Slashdot Mirror


How the Internet Is Changing Language

Ant writes "BBC News reports on how the internet is changing language. What was once understandable only to the tech savvy has become common. From the article: 'To Google' has become a universally understood verb and many countries are developing their own Internet slang. But is the Web changing language and is everyone up to speed?'"

295 comments

  1. LOL by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Funny

    LOL.

    And yeah, I've heard people say it IRL. I've also heard people say IRL IRL.

    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did u tak him 2 da bar|?

    2. Re:LOL by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've found myself using those face-to-face...among others (O RLY, variations of LOLcat speak, WTF)...it's rather scary how much these little routine things we use, more or less to save time, can permeate the corporeal world.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    3. Re:LOL by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      My favourite was a m8 who got into a scrapup and he called it rlpvp

    4. Re:LOL by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "WTF" ends up particularly charming IRL, IMHO...though YMMV.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:LOL by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Whenever I hear someone attempt to pronounce "LOL" it always makes me cringe. It always reminds me of Jeremy from Pure Pwnage (and his "LUL!"), which immediately paints the person as a colossal idiot. Sadly it's usually pretty accurate too.

    6. Re:LOL by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Yeah I've heard people say LOL too. What made me cringe is when something was REALLY funny, so instead of laughing, they actually went "Loooooooooooool", holding a pause on the o sound during pronouciation.

    7. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      wiki snip: Lol is a Dutch word (not an acronym) which, coincidentally, means "fun" ("lollig" means "funny").
      so don't blame us.

    8. Re:LOL by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      "WTF" ends up particularly charming IRL, IMHO...though YMMV.

      lol whats "charming"? liek uber?

    9. Re:LOL by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yes, heard in several places like at work (male, 27) and gf of my friend (female, 24) and her friends too. First off it seems you can use the word more - if you actually laughed out loud as often you'd seem rather manic. Also I've noted they manage to use it as an emotional state like sad, happy etc. for being either amused or finding something silly. Or as an interjection like "The boss said so, lol, but I just did it anyway."

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:LOL by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 0

      One of my years in secondary school was a vocational year called "ICT"(Information Communication yada yada).

      Didn't get much out of it.

      What i did get was retarded CS gamers as classmates, and i swear the incesant "llOOOOooL"(verbatim) nearly drove me to sock 'em.

      --
      My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
    11. Re:LOL by somersault · · Score: 1

      I always think it sounds lame. It's rather cumbersome - 5 syllables instead of the three. Plus when I see WTF I don't see it as the letters, I read it as "what the fuck?" anyway. With something like "lol" I just read it as its own word now, it doesn't mean laugh out loud anymore, it's more of a "I know what I'm saying is kinda lame but I hope you don't mind"

      PS lol

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save me Jeebus!

    13. Re:LOL by RulerOf · · Score: 2, Funny

      My uncle and I were talking once and he wanted to be discreet, so he said "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot."

      ....which kinda made me LOL.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    14. Re:LOL by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      i swear the incesant "llOOOOooL"(verbatim) nearly drove me to wtfpwn 'em.

      Fixed that for ya ;)

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    15. Re:LOL by cgpirre · · Score: 1

      I hear it quite often in Dutch, where WTF is also just 3 syllables. I read it as 'wtf' most times too, even in English sentences. LOL is used sometimes irl too, but most people seem to think it's an actual word ('lol' = Dutch for 'fun').

    16. Re:LOL by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but it's all cringeworthy. When you start spelling your emotions, you should seek counseling. I have a home schooled friend who used to do that. There are some things friends shouldn't let friends do. This is one of them...

      He now laughs like a normal person, and may even have a date in the near future. There is always hope...

    17. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol is a perfectly normal Dutch word. It means fun, ironically.

    18. Re:LOL by prodevel · · Score: 1

      Ever since those annoying ads permeated the radio and television in the early '90s stating, just type into your browser address field: h-t-t-p-colon-foward slash-forward.... I had gotten used to 'go to dub dub dub dot yahoo dot com.'

      So WTF is dub tee eff for me. 3 syllables.

      Also say bang for !, et al.

    19. Re:LOL by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Try saying ROFLMAO out loud, you sound like a pissed cat.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:LOL by Kensai7 · · Score: 1

      ....which kinda made me LOL.

      You mean... Lima Oscar Lima, right?! :p

      --
      "Sum Ergo Cogito"
    21. Re:LOL by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      My uncle and I were talking once and he wanted to be discreet, so he said "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot."

      Yeah, I've used that trick when I don't want to swear in public as well (though I'd never say "WTF"), I've used it typed for emphasis on message boards as well as in Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot. where it seems to carry more weight than a simple WTF on it's own.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    22. Re:LOL by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      I regularly say "teh" instead of "the" when speaking as a way to emphasis the word, so instead of "This is Thee Book to read" I say "This is teh book to read". It started as a joke but has become a bad habit I guess...

      I also spontaneously burst out "TEH NOM!" when I taste good food.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    23. Re:LOL by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      That's brilliant! I am now going to start expanding acronyms using the phonetic alphabet.

      Zulu Oscar Mike Golf! Romeo Oscar Foxtrot Lima!

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    24. Re:LOL by minasoko · · Score: 3, Funny

      I regularly say "teh" instead of "the" when speaking...

      Looking at your id, I'm expecting that most people you speak to mistake this behaviour for dementia.

    25. Re:LOL by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I've heard people write or say "LOL" in place of normal punctuation. Even when something isn't even mildy amusing, or perhaps it's even horrific, it's used in place of periods. "OMG I got beat up @ school today LOL it was awful LOL I cried for hours LOL"

    26. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg so randum xd

      People like you are incredibly annoying.

    27. Re:LOL by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      American pissed, or British pissed?

      British pissed would be "ROFL-hiccup-MAO", American pissed would be "ROFLMAO-dammit!"

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    28. Re:LOL by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Try saying ROFLMAO out loud, you sound like a pissed cat.

      Actually, I used to have coworkers that would say ROFL ("Roffle"). They'd never add the MAO, though, probably for the reason you cite.

    29. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL that sounds like fun!

    30. Re:LOL by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      How do you pronounce "o rly"? I occasionally find myself saying "oh really", while thinking "o rly"... but the "rly" doesn't come off my toungue so well. Is it something like "o arrrlee"?

    31. Re:LOL by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      Actually, in hindsight, I don't wanna know. I'm already embarassed when I accidentally say "lol".

    32. Re:LOL by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      It's truly terrible.
      However, I did once find myself on the headset with a bunch of friends, playing WoW. Someone said something funny, and I laughed. When I was done laughing, I instinctively pressed my push-to-talk button, and said "lol". And then I was like, "I did NOT just say that". Given the context though, and that I actually DID laugh out loud, I think I may be excused.

    33. Re:LOL by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I've grown sick of abbreviations ever since I started working for the military. Mainly because I got tired of asking, "SM-2? What's that? TASM? Oh you mean a Tomahawk. What the heck does COTS mean?"

      I've made it my own personal rule to never use abbreviations, because they block communication.
      Instead of "I LOLed," I'll say, "I laughed out loud."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    34. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I was at this bar once and we were all joking about things. This one hot chick was with us and everyone would be laughing and she was like "Oh LOL".

    35. Re:LOL by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      And yeah, I've heard people say it IRL. I've also heard people say IRL IRL.

      And the first time in my life I thought teenagers should be tested and culled was when I heard one say "lololol". As if "lol" wasn't bad enough.

    36. Re:LOL by delinear · · Score: 1

      My circle of friends found ourselves doing this back in the 90's in the days when usenet and IRC were the Facebook and Twitter of the era. It began as a gag by phonetically spelling out how we'd say the words in a real world context (for instance "roflmao" would be "roffle mayo" or even "roffle with mayo" if we were feeling extravagent) but then we found them creeping into everyday usage which was incredibly weird at the time (when most people would look blank when they encountered a typed "lol" or emoticon). Nom I use all teh time, though.

    37. Re:LOL by delinear · · Score: 1

      We used to phonetically write it as "roffle mayo", as it made it sound like a fun sandwich filling rather than a goofy communist dictator.

    38. Re:LOL by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I was like

      That construction is as heinous as any other mentioned in this discussion, though it originated elsewhere.

    39. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done that to, doesn't help that "lol" is actually a word in my native tongue (http://translate.google.com/#nl|en|lol)

    40. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SRSLY?

    41. Re:LOL by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I've also heard people say IRL IRL.

      What's fun is when you're discussing a racing game. "You can choose to race in the IRL" "Um, I bought the game because I want to race fake Indy Cars, not real ones." "Not the IRL IRL, the in game IRL." "Oh!"

    42. Re:LOL by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's 3 in my place. 'W" is pronounced, also when separate, like a voiced "F" (though only my "F" (I think...), the closest would be probably EN voiced "V" but ending not in "-e" - more like "-y" (I think...); "V" is indeed hardly used - current version of local alphabet doesn't have it, even if it was present historically & it shows up due to influx of foreign vocabulary (where such letters are typically transformed over time to the ones in alphabet; there's no need for them / they can be perfectly represented)) or, more typically and when pronouncing "wtf" - like the first sound in voodoo, but short. And generally very close to how Latin is pronounced, supposedly.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    43. Re:LOL by nacturation · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      And yeah, I've heard people say it IRL. I've also heard people say IRL IRL.

      And the first time in my life I thought teenagers should be tested and culled was when I heard one say "lololol". As if "lol" wasn't bad enough.

      Ah yes... the classic "laughing out loud out loud out loud".

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    44. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a contraction is a form of abbreviation, and you said "I'll" and "I've", and not "I will" and "I have".

    45. Re:LOL by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 0

      Perhaps anyone can help: I'm looking for an on-line comic that made a joke about this.

      Conversation between two guys, one use "LOL" as a response and then asks something like "Did I just say that?". The punchline is that the other guy says "You're losing it IMHO."

      Does anyone know which comic that was?

