Slashdot Mirror


'Death By GPS' Increasing In America's Wilderness

An anonymous reader writes "Every year, more and more Americans are dying in deserts and wildernesses because they rely on their GPS units (and, to some degree, their cellphones) to always be accurate. The Sacramento Bee quotes Death Valley wilderness coordinator Charlie Callagan: 'It's what I'm beginning to call death by GPS ... People are renting vehicles with GPS and they have no idea how it works and they are willing to trust the GPS to lead them into the middle of nowhere.'"

599 comments

  1. Please take responsibility for your life. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on, folks, you're traveling between Portland OR and Las Vegas NV, and your GPS says the most direct route is over some gravel Forest Service road in the Eastern Oregon mountains... In the winter... You take it? Really?

    Your GPS takes you down some deserted desert road that peters away into sand in the mifddle of Death Valley... Really?

    There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Though that's also a deceit (effectively) by the GPS unit / their manufacturers don't tend to advertise their capabilities as "may be wrong" (and how can random people know up front?)

      Related: some solutions could stop insisting on loading the needed data only at the start of a particular journey. Allowing to have recent and fairly good offline maps of large areas, also where there's no cellular signal, would really help with the whole concept of GPS...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Yes some people really are that stupid, I heard on the news of someone who drove into a body of water (not sure if it was a river the lake or the sea) because their GPS didn't indicate it was a ferry link rather than a road. Don't remember whether they died or not but it shows how stupid people can be.

      A bigger problem over here in old blighty is articulated lorries getting stuck by driving down roads that are too narrow or otherwise unsuitable. One big problem in this case is it's virtually impossible to turn a lorry on a narrow road. So if the road starts looking bad the choices are to carry on and hope they don't get stuck, try to reverse out (very slow and likely to require a second person) or tow the lorry out.

      It doesn't help that in britan we identify our roads based on how important they are in the network, not generally on how big they are.

      There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

      Agreed

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      The less apt individuals don't pass on their genes. That's the whole point of the Darwin Awards.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    4. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by characterZer0 · · Score: 2

      I have read a few cases of people driving into bodies of water and buildings. I cannot fathom how someone would just drive into water. I suspect they drove off the road because they were fidgeting with the GPS or something else instead of looking at the road, and then blamed the GPS

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    5. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by corsec67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      their manufacturers don't tend to advertise their capabilities as "may be wrong"

      All of the Garmin Nuvi GPS units I have had have a warning screen that shows every single time that it is turned on saying this.

      This probably is more a feature of people liking to be getting orders, even when those orders are wrong.

      Not to say that I am immune. I have found my self going down roads where if my GPS quit I would only have a vague idea of how to get home from that location.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    6. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plain ol maps don't tell you they 'may be wrong' either. It comes with the territory. No matter what you are using for a guide - maps, mystic revelations, signs from God - you still still have to look out the windshield and think occasionally. In the Olden Days when I did Search and Rescue in Colorado we didn't have GPS. We had maps. And we ended up pulling out idiots from all sorts of places because the 'map told them' they could get from one abandoned mining town to another over a 13000 foot pass in a Volkswagen.

      And your second wish has been granted. There are a number of iPhone apps which do allow you to download maps before you head out. Very classy. Garmin ought to be scared - the iPhone is a hell of a lot better GPS than my Oregon 400: better display, better GPS chip, better battery life (really!). The only advantage that the Garmin has is that it's completely waterproof and I can carry a passle of AA batteries with me.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep. Natural selection is still alive & well - assisted by computers giving bad directions. Reminds me of that Office episode:

      GPS: "Turn here."
      "Michael that's a lake!"
      "But the GPS said turn here, so I'm turning here."
      (vroom) - (splash)

      When I was in Salt Lake city I tried to take an old road parallel to I-80, but when it started beating my car's suspension said "Screw this" and turned around. You have to use the computer God put in your frakking head!

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "All of the Garmin Nuvi GPS units I have had have a warning screen that shows every single time that it is turned on saying this."

      My TomTom doesn't do that... does that mean Garmin assumes their buyers are stupider or that TomTom isn't worried about being sued?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    9. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      The less apt individuals don't pass on their genes. That's the whole point of the Darwin Awards.

      Is there some fund or organization that I can contribute to that will distribute GPS devices to morons^H^H^H^H^H^H disadvantaged families?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    10. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by plover · · Score: 3, Informative

      A bigger problem over here in old blighty is articulated lorries getting stuck by driving down roads that are too narrow or otherwise unsuitable. One big problem in this case is it's virtually impossible to turn a lorry on a narrow road. So if the road starts looking bad the choices are to carry on and hope they don't get stuck, try to reverse out (very slow and likely to require a second person) or tow the lorry out.

      In America, there are GPS maps created by commercial services for sale to the trucking industry. These maps include weight restrictions, width and height restrictions, truck routes, diesel fuel truck stops, tire and service centers, all kinds of information that is specific to the driving of big rigs. I would assume you have similar services available over there. But if your ordinary trucker thinks he can just drop a $99 Garmin on his dashboard and use it to drag a 30 tonne trailer to wherever he wants, well, that's almost as foolish as trying to cross two hundred miles of desert because there's a little blue line on the screen.

      --
      John
    11. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by JonStewartMill · · Score: 1

      I heard on the news of someone who drove into a body of water (not sure if it was a river the lake or the sea) because their GPS didn't indicate it was a ferry link rather than a road. Don't remember whether they died or not but it shows how stupid people can be.

      Wasn't that an episode of The [American]Office?

    12. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd hardly call James Kim (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Kim) a "moron".

      The guy went to Oberlin College, and worked as a reviewer for CNET. He and his family missed an exit while traveling through southern Oregon. Instead of turning around, they asked their GPS for an alternate route. It told them to take a rarely used road that had a lot of snow. Their car got stuck. After about a week, he decided to try to walk to a town that he thought was four miles away. He died of exposure.

      He made a couple of bad decisions, and it cost him his life.

    13. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It still isn't advertised much (hey, it would be bad advertising...) / such screens are apparently easy to ignore.

      BTW, it's even more puzzling when people seem to rely on GPS, and in an unsafe way ... when it isn't really needed. It's not a very rare sight to see a car with local plates, few to dozen km from its (small / impossible to get lost in) hometown, driving towards it on an ubermain road, in the night, with the display of GPS unit blasting at full brightness into the eyes of its driver...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    14. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by vonux · · Score: 1

      I have found my self going down roads where if my GPS quit I would only have a vague idea of how to get home from that location.

      Since the GPS makes it so easy to navigate from A to B, people might embark on a journey without really considering what could go wrong. False sense of security and all that. It could be your car that broke down, leaving you knowing where you are, but with no practical way of getting out of there.

    15. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      well maps have this thing called a 'legend' that visually indicates that the road is gravel or paved or divided highway. And you need to follow the map all the way to your destination to know the way.

      GPS just says 'turn here' 'continue for elventybillion miles'. It doesn't readily give you any idea what types of roads you'll be encountering.

      That said, I'm on the side of the 'Darwinism' this represents. However, all these morons tax our emergency responder resources so much that they can't always respond to 'actual' emergencies. So in this case the morons actually do endanger more than just themselves.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    16. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I cannot fathom how someone would just drive into water.

      Probably dark/foggy and they were driving on what looked like a bridge, but was really a ferry dock. Of course, there was probably a crossing-arm that they drove through/around to fall into the water.

    17. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by afidel · · Score: 2

      It probably doesn't cross their mind as they are a European company and such a lawsuit would most likely fail.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it as evolution in action.

    19. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      The less apt individuals don't pass on their genes. That's the whole point of the Darwin Awards.

      Is there some fund or organization that I can contribute to that will distribute GPS devices to morons^H^H^H^H^H^H disadvantaged families?

      Disadvantaged families don't take hiking trips into hostile terrain (with exception of illegal immigrants from Mexico), so they'd just sell them to middle class folk and the middle classers would die.

    20. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

      Nature has been killing the ill-prepared for as long as there have been humans. Why do you think her opposite is called Nurture?

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    21. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those folks who use GPS when they know where they're going. I usually don't program in a destination and just use it like a heads up display. Time, speed, direction, cross streets etc. All that training in Grand Theft Auto being but to good use!

    22. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Apparently many cellphone GPS receivers are "tower assisted" and some of them struggle to get a GPS lock without the assistance of a cell tower. Not sure how the iphone stands in this regard.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    23. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      God forbid you fucking turn around. I see these people in the LA area all the time. Except sadly, Instead of getting killed by mother nature they slide across 6 lanes
      making everyone else stop dead so they can hit their exit.

      Fuck all those people.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    24. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      It still isn't advertised much (hey, it would be bad advertising...) / such screens are apparently easy to ignore.

      So many things come with disclaimers like that, they're easy to blow off. You just figure it's there as a CYA, and you think "damn frivolous lawsuits" -- if you ponder it at all -- and proceed to use it.

      Heck, you buy a screwdriver and it says to wear eye protection at all times when using it. So I'm not surprised that users routinely ignore both important and unimportant warnings alike. We might actually be safer with fewer of them.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    25. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      well maps have this thing called a 'legend' that visually indicates that the road is gravel or paved or divided highway.

      Years ago I wanted to drive to the top of a particular mountain. I had two maps from different companies. On one map the road was marked as a normal dirt road. On the other map it was marked as a 4WD track. I decided to believe the former rather than the latter because I wanted to get to the top of the mountain. It turned out the the road was more of a 4WD track and I bounced up and down on it in my station wagon. Fortunately I didn't get stuck and only had to replace the exhaust system on my car due to all the dents it got.

      No map, be it paper or electronic is going to be perfect. And at some point you have to make a judgement call between the map yo have and the reality you are looking at.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    26. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      There are differences in certainty each solution conveys or tries to convey... (isn't the whole theme of GPS in popular culture "get to any destination you want, effortlessly! Just pick it!"? And don't go into areas of promises from gods... ;p )

      The thing about preloading (or, specifically, lack of it) is how certain solutions which are generally great, and are bound to become massively popular & on which many people will certainly depend ... seem to eschew fully offline capability, and for no good reason. Well, except for how it would get in the way of "location AdSense"...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    27. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Far more likely the stories are apocryphal. Urban Legends.
      Ferry landings are far from hard to miss.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    28. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by geekprime · · Score: 1

      And that's different from any other breakdown exactly how?

      How is it worse because the gps knows where you are? You can at least tell the tow truck/cops/whatever exactly where to find you.

      One of the advantages of using google maps & the gps in my phone is the aerial photo overlay, I can tell if the road turns tiny and choose another.

    29. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      This isn't about the map/GPS being wrong, as you say they can be and are in many cases. This is about people not even having the data given on a map to decide whether the route is suitable. It just takes them to the next turn.

      Certainly once you're own the road, noticing that you haven't seen pavement in a while is required, but if you don't know the road will become a 4wd trail in 10 miles you might keep going beyond your return ability. I.e. you don't know you're in trouble until it's too late.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    30. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Only goes to show you how stupid a Oberlin College graduate could be.

      Did he not SEE the snow?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    31. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      A bigger problem over here in old blighty is articulated lorries getting stuck by driving down roads that are too narrow or otherwise unsuitable. One big problem in this case is it's virtually impossible to turn a lorry on a narrow road.

      Around here many roads have signs that say "Trucks Over 28 Feet From Kingpin To Axle Prohibited." The number varies with the radius of the sharpest curve. They don't seem to do much good as truckers regularly ignore them and get stuck, blocking the road for hours.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    32. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Swampash · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Kims didn't use a GPS, they used a paper map.

    33. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by magarity · · Score: 1

      My TomTom doesn't do that... does that mean Garmin assumes their buyers are stupider or that TomTom isn't worried about being sued?

      rtfa - tomtom sent one of their specialists to death valley to review and update the mapping data with the rangers. you don't need a warning message, so head on out!

    34. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by milkmage · · Score: 1

      do you think onboard maps would have helped this dolt?
      http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jTvYZZKnORmo0blYq7iGHgKsmQ
      show me the special map that tells you a collision with a large body of water is imminent.

      and what about this guy (with pics)...
      http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/02/gps-leads-driver-into-tight-spot-stays-wedged-for-three-days/

    35. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      In a lot of these cases, there is a ferry to take you across the river. The problem is that most of the time, the ferry is not at end of the ramp and off the end you go.

    36. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      ...and optionally, traffic up ahead. Mine gets traffic info from XM, which includes accidents, road work and closed ramps. An occasional glance at the screen has allowed me to re-route around problems before drivers around me are even aware there is a problem.

      So yes, it does stay on all the time. Doesn't mean I'm lost in my home town.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    37. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      Yes, a very funny scene with Micheal determined to follow the insistent voice commands despite Dwight yelling "Stop, there's no road here!"

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    38. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      their manufacturers don't tend to advertise their capabilities as "may be wrong"

      All of the Garmin Nuvi GPS units I have had have a warning screen that shows every single time that it is turned on saying this.

      This probably is more a feature of people liking to be getting orders, even when those orders are wrong.

      Not to say that I am immune. I have found my self going down roads where if my GPS quit I would only have a vague idea of how to get home from that location.

      You seem to be confusing real dashboard GPS units with cellphones.

      They are far from the same. A typical Dashboard GPS has all the maps onboard.
      They also offers route defaults that favor major roads (shortest time), and these never lead you into trouble other than temporary weather or construction delays. Maps may become obsolete over several years. Roads just don't change that frequently.

      And these dashboard units are seldom ever "Wrong" as to your location, and don't rely on any cellular signals. There are the occasional blind spots (city canyons), but these are temporary. If you go thru a tunnel you may lose signals, but the better GPS units realize this, and realize you really can't get lost in a tunnel, and simply revert to estimation till you emerge from the tunnel.

      As for wide open desert spaces, the dashboard GPS units don't fail. Common sense fails.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    39. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      A problem in Britain is some people (whoever makes the signs) put up ridiculously wordy signs.

      There's one by my house that says "Notice: Width restriction 7'2" (2.8m) 330 yards ahead". It's blue, and blue = information, normally. The sign ought to be a red-bordered circle with >2.8m< inside, and "300m ahead" underneath (or ^ 300m ^).

    40. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      There is no god.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    41. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      for some they keep on driving.

      Last winter an 80 something year old woman went missing. In the spring a sailboat hit something where there shouldn't have been anything. Divers are called in to investigate, a car is found with the old woman still inside. She had driven around a guard house(in the winter the gates are up as few visit), around a building through a snow bank, did a u turn and backed into the water. The last two on the yard/tennis court, and through a small dock fence.

      Some people get confused very easily. They can only trust one source of information and seldom it is their own eyes that get trusted first.

      At my previous job the front of the building was trashed twice. When some old person put their car into forward instead of reverse and slammed on the gas instead of just going slowly. If you see a building where there are steel posts or a large curb between the parking and the building chances are some dumb schumck drove into the building at one point.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    42. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add: When looking for a navigation app for iDevices, look under the "BUY ME NOW OMG" button, there is information about the actual download. If it's in KB or MB, the apps streams the maps over the air and is likely quite affordable (and failure prone in low signal areas). The ones in GB have local maps, and can keep working as long as the iDevice's GPS chip sees satellites. I did TomTom for a while, but am growing to love CoPilot HD.

    43. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by puddles · · Score: 1

      If you're a Jeeper, you will :-)

    44. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      What, you don't look at the route before you start? Seriously, if it isn't obviously a city, you should be doing that - sometimes turns are tricky, and you can easily get lost, or the GPS can send you to the jersey shore for no particular reason. It's just an aid.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    45. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have twice relied on Google maps to my detriment. Both of which took me down sketchy ex-logging roads that would have bottomed out my car if I hadn't turned around.

    46. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I know of a ferry landing that you could miss. I also know of a couple of seasonal fords that are perfectly passable some of the time, and would be deadly at other times. I also think drivers are responsible for where their vehicles go.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    47. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Totenglocke · · Score: 0

      Yes, but for some reason we have groups who want to get upset that the unfit kill themselves off.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    48. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by icebike · · Score: 1

      How do these freak accidents relate to GPS usage?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    49. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem is that Google Maps relies on an active Internet connection, which may not be available all the time. Specially in the places where you'd really need guidance, such as the Death Valley mentioned in TFA.

    50. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

      Only Zuel.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    51. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I have read a few cases of people driving into bodies of water and buildings. I cannot fathom how someone would just drive into water. I suspect they drove off the road because they were fidgeting with the GPS or something else instead of looking at the road, and then blamed the GPS

      I have been at one place where GPS directions would have driven you right into a lake. I arrived there in bright daylight, so I had no problems. But I can very much appreciate that someone arriving there in the middle of the night would have got wet feet or worse.

    52. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by muindaur · · Score: 1

      I'm a AAA member for more than just the fact that it drops the hookup($100+) to the dues you pay. I also go to an office to talk with them. They will help you plan a trip, and get you all the offline(cell phones don't cut it) maps you might need.

      Do I have a GPS? Yes.
      Do I use it to go EVERYWHERE? Not really. It's a tool that helps me find a motel in a TOWN I don't know, or a business I'm going to interview at someplace unfamiliar. I've used it to help learn a new route on a commute(sometimes there are roads just out of a major city widely unused) because I found some route that takes twenty minutes longer two exits out of the city no one uses because google maps said it takes longer(I value missing the two hours for a thirty minute commute from traffic.)

      Another thing I'm good at(mid twenties) is reading a map, and planning highways myself. This is due to my stepfather on family trips growing up. I was the official navigator. So control of the maps was in my hands, and coming up with alternate routes. Each route I came up with he would tell me the pros and cons(having driven on them he knew the traffic patterns at different times/days/seasons.) He may have know the routes, but as a kid it was the feeling of being treated like an adult besides figuring out how to get someplace.

      So besides having decent resouces to get paper maps still, education is also needed. Parents need to get some maps, and teach kids to use them.

    53. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was done to prove to Ryan (who just created the web app "Dunder Mifflin Infinity" in an attempt to replace salesman with technology) that technology was not something that could blindly be trusted.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunder_Mifflin_Infinity

    54. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need a new GPS if your GPS units don't show road type. The problem is, that data is only slightly more accurate than the data found on a printed map, and many people don't check it. Not that they can't, they don't.

      My Blackberry with Google Maps shows the road type of each waypoint, and I can scroll down through them and see if the route has come up with a dirt track. Blackberry maps works similarly, and my wife's Nokia Symbian phone also does that. So does my Magellan Meridian Color which is the better part of a decade old, and the Garmin I had prior to that which was before GPS screens were done in fancy color. My mother has a Mercury with GPS, and it's pretty clear as to what road types you are going to encounter, and even allows you to avoid certain road types if you want. I've seen screenshots of TomToms and they clearly show different colors for different road types.

      The real problem occurs when the map data is inaccurate, and that's going to happen no matter HOW you get your maps.

      I've had plenty of printed maps that have showed me roads that no longer exist, or the road that is there does not resemble the road on the map at all (say, what's that beaver dam doing in the middle of this mud pit that's marked on the map as a 2-lane paved state road?).

      The difference is that people can report problems with Google Maps and Google fixes them in a matter of about a month (I know this from experience, I have several dozen Google Maps corrections that have received relatively prompt attention).

      I know paper maps very well. I used to buy a Delorme Gazeteer every year. Fantastic maps, by the way, love 'em, and I don't leave home without one in the trunk as an emergency backup. But they only change once a year, and the map data on them is usually several months old by the time they go to publication. Which is fine, roads don't change a whole lot.

      But they do change, and even Delorme, good as they are, will make the occasional mistake.

      A printed map has the advantage of allowing (and even forcing) you to understand your entire route before you set out. I agree. But I've also had plenty of people ask for directions, folded map in hand, so terribly distracted trying to read each road sign to see where their turn is coming up that they nearly ran me down.

      The ideal is a competent copilot with excellent mapreading skills who is willing to devote 100% attention to every turn.

      The next best is a GPS with a few minutes taken up front to make sure the route is reasonable, then just focusing on driving the goddamned car while a voice tells you "Turn left in 500 meters". A voice that you have confidence ignoring when you have to, knowing you'll hear a petulant "ReCALCULATING" a few seconds after you deviate off its set course and the voice prompts will continue while you concentrate on actual driving tasks.

      Reading a paper map or scribbled complex directions yourself while trying to drive is far more dangerous and distracting than having a proper GPS.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    55. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's morons, sometimes a road starts out looking just like any other, then slowly as you continue it gets rougher and rougher, then gravel, then it just goes away. With the GPS saying all's well the whole way.

      It's compounded by the fact that a lot of people have never been anywhere where you can die in hours sitting in your car AND there's no way to get help in that time.

    56. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      My point was when you use a 'map' you have to look at the route. Using a GPS it's calculated for you, and unless you dig into it, you just get the next segment presented to you, not the entire route.

      A map is 'big' (foldout). A GPS is small. You can't represent the same data. As such the map has more data but slower to process it. GPS is fast, but gives you less info about the trip.

      I generally use google maps at home before I leave so that I have a better idea of what to expect, and what I can expect my GPS to do given the general idea. But not everybody does this obviously.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    57. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      In my experience the "real" GPS apps on the iPhone can work totally independently of the cell network. They have preloaded maps, and while they *can* use tower assisted GPS for when they're out of satellite LOS, they don't need it. You definitely don't want to rely on the on board Google Maps app. It needs a regular Internet connection to get map data. I pay $25 a year for (Plus a one time $1 fee to get the app in the first place) for the MotionX GPS (drive) app. For that I get regular updates and the phone acts just like a normal car navigation GPS. Considering that most dedicated GPS companies want more than that just for map updates and I have to buy the device, it seems worth it. It'll also provide walking routes, which was really nice when I visited Boston. Better still for an extra $2 I also have their off-road GPS that can be used while hiking and boating.

      I would really want to get one of those battery based speed chargers if i was going to use the thing for off road navigation though.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    58. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      We invented headlights a long time ago, for just this reason (so we can see in front of the car in the dark). I can see getting lost, coming to the end of a pier thinking it is a bridge or some such, but not driving off the end of a pier into the water, that's just stupidity..

    59. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by LostAlaska · · Score: 1

      Agreed. GPS units don't have a mind of their own, please use yours.

    60. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that's different from any other breakdown exactly how?

      GPS reduces some of the consequences of doing things in the outdoors, so people engage in riskier behavior than they otherwise would. It's called "moral hazard".

      For example, I can use GPS to navigate to almost anywhere in the US, including some places that almost never see people. To flesh out the example a little more, I've worked the last couple of summers in Yellowstone. There are some interesting places there that don't have trails going to them. A GPS can lead the dumbest tourist several miles away from any people. And as long as things go well, it can lead them back.

      The problem is when things don't go well. The top three things are breaking or losing the only GPS they had, getting hurt, and getting bad weather or staying till after dark. In the first case, too often there's no backup plan, if the GPS stops working. Nobody made even a basic effort to memorize landmarks or bring a map.

      Second, if you break something, get a bad case of diarrhea from the local parasites, or come down with an altitude/exertion related medical condition (way too common in high altitude areas), then it's possible for you to end up in a situation where either your group has to split up (and there's only one GPS to go around) or if you were soloing, you get to stay put for a few days and hope someone finds you in the middle of nowhere before you die.

      And bad weather can kill the unprepared fast even if they know exactly where they are. Cross country hiking can be much slower especially in low visibility weather than hiking on a trail (even worse it can be highly variable, if you accidentally run into dense vegetation or rocky terrain that you bypassed on the way in). And I always carry a flashlight (with batteries that can last a full night) just in case I don't make it back before dark.

      Sure, dumb people can get into major trouble, just following regular trails. But GPS allows them to get into trouble in the middle of nowhere, where nobody would think of looking for them, making any bad situation more lethal. GPS doesn't help as much to get them out of trouble. Hence, the problem.

    61. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      Is it likewise deceitful of pedestrian lights to indicate you can walk across the street without having explained you should look both ways?

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    62. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupider

      So, you own a Garmin then?

    63. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      The newer version of Google Maps, at least for Android, can cache your route information and route data so if your Internet connection goes down, you still have route information available.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    64. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sortius_nod · · Score: 2

      Assuming that everyone is stupid isn't a bad thing in this day and age.

      I grew up with a father who taught me how to read maps, read wind, navigate via the stars, etc. My dad was a sailor from a young age, as I was. Maybe this is why even without a warning on a GPS/phone I wouldn't trust it over maps and local knowledge. I live in Australia where we laugh at tourists who drive off into the desert and have themselves killed due to not taking extra fuel, water, and the like. Being so sparsely populated does mean we don't rely on tech to get us where we're going.

      Case in point, I was camping last week, the GPS refused to work in the valleys and forests in the Otways (south western Victoria), I didn't just aimlessly drive, I used my knowledge of the area and maps to get around in the dirt roads. If I wasn't smart enough to do this we'd have been trapped with no mobile coverage and no way of knowing how to get out.

    65. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know where you heard that, but it's not "apparent" at all. Sorry, but it's simply not true.

      aGPS is only dependent on cell towers for the initial GPS lock, and only speeds up that lock from the traditional GPS approach by using approximate location data. aGPS without cell tower = GPS. The GPS radio itself is not dependent in any way on the cell radio.

      When any GPS receiver first starts up, it needs to know what satellites to look for. Not all birds are visible from all locations. Traditional GPS just picks a handful of common and evenly-scattered satellite frequencies and starts listening until it gets its first lock. Then it starts listening for satellites that are known to be close to the one it found. When it has 3-4 of them, it has a good idea of where it is and can narrow down the rest and start giving you decent accuracy. This process takes time (in some old GPS units, several minutes).

      On my old Magellan Meridian, it would actually ask you what state you were in at start-up to help narrow down the search, and accurately identifying your state could cut 1-2 minutes off start-up (without this initial hint, it could take up to 5 minutes to get a "first lock" even with a clear view of the sky). So that was an example of early "assisted GPS", where I was the "assist" mechanism.

      What's even worse is when your GPS tries to remember where it was, and you've moved somewhere else while the GPS receiver was powered off. Once, on a trip from Maine to Texas, I powered down my Meridian in Maine before boarding the plane, then fired it up in Texas and it took nearly 10 minutes for the GPS to conclude that it needed to ask me approximately where it was. It kept trying to broaden the search for satellites but never widened the net enough to include a bird that's visible from Texas because it assumed I was in Maine. When I told it I was in Texas, it took less than 2 minutes to get an initial lock.

      If you can figure out where you are very quickly, the GPS can skip that whole up-front search because it can send a quick ping to a local tower or two and figure out your location to within a few dozen miles in a matter of a few seconds. Knowing where you are that accurately means it can predict with really high confidence what satellites are in range, and start searching for them up front. So the "assisted" part pings towers, gets your rough location (which, by the way, Google Maps on the Blackberry and iPhone shows you while the GPS is still trying to get a lock), then feeds that information into the GPS as a "hint" to tell it what satellites to search for.

      If you are outside cell range, the aGPS just becomes a plain old GPS. Still works just fine, just takes a little longer for that initial lock. About the same as it would if you had a non-assisted GPS, assuming the two units have similar antennas and similar processors, of course.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    66. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by LordNacho · · Score: 2

      Over here in Britain, there's been several stories about people who've followed the GPS directions into a body of water.

      Google it ..."gps drive into lake". Seems to be a worldwide phenomenon.

    67. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Indeed. These stories are probably apocryphal.

    68. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I remember those systems. Each and every truck driver that tried to drive down my long, very narrow, dead-end road and came up to the LOCKED GATE that led to the airport security perimeter road would show me his screen from that, somehow expecting that if I were only to comprehend that his GPS was right and the physical world was wrong, he could save the 1/2 mile backup down a narrow road with cars parked on both sides and the 12-mile drive around to the other side of the airport.

      To be fair, that was only about 1/3 of the drivers. The rest had expensive-looking maps, or directions from their trucking companies, or the occasional printout from MapQuest.

      Maps, whether printed or electronic, can be wrong.

      PS: That was almost a decade ago. The goddamned map is still wrong. I wonder if the new resident has to deal with equally-upset truck drivers to this day?

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=nashua,+nh&aq=&sll=43.924836,-69.925726&sspn=0.010849,0.027874&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Nashua,+Hillsborough,+New+Hampshire&ll=42.790027,-71.526715&spn=0.002764,0.006968&t=h&z=18

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    69. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agreed. IF your idiot GPS is leading you down a road your car isn't designed to drive on (and most POS modern cars can't even handle a good sized pothole, let alone a forest road designed for logging trucks) then *turn around*, drive back to the pavement, stop, and adjust your GPS settings for MAJOR ROADS ONLY.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    70. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      As long as you aren't forced to divert from it in an area without data connection... (and I wonder, what happens if the phones reboots / etc.?)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    71. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      I think he meant "disadvantaged" as in "SAT score handicapped".

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    72. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by khallow · · Score: 2

      He made a couple of bad decisions, and it cost him his life.

      The thing is, those decisions were really bad. And I don't just mean the consequences.

    73. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by farnz · · Score: 3, Informative

      A bigger problem over here in old blighty is articulated lorries getting stuck by driving down roads that are too narrow or otherwise unsuitable. One big problem in this case is it's virtually impossible to turn a lorry on a narrow road. So if the road starts looking bad the choices are to carry on and hope they don't get stuck, try to reverse out (very slow and likely to require a second person) or tow the lorry out.

      In America, there are GPS maps created by commercial services for sale to the trucking industry. These maps include weight restrictions, width and height restrictions, truck routes, diesel fuel truck stops, tire and service centers, all kinds of information that is specific to the driving of big rigs. I would assume you have similar services available over there. But if your ordinary trucker thinks he can just drop a $99 Garmin on his dashboard and use it to drag a 30 tonne trailer to wherever he wants, well, that's almost as foolish as trying to cross two hundred miles of desert because there's a little blue line on the screen.

      The same class of GPS map is sold in the UK; the problem is that they cost more than the cheap car GPS units. Taking Garmin as a sample manufacturer, the cheapest car unit they sell here is £99. The cheapest truck unit is £259. A trucker buying a GPS unit on his own dime because he's a bit unsure about how best to get to his destination, but isn't brave enough to ask the office to get the maps out is going to buy the £99 unit. And then he's going to foul up; if it wasn't such a problem for the rest of us, it'd just be funny.

