

      Reverse Osmosis systems have been used for desalination for some time.

      --

      Enigma

  11. If you want to impress me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    turn today's brownies into tomorrow's brownies

    1. Re:If you want to impress me by Bicx · · Score: 5, Funny

      McDonald's uses a similar process to create their hamburger patties.

    2. Re:If you want to impress me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plant grass in dirt
      add brownie 0.1
      grow... with photonic energy(ask at science class)
      feed grass to cow
      milk cow
      churn cow pee
      make brownie 0.2
      continue ... - woot: new space program

      Oh - drink distilled yeast pee, it's more fun!!!

    3. Re:If you want to impress me by Rary · · Score: 1

      McDonald's uses a similar process to create their hamburger patties.

      It's true.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    4. Re:If you want to impress me by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      So THAT's what their bathrooms are for!

  12. disgusting? by pescadero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is that so disgusting? All the water you drink was probably pee at some point anyway.

    1. Re:disgusting? by Steve+Blake · · Score: 1

      Water in, water out. Water back in.

    2. Re:disgusting? by maxume · · Score: 1

      For what value of probably? There are the Oceans, which are rather poorly described as 'big', competing with time, which is poorly described as 'long'. Throw in a few trillion chemical reactions and things get interesting.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:disgusting? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Douglas Adams?

    4. Re:disgusting? by Draek · · Score: 1

      Why is that so disgusting?

      Because no mechanical system is completely fail-proof.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    5. Re:disgusting? by frieko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If life has had enough time to fill the air with oxygen, it's had enough time to fill the oceans with pee.

    6. Re:disgusting? by Xaria · · Score: 1

      You might want to stop drinking water then ... because these systems are generally BETTER than your local water purifying plant. And THAT water has passed from farm to city ... cow dung in your water anyone?

    7. Re:disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the idea of drinking someone else's urine that disgusts me, it's the thought of drinking my own. Bleh.

    8. Re:disgusting? by shawb · · Score: 1
      The probability is actually not what you think.

      Every time you drink a glass of water, the odds are you will imbibe at least one molecule that passed through the bladder of Oliver Cromwell.' It's just elementary probability theory; the number of molecules per glassful is hugely greater than the number of glassfuls (or bladdersful) in the world.

      --Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion

      People really do not have a good intuitive feel for statistics, especially when it comes to number as vastly huge as the number of water molecules in a glass of water... around 7.5x10^24 for an eight oz glass. The number of 8oz glasses in the ocean is something like... (5x10^23 gallons) x (128oz/gallon)= 8x10^24 glasses, which is pretty much equivalent if my sources were correct. Which means that on average, for every eight ounces of water that Oliver Cromwell drank, on average about one molecule will be in every eight ounces that you drink assuming complete mixing. Incomplete mixing would likely make it MORE likely that you are getting one of those molecules... if not Oliver Cromwell's water, then all of the people that are geographically closer. Multiply the amount of water he drank in his lifetime by the amount of water you will drink in your lifetime and I'm pretty sure that you can make up for the losses of water molecules due to chemical, geological and astronomical processes, etc.

      So, yes. You have drank urine.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    9. Re:disgusting? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      It's a lot more disgusting if you live on a very small lot with a leech field and well less than 50 feet from each other.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:disgusting? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      That's why I only drink Diet Coke.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    11. Re:disgusting? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Since you say 'you', I'll take your comment personally. I was a lot more curious about the 'all the water' part of the comment that I replied to than I was about the 'urine' part.

      Having swum in a public pool, I have almost certainly drunk urine. The interesting questions are how often I don't drink urine, and how much of the water (any?) that I drink has never been urine.

      The oceans are about 10^21 kg of water. Global biomass is something like 10^14 kg. That's quite a few zeros to account for with time and mixing (which doesn't in any way imply that a significant amount of water has not been urine, but the interesting thing is what that amount actually is).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup crystal clear freshwater out of the stream is just another description for trout urine

    13. Re:disgusting? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      That's why I only drink Diet Coke.

      You are obviously too young to have grown up with this politically incorrect child's rhyme.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    14. Re:disgusting? by shawb · · Score: 1

      I agree that the amounts aren't really significant... a few million molecules here and there isn't much, really. Just kinda... interesting (to me) trivia I guess.

      It wasn't meant as a personal attack... if I was actually going for flamebait I would have put more emphasis on the Richard Dawkins part to bring out the IDers.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    15. Re:disgusting? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Dinosaur pee, even!

    16. Re:disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't drink water, fish have sex in it!

    17. Re:disgusting? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      R Kelly, is that you?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    18. Re:disgusting? by psyclone · · Score: 1

      Most of the water that people drink from the oceans has evaporated then condensed, then been filtered through layers of soil and pumped up as groundwater.

      So I'm not sure if your fermi-math works here.

    19. Re:disgusting? by gregbot9000 · · Score: 1

      Well I try to help every time I go to the beach ;-)

    20. Re:disgusting? by lxs · · Score: 1

      "All the water you drink was probably pee at some point anyway."

      And some of it was Hitlers pee.
      Yes even Godwin himself regularly drank dead nazi pee.

    21. Re:disgusting? by bobstay · · Score: 1

      I'd rather cow dung than human dung. Carnivore dung is far nastier than herbivore dung.

    22. Re:disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and fish HAVE SEX IN IT!!!!!

    23. Re:disgusting? by fprintf · · Score: 1

      You need to consider well depth, not just horizontal distance. If you have a 300 foot well, then you could have a leeching field directly on top of your well head and still have purer water than many municipal water supplies.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  13. Awww come-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a piss take!

  14. Recycling too far? Heck no by Titoxd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although it makes for a nice Beeb quip, no, it is not too far. Sending water into low-Earth orbit is not cheap (a launch delta-V of ~ 9 km/s) , and sending it to other places like the Moon and Mars is even more expensive. That's why it is necessary to begin testing and using this technology, where it is possible to actually send replenishment water in case something doesn't work properly.

    1. Re:Recycling too far? Heck no by ArcSecond · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your rational response is too much for the morons in the mainstream media and (unsurprisingly) Slashdot submitters/editors to parse.
      Try to keep your analysis to something a little more apropriate for a grade 3 class, please. I mean in a story that is about conserving resources, ensuring safety, and pushing humans-in-space technology forward, how are you going to draw attention to your story if you don't pander to bathroom humour and sexual innuendo?
      We don't need your kind around here, elitist.

      --

      I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

    2. Re:Recycling too far? Heck no by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      It's cold outside, there's no kind of atmosphere...

      Seriously, think of all that vacuum available for distillation, and all that cold-side refrigeration, plus the infinite surrounding junkyard, space is the ideal place to purify water.

