Slashdot Mirror


IT Layoffs At Insurance Firm Are A 'Never-Ending Funeral' (computerworld.com)

dcblogs quotes a report from Computerworld: The IT layoffs at MassMutual Financial Group will happen over a period of many months, and it's going to be painful for employees. Employees say they are training overseas workers via web conferencing sessions. There are contractors in the office as well, some of whom may be working on temporary H-1B visas. Employees say they notice more foreign workers in the hallways. Approximately 100 employees are affected. The employees are angry but can't show it. A loss of composure, anything other than quiet acquiescence, means risking two weeks of severance pay for each year on the job. But maintaining composure is hard to do. "I know a few people that are probably close to a breakdown," said one IT employee. [A second IT employee described the emotional impact of the layoffs on employees in this way: "It's like a never-ending funeral."] Intel also confirmed major layoffs in April, which will affect some 12,000 employees or 11 percent of its total workforce.

255 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now you may or may not think Trump will DO anything about it, that is a separate topic...

    But a whole lot of people are tired of this and Trump keeps saying he'll do something about it.

    At the end of the day, "Acting Presidential" is less important to the average person than not having their job outsourced overseas.

    1. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is why Trump has his name brand shirts made in Mexico and his other products are made in China.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's a huckster, first and foremost, and has spent his entire career proving that people are stupid enough to fall for it, Presidential bid included.

    3. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which is why Trump has his name brand shirts made in Mexico and his other products are made in China.

      Again, you're missing the point...

      People support Trump because he SAYS he'll do something about it. I have no idea if he will, and it may not even matter.

      Bernie is telling everyone, "free everything", and he couldn't do that either, even if he wanted to.

      People are clearly unhappy, and for good reason.

      Profit is nice, but is that what we want our society to be all about? If not, then we need to change the rules.

    4. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...Trump keeps saying he'll do something about it.

      Yeah, and what he'll do is expand it. Trump loves the whole H-1B idea, and he's said so repeatedly.

      Trump: “I’m in favor of people coming into this country legally. And you know what? They can have it any way you want. You can call it visas, you can call it work permits, you can call it anything you want...."

      Trump: "We need highly skilled people in this country, and if we can’t do it, we’ll get them in. But, and we do need in Silicon Valley, we absolutely have to have."

      Trump’s answer during the Megyn Kelly interview was consistent with his answer during the CNBC debate. He said again that Silicon Valley needs highly skilled workers, and showed his support for the H-1B program. Further, he appeared to support employers sponsoring H-1B workers for green cards, saying, “We absolutely have to be able to keep the brain power in this country.”

      Also, he said, “I know the H-1B. I know the H2B. Nobody knows it better than me. I’m a businessman. These are laws. These are regulations. These are rules. We’re allowed to do it. I will take advantage of it; they’re the laws. But I’m the one that knows how to change it. Nobody else on this dais knows how to change it like I do, believe me.”

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bernie's "free everything" has a funding plan that pays for all of it, and doesn't grow the debt. Only his haters imply the plan can't work, when it's about the same as everyone else's, with just a few numbers changed.

    6. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, I got your point. I was showing the hypocrisy of those who blindly support him.

      He says he'll bring jobs back to America yet refuses to manufacturer his own products in this country.

      He say's the economy sucks yet he's making money at it by not employing Americans.

      He talks about how much his stuff is worth, such as a golf course, yet his accountants value the same property at 1/10 what he says, thus depriving the community of taxes.

      I read his book, Art of the Deal, way back when (unlike others just now jumping on the band wagon). In it he openly describes how he deceived and lied to banks to get his loans for the casinos in Atlantic City.

      His famed Trump University? Nothing but a money-making scheme to get people to hand over their money. Even the people who used to work for him state it was all a big lie.

      But none of this matters to his supporters. Not even the fact he considers failure (i.e bankruptcy) his first option rather than the last will dissuade those who are pissed a black guy is in office, the stock market is at its highest levels ever, all the jobs lost by the last president have been recovered and then some and gas prices are low. All they want to hear are platitudes and bloviating from a white guy who is on his third marriage.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and what he'll do is expand it. Trump loves the whole H-1B idea, and he's said so repeatedly.

      Maybe, maybe not... I honestly have no idea what he'll do, because he talks out of both sides of his mouth too much...

      I know Hillary won't change it, that's for sure.

      Shame Bernie isn't running against Trump, now THAT would be interesting...

    8. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by beltsbear · · Score: 1

      For the most part. The tax on wall street to pay for higher education will probably not work anywhere near as well as needed but most of the other stuff is sound.

    9. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by murdocj · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh please. Yes, Trump says he'll do something. He also says he saw thousands of Muslims dancing on the streets in New Jersey on 9/11. He will say ANYTHING. The concept of "truth" just doesn't occur to him. He relies on people like you who simply don't have any ability to process information. God help us.

    10. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by lgw · · Score: 1, Insightful

      IIRC, Bernie's plan was "significantly increase taxes on the middle class", which might actually work, assuming the economy doesn't tank as a result of the taxes. I like his honesty. When politicians say "tax the rich" what they always mean is "increase taxes on the middle class", but people keep falling for that lie.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a larger point to be made here.

      Let's review our basic civics classes from back in elementary school and ask ourselves the test question. "What are the three branches of American government?"

      Then let's ask ourselves which branch of government makes laws and provides for funding of issues like monitoring Muslims, building Walls, deporting 11 million people, kicking the fuck out of ISIS, changing tax laws, or even making America great again?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    12. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

      Trump is a vote for "something different" versus "more of the same." Recall Deez Nuts getting 9% of the vote in the August 19th, 2015 North Carolina presidential poll.

      Now... if The Bern runs on the Green Party ticket with Jill Stein, in a 3-way race, he could actually become president. At a minimum, he could accuse Hillary of siphoning votes from him instead of vice versa, if he gets a larger percentage of national votes.

    13. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The H1B rules as I remember them are roughly that you can hire an H1B worker only if you can't find an American with the necessary skillset. I think there is even a limit on how many H1B workers you can hire and you can not pay them less. I say let's beef those rules up. Let's make employers pay 1.33 times the salary they pay the H1B into the unemployment insurance. On top of that, let's make it so that if a qualified American applies for the job after an H1B has been hired, the H1B is immediately displaced from the job and that American is hired in his place. Even if the H1B has been on the job for months to years. Let's limit an H1B worker to a single employer for a maximum of 36 months, after which they have to return to their home country and must wait through a waiting period of 3 years before they can again work as an H1B. Let's make it that they can only work for that single employer in one state. Work across state lines is prohibited, that means they can not join conference calls or communicate work results directly to coworkers across state lines. Let's add huge fines and penalties, uncertainty, short deadlines, intensive reporting requirements, compelling incentives to report violation, in short to discourage H1B employment to the greatest extent possible! Even with these rules in place we can still hire that Russian neurosurgeon, but he will only be there really to train Americans who will be doing his job after the 18 months are up. Who we wont be hiring with these rules is Prakash just because he put NoSQL on his resume.

    14. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by ogdenk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep and the corrupt oligarch who flip-flops on every single issue every time she's handed a big wad of cash is any better.

      I was willing to give Bernie a chance but not Hillary. Not ever. She's insane and completely fake. She's just as bad a narcissistic psychopath as Trump if not worse. Trump is an idiot and will be completely ineffective as a president as well as being stonewalled at every turn. I can deal with 4 years of zero progress and he'll help further the destruction of the GOP allowing a 3rd party to eventually rise. I'm OK with that.

      Clinton OTOH I absolutely KNOW will try to strip me of my rights. Trump will leave me alone and his crazier ideas will never pass. If Trump wins, it's because the Dems and media screwed Bernie over while labeling him as an unelectable commie.

      Me? I'm back to my usual Libertarian vote but I was willing to put up with the Social Democrat who was reasonably honest. Gary Johnson 2016! #FeelTheJohnson

    15. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You like tax and bank fraud? That's what it is. Understating the value of a property like that, you're committing either tax fraud or investment fraud.

      Now, of course Trump will never face charges himself, at least not criminal ones, since he can agree to pay a large "fine" instead, but that's a separate issue...

    16. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      On top of that, let's make it so that if a qualified American applies for the job after an H1B has been hired, the H1B is immediately displaced from the job and that American is hired in his place.

      That right there is a guarantee that you won't get any skilled immigration into America. No one is going to take the risk of flying halfway round the world to work for {Google | Apple | Microsoft | Facebook} if they will suddenly be told "okay, bye, go back home at your own expense" as soon as an American shows up.

      Let's limit an H1B worker to a single employer for a maximum of 36 months, after which they have to return to their home country and must wait through a waiting period of 3 years before they can again work as an H1B.

      They already are limited to 36 months, though you can apply for one (and only one in your entire life time) extension for another 36 months. At that point, the company must again fulfil the same criteria as they did when they initially hired you. The reason you don't want to just send them home forever, is because the entire point of the system is that it's good for the economy to get highly skilled workers into the country. You absolutely want them to come, and stay.

      The problem is not that H1B workers stay in the country after their H1B on an extension or a green card.

      The problem is that companies are currently hiring them into generic consulting roles, rather than very specific jobs, and then outsourcing those consultants to other companies to allow them to dump Americans for jobs they can do.

      Work across state lines is prohibited, that means they can not join conference calls or communicate work results directly to coworkers across state lines.

      Again - that defeats the point of the program. Putting ridiculous limitations on this just negates the positive effect on the economy.

      Here's an alternative ruleset that might help more than what you're proposing:
      1) Disallow companies from hiring H1Bs into roles selling services to other companies, require them to work on goods sold by the hiring company only.
      Or
      2) When an employee is contracted out to another company, require that the same requirements are placed on the contract as are placed on the initial hiring of the H1B - require that the H1B is paid at least as much as the average American wage for an *employee* in the job they're being contracted out to.

    17. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by losfromla · · Score: 2

      Give Bernie a chance, send him money, like I do. Or volunteer to make calls for him. Vote for him if you are in California.

      LOL @ #FeelTheJohnson, that is a ballsy slogan, if a bit derivative.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    18. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by losfromla · · Score: 5, Informative

      30 years ago we had free, or next to free college in California. All the way through a Doctorate at the public universities UCs and CSUs, some of which were also world class.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    19. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by trout007 · · Score: 1

      I'll explain. It would be nearly impossible in the current economic climate to make these products in the US because customers will shop based on price and if they are made here they won't sell. So the choice is to make them overseas or don't make them at all.

      The protectionist argument is if you make the tariffs high enough then at some point it is cheaper to make those items in your country as opposed to overseas. But at least your people are working and aren't on welfare. The problem is you are now paying tariffs and more money for the items.

      This is the problem with trying to centrally plan an economy.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    20. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by losfromla · · Score: 1

      How about Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, England... Did you forget about those contestants?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    21. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Berkyjay · · Score: 2

      Which rights are those? I hear this alot, but no one ever clarifies which rights.

    22. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      7 years of failing economy

      This is the S&P 500 over the past 7 years. If that's a "failing" economy, I'd sure like it to "fail" more often!

    23. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Chose one:
      [ ] Hillary - lying, cheating, corrupt politician who will deliver status quo, leaning left.
      [ ] The Donald - Exaggerating bullshit artist who will deliver status quo (after hiring help), leaning ? (talks right, does left)
      [ ] A Circus - multiple 3rd party candidates all jump in the race and the election is a free-for-all, winner will deliver status quo...


      The biggest issue is who gets to nominate the next few Supreme Court justices... Hillary will be left, but tough to get thru the Senate, so maybe moderate. Trump will be more moderate straight-up, so maybe the results are the same either way.

      Wait, did I just imply the election means nothing? (in results)

      But a Trump victory would at least shake up the "establishment"... (but I wouldn't be surprised by the Circus scenario before November.)

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    24. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Damn the Clinton political trolls are out in force. Seriously blaming Trump for the current state of out sourcing and H1B scammed major salary cuts is just so right wing daft, especially doing it on /. It is only the PR bubble that keeps it going, believing their own lies and believing everyone else believes (professional liars caught up in their own delusion of superiority). It comes off really lame and stupid blaming someone for something they adamantly had no control over and just straight up loses far more than it gains.

      They should save the silly stuff for cheetos forums, where the sheep congregate, it just comes off a really lame and a reason to counter, not for any political reason but just to fuck up loathsome PR firms trolling forums.

      I think Dr Jill Stein is the far better candidate better than Bernie Sanders and the even the Libertarian candidate is better than the other two. Perhaps the independents can throw the whole thing into chaos and ensure the other two are knocked out of the running. The Hillary Clinton paid trolls are certainly seem to be trying to make it happen in their clumsy right wing propaganda style. Typical of professionals trollers they are at the top of every forum thread, only to be shot down throughout the rest of the thread, so to those morons, really think you are winning, or just stinking up the place and losing.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    25. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by ogdenk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She was a big supporter of TPP until she flipped recently for the purpose of vote whoring. She'll flip again. Her and her husband supported that whole "Clipper Chip" fiasco and she is clearly anti-encryption. She supports criminalizing "hate speech". She supported CA's draconian 3-strikes BS. She absolutely hates the 2nd amendment. She's stated in the past that she'd happily engage in gun confiscation given half a chance.

      Basically, she's an anti-liberty statist who has absolutely no qualms against screwing over anyone and everyone when it's convenient for her.

      And don't think I'm saying Trump is better, he's not and I don't believe for a second he'll do anything about situations like TFA states. There's a reason the Libertarians are polling in the double digits and that can only be a good thing.

    26. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by bmo · · Score: 1

      >Bernie is telling everyone, "free everything"

      No he's not, and this meme needs to die.

      And if you believe the meme, you're a moron.

      --
      BMO

    27. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      I'm tempted to ask for sources to back up what you're claiming. But I think I'm good with you just clarifying your thoughts. Thanks for the response.

    28. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by footNipple · · Score: 1

      Maybe not "free everything", but I do like to call him:

      Venezuela Bernie...The reality has a nice ring to it, don't you think?

    29. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Better question: which branch ENFORCES the laws?

      As in, it's already illegal to hire an Indian, er, H1-B, when an American is available. Clearly that's the case here and everywhere else. Why do we keep reading about people training their foreign replacements when it's not supposed to be happening, and why aren't executives in jail already?

    30. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem with your logic, is that assumes the rest of the world sees both of the candidates in the same way.

      Pro tip, the rest of the world sees Donald as a danger to the entire fucking planet. Shooting policy decisions from the hip when you are potus causes markets to shift.
      Donald as potus will paint Americans as actually stupid, and dangerously unreliable.
      Hillary may result in the same choices being made, but will look from the outside like America is actually stable at least.

