Slashdot Mirror


CBS to Pay One Million to Desert Island "Survivor"

wilkinsm writes "CBS is starting a new game show this fall called "Survivor." 16 constestants will be sent to a deserted island for seven weeks. Eventually the one that "survives" becomes the winner. It looks like all you get to take with you is your shirt on your back. There are looking for a "diverse" group of contestants, so I thought maybe some of you would like to try. " So, tribal counsels vote people out - I see Lord of The Flies, II: The Revenge of Piggy.

232 comments

  1. Now all they need... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    ... is the celebrity contestant and "secret" weapons cache. Ahnold anyone? Too bad Richard Dawson's no longer with us...

    1. Re:Now all they need... by alumshubby · · Score: 1

      weapons cache???

      Jeezus squeeze us, if this is about survival, leave the fscking guns outta this. 99% of people aren't trained and self-disciplined enough to handle a firearm without being more of a danger to themselves and their fellow marooneds than they are to their erstwhile game.

      Issue everybody a K-Bar, though. Digging, skinning, whittling etc. with bare hands, teeth etc. gets old after awhile.

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    2. Re:Now all they need... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

      if this is about survival, leave the fscking guns outta this.

      It's not about survival, it's about entertainment..

      99% of people aren't trained and self-disciplined enough to handle a firearm without being more of a danger to themselves and their fellow marooneds than they are to their erstwhile game.

      Yeah, but the point is watching untrained people try to operate firearms or heavy machinery is the entertainment value... Imagine "America's Funniest Home Videos" crossbred with "Faces of Death"..

    3. Re:Now all they need... by Raven667 · · Score: 1

      >Yeah, but the point is watching untrained people try to operate firearms or heavy machinery is the entertainment value... Imagine "America's Funniest Home Videos" crossbred with "Faces of Death"..

      Didn't I see this show on Fox the other night. It was called "Worlds Most Amazing Videos" or something. Had Football players breaking their legs, people getting run over, and people getting electrocuted. Really disgusting stuff.

      --
      -- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
  2. this is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i heard about this yesterday on the radio. how do they expect the legalities of this ato work, anyway? what if poeple die?

    1. Re:this is crazy by zyklone · · Score: 1

      There are TV people crawling all over the place now and then ..
      And they probably have to sign some sort of paper "If I die it was my own fault.." etc

    2. Re:this is crazy by doobie · · Score: 1

      Die? You mean get murdered! Come on if your on an island with 15 other people, and only ONE gets $1,000,000 (look at all this zeros, not many eh!), wouldn't you kill everyone? The thing says 'survive', its population control at its finest! Next it'll be 100 people....then 1000 people...soon we'll all be living nice and comfortable.....just take people from large metro areas, and within a few years, they will be nice and relaxed.

    3. Re:this is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you read the rules, "survival" in this case means "not being kicked off the island". Whenever the "Tribal Council" meets they vote one person off, based on whatever criteria they choose. I'm sure murdering someone will earn you both time in jail and an automatic disqualification from the contest. In fact, I wouldn't be suprised if the rules are somewhat like "Real World". If you so much as hit one of the other contestants you're gone.

    4. Re:this is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume that the only way it would be profitable would be to do it like a Road Rules, Real World, MTV show. They would need tons of hidden and obvious camaras all over the place. Truthfully who would watch it if the whole show was: Today meet our 15 contestents. Ok. Now Tune in for our next episode in 1 month to see who won! Thank you and now for our 25.5 minutes of uninterupted commercials!

    5. Re:this is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess your surviving family wins a million bucks as well, after they sue CBS

  3. seen that ( except for the million $ ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a three year old game show called expedition robinson...

  4. Guess what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think we should install linux on that island and put it into a Beowulf cluster with neighbouring islands (which I'll be happy to take over, thank you very much).

    Oh, yeah. First Post :)

    1. Re:Guess what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will there ever be a thread on ANY slashdot story that does not mention "install linux"?

    2. Re:Guess what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never!
      There is a redundant array of Beowulf clusters spread throughout the Internet, all running linux of course, that do nothing but retrieve new /. threads and insert 'beowulf+install linux' comments.

  5. Margin for error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What do you mean they're ALL dead. We can't have a show without a winner!" Fortunately the CBS pilot "Christians vs Lions" got good Neilson ratings.

    1. Re:Margin for error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Christians vs Lions" Oooh, I hope Pat Robert$on is the first contestant!

    2. Re:Margin for error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christians vs. Lions? on what time slot? are those Christians with guns and trucks or no? i wanna watch.

  6. count me in by schnogg · · Score: 1

    I would definately do it.

    --
    i just put in /. and nothing happens - ??
  7. Trying to out-do the Swedes? by mattbee · · Score: 1

    There was some Swedish show I read about (at least I think it was Swedish) called `Big Brother' where a group of random people had to survive in a house together on only £150 / day. The house was of course full of cameras and I think the idea was that everyone slowly went insane. Or something.

    --
    Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
    1. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny...that sounds like that MTV tripe...

    2. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by Beno · · Score: 2

      It was called Expedition Robinson, it is at the moment shoving Link :http://www.svt.se/noje/robinson/index.html

    3. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by knarf · · Score: 1

      No, not the Swedes. The Dutch is whom you're talking about, and that show (dubbed a `live-soap', and about as intellectually challenging) is still running. It started about three weeks ago, and is set to end around Christmas. The `winner' will get $125.000,-. The show has its own website (probably www.big-brother.nl, Windows Only as far as I have heard, they seem to use Windows st(r)eaming media).

      The people in the house are under 24x7 camera surveillance, a compilation of which is broadcast each night. In reality, all most people are waiting for is to see them fight, have sex, or otherwise do those things which you normally would not want others to see.

      Cheers//Frank

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    4. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by sasjo · · Score: 1

      This show is currently running in the netherlands(on Veronica), try http://bigbrother.veronica.nl Getting around can be dificult since it's Dutch only :(, however video streams can be found under 'Live Beelden', then selecting one of the cams There is only one way to describe it...BORING.

    5. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MTV's 'Real World', anyone?

    6. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2
      I saw a blurb on TV about this the other night. At the end of it, they had a mention of a simular show the company did that involved a deserted island. Apparently, one of the "cast members" commitied suicide (officials assured that this wouldn't happen with the Big Brother show due to psycological testing each candidate gets before being accepted).

      When "reality" gets too real.

    7. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by mykey2k · · Score: 1


      The people who came up with this sound like they were on more powerful "medicinal" substances then the ones who thought up "Real World."

      -m

    8. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the "Young Ones" actually.

  8. Third year ... by Beno · · Score: 3

    In sweden we have had this program idé for three years now, they compete against each other and the losers gets to vote whos leaving the island (exept for the one winning the contest). One contest every week or so.. The first time was kind of fun they more or less starved for real, they were forced to eat palmtrees!! Well anyway the first time they had to say why they wanted someone to leave, well one person was so unpopular, and they said it, so well, he kind of commited suicide when he later saw the show...
    Tragic, but kind of interesting to see...

    1. Re:Third year ... by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, I actually miss that show. Even though I didn't have a TV of my own I used to watch it with friends sometimes. Now that I'm back in the US of A I don't get a chance to see it. Now what was the name of that show again... Robinsson Island or soemthing like that. I'm surprised it has taken the US this long to "borrow" the show idea. I wonder if they are actually buying the rights for the show in the US...
      ---

  9. What if you get bit by a snake? by generic · · Score: 1

    I think it would be fun, but no internet? no computers? hmm...



    First?

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  10. flies.. the flies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so they dont get to kill each other??

  11. Sounds like an extreme road rules... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except there probably won't be a cool hacker dude, and if there was he'd be the first to die, err, get eliminated.

    1. Re:Sounds like an extreme road rules... by Fucko+The+Great · · Score: 1

      A *what*?! Have you ever seen "a cool hacker dude"? The reason you've never seen one is because there's no such thing. All "hackers" are geeks and nerds in the worst sense of those words. They are not, never have been and never will be "cool".

  12. I've got game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send me! Send me! I've been hoarding away the cheeseburgers and I feel that I could easily survive such a short amount of time on bellyfat alone! Show me the money! GreaseMonkey

  13. I can just see the headline now. by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 2

    Geek dies on deserted island, cause of death net withdrawl..

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
  14. great idea by Suydam · · Score: 1

    This show is a great idea! How better to keep us glued to our sets. It's like MTV's Real World, only the people could actually DIE!

    --


    Werd.
  15. Whats next!? by Pengo · · Score: 1

    The Running Man?

    1. Re:Whats next!? by Foogle · · Score: 1
      That's exactly what I thought of when I read the /. intro, but really it's not even close to what they described it as. Think about this: it's just a popularity contest. The person on the island that most people like win $1,000,000. The fact that they're on an island is incidental.

      -----------

      "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    2. Re:Whats next!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, not a popularity contest... Well it wouldn't have to be.. Think Diplomacy mixed with Live Action, it'll be great =;-) And yes, I imagine in The Running Man book, the game shows o' death started with something small like this. They notice rating shoot up when people die, they arrange for more, etc, etc.

  16. Sounds like by DonkPunch · · Score: 4

    "Gilligan's Island" meets "The Real World".

    "So, like, Heather was all in my face because my coconut radio didn't work. I told her she just needed to chill out. I mean, there's bound to be a boat coming by sooner or later. But she was all, 'No way. We're never getting off this island.' And I was all, 'So? We've got coconuts, bananas, and tons of awesome beach. It's all good, you know?' So then she just, like, hit me. So now we're going to have a vote to see if she needs to leave the island and maybe get some counselling or something."

    --

    Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs.
    1. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh oh, can I be the Skipper?

  17. Be Prepared... by SEWilco · · Score: 3
    "...your shirt on your back."
    OK, time to start weaving my shirt. Fishing line, nylon twine, braided aluminized mylar sheets...
  18. LIVE CANNIBALISM ON YOUR TV!!!!!!!!! by zantispam · · Score: 1

    Hrmm...troubling precedent. What happens if they get someone with a loose screw??? He gets hungry, there's no food, he breaks another contestants neck, eats contestant...mmmm Crunchy!!

    How long before arena deathmatches live and in primetime???

    --

    censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
    1. Re:LIVE CANNIBALISM ON YOUR TV!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before arena deathmatches live and in primetime???

      Well, we have Celebrity Deathmatch on MTV, but that's clay & foam rubber, so it's not quite live. Give them a year or two and some good graphics hardware, and they'll be able to do something that looks real enough.

  19. survives? by Haven · · Score: 1

    are the other people going to die? WTF is wrong with america?

    1. Re:survives? by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      Well, there are a lot of things wrong with America, but there are a lot of things wrong with other countries as well. But sorry to dissappoint you, this was not an original American show idea. The show has been around for 3 years now in Sweden and NO the other people are not going to die, they will be taken off the island by boat.
      ---

    2. Re:survives? by Krellis · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the article, it quite clearly explains the process of being eliminated. People don't actually "die" or "survive" other than surviving the tests without being kicked off the island. The screening process is quite intense, so hopefully no worries about lunatics. It is always possible, but not particularly likely. The regulations (and application) can be found here.

