My sister managed to do it with a game shark. Perhaps you can't in the Japanese game, that was simply something I read and can't confirm myself, but you most certainly can defeat the game with Aries in the party.
You are able to resurrect Aries, but only in the Japanese version or if you have a game shark. If I remember correctly, you need three items before you move on to disc 2 in order to resurrect her, and what Square did was put a locked door in front of an area that has one of the required items that can't be opened until Disc 2. This effectively makes it impossible to bring her back without learning Japanese or hacking the game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but pictures already go to almost 40 Megapixels. Kodak just made a CCD that is like 39MP, Hasselblad uses it for one of their 30 thousand dollar camera backs. Here's a link to one
I thought that they already had a small issue with this and solved it by placing multiple clock sources on the die. My memory sucks so bad, I don't even remember if this was just a suggegstion or if it really happens.
I know it sounds like "you don't need this shit, it's just marketing, dumbass" but it does help. Especially IntraLase. Sorry, I don't want a blade in my eye.
Wavefront allows the surgeon to create custom LASIK procedures specific to your cornea, rather than using some standard pattern meant for your prescribed level of refraction. It usually generates a better result as far as clarity goes and results in less occurance of aberrations (LASIK induced astigmatism, for example).
IntraLase is a trade name for a laser system. Instead of using a blade to slice the cornea, the surgeon uses a femto-second laser to (rather slowly) open the cornea. It's a more precise cut and hence better. According to my doctor there is no tissue removal with IntraLase, as opposed to the microkeratome, which means if the laser makes an error (more likely the surgeon makes an error) you lose no corneal matter. There are also some horror stories where the microkeratome (the blade) actually will *jam* in the patients' *eye*. The extra $1500 that procedure tacked on to the total bill is WELL worth it to me to have a 0% chance of that type of problem happening.
Just sprung for LASIK myself. I paid about twice what you did, I went and got WaveFront analysis and IntraLase added into the package, which boosted the price considerably. If you managed to get all that for 2 large, you are the man (woman?, nah...) I'm still healing (in fact it's time for more awesome steroid drops) but it was worth every penny.
I'd say telecommuting is more of a "not everyday" type of thing. At least here, I can telecommute, I just can't do it every day. Perhaps 2 days a week, during a non critical time, I could pull it off. That seems to be acceptable, to me at least, because for most projects you shouldn't need 100% every day, face to face communication between the leads and the grunts. If you do find yourself needing that, then either the grunts aren't understanding the project specs well enough, or they aren't being laid out well enough by the leads. Either that or the leads need to relinquish the leash.
I bet you've run into hundreds of people who regularly go shooting at ranges, you just didn't know it. Nothing wrong with it. Target practice is a very tough skill to master, and it is enjoyable, even if the ultimate goal is to be better prepared in a life-or-death situation against a live human being, gaining the skill and becoming better through practice is very rewarding in and of itself.
super-
pref.
Above; over; upon: superimpose.
Superior in size, quality, number, or degree: superfine.
Exceeding a norm: supersaturate.
Excessive in degree or intensity: supersubtle.
Containing a specified ingredient in an unusually high proportion: superphosphate.
More inclusive than a specified category: superorder.
Latin, from super, over, above.
I've heard (no references, sorry) that it does take more energy to recycle aluminum from a can than it does to dig the ore out of the earth. Take this information for what it's worth, an incentive to find the truth.
Java purposefully does not overload operators because of the thought that programmers suck and will screw it up. I personally disagree and wish I could be allowed to have to option of being a "bad programmer" in Sun's eyes.
Why? He/she does not represent you, you are not their constituent, you should have no say. If you would like a bill considered in a specific way, you use the channels available to you, your representative and senators.
I wonder if it has anything to do with Zinc making a good anode. That might be a reason, since Zinc is cheaper than Copper. I'm just guessing, though, since I spent a half an hour looking for the reason and can't find shit.
The only time I've seen Body Armor mentioned in a legal manner is if it is worn when committing a felony, it adds another charge or increases the class of felony (from c to b, for example) against the felon.