    31. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Trump is basically Ronald Reagan. If he wins, thirty years from now, every Republican will espouse whatever bulls**t economic theory he comes up with, even though it will only be about five years before economists prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it did more harm than good.

      And just like with Reagan, once again, checks and balances will work, proving that the President doesn't have nearly as much power or influence as most people running for President seem to believe, and rendering his 4–8 years mostly harmless in the grand scheme of things.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    32. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      ...Trump keeps saying he'll do something about it.

      Yeah, and what he'll do is expand it. Trump loves the whole H-1B idea, and he's said so repeatedly.

      Trump: “I’m in favor of people coming into this country legally. And you know what? They can have it any way you want. You can call it visas, you can call it work permits, you can call it anything you want...."

      Trump: "We need highly skilled people in this country, and if we can’t do it, we’ll get them in. But, and we do need in Silicon Valley, we absolutely have to have."

      Trump’s answer during the Megyn Kelly interview was consistent with his answer during the CNBC debate. He said again that Silicon Valley needs highly skilled workers, and showed his support for the H-1B program. Further, he appeared to support employers sponsoring H-1B workers for green cards, saying, “We absolutely have to be able to keep the brain power in this country.”

      Also, he said, “I know the H-1B. I know the H2B. Nobody knows it better than me. I’m a businessman. These are laws. These are regulations. These are rules. We’re allowed to do it. I will take advantage of it; they’re the laws. But I’m the one that knows how to change it. Nobody else on this dais knows how to change it like I do, believe me.”

      I'm not sure how you got modded insightful; you do know that one way to stop the H1B abuse would be to "expand" immigration law so that H1B workers are less tied to their employer than currently, right? From what you posted above, it seems you agree with Trump, only you don't realise it.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    33. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by lgw · · Score: 2

      The stock market is not the economy. The economy is not the stock market. That may not be the single most important lesson in investing, but it's up there.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    34. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      No he's not, and this meme needs to die.

      And if you believe the meme, you're a moron.

      It is no less accurate than what people say about Trump...

      If you want a dose of reality, try reading this:

      http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1...

      None of us are actually that good at this game. :)

    35. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

      Except he's an idiot global warming denier so what he says and does won't be harmless. I don't like Clinton but at least she's got big ideas about dealing with global warming.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    36. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Even libertarians recognize you can't have outright fraud between parties or the whole system breaks down. This includes between property owners and the government.

      Trump is indirectly stealing from everyone else, because if he pays less taxes, other people have to pay more.

    37. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bernie's "free everything" has a funding plan that pays for all of it, and doesn't grow the debt. Only his haters imply the plan can't work, when it's about the same as everyone else's, with just a few numbers changed.

      Including the point where he says he'll get 5% growth? Jeb Bush at one point was promising 4%, and people thought he was nuts.

    38. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Reaganomics saved this country, you sir have no idea what you're talking about! As the Great Gipper said, “How can a president not be an actor?". -Support the troops! Bring them home!

    39. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by sociocapitalist · · Score: 4, Informative

      IIRC, Bernie's plan was "significantly increase taxes on the middle class", which might actually work, assuming the economy doesn't tank as a result of the taxes. I like his honesty. When politicians say "tax the rich" what they always mean is "increase taxes on the middle class", but people keep falling for that lie.

      You could have taken three seconds to check before making such an inaccurate statement.

      https://berniesanders.com/issu...

      Bernie is the only sane hope for change at this time.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    40. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      There's a larger point to be made here.

      Let's review our basic civics classes from back in elementary school and ask ourselves the test question. "What are the three branches of American government?"

      Then let's ask ourselves which branch of government makes laws and provides for funding of issues like monitoring Muslims, building Walls, deporting 11 million people, kicking the fuck out of ISIS, changing tax laws, or even making America great again?

      Doesn't matter because Trump would build walls around the other two branches (and make them pay for it).

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    41. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      This sort of thing is also part of economic growth. It's why we can all afford our nice cars, computers, and medical care, instead of living in brick or wood houses with zero insulation, no electricity, no running water, and wood heat fueled by logs we chop down ourselves.

      The massive reduction of the agricultural workforce has lead us from a world where the average working-class family pays 43% of their income for food in 1900 (38% of workforce is farm workers) to 30% of their income in 1950 (12.2% of the workforce is farm workers) to 11% of their income today (under 2% of the workforce is farm workers). In 1790, 90% of the labor force was farm workers, and anyone who wasn't rich hunted and grew their own food to supplement what little they could buy; the *really* mega-rich could afford to charter a horse and carriage for a ride across town, while everyone else had to load up a donkey with panniers and walk.

      In 1983, the first commercial cell phones were available for $4,000 (over $9,000 today), with service priced such that simple voice calling for 2 hours per week would cost $250/month ($550/month today). What workers do you think got excessed to bring us cheap cell phone service, and then allow for the growth of better, more widely-distributed services and, ultimately, higher-speed services as we found ways to implement newer technology without involving so many workers in producing it?

      That's right: a combination of manufacture workers and IT workers. Manufacturing with a 10% yield means paying 10 times as many workers to get the same number of working units of a product as if you have a 100% yield; and tons of IT management means you have to pay all these IT workers to supply a service. Those costs make up the basic price you must charge to sell a product--hence why middle-class plebs can't have expensive rich-people luxuries, yet those luxuries become common, every-day commodities even the poorest of poor carry around with them just one generation later: we get rid of a lot of the wage workers in the production chain, and the minimum price comes down, and then market forces ranging from simple inflation to inter-market competition pull the prices toward that.

      That kind of thing has lifted scarcity throughout human history, resulting in an increase in population (we'd run out of food with more than 3.5 billion humans on earth in 1920; hunter-gatherers would strip the planet bare at somewhere between 0.068 billion and 0.136 billion), a decrease in poverty (the poorest of poor have gained a higher standard-of-living, and welfare became possible), and changing employment sectors (IT services was not a huge sector in the 1790s).

      At the end of the day, "Acting Presidential" is less important to the average person than not having their job outsourced overseas.

      If we brought all the manufacture jobs from China back to America, Americans would be able to afford fewer products because those products would be more expensive. Seriously, we have 5.6% UE4 (that's UE3 plus discouraged workers--people who would and could take a job if offered, but gave up looking), so we don't have a major gap in the workforce to fill. Besides that, you can't fill the gap that way: the Chinese worker is $3.50/hr, and the American is $7.25/hr (Federal minimum); the goods are twice as expensive to manufacture, and still have to go through per-unit continental shipping (trucking industry), logistics (distribution), warehousing, marketing, and retail.

      With the added expense, Americans can buy fewer units. The same amount of money is in the system: it's the same total income per year, because it's the same total consumer spending, which continues to grow by debt and Federal money issue at the same rate. That fact is usually missed in minimum wage arguments (people imagine taking money from the broad consumer base--the people already spending money--and concentrating it in fewer consumer hands by MAKING THINGS MORE EXPENSIVE is going to somehow create mo

    42. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1
    43. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how you got modded insightful;

      Then maybe you should think about it, because how it happened it seems fairly straightforward to me.

      -

      you do know that one way to stop the H1B abuse would be to "expand" immigration law so that H1B workers are less tied to their employer than currently, right? From what you posted above, it seems you agree with Trump, only you don't realise it.

      No, I don't realize that, because it's not true. Expanding immigration law so that H1B workers are less tied to their employer would mean that more H-1B visas are issued, unless you have some radical definition of "expand" that actually means "reduce".

      The H-1B visa program should be radically reduced, not expanded.

      Here's an anecdote: I'm selling my wife's car. One of the potential buyers is an Indian guy, about 30 years old. He's working here on an H-1B in the Seattle/Redmond area as a Java API programmer for Disney.

      Now ask yourself: do you really think that there are no qualified American programmers who know Java, in Seattle or Redmond of all places? Did Disney really have to go all the way to India and import this guy just so they could have someone who can code in Java? Was there really not a single American programmer who could do what he's doing?

      Of course not, and we both fucking know it. The H-1B program is a fucking scam designed to allow employers to import cheap labor at the expense of Americans who could do the job but who would want to be paid more. That's all it fucking is, and everyone knows it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    44. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      <quote>So the choice is to make them overseas or don't make them at all.</quote>

      In this case ( and others ), the company had the workers, was presumably profitable, and the company elected to outsource anyway.
      So, I am not convinced this argument flys always.

      <quote>The problem is you are now paying tariffs and more money for the items.</quote>

      You are not paying tariffs, by definition.  You are paying ( more, I will certainly grant you ) for the items, but you are paying that within your economy.
      At levels consistent with the cost of other goods in your economy
      ( this is what the turkeys pushing for outsourcing dont get, not only do you loose someone paid enough to afford the expensive goods you are trying to sell ( here, because, by definition, they cant afford them where you are outsourcing to ), but you are performing wage arbitrage.  Sounds good to them "cheap wages now, and later on too!", but you cant sell at the price points you want, because you pushed money out of your local system ( and if you believe the other countries participating will reciprocate, I have a unicorn to sell you ) and made less available to yourself.  All because you think "ill have an extra helping now, screw those who come after me". )

      <quote>This is the problem with trying to centrally plan an economy.</quote>

      Why bring in "central planning"?  There is a lot of area between "all planned at the top" and "nothing planned at the top".

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    45. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      #FeelTheJohnson

      Wow, that didn't sound right man. I think I will stay away as that can mean something you do not intend to mean

    46. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by lgw · · Score: 1

      Trump is indirectly stealing from everyone else, because if he pays less taxes, other people have to pay more.

      Spoken like a true communist. The other possibility, that we don't need so much government and with less money the government might tighten its belt, that idea can't even fit in your head, can it?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    47. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by tsqr · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with closing corporate tax loopholes, reducing corporate subsidies, and increasing corporate taxes in general; however, it's naive to think that those measures would not increase the prices for consumer goods and services provided by corporations whose taxes suddenly take a massive hike. So not an explicit increase in taxes for the general public, but the same effect.

    48. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by plague911 · · Score: 1

      So what? Did you not at least read the post you are responding to? The OP clearly spelled it out for you. Even if you are obviously lying about doing something about it you'll gain a lot of supporters. (Hint he is lying, but its better than nothing on the topic)

    49. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      While true it is because no one who could realistically do anything about it has the stones to do so. About the only thing the workers could do would be to file wrongful termination lawsuits but I don't know if they would have standing to do so. Assuming they don't (it probably isn't age, sex, race, religion, disability, etc related the likely don't) then it would have to fall to some State or Federal Attorney General and they like those campaign contributions.

      When I see stuff like this happening I like to remind people that both major political parties do not have your interests at heart. Yes republicans are painted as the party of Big Business but deomcrats are all for this shit. Especially one of my shit stains of a senator Amy Klobuchar who is against well paid skilled labor for Americans and is hard at work trying to destroy these jobs.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    50. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      This sort of bogus "there's really no significant difference between them" is the reason we got to the situation you describe. There's no denying that the country has been tilted sharply to the right since Reagan got in. That's been done through a combination of

          1. phony 'economic theory' claiming that tax cuts pay for themselves
          2. playing off of people's discomfort with cultural change - in areas of sexuality, but yes, mainly in the area of racial equality
          3. using some examples of government inefficiency to promote the idea that government is 'always the problem'

      These tactics have been remarkably effective, and yes, the Democrats have been sucked rightward in order to compete for votes. But if nothing else, the dueling Trump/Sanders narratives this time have shown that the Republican strategy has run out of gas, and contradicting it head on has far fewer consequences than politicians have been trained to imagine. So Clinton may actually push for - and accomplish - a few left-ish things, and certainly will get more left-leaning Supreme Court picks confirmed than Trump, who probably would nominate knee-jerk business friendly judges in the first place. Hell, Obama got Sotomayor through, and Bill Clinton got Ginsberg. What makes you think Republican obstructionism will continue to work once it loses them the Senate.

      But hey, don't let any of that get in the way of your 'at least Trump will shake up the establishment' fantasy. Those are the words of someone who thinks he has nothing personal at stake. I'd suggest you think again...

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    51. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      But a whole lot of people are tired of this and Trump keeps saying he'll do something about it

      Canadian here.

      Honest question: Has Trump said things that are pro-union? Has he spoken out against Governors that want to suppress unions in "right-to-work" states?

      Cause the way to prevent (or at least slow down) this sort of thing would be via unionization.

    52. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that H-1B visas are not necessarily a bad idea, in fact they are a very good idea, and keeping that talent an even better one. The problem is that the program seems to be HEAVILY abused, and either the regulation is weak and needs to be much stronger, or the compliance is weak and needs to be made much stronger, or both.

      Remember the purpose of H-1B visas isn't supposed to be about replacing your expensive US workers, with cheap overseas workers. It is supposed to be used only to fill highly qualified positions where there is no local alternative. Clearly in many cases this is not happening. If the regulation was tightened to block whatever loopholes might exist, AND very large penalties assigned for breaches, AND investigation/enforcement consistently done, these would not be a problem but rather a boon.

      So if you take what he says "But I’m the one that knows how to change it. Nobody else on this dais knows how to change it like I do, believe me.", one could translate that to mean basically: I know how to fix the problem of this regulation being abused because I've abused it in the past and I know what needs to be changed to stop people from abusing it further.

      Anyway here is how 2016 seems to be shaping up: Everyone seems to hate Hillary, and Everyone seems to think Trump is Crazy. OK now vote: Hate VS Crazy!

    53. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Bernie is telling everyone, "free everything", and he couldn't do that either, even if he wanted to.

      Bernie's "free everything" plan has a documented funding mechanism behind it based on changing taxation models.

      Trump's "Jobs for everyone" plan appears to have zero actual explanations behind it.

    54. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by GlennC · · Score: 1

      I don't like Clinton but at least she's got big words pandering to those concerned about dealing with global warming.

      FTFY

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    55. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that H-1B visas are not necessarily a bad idea, in fact they are a very good idea, ... The problem is that the program seems to be HEAVILY abused

      Yes, I know. But expanding the program will only lead to more abuse. The H-1B was supposed to be a very selective, very restricted program, and as you point out, now it's abused routinely. It needs to be scaled way, way back to its original levels, more or less.

      So if you take what he says "But I’m the one that knows how to change it. Nobody else on this dais knows how to change it like I do, believe me.", one could translate that to mean basically

      Yeah, sure, you could translate it to mean that, you could translate it to mean anything you want, but given his nature, past performance, predatory business practices, and previous use of the H-1B program, I doubt that's what he'd do. Like any politician he'll say anything to get elected, but I think in this case it's easy to see where he would go with it seeing as he's a big fan of it and has used it to his own benefit for years and years.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    56. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      While the the person to whom you were originally responding I have an interesting idea that I have offered up to my dumb congress critters. It does make some assumptions (all the wrong ones) but seems like it would be substantially more resilient to abuse than the current system.