      ---
      Tim Wilde
      Gimme 42 daemons!

    3. Re:survives? by hildur · · Score: 1

      You are getting behind. A show just like this one have been running on Swedidh television for about two-and-a-half year by now. Nobody have died yet. But the 'survivers' have gone really famouse.

    4. Re:survives? by Znork · · Score: 1

      Well, nobody has died unless you count the guy who offed himself. Disgusting show. Disgusting people. Of course, it shows all the petty stupidity of human beings in all its pathetic gory detail, but then again, thats nothing new. It just leaves you with a warm fuzzy feeling that humans should be exterminated as vermin.

  20. Hmm. by j+a+w+a+d · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of the Steven King (under the alias Richard Bachman) book "The Running Man" (Excuse me, I never watched the movie).

    The idea is, TV Game shows have to get more violent and more shocking to retain viewers. Is this the first step?

    Scary.

    ~jawad

    --
    i dont display scores, and my threshhold is -1. post accordingly.
    Discuss /. policies
    1. Re:Hmm. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, NBC is working on a new show called "The Crawling Man" and if it's successful, they'll probably bring out "The Walking Man" about 3-5 years after.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the most interesting point of King's Running Man (and also The Long Walk) are that contestants were often chosen for these extreme game shows based on IQ and likelihood to incite rebellion against the government/corporations (no real difference in these stories). I can definately see our more "civilized" nations going in that direction. I want OFF this fucking planet.

    3. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey what's wrong with that?

  21. Goof World by jetpack · · Score: 1

    Real World must be a bigger cash cow than I figured, given the fact that a major network has decided to rip an idea off a crummy little network like MTV. Will wonders never cease?

    Let me guess, the participants won't really have any survival skill (or if they do, it will be pure coincidence), and all contestants will be chosen such that their personalities clash with everyone else's. My only complaint is that there won't be any booze on the island. That would make the "voting" considerably more interesting (read: violent).

    I wonder if Abe will be there.

  22. Diversity Applicants required, ask non-americans. by stx23 · · Score: 2

    well, how about it CBS? reps from other countries, and the last survivor is obviously from the best country.

  23. Anybody read The Running Man? by TheJoelMan · · Score: 1

    Not the movie, the story by Stephen King writing as Bachman. Basically the same story, but better: it's in the city, and the contestant is chased by the police, and I believe there's even a bounty on his head.

    --

    24-hour banking!?! I don't have time for that.
    -- Steven Wright

    1. Re:Anybody read The Running Man? by Drey · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Close.

      The contestant was a married man just trying to get a little more food and money for his family by participating on the show. The chase took place all over the country and he had to call in from time to time to let the network know he was alive. Hunters, for the show, were in pursuit of him.

      Near the end of his run he finds out that the show's producer has actually had his family killed and he's gets made the same offer to join the team of Hunters that Arnie got in the movie version. Instead, he hijacks an airliner and crashes it into the building that the show is produced from.

      I've probably left out some stuff in there somewhere, but the book was far superior to the movie.

  24. Sand by JoshGTS · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Swedish just start a show where people were placed in a house (ala MTV's Real World), but had to stay in it for 4-7 weeks? And psychologists were worried they would have a hard time adapting to the real world after it was over?

    On a good note, at least they'll survive Y2K. Course the palm trees could fail at midnight, and the monkeys would take over, worse case scenario of course.

    1. Re:Sand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The swedes had a feature, on a small local MTV like channel, in which a guy had to stay in a 1 room apartment for 48 hours and stay awake, this was a live "show".. :-)

  25. Running Man by Logan · · Score: 1
    Boy does this sound familiar. I'll have to reread that story again. (Is saying "again" after already saying "reread" redundant? Maybe I'll get a "redundant" moderation).

    logan

    1. Re:Running Man by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1
      Is saying "again" after already saying "reread" redundant?

      Not if you've already read it twice. In that case, since you've already reread it once, you can reread it again... :)


      --

  26. I hate snakes, Jock! I hate 'em! by waynem77 · · Score: 1

    The only other inhabitants are ... deadly coral snakes. It seems romantic ...

    I tried to come up with a witty comment, but everything I came up with seemed pretty indadequate next to that quote.

    1. Re:I hate snakes, Jock! I hate 'em! by Saige · · Score: 1

      The only other inhabitants are ... deadly coral snakes. It seems romantic ...

      I tried to come up with a witty comment, but everything I came up with seemed pretty indadequate next to that quote.


      I can see it now...
      "... and the winner of the 1 million is... the coral snake!! He finished off the last two competetors in their sleep to get the full share of the money!"
      ---

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  27. Similar program in Holland by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 1
    It's called Big Brother. Couple of people confined in a bunker on a remote location. Last man standing gets $100.000. Cameras everywhere, including "hidden" cameras and webcams (don't bother to click, they use the Windows Media Player, how appropriate).

    Somehow people seem to like the show but I don't care. Anyone who is willing to waste 100 days of his life on this crap and sacrifice his/her privacy must be an utterly boring type. And people who watch the program really should get a life theirselves.

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
  28. Three things to take there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The application asks for three things I'd take to the island...
    • An Iridium phone: Hello... Airdrops R Us? Please deliver 1 metric ton of food to coordinates [blah blah][blah blah] (tatoo your VISA number on your arm!)
    • A GPS
    • A book on what to eat/not eat in a tropical forest
    (damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead)
  29. Lord Of The Real World by banky · · Score: 1

    Wow; wonder how many of them can make a spear or filet a monkey. Or will it be more like one big live-action Doom, where you just wander around and find everything you need lying on the floor. Will the monkeys operate the cameras? This has to be the dumbest thing I have seen in some time. I'm putting my money on the morbidly obese housefrau from Des Moines, or the surfer.

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:Lord Of The Real World by psp · · Score: 1

      Some of the contestants from the Swedish show last year actually killed and eat a rat, in prime time. Animal rights activists were moderately upset and got some media attention.

  30. mmmm.... by froz · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm.... desserted island. I can sit around with the other 15 contestants eating banana splits and drinking wine from a coconut while sitting under an enlarged cocktail umbrella...

  31. is this really new? by Tharsis · · Score: 1

    I've heard that somewhere in sweden this kind of show already exists, and that someone that got voted out commited suicide. Anyone from sweden got any info on this?

  32. marketing.cbs.com by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

    ...Sometimes a name says it all.

    Miserable roll-your-own soap opera bs. I'd rather watch Rollerjam. ;)

    In future spinoffs, CBS will form a joint venture with that national "You want a sugar-daddy?" pimp guy posted earlier on /., to send 16 single marketing socialites into Silicon Valley. Who will "survive"? :D Would anyone out there care to brainstorm some of the prizes?

    __________________________

  33. It all started in Sweden... by vr · · Score: 2

    Yes, it all started in Sweden, where it was (or still is?) called the Robinson Expedision (after Robinson Crusoe.. duh!).

    We also have it in Norway, with the same name, but it does not appear to be very successful. We can also see swedish television channels in Norway, so those who were interested probably have seen it there.

    It's interesting, but there's not a lot of exitement. See the Simpsons instead.

    1. Re:It all started in Sweden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was quite popular i Denmark too last year, but this years version seems to be less popular. Many of the people in the show later did commercials, Tv-shows etc.

  34. Re:Anybody read The Running Man? - Long walk by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 1

    Anybody read The Long Walk also by Richard Bachman(a.k.a Steven King). Running man was an alternative to prison(If I remember correctly) These people are choosing their own fate.

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
  35. The fix is in... by Anonymous+Commando · · Score: 1

    What's to prevent a small group of contestants banding together to "fix" the contest? A group of 6 contestants could easily control the votes in the "Tribal Council" (gosh, this show sounds stupid), set up one of their own group as the eventual winner, and split the winnings 6 ways.

    Of course, I suspect it will all come down to the old "Prisoner's Dillema" (if I rat on my cellmate, I go free - we both keep quiet, we both go free), and greed will win out in the end...

    Give me a rerun of "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire" any day over this crap...
    ________________________

    --
    Corporate Jenga: You take a blockhead from the bottom and you put him on top...
  36. 16 cities, 16 contestants? by Mickey+Jameson · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a coincidence that there are going to be 16 contestants, and there are 16 cities that one can be interviewed in? One contestant from each city? Geographical diversity? On another note, what if a person or persons die? I can see it now, 16 people damn near starving to death, while some fat producer is munching on a candy bar offshore. Hmm. I wonder how I'll convince my employers to let me have a 7 week vacation.

    1. Re:16 cities, 16 contestants? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling contestants have a better chance of dying from too much partying on The Real World than they do here. It's a "deserted" island, with camera crews, emergency supplies, and most likely a doctor. They won't let anyone starve, it's illegal and bad for ratings.


      The Good Reverend

  37. Isn't this old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've had a similar show running is Sweden for 3 years now.
    Kind of belived that you guys had it first.

    Well, to comment on the show I must say It's great fun to watch if you're in to reality soaps.
    It does tend to focus on all the bad character traits of the participants so if you (like me :) like dissing people and gets this warm feeling inside when people behaves like assholes.

    Like the winner the first year. He said he would use the money to buy him and his girlfriend a house. Instead he dumps the girl and buys a sportscar.

    He's my HERO!

  38. We're All Going To Die... Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One person per day is voted off the island. At the end of the contest, there are only two people, and the last seven people (who were eliminated before) pick who the "survivor" is of those two.

    The physical survival is easy - the real winners will be the *political* survivors. Each day, the person with the most votes against them are bumped off the island. You have to keep yourself from being that person every day for two weeks, and THEN you have to get 4 of 7 votes from people you helped bump off. Sounds fun.

    a little fish in a big pond (thomas weigel)
    seasinger@nospam.sprintmail.com

  39. could be interesting .... by hell+is+now+love · · Score: 1

    if done right, this could be quite interesting ...

    but it will probably be stupid crap like the real world ....

  40. And what a success it was... by psp · · Score: 1

    What is really interesting about the Swedish orginal show is that it was a massive success. I believe that last years sesaon finale drew about 2.5 million viewers (the population of Sweden is only 8.5).

    Many viewers reacted to the cruel nature of the show, but it was widely held that this was exactly what made it so popular.

    The US version is probably going to be a hit as well, unless the reactions get much stronger than in Sweden.

  41. ongoing show in switzerland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a swiss tv station has begun a show called expedition robinson a month ago on a deserted carribean island, it's quite the same show as the one to be started in march 2000 on cbs. more info about it here: http://www.tv3.ch/robinson/index.htm

    hehe...switzerland: little country big ideas ;-)

  42. Ugliest ones voted out first? by afniv · · Score: 1

    I can see everyone voting with ulterior motives, just to be the last couple. Alone. On the beach.

