Slashdot Mirror


New Mozilla, Corel, and Napster Releases

Everybody and his sister seems to have submitted at least one of these links: First, Mozilla build M11 is out. Go for it! Check this Mozilla.org page for details. Second, there's a Linux port out for Napster. We already mentioned it earlier here, but apparently a lot of people missed the reference. Go get it already. And third, Corel Linux is now available - if you can handle a 311 MB. If you can't burn a CD, compile your kernel with loopback support and try 'mount -t iso9660 -o loop 6.1-i386.iso /mnt/cdrom'

207 comments

  1. Anyone tried Corel Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anybody tried the new Corel Linux suite? I'm interested whether it installs nicely, and what you opinion is about the specific programs Corel created, such as that new filemanager.

    1. Re:Anyone tried Corel Linux by brthrjon · · Score: 1

      I couldn't even get the install to work. Burned the cd, made the floppy, booted, got a message about starting graphical install, saw an extremly low res X server start, went back to command line and then it reboots and repeats. I've tried on three different machines.

    2. Re:Anyone tried Corel Linux by Vagary · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem and there doesn't appear to be any meaningful tech support options on Corel's site. How many other people are having the same problem? Maybe we should try and figure out if there's any hardware similarities and help Corel out...

  2. loopback by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

    Need CDR? Nah just mount it on the loopback device surely

    1. Re:loopback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      AFAICT, there is no boot disk, so you have to actually put it in the CD drive so that you can boot to it (which you can't with a loopback.) ~luge

    2. Re:loopback by orcrist · · Score: 1

      But is it possible to put the loopback on a file-server and boot from the network?

      Chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    3. Re:loopback by orignal · · Score: 1
      It works with SuSE...

      M.

    4. Re:loopback by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

      When you download it the website has instructions for boot disk generation... Just need to hack the boot disk to mount partition with the iso on it, then mount the iso loopback

  3. Go mozilla! by rde · · Score: 1

    I was impressed with M10, and if M11 shows as much improvement as did previous milestones, I reckon I've found a new permanent browser.
    Yeah, it crashes. It's still buggy. But if I'm going to use software that crashes all the time, I reckon I might as well do so while serving the public.
    Is this another anti-netscape post? I prefer to think of it as a pro-mozilla post.

    1. Re:Go mozilla! by sterno · · Score: 2
      The new release seems to work better than M10, but it is still buggy and it crashed after about 5 minutes of use (which is the longest I've managed so far). I was happy to see that I could compose a message and send it without anything horrible happening :).

      Good work mozilla team! Keep it up and you may run the world yet! :)

      ---

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    2. Re:Go mozilla! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      It still is somewhat slow but that is to be expected until they are done fixing bugs and implementing everything. It does look really nice and the pages seem to be getting layed out correctly. Much improvement in menus and dialogs has been done. Still crashes or acts weird on almost all forms I tried. I am anxious to see the finish product given how good it is already looking (and it's pre-alpha still!) - who said Mozilla was dead? Myself I'm waiting for Jabber to hit the streets and then see file trading become semi-automated. At least until everyone has more bandwidth I see MP3's being traded like trading cards rather than just given away in mass. Who knows, maybe DVD rips too. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:Go mozilla! by Zoltar · · Score: 2

      Mine (M11) seems to load the pages pretty quick, but I got 3 Dr. Watsons in about 10 minutes. Ahhh.. the joys of alpha software. My biggest beef is the "My Panels" box which seems to come up by defailt. First, how do I kill it? I want it gone, dead...bye bye. I don't want to slide it over to the left, I want it gone gone gone.


      Second, why does this "real estate hogging intrusion of my space" come up by default? (Insert-> I'm turning into an old fart disclaimer) Whatever happened to designing a clean interface??? Why why why can't you give me a nice clean interface. I just wanna plug in a url and go to a website. I just want a nice big box for that page to load up in. I don't want panels, I don't want channels, (Insert-> cryptic Dr. Seuss reference for other old farts) I don't want green eggs and ham. Can somebody, for the love of God please help me.

      Otherwise it is starting to look pretty good :)

    4. Re:Go mozilla! by Samhain · · Score: 1

      So far I have been using it on Windows NT for about an hour with no crashes and no Dr. Watsons. I have been to about 7 sites with only the one homepage talked about above having problems with drawing the tables (I think the order in which he draws the tables is the problem their). I would say it is very usable. My only problem has been that it seems to keep losing my slashdot preferences! And the preview for this comment showed me that it was not accepting my paragraphs and running everything together. It is coming along.

    5. Re:Go mozilla! by EmilyColier · · Score: 1
      You guys should also look into Arachne. It's supposed to be available for Linux sometime next month. The DOS version kicks ass, can't wait till I can use it on Linux. It is a very good browser. Fast, stable, html4.0, etc. Also has plugin support with plugins for many types. When it comes to HTML, it's as good as Netscape.

      http://home.arachne.cz/

  4. I'm using M11 now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's looking very very good.

    1. Re:I'm using M11 now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know... I just downloaded it. At least on windows, I open it, it loads the mozilla.org page, and then the gui freezes and stops painting, and I have to ctrl-c from the console to exit the program.

  5. Not for everyone... by -brazil- · · Score: 1

    Before you start downloading, consider your libraries: everyone with glibc older than 2.1 (or libc5!) is shut out for the moment, due to a bug in the libraries. BWAAAHAAAA! I wanna Mozilla, too!

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

    1. Re:Not for everyone... by rde · · Score: 1

      Before you start downloading, consider your libraries
      He's having a go at the libraries now!

  6. Kudos to Corel, but where are the mirrors? by Hanno · · Score: 1

    ...for following the other distributors' example and putting a free (this time free as in free beer) version of their Linux distribution online for download. I'll try it out as soon as I see a mirror within the German universities' backbone.

    ------------------

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
    1. Re:Kudos to Corel, but where are the mirrors? by frank249 · · Score: 1

      Mirrors at CNET and TUCOWS

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    2. Re:Kudos to Corel, but where are the mirrors? by Hanno · · Score: 1

      Thanks but...

      CNET: One ftp site so far.

      Tucows: One ftp site so far.

      Well...

      ------------------

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    3. Re:Kudos to Corel, but where are the mirrors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tucows is a network of mirrors, actually. There's a tucows mirror in most european union states.

    4. Re:Kudos to Corel, but where are the mirrors? by Hanno · · Score: 1

      And I checked the European Linuxberg/Tucows mirrors and they don't carry the image file, in fact, the two German universities' backbone Linuxberg mirrors don't seem to carry any files, only the file list.

      See my point? :-(

      ------------------

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    5. Re:Kudos to Corel, but where are the mirrors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can find the image (and other distribs' image) at ftp.kando.hu.

  7. You can mount the ISO file and install by frank249 · · Score: 2

    You do not need the CD-R if you are already running Linux. Use the o loop command. One of you techies can post the proper syntax. It was on a previous discussion. Intial comments is that it is not bad but can use improvement. For a version 1.0 I guess it is ok. Dont complain about what they left out as you can use 'update - aks Corel package manager' to download everything else you need. Cheers

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    1. Re:You can mount the ISO file and install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      As root:

      losetup /dev/loop0 image
      mount -t iso9660 /dev/loop0 /mnt/something

      ... use it ...

      umount /mnt/something
      losetup -d /dev/loop0

    2. Re:You can mount the ISO file and install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a recent mount, I believe you don't even have to muck with losetup?
      mount -t iso9660 -o loop=/dev/loop0 /tmp/corel_r0qs.iso /mnt
      ... use it ...
      umount /mnt

    3. Re:You can mount the ISO file and install by Dicky · · Score: 2
      mount -o loop <imagename> <mountpoint> has always worked for me - I've never needed to use the losetup command. As ever, YMMV.

      Had a brief look at it this morning (GMT). It's pretty slick, but I think the install is too simple. It leaves out things which I think should be available.

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
    4. Re:You can mount the ISO file and install by Robert+Bowles · · Score: 2

      Or, if you don't want to worry about loop-device allocation:
      mount -t iso9660 -o loop [file] [mnt-pnt]

      You might also want to avoid mounting on '/mnt', as subdirs (such as '/mnt/floppy') are used by many distros.

      --
      /* MAGIC THEATRE
      ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
      MADMEN ONLY */
  8. So close... by smileyy · · Score: 1

    Each mozilla release is more painful than the last. What I mean is that each one gets that much closer to being usable for my everyday browsing and e-mail/news needs. So close, I can almost taste it.

    --
    pooptruck
    1. Re:So close... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2
      I know what you mean. I've been running the 11-12 Win32 nightly for the last few days and it's really impressive. I'm downloading M11 right now (damn slooooow dialup!) and can hardly wait to check it out.

      Zontar The Mindless,

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  9. Whoa... by theSheep · · Score: 0

    Is this ISO file a sort of "copy protection" scheme (yes I know it's legal to copy, but they can still try to get in your way) to make it more attractive to buy the CD? If so, is this legal with the GPL? I don't want to scream "foul play" but it looks fishy...

    --
    -- The Sheep --
    1. Re:Whoa... by Ice+Tiger · · Score: 1

      I think an ISO file is much better as it is one file to DL and you can cut straight to a CD or use loopback.

      --
      "Because we are not employing at entry level, offshoring will kill our industry stone dead."
    2. Re:Whoa... by benmhall · · Score: 1

      The source is there too.


      It's just buried throughout the the FTP server.

    3. Re:Whoa... by jbrw · · Score: 1

      There Linux OS page links directly to this ftp site.

      I can't, however, actually get on and have a look as their ftp server is maxed out at the moment.

  10. mozilla release in response to slashdot article?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this new mozilla release in response to the slashdot article on linux browser wars? Of course.. It eplains everything about slashdot and their affiliations with Mozilla... 8-)

    [1st!]

  11. Mounting diskimages by cloudmaster · · Score: 1
    And third, Corel Linux is now available - if you can handle a 311 MB download and if you have a CD-R drive available, because this is an ISO file that can't be installed directly. Happy downloading!

    mount newCDimage /mnt -t iso9660 -o loop

    Works on *my* linux box. :)

  12. Could Some one mirror.... by Myddrin · · Score: 1

    Could some one give me a http mirror for Win32 mozilla? My firewall doesn't allow ftp.

