Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Watch TV In 2012?

zaba writes "Once again, I can hear the tell-tale signs of a hard drive dying. This time, it's in the DVR for one of our TVs. In the U.S., are we at a point where, with a little technical savvy, 'cutting the cord' makes sense? If so, what are the best options? Does a refurb Roku (anywhere from 60-80 USD) make the most sense? Does building a mythbox or some such device make sense? For my family of four (ages 36, 30, 13 and 4), we are paying ~100 USD/month for two receivers (one with a DVR). What, in your opinion, is the best option to have TV service in two rooms of the house? Kid's shows could be in one room and adult shows in another. Or, all of it could be on one server (I have computers lying around) that could go to multiple rooms. We like the DVR for the instant access, but saving a hundred bucks a month would be nice as well. I can drop CAT-5 as needed, but Wi-Fi would be preferred. For programming, we currently have 'standard' cable and mostly watch the major networks. I would love to have ESPN, but can get my sports fix (mostly college football) through other means, I'm sure. How do you all watch TV? What have you found to be the best way to get what you want?"

326 of 479 comments (clear)

  1. Best way to watch TV by Niris · · Score: 5, Funny

    By looking at it.

    1. Re:Best way to watch TV by Niris · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also on a more serious note: Netflix. My girlfriend and I only have that and it works great. You can set it to play only kid shows fairly simply, there's a pretty solid amount of content, and you can always rent movies if you really want them (or torrent, if that's your thing). I run ours through a Wii in the bedroom and a PS3 in the living room, though you could do it with a computer as well. Biggest pain would be using a keyboard and mouse, but I feel like they also sell remotes for computers so you could look into that.

    2. Re:Best way to watch TV by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Looking at it...1/3 of the time.

      Game on one monitor (currently Tera), surf on the other (yeah,'I know, only two monitors is pathetic) and big screen TV behind them against the wall.

      Truth be told, the second, surfing monitor is often playing fullscreen TV.

      ATTENTION GAME MAKERS!!! Make sure fullscreen on one monitor is functional while it is technically backgrounded when surfing on the other monitor.

      ATTENTION VIDEO SITES AND FLASHPLAYER!!! Make sure you can run fullscreen on one monitor while technically backgrounded and a game is foreground on the other monitor.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Best way to watch TV by msauve · · Score: 2

      I like Netflix, it's good for entertainment content. But, something I haven't found for any media box, is CNN. Live news. On some, you can access the video files CNN puts on their website, but not CNN/HLN live feeds. My wife's addicted, so cable it is.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Best way to watch TV by Idbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bonus points if you're actually looking at the screen. Looking at the back of the device is kind of boring.

    5. Re:Best way to watch TV by Zizi · · Score: 1

      And if you get bored with the TV you can look at the radio as well.

    6. Re:Best way to watch TV by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Make sure fullscreen on one monitor is functional while it is technically backgrounded

      If that doesn't work, run two computers with one head each and use Synergy to move between them.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    7. Re:Best way to watch TV by wallsg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We watch Netflix via a PS3 and OTA via an antenna in the dead air space above our ceiling.

      Sports is likely to be your biggest drawback of dropping cable or satellite.

      We're not big on sports or "regular" TV so this suffices for us. Honestly, after you get used to it you'll wonder why you bothered to watch half the stuff you did. I did miss not getting to watch the second half of The Walking Dead season two (should be coming to Netflix in the relatively near future), but as long as you're willing to wait for them to get to Netflix (or willing to buy or otherwise "acquire" the episodes over the internet) you'll be fine. If you watch a couple of hours of TV per night you'll have literally years worth of movies and really good television series that you meant to watch but somehow never did just waiting for you. With no commercials you can know out three half-hour shows in just a touch over an hour. I guess that would be a season of 24 in about 18 to 19 hours...

      PS3 sucks hard for Youtube. Big hoops to jump through to get anything other than low-res video there. You can either go through third-party websites or set up a proxy PC.

      I will probably like to watch the Olympics to a greater degree than what will be OTA so I'll just plug my laptop into my receiver via HDMI and stream whatever's available online. BTW, that works pretty good with a Toshiba Thrive android tablet too.

    8. Re:Best way to watch TV by BrainRam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. There's no CNN, no Fox News, no MSNBC, no 24 hour live news at all.

      It's absolutely FANTASTIC!

    9. Re:Best way to watch TV by msauve · · Score: 1

      You mean the one with a 1.8 (out of 5) user rating, and with numerous complaints about crashing?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:Best way to watch TV by SDrag0n · · Score: 2

      I've found the Tivo Slide works pretty well for controlling it since it supports Bluetooth. The only downside is to get it to work well in Windows, you really need to buy Intelliremote by Melloware to map the keys to functions.

      --
      I don't have time to make a sig
    11. Re:Best way to watch TV by ThePeices · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, Fox has a news channel?

    12. Re:Best way to watch TV by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 2

      I find it easy to tune into newscasts with a plain old Linux computer when I want news. No CNN, but news.google.com (ok not TV) and www.democracynow.org (1 hour long video or audio).

      I haven't had a TV in years, and I'm going to cancel netflix soon too for the summer. Maybe re-open the account in the winter when it's cold out

    13. Re:Best way to watch TV by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > And if you get bored with the TV you can look at the radio
      > as well.

      The TV can be just as interesting to watch as the radio if you turn it off. I agree that on it is more boring, though.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    14. Re:Best way to watch TV by msauve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, it's the counterpoint to MS-NBC.

      The thing is, each seems to be watched by people who only want reinforcement of their own worldviews. That's no way to develop an intelligent, informed opinion.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re:Best way to watch TV by tukang · · Score: 1

      You can use your smartphone as a remote. It actually works pretty well.

    16. Re:Best way to watch TV by Grishnakh · · Score: 3

      Personally, I don't give two shits about live news on TV. If I want to hear breaking news, I can get that online at news.google.com, cnn.com, msnbc.com, bbc.com, etc. It's much faster for me to skim through news articles anyway than to listen to some bobblehead speak, though many of these sites have video feeds available too if you really want that.

      Of course, if your wife is the one that really wants that, then you're stuck. Been there, done that. Sometimes there's no reasoning with women.

    17. Re:Best way to watch TV by pacapaca · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Honestly I've found some of the best news and in-depth segments can be found on Al Jazeera which has free live streaming. Many of their English-speaking reporters/presenters are ex-BBC people and it's proper news (not the fluff found on most US "news" channels). There's even a plugin for integration with XBMC (and possibly others)... Definitely worth a look!

    18. Re:Best way to watch TV by Surt · · Score: 2

      I'm fairly sure that's the exact opposite of the best way.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    19. Re:Best way to watch TV by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not even close to equivalent. Fox-apologists just like to trot out that comparison to make their propaganda machine seem like just another biased source.

      All 24-hour news is ratings-driven crap, but Fox takes it to a level that would make Pravda editors blush.

    20. Re:Best way to watch TV by LtGordon · · Score: 2

      Just an anecdote: I currently have a PS3 and a Hulu Plus subscription. A good number of the shows that I watch regularly are available so it's always been worth the $8/month to me in lieu of paying for cable+DVR (I have erratic work hours so a DVR would be a must).

      That being said, I just got home from working a 12-hour shift and couldn't wait to collapse into the couch and watch TV... Apparently Sony released a system update today/yesterday. In order to log in to streaming video services you have to have your system up-to-date. I have been sitting here for 20 minutes now waiting on the update to download/install and it's not quite done yet. I just wanted to watch a damn TV show...

      Note: this isn't an everyday occurrance and I can't remember the last time it did happen, but it is something worth taking into account when weighing your options.

    21. Re:Best way to watch TV by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      If you use a computer, you can buy the logmein app ($30 USD). It's a bit expensive, but it keeps you from having to get a remote (which I figure is more expensive).

    22. Re:Best way to watch TV by msauve · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh noes! An MS-NBC watcher having his worldview threatened!

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    23. Re:Best way to watch TV by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been using and recommending PlayOn for several years. The open nature of their plugin system allows you to roll your own for any site out there. I did a quick search of one of the most active plugin/scripting sites for PlayOn and found this. With it's active scripting scene you can find just about anything you are looking for. And if you don't you can usually find someone willing to tackle it for you just for fun. Add to that the fact you can live stream from it to any DLNA compatible device as well as any iDevice/Android/BB over the internet.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    24. Re:Best way to watch TV by msauve · · Score: 1

      Tried it. No live 24 hour (live, streaming) news, from what I could find. Certainly not CNN or any other major.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    25. Re:Best way to watch TV by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      Indeed BrainRam, INDEED!
      It's not like they are actually providing real stories that they haven't skewed for their ratings/viewer-base/entertainment value.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    26. Re:Best way to watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would add that I prefer to have it turned off when I watch it. That way there are no distractions. No lights, no sound, no wardrobe malfunctions. Just the TV. A dark slab, like the monolith in 2001, just sitting there. It may hold untold knowledge, or it may drive you insane for the rest of your life. But for now it's just turned off, waiting for you to turn it on. But you're not going to, and eventually you leave the room triumphant.

    27. Re:Best way to watch TV by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the third link in my comment? It is specifically the CNN Live script. I haven't tried it but it's there.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    28. Re:Best way to watch TV by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. I had just been using different inputs on the monitors and two keyboards.

    29. Re:Best way to watch TV by Exclamation+mark! · · Score: 1

      I don't want to sound like an ass but how about getting of our fat lazy asses and going outside a little? We spend too much time watching TV as it is.

      --
      I'm a wanker.... and loving it!
    30. Re:Best way to watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought Fox was counterpoint to "Trotsky Daily" and the official "Democratic Republic of North Korea Thuthiness Network!".

      Alternatively, I thought it an entertainment channel.

      I couldn't quite decide.

    31. Re:Best way to watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We lived in Europe for a while and liked Al Jazeera a lot.

    32. Re:Best way to watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In contrary, the best way to look tv is not to look at all!

      If you come to think of it:
      * it steals you time you could do s.th. which not just makes time go by but by chaning s.th., do a hobby or stuff.
      * it shows you all these hero's which have no connection to reality and erode your self esteam.

      So you can't evolve and get more and more unhappy the more you watch TV.

    33. Re:Best way to watch TV by hammarlund · · Score: 3, Funny

      At our house we call Fox News "The Comedy Channel".

    34. Re:Best way to watch TV by Tomster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, come on. Look at what the other networks did with the Zimmerman/Martin case just for one example. Then there was the "exploding truck" case from a while back. And then....

      They are all biased and ratings-driven crap. Fox News appears to look worse to most people just because it is the only MSM voice that is right-wing instead of left-wing. It's a crowd of people on one side hollering "blue", one guy over there hollering "red". Who stands out?

      Thomas

    35. Re:Best way to watch TV by JustinTyme · · Score: 1

      I second Al Jazeera; its along the lines of BBC. That and NY1 filled my news needs when I was in NYC. As has been mentioned, we use browser for Netflix and any number of other websites streaming content. I get a couple dozen free TV stations from ComCast (W Hartford, CT and TWC when in NYC before this); YMMV. Subscribe to their broadband, split the cable, plug one end into the bridge and the other into the TV. I don't get Al Jazeera here in Hartford, but did in Astoria, Queens. I do get Ion, two series of PBS (24.1-5 and 57.1-5), amongst others. We use Netflix every day, as well, for both daughter and adult programming via a browser. MANY documentaries and movies. Amazon gets daughter her Team UmiZoomi, also via browser. Free membership to ESPN's online club gets me ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPN3, again via browser. Watched ITALY-ENGLAND the other day, but there are also other sports of course. Of course, its a bit more complicated than just having cable, but its a ton cheaper as well. We've not paid for cable in a couple years and I have all the programming, and more, that we need. We stream thru a DVD-less Mac Mini, but you can get a small Windows or Linux box to do that. We rip our DVDs (which also works when travelling with our tablet), or with Mac OS you can share DVD player from another computer on the network. Brave new world; check it out. You can always go back if it doesn't work for you.

    36. Re:Best way to watch TV by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      That stuff happened A LOT last year when the PSN was hacked and down for a long time. You had to jump through hoops to get the ps3 to play netflix. I tried a google tv box which did 80% of what I wanted, as did a roku player. At the end of the day I had to use a full blown computer with a keyboard to get 90% of what I wanted. Now I'm minus live tv, sports, news and have to winnow through the 47,000 different show/retention schedules that differ for each program (You can see this show, but not that one. These two episodes but not these three. Three most recent. Some random episode from last year. You'll get used to it)

      Seems like everything has a big hole in it that makes it useless for some slice of customers. The roku player wont authenticate an hbo go account if you're a directv subscriber because directv wants to obstruct who uses content, and it has to go through their box. The google tv box wont play regular hulu and has no hulu plus app.

      The technology is there and the content is there, but the obstructionism and protectionism and bunch of old bald guys who want to control the distribution will continue to make a mess of things for years to come.

    37. Re:Best way to watch TV by cfulton · · Score: 2

      BBC or Al Jazeera are both better news sources for American news than any American 24 hour news channel. American "news" is not news at all it is 100% news commentary. Instead of telling us what happened they tell us how to feel about what happened. I can decide on my own thank you very much.

      --
      No sigs in BETA. Beta SUCKS.
    38. Re:Best way to watch TV by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Also on a more serious note: Netflix

      It won't work for me; the PC that uses the TV as a monitor runs Linux. Besides, there is so much free and legal TV on the internet, why pay for the same thing?

      Biggest pain would be using a keyboard and mouse

      My keyboard sits on a shelf, I haven't touched it in months. In fact, the batteries are dead. There's very little that I can't do with a mouse on it (yay Linux!), and the mouse works well on the arm of the couch and takes less room than a remote.

    39. Re:Best way to watch TV by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Looks like the streaming options for the Olympics will be better this time around.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    40. Re:Best way to watch TV by Vastad · · Score: 1

      Ask anyone who has watched BBC for the last 10 years, and they'll tell you that BBC News has gone down the toilet of "entertainment as news/news as entertainment" and is pretty much exactly the British equivalent of CNN. The accents don't actually mean it's better.

      Al Jazeera is a great choice mostly because it's not a Western viewpoint. Same with Russia Today who will happily poke at topics BBC and CNN dropped very quickly or never discussed at all, and it streams live online 24/7.
      If it isn't blocked, there is also PressTV which is the Iranian CNN, certain to have a different point of view of the same global topics. All three broadcast in English.

      I would love it if China had an English language news channel, just to hear their angle on the same major topics.

    41. Re:Best way to watch TV by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      They do - it's called CCTV 9. http://www.cctv-9.com/2005/

    42. Re:Best way to watch TV by Vastad · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link. Unfortunately it seems the video player is broken. Appears to be some sort of Windows Media plugin that none of my browsers play nice with.

  2. My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    HD TiVo w/ Antenna Broadcast HD channels
    ESPN via XBox Live

    My TiVo, BluRay, Xbox, Receiver, and TV can all stream:
    Netflix
    Hulu Plus
    Amazon Prime

    1. Re:My Setup by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in Iceland I get my TV service through something called "myndlykill"; I don't know the English word for it, but it's a box with a Cat5 on the back that plugs into your hub and downloads channels from the net and yeilds an HDMI signal. Most people here have 50Mb/s or 100Mb/s optical fiber net connections so there's enough bandwidth for a good picture.

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
    2. Re:My Setup by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Just realized how wordy I was. Short version:
      SETUP 1 :
      - free antennaTV + DVR
      + Hulu
      + DVD or uTorrent
      + clarkesworldmagazine.com, asimovs.com

      SETUP 2 (if antennas not allowed)
      - $25/mo Dish
      + hulu, DVD, etc

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:My Setup by tprox · · Score: 1

      Does it translate to anything? "Myndlykill" looks like Mindly-kill ... kill your brainnnnnnsssss.....brainnnsssss....tv gooood...

    4. Re:My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most people here have 50Mb/s or 100Mb/s optical fiber net connections so there's enough bandwidth for a good picture.

      Didn't we just get through a whole thread of "ooooh, aaaaaaaah, we Europeans are so much better than you Americans" within the past day or two? ;)

    5. Re:My Setup by hantms · · Score: 2

      Here in Iceland I get my TV service through something called "myndlykill"; I don't know the English word for it, but it's a box with a Cat5 on the back that plugs into your hub and downloads channels from the net and yeilds an HDMI signal.

      I'd buy that just for the name alone.

    6. Re:My Setup by Rei · · Score: 1

      It literally means "picture key", although "mynd" ("picture", pronounced "MEEND") is also used to refer to video and "lykill" ("key", pronounced "LEE-kitl") can also be used for tools to open things up.

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
    7. Re:My Setup by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Here in Iceland I get my TV service through something called "myndlykill"; I don't know the English word for it, but it's a box with a Cat5 on the back that plugs into your hub and downloads channels from the net and yeilds an HDMI signal. Most people here have 50Mb/s or 100Mb/s optical fiber net connections so there's enough bandwidth for a good picture.

      If you're watching a single channel at a time there's no need for 50+Mb/s or fiber. 5Mb/s is enough for a standard definition channel and 9Mb/s is enough for full HD. So this can go through a regular ADSL2+ connection with no problem as long as the length of your phone line is less than 2 km (~1.25 miles). That how all French ISPs offer Triple-Play: Internet+Phone+TV.

      I'll grant you that things are different if you want to record one channel while watching another, or if you want to watch one channel while your kids watch another. It's also likely to change in the coming years with 3D, 4K, high refresh rates, etc.

    8. Re:My Setup by Rei · · Score: 1

      How can "full HD" be so little of a bandwidth increase over standard def? Something's not right with that. Someone's playing loose with the definition of "full HD". It's probably 1920x1024, thus earning the label, but a low data rate per frame.

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
    9. Re:My Setup by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I added some margin to be comfortable. SD is actually either a 3.5Mb/s MPEG2 stream or around 1.8Mb/s in MPEG4 (that latter stream is mostly to extend the availability of TV to long ADSL lines so not geared towards top quality). The HD streams start at 6Mb/s which is already three times more and, as far as I know, they never go above 9.5Mb/s which is for over-the-air HD. So yeah, it's not the 30Mb/s you get from a Blu-Ray but by that standard there's no HD broadcast TV (DVB-T tops out at 30Mb/s but no broadcaster is going to allocate that much to a single TV channel).

      Can you confirm that you're actually getting significantly more from your provider?

    10. Re:My Setup by Rei · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have no clue how much bandwidth the device uses. All I can say is that is that 9 MB/s isn't that much of an improvement over 5Mb/s ;)

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
    11. Re:My Setup by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have no clue how much bandwidth the device uses. All I can say is that is that 9 MB/s isn't that much of an improvement over 5Mb/s ;)

      You cannot compare an MPEG4 bitrate with an MPEG2 one. The right comparison is 1.8Mb/s to 9Mb/s which is over a 4x increase.

    12. Re:My Setup by Rei · · Score: 1

      I was simply going with the numbers that you gave me. You said "5Mb/s is enough for a standard definition channel and 9Mb/s is enough for full HD". Can't criticize me for using your numbers! :)

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
    13. Re:My Setup by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I was simply going with the numbers that you gave me. You said "5Mb/s is enough for a standard definition channel and 9Mb/s is enough for full HD". Can't criticize me for using your numbers! :)

      I guess my first post should not have assumed that everyone knows SD is usually broadcast in MPEG2 while HD always uses MPEG4. However I criticize you for not reading my second message where I clarified things:

      SD is actually either a 3.5Mb/s MPEG2 stream or around 1.8Mb/s in MPEG4

    14. Re:My Setup by Rei · · Score: 1

      I read your second message, but in case you forgot, one can't go back on Slashdot and alter an earlier post to reflect new information. You wrote a very plain, no-caveats "5Mb/s is enough for a standard definition channel and 9Mb/s is enough for full HD." It's absurd to criticize a person for using the information you yourself give them, and then get mad at them later for not retroactively realizing this when you correct your own information.

