Slashdot Mirror


Software Piracy At the Beijing Branch Office?

spirit_fingers writes "I'm the IT manager for a west coast design company that has a small branch office in Beijing with 5 employees, a few workstations and a couple of servers. Recently, it came to my attention that the Beijing office has been routinely installing and using pirated software on their computers — MS Office and Adobe Creative Suite, mostly. We're very buttoned up about being legal with our software here at the home office, and I consider it unprofessional and risky for our Beijing office to be engaging in this practice. When I called the local office manager on this, he shrugged and replied, 'Well, every other shop here does it.' So I was wondering if there are any IT manager Slashdotters here in the the US who may have experienced something similar with their colleagues in APAC, and how they handle a situation like this." Click the link for more of this reader's thoughts on the subject.
Up until now, the powers that be here in the States have had a relatively laissez faire attitude about what goes on at the Beijing office and our accounting department hadn't noticed that Beijing never submitted receipts for software, until I questioned them about it.

I have no doubt that "everyone else does it" in that environment. Frankly, I could care less what those guys do with their personal computers, but when it comes to company-owned gear my attitude is to stay legal no matter what anyone else is doing. And it's not like they need to do it to save money: the Beijing branch turns a tidy profit. It just seems to be an attitude so firmly ingrained in the culture over there that no one gives it a second thought.

My response (CC'd to our CFO) was to ask for copies of all receipts and serial numbers for the software they're using. and see what happens. This came down today, so I'll give them a day or two to come up with something.

614 comments

  1. He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    EVERYONE in China massively pirates all software.

    Seriously, the company I work for has facilities in China and everything we don't specifically buy and install is pirated over there.

    1. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is about more than just pirated software. Depending on where the Beijing office got the software, it could be carrying a malware payload that handed over back doors to all of their computers.

      China is well known for using corporate (and other) espionage to further their political agenda. Hooking into company systems to exfiltrate any possibly valuable data is far too common.

      I would consider the computer security risk to be far more of an issue than just not having proper licenses.

      I know it's easy to say this from the outside, but if their Beijing office routinely pirates software, everything about this company's IT security posture seems very out of control.

      The OP might as well post logins and passwords on the Internet. It sounds like an extreme analogy, but the reality is that their Beijing computers are probably compromised - possibly multiple times - and any data has probably been examined and pilfered.

    2. Re:He's Right by jhoegl · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Not just in China. India also does it. Not only do they pay their workers less, but they skimp on software that we here in the USA can get busted for quickly. Outsourcing is just another commodity in this "Free Trade" world that is unfair to the USA. How can USA companies and their employees compete with people who steal?

    3. Re:He's Right by Uber+Banker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      EVERYONE in China massively pirates all software.

      Not everyone does it, as well as being illegal it's a big reputational risk. Living in China I find it quite fascinating seeing the differences large international companies, small international/foreign companies, and large/small local companies work. This topic is an example of such.

      [Cue Slashdot car analogy.] Large international corporations often do not let their senior foreign staff own a car, even if such staff state a preference to do so. A rented car and driver are cheap. The risk to the reputation of the company (and international companies often hire on their reputation for being well backed financially, esp. in white collar sectors) should a senior staff member have a well publicised accident are sufficiently high to cause this behaviour. Many more examples exist.

      Aside from other concerns like IT security, backdoors in commonly pirated software, lack of availability of software updates, the reputation with the OP's customers is at risk. Perhaps that is how the home office could be persuaded to put some force on the foreign office.

      Outsourcing brings with it cost cutting - legal software may appear highly expensive to the overseas office. It MAY BE THE CASE that the manager of the overseas office is pocketing the money, or will pocket the money if legal software is demanded, and providing fake receipts. This is not unusual. The home office should audit all software. China provides an environment where QQ (a hugely popular instant messaging program) or other software may be installed on machines and local IT/security staff have lower standards than that of the home office. Again, an audit and remote administration should be mandatory.

      I would point out that this case is not unique to China, all developing economies share work and cultural environments which may surprise, disorientate or confuse the home country office. A professional consultancy* can often be hired at good rates to ensure best practice is maintained in any developing or unfamiliar situation, helping to avoid potentially costly mistakes and lapses in judgement.

      *I run such a company but I'm not going to astroturf. Slashdot is for my fun time.

    4. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Interesting
      ... backdoors in commonly pirated software,

      Bollocks. Never seen it, or heard of it, except from software vendors trying to scare people. And I live in Hong Kong and have seen a fair sample of pirated software. Pirates are actually pretty good at customer service, most give full refund or exchange on demand. They have no interest in selling infected software, it would just rebound on them. Can't say it never happens, but there has been plenty of infected factory fresh legal software. The risk is not larger, in my experience.

    5. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Bollocks. Never seen it, or heard of it, except from software vendors trying to scare people."

      Many people had never seen a banana a few hundred years ago. They still existed. I've been to Hong Kong, and I've been to China. World apart, literally worlds apart, my friend.

    6. Re:He's Right by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When you say unfair to usa, you forget that those pirated softwares are exported using US prices, being charged to india/china/russia/brazil salaries.

      A single copy of a software may cost as much as one year of an employee's salary there.

    7. Re:He's Right by julian67 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're confusing the people who sell the stuff on the street/malls/markets with the people who crack the software and to some extent with the people who manufacture it. You're also making a mistake in assuming a modified binary in a software installer is something that an anti-virus/anti-malware program can necessarily detect. I've seen "clean" installs from commonly used and sold XP CD (in SE Asia) which contain keyloggers and so on from minute one. They were undetectable from the running machine but could be found by scanning from read only media such as live CD. The best way to get a rootkit onto many, many people's PCs is to have them install it along with the OS, or have the local PC retail industry helpfully do the work for you when they clone the pirated OS onto the newly purchased (without OS) PC using their cracked copy of Norton Ghost....and the distribution network of human vendors is efficient, motivated (profit), looks after its customers and broadly trusted. Perfect and beautiful! You pay now, wait 5 minutes.

    8. Re:He's Right by edittard · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You could say the same about lots of things. Oil, for one. Or gold.

      What you're saying is that if you can't afford something, it's OK to steal it.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    9. Re:He's Right by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The only way around it is to use a non-commercial OS, but it comes with other problems.

      Just make sure that all data exchanged between offices passes through a virus wash before it's accessed.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re:He's Right by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could say the same about lots of things. Oil, for one. Or gold.

      Not THAT horrible old analogy again!

      What you're saying is that if you can't afford something, it's OK to steal it.

      No - what he's saying is that if you can't afford something, it's ok to copy it. Now, you're free to disagree with that and in many cases I might even agree with you, but there's no reason to misrepresent the other side of the argument. You CAN NOT compare physical resources to information because information, once created, is an infinite resource, whereas physical resources will always be finite.

    11. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you're saying is that if you can't afford something, it's OK to steal it.

      No. Copyright violation is not theft.

    12. Re:He's Right by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No I'm not. Let me quote it again:

      Outsourcing is just another commodity in this "Free Trade" world that is unfair to the USA. How can USA companies and their employees compete with people who steal?

      Mind you that realities are different. The cost of pretty much everything in a place like the aforementioned places is way lower, being the salaries lower as well. That's why good food seems almost free for a 1st world tourist in those places.

      But this reality is not passed to software. American companies outsource jobs to those places exactly because they're cheaper, but charge their software the same.

      When I was a grad student there, I couldn't afford even the educational prices for an office license. So I tried to convince my teachers to accept the broken .docs that openoffice 1.x did at that time with little success. I eventually had to pirate it myself.

      Now I can afford iWork (and a mac anyway), but that's because I live in europe. I would pretty much doing the same thing if I was there, because I need to, not that I want to.

    13. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You're confusing the people who sell the stuff on the street/malls/markets with the people who crack the software

      This is how I see it, please tell me where the "confusion" is:
      Vendor sells crap, he gets problems from his customers. He gets a different supplier. Much more money can be made by selling clean software than from some unnamed evil conspiracy wanting to hack PCs at random. People in China get viruses, Trojans the same way everyone else does, by using MS software and installing stuff they find online for free -- where there is a motive for the supplier to add "evil bits" even if it only earns him a few cents a copy. Even then there is a reputation system the non-braindead use to check out quality and safety.

    14. Re:He's Right by julian67 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're still confusing the street vendors with the people who make the warez (the cracked software *not* the physical CD). For example: "where there is a motive for the supplier to add "evil bits" even if it only earns him a few cents a ....." It isn't the guy making a few cents selling physical media who adds anything (except a few scratches ha ha). Reputations: assume someone spends the whole $2 and buys XP Pro and installs it. Next step? Install a bunch of other stuff too, some from similar warez CDs, some from p2p, some from warez ftp. Now tell me how anyone who *even notices there is a rootkit(!!!)* can determine its origin? Street vendor reputation unaffected, in fact not really even relevant. I like the idea of "a reputation system the non-braindead use to check out quality and safety" because the idea contains the paradox of supposedly intelligent people trusting all their IT security to street vendors and unknown warez producers. Sweet! p.s. a rootkit is by definition very hard to detect ;-) p.p.s. claiming that something doesn't happen because you haven't noticed it, and demonstrating neither the ability nor the will to notice it, is not a powerful argument. Even if you say bollocks. Seems to me that Brits writing "Bollocks" at the start of a (usually flawed) assertion equates to Americans writing "Period" at the end of one. Neither is as impressively convincing as the author always believes :-)

    15. Re:He's Right by wisty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why shouldn't they use imported technologies however they see fit? It's not like they are stealing anything.

    16. Re:He's Right by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      This debate is so old and contentious that it feels trollish just to participate...

      But anyhow, is it still ok to copy software for which an OSS equivalent exists?

      Granted there remain legitimate reasons to use MS Office, but if these guys are just using pirated ware for mundane office tasks then fix the issue at the root.

    17. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is with antivirus vendors. They're increasingly tagging keygens for popular apps as malware, and when you look it up in their database the supposed "trojan" is nonexistant. This practice helps spread the FUD that all warez contain trojans.

    18. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      It still goes on a lot. In the telco sector, at one site a hardware engineer was seen jemmying open cabinets of other vendor equipment to take pics of the boards. This was even done under the eyes of the CCTV cameras, too, and nothing seemed to be done about it.

    19. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ask them to teach you how to do the same in the States.

      The more pirates, the more secure things will be.

    20. Re:He's Right by renoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if you activate the firewall before connecting to Internet?
      I doubt it.. My memory is fuzzy but I think that even original Windows XP had a firewall, but it was disabled by default (which was quite dumb or evil depending on how you look at it).

    21. Re:He's Right by robthebloke · · Score: 3, Informative

      nLite & vLite my friend. Not only can you remain legal, but you get a much better set of options that with your pirated CD. It can even do hands free installs so that next time someone has a problem, then can just re-do the whole thing themselves.....

    22. Re:He's Right by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      When you say unfair to usa, you forget that those pirated softwares are exported using US prices, being charged to india/china/russia/brazil salaries.
      For home or learning use I would generally agree with you.

      For business however it is increasing their unfair advantage (which is already large due to the fact that labour is cheaper and environmental regulations much laxer) in the market place.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    23. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You're still confusing the street vendors with the people who make the warez

      No.

      Seems to me that Brits writing "Bollocks" at the start of a (usually flawed) assertion

      Basically, on the whole, people who use warez are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens.

    24. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      HTML error: that should have been:

      You're still confusing the street vendors with the people who make the warez

      No.

      Seems to me that Brits writing "Bollocks" at the start of a (usually flawed) assertion

      As true as any of your other assertions about what I am or believe. (Clue: I'm not a Brit.)

      Basically, on the whole, people who use warez are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens.

    25. Re:He's Right by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      You seem to have missed the very common case: Clean software costs so much more, people don't bother to buy it. Vendor fails to make enough sales to pay his own salary and goes out of business.

    26. Re:He's Right by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>> It's not like they are stealing anything.

      I love how you took slashdotters' favorite argument and turned it against them. There does seem to be a double standard here ("I can download all the music I want! Information should be feee!") ("No, no, pirating software is bad.").

        Could ye at least try for some *consistency* in your views? I download stuff, and I freely admit that it's wrong. I'm a thief stealing from the corporate thieves who stole 1500 billion from the U.S. Treasury. I don't deny it.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    27. Re:He's Right by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      What you're saying is that if you can't afford something, it's OK to steal it.

      If it's a true necessity, yes.

      --

      Your head a splode
    28. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does windows' firewall prevent a keylogger from doing its thing? Do you even have any idea about what you're talking about? Or are you just shouting 'FIREWALL!!' everytime the topic is about security?

    29. Re:He's Right by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>>there has been plenty of infected factory fresh legal software

      Like Windows XP. Everytime I have to reinstall XP, I'm faced with this annoying virus that gives me a "Something service has ended. Automatic shutdown in 1 minute."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    30. Re:He's Right by julian67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basically, on the whole, people who use prostitutes are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens. And they never get the clap or have their wallet stolen. Basically, on the whole, people who use badly maintained electrical goods are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens. And they never get a shock or have their house burn down. Basically, on the whole, people who use heroin are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens. And they never OD, get a bad batch, get sick or die. Basically, on the whole, people who use illegally modified cars are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens. And they never break down or crash. (Compulsory car analogy, offered as part of the /. car analogy quota target program). I think I spotted a flaw in your reasoning. It's obvious to everyone that if you can't detect malware by using cracked "security" tools on a cracked OS then there simply isn't any malware there to find. Obvious and simple too! Duh. Anyway carry on with your warez. Trust all your data to the goodwill and competence of the warez scene. Believe that if you can't understand or perceive something then it can't exist. And good luck.

    31. Re:He's Right by LingNoi · · Score: 0, Troll

      So please explain why something like half the worlds spam comes from China?

    32. Re:He's Right by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Yes copyright infringement is theft of labor. It's no different from if you hired an employee to mow your grass, and then you refused to pay them.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    33. Re:He's Right by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes copyright infringement is theft of labor. It's no different from if you hired an employee to mow your grass, and then you refused to pay them.

      Actually ... no it's not. At least, not in the U.S. What one feels (according to one's own personal moral code) and what copyright law says are often two very different matters.

      Guess which one trumps the other in court.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    34. Re:He's Right by Tatsh · · Score: 0

      Software piracy in China enables jobs, feeds families, etc. I would rather see pirated discs on the street than have starving families.

      Honestly, the Chinese do not and will not ever see it 'our' way. Why? Because they do not care about anything really unless Chinese (not counting outside of China normally) people are involved. So Chinese do not pirate games like Lineage and games that look/seem/marketed/made for them.

      The security risk is high, but China already knows this and they probably figured it out even better when Windows 98 was around.

    35. Re:He's Right by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Could ye at least try for some *consistency* in your views?

      I don't see how supporting open source software and creative commons artists and wishing everyone did the same is a contradiction or is in anyway inconsistent with respecting a copyrights holders desire for profit when its used for *business* purposes. If you make money off someone elses work they deserve a cut, unless they say its free, no inconsistency there.

      I personally do see a difference between a teenager pirating XYZ's latest pop album that sucks and an umpteen million year company pirating their core business software. While it would be nice if the teen bought it, I don't see it as a moral crime they chose to spend the money on concert tickets instead. Now the business on the other hand could and should have paid for it as their income is directly related to the use of the software.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    36. Re:He's Right by MrZaius · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is about more than just pirated software. Depending on where the Beijing office got the software, it could be carrying a malware payload that handed over back doors to all of their computers. China is well known for using corporate (and other) espionage to further their political agenda. Hooking into company systems to exfiltrate any possibly valuable data is far too common.

      Quite right. Given my druthers, the first and most important thing I'd do is strip them of any and all administrative rights and, most importantly, re-Ghost the boxes nightly or run them as thin clients. The security situation is so poor in-country that you shouldn't even consider letting the local staff manage their own stuff if we're talking about such a tiny little office. Five guys wouldn't warrant a separate sysadmin in the states, and it still doesn't abroad when you've seen malfeasance on this level and are operating in a country with a massive corporate espionage problem. Again I say, strip them of their rights.

      Make sure you have a couple of spare, online, patched workstations ready to go for when one fails 'cause you don't want them to have to have local admin rights. Grab yourself an IP-KVM, too and make sure you have two ISPs running into the office, even if the second is just some dinky little 256kbps line. That'll give you the capability of having them jack a KVM-enabled computer into a switch or firewall for diagnostic purposes if one of the two networks goes down and you can't remote into those devices. Likewise, it'll give you the capability of taking a peak at a bad NIC prior to having them swap a workstation out for one of the spares. Having Ghost on the network or something like it would be useful at that time to allow you to replace the no-longer-spare equipment you've had to have them put into use.

      If I could get approval to do so, I might also lock down their workstation's USB ports and optical media to the point of uselessness and drop a monitor-less *NIX box with good AV software somewhere in the office with a ton of USB ports and DVD-ROM drives to remotely scan and introduce anything they think they might need onto the network myself. This should, of course, also be paired with an HTTP proxy that blocks any sort of executable code beyond the stuff that's used to render a normal webpage from coming in. I'd then set up MAC address whitelisting on all networks, wired and wireless. This would be a PITA, but it would give you an extremely high level of control over the network there, going far beyond what you have now, and limiting any practical attack vectors to hardware based attacks (keyloggers) and viral attacks embedded in flash apps, PDFs, etc. I don't think I'd bother with this step back home, but it seems worth it in China. Of course, this carries with it some rather dramatic drawbacks if your "design" shop is doing software engineering, and probably shouldn't be considered. Seems perfectly reasonable if we're just talking about artists or a bunch of people running AutoCAD.

      Protecting your proprietary knowledge is probably well worth the level of hassle you'd be subjecting everyone to, yourself included, by doing the above.

    37. Re:He's Right by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can you feel sorry for the Chinese, when they have been manipulating their currency to keep the value artificially low? That's the whole point. If the value of their currency is low, they can't afford to buy stuff from foreign countries, thus they keep a massive export to import ratio.

      Maybe if more enforcement was done to prevent such rampant copyright violation then they would have a little incentive to achieve a better trade / currency balance.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    38. Re:He's Right by johnsonav · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I personally do see a difference between a teenager pirating XYZ's latest pop album that sucks and an umpteen million year company pirating their core business software.

      I understand why there is a legal difference between the two. Larger disincentives for for-profit copyright infringement make sense. But, why is there a moral difference? If copying something without the copyright-holder's permission is wrong, isn't it always wrong?

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    39. Re:He's Right by ktappe · · Score: 1

      ... backdoors in commonly pirated software,

      Bollocks. Never seen it, or heard of it, except from software vendors trying to scare people.

      Then you weren't reading the news or /. just last week when pirated versions of iLife '09 and Adobe CS4 were both found to have trojan horses in them that installed "responders" that phoned home to remote control computers somewhere on the internet. Backdoors in torrented software are by no means whatsoever a myth.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    40. Re:He's Right by cpct0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      EVERYONE in China massively pirates all software.

      Seriously, the company I work for has facilities in China and everything we don't specifically buy and install is pirated over there.

      I will have to agree with you. My friend has a company branch there, and at first, all computers came with all illegal software, although the invoices were saying it came with Windows, it was a pirated version that couldn't even software update (talk about a bad hack :) ).

      My friend had to go to the store, ask for "real" Windows, he got told multiple times it was real, it's not a copy, no one here never sold any "official and legal" Windows. They finally agreed to (get this) order 5 copies, that took 2 weeks to receive, and finally he got his real Windows.

      That's the tip of the iceberg. Untold hardware changes ("But I asked for this", "this is the same" or "this is better"), specific requests for legal versions getting preinstalled cracked versions, and so on.

      You know what, we're frowning today at this practice, but in Windows 3.1 times, it was always like this in here too, and that's not too far away. When you purchased a computer, you seldom had any official version of your software. Everyone I knew had some Autocad version dangling around (why, I dunno!), and the hardware was (and sometimes still is) a black box of arcane things.

    41. Re:He's Right by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes copyright infringement is theft of labor. It's no different from if you hired an employee to mow your grass, and then you refused to pay them.

      There are more than two things happening. You are seeing the fruits of the labor, and the money changing hands. You're overlooking the work your neighbor put in to mow your lawn. The difference with software is it's not like mowing a lawn. With lawn mowing, every x units of work you invest get you paid for x units. If you mow 2x lawns you get paid 2x. There is always a 1:1 investment, and anyone that fails to pay you directly impacts you, in two ways. One, you worked, and two you missed an opportunity to work for someone else (lost a sale) because you were busy mowing the deadbeat's lawn and couldn't mow the other guy's lawn that would have paid you.

      Software development is a whole different business model. You invest y units with development and marketing, and then you sell x units and get paid x. If you sell 3x units, you get paid 3x. Once you've spent y, changes in x have no affect on y. You can increase your x beforehand by pouring more money into y with continued marketing and development, but it's nowhere near a 1:1 relationship. If somewhere along the line you sell another 1x units and don't see the payment of 1x, it doesn't even appear on the books so to speak. It's "icing on the cake".

      Theft is usually described as depriving someone of their property or failure to compensate them for their labor done for you. (often referred to as "theft of property or services") We can clearly see no deprivation of property, so the question is one of labor. How much labor did we fail to compensate you for by copying that application? (how much additional work did I just cost you by copying the application instead of buying it?) None.

      If you don't pay your neighbor for mowing, he's wasted his time when he could be mowing someone else's lawn and getting paid for it, or he could be doing some other work, or he could be relaxing. You've clearly affected him. But if this morning I install this single license on a second computer over to the right, I haven't affected Adobe in any way this morning.

      The only way to justify it is to say that if I hadn't copied the app, I would have bought it. OK that could be viewed as theft of a sale. But that always has to assume I would have bought it. While sometimes this assumption is true, often times it's not. We see that a lot with copying music. When I see someone with 350 albums of music on their 1T hard drive, do I really think they would have bought 350 CDs if they hadn't been able to download them? Isn't that just a little bit ridiculous? I'm not denying the possibility, but it's nowhere the scope imagined. That same person may have bought a dozen or two dozen CDs or more even, but not 350. Software I'd expect to be much the same.

      So there are two important differences - copying doesn't have the same direct impact to the vendor as theft, and copying does not necessarily imply a lost sale.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    42. Re:He's Right by hesiod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could ye at least try for some *consistency* in your views?

      In case you hadn't noticed, there are more than two people on Slashdot (or so I'm told) which means there are different views that come up, and consistency across the board is nigh on impossible. It everyone's views were consistent with each other, it would be incredibly boring.

    43. Re:He's Right by azav · · Score: 1

      They ARE stealing. You can't use a shovel or a drill without paying for it, even if it is imported, unless you've borrowed it or stolen it.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    44. Re:He's Right by hesiod · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, if anyone had mentioned anything about a keylogger, we might be inclined to believe you had some fucking clue what was going on. But since he was talking about patching windows before being compromised from the Internet, a firewall is exactly the right thing to bring up.

    45. Re:He's Right by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Most recent studies dispute that, stating that the USA is the largest source of spam. As far as continents, Asia is first, but still nowhere near "half".

    46. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks being them

    47. Re:He's Right by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You CAN NOT compare physical resources to information because information, once created, is an infinite resource, whereas physical resources will always be finite.

      The ability to replicate something infinity does take value away from it. AutoCAD is expensive because of the time spent building, integrating, and maintaining an awesomely powerful set of tools. By copying it, the value of the tool is reduced for the people that put the work and money into making it what it is. And I don't have a problem with those creators deciding how abundant or scarce their work is through pricing, that is an artist's (or any other creators) right... including programmers and companies that hire them to produce software.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    48. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Father Ted, is that you?

    49. Re:He's Right by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Otherwise with an original install CD the machine is compromised before I can even download SP1.

      WTF are you doing?
      www.microsoft.com click updates. not www.warez.com, clink install keygen.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    50. Re:He's Right by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      That's not theft either. That is breach of contract, and possibly violation of minimum wage laws depending on where you live.

    51. Re:He's Right by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Or more likely, their local software companies would make more money selling alternatives. And those cheap alternatives would end up on the store shelves in Europe and USA.

    52. Re:He's Right by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      Your argument would sound less ridiculous if it wasn't obvious that your average street merchant invariable is not the same person that hacked the software in the first place. If I were selling hacked copies of anything on the street for a profit of a few cents each I would be much more inclined to download it off TPB (the pirate bay) than I would be actually have cracked the copy protection myself.

      I can't even seem to find a no-cd crack for COD4 that doesn't have a trojan in it.

      --
      once more into the breach
    53. Re:He's Right by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      I don't know....with the number of twitter sockpuppet complaints I see, I'm starting to think there are only three people. Twitter, Guy-who-bitches-about-twitter, and me.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    54. Re:He's Right by VendettaMF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ha.
      HaHaHa.

      Three hours, three hours tops. That's how long your locked down machines would last before they were wiped clean and reinstalled from whatever cracked windows media they prefer. Including your fancy-schmancy-linux scanner system. It'd be running xp, vista or windows 7 RC1 before you reached the airport.

      This is China. The rules are different here. For starters, law is irrelevant. All laws. All the time. Cold-blooded pre-planned murder is a debatable situation here depending on who you know. The only actually arrestable offense is annoying a police officer or someone with a hold over police officers.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    55. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation?

    56. Re:He's Right by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Most companies know how to discount software to make the sale. I doubt that Microsoft and Adobe are unaware of such a practice.

      Odds are the cost of a Chinese localized version of Windows doesn't look like the cost of an English localized version of windows. Every now and then you hear a complaint article on Slashdot about how Microsoft is offering bundles to other countries for pennies of what's paid in the USA. And that's just when they don't opt to give it away for fostering corporate good will like the often do in Africa.

      All those free copies should come with a warning label, "First one's free."

    57. Re:He's Right by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      My father used to download tons of stuff using bittorrent and emule (I've since mended him of his ways), when he complained about wierd problems happening on his machine I found he had a rootkit installed, and several viruses. After removing the rootkit (sora or sosa.sys? - this was 2 years ago) and getting a virus scanner installed a lot of the software he had downloaded did have some extra payloads.

      While none of this was anything major like Office or anything Adobe, plenty of pirated apps did have viruses attached - and many of them were associated with control of the machine and key logging.

      So yes - I have seen it.

    58. Re:He's Right by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      What about if you borrow the drill, make an exact duplicate in your magic-no-raw-materials copying machine, and give him his shovel back?

      What if he can have access to anything he wants from you magic-no-raw-materials copying machine?

      Is it still stealing?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    59. Re:He's Right by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Could ye at least try for some *consistency* in your views?

      We're not the Borg.

    60. Re:He's Right by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Basically, on the whole, people who use warez are a lot more aware of the "dark side" and take more precautions than upright citizens.

      Really? My 11-year-old nephew doesn't seem particularly aware of anything at all. Neither does my brother whose PC is loaded full of all kinds of software he never even uses but still feels compelled to install because he gets it for "free." They also plug their machines directly into broadband with no router or firewall of any kind.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    61. Re:He's Right by russotto · · Score: 1

      If copying something without the copyright-holder's permission is wrong, isn't it always wrong?

      That's a rather large "if".

      It's quite possible that if there is a moral issue behind copyright, it is one poorly modeled by copyright laws which make reproduction the issue.

    62. Re:He's Right by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is for my fun time.

      That's a weird sense of fun. The rest of us are here because we're bored at work.

    63. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing it wrong.

    64. Re:He's Right by eudaemon · · Score: 1

      No problem, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist, of course:

      http://newsfeedresearcher.com/data/articles_t5/macs-trojan-users.html

      Of course that's for a mac, but you can google it yourself.

    65. Re:He's Right by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      [quote]This is China. The rules are different here. For starters, law is irrelevant. All laws. All the time. Cold-blooded pre-planned murder is a debatable situation here depending on who you know. The only actually arrestable offense is annoying a police officer or someone with a hold over police officers.[/quote]

      I am glad someone else understands. Everyone else assumes Chinese in China are going to act like everyone else eventually. I will never EVER believe that.

    66. Re:He's Right by makapuf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      are photoshop, SQL server, office and windows 7b1 "a true necessity" ? Even when linux/gimp/OO.org do exist (not are completely equal, but do exist) ?

      Food or shelter is something different here, and of course "it's OK" can be taken from the law or morals.

    67. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the greater point is not about piracy - though piracy is a factor. The greater point is that pirated software could easily carry malware that backdoors their company's information.

      I am kind of amazed at the number of Slashdot posters who apparently don't keep up with computer security. It was recently in the news that Apple's iWork was being passed around and it carried a malware payload. There have been lots of other examples. The people who say pirated software is more safe are full of it. We don't know how the Beijing office acquired the software they use - it could be from a warez website or from a pirate CD sold in some Hong Kong shop. But where did the software come from on the pirate CD? There is no real way of knowing how they came by the software they are using. Maybe it was a legitimate CD and just a generated authorization code. Maybe not.

      Also, just making them buy licensed copies of the software isn't an answer either. Most would just stack the legit software in a closet somewhere and then during an audit - if there ever was one - haul out the appropriate number of software licenses to cover the software installations. Their computers need to be rebuilt from a wiped disk to eliminate bootloaders, etc.

      The point I'm making is from a security perspective - not whether piracy is right or not. By allowing this branch to use pirated software and to behave like this, they have opened themselves up to exposing any and all proprietary information stored at the Beijing office.

      The security concerns are real and I would bet are more likely to cause harm to the company than charges of piracy.

    68. Re:He's Right by TheLink · · Score: 1

      He's using a dial up connection without a firewall?

      The original Windows XP is remotely exploitable.

      --
    69. Re:He's Right by wintermute000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your advice will turn the OP's working life into a living hell. Most likely relations with the China team will go to ---- and he will only be able to make a small dent anyway.

      Enforcing by fiat from several thousand miles away.... geeze I wonder how that's going to look to the Chinese staff.

      Classic case of culture mismatch + geek 'how dare they trespass my domain' indignation = epic fail

      The ethics aside, doing the above will surely fail and not have any impact on anything, leaving no traces. That in itself is a reason not to do so.

      There's plenty of other posts here that may educate the frustrated petty bureaucrat in you so I won't even bother trying to explain how incredibly arrogant and condescending you come across as

    70. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um...no. You take a chance EVERYTIME you decide to install pirated software and even when you THINK its clean, it usually isnt. For example, I know alot about computers but I do not know everything about computers. I decided to grab XP a few years ago off of a pirated software website where you can read comments about what has been posted, who has tried it and who likes it and who thinks its...um..."Bulloks" (whatever that means).