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
  2. New additin to Dictionary by rossdee · · Score: 1

    First Post becomes common

  3. No. by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "[...] is everyone up to speed?"

    No. That's the whole point of slang - you use it to show that you belong in a specific subgroup. If everyone is "up to speed" on some slang it no longer works as slang. Everyone who wants to show subgroup membership (and that's everybody, pretty much) will start using other new words and expressions instead.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:No. by sznupi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is how it ceases to be a slang... And on a quite global scale, enabling unprecended level of direct interboundary (interocean even) communication - the very act of which is what has always shaped languages. But rarely among so diverse people (and, face it, with not terribly impressive / solid familiarity with the languges they use; vide this post...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:No. by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "And on a quite global scale, enabling unprecended level of direct interboundary (interocean even) communication"

      Not as much as many native English speakers seem to want to think. Most people here in Japan, including academics and other well-educated professionals, never visit non-Japanese language websites - or if they do (some social websites or similar), only the subset that is in Japanese. And this is generally true even when their English proficiency is quite good. I saw similar behavior (though to a lesser extent) in my native Sweden some years ago.

      "Language globalization" or not, the vast majority of people around the world are most comfortable communicating in their own language, with people largely sharing their own culture. We don't really have one internet as much as a number of separate, semi-permeable internets, each with their own language, culture, trends and memes but with some high-profile stuff "leaking" between them. We may superficially seem as we're sharing the same online culture, but for every runaway meme shared by the world, you have tens, hundreds that never go beyond the particular internet where it was born.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:No. by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      "[...] is everyone up to speed?"

      No. That's the whole point of slang - you use it to show that you belong in a specific subgroup. If everyone is "up to speed" on some slang it no longer works as slang. Everyone who wants to show subgroup membership (and that's everybody, pretty much) will start using other new words and expressions instead.

      what subgroup uses "lawl" in actual speech? Because I wish to slap that group.

    4. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with weird accents who don't pronounce "lol" as "loll".

    5. Re:No. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Correct, although it's worth pointing out the difference between slang and (tech) jargon, also: jargon is used as shortcuts for otherwise long descriptions of specific concepts. (Knowledgable) use of it also shows subgroup, but only as a side effect.

      And, honestly, "to google" and the like are slang, not jargon, and thus the "tech savvy" have nothing to do with it.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    6. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yoo Sveedish, tooz? Bork bork bork.

    7. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't happen to slap them with a large trout would you?

    8. Re:No. by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right right. Real horrorshow malenky like, these vesches are with the slobos. Like to go all ultraviolence on their litsos til the tolchoks make their rots all skorry like. You viddy?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    9. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bork" är faktiskt inte ett ord på svenska, det är däremot av någon anledning "flozz", "ayna", "len", "yallah" och en hög annat hittepå som bara används av ungarna i Stockholmsförorter. Så går det när nollåttorna är rädda för att uppfattas som "rasister" om de inte låtsas som att alla svenska ungdomar lider av allvarliga mentala handikapp.

    10. Re:No. by Espressor · · Score: 1

      Very good point.

      I often have the impression that the Slashdot community is dominated (in forum participation at least) by people who live in English-speaking countries, especially the UK and, obviously, the US. I wonder how true that is. Are there any stats on Slashdot demographics?

      Apologies: I realize this is a bit off-topic.

    11. Re:No. by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      I, too, agree that Japan should share a little less with the world.

    12. Re:No. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      How much of that has to do with not having a keyboard layout or the knowledge of how to make special characters to communicate with?

      My Spanish isn't great, but even if it were, I'd have trouble making special characters on a website where I had to type it. Impossible? Not at all. But it's far easier to stick to the language that my keyboard comes in.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    13. Re:No. by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That depends on if you differentiate between slang and colloquialism. But slang doesn't necessarily have to be a shibboleth, just more common to a particular social group.

    14. Re:No. by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      English, though, doesn't really use special symbols, so I don't think that's an excuse. Most keyboards - whether Spanish, Japanese, Russian, or Thai - should be usable to type basic English with no issue.

      Thai keyboards, which are the only ones from my list I'm familiar with, have the fairly complicated Thai script as the default (a wildly different system from QWERTY), but then they also have QWERTY English letters printed on all the keys. Switching input languages is something everyone knows how to do and which all computers are set up for, and even people with limited English skills (like several Thai people I know) can switch into typing English with no problem.

      Of course this may seem as though I'm implying that the English internet is the one true internet, which obviously isn't true, but it's got to be the largest, and with the most influential content. There's nothing stopping non-native speakers from penetrating the English internet if they're so inclined, and the many non-native speakers here on Slashdot attests to that.

    15. Re:No. by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Of course this may seem as though I'm implying that the English internet is the one true internet, which obviously isn't true, but it's got to be the largest, and with the most influential content.

      This notion has to do more with heritage. The Internet originated in the USA and primarily used the English language and the Roman alphabet. Until IDN came along, domain names were strictly Roman alphabet with no symbols.

      Computing itself is deeply rooted with the Roman alphabet (ASCII charset in particular) due to early US dominance in the industry. That drives some Europeans crazy because that dominance resulted in things like monitor size and printer resolution (dpi) are measured in non-SI units....oh and PC LOAD LETTER anyone?

    16. Re:No. by somaTh · · Score: 1

      This happens all the time at my flibbity flobbity floop.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    17. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it's more like that I was exposed a lot to those words/abbreviations in games, so I have adapted that speech without thinking about it and suddenly it also slips over my tongue in reallife.
      I don't use it to show that I belong to a certain group, it feels just like a normal way of taking and communicating efficiently.

      Tbh, I hate some of the cryptic slang that some chatters use, who deliberately write almost every word of the English language wrong so that I need some time to decypher it. Same with German. I'm actually German. Maybe I'm too old for that.

    18. Re:No. by jafac · · Score: 1

      Yep - our Chinese exchange students promptly logged onto the Chinese version of YouTube, and spent nearly every night watching some stupid Chinese soap-opera.

      Thought you were here to learn English? After the first few days of that (refused to adjust to the time too, so they wouldn't get out of bed for school, at 9am!). . . I "broke" the router - oops, can't get to their site anymore! Bummer. I'll fix it when I have time. Very busy you know.

      Then I really started messing with them. We'd watch English DVDs, and I'd set the subtitles, so they could read-and-listen. But for Twilight, (ha ha, teenage girls), I set them to Spanish. After 10 minutes, the confused looks on their faces! LOL. So I fixed that - and they only made it halfway through the movie. They couldn't figure out the plot (?!).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    19. Re:No. by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide!

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    20. Re:No. by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      i thought the purpose of slang was to communicate ideas that specific to an activity, place or group that the mainstream language didn't have (by inventing new words or reappropriating old words). "The quad" is slang known by college students throughout the US. It's not a matter of showing separation/membership but an easier way of saying "that place in the middle of all the buildings".

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  4. WIBBLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WIBBLE

    1. Re:WIBBLE by sjwt · · Score: 1

      flibble and snoff

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    2. Re:WIBBLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engfeh.

  5. what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    d0 57upid 7r4|\|5147i0|\| 14|\|gu4g35 (0u|\|7?

    1. Re:what about by aquabat · · Score: 2, Funny

      d0 57upid 7r4|\|5147i0|\| 14|\|gu4g35 (0u|\|7?

      \/\/|-|y |\|07?

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    2. Re:what about by ducomputergeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, there is a perl module for that.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    3. Re:what about by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clicked enter for some reason:

      Here is the module: http://search.cpan.org/~jmadler/Acme-LeetSpeak-0.01/lib/Acme/LeetSpeak.pm

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    4. Re:what about by aquabat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      aw, that takes all the fun out of it!

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    5. Re:what about by derGoldstein · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, there is a perl module for that.

      I'm pretty sure that --
      d0 57upid 7r4|\|5147i0|\| 14|\|gu4g35 (0u|\|7?
      is valid perl6. You don't need a module.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    6. Re:what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > perl6 -e'd0 57upid 7r4|\|5147i0|\| 14|\|gu4g35 (0u|\|7?'
      ===SORRY!===
      Confused at line 1, near "d0 57upid "

    7. Re:what about by RulerOf · · Score: 2, Funny

      ===SORRY!===

      Confused at line 1, near "d0 57upid "

      You need to get the lastest nightly build. That code starts a loop that churns out nonstop images from memegenerator.net.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    8. Re:what about by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      d0 57upid 7r4|\|5147i0|\| 14|\|gu4g35 (0u|\|7?

      What do you need a Perl module for? That line ran fine.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    9. Re:what about by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      $ perl
      d0 57upid 7r4|\|5147i0|\| 14|\|gu4g35 (0u|\|7?
      Number found where operator expected at - line 1, near "d0 57"
                      (Do you need to predeclare d0?)
      Bareword found where operator expected at - line 1, near "57upid"
                      (Missing operator before upid?)
      Number found where operator expected at - line 1, near "upid 7"
                      (Do you need to predeclare upid?)
      Bareword found where operator expected at - line 1, near "7r4"
                      (Missing operator before r4?)
      Bareword found where operator expected at - line 1, near "5147i0"
                      (Missing operator before i0?)
      Bareword found where operator expected at - line 1, near "0u"
                      (Missing operator before u?)

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  6. Language changes when people talk to each other by billstewart · · Score: 1

    The Internet lets everybody in the world talk to each other, faster and more flexibly than before. So yes, that's going to change language, because people who would have never talked to each other are doing so, and people who had obscure things to talk about can find other people to talk about them with that they wouldn't have before.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  7. Surely.. by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Funny

    'How teh intartubez are changing how ppl speak' ?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  8. The "Internet"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that thing still around?

    1. Re:The "Internet"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sits on top of the Big Ben.

    2. Re:The "Internet"? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Of course it's still around! It's all tubes, you know.

    3. Re:The "Internet"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That show is anti-lulz

    4. Re:The "Internet"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mistaken. The anti-lulz is Family Guy.

    5. Re:The "Internet"? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I was listening to NPR a couple of weeks ago and one of the 50+ announcers came on during a pledge drive and started the drive off with "O. M. F. G. L. O. L. The phones are ringing off the hook!"

      They had to end that pledge break early. All the 20-somethings couldn't answer the phones, and no one else could speak. All you could hear was laughter, and finally this pained young female voice comes on and says "cut to programming, now please, we can't continue" and Morning Edition starts back up.