      The fault here is entirely yours, and I hope you can be grown up enough to acknowledge this. How would you like to find yourself involved in a conversation like:

      Paleontologist: The dendrochronological records suggest that the first eruption occurred 9500 years ago and the second eruption 6500 years ago.
      Respondant: But I read that the eruptions were 2000 years apart.
      Paleontologist: I added some margin to be comfortable. The first record is from site A and the second from site B, and site B records are believed to be skewed by about a thousand years relative to site A. Can I see your data on when the eruptions were, precisely?
      Respondant: Oh, I have no clue when the eruptions were, personally. I was just stating that the numbers you gave don't make sense.
      Paleontologist: You can't compare a dendrochronology record from site A with one from site B without an adjustment factor.
      Respondant: I was simply going with the numbers that you gave me. You said "The dendrochronological records suggest that the first eruption occurred 9500 years ago and the second eruption 6500 years ago." Can't criticize me for using your numbers! :)
      Paleontologist: I guess my first post should not have assumed that everyone knows that dates for the first eruption usually come from site A and dates for the second eruption from site B. However I criticize you for not reading my second message where I clarified things.
      Respondant: (bangs head against wall)

      That's what you're doing.

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
    15. Re:My Setup by nicestepauthor · · Score: 1

      My own setup:

      Sony Netplayer with subscription to Hulu Plus at $8 a month. 1/10th what I was paying for cable, and I get The Daily Show, Colbert, Korean dramas, Criterion collection movies, and tons of other stuff.

      Wall mounted indoor antenna.

      A DVD recorder with a hard drive for recording off the air programs. I can play them back from the hard drive or edit out commercials and burn to DVD.

      A Mac mini with Eye TV. I can convert the recordings to MP4 and save them.

      I'm getting more and better entertainment than I ever did with cable, and it's cheap!

    16. Re:My Setup by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I read your second message, but in case you forgot, one can't go back on Slashdot and alter an earlier post to reflect new information.

      Ok when I said "SD is actually either a 3.5Mb/s MPEG2 stream or around 1.8Mb/s in MPEG4" I forgot to then mention that HD is always broadcast as MPEG4. I though that was obvious and I still blame you for not wondering why I had brought it up, not doing any research; and for ignoring this new data in your next reply which was "All I can say is that is that 9 MB/s isn't that much of an improvement over 5Mb/s ;)" (so no need to bring up the impossibility of time travel here).

      This has gone on long enough anyway so you can now go on and on about my many faults without fear of further corrections on my part. I won't be replying to your messages anymore.

  3. Roku Box by Banichi · · Score: 2

    The Roku Box fills all of my TV watching needs.

    1. Re:Roku Box by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 2

      I concur. The Roku box makes no noise and is a low power draw when idle. With Roku + Netflix + Amazon, I never don't have something to watch. I only have Amazon because I forgot to cancel after a free promo when I wanted something shipped quickly. I'd also consider Hulu+ if I cared about current season shows.

      For sports, there's a sports bar within walking distance of my house. A beer is much cheaper and tastier than a cable bill.

    2. Re:Roku Box by jdwoods · · Score: 2

      Ditto. I cut the cord in late 1999 and don't see any reason to go back. I mainly like movies (all kinds: old/new, blockbuster/indie, etc.) and NetFlix (discs) fill that void better and cheaper than cable can.

      NetFlix instant (streaming) is also nice, but the selection is much, much less interesting. Very few titles on NetFlix streaming aren't available on disc, but most of those on disc are not available streaming. Streaming is great, however, for watching a TV series (when available) because you don't have to wait for discs in the mail. It's also nice to get HD on some content that's only available on DVD (not Blu-ray), but NetFlix streaming (at least these days) is a single audio track and non-optional subsititles only if the audio is not English. DVDs and Blu-ray often provide options for audio and subtitles that are very nice to have, especially for foreign films.

      I don't want or need a game console (Isn't that what a PC is for? ;) and the Roku box seems perfect for a "set-top" box. I have 2 (living room & bedroom) and am thinking about getting a 3rd for the TV in another bedroom. The Roku box works great with NetFlix streaming (which makes sense because Roku was spun off from NetFlix when they decided they weren't interested in selling hardware) but it's also great for Amazon Video-On-Demand (including free titles for Amazon Prime members), Pandora (free with no ads!) and various other channels. The high end (still less than $100!) Roku boxes even have USB ports to connect external storage for viewing local content (home movies, downloaded stuff, MP3s, etc.) but they aren't what I would call highly compatible with lots of media formats.

      For all my home theater needs, a nice 1080P TV plus quality surround/amplifier/speakers plus Blu-ray player (backward compatible with DVD and CD, of course) plus a Roku connected to the Internet via WiFi meets my needs very, very well. Oh... and we occasionally watch OTA (over the air) broadcast TV for local news, NFL games or the rare sitcom that's interesting and not available via NetFlix.

      --
      -- Jeff Woods
    3. Re:Roku Box by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      With the current generation of roku devices, only the top of the line comes with an ethernet cable input and USB port, and then you can only play MP4 files, AVI is a no go.

      I returned my roku and got a WD TV box, which is pretty much the same price but plays all the video formats I've thrown at it. I plugged an external hard drive into it and can then play anything I download on it. It isn't as smooth as the roku though, sometimes it freezes. Same price.

    4. Re:Roku Box by Surt · · Score: 1

      Just for the sake of argument: for me cable tv is basically a free add on for my internet service. The difference in price for naked cable internet vs cable package including tv is only $5 per month. And that nets me infinity on demand which has pretty much the same streaming stuff as netflix.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Roku Box by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Another thumbs up for the WD TV Live box from me. For such a cheap device, it's really awesome and plays pretty much any video file you can throw at it. Tiny and consumes virtually no power. I just have mine hooked to the LAN and keep all my media on the big 2 TB NAS box in the other room, but you can also just plug a USB key directly into it.

      Plus it has integration with YouTube, Pandora and a bunch of other services (and here in Australia, the ABC iView catchup TV service, which I have to admit probably accounts for half my viewing).

    6. Re:Roku Box by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      That's basically our setup, too. We just ditched cable a month ago to save a little on the cost, and went with a Roku. Netflix + Amazon + Hulu Plus gives us a ton of things to watch. Mostly I just want a movie now and then, but my wife burns through whole seasons of TV shows over the span of a week or two.

      I don't have a good answer for sports, unfortunately. I know you can get some sports packages, but the only one I looked into - MLB.tv - has blackout rules which means your subscription gets you everything except live games of your local team ... which is of course the one you probably want to watch. There's a delay (about an hour?) after each local game before you're allowed to watch it. This isn't always a problem, if, for instance, you want to catch the day game in the evening, or catch the summary of a late-night game you missed, or you're a fan of a team that's not local. I think you can also listen to a radio broadcast of the game live, if that's good enough for you.

      As an aside, we've got the Roku upstairs, while downstairs we're making use of our PS3 to do Netflix and Amazon. Not sure if we've figured out if we can do Hulu on it or not. For general watching I think I find the Roku a little more convenient, and of course it's a lot cheaper, but being able to game on the PS3 is nice, too.

  4. Roku or AppleTV by rgbscan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would have recommended a Roku or AppleTV with Netflix and Hulu Plus.... but Hulu Plus just started running political ads. Arrrgghh. Amazon Prime is a nice to have, but not needed. I rarely find something there that Netflix doesn't have.... unless you want reality tv stuff or those "dirty job" type shows. Amazon Prime streaming seems to have those in spades.

    1. Re:Roku or AppleTV by theelectron · · Score: 1

      I second the Netflix idea. Though, Mythbox is useful if you have a large digital repository of videos already, otherwise you probably won't need it with a streaming video service.

    2. Re:Roku or AppleTV by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      I've got both Roku and Apple TV. The Apple TV integrates nicely with iTunes, but the Roku seems to be more open for third party content/apps (Roku "channels"). Scanning through the available channels reminds me of the early internet: some gems and a lot of crap. I actually like the crap in a public access sort of way. It's great for people with a fetish (mine is Korean dramas, on DramaFever!). $99 for the top of the line Roku, complete with motion controller and a copy of Angry Birds, is a great deal.

    3. Re:Roku or AppleTV by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thirded.

      I gave up on cable about five years ago, and have yet to regret it. I can get full seasons, commercial free, from NetFlix within a year of their original airing.

      I seriously wonder why I ever paid over $1200/year for something I can get for a tenth that, and without the single biggest nuisance associated with live TV - The one that people pay more for devices to extract - Commercials.


      Cut the cord, dude! You'll never regret it.

    4. Re:Roku or AppleTV by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How much data is this though. I know I have a 250gb limit but I have no concept how much this actually is in terms of TV shows. Especially if this is streaming (ie, if I rewind I assume it stupidly sends the same data again). And from what I could tell any streaming would absolutely destroy any internet responsiveness until that stops. It just doesn't seem practical for most people, at least not for a cheaper price than cable/satellite.

      DVR makes a lot of sense, streaming just seems stupid to me. DVR means saving broadcast data, and that is very efficient in terms of bandwidth to cable/satellite companies. Streaming means sending the same data over and over and over, wasting enormous amounts of bandwidth if this ever becomes popular, plus this is all streamed during peak hours only. What would make sense is a combined stream+DVR. Ie, download the stuff at 3am when internet usage is low then watch it at anytime after that, no need to sync back up if you rewind or fast forward. I wouldn't mind seeing ISPs give discounts for off-peak usage to encourage this instead of the normal on-demand mentality.

    5. Re:Roku or AppleTV by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      I would have recommended a Roku or AppleTV with Netflix and Hulu Plus.... but Hulu Plus just started running political ads. Arrrgghh. Amazon Prime is a nice to have, but not needed. I rarely find something there that Netflix doesn't have.... unless you want reality tv stuff or those "dirty job" type shows. Amazon Prime streaming seems to have those in spades.

      This.

      DVR is not video on demand. Netflix, Hulu, Amazon prime etc is the future. My family does it, we have Netflix and recently got a HD tv with internet (NF, AP, YT etc). So we can have netflix on the tv, on a Roku box we've had for a while, on pc and the Wii. There is a limit on concurrent devices, but we routinely have more than one stream at a time with AP/YT/NF.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    6. Re:Roku or AppleTV by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I still have a cable subscription, and that's mostly because I tend to keep my TV on all day for background noise. I do nearly all of my TV viewing outside of evening news by Internet: Hulu Plus, Netflix, iTunes when I have to have it now. Then there's YouTube, Internet Archive, and USENET for everything else I could never get on DVD. Crackle is another option, but I know nothing about it.

      As for devices, I have a Xbox 360 and PS3 both of which can play video or stream from Netflix and Hulu. On Xbox 360, this feature requires paid subscription to Xbox Live. I also have an Oppo Digital upscaling DVD player that can load Flash video, h.264, xvid, and other formats. I also have an Apple TV. Apple TV has YouTube and Netflix support as well as iTunes. There's additional streaming options as well, but I haven't tried them. I don't like Apple TV that much though for Netflix. The interface and search via Netflix' website is far better. Also, sometimes, Netflix playback on Apple TV pauses or stutters. This has never been a problem for me using Netflix's website. iTunes is good as expected.

    7. Re:Roku or AppleTV by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      And you can use your smartphone or tablet as a remote control. Before you write that off as a gimmick, consider how easy it is to lose a remote control, and how you always have your phone with you.

      The top of the line roku and the WD TV box are nice for the USB ports as well, can play torrented videos on the TV easily (though roku limits the formats you can play.)

    8. Re:Roku or AppleTV by EdIII · · Score: 1

      CDNs help somewhat with the streaming bandwidth. Netflix is creating their own CDN networks. ISPs don't really care about the bandwidth so much if it does not leave their networks.

      As for the bandwidth itself, a 720p stream might be around half a gig for a 30 minute show, and 1 gig for a 60 minute show. It will be dependent on quality though. Generally, I would not expect a 720p stream to exceed 2 gigs for 60 minutes, even at very high quality.

      For 1080p you can pretty much quadruple those figures.

      Streaming has no effect on Internet responsiveness for me. I do a lot of VOIP and other low latency traffic at the same time and have not noticed an issue. If you have the bandwidth for it, you probably would not notice it either.

      DVR's will suffer from one major, huge, astronomically sized drawback. Requires Cable Subscription . I would shoot myself before paying those bastards again, but if you have a cable subscription, not much point in streaming is there?

    9. Re:Roku or AppleTV by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How do you get fast enough internet without going through a cable provider?

    10. Re:Roku or AppleTV by EdIII · · Score: 1

      You can get Internet without having a cable subscription. Cable subscription usually means TV programming, not Internet.

      DSL can get you broadband and has nothing to do with cable either. Satellite (I know, yuck) can get you broadband, as well as some wireless 4G providers.

      You don't have to settle for bundling, or be forced to buy their programming. I have been paying for Internet only for almost a decade now.

    11. Re:Roku or AppleTV by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well DSL is generally too slow. VDSL from AT&T is what I have now and it's great, but it's still offered by a cable company essentially, even if you don't subscribe to their TV service. I had assumed the disgust at a cable provider would have extended to their other services.

    12. Re:Roku or AppleTV by gshegosh · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone would give some thoughts about watching TV the 2012-way outside of "the first world". I'm not in the USA, UK or Germany. I'm inside EU, but services such as Netflix are NOT globally available. Are there any good alternatives that are legal? Or is Pirate Bay the only sensible option.

  5. What's on? by Threni · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you found anything worth watching yet? Whenever I hear about something good I check it out, but it just seems like shit to me. Game of thrones? Lord of the rings with tits. Caprica 1? Zzzzz. Walking Dead? Nothing ever happens - there's a strict 5 zombies per episode limit (apart from the last episode - perhaps it's the same 5 zombies over and over, though).

    Loads of talk of 3D, google/apple/whatever tv, but if it's just the same old shit then it seems like a waste of a lot of money. Just stick the good stuff on the net so we can watch it whenever.

    1. Re:What's on? by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>Game of thrones? Lord of the rings with tits.

      I fail to see the drawback.

      >>>Caprica 1? Zzzzz. Walking Dead? Nothing ever happens

      Agree on Caprica (though it had a great 5-episode ending... watch it on syfy or hulu). Walking Dead is better in comic book form because you can read at your own place, plus it's about 5 seasons ahead of the TV show's current location in the plot.

      Maybe look to the past: The 90s. Hercules was blah, but its spinoff Xena was quite good from season 2 onward. Also Star Trek DS9 and Babylon 5 (my top 2 favorites) and Outer Limits and Twilight Zone and X-Files and Sliders (season 1,2). Basically TV was better in the 90s.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:What's on? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the drawback.

      No kidding. I pity the person who can't enjoy Naked Dragon Girly. BTW: Why didn't her clothes burn off when her dragon children charbroiled the wizard in the second season? They burned off in the first in her husband's funeral pyre.

    3. Re:What's on? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      heads up on the walking dead: the title refers to the survivors, not the zombies. hence the show is about human drama in a zombie apocalypse. plenty of shit has happened. i could drop a few examples but it's spoilers for others. and what other zombie tv show have you seen that gets away with this much gore? they routinely burst heads open and hack bodies up in the walking dead. even the creators have expressed surprise that amc lets them get away with their graphic violence.

      i admit i've read the books since they came out and there is plenty of fucked up shit happening in the story line that waiting for the rearranged-for-tv version is exciting enough. it seemed like forever before they got to the part where carl kills zombie-shane. i liked the book version better though, where carl kills the living shane.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    4. Re:What's on? by PIBM · · Score: 1

      You might had forgotten the rest of the episode..

    5. Re:What's on? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      Maybe, as the line at the start of the latest Futurama said: "Not sure if new episode or just rerun of episode I watched drunk..."

    6. Re:What's on? by morari · · Score: 1

      My god, am I ever glad that Game of Thrones didn't end up being as boring as Lord of the Rings... tits or no tits.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    7. Re:What's on? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      What's Wilfred?
      (will look it up later as well)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  6. the best way to watch tv by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Informative

    is not to watch tv. seriously, it sucks.

    1. Re:the best way to watch tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      is not to watch tv. seriously, it sucks.

      Agree, don't watch tv. Plus you're supporting the legions of hell.

    2. Re:the best way to watch tv by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, you suck.

      It doesn't suck. Like any medium most of it sucks, some of it is good. No more or less then movies music or books.

      Maybe you should think about the stories and no be so fanatically hateful of he medium in which it is delivered?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:the best way to watch tv by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it sucks. Used to be there were so many shows* I couldn't keep-up. (I had to tape them and catchup during Christmas hiatus and summer break.) Now the channels are mostly filled with reality crap, even the National Geographic (!) and Syfy Channel (building cars == fantasy or sci-fi??). I often flip through the cable when on business trips, and wonder why anyone would pay for it.

      *
      * The 90s; Just off the top of my head:
      Seinfeld, Friends, Quantum Leap, Star Trek TNG, Babylon 5, DS9, Voyager, Twilight Zone, X-Files, Sliders, Buffy, Angel, Xena, Hercules, Timetrax, Ren & Stimpy..........

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:the best way to watch tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of those shows are legitimately terrible, and if you had been ten-fifteen years older when they first aired you'd hate them just like you hate shows now. Seriously, Sliders? Voyager?

      Let's do this for shows from the last ten years, just off the top of my head:
      Arrested Development, The Office, 30 Rock, Eastbound and Down, Flight of the Conchords, Breaking Bad, Spartacus, Game of Thrones, Battlestar Gallactica, Lost, South Park, Futurama.

      Good shows will always exist. You just won't always make them your highest priority in life. If you can't find them, or don't appreciate them, it's your problem, not TV's.

    5. Re:the best way to watch tv by c0lo · · Score: 1

      You just won't always make them your highest priority in life. If you can't find them, or don't appreciate them, it's your problem, not TV's.

      I can still express my personal opinion of "They suck", can't I?
      You not accepting it... it's your problem, not mine.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:the best way to watch tv by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>> Seriously, Sliders? Voyager?

      The first two seasons of each were both excellent. They went downhill later on (after the original writers/creators quit) And even when they went downhill, they were still better than watching the Deadliest Catch or Jersey Sho.

      >>>Arrested Development, The Office, 30 Rock, Eastbound and Down, Flight of the Conchords, Breaking Bad, Spartacus, Game of Thrones, Battlestar Gallactica, Lost, South Park, Futurama.
      >>>
      30 rock, AD are not funny. But I love the office, south park. (Futurama was a late-90s show.) Lost was an incoherent mess. BSG and Thrones are both good. Spartacus was not (bit like watching a videogame; all action; almost no story). Never seen the others you mention.

      Perhaps the difference is that in the 90s I could come home, pop on the TV, and find something to watch. NOW I come-home, pop on the TV, and see every channel is filled with reality shit. :-o Like today. I'm working late because the tv guide says there's NOTHING at home worth watching.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    7. Re:the best way to watch tv by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      True. Most of those also were broadcast television as well. There is basically nothing at all to worth watching on free broadcast anymore, very little to watch on on major cable channels, and most of the interesting stuff is on smaller cable channels which over time are getting dumber ("science" channel showing stuff about Nostradamus). And those smaller channels are typically not included in the cheapest package from the cable/satelllite company. Stuff that people seem excited about is on premium channels; ie you get normal cable and then pay an additional $12/month for an extra channel just so you can watch one show!

      But there is still some stuff I watch. It is more expensive than it was, back when it was $40/month digital directtv when cable was $70 with more inconvenience, but over time the price has been trickling up. Still better than cable though. Trouble is I can't really replace it with internet unless I seriously cut back way beyond what little I do watch. You can't get decent internet at all in the US without going through a cable provider or similar (such at A&T uverse). No way can you watch over normal 1.5Mbps DSL.

      What they need to do, and will never do, is split all this stuff apart. Get your television ala-carte from cable/satellite. Then viewers can vote with their wallet, pare down the bills.

      So when I stop subscribing to TV I think that will be the end of TV for me. Unless I do what some friends do and subscribe to netflix DVD service.

    8. Re:the best way to watch tv by shiftless · · Score: 2

      It doesn't suck.

      Nope, you're wrong. TV sucks. Don't believe me? Try not watching it for a years, then come back. It's a cancer, rotting your brain from the inside.

