Slashdot Mirror


Best PC DVR Software, For Any Platform?

jshamacher writes "I've used MythTV for several years (first on Slackware, now via Mythbuntu) and it's good. But not great — I have a list of annoyances as long as my arm. For example, even 0.22 still has problems playing many DVDs and I frequently have to fall back on Xine. Since upgrading to new hardware, I've had issues with sound dropping out; these problems only occur for Myth, not for anything else. So now I'm trying out alternatives. Freevo seemed promising when I tried it a few months ago but it had its own issues. I'm also increasingly getting pressure from my family to get things like NetFlix streaming working on this machine. This seems to imply migrating to a Windows-based solution. I threw XP on it and tried MediaPortal but could never get that to control my Motorola cable box via the IR blaster. So my questions to you: What DVR software do you use? Are you happy with it? What don't you like? Are there any packages out there that 'just work' as media hubs and for time-shifting cable TV?"

536 comments

  1. Snapstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was looking at making a media center box a while back I was looking at Snapstream which is Windows based software that seemed to support a lot of the Happague DVR cards and remotes. Since then I decided I didn't need the actual DVR function as much as just a box to stream SD videos from my PC to my TV so I took my old XBox and softmodded it to XBMC.

    1. Re:Snapstream? by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've tried many different solutions, and there is only one that "just works": Media Center. I know it's Microsoft and all, but the thing works. It doesn't do half of what MythTV is all about, but it just works. And with a careful set of codecs you can read pretty much anything.

    2. Re:Snapstream? by dagamer34 · · Score: 1

      Add-ins help do what Windows Media Center doesn't do natively. I mean, My Movies 3 is probably the best thing since sliced bread for playing movies.

    3. Re:Snapstream? by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, My Movies 3 is probably the best thing since sliced bread for playing movies.

      To be fair, sliced bread didn't help much for movies.

    4. Re:Snapstream? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have to agree. Over the years I tried Myth, Mediaportal, XBMC, several different freeware TV capture packages, and I never could seem to find anything that "just worked" hassle free until I switched to Windows 7 HP x64. The windows 7 Media Center paired with an ATI HD600 USB I picked up for $20 on Woot! just works beautifully. Schedules, recording, it is all just nice.

      So if this guy is wanting an 'easy peasy" solution I would have to go with Windows 7 Media Center. Just pick up the upgrade version, do a clean install, and he'll be good to go. The only thing he'll have to worry about is if he has some old funky off brand TV card it might not have Windows 7 drivers. That is what I ran into with my old EasyTV FM card, but if you keep your eyes out capture devices can be had for pretty cheap. Better to spend a little money and have a solid eay to use PVR VS going cheap and spending all your time fixing it, at least IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Snapstream? by plover · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean, My Movies 3 is probably the best thing since sliced bread for playing movies.

      To be fair, sliced bread didn't help much for movies.

      Didn't hurt this movie: Love Is a Slice of Bread

      --
      John
    6. Re:Snapstream? by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      I have two mediaPortal boxes that work wonderfully with a Hauppage tuner as a remote control. I don't have satelite, so I haven't tried out the dvr capabilities, but MediaPortal has been working flawlessly on two different machines for years now. One of them is a bit slow, but it works fine on xp and a p3 1 ghz cpu with 500 megs of ram. I set it up with vnc and just access a network drive for content.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    7. Re:Snapstream? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      To be fair, sliced bread didn't help much for movies.

      So I should watch The Princess Bride while enjoying
      a nice mutton, lettuce and tomato smoothie ?

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:Snapstream? by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      I tried Snapstream hoping I could stream live tv uncompressed over the lan to my macbook. Apparently this feature once existed but they removed it to charge for their link program. Unfortunately, it is windows only.

    9. Re:Snapstream? by dugrrr · · Score: 1

      I have to chime in since I was a happy BeyondTV customer. Snapstream's interface was better than Tivo's (an WAY better than Cox Cable's POS). But that's been some time now opting simply for Zoomplayer or VLC ...I don't even have cable anymore...I no longer surf, I just wade in.

    10. Re:Snapstream? by /.Rooster · · Score: 1

      I am assuming this is all so far a US centric debate because TV viewing habits in other countries UK and Europe make a flexibility of a system key. Being able to run a mythbackend (or multiple mythbackends if so desired) to steam content from Terrestrial broadcasts , Cable feeds, Satellite feeds, internet feeds, iplayer as well as locally held media, DVD's, Blueray Rips, Music (ogg,mp3,etc). I admit organisation of all this media is not ideal and needs work, but that being said the latest incarnation is a step in the right direction and the remodelling of the UI and core libs very welcome.

      That coupled with other modules like Gallery, Games, Weather, RSS and the like does mean I am atm firmly in the MythTV camp.

      That being said.. a mate of mine is using his PS3 as his media centre but he never watches live TV anyway :P

      --
      Rooster - A friend. "Anyone's friend in particular or just generally well disposed to people?"
    11. Re:Snapstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol @ slashdotters.

      Goatse.

    12. Re:Snapstream? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I remember throwing a lot of toast while watching Rocky Horror...

    13. Re:Snapstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I third this...my original DVR ran MythTV, but I ran into too many issues setting it up on my new box and finally settled for MCE7. So far it's been running great and setup was a breeze, much faster than Myth ever was. A plus is that there's no subscription fee (of course you have to pay for the Windows 7 license).

      Another plus is Media Center Extender functionality, if you have an XBOX you automatically can watch from another room.

    14. Re:Snapstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried many different solutions, and there is only one that "just works": Media Center. I know it's Microsoft and all, but the thing works. It doesn't do half of what MythTV is all about, but it just works. And with a careful set of codecs you can read pretty much anything.

      Does Media Centre allow a client/server configuration (like Myth's frontend/backend arrangement?).

    15. Re:Snapstream? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      You media center is a front end and a back end, and you can have only one back end. However, you can have extenders (The xbox 360 can be one) that do connect to the MCE machine. You can then stream (and even transcode with 7) your media, view recorded TV, plan new recordings, view the TV guide, etc...

    16. Re:Snapstream? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I vote for whatever media centre software supports all your streaming requirements and BitTorrent.

      Why bother setting up recordings of shows and having to worry about having enough tuners and cable boxes to capture all the different channels simultaneously showing stuff you want to watch when you can just download it? If you subscribe to the relevant channels then downloading is no more stealing than recording with a DVR and skipping/removing commercials is, and it's far less effort.

      You can even set up a service like ezRSS to automatically download the latest episodes of your favourite shows, exactly like a DVR's "season pass". It's really nice to come home after work and have your selected TV shows waiting for you.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Snapstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using SnapStream Beyond TV for a while now and like it, but seriously looked at Windows 7 Media Center when it came out.

      WMC is a reasonable DVR and has the great potential to be a HTPC DVR product that really does "just work". However, the reality isn't so clear. Setting up clear QAM digital reception may remain a very tedious, manual process. I think it really depends on how much help your cable company wants to give you (i.e. by sending good meta data so your HTPC software can scan a physical channel and map it to a virtual channel automatically with some reliability). If they do a good job at it, setting up clear QAM digital cable would be just as easy as setting up analog cable, but it wasn't for me on my cable system.

    18. Re:Snapstream? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That is one of the things I like about Windows 7 MCE-Internet TV is as easy to browse through as my local cable channels, so between Internet TV and basic cable I have more entertainment than I could possibly ever watch.

      As for BT, unlike a certain other evil OS which shall be forever damned (rhymes with fist ya) networking in Windows 7 is actually solid and doesn't crap itself when you listen to an MP3. Of course after being exposed to the previous version my view might be just a wee bit tainted, seeing is how I can actually do things like multitask without the OS slowing to a crawl.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Linux MCE by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only just started fiddling with it, but it looks incredible. Always find it odd it doesn't get more mention when these topics arise.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Linux MCE by Ynot_82 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Linux MCE is an integrated bundle of software.
      The PVR part is MythTV, so may be be what the OP is looking for

      I personally love Myth, and wouldn't change it for anything
      but saying that, I use it as a media front-end only (no broadcast TV)

    2. Re:Linux MCE by EndingPop · · Score: 3, Informative

      LinuxMCE uses MythTV for DVR functionality. It does use Xine/Mplayer for DVD playback. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinuxMCE#Software_components

      --
      My Company - Red Cedar Technology
    3. Re:Linux MCE by nametaken · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This doesn't solve the Netflix issue. Netflix is in bed with Microsoft and delivers using Silverlight 2.

      It doesn't make any kind of sense that a business would deploy any solution using Silverlight, but whatever. I've whined about this before and obviously Netflix doesn't care.

    4. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Why? Silverlight is much faster than Flash, and it crashes far less. I have used Netflix streaming with Silverlight, and I must say that I strongly prefer it to Flash.

      Flash is somewhat multiplatform. For Silverlight 2.0 on other platforms, there is always Moonlight. I have never used it, but I have no need to use it either.

    5. Re:Linux MCE by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 1

      In general I agree with you but Netflix does support non-windows machines as evidenced by their Roku support and I seriously doubt they're running Silverlight.

    6. Re:Linux MCE by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      As Microsoft refuses to release the DRM package Moonlight will never work. Also the Mac version is now falling behind.

      Microsoft will never create a multi-platform solution, all their software exists first and foremost to push windows.

    7. Re:Linux MCE by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Roku has closed source player software, and drm is handled by dedicated hardware.

      If any other DVD by mail people supported linux for streaming I would switch now. I have told netflix, but they do not care.

    8. Re:Linux MCE by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Netflix also works on the PS3 system by Sony. My brother rents Netflix and they let him see movies on his PS3 via an App he downloaded for it.

      Novell Moonlight does work as a Silverlight plug-in for non-Windows operating systems like Linux, etc. Some people want to boycott Novell because they licensed Microsoft technology but when you need C# and Visual BASIC.Net for Linux, *BSD Unix, and Mac OSX they got you covered with Mono, and Moonlight for Silverlight support. I compare Silverlight to Shockwave Flash, just another virtual machine system and they both kind of do the same things.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    9. Re:Linux MCE by PCWizardsinc · · Score: 1

      Mac OSX also works with Netflix

    10. Re:Linux MCE by Kildjean · · Score: 1

      you also can use PlayON to stream down Netflix to PS3 and Xbox360... extremely useful if your 360 got banned.

      --
      Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    11. Re:Linux MCE by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Moonlight does not support DRM, MS refuses to let them and both it and the mac version are falling behind.

      Silverlight is a fucking trap!

    12. Re:Linux MCE by Kildjean · · Score: 1

      you can't download the app. You have to order it through netflix... I know because I ordered it too... it's free though.

      --
      Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    13. Re:Linux MCE by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The poster needs to forget using a PC for Netflix. The video quality streamed to the PC is VASTLY inferior to what gets streamed to the Roku. Being able to steam to your computer is great on a 17"-22" monitor, but once you start getting up to living room TV sizes, you can really see the lower quality.

    14. Re:Linux MCE by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not once they go to silverlight 3.That adds lots of "features" that only work on windows.

    15. Re:Linux MCE by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      The quality of Netflix's streaming video went down significantly when they switched to Silverlight.

      Also, even if their streaming app works under Moonlight, we'll never know, because you can't fool it into trying.

    16. Re:Linux MCE by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Netflix's streaming video quality is sub-par, sure; Hulu's quality is much, much better. I haven't tried the Roku, but I can't imagine that they're deliberately streaming lower quality video to PCs than to Rokus.

      (For the record, I regularly watch Netflix streamed videos on a 21.5" monitor at 1920x1080, and the lower-quality-than-Hulu is extremely noticable.)

      Does anyone know for sure? Anyone have inside knowledge, or empirical evidence?

    17. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      down significantly? as someone that uses I would say it went up significantly. I don't much care one way or the other what tech they use as long as I can use from my media center machine but there was a marked increase in quality when they went this way.

    18. Re:Linux MCE by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm an avid Netflix streaming video watcher, and I have been since they switched from Flash to Silverlight. I was not impressed by the change.

      I suppose they could have increased their quality over time since the switch, but they still suck compared to Hulu.

    19. Re:Linux MCE by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea.

      Their hardware list is a little sad. I was hoping they provided some sort of thin-client which was multimedia capable, and available in the US. Small profile, fanless, with Ethernet/Wifi, capable of Audio & Video and hopefully a remote control.

      I have a Hauppauge MediaMVP, and It's not very good with either the default software, or with the mvpmc open source client (Development has slowed since the last major release in 2007).

      I could build something as a MythTV frontend, but once you factor in the cost of a low-profile system, IR remote, and no commercial/community support, etc. the commercial products look better & cheaper.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    20. Re:Linux MCE by lcreech · · Score: 1

      Then how does Tivo do it? Tivo is Linux based and the Tivo HD has Netflix.

    21. Re:Linux MCE by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would be nice to see even Moonlight 2 supported for linux users. The biggest issue with Silverlight/Moonlight is the codecs provided by MS for moonlight don't include their DRM, and I'm guessing that Netflix uses MS's DRM, or their own for device integrators. They do provide some integration support, my new LG display has Netflix built in, so there must be some ability out there.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    22. Re:Linux MCE by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Because TiVo is closed source, and retains full control over the content on the device. They can guarantee that someone wont just recompile the code with a replacement function that dumps the data unencrypted to a user accessible hard disk.

    23. Re:Linux MCE by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I hooked my PC and my ROKU to my 50" Plasma via HDMI. The difference was night and day. The PC was almost unwatchable. I certainly would not have shown it to anyone as a way to convice them that Netflix streaming was worth while. It looked like it came off of a VHS tape. The ROKU produced a better picture than my satallite. To be fair, my satillite is SD, but there was no question about the huge difference in picture quality.

    24. Re:Linux MCE by Scyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      Netflix's HD streams (720p) are only available to devices and not to computers. Roku, XBox 360, PS3, & some TVs and BluRay players all have access to the netflix HD streams, while the PC do not. Not all content is available in HD (it is a subset of their already limit streaming library), but when its there, it is pretty nice. The HD streams are pretty common for newer TV shows too.

    25. Re:Linux MCE by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Their hardware list is a little sad. I was hoping they provided some sort of thin-client which was multimedia capable, and available in the US. Small profile, fanless, with Ethernet/Wifi, capable of Audio & Video and hopefully a remote control.

      No, it's still very much roll your own, which is how I like it since I'm more of a hardware guy, but a thin client is easy and cheap to build, even mostly off the shelf as opposed to components.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    26. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, PS3 requires a (free) disc to view the streams. It's not natively on the machine like the Xbox Live implementation. They'll be a firmware updated in 2010 to resolve it, some people think it's licensing issues with Microsoft that made that date.

    27. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moonlight doesn't have the DRM necessary to work with netflix :(

    28. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't care because you told them but continue to give them money.

      If you stop giving them money, and get (say) 50 thousand of your closest friends to do similar, they WILL care.

      But since you and those 50K other folks don't care enough to cancel your accounts over it, it's clear that netflix has no reason whatsoever to care what you think.

    29. Re:Linux MCE by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Also, even if their streaming app works under Moonlight, we'll never know, because you can't fool it into trying.

      Not surprised, really. Closed source is a bit like buying a car and discovering the manufacturer had welded the bonnet shut, with a promise to sue you if you're caught anywhere near a can opener.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    30. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a new home and had some Cat6 laid. I also had a conduit from the basement up to the attic run. Anyway, my plan is network my house and get Linux MCE running. It really does appear to be awesome software.

    31. Re:Linux MCE by EvilRyry · · Score: 1

      Such as...

    32. Re:Linux MCE by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      Novell's version of Silverlight has no DRM support, so it's 100% useless for using with Netflix. Really stinks if you ask me.

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    33. Re:Linux MCE by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      The way to pull that off, while not an option to most, is to get a TV that has netflix streaming built in, or a Roku, or other Device. The LG TV that I just got does this, and works well. My only other compaint is that Netflix's online streaming selection is rather limited.

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    34. Re:Linux MCE by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Then boycott their service. If enough people do it, they will have to change their delivery.

    35. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! Please mod parent up. Netflix streaming looks like crap - really pixelated in darker scenes and the audio quality sounds like a tin can it is so compressed. Further I can't watch it on my PowerPC mac, which is a great little media box otherwise. Paired with itunes, rss feeds, hulu (which works unofficially) and other streaming video on the net it is great! It also plays dvds all through front row which is great for tv viewing when you use the ATI all in wonder remote (which doesn't work with intel macs btw)

    36. Re:Linux MCE by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      only intel :-(

      --
      Get a web developer
    37. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't make any kind of sense that a business would deploy any solution using Flash.....

      Fixed it for you.

      Flash games in firefox suck the ram up, prime example Rollar coaster kingdom in facebook, that game has the ability to use over 1Gb of ram.

      If Silverlight forces flash to be re-developed to be leaner then that is a good thing. Competition is a good thing.

    38. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Silverlight is much faster than Flash, and it crashes far less.

      Try it on a Mac. I have never seen Flash crash Safari, but Silverlight crashes it if I switch browser windows while a Netflix movie is loading!

    39. Re:Linux MCE by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

      Tivo HD also supports Netflix HD.

    40. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can try to resist
      try to hide from my kiss
      but you know
      but you know that you can't fight the Moonlight

      (v1.0.1 out now at go-mono.com)

    41. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step one: Get large Hard Drives
      Step two: Download and install XBMC - http://xbmc.org/
      Step three: Download and Install uTorrent - http://www.utorrent.com/
      Step four: Visit thepiratebay - http://thepiratebay.org/

      Step five: Enjoy as much commercial free TV shows your heart desires (or your hard drives can store, whichever comes first).

    42. Re:Linux MCE by lozarythmic · · Score: 1

      The problem with LinuxMCE is that is promises much, yet delivers little. I built a system on supposedly 'reference' hardware, yet even after a few weeks of hacking away at it, was still unable to reproduce most of the features they listed on their site. I agree it does look amazing, but from a vanilla install you'll have a while to go before you're happy with it.

    43. Re:Linux MCE by kgfowler · · Score: 0

      PlayOn Streams mpeg2 across your LAN to UPnP clients. I've tested streaming to Linux with djmount and XBMC with mixed results. There's a bit of coding left to make either viable. -kf

    44. Re:Linux MCE by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      such as DRM. Ok, not a feature I'd like to have, but it means a lot of content will not be available on non-Silverlight devices.

    45. Re:Linux MCE by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Anyone made a hacked client which reports a different agent to Netflix? Borking transmission because it's not an approved platform is shocking (but not unexpected), which is why there are ports / alternative clients for many services out.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    46. Re:Linux MCE by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Sony too - as Netflix streams to PS3 which as far as I know doesn't support Silverlight?

    47. Re:Linux MCE by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      It's not a user-agent problem, it's a DRM stream decryption problem. And no I haven't heard of anyone who has cracked the Silverlight DRM stream.

    48. Re:Linux MCE by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Last I looked into it, Netflix has always been using Microsoft CODECs, but it wasn't obviously Silverlight... thus, it's running on things like the PS3, Roku, and some other "Netflix Ready" devices. So, I looked it up... yup, they have moved to using Silverlight. There might actually be a good reason for this.

      Netflix has always used Windows Media formats and, as one might expect, the Windows Media DRM. The original format is using WMV3 and WMA, along with Windows Media DRM-10. They encode from 500 to 2200kb/s, and occasionally up to 3400kb/s for select video material. The resolutions vary up to 720x480, 4:3 or 16:9, progressive, at either 24p (film) or 25p/30p (video). The new "HD" format (HD, in their imagination anyway) is streaming in VC-1 (Windows Media 9) and WMA at between 2.6Mb/s and 3.8Mb/s, 720/24p for films, 720/30p for video-derived sources.... apparently, they started using Silverlight and standard VC-1 for the HD stuff.

      The argument for using Silverlight, rather than just "a mess of Microsoft CODECs and DRMs" is that all of these things are united under Silverlight. I think that translates to mean "Microsoft is doing the work of putting Silverlight on platforms like PS3, X-Box 360, Mac, etc... so we have no extra work to do to support these things. And clearly, since Netflix was already Microsoft based, they would be prone to accepting a "better" solution from Microsoft.

      None of which removes the problem with Netflix: their video quality is crap. Buy or rent the Blu-Ray, don't worry about Netflix streaming video. Even easier, if you're not a fan of advanced Microsoft's heavily walled DRM. I got sick of them long ago, and the the crap they pulled with the DRM. They basically only trust PCs. Long before standardized HD players, I had this little red-laser DVD player from IOData in Japan. It could play MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile, DivX 5/6, and Microsoft Windows Media 9 video in HD, up to 1080/30p or 1080/60i (though it did only YPrPb output up to 1080/60i), from normal red laser DVDs or streaming over 100-Base-T. They had actually gone to the trouble of supporting WMA, supporting the Microsoft DRMs, etc.

      Or so you'd think. Microsoft was, at the time, selling high-def DVDs, using a "standard" they hacked together from HTML, Javascript, and Windows Media 9, which they called WMV/HD DVD. You could buy unprotected WMV/HD discs from folks like HD-Net, and this player would auto start, display menus, behave just like you had a DVD, only of course, in actual quasi-decent HD. I figured out how to make my own, even DVD + WMV/HD hybrids for short videos... the player was clever enough to ask which one you'd like to see when it detected such a disc.

      But, even with the MS DRM in there, I couldn't play the DRMed versions on my player. I could authorize the disc on my PC, drop it in my player, no go. I could authorize it, try to play remotely on the IOData from a shared DVD drive on the player, no go. HOWEVER, if I copied the data to hard drive space on the PC, after authorizing it, the IOData player actually could get authorization to play it... though it lost all concept of the WMV/HD authoring... it just played individual WMV files.

      In other words, Microsoft were just being idiots here. That was enough for me... if the thing is using the Microsoft DRM, I'll use their competitor's thing instead.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    49. Re:Linux MCE by meustrus · · Score: 1

      What would you rather they use? Flash? That doesn't work well in Linux either. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. That's why rather than using Flash and trying to support any device with a web browser (mobile browsers and game consoles don't usually support Flash very well either) they make special applications on platforms where it's worth their while, and use Silverlight elsewhere. Silverlight works on PC and Mac, so they've covered 99% of the market already, with a solution that I find preferable to Flash (possibly only because I like the underdog software, and ironically Microsoft is the underdog compared to Adobe with Flash). Maybe HTML 5 will solve all our problems. But then, maybe we'll never actually get to see full HTML 5 implementation (hell, IE only got to CSS 2.0 with the most recent version, 8, and there's no chance of seeing CSS 3.0 features commonly accessible from multiple browsers).

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    50. Re:Linux MCE by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Silverlight is not built-in on the PS3, though support for WMV/VC-1, WMA, and at least some version of the Microsoft DRM is.

      With that said... you don't get automatic support of Netflix on the PS3, you have to send for a Blu-Ray disc, which presumably, loads up the PS3 player, perhaps as a BD-Java application. Given that the Windows Media components are already native in the PS3, this is probably a thin version of Silverlight. At least, I don't think you'd need this disc if they were just using the normal Windows pieces.

      I'm not using it... my PS3 works just dandy with Blu-Rays, no need to stream low resolution "HD" with 10x more compression.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    51. Re:Linux MCE by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      but a thin client is easy and cheap to build, even mostly off the shelf as opposed to components.

      Have any suggestions for a cheap set top box about the size of a mac mini or smaller that could use Linux, support HDMI and SVideo, and run 24/7 cool and quiet (fanless)? Components or complete system would be fine.

      While remodeling my new house I chose to only run network connections to TVs. I want a small media box connecting each TV that can play media either through a remote (on screen menu) or pushed from a server.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    52. Re:Linux MCE by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Do you have any recommendations or resources on hardware? I haven't heard of many people who build a small profile multimedia thin client.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    53. Re:Linux MCE by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      For me mostly it's re-purposing old(er) PCs whenever possible as my job entails accruing large amounts of hardware as time goes by, so I'll gut an old Dell (or whatever), as long as it can handle the necessary video card, since the main PC is the one doing all the work.

      There's also some nice offerings in the 'all-in-one' market these days, basically a slightly fatter LCD screen with the guts in the back, and the prices are starting to get good. My best advice would be to hit up some forums, there's practically one for every little niche project out there, especially when it comes to hardware.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    54. Re:Linux MCE by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I'm an avid Netflix streaming video watcher

      While playing Champions Online? Someone with your username was talking about that last night...

    55. Re:Linux MCE by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      That was me :)

    56. Re:Linux MCE by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      See my reply to your sibling.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    57. Re:Linux MCE by majid_aldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      THAT SUCKS!!!

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    58. Re:Linux MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silverlight is a fucking trap!

      Duh.

    59. Re:Linux MCE by cynyr · · Score: 1

      The only streaming i do is to my PS3, and it streams 1.8-2.2Mbps h264 video with 2.0 ac3 audio. It looks as good on my crap TV as my dvd rips with ffmpeg to similar codecs in an mp4.Granted now i'm sure my PS3 is upscaling and deblocking/deringing the video. I really need to buy a HDMI->DVI adapter.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  3. VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just make sure you get the clock set first

    1. Re:VCR by cyberstealth1024 · · Score: 3, Funny

      for me, this is moot, because the only show i record on my vcr is at 12:00 am!

    2. Re:VCR by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      The ten minute free view on the naughty channel, right?

  4. MythTV 0.22 has problems? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0

    You should probably wait for 0.3. Everyone knows sub 0.3 versions are not ready for prime time.

    1. Re:MythTV 0.22 has problems? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      On could claim it's already 19 major revisions past that point.

  5. First post! Torrents my friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whilst maybe not your preferred solution, what better way to "time shift" and "space shift" TV than via Torrents?

    1. Re:First post! Torrents my friend by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Yep, very true.

      I love to find out from a friend about a decently written television series and then find out that not only are there already 5 or 6 seasons of it, but they are all available via BT.

      BTW my wife and I wish The Fringe was in its fourth or fifth season.

      Dammit.

    2. Re:First post! Torrents my friend by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      1. Still has the problem of how to display the video
      2. not every single TV programme one would watch in a typical week is torrented, unless you are a mouth-breather.

      MythTV does have its quirks but it still generally works and in 6 months I've never had a problem so awful that it lost me recordings or schedules. The DVD aspect is probably the weakest point, but for off-the-air recording it's the business. I went through Digital Switchover here in the UK yesterday which required a channel rescan - that could have been smoother, and I did have to dip into the database to repair, but it's such a complex system that I don't expect anything different.

  6. SageTV on XP by FormulaTroll · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use Sage TV (http://www.sage.tv/) on XP (If you're going to end up going that route anyways). It's been pretty reliable and I like the interface. I've also considered moving to Windows 7. I hear the media center functionality built in is pretty robust.

    1. Re:SageTV on XP by jvbunte · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to swear by SageTV up and down. I was a very early adopter of this software and was promised "Free Upgrades" when I originally purchased it. Apparently "Free Upgrades" only applied until version 5.0+ was released, then it started costing money for every major revision.

      It's still good software, however I have a problem with advertising "Free Upgrades" and then skipping out on that claim. I stopped using them on that alone. (Don't lecture me on how they need to get paid for their work, I get that. Don't advertise "free upgrades" if you aren't going to follow up with that claim.)

      I have since moved to XBMC http://xbmc.org/ running on an ASRock ION 330 plugged straight into my home theater receiver and it plays 1080p pretty well, 720p flawlessly. The only drawback of XBMC is that it doesn't record (it was never meant to). Its playback capabilities are unmatched in my opinion (mplayer backend, if mplayer can play it, so can xbmc). It's crazy easy to install and use. I use the genuine Microsoft MCE usb remote control which is supported out of the box with no special LIRC knowledge.

      I use MythTV with a Hauppage HD-PVR back end for video recording, and although I believe there is a MythTV FrontEnd addon for XBMC, I simply share my recordings directory via CIFS and let XBMC mount the share directly for playback. I like the seperate MythTV backend because I have two XBMC/ASRock installations and both can then read from the same source for playback in either room.

      XBMC: Free (Please Donate, its really that awesome)
      MythTV: Free (Please Donate, its really that awesome)
      ASRock ION 330: About $350 on newegg
      Hauppage HD-PVR: About $200 on newegg

      --
      I think we'd all enjoy a nice cold beverage. -David Letterman
    2. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I tried setting up mythTV on some linux distro or other, got into dependency hell, and decided that my time is worth money, so I bought SageTV for XP, and use it with a "USBUIRT" IR-transmitter. It works well, although I have found that the interface has gotten slower (this is maybe my 5th year using it) - maybe the database has got clunky...?

      robertcz@gmail.com

    3. Re:SageTV on XP by RedR · · Score: 5, Informative

      I too have to give SageTV a big thumbs up. I've had it in place for over 5 years now and its been awesome!! I have it running on my main TV with a dedicated box and 5 tuners. It serves two bedroom TV's via a media extender product (via wired network tho wireless is supported too) as well 3 PC's in the house. It supports SD HD DVD (DVD "backups") and quite a bit more. Has support for music, weather and assorted other features that can be added via community packages. It does support changing the channel on STB (Set Top Boxes), as well support having more than one STB. I currently have one using the IRBlaster, and one using USB->Serial. This setup was fairly quick but did require some research on their forums. It is hands on though, and if you want to use any community packages you'll be reading the forums on how-to's. Again mine has been in place for 5+ years, with little effort since then to add new features, or make minor adjustments to storage locations, and setups for it. It uses Java and again for a "stable" production system, I've held back on any automatic updates to the main system. In short, I let the world test out the updates for a week or few before updating my main SageTV box with Windows or Java updates. While you are at it, take a look at GBPVR http://gbpvr.com/ Its FREE, so hard not to have a look. It does support many if not all features that SageTV has, including IRBlaster/USB->Serial to control a STB. My only issue with it 5 years ago was it didn't have as many features as SageTV, including ones I needed at the time. But again, it was and is FREE, so it is well worth checking out.

    4. Re:SageTV on XP by Windowser · · Score: 1

      I like the seperate MythTV backend because I have two XBMC/ASRock installations and both can then read from the same source for playback in either room.

      For your information, I have a MythTV backend that record TV from 3 Hauppage card and I can stream it to any of the 4 frontend I have in the house, without ever using CIFS

      --
      Avoid the MS tax, always buy I.B.M. PC's (I Built-it Myself)
    5. Re:SageTV on XP by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      The TV controls for Windows Media Center are second to none, in regards to PC recording device support (IR blasters etc), but their UI isn't so great for those a bit anal in terms of media management. for media playback I like Boxee a lot, though MediaPortal and Boxee can be launched from within media center, with some tweaking.

      My biggest issue with media centers currently, is it would me nice to have a multiplatform emulation launcher tied in, so I can run my game emulation straight out of the thing. All the launchers/emulators I've tried (admittedly it's been a few years) are very cumbersome to even get setup properly.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    6. Re:SageTV on XP by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Or any form of network file system, for that matter.

    7. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, I too have to give SageTV a big thumbs up.

      A couple of advantages I see with it over the competitor's:
      1) A very open platform that allows mod's to change the UI or add additional functionality (such as on screen caller ID or auto-commercial skip), and a very active modding community.

