Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Modern PC Games Would You Recommend For An Old School Gamer?

wjcofkc writes: The last time I was a serious gamer, I was playing Quake and Quake World. That type of first person shooter, with the qualities it offered in terms of physics, level layout, and community, produced for me some very fun times. I have long since fallen away from gaming entirely, but frequently look back to that era with great fondness. My question to the community is, are there any current games that recapture the spirit of the original Quake? Note: This is strictly for PC gaming as I do not own a console.

174 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You'll never have that kind of fun again playing computer games, because you're not 19 anymore.

    I know because I went ahead and played the games I played when I was young, and it's just not as fun anymore. Games haven't changed, I have.

    1. Re:Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not my experience. I've been playing Total Annihilation RTS lately with my son who is now old enough. He loves it, it's a blast. Same with EverQuest. Those were the days! Also Minecraft. Feels old school and since it's Java it makes my PC feel old too. :(

    2. Re:Nothing by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Games haven't changed, I have.

      They haven't? Some people hold the opinion that The Elder Scrolls, for example, have been dumbified quite a lot recently.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah he shouldn't bother trying to have fun with things he enjoyed before, it didn't work for you anymore so why would anyone else bother?

      In actual response to the question : Doom 2016 or Quake Champions

    4. Re:Nothing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and it's just not as fun anymore

      The fun is still there, just the expectation is different. This is one of the main reasons for the roaring success of Doom. All the fun of the original fast action packed arcade but with modern graphics that meet the expectations.

      I'm currently playing Puyo Puyo Tetris on the Switch. Though I wouldn't actually play the original Tetris in DOS anymore because frankly it would hurt my eyes.

    5. Re:Nothing by Bigbutt · · Score: 3, Informative

      It depends. I"ve picked up the original Doom series, Half-Life 2, Carmagedden, and Starcraft Remastered and still have a good time with them. I've picked up the newer versions of these games like Doom, Wolfenstein, and Starcraft II and even other games like Left4Dead, Fallout, and Bioshock and just don't find them as mindlessly fun. Even jumping across from tower to tower in Doom still gives me a thrill. :)

      Hell, Steam is having a sale again. Quake, Quake II, Quake III Arena, and Quake III: Team Arena are up for $1.24 or $3.24 each. Shoot, for $6.24, you can get Quake, Quake II, Quake II Mission Pack: Ground Zero, Quake II Mission Pack: The Reckoning, Quake III Arena, Quake III: Team Arena, Quake Mission Pack I: Scourge of Armagon, Quake Mission Pack 2: Dissolution of Eternity. (I know what I'm getting right now :D ).

      Why not keep playing what you like? :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    6. Re:Nothing by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

      Hah. A Bethesda Softworks Classics Superbundle has that plus the original Wolfenstein 3D, Heretic, and quite a few others I recognize :) Big snag and lots of "wasted time" this weekend :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    7. Re:Nothing by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      I think it's more than that. I was 24 at the time and the excitement for me was always the newness of it not so much the actual game. Quake was pretty groundbreaking. So much so that even Cox Communications had dedicated Quake servers back when cable modems weighed 10 lbs and had actual heatsink fins coming out of the top. There was another startup called TEN (Total Entertainment Network) that created a IPX to TCP/IP plugin for Duke Nukem 3D. There never was anything more fun video game wise for me.

      I used to wake up a couple hours before work just to be a LPB and it was glorious. Always something to look forward to in the morning.

      The reality of it was that we were all nerds. The masses were still using AOL. When they arrived and their money entered the mix we didn't matter anymore. The stuff that was fun for us wasn't necessarily fun for them. The talent followed the money and were where we are now.

      There really isn't anything new today on the PC that is nearly as exciting as it was back then, PC's haven't really changed much. They just got faster and that's about all. From 1990 to about 2000 there were major advances that were truly exciting. Everything since then has been incremental. The smartphone being the only exception to this.

    8. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Games haven't changed, I have.

      Yes they HAVE changed -- often times for the worse. FPS Map Design 1993 vs 2010

      Modern games are full of bullshit:

      * unskippable cut-scenes
      * MTX (micro-transaction) because the game devs don't respect your Time, Space, nor Wallet.
      * Season Pass
      * bullshit DLC (DownLoadable Content)
      * QTE (Quick-Time Events) You remember Dragon's Lair ? Yup, that's what modern "AAA" gaming has devolved into.
      * Grindfests aka Skinner boxes
      * Flat UI that you can't fucking tell what are UI elements you can interact with vs static elements.
      * Multiplayer games that don't allow you to run your own server -- typical EA bullshit.

      When the "gaming industry" refers to its customers as "whales" you know they don't give a fuck about you -- only how long they can keep "milking" you. If you wat to know the general state of the "industry" Jim Sterling excellent Jimquisition pretty much sucks up the fuckery that publishers and devs try to pull.

      With that said I'm a professional game developer and have over 500+ games in my Steam Library. This is my "best of the best" of modern games are in alphabetical order (I've included the "genre" in parenthesis):

      * Borderlands 1 and 2 (FPS)
      * Dishonored 1 and 2 (FPS)
      * Doom (2017) (FPS)
      * Elite: Dangerous (Space)
      * Inside (Adventure)
      * Left for Dead (1 not 2) (FPS)
      * Limbo (Adventure)
      * Luftrausers (2D shmup)
      * Minecraft (3D Survival)
      * Path of Exile (RPG)
      * Portal 1 and 2 (Puzzle)
      * Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas 1 and 2
      * Serious Sam 1, 2, and 3 (FPS)
      * Terraria (2D Survival)
      * Team Fortress 2 (FPS)
      * The Stanley Parable (Story)
      * The Talos Principle (FPS)
      * The Vanishing of Ethan Carter (Puzzle)
      * The Witness (Puzzle)
      * Torchlight 1 and 2 (RPG)

      Stay away from grind-shift-fests like:

      * Defiance
      * Destiny
      * Diablo 3
      * Evolve
      * Fashionframe, er, Warframe

      There are still some good games out there -- but about 95% of them are shit. i.e. Any game that has non-cosmetic MTX is crap.

    9. Re:Nothing by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I disagree with "often for the worst". I can't even play a lot of older games I used to love because the old UI's were so clunky and/or terrible. That alone puts modern games well ahead of older ones in my mind.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    10. Re:Nothing by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Some things have improved. Fights seem much better in Skyrim. But lots of nice stuff was removed, like richer dialogs or the very ability of the hero to influence the world substantially.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Of course there are exceptions.

      For example, the beautiful:

      * Limbo,
      * Inside, and
      * The Vanishing of Ethan Carter

      have no HUD -- and they pull it off perfectly! They are gems in an otherwise turd filled landscape.

      But yeah, that is one of the downsides of older games -- the UI tends to be a _little_ less streamlined. I'll take clunky UI over MTX any day though.

    12. Re:Nothing by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Try going back and actually playing earlier Bethesda games in the series or even the originals. They haven't aged as well as you imagine they have. They're awesome for about 10-20 minutes as you experience a rush of nostalgia, and then you realize they actually pretty much suck by today's standards.

      I've learned not to replay any old games for the sake of preserving my rose-tinted memories from my childhood and early adult life. It's much more satisfying to buy the newer remakes, and then just complain about how they aren't actually as good as the originals.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    13. Re: Nothing by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Some of that vertigo is probably due to your playing environment being TOO immersive.

      Try playing in a well-lit room (where the stuff *around* the screen is as bright as the screen itself), on a display that fills 1/4 your field of vision (max).

      Playing modern first-person 3D games in a darkened room a few feet away from a big display is almost a guaranteed way to get vertigo within minutes. The key is to give your brain plenty of nonstop cues that it's watching motion on a screen, and not real motion involving YOU.

      All kidding aside, try the Lego videogames. They're oddly satisfying, not terribly complex (no need to spend 3 weeks on training missions just to learn how to play), and not particularly vertigo-inducing.

    14. Re:Nothing by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      * Left for Dead (1 not 2) (FPS)

      Why not L4D2? It's as much fun as the first one and there's still plenty of players online.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    15. Re:Nothing by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Outside of expansion releases I don't think I've ever played a PC game with micro transactions (would an expansion even count?).

      Clunky UI equals I won't waste my time with it which is an individual's worst grade for a game. Meanwhile, I could play something with micro transactions if they were done right.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    16. Re:Nothing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Torchlight is just a grindfest like Diablo, except with even less story.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Nothing by Leninix · · Score: 1

      While a agree with the whole first part of what you said, you lost complete credibility when listing the ''actual'' good games. Terraria and Minecraft are both child games, Torchlight is pretty bad side by side with Diablo and Titan Quest, Team Fortress 2 is becoming more than ever a ''look at my hat game'', Doom 2017 has a very poor game design (you could play without ever shooting a enemy just by keeping punching and refiling your energy, and each room is just a big hangar, no claustrophobic or dark surprising environment). At least name really good games with atmosphere and good graphism: Bioshock, Pillars of Eternity, Specs Ops the Line, upcoming Descent Underground, Arma 3, Europa Universalis 4, Grand Theft Auto 5, Max Payne 3, Rome Total War, maybe also Resident Evil 7

    18. Re:Nothing by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >I know because I went ahead and played the games I played when I was young, and it's just not as fun anymore. Games haven't changed, I have.