    Thanks

    --
    Myddrin
    1. Re:Could Some one mirror.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to try passiv(PASV) transfers... Check into you FTP client to see if it's supported (should be). Jeff Roberts (optik9@hotmail.com) [http://poetry.w3.to] (Don't touch me there!)

  13. opening isos under win32 or mac by DaveKempe · · Score: 1

    A link i have found useful is this one.
    It is very helpful to be able to opne that iso under win32.
    Winimage is one way to do that.
    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/gvollan t/winimage.htm

    Then you can extract all the files out and being an alternative install. Not that i know that you can do an ftp install for Corel Linux.
    Does ne1 have a link or 2 to the reviews of Corel Linux?

  14. Hold on a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    The release notes say:
    • On Linux systems that use glibc 2.0 (such as RedHat 5.2), there are problems with dl functions (dlopen(), dlsym()) not being thread safe. This might cause your M11 build to randomly crash at startup. If this happens to you, try running the application a few more times. The bits posted on ftp.mozilla.org are built on RedHat 6.0, which uses glibc 2.1 and does not have this problem. For more details, see bug 8849.
    Which sounds to me like it might work. I'm trying it out anyway
    1. Re:Hold on a second... by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
      If you have a couple of hundred megs free disk space, just go ahead-compile-smile. I've compiled M6-9 on libc5 and M9-10 on glibc2.0 (same machine, upgraded libc on Slack 3.5 manually) and Mozilla works just fine. Perhaps less stable than glibc2.1, but enough to get an impression of the progress and fast rendering.

      The random crashes on startup do occur, but rm -rf ~/.mozilla/ resolves everything. Not a big problem for alpha software (although, the precompiled M11 ran great under NT at school, beta quality is not far away anymore).

    2. Re:Hold on a second... by EmilyColier · · Score: 1

      I've tried to compile mozilla with over 800 megs free. After several hours of compiling, I'm down to around 150 and it's still not done. How much space does this thing require? The binaries crash on startup.

  15. Dumb Mozilla Question by The+G · · Score: 1

    I'm a Netscape user (Linux) and am interested in Mozilla. I'm just baffled by one thing --

    What the heck is a Profile?

    Are profiles user-specific? Non user-specific? A species of rare tropical bird? All sorts of stuff says "thus and such profile bug/feature exists" but none seems to say, "hey, you moron, a profile is an endangered species of fungus native to northern Tasmania" (or whatever a profile is).

    Moron as always,
    --G

    1. Re:Dumb Mozilla Question by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      In Windows Netscape a profile is basically the same as the linux .rc files and associated user independent information. Windows doesn't really tell programs what user you are, nor does it have a home directory for storing program configurations for each user (it sorta does, but there is no standard for third party programs of where to put configurations) Anyways in netscape for windows, if you have multiple users, when you run it, it ask you what profile you want to use. (Basically who you are? sorta...)
      Anyways profiles are just specific configurations for each user, such as your email information and display settings for Netscape/Mozilla.

    2. Re:Dumb Mozilla Question by Klaas · · Score: 1

      I was reading the Netscape docs the other day to figure out how to get rid of unwanted profiles and there was a definition of profiles, which says the same stuff as the other two responses, about how it allows multi-user etc...
      the thing is, those docs said that the Unix versions of Netscape do not contain the profile feature, and if you want to make a different user profile, you should create a new user account. That seems like the logical way to do it, since the profile is basically a replacement for the multi-user concept that is fundamentally built in to Unix and completely absent (well, sometimes superficially present) from Windows and Mac.

      So I would think this would not be a feature Mozilla would want to include in their Linux version, because apparently it is introducing bugs, and it's redundant with (and worse than) the normal Linux multi-user system.

      Of course, it's possible that they are just including it because it doesn't fit their development model right now to be doing different things for different OSes.
      I noticed a post above complaining about the continued inclusion of email and editor features. Perhaps once this thing is done, someone will take the time (maybe not too tough, and maybe already the plan) to go through the code and chop out all the extra stuff like mail and composer and profiles and make a nice sleek browser. I'm afraid my hacking skills are not adequate, but the person who did such a thing would certainly earn my admiration.

    3. Re:Dumb Mozilla Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Perhaps once this thing
      is done, someone will take the time (maybe not too tough, and maybe already the plan) to go through the code and chop
      out all the extra stuff like mail and composer and profiles ...

      ********************************************

      Most, if not all, of this can be done with the configure script I do believe...

  16. Re:mozilla release in response to slashdot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, no.. It's the M11 release which was planned a year ago.

  17. Napster Security? by LazloTheDog · · Score: 2

    This Napster thing looks kinda neat, but I would be a bit worried about giving the world access to my disk. The site is a bit sketchy on the details.

    JM

    --
    Oink, Oink!!
    1. Re:Napster Security? by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      It is a little unsettling isn't it? Some buddies at the computer lab were using it and I thought,"What a great idea, let the world know about your copyright infringements and view your hard drive at the same time." The windows version allows you to specify what folders you can allow access to. I can't wait to get ahold of the Linux port when I get home, but I would like assurance I can set the folder/whatever I share to be read only.

      Also a tip for new modem users of this. If you set your bandwidth to 14.4 it won't affect your D/L speed, but folks will definately look for faster sites with the same files before D/L'ing yours...Also set one folder with like 2-3 mp3's so that folks won't see your secret stash. I know it's cruel/lame whatever, but so is having to use the phone and cutting them off mid-download.


      mcrandello@my-deja.com
      rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

    2. Re:Napster Security? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2
      This Napster thing looks kinda neat, but I would be a bit worried about giving the world access to my disk.

      Indeed. Given the track record of things like the Windows ICQ client and the RealPlayer, you should be cautious about downloading the latest and greatest binary-only client for some closed protocol.

      You could probably run the client chroot()ed to a directory containing only MP3s, and as the user nobody. FreeBSD 4.0 (which AFAIK is a development version) has a jail() system call which might be appropriate.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Napster Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How long do you think it will be until someone creates an opensource version of napster that either uses the napster protocol or someone develops their own?

      HINT: DEVELOPERS WE NEED YOU!

  18. Calling (GP)L experts... by PigleT · · Score: 4

    This looks worrying. Of course, folks have already posted about local loopback devices for avoiding having to burn a CD, but what worries me is the end-user license agreement.

    In particular, note these extracts:
    1. Corel LINUX is a modular operating system made up of individual software components that were created by various individuals and entities ("Software Programs"). Many of the Software Programs included in Corel LINUX are distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License ("GPL") and other similar license agreements which permit You to copy, modify and redistribute the Software Programs

    So that's the definition of a "Software Program". Now what about:

    B. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS:
    All right, title and interest in the Software Programs, including source code, documentation, appearance, structure and organization, are held by Corel Corporation, Corel Corporation Limited, and others and are protected by copyright and other laws.


    Is that actually in keeping with the GPL?

    On a totally separate thread, does anyone know what the equivalent mechanism to 'apt-get dist-upgrade' is going to be, in particular, how the currently-in-development distribution is going to be mirrored, etc? Or is it all going to be relatively "stuck" stationary like RedHat / SuSE etc? (I mean, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 is very discrete. The above apt command isn't as discrete at all.)

    --
    ~Tim
    --
    .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
    Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
    1. Re:Calling (GP)L experts... by Xkill_ · · Score: 2

      ..."Corel Corporation, Corel Corporation Limited, and others"... I suppose this reference to "others" is a reference to all the open source software developers. It would be kinda nice if instead of them referencing "others" they referenced another document which listed the particular names of each developer and the associated program. hmmm, does freshmeat keep such a list? if so Corel could reference this other list in their license.

      "The importance of using technology in the right way has never been more clear."

      --

    2. Re:Calling (GP)L experts... by Zambies · · Score: 1

      I've been using it pretty much consistently since I was able to nab it Monday night. For a 1.0 release I'm very happy with it. The install is ludicrously easy to do, but you don't have the control over some things (X-Windows setup and networking), but the install seems to do a good job of getting it working somewhat close to my real needs. As far as apt-get, you can still use it, and they also included a graphical frontend that works great. You can specify mirrors other than Corel's web site. I've got a couple of Debian/Potato mirrors in my list, and it all works and updates perfectly.

    3. Re:Calling (GP)L experts... by Chilli · · Score: 2
      I don't see an problems with the PROPRIETARY RIGHTS section. The important point of the GPL when compared to public domain software is that the authors do not give up their copyright. They keep it, but grant everybody who receives the software the well-known freedoms. This is what GNU calls copyleft - copyright, but used the other way around.

      This mechanism is very important to be able to legally ensure that nobody misuses GPLed code.

      Chilli

      --
      -=- Just a random lambda hacker
    4. Re:Calling (GP)L experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this would matter IF the GPL had any legal backing...

    5. Re:Calling (GP)L experts... by PigleT · · Score: 1

      Cool.

      Thanks folks, I'm in the middle of downloading it now and will see what I think of it :)

      (I wonder if I really have turned into a Debian freak in recent months... ;)

      --
      ~Tim
      --
      .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
      Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
    6. Re:Calling (GP)L experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errrmm.. its supported by law as much as any other contract that hasn't actually been subject to a court action.

      If you're ruling out anything that hasn't needed a court to enforce then most contracts don't have any "legal backing", and none has prior to the court decision that did enforce them.

      What exactly is your point?

  19. Mozilla looking good.. by tuffy · · Score: 2
    There's still a number of glitches, especially in the redraw department, but it's now looking quite nice overall. Rather futuristic, actually. When it's finished I'm certain it will replace Netscape on my own machine.

    However, it's still heavy in the bloat department like it's predecessor :\ I don't wanta mail reader in my web browser, or a web page editor, or anything else but a web browser. If the source is open enough, perhaps those "features" can be excised and save me precious hard drive space and RAM.

    Just my first impressions..being posted from Mozilla itself.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    1. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      I've been getting the nightly builds for the
      last week or so, and it looks amazing. The only
      problem I have with it now is the fact that you
      can't link mime types to launch applications
      yet. So, for my streaming MP3 addiction I still
      have to use Netscape, but for everything else
      I've been using Mozilla. It's really quite
      stable and looks SO much better than Netscape.
      I love the blue/grey theme.

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by Matts · · Score: 2

      I don't want a mail reader in my web browser, or a web page editor, or anything else but a web browser.

