Domain: dict.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to dict.org.
Comments · 184
-
Re:Marionets are NOT Puppets
-
Re:Not a ringI've also heard that a lot of people are not very knowledgeable about humor. Not that it matters..
:)I fully agree with what you said though. Just funny how you took the bait
:p -
Dear Slashdot Editors:
In case you missed your vocabulary class on the day the word "potentially" was discussed, here is the meaning of the word. Please read it; understand it; then perhaps you will understand why your headline is not at all what the fucking article says.
-
Re:Ha!
The difference is that boxen is a word, and virii is not a word.
-
Re:Ha!
The difference is that boxen is a word, and virii is not a word.
-
Re:Legos?
No asshole, I meant what I wrote, Legos.
Whatever dood. I would never be able to keep someone like you as a friend. Too stiff in the trousers. -
Re:Smart move, actually
GPL bears no relation to Communism. Communism is the opposite of Capitalism because it espouses state (gov't) ownership of property instead of personal ownership.
The word you want is "Libertarian." -
Re:Wait a minute...Stop! My Sides! You're killing me! Both you and the other moron are letting your ignorance show. You have quite succinctly demonstrated exactly what it is that I and a very large portion of the world do not like about what, unfortunately, passes for representative Americans. Bravo
It's quite sad, really: any disagreement with you automatically means that I don't like Americans and any and all arguments can and will result in violence, in this case coupled with a strange assortment of insults, what I can only guess is a swipe at my sexuality, and a comment that shows your profound misunderstanding of geography. I must, however, point out that your message, such as it is, is getting garbled by your obvious mastery of grammar and spelling.
-
Re:We don't use oil for Electricity
Stockpiling guns and ammo *is* the end of civilization. From Webster's Dictionary:
civilization -- The act of civilizing, or the state of being civilized; national culture; refinement. -
tcgetpgrp, huh?
They also are not saving whitespace on function samples, using the style where each line of source code and each { gets a separate line in text.
Allman style. (Yay! Was starting to think I was alone in the world.)Don't know what tcgetpgrp() does? The index will point you to 4.3.4.
Big deal. /usr/bin/man will just tell me.
termios(3):tcgetpgrp() returns process group ID of foreground processing group, or -1 on error.
Sounds interesting enough, though, and everyone else seems to be happy with it. I may check it out. -
Re:Dictionary feature looks to be a disappointment
dict.org has been added to my bookmarks. Thats an awesome service. Thanks for this link.
-
Dictionary feature looks to be a disappointment
Well, I won't comment on WordPerfect for Linux not supporting dictionary definitions... okay, I guess I did. That stinks. But the Windows version, which supports dictionary definitions, requires you to pay for a complete dictionary.. it's the Oxford "concise" dictionary. If I'm paying for a dictionary service, I'd at least want the unabridged definitions, with an option to only see concise definitions. Also, it'd be nice if they offer a free alternative, allowing the user to specify a dictionary server and interfacing it using the DICT protocol. See RFC 2229 and dict.org for an example at what's available for free.
-
Re:Ummm. Wouldn't it be better at night?
Right now in Toronto (Eastern Daylight Savings Time) it is 11:30 AM and in Dublin it is 4:27:56 PM IST (Irish Standard Time?).
Indian Standard Time. -
Temptation."Thou shall not tempt" is a direct corollary (meaning 2) of "
... and lead us not into temptation ... "It's about time that 'Corporate America' learnt it's ethics and morals. Instead of buying lawmakers to write laws with which to criminalize ordinary people, it should be working with those ordinary people ( it's customers ) to create business methods which actually benefit both it and its customers.
IOW, & Addressing said 'Corporate America': If you don't want people trading and trafficking in digital media files, don't make them available to the public in the first place, or set up socially acceptable distribution chains for your products. What you are doing at the moment only brings disrepute on your nation.
-
Re:Not hijackingSince you're grammar flaming anyway,
Objectivism isn't at issue when discussing an objective question.
I imagine you must mean "objectivity". -
Re:More interested in what MS has to say
IANAL, but understand enough about law to know when you have to qualify arguments with "pretty close," you would be better off not showing up in court to try and prove your point.
Well, Blake (or is it Darl?), I think what this guy really means by "pretty close" is "spot on". Among the literate, this is known as litotes. -
Re:Two alternatives
Wrong.