      I'm not sure if Charlie really knew what he was saying, but he's good at laughing at himself at least. His laughter was clearly audible in the crowd.

      The next pledge break, you could hear everyone desperately muffling snickers whenever Charlie said anything.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:The "Internet"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact, we have too many Internets.

    7. Re:The "Internet"? by arachnoprobe · · Score: 1

      It's the thing, facebook runs on.

  9. Slashdot by matt007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    back in time : Slashdot = News for nerds, stuff that matters.
    now : Slashdot = Useless stuff, badly reported, just to get clicks.

    1. Re:Slashdot by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      Back then Slashdot was the original /. - with the /. effect.

      Now, slashdot has become a ??

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ??

      ... Profit!

  10. H3Y GUYS by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I FOUND THES N3AT ANGLISH 2 INT3RNAT SP3AK TRANSLA2R!11!!! OMG LOL

    http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    1. Re:H3Y GUYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXC3PT ITS FROM 2005!11111!1! LOL UR JUST NOT UP 2 SPEAD !11!1!! OMG WTF

    2. Re:H3Y GUYS by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      LOL THNGS FROM 205 STIL EXIST DUMBAS

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:H3Y GUYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yebbut theyz soh lam3 u tard

    4. Re:H3Y GUYS by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Well played.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    5. Re:H3Y GUYS by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Well played.

      Wut U sa?

  11. 1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and "Leetspeak" in which some letters are replaced by numbers which stem from programming code.

    Last time I checked, none of my code l00k3d 1ik3 7h15.

    1. Re:1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Modded you insightful, but I realized that I've been using DEADBEEF, C00FEEBABE, FEEDFACE, and other magic numbers in my code.

    2. Re:1337 by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 'magic number' for a Java class file is 0xCAFEBABE.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  12. I are in ur brainz by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... changing ur langwigez!

    1. Re:I are in ur brainz by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      "I r in ur brainz", ffs.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  13. Keyboards by txoof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only has the internet changed the way some people speek, but just the common use of keyboards without the intervention of editing or editors (or thinking, sometimes) has contributed to the way we speak online, and occasionally in real life. A few examples that pop to mind are "borken," a simple transposition of the "r" and "o" in broken-- and of course thanks to the Swedish Chef. That transposition also gave us the incredibly useful word "bork" as well. The transposition "teh" has also crept into usage, usually to show some sort of derision or sarcasm.

    What other transpositions or artifacts of keyboard usage can /. come up with?

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    1. Re:Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a tarp!

    2. Re:Keyboards by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Interesting
      @txoof You've forgotten those #$^& stupid at-signs that people have to use on linear forums

      :) <--- keyboard smiley

    3. Re:Keyboards by comm2k · · Score: 1

      Oh noes...

    4. Re:Keyboards by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      What other transpositions or artifacts of keyboard usage can /. come up with?

      *^#%@#NO CARRIER

      I hate^h^h^h^hlike this

      ITS LIKE SHOUTING

      h tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot dot org

    5. Re:Keyboards by AtomicDog1471 · · Score: 1

      That has nothing to do with keyboards... "O" and "R" are nowhere near each other. Same for "teh", it sounds more to do with mild dyslexia.

      Also... what says "bork" in real life? Come to think of it, who's said "bork" since 1999 anyway?

    6. Re:Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PWN!

    7. Re:Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has more to do with fast typing with both hands

    8. Re:Keyboards by RulerOf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      @martin-boundary naw dude. it's a gazillion times moar convenient to click thru a gazillion pages to read the whole conversation rather than seeing a threaded view. And the character limit is good cau

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    9. Re:Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do letters have to be adjacent for a transposition to occur? Adjacent letters are more likely to be substituted.

    10. Re:Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The verb "to bork" has a different origin.

    11. Re:Keyboards by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Also... what says "bork" in real life? Come to think of it, who's said "bork" since 1999 anyway?

      Robert's family?

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    12. Re:Keyboards by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A few examples that pop to mind are "borken," a simple transposition of the "r" and "o" in broken

      It's a more subtle and humorous thing -- see wikipedia:

      Bork as verb
      According to columnist William Safire, the first published use of bork as a verb was "possibly" The Atlanta Journal-Constitution of August 20, 1987. Safire defines to bork by reference "to the way Democrats savaged Ronald Reagan's nominee, the Appeals Court judge Robert H. Bork, the year before."[22] Perhaps the best known use of the verb to bork occurred in July 1991 at a conference of the National Organization for Women in New York City. Feminist Florynce Kennedy addressed the conference on the importance of defeating the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court. She said, "We're going to bork him. We're going to kill him politically ... This little creep, where did he come from?"[23] Thomas was subsequently confirmed after one of the most divisive confirmation hearings in Supreme Court history.

      In March 2002, the Oxford English Dictionary added an entry for the verb Bork as U.S. political slang, with this definition: "To defame or vilify (a person) systematically, esp. in the mass media, usually with the aim of preventing his or her appointment to public office; to obstruct or thwart (a person) in this way."[24]

      Not only has the internet changed the way some people speek

      It's also changed the way some people "rite".

    13. Re:Keyboards by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      "crub" (instead of curb) is very common after an infamous post on a car forum. People will purposely use it in the phase "I crubbed my rims yo" both posting and speaking.

    14. Re:Keyboards by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      A fan of the Kawf forum software I presume? Its primary view was threaded, many people would just send short replies filling out just the subject.

    15. Re:Keyboards by mrsurb · · Score: 1

      pwned would be one - I've even seen [wned where someone has tried to write pwned but missed.

      Not sure about pr0n - more an obfuscation attempt than a keyboard artefact I suspect.

    16. Re:Keyboards by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      It's also changed the way some people "rite".

      It's a right of passage...

    17. Re:Keyboards by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Not only has the internet changed the way some people speek, but just the common use of keyboards without the intervention of editing or editors (or thinking, sometimes) has contributed to the way we speak online, and occasionally in real life. A few examples that pop to mind are "borken," a simple transposition of the "r" and "o" in broken-- and of course thanks to the Swedish Chef. That transposition also gave us the incredibly useful word "bork" as well.
      IIRC "bork" when used as a verb derives from a certain jackass who managed not to get confirmed to the Supreme Court (of the USA).

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    18. Re:Keyboards by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      What other transpositions or artifacts of keyboard usage can /. come up with?

      ...pron?

      Also, we can thank spammers for such clever constructs as 'v1agra'

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    19. Re:Keyboards by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      USENET. Most newsreaders use threads in a really useful way, as well as score files to determine which messages are visible where by adding/subtracting weights to each one.

      Most web forums are teh suXor when it comes to providing a useful interface for reading. It's pretty, but it's still crappy. :-(

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    20. Re:Keyboards by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Wright on!

  14. Surely you've heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG PONIES

  15. What about television? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Go back 50 years, and you will probably find the same commentary about television. How it was spreading new terms and speech patterns and what not.

    It's funny, though. I tried to Google for articles, posts and blogs about this from 50 years ago, and didn't find anything.

    Were people back 50 years ago too lazy to post crap on the Internet . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:What about television? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O RLY?

      Whoosh

      (...insert other appropriate memes here)

    2. Re:What about television? by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      Can you tell us how people used to "woosh" 50 years ago...?

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    3. Re:What about television? by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      They had jets in the 30s so much so the woosh should have been much the same.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_von_Ohain

    4. Re:What about television? by bronney · · Score: 1

      Whoosh~

    5. Re:What about television? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to understand, it was a lot harder back then. The Internet was hand-crank and you had to walk, uphill both ways, in the snow to get at it. Even in the summer in Florida, where frost-covered alligators had to be contended with. Then, you had to enter the data you wanted to post in Morse code, and use a lowercase "i" to mean "1" and an uppercase O to mean "0". Eventually, IBM invented the hand-crank typewriter, the precursor to the selectric, called the selecrank.

      Anyway, you entered your data and cranked the handle a few dozen times, and it tugged on little strings which were thousands of miles long (the Earth was much bigger then, since there had to be room for all the dinosaurs). At the other end, there was a sheep with the string tied around his testicles, and the pattern of bleats could be heard for miles around.

      Actually, looking at the slashdot forums and all the bleats, not much has changed.

      Baaa!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:What about television? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous because you didn't have access.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    7. Re:What about television? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      And the telephone. Hello was invented as a word to use when one picked up the phone. Bell wanted everyone to say "ahoy", but that didn't catch on.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    8. Re:What about television? by prodevel · · Score: 1

      I can haz cheezberger 50 yeers ahgo?

    9. Re:What about television? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Eventually, IBM invented the hand-crank typewriter, the precursor to the selectric, called the selecrank.

      Actually, I learned to interface with a computer through one of these things:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Teletype_with_papertape_punch_and_reader.jpg

      It had a crisp, clear touch, something like the IBM type M keyboard ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_M_keyboard )

      And for the sysadmin, that big roll of toilette paper behind the keyboard kept a log of what anyone did.

      Sysadmin: "What did you do?"

      Me: "I didn't do nuthin'"

      Sysadmin: "Well, let's take a look at what was printed out here . . . "

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    10. Re:What about television? by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Go back 50 years, and you will probably find the same commentary about television. How it was spreading new terms and speech patterns and what not.

      Funny you mention that, since I just ran across this:

      http://sundaymagazine.org/2010/08/from-1890-the-first-text-messages/

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    11. Re:What about television? by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      At the risk of being serious, factual, and pedantic, you didn't use lowercase "i" for the numeral "1"; you used lowercase "l" (el).

      @anyone thinking this is a joke: It's true. Since it was perfectly obvious from the context whether the character was supposed to be a numeral or an alpha character, many typewriters didn't bother including a separate key for the numerals "0" and "1". For example

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:What about television? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being serious, factual, and pedantic

      No risk, you were all that. But you were also correct. It was a lowercase "L". Thanks for the correction.

      My memory ain't what it used to be.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    13. Re:What about television? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, that newfangled gimcrackery runs on electricity, son. ;)

      Still, cool pic.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    14. Re:What about television? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Oh yes... and how to type an exclamation mark without a "1/!" key? You typed an apostrophe (non-curled), hit backspace (which didn't delete in those days), then typed a period. Or the other way 'round; it didn't matter'^H.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    15. Re:What about television? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      well the BBC is credited with standardising english pronunciation across the UK from the 20's onwards.

