Slashdot Mirror


AT&T's Bad Math Strikes MythBusters' Savage

etherlad writes "MythBusters' Adam Savage got a bill charging him $11,000 for 'a few hours' of Web surfing while in Canada, using his AT&T USB Mercury modem. AT&T gave him a quote on the data rate: '.015 cents, or a penny and a half, per kb.' Looks like AT&T didn't learn from Verizon's inability to do math. AT&T is also claiming Savage downloaded over 9 GB, which he calls 'frakking impossible.' Savage's huge following on twitter got him a speedy response by AT&T."

305 comments

  1. Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bust the all the myths that the companies quote about why they need to charge what they do, reliability, and especially that there is competition in the marketplace?

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by randomnote1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol...I don't think so. I think that everybody knows that myth is BUSTED!

    2. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A proper myth should have at least some people believing it's true, although the Mythbusters have been kinda loose with that rule.

    3. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by thsths · · Score: 1

      I have seen this before - what is it about saying 0.02 cent when you mean 2 cent or 0.02 dollar? Does not make the least bit of sense to me - although I can at least see why you would do it there (0 dollor and 2 cent...). But with fractional cent that does not explain it, so why do people do it?

    4. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      I honestly think this would be a better topic for Penn&Teller Bullshit to cover, particularly text messaging charges.

      I did however dig out my cellphone bill from about 15 years ago. Somehow I don't remember things being as bad as they were because my bills in 1994 dwarfed my bill today.

    5. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have seen this before - what is it about saying 0.02 cent when you mean 2 cent or 0.02 dollar?

      One time in science class, grade 10, we had to do something where we were given some basic info about an object made out of aluminum and the market cost of aluminum. We had to figure out the raw-material cost of the object, assuming no loss during construction. So we had to use our lessons on density and whatnot to figure out the exact mass of the object and then simply multiply by price.

      Problem is, most of us screwed up the ".02 cents per gram" (or whatever) part and did .02 dollars, so we were off by a factor of 100.

      Class response was... informative. The few observant students who got it looked smug. Some smacked their heads at missing that. A few were severely pissed that they got the question wrong over the one part of the question that had nothing to do with science. One got that part right but botched the density part of the problem. The underachievers were either confused by the whole thing or glad they didn't even try.

      And one guy... one guy spent ten minutes arguing with the teacher that .02 dollars and .02 cents were the same thing. Half a blackboard of diagrams later and she gave up trying to explain it.

      Now I know where that guy works.

    6. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Now if we could get some diagrams explaining who the GP was responding to because clicking "parent" goes to my post and I don't mention that anywhere. Maybe he meant the cellphone co's price listings?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    7. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by Brett+Johnson · · Score: 1

      How can it take 1/2 a blackboard, when about 3 lines of algebra yield either 1 dollar = 1 cent, or .02 dollar = 2 dollar.

    8. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      How can it take 1/2 a blackboard, when about 3 lines of algebra yield either 1 dollar = 1 cent, or .02 dollar = 2 dollar.

      He wasn't very good at algebra, either.

    9. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Hundreds of thousands of people are trained to act just like that one guy, and they all work as CSRs and supervisors at various call centers.

  2. He should'a known... by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ".015 cents, or a penny and a half"

    Let me guess... whichever is larger?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does that mean they "only" over-charged by 100X, so the bill should be $110 for a few hours? That's still outrageous, no?

    2. Re:He should'a known... by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, you divide the larger by the smaller.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:He should'a known... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was roaming outside of the country, so it's not that bad, considering how much voice minutes are, too.

    4. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Welcome to Canada, he almost got a better rate then we do here Rogers Wireless which is the only provider of GSM unless he was with Bell or Telus for CDMA / TDMA. In Canada you have to deal with one of the three (there is Fido but they are really Rogers) for 1GB(yes o.n.e) it is $30/month with a 3 cent overage calculated per KB, this is from the Rogers and Telus is actually 5 cents per MB. If you can figure out what Bell is actually offering your likely a natural genius but all the plans start at $45.

      You can tell I'm slightly bitter but paying this kinda dough just to have 'the right' to do what I want and have the same kind of access other places in the world have the opportunity to use it kind of makes me feel silly being Canadian.

    5. Re:He should'a known... by similar_name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ".015 cents, or a penny and a half"
      Let me guess... whichever is larger?

      I can't believe no on Slashdot has pointed out that .015 cents != a penny and a half
      .015 dollars = a penny and a half.

    6. Re:He should'a known... by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. Shit. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    7. Re:He should'a known... by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its ok, you can take your agression out on the printer.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    8. Re:He should'a known... by collinstocks · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. You divide the larger by the difference.

    9. Re:He should'a known... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I knew that... geez. Do I really have to explain the joke? Whenever there's two options, it's always whichever one is better for them... sort of like the 20,000 mile / 10 year warranty: whichever comes sooner.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:He should'a known... by similar_name · · Score: 0

      I knew that... geez. Do I really have to explain the joke?

      No you don't have to explain the joke, I should have replied to the summary as that's where the mistake originated.

    11. Re:He should'a known... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      ...and packet sizes are rounded up to the next higher K...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    12. Re:He should'a known... by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      that's the way it's written in the FTA. I'm guessing the Rep said it as it's written.. incorrectly once and correctly the second time, not realizing they were in fact different amounts

    13. Re:He should'a known... by shma · · Score: 1

      I can't believe no on Slashdot has pointed out that .015 cents != a penny and a half .015 dollars = a penny and a half.

      No one pointed out the mistake because a) it is mentioned in the summary ("Looks like AT&T didn't learn from Verizon's inability to do math") and b) everyone here knows how to do elementary school arithmetic, so no one felt the need to point out the obvious.

      --
      I came here for a good argument
    14. Re:He should'a known... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you used to work for Verizon, and now work for AT&T?

      I wonder what would happen if you started working for the Tax dept, then again maybe AIG or Citibank needs your skills more :).

      --
    15. Re:He should'a known... by dotgain · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the fuck does that mean?

    16. Re:He should'a known... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      That's sort of implicit in the summary. "Bad math" is kind of a clue that AT&T made a number error, and there's a link to Verizon making the identical mistake (a link which explains the error). I mean, thanks for spelling it out and all, but it's not like no one noticed it.

    17. Re:He should'a known... by corsec67 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It means you need to watch more movies

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    18. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... he was quoting the movie.

      Granted, it wasn't a perfect setup, but a printer was mentioned at least.

    19. Re:He should'a known... by similar_name · · Score: 0

      so no one felt the need to point out the obvious

      What site am I on, I thought this was Slashdot. Though people are taking my comment very seriously, so I guess it is.

    20. Re:He should'a known... by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the pricing is only as ridiculous as the ridiculous pricing on another item?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    21. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the acknowledgment that one is larger than the other not imply that they are not equal?

    22. Re:He should'a known... by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no... You do it like this!

    23. Re:He should'a known... by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous, but customary. If I make an hour-long phone call from Canada, I expect to be dinged for something on the order of a hundred bucks for it. If I'm billed for more like TEN THOUSAND, that's a little different...

    24. Re:He should'a known... by mini+me · · Score: 1

      In Canada you have to deal with one of the three (there is Fido but they are really Rogers)

      Some of the independent telephone companies have branched out into the cell service business in the last couple of years.

    25. Re:He should'a known... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pointing out that frakking "mistake" is the frakking point of the frakking article. You are not a frakking genius.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    26. Re:He should'a known... by DesertJazz · · Score: 1

      The printer's great, but the Fax machine... now that's where it's at!

    27. Re:He should'a known... by RawsonDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't believe no on Slashdot has pointed out that .015 cents != a penny and a half

      That's because that is suppose to be the obvious part, but isn't to surprisingly few people. That's the whole point.

      The rate really is 1.5 cents per KB, but it is constantly quoted as .015 cents.. that is, the number is typed out in dollars (.015) but because everyone knows that a price in fractions of dollars is really talking about cents, that's the unit spoken by a lot of people when interpreting it. "Point zero one five cents." And they don't understand that they have changed the value.

      It's not a matter of a haywire billing system, it a matter of false advertising by those who misquote it and to those who (gasp) interpret things literally - the ones who don't are just suckers.

    28. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was serious. Painfully serious. And that means you actually did demonstrate how much of a fucking idiot you were on an internet nerd forum about computer stuff.

    29. Re:He should'a known... by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

          I was up in Canada for a coupe months, a while back (like, a few years ago). We learned quickly that the calls were expensive. Luckily, I got my first bill at home shortly after my arrival, so it was very obvious, and only several hundred dollars high. My work reimbursed my phone expense, and my cell calls suddenly became "state your emergency" and "I'll call you back from my land line", which was actually my Vonage phone plugged into a wireless bridge in the hotel. :) They still got me for international roaming, which was still a bastard.

          That's actually one of the nice things with the Vonage phone. If I'm out of town for more than a couple days, I bring a spare handset and the box, and plug it in when I settle in. I've gotten some strange looks wandering the halls of a hotel on my cordless phone, but the calls didn't cost me any extra. :)

          American cell phone providers are generally terrible. Our phones, for the most part, won't roam to Europe or Asia, but I've had people from Europe come here without any substantial problems. Ya, ya, I know the technical reasons. I don't like them, nor the contractual reasons. Cell phones are for portability, why can't I get on a plane in New York, and hop off in Hong Kong, and call home? For a 1 week job in Amsterdam, I picked up a cheap prepaid just so I had a number people could call.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    30. Re:He should'a known... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Roaving voice minutes being expensive does not make a few hours in another country's web surfing for $110 cheep, it makes both a rip off.