      And that's exactly what you get. Read the interviews off mozillazine.org and you'll discover that the editor and mail/news are simply XUL and XPCom layers that are dynamically loaded as and when needed. If somebody wanted to they could easily ship this browser without those features at all - simply modify the XUL files to have no "mail" button and remove the dso from the download.

      Having said all that - currently I find Mozilla slow. Real slow. Try it on a slower machine (133Mhz +64Mb ram machine here) and it's unbearable. I know they'll improve this - I just hope it's enough.

      --

      Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    3. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having said all that - currently I find Mozilla slow. Real slow. Try it on a slower machine (133Mhz +64Mb ram machine here) and it's unbearable. I know they'll improve this - I just hope it's enough.

      I compiled from sources using --enable-optimize and --disable-debug yesterday, and it was very speedy after that. Of course, you're then useless to the project, but oh well.

    4. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by Topar · · Score: 2

      Having said all that - currently I find Mozilla slow. Real slow.

      There are currently some major performance issues that are being working on. They will be fixed before final release. One of the biggest is this bug here. If you want a faster and more responsive browser whilst downloading pages, go and vote for this bug now.

    5. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by luge · · Score: 1

      Really? I'm using it right now on a P200/32meg RAM, and it is quite usable. Not quite as nice as on my other box (PIII450/256meg) but still pretty usable. I'm sure when debug is off and optimization is on, it'll be quite usable.
      ~luge

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

    6. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by nufan · · Score: 1

      In that case, run viewer rather than apprunner.

    7. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by Matts · · Score: 2

      I disagree that this bug is the major cause of the slowdown though (and it appears some netscapers do too).

      I think it goes deeper than that. My thoughts are that it has to do with the UI marshalling code, but I really don't know enough about it.

      --

      Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    8. Re:Mozilla looking good.. by crisco · · Score: 1
      How about a P90? Dead dog slow here. I couldn't even brag about posting with it, it got too frustrating.

      However, I'm gonna put some action behind my complaints. Looks like this will have to be my next bugzilla mission, helping out with the speed. It should blaze on a P90 so that those poor souls with 486's can browse decently.

      --

      Bleh!

  20. Biggest problems with Mozilla by Topar · · Score: 2

    You don't need to be a developer to make a contribution to the Mozilla project! You can see the list of bugs most voted for her e. If you want to help the developers know which bugs you most want fixed, choose a bug or two from this list or another Bugzilla list and go vote for it!

  21. I'm impresed with M11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M11, can we say cool. It still has a few minor glitches, but damn, I can't wait for this final to be released.

    1. Re:I'm impresed with M11 by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1

      I'm not as impressed with M11 as I was with a nightly build I downloaded a couple of days ago. M11 crashes more often and it crashes harder, sprawling itself all over Windows, even corruping the display as it dies.

      Also, it's much slower than recent nightly builds. I think it's just extra debug stuff, so that people reporting errors will be able to give more information, but I dunno.

  22. The ISO file... by infodragon · · Score: 1

    One of the best features of Linux is the ablility to mount a ISO file as a file system using the loopback device kenel option. An example would be mount /tmp/file.iso /mnt/mount_dir -t iso9660 -o loop=/dev/loop3,blocksize=1024 This would allow you to access the iso file before burning it and realizing there was an error in the file. This happened to me once. I downloaded a 600 MB ISO file over my cable modem and burned a CD. I realized the file was currupt after 2 CDs the next day my friend told me about this little trick

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
  23. Easy way to burn your ISO's in Linux! by benmhall · · Score: 1

    If you just want to burn the iso, but don't want to learn the command line stuff, check out BurnISO

    http://moses.penguinpowered.com/projects/burniso /

    You need Perl and Perl/Tk as well as the appropriate CDR software. I have documentation on how to set up the kernel and everything!

    1. Re:Easy way to burn your ISO's in Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, or you can get one of the 43 gui frontends to cdrecord :)

    2. Re:Easy way to burn your ISO's in Linux! by benmhall · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you could. Or if, like me, you thought you had something useful to contribute, you could write your own and make a 44th GUI front-end. My program doesn't do anything else except write ISO's. It's not meant to compete with anything fancy (I use XCDroast and Gnometoaster a lot) but is meant for people who quickly want to get the job done. It took me all of 1-2 hours to research and write, and it's a simple little Perl script. I could do better, but others already have. So, it's just another little utility for the tool box. Ben

  24. This is GREAT ! by J.F. · · Score: 1

    I'm using it right now, and i'm not sure I want to go back ! It automatically started using all my plugins from 4.05, found all my bookmars, is blindingly fast, has the password remembring feature and more ! I can't wait until the official releases come out ! Now I'm going to do the CSS testing and Acid Box :)

    1. Re:This is GREAT ! by Bishop · · Score: 1

      The password remembering feature is a good thing??

      Moz M11 is nice otherwise

    2. Re:This is GREAT ! by Myddrin · · Score: 1

      It's optional. I did a quick check out of M11 and
      it popped up a little thing "Do you want to remember this password?" or some such.

      --
      Myddrin
    3. Re:This is GREAT ! by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, actually. It asks your permission to remember passwords, and it's open source so you can make sure it doesn't hose you. So you get the convenience of not typing passwords, with most of your paranoia problems being irrelevant. I'd say that a Good Thing (TM).

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
  25. Re:[not a] Dumb Mozilla Question by cloudmaster · · Score: 1
    What the heck is a Profile?

    Wintel machines (I'm not sure about Macs) can set up "user profiles" so multiple users of the machine can have their own settings without installing a new copy of netscape. Each profile has independent user preferences (all of them) and bookmarks.

    Netscape also has a feature called "roaming profiles" that allows user settings to be kept in sync on an LDAP server or on a web server. I personally use the roaming profiles with my linux boxes at home and the wintel/linux machines at work. It's damned handy.

    A quick search at developer.netscape.com outghtta turn up something more descriptive...

  26. Watch out, it's not for the youngins!!! by dirty · · Score: 3

    1. YOU CERTIFY THAT YOU ARE NOT A MINOR AND THAT YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL OF THE
    TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET OUT IN THE LICENSE BELOW. DOWNLOADING AND/OR USING THE
    PRODUCT WILL BE AN IRREVOCABLE ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
    LICENSE.

    Guess we gotta keep those kiddies away from Linux, it's worse than crack :). Dare to keep kids off Linux.

    --

    -matt
    1. Re:Watch out, it's not for the youngins!!! by smileyy · · Score: 1

      To be a dull, pragmatic reply to what was meant to be a humorous post, I'm sure this is because minors (in the US...hmmm...) can't agree to contracts such as license agreements.

      --
      pooptruck
    2. Re:Watch out, it's not for the youngins!!! by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      With most other Linux distributions you don't have to worry about this kind of crap.

      I think Corel is doing some really good things towards increasing acceptance of Linux. However, I think they need to get legal and financial staff that aren't so anal retentive.

      One of the joys of Linux is not having to sweat the details of different license agreements. That's one of the reasons we are often chossing Linux over Digital Unix and Solaris where I work. I realize that many people are really tired of hearing Linux users complain about license agreements. But I think Corel would be better off - financially and legally, if they would just GPL this stuff.

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
    3. Re:Watch out, it's not for the youngins!!! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I expect this kind of requirement to become more common. Previously linux distributions have come from small companies, without a staff of lawyers. This may be legally required boilerplate. CYA, and all that.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Watch out, it's not for the youngins!!! by Danse · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the point of them adding the "YOU CERTIFY THAT YOU ARE NOT A MINOR" part if the kid can't even legally agree to that part?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  27. mozilla crashed on me... by JackAssPenguin · · Score: 1

    Has this happened to anyone else? I'm running on win32 (blah) and as I open the browser it crashes. I've deleted the mozreg file and the Users50 directory. I've tried importing my old profile in and alternatively running the wizard and creating one on the command line. Nadda.
    The page draws itself up and then Dr Watson pops up.

    viewer.exe runs perfectly.

    email: 3->e

    --
    "DNA is God's contribution to the Open Source movement"
    1. Re:mozilla crashed on me... by Topar · · Score: 1

      Do you have Java 1.3 installed. If so, read the release notes for a fix.

  28. First look on Corel Linux by J-F+Mammet · · Score: 5

    I installed corel linux from the iso yesterday evening (european time).

    The installation is quite good. It automatically detected all my hardware (ok I've got a simple machine : voodoo banshee, ne2000 pci clone ide hd). Then the graphical installer asked me for a user login name, good point. After that I had to choose between some premade configurations, like destop/server/custom). I choosed custom. With this option I had the possibility to choose to install any package of the distribution. I choosed almost all of them and went to the next step.

    Now I had to choose on what partition I wanted to install, an ext2 one or a windows/dos partion. Good choice for beginners. Of course I installed on an ext2 one. The graphical fdisk is good and easy to use, but it seemed a little buggy for the free space calculation (eg it said 125 meg free but I could only create a 110 meg swap partition).

    After that is the rather long and boring package installation. No problem with it except the mouse cursor was rather slow and jumpy during this process , not good for a first timer thinking linux is a true multitasking os (I know it is, it must be because the installation is using the framebuffer I think).

    Then I was asked to reboot, no question asked about the boot loader or anything else, bad point here.

    After the reboot, quite a shock, the OS loader is not LILO but a rather nice graphical (320x200) menu with an animated disk on the lower right corner. I can choose between corel linux and some expert/safe mode. I can also choose windows and dos. This is good for non linux users, but I have 4 different linux installs at home for testing and of course none were found so I had to reinstall lilo (I'm pretty sure I could have changed the configuration of the boot manager but I had no time for it).

    The first time I choosed corel linux, and this was quite a shock : No boot messages ! The OS loader stays "on top" of the text and I did not find the way to get rid of it (of course choosing expert mode won't show this screen). This is very windowish and a rather bad point for any serious linux user. A rather strange thing is that the first time it booted, it fscked the partition so it took a loooong time and I had no idea what was happening (the loader writes some text like loading linux/check partitions and so on).

    then kdm was launched. A rather standard kdm, ala NT. I was able to choose between root and the user I had created. I logged in as a normal user to get on a almost standard KDE screen, with some new icons.

    There are of course some great novelties, like the file manager, windows share browsers and other great program but everything looks so muck like windows that it made me want to puke. I know KDE is really windows like, but with the corel extensions they took this idea to the extreme. You can even share a directoy by clicking on properties in the context menu, exactly like NT !