    74. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by FreeBSD+evangelist · · Score: 1

      That's to get ETA and other computed information. Plus, higher-end units have real-time traffic and road hazard information displayed.

      Don't assume that because you don't understand why someone does something that they are stupid.

    75. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by toddles666 · · Score: 1

      When I visited England about 5 years ago, I noticed the plethora of roadway signs. There are warning signs for everything: deer crossing, duck crossing, rabbit crossing, frog crossing, tank crossing, Dalek crossing (I'm not kidding). There are even warning signs for warning signs:

      Sign: "Warning, bumps ahead!"
      Me: What are the bumps for?
      Sign w/ bumps: "Warning, reduce speed to enter roundabout"
      Me: Sheesh...

    76. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 2

      There's more to it, aGPS often offloads actual calculations onto its servers, gets precise time from cell network or downloads via gprs ephemeris data otherwise (slowly...) updated via signals from the sats.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    77. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It can be tricky to see the depth of snow on a road. Uniform white snow breaks depth perception, especially in dusk/dawn light conditions (dim enough that vision is reduced, but light enough that your headlights aren't helpful.). I've driven in central Canadian winters for 8 years and it can still screw with you at times, especially on familiar roads, doubly so when the drifts weren't there yesterday.

      It can also be tricky to tell where exactly the edge of the road is.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    78. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by toddles666 · · Score: 2

      "Then, during the Third Reconciliation of the Last of the Meketrex Supplicants, they chose a new form for him, that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of a Sloar that day, I can tell you!" - Vinz Clortho

    79. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should stop thinking of this as a problem, but as a solution. As in, "What do we do with all the people who blindly trust whatever 'the gadget' says, and don't employ any critical thought in the process?" Kind of like: this bash comment.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    80. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell me about it. 30 years in Alaska.

      But still, the guy obviously knew nothing about winter driving in rural area, yet he drove his family into into this situation due to pride. I guarantee his wife was begging him to turn around for for an hour before they got stuck.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    81. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by aethogamous · · Score: 1

      Roads just don't change that frequently.

      That is true, but whether or not they are passable does, especially in remote areas.

    82. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      don't know where you heard that, but it's not "apparent" at all.
      I heard it on /.

      assuming the two units have similar antennas and similar processors, of course.
      Which is a rather big assumption, a cellphone GPS receiver is likely to be an extreme budget unit using whatever antenna they could squeeze in among the antenna(s) for the cellular functionality.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    83. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      I hope you also wear a leather vest and your hat has crocodile teeth in it

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    84. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Just because you don't understand how the world is not homogeneous, doesn't mean that every place has any useful GPS traffic or road hazard information. On an ubermain road with target town visible.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    85. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, no, Kim would probably have been better off with a GPS. They used a paper map, not a GPS. Not only that, they used a highway map, which are piss-poor at covering back roads, yet they chose to use back roads anyway.

      More importantly, it was misreading of that map that led them down a hunting road and eventually got them stuck. The side road they selected to avoid going to a higher elevation was, in fact, a dead-end, and any half-assed GPS would have told them that. The problem was they didn't know exactly where they were, and their highway map probably didn't cover the area in sufficient detail even if they did. They took a road that looked like it stayed at a lower elevation.

      Even more critical was Kim's misreading of the map that convinced him that a town was 4 miles away. Even the piss-poorest of GPS units would given him better information. Of course, leaving the car with inadequate gear to keep him warm was a bad idea, too, but given the situation he was in, probably the best he could do. I think I would have ripped up a car seat or two for the foam insulation, though...

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    86. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      I think Paper Maps tend to be better at given a big picture than a GPS. You cant but help see the direction and class of roads, where the towns are etc.

      A GPS because of its small screen tends to present a lot of information at small scales but presents relatively little information at medium to large scales. The information is there, but you have to scroll around to find it.

      When it comes to reviewing information on a GPS, I think the phrase "can't see the wood for the trees" has a lot of relevance.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    87. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming ignorance where the problem is probably misadventure.

    88. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I lived in Oregon for seven years and spent a lot of time outdoors. The Siskiyous are bad mountains. They're high, they're rugged, few people live there, and they're right on the coast so they get buckets of precipitation. In winter even I-5 through the Siskiyous can be dangerous. If you aren't from the immediate area in winter you need to let people know where you're going, how you're going to get there, and stick with the plan. A state highway there is going to be a small two lane road with twists and turns and not much of a shoulder. A main forest service road is generally two lane, but not necessarily better than gravel, and it's comparative narrowness versus a state road will be obvious. One-lane gravel logging roads like the one he went down can be so narrow and so overgrown that you could simultaneously be scraping both sides of your vehicle on the brush. The series of decisions leading him onto a one-lane gravel logging road in the mountains in winter were not the only bad decisions he made. His worst decision was that he started the trip completely unprepared. Tennis shoes and a light jacket was pure foolishness given his destination on the Oregon coast in November. Warm clothes would have been obvious, as would rain gear for when it's not snowing: if you want a shower on the Oregon coast in winter just stick a bar of soap on your head, stand outside, and wait five minutes. Rain gear plus a winter coat, boots, hat, and gloves for every member of the party would still only be minimal preparation. He planned to go through I-5's 4,310 foot pass in late November without these things, plus a couple blankets/sleeping bags in the car, food, water, a snow shovel for digging out the car if necessary, and probably didn't have tire chains either. Actually for the forest service main road he eventually went on a chainsaw should be considered essential equipment for six months of the year due to the likelihood of encountering trees downed across the road from the winter storms. While Mr. Kim might have been very bright he made poor decisions in such number and severity it shows an extreme and sadly fatal lack of common sense.

    89. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      So did the GPS fail because you're on the bottom side of the earth?

      (jk)

      It's really easy to rely totally on the GPS and get burned. Case in point: If you use it to go to a hotel far away at a place you've never been, and then use it to go to a different place from the hotel, and the battery dies, GOOD LUCK GETTING BACK TO THE HOTEL. (been there done that) The gps works only when the battery is charged. We had a problem with the 12v power plug and couldn't charge in the car.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    90. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Except in Death Valley where both the Dashboard Units are failing and commonsense is failing because of unwavering faith in the infallibility of Dashboard GPS units.

    91. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if reductio ad absurdum is a productive way in approaching road traffic (or generally societal) hiccups...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    92. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by CoderJoe · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the dreaded trap street...

    93. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

      This should be encouraged. I never understand why people are always wanting to go out of their way to prevent stupid people from killing themselves.

    94. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing lorries with roadtrains, they are quite different.
      If I need a cab I don't call for a sandwich.

    95. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      This is just Natural Selection at work. The same thing happens here in Australia when vehicles break down, people think they can walk across the dessert.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    96. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by icebike · · Score: 1

      I've driven 178. The Dashboard unit did not fail. It never lost satellite lock. Not once.
      Since I was playing tourist, I didn't venture off of the pavement. But these units do not fail JUST because they enter Death Valley.

      Stop trying to blame technology when human stupidity is the sole cause of the problem.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    97. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I'd love to have a GPS that had topo data as well. These road maps are useless when trying to figure out grade, etc.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    98. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      "The article requested is not available."

      Try again.

      Second link is all sorts of special though. What kind of truck driver does that shit?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    99. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      "All of the Garmin Nuvi GPS units I have had have a warning screen that shows every single time that it is turned on saying this."

      My TomTom doesn't do that... does that mean Garmin assumes their buyers are stupider or that TomTom isn't worried about being sued?

      If the bodies self dispose, then the suit is more difficult.

    100. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Probably because that's a retarded way of phrasing it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    101. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only relies on that at the start of the route. It downloads the route info that it needs at that time. Of course if you go out of signal area and THEN deviate from the route you are out of luck.

    102. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I'm not a Californian, but it sounds like it's slightly more tricky to use GPS to get to a specific destination within the park than it is to get from one half of 178 to the other half of it.

      I think the point the rangers were making is that there are a lot of old closed, impeded or disused roads that most GPS databases include in their maps when attempting to navigate from place to place within the park.

      And yes, it is the fault of people who don't take into account that GPS systems like normal maps can have aged data. You don't blame a map for getting lost, but to claim that a GPS is 100% accurate all the time is exactly the type of thing this article is warning people against.

    103. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      wow...

      He -did- have his lights on right? He drove downhill into the water. How did he not notice it!?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    104. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      If you drive truck for a living, you know exactly what that means.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    105. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by The+Grand+Falloon · · Score: 2

      I actually take particular note of well-thought-out warning labels. For example, my sons have a number of telescoping plastic lightsabers. Nowhere on the lightsaber does it say, "Don't hit people with this." It does say, "Don't poke or jab people or animals with the lightsaber," and then goes on to explain that it's designed not to collapse too easily, so a thrust can cause unexpected injury. That's wonderful. They knew damn well kids (and their dads) would be hitting each other with these things, but they had a genuine safety issue to address. Rather than cover their asses and say, "Don' hit people," they explained how not to hit people and why. They also possessed the insight to realize that they couldn't put both warnings on there, because if you're ignoring one label, you're probably going to ignore all of them.

    106. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I always get a full summary of the route when I use GPS. I can then see where the route goes in general and check pieces for weirdness or plot alternatives. I also hate turn navigation - it always yaks at me and hijacks the display. What I want is far more low key.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    107. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Frankenshteen · · Score: 1

      The least adapted perish. Its called Darwin.

      --
      "It's a doughnut stuffed with M&M's. That way when you finish the doughnut, you don't have to eat any M&M's."
    108. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by moxley · · Score: 1

      I agree - that was extremely sad..

      It's not like that situation happened all at once, bad decisions aren't the excluive domain of morons. In survival situations most of the time it's small trivial decisions that then exponentially compound each other down the line that get you into very dangerous situations.

    109. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Velex · · Score: 1

      Couldn't tell ya, but all that I know about this subject is that TomTom wants me to believe that as a man, I'm completely incapable of navigating without their product.

      Unfortunately for them, I've driven a big truck in 45 states, and I'm pretty sure that paper maps are sufficient for my navigation needs. I've considered buying a GPS for geocaching, but TomTom's commercials have guaranteed that if I do buy a GPS, it won't be one of theirs.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    110. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      more like human nature rather than human stupidity.

      when we developed written language, we freed ourselves of having to remember our own histories.

      now we have GPS, we're in the process of freeing ourselves from the need to know where we are and where we're going.

      this is stupid of course, but you can't expect it not to happen, or assume anyone who is misled by a GPS is stupid.

      i've had several run-ins with GPS units (all overseas), and in all cases where there's a problem it is because the GPS is 100% correct, and completely useless.

      like when it said "turn right in 5 metres and arrive at destination on left", when it was referring to cobblestone stairs up a very narrow footpath. the density of roads in this area (the Albaicin, Granada, Spain) and relative elevations (which the GPS was unaware of), meant i had to follow it blindly for ages before we actually got where we needed to be. the local maps were not useful, the local people didn't know what my wife or I were talking about (even in our best Spanish, which is rudimentary).

      a day or two later we found ourselves walking downhill and finding the exact spot we were in. the GPS was absolutely correct, but didn't realise the road was not wide enough and was in fact a staircase. the map was at fault (yes, we should have got out and walked at that point and saved a couple of hours finding a road path).

      another time in New Zealand we're driving down a highway between towns and the GPS politely but firmly said "please return to the nearest road". it showed on it's screen that we were plowing through an empty field. we were in fact on a road and hadn't made a turn for about 10 mins - the road just dropped off it's map.

      another time, also in New Zealand we were directed by the GPS down a road that was exclusively for buses. we got a large fine. there weren't really signs about so we had no idea - the GPS's map should have though.

      next time i'll get a paper map...

    111. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin works! Thats good.

    112. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by plover · · Score: 1

      First, GPS trucker equipment comes with a caution that you still have to use them with your good judgment. If you see a sign that says 11'8", you'd better believe it. The mapmakers don't claim that they're perfect. They do claim, however, that if the GPS saves you from just one tow, ticket, rescue, or low clearance bridge, that the device was more than worth the money you paid for it.

      Yes, maps are not perfect. But at least the electronic maps can improve with age, if people bother to report failures and problems.

      And I'm not sure why you're complaining about "the goddamned map", either. I zoomed out from the exact Google link you posted above, and changed to map view, and I could clearly see that Deerwood Drive does NOT connect to Perimeter Road. Google doesn't try to link them as a through route, as you can see when you ask it to route between your old road and the airport's road:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=Deerwood+Dr&daddr=Perimeter+Rd&geocode=FSXUjAIdoZO8-w%3BFePQjAId3J28-w&hl=en&mra=mift&mrsp=1&sz=16&sll=42.784173,-71.525888&sspn=0.013669,0.025578&ie=UTF8&ll=42.78452,-71.52518&spn=0.013669,0.025578&t=h&z=16

      Google reports the route between the two dead ends is 4.2 miles long. So either find another error to complain about, or maybe you need to accept that people actually do fix problems. Shocking, I know, but it happens.

      --
      John
    113. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way: auto lots will have some cheap vehicles with GPS features in March.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    114. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by plover · · Score: 1

      The same class of GPS map is sold in the UK; the problem is that they cost more than the cheap car GPS units. Taking Garmin as a sample manufacturer, the cheapest car unit they sell here is £99. The cheapest truck unit is £259. A trucker buying a GPS unit on his own dime because he's a bit unsure about how best to get to his destination, but isn't brave enough to ask the office to get the maps out is going to buy the £99 unit. And then he's going to foul up; if it wasn't such a problem for the rest of us, it'd just be funny.

      I think the general topic of the discussion being "stupid people are stupid" applies equally well here. Being too stupid to buy the right tool for the job is little different than following the GPS directions into an alley posted "DEAD END - NO TRUCKS", or into the sands of a desert that isn't posted anything at all except "DEATH VALLEY".

      --
      John
    115. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      I actually take particular note of well-thought-out warning labels. . . .

      That's the thing, isn't it? One well-thought warning is worth thousands of CYAs. But the ratio of CYAs to useless warnings is too high. My problem is I become so inured by the useless warnings or some products, I sometimes miss the important ones on others . . .

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    116. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by quenda · · Score: 2

      There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

      Yep, anyone who leaves the city without maps, sextant and chronometer deserves what they get.

    117. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forrest Gump: Stupid is as stupid does.

      In this case an otherwise intelligent educated person qualified for the Darwin award. Lot's of smart people do stupid things. Some MORONs do some really smart things, especially the rednecks that live in these areas and have to rescue the smart people after doing stupid things.

      from the wikipedia link
      'Because of Mr. Kim's background as a technology analyst, observers speculated that the family had used online mapping to find their route.[16] However, Mrs. Kim told state police that they had used a paper road map,[17] an account supported by the Oregon State Police, which reported that the Kims had used an official State of Oregon highway map.[18] Mrs. Kim later recounted that, after they had been stuck for four days and were studying the map for help, both she and Mr. Kim noticed that a box in the corner of the map bore the message: "Not all Roads Advisable, Check Weather Conditions."[19]'

      Speculation * misinformation after his death = not good taste.

    118. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how much it would help. There was a railroad bridge where I grew up that would consistently peel the tops of tractor trailers/delivery trucks open like a can of sardines. There was a plain sign and trucks kept getting ripped open. Then they got a bigger sign and painted the side of the bridge fluorescent and trucks kept getting ripped open. Then they added 3 more signs with flashing yellow lights and trucks are still hitting it. It honestly looks like the Vegas strip with all the shiny crap they got and the drivers still just slam right into it. I'm pretty sure the only way to get them to stop would be to hire a good looking woman to stand there full time and when she sees an overly tall truck to stick her thumb out and flash it. I keep writing the city about it but for some reason they don't like my suggestion.

    119. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Las Vegas has winters?

    120. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Deerwood Drive ends / Perimeter Road begins at the railroad tracks up near where all the houses/apartments/businesses are, not at the new tiedown spot as pictured. If you look at the Google Street View, you can actually see the fence just after the railroad tracks (look at the second-to-last image at the end of actual Deerwood). That's the problem, trucks thought they could "cut through" to the end of Deerwood to get to Perimeter Road. Point "A" on your map is actually on Perimeter Road, and if you had a car there you'd likely encounter some unpleasant fellows with a poor sense of humor asking how you got through the fence.

      That tie-down area didn't exist when I lived there and flew out of that airport, so at the time Deerwood extended and was pictured as connecting to Perimeter Road. I see there's a break there now, which means autorouting no longer works, which is good. But the map still shows a stretch of restricted-area road as being public access.

      I just reported it as a problem (Google Earth did not exist when I lived there, and I was frankly surprised Google was still wrong after all these years, but they do have a good track record of correcting map data).

      Regardless, the point is that the difference between the $99 Garmin and the $??? fancy GPS is a matter of amount of data, not necessarily of accuracy of said data.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    121. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Yes, "Death by lack of judgement" would be more accurate. Why don't we blame SUVs for this trend? It's not as if most of the deaths are people on foot.

    122. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      True, it might speed things up a bit, but the assertion was that aGPS is somehow unreliable ("struggles to get a signal") without it. It struggles no harder than your average standalone GPS. The assist makes the initial lock faster than the average lock time on an unassisted GPS, that's all.

      Yes, losing the "assist" can slow down initial lock, but after the initial lock is received all of them work just fine and dandy regardless of cell coverage. And my Blackberry can acquire an initial lock without the assist in about the same time it takes any regular standalone GPS to get a lock.

      As I said, aGPS - cell towers = GPS.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    123. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Not to sound like an advert for Delorme, but you might want to feast your eyes on the third screenshot in this advert...

      http://shop.delorme.com/OA_HTML/DELibeCCtdItemDetail.jsp?item=30536&section=10461

      I've held that little beauty in my hands, and if my company-issue Blackberry didn't come with all the mapping I need I'd own one of those.

      Disclaimer: Delorme's corporate headquarters and retail store are a few tens of miles from where I live. I have a couple of friends and family members who work there.

      Doesn't change the fact that, as far as I'm concerned, if you want to pay money for a mapping product Delorme is way up at the top of my list - their Gazeteers are just plain awesome and I carry one in my car - always.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    124. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by adolf · · Score: 1

      This is why I carry multiple portable GPS units (one Garmin with built-in maps that may not be current, one Droid with online maps that more likely are current), a laptop with GPS (again with built-in maps), a 12v battery pack/jump start kit with a cig plug outlet (redundancy), a knife (everyone should carry one), and some 3M electrical tape (insulate those splices!) with me whenever I travel by car: As long as the car lives, I don't get lost. And even after the car dies, it'll be a long, long time before I lose navigation for any unreasonable length of time.

      (Caveat: I don't generally travel too far off of the beaten path, and most of Ohio is far too dense (even the "rural" areas) to even begin to get dangerously lost in.)

      Meanwhile, as long as we're in the context of hotels and actual civilization: There's always the old-fashioned method, wherein you pop into a nearby convenience store or gas station and ask for directions and/or buy a paper map.

      Before GPS I used this latter method, generally with great success. I haven't needed to use it for a few years, but I'm sure it still works as well as it used to.

    125. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Meski · · Score: 1

      GPS: "Turn left at the next exit."

      GPS: "So long, sucker"

    126. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by adolf · · Score: 1

      I've seen it, too. However:

      My Garmin Nuvi is switched on, right now, attached to the windshield of my BMW (which is just sitting in the driveway).

      And when I drive it again, tomorrow or the next day, it will still be on.

      Why? Sometimes it's useful. And in those times of potential usefulness, it takes *forever* for it to boot up and become usable if it has been switched off. It's simply a practical matter (and yes, I'm perfectly capable of wiring the thing turn on and off with the ignition, or with a delay, or whatever -- I just think it's better how it is).

      Of course, it's configured to automatically adjust itself to the dimmest of dims, with the darkest of dark backgrounds, whenever the sun sets (wherever I am). It is consequently never blinding, and I also adjust the angle of the display to minimize nighttime brightness. And it's mounted up high, nearly behind the mirror, so as to neither not block important sight lines nor substantially ruin my view of the road when I do glance at the GPS.

      But, yeah: I see these folks driving around with a white background on a GPS set to MAXIMUM DAYLIGHT-READABLE TORCH MODE all the time, too. Usually, these are the same clowns that keep their dashboard lighting turned all the way up at night (ostensibly so they can see the displays, but without regard for seeing their dark surroundings).

      As puzzling as it all is, I don't let it bother me -- instead, I see it as a feature: A gleaming indication of an idiotic and inattentive driver, beckoning me to avoid them, like a lighthouse signalling the presence of a dangerous outcropping -- a message of imminent destruction.

      Observe your surroundings -- don't expect your surroundings to observe you.

    127. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by wesleyjconnor · · Score: 1
      THANKYOU

      good god how do we not have this yet, i use google maps on my phone and it desperately needs this.

      Or even a 'cache everything im going to need for this trip while im at home and have free internet' option

    128. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by wesleyjconnor · · Score: 1

      there arent many of your kind around here

    129. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by adolf · · Score: 1

      I generally carry Google Maps with me in my pocket on my Droid, and I enjoy the occasionally challenging road (even in my low-slung 325i, damage be damned) -- driving for fun is fun, for me.

      But anyway, it's not a matter of the directions being wrong (even if they are), but of people being idiots. I've had bad GPS directions before, and I simply ignore them and keep moving in the direction of sanity and let the GPS figure out my intentions.

      The conversation goes something like this when it happens to me:

      GPS: Turn right toward Rocky Creek Bridge.
      Me: You stupid bitch! There's no bridge here! *keeps driving down main road*
      GPS: Recalculating.
      GPS: *finally reveals sane route*
      Me: About time.

      Usually, this just means that my calculated ETA gets pushed back by a few minutes, which isn't a problem. Worst case is that she (the GPS lady) is particularly insistent on giving bad advice, and then I just mute her before use her own maps to get where I'm going without her direct guidance.

      Meanwhile: If someone with zero wits tries to cross a non-existent bridge over Rocky Creek just because their GPS told them to, then I guess that's just Darwin at work.

    130. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Android devices (as well as IOS devices, including the lowly first-gen iPod Touch) can also triangulate position based on available Wifi and/or cellular signals, as long as it has a data connection.

      In my experience, this completely non-GPS location data is eerily accurate.

      A few years ago when I first got my hands on an iPod Touch, I took it for a walk in the country. Ever-curious about mapping and Wifi, I pulled it out of my pocket with a couple of farmhouses in sight, found an open access point, and connected to it.

      I then instructed the thing to find my location. It did. It wasn't spot-on, but it was within several hundred feet, which is quite good enough for most practical applications.

      Some years later, I pulled my Droid out inside of a downtown Chicago highrise hotel, and it pegged my location within about 10 yards after just a few seconds, completely without a GPS fix. I moved to a different area of the building, and it did the same. It doesn't seem to update very quickly in this mode -- about every 15 seconds -- but that's probably more to limit database loading than anything else.

      Later that same day, I walked downtown Chicago to see the stuff I wanted to see before I had to head home. I used Google Maps to get me from A to B. The GPS radio was off during most of this, and the phone stayed mostly in my pocket, but when I did refer back to it it would consistently get my location with definitely-useful accuracy in seconds...and, again, without a GPS fix (I wasn't about to go wasting battery power waiting for THAT, even if aGPS can make it somewhat faster, since my non-GPS location was perfectly sufficient).

      It ain't just plain-old GPS on modern handsets, and simple aGPS is not the end of the rainbow.

    131. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just makes them even MORE of a MORON.

    132. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Maybe it should just have a moron mode as a default factory setting, that it only mildly difficult to turn off. When on it that won't allow them to put in destinations that are more than 5 miles from their home. That should keep 95% of the idiots using GPS from straying to far away.

    133. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      then slowly as you continue it gets rougher and rougher, then gravel, then it just goes away.

      And then maybe you... TURN AROUND?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    134. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by adolf · · Score: 1

      ...and for a week after they got stuck.

      I live in Ohio. It's not Oregon, and it sure isn't Alaska, but it's still easy for me to tell when I'm in an area that has received heavy snow (it's built up all around a well-plowed road), and thus similarly easy to tell when I encounter a snow-covered road that hasn't been so well maintained (it's simply looks too smooth and white to be passable).

      FWIW. And sorry about your luck, James and family.

    135. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Narcogen · · Score: 1

      You seem to be confusing real dashboard GPS units with cellphones.

      They are far from the same. A typical Dashboard GPS has all the maps onboard.
      They also offers route defaults that favor major roads (shortest time), and these never lead you into trouble other than temporary weather or construction delays. Maps may become obsolete over several years. Roads just don't change that frequently.

      And these dashboard units are seldom ever "Wrong" as to your location, and don't rely on any cellular signals. There are the occasional blind spots (city canyons), but these are temporary. If you go thru a tunnel you may lose signals, but the better GPS units realize this, and realize you really can't get lost in a tunnel, and simply revert to estimation till you emerge from the tunnel.

      As for wide open desert spaces, the dashboard GPS units don't fail. Common sense fails.

      I don't think anyone was attributing these "failures" to the GPS giving an incorrect location-- just giving an impassable route. The story notes that some GPS units have roads that have been inaccessible for 40 years, and yes, some roads, especially unpaved ones, do change that often.

      "Lost" in this case does not refer to not knowing where you are, because whether you are navigating with a map or a GPS or by dead reckoning, knowing where you are is only the first step in trying to get from where you were to where you want to be. Dashboard GPS units, good ones, also have preferences that choose between shortest and fastest routes, allow for various avoidances and preferences for highways. Judicious use of such options would certainly eliminate some of these errors, where a marginal route is given for a destination simply because it is the shortest.

      Another problem would seem to by that while mapping applications have lots of different kinds of metadata to assign to roads-- speed limits, traffic, road conditions, hazards like construction, there doesn't seem to be any flag for a road being unpaved in an area where passability shifts often and where local environmental conditions are extremely hazardous. Such a feature might be useful, as would be the kind of communication the article describes between people who know the areas (park rangers) and geolocation services vendors.

    136. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      It's not so much of a Lorri driver plopping down a cheap Garmin, it's more due to the fact that most of the roads in England can be easily described as "quaint" and "scenic" which is Latin for "sucks giant goat balls".

      In the sixities and the seventies England there were massive road project just like in the US, but most were killed beyond a few major motorways after people freaked out about what it was doing to towns and the country side.

      England is mostly little villages scattered everywhere. Diverting traffic around them means the death of the local service industry and going through them means destroying not just one but dozens of villages for every 100 or so miles of road.

      The Lorrie (truck drivers) have no choice but to take the little roads, since there usually the only way to get to most towns. Think about how much of a stink people make about runing a road through a 50-100 year old area of a town in the US and now image how people would react to that if they were 500-800+ year old towns (like nearly every thing is) in England.

    137. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      You don't really need, or have use of, GPS for long-distance driving between largish cities. Because you do that by following the main roads anyway, and those are both very visible on any map (even a poor-scale one), generally well-signed, have good phone-coverage and frequent traffic -- all of which contributes to making GPS fairly useless.

      GPS is, on the other hand, enormously useful for the last ~20 miles in a large city. You can't possibly miss "Berlin" with or without a GPS, but it's a lot easier to find a specific address in Berlin with one - particularily if you're alone in the car, because reading the map and driving at once is tricky with a papermap. (also, if the gps dies, it's harmless)

      GPS is also both enormously useful - and very dangerous - in conditions that make navigation difficult. Useful because if and when it works, it is much superior to the alternatives (tried navigating by compass and papermap in a white-out in the mountains, or in thick fog at sea?) - but dangerous because it can fail, either by dying outright, or worse, by giving wrong results. (for example when there's reflections from nearby vertical surfaces) Thinking you know precisely where you are, but actually being somewhere else, can be deadly both at sea and in the mountains.

    138. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, the main problem mentioned wasn't GPS over papermaps, as such. But rather a general lack of respect for the conditions.

      It's just plain idiotic to plan to go off the main-roads in death valley (I'd argue even ON the main-roads) without bringing ample drinking-water, for example. It's not *difficult* to toss a 10-gallon can of water into the trunk for such a trip. And not doing it, is equally stupid with papermaps or gps.

    139. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by plover · · Score: 1

      I should think a decent trucker GPS would therefore be more useful in England than in America. Our city streets have signs indicating "Truck Route", and it just takes a small bit of reading to know which way trucks have to take. The signs won't point you down a street that can't handle a large rig. I recall London having a bunch of big streets that went straight and true for a while and then just ended at a goat-path. If the GPS could say "turn left BEFORE you get to the goat-path" that'd be a huge benefit.

      Or if you were driving through the countryside, wouldn't it be important to know which of the town's roads would be better for truck traffic (assuming that a town has more than one route through it?)

      --
      John
    140. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Niiice.

      I think I know what I'm looking at next time I have cash to spend.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    141. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd like to stress out that as a western European tourist, I didn't have the notion that there could be lethal wilderness in a developed country the first time I went to US. Of course now I understand the scale of it but please keep in mind that the idea you can get stuck somewhere more than a day of walk from a town is uncommon for some foreigners.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    142. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by catchy_handle · · Score: 1

      Awesome sentence! Beautiful, thanks.

    143. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by ggeens · · Score: 1

      "All of the Garmin Nuvi GPS units I have had have a warning screen that shows every single time that it is turned on saying this." My TomTom doesn't do that... does that mean Garmin assumes their buyers are stupider or that TomTom isn't worried about being sued?

      My TomTom showed me the disclaimer the first time I switched it on. They seem to assume the device is only used by a single person who is capable of remembering the warning.

      I used to have an in-car GPS that made me click through the disclaimer each time I used it. So instead of pushing one button, I had to push GPS and then OK. (And then wait until the system was loaded.)

      --
      WWTTD?
    144. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      But it can be also the case, especially in hard conditions. The server with which aGPS communicates is practically guaranteed to have fabulous visibility of the sats, can correlate this with not sufficient or otherwise confusing signals in, say, urban (or whatever the type) canyons.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    145. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or get a flat, or get stuck turning around, or can only back up because the expected area wide enough to turn around doesn't appear or any of a number of things.

    146. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by azalin · · Score: 1

      Feeling a little pedantic today, but "tossing" 10gallons of water in a can could be considered somewhat hard for the average slashdotter. Even with the kilogramm getting lighter these days. The Message remains of course: Don't go into a dessert without supplies and a backup plan. Even on a highway.