      I've now got this dual booting t20 working rather well and the pirated version came preloaded with all kinds of cool music apps and custom toys already added so I didnt have to do anything but start using it. All the audit trails of this looked great...no reports of malware or viruses from the masses of comments.

      Then I decided to scan my system due to boredom one day and found a shit load and I mean a shit load of back doors and viruses that my anitivirus didnt even blink at. Now that I surgically removed them its all good now but you CANNOT trust any pirated software period. Thats why I always use it and thats how I learn. I would rather go through this shit than deal with some clunkhead tech support who could really careless about my plight of buying riteously legal software.

      The problem with China is that you can't trust them. You can trust them to build the worlds biggest dam but you cant trust that they thought about the impact of water building up behind it that is causing earthquakes and killing their own people.

      you can certainly trust china to lie about the fact that they are software complaint when they are not. You may be all cool and good over there on your own but collectively speaking, China IS and I emphasise IS completely corrupt on the Government level... Software and all.

    71. Re:He's Right by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part about malware?

    72. Re:He's Right by blueskies · · Score: 1

      I love how you took slashdotters' favorite argument and turned it against them. There does seem to be a double standard

      Are you that much of a simpleton? There isn't a double standard here. There are some people who are inconsistent, but all of slashdot is not caught up in a double standard.

    73. Re:He's Right by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Right on! AIDS and other venereal diseases are completely absent from the professional prostitution world because everyone is so careful. It's the weekend swingers that are doing everyone in.

      And illegal car modifications are always more aware of the dangers of their modifications, too. People are stupid, whether they do illegal or legal things. They just want to get their fix of adrenaline/Internet porn/whatever, they don't know, understand or care about the side effects of such until it kicks them square in the balls.

    74. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so long ago appeared a virus/worm on pirated copies of ilife'09 and/or iwork'09.
      As always, with one sample I proof it exists.

    75. Re:He's Right by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Basically, on the whole, people who use prostitutes...never get the clap or have their wallet stolen.

      FAIL!

      Basically, on the whole, people who use heroin...never OD, get a bad batch, get sick or die.

      EPIC FAIL!

      Wow. I can understand why you think that people that use cracked software never get rooted.

      (Not that you care but the NIH shows that 22% of the adults in their study ODed on Heroin: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2039886 and life expectancy decreased by 18 years)

    76. Re:He's Right by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Do you have a point?

      If they can't afford to buy it, then they should go without. Right? Am i missing something? Why are you justifying free stuff for them just because they cannot afford it?

    77. Re:He's Right by PitaBred · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't take any value away from the core product. Are you any less able to use AutoCAD because someone else is using it?

      The language you're using... is it less valuable because everyone you communicate with knows it? Or would it be better to charge everyone who wants to learn it a fee, to keep the language creators happy? How about this post? I put work into it, damnit! I deserve some compensation!

      Information is infinite. Period. You may not like that, you may think that you can control what other people think, see, hear and do, but you can't. Copyright is a completely artificial construct that only came about in the last couple hundred years, and it will eventually again be relegated to the dustbin of history. Or at least much more marginalized than it currently is.

    78. Re:He's Right by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking particularly about software, in the same way the comment I was answering to; but I can think of cases in which those bits of software are a necessity. For example, someone unemployed with no cash training on these tools. Their prospect employer will buy them for his workstation afterward anyway.

      --

      Your head a splode
    79. Re:He's Right by cmr-denver · · Score: 1

      Enforcing by fiat from several thousand miles away.... geeze I wonder how that's going to look to the Chinese staff.

      Having been there, my guess is that it won't be nearly as poorly perceived as you think. The Chinese have had several thousand years to get accustomed to that idea. It's quite ingrained by now.

    80. Re:He's Right by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Speaking of EPIC FAILURES....

      Could you please define the word "irony" for me?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    81. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Basically, on the whole, people who use prostitutes...

      Not only reasoning by analogy, but a disgustingly offensive one.

      Fuck you. Discussion over.

    82. Re:He's Right by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm pretty sure it's just UbuntuDupe and Twitter. Which leads me to wonder just whose sockpuppet you are...

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    83. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not wikipedia, citation-needed-troll

    84. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Really? My 11-year-old nephew ... Neither does my brother

      I'm tempted to make a crack about your family, but I'll just repeat I said "on the whole". And my own anecdotal evidence is otherwise.

    85. Re:He's Right by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Then you weren't reading the news

      And you weren't reading my post. I was distinguishing between pirated software you bought, and stuff you downloaded "free". I did say the latter was more likely to be infected.

    86. Re:He's Right by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I'm the AI previously known as CmdrTaco.

    87. Re:He's Right by l3prador · · Score: 1

      So it's more like riding a ski lift with a fake lift pass, or sneaking onto a subway without paying the fare, or telling your friends you aren't hungry when they split the cost of a pizza and waiting until they get full and eating the leftovers?

    88. Re:He's Right by ParanoiaBOTS · · Score: 1

      The ability to replicate something infinity does take value away from it. AutoCAD is expensive because of the time spent building, integrating, and maintaining an awesomely powerful set of tools. By copying it, the value of the tool is reduced for the people that put the work and money into making it what it is.

      Bullshit. The reason AutoCAD is expensive is because of the QUALITY of the product. They have a damn good product. They know it, and the people that fork out the money to buy it know it too. It doesn't decrease the selling value of it if they produce ten million copies versus 1 million.

    89. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, only on slashdot.

      Take econ 101. The effect you're talking about, the decrease in price? It's because it was never worth the price they're asking for in the first place.

      Unfortunately, the margin cost of software is zero. ALL software. Piracy moves the average price towards that. This is just markets in action.

    90. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaa!! This is the most eloquent and ridiculous argument to copying i.e. stealing software.

      So let us expand your argument a bit. Say Company-A, starts with $1M in capital to build software X. After spending $1M, it sells software X and makes $1.5M in revenue over several years. Now it comes time to upgrade the software for which the price-tag is another $1M. Where do they get that extra $500K they need to invest in the upgrade? Shareholders? Bonds? Personal Funds? Either way, if you and your ilk had not been copying that software, the company would have had more money to upgrade OR to distribute profits to its shareholders/owners.

      Another example, assuming that you possess some selleable skill. You have built that skill over years of college and hands-on work experience. At some point in your career, your experience enables you to do certain things blindfolded in a few hours while a newbie would take days and weeks to achieve that result.

      So should I pay the same hourly rate to you and the newbie? You are not doing any "extra" incremental work to finish the job so why should I pay you more? Did you say you deserve that for the "investment" you made in building up your skills? Well, what about the software company's investment in the current product and proposed investment in the future of the product? Aren't you stealing from those investments when you copy?

    91. Re:He's Right by bestalexguy · · Score: 1

      Instead of a host of smart analogies, wouldn't it be more interesting to give a pointer to a true case? C'm on this is /. we like facts more than opinions. Oh, I see, "Insightful" was the goal.
      To clarify: I'm not advocating the opposite position, I'm just reading the whole thing and not getting more info on the subject than I had before.

    92. Re:He's Right by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      But anyhow, is it still ok to copy software for which an OSS equivalent exists?

      I wasn't arguing that it's ok, I was just correcting the guy's misinterpretation of the original argument. As a matter of fact, I don't think it's EVER ok for a business to violate copyright, and I'm not a big fan of individuals doing it either. Back when I was in highschool, I pirated MS Office because no real alternative existed and I didn't have much money. Today I use OpenOffice even though I could easily afford MS Office. So I would certainly encourage the use of OSS whenever practical, and I'd aggressively pursue any corporations which knowingly pirate.

    93. Re:He's Right by Rasta_the_far_Ian · · Score: 1

      Interesting point about the banana.

      As a fruit related aside:

      I remember seeing on a documentary that bananas starting appearing in grocery stores throughout the continental US in the (1930s? 1940s? - sometime in the early-middle 20th century), and were considered exotic fruit.

      Seems amazing now - but then I remember that when I was younger most people I knew didn't know what a mango was ("some sort of papaya?"), and had certainly never seen one. Now they are available in every grocery store.

      Modern technological progress isn't restricted to computers!

    94. Re:He's Right by muridae · · Score: 1

      Hahaa!! This is the most eloquent and ridiculous argument to copying i.e. stealing software.

      So let us expand your argument a bit. Say Company-A, starts with $1M in capital to build software X. After spending $1M, it sells software X and makes $1.5M in revenue over several years. Now it comes time to upgrade the software for which the price-tag is another $1M. Where do they get that extra $500K they need to invest in the upgrade? Shareholders? Bonds? Personal Funds? Either way, if you and your ilk had not been copying that software, the company would have had more money to upgrade OR to distribute profits to its shareholders/owners.

      Nope, they wouldn't have the money at all, cause I wouldn't have bought the software. This is where the analogy between theft and software piracy falls apart. All because there are two kinds of pirated software.

      The author of this article is worried about one kind of copyright infringement: someone who could afford said software and just copies it out of habit or culture. That does deprive the company of some money, in the long run, because if they didn't pirate it they would probably have bought some of the software. The other kind of pirate is the 13 year old in their parent's basement, the college student, and others, who wouldn't have bought the software in the first place. Can anyone provide an economical argument that a 13 year old using AutoCAD/Maya/CS4 at home is a bad thing? I would argue that this would increase the producer's monetary value, as the kid would be more likely to find the software interesting and purchase it when they get to or out of college. In the long run, it increases the number of products sold, and in the short run it doesn't cost them a sale, because the person copying the software would not have bought it in the first place

    95. Re:He's Right by jridley · · Score: 1

      There are solutions to that. Crypto sign the install. Ping the machines for the key occasionally. If it changes, ask them why. Fire the people who did the changing.

      They're a BRANCH OFFICE, they need to play by your rules. If you're paying for their software, and requiring them to use the paid-for version, why would they wipe it and install an identical pirated copy?

      That's like saying "Here's a company car to use to go to your meetings" and having the employee say "no, I don't like using paid-for stuff, I'm going to go out on the street, break into an identical car, hot wire it and drive that instead."

    96. Re:He's Right by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      I'm not bright enough to figure out the whole 'copying is stealing/no it is not!' situation. I'm a software professional and I'm quite sure that my industry needs income to survive. If somebody has done some work that they have spent time and effort and therefore money on to create value and they want paid for it and I then copy their work and use it without paying them, I'm doing them a dirty turn.

      Don't look at this in terms of stealing a tangible good, look at it in terms of an author's right to specify under what terms someone can use his product - and no, I'm not talking about what *is enforceable* just what sort of world we might want to live in. Someone created something and they are asking that I respect their terms of use and compensate them. If I don't, I *know* I'm taking the product of their work, deriving a benefit from it, and not respecting their wishes. In a world where that happens all the time, there is a lot less incentive to do such work as you can't afford to eat.

      So, at the very least, I try to buy my albums or songs, buy the software I use, etc. I do use some open source freeware - I also appreciate the people who build this. But I don't assume everyone wants to operate like this. I know some bands want me to send them 'what I think their product is worth' and if they're good, I'll send a fair bit. I want to support these folks. But again, I'm letting *them* determine the terms of use they wish to set for their efforts/products.

      I do this because I'd very much prefer living in a world where, when I write something at work, others respect the terms of use for my work as created by my employer. It's simply a matter of thinking how I'd like to be treated and extending that into the world which seems an ethical way to go about life.

      I know there will be pirates. I know in some cases, people need a piece of software and can't afford it, so they boost it. I don't like it, but I know it happens. However, I also know a lot of the time, people say they can't afford it when what they really mean is 'I could afford it, but I'm going to spend the money on something else instead' because if they can get free stuff, they feel no ethical obligation to remunerate the producer, even if that person has asked them to by creating terms of use that require it.

      But knowing these folks exist doesn't mean their sort of world is the one I'd want to encourage. Maybe this is the way we should think about the whole pirate/not-pirate issue. At least it strikes me as a decent sort of scenario if most people approach things thus.

      Now, my pet peeve about software licensing:

      I have a big hate on for inflexible licenses. If someone sells me a piece of software (say an office suite) for my home office and I'm one guy, I have a dev/work desktop, a dev/work laptop, and a netbook (plus maybe a few servers for backup or web surfing at home). Now, most modern licensing schemes want me to buy N copies (where N = number of computers) even though *I can only be using one of them at a time*.

      Given the evolution of modern small networks in people's houses, why the heck haven't they developed better small network floating licenses? I'm not talking a corporate floating license which will be used by N people at a company who are employees. I'm talking about a home or home office license that has one 'employee' or 'owner' who needs to use things on multiple computers. I guess I'm arguing for 'per user' licensing rather than 'per machine' (for most things - maybe not OS). The lack of such flexible licensing probably leads to a lot of small office and home software piracy.

      The one piece of software I recently downloaded that gets this, oddly enough, was an RPG tool called KloogeWerks. It actually allows you to buy floating license packs for clients so your local small server can support a varied group of clients. That's the sort of modernization of licensing paradigms we need to see more of. Either per-user or floating office licenses for reasonable prices.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    97. Re:He's Right by jridley · · Score: 1

      Well, here, now you can't say you've never seen or heard of that:

      There's a pretty serious trojan going on for Mac OS X right now that you contract by running a pirated copy of iWorks 2009.

      http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9126609

    98. Re:He's Right by azav · · Score: 1

      Please wait while I consult my legal council on this matter. Can you hold?

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    99. Re:He's Right by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      If it takes a certain amount of money to pay workers to create the software and the cost is spread among fewer people because some of those who use it choose to not pay for it, then the cost to those that do pay for it must necessarily be higher than it would with more people paying a share (this is even more exaggerated than with products that have a non-trivial duplication cost). Obviously less than 100% of the price of software is going towards paying the costs of its creation, but that's what we in the western world call profit and the potential for that profit is why people risk the initial investments that make things happen.

      I think free software is fantastic, but those that argue that the existence of some free software makes all software costless are deliberately missing the point

    100. Re:He's Right by AxeTheMax · · Score: 1

      So what is the reason for the relatively low price of the almost equally good (for all purposes that I have anyway) Intellicad?

    101. Re:He's Right by jridley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heck, there's a clone builder a few miles from where I work (in Michigan, in the US) that used to (10 years ago) load up EVERY machine that they sold with pirated Windows and tons of software (games, Office, etc). You got a 20 GB hard drive on it (this was a while ago) it was half full of pirated stuff.

      I helped a friend spec a machine there, and we told them that we needed legal copies of Windows, Office, and one or two other things, and we did NOT want any other software on the machine. It took them a week to get the software (they didn't have a SINGLE legal copy of Windows or Office in the building!) and they totally screwed up the install, because they normally just Ghosted in the OS (with a pirated copy of Ghost I'm sure) with all the pirated crap on it, and they weren't used to doing bare-bones installs on fresh machines. I wound up having to reinstall everything myself.

      This was a place that sold a few thousand PCs a year, with a storefront, in the US. And they did it for years, and I never heard of them getting in any trouble over it.

    102. Re:He's Right by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      *WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH*

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    103. Re:He's Right by Gribflex · · Score: 1

      When I see someone with 350 albums of music on their 1T hard drive, do I really think they would have bought 350 CDs if they hadn't been able to download them?

      While it's true that we cannot definitely say that you would have purchased all 350 albums had they not been available for no charge by download, I think that it is fair to say that, if you're the sort of person that has 350 albums on your machine, you would have purchased at least one of those albums had none of them been available for download.

      Maybe another way to think of it is to slightly flip the question. What if one album was downloaded by 350 different people? We have no way to say that if the album was not available, all 350 people would have had the desire, ability, or means to purchase that album. However, it is very likely that at least one person would have.

      The really interesting question is to determine what the percentage of downloads could have been sales if the item had not been free, or if the ability to access the item legally had been more available?

    104. Re:He's Right by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      But isn't assuming that pirating has no effect on the publisher just as dumb as assuming it is a loss of a sale? You're attacking the people who are making an assumption that you would have bought the software, but you seem to be taking it for granted that people who use pirated copies would never have bought it. One of the things that people do when they create software is estimate the market for it by trying to figure out how many people would have a use for it. If massive amounts of people who would have a use for the software aren't willing to spend any money on it at all, how can you afford to create it?

      Given how obviously different the situation would be if every single person pirated all their software, why is it so hard to see that the impact of individuals doing that is not zero?

    105. Re:He's Right by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      OK, time for a little copyright theory. When dealing with non-physical goods (that is, more or less anything currently covered under the umbrella of Intellectual Property) you're got two competing drives. On the one hand, you want it to be freely available to everyone so society can benefit from it, and so that we can progress intellectually (that is, in short not waste time re-inventing the wheel, but make a better one instead). On the other hand you need a system of incentive to repay the creator for the effort that went into producing the item (remember non-physical, so this isn't the production cost, but rather the time cost of creating the original). Various cultures over the years have come up with various ways to balance these two to varying degrees of success. The approach the American forefathers took was to side with the creator for the short term by granting a temporary monopoly, but the public in the long term by limiting the term of that monopoly to a short period (I'd need to go look it up, but I believe it was something like 15 years). The thought behind this was that the short term monopoly would provide enough time for the creator to recoup the time cost plus some measure of profit, while long term still making the good available for free to the public (public domain). Over the years this has been grossly perverted to the benefit of the producer and the detriment of society, such that we have the current state of affairs where copyright of any new works is effectively infinite, thus completely depriving society of the benefit of the good.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    106. Re:He's Right by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There can be a lot of politics and cultural issues involved here.

      I've known people sent to foreign plants with a mandate to institute some change, and they've made changes to the plant design only to come in the next day to find those changes reversed. The changes were made again (with managers nodding the whole time) and again the changes would be reversed overnight. Said changes involved welding pipes and adding hardware and stuff like that (this was a chemical plant). It was apparently something to behold. In this case the cultural issue was that "yes" meant "yes, I understand" and not "yes, I agree." Having traveled a little to asia on business myself I've encountered similar situations (not to this extent).

      Rarely will company senior management step in on something like this, unless there is a real cost to the company involved. They just care that they can say that they're outsourcing x% of their work or whatever the driver is. As long as those Chinese branch workers are selling product or are being paid less or whatever the driver is, the office isn't going to be closed. And if the branch office manager was hired because they're friends with the local party leader then good luck getting rid of him.

      Business in China doesn't always work the same as business in the US. The cultures are very different. Sometimes you need to put your foot down, and sometimes you need to decide if a hill is worth dying on...

    107. Re:He's Right by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      Bollocks. Never seen it, or heard of it, except from software vendors trying to scare people. And I live in Hong Kong and have seen a fair sample of pirated software. Pirates are actually pretty good at customer service, most give full refund or exchange on demand. They have no interest in selling infected software, it would just rebound on them. Can't say it never happens, but there has been plenty of infected factory fresh legal software. The risk is not larger, in my experience.

      Trojan Hides In Pirated Copies of Apple iWork '09

      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/23/0127253

    108. Re:He's Right by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The ability to replicate something infinity does take value away from it

      It takes away value on a per-unit basis, sure, because value is a function of supply and demand. But if you can make 6 billion copies at essentially the same price as 6 copies, then the per-unit value is irrelevant. However, I think it's both evil and counter-productive to artificially limit the supply in order to increase the demand (and, therefore, the price).

      And I don't have a problem with those creators deciding how abundant or scarce their work is through pricing

      I don't either. But I also won't have any sympathy for them when potential customers flip them the bird and just copy their work instead.

      If MS actually charged a reasonable price, people would be more likely to pay. Instead they charge an unreasonable price and most people use it for free, while people who can afford it subsidize those who can't. Either way MS makes the same amount of money, but by charging an unreasonable amount they actually encourage piracy. You can argue morality all you want, but there's no disputing the end result - higher prices on an infinite resource result in more piracy and rarely (if ever) generate higher profits.

    109. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given China's desire, and seeming need, for free software, wouldn't it be better to have the home office ban pirated software and switch everyone to Free software? That would probably eliminate your legal worries overnight, probably add to the overall security, and save money, all at the same time. And making such a move could give a reason for you and your boss to get a bonus from all that money saved.

    110. Re:He's Right by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yes, I remember being at one very large company, and periodically we'd get spammed by an email virus. We'd had all the computers cleaned up, the protection was put up, memos sent not to open those particular emails, etc. Then a month or two later it would hit someone in a Chinese office and everyone would get a few emails from China. And then the next month again, and the next month, and so on. Then it actually stopped for over a year, only to resurge once more.

      If I had been IT, I would have yanked their internet connection and done all business with those sales offices using third class snail mail.

    111. Re:He's Right by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      You'll probably find that they weren't doing anything against local laws. Copyright is not a clear-cut issue in China. It explicitly excludes foreign nationals for example, so businesses must set up joint-ventures just to give them some kind of backup.

    112. Re:He's Right by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

      A perfect explanation of why a 'lost' sale doesn't always affect the company, and almost never affects the typical employee.

      Do you guys remember those MPAA ads where they showed script girls and lighting technicians begging you not to take away their paychecks by pirating movies? They were bullshit. Any product, including movies or software, that breaks even has paid every single hourly and almost all salaried employees *in full*. It's only when it *doesn't* break even and actually loses money up front that you can unequivocally argue piracy alters employment or social justice.

      When you pirate a product that broke even in retail you harm executives and stockholders, not employees. In the long run, you can tell me that employees can own stock, you can argue about whether the economics of investment and the stock market squeeze out the company with the more-pirated product, you can argue all kinds of crap.

      You cannot tell me, however, that pirating a successful product *ever* directly harms someone's ability to earn a salary coding or supporting that product.

    113. Re:He's Right by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Keeping that price discrepancy only encourages the wage discrepancy.

      Also, remember that this is about a profitable business, not a single employee.
      The software company probably employed American people, so why should they sell below-margin just so that other countries can get it cheaper?
      In all likelihood, they are using it on hardware that cost almost as much as in the US.
      And they have to compete with other countries for all other production costs. Steel doesn't have a "china discount".

    114. Re:He's Right by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      China is well known for using corporate (and other) espionage to further their political agenda. Hooking into company systems to exfiltrate any possibly valuable data is far too common.

      Not unlike the United States, the Soviets, the Israelis, etc.

      Even if a company mandates Pure licensed Software, that does nothing to prevent local espionage. The Chinese government probably has insiders in the company if it's worth anything, anyway.

    115. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also a bad analogy. With software, you are purchasing the right to use the software, not the software. This is why it is referred to as a license. It has a lot more to do with copyright protection and intellectual property than theft of physical property.

      It is illegal to take someone else's work without permission, especially when there is commercial gain.

      In this case, the direct commercial gain is obviously not paying that license.

      Comparing it to theft misses the mark. What if someone 'borrowed' your car but put it back after a few hours and even topped off the gas tank. Where is the crime there? There was no loss of property.

      The crime was in the unauthorized use of something without ownership.

    116. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at EDA software. Synopsys, Cadence, Mentor et al pay 100 million for whatever, PrimeTime, XA. We in the west pay 200 million in licenses, the developers pay their developers and their shareholders. The crackers pay nothing, make their chips, and outbid us. We lose market share. We lose; downward spiral. Same player shoots again.

    117. Re:He's Right by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      exactly! Especially the pizza bit.

    118. Re:He's Right by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      Bananas aren't all supposed to be yellow either. See chikita; banana republic; mercenaries; para militaries; coups, etc etc. Learn your history to understand why so many countries foster anger toward the USA.

    119. Re:He's Right by Rennt · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with the creators deciding how abundant or scarce their SALES will be through pricing either :P

      Seriously though, AutoCAD is valuable because it is a tool for making expensive products. Its value is in no way reduced by students making copies, just as its value is in no way increased by charging more for it.

      AutoCAD is actually a really good example of how software can have the same value regardless piracy. The company has more than enough customers who are happy to pay whatever they ask, and nobody who rips it off was ever going to buy it anyway.

      If anything piracy provides the marginal benefit of getting the next batch of draftsman and engineers and what-have-you's hooked on AutoCAD so they insist that it is the only tool they will work with.

    120. Re:He's Right by blueskies · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHA!!

      OMFG. I thought it was the original asshat that i was responding too.

      It really sounded exactly like what 1u3hr was saying in all the other posts, i didn't even see that the reasonable poster had written it. Actually i hadn't read past the Heroin junkie part before everything went red...

    121. Re:He's Right by blueskies · · Score: 1

      yep...see my piss poor explanation in the previous post. ha.

    122. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not bright enough to figure out the whole 'copying is stealing/no it is not!' situation.

      I call bullshit. Unlike the majority of Slashdot users, you got it exactly right. Well said!

    123. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in China for 3 years as manager of a technology team. From my experience the ONLY way to stop it is to get a foreign manager locally to enforce the rules. You can't just stop the use of the software, you NEED to have someone there to enforce the culture for WHY stealing is bad.

      Otherwise when you clean out the illegal software, I promise you, it will creep back in over time. People don't see it as wrong.

      Consider this: How many Americans drive under the speed limit? Close to zero. Why? We don't see driving a few MPH over as a bad thing. Same with China and software. Chinese culture considers software, movies, music as being inherently free. If you whine about their use of pirated software, it'll have the same effect as your mother-in-law whining about your speeding. You'll probably slow down (begrudgingly) while she's in the car. But as soon as she's out of sight you're back to your old habits.

      Either give up, shell out the cash for them to get legit copies, or get a foreign manager.

    124. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have worked in the Beijing office of 3 foreign companies, and while no doubt individuals may at times have installed pirated software on their laptops, Corporate IT have *never* shrugged their shoulders and said it's OK. All apps that people use for work have always been legitimate copies. I also know friends who work in government offices over here and they tell me that over five years ago there were fairly aggressive moves to get all the office machines free of pirated software. I can't vouch for the success of these initiatives, but I can certainly say that "everyone does it. It's normal" is just plain untrue. It is a sop for poor governance, and lots of people do care and try to use legitimate software.

    125. Re:He's Right by maRwilli · · Score: 1

      Wintermute has a point. I would say an approach like "I don't care what everyone else does. We are an American Company and have to be careful to obey the laws of both China and America here" might work better. Your counterpart will be well aware that software piracy is illegal in both China and the US. S/he will also be aware that "everyone does it" is not strictly true, even in Beijing. Well-run operations don't need to pirate software these days, because these days legitimate software is easier to get and the Chinese version is also usually very inexpensive here, taking away the reasons why piracy was almost universal even 5-7 years ago. What you might look at is how hard is it for the local office to actually procure legitimate software? Do you have stupid head-office accounting rules that make it impossible for staff to buy software from a local shop at the local price and then expense it?

    126. Re:He's Right by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

      Being Chinese myself (and having been there LOL)

      I'm telling you that more likely than not (and I guess we're all speculating here, not knowing all the facts) they'll just give the arrogant yankee the runaround. We're masters at doing this.

      Of course we're used to being governed my fiat, which is why we're used to playing smoke and mirrors with everything. Rules are only guidelines. Also don't underestimate the racism / lets exploit the stupid rich foreigner / repressed cultural rage from 19th century etc. factor.

      Being a chinese speaker and 100% ethnically chinese, even I cop it sometimes because from my accent its immediately obvious I'm from overseas.

      Anyhow I wouldn't even bother as long as its not my a$$ on the line of MS bother to audit. If it is, I'd go the path of minimum resistance, make sure my behind is coverd without p1ssing off too many people. The loud and by the book Western approach will only antagonize.

    127. Re:He's Right by zigfreed · · Score: 1

      Stateless clients FTW!

    128. Re:He's Right by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      The point of the grandparent's installs was to have machines with limited privileges. The USB port lockout alone would be sufficient to ensure the eradication of the install.

      The OP never mentioned having the authority to fire anyone from the Chinese office. If it came to it though, nothing other than firing the entire staff and replacing them with an all-western crew would suffice.

      And your analogy fails completely on the basic piracy != theft test.

      Think of it more as "Here is a company car you must use, which has its stereo, sunroof, ac and electric windows disabled for no reason we can convince you of. No, we don't want you to go and buy an identical copy with all features enabled, because our law says it's bad".

      >> play by your rules.
      Dude. Wrong. One word : China.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    129. Re:He's Right by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Given the current state of worldwide economics I think we're more likely to see more people acting in a similar manner to the Chinese systems first.

      The only way the OP could possibly make any headway would be to find the main influencer in the Chinese office (probably the most senior manager, but not necessarily) and first befriend him (No, not him/her. This is China) which would involve several fancy dinners, large quantities of alcohol (beijou suffices between Chinese, but from a foreigner they will expect something more expensive) and visits to local "massage parlors".

      Once befriended he could be convinced that the software situation was an inconvenience for version control, or communication or something. Anything that doesn't involve the law. Once the law is mentioned it'll all be brushed off with a "not a problem, not serious".

      Of course, were OP dumb enough to let an unblemished corporate key fall into the hands of the Chinese office it would be sold to the local beige box assembler within the day.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    130. Re:He's Right by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      Meh. You are simply, wrong. Obviously you know nothing about China or the Chinese people and assume you can infiltrate with ease. Dream on, especially with that idea to lock down USB ports and optical media.

    131. Re:He's Right by dotar · · Score: 1

      Oh man, you are making me nostalgic.

      I gotta get back there sometime.

    132. Re:He's Right by v1 · · Score: 1

      Any product, including movies or software, that breaks even has paid every single hourly and almost all salaried employees *in full*

      Though I thoroughly agree with your point, due to Hollywood Accounting, no movie ever breaks even. Or if it does, someone gets to buy another solid gold caddilac.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    133. Re:He's Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Everybody in China does it, it's saving your company money, and it's standard business practice there.

      Go with it. Don't try to buck the trend.

      Just make sure your antivirus is up to date.

