Slashdot Mirror


Royal Bank of Canada Software Upgrade Goes Awry

Reader mks113 writes "Many Canadians living payday to payday have been in for a shock this week. Canada.com along with many other sources is reporting how thousands of customers have been inconvenienced following an unsuccessful software upgrade at the Royal Bank of Canada on Monday. All government employees (including me) in several provinces had their direct deposits delayed by a day or more." RBC has a comment on the mess.

602 comments

  1. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They actually pay Canadians?... With money?

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 4, Funny
      Of course, but it's in canadian dollars!

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They actually pay Canadians?... With money?

      They're called Loonies for a reason, eh!

    3. Re:Wait a minute... by Pxtl · · Score: 0, Troll

      This would almost be clever if it weren't for the fact that the US dollar is currently in the tank, and the Canuck dollar is up. Eat it boys.

    4. Re:Wait a minute... by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 1

      They do indeed. But now my pay is going to be a few days late because of this!

    5. Re:Wait a minute... by Zcipher · · Score: 4, Funny

      So that'd be a no, then ^_~

    6. Re:Wait a minute... by Sir+dies+alot · · Score: 1

      That may be, but the day will never come when the world compares things monetarily to the looney.

      --
      The stupidity of your average American is just about the same as the average European, we simply show it off better.
    7. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you have to understand though that when everything is said and done, and all the fiduciary comparisons have been made, you still live in Canada, and Canada sucks ass.

    8. Re:Wait a minute... by stuart1310 · · Score: 1

      Relative to what they each used to be, they are different. Compared to each other, the USD is still higher. As of this minute 1.00 CAD = 0741447 USD.

      --


      PS
      This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated. (mitchhedberg.net)
    9. Re:Wait a minute... by Luscious868 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dude, it's called a joke, chill out. People like you suck all of the fun out life.

    10. Re:Wait a minute... by tassii · · Score: 1

      Of course, but it's in canadian dollars!

      Better known as a "Loonie": http://www.etourist.ca/currency/

      --
      "I drank what?" - Socrates
    11. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Va chier

    12. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep,. A big giant ugly supersized ass,. directly south of us.

    13. Re:Wait a minute... by GordoTheGeek · · Score: 1, Interesting
      No, that would be people like you who enjoy mean-spirited jokes.

      "Fun" is generally shared by all parties involved and shouldn't come at the expense of others. But, then, my innate Canuckness is showing.

    14. Re:Wait a minute... by Kyosuke77 · · Score: 1

      Never say "never", it almost did.

      The Canadian dollar was, breifly and ever so slightly, higher than the U.S. dollar.

      --
      GET THEM INSIDE THE VAULT!
    15. Re:Wait a minute... by GordoTheGeek · · Score: 1
      You're a diplomat, aren't you?

      Canadian World Domination

    16. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were compensated with Beer and Doughnuts....Eh.

    17. Re:Wait a minute... by Phisbut · · Score: 4, Informative

      That acutally fluctuates from a period to another... right this moment, a looney is actually only 75% of a buck, but it has not always been this way, nor will it be forever.

      Here's a little history for y'all. In 1862, the loonie and the buck were worth about the same thing. Two years later, in 1864, the loonie was worth 265% of a buck. That's right, people could buy $2.65 of american money for a single canadian dollar. After the civil war, the buck slowly went back up to match the loonie.

      The loonie began to lose value compared to the buck at the beginning of WWI, then slowly restabilized after, then lost value again during WWII. In 1945, right after the war, the loonie and the buck regained their equality.

      In 1961, both were worth about the same, and in 1972 the loonie was worth about 5% more than the buck.

      At the beginning of 2003, the loonie was worth slightly more than 60% of the buck, since then, it got a big boost and almost hit 80% to be at 75% today...

      Notice how all those major fluctuations coincides with wars... Civil war, WWI, WWII, Viet-Nam, Irak... Re-elect Bush and see what happens to your buck...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    18. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get paid in fur and we can trade the fur for Guns, nice shinny beads and of course Fire water

    19. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It totally sucks ass.

      In fact, you and your friends shouldn't even bother coming here.

      Thanks.

    20. Re:Wait a minute... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can automate that a bit by using the Hudson's Bay Company's BayCard. (Also useful as proof of Canadian citizenship.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    21. Re:Wait a minute... by angry_leprechaun · · Score: 1

      How do you think we wind up with all those damn Canadian quarters in our change here in the US. Especially in Florida. I really wouldn't mind it if they were worth more than.... uh....$0.18 US.

