Slashdot Mirror
AT&T, Dish, Comcast All Raising Cable TV Rates To Counter Cord-Cutting (dallasnews.com)
AT&T's DirecTV, Dish, and Comcast are all planning to raise their rates again in the new year, "a move that could boost revenue but risks alienating subscribers who have been ditching their traditional TV subscriptions in record numbers," reports Dallas News. From the report: Cable and satellite providers are hoping to squeeze more money from consumers who remain loyal to their packages with hundreds of channels, Philip Cusick, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst, said in a note this week, even though "this strategy could accelerate video sub declines." The latest price increases come as cord-cutting accelerates. In the third quarter, the TV industry saw its largest ever rate of decline, with subscribers shrinking by 3.7 percent, according to MoffettNathanson LLC. Consumers are dropping traditional TV for lower-cost online options like Netflix Inc. and slimmer TV options from Hulu and YouTube.
DirecTV is raising rates on all English-language video packages by $3 to $8 a month while hiking fees for regional sports networks by $1 to $1.90 in most markets. Dish said it's increasing prices for English-language video packages by $3 to $5 a month. Altice USA, the fourth-largest cable operator, recently raised rates by 3 percent on Optimum subscribers. Comcast, the largest U.S. cable company, is raising its fee for regional sports networks by $1.50 on average and its fee for broadcast channels by $2 a month, according to Cusick. Charter Communications Inc., the second-largest U.S. cable provider, recently boosted its monthly fee for a set-top box by about 50 cents and its broadcast channel fee by about $1. Charter operates as Spectrum in Dallas-Fort Worth.
DirecTV is raising rates on all English-language video packages by $3 to $8 a month while hiking fees for regional sports networks by $1 to $1.90 in most markets. Dish said it's increasing prices for English-language video packages by $3 to $5 a month. Altice USA, the fourth-largest cable operator, recently raised rates by 3 percent on Optimum subscribers. Comcast, the largest U.S. cable company, is raising its fee for regional sports networks by $1.50 on average and its fee for broadcast channels by $2 a month, according to Cusick. Charter Communications Inc., the second-largest U.S. cable provider, recently boosted its monthly fee for a set-top box by about 50 cents and its broadcast channel fee by about $1. Charter operates as Spectrum in Dallas-Fort Worth.
A shame, but if they jack up my costs, I'll just pull the plug and get free HDTV from my HDTV antenna at 1080p resolution.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Great, this is excellent for short-term revenue, which is all that matters.
Next, more commercials should be added.
Selling more commercials will increase revenue
Revenue will be increased with more commercials
Increasing commercials will increase revenue.
the ratio is too small.
5 mins of content, should require 2 min of commercials.
And the same commercial should be repeated at least twice.
the rental fees should also be increased.
also , pay per view fees should be increased.
people should be required to rent the cable box, the cable card, and the remote control, and the batteries for the remote. only authorized batteries should be able to be used.
heck, the tv should be rented as well, and should have a camera installed to ensure only authorized people watch, to prevent sharing.
You can buy a nice antenna.
If you want more content, you can get the slingtv app for way less than probably basic cable in your area.
You can toss in Netfltx and Hulu, and Amazon Prime.
The break even point is about 2 months of cable for all of the above.
I shudder to think what the last person on cable tv will be getting charged to mae up for all the cord-cutters.
Shouldn't they be raising Internet rates instead, since Internet service is needed by cord-cutters too? The other fees are avoided by cancelling cable.
Goddamnit man... lol
[($)]
My U-Verse TV series gives me the benefit of unlimited Internet data usage. If I cancel the cable, I will have a data cap. Weasley shits.
As amusing as I find it that they're giving the middle finger to the basic laws of "supply and demand", by raising the price of services which are seeing diminishing demand, it will cease to be amusing once they start jacking up internet service costs.
I'm already paying $50/mo for crappy internet-only service, which barely works most of the time. There's no other choice of land line ISP where I live, either. Yay capitalism, I suppose.
---
DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
We have switched to YouTube TV. Not all of the channels, but enough. Local channels, bunch of news. Unlimited cloud based program storage (9 months). Sports channels (not a big concern but I watch some football, US and the rest of the world's definition, no Fox Sports for hockey though, dab-nab-it!).
$40 per month. We have cable internet through Charter (supposedly unlimited, hasn't been an issue)..