C doesn't have fancy anything. You would have to write a module that you can replace at compile time to provide abstraction from the low level system interface for you. Your logic would remain the same, but instead of directly calling the Win32 or X or Carbon APIs, you would call a static API you wrote, and that API would be the one piece of software that calls system specific APIs so that it's easy to modify and still provide similar functionality.
Finally, I find that someone else feels the pain I felt as a child, trying to play "Parsec" and "The Attack" with that junk heap. It got to the point where I would turn the thing upside down and dig the handle into the carpeting. Then, in order to move, I'd put my weight into the direction opposite the one I wanted to go to make it work. Sad. By comparison, the 2600 controller (another shit heap) was a DiVinci masterpiece.
The reason FLAC take longer on the encode step is because they were aiming for an easier decode. Monkey is, I believe, a 1:1 encode:decode whereas FLAC takes more hardware on the encode side vs the decode side to produce a 1:1 time relationship. This means you need less hardware to decode FLAC on the fly than to encode it on the fly. It probably won't matter in a few years, but there you have it.
First off, I think you misunderstood the spirit of the first paragraph. It was there simply to point out that I was addressing your post, and not writing a treatise on laws that piss me off. I'm not starting a, "you did this first nyaaaah," contest. It's a fact, you posted something, I responded.
One of the biggest issues with people getting whipped is that other people need to perform the whipping. What if you're wrong? What if the man holding the whip is a fucking insane sadist and goes too far? Look at Iraq. They started going way further with their punishments for even lesser "crimes" than drinking. There are problems with people wielding that type of authority. Also remember, people aren't machines, by whipping them you don't know how they will emotionally react. You may make a killer out of a guy by doing that. Or, he may go home and commit suicide. You can say "good", and I'd agree with you, I personally am tired of most people, but the punishment has to fit the crime. If said person drives drunk and does not hit someone else, I feel that the severe amount of fines levied is a good punishment. If they hit someone, they are basically a murderer in the eyes of the law, and are treated accordingly.
You seem to not understand the difference between victimless and person/property crimes. I would definitely have a problem with your DUI around the block scenario. The issue is that if you never hit anyone, there is no victim. However, you'd be breaking numerous traffic laws that are constitutionally valid, since you have no right to drive. You do have a right to no cruel and unusual punishment. Getting whipped is unconstitutional, at least as a US citizen. Also, waving a shotgun in the air is victimless, no one is hurt and no property is damaged, however you'd probably be nailed with disturbing the peace and public drunkenness. You're right, it IS being irresponsible with a firearm and the likelihood that someone would get injured or killed is definitely higher (victim-waiting-to-happen, like you said) however there still is no victim, unless you consider being scared a crime (it is not last time I checked).
That said, I do not agree with the way that punishment is currently handled, I never said that and you are putting words into my mouth. I honestly don't have a good idea for fixing the penal system. Hard labor that is difficult to fuck up, like breaking rocks and making license plates, seems to be the best bet in my opinion. Also, don't get me wrong, I'd be the first in line to beat the fuck out of some asshole who DUIed around my block. I simply don't trust the government to be righteous in their charge if they were given the ability to administer the beatings.
As far as your idea with the anti-DUI device goes, there's numerous workarounds, sober passenger, a device that can provide "breath" at pressure for the machine, disabling the machine. This is slashdot, you know machines are easily tampered with and overcome. There is no solution that is 100% effective, you know this. The only solution is to remove the person from the equation. This relates to your idea of people getting it through their head that drinking responsibly is hard. It is, and it's also an unsolvable problem. People will always be stupid shitheads. This is why removing the steering wheel is the best solution. Cars are relatively cheap, it's easy as pie to obtain a vehicle, drive it illegally, and do it drunk. It's impossible when the pilot is a machine.
Now, there seems to have been a shift in arguments here. You were, at first, advocating 40 whippings for consuming alcohol, now it has moved to 40 for DUI. I honestly believe that, sure, you DUI you deserve most anything coming to you, however that isn't the right way to do it. People giving government sanctioned beatings is not right, and it gets out of control.