    22. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, excellent economic analysis.

      Really, the only factor is whether the US is at war or not? Really!? Really, really!??

      Let's see ... seems to me Canada was in WWI and WWII as well, rendering your analysis on even the most facile level moot and not a little idiotic.

    23. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, you're a hippie. That's so cute. Go fuck for drugs, hippie.

    24. Re:Wait a minute... by GordoTheGeek · · Score: 1, Troll

      That's about the calibre of response I expected from an American. Thank you for winning the bet for me.

    25. Re:Wait a minute... by MouseR · · Score: 4, Informative

      That acutally fluctuates from a period to another... right this moment, a looney is actually only 75% of a buck, but it has not always been this way, nor will it be forever.

      Dream on.

      The canadian looney is artificially kept "low" by toying with the interest rates index to favor US exports, wich is the buyer of 90% of our exports.

      Only once has the canadian dollar was worth more then the US dollar, and it proved disastrous for the economy.

    26. Re:Wait a minute... by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that "The value of the buck drops whenver the US is at war", I said "Most fluctuations happen at times of war". Fluctuations happen on both sides, and during WWI and WWII, the loonie actually got lower than the buck, mostly because of the economics of war that was very active in the US.

      Winning wars improve the economy, losing wars hurt the economy... the US won the WWII (actually, the allies did, but for the sake of conversation) and their buck got better. Civil war was terrible for the economy (basically, nobody can win in a civil war). VietNam had the buck drop a little. Irak got the buck to drop again. The economics of war are good only if the war is won.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    27. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you're a disaffected Frenchie living in Queerbec?

      And to further the troll: the Canadiens suck, and they will lose so much money they will become the Houston Warhawks :)

    28. Re:Wait a minute... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Only once has the canadian dollar was worth more then the US dollar, and it proved disastrous for the economy.

      What?

    29. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irak got the buck to drop again.

      Irak, Irak? You god damn frenchies and your funny spellings!

    30. Re:Wait a minute... by GordoTheGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Stop! My Sides! You're killing me! Both you and the other moron are letting your ignorance show. You have quite succinctly demonstrated exactly what it is that I and a very large portion of the world do not like about what, unfortunately, passes for representative Americans. Bravo

      It's quite sad, really: any disagreement with you automatically means that I don't like Americans and any and all arguments can and will result in violence, in this case coupled with a strange assortment of insults, what I can only guess is a swipe at my sexuality, and a comment that shows your profound misunderstanding of geography. I must, however, point out that your message, such as it is, is getting garbled by your obvious mastery of grammar and spelling.

    31. Re:Wait a minute... by RetroGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was disappointed that the mint did not put two male deer on the back of the two dollar coin.....

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    32. Re:Wait a minute... by pmsr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Mate, according to the CIA World Factbook, Canada is "somewhat larger than the US". So, you have a neighbour country, you don't know it's size, say it is "probably" smaller than some random state in your country, and have the nerve to insult others in such a rash tone? I have to tell you this: american or not, you are a sorry excuse for a human being, and the world doesn't really need your kind. Well, maybe your mother does, but then again, what would be of some people without their moms?

      /Pedro

    33. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Democratic nutjobs would just let go - lose the rhetoric and actually address issues people are concerned about.
      Thassright! Who cares about democrassy anyway?

      Look, I don't want to burst your bubble, but for the most part the Repugs talk incessantly about guns and abortions, and they get elected all the time (1992-2000 being the dishonorable exceptions.) Being too ideologically up one's own behind is not a barrier to election.

    34. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still count money in dollars, but our $1 coin is called a loonie. If I buy $43 worth of groceries, the cashier will always say "forty-three dollars" and never "forty-three loonies."

    35. Re:Wait a minute... by papaTango · · Score: 1

      The canadian looney is artificially kept "low" by toying with the interest rates index to favor US exports, wich is the buyer of 90% of our exports.

      All you have to do is live in America near a Canadian border town to know how true this is. You can stand at the border crossing in Maine and see that the trucks are coming from Canada full and leaving empty.

      And there are other factors, too. Our fellow North Americans must pay sizable taxes and tariffs on things they buy in the U.S. and take back home. As a result, even WalMarts in America near the Canadian border draw few Canadian customers. Some may think that's a good thing, but they should stand at the borderline and look at the shops (or lack of them) on both sides and then ask themselves if it's really equitable.