    9. Re:the best way to watch tv by shiftless · · Score: 2

      If you can't find them, or don't appreciate them, it's your problem, not TV's.

      I can find them just fine. It's called Google, and Bittorrent. Watching them on an actual television network is a complete waste of time.

    10. Re:the best way to watch tv by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>> TV is not only far and away better now, but through Pirate Bay and Netflix Instant, it's far easier to catch.....

      But I talking about actual, live TV. Obviously today is better since we can stream crap off the internet, or piratebay but the live actual TV is pretty abysmal. As I mentioned I'm going home tonight and probably won't turn-on the TV at all..... because there's nothing there. It wasn't like in the 90s when there was usually something to watch/

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    11. Re:the best way to watch tv by jdray · · Score: 2

      AFAIK, TV sucks because the people with the money behind the productions want to grow that money at the fastest rate possible. Somewhere along the way, they discovered reality television, which appeals to the teeming masses of trailer-bound, beer-swilling, junk food-eating middle America by injecting imaginably-relatable drama into their otherwise boring lives. These shows are cheap to produce when contrasted with the cost of any show that is attractive to... well, anyone else. Shows like Farscape, Firefly, Outcasts, and others get dropped in favor of the likes of Ghost Hunters, Fact or Faked, and Hollywood Treasure.

      But if it's their money, they should spend it the way they want. Better monetization models for "alternatively distributed" (Hulu, Netflix, etc.) shows need to be in place for content producers to feel like it's a safe bet. At an average of USD$1.5M to produce ONE episode of a decent sci-fi drama, it takes a lot of ads for triple-bladed razors or electric cars to get into profitability territory, let alone decent ROI.

      Any ideas on what earnings are for a reasonably-popular show on HuluPlus?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    12. Re:the best way to watch tv by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Even ignoring content, looking at the financial incentive structure in the advertising-driven USA market, I can only conclude that the effective reason content is put on television is to get you to watch more television. That does suck.

    13. Re:the best way to watch tv by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I have a monitor hooked up to HDMI/laptop and a DVD player. I only watch what I want to watch, when I want and without commercials. TV (as in the standard broadcast model of transmission of so-called "entertainment") sucks alpaca balls. It is a cancer and it is bad for you.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    14. Re:the best way to watch tv by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      hahahah. what's so great about it?
      the stories about who is cheating on who? (vampires optional)
      the unfunny sitcoms that actually need laughtracks for the punchlines?
      wondering who's the best singer of shitty pop songs?
      wondering if the make believe singer in the make believe highschool is gay?
      the useless out of context sound bytes on the news?
      whether this old house is haunted?
      who's happier with whose wife?
      watching grandma 'jwow' saying she'll tell her grandkids she made pizza in italy?
      watching pregnant 16yos mutual idiocy?
      the 2352354623 girl-power/two minutes man-hate moments per second?
      watching cars go around in a circle 500 times?
      watching people throw/kick/hit balls?
      wrestling?
      watching shows about pyramids/stonehenge being docks/portals/messages to aliens?
      watching morgan freeman dumb theoretical astrophysics down to kindergarteners?
      the cop shows that make us sympathize with the criminals because the preachy cops remind us just how much our justice system sucks?
      commercials so annoying they make us make mental notes to NOT buy whatever is being pitched...every 2 minutes. ..and
      the $200 a month for 1500 channels of this shit.
      to quote AVGN: "AAAAAAAYYSSSSSSSS"

    15. Re:the best way to watch tv by fearofcarpet · · Score: 1

      The golden rule of TV in the 2000's; if I like it, it will be cancelled or, as with Community, they will just ruin it by firing the creator to make it "more appealing to a broad audience." Network TV is driven entirely by the lowest common denominator because it puts the most eyeballs in front of the ads. Seinfeld wouldn't have made it past the pilot in 2010. There are a few gems tucked away on non-network companies--It's Always Sunny, Breaking Bad, Futurama, The Daily Show--but I don't see how anyone in this day and age can spend more than two-three hours a week watching TV unless they're really into "Ow, My Balls!" marathons... or sports.

      And the best way to watch TV? Netflix, unless you live outside the US, in which case USENET+XBMC because the only thing worse than reality shows and canned laugh-tracks is commercials.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
    16. Re:the best way to watch tv by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Seinfeld, Friends, Quantum Leap, Star Trek TNG, Babylon 5, DS9, Voyager, Twilight Zone, X-Files, Sliders, Buffy, Angel, Xena, Hercules, Timetrax, Ren & Stimpy..........

      And you can find it all on BT and ED2K.

    17. Re:the best way to watch tv by houghi · · Score: 1

      Sure, those are the shows that you remember. I am sure there were as many that sucked and that you forgot.

      You name 14 shows over a period of 10 years. Many of them I thought sucked. Well, almost all that you named I dislike.

      I can easily name shows that I liked in the last few years. Some are still running.
      Breaking Bad, Great British Menu, Falling Skies, Black Mirror, How I met your mother, Lost Girl, The Event, Big Bang, Wild Boys, XIII, Tron Uprising, The Firm, Don't trust the bitch in app. 23, Suits, Nikita, New Girl, How I met your mother, How not to live your life, Happy Endings, Chuck, Dan for mayor, Episodes, This is not my world, Misfits.

      The Boss had a song about this in 1990 :57 channels (and nothing on)

      So the fact that there is no good things is from all times.

      Luckily with technology, we can now ignore what we do not want to see, but can concentrate on what we DO want to see.

      Sure, you won't be able to fill 24 hours a day with it. If that is what you want, then you have other issues. You can easily fill 2-3 hours a day unless you are one of the Grumpy Old Men.
      The technology I use is bittorrent, because where I live we havemany channels from many countries all showing CSI XYZ and soon the Limpics and nothing else.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    18. Re:the best way to watch tv by HnT · · Score: 1

      Seinfeld, Friends, Quantum Leap, Star Trek TNG, Babylon 5, DS9, Voyager, Twilight Zone, X-Files, Sliders, Buffy, Angel, Xena, Hercules, Timetrax, Ren & Stimpy..........

      I am just going to ignore that you listed Voyager, Buffy, Hercules and Friends as somehow positive examples; maybe when compared to the current reality crap.

      But now we have/had: BSG, Dexter, Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, The Shield, The Wire, Firefly, Top Gear etc... And these shows took tv shows to a whole new level in terms of story depth and production values. It is no wonder HBO, SHO et al. give hollywood a run for their money, or at least have them scared.

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    19. Re:the best way to watch tv by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      well if the money isn't there to produce anything interesting, why should I watch? I do know that as the dollar depreciates, things have been getting worse. this isn't limited to entertainment of course...

    20. Re:the best way to watch tv by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      The 2000s, off the top of my XBMC:
      The Shield, Fringe, 24, Better Off Ted, Futurama, Veronica Mars, Life On Mars (UK Version), Doctor Who, How I Met Your Mother, Firefly, Dexter, Sherlock, Battlestar Galactica, Penn & Teller's Bullshit!, Deadwood.

      There are good shows. It's just harder to find them because there's a lot more channels you have to sift through.

      May I suggest: http://www.imdb.com/search/title?num_votes=5000,&sort=user_rating,desc&title_type=tv_series

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    21. Re:the best way to watch tv by ed1park · · Score: 1

      Except for quantum leap, all garbage and pale in comparison to today.

      Post 90's just off the top of my head:
      Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, Dexter, Sopranos, Lost, Naruto, Death Note, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, Sealab 2021, Archer, Frisky Dingo, Samurai Champloo, Cowboy Bebop.......

    22. Re:the best way to watch tv by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      The main reason TV has traditionally sucked is the way in which it is delivered and consumed. It is pushed at the viewer on a preset schedule. Viewers are given many channels, and they end up flipping through channels randomly. As a result, the shows are designed to grab attention with loud gimmicks, and they must be written for low attention spans.

      However, the landscape is changing, and over the past several years we've had some of the best shows ever made. Because of DVRs and shows on DVD, it is much easier for a person to follow a show completely, and so certain shows are being written more intelligently for people who are paying attention. Because of the internet, it's much easier to read reviews and find shows which are high quality and suited to a person's interests.

      Of course, there's also more crap television being made than ever before! But that's why I don't get cable or flip through channels. I choose things that are worth my time. There is also no shortage of awful books and websites, but it's easy for me to skip those things and just read what I care about.

      I happen to think TV can be a compelling story telling medium in the right hands. It allows for exploring and developing characters in depth much like a book, but with the visual language and theatrical elements of movies. One show which proves how artistically and excellently this can be done is Breaking Bad.

    23. Re:the best way to watch tv by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Another big difference is that in the 90's most of the shows to watch were on TV, in the 2000's they moved to cable, not they're mostly on premium cable channels.

    24. Re:the best way to watch tv by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      I've never seen AD, but 30 Rock is hilarious, the absurdity level is quite high and that appeals to me. The last season could have been better though, I think they are running out of ideas.
      Futurama was an old show, but the last 2 years they released new episodes, they are ok so far :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  7. Watch TV? by InspectorGadget1964 · · Score: 1

    Sit in front of the box and open your eyes

  8. XBMC by Bourgeois_Rage · · Score: 3, Informative

    I made the switch from cable to XBMC. Well we still get our internet through the cable company, but no longer do I get television through them. There's plenty of free streaming plugins in XBMC. And I have a server in another part of the house that hosts digital copies of TV shows and movies that stream over the wireless to a seamless picture and sound. I subscribe to Amazon Prime and get a lot of TV shows that way. It is very DIY, but once it is working, it is great.

    --
    I love the smell of napalm in the morning....
    1. Re:XBMC by Kryptonian+Jor-El · · Score: 1

      This, except instead of xbmc, I use PLEX on an older mac mini. I find it to be much more polished with a better organization for all of my files than xbmc. Also, I have The Episode Downloader (TED) set up to download new shows when they come out. PLEX has a lot of plug ins so I can use netflix if I want, but mostly I use the plug ins to access Colbert and Stewart. Also with utorrent remote, I can start the download any new movie or show from my phone, and it will download to plex.

      Pirate? sure, but even if you're not one for the high seas, its great for organizing your own legal content, and its plug ins provide access to all of the legal streaming services

      --
      All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
    2. Re:XBMC by Siridar · · Score: 1

      Do yourself a favor, and flick of TED for usenet, sabnzbd, sickbeard, and couchpotato. Forget about seeding, copyright notices, etc etc etc. Sickbeard is where its at.

  9. Good question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What have you found to be the best way to get what you want?

    I just flash my titties..

    1. Re:Good question! by c0lo · · Score: 1

      What have you found to be the best way to get what you want?

      I just flash my titties..

      Just curious... when you do that, does your TV switch channels? If positive, go see a doctor, your plastic surgeon may have forgotten in a remote during the last breast implant you had.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  10. Almost there... by mislam · · Score: 2

    I have been without cable or satelite for a year now. I have MythTV setup with dual tuner which captures OTA programs. After the shows get recorded an automated process converts the mpeg2 files into mpeg4 for lower file size and easy to stream in home network format. On the front end I have 4 apple TV connected to 4 TVs in different rooms. Each of them is running XBMC on it which streams the recorded programs from MythTV. My network is a mix of WIFI G and ethernet over power line. Works fairly well. Only problem is I can't watch live tv on the Apple TV because uncompressed mpeg2 is too much to stream. And the Apple TV are too underpowered to decode it properly. I get channel lineup information from schedulesdirect on yearly subscription. Anything I missed? My only gripe is not having sports access. This year missed NBA completely. :(

    1. Re:Almost there... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>> I get channel lineup information from schedulesdirect on yearly subscription.

      Interesting. Why not just use the TVguide built into the over-the-air broadcast?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Almost there... by vlm · · Score: 1

      uncompressed mpeg2 is too much to stream.

      No, it streams just fine. That's what I use, in fact its all I've ever used. Disk space is cheap and my old PVR1600 or whatever it is outputs it natively and gig-ethernet is way fast enough and pretty much any VDPAU nvidia powered mythtv frontend can handle it quite easily.

      And the Apple TV are too underpowered to decode it properly.

      Ahh that is the problem with uncompressed mpeg2.

      Everything I've heard about he appletv is that its tragically about a 99% solution as a frontend, almost enough power but not quite enough to actually work. Maybe by design.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  11. My Setup by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've learned not to try to tell people what to do, especially since they rarely listen (like my brother who spent $70/month on Dish when I had advised spending 1/3 that amount). Instead I tell them what works for me and let them decide:

    SETUP 1 :

    - free TV via an antenna. Attached to all the rooms in the house. Both an old VCR and DVR that I use to tape stuff while I'm sleeping.
    - supplemented by Hulu.com over PC or roku
    - supplemented by DVD purchases of shows not on hulu (like Games of Thrones). Supplemented by uTorrent if the DVD has not been released yet.
    - I also read a lot of mystery or sci-fi magazines online if nothing's on.

    SETUP 2 (if I lived where antennas are not allowed)
    - $25 a month Dish service for cable on two sets
    - supplemented by hulu, DVD, torrent, et cetera

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  12. Give yourself multiple options by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

    As it stands right now, an HTPC is going to do the most separate functions, but it's not necessarily the best option for all services. Here's my cord-cutter setup, and it works great for me:

    Roku for Amazon, Hulu+, Netflix: Clean interface, super low-power, remote easy enough for my daughter to learn at 4. You also get the 300+ other channels for Roku, plus a bunch of awesome private channels (and the ability to create your own, if you're so inclined). It's NOT a local streaming machine, though it's possible via a variety of hacks. Overall, we use this the most.

    HTPC for DVR functions and various internet stuff: I like Windows Media Center, but there are a bunch of different free flavors out there, depending on what hardware and software you're using. It's a great DVR for our OTA signal, plays every format available for downloaded stuff, and handles DVD rips by default. It's also the best way to play the stuff that content providers won't allow on Roku-style set-top boxes, like standard Hulu. Oh, and it does music, too, of course.

    TV Tuner for OTA: I use my HTPC for this sometimes, but really like the speed and ease-of-use of using the built-in TV tuner. YMMV.

    The main point here is that no one device is necessarily going to do everything you want it to, or not in the way you want it. A HTPC is the most versatile, but not always the prettiest or easiest for everyone in the family (if you're techie but your spouse/kids aren't, for example). I love my Rokus, and they're so cheap that it wasn't a big deal to get one for every TV. I don't miss cable at all.

    1. Re:Give yourself multiple options by geekoid · · Score: 2

      haha I love how 'cutting the cord' now equals subscribing to several different cords.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Give yourself multiple options by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      "It's NOT a local streaming machine, though it's possible via a variety of hacks. Overall, we use this the most."

      You don't need ugly hacks. Setup a Plex Media Server on your computer and run the Plex app (an official channel) on the Roku box. The server transcodes every video format imaginable to a form the Roku can play. It also automatically matches your video to metadata and artwork. The Plex app interface is as good as NetFlix and the server is dead simple to use -- install and configure it with the folders containing your videos.

      There are also great clients for Windows, Macs, Linux, iOS devices and Android devices.

      The Roku box is great and they fully support private channels.

    3. Re:Give yourself multiple options by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Even an official channel that still requires you to set up a server on a local machine and transcode video on the fly is a hack, even if it's a supported one. Plus if you don't have a machine that's good/fast for that task, you run into some problems.

      I love my Rokus very much, but it's still a hack to have to do all that.

    4. Re:Give yourself multiple options by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      Sure, but they're on-demand cords, have no long-term contracts or extra equipment, and they're very, very cheap compared to even a basic cable or sat package.

    5. Re:Give yourself multiple options by dark12222000 · · Score: 1

      The "cord" refers to a cable cord, which is bound by a minimum term contract, cancellation fees, is horribly overpriced, and is often controlled via monopoly.

      I'll take my netflix for 8$ a month and my HTPC hooked up to a symmetric 35/35mbs connection with uTorrent in the background.

    6. Re:Give yourself multiple options by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Plex requires separate server software, as the Roku isn't DLNA compliant and doesn't read (and stream from) network shares on its own.

  13. The best way by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You should have a home file server where everyone keeps everything. RAID 6 it. That way you never have to worry about dying hard drives.

    Put RTorrent on it with a watch directory. Sign up to a private TV torrent tracker with an RSS feed. Download the torrents linked to by those feeds into your watch directory. Share the torrent directory via Samba.

    Put a PC with XBMC anywhere you want to watch TV. Add your samba share as a source. You're done.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:The best way by Hatta · · Score: 2

      The best things in life usually are.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:The best way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, really it's just moderately illegal. More along the lines of slightly naughty, or sternly frowned upon.

    3. Re:The best way by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      How do you back it up?

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:The best way by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I maintain enough upload credit to download anything I want again.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:The best way by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      How do you back it up?

      You don't, someone else does. Or put another way, the internet is the backup. If a drive dies you just download the show again.

    6. Re:The best way by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      everything is always easier to warez 4 years later and much easier 8 years later.

      this applies to anime, knight rider and everything you can think of. even c64 games.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:The best way by Hatta · · Score: 1

      RAID 10 is much safer than RAID 6.

      How do you figure? If you have 6 disks in RAID 6, with 2 redundant drives, you can lose any two drives and fully recover. With RAID10, you can usually recover from a two drive failure, but there's a 1 in 5 chance that the 2nd drive failure will be the mirror of the first failed drive.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:The best way by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Hrm. Already download ad-hoc. May look into the feed thing. Good idea. At $92/month for directv, it is time to let it go and put a nice antenna up instead for passive viewing. The WD TV LIve Plus, btw, is an excellent inexpensive box that can play any format you throw at it. I use one on my main tv, and in my gym and office. I just download to my NAS. I was mounting the NAS via NFS, but UPnP media server works fine as well.

  14. Kill your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, seriously.

    I got rid of mine a few years ago, and I have no idea (not a clue) how I ever had time to watch it.

    It's incredible how much time it takes to watch your TV! In the absence of TV you will devote that time to other pursuits. And *any* other pursuit, including sleeping or picking lint out of your navel, is more valuable to you than watching TV.

    The other thing that happened was that my desensitization to the crap on TV abated. Now, watching TV is torture: I cannot believe how horribly bad it is relative to anything else. I don't know whether it was always that bad and I was used to it, or whether it has *really* gone downhill in the last 5 years.

    For the record, I am probably around average when it comes to productivity, engagement, and intellectual ability: this is not the pronouncement of a Harvard professor, just an ordinary IT manager who is sick of looking at screens when he gets home.

    1. Re:Kill your TV by shiftless · · Score: 2

      The other thing that happened was that my desensitization to the crap on TV abated. Now, watching TV is torture: I cannot believe how horribly bad it is relative to anything else. I don't know whether it was always that bad and I was used to it, or whether it has *really* gone downhill in the last 5 years.

      It was always that bad, and you were just used to it.

      I had the same experience about 3-4 years ago, after having been off the tube for a few years. Ever since I moved out on my own I could not afford cable/satellite nor did I have a particular affinity for it, so I just did without. After a while of not watching, it was shocking to go over to a friend's house and see how much utter garbage fills the airwaves. Television is TRASH, and anyone who abstains for a while can see this clearly. Nowadays hanging out at a TV junkie's house feels a lot like visiting a meth or heroin addict. It's disgusting.

    2. Re:Kill your TV by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's impossible to comprehend until you've tried it, however. Even "good" shows seem it so great after you're no longer under the spell. I came to see the TV as just one huge noise maker that people place right at the center of their lives.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  15. DVD by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    The best way to watch "TV" is to buy DVDs from past eras and watch the shows on your time, not the networks's schedules. This also gets rid of the commercials and only the better ones make it to DVD.

  16. Raspbmc by perles · · Score: 1

    Well, not exactly what you want but I am working on my Raspberry Pi to make it an HTPC. I have a Network Attached Storage (NAS) - well, actually it is a Pogoplug but a real NAS would be better - connected to a Wi-Fi router. I have installed the latest Raspbmc (http://www.raspbmc.com/) in the Raspberry Pi (http://www.raspberrypi.org/), and with a wireless keyboard it works great. The Raspberry Pi have an ethernet card but I am thinking to buy a Wi-Fi dongle and use it instead of wired network.