    Of course it's rather impressive and nice for a former windows user but I think some originality would have been a good idea.

    Here is the worst point : I did not find a way to configure my french keyboard "globally" for the console and X. The only way I found was to choose an international keyboard for each user I created. Really bad point here corel.
    One other thing to note is that there is no translation in the things corel added to kde so it's one other bad point. It's really strange to get windows half in franch half in english. They should have killed all other langages so no one would have complained.

    So even if corel did an incredible job developping some excellent tools and programs, I think the distribution is way too windows like and not for non english people. Too bad, hopefully this will be corrected in 1.1 !

    In conclusion if you are already a linux user, this is not for you. But for a windows user this may be a good way to start using linux.

    Btw a friend of mine was not even able to start the installation, it simply rebooted at the hardware check.

    J-F Mammet
    webmaster@softgallery.com

    1. Re:First look on Corel Linux by ucblockhead · · Score: 3

      I have two reactions to this:

      1) Corel did exactly the right thing. (Except for non-English support, which is correctable.)

      2) I likely won't install Corel Linux myself.

      Those two things aren't contradictory. Corel is trying to go after the Windows market. It sounds like they did exactly what they needed to do to go after the average nontechnical Windows user. This is very good for them, and, I think, very good if you want to see Linux on the desktop. However, this does not mean that this is a distribution for your or I or pretty much anyone who reads /. to install. That's ok. We've got plenty of good distributions to choose from.

      That's the advantage of the Linux model. Choice.

      Probably most of the people who install Corel Linux (assuming the marketting is appropriate) will never care anything about what's underneath, and will see it merely as a cheaper, more stable system that does what Windows does. That's ok. Grandma doesn't want to know what a tarball is. And perhaps a small percentage will eventually want to dig under the covers.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:First look on Corel Linux by bbcat · · Score: 1

      Actually it is kind of nice. This is the first
      install ever of Linux which identify all my
      hardware correctly. The graphic is beautiful,
      it actually looks just as good as the one on
      winblows.

      There are a few things though that I didn't
      appreciate in the install.

      1-The fdisk that they use.
      I had preformatted partitions to use and I had
      to remove the partitions to get it to accept
      (anti moron mode I guess). It turns out that
      I had to back up because it would have changed
      /dev/hdb5 logical to /dev/hdb3 primary, it would
      then have been a challenge to boot back on
      SuSE 6.2 considering that fstab would no longer
      match as all the partitions except for /dev/hdb1
      would move one. I then just mounted a 988M
      partition at /dev/hdb2

      2-The boot loader takes over, bad move Corel
      since I prefer the OS/2 boot manager. I must
      find an easy way to correct things.

      3-English only install, strange considering the
      big thing they make about their multilingual
      Word Perfect. No option whatsoever to change the
      keyboard during install. I have to try to remember
      where the keys are on the US keyboard, a pain in the ass it is.

      In conclusion, it will be a lot of work to
      clean up after the Corel install but despite
      that I think this distro is impressive. They
      will give the evil empire a run for their money.
      What they did is probably acceptable for Joe Blow
      but there should be an avanced install mode for
      those of us who don't want to run the install
      mode for morons.

      Anyone got any idea how to easily recover the
      correct setup, meaning OS/2 boot manager the
      only one in charge? you'll find my EMAIL at my
      website

      Thanks for any tip.

    3. Re:First look on Corel Linux by michaelndn · · Score: 1

      Well, we are installing it here. it uses debian packages like all of our servers, so it makes a better choice then redhat for us for the desktop.

  29. linux napster by Speef · · Score: 1

    that beta has been out for awhile now... my only complaint about it: it isn't opensource

    As long as the author of it does not use the original napster protocal client code, it is perfectly legal to produce, and make the code open. Not doing so is merely an excuse to attempt to hinder competition.

    Napster for windows is -incredibly- bug ridden, and the linux one isn't much better. The author not making it opensource just makes no sense, if he doesn't make it opensource, someone else will make a client and will, and guess which one will develop FAR faster and be more popular? And guess who attempted to hinder competition and shot themselves in the foot.

    It's an ok start, but it will soon be passed by another client if it isn't made opensource.

    1. Re:linux napster by Yarn · · Score: 2

      He has a very good reason, but I'm not sure if he told me in confidence or not.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    2. Re:linux napster by QuMa · · Score: 2

      Isn't it obvious? They want to remain in control of the clients, so they can add ads to the linux version too eventually. And they're afraind of clones for windows.

    3. Re:linux napster by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable to me. At least you're not having to do an oth.net search for the songs, only to find out you have to upload something to someones ftp directory, search through pages of adbanners for nonexistant passwords, or be forced to watch horrific sex scenes!(sorry couldn't resist).


      mcrandello@my-deja.com
      rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

    4. Re:linux napster by Speef · · Score: 1

      and it is only postponing the inevitable, someone will code a client and make it opensource.

    5. Re:linux napster by QuMa · · Score: 1

      I'm not blaming em, I'm just stating the obvious. (It's the easiest to state, right?).

  30. Re:mozilla release in response to slashdot article by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    Why don't you look at the ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly

    And you will see that they work on a release till they get all the features they want in it. Start working on the next release, continue to fix bugs on the previous till they reach a point where they think they have all the new features fairly stable. Then they release it.

  31. About Full Circle? by Dast · · Score: 4

    I've skimmed through the FAQ and release notes, but I can't find much info on Full Circle that is compiled into Mozilla. The release pages says "Full Circle Enabled builds allow transmission of crash data back to Netscape, improved crash analysis, and posting of crash related information to the netscape.public.mozilla.crash-data news group".

    That is pretty cool, but is it safe? Also, does that mean when I find a bug, I don't need to report it? It is reported automatically?

    Anyone have any more info, or pointers to info?

    --

    This sig is false.

    1. Re:About Full Circle? by asa · · Score: 2

      FullCircle will launch when mozilla crashes (if it's working correctly) and will not send any data until you tell it to. I consider it safe. Please report any and all bugs to Bugzilla found at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ Many bugs will not crash mozilla and so not bring up FullCircle. I hope this post is somewhat helpful.

    2. Re:About Full Circle? by crisco · · Score: 2
      Also, does that mean when I find a bug, I don't need to report it? It is reported automatically?

      While I don't know too much about Full Circle, I know that it isn't going to give the kind of bug report you could contribute. Information like what you were doing at the time, what machine configuration you've got and whether the bug is reproducable is critical to debugging it.

      As another respondant mentioned, many Mozilla bugs will not crash the program and trigger the Talkback.

      So browse the bugzilla website. Learn how to use Bugzilla. Snag a nightly build and bang on it.

      I finally did. I'd been going for months with Mozilla crashing one of my computers. Well, with the problem not getting any better I started digging through Bugzilla, found others reporting the same bug and someone had a possible solution. I tried something similar (having to do with Java Runtime Environment) and it works now. So, while there is still some kind of bug, we've got two of us reporting into Bugzilla a solution. That gives the hardcore developers some clues, something to follow.

      --

      Bleh!

  32. Napster vs. Real by humphrm · · Score: 2

    Let's see...

    Napster takes a list of MP3 files on my hard drive, uploads the list to a server, and sets other users out downloading those files, and it's a must have.

    Real networks takes a list of music-specific data files on my hard drive, and uploads the list to a server, along with some other access data, and they're a villain.

    And the only difference between them is (a) Slashdot's word that I should download Napster, and (b) some legaleze in the license or usage agreements.

    --
    -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    1. Re:Napster vs. Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that you know up front that Napster is going to do this: it's the whole purpose of the program. Realnetworks products were ostensibly to play music, and without being explicit in any reasonable way, sent information to a server without your knowledge. That's nothing to do with slashdot calling it a must have (I haven't seen anywhere near as much of that as I have of the "wow, is it buggy..." comments). It's not even a problem if Realnetworks does it, as long as they tell people FIRST and LOUD. Sending information about your files/system/whatever can't be hidden in some little readme file someplace, it has to be stated up front or folks are going to be understandably pissed.

    2. Re:Napster vs. Real by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      Napster gives you control over what exactly those people get to see...so if you don't want people to find out you have a taste for Micheal Bolton just put those files somewhere you haven't told Napster to look for your MP3's.


      mcrandello@my-deja.com
      rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

    3. Re:Napster vs. Real by humphrm · · Score: 1

      Yes, good point. But, the install process for Napster isn't obviously clear about the fact that it will catalogue your MP3s, upload the catalog to a database, and then expose that database to other users.

      A better idea would be to provide you an opportunity to build the catalog you want to expose yourself. Also, you as the "host" maintainer, do not have the option to control who connects to your PC and you don't even have the option of disconnecting currently connected users when you close down Napster. And the consent to this is not made clear anywhere in their install process except in their license agreement.

      For it's part, I don't defend RealNetworks abhorrent actions. But, I must admit that installing Napster imposes the same "read the legalese" mentality that Real is using as their defense.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    4. Re:Napster vs. Real by mr2� · · Score: 1

      Actually, the difference is that RealNetworks *doesn't* tell you that it's monitoring your habits and generating a profile on you before hand. In otherwords, they don't ask you permission to do so.

      Haven't tried Napster (and won't), but apparently through the installation process you either realize or are notified that certain contents of your HD are going to be made available.

    5. Re:Napster vs. Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real difference is that Napster allows you to pirate music easily (illegal) and thus we can ignore any privacy concerns. Of course if Real allowed us to point and click our way to theft, we wouldn't mind if they wanted to download our registry or our documents folder.

    6. Re:Napster vs. Real by humphrm · · Score: 1

      Actually I was purposely ignoring the obvious illegal intent of Napster for a reason.

      First off, just to make sure I wasn't missing something in the install process, I checked with a few friends and confirmed that other than what's in the legalese in the license agreement you ascend to, Napster never warns you that it's going to harvest data on your hard drive or upload it to a central server. You may be able to figure it out, being a Smart Person(tm), but then Real could conceivably contend that the same Smart Person(tm) could have drawn the same conclusion about a FREE PROGRAM they give away.