      2) Runs on Linux, Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows Home Server

      3) Has placeshifter functionality that allows you to watch your recorded shows over the web

      4) Has SD or HD hardware extenders that allow you to extend the interface to anywhere you can get ethernet. This includes the whole interface (including mods if desired) so you can schedule TV and/or watch live TV from any extenders

      5) Free built-in access to EPG data in North America.

      6) Built in ability to play ripped DVD's or ripped Blu-Ray's on the HD extender

      Now the downsides...
      1) Many find the built-in interface is ugly. Personally I prefer function over form, so with a very few tweaks, I find it ok.

      2) Closed source.

      3) Proprietary development technology for mods. It includes it's own development studio (I believe it's Eclipse based) for building mods. It apparently can load/run java code, but I've never gotten too far into the modding side of it.

      4) Somewhat complex setup. If you want to use all the bells/whistles, you need to invest some time to figure out how to set things up.

      All that being said, I love it. Overall it's the best value I've ever gotten for a piece of software.

    8. Re:SageTV on XP by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      I like SageTV except that I have an all-in-wonder HD and sageTV only sees it as an analog device. Ironically, I only want to capture digital.

    9. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used SageTV since 2003 and don't remember them ever claiming all upgrades would be free. Sage has only charged an upgrade fee once- when upgrading past version 4. And, even in that case, Sage only had people pay the upgrade fee for server licenses, not clients. Various users may have suggested that free upgrades would continue indefinitely, but I certainly don't remember Sage ever promising to keep all upgrades free.

    10. Re:SageTV on XP by Rurik · · Score: 1

      SageTV on XP is what I use and love. I've been using it for about two years now and it has a pretty high WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor). My 5-yr old also uses it with ease to watch all his shows.

      I spent an entire three months fighting with MythTV to get it to operate cleanly, and it was extremely stressful. A friend turned me onto SageTV. After one evening it was setup and I never had to touch it ever again. It just works.

    11. Re:SageTV on XP by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons I just put Ubuntu Karmic on my GW LT3103u is that I couldn't get Windows 7 Enterprise's media center crap to associate with my Xbox 360 even when it was plugged into the AP with which the netbook was associated. So, not so robust for me. This was an official install, the trial for IT professionals. I used about 80 of 90 days, but only because I was too busy to reinstall sooner.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:SageTV on XP by andre_pl · · Score: 1

      XBMC ONLY Uses mplayer on the XBox, under linux it uses its own DVDPlayer software for everything. that being said, DVDPlayer also plays everything that you throw at it, just as well as mplayer. but its not mplayer.

    13. Re:SageTV on XP by ubercam · · Score: 1

      I still use XBMC on my original Xbox for watching movies and TV shows. I have a FreeNAS server serving up the CIFS shares which hold the movies and TV shows and it Just Works. I don't bother with a box to record broadcast TV, I just download the torrents.

      The only thing it doesn't do is play HD (720p+), it's just not powerful enough. It still works for Xbox games off the hard drive and all the emulators you can handle. My friends and I still play Bomberman and Dr. Mario a lot on it.

    14. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      One of my favorites is BeyondTV by SnapStream Media. I shelled out $50 for the Windows-based software about 4 years ago, and still get free updates. I bought version 3.7 something, now they're up in the 4.somethings and still haven't charged me another dime. Being able to go to their website and do a "remote recording" that you can then download to your machine is awesome.

    15. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, have you gotten it to play HD content? I have the same rig, and I've tried not only XBMC but lots of other options and HD (even 720p) is simply just lagging. Got all the Nvidia VDPAU driver stuff and all.

      That said, I generally don't even bother having a media center running, but rather just start whatever movie I want to see in Totem (which, with Gstreamer, plays everything Mplayer plays as well but with a usable interface).

    16. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried almost all the Media Center packages mentioned here. SageTV is in my opinion the MOST robust solution. Couple of reasons why;

      SageTV is the only Client / Server Media Center software I am aware of that supports Windows (incl. WHS), Linux and Mac platforms.
      Supports the HD-PVR device allowing use of the analog "hole" on most STB's.
      Supports R5000 mod.
      Excellent plugin / customization support including commercial skipping, custom UI, and PlayOn Support.
      Support for playing ripped DVD / Bluray formats.
      Dedicated hardware extender, PC based software and placeshifter clients available.
      Dedicated and active community.

      With the announcement that Cable Card would be available to OEM's, I would expect Sage to add support in the near future as well.

    17. Re:SageTV on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you manage to get it to play HD flawlessly? Setup, drivers, OS, tweaks? I just can't seem to make that happen on mine...

  7. EyeTV by drrck · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have a Mac, Elgato's EyeTV product keeps getting better and better with each release. There are open source add-ons for commercial skipping, exports to iTunes/iPod, ect and the interface is pretty user friendly. It won't do Netflix by itself, but if you're hooking up a media PC then you've already got access to Netflix.

    1. Re:EyeTV by bluedream · · Score: 1

      I agree that EyeTV is the best DVR product for people running Mac OS X. It supports controlling a cable box with IR commands, publishing files to other servers, handles a couple HD tuners with no problem (2.0 Ghz or great processor dual core processor recommended) and sweet interface with remote recording support via TitanTV (in the US).

      --
      savethedollhouse.com
    2. Re:EyeTV by sl3xd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll also throw in with EyeTV. But, the thing to remember with EyeTV is that everything centers around TV:
      * TV Broadcasts
      * Output(s) from TV tuners (Sattelite/Cable) - and you would want an IR blaster for channel changing

      EyeTV does not play DVD's, or any other media other than that which is recorded by EyeTV.

      But what EyeTV does, it does well:
      * TV Guide Integration is pretty good, with a number of providers, depending on your locale
      * Scheduling (and auto-scheduling of series)
      * Editing of TV episodes - it's good enough for cropping out commercials if you want to keep the show.
      * Good hardware support
      * Easy to use
      * Auto (or manual) Exports to a variety of formats. (Whatever QuickTime supports - which is pretty much anything if you have the right plugin)
      * Easy (and automated, if desired) exporting to iTunes (for iPod or Apple TV's)
      * Can stream to an iPod Touch or iPhone
      * iPhone/iPod Touch interface application.
      * Integrates with ElGato's "Turbo.264" hardware, which is a USB H.264 encoding accelerator. Not the best compression quality, but it's generally faster than a dual-core Intel box.
      * If you have EyeTV on other macs in your network, it can use Bonjour to stream the TV shows to the other machines.

      So while it has a number of features that are quite Apple-centric (ie. good iPod/Apple TV integration), iPod Touch/iPhone application, etc... it still lets you export to pretty much whatever format you want easily. Or, if you don't want to do it that way, you can look inside the "eyetv" recording, and you'll find the raw MPEG stream, and you can use whatever software you want to export it.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:EyeTV by iliketrash · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the informative post. From what I've read, EyeTV rocks. I'm actually installing it as I write this.

    4. Re:EyeTV by iliketrash · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention that there is a plug-in that does automatic commercial skipping. For me, that's a killer app.

    5. Re:EyeTV by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I'd also like to put in behind EyeTV, mostly because it's the only thing that works on a Mac. It's pretty good.

      A few more nerd points:

      * They support XMLTV, so you can schedulesdirect->xmltv->EyeTV if they don't support your locality.
      * Clean interface, easy searching
      * Multiple tuner support
      * Quality listings view
      * Great remote support (its own and the Apple remote)
      * Extensible. There's a Front Row plugin, and a commercial marker/skipper plugin.
      * Super-flexible recording. Create a "smart guide" (in the same style as an iTunes smart playlist, and as useful), tell it to record everything, done.

      The downsides:
      * Expensive. Standalone it's $80, which sucks if you have a compatible tuner already.
      * Bogs down sometimes if you have a lot of recordings/files/schedules (haven't figured out which one)
      * Crappy priority support. I don't know how EyeTV decides which of conflicting schedules to record, though this stopped being a problem when I got a second tuner.
      * Crappy multituner support. If a show is in HD, and only one tuner is HD, it won't necessarily use that tuner. You can mitigate that by the aforementioned "smart guide" - set the guide for "The Office" to be limited to channel 4.1 - but it's a pain.
      * No concept of "don't screw with my Live TV". Literally every other PVR throws up a grovelling little message when it wants to record a show and you're watching TV. EyeTV just switches the channel for you. Sucks if you're watching a sports game.

      In short, it's not as good as MythTV and has actually given me more problems. I'm not sure it's worth $80, but most people use the bundled copy that came with their tuner which is a much better deal. I'm not thrilled with the software, but it works well enough and doesn't get in my way too much. Plus, it's the only PVR for OSX, so you're stuck.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    6. Re:EyeTV by riegel · · Score: 1

      I use EyeTV also and love it. At my house the live digital streams sometimes are a bit weak. I like the ability to pause the stream for about 10-15 seconds and then any hiccups in the stream are skipped over automatically with EyeTV. Do other systems do this kind of thing?

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
    7. Re:EyeTV by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      look inside the "eyetv" recording, and you'll find the raw MPEG stream, and you can use whatever software you want to export it.

      Or, you know, you could just edit is as you want it in EyeTV by pressing Ctrl-E and then export the edited MPEG stream directly from EyeTV.

      And for those who read "dual core recommended" above, forget about that, I've been happily running EyeTV for years on a G5, and that machine easily handled recording, editing, trimming and exporting simultaneously. The only thing that would get that ancient machine to stutter a bit was playing more than two videos at once, but hey, it's just a G5. ;)

      Another great feature that's often overlooked: EyeTV will turn on the computer if it needs to in order to record something. Unfortunately I'm only asking several years to enable turning it off afterwards, but hey, turning it on and having power management enabled is an acceptable workaround.

      My only pet peeve: Automated recording isn't a daemon, but only done in the software itself. So you have to set up your Mac with auto-login, otherwise nothing gets recorded.

      Signed,

      another happy EyeTV user.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  8. Windows Media Center by Sporkinum · · Score: 4, Informative

    Windows Media Center, specifically Vista media center, has worked out well for me. I got a cheap ($250), refurbed gateway that came with a dual tuner card and Vista home premium. The listings are occasionally flakey, and the scheduled recordings won't automatically adjust if shows are pre-empted by football games running long. I control everything through the xbox360 using a $10 remote I bought on ebay. Very user friendly and cheaper than heck.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Windows Media Center by HerculesMO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seconded. It's simple, the remote isn't too bad, it has a clean UI and a bunch of addons out there (greenbutton.com or something).

      Best of luck!

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    2. Re:Windows Media Center by stikves · · Score: 4, Informative

      Definitely agree on Windows Media Center.

      With my multiple HDTV tuners, excellent remote, Netflix, and Hulu plugins, and also Internet TV, it's basically irreplaceable. I'm not even mentioning you can stream to multiple Xbox'es on your house over the network... Oops, I mentioned that :)

    3. Re:Windows Media Center by seamonkey420 · · Score: 2, Informative
      agreed on MCE.

      i've used many of the other DVR/PVR applications (MythTV, SageTV, Nero, etc) but none have worked as smoothly as Media Center, Windows 7 MCE really brings its A game. :)

      i have a remote and IR blaster and mainly use mine to record just network tv; i can also easily access any of the recorded tv shows over my homegroup on any of my other Windows 7 laptops/netbooks and even my PS3.

      MP4 movies look and work well inside of MCE too (atleast on Win7, vista had a few issues w/MP4/h264 codecs since it didn't support it natively). I run MCE on my HP laptop and use a MCE remote i got with my tuner card. Netflix plugin is really well done too.

    4. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with any corporate driven media centre is that media companies often to make up rules such as broadcasting some 'do not copy this stream' bit/flag which corporate developed media centre software will acknowledge and obey the 'rules'.

      For example, a friend of mine is a Windows fan boy and setup Win MCE and set it to record some shows only to find that only the commercials were recording, not the actual TV show itself. Turns out the TV broadcast was sending that same 'do not copy' flag when the show was on, but had no problem with the adverts being copied and replayed.

      So if you want freedom to copy and view shows later, or automatically skip through ads, or anything that might reduce a broadcaster's bottom line then you have to use a media centre that is not controlled by a corporation. /rant

    5. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      We did the same thing (refurbished Gateway w/ Vista Home Premium), a number of years ago (not long after Vista was released). We couldn't use the machine for a desktop because Vista was so non-functional (our first, last and only encounter with it), but we had a tuner card unused from a long-dead machine and put it in the Vista box and have been using it as our "TV" ever since. Amazingly, it actually functions as a TV. Netflix streaming works from within Windows Media Center without problem, every DVD we have tried has played without problem, and when we replaced the tuner with a 2xtuner card, we can watch one channel, record another, etc, the usual things you expect from a DVR. So "it just works" applies to us. The box came with Gateway's version of the WMC remote control and it works adequately (we also had a second one lying around from a dead machine, so we have two in the room that work for the "TV"). That said, WMC is far from perfect. The "Guide" doesn't support over-air TV sub-channels (i.e. 2.2) so getting TV listing for the subchannels requires looking at zap2it or the newspaper (not a big deal for us). The user interface for DVDs is annoying in one major way: fast-forward and fast-rewind. It does it, but when you push "play" again after fast-forwarding, it starts replay from a disconcertingly-distant point. The place in the movie displayed when you pushed "play" on the remote is not where it starts playing. And I'm not talking about a second or two... more like 10 or more. Very annoying. The Netflix interface is somewhat better, fast-forward goes at a dizzing rate, and when you push pause, you get a nice string of thumbnails, one every ten seconds, that you can scroll through to pick a new resume point. Buffering works like it should, and amazingly, we haven't encountered even one instance of playback stopping due to buffer under-run (we have 10Mbps downlink fiber connection, so it *shouldn't* have to, but still surprised microsoft managed to do it especially under Vista). With both DVDs and Netflix (and recorded-TV) playback, the fast-forward and fast-rewind speeds are limited and generally not exactly what you want (as opposed to a better DVD playback that offers tiered/stepped FF/REW speeds... push it one more time, it goes faster... unfortunately WMC does not seem to have this function). The DVR functionality is fine as far as we are concerned. It does integrate with the guide and you can have it record all instances of a program series (unless it is on a broadcast sub-channel). The interface for recorded TV is incredibly awful, though. If you want to delete recorded programs, **you have to do them one at a time**. Really. And it's not one-click or one-remote-button delete, it is "click to display the item, navigate to the "delete" menu option, click/remote-button, then confirm you want to do it, then go back to main recorded-TV menu, and find the next *ONE* item you want to delete. If you have very many, you might as well just find the media folder on your hard drive and do it via windows explorer.

      But since you mentioned family and "it just works", and as much as I hate to say microsoft is useful for anything, WMC under vista satisfies the "it just works" requirement (lamely in some respects, but works nonetheless). Most of the time, it goes weeks without ever having to mess with the keyboard, we can just use it as the "TV" (DVD/netflix) via the remote controls as if it were a "TV".

    6. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hulu plugins?

    7. Re:Windows Media Center by MrPhilby · · Score: 1

      Very happy with XP MCE for 3 years now. I didn't like the Vista one due to codec issues. Very robust. Sometimes forgets my "favorite" channels though.

    8. Re:Windows Media Center by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've got Windows 7 Media center running with a Linksys Media Center Extender.

      On the positive side, It Just Works. Having a paperback sized MCE (cheap on Ebay, BTW) next to the big-screen rather than a PC is very nice.

      On the negative side, Microsoft keeps trying so hard to prevent users from doing what they'd like.
      For example, they changed to the .wtv file format late in the Vista cycle, which broke things like dvrmstoolbox that was used for commercial skipping, and had no desire to help fix it. That's fixed by the community now, of course.

      They also broke ripped DVD playback on the extender. For the Vista media center, it was found that by creating a hard link to the DVD files (and giving the hard link a ".mp4" (IIRC) extension), DVD's would play fine on the extender. With Windows 7, sorry, but that workaround has been disabled.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    9. Re:Windows Media Center by Simulant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, MCE is pretty good as a out-of-the-box DVR. However, it can suck if you regularly download video to watch. It can neither play much of it (out-of-the-box) nor does it organize it very well. Be pepared to tweak.

      I also find it to be a bit piggish on resources. The interface is slower than I'm used to. It is often useless if accessing shared files over a wireless connection as it spends too much time & bandwidth indexing generating thumbnail previews to playback video properly. (on a 150Mbps (maybe 30-50 actual) N connection) Again, be prepared to tweak.

      I find it to be absolutely horrible if you have a very large (thousands of files) and dynamic collection of multimedia files. (I'm looking at about 250GB of music and a TB of video) My stuff is organized well enough in the file system and I'd prefer my media center not index it but just use the existing directory structure.

      MCE is pretty and works OK if you have a small/stable multimedia collection and also use it in the fairly limited way that Microsoft wants/expects you to but I prefer Media Portal. (http://www.team-mediaportal.com/) It also requires tweaking but is far, FAR more flexible, and the end result works better for me.

      Finally, MCE on 7 is an improvement over MCE on Vista, but hey, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    10. Re:Windows Media Center by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      I have Windows Media Center on Windows 7 Pro 64-bit connecting to Xbox360 and it does NOT just work.
      It's constantly adding videos to the library and videos that are in my video library do not show up. Viewing my photo collection is painfully slow over 100mb wired ethernet. I do not understand how people can like that software! Of course, I must be doing something wrong but how does one troubleshoot MS software...?

    11. Re:Windows Media Center by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      I've used Windows Media Center as well and found that the listings are virtually non-existent for HD OTA programming. Most of the time, the HD channels won't even show up in the listing (specifically sub-channels, like 4-2, 4-3, etc, only 4-1 would show up normally). You can sometimes find a cable service that includes the same channels and remap them, but it's a HUGE PITA. This is true for WinXP and Vista, although I haven't tried Windows 7 yet. Anyone know if they fixed it yet?

    12. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I setup MythTV a few years ago and spent many days getting things setup, like IR receiver, tuner, EPG, 5.1 pass through. It was a bit like torture, and my family found it difficult to understand why I was introducing a computer into the TV watching equation.

      I considered using FrontRow for a while, but there was no integrated DTV component at that time (before EyeTV integrated). I then installed Vista media center, and things were a lot better. There were some gripes with Vista MC however:
        - requiring a hack to get the EPG to work in Australia,
        - the live TV buffer was pretty short,
        - if you started recording after already watching half a show, the recording would only start from when you hit record - not including the buffer.

      I recently installed Windows 7 and find it even more refined. For instance, the photo library automatically display when no video is playing, it now plays h264 out of the box, you get a little preview image when scanning back/forwards in a video.

      My original concerns with Windows were

        - no UPnP player service, so no standard control of player over IP network
        - proprietary recording format that can't be used by other digital video players on the network.

      but the fact that I don't have to waste my time maintaining MythTV and the family can use it have led be to accept MCE as a good thing.

    13. Re:Windows Media Center by DarkMagician07 · · Score: 1

      The Windows Media Center in Windows 7 blows Vista's out of the water for me. I currently have a PC connected to the TV with Vista on it, and refuse to use the media center. Instead, I stream media center to our Xbox from my Windows 7 machine to have access to much more content, including netflix. The only thing I haven't tried yet is to watch a blu-ray through it, but I have a PS3 for those and don't mind switching over to watch them. Vista's MC doesn't have access to as much content as the MC in Windows 7. There's actually full TV shows available now, instead of the clips that Vista gives you. If possible, I'd get a copy of 7 and put it on a machine. The RC of 7 I'm running on our HTPC is on some fairly mediocre hardware: Intel 2.8 Dual Pentium, Gigabyte board with Intel HD4000 integrated graphics, and 2 GB of RAM. I think the whole system cost me $200 to build using an old case and power supply and a couple of small harddrives I had lying around.

    14. Re:Windows Media Center by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I have an old Sony Media Center PC running XP that drops frames like crazy, but that might be the fault of the crappy, overpriced Sony hardware rather than the crappy, overpriced Microsoft software. It even drops frames while watching live television; as near as I can tell, in order to enable pause/rewind features it always compresses the content, writes it to disk, treads it back off disk,

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    15. Re:Windows Media Center by DarkMagician07 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious as I have almost the exact same setup (7 Home Premium instead of Pro) and haven't run into this type of issue (yet). Since they both use the same Media Center, I can bet that this will happen later if it's going to. I have it checking a library that has approximately 200 videos, though I haven't tried the photo stuff yet. I don't really have a need to view my pictures on the TV, so I didn't get into it.

      The real reason I like WMC is simply that it's easy. The interface is actually fairly clear and quick to understand, and that makes it easier for my kids to use it as well.

    16. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thats not entirely correct - Windows 7 has inbuilt right click function to quickly convert any *wtv to a dvrms file. So yea, it might take an extra step to use those old tools, but you can use them nonetheless. I know a few people who set up scripts to automatically convert everything to dvr-ms once per day.

      But really, if you are the type using dvrmstoolbox, you would be the type who would know how to convert your wtv files. and its not like it takes long.

      WTV isnt about preventing people from doing things. I say changing the container format is BETTER than simply changing how the original works. PRogress has to happen somehow, and in this case, they chose to change the container name, rather that update the existing. This makes things much less confusing from a compatibility point of view.

    17. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use windows 7 media center and have done since RC. currently I have about 6 TB's of video and I don't find any of the issues you say you have with it. It is fast and uses very little resources (I run 3 extenders off it and have 2 HDhomeruns streaming into it), the interface is snappy and I very rarely find anything that it can't play, given it plays divx out of the box and that is one of the most common download formats content type is almost never an issue.

    18. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No question, on a PC platform, the MCE is the best. Use DVD Fab to rip the dvds, and on the new Windows 7 version of MCE, it will play any codec natively, basically. Easy to use.

    19. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "tweak" for supporting a lot of downloaded video in MCE is to install the codecs and filters for the formats. You can get 90% of what you want by grabbing one of the large community packs.

    20. Re:Windows Media Center by wolrahnaes · · Score: 4, Informative

      One more vote for MCE.

      -CableCARD support
      -Netflix client built in (though no HD for now)
      -Great remote
      -Very simple but functional UI
      -Free if you have a half-decent edition of either of the last two Windows releases
      -Xbox (with software), Xbox 360, and numerous other devices supported as extenders for a single central home DVR

      I won't give up my HD cable channels, so Windows MCE, TiVo, and Moxi are the three options, end of story. Only one of those allows me to build my own machine and centralize all the tuners. If Myth or one of the others gains CableCARD support in the future, they might be worth considering. Until then...

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    21. Re:Windows Media Center by afidel · · Score: 1

      And soon you will be able to get a CableCard interface for homebrew Win7 MCE boxes (expected Q1) with support for M-card's for recording up to 4 streams simultaneously.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    22. Re:Windows Media Center by Scyber · · Score: 1

      CableCARD support is key. The OP mentioned recording from cable, so unless he wishes to be limited to only the broadcast networks he will need a cableCARD to record the other digital channels. Its not even just the HD channels either, once a cable provider goes digital, most (if not all) of the SD version of the non-broadcast networks are encrypted. All of the major cable providers are planning to go all digital in the next few years if they aren't already.

    23. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      He is a PAYING customer. There is no reason for anyone to belittle him. Certainly some nobody corporate boot licker has any business giving him grief.

      If I am an HBO subscriber and I record a show, I want to be able to play it in any room I like.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Windows Media Center by Simulant · · Score: 1

      I'm generally downloading h.264 .mkvs which are definitely not supported out of the box... and not possible to play at all with subtitles, the last time I looked. (probably a work around by now)

      I can get mkvs to work in Win7 MCE but I'm still not happy with the interface or performance in general. I've also seen instances where the exact same tweaks on comparable hardware work one one PC but stutter on the next. (not necessarily MCE's fault but I don't have this issue with other MC software on the same hardware)

      MCE is nice and has come a long way but it's not exactly intended for use with random downloadable content of dubious legality and never will be. MCE updates have a tendency to undo or break my tweaks which, while not surprising, is unacceptable.

      Just my opinion. Use what works for you.

    25. Re:Windows Media Center by initdeep · · Score: 1

      they fixed it for vista with the tv pack
      it's been well "fixed" in win 7

      engadgethd had a very good rundown on win7 mc

    26. Re:Windows Media Center by initdeep · · Score: 1

      google hulu destop

      it can be made to launch from within wmc and when closed will revert you back to wmc.

    27. Re:Windows Media Center by initdeep · · Score: 1

      the only "codec pack" you ever need for win7 is shark007's.

      the others are merely bloated piles of shit.

      shark's is lean and only adds those not already natively supported, doesnt try to change you to another player, and is fully customizable via an easy gui.

      and the only reason most people even need it is for mkv and flac support.

    28. Re:Windows Media Center by AnonGCB · · Score: 1

      I've got a CableCARD compliant tuner in my HTPC, check out http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/06/new-utility-makes-any-computers-bios-cablecard-ready/

      Works like a charm.

      --
      http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    29. Re:Windows Media Center by afidel · · Score: 1

      The ATI's go for ridiculous sums on ebay last I checked. There are a whole bunch of vendors targeting new products at Q1 since the official announcement from CableLabs.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    30. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "Windows 7 MCE"

      Since Microsoft decided to make it's PVR embedded into the OS it requires anyone
      interested in a newer version to make a much bigger change just to get access to
      what's really just one updated app.

      The fact that "Windows 7 is fine" is nice and all but this is a very basic sort
      of thing that shouldn't require a bleeding edge release to sort out. If you can't
      chime in with a comment like "well it works just fine in XP MCE" then it's rubbish.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    31. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Been there. Did that. Didn't help.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    32. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That nonsense again...

      Can I get a cable card decoder at Best Buy or Frys?

      Othwerwise, it's just more vaporware.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    33. Re:Windows Media Center by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      . The "Guide" doesn't support over-air TV sub-channels (i.e. 2.2) so getting TV listing for the subchannels requires looking at zap2it or the newspaper (not a big deal for us).

      Windows 7 media center does, and it works great. You can even remap channels if the guide data is wrong, which is wonderful for picking up clear QAM channels from the cable company (for example, if you have the $10-$15/mo "basic" cable, you can get local and possibly a few cable channels this way).

    34. Re:Windows Media Center by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      I just haven't figured out yet how to "right-click" a file from the remote talking to the media center extender. The PC running WMC is headless and stuffed under the desk in the back bedroom.

      I know I'm just whining; but I no longer enjoy the one-upsmanship of constantly trying to get around roadblocks purposely put in my way. If MythTV trivially supported a guide, and worked with an extender, I'd spend the month to figure out how to get it set up just so I wouldn't have to screw with it again. /frank

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    35. Re:Windows Media Center by Osty · · Score: 1

      Or buy PlayOn ($20 for the holidays) and use vmcPlayIt.

    36. Re:Windows Media Center by Osty · · Score: 1

      You again? Get off it. You're wrong and you know it. Rather than rehash this all over again, I'll just link to this and save us all the trouble of explaining why you're wrong.

    37. Re:Windows Media Center by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Media Browser solves a lot of the problems with playing downloaded video, providing a far better interface for browsing things then the default Media Centre one. I had the same problem with the almost unusable video browser in MCE 7, but now that I'm using Media Browser I'm a lot happier.

      I've still not found anything to do music nicely, but I'm not really bothered about that personally, since I stream that to an AirTunes base station from iTunes.

    38. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yes. Me again.

      I will always be here to point out the obvious bullshit.

      Dead links and stuff that's always "out of stock" on websites simple doesn't cut it.

      I can (and have) bought gear straight from Hauppauge or at Microcenter or Frys.

      Cable Card tuners are trumpeted as this great "killer feature" for a medicore product when infact
      that aren't really generally available (if at all) and come with all sorts of bullshit requirements
      and gotchas.

      A bird in the hand isn't worth just 2 in the bush, it's worth 10.

      If you want to record HD cable you can go to your local Frys RIGHT NOW and get yourself something that isn't vaporware.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    39. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Boot licker? Catch cancer, freeject.

      Nope. PAYING CUSTOMER.

      HDNET in particular has some stuff that's nice for showing of the potential of HDTV.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    40. Re:Windows Media Center by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind using a different player for those softsubbed MKVs, I strongly recommend SMPlayer, a well-designed front-end for mplayer. The Windows version includes an up-to-date mplayer build as well. I use the Linux version for this task, and it's superb including support for vdpau on my NVIDIA card. I do build my own mplayer binaries from the CVS snapshots, though, then tell smplayer to use the one I have in /usr/local/bin rather than the stock Ubuntu release. A quick "apt-get build-dep mplayer-nogui" will get all the development files you need to compile mplayer.

    41. Re:Windows Media Center by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Very user friendly and cheaper than heck.

      I sure hope so, Heck's products are expensive as hell.

    42. Re:Windows Media Center by frission · · Score: 1

      i basically did the same thing, and agree, it works great. i have a Win7 Premium (comes w/ media center) and the hauppage HD dual tuner card (about $130). i got a refurb dell (dual core 2.8) for about $230. downstairs, i have the computer hooked up to the TV to watch it directly, or i can stream to the xbox 360 upstairs. it does netflix, and any other show that is available on the web :) right now i have a "broadcast" cable subscription, basically because i didn't have much luck with OTA antennas. my cable bill went down from $60 to $12, so it'll pay for itself in no time. i mostly watch network TV and DVDs anyway. i will miss adult swim though

    43. Re:Windows Media Center by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      I was not a fan of it on Vista, but it is actaully REALLY good on Windows 7 - mainly because it seems to work wtih Professional (Vista did not have Media Center in the Business edition). That said, my ATI HD TV Wonder does not work with anything other than XP. But I am starting to hate the thing anyway and just buy me a Haupeg card that has component and SPIDIF input.

    44. Re:Windows Media Center by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, TV Pack only applies to certain OEMs(HP and Dell from what I understand). I haven't been able to find a version I could install.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    45. Re:Windows Media Center by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      but you can't build a custom windows pc with cablecard card support.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    46. Re:Windows Media Center by Osty · · Score: 1

      Cable Card tuners are trumpeted as this great "killer feature" for a medicore product when infact that aren't really generally available (if at all) and come with all sorts of bullshit requirements and gotchas.

      You really don't understand how markets work, do you? CableCard tuners are not vaporware. They were "restricted" sale items for the past couple of years, and only recently (as in the past 1.5 months) have you been able to use them without a special OCUR BIOS. As such, the market hasn't had time to catch up. It goes something like this:

      • CableLabs announces CableCard PC support with a bunch of restrictions, both on what PCs can use these tuners and what certifications are required for companies to build tuner products.
      • ATI decides to build a tuner (external and internal versions). Requires jumping through a lot of arbitrary hoops, but it gets done. Other tuner manufacturers don't believe the market is big enough to bother with, so nobody else builds a digital cable tuner.
      • Microsoft adds necessary support to MCE for the new CableCard tuners.
      • System builders go through all of the hoops required to build machines that pass CableLabs requirements (inevitably, these machines are $2000+ and limited availability).
      • Enthusiasts figure out how to hack around the OCUR BIOS requirement, but being a hack this doesn't instill confidence in the market and other tuner manufacturers still don't get in the game.
      • Fast forward to September 2009, where Microsoft announces that they've worked with CableLabs to remove the OCUR BIOS restrictions on using tuner cards in Windows 7. Users can now use these tuners with cheap PCs, rather than having to spend $2000+ for one with a special BIOS. CableLabs does not remove the certification requirements for developers building new tuners, updating firmware, etc (that is, it's still expensive and time consuming to build a digital cable tuner).
      • Several companies, including Ceton and Hauppauge, announce that they are in the process of building new digital cable tuners that will be on the market "soon" (Hauppauge claims "end of 2009", Ceton still says "Q1 2010"). Given when the announcement happened, CableLabs' still onerous certification process, time required to manufacture product, etc, that's a pretty aggressive schedule. In the meantime, ATI tuners are slowly becoming more available. ATI has mentioned in the past that they want out of the digital cable tuner business, so you'll probably never see the ATI offerings in B&M stores. But Hauppauge, Ceton, etc should all eventually make it there.