      I dunno. I played my first LAN party game of Quake in ages last month (playing the CustomTF mod for Team Fortress that I wrote) and it was still a heck of a lot of fun.

      In fact, the people that I was playing with were rather surprised at how much faster players used to be than in modern CoD games where you're running in mud in comparison.

      While there's modernish clients for Quake, if id or someone did a really professional job just putting a spit shine on the original Quakeworld (like with what they did with DOOM) I think it'd be a very popular game even today.

    19. Re:Nothing by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't get how he calls Warframe a grindfest (though it kinda is) and then loves Team Fortress 2 in the same breath.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    20. Re:Nothing by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      It depends. I"ve picked up the original Doom series [...] and still have a good time with them. [...] Even jumping across from tower to tower in Doom still gives me a thrill. :)

      [John]

      Mr Carmack, is that you?

    21. Re:Nothing by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Even jumping across from tower to tower in Doom still gives me a thrill.

      Jumping? In the original Doom series?

      I must be misunderstanding what you were saying, because jumping is not possible in Doom 1 or Doom 2.

    22. Re:Nothing by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      just don't find them as mindlessly fun.

      I see a pattern forming here. The older games, particularly side-shooters and DOS Doom, had to work within limited resources, so they were built around action and shooting and speed 'cause there just wasn't any room for story and dialog and cut-scenes and total-realism all that cruft they pile onto "modern" games.
      Doom was just plain madness... the fun kind. The Doom 3 makeover is a good example of modernizing but taking the fun out, 'cause they wanted to tell a story and make you solve puzzles and show off what the engine could do and dark and scary in a predictable way. Doom 2016 was putting the fun back in. Get up, get out, shoot things, glory kills until some horror comes right at you and kills you and you're left in a pool of sweat. That was the thrill of Doom for me, opening that door and seeing/hearing a Baron of Hell for the first time, going "what the fuck is that!!!" before my Doom guy screams and dies. Adrenalin. No talk. We kill.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    23. Re:Nothing by lance_of_the_apes · · Score: 1

      Another game dev here...and uh, what he said. Good list, but I found Stanley Parable massively overrated. Glad I picked it up on sale.

      Can't think of anything now that is even close to original Quake.

      *This is a repost; thought I was logged in.

    24. Re:Nothing by Faw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, didn't enjoyed the Borderlands either. Wonder why there is no mention of any of the BioShocks. Other than the Portals or Serious Sams (and maybe Dishonored) Bioshock is better than anything on that recommended list.

    25. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      1. The way "magic find" works in D2, D3, and most other games is that it rolls "IF" you get phat loot. TF2 doesn't roll "if" you get loot, but "when". This means you are _guaranteed_ to eventually get the item -- instead of being at the mercy of some shitty RNG. This change in focus allows you to just play the game and worry less about having "GGG gear"

      2. Also, NONE of the upgrades in TF2 change the core gameplay. In Warframe if you don't have the right "mods" (cards) you build just isn't going to work. period.

      So while TF2 _can_ be a grind the items don't really matter like they do in Warframe.

    26. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Terraria and Minecraft are both child games,

      I think I found your problem. You just want to play childish genocide games instead of actual _thinking_ about building and construction.

      When are you going to grow up and realize there is more then just mindless killing in a video game ???

    27. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Diablo 1 is good, but short.

      Your point about Diablo 2 is noted. I played Diablo 2 for 7 years. We used to joked "D2 was the game you played while you waited for other games to come out."

    28. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > l4d1 has a better dark atmosphere... But that's about it !

      You've fallen for the fallacy "More is better" bullshit.

      IMHO L4D1 is a far better game then L4D2 because it has better characters (and voice lines), no bullshit "melee spam", no bullshit spitters or jockeys. But the main reason L4D1 is a better is because it is more focused. It focuses on doing 1 thing well. The "bright pastels" of L4D2 is beside the point -- even though it sets the wrong "mood."

      What's REALLY strange is that Turtle Rock initially designed L4D1 -- I don't understand how they _completely_ fucked up Evolve ???

      > Gameplay in l4d2 is a lot more rich

      Riiight, when a spitter fucks you over because it doesn't like you have an "solid defense position." L4D2 is _cheesy._

      > pvp teamplay

      No idea about PVP in either L4D1 or 2 so you could be right.

    29. Re:Nothing by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yeah, BioShock is a good addition. I personally didn't like any of the ones I've played, but YMMV.

    30. Re: Nothing by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I feel like stories get in the way of good games. Chess? Catan? Poker? No stories to any of them. If I want a story, I'll read a book or watch a movie. But if there must be stories, they should be in service to the game, not the other way around. Give me just enough information to explain my in-game motivation for exploring the next section, and no more. Character development, intricate backstories, and plot twists in my games can all get stuffed.

    31. Re:Nothing by kevmeister · · Score: 1

      You have just re-discovered Sturgeon's Revelation (usually referred to as Sturgeon's Law): "90 percent of anything is crap." Ted Sturgeon is believed to have first said this in 1951, probably before you were born. If you are not aware of who Theodore Sturgeon was, I strongly suggest that you check out his bio and read one or more of his award winning books.

      If your estimate is correct, game are somewhat worse than average. Or, more likely, Sturgeon was an optimist.

      --
      Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
    32. Re: Nothing by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Yes, and "one of" the last generations to die. Of course it will be ridiculously expensive at first. Its always been that way. After that, more and more classes get access. And then when the robots eventually take over it'll be up to them to decide what happens to the remaining humans.

    33. Re:Nothing by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Eh, while I enjoyed Torchlight 1 and 2 (played Diablo 2 till the cows came home way back when and skipped D3 for disliking their greedy auction house) I've enjoyed Grim Dawn even more than both Torchlights.

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    34. Re:Nothing by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised these didn't get on your radar.

      FTL
      Caves of Qud
      Crypt of the Necrodancer
      Nuclear Throne
      Factorio
      Kerbal Space Program

      Be careful with the last two, engineering types tend to find them highly addictive.

    35. Re:Nothing by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      Dark Souls has that rewarding feeling when following the same pattern killing common enemies. I'm only 30-40 hrs into the game (this is on PS3 but I think you have Dark Souls on PC) but I often find myself crawling across the same areas (since enemies respawn after a save or 'bonfire' rest - some sort of checkpoint) or just range shooting them (also from tower to tower) with a bow.
      Skyrim had the same feel to it.
      These are action RPG's, so a bit more involved than First Person Shooters but it basically amounts to the same once you get into it.

    36. Re: Nothing by wolf12886 · · Score: 1

      This is kind of like saying "there's no good music coming out any more". Sure maybe the good games aren't on the steam front page, but there's TONS of awesome games coming out all the time. I've found the only reliable way to find them is to see what my friends are playing. Baring that you can listing to gaming podcasts. It gives you that "what are people really enjoying right now" perspective. As apposed to "whos paying the most for marketing right now"

    37. Re:Nothing by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Of course there is...mindless sneaking...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    38. Re: Nothing by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a book based on "Settlers of Catan" and it's good. Lot's of viking stuff :) And as to the story: try to make a good RPG or point'n'click adventure game without it.

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
    39. Re:Nothing by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      I'm 46 and still love them, Space Harrier, OutRun, Boulder Dash, Arkanoid, Sokoban, etc. and also this damn Ghost'n'Goblins game!!!

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    40. Re:Nothing by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Grim Dawn failed to grip me when I tried it out a year or two back. I felt the same way about Path of Exiles though that was way back during its closed beta. I've played D3 on and off over the years and it has gotten a lot more fun since they nuked the RMAH. That said I don't play it constantly but come back for a month or so at the start of each season/ladder, before moving on to something else.

      I seem to have a few games that I cycle between regularly. Namely 7DTD, Minecraft, Terraria, D3. But I'll occasionally squeeze in something else.