It is actually ONE alternative. From Dict.org:
Alternative \Al*ter"na*tive\, a. [Cf. F. alternatif.]
1. Offering a choice of two things.
Artaxerxes -
Re:So, you bought and Apple and got ripped off...I think maybe it's time for you to learn something new today:
Irony: 2. A sort of humor, ridicule, or light sarcasm, which adopts a mode of speech the meaning of which is contrary to the literal sense of the words.
-
Typo of the original word for today's Fax
-
Re:Grr....
This is why you should use dict.org instead.
No definitions found for "incentivize"
Aaaaah, that's the stuff...
-
SlashLawyers: Here is a legal question.Regarding cases in general, doesn't a judge have the authority to weigh the benefits of a judgment based on One versus Many? I don't know the term, but basically where you rule one way because it would benefit more people than the one person.
To bring it in to kernel suit terms: you have ONE company (which by legal definition is one person/entity) who has IP rights (and lets not argue IP rights for sake of this question), on the other side you have THOUSANDS of other IP contributors in the kernel. Would it not make sense that by ruling in favor of the ONE company, you would be disenfranchising the THOUSANDS? It would stand to reason that the THOUSANDS contributors pose a greater good.
Add to this the fact that SCO have refused to adequately back up their assertion over IP theft (NDA's don't hold much water IMHO). As a matter of legal process, is it _normal_ in tech cases to sign NDA's during the discovery period?
Some things to think about at least.
-Bob
-
Re:extortion is legal?Extortion involves taking something from somebody else via an undue exercise of power. Threating to burn down someone's business if they don't pay you is extortion. A police officer commits extortion when they agree to let you off the hook in return for money. A fire inspector commits extortion when they ignore violations in return for a favor.
Does SCO plan to commit extorsion? That depends on whether or not SCO has a ligitamate claim. Of course, I'm sure the law has its own definition of extortion.
-
Re:I'm not so sure of that.
I don't think that the Sikhs rebellion was going to amount to much but I see your point.
-
Also dict.org
I was going to recommend dict.org, but then I went and looked at dictionary.com again. Seems they pull from pretty much the same databases/dictionaries (in English anyway), everything from Webster's to "WordNet" to the Free Online dictionary of computing. Heck, they even (both) have dictionaries of Biblical names & terms! Wow.
I can see why you'd prefer dictionary.com, though. They have better foreign language support, and a thesaurus; dict.org has several different algorithms for searching (that you can choose from), and you can also narrow your choice to a single dictionary with dict.org. -
Re:Democracy?That's because the US isn't a democracy, it's a republic.
Usually, when I hear people use that line, they use it as an excuse to disregard the people. Whatever their motives, they are wrong. A democracy is a government where power ultimately resides with the people. A republic is a form of democracy.
2. Government by popular representation; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained by the people, but is indirectly exercised through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed; a constitutional representative government; a republic.
-
Re:Trollilicious!
No! Do not despoil
/. with evil proprietary pizzas! Everyone knows that the ANSI standard pizza specifies pepperoni and mushroom. All other pizzas are tools of Microsoft/the *IAA/other generic evil people. -
Re:GT4 -- Car damage?
I had NO idea that GT3 had stoping involved... I might have to check it out now...
;) Although, for my tastes, I prefer Destruction Derby, and Twisted Metal... :P ahh... smoldering cars. *inhales deeply* -
Re:Religion in the matrix? Are you serious?
Here is a better link for you: here. It describes what you are.
-
Re:Chevy? Now nVidia?
Those dict-protocol URIs didn't come out right, but they don't work with mozilla anyway. They're supposed to be like dict://dict.org/d:metaphor, as in rfc2229.
-
Re:Conspiracy Theories
Dude, if your crappy-arse GNU/web browser doesn't have a spell check, you could at least use one of the free world wide internet dictionaries. Steve Albini told me that you are correct though.
-
Re:Where do I sign up?
Alterior motives weaving through society
I believe the word you are searching for is Ulterior.
Really. Unless you're making your own language as you go.... -
Re:Liquid Crystal Display Display?"NIC Card" is acceptable, since "NIC" can also stand for "Network Interface Controller".
I got in an argument with a non-techie over this once and lost, embarassingly.
-
Re:Columbia Picture
There is no word "conspiracist" in the English language. Honestly, would it have been that hard to actually check at dict.org or m-w.com? Or just open a dictionary?