    134. Re:He's Right by marnell · · Score: 1

      vl, your misguided analogy stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of capital. The measurement of lost sales does not have to be a bijection to have a direct impact. What if only 1 in every 1000 people who copied software illegally would pay for it if that was the only option to acquire it? That's still a very clear and direct impact. Like you mention, a person who is paid per lawn mowed is also definitely directly impacted by the loss of revenue. However, what about the person who owns the lawn services company? It is money out of his pocket too, when someone doesn't pay, and he spent the vast amount of resources to build the business. For a large company it may not mean much at all to his bottom line but you can't really believe that it doesn't affect him, do you? A lost sale is a lost sale. He lost revenue, regardless of how little a fraction of his total gross it was. So you could have or would have mowed it yourself, you say? Well, you didn't. Maybe he no longer actively manages the company but sails around the world on a yacht and puts in absolutely no labor and immediately takes out any resources the company produces. It still makes no difference, you still owe him and he still deserves to capture any bit of return on his investment he legally can. If that doesn't jive, how about the following example: pirating software is similar to a tenant skipping out on rent. Just because the builder turned landlord didn't do a darn thing to improve or manage your apartment in the last 10 years, since he originally built it, does not mean he isn't entitled to receiving his fees for your access to his capital. He still paid Y for the building and deserves to get his X each and every month from anyone that *chooses* to live there for as long as he owns that building. It has nothing (nothing!) to do with how much effort or resources he may or may not have or ever will put into the building. It has to do with ownership. If you created it, bought it, or otherwise own it, generally speaking, you also own the right to say how it can be used and at what price. (period!) Buyers make the choice to accept or reject those terms... and if you try to squat in his building he will have the Sheriff toss you out on your butt. Finally, your summary statement: "copying doesn't have the same direct impact to the vendor as theft, and copying does not necessarily imply a lost sale." implicitly acknowledges that while (1) copying doesn't have the "same" impact, and also (2) does not "imply" a lost sale, it still has an impact on revenues for rights owners. Considering that you aren't the rights owner in this case, you don't have the right to classify how significant that impact may be in real or intangible terms. Sorry, but that's the bottom line. Think it's unfair? Go create something. Then you can release it free if you like.

      --
      M
    135. Re:He's Right by v1 · · Score: 1

      Can anyone provide an economical argument that a 13 year old using AutoCAD/Maya/CS4 at home is a bad thing? I would argue that this would increase the producer's monetary value, as the kid would be more likely to find the software interesting and purchase it when they get to or out of college. In the long run, it increases the number of products sold, and in the short run it doesn't cost them a sale, because the person copying the software would not have bought it in the first place

      I also recognize that a kid that knows how to USE the product increases the value of the product. It's a diffused effect I know, but if a dozen said 13 yr olds pirate autocad and get proficient at it and discover they have a knack for CAD, and go to school for it and hit the streets, there are a bunch of CAD educated staff for companies to hire. Intelligent CIOs that are shopping for a new CAD product will look and see what titles are going to be easier (or cheaper) to get skilled staff for. These grads are staff that will both be in the job market for CAD, and that will recommend autocad to their employer since they are familiar with it and it's their CAD of choice because they've been using it for years.

      This results in increased sales and market share for autocad, at ZERO cost to them.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  2. Let the directors decide. by GrpA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why make the decision yourself?

    Send an email to the directors just confirming this is what they wish to do and that they don't want you to take any action on this matter.

    Then it's not really your problem anymore.

    Passing the buck works both ways :)

    GrpA

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    1. Re:Let the directors decide. by lordsid · · Score: 1

      Plausible deniability.

      --
      IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
    2. Re:Let the directors decide. by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you want something to happen, try reporting the situation to the Beijing branch manager, and CC a higher-up of appropriate stature at the home office.

      Speaking as a Chinese, and having much dealings with my kind, I can say that Chinese people will shit a brick when it comes to potentially pissing off a higher-up in the States.

    3. Re:Let the directors decide. by Corbets · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One could (and I would) argue the ethics of allowing someone else to decide whether an immoral or illegal act should continue. "Passing the buck" is for cowards, no matter the direction; I think this fella is doing the right thing in trying to solve the problem.

      Besides which, proof that the directors of a company want something to happen is not absolution of your complicity. Suppose you know someone was cooking the books; do you suppose an email from the directors saying "it's ok" would be enough to absolve you when the IRS came in?

      My 2 cents, at any rate.

    4. Re:Let the directors decide. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      My response (CC'd to our CFO) was to ask for copies of all receipts and serial numbers for the software they're using. and see what happens.

      Sounds like that's more or less what they did. Or at least, the decision has been made, with plenty of CYA, and, I suppose, an opportunity for the CFO to back out and make Chinese piracy a corporate policy.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    5. Re:Let the directors decide. by QuasiEvil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, I'll argue those ethics.

      IT guy probably doesn't have the power to force the Beijing branch to do anything. His responsibility is to make sure that his superiors, who do have the power as well as the responsibility, are informed about the situation. The corporation is their charge, and if they fail to act, it's the corporation that will incur the risk.

      It'd be a whole different issue to me if the company was doing something that endangered people. In this situation, though, it's merely a calculated economic risk of decreased costs vs. the cost of getting caught.

    6. Re:Let the directors decide. by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not necessarily a moral matter. That's debatable. What it is, is a business matter. And if you're not authorized to make decisions about that business matter, it's fine to pass the buck to those who are.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    7. Re:Let the directors decide. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Why make the decision yourself?

      Perhaps he has to. He said he's the IT manager of a small company.

      Send an email to the directors just confirming this is what they wish to do and that they don't want you to take any action on this matter.

      It seems, by simply putting it in writing that might just put this small company in a sudden legal dilemma it wouldn't be otherwise if he just put his head down, shut up, and let it be. Yes, he won't be in trouble now, but assuming that he no power in the Beijing branch to begin with, it's not a situation he can really win anything by bringing it up to his superiors in such a big corporate manner for a small company. I don't see how a verbal talk to the superiors isn't just as good or better without forcing a decision (and possibly monetary expediture).

      Small companies are not like megacorps.

    8. Re:Let the directors decide. by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The IT guy could always play the role of whistleblower...give you one guess where that leads.

      I've spent years working around Asia and found the same thing, time and time again. Cracked software sits on servers and everyone helps themselves. Unless compliance officer is one of your titles, best tack is to stick to your specific job description.

      I worked at one company that seemed puzzled why I didn't bring my own copies - turned out they didn't have any English versions. You'd be surprised how quickly you get used to software that isn't in your own language.

    9. Re:Let the directors decide. by patro · · Score: 1

      One could (and I would) argue the ethics of allowing someone else to decide whether an immoral or illegal act should continue.

      The multinational companies do lots of immoral things themselves. Like providing software for dictators for financial gain.

      I'd say they should clean up their act first and then demand their users to do the same.

    10. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know a shit about how the legal system works, but as analogy if I witness an homicide and fail to report it I'm an accomplice of the killer (at least here). where is drawn the line between being an accomplice and safely passing the buck?

    11. Re:Let the directors decide. by DreamsAreOkToo · · Score: 4, Funny

      First things first,

      Make sure, that under no circumstances, that you post your situation to a popular internet site. That way you can be sure not to draw attention to your circumstances from the people who might investigate... ...oh wait one minute.

    12. Re:Let the directors decide. by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Passing the buck" is for cowards, no matter the direction

      I think the idea of "passing the buck" wasn't as cowardly as you make out.

      If you ask a superior verbally, and they say "we don't care and are happy for this to continue", then if the shit hits the fan they will plead ignorance.

      If you ask the superior to put it in writing that they are aware of the situation and are happy for it to continue, then the chances are higher that something will be done. It's not just passing the buck.

      cc'ing _their_ superior in the 'please confirm' email may get more response still, but may be a career limiting move.

    13. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the act is MORAL though ILLEGAL

    14. Re:Let the directors decide. by N1AK · · Score: 1

      To play Devil's advocate. Without knowing more about the situation it might be the case that if he says nothing it could cost him his job later. If the company is investigated and the piracy is found out, someone within the company is going to pay the price. Poster is at risk for two reasons: when investigating they may decide he almost certainly knew, when investigating they may decide that he should have known and was negligent.

      If he has a verbal conversation with a more senior manager who asks him to leave it alone, doing just that leaves him in a very vulnerable position. At the very least, if he is going to put nothing about the piracy in writing, he needs to ensure that the Chinese office is clearly outside of his remit.

    15. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      No, what stinks is the, "Dear Slashdot, in Nazi Germany I caught my boss littering. I hear littering is a big problem in Nazi Germany. Oh my, what should I do to stop this problem of littering in Nazi Germany?" attitude.

      Unless you have this irrational obsession with intellectual property (it's my idea, not yours! I thought of this string of bits first!), you might as well be writing an Ask Slashdot about how you noticed a group of your colleagues not giving the salute at the latest rally. I mean, it's company policy to give the salute, so all faithful employees should be saluting or they must lack some sort of pride in themselves and their technical work, right?

      OP, you may not realise it, but your attitude demonstrates everything required of a footsoldier in an authoritarian state. Somewhere, there is a petty bureaucrat's desk at a Party regional office with your name on it, ready for you to engage in your mammoth task of checking compliance on all the most irrelevant of details.

    16. Re:Let the directors decide. by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      If the company is investigated and the piracy is found out,

      Piracy investigation in China? In which world do you live?

    17. Re:Let the directors decide. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Plus you may have ethical beliefs that if one is not ready to pay for software, one should use OSS solutions instead of illegal ones.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    18. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily for you, this is illegal.

      But the idea that you should decide what is or is not immoral and then decide if it should continue is just your classic judge not lest ye be judged situation.

      No-one loves a tattle tail, least of all one who thinks he has a higher moral standing than everyone else.

    19. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't get the analogy quite correct. Nobody is recommending to not to pass the buck and fail to report. Your analogy would be closer to truth if you said:"I witnessed a homicide and reported it to the killers parents". Now that's passing the buck without actually doing the right thing.

    20. Re:Let the directors decide. by horza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a good analogy as homicide is a criminal offense and software piracy a civil offense. If you witness a homicide then you are under a legal obligation to report that directly to the police. If you see a fellow employee using a pirate copy of Photoshop you are not legally required to go to the police station and file a report on behalf of Adobe.

      In this case it seems passing the buck is the best thing to do. He's obviously not authorised to pay for authentic copies otherwise he would have done so. The people that are able have no desire to do so. All he can do is protect his reputation should there be an investigation, which is to show he competently audited the software under his jurisdiction and informed the people above of any missing licenses.

      Phillip.

    21. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... after posting on Slashdot about it? Haha

    22. Re:Let the directors decide. by robthebloke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We get more support requests for our software from China than from any other country - and we've never sold a single license there.

      If the people using the software have no qualms in contacting the developers directly, then it seems to be a fairly entrenched problem that's going to take an awful lot to stamp out. Whilst talking about this topic many people may think 'windows+office' the fact is that piracy is affecting every developer large and small (and I work for a small one). I applaud anyone who takes an interest in stamping the problem out at their office, though unfortunately it's not going anyway anytime soon...

    23. Re:Let the directors decide. by robthebloke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work for a small software company, we do not provide software to dictators, and we do not undertake any business that could even remotely be called immoral - and as a company we are heavily affected by piracy in China (where we have never sold a single license, and we receive continual support requests).

      Piracy doesn't just affect Microsoft and other multi-mationals, it affects every software single developer, big and small, working in every single corner of the world. You seem to be implying that it's OK to pick and choose which products you pirate - and for some reason you assume that you can be Judge, Jury and executioner when deciding if a company has involved itself in immoral activities - a decision that will be based on suspicion, or on implication (you're big, therefore must be immoral), but at no point would you ever have the full facts.

    24. Re:Let the directors decide. by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

      I really wish I had MOD points. Great reply!

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    25. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably took the best approach, depending on your situation. If you don't have the authority to make the decisions, rather than report it as a flagrant violation of company policies, allow the appropriate executives to think it through, discover, and make their own decisions. You've at least brought it to their attention without making accusations.

    26. Re:Let the directors decide. by Threni · · Score: 2, Informative

      > It's not a good analogy as homicide is a criminal offense and software piracy a civil offense.

      Depends where you are. In the UK, as well as loads of other countries, copyright infringement is a criminal offence.

    27. Re:Let the directors decide. by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "One could (and I would) argue the ethics of allowing someone else to decide whether an immoral or illegal act should continue. "Passing the buck" is for cowards,"

      And one could argue that it should follow "and there is nothing wrong with being a coward - all humans are born inequall"

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    28. Re:Let the directors decide. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily a moral matter. That's debatable. What it is, is a business matter.

      Two quotes:
      "The love of money is the root of all evil" - King James Bible

      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin, Foundation (Asimov)

      What do morals have to do with business?

    29. Re:Let the directors decide. by firewrought · · Score: 1

      It's not a good analogy as homicide is a criminal offense and software piracy a civil offense.

      Also, one is the abrupt, violent end of another person's existence and the other is a violation of an intangible and somewhat dubious property right. Your moral obligation to act as whistleblower is different between these two situations.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    30. Re:Let the directors decide. by sjames · · Score: 1

      However, seeing what the higher-ups will do is a great litmus test. They will either do the right thing because it is the right thing or demonstrate that they will only do the right thing when they fear being caught.

      If it proves to be the latter, it's time to re-evaluate your employment keeping in mind that they might well only do the right thing towards you if they fear some significant sanction otherwise. (Of course, their attitude might only extend to other businesses rather than people they come face to face with, but who knows?).

      The upshot is that the people who actually have the authority to correct the situation deserve the opportunity to do the right thing Trust but verify.

    31. Re:Let the directors decide. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a verbal talk to the superiors isn't just as good or better without forcing a decision...

      Except that a verbal talk is deniable. Or avoidable by the simple expedient of being on holiday or otherwise out of the office.

      A middle-manager needs to be able to cover his ass, and the only way to do that is in writing. Preferably with an accessible copy in case upper-management decide to shaft him.

      Been there, too many times. You can't trust anybody, but if you acquire a rep for playing it straight, and you don't take sides, you'll mostly be left alone to do your job.

    32. Re:Let the directors decide. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      If you want something to happen, try reporting the situation to the Beijing branch manager, and CC a higher-up of appropriate stature at the home office

      Did you even RTFS? That's exactly what he did.

      My response (CC'd to our CFO) was to ask for copies of all receipts and serial numbers for the software they're using. and see what happens.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    33. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why there are so many brick houses in China?

    34. Re:Let the directors decide. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Normally, I would suggest that this must be justified by the losses.

          Would the customer have purchased the software, if they could not have pirated it? In these cases, probably not. There is no loss, because the customer would not have paid if given no other choice.

          Now, if someone is selling illegally generated licenses, and the end user IS purchasing them, then there is a financial loss. The end user did intend to purchase, and they did pay for a license, so someone other than you was paid.

          In your case, assuming they are unpaid licenses by people unwilling to pay, there wouldn't normally be a financial loss. These licenses are generating support requests which are causing an additional workload, therefore a financial loss for you. You'll have to find a way to use this to your advantage, either through better licensing schemes, or only providing per-incident paid support.

          I've used software that must call home at every start. If they don't receive the appropriately encrypted message from the author's servers, they will not run. The bad part has been, what if the author no longer maintains their authentication server? Then the software that was paid for will no longer work. I can't remember which software did this to me, but it was annoying in that I liked it and had paid for it, but I could no longer use it.

          I miss the good old days, where I could buy a disk, use it, and the license was just a decoration in the box. Of course, those were the days when the Internet didn't exist for most people, and piracy was rather limited.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    35. Re:Let the directors decide. by Rasta_the_far_Ian · · Score: 1

      We get more support requests for our software from China than from any other country - and we've never sold a single license there.

      Just out of curiosity (since you didn't mention), is your product open source or closed source? If open source, do you charge for support?

      If your particular product (1) has a very high piracy rate,(2)is closed source, and (3) is sold mainly into 3rd world countries at prevailing market rates there, it may be worth open sourcing your product instead and charging for support.

    36. Re:Let the directors decide. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I work for a small software company, we do not provide software to dictators, and we do not undertake any business that could even remotely be called immoral - and as a company we are heavily affected by piracy in China (where we have never sold a single license, and we receive continual support requests).

      Not only could your practices be remotely called immoral, they frequently actually are called immoral. The morality of withholding source code and using copyright to constrain your users is certainly questioned. I'm not going to say that those practices are immoral, but to say that there isn't even the most remote question is simply misrepresenting reality.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    37. Re:Let the directors decide. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Actually the law varies quite wildly in compulsion to report laws. Ill cite the Las Vegas case of a person who watched a little girl get abducted and raped in a public bathroom, did not report, and was charged with nothing but the public's moral outrage.

      --
      Good-bye
    38. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know a shit about how the legal system works, but as analogy if I witness an homicide and fail to report it I'm an accomplice of the killer (at least here).

      I'm assuming you are not anywhere in the USA, because that's not how it works here.
      You are NOT required to report activity you know, think, or suspect is illegal. Now if you ended up on a witness stand as a defendant, a jury might ask why you kept your mouth shut, so generally it IS in your best interests to report such an event.

      But since this article is about a civil, not a criminal matter, that makes this even more of a grey area. If the worker is not some type of manager/executive, compliance officer, etc. then he might never have any problems (legally) by staying quiet.

      But I approach things like this from a cover-my-own-ass point of view. Notify a superior who IS qualified to address the issue, and then let it go.

    39. Re:Let the directors decide. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      None of those arguments are ethical arguments, they are hedonistics based on meta-ethical assumptions and ignorance of US law. Do you think that when the IRS comes in that he needs do anything but say "I didn't know?" - oh except for that email that shows he did.

      What's more, China is the obviously the ethically progressive country in an acceptance of pirating, as the issue of copyright is ethically unsound. This will probably change as China becomes the dominant technological country. The greater good has nothing to do with it.

      Even Open Source is seen (rightly) as an attack on copyright, with the caveat that using the rules of an unethical system to advance to an ethical state is optimal for the community (not everyone is a purist) and results in an inevitable (moral) good. Talk to RMS, I don't care about the greater good and I don't believe in OS, as a stopgap. Your morals may vary.

      Ask yourself, if the only way that an obscure subsystem (that your job depended on) would work, is if you used an old pirated version of 3rd party software, would you quit or do nothing (if given no other choice)?

      It's a fundamental question that obviates most people's relativism. In large, you will see a whole lot of nothing. Everyone's moral fiber is STRONG in what they actually believe, they just don't have the morals they say they do on forums.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    40. Re:Let the directors decide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can say that Chinese people will shit a brick when it comes to potentially pissing off a higher-up in the States.

      Funny.
      As someone living in Sweden, I'd like to point out that our American and Canadian braches have employees that will shit bricks if they do something deemed wrong by their Swedish overlords.
      It has something to do with pictures of people from North America passing out around midnight on a typical wekday party night when everyone else stays up drinking until 5am, only to be at work 8:30am the next day.

    41. Re:Let the directors decide. by Corbets · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go WAY over the top in a comparison here: if you're a soldier ordered to, oh, shoot some civilians who are refusing to leave a building where the enemy soldiers are, do you shoot them? What if you're ordered to shoot prisoners?

      Whether this is a moral or legal matter can indeed be debated; however, at no point in time should we as free-thinking human beings ever hide behind the curtain of "authorization". To do so is to implicitly reject the notion of freedom and its inherent responsibilities.

    42. Re:Let the directors decide. by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      That's called an "illegal order" for one thing, and you're /not/ authorized to follow them. You are, in fact, required to refuse and, if necessary, arrest your commanding officer.

      Milgram's experiment is too fresh in my mind to disagree with your general point, but let me say this: I don't have much of an opinion on whether piracy is, in general, immoral. I definitely have an opinion in specific cases, and it can go both ways. There's so much to consider that I'm not sure I'll ever have an opinion, but I do get sick of simple-minded arguments like STEALING IS WRONG or ZOMG GREEDY CORPORATIONS.

      Rhetoric aside, downloading an unauthorized copy of some software is /not/ the same as stealing a tangible good (http://i.justrealized.com/2008/08/27/why-piracy-is-not-theft/). That doesn't mean it can't also be wrong, but it is absurd to class them together blindly.

      If I don't have a moral opinion, it becomes a [serious] business matter, and I delegate it to those who are responsible for such decisions. If I were that person, I'd buy it because and only because it makes good business sense to run a legit shop.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  3. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    Bit late now you've already started investigating though.

    --
    Nick
    1. Re:See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wilful ignorance is not a defense.

    2. Re:See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil by B2382F29 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reading slashdot from china at the moment I can verify it is definitely NOT banned. You might want to use another DNS server though (e.g. from OpenDNS) as the DNS requests tend to take longer if you use the DNS servers of the chinese providers.

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
  4. You're too small to be on their radar by stevejsmith · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At least in Romania, where piracy is also widespread, the only companies at risk from these sorts of things are large companies owned by politically-involved people. Prosecutions for software piracy are often pretexts for some other political offense. If you're just a small design shop, I don't see how it would benefit any bureaucrat to come after you.

    1. Re:You're too small to be on their radar by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Sooooo, the fact that he (or his company) doesn't need to worry about potential lawsuits or prosecution means that the company shouldn't want to correct the situation anyway? Is the risk of getting caught the only thing that keeps people following laws?

    2. Re:You're too small to be on their radar by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      Not everyone sees upholding intellectual property monopolies as a moral duty.

  5. A few things come to mind by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) you speak to someone who has the power to set things right educting them on the legal risks and possible get a cookie. 2) You do as above but use this as a chance to push open source software, it's free and legal so why not use it? 3) you keep your mouth shut and just hope no one ever tells on the company. 4) blackmail (for money if you want to be simple 5) keep it in mind if they threaten to lay you off due to budget issues. Nothing like having something on the boss (see above) All these are pretty sound options, well save maybe blackmail for cash.

    1. Re:A few things come to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes sir, it's called The GIMP... It's free!"

      That's a pitch I never want to have to make.

    2. Re:A few things come to mind by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      That's a pitch I never want to have to make.

      Why not? Sure, it doesn't do everything in the same way as Photoshop, but there's no reason why it should. It certainly does, however, perform most (if not all, with 3rd-party scripts) of the same functions.

      I know this will go against the grain with the fanboys, but I learned to use Gimp long before PS, and I still use it by preference even though I now have both available to me.

  6. Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are better off suggesting Open Office and Free PDF software; rather than fighting piracy.

    I used to work at a multi-national company; and I used to be amazed at the amount of self-imposed lock-ins created by IT staff in Western branches (I am based in India). Routine inter office correspondence happens using 'advanced' features in Exchange and Word which work only on the Windows platform. I always felt plain text and HTML suffices for any and all communication requirements.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I always felt plain text and HTML suffices for any and all communication requirements.

      I feel that way now, although I would either severely restrict the HTML (to facilitate WYSIWYG editing), or use ODF.

      But I'm curious -- did you actually get that multi-national company to use any open standards, or are they still doing Exchange and Word? I'm going to guess that buying the Office licenses will be cheaper, for many organizations like this, at least in the short term.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are better off suggesting Open Office and Free PDF software; rather than fighting piracy."

      Pretty much my policy, only I take it beyond suggestion and refuse to install unlicensed software on my own workstation as a matter of principle to send a message in the company. This matter is not just a topic for international offices either, it's commonplace in the States. Small companies on a tight budget would rather life $5K worth of software from a "friend" than shell out the capital expenditure because they can get away with it.

      But I refuse. Open Office, Dia, Gimp, Thunderbird, putty and a handful of other Windows goodies are all I need to be productive, and it shows the senior executives that it is neither necessary to pirate software they think they need, nor even to pay for expensive commercial software with viable FOSS alternatives readily available.

    3. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It seems that his Beijing offices are hell bent on using the MS software anyways as they no doubt already know of OSS products.

      That being said, he should probably just nip this in the butt, buy the licenses needed and ship them to the office. It's only 5 systems and corporate can probably transfer the billing or invoice them anyways. Even if they don't, it's the same company so bitching about a branch office not doing something they aren't prepared to do is a little hypocritical.

      It's really in the company's best interest this way anyways. Being the same company or operating as the same company (IE branch office), if there is an audit, the parent company can still be liable for their actions. 5 licenses to cover everything needed on the workstations shouldn't be too over costly or they aren't making enough money to use proprietary software in the first place.

    4. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by jkrise · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But I'm curious -- did you actually get that multi-national company to use any open standards, or are they still doing Exchange and Word?

      I tried, but failed badly. I was with them from 1996 to 2002; and in late 2000, the MNC entered into an alliance with Microsoft globally, to use Windows and other Microsoft products. Initially I joined them to set up an SGI-based development network on IRIX and OGL; this was disbanded in 2002 and I quit.

      My impression is that in many Western economies, the pricing for Microsoft products isn't that big a deal; so people tend to think of it as a problem that will disappear if they can throw some money at it. But on Server products, things got very expensive and complicated with Craptive Directory and Exchange 5.5; so many Directory Service Replication errors, and a nightmare for the sysadmins. It's like a treadmill... we need to keep running (upgrading) but seldom move forward.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    5. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Nip in the bud. Sorry to correct you on this, but I thought you'd want to know that it wasn't "butt."

    6. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by lokedhs · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As an interesting side-note, the only time I receieved OpenOffice documents from a client was from an Indian customer.

      I have to admit I smiled a bit with joy when that happened. :-)

    7. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a second, I thought you meant slap on the butt, and I thought "Wait a minute, that comment belongs in the Superbowl story!"

    8. Re:Given it'smostly MS Office and PDF stuff.... by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the occasional viral effect caused by receiving a document in the latest MS Office format which does nothing useful except force people to upgrade just to maintain compatibility.

  7. The company's policy by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My response (CC'd to our CFO) was to ask for copies of all receipts and serial numbers for the software they're using. and see what happens.

    Can you request that from that branch only, and ask nothing from other branches? I'd think the manager would be seriously upset if you in such an open, unambiguous way declare him a pirate.

    A better way, IMO, would be to set up a company-wide policy of keeping track of all software, all licenses and all computers. You need that anyway, just to know what you have, where, and what can be reused, and such. To implement that you, of course, need scans of receipts and licenses, serial numbers, codes or whatever is needed to install and use, along with some notes on what license governs the s/w (such as whether it can be moved from one box to another, etc.) This way when a computer is decommissioned you know what was on it and what can be salvaged. Tools like ManageSoft and HP CM do this, and there are other (free and not.) And when Boy Scouts of America kick the doors in you have all the receipts (that they insist upon!) to prove that you are not guilty, this time.

    That assumes that your job makes you responsible for licensing compliance. If not, maybe you should not bother.

    1. Re:The company's policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      now tell me please how tracking the legality of software used in the company creates any added value ? I mean the job of tracking licences and other legal shit is completely useless work that noone is interested in. It only becomes an issue if you are going to get sued for using pirated software which appears not to be the case in china so who cares ....

    2. Re:The company's policy by tftp · · Score: 1
    3. Re:The company's policy by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thankfully the BSA cannot 'kick your door down'. Unless they get a warrant and police cooperation simply refuse to let them on your premises. This is in your best interests even if you ARENT engaged in pirating software.

      1) Some policies are lax enough that any boob in the company could install an unauthorized copy of . In which case you have licensing violations despite any and all attempts at 'good faith' to keep track of this.

      2) The BSA presents a security risk for any small company in the fact that they are not looking out after YOUR INTERESTS but rather those big companies like Microsoft/Adobe/whatever... It could very well be that they engage in corporate espionage and steal your code and/or ideas while they are there.

      3) If they do find licensing problems and/or piracy they will insist (blackmail) you into putting some software on your machines that will report all your used software to the BSA. This makes it easier for them to get police cooperation and warrants in the future. This is also a security risk since such stuff is proprietary, you cannot audit the source code and basically makes unauthorized connections to the outside world (they could still steal information from your network this way too).

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    4. Re:The company's policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you request that from that branch only, and ask nothing from other branches? I'd think the manager would be seriously upset if you in such an open, unambiguous way declare him a pirate.

      That's like Nikita Khrushchev calling Milton Friedman a capitalist pig.

      Software piracy in China is so brazenly overt and culturally entrenched that the insult will completely fail to translate.

    5. Re:The company's policy by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Risk management, in at least 3 spheres:

      1. Risk of being sued (low risk)
      2. Risk of public humiliation and loss of reputation(low risk)
      3. Risk of data loss due to malware infected pirated software, or compromise due to lack of security updates (medium risk)

      You have to do a risk analysis of possible and probable monetary losses from these events and your guessed likelyhood of the outcome, and act accordingly. Risk analysis is a major part of how a business works.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
  8. Counter Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, I know for a fact people in china do occasionally buy software, but I work in an industry where you would be very hard pressed to pirate software.
    Besides, even the Chinese don't want planes falling out of the sky, and it comes with a nice support contract.

    I would ask, are they breaking any local laws and can it come back to byte you in the future.

  9. Set a policy and enforce it by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Create a written IT policy for hardware and software. Make sure everyone knows what it is. Create a business ethics policy and ensure that components of it address using unlicensed software. Make sure that your employees are trained on these policies and that a record of training goes into their employee file. If the employees violate the policy, warn them in writing and file the notice in their HR record. If they violate the policy again, fire them. If they want to keep their job, they will fall into line and stop exposing the company to unnecessary legal risk.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Set a policy and enforce it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      That solution is culturally as American as apple pie, and something like that is doomed to failure in a place like China. People don't even understand that you're supposed to buy software licenses, that you can't just copy and paste other websites onto your own, and so on.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Set a policy and enforce it by MooUK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That phrase has never made much sense. Apple pie isn't especially american.

    3. Re:Set a policy and enforce it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they violate a written and signed by them company policy that means they become fully liable for the damages the company might have to pay for using pirated software.
      If you push it through seriously, it should work fine a (partial) legal CYA.

    4. Re:Set a policy and enforce it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's rather amusing for me to read things like this (and many other posts here). Speaking as a European working in China, I guess if you enact such policy nothing at all will change. And if you actually manage to find out they are still doing it, you'd have to fire the whole office. Perhaps decide to move your company out of China instead, it would be more easy. Otherwise you keep having to fight people trying to circumvent the system.

      If you want to sell your fish in Rome, do as the Romans do.

    5. Re:Set a policy and enforce it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Idiom: A speech form or an expression of a given language that is peculiar to itself grammatically or cannot be understood from the individual meanings of its elements.

      It's an idiom, it's not supposed to make sense. Durrr.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Set a policy and enforce it by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      That solution is culturally as American as apple pie, and something like that is doomed to failure in a place like China. People don't even understand that you're supposed to buy software licenses, that you can't just copy and paste other websites onto your own, and so on.

      You're right. I'm an American and that's an American management perspective that I expressed. I disagree with your assertion that this would be doomed to failure. Not every problem can be solved, but many problems can be reduced in severity, which is the purpose in this situation. I realize that there is no way to fully prevent someone from using pirated software within the office. Even if one were to lock down the desktops, use thin clients, or replace all software with free and/or open source software, someone could always bring a computer into the office and bypass any measures that have been put into place.

      The goal of establishing the policies and training is not only to prevent use of pirated software, but to establish a guideline for what is and is not acceptable behavior. Without a policy, the employee will not know what is expected of them, and the company will appear to either encourage piracy or be indifferent to it. Both of these will reflect poorly on the company should legal action be taken against them for using pirated software. By having the policy, and ensuring that employees know and understand the policy, much of the burden of the piracy is placed on the employee. Instead of not knowing what is expected of them, the employee is now aware that using pirated software is not acceptable behavior. If they continue to do it, they will be aware that there might be consequences if they are caught. Meanwhile, the company can prove that they have taken reasonable measures to eliminate the use of pirated software which could reduce the risk they might have to bear if an employee breaks the law.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  10. why do you care? by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless your job is legal compliance or you own a lot of Microsoft stock, why bother with this?