    41. Re:Nothing by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      calling quake oldskool makes me feel not old but truly ancient 8-o ... the dude is right, Yar's revenge is never coming back ... i'd say dark souls .. darks souls, dark souls and ... dark souls ... civilization, bit trip runner maybe ... and this thing called euh ... no brainer shoot i totally forgot i'll have to check .. pff skyrim ? fallout 4 for sandboxery, half-minute hero for pixelized retro ? ... painkiller hell and damnation for that oldskool quake-ish feeling but
      like the man said but yes and no, i dont think its because you're no longer 19, b/c i had a revelation back to the gluedtothescreen-zone with the first dark souls so bad i bought it on my xbox first and then on pc later when blamco fell for the petition ... the third i have yet to 100% , you'll just never get that first time duke-nukem or doom zone back, i dont think its an age thing, i gamed since i think i was eight or something paddlnig away on atari cartridges over the commodore 64 to the pc"scene", bought me two xboxes, unlocked one, sold the other one and now i just i dont know, systematically try to get 100% achievements without much motivation but fun simply does not exist did i make more or less sense than usual i say painkiller might be a good bet since you mention quake as your 'oldskool' :) it feels the same to play but with like more zombiehorde like mobs of mobs

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    42. Re:Nothing by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You'll never have that kind of fun again playing computer games, because you're not 19 anymore.

      I know because I went ahead and played the games I played when I was young, and it's just not as fun anymore. Games haven't changed, I have.

      Speak for yourself.

      I'm in my mid 30's like most gamers and I still enjoy games as much as I did when I was a teen.

      In fact, I have a huge back catalogue of games to choose from.

      I enjoy playing Endless Space 2 as much as I enjoyed playing Civ II back when I was a wee-un. You're also wrong about games changing, games have changed a lot but change is not always a bad thing. Game design, especially at the AAA level has become lazier, but thats cool as I've got a lot of options being a PC gamer. Not to say that all of the AAA games are buggy, short, cliche ridden, consolised, covershooter crap, some good games do slip through the cracks.

      Gaming is not as constrained by hardware or drivers as it once was, this has made some developers lazy but it's opened up more possibilities in games. AI has gotten a lot better, especially with strategy games. Whilst nostaliga is fun and it's good to look back (and replay) games from yore that you enjoyed, you cant let it prevent you from enjoying the future. System Shock was great but I'm not going to wait for the "next" System Shock because that only ends in disapointment, the next big thing will be something completely different.

      The biggest problem I have with being a middle aged gamer is that my adult responsibilities encroach upon my gaming time.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. if Quake is considered "old school" by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    then no.

    1. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Insightful

      when I got quake I ran it from dos in 320x240 on a 486DX2, its pretty old school

    2. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Quake is 21 years old man. Come on.
      I mean I still play games with CGA/EGA graphics but at the same time I still recognize that Quake ain't no spring chicken anymore.

      But look where the Quake engine has taken us - http://i47.tinypic.com/14ke7bt... think I picked this up 5-10 years ago so not up to date.

    3. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that all of those games were identical, only with slightly different skins.

    4. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest Wasteland 2, because an old school gamer that liked Wasteland, or even Fallout 1, would like it. There are a lot of games in this vein, like Tides of Numenera or Pillars of Eternity. But after seeing "Quake" I don't know. That's a shooter, and not an old one. So now I don't know, I don't play shooters much, did he like Quake because he could shoot things, or because it was a gore fest, or because the brown on brown color scheme appealed to him?

    5. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A remember Quake being a slideshow on a 486DX2-66.

      I remember Quake having quite usable frame rates at 512x384 on a SLC2-66. Were you trying to play at XGA? Hell, I tried the old amiga quake port out in winuae, and that was shockingly playable even on a fast 68020... at 320x200

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      when I got quake I ran it from dos in 320x240 on a 486DX2, its pretty old school

      But it was so revolutionary with it's mini GL port for Rendition and then 3dFX Voodoo. Got me into gaming too, being a quantum leap in visuals over the original Doom. Then after playing all the mission packs, there was Quake 2, Unreal, Deus Ex, Half Life, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Far Cry (my all time favorite), Call of Duty, Crysis....

      I left off around there. Like the OP I am looking to take up gaming again. Look forward to the suggestions on this thread. The latest Doom is top of my list.

    7. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Quake would not even boot on a 486 if it didn't had a floating point coprocessor, and even with one was quite unplayable.
      It was a game designed from the ground up for the pentium architecture.

    8. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by rxmd · · Score: 1

      The coprocessor was not the issue. The 486 had a floating-point coprocessor built in - except a few uncommon versions ("486SX" and clones). In fact when you had a 486SX and bought a 487 coprocessor, the 487 was actually a full-blown 486DX internally that simply disabled your original 486SX. Quake was using a lot of processor power at the time, but it was fine on a 486 (in my case a DX2, later DX4/133 clocked at 160). Of course once you had played it in high resolution on a Pentium, you didn't want to go back to the 486, but that doesn't mean that it "wouldn't even boot".

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    9. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by byrtolet · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that all of those games were identical, only with slightly different skins.

      That's exactly what I think of all FPS games --- they are the same, and they all make me sick.

      Moreover, third person games, also seem all alike.

      May be it is my age, but old 2D games were much more diverse. Take tron, tetris, mario, breakout, galaga, packman, lode runner. They are completely different beasts. Of course, these games themselves had a lot of clones, but still look, feel and play differently. I can understand the pursuit for better graphics, modern games look fantastic. Unfortunately good graphics has nothing to do with fun.

    10. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I was so sick of sprite games, by the end of the C-64 era it had 'all been done, 30 times.'

      Shooters and sneakers are there for me now. Sure I still play, a little.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:if Quake is considered "old school" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Once you saw GLquake, you _ran_ to the store to get a VooDoo card. That was the single biggest jump in 'eye candy' in game history.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Tons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Quake old school? Sorry, but if you did not load the game from a cassette tape or better yet have to type it in yourself, you do not know what 'old school' really means.

    There are a ton of FPS shooters out there. Pick one.

    1. Re:Tons by war4peace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a difference between "old-school" and "primitive".
      Banging a hollowed tree trunk with a bone isn't old-school music.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Tons by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 1

      Can concur, mostly. Typed them in, had paper-tape backup from the teletype before we got cassette or floppy. But, that said, Try the "newer" Fallout games, or Skyrim. If you can deal with the cell-animation/rotoscoped feel of them, the Borderlands series were a lot of fun.

      --
      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
    3. Re:Tons by arth1 · · Score: 1

      There are a ton of FPS shooters out there. Pick one.

      But very few of them that aren't console ports, but allow sights to move as fast and accurately as you can move the mouse, and isn't just easy button mashing or combo sequences that make sense with a controller, and menu items you have to scroll through.

  4. Portal by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm in the same boat, played it all in the 90s and hadn't played anything since Half Life, until Portal 1 a couple years back. It was everything I wanted in a game, I played it for about two weeks an hour or so after work, between plays I couldn't wait going back to it. That's not terribly modern but there you go. Someday I will play Portal 2 too.

    1. Re:Portal by dmbrun · · Score: 1

      Yep Portal and Portal 2. Throw in Half Life as well and possibly Half Life 2.

    2. Re:Portal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IMO Portal 2 is better than the original Portal.

      Minor spoiler(*): Portal 2 adds new game mechanics.
      (* = Listing the new mechanics would be a major spoiler; just play it already.)

    3. Re:Portal by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      You'll probably be interested in my list of good games.

    4. Re:Portal by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I didn't think I would like Portal game when I bought The Orange Box from the local retail stores. Since it came with HL2, I decided to try it. Oh man. Valve Software made a good decision to include it with HL2 and TF2. I still haven't bought and played Portal 2. I am still trying to resume and finish my old computer games (finished Crysis 1 & Command & Conquer 3: Kane's Wraith, and trying to finish World in Conflict) from a decade ago during my unemployment period.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Portal by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Portal 2 is great. Portal 1 feels like it was just a demo or proof of concept for Portal 2.

      I liked Half Life 1 and all its variants. Half Life 2 annoyed me; I waited until it was cheap since I hated the new DRM crap it had, then was disappointed that the game suddenly finished without resolving any storylines or saving the day, and you have to buy "chapter 2" to continue (screw that).

    6. Re:Portal by vux984 · · Score: 1

      They were made BY Valve. So no they aren't on GoG or anywhere else. They do go on sale all the time though; and are very reasonable.

    7. Re:Portal by lgw · · Score: 1

      I've heard good thinks about them and would consider purchasing if they're not stupidly priced, but they're not on GOG. Can they be had -- DRM-free -- anywhere else?

      Sure, just take your OCD meds and play them on Steam. Obsession is seriously unhealthy.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re: Portal by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      They were both far too short. I suppose that was necessary to both avoid being repetitive while still allowing for game completion with human-level skills, but I've had bowel movements lasted longer than a play-through of Portal.

  5. I played the demo by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am now 40 and bad news. I can't play anymore. My reflexes have remarkingly slowed down terribly. I am done before I see what is up. I get confused and pause on maps too for a good 1/6th of a second too. I am not really out of it like I am 80, but that one 1/6th of a second pause where I wonder where I am on the map and look around is enough for someone to run a rail in the back of my head.