    31. Re:He should'a known... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      That's hilarious, what show is that?
      It looks ancient.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    32. Re:He should'a known... by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just wow - "Woosh" really doesn't seem to cut it in this circumstance.

    33. Re:He should'a known... by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      The problem is not maths, per se, but numbers and the ability to read them. There is not really much maths involved in being able to read a number. It's not like customer service people work out the charges themselves.

    34. Re:He should'a known... by hattig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why call centre scripts should never use symbols, like "$1.50", or in this case "$0.015". They should explicitly write out what the person will say, i.e., "one dollar fifty", or "one point five cents". This is because people are incredibly stupid/prone to fluffing things up under stress, especially in a dull repetitive job dealing with annoyed customers.

      Anyway, 9 GB in a few hours eh? For casual web browsing? To get to 9 GB would require watching TEN HOURS of TWO MBIT video streams. I suspect YouTube is 500kbps so that's FORTY HOURS of YouTube. To consistently get two mbit on a 3G modem would be a miracle.

    35. Re:He should'a known... by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1
      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    36. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @corsec67. FAIL

    37. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's apparently from one of the Ma and Pa Kettle films.

    38. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing out that frakking "mistake" is the frakking point of the frakking article

      Who reads the frakking article?

    39. Re:He should'a known... by Galois2 · · Score: 1

      The story makes it seem that the math is bad, but it's not. True, the rep apparently mistated 0.015 cents as 1.5 cents, but the $11K results from the LOWER 0.015 cents number: 9x10^6 KB * 8 bits/byte * 0.015 cents/kbit * $1/100 cents = $10,800.

    40. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FTA? Could you mutilate an acronym any worse?

    41. Re:He should'a known... by honkycat · · Score: 1

      It's not that hard to get a phone that will roam to Europe. After all, the reason the European phones work here is that T-Mobile (and at least one other, but T-Mobile is the one I use) use a compatible system. These phones are also far superior in terms of battery life, particularly in areas with weak signals. At least, they were the last time I shopped around. I've taken my phone to Europe and to Chile and had very good coverage.

      But I'm not going to argue that the providers don't suck...

    42. Re:He should'a known... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I'll point out that .015 dollars does not equal a penny and a half, since the US (and Canada) have no coin called a penny. That's England. Here we have cents.

      --
      This space available.
    43. Re:He should'a known... by xystren · · Score: 1

      But was it over a patch Tuesday where he had his Windows automatic updates turned on? that could easily reach 9gb. [/sarcasm]

      Cheers,
      Xyst

    44. Re:He should'a known... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Damn cool thx :)
      Never heard of this before

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    45. Re:He should'a known... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Our phones, for the most part, won't roam to Europe or Asia, but I've had people from Europe come here without any substantial problems.

      Those of us with AT&T or T-Mobile have no problems. People on CDMA carriers like Sprint or Verizon do.

      Verizon is starting the move to LTE in 2010, so the only major carrier left that won't be on GSM/UMTS will be Sprint.

      I have never owned a mobile phone that was not GSM (now GSM/UMTS). So I'm not really sure what you're complaining about. GSM has been pretty common in the US since at least 1997. You just have to pick the right carrier.

    46. Re:He should'a known... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The USA has no coin called a penny?

      I wonder what this copper thing with Lincoln's bust on it is, then.

      England calls it a Pence.

      *holds up thousands of foreign coins.*

      Even the Republic of the Bahamas calls their copper coin a penny.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    47. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England calls it a Pence.

      They still call it a penny. Pence is plural form.

    48. Re:He should'a known... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Informative

      The thing with lincoln on it is a one cent piece. There is no US coin called a penny.

      --
      This space available.
    49. Re:He should'a known... by Miseph · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Sprint's defense, they are already partially part GSM. Since they acquired Nextel in 200_ they've been operating the biggest iDEN network around (which is like being the smartest kid in special ed, but take what victories you can), and iDEN actually runs on a GSM backbone with extra spiffy bits to allow push-to-talk and the like. Hence, they are partially part GSM.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    50. Re:He should'a known... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The thing with lincoln on it is a one cent piece. There is no US coin called a penny.

      There is no US coin "officially" called a penny. But, for that matter, I don't believe we officially have "dimes" or "nickles", either.

      We also have no "grand", or "jefferson", or "benjamin." What's your point?

    51. Re:He should'a known... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Sometimes we don't have choices, and sometimes we go with the best deals at the time.

          When I went to Europe, I was using Nextel. Since it was a 1 week trip, it was silly to need to cover the expense of their world roaming phone, and even with that, if I remember right, you had to get their SIM, which would have been outrageously priced.

          I gave up my private cell a couple years ago, when my pay dropped dramatically (involuntarily changed jobs) and my expenses didn't. I stayed with whatever work gave me, and had Vonage forward to it.

          I had already been looking for what providers give the best deals on prepaid phones, with the idea of tethering one to a tablet in my car. All I really wanted to do was send GPS data back up to my own server, so I could do this with minimal bandwidth. I would have liked enough bandwidth to send video (1 frame every 4 seconds would be great). Prepaid didn't have much for that, that would be reasonable.

        When I was laid off about a month ago, I handed over my cell phone on the way out the door. I know I needed a cell to be able to answer potential job prospects while away from my desk. I picked the Boost Mobile phone. For $50, it gives me unlimited voice, data, and text. The data is ungodly slow, but since I'm using it as a phone, that doesn't matter. I tethered it to my laptop for giggles, and ya, it was about half the speed of a noisy dialup connection.

          My credit is already shot, and since I was freshly unemployed, going to any provider and saying "I'd like a plan, but I have no way to ensure future payments" was unreasonable. I've actually gone through the drill before helping other people. The answer is usually "Sure you can have a phone. We'll require a $400 deposit."

          AT&T's "GoPhone" prepaid is $3/day, so about $90/mo, which doesn't appear to include data.

          T-Mobile's prepaid is $1/day + $0.10/min between 7am and 7pm.

          My old average usage was about 3000 minutes. So if half of that was in the free period (7pm to 7am), I'd be looking at $180/mo.

          I would have preferred a GSM phone, but I can't reasonably think that it's the better choice. As it is, I'm using up the last of my savings, and will have to ask friends and family to chip in to pay the few bills I have left (like, the phone), until I find new work. Since they like to be able to get me any time, it's an expense they can help pay for.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    52. Re:He should'a known... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      We do have dimes. That's the official name. We don't have nickels, we have five cent pieces.

      My point was simply that if the grandparent was going to be pedantic and correct what he corrected, I could be pedantic and correct HIS inaccuracy.

      --
      This space available.
    53. Re:He should'a known... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      I assume you checked the exchange rates at the moment you posted that, to be assured that the exchange rate did not make a liar out of you?

    54. Re:He should'a known... by AG+the+other · · Score: 1

      You're just not an old enough fart.

      AG

      --
      Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
    55. Re:He should'a known... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      And I'm dutch and I doubt that this was shown on dutch tv :)
      (age 30 btw)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    56. Re:He should'a known... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Then I better correct your inaccuracy yet again, because we do have nickels, in fact it was called that by EVERYONE because of what it was made of at the time - nickel!

      Even Ghana called it a penny, and officially by putting it on the coin itself, and this happened before Ghana's 1957 independence from Great Britain.

      Get the Standard Catalog of World Coins and come back when you've read the entire thing.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    57. Re:He should'a known... by AG+the+other · · Score: 1

      I don't remember seeing any of those movies on TV since the 60's. I'm 54 BTW.

      AG

      --
      Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
    58. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its ok, you can take your agression out on the printer.

      I was the copier. (Plus you spelled aggression wrong) :)

    59. Re:He should'a known... by R4nneko · · Score: 1

      Can I say whomever decided to not put numerals for the values on US coins is almost as much of a git as the guy who decided that your 10c pieces should just say dime.

      I found it surprisingly unhelpful because coming from a country that doesn't nickname it's coins and being used to size order of value in the sub $1 coins, I had problems initially sorting out my change. I had difficulty remembering whether it was a dime or a nickel which was 5 or 10 cents and my initial hunch was of course dead wrong since the 5c coin is larger than the 10c coin which doesn't show a value.

      Made me pretty happy with my own Aussie coins which have large numbers prominently displayed on the tails side.

    60. Re:He should'a known... by hab136 · · Score: 1

      The thing with lincoln on it is a one cent piece. There is no US coin called a penny.

      That may not be it's official name, but both I and the US Mint call it a penny:

      http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/circulatingCoins/index.cfm?action=CircPenny

    61. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we do NOT have nickels. We have five cent pieces. The US has never had a coin called the nickel... and it has never had a coin made mostly of nickel. Nickel is a ferrous metal and will be attracted to magnets. No US coins have ever been, with the exception of wartime steel cents.

      Ghana, if they named their coin a penny, named it after the British Penny. The US since independence has has decimal coinage (whereas the British didn't) and has always had cent pieces. It has been nicknamed a penny only because it resembled a penny to formerly british early americans.

    62. Re:He should'a known... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I should add that Canadian five cent pieces HAVE been made mostly of nickel... and thus were attracted to magnets. Canadia has large nickel deposits.

      --
      This space available.
  3. Lucky for them by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure what a crowd of angry MythBusters fans would do, but I'm sure that it would involve large amounts of kinetic energy.

    1. Re:Lucky for them by rackserverdeals · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not the fans.

      You don't mess with people that blow stuff up for a living.

      Even if they're nerds.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    2. Re:Lucky for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? They're going to fling their remotes?

    3. Re:Lucky for them by subsonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      hey, i replied to his tweets in solidarity! What more is there? /this slashdot reply is for those who gave the last full measure of their internet devotion in settling a cell phone bill dispute. (pours out 40)

    4. Re:Lucky for them by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 1

      For the rest of us, there's class action...