      And if you need more, there's a fair bit circling Saturn you could probably use, with a bit of work.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:Recycling too far? Heck no by Titoxd · · Score: 1

      Ok... uhhhhh... Beavis, they said urine... uh huh huh huh

    4. Re:Recycling too far? Heck no by gregbot9000 · · Score: 1

      $250m would buy around 8574 gallons of water to the space station. At a gallon a day, for 4 people, it would take about 5.8 years for that thing to be in the black. It's certainly worth it, but trying to ship anything through the gravity well that doesn't stay up is pointless. When are we going to send a probe to find out if there really is water on the moon?

  15. Taking recycling too far by KenMcM · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd be worried if they were attempting this and they didn't take the recycling far enough.

  16. closed eco-systems by irtza · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Earth is also a closed ecosystem where we breath in the burnt remains of food ingested by our neighbors, where tap water is derived from the same lakes and streams that animals use as public toilets. Just because the filtration occurs further away and uses some natural bedrock, doesn't make it any different.

    Once you have just steam, it can no longer be considered urine, so drinking water is made from condensed steam

    I for one plan on no longer partaking in this twisted backwards environment. Long ago I employed the oil companies to convince the ignorant masses to emit large quantities of CO2 - in an elaborate plot to raise global temperatures and melt the pristine icecaps which I will then route into my drinking water. Furthermore, I will destroy this insane ecosystem that exists in this evil urine drinking manner. You may wonder why I am willing to so freely say this, but what can you do about it? What can you do! mu-hahaha.

    anyone know what we were talking about?

    --
    When all else fails, try.
    1. Re:closed eco-systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      employed or implored?

    2. Re:closed eco-systems by irtza · · Score: 1

      employed - as in hired - as in the oil companies are part of my minions - as in an attempt to tell a joke which situates me as a diabolical genius (or complete idiot) that will melt the worlds icecaps for clean water.

      --
      When all else fails, try.
  17. Yeah, well by slummy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My buddy pissed in a beer bottle and capped it off -- left it in my basement for 2 months. I forgot that it was piss and took a large swill, needless to say I was puking piss for the next hour.

    1. Re:Yeah, well by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 3, Funny

      How do you know it wasn't actually Budweiser?

    2. Re:Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do you know it wasn't actually Budweiser?

      Because he only puked for an hour!
       

    3. Re:Yeah, well by chill · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Because he was only puking for an hour, not all day.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Yeah, well by ari_j · · Score: 1

      No hangover, either. Clearly not Budweiser!

      One time, I had an argument with a Canadian friend over whether even Canadian beer was worth drinking. I compared it, like all North American lagers, to "cold, carbonated urine." The counterpoint was "Yeah, but beer has alcohol in it so it's good!" He had no comeback for my response: "You're Canadian. Your urine has more alcohol in it than any beer I've seen."

    5. Re:Yeah, well by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      How do you know it wasn't actually Budweiser?

      No carbonation.

  18. Good lord, check out the name of pundit who has by unity100 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    given the seal of approval for this pee thing - 'Astronaud Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper'.

    im not sure which fuckin reality im in, the one i know, or an alternate sci-fi universe.

  19. Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by n76lima · · Score: 5, Informative

    The waste water treatment industry has 3 levels of treatment here on Earth. Primary was what was done in the 60's and before (if any treatment). Solids were ground and held to allow bacteria to digest it (the septic tank method) and it was dumped in the river to dilute it for downstream, with a shot of Chlorine. Then secondary treatment came online in the 70's and later, which is what most municipalities do today, where the solids are filtered out by vacuum or pressure filters and burned or buried, but you'd still be able to tell that the chlorine treated effluent was far from potable.

    Finally there is tertiary treatment, which yields water so pure you could drink it (disgusting as it might seem), and this is what is implemented at locations such as Lake Tahoe CA. The water flowing out of the waste water treatment is cleaner than that in the lake itself, after the calcium filtration, etc. There are also de-nitrogenation and de-phosphoration processes to "scrub" the effluent of excess Nitrogen and Phosphorus.

    How did you think the Mission to Mars was going to supply water to the crew? Certainly could not tanker enough fresh water to make the multi-year trip to Mars AND BACK.

    1. Re:Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by CeePhour · · Score: 1

      I'm from there, and you are correct. I can not handle the water anywhere else. Everywhere I've had the water since living there is undrinkable compared to the crystal clear water available there. It has cost me a fortune in additional filters and such to get me by.

      --
      Just because you diffused the bomb doesn't mean you're not holding a half pound of C4.
    2. Re:Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I once visited a treatment plant that had a waster water treatment back to back with a water treatment facility. The water came in from the sewer system was treated to the point where it was drinkable again then injected into a reservoir to be saved for future generations. The only reason why nobody was drinking it now is because of the psychological/political factor.

      While visiting the final tank on the tour one of my fellow grad students, eager to demonstrate his confidence in the technology, grabbed a bucket that was laying around, scooped up some water and drank it. The rest of us urged him not to. "What?" he said, "The water is clean and it tastes fine."

      To which I replied, "Yeah, but who knows where that bucket has been?"

    3. Re:Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by celery+stalk · · Score: 1

      I moved recently, from a city who's water I had grown up on, to a city with a reputation for bad water. The first day, I picked up a DIY reverse-osmosis water filter system at my local big box hardware store for 130 dollars, installed it (and a new faucet, to make room for the water spigot) in an evening. The ice cubes from that water are crystal clear, and the water tastes fantastic (rather, doesn't taste like anything). Sediment and carbon filters will need to be replaced perodically (4 mos), but the RO membrane will last for 24-36 mos, and is only $50 or so.

      It was a bit of an up-front cost, but forget Brita pitchers or faucet mount gadgets, this is now the only way I'll filter water for ice, drinking, and cooking.

      --
      aaaand...whee!
    4. Re:Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      The ice cubes from that water are crystal clear, and the water tastes fantastic (rather, doesn't taste like anything).

      I don't think the clarity of ice cubes has anything to do with the quality of the water, unless you're making it out of piss or something.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    5. Re:Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Here is a neat link that explains differences:

      When the water freezes, most of these impurities are not actually included in the ice crystals, but they usually do get stuck somewhere in little pockets in the ice cubes. That's why, with our very sensitive sense of taste, we can tell the diference between different types of ice cubes, the same as you can taste the diference between water from different sources. These small differences between tap water and distilled water may not produce any obvious visible difference in ice cubes, however. A less subtle difference might arise from the fact that many taps "aerate" the water by passing it through a fine mesh with an air intake. Tap water out of most taps has quite a bit of air dissolved in it. If you leave a glass of tap water out for a while you may notice tiny air bubbles forming on the side. If you freeze the water quickly, the ice will form before the air has a chance to bubble out. The bubbles will form anyway inside of the ice cubes because the dissolved air does not fit into the ice crystal lattice. So if you look at ice cubes made from tap water compared with distilled water, you might find that the tap water ones are not as clear and transparent as the distilled water ones because of all the air bubbles inside. But this isn't a fixed property of tap water or distilled water, just in their handling (you can dissolve air in the distilled water too!).