    1. Re:Raspbmc by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      This all comes down to owning your media vs not owning your media. For those who have purchased and actually own/hold their media, it's not a problem. Constantly relying on the ever-changing landscape of transient content will always be a moving target lacking support for anything slightly off the mainstream.

  17. Watch much sports? by Scottie-Z · · Score: 1

    It is easily feasible to 'cut the cord' provided you are not too demanding in your programming requirements. In any reasonably-large city you can easily pull down all the major networks in HD over the air with a small digital antenna and a pc-HDTV card or equivalent. Quality is reputed to be even better than the quality of HD cable. Many other shows are easily available through your browser at nearly the same time they are broadcast. If you *must* see the latest HBO series, well, then choices are either to bend over and pay, or break the law and fire up the rationalization engine.

    One notable exception is that if you are a big sports fan you will definitely miss live programming on ESPN.

    Me? I've been watching only broadcast TV using Myth for over 10 years. That's $6,000 saved so far, minimum.

  18. XBMC by macemoneta · · Score: 3, Informative

    XBMC on a small 1080p capable system (even a $35 Raspberry Pi will do), XBMC Remote on an Android device as the remote control, and optionally a file server for locally stored content. The library for movies and TV season DVDs. We cut the cord years ago.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  19. Remember TV dinner? by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you could [run Netflix] with a computer as well. Biggest pain would be using a keyboard and mouse

    That's what a tray table is for. You put the wireless keyboard and trackball on the tray while picking a show, and once the show starts, you put them away to make room for your microwave dinner.

    1. Re:Remember TV dinner? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      you could [run Netflix] with a computer as well. Biggest pain would be using a keyboard and mouse

      That's what a tray table is for. You put the wireless keyboard and trackball on the tray while picking a show, and once the show starts, you put them away to make room for your microwave dinner.

      I use a Logitech K400 keyboard. It's a wireless keyboard with touchpad built in. I don't normally like touchpads, but for the application it's perfect. Select a show, then set it down while I watch. It's also great to pass around if you have friends over and they want to show a certain youtube video, etc.

      On my "Media PC" I don't use any fancy software. Just VLC or Media player. I can't stand Media Centre. Though I don't have a tuner card or remote.

    2. Re:Remember TV dinner? by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Computer desk at the foot of the bed. No issues.

    3. Re:Remember TV dinner? by ubrgeek · · Score: 2

      Kids to get up and change the channel when I tell them to.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    4. Re:Remember TV dinner? by nanospook · · Score: 1

      My android app (sony) with voice to text is easy peasy..

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  20. I Actually Prefer Cable + DVR by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I spent a long time without cable watching everything off a hard drive or Netflix, but I'm back to cable + a DVR. I really just love flipping through channels, and having everything instantly on in HD. I felt like watching TV only off Netflix and my hard drive had me making too many of the choices, and I got into a rut. I admit I have weird taste in TV and so maybe it's not for everyone, but cable + DVR is definitely my preference.

    1. Re:I Actually Prefer Cable + DVR by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's the thing I like; finding a show I didn't know about, or a movie is on that like but never would have put onto a wishlist if I only saw it on a web page. Sometimes I just see 5 minutes of something I think will be dumb and am too lazy to change the channel, then I like it and decide to record it.

    2. Re:I Actually Prefer Cable + DVR by DeTech · · Score: 1

      It's good to know you guys don't mind being on the frontline. Just make sure you debrief on what's good.

    3. Re:I Actually Prefer Cable + DVR by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Walking Dead
      Big Bang Theory
      Futurama
      Amy Pond

  21. Perhaps not the most legal option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This may not be considered the best option in some views, but ive found that just downloading tv works a lot better than any of the legitimate services or cable companies. You can generally get rss feeds from most torrent sites and then set keywords so it automatically grabs the stuff you usually watch. You will need to timeshift your programming according to the whims of the encoders and release groups, as someone who hasnt paid for tv subscription in years, I can tell you that is only a very minor inconvienience.

    Supplement that with services such as hulu, and you are good to go.

  22. Unpopular Answer by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    Dish or DirectTV both have great packages and great multi-room DVR systems, mostly without the worry of babysitting your downloads or pissing off your ISP with torrent downloads.

    Similar, Ceton makes a fantastic 4-tuner cable-card that works great with Windows Media Center, albeit after a sometimes difficult setup.  Media Center then integrates nicely with things like Netflix.

    If your goal is to easily watch TV, then keep paying for cable or Dish/Direct and upgrade DVR systems.

    If your goal is to cut the cord, deploy a good internet-enabled Blu-Ray player with DivX/x264 support in each room and get yourself some Netflix.

    1. Re:Unpopular Answer by Teresita · · Score: 1

      We have Directv, but every time I turn around, some network is having a pissing contest with Dish, running ads for viewers to call Dish and demand they keep carrying the channel. And it's not just the Pottery Channel. Right now it's We-TV, but one time it was ABC.

    2. Re:Unpopular Answer by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I would love directv more if the pigfuckers didn't encrypt the stuff stored on the DVR to force you to buy another box or use their crappy software to watch it. It's even a standard UPnP server. They just encrypt the files.

  23. Watch your local team by tepples · · Score: 1

    My only gripe is not having sports access. This year missed NBA completely. :(

    You could always buy a season ticket to watch your local college or D-League team. Yes, I know that's not for everybody, such as someone with a family or someone who follows multiple sports.

    1. Re:Watch your local team by dmiller1984 · · Score: 1

      My only gripe is not having sports access. This year missed NBA completely. :(

      You could always buy a season ticket to watch your local college or D-League team. Yes, I know that's not for everybody, such as someone with a family or someone who follows multiple sports.

      The only issue with this is that many of the professional leagues have blackout restrictions that prevent you from getting their service if you are in the team's local market.

  24. Not Much About Your Needs by crackspackle · · Score: 1

    If all you want to do is cut the cord and don't want to waste time with too many technical details and have lots of money, buy a new television. Most come with DLNA servers built in and all the standalone library devices you may want to add can support it. They also support most of the major streaming providers like Netflix, Amazon, and Youtube. As well, most can do wireless and some even have DVR functionality built in for recording over the air broadcasts.

  25. due to delayed international telecast... by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

    I find the best way is to:
    have a usenet subscription...
    install sabnzbd+ to download 'news' items
    install sickbeard and use it to automatically send new episodes to sabnzbd+
    use xbmc running on a low power computer plugged into your tv to watch any new episodes, you can even set sickbeard up to notify xbmc of when an episode has been downloaded

    --
    -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
  26. Do some research by jj00 · · Score: 2

    1. Write down every feature you want
    2. Write down all the shows you like to watch on a regular basis
    3. Determine the other means of obtaining those shows other than pay tv (Antenna, Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc)
    4. Decide the best choice for you by what features and shows you want

    We went through this couple years ago and settled on a Tivo with an Antenna. We supplement with Netflix and Amazon.

  27. How legit do you want to be? by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AppleTV is nice, but you'll be paying per show (or season).
    Roku is cheap, but not as reliable

    Netflix (on either ATV or Roku) and Hulu (on Roku) are monthly services which have decent selection. I'm not sure if Amazon is on Roku.

    If you're the adventuresome type, don't mind playing fast and loose with the rules (but don't want to get caught), and have a free weekend, you can try and set up the following on a machine you designate as a server:

    sabnzbd - a program to download stuff from the usenet
    sickbeard - a program to find TV shows on usenet
    couch potato - a program to look for movies on usenet (optional)
    jailbreak an ATV2 (they're still out there, right?) and put on either XMBC or, for a little more family friendly (but limited), Plex along with Plex Media Server on your PC.

    You will also want a NZB account, like NZBmatrix ($10 for 10 years? Lifetime? who knows) and a Usenet account. Look for deals on Slickdeals.net - on rare occasions you can pick up an unlimited account for $6/mo. I rarely use more than 100GB of TV in a month, so a 1TB chuck for about $50-60 is also good.

    You tell sickbeard what shows you want it to find, and what your NZB account password is. When it finds the show you want, it passes the info off to sabnzbd (you input your usenet credentials there) which downloads the blocks of the show,decodes it, names it, and puts it into the directory or your choosing. Couch Potato is similar. I'm sure I've gotten something wrong, but after an hour or two of tutorials out there on the net it's not that bad.

    Okay, so that's getting you content - probably over https - is a way that does not expose you to the IP owners of the world like P2P does.

    Once your content is on the computer, you can either point your Roku or AppleTV with XBMC installed to it and start watching. I prefer Plex, and my 9 yo and wife found it super easy.

    We cut the cable (well, sat) back in January and don't miss it. Oh - I do have antennas for OTA reception for local weather and news.

    Using usenet isn't exactly legit, but it's also very, very low risk as you are never uploading or sharing any content with others. It's a nice system if you've got a slower connection, too, as you are downloading the files - not streaming them. It means a day or so delay for shows, but you never have to worry about buffering.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:How legit do you want to be? by Tanath · · Score: 1

      It means a day or so delay for shows, but you never have to worry about buffering.

      What? Shows are out in less than an hour. Sometimes as little as around 10 mins after airing.

    2. Re:How legit do you want to be? by needsomemoola · · Score: 2

      This is very interesting. Thanks for posting. I think I might try this. I love playing with ways to NOT pay for watching commercials. I'm much more willing to pay for content (at reasonable pricing) w/o ads being forced down my face.

      --
      "That'll never compile."
    3. Re:How legit do you want to be? by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      What? Shows are out in less than an hour. Sometimes as little as around 10 mins after airing.

      ...and with a slow internet connection, they can be on your hard drive the next day.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    4. Re:How legit do you want to be? by yabos · · Score: 1

      Yep, this is exactly what I set up. I haven't used CouchPotato but SickBeard + sab + WDTV Live Streaming Player works amazingly well. There's not enough on TV to justify spending the ~$100/m that it takes to actually get the shows you want to watch. The problem is, the shows you DO want to watch are usually fairly limited, but it's spread out over so many channels and packages it costs a literal fortune.

      Right now I think this is too complicated for the general public which is why the cable and satellite companies can get away with the outrageous charges for TV.
      The legit services like iTunes are ok but still too costly in my opinion. Plus I don't care about owning the TV episodes since I rarely would watch them a second time.

    5. Re:How legit do you want to be? by blumpy · · Score: 1

      There's no delay, in fact on the west coast we get shows usually 2 hours before they air locally because they've already aired on the east coast and get posted on usenet nearly instantly.

    6. Re:How legit do you want to be? by Tanath · · Score: 1

      I didn't know you could still get a connection that slow. Sorry.

  28. Re:Television is a prison for your mind. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    No it isn't. Ignorance is the prison of the mind.

    I lie how you think learning about math and science is some sort of prison.

    Not every one sits around watching shows about fat couple with a nagging wife.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Pirate it and don't feel guilty. Paying is immoral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only person that thinks it's absurd that I can purchase a 100 megabit downstream link from my cable provider but can't watch a particular TV show without being forced to purchase a 70 dollar/month (with 2 year commitment) bundled package? (From the same company)

    I have a connection to a network where I can grab data from anywhere on the planet, but TV shows come via an obsolete channel switched bitstream on a schedule designed to extract advertising dollars in exchange for my valuable time.

    The media companies have spoken, and they aren't interested in selling me content. So I don't buy it. The few shows worth watching are available at the usual places and you can watch them at your leisure. Paying for content sends the wrong message. When you pay, you're buying 20 minutes of advertising. When you pay, you're telling them you're willing to sit there in front of the TV when they tell you to.

    Given the exploitative nature of traditional TV packaging, they should be paying you to watch. Not the other way around.

  30. Free is good by fa2k · · Score: 2

    I run MythTV, and it's pretty nice (can be combined with a storage server, and in my case, a workstation). Still feels like recording songs off the radio, but the quality is good and the TV industry are only just now starting to provide fair alternatives. (the reason i have a DVR is to watch stuff when I want. Let me know when you can give me that with streaming, without arbitrarily pulling content.) Mythtv is a bit "temperamental" in my experience, and it provides a reasonable interface that could have been better. You can use mythtv with over-the-air digital TV and supplement with other services if necessary

    1. Re:Free is good by Static · · Score: 1

      This is what I do. I've got it all on one PC that knows how to turn itself on and off at the right times outputting to a projector. I find I can usually rely on the EPG and look through upcoming programs every once in a while. I do forget what nights things air on...

  31. No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by presidenteloco · · Score: 2

    I haven't had a TV for 15 years or so.

    Strangely, I find myself able to form my own political viewpoints and impression of what's going on.

    Netflix and iTunes for movies and commercial-free old tv series. News sites for news.

    Go to the pub to watch big sports events like Stanley cup and World Cup soccer (the vibe is better than the living room anyway).

    Olympics etc come online now too. Not a fan of (the mostly non-foot variety of) football, so no problem at all there with weekly sports viewing.

    Only thing is, Canadian Netflix and iTunes movie and tv show selection sucks sucks sucks due to separate licensing agreements for the content compared to in US. It's like spending an hour in a video rental store trying to find a movie that you haven't seen that actually wasn't straight to DVD. Most of their selection is "wasn't good enough for the big screen" crap or something from pre-1965. Almost bad enough to make you want to get a TV or a US proxy net connection and fake US zip code and US bank VISA card, but not quite.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      "Strangely, I find myself able to form my own political viewpoints and impression of what's going on."

      smuggest sentence of the day award goes to you!

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    2. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

      Only thing is, Canadian Netflix and iTunes movie and tv show selection sucks sucks sucks due to separate licensing agreements for the content compared to in US. It's like spending an hour in a video rental store trying to find a movie that you haven't seen that actually wasn't straight to DVD. Most of their selection is "wasn't good enough for the big screen" crap or something from pre-1965. Almost bad enough to make you want to get a TV or a US proxy net connection and fake US zip code and US bank VISA card, but not quite.

      Don't need to go quite that far, signing in to your Netflix Canada account while tunneling through a US-based VPN to get a US IP address is enough to get access to the US catalogue. The way Netflix has their streaming service set up all of their streaming subscribers get access to all of the content available in the country you're logging in from, which means if you're travelling internationally you can still have access to SOMETHING. It also means if someone wanted to get around their region restrictions a VPN will do it.

    3. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      > I haven't had a TV for 15 years or so.
      > ...Netflix ...iTunes...Stanley Cup...soccer...Olympics...

      But you still watch television.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Strangely, I find myself able to form my own political viewpoints and impression of what's going on.

      Not strange at all, considering the amount of propaganda and lies on the airwaves, on every single channel!

    5. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by mallyn · · Score: 1
      No TV for 34 years.

      Here in Portland, we have Movie Madness, a video store with perhaps the largest selection of titles on the west coast. If I want to watch something (and most often it's a classic like Sound of Music), I go there and rent a dvd. Four days for three dollars.

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    6. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Wow, 15 years! Did you hear that Jean Chrétien might not be re-elected? Pretty cool huh?

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    7. Re:No TV, Canadian Netflix and news sites by jbr439 · · Score: 1

      unblock-us.com - better price than a US VPN and easy to set up. You get US Netflix, BBC iplayer, etc

  32. you can call the cable to get a new box or switch by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    you can call the cable to get a new box or switch to a dish or DIRECTV.

  33. Re:A Vast Wasteland by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im so tired of this.

    I leaned a new lick watching peter frampton last week. Was that a waste?
    My kids and I had a discussion regarding quantum physics because of something we watched on TV. Was that a waste?
    My kids no more about our solar system then most kids their age because of some of the television we watch. Is that bad?
    My kids want to build things over the summer because of something they say on TV. Is that bad?
    My daughter likes doing experiments because of mythbusters. Is that bad?

    I have used TV tio teach my kids about advertising shenanigans. Was that bad?

    I could list a 1000 ways TV is good.
    Is there stuff on TV that is horrible drivel and nonsense? yes. But to dismiss all of TV because of that is no different then burning down all the library's because they have a copy of twilight.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. Mix and match by MoGrapher · · Score: 2

    I was in your exact position (minus the kids) in January, and I settled on a bit of a hybrid system. I have a Blu-Ray player to play my existing (past) movie collection. For Netflix and some Hulu Plus streaming I have a Roku HD; it also supports Amazon Prime and a plethora of other channels that I haven't dug into much. For everything else I have a spare 35' HDMI cable (www.monoprice.com) that I connect to my laptop, add 2.4ghz mouse and keyboard and it's a very robust solution.

    The additional thing to note is that all of this is supported by a Comcast internet-only plan. If you take the raw coaxial cable coming into the house before your modem and split it to be sent to your TV, you will get all of the major networks in HD and a lot of other content as well. This fulfills any "live TV" watching we want to do, such as sports or reality-tv.

    The conversion to this solution cost me about $200 in cables, the Roku, etc., but my monthly fees for internet and entertainment media have dropped from $130 to $58. So it has already payed for itself.

    -MoG

    1. Re:Mix and match by MoGrapher · · Score: 1

      I should also mention that I picked up one of the LG "Smart" TVs. It connects to my PC via the WiFi network, and plays any videos I have using Plex Media Server. It's a convenient system.

      -MoG

    2. Re:Mix and match by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Maybe on Comcast. When i turned off Cable TV, they sent a tech out to put a filter on the line so i get nothing. they tried charging me a service fee for it too.....

      --
      Good-bye
  35. My Dear Old Aunt Enna by linuxwrangler · · Score: 2

    I have an antenna. I get better quality than many people I know with dish or cable. I spend more than adequate time in front of the idiot box as is - why tempt myself with more.

    There are a few premium shows I want to watch - Mad Men and Sopranos for example. But I've watched entire series on DVD for less than the cost of a month of cable.

    Savings depends on your plan but compared to many of my friends and neighbors I am saving over a thousand dollars a year in subscription fees alone not counting the cost of the box and the power to run it (many DVRs are power vampires on standby). That pays for a week or more camping at a national park. Or a weekend at Disneyland.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  36. Boxee Box by morari · · Score: 2

    Cut the cord! Subscription television is ridiculously overpriced and saddled with more advertising than content. There is rarely even anything on worth watching. Set yourself up a new media box (Boxee, Roku, GoogleTV, custom HTPC, etc) and enjoy everything you want without accidentally slipping into channel surfer mode. You'll enjoy life a lot more the less television you take in. :)

    What should go with? I love my Boxee Box. It's quick and easy to set up. It gives you that "set top" feel. It has great options for local and network playback. It has a lot of options for streaming as well (but with some notable exceptions, like Hulu and, I believe, Amazon). The interface is absolutely beautiful and the remote control is even kind of cool. Couple it with a basic Netflix subscription and a health dose of torrents and you'll be all set.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  37. Re:OTA, Netflix by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Informative

    I pirate Top Gear; the BBC really ought to get with the program and offer foreigners a way to pay for series or subscriptions.

    You mean, like Netflix? Most of the BBC series I watch are on it....

  38. Re:Whoa I just thought of something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What you imagine: The kids pick up several productive hobbies and grow up to be sharp-witted citizens free of the fetters of mass advertising.

    What would actually happen: The kids pocket your $50/month, go watch TV at their friends' houses, and learn that their parents are starry-eyed idiots who are easily taken advantage of.

  39. Re:if I lived where antennas are not allowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the U.S., this issue was resolved by the FCC a long time ago. You are always allowed to have an antenna no matter what an HOA might tell you.

  40. Re:I Actually Prefer Cable + DVRD by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    Ditto. Cable + TiVo here. I get to watch things live, bounce things to the other TiVo in the house, and if there's not something on cable TV then it's easy enough to find something through Netflix or Amazon Instant Video.

    Now if there was just a way to watch iTunes movies on a TiVo, I'd be set.

  41. Antenna not allowed? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    If you can't put up an external antenna, put one in the attic or even an outer upstairs closet works almost as well.

  42. Evolving Internet-Only setup by needsomemoola · · Score: 2

    I've wondered about the best way to do this as well. I refuse to pay for a service that makes me watch commercials (cable/sat TV). IMHO advertisers should be paying cable companies to give away cable access to people who want it, or there should not be commercials if I'm paying. Why do I need to pay to be advertised to? I'm sure it's more complex, but I just don't care.