Combined with Netlfix (Bandersnatch!!!! we have 2 endings left and will cheat to find them) and Amazon Prime (already paid for), everything from the Roku, it works.
Going to get HBO Go for a short time to watch Game of Thrones.
BlameBillCosby.com
Exec: Customers are leaving... why?
Marketing: They don't see the value in our service!
Exec: Let's raise the prices!
Marketing: What???
Exec: It ain't cheap if it's valuable! Double the price, double the valuable!
Chewbacon
The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
I recently discovered this site and it makes wading through all the choices so much easier.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
Has any industry ever pulled out of a dip in demand by raising costs?
Don't abuse your horses, please use cordless buggy whips.
Uhm, what? USPS First Class mail prices are regulated by the government. They cannot raise prices without regulatory approval. And last time I checked, most Post Offices are falling apart, yet you make it sound like they're a bunch of fat cats living the sweet postage life.
Falling demand? HA! We'll raise prices to fix that. With that mindset I suppose the last ICE-powered car will cost around 800 billion dollars. (From a new Tesla owner)
Basic cable will be redefined as Cable Gold whose cost will double. Plans with more channels will be dubbed luxury products and be assessed a couch potato tax. It will be marketed as a plan to stop excessive cable company charges.
Now I get why my Comcast bill (back in the days when I still used cable) kept increasing every months - it's all those cord cutters reducing the num_of_subscribers in the formula!
I wonder how long before they hit Division By Zero exception?
It really surprised me how many channels you can get with an antenna. Something like 40-60 here in Dallas. Growing up, there were four.
How many of those cable providers have a stake in Hulu, CBS All Access, etc already? This will further drive more consumers into the online streaming only services, which will get you fewer channels, and fewer choice in how to consume content. At least Star Trek: Discovery got released on DVD/Bluray now.
Here's the thing: In the United States, cable companies are regulated federally. The cable box they rent out to you is *federally mandated* to use the same crypto card (cable card) that other devices like TiVos and some TVs have built in.
Basically right now you can pay $160/month for phone+cable TV+internet and get an asston of TV channels, maybe 5% of which you watch religiously, and maybe an additional 20% that you watch infrequently. You benefit from this _some_ because the cable companies are merely distributors of premium content (e.g. HBO, Showtime, etc) and "extended digital basic" content (e.g. Discovery, History, Cartoon Network, ABC Family); and up until Netflix was streaming more content than shipping discs around everyone was clamoring for Cable TV a-la-carte.
The reality is, we've got it now with CBS All Access, NetFlix, Hulu Originals, YouTube Originals, but ... the negotiation power of having 2.1M subscribers as a distribution company is lost, and consumers will (or already are) paying more for content a-la-carte.
da w00t. mtfnpy?
Executive A: A lot of our customers are cancelling their subscriptions. What should we do?
Executive B: Raise the price on the remaining customers!
All: Great idea! Yeah!
How does this compute in any way shape or form?
That, and if you're in the city, get a simple unidirectional antenna;
The word you are looking for is "omnidirectional". A "unidirectional" antenna points one direction.
Other people don't want our service, so we'll charge you more. That will definitely make you want to stay with us...
Is this from Retard Marketing 101, or the new book How To Drive Away Customers?
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
Bluetooth-enabled Wi-Fi buggy whips for the discerning customer.
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
Prices will increase until the cord cutting stops!
The lowest cost for a letter from the USPS is under $.50 while UPS/Fedex is over $1.00.
You're most likely a Conservative/Libertard. You have no legitimate criticism, you just trash the government because you can. You hate it when the government works. Hating the government is a stand in for hating the US. You're anti-American.
Why is Snark Required?
I would think it would do just the opposite.
before they "counter cord-cutting" themselves right out of business?
It's just another example of the lack of a "free market" in the US. Our economic life is dominated by entrenched special interests.
Why is Snark Required?
Wow. We're only 1 week into 2019 and cable providers are already gunning for the "Stupidest Business Move of the Year" award. The most common-sense response to when you're losing paying customers in droves would be to either reduce prices or to increase value to current customers and have more enticing offers for first-time customers. But nope, they're going to shoot themselves in the foot instead and *raise* prices. Keep this up guys, and your shareholders will be the next ones looking for the exit door.