    I am not 23 anymore so I gave up on FPS. You can try but the young kids today will 0wn you as they have 200% faster reflexes

    If you want to do something fun us old farts do MMOs like SWTOR (star wars the old republic) and or Elder scrolls online based on based on Skyrim. Man this is depressing

    1. Re:I played the demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't subscribe to that jibber-jabber. My dad played C64 games when I was a kid then PC games well in to his 60's.
      I think the major difference is as a kid you can afford the time and energy to just think of one thing, not 1000 other things like job, money, kids, why does my neck hurt, blah.
      Just sit there, absorb yourself in the world and work your brain back to that singular moment where you were so in to the game not even your mom saying "clean you room" even registered.

      That is the major difference I find as I get older. Once I am truly concentrating on one thing, that's when I notice I have just the same amount of concentration and reflexes as ever. Of course that also requires me to literally drop all my responsibilities that I'm constantly juggling which gets very difficult when you.. I donno.. grow up.

    2. Re:I played the demo by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Crazy almost 50, playing world of tanks and kicking arse, playing world of warcraft cleaning up in raids, and occasional overwatch and CS and I can hold my own.

      The thing about getting older, you might not have the reflexes, but you can still learn maps, tactics, and experience to handle situations.

      But, World of Warships and World of Tanks is less FPS and more of strategy with some FPS features.

      Lots of games out there to enjoy. Star Citizen has a large older gamer population.

    3. Re:I played the demo by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I used to hate turn based games, but I love them now since I am old and slow these days.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:I played the demo by pcjunky · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those who reflexes are too slow for twitch shooters there is Mech Warrior online.

      BTW: Your reflexes will return pretty quickly if you give a little time. I am 57 and still play Counter Strike.

    5. Re:I played the demo by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Plenty of games that don't need reflexes still. The whole twitch style of gaming never appealed to me anyway. A lot of games make it easier because they're ports from consoles where you can't do twitch play anyway because of the ungainly controllers. And FPS tend to dominate which means huge budgets with little room for actual game play or bug fixing, with lots of fans who will mercilessly mock your $2000 gaming rig for being a beginner's set up. You really don't need the fast reflexes except for player vs player stuff (teabag parties).

      But MMOs are indeed good because they usually set up your skills on a timer so that they can sync up with the servers and that no one gets disadvantaged because they're on a slower network or computer, and you don't get the one-shot kill from the enemy if you were a little too slow. But MMOs are very repetitive, so it has to be a good game with players that you like. And don't pick an MMO dominated by hardcore trolls, pick one for fun instead of competition.

      Or just play Skyrim again. You don't need fast reactions on that. Then try Fallout 3 and 4. Replay old games. Try Portal 2.

    6. Re:I played the demo by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      I can't subscribe to that jibber-jabber. My dad played C64 games when I was a kid then PC games well in to his 60's.
      I think the major difference is as a kid you can afford the time and energy to just think of one thing, not 1000 other things like job, money, kids, why does my neck hurt, blah.

      This is exactly right.

      People are too quick to play armchair neuroscientist these days b/c of pop science and TED talks.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    7. Re:I played the demo by CBravo · · Score: 1

      I'm 42 playing Battlefield 4. It took me a while to get into it. I never played FPS when young but I am having fun now and ending up in the top 5 normally. But the fun part is the most important one.

      --
      nosig today
    8. Re:I played the demo by lgw · · Score: 1

      I am not 23 anymore so I gave up on FPS. You can try but the young kids today will 0wn you as they have 200% faster reflexes

      Twitch FPS games are maybe 5% of gaming. The other 95% is full of great stuff. Heck, twitch FPS isn't even the majority of competitive gaming.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:I played the demo by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Star Citizen has a large older gamer population.

      Is that only because anyone who has followed its progress from the start is in at least their 70s by now, though?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    10. Re: I played the demo by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's not just reflexes -- bots are rife on any currently-played PC FPS, and some console titles as well. Just peruse "ArtificialAiming" or any of the dozens of other subscription-based aimbot sites that have been around for years. Hell, install one and play around for a while and watch the other aimbotters make impossible shots and win "reflex tests" 100% of the time. They will be the ones with better KDRs than you while you yourself are cheating because they're going to extremes to rack up their kill counts. I guarantee at least 5% of other players are cheating, although a given match can be much higher still. The upside, if there is one, is that aimbot users quickly identify one another and usually target each other -- other players are just collateral damage. They also can't be everywhere on the map at once -- at least not without getting caught. People like to think that it's much more rare than it is, and give other players the benefit of the doubt, because it preserves our subjective experience and enjoyment of the game, but the truth is that cheaters always win, and they're always at the top of the high scores.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Re:game within a game within a game by war4peace · · Score: 2

    No, don't. Seriously.
    It's a politics-rife, asshole-filled, scumbag-overflowing cesspool.
    Would be nice as a single-player with bots though, if that would exist.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Overwatch has a little bit of everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Caveat: I'm an Overwatch fanboy so take this with a grain of salt, but it might work for you. There's a character for everyone and they interact well for the most part. If you liked rockets in Quake you might like Pharah, or if you want a dude with an assault rifle who recovers health on his own then Soldier 76 may suit you. Really good mix of team play, individual skill, and tactical considerations. Easy to get into.

  10. Re:Get serious by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Borderlands.

    My current obsession is Path of Exile though.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  11. I'd probably suggest building your own from a kit. by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Right now there's not really anything on the market for a 'middle of the road gaming PC'. Most people are either focusing on a high end gaming machine or they just go for consoles.

  12. The Old Ones by hduff · · Score: 2

    Most all the old ones can run under WINE, PlayOnLinux, and Crossover, or they have a modern, multi-platform game engine and hires textures. I'm getting my friend set up to play Quake using the Darkplaces engine for MS-Windows and with hi-res textures. As awesome as Quake seemed in 1996, it is even more awesome now. It is impressive that fans of these classic games have kept after them all these years. It seems that those games were just that good. Many are still available for purchase from vendors like GOG.com and Steam if you have misplaced your original CDs.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  13. Try these... by swan5566 · · Score: 1

    Mass effect, elder scrolls (morrowwind and skyrim mostly)

    --
    In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
    1. Re:Try these... by heypete · · Score: 1

      I concur. Mass Effect 1, 2, and 3 are a lot of fun, though I prefer 1 and 2 over 3 most days. I really enjoy the character development and the environments, though I admit some of the levels on ME1 are a bit "cookie-cutter" (you find yourself storming the same planetary bases over and over), but otherwise the games are a ton of fun. I keep going back to them every year or so.

      ME: Andromeda is, so far, less enjoyable than the earlier ones.

      The original Deus Ex and its modern sequels are great fun, as are the Half Life series.

      Borderlands and its sequels are a hell of a lot of fun, and a lot more casual.

    2. Re:Try these... by swan5566 · · Score: 1

      +1 to Deus Ex. Fallout is another one.

      --
      In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
    3. Re:Try these... by heypete · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I liked Fallout 3 a lot (1 and 2 are great as well, but aren't FPS). Fallout New Vegas was nice, but got really repetitive after a while. I played it all the way through, but it didn't really have the replay value I wanted.

      I started playing Fallout 4, and it looks promising, but the "fuel" mechanics for the power armor is a bit annoying (though not deal-breaking). Alas, finishing my PhD got in the way, so I haven't had a chance to play it. Elite: Dangerous, a space sim, has my current attention but I'll likely rotate to another game soonish.

    4. Re:Try these... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I rarely used the power armor for that reason. When I play it again I'll get or build a mod that lets you run in power armor for free.

  14. Overwatch & Faster Than Light by sursurrus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Overwatch - It's a relatively casual fun shooter, playable on a nongaming pc, and there's a balancing system so you are playing in games with people of roughly your skill level.

    FTL - A cheap and fun Steam game, relateable to old-school sci-fi fans, a full game can be played through in 2-3 hours (or 20 minutes if you're a speedrunner). I have gotten over 100 hours of entertainment out of it, from my initial investment of $10 during a sale.

  15. online suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Eve Online --- you can try it for free

    Fly a spaceship and choose what you do

    gain isk (in game money) and be a pirate, space trucker, industrial giant, hard rock miner, moon & planet farmer, bounty hunter, space warrior

    lots of fun, play, make friends...

    it is NOT a test of reaction time, it's a test of planning, wisdom, tactics & strategy

    1. Re: online suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Eve Online ? . . . . oh hell no

      What they don't tell you is your skills train in real time. Which is great until you realize it will be a YEAR or more from the moment you start training them to get them up to speed to be useful.

      Remember, you'll be a newbro in a starter ship with starter skills playing, without question, one of the most complex games ever made.