      We're now in the slightly annoying period of time where restrictions on the type of PC where you can use digital cable tuners have been lifted, but there aren't many tuners on the market and the ones that are available are expensive and hard to find. This will get better. Your "alternative" of using a component capture card + IR blaster to control a set top box is not really much of an option to anybody who actually cares about this. Video and audio quality are worse. CPU load is increased because of having to re-encode. Using multiple "tuners" requires a one-to-one mapping of capture cards to set top boxes, which is expensive and unsustainable. If you must go that route, at least use the firewire output of an STB (same issues with tuning, but skips the re-encoding issues because you're getting a digital copy of the output). That's fine as a stop-gap measure while companies work on bringing new tuners to market. You'll get the best experience if you buy a digital cable tuner.

    47. Re:Windows Media Center by mzs · · Score: 1

      That happened to me too. Fox was having issues here. It was more goof-up rather than mal-intent. One time it was an ad that set the flag but did not unset it at the end of the ad. So then nothing recorded for hours until they fixed it.

    48. Re:Windows Media Center by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Do you have file indexing turned off?

    49. Re:Windows Media Center by mattprokes · · Score: 1

      I agree regarding using windows here. It is a well known fact that the experience windows brings regarding compatibility to media/games has long been sought after. While I am a huge linux fan; and the only windows pc in our house is the MCE, I honestly am not interested in diving into compatibility issues of other systems especially when I know things like moonlight do not work on netflix. What if I want to play games off of what is basically a PC hooked up to the tv? I would just rather keep it simple, and use the copy of windows that came with my $300 black friday emachine which has MCE. I don't even HAVE to use the MCE, maybe even just VLC - I mean it is just a pc. I spose if you want a pretty looking thing there is MCE, but for me all I want is a computer desktop on the TV and I will take it from there. If anyone is wondering the logitech diNovo works excellent with this system.

      --
      Meanderings Of A Software Engineer http://www.mattprokes.com
  9. I'm curious myself. by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the freedom of MythTV, I've been running it for about 4 years now, but it can often be tricky to get working if there is a problem. Particularly if there is a MySQL problem when I don't have a great deal of expertize in database administration. I'd like to take advantage of the new cable-card hardware coming out for high definition too.

    Right now it pretty much seems either windows media center or giving in and getting a TiVO, but I'm curious about some of the other things out there like Sage TV. Sadly, not everything is available online right now without having to go to bit-torrent, especially high-def content.

    1. Re:I'm curious myself. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You can get hidef over component, their is a happauge product that uses them and is supported in myth.

    2. Re:I'm curious myself. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I gave in and went with the provider's DVR, since I really wanted all the premium HD channels. I use Boxee for my local media playback though.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    3. Re:I'm curious myself. by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Try LinHES (aka Knoppmyth). It's purely a MythTV based Distro that is heading towards becoming as easy to setup as any Appliance. The forums are full of very very knowledgeable people and they now have proper repositories with software, tested and packaged specifically for the distro. I've been using Knoppmyth/LinHES as my TV Tuner/Recorder etc for around the same amount of time. I have to say they have made significant advances in recent times. It's much much easier to setup, I can have the box installed, using EIT (over the air) for my guide data in under half an hour. Heck, post the initial setup, if you have a supported remote, you can sit back and do it all from the comfort of your chair!

      I have looked at alternatives and they all seemed to require more work to setup than I was preparred to undertake. It was fun in the early days, but I've moved on to different projects now, I just want my TV to work and so does my Fiancé (who is not a nerd/geek like me!). The most major piece of work I did to the box in the last 6 months, changed my TV guide from IceTV (paid for service) to Shepherd (free service) and that was pretty straight forward, pacman -S shepherd (it could even be in the menu somewhere, but I'm a cli junkie), run through the shepherd config... 10 mins later, new guide data from a new source and I haven't touched it since!

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
  10. Windows Media Center by coolmoose25 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I set up Windows Media Center on Vista and I like the way it works. It's pretty simple to use and set up. I bought a 2 tuner card for it so I can record 2 shows simultaneously. Even more useful is the integration with Amazon UnBox and Video On Demand. It just works. Makes trips to the video store extraneous. I haven't tried Netflix as I want simple on demand outside of my cable box. This machine is set up in the living room, and is hooked up to a 37 inch panel. I bought the overpriced remote for Media Center and that works well too (although the kids keep losing it) Overall, I'm happy with the quality, and plan on upgrading to Windows 7 at some point, but really don't have a need as it simply works well now.

    Now, cue the MS Haters and mod me down. I know, I know... I'm stupid and don't know what I'm talking about.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  11. sageTV by kaplong! · · Score: 1

    I like SageTV ( http://www.sagetv.com/ ), especially the one-click commercial skipping; it has (had?) its occasional hiccups, but this might also be a function of how much one fiddles with the hardware/software setup :-) It seems pretty mature (it's at v6.x by now), has an active user/contributor base, and handles multiple receivers and set top/converter boxes with IR control nicely. It has a free trial.

  12. dividing my HTPC by funnyguy · · Score: 1

    I'm currently in the process of dividing my HTPC frontend into 3 parts. Instead of settling on Mythfrontend alone, I'm going to run Boxee, XBMC (supports myth:// URLs), and mythfrontend. Since mythbackend is reliable, I want to keep it to record my OTA shows and cable shows. But adding Boxee and XBMC to the HTPC frontend will give me support for Netflix and Hulu, better DVD support, etc. I've been and HTPC user for 5+ years, and no one solution is perfect or ever has been. I'm hoping the multi-program frontend solution will work best.

  13. Windows Media Center by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

    Out of all the ones I've tried, Media Center ended up being the best fit for me. Others might have some more features, but Media Center had all the ones I cared about and most of the time implemented them better. The only problem I've run into is that their TV listings updater causes an ungodly amount of disk I/O and CPU usage for several minutes whenever it runs.

  14. Windows MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the same boat as you, I even contributed to an open source solution. The one that just works out of the box is MCE. Its not extendable, but it is completely solid (at least on Vista and I assume Windows 7). Setup only takes a couple of minutes, and then everything just works. It misses the nerd factor of installing all sorts of half completed plugins and configuring for hours, but it was much better for my sanity.

    1. Re:Windows MCE by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      It is extendable, and pretty easy to configure/hack it to launch other fullscreen apps, like the Hulu player or Boxee. Personally I don't like the organization of the Windows Vista/7 MCE for video files, I prefered the folder/directory navigation in MCE 2005. The music library is actually better in the Vista/7 versions though.

      As for television recording, I've pretty much broken down and use my provider's DVR, since I like having the extra HD channels and have them work. It really sucks compared to MCE's recording/management abilities. I ran MCE 2005 for my TV recording for around 2 years or so, and just jumped off in 2008. Lately I use Boxee more than anything.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  15. haven't found one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've looked, tried alot of different dvr software with a high end pc attached to my tv... i have never been that impressed.

    in my opinion i think the directv hddvrs are the best things out there. software that's made for a specific device just always seems to be better

  16. TiVo for the win? by powerlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Original Questioner asks " So my questions to you: What DVR software do you use? Are you happy with it? What don't you like? Are there any packages out there that 'just work' as media hubs and for time-shifting cable TV?"

    I realize that the TITLE says "PC based DVR software" and the questioner certainly mentions only that, but they don't mention commercial solutions at all, so I'll throw in my answer:

    TiVo

    I have a Series3 that I bought with a lifetime contract ~2 years ago. I do not pay a monthly fee, and as of now, I am "saving" that cost (the lifetime contract covers ~ 2 - 2.5 years of monthly service fees).

    - It has two built in tuners.
    - It integrates with most IR remotes.
    - It can be controlled via IP (there are free remotes for iPhone/IPod and other devices to control it, etc.)
    - TiVo maintains a web site where you can log in and tell your DVR to record something.
    - Any Internet enabled TiVo (Series3, TiVoHD, TiVoHD-XL) can also hook into AmazonVideo, Netflix and Blockbuster accounts.

    - It also passes "the wife" test.

    Outside of initial setup (when we were on cable TV and I had to get TWC to come out and put CableCards in the thing), the ONLY maintenance I've had to do is reset its listings when we decided to drop cable completely and switch to using an Over-The-Air antenna, and changing the batteries in the remote.

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    1. Re:TiVo for the win? by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      - It also passes "the wife" test.

      Forgot you were on slashdot, huh?

    2. Re:TiVo for the win? by jimbogun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm in the Tivo boat on this one. It's just easier. I spent so much time setting up MythTv (I've done it on PCs, laptops, and even an xbox) and maintaining it was always a pain. I finally got fed up enough and bought a Tivo. Since then, I haven't had any complaints, except as he said, resetting listings when you switch providers. I've really enjoyed the Tivo suggestions feature as well. I was tempted to get the lifetime contract, but instead I'm willing to pay ~$100/year for someone to maintain my DVR for me.

    3. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not to mention why is someone using a PC to watch DVDs, especially if there's problems? Upconverting DVD players can be had for $50 now. They're approaching "free in your breakfast cereal" levels.

    4. Re:TiVo for the win? by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm on the TiVo boat as well. If you want to serve up media from a PC, throw pyTiVo on it, and point it at whatever directory contains your video files. The format of the video files doesn't even matter -- on the back-end it uses ffmpeg to do the video conversion.

      I have a refurbished Compaq with a 2.4Ghz Core2Duo I bought last year, and it can convert at about 200fps, easily saturating the TiVo's network capabilities. Once setup, the system just appears in the Now Playing List. It has easily passed the wife test in my home over and over again (especially as she has access to the movies directory over the network from the desktop of her Mac -- if she gets something she'd like to put up, she knows to just drag and drop it into the folder, and then start playing it from the NPL on the TiVo).

      Yaz.

    5. Re:TiVo for the win? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Until Tivo supports my cable provider of choice (DirecTV) in HD, it's not really an option. I am not alone in this.

      All those dishies on the rooftops means that Tivo is effectively locked out of that household.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:TiVo for the win? by Etherized · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. If what you want is a solution that simply works, this is clearly the best choice.

      There are a few use cases for the media PC that TiVo can't fill or can't fill very well (transcoding files for use on portable devices, local network streaming, playing media from certain web sites, etc), but you have to ask yourself 1) how much those matter to you and 2) whether another appliance (like the WDTV deals) might do some of it instead.

      I love MythTV, warts and all, but its UI is clunky and its care and feeding can be a hassle. I really can't recommend it to anybody who wants something that just works and just works well. Perhaps the Windows offerings are superior, but I'm personally not interested in running Windows, and I enjoy tinkering, so MythTV works for me.

    7. Re:TiVo for the win? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but are they any good?

      My (admittedly cheap) stereo reciever has one of those upscaling DVD players in it.

      IT'S CRAP!

      I get MUCH better results from my software based video player.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:TiVo for the win? by jimbogun · · Score: 1

      I have a Tivo series 2 working fine with my DirectTV provider. While it's not as good as cable (can only record one show at a time), it's good enough for my needs.

      DirectTV is supposed to be working on something with Tivo to provide a DVR service. See this link for more info:

      http://www.tivo.com/dvr-products/tivo-partners/tivo-directv/index.html

    9. Re:TiVo for the win? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      He did not say that it was *his* wife.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    10. Re:TiVo for the win? by dmorel · · Score: 2

      Agreed. For what the OP is asking for, any of the HD flavored tivo's is ideal. Coupled with pytivo you can throw pretty much anything you ever have at it, and when it comes to the best DVR, tivo wins hands down. There simply is NO (reasonable) argument (that I can think of) to be made disputing that fact. The tivo UI/UX (despite whatever issues one may have with it) is just better than every other option out there. I've fooled around with everything under the sun starting with the first xbox based xbmc builds up to a win7 MCE HTPC. Fun to mess around with, not fun to rely on long term and add in the WAF and it's over. I use my tivo's for everything and stopped futzing around with all these other "projects" Unless of course you get your television from a satellite based provider then... I got nothin'

    11. Re:TiVo for the win? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I was tempted to get the lifetime contract, but instead I'm willing to pay ~$100/year for someone to maintain my DVR for me.

      I don't understand what you mean here. There is currently(*) no difference to the end user between someone paying monthly, and someone paying for a lifetime subscription on a particular Tivo. If you purposely want to spend more to have Tivo making more money, fine. But other than that, I don't understand why you'd purposely pay more than you have to.

      (*) You could come up with theories that in the future there was some new function that wasn't covered by the existing lifetime subscriptions, but I think that would cause an uproar. (I personally would pay a one time fee to have a lot of features *improved*, even if they behave as designed now. But other than that, even as a huge fan of Tivos, I personally always get lifetime subscriptions, since they increase resale value, and they let me calculate my total upfront cost.)

    12. Re:TiVo for the win? by markdavis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last time I tried pyTiVo with my TiVO HD, the results were far from stellar. I do store many of my DVD's as 1Mb/s 264 + AC3 AVI files and it just didn't seem to like it. It down-res'ed them horribly and the resulting video was poor. Plus, I believe it trashes the AC3, resulting in just stereo (yuck) sound.

      Now, it has been at least a year since I messed with it (and gave up on it). If you think it has improved, I will give it another shot.

      Not having decent local streaming of video files has been my #2 complaint with TiVo (#1 being that we can't easily backup the damn settings to a USB key or something so if the unit dies we can recover many hours of work done with preferences, season passes, stations, etc). Otherwise, the TiVo HD is *extremely* impressive and I highly recommend it... it runs circles around any cable provider's DVR or "software" solution I have seen.

    13. Re:TiVo for the win? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      As you know, DirecTV is not a cable provider. They are beyond paranoid and proprietary (like all satellite companies- and probably with good reason, though).

      Aside, it is inexcusable that the FCC has not been more forceful in guaranteeing consumers have the right to choose the end equipment they want; not just cable but with satellite also. Oh well :(

    14. Re:TiVo for the win? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pretty much this.

      PC-based software has come a long way but it's never caught up to the "it just freakin' works" factor of Tivo.

    15. Re:TiVo for the win? by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      TiVo also has a PC based solution (LiquidTV) now through a partnership with Nero. Check it out...

    16. Re:TiVo for the win? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      One advantage of using a Series 2 with DirectTV (or a Cable Box), is that you can use TiVo2Go to transfer any of the recordings made from the TiVo to a computer.

      With a Series3 w/CableCards, you're at the mercy of the CableCompany to not Flag any and all content (besides what they MUST provide in the clear), as not allowed to be transferred.

      This was another reason dropping cable and switching to Over-The-Air was more enticing. All the content I record can be backed up, transcoded to a portable format (PSP, iTunes, Etc.), watched on a computer, or just burned to DVD.

      Not up to the "open source" standard, but on the whole, pretty functional.

      The "downside" of a Series 2 is no HD quality. SD quality only.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    17. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until Tivo supports my cable provider of choice (DirecTV) in HD, it's not really an option. I am not alone in this.

      TiVo and DirecTV recently signed a new agreement. Right now its vaporware, but rumor is the upcoming new TiVo hardware is going to be a new DirecTV satellite Tivo box.

    18. Re:TiVo for the win? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      The only reason I can think of NOT to spend the money up front on a Lifetime subscription, is if you believe the unit will need to be replaced (without warrantee coverage), before the "break even point" (which I mention again is ~2 to 2.5 years).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    19. Re:TiVo for the win? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      transcoding files for use on portable devices

      Not sure how TiVo fails on that. I use the Windows TiVo desktop client to transcode shows for my portable (PSP), and my wife's iPod (direct import into iTunes).

      It's not perfect, and if I remember right there was a one time 5-15$ fee for this function (TiVo Desktop Plus) to cover the codec patents (boo hiss, but not TiVo's fault for not wanting to risk lawsuit), but it works pretty well, including being able to set up automatic download, transcode.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    20. Re:TiVo for the win? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Now, it has been at least a year since I messed with it (and gave up on it). If you think it has improved, I will give it another shot.

      Well, I should admit that I'm still running a TiVo Series 2 in our home. The Series 3 isn't available here in Canada, the HD providers don't like to play well with others (because they don't have to here...grrr...), and we're still running a SD TV. So you could very well be right concerning HD output.

      That said, IIRC pyTiVo does have settings for specifying the output resolution. I also found that a custom-build ffmpeg, built from the latest sources and enabling the various non-free A/V codecs my distro typically leaves out made a big difference (it turned out to be more efficient too, as I could compile it to use threads to saturate both cores on the server machine). My biggest concern wouldn't be so much that pyTiVo couldn't handle the HD video and AC3 audio, but that at 100Mbps you couldn't stream it fast enough to get really good HD quality. And AFAIK all TiVos max out at 100Mbps Ethernet (I'm running gigabit ethernet in my home, and the server has a very nice dedicated gigabit controller in it which, along with gigabit routers between the two makes the transfers somewhat more efficient, but you can't push the data faster than the TiVo will accept it).

      It may be worth another shot, but because I'm one generation of TiVo behind you, I don't want to appear to be making blanket statements which I can't substantiate (which I unintentionally did. And am now correcting :) ).

      Yaz.

    21. Re:TiVo for the win? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I realize that.. Also, you probably already know this, but the *most likely* thing to go bad on a Tivo is the hard drive, and that can be easily replaced. (Of course that voids one's warranty, but unless it's DOA, it's going to go bad long after the warranty's already expired.) Also, unless the drive has completely gone kaput, while its in its death throes, one can recover the existing programs on the hard drive while replacing it with a (usually bigger) hard drive.

      My response was questioning what the person I replied to meant though, since he seemed to purposely be making a distinction between a lifetime subscription and paying to 'maintain' a Tivo.

    22. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>- It also passes "the wife" test.

      You sure you're not talking about MythTV?

    23. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Tivo wins. I'm in same boat. Bought TivoHD with lifetime. Cheaper in the long run. (My original Tivo is also still in use > 9 years.)

      Netflix, youtube, Amazon on Demand work great.
      PyTivo on a mac delivers all my other media.
      (Can be copied to Tivo or streamed.)

      Canceled cable, as OTA HD is better quality.
      The few series I miss from cable were available from Amazon on Demand at much lower net cost.

      Spent a long time futzing with various MythTV and Media Center solutions than never "just worked."

      Setting a recording remotely using iPhone app is a snap.

    24. Re:TiVo for the win? by dialsoft · · Score: 1

      I love Tivo. There is no better. Super reliable andmeets all my needs, I network all my boxes and can record 4 channels simultaneously all while copying programs from one dvr to another. It also can play things on my pc on the tivo. Best investment I ever made.

    25. Re:TiVo for the win? by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      I would agree, but here in NZ Tivo have done a deal with Telecom so you can only get the online content if you use telecoms Xtra service for ADSL broadband. If you use cable through Telstra or some other naked DSL service, sorry, no access.

    26. Re:TiVo for the win? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The only catch with TIVO that makes it a dud, is you can't do anything else with it. You can turn it into a file server, a mail server, even an answering service, all while still being a media centre and running FOSS software you can do the lot for less than the price of a TIVO. I also typically prefer twin DVD drives and it is really important to be able to shift the content from DVDs to large hdisk drives for a lazier media jukebox.

      The big reason for a FOSS only solution, I'm not interested in paying fix upgrades, I don't want to get stuck with corporate forced rule changes, I want it to be secure and I only ever stream free and then buy it, if it is good enough for local storage. I want to set it and forget it for a decade and not have to deal with corporate ass hat marketing executives and the latest how can we scam and monetize the customers with what ever privacy invasive or nickel and dimeing scheme they can come up with this time. Definitely no M$ solutions, somehow the reality always falls far short of the marketing hype, especially on forums and they're always changing the rules.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re:TiVo for the win? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...it's also strictly SD or downscaled HD.

      If it is a standard Tivo, you will also have to deal with the same IR blaster nonsense that any PC based solution will.

      If it isn't a standard Tivo then it will be effectively unsupported as a Tivo.

      My HD DirectTV solutions has been running for 6 months already.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:TiVo for the win? by danpritts · · Score: 1

      100Mbit is plenty fast enough to transfer hi-def streams; it's not the limiting factor. In practice the total a/v bitrate i'm transcoding to is usually less than 10Mbit.

      but as i mentioned above, *something* isn't fast enough and the tivo doesn't keep up. You can have the tivo save it and watch it later though.

    29. Re:TiVo for the win? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My wife and I have been looking at ditching cable too and going Over-The-Air (or at least DirecTV which is cheaper than Time Warner Cable). If you go OTA, do you need a converter box? We have two standard definition TVs and have no plans to upgrade to HD until one of the TVs die. (Yes, I know HD is better quality, but when funds are limited SD can be good enough.) If we would need a converter box, how much are they? Are there any you recommend? Is there any other equipment needed (besides the TiVo, of course)?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    30. Re:TiVo for the win? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >My biggest concern wouldn't be so much that pyTiVo couldn't handle the HD video and AC3 audio, but that at 100Mbps you couldn't stream it fast enough to get really good HD quality

      In my case, I was not even trying to stream HD, just SD from my DVD's. The picture was just very poor once transcoded from 264 to whatever limited bitrate and codec that TiVo understood (can't recall at this moment). I might have been doing something wrong (or maybe just the way I stored it made it worse), but I seem to remember the lack of AC3 was the real deal killer for me. Plus, with a very large, digital, HD TV, my tolerance for reduction of the starting DVD quality is probably pretty low.

      It probably *is* past time for me to look at it again. I will add it to my long "to-do" list.

    31. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 100Mbit is plenty fast enough to transfer hi-def streams; it's not the limiting factor.

      It IS a limiting factor, because it depends on your resolution and compression.

      A single 1920x1080p frame takes about 6.2MB, assuming 24 bits per pixel. At 30 FPS, that's a whopping 186MBps = 1.39Gbps!

      Of course, you can compress this down to a 10-20MBb stream, and it will be good enough for most purposes. Your 100Mbit connection will carry a compressed HD stream, but how much detail are you losing? What's the point of high-def if you give up half the detail or more? This is why I haven't shelled out for an HDTV yet.

    32. Re:TiVo for the win? by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

      Very important consideration is the amount of power your DVR will draw. A Tivo HD uses 34 watts. Most PCs (especially considering the Tivo HD sells for $250) will use more than that.

      So you need to factor power savings in when you price a Tivo.

      Also, there are virtually no HD solutions on computers. HD is wonderful.

    33. Re:TiVo for the win? by jimbogun · · Score: 1

      Sorry I wasn't clear on this one. It's what happens when you rush to respond. I should have said that I didn't buy the Lifetime subscription because of the large up-front cost and I believe I could only get it with the TiVo Series 3 (I may be wrong on this) which wouldn't work with satellite.

      I should have said, I don't mind paying $100/year for someone to maintain my DVR, vice me having to maintain my MythTV server, which I spent many hours doing with much frustration.

    34. Re:TiVo for the win? by hazydave · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's something of a good thing, the FCC itself not being more forceful here. The problem is, many of these things are on the very edge of where the FCC ought to be involved. Satellite slots themselves are a limited public resource after a fashion, and these were auctioned in the usual way. The satellite downlink, though, isn't really traditional "public airwaves" that the FCC is supposed to regulate. Cable is further still... proprietary cabling over existing cable runs... also not really a limited public resource.

      The cable open access stuff is a good thing, don't get me wrong (despite how poorly implemented), but this needs to be through Congress. Once you start letting the FCC mess with these for one reason, it's easy to imagine they'll step in to put on the same kind of content regulations you get OTA... no good will come of that.

      I would also like to see more consumer protections here.. when a company is allowed to service a town, they should be forced to provide same-cost service to everyone in town. The way things are today, they cherry pick the areas they service. Thus, you get some areas with multiple services in competition (cable, FiOS, DSL, etc), and others with no services at all. The actual agreements vary by town, and unfortunately, the local lawyers are usually bumpkins in places coverage actually matters, versus the slick corporate lawyers. So access remains problematic in rural areas.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    35. Re:TiVo for the win? by hazydave · · Score: 1

      The IR-blaster-or-not depends largely on the STB you're trying to control. You can interface standard TiVos to the serial control port of cable/satellite receivers that support them (at one point anyway, DirecTV models usually did, Dish Network didn't, though it's possible to hack... the serial signal is the same thing you get via IR once you filter out the IR modulation carrier, and on Dish models, the UHF carrier as well... very easy to hack, albeit a pain in the butt to have to do).

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    36. Re:TiVo for the win? by hazydave · · Score: 1

      For TiVo, sure. On the satellite, though, they charge about $7.00 a month for "lease", and another for "programming access" (of course, you get the EPG on a normal sat box anyway). However, on Dish anyway, they waive one of these fees if you keep the STB on a phone line (which allows you to make impulse buys of PPV stuff, rather than having to dial in). If the unit fails, they replace it or upgrade it for no additional charge (in theory, anyway). So that's $84 a year for someone else to maintain the DVR for me.

      With that said, I've had my model 1 TiVo since the later 1990s, with lifetime subscription. It's still going... the HDD failed once, but I got a many-time-larger replacement from Weaknees, preformatted and relatively cheap. The TiVo hardware is pretty reliable. Of course, if it finally failed, I would replace it with some kind of media PC, more than likely.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    37. Re:TiVo for the win? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      The TiVo remote has a very rounded design - less chance of tearing a hole and deflating her.

    38. Re:TiVo for the win? by Van+Halen · · Score: 1

      The key to using pyTiVo with DVD rips is to simply extract the original MPEG-2 stream from the DVD without transcoding at all. pyTiVo will then send it to the TiVo (at least TiVo HD, probably Series 3 as well) as-is, and the result is exactly what you'd see (and hear) if you had popped the DVD into a DVD player.

      On the Mac, I use RipIt to rip the DVD, followed by DVDRemasterPro to extract the main title as a single vob. Often this is enough, and the vob will transfer and play directly on the TiVo. Sometimes a pass through MPEGStreamClip is also necessary to clean up timestamps.

      MacTheRipper is sometimes good on old titles that don't have all the new fair-use prevention measures - it can extract a single title from a DVD in a single step instead of the multi-step process above. But it doesn't handle about 90% of newer DVDs.

      This works on probably 95% of the DVDs I've tried. Of the remaining handful, a manual pass through ffmpeg (using the "copy" pseudo-codecs) fixed a couple, but a few still are problematic for the TiVo's MPEG-2 decoder.

    39. Re:TiVo for the win? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      I wonder where they are in their product cycle, since that might make buying the lifetime contract less of a good deal. I bought my parents a Series 2 TiVo a few years back and added the lifetime contract. They've gotten a lot of good use out of it, and it was definitely worth the money (though it would have been MORE worth the money if they actually gave the rebate they advertised). But if you switch from one TiVo to another the lifetime contract follows the TiVo, so AFAIK there's no option to upgrade to Series 3 without paying for service again. So if they are going to kick out a Series 4 TiVo with new features anytime soon, it's probably worth waiting.

    40. Re:TiVo for the win? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      If you've got Series2 TiVos, then you'll need Digital Converter boxes that the TiVo's will control, the same way they do the cable boxes right now. They run ~$40 each (you'll probably want one for each television).
      Before I jumped shipped we had already switched to a Series3 and an HDTV, so I'm not sure which models are recommended. Try looking/asking here: http://www.tivocommunity.com/.

      Things to keep in mind:
      If you replace one of the TiVos with a Series3, TiVoHD or TiVoHD-XL they come with built-in Dual Tuners and can output to SD also.
      The Series3 models are also the ones that support NetFlix, BlockBuster, and AmazonVideo.

      I would recommend looking into a HTPC that can be plugged into the TV to support Internet Video. I commented on some of the things here:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1464648&cid=30306402 (linked rather than reprinting).

      In a nutshell, I'd suggest to look at something that can run Zinc (or something like it) (if you are going to want to go down the road of using Over-The-Internet Video to supplement Over-The-Air).

      Another alternative I didn't mention in that posting was that a PS3 would make a decent "companion device".
      Out of the box it plays DVDs and Blu-Ray (I know you don't care, about the HD, but its nice to know it isn't going to go obsolete). Sony also their own video store that carries a lot of shows "timely" (similar to iTunes and AmazonVideo).
      Add in something like PlayOn running on a Networked Windows PC and you've got the NetFlix and Hulu content running on your TV.

      If you've already got a PS3, XBox360 or Wii, you can download a two week trial of it and give it a whirl to see if it might work.

      You can do all of this with an SD TV, you'll probably have more wires, and it will be a more complicated/cumbersome setup, but if you've already got most of the equipment (TVs and TiVos), then its not a terrible road to go down.

      Other things to keep in mind, are that most people I know with CableTV also have CableModems. The cable companies will often charge higher rates if you JUST get the internet connection from them.
      When I dropped Cable, I dropped them for everything and switched to DSL from Verizon. I already had a land line, so it was just a self-install kit, and phone call or two to get it all connected, but its something to keep in mind.

      Verizon had a two week "cancellation" clause, so I didn't cancel my cable, till I'd had the DSL line put in, switched everything over, and had already disconnected from the cable in my house.

      Most of the decisions really come down to personal choices that are based in large part around what you already have.

      If I can help answer any more questions, just track me down at my username@ att and then just add a .net to the end. :)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    41. Re:TiVo for the win? by danpritts · · Score: 1

      I've seen demos of uncompressed HD vs broadcast quality. You're absolutely right about the quality difference, and when i get access to uncompressed HD source material I will want to display it.

      In the meantime, on the planet earth, most of us don't have access to that material and blu-ray and broadcast HD are the best available. Let me tell you, it looks a bunch better than my old SD set (which was a pretty good toshiba).

    42. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...blu-ray and broadcast HD are the best available. Let me tell you, it looks a bunch better than my old SD set (which was a pretty good toshiba).

      Blu-Ray looks pretty good to me, from what I've seen in stores. OTOH watching sports at the local bar on 'HDTV' which has been recompressed to the point that you can't even read the stats at the bottom of the screen leaves me unimpressed.

      Yes, I know that's the fault of the content provider and not the technology. It still sucks ass because I have no control over what they broadcast.

    43. Re:TiVo for the win? by danpritts · · Score: 1

      in bars & other public places, i've frequently seen HDTVs showing standard def content. Usually without the aspect ratio correct. That looks like ass, for sure.

      by comparison, ESPN HD on comcast looks awesome.