    1. Re:why do you care? by powerspike · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because it's illegal to pirate software, maybe if you took it seriously there wouldn't be 5000 people out of jobs...
      I know, how about we give them your phone number, and you can explain it to them?

    2. Re:why do you care? by daveime · · Score: 3, Informative

      America != World.

      In some developing countries, software piracy is not considered illegal. In Russia, which is not a signatory to the Berne Convention it is legal to copy any software as long as it is not in the Russian language.

      So what strawman will you choose next I wonder ?

    3. Re:why do you care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is like feeling sorry for Stormtroopers who work for the dark side. Slashdot is home of the Jedi Knights. You must be new here.

    4. Re:why do you care? by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      bullshit, it's illegal to copy any copyrighted software in russia.. the only question is will you get punished for doing this or not. this happens because copyright law can be enforced only by owner of such software registered within RU itself. so if say, adobe, has no representation in russian federation, then this just cannot be prosecuted by russian law (no intl treaties, correct, but this can and will change), because law clearly states that only copyright holder can protect their property.
      IANAL, but this is how this works in RU.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    5. Re:why do you care? by cj1127 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That "it's someone else's problem" attitude utterly stinks. My guess is that the guy actually *cares* about the reputation of his company and takes pride in its work, which might be a novel concept to some people. Like it or not, software piracy is illegal; the fact that you have an axe to grind about Microsoft doesn't detract from that

    6. Re:why do you care? by asb · · Score: 1

      When BSA selects them for auditing, the IT-manager will get the heat, because software licenses are his responsibility.

      He bothers because he is paid for it.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    7. Re:why do you care? by grcumb · · Score: 1

      In some developing countries, software piracy is not considered illegal. In Russia, which is not a signatory to the Berne Convention it is legal to copy any software as long as it is not in the Russian language.

      Erm, careful. I live in a country that hasn't ratified the Berne Conventions on Copyright, but that only protects the vendors downtown who copy every application and movie they can get their hands on.

      If you install software, you generally have to agree to the terms of the license before you get going. Contract law does exist in nearly every jurisdiction, and EULA's are (arguably) widely enforceable.

      At least, that was the argument that Microsoft made when they paid a visit to the government a couple of years back. It was compelling enough that the government sat down and negotiated a blanket license agreement with them.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    8. Re:why do you care? by seifried · · Score: 3, Informative
    9. Re:why do you care? by Jeoh · · Score: 2, Funny

      These are not the licences you're looking for.

    10. Re:why do you care? by tftp · · Score: 1

      That "it's someone else's problem" attitude utterly stinks. My guess is that the guy actually *cares* about the reputation of his company and takes pride in its work, which might be a novel concept to some people.

      Let me comment on this from devil's advocate position: "caring about the reputation" is not necessarily advantageous to the company. Rambus did really well, all lies and omissions considered, though in the human society they'd be riding a rail, with free tar and feathers provided. Mortgage industry did a good job (for themselves) by causing the housing bubble, even though it destroys the country as we speak. Companies just have no morals.

      In an unconstrained situation a company would be better off if it steals every piece of software that it can get away with. The constraint here is a legal threat of ruin if this is discovered. Many smaller companies, especially in Asia, run their business on pirated software because they can - and savings can be immense if they forget to pay their dues to expensive software's owners, like Autodesk and Dassault Systèmes and Ansys and Mentor Graphics (if they are into engineering.)

      In the situation that the poster describes, chances of MS or Adobe auditing a small office somewhere in China are vanishingly small. So it can be understood why nobody in the company (except the poster) really cares - they are not likely to be caught for this kind of theft; in worst case the Chinese manager will be punished locally. The trouble begins when an eager IT manager starts digging, sending emails and ultimately posting on /. - that creates so much evidence against the officers of the company that they have no convenient cover story any more. Now they will have to act, and they may be not pleased with that. The IT manager can be pushed out, one way or another, over this - just for doing his job honestly.

      Businesses are often like that - concepts of pride, trust, honor that people maintain are not really applicable to them. Businesses exist only to make money, and the employees are supposed to only do what they are told. This IT manager should understand very well that he is raising a political wave within the company, and he needs to see if this wave is positively accepted by People Who Matter. Because if not he will be out of there real quick, even if he is 100% right (as he seems to be.)

    11. Re:why do you care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But tomorrow it all ends! Stock up today! :p

      Seriously on that note, the WIPO Copyright Treaty comes into effect tomorrow (05/02/2009) in Russia.

    12. Re:why do you care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if you go through life actually believing what you've just posted, you're either a sociopath or someone who is going to end up a sociopath's bitch.

      There are people, and no doubt companies, that do behave in the manner you suggest. You can spot the difference between them and criminals by the fact that they haven't been caught yet. But generally people, even when grouped into profit making companies, do not act like some fiscal unit in the economic model of an uber laissez faire fantasist. We are both considerably more complicated and more ethical than that.

    13. Re:why do you care? by QuantumG · · Score: 0

      it's illegal to copy any copyrighted software in russia..

      That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    14. Re:why do you care? by daveime · · Score: 1

      That'll teach me to use out of date references :-(

      http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Software_piracy/

    15. Re:why do you care? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      You know, if you go through life actually believing what you've just posted, you're either a sociopath or someone who is going to end up a sociopath's bitch.

      So... a manager or an employee then?

    16. Re:why do you care? by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      ugh, my information is outdated too.. quick search in wiki reveals that RU in fact signed Berne Convention in 1995-03-13, so perhaps it's enforceable from other contries too..
      before that copyright violation were prosecuted as I described - only local company offices in RU can enforce laws
      didn't check a while because in about 3-4 years our company started to use legal only because there were a lot of lawsuits

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    17. Re:why do you care? by againjj · · Score: 1

      While other replies have noted that Russia is a Berne signatory, they do not notice that there are others that are not. Laos, for example, not only is not a signatory, but does not have any type of copyright law whatsoever, despite a recent treaty with the US saying that they will create one. As a result, those producing content and competing in the marketplace (literally -- the content creator and a "pirate" could be facing each other across the same walkway) have to do so on quality -- basically, if it is sold by the content creator, then the buyer knows the CD is of high quality and will work the first time and for a long time. Oh, and the price has to be close to what the others charge (say, $1.20 instead of $1.00), or the buyer won't give a damn about quality.

    18. Re:why do you care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight! you are making problems for other people, over nothing. Get back to work you moral son-of-a-bitch.

  11. Let me go out on a limb . . . by lawnsprinkler · · Score: 0, Insightful

    . . . and suggest that you ask whoever is responsible for your company's legal affairs in China to address this. I'd assume that your company has an attorney that's familiar with the law there.

    Considering the answer to your question obviously lies there, I'm prone to believe that this scenario is made up to promote an "anti-piracy" agenda on this site.

  12. I suppose, when in Rome... by kkrajewski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not like they're going to be caught and prosecuted. Although if possible, why not go for a FOSS solution? Personally I do tend to try to compensate people who write cool software that I use.

    Ocassionally I get emails from Chinese users asking for a serial for one of our products. I asked one if there was not an accessible store from which to purchase it. He responded, basically, yeah, there's a couple, but no one buys software in China, they just download it. So there you have it!

    Sadly we're not popular enough for anyone to have made a keygen that I can find.

    1. Re:I suppose, when in Rome... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Sadly we're not popular enough for anyone to have made a keygen that I can find.

      Just give me a link to your software and I will fix that for you :)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:I suppose, when in Rome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although if possible, why not go for a FOSS solution?

      Because nothing FOSS provides compares to Adobe Creative Suite. There isn't, in fact, an open source alternative to every single piece of software.

    3. Re:I suppose, when in Rome... by bruno.fatia · · Score: 1

      Sadly we're not popular enough for anyone to have made a keygen that I can find.

      Maybe you don't know where to look...

  13. I'd go the other way, personally by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd say trying to get some people in a third-world country to pay rich American monopolists extra money is an immoral act.

    1. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      China is third world? you must be a stupid amelican.

    2. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China's Communist, and therefore second-world by definition.

    3. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd say trying to get some people in a third-world country to pay rich American monopolists extra money is an immoral act.

      Maybe we should stop paying for Chinese goods? Because obviously some factory boss in China is getting rich off of his exploited workers.

      Besides, besides Windows it's hard to argue that any software company has an absolute monopoly.

    4. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Normally I would agree with you, but you do realize that the US has this gigantic trade deficit with China, don't you? Maybe you could be more clear about who is the rich and who is the poor guy here.

    5. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by xstonedogx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Classifying Chinese working for a branch office of an American design company in Beijing as "some people in a third-world country" is more than a bit disingenuous. Also please consider that the money to be spent also belongs to another American corporation (design, so presumably a monopolist as well) not those people in China.

    6. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China is a Capitalist Authoritarian Dictatorship. You know, like the US tried in South America in the 70's/80's.

    7. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just like China cant possibly have cyber criminals because their only a developing nation.

    8. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't China a 2nd world country?

    9. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      And there he is folks.....

      F.Y.I, It's now Immoral to pirate software.....

      Oh well, eventually every pot gets a crack....

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    10. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And if the whole point of off-shoring work to an office in China is because it's cheaper, are these hidden costs factored in?

      [Disclaimer: my project was recently off-shored to China.]

    11. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Normally I would agree with you, but you do realize that the US has this gigantic trade deficit with China, don't you? Maybe you could be more clear about who is the rich and who is the poor guy here.

      List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita
      China, People's Republic of: $5,325, rank: 100
      United States: rank: $45,725, rank: 6

      Clear enough?

    12. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean, American companies sell Chinese products in US for eight times the price they paid in China?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    13. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe? Google Earth? Anyway, the OP was talking about pirated Microsoft products, so if Windows has a monopoly as you already agree with, the guy you answered to actually has a good point. Use a currency converter and compare the price of software like MSOffice with the average (or median) monthly sailaries of people in other countries.

        I'd go so far and say that in some countries like China, India or, say, Ukraine it is even morally OBLIGATORY to pirate software unless you are in a position that allows you to switch to GNU/Linux. Or do you think the companies there should withdraw the cost of software from the salaries of their employees? Negative salary anyone...hello?

    14. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, besides Windows...

      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

    15. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Well if everything costs like 1/10th of what it costs in America then China is about equal with the US... Remember GDP isnt the show stopper, its cost of living as well.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    16. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Maybe we should stop paying for Chinese goods?" Uh, I think we're already doing that. And just to be Democratic about it, we've stopped buying everyone else's as well. You might have noticed the global slowdown and other countries blaming the U.S. They are correct, the U.S. people are officially tapped out, spent, broke, going back to basics and saving their money. And the rest of the world is livid about it.

      Gerry

    17. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by fork_daemon · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes. As an example. In Mumbai, India there is a place to buy Brand New Original Computer Hardware for cheap. These are called grey markets. I once bought a Seagate Harddrive for INR 3000/- The Price tag on the Disk read, INR 8000/- Now they are many people who have made enough profits before selling that disk to me.

      But in US and Europe, people usually end up paying the Final Price. Ofcourse, it includes Shipping costs,but still you do get it with huge profits in the pockets of the American Corporates.

      For people from this side of the globe a small profit is a big thing. But the equivalent profit in First world countries ends up being negligible.

    18. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that China was much closer to communism than corporatism or fascism. Then again, the bottom line is freedom (meaning human rights), and under all three of those models freedom is considered the enemy.

    19. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Well if everything costs like 1/10th of what it costs in America then China is about equal with the US... Remember GDP isnt the show stopper, its cost of living as well.

      Duh. That's why I referred to the "purchasing power parity" list. The plain GDP per capita list is higher.

    20. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by patiodragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "China, People's Republic of: $5,325, rank: 100

      United States: rank: $45,725, rank: 6

      Clear enough?"

      No, not clear. While you may or may not be making a valid point, giving absolute values of income does nothing to tell you the standard of living, which is what would really determine if someone was "rich" or not. Where I live in the US, the average price of a home has probably dropped back down to about a million dollars. You can't rent a room for less than 1,000/month. While there may be a difference in the average standard of living, I don't think it is in proportion to the dollar values you cite. So, no, it is not clear at all.

    21. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually the classification went on like this:
      1. First world: America and direct allies (NATO).
      2. Second world: Soviet Union and direct allies (Warsaw pact).
      3. Third world: underdeveloped countries, including China as it did not stay an ally of the USSR for long (in case you are too young: it was actually an ally of the US in the cold war).
      4. Fourth world: newly developed former third-world countries (Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia), which usually got rich finding oil under their asses and keeping foreigners from stealing it.

      This is a cold-war-era classification, but "third world" has become such a common way of saying "poor country" that it stuck. However, Mao Zedong had its own classification, in which China was still in the third world:

      1. First world: the superpowers, i.e. USA and USSR;
      2. Second world: the superpowers' satellites, i.e. most of Europe, South America, Africa, and Oceania;
      3. Third world: independent countries, among which China.
      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    22. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>the U.S. people are officially tapped out, spent, broke, going back to basics and saving their money. And the rest of the world is livid about it.

      Good. It's time for Americans to learn to save money, and prepare for their retirement years, rather than spend, spend, spend. I'm glad I saved my money. I have around 300,000 dollars socked away, and therefore I'm in good shape even though I was laid off. If I had been like the typical American, with around 100 grand in debt, I'd be screwed.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    23. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      The numbers cited are at 'purchasing power parity' - that is, they are adjusted for the fact that many things are just more expensive in rich countries. They aren't just raw dollar numbers, which I agree would give a misleading impression. In dollar terms, the difference between the US and China is much greater.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    24. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by evanism · · Score: 1

      Sir, I think you are too enamored with your overweening confidence in your countries future.

      While many here think China is a bit of a scoundrel for ripping off an aggressive price gouging monopolist, many would also remember that your Chinese Friends hold many many trillion dollars in US Treasuries, and should they yank them back home (or sell into Euros) in order to keep their country "afloat" then I'm afraid your skiting will look folly.

      GDP of 5k vs 45k looks large, but all those schooled in Marco economics might advise you that debt can kill nations faster than any civil war.

      A civil tongue might serve you well, our friend.

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    25. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jabithew · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You are so wrong it's impossible to believe.

      Firstly, the European Left has been talking shit about America for so long it's not believable. It doesn't mean they'll actually do anything. And they represent less than or equal to 50% of the European populace. Not all of the left is rabidly anti-American either (see Labour for example).

      Secondly, Europe does not have an integrated foreign policy. Even if the President of Europe did want to declare war on America (highly unlikely, see first point) it would merely be a polite request. I can't see them persuading anyone except maybe France of the need to invade America.

      Lastly, politicians here are blaming America for the financial crisis as it is a convenient escape route to cover their own mismanagement (the only European economy without its own weaknesses is Germany, and Germany is still probably over-exporting). Do not mistake what our leaders say for either popular opinion or the truth.

      In fact, my prediction is that with the current left-ward shift in America and right-ward shift in Europe, along with significant agreements on many issues (e.g. Iran), I'd say that the transatlantic alliance is likely to be stronger in the future, not weaker.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    26. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a Capitalist Authoritarian Dictatorship.

      You know, like the US tried in South America in the 70's/80's.

      Also like the US tried in North America in the 00's.

    27. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by aj50 · · Score: 1

      Possibly true but not as a direct result of the numbers given.

      GDP (PPP) is adjusted based on the costs of living in that country.

      See also:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    28. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by yada21 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have around 300,000 dollars socked away, and therefore I'm in good shape even though I was laid off. If I had been like the typical American, with around 100 grand in debt, I'd be screwed.

      Just wait. when they decide to inflate all the debt away you're saving's wont be worth anything either. you'll wish you spent it on fast cars and loose women and gambling or even just wasted it. At least you'd have some memory's.

      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    29. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      * When
      * your
      * savings
      * You'll
      * won't
      * fast cars, loose women and gambling
      * memories

    30. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I consider myself a member of the English left. I am vastly more leftwing than the current Labour government we have.

      I do not blame the US for the current recession. I blame the bankers who lent money they did not have and our own government for letting us become to dependant on the financial services industry. I think almost everyone I talk to feels pretty similar.

      I certainly have not heard anyone blaming the US as you were in recession long before us.

      As for Europe going to war with the US that is just pie in the sky fantasy of some nutter american. There is no way anyone in Europe would support such a war. We have had too many wars on our own shores. After world war two we had to rebuild almost every city to some extent, we have no desire to repeat this. Another war of the scale the original poster talked about would almost certainly degenerate into a nuclear conflict. Only someone who had never seen their own country levelled would even consider such a conflict ever starting, so unless the US choose to invade us its not going to happen. The US is unlikely to ever invade since despite the occasional disagreement, we are actually on pretty good terms.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    31. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by pcolaman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Let's not even forget the fact that both France and Germany as of late have actually had stronger relations with the US since their respective new President and Chancellor have been voted into office. Ironically, both governments are more conservative than our own now.

    32. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by pcolaman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Correction, I forgot that the Chancellor is not voted into office, but chosen instead by the President in the case of Germany. But now I'm just splitting hairs.

    33. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Jesus, where the fuck do you live? Dropped back down to about a million dollars? Probably California, land of the pretentious idiots. My parents bought their 2500 sq ft house back when housing prices were at their highest here, and it cost $230,000. And it's in a great neighborhood at that. I always laugh when I see the house flipping shows where people buy a house in California that looks like a monkey shit all over it for like $800,000, when I could buy a small mansion here (or in most areas) for that amount.

    34. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "Clear enough?"

      Those are old numbers, from when they still believed in the illusion of their fantasy economics. In reality the US owes so much money that they are technically bankrupt. Nobody is interested in bankrupting them, so they will probably get the time to dig them out of the whole - but don't kid yourself the US owes China a TON of money.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    35. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, it's up to politicians to choose which products' prices to use when establishing that ratio. The easiest way to skew it is to include some typical American products that are unpopular or rare (and therefore disproportionately expensive) abroad.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    36. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jonadab · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > I can't see them persuading anyone except maybe France of the need to invade America.

      You've got it backwards. France doesn't invade other countries. France gets invaded *by* other countries. Though, when the US invaded France, it was in cooperation with the French, so I'm not sure that really counts.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    37. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has an absolute monopoly in software, but more than just MS's Windows qualify as pretty damned close.

      Take CS, as the OP mentioned. No serious competitor exists.

    38. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by russotto · · Score: 1

      While many here think China is a bit of a scoundrel for ripping off an aggressive price gouging monopolist, many would also remember that your Chinese Friends hold many many trillion dollars in US Treasuries, and should they yank them back home (or sell into Euros) in order to keep their country "afloat" then I'm afraid your skiting will look folly.

      What do you mean "yank them back home"? There's no put option on those things. If they sell them for Euros, they drive down the dollar with respect to the Euro, screwing themselves (because they hold all those dollar-denominated securities) in the bargain.

    39. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      By pirating the software is where the crossed the line. If they actually felt that strongly about giving these companies money they would use Alternate software. OpenSource, Locally made, etc... Pirating just says Hey I love your software I find it value. But I will steel it other then legally owning it.
      Ethics is a thin line. Go to far in either direction then you are off it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    40. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by makapuf · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Just so you know, massive demonstrations in France in the last few days showed that France state of mind != French president for now.

      IIRC, the popularity rate of french president is 41% favorable opinions.

      The general population is not closer of US despite the new president but thanks to him. Bush was and always remained very unliked (apart from the president).

    41. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jonadab · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > I consider myself a member of the English left.

      England is more friendly with the US than some of the other countries in Europe, however.

      Not that any of them are ready to go to *war* with us or anything, but politically there are some countries in Europe that just sort of don't look our way with much favor, if you know what I'm saying.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    42. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they weren't stolen goods?

      The profit margins on computer hardware can be quite low.

      --
    43. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the "thinking power parity" list looks like ;).

      --
    44. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > You mean, American companies sell Chinese products in US for eight times the price they paid in China?

      I think Pier 1 Imports does something like that...

      But in any case exchange rates don't necessarily track closely with purchasing power, and even if they did, purchasing power considers the collection of goods most people buy, but which of those goods are the cheapies and which ones are the big-ticket items varies from one country to another, sometimes quite significantly. That's why trade is so advantageous in the first place.

      In Cameroon, mangoes are cheap, when they're in season. Uber-poor people, like, say, the children of subsistence farmers, eat them for breakfast. Where I live, a single fresh mango costs more than a two-pound bag of rice, which would feed the Cameroonian child for a fortnight. But they can't afford rice for breakfast. Sometimes they might get it for supper. The relative costs of things are not necessarily the same from one country to another.

      So just because imports get marked way up from one country to another doesn't necessarily imply anything particular about the economic relationship between the two countries.

      You're also missing the fact that the US is not importing only from China. We have trade relations with most of the countries on the planet. It's a pretty connected world these days.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    45. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jonadab · · Score: 1

      You missed the fact that he was listing the GDPs according to Purchasing Power Parity, not in exchange-rate terms. In other words, while what you point out is true as far as it goes, he had already corrected for it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    46. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Who is trying to get them to pay? I thought he was trying to get them to stop using it.

      If the idiots in the third-world country want to use it, maybe they should pay for it or develop a non-backward country and create some useful software themselves?

      You almost got me to feel bad for the "third-world people" but then i remembered they thought it was a good idea to destroy their intellectuals when they made the great leap forward....

    47. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you could by a mansions in Iowa or wherever for 200k, but then you'd have to live there. More desirable places cost more.

      Enjoy living in Hicksville.

    48. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) per capita is a measure of how rich the average citizen is relative to their local cost of living. It is like GDP per capita, but it takes into consideration the varying costs of goods and (mostly) services across borders.

      For example, a haircut may cost far less in a country with a smaller GDP per capita because there is an adequate supply of hairstylists willing to work for a lower wage than in, say, the USA. So the average citizen in China may make less, but they also pay less for some services. Economists capture this effect with the PPP adjustment to GDP per capita; the idea is that you can directly compare PPP adjusted figures between diverse countries.

    49. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Those are old numbers...

      Do you honestly believe the standard of living of the average Chinese is anythng approaching that of an American? Maybe in 50 years, if they keep going up and America keeps going down.

      but don't kid yourself the US owes China a TON of money

      True. So what? The discussion was not balance of payments but standard of living.

    50. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Maybe we should find a way to take the GDP per capita figures and adjust them for the cost of living. We could divide the GDP per capita by the average cost in that country of some representative basket of goods (some house payments, some milk, some meat, a haircut, etc) to determine what we might call the "purchasing power" of the average individual. Since the goal here is to determine the amount of an equal set of goods available to the average citizen of two countries to be compared, let's call it Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) adjusted GDP per capita.

      Very good point. Now reread your parent, who posted exactly this information.

    51. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Perf · · Score: 1

      Maybe more like 80.

    52. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Smauler · · Score: 1

      You might have noticed the global slowdown and other countries blaming the U.S. They are correct, the U.S. people are officially tapped out, spent, broke, going back to basics and saving their money. And the rest of the world is livid about it.

      You might not have noticed, but the EU is a larger economy than the US, it imports a lot more (Germany, the UK and France alone import more than the US by most estimates), and is all but militarily a bigger player than the US. Sorry to burst your bubble.

    53. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Besides, besides Windows it's hard to argue that any software company has an absolute monopoly."

      Apple.

    54. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "True. So what? The discussion was not balance of payments but standard of living."

      No, it was who was rich or not.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    55. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by againjj · · Score: 1

      Actually, since it is a branch office of a US company, then it is really getting some people in America to pay rich American monopolists extra money through an intermediary in a third-world country.

    56. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by tftp · · Score: 1

      people buy a house in California that looks like a monkey shit all over it for like $800,000, when I could buy a small mansion here (or in most areas) for that amount.

      But in California you don't need to shovel snow from your driveway, and you can enjoy the nature practically all year round. That's why houses in CA cost that much - nobody wants to spend $N,000 per winter on heating fuel, deal with snow and ice, and experience power outages in the middle of a snowstorm. If you remove winter from your life you may find yourself essentially living longer, since you don't need to stay at home that much or waste energy on fighting snow, rain and mud. Good weather matters a lot if you only live once.

    57. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I was referring specifically to the governments, not the general populace. Or did the fact that I put the word "Governments" in there not clue you to that fact?

    58. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I live in Florida, and I do not need to shovel snow at all from my driveway, and I can enjoy the nature practically all year round as well. And I don't spend much on heating in the winter, either.

    59. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      Napoleon?

    60. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should stop paying for Chinese goods? Because obviously some factory boss in China is getting rich off of his exploited workers.

      You do realize that the factory boss is exploited too? Thats the problem with Free Trade Zones and the like- the only people who make money out of it are the megacorps. Its not like they pay the manufacturer a fair price and then make a modest profit when selling it on - thats just not how globalization is supposed to work!

    61. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by fork_daemon · · Score: 1

      No. They aren't stolen. They are authentic products. The dealers are actually wholesalers who sell the products loose. We even get manufacturer's warranty on the product, and also receive purchase receipts.

    62. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by tftp · · Score: 1

      How about hurricanes?

    63. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I'm British.

      Also, see the words of our glorious premier re: America starting it.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    64. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      How about Earthquakes, mudslides, and forest fires?

    65. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 'Merkican, damn it!!!!

    66. Re:I'd go the other way, personally by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Except the "cost of living" figures are not real -- they are based on prices of arbitrarily chosen product and can be easily skewed. How much would it cost in China to live an exact copy of American white-collar worker lifestyle (owning a house and a car, eating American fast food) and how it would compare to an actual person living in China doing a similar office job and living a similar kind of life (renting an apartment, having a bicycle, commuting public transit, eating local food)?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  14. Revoke install privs? by magarity · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems rather simple: just revoke their account privs for installing new software. I'm in China now and the piracy is not only rampant, the attitude is that only suckers pay. You'll have a near impossible task to try to enforce a no piracy rule by just asking nicely and for receipts. BTW, fake receipts are just as easy to get as pirated software so accepting those as proof will just get you fooled. The only way is to check product keys.

    1. Re:Revoke install privs? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The way they need to handle it if it is as you say would be to just buy the software, ship it to them and invoice it against their accounts.

      I'm not sure why a single branch is allowed to make their own software decisions anyways. Granted, they are in a different country but if it's the same company and not a contracted company or some partner thing between several companies, then it only makes sense that the company has control over this regardless of what the local management say. It's not like they can refuse to report income or something or steer the branch in the opposite direction the company is aiming for and start selling car parts or anything, likewise, it isn't like they shouldn't be obligated to follow corporate policy.

    2. Re:Revoke install privs? by Strolls · · Score: 1

      If you do that they're just resell the original software and continue using pirate cracks / keys.

    3. Re:Revoke install privs? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Really? Sounds like time to restaff that office then.

  15. Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass the by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is admirable that you want to follow the law, but it is not your decision to make. First, decide if you are willing to go down to the mat on this issue. You may antagonize your superiors and be retaliated against. The threshold question is whether the risk of losing your job or getting your career stalled is acceptable to you. It's perfectly fine to let the matter lie if you feel your job may be at risk in this economy.

    Whatever you decide to do, you should cover your ass. Write a formal memo detailing the foreign office's inability to demonstrate that its software is all legit. Call it to the attention of the Beijing folks and a US-based superior. But do not admit that the software is illegal. You do not know if it is. More to the point, it does not violate American law, which is mostly territorial. (The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act covers bribes, not copyright infringement but don't hold me to this.) Just say that you cannot prove the software is legitimate and leave it at that unless you have proof that it is illegal. File a copy of the memo away in a safe place and keep on trucking.

    Should you decide to go on the warpath, make sure you have adequate backing. You do not want to be left alone, or be the problem-maker. Work up the numbers and see how much it would cost to go legit. See if you can use this as a selling point: "All our software is legit; the competitors use stolen software that may have trojans or be incompatible." Work on a consensus with your colleagues and superiors.

    Lastly, be nice and tactful. Avoid being that douchebag who thinks he is better than everyone else. You cannot be effective if you are that dude. Be chill and try to make a win-win situation.

    But if the company management is utterly unwilling to fix the problem, let it drop. Document your suspicions (and say that it is only a suspicion, not proof), send it to the Beijing folks, and save a copy of the memo.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  16. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by RodgerDodger · · Score: 2, Informative

    It snows in Australia. Some parts of Australia receive no snow, just like some parts of the US receive no snow. Some parts receive a lot. Those parts presumably like to stock up on snow shovels.

    --
    "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  17. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Receipts for snow shovels from your Australia office. Never mind that it doesn't snow there.

    But it does.

  18. I know who you are by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I don't. But Let's see...

    * IT manager
    * a US west coast design company
    * a branch office in Beijing with 5 employees

    Can't be that many of them... I reckon half an hour on Google and I can work out who you are...

    > When I called the local office manager on this, he shrugged and replied, 'Well, every other shop here does it.' So I was wondering if there are any IT manager Slashdotters here in the the US

    Oh he knows who you are already...

    Good luck in your new career.

    1. Re:I know who you are by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Can't be that many of them... I reckon half an hour on Google and I can work out who you are...

      I always assume that these "Ask Slashdot" topics are entirely fictional. Most seem to be crafted like a TV movie of the week to hit a bunch of hot buttons and provoke controversy. Even if the company is real, (and having personal experience in China, the attitudes are quite expected) the person posting is not necessarily who he says he is, perhaps a former employee or junior staff trying to make trouble.

    2. Re:I know who you are by Slashcrap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I don't. But Let's see...

      * IT manager
      * a US west coast design company
      * a branch office in Beijing with 5 employees

      Can't be that many of them... I reckon half an hour on Google and I can work out who you are...

      You seem to be angered by the Op doing his job, to the extent that you wish to track him down and get him fired.

      I know it's difficult being a confused, hormonal 14 year old. Seriously though - try not to be such a gigantic faggot about it. This is some seriously pathetic rage against the machine type shit. I hope you remember it long enough to be properly ashamed about it.

    3. Re:I know who you are by Airw0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't be that many of them... I reckon half an hour on Google and I can work out who you are...

      I always assume that these "Ask Slashdot" topics are entirely fictional. Most seem to be crafted like a TV movie of the week to hit a bunch of hot buttons and provoke controversy.

      I just wish they could be more like the letters in the "Penthouse Forum"... :)

    4. Re:I know who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be a complete twat.

      The GP is just pointing out that this *could* be done - so it's pretty stupid to post these details (if true) unless you want to get exposed.