      My point is that two people on Slashdot who have promoted Napster recently never mentioned it's downside, and I'd bet these people would contend that Real shoulda done so. So, OK -- we "like" Napster because they make illegal activity easier. Whatever floats your boat, fine. I still say the double standard stinks.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
  33. SlashMirror has Corel ISO by Slash+Mirror · · Score: 2
    and RedHat 6.1 iso and q3DemoTEST if anyone cares

    ftp://128.253.254.56/corellinux-oc_1.0.iso

    SlashMirror: Where to put files for fellow /.'ers

    --

    SlashMirror: Where to put files for fellow /.'ers

  34. Corel is making me money!! by LLatson · · Score: 2

    Check out Corel's stock price at yahoo. Up around 10% or so.
    Yippee!

    LL

    --
    "If you are falling, dive." -Joseph Campbell
    1. Re:Corel is making me money!! by AxelBoldt · · Score: 0
      Check out Corel's stock price at yahoo. Up around 10% or so.

      Please don't try to suck others into your little pyramid schemes. Thank you.

      --

    2. Re:Corel is making me money!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's funny! The stock market is a "pyrmaid scheme". Phew, thanks for setting the record straight! Corel really deserves this boost. Their revenues are 10 times RedHat and their stock is (was) 1/10th the price. I think Corel's value still has lots of room to grow. They have almost every product in new release. Just wait for the Q1 report.

  35. Wow, Mozilla is slow by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

    What kind of configuration is needed to run Mozilla well? I've tried the last couple of milestones, including M11, but they are so slow on my Pentium 266. M11 is slower than Netscape 4.61 and much slower than IE4 on the same hardware. There's a 3-5 second delay on displaying menus and it seems like everything I do generates a delayed response. Are there any optimizations/configurations that can be tweaked? (Actually tweaked is probably an inadequate word, about a factor of ten speed increase is needed)

    1. Re:Wow, Mozilla is slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that the milestones are built with all debug code contained. So when you pull down that menu, it's possible that two different menu functions are being called to calculate the menus for comparison, when you render a page, two different render engines are being used to generate comparisons, memory allocation is logged, etc, etc...

    2. Re:Wow, Mozilla is slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Mozilla UI feels extremely slow on my computer (P166/MMX Linux), but the actual page rendering is *much* quicker than Navigator. Pages render in under a second (assuming they load instantly, i.e. from your hard disk), even when they contain complicated/nested tables. Try some of the test pages included (I assume the Windows version also includes some test pages or a test client), and find out if it is Mozilla or just the UI that is slow.

      Personally, I'd like the see the Mozilla engine dropped into a fast and minimal interface. But it might not be necessary when Mozilla is finished - according to Bugzilla, the developers are working on fixing several performance related bugs. Try it in a month or two and see if it's any better.

  36. permission and scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No program should be able to transmit anything off my computer without my permission.

    I have looked at what Napster does and decided I don't want to participate in that. No harm, no foul. If someone else understands what is going on and wants to participate, then that's their decision.

    I didn't think RealPlayer/Jukebox transmitted anything off my computer so I installed them. But now that I know they do, I deleted them off my computer and hope Real gets destroyed by a class action lawsuit for invading my privacy, trespassing, and hacking.

    I should be able to decide what happens on my computer. Napster gave me that choice. Real didn't.

    Also Napster only uploads info about MP3s in a specified directory tree so you can limit what info goes out. Real transmitted info about EVERY song you played, ripped, etc.

    1. Re:permission and scope by icepick · · Score: 1

      Easy solution to this: don't build the shared.dat file. I don't know about the Windows version of this but since you have to run a special command to have the list of files it gives to the server you have a very easy way of deciding not to share your bandwidth
      --

      --
      You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.
  37. Proxy question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before I start Mozilla, can anyone tell me where do I configure the web proxy? And, which would be cool, does it support automatic proxy configuratio?

    1. Re:Proxy question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try looking for a prefs.js. If there ain't one start it up offline and set it in the preferences? Don't know for sure, but maybe it'll help.

    2. Re:Proxy question by Zimm · · Score: 1

      I downloaded the win32 version, and thus far all attempts to get the proxy server to work have failed :( It looks so cool to, I really want it to work.

    3. Re:Proxy question by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      In Mozilla M10, the proxies worked but you had to edit the files manually. (There are details at mozilla.org on how to do this.) I'm not sure if the proxy setup is working on M11. If it doesn't appear to be, you can also do it the M10 way with a text editor.

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
  38. Simple suggestion for Mozilla M-releases... by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    It might be an idea to make a 'user' build. The last time I tried running moz, under windoze I might add, the biggest cause of lag was the debug messages being sent to the console. Wouldn't it be an idea to do a build with these disabled so that the current 'real-world-user' view of performance can be looked at? (This would also go a way to stopping all those (it's SLOW) trolls :-)


    John
    --
    John_Chalisque
    1. Re:Simple suggestion for Mozilla M-releases... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not even beta yet, when they release beta versions, Im sure they'll do that.

    2. Re:Simple suggestion for Mozilla M-releases... by MattyT · · Score: 1

      That would defeat the purpose. Debugging code is there for debugging, and output from it helps to fix bugs.

    3. Re:Simple suggestion for Mozilla M-releases... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb shit. These releases are for debugging. If you don't want the debug code then don't download it. If you actually contributed debug information instead of just sitting on your ass leeching then maybe you can open your mouth. Until then shut up and stop wasting bandwidth.

  39. Mozilla: rendering problems still? by cswiii · · Score: 2

    (insert "html shouldn't be used for layout/design" comment here)

    I've got a fair amount of tables on my page; I've recently been checking to see how Mozilla renders it.. somewhat akin to the acid test page.

    Now, the page itself is pretty much 4.0 compliant, albeit somewhat complex; the W3 validator bitches about ampersands in CGI URIs, so there's nothing I can do about that. In any case...

    In MSIE and NS current versions, the page looks pretty much like I'd expect it to. There are minor variations, nothing of great concern.

    Now, in M10, The grey box in the middle was shrunken, sorta pushed over to the left a little bit. OK, not exactly what I wanted, but not horrid. In M11, however, the grey box gets shoved waaay over to the right, running into other tables.

    Thus, on first glance, it appears that something, in one of the milestones, is wrong. I understand that my page might not be really simple, that's an aside, and I will deal with it later. My concern is that the two milestones rendered the page differently. For the longest time, I've heard that Mozilla is (as in, yes, currently, right now) fully 4.0/CSS1/whatever else compliant. However, such observations have me wondering otherwise....? Could someone clarify?

    1. Re:Mozilla: rendering problems still? by Topar · · Score: 1

      Go and post a bug report in http://bugzilla.mozilla.org and it will be fixed if it turns out to be a true bug.

    2. Re:Mozilla: rendering problems still? by smileyy · · Score: 1
      Now, the page itself is pretty much 4.0 compliant, albeit somewhat complex; the W3 validator bitches about ampersands in CGI URIs, so there's nothing I can do about that. In any case...

      There is something you can do. If you want to link to a URL like:

      http://host/script.cgi?foo=bar&baz=quux

      ...then the URL should be written in the source as:

      http://host/script.cgi?foo=bar&amp;baz=quux

      --
      pooptruck
    3. Re:Mozilla: rendering problems still? by MattyT · · Score: 1

      > For the longest time, I've heard that
      > Mozilla is (as in, yes, currently, right now)
      > fully 4.0/CSS1/whatever else compliant.

      Err, no. Mozilla aims at full compliance with the CSS1 subset of CSS2 (ie all CSS1, but with CSS2 interpretations (CSS2 is not entirely backward compatible with CSS1) ). Any CSS2 it supports is a bonus (largely due to the fact it's required for styling the UI).

      There are various bugs in the CSS implementation in NGLayout, and they are being worked on. The point is that there are many less bugs than other layout engines.

  40. Corel Public License by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

    See http://linux.corel.com/products/linux_os/licensing .htm for more detailed licensing.

    It looks like the Corel additions are all under the "Corel Public License" or "CPL", which is exactly the same the the Mozilla license with Corel replacing references to Mozilla and Netscape.

    --

    -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  41. Re:Mozilla: rendering problems by asa · · Score: 1

    I would check Bugzilla to see if some one's already working on it. If you don't see anything that looks like your bug then make a report. It would help the mozilla layout team if you could reduce the problem to a simple test case and attach that or an url to it.

  42. If Napster is so terribly insecure... by legoboy · · Score: 2

    why doesn't someone who has more time than I do try to break in to a computer running it.. Like, say.. Your own. (It runs on port 6699..)

    I played with it for one second and got this.
    # telnet 127.0.0.1 6699
    1

    Press all the keys I tried, and after one keystroke, it says INVALID REQUEST. Don't press anything for 10-15 seconds, it drops the onnection.

    It shouldn't be too hard to figure out what keystroke is not invalid.

    ------

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    1. Re:If Napster is so terribly insecure... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      For that matter, why not start from scratch?

      They've got a good idea, but they've also got some issues to deal with: non-open source, security questions, etc...

      Why not just whip up an open source implementation of the same concept that addresses these problems?

      As an aside, I can see something like this being useful as a generic way of creating a public archive of files, not just .mp3's. A public guitar tab archive, or lyrics archive comes to mind.

      Anyone else think such a beast could be useful?

    2. Re:If Napster is so terribly insecure... by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I can see something like this being useful as a generic way of creating a public archive of files, not just .mp3's. A public guitar tab archive, or lyrics archive comes to mind.

      You thinking OLGA by any chance? I really feel for those guys, suffering the same fate as the Napster guys are going through, but for ear-transcriptions of the music. Nowadays they only link to mirrors of the previous full archive through a search engine. (I would be happy to help with creating such a beast, unfortunately I just now completed section 1.4 of the Kernighan/Ritchie ANSI-C book :( However if the project requires a temperature conversion chart I guess I'm your man)
      :)

      P.S. I have like 2-3 Smithereens' songs I contrib'd like 4 years ago in there somewhere.


      mcrandello@my-deja.com
      rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

    3. Re:If Napster is so terribly insecure... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm thinking something along the lines of OLGA. It is, in fact, OLGA's current legal hassles that make me think this sort of a system would be a much better way to share this sort of information. There's no central repository, the files are stored on user's machines. It's fairly easy to go to court and get an injunction to shut down one server, but suppose the repository is scattered across many thousands of machines. It suddenly becomes a logistical nightmare to shut down the archive.