    44. Re:TiVo for the win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > in bars & other public places, i've frequently seen HDTVs showing standard def content. Usually without the aspect ratio correct. That looks like ass, for sure.

      I know what upscaled SDTV content looks like, and this was not it.

      This was advertised as "High Definition sports" and it looked like ass because of the provider's decision to recompress. It completely negated the benefits of HD.

    45. Re:TiVo for the win? by danpritts · · Score: 1

      as i mentioned above i normally watch ESPN or ABC for college football.

      the other day i happened to watch an NFL game on CBS. I was surprised how much pixelation they had (it was not unwatchable but it got blocky for a few seconds every few minutes). I'm not sure if it was recompression by comcast or just crappy from cbs to start with, but it was definitely not as good as i'm used to on the other networks.

    46. Re:TiVo for the win? by danpritts · · Score: 1

      very-recent versions of pytivo will extract the longest mpeg2 program from the dvd automatically, if you point it at an unencrypted VIDEO_TS folder.

      supposedly, anyway. I haven't tried it.

  17. Neuros by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    I've been using the Neuros OSD for a couple of years, and while it's kinda slow, it's hard to beat in terms of features/dollar. It's also very small, runs linux, and draws less than 10 watts. They also have a newer one called the LINK.

    Link: Neuros website

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:Neuros by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Does it work with hulu?

    2. Re:Neuros by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      According to this link, Hulu worked as of February 20.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    3. Re:Neuros by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to myself, but to clarify: Hulu works ONLY on the Neuros LINK. Youtube works on both the OSD and the LINK.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  18. Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Windows 7 Media Center, if you have $120 and like not wasting your time.

    1. Re:Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Troll

      Does it support the HD-PVR yet?

      Does it support QAM on the HDHR?

      Otherwise, that would be just wasting some people's time.

      SageTV is a much better suggestion for the Windows centric crowd.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Media Center by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the HD-PVR, but as for QAM using the HDHR, I can say that Windows 7 handles it perfectly.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Media Center by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      Yes and Yes.

    4. Re:Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Troll

      ...and it only took as long as it took for the 0.22 version of MythTV to "go production".

      Sage supported it on the day it was released.

      This is another good example of why you should minimize the amount of Microsoft stuff you run in Windows...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Media Center by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Does it honor the no-copy flag?

      If so, that will make it useless quite soon.

    6. Re:Media Center by Overunderrated · · Score: 1

      I was using MediaPortal for about 2 years, and I agree 100% with the Windows 7 media center suggestion. MediaPortal is good when it works, but you'll probably never get every last thing configured just the way you want. For a first-time user, it could take weeks before you have it to a wife-acceptable usability level. Windows 7 media center works flawless out of the box, got all listings and all channels mapped correctly on my hybrid PVR with zero input from me. Getting this to work on MediaCenter required incredible amounts of manual setup time. I curse myself for the endless hours I spent working with MediaCenter.

    7. Re:Media Center by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      No-copy is *legally* allowed for only PPV events. Even then, you are allowed to 'pause' for 90 minutes.

      If any cable company is using no-copy, then they are violating the laws, and you can get them to fix it.

    8. Re:Media Center by sowth · · Score: 1

      ...until they get the law changed or make the "penalty" so puny, it doesn't matter to them if they do it and get caught.

      However, they may find a way to do it anyway. They didn't get the SSSCA or like laws passed, but Microsoft and Apple's systems are certainly looking more and more like what would have been required.

      Who is to say a law won't be passed once most people think such controls are "normal." Who is to say the companies won't start abusing those controls once they have a stranglehold. Maybe you will no longer be allowed to publish any videos on the internet, or maybe your audience will be limited. Who is to say you will be able to buy hardware which you are allowed to install the software you want or programs you wrote. These are essential freedoms at stake. These are freedom of speech and freedom of property issues.

      If you lock yourself into the Digital Censorship Management mongers, there may be no way out.

  19. It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The nice thing about a completely open and flexible system is that you can route around it's quirks with other tools. The fact that you can just drop in xine or mplayer is one of the key strengths of MythTV and would likely be necessary in any replacement. I've never gotten this fixation and insistence on using only MythTV for anything myth related. It doesn't have to be that way and that's kind of the point.

    Play with MCE and Front Row and see for yourself. The grass may not necessarily be greener.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      He's looking for something that works, not something he needs to tinker with for half an hour in the middle of his movie date.

      I'm sure this is an honest mistake on your part, though. I mean, who would even consider user behavior as bizarre and alien as going on a date?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The terible thing about existing completely open and flexible system is that you have to route around their quirks with other tools.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      [FC]I am Jacks complete lack of tolerance.[/FC]

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      DVD? On date? Just what kind of loser are you?

      OTOH, when it comes to WAF it's hard to beat having her favorite shows ripped available at the touch of a button iTunes style.

      Even a 3 year old can handle MythTV in this capacity.

      Are you as capable as a 3 year old?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except that MCE doesn't play any arbitrary video file.

      Neither does Front Row.

      You are Jacks complete lack of taste.

      Sage probably does much better but it's not what the Lemmings want to push.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Arbitrary video files?

      We are talking about a DVR. It only needs to play back what it recorded.

      If you want to play arbitrary video files, there are plenty of awesome solutions (both open and proprietary) for that, and none of the awesome ones have any DVR functionality.

      [FC]I am Jacks bias detector.[/FC]

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's looking for something that works, not something he needs to tinker with for half an hour in the middle of his movie date.

      DVD on a "movie date"? Wow what kind of cheap fuck are you? I bet you have ALL the ladies running to you! What a joke.

    7. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Wait... you don't see why bringing a girl back to your HOUSE--where you can serve drinks and be intimate--is better than going to a theater crowded with middleschoolers? What kind of loser are you?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      She's at your house and you can't think of anything better to do than TV?

      What are you? 9?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The original complaint was about DVD playback so clearly we are talking about a little more than a clone of an S1 Tivo here.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      What are you, trolling? Or do you really say "hey, come over and we'll fuck?" when asking people out? Have you ever even been on a date?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I was just responding to the lame ass troll that thinks that he will be futzing with media center software during a date.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      So you didn't even read the summary. I see. A little ignorance goes a long way!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by NIMHrat · · Score: 1

      Um, have you not had a relationship before? It has nothing to do with being cheap. It's not out of this world that some nights your significant other (and any normal person, hot date or not) just wants to stay home and have a movie night (aka "date night") and avoid spending money out and about (not cheap, just who always wants to blow money ALL the effin' time) and avoid the crowds. Geezus. It's not THAT foreign of a concept.

    14. Re:It's flexible and that's a problem? by NIMHrat · · Score: 1

      I know a number of girls and guys (myself included) who ended up "hooking up" on DVD date night. Typically the scenario is: home cooked meal or take-out, get snug on the couch during dvd date night, one thing leads to another... rest is history. Don't underestimate the power of DVD date night.

  20. For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm still using MythTV for recording TV, but I'm currently selling off my MythFrontends.

    For viewing I've switched to an LG BD390. Much less hassle, plays everything I've thrown at (including HD streams recorded by the MythBackend) via UPnP and also does NetFlix and YouTube streaming.

    1. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Asus O!Play is also wonderful for this. Runs linux (has an open telnet prompt with no root password...), plays 1080P with all the fancy Dolby codecs and whatnot, streams from Samba and NFS (although I've only played with the Samba). Cheap too, $109 CAD a month ago and probably cheaper now.

    2. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by IpSo_ · · Score: 1

      How well does it actually support MythTV though?

      I imagine its just a "dumb" video stream player that can't skip commercials or modify any of the programming that a regular Myth frontend can do?

      --
      Open Source Time and Attendance, Job Costing a
    3. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      Does it stream NetFlix?

      Network AV streaming devices are a dime a dozen these days. NetFlix is the killer feature of the BD390.

    4. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      As far as modifying during playback...

      It supposedly supports captions with .mkv files.

      At some point I need to write a script to clip commercials from and transcode Myth's recordings into mkvs with subtitles.

      And before anyone asks- no, I'm not remotely concerned about inaccurate results from trusting mythcommflag to catch commercials.

    5. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by machinelou · · Score: 1

      So, basically it's a PS3 without the games and support for codecs that were published after 1992? Sweet!

    6. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      BD390 uses something like 18 watts.

      PS3 uses... substantially more. And don't they have a reputation for dying?

      So let's see... Costs more, less reliable, uses more power, and is produced by a corporation that famous for being evil. Yep, you definitely picked a winner there.

    7. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by AusIV · · Score: 1

      And before anyone asks- no, I'm not remotely concerned about inaccurate results from trusting mythcommflag to catch commercials.

      You're not? I used MythTV for years, and while mythcommflag was probably 90% accurate, that extra 10% could make a substantial difference in the viewing experience. It's not a big deal when you accidentally end up with a commercial in the middle of your show, but it can make a huge difference if it cuts out 30 seconds of your TV show.

    8. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by powerlord · · Score: 1

      BD390 uses something like 18 watts.

      PS3 uses... substantially more. And don't they have a reputation for dying?

      So let's see... Costs more, less reliable, uses more power, and is produced by a corporation that famous for being evil. Yep, you definitely picked a winner there.

      I'd agree with the "uses substantially more power and costs more (although its power usage is WAY down and $300 is MUCH cheaper than it was on launch).

      As for dying regularly and being produced by a corporation "that is[sic] famous for being evil" ... Not to start a flamewar (or take a troll's bait) but I think you're confusing the PS3 with some other game system whose name starts with X ...

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    9. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I would put the accuracy rate at more like 99% on my setup.

      Any time I have suggested an alternate solution without automatic commercial skipping, my "users" have screamed bloody murder.

      It's easy enough to turn off if need be.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you be more specific about this please? I checked the manual over at lg's web site. It definitely doesn't understand NUV files. Are you transcoding your myth files? To what format?

      Thank you. This could really help me out.

    11. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      As for dying regularly and being produced by a corporation "that is[sic] famous for being evil" ... Not to start a flamewar (or take a troll's bait) but I think you're confusing the PS3 with some other game system whose name starts with X ...

      Reputation for dying:
      http://www.google.com/search?q=yellow+ring+of+death

      Evil corporation:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_CD_copy_protection_scandal

      No confusion here.

    12. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      No problem.

      I just record HD (mpg) streams using my HDHomeRun. They play perfectly on the BD390.

      Doesn't help with your .nuv's, though. Sorry. :-(

    13. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      To address the transcoding aspect, it plays lots of formats. MPG as I mentioned already, but also mkv's. I'll eventually be transcoding all of my recordings into mkv's.

    14. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by llamalad · · Score: 1

      TV isn't hugely important to me, if I somehow find that I desperately miss a particular 30 second segment I'm sure I can find it somewhere on the interwebs.

    15. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try minimyth for your frontends? Saved me a lot of hassle..

    16. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by sowth · · Score: 1

      Do they use Linux incompatible hardware so you have to run a crappy, never updated Xandros distro with it? Are the versions of Samba and the kernel old, highly vulnerable ones which are never updated? I got a Eee for last Christmas, and this was the state it was in when the thing was purchased. As far as I can tell, they have never updated it at all.

    17. Re:For viewing? LG BD390 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Well, not yet at least :)

  21. GBPVR by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Informative

    GBPVR works like an appliance should; easily, the first time, and always. You can write your own plug-ins and skins, or download them.

    1. Re:GBPVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. Works great. Easy, reliable. Not the flashiest front end but a solid piece of software.

    2. Re:GBPVR by Maximalist · · Score: 1

      Agreed... GBPVR is a great package, and has a great community of devs.

  22. DVD Recorder with hard drive by syousef · · Score: 1

    I gave up on this and have been using a DVD recorder with a built in hard drive for the last few years. The only hassle is having to program things twice due to lack of built in EPG, but my PVR is now old and I believe there are models that work now with digital EPGs where I live (Australia).

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  23. HD cable box with pvr by kawabago · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to use mythtv but now have upgraded to HD cable box with dual tuner pvr. It is the best option for ease of use. Skipping commercials isn't automatic but otherwise I think it is the best price/simplicity option.

  24. For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Yosho · · Score: 4, Informative

    The MythTV backend for recording TV is great, but the frontend is very rough around the edges, even after years of development. As a general media center, XBMC is fantastic; its support for playing DVDs, video files, and music is the best I've found on Linux. There's also a plugin for XBMC that gives it functionality as a MythTV frontend, and while it doesn't have quite the same range of capabilities as the official MythTV frontend, it nonetheless works well.

    Unfortunately, there's no way you're going to be streaming Netflix movies in Linux, due to Netflix's DRM. The only way to do it is with a Windows box or using an embedded solution. I use an Xbox 360 for that.

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    1. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some TVs have it built in now, too. The LG 42LH50 specifically. Mine is en route!

    2. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree NetFlix on my XBox 360 is a great experience!

    3. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there's no way you're going to be streaming Netflix movies in Linux, due to Netflix's DRM. The only way to do it is with a Windows box or using an embedded solution. I use an Xbox 360 for that.

      Then why is there an official NetFlix Plugin for Mythbuntu?

    4. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This only adds stuff to your queue.

    5. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by 7213 · · Score: 1

      I'd modify your recommendation, if he can get around his sound issues. I'm permanently hopefully & permanently disappointed in XBMC's support for MythTV. I don't think I'll find XBMC to be a viable Myth frontend until that fateful future day when the PVR branch gets merged into the XBMC trunk & a good solid Myth plugin is made available for it. I will say the commercial skip feature in the 9.11 Beta is nice, but streaming is still flaky, no real guide feature to be had & library integration doesn't work. Seems even for the PVR branch the devs prefer different back end software then Myth (tvheadend? or pvr? or something). Don't get me wrong, I'm realy a huge XBMC fanboy, but a good myth frontend it isn't (yet).

      What I'd recommend, and what I use myself, is a mythbuntu box with XBMC & Hulu desktop. I use XBMC for everything that isn't recorded from TV or Hulu streams. I use mythfrontend for what it does well, watch live TV & recorded programs. Generally I manage my recordings from mythweb, as I really don't like the myth interface at all! I have all three of the players configured to use the same LIRC remote, and have an infinite loop shell script cycle through 'em (a hack I know).

      No netflix though, this is a failure of netflix not Linux.

      Works very well for me, ymmv.

    6. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Raptor851 · · Score: 1

      MythTV back end, MythTV front end for me, the front end is made a world better by disabling the internal player and using custom player scripts set up through the admin interface.

    7. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by Turtle+Master · · Score: 2, Informative

      I run a stripped-down WindowsXP instance in a virtualbox VM on my mythtv box, just for streaming netflix. It works great. I just run it full screen on a separate workspace, and switch back and forth with ctrl-alt-left/right.

    8. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I have that same TV actually, except it's annoying not being able to fully browse from the TV (only lists videos on your instant queue), the quality is higher than I get on my PC.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    9. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have to echo this, especially since my TV habits have moved away from watching most of the crap I taped off TV and instead watching stuff I've ripped from my DVD's.

      Been using Myth since 2002/2003 so I'm no novice (still using the same DB I had in late 2004 - certainly been fun keeping that in sync with upgrades!) and it's a really nice recording platform once you've spent a year or two of hair loss exploring it's foibles. But the frontend is poor; very little in the way of swish or eye candy... yet still painfully slow. Both those aspects have improved massively with 0.22, but the XBMC frontend is bling on toast. And the default skin, PM3, is much nicer than anything I've run into for Myth (flashy bit minimalist at the same time, YMMV), you don't even need a decent graphics card - my bedroom unit runs off an Intel G31 and drives a 1920x1200 screen, and even 1080p H.264 isn't a problem.

      But BY FAR the biggest clincher for me was the automated movie/TV lookups in XBMC. I have about 900 movies and 3000 or so TV episodes, and if you want metadata lookups in MythTV be prepared to spend an eternity bringing up a sub-menu and searching for metadata (after adding the series and episode numbers manually which it somehow can't figure out automatically). In XBMC you add a movie or TV show, and every time it starts (or is triggered manually) it'll walk down your tree and pick up metadata, including pretty pictures, automatically from themoviedb or thetvdb (or any of the other grabbers you'd like to use). This alone saved me DAYS importing collections; the only caveats are that a) I had to write a custom regexp for XBMC to recognise my filename convention and b) it sometimes picks the wrong film/show, but that's easy enough to fix manually.

      XBMC's biggest failing in my book is remote support. There's built in stuff, but if you have a non-standard remote you need to write your own config files (yes, multiple files) - and to me this was one of the most counter-intuitive and badly documented procedures I've ever done in my history with computers. Thankfully most of the rest of the doco for XBMC is much clearer, and IMHO much more informative than similar stuff for Myth.

      XBMC getting ported to Linux was the best thing that happened to my media centre. Faster than mythfrontend and, to me and my techie and non-techie flatmates, much more intuitive in use - even setting up 5.1 over SPDIF was a snap compared to Myth.

      I'd recommend anyone looking into a good PVR mashup on Linux to investigate mythbackend + XBMC as a possible combo.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    10. Re:For Linux, MythTV backend and XBMC frontend. by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      Whatever solution you choose, including xmbc, make sure you use a wiimote as a controller. It's mad cool.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMIHRZK1Lrk

      --

      Liberty.

  25. most STB's are linux the best would be TiVo by johnjones · · Score: 1

    most Set Top Box manufacturers actually use linux so I would choose one that can be controlled via firewire unless your going to get a TiVO see http://tivohme.sourceforge.net/

    again MythTV depends on the hardware that you use so I would say get some better supported hardware or buy something that they have done the integration for you

    regards

    John Jones

  26. GBPVR on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Awesome free PVR software. Supports lots of hardware tuner cards & remotes. Streams over LAN & Internet. Web interface for streaming & managing recordings. XMLTV listings. Excellent support forum. High WAF. Plugins (Game Emulators, Weather, Movie Listings, etc). Comskip, Comclean, Transcode, ISO playback, features go on and on.

    Highly recommended by an HTPC enthusiast.

  27. Windows 7 and Media Browser by Laoping · · Score: 4, Informative

    In years past I've used XBMC on the Xbox and Linux, then more recently Boxee and MediaPortal. I started wanting something that just worked, and was a bit easier to setup. I really like many of the Linux media programs, but they do take a bit of maintenance. So when the RC of Windows 7 came out I figured I'd give it a go. Once I found Media Browser (www.mediabrowser.tv), I was sold.

    So reasons I think Windows 7 is the way to go.

    1. Media Browser - Fantastic plug-in for media center. Almost as good as XMBC in it's prettiness and useability. Very impressive to show off to your friends and high Wife Acceptance Factor.
    2. Easy - It took me about a week of fiddling after work to get it setup the way I wanted.. and I had no issues getting DTS HD or pass-through audio to work. Very easy to get hardware accelerated video to work with ATI. If you use windows 7, check out the antipack, gets your hardware accelerated video working fast, along with all your audio. (http://babgvant.com/blogs/andyvt/archive/2009/08/02/antipack-get-your-videos-working-without-destroying-your-pc.aspx)
    3. Cheap Video card - I bought a Radeon 4350 off of Newegg, with passive cooling. Does 1080p video with 1 - 5% cpu usage.
    4. NetFlix , Media Center has a NetFlix plugin, no HD video, yet.
    5. Easy TV - Has a nice TV Guide, easy to make it work right. I do not have a cable card tuner for it yet, but Ati has on you can get off of ebay, and new models are coming out next year. Cable card tuner would eliminate your ir blaster issue. In the mean time there are a few MS Media Center remotes that come with ir blasters. Also TV shows go right into Media Browser.

    As this is slashdot I bet I will get spammed for saying so, but IMHO it is the best all around system out there right now.

  28. MYTV + Xbox - XMBC by bmsleight · · Score: 1

    Simple Mytv backend and cheap Xboxes running XBMC. Works really well - look at it now. Multiple front-end all around the house for £25.

  29. XBMC by jackjumper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lifehacker likes XBMC (http://lifehacker.com/5105649/hive-five-winner-for-best-media-center-application-xbmc). I use an Apple TV running XBMC and Boxee, which works pretty well, but is kind of slow. I'm planning on picking up one of these (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883103234&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-_-Desktop+PC-_-Acer+America-_-83103234) to replace the apple tv. Not sure what I'm going to run on it yet. I hear the Windows 7 media center is pretty nice, actually

    1. Re:XBMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use XBMC for playback of media-files - it supports all formats and can play from rar-files, which is working awesome. For watching and recording dvbc-tv I use dvbviewer (awesome). Im using ghostevent for my mce-remote-events - so I can change from xbmc to dvbviewer and the other way (at the sametime ghostevent makes it possible to program the mce-buttons for both xbmc and dvbviewer). I have it all running on a standard winxp install. Im very happy with it and believe its the best way to run a mediacenter.

    2. Re:XBMC by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Are they giving credit on the text-only affiliate links? I read that you needed to include images (not sure how they'd know).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:XBMC by jackjumper · · Score: 1

      Were those affiliate links? I copied them out of other sites. They certainly weren't for me.

    4. Re:XBMC by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, C8Junction is CommissionJunction, NewEgg's affiliate partner. Ah, well, maybe you earned somebody else 3 cents. :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  30. Another satisfied SageTV user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using SageTV for more than a year. Very feature rich, supports the server on Windows, Mac, or Linux, and has a large user customization base. I'm using their HD Theater media extenders with the server software running on an old Pentium 4 out in the garage fitted with an Over The Air HD recording card. With MediaMall's PlayOn running on my main PC, I have Netflix streaming, Comedy Central, and lots of other online steaming content. I've kissed cable TV goodbye (but the recording cards still support it if you need it).

  31. XBMC or WDTV or Boxee by halfdan+the+black · · Score: 1
    What about XBox media center, I heard a lot of good things about it, but not much discussion here, what do others think of XBMC.

    Also heard a lot of good things about Boxee, any thoughts.

    I myself am planning on getting a WDTV some time soon, nice small, compact, does not need a computer. And runs Linux, and is totally hackable.

    1. Re:XBMC or WDTV or Boxee by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      XBMC is amazing, but it doesn't offer any built-in DVR functionality. What I've found worked alright was having a MythTV backend server running on something with ample storage, then using the MythTV plugin for XBMC for the front-end(s). It worked well for watching recorded TV, but severely lacked in the watching live TV arena. This was around 3 or so years ago when I had this configuration last setup and working, so things may have changed there but from what I've read it hasn't really.

      The reason I'm not running this configuration now is because of HD TV. Maybe in the future when the cable companies offer CableCard technology that doesn't suck, I may get back around to getting the MythTV + XBMC setup back up and running, but until then I'm just gonna use the DVR from the cable company.

    2. Re:XBMC or WDTV or Boxee by ichthus · · Score: 1

      I've been using XBMC 9.11 beta 1 for a little over a week, and I absolutely love it. I built a cheap HTPC with no hard drive -- I boot from an SD card in about 30 seconds, but usually just suspend and resume.

      It doesn't have DVR capability, but I have decided to rely on torrents. Torrents are better for a number of reasons, the main one being the fact that networks don't always start and end their shows at the scheduled time. In this day and age, that's ridiculous. (Some may question the legality of torrenting TV shows, but I would argue that they're analogous to having a friend record a show to VHS and then pass it onto me.)

      Anyway, XMBC is awesome. I'm looking forward to the 9.11 release, but the current beta has been very stable.

      --
      sig: sauer
    3. Re:XBMC or WDTV or Boxee by Monolith1 · · Score: 1

      What about XBox media center

      It may not suit your desired config, but I love the combination of XBMC on my old original xbox networked to my main PC which does all the heavy lifting (downloading and recording) to shares the xbox can access across my LAN. I run an old original xbox I got off ebay in the loungeroom hooked up to my 42" Panasonic 1280 plasma via the component cable and it looks absolutely fantastic at 720p. The xbox is patched into my LAN, then in my office, I have my main PC which is always on, and I have setup a share on it where I put all my divx files (I use altbinz rss feeds straight into custom folders). I bought a cheap TV tuner card (Winfast pxDVR3200HBDA - onboard hardware mpeg - approx $100AUS) for my main pc and I just record shows straight to a share which I can access from the xbox in the lounge. The provided winfast software is pretty clunky but it handles my scheduled recordings fine. The setup works a treat for me, the library mode keeps track of watched shows, and the wife can drive XBMC easily via the standard xbox remote. NB: The standard original xbox cannot play MKV or other highdef content. If I record on my tuner card in the office at full high def, the files are too jerky to play in the lounge room. So I just record at standard digital def and play and they look fine. Realistically, I hardly watch much live TV. Its mainly for the kids afternoon shows. The only reason I would build a dedicated standalone PVR box is if standard resolution divx content started to dry up, and I needed a more powerful platform to play highdef content. I am running Windows 7 64 ultimate and I did try the built in media centre, It is very nice, but the recording format is an issue. I could convert them back to a format xbmc could handle but I got sick of it and just went back to recording standard winfast mpgs again.

    4. Re:XBMC or WDTV or Boxee by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's a pretty good interface for a Jukebox type system with web video support and it has very good support for all sorts of (alien) formats. The key problem for XBMC for this discussion is the fact that it is not at all a PVR. Although it's pretty easy to launch it from MythTV.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:XBMC or WDTV or Boxee by dissy · · Score: 1

      (Some may question the legality of torrenting TV shows, but I would argue that they're analogous to having a friend record a show to VHS and then pass it onto me.)

      Sadly both of those are equally illegal in the USA :/

      That is not to say I disagree with you on the rest of your post, and yes I too don't feel either of those things should be illegal, and do not blame you one bit.

  32. GBPVR with Event Ghost by Cidolfas · · Score: 1

    For a year or two, I used GBPVR on windows which was very good for me. It doesn't do everything - no built-in netflix support - but nothing that couldn't be mitigated by using other programs alongside it. It is a very stable TV-recording backend. It should work with your IR blaster, too.

    Even Ghost does very good at letting you control remote control input (basically, you can capture remote input and assign macros to it, including keyboard input) on windows, except for MCE remotes in 7 due to how 7 hijacks MCE remote input.

    As for me, I migrated the other way when Mythbuntu 9.10 came out with MythTv 0.22

    There's just too much I like about the idea of having a single box on 24/7, web accessible, do all my media, web, and computational server needs. I got HDMI audio working, and that was that. It's been running pretty well for me so far, though I haven't run into DVD problems yet. Throw in linux's hulu desktop and I have everything I need.

    Netfix for linux would be awesome though.

    --
    I am become /dev/null, destroyer of data.
  33. Mythbuntu plus by ericrost · · Score: 1

    I run mythbuntu with a boxee launch item in the main menu. Mythbuntu works flawlessly for capturing media and playing it back, boxee does everything else flawlessly. FTW!

    1. Re:Mythbuntu plus by norminator · · Score: 1

      I was doing that for a while, but Hulu's insistence on blocking boxee got annoying, and that was the only thing I was really using boxee for. Now that Hulu has its own linux client, I call that up from the Myth menu instead. It's technically against the terms of service to use the Hulu Desktop software on any type of appliance like that, but I don't lose sleep over it.

    2. Re:Mythbuntu plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. The Mythbuntu team has done a great job of packaging things together to work much better than a plain install of MythTV would. And the support they provide via forums and IRC is fantastic.

      Boxee I'm still hesitant on. I still have many issues with the whole app locking up if I leave it running longer than a day or two. Still doesn't play some DVDs and I have to restort to Xine exactly like the OP. I'm hoping the Beta released this month improves things more. It's a great idea that I hope continues growing.

    3. Re:Mythbuntu plus by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Really? Ok, now time to install that and get it in the menu. I still like other features on boxee (way better local media support oustide of dvd isos) but I share your pain on the clunkiness of hulu on boxee.

    4. Re:Mythbuntu plus by norminator · · Score: 1

      It's true that boxee deals with non-recorded TV shows much better than MythVideo does, but I don't use that functionality that often, and Myth Video does it just well enough that the convenience of not having to launch a separate program, login, then navigate through a few pages to select a movie is worth it.

      One thing about the Hulu Desktop solution... it is set up to be able to deal with a remote (using lirc in linux), but it aims for Apple Remote simplicity (the only functions available are the ones on an Apple remote), so the remote functionality is pretty basic, and it's implemented in kind of a confusing way. Also, for some reason it always starts auto-playing some recent episode of shows I never watch as soon as the program starts, and that program keeps playing in the corner of the screen as you browse for something you actually do want to watch. You can pause it, but it's still there. I guess they're trying to make it be like the TV experience, which is weird, since they specifically forbid you from using it on a dedicated TV appliance.

    5. Re:Mythbuntu plus by ericrost · · Score: 1

      The biggest draw for boxee for me is the auto recognition and metadata download (MythVideo completely lacks this) I also use a lot of the third party plugins for random web video sources plugged into my htpc fairly nicely. Having a properly functioning hulu app will be nice, though, even if it has to be a standalone.

  34. Sound dropping out and elusive PVRs by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    Since upgrading to new hardware, I've had issues with sound dropping out; these problems only occur for Myth, not for anything else.

    Hallelujah! From the lack of responses to my post about this issue on the Mythbuntu forums, I thought I might be the only one experiencing this problem. No one has stepped forward to either acknowledge this problem or offer a fix, which is very frustrating: I've been using MythTV for several years, and was only recently forced to reinstall everything after my HD died. I've resisted the siren call of TiVO up to this point, and Windows is out of the question.

    I've seem some PVRs at Fry's that claim to record to a HD. Are these not a viable option? They seem to come and go: Fry's had a Phillips PVR just a couple of months ago, but now I see it's no longer even listed in their online catalog. Is there some reason why HD-based PVRs appear to be so elusive?

    1. Re:Sound dropping out and elusive PVRs by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I've got an LG DVR that works fantastically for my purposes. It records TV, let me watch just about anything, including .AVI files encoded with DivX. (Home movies, of course.) It'll even play directly off a thumb drive or other USB storage mechanism. Favorite movies can be copied to the hard drive, and children as young as 5 can be taught how to turn on "Cars" or "Enchanted" and watch them. (The first is a home-made documentary on the manufacturing of internal-combustion vehicles, the second was a PBS special about wizards in the dark ages.) A 250G HDD can hold somewhere in the neighbourhood of 250 similarly-encoded movies, although that would leave no space for taping.

      The remote even has a TV section that was able to control my TV within about 30 seconds of reading the manual. Not all functions, but enough so that I can turn on the TV, switch to the DVR, and start the movie with just one remote.

      It was $300 and replaced the Daytek I'd had for years. The Daytek died after about 3 years of service, but since I bought it from Costco they gave me my money back. (I got the LG from Costco with the cash they gave me from the Daytek.)

      The only issue I have had was with recording some shows -- there's a broadcast flag on some shows that won't let you record. In that case, I've heard that some people would download the torrent and watch it via the thumb drive. Those people apparently don't have to watch any of the commercials. The sound quality isn't as good as I would like it to be, but it's tolerable. Also, unlike the Daytek, you can't watch off the HDD while recording. (This was an undocumented feature in the Daytek.)