    147. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      your second wish has been granted. There are a number of iPhone apps which do allow you to download maps before you head out. Very classy. Garmin ought to be scared - the iPhone is a hell of a lot better GPS than my Oregon 400: better display, better GPS chip, better battery life (really!). The only advantage that the Garmin has is that it's completely waterproof and I can carry a passle of AA batteries with me.

      TomTom for iPhone has been out for years. I have used it already in about 10 countries, from the USA to Europe to New Zealand. It's not free, and needs quite a bit of storage space, but I can recommend it to anyone. It's very good at warning you about unpaved roads and such, and in general very accurate in any place I visited, even remote areas in the USA, Sweden and NZ. It has allowed me to find places that even with a good map I would otherwise have struggled to find.

      But I always also bring a map. I just like a good map. The Michelin maps of France are the best. They have a big advantage in that you can use them to plan a trip, before you know where you want to go, and they work without batteries.

      One problem I encountered is that some countries have no good maps available (Greece comes to mind). for the USA, the best thing I could find was Rand McNally, which wasn't great but good enough.

      The reason that GPS units are so popular is that most people can't read maps. These are the same people that fail to understand the limitations a GPS unit has, or even worse the navigation software on some phones, that only relies on the cell tower signals to figure out where it is or need to be online to work.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    148. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I've been using TomTom on the iPhone in a lot of different countries (USA, Europe, New Zealand). It's been great. Constant updates, completely offline mode, etc.

      I've got an iPhone dock in my own car, and use one of these holders that attach to the windscreen when abroad in a rental car.

      The iPhone 1&2 don't have a GPS unit, but can be used with the TomTom windscreen kit, as it has it's own GPS receiver.

      I have navigated in places were there certainly wasn't a cell tower anywhere near, and these work fine without one. The only thing is that if now powered the iPhone will run out of battery life in a 3-4 hours when using the GPS. My own iPhone dock and the TomTom windscren attached unit, have power supplied either though my radio, or though the cigarette lighter connection.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    149. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I've had MotionX GPS on my iPhone as well, but I prefer the TomTom application. I use some of the MotionX stuff to navigate and map my trips when walking though, TomTom doesn't do that.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    150. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The gps works only when the battery is charged.

      You say that like it's the GPS's fault. What do you think it runs off, magic fairy dust?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    151. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Years ago I wanted to drive to the top of a particular mountain. I had two maps from different companies. On one map the road was marked as a normal dirt road. On the other map it was marked as a 4WD track. I decided to believe the former rather than the latter because I wanted to get to the top of the mountain. It turned out the the road was more of a 4WD track and I bounced up and down on it in my station wagon. Fortunately I didn't get stuck and only had to replace the exhaust system on my car due to all the dents it got.

      That's a bit like having a GPS shout out "warning, do not continue, ravine ahead", continuing anyway, and getting annoyed when you fall in a ravine.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    152. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      It doesn't help that in britan we identify our roads based on how important they are in the network, not generally on how big they are.

      Yes, but we also have things like big roadside warning signs if a road is unsuitable for e.g. tall or wide vehicles. If drivers choose to ignore these, it is hard to see what else could be done apart from taking their licence off them.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    153. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If I turned up on foot to get a ferry, I'd sure as shit make sure there was a boat at the end of the gangplank before I started walking.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    154. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put. Hat's off to you sir.

    155. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But if you're well off and stupid, you are generally protected from the consequences of your own stupidity.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    156. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "I have found my self going down roads where if my GPS quit I would only have a vague idea of how to get home from that location."

      I also find myself quite often going into places I have no idea how to come back home without a GPS... But I don't use GPS (I don't even own one), asking for information won't kill you (ok, sometimes you should take care to ask the police, or it will).

      Anyway, that is interesting that people use more than half a gas tank going into a desert, or that they take their cars out of the road just because a machine told them to. I don't know how interesting, since some people are quite wiling to kill somebody else just because somebody told them to, so, I guess doing stupid things shouldn't qualify for heavy awesomeness. Anyway, it's a machine giving them orders, not some authority.

    157. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      There is a internationaly agreed standard yellow sign for that. But, yes, I know, people don't care about standards... And the "300m ahead" piece of information is pretty useless.

    158. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      No, you don't. If you take enough time with your eyes out of the road to read the sign you'll be able to guess, but that isn't how such information should be written.

    159. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Remember, these same people use Windows because of it's security and stability....

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    160. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      The gps works only when the battery is charged.

      You say that like it's the GPS's fault. What do you think it runs off, magic fairy dust?

      Nope, it was the car's fault for not having a working power plug. That, or it was the fairy's fault for not providing enough dust that day. Come on, fairy! I need to get places, you insensitive little winged clod!

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    161. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      There is a internationaly agreed standard yellow sign for that. But, yes, I know, people don't care about standards... And the "300m ahead" piece of information is pretty useless.

      Yellow signs? They're the US ones, I think, the Vienna Convention signs are used here.

      This is the sign (except it's height, not width).

    162. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by jackbird · · Score: 1

      There is no navigational aid more infuriating than a AAA triptick. Who thought a map that becomes useless as soon as you make a wrong turn was a good idea?

    163. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I'll have to try that with my iPod Touch gen 2. I've never tried location services with it.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    164. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      In the UK lorry drivers will stick to the blue (motorway) or green (primary route/A road) roads for 99% of the journey. They're not 12 lanes wide like in the US, but parking will be forbidden, and the signs are good.

      Some of London is 2000 years old, but there's still no problem (in principle) driving a lorry on any of the blue, green or orange routes on here. The vehicle will fit, and that'll get you very close to your destination -- usually you can get closer, but not always. In practise, lorries avoid driving in Central London during the day because there's so much other traffic. Most shops in Central London get deliveries at night, or very early in the morning.

    165. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      For my information, what do you like better about it? I've been generally pleased with MotionX (Like both of us mention the walking route thing is especially nice, it even knew about and took advantage of the paths through Boston Commons), but I'm always interested in seeing if there's something better out there.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    166. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      My GPS (Navigon) gives a high level display of the route too. The problem is it's a trip of 100 miles on a 4 inch screen. Not exactly helpful. If desired I can drill to the turn by turn route list, but that's still just a list of streets and distances.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    167. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by plover · · Score: 1

      "Warning! This Superman cape is only a costume, and does not enable the wearer to fly."

      --
      John
    168. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      Lol, natural selection, I guess. ;-)

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    169. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Don't always blame the truckers. I'd guess 95% of roads unsuitable for HGV access are not marked as such. I've come close to failure twice, both times when the main road was closed, and all traffic was just diverted off of it with no further directions. One of those times I spent about half the time moving branches from the road where previous truckers had been. Unless you know the area really well, you could be pretty much screwed.

    170. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by treeves · · Score: 1

      I try not to go into a dessert without a spoon and a cup of good coffee.
      Of course, ten gallons of water is going to be hard for anyone to carry very far if it is in a single container (10 gal is about 80lbs=38kg) and your car breaks down midway through Death Valley and you've got to walk somewhere.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    171. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Come to Australia. If you break down while taking a 4WD across the desert, you might be walking for a month before you see anything more technological than a fencepost - and that's if you know how to live off the land. If not... well, I'm sure we can rent the truck out to the next tourist.

    172. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      My TomTom comes up with the "now you can't sue us, nyah" screen only after a full reset. Powering off and back on doesn't cause it to display again.

      Now if I didn't need to keep doing full resets to work around TomTom's crappy Bluetooth code, I'd be fine...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    173. Re:Please take responsibility for your life. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not getting near / driving 100+ m behind those people is fine (sometimes they are even involved in unexpected gifts - say, in a ~50m fog, when one of them overtakes you and continues at unsafe speed ... but has remarkably visible back fog light, enabling you to follow at matching speed & safe distance; worst case, you would notice soon enough if something bad is happening near your...ram) - especially since often even at 100 m the torch mode of their GPS appears brighter, more noticeable than their back lights... (though that might be also a part of "warning! be careful!" reflex in my visual processing, when seeing a white spot of light ahead, one which can mean an incoming car)

      (and for a second there my internal EN interpreter was erroneously leading me to ask - why posting from a car, especially such relatively long post, especially right next to presumably home? ;p At least your car somewhat matches the nick in a creepy way, so the jokes not only on me ;). But you know, if some piece of electronics probably isn't designed for 24/7/365 operation...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  2. Darwin would be proud. by Kenja · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You call it "Death by GPS" I call it "evolution".

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Darwin would be proud. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      GPS is just a theory. I subscribe to Intelligent Directionism.

    2. Re:Darwin would be proud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intelligent Directionism is just thinly-veiled superstition.

      I prefer to believe in the Winged Linguini Cartographer. All hail his semolina compass rose!

    3. Re:Darwin would be proud. by DoctorFuji · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Stupid people are more likely to die. Enuf said.

    4. Re:Darwin would be proud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call it "Death by GPS" I call it "evolution".

      And the basement dwellers shall inherit the earth! As long as Mom says it's ok.

    5. Re:Darwin would be proud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's funny on a couple of levels.

    6. Re:Darwin would be proud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail. This is Natural Selection - the survival of the fittest. Evolution would be more like developing your own internal biological GPS or, more likely, something like the magnetic sense that homing pigeons have for detecting which way is north. Speaking of which, looking forward to Deus Ex 3...

    7. Re:Darwin would be proud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need Mod points.

    8. Re:Darwin would be proud. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      I can't decide wether to WOOSH you or to PEDANT you.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  3. I call it... by msauve · · Score: 0

    "Death by Darwinism."

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  4. Darwin in effect by lnevo · · Score: 0

    This is just an example of Natural Selection at work.

    1. Re:Darwin in effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best example of Death By GPS comes from Brazil: http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2008-16.html The "Flying Priest"

      He do not even know how to use it and becomes fish food.

    2. Re:Darwin in effect by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Compared to that the usual idiots who'll drive into a river because a ferry was marked as a bridge seem like mere amateurs.

    3. Re:Darwin in effect by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Here's what I don't get: does Brazil not have radar? I mean, he's not likely to produce a huge radar echo or anything, but they should have been able to spot him.

      Or, for that matter, triangulate the satellite phone call.

      Or, heaven forbid, the emergency operator goes to the website of the GPS manufacturer and downloads a copy of the manual, then gives him instructions....

      Which brings me to the question: did they even try to save this guy? Yeah, there may be a Darwin award here, but if this story is true, there was plenty of incompetence to go around, and 99% of it wasn't on the part of the priest.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. It happens by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    My ex-girlfriend got stuck on a road last winter because her GPS took her up a summer only road that was for snowmobiles in the winter. The GPS didn't know the difference. We had to get a buddy's big pickup truck to come crank her our of a snowdrift.

    1. Re:It happens by Literaphile · · Score: 2

      Is she your ex-girlfriend because you realized that someone who doesn't notice snow on the road ahead isn't the sharpest pencil in the drawer?

    2. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ex-girlfriend got stuck on a road last winter because her GPS took her up a summer only road that was for snowmobiles in the winter. The GPS didn't know the difference. We had to get a buddy's big pickup truck to come crank her our of a snowdrift.

      The fact that the road was buried in enough snow to get the vehicle stuck ... that didn't tip her off that something was amiss? Hint for her: if you can't see the road markings because the road is buried in snow, you probably shouldn't take that road.

      I hope your ex is hot because she doesn't sound too bright.

    3. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People shouldn't let GPS be their eyes, maybe their map! I have a buddy who tried to follow GPS to my cabin and it wanted to take him through from the other end of the road we are on. The other end hasn't gone through since before I was born and I am 32....

    4. Re:It happens by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      No, she's his ex because when I rescued her from the snow she realized she didn't want to be with someone who couldn't protect her.

      --
      Loading...
    5. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey, man, if YOU want a girl who NEEDS that much protection all the time, you're welcome to her.

    6. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How far south are you from? One-quarter inch of snow is enough to obliterate road markings. One-quarter inch of snow in no way means you shouldn't take a road.

    7. Re:It happens by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Is she your ex-girlfriend because you realized that someone who doesn't notice snow on the road ahead isn't the sharpest pencil in the drawer?

      Wow, Slashdot nerds really do enjoy a good fantasy about being choosey enough to dump chicks for petty reasons.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint for her: if you can't see the road markings because the road is buried in snow, you probably shouldn't take that road.

      So you don't drive on roads with 5mm of compressed snow on it?

    9. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "being choosey enough to dump chicks for petty reasons."

      Man-hands!

    10. Re:It happens by Americano · · Score: 4, Informative

      You understand that getting stuck in a snowdrift doesn't require a lot of snow to be on the road... right?

      Ground clearance on a lot of vehicles can be measured in inches. Skidding and getting stuck in a drift 6-12 inches deep is easy to do with front wheel drive. I've seen people skid off I-90 in northwestern Pennsylvania in snowy conditions, and get stuck in drifts while driving a hundred yards behind a snow plow / sand truck. I-90 is a major interstate, and the road was about as clear as it's going to get in snowy conditions.

      The real danger would be that, on a seasonal road, it may be very difficult to find any assistance to get yourself hauled *out* of the snowbank.

    11. Re:It happens by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "Not smart enough" isn't a petty reason, it's on the short list of really good reasons.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:It happens by Jaysyn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pretty hard to protect people from their own stupidity.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So she's with your buddy with the big pickup now who no doubt has a large penis from the steroid use? I take it in 5-10 years she'll be bailing on him when the testicular cancer gets him and with the hormone reduction his penis shrinks?

    14. Re:It happens by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Not smart enough" isn't a petty reason, it's on the short list of really good reasons.

      Heh. Oh, come on.. a mistake on the road isn't an IQ test, none of us would pass. Besides, we're Slashdot nerds! Our standards aren't anything like "she must be a problem solver", they're more like "She cannot have a mustache."

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:It happens by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      However, it also means that nobody else has driven down the road since it snowed, and nobody is going to come for you when you go flying off into the ditch because you were speeding in a quarter inch of snow in summer tires.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    16. Re:It happens by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      In 5 - 10 years she'll have lost her curb-appeal anyways, and it will be time to trade her in for a newer model.

      --
      Loading...
    17. Re:It happens by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      How far south are you from? One-quarter inch of snow is enough to obliterate road markings. One-quarter inch of snow in no way means you shouldn't take a road.

      It does around here...

    18. Re:It happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not smart enough" isn't a petty reason, it's on the short list of really good reasons.

      Heh. Oh, come on.. a mistake on the road isn't an IQ test, none of us would pass. Besides, we're Slashdot nerds! Our standards aren't anything like "she must be a problem solver", they're more like "She cannot have a mustache."

      Speak for yourself. Smart and not an idiot on the road are both on my short list and I haven't had any trouble finding women to date.

      The thing about idiotic drivers (who can be smart people) is they don't understand they are the problem. That can cause a lot of tension in a relationship. My ex wife regularly got into accidents and never took one bit of responsibility for causing them. Like the people in these stories blaming the GPS, she's blame the other driver even when she did things like failing to yield.

    19. Re:It happens by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Is she your ex-girlfriend because you realized that someone who doesn't notice snow on the road ahead isn't the sharpest pencil in the drawer?

      I love the arrogance of arm-chair quarterbacks </sarc>

      Newsflash to people living in the south: snow doesn't mean the road is impassable. It means you might need to exercise a little more caution. Where I live, the roads are pretty much covered in snow from October or November through March or April. Are you suggesting that anyone who ventures out on the roads between those months is a moron?

      Newsflash #2: Even smart people sometimes get stuck in the snow, because it can sometimes be difficult or impossible to tell the difference between a perfectly good road with a little snow on it and a treacherous road until it's too late. It happens. It can even happen to YOU. So maybe tone down the condescension a little, because next time, you might be the one who needs a little help.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    20. Re:It happens by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Hint for her: if you can't see the road markings because the road is buried in snow, you probably shouldn't take that road. I hope your ex is hot because she doesn't sound too bright.

      Sigh...neither are you, if you think that being unable to see road markings means you can't drive on that road. I've spent the last 21 years driving on roads like that all winter long. The alternative is to lock myself in my house from November through March. Perhaps that would be fine for you, but I actually like to leave the basement once in a while.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    21. Re:It happens by Literaphile · · Score: 1

      I love the arrogance of arm-chair quarterbacks </sarc>

      Newsflash to people living in the south: snow doesn't mean the road is impassable. It means you might need to exercise a little more caution. Where I live, the roads are pretty much covered in snow from October or November through March or April. Are you suggesting that anyone who ventures out on the roads between those months is a moron?

      Newsflash #2: Even smart people sometimes get stuck in the snow, because it can sometimes be difficult or impossible to tell the difference between a perfectly good road with a little snow on it and a treacherous road until it's too late. It happens. It can even happen to YOU. So maybe tone down the condescension a little, because next time, you might be the one who needs a little help.

      The south? I happen to live in Canada where we do get a fair bit of snow. So yes, I've driven my fair share in the snow.

      And of course I'm not suggesting that you shouldn't drive in the snow. What I am suggesting is that, if it looks like there's a lot of snow ahead (and it's not usually hard to gauge the depth of a snowfall on the road) then you should exercise caution and know the limits of your vehicle.

      Also, Slashdotters apparently need a lesson in dry/sarcastic humour.

    22. Re:It happens by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No, she's his ex because when I rescued her from the snow she realized she didn't want to be with someone who couldn't protect her.

      You're a real internet he-man, I bet you floss your teeth with barbed wire and everything.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:It happens by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      No. I use unwound heat-sink coil. Barbed wire is for pussies.

      --
      Loading...
  6. is map reading really that hard? by alen · · Score: 1

    i couldn't navigate until Platoon Leader's Development Course in the US Army and now i can look at any map and find my way easily. never use a GPS. even learned to navigate using the terrain in a few days.

    half the battle is just looking at your watch and the sun to figure out where north, south, east and west are

    1. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds hard enough that it required special para military training.
      Maybe they need to have a Junior Highschool course GPS training and urban survival 101.
      Maybe they can make a Map Reading for Dummies handbook for us lesser beings.

    2. Re:is map reading really that hard? by causality · · Score: 1

      i couldn't navigate until Platoon Leader's Development Course in the US Army and now i can look at any map and find my way easily. never use a GPS. even learned to navigate using the terrain in a few days.

      half the battle is just looking at your watch and the sun to figure out where north, south, east and west are

      It wasn't difficult to learn how to use a map and compass and then to learn several ways to find general directions without a compass. Until I learned those things, plus some (very basic) survival skills, I felt I had no business hiking and backpacking. I have no idea why anyone would believe that they are somehow exempt from this self-evident truth. Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results, to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it.

      How many stories like this does someone require to understand there is a risk that some preparedness can mitigate? You'd think one example would be enough to make the point. I have to admit, all the posts stating that this is natural selection at work ring true. Some may think that's callous, but it's not. It's just an ugly reality.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:is map reading really that hard? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      half the battle is just looking at your watch and the sun to figure out where north, south, east and west are

      Squints at digital readout on watch. "This wasn't covered in my Boy Scout manual. Where's the damn hour hand?"

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:is map reading really that hard? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Maps aren't any better. I've looked at real maps that have 'roads' marked that really aren't there or are summer only roads.

      Microsoft Street and Trips tried to take me over Ophers Pass in June. When I got home, I looked it up and it "... does not present any technical difficulty for the careful driver, and can be driven in good weather conditions during late summer by high clearance two wheel drive vehicles." Which means not June and not in a 2wd Jetta. If I was looking at a map I wouldn't have known the difference. I got about 1/2 way up it and thought, this isn't right and turned around and too the long way.

    5. Re:is map reading really that hard? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Hey I always like to have a map and one thing I do like about Google Maps on my cell is I can use it as a map.
      While it is really terrible for a small child to die I hope people read the full story.
      Almost 300,000 people a year go to Death Valley. Just how few die by GPS?
      And they didn't die by GPS they died by the same mistakes that have killed people for a long time.
      1. They went to DEATH VALLEY IN THE SUMMER! They call it death valley for a reason.
      2. They didn't bring water.
      3. They didn't have a route and tell people the route.
      4. They didn't have a contact person.
      5. They had bad maps.

      I used to go off road riding on my bike when I was single. I had several long routes that I took, What I did since I was single make a map of all my rides. When I would go off on one I would call my friend and let them know what trail I was on. When I got back I would call them and let them know. I also took about two gallons of water with me and this is in Florida and not death valley.

      Here in the US we still have a lot of really wild land. It is wonderful but it can kill you if you do not respect it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Hydian · · Score: 1

      It isn't that it required special training. It just requires a window of opportunity. Most people simply don't go out and bother to learn how to read a map and compass or the other extremely simple skills involved in land navigation.

    7. Re:is map reading really that hard? by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results

      They are told so, e.g. "there is an app for it".

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    8. Re:is map reading really that hard? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      As a kid back in the 70's, we would go camping for 1 to 3 weeks. load about 40 Lbs. into a pack, park, and then hike for about 3 days, using a compass and the maps we had. Every time I got lost, I had to hike up the mountain ( or very large hill ) get an idea of where I was, use the compass, then safely figure out how to get to the camp site. Farthest we camped from known parking spot was about 26 miles

      got lost for 2 days once, but when I made it back, my dad was rather proud of me ( he said he was giving me 3 days before he would head out to find a ranger ). my brother was more panicked than anything else.

      training ... well let's see, compass usage, how to take a bearing, finding fresh water, how to shoot, how to fish, how to make a fire ( not easy when it's down-pouring ) all the stuff that you need to do basic camping. ( did I mention the proper use of cow bells )

      planning... unless the camping tricks have changed, you try to plan being near water every 4 hours more or less ( most springs are marked on the maps we had ) to refill, and if I recall correctly, it's a gallon of water for every 4 hours of walking in hilly or hot areas. our packs had mostly water and dried evil food ( catching fresh trout, bluegills, bass and pike was tasty meal, cook them in mud cakes )

      tools... besides the above, each of us had an axe, a few knives, some plastic tarp, tons of cord, sleeping bag and some bug repellent.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    9. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      I've taught the same basics to 10 year olds over a weekend - just one of the many things you do in Scouting.

      It amazes me the number of people today that can't even read an analog clock.. let alone have any idea of their bearings in relation to another place.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    10. Re:is map reading really that hard? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      How does that help in the city? Or when driving a moving van on mountain roads? In fact, how does that help when humping a pack in canyon country?

      People with GPS aren't getting lost. They're getting led into situations they can't drive back out of. The issue is two-fold. First, they trust the GPS. But if you don't trust the GPS a map won't help you any better, except that it will never give you any valid shortcuts along with the invalid ones. Second, they don't stop trusting the GPS soon enough. As soon as you think "is this really the right way?" is the time to turn back and take the longer route on the bigger roads. By the time you're saying "yep, I knew this wasn't the right way" you're probably realizing you're out of gas or up to your differential in mud.

    11. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Americano · · Score: 1

      No, map reading isn't that hard. But route planning can be if you don't know the quality of the roads, or the conditions in which you'll be safe to drive on them until you're on that road and aware of the weather conditions. And map reading at 70 mph when you're in too much of a hurry to stop and look is pretty tough.

      PLDC land navigation instruction is good training, but it doesn't put information on the maps that simply isn't available. Most maps simply don't really indicate that "this road washes out in rainy weather" or "this road doesn't get plowed because it's only used during the summer."

      The "death by GPS" issue being talked about here isn't so much identifying an issue with the maps as it is identifying a problem with people's lack of situational awareness: If you see that the road looks lightly travelled and is covered in snow, maybe it's not the road to take if you're in unfamiliar territory; if the road in front of you looks like a dirt road leading you further from civilization in the desert, maybe it's not the road to take without a lot of spare gas, water, and a radio or phone. People are putting blind faith in the directions being given by the GPS unit, rather than using it to augment what they're seeing through the windshield.

    12. Re:is map reading really that hard? by causality · · Score: 1

      Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results They are told so, e.g. "there is an app for it". CC.

      May $DEITY help them if they're dumb enough to automatically believe everything they're told, because no one else is going to.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    13. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Insert favorite officer joke here.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    14. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Squints at digital readout on watch. "This wasn't covered in my Boy Scout manual. Where's the damn hour hand?"

      All you need is the time, having an hour hand is just a shortcut.

      Here's how to do it with a digital watch:
      Finding The North

    15. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is map reading really that hard? i couldn't navigate until Platoon Leader's Development Course in the US Army.

      really?

    16. Re:is map reading really that hard? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results, to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it.

      "...to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it." -- probably true. However, it begs the question: how does one get good at a task at which they are incompetent without performing the task over and over until they get it right?

      I'm not saying that everyone should go download the latest iPhone navigation app and head for Death Valley, but still...you've got to fall off the bike once or twice if you're going to learn to ride.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    17. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      When I was in the Army, despite always lugging around a PLGR (GPS receiver), actually using it was seen as an acknowledgment that you were lost. Which meant that it hardly ever got used except for fixing your position (reports to higher, fire mission, etc).

      Technology is good to have, but you should have the skills not to have to rely on the tech, or know what to do when the tech fails.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    18. Re:is map reading really that hard? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Cool. Never thought of that. And besides, my watch has a compass (and a barometer and a calendar and a bunch of other useless tidbits) built in.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    19. Re:is map reading really that hard? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      half the battle is just looking at your watch and the sun to figure out where north, south, east and west are

      You are aware that they've invented something called a compass?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:is map reading really that hard? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results, to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it.

      Because most people have never had to bet heir lives even on things they are fully competent in.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:is map reading really that hard? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So the solution to finding north when you only have a digital watch is to draw an analogue watch in the sand and use that? Genius.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Graff · · Score: 1

      So the solution to finding north when you only have a digital watch is to draw an analogue watch in the sand and use that? Genius.

      It's much better than NOT finding north and dying out in the wilderness, right?

      I mean, yeah, optimal solution is to have a compass or other direction-finding equipment but in a pinch you have to use the best means possible and if that's drawing an analog watch then go for it.

    23. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Graff · · Score: 1

      As a kid back in the 70's, we would go camping for 1 to 3 weeks. load about 40 Lbs. into a pack, park, and then hike for about 3 days, using a compass and the maps we had.

      This is the solution to a lot of the problems kids have these days. It teaches responsibility, self-reliance, healthy living, a respect for the modern conveniences, and so many other great lessons that are lacking in modern life.

      It's not that we should be luddites and shun modern things but they are conveniences and not completely necessary for living. So many people are lost when the electricity goes out for a couple of hours, or it snows and they don't know how to handle it, or even their market is out of that item of pre-made food they absolutely can't do without. As a society we need to toughen up a bit, learn how to do basic tasks, and stop whining and complaining about missing out on a few luxuries.

      This is especially important in the current economy. The more developed nations are losing out to the less developed ones partially because the less developed ones don't waste as much effort on luxuries and are more willing to get dirty and get stuff done. For example, when you don't have money for the best cuts of meat and specialty products you need to be able to butcher your own and cook stuff from scratch. The same thing goes for jobs, people need to be willing to take a lower-paying job rather than be unemployed or maybe they should even start their own businesses, it doesn't take much to start a home business and there are TONS of opportunities out there.

      Going camping is not the only way to teach these sorts of coping skills but it is certainly an excellent way of doing so. And hey, it's even fun! It's a great way to have bonding moments with your family and learn skills that will carry you forward through both good times and tough times.

    24. Re:is map reading really that hard? by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      ( did I mention the proper use of cow bells )

      No, but I assume it involved needing more cow bell.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    25. Re:is map reading really that hard? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      half the battle is just looking at your watch and the sun to figure out where north, south, east and west are

      Heh, good luck with that in England... Sun?

      It does remind me of one time I had to go via back roads (main road was closed), with no sat nav. When I was asked how I navigated back, I just told my boss I'd followed the rainbow (which was conveniently present for about an hour). I knew I wanted to go NE, and I knew the sun was W/SW. It's not rocket science...

    26. Re:is map reading really that hard? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      I have to always mention 'cow bells' when it involves myself camping.

      When I was taught to hike in any bear country, the rule was 'hang a cow bell' off your pack

      the thinking is ( and I still think this is valid east of the Mississippi ), the more noise you make, the easier for the bears to move far away from you, or to hear a bear snap a twig wondering what is that noise.

      to this day, I have yet to encounter a bear when I had a bell on, but when i did not, they are everywhere.

      When without a bell, in bear country, bearmace is the only safe option. ( also can stop a bike thief quickly )

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    27. Re:is map reading really that hard? by causality · · Score: 1

      Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results, to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it.

      "...to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it." -- probably true. However, it begs the question: how does one get good at a task at which they are incompetent without performing the task over and over until they get it right? I'm not saying that everyone should go download the latest iPhone navigation app and head for Death Valley, but still...you've got to fall off the bike once or twice if you're going to learn to ride.

      I mean no offense, but that's such a basic question that I can't help but wonder if you're trolling.

      You've never learned anything in your life where failure can have a severe penalty? You do drive, don't you?

      Basic navigation with a map and compass is an incredibly easy skill to learn. If you are a decent learner with an average memory you could do it in an afternoon. Just like you didn't start learning how to drive by suddenly being placed on a high-speed eight-lane highway during rush-hour traffic, you don't start learning how to use a map and compass by having a helicopter drop you off in a remote jungle somewhere with the pilot saying "good luck, hope you make it." You can learn basic navigation in the suburbs for that matter -- they have landmarks too. If you want to learn it in the forest, you could do something obvious like travel with someone who already has the skill and is able to supervise you. Really this doesn't require a lot of imagination.

      The concepts are the same whether it's tundra or suburbia. This notion of pretending like those who are competent at basic skills have some kind of unfair advantage over the rest of us, or special dispensation, or have done anything the rest of us couldn't also do ... it's pathological and seriously needs to be eliminated. It's the very best way to sell yourself short that I can name. It appears to be contagious, too.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    28. Re:is map reading really that hard? by causality · · Score: 1

      Nor do I understand why anyone believes they can perform a task at which they are incompetent and expect good results, to the point where they are willing to bet their life on it.

      Because most people have never had to bet heir lives even on things they are fully competent in.

      If they can't understand that it's a lethal risk to go to a place like Death Valley without adequate supplies, without survival skills, without contingency plans, without making sure someone knows that you're there and knows your intended route and by when you should return ... then I'm sorry but we do in fact call that natural selection. The only mystery about it is how we managed to produce a nation full of so many people who can't understand something so simple and basic and easy to comprehend.