      Plus, OLGA is nothing more than a web site and ftp site. What I have in mind is more of a distributed file archive. I'm thinking the architecture should be kept generic enough to make it suitable for sharing any type of information that the powers that be might like to make unavailable. Preferable, it would also be implemented in such a way as to guarantee anonymity to anyone participating on either end of the system.

  43. They have got the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla is making slow but steady improvement, which is exactly is to be expected. I am using M11 right now, but I am at school so it is nt (i perfer linux but don't we all). Mozilla is able to render one more of the problem pages now (cnn) but still not zdnet. Oh well improvement is the name of the game.

    1. Re:They have got the idea by Topar · · Score: 1

      ZDNet uses some non-standard HTML which will never work in Mozilla. If you want ZDNet to fix their site so it will work with Mozilla, use this link to send a message to webmaster@zd.com

  44. will corel work on the athlon? by N1KO · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to install linux on my new athlon but i can't find a distribution with the MTRR fix.

    1. Re:will corel work on the athlon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what the MTRRis, but SuSE has an Bootdiskette for AMD Athlon boards available on: http://www.suse.de/en/support/download/updates/62_ update.html

  45. Decoupled Corel Suite & Distribution by DrKirwin · · Score: 1

    Will it be possible to install Corel WP Suite on another distribution? For instance, could we use it on RedHat or Suse?

    1. Re:Decoupled Corel Suite & Distribution by PsychoKiller · · Score: 2

      No problem. You will have to buy the suite for 79.99 I think. Check out linux.corel.com for more info.

  46. Napster is a step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The concepts behind Napster is almost identical to a #MP3 irc channel full of bots allowing dcc of each user's mp3 library. What Napster has done different is switch the method to a prioritary closed protocol and put a prittier interface in front of it all. And despite what capncook thinks, tracking down copyright violations should be easier than tracking down on IRC. If your goal is to put fear into the RIAA then discuss a privacy protocol such as ZeroKnowledge Systems instead of a protocol which consolidates violation information and makes it available to anyone.

    1. Re:Napster is a step in the wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, right on, we gotta get around the man and his stupid laws. I'll steal if I want to and their aint n0thin j00 can d0 ab0ut 1t

  47. Additional Comments by Uruk · · Score: 3

    Nice review thanks for posting it.

    I also checked out some of the screenshots from the article that is linked in this story, and they seem extremely windowish. Right down to the file manager, whose toplevel entry is "My Linux" (apparently a modification of "My Computer" in windows)

    I can understand their desire to appeal to a certain segment of the market, and I think that they're doing just that. But I don't think I'd use it personally because of that. I didn't stop using windows just because I didn't think it was a stable OS (although that was one of the reasons) I stopped using it also because I thought the UI was boring and unimaginative. Look at X, and linux, and you have 2.0E50 choices for how you want to interact graphically with your machine. I would hate to go back to the same old UI after going through the linux learning curve.

    Points to them though for making the install easier, and for making linux friendly to new people. I just hope that they don't make it so windowish over time that it loses its soul as a UNIX. That kind of worry is probably premature at this point, but I still wonder.

    Seems to me though that another free software distribution stepping to the plate though means one thing - more choice. That's another reason why I'm in linux in the first place too. (Even if I don't plan on using it, I still like the fact that the choice is there)

    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
  48. What a nightmare by AXIOM13 · · Score: 1

    I was so excited to give this distro a try, but what a nightmare it turned into. I ran the install an choose to install on a empty partition. Corel said that it would automatically take care of partition space for the root and swap. The install
    went fine, I rebooted and the sys hung. Thinking that the active partition might not have been set, I went to fdisk and to my surprise I found 2 active partitions on my hard drive (weird). I set it to Corel's partition and rebooted. I was going to nowheres' vill fast. The sys hung once again. I got fed up deleted the partitions and decided to reload redhat on my sys. When I got to disk druid it would not allow me to create any partitions. It said that I did not have enough space, even though it was reporting 2Gigs free (weird). Thinking that there must be an invisible partition hogging the space I booted up the old PQ-Magic and to my stunning surprise I was informed that I had an invalid partition table. Oh goody, time to wip out the old norton diskedit. I thought Corel was supposed to be an easy install. I don't know about you but I think I'll stick to my old distro.

    DAN

    1. Re:What a nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like what OS/2 version 3 did to my system (not supporting drives > 2 GB). And I wasn't about to download and write to 15 floppies the necessary updates...

    2. Re:What a nightmare by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

      You only have to update the Boot diskette one to get old OS/2 Warp to support drives >2Gb. Not the hole 15 silly. Wow, imagine how many diskettes a linux distribution would use. And people call windows bloated...

    3. Re:What a nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At minimum, Linux takes one 360k disk.

  49. Build it. by asa · · Score: 1

    You can build that browser you want, and you don't even need to know C or C++. All you need to know is some javascript and the rest is xml and css. You can go in and rip out the chrome that you dont like and replace it with something simpler. Check out http://www.mozilla.org/xpfe for details. XUL is the greatest.

  50. You must be on Windows by LizardKing · · Score: 2

    Runs blisteringly quick on a PII 233Mhz laptop.
    Also appears quite stable.

    But then I'm running Linux. I assume from your ``IE4 on the same hardware'' comment that you're running under Windows. But then everything runs like a dog under Windows ...


    Chris Wareham

  51. No contracts with minors by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 3
    This is also true in Canada, and is likely true in many other jurisdictions.

    It's quite a dilemna; if they include components that have licensing agreements that require some degree of consent on the part of the user, they require an "adult's" consent.

    It is particularly a problem for software that requires something like unto the "dastardly" MSFT EULA; it is less of an issue with Free Software, but even there, there is some need to be able to enforce the terms of GPL, XFree86 License, and other such licenses, and that can certainly be problematic for the young'uns.

    A more pointed question, that isn't directly relevant to this particular situation:

    Can a minor consent to release code under the GPL when they may not be legally able to establish contracts?

    The fact that we might like the answer to be yes does not necessarily make it so...

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:No contracts with minors by rking · · Score: 1

      Obviously this varies with jurisdiction but :

      If a minor obtains software under GPL, he can copy it, redistribute it, create derivative works, all under the terms of the GPL.

      As a minor he CAN void the contract, at which point he has no right to copy the code, create derivative works etc, and no longer has the right to distribute any previously created derivative works. It is only the contract that gives him any rights, if he tries to distribute the software or derivative works other than in accordance with the GPL then he is breaching copyright. Voiding a contract frees both parties, not only the minor.

      This creates no problems for the GPL.

    2. Re:No contracts with minors by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I think Chris's question is what happens when a minor releases his own software under the GPL. Is the GPL binding on any receivers of the code/program, or can they do whatever the heck they want with it?

    3. Re:No contracts with minors by rking · · Score: 1

      It's the minor who can void the contract, not the other party so this shouldn't really be an issue. But even if the other party could void the contract the same result would arise, in the absence of the GPL contract there is no right to copy the code or make derivative works, thus no problem.

  52. Mozilla still not up to speed by s.a.m · · Score: 1
    I just dl'ed Mozilla for the first time and I was quite impressed with it. Nonetheless it was for win32 =) But I have one complaint. That is it doesn't handle DHTML as well as IE 5. Things such as floating frames are not supported at all, which I think is a very nice feature.

    I have had problems with netscape not rendering my tables properly with img's as backgrounds to individual cells. Unill we can implement the code properly we will continue to loose the browser war.

    1. Re:Mozilla still not up to speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it does support iframes, don't blame mozilla for the work of sloppy web developers. I had no probs with images in cells. I doubt you tried mozilla, that's kind of sad, you shouldn't post.

    2. Re:Mozilla still not up to speed by MattyT · · Score: 1

      If you have any specific complaints then file them at "http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/".

      Be wary that Mozilla supports the real DOM (from the W3C) and not the Microsoft one or the Netscape one, and that won't change unless someone contributes it.

  53. I disagree by Roofus · · Score: 1

    Your comment was very informative and insightful, although I must disagree with you on the major point:

    Corel has definitely done the right thing by making the interface very windows-ish. Corel Linux was targeted for the Windows user, so why shouldn't they make the interface as similar as possible? Many people disagree with me, but personally I like the Windows GUI. I wish my KDE desktop was more like NT. Why do I use linux then? Because I like the networking features, the stability, and I'm an aspiring network programmer who wants to learn on a Unix-like system :)

    I probally won't use the Corel distro, but I'm excited to see such progress on the desktop. I think this goes to show how adaptable Linux really is, that it can be used in anything from embedded systems to medium end servers to the regular users desktop...what else could one ask for?

  54. Don't troll by Matts · · Score: 2

    I'm running it on Linux (P133, 64Mb) and it's also dog slow compared to Netscape. Removing debugging might speed it up a bit, but there are a fair few speed related bugs in bugzilla now so I don't think that's really the issue.

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
  55. Mozilla M11, Solaris 2.7, glib, gtk by mihalis · · Score: 1

    This is being posted from the build corresponding to the subject line. I had problems setting the proxy settings to get out of our WAN but I found the solution linked to the release notes in their bug listings posted very recently - the process works! I am going to use M11 as much possible from now on and may switch from Netscape if it only crashes, say, twice as much ;^) Chris Morgan

    p.s. compiling the whole thing is a beast...

  56. No performance difference between M10 and M11 by Darby · · Score: 1

    I'm trying it out with NT (I'm at work)
    and it still doesn't work with our proxy (admittedly it might all be with our proxy).


    Also it still doesn't work at all with
    javascript/CSS.
    I have a very simple test page with a few DIV's and a mouseover/mouseout which displays/hides the hidden parts. The basic structure is:

    STYLE TYPE="text/css"

    #corporate {

    position: absolute;

    visibility: show;

    top: 290;

    left: 200;

    width: 450;

    height: 135;

    clip: rect(0,150,20,0);

    z-index: 1

    }

    /STYLE

    onmouseover

    (window.document.layers['corporate'].clip.bottom =20;)


    this is all missing the brackets around the tags and other stuff.

    This works perfectly in Netscape, but all I get in any Mozilla is a bunch of overlapping text.

    ---CONFLICT!!---

    1. Re:No performance difference between M10 and M11 by Topar · · Score: 1

      Have a look at this page for why it probably doesn't work.

    2. Re:No performance difference between M10 and M11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla does not support layers. It supports standards. If support for the layer tag is that important, someone will contribute it... but it won't be the Netscape employees working on Mozilla.