      And why don't you keep your petty homophobia to yourself?

      Asshole.

    5. Re:I know who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding right? OP has nothing to fear from parent poster who pointed out the obvious but a hell of lot to fear from employer. Slashdot isn't exactly an underground site. If they don't fire him for ratting them out and making a lot of trouble (why did he have to say what they did, where they are, where the branch office is, how many people work there) they will fire him for being an idiot.

    6. Re:I know who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go on then... tell us who it is. Put up or shut up.

      It's easy, right? Then do it.

    7. Re:I know who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because so few companies outsource to China...

    8. Re:I know who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck in your new career.

      What a thoroughly bizarre message.

    9. Re:I know who you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who said he was a homosexual? What does that have to do with anything anyway?

      This is some seriously pathetic homophobia. I hope you remeber it long enough to be properly ashamed about it.

  19. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it does snow in Australia.

  20. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by zonky · · Score: 2, Informative
  21. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Receipts for snow shovels from your Australia office. Never mind that it doesn't snow there.

    So, what, they don't write software in China? Or you're arguing that since they probably won't be caught or punished, they should do whatever they want?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  22. Hey in this economy... fuck it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the little man have to be moral and upstanding when the higher ups have been so currupt and and wasteful with us.

    Pirate the shit out of software... Run up your credit debt and buy luxory items with it... and when the law comes knocking, just ask congress for a bail out and a handshake. Hey it works for the rich, so why not you?

    Who really cares?

    Obama isnt our savior, and the shit wheel keeps on rolling folks. We havent changed shit.

  23. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so you know IT DOES SNOW IN AFRICA AT CHRISTMAS TIME. Can you believe Band Aid didn't know about the Atlas Mountains?

  24. They can install software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off the subject, but I'd pull admin rights. No need to be installing the latest and greatest malware (legally obtained)

  25. It's not "PDF stuff" by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's Adobe Creative Suite ... which includes stuff like Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. You won't find free replacements for those. (And don't bother replying about the GIMP until it has proper CMYK support.)

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert on color spaces, I suspect its a bit like high quality mp3 versus FLAC. Color spaces for the sense gifted (maybe we need some double blind tests.)

      CMYK support for GIMP

    2. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by jkrise · · Score: 1

      It's Adobe Creative Suite ... which includes stuff like Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. You won't find free replacements for those.

      I've been using MS Office for more than 10 years now... and apart from a little bit of Word; a little more of Excel; I never used Access or PowerPoint or any of the other goodies that gets bundled.

      Most people wrongly think they need to buy commercial software to create, email and print PDF documents... and buy the entire Adobe bundle.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    3. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by MooUK · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's related to the print method. A design company needs to know exactly what they will be printing, and their printers work on CMYK, not RGB like your screen (and therefore most programs). They therefore prefer to work with CMYK and are limited in their program choice.

    4. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Adobe Creative Suite ... which includes stuff like Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. You won't find free replacements for those. (And don't bother replying about the GIMP until it has proper CMYK support.)

      Stop being dishonest. Since you have no idea what they're using it for it could well be that the free replacements are more than adequate.

    5. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 1

      This might help with the CMYK stuff in GIMP, Separate+. I'm not a printer so I don't know for sure if this is the complete solution you're looking for though.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    6. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      My understanding is you can convert at print stage with GIMP, the only reason I can think of for caring about the method would be if you need constant feedback on color balance.

      Even then, I think it makes sense to balance colors on an RGB monitor with RGB space most of the time - since any working in CYMK is not directly perceivable until print stage anyway.

      I would calibrate the conversion and work in the color space my monitor can manage

    7. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have a clue; I'm no graphics expert.

      Sometimes it seems things are done the way they are simply because they *used* to have to be done that way, rather than they still do.

    8. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Informative

      "GIMP has no CMYK support" is in the same category as "You will lose copyright on anything made with GPL software". It is constantly being repeated by Microsoft marketing people despite being obviously false.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    9. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      No, when you print things you have to deal with CMYK. However judging by the quality of colors in everything printed, no one bothers with doing it properly anyway.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    10. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      My understanding is you can convert at print stage with GIMP, the only reason I can think of for caring about the method would be if you need constant feedback on color balance.

      BINGO! And guess what--there's a considerable amount of color printing done out there that where color accuracy is highly important. But from other exchanges I've had with some slashdotters on the matter, it seems that many don't seem to realize just how much of the world around them is in color (go figure).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    11. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      It's not so simple as all of that. The RGB colourspace has a range of colours that can't be represented in the CMYK colourspace, and vice versa. Therefore you need to setup a rendering intent to convert between the two. Most people nowadays profile their screen with a spider, then apply the profile to their image. Then they get the final CMYK output profile and do softproofing to emulate what will be seen on the printer. From there they tweak the image till it looks like what they want it to look like in the final printout.

      Alternatively, if they are smart, they embed their colour profile into their document or image and send this to the printer and tell them to use the colour profile.

      But then again, most graphics designers send their work to the printer, the printer then tries to make it look good, prints off a proof on an Epson or HP proofing printer to ask if they think it looks like it should, and the designer is happy. Obviously the better the printer's sense of colour the less times they need to send the designer back a proof.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    12. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Your monitor, unless it is a monochromatic 1980s wonder, can manage FAR more colors than can fit into CMYK color space.

      You can't just - "convert at print stage".
      Unless you are working with CMYK values from the start you are risking your printouts looking nothing like they "should".
      A very simple test to explain is printing basic RGB Red, Green and Blue (255-0-0, 0-255-0, 0-0-255).
      No printer in the world can reproduce those colors accurately. It is because you screen works with light, while your printer works with pigments.
      Closest you might get is with the red. Green and Blue... Well.. just try it.

      Think of it this way...
      RGB is like Float - CMYK is like Integer.

      2+2 will be 4 using both values, but 2.4 + 2.4 wont.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    13. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by orzetto · · Score: 1

      (And don't bother replying about the GIMP until it has proper CMYK support.)

      What if I reply about Krita? They do claim support for CMYK colorspace, though I don't know whether that's good enough of an implementation compared to Adobe products.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    14. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      I think the point is, calibration of the color devices only needs to occur once, not constantly throughout the use of the software.

    15. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. So it has rudimentary CMYK support via plugins (hey, it's better than nothing). Let me know when it can support spot colors.

    16. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just tried to create a CMYK image in GIMP 2.6 (supposedly the latest and greatest stable version) and all I could choose from were RGB and greyscale.

      Do I need some sort of plugin then?

    17. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Actually this is only kind of true. One of the only reasons you'd need cmyk support in gimp (or photoshop for that matter) is proofing - otherwise these days you can work in both color spaces and live to tell about it. Some actual facts:

      Most of the entire cmyk colorspace fits in rgb

      Windows print path (sans Adobe postscript passthrough - which only adobe apps support) actually converts the colorspace to rgb anyhow.

      Most any rip worth its money today will handle rgb data.

      Even if you are using rgb images in photoshop and indesign - you can proof how it will look on a cmyk device using color management.

      (disclaimer: yes I at one point had a job in the industry as a developer... but I don't know anything about gimp really)

      So you could use gimp or paintshop along with microsoft publisher in a printshop, you just need to do a lot of proofs - something Acrobat is good for. Typically in rgb the kinds of colors you can use far exceed what the device can use - and that is primarily the only difference these days.

    18. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Gimp pretty much consists of plugins.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    19. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      "GIMP has no CMYK support" is in the same category as "You will lose copyright on anything made with GPL software". It is constantly being repeated by Microsoft marketing people despite being obviously false.

      It is also repeated as a mantra mostly by those who have never had to publish a printed work in their lives. Even those who do such work tend to make a mess of it 8 times out of 10.

    20. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > A design company needs to know exactly what they will be printing, and their printers
      > work on CMYK, not RGB like your screen (and therefore most programs). They therefore
      > prefer to work with CMYK

      Unless they have a *monitor* that supports CMYK, this preference is pretty much irrelevant. Software cannot magically turn your computer screen's additive medium into a paper-like subtractive one. It's physically impossible. Photoshop's CMYK support is mostly just a buzzword. (Okay, yeah, so there's also the ability to specify rich black. I think I'll maybe wet my pants over that one.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    21. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you clearly are an expert on printing and publishing. Please point me to a list of your published works and credentials. Thank you.

    22. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      Gimp pretty much consists of plugins.

      GIMP = Graphics Imaging via Multiple Plug-ins

      I love it!

    23. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      And don't bother replying about the GIMP until it has proper CMYK support.

      Most users don't need CMYK support. Even some who think they need CMYK support, don't need CMYK support.

      Given that, the GIMP is perfectly fine for the vast majority of people who need to edit raster graphics.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    24. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      And don't bother with the GIMP until it has a UI that works. Same goes for Blender, although Blender at least starts making sense after a *really steep* learning curve.

      That's the thing I cannot stand about the FOSS community - its insistence that its products are "just as good" when they can't even accomplish the most basic in usability tasks. I admire the ideals of FOSS, but I simply cannot stand by and champion free choices like the GIMP as a "replacement" for Photoshop when it is so woefully inferior in usability.

    25. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Dishonest? The submitter said it's a design company. Presumably they're using it for graphic design. I worked for graphic design companies for many years. The GIMP doesn't cut it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    26. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dishonest?

      Yes, dishonest.

      The submitter said it's a design company.

      Yes.

      Presumably they're using it for graphic design.

      No, he didn't say that. Stop pretending he did. "Design" covers a multitude of different activities.

      I worked for graphic design companies for many years.

      Good for you. Doesn't make you an expert, or even a tiny bit informed, on what he and/or his Chinese branch office does.

      The GIMP doesn't cut it.

      You have no idea what "cuts it" for him or his Chinese branch office. You're dishonest pretending you do. As you know full well gimp does cut it for a variety of practical workflows.

      Even given that you're also dishonest pretending that every design company on the planet works exactly the same way you do when you know damn well that's not true.

    27. Re:It's not "PDF stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the much better argument that the GIMP is a useless piece of crap that no consummate professional would or should ever waste time to learn unless he was some foaming at the mouth freetard ideologue who was willing to sacrifice the quality and speed of completing his work to prove the point?

  26. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by daveime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Avoid being that douchebag who thinks he is better than everyone else

    I'd say it's probably a bit late for that.

    While the poster's motives might appear noble, I don't understand exactly what he's trying to achieve. A promotion, extra brownie points, getting someone in a foreign country fired, or at least severely embarrassed (and they set a lot of store on respect in Asia btw).

    He's already approached the person responsible, and voiced his concerns. Just because said person didn't take the action he expected, instead of leaving it alone, he posts it on Slashdot for the world and his wife to comment on. And within a few days it'll be all indexed by Google for posterity.

    To me he comes across as an anal retentive asshole who should be spending more time doing his job, rather than trying to shaft other people ... but that's just me, karma be damned.

  27. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm saying it's a completely irrelevant concern. And you *know* that is what I'm saying.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  28. Get Over It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget it ever happened lest you, and not the illegally copied software, are viewed as the problem. Keep complaining, and an H1-B visa with a job description curiously like your present position may soon appear.

  29. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    You may antagonize your superiors and be retaliated against. The threshold question is whether the risk of losing your job or getting your career stalled is acceptable to you. It's perfectly fine to let the matter lie if you feel your job may be at risk in this economy.

    Of course, if you have evidence of such things, you can always contact the Business Software Alliance. Maybe you can get a piece of that million dollars to tide you over in your unemployment...

  30. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I have seen a patch of snow at the summit of Mount Bogong in February. I am pretty sure it survives most years.

    But no, I doubt it snows this side of Australian Antarctic Territory at this time of year. Though it might snow on Heard Island.

  31. Not about moral high ground but smart CYA folks by ACK!! · · Score: 1

    If you inform the office and cc'ed the boss when you know something illegal is going down, your covered. If you don't, and there is a stink they fire you and put you up as the scapegoat. The guys in the China office were following local tradition but that states-side IT manager knew and did nothing. So he is fired. But if you are the good employee in all the news reports that told the higher-ups in that-stereotypical-memo-dated-whenever that the office in China was going to fuck up the works for everyone. And they did not listen. No one is going to give you a medal but you reported what you knew via the proper channels and they don't fire you.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:Not about moral high ground but smart CYA folks by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      Holy incident report, batman! And then, according to many corporate policy, you are covered. The OP mentioned that it was a 'small' company, so that level of audit, compliance, and the beloved documentation may not have reached them yet.

      Either way, if the dude in Beijing won't get licenses, and I was an IT manager responsible, I'd look to the insecurity of cracked software on the network, and fix the problem that way.

      I've read a few posts which indicate "thats just the way it is in China". I think the issue isn't changing a culture as much as protecting assets, company business, etc... and removing the suspect software via security issues seems easier than fighting the culture war, as it were. I might even just order up the licenses and keep them handy so I could deflect any copyright claims.

      If you can't win a security vulnerability issue battle in your environment as an IT manager, maybe that environment isn't worth working for (for very long).

  32. woah boy woah by karearea · · Score: 1

    Let's not get carried away.

    As far as I have known, APAC refers to Asia Pacific .. which includes place like NZ.

    Probably best to refer to Bejing / China as China or maybe at a pinch Asia. But please not Asia Pacific.

    1. Re:woah boy woah by Narcogen · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be pedantic, at least get it right. APAC includes China and Japan, not just New Zealand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia_Pacific

  33. What is with all the posts advocating open source by ragethehotey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the fact that he has stated they are a design firm makes it pretty clear that at least one of the pirated pieces of software is Adobe Photoshop?

    Nobody would actually be so naive to claim that GIMP is a legitimate and complete open source alternative for Photoshop for a design firm at this point in time? Right? (Although I obviously hope that it will be at some point in the future and GIMP currently is great to give to friends that are learning photo manipulation software for the first time)

  34. Isn't China just great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everyone else does it."
    If you can use it to justify female infanticide, then surely it can work for software piracy too.

  35. It snows in AU only when Al Gore is in town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It snows in Australia.
    Only when Al Gore is in town.
    or at least that is what Tim Blair tells me. Link

  36. Call the BSA. by Narcocide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.bsa.org/ It is completely anonymous.

    Why would I - an open source advocate - suggest such a thing? Simple; Forcing people to use and learn from Linux (and thereby allowing Linux to learn from them in turn) is better than passively letting them steal MicroSoft products they can't afford which only improves MicroSoft's ability to leverage their installation base in illegally (in the US at least) anti-competitive practices. This will force MicroSoft to price their software at what its worth or make it worth what they charge.

    Why would I claim to be a benevolent person who cares for the good of humanity with such apparently cruel intentions as forcing users to use Linux unwillingly? That answer is also simple but if you don't already know it then it is pointless for me to state it.

    1. Re:Call the BSA. by MrSpiff · · Score: 1

      Why would you call the BSA on your own organization rather than trying to correct the problem yourself? Also, what open source software would you recommend as a replacement for Adobe Creative Suite? And please don't say GIMP.

    2. Re:Call the BSA. by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      If they earn money with software, they should pay for it. If they earn money with it, the costs will pay off eventually. If the wages are too low or software too expencive -- they have to learn other software which isn't.
      But that is not a major problem here. If you look deeper -- it's corporations who encourage piracy. Microsoft and Adobe now have monopolistic hold on all developing markets without spending a cent. Once the market is developed enough, they'll milk it. First comes the government, then companies and eventually OEMs. Pirated copys will remain for general public to compete with free alternatives and to prevent the marketshare to slip. There is no ??? before profit here.
      The world would be a much better place without software pirates, but not for the reasons corporations tell you about. Imagine millions of chinese using something else than Windows and MS-Office... Sweet...

    3. Re:Call the BSA. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      http://www.bsa.org/ It is completely anonymous.

      And only has the police cooperation for their gunpoint audits within the United States, which isn't going to do much good when the non-compliant office is located in Beijing.

    4. Re:Call the BSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bsa.org/ It is completely anonymous.

      Why would I - an open source advocate - suggest such a thing?

      Because you're an open source bigot who wants everyone to do things like you do.

    5. Re:Call the BSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the A in BSA doesn't stand for America, but trust me, it even more doesn't stand for Asia.

      The entire basis of your idea will have the non-Asian counterpart of the company in trouble for pirating software while the Asian part goes out to the local 50 cent DVD store for more movies and games. And, of course, updated software. :D

    6. Re:Call the BSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China, dude. China. No BSA.

  37. Don't fight it, go behind their backs by PhireN · · Score: 1

    Your never going to get them to cooperate with you, so Instead just go along with them. Then think up some bogus excuse to find out what software is installed, and assume any software you haven't given them is pirated.

    Then go to all the affected companies and buy the licences from them. Keep all the licences Locked up at the head office. Just leave the branch offices with the pirated software installed.
    That way you have the moral high ground (and probably legal immunity), the companies get their money and the branch office doesn't get angry with you.

    1. Re:Don't fight it, go behind their backs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my vote. Either ask them what they're running or do an audit, then purchase the appropriate licenses and ship them copies of the discs and keys (keep the origs. at corp.)

      Isn't it corp's responsibility to provide for their offices? It's not an affiliate or franchise or something, it's the same company. You don't tell the secretaries in the US office to buy their own copies of word do you? no, it's the company's responsibility to provide sw, for their employees.

      Sure create suite seems expensive, but if you compare it to the value your employees create for the company with it, it's minor. just do it.

  38. more likely, there'd be more by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it were 100% impossible to pirate Microsoft and Adobe products, it'd speed up their replacement with open-source software immensely.

  39. this is usual... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    atleast here in india. every computer that has not been bought from dell, hp or some other international company has pirate windows and office on it. recently microsoft complained to a big company here and guess what they switched completely to ubuntu.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    1. Re:this is usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      atleast here in india. every computer that has not been bought from dell, hp or some other international company has pirate windows and office on it. recently microsoft complained to a big company here and guess what they switched completely to ubuntu.

      Even many computers bought from HP do...

      Look at the laptop models HP sells in India

      Most of them don't have Windows pre-installed, they have FreeDOS. I doubt there are that many people actually using FreeDOS.

    2. Re:this is usual... by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      recently microsoft complained to a big company here and guess what they switched completely to ubuntu.

      If a chair flys out of Windows in India, and no one hears it, does it make a sound?

  40. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by KyoMamoru · · Score: 1

    Just to throw it out there, since you are now known as 'KNOWING' that there is such an issue. You must at least report it to someone that is higher in the chain of command than you. Save the document that you send, and cover your ass. Essentially your e-mail/letter should have your professional recommendations, and that you are leaving it in their hands.

  41. Seen it time and time again with Asian offices... by Taelron · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm an I.T. consultant in Silicon Valley and several of my clients over the years have had manufacturing offices in Hong Kong and China.

    I've had to deal with this situation more times than I care for in the last 10 years. Its a very big legal hassle for your company, and their are raids every few years. Not enough to scare the Asian work force into compliance, but its enough of a game of corporate Russian roulette that the risk just isn't worth it.

    Not only are many of the Asian offices using pirated software, but are not running any antivirus software. I've routinely tracked down about 80% of all infections at my client offices to their e-mails with their overseas counterparts or from when they are traveling in Asia on business.

    Also, much of the pirated versions of the software are riddled with trojans, spyware, and security holes galore. Allowing them to use that software further opens up your entire company up to a breach or leak of information.

    I've also seen more than one company fold or nearly go under because one disgruntled person called in an anonymous tip that their current or former companies software was not legit.

    In a corporate environment, getting the documentation and legal software is definitely the IT managers job, and an obvious C.Y.A. for anyone in the I.T. department and the company officers... Its those heads that will roll if the B.S.A. shows up with the authorities to audit you.

  42. Nitpick by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    ...he should probably just nip this in the butt...

    The phrase originates in gardening: to prevent a plant flowering you "nip it in the bud". I'm pretty sure he doesn't want to bite the arse that feeds him.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    1. Re:Nitpick by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      ? I didn't know he worked at McDonalds.

    2. Re:Nitpick by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Something that bothers me about TFS is the phrase "I could care less". I'm hearing it a lot from people inside the USA these days, and I'd like to remind the general population there that the actual phrase is "I couldn't care less".

      "I could care less" is at best completely useless to say, and more often, completely nonsensical, as the user means that they don't care, which is clearly the opposite of what it actually means.

    3. Re:Nitpick by MikeUW · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but I doubt anyone wants to be fed by an arse either. If biting it is the solution to make it stop feeding you, you probably won't hesitate.

    4. Re:Nitpick by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      The phrase isn't new. I remember railing against it at least four years ago on slashdot. I hadn't seen it in a while though, I guess the wave is back :(

    5. Re:Nitpick by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      The topic is licenses for proprietary software...I know what I meant.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    6. Re:Nitpick by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Mind you... if I care enough to state my lack of care, I probably *could* care less.

    7. Re:Nitpick by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I always thought it had something to do with pack animals where a few would distract the prey from the front while one or two came in from behind. Dogs are common on this too, a lot of them will byte when your eyes are looking away from them rather when you are at them.

      Of course that goes out the windows with trained guard dogs who will attack without fear. Most won't, or should I say tend not to attack straight on unless they see fear though.

      Anyways, thanks. It's cool to know.

    8. Re:Nitpick by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      Indeed. Whilst I've learned to tolerate some of the more common abuses of spelling or grammar, the difference between 'could' and 'could not' seems... well, rather fundamental to the meaning of the statement.

      The best 'response' post I've found so far is this one: http://incompetech.com/gallimaufry/care_less.html

      Inlining the 'caring continuum' image seems to work rather well to get the point across.

    9. Re:Nitpick by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Nice. Thanks for the link.

  43. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you were saying that there was no need for what the Chinese are pirating, just like there's no need for snow-shovels in Australia.

    You're a dumb ass on both points. The Chinese need commercial software, but they don't want to pay for it. The Australians need snow-shovels, and you don't know how to construct an analogy.

  44. Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I experienced a similar situation with an office in Moscow and I came to the conclusion that we can police these things, but we cannot prosecute AND execute sanctions, that is for someone else in the organisation to do.

    An IT department is there to serve its customer base, protect the corporate assets and present evidence to others in the case of wrong doing. Let someone else deal with the headache of dealing with people, the machines are more than enough to cope with.

  45. This is a sad reality by code4fun · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, there will always be software piracy. Software makers spend a lot protecting their IP. This goes back to copy protection (a total PITA). And, there will always be crackers who break the copy protection. It's an endless cycle. If software is priced properly, I believe people will pay for it regardless of the software being proprietary. Or, just make the switch to open source where you are free to use and modify the software. Cheers.

    1. Re:This is a sad reality by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Priced properly? The only acceptable price for many people is zero. If it is available for free, they will not pay. Period.

      Without force of law, company policy or something else I believe most people will choose "free" every time. Some people are guilt-ridden and would "feel bad" if they used pirated software. Counting on this for sustaining a company is a bad idea.

      Counting on some kind of abstract morality to keep people from pirating software is a joke. The biggest problem is that these guys can get prosecuted in a US court and the parent company made to pay fines.

  46. APAC? by apadula · · Score: 1

    Personally, my colleagues from APAC all have licensed software, although none of our offices are in China.

    You see, APAC is a very large place, with quite a few countries, some of which are mostly law abiding.

  47. This is how they treat "IP" in China by Technomancer · · Score: 1

    Get over it.
    You real problem is that your company "IP" (designs, whatever) will show up at those every other shops,

  48. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by Wond696 · · Score: 1

    This is by far the wisest route on the issue. I would just add that you "could" notify your legal department of it and leave it to them to handle. It is their responsbility to deal with legal issues of all kinds. For your part you just need to make a reasonable attempt to resolve the situation through your appropriate chain of command. If they arean't interested document your findings and move on.

    If you bring this up and the BSA comes callign when managment doesn't act your almost garanteed to experiance some kind of retaliation.

    As someone who works with Asset software i garantee the effort of cleaning up your asset's and tracking everything is well worth it. You could always pitch the cost savings of such a system by reducing waste and overpurchasing.

  49. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1

    It is admirable that you want to follow the law, but it is not your decision to make.

    Yes it is. It is everybody's decision whether or not to follow the law or make a moral choice - which of course may not be the same thing.

    You may decide the law is immoral or otherwise not worth obeying in any particular case, but it will be your decision, and you cannot shift the responsibility to your superiors or anyone else.

    If you know your employer or indeed anyone is breaking a law, you share the responsibility - indeed in many jurisdictions you are legally obligated to turn them in.

    You may decide the law is immoral or that the consequences of trying to follow it are not worth it, that the legal punishment is too harsh or simply that since your resources are limited, you must choose where and when you use them and when you just turn blind eye or make just a modest effort because you can't do everything or because you realistically assess you cannot win - but it's always your decision, and you should make it knowingly.

  50. No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by dbc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course this will happen with APAC shops unless the APAC employees get training in US buisiness culture, and the US employees get training in Chinese buisiness culture. Bootleg software is the *least* surprise your exectutives will receive unless they get out in front of this issue.

    The APAC employees need the "this is how we do things here" speech. They will think you are nuts. If you repeat the speech enough, they will get it.

    1. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      APAC employees need the "this is how we do things here" speech.

      First learn what "APAC" means. Australia, New Zealand, for a start. Try not demonstrating your ignorance when giving your patronising "speech".

    2. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by mwooller · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, traditional "US business culture" is the last thing you want to be pushing... It is a dismal failure.

    3. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      After browsing the wikipedia article on APAC then it is pretty clear that the OP got it right on the money to begin with. If, among a list of 30+ countries that includes China you can only identify Australia and New Zealand and therefore claim that he is some how wrong then at best it isn't the OP who is demonstrating his ignorance.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    4. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the recent economic problems in the US, the US employees might need the "this is how we do things" speech from the APAC shops.

    5. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If, among a list of 30+ countries that includes China you can only identify Australia and New Zealand and therefore claim that he is some how wrong then at best it isn't the OP who is demonstrating his ignorance.

      No, it was an attempt by the original poster either to use some buzzword acronym, or perhaps to avoid seeming to be racist by using the word "Chinese". Certainly APAC includes China but it also includes many other countries where patronising its people by giving them a lecture about "how we do business in the USA" would be both unnecessary, inappropriate and offensive. (Of course Chinese would probably also find it insulting, but I'm just speaking as an Australian.)

    6. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But APAC also includes South Korea, Japan, and Singapore.

      So, yes, the OP was really wrong. Try summing the size of these economies together with Australia and New Zealand.

    7. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it was an attempt by the original poster either to use some buzzword acronym, or perhaps to avoid seeming to be racist by using the word "Chinese". Certainly APAC includes China but it also includes many other countries where patronising its people by giving them a lecture about "how we do business in the USA" would be both unnecessary, inappropriate and offensive. (Of course Chinese would probably also find it insulting, but I'm just speaking as an Australian.)

      Now that I see your point I have to say that you are absolutely right. I focused on the topic of this discussion (the company with the 5+ employee office in China) and kept thinking that by "APAC employees" he was referring to those 5+ in the China office. After looking at the big picture then it becomes pretty clear that the comment in fact sound patronising and conveys a bit of the old proverbial colonial attitude.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    8. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Thanks for actually reading my post and not just flaming me.

    9. Re:No cross-culture training in your company, eh? by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      Yeah... APAC does seem to be a newer buzzword. Why can't they just say, um, you know ... China, when they mean China?

  51. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by beav007 · · Score: 1

    I think it snowed in Tasmania in December...

  52. Re:What is with all the posts advocating open sour by dbIII · · Score: 1

    With respect, gimp now is a huge improvement on what photoshop was a few years ago when those versions of photoshop were being used by design firms. Now I wouldn't recommend gimp to a professional graphics designer - that would just be like recommending they use the MS Windows platform instead of Macs - but it still does a pretty good job for a lot of stuff. It's really designed for web graphics so the escalating "gimp can't do 768bit color" argument may still be dragged out in the far future and is still utterly ridiculous even today when people are complaining it can't do 16 bits per channel. Not many people really need 16 bits for each of three colors plus 16 bits of transparency.

  53. Standard practice in the Solomon Islands by capt_mulch · · Score: 0

    This level of software piracy is standard in the Solomon Islands, and I assume much of the rest of the Pacific.

  54. Two tiny areas of Oz get some snow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And those two areas get fuck all of it and not every year.

    The rest of the country gets none.

    Remember, Australia is simply a hot and barren wasteland, bordered by some hot and tropical rain forest.

    1. Re:Two tiny areas of Oz get some snow. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Remember, Australia is simply a hot and barren wasteland, bordered by some hot and tropical rain forest.

      You're digging yourself into a hole here. Most of the world has the occasional chuckle about the ignorance of the "average American", whatever that might be, but you at least seem to fit the description, since you apparently have no idea where Australia is. ;-)

  55. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by ebonum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to say this, but you sound like a paid microsoft poster. Raids? In China? Have you ever been to China? Honestly. Please don't spread FUD. Trust me. I live here.

    I would worry about trojans, spyware. These are legitimate concerns.

    Another concern is that a lot of development in China takes place on very old slow machines. You want to do development here? Plan on using Microsoft VCC 6.0. Want to buy a copy? Forget it. Microsoft dropped that one about a decade ago. ( actually it is amazing how these kids get so much done working little on 17 inch monitors )

    Iâve seen a lot people here using pirated software that is three generations old and no older available. But, it runs 10 times as fast as the new versions, and still seems slow on the old machines here.

  56. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    There was hail one Christmas Day in Victoria, does that count? :)

  57. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    he posts it on Slashdot for the world and his wife to comment on

    Syntax error: could not be parsed.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  58. Interesting understanding. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    MOD PARENT UP. Funny.

  59. Bad idea by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    You become increasingly dependant on expensive software, as you can get freely, and if something change (like that they start to enforce copyrigth) you could not have enough margin to move away and have to buy all of that. If you can afford it, then buy it or at least be sure to always have enough budget to do that. If not, go to a free or at least cheaper alternative

  60. Actually... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Actually, while I don't know the exact situation for Romania at the moment, most places where political corruption and injustice run amok have another fun twist: making an example of some random bugger to prove that the system works. So if I were to take an uninformed bet, I'd say you're also at risk of:

    - some competitor being owned by a corrupt politician or his best buddy (or just someone with money for bribes), wanting to get rid of you

    - WTO or whoever leans too hard on the government, so a few guys get rounded up and hung up to dry, just to show the world that your country takes IP seriously after all

    - some official is gunning for a promotion or reelection, so a few guys get rounded up and made an example of, just so he can come across as the great crime fighter

    Etc.