      And yes, if you drive an automobile then you bet your life (and those around you) daily on things in which you have at least some competence. The point is to understand this as a general concept.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    29. Re:is map reading really that hard? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      This notion of pretending like those who are competent at basic skills have some kind of unfair advantage over the rest of us, or special dispensation, or have done anything the rest of us couldn't also do ... it's pathological and seriously needs to be eliminated. It's the very best way to sell yourself short that I can name. It appears to be contagious, too.

      If that is what it sounded like I was saying, either I didn't express my point clearly or for some reason, you completely misunderstood what I was trying to say. I certainly wasn't saying that some people are just "born with it" and the rest of us are just S.O.L. -- quite the opposite, in fact. My point was that to learn something, you just have to go do it, and sometimes learning involves an element of risk. The first time I went sea kayaking, I rented a boat, threw it in the ocean, and started paddling. I had been a lake canoer for years and I went with a more-or-less experienced friend on a relatively sheltered bay (so it wasn't entirely unreasonable) but without knowing anything about ocean kayaking, I was taking a risk that I wouldn't get myself in over my head (literally) while learning what I needed to learn to become a competent kayaker.

      Unfortunately, "common sense" isn't really common. That's not a snarky judgment about the overall stupidity of people -- it's an observation that what we call "common sense" really is an awareness of the dangers of particular situations, and it's acquired knowledge. There's a saying in aviation:

      New Pilot: How do you get good judgment?
      Old Pilot: Experience.
      New Pilot: How do you get experience?
      Old Pilot: Bad judgment.

      The trick is to get experience without getting yourself killed in the process.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  7. Wrong name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not called 'death by GPS' its called 'natural selection'.

  8. Darwin at work. by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry if I sound unsympathetic... but really, who starts to drive through a large unpopulated expanse of land without at least making sure they have enough gas to make it across? I've seen "Last Chance" gas stations before, and in my experience they are totally serious... dare I even say deadly serious. If you don't fill up there, you can very well not expect to ever see another human being again for as long as you live... which might not be very long from now if you decide that you have enough gas just because your low gas indicator isn't lit.

    1. Re:Darwin at work. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I sound unsympathetic... but really, who starts to drive through a large unpopulated expanse of land without at least making sure they have enough gas to make it across?

      Sorry if I sound unsympathetic, but really, who posts a Slashdot comment without reading the article...oh, never mind.

      The article doesn't mention anyone running out of fuel. It talks about people who followed (or possibly mis-followed) directions from the GPS units and drove onto private, closed, rough, or unmaintained roads deep in the desert wilderness and then got stuck. If you want to lecture these people about anything, it should be over their failure to carry enough water before entering the desert. Even if you're going the right way your vehicle can still break down and strand you far from civilization; all the gasoline in the world won't help you when you're dying from dehydration.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:Darwin at work. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      "If you don't fill up there, you can very well not expect to ever see another human being again for as long as you live."
      IMO If forgetting to fill up on fuel results in your death then you probably weren't adequately prepared for the trip in the first place. If you are going into an area where you can't walk far enough to get help without needing water then you need to make provisions for how you will survive and either escape or get help if your car breaks down.

      Part of the problem is people place blind trust in their GPS units. Just because the GPS unit has found a route doesn't mean it's a route you can drive without taking extra precautions but also IMO there need to be warnings on the ground of routes that should not be driven without special precautions.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Darwin at work. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      I'd say the biggest mistake was not gas nor water, but in not stopping at a truck stop and talking to an experienced trucker beforehand. I've found the safest bet from getting to point B from point A without ending up in the middle of the damned sticks is to just talk to a long haul trucker that has been running them roads since before you were born.

      They ain't gonna run down no shitty "bob's road" if there are any other roads available because it will beat the hell out of the rig, they know where the food and lodging is at, and in five minutes or less of walking into any truckstop you'll find an old hand that'll be happy to point out the easiest hassle free route on your map (and I've found especially with Google maps or Mapquest they'll be at least one "What the hell are they sending you down THAT road?" exclamation) and get you off to an easy run.

      So even though I have access to the tech I've found the simplest ways are still the best, just a plain map and an experienced trucker with a marker. I've had to drive into some truly shitty backwoods middle of nowhere places and with the trucker method I've never been steered wrong, and even knew where the best food was at along the way!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Darwin at work. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Sure. Sounds great. But how many people even need to make the Kessel run in 12 parsecs?

    5. Re:Darwin at work. by SimplyGeek · · Score: 1

      The FBI did a study a few years ago about serial killers. Turns out the majority of them were truckers. The constant travel made it safer for them to commit their crimes. All kidding aside, you nailed it. I try to talk to locals before heading into a less populated area. Failing that, talking to people that have made the trek themselves has made me re-write even the most researched travel plans. As someone who loves to drive and motorcycle through unpopulated parts of America, this has helped me a lot.

    6. Re:Darwin at work. by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

      It works the other way, too. Last summer my family and I were driving across Wyoming. And not on some dinky little back road, either but on I-90. We drove past a gas station and I glanced at my gas gauge. A little under 1/4 tank left, probably a good 60 or 70 miles. I kept on going, planning to stop in 45 miles or so.

      About 20 miles later I told the GPS to find me a gas station along my current route. There isn't one, it said. Not for another 80 miles. I told it to look for the nearest station in any direction. It found two -- the one 80 miles in front of me, and the one 20 miles behind me. Nothing else in any direction. Having only about another 40 miles worth of fuel, I turned around. (About that time my wife commented, "Well, at least the low fuel indicator isn't on yet." Not 5 seconds later... Bing! Bing!)

      Anyway, without the GPS I would surely have kept going forward. I'm from the midwest, and it's utterly inconceivable (and yes, that word means exactly what I think it means) that there wouldn't be any gas stations along the freakin' interstate for 100 miles! Just plain not possible. We would have been stranded. We would also have been stranded if the GPS had incorrectly told us that there was a station 20 miles in front of us.

      So I can understand how someone from a different region could get faked out by wrong assumptions. But still, that Death Valley thing is simple stupidity.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    7. Re:Darwin at work. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did read the article... which mentions a woman lying down next to her Jeep. Really, if she had gas, wouldn't she be trying to drive to where she's thinking she's going instead of just wandering around on foot?

    8. Re:Darwin at work. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      ... it's utterly inconceivable (and yes, that word means exactly what I think it means) that there wouldn't be any gas stations along the freakin' interstate for 100 miles! Just plain not possible.

      I don't think that's impossible at all. It's just a matter of how close the highway runs to populated places, and how often. Was there any signage on the highway to indicate how far it was to the next town? If it said 25 miles away, but the GPS says the nearest gas station is 80 miles further along, then either the town is so small it doesn't have a gas station, or else the GPS is just plain wrong. The thing is, if a town is big enough to warrant a sign on the road that is more than 25 miles away, then it's probably big enough to have a gas station too. Either way, before making any long road trips, it's always best to have a plan before you even set out, using a good old fashioned map to figure out which towns or cities you are going to stop for gas in along the way.

    9. Re:Darwin at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever driven through Death Valley? Gas isn't the only factor in your car surviving the trip. It's mountainous on both edges and vacationers with a full vehicle often find themselves overheating trying to drive out of that hellhole.

      I agree, be responsible with knowing where you're going, but I gotta give Death Valley a break.

    10. Re:Darwin at work. by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I'm reasonably familiar with that stretch of I-90. It sounds like you missed the "Next services: 95 miles" sign. When you're driving out west, it's not uncommon for the next gas station to be 50 miles away or more, so keep an eye out for those signs -- they're not kidding.

      (And if you're driving off the main roads, don't count on those signs being there. Instead, make sure you've got at least a half-tank of gas at all times.)

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    11. Re:Darwin at work. by Cosgrach · · Score: 0

      Indeed.

      My motto is and always will be - Don't fly, drive or sail over any region that you are not prepared to camp in. Generally, that leaves sailing out of my list of activities.

      Whenever I drive somewhere out of an urban area, I always have extra fuel, water, food, first aid kit and some form of shelter (blanket, tarp, etc...). For me, 'out of the urban area' is about 10 - 20 miles beyond any services.

      In flying, the same rules apply - water, food, first aid kit and blankets at a minimum. And I always, always make sure that I plan my fuel accordingly. The fuel on the ground behind you does not help you in any way. The number one cause of death in aviation mishaps is pilot error.

      I am a Darwinist! If someone is stupid enough to put themselves is a position to get killed and they end up dead, that's okay by me.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    12. Re:Darwin at work. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Once I was driving from Vegas up to Denver through Southern Utah. I saw a sign that said "last gas for 100 miles". I figured they were exaggerating a bit, plus my car was telling me that it had enough gas left for 120 miles, so I blew past it. I started to get really nervous when my low fuel warning came on before I saw the next gas station...

    13. Re:Darwin at work. by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The thing is, if a town is big enough to warrant a sign on the road that is more than 25 miles away, then it's probably big enough to have a gas station too.

      That's a bad assumption. Distance signs on the interstate highways give three distances: the distance to the next exit (not always an inhabited location), the distance to the inhabited location after that, and the distance to the next major city. For example (numbers are approximate):

      Racetrack: 7
      Warm Springs: 13
      Butte: 75

      Racetrack is two buildings beside the road, Warm Springs isn't much bigger; Butte is a small city. You won't see "Anaconda: 17" until you pass Racetrack, but Anaconda is a town big enough to support an airport, a hospital, and several gas stations.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    14. Re:Darwin at work. by toppings · · Score: 1

      If you want to lecture these people about anything, it should be over their failure to carry enough water before entering the desert.

      It would be an even bigger mistake if they did not bring enough air. Seriously-- you can't even breathe without that stuff and junk.

    15. Re:Darwin at work. by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Running out of gas is a common issue with these cases. They are not exclusive to Death Valley, they are rather common in Utah as well, when the GPS tells them to take this dirt road that turns into a goat trail. The road does sometimes go all the way through and could be passable, but not without a full tank of gas and possibly even extra fuel cans. So gas/fuel is a legitimate issue. Yes water would help, but if you run out of gas 80 miles from pavement, nobody local knows your passing through, and you aren't used to traveling in the desert, water ain't going to help much. Being able to keep pushing on or being able to turn around and drive back out are often more critical.

      I'm not trying to downplay the importance of water, but if you never have to get out of the vehicle you don't need the water. Personally I think the GPS companies need to rework their algorithms to not try and follow any road possible, but (especially for long distance trips) to stick to main state and US highways. Especially for GPS's in rental vehicles.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    16. Re:Darwin at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will agree that truckers know a hell of a lot about the road system, but in the cases in this article they would know no more than anyone else. They don't do long haul truck routes through Death Valley along old dirt roads. These people were in a park in the wilderness not going between major cities.

      People not relying on GPS would help, but there is nothing better than being properly prepared for trouble. Desert = bring LOTS of water. And it might seem wrong, but you want loose fitting clothes that cover as much skin as possible. This keeps your skin from burning and all that clothing can help evaporate perspiration and keep your body temp normal.

    17. Re:Darwin at work. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      > seen "Last Chance" gas stations before

      In Doolin, Ireland there's a sign that says 'Last pub for 2000 miles'.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    18. Re:Darwin at work. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hanging around truck stops chatting to truckers might get you in other sorts of trouble though.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Darwin at work. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      IMO If forgetting to fill up on fuel results in your death then you probably weren't adequately prepared for the trip in the first place.

      Well said, cars do stop running down for other reasons than running out of fuel, especially in extreme cold or hot climates. You can never rule out a puncture or two, stone through the radiator, unexpected pothole breaking your suspension, some random gasket blowing, whatever.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Darwin at work. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      GP said that he thought it was inconceivable, not impossible. You have inadvertently made exactly the same mistake as Vizzini in the Princess Bride.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:Darwin at work. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Thank your lucky stars you don't ride a motorcycle, mine's got a range of about 120 miles before the reserve light comes on...you can push it to 145/150 before you actually run out (no, I've never tested it) but I wouldn't fancy it in the middle of a desert.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:Darwin at work. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, he said both.

    23. Re:Darwin at work. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I actually have a motorcycle as well. I don't have a fancy one with a reserve light though, I just have to wait until it putters to a stop, flick the fuel switch to reserve, and find a fuel station as fast as I can.

  9. A map is a map by kenholm3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whether that map is electronic (GPS) or not (origami), maps can be out-of-date or just plain wrong. Nattrass said. "A map in that case may have been a lifesaver for them." Not so. If they had a GOOD/ACCURATE map, it could have been a lifesaver. Had they a map from 100 years ago, it would have been useless.

    --
    God is good all the time! -K
    1. Re:A map is a map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether that map is electronic (GPS) or not (origami), maps can be out-of-date or just plain wrong.

      Nattrass said. "A map in that case may have been a lifesaver for them." Not so. If they had a GOOD/ACCURATE map, it could have been a lifesaver. Had they a map from 100 years ago, it would have been useless.

      Well, mountains and rivers don't change much in 100 years. But you are correct that the thing to blame is not GPS itself, it is the map that is provided along with it. Having your true coordinates and correct maps would get you out of trouble. Trusting your life to outdated or wrong maps on a cheap GPS device is not a good idea.

    2. Re:A map is a map by Octorian · · Score: 2

      This is why I hate conventional car GPS units. They go to great lengths to hide the map from you, and often make it difficult to use when you get to it. They keep you as ignorant as possible until 300ft prior to making a turn. This is why, despite its other limitations, I'm far more comfortable with Google Maps on my GPS-enabled phone. It actually shows me a route on an easily viewable map, so I get a feel for how I'm actually going to get there before I start driving.

    3. Re:A map is a map by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You've never used a GPS unit with a zoom/scan option? I've never seen such a device before, but I guess it could exist. Of course most people aren't going to zoom out every time they get a route and verify that it makes sense, but if you notice you're going to down a dirt road and you're still hours from your destination, most people would stop and check.

      Of course some people won't, and they'll die, and the world will get a tiny bit smarter overall.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:A map is a map by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      I think the point was more that if these people had had a map and known how to use it then it could have been a lifesaver. The big problem with the GPS units in these circumstances is users who don't know how to find alternate routes when their original planned path is impassible (or at least, ought to be recognized as such). Someone may know how to enter an origin and destination and follow the given directions, but may not know how to select an alternate route (using the software, or just by looking at the rest of the map on the device).

      On the other hand, someone using a paper map almost certainly does have those basic navigation skills; you can't use a paper map at all without them.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:A map is a map by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an in-car GPS system where you couldn't hit some sort of menu button and then select "view map" that, while not at smooth and feature-rich as GMaps, worked perfectly well for viewing the path of travel and surrounding area. I love GMaps and use it all the time (generally reviewing and committing the directions to memory), but tell me what happens when you've got no cell signal and the GPS signal flips out thus causing a recalculation. Personally, I use Google when I have it, but have GPS maps loaded to my phone's SD card as a backup.

    6. Re:A map is a map by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

      my garmin has a very annoying misfeature. i run with it fairly zoomed out, i like to see a bigger picture.
      i'm driving a tractor trailer and many times i need to QUICKLY determine alternatives for a vehicle than cannot
      be quickly maneuvered.

      so this misfeature of garmin's is to automatically zoom IN as you near a turn. WORST POSSIBLE TIME,
      it's at turns i need to know the bigger picture. whether the turn is physically unattractive for the truck,
      or simply posted with a "no trucks" sign. eg: turn right instead of left at the same intersection and "go around
      about way" or go forward a block or two and come in from the the other direction, etc.
      but in this age of non euclidean street planners, one does NOT assume you are going to be able to find
      a 'next turn'. suburban streets built in the last 20 years rarely (it seems) have rational shapes or interconnects.
      i need to see a map. definitely don't need to see things zoomed in to the lines in the pedestrian crossing.

      and this misfeature will fight you if you try to zoom back out while moving.

      no way to turn off that auto zoom-in misfeature. grrrrr.

    7. Re:A map is a map by khr · · Score: 2

      But also, a paper map isn't going to talk to you in an authoritative voice that sounds like it knows where you're going. While the GPS isn't going to stop and say "hmm... Looks like a bad road, we'd better go back and try another".

      At least with a paper map, we're more likely to look at more than just the destination and make some sort of plan.

    8. Re:A map is a map by eltonito · · Score: 1

      Not only could it exist, but it does and has since at least 2006 on all but the absolute cheapest GPS units. Both my low end Garmin and my cheap crappy Mio allowed me to pan and zoom on the map. They've also had several view options of routes, including fly-overs and speed-sensitive scaling, which displays the entire route as once and zooms in as you drive faster. Maps on GPS's are generally easy to use and certainly aren't "hidden."

    9. Re:A map is a map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "my garmin has a very annoying misfeature. i run with it fairly zoomed out, i like to see a bigger picture.
      i'm driving a tractor trailer.."

      Get a real one for professional truckers, it does all that for you, you cheap bastard.

    10. Re:A map is a map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What conventional GPS units don't have a zoom feature.

      Ohh, I get it, you hate them because you didn't know they had one. Gotya.

    11. Re:A map is a map by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Had they a map from 100 years ago, it would have been useless.

      Depends on the locale. In a lot of places, the roads are on thousand-year-old goat tracks.

    12. Re:A map is a map by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, the thing here is that a paper map won't map the route automatically for you, and likely won't include information that would cause you to believe the shortcut through the pig wallow is there.

      If you can't see it on the map, you can't make the mistake of planning your route through it.

      But a GPS map database prides itself on knowing every wagon-rut. And route software prides itself on delivering the minimal-time or -distance route.

      Try out the "walking" option in Google Maps some time. But if you're going to use it, bring crampons and a kayak, and learn to hide from irate gun-toting landowners.

    13. Re:A map is a map by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I use Garmin Mobile XT on my phone, in addition to Google Maps. Google Maps does not have voice instructions (and when I'm driving, I like to look at the road, not my phone) nor it rotates the map so "up" is whatever direction I am going (instead of north), though maybe it is different in a new version, I have to go and check :). Garmin, on the other hand, is a bit slow in map mode (when I want to find something), so I use it when I'm driving (since the voice instructions and the 3D view work fine), but I use Google Maps when I want to find some place on the map. When I actually want to go there, I start Garmin.

      Most of the time I can drive by the voice instructions alone, but sometimes I have to look at the screen to see which way the device wants me to go.

    14. Re:A map is a map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't any of the convential units manufactured in the last five years or so that won't show you the turn by turn directions as text ahead of time, so if you care to look you can know if its ultimate plan is to take you down I-81 or East Otter Kill Rd, before you leave the drive way. They also will almost allways let you zoom the map out so you can see if there are "better" roads near by and how to get yourself there.

      That said you are correct in that they don't encorage you to do any of these things because if you don't press the tiny buttons at the edges they don't tell you anything but what they guess you need to know and they don't tell you that long before their best guess at when you need to know it. The information is there if you choose to look however.

    15. Re:A map is a map by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Try out the "walking" option in Google Maps some time. But if you're going to use it, bring crampons and a kayak

      There's such a thing as taking "be prepared" too far.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:A map is a map by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Try out the "walking" option in Google Maps some time. But if you're going to use it, bring crampons and a kayak

      There's such a thing as taking "be prepared" too far.

      That's why I left out the hang-glider.

  10. Seen this by DCFusor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Or close enough. Not long ago I had a trucker come to my door, out of breath, having stuck his tractor at the bottom of the hill I live near the top of, being brought this way by MapQuest and GPS. Nothing special you say...well, evidently those services thought a 1 lane gravel road going straight up a mountain (in SW VA), complete with cliffs, deep ditches, and short radius turns was a perfectly fine route to send this dupe on. Believe me, there are plenty of small cars that don't make it on that road, and it took "the million dollar wrecker" many hours to extract this guy, probably cost him his job on top of it.
    .

    Now, the real question was actually even how he got as far as he did. He'd had to go up and down and around for a couple miles of almost-that-bad road to get where he got stuck in a place utterly obvious a tractor couldn't go -- it was longer and straighter than the distance between two hairpins near the bottom of that hill, and driving skill at that point made no difference. I'd have to suppose this guy didn't realize that it was pointless, and that even an hour of carefully backing up the way he came would be a better plan -- there is no place to turn one of these.
    .

    What is truly hilarious is that he would only have saved two miles (out of 10-15) doing this over simply using the main, paved roads -- this was a "shortcut", and the way no one goes who knows the roads here -- too hard on the vehicle to be worth saving the miles, and you save no gas at all.
    .

    So yeah, it took both driver ignorance AND a lousy GPS to get there, but it seems both were willin'.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    1. Re:Seen this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      evidently those services thought a 1 lane gravel road going straight up a mountain (in SW VA), complete with cliffs, deep ditches, and short radius turns was a perfectly fine route to send this dupe on. Believe me, there are plenty of small cars that don't make it on that road, and it took "the million dollar wrecker" many hours to extract this guy, probably cost him his job on top of it.

      Wrong, those services have _No Idea_ what manner of vehicle he was intending to drive or what the current conditions of those roads may be (generally the map only indicates their existence not their size, nearby terrain and level of maintenance), and thus can't be trusted to make accurate determinations if his vehicle could navigate those roads.

      GPS and computer generate map routs, are a tool. Just like a hammer. It's no more the GPS's fault that the trucker tried to drive an unnavigable road than it's the hammer's fault if you hit your thumb with it.

    2. Re:Seen this by guruevi · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know there are specific Truck/Professional GPS units available? Off course they don't cost $50 but closer to $500 for the same 7" but the maps are specifically laid out for big rigs, hazmat and other restrictions to the roads that might come along on a cross-country drive. It seems to me that trucker probably wouldn't have been helped with a map either because he would've seen a shorter route on the map regardless.

      The whole country (at least the US) is mapped and all restrictions on the roads (height, width, weight, curvature) are known by the government and private mapping companies. Those databases literally take up Terabytes and have to get condensed into usable information on a 4Gig data card, not something you can put in the simplest GPS units just yet.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Seen this by pspahn · · Score: 1

      but it seems both were willin'.

      Truckers don't love that song for just any reason. It's a lifestyle.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    4. Re:Seen this by spauldo · · Score: 1

      The reason all these truckers wind up with crappy GPS units is because they invariably buy them with their first paycheck and can't afford the $400 trucker GPS. Most truckers are fairly cash-strapped when they first start out, having just changed careers and paid for trucking school.

      I didn't; I figured I didn't really need one, and now if I need a quick overview of the road, I just use Google Maps on my phone to show me the immediate area. I know how to read a map, though, and a lot of truckers really don't. Hell, my girlfriend (also a driver) can't seem to wrap her head around the cardinal directions and has no sense of geography at all.

      My girlfriend has an old out-of-date Magellan GPS in her truck, and I'm just waiting for the call where she wound up halfway up some tiny mountain road with a washed out bridge.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    5. Re:Seen this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why the GPS would cost more than a Garmin that can recognize specific settings for roads (ie: any vaguely newish unit). The map data is the vital part, that's about it.

      captcha: terrain

    6. Re:Seen this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I work for a software company devoted solely to the trucking industry. I find it hard to believe that any serious driver or carrier would be doing this. The real pros have their routes pre-planned, most often with a contract stating exactly which way they should go that factors in which distance database provider is being used, shortest vs quickest vs practical and hazmat. All kinds of software alarms go off when the driver veers out of route. The tolerance is exceptionally thin here too. Now, they're not always looking at a pre-printed route that tells them exactly which turns to make anymore, but I strongly suspect that they're not driving by GPS either. Most get their routes sent to their mobile communications equipment in the truck. It is very sophisticated and indeed, those large distance/map databases are in the back office along with our software.

    7. Re:Seen this by b0bby · · Score: 1

      You know there are specific Truck/Professional GPS units available? Off course they don't cost $50 but closer to $500 for the same 7" but the maps are specifically laid out for big rigs, hazmat and other restrictions to the roads that might come along on a cross-country drive.

      There are also trucker add-ons for MS Streets & Trips you can buy, that you can run on a laptop. I bought a one-year out of date version for $20 to get the GPS dongle for maritime software, but it's handy having a netbook be a GPS if you want it.

    8. Re:Seen this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like maps. GPS is useful, but nowhere near 100% accurate. If you aren't familiar with the route, it's your responsibility to familiarize yourself before you embark.
       
      Professional truckers know better. Not the GPS's fault.

    9. Re:Seen this by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Not really as hilarious as that, but I live about three blocks from a highway on-ramp. For some reason, the GPS unit, about half of the time, will route me 5 blocks down, over a bridge, and 5 blocks back, just to avoid going on one of those initial 3 blocks. For the life of me, I can't figure out what it thinks it's doing. But I've definitely learned not to trust it.

      Also, *never* choose "shortest" route. That way lies madness, and driving across people's lawns.

    10. Re:Seen this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My family runs a medium sized trucking company, and I can assure you that we use such specialized maps for all our route planning.

      I can't even fathom how someone could wind up in such a situation. Must have been an owner-operator who thought he was too clever to get proper directions from dispatch; They're most frequently the ones who try crap like this.

  11. I've been seeing this for decades now... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was in the US Coast Guard from roughly 1990 to 2000, and GPS quickly became a very popular alternative to the older LORAN-C system used by recreational & commercial boaters alike. I did a number of patrols in Boston Harbor, which has a few very shallow spots in it. There are a couple places in particular where there are rocks just below the surface of the water at low tide, but if you have even the most basic level of understanding aids to navigation (bouys, etc) it's very easy to avoid those spots. There's one spot south of Logan Airport called "lower middle" that has rocks just below the waterline, but well marked channels guide boaters well around both sides of it.

    I still clearly recall one summer day when we were on patrol and saw a small boat moving slowly through lower middle, pretty much directly toward where we knew the rocks were. We sped towards them as quickly as we could and tried to get their attention, but before we could we saw the unmistakable result of their boat hitting the rocks at a slow speed - the boat lurched a bit and the back kicked up noticeably. By the time we got close enough to them without putting our own boat in danger we could see oil starting to leak out around their engine.

    When we told the operator that he was well outside the marked channels and that he had struck a rock that's clearly marked on all navigation charts, he simply replied, "Well my GPS told me to turn left here."

    1. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by ojak · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, does GPS help find their dead body?

    2. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by radtea · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When we told the operator that he was well outside the marked channels and that he had struck a rock that's clearly marked on all navigation charts, he simply replied, "Well my GPS told me to turn left here."

      I grew up living on a rocky point with reefs offshore in an area with 16 foot tides, and every couple of years my father and brother and I would rescue boaters who'd run aground. This was back when LORAN was still pretty new and GPS undreamed of, but the universal feature of people who hit the rocks was that the only navigation aid on board was--at best--a road map.

      A big part of the problem is that people are simply ignorant. If you didn't grow up in an area or haven't lived there for a long time it can be hard to appreciate the risks. And most people grow up in urban or suburban areas that effectively have no (natural) risks at all. People like that simply don't know enough to appreciate that the landscape and climate can kill them if they don't take the appropriate precautions. GPS is just an enabling device that helps that ignorance get them killed: it creates an illusion of safety and certainty that they might otherwise not have, although according to the article people were plenty able to get into trouble without it.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by starfishsystems · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any competent navigator knows to treat GPS as a tool for verifying where you are. Period.

      Unless all other means of verification (visual, compass, sextant, RDF, depth sounder, radar, LORAN, dead reckoning) are unavailable, you should never rely on GPS alone.

      Boaters should be particularly suspicious of GPS devices which instruct them to "take next exit right after overpass".

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    4. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wander if the same thing happened for larger ships too. For example,

            http://uk.reuters.com/article/2010/04/14/us-australia-ship-arrests-idUKTRE63D17N20100414
            http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/28/submarine-aground-hms-astute-commander

      They see a quicker path via GPS and ...

    5. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by Superdarion · · Score: 1

      Only if you're broadcasting your position to a server, which is not something GPS devices do automatically.

    6. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any competent navigator knows to treat GPS as a tool for verifying where you are. Period.

      Unfortunately, boating laws don't require the presence of any boating experience, let alone a competent navigator. Any competent car salesman knows that GPS is an effective substitute for AAA-based navigation

    7. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      a p value of less than 10^-11 would be a 0.000000001% chance. Or less.

    8. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by david.given · · Score: 2

      Any competent navigator knows to treat GPS as a tool for verifying where you are.

      Once when sailing with my father in his 7m yacht last year, in Lochcarron, Scotland, I wanted to find our position and without thinking about it grabbed the hand-bearing compass and took a couple of bearings before plotting our location on the chart --- totally forgetting that we had a GPS. The whole process took about 20 seconds. Habit, I suppose (and a good one to get into).

      Incidentally, I can recommend to anyone with an interest in maps to learn how to find their position using a hand-bearing compass. It's very easy, dead handy, and gives you a new appreciation for landmarks and sightlines. You'll never see a landscape the same way again.

    9. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by afidel · · Score: 2

      Yep, my dad and I probably saved a guy and his two sons. They were climbing on Mt Whitney in tshirts and sandals and only one flashlight between them. He was there well after dark trying to climb down. We asked him why they didn't have proper equipment and he said he had no idea it would be like that! We had about 5k worth of equipment with us because while it might be overkill it would probably keep us alive through anything we were going to experience there during the summer months. Btw even when I do use GPS I also have USGS maps coated with a waterproof sealant and a compass just in case my batteries or the whole unit dies.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2

      Any competent navigator knows to treat GPS as a tool for verifying where you are. Period.

      Except technology can easily fail, and even fail silently, so you need to know how to tell when something like your GPS isn't working properly and how to use something low tech like a compass since its batteries will never die.

      Another quick anecdote on how technology can easily (and silently) fail - back around the time I was in Boston I heard a story on the news about a cruise ship that was sailing up the coast from Florida. Somewhere off the coast of Cape Cod it ran aground on a sandbar. The problem in that case was that their GPS wasn't working properly and was only feeding dead reckoning data to the cruise ships auto pilot. They drifted a mile or two off course by the time they got up to the Cape Cod area. The culprit in that case was a faulty antenna connection that caused the GPS to stop receiving. And yet nobody on the bridge of the cruise ship noticed the warning being displayed by the GPS...

    11. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      And the coast guard has been saying this for a year too: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=loranMain

      The Coast Guard strongly urges mariners currently using LORAN-C for navigation to shift to a GPS navigation system and become familiar with its operation as soon as possible. Mariners will not be able to rely upon LORAN-C for navigation as of Feb. 8, 2010.