      Assumption 1: Lets take the managers at their word and there is a shortage of IT workers
      Assumption 2: Lets take the managers at their word that there isn't a single US citizen that can do these jobs
      Assumption 3: Lets take the managers at their work that the skills they need are so critical that they can't train a US citizen in time
      So given these 3 assumptions (I said I was going to make all of the wrong ones didn't I) this would indicate that these people that they are bringing in on H-1B visas are truly exceptional people. I mean they have skills that are so critical that a company cannot find a single person in a country of over 300 million people that has those skills or could be trained up in time. As such I say that these people need to be compensated at levels appropriate for their skill set which seems only fair as they are at least a 1 in 300 million and companies can run with persons missing form the executive board so these are truly exceptional people. As such these individuals should be receiving the highest total compensation in the entire company including benefits. This means the best insurance coverages, wages, stock options, company transport, company provided housing, relocation funds, retirement packages, etc. Remember the companies say they desperately need these people and don't have time to train a US worker so they are obviously more critical than anyone in management or sales. To avoid some possible doggedness make it so that this compensation is the highest one calculated from the company they are employed by or are doing work for.

      Do this and I say that we can remove the cap on H-1B visas. We will then see just how critical these people are to companies.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    57. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Wow.... you really don't know a joke when you see one do you? That is certainly not the official slogan heh

    58. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      There's a stark difference between outsourcing jobs and importing more foreign workers under a visa program. In one case the government is still getting tax revenue from people with jobs in the country. In the other, it isn't. Whatever your stance on the H1-B visa program, it's obviously preferable to bring in someone to take a job here than it is to export that job there. It would be better still to education and train citizens than either, but with a global economy there's going to be economic osmosis.

    59. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I don't much like Trump, but I like this. Everyone should pay the least taxes they legally can."

      Think of it for a moment. Just think of it.

      In fact, everybody *already* pay the least taxes they legally can. Now, the problem is what happens when you are on wages versus what happens when you are on capital gains. Again, think of it, and you'll see such an assertion is both a platitude and a scam.

    60. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      This means the best insurance coverages, wages, stock options, company transport, company provided housing, relocation funds, retirement packages, etc. Remember the companies say they desperately need these people and don't have time to train a US worker so they are obviously more critical than anyone in management or sales. To avoid some possible doggedness make it so that this compensation is the highest one calculated from the company they are employed by or are doing work for.

        Do this and I say that we can remove the cap on H-1B visas. We will then see just how critical these people are to companies.

      Works for me. If they're so incredibly rare and skilled, they should be paid like kings and queens.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    61. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I know it was a rhetorical questions, but the answer is simple; it's because those that are supposed to be enforcing existing laws are bribed by others whom have everything to gain by breaking them.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    62. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      There's a stark difference between outsourcing jobs and importing more foreign workers under a visa program. In one case the government is still getting tax revenue from people with jobs in the country. In the other, it isn't. Whatever your stance on the H1-B visa program, it's obviously preferable to bring in someone to take a job here than it is to export that job there. It would be better still to education and train citizens than either, but with a global economy there's going to be economic osmosis.

      Spoken like a true manager whose only concern is the bottom line and whose job is in no danger of being outsourced or replaced by an H-1B visa worker.

      Bravo, sir, well played!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    63. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Sure I prefer Bernie but it doesn't look like the Democrats are going to let him be leader.

      Trump: whilst it would be quiet entertaining to watch this idiot try and run the most powerful country on the planet, I am an environmentalist and he would do he best to wreck the environment according to what he's said so far.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    64. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Part of what happened would be reduced corporate profits, not increased cost to consumers. The downside of that is that it makes it harder to get a successful business going.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    65. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, the Greek economy is pretty successful at what their German financial masters want it to do.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    66. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The Republicans have made the government run on less money, but haven't been successful at making it tighten its belt.

      OK. Do you believe we need some form of government? Do you believe it needs to get money somehow to operate? Do you think it should get money from citizens in ways that are more or less fair? In that case, apparently you're a true communist.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    67. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The replaced workers may have standing, but they'd likely lose some good termination benefits by suing. (If I'm ever asked again to sign something promising not to sue when being laid off, I'm consulting a lawyer first.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    68. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The H-1B isn't just a way to import cheap labor. It's a way to import semi-slave labor. If an employee has the choice between putting up with whatever crap the employer pulls or going home, the employee can be cheated and underpaid. Bring in a competent guy from India on a visa that's not tied to a particular employer, and that guy can stand up for his legal rights and look for jobs where he'll be paid better and treated more fairly. Suddenly the H-1B isn't cheap labor, since he can go somewhere he can be paid better.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    69. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      This sort of thing is also part of economic growth.

      Tell that to the millions of Americans who either don't have a job, or are under employed... or who are in the process of being "right-sized".

      Frankly, they don't care which is why thousands show up to every Trump rally.

      The massive reduction of the agricultural workforce has lead us from a world where the average working-class family pays 43% of their income for food in 1900 (38% of workforce is farm workers) to 30% of their income in 1950 (12.2% of the workforce is farm workers) to 11% of their income today (under 2% of the workforce is farm workers). In 1790, 90% of the labor force was farm workers, and anyone who wasn't rich hunted and grew their own food to supplement what little they could buy; the *really* mega-rich could afford to charter a horse and carriage for a ride across town, while everyone else had to load up a donkey with panniers and walk.

      Yes, but the end game is approaching...

      Humans Need Not Apply
      https://youtu.be/7Pq-S557XQU

      You REALLY should watch that... while not everything may come true there, it doesn't all have to. If half of it comes true, then the old system won't work anymore.

      e. Seriously, we have 5.6% UE4 (that's UE3 plus discouraged workers--people who would and could take a job if offered, but gave up looking), so we don't have a major gap in the workforce to fill.

      Those numbers are complete crap. If you believe them, then there is no way for us to have a conversation, because we are coming at this from different angles.

      Real unemployment isn't as high as Trump claims, it isn't 22%, but it is a hell of a lot higher than 5.6%.

      I can categorically get a new job in a stronger economy. Labor replacement is a part of growth by technical progress.

      You might be able to, but not everyone will.

      Walmart is planning to replace their warehouse workers with drones. Amazon is already doing it. Wendy's is replacing thousands of employees, etc. etc.

      BTW, if you watch the above video, take note of Baxter... GE uses over 100 Baxter robots today, right now, to assemble those large street lamps for cities. They used to employ dozens of people to do that job, now replaced by robots.

      The number of people needed to maintain and build robots will be a tiny fraction of the number employed today.

    70. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Honest question: Has Trump said things that are pro-union? Has he spoken out against Governors that want to suppress unions in "right-to-work" states?

      No, not that I've heard...

      Cause the way to prevent (or at least slow down) this sort of thing would be via unionization.

      It was, back in the 70s and maybe 80s... It wouldn't help today... Unions have been discovering that they have little real power left, when they put their foot down, they have been losing.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05...

      The Union claimed victory, as they always do, but if you really read it, they lost.

      Not in the short term, but in the long term. Verizon will now work over the next 4 years to adjust their business to marginalize the workers.

      This comment is telling:

      The unions say the company is more than profitable enough â" with nearly $18 billion in net income last year â" to support a large work force with good benefits and wages.

      They say that Verizonâ(TM)s fiber-optic Fios network, which provides telephone, video and Internet service, remains lucrative. But they argue that the companyâ(TM)s interest in it has flagged because the labor costs are much higher than for its wireless business, which is overwhelmingly nonunion.

      So Verizon makes money on FIOS, but because it is union, they don't make AS MUCH MONEY as they do on wireless, which is non-union.

      Verizon does not care about the employees or the unions, they only care about shareholders. If you want this to change, supporting "unions" won't help, we live in a global world today. The only way to fix this is to change how corporations work, that would require the laws be changed.

    71. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by faw872 · · Score: 1

      Not even the fact he considers failure (i.e bankruptcy) his first option rather than the last will dissuade those who are pissed a black guy is in office, the stock market is at its highest levels ever, all the jobs lost by the last president have been recovered and then some and gas prices are low. All they want to hear are platitudes and bloviating from a white guy who is on his third marriage.

      Smooth Wombat,This was fine until the last paragraph. Obama is only half black and I'm sure many are bothered by the race of our president, but it's only speculative. If it was John Kerry doing and saying the same things, I doubt the approval rating would change at a noticeable amount. Very recently I've seen a few people touting how great everything is now thanks to Obama, but I would disagree. There are countless aspects to consider and books could be written about these topics. How many trillions of debt have we piled on under Obama that we will never recover from? All of that debt is propping up our image on the short term, but hosing us and our children in the long term. Given how careless I've seen many people are with money, I'm not surprised we elect fiscal irresponsible people to represent us. Just tax the rich more? In 2012?, you could tax the rich at 100% and it wouldn't have covered the deficit. Given our recent record tax revenue and continued deficit, we obviously have a spending problem. The stock market is a complex world with many factors influencing it. To give credit to one man is a bit exaggerated, especially given Congress has changed power during that time. Dow Jones was around 12600 when Dems took control of Congress in January 2007. It down to about 8000 when Obama came in. It dropped as low as 7000 in the following weeks. When republicans took over the House side of Congress it was at about 11800. It's at 17800 now. Based on the numbers, you can't really draw any conclusions. In 2008 the numbers would point to the democrats being the problem, but that alone would be a naive conclusion. The market is influenced by many things, such as the value of the dollar, investing in foreign markets, bonds, taking money out of real estate, corporate profits, etc. For example, because interest rates are so low, someone in retirement might switch from a traditional, safer, but abnormally low return to a riskier investment like the stock market because they are seeing less money coming in. The low interest rates are another example of a feeling of false wealth. They haven't gone up since Obama came into office. Gas prices are low now, but if you compare the average between Bush and Obama, it was actually lower on average under Bush. Last, but not least, you hear that unemployment is down. That can be a good thing, but the labor participation rate has actually decreased. http://data.bls.gov/timeseries... I am not a Trump or Bush supporter.

    72. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Bernie's "free everything" plan has a documented funding mechanism behind it based on changing taxation models.

      Which the experts say wouldn't actually fund it...

      Further, he has exactly zero chance of having those tax changes passed, so it is a moot point...

      Trump, being a Republican, actually has a chance to get tax changes passed. If you want to see tax reform, support him. Otherwise the House (which will remain in Republican hands) will not work with a Democrat on taxes.

      You can debate if that is a "good thing" or not, as someone once said, "I'm not telling you how I feel, I'm telling you which way the wind is blowing".

    73. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by lgw · · Score: 1

      No, there's a middle ground, where we have somewhat less government and somewhat lower taxes. That's what we should be seeking.

      The only way the tax system can actually be fair is a flat tax, but with the current convoluted nonsense the only rational approach is to pay as little as you legally can. Suggesting you should pay more than you have to suggests you desire a bigger government, so much that you're willingly throwing money at it so that it can do more. Call that whichever kind of totalitarianism you like, whether communism or some other -ism.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    74. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well fuck me. Apparently Slashdot is now so far left that suggesting that people can hate Obama for reasons other than "he's Black" makes me a troll.

      It's one thing to disagree with those reasons, but it's borderline insane to assert that no one holds them sincerely.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    75. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by lgw · · Score: 1

      Also keep in mind that $2000 more in taxes while no longer needing to spend $4000/year on health insurance actually gives the middle class more money.

      Fantasy and fairy dust. We can't afford medicare as it is -- the unfunded liability is something like $240,000 per taxpayer already, no way we're paying that -- "medicare for everyone" is a fiscal non-starter.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    76. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by misanthropic.mofo · · Score: 1

      Because if you look closely none of the companies replacing American workers with H1Bs are doing so directly. They all contract with staffing solutions providers in order to jump through a loop hole. It costs the company less to pay the contract price for all the workers they want than it does to pay for each individual American worker. It's just too bad that more entities don't hang themselves when making their way through hoops and loopholes to increase their bottom line, get their fat bonus, and give everyone else involved a big rubbery one up the poop shoot.

      --
      --There are two kinds of people in this world. I don't like either of them.
    77. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Bring in a competent guy from India on a visa that's not tied to a particular employer, and that guy can stand up for his legal rights and look for jobs where he'll be paid better and treated more fairly.

      Why not just hire people who are already here, like American workers?

      Do you really think there aren't enough Americans who a) need a job, and b) can write Java?

      Not to put too fine a point on it, but we fucking invented Java, chances are there are plenty of people right here right now who can fill those jobs. But that's not what it's about, is it? It's about cheap labor. And for that matter, why in the world should we give preference to foreign contracting companies when there are American workers who can do the work?

      If I really believed that Trump was telling the truth when he talked about reducing the H-1B program, I'd say "bully for him!" But I don't believe him- he likes the H-1B program and wants to expand it for his own benefit. .

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    78. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      A certain amount of money is needed. Outright fraud causes even the most libertarian and laissez faire government to fail. So you think anyone that thinks everyone should have to pay the taxes they owe - so taxes don't have to be raised on everyone, which just hits the people actually paying taxes instead of evading them harder - makes one a communist. I see why slashdot is dying.

    79. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Bernie's "free everything" has a funding plan that pays for all of it, and doesn't grow the debt.

      He has a 'plan', sure. But it's not at all clear that it won't drive us deeper in debt - because most of his funding plans revolve around raising taxes that won't take many years to trickle down to the middle class. Who won't stand one minute for it, left or right.
       

      Only his haters imply the plan can't work, when it's about the same as everyone else's, with just a few numbers changed.

      o.0 Do you even realize what you just said - or have you really drunk so deeply of the kool-aide that you've taken leave of the ability to write and comprehend simple English? (Hint: What you just said is "Only his haters question his plan, even though it's different from everyone else's".)

      That's setting aside the level of reality distortion involved in classifying everyone who questions The Messiah as a "hater".

    80. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Union on the wireless side would level the playing field.

    81. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you think that there are mechanisms by which healthcare costs can be cut in half, I suggest applying for the CEO position at your nearest hospital. There are some efficiencies to be wrung out of the system, but there aren't many. If you quit paying doctors anything - if they were slaves forced to feed and house themselves on income outside of their medical work, and every employee they have was forced to do the same, and all the property owners and utility companies that provided them with clinic space and services were forced to do it for free - you could cut 20% off our healthcare costs. TANSTAAFL. Also, good luck finding doctors after you do that.

    82. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Union on the wireless side would level the playing field.

      Or it would just cost those people their jobs in the long run, as Verizon moved on to something else, somewhere else.

      Even Ford, which has "worked with" their Unions for years, even avoiding BK 8 years ago...

      http://www.freep.com/story/mon...

      Can't afford to keep "working with them".

      ---

      As I said, the rules of the game mean that unions are not effective anymore, not against what corporations have become.