    My setup has evolved over time. I have a 30 Mbps Internet connection, a 55" LED LG mounted to the wall in my living room, and a mid-line BD/surround system. The evolving part is the media source of course. I started with a small tower with Windows 7 running on it. It let me play my Windows-based games on my big screen and I could stream Netflix, Hulu, iTunes, CDs, DVDs, Blu-Ray, and my questionably acquired collection of movies and TV series.

    Disclaimer: I know from reading this site frequently that most people here don't like Apple. The disclaimer part is that I just don't care. My views are based on my experience.

    Eventually I decided it was taking up too much space, making too much noise, and taking up too much electricity (didn't want to shut it down because takes a while to boot). Over the last couple years I've picked up an iPhone and an iPad, so as a natural progression I decided to try the Apple TV. It has some nice features such as being 1080p, having AirPlay (lets me stream music and pictures from my iDevices, and lets me mirror the screen on my iPad, some games work with it too), and a superb Netflix interface (much better than most App-enabled media appliances). I've picked up a few TV series and a few movies and they play beautiful video and sound. Since most people seem to have iDevices nowadays, it's nice for friend and family that come over to be able to share pictures and videos and such from their phones on the TV.

    The problem with Apple TV is that it's the usually Apple-walled-garden situation. You're limited to the services they provide (for now). I suspect they will open the Apple TV up for app dev soon (like they did for the iPhone when the Appe Store was announced) based on the direction the interface is heading. Once that happens it may be a solve-all solution for my needs. But until then, there is one major problem with it... there's no way to play my video collection.

    To fix this, eventually I picked up a Boxee from Best Buy (made by D-Link... not my favorite brand). So far it has been a fantastic solution. It streams my video collection on my LAN flawlessly, streams Netflix (interface is not as polished as Apple's), Pandora, Vudu (decent service), Hulu, and many others. There's an app repository that you can get quite a few apps from, and the ability to add custom repos if you'd like. The remote is not a simple and beautifully made sliver of aluminum like the Apple TV remote, but it's far more functional. It has a full QWERTY keyboard on the back, it's not directional (works in any orientation, so not IR I guess), and the front is a simple interface. The Boxee also support AirPlay for audio and video. I haven't had luck with doing any screen mirroring.

    I've only just recently discovered the Vudu service on it. It's owned by Walmart and it's pretty nifty. I don't want to be an advertisement for it but if you go the Boxee route you should definitely check out Vudu.

    Over all the Boxee does 99% of what I want and maybe everything that you would want. You can even add an antenna attachment so you can stream local broadcast channels. The Apple TV is nicer in design (smaller, sleeker, cheaper), interface, remote (iDevices can be remotes too), and overall polish. Once they start having apps for it and stuff like Oplayer and Hulu show up on it, I don't think I'll need the Boxee anymore.

    I've also considered the Roku, but I haven't had a reason to look at it since I got the Boxee.

    --
    "That'll never compile."
    1. Re:Evolving Internet-Only setup by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      I know its a hack but for my own video collection i use a Synology NAS and their ipad app to stream content to my apple TV via airplay. Works great

      --
      Good-bye
  43. Wait, what? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whenever I hear about something good I check it out, but it just seems like shit to me. Game of thrones? Lord of the rings with tits.

    I've had absolutely no desire whatsoever to watch Game of Thrones. Then you had to come here and describe it as the single most awesome concept ever. Can you really think of anything better than Lord of the Rings with tits??

    Now I have to check it out.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by ThePeices · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you really think of anything better than Lord of the Rings with tits??

      Lord of the Rings with Tits and Bacon?

    2. Re:Wait, what? by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Funny

      The one thing about Game of Thrones that most people who are just becoming fans don't get - EVERYBODY DIES! If it follows the books, absolutely every character you find youself liking, every one that becomes a favorite with millions of viewers, will die, generally by extreme violence. Imagine if you were really getting into original Trek, and somewhere about in the middle of season 2, Kirk gets his head exploded by a sniper disruptor, and McCoy has a heart attack trying to save him. Three weeks latrer, Checkov is dead, then by the end of the season Spock has been graphically fed feet first into a Vulcan rice picker. Maybe you thought 'City on the Edge of Forever' was couragious by showing sometimes nice people die, but now, someone you like is snuffing it every single episode. They bring back the Romulan commander you found yourself sneakily admiring, just to kill him off two minutes later. Klingons start naming their warriors with other sounds than K because that seems to be bad luck the way they are ALL being poisoned before they can get to command positions. The enterprise returns to the world of 'Shore Leave' just so people can permanent-die there this time. By the end of season 3, Uhura, Scotty, Sulu, Rand, and the Enterprise itself are all violently dead, and so is everyone on most of the planets they visited. Oh, and every transporter malfunction ever was shown with bright red blood spraying neck high over all the walls of the room, and it turns out photon torpedos destroy spaceships and equipment, but leave their crews naked and alive, floating in vacuum until they pop like in Total Recall.
                That's where Game of Thrones is headed. Personally, I'm thinking they will kill off one of the really popular characters and then be terribly surprised when that one becomes the straw that broke three million viewers backs and their audience share suddenly drops 50% in a week, and then the week after is worse, and all of the sudden they are needing to cancel it because they are down to less than 400,000 viewers per episode and getting a million pieces of hate mail a week. I honestly expect the series to self distruct if it trys to remain true to the novels.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    3. Re:Wait, what? by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Seriously, it's embarrassing to watch. The long, lingering shots of nudity are nothing short of soft porn and contribute utterly zero to the story. I got through one and a half episodes in the hope it would pick up, but it showed no such sign.

      I know there's a lot of people here who like to watch that sort of thing, but there's an entire genre for that, on dedicated websites and in the little side-rooms in video stores. Can't we keep it there?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Wait, what? by bmo · · Score: 3, Funny

      >graphic details about extremely violent deaths of Star Trek characters, especially about Spock.

      I believe you've spent way too much thinking about this for far too long.

      Tell me about your mother.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:Wait, what? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      They could kill of 99% of the cast and turn it into "The Tyrion Lanaster Show" and I'd still watch it. I think once he's dead, I'll be skipping the rest.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:Wait, what? by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      The amount of death is seriously exaggerated.

      Out of a roster of about maybe 30 characters you follow, I think only, hmm, 3 have died or something along those lines.
      The tendency is also that characters seemingly die BUT WAIT, THEY DIDN'T!

      Spoiler alert:

      Ned Stark dies.
      Theon Greyjoy seems to die but doesn't, he just gets tortured and broken down into Reek.
      Robb Stark dies.
      Catelyn Stark dies but returns as a semi-undead monster.
      You believe Arya gets killed when she is knocked out and not heard of again for a long time, but that is false.
      You hear Davos is dead but you later learn that this was just a rumour (in part upheld by him).
      Maybe Brienne dies, can't remember, so bloody uninteresting.
      You are uncertain about a load of characters, however, they always show up again since she doesn't kill people off-scene, every death has to be dramatic.

      So, yup 3 dead, one risen again.
      WHAT A DEATH TOLL!

    7. Re:Wait, what? by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      Tyrion and Daenarys are the two characters I think are the most unkillable I think, their functions are irreplaceable to the story.

    8. Re:Wait, what? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Sounds like 'Oz' from HBO. Seems like just about everyone died after a 2 or 3 episode arc. Sometimes seemed like realism, sometimes seemed like "not sure what to do with this character, have him shivved next episode"

    9. Re:Wait, what? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The only two chracters I know of that I genuinely got to like and actually died were Ned and Robb. But that's probably because the focus on the Starks from the outset was an elaborate misdirection. Most likely the two key characters will end up being Daenerys and Jon Snow. (Yes, I've read all the books, including Dance.)

      That said, the two actual deaths were completely unexpected at the time. I love those twists.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    10. Re:Wait, what? by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      That midget they show in the commercial has kept me from watching it.

    11. Re:Wait, what? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      GRRM has managed to humilliate both of them in awful ways in the last book.

      I swear that GRRM just asks himself every time "How else can I make this character's life miserable, and piss off the fans?"

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    12. Re:Wait, what? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Jon is probably dead too

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    13. Re:Wait, what? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Because I don't want to spoil it for anyone who hasn't read all the books, I'll point out that I did say I've read all of them. And no, I don't believe Jon is dead, at all.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    14. Re:Wait, what? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      No, we can't keep it there, there is no shame in the human body, none at all.
      And the nudity is actually part of the story, the books are pretty raunchy as well.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  44. Free TV is best by dhalsim2 · · Score: 1
    I could never bring myself to pay for TV. It seems like such a huge, freakin' waste of money. I have no problem with paying a lot up front for a one-time fixed cost, but I don't want a subscription. Here's my set up:
    • MediaPC with 1 TB HDD, HDMI out, S/PDIF out, and two tuner cards using Windows 7, ~$400
    • the best antenna out there, the Winegard HD7698P, ~$150 (although I think I went overboard here. If I were to do it again, I'd go for a more moderate antenna.)
    • two Redbox kiosks within walking distance, $1/movie
  45. dvd player with netflix built in by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    We have a Roku box on my wife's TV, and upstairs in the media room we have a DVD player that has Netflix built in and has a USB port on the front that accepts a thumb drive with, you know, a video on it. Should you have a video on a thumb drive for some reason... This combination plus a conventional antenna (remember those?) so wife can watch football (she's a fanatic), pretty much takes care of our video needs.

    Advantages are, netflix video service is cheap, the occasional DVD can be played upstairs (Friday is pizza-and-movie-night) and we can still do off-air viewing if we really wanted to (almost never). I used to pay something like $120 a month for TV, with two set-top boxes, the one in the media room with DVR capabilities (which never really worked all that well) and then a PC running Windows Media Center upstairs (what a piece of carp that was), and I tell ya -- finding an appliance to do all of that without having to pay for cable TV was the greatest thing ever.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  46. ATV with XBMC by DesertBlade · · Score: 1

    Have 2 ATV with XBMC running on them with Bluehosts plugins. Can stream Hulu and many network shows straight from the internet most at HD. There are ways to use sickbeard and usenet to get shows automatically but I hardly ever need to. When the networks change protocols to break my setup, I go back to using sickbeard, till the great devs get the codec working with the new protocol. Been using this for 18+ months and have no plans on going back,

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
  47. OTA HDTV is awesome by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Cable TV is almost entirely repeats of OTA broadcast TV shows, and a flood of low-quality "reality" shows. And with the proliferation of cable channels over the years, the content is continually spread ever-thinner. So you have 5 "discovery" channels, and 4 "history" channels, great! ...except that all the content which was formerly on ONE channel is now spread across 4 or 5, and to fill time each channel just has the same 3 hours (of repeats) on each day, playing in a loop. Really, it's incredibly sad.

    Honestly, OTA broadcast networks had the formula figured out, many decades ago, and it works just as well today as it did back then. Whatever you like to watch on cable, you can find hours of it on the broadcast networks, every week. That's where all the halfway-decent original shows are developed and air, that's where the most-watched sporting events air, that's where all the best science, history and nature shows air, that's where the best news programs are produced, etc.

    Ever since OTA TV went digital (and HD) the "free" option is now the highest quality, all-around. It's also them most convenient option, by far, since you don't have to wait for the cable guy when you move, you can hook-up an unlimited number of TVs and other devices, and there are no restrictions on recording or time-shifting the content. If you're paying for cable, you're really paying $60+/month for the priviledge of lower picture quality and massive inconvenience, and only getting an extra 20% of content out of it that you wouldn't get OTA.

    My recomendation... Get a good antenna, and buy or put together a DVR. DVI or HDMI to the TV, and all you need is a $50 ATSC tuner from Hauppauge (IR remote incuded) to make your Myth/Freevo/whatever -box complete. The picture quality will be perfect, and the flexibility is just amazing, as you can add as many tuner cards as your DVR box can physically accomodate, you can watch pre-recorded or live TV from one of the tuners on ANY internet-connected device (eg., my phone), as well as any DVD/Blu-rays you rip to the device, etc.

    Now, OTA TV can certainly fill your viewing/entertainment needs, but this can be complimented with the also-free Hulu Desktop to get some cable TV shows, old shows, and junk movies, as well as a (cheap) subscription to Netflix for your movie viewing, and possibly their streaming video selection if you have a compatible device (Linux isn't supported).

    This has been my setup for the past 5+ years, and I couldn't be happier. My only concern is moving to an area where I'm too far from the broadcast towers. For anyone in that situation, I see Dish Network's $15/month "Welcome Package" seems perfect, you just need to find a receiver that can be controlled via USB ala Directv, or similar, since depending on IR blasters sucks royally, and I suppose one of those component video capture boxes.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  48. Re:if I lived where antennas are not allowed by Scyber · · Score: 2

    Not entirely true. The FCC ruled that you can't be restricted from installing an antenna (or dish) in "exclusive use" areas. For condos or apartments, often the entire exterior of the building is considered a shared usage area. I have even seen some standalone homes that the exterior was considered a "shared usage" space (mostly in senior communities where the exterior upkeep is completely taken care of by the HOA). You can still install antenna indoors, but that may not be sufficient depending on your region.

  49. Roku + Playon.tv by jdkc4d · · Score: 2

    The Roku is great, I've had one since just before the version 2 came out. I love that thing. Netflix + Amazon Prime gives me most everything. Then a piece of software called Playon.tv allows me to pull streams through the old windows box in the corner, transcode, and stream to the roku. Any file that you can watch in VLC, you can stream through playon to your roku...though it does seem to have some problems with certain types of mkv files.

  50. Re:Whoa I just thought of something! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Sorry to break it to you like that, Flanders.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  51. Apple TV and Netflix by berj · · Score: 2

    I haven't had cable in years. I've got an Apple TV 2 plugged in to my TV and it's fantastic. We watch a ton of stuff on Netflix. I also download full seasons of some of the shows I watch from iTunes. A bunch of other stuff I watch on the various TV stations' apps on my iPad (which I could Airplay to the TV but I don't). It's just about a perfect setup for the type and amount of TV that we watch.

  52. Re:if I lived where antennas are not allowed by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I have even seen some standalone homes that the exterior was considered a "shared usage" space (mostly in senior communities where the exterior upkeep is completely taken care of by the HOA).

    They can NEVER stop you from installing an antenna or dish ON YOUR ROOF.

    You can still install antenna indoors, but that may not be sufficient depending on your region.

    The only time an antenna indoors is insufficient would be if you don't have a window facing the direction of the towers, and you're in a fringe area (30+ miles away), or if you DO have a window, but you're more than 50+ miles away. Otherwise, I'd always expect a strong enough signal with a big damn antenna.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  53. Cable + MythTV by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Comcast cable box for cable channels.
    HDHomerun for OTA channels.
    Hauppauge HD PVR for capture from Comcast box.
    Firewire for Comcast box control (because HD PVR IR transmitter is broken under Linux).

    MythTV for watching/recording/skipping commercials.
    MythTV frontend-only setup on a laptop/in other rooms.

    (optionally) HDFury to deal with HDMI outputs (though Comcast boxes have usable component output).
    (optionally) Bluray player with Netflix and other things that don't work on Linux.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  54. Best way 2012 by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    The best way to watch TV is -and always has been- while being thrown out of the window.

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
    1. Re:Best way 2012 by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I saw that show, but the ending wasn't too good.

    2. Re:Best way 2012 by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      You, or the TV?

  55. We do antenna and two TiVos by enjar · · Score: 1

    We pick up broadcast TV using a HDTV antenna I built myself. (google GH10 antenna plans, or try some of the cheaper/easier ones depending on how far you are from the tower). We have been TiVo fans since 2001. Although yes, it is (gasp) paying for something, we got the lifetime subscription option so no monthly bills. It hooks up to Netflix and Amazon (although not Prime Instant .... grrr).

    We get series we want to watch through amazon that download to the TiVo like magic. Although we (gasp) pay for them, it's vastly cheaper than what we used to pay for cable. We also got the amazon visa card an fund some of the subscriptions through amazon points (we do pay it off every month, too)

    We have also been picking up a lot of dvds (especially the kids shows) at the library, which is a double bonus because you don't have to pay for them and also they go back to the library so you don't have to watch Dora Saves the Mermaids a billion times (unless it's on Netflix)

    Biggest gripe: No Game of Thrones streaming on Amazon (cue The Oatmeal).

    I also do thank the FCC for requiring local broadcast of all NFL games for the local team ... even the ones on the money grubbing NFL network or ESPN.

  56. WDTV (or Boxee) + HDD + Netflix (streaming & d by nwoolls · · Score: 2

    In my experience either the WDTV or Boxee box are going to be your best bang-for-the-buck when it comes to doing both online media (Netflix, Hulu, Spotify) and playing back most types of local media (mp3, mkv, m4v, avi, etc). I've tried both and I think the WDTV is edges out the Boxee Box.

    Given a WDTV and an large external harddrive, you can start by using MakeMKV and Handbrake (both free) to rip all your current DVD's and Blu-rays. If you were so inclined, you could probably also borrow and rip friends' collections as well, though this wouldn't be legal.

    From there, if you were also so inclined, you could pick up a DVD or Blu-Ray subscription from Netflix to go with the streaming subscription. I've heard the same software works pretty well with their discs too.

    That doesn't get into downloading movies from Usenet or torrents, which is also an option.

    As others have mentioned, the real "problem" is how this is all presented to you, the user. If you cut the chord, you are now going to be picking and choosing each movie and TV show you watch. It's a choice, rather than having a bunch of stuff thrown at you for you to just leave on. It may seem minor, but in practice it's a noticeable difference in how you consume media.

  57. Best Way To Watch TV In 2012? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    1. Don't.
    Seriously. Fuck TV. It's a wasteland.

    2. IF you must, find stuff online. The important point is to not watch commercials. TV shows are not "shows" in and of themselves. They are simply vehicles to keep your attention between commercials. The ones that do that well they keep, the ones that don't, get cancelled. If you watch stuff without sitting through the commercials, then you are gutting the industry, which deserves to die for being such a craptastic devastation of the modern mind. Jerry Mander" nailed it hard decades ago.

    3. Make your own. It's a lot of fun and requires very little money.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  58. Cutting the cable is like open source software by sticky.pirate · · Score: 1
    There's always something to watch, but it might not be exactly what you're looking for.

    I've got a mix of over-the-air, a Roku serving YouTube, and Netflix streaming, and the non-plus version of Hulu on my laptop. It's not bad, I'm entertained, but the selection isn't all that great and about half of the time I say "Oh, I think I'd like to watch $X" but I have to settle for $Y. I don't watch a whole lot of television to begin with, so it's not that big of a deal for me.

    If you are a serious TV watcher (I'm not) and don't want to torrent (I don't), I would recommend at a minimum Hulu or Hulu Plus (I've never used the 'Plus' version), Netflix streaming and DVD service.

  59. Re:A Vast Wasteland by shiftless · · Score: 1

    I leaned a new lick watching peter frampton last week. Was that a waste?
    My kids and I had a discussion regarding quantum physics because of something we watched on TV. Was that a waste?
    My kids no more about our solar system then most kids their age because of some of the television we watch. Is that bad?
    My kids want to build things over the summer because of something they say on TV. Is that bad?
    My daughter likes doing experiments because of mythbusters. Is that bad?

    And in the process how many lies, propaganda, and advertisements did you expose your mind and your kids' minds to?

    What more productive things could you have done with that time besides sit in front of a glowing tube?

  60. How do you all watch TV? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    We don't all watch TV.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  61. Cutting the Cord by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    We dumped our DirecTV after a 2 year contract last year. We use a Roku and have a Netflix and Hulu Plus account. I also had an Amazon Prime account so that automatically gives us the free streaming that was added last year. But the content is largely the same as Netflix so we only really use Amazon when we actually want to buy something. We also subscribe to Mog for music.

    That's about $22 per month and we can watch or listen to as much as we like. That's about $100 less than I used to pay for a premium satellite package. When we want something random, I play music with the Pandora / Slacker / or Shoutcast channels. When I want news, I just put on Democracy Now.