    16. Re:What about television? by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Are you stupid ?

      It's well known that 50 years ago, everything was written on papyrus.

    17. Re:What about television? by delinear · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can haz cheezberger 105 years ago!

    18. Re:What about television? by delinear · · Score: 1

      Maybe they averaged out the sharper edges but it's certainly anything but standardised. More likely what they did was have everyone on screen talk in such a watered down version of the local dialect so as not to offend those in the south east that they perpetuated the myth that they standardised pronunciation (even today someone with a heavy Glaswegian accent sounds vastly different to someone with a heavy Yorkshire accent sounds vastly different to someone with a heavy Birmingham accent sounds vastly different to... you get the picture).

    19. Re:What about television? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      well your really talking about dialect here and not what is accepted english - which is what changed with radio and later TV.

      And I suspect that Glaswegians keep the accent for intimidatory effect :-)

      Robbie Coltrain once got menaced by some muggers in NYC and went into a full on Razor Boy Glaswiegian impression - the muggers promptly ran away.

  16. BBC talking about changing language is irony by kaladorn · · Score: 0, Troll

    There are some questions about BBC and the abuse of language its broadcasters seem to engage in.

    BBC : Normal Humans

    Reg you lay toe ree : Regulatory (lah instead of lay)
    Drugs War : Drug War
    Drink Driving : Drunk Driving (or Drinking and Driving)
    Al bee nizm : Albinism (with a pine sound in the middle)
    BBC Sport : I guess they used up there stocks of the letter s on Drugs War
    Sigh rah que suh : Syracuse (with a see sound at the start)
    Aw say kah : Osaka (with an oh sound and then a saw sound)

    The BBC has a tongue firmly in cheeck if they are addressing the changes in language. Surely they do not speak the Englis of the King anymore. Nor that of the Queen. Nor even some unacknowledged bastard, nine degrees removed variant therof.

    I am totally ignoring their pronunciation (or is that pro noun see ae shun?) of various English town names. I assume some of those are at least rooted in antiquity.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Xest · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you from the UK? Some of your suggestions are just plain weird, no one in the UK says "Al-bine-izm" or "drunk driving". "BBC Sport" is a name so I fail to see what's invalid about that.

      The BBC just pronounces things the way their primary audience (i.e. the British public that funds them) speak and expect them to speak. They seem to be using the standard accepted pronunciation that everyone else here in the UK uses.

      I've never heard them say Osaka or Syracuse as they're not words that come up for any reason, but I suspect that's a clue to the fact that you're perhaps not British? If that's the case, then there's the reason you seem to think their pronunciations are abuse of language, rather than the standard accepted pronunciations of British English speaking people.

      I guess it's like how in the UK we generally call Mathematics "maths" rather than "math", and pronounce "route" closer to "root", rather than the common North American pronunciation of "rowt".

      The BBC is just using the pronunciation native to their staff, and that their primary audience- the ones who pay for their existence, the British license payer, would expect.

    2. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you might want to look into your assertions regarding American pronunciations. I don't recall Chuck Berry singing about "rowt" 66. You know how many dialects and accents one will find just in the British Isles? Well, multiply the landmass considerably and you'll see that there are one or two variations here in the colonies.

      That said, your point is pretty much dead on. Why the hell wouldn't the Beeb feature pronunciations that ape the majority of its listeners.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by AtomicDog1471 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you a troll or are you honestly suggesting that the BBC should use "American English"?

      Reg you lay toe ree : This is correct
      Drugs War : This is correct (it's the "War on Drugs")
      Drink Driving : This is fine (ie "Don't drink and drive")
      Al bee nizm : It's pronounced "Albeeno" in Britain
      BBC Sport : What could possibly be wrong with this?
      Sigh rah que suh : Seriously, how often is this word said on the BBC?
      Aw say kah : Same as above

    4. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough they're using the form of English that they speak, namely British English. It wouldn't be fair for me to demand you speak in Scots just because your stupid words make my ears want to cry, would it?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      The BBC just pronounces things the way their primary audience (i.e. the British public that funds them) speak and expect them to speak.

      Well.... I've always thought that the fun thing about the differences in pronunciation make for fun cross cultural flirting, which admittedly is more convenient when you speak the same language.

      A friend of mine spent a month in London, and I asked him, "You know that whole thing about how Americans love hearing people with British accents talk? Does the reverse hold true as well?"

      "Oh yes," he told me. "One of the first things they asked me was, 'to say the name of that metal.' I wasn't sure what they were talking about. 'Oh it's really light. It starts with an A. You know, they build aircraft out of it!' ...You mean aluminum? 'Yes! Aluminium!'" He said there was much giggling by the females, he explained, and I can assure you it wasn't because he's a fellow that frequently makes ladies giggle... :D

      That said, I suppose the point is that pronunciation is what it is. The way people say things, when they're the public norm, is generally the way that things are supposed to be said. The best example I can think of is with the word "forte." If you use the "correct" pronunciation by saying "fort," people are going to look at you like you're an idiot once they figure out that you meant "for-tay."

      Of course, that's not to say I excuse any morons who may have held public office while misleading the public and saying "nucular" into TV cameras for 8 years straight.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    6. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Xest · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend is a Canadian living in the UK and we go back over to see her family and friends quite frequently, so I know what you mean about appreciation of accents, I often get asked to say things when I'm over there which leave them in fits of giggles. Similarly though, I regularly like making my girlfriend say things which she pronounces funny, generally words involving the letters "out" or "old" amuse me the most with that accent.

      In the UK we use the term "fag" to refer to cigarette too, so it's commonly used for that purpose rather than just as a derogatory term for homosexuals. I got a rather funny look when I was in California once and when asking where someone was said "Oh, has he gone outside to smoke a fag?". Obviously in the UK such a sentence is quite harmless, but they seemed under the impression I was querying whether he'd gone to shoot a gay person or something, I think they thought I was part of some neo-nazi organisation for a moment. Fortunately this was at our California office and not in front of a client or anything, although when with clients I try and avoid even British slang like that and stick to proper English anyway.

    7. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by cheesecake23 · · Score: 1

      The best example I can think of is with the word "forte." If you use the "correct" pronunciation by saying "fort," people are going to look at you like you're an idiot once they figure out that you meant "for-tay."

      Er ... "fort" would only be correct if it came from French and was specifically referring to a feminine word. But it was almost certainly imported from Italian (because it is a very common term in music, where Italian is the lingua franca), in which case "fortay" would be much closer to the origin. Even better would be "forteh".

      Anyway, a sufficiently used pronunciation of any word in any language is correct, by definition. "Fortay" is now correct. Live with it.

    8. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      Hmm, never thought about it before, but I use route as 'root' for a noun and route as 'raut' for a verb. I think this is because I've always heard 'router' pronounced as 'rauter'.

    9. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you might want to look into your assertions regarding American pronunciations. I don't recall Chuck Berry singing about "rowt" 66

      I believe the description was 'common' rather than 'universal' or 'normal'.

      Where normal probably includes the following:
      * AlOO m'num (where did the missing syllable go?)
      * Or EGG a-no
      * BAYsil

      etc.

      otoh, there's a good argument that US pronunciation more closely mirrors C16-C18th usage in England. So who's evolved? [/quote source=Night At The Museum]

      Language changes, folks.

      Although apostrophised plural's [sic] and use of 'less than" for ordinal numbers are still wrong. Keep off my lawn (etc)

    10. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      and pronounce "route" closer to "root", rather than the common North American pronunciation of "rowt".

      Actually British English uses both pronunciations, but in completely different contexts. This is a rooter , whereas this is a rowter .

    11. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Espressor · · Score: 1
      After having lived for 7 years in the US, I moved to the UK. I was made fun of because I was saying a "rowt" instead of a "route", obviously influenced by the pronounciation of the word by some Americans (I was living in California before).

      Also, the pronounciation "rowt" is acknowledged by the (excellent) American dictionnary Meriam-Webster.

      Disclaimer: in my native tongue, we say "route" not "rowt", and it's not like I invented the second kind of pronounciation.

      yours truly in Language Nazism.

    12. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Aw say kah : Osaka (with an oh sound and then a saw sound)

      I can't speak for any other part of the BBC (or indeed the country), but BBC Scotland football pundits have a habit of mispronouncing foreign names. Motherwell played away to Ålesund recently, the pronunciation of which varied wildly. And I vaguely remember them completely giving up on Stig Inge Bjørnebye back when he was active.

    13. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Neither of those pronunciations of "albinism" is correct. It's al-buh-niz-uhm. There are certainly correct pronunciations of "Syracuse" and "Osaka" -- ask people who live there.

      Both "rowt" and "root" are common in the US.

    14. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Neither of those pronunciations of "albinism" is correct. It's al-buh-niz-uhm."

      Where? That's certainly not the correct pronunciation in modern British English, but that's really the point- different cultures have different accepted pronunciations.

      "There are certainly correct pronunciations of "Syracuse" and "Osaka" -- ask people who live there."

      Of course, but I was just saying that they're so uncommonly used that I'd have no idea personally how the BBC pronounce them and whether that pronunciation is correct. Even if they do pronounce them incorrectly it's a little easier to excuse incorrect pronunciations of such uncommonly used words anyway than it is more commonly used words and phrases. They're words a reporter may only encounter once or twice in their career anyway rather than something they may repeat over and over incorrectly.

    15. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I hope whoever modded that "troll" used up all his points, because he really sucks at moderating. The parent makes a very good point -- pick up a copy of the King James Bible, or even Shakespeare. It's nothing like we speak today. Language has always evolved, but it's evolving faster with the advent of the internet.

      I used to be a gay hacker but they changed the language, now I'm just a happy nerd.

    16. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Connecticut and i say route as 'root'. I freaking odd when i hear some people say 'rowt' they sound retarded, at least around here.