      Facing off against folks with years of skill training behind them, their pick of any ship they want and a tendency to kill newbros just because they think it's fun.

      Seriously, if you're looking for a Class A frustration level game, by all means get a subscription and jump right in.

      ( Yes there are free ( Alpha ) accounts, but you're limited in skills and ships you're allowed to fly )

  16. Pong by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

    My big brother had a Zenith(?) TV set that had a button you could push to switch it to a game of Pong. The most basic, boring game ever. We were absolutely FASCINATED by it.

    --
    slashdot: A failed experiment.
  17. Re:Get serious by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Borderlands.

    Yes, do forget Borderlands. It's fun, but it's a console game, and a loot grinder, simplified and assisted for a generation that don't have the patience for learning twitch skills nor trying twenty times before getting through difficult parts.

  18. Re:I'd probably suggest building your own from a k by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Ahh crap, I miss tread the question... NM.

  19. I turn 40 next month - my current games: by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    You're obviously into FPS games. I don't play those like I used to, they mass produce them these days and though there's some good ones out there they've failed to lure me in as of late. Closest thing to an FPS that really lured me in recent years wise is Portal.

    What has captured the spirit of a little later FPS's now considered classic, such as Unreal Tournament but isn't even an FPS is Awesomenauts. It's got the team play and cooperation mid-era FPS's and I love it.

    I like platformers, my first system was an Atari 2600, but of course I adopted Mario as soon as I could. Giana Sisters games fit into that category well. I'm also playing A Boy and His Blob, a modern take on an NES game I had back in the day. The new one is sort of a kids game, but I'm really loving it. Super Meat Boy is an action platformer with very good yet unforgiving controls.

    Something that scoops up the old space shooter genera then amplifies is into something awesome beyond all expectation is Beat Hazard. I have no idea how many hours I've spent on that between the Android and Linux versions.

    If you liked Adventure games and Final Fantasy turn based strategies it's hard to beat South Park the Stick of Truth. Just don't play it when your kids are around.

    The Torchlight games are a shoe-in for anyone who liked Diablo - actually made by the same creators.

    They keep remaking and reimagining games of our era - you can usually find something to revisit.

    If you really want something with old school herky-jerky make you sick to your stomach if you spend too much time on it games you can always try Goat Simulator. I have to limit my time on that one.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  20. lowest common denominator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a person who also grew up in the same time, built my own PC's back then (I miss my AMD K6-2 and Athlon) and continues to causally game today (and continues to build my own pc's) the issue with gamming today is virtually all the games worth causally playing are designed to run on laptop hardware. League of legends, TF2, Overwatch, SC2, These are all games you can sit down at not have to worry about remembering were you were in the story since you last touched it a month ago and play for 30 min to an hr. (you really have more than 2 solid hrs to dedicate to gameing as a 40yo?)

    Buy a $300 bare bones kit, stick a $300 video card in it and you'll have a gameing PC that will do 95% of what you want. (you'll spend another $1500 chasing that last 5%)

  21. Farcry? by UnBsd · · Score: 1

    I am an old school gamer. The last time I got back into gaming after years of absence, someone mentioned farcry 2. I had wanted something like q2, MechWarrior, rb6, tribes, America's army, tf. When you get on servers with other games, old school or solid, it's the quality of gameplay not the game that makes the most difference. Anyway, if I got back into gameplay, other than flight Sims, I'd get that new farcry version set in the Midwest Montana.

    1. Re:Farcry? by dryriver · · Score: 1

      Farcry is great, but Soldner Secret Wars is far more fun.

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  22. Soldner Secret Wars by dryriver · · Score: 1

    Its free, has old school 3D graphics and is shitloads of fun for a 40+ year old, because the game offers so much freedom and doesn't depend on fast reflexes like Battlefield and COD for example do. Take a look here: https://soldnersecretwars.de/m...

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  23. Re:game within a game within a game by lessthan0 · · Score: 1

    "It's a politics-rife, asshole-filled, scumbag-overflowing cesspool."

    Ah, just like real life.

  24. You could check out this.... by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    This suggestion won't immediately address your nostalgia issue. But if you want to putter around a little more with games, and don't want to buy a console and stay exclusively PC, install the Steam app/client (its free).

    Steam, from a business perspective, is a game management interface/platform. It makes money by acting like a software games store (its a middleman). But besides the client program being free, it can help you access/install free games (and you can google/reddit for lists of free games available through Steam). Every so often, an (oldish) "commercial" title is released for free. Even though I infrequently buy games software, I'm still building up a library of free (dated) games.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    1. Re:You could check out this.... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      /. in general has a split mindset regarding steam. Some like it because of the convenience of one stop shopping for most games. Others mostly the militant Anti-DRM people hate it, because to them anything not open source and DRM free is evil.

    2. Re:You could check out this.... by Szeraax · · Score: 1

      Which is why GOG is ALMOST the perfect combo of the two. They are still behind on getting many of the latest games (thanks to them not wanting a non-DRM published) and a few other things, but the GOG Galaxy client is like Steam client, except it is just an enhancement providing chat, achievements, management, etc., not a DRM tool.

    3. Re:You could check out this.... by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      I guess for my personal edification, I'd have to see what specific Steam DRM features are they objecting to.

      Yes, there is an implied requirement to have working steam/publisher servers to permit installation or allow gameplay, but that can be addressed by backups. If you backup the steam folder, and individually backup each game, you should be able to install/run each game offline (thus indefinitely).

      Steam does limit you to three game installs, but you can still remove a game install from a machine, and move it to another (thus install more than 3 times). You can even "lend" your game license through "family mode".

      There are instances where Steam will ruthlessly remove your account access, but that doesn't stop you from running your games offline. When those games don't work, its generally the multiplayer online aspect. But if a game is online, it would shutout by the online game server anyway.

      So, what specific Steam situations are people objecting to the DRM?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    4. Re:You could check out this.... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I think it's the people who object to any form of DRM. By the way, I'm not one of them. My only problem with steam is I never have enough spare money when the Semiannual Steam Sales take place.

  25. Xonotic by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    Modern FPS based on DP engine and tons of fun servers with modified game plays. http://www.xonotic.org/

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  26. Did no one play Starseige: Tribes? by dvsDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I spent a good year on that game. Best FPS of it's day.

  27. TF2 by musicon · · Score: 1

    Like you, I was playing on the PC well before Wolf3d, Doom, Quake, etc came out. Most current modern games (like the current iterations of Doom, Overwatch, etc.) are too flashy and have too many different colors, landscape and building details, and distractions for me to be able to focus well on the hunt. I'd recommend TF2.Half-Life, HL2 (and episode 1 & 2) are good as well. Also Portal and Portal 2.All of them use older, more simple engines that won't support all of the flashy effects, and as a byproduct make it easier for me to understand what's going on around me. Plus, they work well and don't need cutting-edge PCs as well. Now get off my lawn!

  28. Doom (2016) by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    The most recent iteration of Doom IMO captured all the things that made the original great. Arcade style fast paced action. Basic map navigation (find keys, unlock doors). Interesting bosses, it can be quite challenging, and best of all none of that hyper realistic stuff that seems to bog down modern games like weapon reloading, only being able to carry 1 big gun etc.

    I highly recommend it.

  29. CS, TF2, Portal... by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

    I don't know if you're going to find anything these days that matches that experience. I think a number of suggestions by other posters are good. Half-Life (1 specifically) was a very good game, on a versatile engine that became used for multiple community efforts. The Half-Life mod Counter-Strike was very popular, and the derivative Counter-Strike : Global Offensive is currently popular. Team-Fortress 2 is another game with roots in a Half-Life mod. Portal and Portal 2 are must play first person...err... puzzlers, with gobs of community content. While nothing is particularly nostalgic about Portal, it is somewhat of a gamer staple. As an afterthought, Borderlands might be worth looking into as well. Lots of humor and generally just a good FPS experience overall.

  30. Submitter Here - Quake Champions by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    Going through the comments so far, I took a look at Quake Champions. Just what I have been wanting. Now we will see how my own personal age factor affects the enjoy ability.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Submitter Here - Quake Champions by wjcofkc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Update: Damn I did not expect so many hoops just to download and install a game. I really am getting old. Back in my day...

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re:Submitter Here - Quake Champions by Szeraax · · Score: 1

      The day I don't have mod points! Back in my day...

    3. Re:Submitter Here - Quake Champions by jeepies · · Score: 1

      Team Fortress 2 is a decedent of Quake/Quake World/Team Fortress. It's a few years old, but still one of the more popular games on Steam. It usually has 70,000-80,000 concurrent players around peak time. It's also free to play so no cost to try it.