    But it isn't all perfect. You need to be willing to give up some of the benefits of cable / satellite and really learn how to make the most of the Roku. There will be shows that you might want to watch that (legally) will not be available for another year or so. There are a lot of streaming channels that you can't even use yet without a cable subscription (like HBO Go). Amid the myriad of crap that is on TV, there are a handful of shows that you might miss. Ultimately, they make it to Netflix or Hulu but you just have to wait it out.

    That said, if you can dig through these streaming services, you will find things that you like. Many things that you might wonder why you hadn't seen them when they'd aired on TV. There is a lot of value in the current streaming offerings but there are still a lot of things that are missing. It will be a few years before streaming TV becomes the norm and people forget about cable completely.

    If you can learn to live and watch TV in a different way that you have, then Roku (or similar) can be a great alternative to traditional cable or satellite. If you rely heavily on TV then you may be really disappointed. I've considered the cord-cutting experience to be somewhat life changing. We don't spend much time in front of the TV anymore. But we still generally find quality material to whatch when we do. It can take some adjustment and experiementation, but can be worthwhile and a substantial money-saver.

  62. What I did by guruevi · · Score: 2

    - I have an HDHomeRun which has two tuners which can individually receive any feed on either unencrypted cable or free OTA.
    - I have a Mac Mini running XBMC. It really is the simplest and cheapest way of doing it, no messing with getting HDMI to work (works with audio out of the box).
    - I have Hulu, Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, TED, Pandora plugins running on XBMC as well as Ted (The Episode Downloader) with Transmission
    - HDTV passes audio through digitally to my receiver (optional)
    - Attached a 2TB WD Passport to it, USB powered (optional depending on the amount of content you have)
    - Get AirServer if you want your Mini to also receive your iPad/iPhone content over AirPlay (optional)

    The things to look out for:
    - Make sure your Mac Mini does not go to sleep. It uses minimal power but I have an actual Apple TV in the bedroom and 3-4 laptops so it has to remain on to be able to share content also, I want it to get content online. The remote control does wake it up so YMMV
    - Make sure nothing interrupts your XBMC process (pop ups etc). Make your user not an admin (you won't get interrupted by software updates and the like), login automatically, start the application automatically, make the user get a minimal Finder, uninstall unnecessary software. I'm still working on some of the details but most of the popup stuff is disabled. I am going to create a script that automatically restarts XBMC because it does crash once in a while. You can use Cocktail to disable a lot of things.
    - Connect your media center to your ethernet if possible if you're going to have multiple devices use content. WiFi (even 5GHz 802.11n) is still too flaky for continuous HD quality in my area

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  63. Re:A Vast Wasteland by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Do they have TV programmes that help with typing?

    I kid, I kid.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  64. Why not Free TV? by tsfrankie · · Score: 1

    With my youngest child graduated from High School, I felt free to let my inner geek out and save $$. Out with the Dish, and in with Free. I installed an antenna, on a 30' mast with a directional motor and power booster. I ran cable to each TV. Then in the living room and bedrooms, I installed Happague TV tuner cards into Win 7-64 bit PC's. With Windows media player, and an hour or so setup, I now have DVR features on each and all the major networks along with some funny ones, like RTV, ThisTV, and CoolTV, (who knew, right?). Netflix is built into media center, and with Hulu+, I am getting much more for less. Most Stations broadcast 2 or 3 channels now, with the main one in HD. Most are 1080i, and uncompressed so you get awesome quality that Dish or Charter only dream of. Others at 720p are still better than the compressed signal you get from any provider. Weather? No problem yet, and that's though several awesome thunderstorms. As for snowstorms well, in time I will discover. So living in central Michigan, I can get up to 47 stations. To eliminate repeats (I mean how many pbs/nbs/abc/fox/cw.etc do I really need?) and some I have no use for (TCT, and other single issue religious stations) I still have 32. Media center downloads program info for free, and I schedule DVR same as dish, just better quality. I also bought some infrared remotes cheap off Amazon. So, yeah, if I get squezzed financially I can drop netflix and Hulu+, but still enjoy the rest as it is FREE! And the hardware is paid for and owned by me, so no rental fees or anything. If I knew it was this good before now, I would have done this years ago and saved a bundle. I hope this helps!

    --
    The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderate
    1. Re:Why not Free TV? by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest a bicycle? :)

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  65. Off-the-air DVR by LandGator · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/Channel-Master-CM-7000PAL-Digital-Recorder/product-reviews/B0033TJPJW and http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-video-recorders-dvrs/channel-master-cm-7000pal/4505-6474_7-34142156.html describe an over-the-air DVR with no ongoing fees. If you have decent digital reception, you can get your locals that way, and distribute that signal over CAT-5 or coax to the other sets in the household.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  66. No, why? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't like it use the remote buddy. Very simple.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  67. Ah, the new luddites. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is frankly embarrasing that a modern individual can say wiht a straight face that TV sucks.

    Maybe you suck at organizing your time, if you invest 5 minutes a week to find good programmes there is no excuse for TV to suck in an era of hundreds of channels, constant re-runs, film directors and actors working on TV and access to foreign channels (wherever you are: wide your bloody horizons).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Ah, the new luddites. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      No, it sucks. In fact, it's evil.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3NBEurnIqY

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    2. Re:Ah, the new luddites. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      um.. wow. your post reads like someone defending a lost child from a predator. maybe you are afraid your life would be empty without it.. that's sad.

      1. the interface of tv is archiac.. these days, all tv programs should be available on demand, esp for the price demanded by providers. I shouldn't have to bother with 'recording' a stream at certain times, or putting up with commercials at these prices.

      2. reruns - can be entertaining at times, but really, this feeds into #1..reruns are an anachronism.

      3. watching film directors and actors talk about themselves is decidedly NOT interesting...it's even less interesting than watching them act in the tiring repetitious soap opera/sitcom/drama and now 'reality tv' formats over and over and over.

      4. foreign channels are usually in languages I don't know well...and really, what are they saying that's much different? I'm sure the politics differ in that they speak things that will benefit their towns/states/countries, just like foxnews and cnn do for the US. Big deal, no surprise. otherwise, they're human beings with the same base desires, making their sitcoms/soaps/dramas and reality tv formats similar.. any differences do not make or break tv for me. the format is just tired.

      5. you're telling me to widen my horizons? there's more to life than television..widen yours. if being modern means I have to like the dreck passing off as entertainment, then I guess I'm not modern. oh well.

  68. Frankenbox by yotto · · Score: 1

    I cobbled together my own solution. I bought a $200 government auction pc (nothing special and this was 3 years ago so you can probably do it better or cheaper today. The only thing it had that a regular PC doesn't is DVI, which is nice) and a 1TB drive (which isn't even half full after 3 years of ripping my paid-for DVDs). I then installed XBMC to watch those DVDs and Hulu Desktop to watch free Hulu on my TV. All of these are controlled by a USB-UART device that allows me to watch both with a remote that I was able to configure to work exactly like I wanted it. I control Hulu and XBMC via EventGhost (which is also free, in all forms of the word)

    I also watch Netflix via the browser, thanks to a cheap wireless keyboard and mouse.

    All told I spent maybe $400 on the hardware, and in about 5 months it paid for itself. I can't see everything but I've never had the problem where I had time to watch TV but nothing to watch. In fact, I have SEASONS of tv shows I'm behind on without time to catch up.

  69. Bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You killed the bad habit of channel surfing, there are other habits that take full advantage of the variety of programmes on TV.

    Calssic films that you won't find on the cinema any time soon, concerts, documentaries, sports (in moderation), news, good serials.

    New luddites should frankly stay in the little hobbit hole of ignorant snobbery that they inhabit.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Bullshit. by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      The worst part for me was seeing all the commercials & overlay advertising. Sure, classic films, documentaries, etc, are really interesting, but they take twice as long to watch and are constantly interrupted with all that crap.

  70. pay to play, essentially by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    sports/ LIVE. since i watch TV for sports exclusively, i pay CTV to handle that. sports and sports alone. me and sports. squish.

  71. You can express an opinion, but you are wrong.. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    Uninformed opinion of somebody that doesn't even watch the medium is utterly disposable.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  72. US TV is. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    Sorry about it peeps, our communist public TV doesn't have such constraints (which in turn forces commercial chains to up their game).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  73. Re:Pirate it and don't feel guilty. Paying is immo by needsomemoola · · Score: 1

    I completely agree. It makes no sense, to me, to pay to watch advertisements.

    --
    "That'll never compile."
  74. Listen to your local orchestra. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that one formed with students.

    Whay would you want to hear the Berlin Philahrmonic, the London Symphonic, the Royal Concertgebouw or any other of those lousy expensive outfits.....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  75. Why I have to stick with Dish/Cable by Squeezer · · Score: 1

    But I can't find anywhere that streams Formula 1 races live, so that keeps me with Speedchannel on Dish Network.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  76. Re:OTA, Netflix by skine · · Score: 3, Informative

    Netflix is fine for watching BBC content, so long as you're find with being a couple of years behind the times.

    While it's been a while since I've used Netflix, the last I've checked, Top Gear was only available up to Series 13.

    However, I am then left with no obvious way to watch Series 14-18.

  77. Out of curiosity by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

    -free TV via an antenna. Attached to all the rooms in the house. Both an old VCR and DVR that I use to tape stuff while I'm sleeping.
    - supplemented by Hulu.com over PC or roku
    - supplemented by DVD purchases of shows not on hulu (like Games of Thrones). Supplemented by uTorrent if the DVD has not been released yet.
    - I also read a lot of mystery or sci-fi magazines online if nothing's on.

    Just out of curiosity, would you have any interest in doing something more rewarding? Either for yourself or society in general?

    It's your time and you can spend it however you like. I was just wondering how happy you are with all these distractions in your life.

    Have you considered taking up a hobby?

    Writing can be enjoyable and possibly bring in some income if you're good at it. Having your first poem published can be an emotionally rewarding experience - more so than you would get from your typical TV show.

    How about taking college courses, either online or at the local university? Learning about something can be a lot of fun and improve your mind at the same time. Enough credits can improve your paycheck, and more money can make your life a lot more pleasant.

    There's a hacker revolution going on at the moment, and some of them are doing actual science. Being able to build things is interesting and useful in its own right. Being able to repair things can be quite valuable.

    Lots of open source projects are in need of assistance. Some of them have quite a community built up, being a part of one can be rewarding.

    I'm sure that recording TV shows while you sleep and watching them later can be pleasant, but is it really what you want to do with your life? Is there enough value in it?

    I'm just curious. I never was able to understand how people choose to spend their life by being entertained.

    This doesn't bother you at all?

    1. Re:Out of curiosity by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      I never was able to understand how people choose to spend their life by being entertained.

      Because entertainment is fun. That is, as they say, the entire point.

    2. Re:Out of curiosity by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Enough college credits can improve your paycheck,

      I already earn $140,000 a year. How much more do you think it would improve?

      >>>I'm sure that recording TV shows while you sleep and watching them later can be pleasant, but is it really what you want to do with your life? Is there enough value in it?

      I enjoy science fiction stories (and some fantasy). Also political news. I enjoy sharing it with friends as well. If I stopped, I'd be really bored with nothing to do. ----- And no open source programming doesn't interest me; that feels like a deadend, especially when they keep wasting their times on prettying-up the interface instead of something useful (like making it work with less than 100 megabytes RAM and therefore: fast). Puppy Linux seems to be the only release doing it right.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Out of curiosity by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      You suggest writing as one good way to spend time. But what if everyone wrote, and nobody took the time to be entertained and inspired by those writings? Creative expression is valuable, but it requires both creators and an audience.

      I certainly agree that a person should find interesting pursuits and not simply absorb entertainment. I just want to suggest that there is room for both of these things as part of a balanced and fulfilling life.

    4. Re:Out of curiosity by zaba · · Score: 1
      I know this is not directed towards me, but since I was the submitter of the "article", I am interested in following up. I am happy to take this to e-mail if you would like to continue the conversation and not distract others. todd at zabanet dot net.

      Just out of curiosity, would you have any interest in doing something more rewarding?

      I don't understand how a bit of leisure activity is mutually exclusive to doing something more rewarding. Can you enlighten me? I am seriously curious about that.

      Have you considered taking up a hobby?

      I have several hobbies. I have even made money from some of them. Some of those hobbies can be done with the television on in the background. The television serves as white noise.

      Writing can be enjoyable and possibly bring in some income if you're good at it. Having your first poem published can be an emotionally rewarding experience - more so than you would get from your typical TV show.

      I have never had a poem published, but I have had other things published and I agree. I have also done a ton of work in theatre and having a moment that makes the audience gasp is one of the most amazing feelings I have had. It doesn't compare to seeing my daughter walk in our bedroom in the morning and give me a big goofy grin and realize that she loves me completely. I can still watch T.V. with her and have hobbies.

      How about taking college courses, either online or at the local university?

      My B.A. is in philosophy and religion from Cornell College. My wife is finishing her BA this year and is eager to get her MA, all while being a full-time mother and full-time employee. She *IS* taking college courses both online AND at the local uni. Also, my mother runs a self-funded program for continuing education for retirees. Our family loves education, and sometimes watches T.V.

      There's a hacker revolution going on at the moment, and some of them are doing actual science. Being able to build things is interesting and useful in its own right. Being able to repair things can be quite valuable.

      In the past year, off of the top of my head, I have fixed my washer and dryer, rebalanced the loads on some circuits, ran new cables to reduce load on other circuits, and replaced all fans in the house with new ones. I do not understand how this has anything to do with occasionally watching T.V.

      Lots of open source projects are in need of assistance. Some of them have quite a community built up, being a part of one can be rewarding.

      Again, I agree. Although, with my skill set, I don't think I could help that much.

      I'm sure that recording TV shows while you sleep and watching them later can be pleasant, but is it really what you want to do with your life?

      This is what I do not understand from some of the people who are commenting. THIS IS NOT WHAT WE ARE DOING WITH OUR LIFE. It is just one tiny aspect of our life.

      Is there enough value in it?

      There is enough value in having a distraction for an hour or so from whatever else is going on in my life. Often, distracting myself helps me find a solution to a problem I was working on.

      I'm just curious. I never was able to understand how people choose to spend their life by being entertained. This doesn't bother you at all?

      I think I now understand where you are coming from. I DO NOT spend my life being entertained. I spend a tiny portion of it being entertained, and it doesn't bother me at all. I'll bet it doesn't bother you at all, either. If you disagree, I truly don't understand why you are on slashdot, as it is just one of many forms of entertainment. I also expect that you do not see movies, plays, concerts, etc. Seriously, I am more than willing to discuss this via e-mail, because I am struggling with your point of view.

  78. Honestly, don't ask here by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Ask your wife and your youngest child. They are the ones you have to please with your decision. It doesn't matter how much more variety of programming you can bring in, or how much money you can save. What matters is who can use your TV in your house. I'd wager neither your wife nor your youngest child want to use a keyboard to watch TV. If they can't get all the shows they want with a regular TV remote - or at least something that looks like one - then you have a non-starter.

    And no amount of monetary savings is worth screwing up your relationship with your family. If you make the system too difficult to use, they will direct their frustration back at you.

    And of course, another oft-overlooked advantage of paying someone for your TV service is that when something goes wrong, you have someone you can turn to. Sure, there are plenty of forums for MythTV and the like but nobody who will answer the phone and bring you out a new box when you call.

    So think long and hard before you cut the cord. And then when you think you have a solution, think some more.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Honestly, don't ask here by zaba · · Score: 1

      Great advice. Thank you so much.

      My wife is keen on the savings. And, <bragging> my 4 yo is so smart </bragging> that she will love the challenge of a new way to access t.v.

      I am still thinking long and hard and will think some more. Thanks again.

  79. Computer or TV playback, or both? by erica_ann · · Score: 1

    I have tried many different methods. I have had cable TV with just a receiver, with a DVR, a USB TV Tuner from Hauppage, www.hauppauge.com/, an external HDTV Antennae for over the air channels, Wii, Xbox, and via satellite and 3 DVRs.

    At one point with the USB TV Tuner from Hauppage I enjoyed recording all of my TV shows directly to the computer, scheduling ahead, and playback via Windows Media Player as well as the Xbox streaming from WMP. To this day, that was my favourite way. I do not have it hooked up now mainly because I have a cable package requiring the cable box where as when I had previously used it, it was the basic cable not requiring a decoder box.

    What I have ATM is 2 HDTV cable boxes (no DVR) and my Xbox. I was told I could get a TV card from the cable company to let me decode it, but I have not yet. I have not tried a mythTV box yet. I do like the idea though.

    I like having the convenience of scheduling, recording onto my HD and playing back from computer as I spend a lot of time here. If I were to get a DVR, I would like one that you can record on TV A and then pause, record, playback on any tv in the house. (Centurylink has one like this called Prisim)

    I like having netflix and WMP via the Xbox. I believe it is Verizon has a TV like app called FIOS on the Xbox. If I had the TV Tuner card (with decoder) to my pc... that would be the ultimate for me. Record on PC, playback via Xbox on tv and not have to pay rent for a DVR. I beleive same decoder card would work on a mythTV box also. Same principle.

    So, you would need to determine how the TV is going to be used, if you are going to want to watch it on PC and or TV.. and which is most efficient and budgeted for the household.

  80. XBMC + Sickbeard + USENET by Brooks138 · · Score: 1

    I like me a Windows platform, so I've settled on XBMC as a front end (you can do multi-room with a MySQL database and profiles). I use a HDHomeRun for a few ClearQAM channels available for free with my cable internet and USENET (supernews.com) for all my tv downloading needs. I don't miss my old satellite setup at all.

  81. Best TV is no TV by catsRus · · Score: 1

    Best TV experience ever was watching the garbage men take it away. Now that was valuable entertainment.

  82. Roku and PlayOn by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 2

    Roku plus a pc running PlayOn and some good playon plugins. Pretty much everything is out there ready to be streamed. Netflix and Hulu for Roku are good as well.

    --


    Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
  83. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by mallyn · · Score: 1

    And make things. I do.

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  84. Is OTA an option? by theother · · Score: 1

    It appears that OTA does not figure into your considerations. Why is that? FWIW, here's my setup, which works well for my tastes, even though we're 60 miles from the HDTV broadcasts. Two antennas, for different broadcast frequencies. SiliconDust tuner, two channels (three on new models). PC with Indel Core 2 Duo, 2 GB memory, 320GB hard disk. This supports simultaneous recording and viewing. I use home-brew Perl to manage all of this, but MythTV would do it for you, as would, I imagine, Windows Media Center. Aside from the initial capital outlay, this has zero ongoing costs. You could get a NetFlix subscription and save a bundle.

  85. How I kicked TV by cthlptlk · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I set a simple rule for myself: I only turn on the TV to watch something I know I want to watch before I turn it on. I didn't impose my rule on anybody else in the house.

    Less than six months later I cancelled the cable when I couldn't remember the last time anyone had watched it. No one noticed it was gone.

    I do watch cartoons with my older son, mostly for the pleasure of his company. As much as I dislike everything about iTunes, it is most fun for him to sit with me on the couch and watch stuff on an iPad. I just buy season passes to the things he likes... A few series a year are much cheaper than cable.

  86. Roku plus streaming by Jim+Hall · · Score: 2

    Here in Iceland I get my TV service through something called "myndlykill"; I don't know the English word for it, but it's a box with a Cat5 on the back that plugs into your hub and downloads channels from the net and yeilds an HDMI signal. Most people here have 50Mb/s or 100Mb/s optical fiber net connections so there's enough bandwidth for a good picture.

    Sounds like the Roku that I have: small box, connects to the net, streams content on demand. The only thing that may be different is Roku streams through other providers you already subscribe to such as Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, etc.