    5. Re:Lucky for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    6. Re:Lucky for them by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah violent angry mobs. Is there anything they cant do.

      The cause of, and answer to all lifes problems.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    7. Re:Lucky for them by op8ed · · Score: 1

      Fires are ok, but there is nothing like a really BIG EXPLOSION!

    8. Re:Lucky for them by gottebag · · Score: 1

      I thought that was alcohol?

    9. Re:Lucky for them by Vanders · · Score: 1

      The alcohol is helpful in creating a violent angry mob.

    10. Re:Lucky for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if they're nerds.

    11. Re:Lucky for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Yet another comic artist who stole from Berkeley Breathed.

    12. Re:Lucky for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, did you just link Userfriendly? Your nerd credentials are revoked, that shit is just bad.

  4. no way in hell! by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Funny

    there is no way in hell AT&T would be getting that kind of money out of me! you hear that AT&T?!!

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:no way in hell! by Smooth+and+Shiny · · Score: 1

      Dear FudRucker:

      It has come to our attention that you used over 50GB of data while surfing the web on your new iPhone 3G S. At the current rate of , I am afraid that we need you to remit payment ASAP to avoid interruption in service. We accept cash, check, credit card, greenbacks, war bonds, children old enough to be sold into slavery and, of course, food stamps.

      Thank you for using AT&T.

  5. from the people who brought you this commercial... by starblazer · · Score: 5, Funny

    IDK MY BFF JILL DOZ MTH 4 ATT

  6. Celebrity status? by elashish14 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish I could have a mass following behind me that I could use to blackmail evil corporations.... Instead, here I am just clicking away at every Microsoft ad I see hoping that it'll eventually rack up some respectable cost to them.

    -bitterness, sad face-

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    1. Re:Celebrity status? by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, when I was young, man moons ago, we used to have these things called "consumer protection laws". You could walk over to your phone and call a government hotline for help. Of course, you'd get a massive shock when you picked up the phone because of the electrostatic action of your polyester leisure suit, so I'd have to conclude that on the whole things aren't any better or worse than they used to be.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Celebrity status? by Binestar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, he's got 55,000 and growing followers on twitter. In the last 7 hours he's sent out a dozen or so tweets. To 55,000 people. 25 cents (.25 dollars) per text == AT&T making a lot of money off Adam's outrage.

      He just got commision =)

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    3. Re:Celebrity status? by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most people don't actually get their entire Twitter feed send to their phone.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    4. Re:Celebrity status? by Toonol · · Score: 2, Funny

      And those that do, deserve whatever AT&T charges them.

    5. Re:Celebrity status? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >> I'm a 30 year old Nude Photographer, Comics/Gaming Geek, and Tech Check out my Photography - http://ian-x.com/

      Pardon the OT, but... don't people get upset when you strip down and start photographing things?

    6. Re:Celebrity status? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you'd get a massive shock when you picked up the phone because of the electrostatic action of your polyester leisure suit, so I'd have to conclude that on the whole things aren't any better or worse than they used to be.

      While I can't definitively say that fashion has improved much, I'm pretty sure it's not gotten worse that the "polyester leisure suit". The only shock you would receive now would be if you actually got to speak to a real person on the other end of the phone, because customer service was much better man [sic] moons ago than it is now.

    7. Re:Celebrity status? by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      He also happens to have a TV show.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    8. Re:Celebrity status? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Given that his cell phone was turned off by AT&T (as a result of his alleged overage charge), I have a hard time believing AT&T got any money from Mr. Savage's tweets.

      Besides, even if he had sent the tweets via cell phone, all 55,000 of his followers would have had to be 1) AT&T subscribers and 2) set up their Twitter accounts to receive Savage's updates via text messages and 3) paid for those text messages at the basic rate (not via some kind of unlimited usage plan). I don't know about you, but I find that to be a rather dubious scenario.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    9. Re:Celebrity status? by Tyrion+Moath · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's 20 cents a text anyway, and I'd bet most of them probably have unlimited texting anyway.

    10. Re:Celebrity status? by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh America!
      Being charged money to RECEIVE SMS and phone calls, absoloutely apalling, my condolences. :(

      - The rest of the world.

    11. Re:Celebrity status? by rawler · · Score: 1

      Actually, that gives me an idea. Couldn't anyone write a modification to adblock that does this automatically? Basically, you enter a whitelist of companies you want to punish, and whenever adblock sees what looks like one of their ads, it simulates a click in the background, that you're not forced to see?

      Encourage a few users to install, and it would start getting noticable. :) While I truly believe ads as such are good for the web as a whole, some ads and ad-driven sites (especially all things Flash) should be punished for ruining my user-experience with blinking crap getting all in the way all the time, even sometimes intentionally trying to trick the user into clicking the wrong links.

    12. Re:Celebrity status? by rdoger6424 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We're charged to receive calls because the phone system in America does not differentiate between cell phones and landlines. I myself find it ridiculous that you have to pay MORE to call someone, just because their cell phone is a number! It costs 2 cents to call a landline in Greece, but it costs 20 cents to call a cell phone (using skype)! What the hell!?

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    13. Re:Celebrity status? by grotgrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being charged to receive cell calls makes sense. In other countries such as the UK calling a cell phone costs the caller more than calling a landline. How do you know which you called? Cell phones have their own area code. In the US there are no area codes for cell phones so there is no way for a caller to know. Conceptually the call goes to the regular area code and then has to be transmitted by radio to your phone and the latter bit is why you are charged for incoming and outgoing calls. Of course it doesn't work like that under the hood any more but it used to in the begining. Either way someone is paying extra for the cell phone call cost.

      Some countries don't have this system but they aren't comparable to the US. All of the UK, NI and various islands fit in 2/3 of California. Germany is the same size as Montana. The scale is very different.

      SMS receiving used to be free. The reason for the charges is because of a corrupt market. The carriers have a cartel. They fought very hard against number portability. There are two different radio systems, and even the one used by the rest of the world (GSM) is on different frequencies. Phones are sold cheap but lock you into a two year contract and you are unlikely to be able to use a phone between carriers even if it is unlocked. All this minimizes the ability of consumers to change carriers. The cartel players also by some miraculous coincidence charge exactly the same for SMS. Whenever one raises the price, they all do.

      A secondary issue is that voice is charged too cheaply since that is what the headline number looked at by consumers is. Consequently the carriers make up for it by nickel and diming on every single other thing they can, including SMS.

    14. Re:Celebrity status? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah i'm not sure what he's talking about.. must be a joy of AT&T thing.

      I've got 4 phones, unlimited in-network calling, unlimited nights/weekends, unlimited SMS/MMS, and unlimited data (2 blackberrys), unlimited free wifi calling, all for $135 or so per mo total.

      (T-Mobile family)

    15. Re:Celebrity status? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      It gets worse. Cell phone users used to get charged extra to *recieve* long distance calls. Of course, landlines were paying the full cost of getting that call across the country to wherever you were. But you were being charged for... something... somewhere... too.

      There may be legitimate reasons why certain parts of cellular plans are the way they are. But a lot of the other parts are simply abuse. The companies have burned through all of the goodwill they might have at one point had.

    16. Re:Celebrity status? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Conceptually the call goes to the regular area code and then has to be transmitted by radio to your phone and the latter bit is why you are charged for incoming and outgoing calls. Of course it doesn't work like that under the hood any more but it used to in the begining.

      Wait, you mean that my cell phone ISN'T communicating with a cell phone tower that has its own interface to the telephony cloud?

      Someone changed the laws of physics, and it no longer costs more energy to send a signal miles through the air to my cell than to route it directly to my home phone? Wow. Science really does change everything.

      For the record: 1500 minutes + free nights & weekends + free mobile to mobile == I don't expect per-minute charges at all.

    17. Re:Celebrity status? by grotgrot · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. It is not unique to the US that calling a cell phone costs more than calling a landline. It is just that in the rest of the world they use dedicated area codes for cell phones and charge the caller. The US doesn't have a way of knowing a number is cellular and charge the recipient. This page gives you an idea of the disparities between landline and cellular rates and just how many countries have a difference. Notice how calls to cellular phones are often 10 times that of to landlines.

    18. Re:Celebrity status? by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      Also, you would get cramps in your fingers from having to dial, yes, I mean that literally kiddies, dial a number with a rotary action.

      The kids these days have it so easy...

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  7. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by PayPaI · · Score: 4, Funny

    Math? Myth? Meth?

  8. Let's not be cynical by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Savage's huge following on twitter got him a speedy response by AT&T."

    I'm sure the response would have been just as fast if he wasn't famous and wasn't using Twitter. These large companies have professional Human Resource departments to make sure that the customer service experience is good.

    1. Re:Let's not be cynical by Nirac · · Score: 3, Informative

      Someone forgot to tell Verizon.

      http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/ (blogspot.com)
      It's long (27 minutes) and old, I know. Still worth a listen if you haven't heard it before. Also still funny if you have.

    2. Re:Let's not be cynical by somenickname · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot the part about him having in depth knowledge of explosives.

    3. Re:Let's not be cynical by etherlad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. I agree, and so does Adam.

      "I agree with everyone: it shouldn't just work for me. The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers."

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
    4. Re:Let's not be cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmmm, not the way it worked for us when AT&T charged us $1500 for calls on a stolen phone (sim stolen in another country where it was used at 1.99/min roaming for about 15 days before the theft was discovered). They eventually refunded part of the bill, still left us with a big chunk. So I think being famous helped him a bit.