    4. Re:Submitter Here - Quake Champions by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I'll check it out.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  31. Old school and off-the-wall by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

    If you want old time FPS fun without worrying about such details as what's plausible, try out Redneck Rampage, the expansion pack Redneck Rampage: Suckin' Grits on Route 66 and the sequel Redneck Rampage Rides Again! Lots of surrealistic violence at several different difficulty levels. Yes, the clipping's a tad careless so that if you kill somebody behind a barrier their arm might stick through, but for me, at least, that just adds to the charm. Written for DOS, it plays under Windows, or in DOSBox, and if you're running Linux, it works just fine under Wine.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  32. Overwatch by rutabagaman · · Score: 2

    The kids are in to Overwatch for FPS these days, but if you've been out of PC gaming for a while you might want to check out Bioshock. Single player only, but even my wife was hooked after playing for 5 minutes.

    --
    (insert witty/esoteric/dumb quote here)
  33. Try these by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    Doom (2016) and Quake Champions are pretty close to their ancestors. Quake Champions even features a map which closely resembles the one in Quake 3.

  34. Need for Speed Hot Pursuit by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Dragon Age (any) and Mass Effect 1-3 (skip Andromeda, buggy mess). Pilliars of Eternity, Tyranny and Divinity Original Sin. Torchlight I&II, The Adventures of Van Helsing. Street Fighter 4 (not 5), Injustice & Mortal Kombat 9/10. Ys, Xanadu Next or pretty much anything from Nihon Falcom. Sonic & Sega Racing Transformed (great game, lousy title). Cave Story, Momodora I-IV, Freedom Planet, Shadow Complex, Rayman Origins. Fire Pro Wrestling.

    I'm mostly a "PC Console Gamer" to be fair. My bro's a strategy gamer and there's something of a renaissance going on if you've got the cash (the games are usually about $60-$100 if you buy the expansions, and you will buy the expansions). But I can't speak to those.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  35. Duke Nukem 3D fan here by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    Bioshock for sure. Deus Ex, masterful. Get the original, skip Invisible War, and continue with Human Revolution. Borderlands was a lot of fun. Half life, not nearly as inventive as I wished. Same with Crysis, and Halo. I tried Fallout 3 but couldn't get into it. No ammo anywhere and a vast world with few clues what to do. I hear Fallout New Vegas is a different story altogether so that's what I'm trying next. I did play Duke Nukem Forever all the way through, just because.

    1. Re:Duke Nukem 3D fan here by kbrannen · · Score: 1

      I'll second BioShock and it's sequel. I have but have yet to play #3 so I can't comment on that. On Steam, you can get the predecessors System Shock 1 & 2. Others have mentioned Portal 1 & 2 and I'll agree.

      In additions to Steam, head over to GOG.com and see what they have. For example I lost Myst during some move and I bought it for $5 when it was on sale and enjoyed some old memories.

      I wished I had more time to play as there are some good ones out there, even for us mumble>40mumble players.

  36. Re: hl2comic.com by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Yes, Half Life 2 is well worth it, because then you can enjoy the Concerned parody comic that much more. At least watch one of the playthroughs on YouTube if you can't be bothered to work the puzzles yourself.

    Haven't played HL1 yet, still waiting for that fan-based remastered remake... is it ready yet?

  37. PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    I've never played it myself, but it's getting a lot of love on some video game podcasts I listen to. Some of the guys on Giant Bomb are old farts like you & I too.

    I just confirmed, it can be played first or third person.

  38. Starcraft by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2
    --
    I tend to rant.
  39. Re:Doom (2016) - Completely Agree! by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2

    Doom (2016) is a very much a modern interpretation of old school shooters like Quake - way more than other modern FPSs like CoD, BF, Halo, etc. It captured the over the top speed, action, fun factor, etc. perfectly and the changes they introduced fit perfectly. The new Wolfenstein is also quite good, but I enjoyed the new Doom more.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  40. Swarmed by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

    The spirit of the original Quake?

    Devil Daggers.

  41. Your Experience Isn't Everyones by skam240 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The average age of a gamer in 2016 was 35. http://essentialfacts.theesa.c... . I realize that what constitutes a gamer can differ widely based on who you ask but what this assuredly says in that adults play lots of games.

    In other words getting older does not equal too old for video games. Sure, your personal tastes have changed over time, mine have too. I have no use for pro sports anymore and I used to love that stuff when I was a kid. Some one starts rattling off team and player names at me now and my eyes just glaze over. (My favorite is when some one asks me if I caught "the game" last night. What the hell are you even talking about?) Do I think pro sports are childish and for kids? Of course not, tons of adults enjoy them. Pro sports just arent to my taste.

    I still enjoy video games however and am well into being a responsible adult (although I have less time for them nowadays :( ). Don't confuse your own experience with everyone's reality.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Your Experience Isn't Everyones by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sure you still played them, but tell me that by the end of the C-64 era you weren't kind of sick of sprite games?

      At this point I feel the same about 3d shooters and sneakers. Sure new eye candy is always nice to see, but other than that, it's same old same old.

      At least computer power has gotten us past 'hall games'. But open environs are also old at this point. It's just down to storytelling, the mechanics are old and tired. Most stuff, already been done better than 90% of new content.

      We need a new 'Redneck Rampage'. That was a good one. All sorts of topical things from the news a fearless dev could incorporate in 'Redneck Rampage 2017'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  42. Re:Quake Champions and Unreal by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Uh, quake champions has a railgun..
    https://quake.bethesda.net/en/...

  43. Re:Games for the 40+ :) by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    See, to me, one of the reasons I still play quake style games is the quick matches. I can play for 10 minutes, or an hour. No grinding. It's the MMOs I don't have time for (I didn't have time for them in my 20s either).

  44. Re:Dusk by steak · · Score: 1

    seconded

  45. Indie Games by snookiex · · Score: 2

    There are really good modern old-school games made by indie developers/studios. The Humble Bundle is a good way to start. Here is a somewhat outdated list of bundles. Many of those games can be bought on Steam too.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  46. Strategy by fadethepolice · · Score: 1

    I'd recommend Crusader Kings 2. It's not exactly turn based but its pretty close, and if you like the old strategy games you may like this.

  47. Re:No such thing. by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

    Super hexagon gives lie to your sentiment.

  48. The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I too was a hardcore Doom, Quake and Quake Wars player, because well, they showcased the hardware I continued to upgrade. There was of course Unreal Tournament and Quake 3 because who didn't frag back then. Before that though, the games that excited me were Bard's Tale 1 and 3 and the wonder I felt in the simulated world of the Bard's Tale was the same kind of experience I took away from the first 200 hours I put into The Witcher 3 (which by the way was my first contact with the Witcher series).

    So... TW3 Wild Hunt is the recommendation for an old school gamer like me, though it's not an FPS, which I'll note you didn't specify it needed to be FPS.

    Good luck finding that elusive experience.

  49. Red Faction by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    Red Faction was the most amazing game of that era. It still, to this day, has a huge community and I've seen new maps being made for it. Red Faction was the first game to let you alter your world. Pull out a rocket launcher and play through the wall, floor, ceiling, etc. As you change the environment, it's changed for the rest of the game. The gun selection was fantastic and the LAN play to this day is top notch. Graphics are good on a moderate video card or usable on even a laptop.

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  50. CoD 4 and Battle Field 3 my favs but taste differ. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Welcome back you were expected. I have a 4 second video nobody liked 400K times, the demographics are incredible with that traffic. There are three spikes in ages 36, 55, and 61 when people come back to games.

  51. Single player with strat or story by millertym · · Score: 1

    As I've got older my lust for head to head competition in video games - and effort to become competitive - has diminished greatly.

    I'm finding I enjoy single player games more now that have some real depth to yhier story or solid strategy. Witcher 3 and Stellaris are recent gems. Fallout 4 was fun exploration even if story was weak.

  52. The Talos Principle by Leuf · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to second the recommendation for The Talos Principle. It will make you think about more than just solving its puzzles, and some of that may be what you need for the experience to be memorable as an adult. Portal and Portal 2 are also excellent.

  53. Urban Terror by dkman · · Score: 2

    cross platform and free. cant beat that with a stick.
    http://www.urbanterror.info/ho...

    --
    I refuse to sign
  54. Forget FPS, fly FPV instead. by func · · Score: 1

    Seriously, used to rock a 45 ms ping in Quake back when most players were still on dialup. Boring compared to flying a FPV racing quad via goggles. Check out multicopter on reddit, you'll only use your computer for sim time and 3D printing upgrades.

  55. Lots of new things to try by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    Starseige Tribes is still going. Mech warrior online is a new take on an old classic. Counterstrike (various incarnations). Team Fortress 2 (or just TF2 to those who play it, it's probably the closest to Quake World).