    3. Re:No performance difference between M10 and M11 by Darby · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I've been looking for a page like that for a while.
      ---CONFLICT!!---

    4. Re:No performance difference between M10 and M11 by Darby · · Score: 1

      If you notice I use DIV tags, not layer tags.
      It turns out that it is the document.layers.....
      that screwed it up.
      ---CONFLICT!!---

  57. Mozilla on glibc2.0? by Chris+Frost · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to take the source to a recent milestone (or even daily build) and compile it against glibc2.0? I'd love to try mozilla out, as it's been a while, but am only running glibc2.0, not 2.1, for the time being.

    Thanks,
    Chris

    1. Re:Mozilla on glibc2.0? by puetzk · · Score: 1

      No, there are serious problems with threads and re-entrency

      I don't know the details, but there is a little link right by the
      download to http://www.deja.com/[LB=http://www.mozilla.org/]/m sgid.xp?MID=
      which claims to explain what the problems are.

      No you'll probably have to upgrade before it works...

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
  58. I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by eeyem · · Score: 1

    I have already written a GNOME Napster client, without any help from the author of Napster. The downloading interface is a bit sketchy right now (GtkClist can't pack widgets, even though the docs say they can!@#), but it works, kinda.

    There are two issues:
    1) If my client doesn't display ads, then Napster, Inc doesn't get any money, which will eventually make the server go down. If I release the source, it would be trivial for someone to "remove" the ads code. There is also the issue of "free software" when it has ADVERTISEMENTS in it.

    2) If I release the source, everyone will know the Napster protocol, opening lots of security holes.

    Can anyone propose a solution to these problems?

    Evan

    --
    http://students.washington.edu/eeyem
    1. Re:I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      There are two issues: 1) If my client doesn't display ads, then Napster, Inc doesn't get any money, which will eventually make the server go down. If I release the source, it would be trivial for someone to "remove" the ads code. There is also the issue of "free software" when it has ADVERTISEMENTS in it. If you have already done this then others will do it as well. This may be an idea whose time has come but it ultimately will not be practical for Napster. Whether you release your client or not someone else WILL release one with adverts removed. This need not be a bad thing. It should enable others to set up servers as well. This will inevitably devolve to a kind of IRC/FTP hybrid. Napster should not be relying on the obscurity of his protocol to insure his revenue. 2) If I release the source, everyone will know the Napster protocol, opening lots of security holes. And why is this bad? You've basically stated that Napster relies on Security Through Obscurity. Security holes WILL be found whether you release your source or not. The worst thing that will happen is that the protocol may gain some security features.

    2. Re:I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 1
      2) If I release the source, everyone will know the Napster protocol, opening lots of security holes.

      ... And if you don't release the source, someone will just reverse engineer the whole protocol like you did and find an exploitable hole in the binary-only napster server by brute force. It's only a matter of time, you know.

      The solution? I'd write a decentralised Mp3 trading program (that, instead of a central server or two has a decentralised network. sort of like IRC, only with less coordination). I don't have the bandwidth to test such a thing, or the time to implement it but I think it'd be a viable project.

      Besides, binary-only adware is evil. Especially when the protocol (and other stuff, most likely. I haven't tried napster out) is kept closed.

    3. Re:I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by eeyem · · Score: 1
      "I'd write a decentralised Mp3 trading program (that, instead of a central server or two has a decentralised network. sort of like IRC, only with less coordination). I don't have the bandwidth to test such a thing, or the time to implement it but I think it'd be a viable project."

      That's exactly what the ads are paying for: not only the time/effort to write such a server, but the exorbitant bandwidth required for such a project.

      --
      http://students.washington.edu/eeyem
    4. Re:I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) If my client doesn't display ads, then Napster, Inc doesn't get any money If I gave a shit about corps making money then I'll just go out and buy the CD instead of downloading MP3s. Napster should be open source anyways you'll be making the world a better place. I'd love to see GtkNapster.

    5. Re:I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by Thunder_ · · Score: 1

      holy crap another linux user at the udub, i though everyone else here was a microsoft lover ;)

    6. Re:I've written a GNOME Napster client; concerns by eeyem · · Score: 1

      There's a LUG here, I think. The link to their website is broken on the UW pages, though. :P

      --
      http://students.washington.edu/eeyem
  59. M11 is nice and all... but no Solaris Build! by Andrew+Gilmore · · Score: 1

    Since I've been hearing all about this, and figure it can't be too bad, I wanted to help out with the Mozilla effort.

    However, Mozilla doesn't run AT ALL on solaris currently, and there appears to be multiple nasty bugs keeping that from happening, even if I build it from source. (at least some are understood fairly well)


    Therefore, I'll stick with Netscape, but all that's keeping me from beating on Mozilla is the fact that it is not available for my platform. UG!

    --
    ------ Nope, Not me, you can't prove I said that!
  60. Corel Linux was AWESOME!!! by absolute · · Score: 1

    I tried installing it on my friends computer and all I have to say is WoW!!! It preconfigured pretty much everything except for sound and the printer. Other than that it was able to set up my friends computer to work on our college residence network on the internet, detect an NFS on my computer, and properly detect my friends video card. The filemanger is really nice too, I can't wait till the KDE team brings all the changes to the main KDE distro. The only real problems with the install was the fact that it stayed at 98% for several minutes, mind you it wasn't hung, but it was still installing programs.

    Other than that I would recommend Corel Linux to anybody, especially newbies who want to try Linux for the very first time...

    1. Re:Corel Linux was AWESOME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hung, as you said, at 98% on my machine, also. While it wasn't fatal in any regard, it was just a small minor annoyance.

      Things I Like:

      * As far as I can tell so far, the Dekstop Plus did fairly well at installing things that were needed. In other words, it didn't install a bunch of useless stuff.

      * Initial iso image size (approx. 311mb). I think this is due to the fact that the people actually took a look and saw what was actually needed by most people. I'm glad one distro finally got around to doing so. The size was starting to get rediculous for some distros (ie...Debian, Red Hat, etc.) That's just my personal opinion, of course.

      * The hacked lilo thing was nice. What really seemed neat was the "Safe Mode" option. They had several kernels, and I assume safe mode only had necessary things precompiled in it. VERY good idea.

      * Networking set up (parts of it, atleast...see the "Problems" section). Setting up your IP, etc. was very similar to that of Windows.

      * Applications menu--I was very happy when I saw that they actually sorted out the applications menu. No longer was it huge and whatnot, but nicely compact.

      * Icons, toolbar, etc. were visually pleasing.

      * I didn't have to set up X at ALL. This was very strange because usually the mouse, or the video, or something else screws up and I have to manually change things. The sucker just set me up at 1078x whatever resolution it is. Sorry...can't remember the specific number.

      Problems:

      * Regular kernel seems to be broken, too some extent. They didn't have two seperate kernels on the CD for scsi and ide. It's nothing big, just annoying when your screen scrolls with error messages.

      * 3com 3c509 card didn't get detected correcty. *sigh* I was really dissapointed in that.

      Conclusion:

      Overall I was pleased. Installation was a TON more simple than that of OpenLinux. I'm not saying that because I mind not having a GUI to install from (personally, I prefer the old python installation with RedHat and Mandrake) but this one did all of the word for you, and a very good, too.

      The only thing that is going to be hard for newbies is getting some hardware to work correctly. For example, let me refer back to my NIC incident. I doubt they would know how to fix such a problem. Personally, I don't know myself, except for just recompile the kernel and make sure the modules are installed correctly that time.

      Well, I hope this helps somebody. It's well worth the download if you have the bandwith to spare.

    2. Re:Corel Linux was AWESOME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was really impressed with: a. as mentioned above - it did a perfect job of setting up X to full color and full resolution, without even asking me 1 question about what type of video card I had. VERY GOOD b. it did some great stuff with LILO. (It even was kind enough to include my other distributions on the lilo menu. c. the hacks to KDE were great. (display properties and network setup. Where it fell on its face a. My 3c509 was not detected (and I was never asked about what kind of network card I had) -- after I configured the network with the cool KDE control panel network option hack -- I had to manually add the 3c509 as a module and reboot...(not something a newbie would find to easy) b. It figured since my SB16 was not plug and play - then I must not need sound...(Running the "hidden" sound config tool it told me in essence "No PNP card -- no sound -- if you want sound you need to upgrade to Corel Deluxe..." (A quick kernel doc brushup later -- I had the right modprobe commands to get me into the land of the undeaf) Needless to say -- what good is it to simplify Video setup and create a otherwise solid distribution, yet fall flat on their face when it came to Network & Sound -- and the worse part is that since they never ask you what you have, they figure if they can't find it -- you don't need it! hmmm....IMHO

  61. Mac version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mac Version is looking better --more stable,less buggy-- than the Linux version. I guess it would be possible to make some kind of assinine comment about Linux GPL'ers cutting off their noses to spite their faces, but that wouldn't really be constructive.

    Thanks to all the Mozilla Coders (may your numbers increase)!

  62. Don't be too concerned. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    Reverse-engineering is perfectly legal. It's safe for me to assume that that's what you've done in order to make a working Napster client without help from the author. You should have no problems (read: Napster should have no legal issues with you) releasing your client. There should also be no problem with releasing the source code to your program, since it's your code and not Napster's. If it weren't for people like you who spend the time to figure out how a "secret" protocol works, there'd be no real useful ICQ clients for Linux.

    Go for it, I say.

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Don't be too concerned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know reverse engineering is legal but is it ok to use their servers with an unofficial client?

      I don't mean this in a specifically napster kinda way.. but more a in the future could small print say you're only allowed to use official clients?

  63. Is Napster like Hotline and Carracho? by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
    I wonder what the differences between Napster, HotLine and Carracho are. All of them seem to allow to temporarily serve files and chat sessions from your local computer to the world, obviously intended for mp3 and warez trading. I think HotLine and Carracho are mainly popular in the Mac community. They seem to have some sort of tracker site to make it easy to find servers. Anybody knows more?

    --

    1. Re:Is Napster like Hotline and Carracho? by Wheat · · Score: 1

      I've never used Napster. Hotline was developed on the Mac first, and used to be great for warez and mp3 trading. They then released a Windows version of Hotline. After Hotline got popular there were so many leeches that it became very hard to find a decent server that wasn't just more "click on my banners to download pron so I can buy a 10GB HD to keep this server running!!!" crap.