      Needless to say, their retention department is not going to be successful with me.

      Oh, and they weren't responsive at all before they figured out I actually have the phone plan through a company discount, so it's handled by the business customer services. Normal consumer customer service couldn't have cared less.

    5. Re:Let's not be cynical by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I agree with everyone: it shouldn't just work for me. The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers."

      Why would they? What are you going to do if they screw you, anyway?

    6. Re:Let's not be cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. Funny. Too bad all of AT&T's wireless call centers are located in the United States.

    7. Re:Let's not be cynical by memoryhole · · Score: 4, Funny

      The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers."

      Aaaaaah! Get out of my head! You're not allowed to think in me! ... why do I have a sudden urge to buy Lightspeed Briefs?

    8. Re:Let's not be cynical by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Ummm....No. that is why they have Customer Service departments. HR is for internal use only....

      HR are the people who mandate how employees do their Customer Service. They are the ones who fire employees who are incompetent and approve promotions for customer service representatives who show leadership. It's all internal. HR doesn't talk to the public.

    9. Re:Let's not be cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These large companies have professional Human Resource departments to make sure that the customer service experience appears to be good

      There fixed that for you

    10. Re:Let's not be cynical by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      TL;DW. Got a transcript for those of us who lack the attention span to watch tedious videos?

  9. Verizon? by Centurix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, *THERE'S* your problem.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Verizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not reading the article title much less the summary or article?

      Well, *THERE'S* your problem.

  10. Customer service? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA:

    [AT&T] hasn't exactly been garnering positive reactions from its legions of Twitter-using members.

    I'd say. If their customer service is anything like cell phone companies up here, it probably takes more than 140 characters to navigate their phone tree to talk to a human!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:Customer service? by officer2billion · · Score: 1

      Hey buddy, this isn't a pleantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!

      gotta fix this

  11. these insane usage charges by arbiter1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    anyone else think those companies are crooks for charging per kilobyte like that is complete bull s(*@# ? just loading a damn web page like cnn.com is almost 1MB so that would be 1$

    1. Re:these insane usage charges by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      at time of that post, this page would cost ya 60+ cents

    2. Re:these insane usage charges by terraformer · · Score: 1

      A $1???? Try $15.68 per MB. I just got back from Toronto and upon arrival, I got a text message stating that as the rate for data if I used it.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    3. Re:these insane usage charges by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      /me has been drinking ;/

    4. Re:these insane usage charges by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's nothing wrong with charging per kilobyte. What they should do is *only* charge per kilobyte, and not differentiate between "voice", "local calls", "tethered data", "text messaging", etc. It's absurd that it's cheaper to acoustically-couple a 300-baud modem to your cell phone for 5 minutes than it is to transfer the equivalent amount of data over text messaging, despite the massive overhead of the audio traffic.

    5. Re:these insane usage charges by xeoron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, at the same time, one can protect themselves by using Lynx or W3m to browse the web via a phone.... or just turn off images, flash, video, etc. Come to think of it, sometimes I wish Firefox had mode extension for rendering like w3m or lynx

    6. Re:these insane usage charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does. Install the Web Developer toolbar.
      Then click Disable > Java, Disable > JavaScript, CSS > Disable Styles > All Styles, Images > Disable Images > All Images. Voila. You're now running Netscape 1.0 (sans images); an adjustment to font settings and you're using Lynx. :)

    7. Re:these insane usage charges by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

      ATT no longer supports CSD. They haven't for quite a while now. Besides, where are you going to find an acoustic coupler for your phone?

    8. Re:these insane usage charges by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      Opera is pretty good at it - it has toolbar buttons to disable images (or only show cached), CSS, and so on. I'm pretty sure I've seen similar Firefox plugins, too.

    9. Re:these insane usage charges by compro01 · · Score: 1
      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    10. Re:these insane usage charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, where are you going to find an acoustic coupler for your phone?

      There is a lotta crap on ebay. Or Ghana electronics stores.

    11. Re:these insane usage charges by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Er, no. That just displays a static text view of a page. Where's the "hyper"?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:these insane usage charges by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Many of AT&Ts phones still support CSD. I've been an "AT&T Blue" customer for years. That means I've been AT&T since it was AT&T Wireless. Never had CSD. Phones, however, always had the option.

    13. Re:these insane usage charges by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Try off the continent. I was in Spain where not a spot wasn't UMTS/'3G'.... but I was expected to pay $25.95/MB there.

    14. Re:these insane usage charges by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

      Almost any GSM phone does. As far as the phone is concerned, you could use it as a fax machine if you want. (if it supports CSD, you actually can). However, ATT no longer supports this protocol:

      ATT No Longer Provisions Accounts for Circuit Switched Data. Of couse, who knows except for the people who use it? I'm not provisioned for PAM, but I can, (and do with no surcharge), anyhow). MAYBE possible, but not supported, and don't tell ATT your doing it, or ever them for technical support regarding CSD. A perfect example is that pulse dialing is no longer officially supported by telephone makers, (no real need), but I can still place a call, (if need be), by rapidly depressing the switch to mimic a pulse telephone. Not exactly a supported method, but it works to get the call through.

    15. Re:these insane usage charges by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      i thought most pages/sites served html.gz which could also compress giant .js to .js.gz

      Isnt this default in setups, so a 300kb html/js could compress to 40kb

      But also phone companies charge bi directionally, so, its html+headers+tcpheaders is counted both ways.

      Some cell companies are now auto recompressing larger jpegs to smaller ones transparently by proxy to make peoples
      web experience nicer.

      It would have been nice if the html protocol supported that and told the server, "send all jpegs at 50% comp" coz im slow.
      Then browsers can be configured for slow connections to appear faster. Specifiying 10% to 90% would be cool for the user to be able to do.
      Or even add a rescale by 2:1 all images coz my screen is small.

      It wouldnt be hard to add that to the browser headers, and add a plugin for apache to be aware of this and peform recomp/resize once and send a cached version.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    16. Re:these insane usage charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone else think those companies are crooks for charging per kilobyte like that is complete bull s(*@# ? just loading a damn web page like cnn.com is almost 1MB so that would be 1$

      1KB costs $0.15
      1MB equals 1,000 KB
      1,000 KB * $0.15 = $1???

      Arbiter1, do you do math at AT&T for a living?

    17. Re:these insane usage charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always try Fangs.

    18. Re:these insane usage charges by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Tools->Options (or Edit->Preferences)

      Then choose the content pane, and disable JS, images, w/e you like.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    19. Re:these insane usage charges by stinkbomb · · Score: 1
      Um... do you do math at AT&T?

      0.15 =/= 0.015

    20. Re:these insane usage charges by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about CSD? I'm talking about tricking the voice codec into encoding data.

  12. Famous power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So all you need to do is be famous with lots of support and then you will get taken care of? What if this happened to a "normal" person?

    1. Re:Famous power by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Funny

      They don't offer any lube.

    2. Re:Famous power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just throw a flag over your head and fuck for glory. Followed by folding you over like a lawnchair and hammerin it to ya with a sandpaper condom. And you like it!

    3. Re:Famous power by hattig · · Score: 1

      They do, actually. It's $0.015 per microliter.

  13. First response... by Landshark17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upon seeing the bill I'm sure his first response was, "I reject your reality and replace it with my own!"

    --
    This sig is false.
    1. Re:First response... by Whillowhim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Turn in your Geek card. The corrected quote is:
      "I reject your reality and substitute my own"

      Also applicable to Ahmedinejad when the election results came in.

    2. Re:First response... by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or Michael Jackson when they told him he was black.

      Or alive.

    3. Re:First response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      After the autopsy, the doctors decided to melt down all the plastic in MJ and turn it into legos, so little boys could play with him for once, not the other way around.

    4. Re:First response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sure that somewhere, Elvis is kicking Michael's ass for marrying Lisa Marie...

    5. Re:First response... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Now that's Michael is dead, who will rear his children?

    6. Re:First response... by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Now that's Michael is dead, who will rear his children?

      Watch your language, young man.

    7. Re:First response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too soon.

    8. Re:First response... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      What? Jacko has been turning himself white for years.

      He's like a male version of the Sugababes.

    9. Re:First response... by balloonhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      what's black and white and dead all over?

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  14. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Math busted.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  15. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by tmosley · · Score: 1

    All of the above.

  16. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and this is what I think of her math skillz

  17. Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Two of the most powerful entities in the world are humbled by Twitter. Be afraid, be very, very afraid.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  18. Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T clearly states on their website its $0.015 which translates to 1.5 cents per KB. /b

    1. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by pushf+popf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      AT&T clearly states on their website its $0.015 which translates to 1.5 cents per KB.

      I've been around since data was shoveled through modems that were so slow that you could actually type faster than the modem could transfer, and data was sent dial-up over expensive long distance phone lines.

      And it was still cheaper than 1.5 cents/KB.

      Does AT&T send a free jar of Vaseline with each new contract?

    2. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by FrostDust · · Score: 1

      However, that isn't really relevant. If you had instead said, "AT&T clearly stated on Adam Savage's signed contract it's...." then there'd actually something to argue about.

    3. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the best!

    4. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is if you *call* in, because, say you're travelling and have a phone but no good net connection, they say on the phone it is point zero one five cents per kilobyte. I know, because I've called and asked and spent the same 'stupid' time explaining to them I wanted to know if that point zero one five dollars per kilobyte or point zero one five cents, and had to explain that they're NOT THE SAME THING. So, yes, he was very likely quoted exactly the point zero one five cents rate.

    5. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Essentially this is a way in which they hose anyone who fails to get a dedicated data package, and a separate data package when they travel overseas. In other words, they will ream you, it's only a matter of degree.