      I heard/saw somewhere that if you use new plastic ice cube trays and distilled water, and do things just right, you can get a spike to form on the ice. Ahh, here it is.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    6. Re:Had a glass of water at Lake Tahoe CA? by pod · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest real concern with recycled water (in a short loop, like we're discussing here) is the presence and build up of all the compounds that cannot be filtered out, such as hormones and drugs that we piss and crap and throw out, and then flush down the toilet. In many cities there are measurable quantities of the stuff coming out of the tap.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  20. You kids get off of my lawn! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why, back in my day....

    No. Nevermind. I'm not going to go there.

  21. Tang 2.0? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    New and improved Tang better than prior Tang

    Another innovation spin off from the space program.

    1. Re:Tang 2.0? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Too bad for you that Tang predates NASA, much less being a spin-off.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  22. blind taste tests? by JimboFBX · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Here I'll put a blind fold on you and.. there you go, ok now drink this delicious fluid." "Hmmm its water, but it doesnt taste like tap water, it tastes filtered. Aquafina?" "No, pee" *PHHHttt*

    1. Re:blind taste tests? by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm waiting for the announcement that they can turn my shit into food!

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    2. Re:blind taste tests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, eat this...

  23. Kryten: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it taste like Dutch lager?

  24. overheard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why would I want to add pepper to my coffee?"

    "Boy these experiments they gave us are pretty lame, I doubt scientists will learn anything... say... this coffee is really bad."

    "Congratulations Mr. Simonyi, you are now our solar system's only known machine for turning yesterday's recycled coffee into code."

  25. Tell that to the guy by dj245 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tell that to the guy in this movie. The only time I watched it I was thinking that couldn't possibly work.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Tell that to the guy by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to the guy in this movie

      WTF? You should have linked to Dune, not frigging Waterworld! Now go hand in your geek card.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Tell that to the guy by bosef1 · · Score: 1
      "You cannot pee in a Mr. Coffee and get Taster's Choice."

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Dana_Carvey

    3. Re:Tell that to the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ah, nice to see ageism is alive and well. leave the poor young bugger alone, it's not his fault he was born recently

    4. Re:Tell that to the guy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it is. It reminds me of a great put down on some forum. "Since you were born after Star Wars I have no interest in your opinion on this matter, or of anything else"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Tell that to the guy by gnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tell that to the guy in this movie
      WTF? You should have linked to Dune, not frigging Waterworld! Now go hand in your geek card.

      Blasphemer. You linked to the 1984 Sting version of Dune!?!
      Here. Have a nerd's Dune link... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0142032/

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    6. Re:Tell that to the guy by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That implies acknowledging the Dune movie. No true geek would do so, as the book is clearly superior. Thus, the waterworld link sidesteps the issue. This is not, of course, as bad as linking Starship Troopers or any reference whatsoever to Highlander II.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    7. Re:Tell that to the guy by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sorry, but the miniseries was as bereft of life as Lynch's movie was blasphemous. Still waiting for the definitive version if you ask me (although extended cuts of the '84 movie are not bad). Still, got the book to read once a year.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    8. Re:Tell that to the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we should take his body's water, Muad'dib

    9. Re:Tell that to the guy by PsychosisBoy · · Score: 0

      You HONESTLY think that is a "great put down"? A seahorse shits things more clever than that.

    10. Re:Tell that to the guy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      A seahorse shits things more clever than that.

      Wow, comedy GOLD!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:Tell that to the guy by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      You can pretend liek they don't exist, but as a good geek, you have seen all of the movies listed.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    12. Re:Tell that to the guy by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This is not, of course, as bad as linking Starship Troopers

      Perhaps I need to hand in my geek card, but if you completely ignore that it's remotely associated with Heinlein and don't even try to take the film seriously it's pretty funny. Everything is so completely overdone from the ultra-fascist society to the neon-splatter bugs that it made for great comedy. I already knew it wouldn't be anything like the book and came in there with no expectations and was positively surprised. Definately a one-off though, the two sequels make even the first movie ashamed.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Tell that to the guy by vistic · · Score: 1

      If they do make a "definitive" version I hope they start with Heretics. I know if they start (YET AGAIN) at the beginning, then they'll never get around to covering Heretics or Chapterhouse, which are my two favorite books in the series.

    14. Re:Tell that to the guy by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      There's even a BBC three-part series of Dune that came out after Waterworld so he has no option to complain.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:Tell that to the guy by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pfft, heres a real nerdy Dune link... the unfinished 1976 movie version:

      http://www.hotweird.com/jodorowsky/dune.html

      It was supposedly being done by illustrious gentlemen such as Salvador Dali and H.R. Giger, but ran out of money. It also had a rather weird and political take on Dune...

    16. Re:Tell that to the guy by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I think this is showing a distinct generation gap. The only thing funny about the Star Wars reference was that it was so condescending about something so insignificant. It's not like the Star Wars films were that great anyway, they're just well-executed B-movie grade sci-fi nonsense. You can't treat the release of Star Wars like the fucking Renaissance.

      I know I'm going to be hunted down and killed for saying that, but it's my honest opinion. It's not even like the acting in the new three is *that* much worse than the old three.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    17. Re:Tell that to the guy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!

      Or should I say my Jabba the Hut lawn ornament.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    18. Re:Tell that to the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought of Starship Troopers as a great parody of our war loving, fear-mongering and supremacist media and society.

    19. Re:Tell that to the guy by SkeevePlowse · · Score: 1

      Well, I, for one, welcome our new Harkonnen overlords.

    20. Re:Tell that to the guy by ffejie · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up - this is the first thing I thought of.

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
    21. Re:Tell that to the guy by rshepherd · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand why the Lynch version is so detested. Sure.. it has a number of problems, and Lynch himself considers it a failure. But it has it's moment.. the Harkonnens? Piter DeVries? "Nurse the kitty Thufir..." hahah. I have read all six of the original multiple times, and still find the Lynch version a fun interpretation. Then again, I am a rabid Lynch fan.

    22. Re:Tell that to the guy by PsychosisBoy · · Score: 0

      *cries* You have ruined my life!