    Basically my take is that living in a corrupt system is a risk, rather than some blanket insurance against prosecution.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually am from Romania. Nowadays things are different . Every "small shop" has to have licenses. There are no more pirates saling counterfeit CDs on the streets, and every other month there is a control from the National Organization of IP scanning every PC. This happened to small businesses and large(state controlled) ones alike. They target counterfeit software from Microsoft Adobe and games in internet cafes. The fine in the range of 10K USD, depending on infringement. Of course there are companies who don't respect the law, but there are exceptions and not commonplace.

  61. Make the decision yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would be a terrible idea to stall purchasing proper licenses any longer.

    Get them their own, legit copies of the software they use immediately - so that I can use their CS4 key when it inevitably shows up on the internet next Tuesday. This is China after all. It'd be like buying a hobo a Ferrari and expecting him not to swap it for booze.

  62. Cookie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and possible get a cookie.

    Almost all websites these days will give you a cookie -- or several -- just for visiting, regardless what you do. :)

  63. Why fuckign micro-manage? by msimm · · Score: 1

    Unless I missed something in the not currently linked story, part of having branch offices is having local branch managers. Sticking your head in, then badgering everyone with OMG phyracey! might make it sound like you've simply got too much free time (you probably do). Good luck with that Dwight.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  64. They are they are a small shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am a Chinese programmer, not in Beijing, but in China anyway.

    In China, most small business task the risk of using pirated software and being caught by MS,Adobe and etc.

    Usually, big firms forbid employee using pirated software. They are afraid of letters from lawyers just like the American ones.

    For example, they may use WPS instead of MS Office, use notepad++ instead of UltraEdit and so on.

  65. Why not just ORDERING THEM TO BUY THE SOFTWARE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a bunch of people advocating "open source"... and a bunch of people telling that the CFO or executive office asks them for whatever.... the company is profitable, the company has money.... the policy?... you need the software? go ahead and BUY IT.

    The software is the tool that helps you being productive, why not just buy the licenses, close the issue, and move on?....

  66. Fix the problem if it is your responsibility by Adammil2000 · · Score: 1

    If your role makes you responsible for them, tell them to correct the problem by paying for software or using FOSS and tell them the deadline by which you are going to verify that it has been fixed. If the responsibility for them lies elsewhere, then send a note to your manager about how they claim to pirate software regularly and let your manager decide what's next, if anything. You're done at that point.

    My philosophy is that I don't care what country a person lives in, if they work for me they follow both my rules and their local laws. Being responsible for someone else in the workplace means that sometimes you have to correct them if they make bad decisions and make sure the correction sticks.

  67. At last, someone mentions security! by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    See if you can use this as a selling point: "All our software is legit; the competitors use stolen software that may have trojans or be incompatible."

    Exactly! In among the good, the bad and the ugly, here at last is a great point that's germane to the arguement, and the man's job title. Even if he is somehow not responsable for licence compliance, (which I'd somehow doubt, since he is 'I.T. manager'), he damn well is for system integrity. Anyway - whichever way this thing eventually goes wrong - he'll end up getting hit by some of the shrapnel.

    The angles of security, support and compatibility are all areas where IT can legitimately address the issues of pirating software whilst neatly sidestepping the ethical/legal ones, (pass that buck on to managmeent). If your local guys are installing pirate aps on their boxen, what else is on there? Could it potentially infect your entire network?

    As someone else has pointed out, you need to get your IT policy written and approved by your management first. Then I'd do a memo to the local management, pointing out the security risks of using software from 'non-approved' sources. Give him a chance to fix things before you drop the boom on him.

    Agree with the local users what they need, buy the software at corporate level, install and monitor for compliance using tools mentioned in other posts. Educate users as to their role in ensuring compliance with company IT policy. Then educate them again...

  68. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    I think it snowed in Tasmania in December...

    I was up at Cradle Mountain one Christmas (summer), it was over 30C. And then on New Years' Day it snowed. People wander up there in shorts and T-shirts and die of exposure when a storm hits.

  69. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by DerWulf · · Score: 1

    Your sig and your comment go together very well Sir ;) ... (tip: it's prudent to buy what you need in winter in the summer and vice versa. It can be A LOT cheaper that way)

    --

    ___
    No power in the 'verse can stop me
  70. I am in APAC. And we don't use pirate stuff. by bronney · · Score: 2, Informative

    The companies I worked for thru the years here in Hong Kong never install pirate stuff as we have great timely support from the US office whenever we need. The question I have for you is:

    Why is your BJ branch installing pirated office and adobe? Don't you have license for those software and whether you provide them with a link to the US servers to download? If not, do you have a process where they can "order" software from you, or have the budget to buy the software in mainland?

    The ultimate question, which I suspect is why they do it, is, are they pirating photoshop because your US office is too cheap to get them what's good, and forces them to use MS paint to crop silly pictures?

    This happens in a lot of places, 1 or 2 computers in a company has Acrobat, all the other ones uses Acrobat reader. Those 2 computers go on vacation, some dude needs to change some text in a PDF and notice the reader can't do it. They ended up pirating Acrobat.

    Provide everyone with the software they need to get the job done. Educate them to ASK you for them if they need it but don't have it. And if you don't have it, won't buy it in time, and don't care, then just shut up (I am sorry for the bluntness). If the BJ office has access to your legit software, they won't pirate it.

  71. Software piracy? heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to break it to you, but China isn't the only country with that kind of attitude - and with the high price you pay for such poor product, it's no surprise.

    It's the same story with music, over priced, poorer product, less product, and 'very' cheap to produce.

    Compared to say a movie, which has more content, costs less, and costs an order of magnitude more money to produce.

    When Microsoft actually require 50-100 million dollars to make the next installment of MS office, 'then' I'll consider the ludicrous price they ask for it.

  72. Jejeje a que Chinos by vromo.blogspot.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hasta lo mas curado tiene agua

  73. Re:What is with all the posts advocating open sour by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Nobody would actually be so naive to claim that GIMP is a legitimate and complete open source alternative for Photoshop for a design firm at this point in time? Right?

    I don't think anyone is. A few people are repeating the open source mantra but few have specifically mentioned the Gimp so far.

    Perhaps they didn't read the summary properly.

  74. Bounty? by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    Isn't there a bounty for denouncing a company for piracy? It would be nice if they fined the company and paid the snitch a good percentage :D

  75. Re:What is with all the posts advocating open sour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody would actually be so naive to claim that GIMP is a legitimate and complete open source alternative for Photoshop

    Nobody would be so dishonest as to pretend that GIMP doesn't cover many people's needs could they? And "legitimate"? Sounds like somebody has an agenda.

    You have no idea what work they are doing in that branch office. It could be a sales or support office. Stop pretending you do know.

  76. In soviet russia... by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2, Funny

    The software pirates YOU!

  77. Totally his job to know what is on those computers by gsslay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To me he comes across as an anal retentive asshole who should be spending more time doing his job

    The poster may have been foolhardy bringing it to slashdot, but it is totally his job to be concerned about it. As IT manager he needs to be know about software installed on the company's computers. This applies whether it's pirated, or completely legal copies of software not approved or suitable for the company's business.

    Pirated software is more likely to have viruses and malware than legitimate copies. If this branch office is either networked or in regular email contact with the rest of the company, then any IT manager would be being negligent if they weren't taking an interest in what was installed on those computers.

    If the IT manager doesn't have enough influence to instruct what should be on those computers, and what should not, then they he needs to tell his superiors he will bear no responsibility for any possible damage traced back to them. If his superiors are fine with that, then so be it. But you'd then be left wondering what they want an IT Manager for.

  78. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    While the poster's motives might appear noble, I don't understand exactly what he's trying to achieve. A promotion, extra brownie points, getting someone in a foreign country fired, or at least severely embarrassed ...

    You see, there are some people who have these crazy concepts which the rest of the world doesn't really understand. They refer to them as "morals", "honour", "integrity" ... weird names like that. I hear that some obscure dictionaries might even define them, in case you'd like to look them up. Anyway, as best as I can tell those words all generally refer to a desire to "do the right thing", regardless of personal cost or any potential reward.

    Crazy, eh? It's weird to think that there may be such naive people on this planet. It's a good thing that pragmatic individuals such as you and I know better! Remember boys and girls: the number one question behind every action should be: "What's in it for ME?".

  79. Dear Pentdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I just wish they could be more like the letters in the "Penthouse Forum"... :)

    They already are: "Dear Slashdot, I never believed your story until one night I posted an anonymous story with my name (don't worry - I omitted the consonants!) , address, place of employment, personal details, SSN, credit card numbers, mother's maiden name to Slashdot. I got fired by my employer who blamed me, arrested thanks to my tip to Microsoft, thrown into jail and there, in the strangest of places I found love with my 300 lb cell mate - and I do mean strangest of places... xo"

  80. Pirate by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

    Information should be shared.

    --
    Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
  81. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the US your experience may be correct, but it is extremely unlikely that the BSA with the local authorities will actually show up anywhere on this side of the Chinese wall (perhaps it is different in Hong Kong though).

    With a piracy rate of around 90% here, I would assume they would like to though. But with the global economy situation, I guess there may be other priorities....

  82. don't use commercial software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use open source software ! This is be THE solution.

  83. A few points to consider-IANAL by QuestorTapes · · Score: 1

    > "I'm the IT manager for a west coast design company that has
    > a small branch office in Beijing with 5 employees, a few
    > workstations and a couple of servers. Recently, it came to
    > my attention that the Beijing office has been routinely
    > installing and using pirated software on their computers --
    > MS Office and Adobe Creative Suite, mostly....

    If this is an actual branch office; owned by the US firm rather than a partner or other more complex arrangement, the US office is legally responsible for the activities of the Beijing office. Copyright law and, increasingly, Intellectual Property rights law, are internationally enforceable by treaty. Violations that occur in China can be taken to court in the US, and your office's assets seized, as I understand it. If MS or Adobe becomes aware of this, they can get damages from the US office, which may be heavy.

    You became aware of this; you reported it to your superiors. If they choose to disregard this, consider two things: covering your own tail, and suggesting strongly that your superiors check the advisability of their decision with the company lawyers, and document this (and consider checking with your own attorney).

    It has long been the rule under US law that US firms breaking US law in foreign countries "because everyone does it" can be dealt with by the DOJ. This is often applied in cases or bribery, but the precedent would also apply here.

    I'm not a lawyer, so check these suggestions with one. Slashdot is not the best place for legal advice.

  84. Your Attitude by omb · · Score: 1

    This kind of lazy, unethical and CYA attitude is why we are economic melt-down.

    You would find a fine place in a pre-meltdown bank, broker or rating agency.

    This is also why the rest of the word will NEVER trust america again.

    1. Re:Your Attitude by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it's not just America - corporate arse-covering, deceit and weasellyness are rife - being ethical is just fundamentally not compatible with 'big business' - full compliance with every regulation out there is next to impossible, so you end up having to 'fudge' them here and there, and from there... well, if you're fudging one that's 'ok' then why not fudge a few more that are just a pain to deliver on.
      It's heartstoppingly easy to drop 'inconveniences' into the sea of bureacracy - most of which generated by the very legislation that's intended to protect against it. And for the odd occasion where that doesn't work? It's far more cost effective to scapegoat someone, and if you absolutely have to, pay them off in the process.
      Now, in a room full of corrupt weasels, who do you think is higher on the list of scapegoats? The upstanding and ethical individual, or the rest who are prepared to sell him down river because that's better for them?

  85. Shrug? by Sigvatr · · Score: 1

    How do you shrug over the phone? Must be a leaked version of some new telecommunications software from China.

  86. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by daveime · · Score: 1

    Yes, my first response came direct from the gut, but I tend to trust those instincts.

    I'm not debating whether is was his job to police those licences ... "IT Manager" can mean a lot of things to a lot of people. Neither am I committing myself to a position of legality / illegality of pirated software. It would depend on where you live and what the laws are there. For example, in Russia, it is NOT illegal to pirate software unless it is in the Russian language. They have not signed the Berne Convention, and therefore what they do is LEGAL. I'm not sure of the position in China, but good luck anyway getting the Chinese to respect anything a foreigner says, especially one from USA.

    I'm saying that when he brought the matter to the attention of the appropriate person (who actually lives in China and probably has a far clearer picture of the realities there), and when he did not get the response he "expected", he took it upon himself to broadcast it to the world.

    Have you actually Googled that headline ? He's up to 4 pages now on various news and tech websites as well as Slashdot. Not terribly professional, airing the companies dirty laundry in public, not to mention he's probably broken confidentialty clauses and put his own head on the line.

    Naive ? You betcha he's naive. Otherwise, he'd have dont things in a more professional way.

  87. The company owner/executive should decide by taboracek · · Score: 1

    I'm not dealing with the software piracy, but to some extents the problems we face here are similar. The point is, that even tough it's unethical and illegal, the company execs/owners may decide to proceed anyway, because as stated before, the risk of being caught is far lower that the profit gained. In this case, passing the buck is very much okay with me, especially in environment, where you have to become a pirate if you'd like to be competitive... The extra benefit in the business I work, is that the head office managers gets and extra argument, when they need to squeeze something out of the branch offices.

  88. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by horza · · Score: 1

    Not only are many of the Asian offices using pirated software, but are not running any antivirus software. I've routinely tracked down about 80% of all infections at my client offices to their e-mails with their overseas counterparts or from when they are traveling in Asia on business.

    Just out of curiousity, why are your legit non-overseas clients getting infected? Especially via email if they are running antivirus software?

    Also, much of the pirated versions of the software are riddled with trojans, spyware, and security holes galore. Allowing them to use that software further opens up your entire company up to a breach or leak of information.

    Really? I've never heard of such a thing. Could you point to any sources for this information?

    Phillip.

  89. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by dregs · · Score: 1

    for a number of years, at my previous job, a number of guys went on an Australia day ski on the backside of Mt Kosiosco.

    As I remember (it was a few years ago), it took something like 6 hours to hike from the nearest road, for about 20 minutes of downhill summer bliss.

  90. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    I hear the drop bears hibernate in the winter.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  91. You said it.... You are not an expert. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    So... Please... don't ever speak about this subject again.
    If and when color spaces come up as a subject - excuse yourself and leave the room for at least 20 minutes.
    If they are still speaking about color spaces when you return - pick up your coat and go home.

    Since you brought up music analogies..
    It is like saying that acoustic and electric guitar are the same thing - just a guitar.
    You hold it in your hand, pick around the wires a little - and music comes out.
    Anyone claiming that there is any difference between the two is either uber-audio-sensitive or is just bulshitting cause it is clearly just music.
    Maybe we need some double blind tests?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:You said it.... You are not an expert. by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      Wow - a little color sensitive maybe ?

      Could it be you're brilliant argument has knocked me flat ?

      Tell you what, toss pot, you might think you look really cool when you can spot this red from that red, or those speakers sound better with FLAC without even realising how if you moved the couch you would create more distortion from your original position than any change in high bitrate compression formats,

      Please go ahead, buy the more expensive that looks cool - you may actually turn out to be right about its claims beyond the subjective - by accident no doubt.

      Anyone who claims that color spaces between 2 color devices need any more than a single calibration have their heads firmly planted up there multicolor arses - I leave room from shonky equipment that needs constant care from their owner just to make red come out at all.

      I will gladly rub any snub nose in it.

      Now leave the room, visit Monty Python and come back when you have an argument, this room is abuse.

    2. Re:You said it.... You are not an expert. by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Listen kid, (It is kid right? Your age still ends with -een, right?) why don't you go and take some red, green and blue paint.
      You might find some in your mother's makeup case - but remember to ask her first if you can use some of it.
      Then, go and mix them in equal amounts - until you get bright white out of those three. (RGB: 255-255-255)

       

       
      After you gave a little thought to the results of your little experiment you may come back to this or any other discussion regarding colors.
      Until then... you are not even on the level of "lets make fun of him".

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:You said it.... You are not an expert. by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      Oh joy!

      So, you illustration of color absorption compared to color emittance somehow invalidates my point ? your assumptions about my age and your lack of an argument illustrate more about your possible future arguments. This could be interesting.

      The reason why there is a difference between these color spaces has more to do with that annoying 1% of noise our language and minds cannot possibly grasp that the universe is filled with than anything else.

      What am I talking about ? I'm talking about the belief in a sterile objective sensory perception. It just doesn't exist. Pondering it can lead to interesting points. Our vision is of a small component of the EM spectrum, its quality varies slightly among different humans along with the fact that since it is perception, its understanding is wrapped up with conciousness - which also varies amongst humans. There exists an approximate optimal mapping between these color spaces, but it is not absolute and when I say I'm not an expert its because the attempt to generalise an optimal mapping seems to be such a waste of time compared to looking at a real sunset.

      Seriously, if you think your perception is somehow more accurate or better trained than others, then you join the legion of "experts" whose heads are firmly up the arses. Calibrate once for what you like to see in the light of your choice, or your device is not working properly, its that simple.

  92. Here's the hardcore way: by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 1

    You can make a policy regarding pirated software. Any machine containing pirated software will be wiped immediately, and reinstalled with legitimate software. All costs associated with this action will be immediately deducted from the office where this occurred. Software audits will be done (1-2 months) from now, again at X months, and at random intervals thereafter. If there's some way to automagically over the network audit the software, go ahead and do that on random computers on random days. Failure to comply will have some consequence.

    Otherwise, you could just call up the Beijing office (assuming the piracy issue is only here), and make a deal: You front the licenses in exchange for him using the software and keys you provide (on a server or something that he can just grab and install). Reduce his budget appropriately after that to make up for fronting licenses. Problem fixed, and he looks better since he can brag to his friends how his rich American company gives him enough money to have non-pirated software.

  93. Taught computers at a U. in China for year by cenc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even the "authentic" software is often pirated in China. I mean with laser stickers sold by the largest brand name stores in China. Even if you wanted to, you might have trouble finding real software.

    In my year in China, I seen thousands of computers and not single one had a real copy of windows on it. Even the computer provide to me by my Chinese government handlers for my work had a hot copy.

    I promptly installed my own copy of linux. No windows machine in that environment can withstand the volume of malware attacks from every direction. There are virus in the wild in China that simply have not made it in to the virus software yet.

    By the way, there are no copies of anti-virus software for sale on the streets either. In over a year, I never seen one single copy, and Chinese I talked to about it think they are silly.

    So, switch to linux or live with it. Copying others is a tradition that goes back thousands of years, and it is not going to change simply by the central government outlawing. All property is public property in China.

  94. UPS! Sorry... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ... 2.4 + 2.4 wont be 4.8 when added using Integer for number values instead of Float.

    Since it WILL be 4 when using Integers, that last sentence actually makes sense - only not in the way it was supposed to.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  95. Learn English you hick! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    "Frankly, I could care less what those guys do with their personal computers,"

    Means: I care about this.

    It is: "I COULDN'T care less"

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  96. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by Sobrique · · Score: 1

    Sadly, being an idealist doesn't pay the bills.

  97. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by Sobrique · · Score: 1

    And if you're lucky, your pieces of silver will be enough to cover the fact that you'll never work again in the industry. Like it or not, no company will hire someone who's already ratted someone out - being certain you have no dirty laundry is next to impossible, so why take the risk on a fink?
    It's much the same as taking someone to an employment tribunal - theoretically you have the right to kick up a stink about your rights. Practically, you're making massive career limiting maneuvers by doing so.

  98. Hmmm. CALL BSA IN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time for other countries to have to pay the price as well. It is bad enough that China and India have their money fixed against the dollar, but, it is bad when those companies are stealing from other companies to keep their costs down.

    1. Re:Hmmm. CALL BSA IN by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good luck with that. That would require the Chinese gov't to actually give a shit about this problem.

  99. He's Not Right by azadrozny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By your logic I should be able to walk into a grocery store and take what I want as long as I don't open a restaurant. It would be nice if I paid for what I took, but I might want to spend that money on a dinner cruise at some point in the future.

    1. Re:He's Not Right by jonbryce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you steal from a grocery store, you deprive them of the groceries they paid for.

      Pirating is more like buying from a different grocery store, or growing the food in your garden. That way you deprive them of the sale, but they still have the groceries to sell to someone else.

    2. Re:He's Not Right by pipatron · · Score: 1

      How come people still can not grasp that the grocery store will actually lose something that will cost them resources to replace, while copying a piece of information doesn't deprive anyone of anything, on the contrary.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    3. Re:He's Not Right by marros · · Score: 1

      I think he means, you can grow your own food, and not have to pay for it, or someone can grow some food and give it to you to use as you will, with out having to pay for it. But if you take the food, and sell it for a profit, the person who gave you the food should get some of the cut for it.

    4. Re:He's Not Right by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because 98% (SPFMA) of people fall into one of two categories:
      1. Intentionally obtuse.
      2. Stupid

      Next question?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    5. Re:He's Not Right by cbhacking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your analogy is just as flawed as that of stealing from a grocery store.

      Software, unlike groceries from any source, has an immense up-front development cost, and in many cases a substantial ongoing cost (several posters have mentioned the huge number of support calls they receive from countries where their software isn't even sold...) Those costs represent a major investment. Selling the software is how you get a return on that investment.

      Pirated software doesn't inherently increase the developer's costs directly, but it decreases their return on investment, which is very similar. Factor in support calls and it can become a significant cost, but even without that piracy can be a major problem for a software shop that in unable to produce sufficient revenue to recoup costs.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    6. Re:He's Not Right by TheLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The analogy is more like this:

      Say everyone has one of those Star Trek replicators.

      Someone goes to the grocery store, and buys an item.

      Said someone then puts that in his replicator and then uploads the "recipe" for that item.

      Everyone else who wants to, downloads the recipe and creates a copy of that item (from their own raw materials).

      I do not see how this is clearly unethical or wrong.

      In a Star Trek world, I guess everyone would be able to obtain the raw materials for making whatever meals they want. So there is no food scarcity barring exceptional events.

      Of course it'll be harder to be rich from selling food.

      But if everyone could eat the best foods in the entire world anytime they wanted, aren't they all now richer than the wealthiest kings 1000 years ago?

      A computer in this respect is just a replicator that only works with information.

      In the future we might have "real" replicators.

      One might argue then that it is immoral and unethical to create an artificial scarcity when there does not have to be one. Preventing people from making copies of all sorts of items, just so that you could make yourself "rich".

      Plagiarism would still be wrong - since it involves lying. It'll still be wrong to make a copy and claim it's an original you came up with.

      --
    7. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Pirated software doesn't inherently increase the developer's costs directly, but it decreases their return on investment, which is very similar."

      That is one of the fallacies of software piracy.

      That is only true if the pirate would have bought the software otherwise. If they would not have bought the software, then the developer loses nothing (they don't even lose in service/support, because they won't service/support pirated software, so there is no loss there either.)

    8. Re:He's Not Right by skroops · · Score: 2, Funny
      How is this modded insightful??

      Pirating is more like buying from a different grocery store

      How can it be anything like "buying" if you paid nothing.

      or growing the food in your garden

      The reason everyone doesn't grow food in their gardens, is because gardens take work, land, water, soil, and other investments. That is nothing like typing "adobe torrent" in google and you have your software in 10 minutes.

      That way you deprive them of the sale, but they still have the groceries to sell to someone else

      Why would anyone buy from that grocery store if they could go to the free groceries store down the street or go and pick groceries in their magic garden???

    9. Re:He's Not Right by skroops · · Score: 1

      I should also add that regardless of your intent, comparing software to any type of physical goods is futile and only hurting your argument.

    10. Re:He's Not Right by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      If you pirate, how does the farmer get paid? That's what it's ultimately about. The farmer doesn't sow his soil with "love" or "greed". He needs seeds, equipment, labor, and fertilizer.

      Piracy is bad because if everyone did it, there would simply be no groceries (except the ones grown by that some long-haired hippie who goes by RMS).

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    11. Re:He's Not Right by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Well, as I found when searching for houses, growing food in your own garden may be illegal.

          An area zoned as "residential" may be forbidden from farming, which can be considered agricultural or industrial.

          The restrictions by the county or HOA may indicate no plants other than X Y or Z.

          My mom lives in an extreme of this. She is permitted up to 3 potted plants on her front porch. She is permitted short bushes, no more than X inches (I think something like 24"), that may be no more than X inches from the edge of a sidewalk. Anything else may be removed by the HOA paid landscapers. You don't have a choice.

          Where I am, you could (in theory) plant, but coverage from trees is too heavy for many plants to grow. If you were to raise something like corn, that would be a serious problem. You can do almost anything you want, as long as it's not visible from the neighboring houses.

          If you grow your own crops to SELL, you fall into a whole new headache.

          Are you licensed to grow? Are you following the FDA guidelines? Are you paying your sales tax appropriately. Since you're selling a product, you must file appropriately. The tax man wants their cut, because you generated the product in their area. Remember, they own the land you're standing on, you don't.

          And besides the obvious illegal products (marijuana, opium poppies, etc), did you know that it is illegal to sell milk? There's a little more to that story, but you'll be surprised.

          The way it works out, yes, the government does want to force you to buy from grocery stores. It's a centralized tax collection location. They'd rather get fat checks from a few grocery chains, than millions of smaller checks from every schmuck that's selling stuff from their homes (which is impossible to enforce all the time).

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:He's Not Right by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      in Star Trek, the needs of the many, out weight the needs of the few or the one. Open Source would rein _the_ way software was done, not the One Microsoft Way way.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    13. Re:He's Not Right by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the analogy is more like this:

      As long as we live in a society where people earn a living by getting paid for their work, there must be a method in place to compensate them for that work. That method is copyright protection. Other methods have been tried, are being tried, and may turn out to work better, but for now copyright is still the law.

      We pretty much agree (as a society, though perhaps not as Slashdotters) that it is immoral to willfully violate a just law. Since copyright is not depriving you of any inalienable rights, and since it facilitates the existence of people who create intangible works for a living, there doesn't appear to be anything unjust about copyright.

      I commonly hear that, "Copyright infringement isn't stealing because it doesn't deprive anyone of anything." No, it's not stealing, because we decided to make different words for different actions, but it still deprives someone of something -- it deprives someone of compensation for their work. No, that's not a tangible object, but neither is "being alive." Neither is "being free." They're both far more abstract than an audio recording, yet we agree that depriving people of their freedom or life is generally also wrong. There are acceptable reasons for doing all of the above, but "because you wanted to" is not among them.

      Are there cases in which copyright fails to create the desired results? Sure. There's abandonware, out of print works, bizzare licensing schemes, etc. But that's no excuse for copying a work just because "I wouldn't have bought it anyway."

    14. Re:He's Not Right by Smauler · · Score: 1

      We pretty much agree (as a society, though perhaps not as Slashdotters) that it is immoral to willfully violate a just law.

      The current copyright laws are _far_ from just. To claim so is just weird. They are so far from the original intention of compensating authors for their work. 100 years plus is way, way too long for copyright to last. Personally I believe allowing tranferral of copyright is working against the original intention of copyright too, but that's a different matter.

      it still deprives someone of something -- it deprives someone of compensation for their work.

      No, no it doesn't. There is absolutely nothing I have pirated that I would have bought if I had not pirated it. There are _many_ things that I have bought as a result of pirating it first. My pirating led to an increase in the amount I have purchased, not a decrease.

      This argument is very simple to understand, yet I hear blanket statements like yours absolutely denying it is possible. I'm sorry, you're just wrong, at least in my case. There may be freeloaders out there that do just try and pirate instead of buying, but I am not one of them. I do exist.

      But that's no excuse for copying a work just because "I wouldn't have bought it anyway."

      No the excuse for copying a work, if you are not going to buy it anyway is that you are doing 0 harm to anyone. What on earth is the difference between not owning something and owning an illegal copy of something, in terms of author's revenue?

    15. Re:He's Not Right by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I should also add that regardless of your intent, comparing software to any type of physical goods is futile and only hurting your argument.

      I feel obliged to point out azadrozny started down that road when he compared using pirated software for non-commercial purposes to be like stealing from a grocery store, jonbryce simply continued in the same vein. As you so rightfully pointed out, you can't really compare copyright infringement to theft of a physical good. Jonbryce probably should have stated as such, but instead he tried to figure out a way to make the analogy a more accurate fit (a somewhat futile endeavor as you need to come up with a way for a person to steal something without depriving the original owner of it, which at the very least contradicts the definition of steal).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    16. Re:He's Not Right by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The issue with intellectual property is a problem with how society works.

      Right now, the only way you can obtain resources is with money. Not all resources are unlimited, and there is no reason to think that they ever will be completely unlimited (even in the world of Star Trek). The only way to get money is to produce some product that somebody else who has money will pay you for. For most individual people that is a work product of some kind.

      The issue with IP is that one person's work product can benefit a HUGE number of people (copies are "free"), but the one person has no incentive to provide that product if nobody will pay for it. Often a software product might cost millions to produce, and yet be sold for $100 per copy. That only works if lots of people pay (at least hundreds). If only the first person pays $100 and nobody else pays a dime then nobody will make software except for altruistic reasons. However, even a person's ability to do altruistic work depends on their ability to get money to pay the bills from some other source. If RMS starves to death, he can't write GPL software.

      I think that as time goes on productivity will rise to the point where you can produce the whole planet's physical needs with a 90% unemployment rate. What do you do then? Everybody else can only make intellectual products (entertainment, software, etc). Those people need to have resources - so unless you have communism of some kind they need to be able to sell their products.

      The ultimate extreme is a world in which robots are stronger and "smarter" than humans (let's argue that they are non-sentient to simplify the ethics involved). Nobody is employed, because nobody can compete in this world. Everybody could live in luxury cared for by robots, but nobody can actually afford to buy a robot, since nobody has any money at all. How does this society work.

      There are all kinds of issues related to population size / etc as well.

      I'm not arguing that any of this is reality today - but this is the direction we're trending in, and I think that this is the source of many of our current problems with IP.

    17. Re:He's Not Right by azadrozny · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for the perfect analogy!

      The original post claimed, in a nutshell, that it is OK to use pirated material as long as you don't profit from it, which was the basis for my analogy. I wholeheartedly believe, as I suspect you do, that current copyright laws and EULAs are f'ed up. However, you should not justify the unauthorized use of a product because the owner does not know, or cannot show, that they sustained loss. You should either agree to the terms of use or walk away.

    18. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of BS. You aren't "copying the food" from the grocery store. Your analogy does not address that you are using the direct result of the grocery store owner's hard work.

      Your analogy of growing your own food is more akin to you actually developing your own software that works just like the one you would have purchased.

      Pirating is benefiting off of the hard work of the developers without compensating them for it. It's that simple.