    12. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      GPS is just an enabling device that helps that ignorance get them killed

      Would it be too much to ask that every vehicle - boat, airplane, or automobile - be equiped with GPS, then? While we're at it, let's put it in $150+ Kelty backpacks, as a "feature".

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An IFR certified GPS is legal as a source of primary navigation in aviation operations. That said, smart pilots "trust but verify", using older technologies such as VOR/DME, TACAN, etc as an independent source of position data. LPV approach to minimums is a beautiful thing, but scary at the same time.

    14. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by radtea · · Score: 1

      The p-value in this case is the probability of the null hypothesis, which is, "There are no innocent people being held at Guantanamo Bay." This is the perfectly ordinary language of statistics, which I strongly encourage you to learn. Having a basic grasp of probability theory will change your view of the world.

      The computation is based on simple Poison statistics. Essentially, what is P(0) for a mean of N, where N is the average number of innocent people you'd expect in a population the size of the prison camp based on well-known error rates in law enforcement activities and given the complete lack of meaningful judicial oversight.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    15. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I was certain the P value was the direct probability. This coming from someone who got a grand total of 4 questions wrong on all tests taking in statistics and got every single question on the final right. Maybe it's been too long.

      Ah that's strange, Wikipedia effectively claims the P value and the alpha value are the same:

      Traditionally, one rejects the null hypothesis if the p-value is smaller than or equal to the significance level,[2] often represented by the Greek letter (alpha).

      (Well, okay, the alpha value is effectively meaningless and stands for "this is the number I want to see before I'll believe it." It has nothing to do with the actual data.)

      Statistics is complex.

  12. Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Lucas123 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He'd hold two sticks up to the sun, determine his location and time to destination ... then eat a few grubs and squeeze a shot of water from some animal dung.

    1. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Av8rjoker · · Score: 2

      Or spend the night in a hotel while awesome editing makes everything look extreme!

    2. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 5, Informative

      ... and then he'd pack it in for the day, take the camera crew out for a nice dinner at the nearest steakhouse, check into his hotel and be all fresh for the next day's shoot.

      Bear is at best entertainment (think 'fear factor' outdoors), at worst a fraud. A real "survivorman" is Les Stroud, who packs in all his own gear and films everything himself, alone... and actually stays out in the wilderness for the duration.

    3. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by CatsupBoy · · Score: 1

      Right, because putting your life in the hands of a TV sensation is much better. Try dying of Giardiasis after pulling this stunt in the wilderness.

    4. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by sanosuke001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always felt Bear Grylls was a hack; Les Stroud I enjoy watching because he actually walks you through what he is doing to survive. If Bear gets screwed somehow, he's got people to back him up. Bear goes for the crazy shit to sell TV. Les doesn't have that luxury; he can't even contact help. If he doesn't show up in the seven days, they go look for him. Les Stroud is much more believable. That feces water thing is bullshit... Bear is completely stupid.

      --
      -SaNo
    5. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Why use an extra stick? Location and time can be estimated with reasonable accuracy using a single stick (or other shadow-casting object).

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    6. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... before retiring to the hotel buffet.

    7. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, beaver fever ain't so bad. Every outdoors man or woman should get it at least once.

      In all seriousness, learn how to survive and don't go where you are beyond your skill set. You'll never catch me in Beruit because I don't have the survival skill set for there. Vegas, either. The Chugach? Hells to the yeah.

    8. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a fever, and the only thing that can cure it is more beaver!

    9. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by symes · · Score: 1

      That's pretty harsh - Grylls is ex special forces, he knows his stuff and what he presents is very different to Les Stroud. Ray Mears is another one who enjoys a good quality of life, but I found his interviews with people who had survived under difficult circumstances very interesting. At the end of the day, all three could probably look after themselves under extreme circumstances, read a map and probably more importantly instil in their viewers that common sense is the most valuable item to take on any trip.

    10. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by blair1q · · Score: 1

      But only if it was in the script.

    11. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, Les had a sat phone, he was capable of calling for help and did at least twice. But in general you are right, whatever Bear does do the exact opposite whereas Les may actually give you some decent pointers.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Les Shroud can contact his team in an emergency, he's stated it before on the show.

      But I do agree that what Les does is more helpful if you're trying to learn something, Bear wants the "wow" factor. Bear seems to try and show the worst case scenarios while Les takes on the more common instances of people having to survive.

      If I ever got lost somewhere in the wilderness, I'd be more than thrilled to have either of them with me.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    13. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Graff · · Score: 4, Informative

      Les doesn't have that luxury; he can't even contact help. If he doesn't show up in the seven days, they go look for him.

      Les isn't that crazy, he's stated several times that he does take a locater device with him but it's only used in an extreme emergency. However the rest of it is true. He doesn't have anyone with him and he does everything on his own - including the multi-angle and long-distance shots.

      There have been quite a few "shock factor" things that Bear Grylls has done that will probably get you killed if you did them out in the wilderness. For example, that whole thing about putting urine up your rectum is a horrible idea. The amount of water you could absorb that way would be negligible and you risk perforating the mucosa of the rectal wall and/or introducing infection.

      Perhaps Bear Grylls really does know something about survival techniques but he throws in so many crazy ideas that it's tough to separate what's sensible from what's radical. Les Stroud walks you through the concepts and presents you with solid ideas for survival that have the best chance for getting you out alive, even if they aren't flashy.

    14. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by radl33t · · Score: 2

      Les Stroud is a whiny bitch who doesn't really know anything. As with Bear, Les is, at best, entertainment. Watch his documentary on off grid living if you want to see true foolishness. Maybe it makes you feel nice that such a clumsy idiot can get along in the wilderness. I don't know. However, there is no legitimate comparison between the survivalist skill sets of Bear Grylls and Les Stroud. Bear Gyrlls will eat Les Strouds arm to survive. Les Stroud will weep while his one remaining arm strums a somber chord on his cigar box ukulele.

    15. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt that Bear Grylls has some pretty mad skills. What I don't like is how he presents certain things as if they were actually valid survival techniques for the average person, instead of admitting that he's just trying to be impressive. Sometimes it's stemming up a ridiculous chimney climb in tennis shoes, sometimes it's constructing a rope swing from a flimsy vine and then swinging across a 200 foot chasm, or climbing a rickety tree to take a look at the terrain ("It's hilly"), or tackling a wild board and killing it with a knife... All of which are probably decent survival techniques for Bear Grylls, but for most other people doing any of these things is a GUARANTEED way to get killed.

      Sure, at the beginning of the show they throw up that disclaimer, but the guy's ATTITUDE during the show is more like "Watch me and learn these techniques, so you can save yourself if you're ever lost in a desert/deep forest/ice plateau." It's suicidal to try to do most of the things this guy is doing.

    16. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      I don't know...Knowing how to inflict explosive diarrhoea on oneself doesn't seem a terribly handy survival skill to me.

    17. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That feces water thing is bullshit...

      You, sir, have a keen eye for the obvious.

    18. Re:Bear Grylls don't need no stinkin' GPS by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      For example, that whole thing about putting urine up your rectum is a horrible idea.

      I wonder where someone called "Bear" got the inspiration for that one?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. GPS: 90% accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even in major cities, GPS will (occasionally but cheerfully) lead you into parking lots, streets that don't even exist... (Anecdote: Once, while driving 65+ down a highway, My lovely little unit startled me with a "Turn Left!" command out of nowhere. Very fun.) Even if the directions are 100% correct, you'll sometimes see a better, legal way to get where you want to go (U-turns, for example).

    I'm sorry to know that other people were as stupid as I have been. Treat your GPS instructions as ADVICE, and keep your eyes open!

    1. Re:GPS: 90% accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite was receiving an instruction to turn left, through the tunnel wall, and start driving on the road that was 30 feet above where I was driving.

      Unlike the people in this story, rather than blindly following it, I decided to ignore its advice.

  14. Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA:

    "I'm pulling my hair," he said. "I was never able to reach a single human with Google Earth Maps. But in their system, they have a way you can let them know something is wrong. And over the course of a year, I was able to get their maps updated."

    This was the least surprising part of the article. I'm becoming increasingly convinced that they don't actually have any human beings over there at all, and GLaDOS or whatever is running the show entirely.

    1. Re:Google? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "I'm pulling my hair," he said. "I was never able to reach a single human with Google Earth Maps. But in their system, they have a way you can let them know something is wrong. And over the course of a year, I was able to get their maps updated."

      This was the least surprising part of the article. I'm becoming increasingly convinced that they don't actually have any human beings over there at all, and GLaDOS or whatever is running the show entirely.

      "Congratulations, the test is now over."

      "It was a fun test, and we're all impressed at how much you won. The test is over."
        -- GLaDOS, 2007

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  15. "More and more Americans" == 5? by drb226 · · Score: 1

    5 deaths are mentioned. I see no other evidence in this article of deaths. The assertion that "More and more Americans are dying in deserts and wildernesses because they rely on their GPS units" is extremely vague, and almost entirely sensationalist speculation.

    1. Re:"More and more Americans" == 5? by alienzed · · Score: 1

      It's because in previous years there was no commercially accessible GPS solution. And we all know that 5 must be an infinite times larger than 0; heck I can't even find the number to multiply 0 by to get 5!

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    2. Re:"More and more Americans" == 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can't undie(OMG ZOMBIES!) so the list of 'deaths by GPS' will of course grow every year.

      ps. I'm not arguing that americans are people, and I don't know if you can undie or not.

    3. Re:"More and more Americans" == 5? by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      I suspect that there are a fairly large number who were led out by their GPS but were rescued before they expired.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    4. Re:"More and more Americans" == 5? by dwillden · · Score: 1

      No it's not. They mention five in Death Valley, we get a couple a year trying to cross uncrossable sections of Utah, most have been saved, but a few have not. And we see more of em every year. Each case costs a bit in search and rescue funds, which we can sometimes recove if we find them in time. If we don't find them in time, we can't recoup the money from corpses.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    5. Re:"More and more Americans" == 5? by drb226 · · Score: 1

      In no way do I wish to minimize the value of the people whose lives are lost. It is certainly tragic, and merits raising awareness that you can't always rely just on a GPS.

      However, when someone says "x because y", without any sort of official study, the Slashdotter in me immediately starts thinking "correlation != causation".

      We see more of em every year

      Do you have any published numbers for that?

  16. Bogus story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These anecdotes are interesting and all, but I prefer articles with actual statistics:
    http://www.slate.com/id/2264778/

    But I guess I'm just a nerd like that.

  17. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Slashdot banner covers up the headline.. film at 11, 10 central

  18. DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by scribblej · · Score: 3, Informative

    No really. Talk about depressing. It's about a six-year old kid and his mom, the kid dies. That's sad enough, but they have to give you some horrible details and imagery that's incredibly depressing.

    I'm gunna go run a hot bath and slit my wrists now. Or maybe make some toast.

    1. Re:DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I read it.

      And I've got to say that, yes, it is depressing, but at the same time, these people really have only themselves to blame. I mean, driving into Death Valley without any knowledge of the area, without even a map, without water, without... anything? Just "I'll turn on my GPS and the friendly voice will tell me where to go"? Sheesh.

      At least the woman survived. Here's hoping she will get over killing her son with her own stupidity, which is essentially what she did.

    2. Re:DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's depressing, yes. The problem is that they partly reach the right conclusion, partly don't.

      Here's MY takeaway from this article:

      GPS isn't accurate.
      It can lead you places you're not prepared for.
      If you're not able to think fast on your feet and have survival skills, you can be taken places that WILL GET YOU KILLED if you're trusting that GPS unit.
      Even if you're skilled and can do better than the average in places like Death Valley, you can STILL get in situations that CAN KILL YOU if you blindly trust the things.

      Sometimes you need a grisly object lesson to learn these cruel facts of that which we call "life" even in our current "modern" civilization.

    3. Re:DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Don't worry, we've already not read the article.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I finished reading The Selfish Gene a couple of hours ago. Weird to find this article. Sad, yes, but also thought-provoking...

      We humans may or may not be living in the age of the "memes", but nature is still the same old cruel bitch she's always been.

    5. Re:DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What article? You mean the summary or the comments?

    6. Re:DON'T READ THE ARTICLE by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Spoiler Alert!

      Thanks a lot dick!

  19. I suspect conspiracy. by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reminds me of a background element in the "Girl Genius" comic.

    A candy dispenser ball, filled with candies in big glass sphere, and a pretty poster over it, written in big friendly colorful letters:

    .....POISON......
    Illiteracy reduction program

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:I suspect conspiracy. by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, considering the kinds of people who populate Girl Genius, having a Poison-dispensing machine fits right in. I imagine the Sparks (unstable geniuses) or their minions might take the poison for fun to test their ability to diagnose and cure it while suffering from the effects, or use them on their enemies

  20. Fearless by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    The first guy I knew who had a GPS told me, "This thing can make you absolutely fearless." The dangers seemed pretty minimal in the Northern Virginia suburbs, but it's clear that one must respect the environment, as some places can be deadly. Thanks for posting a sobering article.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Fearless by radtea · · Score: 1

      The first guy I knew who had a GPS told me, "This thing can make you absolutely fearless."

      Back when sonar depth sounders were becoming cheap and common there was a story about a sinking near where I lived. The skipper of a fishing boat was crusing along watching his newly-installed depth sounder, and stove in the bow of his boat against a cliff that dropped shear into the water. The boat sank, and local legend has it that it's still there, a few hundred feet down.

      I have no idea if the story is true, but it's plausible, given the local geography. In either case, it was one of those socially valuable tales that reminded everyone to keep an eye on where they were going, not just how much water was under the keel.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    2. Re:Fearless by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The first guy I knew who had a GPS told me, "This thing can make you absolutely fearless."

      Back when sonar depth sounders were becoming cheap and common there was a story about a sinking near where I lived. The skipper of a fishing boat was crusing along watching his newly-installed depth sounder, and stove in the bow of his boat against a cliff that dropped shear into the water. The boat sank, and local legend has it that it's still there, a few hundred feet down.

      I have no idea if the story is true, but it's plausible, given the local geography. In either case, it was one of those socially valuable tales that reminded everyone to keep an eye on where they were going, not just how much water was under the keel.

      Sounds pretty much like the definition of an urban legend to me.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  21. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by royallthefourth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you actually talk like this in person, then you are probably the most disgusting, insufferable asshole that anyone around you has ever met.

  22. A little cleaning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a little chlorine for the gene pool...

  23. gadgets suppress the preparation instinct by cats-paw · · Score: 1

    of course not that many people seem to have it in the first place, but now they
    think they can really avoid spending time understanding what they are doing thanks to gadgets.

    people wouldn't get into trouble if they spent just some small amount of time planning where they were
    going and alternate routes to get there.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:gadgets suppress the preparation instinct by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I think that sums it up. When I am making a trip to unfamiliar destinations, I look up how to get there on Google maps. I don't just get the directions, I familiarize myself with the roads along the way and with alternate routes to my destination. In particular, I attempt to ascertain the nature of the roads I will be traversing (are they narrow, are they major arteries, are they dirt roads/alleys, etc). Then I print out the Google maps directions (and the maps if it is an unusually difficult place to get to). Additionally, I seek information from anyone I know who is familiar with the area as to road construction or other potential hazards/obstructions. Then I program my GPS and follow its directions unless they are going to take me through one of the previously identified problem areas. If I am going to someplace that is environmentally hazardous (desert or other semi-wilderness area), I will, also, make sure that I have a relatively recent map of the area as well.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:gadgets suppress the preparation instinct by eltonito · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I concur, but I'd also argue that certain gadgets also suppress ones danger instinct, which is highly relevant in the cases presented by the article. The stranded drivers all sensed they were making the wrong move leading up to their incidents, but they failed to act on it because they allowed the gadget pre-empted or overrode their instincts. These weren't necessarily unintelligent people, they simply trusted the technology more than their instincts which lead to a series of poor choices.

      As much as I'd love to crack jokes about Darwinism in these cases, I can look back on my life and find several instances where my reliance on a product/gadget/technology got me into trouble. I imagine most people could find similar moments somewhere in their past. The difference is that those mistakes weren't as serious, didn't get publicized and they likely didn't occur in Death Valley.

  24. Three cheers for GPS navigators! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 0

    There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

    Crossing dodgy terrain with GPS just provides another way for the floaters to be filtered out of the gene pool.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  25. gps is the issue. by luther349 · · Score: 1

    gps as been around for a very long time. when they started the entire turn by tun directions and mass marking them it became a problem. so rather then treating it like a device of reference like where you are on a map people have started using them as replacements for maps or outright relying on them. i have a laptop with gps but i still get old school directions like from mapquest or google maps or even other people. and use the gps to help me see if i am indeed coming to the turn or exit the directions stated. but if my gps was to fail and it has or simply give misdirection i still have my direction i wrote down or a plain old map.

  26. The Problems with GPS by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem with GPS units is that they charge almost as much for map updates as they do for the GPS unit itself. In my case my TomTom cost $99 and the map updates are $84.

    The other problem is even the map updates are frequently best guesses.

    And rental companies are notorious for issuing un-updated GPS units. Back a couple of years ago, I flew into Norfolk, VA and rented a car. The GPS unit wasn't aware that they'd moved U.S. 17 so much of the time it showed the car as driving over water. I just followed the signs for 17.

    And more recently coming home from North Carolina my TomTom was trying to tell me to get off I-95. I finally shut little Miss Navigator off and we got home just fine without her.

    1. Re:The Problems with GPS by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      Do a little research on the net and you can find updates for many GPS units available for free at sites like http://gpsunderground.com/

    2. Re:The Problems with GPS by radtea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The other problem is even the map updates are frequently best guesses.

      It would seem that another problem is that these units have a city-dweller's notion of what consitutes a "road" and a "car". Outside of cities the concept of "road" is a lot vaguer, and vehicle type is a lot more relevant. I've been down "roads" in a Willies Jeep that you wouldn't want to take in anything else, and used "roads" that are only seasonably passable. Some "roads" are only drivable in late summer and mid-winter (too muddy at other times); some are impassable in winter due to snow or spring due to flooding; some are passable only in winter due to to freezing (and only then if they've been plowed); and so on.

      There is no reason why most of this knowledge could not be respresented in a GPS navigation unit, but the people who write software for them apparently don't ever actually use them go out of the city.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:The Problems with GPS by blair1q · · Score: 1

      An inaccurate map ought to be a warranty fix.

    4. Re:The Problems with GPS by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I at one point in my life wrote software for a GPS navigation unit.

      At least back when I was writing that kind of software a few years ago, the map data we had rated roads on a scale from something like 0 to 7, with 0 being a side street or back road and 7 being a major divided highway. There wasn't any storage for "You really don't want to take this road in the middle of winter" or "Dirt road going through swamp that has a tendency to sink" or anything like that. So without that data, there's no possible way for the software to account for it. And while it might seem stupid that this would happen, there are 2 fairly logical reasons why it did:
      1. When the formats for the map data were being decided, every bit counted, so they really wanted to limit the number of possible road ratings.
      2. On the flip side, they didn't want to create a situation where you couldn't navigate to somebody's home way out in the middle of nowhere because the road that it was on wasn't good enough to be rated.

      So that meant including the roads you really didn't want to take, and marking them at the lowest possible rating. But that meant that if the sane route was too much longer than the insane route, an algorithm would take you along the insane route because it appeared to its graph-theory-addled-brain to be shorter and faster. In short, for any of the GPS algorithms, garbage in, garbage out.

      The correct way to use a GPS is in combination with more careful planning. Use paper or online maps to figure out your options, write that down or print it out, then use the GPS to handle situations where you end up off course (either intentionally because you need to stop and get gas or something, or unintentionally because you can't follow directions).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  27. One Problem, One Question by apparently · · Score: 1
    Problem:

    Near where the road ends, Nattrass followed the tire tracks that turned onto "a closed road in the wilderness area going over several small bushes and rocks lined along the road to designate closure," her report says.

    Pro-tip! "Small bushes and rocks lined along a road" do not "designate closure." You know what designate's closure? A fucking sign that says "Hey asshole, this road is closed, back your shit up or get fucked." Humans have been communicating with pictures since at least the Paleolithic, like actually discernible drawings: cavemen didn't settle for taking a dump on a wall, sticking a leaf on top, and being satisfied that said configuration designated "auroch."

    Question:

    Things went more smoothly with TomTom, a major manufacturer of GPS units for cars. "I had a representative right here. He was real professional. I was able to sit down and say, 'Nope, that doesn't exist,' " Callagan said. That representative was Matthew Rinaldi, a geographic sourcing analyst for the company. "I knew there were issues in Death Valley, consumer-wide, for all GPS devices, not just TomTom," Rinaldi said. In all, Rinaldi said he made adjustments to 185 Death Valley road segments in the company's navigation database and removed about 50 altogether.

    So I have to fork over a few bucks to TomTom so that their GPS won't kill me? Thanks TomTom! You can GoGo FuckFuck YourselfYourself.

    1. Re:One Problem, One Question by onepoint · · Score: 1

      with your statement
      >>So I have to fork over a few bucks to TomTom so that their GPS won't kill me? Thanks TomTom! You can GoGo FuckFuck YourselfYourself.

      you should really reconsider it. Here is a company that made a point of trying to be helpful, while others are not so responsive... something like this might make sense to me when making a purchase... a company that updates it's data...
      now I don't know anything about the cost of the updates but if I am heading to the desert, I might just take a tomtom as a back up tool.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    2. Re:One Problem, One Question by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      cavemen didn't settle for taking a dump on a wall, sticking a leaf on top, and being satisfied that said configuration designated "auroch."

      Even if they did, such marking would not have survived until it was found by archeologists, so we wouldn't know. Maybe they did.

    3. Re:One Problem, One Question by SimplyGeek · · Score: 1

      Your first point is bull. Have you ever been out hiking? In cases where the trail is too far from civilization and the local authority doesn't have the resources, then you won't find nicely written signs at every turn. Its in those cases that available, natural materials are formed in an unnatural way to convey a message. For example it can be a line of rocks and sticks forming an obviously manmade line indicating the side of a trail. If where a trail splits and one split is a dead end, there could be large rocks formed perpendicular to the trail to indicate you shouldn't go that way. And so on and so on. It's called the wilderness for a reason. They can't put up nice signs and markers everywhere or it'd be just another suburban park.

    4. Re:One Problem, One Question by apparently · · Score: 1

      Your first point is bull. Have you ever been out hiking? In cases where the trail is too far from civilization and the local authority doesn't have the resources, then you won't find nicely written signs at every turn.

      I don't hike while driving my car, and sticks and bushes don't make good markers for people driving at night time.

    5. Re:One Problem, One Question by apparently · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, as a TomTom owner, I'm glad to see that they're on top of this. But when it's an issue of an outdated map potentially putting a person in a life-threatening situation, I take issue with having to spend $49.95 to update the content of a $200 piece of hardware.

  28. who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Kim

    this story haunts me. because i could have done this. any of us could

    and for those of you assholes talking about the darwin awards or death by stupidity: i think arrogant hubris is a pretty good candidate gene for being weeded from the homo sapiens gene pool. when stories like these arise, there's two types of people: those who feel saddened at a pointless death, aka, human beings, and those who think that the occasion is an opportunity to trumpet how smart they are, aka, assholes with an ego problem and lacking empathy

    you're so fucking smart and immune to tragedy, huh? until a tragedy happens to you or yours. try showing some basic simple respect for the dead, asswipes

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Red+Flayer · · Score: 0

      Oh boo fucking hoo.

      The fact is, Kim and his wife made several mistakes that led to his death.

      It's not hubris to recognize that others made mistakes. It's not hubris to attempt to learn from their mistakes. Let these people's deaths be learning examples for the rest of us.

      There is no reason I should feel saddened at pointless death. It doesn't make me any less human to not give a flying fuck about that dude. I didn't know him, no one I care about knew him personally. At the very least the publicity surrounding his death had the useful purpose of teaching people to respect the wilderness. Seriously, who the fuck takes secondary or tertiary passes in remote Oregon or Washington State in late November without adequate survival and signaling equipment? Who ignores warnings that the road may be impassable?

      Jack London's "To Build a Fire" should be required reading. There's more than one important lesson to be learned from that story.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, they used paper maps, didn't read them correctly, thought a town was 4 miles away when 16 miles away was a closed lodge, ignored warning signs about snowy roads, decided to not take a major interstate in bad weather, then didn't have the sense to turn around when the weather proved bad (this has happened to me, I've taken a route and said "fuck this going another way").

      This is a tragedy indeed: he already has 2 kids.

    3. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure anybody can make a bad decision at any time, but it doesn't mean the mistake isn't stupid. Death by stupidity is a normal part of life. It's not an issue of being inherently smarter. It's an issue of "somebody's going to do it". Ideally, the survivors learn from the mistakes of others and don't repeat history.

      Instead of returning to the exit, they consulted a highway map and picked a secondary route that skirted the Wild Rogue Wilderness, a remote area of southwestern Oregon.

      From James Kim, I learn that I shouldn't choose alternate routes that take me near wilderness unless I'm prepared to spend time in the wilderness.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by oracleguy01 · · Score: 1

      Yes that was very tragic however that wasn't really "death by GPS", they were using paper maps. They got trapped due to a combination of BLM not having the gate closed for a logging road that was impassable for most of the winter, not turning back soon enough and missing certain road signs.

      What happened to the Kims was sad and certainly could happen to a lot of people for sure but isn't the target of the article in question.

    5. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by RendonWI · · Score: 2

      James Kim was using a paper map, not a GPS. So not really sure what that has to do with a story about death by GPS.

    6. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      Therefore, send not to know
      For whom the bell tolls,
      It tolls for thee.

    7. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      What happened to James Kim and his family is of course very sad and shouldn't happen to anyone, but.. it's also very different from people who blindly follow their GPS, even so far as to ignoring all markings and signs around them and then driving to rocks/waterbed/etc. Having a GPS simply is no excuse whatsoever for ignoring local markings and regulations, and yes, it does sound rather arrogant, but ignoring everything around you and then running into trouble is all your own damn fault.

    8. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely different scenario.

      Mr Kim relied on a routing system that did not differentiate between all weather and seasonal roads. It was an issue with the software. He was merely trying to get home and followed the route given to him. That route should not have been given as it indicated a road that should not be used in winter.

      The scenario in the article is about people who rent SUVs and head out into the desert. Here are some of the mistakes they make.
      1. Not enough fuel.
      2. No experience driving off road.
      3. Expecting all roads and trails to be marked on the map.
      4. No idea how to read a map.
      5. No backup map in case of a problem with the GPS.
      6. Not enough water even for a day.
      7. No signalling device in case they get stuck. Cell phones do not work everywhere.
      8. Do not retrace their path when things get too rough.

      Tragedy is when something unexpected happens and someone dies. What the article is talking about is consciously entering a dangerous environment and relying on GPS to save them. That is not tragedy that is stupidity.

    9. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should do a movie about this. Maybe they should throw in some zombies as well.

    10. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about 5 miles from where he died. I didn't die. But then again, I'm not an idiot.

    11. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      when i talk about lack of empathy and arrogant hubris, it helps not to come charging in and making yourself a poster child for exactly this sort of character defect

      "There is no reason I should feel saddened at pointless death"

      it's called empathy. it is the basis for all of human morality. that's the reason why you should feel saddened. other than that, a simple basic human respect for the dead is reason why you might tone down your i'm-so-smart-and-so-immune-to-simple-human-mistakes arrogant ignorance

      "It doesn't make me any less human to not give a flying fuck about that dude."

      actually, yes it does. if you lack basic human empathy you lack one the defining characteristics of what makes us human

      simple human reciprocity means i respect you, you respect me. i feel for you. you feel for me. yet you come in with your stellar social skills making the pre-emptive statement: "feel nothing for me because i feel nothing for you". what a social genius

      unless of course you believe you are immune from any need for aid or mutual support, that you are an infallible island that requires no support, even emergency, from your fellow man. then go ahead and preemptively announce your "i'm special" status. like i said, genius

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    12. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by jklovanc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually Mr. Kim's death had nothing to do with GPS. According to Mrs. Kim, they planned their route using a paper map and didn't see the note stating "Not all Roads Advisable, Check Weather Conditions." They also passed three prominent warning signs that state: "Bear Camp Rd. May Be Blocked By Snowdrifts."

    13. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you're so fucking smart and immune to tragedy, huh? until a tragedy happens to you or yours. try showing some basic simple respect for the dead, asswipes"

      everything dies eventually. for some reason i don't grieve for those who die. it may be a tragedy to you but others see it simply as the circle of life. i just lost my grandma, no tears from me, even when my mom cried at the loss of her mother. oh and i don't consider myself as particularly smart either, i am reading a site that claims computer speed increases to absurdity.

    14. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think most folks would make his mistake. I moved to Oregon 20 year ago. My wife grew up right on the route right off the I-5 that they took. If you look at a map you can see that HYW 42 near Roseburg goes to the coast, and HWY 199 goes out of Grants Pass, heads south into California and then over to the coast. Any other road on the map that goes from the I-5 to the coast in Southern Oregon is just a thin line. It is never a good idea to trust that a "thin line" on a map will take you 50 to 100 miles. Freeway, yes. Highway, yes. Thin line with no name on it...bad idea.

      As an aside, the first time I took my wife to the coast (via Hwy 199) when she was still living in Grants Pass, I asked her "does that route out by your parents place go to the coast. And she said "Err, well, it does...but it really is not that good of road, no one drives that way to the coast" In 35 years, neither she nor her parents have every tried to go to the coast that way. They would instead drive an extra 2 hours down into California and back up the coast to avoid a road that was right outside their door

    15. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Troll

      making fun of the dead and indicating zero empathy has only one meaning for me: you are loudly announcing that you have an inferior set of genes that should rightfully be removed from the population in order to improve humanity. no, i'm not talking eugenics, simple darwinian evolution has led to humans who function as a group during hard times and therefore have a survival advantage over arrogant loners with a god complex: immune from their own stupiditiy, immune from mistakes, immune from accidents that requires the aid of others. yeah, so superior. so its just a matter of time before your defective genes go by the wayside. moron

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    16. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your example was excellent, and I commend your empathy for others as an example to follow, with head and heart.