  26. Re:Good lord, check out the name of pundit who has by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Or, maybe the one you know is an alternate sci-fi Universe...ever think about that? (Yes, as a matter of fact I AM trying to make his head explode. Should be hilarious)

  27. All water used to be pee by imneverwrong · · Score: 2, Informative

    Urine is water with stuff dissolved in it. Remove the solutes, and you get water again, which is all that this process is doing. There is nothing special about it, nature has been doing this for a long__________ time, as has the republic of Singapore

    1. Re:All water used to be pee by linj · · Score: 1

      Urine is water with stuff dissolved in it. Remove the solutes, and you get water again, which is all that this process is doing. There is nothing special about it, nature has been doing this for a long__________ time, as has the republic of Singapore

      Indeed. I've lived in Singapore for some 12 years and I've got friends who actually prefer the taste of bottled NEWater (distilled human waste, if you must) over the tap water. That said, the tap water in some regions is already supplemented by NEWater, so the difference isn't so clear anymore...

      That said, water in Singapore is much more potable than, say, the LA area where I'm living now.

    2. Re:All water used to be pee by maxume · · Score: 1

      Is 'more potable' similar to 'less dead'?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:All water used to be pee by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ...nature has been doing this for a long__________ time...

      If that's a fill-in-the-blank, I claim:

      nature has been doing this for a long__effin'___ time

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  28. so does it just filter? by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

    that thing better remove the caffine from yesterdays coffee or there are going to be a few problems with the astronauts.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
    1. Re:so does it just filter? by Xaria · · Score: 1

      It's not a filter, it's distilling. It's a heck of a lot purer than just filtration, which is why it's BETTER quality water than you get in your tap. Apart from the missing minerals of course. I imagine any long-term trip into space would need to take mineral supplements to add to the water.

    2. Re:so does it just filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I was under the impression that distilled water wasn't necessarily that good for you.

  29. Extend shuttle life!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [W]ith the space shuttles due to retire in two years, NASA needed to make sure the station crew would have a good supply of fresh water.

    <rant>
    Slightly off-topic, but retiring the shuttles is nonsense. Why can't NASA extend the life of the shuttle like it did for the mars rovers, since no replacement vehicle is available?

    That would have saved $250M.
    </rant>

  30. Just like Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want the cleanest water Singapore has to offer then heavily treated sewage is the way to go.
    It's actually a brand-name drink.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEWater

  31. Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "This is our advanced technology unit" she said, lifting up a small backpack. "We've developed a miniaturized package for field parties; twenty pounds of equipment contains everything a man needs for two weeks:food, water, clothing, everything."

    "Even water?" Elliot asked. Water was heavy: seven-tenths of human body weight was water, and most of the weight of food was water; that was why dehydrated food was so light.
    But water was far more critical to human life than food. Men could survive for weeks without food, but they would die in a matter of hours without water. And water was heavy.

    Ross smiled. "The average man consumes four to six liters a day, which is eight to thirteen pounds of weight. On a two-week expedition to a desert region, we'd have to provide two hundred pounds of water for each man. But we have a NASA water-recycling unit which purifies all excretions, including urine. It weighs six ounces. That's how we do it."

    Seeing his expression, she said: "It's not bad at all. Our purified water is cleaner than what you get from the tap."

    "I'll take your word for it."

    1. Re:Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There was some good near-future stuff in that novel. Pity giant homocidal albino gorillas with stone ping-pong bats ruined it. I really didn't understand why a giant gorilla would want or need two stone ping-pong bats to kill people if it was so inclined.

    2. Re:Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by maxume · · Score: 1

      Style.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The problem is if you don't let the sweat evaporate you will have to cool the body in some other way, that is likely to be complex and take quite a lot of energy.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope it doesn't break down. They better have a backup system or two.

    5. Re:Already featured in Crichton's "Congo" (1980) by caluml · · Score: 1

      if you don't let the sweat evaporate

      Skin-tight latex catsuits? Sounds like a Sci-Fi Evil Overlord's dream uniform. (For the women though - I wouldn't want to see men in it... )

  32. Who did the alpha testing? by rossz · · Score: 1

    Think about it. I'm sure they had to try a bunch of times to get it to pass the taste test. Who volunteered to test it? How much were they paid?

    They couldn't hire winos since you could give them pure, unpurified urine and they'd say it was an excellent vintage.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Who did the alpha testing? by icebrain · · Score: 1

      I tried some during a field trip to MSFC in 1994 or so. Tasted fine.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:Who did the alpha testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably robots.

    3. Re:Who did the alpha testing? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      That's what grad students are for.

  33. A very necessary step by sdaemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If we're to survive as a species, in the long run, we have to get off this rock. Permanently. And unless we perfect some form of cryo-sleep or faster than light travel (possibly even if we DO perfect those), we're going to need some means of recycling our own waste products into usable substances.

    I've been in situations where the only water available for drinking also happened to be the local wild animals' mudhole. Animal urine and fecal matter were most certainly present, but there was no other water for miles in any direction. So it was scooped up, run through a rag to skim off any solids, run through an activated charcoal filter to purify it, pumped full of iodine to kill any microbes that might have survived the charcoal filtration, then turned into koolaid to mask the taste. Survival situations will do wonders for changing what you are and are not willing to drink. I was fortunate that I had all that equipment for purification. Those living in third world nations don't have the option of stocking up at the local REI.

    And I imagine space travelers heading for outer worlds, asteroid belts, or other star systems will have their options pretty limited as well :)

    1. Re:A very necessary step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're to survive as a species, in the long run, we have to get off this rock.

      I disagree. There is no surviving as a species, in the long run. Especially if and when we spread through space. We can only hope not to annihilate each other over our petty differences now, and in the future.

      If you were to leave Earth, even with the best possible technology, a dozen generations from now you'd see the consequences. Major problems, like nothing you could ever imagine here on Earth, would turn you into a bunch of diseased and dying mutants. Everything you think you control, will fail and eventually destroy you.

      Randomness is the ultimate problem. We're doomed no matter what or where. It's a matter of time.

    2. Re:A very necessary step by Inda · · Score: 1

      I did something like this in the scouts. We dug a big hole, pissed in it, placed a cup in the middle and covered the hole with clear polythene. A few stones round the edge and one in the middle kept everything together.

      The condensate collected on the polythene and dripped into the cup. We gained about half a cup of recycled piss at the end of the day.

      Might buy you another few hours...

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:A very necessary step by sdaemon · · Score: 1

      Technically, if the ground has any moisture, you can do that without the piss :)

    4. Re:A very necessary step by sdaemon · · Score: 1

      You're right, we should all just curl up and wait to die I guess.

  34. On the other hand... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    They should have included Zima and Baby Duck. The astronauts would have been begging for unprocessed urine as an alternative.