      Only changing the rules of the game will help.

    83. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Reagan prosperity lasted till the end of Clinton's second term. When Clinton's .com bubble ended it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    84. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Tax revenues did in fact raise after the Reagan tax cuts. But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

      Sanders? A loser reactionary (wanting to return to the politics of the 1930s) that isn't changing anything. He is just the millennial's youthful folly. They will look back on him like Boomers look back on their hippydom...'How could we have been so naive?' Of course there are the truly brainless, who still believe.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    85. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In other words. He want's to pay them with taxes he can't collect.

      Capital moves to where it gets the best rate of return. All he will do is send capital overseas. We already knew he was an idiot, so no surprises.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    86. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      there will still be people whose objective is to pay as little as they can, no matter what.

      These people are called 'sane'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    87. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's already illegal to run a construction site with 100% illegal immigrant workers.

      But at least 50% are and there is no way to get any enforcement.

      H1B are just displacing better paid Americans, but it's the same deal.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    88. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha...you can't be serious. Countries with 'Free college' also have 'strict admission standards'. Far fewer Bernie supporters would be in college if they had to compete for the spot vs. have mom and dad pay for 4 years of babysitting (aka a modern liberal arts degree).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    89. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with closing corporate tax loopholes, reducing corporate subsidies, and increasing corporate taxes in general; however, it's naive to think that those measures would not increase the prices for consumer goods and services provided by corporations whose taxes suddenly take a massive hike. So not an explicit increase in taxes for the general public, but the same effect.

      No, I disagree.

      Corporations (and other business forms) base pricing to maximize profit which is more about what people are willing to pay than it is about costs. Costs will, of course, be minimized in order to maximize profits but supply and demand will result in a given price point that cannot be exceeded.

      Anyway it's better than what we have at the moment where profits are shuffled out of the country and everyone except the very wealthy loses.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    90. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Part of what happened would be reduced corporate profits, not increased cost to consumers. The downside of that is that it makes it harder to get a successful business going.

      Not necessarily. There's nothing saying that startups (especially SMEs) couldn't benefit from reduced taxes for a certain amount of time, or until a certain revenue point is reached. This is what's done here in France to offset the admittedly heavy taxes here.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    91. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      In other words. He want's to pay them with taxes he can't collect.

      Capital moves to where it gets the best rate of return. All he will do is send capital overseas. We already knew he was an idiot, so no surprises.

      Your point is irrelevant, given that any company who can send profits overseas is already doing so. It is easy to collect taxes from any company that wants to do business in a country. The only thing stopping that from happening so far is that the companies in question own the politicians who make the laws, and the loopholes, that are used to avoid paying tax.

      With regard to his being an idiot, well...pot..kettle, glass houses and all that. Of course your inability to realize that you're being fucked in every financial orifice already by these companies and that Trump and Clinton are buyer and bought, and are thus part of the problem and not any kind of solution, doesn't point to you having a genius level intellect, but hey...I could be wrong.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    92. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I keep writing my congress critters suggesting this and even use that wording but Representative John Kline, Senator Amy Klobuchar, and Senator Al Franken don't seem to want to hear that and none have ever responded back to me on the issue. With Senator Amy Klobuchar I do feel the need to point out that she supports increased H-1B visas as many people in my state support her and believe that she actually supports workers and would never support this even though she has been one of the biggest supporters of expanding the program.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    93. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the millions of Americans who either don't have a job, or are under employed... or who are in the process of being "right-sized".

      You mean the 5.6% UE4 unemployment, which is less than the 10% we had around 2010? It's below where Bush had it in 2003, and it's below where Obama had it mid-2008.

      Those numbers are complete crap. If you believe them, then there is no way for us to have a conversation, because we are coming at this from different angles.

      Explain.

      You REALLY should watch that... while not everything may come true there, it doesn't all have to.

      I've watch HNNA, and it's a scare piece like Michael Moore's work.

      Walmart is planning to replace their warehouse workers with drones. Amazon is already doing it. Wendy's is replacing thousands of employees, etc. etc.

      Farmers are replacing good, able-bodied Americans with tractors. Factories are replacing good line workers with industrial machines. Welcome to 1920.

      You seem to not understand that we enjoy running water, cars, airplanes, in-house heating, and food that we can *buy* for a fraction of our income instead of spending nearly every penny we have *and* having our own half-acre farm because technology eliminated a whole bunch of jobs.

    94. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The law already says that an H-1B can't be used to do something a US worker can do. It would be nice to enforce it.

      However, one big reason for using H-1Bs is that it allows importation of workers who essentially can't protest about their treatment. Bringing in a competent guy from India is a lot more tempting if you can underpay and overwork him, less so if he can find another job easily if he doesn't like how he's treated.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    95. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The law already says that an H-1B can't be used to do something a US worker can do. It would be nice to enforce it.

      Agreed. The entire spirit (if not the letter) of the law has been completely subverted for profit and expediency, as usual.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    96. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The state does its own valuation of properties. If you don't own a house, you may not even know how the system works...the change in tax valuation of a property is also capped by law to prevent wild swings in property values caused by the bubbles. I highly doubt that Trump could get the state to even update the value of his properties if he tried, and frankly, why should he? Would you tell your state that your house is really worth 2 times what they say it is worth on your tax assessment? I don't think I could get the state to update the numbers if I tried.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    97. Re: This sort of thing is why people like Trump by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Just like Obama and Clinton did...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    98. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Capital is not profit you dimwit, in the long term it is integrated retained profit. Capital is needed to make profits. People with capital have choices. Unless you can make a living banging two rocks together you depend on somebodies capital.

      It's easy for leftists to expropriate. Taxing overseas profits under the rule of law is very difficult, attempts have unintended consequences. None are as bad as the unintended consequences of expropriation.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    99. Re:This sort of thing is why people like Trump by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Capital is not profit you dimwit, in the long term it is integrated retained profit. Capital is needed to make profits. People with capital have choices. Unless you can make a living banging two rocks together you depend on somebodies capital.

      It's easy for leftists to expropriate. Taxing overseas profits under the rule of law is very difficult, attempts have unintended consequences. None are as bad as the unintended consequences of expropriation.

      Actually the two rocks would also be capital but whatever.

      If a company chooses not to re-invest their gains, then it is profit and not capital. With the huge amounts of profits going offshore, that is less potential capital in the economy of the country that the profits are being funneled out of.

      Again you're missing the point (which is not very surprising really). The profits in question are not 'overseas' profits. They are profits on sales in (relatively) high tax countries that have been double dutched out to low tax countries. The companies doing the double dutch dance use public infrastructure in many ways (from having an educated workforce paid for by tax dollars to using public roads to doing business safely thanks to publicly funded policy and military, etc. etc. the list goes on and on) and yet do not pay back into the system that they benefit from, leaving the burden more and more on the middle class.

      Funneling wealth out of a society using tax loopholes is just another form of expropriation - by corporations and the super wealthy instead of by a public agency - and instead of you and your family getting at least some value out of it...you get fuck all.

      You consider taxes to be expropriation and yet how else do you reasonably expect a country to fund things like the military, the government, public education, healthcare and welfare at least for those who are unable to work? Or are you one of these fucknuts who thinks that with no taxes things would be just fine and everything would be privately funded?

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  2. The most disgusting part.. by subk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..Is that the company's sales are up 15% from 2015, and "represents the 10th consecutive year of record results".

    Greedy bastards, plain and simple.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    1. Re:The most disgusting part.. by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

      ..Is that the company's sales are up 15% from 2015, and "represents the 10th consecutive year of record results".

      Greedy bastards, plain and simple.

      There's greed, and then there's greed. Like this.

      I personally think once a company goes public, it's over. The owners cash out with a fat wad, then the company gets gutted by buzzword-spewing MBAs desperate to squeeze every penny from every possible place.

      But how to fix it? Make it illegal to outsource offshore? Or even outsource in-shore?

      It has to be stopped, I just can't think of a non-anti-competitive, blatantly xenophobic and illegal way of stopping it.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:The most disgusting part.. by subk · · Score: 1

      I doubt it was really a 40% increase in payroll.. They may have grown the amount of people drawing payroll, but I bet the per capita went down. That is just a hunch, I have no numbers..

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    3. Re:The most disgusting part.. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      ..Is that the company's sales are up 15% from 2015, and "represents the 10th consecutive year of record results".

      Greedy bastards, plain and simple.

      Keep in mind they are just playing by the rules of the game.

      The real problem is the rules, not the players.

      Change the rules...

    4. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Enforce the rules that are already in place?

      You're only supposed to be allowed H1B replacements if your current staff can't do the job. Considering they all need to be trained beyond a document of server passwords, it's obvious they are only being picked because they're cheaper.

      Enforce the rules.

    5. Re:The most disgusting part.. by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you hold yourself to the same standard? When you have reached some certain level of salary, do you give up a raise because you have earned enough and it's not reasonable for you to accept more for your efforts? Are you a greedy bastard when you advocate for a higher salary, instead of allowing a summer intern to be hired?

      I just don't buy this logic. If a corporation, operating under the rules set by the government and regulators, can increase its profit and continue providing its services, why would it not do so? I don't see in law any requirement that companies have social welfare or domestic employment goals in their incorporation requirements

      If we're unhappy with the results of this behavior, then we should set new rules. But blaming them for following the incentives we've set is silly.

    6. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Mark19960 · · Score: 1

      Hard to do when the players are the ones that make the rules to start with.
      We need to replace the whole team. Scorched earth.

    7. Re:The most disgusting part.. by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pretty much this.

      I'm in favour of making H-1B have am minimum $120-$150k salary.

      So it can only be used for skilled labour.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    8. Re:The most disgusting part.. by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      <sarcasm>But, but, but... regulations are bad. We should let the market decide....</sarcasm>

      Yeah, this falls under the category of C*Os being crooks and lying on their H1B applications. That should result in jail time for everyone involved even tangentially in the decision. Fraud is a felony.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:The most disgusting part.. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      And one day, if every company in America follows suit, then the following consecutive year the entire thing will implode.

      Because once everyone has trained their offshore replacement, no one will be able to afford their insurance.

      Not that the fat cats will care. They'll take their golden parachutes and bail, because only in Corporate America can you be paid more for being an abject failure as a top-level executive than a successful line worker could have made in a lifetime. If said worker weren't laid off first, of course.

    10. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "But how to fix it? Make it illegal to outsource offshore? Or even outsource in-shore?"

      Eliminate the whole H-1B visa peonage category. If you want to come to the US to work, come as a regular immigrant. Let there be just one category of immigration, starting with getting a permanent resident visa. This benefits you as an immigrant, because it gives you same rights everyone else has, including being able to complain without being shipped back by your overseer, and puts you on the same basis as other workers in your area.

    11. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't see in law any requirement that companies have social welfare or domestic employment goals in their incorporation requirements.

      This isn't true everywhere, and wasn't always true even in America. Certain countries, like Germany, require that board members consider the welfare of certain constituents such as employees and the public. It's a perfectly reasonable requirement, since the corporate charter grants certain benefits to the corporation that it doesn't grant to individuals. For example, incorporation protects its shareholders from liability, special tax rates, etc.

    12. Re:The most disgusting part.. by murdocj · · Score: 3, Informative

      Inflation??? are you nuts? It's running 1-2% right now, it can't get lower.

    13. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not familiar with the exact rules around h1-b visas but Australia has a visa called the 457 which allows an employer to bring someone into the country in order to perform a role that they were unable to source someone for locally. The process is not an easy one to go through and the documentation that you have to provide to the department of immigration is significant. This was a visa that I utilised to bring people into the country to work for me, so I know how hard those visas are to get.

      The process starts with the company being vetted by Immi (http://www.border.gov.au/) which takes about 6 months, the end of which you are given a maximum allocation of 457s you are allowed to have. I was given 3. Once that is completed you go through the process of submitting the person that you want to employ along with supporting evidence of the searching you have done for a local person, the training and development you have given your staff to show you are trying to develop those skills, and a huge amount of information showing that the person you want to bring in will be paid the same as what Australians working in that role are being paid. In my case I had others working in the same role so I was able to put them forward as direct comparisons along with a cross sample of adverts by others companies looking for the same people with their salaries.

      The assessment process for the applications would take about 4 weeks. Once someone started I had responsibility to cover any medical costs that they would incur and should they decide to return to the country of origin or I let them go I was responsible for full relocating them home. In addition because they already had a 457 visa they could transfer that, relatively easily, to another employer that was pre qualified. So during my time employing people on 457s I did lose one after 2 years to a different company.

      Now for how to control for abuse. In Australia you are audited by IMMI at random intervals where you have to prove that you are maintaining the requirements of the visa. This includes that the person remains being paid at parity to a domestic worker, that you aren't using the "I will send you home unless you work harder" as a stick and a couple of other conditions. If you are found in breach of ANY of those you lose your qualified status and as a result lose ALL your 457s in one go and can't hire any others for 10 years. Leaving out the cost of relocating multiple people in one go you are going to lose multiple critical staff in one go and you will find it very hard to replace them.

      If you follow these rules there is no incentive to use outside 457 labour, in fact you're better off not. So the only reason you will is if you genuinely can't find the person you need. Currently in Australia there are around 85,000 people working on 457 visas (I'm only counting the principals not their dependants who also have a right to work) out of a workforce of 12 million.

    14. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The worker's salary is a subset of the value of the work the worker produces.

      The executives' salary is a superset of the value of the work they do, the majority siphoned off of the people doing the actual value production. Their profits are largely a form of arbitrage, knowing the specifics about where and why the worker misunderstands the value of his work--not unlike trading currency between markets, while actually producing nothing.

      This is the distinction. This isn't socialism. This is reality.

    15. Re:The most disgusting part.. by lgw · · Score: 2

      How to fix the unbearable inflation? Well, get back to recognizing that gold is money

      We certainly had inflation while we were technically on the gold standard. We certainly had fractional reserve banking, and thus the ability for the Fed to manipulate the money supply, while we were on the gold standard.

      Gold is as arbitrary as anything else to assign value to as a currency, and historically has never prevented a government from watering down the currency, even when actual gold coins were used (which often became gold-ish coins over time).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:The most disgusting part.. by undefinedreference · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting idea that I could get behind... I'd say 2x prevailing wages for the skillset/title and a minimum of 2x average household income would be sufficient to make it unpalatable to use an H-1B for anything short of someone you legitimately cannot find or train. It'd also drive local wages up for anything in demand because they could save money by hiring local vs. hiring someone on a visa. It'd create fierce competition among the best and brightest all over the world to get in on the program because it'd give them instant high salaries, increase local salaries to what the market would actually bear for the skills, draw more people into unskilled work they consider below them (because they could live on the now-increased incomes), etc. It'd also kill a lot of crufty companies that aren't actively profitable in their space to make way for ones that will be. Everyone would win except MBAs trying to goose quarterly statements.