    What I didn't understand is, how much of it will be on TV. The discussions and voting, how-did-its on hut manufacturing?

    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"

    --
    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
    Richard von Weizs
  43. Re:Diversity Applicants required, ask non-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For real. Only american citizens living in america may apply? What's with that CBS? Any country that recieves CBS should be allowed to enter. Keep it lively, exciting, and diverse.. oh wait, that's Canada, not america.

  44. SERE School... by alumshubby · · Score: 1

    I knew I should've paid attention to the lecture on food gathering. Oh well. Anybody ever read the story "Dirty George the Roach Eater"? Yum, yum...

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  45. Repeat after me..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...For a three hour tour. A three hour tour....."

  46. My apologies to Gilligan... by bmabray · · Score: 3

    Sit right back & we'll tell a tale,
    A tale of a fateful show,
    That started as a ratings ploy,
    With an idea that really did blow.

    The producer was a slimy weasel,
    The director dumb as slop,
    16 idiots set sail that day,
    For a 7 week flop,
    A 7 week flop.

    human://billy.j.mabray/

    --
    human://billy.j.mabray/
    "Every good system has a backup." -- Dale Hanchey
  47. This is dumb by ebyte · · Score: 0

    What a load. Like there is really going to be any kind of survival issues during this show. CBS will have film crews there tapeing 24/7 showing the structures and how well people work together. The 'survivors' shouldn't be too concerned for their wellfare, since they can just hop on a CBS powerboat and leave.

    I also bet the people casting their 'secret' ballots will vote for the more popular people in the group as to better their own chances.

    This whole thing will have to be rigged, to provide the public with the best viewing product.

    Still sounds like some fun though ... :)

    --
    My Public Key can be found in a fake rock by my front door.
  48. not Running Man -the Long Walk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bachman (well, King) again, but this was the one where contestants were actually competing for survival in terms of endurance, rather than being hunted down like in the Running Man.

  49. A clueless Brit asks... by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

    ...what exactly is Gilligan? I see references to it in American TV shows everywhere, but I never understand them because I have no idea what the show in question is about.

    Anyone care to enlighten me?

    -Stephen

    1. Re:A clueless Brit asks... by bmabray · · Score: 1

      It was a TV show a long time ago about these 7 people getting stranded on a desert island. Hilarity ensued. If you turn your brain off for half an hour, you could enjoy it. :-)

      human://billy.j.mabray/

      --
      human://billy.j.mabray/
      "Every good system has a backup." -- Dale Hanchey
    2. Re:A clueless Brit asks... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      For you those of you deprived of growing up watching American TV:

      Gilligan's Island was a sit-com on American TV in the late 60's. It is considered both unredeemably stupid and a classic (often by the same people).

      The premise of the show is that 7 people on a three hour boat tour were caught in a storm and standed on an island. The episodes recounted their futile attempts to get back to Hawaii. One of the more amusing aspects of the show is that the castaways managed to create for themselves most of the comforts of modern life (including a car and a washing machine) out of bamboo and coconuts. Another was that several of the characters must have carried dozens of changes of clothes for a "three-hour tour".

      Gilligan was the hapless ship's mate (played by Bob Denver) who while good-intentioned, was usually the cause of any particular scheme to get rescued failing.

      It's a classic of American pop culture. The show lasted for a few seasons and has been rerun incessantly since then.

      In other words, it's "Star Trek: Voyager" without the spaceship.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  50. If this is a real survival show... by alumshubby · · Score: 1

    ...there are gonna be some serious lawsuits. I don't care what kind of waivers people sign, somebody's next of kin is going to sue. The legal eagles will never let this thing happen.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  51. It's time for everyone's favourite show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bleeding for Bucks!

    You and 15 other people give as much blood as possible until all but 3 are dead. The 3 survivors get to go on to the bonus round, where appendages are cut off one by one. The last one with a beating heart wins $1M!!!

  52. Not a contest I am interested in. by noeld · · Score: 2
    This could be interesting but only if there where some sort of measurable objective. Not just a popularity contest. They should put everyone on different islands, have a doctor examine them before and after. Evaluate how well they survived. What their housing looked like etc. How well they ate. That would be a contest that I would be interested in.

    But then they would not have a soap opera.

    I predict they select "survivors" based on:

    • Girls
      • Hair
      • Breasts
      • Legs
    • Boys
      • Hair
      • Chin
      • Muscles

    The good news is that for the girls heroin sheik is in....

    Check out the Lance Armstrong Foundation

  53. Alternative Idea by mischief · · Score: 1

    I think an better way to play something like this would be to see what geek could survive for seven weeks without internet access. I had a holiday recently and went without net access for 7 days - it was hell.

    --

    --
    Everything I know in life I learnt from .sigs
    1. Re:Alternative Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think an better way to play something like this would be to see what geek could survive for seven weeks without internet access.

      Come on. This idea is far too cruel to be even remotly legal.

    2. Re:Alternative Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, i do that from time to time, i call that "cleansing." no emails. no phone calls. no TV. no music. no one is allowed to talk to me.

  54. My three things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First, one of those "survival" books for the tropics. You know, weirdo plasticized pages, full-color shots of edible stuff, instructions on skinning a monkey, etc.

    Second, a big-ass survival tool. You know, the kind that can be a trenching shovel, a knife, an axe, a saw, has a compass in the handle, fishing line wrapped around the grip, etc. After all, a shovel would be EXTREMELY useful, just from a hygiene perspective.

    Third, either a Swiss Army Knife, or a Leatherman. I'd want something smaller than the Survival Tool, in order to skin and gut various creatures I've killed. Would also be useful for scraping hides, sewing monkey-leather ponchos, etc. Definitely get the kind with a toothpick, to clean out my teeth.

    An important question though, is how big is the island? If it's small, you might be able to exterminate the coral snakes, which would be nice.

    Also, are macaques easily scared, or are they one of the confident primates? In other words, do I have to sneak up on them, or can I walk up and bash 'em in the head with my shovel? I don't want to be reduced to killing their infants . . .

    1. Re:My three things by Sethb · · Score: 1

      I'd take my old Boy Scout manual, what a fabulous book! I still use it all the time as a reference for knots, first aid, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum. I'm not sure exactly how useful it'd be in the tropical setting, but it's a must-have every time I go camping.

      "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. "
      -Robert A. Heinlein

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  55. US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by SpinyNorman · · Score: 3

    As a Brit who moved to the States to steal your women and take your jobs, I think I should be allowed to gnaw on your sorry-assed bones in this excellent competition! :-(

    1. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't we kick you suckers out of the country a couple times?

    2. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Brit who moved to the States to steal your women and take your jobs, I think I should be allowed to gnaw on your sorry-assed bones in this excellent competition! :-(


      The only part of the above that worries me is the gnawing on bones. I can't see how the rest is possible . . .


      ;-))) Couldn't resist.

    3. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      > Didn't we kick you suckers out of the country a couple times?

      It may have looked like that, but we really left voluntarily because the cheese and beer were so bad! ;-)

    4. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that the British had grown out of going to other countries to rape and pillage...

    5. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a Brit who moved to the States to..

      You misspelled "limey".

    6. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by Mr+Debug · · Score: 1
      > > Didn't we kick you suckers out of the country a couple times?

      > It may have looked like that, but we really left voluntarily because the cheese
      > and beer were so bad! ;-)

      Actually it was the atrocious television ;-)

    7. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by Fucko+The+Great · · Score: 1

      ARHARHARHARHARHARHARRRR... A Brit stealing *anyones* women! Yeah right! You english are *by far* the ugliest and most backward guys on the planet (though the Australians come a pretty close second)! Can you say "Austin Powers"? Oh, what hunky sex-machines you all are! And what would we hire you for? Fixing old BBC computers ("No dear, that's not my PC, that's my toaster...")? Or are you here to make some of your really *fabulous* cars? BWARHARARHARHARHARHARHARHAR...

    8. Re:US citizens only - this totally sucks!!! by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Hey, Austin Powers might drive a flakey Jag (no surprise an American company bought them!), but the real thing - Bond - drove an Austin Martin. Is 0-62mph in 3.9 sec, top end over 200mph good enough for you! Of course they are a tad pricey... :-(

      As for Beebs, well I did use work for Acorn! ;-)

  56. The Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone else read The Beach by Alex Garland? Sort of a modern day Lord of the Flies...

  57. put it in perspective by sevenseven · · Score: 1

    if you put it in perspective it gets sort of scary - soon enough this will not attract enough viewers and they will have to push the limit further and further.

    expect running man. it will become the reality.

    and something completely unrelated - how many more people will be glued to tvs because of more and more thrilling entertainment? scaaaaary...

    --
    ...sie sind nicht grün
    1. Re:put it in perspective by tweek · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I read before I poted. This was the first thing i thought of when I heard this on the radio this morning. It's funny...there was a quote on this special about wrestling on tv. At the end they said that we aren't quite on the level with ancient rome watching people battle to the death with each other. We haven't cried out for blood...yet.
      I fear something like this is just one more step down the spiral. Evil prevails when good men do nothing.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  58. sounds exciting, action packed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doubtful that they're going to show each person's quest for the right leaf to wipe their asses. Sounds pretty dull, actually, no car crashes, no-one getting shot. Prediction: bomb.

  59. Can you say, "side deals"? Thought you could. by alumshubby · · Score: 1

    Read the rules. This tribal-council nonsense is gonna turn into an exercise in the Prisoner's Dilemma. Gee, and I was only thinking of corporate liability when I posted that remark about lawsuits.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  60. Suicide by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

    There was an article on this in some UK TV guide last week.
    Apparently one of the people who survived eventually killed himself.
    Iain

  61. Re:Now all they need... Richard Dawson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slightly Off-Topic --
    Actually, Richard Dawson is still "with us": ie: still alive... see the Dead People Server.

    Think he would do it?

  62. Cool! by drwiii · · Score: 1
    Find me a coconut that runs Linux and a palm tree with an ethernet cable coming out of it and I'll survive. (:

    --

  63. Gilligan by DonkPunch · · Score: 1

    Did you see that one show where they almost got off the island?

    --

    Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs.
    1. Re:Gilligan by Riktov · · Score: 1

      ... and did they?? Did they??

    2. Re:Gilligan by GypC · · Score: 1

      No! Gilligan messed it up... can you imagine?

  64. Maybe they should call it... by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 2

    Donner Island

  65. Battle to be least obnoxious. by ucblockhead · · Score: 3

    The rules amuse me greatly. Every week, the contestants vote one of their number off of the island. Seems to me that the winner will be whoever is least annoying to their fellow competitors.

    There is lots of room for interesting mathematical games as well. A good opening strategy might be to find eight fellow competitors at the beginning and form a voting block. Those joining the block garauntee their own survival for eight rounds. Then, you try to form another voting block. Lots of room for Machiavellian strategy.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by Kinthelt · · Score: 1
      Sounds a bit like Prisoner's Dilemma. The classic backstabbing game.