    6. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by djupedal · · Score: 0

      I spotted an AT&T webpage that says "$0.005/KB (approximately $5/MB) coverage rate in the set of DataConnect Global countries (on select carriers)." [ http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/international/roaming/affordable-world-packages.jsp ] ...as an example of their math.

      $5 per mb = 1/10 of a cent per kb. (And $5k/gb)

      $0.005/kb = 1/2 cent per kb.

      AT&T has some serious backpedaling to do. None of this adds up...

    7. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough, but what you were paying for you could only use from home; from a mobile, you can do this from almost anywhere.

    8. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5 per mb = 1/10 of a cent per kb. (And $5k/gb)

      Uhhh no. $5 per mb = about 1/2 cent per KB (hint: divide by 1024).

    9. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? That page is fine and you randomly made up numbers...

    10. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5 per mb = 1/10 of a cent per kb. (And $5k/gb)

      $0.005/kb = 1/2 cent per kb.

      My math tells me that $0.005/kB * 1024 kB = $5.12, which is about $5/MB.

      Their math seems fine to me.

    11. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? At 300bps (a common "slower than you could type" speed) and 10 cents/minute (a pretty good long distance rate in the "slower than you could type" era) the final data cost is 4.5 cents per kB.

      (And let's not forget that inflation has cut the worth of a dollar by at least a factor of two since that time, so that's really 9+ cents/kB today.)

      I agree that this price is outrageous today, but it was not all that long ago when it would have been pretty much normal.

    12. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'd never thought of it that way. We used to pay $0.30/minute for long distance. On my first modem, a blazing fast 1200 baud, that's about 9 KB for 30 cents, or 3 cents/KB.

      Wow, they've managed to halve the price in the last decade and a half. VERY impressive.

    13. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to upgrade to the next tier for them to send the complimentary jar of Vaseline.

    14. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by speedtux · · Score: 2, Funny

      It clearly states in the contract that the rates... are subject to change and new rates can be published by AT&T at any time.

    15. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by speedtux · · Score: 1

      Does AT&T have dedicated data packages for traveling overseas? I'm not aware of any.

    16. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and 2 jars of Vaseline for resign the contract.

    17. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to attempt to do math, it's essential that you use the correct units. When we're dealing with this stuff, capital and lowercase k/K's and b/B's make all the difference in the world because they are in fact different units.

    18. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG

      300 baud coupler.. 30 characters(bytes)/second.. 1800 bytes/minute. $0.10/minute wasn't an uncommon discount long distance rate in the 80s, that's about 0.05/KB.

      Doubt you can type at 30 cps, too.. But let's say you're hammering on that KSR33 with the 20mA current loop at 110bps. that's 10 chars/sec, about 120WPM. Early to mid 70s. Phone rates, even for local calls, were pretty high.

      And don't forget to compensate for inflation.

    19. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by rennerik · · Score: 1

      No, you have to pay for the jar.

    20. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does AT&T send a free jar of Vaseline with each new contract?

      No, they charge for that.

    21. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      They Do, but they are anything but affordable, which makes the name of the page that much more laughable. Scroll up, they call them "Affordable World Packages." Yep, like affordable legal representation, affordable 24 month car loans, and affordable ethanol, right?

  19. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by taucross · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you're trying to divide and conquer, any communication is scary.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
  20. Elementary School Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Verizon, AT&T, etc. need to have WEEKLY sessions with every single employee until they all learn how to read numbers like $0.015 properly out loud. The FCC should make random calls and fine the telecoms for several million dollars each time an operator reads a number like that incorrectly. That will encourage said weekly meetings.

  21. What's even worse by lcreech · · Score: 1

    A penney and a half is a bargin compared to the $.20 they charge for both incoming and outgoing text messages

    1. Re:What's even worse by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Huh? I have AT&T and I spent $0.00 per incoming and $0.50 per outgoing in Spain. Either way it doesnt equal out to $0.20/msg.

  22. If only... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    If only there was someone who investigated whether what people believe is true or not. Someone should look into these kinds of odd events and see if they're possible or not. Incidentally, how big are those Canadian dollars?

    1. Re:If only... by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      You get a cookie. You made me laugh, but I have no mod points. Thank you.

  23. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Twitter is naught but the horn by which the crowd hears itself.

    AT&T and Iran are being faced with that most awesome and powerful of forces: human beings. Acting in concert. Each of their own free will. :) Democracy rules.

  24. AT&T Date Card Charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who does not check on this issue before travelling to another country deserves shock treatment.

    1. Re:AT&T Date Card Charges by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Their bill is shock treatment

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  25. Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bill by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This stuff always makes the headlines when the bill amounts to 1,000's of dollars. The real problem is that there are probably a constant stream of people being billed $5, $20, maybe $50 for the usage. When they pass it off and just pay it, then the company lines its pockets with easy money.

  26. Karma's great, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe no on Slashdot has pointed out that [...]

    I can't believe you stooped so low as to point this out an hour after the discussion was opened in a thread near to the top, when several contributions before yours in fact did point it out.

  27. Okay, I'll bite... by tehtrex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    9GB of data is 9,437,184 KB. The numbers don't add up.

    ".015 cents": 9,437,184 KB * $0.00015 = $1,415.5776
    "a penny and a half": 9,437,184 KB * $0.015 = $141,557.76

    Since the published data roaming rate in Canada is $0.015/KB, let's go with "a penny and a half".

    $11,000 of usage at $0.015/KB equals 733,333.33333333...KB or 716.145833MB.

    So not only do they not know the difference between a cent and a dollar, but their system for measuring data transfer is also off by a factor of ~12.87... unless they somehow billed him for .015 cents and then tacked on 10k in fees...

    1. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      packet kb usage is usually rounded up to the nearest KB before added to the sum.

    2. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      They(AT&T) charge per kilobit.
      Almost all network transfer rates are measured (and advertised) in bits, not bytes.

    3. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by tehtrex · · Score: 2, Informative

      They(AT&T) charge per kilobit. Almost all network transfer rates are measured (and advertised) in bits, not bytes.

      Except network transfer rates == speed. Network transfer rates != volume.

      Furthermore, according to their site, they charge by the Kilobyte (KB), not the Kilobit (Kb): http://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/popup/dataconnect-comp-table.jsp

      "1,024 kilobytes (KB) = 1 megabyte (MB). For coverage information and maps, please see a sales representative or visit att.com/wirelesscoveragemap or att.com/wirelessbroadbandconnect."

      "CANADA AND INTERNATIONAL ROAMING: Additional data for Canada roaming per KB is $0.015; International roaming per KB is $0.0195."

    4. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by MrNonchalant · · Score: 1

      Kilobit isn't a speed rate. Kilobits per second is a speed rate. A kilobit is just a small unit of data.

    5. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by tehtrex · · Score: 1

      I know. I should have been clearer.

      The point of my comment was simply that when referring to a "per kilobit/byte" rate I would refer to them as "data usage rates" or "network usage rates" rather than "network transfer rates", as this phrasing (to me, at least) implies a measure of speed.

      I guess my other inadequately articulated point was that in our society's vernacular, people tend to refer to a 20 Mbps connection as "20 Megabit", even though this is technically incorrect. Consequently, most regular people really only hear and use the terms "kilobit", "megabit", and "gigabit" in ways related to data transfer speed.

      In retrospect, I should have been clearer. However, my point still stands. All the providers I've checked (in addition to the aforementioned AT&T) bill in Kilobytes and advertise speeds in Kbps.

      VZW: "The speed of the Verizon Wireless data network is measured in Kilobits (kb) per second. However, the amount of data transmitted over the Verizon Wireless data network is measured in Kilobytes (KB), Megabytes (MB) or Gigabytes (GB). " -- http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=planFirst&action=viewPlanList&sortOption=priceSort&typeId=5&subTypeId=13&catId=409

      Sprint: "Data: Services are not available with all Sprint phones. Usage is calculated on a per kilobyte basis and is rounded up to the next whole kilobyte." -- http://nextelonline.nextel.com/en/legal/legal_terms_privacy_popup.shtml

    6. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's per kilobit, not byte. 9,437,184 * 8 * $0.00015 = 11,324.6208 ~ 11,000

    7. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      consider exchange rates.

    8. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lso off by a factor of ~12.87

      Did you notice that 100/8=12.5? They are charging for bits, not bytes.

    9. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone earlier posted that this is likely due to the price ($0.015/kB) not being per kiloBYTE but per kiloBIT!

      Math in the earlier post
       
      JGG

    10. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I ordered a tshirt from the US once. It was for charity. As the shirt came into canada I was charged $2 tax, the government also charged me a $5 fee to charged me the $2 in tax.

    11. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Atticka · · Score: 1

      Its $0.015 per Kb, not KB.

      So.....take your:
      ".015 cents": 9,437,184 KB * $0.00015 = $1,415.5776

      And multiply by eight:

      $1,415.5776 * 8 = $11324.6208

      Also, I know from dealing with Fido (aka: Rogers) that they calculate data on base 10 instead of base 8 (1Mb = 1000Kb).

      --
      No sig here...
    12. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it looks like the price is 0.015 cents per Kb, which equals $11000

    13. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to see here....Forget the "Penny and a half per kb" in the summary, of course that's bad unit conversion. At a rate of 0.015 cents/Kb, "15 one-thousandths of a cent per kilobit", or $0.00015/Kb, $11,000 is the correct bill for 9 GB of information.

    14. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Drew826 · · Score: 1

      The price is quoted per kilobit (Kb), not per kilobyte (KB). 8 bits in a Byte.