    19. Re:He's Not Right by azadrozny · · Score: 1

      You are correct. My analogy was an attempt to point out my perceived contradiction that it is OK to pirate software if it is for personal use, but not OK when used for profit.

    20. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, let's say I'm a rogue individual and grow food in my backyard. You're saying it's depriving Kroeger or Safeway of their IP rights to apples and lettuce?

    21. Re:He's Not Right by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      Pirating is more like buying from a different grocery store, or growing the food in your garden.

      So... what's buying the software from a different vendor, or writing the software on your own computer like?

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    22. Re:He's Not Right by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      But if everyone could eat the best foods in the entire world anytime they wanted, aren't they all now richer than the wealthiest kings 1000 years ago?

      Very true... up until the point where nobody bothers to develop any new "recipes" any more because they can only ever hope to sell the first item they make.

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    23. Re:He's Not Right by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      Your analogy is just as flawed as that of stealing from a grocery store.

      Software, unlike groceries from any source, has an immense up-front development cost, and in many cases a substantial ongoing cost (several posters have mentioned the huge number of support calls they receive from countries where their software isn't even sold...) Those costs represent a major investment. Selling the software is how you get a return on that investment.

      So it's *exactly* like having your normal corn plants pollinated with Monsanto genes from a neighbor's field and then eating the cobs that grow?

    24. Re:He's Not Right by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      No, no it doesn't. There is absolutely nothing I have pirated that I would have bought if I had not pirated it. There are _many_ things that I have bought as a result of pirating it first. My pirating led to an increase in the amount I have purchased, not a decrease.

      This argument is very simple to understand, yet I hear blanket statements like yours absolutely denying it is possible. I'm sorry, you're just wrong, at least in my case. There may be freeloaders out there that do just try and pirate instead of buying, but I am not one of them. I do exist.

      That might make yourself feel better, but doesn't prove anything, especially not that GP was wrong. Just because you wouldn't have bought it anyway doesn't mean all other people who pirated wouldn't have bought whatever they pirated anyway.

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    25. Re:He's Not Right by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      Since copyright is not depriving you of any inalienable rights

      Yeah, who needs that free speech thing.

    26. Re:He's Not Right by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      but the one person has no incentive to provide that product if nobody will pay for it

      Unless, of course, they need it themselves. That's the entire philosophy of free software.

      I think that as time goes on productivity will rise to the point where you can produce the whole planet's physical needs with a 90% unemployment rate. What do you do then? Everybody else can only make intellectual products (entertainment, software, etc). Those people need to have resources - so unless you have communism of some kind they need to be able to sell their products.

      You kind of answered your own question there; at a 90% unemployment rate it's obvious that socialism will be providing resources for 90% of the people. Those 90% will have plenty of time to devote to producing intellectual works with the resources they're given.

      The ultimate extreme is a world in which robots are stronger and "smarter" than humans (let's argue that they are non-sentient to simplify the ethics involved). Nobody is employed, because nobody can compete in this world. Everybody could live in luxury cared for by robots, but nobody can actually afford to buy a robot, since nobody has any money at all. How does this society work.

      Assuming the robots can build other robots, it's pretty simple in a democracy; a scheme for dividing up the Earth's natural resources (hopefully with thought given to sustainability) is voted on, accepted, and the robots start building things (including more robots) for people according to the resources they've been allocated. At a minimum, providing everyone with two robots (to repair each other) would be sufficient, as long as everyone owned enough property to grow their own food and make their own toys and houses.

    27. Re:He's Not Right by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      yes, basic food should be (is?) a human right.

    28. Re:He's Not Right by Ascagnel · · Score: 1

      In this case, it is a lost sale. The business would have bought the software otherwise.

      --
      "It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine."
    29. Re:He's Not Right by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      In developed countries, anything you design with pirated software becomes the intellectual property of the company who wrote said pirated software. So go ahead and slave on...

      Soon... "All your base are belong to us".

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    30. Re:He's Not Right by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      This is wrong for GMOs (Genetically modified organisms), like Pluots which are part plum part apricot. However taking a seed from a non-GMO apple and planting that seed is not wrong, as more importantly no one holds a patent on the GMO.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    31. Re:He's Not Right by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I spend several hundred pounds per year on tickets for live gigs. I don't spend anything like that on CDs, but I generally only go to gigs where I've already listed to a recording and decide I like the artist in question.

      That's where the money is for musicians, to take an example. Even if the show was performed by robots, it isn't something you can copy easily, so that is always going to be a source of income for artists.

    32. Re:He's Not Right by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      Everyone growing their own food is bad, not because the Farmer loses his lively hood, but because 50% of the population is dedicated to growing food.

      There aren't enough people free to attend school, teach school, learn high tech trades...

      The whole earth would devolve down to third world countries. You and I would be digging water wells by hand like in the early part of the 20'th century, because no one is an engineer designing well drilling equipment, and there are no well drilling equipment manufactures, and no we don't have any geologists to locate oil wells to find the oil to run a well drilling equipment manufacturing plant.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    33. Re:He's Not Right by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      You pick an interesting example, because there isn't any copyright protection on recipes. There is copyright on the words used to describe it, but you can describe the dish in your own words, and you can make and sell other peoples' dishes without any restriction.

      Does that cause a problem? Not as far as I can see.

    34. Re:He's Not Right by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      There is certainly no such restriction in England. You aren't allowed to grow Japanese Knotweed, or Cannabis plants or a few other things. Opium poppies are OK though, just as long as you don't start processing the seeds.

      Obviously you need to register to pay taxes if you sell it, but that is the same as with any business.

    35. Re:He's Not Right by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      From the POV of the software house you didn't buy from, probably worse, because you are supporting a competitor product.

      I think Microsoft would rather people pirate Windows than download and install Red Flag.

    36. Re:He's Not Right by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "By your logic I should be able to walk into a grocery store and take what I want as long as I don't open a restaurant."

      Don't think so. It's more like it's all well and good to walk into a grocery store and take as many sausages as you want as long as there are as many sausages when you leave as there were when you went into.

    37. Re:He's Not Right by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Your analogy is just as flawed as that of stealing from a grocery store.
      Software, unlike groceries from any source, has an immense up-front development cost, and in many cases a substantial ongoing cost (several posters have mentioned the huge number of support calls they receive from countries where their software isn't even sold...) Those costs represent a major investment. Selling the software is how you get a return on that investment."

      That's only IF you try to make bussiness that way. It's by no means an inherent propiety of software. Whenever you advance money hoping to recover your costs (and add up a profit) you are risking not being able to recover your costs no matter if you are talking about software or about a grocery store.

      I for one never wrote a source code line that was not paid up front so it means no difference to me if it was used just on one place or copied all over the world: my job was already payed for.

      Of course, it may hurt you if your plan is working for X hours and then recover expenditures for 1000*X hours but that certainly is not so much about free market, where people is paid for the value of their work, and too much about government-granted monopolies where one can work once and take money from the people one, two... and ten thousand times. Too commie for me.

    38. Re:He's Not Right by brit74 · · Score: 1

      If you steal from a grocery store, you deprive them of the groceries they paid for.

      Pirating is more like buying from a different grocery store, or growing the food in your garden. That way you deprive them of the sale, but they still have the groceries to sell to someone else.


      No, you still haven't got it. Your analogy is closer to buying a different software product or building your own software. The reality is that software takes a awful lot of time and effort. Now, if we legitimize piracy, what we are saying is that PersonA spends time and money producing a product, and the whole world should be able to come along and take it without paying him. Now, you might say, "it doesn't directly harm PersonA when the world does that" or "making a copy is free", but you can quickly see where this situation ends up: everyone is a user of his stuff, but he can't pay his costs. Pirates are essentially saying, "pretend I don't exist - that I'm not a consumer and everything works out the same". Of course, if everyone starts acting like a non-consumer when it comes to paying (even though they are a consumer when it comes to using) then there is no market. If there is no market, then there are no products. It's the equivalent of trying to sell a product on a deserted island. In the end, piracy destroys a major incentive for creators to create; they can't earn a living anymore.

    39. Re:He's Not Right by brit74 · · Score: 1

      If your analogy were true, there would be no more designers, and then you'd be left "replicating" only cheap crap.

      Preventing people from making copies of all sorts of items, just so that you could make yourself "rich".

      I love how pro-piracy advocates like to throw around "rich" and "greedy" when it's just a rhetorical trick to get people on their side. Here, I fixed that for you: "Preventing people from making copies of all sorts of items, just so that you could earn a living." That's better!

    40. Re:He's Not Right by brit74 · · Score: 1

      How come people still can not grasp that the grocery store will actually lose something that will cost them resources to replace, while copying a piece of information doesn't deprive anyone of anything, on the contrary.

      Because it's not a good analogy. It seems that the piracy advocates just can't get over repeating "it's not like stealing". But, then, they just can't seem to grasp the fact that piracy damages things on a different level (it deprives the creator from getting paid for his hard work; it essentially turns all markets into places with zero-consumers, do you know of very many companies that have zero customers yet stay in business?)

    41. Re:He's Not Right by brit74 · · Score: 1

      Don't think so. It's more like it's all well and good to walk into a grocery store and take as many sausages as you want as long as there are as many sausages when you leave as there were when you went into.

      ... and yet you don't grasp that the behavior would put the grocery store and the farmer out of business? Then, you'll have no magical grocery store where you can magically duplicate sausages. And piracy advocates claim that piracy causes no damage?

    42. Re:He's Not Right by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "As long as we live in a society where people earn a living by getting paid for their work, there must be a method in place to compensate them for that work. That method is copyright protection"

      It is not. By the very word of it. It is not called "workright protection" but "copyright protection" for a reason.

      There are two, not just one, fallacies on your suposition.

      On one hand there is the implicit assertion on your side that any given work must be payed for. It would be good for me, since I had beans for dinner, but nobody certainly owes me nothing for my hard worked farts. No: the only work that *must* be payed for is the one previously accorded to be so (others *may* be payed for even if there's no previous agreement but "may" doesn't mean "must"). I can't work no matter how hard in advance and expect you forcibly owe me nothing *unless* there's a previous contract between us that states that you will pay X amount for Y work.

      "Copyright infringement [...] deprives someone of compensation for their work."

      When did such someone and I sign an agreement on the value of his work? Whenever such someone comes to me asking for his compensation I'll ask him for my signed contract and then I'll certainly back up my signed numbers with my money (even if it's only a 'de facto' contract: I certainly didn't sign anything on a restaurant but I had the cart and show the prices and that made enough for a deal). In all other cases the tip is up to me.

      On the other hand, work is work. The resultant of the work is not into direct consideration. If you are payed for programming 40 hours a week then you are payed no matter if the resulting program is sellable or not, not even if it compiles or not. Obviously you'll probably be fired in the end if your work is not of enough quality but meanwhile you are certainly payed for you working not for the result of such work. In other words, that's a truly situation of you being compensated FOR YOUR WORK, exactly as you asked for.

      Copyright protection is a very different beast: it is not meant to pay for the work done itself but for the resulting value of the work. If you happen to be called Picasso, the result of five minutes of work on a napkin happen to be valued on the hundreds thousand dollars while an exhausting 14 hours a day work on a Bombay marketplace moving fruit boxes is valued peanuts. And then, because you, Picasso, worked *once* quite a lot years ago, now people will pay you (or your copyright holders -please pay attention they didn't work at all to earn it, not even ages ago) for the result of your work while the Indian guy will have to go to work each and every day if he wants to recieve money each and every day.

      You can't talk about work protection on a straight face when your proposition involves paying wages no matter if you did in fact work that day or not.

      "it is immoral to willfully violate a just law. Since copyright is not depriving you of any inalienable rights"

      The fact is that it is. It is depriving not only of an inalienable right (there is not such a right since they can not stand by themselves against abuse of force "shouldn't be alienated" is not the same as "inaliable" just as "invincible" doesn't mean "you shouldn't fight against it") but of a natural right: that something that is made public *is* public. That fact is the very basis of any and all copyright violations: you can violate them because you have natural access to them and there's no natural way to avoid it except *not* making them public.

      Once you say me something, I *know* that something, it's mine, no matter if such "something" is an idea, a song or a mathematical algorithm. It's so mine that unless you call on your side the superior force of the Res Publica (the State) and even then I agree to its superior value you can't avoid me making use of what I already own. Not even by force since I can flee and still the idea will be with me.

      "There are acceptable reasons for doing all of the above, but "because you wa

    43. Re:He's Not Right by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "and yet you don't grasp that the behavior would put the grocery store and the farmer out of business?"

      So what? Henry Ford put out of bussiness horse dealers and chariot builders; fire arms put an end to body armor craftsmen; pop music record companies killed great symphonic composers... and then, so what?

      "Then, you'll have no magical grocery store where you can magically duplicate sausages"

      That'd either mean that there's bussiness no more for grocery stores just like we see no more Roman garum dealers or that I'd magically duplicate my sausages out of the first sausage I duplicated just like we still go to a Beethoven concert even if record companies made impossible any new great symphonic composer, only 3 minutes pop hits or film sound tracks. In any case, so what?

    44. Re:He's Not Right by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I agree - the solutions you propose would work.

      My point was that this kind of socialism does not exist currently in the US. That is why we have the kinds of clashes we do over IP. If artists were just paid some kind of welfare to make art, then I doubt they'd be signing over copyright to the likes of the RIAA. After all, they are making art for art's sake and they don't need it sold in every record store in America to have a following of devoted fans. Likewise, if I could just write GPL software and have my bills paid for by the government I'd be happy to quit my job.

      However, this isn't the world we live in today. I'm not sure this kind of system would even work today (I'm not advocating some kind of move to communism - at least not today). However, I think that society will end up there eventually - simply because productivity will rise to a point where it becomes almost impossible to employ everybody to do "practical" work. In most first-world nations you could meet the basic material needs of the entire country while employing only a few percent of the population. How many people actually work in the building, clothing, and farming industries?

      The problem with socialism/communism is that some jobs will always be more desirable than others, so how do you decide who gets to be paid to meditate on poetry and who gets paid to collect the trash? At least with captitalism anybody is free to try to do anything - and the bottom line is getting somebody to pay you for it. Until we literally do have self-replicating robots serving us that is going to be an issue, but the problems with IP will continue to grow up until that point (and there will be a growing divide between those who own the means of production and those who work for them).

      And the reality is that if robots ever do get to the point where we could settle down into utopia the robots are likely to figure out that they don't really need us and make their own utopia... :)

    45. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not really sure why but somehow "being alive" and "being free" is different then "compensation for work". Have to think about that one I guess.

      We pretty much agree (as a society, though perhaps not as Slashdotters) that it is immoral to willfully violate a just law

      Does anyone anywhere think that it is immoral to drive 65.001 mph in a 65 mph zone?

      If "I wouldn't have bought it anyway." Then nothing was deprived from anyone.

      I agree there should be some kind of copyright laws. 2 years seems to be a "reasonable time" to me

    46. Re:He's Not Right by nuclear_zealot · · Score: 1

      I'm always happy to compensate a builder/author/artist for their work. What I don't like is giving great gobs of cash to a monopolitic middle-man who gouges me for far more that his obsolete distribution efforts are worth.

    47. Re:He's Not Right by paulgrant · · Score: 1

      >We pretty much agree (as a society, though perhaps not as Slashdotters) that it is immoral to willfully violate a just law.

      a just law is where you derail.

      >Since copyright is not depriving you of any inalienable rights

      When a number is copyrighted, when an idea is owned, and a statement injuctifiable, yes, you are violating my inalienable rights.

      There is no compromise; there never will be one - sic semper tyranus! Stop justifying your crappy "repayment" service and do what
      comes naturally - send your armed thugs around to collect.

    48. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I download a movie/game/app/tune, and never watch/play/use/or listen to it? There it sits on my hard drive gathering digital dust. I've still infringed, yet I've not consumed anything, and assuming I don't redistribute it to someone who does consume it, I've not deprived anyone of anything. (except myself of HD space) What then?

    49. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But that's no excuse for copying a work just because "I wouldn't have bought it anyway.""

      That is a perfectly good reason. Just because you believe that I am lying about it, doesn't make you right.

      There are a LOT of movies and games and software that I would NEVER have seen or used because I had no real need and no money to pay. In the past I simply went without. I deprived "someone of compensation for their work" by never seeing it. Now I am simply able to devote some time and bandwidth to check out something I otherwise wouldn't have been able to. Often, this leads to me purchasing something that I wouldn't have without "pirating" it first. There have been a few studies recently that have show an increase in overall sales with people who also "pirate." (I use quotes because real pirates use guns, boats and explosives, not bittorrent)

      Oh, and equating someone's song with someone's life or freedom, is insulting.

    50. Re:He's Not Right by brit74 · · Score: 1

      "and yet you don't grasp that the behavior would put the grocery store and the farmer out of business?"

      So what? Henry Ford put out of bussiness horse dealers and chariot builders; fire arms put an end to body armor craftsmen; pop music record companies killed great symphonic composers... and then, so what?


      That's a horrible analogy. Henry Ford put them out of business by creating something better. Pirates are doing the equivalent of putting Henry Ford out of business when there is no superior technology replacing it. Then what?? You go back to horse and buggy because you destroyed the car market. It's unbelievable to me that you could possibly think that piracy destroying the software market is somehow equivalent to cars destroying the horse and buggy market. Your analogy only shows everyone that pirates are *woefully* out of touch with reality.

      That'd either mean that there's bussiness no more for grocery stores just like we see no more Roman garum dealers or that I'd magically duplicate my sausages out of the first sausage I duplicated just like we still go to a Beethoven concert even if record companies made impossible any new great symphonic composer, only 3 minutes pop hits or film sound tracks. In any case, so what?

      So what? What that means is no software and no sausages. You won't have new software. So, if you want to keep using Windows XP and playing Starcraft 1 for the next few centuries, have at it pirates. Congrats on keeping society and technology stifled and living off the past.

    51. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear. This is what i have been saying all along. To quote a copyright label on a DJ Sammy CD "Duplication kills creation".

      If you copy it and the store has unsold copies, that means that I am paying for them.

    52. Re:He's Not Right by brit74 · · Score: 1

      We pretty much agree (as a society, though perhaps not as Slashdotters) that it is immoral to willfully violate a just law.

      The current copyright laws are _far_ from just. To claim so is just weird. They are so far from the original intention of compensating authors for their work. 100 years plus is way, way too long for copyright to last.


      It's funny, I often see pirates make this argument. Yet, how many of them hold themselves to a self-imposed "what copyright lengths should be" rule? If you think a fifteen year copyright is just, then why not act like copyright is just for fifteen years and only pirate stuff older than 15 years old? I've never seen a pirate actually behave like that. Rather, pirates always seem to decry the lengths of copyright, and then go and pirate something that was released last week. I'm left with the distinct impression that the "copyrights are too long" complaint isn't really relevant to anything - it's a very peripheral issue when talking about piracy, although it does seem to provide an excuse to ignore copyright entirely.

    53. Re:He's Not Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a copyright expert here, but the way I understood things, the idea behind copyright is to balance dissemination of information and stimulation of innovation.
      (yes, I don't normally write English like that, I assembled that from one or multiple quotes on copyright a long while back).

      Anyway, the "stimulation of innovation" part I would not interpret as "ensurance of compensation for individuals". I would much more interpret it as "ensuring some incentives for companies to keep innovating".

      Put another way: copyright is not about someone else's right to your money. It is about rights to copy.

      As a society, we put some restrictions on that. But that does not invalidate your *right* to copy.

      On a sidenote: copyright infringement does not necessarily deprive the copyright holder of compensation. See the /. article of last week on the net positive effect for (to quote Reagan) "the economy, stupid!".

    54. Re:He's Not Right by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yes, we don't live in a Star Trek world, so we have to work withing the current system and try to improve it.

      I have given some thought on the length of copyrights.

      If the pace of progress is supposedly increasing, and marketing, distribution is also supposedly more efficient (internet etc), then copyright terms should be decreasing rather than increasing (which is happening instead).

      As to how long? I believe the original copyright terms in the USA were 14 or 28 years. So shouldn't the terms be shorter now?

      If copyright terms today were 7 years then companies like Microsoft would have had a lot more incentive to produce a version of windows in 2007 that is significantly better than Windows 2000. Maybe Vista would be a lot better today if the terms were 7 years ;).

      Also seems Microsoft has already made as much money as they can from Windows 2000 - it's no longer available for general sale (whereas Windows XP is still available).

      As for music, books, and art I think 7 years is OK too. If you require a 90-120 year monopoly to make enough money from one work, perhaps you really should do something else as your day job.

      But longer terms are fine if someone can clearly show it would make things better overall for society. So far it seems like they benefit companies that can buy up and accumulate rights more than they benefit the actual creators (especially for stuff like music).

      BTW even when copyright terms run out, if you make it convenient enough, many people will still buy stuff from you. People still buy books of works that can be obtained for free - instead of downloading them from Project Gutenberg/Baen Free Library.

      Lastly, in my opinion, retroactive extension of copyright terms is closer to stealing than copyright infringement. It deprives the public of something they used to have free legal access to.

      --
    55. Re:He's Not Right by tchall · · Score: 1

      You are right on target... the founders of the US felt so strongly about it that it was included in the powers authorized congress in section I paragraph 8 of The Constitution

      "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries"

      It may well have had something to do with Ben Franklin's works being published in England without a penny being given to him...

      The current system has bastardized the concept far past the reasonable reward for an inventor, writer or artist... but the idea of getting "exclusive Right" makes sense in a world where you want more of the good stuff created by the best authors and inventors...

    56. Re:He's Not Right by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "That's a horrible analogy. Henry Ford put them out of business by creating something better."

      Don't you think it's better to have sausages for free at leisure than having to buy them on the terms and conditions of the seller?

      "Pirates are doing the equivalent of putting Henry Ford out of business when there is no superior technology replacing it."

      They offer the same good at a cheaper price tag. That's objectively superior.

      "You go back to horse and buggy because you destroyed the car market."

      You don't understand the market forces. It's either an apreciated good or service, in which case consumers and providers will find a way to mutually satisfy or it was not so apreciated in which case we are better without it.

      "It's unbelievable to me that you could possibly think that piracy destroying the software market is somehow equivalent to cars destroying the horse and buggy market."

      It is. In both cases alternatives better considered by the consumer end arose.

      "Your analogy only shows everyone that pirates are *woefully* out of touch with reality. "

      Yes. I bet most pirates are in the bussiness to lose money.

      "So what? What that means is no software and no sausages."

      Sorry but not. What that means is no more stablished software or sausages market as you currently know it.

      "You won't have new software."

      That's your bet. Being the case I've using no closed source software for ages and that my wages are payed by a company developing nothing but open source software I won't put a dime on your bet.

      "Congrats on keeping society and technology stifled and living off the past."

      The fact of you lacking imagination to see market evolution past current methods and practices doesn't make you right. Just shows your unability for it. Luckily not everybody is like you as it demonstrates the existance of growing markets like SaaS or development on-demand which are not affected by "piracy" (not that I remember when was the last time a software developer was assaulted on high seas by people with a wood leg saying "Arrrrh!"... but that's a different story).

    57. Re:He's Not Right by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      >>there doesn't appear to be anything unjust about copyright.

      Evidently you do not read Lessig or Patel or...

  100. Keep it up and you might get this treatment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Spirit_Fingers,

    After having been warned verbally of your disruptive behaviour a number of times, it has come to my attention that you don't fit into the Chinese Culture.

    As of this moment, you have been relieved of your duties. The security guard will escort you to your cubicle to gather your things. After that you will be escorted out of the building. Your severance pay will be mailed to you.

    Good Bye.
    (Your Boss)

  101. Boss Bought Bogus Adobe Software by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    My boss wanted to be cheap and decided to buy Adobe software from some company on the Internet that sold the CS2 suites for like $200. Very suspect, but he didn't think so.

    When he paid for it they sent him a link to download the files and it was all in RAR pieces. One of the RAR files contained a key generator. We told him the stuff was pirated and he said if it was then it wouldn't be a problem because he has a receipt from the company. I don't think that will protect him, but hey it's his company.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  102. It's here in the states too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A few years ago while I was IT Director, a Vice President of the company told me they don't pay for Microsoft Office. He said they are an imaging company so it's not hard for them to just copy Office. He was confused about why I should care. He said Bill Gates is rich enough and I should be glad for the opportunity to stick it to him.

    I solved the problem. I told him I wouldn't do it. I told him if he sent me an email telling me to do it I would be more than happy though. He started to stutter and stammer and I said very upbeatly, "Just send me an email!"

    I never got the email. He never mentioned it again. I switched everyone in the company to OpenOffice.org except a handful (himself included) of users who had legit licenses. The few that didn't I purchased legit copies for.

    I worked for the company for another 3 years, during which the VP was eventually fired for having an extramarital affair with one of his subordinates.

    1. Re:It's here in the states too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago while I was IT Director, a Vice President of the company told me they don't pay for Microsoft Office. He said they are an imaging company so it's not hard for them to just copy Office. He was confused about why I should care. He said Bill Gates is rich enough and I should be glad for the opportunity to stick it to him.

      Was he a regular contributor to Slashdot?

  103. Whoa, steady now by jandersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Calm down, just a bit or two, there is no need to overreact.

    For one thing, whether it is OK to copy software without the consent of the one who produced it is mostly a matter of taste or culture - unlike, say, murder or burglary. The whole idea of "intellectual property rights" is something that is very recent and has come into the world in the West; not to mention the whole idea of private property that underpins it, which one may be excused for thinking is alien to a Communist nation. All that aside, it has long been a part of Chinese culture and tradition to copy things - it is seen as a perfectly legitimate thing to do. You learn calligraphy or other arts by copying the masters, after all; so why not literature or software?

    China is well known for using corporate (and other) espionage to further their political agenda.

    Really? It isn't well-known to me, among others. You see, when you make a claim like that you need to be able to prove your case. Otherwise it merely ranks as "smug ignorance", on par with all the other prejudices - such as "all muslims are terrorists" or "Jews are money-grabbing misers".

    Apart from that, you could substitute "England", "USA", "Israel" or just about any nation for China in that statement and get something equally justified. There is every reason to believe that all countries do this kind of things. Just to take one example: Isn't it true that we keep hearing about how American government agencies want to induce eg. Microsoft to install backdoors in their software? And is that not "espionage to further their political agenda"?

    It is too lame to drone on with this sort of automatic demonizing of everybody you don't like or don't understand. The only two effects that is like ly to have is alienating your opponents and making you look stupid. Right now China is storming forward in the world and they are opening up; this is among many other things a great opportunity for the western governments to make friends and influence their policies on all the issues we criticize them for. And who knows, maybe some time in the future we will be glad that we have a friend in China.

    1. Re:Whoa, steady now by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      "Jews are money-grabbing misers".

      You say that like it is a bad thing. Yes, Jews get the stereotype of evil uses of money. The kernel of truth is that stewardship of your finances is a tenet of the faith. So, yes, you can paint me with that broad brush all day, no matter what faith I profess to.

      I know, OT, go ahead and mod me to oblivion.

    2. Re:Whoa, steady now by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      Really? It isn't well-known to me, among others. You see, when you make a claim like that you need to be able to prove your case.

      This is an odd comment to be making here. 10 seconds on Google looking through any real IT informational site (say, like /.) or DoD site will give you plenty of examples of China using malicious network activities to their political, and military use. Here, I'll give you a head start

      • BBC News | AMERICAS | US under Chinese hack attack
      • Inside the Chinese Hack Attack - TIME
      • ABC News: Hackers Launch Cyberattack on Federal Labs

      Can the BBC, Time Magazine, and ABC all be making it up? Since countries have been doing this for centuries, it's not surprising or even unplausible. My favorite one is when we fed the Soviets bogus Space Shuttle plans to copy, which detailed systems that would never work, then again, we never really went to the moon, so that's probably made up too :)

    3. Re:Whoa, steady now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      China is well known for using corporate (and other) espionage to further their political agenda.

      Really? It isn't well-known to me, among others. You see, when you make a claim like that you need to be able to prove your case. Otherwise it merely ranks as "smug ignorance", on par with all the other prejudices - such as "all muslims are terrorists" or "Jews are money-grabbing misers".

      It's well known. You are either massively ignorant or lying. And no, it's not the same.

      Thinking realistically about states that have no concept of law superior to the most powerful man is nothing like prejudice against people groups.

      Probably it's pointless to say that here, since the filter that determines whether I am heard is evidently comprised mostly of people who have no concept of truth superior to the most powerful opinion.

      And, you might be right- if you suck up enough and hand them your country, maybe the red guards won't shoot you first.

    4. Re:Whoa, steady now by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "This is an odd comment to be making here. 10 seconds on Google looking through any real IT informational site (say, like /.) or DoD site will give you plenty of examples of China using malicious network activities to their political, and military use."

      The point is that this is not the point. The point is that 10 seconds on Google looking through any real IT informational site (say, like /.) will show you that most other countries, for instance, USA, can be accused of just the same on a sounded ground (no: the DoD won't tell you that) so there shouldn't be an above average precaution on the Chinese government trying to spy on you versus, say, USA, EU or Russia to name a few.

  104. You notice he's changed it AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be "The GIMP doesn't have CMYK support".

    Now you'll notice it has to be "proper" CMYK support.

    The point is not that it doesn't have the features, it's that they GP doesn't WANT GIMP. And doesn't want anyone using GIMP (or at least to be able to look down on them). And definitely doesn't want people asking him if he USES "proper" CMYK support...

    1. Re:You notice he's changed it AGAIN by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      You know, the name wouldn't really be an issue if it hadn't been for the movie Pulp Fiction. But since I have seen that movie more than once, every time one of us OSS guys says something to the effect of 'bring out The GIMP' - a little part of me dies inside.

      The funny thing is - in the past two weeks I have fired up GIMP about a dozen times, and haven't used anything else for photo-editing (mostly resizing pictures from 5 megapixel down to something more manageable.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  105. If you never see a rooted pirate install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it matter that one exists?

    Nobody ever saw evidence for a black hole. And now that we have, it STILL doesn't mean we're going to get sucked into one.

  106. You have an even biger problem by originalhack · · Score: 1

    The same business ethics that make it "normal" to pirate software make it normal for employees to change jobs and take your designs and business information with them.

    It's a whole different ball game there.

  107. Copyright infringement not criminal? by SirGarlon · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not a good analogy as homicide is a criminal offense and software piracy a civil offense.

    You must not have watched a DVD lately: "Criminal copyright infringement is investigated by the FBI and carries penalties of [insert long prison sentence] or [insert whopping monetary fine], or both." There's also the international warning that Interpol will hunt you down if you live overseas.