So people are cord cutting, for stated reasons of high cost, lack of choice, and terrible customer service, and vendors are responding by *raising* rates. Do they really think this is a solution? Or just a temporary reprieve while they start shutting down branch offices?
Or maybe they think this cord cutting is just a fad, and viewers will come back with tails between legs later?
Or maybe vendors have something up their odious sleeves -- the next step being, to stop providing internet-only options? If you want internet, you *must* also subscribe to cable?
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
The cable companies are well and truly screwed. Caught up in a wave of cord cutting they are at the very same time beholden to shareholders that can't see past the next quarterly earnings report. If they drop prices to try and attract new customers (or stop the bleeding of those leaving) their revenue will drop in the short term and the shareholders are pissed. Not to mention that senior executives hold a lot of stock and will also feel the pain.
So the easiest thing to do in the short term is raise prices to increase revenue. The danger, of course, is that they will piss off even more customers and further accelerate the cord cutting. They are banking on the fact that some people are simply addicted to cable and won't leave no matter how much they charge. The number of people in this group is probably vastly overestimated by the cable companies. I suspect it's in the 10-20% range. A perhaps equal number of people are on the fence and a price increase will force their hand.
What is really working against the cable companies is that not only are there viable alternatives - those alternates are cheaper and better than the slop they are serving up currently. Couple that with the traditional horrendous customer service that the cables companies have, um, earned and you have a recipe for disaster.
Mail volumes haven't dropped because of the raise in prices. They've dropped because of technology. The drop in mail volume and requirements for the pensions is driving the rise in stamp prices.
Other channels have done similar idiotic things. Viewership is down so they just add more commercial time into programs. I've seen half hour shows that now take 36 minutes. They were already running 21 minutes of show to 9 minutes of commercials. Now add six minutes onto that.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
Cable companies are increasing prices to maintain revenue growth, not to counter cord-cutting (the title is illogical), and they can do it because TV is mostly price inelastic. Consider the markets Cable companies are in:
TV - Mature, saturated, declining
Landline Internet - Mature, saturated (as far as they are concerned), declining slightly (and possibly declining significantly if 5G can provide 20-100 Mbps fixed Internet for good prices)
Landline Phone - Mature, saturated, declining
Mobile Phone - Mature, mostly saturated
No real competition; in some cases single companies have monopolies over local territory like counties; elsewhere there's a choice of just 2 companies, so an oligopoly situation where 2 choices have 100% of the market.
All those declining markets means one thing: cable companies have a hard time keeping revenue positive and keeping shareholders happy. Their solution? Increase prices on their services; in Canada in particular, they increase the price of TV and Internet every single year. They have wireless "sub brands" that charge $45 for a plan that the "premium brand" service charges $85/mo for. In short: the cable companies want to keep increasing revenue and 2% per quarter isn't good enough, so they are gouging people who won't abandon these services, and they have so little competition they can get away with it. If people want to solve this issue, I recommend making the jump to competitive services, such as online streaming, smaller Internet providers, and also writing to their elected representatives. Big Cable and Phone has a stranglehold on communication services and is doing everything to keep them priced at ridiculously high levels relative to many other markets (Europe being a perfect example). We get much less value from these companies than we should be. And without government intervention and active, vocal consumers the price of cable will continue to rise.
Cord cutting will increase until price increases stop
WTF, So the cable companies are too stupid to understand that we DO NOT want to pay so much for TV with a 1000 commercials! The commercials have gotten out of control, and on top of that now they play the beginning of the TV show with the end of the last show together in boxes, just so they can show more commercials. On top of that you get these nearly 1/4 screen bottom banners with even more commercials and if the show you are watch has subtitles you are screwed! NetFlix and others have found that a fair price to have content on demand is very popular without commercials, but the cable companies want to price themselves out of business. What kind of stupid company thinks "Hey if we raise the prices we will get more subscribers!" " We will just keep raising the rates and ram TV down their throats." All they are doing is forcing hold outs to be cord-cutters! Cable companies need to be very careful in their safe markets where they are the only game in town for Internet, 5G is coming and these new companies that are running their own fiber are now going to take away the $150 a month for internet ONLY customers. I had a door hanger the other day saying 1GB fiber to your door 4K streaming ready: $500 install $75 a month no data caps. Hummmm that is sounding very good!
The greed of the pay television industry will be its undoing. Mark my words .... they should be reducing prices to try to attract and retain customers, not raising prices. It will be funny when they all start bleeding money like a stuck pig.