      They mention that there are poisonous coral snakes... I hope they have adequate medical facilities nearby to treat somewhen *WHEN* they get bitten by one (not if).

      One last comment: What happens if there is a tie in the vote? Re-vote? A votes for B, B votes for C and C votes for A.

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    2. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by veldrane · · Score: 2

      True. There is a real feel this is going to be "Real World: Deserted Island."

      But the fact is, what if you have some not really cool (aka unlikable in some way) person that has the uncanny ability to provide well for the rest of the group? Or perhaps this person is well VERY resourceful but (s)he can be a real prick at times?

      Do the skills outweigh the behavior?
      I saw the comment about gaining "luxuries" through contests so I am skeptical on how uncontrolled the environment is. What happens if one of the people is in need of medical attention? (ie: broken leg) Does that mean a free week because one person automatically eliminated themself? (the pseudo-Darwin Award)

      Weird...I may have to try out for it anyway. Minneapolis is only 10 miles away...what the heck.

      If I make it the "shirt on my back" will have to either be my Batman T-shirt or the one I picked up at the Abacus World Expo.

      -Vel

    3. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by NettRom · · Score: 1
      One last comment: What happens if there is a tie in the vote? Re-vote? A votes for B, B votes for C and C votes for A.
      The program is in its third season on Swedish television, and in its first here in Norway. When there's a tie they'll probably put the names of all who ties in a coconut and then pull one out (they do so here). The one who's drawn will go home.
    4. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I'd be taking my Swiss Army Shirt (it's translucent!)...

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one will be bitten by a coral snake, they have really short fangs and couldn't break your skin with them to bite. Jeez don't you people watch the crocidile hunter :)

    6. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by radish · · Score: 1



      OK so to win you just need to be a stunningly attractive bisexual with a free-love outlook on life? No-one's gonna vote you off the island...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by matsh · · Score: 2

      No, we've had this game in Sweden for some time,
      and it turns out that the person that seems most
      likely to win is often voted out first, because
      he/she is the worst competitor.

      I suppose being a nice guy is a plus, because
      you don't really want to spend week after week
      with a bunch of people you don't like. Unless,
      of course, the price to the winner is so big
      that it is worth the time...

    8. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by ucblockhead · · Score: 2

      I suspect that for the first few rounds, at least, you want to be one of those personable, but quiet sorts that no one notices.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    9. Re:Battle to be least obnoxious. by veldrane · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I've been thinking that if there is a 'medical emergency' clause where you get eliminated if you're in a condition that requires medical attention. What is there to really stop someone (they claim to be looking for people with high mental and physical faculties) from stealthily removing the other 15 from the competition over the course of the first week (before voting). Of course, the more of them you can remove in the first night, the better.

      I know, this is a real mean point of view but technically, if you were sucessful at this, you could be the holder of the million bucks!

      "Blair Witch Project" meets "Most Dangerous Game."

      I wonder what it'd do for the ratings....

      *evil grin*

  66. All alone... by lowLark · · Score: 2

    "You and fifteen other strangers are marooned on a deserted tropical island in the South China Sea..." with only a camera crew, make-up artists and a production team to keep you company. Think about it, what your average person, even an attractive one, would look like after seven weeks in the jungle. CBS will obviously have to intervine in any number of cirumstances (what if someone decides "hell, Im on a desert island, I'll just walk around nude and fling excrament at the camera crew!!").

  67. Re:Diversity Applicants required, ask non-american by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1
    Normal US contest rules (of any type) require US citizenship to win any prizes. Probably something to do with taxes...

    BTW, is that .sig a reference to Gauntlet? I loved that game...
    --

  68. Sounds like.....high school by JM_the_Great · · Score: 2

    Wow, that's all we need, another popularity contest. This has nothing to do with their survival skills, it has to do with how personable they are (10 bucks says I know who will win after watching the _first_ show). Besides, this means that we nerds have no chance. Some ESFP will come along and win, and all the INTX's will get kicked off the island.

    I think it would really be cool, if they let all of them stay on the island and see how they develop a socity, government, city, etc.... Would you end up with a communist `counsil' where everybody did for the state, or would they develop a sence of indiviualism and what they do best? What do you do with crimnals (can there be crimnals without laws?)? Would they work together or work against each other? Would their be specialized labor, or everybody for him/herself?

    Anyway, I couldn't do this, it would be too hard to go 7 weeks without computers (unless you got a really small laptop and a cell phone, snuck them onto the island and kept it a secret and got online at night (oh, yeah, and a few hundred batteries (or....maybe you would develop solar panels out of coconuts....)))

    That's my $(2^4*3+1/7%3*2/100)

    --

    --Justin Mitchell
    "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
  69. Old Stuff by henrik · · Score: 1

    Umm, this kind of show has been running in Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia for I think 3 or 4 years now...

  70. Big Brother is Dutch. This is Swedish "Robinson" by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    There is some confusion here.

    The people locked up in a house-show is the Dutch "Big Brother".

    But this show sounds much more like the Swedish "Robinson", where people go to a deserted island, survive, and are gradually voted out until a winner remains.

    It seems to be the media event of the year in Sweden, judging from the internet newspapers I read from my fatherland (which seems to have gone downhill since I left :-)

  71. Re:is this really new? - No ! by Case+Sensitive · · Score: 1
    True, it's on it's third year now here in Sweden.

    In the beginning, you could be voted out by your own team - one was - and later killed himself.
    Whether this was due to the show, I don't know, but there was all kind of complaints, and the show was called mobbing-tv e.t.c.
    They have now changed the rules so it's the other teams which can vote out one from "your" team.
    This completely spoiled the show, because the other teams will obviously try to vote out the "best" on a competitive team.
    That means that if you try to help your teammates, be a nice guy and all that, you're asking for a ticket home.

    So from mobbing-tv, it went to be sissy-tv.

  72. Blair Witch Island? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they should leave them on the Island with just the clothes on their backs and some camera's with lots of tapes and batteries, thats it. And it someone thinks that that can not handle it they should be picked up and brought off the island. No producers to interfere. Maybe out a webcam in the island with a satalite link.

  73. The Long Walk by Wah · · Score: 3

    ...is one of my favorite short stories. It's in the Bachman Books and I'm sure many reprintings.

    The basic premise: 100 18 yr old men are selected and start walking. They must maintain a pace of 4 mph, if they fall below 4 mph three times, they, um, get their heads blown off my soldiers (it IS King...). For every hour you walk you can lose one of your strikes, but it's always three and you're out. Last man walking wins. The prize, IIRC, is you basically get your every whim until you die.

    In the book it was built up as more popular than the superbowl with massive betting on who would be next, first, last to die. Persoanally I think it's some of King's best work (before that computer started writing his books) and would make an excellent movie, if done correctly.

    --
    +&x
    1. Re:The Long Walk by Drey · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, the winner is so fried mentally from forcing himself to walk that he doesn't realize the walk is over and just keeps walking, walking, walking...

    2. Re:The Long Walk by Wah · · Score: 1

      kind of makes that "your every wish for the rest of your life" prize, seem a little empty, eh? I seem to remember him start *running*, when they try and tell him to stop, not so easy to do on bloody stumps. Some good early King that most of you could read in a night or two.

      --
      +&x
  74. Oh good grief... by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
    Like we're supposed to believe this is really going to be a challenge for the quote-unquote survivors when there's a whole freakin' camera and sound crew living on the island with them? Yeah right.

    Oh wait, or do you have to volunteer to build your camera and sound equipment out of coconuts and bamboo and palm leaves and be willing to eat sand and seashells before you're part of the crew for the show?

    What tripe. What trash. But people will watch because 85% of the people in the U.S. are blithering idiots who need to get their entertainment spoon-fed by whomever has the loudest marketing. Critical thinking abilities in this country have dropped to critical levels when the networks can pass this sort of stuff off a "real". I might even say this is more insulting to one's intelligence than that "Erkle" show.

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    1. Re:Oh good grief... by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      Okay, take a minute to think about what you just typed... just because things will probably be fairly unchallenging for the camera crew does NOT imply that the same will be true for the "survivors". You have made a classic logical error in your argument, I suggest that you go back to school and enroll in a beginners Logic class. Perhaps then you will be able to come up with better arguments when you speak.
      ---

    2. Re:Oh good grief... by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
      Excuse me?

      Why don't *you* think about what *you* said.

      There will have to be a fully-equipped camera and sound crew, along with whatever support on the island. Let's say something "bad" happens to one of the "survivors." Do you really think the other people on the island are going to sit back and say, "Oh, we're the camera crew, we're not allowed to treat you for snakebite. You're gonna die." The support crew affects the behaviours of the "survivors" by creating an environment of "Well, nothing bad could *really* happen to me because there's all these other people here in case something does." Even assuming the whole situation is even vaguely real to begin with.

      Since I'm not trying to construct a proof, I don't see how you can find a "logical error" in my argument. It's a supposition based on my knowledge of human ethical behaviour.

      Try to not resort to personal insults next time you don't think things through, as well. You just come across sounding like a loser and a jerk.

      -=-=-=-=-

      --

      -=-=-=-=-
      My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    3. Re:Oh good grief... by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      There you go making weak arguments again. I never said that the camera crew would not affect the environment on the island. Your orignal post proclaimed that because there was a camera crew that things would not be challenging for the "survivors". Now you are saying that "really bad things will not happen to the "survivors" because of the camera crew. So, I still stand by my original reply which states that just because it won't be challenging for the crew doesn't mean it won't be challening for the "survivors".

      As for your last line, it was nothing personal I just get annoyed when people make seamingly "logical" statements that really have no connections. If you took it personally, I'm sorry I offended you but maybe you'll thank me later when you have to write anything (for work or school) that requires clearly presented arguments.
      (For anyone interested, a good book on the subject is "A Rulebook for Arguments" by Anthony Weston. ISBN: 0872201562)
      ---

    4. Re:Oh good grief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU A FUCKING LOSER BITCH!!!!!!!!!!

    5. Re:Oh good grief... by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
      There you go again, getting personal. As if you have any idea what my job is about or that I would ever have any reason to thank you for any sort of advice you could ever consider giving me.

      I now forget this thread exists.

      -=-=-=-=-

      --

      -=-=-=-=-
      My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    6. Re:Oh good grief... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      "Surviving" this game isn't about not kicking the bucket, it's about getting voted off. If Joe Contestant gets a snakebite, I'm sure a doctor is somewhere near. Joe Contestant doesn't lose because he got a snakebite, he'll lose if he can't/doesn't work well with the others, for whatever that's worth. As to spoonfeeding: Who cares if this is mindless entertainment? It will no doubt be interesting, talked about, and fun to see the logistics of how it would all work.

      The Good Reverend

  75. It's been done... by knife_in_winter · · Score: 1

    Instead of "Survivor" it should be called "The Real World", or "Road Rules".

    Oh wait, those are taken.