    17. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Both American and British English dictionaries (e.g., Oxford) use "al-buh-niz-uhm" (or replace the "uh" in "buh" with a schwa). The Mirriam-Webster Medical Dictionary gives the long-I version as an alternate pronunciation.

    18. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just FYI, forte, meaning "strength," comes straight from French and is properly pronounced "fort." Hell, it was originally spelled fort (check your dictionary). Why it was changed to the feminine spelling is a good question and one that my dictionary sadly doesn't explain, it just indicates that it was. But it comes from the French word, which isn't surprising, since something like a third of all English words derive from French words.

      And if you think it's too easy to confuse forte with fort, they're both originally the same word - a place of strength. Forte became "a thing someone does well" and fort became a physical building, but they both derive from the French word "fort."

      Only forte in the musical sense of "loud" is pronounced for-tay.

      Check your dictionary, assuming it contains word etymologies, you might learn something.

    19. Re:BBC talking about changing language is irony by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      no they Just call them "BILLY!" or "Paddy" dependant one which tradition the team is from.

  17. your what you speak. by bronney · · Score: 1

    The single most hacked word is "your" lol. Who started it?

    1. Re:your what you speak. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The single most hacked word is "your" lol. Who started it?

      Which "your" -- your, you're, or yore? My guess is a functional illiterate started it, or perhaps someone whose native language isn't English. But I don't think it's "your", I think "loose" for "lose" is more commonplace, and often changes the meaning of the sentence completely, e.g. "you may loose data" means "you may set data free"; rather than losing data you're loosing it, or in other words, publishing it. The people who do this aren't saying what they think they're saying.

      In times of yore you never saw this kind of illiteracy in print.

      I'd like to know who started using an apostrophe for plurals? Anybody who says "the cat's are out of the bag" really looks like an illiterate idiot to me, and I have a hard time taking him seriously.

  18. Can anyone be really up to date? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been on the online scene since the Fidonet era, circa the 1980's, and I'm still trying to learn new online slangs all the time.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just read the Lolcat Bible:
      http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

      You'll turn the tables and be confusing the kids in no time.

    2. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I've been on the online scene since the Fidonet era, circa the 1980's, and I'm still trying to learn new online slangs all the time.

      I've been online since the CompuServe and BITNET era (mid-80s), and I'm not trying to learn new online slang.
      If those kids want me to understand them, they can use English; and if they don't want me to understand them... good, because I'm really not that interested.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just write in this language:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOLCODE

    4. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>I've been on the online scene since the Fidonet era

      (hug)

      Anyone who mentions Fidonet in the present age deserves a hug. I loved FidoNet and wish I could still access it.

      L8r

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Same here. I read posts here and on other websites until the first occurrence of 'chat5p33k', then skip the rest.

      In MMORPGS, I used to add people who used it to my ignore list, but eventually just wound up leaving chat channels altogether; it was much more efficient.

      Hmm, I can't proofread this post past the 16th word, hope I got it all right :-).

    6. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1
      It may still be possible. I was reading Fido not all that long ago on a local BBS via telnet.

      Link to more information:

      Welcome to FidoNet.org

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    7. Re:Can anyone be really up to date? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      I've been on the online scene since the Fidonet era, circa the 1980's, and I'm still trying to learn new online slangs all the time.

      Why would you? Is it as if the online world is the only one that you belong to and that hence you feel the need to be up-to-date all the time? I myself find new lingo highly interesting and will research when involved. But I shy away from conforming to or even using slang that, to me, portrays the speaker as being too lazy to use proper words and grammar, while still craving the urge to interact with people with an urge to remain "hip".

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  19. Not so much the internet as games by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My eight year old son plays the usual games in the playground but I noticed that it is now possible to pause them. The way it works in you are running around playing Tag or something and somebody says Pause and everything stops. Its a bit like time out in basketball, but for me it is directly derived from the electronic games they play which generally have a Pause function.

    1. Re:Not so much the internet as games by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe the specific usage of the word "pause" is new-ish, but the concept has been there as far back as I can remember, from before I or anybody I knew even knew what the Internet was.

      So long you were playing with people who weren't jerks, you could always request for people to wait a minute while you tie your shoelaces or whatever.

    2. Re:Not so much the internet as games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the term "pause" for the game is new, but the game is old. It was called "freeze" tag back in my day (I was a kid in the '80s).

    3. Re:Not so much the internet as games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GAME OFF!!!

      [...]

      GAME ON!!!

    4. Re:Not so much the internet as games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Not so much the internet as games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used this 15+ years ago.

    6. Re:Not so much the internet as games by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Maybe the specific usage of the word "pause" is new-ish, but the concept has been there as far back as I can remember, from before I or anybody I knew even knew what the Internet was.

      So long you were playing with people who weren't jerks, you could always request for people to wait a minute while you tie your shoelaces or whatever.

      Nobody is asseting that the internet invented time-out (or Al Gore for that matter). He made a comment regarding a story about language. My kids also request "pause" in sports and games, by the way.

      --
      -Dave
    7. Re:Not so much the internet as games by freeweed · · Score: 1

      We played freeze tag in the early 80s, long before video games even HAD a pause function (first one was 1982 that I can think of). My older siblings played it in the 1970s.

      If anything, kids are just expanding that concept and likely incorporating the concept of a "time out", as invented by parents as a form of discipline. Although again "time outs" long pre-date anything remotely modern. Sporting events have had them for ages.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:Not so much the internet as games by Triv · · Score: 1

      what? no.

      Freeze tag is a game where, if you're tagged by whoever's "it," you can't move until somebody else touches you to unfreeze you. Get tagged 3 times and you become it.

      He's talking about using "Pause" to stop the action - untied shoelace, mom's calling, car in the road, whatever. It's synonymous with "Time Out."

    9. Re:Not so much the internet as games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we called it timeout... which was not the same as the newfangled punishment technique.

    10. Re:Not so much the internet as games by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      It's synonymous with "Time Out."

      Thats true but here in Australia time out isn't as commonly understood outside basketball. If I was playing tag and I called time out everybody else would keep playing.

  20. WOW by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    I have never thought languages can change. I thought they talk the way they do since stone age. Honestly. They found out that languages change due to a new innovation which changed the life of many people? The industrial revolution also changed the language of people. They now know what a company is and a factory and in most countries they know what a labor union is and what it is good for.

    But even more astonishing then finding out, that new things influence languages, is the fact that they came up with this result just now. The people know verbs like to google now almost since Google became so popular. And kids use abbreviations very often. So they use LOL as word or IRL or IMHO or BTW. Some of these abbreviations are used in speech and text and other are only present in text form. Almost forgot cu, me 2, and all those SMS shortcuts.

    But now I have to tend to something more important. I heard a rice sack has fallen over. In China. Can you imagine.

  21. To google.. by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Language evolves.. but it still evolves along the same lines and 'rules' as before.
    For instance, we now have "to google" in English, but if you turn that into a French verb, it needs a French verb ending, thus "googler".
    In German you'd need an -n but "googlen" doesn't work, but by transposing the letters you can use the -eln verb ending and so you have "googeln".
    In Swedish, verbs need an -a ending, requiring the 'e' be dropped, so "googla".

    1. Re:To google.. by rzlq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      right, some languages will even use a prefix, like the czech "vygooglit" -- literally "to google out" [as in 'find out'].

    2. Re:To google.. by kumanopuusan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Japanese, verbs often end in ru. guguru (one transliteration of Google) ends in ru and it's used as a verb. With only a handful of exceptions, all Japanese verbs are regular, so once a new verb is coined all of its many forms are used more or less naturally.

      From the verb stem (gugur-) one can derive all the other forms of the verb, including gugureba (if [one] googles), gugutta (googled), gugurimasu (google [polite]) and even gugurikata (googling technique), gugutteirassyaru (to google [exalted]), gugutteitadakereba (if [I] humbly receive the addressee's act of googling), guguritai ([I] want to google) and gugure (google [impolite imperative, similar to "Google it, motherfucker!"]).

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    3. Re:To google.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, gugutteitadakereba is closer to "if [I] may humbly receive the [addressee's] act of googling."

    4. Re:To google.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The worst, I've found, in Spanish is "wikipedear". I've noted that these neologisms (googlear, wikipediar etc.) only get used in the participle or gerund, never as the usual first/second/third person etc. conjugations (you see things like "Lo he googleado..." but never "lo googlearé" etc.

      Interestingly, "cederrón" - which means CD-ROM - is actually in the Diccionario de la Real Academia Española ( http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltConsulta?TIPO_BUS=3&LEMA=cederr%C3%B3n, so long as slashdot doesn't butcher the URL)

    5. Re:To google.. by migla · · Score: 1

      ...and in Finland, the verb would be "googlata". Many finns never learn to pronounce g, though, so they'd pronounce it with k-sounds instead.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    6. Re:To google.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the French Have allowed the word 'Google' into their sacred Francais? Mon Dieur Heresey!

    7. Re:To google.. by locallyunscene · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your gugurikata is impressive, but it is no match for my google-fu.

    8. Re:To google.. by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      What parent fails to mention is that since Japanese verbs are so regular, the language is incredibly resistant to forming new verbs at all. Instead, they borrow the noun and add the verb for "to do" on the end. The fact that "guguru" made it to verb status is due to both luck (it ends in an u) and the sheer force of Google's influence.

      Now, my Japanese is far too rusty to figure this one out, but which form would you use to get the meaning "Here, let me Google that for you..." gugusaserareru?

    9. Re:To google.. by supermariosd · · Score: 1

      Gugusasete kudasai (maybe guguresasete).
      Although I don't think people would use that as much as the translation for "Just fucking Google it."

    10. Re:To google.. by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1
      It's not so much that it's difficult to form new verbs in Japanese, it's that some words sound like verbs and some words don't. Almost all Japanese verbs end in -u, so unless the word, or a likely contraction of it, ends in -u, then it sounds unnatural when used as a verb. For words that sound right, their conjugations are generally intuitive to both the speaker and the listener. There are many such words in common use.

      "Here, let me Google that for you..."

      Gugurasete is allow/cause [someone] to google and gugutteageru is [I] google for [someone]. However, I think gugutteagemasyou (Why don't I google that for you?) is closer in meaning. Here, let me Google that for you...

      gugusaserareru

      Technically, guguru is a godan verb in the ra row. Wiktionary has a good list of conjugations here.