Yeah my brain was ahead of my typing. I was going to say in the city get omnidirectional, if you're further out get a unidirectional such as a log-periodic (often combined with a yagi).
Then point being you don't need to spend a ton of money.
Obviously exceptional circumstances exist - being very far from a city, or halfway between broadcast markets, where you might use an antenna rotator.
When I was a kid, if my brother and I were fighting over the TV station, I'd switch check it to Univision and hide the knob. I would pretend to be enjoying it.
I'm not sure why my brother never questioned the fact that I *only* claimed to know Spanish when watching TV. He never hears me speak any Spanish when we were kids. These days I know enough to have a conversation, and to order fried dads because I confuse papas and papa`s. (Best I can write it without UTF16 support).
just wait for internet to come forced with ESPN / Disney fees.
Seeing how must of the big ISP's also have TV this can happen and who will want to be first TV system with no Disney, No ABC, No ESPN?
canada has Pick-and-pay TV system with basic max price and is most cases YOU CAN BUY THE BOX with outwith outlet or mirroring fees.
Will you pay $70/mo for internet + $50/mo unlimited with out an cable tv sub?
Or pay $299/mo + $1000 install for 2G/2G + $15-20/mo forced hardware rent (no caps) with out an tv plan limed areas can get this.
..until morale improves!
The very first class you take in Economics in school will explain, very simply, that increasing the price will reduce demand.
If they are trying to fight against cord cutters, then surely the correct way is to increase demand on their own services. This can be done in a number of ways, one of which is REDUCING the price. The other is to pump some money into improving the product at the current price (i.e. give people what they want, not what you want to give them).
They are basically just slitting their own throats here, and will cause more people to cord cut. Those people who can't or won't (probably the elderly) are left to suffer with crippling rates that they struggle to pay.
I suppose, however, this sort of behaviour will just lead to the company ultimately failing and going bankrupt. And for some of these companies, that can only be a good thing...
Maybe it is time to cut down on the ridiculous salaries for actors and athletes?
Unless of course, the remaining subscribers think that it is still a good deal.
L'Idiot
They'll badger you by letter and eternally send out "Will you be in on Wednesday? We have authorised a checkup" but never bother to come. And if they do, you can just tell them to come back with a warrant.
Or they will tell you their super secret, massively high tech, definitely exists TV detector vans will be in your area.
Wanna buy a shirt?
https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
> That, and if you're in the city, get a simple unidirectional antenna; if you're far from the city get one that you can point toward the city.
And $150-300 for an OTA DVR. And unless you're seriously masochistic, don't even THINK about buying a $22-50 Mediasonic "DVR" -- they're a pain to use, have a UI straight out of the early 2000s, and the one I bought literally died for no apparent reason 5 days after the warranty ended. On the other hand, if you have an old PC with Windows 7 and a HD-Homerun, Windows Media Center is STILL awesome as a DVR.
Seriously, losing your DVR is the absolute worst part of cord-cutting. Even when streaming services offer "cloud DVR", it totally sucks compared to the experience of having a real DVR that doesn't refuse to let you skip commercials, or take 10 seconds to recover when you fast-forward by 20 seconds.
I have successfully converted 6 people to Firestick 4K w/ Netflix, Amazon Prime, Tubi, Pluto.TV, and Mobdro. Customers are very happy. And I plan to buy more sticks and give them away to even more people locally soon.
Opposition to the government is what made USA. Founding fathers, revolutionaries, did not like British king and associated governance. This is what made America. Sorry to say, you are not correct. Criticizing the government is as American as American apple pie.
Aren't the cable companies the same ones who also provide internet? You probably get them in a bundle, TV + Internet. (don't know, i'm not based in US, but it's how it works where i live)
Anyway, perhaps they actually want everybody to 'cut the cable', and have all the people on Internet instead. I recon it would be better for them.
And since you don't have net neutrality anymore, well, you can connect the dots, but let's just say this can end up being way more costly for you if you want to watch TV over internet compared to cable now ($8/month is nothing!).
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
Raising fees will increase the number of cord cutters and will reduce the number of subscribers. Because of the reduced number of subscribers they will raise cable prices again, which will further reduce the number of subscribers. It is not simple, but Comcast knows what will happen when their prices, guaranteed. They simply ride the wave of squeezing most of the revenues from the people who would not cut the cord and switching to other revenue sources at that time.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Opposition to the government is what made USA. Founding fathers, revolutionaries, did not like British king and associated governance.