    When I moved to a new job 2 years ago, my wife & I opted not to install cable at the new house - we stream everything now via our Roku. It's been great! We'll keep streaming until the price point changes. Here's the math:

    At our old house, cable TV was about $80 per month. That's just for television - Internet connection is on top of that. At the new house, we watch a few shows (Castle, Modern Family, Daily Show, ...) via Hulu+ at $8/month, and a few shows (Mad Men, ...) from Amazon at $2/episode (assume $8/month per show, even though that's not year-round.) We don't watch much current TV, maybe 4 shows, so $32/month. Rather than current TV, we watch more TV on DVD (MI-5, Eureka, ...) and movies, so we stream Netflix for $8/month. Plus one show I can't get elsewhere: Star Wars: The Clone Wars on PlayStation Network, at $2/episode (or $8/month).

    So our monthly cost is $8 (Hulu+) + $8 (Netflix) + $8 (SW: Clone Wars) + $32 (Amazon) = $56. Compare that to $80 just for cable TV at the old house. That Roku (less than $100) paid for itself pretty quickly.

    1. Re:Roku plus streaming by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cable service fleeces you in the US. Net and phone, too. It's crazy how much they try to make you pay. Over here, we just get fleeced on hardware ;) I guess because we have higher rates of computer/net usage and computer/net proficiency in general (for example, IE is the number *three* browser here), they know that people will put up with paying high prices for hardware, but also that they'll work around things like TV or phone subscriptions if the price is too high.

      Interesting - Roku doesn't sound like the same thing (as you mentioned, it goes through existing providers and is only on-demand; the myndlykill connects through Síminn and does both on-demand or live network TV), but it sounds close.

      --
      Rhetorical questions suck. Why ask a question if you don't want an answer?
  87. We use Roku by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    I go into it in more depth in another comment, but I recommend Roku plus streaming.

    I don't recommend a refurb Roku, since you can get a new Roku on Amazon for $60-90 anyway. It just depends what model you want. (The higher models let you watch movies saved to a USB fob drive.)

    And you aren't tied to just one Roku box. We have one Roku in the living room to watch TV together, and I have another in the basement so I can watch TV while on the exercise bike. And of course, you can always stream Hulu+ or Netflix on an iPad from anywhere.

    You don't get news programming with this - but as someone else pointed out, it's great! We got most of our news from bbc.co.uk and other sources, even before we got our Roku. Cable news is really bad.

    Don't know about sports options, since I don't watch that.

    1. Re:We use Roku by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You don't get news programming with this

      Huh? Roku has Hulu... and Hulu has clips of NBC Nightly News. NBC Nightly News happens to be "news programming"

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:We use Roku by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Does it? Didn't realize. I never really looked for it. As I said, we get most of our news from bbc.co.uk and other sources, even before we got our Roku. Unless you count The Daily Show, which we do watch on Hulu.

    3. Re:We use Roku by evilviper · · Score: 1

      In fact, I now see ABC's Nightly World News has full episodes on Hulu... NBC news clips were better than nothing (or rather they would be if Hulu's interface was better and allow non-stop play of a sequence of clips) but a full news program every weeknight is infinitely better.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  88. SageTV! Wait, Nevermind. Google shut it down! by alanshot · · Score: 1

    I use a SageTV server that works BEAUTIFULLY. $100 media extenders allow me to stream to them live AND recorded shows. I can watch as many live shows and timeshift on as many TVs with media extenders as I have TV tuners installed in the server. In my case, all free, OTA HD receivers.

    I would suggest you look into it, but thanks to Google buying them out, the software is no longer for sale.

    While the bone they threw us of allowing those of us 1 version back to upgrade for free to the final release, I find it annoying they didnt also turn loose the media extender licenses required to connect more STBs to the server. Hell, I just wish Google would have continued to sell the product. I have two TVs I would love to bring onboard but I cant because I cant buy more licenses!

    The only upside is my assumption is that GoogleTV will get better with improvements using technology SageTV developed. Then again this could simply be a power grab to essentially shut down competition by buying them out and shelving the technology like the holy grail in a government warehouse.

  89. Re:OTA, Netflix by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    iTunes has them. In fact, they've been adding a lot of content in the last few months from the BBC. Dr. Who, Ab Fab, The IT Crowd, etc.

  90. Re:OTA, Netflix by Cimexus · · Score: 2

    BBC offering content to foreigners will happen about as fast as Hulu, Netflix, Pandora, and all the other American services offer THEIR products to paying customers outside America (i.e. probably never) :( It's unfortunately due to licensing restrictions and international copyright laws rather than them "not wanting to" or being technically unable to do it.

    (Australian here who is still bitter about them taking my Pandora away ... it used to be available globally, sigh. Oh well, VPNs to the rescue I guess?)

  91. No real substitute for sports programming by rwade · · Score: 1

    One notable exception is that if you are a big sports fan you will definitely miss live programming on ESPN.

    Have to agree with this. From original question:

    I would love to have ESPN, but can get my sports fix (mostly college football) through other means, I'm sure.

    Unless his "other means" is to spend a lot more time at your friends house or at a bar, I would not be so sure about that.

    ESPN3 is available free if you're using it from an internet connection of certain internet providers. However great ESPN3 is, it leaves much to be desired. You do get a lot of live games from the ABC and ESPN networks for free. However -- although most put a premium on live coverage of games, ESPN's feature and news programming is the best in the industry and not available (legally or even conveniently) at all online. I have found that I miss Baseball Tonight and Sports Center more than anything since I cut the cord in 2006. As a note, ESPN3 does provide access to SportsCenter and some other feature programming -- but the list of participating ISPs is limited to 4 as of today.

    Additionally -- I personally find it highly dissatisfying to watch a three hour football game on the same thing that I use to build spreadsheets and answer e-mail. While it is possible to run an HDMI cable to watch the game on your LCD, the image quality is clearly not really HD and the pain of changing the channel with a mouse is annoying to say the least.

    I am finding that old frugal me is learning as my income increases that some things were just worth paying for all along instead of hassling with "other means"...ESPN is on that list.

  92. Replace the hard drive? by Z80xxc! · · Score: 1

    You like the DVR, right? Disassemble it, take out the hard drive, figure out what type it is (probably 2.5" IDE or something of the like), buy a new one, then do a bit-exact clone to copy the hdd right over. Put it back in, and you're right back where you were.

  93. Easy by epp_b · · Score: 1

    Don't.

  94. Re:OTA, Netflix by mikael_j · · Score: 2

    iTunes only has movies and those were only added very recently, and a poor selection at that.

    Oh yeah, this is the Swedish iTunes store btw. I know the situation is different in other countries but to be honest I feel like ranting about the poor legal options for streaming and downloading TV shows here in Sweden.

    The most useful choice tends to be TV network websites but those don't feature nearly all the shows (a lot of times foreign shows are either unavailable due to licensing issues or they are removed within a week or so of airing (and they air long after the show aired in its country of origin)).

    Of course, as far as the TV producers are concerned we're all evil if we don't go along with their plan which includes waiting a couple of months after a show originally airs before gratefully watching the ad-supported TV broadcast followed by us purchasing the DVD set that comes out a few weeks after the season ends here in .se and finally we should buy the Bluray version when they release that...

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  95. Playstation 3 + PlayTV by phase_9 · · Score: 2

    Probably not the most popular answer on Slashdot, and only available to those of us in Europe and Australia; but a Sony Playstation 3 coupled with the Play TV USB TV Tuner addon and PS3 Media Server (an open source DLNA server) makes for one of the best "all-in-one" media center solutions available. A quick rundown of the combined features:

    • Watch and record live TV
    • Stream MKV, MP4, DivX over your home network
    • Lovefilm and Netflix, iPlayer, iTV Player, 4oD all as integrated apps
    • Solid Bluetooth remote control
    • BluRay player (not terribly useful to me...)

    Not bad for around £200 - oh and it plays games.

  96. Hathway digital cable by nikanth · · Score: 1

    Cheap and best

  97. Boxee Box for sure by jimj4m · · Score: 1

    Small, sleek design with HDMI out , has a Ton of reliable apps, Qwerty keypad (wish it was glow in the dark at least), and streams like a charm

  98. Depends on your budget by Casandro · · Score: 1

    If you have a high budget, rent a flat in the UK, where you can set up a satellite dish. Then use VDR and a high speed (>10 MBit) Internet connection to where you live to get to the signal.

    Other than that, certainly get some video capable computer connected to your TV. If you are in the US, try to get free to air satellite. Unfortunately because of the stupidity of the US market, you are pretty much out of luck when it comes to satellite television. Maybe you can erect some tower in order to get some terrestrial channels and use MythTV.

  99. Re:OTA, Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not everyone lives in a country blessed by Netflix...

  100. Re:A Vast Wasteland by kikito · · Score: 1

    > no different then burning down all the library's because they have a copy of twilight.

    Hmmmmmmmmmm...

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

  101. Bad geek, I guess by sscroggins · · Score: 1

    I've been using a WMC PC for years now and I've been very happy with it. About 90% of what my family had previously watched was regular network programming so I purchased an HD Homerun and use the PC as a DVR, to stream HULU, and to watch the occasional DVD or Blu-ray from Redbox. Both of my kids have Windows 7 laptops so they use WMC to connect to the tuner and watch whatever they need. Sometimes they use the laptop screen, sometimes they connect to their televisions. I dropped to about as basic of a cable plan as I could and I'm saving a pretty significant amount every month. The HD Homerun paid for itself in a few months.

  102. Re:Pirate it and don't feel guilty. Paying is immo by windcask · · Score: 2

    Immoral?

    I agree (mostly) with your arguments, but I fail to see how stealing programming because you dislike the medium in which it's delivered is moral. If you don't like ad-driven television or services like Hulu, either buy them in a medium in which you don't have to watch ads (on DVD, iTunes, Amazon, Netflix) or don't watch.

    I usually just read a book.

  103. Reading while grooming by tepples · · Score: 1

    Anecdote from my family: "Becky" likes to put on MSNBC's Morning Joe Brewed by Starbucks while she gets ready for work each morning. She has an FM transmitter plugged into the back of the cable box so that she can beam it to a radio in the bathroom and listen in the shower. She also listens using a portable radio and headphones so that she can hear the bobbleheads talk everywhere in the house. Can you read your websites while grooming yourself?

  104. Re:if I lived where antennas are not allowed by Scyber · · Score: 1

    They can NEVER stop you from installing an antenna or dish ON YOUR ROOF.

    Actually they can. Besides the point I mentioned above, there are very specific exceptions for historic districts where antenna can be banned on the exterior of buildings. Also HOAs can ban masts higher then 12 feet. In 99%+ of cases you can't be restricted from installing an antenna/dish on your roof, but there are a few cases where you can.

  105. WDTV + TV + software by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    --WDTV set-top box (http://www.amazon.com/Western-Digital-Streaming-Media-Player/dp/B005KOZNBW/ref=sr_1_1) ($80 or so)
    --computer w/storage and TV to connect to the WDTV
    --Usenet account ($10/m or so)
    --SABnzbd+ (free)
    --SickBeard (free)
    --CouchPotato (free)
    --Streaming Netflix (optional, $8/m or so)

    Tada!

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  106. Buy some guy's book by zookie · · Score: 1

    You can sort through the 100's of responses and attempt to summarize, or you can just buy this e-book from GigaOm. I'm not affiliated with the author, but I do like GigaOm, and their Cord Cutter series has been really good

    Cut the Cord: All You Need to Know to Drop Cable
    Cut the Cord: All You Need to Know to Drop Cable (link with referral code if so inclined)

    To answer the question, the best way to watch TV is AT&T's U-Verse: nice responsive UI, good channel selection, whole home DVR. But if you want the best bang for the buck, here's what I did:

    - Roku with Netflix. Added Amazon for one-off purchases. Also have a Hulu Plus subscription, but haven't found it useful yet.
    - Antenna for over the air -- better HD than cable and quite a few channels. Surprisingly, this little antennae worked really well for me:

    Paper Thin Leaf Indoor HDTV Antenna
    Paper Thin Leaf Indoor HDTV Antenna (link with referral code if so inclined)

  107. Your local library by Mozai · · Score: 1

    My mother and I each visit the local library in our respective cities. They have movies, documentaries, and tv-series boxed sets.

    I recently found James Burke's "Connections" at my library, and saw they had some of the old campy "Doctor Who" on DVD. My mother's been watching "Deadwood," and she's on the waiting list for more DVDs in the series.

  108. Roku is better. by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    I run ours through a Wii in the bedroom and a PS3 in the living room, though you could do it with a computer as well.

    Get a Roku. And spend the 10 extra bucks and get the Roku 2 XD.

    Like you, I used to use our Wii to stream netflix. but the quality was pretty poor. SD quality scaled up to 1080P. Bleah.

    I tried a Win7 box running Windows media center, and while it could do some things well, (such as stream my large amount of local server based media) the netflix quality was HORRENDOUS. And it can't do many other things, such as Crunchyroll, TWiT, and Revision 3 content.

    Also tried XBMC, and it was really nice, but couldn't do Netflix natively, and the user made hacks to get Netflix working were just that. Hacks. And ugly ones too.

    Eventually I broke down and snagged the Roku2XD on sale over Father's day weekend just this year. It does full 1080P Netflix and really nice scaling on older movies, plus it has TONS of other stuff like Crunchyroll, Revision 3, Twit, and on and on, and that's just the OFFICIAL channels. It also has piles of unofficial ones, and it has PLEX, which allows you to stream your local media on any box running the PLEX server module. (a little Win32 app that handles the sharing and does media conversion/streaming as well.)

    I have to say I've never been happier. While not perfect, the Roku2XD is absolutely the closest I've ever seen any box come to the "perfect" home media center experience.

    Oh, and the damn thing is the size of a Hockey Puck. I kid you not! You can use double-sided tape or Velcro to hang it off the back of your TV and the Bluetooth remote will still work perfectly. If you lose the remote or it dies, you can get a Roku remote app for your iPhone or Android device and use it's Bluetooth radio to control the Roku. It's AWESOME!

    Trust me, go buy a Roku 2 XD. You'll love it and won't look back.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  109. I've been off cable for over 2 years by jimharris · · Score: 1

    I've been off cable for over 2 years. I built my own DVR using Windows 7. I recently bought HD Home Run, a network TV tuner box with 2 tuners. I plug a network cable into it, an indoor antenna and a power cord. It's about the size of a Roku box. Any computer in the house can watch TV, and I record shows on my HTPC, which is hooked up to my 56" TV and stereo rig.

  110. Biggest problem - Live Sports by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't for watching live sports, I would cut off cable right now. Unfortunately, live sports make that pretty difficult to do if you are a fan. I use a Centon cable card tuner with Windows Media Center. This is a pretty good setup for live TV, I just wish there were some other Windows Media Center Extenders besides an XBOX 360. That thing sucks so much power, I hate to leave it on all of the time.

    WMC is a perfectly good DVR, but I find myself using XBMC along with Sickbeard to watch other TV shows. Sickbeard will pull the no commercial version of the show off of Usenet within 15 minutes of it being posted, and those scene guys post things pretty fast these days. I could usually watch Game of Thrones withing 30 of it airing on HBO.

  111. Ditched cable about a year ago. by Xoltri · · Score: 1

    Used to pay about $110 / month for satellite HD. Now we have a media server PC in the basement running Sickbeard and Sabnzbd which automatically downloads the shows we watch from a newsgroup service (astraweb) for $10/month. Then we have 2 boxee boxes, one on the living room PC and one in the bedroom that can stream media wirelessly from the media PC, or from the internet, including youtube. I love the boxee box, it's great.

    And, since we are in Canada we are using unblock-us.com which is not a VPN but some sort of DNS redirect service. I only have it configured on the boxee boxes so it doesn't affect our whole network, but it allows us to watch streaming US content.

    Finally, I have a cheap $10 HDTV antenna in case I ever get the desire to watch live sports...which I don't really. So in the end we've replaced a $110/month bill with a $15 / month bill and it's pretty much just as good.

    --
    -Xoltri
  112. It tough but not imposible by Urban+Nightmare · · Score: 1

    I cut the cord about 3 years ago now. Dropped the satellite and cable subs (except for cable internet). Our big screen now only receives OTA and we get 5 channels here (we're in western Canada) and no US broadcasts as we're to far away from the border. Just about everything we want is OTA so it's no problem. To record those OTA's I'm using a myth box with a 1TB drive, a couple of tuner cards and us the HDMI out. I do have a sub for tv listings but that's only 20 buck a year (maybe 25 I can't remember). A second myth box to stream recorded to the upstairs. For everything else we just use a wireless mount/keyboard to surf the network web sites to watch or we use the bluray player for netflix. For things we can't get any other way we get the DVD's from the library when they come out (12 bucks a year). Besides we found once we cut the cable we started reading more, going out side more, talking more. All of those things that TV zaps out of you. Do your self a favour and send the kids out side to play, and maybe go with them.

  113. Re:OTA, Netflix by Circuit+Breaker · · Score: 1

    > It's unfortunately due to licensing restrictions and international copyright laws rather than them "not wanting to" or being technically unable to do it.

    Actually, it mostly IS them not wanting to.

    The majority of the BBC programming is either owned by the BBC or commissioned for the BBC and gives the BBC worldwide distribution rights (e.g. on BBC America or BBC Middle East). Basically, if it ever becomes available on BBC America, they have the copyright assignment or equivalent, and they could start offering it for sale from day one.

    It is "not wanting", in the sense that it might sour their distribution partners and some of their content sources. But if they wanted it, they could.

    [That's not true for almost any broadcasting service, but it is true for the BBC]

  114. Having tried a few things... by jemenake · · Score: 1

    Alright, I've been down a couple of the roads that you're pondering, so I'll give you my experiences. But first, I'll explain my situation, so that you can evaluate whether our goals are congruent:

    For years, I've had TiVo's. I've owned everything from the original, to Series-2, to TiVo-HD. I've really had no reason to switch, until my cable provider rolled out "tuning adaptors". The idea behind these things is to let the cable company avoid sending every channel over every wire. Instead, cable boxes "request" that a certain channel be sent their way, and then the cable company routes that channel there. Essentially, every channel becomes video-on-demand. For DVR's, like the TiVo, they make a little "tuning adaptor" which you plug into the TiVo's USB port. Then, when the TiVo wants a channel, it requests it through the tuning adaptor. The problem with this is that the TiVo is required to classify the nature of the tuning request, whether it's for live TV viewing, or for a pre-set recording, or "speculative" recording (TiVo calls these "suggestions", where it is recording something it thinks I might like). This last category is where we run into problems, because they're one feature of the TiVo which I really like, yet they're the first kind of recordings to get declined by the cable provider. Alas, ever since I switched to tuning adaptors a few months ago, my TiVo has recorded about 10 "suggestions". It used to record 10 every couple of days.

    So, I'm starting to actively seek ways to "cut the cord". I first had to identify what I was seeking in my "ideal" TV arrangement:
    1 - Some sort of "Suggestions", where it finds me other content based upon what I've already watched and/or rated.
    2 - Live sports (primarily NFL, but some baseball, hockey, and hoops would be nice, now and then).
    3 - ESPN (I love SportsCenter, Pardon the Interruption, Dan LeBatard, etc... so... gotta have that).
    4 - Ability to back up and re-watch something (like TiVo's 8-second rewind) and slo-mo or freeze it.
    5 - Ability to watch anywhere (TV, iPad, iPhone?)

    I've tried home-brewed HTPC solutions, like MythBuntu and LinuxMCE, but they lack the slick polish that I've grown accustomed to with the TiVo and my iOS devices. Granted, I'm a geek; I spend a lot of my work day at the Linux command-line and I program in a half-dozen languages, but I want my content "consumption" experience to be effortless and polished. Also, I can't get hardly any HD stuff over the air, so... stuff like MythBuntu is a non-starter.