    17. Re:The most disgusting part.. by lgw · · Score: 1

      however no government can print gold and actually get away with it

      You might consider that we moved away from gold coins because "printing money" was better than the alternative: the king sends his troops around to seize all the gold, or the economy collapses for lack of enough cash to mediate barter.

      None of which matters if you have fractional reserve banking, of course, and that's not going away so the actual physical currency is almost meaningless.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:The most disgusting part.. by lgw · · Score: 2

      There's only about 10% as much printed currency as there is value in bank accounts (including CDs etc). That wouldn't change if we used gold coins instead of printed paper. Money would still be just a number in a computer, not backed by any specific bit of gold or bitcoin or whatever.

      capitalism in a free market would not allow paper money to exist as a concept because nobody would take that money.

      So you'd buy a house with a wheelbarrow full of gold, instead of a mortgage? That sounds like a dismal economy, as so few would ever manage to save that much.

      And of course the gold currency would eventually be debased, so any transaction would involve lengthy haggling over the purity of each individual coin - what fun.

      We don't need any change in our currency to end bank bailouts- that's entirely a political corruption problem, not a "what do we base out currency on" problem.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    19. Re:The most disgusting part.. by forty-2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This will continue to happen until it is a dangerous practice. Dangerous on a personal level. It continues to amaze and disappoint me that there aren't more (any?) stories of high ranking executives and officers being found mysteriously disemboweled.
      "Gee wiz, I really would like to outsource this entire department to shitfuckastan, and find the carrot juuuuust big enough to keep the staff here to train their replacement, but I sure am worried about my entire family being slowly murdered and eaten in front of me when I get home"
      I know that's not actually how the world works, but a boy can dream.

      --
      never drink kool-aid from a big vat
    20. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm in favour of making H-1B have am minimum $120-$150k salary.

      All the H1Bs I know including me started around that... give or take bonus, etc..

      However, mine and others wages are greatly under reported in the official LCA applications filed for us... So the statistics show starting salaries around 90k, he he, when in reality the median and averages salaries are a lot higher than what is reported in statistics.

    21. Re:The most disgusting part.. by The+Raven · · Score: 2

      The problem is that they are instituting a significant change to how their infrastructure is being maintained and deployed, removing experienced employees who set up and keep running the system that got them record profits and replacing them with an unknown, remote workforce that may or may not be able to do the job.

      That's where your metaphor is spot on. Do you keep the 60,000 a year employee, or hire the 30,000 a year intern? Why do so many businesses keep the employee? Because they know he can do the job.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    22. Re:The most disgusting part.. by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      The problem is the companies are fraudulently claiming they can't find enough workers (for low salaries that are not really keeping up with inflation for that kind of work) and manipulating the government to raise the H1B cap. Or, they are supposed to show they tried to find American workers first, and they fraudulently list misleading employment ads, fraudulently claim they are offering more money to the H1B than they pay, and so on. It's a scam.

    23. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      ...the incentives we've set....

      Who's this "we" you're referring to? I don't recall ever having a say in the current rules.

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    24. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      What do you mean when you say "the economy has been in the tank for the past 8 years or so."? Are you speaking overall or for only a certain subsection of the population?

    25. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      US doesnt allow Indians and Chinese to get permanent residence (unless they come in as Managers) anymore-- for India atleast, the effective waiting period for a Green card is 30+ years if you're not a manager

    26. Re:The most disgusting part.. by m00sh · · Score: 2

      Interesting idea that I could get behind... I'd say 2x prevailing wages for the skillset/title and a minimum of 2x average household income would be sufficient to make it unpalatable to use an H-1B for anything short of someone you legitimately cannot find or train. It'd also drive local wages up for anything in demand because they could save money by hiring local vs. hiring someone on a visa. It'd create fierce competition among the best and brightest all over the world to get in on the program because it'd give them instant high salaries, increase local salaries to what the market would actually bear for the skills, draw more people into unskilled work they consider below them (because they could live on the now-increased incomes), etc. It'd also kill a lot of crufty companies that aren't actively profitable in their space to make way for ones that will be. Everyone would win except MBAs trying to goose quarterly statements.

      It would backfire badly.

      They'll just hire 1 manager who will manage a team in India. So, work will move out of the country faster.

      Companies will work to make their cloud software easily managed from India.

      We are in a capitalistic country. The force of cheaper labor is going to circumvent any artificial barriers you put in.

    27. Re:The most disgusting part.. by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      How about just "do the right thing" right? It's a shame it's very difficult to litigate morality or ethics. People will always find both a reason and a workaround.

    28. Re:The most disgusting part.. by undefinedreference · · Score: 2

      I'd kind of chuckle at that. Who would buy their products? They would have no incentive to even hire the manager as there would be no point having them in the US at all.

      Cheap labor is only cheap until you have nobody to sell anything to, which happens faster the cheaper your labor.

    29. Re:The most disgusting part.. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this.

      I'm in favour of making H-1B have am minimum $120-$150k salary.

      So it can only be used for skilled labour.

      How about just doing away with the program altogether.

      The 'free market' would adjust very quickly and if companies have to wait awhile for it to adjust....so what? Let them wait.

      Need resource? Train up your people. Need more resource? Hire more people and train them up.

      Open the corporate fucking wallet and stop maximizing shareholder value at the expense of fucking over the employees who have made the company what it is today.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    30. Re:The most disgusting part.. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You do realize that layoffs remove people who aren't necessary to produce the product being sold, right? The cost of wages is the base cost of all prices; it is not business, but the consumer who pays wages.

      Labor reduction is a good thing. The labor force moves to other things. How do you think food keeps getting cheaper? From where do you think all the manufacture and services jobs came from? What money are Americans redirecting to the growing Healthcare sector to enjoy more and better healthcare?

      The average family put 43% of their income to food in 1900, with 38% of the labor force working on farms. In 1950, it was 30% of our income with 12% of our labor force on the farms (and an additional chunk in the laboratories and factories making tractors, pesticides, fertilizers, and diesel fuel to support the farm worker). Today, we spend 11% of our income on food, with under 2% of our workers on the farm. How many poor families should be starving right now so that we could have avoided the elimination of 36% of our farm labor force, and should we give up healthcare or the Internet to support these excess and unnecessary farm workers?

    31. Re:The most disgusting part.. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Do you hold yourself to the same standard? When you have reached some certain level of salary, do you give up a raise because you have earned enough and it's not reasonable for you to accept more for your efforts? Are you a greedy bastard when you advocate for a higher salary, instead of allowing a summer intern to be hired?

        I just don't buy this logic. If a corporation, operating under the rules set by the government and regulators, can increase its profit and continue providing its services, why would it not do so? I don't see in law any requirement that companies have social welfare or domestic employment goals in their incorporation requirements

        If we're unhappy with the results of this behavior, then we should set new rules. But blaming them for following the incentives we've set is silly.

      There were rules to avoid the kind of abuse that H1B brings. These rules were changed not by us but by the government who is owned by 'them' in order to allow the H1B program to start. As there is ongoing lobbying and pressure by 'them', not us, to increase the quantity of H1Bs things get worse and worse.

      So, no. We are very much justified in being angry at the weakening and removal of the existing immigration rules to allow 'them' to set their 'incentives', to use your word.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    32. Re:The most disgusting part.. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      A gold standard is patently the worst monetary system. Gold standards are deflationary: consumers become incapable of buying products like houses and cars because they can't access debt, due to debt growing over time (deflation). With the reduction in purchasing ability, the economy becomes more rigid, more risky, and less capable of creating jobs.

      The best system is a fractional reserve system on fiat money. This allows controls on inflation: we can increase the money supply with both population and technology level to avoid prices going downward, and avoid infinite lending which would lead to money supply growing too much in excess with population-Union-technology and thus causing hyperinflation.

      A zero-inflation economy is impossible because level of technology is not flat: we can improve food technology without improving medical technology, so food becomes cheaper relative to medicine; issuing more currency can get food back to its original price, and will make medicine's price increase. Inflation has to be positive or negative (deflation).

      A money supply with reasonable inflation has ... odd behaviors. Beneficial, but odd. Notably, it allows for debt.

      With inflation, debts become smaller over time. When you take a debt amortized over a long term (e.g. 30-years--note: I want to eliminate the 30-year mortgage in favor of a 10-year mortgage by taking an opportunistic approach the next time interest prime rates are ~14%), you establish an unchanging payment. At the time of origination, that payment is affordable; as time passes, inflation reduces the buying power of that payment and, in general, your income should go up (I get a 1.5%-2.5% raise each year, at least; the theory behind minimum wage increases and certain types of basic income establishes this at the base). Because the payment stays the same, it represents a smaller impact on your income over time, and a smaller amount of buying power.

      Essentially, this means the consumer is capable of buying large goods (cars, houses), creating purchasing demand in those markets, supporting jobs and providing the consumer access to luxuries outside his basic level of wealth (i.e. cars are rich-people luxuries, but I can spend half my salary for the next 5 years on one RIGHT NOW and so cars are a common good among the lower-middle-class). The consumer benefits from inflation by his obligated payment shrinking in relation to his income; this, as a general result of an increasing per-capita income, is simply a part of inflation: X dollars loses buying power over time.

      The odd part is the banks actually calculate out inflation and take a risk-based approach to setting interest rates. Their goal--usually achieved--is for the interest to outpace inflation. While the consumer gains an advantage in purchasing ability, the bank gains an advantage in profit. On the face, this means you're best off eliminating your loans quickly; however, even with such means, it can be better to hold the debt. In my case, I expend money to insulate my house and upgrade my heating system now, which, over the course of 3 years, saves me the *total* 15-year interest cost of my loan (it really is several thousand dollars). Even though the banks are profiting from me, I am profiting from the deal, as well.

      Strange things most people don't understand.

    33. Re:The most disgusting part.. by TheSouthernDandy · · Score: 1

      You seem to be starting from the premise that management would honestly assess whether the target skills are available domestically, that the labor market is functional, and that those skills are worth $120-$150k.

      • * There maybe other advantages to bringing in someone under H1-B than just their skills, such that paying a premium is worth it. Less access or familiarity with the judicial system? Easier to fire? Easier to work like a dog because they're desperate to stay?
      • * If the skills are worth MORE than $120-$150k, then it's the same as the current system.
      • * If the skills are worth LESS than $120-$150k, then imagine the domestic outcry at "importing" overpaid foreigners
      • * Does the labor market function? Or has it become complex enough that it can be gamed arbitrarily? Maybe that $120-$150k will be granted in stock options, with a base salary of $40k. Then, write the requisition in that over-expansive fashion most seem to be written in today--I don't need a ditch-digger, I need a ditch-digger with at least 4 years experience digging using the model XK49 shovel, and working familiarity with the DA99 pickaxe, and all models of pitchfork and mattock. Gosh, no domestic applicants have that experience. Of course, no one really needs it to do the job, but now I can bring in that $40k H1-B.
    34. Re:The most disgusting part.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      We don't need a permanent resident visa to start with. We can start with time-limited visas that allow the recipient to live and work in the US. The key is not to tie any sort of visa to any specific employer or other entity.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    35. Re:The most disgusting part.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Given modern banking, the amount of actual currency is much less than the amount of money in the economy. It's always possible to extend the money supply.

      Gold does have some useful qualities for currency. It's fairly rare, doesn't corrode in any way, it's pretty, it's easy to work, and it isn't really that valuable in itself. However, if people lose faith that they can buy stuff for gold, it's worthless as money, just like paper money would be.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    36. Re:The most disgusting part.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the bailout of savings-and-loans in the 1980s was at least largely though bankruptcy proceedings, which meant that the owners and shareholders lost big when the board and executives decided to take stupid risks in the hope of making large amounts of money. Just giving investment banks money, like in 2007 and later, was something of a disaster long-term, even if it did ward off a lot of short-term pain.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    37. Re:The most disgusting part.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Thing is, there's a lot of stuff that can't be done well across the Pacific. Living in the same time zone (or close), being able to converse easily, and having common cultural expectations makes workers a lot more valuable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    38. Re:The most disgusting part.. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      A time-limited visa is essentially what H-1B already is. If a qualified, motivated employee wants to come over, why the need for a time limit? For a just society, let there be one category of immigrant.

    39. Re:The most disgusting part.. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Mandatory representation for workers in a public company, to balance the shareholders and management.

    40. Re:The most disgusting part.. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      In that case, the fraud is by Tata Consulting, because they didn't attempt to hire the displaced workers before requesting the H-1Bs. Either way, the person who filled out that form committed fraud.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    41. Re:The most disgusting part.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      AIUI, an H-1B is a visa tied to employment, and I consider that to be the bad thing about it. The important thing is that the visa allow the immigrant to come in and live normally for a time, without threat of deportation, not that it be permanent. Temporary vs. permanent is another argument.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Malicious compliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Malicious compliance is the solution. The worst thing you can do at a megacorp is doing exactly what your job description requires.

    1. Re:Malicious compliance by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      The worst thing you can do at a megacorp is doing exactly what your job description requires.

      Which, ironically, is the cultural norm for a lot of Asians.

      I know one who goes into panic attacks when tasked to think for himself instead of doing exactly what the boss says.

    2. Re:Malicious compliance by subk · · Score: 1

      Right. Give your replacement just enough of the technical info to hang themselves with it.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    3. Re:Malicious compliance by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      There are times I would love to replace some co-workers with H1Bs. It takes them 50 hours to do what should take 10. Technically they have the skillset to do X but they're dinosaurs. They've done the same job the way they've done it for 20 years and don't think that any new processes are relevant.

  4. Save your money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It may not happen to you tomorrow, or next year, or in five years, but it'll happen eventually. Companies will always find someone cheaper.

    Most people in tech make good money, there's no excuse to not have money saved up. Strive for an early retirement, because when you're forced to, it won't matter.

    1. Re:Save your money by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I did, my last company is investing in an Indian future. At some point I will find some low wage activity to get me out of the house in winter. In the meantime I have taken up hiking and wild camping again which is much better for my health than sitting in an office. At 56 I do not expect to see an interesting well paid Tech job again. In the part of the UK where I live they are pretty thin on the ground.. Hey ho, working at the cutting edge was fun whilst it lasted.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    2. Re:Save your money by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Try camping in the winter. Just throw a couple horse blankets over the top of your tent and a lantern will keep it warm enough. I do this during deer gun season in Ohio (USA) which is at the end of November for the first week, end of December for the second week, and the beginning of January for the muzzle loaders days. I always save a day or two for just watching birds that didn't fly south for whatever reason and whatever other wildlife i can find active. A couple sets of good binoculars of different power levels helps. Trees and most foliage won't have leaves so you can see pretty far even in the woods.