      9 GB = 9,437,184 KB = 75,497,472 Kb * $0.00015 = $11324.6208

    15. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~12.87.... hmm let's take your 9,436,184KB and reduce it to Kilo_bits_.... that means multiplying it by 8. 75,489,472Kb.

      75,489,472Kb * .015 cents = 1,132,342.08... divide by 100 to get to dollars and it's $11,323.43

  28. .015 cents per kilobit by slashqwerty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given the way the math works out I'm going to say it's .015 cents per kilobit. AT&T claims he used 9 gigabytes. That is 9,663,676,416 bytes = 9,437,184 kilobytes* = 77,309,411.328 kilobits. At .015 cents per kilobit it comes out to $11,596.41. The summary claims he was charged $11,000.

    * down with the kibi prefix!

    1. Re:.015 cents per kilobit by tehtrex · · Score: 1

      Except their legal mumbojumbo on all their pages clearly says kilobyte... so either their system is off by an order of ~12.87 in its data transfer measurements or as you posit here, they are charging in kilobits AND their published rates are wrong -- it should be $0.00015/Kb, not $0.015/KB.

    2. Re:.015 cents per kilobit by 3247 · · Score: 1

      Given the way the math works out I'm going to say it's .015 cents per kilobit. AT&T claims he used 9 gigabytes. That is 9,663,676,416 bytesâ¦

      Nope. Data transfer rates always use the SI definition where G = 10^9, M = 10^6, k = 10^3.

      --
      Claus
    3. Re:.015 cents per kilobit by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's actually impossible for him to have used 9G of data. If he had a wireless USB modem, is it possible he had it in all the time and assumed it wouldn't be in use if he wasn't browsing the web? If his machine has a bot on it, I bet it could chew through 9G of data no trouble and he'd never even know.

    4. Re:.015 cents per kilobit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Data transfer rates always use the SI definition where G = 10^9, M = 10^6, k = 10^3.

      If you do the math you'll see the calculations did in fact use Kb = 10^3 bits for the translation from bytes to bits.

    5. Re:.015 cents per kilobit by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      My provider (not USA) actually states my date usage for each day that I used data, if any. So you can see exactly how much data was used on which date.

      9 GB is quite impossible on 3G in a day (I get about 200 kb/s down and 60 kb/s up - so saturating my line up and down at the same time would be no more than about 2.2 GB of data transfer per day). So if it were as Mr Savage claims and being charged "9GB for a few hours of web surfing", then presumably that is spread over no more than a day or two. If it is charged in a single day then it's of course even more suspect.

      And indeed as other posters said, the math doesn't add up: 0.015 cents times 9 GB is no where near 11,000 - not even orders of magnitude off, it's just completely off: 1.5x9 = 13.5, and then I'd only have to move the decimal point around to get to the 11000??

  29. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Not to mention plans from 8th grade of marrying millionaire to avoid math.

  30. maybe one about RT's with exploding batteries by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    maybe one about RT's with exploding batteries.

  31. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ksemlerK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Review each line of EVERY bill. Last month they attempted to charge me data twice. I called them and told them where to look on the bill. I got $50 credited to my account because I caught it. ($35 for double charge, $15 for who the hell knows why). ALWAYS do a line item inventory of your bill, EVERY month. ALWAYS contest suspicious charges. Usually they can be cleared up with nothing more then a 20 minute phone call.

  32. A Billing System Deficiency by carlzum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one should be held liable for outrageous bills like this. AT&T failed to put reasonable controls in their billing system so customers are alerted when there's an obvious technical error, unauthorized use, or a simple mistake. American Express says my credit line is unlimited, but if I try to spend $100k they will decline the purchase and contact me. If I had a history of paying $100k bills they may allow it. But AT&T allows an account that's never exceeded a few hundred dollars reach $11,000. We all know why, unlike American Express, AT&T doesn't incur $11,000 in expenses so they don't bother doing anything about it.

    It doesn't make any sense to me. Most people are unable to pay the bill, and anyone that can afford it has the resources to fight them. Either way, it generates a lot of bad PR and very little revenue. I'm surprised Apple hasn't put more pressure on them, these stories are frequently reported as "man receives $10,000 iPhone bill."

    1. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by jrumney · · Score: 1

      To be fair, banks are required by law to detect suspicious transactions and report them to the government. AT&T isn't. If it wasn't for the law, I'm not sure that American Express would be so careful, as long as they knew they could claw back the money from you or the retailer somehow.

    2. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Apple is getting a share of the air minutes...

    3. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's never the customers fault? Grow up.

    4. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      With their iPhone plans, Rogers now has an automatic upper limit to data charges on an account, which I beleive is set at 100$. So if you bust your, say, 30$ a month data plan, you can not bring it above 100$ no matter what you actually used.

      Not sure if that applies to roaming, which I've just posted my story about below...

    5. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by wwphx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Customer service Epic Fail. I find it interesting that people aren't mentioning that this is actually Cingular, AT&T cellular died years ago and was bought out by Cingular, who later re-branded as AT&T because they thought that had better name recognition. AT&T flubbed a CRM install and it tanked their customer service, and they died. It just happened that the two companies used the same cellular technology (GSM or whatever) and a merger was possible. Sadly, Cingular's customer service was really no better than AT&T's, so you're still dealing with a sad and lonely monster.

      I use Alltel. Driving to work a week ago I got a text message saying that my account had high usage and I needed to call them. My wife had just spent a week on the other side of the country, her cell is an additional line on my plan. We spent a lot of hours playing WoW and talking while she was gone, and I didn't know she was roaming. $600 worth of charges. Alltel saw the problem, contacted me, and offered me a plan upgrade for $20 a month that gave me unlimited nation-wide roaming, and that by doing it, it would be retroactive and I wouldn't be hit with a $600 phone bill.

      THAT is customer service. I don't know what AT&T provides, but it ain't customer service. Cellular service in the USA has always been hideously monopolistic compared to a lot of the world, and somehow they get away with it. Hopefully that will change some day, probably the same day that I can easily buy an iPhone from an Alltel store and not have to deal with AT&T.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    6. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, updates when your bill doubles last months total would be nice, but the real problem would be with cust. service reps who say one thing when it's actually another. Some might see an all too convenient oversight that benefits giant megacorp, I just see a bored 20 something single mother working the callcenter grind who couldn't define the word kilobyte with a gun to her head. She just reads the stuff shes supposed to read, and what does it matter when she says kilobit or kilobyte? Same thing right? One's just the british spelling...

      Now if AT&T invested in it's employees and ensured they were trained, this kind of stuff wouldn't happen so much. But since outsourcing is the answer to everything (except management of course) it'll always be a battle of carrier said, outsourced call center said, customer said.

      And of course they should stop with the per-anything billing. Limit the data speed enough so I can still browse, but torrenting an .iso is out of the question. Charge a flat rate, and don't nickel and dime.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    7. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by sssssss27 · · Score: 1

      Cingular bought AT&T Wireless and then AT&T bought Cingular. It is in fact AT&T. Other than that minor correction your post has a lot of merit.

      I have Sprint for my mobile phone provider and I have had a lot of good experiences with them. I know for a while they had it where if you went over your minutes it would just bump you up into the next plan. You could choose to pay the overage if you wanted to but it was a lot cheaper just to pay the difference for the higher plan.

      PS - Alltel recently got purchased by Verizon. My condolences.

    8. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I've heard the main problem is that the phone companies don't have moment-to-moment access to international billing. So either they A: have explicit opt-in to international data (like the iPhone now has), B: let anyone run up whatever bill, and charge accordingly, C: pressure remote telcos to put hard limits on usage. A only happened on the iPhone due to the highly public nature of that case, C hasn't happened so far. Guess which option they have been going for?

    9. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Ah, I hadn't heard about AT&T buying Cingular. Thanks for the info.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    10. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you like Verizon then.

    11. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Alltel is gone now. Can you hear me now?

  33. $15,000 per GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, even at $0.015 per K, you're talking about $15 per MB, or $15,000 per GB. To do 1 GB in an hour requires 3 mbps. How many mobile data connections out there achieve 3 mbps?

    I use Verizon, and IF I had a data plan, overage for the 5 GB/mo plan is $0.05 per MB, which is 1/300 AT&T's rate. Even a cheap "browser on the phone" pay-as-you-go is $2/MB; still about 1/7 AT&T's rate.

    Needless to say, there's still no way in hell I'd pay $50/GB for a data plan. Thus I don't.

    1. Re:$15,000 per GB by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, even at $0.015 per K, you're talking about $15 per MB, or $15,000 per GB. To do 1 GB in an hour requires 3 mbps. How many mobile data connections out there achieve 3 mbps?

      Outside the US, plenty. HSDPA is 7.2mbps.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:$15,000 per GB by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Rogers/Fido 3G can get almost that fast. More often you get 2 - 2.5 Mb/s.

    3. Re:$15,000 per GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many mobile data connections out there achieve 3 mbps?

      6.67h = 9GB @ 3Mb/s

      WiMAX (tm) can handle that frakken easy. Adam would be the sort of customer it's intended for as well. "auto sync" kicks in unattended (laptop left behind in some room?) and pulls down a DVD image. Bingo.

      Now; about the billing rate. "0.015 cents" per KB means $1,350 for 9GB. "penny and a half, per kilobyte" means $135,000 for 9GB. Niether correlates at all with $11,000... whatever. There is some public school mathematics in the vicinity.