That's not hating the government, that's hating a government. specifically one where they felt they were no longer represented. The colonies, and the founding fathers, would have been perfectly content simply having representation in the UK government(the US would still eventually have gotten independence, just as every other British colony did). It was only when every available recourse failed that revolution became an option.
So, the US was built on trying to go to every length possible to try and preserve government. To use reason, civil discourse, and legal means to redress grievances and maintain peace. For as the Declaration of Independence says, "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
"Additionally the USPS is required by federal law to provide service to everyone in the United States. The can't withhold service except for specific reasons, such as dog attacks."
You'd better tell the postal service about that, then. They don't deliver to my address, or several other addresses where I live at the end of my 7.57 mile road, even though they are literally at the other end of it. I don't think you know what you're talking about. They literally won't even come out as far as the pavement.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
The article is just plain wrong as to the reason. Cable companies can't raise rates but one time a year. The reason it goes up every year is that every time contracts have to be renegotiated with the content providers they raise their rates. It funny how no one bothers to really find out why they go up. The company I work for is considering dropping video completely. The local TV stations are the worst. They charge us to carry their stations that we have no choice but to carry them. At the same time we do that they still have ads on their stations. We drop video and we will actually save money in the long run. No more theft of service means we have fewer problems with ingress noise on our plant. Reduced RF flowing through our plant further eliminates noise that causes problems with the plant. Increased channel space means we can use that part of the spectrum for increasing speeds. When that happens get ready to pay more for content since we will just be transport and you will be dealing with multiple content providers eager to make up the loss of revenue.
Neither Sling Blue nor Sling Orange nor the News add-on appears to offer either of the two channels that my roommate actually watches: MSNBC and C-SPAN. The Rachel Maddow Show and Washington Journal respectively are her two biggest excuses to keep cable TV.
Also, the only reason that the USPS is experiencing financial difficulty is that it is forced to finance pensions far further out than anyone else. This was done by Republicans to intentionally sabotage the USPS and make UPS/FedEx look like viable alternatives.
My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
Until they jack up the Internet access costs to cover people getting just internet and subscribing to streaming services...
And these days, most content makes it to DVD eventually.
Except sports and political talk shows. Or do only addicts ever watch those in the first place?
Those vans actually exist (Or existed anyway), old school picture tube TVs put out a lot of RF and you could pretty uniquely identify the type of radiation as coming from a TV.
Accuracy was no higher than the antenna on your scanning gear, so if you were checking single family houses you could pretty easily scan to see if the family had a TV running. For large multi-family housing estates, you were pretty much boned though, best you could do was come to a conclusion that one of the several appartments in your reception cone had a TV, which is not very useful if you wanna send out invoices.
Also, I doubt the technique would work with modern flatscreen TVs since those don't have large RF sources. Although with most modern "Smart "TVs having WiFi and Bluetooth support (No idea why, but they do), you could just pull MAC addresses out of the air and even more uniquely identify people's TVs.
Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
I picked up an RCA ANT3038XR for under $130 inc. shipping, took an hour to assemble, is enormous... and gets 80 channels.
Yup, most OTA is not of interest, but sometimes it's fun to observe the selective opinion masquesrading as news.
Also... the Channelmaster DVR is not free to buy, but there's no program guide subscription, and it's easy enough to set up to record half an hour on news every day that you can watch anytime or ignore at your convenience.
It is also what made America have the highest poverty rates in the developed world.
For windows (and soon Linux) use NextPVR with a couple of HDHomerun devices attached to your antenna. Add the Kodi plugin and you have a full DVR with scheduled recordings and live, pause-able TV. Pay $25/year for reliable schedule feeds from Schedules Direct. Total cost $500 for the server, between free and $50 for any client TV, $50 for HDHomerun. $25/year for SD, annual donations to Kodi & NextPVR are my reoccurring costs.
Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
Additionally the USPS is required by federal law to provide service to everyone in the United States. The can't withhold service except for specific reasons, such as dog attacks. UPS/Fedex/etc have no requirements to provide service to any location. If you're too far off the beaten track they can ignore you or charge as much as they want. It's not a level playing field.