    Nothing can possiblai go wrong. Er...possibly go wrong.
    Strange, that's the first thing that's ever gone wrong.

    --

    Tyler's words coming out of my mouth.
  76. Re:Snooty Canadian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, enough with the USA bashing. Canada's not perfect either. *bites toungue*

  77. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? or the Danes! by juels · · Score: 1

    There is a similar show running in Denmark called
    "Robinson" which is a huge success; intriges are
    fueled by the tv station and the fact that people
    must vote their fellow group members home.

    A total waste of time, if you want a real survival
    course - be all you can be.

    /Soren

  78. Team Slashdot by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    Let's get 16 people together and take part in the contest. No matter who's the winner we can share the $. ;D

    Given our voting skills we should be able to finish the job most quickly.

    Anyone?

  79. 7 weeks on a tropical island? by LordBhaal · · Score: 1

    Was it 7 weeks? I can't seem to find it again.

    Anyway, the point is that this is basically marketing, and designed to grab the USA public and make them watch advertisements.

    Something like this has been happening in Australia for a couple years, but much more serious. 2 people (usually a couple) were sent down to the back blocks of Tasmania for a year (yup, 1 whole year) with bugger all. No constant tv crews either.

    So it was real physical survival, whereas the TV show is about political surival. Guess most of us geeks miss out then. Still, they'll need people to 'die' early on, so don't give up now.

    1. Re:7 weeks on a tropical island? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Anyway, the point is that this is basically marketing, and designed to grab the USA public and make them watch advertisements.

      We've had this for a while, and so have you, no matter where you live. It's called "Television"

      The Good Reverend

  80. best strategy to win? by blue_adept · · Score: 1
    It seems the best strategy would be to remain popular (or at least innocuous) amoung all the other contestants, to decrease the likelihood of being voted 'off' the island.

    However, if island 'cliques' emerge, things could get interesting....for example, in-group agreements to support each other (ie, not vote each other out) could emerge. Groups could also collectively target a (possibly random) specific individual in some other group to be 'voted out', thereby preserving safety within the group.

    In that scenario, the largest clique wins, and then in-group battles would break out, possibly with the formation of sub-cliques, etc..

    What's also interesting is that the ultimate victor has to remain more popular with the last seven contestants than his rival. That's probably why the contest isn't open to CANADIANS! (we're too innocuous/friendly and we'd win every time).


    --

    "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
  81. Trying to out-do Swedes and Dutch? by Chilles · · Score: 1

    The swedish show was called expedition robinson as someone already pointed out earlier and it also was on a tropical island, the price there was a measly $50,000.-

    In holland (wich is where I happen to live) we are now enjoying a really fun show called (as pointed out) Big brother but their concept is a little different. It goes like this:
    Nine people live in a house without any connection to the outside world other than a voice over. no TV, no newspaper etc. They stay in that house (wich, by the way is a sort of pre-fab single story building) for 100 days.

    There are some fun elements added too:
    Every few weeks each of the inhabitants has to nominate two housemates for removal from the house. After that the viewers (that's us!) get to vote on the nominee's and the one with the most votes has to leave the (and spend the next few weeks in talk shows) and he or she gets nothing. In the end there will be three left and then the public votes for the most popular and that person gets $125,00.- and the other two get nothing. end of show.
    They get to spend $250.- every week (with nine people!) but they can raise their budget by succesfully completing assignments such as: cycling 1300km on a hometrainer in five days.

    Every day there is a "prime time" summary of all the fun things they did that day on TV and at night it (sometimes) replaces the shopping channel (wich is good). there are also four webcams running all day and night (remember the time-difference)

    http://www.big-brother.nl

    (Sorry, I'm no good at HTML)

  82. Subtext of cannibalism by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    How lame, it's nothing but a popularity contest, but with a sort of political backstabbing twist because there can only be one winner in the end. Like Highlander meets 90210.

    Of course, if you rework their premise, it makes perfect sense. Assume the castaways don't have enough food (and assume they're helpless morons, because they're on a tropical island). Each vote is to determine who is sacrificed to be eaten. Now that would be a show worth watching!

  83. South China Sea my @$$ by alumshubby · · Score: 4
    Oh, for Chrissakes...Guess where the #1 spot in the world is for getting robbed, raped, kidnapped and/or murdered with a 360-degree view of the ocean? Yep. South China Sea. The US Navy and others patrol to try to keep the pirate situation down to a low boil, but there's only so many ships, plenty of bad guys, and unless CBS is going to have its own private flotilla and Marine det providing security, Very Bad Things are liable to happen.

    You guys all read Snow Crash...you do remember those pirates, right?

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    1. Re:South China Sea my @$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember to suppress the gag reflex...

  84. Sounds destined to fail by DanMcS · · Score: 5

    The application alone seems designed to ensure that they all starve to death:

    Applications MUST be written clearly or typed and must be accompanied by a videotape which meets the following restrictions:
    CONTENT: Who you are and why you would make the ultimate Survivor! Be creative!

    So, to be on the show, you must be able to survive a screen test. Something tells me this one will be the most important test of a cantidate, but really, even if they look good on camera, how are they going to look after 5 1/2 weeks on a deserted island with no plumbing?

    Some of the other questions are amusing too. The answers most likely to ensure survival in a real marooning situation, are likewise those most likely to scare the producers and cause you not to be hired. Compare them with the typical angst-ridden teen applicant.

    In which other occupations, if any, have you been employed (please list your last three (3))?
    Tribesman Hunter, Gatherer, Flint knapper
    Teen McDonalds, lifeguard, Walmart

    What is your level of education and what school(s) did you attend?
    Tribesman None
    Teen I just graduated from SuperDuper High School in Podunk, Ohio (go Porcupines!)

    Name three of your favorite hobbies.
    Tribesman Making spears, burning out canoes, skinning game animals.
    Teen Going to movies, shopping, talking on the phone

    Not including your current place of residence, in which other cities and/or countries have you lived and for what period of time?
    Tribesman I have lived in Brazil, Australia, and the Congo at various times. Of course, the tribes didn't call them that...
    Teen I've never been outside of the three-state area.

    List three adjectives that best describe yourself:
    Tribesman Large, brutish, accurate (with projectiles)
    Teen Smart, sensitive, ambitious

    If you could hold any political office, what would it be and why?:
    Tribesman Someday, I would like to lead my own clan into the rainforest and never return.
    Teen I would be mayor, so I could beautify our city's streets and parks.

    What is the accomplishment you are most proud of?:
    Tribesman I killed my first wild boar when I was 10.
    Teen I won the spelling bee my senior year!

    Do you have any pets? If so, please list their name and type.:
    Tribesman Animals are for eating.
    Teen Poofy, my iguana.

    Are you a vegetarian or do you eat meat?:
    Tribesman See above.
    Teen It isn't right to eat animals, they are people too.

    What's your favorite movie?:
    Tribesman Alive.
    Teen Clueless

    What's your favorite music to listen to?:
    Tribesman The rythmic pounding of drums.
    Teen Ska

    Describe your perfect day.:
    Tribesman Waking at dawn, I rise and gather my hunting equipment. But I find that a deer has fallen into the pit I dug last week, so I bludgeon it and dress it to take back to camp, where I roast a haunch and smoke the rest to preserve it. No tigers attack me.
    Teen I get to sleep in till noon, then go and help my grandmother with her garden.

    Do you have any body art (piercing, tattoos, etc.)? If so, please describe.:
    Tribesman All men in my society have a 3 inch prong stuck through their lip after they make their first kill.
    Teen I have 8 ear piercings, a nosering, two eyebrow rings, and one other one, you don't want to see it.

    List three (3) items you would take with you to the Survivor! desert island, if allowed, and why?:
    Tribesman A knife, a lighter, and a tarp. That's all I own anyway.
    Teen A TV, stereo, and VCR so I wouldn't feel so far from home.

    What is your favorite topic of conversation at a dinner party?:
    Tribesman The upcoming rainy season, or the next expedition into town.
    Teen The terrible plight of the suburbs in this country, as they are doomed to fall behind when even more sprawl moves people out from the cities.

    What skills do you bring to the island that would make you a useful member of the group?
    Tribesman Given a rock, I can provide food for the entire group.
    Teen I am a good listener, a caring friend, and a swim instructor at my local pool.

    Why do you believe you could be the final Survivor? (please limit your answer to 3 or 4 sentences):
    Teen Because I believe in myself!
    Tribesman If I am not, I will call down my tribe's medicine man and your corporate headquarters will be left a smoldering ruin in our wake.

    Who do you think CBS will pick?

    --
    Communication is only possible between equals
  85. What if everyone else is dead? by SplasPood · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure of the law, but who controls this island as far as laws?

    1. Re:What if everyone else is dead? by alumshubby · · Score: 1
      Depends on where in the South China Sea we're talking about. PRC claims some islands, Vietnam claims some, Philippines claims some. Possibly Myanmar and Brunei each claim some. I think the Indonesians may claim a few too -- correct me there if not, guys -- and Singapore's pretty close, if that counts for anything.

      A bunch of these islands are perpetually disputed, which is part of why the place is so lawless (the other being that it's a hell of a big area to patrol). Frankly, some are basically controlled by whomever's closest with the most ordnance.

      Now that they've found oil in the Paracels and Spratlys, maybe our contestants could include a drilling-rig roughneck or two.

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  86. Guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, I don't know about you but any idiot can handle a gun just fine. Certainly more than 1% of the populace can. Give me a gun and I can most assuredly show you how it is used.

    1. Re:Guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can you show me how this gun works?"
      "Sure! Stand up against that wall...."

  87. Better yet... by knife_in_winter · · Score: 1

    One slight twist and this show could called "Predator".

    Here's how it works:

    A bunch of us pool our resources and money. After the show starts, we determine the exact location of the island.

    Then we hire one special forces operative, preferably an ex-SEAL with impulse control problems. He can be special contestant number 17!

    His job is to eliminate, with extreme prejudice, the contestants, the camera crew, the producers and any other humans on the island. And he gets to keep the grand prize for a job well done.

    Now *that's* entertainment.


    Nothing can possiblai go wrong. Er...possibly go wrong.
    Strange, that's the first thing that's ever gone wrong.

    --

    Tyler's words coming out of my mouth.
    1. Re:Better yet... by alumshubby · · Score: 1

      preferably an ex-SEAL with impulse control problems

      Beg pardon to quibble, but if he has impulse control problems, there ain't no way he got to be an ex-SEAL, because he wouldn't have gotten to be a SEAL in the first place. People with impulse-control problems simply cannot make it through BUD/S. The need for self-discipline is too great. If you don't believe me, hit the navyseals.com site and see for yourself.

      OTOH, SEALs are very, very good at following orders, taking initiative, and improvising along the way. If he's given the mission, I gaurantee all contestants etc. are gonna die. (In one of Neal Stephenson's novels where some civilian puke waxes an ex-SEAL -- underwater, yet! -- I just laughed like hell. Stephenson knows s**t about SEALs.)