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:Sound dropping out and elusive PVRs by Cidolfas · · Score: 1

      Did you check the [mythtv-users] mailing list? I though I've seen lots of discussion on that issue there.

      http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/

      --
      I am become /dev/null, destroyer of data.
    3. Re:Sound dropping out and elusive PVRs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PVRs are scarce because TiVo sues them out of existence.

  35. Combo package by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a combo, Windows MCE 2005 (XP basically) for recording Austar (satallite pay tv), WebschedulerDVB for free to aid digital channels and record both to MSDVR format, use crunchie to convert to mpeg4 .AVI files on the Windows Home Server I have, and XBMC on the main tv computer and every other pc for playback anywhere in the house

  36. Boxee - Not a DVR, but still awesome by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

    I use Boxee for playback. It's been very reliable for me on multiple flavors of Ubuntu. I realize it doesn't have true DVR capability, but your complaints seemed to be more to do with the playback portion of your experience and, using Boxee, I've had no problems playing back pretty much anything (though, for some reason, I can't get youtube to work). It also automatically indexes your media file collections (assuming you're following some standard media naming conventions, i.e. Lie.to.me.S01E01.avi) so you can easily view your entire collection and quickly pick out the show (or film, or music) you want to watch.

    --
    Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
  37. Recording HD? by rlp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While we're on the topic - is there a good solution for recording HD from cable? I'm currently using analog cable with a Hauppauge card to record programs in standard definition. Potential solutions:

    1) DVR from cable company. Problems: I've gotten anecdotal information that these DVR's have poorly designed UI's and tend to be somewhat flaky (worse than Windows). Also, they are a closed system, I can't move the recording to a mobile device for portable viewing.
    2) PC + HD ATSC / Clear-QAM tuner card - this gives me the ability to record over the air broadcasts and cable channels that support Clear-QAM (which is a fairly small subset of cable channels).
    3) PC + HD Tuner Card + Cable Card - does anyone make one of these? Anyone have any experience with this?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Recording HD? by norminator · · Score: 1

      There are companies that offer Number 3, but I think they're all pretty expensive as they tend to tailor to the high-end custom markets, although supposedly it's possible to get your own CableCard tuner without going through an OEM now. Probably still expensive, and it will probably never work with anything outside of Windows Media Center, but it is a possibility.

    2. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hauppauge HD-PVR will record HD (1080i, 720p, 480p) via component video. So You can record whatever your cable box puts out. It is supported in MythTv.

    3. Re:Recording HD? by alan92rttt · · Score: 1

      ATSC looks good but its locals only so thats a limitation. Clear QAM looks good but its a crap shoot as to what your Cable CO will provide and they don't support it. I can't speak for all cable Co DVR's but the SA 8300 from WOW has a UI that belings int eh 80's with DOS. While it works it is a step down from the PC SageTV interface I had gotten used to. I will be dumping it after the 1st of the year getting two Hauppague HD-PVR's and 2 Basic HD receivers.

    4. Re:Recording HD? by rlp · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat wary of this: "IR Blaster to change the TV channels in your set top box". Seems like a bit of a hack.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    5. Re:Recording HD? by SEAL · · Score: 1

      1) DVR from cable company. Problems: I've gotten anecdotal information that these DVR's have poorly designed UI's and tend to be somewhat flaky (worse than Windows). Also, they are a closed system, I can't move the recording to a mobile device for portable viewing.

      At least in my experience with Comcast DVRs, yes they are flaky, the interface is poor, the fast forwarding sucks, and it has had problems with just magically losing all recordings twice in the two years I used it.

      2) PC + HD ATSC / Clear-QAM tuner card - this gives me the ability to record over the air broadcasts and cable channels that support Clear-QAM (which is a fairly small subset of cable channels).

      Works well, although I'd recommend something like the HDHomerun (dual clear-QAM tuner box that plugs into your home network). At least where I am, I get pretty much everything on basic cable in 480p, and then the OTA channels plus a few others in either 720p or 1080i.

      Beware that Comcast likes to leave their QAM frequencies undocumented and likes to map them to different channels periodically. So if you're using MythTV you'll want some familiarity with the database, particularly the channels and dtv_multiplex tables. That said, with the switchover to digital, I no longer have the ability to record analog cable and you may find the same problem in upcoming months. In particular, in my area, Comcast switched QAM frequencies last month (again) and is now using some of the area formerly allocated to analog.

      3) PC + HD Tuner Card + Cable Card - does anyone make one of these? Anyone have any experience with this?

      Tivo is your easiest solution. Windows Media Center will support a CableCard but with some tweaking required (good writeup here: http://hd.engadget.com/2009/05/12/how-to-install-a-cablecard-tuner-in-your-diy-media-center/)

      I don't know of a way to get MythTV working with a cable card and it seems rather unlikely because it is a hardware / vendor lock-in.

    6. Re:Recording HD? by mpapet · · Score: 1

      #2 is what I do using Mythtv.

      #3 will only work in Windows, but only work poorly, as Microsoft's DRM prevents them from fully functioning.

      http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2006/11/8300.ars

      http://www.geektonic.com/2009/05/cablecard-tuner-hack-for-diy-vista-and.html

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    7. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, the only company which is making a pc card with cablecard capability is Ceton Corp.
      Check this out: http://www.cetoncorp.com/ProductsWMC.php
      Apparently one card will be able to tune in to six HD channels simultaneously. From the website:

      The Ceton Multi-Channel Cable TV Card enables Media Center PCs to play or record up to six live channels of HDTV at once and stream live HD channels or recordings to multiple HDTVs throughout the home, all from a single cable connection. With Ceton you finally have a solution to transform your Media Center PC into a complete entertainment platform for all your media - even encrypted cable TV - with terabytes of storage.

      Cablelabs ageed to give them cablecard functionality, giving your pc access to digital cable tv. It's supposed to be available Q1 of 2010. I have a feeling the Media Center PC will finally take off with the introduction of this piece of hardware. It's been a long-time coming.

    8. Re:Recording HD? by northernboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't tell if anyone in a low-modded comment suggested this, but how about the Hauppauge HD-PVR? http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hdpvr.html Have yet to buy one, mainly because I don't think the machine I'm using is fast enough to keep up, but it looks like it should work until component video connectors go away.

    9. Re:Recording HD? by SEAL · · Score: 1

      You can get an HDFury2 (converts HDMI to component) and then you're back in business, even if the component outputs on your cable box go away.

    10. Re:Recording HD? by Fastball · · Score: 1

      I've done it successfully before, but it required a custom built version of LIRC and some hacking at shell scripts. Not impossible or difficult, but even with a MythTV installation, I just wanted a straightforward setup without the additional STB profaning my TV cabinet.

      Hence, I gave up on HD from the cable company save for the Clear-QAM channels recorded with my HDHomerun. We get all of the major broadcast networks and several PBS stations, and that seems to gratify my wife and me. Everything else is standard definition. Not gorgeoous but cheap and malleable from an end-user standpoint.

      Digital cable is a no go until we can plug the cable into the device of my choice (w/ assistance from a CableCard if necessary) and peruse as we see fit. Simplicity trumps value, AV quality, and all other incentives to upgrade for us.

    11. Re:Recording HD? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      1) Yeah, the cable company DVRs can suck. Hard. Or work great. Depends on what hardware and software they're using. I about threw a Cox DVR through their window because I was so insulted by their only DVR offering. Damn thing stuttered if I tried to watch one HD program while recording another. I never bothered trying to record two HD shows while watching one. The thing only held about 12 hours of HD content anyway. Not even enough to get through Sunday Football. And it would regularly lose its guide data. Call tech support: Please unplug the box, wait 30 seconds, then plug it back in. It should download new program data. Well, yeah, that worked but what about the 2 or 3 days it was sitting there brain-dead, not recording my shows?

      2) ClearQAM depends on the cable company. Last one I had did most of their material that way with maybe a dozen of the less popular channels on SDV. One thing you can count on is that you'll get the networks in the clear. They're required to deliver those (ABC/FOX/NBC/CBS/etc.) that way.

      3) I've only seen one Cable Card setup for a computer and it was part of a dedicated "Media PC" package. Wasn't the kind of thing you could run down to Fry's and buy. And you'd probably be locked into using whatever certified DVR software was provided with the kit. Cable Card devices have to be certified and are usually locked down single-purpose devices like televisions and Tivos.

    12. Re:Recording HD? by VoltageX · · Score: 1

      There was a product called Fury-something that could pass the output from HDMI to other outputs, which may be one step towards what you want to do.

      --
      "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
    13. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use SageTV with an HDHomerun and 1 HD-PVR.
      The HDHomerun has a dual tuner that picks up the clear QAM channels. Not a lot but all the network stuff.
      The HD-PVR is hooked up to the comcast cablebox via component and optical. I have it recording 720p with digital audio.
      SageTV takes a little tweaking but support is good. The HD-PVR is not as reliable as the HDHomerun but it's okay and the quality seems good.

    14. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used the ATi Digital Cable Tuner with Vista Media Center (that you have to buy through an OEM like Dell or HP). It's great except that stupid CableCARD standard requires egregious DRM on every recorded TV file, preventing me from removing commercials or streaming over Orb.com. I also prefer subscribing to DirecTV instead of Comcast.

      Because of the DRM, I switched to using a Hauppauge HD-PVR with DVBLink feeding it to Windows 7 Media Center. It's terribly slow at changing channels, since it has to dump the previous feed and start transcoding the next...so all the lag of transcoding is compounded with every channel change. I'm trying to set up the guide now so I can watch SD channels over SVideo through a regular tuner card, and my HD channels through the HDPVR/DVBLink.

    15. Re:Recording HD? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Uh, that's how TiVo works (unless you have a CableCard model), and yet no one calls that a hack.

      Incidentally, I have a dual-tuner setup capping from a pair of low-end DSTBs driven with blasters, and it works great.

    16. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the firewire stream off of the cable company's set top box, but my cable provider seems to be one of the few that isn't overzealous with the "copy once" flag.

      Hauppauge's HD-PVR (Component -> mp4) also works well.

    17. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hauppauge HD-DVR will record component HD output from any device - including premium HD channels from any other receiver. Windows7 Media Center supports it and I've read that an IR blaster is included to change channels on a digital cable box or satellite.

      I have a Hauppauge 950Q USB ATSC/ClearQAM recorder. Currently, over 100 channels in ClearQAM are received with about 15 in HD which record nicely. There is an issue. The Hauppauge device needs to be disconnected / reconnected every 2 days or so. Without this reset, nothing gets recorded.

      I have friends that use a Hauppauge 1600 and GB-PVR happily, but I don't know about their HD recording. GB-PVR appears to be an excellent answer, if your tuner is supported.

    18. Re:Recording HD? by afidel · · Score: 1

      You might want to hold off if you are considering Win7 MCE, by the end of Q1 Hauppague and a few other companies will have CableCard compatible tuners that can be used with MCE. Unfortunately WOW is on SA/Cisco head ends and so m-card's are limited by the firmware to 2 channels so the best card by Ceton with 4 tuner's isn't of much value though they say they will be coming out with a 2 tuner 'value' card eventually.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    19. Re:Recording HD? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's the exact same "hack" used by Tivo for their first two generations of devices.

      As much noise as is made about IR Blasters, people seem to forget that this "hack"
      was what allowed PVR technology to get started in the first place. It didn't kill
      Tivo. So the idea that it should be an automatic show stopper is a bit absurd.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:Recording HD? by northernboy · · Score: 1

      My cable provider is Cox, and they are in the process of moving to some kind of switched digital provisioning system, with the consequence that CableCards don't work any more. So to get any non-clear content, one now either needs a DVR or cable box. They evidently have a workaround device for Tivo, but this is not going to help me use my CableCard in my TV.

    21. Re:Recording HD? by alan92rttt · · Score: 1

      I've checked out MCE with the copy of vista I have and did not like it. From what I've seen the W7 MCE is better but W7/a Ceton card will cost me more then 2 HD-PVR's that I can use in my existing SageTV system.

    22. Re:Recording HD? by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      Do most cable boxes output at hd component or only sd component?

      Not only that but $250 seems a bit pricy just to get live premium channels to mythtv in HD. There has got to be a better way.

    23. Re:Recording HD? by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      It has been 2+ years now of them saying they will release said card. I gave up waiting.

    24. Re:Recording HD? by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      HDFury

      The idea of capturing VGA at 1080p sounds nearly impossible or extremely pricey.

    25. Re:Recording HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      currently I am using using Beyond TV the server is running on a hp laptop with a broken screen, that happens to have e-sata and hdmi (lucky for me) and enough hd space, I also have a computer in every room in the house for watching tv, 3 large screen tv's. I am also using 2 networked tuners, which each one has 2x tuners supporting qam for digital cable. getting everything to work properly has been some work.

    26. Re:Recording HD? by hazydave · · Score: 1

      4) Capture via HD analog component. That's pretty easy these days.. something like the Blackmagic Intensity Pro is a PCIe 1x card, which can capture analog or HDMI (which would be useless, if your cable company is doing HDCP) in realtime. These run $200, but of course, you'll have to so something with the video on capture. H.264 is going to be a realtime thing, but a fast PC could do MJPEG or Cineform in realtime, if not MPEG-2, more than likely. If they're also downrezzing your analog, then you're SOL with this approach.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  38. There are 3 prime-time PVR's on Windows by TomXP411 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sage TV, Beyond TV, and Media Center are all mature products that work well on Windows.

    Media Center is very "Microsoft-y", and it's not as configurable as the others. The upside is that it's seamlessly integrated with Windows, and it passes the WAF test rather well.

    Sage TV is a tinkerer's dream, but I never managed to get it successfully up and running with QAM channels mapped.

    Beyond TV was my favorite for a long time, as it's both configurable and stable. The only problem is that Snapstream has slowed active development of the consumer product. Their prime focus is on developing for the Enterprise market. (Think one server, recording a dozen news channels at once, extracting closed-caption information to create a searchable database.) BTV has one great bonus feature: It can automatically re-compress video down to H.264 and drop the show in to iTunes as a Podcast. This is pretty slick, since it lets you save several TV shows to your iPod or iPhone and take them with with you.

    BTV and Sage can both record HD through the Hauppauge HD-PVR, and all 3 can record ClearQAM content (usually your local TV stations.)

    Windows 7 Media Center will also record encrypted QAM cable with a CableCard, but the CableCard capture devices aren't quite ready for public consumption yet; I believe the ATI box's firmware is still in closed beta, and the Ceton device will hit the market early next year. (The Ceton card will record 4 SD or HD shows at the same time.)

    BTV and Sage can control your cable box with a USB-UIRT or MCE Remote (with an IR blaster). Media Center will only control your box with an MCE remote/blaster. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000W5GK5C/ref=ox_ya_oh_product">Amazon has one for about $40 that works well.</a>

    BTV and Sage both can also stream live video to other PC's on the network. Media Center can only play back pre-recorded video; if you want to watch live TV an another PC, that PC needs a tuner card.

    1. Re:There are 3 prime-time PVR's on Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      From what I've read, BeyondTV has basically stopped being a viable consumer product. They are focusing all their efforts on their commercial product and any upgrades to the consumer product are a by-product.

      Two years ago, I had a TiVo and became interested into a server-based solution that could serve multiple displays. I tried several different products, and SageTV came out the winner.

      + I love the fact that they support media extenders, which means that I have low-powered, low-complexity devices at each TV instead of a "real" computer.
      + All my media (recorded TV, music, photos, video) is accessible via the same interface on each display.
      + SageTV provides a software media extender called Placeshifter which you can run from any computer that provides the same interface. Your server does the transcoding.
      + The cost of the software is relatively cheap at $80.
      + While the default interface is not that user-friendly, there is a customer-created interface, SageMC, which is a lot better.
      + The community is very active and people on the forums are very helpful.
      + There are many customer created add-ons.
      + You can view Netflix and Amazon (and a few other services) via Playon.
      + Overall, I've found the software to be quite stable.
      + The software will support as many tuners as your system has resources, SD, HD, QAM.

      - The company isn't very open about their roadmap. There's little communication with them except through email support.
      - Add-ons are pretty "hacky" to install and update. The people that create the add-ons don't place a premium on documentation.
      - The forums are a bit scattered. People tend to glom any possible post about a topic into any thread that even marginally pertains to their needs. So there are many threads with 40, 75, 100 posts. It can be hard to find information.

    2. Re:There are 3 prime-time PVR's on Windows by matthelm007 · · Score: 1

      Missed points I've caught so far on SageTV: SageTV runs on Windows, Linux or Mac. I currently have 4 QAM (1 HDHomerun and 1 HVR-2250, with 2 tuners each) tuners on my system, and they work fine. The HDHR is MUCH easier to set up than the 2250. My currently system has 5 tuners: HDHR, 2250, and a WinTV-HD PVR. Never had a bit of trouble, other then when I mess with it. Been using SageTV for about 5 years, and I'm currently supporting 3 recording systems (mine, my dad's (he's 76) and my cousins) SageTV can also record ATSC (over the air HD) SageTV (on a Windoze box) and it's extender will play almost any file format you can throw at it. It's being continuously updated, and if you have a problem that is in there software (not driver or system) you get a direct connection to the devs. About the only problem I've heard, is that sending them a file (like a section of a HD file) can sometimes be a pain, but that's mainly the lack of file editors, and email limits! Oh, and they have a great and active forums group, that can help with the little bumps.

    3. Re:There are 3 prime-time PVR's on Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have been using Beyond TV for about 1 year. The software is very stable. I have 2 ATI TV Wonder 650 tuners which occasionally flake and require reboot in order to recover. This is despite being plugged into a UPS. Hardware is a Dell Optiplex 740 (small chasis "cash register). Am using the Firefly RF remote. In general we are quite satisfied. This is with SD analog cable (Charter) and a Samsung 48" LCD HD TV. HD content is only from separate Blu-Ray player and is not through BTV.

  39. Read a fucking book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slacker.

  40. I was planning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on using Myth TV myself. had the spare PC, found a nice dual tuner tv card. Then i found out that no drivers had been written at the time. Then when i did find drivers, it was only for the digital half of the card which was useless to me. I just wanted to be able to record tv with little or no hassle, without having to buy a Tivo, etc. Looks like it'll be some windows for me.

    1. Re:I was planning... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      IOW, you didn't bother to actually make sure that your device was supported beforehand. That's not to say that there aren't plenty of suitable devices.

      It's like you're mad at Elgato for there being no Mac driver for the HD-PVR.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  41. Playstation 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe not the answer you're looking for as I guess you want to keep using the hardware, but if you don't mind dropping the extra cash, the PS3 a brilliant media player.
    Obviously does the disk based media that you'd expect, supports DLNA, you can stream NetFlix and there's the PSN store if you want to buy/rent stuff.
    Couldn't be happier with it, personally.

  42. Roku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not keep you current MythTV and just add a Roku box? For $100, it is cheaper than any new computer hardware and it does Netflix and many other services.

  43. The mess in the Media/Audio/Video Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth is that ferocious trade wars, copyrights, protectionist tendencies of media giants, bloody competition, violent fight against file sharing, deafness for user's wishes, putting lawyers ahead of marketing ahead of creatives, lack of basic intelligence, absence of convergence, fear to change a business model that clearly is not working anymore for a time have left a devastated, broken and fragmented situation in the market.

    Many in ./ know how many things can be relatively simply done at home with today's technology, as much as many know how the lack of convergence of technologies, compatibility and all the stupid crippling or complication of many functionalities because of DRM for example make life just frustrating hard, leaving much to improvised home-made combination of half-working devices sold by computer shops and never the definite solution (a la 'VHS recorder' for example).

    Now we got to get crazy amongst wireless and wired, dvd, blu ray, DRM, DLNA, billions different looking media players, zillions media formats totally incompatible with anything in one day time and never all together supported on all devices, thesuperclosed HDMI standard for which some jackass, deserving jail, really, asks costly royalties and the list could go on forever.

        Salvation looks not in sight... Whatever DVR solution you will find today, it will inevitably be crippled, broken, limited and not working with new formats of tomorrow..... Good luck my friends :-)

  44. Consoles by tciny · · Score: 1

    Why isn't anyone mentioning the consoles? Both the 360 and PS3 offer Netflix streaming... The PS3 is a rather capable media player overall... DVD/BluRay, MPEG via DLNA, Netflix, PSN video store, recognises external USB storage so you can play your movies off it etc.

    1. Re:Consoles by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because neither one records live tv?
      Or lets you run your own apps?

    2. Re:Consoles by tciny · · Score: 1

      That very much depends on where you live. Over here in Europe all you need is PlayTV (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayTV) to record live TV and do all the usual stuff you'd expect from a DVR. True, it doesn't let you run your own applications, but then again I'm struggling to come up with anything I'd want to run on a media centre other than - well - media players.

    3. Re:Consoles by sexconker · · Score: 1

      PS3 lets you run Linux (though there's no official install method for the new slim model).

      PS3 lets you fucking print for shit's sake.

    4. Re:Consoles by h4rr4r · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      emulators, for one

    5. Re:Consoles by frozen_kangaroo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I use an old, practically scrap, Pentium 4 hidden away in the loft running Mythbackend with tuners and big hard drives in it. It sits there and records programs. It uses a Fedora 9 distro, and dependency hell was dealt with smoothly by running yum.

      Under the main television that we watch is a PS3, which sees the backend as a UPnP media server without any fuss. All recorded programs show up under the "video" menu. Any machine in the house can also be used as a frontend, if Mythfrontend is installed. Mythweb can be used to configure it remotely (even off-site if I'm feeling brave enough to let incoming conections to it from the outside world) so you can log in and set something to record if you are out and about.

      I'm really happy with the system and not got any particular moans, other than the fact that tuners don't just work out of the box and forums have to be read ...

    6. Re:Consoles by gabebear · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about trying this... but I also wanted to record in MPEG4. Last time I tried that I couldn't get it to work unless I only recorded in MPEG2.

      What codec are you using? Are you only using ATSC/QAM, or analog tuners?

    7. Re:Consoles by SileNceR_RH · · Score: 1

      Err... You haven't heard about PlayTV then? This is out in Australia so I assume the rest of the world has had it for some time? PS3 can record live TV no problems with these units.

    8. Re:Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With PlayTV, a PS3 can record TV.

      http://uk.playstation.com/ps3/hardware/accessories/detail/item102429/PlayTV%E2%84%A2/

  45. EyeTV for Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely. Best. Ever.

  46. Windows 7 Media Center, Hands Down by il1019 · · Score: 0

    I've searched like you. For a long time I used GB-PVR, and while it's great, it isn't as pretty and flashy. Very functional with the right plugins, and if you like tinkering, it's awesome. I recently moved to Windows 7 Media Center. I am a sorta open source kind of guy, but wow. I am totally blown away by 7 Media Center. I've been setting up boxes for everyone I know and they are loving them. Give it a try, I bet you'll be surprised, especially as a DVR. It just rocks. And when (if) CableCards get popular, you will be able to use it.

  47. MacMini and Re:EyeTV by rovitotv · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have a Mac Mini setup with FrontRow, iTunes, and EyeTV hooked to a 37" flat panel. It all works really well with the $19.99 Apple Remote Control and Sofa Control software. This setup passes the Wife test and even my 4 year old can use it. Playing DVD's is super easy with FrontRow. The computer looks attractive because of it's small size and sleek design. The Mac Mini setup will save you time with setup and family support issues.

    1. Re:MacMini and Re:EyeTV by gannett · · Score: 1

      And the bridge between EyeTV and media player Front Row is "PyeTv" a plugin for Front Row that lets you drive EyeTv using the remote and a more sofa appropriate gui.

      It's a good combo for me. There are a lot of offerings in this space now but IMHO you do have to put in some research to find what works for you + Wife.

      Gannett

    2. Re:MacMini and Re:EyeTV by jj_mcnally · · Score: 1

      I, too, have EyeTV on a Mac Mini, connected to a 40" LCD. With a digital audio out cable, it can even play 5.1 surround through my AV receiver! Here are some more EyeTV features I like: - auto program guide updates from TV Guide - exports to a whole bunch of different formats - smart schedules based on multiple criteria - works with my Harmony universal remote - imports from VHS (with Elgato EyeTV 250 Plus) - frequent software updates I highly recommend it.

  48. Popcorn Hour? by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

    I'm currently a Tivo Series 3 user (Works awesome and basically zero maintenance, other than the monthly fee and a very occasional spontaneous reboot--???!!!)
    --That said, I've been keeping an eye on the Popcorn hour boxes...http://www.popcornhour.com
    --Looks like it plays all the media you can throw at it, and toss in a blue-ray drive and you can even watch those-
    It supports a Huge laundry list of features, but it looks like the one thing it doesn't actually do is the DVR of actual tv streams... Anyone know of any updates in that area?

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    1. Re:Popcorn Hour? by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      This doesn't play live TV?

      Does it have an advantage over Plex, XBMC, Boxee, ...?

  49. PlayOn or Boxee by Kildjean · · Score: 1
    I used to run Boxee on my Mac and PC at home, until I discovered PlayON.

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxee

    Boxee is a cross-platform freeware media center software with a 10-foot user interface and social networking features designed for the living-room TV. Boxee is a fork of the free and open source XBMC media center software which Boxee uses as an application framework for its GUI and media player core platform, together with some custom and proprietary additions. Marketed as the first ever "Social Media Center", Boxee enables its users to view, rate and recommend content to their friends through many interactive social networking features. The current version is Alpha but works very well. You can register for free on their website. Also the beta version of Boxee will be released for all platforms on December 7th 2009.

    PlayOn Media Server

    PlayOn gets your favorite Internet Videos off your computer screen and onto your TV. Download and try out PlayOn for free for 14 days. All you need is a home networked PC and a DLNA-compatible device — like a PLAYSTATION 3, Xbox 360, or Moxi HD DVR. We've also announced PlayOn for Wii public beta.

    My Notes:

    At home we have two Xbox360's and we stream content to them from PlayOn. From a budget perspective view PlayOn is the way to go if you have consoles at home. PlayOn only costs $39.99 and to configure it its a onetime setup which is pretty straight forward. You can also download free plugins from PlayOn Plugins. At my home we currently we use Netflix, Hulu, Cartoon Network and a bunch others). Once you got your settings configured, you go into your console and in the Video section you will see a "Channel" that looks like "yourPCName:Playon" when you select it you will see all the options you configured to watch. It works as advertised and works very well. I have another 360 that got banned in my bedroom with a 36" LCD and it works great.

    Boxee, I used it for a while, but I never had a PC/Mac dedicated just for that... It is pretty good and there is lots of support... One thing is that Boxee is free.

    I hope this helps!

    Kildjean

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    1. Re:PlayOn or Boxee by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      How does playon compare to Plex/XBMC?

    2. Re:PlayOn or Boxee by Kildjean · · Score: 1

      its different as you only install PlayOn on your computer, and configure it with your accounts to use netflix, youtube, hulu, etc. and you get the content on your tv, through your console. you should try it, it comes with a 14 day trial period.

      --
      Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    3. Re:PlayOn or Boxee by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      Again, how is that different than Plex/XBMC? That is exactly what plex does.

  50. Myth is great ... as backend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Tivo Series 3 with an additional external HD, which is great. Netflix, Amazon, all integrate well. Like others who have posted, I have a Myth box which I rarely use as a frontend to capture video to either:

    - watch on PC at my desk or on PC outputting to big TV or on laptop
    - burn to DVD to watch elsewhere
    - take advantage of its automatic transcoding to watch on my iPod or Blackberry

    It doesn't have the polished front end the TiVo does, but it does the file manipulation I want without having to go through TiVo's Desktop software (slow, not very automated)

  51. What if I don't need recording capability? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for a media jukebox that I can dump all my audio/video content onto. I *never* watch cable TV and have no interest in recording it or watching it with the system. What would be a good solution for this? I'd prefer to stick with something that runs on Ubuntu 'cuz that's what my extra box is currently running.

    1. Re:What if I don't need recording capability? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if you're just "dumping a/v content" then mythtv will work well. It's passable on DVR and downright flaky with DVDs but when it comes to running videos, you're just an apt-get away. (Technically, you don't even need that, just a box that can output to your TV, but mythtv has the advantage of a simplified interface to work with remotes as opposed to keyboard/mouse.)

      XBMC also works well.

    2. Re:What if I don't need recording capability? by andre_pl · · Score: 1

      If you're not intetrested in recording or cable TV, XBMC is BY FAR the better solution.

    3. Re:What if I don't need recording capability? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I always liked XMMS.

  52. I use by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Cyberlink power cinema on WInXP, with Gigabyte USB tuner. Works great.

  53. Tivo Warning by clinko · · Score: 4, Informative

    A HUGE warning about the Tivo:

    Tivo lists show transferring is a big feature but...

    EVERYTHING worth watching on cable is DRM'd. EVERYTHING.

    It bugs me that they advertise this as a feature.

    Blame Time Warner, Cox, Comcast, whoever you want, but the TIVO does not transfer anything but your fox, nbc, and cbs channels.

    Analogy:
    - Ford makes a car that can't drive over speed bumps
    - Ford advertises the car jumping speed bumps
    - After buying the car, Ford tells you to drive on limited roads or YOU can call your local town hall to fix every speed bump in town. Ford has no responsibility, and will not assist in any way.

    Only 2 months left on my contract, and I'm done with this scam.

    1. Re:Tivo Warning by mattack2 · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is true for *some* people on *some* cable companies. It definitely is not true for everyone. (Check TivoCommunity.com threads for replies from people who routinely do this type of transferring, who post replies to people who post Chicken Little kinds of posts like the one I'm responding to. I personally don't transfer much, so I don't have personal experience with it.)

    2. Re:Tivo Warning by powerlord · · Score: 1

      I DID blame TWC.

      I then realized that 90% of what I watched was available:
      1) Over-The-Air. Great reception in a metropolitan city, meant I didn't NEED cable for local channels anymore. Any TiVo that uses CableCards also has a built in HD tuner so you should already be set to go, and as an added bonus, anything you can receive over the air in Digital shouldn't have a copy flag set, and the HD quality will usually be better than cable.

      2) Over-The-Internet Free. No ... I don't mean Bit-Torrent. I mean legitimate sources. Most of the cable shows I wanted to see were "broadcast" on-line via Hulu, or other legitimate web-sites.

      3) Over-The-Internet Paid. Okay, sometimes it isn't always available free. You missed the "free window" (most places only leave the last two-5 episodes on-line), or you MUST watch it as soon as everyone else. iTunes, AmazonVideo, Sony's PSN-Video store, and who knows what other places now routinely have TV shows available the day after broadcast for ~$2-$3 an episode. Considering you can save ~$100 a MONTH by canceling cable, you can still come out ahead.

      4) Season Compilation DVDs. If you ABSOLUTELY must see a show that is available on-line (latest season of Doctor Who being broadcast on BBC America?), and that doesn't have an OTI-Paid option, then you can almost always be sure there will be a Season Compilation DVD out soon.

      The only catch was needing a HTPC to handle the Internet TV part of the equation (perhaps that should be a new "Ask Slashdot"? :) ).

      The best I've found so far is a mac-mini running Zinc (from ZeeVee). It runs on Windows and OSX and is basically a stripped down version of FireFox with some specialized plug-ins.