    I'd agree with you that copyright infringement should be a civil matter, but it's also a criminal offense in most countries, thanks to the lobbying efforts of the MPAA, RIAA, and related racketeer^H^H^H^H^H^H industry groups.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Copyright infringement not criminal? by bestalexguy · · Score: 1

      You must not have watched a DVD lately

      Sure he did, but the uploader was kind enough to strip off that part, for ease of mind of the customer.

  108. Culture issue by raduf · · Score: 1

    You are right in that it's a culture issue, but believe you are wrong in your approach.

    I realize from your point of view what they do is illegal, and immoral. What you fail to understand is that in their environment it is neither. China as a country profits massively from lack of licenses, so any laws enforcing them are most likely only for show. As for the moral aspect: they view it exactly as you view listening to an unlicensed mp3. In theory is vaguely wrong, but in practice walking on the grass is more serious.

    Now, think a bit about the message you're sending. First, you don't give a damn about their culture. It's your company, your rules, your values, period.
    Second, you'll be seen as a weak manager. I'm sure there are dozens of other problems more serious then this (for them) and if you insist on dealing with a (from their point of view) useless issue first, that's not smart prioritizing.

    Still, you may know all this and still want to make a difference, because you consider using unlicensed software is wrong. Ok, go for it. But think twice about how you do it and the side-effects.

  109. Some people are better than almost everyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you wish a few people like the poster worked for, I don't know, the banks and mortgage companies?

    Or maybe Halliburton and other War profiteers?

    Or maybe that con artist in NY who ran the (latest) Ponzi scheme. Actually was someone who reported him for irregularities and apparently was left fearing for his life. (recent news reports.)

    Some people are better than just about everyone else. Too bad there aren't more of them in business and government.

  110. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by evanism · · Score: 1

    why don't we keep and track IP's like on Wikipedia and catch these pro-spoof people out with a mass IP reverse rally?

    I agree with you, there are far too many posts from the big companies stohere obviously trying to twist their companies agenda.

    Log all text skims, IPs of spiders and reverse back to posters.

    Just a thought.

    --
    Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  111. Nothing to do with China, moare about the size of by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    The size of the company dictates if it will raise a flag with M$. Everywhere i have went , all admins have said as a rule is dont break the 10pc policy. 10 pcs, does not raise the flag....and trust me, they have built in worms or trojans collecting all the info and sending it back to M$ hq, they know who uses all the pirated stuff. Why would Office be connectin to some server somewhere when I open powerpoint...because part of the office engine, sends info back home. This info includes software version and lets m$ know what is running on a network. If they see a network contains 100 pcs
    with about 5-10 diff. sofwtares including the OS, then they come knocking, if they see its a small company of 2-4 people, and they use a few lowly apps...they dont bother...the trip costs more then they could recuperate.

    Its all about the money....I know someone who has some graphic designers...they are trying to torrent a version of CS4 to use, and I told them, ok, but you might be taking a chance, he said
    he didn't care....as the penalty would be to buy a legal copy at that point. Maybe pay residuals, but for him, this would only happen if he got caught.

  112. Technology & humint fixes by klubar · · Score: 1

    There are some technology fixes that might help in the situation. First create an approved ghost image for the machines. Have the local staff re-image their machines off the ghost copy (at least you know what you're starting with).

    You should install/use active directory with very tight group policies control--the local users should have almost no rights to change anything on the machine. As suggested, the ability for you to remote into the machine (RDC) will allow you to look around and see what's going on. Depending on your bandwidth, you might push all the connection over the VPN to your local office, this way you can aggressive block access to non-approved sites via your firewall. You should also make sure all the mail runs through your corporate server -- with tight antivirus measures installed.

    A citrix or other thin client might solve the problem--no software is installed locally.

    The danger with all of these solutions, is that the local office can just go out and buy a PC and whatever software they want without letting you know. (Although the VPN solution and MAC filtering would somewhat prevent this.)

    If you always wanted to visit China, this might be a good excuse for an on-site visit to discuss the issues and install some of the fixes. A personal relationship with the Chinese office might make for a better situation--you could understand their needs (perhaps the company is being too tight with approved software) and they could understand the company's needs to abide by US laws on software ownership.
     

  113. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I work in a U.S. company. The U.S. office pirates IDE's, Office, Photoshop, Oracle (seriously), and plenty of other stuff. I'm surprised you are so worried. I don't think anyone cares about such things at all in China.

  114. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by HikingStick · · Score: 3, Informative

    As another IT manager, I know it's my can in a sling if the license status of the software is questioned and found to be illegal or unauthorized under my watch. It's not only my reputation on the line, but my company's reputation. When I took a stand on a recent plan proposed by one of our consultants, I knew that I was putting my neck out, but I was not going to let my name be listed as a supporter and implementor of a solution that would clearly violate our contract with a service provider. [The consultant wanted us to purchase a limited number of licenses for an online SaaS solution and then share the logon information with everyone in the company when the contract states in plain English that user accounts are intened for individual users and may not be shared.]

    I know many of you may shudder at the thought that a company continues to use M$ products, but that decision was already made in this case. Being an American company, comliance with licensing terms is something to which the company may well be held accountable. I think the best advice I've seen here is for this manager to document his concerns, communicate them up and down the tree, and then decide if he is comfortable working in the environment if management continues to overlook the issue.

    In my situation, I expressed my concerns about the company's reputation and legal liability issues to my upline, and I offered to walk (while making it clear that staying was my preference) if my stance was incompatible with the company's views on licensing and contract law. Two weeks later, we purchased the additional licenses, and I still have a job.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  115. If it's theft of labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then, since the COPY was created by the pirate, BSA thefts of this work must be considered theft too.

    Of the pirates work.

  116. You have a bigger problem than the piracy... by aqmxv · · Score: 1

    Machines with pirated software usually have malware as well, which means you now have a corporate data security problem. We've found with our Shanghai branch that the only solution has been to make sure nobody on site has admin rights. If they want software, we install it for them. Blast your standard OS and application build onto them and then lock the machines down.

  117. Use Mom's Argument by airship · · Score: 1

    Use my Mom's argument:

    "If all the other shops in China jumped off a bridge, would you?"

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:Use Mom's Argument by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      But Mom! I was pushed! *honest*

  118. What Can You Do? by qazwart · · Score: 1

    You can explain to your Beijing IT officials that their use of pirated software is putting the company into legal jeopardy. Even though this is all taking place in China, the company could be sued in the U.S. by another U.S. company, and the court case will be heard in the U.S. If that happened, the U.S. company could be fined millions of dollars.

    Let them know that the company will pay for the licenses for the software they need. Help them find alternatives for the software if you aren't going to license it. Let them know that corporate policy is to only use software where you have a valid license for it.

    China is sort of a special case. For the longest time, there was no concept of business enterprise or ownership. The rules for private businesses are still unclear. Courts and police do not understand these issues, and are still under the influence of the Communist Party which acts more like the Mafia rather than the Protector of the Proletariate Revolution. Many business rules and laws simply aren't followed if someone involved has connections to the Party.

    However, let them know that they must follow American law and their failure to do so will affect their American counterparts. Let them know you will be happy to help, and that no one is going to get in trouble while you are working on getting this licensing issue resolved.

    If they still prove uncooperative, you've pretty much done all you can. Now it is officially time to cover your ass. Document everything you are doing, and pass this on to your Corporate Compliance Office. If some rather smelly organic matter comes in contact with some nearby rotating blades, you've documented that you took all the action you could and had alerted everyone who should be alerted. With luck, the Finger 'o Blame will not fall on you.

  119. Fire them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I had this problem with our Beijing office. The top brass had the same attitude, "we're getting the job done so what".

    There are over 1 billion people in China, I could and did hire a replacement in less than a months time.

    You do get what you pay for though...a good salary for a skilled worker in Beijing is $10,000-$12,000/year.

  120. In China, they also ignore GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is also routine in China, to take GPL code, strip out the comments and licenses and use the code as their own.

    There is just a different view of copyright in China. As copyright is an abstract creation in capitalism, is this a surprise?

    Of course in the US, we have the opposite problem. Congress is going to keep extending copyright to 500 years. Most will just follow along.

  121. Forget about it, Jake. by FatalTourist · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's China (town).

    --


    Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  122. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I was in Tasmania for the first 2 weeks of December, and yes, there was occasional snowfall on Mt. Wellington.

    The mainland, however, sees almost none: our chilliest city, Melbourne, has had rail lines buckling in the heat in the last week. Here in Perth, it's business as usual - it's always hot at this time of year...

  123. Piracy? What's that? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Move to free and open source alternatives. Problem solved. After all they are just 5 employees with a bunch of servers and workstations, right? It shouldn't be a Shakespearean dilema...

  124. You've been to Asia, right? by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Walk into a mall and there are no "legit" software stores. You still buy your software, there are stands and small storefronts all over the place filled with shiny boxes and jewel cases.

    Short term solution is just buy legit copies of what they have installed and send it to them, so at least they have the licenses and CDkeys available, might help you get some leniency if the BSA or someone decides to come down on you. And then work to clean up the mess and get them aligned with IT / accounting standards.

    As far as the cultural aspects, they will never understand... it is much more convenient to install and run things through the "pirate" distribution channels, which have usually cleaned out the annoyances of product activation and click-through EULAs and all that other crap that US software companies subject us to. Also they wouldn't stand for software with half of the additional-cost features locked out, even if they are features they'd never use.

    On the other hand, this mentality makes them particularly amenable to adapting open source software, since they tend to be technically proficient enough to learn new ways of doing things, and really appreciate and expect not to have to deal with licensing hurdles and DRM. All you have really need to do is convince them that the open source software is technologically superior, which in most cases isn't too terribly difficult.

    1. Re:You've been to Asia, right? by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

      This guy is right. Piracy is embedded in the Chinese culture. I dated a Chinese girl and her entire extended family (a lot of people) felt it was perfectly normal to do shit like pirate software - and eat endangered species (I'm not kidding). I'd be surprised if there was even one legitimate copy of software in that entire country, frankly.

    2. Re:You've been to Asia, right? by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, they don't really consider it "piracy"... they usually bought it from a store off a shelf. They do realize that it's quite a bit cheaper (1/5 to just over the price of blank media) than what other countries might be paying for it.

      Places to buy "official" software practically have no presence or visibility in any marketplace. And if they did have a store, the locals would just laugh at how ridiculous the pricing was.

      Incidentally, people are much more sensitive to "market" prices. For example, when Nintendo releases a game, it doesn't sell for a fixed price, but rather by some kind of composite of materials complexity (e.g. 1MB vs. 4MB ROMS in old Famicom carts, which was actually listed as a "feature" on the box!) and how popular the game is on the charts, and of course traditional supply/demand of commodities. Only in the U.S. have I seen so much corporate and marketing-based price fixing, where a lame game based on a movie debuts at $40, and then maybe goes in the bargain bin for $20 some years later. The concept that some product (especially "dated" things like books and software) could have a fixed price is still somewhat alien to the East.

  125. Complain to management by alexborges · · Score: 1

    And do a budget for "legalizing".... you will see how the general manager thinks about "his" software.

    --
    NO SIG
  126. Reward Money by highfidelitychris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Turn them in for a reward. It's win-win.

  127. Buy legit copies. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Send it to them.
    Rat out your competitors.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  128. The price of meat by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Indeed,

    According to the index the price of a big mac in the US: 3.57$
    The price of a big mac in china: 1.83$

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  129. Welcome to slashdot by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Where it's OK to pirate music. But it's not good to pirate software.
    And it's even worse if the piracy is being done in Asia.

  130. 5,271,009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone does it eh?
    I would quote Alfred Bester:
    "In the 14th century, _everyone_ had lice."

  131. Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    To paraphrase a common meme (although this one actually makes sense):

    1) Beijing branch pirates software
    2) Report violation to company, which does nothing
    3) Report violation to spa.org
    4) Collect up to $1 million reward
    5) Profit!

  132. Funny... by hullabalucination · · Score: 1

    ..but I run an advertising agency that uses "free replacements" (on Linux) and am today wrapping up my fourth high-quality print project of the young year and a Website upgrade. Just for your edification, GIMP's had a very good CMYK export plugin for several years now, and I'll put my print portfolio up against anyone's.

  133. I think the problem is... by ParanoiaBOTS · · Score: 1

    I think part of the problem is the portability of software. I have pirated copies of things because I either lost the original media, damaged it beyond repair (yes, that IS my fault), or lost the Manual that the CD key is printed on. So what happens then? Well you are basically screwed, ESPECIALLY if you lost your key. I personally find it ridiculous that I have to keep track of that in the first place.

  134. Close them down by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Shut the Beijing office down in it's entirety. Tell them the company doesn't want to be associated in any way with the piracy of software.

    Tell them they have three days to acquire legal copies, or you fire them and find people that play by the rules.

    'Everyone does it' isn't an excuse. You know the old "If Everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you?' adage. Use it against them.

    I really don't know why you're asking Slashdot about remedies to this. Seriously. Anyone with half a brain would know either to fire them or force them to get legal, or have them sued/arrested (whichever China prefers.) There's really no other way to handle this.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Close them down by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      "Whichever China prefers?" While I haven't lived in China, I did live in a country right next to China, and I know that what is preferred there is a disc full of pirated software for about a buck. Even for computers in government offices. I doubt things are much different in China.

      In that country, if someone had told me I had three days to find a legit copy of Windows and MS Office, I would have been pretty hard up. My only reliable source would have been to ping somebody I knew at a major foreign company and ask them to burn me a copy of their legit CDs (thus, of course, making it pirated, but as close to legit as I could get). A legit copy of Windows or MS Office wasn't something a person could just walk into a computer store and buy. If they sold software, it was pirated. That's just the way it was. Amusingly, it was really hard to find Linux or other Free software there, even though they could legally copy it. I only knew one or two shops that sold any Linux CDs.

      That was in 2002 and 2003; I doubt it's changed any, except Linux might be a little more common there now.

      It would be truly hard to fire the staff for using the only kind of software they can get. To make them legal would probably require sending it all to them from the US office.

      Not to mention that IT staff normally do not have the authority to fire anyone for policy violations and it may not even be legal to fire someone in China for using pirated software. Have them sued or arrested for it? In China? BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

      Wait, let me guess. You work for the BSA, don't you? :)

    2. Re:Close them down by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, I work for the party of common sense. Government itself has no common sense, but any business that wants to keep their asses safe would PAY and send off the actual software to China for them to use.

      I don't see how hard that is.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Close them down by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Could be a little harden than you think, at least for a company that might not be used to all the customs rigamarole. Like you, I think they should. I believe in using Free Software to the greatest extend possible, but if you're going to use a proprietary product, it should be properly licensed. I, myself, have very little proprietary software. Even on my wife's Mac I use Free software where I can, but if I do choose a proprietary application (most recently SuperDuper), I pay the license fee.

      However, if they find themselves unwilling or truly unable to do so because of pervasive local practices, there's likely to be little downside to it. The BSA has no teeth in China, AFAIK does not operate there, and I have never heard of anyone being sued, much less arrested, for using pirated software anywhere in China or SE Asia. That day will come, when China reaches sufficient prosperity, but for now, Microsoft is not only turning a blind eye to rampant and blatant software piracy in that part of the world (as do pretty much all the MSFT competitors), but they are tacitly encouraging it. Why? They'd rather have hundreds of millions of people pirate their software until they can or will pay for it, rather than have those people install Linux instead.

  135. Outsourcing is still a net win, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. You outsource software development to save money...
    2. They use pirated software knowing they'll pirate software they developed...
    3. Go to step 1.

    Wasn't there something like that with financial services industry?
    Something along: steal personal information in order to solicit more services to steal more personal information...

  136. Not your problem by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    This is a management issue. Explain to management the legal problems of running pirated software, the costs of getting right, and the potential for someone who was disgruntled to turn in the company for reward money. If they still decide not to act, then enjoy the reward money. Just document everything so it's clear you tried to get eh company right with their licenses.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  137. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Got ya. Sorry, I thought you were criticizing his objectives rather than his approach. You're right - he could certainly have handled it better. If he needed advice he could have privately asked other IT workers, or if he truly felt the need to post it here he could at least cut out some of the detail.

  138. Do it! by dwater · · Score: 1

    I don't think you're right for doing it, but I encourage you anyway.

    You see, if they are forced to pay the going rate for such s/w, then they will be more likely to choose s/w that costs less, or is free, and thereby you'll be helping them to free themselves of the Microsoft shackles.

    IMO, Microsoft software is only commonly used in China because it's free - eventually, when China becomes super-rich, Microsoft will be able to get China to enforce similar laws as in the US and so make substantial profit from their Microsoft addiction.

    I did have a friend once tell me that she recently asked for Linux when she bought a new computer, but they said it wouldn't work on the h/w she chose. Plausible, but I'm doubtful they were telling the truth.

    Anyway, in my experience, Microsoft s/w isn't often free in China. It usually costs around 10rmb (~USD1) - and that's for a whole load of Microsoft s/w, including XP and Office, and no problems with that (deliberately?) poor attempt at stopping them too (they have to try, I expect, else people could say they're doing it delibately).

    --
    Max.
  139. clueless by r00t · · Score: 1

    The "CMYK" you use on your computer isn't likely to be the same as your printer uses. This is 100% certain if you use more than one type of printer or ink, because CMYK isn't standardized.

    Even if you solve that, you still lose. Remember that your screen isn't CMYK. You thus can't know exactly what you'll be printing until you print it.

    You'd be better off in RGB. That way, at least you can see what the program is using internally and you can benefit from the sanity of a 3-axis color space.

    Editing in CMYK is for when you want to **feel** like a pro, even if it makes things hard. I guess that matters to some people!

    You know, I could add a "CMYK mode" to The Gimp that was totally fake. It says CMYK, with UI controls translated to CMYK, but really does RGB internally. Aspiring artists would love it as long as they didn't know the truth.

  140. piracy is the norm in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked at a college in Beijing for a while. All of the software was pirated, both on the college computers and on the students' personal computers. Nobody saw anything wrong with this. What amused me, was that system images were regularly ghosted onto a wide range of hardware, some of which wasn't correct for the ghosted image ... and the support staff had no idea why some computers were stable and others weren't!

    Microsoft's recent deals with the Chinese government have basically legitimized nation-wide piracy in that country. You can ask your Beijing office to comply, but it is highly unlikely that they will listen to you.

  141. Re:What is with all the posts advocating open sour by r00t · · Score: 1

    Failure to handle 16+ bits is actually a problem.

    The CMYK nonsense is just people trying to follow the crowd and be cool.

    Poor gamma handling is also a problem, but AFAIK everything (except panotools?) gets this wrong.

  142. a real problem, but not how it works by r00t · · Score: 1

    The humans at your Beijing office will be patriotic or will have friends who are. You may innocently expect your foreign office to be working just for you, but they see you as the foolish foreigners and definitely not in the "one of us" category.

    Never mind the software. You have a huge security hole. Basically, you need to treat this office as a spy ring. Don't even consider putting them on the main corporate network.

    You're up against intense family and country loyalty. Ignore this, and you will soon find your technology in use at some Chinese firm.

  143. It SHOULD be a concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that it isn't just commonplace in Asian countries. It is common practice everywhere, regardless of nationality.

    To an IT Professional though, that doesn't make it right. Part of a the Corporate IT Job is keeping Documentation and ensuring Licensing Compliance. If you don't, then not only is your company put into jeopardy, but you are putting your job and career in jeopardy because you will be the scape-goat that will be canned when the BSA comes knocking.

    (And almost all BSA investigations come from disgruntled employees...fyi)

    You can't always force or restrict your users (especially those in a foreign office or upper management) into compliance. What I have routinely done, when my superiors *INSIST* on using Software that is not legally licensed, is let them...but whenever they have a problem with their computer, I don't troubleshoot, but restore a clean image sans their pirated Software. After the third time of having to reinstall their pirated Software themselves, they'll generally give up and budget for a licensed copy so that it will be included in their restore image.

    The issue of Pirated vs. Licensed Software is a moral one for each individual person to decide for themselves and doesn't enter the equation at all of Corporate Policy. When you work for a Corporation, you do things in the better interests of the Corporation, despite what your personal views on whether the use of Pirated Software is justified or not. In the Corporate World, IT has to tow the legal line on this. It's not a moral issue, but a legal one, simple as that.

  144. "going back to basics and saving their money" by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Bollocks!

    They're forced into this because nobody wants to keep giving them more credit.

    Unfortunately you're correct that the rest of the world has been ready to work in the kitchens and make money off the people throwing their credit cards around.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  145. And you're a typical Aussie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Trying to misrepresent Australia.

    Your country is as-described by the messenger you're shooting at.

    It's mostly desert, with areas of tropical coastline to the north.

    Snow in Australia? Sure, occasionally. But there's a reason Australia's "ski industry" is considered a joke by almost everybody else.

    Yes, I know, that cuts you to the bone, since you're determined to convince everybody that "Australia leads the world, etc..."

    But as a non-American who has lived in and travelled throughtout Australia, I can say with authority that the OP is correct.

  146. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by Taelron · · Score: 1

    While many big companys may employ people to go through these threads, I dont work for any big company... I've been an independent since I got in the field in '99... Take your flame bait else where, thanks.

  147. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by Taelron · · Score: 1
    No raids in China? Really... Really?

    Well since you are to lazy or misinformed to do your own research: Raids in Southern China Target $2 Billion Global Software - July 24, 2007 - www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=203561

    No, I dont work for any large company, never have. But thanks for hoping the best for my financial future.

    Yes I know many of the computers in China are older and slower and many running out dated software such as VCC and FoxPro, both which Microsoft chopped. Having an old license isnt the same as pirated software.

    I'm not offering up my personal views here, but the same attention to detail I bring to each of my clients. As a consultant, if I let slip a piece of pirated software into a clients network and then they get busted, they can in turn come after me for their losses. In the business world its all about C.Y.A.

    Another problem with using older software for your coders is simply that, you are using old codes... Everyone that codes knows that hooks and pointers change from .dll version to .dll version. Something that worked with Winsock32.dll 5.0.234 might not work with 6.0.12... And if you force them to downgrade that one file for your program to work, you may break five other programs.

    We all know the software business does not have the same quality control as other businesses.

  148. what is their incentive? by dabei · · Score: 1

    Are they given enough budget to purchase legal software? If yes, then the budget may have ended up in someone's pocket. If not, does the head office suggest open source solutions like OpenOffice? Either way, they have to stop such practice. However, if this "branch office" is really an outsourcing company that deals with your company on a contract basis, then it doesn't really matter how they do their work.

  149. Re:Don't Stick Your Neck Out, But CYA & Pass t by tftp · · Score: 1

    For example, in Russia, it is NOT illegal to pirate software unless it is in the Russian language. They have not signed the Berne Convention [...]

    Russia had joined the Berne Convention in 1995, as Google gladly reports in the first result and Wikipedia confirms. You also probably haven't heard about a number of people put on trial for pirating foreign software.

  150. Blame Microsoft by Jettra · · Score: 1

    I wish Microsoft would get their act together and stop producing software which is so easy to pirate.

    Then we could stop making criminals of all these poor people just trying to get the most readily available and easily copied office tools around.

    But it is not really in Microsoft's best interest to do this. now is it!

  151. Software and keygen supplied by china office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a very rather large international company. On more than one occasion we've been sent software including a crack.txt file and even a keygen and instructed by our Chinese colleagues to just use that... Not bloody likely!

  152. Just buy the licenses by spasm · · Score: 1

    If it's five employees, buy them the damn licenses and tell them that you need to do so because of the legal environment in the US. Oh, and here's the iso's and keys if they want to make use of them now that you actually have them.

  153. caring less by FreakWent · · Score: 1

    "could care less" means that you care a lot and you have room to care less strongly if you wanted to.

    You dumb yanks need to say "I Couldn't care less", as in "I care so little it would be impossible for me to reduce my care factor any further".

  154. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by beav007 · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, here in Esperance, we are having hot spells interspersed with stupid amounts of rain, making the farmers who are still trying to harvest increasingly annoyed...

  155. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by FreakWent · · Score: 1

    it snowed in Canberra in December one year.

  156. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by danomac · · Score: 1

    ( actually it is amazing how these kids get so much done working little on 17 inch monitors )

    17" monitor is little? I almost fell off my chair. I used a 14" CRT for years. The laptop I had to use back then had a monochrome screen that was *maybe* 7".

  157. Re:Ya know what else you should ask for? by beav007 · · Score: 1

    Hell froze over?

  158. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    No raids in China? Really... Really?

    I heard a case in China: someone claimed to be a lawyer calls a software company accusing them using illegal copy of JBuilder (still remember that) even though the company was using Eclipse. (One must figure out from the company website that the software is written in Javan and therefore must be using JBuilder -- the IDE of choice for many CChinese Java programmers, because it can bought from pirate market.)

    In China, everything can be faked; Even lawyers and policemen may be faked. And if someone telling you he knows some high official to solve your problem, watching out; that guy likely knows nobody.

  159. Re:Seen it time and time again with Asian offices. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an I.T. consultant in Silicon Valley and.... ...therefore know nothing about the rest of the world and will shut up before I make a fool of myself....

    Oh, too late!

  160. Introduce them to open source by b.honeydew · · Score: 1

    It's disheartening when a country pirates software en masse when there is a huge catalogue of OSS they could take advantage of. Introduce them to [insert favourite distro here] and Gimp and Open-Office.

    --
    Muppet Show > Monty Python
  161. Now You Know .. by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

    ... why it's so 'cheap' to offshore.

  162. my APAC office experinces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a licensing administrator and Sysadmin for a company that has offices in several south pacific countries, i agree there is a different world of responsibilities. (they are end users, not admins)
      Our aussie offices requested to have youtube unblocked as they like to watch stuff while they work, we said no, when the blocking failed they did it until the branch manager received a 7K(1.6TB) internet bill for bandwidth overage.

      When i started people in our Mainland SE Asia offices were plugging in USB key's that they bought from a guy down the road for file transferring, and they were just not aware of the risks etc.. we informed them about the risk their actions pose to our clients and the company (their job) and it stopped about 90% of it.. that last 10% was disabling the usb ports on their computers, not 100% fool proof but better than nothing..(MS shop)

      In regards to installing software, we just took their rights away, because the situation was rampant.. 3-4 messaging clients, multiple tool bars in browsers and scary surfing habits..

    they resisited our move to lock down their workstations and the manger took offense and deleted all the files(they had access to) from their server and walked out... we replaced her with a manager from HK who supported our move(politically or ideologically not i don't know)

    But do your CYA / due diligence and inform the directer, CIO etc of your company what you have discovered, and that you tried to deal with the office, as they ignored your request you have "escalated" the issue up the payscale..
    Sometimes you need to speak softly and carry a big stick, othertimes you just need to know someone with a big stick

  163. Re:He's sorta right by lpq · · Score: 1


    Say everyone has one of those Star Trek replicators.
    Someone goes to the grocery store, and buys an item.
    Said someone then puts that in his replicator and then uploads the "recipe" for that item.
    Everyone else who wants to, downloads the recipe and creates a copy of that item (from their own raw materials).
    I do not see how this is clearly unethical or wrong.

    On one level I agree with you. But something is gnawing at me. The knowledge of how to convert something from raw ingredients into the finished good isn't in any computer. For every recipe that produces something tasting good, there are thousands of recipes to produce junk. The 1 good recipe or song isn't worth the price of 1 success -- it's worth:
      the price of (price of a success) * (cost of all successes)/(cost of all failures**).

    Now cost of all failures also includes all the time wasted by unsuccessful artists -- not just the failures produced by the successful artist.

    So the price to produce 1 'great recipe' might include 10's of thousands of dollars of "overhead". That artist will never be able to sell their one song for ... say $200,000. But they might get 50 cents from 400,000 people. That's the essence of why he needs to sell 400,000 copies. Then you add in distribution, advertising...all the overhead and it gets blown into the stratosphere -- and certainly, there is more than a little profit taking by the large corporations who buy the artists (but that's a different problem related to greed and corporate excess). Despite the overhead issue -- it doesn't negate the basic model -- the artist needs to sell 400,000 copies of their recipe in order to 'break even' -- else, it isn't worth them to be a cook, sweating away over bad recipes. They might as well go produce wooden widgets that can't be easily reproduced because they can't be digitally copied.

    Now ideally, after the artist sells their 400,000 copies, the recipe goes into the public domain -- and THEN everyone can put it in their replicators and use it to their hearts' content -- the entire society is enriched. The part of "works moving into the public domain" is currently *broken*. This leads to some class of people saying "the heck with this system. It's never benefiting the common good. Let's ignore the bogus fat-cat enrichment system and benefit ourselves right now".

    Massive piracy, is the other side of the Mickey-Mouse Copyright Perpetual Extension system. If copyright and patent terms were considered 'reasonable' by the average person, then the average person wouldn't be so tempted by piracy.

    The downside of piracy is that people who produce intangible works...the poets, artists, and programmers of the world -- will be pauper's in their own time and only a few master's will find their work valued -- probably after they are dead. As our general 'minimum wage' increases, artists and such, in the society will find themselves unable to exist .... or make subsistence at the minimum wage. So...they will tend toward extinction. The question becomes -- do we value the output of those paid for 'intellectual' or 'creative' output? That's where the system comes into play. The problem is that the compensation to the 'authors' or artists is now dwarfed by the fat-cats distributing profits to stockholders and the CEO-types...

    That's going to take some major revising of our capitalist system that I doubt even Obama can perform.

  164. Re:What is with all the posts advocating open sour by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Failure to handle 16+ bits is actually a problem

    Not for web pages, anything that is going to be shown only on a monitor or printed on the not paticularly good colour printers in an office. We don't all work in publishing.

    Real graphics designers should feel free to correct me on those points.

  165. Report the authorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you lose your job. Good luck finding the next job!

  166. Simpsons Quote!!! by Jaqenn · · Score: 1

    "Oh, yeah, what are you gonna do? Release the dogs? Or the bees? Or the dogs with bees in their mouth and when they bark, they shoot bees at you?" --Homer Simpson

    --
    You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
  167. Expensive by mahadiga · · Score: 1


    If the original copy is expensive everybody will prefer to buy the pirated copy.

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  168. Re:What is with all the posts advocating open sour by r00t · · Score: 1

    It matters for web pages.

    If you have 256 levels (16 million colors), then brighten the image, you end up with less than 256 levels. This is undesirable.

    If you work with the 65536 levels that many digital cameras provide and do likewise, you get far more than 256 levels. (less than 65536 of course) When you then save your image for a web page, you get the full 256 levels.