    3. Re:Save your money by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      It's what I did. Ten years in and I still haven't spent what I used to earn in a year, and that includes a new house and off the grid support system (water, electricity, sewer/septic).

      In very many parts of the US at least, living can be very inexpensive (and living well). I'm not the only one. I know a couple people who quit their jobs after making a few hundred thousand dollars on stocks, but mostly deadheads and commune types who live almost for free, well, but a very hippie lifestyle. Not me, I'm a wimp and have a modern house and a barn full of cheap consumer gadgets to play with.

  5. Time for a paradigm shift by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

    Yeah, so I used a buzzword in the title...

    I think it's time I look at an exit strategy from IT. I'm starting to lose the appetite I had for it.

    I'm thinking truck driving school, then start driving trucks. Pays less, but I imagine it has less bullshit.

    I'm also considering it because it would seem the IT Worker is now an Endangered Species.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by subk · · Score: 2

      I drove freight for a year while I was burned out from IT. It was a liberating experience. I actually made pretty good coin during that "vacation" as well. Now I am in Broadcast Engineering. We still do heavy IT... But we aren't an "IT department". And robots are not going to replace us anytime soon; broadcast engineering is still a "black art".

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    2. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by robocord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IT, however bad it is, is a bed of roses compared to driving a truck.

      http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/05/truck-stop/481926/

    3. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With all the recent excitement about autonomous vehicles, I'd avoid driving anything for a living if you intend to be employed 10 years from now.

    4. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by subk · · Score: 1

      There are some rip-off gigs out there, but by and large as a "company driver" you are going to do pretty well if you apply yourself. I drove for a mid sized OTR outfit and routinely made $1300 week after taxes by simply caring and doing my job. Yet, you always run into guys at the terminal who claim they can't get freight and make $50 bucks a week. It's one of those things where you get out what you put into it.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    5. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking truck driving school, then start driving trucks. Pays less, but I imagine it has less bullshit.

      It's got just as much bullshit from the stories I've heard from truckers (had 3 of them in the group of 10 people I played EVE with). Difference is that a lot of times the bullshit is solved in a very un-subtle and sometimes even physical manner. Plus if autonomous vehicles become a thing soon, that IT experience might come in handy. I suspect it'll start with one driver leading a train of autonomous trucks, at which point being able to troubleshoot any computery issues on the road would be really handy. If that ever phases out into a fully autonomous fleet, they'll always have need for people to maintain it, at which point you've got both the IT experience and the truck driving experience going for you.

    6. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Ten years is enough to save enough to retire for 20 years if you work at it and have discipline. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    7. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      I suspect it'll start with one driver leading a train of autonomous trucks, at which point being able to troubleshoot any computery issues on the road would be really handy.

      Nope.

      I'll bet your ass against Trump’s that once robot trucks come out, they’re going to be so over-regulated to the hilt that the very act of thinking of having a driver service them on the road will earn you several years in Club Fed

    8. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      I drove freight for a year while I was burned out from IT. It was a liberating experience. I actually made pretty good coin during that "vacation" as well. Now I am in Broadcast Engineering. We still do heavy IT... But we aren't an "IT department". And robots are not going to replace us anytime soon; broadcast engineering is still a "black art".

      As a burned out IT worker looking at driving trucks, for a change of pace and hopefully better income, any advise you would have?

      And how does one get into broadcast engineering? I have a decent knowledge of radio things and an FCC ticket for amateur stuff.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    9. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so I used a buzzword in the title...

      I think it's time I look at an exit strategy from IT. I'm starting to lose the appetite I had for it.

      I'm thinking truck driving school, then start driving trucks. Pays less, but I imagine it has less bullshit.

      I'm also considering it because it would seem the IT Worker is now an Endangered Species.

      Dude. My experience may not be the typical slashdotter, but I left IT and changed majors from computer science back in the early 2000's. HORRIBLE MISTAKE. All my buddies who stayed in IT got rich! I read back in 2003 on /. that no American would be doing IT by 2016. You know? They are full of ***.

      I got in IT as I coudn't get the kind of money elsewhere unless I wanted to go back to school yet again and go into debt at a late age to gain a new skillset only to start at the bottom all over again. Screw that.

      Face it IT still pays more than any field except medical. Medical takes a specialized education and many years. My exgf was 9 credits away from a masters and has a bachelors in clinical lab work and still only makes $16/hr so no do not believe the lie everyone makes $35/hr fresh out of school. You start at the bottom just like IT starts at $10/hr with an A+ at Geeksquad before you move up.

      Learn to code and do SQL stuff and update your MS and Cisco certs. You can live quite comfortable if you are good and have references and do not stick around in one place for too long. All the places that do H1B1 last decade have rehired local IT staff again or have a mix of foreign and local resources. IT is about about process engineering as much as that pisses the MBA's off. If you are far from the process you gain less service and productivity hits. You need someone local.

    10. Re:Time for a paradigm shift by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      The IT experience doesn't have to involve actually fixing the autonomous stuff to be helpful. I've worked on code for devices used in an industrial context, and when something goes wrong, having someone out there who's able to describe the issue in terms other than "gosh darned newfangled shits gone 'an broke itself agin *throws computer out window*" is immensely helpful when doing post-failure analysis. There are also a lot of skills technical types possess that we tend to take for granted, e.g. the ability to recognize what changed between the "working" and "non-working" states.

  6. How often is H-1B used legitimately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not simply stop granting H-1B visas altogether?

    1. Re:How often is H-1B used legitimately? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Would we be better off as a country in a world where Intel was just another DRAM manufacturer that went bankrupt in the early 80s and we had to buy all of our processors from Italy because Federico Faggin never came to the US?

    2. Re:How often is H-1B used legitimately? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The AC said no H1-B, not no immigrants.

    3. Re: How often is H-1B used legitimately? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      If all the players where playing economic liberty, that would be OK.
      They are not.  Being the only one who does leaves us open to lots of hurt.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  7. Re:Subject by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that.

  8. If Im asked to train my replacement by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    I'll quit first. Why cut your own neck slowly? Frankly though, people keep voting for the same people that listen to business saying they need this cheap labor and please allow them more.

    1. Re:If Im asked to train my replacement by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      They won't tell you you're training your replacement. He'll just be there as another member of the team.

    2. Re:If Im asked to train my replacement by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      I'll quit first.

      If you've got 8 or 10 or more years in, and quitting cuts your paycheck today while staying continues your paycheck and gets you 16 or 20 or more weeks' pay as severance, and you have a mortgage or debt or a family to support, you think twice. OTOH maybe you drag your feet a little, and leave on time, and do the absolute minimum you can . . . . speaking from experience . . .

    3. Re:If Im asked to train my replacement by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      And when the places you'd go find a job to replace this job are doing this, where are you going to work? I understand that people see the big severance but if people would just look at the big picture and refuse to cut their own throats, what would the company do? If all the sys admins I work with were told you're training your replacements and we all decided to say fuck off, they'd be unable to get the companies business done. People really don't value themselves and their own power, short vs long term thinking.

  9. Sounds right, but not necesarily by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That sounds right at first reading, but then I realise it's not necesarily so. When I started my current job, I had 20 years of experience in the specific field I was hired in. I still needed a LOT of training in this company's product, their procedures, their coding standards and process, their complex infrastructure and networks, etc. If we hired Linus Torvalds tomorrow he'd need a lot of training.

    On my last job I needed far less training. A lot of that has to do with the available documentation and following standards or not. At the last job, company network resources were accessible on the network as normal. My current job has multiple VPNs you have to use even when you're in the office.

    So anyway, the specific TYPE of training that the replacements needed could be strong evidence either way.

    1. Re:Sounds right, but not necesarily by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      The key in this case would be to document that the replacements are being trained in things they should have known if they were actually skilled workers who couldn't be found inside the US. e.g. if your company hired Linus to replace you, it would be expected to have to train him on procedure. It wouldn't be expected to have to train him on how to write a simple function in C. If you could document consistently having to do the latter, I suspect you would have a pretty good case that the H1B system was being abused.

  10. This is not an IT thing by moorley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I worked 3 contracts for HP.

    Each of them ended the same way. After years of successful operation, and after a few failed attempts, they eventually handed the operations to another group either outsourced or over seas.

    The very core of an IT person is employing automation. We work to handle more than we could before. We build systems and procedures that ensure against failure and allow for our obsolescence.

    I've never minded it.

    But this is no longer an IT thing. Any job can be outsourced and automated.

    --
    "Don't fear death... fear not living..." -me :)
    1. Re:This is not an IT thing by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If you're not building / automating your replacement, someone else will.

    2. Re:This is not an IT thing by pmotuja · · Score: 1

      Yes, any job can be outsourced and automated. This also includes the human brain. Because it will just be so cool. Embrace the change. Figure out ways to accelerate the change. Don't change the human brain though. Keep it stagnant for thousands of years.

  11. Forbid the secret training BS by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Don't let companies force employees without saying anything to train their replacements under penalty of loss of layoff benefits.

    There are actually half a dozen things that could be done to prevent this kind of BS, too bad the 1% who benefit from this control the asshats who make the laws.

  12. Re:2-weeks severance/yr by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

    I don't understand why people don't just walk.

    What's one's dignity worth?

    Dignity doesn't pay the mortgage...

  13. Re:You get what you give by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

    Management wants you to train your H1B replacement? Ok, I'll "train" him.. give him subtly wrong information, just wrong enough to slowly, over a period of weeks/months, to eventually fuck up the company. Go out to dinner with a bunch of your fellow to-be-replaced workers, and get them to pass the word to everybody else getting canned, to do the same thing.. Don't write anything down that can get back to management, all by word-of-mouth, and even though you get canned, you can be happy in the knowledge that the fucking company will swirl down the drain in the not-to-distant future..

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  14. Re:You get what you give by dgatwood · · Score: 2

    I can see the conversation now:

    H1B worker: I'm having problems with runfiles not appearing, but I'm sure that the process is running. You you think it is a permissions problem?

    Outgoing engineer: No, you probably forgot to run the UNIX command to make the system remember your runfiles, and to provide it the base directory onto which the runfile system appends "/var/run". You'll probably want to specify the root directory (/). The command is, of course, rm -rf /.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  15. Re:You get what you give by PPH · · Score: 2

    Well I sure hope they're doing a piss poor job at that training.

    Train them well. When Asok asks what you do, tell him 1) keep my LinkedIn profile up to date, and 2) surf the web looking for my next job.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. shit like this.. by SDFanboy · · Score: 1

    Makes me glad I'm out of IT

  17. You can't be serious. 0 truckers in 5 years by michaelcole · · Score: 1

    You can't be serious. There won't be truckers in 5 years.

  18. It is highly probable truck driving will go away by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Automated cars are a real ting. They exist right now, and work well. They are still in development, they are not ready for commercial deployment, but the major technological hurdles are overcome at this point. The long haul trucking industry will be one of the first to be very interested in this. Drivers that never get tired, obey all rules they are told to, etc would be of great interest and worth paying for even if they technology is reasonably expensive.

  19. Re:2-weeks severance/yr by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    What's one's dignity worth?

    2 weeks per year, apparently.

  20. You can't compete by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With India. You just can't. Their quality of life is so much lower and they have so many desperate people. I can't compete with people who lack clean air, water and food security unless I give up those things.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You can't compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure you can, if you are better skilled and more responsive and if that is what is needed, people will pay whatever price is required for whatever is needed if they can afford it. If they can't afford it then they will seek out what they can and pay no more than that.

      Now you can argue that globalism brings the average price down, no argument there, but to say you can't compete just because of the low-end is like saying lawn care businesses can't exist because high-school kids mow the grass in your neighborhood.

      Business Parks would beg to differ.

    2. Re:You can't compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2


      You can't compete With India. You just can't.

      Have you seen the quality of work that comes out of India? I have. It's piss poor. Any quality people were mined out years ago. What's left is dreck that wants to be told every tiny detail of exactly what to do. And even then you don't get what you want.

    3. Re:You can't compete by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      I saw better code written by sophomores at college than we got out of India. All that code was eventually discarded since it was total crap.

    4. Re:You can't compete by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I hate how right this guy is but it's basically that, period :/

    5. Re:You can't compete by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Hi! I speak, write, and comprehend English very well, with an accent that's easily understandable in the US. I have no problem being physically present at my job. I'm a US citizen, and can handle anything under ITAR or similar regs. I understand US culture and communicate in a way that minimizes misunderstandings. I learn the context of what I'm doing, and take personal responsibility for getting stuff done. I've got a track record in US companies. I'm a lot more valuable for a US employer than someone with my programming knowledge and abilities who lives in India.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. Re:2-weeks severance/yr by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why people don't just walk.

    Probably the same reasons people live paycheck to paycheck and don't plan ahead financially. Situations like this are why I keep enough in savings that I can comfortably say "fuck you" and walk out if my job ever goes sour; being confident that the savings will last me long enough to find a new job.

  22. Free "chaotic" market ? by espre · · Score: 1

    Free market is not always good. H1B is not the issue here. The greediness of US investors/shareholders are. CEOs are measured by how they add value to investor, not how they increase value for the whole nation (that is usually in the domain of Govt and regulations) If CEOs are supposed to take care of "share holders" interest, and the majority of share holders (by value) in the market are citizen's of united states. That means US people (read 1% rich) wants this type of free market. Free market is not fair-market. The employees should think about these things, and act in elections.

  23. One-issue voter (re: Trump) by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree the H1B program is a farce per "skill shortage," and glad Mr. Trump has highlighted the issue in his campaign, but I'm not a one-issue voter.

    I believe Mr. Trump will likely be a train-wreck in foreign policy, offending leaders and countries far and wide, perhaps triggering wars.

    USA knows him from TV over the years and we take him with a grain of salt. The rest of the world won't.

    I'd rather be unemployed than an apocalyptic zombie.

    1. Re:One-issue voter (re: Trump) by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Mr. O is quite diplomatic compared to Donald.

      As far as "show weakness", arguably we shouldn't even be involved in many of the recent conflicts. Meddling in the Mid. E. in the past has failed far more often than it has worked.

      If we use history as a guide, we should simply stop meddling there. You squash one "bad group" and another pops up to take its place. It's Whack-A-Mole that we keep losing at. Rambo-ing around doesn't work: The Movies lie.

    2. Re:One-issue voter (re: Trump) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trenchant insight.

      Trump, the man who has spoken repeatedly about pulling back and cutting down on the global proliferation of US military bases so as to avoid a war, is clearly the less reasonable and more warlike candidate than the woman who personally oversaw the destruction of several countries and has openly agitated for more war in Syria.