      Personally its a GREAT interface to all the free internet sources out there, I'd recommend anyone exploring internet content sources to give it a look.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    3. Re:Tivo Warning by nonliteral · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends entirely on your cable company. I have two TivoHDs with cablecards on FIOS, and (thus far, knocking on wood), I've yet to see them mark anything as non-copyable.

    4. Re:Tivo Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two Tivo's... one HD, one a serries 2. One I have to fight the DRM crap (HD), one I use to record. I've told Tivo that the HD has false DRM positives, but they don't listen. (Why can I record on one and not record on the other?) To bad that Tivo won't fix their DRM bugs.

    5. Re:Tivo Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isn't Tivo's doing. Tivo is just doing the bidding of your cable provider. I swear they purposely screw up anything that uses cable cards to push their STB rentals.

      I told cox to shove it and went off air and downlaod only. I couldn't be happier and I can transfer all recordings to any DVR in the house.

    6. Re:Tivo Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You say it is "true" and "Chicken Little". Which is it? Based on your - poor - analysis, it is "true" for some and "Chicken Little" for others. However, the "Chicken Little" concept is incompatible with "true". Hence, learn how to write, fuckface.

    7. Re:Tivo Warning by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Meh, I just don't care about show transferring. If I really want to archive a TV show "permanently", I USE the NET to grab an HD copy in mkv format.

      But how often do you want to archive something that was just on live TV? Usually it's old stuff that I want to see, stuff that wasn't just on TV.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    8. Re:Tivo Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised to hear you say that. I've only ever run into one show that I couldn't transfer. 50% of what I record on the TiVo is either transferred to the Tivo in our living room or to my PC (where I then convert it to play on my phone).

      So the shows that you could otherwise grab via antenna (FlashForward, Grey's Anatomy, House, etc) are definitely transferable as you mention. Shows on USA, Scifi, etc., are almost always transferable (such as Battlestar Galactica, Burn Notice, Psych, Royal Pains). Come to think of it it was a cooking show that I couldn't transfer.

    9. Re:Tivo Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a completely different experience with the TiVo. Only shows downloaded over the Internet get marked for DRM. Premium channels and all others except On-Demand can be downloaded.

      My cable operator, the largest in the USA, hasn't bothered with DRM switches in my area. I'm in a metro area with over 5M people. Further, over 100 channels are available in ClearQAM on my system.

      I love my tivo with lifetime support paid in 2003. I love pulling shows off it and building an entertainment library. I'm sorry it doesn't work that way for you.

    10. Re:Tivo Warning by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      ...Yes, I said Chicken Little, and *you* are apparently too chicken to post with your username.

      "True for some" and "Chicken Little" are not incompatible, if you had adequate reading comprehension.

      The problems *are* true for some (I would say a *minority* if not a *vast minority* of users).. For those who it is true for, they post Chicken Little-like posts, acting like this will affect everyone, when it does not.

      That is exactly what I was pointing out.

    11. Re:Tivo Warning by crtreece · · Score: 1

      Not sure which direction you are talking about moving shows. I have copied multiple shows from my series 2 tivo to my mac in order to strip out the commercials and burn to DVD. I've also copied them to a laptop running XP.

      To do the copy, I've used the Roxio plugin that comes with Toast, and whatever the Tivo provided software is for XP.

      I also used tivodecode for a while.

      I don't remember any issues with any of the 3, especially not being able to copy any shows. I copied shows from food network, hbo, and other non-broadcast networks.

      Most likely none of that applies if you have a series 3 or other HD capable box. If you do, and you are tired of the box, feel free to send it to me ;-)

      --
      file: .signature not found
  54. Client / Server by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

    I ran Windows MCE for several years, first 2005, then Vista. Unfortunately, it would die, or need to be rebooted, whenever the wifes favorite TV show was on. So I looked for something that could do client/server: dedicated box for recording and storing, separate box for viewing. My requirements were:

    1) Client / server
    2) DVD playback on client
    3) Full screen TV-like interface on client
    4) Working TV guide

    The only one that fit the bill was Sage. I've been running it ever since. I'm about to try switching the server from Windows to Linux, so wish me luck :-) They also have an OSX version, so I can watch recorded TV on my macbook.

    Jamie

  55. Beyond TV by tjb627 · · Score: 1

    I have used Snapstream's BeyondTV for years and love it.

    1. Re:Beyond TV by tedgyz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would give a strong thumbs up for BeyondTV (by snapstream). I have used it for several years and have not complaints. If you are looking for a DVR solution, look no further. In your requirements though, you elaborate on wanted a media hub, which IMHO is not a DVR. If you are looking to record and view TV, BeyondTV is awesome and much better than tivo. For one thing, they have smartskip which attempts to mark commercial breaks. It isn't perfect, but when it works it is a godsend.

      More importantly, beyondtv passes the family test. My tech-n00b wife uses it, as well as my kids, including my 6 year old. With BeyondTV link you can also watch from other computers. That's where it really shines. One kid can be watching a show on the main TV while another has a laptop in the bedroom watching a different show.

      You have to pay for the software, but there is no subscription. TV channel updates are reliable and accurate.

      No - I don't work for snapstream - I'm just an extremely happy customer.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  56. Mythbuntu 7.10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got Mythbuntu 7.10 setup perfectly (had to replace some hardware) and I haven't bothered upgrading anything. It just works.

    I have two pcHDTV tuners to get OTA HD, and Schedules Direct updates the TV guide. I have had to upgrade the hard drives however.

  57. MythTV automatic commercial skipping by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    commercial skipping that does not even require a remote button press. That is the killer feature for me with MythTV and why I keep using it. I also have diskless frontends and when I want a new one I can just plug it in and it just works. And then there is the web interface that I can use to program recording shows from anywhere. I agree with other posters with just using xine or another player for playing DVD's and it not being a bad thing. You can send args to xine to surpress the splash screen and everything else and then seamlessly fall back to MythTV when you hit "end" on the remote so I don't see the problem. As for streaming, I got a blue ray player that has netflix streaming (a roku box would work and be cheaper). All of this is controlled with one universal remote. If you want flexiblity you get it with myth. If you constantly tinker and upgrade, you will always be tinkering with myth, but you can also choose to set it up and just use it. From everything I have seen, MythTV's flexibility beats everything else I have tried (to the point where people are using other solutions like xmbc as a part of their MythTV solution).

    1. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      How does it reliably detect the beginning/end of commercials? Sure, there is a video and audio jump at the beginning and end of every commercial, but there is a lot of that in the actual program as well. What if broadcasters get smart and start airing commercials that aren't an integral multiple of 30 seconds in length? I've always thought there was room for a value-added service wherein someone would subscribe to receive commercial start/stop cues over a back channel from someone payed to watch each of the channels. (Now there's a job I would be well-qualified for!)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by mcmoyer · · Score: 1

      Plus the ability to losslessly transcode the shows to remove the commercials. Most 1/2 hour shows go from 3.1G to 2.0G. That adds up if you've got people in your family that love to hoard shows.

    3. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Informative

      It uses a few methods - blank screen detection is one of them ( I think the default), since there are usually a few black frames at the start of a commercial break. Scene change detection is another. You can tweak which methods it uses. In my experience, it gets it right about 85% of time. When it doesn't, the 30-second skip works wonders :-)

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    4. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by PhracturedBlue · · Score: 1

      I love MythTv, and have been using it for years and years, but it is absolutely not easy (though I have more obscure hardware, and have never used mythbuntu). I've also tried being a sysadmin for my friends' myth boxes....I would never wish that on anyone. The stability has always been the biggest issue. Random crashes are extroadinarily annoying. With Firewire, I found recording very unreliable, image quality is very dependant on the capture method. But I haven't seem anything that can support my High-Def recording with auto-commercial detection, and for that,I'm willing to stick with it.

      I've heard that you can run 'Play On!' in a virtual-machine on windows to convert netflix to upnp streams (which can then be watched on Linux). I haven't tried it myself though. Certainly not ideal, but perhaps viable for those certain use models.

      Also Blu-Ray is still really hard in Linux. I've considered a Windows MythTV frontend with a linux backend which might give me the flexibility I want, but I don't think there's a good integrated solution for that.

    5. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Killer feature #2, Playback speed change. By skipping commercials and speeding up the playback speed, I can easily watch two hours of shows in forty minutes. That is awesome!

    6. Re:MythTV automatic commercial skipping by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      I think BeyondTV uses similar techniques. It also succeeds about 85% of the time. For example, it gets commercial breaks spot on for "The Big Bang Theory", but misses the mark every time for Jeopardy! I think it has more to do with the local station and how they do commercial breaks.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  58. GB-PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GB-PVR works great. Runs as a service in windows so it never gets in the way. Also can be setup as a web server so you can view your TV guide remotely, accessible by your PDA phone.

  59. My Suggestion is SageTV by alan92rttt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have two PC based DVR's in the house. I've used several peices of software over the years and Sage TV has been the best. The UI is IMO much easier to use that Win MCE. It has the basic functions(record, play, ff/rw TV) as well as DVD playback, audio, pictures and other Video files. Its audio and video playback is limited to the codecs you have loaded. Native it will search and stream youtube videos. Their are several user created addons to enhance the look and feel as well as functions. Their is a new addon that connects to the playon software that will give you netflix and hulu streams from within sage. The software can be setup in client/server mode so that all of your cable box's and other hardware can be in another room and you just have either a PC or their media extender in the living room. It works well with Hauppague's HD-PVR for HD recording from a cable box via the analog HD component out. www.sagetv.com be sure to check their forums.

  60. HDHomeRun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all unencrypted HD streams, grab an HDHomeRun box by Silicon Dust -- it tunes up to two simultaneous over-the-air ATSC digital channels or cable clear-QAM digital channels at once and spits 'em out over an ethernet port. There are Windows drivers as well as software for Linux or *BSD to integrate it with your PVR (i.e. Media Center, SageTV, etc. on Windows, MythTV, etc. on *nix).

  61. XBMC frontend + MythTV backend by hindumagic · · Score: 1

    I've run a MythTV media center solution for the past 5 years and recently rebuilt it. I found that the backend was great, but all of my issues were with the frontend and getting that to work to my satisfaction.

    My rebuild is based on Gentoo again, but this time with XBMC as the frontend, and it is fantastic - full HiDef (1080p), surround sound setup. Installation was a snap and I had a fully working frontend solution including remote (on Gentoo!) within a day. I'm going to install a MythTV backend on the same box for recording over the air signals, but I'm not in a hurry to do so. My media center is now more focused on DVD viewing/storage and less TV these days. I'm done with cable. ...now if only Linux could easily read BluRay...

  62. Mod Parent Informative by mpapet · · Score: 1

    I had similar issues with Windows Media Center.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  63. Mod parent informative by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Important details!

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  64. TiVo HD by markdavis · · Score: 0

    My solution wasn't software at all. I just went with a TiVo HD. Dual tuner, dual cable card, over-the-air recording, cable recording, HD, SD, Netflix streaming, YouTube, Amazon, season passes, automatic listings, fantastic remote control, remote access, the list goes on and on.

    The fact that it runs Linux is interesting, but doesn't really matter one way or the other. The box just "works" and it works very well. It should certainly be in the list of anyones' comparisons to messing with software solutions... although there is a service fee, it is less than a typical premium channel; and the box is far cheaper than anything one could ever put together on their own.

    Is it perfect? Of course not. I am very picky and have my own list of things that need to be improved or fixed. But when I compare it to anything else out there, it always seems to come out on top, by far.

  65. Corrections? by mpapet · · Score: 1

    What do you mean by 'use' a cable card in Win7?

    Use it like a doorstop maybe, but otherwise you have to buy the Win7 Super Media Version with DRM that comes only on certain models of certain PC brands.

    http://www.geektonic.com/2009/05/cablecard-tuner-hack-for-diy-vista-and.html

    Will I be able to stream the HD recorded to other frontends in my house? Nope. DRM restrictions.

    Nevertheless, I'm interested in subscribing to your newsletter.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Corrections? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have relaxed a lot of the restrictions.
      They only have to meet minimum hardware requirements now.

      http://www.geektonic.com/2009/11/microsoft-mediacenter-cablecard.html

      http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=655

      There is work in SageTV to use Windows Media Center as a "tuner" so Sage can indirectly use these cards. We'll see.
      We'll see.

  66. Mythbuntu & HDMI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well on the subject of MythBuntu & HDMI audio may I just say the following.

    Arrrgghhhhhh !!!!!

    Trying to get it to work is like plaiting fog.

    1. Re:Mythbuntu & HDMI by Cidolfas · · Score: 1

      What's your chipset? I got mine to work on my integrated ATI HD3200 by installing Pulse, setting alsa to use pulse by default (by changing ~/.asoundrc so that pcm.!default { type pulse } and ctl.!default { type pulse } were the options) and then edited /etc/pulse/default.pa so that it forced pulse to load my sound device (which you can find by running aplay -l ) by adding the line "load-module module-alsa-sink device=hw:0,3". That gave me HDMI sound output.

      By default Myth Frontend will disable pulse audio when it starts, but you can disable that in 0.22 by putting the line "export EXPERIMENTALLY_ALLOW_PULSE_AUDIO=1" to ~/.bashrc and starting it from the console (or with careful application of a .sh, start it automatically). Then just make sure that the frontend is set up to change volume using the master instead of pcm.

      There are a few other quirks, like when I run security updates and reboot I have to reselect my HDMI output in the output selector in Ubuntu's default gnome sound panel to change sound from within myth, but since I don't reboot often it isn't much of a hassle for me.

      Is running myth this way a bit complex? Absolutely. But the flexibility of the system is just too much to give up. I consolidated the functions of my media server, web prototyping server, and PVR into a single box that I leave on 24/7. The ability to add new frontends (I have one set up on my laptop) that work seamlessly when I'm on my home network is too good to pass up. Like all things Linux, it takes a bit of looking and a bit of elbow grease to set up, but once it's running it runs great.

      --
      I am become /dev/null, destroyer of data.
  67. Best on Mac: EyeTV; Best on Windows: SnapStream M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best on Mac: EyeTV; Best on Windows: SnapStream Media

    Windows Media Center is notoriously hard to set up TV tuner and IR. If you get it going, God willling, you can stream to other Windows PCs (Vista and even better with Windows 7) or to your TV through an xBox 360. Or just pay for an xBox 260 gold subscription and you'll be able to stream Netflix instant movies and anything on your Media Center PCs or Windows Home Server.

  68. DRM = you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm also increasingly getting pressure from my family to get things like NetFlix streaming working on this machine. This seems to imply migrating to a Windows-based solution.

    Yes, if you give into their pressure for you to adopt DRM, then you're going to be stuck with proprietary solutions, so 90% of the media players out there, won't be options for you.

    Other than that one detail, it sounds like your main problem with with mythfrontend, or maybe even just its internal player. If your backend is local or mounted (nfs or Samba), you ought to be able to use xine or mplayer as an alternative to the internal player. Or give up on mythfrontend completely and check out XBMC and its MythTV plugin script(s). That'll let you keep MythTV as the PVR (which is pretty much unbeatable, anything else is a downgrade) while keeping your player slick and up-to-date with the latest fads.

  69. Just use Usenet + hellanzb + DVD player by adosch · · Score: 1

    I've tried my many attempts at a MythTV HTPC setup and it truly is a lot of work and time. What really got me every time is exactly what the author stated: the many handful hack attempts to get everything to work right. I ended up sufficing back to using my useset + newzbin + hellanzb + hellavcr setup. For mainstream TV recording, it's *always* on Usenet somewhere with-in 40 minutes after showing and the whole point of a DVR is to watch your recorded shows after the fact. Then set up a Samba share (for WIndows) or NFS or use your samba share for your Linux hosts, lock it down and use `mplayer`'s "-cache" parameter and you're golden. I'm on my laptop much of the time anyway, so sitting in bed watching a show becomes pretty effort-less streaming it over the network or hooking my laptop to my LCD dvd (that has VGA-in port). If I want to watch DVDs, I either use `mplayer` again over the network or just burn the dang DVD image, because again... Useset is also useful for that and my newzbin indexing report service + hellafox makes it even easier.

  70. Popcorn hour is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the c-200 and love it. Plays everything great. HD, SD, avi, ISO, mkv, mp3, flac, AVCHD, x265, divx, xvid, etc. etc. I haven't had a vid b0rk it yet.

    Important to upgrade the firmware right away and then YAMJ is a definite need (http://omertron.com/pch/YAMJ_Latest). PCH is good on its own; with YAMJ, it's just awesome.

    -goro-

    1. Re:Popcorn hour is great by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      I have an older A-110 model of the Popcorn hour. It is a pretty good solution for watching downloaded MKV files that other player have trouble with. The interface is nowhere near as nice as XBMC, but it gets the job done. If my old modded XBox would play 1080p mkv's, I'm sure I would still be using that.

      That being said, the popcorn hour firmware has always been a little shaky, so I would not recommend this solution to a non-techie. You need to be prepared for a few hick-up and re-flashing the firmware.

  71. Mythbuntu + Boxee by Ransak · · Score: 1
    I've been using Mythbuntu since the 8.x release and it's been pretty reliable for everything you mentioned. Yes, the integrated DVD player sucks by default, but it's trivial to set up Xine for this. I don't use the default MythTV player for anything other than cable recorded content and my family loves it.

    Integrate Boxee into MythTV and stream Netflix to it and you have a solution that does just about anything (short of Cable Cards) that anyone could want.

    --
    "Powers. I have them."
  72. Windows Media Center by anexkahn · · Score: 1

    As much as I hate to admit it, I use windows media center on Windows 7. I use an xbox in each room as extenders. I run MCE buddy to convert the files to WMV and remove the commercials. With this setup I record my shows, chop out the commercials and make them available in every room. I only have to run one windows computer to make it happen. The xbox supports netflix streaming, but it requires an xbox live subscription, so I only pay for the subscription in one room. I don't play any games on the xbox, I only use it as an extender. I tried several different setups before going with the windows solution, but this has been the easiest and prettiest solution I have done. If you use a homerunhd tuner, your windows media center computer could be a virtual machine....just in case you don't want to dedicate hardware to the task.

    --
    Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
  73. GB-PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use GB PVR (free, not opensource) on a windows xp box with several Hauppauge tuner cards (both analog and digital). It works reasonably well on some old cannibalized motherboard I had lying around and put into a really nice quiet case, plus it streams recorded content on the net with a built in web server. I have a Hauppauge MediaMVP on a wireless bridge to watch standard def in the guest bedroom; in other rooms TV can be on the computer monitor.

    I do have to exit GBPVR to watch Netflix movies using Firefox, but I have reprogrammed the Hauppauge remote (easy) to start up FF and go to netflix. I still find a gyro air mouse indispensable for choosing which Netflix movie from my instant queue however.

  74. Nero LiquidTV by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had TiVos for years and years and years. I have a Series 3 now. I love it.

    But if you want a truly PC based solution, how about Nero LiquidTV? It is basically the official PC version of the TiVo software. It still needs a TiVo subscription, but it has all the features and the same fantastic interface.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  75. XBMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XBMC is pretty awesome. http://xbmc.org

  76. Try GBPVR for Windows by Slayblaze · · Score: 1

    GBPVR is an excellent free Media Center/PVR that has worked wonderfully for me for several years now. I have a PC dedicated strictly to GBPVR and although it does require a bit of setup to get working initially, its nothing a slashdot regular would have any trouble with. Once set up, it runs itself without issue and is very easy to use. http://www.gbpvr.com/

  77. GP-PVR by coldmist · · Score: 1

    I use GP-PVR. It's free. It has a good plugin system with lots of plugins available. Overall, I'm happy with it. It does take some time to get everything set up, but once there, it just works.

    I only use it to watch TV and recorded shows. I don't watch DVDs through it, etc.

    --
    Don't steal. The government hates competition.
  78. "Best" may not be an option by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I'm also increasingly getting pressure from my family to get things like NetFlix streaming working on this machine.

    You need to have a talk with your family about the costs of getting locked into proprietary stuff that is designed to limit interoperability. You can have Netflix or the best PVR (whatever that may be), but it is highly unlikely you will ever have both on the same machine (barring virtualization).

    Think about it: the best PVR would naturally be able to record a Netflix stream's plaintext. (It doesn't matter if this is useful; my point is that the capability would exist.) Netflix isn't going to allow that to happen.

    If the kids demand proprietary streaming that respects DRM, then use a second box. I know people who are very happy with something called "Roku" for this. I don't understand the appeal but I can't deny their satisfied testimony.

    Same for Blu-Ray. If you must have it, use a separate box from your PVR.

    I urge you to resist DRM, but even if you embrace it, don't let DRM constraints on non-PVR content end up limiting your PVR choices. And they will, unless you segregate the functionality.

    Once you do that, then it comes down to whether or not you have DRM on your PVR content (e.g. digital cable TV). If you don't, then MythTV is almost certainly your answer, because like Tron, MythTV fights for the users. If you do have DRMed TV, and really don't want to give it up (i.e. fire your cable company) then give up on using a PC and just get a Tivo. The hassles of DRM in a personal computer aren't worth it; you'll never find any decent platforms that are even DRM-compatible, much less decent PVR apps that can run on those platforms.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  79. plus MediaBrowser by ahbi · · Score: 1

    WMC is "good enough" but you really want something like MediaBrowser is you have a lot of ripped DVDs or saved videos.

    It is currently free and open sourced.
    Although the authors want to move to a pay but open source model, mostly due to the popularity of it and how that eats into their time. They seem a bit slow to move onto that model however.

    MB will automatically pull metadata info from the TVDB and Movie DB (open APIs) for your movies and videos (assuming they are named in a way MB understands).
    Based upon that metadata it'll do genre/studio/release date sorting, and keeps track of your watch & partly-watched videos.
    Has about 3-4 themes (supported by the respective authors) and within those themes a series of views (poster, banner, coverflow, thumbnail, etc.).

    You can also look towards MyMovies but that is really DVD-centric. Although it is a great source for movie metadata.

    1. Re:plus MediaBrowser by initdeep · · Score: 1

      my movies backend is second to none for dvd library and metadata control.

      it is also possible to use it as a backend for almost all of the popular front ends.

  80. direct tv HD tivo is coming in 2010 and there boxe by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Direct TV HD tivo (with mpeg 4) is coming in 2010 and there boxes right now are way better then cable and they have working e-sata as well.

    200 HD next year cable can't beat that.

  81. try MediaBrowser w/ VMC/W7MC by ahbi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    WMC is "good enough" but you really want something like MediaBrowser is you have a lot of ripped DVDs or saved videos.

    It is currently free and open sourced.
    Although the authors want to move to a pay but open source model, mostly due to the popularity of it and how that eats into their time. They seem a bit slow to move onto that model however.

    MB will automatically pull metadata info from the TVDB and Movie DB (open APIs) for your movies and videos (assuming they are named in a way MB understands).
    Based upon that metadata it'll do genre/studio/release date sorting, and keeps track of your watch & partly-watched videos.
    Has about 3-4 themes (supported by the respective authors) and within those themes a series of views (poster, banner, coverflow, thumbnail, etc.).

    Also MB had a Music plug-in in the works (haven't tried it).
    And it can handle VMC and W7MC recorded videos. (also haven't tried personally)
    You can also look towards MyMovies but that is really DVD-centric. Although it is a great source for movie metadata.

  82. GBPVR for windows by GoNINzo · · Score: 1

    I've been using GBPVR on windows for around 4 some years, and been very happy with it. It does a great job recording, it does a good job keeping a schedule of reencoding, it works with windows codecs, and it does what a DVR should. It has a good interface for scheduling, I have it hooked to Schedules Direct, which I pay $20 a year for. It was easy to install, configure, and hack. The guy who maintains it does a good job providing a quality product for free. I highly recommend this product for anyone who's had to deal with the mess of config files on other DVR's. And it's much better than paying Tivo or whoever $15 a month.

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:GBPVR for windows by roelbj · · Score: 1

      I have to second GB-PVR. The thing plays files in any container I throw at it, and integrates support for daemon tools so you can load .iso DVD images. The community support is exceptionally friendly as well.

  83. Sagetv is multi OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you are looking for a program that runs on Windows, Linux or Apple operating systems then Sagetv is it.
    I use it with Windows Xp and record from 2 SD Directv receivers and 1 HD Directv receiver via HD-PVR. I also capture OTA digital channels.
    Sagetv also incorporates quite a few online video sources and with a free user created addon can access Netflix, Hulu, and a slew of other feeds via Playon server.
    There are quite a few other user created addons including Commercial skip. There is also an extender available that works with the Sagetv software or in standalone mode

  84. Cable box + firewire output by foom · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use:
    4) Cablebox with Firewire output + firewire port on PC.

    It works really quite well.

    Cable companies are required to offer cable boxes with firewire (usually the HD ones all come with it). However, depending on your cableco, the firewire output may or may not be encrypted. You can only connect it to your PC if it is not encrypted.

    Note that the presence or absence of encryption on the Firewire output is *totally independent* from whether the data is encrypted on the cable line. The cable box decrypts the signal with its cable card, and possibly re-encrypts it for the firewire output, depending on the cableco's settings.

    For me (with RCN Boston), I've found that all the extended-basic channels are sent unencrypted over the firewire output, except, paradoxially, *sometimes* the HD OTA channels. I dunno what's up with that, but my solution was to just not go through the cable box for those channels. I don't subscribe to premiums, so I don't know whether they are encrypted or not. Your mileage may of course vary, depending on provider and possibly even region.

  85. Sage TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dual boot Ubuntu 9.10 and XP and try to use Ubuntu as much as I can, however there is no driver support for my TV card so I am forced to use XP for my DVR. I tried several free apps when I first purchased the TV card and all had issues or did not work as well I wanted them to. I found that Sage TV worked the best. Unfortunatly it is not a free software option but in this case it was the best application for the job. I have no complaints with it and it works great. If you are looking for the best functionality that is my recommendation. The free stuff worked well enough, just not great and required too many work arounds. If your willing to put up with some frustration there are plenty of free options, but if you want something that works great then shell out the money, or find a good torrent.

  86. WinXP Virtual + PlayOn = Netflix on linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To take care of the netflix problem, take a look at PlayOn (http://www.playon.tv/playon). They're actually running a 50% off special through today so you could get it for like $20 for a lifetime subscription.

    1. Re:WinXP Virtual + PlayOn = Netflix on linux by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

      Why would you need playon if you have winxp virtual?

  87. Some options by IronChef · · Score: 1

    I have used SageTV on WinXP to timeshift OTA HD and play back other media. It works pretty well, and I even got auto commercial skipping with some cheap shareware addons. But as you probably know getting PREMIUM cable/sat programming into your computer can be a hassle.

    Xbox Media Center I have also found to be a very nice front end for playing back media though I don't think it does TV recording. Despite the name it does not just run on Xboxes. But beware, XBMC is not easy to set up and it has about the most hostile forums I have ever seen, full of "read the damn sticky n00b" replies to questions--and the sticky is actually out of date! Put a long evening in to it and get it running, and it's nice though. It supports every media file I have tried, even lets you switch audio tracks in MKVs.

    If you can separate the television and "other media" playback tasks your life may be easier because recording premium TV shows is a pain in the ass and there are few good computer solutions. Like someone else said, maybe just get a Tivo for TV and netflix, and play back your other media files with a computer. If you have a good smart remote setup, context switching between the television DVR and the HTPC you use for everything else isn't even a big deal, just a button press and a few seconds.

    Good luck.

  88. WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 = Done by thechemic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 = Done. Time shift TV, HD quality Netflix, Media storage and streaming to any xbox, PS3, laptop, desktop, or windows mobile phone. It just works. No tinkering.

    --
    Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    1. Re:WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 = Done by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

      Really? Media center can record unencrypted TV that you can watch on other platforms? And it can do it to a windows home server? Last time I used MCE (Vista) it recorded to ms-dvr files that were encrypted. Couldn't even watch them on a different windows box. Have you actually done this or just reading marketing?

    2. Re:WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 = Done by james_marsh · · Score: 1

      WHS + MEDIA CENTER + XBOX 360 + added ambience of the fans screaming away while watching a movie = Fail

      I was full intending to use my (admittedly older generation) XBOX 360 for video playback but the hassle of needing to have a media server transcode video into something the 360 is happy with (and the resulting loss of seeking) and the noise from the fans soon killed that idea.

      For recording UK DVB TV I have a Topfield 5800 - superb bit of kit with two tuners and a USB port allowing you to copy off the raw DVB MPEG2 video files.

      I now use a Popcorn Hour for playback, and while the UI isn't the prettiest ever, its played every video format I've ever tried flawlessly with no interlacing artefacts and no skipping.

  89. why not just buy a cheap dvd player by mcmoyer · · Score: 1

    before I'd endure the pain of windows media center, I'd just buy a dvd player to supplement the mythfrontend.

    I tried sage, beyondTV and windows media center. The main problem was they were all based on windows. If something wasn't working right, it was very hard to tell what the issue might be. The logging in linux is so much better. Random lockups and reboots were also an issue for me. Interestingly enough, the same hardware worked fine using mythtv.

    1. Re:why not just buy a cheap dvd player by mcmoyer · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention that this was all using HD video coming from the HDHomerun.

  90. Orb.com by b00tleg · · Score: 1

    Orb.com works for me. Runs on windows, sees my hauppauge PVR-250 on Vista Home. It runs an agent in the background, you access "your pc" via mycast.orb.com. From there you can stream mp3s, photos, and an interactive tv guide that lets you watch live channels, set to record shows, or watch previously recorded ones. No ports have to be opened on your router. It tests your bandwidth automatically and has a mobile browser layout that I can stream on my touch pro 2.

  91. Hulu desktop uses apple remote by acomj · · Score: 1

    If you haven't tried it, the apple remote controls Hulu desktop pretty well. The interface takes a little bit to get used to however.

    I should try that eye TV. been Eying it (sorry)

  92. Windows-the only way for HD, BluRay, and Netflix by davidrools · · Score: 1

    I've been using Windows Media Center since the XP version in 2005. Used it in Vista and now 7. I used a Creative TV tuner and its bundled software since 2000. All the while I tried other solutions: BeyondTV, Myth, ATi Hydravision's thing, Arcsoft Total Media, Sage TV, and others, but kept going back to MCE. Windows Media Center is the core and there are a ton of really useful tools to make the most of it. Video cards with HDMI and 7.1 sound piped through the one cable to the A/V receiver is nice. Use Arcsoft Total Media Theater for BD playback. Don't bother with Cyberlink or anything else. Nice media center integration. If you don't need to do HD TV recording, stick with Vista media center. Use LifeExtender for effort free and nearly perfect automated commercial removal. Orb.com has a great service for streaming live and recorded tv to your work computer, smartphone, or other rooms in the house. Using an Xbox360 as a media center extender is handy. Gyration makes a sweet media center remote that also is IR programmable/learning for your TV and Receiver, has a gyroscopic mouse, and operates on RF to a USB dongle for controlling the computer. They also have one w/ a little LCD display for pulling up your music w/o having to turn on your TV. Gotta use Slysoft AnyDVD HD. I also use it for my DVD and BD ripping needs. Ripping BluRay discs takes up SO MUCH SPACE. I have 3 TBs of BDs now =\ Windows broadcasts all your music/movies/photos to all connected computers over the standard protocol and works well as a server...and you can run VMWare if you want even more serverability. MyMovies is a nice DVD/BD Cataloging piece of software that integrates fully into WMC. It will automount BD ISO rips w/ DaemonTools too, so its nice if you plan on doing a BD library on your HTPC. There are also Internet TV plugins available for WMC.