    17. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Dracolytch · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, more broadly, and more important:

      If you're lost/stranded, never leave the protection of your car.
      Please Remember What's First!

      PRWF

      Protection
      Rescue
      Water
      Food

      Importance is in order. Do not give up protection without a extremely high chance of rescue.

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    18. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      I don't breed and I don't associate with others. I've been out of the gene pool for quite a while; the water's too cold.

      The only time I interfere with others is to fix their problems; I've got enough useful skills to make use of myself. When I have my own problems, I handle them myself. One of the larger reasons I never date is because if I do something wrong, if it doesn't work out, if I start having financial trouble, whatever, it incurs hardships on someone else. Not acceptable.

      I have zero empathy for the dead, at all. Empathy for the dead is what's wrong with this country. It's what leads us to say, oh, it's so horrible people might die, we should play nice games with the terrorists when it comes to hostages, we should take away guns and teach people to be "non-violent," we should make sure nobody can fight because then nobody can get hurt in fights. Then the incidence of hostage situations goes up (but we lose fewer in each--ultimately more, but it looks cuter and more sensitive to life), we take away peoples' ability to defend themselves (fewer people are lethal, but the lethal ones have free rein), and we make sure people are both incapable of defending themselves and too scared AND incompetent to defend others (thus removing psychological barriers to violent crimes and possible even if unlikely mitigation factors when those barriers fail).

      Think about that. We don't want everyone having guns, or knowing how to fight, because we might see violent things happen. That would be bad, because people get hurt; we can't facilitate that, it wouldn't be right. Never mind the long term impact of more people dying overall.

      Japan is passing a law to make martial arts study compulsory in schools, starting in elementary school levels (that means third graders know Judo). This has gotten backlash because about 4 kids per year DIE of injuries sustained training in Judo. It's too many, and people feel we should make everyone defenseless sheep at the mercy of whoever feels like harming them, mostly arguing about how horrible some 50 deaths over the past 12 years are. I don't care. 50 people are dead, I don't fucking care. One hundred MILLION people are not going to die because they got lunged at with a knife; they are going to break your arm and take your knife while you're on the way through the air. The small subset of a few hundred or thousand of them over the next ten years that actually would have died in that projection is smaller than one hundred million, yes; it's bigger than the few tens of people that might die of judo-related injury over the next decade, a net positive, so screw them they're dead.

      Sometimes your existence is only meant to serve as a warning to others.

    19. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, there were a number of stupid decisions on James Kim's part. First, he had plenty of opportunities to turn around and get back on the main road before becoming stranded, he choose to just keep driving. Secondly, he selected a route that was marked on the map as a park/wilderness area. Thirdly he did all this with his wife and family in the car.

      If in doubt, turn around... don't just keep driving blindly into the middle of nowhere.

      I feel sorry for his family's tragic loss, but that doesn't mean that he didn't make a bunch of bad choices.

      David

    20. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What it really comes down to in all of these situations is you should have a survival kit in your car and you should be dressed appropriately for the season. You kit should contain:

      all the basic first aid supplies,
      a blanket,
      a space blanket,
      if you are in a place with harser winter conditions, a can of Crisco (for eating potentially, it keeps a very long time if sealed and packs lots of calories),
      open end wrenches of the most common sizes used on your vehicle,
        flashlight,
      screw driver,
      booster cables,
      couple bottles of watter,
      a box of matches,
      a candle,
      a solid knife,
      and some plastic (like a tarp),
      a cloth bag to carry these items in,
      A change of clothes is also a good idea.

      Then you should always plan just a little ahead, if you expect to be going any place that might be more than an hours walk from help you should check these things prior to departure. None of that takes up much space or will add much weight to your trunk. If you have those items you should be able survive in place for a long time until help arrives, or hike out in almost any conditions if you must.

    21. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      James Kim made one bad decision; everything else he did was just trying to save his family. The lesson here is that sometimes even simple little decisions can have tragic consequences. C'est la vie.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    22. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't make me any less human to not give a flying fuck about that dude.

      I'm sure it doesn't make you feel any less human. From the sounds of it, you've left your humanity behind long ago.

    23. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i didn't read your comment after your first sentence: if you don't breed, stop commenting on breeding. furthermore, you are associating with someone right now, on an internet forum. which means you are an absurdity to me, because you apparently don't have a grasp on the subject matter. you can't lucidly comment on survival skills and the gene pool if you have no interest in either. in short time, you will be nothing but dust, and your genes won't matter, by your own choice. which makes everything else you wrote above a farce

      you don't matter. not because i say so, but because you choose not to matter. so what the hell do you think you are talking about? if i tell you i don't eat sushi and then proceed to try to lecture you on sushi, are you going to listen to me? if i tell you i don't speak spanish and then proceed to lecture you on spanish verb tenses, are you going to invest much value in my words? now you know what i think of you: you're absurd and deeply confused. not because of your choices, but because you think you have anything of value to say after the choices you have made. don't breed, don't associate. good for you. now stop thinking you therefore have anything useful to say on either subject

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    24. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Achra · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Be careful with your generalizations. This could not have happened to me and here is why:
      1) I would never have turned off the paved road on my way to ANOTHER STATE
      2) I would most certainly never have decided to drive down a snow covered logging road in the winter
      3) If I had somehow managed to become as stuck as James Kim (which requires a giant leap of stupidity), I would have IMMEDIATELY attempted to hike out while my strength was still good. I'm talking first thing in the morning.
      4) If I had gotten to the point that I was hiking out... I would have followed the road. I would most certainly not have attempted to go overland without map or compass.
      5) I would have AT NO POINT eaten any poisonous berries.

      In nature, every bad decision counts. If you insist on stacking enough bad decisions on top of bad decisions, sooner or later you will die.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    25. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when stories like these arise, there's two types of people: those who feel saddened at a pointless death, aka, human beings, and those who think that the occasion is an opportunity to trumpet how smart they are, aka, assholes with an ego problem and lacking empathy

      False dichotomies are lies.

    26. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by izomiac · · Score: 1

      If "any of us could" make a fatal mistake, then any of us will. If we ridicule stupid decisions we'll laugh aloud while making a mental note to not be stupid. Few people are callous enough to ridicule a person's death in front of anyone who who was emotionally attached to them, but for the people we aren't attached to, IMHO, it's fine to laugh. It's what separates their tragic death from the tragic but unavoidable ones, which makes it more likely we'll learn from their folly. Plus nobody has the emotional capacity (or time) to sincerely grieve the loss of every person (2 per second, last I heard), nor is it a healthy way to live your life.

    27. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      i didn't read your comment after your first sentence

      Ignorance detected. Ignorance DEFINED.

      It's funny you think that putting your dick in something and making babies suddenly means you understand the gene pool. Complete logical failing.

      Also, if you have a deep understanding of marine biology, toxicology, and food safety, I might find your advice about the relative safety of sushi based on origin of the food (wild caught vs farmed, tank sanitary conditions and parasites, temperature and storage conditions and times, etc) and the appropriate methods for manufacturing, handling, storing, and serving the sashimi quite useful. On the other hand, I eat sushi and I'm prone to eat things that are even a little off because, quite simply, it can't make me sick; I get a stomach ache and some bad gas at worst, and occasionally have found amusement when a restaurant served a bad dish that sent a coworker (my manager at the time) home for 3 days or to the hospital (oh, the IT guy) for 2 weeks paralyzed (he recovered fully, btw) while I spent the next 2 hours complaining that my tummy feels funny, and then farting a lot. You probably don't want to take my advice on much, although I'm prone to point out "safe for me" food as directly NOT recommended when I find something mildly questionable (probably more overkill; it's probably safe for everyone, but I'll take issue with things).

    28. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but it doesn't mean the mistake isn't stupid."

      You failed to understand the concept of respect. The whole point is that you don't just assume negative stereotypes like "stupid", but instead respect their humanity, put yourself in their place and imagine how the same thing could happen easily to you, since you're human as well. Anything less is arrogant, self-absorbed crap.

    29. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe that James Kim died from stupidity in the sense that he was a moron. He was obviously an intelligent person however he clearly failed at some very basic survival instincts. Rather he died from his belief that 'it can't happen to us/me' which in my opinion would fall under negligence. I checked some maps to see where the Tututun Lodge was and where Mr. Kim's original route would have taken him. From RT 42 (his missed turn) to where he turned onto Bear Camp Road is slightly under an HR. There are several obvious things Mr. Kim should have known but clearly ignored. Even after consulting his map he should have realized that the twisting zig zag secondary roads would take longer to travel then the return time and subsequent travel along RT 42 to his destination. He failed to do so. He also failed to think that it might be possible that they could get stuck in the heavy snow on secondary roads. The Saab 9-2x wagon he was driving most likely had AWD which may have contributed to his belief that 'We won't get stuck, we have AWD'. He missed several (3) prominent warning signs indicating that the road may even be blocked by snowdrifts. He then turned onto an UNPAVED logging road (ok, so the gate was open, but he still turned onto a dirt road with a gate! Obviously not a main road.) without recognizing it for what it was. Then after getting stuck or stopping because he was tired (It's unclear) he made 1 more mistake. His ultimate mistake that every 3 year old learns is 'When lost, stay where you are.'

      I am not saddened by Mr. Kim's death because I did not know him. You can't blame a death like this on any map or GPS. It was lack of good judgment in several critical moments that cost him his life. Is that stupid? Yes. Is it sad? Not to me, it's part of life. We all die somehow, eventually, it is inevitable. It is honorable that Mr. Kim, after stranding his family, made a last ditch attempt to leave the safety of his vehicle and reach help.

    30. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by MrL0G1C · · Score: 0

      Is your keyboard broken or something? Use your shift key you lazy git - or do you not empathise with the rest of the slashdotters who are reading what you've typed. Also that dot on the end of a sentance, fullstop - is it really so hard to use one?

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    31. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      you don't have to like breeders. but you have to understand that without children, there is no humanity. no humanity, all of your bloviating has no meaning. and you're lecturing me on ignorance and failing logic?

      i mean you are arguing with me. which means you care about something. whatever that something is, consider that without breeders, that something will cease to exist

      unless of course, as i suspect, you care about your own ego, and little more. of course children are a taxation on that, so children must be explained away. in which case the universe begins and ends within your own little world (which will soon come to a mortal end). in such a sheltered universe, i understand how little the logic and reason of the real world can matter

      so by all means, i apologize for piercing your personal mythology that allows you to believe in the superiority of your own views, within your own little universe. this is an argument i cannot win on those parameters

      but please understand that if you openly choose to become a dead end, you are freely and openly choosing not to matter. and so i will respect your choice and believe, indeed, nothing you say matters

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    32. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by HMS+Hood · · Score: 1

      I lived in Portland OR when that happened and I remember that being a sad, sad story. Especially the part where Mr. Kim struck out on his own in a desperate act to save his family. That tragedy is a good example of an (urban) intelligent person that was not familiar with their (rural) environment which can lead to a life-threatening situation. People who venture out of the city and into the outdoors with any kind of frequency usually have a pretty good sense of when they "took a wrong turn" onto some forest road that is quickly going nowhere. If you're gaining elevation on a gravel road, in the middle of the forest during the middle of winter,and it's snowing, you turn around. Even in summer, if you're on a forest service road that is going up - you're usually not going to come down unless you turn around. I guess the Kims just lacked any experience in that kind of environment and the result was catastrophic.

    33. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sometimes there is no right answer.

      Read wikipedia on Bear Camp Road. The Kims waited with the car for *6 days* before James struck out on foot; given the month (November -- things'll only get worse for *months*), their lack of information about where they were and whether anyone was searching for them, I might have done similarly to try to save my kids.

      12 years earlier, another man died there, starving by staying with his camper.

    34. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by ed1park · · Score: 1

      Probably the best bet.

        However, the Kim family was only rescued after they were spotted walking on a remote road by helicopter. Had they not left the car, they probably would have perished.

      And the mother who lost her child in Death Valley never left the car. Had she backtracked by foot down the road, they may have had a chance. Or not...

    35. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Empathy doesn't just kick in because a human somewhere died.

      You actually have to connect or feel similar in some way to them.

      Lack of empathy to someone you can't connect to is normal.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    36. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      They're showing more respect to the dead than you are to the living.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    37. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's probably a good idea to stay near the vehicle, but another situation where a person probably should have left their car was DeWitt Finley, who died in the same area as James Kim in 1994 because he stayed in his camper for 9 weeks.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    38. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Hi.

      My name is Sarten-X. I've done a good many stupid things in my life.

      I've jumped off a platform on a mountain and crushed a vertebra. Now I wake up every morning in pain, can't sit or stand upright for extended periods of time, and will probably need major surgery before I'm 50.

      I've grabbed an exposed wire carrying 240 volts, because a circuit breaker wasn't double-checked to be off. It felt like someone punched me in the neck.

      I parked my car on top of a sheet of ice in the middle of the woods at night. I couldn't get any traction when I tried to leave. If it weren't for a friend conveniently in the area with a truck and tow cables, I'd have been stuck out there all night in below-freezing weather, with only a single thin blanket.

      I do not assume that I will not do more stupid things in my life. I hope I don't die from something stupid, but I accept that it is possible. I certainly don't speak out of arrogance. I speak because I've learned something more, and because of that, James Kim's death does not qualify as "pointless". A pointless death is one where nothing is gained that may benefit humanity. When I die, I sincerely hope that my death contributes to the world.

      Please do not assume that I am some stereotypical "arrogant, self-centered" person. That's rather disrespectful. On the contrary, I accept that anyone, including myself, may simply have the misfortune to do something stupid, and die because of it. It is sad that Mr. Kim died. It is sadder still that we should forget his final lesson, and need to learn it again later.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    39. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by tweak13 · · Score: 1

      However, the Kim family was only rescued after they were spotted walking on a remote road by helicopter.

      I know the wikipedia article says that, but it's a perfect example of why wikipedia is not a reliable source. The wife and children were actually spotted at their vehicle as noted in this article. It's a bit lengthy, but the relevant passage is "At about 1:45 p.m. PST on Monday, rescuers were notified that a vehicle and a female waving an umbrella were spotted by a helicopter search crew." As I recall she had only gotten out of the vehicle specifically to try to flag down the helicopter.

      The husband left to try to walk to a town, and therefore took much longer to find. If he would have stayed with the vehicle he probably would have survived

    40. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 1

      From the wiki article on Bear Camp Road: In 1994, a man traveling over Bear Camp Road died after being stranded for nine weeks. The victim, Dewitt Finley, was a camper salesman from Montana. He was attempting to drive from Gold Beach to Grants Pass and became snowbound. He kept a journal while stranded on the road, and ultimately died of starvation.[7] His body wasn't recovered until May 1995, when it was discovered by a group of local teenagers.[8] There is no indication that Finley ever attempted to hike out, or ever left his camper. [b]Some accounts indicate that Finley would have likely survived if he had attempted to hike out.[/b]

      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    41. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. You sit on your computer all day and have probably never even been to any wilderness, it's easy to say with hindsight what you would do.

    42. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by metacell · · Score: 1

      It's easy to laugh at other people's ignorance, because you're not aware of your own.

    43. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Most of the fourteen year old suburbanites here on slashdot haven't exactly had a lot of experience either of tragedy or the outdoors.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    44. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      3) If I had somehow managed to become as stuck as James Kim (which requires a giant leap of stupidity)

      And every single person who has ever broken an arm or leg, or sprained an ankle or cut themselves or fallen off a ladder, is just stupid, as there are no accidents, only deliberately stupid decisions.

      5) I would have AT NO POINT eaten any poisonous berries.

      It's possible that the unfortunate Mr Kim didn't have your in-depth knowledge of plants and was unaware that they were poisonous.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I find a large logical disconnect with most people attempting to argue logic and reasoning with me, because they have none.

      It is an unfortunate fact that I can most definitely come up with any number of ways to fix the world, just little changes that will shift the overarching base of society into something that's actually god damn stable and not falling apart like it is today without the moral and rational substructure necessary to keep us out of a world like Orwell's nightmarish 1984.

      What's so unfortunate is that none of them fucking work. Society will always, generally, trend to individuals reaching more for a herd mentality, sheparded under Fearless Leader. Consider a society of people who spend 5-10 minutes a day meditating, occasionally half an hour or so. They put themselves in their own personal calm, which leads to organizing their thoughts, which leads to taking offense to the offensive things in the world like the constant tightening stranglehold on civil liberties. These are people who will develop their own philosophy, and who will rise up and concoct a bloody revolution to kill their own leaders when they are trying too hard to subjugate the people.

      A nation of martial artists, philosophers, people who sit and think about shit. What a silly little fantasy right? Who needs all that anyway, that's hokey bullshit.

      That's exactly where we'll get, too. Eventually, people will be too busy with their daily lives. I don't mean to "meditate," I mean to stop and think about anything. They'll be too busy to care. They'll start thinking, hey, we have police, the government should protect us. They need to take guns away. People need to not be violent. Save us from the terrorists. Everything they're doing is for our own good now.

      Society decays. I don't care if you can 'Save' it. Go ahead, fix it. Watch what happens. It'll fall apart again. There's any number of approaches, from trying to shift culture to trying to shift education; they all fail (education especially, since we start this social promotion thing where everyone must graduate with straight As so we make school easier).

      The root of raising a dog is to keep it convinced it's still a puppy. The way to raise a society is to convince people they are still children and thus entitled to the care and support of the government, who knows what's best for them. They grow up to be parents who understand that they beat their kids for their own good, and they take things away from their kids for their own good; the government is doing the same, no matter how abusive it seems.

      What could Winston Smith have possibly done in 1984? Jihad? Started killing people? That's crazy. His society stagnated and decayed, and anything he did would be ineffective and would fail; he would destroy whatever aji remained if he gained any attention, forcing the party to tighten its grip-- and they had the propaganda to leap decades ahead in that situation, to show people that they need protection from people like Winston, that the party is saving them.

      I have no desire to take it upon myself to "save everyone" by doing something violent and crazy like trying to stage a local revolution. That's logically ridiculous; the proper time for that is when all else HAS failed, and we currently can still make effective use of our ballot boxes-- our failing here is that we don't know how to use them. When people are being taken into the streets and shot for criticizing the government, it will be time to remove them from power by force. Unfortunately, we'll get there; hopefully I'll be dead by then.

      You see, it's paradoxical. I look around thinking, "Why is everyone allowing this to happen to the world?" The few people that see it go, "Well... we can't do anything." Nobody will even try; and the ones trying to do something are not only ineffective, but bat-shit crazy and trying to do something ELSE stupid (Libertarians, Greens, etc). And I look around and realize, "Shit... I can't do any

    46. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Bobtree · · Score: 1

      He didn't make one fatal mistake. It was more like half a dozen mistakes that were fatal in combination:

      Inadequate clothing and supplies (especially given the season and weather).
      Missing a highway exit and then choosing a poor route and leaving it.
      Failure to coordinate travel plans so somebody would know when to expect them (the search started 5 days after they left because co-workers reported him missing, but it's only a 2 day drive).
      And leaving their shelter and the roads (a vehicle is almost always found before the lost persons who abandoned it).

      It's a tragedy, but he was doomed by poor risk assessment and preparation, not a single mishap.

    47. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i didn't read anything you wrote. because i respect your choice not to matter on the future of humanity by not breeding and not associating

      it just continues to amaze me that someone who has chosen to not be part of the future of a system, continues to waste so much thought and so many words castigating it

      which means you haven't fully made a choice. you're confused

      i ask you for logical coherence, choose one:

      1. if you choose not to associate and breed, as you say, then shut up on the subject matter

      2. or, continue talking on a subject matter which obviously interests you. and then breed and associate

      if you choose #2, your first step is to lose your lame derivative mindless pessimism. it's not intelligence, it is a replacement for intelligence. society is an EMERGENT PHENOMENON. meaning, it is not static, it is derived from the intent and purposes of those within the society. therefore, your opinions are not derived from the state of society. the reality is the reverse: the state of society is derived from the opinions of those in it. with such a realization, your first step at rehabilitation is to work on your piss poor teenager level attitude

      or, as i said, choose #1: shut up and stop commenting on what you announce you are not a part of. you can't have it both ways and consider yourself to be logically coherent. your voluminous words betray your real confusion on the issues you say you choose not to be part of, but which obviously occupies a lot of your mental efforts

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    48. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Achra · · Score: 1

      And every single person who has ever broken an arm or leg, or sprained an ankle or cut themselves or fallen off a ladder, is just stupid, as there are no accidents, only deliberately stupid decisions.

      Are you saying that BY ACCIDENT, you could turn off the paved road and drive until your are stuck up to your axles in snow on a logging road on your way to another state? If you can do these things by accident, I'd say you should pay a great deal more attention to your driving. These are decisions. This is not the same as falling off a ladder.

      It's possible that the unfortunate Mr Kim didn't have your in-depth knowledge of plants and was unaware that they were poisonous.

      True. However, here's a couple of tips that will help you wherever you happen to be:
      1) If it is winter, and there are berries that the birds aren't eating, then don't eat them.
      2) If you aren't sure if a berry can be eaten, don't eat it.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    49. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Achra · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. You sit on your computer all day and have probably never even been to any wilderness, it's easy to say with hindsight what you would do.

      Ah, Ad Hominem. Must mean that you can't argue any of my points so you attack me personally.
      Just because you sit on your computer all day & have never even seen any wilderness, do not assume that is who I am.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    50. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You're pretty well spoken for someone who can't terminate a paragraph with a period, or capitalize.

      This opened on a bleeding heart cry out over a tragedy that's a simple statistic; people die every day, children die every day, and children are starving to death in other countries. This guy is not remarkable in any respect and not worth special comment.

      I'm bored of this. As a final closing, since you want to point out society as an "emergent phenomenon," I point you to H. G. Wells' "The Time Machine" for a read. The original, poorly written ramblings version... Amazon gives it away free on Kindle. His explanation for the state of society is an eventual lack of need for intelligence, which produced the evolutionary split and the completely primitive societies in the book. There's your emergent behavior.

    51. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Dracolytch · · Score: 2

      Mr. Kim didn't last the night he set out. Mr. Finley lasted 9 weeks.

      It's all about gambles and risk (so there will always be examples where the other worked), but I'd much rather put my money on something that will help me live 60x longer.

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    52. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      again, it's only interesting that someone who loudly declares how they are divested of a subject matter feels such a stirring need to comment on it. currently you are confused and incoherent. but this is temporary

      someday you'll care, and say you care

      or you won't care, and say nothing

      but your current state: voluminously explaining how much you don't care, only reveals that you care, a lot

      shakespeare: "methinks the lady doth protest too much"

      good luck on your trip back to coherence

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    53. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to laugh at other people's ignorance, because you're not aware of your own.

      It's also easy to laugh at other people's mortality when you are aware of your own. No matter what happens to other people, you've still got your life to live. Take what you can use to help yourself move on and leave behind anything that can only weigh you down or hold you back. Bad things happen all the time; if you get too caught up in them, your life will be nothing but sadness.

    54. Re:who can forget the nightmare of james kim by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      or you won't care, and say nothing

      but your current state: voluminously explaining how much you don't care, only reveals that you care, a lot

      Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to boredom.

  29. We have to design for actual people. by monk · · Score: 1

    The same problem was there with people using old or inaccurate maps in the past, but there is a definite tendency for people to believe that GPS systems are somehow more accurate and up to date. It's irrational, but it's a real phenomenon.

    Actual people will do irrational things. Pretending that people are fundamentally rational beings is irrational in itself. We have to design devices to assume irrational behavior and to take advantage of natural tendencies.

    I suggest a GPS that "sounds" stupid. Something that gives verbal queues that it should not be trusted too much. We can use some well known politicians as voice talent. On the other hand, I suppose their success invalidates my theory.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    1. Re:We have to design for actual people. by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      I suggest a GPS that "sounds" stupid. Something that gives verbal queues that it should not be trusted too much. We can use some well known politicians as voice talent. On the other hand, I suppose their success invalidates my theory.

      Don't dismiss your idea so quickly; in America, only half of people vote. Somebody has to win the election, even if nobody cares about it.

    2. Re:We have to design for actual people. by Jonner · · Score: 1

      GPS is a much more accurate tool to locate your current position than any people have previously used. However, knowing where you are is only valuable if you know where other things are, and particularly where you're going.

  30. Only bad tech is the linked page. by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tried reading the article, the screwed up page with all it's toolbars, ads and such kept refreshing after a few seconds and jumping to the top of the page. I was interested enough to go to the printer-friendly link an be able to finish the article.

    It's unfortunate that the article and summary talk about "inaccurate GPS" while giving examples of inaccurate or for the most part imprecise databases. It sounded like someone getting lost and blaming the compass when it was the tourist map from the gift shop that was at fault.

    Just checked to make sure, the 8 year old Garmin in my car has the option "avoid unpaved roads" as I don't have a 4x4 I have that option checked. If I wanted to go 4-wheeling I guess I could let it route me on those.

    Idiots who drive for miles in the desert on a gravel road when they are ill-prepared for it are no different than the ones who drive off the pier when their Nav unit was trying to lead them to the ferry. There's always going to be idiots, now they're just ganging up to blame their gadget for their problems.

    1. Re:Only bad tech is the linked page. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Also, whenever I want to go somewhere and plan a route on my phone (or PC, to later transfer it to my phone) I always check the route that the program produced, mainly because it sometimes makes some choices that are OK, but I would like it different, for example - I prefer wider roads, but I would not want to drive 50km more just to avoid a narrow paved road or a small town, also, I would rather drive a bit more and go around a bigger city rather than go trough it, especially if my destination is on the edge of the city. So, I check the route and adjust it if I think I can do better.

    2. Re:Only bad tech is the linked page. by tooslickvan · · Score: 1

      I tried reading the article, the screwed up page with all it's toolbars, ads and such kept refreshing after a few seconds and jumping to the top of the page. I was interested enough to go to the printer-friendly link an be able to finish the article.

      Perhaps the author should include a navigation aid to help you find your content but I hear that they can be unreliable.

    3. Re:Only bad tech is the linked page. by FreeBSD+evangelist · · Score: 1

      I tried reading the article, the screwed up page with all it's toolbars, ads and such kept refreshing after a few seconds and jumping to the top of the page. I was interested enough to go to the printer-friendly link an be able to finish the article.

      "Readability" is your friend.

      No, really. It's one of my favorite and useful toolbar application. It uses a JavaScript program to reformat the page you're viewing, trimming out all the trash.

      https://www.readability.com/bookmarklets/

  31. Natural Selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps this is natural selection at it's best...

  32. It ain't the *GPS*, it's the SOFTWARE and MAPS.... by macraig · · Score: 2

    This is highly misleading. What IS a "GPS"? It's NOT the whole unit, it's JUST the receiver, yet people - even people who should know better - persist in mis-labeling the entire device as a "GPS". What got the people described in this article in life-threatening trouble was NOT the GPS, it was the software and maps, which were of a type completely unsuited to an undeveloped wilderness area.

    Had the ignorant people described in the article had a GPS receiver with the right device, software, and maps, for instance TOPO USA or the outdated Outdoor Navigator, then they likely would have survived and found their destinations in good (or better) health.

  33. Guess I'm just old-school by LordKronos · · Score: 1

    I do lots of traveling, and almost always by car (longest trip was a 3.5 week, 10k mile road trip). I take my GPS with me on every trip, and it almost never even makes it out of its case. I always take a US atlas with me as my primary means of navigation. If I'm going to be doing extensive travel off the main roads, then I also take one of those state atlases that has 100+ pages of maps dedicated to a single state. Otherwise I do a bunch of printouts on google maps of areas I expect to go. When I use the GPS, it's usually just to give me an idea of what sort of services are around. If the next town is 10 miles off the exit, then I might break out the GPS just to see if they have a restaurant listed, or if I'd just be better off waiting for the town 40 miles down the road but right next to the expressway. Only one time have I used a GPS for navigation, and that' because I was on a very confusing group of dirt backroads. I was able to trace my progress for about 20 miles but then there were a few crossroads that weren't on the detailed maps and no signage saying which road was which, so I used the GPS to confirm that I was actually where I thought.

  34. Re:It ain't the *GPS*, it's the SOFTWARE and MAPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true, but you meant what is "a" GPS?

  35. my navigation folly by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 2

    i tried to navigate with my iPad the other day. i entered an address very quickly and easily using the virtual keyboard. it pulled up a beautiful map on the big responsive touchscreen, computed my route faster than a garmin could and told me to start off by turning right at the end of my driveway. perfect, off i went! i knew it was not going to work, but i wanted to see the failure mode anyway. once i got going it kept saying something along the lines of insufficient GPS signal. i though that was funny because it's a wifi-only model that doesn't even have a GPS chip in it.

    1. Re:my navigation folly by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      Probably using wi-fi assisted gps. it had wi-fi at your house so had a coordinate. you leave; it dies off. (pretty sure you were joking and knew this, however :P)

      --
      -SaNo
    2. Re:my navigation folly by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Probably using wi-fi assisted gps.

      I had to read this twice to appreciate the humor-gem embedded within

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:my navigation folly by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I use a wi-fi iPad coupled with a MiFi (which has a GPS built-in). Works decently well (again, I use it for the overview, not the turn-by-turn), but every so often it picks up a hotspot and skews the results (apparently Google Maps trusts it's database more than the raw GPS feed).

    4. Re:my navigation folly by snookums · · Score: 1

      ...a wifi-only model that doesn't even have a GPS chip in it

      This is a serious limitation of the non-3G iPad. The iPhone can do GPS navigation quite happily without a 3G signal if you have an offline mapping application installed. With the hotspot functionality added to the Verizon iPhone (or a MiFi or an Android phone), using a WiFi-only iPad as a truly mobile device, rather than a coffee-table computer, becomes a possibility, but lack of GPS really limits its utility.

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    5. Re:my navigation folly by adolf · · Score: 1

      The iPad doesn't know about the MiFi's GPS, and has no mechanism for using it.

      The MiFi is just a gateway to teh Intarwebs, not a gateway to the GPS constellation.

      There is no "raw GPS feed" in the scenario which you describe.

      FYI.

  36. Navigation before tools by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm doing a skipper course where navigation and calculating water levels are the most stressed topics. I quickly realised that going to sea without training will get you killed pretty soon and very certainly. Same holds for deserts and wilderness in general. Hell, there are cities where you get killed if you wind up in the wrong 'hood.