    Time saved. Money saved. Mars, here we come!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  35. Get over it... by actionbastard · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For cryin' out loud. The water that we all drink today, was waste from an untold number of lifeforms that have come before us. With this device, NASA is doing in a few hours or minutes what the Earth does in about ten-thousand years. The only thing repulsive about it is its 'immediacy'.

    --
    Sig this!
  36. Not that exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has already been happening in different parts of Australia for years due to serious lack of water problem.

    1. Re:Not that exciting by clockwise_music · · Score: 1

      No it hasn't. That's just what people have been telling you. How'd it taste?

  37. In case you're squeamish by DynaSoar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... just consider the fact that all the water on Earth has been through at least one animal at least one time. It's ALL urine.

    You may squeam at will.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  38. I hate to tell you... by vanyel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...but your tap water is recycled urine too, it just happens to be a mostly natural process...

  39. Who's the cretin who failed basic chemistry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That headline is retarded. It was not "urine" which passed the test, anymore than it is sewage which you drink every day.

  40. oh the pain!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...too.. many... jokes... can't.. hold...on......

  41. solids. by bronney · · Score: 1

    Hey Biff, You want to try my chocolate fudge cake?

  42. Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is NASA taking the piss?

  43. in Soviet Russia..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    well, you drink it as urine.

  44. As others have said, you are already doing it by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Contrary to what some of you might think when you drink tap water there is a very high likely hood it's been processed from the wastewater of others.

    Unless you live at the top of water supply chain (the literal top of the mountain) another city used your water source and discharged it's sewage back into it before you got it. To put it bluntly, everyone is downstream and you are drinking the wastewater of the cities upstream from you.

    Just because it flowed in a river or seeped into the ground and was pumped out doesn't change the fact that you are already drinking processed waste water. The best part is the guys in space are going to be drinking a known source. The stuff you drink has mine runoff, animal feces and industrial waste along with acid rain.

    The astronauts water will be cleaner than the stuff you drink. Especially if you are stupid enough to drink water bottled water.

    1. Re:As others have said, you are already doing it by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I only drink Coca Cola you insensitive clod! On a side note, I grew up drinking Volvic, cause where I'm from pig farming makes tap water almost undrinkable. And that thing's coming straight from a volcano, so you know no one peed in it!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:As others have said, you are already doing it by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Even if you drink only fresh rainwater, you're still getting processed urine.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
  45. haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haiku

    flask of ripe urine
    pressed to dead bsd lips
    bsd drink up

  46. Heidemarie - Are U listening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can drink my bodily fluids anyday!

  47. Stilsuit by rossdee · · Score: 1

    They recycle body waste on Arrakis too...

    Liet-Kynes: Urine and Feces are processed in the thigh-pads.

  48. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

    1. Re:No, I'm New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Its amazing the number of your posts are nothing but that. At least we have a UID to date when that particular meme must of started getting popular...

    2. Re:No, I'm New Here by kieran · · Score: 1

      I think he should be lauded for trying to kill it.

    3. Re:No, I'm New Here by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      At least we have a UID to date when that particular meme must of started getting popular...

      Uhhhh....no. My original UID is in the low 5 digits. I can say that it was popular long before someone decided to create a 'New Here' account.

    4. Re:No, I'm New Here by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      The guy made the account just for that. No doubt about it. I actually like the silliness of the joke. I shouldn't like, but I do

      --
      -- dnl
  49. what kind of idiot thinks this is a big deal?? by toby · · Score: 1

    Boiling dirty water and recondensing the steam... Perfectly simple... What's the big deal?

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:what kind of idiot thinks this is a big deal?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever try to boil water in zero g? Perfectly simple, right?

  50. next..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next up:
    brownie recycler.

  51. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome.

  52. Re:Great achievement... not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see some of those starving masses make it to earth orbit and we'll talk.

  53. WHAT 'TASTE' TEST by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Did this story pass?

    I think I'll 'pass' a little, myself...

    Degustibus nil et disputandum.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  54. Hopefully they take supplements by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    Naturally occurring water here on earth has dissolved minerals and other trace elements that are critical for our health. It is not advisable for people to drink only distilled water over any long term, without taking other precautions.

    I suspect NASA has taken this into account, and do add additives to the water (iodine is mentioned for added sterility) but just FYI for wannabe distilled-piss drinkers out there.

    1. Re:Hopefully they take supplements by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You could possibly reclaim some of the minerals from what's left over of the piss after the water has been evaporated.

    2. Re:Hopefully they take supplements by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      You mean like 'eating food'? The trace elements in typical tap water are just that, trace elements, easily obtained from other components of a healthy diet. There's no reason to put such minerals in the water.

  55. Vapours! by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Still, while I don't want to be supercritical I dew think the esteamed publication was just being condensending.

  56. Too far? Pfft. by ehintz · · Score: 1

    A quick google didn't turn up an authoritative source... However, Jerry Pournelle makes the claim that in the '70s the cleanest running stream in California was the output of the hyperion wastewater treatment plant. Which wasn't saying that the natural streams were necessarily horrible, but they do have natural pollutants (the bears gotta crap somewhere, right?), so the treated water is cleanest. Always sounded quite logical to me.

    Malfunctions not withstanding, of course.

    --
    ehintz
  57. Associative bias and perception... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    ... I always laugh at people who think "ewww yuck" at recycled water, if they knew the kinds of waste products from all the other organisms that exist in their drinking water, the lakes they swim in, etc, they would be just as disgusted. We already do technically eat the waste products of other animals and ourselves and have been doing so since forever, the fact that people are so distanced from nature I think add's a lot of distortion to their perception. Since once you become divorced from the cycles of nature, by being brought up in a modern society not having to deal with or observe such processes up close and personal as a part of ones daily living, you develop really fucked up views divorced from the processes of the world.

  58. NO new water on earth - we all drink old urine by spineboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As the father post pointed out - it's basically a closed system. We've been breathing the same farts, drinking the same urine from the beginning - it's just that it's not so blatant as in the satellite.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:NO new water on earth - we all drink old urine by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      I think we've all seen the numbers crunched that suggest that every glass of water we ever drink contains a couple of molecules of water that once passed through the bladder of .

      The harder task would probably be finding any water that hasn't been in someone's urine at some point in the past.

    2. Re:NO new water on earth - we all drink old urine by severoon · · Score: 1

      Every glass contains only a couple of molecules? More like it probably contains a couple of molecules that haven't passed thru some organism's system. The fact is that if most water had not, we wouldn't need a treatment plant, now would we? We'd just take the water that the treatment plant is treating and send it directly through to people's homes...

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    3. Re:NO new water on earth - we all drink old urine by Barryke · · Score: 1

      You are right.
      But the nerd in me states combining 2 parts hydrogen on 1 part oxygen produces "new" water, which ofcourse has a short history.