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    11. Re:To google.. by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      English is currently evolving faster than any language has ever done before. And that is because it is the dominant language on the Internet.

      Here are some interesting things to think about:

      • The number of people who are proficient in English as a second language (ESLers) is now greater than the total number of native English speakers (NESers) in the world. It is likely to soon exceed the total number of native English speakers who have ever lived.
      • The number of written exchanges in English that involve at least one ESLer now exceeds exchanges between NESers.
      • The number of exchanges in English that involve only ESLers will soon exceed the number of exchanges where there is an NESer participating.
      • It is now common for persons separated by geography and native language barriers to cooperate on developing intellectual property, such as software. When someone from Finland, someone from Argentina, and someone from Japan decide to cooperate on a project, they will use English as their project language, even though none of them are NESers.
      • You look at the support forums for any of the international projects-- MySQL, Apache, Linux, Blender, Joomla, the various wikis, etc-- and you see a huge number of requests and answers written in "bad" English. Except it is not bad English: standards have changed and so long as you can make yourself understood, nobody gives an RA about spelling, punctuation, grammar.

      This is a tremendous influx of foreign influences into English, and striking directly at the very core of the literate communities. Expect to see the language bent and reshaped during your lifetime. It won't break; English has proven itself to be too resilient to get borked by this kind of thing. But it will get bent in some really wild ways, for instance, the verbing of nouns will become so commonplace that the grammarians will need to figure out what the rules for that are. In English, grammar, spelling, and punctuation "rules" have always followed from accepted usage; they have never dictated what is acceptable.

      So basically I think TFA has missed the big story as it focuses on the small potatoes of Internet jargons. Mai teh toobz bee wid ya, nao n 4evah moah!

      --
      Will
    12. Re:To google.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not bringing anything interesting to the conversation but I think we would say 'googleiser' in French

    13. Re:To google.. by Vadim+Grinshpun · · Score: 1

      similarly in Russian -- "poguglit'" (effectively, "to google around"). I've not heard "vyguglit'" used yet, but it'd work as well :)

    14. Re:To google.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the same rules. The difference is language evolves faster now that we have more freedom of expression and sharing through internet. It allows a virtually unlimited set of creators creating content with generally speaking no rules. Chaos and anarchy - I couldn't imagine better environment for evolution really. Go Internets!

  22. I thought in swedish ... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... you'd just lengthen the first syllable so you'd have "Gooooogle".

    Hey , the Muppet Show taught me all I need to know about language! Though admittedly some of
    its facts were a bit fozzy around the edges.

    1. Re:I thought in swedish ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you were wrong. There is more to languages than the Muppets relized. I'd recommend you to read this

      http://www.escapeartist.com/efam/84/Swedish.html

      it is also wery funny (at least if you are from Sweden).

    2. Re:I thought in swedish ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah taht is in norweeeeeeeeeegian. We goooogle for støff - mostly teh facebook urlz and iphonz.

    3. Re:I thought in swedish ... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      That's Spanish (Mexican dialect).

      Anytime you realize you need to find something, appropriate response is to jump on the table and yell: Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle!

  23. Why realize now? by acs.judit · · Score: 1

    How can they talk so "professionally" about internet slang when it took them 20 years to realize its importance?

  24. The internet made you stupid by RivenAleem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminded me of this: http://i.imgur.com/MFEQB.jpg

    1. Re:The internet made you stupid by AtomicDog1471 · · Score: 1

      Absolute bullshit.

      For one thing, she wasn't necessarily stupid; she used proper spelling and punctuation in one reply, she obviously chose to type that way.

      Secondly, even if she was typing like a retard it would be her shoddy genes and half-hearted upbringing that would have "made her stupid". Not the internet. One thing the internet hasn't done is made people stupid.

    2. Re:The internet made you stupid by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Internet doesn't make people stupid, correct, but they all manage to congregate in a very special place all the same

  25. So many complaints by slackarse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So many complaints about /. articles.

    So why do you people come back ... and waste time reading ... then wasting more time commenting?

    --
    Come to Australia so we can strip search you and rob you of your internets, pr0n, rights and freedoms.
    1. Re:So many complaints by stuckinphp · · Score: 0

      To waste time. Obviously.

      --
      if only
    2. Re:So many complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That distant cry you hear? That's matt007 telling you to get off his lawn. :)

    3. Re:So many complaints by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I see them too, "why are the stories crap?" There's this thing called the "firehose" that people who don' like what's posted should visit...

    4. Re:So many complaints by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      For me, habit, and because I haven't found another news aggregation site that has a variety of articles as well suited to my tastes.

      It'd be great if there was a good way to filter out the utter crap from the interesting stuff here. I've blocked anything posted by kwadson, which is an amazingly good start. However, it does mean that there are times when slashdot doesn't show any new content for a half day or so.

      I like the variety here. What this place needs are some editors that do their fucking job, rather than just troll for eyeballs. The Firehose is filled with interesting stuff. An actual editor would use it for inspiration, then go and dig up the real info behind the stories. Instead, we get something that seems like the editors are always stoned, saying, "Dude, that's sooooo radical! Let's post that. Fucking SWEET man!" No editing of the submissions, no digging up some real meat behind something, no momentary pause to mentally consider, "Humm, is this really interesting, or just crap?"

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:So many complaints by virtuosonic · · Score: 1

      everyone criticizes everyone else post, just to look more smart that's the fun making other look like idiots

      --
      http://agender.sourceforge.net/ get a free schedule tool
    6. Re:So many complaints by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Because when /. was on form, it was way, way ahead of the curve. It annoys those of us who remember what that was like since we would like it back. Please.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:So many complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're here for the discussion.

  26. Not really by rikkards · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was expecting this to be more about how languages are infiltrating other languages (think Firefly and how they swear in Chinese). More like how the internet is making people more knowledgeable of tech terminology.

  27. This again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subby, I'm afraid that if you're only going to repost the same tired article despite the fact that this issue has been chewed and rechewed throughout the entire history of written language ... well, I'm going to have to replace you with a shell script. A short one.

  28. Mod parent up by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid (early nineties, had no idea what the Internet was; all I knew about computers was Prolog), anyone could pause the game if they had a valid reason to do so. We even had a particular gesture for that.

    --
    "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
  29. to Bork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To defeat a judicial nomination through a concerted attack on the nominee's character, background and philosophy.

    To fire an honest government official in an attempt to prevent embarrassment to and exposure of a dishonest government officeholder who has conspired to commit high crimes (term first used by the National Lampoon Radio Hour in to describe the 1973 firing of Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox by Solicitor General Robert Bork in the "Saturday Night Massacre" orchestrated by Bork and President Richard Nixon).

  30. When by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

    the CEO ends a two hour meeting with "All your base are belong to us." I'll know it's true.

    1. Re:When by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      The CEO needs to not only change with the times but adapt these changes to his situation.

      So you might hear him say 'All their base are belong to us!' as a motivational sales meeting closer.

  31. Whe are lossing the internet to the mainstream. by Tei · · Score: 1

    People are comming here, and using words ignoring the original meaning.

      - "Hackers" to describe everything maling.
      - "Noob" and "newbies". People that call noob to everybody, even unskilled players (?).
      - "Netiquette". This words is hardly in use today.
      - "Lurking". Another word missing in combat.
      - "Quoting". MIA.
      - "IMHO".
      - "IANAL".

    If you argue that noob!=newbie, you are called nerd... ON THE FUCKING INTERNETS.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:Whe are lossing the internet to the mainstream. by Spad · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I've always found that "newbie" is a fairly neutral term for someone new to an environment whereas "noob" is used as a pejorative term for people who *aren't* new but still act like they don't have a clue what they're doing.

    2. Re:Whe are lossing the internet to the mainstream. by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      I always prefered this definition of Noob vs. Newb.

      http://cdn.cad-comic.com/comics/3223892223c1814zzq2za94454048.jpg

  32. Try the real one by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just read the real bible and you'll be confusing fundies left and right.

    And you can go for even nastier than confusing if you want. For example, find someone who's a fan of that Ezekiel 4:9 bread, and tell them that the whole recipe given by God there continues all the way to Ezekiel 4:13: "and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man". Yep, God's recipe there actually calls for human shit as an ingredient for that bread. (Though Ezekiel himself, for being so faithful and kosher all his life, gets Gods dispensation in 4:15 to eat his with cow shit instead.)

    Especially if you spring that on them after they ate some, honestly, no amount of lolcat bible can even start to compare :p

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Try the real one by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Erk, I mean Ezekiel 4:12, not 4:13. Awful place to hit the wrong key. Sorry.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    2. Re:Try the real one by Eravau · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, God's recipe there actually calls for human shit as an ingredient for that bread.

      No... what it calls for is to use it as fuel for baking over... not as an ingredient (baking with vs. mixing with). A quick googling turns up this informational page which tells you how to make your own briquettes.

    3. Re:Try the real one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're also wrong. It's not called for as an ingredient, it's called for as a heat source... you are to burn the dung as a fuel.

    4. Re:Try the real one by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just read the real bible and you'll be confusing fundies left and right.

      That's true; for example, most of the fundies are anti-drug and anti-alcohol. But the bible has absolutely nothing to say about drugs, and absolutely nothing bad to say about alcohol. Most of the fundies really worship money rather than God, even though the bible is transparently anti-greed. Pat Robertson has converted more Christians to athiesm than all the athiests at slashdot put together.

      As to your recipe, you misread it -- the dung is used a fuel for the oven to bake the bread, not as an ingredient.

    5. Re:Try the real one by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, the fact still remains that the lord himself is calling it "defiled bread", one way or another. You could argue exactly what is used how, but still the result of that recipe is explicitly called "defiled bread". That's still quite far from what they think they're eating there, i.e., some wholesome nutrition recipe from the Lord himself.

      Plus, hey, it's still got a lot more shock value than a quote from the lolcat bible, which is really what I was saying there :p

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    6. Re:Try the real one by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      Just read the real bible and you'll be confusing fundies left and right.