And lastly, no, I'm definitely not a "chicken shit puss[y]" who is "too afraid to take any responsibility with disciplinary punishment." What I am is reasonable, and that sentence w
Man, you suck at forming arguments. Your entire post is one giant bundle of logical fallacies. How the fuck do you know what I judge outside of the small postings I made here? I call you out on your bullshit because you posted it first. I'm not going to write a fucking essay on the merits of every law for your dumb ass. We are discussing your preposterous idea of whipping people for drinking alcohol, not the laws of the United States (which, you correctly assume I live in, however this site is international, I could just as easily reside in the UK, another poor judgement on your part). Drinking alcohol is a victimless action, drunk driving is technically victimless, impacting another vehicle is not. Learn to fucking separate actions.
To address your ineptitude: I don't drink and drive, yet I drink alcohol from time to time. It's called personal responsibility, and in order to advance as a people, we need to place more emphasis on it. You're right that people DUI and kill others. It will always be that way until we find a way to get fully automated personal vehicles. Until then, the system isn't perfect, and there will be casualties. Boo hoo, life isn't fair. Honestly, I would prefer to die in a DUI accident than to live in a place where such draconian laws are enforced. I value freedom (the faults of the US system notwithstanding) over my own life. How's that for an answer? I'd go right up to the face of a woman whose entire family died right now and tell her that, despite her loss, whipping people 40 times for drinking is not right. Your appeal to emotion failed.
How about this: In El Salvador, if you get caught DUI, you die. The state kills you. I'm pretty sure people still DUI in El Salvador. Think about it, punishments don't really stop most real criminals from committing crimes. Putting a murderer away for life is not a deterrent, even killing them isn't. People still murder each other every day. But that's not even the point and for some reason I've let you derail me. The point is that you can't logically make a connection that drinking equals killing. Fuck that. Your
I will guarantee to you that if someone attempted to whip me for drinking liquor, they would be perforated. Seriously, come fucking enforce that.
Slashdot Mirror
My sister managed to do it with a game shark. Perhaps you can't in the Japanese game, that was simply something I read and can't confirm myself, but you most certainly can defeat the game with Aries in the party.
You are able to resurrect Aries, but only in the Japanese version or if you have a game shark. If I remember correctly, you need three items before you move on to disc 2 in order to resurrect her, and what Square did was put a locked door in front of an area that has one of the required items that can't be opened until Disc 2. This effectively makes it impossible to bring her back without learning Japanese or hacking the game.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but pictures already go to almost 40 Megapixels. Kodak just made a CCD that is like 39MP, Hasselblad uses it for one of their 30 thousand dollar camera backs. Here's a link to one
I thought that they already had a small issue with this and solved it by placing multiple clock sources on the die. My memory sucks so bad, I don't even remember if this was just a suggegstion or if it really happens.
What a goddamn bitch. I can only hope and pray he got his ass mauled every day in high school.
I know it sounds like "you don't need this shit, it's just marketing, dumbass" but it does help. Especially IntraLase. Sorry, I don't want a blade in my eye.
Wavefront allows the surgeon to create custom LASIK procedures specific to your cornea, rather than using some standard pattern meant for your prescribed level of refraction. It usually generates a better result as far as clarity goes and results in less occurance of aberrations (LASIK induced astigmatism, for example).
IntraLase is a trade name for a laser system. Instead of using a blade to slice the cornea, the surgeon uses a femto-second laser to (rather slowly) open the cornea. It's a more precise cut and hence better. According to my doctor there is no tissue removal with IntraLase, as opposed to the microkeratome, which means if the laser makes an error (more likely the surgeon makes an error) you lose no corneal matter. There are also some horror stories where the microkeratome (the blade) actually will *jam* in the patients' *eye*. The extra $1500 that procedure tacked on to the total bill is WELL worth it to me to have a 0% chance of that type of problem happening.
Prednisolone. And I agree, I'd almost rather eat anything else than drop these things. Oh well, only a week left.
Just sprung for LASIK myself. I paid about twice what you did, I went and got WaveFront analysis and IntraLase added into the package, which boosted the price considerably. If you managed to get all that for 2 large, you are the man (woman?, nah...) I'm still healing (in fact it's time for more awesome steroid drops) but it was worth every penny.