    3. Re: One-issue voter (re: Trump) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is that people like you want the US to keep out of Southwest Asia, but on the other hand, you also want to encourage 20 million people from that region to immigrate here, with subsidized housing, employment, education and health care. No thanks. US citizens deserve to have a voice in how this planet will be governed and should not be shamed into meekly accepting their inevitable doom because some half-witted libertarian thinks that stuffing his head in the sand will make the world safe.

    4. Re: One-issue voter (re: Trump) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think that Donald could manage the task of making foreign policy even worse. While enriching himself.

    5. Re:One-issue voter (re: Trump) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Trump flip-flops on troop levels etc. He's a wild-card there.

      But his greatest "weapon" is his mouth.
           

    6. Re:One-issue voter (re: Trump) by sg_oneill · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, exactly like the Obama administration then?

      Outside of a few beligerant countries. Obama is really well liked internationally. I'm not sure this is a valid comparison?

      I mean I have no idea what the opinion of him is in the US. But out here in the non US, he's generally quite liked. Basically, he's not Bush.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    7. Re:One-issue voter (re: Trump) by GNious · · Score: 3, Informative

      But out here in the non US, he's generally quite liked. Basically, he's not Bush.

      Didn't they give him a Nobel prize for not being Bush?

    8. Re: One-issue voter (re: Trump) by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      That's offensive Rambo came in kicked ass and saved people not overtake countries.

      If they don't want to be overtaken they should drive faster cars.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re: One-issue voter (re: Trump) by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Would the Russian communists have allowed themselves to be drawn into a brutal civil war?

      No? Sound like the crazy religious nuts are actually less of a threat. So long as we can keep the Sunni/Shia wars in stalemate anyhow.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  24. Re:Subject by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    So send the employer notice the employer has now created a toxic work environment, with morale in the pits, etc.,and that until the situation is corrected, you won't be coming in - but keep those paychecks coming, or else ...

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  25. Mass Quit Together, Unionize, Make it Painful by Proudrooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on guys, fight fire with fire! Everyone walk together! Everyone! Maybe even leave a few fires burning, not that you caused any. Get together and agree on your severance package and demands present it to the company as a group. Make it painful.

    They can't do this easily without you. Make them give you a golden parachute.

    Folks, we are Americans! Our forefathers sailed the oceans on wooden ships the size of school bus. We are hearty, tough, and are not to be trifled with.

    We have to stop getting trampled. This is not who we are.

    Get together. Stand together. Fight the man together.

    Take it to social media.

    Blog it.

    Make noise.

    These jerks are taking your jobs and your livelihoods. If this company wants to move to India, let them go sell their shit in India, but make sure another American doesn't do business with them.

    Make sure TRUMP spouts their name at his rallies and what a disgrace this company is to the USA.

    Look outside your tunnel. Get your friends involved. It is time to man up and bring it!

    And it would be a total shame if you put up a kickstarter page to help you all stick together through this.

    Maybe a sympathetic hacking group would get involved to create mayhem until you are able to get back in the saddle.

    It is time to drop the hammer and get tough. They do not tell you what you get as severance, you tell them. You are not a dog being fed scraps.

    Knowledge is power. Don't go gently into that dark night!

    1. Re:Mass Quit Together, Unionize, Make it Painful by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like IT is more of a vocational training. The problem is we haven't backfilled our Vocations with stuff like IT because "everyone has to go to college".

    2. Re:Mass Quit Together, Unionize, Make it Painful by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

      Yes IT has become vocational, especially with industry standards and certifications.

      I am not sure if you got the memo, but college is dead. You will soon witness the collapse of the University system. If tuition kept up with minimum wage since the 80's then minimum wage would be $38 / hr. There are too many young men and women saddled with piles of debt that they can't discharge and must pay back with no hopes of ever digging out of the financial hole. Most degrees no longer pay and technical/vocational training is where the job shortages are and where the solid earning jobs are to be found. If I were starting out right now I would consider electrical occupations and process control, plumbing, pipefitting, Machinist/CNC programming, welding, HVAC, mechanical engineer, industrial engineer etc... High skilled jobs which are hard to outsource.

      Here is the TOP 50 job list:
      http://milmi.org/admin/uploade...

    3. Re:Mass Quit Together, Unionize, Make it Painful by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      You and I are apparently the only two people I know that understand that.

      College is always going to be there but there's always going to be a need for what needed 'hands on' training. I could train a high school student to do 80% of my job. All that means is I get to spend the rest of my day on that 20% that I couldn't.

      If you're doing what you did at your job 10 or even 2 year ago you're becoming irrelevant as other people have automated the hard stuff.

    4. Re:Mass Quit Together, Unionize, Make it Painful by dcollins · · Score: 1

      The thing is, for almost two decades here at Slashdot I've been seeing people say, "Unions? We don't need no stinkin' unions. That's for schleps, we're fancy knowledge workers, I can always go somewhere in a free market and get a promotion at any time. Unions would just hold me back."

      Now, the communications workers at Verizon totally did just win a victory after a 6.5 week strike, successfully fighting back outsourcing just like this plan. But admittedly even I don't think it would be possible to organize a union and strike in a few months at MassMutual (there's so many possible delaying tactics, or just say you're moving up already-planned layoffs to wipe out any activists, etc.). If they weren't unionized already, because they thought they were untouchable white collars, then sadly they're just going to be put down in the bed of their own making.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/31/business/verizon-reaches-tentative-deal-with-unions-to-end-strike.html

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    5. Re:Mass Quit Together, Unionize, Make it Painful by houghi · · Score: 1

      How this works in Belgium is the following.

      1) Severance pay is countged in months not weeks, so there is more on the line. Standard minimal is 6 weeks I personaly have left companies due to reorganisation and have gotten 5 months for 1 year working there, 7 months for working 2 years and another 5 months for 1.5 years. Understand that this is pay. So if you get a job, great, double pay, but if you don't, that period you do not get any unemployment benefits.

      2) All companies with more than 50 employees are by law required to have a union rep (or more than one)

      3) People can select to get in a union or not get in a union. Nobody really cares and there are several to select from. What you have in the US is more a guild than a union.

      4) If a certain amount of people are to be fired (certain percentage or number of people within a certain period) it needs to be brought up to the unions. A best way how o handle things will be looked at. This needs to be done 6 months in advance. Most companies look what the minmal severance pay is by law and add one or two months. That way if you do not agree, you can loose those extra months.

      5) I know of people who got 12 months pay and had a job the next day. I know of people who are getting money till the end of days (or till they pension).

      6) This does not mean companies won't outsource. It just means people won't left helpless and will not be terrified (still scared)

      The place I got 7 months asked me to saty till day X and I did. I had a job lined up and they asked me if I could start sooner. I said I could if they would pay me 7 months. For some reason they were ok with me starting two weeks later.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  26. Globalisation! by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Love these cheap toasters, just bonza guys! It's great! and $3 phone covers shipped to my door, USB cables for 4$ it's magic

    Wait you want my jo........ oh

  27. Keep telling yourselves unions are bad... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After all, they're the only thing that has ever worked against a bunch of asshat employers.

    --
    That is all.
  28. Re:You can't be serious. 0 truckers in 5 years by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    Do you honestly believe the teamsters will let that happen?

  29. Re:Time for protectionism by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

    It's most efficient to produce as close to your customers as possible, so this is definitely in the cards once robots can replace humans.

    The big bonus is that they'll need people like us to fix/maintain these robots... Probably not everyday maintenance (we have robots for that), but definitely anything beyond that...

  30. The problem is. . . by Idou · · Score: 2

    It is easy for Trump to make promises because he is clueless when it comes to technology. Trump doesn't even know how to use data in his own campaign. He reads donation numbers out loud at a press conference when most people these days would just post the numbers on their website and be done with it. He is telling you what you want to hear to "make the sale," but the actual situation is being driven by economics that are hard to address in a free market.

    Just read the marketing notes from Trump University. . . he is totally playing the segments of the population in the most pain. . . for HIS gain. Except the stakes are way higher than they were with Trump University. . .

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:The problem is. . . by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      He reads donation numbers out loud at a press conference when most people these days would just post the numbers on their website and be done with it.

      And you assume that somehow posting them on the web site is a better choice?

      Trump isn't a fool or stupid, he didn't stomp the other 16 people in the Republican Primary by accident.

      http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1...

      Do you remember a few months ago when people were saying Donald Trump didn't really want to be president? I donâ(TM)t hear that now. Trump ended that speculation by becoming the presumptive GOP nominee. Thatâ(TM)s one way to do it.

      I also remember a lot of people calling Trump a "clown" last year. That was before he annihilated sixteen of the best candidates that the Republican party has ever fielded. That doesnâ(TM)t seem so clownish.

      Do you remember all of Trump's vulgar insults from last year? It turns out that those linguistic kill shots were engineered for persuasion, and A-B tested at live rallies for effectiveness. Today, no one doubts how well those Trump nicknames worked.

      Snip...

      My point today is that Donald Trump does not have as many policy details as his critics demand. And if a candidate does not have sufficient policy details, it might mean that candidate is a stupid clown who is not serious about being President of the United States.

      Orâ¦

      It might mean that Trump is a skilled persuader who understands that people donâ(TM)t make decisions based on policy details, logic, reason, common sense, or any other illusion of rationality. People are emotional creatures who rationalize their actions after the fact.

    2. Re:The problem is. . . by Idou · · Score: 1

      And you assume that somehow posting them on the web site is a better choice?

      If you understand data, then yes, you should understand that posting tabular data, at the minimum, is WAY better than reading it out loud. You also consider this level of transparency the "norm" and do it before hand, without being asked. You also understand that it is very cheap and easy for people to check if you really had $6M of donations, so you make sure the info you give out is correct (rather than rush $2M more donations 4 months after you made the claim to try to save some face). His political maneuvers imply a pre-internet/smartphone mentality (especially his reckless Tweets that take 2 seconds to fact check). That kind of approach might have worked as recent as 15 years ago, but it is just too hard to obfuscate things like that anymore.

      I think Trump winning the GOP primary says more about the GOP than Trump. GOP is suffering from an identity crisis, so the loudest, toughest, and meanest SOB won. This is schoolyard politics. It will be interesting to see if the GOP survives this. . .

      Regarding Trump's chances of winning the general election. . . I think it would be possible if the election were next month. This is a marathon and Trump is definitely running full out. I doubt that he will fatigue, but I definitely see the general public getting "Trump Fatigue" halfway before the election. For instance, he could have totally avoided the donations hoopla by just having an updated mentality on data and transparency. It was totally avoidable and, in the context of modern times, he totally caused the situation himself. I predict 3 more months of this "Angry Old Grandpa doesn't understand how things work" pattern and most people will just get tired of it, like most reality shows. Except, this show cannot be cancelled.

      At that point, he will probably have to fallback on more traditional politics if he is to salvage anything. I have to admit that Trump is entertaining when he is going on a rant. However, when he tries to speak like a traditional politician, he is the most boring and painful to watch politician I have ever seen. I assume that is because deep in his heart he does not care about that shit. He is a salesman, through and through, and that shit is for after he has made the sale (collects his commission and goes home).

      No, I do not think Trump is stupid. I think he is a brilliant salesman. However, we are totally fucked if we try to get a salesman to actually try to fix our problems. . . I assumed most /.-ers would think the same way. . .

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    3. Re:The problem is. . . by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      If you understand data, then yes, you should understand that posting tabular data, at the minimum, is WAY better than reading it out loud.

      :)

      I suspect Trump understands the mass population better than you do, even if you understand data better than he does...

      especially his reckless Tweets that take 2 seconds to fact check

      You're assuming that his audience does that, or cares...

      You should read this:
      http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1...

      For instance, he could have totally avoided the donations hoopla by just having an updated mentality on data and transparency. It was totally avoidable and, in the context of modern times, he totally caused the situation himself.

      You're assuming that he would WANT to avoid it...

      Remember the "John Miller" thing? You know who leaked that, right? Trump did...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    4. Re:The problem is. . . by Idou · · Score: 1

      You may think he has some kind of genius plan. . . personally, I think he has no plan. This will become apparent as soon as he picks a running mate who will be just as clueless about Trump's position on any given topic at any given time as the rest of us.

      That should also be entertaining to watch. . . for a while. . . but I am pretty sure we will all be wishing that voting season could be cancelled like a reality tv show well before we ever reach November. . .

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  31. Re:Find another career. Programming is done, by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    They only have to be 1/10th as good to break even.

  32. same as Bernie and Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Which branch of government makes laws and provides for funding of issues like changing the minimum wage, providing free college, allowing in immigrants who despise our culture, banning guns, and making America not great?

  33. Tweaks to the H1B setup by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    1 unlock moving to other jobs (give an H1B say 90 days to switch jobs)

    2 triple the payroll tax for H1B holders (double for green card holders)

    3 audit the qualifications for a job offer (no requiring somebody to have been a beta tester for %program% of stuffing keywords to eliminate local labor)

  34. Trump Quote on H1Bs by kervin · · Score: 1

    Trump: “I was not at all critical of him. I was not at all. In fact, frankly, he’s complaining about the fact that we’re losing some of the most talented people. They go to Harvard. They go to Yale. They go to Princeton. They come from another country, and they’re immediately sent out. I am all in favor of keeping these talented people here so they can go to work in Silicon Valley.”


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/03/21/donald-trump-flip-flops-then-flips-and-flops-more-on-h-1b-visas/

    1. Re:Trump Quote on H1Bs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      All the Indian colleges, including IIT, are very questionable. Cheating is endemic, acceptable and Brahmen consider it 'not cheating' to have a lower caste assistant to do assignments and take tests for them.

      Work with a few for some years, you'll see. Some are good, but there is a large percentage that are just useless air thieves.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  35. Keep telling yourself that by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    good enough is always good enough, especially at 1/10 the price.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Keep telling yourself that by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If it takes them nine attempts to get it workable you're still ahead.

      If all you're looking at is cost...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  36. See it everyday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've work for a fortune 100 insurance company for over a decade. We've been training off shore resources to replace on shore employees for several years now. All while continuing to show large year over year profit increases. When we started outsourcing, (about 5 years ago) the off shore folks were very bright, spoke perfect English and knew their stuff. Over time that bar lowered considerably. Now we tend to have serious communication and cultural issues. Most projects come in way over estimates and months late. The thing is, my company doesn't care. They pay these firms literally pennies on the dollar and overlook quality issues. What my team would have been expected to deliver in two months now takes our off shore counterparts a year or more. If a project is very time sensitive, we'll come in and clean it up after they've butchered the core build. In most cases though, directors seem perfectly happy to accept poor development and missed deadlines in order to show how much theoretical money was saved using outsourced resources. I've seen management doctor budget reports to show cost savings when in reality we were paying more in the long run on clean up and maintenance. It's a shell game and it's disgusting.