      Just wanted to get that "out of my system". (pun intended)

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
  59. Earth Urine-Water System by charlie763 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have calculations on what percentage of water hear on Earth has passed through the body of a human? What is the probability that any particular H2O molecule has passed through the body of a living organism as urine?

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    1. Re:Earth Urine-Water System by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      ~100%

  60. Is the idea of water reclamation... new? by Sousuke · · Score: 1

    This tech has been around for some years.. the only thing is, it's not actually distilled water: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newater

  61. Re:big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever posts this rubbush is obviously to stupid to realise nobody reads past the title on these silly posts. Still its amusing to see how upset the poor widdle micro dick right wingers are about having a democrat president.

    By the way the 1950's called and want their attitude back.

    Troll boy you are just wasting your time.

    Now go and get Mummy to tuck your 12 year old ass into bed, and leave the serious discussion to adults.

  62. Worse... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1, Informative

    They studied three weeks to pass this urine test. [rimshot]

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  63. Its other uses soon to be discovered by rdawson · · Score: 1

    I give the Russians a week before they realize this is a vodka distillation apparatus. Pee out the window guys, the system is tied up making us a batch of Stolychnia!

  64. Re:Electronics wholesale by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Congratulations! Hopefully, you have just ensured no Slashdot reader will ever buy from your site.

    We need a mod level lower than -1, I am sick of spam postings here.

    Could we not make a filter so when a long post, such as the usual obama one that seems to get dredged up all the time lately, simply do not get posted after the same post occours more than three times in a day?

    I am all for freedom of speech, but this is simply repeat trolling of the same stuff.

  65. Re:Tell that to Asimov by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the 'Far Star' had water recycling in the 'Empire' series. I believe the quote to the horrified Pelorat was something like, 'we'd run out of water pretty quick if we didn't.'

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  66. It's new?? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    I seemed to recall hearing that they already did this a decade ago...

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  67. "Went overboard?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At $125.000.00 USD per gallon to lift water to the space station I hope they recycle it!

  68. We already drink this in Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEWater

  69. The thing is... by JavaBasedOS · · Score: 1

    ... they still need to send some stuff up there to ensure that they get pure water, namely the iodine, which will take up a lot less space in a shuttle or an unmanned soyuz vehicle to keep water fresh.

    Let's not forget that half of the water that's distilled will be used to give the crew oxygen too, so that might have positive returns on how many Lithium Oxide cells (do they still use those?)to change carbon dioxide into oxygen, so that's less of those shipped over.

    Not only are we saving costs in materials (a tank full of iodine can last a long time), we're saving in space on those resupply runs to send more equipment for testing.

    The thing that irks me is why vent the hydrogen out? Well, they should for now, but it would be put to better use having it supplement solar power.

    It would give NASA an incentive to research and further develop what would be "fuel cell" technology and it would close the power loop as well as intertwine it with the water supply loop.

    They could modify it from:
    -100% water extracted from humidification.
    -93% of water extracted from urine.
    -50% of the purified water will be used for electrolysis to provide oxygen.
    -Hydrogen is vented.

    To the following:
    -100% water extracted from humidification.
    -93% of water extracted from urine.
    +50% of water will be used for electrolysis
    +15% of oxygen and hydrogen obtained from electrolysis will be used to provide supplimental power. (This might be used to make the entire loop cost nothing in power)
    +The remaining oxygen will be used for breathing.

    It's also possible to develop a module solely to create a hydrogen based generator. Then again, there are risks involved in that concept. Namely, the problem of space debris smacking it.

    1. Re:The thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does the power for the electrolysis come from?
      Hint: electrolysis is not 100% efficient, neither is burning the resulting hydrogen and oxygen to generate power. Since the sun is shining most of the time in space, why not just use solar cells for your power requirements? With a bit of storage for nightside passes of course.

    2. Re:The thing is... by Fzz · · Score: 1
      Let's not forget that half of the water that's distilled will be used to give the crew oxygen too, so that might have positive returns on how many Lithium Oxide cells (do they still use those?)to change carbon dioxide into oxygen, so that's less of those shipped over.

      I think you mean Lithium Hydroxide. However, Lithium Hydroxide doesn't change CO2 into Oxygen, but rather into Lithium Carbonate and Water. So I don't think recycling water would have any impact on the need for Lithium Hydroxide canisters.

      However, the ISS doesn't normally use Lithium Hydroxide. Instead it uses a zeolite-based filter to separate CO2, then vents the CO2 to space. More information is in this NASA article.

  70. Well... by thezig2 · · Score: 1

    I guess it looks like they're in trouble now!

  71. Can you imagine what is left over? by altek · · Score: 1

    Wow, I would NOT want to be the guy who cleans out the bin of stuff left over after they distill all the water out of it...

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  72. Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone ever drink boiled water from a lake or river while camping? Where do you think the fish and other water & land animals go to the bathroom? Come on people - Get a grip!

  73. Windhoek, Pretoria, Johannesburg... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Recycling waste water is common in the big cities of Southern Africa.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  74. Quality concerns by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Just remember a truly great beverage shouldn't leave you with a foam moustache that can only be removed with turps.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  75. I guess they just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    squeeze the urine out of the diapers!

  76. Re:conspiracy theory-esque by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yeah, I know it sounds like the rant ... but here's a link to a NASA page from November 2000. The device in question is the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS). And I quote:

    The ECLSS Water Recycling System (WRS), developed at the MSFC (Marshall Space Flight Center), will reclaim waste waters from the Space Shuttle's fuel cells, from urine, from oral hygiene and hand washing, and by condensing humidity from the air. Without such careful recycling 40,000 pounds per year of water from Earth would be required to resupply a minimum of four crewmembers for the life of the station.

    Honestly, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but this was pretty damned blatant. Sorry for the lack of supporting linkage. I couldn't remember the system's acronym, and I was feeling a bit lazy.

  77. It is just water by C18H27NO3+ · · Score: 1

    Most people would initially have a natural aversion to drinking recycled urine-water but if you take all of the urine out and are left with nothing but H2O molecules then naturally all you would be drinking is pure water.
    It shouldn't matter what the source was, H2O is H2O, not a water molecule with a pee molecule attached to it.

  78. Can't taste much anyway by Jeff1946 · · Score: 1

    One of the effects of zero g is loss of taste. Astronauts have told me they like to put hot sauce on their food because it has little taste compared to the same food on earth.

  79. Six astronauts... by Webs+101 · · Score: 1

    ...one cup.