I would totally support regulations to level the playing field. The USPS yearly revenue is usually between $60-70 billion. Simply require any delivery company competing with the USPS (accounting for any related subsidiaries/contractors to avoid stupid games) making 80% or more of the USPS's yearly revenue to deliver to any address that the USPS does, with rates defined by package size/weight instead of delivery location.
(UPS and FedEx are currently around $75B and $65B respectively, so they have no excuses for not being able to provide similar service/pricing to USPS, other than wanting more profit)
There is a physical post office you can go to in both cases and retrieve your mail.
Yes, I have to go get it, and then I have to pay for the privilege (on a monthly basis.) How wonderful! Even more wonderful, they photograph flats but not packages, so I never know when I really want to go in!
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
so, in effect, they are accelerating cord cutting through their own actions. What fucking morons.
"Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
Those vans actually exist[d]...
But did the cat-detector van actually exist? And would it matter how happy the cats were?
Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
Before the economic meltdown circa-2008, were making decisions that were just as boneheaded.
"Sales numbers are slipping. Why not try something new like one of the concepts we've had on the shelf for years?"
"Oh sweet summer child. We're going to give the world what it really needs: Another front-wheel-drive, V6, four-door sedan."
"What the fuck? That's what we've been doing for the past ten years."
"You're not paid to think. Our focus groups consisting of boring soccer moms and cubicle droids know what they want."
"Why not cater to customers who aren't boring?"
"Good idea! We'll change the body panels a bit, slap on some chrome, sell it under our premium brand, and double the price."
In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
Customers are leaving in droves, so punish those who stay.
If they were ever going to figure this out, they'd have done it by now. A five-year-old could have told them that.
You hit on the key, and fear, of cable tv providers: They're petrified of becoming just data pipe providers.
To get any kind of incremental, or additional/up-sell/usage-based income, they'd have to impose data caps that aren't otherwise in place or needed today. People will see it for exactly what it is - monopolies taking direct advantage of their position to price fix in order to generate additional profit. Hopefully that will equally get their hand slapped or the monopolies broken somehow.
The other risk, with net neutrality dead, is they start charging data fees specific to applications. Which, while also scummy and obviously a revenue generation scam, more aligns with the actions of the politicians that the telecom industry bought lately.
You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
Every company that has pension liability should be paying into its employee pension funds in a manner that will not cause them to default. Congress has a particular interest in entities like the USPS because in the case of default it is reasonable to suppose they will be pressured to use taxpayer money to make up for that pension money the USPS didn't properly put aside.
This is the reason private companies have dumped pension plans for matching contributions to employee funded pensions. Since the USPS is prevented from doing that by law and union contracts it is only reasonable that they be forced to meet their pension liabilities by contributing to the pension plan of their employees.
The fact that other entities are badly managed is not a reason that USPS should be allowed to offload that liability on the taxpayers.
Have you thought it might be your personal hygiene? What kind of soap do you use?
I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
This is what they believe will solve their problems? "People are unsubscribing in droves! Quick let's jack up the pricing so people will come back!" Even small discounts would save them more subscribers than this. They're playing the drums in their own death march.
Once read about three paragraphs of Portuguese before I realized i wasn't reading a dialect of Spanish. If you already know Portuguese reasonably well, you can pick up Spanish easily.
"The more you tighten your grip, the more viewers will slip through your fingers."
That's interesting. I've only read Portuguese (getting the gist of what is written); I wasn't aware the pronunciation is so different.
Wouldn't always matter, at least in this country you pay a "media license", which means just the fact you have access to the internet (or even just own a radio) means you gotta pay up; because you are technically paying for the content you could potentially recieve, and since the national TV station here also streams a lot of content (Pretty much all the content produced by themselves) you gotta pay up just for having internet.
Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
I feel like you are referencing something, but I don't get it.
Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
Then you are missing a classic bit of comedy. Check out Monty Python's Fish License skit.
Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
So now rising cable & satellite TV bills are "News for nerds, Stuff that matters"?
What's next - rising gas prices?
Ken
Reminds me of this one time I put cyanide on the pizza and pretended like I loved being starved of oxygen so that nobody else would eat it. Unfortunately Little Joe thought I was bluffing, so his last meal came with a healthy dose of crow.
Perhaps you were missing an ingredient. Did you try putting both cyanide and happiness on the pizza?