      And you can go for even nastier than confusing if you want. For example, find someone who's a fan of that Ezekiel 4:9 bread, and tell them that the whole recipe given by God there continues all the way to Ezekiel 4:13: "and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man". Yep, God's recipe there actually calls for human shit as an ingredient for that bread. (Though Ezekiel himself, for being so faithful and kosher all his life, gets Gods dispensation in 4:15 to eat his with cow shit instead.)

      Especially if you spring that on them after they ate some, honestly, no amount of lolcat bible can even start to compare :p

      The poop wasn't an ingredient, it was the fuel used to cook the bread: "And you shall eat it as barley cakes; and bake it using fuel of human waste in their sight.”

      Doesn't make it a whole lot more pleasant, but let's at least be factually correct.

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    7. Re:Try the real one by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Didn't a bunch of fundie churches proclaim the KJV to be the one true version? Makes it more fun than the newer ones which toned it down like that.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    8. Re:Try the real one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should know that "thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man" means to use feces as the oven's fuel source.

    9. Re:Try the real one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the King James bible is from the 1600s, while the word fuel (in its original form) was around from the 1300s and had even made the transition to verb form by the late 1500s, so it's not like they couldn't have said fuel if that's what they meant. Either they intended ambiguity (and really, why?) or there is ambiguity. I think fuel is the likely answer, but that's still my personal interpretation and it doesn't rule out the alternative.

    10. Re:Try the real one by anjin-san+3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The bible doesn't say anything bad about alcohol in and of itself, but there are quite a few lines that speak against excessive imbibery and drunkeness.

  33. TFA is teh suck by aoeu · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    All your database are belong to U.S.
    1. Re:TFA is teh suck by Spad · · Score: 1

      tl;dr

  34. How lolcats are changing the language by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    I can has new vernacular?

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  35. Typing in topics is stupid. It's not a dissertatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Language itself changes slowly but the internet has speeded up the process of those changes so you notice them more quickly."

    Speeded? Are they serious? They're illiterate, yet commenting on language. I see Americanism has spread far and wide. Thank you, Mr. Internet.

  36. English wins by everweb · · Score: 1

    Never mind the internet changing language, the real change is that computers are forcing the English language itself into all the curvy corners of the globe. Sure, you can change the language settings on your windowing system to your local language but how many actual programming languages are written in any language other than English? You will be assimilated.

    1. Re:English wins by Shados · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately (and i am NOT a native english speaker), this is not true. For a while it was, until a few years ago when non-english speakers reached a critical mass and started pulling a lot harder. Now you need to localize everything, as the people of many regions will simply reject anything in english.

      If there was ever a chance for a universal language (as that would make the world a much better place, regardless of WHICH language it is), its dead now. Or well, i guess it could be mandarin someday, though that is less than ideal once you toss in modern issues with learning writing systems, computers, and accents (which would mess the tones).

      Something more akin to japanese systems (without kanji) would probably be ideal if used without the others.

      But we don't live in an ideal world :)

  37. Yes, apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'To Google' has become a universally understood verb

    The BBC is capitalizing verbs now! Where will this end?

  38. Bullshit by Moraelin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah, the endless capacity of apologists to BS themselves by postulating what's not actually in the text. How cute.

    Well, no. In Ezekiel 4:13 so sayeth God: "And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them." My emphasis. Clearly either that bread recipe from 4:9 is already defiled from the start, or that human shit is defiling it. Either way, it's not some wholesome recipe for good bread, but for defiled bread. No matter how you separate which step is defiling it, it's still not given a recipe for good nutrition.

    But more telling is the exchange in 4:14-15:

    14. Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.

    15. Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow's dung for man's dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.

    Ezekiel is clearly protesting that on account of his purity, and substituting cow dung is somehow making it better. It doesn't sound like he just has a problem with using briquettes.

    But most importantly the choice of words in 4:15 makes it clearer what it's meant. "and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith" My emphasis again.

    But again, regardless of how you use it, the fact remains that God gave a recipe for defiled bread. A fact that was completely lost on the cretins selling and buying Ezekiel 4:9 bread and actually believing (and some arguing) it's an example of good nutrition as prescribed by the Bible.

    And basically that's what I meant by confusing fundies with the real bible. The average lemming doesn't know what's actually in it, and at best goes by some BS apology that has nothing to do with what's actually in there. The lemmings buying that bread and using it as an example of the bible prescribing good nutrition, haven't even read the couple of verses directly after it on the same page. They don't actually _know_ what that quote was actually for when in context.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Bullshit by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But most importantly the choice of words in 4:15 makes it clearer what it's meant. "and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith" My emphasis again.

      No, you're being an idiot. Cooking over cowshit was SOP, cooking over human shit defiles food, because involving human shit in anything was a defilement at the time, because they didn't understand E.Coli &c. Further, most of the bad shit in the bible where someone did something in the name of the lord is considered by the christian faith to be "some old shit" (phrasing mine) because that's all just background and alleged history, and christians are supposed to follow the word of Christ and the gospels where they contradict the old testament. That's what makes them Christians and not Jews.

      Note that I am a so-called "soft agnostic" who believes that God may be exist and be knowable, but that he is so far unknown. So I'm not trying to defend religion from the inside. I'm just trying to point out that not only does it not say what you think it's saying, but your arguments for believing same are just retarded. That, or you're a particularly insistent troll. Prepared with does not mean what you think it means. I prepare pesto with a food processor, but the food processor is not an ingredient.

      Ezekiel 4 is a historical record. So sure, people making bread from the "recipe" (that is not a recipe, it is a partial list of ingredients) are idiots. But that doesn't mean the passage says what you think it says. Nobody is supposed to put shit in the bread, you're just dumb. Arguably, though, if you want to make it by the "recipe" you should cook it over cowshit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Bullshit by MWojcik · · Score: 1

      Ah, the endless capacity of apologists to BS themselves by postulating what's not actually in the text. How cute.

      Why don't you follow your own advice and look what's actually in the text?

      A few examples from http://bible.cc/ezekiel/4-12.htm :

      New International Version (©1984)
      Eat the food as you would a barley cake; bake it in the sight of the people, using human excrement for fuel."

      New Living Translation (©2007)
      Prepare and eat this food as you would barley cakes. While all the people are watching, bake it over a fire using dried human dung as fuel and then eat the bread."

      English Standard Version (©2001)
      And you shall eat it as a barley cake, baking it in their sight on human dung.”

      New American Standard Bible (©1995)
      "You shall eat it as a barley cake, having baked it in their sight over human dung."

      GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
      Eat the bread as you would eat barley loaves. Bake the bread in front of people, using human excrement for fuel."

      King James Bible
      And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight.

    3. Re:Bullshit by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Ah, the endless capacity of apologists to BS themselves by postulating what's not actually in the text. How cute.

      Actually, the GP has it right. The human dung was used as a fuel, not as an ingredient. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+4%3A9-17&version=NIV)

      Atheists trying to do theology is a lot more entertaining than lolcats, anyhow.

    4. Re:Bullshit by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow,the word of God sure does change a lot. If I didn't know any better, I'd think that people wrote it and rewrote it to suit their own agendas.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    5. Re:Bullshit by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>In Ezekiel 4:13 so sayeth God: "And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them."

      Anybody this anal (and critical of religion) should realize a 600 year old King James translation is inadequate. The original hebrew says nothing like that. It makes it quite clear to HEAT the bread with dung, not to dump the shit in the bread mix.

      Similarly the original Hebrew does not forbid man-on-man love (as the KJ version of Leviticus claims). It says two men shall not sleep in one woman's bed (i.e. it's a ban on threesomes). I have no objections to being anti-religious..... I merely object to people being wrong. Go to the original source FIRST before you presume yourself more knowledgeable than the "fundies" you hate.

      Because you clearly are no wiser than they.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:Bullshit by MWojcik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and these are all in the same language. We probably have no way to interpret it the way the authors intended.

    7. Re:Bullshit by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but the bible was not written in English. Your argument of the context highlighting specific words is an utter failure without considering the writing in its Hebrew context. It would be nice to get someone knowing Hebrew to comment on this issue.

    8. Re:Bullshit by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Go to the original source FIRST before you presume yourself more knowledgeable than the "fundies" you hate.

      When the purpose is to say "hey, you know that particular translation of that holy book you hold so dear? Take a look at what else it says", it is correct to use the translation that the "fundies" are using.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    9. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the King James is 400 years old and has much the same meaning as the modern translations, where's the rewriting? The modern translations differ slightly in choice of words because they take different philosophies on translation. ESV aims to be a more literal translation at the expense of readability. NLT aims to be in simple English, so the translation is less literal and doesn't use any big words.

  39. What? No comments on slashspeak? by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What? No mention of Slashspeak? No "If you loose at poker, your a bad player, and you will run out of chip's"?

    1. Re:What? No comments on slashspeak? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was a bit surprised by that to. I know since I created a UID here, I started making slashdot meme jokes in public and my social life has been on a steady decline ever since... >

    2. Re:What? No comments on slashspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was a bit surprised by that to. I know since I created a UID here, I started making slashdot meme jokes in public and my social life has been on a steady decline ever since... >

      Must have been a short decline.

  40. This is a repeat from 1950, 1914, 1899, etc. by paiute · · Score: 1

    "BBC News reports on how the internet/computer/telephone/horseless carriage/steam locomotive/rifled gun barrel/frigate/fire/written language is changing language."

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  41. Frigidaire? by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    I dunno. The adoption of "Googling" as a verb meaning to perform an internet search is the same as what I experienced as a kid: everyone in the neighborhood referred to their refrigerators as "Frigidaires" regardless of the brand name of the actual refrigerator they owned.

  42. Leetspeak by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    "Leetspeak" in which some letters are replaced by numbers which stem from programming code.

    Uhh ... or, you know, standard Arabic numerals used in most (all?) Western languages.

    Unless they're trying to say that "programming code" replaces letters with numbers. Sad to say, I don't really think you'll get very far calling C0ns0l3.Wr1t3L1n3("H3110 w0r1d!").