    --

    "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:Six astronauts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh crap .... Thats shit not piss :-)

  80. Nasa is doing what it should be doing - research by tg123 · · Score: 1

    To all you americans ( Usa I mean, sorry Canada) this is your tax dollars being used wisely. This technology will become vital when drought caused by global warming becomes more frequent. Here in brisbane we are about to get recycled water as we have been in drought for 2 years. [brisbane dam levels] http://www.seqwater.com.au/content/standard.asp?name=DamOperationsAndMaintenance [recycle water project] http://www.westerncorridor.com.au/home.aspx?docID=1 Weird thing is brisbane for its population size has a massive dam - Wivenhoe Dam and were running out of water?

  81. Anyhow, on a deep-space mission to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...urine no position to argue.

  82. Re:big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually just supposed to be fucking hilarious, and it is. It's well-written, too.

  83. We all do this... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Everyone who lives somewhere that gets its drinking water from a river which has another town upstream is already doing this. Just without the fancy steam step...

    Everyone else does so on a longer timescale.

  84. In Star Trek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...those food replicators had to start with matter from SOMEWHERE.

  85. Life Imitates (Donovan's) Art by SonOfFlubber · · Score: 1

    This is dejavu all over again - Donovan had a song about this in 1973 called "the Intergalactic Laxative". Have a listen to it on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u846w66zTQ

    1. Re:Life Imitates (Donovan's) Art by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I'm a Donovan fan myself and I'm glad you know of that song too, I always liked that one. It's silly, genuinely humorous, and genuinely geeky as well.

      I guarantee he didn't come up with the idea of recycling urine himself, though; he probably read about it in a science fiction story. You can tell from his songs (and sometimes the album covers - there are Tolkien quotes on the back of Sunshine Superman) that he read a wide variety of stuff.

      He's a great lyricist, though, and because he references so much literature (both blatantly and subtly) it's fun to think about where he took his inspiration from.

  86. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /me hands: 's; the "Preview" button.

    (it wasn't any better with the formatting, sorry)

  87. Another perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't you glad it isn't Micro$oft running the space program. They would recycle your piss in three flavours: Home, Enterprise and Ultimate the same way they do down here on earth with the rest of their shit.

  88. Is it April already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was April I would say that NASA was trying to take the piss out of us

  89. "Good investment" requires beating competition by patio11 · · Score: 1

    In the event of an emergency, which would you rather have -- your fiddly NASA-inspired technology or a 1 cent plastic jug filled with tap water and a piece of reflective metal to signal the search party? NASA will tell you to take the water and metal. No, seriously, they do desert survival exercises (as does the Army, the Boy Scouts, etc) and its always the same advice: if you have water, survival is a matter of sitting your butt down exactly where it is and waiting for rescue. All that requires is any reflective piece of metal -- shiny things in the desert are visible from the air all the way to the horizon.

    The anti-pattern is thinking that your supplies make you invincible or well-prepared and then you go do something stupid like walk away from your last known location, to perish when you find that you were not nearly as well prepared as you thought you were.

    Now what are you going to do with the 250 million I just saved you? Well, that would be enough to provide actual drinking water to every citizen of a midsized nation who doesn't have it. Desert optional.

    Or I suppose you could have dreams of one day, in the far future, having something which kinda-sorta resembles something you read about in a science fiction novel.

    Decisions, decisions.

  90. this is done on submarines and other naval vessels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for ages

    only difference is, that the nasa version produces its own artificial gravity through rotation and it should be a lot smaller and more efficient

    why this took 250m$ is out of my reach, but recycling urine is really nothing new

  91. The already used dehydrated food.. by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    ...surely they could just send them a big supply of dehydrated water. That would be cheaper and last longer...

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  92. What's taken them so long? by PatrikDh · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one amazed that they weren't already doing this long ago?

    After all, this has been bandied about for decades as an essential space technology. And it's not as if the required technology is rocket science exactly.

    Next you're going to tell me that the space station doesn't have a rotating wheel to simulate artificial gravity...

  93. It's like that in Russia, too by temcat · · Score: 1

    In public toilets (in malls, cafes etc.), there are wastebaskets for used toilet paper. Some even have a sign inside that reads "Please do not flush toilet paper, use the bin provided. Thank you for your understanding!". Ostensibly, they want to prevent sewer clogging.

  94. Re:Good lord, check out the name of pundit who has by caluml · · Score: 1

    -1, Random Babbling?

  95. When it works by The+Seventh+Sign · · Score: 1

    You get water when it works, when it does not you get to find out if there is a diabetic among you in the old world of medicine way.

  96. Singapore already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singapore has been recycling waste water for the pass couple of years or so.

    It is supposed to be so pure it can even be directly used for chip making purposes (distilled water?) I think.

    I have yet to notice a problem with our water here.

  97. Gravitational pull??? by grozniy · · Score: 1

    Ok, so in order to boil water in space, u create a gravitational pull to keep the water down, and also pull the denser air down to make the steam rise. If they can pull the air, why cant they put this gravitational unit to use and pull all the green gases out of the atmosphere - filter out the bad stuff and save earth from the global warming?

  98. Iodine by matt+me · · Score: 2, Informative

    After the water has been through the purification system, they add iodine. They don't need to, but the water is so pure it tastse weird, so iodine is added to make it more familiar.

  99. Do you really think... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... that the air you breathe or the water you drink or the food you eat hasn't already been through at least one set of lungs or digestive tract? The Last Breath of Caesar" calculation shows that every breath each of us takes likely contains 1 molecule of Caesar's Last Breath.

    Similarly, every glass of water you drink has an average of 3.6x10^12 or 3.6 million million molecules of Titanic Water (water from the iceberg that sunk the Titanic).

    From that link:

    The same kind of concentration also applies to a glass of 12 year old malt Scotch whisky because the water came from the same ecosystem. It is a sobering thought that ice cubes floating in whisky contain molecules which were once part of the iceberg that sunk the Titanic, but it's a fact. If you wanted to have ice that didn't contain any "Titanic Water", you could achieve this by the curious irony of using ice from a modern iceberg! Any ice in icebergs now, for example from Greenland, has formed from snow which fell thousands of years ago. So, if you had a glass of old malt whisky with ice from an iceberg, the ice would contain no molecules from the iceberg that sunk the Titanic, whereas the whisky would do!

    Their disclaimer is funny, too: "Special disclaimer: We do not advocate or condone the use of ICE in whisky, and it is merely used here for illustrative purposes. We also do not condone the sinking of ships, and acknowledge that the iceberg was not entirely to blame for the sinking of the Titanic."