I'd say telecommuting is more of a "not everyday" type of thing. At least here, I can telecommute, I just can't do it every day. Perhaps 2 days a week, during a non critical time, I could pull it off. That seems to be acceptable, to me at least, because for most projects you shouldn't need 100% every day, face to face communication between the leads and the grunts. If you do find yourself needing that, then either the grunts aren't understanding the project specs well enough, or they aren't being laid out well enough by the leads. Either that or the leads need to relinquish the leash.
Awesome, and here I am without mod points...
I bet you've run into hundreds of people who regularly go shooting at ranges, you just didn't know it. Nothing wrong with it. Target practice is a very tough skill to master, and it is enjoyable, even if the ultimate goal is to be better prepared in a life-or-death situation against a live human being, gaining the skill and becoming better through practice is very rewarding in and of itself.
Yeah the PSE bit (bit 4) in CR4, here's some info: http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=961/ddj9605n/
super-
pref.
Above; over; upon: superimpose.
Superior in size, quality, number, or degree: superfine.
Exceeding a norm: supersaturate.
Excessive in degree or intensity: supersubtle.
Containing a specified ingredient in an unusually high proportion: superphosphate.
More inclusive than a specified category: superorder.
Latin, from super, over, above.
So there are an uncountable number of transistors in the chip?
I've heard (no references, sorry) that it does take more energy to recycle aluminum from a can than it does to dig the ore out of the earth. Take this information for what it's worth, an incentive to find the truth.
Java purposefully does not overload operators because of the thought that programmers suck and will screw it up. I personally disagree and wish I could be allowed to have to option of being a "bad programmer" in Sun's eyes.
Why? He/she does not represent you, you are not their constituent, you should have no say. If you would like a bill considered in a specific way, you use the channels available to you, your representative and senators.
I wonder if it has anything to do with Zinc making a good anode. That might be a reason, since Zinc is cheaper than Copper. I'm just guessing, though, since I spent a half an hour looking for the reason and can't find shit.
The only time I've seen Body Armor mentioned in a legal manner is if it is worn when committing a felony, it adds another charge or increases the class of felony (from c to b, for example) against the felon.
C doesn't have fancy anything. You would have to write a module that you can replace at compile time to provide abstraction from the low level system interface for you. Your logic would remain the same, but instead of directly calling the Win32 or X or Carbon APIs, you would call a static API you wrote, and that API would be the one piece of software that calls system specific APIs so that it's easy to modify and still provide similar functionality.
Finally, I find that someone else feels the pain I felt as a child, trying to play "Parsec" and "The Attack" with that junk heap. It got to the point where I would turn the thing upside down and dig the handle into the carpeting. Then, in order to move, I'd put my weight into the direction opposite the one I wanted to go to make it work. Sad. By comparison, the 2600 controller (another shit heap) was a DiVinci masterpiece.
The reason FLAC take longer on the encode step is because they were aiming for an easier decode. Monkey is, I believe, a 1:1 encode:decode whereas FLAC takes more hardware on the encode side vs the decode side to produce a 1:1 time relationship. This means you need less hardware to decode FLAC on the fly than to encode it on the fly. It probably won't matter in a few years, but there you have it.
First off, I think you misunderstood the spirit of the first paragraph. It was there simply to point out that I was addressing your post, and not writing a treatise on laws that piss me off. I'm not starting a, "you did this first nyaaaah," contest. It's a fact, you posted something, I responded.
One of the biggest issues with people getting whipped is that other people need to perform the whipping. What if you're wrong? What if the man holding the whip is a fucking insane sadist and goes too far? Look at Iraq. They started going way further with their punishments for even lesser "crimes" than drinking. There are problems with people wielding that type of authority. Also remember, people aren't machines, by whipping them you don't know how they will emotionally react. You may make a killer out of a guy by doing that. Or, he may go home and commit suicide. You can say "good", and I'd agree with you, I personally am tired of most people, but the punishment has to fit the crime. If said person drives drunk and does not hit someone else, I feel that the severe amount of fines levied is a good punishment. If they hit someone, they are basically a murderer in the eyes of the law, and are treated accordingly.