    The thing is that so many times all will be well with a car, a desert and a some navigation gadget. Taking care of the exceptions is the hard part. Very much like coding.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Navigation before tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to sea and sailed my own boat for two years around the coast of Australia - didn't die, just learnt real fast.

      People just do stupid shit, like drive too fast and drink and drive, and take recreational drugs without knowing their potency or content.

      This is no different...

    2. Re:Navigation before tools by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Hell, there are cities where you get killed if you wind up in the wrong 'hood.

      That'd be an interesting addition to urban GPS maps. "Do not drive through the red areas marked on the map at all. Enter your gang name to display additional safe and unsafe areas for you."

    3. Re:Navigation before tools by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Hell, there are cities where you get killed if you wind up in the wrong 'hood.

      That'd be an interesting addition to urban GPS maps. "Do not drive through the red areas marked on the map at all. Enter your gang name to display additional safe and unsafe areas for you."

      I once actually worked for a car navigator producing company. One problem they had was to navigate around dangerous 'hoods without being called racist.
      On one side they didn't want to offend anyone and on the other side they didn't want to get anyone killed either.
      Don't know how they solved this one.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    4. Re:Navigation before tools by Geminii · · Score: 1

      "Include routes through high-crime areas [ON/OFF]"

      No need to be racist, just tell anyone who asks that the crime statistics come from the city government.

  37. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

  38. The opposite happens too by steveha · · Score: 1

    Sometimes people get really lost and a GPS could have saved them.

    In particular I am thinking of the story of James Kim and his family. In December 2006 they were driving south in Oregon, and they missed their planned exit. It was almost an hour of driving later before they realized they had missed the exit. Not wanting to waste another hour by doubling back, they got off the highway and took a road that looked okay on their map, but was pretty much impassible in winter. (In fact there was supposed to be a gate closing off the road with a sign saying "Closed in Winter".) They ended up stuck, completely outside cellular phone coverage areas, with nobody having any clue where to look for them, and no emergency food or clothes in the car. After a week (a week! no food, only snow for water, two adults and two children, imagine how horrible it must have been!) Mr. Kim made the decision to set out on foot and try to find help. He froze to death, but fortunately a search helicopter spotted the car and the rest of the family was saved.

    I have always figured that a GPS could have prevented this tragedy; with a GPS they wouldn't have missed their exit, and if they did they would have realized it immediately and would have simply gone back and taken the intended exit.

    Now, while I have no desire to say anything disrespectful about Mr. Kim, I do also wonder at their common sense. According to one report I read, they found the road to be difficult going, and they had to stop and get out of the car and move obstacles out of the road (fallen trees? I don't remember the details). Their common sense should have told them that this road was a bad idea, and they should have just turned around and backtracked before it was too late.

    So, common sense could have saved them, or a GPS could have saved them.

    The sad irony is that Mr. Kim was an editor on CNet and he reviewed gadgets like GPS navigators. But he didn't have one in his car.

    P.S. Blindly trusting a GPS is also increasingly leading to trucks trying to go under low bridges, as in this story.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  39. Obligatory xkcd by oracleguy01 · · Score: 1
  40. Why complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...they are willing to trust the GPS to lead them into the middle of nowhere."

    Seems like GPS does exactly what they are trusting it to do...

  41. Some people don't like cracking utilities by apparently · · Score: 1

    Installing pirated maps requires running an executable to patch your GPS. So not only do I have to worry about said executable having a malicious payload that could effect my PC (granted I could run it once in a VM), I have to worry about said executable having a malicious payload that could effect my TomTom. That, and I have to hope that the pirated maps haven't been screwed with by a merry prankster. Other than that, great suggestion!

    1. Re:Some people don't like cracking utilities by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Installing pirated maps requires running an executable to patch your GPS.

      I guess that depends on the GPS design.

      Some have no protection, so updated maps can be used by anybody. Even with maps with some sort of DRM, often it can be removed from the map and again used on any unit. Another method does require you to run a keygen, which could have malware, but a VM would solve that.

      I've never seen a case where you patch the GPS code in any way, though...it's all about removing the DRM from the map, or finding a code so that the GPS unit will be able to decode the DRM.

    2. Re:Some people don't like cracking utilities by apparently · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a case where you patch the GPS code in any way, though...it's all about removing the DRM from the map, or finding a code so that the GPS unit will be able to decode the DRM.

      I was going by the instructions listed for the TomTom, primarily because that's the brand I own, but also because as the article states, TomTom is at least one of the few people who's updating their maps when they're told of these issues. The overview of the steps involved (as listed on that forum) for putting pirated Maps on a TomTom are:

      1 Update the software (navcore) on your TT
      2 Modify the new navcore to accept a new map (patching)
      3 Find a new map, suitable for your TT
      4 Make the new map accepted by your TT system (generate a key)

      "The map you are going to install will not work with the official navcore. For it to work you need to patch (modify) the file 'ttsystem' on your TT. Patching the ttsystem file is easy. Simply run the yDGpatch (made by yDdraigGoch). It allows you to select ttsystem from your TT and do it's magic. It can patch the .dll for the emulator in HOME ("operate my TomTom") too."

      I admit that I can't speak expertly about the ttsystem file, but the nature of crack programs is that you can't really guarantee that they're only touching that one file, and patching a dll for the TomTom pc software could possibly be an issue. Most likely, things are alright as people don't appear to be reporting problems, but then again, there's always people commenting on piratebay torrents about how their AV didn't detect a virus in the crack util, and thus everything's okay.

  42. I Never Fully Trust GPS... by IonOtter · · Score: 2

    Encounter #1: Driving on I-95, going to from New York to Washington DC. Somewhere around the NJ/PA border, the GPS tells me to take the exit off 95. I look at the instructions, and it's telling me to get off the highway, go down a side-street, turn around, then get BACK ON 95 and continue. WTF?! I ignore it and drive past. It goes through it's "recalculating" thing, then tries to tell me to do it again. This continued for about 50 miles until I got far enough away from the alien machine intelligence rays that were telling it to try and kill me by routing me through the worst neighborhoods of Philadelphia and Baltimore.

    Encounter #2: Interstate travel again. I follow it, and it takes me onto a "major highway" that goes through towns, villages and more stoplights than I have ever seen in my entire life. ALL of them red. I check through the settings, and apparently this route is the "shortest distance". I change that to "fastest" and recalculate. Oh, look! I've got to backtrack 4 miles to the turnpike.

    Encounter #3: I wanna avoid Baltimore like the plague, so I route north along the loop to 70, then up to 81. I then take 81 to Binghamton. Straight shot, clear as a bell and lickety-split! The damn GPS keeps trying to route me onto 15 off Frederick, which is a 55 road of money-starved towns with lots of cops. I ignore it and carry on to Hagerstown to pick up 81, but it KEEPS TRYING TO BRING ME BACK TO 15!! I finally gave up and turned it off, since I knew where I was going, I was just using it for mileage tracking and timing. I later learned about "block zones", where you can eliminate areas you don't want the auto-route feature to go.

    It is my opinion that the GPS manufacturers are:

    1. In league with the petro companies, to get you to use up as much fuel as possible.

    2. In league with big pharma, because by the time you get where you're going, you're going to need medication.

    3. In league with the alien machine intelligence, which is thinning the herd of useless bipeds who are too stupid or too stressed out to survive the coming invasion and subsequent processing into energy pods.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by snsh · · Score: 1

      Let me guess - Garmin GPS set to "avoid tolls"?

    2. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by rand200069 · · Score: 1

      Hah...my Garmin does the same thing when I set it to avoid tolls. Damn thing tried taking me 3 hours out of my way to avoid the $8 in tolls. Got that setting turned off pretty quick...

    3. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by jovius · · Score: 1

      Navigation devices are basically good old road maps on steroids. Routes can be planned beforehand and there's no need to check out a map book while driving.

      Mix a GPS device with an idealistic pioneering type and things can go very wrong. People follow their devices like they'd be the guiding hand of God.

    4. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is my opinion that the GPS manufacturers are:

      4) Expecting you to read the manuals thoroughly before relying on a complex computer system.

      Hell, you pretty much spell it out twice, as you explain that you later "discovered" two rather important features of your navigation system. But hey - I'm sure they aren't covered in the manual at all, and are hidden features that you're supposed to pay extra for.

    5. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Turn off the "highway" and "tolls" avoidances. The GPS isn't magic, if you don't RTFM and verify all the settings, its your own fault if it does something silly like this.

    6. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by adolf · · Score: 1

      While all three are operator error, it is obvious (as you state) that it is a conspiracy to cause you emotional distress, feed Big Oil, and try to kill you. Oh, and to keep you from understanding the device that you intend to rely on, Really - it's obvious. [/sarcasm]

      You seem to think these options shouldn't exist, but I, myself, use them quite a bit: Even once, a year ago, to get from the middle of Detroit to my house in NW Ohio, while avoiding highways and using the shortest (not fastest) route, just to see the decrepit remains of that city and do something other than the four-lane shuffle. It was a lovely drive, and far less tiring (though far more time-consuming) than the highway, and we really enjoyed it.

      (And yes, it was dark. And yes, it was in a flashy car with out-of-state plates. And yes, my wife was with me. And yes, we were hungry, but we learned that the urban Detroit we drove through is nothing but local pizza parlors and liquor stores -- conspicuously absent were both national-brand fast food, chicken, or even a proper grocer, and we simply weren't in the mood for the available local cuisine. Scared? Feh. Grow a pair, you pansy -- even in the bad parts of town, people are still just people.)

    7. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Features like "Block Zones" should be useful for avoiding construction or high-traffic areas. You should never have to use a functionality feature to overcome gross programming mistakes.

      It's not a complex computer system. It's a map. It's a map that finds out where you are, where you want to go, and routes you. It's basically A*++. Why should you have to read a manual for that? That's like requiring reading a manual for a microwave oven. If your microwave, or GPS, requires a manual, it's broken crap and you should fix it before trying to sell it.

    8. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by cvdwl · · Score: 1

      Never, use the "shortest distance" option unless you are driving a dirt bike and want an adventure. It will use ANY road that shortens the distance, no matter how crappy that road might be.

      --
      ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
    9. Re:I Never Fully Trust GPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not been on 15 in a while? I take it from Virginia into New York regularly and love it. Fast, scenic, and not full of NAFTA trucks.

  43. In or out of the desolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article implies that people are depending on GPS to get them into desolate spots. Wouldn't it be more correct to say that they are depending on the GPS to get the through or out of these desolate spots?

    Gonna have to go with the old-schoolers on this and say grab a brain, learn to read a map, bring the correct one along and follow it. GPS can show you where it thinks you are but a real map can show you what's around you for miles and miles and if you've been following the map on the way in you'll be able to follow the map on the way out.

    For everyone else, there's some prime retirement real estate on Mars for you to consider. You don't have to work anymore as they've found a virtually unlimited supply of quality fertilizer that they sell back to Earth.

  44. Darwin Awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death by GPS or death by user IQ? Take a look at the 2008 Darwin Awards Winner: http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2008-16.html

  45. How to Mess with OnStar by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if you're up there on those wintery roads and bored out of your mind, try this: Drive your OnStar equipped vehicle to the middle of a large frozen lake. Press the button. Continue driving in straight lines, occasionally stopping to make square left and right hand turns. Talk to the nice lady from India (or Southern California) who has never seen ice in any amount larger than a water pitcher, and tell her you're kind of lost.

    --
    John
    1. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Funny

      Talk to the nice lady from India (or Southern California) who has never seen ice in any amount larger than a water pitcher, and tell her you're kind of lost.

      No need to work that hard, just do what I did. Run out of gas in West Texas, say between Childress and Quanah. Make it on a sunny 100-degree-plus Sunday afternoon in the middle of summer. You, too, can have a conversation with OnStar like I did!

      Me (sheepish): I ran out of gas.
      OnStar: We'll send someone right out.

      Time passes...

      OnStar: Sir, we show you near Childress, Texas, but I don't have any facilities there. What's the nearest larger town?
      Me: This is West Texas, Ma'm. There are no larger towns.

      They ended up sending out the county sheriff with a five-gallon jug of gas.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by pspahn · · Score: 1

      So you rely on OnStar in the same way others rely on GPS? Letting yourself run out of gas in West Texas is kind of a dumb move, but I guess as long as you have that handy button there's nothing to worry about, right?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      West Texas?! Childress is almost in Oklahoma...

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    4. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2

      Hey, I never suggested that running out of gas in the middle of West Texas in the summer (or winter, or fall or spring for that matter) is a Good Thing, even if you've kidnapped the Gasoline Fairy and thrown her in the trunk for the trip. It's definitely up near the top of "The stupidest things RobertB has ever done."

      What OnStar did in that case was rescue me from my stupidity. Which in a strictly Darwinian sense would be bad, I suppose... but from my RobertBinian perspective, not dying of heat stroke and dehydration is indeed a very Good Thing. Chances are, if I never used OnStar again, I'd keep my subscription just because of "that time that they saved my bacon."

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    5. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      West Texas?! Childress is almost in Oklahoma...

      Yeah... too bad I didn't have a GPS. [/rimshot]

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    6. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by Graff · · Score: 1

      So you rely on OnStar in the same way others rely on GPS? Letting yourself run out of gas in West Texas is kind of a dumb move, but I guess as long as you have that handy button there's nothing to worry about, right?

      Gas sensors and gauges have been known to fail, although they are much better than they used to be. I once had a gauge that failed in such a way that it still looked like it worked (it was still moving) but the tank had far less gasoline in it than the gauge showed.

      Fortunately for me it was good weather, I was no more than a half mile from a gas station, and I had an emergency container. If I had been somewhere remote I might have been in serious trouble, this was way before OnStar or other such safety nets.

    7. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by bware · · Score: 1

      You probably could have walked a mile or two along the highway and been at a farmhouse. Most of that country is cotton farms, with a house just about every section.

      I'm surprised someone didn't stop to help, or that you couldn't wave a pickup down. It's not as though it's really deserted around there. If you were really out in West Texas, say out around Marfa, you might be in trouble if you ran out of gas. Marfa might not really qualify as lonesome anymore. Those stretches do run long sections without gas stations or houses though, and it pays to fill up when you can.

    8. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by pspahn · · Score: 1

      You're telling me? My old Dakota had a faulty gauge. Never once did it cause me to run out of gas. That's what the trip odometer is for.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    9. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by Graff · · Score: 1

      My old Dakota had a faulty gauge. Never once did it cause me to run out of gas. That's what the trip odometer is for.

      Yeah, this was when I first started to drive and I hadn't learned that lesson yet. After that I figured out to watch the odometer in addition to the fuel gauge.

      It works pretty well although it's not too accurate if you change your driving habits for some reason. Still, it's a good way to know when you're getting close to needing fuel. I also keep a record of fuel input and miles driven to keep an eye on fuel efficiency, if it changes too much it's a good indicator of when you need to get your car checked out.

    10. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by plover · · Score: 1

      Two farmers met, and were swapping stories. The Texan rancher boasted "My spread is so large that if I hop in my truck it takes me two hours to drive the fence line." The farmer from New Hampshire replied, "Yep, I had a truck like that once, too."

      --
      John
    11. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for me it was good weather, I was no more than a half mile from a gas station, and I had an emergency container.

      You sure know how to ruin a good story.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:How to Mess with OnStar by Graff · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for me it was good weather, I was no more than a half mile from a gas station, and I had an emergency container.

      You sure know how to ruin a good story.

      Yeah it's terrible that I wasn't deep in the desert and facing a horrendous death...

  46. Almost happened to my wife by PPH · · Score: 1

    She entered 'Neiman Marcus' into the GPS. But it directed her to WalMart.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  47. GPS in a dark room? by bornyesterday · · Score: 2, Funny

    You awaken in a poorly lit room, with a closed door on each wall. By your side is a GPS device. You turn it on and ask for directions to go home. It tells you to head east and indicates the proper direction with an arrow. You turn in the direction of the arrow, which adjusts to match your new heading. You open it and enter another room. The door shuts behind you. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue. The GPS continues to point you forward. What do you do?

    1. Re:GPS in a dark room? by DoctorFuji · · Score: 1

      Turn on the backlight to the GPS or hopefully you picked up the lantern in the previous room.

    2. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the GPS as a flashlight

    3. Re:GPS in a dark room? by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue. The GPS continues to point you forward. What do you do?

      Turn up the brightness on the GPS unit and use it as a light source. Duh.

    4. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get ye flask

    5. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light lantern with match

    6. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Kill the slathering grue with your bare hands... oh wait, that was the dragon.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You awaken in a poorly lit room, with a closed door on each wall. By your side is a GPS device. You turn it on and ask for directions to go home. It tells you to head east and indicates the proper direction with an arrow. You turn in the direction of the arrow, which adjusts to match your new heading. You open it and enter another room. The door shuts behind you. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue. The GPS continues to point you forward. What do you do?

      give gps to grue

    8. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lookup...

      A piano falls on you!

    9. Re:GPS in a dark room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What do you do?"

      Purchase a Rand McNally map, or whip out the laptop, pull up the local GIS, download the building's floor plan, and get the hell out of there.

      Or just wake up. Really? A grue? That should have been your first hint. 4 walls each with a door your second. And a GPS by your side, that *works indoors*? Yeah, as if.

      Man, I'd be more scared how it, and I, got there and figured that out before wandering about. I'd probably house myself in a corner, like a squirrel in the dead of winter half frozen, half covered in snow, with a leaf on its head for warmth. A grue. Sheesh.

  48. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people aren't stupid. In fact, I'd consider them smarter than average. They've acknowledged their own lack of information and sought advice from a reputable source. The real idiots are the ones who design the maps with hazardous roads without marking them in such a manner that the GPS knows the dangers. If GPS had proper maps, this wouldn't be a problem. And if you can't trust a map, how the hell are you supposed to navigate unfamiliar territory?

  49. My experience with a GPS by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    The first Christmas after I got my iPhone, the office party was somewhere out of the way, and I checked the iPhone for directions. It's directions would have gotten me there, but I didn't like the route it suggested and tried my own route. It was quicker and simpler than the iPhone route.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  50. Without going into semantics by cyberfin · · Score: 1

    of what their exact name is, if it's the software or hardware, etc., I'm willing to guess that, in historical comparison, before the recent navigation systems became widespread consumer electronics, there was a sudden surge in missing people when the first maps made of paper started being sold in a large commercial manner, together with good ol' magnetic compasses. Hm?

    --
    "I'm taking this loop off." - Jack O'Neill
  51. Hasn't anyone heard of common sense? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Once, when I was trying to find a mountain resort, my GPS tried to send me 20 miles up a country road that ran parallel to the interstate. I turned around and followed the written directions that I always keep with me when going somewhere "difficult."

    Another time, I decided to use my GPS to get to a ski area that I kinda-sorta knew how to get to. The GPS told me to turn onto a road covered in snow. I got back on the highway and went the way that I remembered.

    What told me that my GPS gives bad directions is that once, in San Francisco, it made me drive 20 blocks on a road with a stop sign at every block, when directly parallel to me was Sunset Boulevard, a road where the stoplights are timed so well I can go 20 blocks without stopping!

  52. Stupidity deaths by w0mprat · · Score: 2

    If you are stupid enough put your life in the hands of a single fallible device, you're going to have other problems surviving in the wilderness. Even on a light day walk in a well maintained trail you are one fall or a weather change away form a survival situation, it doesn't take much imagination to work that out, nor prior experience.

    I would suggest the real problem here is that GPS is powerfully enabling to inexperienced people who otherwise would not have undertaken the journey without such directional assitance - perhaps even not been able to find the start of the trail in the first place. The feeling of confidence when you can navigate is dangerous, except it's not in your own orienteering ability, it's in a handheld device that's one drop away from failure.

    There is no substitute to having a freakin clue what do what when the batteries run out.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:Stupidity deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are stupid enough put your life in the hands of a single fallible device, you're going to have other problems surviving in the wilderness.

      Wife:"We're lost. Stop by the nearest gas station."
      Husband:I know what I'm doing. Let's keep going till we see something familiar.

    2. Re:Stupidity deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no substitute to having a freakin clue what do what when the batteries run out.

      Yes there is, spare batteries ;-).

  53. Article is a little unfair.... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article is a little unfair; to be fair it would have to subtract people saved by GPS.

    Frankly, people have always gotten lost, dating right back to at least the time Moses wandered for 40 years in the Sinai. Surely GPS has also gotten people out of trouble. The question is, what's the net effect?

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Article is a little unfair.... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      And, if people educated themselves that GPS is merely a tool, not an authority on what turns you should make, would GPS come out as even more of a life-saver?

    2. Re:Article is a little unfair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moses and the Israelites did not wander for 40 years in the wilderness because they were lost. The distance is not that great. They were prevented from entering the promised land by God because they did not trust God to give them victory over their enemies in Canaan. They took the advice of most of the spies that spied out the land telling them that the land is full of dangerous enemies. God was angry with them for listening to this advice instead of trusting Him and kept them from entering the land. See Deuteronomy 1.

  54. A close call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing this is happening now, that way humans might eliminate the "trust the robots trait" before their inevitable revolution

  55. Not death by GPS by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    It's strategic thinning of targeted segments of the population. I expect the creationist sect to chime in any minute now with something about relying on technology too much. /scorn

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    1. Re:Not death by GPS by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      What? Wouldn't it be the Darwinists who would be encouraging this cleaning of the gene pool?

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    2. Re:Not death by GPS by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      A Darwinist would never rely solely on his GPS as logic is his co pilot. The creationists on the other hand..... Ok sorry I'm not really that mean but I'm on a bit of anti creationist thing lately. Queue the flame wars in 3.2.1

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  56. Planning is essential; Plans are useless. by Onuma · · Score: 1

    -quote from Dwight D. Eisenhower (or "Plans never make it past first contact.")

    At any moment in time, a GPS, compass, map, or vehicle may fail you.
    There is absolutely no substitute for common sense and a little bit of preparedness. Anyone who doesn't look at a map before taking a long road trip on unfamiliar roads is purely idiotic. It's just like checking the weather, checking your tire pressure and wiper blades, and topping off your gas tank. I can make the trip from NY to Houston without a map, but I got misled more than once on my first trip...easy to do with a 21 hour drive - and I had a good road atlas to help me along.

    I'm very thankful to have experienced navigation in every imaginable terrain through multiple means via military training. In some situations, you may even be making the map yourself, on-the-fly.

    Whenever possible, equip yourself with an up-to-date map, a reasonable amount of food and water, a change of clothing (seasonally appropriate, of course) and maintain situational awareness of the terrain, weather, and other people or wildlife around you. A little bit of preparation goes a LONG way in getting you out of a potentially fatal bind.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  57. Using a map/compass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS is pretty nice for figuring out where you are. The direction features seem to be pretty close to useless except for well known destinations.

    I guess I'm pretty old now, but when I was a kid we had to learn how to use a map and a compass. That was only half in jest, because I'm 40, and it doesn't seem that long ago. I never was an expert, but I learned how to read a terrain map, find waypoints, etc.. This was absolute beginner stuff. The thing to get over is this idea that finding your way without road signs is easy. One time in Georgia I stopped by a roadside park just to get a few pictures. I hiked less than a mile into the woods and was stupid enough not to pay attention. It took me another four hours to find my way back to my car.

    I think we have lost our sense of direction (in the literal sense). A few years back I know that I could walk a few miles and then know almost intuitively how to find my way back. I read stories about aborigines thinking in terms of compass directions rather than left/right. When they recall directions, it's not "Turn left, turn right" but an intuitive grasp of which direction they were facing. They can enter a windowless room and still know where they are in relation to the sun. That's an amazing ability that many don't have.

  58. Obligatory by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2

    Darwin approves.

    Also, did it really take this long?

    http://xkcd.com/461/

    Also,

    http://xkcd.com/201/
    http://xkcd.com/407/
    http://xkcd.com/783/

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  59. GPS is also easily jammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that worries me when I use my GPS while hunting is GPS jamming. It is relatively easy to jam a GPS signal, and there have been cases of unintentional jamming.

    For me, I note the compass direction to the nearest road several times during the day. If someone fired up a GPS jammer in the Pennsylvania woods during hunting season, I'm sure there would be several people never making it out of the woods again..

  60. Roads in other countries. by einstein4pres · · Score: 2

    Not that this story needs more anecdotal posts, but I was walking around in the Czech Republic wandering around small towns. My wife and I decided to check where we were on our GPS-enabled Nokia N810. Lo and behold, we were on a marked "road" that was no more than a wide footpath through trees. We weren't certain that an ancient cart would fit down the path.

    1. Re:Roads in other countries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and the "shortest route" will likely try to pull you through the middle of the forest, saving you 0.001% distance and -30% time. One wonders who made the maps, as paper maps of the same area actually show road type, width, restrictions and everything. As for me, I'm betting on "a guy in a basement, looking at Google Maps' aerial photos".

  61. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Well I'd be with you, without question. The only problem is, people seem to get upset when you consider this as a viable option. I regularly get called out by the local police, to go and 'recover' idiots on my snow mobile(along with 3 other folks around here) until they can find someone to pull their car out which is stuck 2-8mi down a 'summer only' concession. Never mind the large signs that say NO PLOWING FROM NOV TO MARCH, with a 2ft plowed in drift at the front of the road. Then again I'm always surprised at how people will go around the 2ft drift, and through the ditch to get on these roads.

    I might actually break my old record of 40 trips out this year. And yes, the services(police) around here have snow mobiles, but these people are low-rung on the totem pole, and the police are more likely to ask locals who know the area better to get them out, unless it's really serious(then they might fly in a helicopter). In the end if it's not to that, I just go pick up someone from the triage team from the local ski club.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  62. Re:It ain't the *GPS*, it's the SOFTWARE and MAPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like people who call their computer, the entire computer, the CPU.

  63. Progress by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 1

    These same people would have been dying taking those secondary roads over the mountain pass in their Thomas Guides. All this article shows is the steady hand of progress - turns out there are still stupid people out there.

    1. Re:Progress by puddles · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Black Bear Pass in Telluride will kill you just as easily if you're inexperienced. Paper map or GPS matters not.

  64. Over-hyped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA: Over the past 15 years, at least a dozen people have died in Death Valley from heat-related illnesses, and many others have come close. Another hiker vanished last June in Joshua Tree National Park. His body has not yet been found.
    ~12 people over 15 years? With over 200,000 visitors per year?

    Seems like they're making a big deal about nothing.
    Hell, you're more likely to get killed by lightening strike.

  65. GPS is not the problem by puddles · · Score: 1

    I use GPS and paper maps (Delorme) when I go in to Death Valley. GPS is not the problem. Uninformed, inexperienced, and unprepared drivers are the problem. Death Valley is unforgiving if you make too many mistakes.

  66. Have you tried reporting map errors before? by snsh · · Score: 1

    Have any of you ever tried informing Google/Navteq/Teleatlas of map errors? It's like communicating with a black hole.

    At one point every map provider had a POI for city hall (of a major US city) pointed at a nearby Starbucks, along with a long-gone road that had been redeveloped 40 years ago and is now covered with buildings. I filled out error reports every few month along with a link to photos and satellite imagery. It took between one and two-and-a-half years for them all to get updated. At one point I had email correspondence with a real person who said they would need to send someone out to check it out.

    I don't get what the problem is. Is it really so labor intensive for map providers to fix their maps? Or do they just have sucky processes for collecting map feedback?

    1. Re:Have you tried reporting map errors before? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I used to work for the company that goes by the name NavTeq now.

      The process is now actually driving each road segment. So, if there is an error reported what has to happen is a vehicle has to be scheduled to physically go there and drive on that road. This may not have been done for a while - there are not thousands of collection vehicles. I don't believe there were even high tens when I worked there. It is enormously expensive to do this, so it is just going to get scheduled.

      How long? A year? Maybe. I would not expect anything quick.

      Garmin is one of the most proactive companies out there - they change the data from NavTeq around a great deal. However, they just pass reported errors back to NavTeq. Fixing the data up so it can be displayed is tough - it takes most of the companies something like a year to build a new release. Garmin manages to publish updates four times a year. But even with that, they evidently have to rely on NavTeq for the geometry and do not try to adjust that - probably a good thing.

      The one issue I have with Garmin of late is the speed limit data on roads. For the most part it is pretty accurate but it is one of those things that 95% accuracy means it is wrong 1 out of 20 times you look at the display.

      Oh, and from what I have seen nobody else comes close to what Garmin does so there is no need to bother with any of the others. Magellen is good for humor, but nobody is looking for humor on the road.

    2. Re:Have you tried reporting map errors before? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've communicated with Google regarding map errors. The mechanism for doing so was obvious at the time, though I don't recall it now.

      Generally speaking, they responded in a timely fashion, and applied my suggested changes in the next update.

      I did basically the same as you: A basic reasoning as to how their maps/directions were wrong, and appropriate links to their own satellite/streetview imagery along with an explanation to illustrate how it really works.

      From spelling errors to poorly-formed intersection routing, they've done OK. Not great, mind you, and in one case near my own house they've taken my own advice quite backwards, but Google has been far more responsive than a black hole.

      I've not tried to correct other mapping companies, since regular updates to my Garmin Nuvi seem to forestall my complaints before they're worth complaining about, and between them and Google they are only two maps that I use frequently.

  67. It gets a little more complicated by puddles · · Score: 1

    We usually carry 5 extra gallons of gas when going into Death Valley. In calculating how much gas you need to cover your trip, you also need to factor in the lower tire pressure you're going to be running (if you're going to go over rocky terrains and washboard roads) --- that takes more gas than normal.

  68. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    No I just don't have a high tolerance for dumb.

    But if you talk like that in person you're probably one of those really annoying moms who thinks everything is good, sunshine and unicorns.

  69. I thought I was so smart... by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    I was going to rush in here and post something about Darwinism at work, only to find that like 4 of the first 5 posts were all Darwin related. I guess everyone else is exactly as unoriginal as I am.

  70. I've been seeing this for decades now-Gangland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big part of the problem is that people are simply ignorant. If you didn't grow up in an area or haven't lived there for a long time it can be hard to appreciate the risks. And most people grow up in urban or suburban areas that effectively have no (natural) risks at all.

    Are there any maps showing the bad neighborhoods?

    1. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now-Gangland. by khr · · Score: 1

      Are there any maps showing the bad neighborhoods?