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  100. Re:conspiracy theory-esque by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

    Well at least in your article from 2000 the system was under development, the 2005 article I quoted from Wired had Water Security (the company that commercialized the technology) toting the system around in a Toyota pickup and using it in a foot powered configuration and taking it to villages in Iraq that had no clean water.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.08/urine.html

    So the system was viable in 2005, not just under development like it was in 2000. Its the years from 2005 to now that should concern you, though some of those years they weren't flying the shuttle. Who knows if this thing would fit on a Soyuz or Progress module.

    Don't aspire to malice and all that

  101. No by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Obama is not going to hire Brownie.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  102. Urban legend -- nothing to see here, move along by haggais · · Score: 1

    There was certainly a lot of blogospheric noise about some British agency finding Prozac in drinking water. The only problem: it never happened. Someone hypothesised (wrongly) that this could happen, someone misquoted, and the nonsense took off from there. The actual agency which "found" the Prozac has never actually run such a test. Of course, only the sensational claim is remembered...

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/aug/12/thisweekssciencequestions3

  103. Yes but then we'll have to discuss how you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EAT SHIT!!11!!!1! LOLOLO ITZ NOT TROLL/OFFTOPIC/FLAMEBAIT EITHER LOLOLO

    whispering now to appease the content filter

  104. The point isn't really to drink it by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    While the water is drinkable, the primary goal is to feed the water to the Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) for electrolysis. The OGA needs to be functional in order to increase the crew size. Currently the OGA is only periodically turned on for testing and requires bags of water to be hooked up to it. The goal is to feed the water from the WCS to the OGA, allowing for the full time production of O2 needed to support a 6 man crew. Well, not full time, as it really only functions during daylight hours when it can feed off the soloar arrays.

    The final missing piece is the sabatier system which will take scrubbed CO2 from the cabin and H from the OGA to produce water. The OGA currently just dumps the H overboard. All of this is to test how the entire process would work for a trip to Mars, with the goal of showing that >80% of the O2 needed for the trip can be gotten via this 3 stage cycle where the waste water from normal eating/drinking provides the initial water source for the OGA.

    None of this is really about drinking the water. But it does make good headlines. Afterall, if you are brining up bags of water for the OGA, why wouldn't you just drink that water. The real reason the water is so pure is because the OGA unit is much more fickle about what it drinks than a person.

  105. Deja Vu? by iceT · · Score: 1

    Now they just have to put this in a suit, and recapture all of the moisture, including sweat, humidity in breath, and etc..

    Then we can live for years on a SPICE planet for days without water...

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  106. What is wrong with peeople? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Many plants around the worlds do this with drinking water today.

    You have urine, extract the H2O and you have water.
    The only reason everyone doesn't so it is that the public is full if ignorant fucks in power.

    The water being dumped into rivers after being treated in a plant is always cleaner then the river it's being dumped into.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  107. Re:conspiracy theory-esque by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    Not mailce, but more Occam's razor applied to bureaucracy. Any bureaucracy's primary mission appears to be "survival," so making the ISS self-sufficient lessens the need for Shuttle resupply missions, etc etc. Simply delaying the water recycling capability benefits both the bureaucracy as well as the supply contractors. There's strong pressure from that end to maintain the status quo. I don't think anyone involved with the ISS or Shuttle programs would advocate shifting the assembly sequence such that the politicians could step in and close the program early.

    Eh, the engineer in me wanted the ISS to be an actual *useful* resource, and not some destination that simply justifies the existence of the Shuttle program. Hell, even without the recycling capability, just taking the main fuel tank all the way to orbit would have provided enough H2 and O2 to make tons of water - they don't run the tank dry, and the H2 is overloaded by 500kg to guarantee they don't run lean at MECO. Don't get me started on what a waste *that* is.

  108. They both have one thing in common.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I would rather drink untreated urine then watch either again.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  109. Nothing disgusting here by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    It is all relative to what you know.
    If i break down the molecules that make up urine, i will find elements of all sorts, including h2o, which also usually iron, zinc etc...etc...

    If we had an existing teleportation device like in star trek, which disassembled all the molecules into their respective kind, then you could reuse as much of each material to rebuild other parts.

    I may be ahead of the times here, but I know its not too far out before we get teleportation technology working....maybe not to the same level as in ST but we already can teleport light.
    Using the teleportation technology we woudl be able to do much....reassemble all the iron into an actual iron bearing.. or better yet all the h2o into you guessed it...drinkable water.
    Funny when you are being scientific about your point of view, how little things like this can disgust you.

  110. MMMMMMM Wang-Tang!!! by The+Relentless · · Score: 1

    Wang-Tang. Just like momma used to make...

  111. It's not all *THAT* bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cramped quarters, see the same three or four people months on end, drink not your own recycled urine, but your fellow astronauts, Bob's ... Where do I sign up!

  112. mmmmMMm Tranya by hagardtroll · · Score: 0, Troll

    MmmMmMmMmm Tranya

  113. We all, already drink re-cycled wter by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    For billions of years water has run down rivers to the ocean and then evaporated into the air and rained down onto land and run back in the ocean in rivers. We all drink re-claimed sea water.

  114. In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and now we know why!

  115. Sand by Gorgonzolanoid · · Score: 1

    spent $250M for the water recycling equipment

    You mean they sent $250M worth of sand up there?

  116. It's all recycled here on earth, anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the water in the world is recycled at least once. Your pure bottled water, even those streams of pure mountain water are nothing more than recycled dinosaur piss. Think about it: the dinosaurs were around for over a hundred and sixty million years. There were billions of them alive at any one time, including the ones swimming in the oceans. Think that they couldn't have drunk all the water in the world and pissed it out at least once in that time? No? Think again.

  117. Crap new twist on a crap old joke (^_^) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been debated here in Australia in places where water is very scarce. One issue is with hormones and drugs which get into the urine and can find their way back into the food supply via a recycling system.

    Yeah, I heard that the Aussies recycle their urine after a few tinnies in order to make more beer. They call it XXXX because they can't spell "piss" ;)

  118. Look to the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone may think this is funny, but this kind of technology is going to be necessary for ANY kind of extended deep space mission (i.e. a trip to Mars).

  119. Obligatory- by aqk · · Score: 1

    Apparently NASA has yet to bow down to our new Asparagus overlords.
        ---
      --
    -
     

  120. Re:conspiracy theory-esque by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

    My greatest shuttle waste story is from one of the MIT open courseware series. Aerospace students listening to lectures from NASA folks that worked on developing the shuttle.

    Because of the shuttle takes off and lands with different amounts of weight in its cargo bay, they had to pad launch vehicle with lead in order to keep the center of gravity in the right place for reentry.

    Supposedly this was a problem the Russians discovered building Buran as well.

    So in addition to untold amounts of liquid H2, untold tons of lead have been sent up, and returned via the shuttle.

    If you haven't listened to the series, I highly recommend it.