Maybe save the indignant tone for the next time you have a leg to stand on. Here's a hint: don't take as your source people who refer to themselves or others as "conspiracists".
-
Re:I HAVE COME TO LIBERATE!
No definitions found for "contraindictated", perhaps you mean:
web1913: Contraindicated
NICE TRY MISTAR SMARTEY MAN!!!~1 -
Re:"Open Source" vs. "Free Software"
-
Re:"Open Source" vs. "Free Software"
-
Re:"Open Source" vs. "Free Software"
p.p.s. Speaking of dictionaries, look up "free" while you're at it.
Ok. I did that. Note that the first definition is:
1: able to act at will; not hampered; not under compulsion or restraint; "free enterprise"; "a free port"; "a free country"; "I have an hour free"; "free will"; "free of racism"; "feel free to stay as long as you wish"; "a free choice"
This is much more in line with RMS' usage when he talks about "free software". You have get to the 3rd definition before it starts talking about no-cost. That you would whittle the word "free" down to the single meaning which pertains to money is fine, I suppose. If I were going to choose one definition, it'd be one that carried a lot more impact than just "I don't have to pay".
$.02
-
'protocol' definition
from http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=* &Query=protocol:
From WordNet (r) 1.7 :
protocol
n 1: (computer science) rules determining the format and transmission of data [syn: communications protocol]
2: forms of ceremony and etiquette observed by diplomats and heads of state
3: code of correct conduct: "safety protocols"; "academic protocol"
-
Re:CowboyNeil out of touch?From Websters:
Irony \I"ron*y\, a. [From Iron.] 1. Made or consisting of iron; partaking of iron; iron; as, irony chains; irony particles. [R.]
-
Re:All about the suspense?!?
from WordNET
suspense
n 1: apprehension about what is going to happen
2: an uncertain cognitive state; "the matter remained in
suspense for several years"
3: excited anticipation of an approaching climax; "the play
kept the audience in suspense"
look at that third def. for a minute, even when you know the plot of a play, you can still be said to be kept in suspense by a good performance: Similarly there's an element of suspense in sitting on the edge of your seat waiting to see *how* the film will portray the sequence of events in a plot you already know inside out...
In this case, I think suspense is the right word to have used given the context of the 'to pirate or not to pirate?' question, since seeing a second rate ripped copy would entirely deflate that sense of anticipation, robbing you of a big part of that first viewing thirll.
me? I'll be watching on the biggest screen I can find :) -
Errorists
We need to watch out for the errorists. Like Jon Katz and slashdot trolls
-
Re:This Linux's big chance!
And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.
Ummm.. I think the word is inured
-
Re:picking nits...
We'll pick nits some more.
Used as an adverb, irregardless is a synonym for regardless, much as would be expected. Granted it wasn't a word used in the english language in 1913, but it certainly is used now. [Whether it should be or not is a different matter, but it definetly is a word now.] -
Re:When Raptors Fly!!
Um, stop believing what you see in movies.
A dictionary is sometimes useful.
raptor n : any of numerous carnivorous birds that hunt and kill other animals [syn: bird of prey, raptorial bird] -
Re:Makes perfect sense.
Effectivly they'd be assumed to be guilty then?
No. In order to go to trial, the prosecution needs to make a prima facie case. That is the prosecution needs to have enough evidence, that w/out defense, the defendant will be found guilty. If the prosecution does not make a prima facie case, then the judge can throw out the case, and the defense doesn't even have to say a word.
If the defendant doesn't show up, it's easy for the prosecution to get a conviction because all they really need to do is make their case. Undefended, the prosecution can almost always make a prima facie case.
But IANAL, so take it for what it's worth (Hint: not much).
-
Re:The Java experts don't agree with you
Are you passingly familiar with the Roman alphabet, and how the various letters-- 26 of 'em, you know-- correspond to the sounds of the English language? When you say "dep-ruh-kate," can you picture it in letters? Excellent! You're well on your way to spelling like a pro.
Point your web browser at dict.org, and type the word as you think it should be spelled in the little box. Go ahead, type "depracate." The online dictionary is actually smarter than you are, because it can recognize when you're misspelling a word, and suggest a correct spelling. It's polite, too. It even says, "Perhaps you meant 'deprecate,'" instead of, "It's 'deprecate' you fucking illiterate idiot. Get the fuck off our web site you cocksucker." See how nice dict.org is?
