EMC Co-Founder Commits Suicide
The Register is reporting that EMC co-founder Richard Egan has committed suicide. The article has an interesting look back at some of his accomplishments. "Egan had an amazing life, encompassing involvement in the Apollo space program, the US Marines, starting and building the most successful storage company on the planet, and becoming the US ambassador to Ireland. Finally, aged 73 and facing a lingering death, he ended the battle decisively and on his terms. He was never a shrinking violet."
"Suicide" makes it sound like he was depressed. Sounds like this guy wasn't. He decided to go out on his own terms. He chose euthanasia. If only we all had such bravery when facing such a long debilitating decline.
What a coward! He should have faced his imminent slow and painful death like a man: by watching his dignity slowly fade away as he soils his bed and sobs uncontrollably about a life ill spent.
Wait, his life wasn't ill spent, so he realized that everything I just typed is bullshit. Society's attitude towards suicide is fucked up.
Rest in peace.
EFUNERAL
I'm getting a HUGE LOL from the
Solaris budget concerns?
You have options!
Advert on the El Reg page announcing "EMC co-founder kills himself".
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
I hope you know what EMC stands for, because we're not gonna tell you.
May his memory live on forever in our... network attached storage devices.
MAKE IT ABOUT POLITICS! MAKE IT ABOUT POLITICS!
The parasitic life form screamed. It yanked at the pain centers and ticked at the pleasure center.
WHY DON'T YOU MAKE IT ABOUT POLITICS, DARLING?
The right brain felt the rumblings decided to make it about politics for the potential reward. The left brain agreed and began to spin together a narrative. It wasn't cohesive but it's enough for an impulse.
The human considered for a moment. "Oh, wow, a guy killed himself in the UK because he had terminal cancer. What a great segue into a discussion on Obama's healthcare plan and how counseling is good!" he thought.
The right brain relaxed. The left brain got to work. The parasite smiled and kicked at the bundle of nerves a few times. Good.
A rich fucker like him could've easily gone to one of those clinics in Europe and ended it in a more dignified manner. Imagine the poor bastard who ended up discovering his corpse... What an asshole.
He used the Hunter S. Thompson method, large caliber to the head approach.
In the same situation I would have gone to a nice comfortable hospice facility in a nice liberal country where they would have kept me comfortable until it was all over. With an army of lawyers to keep family and business associates at bay. He did have the money for it after all.
In case anyone is considering it, firearms are *not* 100% guaranteed. High probability, yes. Guaranteed, no. You can maim yourself, cause blindness, brain damage, have to eat through straws etc. Due to the circumstances we may not know exactly how long it took him to die.
Another bit of advice, make sure you get your living will and medical power of attorney put together. I've been in a situation where we just *barely* got the medical power of attorney signed in time. Without it it would have been an even worse nightmare than it was.
putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
There is a curious pattern in the suicide rates. The rates among ethnic groups who built the most prosperous, high-quality societies (i. e., Western societies) are the highest in the world. The rate in Japan and Europe is much higher than the rate in, say, Nigeria. Most African nations do have shockingly high death rates, but that is due to murder. Suicide is quite uncommon in Africa.
What Richard Egan did is very Japanese. He concluded that his life would be a burden on his family, his friends, and himself. So, he chose to die by his own sword. He died with honor.
He was afraid of depending on others. Afraid of losing control of living life the way he wanted to. Afraid of pain, Afraid of suffering. He took his life out of fear. He is no hero, he is a coward.
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
mod +1
Terminally ill residents of Oregon and Washington have the option of ending their own life within the existing medical framework. There are strict requirements and a number of checks and balances, but my understanding is that patients who request this option (and receive the appropriate approvals) are usually prescribed a lethal dose of a barbiturate. The high dose causes sleep and ultimately death. IMHO, this is significantly more dignified than a gunshot.
..by this universal glorification of suicide?
I can't judge this man, but I can't imagine that the "good job dying already" attitude I've seen in the article and EVERY post here helping people like the members of "Not Dead Yet": http://notdeadyetnewscommentary.blogspot.com/
That straw woman was called Terri Schiavo.
Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
It is not suicide, it is euthanasia. Big !@#!@# difference.
No, they can't prosecute you. You're dead. Woo, stick it to the man, man!
But -because- it's illegal, they can tie other things to it. Like freezing your assets. All those things you spelled out in your will? On hold. That money you were going to leave your children? On hold, possibly indefinitely, used to fund the investigations into your death, your autopsy, etc. etc.