  93. ku band fta by vxice · · Score: 1

    does myth tv, or if not what if any solution, work with ku band fta?

    --
    every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
  94. BitTorrent by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to me, the suite of hardware and software it takes to replace the functionality of an RSS feed on Vuse or uTorrent and a properly hacked XBox / AppleTV / PC with a decent remote with a few extra codecs.

    Why doesn't NBC & Co. go out and get a pile of sponsors, embed ads in an avi and then release that torrent? Of course, it cuts out the local affiliates, but as I recall from reading the US Constitution (which is obsolete, I know), copyrights are there to progress the arts and science. Profits of local affiliates aren't in there.

    1. Re:BitTorrent by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      They do. It is called Hulu.

      My two complaints with hulu is:
      1) Flash ..... ugg
      2) They do not save the first couple eps of the first season of X show. If i'm interested in a new show I do not want to watch the current ep. I want to watch the first 4 eps then decide. I'm not going to buy a dvd box set for a show I've never seen before.

      So yah BT ftw but Hulu is far better than nothing.

    2. Re:BitTorrent by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      I've used Hulu. Finding a single show is complicated, and tracking down the right episode is still more complicated than it needs to be. There's no tracking which shows I've watched. The interface does not port to a TV remote in the slightest, and the only way to watch Hulu on the TV is to have a TV out on the computer, or a DVI in on the TV. Now, an episode of House, embedded with Chevy, Coke and Blue Cross / Blue Shield ads and then made available on a public, established Torrent interface -- that's success. Heck, if iTunes could get the cost per episode down to the pennies per eyeball pair, plus the cost of bandwidth, that'd be far more reasonable than the $2 they charge today.

    3. Re:BitTorrent by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      No. Use plex. It is awesome with hulu! (but unfortunately is still flash.. uggg)

      All you have to do is go to their website and create an account. Then from there I set it to higher quality video in my account playback options and then searched for shows I wanted. I hit the subscribe button on those shows.

      After that I go into plex (xbmc would most likely work too) and put in your account info. From there it will have a menu of subscribed shows with their eps. Once you watch the ep it leaves that list. Also, everything plays in 480p... not perfect quality so i'd recommend bit torrent if you have a large TV but for the most part it works wonders.

      Another issue I have is if I'm away for more than a month and I've subscribed to a show the ep will disappear. I watch the type of shows that you really want to see every ep. It is annoying to manually have to download an ep that disappeared before I got around to it. Personally, I enjoy watching most shows in bulk. for one day I might watch 4 to 8 episodes of X show and just relax. I rarely watch 1 ep at a time. Hulu isn't perfect for that. By default I'm using private trackers + RSS and 720p for everything. I then wrote an auto extract script cuz plex can't see the .rar files. From there in plex next to hulu subscriptions i have my RSS subscriptions all in the same program ready for playback. This helps with HBO shows like true blood.

      All in all, a mix of rss + hulu's subscription option depending on the show makes everything wonderful.

  95. OS X + PS3 Solution by jmrives · · Score: 1

    For several years now, I have been using a mac mini attached to a large, flat panel LCD HD TV monitor and a decent surround-sound system as our digital entertainment hub. For physical DVDs, we just pop it into the mac mini's slot drive and use FrontRow or DVD Player. For digital only media, I tend to use VLC. We do not have cable but we do have an antenna attached that lets us pick up about a dozen HD broadcast channels -- not that we really watch those very much. We sometimes use browser based interfaces to watch content that is streamable from some web site -- such as NetFlix. Though, just recently, NetFlix has partnered with Sony. So, now, we can watch NetFlix's streamable media (movies and TV shows) via the PS3, which, by-the-way, serves as our blu-ray media player. I found a universal remote that works with the PS3. So, now, we just have one remote for the TV monitor, the mac mini, the PS3 and the sound system.

    We don't really have a need for a DVR. So, that is not part of our solution. Though, if we want to, I did pick up an eyetv hybrid just to try it out. We could inline that to the mac-mini. It comes with DVR software that looks pretty decent. Since, I have not played with a TiVo or any other DVR, I can not really compare the two interfaces.

    Occasionally, we purchase content from iTunes and the above setup serves as our digital music hub as well.

  96. Depends what you're after... by Daley_G · · Score: 1

    I've been using some sort of DVR since the technology was young. I've not used every option out there, so I can't speak for the commercial offerings like Tivo, et al. What I do have some experience with are the offerings from Microsoft, MythTV (and several derivatives), and a few "install this on your XP box" software applications. It all boils down to what you want, what you're willing to do (and pay) to get it and what you're willing to put up with. Being a bit more on the tech-savvy end of the spectrum (and a cheap bastard!), I ultimately settled on MythTV in a backend/frontend configuration. I settled on Mythbuntu and MiniMyth, but I can't say it's a flawless system. In a "normal" family environment, it may not have a high WAF - something that even as a geek, I'm not thrilled with. I will say however that I feel I'm pretty close to having it reliable enough to go full-on. It takes more than a basic understanding of computers and networking, and a bit of Linux experience to boot. Certainly not mainstream. Windows simply wasn't stable enough - sure, it may take a small bit of fiddling to get the Linux solutions *working*, they're generally a bit more solid than the Windows solutions I've used. Crashing or locking up halfway through a movie or show is simply unacceptable to me - something Linux has never done. So in short, my list of factors and features in order of importance goes something like this: * stability/reliability/consistency - if it does the same thing every time and doesn't stop until it's supposed to, it's easier to resolve issues and makes for a much more enjoyable experience. * ease of use - the ten-foot UI as it's called must be just that. I (and more importantly, the members of my family) need to be able to control 100% of the system from the couch. If I have to have a keyboard, it's still a PC with a TV-out card, not a dedicated STB and nor should it be. * intuitive UI - any system will take some "getting used to", but the menu system needs to be well laid-out. A good example of a bad menu is the interface by many of the cable companies I've seen in their STB's. * sensible features - a media center should be just that - a media center. It should be able to play anything from movies to television shows to DVD's to network-shared files, whether they're images, videos or audio files. * extensibility/flexibility - nobody is going to want the exact same feature-set out of any given system, so it should be able to adapt to the environment. I personally don't play the stereo at the house so much, so my system's build wasn't built with much focus on MP3's. I do however like to pull the weather and traffic up in the morning, and that's only a few mouse-clicks, err, button-clicks on the remote away. Take some time and explore the options and the features they provide. Try some and weed out the ones that don't fit the bill. I personally don't think there's anything out there that's perfect, but if you do the research that you'd do for any other major endeavor, you'll be able to make an educated decision

  97. Sagetv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using SageTV for my HTPC for around 2 years and i have to admit that it really been the best solution for my needs. Lately i have been thinking around building a new HTPC using windows 7 media center which i have heard a number of good things. as for netflix i get the movies from itunes and us something like handbrake to convert them to divx and stream them to my HTPC. it works for me at least. :-)

  98. Moonlight does not work with Netflix by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 2, Informative
    Moonlight is not the answer to the Netflix streaming video problem. I've got Moonlight 1.0.1 installed (been looking for a way to stream video to my linux box from Netflix) and here is what you get from Netflix when you try to stream a movie:

    Watching instantly on your computer Our apologies — streaming is not supported for your operating system. Note that your current Internet browser is fully compatible with adding titles to the Instant Queue for later watching on compatible devices. Complete System Requirements To watch instantly, you'll need a computer that meets the following minimum requirements: * Windows o Windows XP with Service Pack 2, or Vista o Internet Explorer 6.0 or higher; or Firefox 2 or higher o 1.2 GHz processor o 512 MB RAM * Mac o An Intel-based Mac with OS 10.4.8 or later o Safari 3 or higher; or Firefox 2 or higher o 1 GB RAM

  99. GB-PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised this one hasn't been mentioned. it's a freeware package written in New Zealand by a single programmer, and it is a seriously impressive program. I highly recommend you check it out; I have used it for 3 years with essentially no downtime. It handles all recording (3 tuners) and serves up an interface to media extenders (MVP in my case, NMT for HD viewers). it allows for pre and post processing, e.g. commercial removal, transcoding etc. I tried it at the same time I was trying to build a Myth/Linuz box and it wasn't even close; GB-PVR installed and worked.
    2 thumbs up

  100. Freevo by inkrypted · · Score: 1

    I'll throw my hat in the ring for Freevo it works on Windows and Linux. It has been working great for me.

    --
    Chris Sheppard
  101. Hauppauge HD-PVR and Snapstream BeyondTV by ayden · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using Snapstream BeyondTV for 4 years. I started first with a Hauppauge SD tuner card. I now have a Happaugue HD-PVR, a Motorola HD FiOS box and change channels with a USB-UIRT. The Motorola HD box connects the HD-PVR with component video and optical SPDIF cables. The HD-PVR connects to my Win7-x64 system via USB.

    BeyondTV downloads the TV guide, manages the recording schedule and controls the HD-PVR and Motorola HD box with the USB-UIRT. The recording format is an H.264 transport stream (the file type is .tp) which uses about 3.6 GB per hour on the HD-High quality setting. These files are readily burned to a Blu-ray disk without re-encoding. The system is completely seamless.

    My next step is to configure a DLNA enabled LG Blu-ray player in my living room to which I can stream the recorded files.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    1. Re:Hauppauge HD-PVR and Snapstream BeyondTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This++. I can't say enough good things about BeyondTV. I only use it to record broadcast content, though, so I can't comment on its abilities with DVDs or other media types.

      For TV recording/playback, though, it's seamless. Love it.

    2. Re:Hauppauge HD-PVR and Snapstream BeyondTV by Kloro · · Score: 1

      I like BeyondTV for standard Definition TV, but not so much for HD television mapping the QAM channels is a real chore. There are whole threads on the Snapstream forum detailing these issues, but Snapsteam has announced that development for the BeyondTV product is pretty much dead (other than the experimental betas.) I also own a TIVO, and the QAM mapping was all done for me, I just had to turn off the channels I wasn't getting. The other thing about TIVO is that you can use a cable card with it, which, from reading the Snapstream forums, hasn't been done with BeyondTV.

    3. Re:Hauppauge HD-PVR and Snapstream BeyondTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used BeyondTV with great success with a Hauppauge SD tuner. But when I upgraded to the latest Beyond TV and HD-PVR, it has been nothing but fail. It won't go more than a couple of days before it can't talk to the HDPVR anymore. And to get it to last that long I put a timer on teh HDPVR to reset it every day in the middle of the night. It's been very frustrating. It would work like a dream if it just worked.

  102. Link record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the LINK have any DVR functionality?

    1. Re:Link record? by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      I don't know. It has VLC, which can save streams, and it can run Boxee, XBMC, and MythTV, but I don't know if it has the hardware. The OSD is definitely a DVR, though. That's how I've been using it exclusively. It has inputs for S-Video, composite video, and stereo audio, as well as Ethernet and USB connections.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  103. GB-PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love GB-PVR, Windows freeware.

  104. Maybe someone should by mjwx · · Score: 1

    make a simple to install package of Myth. A package that has/downloads all the prerequisites of the correct version, does most of the config with minimal user input and can be installed onto a vanilla Linux install (just pick a major distro or two like Red Hat or Ubuntu and ignore the whiners who keep complaining about $OBSCURE_DISTRO as this product is not for them).

    I've looked at mythbuntu but haven't had the time (read: been arsed) to install it yet but the install looks straightforward but beyond the capabilities of the average user. Knopmyth is out there as well but have heard a few text based config issues with it.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    1. Re:Maybe someone should by smoker2 · · Score: 1
  105. Windows Media Center 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Media center 7. The end. Best of everything. Blu-ray, DVD, recorded HDTV. Plus, soon you'll be able to have non-OEM built computers with cablecard. Nothing else can touch it.

  106. Neuros Link? by ghostis · · Score: 1

    I have a Neuros OSD. Works well for what it is. Link is their new HD product. Has anyone tried it?

    --


    Computer Science is all about trying to find the right wrench to bang in the right screw. -T.Cumbo?
  107. Depends what you're looking for. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    Really, this question is like every technology.

    If you want "damn it, just work" and willing to drop a few hundred, get a TiVo. I have one (Series 2) with the Lifetime contract (if I sold it now it'd be worth more than it was when it was new because of that). It works great, doesn't screw up, pretty easy to hack (bigger HDDs), intuitive interface, integrates with Blockbuster, Netflix, connects to the computer, ... The only problem is ads. They're everywhere - trying to sell me some car or buy some movie or order a pizza (ugh) whenever I go into the menus. What the fuck? I paid for the damn thing, and it didn't start out with ads...

    If you want a bit more flexibility, maybe multiple tuners or automatic reencoding or commercial-skipping or remote-play, but don't want to fuss with it and don't mind a bit of cash (less than a TiVo), Windows Media Center works great. I hate Microsoft, and I don't use Windows, but WMC is a quality product. It's more hackable than the TiVo, free listings, multi-tuner support, CableCARD support (want your Discovery HD?), and the files are more-or-less standard. There's a vibrant community providing such things as commercial skipping and all manner of scripts and whatnot. Only reason I stopped using it is because I stopped using Windows.

    If you want the ultimate in flexibility, and virtually no cost, but don't mind spending a weekend setting it up, go with MythTV. If you can imagine it, it can do it. Have a backend with several tuners in your basement to record cable, stick another backend in the attic to get HD DTV with good reception. Save it all on a NAS box in the garage. Stream it all over the web, to your iPhone, to your laptop in the bathroom. Set up diskless network-booting frontends wherever you want them. Take a tablet PC, give it a small SSD, and have a wireless TV (live or recorded). Access all your shows from any frontend. Start a show, finish it in another room. Commercial skipping, firewire capture, home automation, picture-in-picture, IR blasting, integrated torrenting if you want it - the list goes on. Anti-corporate, no broadcast flag here. But there's no CableCARD support, because they're not bully-able enough.

    In short, you have two curves - the decreasing cost curve, coupled with the increasing effort curve - just like any other bit of technology. I've used all three of these solutions - they all work great. It depends what you're looking for.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Depends what you're looking for. by gregmac · · Score: 1

      I have to agree here, MythTV is the ultimate flexibility.

      I just went through the same thing the OP went through. I've been using Myth for about 4 years, and was on 0.21 on a 4-year old install of Debian, and was getting annoyed because I was missing some codecs, had some stability issues (which was something in H/W, but I have no idea what). On top of that, I wanted some small frontends for around the house. So since I had to rebuild the box, I was willing to try some other systems out.

      I first tried SageTV, because of it's apparent extendability, and mostly because of the $200 HD-capable, silent, small frontends. I tried both the standard and the SageMC UI. After using Mythtv for so long, I *really* tried to get used to it, but I just hated the way the UI worked, and the general workflow of how recordings, playback, etc worked, as well as how you browse music (it was really not any better than MythMusic, which is just plain sad), and videos. A *major* negative, it has no streaming radio support. WTF?

      GB-PVR is quite promising, but again, the UI is not quite there. I was actually really tempted to hack on this, and get it to where I wanted it.. but in the meantime, I'd have no TV. I found in particular the recording support lacking. In myth, I can say "record this at any time, keep 2, delete the oldest". In GB-PVR, this concept doesn't really exist, you can only "favourite" the series, and then it just records all of them I guess? I found no options for how many to keep, etc. Particularly with The Simpsons, which is on about 14 times a week, I'd like to keep a handful so when I actually feel like watching it, I can find one I have only seen 20 times instead of 50.

      I had a HECK of a time getting either a Windows MCE remote and a Hauppage remote (pvr-150) working totally properly in Sage and GB-PVR.. I never did quite get it fully functioning (some buttons did nothing. In GB-PVR, when I pressed the "windows" button on the MCE remote, Windows media center opened). Setting up GB-PVR as a client is a bit hackish feeling, since you have to use network shares and set a bunch of things manually.. it's not like myth, where you can just point it at the IP and it works.

      I also gave Windows Media Center a very quick shot. It has a very nice looking UI, but it's architecture is severely crap. I think it's two tuners max (I could be wrong), only works with very select hardware, and its extenders, from what I can tell, are basically RDP clients, which means the server has to be beefy. And I believe you are limited to two. You can link multiple WMCs with some hacks (involving network shares mostly), but it's just ugly.

      I was trying to use XBMC as a frontend for a while (thinking of it as an alternative frontend to myth), and I did have it working really great on an asrock ION 330.. but it's mythtv support is not that great. There's a project on google code that looks very promising, and I tried it later on my laptop, but it was just crashing. I didn't investigate further. Maybe in a few months or a year it will be there.. but not yet.

      So after all that, I went back to Mythtv (0.22) on a brand new Asrock board with integrated HDMI and digital audio. I also have a frontend running on my old mythtv box (albeit really scaled down) and an asrock ION 330. I'm using Mythbuntu now, which is great. All my remotes worked flawlessly out of the box. The tuner worked right away. My only real complaints right now: DVD playback is broken (audio/video sync issue), and mythstream (streaming audio support) is not working on 0.22 yet (though there is a alpha quality build for it). Oh, and one of the frontends is on a standard 4:3 TV, and there is currently only one theme that looks reasonable on it. Other than that, it's impossible to tell if you're on the main backend or a frontend, it's the same experience.

      --
      Speak before you think
  108. Media Center Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Sage TV (http://www.sage.tv/) on XP (If you're going to end up going that route anyways). It's been pretty reliable and I like the interface.

    I've also considered moving to Windows 7. I hear the media center functionality built in is pretty robust.

    I use Media Center for Windows 7 and I absolutely love it. I use an extender for another TV and works with no problems. I have a dual QAM tuner and also dual analog and it handles drivers and also great signal and recording. I would highly recommend getting Windows 7 for this functionality. Just remember if you do, that you don't need Ultimate to get this Media Center.

  109. try pytivo again by danpritts · · Score: 2, Informative

    ++ as far as tivo's actual DVR functionality.

    if pytivo thinks you have an HD Tivo, it won't change the resolution at all (it does transcode to mpeg2). The series3 will scale the video itself (and it has a pretty good scaler chip in my experience).

    If it thinks you have a series2, it will change the res, presumably to 640x480 but i haven't checked. Perhaps you misconfigured it so it thought you had a series2.

    pytivo tries to detect if your file uses a supported codec (includes ac3), and just copy the audio stream if so; otherwise it transcodes, but the default transcoding target is in fact AC3.

    I *have* had problems with 5.1 sound not being properly mixed down to stereo (yeah, yuck, but it's what i had until recently). The center channel was always sent to one speaker or the other. not sure if it's pytivo (ffmpeg really, it does the transcoding) or the tivo that causes this. I haven't really tried to debug it.

    it is under active development and the devs seem to pay attention to support requests on the forums, so i'd suggest you give it another shot.

    you need to make sure you have a good ffmpeg build. this can be non-trivial; the one that comes with your linux distro may not be good/new enough. the pytivo forums have links to win32 binaries that work for most people. If you're on a mac or bsd, try the ffmpeg-devel port rather than the ffmpeg port.

    pytivo recently gained the ability to stream from DVD images. I haven't tested this but i suspect it works fine.

    I like pytivo a lot, the only issue i have with it is speed. I have this cpu (1.9GHz dual-core athlon) and it's not fast enough to transcode hi-def in realtime.

    you xfer the program and it dribbles through and you can watch it later.

    More importantly, i've tried pre-transcoding and just transferring the mpeg-2 stream (pytivo will not transcode this at all), and the tivo (presumably) can't keep up, it still is a bit slower than realtime. That's annoying; i can pre-transcode or buy a faster cpu, but if the streaming just isn't fast enough then i'm kinda stuck. I am using 100Mbit wired ethernet, it's not some crappy wireless that's the issue. I haven't really investigated this.

    1. Re:try pytivo again by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >If it thinks you have a series2, it will change the res, presumably to 640x480 but i haven't checked. Perhaps you misconfigured it so it thought you had a series2.

      Interesting. I will check that out. Although DVD quality isn't much better than 640x480 to start with (which I want I wanted- DVD SD quality). I seem to remember it lowering the bitrate more than anything- HORRIBLE motion artifacts.

      >I *have* had problems with 5.1 sound not being properly mixed down to stereo (yeah, yuck, but it's what i had until recently). The center channel was always sent to one speaker or the other. not sure if it's pytivo (ffmpeg really, it does the transcoding) or the tivo that causes this. I haven't really tried to debug it.

      You mean PyTivo downmixing it? TiVo? Or your amp? I don't want it downmixed at all- I want/need to hear the original 5.1 sound of the source material. I just checked the docs on pytivo and it certainly seems to support ac3 in transcoded or copy mode (if compatible... which I think DVD AC3 should be). I REALLY need to try again... this could be great.

      >you need to make sure you have a good ffmpeg build. this can be non-trivial; the one that comes with your linux distro may not be good/new enough

      I am using the PLF version so that should be as good as it gets ;)

    2. Re:try pytivo again by danpritts · · Score: 1

      I had only a stereo sound system, was getting stereo analog out of the tivo.

      i don't know what the root cause of the problem was, whether ffmpeg was improperly downmixing it, or the tivo was. i'd bet on ffmpeg; i probably configured pytivo to do the downmix to save space on the tivo or something stupid like that.

      I never really spent any time troubleshooting it so it's really hard to say what the problem was. If you configure it to just pass through 5.1 sound to your tivo (this is probably the default), odds are good it will just work.

      The bitrates it transcodes to are configurable, and the default for s3 tivos is 8mbit I think. If it has a native mpeg2 stream it won't transcode at all, it will just pass it down to the tivo.

      ftr dvd is 720x480 with rectangular pixels. The widescreen square-pixel display res of 480p is 854x480 or something close to that.

    3. Re:try pytivo again by danpritts · · Score: 1

      my 5.1 downmix problems were due to either ffmpeg/pytivo or the tivo, and odds are good it was ffmpeg, and that it was my fault in misconfiguring it.

      pytivo will default to something like 8mbit/sec bitrate for an hdtivo. ffmpeg won't actually use that much for dvd-sourced content, it won't need it, but it's not limited in any significant way by default.

    4. Re:try pytivo again by markdavis · · Score: 1

      OK! I got the time to install pytivo again. WOW! Everything just works!!! 264/AC3/avi streams perfectly with all features and quality intact. I threw other formats, bitrates, codecs, and containers at it and I couldn't find a SINGLE thing that didn't work. I am extremely impressed! This is the best thing that ever happened to a TiVo.

      Apparently my experiences with pytivo from 1.5 years ago are way beyond outdated. Thanks to everyone on Slashdot for prompting me to try it again. :)

  110. DVR & beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't limit yourself to just a DVR concept. Here's what I did:

    http://www.apple.com/macmini/
    http://www.apple.com/keyboard/
    http://www.apple.com/magicmouse/
    http://www.elgato.com/elgato/na/mainmenu/products/hybrid09/product1.en.html
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20Technology/MS2SF7W20T32/
    http://www.magicjack.com/2/?mid=308001&a=55959&s=15

    You get a full Mac (couch surfing in 1080p (1920x1080) on an HDTV is mighty cool) so you can do regular computer stuff, including streaming your YouTube, Hulu, and other mind-numbing junk. Use the "media center" features of FrontRow to play your music, movies, TV shows, podcasts, music videos, etc. managed by iTunes, view all your photos from iPhoto, play DVDs if you need to, catch movie previews, and stream stuff from other computers. The EyeTV hybrid gets you HDTV (we do over-the-air only, cause we get everything else from the internet) and DVR and radio. The magicJack runs in the background providing telephone service throughout the house now (cause we told the telco to get lost). The 2TB hard drive holds ALL my media (pics, movies, music, etc. - yes I have a backup).

    The cool part is I can control it all from the wireless keyboard/mouse, & Apple remote, and/or my iPhone, and/or other networked computers in the house with the built-in remote desktop. So, I can control the action from my iPhone without fiddling with a herd of stupid million-tiny-button remote controls, and I can pop open a window on the computer in the office (den) and see what the kids are playing in the living room, and control it as well. This whole setup is slicker than snot. I've never seen products from other makers that come together like this and work so amazingly well.

  111. How about SiliconDust HDHomeRun by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    So, I was thinking,

    SiliconDust HDHomeRun HDHR-US Dual Networked High Definition Digital Television
    streaming to a dual core system running Myth backend.

      I don't know if I could get away with a dual core atom box and some disk. I have a NAS
    already so I could always mount that.

    Front end, PS/3 to the bigger TV and some Original Xboxes I have around the house.

    Does Myth Stream DLNA well?

    I'm thinking about replacing the xboxes with something else.

    1. Re:How about SiliconDust HDHomeRun by pestie · · Score: 1

      The HDHomeRun works very well with Myth. That's how my system here works and it performs pretty much flawlessly (at least since I diagnosed and replaced a faulty network switch that was dropping packets at random, but not enough to cause a complete failure).

      I do know you won't be able to play HD content with the original Xbox, though. I have Xebian on my original Xbox and tried using it as a Myth front-end for a while but it just doesn't have the horsepower for anything over DVD resolution.

      I don't know about using dual-core Atom - if you meant just for the back end, that should be fine. If you want to play back HD content, I'm not so sure. My Atom-based netbook seems to do OK (just barely) with down-scaled (to the netbook's native 1024x600 resolution) HD, but I've never tried it with a bigger external monitor. It is presumably having to do the decoding and scaling before it displays the content and it does keep up most of the time. I seem to remember it stuttering a bit on high bit-rate streams. I can't really remember much, though, as I don't really use my netbook as a Myth front-end very much.

      I have no idea what DLNA is, so I can't speak to that.

  112. Ive been using Boxee with great results by gearloos · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised theres not a lot of chatter about it. Boxee does Netflix, Internet TV , and DVD's very well. I havent tried my eyetv with it yet so can't say about the over the air tv but eyetv handles that so well, /i don't mind switching between them.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  113. Beyond TV by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    I use Beyond TV on Windows 7 x64, previously on Vista and it works ok. My chief complaint is that I can't stream live tv to any other platform but Windows using their Beyont TV Link program for which they charge a per computer licenses, which is really pretty B.S.

    It does auto convert recordings to divx format each night (it does other formats as well) and I can access them from the shared out folder it drops them in after converting them or through the web interface it provides. Since they're saved in divx format I can watch them on pretty much any platform I want as well.

    You can also set up multiple tuners and designate which channels each is able to record for; for instance I have a PoS Pinnacle 800i that is incapable of recording channels 5 & 6, so I have those disabled on it, while my Hauppauge 2250 is able to.

    Of course because it's running on windows that means I can also have no problem with netflix and other programs that require windows...

    Beyond TV isn't perfect; I sometimes have problems with the Media Specific Player links starting streaming correctly, and seems to not work at all with teh divx web player 2.0, though vlc works fine; overall it's a pretty good program though.

  114. GBPVR strongly recommended! by aberson · · Score: 1

    I used to run Myth ~2 years ago, but got fed up with issues and linux in general (ok, so kill me slashdot). Then I switched to SageTV which was nice for a while.

    IR control: At the time I used WinLirc to transmit IR to control my Dish network box and it worked pretty well. Needed a custom script to take SageTV's channel changing format and translate it to WinLirc's format, but worked after some tweaks. Not sure about motorola but don't see why it would be a problem with enough work - LIRC has a great resource for IR codes. [I was using a homebrew IR blaster... basically an IR diode and a resistor hanging off the DTR line of the serial port]

    Built a new HTPC 2 months ago with Win XP for simplicity and netflix access. I tried both GB-PVR and MediaPortal. Mediaportal looks flashier, but the UI is much slower and lacks a few key features... which is why I went back to GB-PVR. I've been very happy. Very few crashes, but should probably setup a weekly reboot for insurance. Yeah it's not open source, but it's still free. There's a plugin for GBPVR which will let you launch Zinc for all your streaming content, including netflix. There's a FANTASTIC web interface, including the ability to stream any of your recordings (think Slingbox). There's a plugin to control uTorrent. And GBPVR can work directly with a media extender like Popcorn Hour, if you don't want to have another PC for another room. [Though you can build a whole mini PC for the other room for the same cost as a popcorn hour]

    A friend of mine tried Windows 7's media center features and is very happy. His small daughters can run it, including playing back all of their DVD's that he has ripped to a server.

    In the unlikely event that anyone is actually interested:

    TUNER: I built the HTPC with a Hauppauge 1600 tuner card. Initially intending to get free ATSC over the air, I discovered I could get the same channels from my cable provider in clear QAM without needing the antenna. (Cable is for cable modem only). The digital side of the tuner can record more than 1 stream as long as it's on the same physical RF channel. Plus I can use the analog tuner simultaneously for standard-def recording. So I can record 2+ shows at once, from one card.

    MOTHERBOARD: I put that in a mini itx case on an intel atom 330 mobo with s-video output and built in spdif audio (though I did have to make my own cable for the spdif). Svideo was useful until I got a better TV. Mobo only has VGA output, so that limited my HDTV selection slightly, but not bad. The whole thing (tuner, mobo, case, ram, HD) was http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813121359
    review, explaining video capability at 1080p: http://www.mini-itx.com/reviews/atoms/default.asp?page=8

    GUIDE DATA: setup was a pain (and a real learning curve about digital TV), but now that I got it all figured out I'm getting it for free using MC2XML.

    Good DTV / QAM Channel references:

    http://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/channels_us
    http://www.antennaweb.org/aw/welcome.aspx
    http://www.titantv.com/
    http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/

    1. Re:GBPVR strongly recommended! by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

      +1 for GB-PVR. I just built two of them for family members as Christmas gifts. Roughly $200 each for a used Pentium 4 computer and DVR bits. Runs great at 1920 x 1080 on my 1080p LCD TV. Scheduling, recording and time-shifting are flawless. One thing I want to get working is sharing recordings between DVRs peer-to-peer style, a la ATT U-Verse DVRs: "Record on one TV, play back from any TV in the house." I asked on the GB-PVR forums about this, seems it's possible. I suppose I have to build myself several of these in order to test this out.

    2. Re:GBPVR strongly recommended! by aberson · · Score: 1

      For sharing between DVR's, one solution is to move all of your capture cards to a single GBPVR server, and then make all of your rooms "clients" to that server. (Or use a popcorn hour media extender as the client)

      Another perhaps simpler option is to make each PVR's "recordings" folder a network share, and then add that network share as a "video library" folder on all the other machines, so you'll be able to browse each PVR's recordings from all the other PVRs

  115. "just works" or "working on it" by digital+photo · · Score: 1

    Several years ago, went down this road. Did the research, setup a test box, went through the upgrade-now-its-broken-my-wife-wondering-why-her-shows-(not recorded/not playing/plays badly/hard to program/etc).