      Boy, I could use that... I only recently moved to Brooklyn, NY (previous places I lived: Waldport Oregon, Portland Oregon, Pune India...) and I don't know where the borders of some of the neighborhoods are. I work in Crown Heights and I know that's a bad one (two murders in December on the very block where my office is located!) but where does it end and Bed-Stuy begin? That'd be worse...

      At least Manhattan is pretty safe for almost all of it except the far north...

    2. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now-Gangland. by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, almost all neighbourhoods are safe to drive through if you don't mind running over the guys who jump out into the road wielding baseball bats.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    3. Re:I've been seeing this for decades now-Gangland. by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, almost all neighbourhoods are safe to drive through if you don't mind running over the guys who jump out into the road wielding baseball bats.

      Personally, I don't mind a bit. However, OTHER people mind, for some reason, especially the police.

      It's quite troublesome.

  71. Perhaps the fucker by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    that stole my Garmin Nuvi is hopelessly lost somewhere as I write this...

    --
    Nullius in verba
  72. It's the maps by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    As others have alluded, it's not the GPS, it's the maps. Any map can be wrong. A printed map can be wrong just as easily as an electronic map in a GPS unit can be wrong. Part of the problem might be that the view of your route is generally much narrower in the GPS, and it's more difficult to see that the route you're taking leads to a whole bunch of nothing in the middle of nowhere. If I'm going into an unknown area, I often zoom out the map just to make sure the road eventually connects somewhere. And even that isn't a perfect indication.

    Also, just like paper maps, electronic maps get OLD. If you have a unit that gets maps off a DVD or internal storage, the information can get stale. If it doesn't update over the air, find out how to keep it current.

    Now, GPS making nonoptimal decisions, like leading you off the freeway and right back on again (shortest route) or directing you to a 35mph "highway" that goes through a bunch of small towns instead of using the freeway, that's the GPS unit not the maps. Some of these problems can be fixed by changing the setup defaults, which most non-geeks aren't inclined to do. But this isn't really a map issue.

    After a couple early incidents (gps trying to make me turn left on a one-way going right, or heading me up a road that clearly had been closed for years) I began using the GPS directions as advisory only. What I tell new GPS users is not to panic if you miss a turn or not sure it's giving you the right directions. All GPS units will recalculate if you miss a turn. Sometimes this means "I just didn't want to turn there". GPS is advisory only , just as if your spousal unit was in the passenger seat with a map and a compass.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:It's the maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS is advisory only , just as if your spousal unit was in the passenger seat with a map and a compass.

      It's like any technology, once you use it long enough you'll learn the wisdom of following directions.

    2. Re:It's the maps by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      GPS is advisory only , just as if your spousal unit was in the passenger seat with a map and a compass.

      Though the GPS will give you considerably less grief if you ignore its instructions :)

      (This is one of the more annoying things about Garmins: the way they say "recalculating" every time you fail to follow instructions. At least TomTom have the grace to make their units just Shut Up And Do It in those circumstances)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  73. ha by memnock · · Score: 1

    Gadget folks who are too scared go outside unless they had a toy to show them where to go dying because of their gadgets?

    I've been lost in the woods without a map or compass. fortunately, it wasn't a very big, @37k acres. But I'm somewhat accustomed to wandering in natural areas. I take my risks with some knowledge of what they entail.

    I've been turned around even when i had a Trimble. when I follow the Trimble explicitly, I'm not conscious of my path and surroundings, so take away the Trimble and I don't know how I got there or how to get back until I've wandered for a while. A GPS is fun at times, but one should already be familiar with what it's like being in remote areas and carrying a compass & map.

    If you were too scared to venture out before without the assistance, perhaps you should have not bought that gadget and started walking or driving.

  74. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

    Calling you an asshole is not at all a pollyanna response.
    Adding some misogyny on top of your general misanthropy isn't doing your social skills any favors, either.

  75. Its Not Always Obvious by rally2xs · · Score: 2

    Just about happened to a couple of us that were following the GPS route thru Death Valley. We believed the gadget when it said to go in a certain direction that was not the main road. 40 miles later, the next turn put us on a road paved with fairly large, sharp rocks. The sign said, "Next services 70 miles." Well, we had an AWD SUV, but that road looked seriously challenging, and although we filled up at the last opportunity, there wasn't enough gas to go 69 miles down that road, find a bridge out, come 110 miles back to the main road, and then coutinue on the main road to California. We turned around, even tho the road we were on before the unpaved road was shown to join up with the main road. That was a good decision, too, as we found out later that it didn't go "thru" either.

    That was close...

  76. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    "Annoying mom" seems to still fit the bill.

  77. Spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder, if you calculate search and rescue costs, insurance payouts, and the value of the maybe a life every couple years, would it make sense to put a Spot emergency transmitter in rental cars in the area.

    Put a big red tag on it, saying if you activate it, you get billed $500.

    If I'm lost and getting dehydrated, no hesitation, I'd spend a few hundred dollars to call in the cavalry.

  78. special information about the routes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or close enough. Not long ago I had a trucker come to my door, out of breath, having stuck his tractor at the bottom of the hill I live near the top of, being brought this way by MapQuest and GPS. Nothing special you say...well, evidently those services thought a 1 lane gravel road going straight up a mountain (in SW VA), complete with cliffs, deep ditches, and short radius turns was a perfectly fine route to send this dupe on.

    That's because most GPS units have general knowledge about routes. There are actually specialty navigation services (e.g., Maptuit) that deal with the transportation industry.

    So, for example, they may know about special zoning provisions. It may be that a particular Walmart only got zoning approval to open a store on the condition that their supply/supplier's trucks only use a certain route (e.g., doesn't go by the local school). A Garmin will not have that data, but a service provided by Maptuit (amongst others) does have that data. Other things like low overpasses as well weight-restricted bridges are other key pieces of information that would be useful.

    It takes time and resources to collect this data, and since Garmin and Navteq wants to keep costs down, they don't bother with it. If you're a (semi-responsible) transportation company it's probably useful to you, so you'd be willing to pay a premium.

  79. Not entirely stupid peoples fault. by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons I rely on proper paper maps when in the wilderness is because they have significantly less errors and include a lot of information the digital databases don't. I've also been concerned for many years the way many maps in GPS units, and online map tools don't give you any information about the type of road (paved, unpaved, 4WD only etc) which proper topographic maps do. You can't even tell how steep the road is due to the lack of proper topographic information.

    This is very poor on the part of the companies making these products. There is no excuse for stupidity but there is also no excuse for not anticipating the stupidity of people who might be mislead by bad information from your product and kill themselves with it. Seriously, how could the possible condition of the road and the type of vehicle it being used with be completely forgotten when developing these products? Quite simply too many GPS devices have map data that is just not as good as a real map, and seems to lack any consideration of safety when providing instructions to users. Combine this neglegence with standard widespread and potentially fatal stupidity and it's a perfect storm.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:Not entirely stupid peoples fault. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A) You can get GPS units with that type of information but they are extremely expensive
      B) a vast majority of users don't need it.
      C) when looking at a place that is unsafe, don't go there. Most GPS will reroute.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. So, how many competent navigators are out there? by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Sure, any competent navigator knows how/when to use GPS. The problem is with all of the other incompetent navigators that rely on the GPS to navigate for them.

  81. Exactly - didn't the dude have a dispatcher? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    My buddy used to drive for JB Hunt, and they damn sure told him which way he was going to drive (presumably based on one of these premium nav services). I'm kinda surprised that this guy was freelancing it.

  82. Death by STUPIDITY, not GPS by eepok · · Score: 2

    Don't blame GPS. It's a system utilized by a device to show you where things likely are. If people die in blindly following GPS, that's on the user. That's a single point of failure in their survival plan that made for themselves.

    Tip: If you're going out into the wild with a GPS device, also bring along a compass, a map of the area (topographical), and let people know when you're leaving and when you'll be back. Also tell them if you're not back by X date, call the authorities.

      Hope for the best, but plan for the worst, people.

  83. I've got a similar story by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I was trying to get to a buddy's house and he had provided an address... cheerfully typed it into Google Maps on the iPhone and away I go. Get somewhat near the destination, and the application starts telling me to turn right... while I'm on an overpass. I later found out that his address was unknown to Google Maps and you had to use Mapquest to find it!

  84. Offline maps. by FreeBSD+evangelist · · Score: 1

    Some can do that. The Motion-X GPS app for the iPhone, for example, will allow you to store maps in your phone, so you can still navigate in areas without cellular data service.

    But if you RTFA, the problem isn't online vs offline access to maps. It's that the maps are inaccurate.

    1. Re:Offline maps. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Of course "some can do that" - is it so hard to grasp why I wrote "some solutions" (other, those which can't... but are poised to become extremely popular), or what "related" could mean, in relation to grandparent poster, TFS and TFA?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  85. Yes, obviously all of that is a capital crime by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Surely misreading a map means that you deserve to die, and your family to suffer horribly, right?

    I concur with the GP: you're an ass.

    1. Re:Yes, obviously all of that is a capital crime by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Maybe when you decide to walk 4 miles to the next town and get found 15 miles away dead (now, 4 miles, then double back and walk the other 4 miles back, that makes 8 miles, back to family and blankets and warmth) you can comment about how bright you are.

  86. Technically by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not GPS, is the routing software messing up usually due to lack of data (or out of date) as opposed to logical fault. I am pretty sure the satellites had very little to do with it other than say "Your Here!" over and over again.

    Of course I remember when GPS was a "big deal" and specialized, I remember taking a course in it, and having to provide training to others. When units cost thousands of dollars. Of course I am in GIS and understand all the background. Heck there was a time when the US Army would mess with your accuracy just for fun, and you had to try to correct for it!

    Now any smuck can go to bestbuy and pick up something for 150$ and it tells you where to go.

    You're supposed to use a tool, not let the tool use you.

    1. Re:Technically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not accounting for how many people ARE tools.

  87. I always bring water when travelling in the desert by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

    I live in Arizona, and always bring a map and put some water in the back of my truck before traveling in an unfamiliar route in the desert or the mountains. I do that even if I am not planning to go 4-wheeling on dirt roads. I usually put one or two plastic 5-gallon water cans in the back, just in case. During the winter, up in the mountains here, I keep gloves, a jacket, and other warm clothing behind the seat. That way, if I break down or get stuck, I can still survive.

    People who try to use their GPS to find where I live, have complained that my address is not in their GPS. One GPS that did have my address, was off by about 1/4 of a mile.

    Last time I checked, a couple of well known on-line mapping websites were off by over a mile, for where I live. They both indicate that my address is among the cattails in the marshy area at the end of a small lake, next to the garbage transfer station and near the city sewage treatment plant. I would hate to see anyone actually try to drive into that marshy area.

    About 12 years ago, I bought a newly published book about ghost towns directly in person from the author. The author neglected to mention that the maps and photos in his new book were over 30 years old. I took off into the mountains, in my 4 wheel drive truck, looking for several ghost towns. I was puzzled that the maps in his book did not mention forest road numbers.

    The route to one ghost town was described as being a little rough. That was really understating things, I was carefully continuously crawling over rocks in low range, until I finally gave up and turned around. I later noticed that his maps were so old and out of date, that there were no Interstate freeways shown, because they did not exist back then. Local old timers, later told me that most of the buildings in his photos had been torn down, for safety reasons, back in the 1970s.

  88. Almost Death by GPS by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    A few years ago there was a man who was told to turn right... at a railroad crossing. He dutifully did and the car got stuck on the railroad tracks. Shortly thereafter a commuter train made short work of his vehicle (he had safely gotten out). The line is electrified with third rail (the kind that does not have wooden protection boards) so he is pretty lucky to have not hit the damn thing when exiting the car or even with the car itself.

  89. Natural Selection is a good thing... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For years we have wondered what will happen if machines make life too easy for people will be all end up like idiocracy????

    Well this is a perfect example of a Selection Pressure that is re-emerging, we should not try to "Fix it".

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  90. You don't need GPS, map or compass ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    You don't need GPS, map or compass when a helicopter drops you on the high ground and you only need to figure out which way is down hill. ;-)

  91. Yes people are dumb but... by brillow · · Score: 1

    GPS is marketed as a consumer device which will get you where you need to go. A good GPS will not lead you down a road you cannot pass. GPS mapmakers should quit using maps which include closed, impassible roads. Also, if a road is closed, it needs to have its entrances blocked or signage indicating how rough it is and what kind of vehicle is needed to traverse it. I've also wondered, since I read the story about the CNET editor and his family who got stranded similarly and died. What would the cost be to install minimum-capability 911/sms-only cell towers in remote areas? If they have deaths every year in death valley, which could be alleviated by some very low-capability wireless infrastructure, then why not do it? How much would it cost?

    1. Re:Yes people are dumb but... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      And then what? Start up a sort of internal coast guard to constantly rescue people from remote areas?

      Here's an idea. You're responsible for yourself. If you go hiking into the middle of nowhere and get lost without any preparation, skill, or foresight, you'll probably die.

      Stop trying to save people from themselves by taking ever larger chunks of my paycheck. I would like to be able to work for myself someday and people like you are bound and determined to make sure I stay someone's slave.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Yes people are dumb but... by brillow · · Score: 1

      I don't think rescuing the handful of people who die yearly due to this is going to cause your taxes to go up much. Also, sometimes even smart prepared people get hurt and die int he wilderness. I don't think that when this happens to you or someone you love you will say "Oh well its good they died." But if you think people who get stuck in bad situations and the children or grandmas they have with them deserve death, then thats your lot. Enjoy society.

  92. GPS horror stories by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    I've got a few stupid GPS stories.
    Like the time it told me to turn right and send me on a 3 mile U turn right back to the place where I turned right to cross the street I had been on.
    I could have just made a LEFT turn and saved 3 miles!

    Or the countless times the destination was on the RIGHT according to the GPS. After not finding it and back tracking, we found it ON THE LEFT!

    I wonder if anybody has sued the GPS makers for defective software that led them astray and into potential danger.

    1. Re:GPS horror stories by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The destination is typically the address destination, and many company will be on a large lt, or several small one and not build the front in accordanse to where the address location is. Not that they should.

      And yes, sometimes lots on the opposite side of a street. They East side lot might be the primary address, but they built the building on the West side*.

      The GPS was accurate as per the zoning.

      *West side in da houze

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  93. Darwin Award by truk138 · · Score: 0

    Goes to show that people will always die in dumb avoidable ways

  94. this has nothing to do with GPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is going to give the GPS system a bad rap, but it's not the fault of the GPS (Global Positioning System). When is the GPS ever off enough to cause someone to do something horribly stupid?

    What is at fault here is the software utilizing GPS! If you were going by coordinates, and the coordinates were off...then sure. But this isn't that at all; it's the mapping software giving incorrect directions. And people blindly following.

    This is like blaming Intel for Microsoft's bugs. (granted..sometimes it might be intel's issue.)

  95. Stay "Left" then stay "Right" by tekrat · · Score: 1

    This little saying from my GPS has almost gotten me into accidents along the Garden State more times than I can remember...

    What it's really saying is that I should stay center because the road is about to split into "Express" and "Local" and I need to be on the local, but, after I follow it's directions to stay left, I'm headed for the express, with NO WAY to get off the Garden State from that point on for many, many miles.

    It makes me want to throw the damn thing out the window and just look at a paper map. All hail analog!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  96. Re:Kill It Before It Dies by dwillden · · Score: 1

    Because of the money it costs to search for them and extract them and their vehicles from where they get stuck when we do find them in time.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  97. correction: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    more and more people are dying in deserts and wildernesses because they rely on their GPS units

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  98. Never trust a Gremlin by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    My first experience with a Garmin had it trying to make us go down the wrong way on one way streets.

  99. Darwin Awards by Iceman4234 · · Score: 1

    I don't have any problems with this....
    http://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2010.html

  100. Don't leave home without it by vk2sky · · Score: 1

    If you're going off the beaten track, then I have but one word (okay, acronym): EPIRB. As well as adequate, food, water, and fuel supplies, of course. And, if possible, tell someone at your destination when to expect you, so they can raise the alarm when you don't turn up.

  101. Darwin Awardees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One reason the stupidity level of the world is rising is that we don't let enough idiots kill themselves off.... hopefuylly before they procreate.

  102. Re:It ain't the *GPS*, it's the SOFTWARE and MAPS. by macraig · · Score: 1

    *facepalm*

  103. Trek by KDingo · · Score: 1

    I've never trusted GPS, and I never will... I could never forgive it... for the death of my boy.

  104. thats not a knife. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what I did for my last holiday. Went to USA, hired a car, bought a GPS, went through all the backroads from Yosomitte to death vally to the grand canyon and all over Arizona & nevada.
      I've been to what the yanks call "the middle of nowhere" and while I can see why many people could get killed out there, If your from Australia and used to what WE call "the middle of nowhere" you are already sooooo over prepared it's not funny. A GPS and a few litres of water is quite sufficient for many travellers coming from down under.

  105. It's not the GPS unit's fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you travel in areas with no cell phone reception and very little traffic all sorts of small problems can be fatal. Running out of gas, engine failure, transmission failure, 2 flat tires, getting stuck in the mud or snow. There are a multitude of things that can incapacitate you or your transportation and you need to be prepared for them. Letting people know where you are going and when to expect you is important as is having a cache of food, water and blankets in the vehicle to tide you over until help arrives.

  106. Very Sad by GeoSanDiego · · Score: 1

    Very very sad story. I am wondering if the woman had tried opening the radiator to obtain water for her and her son to drink.

    1. Re:Very Sad by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      Please no one try this. Anti-freeze is in most radiators in the US and will taste sweet, but kill you easily.

      - Toast

  107. Bears Buy GPS Jammers by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hungry bears are buying GPS jammers and quietly laughing.

  108. My thought exactly... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    Think of it as Evolution in action.

    If you're willing to follow something blindly to your death, the world is better off without you.

      Note this also applies to politics and religion, at least; probably many more things as well...

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  109. Please let's at least give 'em a hint. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Come on, folks, you're traveling between Portland OR and Las Vegas NV, and your GPS says the most direct route is over some gravel Forest Service road in the Eastern Oregon mountains... In the winter... You take it? Really? And then you: - Remove something like four roadblocks placed there to indicate the road is closed (except to locals with local knowledge). - Go up a ways in the snow, decide to back out, and go out by a DIFFERENT route. - When you get stuck, burn your tires to make a smoke signal WITHOUT waiting for the snowstorm to end and cloud cover to clear so it will be visible. (And with all this wet burns-smoky wood around, too...) - Then leave the car to hike out for help, rather than sticking around for the air search to find you. But what's really stupid is when the CLEO in charge of the search gets on the media and says that "he did all the right things" to salve the feelings of the Darwin Award winner's loved ones - and drive the Mountain Rescue volunteers ballistic because he's just told several million news watchers to do THE SAME STUPID STUFF. There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves. But you CAN at least MENTION to them that GPS databases show: - every historic abandoned logging road and ghost town known to the USGS (whose maps and databases they used as their major input), - every closed-all-winter road and only-occupied-seasonally resort town ditto, and - a few fake towns and roads that are deliberately inserted - in out-of-the-way places - to detect copyright violators. With those in the database the poor program is going to include them in the route finding. So somebody in a Prius looking for a way to the Bodie state park may be driected to the 4-wheel-drive-only road to save a few miles (as happened to a friend). Or somebody looking for a way over a mountain might end up on the closed-by-snow-until-summer-meltoff road to the summer-only resort town, rather than the interstate road a few miles over. Or somebody running low on gas in a desert may take a back road to a copyright-protection fake town or a mining town that's been "ghost" for a century. It's unreasonable to expect everybody who bought a "maps and navigation" product to figure this out in advance. This is especially true for city dwellers whose experience with surviving in hostile environments is limited to cable/satellite TV shows. News stories like this one get the word out that GPS system use produces a "kill you" mode that is not intuitively obvious. If they kill themselves by trusting a GPS AFTER seeing/hearing about a few of these, THEN it's a much clearer case of "evolution in action".

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  110. Please at least give 'em a hint. (I HATE /. v3) by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Come on, folks, you're traveling between Portland OR and Las Vegas NV, and your GPS says the most direct route is over some gravel Forest Service road in the Eastern Oregon mountains... In the winter... You take it? Really?

    And then you:
      - Remove something like four roadblocks placed there to indicate the road is closed (except to locals with local knowledge).
      - Go up a ways in the snow, decide to back out, and go out by a DIFFERENT route.
      - When you get stuck, burn your tires to make a smoke signal WITHOUT waiting for the snowstorm to end and cloud cover to clear so it will be visible. (And with all this wet burns-smoky wood around, too...)
      - Then leave the car to hike out for help, rather than sticking around for the air search to find you.

    But what's really stupid is when the CLEO in charge of the search gets on the media and says that "he did all the right things" to salve the feelings of the Darwin Award winner's loved ones - and drive the Mountain Rescue volunteers ballistic because he's just told several million news watchers to do THE SAME STUPID STUFF.

    There's not much you can do about MORONS, one way or another, they may kill themselves.

    But you CAN at least MENTION to them that GPS databases show:
      - every historic abandoned logging road and ghost town known to the USGS (whose maps and databases they used as their major input),
      - every closed-all-winter road and only-occupied-seasonally resort town ditto, and
      - a few fake towns and roads that are deliberately inserted - in out-of-the-way places - to detect copyright violators.

    With those in the database the poor program is going to include them in the route finding. So somebody in a Prius looking for a way to the Bodie state park may be driected to the 4-wheel-drive-only road to save a few miles (as happened to a friend). Or somebody looking for a way over a mountain might end up on the closed-by-snow-until-summer-meltoff road to the summer-only resort town, rather than the interstate road a few miles over. Or somebody running low on gas in a desert may take a back road to a copyright-protection fake town or a mining town that's been "ghost" for a century.

    It's unreasonable to expect everybody who bought a "maps and navigation" product to figure this out in advance. This is especially true for city dwellers whose experience with surviving in hostile environments is limited to cable/satellite TV shows. News stories like this one get the word out that GPS system use produces a "kill you" mode that is not intuitively obvious.

    If they kill themselves by trusting a GPS AFTER seeing/hearing about a few of these, THEN it's a much clearer case of "evolution in action".

    PS: The italic tag is broken with the new version of slashcode.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  111. Death by GPS by Nyder · · Score: 2

    Now that's a reality show I could enjoy.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  112. The problem isn't that people trust their GPS by LowG1974 · · Score: 1

    It's that people blindly trust their GPS. How dumb do you have to be to drive more than 1/2-a-gas-tank's distance into the middle of nowhere, uphill, in a snowstorm, on a one-lane gravel road before you say "hmm... maybe this is not the best way..."

    --
    there is no spoon. or fork. there is a butter knife, and it's dull.
  113. For the love... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

    It's Death fucking Valley.

    It's wasn't named that in a hipster ironic way. Death Valley will KILL you.

    It's not the GPS, it's people being so sheltered from Rural life that they forget that we couldn't survive outside without modern conveniences.

    If you had to go out and forage for food, could you?

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  114. Colorado, the Rockies and GPS by inthealpine · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine and myself went to Colorado a few years back and rented a Jeep which came with a GPS. About half way into the trip we decided to drive around the inner foothills which was a blast. We decided to turn on the GPS to find our way back into Denver and what seemed like a reasonable road turned into a dirt road, then a off road path, finally a goat path. The GPS had a reading of a fork or turn ahead soon so we knew we were going to be in the clear soon. One of the best metal images of my life was driving on the side of this mountain with a solid wall of rock to my left, not enough road for my tires on the narrow path because on the right side it dropped down 1000 ft or more (so I was literally driving half on the wall of the mountain). I look at my friend in the passenger seat and because of the extreme angle we are at I can nearly see down the shear cliff to my right and that British bitch chimes in at that very moment "Turn right, now". My friend and I look at each other, he looks out his window practically hanging over the cliff smiles and says he didn't think he would appreciate me making that turn right now. We did make it off that goat path finally, but we did complain to Enterprise about their GPS who frequently suggested we drive ourselves off multiple mountain sides that trip.

    Oddly enough the house I bought last year which is not in CO and very much in town doesn't show up correctly on any GPS. Perhaps this is a curse. Although when I go to sell this house I want to sell it as a grow house and get some good money for it. Cops not being able to find my house could pay some dividends.

    --
    "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
  115. His primary bad decision was moving by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

    I remember when I was in Boy Scouts, our leader told us to ignore any advice you might have heard about finding your way back to civilization if you are lost. If somebody, somewhere, has some remote clue as to where you might be (and thinks to have someone search), you are 100% better off not going anywhere. You probably are not as lost as you think, and are likely not far from where you were trying to be. The best way for somebody to find you is for you not to go even farther away.

    Yes, by moving you may, by dumb luck, blunder back to where you need to be, but you are far more likely to simply end up getting more lost and hard to find.

    And never, ever, abandon your car if you are lost. It contains all sorts of useful resources and is rather larger (and easier to find) than you wandering about the woods alone, passed out under a tree. It contains a conveniently large tank of liquid firestarter, and if you carry a couple of basic tools, a large amount of nice insulation in the form of your seat cushions and carpeting. In the heat, the underside is perfectly good shade (if a little cramped.)

    1. Re:His primary bad decision was moving by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      If you're lost in your car, just set it on fire. The resulting pall of thick black smoke should alert rescuers to your plight, and they're hardly going to blame you for burning down a forest.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  116. What ever happened to just reading maps? I don't know what the US equivalent is, but in Melbourne we have the Melways. Basically, it's a road map of pretty much the whole state. It is updated every year, so it's almost always accurate. Sure, it might actually require using your brain a little (that sounds pretty scary) to figure out the best route but I don't think It has ever lead me the wrong direction or sent me into a desert. Why is that idea so hard for people to grasp? Just read the god-damn map, and as long as you aren't an idiot about it, you will get to your destination. Bam, problem solved. No more driving through narrow unsealed roads or into rivers. When did people stop thinking for themselves?

  117. It is not just bad maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is what happened to me a few days ago.

    I got off the freeway, turned left at the next light instead of going stright (to fill gas). My home is a mile from the intersection where I turned left. The GPS tells me to continue for 1/2 mile on the road I turned into, take the next ramp to another freeway (which intersects the freeway I got off from) instead of telling me to make U turn (there is one within 1/4 mile) come back to the same intersection and make a left to get back to the street I should have originally gone.

    Had I been new to the place I would have had no option but follow the GPS.

    The route given by GPS is "faster" (50MPH) but has more lights before and after the freeway part and definetly longer than mile comapred to the stright route (35MPH) of exactly a mile with fewer lights.

    What is more interesting is that the very same GPS had never told me to turn left at that intersection and take the next freeway whenever I approach it. It made that bad decision just because I turned left.

    There are more bad route selection algorithms at play than you would think.

    The options you pick (fast, short distance etc, which apply different weights to alternate routes) also play a role in making a bad route into a worse one.

    Which is why I say it is naive to say that one who follows a GPS is dumb in significant number of cases.

  118. don't trust your gas gauge either by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    And don't be too hard on yourself. It's easier to run out of gas in west Texas than you might think. You know to gas up before trying to cross a desert, but east of Lubbock is not a desert and has some towns, so you think there'll be gas and it puts you off your guard. The towns don't all have gas stations. And those stations that are open on Sunday (let alone 24/7) are even fewer. Heck of a time to find out that your gas gauge is even less accurate than you suspected.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  119. Maps and Routing by zeroeth · · Score: 1

    It's been stated already, GPS is just where you are. Its road metadata and routing that gets you. I'd like to point out the wiki style road map system Open Street Maps http://www.openstreetmap.org/ Easy to upload your own tracks and create roads out of them. The OSM wiki has lots of information on apps that utilize the data, I even used it on an old Nokia Series60 phone. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Map_On_Garmin is how to use the data over the default maps on Garmin.

  120. Not just in the wilderness by gripped · · Score: 1

    Girl of four died in sat-nav error crash in Blackrod

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12360687/

    Too many people blindly follow these things. There's a ford a few miles from me that is impassable for much of the year if not in a Land Rover etc. After heavy rain only a big tractor could make it.
    Yet every year the fire service pulls out 6 - 10 cars whose drivers followed their Sat Navs instructions to pass through it. There is a easily visible water depth gauge.

  121. Uhh... HELLO??!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a reason why it's called DEATH Valley... emphasis on the DEATH part! It's right there in the name - as in, like, here you gonna' DIE!!! Sheesh!

  122. Stupid priest by Kakao · · Score: 1

    flying helium balloons asked during the flight how to operate the GPS which he borrowed. He ended landing in the sea and dying. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1J11EhUd7k

    --
    2011. The year Gnome decided Linux will never be on the desktop.
  123. Death by circles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless where you are, you'd stuck if your gps takes you around the circles.

    My Tomtom famously remarked:

    Turn around when possible, then, make a U turn.

  124. Been there, seen that, done that: USMil in Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget one thing! In the first amero-iraq war, everybody expected the yankee to end up like Rommel, only worse. Yet, GPS sat tech allowed US Army and USMC troops to precisely cross vast uncharted deserts, without any visual navigational waypoint and they did that with less then minimal losses.

    Now, everybody knows military is not the place where the brightest congregate. Average US soldier is not good for college, many of them hispanic or negro, who never got a chance of getting good eduction due to lesser family wealth status. Many of them only minimally literate, yet they were able to use GPS and crush Iraq.

    Maybe the key is to read the manual and drill the use of GPS, so even the borderline stupid people cannot commit stupid mistakes using satnav.

  125. Real Men by DrChandra · · Score: 1

    Real men do not stop and ask directions, we trust our maps and our navigational equipment. Our task is to muddle through, no matter how bad it gets. Turning back after having invested so much time and energy to get to the end of this road we are on is to admit defeat. This road we travel may start out looking good. It may give every indication that it will lead to where we want to go. Its features may dwindle as we go along, like our relationship to our spouse tends to, but we cling to our plan, our course, our commitment, because it is our duty. Our vehicle is our trusted war horse, and will take us through any terrain. The fact that we eventually wind up in a situation we cannot cope with is of secondary concern. Too bad if we drive over the cliff. We will make camp at the bottom, and sally forth again in the morning, refreshed anew. Cowboy up!

    --
    Words, words, words ... Buz, buz! - Hamlet, Act II, Scene II