    A friend has AppleTV, and I have an iPhone and iPad, so I looked into the idea of going that route. Initially, I was turned off by the notion of paying for individual shows, but then I did the math. I'm paying about $70/mo for my digital cable, two tuner cards (for two TiVo's), and the HD tier. Add to that the $15/mo for each TiVo and I'm up to $100 per month. Now, shows in the iTunes store are about $2 each. So, if I watch fewer than 50 shows per month, I should come out ahead. Plus, you get the "Genius" recommendations (which I haven't tried, but it works well enough for music and app recommendations for my tastes). However, the live-sports stuff is slow in coming. There's no NFL, yet. However, if you're a Time/Warner cable customer (or if you know one who will give you their password), you can use the ESPN app to watch anything on ESPN, so you can get the Sunday-night game.... and I've heard that the NFL (or the network who carries it) makes the Thursday-night game available over the web, somehow. But the Sunday-day and MNF games... I guess I'd have to go down to the local sports-grill. The last thing that the AppleTV has going for it is just my own moral one. I like seeing my money go to a company which is rabidly trying to make really slick products than to Charter, who seems hell-bent on making my use tuning-adaptors, paying for channels I never watch, "renting" cable cards just so that I can watch the channels that I'm already paying for, etc. So, even if I end

  115. computer by jon3k · · Score: 1

    I download a couple of shows and watch on my computer (game of thrones and walking dead). Wake me up when I can access any content from anywhere without having to buy 1,000 other channels I'll never watch.

  116. Re:Whoa I just thought of something! by zaba · · Score: 1

    Interesting idea. (And, thanks to everyone else for their input, as well. I am enjoying all the different replies.)

    Of course, the idea is to save money, so I would probably only offer them 20 bucks each. (or maybe $30... a dollar/day for no T.V.) Of course, as bright as my four year old is, I am not sure that handing her a $20 bill would really latch on...

    Since you mention crafts, I want to clarify something that seems to have been lost by many of the people who have commented. Television is only one small subset of our daily lives. Hearing the hard drive start to die in our DVR got me to thinking about the money we are spending on television in relation to the utility it brings us. $100/mo seems excessive when the kids get as much joy helping in our garden, playing in the back yard, going fishing, helping cook dinner, etc.

    Oh, and crafts. My 4 yo made me a 2' x 1' father's day card. Every day she colors, draws, etc. and she loves books way more than T.V. She can already sound some words out and is very close to being able to read. She loves dancing and will start dance school in two months. My wife and I have both been actively involved in theatre for the past 7 years. I have done light design for dozens of shows, as well as being tech/crew for several dozen more (including some IATSE gigs). My wife has had roles in plays as has our son.

    So, I do appreciate everyone's comments and I do understand why some people have made the assumption that television is a priority. In fact, the reason I wrote the Ask Slashdot question is the the opposite. It seems like we are paying an exorbitant amount of money for the convenience of having T.V. when we want it and I was looking for ways to kill that bill, since T.V. is not necessary, but can be nice...

  117. Re:Television is a prison for your mind. by iamnobody2 · · Score: 1

    hey, Rosanne was a great show!

    --
    nobody's perfect
  118. Good qweschun finally! by toxonix · · Score: 1

    Here's an ask /. question that doesn't suck! I can tell you the NOT answer: Netflix or Hulu on PS3. PS3 might be OK for games. But Netflix sucks on PS3, and the PlayStation Network requires signing in to use it, which means you have to get the MANDATORY PS3 updates when Sony decides to release a few minor features, which nobody really wants (move multiple data files at a time? did I need to do that?). Then you're stuck waiting for Sony to give you the entire OS, re-install, reboot, sign in again, etc. By this time your date is bored, dissatisfied, and not interested in making out, because you've chosen the wrong system for watching movies or doing anything but gaming. Unless she's into gaming, in which case you've got a winner. I'd like to try a Roku BTW. Or just an HTPC with dual boot and some good graphics hardware.

    1. Re:Good qweschun finally! by zaba · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I thought this would be something other /.ers were thinking about.

  119. Mod Parent Up by RPI+Geek · · Score: 2
    Flamebait. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    Flamebait - Comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage.

    I'd suggest read the moderation guidelines, specifically this part:

    Concentrate more on promoting than on demoting. Try to be impartial about this; simply disagreeing with a comment is not a valid reason to mark it down. The goal here is to share ideas, to sift through the haystack and find needles, and to keep spammers and griefers in check.

    I normally don't nitpick like this, but but parent brings up a good point:

    The thing is, each seems to be watched by people who only want reinforcement of their own worldviews. That's no way to develop an intelligent, informed opinion.

    George Carlin was right, the US is screwed because the public is wilfully ignorant.

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  120. HTPC with MediaPortal/OTA/ForTheRecord by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 1

    HTPC with MediaPortal (only runs on Windows - win 7 works pretty well for this), OTA reception with decent roof-mounted antenna (find your reception report) and ForTheRecord for PVR functionality.

    --
    Corporate Gadfly
    Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
  121. WMC on Fit2PC with Silicon Dust HomeRun by JTW · · Score: 1

    Run Windows Media center (Win7) on a Fit2PC (it has an HDMI output and a bay for a 2.5 inch drive) pair it with a Silicon Dust HDHomeRun network cable tuner.

    Or

    Run a EyeTV on a Mac Mini with a Silicon Dust HDHomeRun network cable tuner and pair that combo with an AppleTV

    The first option using WMC is much easier and costs less, EyeTV requires a Channel listing subscription.

    Personally I'm still experimenting, but WMC makes a lot of sense and its well established, plus the channel listing subscription is free.

    Rumor has it Microsoft will be coming out with a split personality XBox offering, with a high end Xbox for media and gaming, and a low end Xbox offering called xTV to compete with AppleTV - but that's strictly rumor.

  122. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by zaba · · Score: 1

    What are your goals? Watch TV,

    I guess I wasn't clear? Our family has had T.V. since we have become a family. The hard drive is dying in the DVR. If I replace the DVR, I am locked in to another two year contract. T.V. is not essential, but it is nice. I enjoy having a/c in our house, as well, but it is also not essential. Same with running water. These are all things I could live without, but prefer to have. I watch T.V. rarely. The rest of my family watches it a little bit more than I do. We could just shut it off completely, but it would be nice to have SOME television every now and again.

    get your sports fix,

    In the summary, I mentioned that I could watch sports elsewhere. I only brought up sports as that seems to be the biggest reason people continue to pay a premium for cable or satellite.

     

    live an interesting life

    YES! THANK YOU! THIS! +1!!! LIKE! I would love to live an interesting life. Although, not in the Chinese curse kind of way.

    I really don't understand how having a television in my house means I do not lead an interesting life. I could bore you to tears if I told you how "interesting" my life was. Suffice it to say, I am not the guy that sits on his butt all day and then grabs fast food on the way home and puts the T.V. on as a way to dope his children.

    raise your kids for fun and profit?

    While I appreciate the history of A.C. on Slashdot, it seems like you are being A.C. just to be pious and/or snarky. I actually do raise my kids for fun. They fill my heart like nothing else can.

    >Kid's shows could be in one room and adult shows in another.

    Yegads! You left out the family pet shows!

    Yes, you *do* need to cut the cord. Play monopoly (or whatever) with your kids.

    We have. We do. Monopoly with a 4 year old is... interesting. But, she enjoys it. We play Old Maid and Go Fish with her, too. We also take her to "go fish" (literally). Oh, I also take her on "adventures" like taking a boat to see all the dolphins in our bay. Yes, really. We live in an area where we can jump on a boat and look at dolphins. Then, when we are done with that, we can go to the seafood market two blocks down and get fish that is literally just off the boat. And we watch T.V. sometimes.

    Read books together.

    At least every single night, before she goes to bed. We just finished the adult version of Alice in Wonderland (i.e. not a Disney version, but the original) just a few nights ago.

    Go on a camping trip. Sports fix: little league, bicycle, competitive juggling. Good god, if you truly love your kids, turn off the idiot box for good.

    OK, that's harsh. Try turning it off for three days. Or for 24 hours one day a week.

    Um, unless there's a new Eureka/Doctor Who/Torchwood episode.

    Okay, I like your humor at the end, which acknowledges that there is some good reason for having T.V.. Please keep in mind that T.V. is just one thing we do, and it is something we do little of, which is why I want to get rid of the bill, As a family, we are incredibly active, and the "heaviest" of us has a BMI of 24.3, so I am pretty sure we are getting our sports fix in outside as well as on the television.

  123. Statutory rape? by cmattdetzel · · Score: 1

    Did it occur to anyone else that if the two adults (ages 36 and 30) are the natural parents of the two minors (ages 13 and 4) in the family, there may have been statutory rape involved in the conception of the older child (depending, of course, on whether the law in the family's place of residence provides for an age of consent > 16 years old)?

    1. Re:Statutory rape? by zaba · · Score: 1
      I am not the biological father of the 13 year old, although I have been the only father he has known since ~4 years old.

      Did it ever occur to you that your comment is COMPLETELY off-topic? Did it ever occur to you that many people do not consider their step {son | father | mother | daughter} as steps? They just consider them as family? Did it occur to you that I am well aware that my wife has a history that she is not completely proud of (are any of us?) and yet I love her anyway?

      In summary:

      When the adults are ready to speak to you, they will ask you to come from the kiddie table. Kindly, keep your tangential asides to yourself until you realize how much words (like RAPE) are counter-productive.

      Until then,

      Echo Alpha Delta.

    2. Re:Statutory rape? by cmattdetzel · · Score: 1

      Did it ever occur to you that your comment is COMPLETELY off-topic? Did it ever occur to you that many people do not consider their step {son | father | mother | daughter} as steps? They just consider them as family? Did it occur to you that I am well aware that my wife has a history that she is not completely proud of (are any of us?) and yet I love her anyway?

      Admittedly, my prior comment was off topic; hardly a first for /. or an offense meriting reprisal. What my off-topic comment did not do, however, was engage--even tacitly--in the judgments you apparently perceived to have been made thereby. I meant no offense -- and certainly nothing in my words impugned (i) your relationship with your children [natural or otherwise] or (ii) your feelings for your wife. YOU supplied the context.

      I'm also willing to admit, in retrospect, that the comment I made was a bit tactless, and I should have been more diligent in censoring myself rather than firing off a quick post. On this account, I apologize for any resulting offense. As a practical matter on your end, you might want to omit irrelevant personal details the next time you ask advice from an online community.

  124. So you listen to me! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Listen to me. Television is not the truth. Television is a Goddamned amusement park! Television is a circus, a carnival, a traveling troupe of acrobats, story-tellers, dancers, singers, jugglers, side-show freaks, lion tamers and football players. We're in the boredom killing business! So, if you want truth go to God. Go to your gurus. Go to yourselves because that's the only place you're ever going to find any real truth. But, man, you're never gonna get any truth from us. We'll tell you anything you want to hear. We lie like hell. We'll tell you that, uh, Kojak always gets the killer and that nobody ever gets cancer at Archie Bunker's house. And no matter how much trouble the hero is in, don't worry. Just look at your watch. At the end of the hour he's going to win. We'll tell you any shit you want to hear. We deal in illusions, man! None of it is true! But you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creeds...We're all you know. You're beginning to believe the illusions we're spinning here. You're beginning to think that the Tube is reality and that your own lives are unreal. You do whatever the Tube tells you. You dress like the Tube; You eat like the Tube; You raise your children like the Tube; You even think like the Tube. This is mass madness! You maniacs! In God's name, you people are the real thing. We are the illusion! So turn off your television sets. Turn them off now. Turn them off right now. Turn them off and leave them off. Turn them off right in the middle of this sentence I'm speaking to you now. Turn them off!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  125. Re:OTA, Netflix by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Dude! Just use an IP cloak!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  126. Re:OTA, Netflix by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

    Amazon Prime has Top Gear UK up to Season 17.

  127. Netfli-- by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

    The problem I have with Netflix is that nearly every show I want to watch doesn't have all the seasons. I like to watch serial programs, so I get about half or two-thirds through the program and find that the last one or two seasons is missing, so I'm stuck with pirating the last episodes if I want to see the rest of the show.

  128. Media box is the way to go.. by nanospook · · Score: 1

    I am either using something like Netflix, or watching media I have in-house. I keep my in-house media on a NetStora server which is basically a hard drive in a standalone box which can be controlled via web or through a share. I have a wireless google tv sony blue ray player that runs an app that can read windows shares (and other types) and play the media. it can also play the subtitle file I can download (since I'm deaf). Except for this one subtitle feature, I don't necessarily recommend Google TV. Very stagnant and boring, not a fast changing environment that I thought it would be. One thing I do like is I can control the Google TV box with my android phone using a Sony app. I get my in-house content through bittorrent and use a VPN to keep out of trouble. It's not perfect but minimizes risk. Surprisingly I find myself watching netflix most of the time anyways.. :) -- Have you fscked your local propeller head today?

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  129. Android TV Stick by Supercooldude · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one mentioned one of those TV sticks that have been selling on all the Chinese electronics sites lately. Just google "android tv stick". I'm not recommending for or against them, just thought someone should bring them up in case you haven't heard of them as they tend to be cheaper than apple tv or roku.

  130. AppleTV: Netflix, XBMC (Hulu) by akpak · · Score: 1

    We've cut the cord with a jailbroken AppleTV with XBMC on it. We use the HomeSharing in iTunes on the various computers for our party music, Hulu (free) plugin for XBMC, and pay for streaming-only Netflix. Anything that isn't on Netflix or Hulu (free) we will borrow or torrent. We have one computer in the house that is basically just a shell for a few giant hard drives, and XBMC on the AppleTV to stream from it. This has been working out pretty well, but we will be adding an HD antenna to the TV when football time rolls around again.

  131. Re:Cut the cable, download what you want by zaba · · Score: 1

    It seems incredibly interesting that those who have been the most helpful are the ones that accept that T.V. will be a part of our lives. Those that understand that have offered great advice. It is also interesting that those who are just completely anti-TV often bring up things (such as commercials) which are obviously answered by my question. One of the "requirements" is having a DVR. By definition, I would assume that would mean I can fast forward through commercials. And, yes, I can turn it off. Yes, I can read a book. These are things I do all the time. The T.V. has been off for over 24 hours (even with the kids and wife in the house) and I cannot remember the last time I personally turned it on. Wait... I can. It was four days ago, after I worked a 14 hour day (all of which I was on my feet) and just wanted some mindless noise to end the day. That is when I heard the hard drive start to die. I am not picking on you, A.C., but it sure is funny that: a. the best advice has come from those who understand that there will be TV in the house (thus, actually answering my question) b. those that have mentioned "read a book" or some such are so mighty and pious that, by their replies, they have made it explicit that their way of life is the only "good, true" way. (Reminds me of some people who are a little too enthused about their religion. I am not talking about one with a big I.... or a little i... or a big C. I am just generalizing.) c. Those that HAVE offered advice have never assumed anything beyond the question (i.e., lifestyle, weight, etc.) whereas so many that have said "keep the TV off" have made several incorrect assumptions. d. While I accept that "entertainment" could be better coming from a computer monitor (more interactive) than a TV, it makes me giggle like a little school girl every time I read someone saying that I AM DOING IT ALL WRONG by watching any TV at all, especially since e. THE WHOLE DAMN POINT OF THE QUESTION WAS TO REDUCE THE COST OF TV. Maybe, some day, I will be the perfect dad and husband and just get rid of it completely. In the mean time, doesn't it make sense to lower the cost and make it easier to get rid of the whole thing?

  132. Re:My first thought was by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    drunk and stoned,

    ... along with some PVR device so you can fast-forward through the bits you're not interested in : averts, the non-sex scenes of movies, trailers.

    If there is something that you want which isn't available FTA, then you'll need to invest in some surfing time, or a pay-to-air solution of some sort, whichever is most amenable.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  133. my solution, may not be for you by masterjames · · Score: 1

    my parents were spending about 100 bucks a month but i fixed that for them. now they use my system. i use xbmc on the old xbox. softmod those things and they work well for streaming content up to the quality bluray rips (less than full bluray quality but better than dvd rips by a bit). anything above that and it cant handle it. the old xbox only supports up to 1080i but i dont know what most of my files are. That is just my front end. im waiting for my raspberry pi to come in august and then im planning on using that for xbmc as it is so small and it has hdmi output. you could use the western digital tv live or anything else that will do local network media streaming over samba or similar file sharing protocol. boxee is another option that works. i use a server as my central point for all my front ends to stream from. at the moment im using xp as my server os because thats how i know how to do it right now. it just sits under my tv without a keyboard, mouse, or monitor so it is unobtrusive and the fan is so quiet you wouldnt even know it was there. ive got all my content split into movies tv and music so its organized and i can rdp into that box from anywhere because i have the ports opened up on my router. i have my content on one 2tb drive and i have an exact copy in my desktop should the server copy go bad. it is effective and i dont have any bills other than internet access.

  134. Re:if I lived where antennas are not allowed by evilviper · · Score: 1

    "Also HOAs can ban masts higher then 12 feet."

    Not true! First off, it's 12ft OVER THE TOP OF YOUR ROOF LINE (if mounted on the ground, a 30+ft mast would still be okay). And second, that's just the cutoff where local authorities (like HOAs) can require some form pre-approval that would delay installation. If you NEED an antenna more tham 12ft above the top of your roof to receive local channels, then they still have to approve your request after a minimal delay UNLESS there's some serious safety issue (eg. low-hanging overhead power lines, or similar).

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  135. Opptions for non-US'ers? by Finite9 · · Score: 1

    Not to be offensive or anything, but does anyone know of similar "cut the cord" options for Europeans? Because everything i've read so far applies to the US and I live in Scandinavia. I've got a home server Gbit to my media centre with a jailbroken ATV2 running XBMC Eden, an Xbox360 for streaming 1080p movies, so streaming movie rentals are completely covered, and a satellite subscription, but I honestly cannot think of a user friendly way to cut the cord that would be acceptable for tech-un-savvy family members!

    I could do without most of the crap on TV, but the national channels in HD are not available unless you have some kind of satellite/cable subscription. Plus, I love NatGeo and Discovery and the BBC channels. If I could get those channels through XBMC then I would be able to get rid of my satellite subscription. Note that free TV via antenna is not an option, because although you can get some of the free channels, they are not HD, and you only get channels 1,2 & 4 for free, whilst the other 2 big "national" channels (which aren't really free) are channels 3 & 5, and I would lose them if I just stuck an antenna on my house.

    Things seem to be very different for you people in the US... It seems like "national basic channels" is not really an issue for those cutting the cord?

    I suspect that part of the problem may be that because we don't have Netflix or Hulu over here, and whilst there may be some add-ons to xbmc that let you watch certain programmes from the national channels, it may involve a big change in interface we use to watch tv that neither my family nor myself or accustomed to: pressing channel 1 on the remote versus starting ATV-->starting xbmc-->choosing add-on from Videos-->choosing a program manually. Channel flicking and putting on the TV for background watching, are too ingrained.

    --
    "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman
  136. XBMC by devilsdean · · Score: 1

    Run your own server. XBMC runs on quite a few platforms. Apple TV 2 comes in at 99, and can now do surround sound and HD video. Also, you can create multiple profiles on each device and password protect them. Have the setup default to the kids menu with only tv shows and movies. Then, if the password is entered, it loads all of your collection available. Profiles can be synced between all of your devices over an easy to setup mysql server. This also supports pause and resume from different playback devices. You can source your own collection, or use software such as Sickbeard and Couchpotato to build up your collection to stop you from having to rip all of your dvds. These programs will also update your library and show as new items in XBMC. Bottom line is that XBMC is here to stay and has a huge developer backing. Install it or run it as a live distro and see what you think. It has served me well since its first release for the original Xbox.

  137. haven't even bothered to get cable by nobodie · · Score: 1

    Vizio VIA TV with a cheapo freebie Dell opteron added on to pick up some things like ESPN and HBO (had it and dropped it because we only watched one show and when it was over....) but HULU plus covers a lot, overlays with netflix which often gives two choices. Then I also use the Dell for "Eclipse.tv" which has sometimes better connectivity than the Vizio VIA apps. I just like having the browser available and plan to enable xbmc to hook up my music and movies through nfs4, bingo.

    Stay away from wifi, lan is just faster and less laggy.

    --
    Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  138. MY Setup by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    Here's what works for me. I get over 40 channels:

    SETUP 1 :
    - Antenna attached to the TV + DVR/VCR
    + Hulu.com
    + DVD or uTorrent
    + supplemented by youtube, podcasts, etc

    SETUP 2 (if antennas not allowed or desired)
    - $25/mo Dish
    + hulu, DVD, etc

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"