How about non-legal matters, like insurance - does your end-of-life insurance (for, say, burial, cremation, etc.) provide coverage when committing suicide? Double-check the smallprint. How about the burial grounds or alcoves you want to be laid to rest... sure, you reserved a spot, but check -their- smallprint.. some, especially religious types, don't put those who committed suicide among the others.
But hey, at least they can't prosecute you, right? In many countries, the legal aspect doesn't even apply (i.e. it's not actually illegal to commit suicide). But in most countries, an attempt at suicide (i.e. failing to actually pull it off) -is- still illegal and is often grounds to have you psychologically evaluated at best or locked up in a ward at worst... after all, you're clearly insane.
Or taking the law into your own hands?
That is the last thing I would expect from an honourable person.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
I am all for allowing terminal patients a dignified way out. I don't have numbers on the tip of my brain, but I can only imagine the proportion of health care costs that are incurred in the final months of life for terminal patients. We spend entirely too much money trying to prolong the inevitable.
I really find this "he ended the battle decisively" paradigm misleading and counterproductive. Life is not a battle. We all die. It's not defeat to die at age 70+. The first step is to accept the fact that you and I are both going to die someday. Then, most importantly, to use that knowledge to prioritize our expenditure of time while we are healthy. And, second, when we're no longer healthy and have no prospect of becoming healthy again, plan a reasoned end of life. It is stupid, to fight it to the bitter end, in complete denial of reality. My best friend did just that when faced with death due to liver failure. He was in terrible physical condition (too much programming, not enough moving) and would not have survived a transplant (had one been available) and he died at age 52 in an ICU after a year of balancing shitting himself with losing his cognitive function. He went into his final coma believing he'd win the lottery, get a liver transplant operation, survive it and be back to his healthy self. He never said goodbye to his wife or brothers.
If you like your life, but it currently sucks, how about an overdose of pills followed by cryonic suspension? Suicide in the face of debilitating disease is just an emphatic commentary on the current state of medicine. But medicine will get better.
I'd probably do the same thing. "It's been a good life, but faced with leaving it now or lingering on in terrible pain, I think it's time to go."
Reminds me of the man without a face, the one that tried to commit suicide by shotgun to face, but failed. He was alive all right, but he literally had no face, his jaw, eyes, cheekbones, cheeks were all blown to bits. He had a large gaping hole in his head for a face. I'm too lazy to look up the article but the gif image of him after he blew up his face was pretty gruesome, almost made me puke so be warned before you go off searching for it.
I'm curious... none of the articles I've found this morning clarify whether or not he was a smoker.
He had lung cancer AND prostate cancer. Late-stage lung cancer is horrible. My grandfather made use of the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon to request assisted suicide; we all supported his choice. It's hard not to when you see an intelligent, once-active man become delirious from pain, and bedridden due to having to be hooked up to machines that keep him from drowning to death (fluids in the lungs).
I'm one of the Oregon voters who voted twice for Death with Dignity, and am very glad that my grandfather was able to die at his own choosing, in a humane manner. (I don't think having to grab a shotgun and shoot yourself in the head, plus knowing others will find you and have to witness the scene, is humane - I say it not against Egan, but because I wish Egan had had a better choice.)
People here say this was the "brave" thing to do but living is always harder than dying. I don't know what the man's condition was but thousands of people every day are diagnosed with serious terminal illnesses and face their fate with courage and dignity, without the need to kill themselves as they leave the doctor's office. Millions more live (not die) every day with major disabilities and handicaps that make their lives more difficult than it would be for someone who was in "perfect" condition. This man put a shotgun to his head and left his friends and family to deal with a bloody mess to remember him by. His final legacy will be 'he blew his brains out' that will overshadow his lifetime accomplishments and leave his descendants with a permanent memory of suicide.
Nothing like a gun to your own head on Live TV.....
Budd's the man!!!
Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
Wonder how they feel. If I did that, my wife would kill me.
Well you see Richard. These... 'molecules' you speak of.
They are like children. They lack confidence and there are many more followers than leaders.
They often need their own space and will go to great lengths to attain it. Yet, sometimes they form tight friendships and sometimes, eternal romances.
Err. Navier-Stokes equation? Mathematics? Hmmm. I never did understand why you used such a shallow language to describe such lovely things.
At least, thats how I picture the conversation.