      BTW, here's what I just flashed on for a game show...make it through the BUD/S program as a civilian and $1+e6 is yours! CBS' money would be pretty safe, damn betcha...

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    2. Re:Better yet... by GaspodeTheWonderDog · · Score: 1

      Don't think of it in *those* terms, think of it from ABC or NBC's perspective. This would be a great way for them to destroy CBS's show. They are technically out of US jurisdiction so they can do whatever they want. I'm all for live cluster bombing on tv. That would be the best! They just need to make sure this special operative also has one of those cool 'crazy guy' laughs that makes your spine chill. Yeah baby yeah... blow up the baby seals and make coral snake pit traps!

      --
      This space for sale
    3. Re:Better yet... by LordBhaal · · Score: 1

      The book was Zodiac.


      The SEAL didn't die because Sangamon killed him, he died because he lost his air hose in the fight with the corporate diver, and swallowed extremely toxic water.


      So, the SEAL kills the corporate diver, and the environment kills the SEAL. Now, just where did the civilian wax the SEAL again?


      Ok, so I just read that book.

    4. Re:Better yet... by alumshubby · · Score: 1
      I'll take your word for it, since it's been a year or two since I read it. I could've sworn Sangamon was the guy fighting the SEAL. Maybe he was just there observing the fight and I'm conflating characters. Also, I thought that Stephenson has the SEAL dying because he gets knifed, not merely because he loses an air hose in a fight. Sheesh, what a wussy way to kill off a warrior.

      But...again, the idea of a SEAL dying in a fight underwater just didn't ring true. If a "corporate diver" surprises SEAL, whom do you suppose is going to die in the ensuing fight? How likely do you think it is that a SEAL -- or anybody -- is going to swallow enough toxic water to kill him that quickly? Alternatively, that the water could be toxic enough in the first place that a mouthful could kill somebody within seconds? Or that a SEAL is even going to swallow seawater accidentally to start with? Remember, these guys spend more time training for CQB underwater than most infantry train for it on land. Hey, Neal, you reading this thread?

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    5. Re:Better yet... by knife_in_winter · · Score: 1

      Hey, quibble on!

      I know that SEAL's go through a *lot* of training and discipline. Heck, before a soldier even *gets* to SEAL training, he or she is among the best, sometimes already a special forces operative of one form or another. The whole program is designed to weed out not only the weak and unadaptive, but also the undisciplined yahoos with poor impulse control problems. So I totally believe you.

      My idea was that "contestant 17" is an ex-SEAL who has since developed poor impulse control problems due to years of intense psychological trauma caused by bad TV game shows. :)


      Nothing can possiblai go wrong. Er...possibly go wrong.
      Strange, that's the first thing that's ever gone wrong.

      --

      Tyler's words coming out of my mouth.
  88. How to win: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then, I guess the girl that puts out will have the best shot at the prize.

  89. No physical danger here, just hurt feelings. Eww. by SoilCreep · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read the description of this show? At first, I thought that people would be eliminated as they slowly starved, or became ill, or seriously injured themselves. Yay! However, they will be eliminated by a vote (after a public debate) involving everyone on the island. In other words, this will be like a long episode of The Real World that takes place on an island. Boo.

  90. The REAL question for you wannabe contestants is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What T-shirt will YOU wear?

    I'm torn between my:
    Netscape
    Unixware (obtained by appearing on a promo tape)
    FreeBSD (never worn, gift from client)
    or the League of Evil Geniuses (but at $30...I'd like to keep it)

    I'd prob. wear the FreeBSD shirt...just to upset the local Penguns.

    But face it, most of us would never make it past the screening and the physical.

  91. big brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the netherlands, a similar show is running right now. See www.big-brother.nl

  92. Wheel World by G27+Radio · · Score: 1
    It sounds stupid to me. Not half as interesting an idea as Wheel World. Lex and Terry (radio hosts) stick a bunch people in a in a Jacksonville trailer park for a couple weeks. I think it just started this week in fact. I think they might have a cam or something on lexandterry.com (Our proxy blocks their site so I can't be sure.) Judging by the applicants they interviewed on the radio it could turn out pretty funny, or maybe dangerous. Still more interesting than the Gilligan's Island meets Real World idea.

    numb

  93. Doom! Yes!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three things? a chainsaw, a shotgun (the double barreled one) and that lovely BFG9K... (I know that tke 9K uses lots of cells, still one shot should be enough... and it is GPL!) Deathmatch rules apply... that could be fun...

  94. Desolate Island Nuke tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Distant Island Nuke tests also don't help the appearance of people

  95. Re:Anybody read The Running Man? - Long walk by Paranoid+Diatribe · · Score: 1
    I agree. This was one of my favorite King stories ever. The rules of the Walk were so simple -- keep walking or you're toast. Truly a morbid King classic.

    I remember when I read (and then saw) Running Man, I told people we'd be seeing things like that. Most laughed. A few years later we had American Gladiators. Hmmm...

    Who says life doesn't imitate art?

  96. Gilligan's Island would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading the description of this show, I think I'd rather watch Gilligan's Island reruns. While not particularly smart, it was atleast funny. And heck, it had a great theme song:

    Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale, a tale of a fateful trip. That started from this tropic port, aboard this tiny ship. The mate was a mighty sailin' man, the skipper brave and sure. Five passengers set sail that day, for a three hour tour, a three hour tour. The weather started getting rough, the tiny ship was tossed. If not for the courage of the fearless crew, the Minnow would be lost; the Minnow would be lost. The ship set ground on the shore of this uncharted desert isle, with Gilligan, the Skipper too, the Millionaire, and his Wife, the Movie Star, and the rest, (the Professor and Mary Ann,) here on Gilligan's Isle.

    Now this is the tale of our castaways, they're here for a long long time. They'll have to make the best of things, it's an uphill climb. The first mate and his skipper too, will do their very best,to make the others comfortable, in their tropic island nest. No phones, no lights, no motor car, not a single luxury. Like Robinson Crusoe, it's primitive as can be. So join us here each week my friend, you're sure to get a smile. From seven stranded castaways, Here on Gilligan's Isle.

    This is a decent site:
    http://members.aol.com/SScastaway/Gilligans.html

  97. Influx of Brits??? by FatSean · · Score: 2

    no wonder my dental co-pays have been rising! hehehhe :P

    --
    Blar.
  98. A crummy little network?? by Foogle · · Score: 1
    Do you have any idea who owns MTV??? Jesus, they're NOT even close to being little.

    -----------

    "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    1. Re:A crummy little network?? by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      It's Viacom, for those of you who don't know. They're buying CBS. Guess they already talked Bunim Murray into making a show for 'em. :)

      Now, if only they could get the MTV animation ppl to make shows for CBS...

  99. Sorry - Sweden came before that! by Ratface · · Score: 1

    We're on the third series here in Sweden. First one began in 1997.

    ... and there was me thinking the US got all the good TV first.

    Actually it's a rilly good series. People have almost died on it! Unfortunately, people have also become local TV celebrities here from appearing on the program.

    So I guess in about 3 years time, /. will be announcing "The Search For The Desert Gold", which is the latest Robinson clone to have been dreamt up by Swedish TV.

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Sorry - Sweden came before that! by Windigo+The+Feral+(N · · Score: 2

      Ratface dun said:

      We're on the third series here in Sweden. First one began in 1997. ... and there was me thinking the US got all the good TV first.

      Actually, you'd prolly be shocked to see how many rather popular TV shows in America are direct ripoffs of European, British, or Japanese TV shows :) For example, "Ready, Set, Cook" (TV Food Network) is an Americanised version of the British "Ready, Steady, Cook"; the same network is apparently now showing an Americanised version of the Japanese show (and cult classic) "Iron Chefs" (imagine Ready, Steady, Cook on major crack :)... "Survivor" is apparently a ripoff of "Expedition Robinson" on Swedish and Swiss TV; even "America's Funniest Home Videos" is an Americanised version of a Japanese "funniest home videos" program (watch the credits for proof--that is, if you can stand more than five seconds of Bob Saget without bearing an amazing resemblance to someone who has just downed an entire bottle of syrup of ipecac).

      Seriously, though...I don't want to think of all the legal disclaimers contestants will have to sign (the US is decidedly more sue-happy than Europe is, has no legal caps on damages, and game shows HAVE been sued in past). If someone ends up dying or going seriously ill on the show, the lawyer packs are liable to be on them anyways...and I hope they're timing this fairly carefully to avoid hurricane season or areas known for tsunamis :) (Tsunamis wouldn't be a concern in the Carribean, where I expect they'd hold the contest--many cruise lines actually own private "vacation islands", and I imagine it'd be a similar setup--but if the contest lasts past June or so they ARE going to have to worry about hurricanes...)

      --
      -Windigo The Feral (NYAR!)
  100. Are you ready to be deceived? by Stonehead · · Score: 1

    As proved at the Dutch site Fokzine, people are mainly interested in what is not broadcasted. The nine people locked in the isolated house have been forced to sign a contract, that they can't sell their story to any other medium than Veronica, the company which broadcasts Big Brother now. Moreover, Veronica seems to realize that simply "watching people" is too boring, so there is probably a script involved. Even nicer to see is the way Veronica tries to hide this - at the moment something strange occurs, they simply pull the plug out of the studio - even the webcams are censored.

    The reactions are funnier than the program itself: a camera team from another TV station landed in the garden using parachutes, there would even have been a fight. And there's the Fish Brother parody, a webcam on nine goldfishes in a bowl, and you can vote them away..

  101. Re:Diversity Applicants required, ask non-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...open doors and chests

  102. PLUGOLA? by G+Andrews · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, how do we know the guy who sent this story in isn't some CBS shill who sent this message to Slashdot because series planners decided they needed some geeks on the show to appeal to the (18-49, male, white, RICH) geek audience? Does anyone other than me think Hemos and Taco and all should be more alert to marketing explotiation?

  103. Old idea, but it can be kind of interesting by NettRom · · Score: 1
    As several have pointed out already, the show is in its third season on Swedish television (SVT). The other Nordic countries have picked up the idea, so the Scandinavian channel called TV3 is running the show in Norway, Sweden & Denmark. Each country has its own contestants, host and is not shown in the other countries. They all use one or more islands in the south China sea, as far as I know.

    As far as I've been able to tell TV3 is using the same set of rules & ideas as SVT did the first year. Each program has one (or more) competitions, and the losing team has to vote on of their people out. He/she is sent home. Here in Norway there's two teams, each starting with 8 members (as far as I remember). It's mixed teams.

    The Swedes (SVT) are slightly more original this time around though. They have 4 teams, 2 male and 2 female. These teams are again split by age, so there's one "youngster" team and one "oldie" team. So far they haven't put the teams together though, so I don't know what'll happen once they have so few members that they need to combine the teams. In the previous season the teams were put together once they were down to 8 or so total.