You seem to not understand the difference between victimless and person/property crimes. I would definitely have a problem with your DUI around the block scenario. The issue is that if you never hit anyone, there is no victim. However, you'd be breaking numerous traffic laws that are constitutionally valid, since you have no right to drive. You do have a right to no cruel and unusual punishment. Getting whipped is unconstitutional, at least as a US citizen. Also, waving a shotgun in the air is victimless, no one is hurt and no property is damaged, however you'd probably be nailed with disturbing the peace and public drunkenness. You're right, it IS being irresponsible with a firearm and the likelihood that someone would get injured or killed is definitely higher (victim-waiting-to-happen, like you said) however there still is no victim, unless you consider being scared a crime (it is not last time I checked).
That said, I do not agree with the way that punishment is currently handled, I never said that and you are putting words into my mouth. I honestly don't have a good idea for fixing the penal system. Hard labor that is difficult to fuck up, like breaking rocks and making license plates, seems to be the best bet in my opinion. Also, don't get me wrong, I'd be the first in line to beat the fuck out of some asshole who DUIed around my block. I simply don't trust the government to be righteous in their charge if they were given the ability to administer the beatings.
As far as your idea with the anti-DUI device goes, there's numerous workarounds, sober passenger, a device that can provide "breath" at pressure for the machine, disabling the machine. This is slashdot, you know machines are easily tampered with and overcome. There is no solution that is 100% effective, you know this. The only solution is to remove the person from the equation. This relates to your idea of people getting it through their head that drinking responsibly is hard. It is, and it's also an unsolvable problem. People will always be stupid shitheads. This is why removing the steering wheel is the best solution. Cars are relatively cheap, it's easy as pie to obtain a vehicle, drive it illegally, and do it drunk. It's impossible when the pilot is a machine.
Now, there seems to have been a shift in arguments here. You were, at first, advocating 40 whippings for consuming alcohol, now it has moved to 40 for DUI. I honestly believe that, sure, you DUI you deserve most anything coming to you, however that isn't the right way to do it. People giving government sanctioned beatings is not right, and it gets out of control.
And lastly, no, I'm definitely not a "chicken shit puss[y]" who is "too afraid to take any responsibility with disciplinary punishment." What I am is reasonable, and that sentence w
Man, you suck at forming arguments. Your entire post is one giant bundle of logical fallacies. How the fuck do you know what I judge outside of the small postings I made here? I call you out on your bullshit because you posted it first. I'm not going to write a fucking essay on the merits of every law for your dumb ass. We are discussing your preposterous idea of whipping people for drinking alcohol, not the laws of the United States (which, you correctly assume I live in, however this site is international, I could just as easily reside in the UK, another poor judgement on your part). Drinking alcohol is a victimless action, drunk driving is technically victimless, impacting another vehicle is not. Learn to fucking separate actions.
To address your ineptitude: I don't drink and drive, yet I drink alcohol from time to time. It's called personal responsibility, and in order to advance as a people, we need to place more emphasis on it. You're right that people DUI and kill others. It will always be that way until we find a way to get fully automated personal vehicles. Until then, the system isn't perfect, and there will be casualties. Boo hoo, life isn't fair. Honestly, I would prefer to die in a DUI accident than to live in a place where such draconian laws are enforced. I value freedom (the faults of the US system notwithstanding) over my own life. How's that for an answer? I'd go right up to the face of a woman whose entire family died right now and tell her that, despite her loss, whipping people 40 times for drinking is not right. Your appeal to emotion failed.
How about this: In El Salvador, if you get caught DUI, you die. The state kills you. I'm pretty sure people still DUI in El Salvador. Think about it, punishments don't really stop most real criminals from committing crimes. Putting a murderer away for life is not a deterrent, even killing them isn't. People still murder each other every day. But that's not even the point and for some reason I've let you derail me. The point is that you can't logically make a connection that drinking equals killing. Fuck that. Your
I will guarantee to you that if someone attempted to whip me for drinking liquor, they would be perforated. Seriously, come fucking enforce that.