    In the end, I decided that the tv's end point was an "appliance". Ie, like the toaster, microwave, etc... It should just work.

    To that end, I went with Tivo. Then TivoS2, and now, TivoHD.

    It records shows, can schedule, between the two, I an record 4 shows concurrently in sd/hd. I can xfer the content to my pc fileserver wherebit can be restreamed to the tivo ala the various streaming client/server apps. I can strea netflix to both boxes.

    Could I have built and maintained a mythtv/freevo/etc box? Sure. But in my case, it made more sense to go the appliance route and focus on what mattered: content.

    Ymmv.

    1. Re:"just works" or "working on it" by alan92rttt · · Score: 1

      I have 2 big issues with TIVO and any closed box system. 1) its a single function box. If you want to play a divx file from a computer in the house, play a DVD, slide show photos, play mp3's you need something extra. I like that my media PC can do it all. 2) saving older recording and keeping HD quality. I have not seen an efficient way to do this.

    2. Re:"just works" or "working on it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of those are doable on the TiVo HD series, and probably earlier ones too.

      Divx, DVD (ripped as vob/mpeg-2), photos, mp3 - you can use pyTiVo to make all of those available from your PC/Mac to your TiVo. The TiVo sees your computer as another TiVo on the network and will transfer media from it at the touch of a button. It's all accessible from the main "Now Playing" menu on the TiVo.

      Saving recordings - plenty of programs exist to transfer recordings FROM the TiVo to your computer. I use iTiVo on the Mac. The one and only caveat is that your cable provider can set the no-copy flag on certain channels or programs and the TiVo will honor that flag - disallowing you from transferring those shows. It varies widely by provider. OTA channels are required by law to be copyable (no flag set).

      I can say that FiOS has never set the flag on anything, including HBO. I have all 7 seasons of Curb Your Enthusiasm saved from the TiVo to the computer, bit-for-bit identical to the original recordings, and the latest season in HD as it was broadcast.

      tivocommunity.com has all the info you need.

  116. Test dvr comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    testing comment on dvrs

  117. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BeyondTv

  118. Under the radar for whatever reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been using SageTV since 2003. I have high def using sat service, multiple tuners, full house distribution using media extenders, all media formats imaginable and the kind of stability you need when a mother-in-law, 6 year old kid and of course a wife all are avid users (as in, it;s all we use). My wife would kill me if I got rid of it. Most pvr software packages are either toys or gimped. Sage just quietly goes on working while most people that think they know what they're talking about ignore it for whatever reason.

  119. I use PirateBay by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Its cheap, reliable and fast. No DRM.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    1. Re:I use PirateBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what do you use to get it to your TV?

  120. Alternatives I use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Get a ROKU for Netflix; it's $99 and has EVERY possible connection -- WiFi & Cat5, Coax to HDMI. Great for the bedroom. Simplest remote ever made!
    2. For digital broadcast, get a SiliconDust which gives you two tuners on your home network, and TotalMedia software (w/scheduler and time-shift) for each Windows box -- hook one up to your HD TV.
    3. Dump the cable or satellite, and go get http://www.zeevee.com/zinc (Windows or Mac). You should find most of your shows here, plus Netflix movie-browsing & Instant Queue.
    4. Shows not yet available via ZINC are often available via the show's website, at least for a few weeks after initial broadcast. Only thing I haven't found yet is "Doctor Who".
    5. Get a Samsung BluRay -- it upconverts DVD, has Netflix and Pandora. Under $200 at Walmart.
    6. Get the DSI wireless keyboard -- it has MCE controls, a trackball and scrollwheel (w/third mouse button).
    7. If you want to use Windows Media Center, do NOT use XP/MCE or Vista! The scheduler does not work correct on either -- no sub-channels. Win7 Home Premium is supposed to be fixed.

  121. Myth is still best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody offers the flexibility that a myth/xbmc partnership offers. Most consumer grade products are going to cost around $250 per tv. These same products are locked down in some way or just limited functionality.

    $180 for a sage front end.
    $200 for a xbox360 front end.
    $150 to $500 for a Tivo front end! Then there are service fees of $120/yr !!!
    $250 for a apple tv.

    Or you can go home brew with
    One old Dell PC obtained for free to be a backend with Linux (whatever flavour) and MYTH .21.
    Two Happauge 150 cards for ~$55 each for the backend. Could even add a third card or even a Happauge 1950 for HD.
    Two used xbox for $36 each to be frontends with xbmc and myth2xbmc.
    One year subscription to schedules direct for $20.

    So $250 for setting up PVR in two rooms. Another room will be another $40-45 investment. Need more memory to handle the HD content just drop in a larger drive or plug in a USB external HD.

    You might loose a few hours of sleep but its worth it in the end and your friends (techs or technophobic) will be envious.

  122. My 2 cents by baughdw · · Score: 1

    I've been using Snapstream's BeyondTV for several years. I've got 3 BTV boxes in my house. I tried to set up a Myth box one time. It was too complicated for me. I absolutely dread when stuff doesn't work and I have to go online and figure out how to make it work. I've still had to do a little of that with BTV, but overall it's been pretty good. It does lock up now and then and my relatively recent addition of a Hauppauge HD-PVR box has been an absolute bust (love the rest of my Hauppauge hardware, but the HD-PVR requires daily, sometimes hourly, reboots). Anytime BTV misses a show I have to hear the wife say, "Why does it always mess up on my shows?" So it happens, but not so often that the wife insists on a change. For important stuff, I set up recordings on more than one box. They're all networked so I can watch any show on any TV. I also have a HD cable STB PVR that I never use because the UI is awful. I just control it using the previously mentioned HD-PVR under BTV.

  123. Boxee.tv by wfleming · · Score: 1

    Take a look at http://www.boxee.tv/ multi-platform, netflix, just to name a few of the functions and apps. New beta coming december 7th... I've used it for a few months and like what it can do, excited for the beta.

  124. Cablecards and DVRs controlling 4 streams by OCURServant · · Score: 1

    Its called Windows 7 media center, yes it is a microsux product. Now every pc that meets minimum specs can run the ATI DCT (digital cable tuners) with cablecards by running the digital cable advisor. This allows you to easily setup a four tuner dvr which will allow you to share tv shows with other PCs running windows and also stream live feeds plus recorded shows to extenders. With the new firmware of the ATI tuners (1.19) the shows are no longer encrypted unless specified by the network. In my area San Francisco bay area even showtime and hbo are not encrypted. If a show is you can still stream it to the extenders without a problem you just can not share it with other PCs. So yes you can have a four tuner HD dvr for a monthly cost of nothing, since S cards (a type of cablecard) are free in my area (SF comcast) it beats paying 20 bucks a month for the comcast two tuner DVR imo. If you want more info check thegreenbutton.com (a microsoft supported site).

    1. Re:Cablecards and DVRs controlling 4 streams by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      Only the first cablecard is free. Every one after that is $2.05 a month for the same TV. If comcast finds out your broadcasting your content to other TVs they'll tac on another $6 a month for each TV that uses a cable card on top of the $2.05 .. if I remember the pricing right.

  125. Plex is the best media center software by donovansmith · · Score: 1

    I know this doesn't help the OP's search for a good software DVR, but for media center functionality, Plex on Mac OS X is hard to beat. Windows Media Center on Windows 7 is indeed quite good and handily beats things like Apple's Front Row (which is really a bad joke). Plex happens to be even better by a long shot. It is easy to use and navigate, and also does things like pulling in artwork and ratings from IMDB for movies. On my late 2007-rev. Mac mini it even plays 1080p movies pretty well which is quite a feat considering the 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo CPU and anemic GMA950 graphics. The main downside, other than lack of DVR functionality, is that it depends on plugins for things like Hulu and Netflix. Netflix seems to work okay but Hulu, mainly due to Hulu doing everything it can to block applications from accessing it, is flaky at best. For browsing an existing library of video files I have found nothing better, though. Best of all it was very easy to set up.

    I don't know how much software DVRs have advanced from when I last messed with a Hauppauge WinTV card 6 years ago, but from what I've read it's still a hair-pulling experience. I even loathed using my cable company's DVR box a couple years ago. Even if it was easy enough to use, it was just a pain to go through and have to select what I want recorded and hoping that the program would fit exactly in the timeslot and that the program's schedule wouldn't change. All too often I ended up with the beginning or end of the program cut off or a football game or something else even though the DVR functioned exactly as it was supposed to. If Hulu can seriously bump up its program selection and comes up with a way for third-party programs to interface with it then I think it may very well be the future of how TV is watched on computers. I don't even care if I have to sit through stupid commercials, I just want to watch what I want when I want to watch it.

    1. Re:Plex is the best media center software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this doesn't help the OP's search for a good software DVR, but for media center functionality, Plex on Mac OS X is hard to beat. Windows Media Center on Windows 7 is indeed quite good and handily beats things like Apple's Front Row (which is really a bad joke). Plex happens to be even better by a long shot. It is easy to use and navigate, and also does things like pulling in artwork and ratings from IMDB for movies. On my late 2007-rev. Mac mini it even plays 1080p movies pretty well which is quite a feat considering the 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo CPU and anemic GMA950 graphics. The main downside, other than lack of DVR functionality, is that it depends on plugins for things like Hulu and Netflix. Netflix seems to work okay but Hulu, mainly due to Hulu doing everything it can to block applications from accessing it, is flaky at best. For browsing an existing library of video files I have found nothing better, though. Best of all it was very easy to set up.

      I don't know how much software DVRs have advanced from when I last messed with a Hauppauge WinTV card 6 years ago, but from what I've read it's still a hair-pulling experience. I even loathed using my cable company's DVR box a couple years ago. Even if it was easy enough to use, it was just a pain to go through and have to select what I want recorded and hoping that the program would fit exactly in the timeslot and that the program's schedule wouldn't change. All too often I ended up with the beginning or end of the program cut off or a football game or something else even though the DVR functioned exactly as it was supposed to. If Hulu can seriously bump up its program selection and comes up with a way for third-party programs to interface with it then I think it may very well be the future of how TV is watched on computers. I don't even care if I have to sit through stupid commercials, I just want to watch what I want when I want to watch it.

      Absolutely agree with this. Plexapp.com - it rox.

  126. AT&T U-Verse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just recently moved into the Chicago area and I got all set up with tv and Internet through AT&T. They run it all through a massive modem/router thing that you can stage anywhere in your house, then you just run Ethernet cable to where you want your tv and plug into the little uverse tv box. It runs coax, composite/component, and HDMI as well as optical audio. Neat thing is, all outputs are always on! You just configure what your aspect ratio and max resolution through the easy-to-use menu. We have one DVR box and two satellite boxes in our apartment and we just run Ethernet cables to each one (using a regular old switch to split off to different rooms). The main DVR box in the living room can do all the pause and rewind live tv stuff but the other two can't. I couldn't care less about pausing tv. The cool thing is, any box can request to record shows (also mobile phones and through the website) and up to 4 SD (or 2 HD) shows can be recorded at once. Any box can watch any recorded content. I can start watching a recorded show in the living room, pause it and turn off the tv/uverse box, go into my room and resume right where I left off. My roommate could go into the living room and start watching the same recorded show from the beginning at the same time if he wanted.

    I have never seen such a well designed, easy to use, feature packed cable system. If you can, check out AT&T's U-Verse! I don't even run my tv tuner card anymore. I used to use vista ultimate's media center . . . I still do, but just for instant streaming netflix. For my tv viewing, I only use U-Verse now.

  127. Make a giant RAID PVR then rip everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget about different formats, incompatibilities, clunky or faulty DVD drives etc. Just rip the damn movie as soon as it enters into your house and store it into a big disk array. Today hard drives are cheaper and much safer than DVDR-s, a RAID1 array will safely store hundreds of movies. Then it's just a matter of what player do you like most, for me it's Freevo/mplayer but MythTV has its advantages too.

  128. Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under Windows I use a freeware prog called GB PVR
    Plays all my media (audio/video)
    allows me to record HD/SD programs (marks advert breaks for me)
    I can set recordings while out by using the web interface.

  129. Netflix + HD Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The HD Tivo along with the associated HME software does it all. There is free software available such as pyTivo, Galleon, streambaby, hme-vlc etc., Netflix is great on an HD tivo, especially since they now incorporated it into the Tivo search function so when you search for something and Netflix has it all you do is click to play it. You also have access to Blockbuster, Amazon, Rhapsody and far too many more to list. You can tie in your personal web cams (via Galleon) to see what is going on outside, heck, even Youtube is fun on a HD Tivo. Tivo plays many formats so there is no reason to change them , just stream them it. The best part is how easy it all works together. There is a reason why many people call any dvr a "Tivo" as the Tivo is the one that sets the standard. HD Tivo and Netflix and a good network connection will give you most everything your family may want to watch. I like the idea of MythTv and may put one together just for the fun of it but for serious viewing pleasure, nothing beats a Tivo.

  130. Windows 7 Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 7 Media Center has the most refined, polished, feature rich, reliable, and wife-accepatable experience of anything I have ever used - including Tivo.
    You can use the remote for everything - and it just works.
    Your Cable Box - Ditch it, and hopefully your cable provider (like mine Cox in Phoenix, AZ) has QAM channels (Works Fantastic!).
    If not, CableCard Slots are in the pipeline.

    Dear Microsoft, Take your unrealized "Windows Home Server" product, throw in a couple Cable Card slots, a remote, a TV Tuner, and sell it to people as a Tivo without a subscription. Allow all the current WHS features, and also the ability to be a Tivo. Allow adding more TVs with Media Center Extenders (Xbox etc).
     

  131. I can mention the worst - Power Cinema by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Power Cinema is the biggest crap ever.
    Slow, buggy, idiot interface, just barely 2001 quality.

    Cyberlink has made a dodo, cancel it , or make something that outshines Myth.

    Ironically, MediaPortal has many things that are better, but still sucks. Its slower than dhtml javascript interfaces.
    They should have just written the interface in flash and have it use xml to communicate to the TV Server.

    And they all have poor analogue support (svideo for sattv), either crap interface, or nothing works.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  132. RSS by angelbunny · · Score: 1

    My solution is a bit cheaper and arguably immoral.

    What I do is setup an RSS feed to the TV shows I like and have them auto download. From there I watch everything on my TV/Computer/... all 720p and all drm free so I can do whatever I want with it. Also, most come in before the shows actually air here.

    It isn't that I'm not paying for Cable TV, because I am. I'm paying for the shows I get. I just don't like the idea of not being able to do what I want to do with the content I'm paying for. Maybe one day cable cards will not be so restrictive and then I'll consider another alternative.

    atm I'm quite happy using RSS to auto download everything I want.

  133. that's not what I read ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    NETFLIX has different streams for different devices as well as different connection rates. A particular stream for one device may be better than one for another. I read the LG BlueRay players are said to have the best overall NETFLIX picture quality, but the HD Tivo has the best overall setup. HD video quality with the HD Tivo is similar Comcast HD quality on a 57" screen TV . Not everything is in HD and even if it is in HD if your connection is running slower at the time they will drop you down to a lesser quality stream. However, if there are any problems with a stream you can easily report it via your queue. Some newer HD TVs have Netflix player capability built in. Not all streams are created equally, some are not good, but most are good to excellent. We also like to copy our rented dvd title to the HD Tivo and watch it via the HD Tivo rather than use the DVD player. HD Tivo does play .vob files so you just need something (in linux) like vobcopy to copy the title to one large file and place it in the Videos directory of your computer so it shows up in the Now Playing section - pyTivo will copy it over, or streambaby will stream it, you can watch it while pyTivo is copying it to the HD Tivo. Some prefer to have vlc stream it directly but I prefer pyTivo and vobcopy.

  134. VDR by mnbjhguyt · · Score: 1

    after 3-4 years of mythtv I found VDR, and it's everything myth is supposed to be.
    if you're using dvb-s/t/c it's perfect, notice that it springs from the linuxtv project itself. it's also super fast, channel switching is faster than my set-top box.
    and if you need grey-area tools to use your legit subscription services there are plenty of tools available, and most of all you can talk about it freely in the forums, as opposed to the mythtv mailing lists.
    for the media player part, I use xbmc

    1. Re:VDR by Anssi55 · · Score: 1

      I concur, having used VDR for 5 years now with DVB-S/T/C. It is fast, lighter, more easily customizable than mythtv and there are lots of plugins available.

    2. Re:VDR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you and me are the only ones on slashdot. Weird. VDR is not that unpopular.

  135. "Since upgrading to new hardware, by smchris · · Score: 1

    I've had issues with sound dropping out;"

    No problem here with MythDora. But somewhere in the Debian Squeeze journey I've acquired an audio drop out or conflict that occurs regularly and periodically. I would suggest you and I have a Debian/Ubuntu problem, not a MythTV problem.
     

  136. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget how poor Flash is on non-Windows boxes. Many streaming websites (e.g. BBC iPlayer) struggle in fullscreen for high bit-rate broadcasts even with decent spec machines.

  137. Mac Mini with Eye TV is the way to go! by migglelon · · Score: 1

    Get a Mac Mini with EyeTV (e.g. get an EyeTV Hybrid). That's the best combo ever. Works as a great DVR. You also have a full computer, can surf the web, etc. You can launch Firefox and play Netflix no problem, do it all of the time. Has front row which is awesome, you can simply launch iTunes and play movies, TV shows, etc. And the best part is you are up and running from day 1, nothing to configure, the software just works and is intuitive. The apple remote is fine for a lot of things but I also recommend a Logitech diNovo Edge keyboard. You want a bluetooth keyboard. Other wireless keyboards don't have the range, you can't sit on your couch on the other side of the room and control things, but bluetooth keyboards can work at that distance no problem.

    1. Re:Mac Mini with Eye TV is the way to go! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I have an IR keyboard (Logitech) and it works fine from the couch. It seems to have at least as good, if not better, range than the remote that came with the TV.

  138. Damn right! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Yep, and worse, it's basically just replicating the functionality of Flash - the very last thing we need is ANOTHER Flash-like system. We're on the verge of finally doing away with Flash and it's ilk with HTML5, and MS releases a proprietary Flash clone and sneaks it onto Windows PCs as an update. Netflix and many MS sites switch from Flash to Silverlight (or at least add Silverlight content) and Average Joe Windows User doesn't even notice the difference...until he tries Linux (or MacOS/BSD/anything else) and ZOMG THIS DOESN'T WORK! (because the non-Windows versions are always going to be kept a few steps behind, and will always have some little quirks so things don't always work) And he runs back to Microsoft's teat.

    Silverlight/Moonlight is such a big, awful trap it makes C#/Mono look like a very minor issue, but things probably won't look so grim when the major browsers have mature HTML5 support (hopefully with open codecs!) - proprietary tech on the web only flourishes where there isn't a good, widely supported open option. I expect that after a while Silverlight will only be found on the sites of MS and their bedfellows, and eventually MS may give up on Silverlight and try to do the 3 Es on HTML5...but with Google dropping Gears in favor of HTML5 (hooray!) that would mean losing ChromeOS and Android users on their web sites/apps...so the chances of this awful trap being safely disarmed are actually pretty good.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  139. Try changing the priority of MythTV by bradbury · · Score: 1

    I've noticed similar problems (sound drops in alsaplayer, javascript timeouts in chromium, etc.) -- particularly if anything else is running (even at nice -19). This can somewhat be helped by running alsaplayer with the "--realtime" option. I've glanced at the code and it doesn't do everything right (it tries to lock the entire program (and presumably all of the sound drivers (which it may not need) into memory and it does setup the process scheduling for realtime scheduling. I do not know if mythtv tries to do similar things, but if you are going to run "realtime" programs trying to at least consider these aspects. If mythtv is competing as a "normal" process with those which are running under Linux then you will see this type of behavior. You might try using "chrt" with "--fifo" scheduling and try bumping the priority up to see if it runs better. Be advised -- its a good idea to have a root shell handy that runs at the highest priority available (which can vary depending on your system and how the per-user priority allowances are setup) so if something runs amok you can kill it without having to reboot the system. You may have to chrt the various myth processes if its running a multi-process model rather than a multi-thread model (chromium has the option of running several models).

  140. Windows 7 Media Center is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to say, but Windows Media Center is by far the best PVR available. It'll handle OTA, Cable, Netflix, Movie collections, etc. The Windows 7 Media Center is worth the upgrade cost to Windows 7 alone. I tried Sage TV and MythTV, but they don't even come close. The best part about Media Center is that it is very user friendly. It passes the wife and kids test. Lastly, if you are worried about Netflix quality then get an Xbox 360 and use it for Netflix and as an extender for media center. Works great for me.

    1. Re:Windows 7 Media Center is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, you're missing a very useful tidbit of information: Windows 7 corporate comes with MCE built in too.

  141. VDR by hoover · · Score: 1

    I've been using vdr for years now and am very happy with it (small, stable, tons of plugins available). Check out the c't vdr project which has vdr at the centre (obviously) and comes with many of the more popular plugins already pre-installed.

    --
    Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
  142. Question... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    It uses a Fedora 9 distro, and dependency hell was dealt with smoothly by running yum.

    Do you notice yum having a tendency to break its own repos regularly after updates? I'm having this problem at work and it's really pissing me off, it seems to be pretty common (this is on CentOS 5.2 servers, from a little searching I see the problem is also common with Fedora). I also had a problem where it wasn't parsing a variable in the repo config files. Plus it's inconsistent - repo configs that work on one server don't work on another virtually identical one (cloned from the first). I'm actually thinking of switching some servers to a "server-ized" (X)Ubuntu Desktop install. Apt doesn't give me any trouble at home, AppArmor's awesome and gksudo would make things much easier for the textophobic admins (a major issue). Losing Red Hat binary compatibility would be the only real downside...

    More on-topic, I've been thinking of doing a setup like yours but I haven't been able to free up the hardware - I'm using a P3 box with Samba shares (I use a directory full of symlinks so I can have files on different disks etc. and still have a tidy "media library" - that was a total bitch to get working) and once you access the files with VLC anything plays. Works great for me, but even if I upgraded the server's hardware, added a tuner and used a dedicated HTPC on the TV it wouldn't be a super-elegant system. I've been thinking of using uPnP to stream media since more devices support it (I'm getting an N900 and Samba support isn't a sure thing). Do you have issues with any file formats via uPnP? From the little research I've done it looks like some transcoding is involved. My videos are in all different weird formats - there's a little of everything (even ripped DVDs as directories), and I need subtitle support too.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  143. Nothing comes close to MythTV feature wise. by zenyu · · Score: 1

    You need to be specific about what you actually need in a PVR for anyone to intelligently recommend an alternative for you. The most painless is probably TiVo. Something less feature rich but still configurable would be SageTV and GB-PVR. Easy to set up but probably lacking too many features you crave after using MythTV would be Microsoft's MCE, included in some versions of Windows 7. AFAIK none have time-stretch as so they don't appeal to me, and none allow you to have as many recording devices, nor can they schedule your recordings as well.

    Your MythTV problems can probably be fixed with significantly less pain than switching to any of the alternatives. For the sound problem uninstall pulseaudio. For the DVD problem there is nothing wrong with using Xine or Ogle, there is a reason MythTV can be configured to use external DVD players. There are a number of LIRC configs out there that map your keys so that this is fairly seamless they are configured by default in MythTV distros. For NetFlix streaming get a Roku box or PS3 and use the input switching on your TV; a PS3 can actually see MythTV recordings and play them as well.

    PS I may be biased as a long time user and some time contributor to MythTV. But I am also well aware of it's warts and have given other PVR options a chance. One thing I have not tried is using XBMC as a frontend for MythTV, I just couldn't get that software installed when I attempted to try it.

    PS2 One of the main tasks for 0.23 is to speed up and fix regressions in the mythfrontend UI. Also, simplifying the configuration of audio in general and adding pulseaudio support is being actively worked on.

  144. Interesting... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's non-free ($40US) Windows-only software but it serves NetFlix over your LAN via DLNA/uPnP...

    http://www.playon.tv/playon/how-it-works

    A tidy, secure-ish and affordable (if you use XP) solution might be to install it on a Windows VM running on your Linux server...one box still does all the serving and if the Windows VM gets pwned, you just bring it back from a backup in minutes. The VM will have a separate IP via its virtual network adapter so it shouldn't conflict with the host box. DRM might be an issue too but this could be a workable solution if you really want NetFlix in a non-Windows environment...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Interesting... by Kildjean · · Score: 1

      It serves netflix, hulu and a bunch others...

      --
      Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
  145. WMC Kicking Apple's Ass? by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    All of these votes for Windows Media Center. Seems like Microsoft is doing it all, in software, while Apple is running a distant 2nd or 3rd with an integrated hardware/software solution.

  146. GBPvr by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

    I use GBPvr(free). It is windows based, and "just works." For difficulty of setup I would put it at about a 3, compared to MythTv's 11. Most of the issues I had were RTFM type things, and the forums are good.

    I have two older analog Hauppage 250 cards, so my setup is not HD. Most of what we watch comes from Hulu or netflix so it isn't a priority. If I spend the $ on better cards it will be. I subscribe to a 3rd party service (paid, $20/yr.) for TV listing information. In the main menu I created shortcuts to NetFlix and Hulu, and I was able to set VLC as the player for DVDs. Using a plugin, Fceux, and a pair of USB gamepads, it also serves as our gaming machine.

    All of the content and configuration is stored on the filesystem, and by sharing the directories I am able to stream to my laptop across wireless. For Christmas I've asked for another machine and an LCD to replace the TV/DVD in our bedroom. I have not tried streaming across the internet a la slingbox and I assume it wouldn't work as-is because of inefficiencies in the windows share protocol. That said, I can play the recorded files in VLC on another machine, so presumably I could ftp/scp them off if I'm ever bored.

    hth,
    ellie

  147. Pretty Happy with Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been using Myth for years, happy with it. It takes a while to set up, and due to dependancies typically have to upgrade OS and all when a desired new feature comes out. It typically takes quite a bit of tweaking, but it can stream HD (up to 720) to the Netbook that I use as a front end (up to today when an Acer Dual Core nettop I ordered shows up).

    The transition to digital capture was hard, especially finding the HD stations. Using Fusion HDTV7 and that may be part of the station discovery issue but also tried a Hauppage capture card which was equally difficult.
    Making the backend sleep and wake up was hard, needed all my own scripts rather than the canned way.
    When the cable company encrypts the QAM it sends me and I have to add their little cable box, put my analog capture card back in and figure out and program the IR blaster it will be a pain too. I'm hoping somebody comes up with a hack to decrypt the stream, these free cable adapters Comcast sent out supposedly have very limited encryption capabilities, that one's not Myth's fault though. Luckily I mostly watch the HD versions of the broadcast channels and only a few cable things (which I stuck with standard def for).

    Myth is far from install and go - not for the casual user, but typically once I have it running I never have to touch it again unless moving to new HW or a new version, looking for a new feature.

    The database of previously recorded programs is a lock in for me. I investigated other PVR SW but didn't find any that could import a myth database or that had a mechanism where I could extract the programs from the Myth database, massage them to some format, and then import them. Does anybody know of a way to import a myth recorded shows database into another PVR?

  148. Plex and MythTV on a Mac by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    MythTV, especially v0.22, is really an awesome DVR but I agree it doesn't do a great job of providing the rest of the media center experience. I've been happy, though, using Plex media center and Myth on a Mac Mini, which of course has no problem with DVDs. (Blu-ray is a thornier issue).

    You can read a little more about my setup and experiences here.

    I think the real modern tragedy is the encrypted channels on cable and satellite: no decent HD PVR solution is possible any longer for these media. My solution was to fire the satellite company and go broadcast only.

  149. Windows 7 + custom Web App by Stregano · · Score: 0

    I currently use Windows 7 for Media Center and a custom web application that I wrote for "grabbing" streaming movies and tv from places like Hulu. It has worked great for me so far. I just used Silverlight (yeah yeah, I know), and wrote a web app that can crawl the big name streaming video sites and get the video out of it and embed it in a web page created on the fly within silverlight, and then it will automatically go to full screen mode to have a TV like effect. It is not 100% perfect, but works well.

    --
    The world is how you make it
  150. EyeTV on a Mac by Proteus · · Score: 1
    I've really been pleased with my media center setup; and my doddering mother-in-law has no difficulties with it either.

    I use:

    1. Elgato's EyeTV software, with an Elgato USB tuner card (supports ATSC, ClearQAM, so tunes HD cable channels and FTA HDTV). This gives me my DVR, which dumps ATSC video at full quality without even re-encoding (std. MPEG-2 stream)
    2. FrontRow, which comes with the Mac, to watch DVDs and my media library, including music. Supports anything you can get a QuickTime plugin for (which is almost anything now, even Theora), and can browse media as files *or* in iTunes
    3. Handbrake 0.94 (64bit) for ripping DVDs to media collection. Dealing with encrypted DVDs is made possible through VLC and Fairmount (more or less transparently - again, my mother-in-law does this).

    Other than paying $600 for the Mac Mini itself, the only cost to this was the EyeTV tuner (which came with the DVR software). Very pleased with this, much better IMHO than my Media Center and MythTV experiences. I've also played with Boxee on OS X, which does everything pretty well, including netflix/hulu streaming. Very nice, though definitely still beta. At least they seem to be making better progress fixing bugs than the Myth folks.

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  151. concur by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    while eyetv has issues (most annoying is watching the head of a currently-recording show: @ the end of the recording, your playback gets terminated)-: it works almost as well as tivo;-)

    i also use vDVHS, from apple's f/w sdk, to rec/pb on a samsung hd tuner...the ffwd button jumps 30s:-) (or used to: recent recordings don't properly populate the neccessary .tsnavi sidecar files)-:

  152. Another MCE vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Media Center with XP, Vista or Windows 7. I ran Beyond TV for Windows for a very long time as it was more robust and reliable than MythTV, as well as being more intuitive for non-technically inclined users (read: My wife did not like MythTV).

  153. 4got2mention... by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    eyeTV & vDVHS are applescriptable:-)

  154. GB-PVR by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

    I've tried A LOT of PVR software over the years, and MythTV (via Mythbuntu) is what I'm currently using. That said, if you're looking for a Windows solution to run under XP, I found GB-PVR to be about an excellent choice. There are a ton of plugins available as well, so I'd say it is at least as full-featured as MythTV. If you insist on running Windows on your PVR, you could do much worse.

    *disclaimer* I've not tried Media Center under Windows 7. I did try it under Vista and found it somewhat lacking.

  155. MythTV too complex for normal users by WindShadow · · Score: 1

    I know a group of users who have been using xawtv for several years on Fedora Core 4. Now they want to update the desktop and need a new viewer/DVR which works with their new hardware (Happage USB and dual input PCI cards). The backend stuff for MythTV stopped them, they don't want to take over running a database, having a trained DBA, etc, etc.

    Can't find anything any simpler for Linux, I think they're going back to Windows next year, because video is a requirement. Watching normal TV is a bonus, of course. Local cable has NTSC analog and clear QAM digital, internal is S-video. The old setup did the analog and S-video just fine, HDTV is a "nice but not required" at this point. Too many "experts only" software, nothing, even commercial, for end users.