    The show is quite similar to Road Rules, Real World, and other variations over the theme "Lets put some people together and film them 24/7 and see what happens". Robinson (or "Expedition Robinson" which it's also called) has a competitive nature though, something Road Rules & Real World didn't have (as far as I rememember, been a few years since I last saw them). In Robinson, there will be only one person left to pick up the first price.

    Due to the competition there's room for a lot of tactics. There's tactics regarding who you send home and who you don't. I remember in the final stages of the first season on SVT that when there were 3 people left, the winner of the competition got to choose who would be sent home. That's of course easy, you send home the one you think is your toughest competitor. When there's still teams competing you need to send home those who won't make your team win, of course. The team who wins the competitions get various kind of prizes (I've seen food, don't remember anything else).

    It's more or less a kind of soap opera. There's competition between people, people like each other, hate each other, argue, eat, sleep, et all... and the camera team follows them around all the time. The most exciting things probably end up being shown (we all remember the guy in Real World SF that got kicked out). The latest big story (/controversy) here in Norway regarding the show was that they showed some of the girls sunbathing with bare breasts, which the TV station had promised not to do. The girls that were shown half-naked are concerned about what will be shown in the later episodes though, since they used less & less clothes as time on the island progressed.

    But anyway... (I've been writing a few paragraphs now) The show is slightly interesting if you're into shows like that. I'm slightly disappointed by the Norwegian version of the series, but probably since it's such a copy of the previous Swedish season. The current Swedish show with males against females and oldies against youngsters is more interesting though. Mostly because the battle of the sexes have been going on for a while. :)

    It'll be interesting to see what kind of show CBS gets out of it. Hope I have CBS over here (or they stream it on the 'net) when it's done.

  104. Not Sweden - the Netherlands by Didian · · Score: 1

    Actually, the "Big Brother" show is shot in the Netherlands. They have a web site at:
    http://www.big-brother.nl/

    There's also an article about it at the Washington Post site (which is in English).
    http ://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-09 /25/094l-092599-idx.html

    The main difference seems to be that the group nominates the evictees, but the viewing public actually decides. Two are already gone. Out of the remaining eight, five will be booted before the new year. The remaining three get about $118,000US each.

    My favorite quote from the article:
    Their trips to the bathroom will be on camera in the control room for security reasons and to prevent secret meetings, but not broadcast. Nor will the fronts of showering ladies.

    --
    "You despise me, don't you?"
    "If I gave you any thought, I probably would."
  105. who needs morals when you got money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a question, mostly an unacknowledged one, since no one seems to care anymore.

    How moral is it to place 16 people on an island, place them in a situation where they will have to stab each other in the back, for money?

    Think about this. You are on an island, if you are lucky for 7 weeks. That whole time you could be removed for any reason. All human contact is in direct opposition with you and you are quit aware that when it comes time they will conspire against you, set you up, lie about you and then vote you of the island.

    Don't forget that you may also have to rely on them for your very substance.

    You will endure 7 weeks of constant torment, for $1,000,000.00 if you are lucky. Most likely you will get a nice parting gift( one year supply of Mac and Cheese ).

    I am sure the show will be a hit, and the break room subject will move from Buffy to this.

    papageorgio

  106. Mating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. if you were a woman would you let every male mate with you even if you risked getting pregnant? (I'm not sure if contraceptives are allowed. This way your odds would certainly increase. A male would not vote out a good hooker!)

    2. would you try to make a secret deal with everyone behind the producers' back about sharing the profit? (A certain 150k is better than a very uncertain 1000k)
  107. Re:Diversity Applicants required, ask non-american by drewpt · · Score: 1

    diverse

    Diversity? That's what America was built on.

  108. Someone needs to combine this with... by lordsutch · · Score: 3

    ABC's Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? The plot: 16 people stuck on an island, with Regis Philbin shouting "Is that your final answer?" at them repeatedly until all but one go insane.

    What do you think, America?

    --
    My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
  109. Rip off of Amsterdam show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a complete rip off of a show that is very popular in Amsterdam. There, they have a group of people in a warehouse, completely cut off from society and they vote a person out once a week. Figures that CBS can't think of anything original.

  110. Most likely person to be the last one there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Depending on the contestants, in my opinion, the most likely last contestant will be a woman.

    All she would have to do is sleep with the guys and that would guarantee that she would not be voted out most likely. Then all she has to do is get them to turn on each other one by one.

    Not trying to be sexist. Just knowing guys and guessing what the situation would be like.

    1. Re:Most likely person to be the last one there... by georgeha · · Score: 2

      Depending on the contestants, in my opinion, the most likely last contestant will be a woman.

      All she would have to do is sleep with the guys and that would guarantee that she would not be voted out most likely. Then all she has to do is get them to turn on each other one by one.


      Hey AC, let's do lunch sometime, and pitch this to the Spice Channel! Or maybe WB.

      George

  111. What's the game? by Urmane · · Score: 2
    Imagine that in March of 2000, you and fifteen other strangers are marooned on a deserted tropical island in the South China Sea, cruise missles sailing overhead.

    White sand beaches, lush rain forest, crystal clear waters. This is your new home for seven weeks. The only other inhabitants are long tailed Macaque monkeys, monitor lizards, and our crack team of TV cameramen, journalists, and Bob Eubanks! It seems romantic, but you are now part of a bold challenge where only one of you will win the ultimate prize of one million dollars.

    You will not bother with shelter - hey, it's the tropics - catch food (see aforementioned monkeys, lizards, and journalists), and establish a new island society. You must work together as a team, but only to lull your competitors into a false sense of security. Each day you will compete in challenges of strategy, guile and bludgeoning to steal your opponent's small luxuries and to preserve your chance for the ultimate cash prize.

    You will form a Tribal Council. Here you will openly debate the group dynamics of the previous days, and smash the skulls of those who disagree with you. The council ends with a secret ballot where each of you votes to eat the cameramen and take the prize-winning journalists as mate. The person with the least amount of mates must leave the territory immediately and is elimiated from the gene pool.

    Over the weeks, one by one, more are eliminated until only two remain. In order to choose the final winner, a unique Tribal Council is called. This final conflict (refereed by the last seven outcast males) will be a WCW Cage Match Battle Royale, with Jesse Ventura as Guest Announcer. Weeks of surviving the elements and outlasting the other castaways, but it all comes down to one - the Survivor! The winner of the $1,000,000 (less %38 federal tax, 10% millionaires tax, 3% state tax, all applicable license fees, insurances, and transportation fees. CBS owns all trademarks and distributions rights associated with this contest, including books and movie sales, as well as the Survivors persona and image without limit.)

    Do you want a chance to win ONE MILLION DOLLARS (see note above)? Do you have what it takes to be the ultimate Survivor(TM)? Click here for information on how to apply for this once in a lifetime opportunity to embarrass yourself in front of the whole world, live!

    --

    --
    "I find your lack of faith disturbing." -- Darth Vader
  112. Re:It all started in svt.se by OlJa · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the hompage for the original, Swedish version.

  113. This isn't survival in the wilderness, by Bwah · · Score: 1

    This is political survival. The winner will be a person who is a good manipulator and should be able to get elected to high office with no trouble whatsoever. Even get free exposure from CBS on the way.

    dv

    --
    "There's no secret. You just press the accelerator to the floor and keep turning left." -- Bill Vukovich
    1. Re:This isn't survival in the wilderness, by knuth · · Score: 1

      Really. Somehow this idea manages to be sleazy and boring at the same time.

      Sleazy because the contestants would do anything for a buck. And in particular, they're willing to stab other people in the back.

      Boring because it'd be like watching your high school student government. A good-looking "popular" political schemer will win. Probably an upper middle class white male.

      Must see TV? Only for morally bankrupt idiots who can't tune in to an exciting televised golf tournament or something.

  114. How to win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kiss ass until you get to the final two, then offer 4 of the 7 judges a cash incentive.

  115. Survivor Type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone read Stephen King's short story "Survivor Type" in Skeleton Crew? It's a story about a man who survives a plane crash and is stranded on a desert island with a few kilos of heroin. Now THAT's entertainment. Add a few more people... males and females ... leave them alone for a while come back and you'll see everyday chumps turn into cave warriors. Where men were men and women were sex toys. Everybody running around in loincloths (if not butt-ass naked) killing wildlife during the day and screwing the nearest female after dinner cuz there's no TV to watch. YEA Baby!

    1. Re:Survivor Type? by Darksky · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and since he is injured and can't get food he eats HIMSELF!

      --
      01101100 01101001 01101110 01110101 01111000 01110010 01110101 01101100 01100101 01110011
  116. ST:Voyager and Gilligan's Island. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
    Separated at birth ????

    You tell ME

    Apologies to Tom Smith, ESPECIALLY if I mis-quoted this:

    Just sit right back, and you'll hear a tale,
    Of a Federation Ship:
    The StarFleet sent it Voyaging, but it didn't send a script. . .
    The Mate was a surly Injun man:
    Ms. Skipper, not Picard
    And an Afro-American Vulcan, don't think about that to hard. . .
    Don't think about that to haarrrrrrrrrrd. . .

    A Tempero-Spatial Anomaly was broached in a state of Flux,
    Cut out the Treknobabble, and you'll find it really sucks. . .
    . . . but should make lots of bucks. . .


    et cetera ad nauseam. . .

  117. Its entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of watching mind numbing sitcoms I can see people fend for their lives like in prehistoric days. It would be an interesting experiment. Hehe, "MTV's Extreme Real World"

  118. you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some men are perfectly capable of sleeping with the woman and then voting her off the island immediately thereafter. The equivalent happens every day, right here in the real world.

    1. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your absolutely right, a man could do that.

      But why pitch her off the island if you have however many weeks left till the end by yourself?

      georgeha: lol. Actually, I was waiting to see if I could get it on Fox as, "When Good Tv Shows go Bad!"®

  119. Survivors is not a good name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voting the other players off the island? Gee, I see everyone voting to get rid of the person they think is going to win instead of the slackers. The winner will most likely be the one that is best at manipulating other people and not necessarily the best outdoor survivor. CBS should just donate the money to a homless shelter to benefit real survivors.

  120. Survival of the fitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm entered and am going to go buy some ammo! Last man standing eh?

    I like shooting people :)

    -paul

    1. Re:Survival of the fitist by Skott · · Score: 1

      Does anyone remember the movie "Running Man"? I guess reality is finally catching up with us. Skott

  121. ummmm palm trees ... by flanman · · Score: 1

    they got to eat palm trees???


    ummm....sign me up!

    I was bummer because they only allow Americans to enter...what about Canadians? Swedes? Finns?? Brits?? Aussies??

    I guess they know that we'd whip their asses.

    Girlies!

  122. Sadly, this will probably be a ratings cash-cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They Shoot Horses Don't THey? Anyone familliar with that film? It was an excellent film about the 1920's dance-a-thons where people literally danced for weeks straight just for a little cash. Many people died, the producers didn't give a crap. CBS is doing the same thing. tcd004 production manager of the flake tank

  123. Next fall on CBC! by jfunk · · Score: 2

    Watch men and women climbing ropes for big cash prizes and to avoid certain, agonizing death in...