  34. Re:You're fucking stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sir, you get one "fuck" per post for free on the Basic Slashdot PricePlan(tm) as you can see on page 2539 of your contract. We assumed from your post that you've decided to take advantage or automatic update process to the Slashdot Super High Enterprise Class Ultra Premium PricePlan(tm) as described in page 1845 of your contract. Yes, that is $199.99 per month plus sale tax and there's a $9599.99 plus sales tax service charge if you change to a plan with a lower monthly price in the first 48 months. Page 3453 of the contract. Well then your copy is updated. I've got the latest contract here, dated 29th of June. Yes 29th of June 2009. Um Sir, there's no need for that language ... Sir the audio quality on this line is kind of bad and I can't hear you very well, and I'll need to change to my headset. CLICK. BRRRR.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  35. Customers. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    We've got the technology. It's time we start banding together and holding businesses accountable together, instead of hoping that some magical government does it for us. Businesses get their money from the people (ideally), we're the ones that feed them. We can all have control as long as we pay attention. Businesses exist to convince us to give them money for what they do, we need only to work together with boycotts and calling frenzies to get what we want.

  36. Re:You're fucking stupid by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    If you will notice he only had ONE dash before his signature, he took you up on your rebate offer of an extra Fuck in exchange for a single-dash signature.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  37. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We'll claim Iran was humbled when we see some actual results. All we've seen so far is more beatings than there would have been without the internet.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  38. Re:CHANGE? LOL, it's all Obama's gonna leave you w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could only imagine this is a clever Dem trying to make a Repub look like a dipshit.

    Either that, or this individual is 14yrs old.

  39. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

    Or the number of beatings is about the same, only now we're more likely to hear about them?

  40. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Must be nice. Around here it's 20 minutes on hold, then a couple of hours to actually talk to someone who CAN change something, then another half hour until they get tired of you and give you what you want.

    That is, when you CAN get an itemized bill. After three months of complaints tech support finally broke down and told me that I need to have third party cookies enabled to see my online bill.

  41. My favorite quotes from the article by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 4, Funny

    "nobody wants to mess with a man who blows things up for a living."

  42. Myth CONFIRMED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And what about the myth that Ma'Bell can rape you over a wireless phone connection: CONFIRMED.

  43. A little tip: by Anyd · · Score: 1

    When you're stuck in an automated system just scream obscenities... I swear it works like 70% of the time. I think the voice recognition software has been programmed to pick up on that. My old boss taught me this trick, and it was a little unnerving the first time I heard him going to town on the computer voice at the other end of the line, but it really works! Just don't do it in public...

  44. Blame Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come no one has yet done that?

  45. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

    File a formal grievance with the Federal Communications Commission: CLICK ME. The FCC is the "Ultimate Call Play". Only use it for legitimate grievances. If the cause is just, your complaint could cause a suspension of transmission rights on claimed frequencies. (For all intents and purposes, shutting of ATT for investigation of violating federal anti competitive statutes).

  46. Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Does AT&T send a free jar of Vaseline with each new contract?

    Actually, there's a fee for that, too.

  47. Wireless broadband data charges are insane... by Aereus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone else think it's bordering on insanity the charges they want to levy against people for wireless data transfers? (Text messages is a whole other topic...) Even the new download caps some cable ISPs are setting for home broadband are still at least 100GB for a connection you spend ~$50 for. Why is it worth thousands of dollars to send a GB of data when a normal phone conversation is going to take up far more network bandwidth...

    1. Re:Wireless broadband data charges are insane... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're all dumb enough to pay it?

    2. Re:Wireless broadband data charges are insane... by Cytlid · · Score: 1

      ...for the last time... cell phone data networks != regular internet networks. Duh. Cell networks are proprietary crap networks. If you want freedom, use a wifi voip phone at hotspots and stop sending the wireless carriers your money. They made a wireless version of the landline, not a wireless version of the internet.

      --
      FLR
  48. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    Nah, that's one of the things the bloggers are complaining about - that the beatings are more numerous than usual.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  49. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

    That is, when you CAN get an itemized bill. After three months of complaints tech support finally broke down and told me that I need to have third party cookies enabled to see my online bill.

    1. If I sent you a hand scrawled note saying "you owe me US$50, Pay up or I'll sue your ass", would you pay no questions asked, or would you ask me WTF I'm billing you for? I assume you would question the charges. Wireless companies are not any different. If you appear to be a weak target, you will get taken advantage of. You're in Wireless Prison, and you don't want to end up their bitch, so protect yourself from being raped with whatever means that you can. ALWAYS demand an itemised bill. ALWAYS. No exceptions, EVER.

    2. Bullshit. I use firefox w/ adblock plus, 131,500 3rd party sites blocked via Spyware Blaster+Spybot S&D, and my hosts file. 3rd party cookies are absolutely NOT required for online bill viewing. It's only a simple PDF file.

  50. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by Magic5Ball · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've mistaken the mob for democracy.

    --
    There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  51. why is it so expensive anyway? by speedtux · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't understand why data is so hugely expensive in the US anyway. In Europe, you get unlimited data plans starting at EU 5/month (EU 25/month for unlimited 3.5G usage). Or you can buy 3G access day-by-day for EU 2.50/day. Some plans have international data roaming caps anywhere within Europe at EU 15/day.

    1. Re:why is it so expensive anyway? by wizzerking · · Score: 1

      This is the Great and Glorius Unites States where our Government allowed Limited Area monopolies and thus limited competition, so we pay Top dollar for SHIT service. i live 1 hour dri9ve from Sacramento, California and I AM STILL WAITING FOR CELL PHONE SERVICE !!! I have only had DSL se5rvice for the last 5 years because, because I circulated a Peitition in the State government, and personally an assistant to one of the state senators. I get better Internet service in the farmlands in INDIA THAN IN THE USA. AT & T is nothing but a money Grubbing no customer service, that my Grandfather who worked for Ma Bell for 55 years is ASHAMED OF.

    2. Re:why is it so expensive anyway? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's definitely a bit cheaper than what I'm paying right now. 59 dollars a month for unlimited EVDO Rev. A data. I'm not sure what 3.5G I(couldn't find a Wikipedia article, unlike 3 and 4g) is but my mobile speed isn't too bad.

      Fortunately, I got grandfathered in on an unlimited plan. I thought about getting one of the mifi adapters that you can share the connection with but fuck some 5GB limit. I'll just stick with what I have TYVM.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    3. Re:why is it so expensive anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlimited data from AT&T is $15 a month. I think the problem is that he went to Canada.

  52. Solution: prepaid international SIM card by speedtux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't use US carrier SIM cards for international travel: you get no cost control and high rates for data.

    Your best bet is to get a local, prepaid SIM card. In some countries, you can get day-by-day data subscriptions for a few bucks a day.

    If you can't do that, your next best bet is to get an international prepaid SIM card. Their rates are a little higher, but they are still fairly low, and they are fairly low across the entire globe.

    Either way, you get cost control: they can't charge you more than you prepaid.

    Search on Google; there are many companies offering this service. Oh, and you need a GSM phone, preferably one that supports tethering. Most Nokias running Symbian will work and you just plug them into your laptop and they work as a 3G modem; they also have good E-mail readers.

    (Nokias are a bit old-fashioned in that they ask you for every Internet connection you make; normally, that's a nuisance, but for data roaming, it's great.)

    1. Re:Solution: prepaid international SIM card by hab136 · · Score: 1

      Your best bet is to get a local, prepaid SIM card.

      Many US phones are locked to the carrier, and you can't put in another carrier's SIM.

  53. I can't believe they're still doing this... by lumbricus · · Score: 2, Informative

    anyone else remember 0.002 dollar = 0.002 cent from two years ago?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2isSJKntbg

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Only in the US... by torkus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only in the US do you have this insanity. I'm returning from a trip to Stockholm and you can get unlimited 7.2MB broadband for about 40 bucks a month including taxes. 25 if you already have a phone plan. My swedish is lacking, but poking around with google translator I didn't find anything about bandwidth caps.

    Again: $25-40US for UNLIMITED 7.2Mb broadband. Including taxes.

    Off the top of my head, not a single major WIRED provider in the US even matches that price ... and many are talking about implementing bandwidth caps. Wireless? Bah. No big provider is unlimited and you're coughing up at least $60 + taxes and good luck actually getting 7.2Mb.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    1. Re:Only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are actually some restrictions on most swedish providers. Telia for instance have the right to limit your connection speed to 57 Kbit/s after 5GB of usage and the 7.2Mbit/s is still a theoretical speed, I've yet to meet anyone that has got over 4Mbit/s.

      That being said, it's not bad at all. Great coverage and the speed is okey for browsing the web and sending mails. You also get access to a lot of wifi hotspots included with your subscription that you can use for "free".

    2. Re:Only in the US... by Bluebottel · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of any Swedish ISP that uses caps. In fact i were convinced that it was a myth or a thing they used way back in the earliest days of the internet.

    3. Re:Only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm paying $32.95 for 10/2 via brighthouse networks in Florida. No bandwidth caps. The "other guys" knology are offering me 28.95 for the same service.

      It's not their advertised price (44.95), but you're still way off in your sensationalized and ignorant post.

    4. Re:Only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a bandwith cap - depending on the plan it is either at 5 or 10 GB / month. But they don't turn you off, just downgrade the line so it pretends to be a normal modem line. I can live with that - Sweden rocks!

    5. Re:Only in the US... by PenguinGuy · · Score: 0

      That's cause the US is basically run by corporations (through their little sock puppets the politicians) and so they are only interested in getting as much money as possible.

      --
      Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.
    6. Re:Only in the US... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Only in the US do you have this insanity

      Not only in the USA - Sol Trujillo applied this in Australia when he ran Telstra, although Telstra was fairly insane before he got there. It's the uncontrolled government mandated monopoly thing in action or cartel behaviour by the limited number of companies allowed to operate. In either case there is such a barrier to entry that it is not possible for a new player to come in and undercut the incumbents.