    --
    R.Mo
  43. Except it wasn't that clear by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Except it wasn't that clear even to other bible translators and scholars. E.g., the Douay-Rheims Bible translates the same verse as, "And thou shalt eat it as barley bread baked under the ashes: and thou shalt cover it, in their sight, with the dung that cometh out of a man." Note the method of baking those barley cakes, and why using it even as fuel still isn't any better.

    It's also not the first time that the threat of eating shit is used in the OT, and likely was a reason why Ezekiel mentions that. E.g., in Isaiah 36:12 that is used as an explicit threat in another siege of Jerusalem: "But Rabshakeh said, "Has my master sent me only to your master and to you to speak these words, and not to the men who sit on the wall, doomed to eat their own dung and drink their own urine with you?"" That Ezekiel would essentially repeat a threat they already had in a previous siege, is actually not very hard to swallow.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Except it wasn't that clear even to other bible translators and scholars. E.g., the Douay-Rheims Bible translates the same verse as, "And thou shalt eat it as barley bread baked under the ashes: and thou shalt cover it, in their sight, with the dung that cometh out of a man."

      Yes, there are lots of bad translations of the bible, both deliberate and accidental.

      Note the method of baking those barley cakes, and why using it even as fuel still isn't any better. [...] That Ezekiel would essentially repeat a threat they already had in a previous siege, is actually not very hard to swallow.

      Occam's Razor suggests that since people baked bread OVER shit all the time, trying to find ways to make it look like they were eating the shit in this context is just overcomplicating things. Also, if you're baking the bread in the ashes, then putting more fuel over the top of the bread is also SOP, but it is STILL not using the shit as an ingredient. The outside of bread baked in this way is not eaten! This is another shitty argument.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, the result of the whole thing is called "defiled bread" on the same page. That's what results out of the recipe the Lord gave. It explicitly says so. You can go and invent your own ways to cook it without defiling it, but that was not the purpose of that exercise in the first place.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by kv9 · · Score: 1

      you have "poo" in your username, no wonder you're defending stuff that has shit in it.

    4. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, the result of the whole thing is called "defiled bread" on the same page.

      and yet, the Ezekiel bread is then first defiled with human shit, but later cooked with cowshit without being defiled, again on the very same page. You're seriously trying too hard. You're exactly as pathetic as the bible-"following" morons who try to make the bible say what THEY want it to say. You're just giving more energy to Christianity when you seem to be trying to oppose idiocy in its name.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Actually, it doesn't say that the one cooked with cow shit isn't defiled. That it's a partial dispensation that God gives Ezekiel, would of course indicate it's less offensive to some degree, but it never actually says that now it's kosher. Heck, if you understand their purity laws, there was no way for that mixed-grain bread to be kosher even if cooked in a microwave oven. (And yes, I know it didn't exist yet.) One way or the other that thing was _still_ defiled, and still meant to be a sort of an offensive "look at the kind of crap you'll eat when conquered by gentiles" horror story. It was just less so than with human shit.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    6. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      One way or the other that thing was _still_ defiled, and still meant to be a sort of an offensive "look at the kind of crap you'll eat when conquered by gentiles" horror story. It was just less so than with human shit.

      Which is still only relevant if you're a Jew, because one of Jesus' messages was that dietary restrictions were stupid and besides the point and had nothing to do with God. Again, Christianity is supposed to make that kind of shit all but irrelevant. The entire Old Testament is just one big historical footnote to a Christian who understands Christianity (a vanishingly small percentage.) If you're all wrapped up in the Old Testament you might as well be a Jew for Jesus (although the Jews won't let you be a Jew if your mom isn't one, so I guess they forced that particular schism.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Except it wasn't that clear by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      So basically, the Bible is designed for people who can swallow any shit that's fed to them.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  44. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man"...

    Wouldn't that mean, that you should burn human dung for the fire to bake the bread? Not that you'd actually put it into the bread.

    Still rather gross, but dung of all animals (including humans) makes fertilizer for farming, so God probably knew it was widely available.

  45. We come for the comments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The comments are often vastly more interesting than the articles, or even the summaries. Moderation might obscure some valuable stuff, but it also obscures most of the crap and helps sift most of the good comments out from a sea of inane drivel.

    Not reading the article is a time-honored tradition around here, but for the last few years the summaries have been so badly biased and "edited" that I barely even read those either. I just skim the summary to get an idea of what the best comments are likely to be about, and then I plunge into those.

  46. A few words I can think of by iB1 · · Score: 1

    Brick - "I tried to upgrade my PS3 firmware but it bricked my console" FAIL - "You bought a Nokia instead of an iPhone? FAIL" Several people have mentioned "LOL" before. It's annoying enough in e-mails and MSN conversations, but when someone actually says "LOL" in a verbal conversation - argh!!!!

    1. Re:A few words I can think of by neminem · · Score: 1

      Funny, when someone actually says LOL in a verbal conversation, it makes me... LOL. :p (Really, it does. It tends to make me laugh; I find it pretty hilarious.)
      I never type "lol" nonironically myself, though, but it doesn't really bother me, either. (As for your example of "fail", I think you got that backwards.)

  47. Story = Excuse... by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

    ...to post one of my favorite quotes:

    The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that the English language is as pure as a crib-house whore. It not only borrows words from other languages; it has on occasion chased other languages down dark alley-ways, clubbed them unconscious and rifled their pockets for new vocabulary. -- James Nicoll

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  48. It's tempting to write the history of slang too... by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

    ...early. In the early 90s, "surf" was pretty common, as was the whole idea of "going online", both of which sound silly today. Add to that, "everything-nothing sites", which would now be called "blogs". Or, god forbid "cyberspace" or cyber-anything.

    Will "google" as a verb stand the test of time? Maybe. But it's too early to assume it will. I did like the "Google with Bing" parody, fantastic stuff.
    http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1915736

  49. All communications systems change languages... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    All communications systems change languages but especially the technical forms. The telegraph changed the language for those who used it - and for those who came after. The abbreviation "tks" or "tnx" or simply "tu" for "thank you" was a telegraphic form that started with wire-based telegraphy and migrated into radio telegraphy and then into satellite communications and now it's made its way into cell phone texting. When I learned this abbreviation in the 1950s I never expected it to fall into common use.

    One of the most interesting things about this is that these abbreviations crossed language lines; usually the English format being understood by everyone else regardless of language. This seems to be continuing in texting and computer chat.

    Two other communications-based forms that crossed over into common use would be "10-4" and "roger that" for "I understand". Saying "roger" was to use the phonetic for the letter "R" which wire telegraphers began to use back in the 19th century when they wanted to acknowledge receipt of a message. Even though wire-based "Morse" was much different than the "Morse" used in radio telegraphy many operators (including me) moved between them and brought along their abbreviations and customs.

    Making "Google" into a verb is simply a continuation... not something new.

    I wonder if smoke signals changed native American languages.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  50. Info or GTFO? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    /repurposed

  51. Change happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All languages change or die. We can barely read English books written 100 years ago--they are full of long flatulent sentences. Four hundred year old englyshe is almost completely unreadable. I'm sure no one at any time liked any of the changes that led to where we are now.

    Same old same olde.

  52. Not for the better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A considerable population of internet users, (unfortunately they appear to be mainly Americans), seem absolutely oblivious to the difference between then and than, and their correct usage.

  53. I hate to burst your bubble... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... but that expression has been (uh, pardon the expression) absolutely SOP in the military since before I got in (mid-80's). I think it actually dates back to Vietnam.

  54. tl;dr by rusl · · Score: 1

    actually I did because the snippet was so short and I too caught that.

    leet speak could be said to be used for programming good passwords but other than that?

    Some people do use actual programming code, I have got the "Leet Key" firefox plugin. But that stuff is pretty obscure not going to make it into the OED except maybe the maybe the term 1337 itself? Actually, come to think of that, how are they going to alphabetise that? Before A or with LE?

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  55. Although... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The abbreviation "tks" or "tnx" or simply "tu" for "thank you" was a telegraphic form that started with wire-based telegraphy and migrated into radio telegraphy and then into satellite communications and now it's made its way into cell phone texting.

    To more precise, this is really more like convergent evolution than "making its way into" cell phone texting. It's not like today's cell phone texters looked back on their telegraphy experience and repurposed this technique. They reinvented it. Kind of a small point, but it's worth noting that the reason you keep seeing this kind of thing is because it's the obvious and natural thing to do when there's a non-insignificant amount of effort required to make each character.

  56. evolution by rusl · · Score: 1

    I actually think that the individualistic perspective of our species is ridiculous: We are linguistic animals and without that culture we could neither think nor do many of the other quintessentially human activities. Hence, language evolution is integrally part of our species evolution. IMHO.

    PS nice Hindenberg sig there.I actually met the owner of the White Dwarf in 2002: http://airshipworld.blogspot.com/2007/08/white-dwarf-pedal-powered-personal.html

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  57. Re:It's tempting to write the history of slang too by rusl · · Score: 1

    Information Superhighway! Netizens!

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  58. new characters by rusl · · Score: 1

    what about new use of characters like ~ @ / which were pretty rare before... or now # is used differently.

    Also_the_practice_of_replacing-spaces-with-something.else.instead.of.a.space.

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  59. No by BatGnat · · Score: 1

    The internet doesn't change the language, Stupid people change the language.

  60. Nice... by hardboiled.tequila · · Score: 1

    Clockwork Orange FTW...

  61. At least you could read it. by bjwrenn · · Score: 1

    The dung is fuel and is still used as fuel in many parts of the world. Ezekiel 4:12 And you must eat the food like you would a barley cake. You must bake it in front of them over a fire made with dried human excrement.

  62. You have to read the whole thing by bjwrenn · · Score: 1

    Anyone reading what Ezekiel wrote at the time would understand that human dung as fuel made the bread ritually unclean. Read all of Ezekiel (better the whole Old Testament) and it will make sense. Rule # 2 for understanding the Bible. Never take a text out of its context in order to prove a pretext.

  63. It's changing langauage by by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    taking a big steaming shit on it.

    The efforts of teachers are futile against the deluge of stupidity net kids spew at each other.

    Descriptivists defending ignorance and laziness in 3... 2... 1....

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!