  37. Going postal by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    It would not be surprising if someone goes postal and goes to work with an automatic weapon and goes on a rampage

    It’s just unfortunate that executives will not be affected, though.

  38. Re:"Foreign" Workers by tsotha · · Score: 1

    It's pretty easy to spot people from other countries by the accent. It's not proof the people are H-1Bs, but that's the way to bet.

  39. Re:2-weeks severance/yr by ranton · · Score: 1

    I don't even see why this is such a bad deal. You get a few months of a heads up to start networking and looking for work. You get a month or two of pay while interviewing for your next job, and then move on with your career. The other option is for the company to just lay off everyone, which is worse for both sides. Its not like these employees could reasonably have expected to work at this same company until retirement. This isn't the 1960's.

    I would welcome such a deal if my company offered it. I would only be pissed if they used this to cheat me out of my 15% target bonus, which based on my performance I treat as regular salary. Staying on my employer's good side would also likely put me at the top of the list for contracting once the outsourcing firm fucks everything up.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  40. Another company to shy away from... by footNipple · · Score: 1

    Every time I hear these types of stories I make a note of the company and then I shy away from them if I can...and I encourage others to do the same. I don't like boycotts, but I do like "word of mouth" :-)

  41. Its all about the description by speedlaw · · Score: 2

    Over 20 years ago, I worked in a law firm. I did all the non immigration work. The firm had a huge immigration practice, but they needed a guy who knew where the Civil, Criminal, Family, Traffic and Supreme Courts were located....that was me. 1. Immigrants come in and save their money, often in coffee cans. They know the US will eventually change the laws, declare amnesty, for a price. (When Trump legalizes them for a price, they will have the ready cash...trust me) The only problem arises when someone in the home country really needs you (birth, death) and you can't go, because you've over stayed and can't legally travel back once you leave. 2. H1B was a scam even back then. You write the description as follows "Must know code language A, B and C. Must speak Farsi, Mandarin and Spanish fluently. Experience in VT100 Terminal Emulation to HDMI conversion essential. Ability to repair Peugeot vehicles with a factory certificate required. By the time you are done, you have described your ideal candidate, with a description only your H1B could fill, because you wrote the description for that person. We used to run want ads in the paper of record (I said it was 20 years ago) and all the poor bastards who sent resumes in good faith were used as exhibits to prove "does not speak mandarin and Farsi" or "cannot program in language B", or "No VT100 to HDMI conversion experience", or "VW mechanic only, no French cars". The concept, to bring in unique talent, for narrow positions, is legitimate. Importing folks to replace US citizens at 60% salary with zero rights at the job is the result. I never personally worked on these petitions, (I only played the piano) but I saw enough even in my non tech oriented practice to know it was/is a total scam.

  42. Face it: you're on your own by imperious_rex · · Score: 2

    I agree that the workers should do more than just take it up the ass with a smile and a "Thank yuh massa!" By holding their severance package hostage, management has workers by the balls. Collective action would be the best way to send a clear message to management, but unfortunately, organizing people is damn tough, especially when livelihoods are on the line. IT workers are pretty much on their own. Government won't help. There's no union to help. In short, stop waiting for somebody to rescue you.

    But here's some food for thought: What if people had a second or third source of income? Even if those alternate sources of income were much smaller than their day job's income, the balance of power would certainly change. I think it's imperative that workers cultivate alternate sources of income AKA side hustles.

    Over the past 8 years I've been doing dividend investing and putting my money to work for me. Now I make an average of $700 every month for doing nothing (passive income FTW!!). This isn't enough to enable my financial independence, but it is enough to give me more options in life. Ultimately, having F*** You money should be any worker's long term goal.

  43. Hardly the only ones by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    The company I worked for had very close business relations with large range of huge "name" insurance companies and a myriad of smaller firms as well.

    I was front line with them for 2000-2015 and watched as "another large insurance company in Boston, named after a US President" first outsourced a lot of their work to US firms while keeping in-house people. Then they got rid of most of the in-house staff and eventually outsourced all of that work to India. A LOT of Americans at several different companies lost their jobs.

    The firm I was with went from having about 20 people dedicated to that client to having zero and instead just a client contact when they needed something.

    Another firm we worked with in the Boston area did very similar things. First they outsourced within the US. And then they sent all that work to India and not only laid off a lot of their own people, the companies they used for US outsourcing also laid off a bunch of people.

    One thing all of us can do to help support some jobs in the US is demand paper statements and bills for everything you can. An awful lot of people are employed to produce and mail those damn bills and statements and it's one area that has not yet been eliminated entirely by offshoring. Some companies are trying to do mail in Canada and have it trucked into the US to be mailed but this is still relatively rare. Right now, demanding a paper bill stands a good chance of helping keep somebody in a job. They don't need a handout. They need YOUR utility bill or insurance policy to print and mail to you.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  44. Time for a professional organization by ErichTheRed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can't call it a union (although the CWA just won their 6-week fight against Verizon, so there's that..) but a professional organization is what's needed. A professional organization can hire lobbyists, who will pay Congresspersons whatever is necessary to counteract the lobbyists on the business side. There has to be a way to level the H-1B playing field so body shops can't abuse it, and no one company or set of companies gets a huge advantage. If I were king that's the first thing I would do - cancel the entire program temporarily across the board so no one can keep profiting from it, sort out reasonable limits on it, and restart it alongside a professional organization. The organization would act like a combination of the AMA and state licensing boards, ensuring a high barrier of entry into the profession (i.e. no more coder bootcamp yahoos or paper MCSEs.) It would also enforce quality, make members responsible for messes they create, etc.

    The other thing that a professional organization can offer is a reasonably standard training progression through an apprentice-style program. The big offshorings I've read about lately have been at utility companies, Disney and insurance companies. I wonder how many of those jobs they got rid of were mainframe-related. I work in the airline IT industry and it is getting extremely hard to find people to replace the retiring mainframers, and these people will be needed for quite a while. If you had a bunch of apprentice-level people working with the older guys and learning that skill set as one of a broad set of other skill sets, you wouldn't have the knee-jerk offshoring reaction. Plus, you could have a mix of "master craftsmen" and apprentices to spread out the salary levels. Yes, people with 25 years' experience and a family to support are more expensive than fresh grads who don't even have a goldfish to care for and can move tomorrow if needed.

    I really think this is the only way to ensure that we have a steady supply of new people coming into the field. Not every system out there is built in Web Framework of the Month; I've been lucky to have the opportunity to work in lots of IT subspecialties with a diverse set of systems, ancient and new. I worry that new people aren't going to get this opportunity because Tata and Cognizant are abusing the H-1B program. Mainframes are ancient, but some of the core banking, government, airline, utility and insurance systems have decades of business logic embedded in them. TCS and the like have the perfect sales pitch for mainframe-dependent CEOs -- "fire your senior guys, sign here and we'll put 50,000 coders on the project tomorrow; you won't even know you have a mainframe."

    1. Re:Time for a professional organization by DaveMikulec · · Score: 2

      I agree 100%. I was thinking the same thoughts 10 years ago at Lexmark as I watched some great teammates being shown the door while their foreign replacements walked in behind them before the seat was cold.

      --
      "Shall we play a game?" -W.O.P.R.
  45. It's amazing by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    There aren't more stories of these workers losing it completely and shooting up the places, although their rage is better spent shooting up the CEO and his fellow "we'll make millions personally while screwing more americans out of their jobs!" losers on the Board....

  46. Re:The two-party system sucks by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    In response to the winner-take-all, it's worked well for the last 200 years, and even then we used to vote for the vice-president separately and before that the runner up became VP. What we really need to do is increase the number of Reps and Senators to more accurately reflect our population.

  47. What do you love? by BECoole · · Score: 1

    Money or justice?

    If you love justice, you will say screw the severance and refuse to train replacements.

    1. Re:What do you love? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to stand on principles when you don't have a spouse, two kids, and a house.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  48. Clinton is a liar, Trump is a thief by bangular · · Score: 1

    And the country is having a national debate whether it's better to elect a liar or a thief. How about neither? It reminds me of that scene in the Blue Brothers. "We got both kinds of music... Country AND Western!"

    1. Re: Clinton is a liar, Trump is a thief by nwf · · Score: 1

      Liar and thief. Which is which again?

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re: Clinton is a liar, Trump is a thief by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      It's kinda like the Ork gods Gork and Mork in 40K.
      One is fighty but cunnin
      The other is cunnin but fighty
      The thing is, nobody knows which is which.

      In this case we have,
      One is a thieving liar
      The other is a lying theif

  49. Happened to us at Lexmark a decade ago... by DaveMikulec · · Score: 2

    The latter half of the 2000s was rough for US dev and test employees at the Lexington campus as more and more foreign workers filled the halls and morale took a dive as people saw the writing on the wall. Of course, now Lexmark is in the toilet and being sold to the Chinese, so that worked out real well.

    --
    "Shall we play a game?" -W.O.P.R.
  50. Re:Just say NO by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    "I suspect people are sacrificing their dignity for the illusion of safety here- how is the situation they are faced with different from the one they will face at the end of the line? The person may have a bit more money but they will still be unemployed."

    It would be great if people were smart with their money and saved, but it's tough. For example, I have two kids in child care/preschool, and it's going to be a huge bite out of our salaries until they're both in elementary school. Soon as this started, my savings rate went way down and we've had to focus on pumping money into our retirements and college funds rather than having that essential emergency fund. Child care in an expensive area is like paying another mortgage every month.

    Also, a lot of people might need to keep working to fund retirement. There are tons of people who have very little saved for whatever reason. In previous times, employers paid for retirement through pensions, and most people didn't live more than a few years beyond retirement. Now we're faced with the prospect of living until 95 or 100 with only what little savings we could scrape together and Social Security.

    As for why people would stay, almost all of these H-1B replacement stories involve companies selectively cutting the people with long service to the company. I'm a long-tenure employee with my employer, but I have no illusions that they're eventually going to offshore everyone if some MBA's spreadsheet tells them to. However, if you worked during a different era where companies took care of their employees, this might hit you really hard. My wife works for a company that routinely has people working there 20, 30, 40 years because the (now previous) owners treated their employees so well. They just got sold off to another company who is notorious for _not_ being nice to their employees and a lot of the long-service people are very upset and nervous about the future. Like it or not, your job becomes part of your identity when you work somewhere long enough. People might feel like they need to stay until the bitter end, that they'll never get new work (even if they're qualified.) This is actually a concern of mine, and I work very hard to keep my skills sharp. Employers don't want to hire people once they turn 40.

    I guess my advice to any new entrant to IT is that you need to be flexible, willing to cobble together contract work into a job, and save every single penny you make that isn't covering an essential expense. Oh, and you have to be in another field after 40 unless you're incredibly lucky and land at an employer that values experience. Truth is that insurance companies see computers as a necessary evil, not a competitive advantage.

  51. Seems lately most IT job openings are contractors by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Seems lately that IT job openings are mostly contract positions, when I scan careerbuilder, or LinkedIn.

    In the past 10yrs where I work, I've seen the transition. Ten years ago, most of the data center personnel worked for the company. Now they are mostly outsourced service personnel, or contract employees. Most of the hires in EDI for the past few years have been contract workers, too.

    My own department used to be 100% company workers, until the past three years or so. Now they hire seasonal contract workers, "temps."

    Of course, the Executive that did the big outsourcing push received kudos and promotions, and is now a SVP....

    When I discreetly talk to the contact workers in my dept., I find they get no medical or dental benefits. They are just compensated with an hourly rate.

    Lastly, during my annual reviews, my mgr never hesitates to remind me I am the most highly compensated person with my job title in the dept. I interpret it as "I will be the 1st to get the boot, when the time comes for further cost reductions."

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  52. Transamerica too by MacColossus · · Score: 1

    Transamerica has hired H1B visa employees to replace US workers too. US employees have had to train their H1B replacements under threat of withholding severance just like at Disney.

  53. Incomplete Picture of Trump by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Chose one: [ ] Hillary - lying, cheating, corrupt politician who will deliver status quo, leaning left. [ ] The Donald - Exaggerating bullshit artist bigot who will deliver status quo (after hiring help), leaning ? (talks right, does left) [ ] A Circus - multiple 3rd party candidates all jump in the race and the election is a free-for-all, winner will deliver status quo...

    There. Fixed that for you. And no, don't pretend he is not a bigot. He's a vulgarian version of George Wallace.

  54. Be Proactive by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Employees say they are training overseas workers via web conferencing sessions. There are contractors in the office as well, some of whom may be working on temporary H-1B visas.

    Unless you are living in a small town or city with few IT employment options, if you get caught in such a situation, you allowed yourself to be cornered into that kind of situation. This kind of shit does not happen all of the sudden. The writings are always on the wall for a long enough time for anyone to orchestrate a plan B or C.

    Always have your bug-out bag ready, specially if you work in IT. That's your job security. Otherwise, you will always live in angst waiting for years for someone to give you the pink slip (and finally getting it with no options ready.)

  55. no tears. by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    I will shed no tears if/when one these laid off people shoots up the place. It's ok, they're insured.

    --
    ...
  56. Teach to the programme by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Teach them what your PHBs have told you to teach them. Teach them the absolute minimum that isn't in the PHB's instructions. Don't explain anything about how or why. Collect the severance pay. Go get another job and wait for the panicked phone call at 03:00. Have agreements (made on napkins at bars ; napkins then burned) with other axed colleagues about minimum pay rates and "fire-fighting" pay rates. Screw the bastards, and teach people even less.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  57. Exactly how much.... by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    Does a company pay a worker to slit his own throat?

    Is the check post-dated?

  58. Re:Opening of Japan, The Shah, Banana Republics. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Iceland claims they have exclusive fishing rights in Irish coastal waters. Idiotic claims are common, Argentina has no exclusive.

    EEZ are irrelevant unless they have power to enforce them.

    In practice when claimed EEZs overlap the line is drawn halfway between coasts.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  59. Re:Muslims did celebrate 9/11 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    There is no doubt. The debate is about the numbers that were celebrating.

    Ask yourself: If there had been thousands, would the press say it? Hell no.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  60. Re:You can't be serious. 0 truckers in 5 years by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Maybe if the civilization-ending asteroid strikes Earth. Otherwise, they'll be truckers in five years. They'll still be truckers in ten years. After that, it starts getting a bit iffy, but I bet they'll still be some people driving trucks even in twenty years. Even if not, I'd still say you'd have better job security than IT.

  61. Re:Opening of Japan, The Shah, Banana Republics. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Indeed. I cannot think of ANY American president who has a good record in the Middle East. Although Carter got a peace deal signed, he's sometimes blamed for the Iran hostage crisis. Fair criticism or not, bad stuff happens over there and you won't come out looking good.