    7. Re:Only in the US... by pi8you · · Score: 1

      Does this hold true when you're traveling out of the country? Most of the US add-on 'unlimited' plans fall in that same price range, but only within the country. As soon as you start traveling, data (and voice) gets a hefty per-use charge added on to it.

    8. Re:Only in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      metropcs has like a $55 unlimited talk/text/data plan. I think boost mobile is putting one in place as well.

  56. New Show? by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

    New show: MethBusters?
    Like COPS, but with meth.

    1. Re:New Show? by Bake · · Score: 1

      And that's different from regular COPS, how exactly?

  57. Is incredible how outrageous are the roaming fees. by jbssm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just imagine how much the phone companies are winning with all the roaming crap, it's doesn't cost nearly as much as they want us to believe.

    Sincerely I really appreciate the market regulation we have in the EU, I think it's a great thing for the consumer. Starting next month the phone companies will be able to charge the maximum of 0,13 EUR per SMS (VAT included) sent while in roaming (in here we never pay for received SMS, in or out the country), well, it's great, but the most absurd is that the plan I have now makes me pay 0,167 EUR per SMS sent inside my own country!

    I'm sure EU didn't make this 0,13 EUR price without reason, it's surely enough to pay the home operator and the abroad one their actual service charges and still give them some profit, so just think for a while how much this guys are earning.

    They also cut the voice fees to acceptable levels, and in 2 years we shall not pay for received call while abroad and made calls must be charged by the second (at their maximum imposed cap rate per full minute divided by 60) :D

    So, all in all, market regulation can be a very good thing if done properly.

  58. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or, more likely, the guy on the other end will take your name, phone number, address, and a statement of the complaint. Then they'll reassure you that they'll get right on it, and thanks for calling. Click.

    Unless you're a TV celebrity, a Congressman, or at least an appellate judge good luck getting them to do a thing for you.

  59. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ALWAYS demand an itemised bill. ALWAYS. No exceptions, EVER

    No problem sir - we'll just add on the itemized bill option for $4.95 per month. If you'd like it actually mailed to you instead of buried on a website I can do that too for only $3.95 more.

    Oh, since you're concerned about getting raped on minutes you don't intend to use, for a mere $6.95 we'll let you set a limit on your usage so that you won't get billed for unintended calls. No, that won't help with roaming charges. We're looking into an experimental $14.95 service to handle those - would you like to be in our pilot group?

    The phone company: all about finding clever ways to charge you for stuff that should be required as a matter of law...

  60. Wow, who can't do math? by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    You know it took me all of a few seconds to read the writeup, click on the link and read the first paragraph.

      Anyone ever think the customer service person was mistaken and said .015 cents == 1.5 cents and instead meant .015 dollars?

      We're all human and make mistakes.

      The real goofballs are the ones who think AT&T (or any "wireless cellular carrier") has a data network like the internet. Square peg, round hole. You're only enabling them by sending them your dollars.

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:Wow, who can't do math? by Malenx · · Score: 0

      umm... AT&T does have a huge data network.

  61. Same happened to me with Rogers by Wayne247 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a Canadian client of Rogers, and while we were on vacation in Mexico a few months ago, we decided to use the Palm Treo we brought for some basic web surfing and email checking (swine flu panic, get some information for airports and whatnot).

    So I call their handy and free 611 customer service, and ask for roaming charges. "What phone do you have?" she asks. "Palm Treo 650." She then tells me the charges for data are "Three cents per kilobyte." - "Sure?" - "Yes."

    It sounded cheap, but not too cheap to be impossible. To be sure, I went to an internet cafe at the corner, and checked Rogers website. Impossible to know for sure, but I could find two information: 3 cents per MEGAbyte, applied to ordinary phones, and 3 cents per KILObyte applied to smartphones, especially the iPhone.

    So we used it, thinking it would be 3/KB, but reasonably because, afterall, it's only a Treo and there's not much you can do on the web with it.

    Upon my return, I got a bill for 80$ in data roaming charges. I fought it, had the issue escalated, I even DARED them to "Go listen to the recorded conversation" that they keep on file for "training and enhancement purposes". They finally caved in and removed all the charges from my bill, except 10$, which was satisfactory.

    It's really bad when you are considered guilty until you can prove innocence.

    Rogers do that kind of stuff frequently. I just upgraded to an iPhone and had to call them because each and every rebate/discount I previously had, and each bargain/rebate I managed to negociate on my new contract, they all disappeared mysteriously from the new invoice. Of coures it's a mistake. Of course the system had a hiccup and my order was not processed fully. Riiight.

    But all in all, because I'm quite vocal about my consumer rights and will gladly voice them to the companies I deal with, I end up with a pretty interesting contract, and the services are good, so I'm, afterall, a happy customer.

  62. WTF by uassholes · · Score: 0, Troll

    There were two FAs in TFS. Both were total fucking garbage. Is there anywhere a literate person could read what happened? No twits thank you.

    1. Re:WTF by uassholes · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this troll: Thanks a fucking lot for your assistance; you're a prince.

  63. More regulation on abusive practices is needed by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm really hoping this swing back towards more regulation will put a stop to these kinds of abuses. They are obviously far out of line with real world costs and every provider is in collusion. The same goes for text messaging 'costs', which cost magnitudes less than a phone call to transmit.

    1. Re:More regulation on abusive practices is needed by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually for the most part they cost virtually nothing since the signal that the sms data is in is being sent ANYWAY, they just stick a little extra data in there and plain text is microscopic in terms of how much data it makes up. Isn't it something on the order of a few bytes for a word?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  64. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Math? Myth? Meth?

    Yes.

  65. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I'm not in the US.

    The equivalent here, (which I've done, BTW) is to file a complaint with the CRTC. However, the CRTC regards things like this as consumer disputes, so it isn't interested (I filed the complaint anyway). Canada has a special commission for consumer complaints, so I also filed a complaint with them. Nine months later, and no results, but at least I've added to the number of strikes. When that number gets high enough, they do occasionally investigate.

  66. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Of course. This time I haven't paid my bill in three months. After two they start sending text messages at seven am on Saturday just so you know they're concerned.

    Last time they screwed up billing: I moved, so I called in to update my address. I also had my mail forwarded from my last address. But I stopped getting bills. The advertising spam mail came through, of course, but not the bills. When I noticed, I called in to see what was wrong. Updated my address again, and made them agree to send a bill reprint. Repeat EIGHT TIMES. Every time they texted or called to threaten disconnection I'd call in, tell them I'd be happy to pay as soon as I received an itemized bill, as per the contract, and gave them my address. They started getting irrational, suggesting I talk to Canada Post to see if something's wrong.

    Finally, I spent about five hours climbing the "let me talk to your supervisor" chain and ended up talking to a VP of something or other. Apparently she had the magic keys to actually change someone's address in the computer, because I started getting bills again.

    Of course, it wouldn't be Rogers without a final, parting screwup: a few weeks later I received a large envelope filled with about twenty copies of various bill reprints over the last few months. And a bill for $10 each. So I had to call AGAIN, and sit on hold AGAIN, and get that cancelled.

    Your (2) doesn't make sense. Of course it shouldn't require third party cookies to send someone a PDF, but it's perfectly within the power of a website designer to screw that up. These guys contract out the e-bill delivery to Canada Post (our postal service trying to remain relevant) and Canada Post for some reason wants to send you a cookie before they'll send you the PDF. Since Rogers/Fido won't just send you to Canada Post (they want to pretend they're sending you the bill), it ends up being a third party cookie.

  67. PC LOAD LETTER by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    It means you need to watch more movies

    Actually, he was quoting the movie... You just need to watch more of it!

    Youtube Office Space Clip

    God, that movie was so amazing.

    1. Re:PC LOAD LETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Didn't you get that memo?

  68. Re:You're fucking stupid by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sir, you get one "fuck" per post for free on the Basic Slashdot PricePlan(tm)

    Slashdot is pimping?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  69. t8z5h3 by t8z5h3 · · Score: 1

    lol at rogers

  70. Re:You're fucking stupid by longhairedgnome · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately its only for a very specific fetish....

    --
    GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
  71. Don't have to physically Leave the USA to be Charg by wizzerking · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I live an hour outside of Sacramento, and was charged by AT & T 1,100 because some on managed to use my wireless phones in my house, and call a Canadian Number !!! This Happened twice before i got rid of the wireless phones in my house, and only because i had affidavits from bowling partners for 3 of the phone session, and my son and I were on a trip, was I able to successfully dispute those charges. AT & T was NO HELP, and I had to LEARN EVERYTHING MY SELF. In the end I have no choice about AT & T, since teh Vonage will not work with the Crapphy internet we have out here 1 Hour drive from Sacramento, California, and NO CELL PHONE RECEPTION IN OUR HOUSE EVEN TRYING, and there are over 5,000 people up here in teh foothills you are in the exact same position, STUCK IN LANDLINE HELL, with NO DSL, and our only options is ISDN, or Satellite Internet. Be glad you live in the big city, I have to love trees a lot to put up with this 3 rd world backwater called the USA. I am thankful when I travel to Korea, and India, because there I have complete internet and phone mobility !!!! When is the Government going to insist that this situation is causing the USA to be a 3rd world nation as far as telecommunications is concerned !!!

  72. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by ndege · · Score: 1

    Math man, Math man!!

    --
    Sig Return: 204 No Content
  73. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by Phroggy · · Score: 1
    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  74. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a difference?

  75. Re:CHANGE? LOL, it's all Obama's gonna leave you w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who earns 25K US I am very happy with Mr Obama's actions.

    Go you good thing!