      Carracho uses a different protocol than Hotline. There are a lot fewer servers for Carracho right now, but a lot better ratio of quality to noise. Carracho is still Mac only and it is still only a 'preview' release. Carracho is also more ambitious feature wise.

      http://www.hotlinesw.com
      http://www.carracho.com

  64. Corel GPL additions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I want to know is this:

    Did Corel GPL there *enhansements* to kde and Linux in general? Or did they simply take what they wanted, and made binary only add ons only to be used with their Linux distro.

    1. Re:Corel GPL additions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so damn smug. Corel is a huge contributor to WINE and as far as I know they give everything back to KDE too.

  65. Not rendering DHTML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new Mozilla M11 is great, i cant wait for the beta but still doenst render DHTML correctly. All the code of it was done on Dreamweaver 2.0 and in Netscape 4.x and IE 4 and 5 ive got no problems at all. The cubes should be dragable and are not, if you want check: www.terravista.pt/ancora/1255/cubes.htm

    1. Re:Not rendering DHTML by MattyT · · Score: 1

      Is your DOM code WC3 DOM compliant? If not, it won't work in Mozilla, because Mozilla is standards compliant.

      If it isn't, see "http://sites.netscape.net/ekrock/standards.html".

      If it is, file a bug at "http://bugzila.mozilla.org/".

  66. Solaris SPARC Build by asa · · Score: 1

    http://puck.informatik.med.uni-giessen.de/download /mozilla-sparc-sun-solaris2.7-M11.tar.gz

    Check out mozillazine.org to keep up on the latest mozilla news.

  67. NAPSTER,Input needed. by SETY · · Score: 1

    I've been working on a napster client for the last little bit. I've got the very basics going.. as in log in and do a search. The next step is the ftp protocol to transfer the files.
    Anyway my point is...Does anyone care? If so I'll release it. The reason is the current client is fine and all, but its not OS. And the protocol being quite simplistic there is no reason not to get a project going.
    Unfortunately my only limiting factor is time.
    so email me if your insterested dave@lb.gulliver.nb.caNOSPAM -NOSPAM

  68. But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is "cdrecord -v speed= dev=x,x,x " so hard?

  69. when will mozilla be ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know how close the project is to becomin a usable browser? All these media attention that claim netscape is dead seems like they're trying to force netscape to release an unstable browser. It's a good thing that netscape haven't gone into panic mode. It's a good sign that netscape is gonna wait till mozilla is ready.

  70. Corel Linux ISO by londenberg · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to help out a poor windows user yearning to break free?

    I bought RedHat recently but it won't play nice with my video card, maybe Corel will work better. I have the 311 meg .iso file, a cd burner, now what do I do with it?

    Thanks for your ohh so wonderfull advise!

    1. Re:Corel Linux ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrmm presumably you use the software that came with the cd-burner - sorry I know that's not very helpful, but not even knowing what software you are using I don't know what else to say. One thing I can say that might be helpful, however, refers instead to your experience with RedHat. You say it doesn't work with your vidcard - I assume you mean *X-windows* isn't working properly with the card, right? Text mode should work fine with any card. I had the same sort of problem with my vidcard with RedHat - with as little detail as you gave I can't be sure this will help but it's a good guess I think, I hope it helps. I went to xfree86.org, found it was a known bug with the version of the mach64 driver that shipped with the version of RedHat I had, downloaded the updated driver (a tiny download even for a modem user like me, a matter of a few seconds, maybe a minute) and replaced the old one with the new one. Voila'! X works like a charm now :> If you can't figure out how to use pppd, lynx, and cp to do this, don't worry, just configure X (Xconfigurator should do this in a textmode-gui) to use generic 640x480 VGA long enough to get the driver and copy it over the existing one (it should be in /usr/X11R6/bin. ) Good luck!

  71. napster is violating LGPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is against the LGPL to distribute static binaries and not the dynamically linked version. Will someone notify him?

  72. is it just me or.. by Catatonic+Dismay · · Score: 1

    does the linux interface look like a bitchx/ircii rip off? well ofcourse it is but, i wonder if they're using any gpl'ed code...

    --
    rm -rf ~/.signature
  73. Re:Mozilla on glibc2.0? [aargh, cut off] by puetzk · · Score: 1

    It cut off my URL! WTF? OK, go to www.mozilla.org, hit M11, and look right under "i386 tar.gz format"

    --
    The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
  74. Looking at Napster with Sniffit (a sniffer) by undertoad · · Score: 1

    Check out the connection from you to napster.com when you log in. Napster sends your password as clear text. Actually, I'm a little fuzzy on why they have a password to log in since it is not used to control access to your drive and anyone can sign up. In any case, we all know that lusers can't remember more than one password anyways so it could still be useful. Also check out the connection either way when requesting a file. The full path to the requested file is given. Hint: c:\ means the user is running windows. \ means unix. You already have their IP. Ah, it's the old security vs. convenience trade off.

  75. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be right on that.

    Shut up. No one respects the LGPL or the GPL.

  76. napster's paranoia is interesting.. by Catatonic+Dismay · · Score: 1

    Have you all checked out the different hosts it querys, etc ? They're so paranoid about everything that they don't even have a config file that sets up servers,.. the client querys a server ( 208.178.163.58 port 8875, napster.com ) which prints out the name of a random server and then the client takes that and connects to it. You can get all the names of the servers from that host.. Shows how they really want to keep control of it and don't want other people to even begin to start running clone servers..

    i'm sure something good will come out of this though. like a opensource cvs/irc client. that other person's post about a general client for any kind of files is interesting. another person pointed out that all this is, is a uniform UI for getting files on a irc type server. imagine the share of the market someone would receive if they simply hacked a opensource ircd, and included some other features that don't break existing irc clients. new enhanced irc clients could be made to take these features into account but older ones could also join the servers. That would gain a lot more support from people then this silly one corporation with it's silly client.

    --
    rm -rf ~/.signature
    1. Re:napster's paranoia is interesting.. by eeyem · · Score: 1

      Actually, the first query is to split the load across multiple servers.

      Linking servers is an interesting issue that can't be handled by the IRC protocol: you have thousands of people logging in and out, each providing a list of files with attributes, and you want to be able to search across all of the files available? Not a chance, unless you have some *really fast* indexing capability, and you manage to transfer *lots* of data between your servers.

      Don't assume napster is just like IRC, just because the linux client looks like IRC. There are a lot of other issues.

      Evan,
      realizing he may sound unfriendly but isn't intending to.

      --
      http://students.washington.edu/eeyem
    2. Re:napster's paranoia is interesting.. by Catatonic+Dismay · · Score: 1

      no shit. the client could look like a ftp client if it wanted. i'm saying the concept is very similar.

      --
      rm -rf ~/.signature
  77. Hmmmmm by crivens · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm expecting too much, but I'm very disappointed. Sometimes when I typed a new URL it would claim to have loaded the new page, but nothing new was displayed. I went to www.gamespot.com and what it displayed was a mess. It seemed very erratic; thats the best word I can use to describe it. I wouldn't be trumpeting Mozilla as the next big thing in browsers judging on what I've seen while playing with it. Which is a shame, as I want it to succeed. Back to Netscape 4.7!

  78. Install Corel from Windows without Burner by Power+Meter · · Score: 1

    Ok, so we have lots of advice for installing Corel Linux without a CD burner when you already have Linux. Anyone got any advice for us poor saps that only have Windows (95) and don't have a burner?

    1. Re:Install Corel from Windows without Burner by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      You've got a lot of options.

      1. Buy it in the store.
      2. Buy it online from Corel
      3. Get another Linux distro and then use the previously mentioned methods
      4. Convince someone to burn you a CD
      5. and I'm sure there's more
      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  79. Mozilla looks great... wish it wouldn't crash by Mr.+T · · Score: 1

    Well, I tried out M11. Unfortunately, it crashed three times in a row while browsing Slashdot and changing preferences. The funny thing is, M10 ran without crashing for me... Maybe tomorrow when I am not so tired, I will pin down what is crashing it and head over to Bugzilla. When you've been coding and testing all day, you don't always feel like doing more of the same in the evening... I really would like to see Mozilla succeed. I think the interface is definitely cool, and the pages seem to render much more quickly than my Netscape 4.7x. (BTW, I'm on Linux.) Anyway, I look forward to the day when the final release comes out.

  80. YACLUR by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

    Yet Another Corel Linux User Report ----------------------------------- Corel Linux is cool. I did i minimum desktop install and it installed Netscape Navigator. Dunno where the story about it not including netscape came from It was navigator not communicator, and when i tried to use netscape from "/disks/redhat/usr/local/netscape/netscape" it complained about __bzero in some shared library and wouldn't run, hence i'm back in redhat until i can get communicator going. And the option in the package update thing to specify standard debian ftp servers doesn't work, it'll only update from cdrom or from corel site. There doesn't seem to be any easy way to edit the boot menu, i wanna add a few more OSes to it. The fdisk thingy in the installer took me quiet a while to get a handle on, but when you've got 14 partitions it's always gonna be difficult i guess. CorelExplorer is pretty cool. But MS won't have any problems winning a 'look and feel' lawsuit if they want to persue that option. Of course it's debian based, so i couldn't figure out where the tcpip settings where (it just configures dhcp as default) and there were no scripts like ifup etc. Then i realised i didn't need to do it the old school way. Just open up Corel Control Centre (aka kcontrol) go to Network/TCPIP, put in the ip address and hit apply, suddenly i can ping everything. The whole experience was very windows like, but without the reboots and 'please insert the CD' prompts. I like the new taskbar and was about to say to myself 'good job corel' , but then i took a look at the 'KDE2 in action' screenshots http://www2.jorsm.com/~mosfet/screenshots.html and realised it was just the kpanel from KDE2. Arggh, can't stand this old kpanel thing, gotta get communicator going under corel.

  81. Look under the bridge ... it's empty by LizardKing · · Score: 2

    I compiled it without the debugging code, as I don't expect to be working on it any time soon - just wanted a quick look at the improvements. I think you'll find that most of the Bugzilla comments regarding performance come from people testing the precompiled versions. These have the debugging code and extra symbols specifically to try and get some valid feedback. However, the vast majority of people are only having a quick peek at Mozilla and are either incapable or unwilling to file a useful bug report.

    Chris Wareham