There you go. Now you can look up words without knowing how to spell them. Now get out there in that big, wide world and start spelling things! -
Re:The Java experts don't agree with you
Are you passingly familiar with the Roman alphabet, and how the various letters-- 26 of 'em, you know-- correspond to the sounds of the English language? When you say "dep-ruh-kate," can you picture it in letters? Excellent! You're well on your way to spelling like a pro.
Point your web browser at dict.org, and type the word as you think it should be spelled in the little box. Go ahead, type "depracate." The online dictionary is actually smarter than you are, because it can recognize when you're misspelling a word, and suggest a correct spelling. It's polite, too. It even says, "Perhaps you meant 'deprecate,'" instead of, "It's 'deprecate' you fucking illiterate idiot. Get the fuck off our web site you cocksucker." See how nice dict.org is?
There you go. Now you can look up words without knowing how to spell them. Now get out there in that big, wide world and start spelling things! -
Re:whiners kill Slashdot whatever sugarbitchNo matter what you do, you'll always be living in both a microcosm and a macrocosm. Nevermind that though, let's get on with the issue at hand.
So you say. Realizing this might help you become less provincial. As far as being in a macrocosm, I fail to understand how a human could be omnipresent to accomplish this.
1 - "...really intelligent people aren't leaving gems of wisdom here..." Are you berating your own post? Oh, wait, of course not. Realists never include themselves in any sociological equations. Now perhaps I enjoy John Carmack's posts merely because I've succumbed to a sheep-like nature. However, I still enjoy them, I'm still going to return.
You point out one person - that's the best you can do. Testament to my point, the place is devoid of real input. So of Carmack's crap is PR material, self appreciation. Most of the supposed famous types, none of whom can ever truly identify themselves as who they say they are here, typically are defensive or defending their virtues. And since the lameness filter is oppressive and dysfunctional, more "code snippets" are trolls than any real information. The denigration here is in part due to the editors not allowing mass moderating to work to eliminate the crap, but now its used (because the number of trolls to dressed up extrapolated conjecture ratio is higher) to suppress any non-populist thinking. Most of the recent changes to the mass moderation system have cost the user comment area dearly in terms of quality, one years for the days of the WIPO troll when most of the crap was at -1.
2 - "You also spelled efficient and conviction wrong..." And I note that you've taken the liberty of inventing a few words yourself. I'm not sure if you realize but it is, in fact, real life (and real jobs) that keeps some of us from scrutinizing our own posts. Perhaps the reason many slashdotters don't analyze their own words to such a severe degree is because they don't take their conversation to be of such dire importance. Seriously, you accuse me of putting so much stock into the comments posted here when I, myself, rate them as just a step above "convenient." In juxtapose, your statement would lead one to believe that you route an incredible amount of energy (though not necessarily an enormous amount of time) to your own posts. Disregard words, and juxtapose our actions, and one would be given the impression that the comments here are of far greater importance to you, rather than I. Your karma "whoreing" is another testament to this theory.
Coining you own phrases encompassing them in quotes is better than being wrong. As far as my job, I'm getting paid to write this now while still being able to great performance reviews. Your use of juxtapose [defined as verb, to put side by side, to contrast] is unclear. Are you contrasting my own statements with my own posts? Are you juxtaposing me with me, then me with you? Again, with regard to "whoreing", you read in whatever you want into my posts. I said its easy, not that I do it anymore - I don't have to.
3 - "which is how you refer to my experience to of Slashdot - baseless" You misread my post, great one. Try again.
No, I understood that you said my statements were as baseless as yours. While you may be willing to forgo the validity of you own statements, I will not do the same.
4 - "cruft" Just wanted to show you where I got the idea that you invent words.
This is classic. This just goes to show that you are not programmatically inclined. Your lack of knowledge serves to amuse me, let me quote www.dict.org;
2 definitions found
From Jargon File (4.3.0, 30 APR 2001) :
cruft /kruhft/ [very common; back-formation from crufty] 1. n. An
unpleasant substance. The dust that gathers under your bed is cruft; the
TMRC Dictionary correctly noted that attacking it with a broom only
produces more. 2. n. The results of shoddy construction. 3. vt. [from
`hand cruft', pun on `hand craft'] To write assembler code for something
normally (and better) done by a compiler (see hand-hacking). 4. n.