I'm glad that someone here is finally admitting the moral complexity of suicide. Slasdot, while incredibly smart about some things, is sometimes lacking. Slashdotters don't like grey areas. Often, the impulse is either to condemn something as entirely right, or entirely wrong. I suppose this isn't much different from the rest of society- I just expect more out of my beloved /.
In January of this past year, I was VERY close to suicide. How close, you might ask? Well, long story short, I had the rope fastened to a coathook in my closet, looped around my neck, but my closet wasn't tall enough to provide enough height for an instant death, and so I didn't go through with it.
There was no epiphany. I didn't "see the light." It was a simple logistical problem. That is the level that a suicidal person's thought has reached. There are no moral judgements. There is no more fear. There are no desires except one- to be free of the pain.
Looking back on it, I can see that, at that time in my life, I was almost reduced to an animalistic level of thought. (not animalistic in terms of survival instinct, but in terms of consciousness) I had no thoughts to spare about other people- in fact, I hated them for not being there for me.
I still wanted to commit suicide later. Eventually though, I realized that, having lost my fear of death, I was free to do anything. As Edmund Burke said, pain is only the introduction to the grandest of terrors: death.
Nowadays, I feel great. I still sometimes get sad about things that happened in the past... but I am free from fear. Once you face death, the fear of pain, and all other fears seem insignificant in comparison.
But I won't universally condemn euthanasia or the struggle to live. Universal condemnations are usually made by people who are not intimately acquainted with the complex nature of suicide. The only thing I will say is- if you are going to kill yourself, you are obviously free from the fear of death. Why not take advantage of that fact to live a life of free action?
Of course- if things get really bad, and I'm in a coma, or not strong/sentient enough to choose to die, lying there, withering away, I would hope that someone would pull my plug. Until that day though, I am going to live free, do everything I feel like doing, and never hold back.
boy or girls? I suppose it doesn't matter.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
My father died of cancer. He wanted to do it at home, hospice style. He hated hospitals. So I was with him throughout his last day. It didn't happen in a hospital, he did it at home. With me as primary caregiver. I got to be there for the whole thing. I know what you're going through and you have my deepest sympathies. Not just for the loss, but for the manner of it as well.
And as for this guy with lung cancer ending his life - I don't blame him one single bit. It's not cowardice, it's not bravery, it's nothing but making the decision he was happiest with. Could he have lived a while longer? Sure. Would he have enjoyed it? Not a chance.
Nothing wrong with what he did at all.
Weaselmancer
rediculous.
I don't agree with the parent post one bit, and apparently I'm not alone. However, that doesn't mean cosm is a troll. S/he happens to disagree with your opinion, and in fact cosm's point of view is shared by many people, and has its validity regardless of whether you agree with it in this situation or even in general. I wish I had moderator points to mod the parent up; not because I agree with the post, but because "disagreement" is not the same as "trolling".
In a real emergency, we would have all fled in terror, and you would not have been notified.
the Church itself does not believe in hell or its punishments. It only wants us to believe.
Irrelevant. For all we know, hell exists, and every member of the church will go there.
For all we know, everyone goes to hell, or only those who refused to eat broccoli go to heaven, or perhaps heaven is worse than hell.
Which do you fear more?
The hell where you cannot be pricked with needles or the hell where you are forced to bow, forced to beg, isolated, forced to physical pain all by someone you can see and know.
"Cannot be pricked with needles" meaning the afterlife, I assume.
You're making a claim that you have no evidence for.
An unknown offers the same hope that America offered to Christopher Columbus.
That doesn't make it a smart decision. Suppose the Americas hadn't been there -- Columbus would've died at sea. What's more, he never knew he discovered another continent -- he went to his grave thinking he'd discovered India.
Will your God
My god?
I'm an atheist. But thanks for assuming.
The question is, if you are facing the end of your life, if you're right, it's the beginning of your life in heaven. If I'm right, it's the end of your existence -- and frankly, I think pain and a loss of dignity is far better than no existence at all.
And if neither of us are right, it could be worse than anything we know.
Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
Daily, weekly? Irregularly but frequently? Seems like the kind of thing he'd do just the once, not infinitively.
Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
The last two states I've lived in had a section of their income tax forms for paying out-of-state sales tax. If you wanted to itemize everything you bought that year, you could. But I imagine most people pick the option of paying a small flat tax and only itemizing very large purchases. Either way, it's a required section of the state's income tax return. (Though you could of course claim to have made no such purchases.)