  56. Ballistic Overkill by Wokan · · Score: 1

    The pinnacle of Quake 1 was Mega Team Fortress afaic. Just started playing Ballistic Overkill and I'm having a blast with it. Any game that doesn't need me to fire up wine, VirtualBox, or PlayOnLinux is even better in my book.

  57. Re:I'd probably suggest building your own from a k by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Naw, I disagree. The shooters tend to be marketed to high end rings only, but there are a lot of games I like that work on my system great. The gamergodz will diasgree but I am not playing in their silly world. Fallout 4 does not need a high end rig, neither does Skyrim, the new Thief reboot, Tomb Raider reboot, all worked great for me. I was not getting 100fps but 30 is good enough to enjoy games if you're not constantly twitching.

    At a certain point your average PC with 8GB and a $100 graphics card became good enough. You no longer needed to upgrade to top end hardware just to play the latest fad. And the game makers like this because the market is so much larger if it's not restricted to only the elites. Don't get the largest resolution monitor you can because that will hurt the performance, and I think this is the primary reason why top end games keep wanting the bigger and badder gfx cards because they want that 4K video.

    And don't play the latest games, they're all crap anyway. Play a 3 to 5 year old game instead, the prices will have dropped.

  58. Re:Games for the 40+ :) by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    MMOs are mostly set up to appeal to the 10-30 minute crowd. It's the WoW model, with tiny microquests that give continuous positive feedback. Ie, get in, finish a few quests, talk to friends, and log out in under an hour. Now the instances and raids take longer, but not excessively so for the most part (can take longer to find a group than to do the content). But soloing an MMO doesn't require the bladder control like they used to. And in many MMOs you don't need to grind, it's optional, and the hard part is ignoring the players who tell you that you have to grind because they all assume your end goal is top tier PvP and PvE.

  59. SPACE...... by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    Wing Commander.

    Xwing VS TIE Fighter.

  60. Old School Gamer by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

    Quake is not an old-school game. Most first person shooters are just prettier versions of the same thing.

    How about Sopwith Camel and Ancient Art of War? The later was the original tower defense game, only there was only one tower.

  61. Re:Serious Sam series by Epsilon+Moonshade · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. None of this "taking cover" bullshit - just keep firing until you or the literal thousands of enemies are gone, or run away to wherever that last health pack you saw was.

    I'll suggest Serious Sam 2 though - 1 wasn't -bad-, I just didn't like the level design in a lot of places. YMMV, etc.

  62. Yes and No. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    Our hobby has grown alot, and in many different directions, and so have you, and so has anyone who will answer you. Lately, gaming has also done something a great deal less common: it has united many different traditions into one modernity. I could show you something that I feel is a revival of the old ways. But my old ways aren't your old ways; four different kinds of console gamer still exist even though only three kinds of console still exist, and the PC is exponentially more riddled with tiny little zeitgeists that got amalgamated into what we have now. At this point if you're playing modern games, even the console/PC distinction only matters when somebody asks you what "retro" looks like.

    My point is this: I could say that a game feels like Quake to me. But I probably didn't get out of it what you did. I only experienced Doom and Quake as shareware until long after they were already retro. I never got the slightest taste of what real multiplayer gaming is like until they put it on the N64, where you could have a whole four people and a ridiculous number of bots. And what if I did get the same thing out of it? Do you have any idea how many of my favorites from 20 years ago I've gone back to and couldn't stand? There was just so much the medium hadn't done yet, you know? I always wait tearful years for remakes of these things to see if the dev team can pull off that strange and rare magic of taking what I loved from the old days and genuinely improving it with what we've learned since then. Almost nobody does it right, because they think the important part is something I don't think is important, or maybe all they modernized is the graphics and the gameplay is still too old-school to be fun, or maybe they're trying to wedge in a stupid new business model, or maybe the idea just doesn't actually work and I come to discover I liked it because I was a stupid kid.

    Home is a time, not a place. You can't play Quake again. I mean... you can. There are source ports of it. Loads of people play it all over the place. For all I know, even the community feels exactly like it used to. Won't you just rediscover why you left the first time? Maybe the reason you left is genuinely that you were too busy, and it'll work just as well as it ever did. So, it can't hurt to try. It probably won't work, though.

    If it doesn't work... get Doom. The one made in 2016. It's called Doom. Yes, I know, that's confusing. I'm sorry. It's basically perfect at giving you the old feeling without being the old thing, to the point that it makes all my hemming and hawing look like bullshit. I don't know how they did it, nobody else has ever done it that well. Maybe they actually made a pact with the Devil?

    Sorry if that was too long, I'm high on cough syrup.

  63. Re:game within a game within a game by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Not everyone can handle it. That's what makes it fun.

    "handle"?

    OP is saying the game is both not fun to play and full of obtuse asshats. That's not something you "handle" it's something a rational person avoids.

    This isn't like SEAL training where only the best can "handle" it.

    EVE Online is more like CrossFit for nerds with poor social skills.

    This is all imho of course. It's gaming and if people want to play it fine. But as far as an honest summary when making a recommendation, OP is basically right on.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  64. Windows 10 Solitaire by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    It's almost as fun as Windows 3.1 Solitaire was.

    (Yes, I know, don't ruin it)

  65. Any current preconfectioned gaming PC will do by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Just get any preconfectioned gaming PC that fits your needs, preferably one that is quiet, small and relatively cheap. MSI and Acer have neat gaming PCs.

    With a ready made system you won't have the hassle of fiddling with current hardware and most hardware today is perfectly sufficient for playing current games at 1080P with regular settings.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  66. A (programming) game of Space(s) exploration by kruhft · · Score: 1
    Explain:

    https://github.com/BusFactor1I...

    It's a Korn Shell script.

    Check the readme above for a bit more of an explanation. It's fun. And really challenging, even though there's only 3 words and 3 bits to work with on the virtual machine, a 'Seed'. You combine the words together and see if the calculation computes correctly based on your assumption on a non-deterministic machine. It starts out easy, but it get's difficult quickly. Here's the start. Check the github for the rest: #!/bin/ksh DEBUG=t # expect - test your expectations # # BusFactor1 Inc. # 2017 # License: AGPL set +k tee () { echo -n "$1 " /usr/bin/tee $2 } function tri { # execute the next word if x is 1 x=$(

  67. Still some Arena FPS by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    Recently, I've been enjoying Toxikk; their tagline is "frag like it's 1999". My one complaint about its single player / campaign mode is that it seems like the difficulties can use some tweaking - enemies either thoroughly ignore your existence, or the next difficulty up, they'll become champion marksmen who never miss...but it's still fun, there is a free version, the only DLC is the paid version, and it supports LAN play if you roll that way.

    Also supporting LAN play, and also costing $0, is Unreal Tournament. Epic Games has moved to a content store model as well as using it as a springboard for engine and dev tools licensing, so the game itself is free. It supports LAN play, the bots are pretty well balanced, and although the map selection is a bit sparse at the moment, they've been consistently adding them as the game has progressed. I've found it to be a bit faster paced than UT2004 or UT3, but about on par with Q3A. Both this and Toxikk greatly benefit from a half decent GPU. While you don't need quad TitanX cards to get a good framerate, I wouldn't recommend either on Intel GPUs.

    From the FOSS department, Alien Swarm is half decent. It lacks the polish of the first two games, and there are relatively few players if you enjoy playing online against randos, but as far as open source games go, and at a cost of $0, I've been pretty happy with it.

    If you're looking for something less twitchy-shooty, the first two Trine games are highly recommended. From indie studio Frozenbyte, these two games are gorgeously animated, have simple-yet-challenging game mechanics, aren't ridiculously long, and are generally enjoyable. While they lack solid replay value due to the puzzles lacking wide varieties of solutions, there's usually at least two and they regularly go on sale on Steam.

    I'll echo other recommendations for Mass Effect as well; though it has its problem spots the characters are wonderful and the trilogy is thoroughly enjoyable and well worth the invested time. Every so often I'll pull up Civ 5; though I'm not very good at it, its complexity keeps my mind working. Batman: Arkham Asylum is also recommended, and if you haven't played Bioshock, it's well worth it. None of these games are 'new', and many haven't aged perfectly in terms of graphics or game mechanics, but the fact that they are still being recommended 5-10 years later shows that there are more than a few redeeming qualities for them.

    When 'real life' doesn't keep me busy, there's no shortage of video games with which a fellow "late 90's / early 00's" fan can find enjoyment.

    1. Re:Still some Arena FPS by marcgvky · · Score: 1

      Bump to Mass Effect. Probably one of the most awesome RP/FPS's ever.

  68. Re:game within a game within a game by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    ...I play games to avoid real life, not to emulate it.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  69. Re:game within a game within a game by lgw · · Score: 1

    No, don't. Seriously.
    It's a politics-rife, asshole-filled, scumbag-overflowing cesspool.
    Would be nice as a single-player with bots though, if that would exist.