    Climbing for Dollars!

    Thursdays at 9:00 after The Running Man!

  124. Balls Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You have a deserted island, 16 people, 7 weeks, and they have to fend for themselves, but the winner is determined by democracy??? How boring! I suggest that a special buzzer be placed at a specific spot on the island, and let the people stay there until they get bored, die, or hit the buzzer. Then the last one will get the million. Maybe some idiot will stay there for years just to get it. It would be an interesting expose' on the human drive for money as well as survival. How about a show called "What would you do for money?" where constestants would be asked to do outrageous things for a lot of money... example: "Sir, will you eat a shit burger for $10,000?" "Miss, will you jump from the second story of this building for $50,000? We provide all medical costs!"

  125. It's a simulation of cannibalism! by ariux · · Score: 1

    This isn't exactly a Robinson Crusoe-like survival contest. It's a simulation of cannibalism.

    Several people stranded together. At regular intervals, one of them must go; which one is decided by group will.

    The only part that doesn't fit is the last vote, where the ghosts of the eaten decide the fate of the survivors.

  126. Monitor lizards... by Pariah · · Score: 1

    Uh, I'm not sure choosing an island with Monitor lizards on it was such a good idea. They're very large, very dangerous. Even supposing the network has some staff waiting in the wings to save anyone who looks like they're going to die of starvation, exposure, or whatnot, a Monitor Lizard can kill someone quite rapidly... Every day that goes by makes me more glad I don't have a TV.

  127. Holmganga by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    I wonder if this island in a jurisdiction where Holmgang is legal?

    From The Nature of Warfare in Anglo-Saxon England:

    Hólmganga literally means 'island going' since duels were traditionally fought on islands. Saxo records a duel fought on an island in the River Eider by the fourth century Anglian king Offa which is also referred to in the Anglo-Saxon poem Widsið.

  128. Just a copy of Japanese TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had a show like this in Japan over a year ago where they sent 2 guys to an island to survive. They had to eat whatever they could and try to make a boat and escape. Looks like the US is just copying the Japanese this time!

  129. Impulse control probs by Jeos · · Score: 1

    Maybe he developed the impulse control problems when he was already an ex-SEAL?

  130. Hacking the competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you need to do is to find seven other participants willing to take a guaranteed $125K each and you can rig the whole thing (vote everyone else out, then bow out one by one, at the end split the $1M). It could end up more like Machiavelli (the game) than Robinson Crusoe.

  131. Whats with the age limit? by JediLuke · · Score: 1

    It says: Must be 21 years of age.

    What the hell is that about!?

    I bet i'd be a better candidate at 20 that any of the over 21 people they put on that island.

    . Each day you will compete in challenges of strategy, guile and wits to win small luxuries

    well since they have to be over 21 can anyone say...booze? once again...i can make my own cider...i think i would be a good candidate!

    . The person with the most votes against him/her must leave the island immediately and is eliminated from the contest.

    ok let me take the time to say that this is outright lameness. this is called survivor right? Make them battle to the death! but honestly, they should make people give up not be forced off...this is better because then people who like that character will think they are a wuss instead of them being bullied off. Make them vote to knock them out of their "office", whatever office you can hold on a dessert island.

    , more are eliminated until only two remain. In order to choose the final winner, a unique Tribal Council is called. This final council (consisting of the last seven eliminated contestants) will stand in judgment of the remaining two.

    oh man this is really wrong...once again...the only judge in a survival situation is nature...not a tribunal of past contestants...what crap.

    so basically this is going to be "the REAL WORLD: stranded in paradise" where a bunch of beautiful people jump around all day and look pretty.
    JediLuke

    --

    JediLuke
    -Do or Do Not, There is no Try
  132. diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard of garbage dumps built on bedrock too...

  133. Dumb idea but... by Jeos · · Score: 1

    I've read a lot of the messages on this and I have to say 2 things.


    1) Yes this is kind of a a dumb idea, mostly beacuse this has absoultly nothing to do with surviving and therefore the name of the show makes no sense.


    2) It would however be very difficult to win this thing. It is not just about being popular. I think to win this you would have to accomplish two things. First you would have to have the others like you, and come off as a nice/fair person. Second you would have to make people think (for whatever reason) that you have little chance of winning.
    I think the best way to do this would be nice to everyone and have them like you, but don't be the dominant person in the group. Then near the end become more dominant, and at the same time attempt to bring down the person you see as #1. However you would have to do this in a certain way so the other person looks bad, but you still come off looking like the good guy (so you can win the final vote).
    Throughout the whole contest a good idea would be to become friends with everyone, and make them think that you like them best.


    Something that came up in a few threads that I agree with, is that you would have to be very good at manipulating people. But while 'popular' people are generally good at manipulating people, I don't think they would win because people would see them as having a good chance to win, and therefore target them early on.

    So while this contest has nothing to do with survival and in some ways is stupid, I think it would be interesting to see who won and more importantly how they did it. Although I think if I was there I'd go with the split the money approach.

  134. Let's Analyze This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're selected to participate, you
    have a 1 in 16 chance of winning $1 million,
    if the winner were selected at random.
    That means your "expected" winnings are $62.5K
    for 7 weeks of admittedly difficult work that
    would be your entire life for 7 weeks.
    If we convert that to an equivalent salaried
    job, participating in this show is the equivalent
    of spending 7 weeks working 24 hours a day (with paid overtime)
    on a salaried job with a rate of $111K per year.
    So financially, you could "expect" to make decent money for doing
    this show, although it's risky money. For the
    $111K job, you would know you are making that money, whereas
    for the Survivor you could end up empty-handed or do much
    better than expected. The show also has some elements
    of danger that the typical $111K job doesn't.

    However, all that doesn't consider the fame and publicity aspects
    of being on the show. Anyone who participates
    on that show should be a little more marketable for
    any job they want to go for, or whatever. And the winner
    can probably expect to hit the talk show circuit, and
    do endorsements and all that stuff. So, if you don't
    get bitten by a coral snake while you're on the island,
    you can expect all sorts of crazy stuff to happen due
    to the 15 minutes of fame the show would give you.

    But then there's the training time involved. Certainly
    you would want to study and train before the show to
    have the best chance of winning the money. If you don't,
    the other participants will, and they'll win the money.
    So the training would be an additional time investment, although
    a lot of the physical and mental exercise would probably be good
    anyway. Then, there's the strategy involved in actually getting the
    others to choose you to receive the money. You might have
    to promise them a cut of your winnings, or promise to donate
    it to charity. Since the teammates doing the choosing have
    lost the money anyway and their choice for the money will be
    publicized, they should have no problem giving the money to
    you to donate to a charity, rather than give it to the other
    person who will go back to a cushy job, the talk show circuit,
    and major advertising endorsements anyway. In that case,
    it could become a battle of the charities, with each participant
    having their own charity to donate the money to.

    It seems like there are several things that would help you
    win:
    1. Know a lot that will help everyone to survive in comfort, and
    take on plenty of the workload. This way, you will be considered
    invaluable on the team, and last until near the end of the show.
    It would be helpful to become the leader, but maybe not necessary.
    2. Serve everyone on the team all the time, so that when push comes
    to shove, people would rather vote themselves out than you.
    3. Publicize the charity or giving everyone a cut idea for the
    winnings early on, which will increase your "deserving" of
    the money.

    Well, what do you think? Would CBS choose
    someone who plans on donating the money to
    charity? Maybe they would have to keep their
    true intention secret until they actually
    got on the island. Would that person survive to the
    end anyway? Would there be a bidding war
    at the end?

    rbrewer+slash@op.net

  135. Almost all of you are missing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This had nothing to do with physical survival -- it's about ``surviving'' the stupid secret ballots -- hell, the might as well do that in some apartment complex in suburbia!

  136. This is the most retarded idea I have ever heard!! by Rogain · · Score: 1

    I'd rather watch a show about monkey's picking lice and ticks off each other. Anyone who watches this survivor show should be killed, so should people who watch wrestling, QVC or the 700Club.

    --
    The current Slashdot moderation system is made by gay communists!
  137. I'm applying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the Net. I need a vacation and it sounds like great fun. One for Philly

  138. What is this probably going to be like by athmanb · · Score: 1

    A show like that one is currently running on swiss TV. A number of people selected mainly for their sex (50:50) and apparently not much tested for both social capabilities and knowledge about wilderness has been cast to a secluded island about a month ago, where they need to survive for up to 7 weeks. The only supply they get delivered is just enough rice to make sure they don't starve. There is therefore a big motivation to hunt/fish and forage for other food to fill and enrich their menus. The show has until now been quite fun to watch since they need to innovate fairly often to be able to find food, build houses etc. (just one of these challenges: how does one get to the coconuts hanging some 10 meters above you on a nearly perfectly smooth palm tree, no problem for people living e.g. in the Sahara but for europeans?). The show gives also quite some insights into the life in a stone-age society. Living from mostly the same food (be it rice like in Asia or Corn in America) with few diversities, working with crude tools in an effort to produce a little of luxury goods (even a good fish belongs to that or a stable hut protecting you from the weather). Quite a few of these people apparently misjudged the idea of getting a few weeks of free R&R on an island (together with a lot of /. readers) and were quite shocked when they understood the reality of living in such a way. Anyway, I like the show and I'm sure most of you are also going to appreciate it, be it just for entertainment or for sociological/ethological studies (which it is quite good for...)

  139. Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strix Television is producing the show for TV3 Denmark, TV3 Norway og SVT in Sweden. But the Concept was developed by the British company "Planet 24" http://www.mtg.se/eng/press/980401strix_eng.htm

  140. The likely american reaction to this show: by grappler · · Score: 2

    I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!

    Get up! Get your lazy ass out of your chair, open your window, and shout it: I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore! I can't hear you. Come on, get up. GET UP RIGHT NOW. Go to your god-fearin congressman, and tell him in no uncertain terms: "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!"

    Say it with me one more time...

    --
    grappler

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  141. Monitor lizards? Coral snakes? by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    I like the fact that these people will be on an island with at least two species of unbelievably deadly reptiles. Monitor lizards will tear you apart if they're hungry and see you, and a coral snake's poison will kill you inside of thirty seconds. People are dumb.

    Say, maybe this is all an attempt by CBS to thin out the gene pool! I like it!

    --- Dirtside

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  142. Re:Trying to out-do the Swedes? or the Danes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A total waste of time, if you want a real survival course - be all you can be.

    Yep... Take orders, scream at your underlings and shoot at the funny people with the towels on their heads.

    Be all you can be indeed.

  143. Alternatives (was: Re:It all started in Sweden...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you call it "Expedition Amundsen" and put the contestants on Spitzbergen. Polar-bear-grade shotguns are optional. Of course, here in Sweden we can call it "Expedition Andree", and the 'merkins can use "Expedition Scott".