an order of magnitude higher than the 0.1% chance for autism you stated (from which source, btw?)
There is no source, because vaccines don't cause Autism. He was saying that EVEN IF there was a 0.1% chance, it would STILL make more sense to get the vaccine.
static String proto = "";//should be HTTP/
static String errorMsg = "";//output to terminal
static boolean errorFlag = false;//error flag
static String origUri = "";//orig uri2
static String uri2 = "";//uri2
static String fileType = "";//file type
static String contentType = "";//content header stuff
static String headerMessage = "";//header message
static String errorHTML = "";//error HTML page
static int errorNum = -99;//error code (404, 500, etc)
static String errorMessage2 = "";//File not found, etc
static int portNum = -99;//port num to run on
static long fileLength = -99;//file length in Bytes
public static void main (String args[]) {
String versionStr="";//the full HTTP version string
String versionNum="";//version number
String frontTok="";//first token in line
String method="";//HEAD or GET
String responseHead="";//response header
String statusMessage="";//status msg for terminal
String debugMessage="";//echo of request line
boolean hostMode=false;//make sure only one Host: line
boolean gotMethod=false;//make sure only one method is called
try
{ //check if there's a portNum argument, if not, quit
if (args.length > 0)
{
portNum = Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
}
else
{
System.out.println("Usage: java httpServe port number");
System.exit(1);
}
//time to create our server socket
ServerSocket serverSocket = new ServerSocket(portNum);
//infinite loop, waiting for connections
while(true)
{
System.out.println("Waiting for connection on port "+ portNum);
Socket client = serverSocket.accept();
BufferedReader httpIn = new BufferedReader (new InputStreamReader(client.getInputStream()));
PrintStream httpOut = new PrintStream(client.getOutputStream());
If by "brainwash" you mean parents cannot teach their children that Jesus Christ is their Savior who died for their sins, then you're wrong. This is a right guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Just because you can do something doesn't make it a good idea.
Many of you will hate me for saying this, but I firmly believe it should be illegal for the driver to place and/or answer a cell phone while driving. Period!
Are you also prepared to outlaw other in-car distractions?
Audio system Speaking with passengers Eating/drinking Thinking about something besides driving Being tired/upset/in a bad mood
Otherwise this sounds like a selective "It's easy to catch/observe so let's make it illegal", instead of actually doing an analysis. Just as speeding is easy to catch, but not the chief cause of most accidents.
Well, there is a difference between "share your toys" wherein the act of sharing does not create an exact duplicate of the toys and "share your digital music" where the act of sharing does create an exact digital duplicate.
It's physics that keeps people from cloning plastic toys. If they could, they would, ignoring the Plastic Toy Association of America just like they do the RIAA.
Digital media just happens to be the first thing that came along that makes copying really, REALLY easy.
I'm a business. Why the hell should I have to spend good money on making my facility accessible to the handicapped? Screw ramps, screw handicapped parking spaces.
Tada! Same logic applies. So you're against accommodating anyone with any kind of disability?
More seriously, what if high-functioning autism was a somewhat beneficial trait for a few individuals, provided not everybody in a community was like that, and natural selection has formed the balance we see now?
The exact same thing has been postulated about color-blindness, which affects 10% of the male world population.
Slashdot Mirror
an order of magnitude higher than the 0.1% chance for autism you stated (from which source, btw?)
There is no source, because vaccines don't cause Autism. He was saying that EVEN IF there was a 0.1% chance, it would STILL make more sense to get the vaccine.
Also consider this: nobody has absolute proof that vaccines DON'T cause autism.
Also consider this: nobody has absolute proof that my rock DOESN'T repel tigers.
Oh god, that "wa-CHUNG!!" sound of the pyramid flying onto the screen is FOREVER seared into my brain. Heaven help us.
I'm pretty sure the operative words are "Elementary School".
I'm sure the jokes there are just as tasteless as ever, just about different subjects.
Heh, I agree. I was required to be written in Java. :)
Hey, writing a web server is pretty freaking easy. Here's one I did in Java for grad school. Copy away!
--------------------
You are completely, 100 percent full of shit:
NIH budget in 2002: $19,319,125,000
NIH budget in 2008: $23,841,208,000
% increase: 23.4%
source: http://www.nih.gov/about/almanac/appropriations/index.htm
Not exactly double, eh?
*****************
Do you also remember how Bush was going to double NSF's budget? We all know how THAT went:
News about bill from 2002: http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200210/senate.cfm
According to the bill, NSF's budget was supposed to be $9.8B by 2007.
Actual 2007 budget: $6.43B.
Actual 2009 budget (even later): $6.85B.
So yeah, don't trust Bush or anyone who supports him. Nuff said.
If by "brainwash" you mean parents cannot teach their children that Jesus Christ is their Savior who died for their sins, then you're wrong. This is a right guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Just because you can do something doesn't make it a good idea.
And what string did you search on such that those solutions popped up?
Who cares, CDMA *sucks*. SOLD
Apple has always released crippled products and insisted that they were superior.
Yeah, I really hate my substandard octo-core 2.8GHz Xeon Mac Pro with 18GB of memory. So crippled.
Already been done, my friend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Willzyx
He's dancing in his Moon Castle!
Many of you will hate me for saying this, but I firmly believe it should be illegal for the driver to place and/or answer a cell phone while driving. Period!
Are you also prepared to outlaw other in-car distractions?
Audio system
Speaking with passengers
Eating/drinking
Thinking about something besides driving
Being tired/upset/in a bad mood
Otherwise this sounds like a selective "It's easy to catch/observe so let's make it illegal", instead of actually doing an analysis. Just as speeding is easy to catch, but not the chief cause of most accidents.
Indeed. Please see my sig:
Yeah, but I thought that fsn and tdfsb were created AFTER the movie to mimic the look. Not sure where I heard that...
http://wearscience.com/design/jurassic/
Proud owner of one. :)
+1
On a very small scale, of course: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGM-148_Javelin
Well, there is a difference between "share your toys" wherein the act of sharing does not create an exact duplicate of the toys and "share your digital music" where the act of sharing does create an exact digital duplicate.
It's physics that keeps people from cloning plastic toys. If they could, they would, ignoring the Plastic Toy Association of America just like they do the RIAA.
Digital media just happens to be the first thing that came along that makes copying really, REALLY easy.
As long as men continue to make more money and are in a better position for career advancement, women can make fun of us as much as they want. ;)
Anmd instead of having a bump on their head, now the helmet they fall on breaks their jaw.
If the fall broke their jaw, I think it would create more than a "bump on the head" if they weren't wearing a helmet.
Head injuries are one of the very, very few safety issues I'm really concerned about when it comes to kids.
Secondly, a hotel can refuse service to anyone, at anytime, for any reason. Hotels are privately-owned businesses
Then the companies/people who booked the suites need to get every penny refunded to them.
www.videosift.com/video/Futurama-Dont-Date-Robots
I'm a business. Why the hell should I have to spend good money on making my facility accessible to the handicapped? Screw ramps, screw handicapped parking spaces.
Tada! Same logic applies. So you're against accommodating anyone with any kind of disability?
More seriously, what if high-functioning autism was a somewhat beneficial trait for a few individuals, provided not everybody in a community was like that, and natural selection has formed the balance we see now?
The exact same thing has been postulated about color-blindness, which affects 10% of the male world population.