    A single-player (or better, co-op) Eve variant would be a heck of a fun game, IMO, especially if you could build fleets with friendly bots. There's a lot of interesting complexity to Eve gameplay, but it's almost as if player toxicity is the point of the game.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  70. Bullshit. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    I'm still playing Q3 on raspberry pi with the interns, and my skills haven't diminished any.

    Playing on pc is even more unfair to controller users. :)

    IMHO, The only current game worth playing is Doom; it's progression system is terrible, but there's a great single player, and Arcade mode is great.

    All it really needs to succeed is for them to release a dedicated server, and real level making tools in the old style.

    I want the old maps; TLTF and Morbias Station. :)

    We still play Q2 and Unreal tournament on LAN, on PI and PC, lol.

    Crysis 3 is pretty dead now, but it was fun as single player and multiplayer.

    I still run a Duke Nukem Forever server some weekends; Red light district is still fun.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  71. Mech Games by NoZart · · Score: 1

    Ex-q3 pro here. I played q3 for about 12 years, compensating the rising loss of reflexes with strategy and knowledge for a time. Now i am 42 and i have moved on from Arena FPS. What really works for me now are Mech-Games. They are FPS, too, but the deliberate slowness and higher armour make the contest even more tactical and teambased, so that's my stable for old horses :)

  72. Re:game within a game within a game by war4peace · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of interesting complexity to Eve gameplay, but it's almost as if player toxicity is the point of the game.

    Because it is...
    CCP have realized they can both make some money and basically not assign manpower and expense to the inevitable endless stream of "he stole my shit plx help" complaints by letting the sandbox manage itself. I am yet to encounter another game where being an asshole pays more than not being an asshole.

    I played EVE for years, I am not talking out of my ass. First time I played between 2009 and 2010 IIRC and then I played between 2013 and 2015. First stretch I was mostly a PvE player who at some point got into Nullsec, running complexes with a friend. We were renters and it was okay, until some big alliance pissed another big alliance and we were collateral victims. That would have been fine and dandy, fecal matter happens, but we were, as renters, promised safe passage by the victor, only for that promise to be promptly erased the moment we exited the station. We were smart enough to do our first attempt empty-handed, but it was a lesson to remember. Shortly after, I was searching for another nullsec corporation and despite being totally not interested in politics, I was considered a spy because "you were in a corp which was in an alliance which was at some point an enemy of an alliance which at some point was our ally". Now that was some weird paranoid shit right there.
    Second stretch I came back tot he game and went straight to a very large coalition, my account being vouched by a real life friend who was already there. I played as an Industrial character, building ships and modules for the corporation I was in and doing trading. Nothing aggressive towards anyone, just ordering raw materials and turning them into ammo, modules, ships and drones. It was peaceful, I liked research and so on. Even so I got betrayed a couple times, once by a member of my own corporation and once by a friendly corporation. I finally left EVE again when the same situation as before happened: big coalitions getting at each other's throats for no reason other than "for lulz" with the full assortment of betrayals, backstabbing, theft and general assholery.

    That toxic environment is not for me.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  73. Re:Get serious by war4peace · · Score: 1

    At 37, both my age and genetics (I have slower-than-average reaction times) make me a disaster at twitch skills. that might make me an "Untermensch" according to your own thresholds, but it also makes Borderlands a fun game to me. Playing it co-op with a couple of like-minded friends has provided me enormous entertainment.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  74. Old School Gaming Updated w/Doomsday Engine by HiloJoe · · Score: 1

    If you want to experience the old Doom games 'modernized', try playing them with the Doomsday Engine. Updated Lighting, 3D character modeling, sky, music, and sound. Hacx and Chexquest WADs too.. ( dengine.net )

  75. Don't Starve by ichifish · · Score: 1

    As an older-but-not-too-old gamer who can only hack SP FPS on slow mode, I've moved on to Don't Starve, a gothic horror/survival crafting roguelike. It's got the occasional thrill of FPS with a lot of down time spent on collection, planning, and exploring.

  76. Unreal Tournment 2004, Onslaught Mode by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    I know it's not quite modern any more, but if you loved fragging people online with Quake, this is probably one of the best games you'll ever play.

  77. Re:Different genres for me. by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

    And if your reflexes aren't up to World of Warships, try Naval Action for really slow turning mechanics.

  78. Re:Kerbel Space Program by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Is it worth building a custom console for Kerbal?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  79. Shadowrun by maelkum · · Score: 1

    If you liked the original SNES Shadowrun [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowrun_(1993_video_game)] you can try the Shadowruns from Harebrained Studios - they are turn based RPGs in a cyberpunk setting.

    The first one (Shadowrun Returns: Dead Man's Switch) is kinda "meh", after you have played the other two, but as a first game in the series it is OK.

    The third one (Shadowrun Returns: Kong Kong) is good, although the story is a bit too slow-paced at times.

    And, last but not least, the second instalment: Dragonfall. This is perfection. The story is great, the characters memorable, the setting awesome. Try to unravel a mystery related to a dead dragon, while navigating Berlin as the anarchistic Flux State... Man, that is some quality game. I can't recommend it enough! Here's a link: https://www.gog.com/game/shado...

  80. Unreal Tournament is being updated by smbell · · Score: 1

    I also played Quake quite a bit until I migrated to Unreal Tournament. As much as I hate the fact that UT is being redone with the same name as the original, it does seem to be recapturing a lot of the old feel with a modern game. It's still early alpha, but I've found it rather enjoyable so far. https://www.epicgames.com/unre...

  81. "INSIDE" by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

    Reminiscent of Flashback (Delphine Software)

  82. My Recommendations by chimpion · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the vast majority of modern PC games are not a good fit for old school gamers. There were some very profound changes that took place in the 2000s that changed the nature of mainstream PC gaming. Back in the 80s and 90s, PC games were on average very sophisticated in terms of their gameplay. This was because not many people owned PCs, and even fewer played games on them. This audience was intelligent and demanded interesting and stimulating entertainment. Likewise, game developers of that time were small companies or individuals who genuinely loved the medium and worked in it to produce art.

    In 2000s, both of those things changed. Everyone had PCs then, and the audience expanded to include all sorts of people, such as soccer moms, casual players, and so on. At the same time, games became cross-platform between PC and the consoles, so that the audience also included a lot of younger players. Whereas the old school PC audience might resemble a book club, the new one was essentially the general population.

    Around the same time, games moved to 3D, partook in physics and voice-overs, and generally became significantly more expensive to make. This resulted in a shift from smaller enthusiast developers to large corporations running everything, such as EA, Activision, and Ubisoft.

    The end result of both of these changes is that when you have corporations which are not interested in games per se at all, but only in making larger profits from them, and a mainstream audience with fairly low-brow tastes, games being produced will become significantly less sophisticated and interesting. You can see this in every genre. Shooters and action games that used to feature massive non-linear levels with interactive gameplay have devolved into linear cinematic corridor slogs. MMOs that used to experiment with social systems are now static themeparks. Single player RPGs that used to be complex and required significant player agency are now without fail states, and simply lead the player around with their quest compasses and on-rails gameplay.

    Now, with the depressing history lesson over, all is not hopeless. Despite the overall decline of the industry, there are some excellent new titles, mostly from independent developers, but occasionally even from an outlying big company.

    Witcher 3 - This single player RPG released in 2015 features many of the problems with modern games. It has a huge amount of cut-scenes, and the gameplay can often be too easy and non-interactive. Despite that, it is still an amazing game worthy of playing. The quality of writing, quests, lore, and characters is on a different level from most games, the world is huge and amazing, and on harder difficulty settings, even the combat system can be quite fun.

    7 Days to Die - An early access title on Steam (meaning it's still technically in Alpha), this is an amazing game, and is probably the culmination of all the survival type games out there. It captures the best of games like Minecraft, Terraria, and many others, and then goes way beyond to create a sandbox that old school players can appreciate and play in for hundreds of hours.

    Dwarf Fortress - This game has been in development since 2002, and will likely be in development for another 20 years of so. It is already the deepest, most complex game ever made. Do not let the ASCII nature of it deter you, there are graphical tilesets available, and one of the modders in the community is working on a 3D front-end in Unity. This game might at some point become the greatest one of them all. It aims to simulate the entirety of random fantasy worlds. Think of it like this, imagine your favorite fantasy book (let's say Lord of the Rings or A Song of Ice and Fire), and when Dwarf Fortress is complete, it should be able to procedurally simulate any event in that book. Yeah...

  83. Zork Anthology by marcgvky · · Score: 1

    As an aging computer nerd that grew up with a TRS Model 3 and IBM PC-XT... I'm going to recommend the Zork Anthology. It's around $6 US on Steam. It comes packages with a DOS emulator. It's blast from the past!