Excess; superfluous junk; used esp. of redundant or superseded code. 5.
[University of Wisconsin] n. Cruft is to hackers as gaggle is to geese;
that is, at UW one properly says "a cruft of hackers".
From The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (09 FEB 02) :
cruft /kruhft/ [back-formation from crufty] 1. An unpleasant
substance. The dust that gathers under your bed is cruft; the
TMRC Dictionary correctly noted that attacking it with a broom
only produces more.
2. The results of shoddy construction.
3. ["hand cruft", pun on "hand craft"] To write assembler code
for something normally (and better) done by a compiler (see
hand-hacking).
4. Excess; superfluous junk; used especially of redundant or
superseded code.
This term is one of the oldest in the jargon and no one is
sure of its etymology, but it is suggestive that there is a
Cruft Hall at Harvard University which is part of the old
physics building. It is said to have been the physics
department's radar lab during WWII. To this day (early 1993)
the windows appear to be full of random techno-junk. MIT or
Lincoln Labs people may well have coined the term as a knock
on the competition.
You certainly aren't as erudite as you may think you are.
5 - "And here is the direct link..." Can't argue with you on this point. But I'm afraid that you're still not understanding the idea behind my previous posts. My point is that we're both speaking with conjecture. Your failure to realize this leads me to believe that you're not so much a realist as much as you are a mere pessimist.
Pessimism with regard to Slashdot is a lot closer to real than mythical reference material mushrooming out of the festering quagmire that is the user comments sections. Of course you cant argue with me because I have show you that the creator of Slashdot does not consider the actuation device for the Slashdot honey pot. However, I would say the reason I come here is for flame war. All of this argument still does not excuse the idiot, Eugenia Loli, and the editor that puts her crap on here from being unqualified to review operating systems.
6 - "So you see, you are arguing, and commenting with a very small subset of people." Doesn't it stand to reason that this place would be a greater pain in the ass for both of us were there more people posting? I wish you would stop complaining about this.
Xenophobia. You have a little group, and any form of thinking that is not like the group is now allowed to prevail. I think that the Slashdot user comments section I rife with Xenophobia. There seems to be several tribes that have formed here. I am only glad that the greatest countries abstract democracies into a republic, because mobocratic moderation (judgment) is clearly flawed and has no regard for the truth. If "the truth is out there," your likely not to find it here front and center, you'll have to dig through reams of crap to fin it probably at 0 or -1.
7 - "You think you get good and fresh info from Slashdot comments in general..." I believe the statement was "...Slashdotters end up producing much more reference material..." I usually end up following links posted to smaller sites which go into greater depth on the various subjects
You sure you want to actually be clear on something?
8 - "I personally post good stuff when I'm not trolling..." I generally do good things when I'm not doing bad things too (yes, that would be me mocking you). Then the rest of your post goes on about how easy it is to karma whore, and why you troll, etc. etc. I don't really care. It's been said many times, and I believe anyone that's been here for a reasonable amount of time knows, that manipulating your karma is easy to do. I don't manipulate my karma, personally. If I really cared about it I'd be posting anonymously right now. If I really cared about this little fight of ours you can bet I'd be posting in HTML format and linking to material to back up my side of the argument as well. But you see, the discussion here isn't as important to me as it is, apparantly,[SIC: apparently] to you. It's just my primary interest here on Slashdot
I would not consider this exchange acerbic and effective enough to qualify as good hardy mockery. If you don't care about it, don't even point it out. Thank you for admitting "It's just my primary interest here on Slashdot." Yours. Not the world's, and certainly not any subset of those who come here that leave useful information behind. -
Re:Software Only? Sure...
talk to Microsoft about licensing it, as they purchased Pacific Microsonics....
Okay, I know this is dumb, but at first I read this as, "the purchased Pacific Histrionics, which seems very much like the sort of company Microsoft would want to purchase.
Well, it amused me, anyway. -
Re:This is great!Because the introduction of the Xbox has ennervated the games industry, like it or not.
Good try, but that's actually an antonym of the world you were *thinking* of, which is probably 'energised' (-ized for the Americans in the house).
Enervated means "To deprive of nerve, force, strength, or courage; to render feeble or impotent; to make effeminate; to impair the moral powers of."