    36. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, the dude thinks Canada is about the size of Texas. I love it!! Glad to see geography is being taught so well in American schools ;)

    37. Re:Wait a minute... by n.wegner · · Score: 1

      >What?

      It's simple. If the loonie gets more expensive, it becomes more expensive to trade with us, so trade goes elsewhere. If the loonie depreciates, then it's cheaper to trade with us, and we get more money. If we keep the loonie slightly lower than parity with the US dollar, then we're a better deal, and everyone wins.

    38. Re:Wait a minute... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      My question was more related to the odd grammar of that sentence.

    39. Re:Wait a minute... by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On behalf of the United States, I would like to appologize to anyone who was offended by the moronic poster who decided to insult our Northern neighbor, as well as assume that Canada is smaller then Texas. To the insulting poster - buy a globe, buy a hammer. Study the globe, and smash your keyboard so you can't type anymore.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    40. Re:Wait a minute... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      As a result, even WalMarts in America near the Canadian border draw few Canadian customers. ...so instead the American corporation Walmart opens stores across Canada (you do know we have Walmarts here, right? The idea of Canadians driving to the US to go to Walmart seems pretty bizarre), which we fully allow and patronize, and yield millions across Canada which they drive back home. Hardly seems equitable, does it?

      As a sidenote: Back in the 90s there was a HUGE "problem" with cross border shopping, and that was when the Canadian dollar was in the mid-60s. Canadians went to the US for more selection, and because in the end it still was less expensive. Since then, however, global distribution means there is virtually no selection advantage, and the rate of inflation in the US has far outpaced Canada - Now even with an appreciated relative dollar, American consumer goods are jus ridiculously expensive.

    41. Re:Wait a minute... by alecks · · Score: 1

      13!!!

    42. Re:Wait a minute... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      "The canadian looney is artificially kept "low" by toying with the interest rates index to favor US exports, wich is the buyer of 90% of our exports."

      Seems like a win/win, but on the flip side this means that our corporations have reduced financial power worldwide, and it means that Canadians live "poorer" lives because we have to pay more for global goods and services, and it also makes some of our industries less competitive because they need to buy supplies (like computer equipment) from US suppliers.

    43. Re:Wait a minute... by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Actually, we like the loonie being worth less then the US$ dollar. Especially since alot of our beef, grain, and some produce go into the states, it helps keep our farms, and logistic companies (Truckers) employed.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    44. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No apology on his behalf is necessary. We appreciate the sentiment, but we do realize that most Americans aren't that stupid.

    45. Re:Wait a minute... by gfunk9000 · · Score: 1

      You know, it's times like this I wish the internet came with a "Is he for real?" button. I mean, he's not really that stupid, is he?

    46. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch what your saying there chief. Canada has been living behind the shield of the US for quite some time. If it wasn't for people like GB you'd be speaking German or maybe Russian right now if it wasn't for the US and people who stand up for what they believe in.

    47. Re:Wait a minute... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      the only problem with this is, of course, who else is the states going to buy from??? People who spout this nonsense seem to forget that the canadian dollar isn't actually going anywhere. It's the states that is actually dropping the value of their dollar so every currency(major ones at least) increase relative to the US. Of course, the states benefits greatly from dropping their dollar when other economies back their currency with the US dollar.

    48. Re:Wait a minute... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      Actually, you've just given the worst reason. We send our good quality beef/grain/produce to the states to make money. Then the supermarkets buy the crap (and i do mean crap) from the states to feed our citizens. We have got to be one of the stupidest countries out there. But hey, selling (or in some cases just giving it away) of our raw resources to the states has kept them from getting to pissed off at us and just taking them. Water and electricity anyone?

    49. Re:Wait a minute... by sabernet · · Score: 1

      Let's see ... seems to me Canada was in WWI and WWII as well, rendering your analysis on even the most facile level moot and not a little idiotic.


      Dude, get a life.
    50. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...but then again, what would be of some people without their moms?

      Virgins.

    51. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have to tell you this: american or not, you are a sorry excuse for a human being, and the world doesn't really need your kind."

      Ah, but as an American, he is probably a "born-again Christian" and everybody knows from very recent history that born-again Christians can get away with just about everything, even lying, stealing and total ignorance (not to mention being close associates of Ahmed Chalabi!).

      Just ask that "born-again Christian", Kenneth Lay of Enron fame and his good friend George Dubya Bush of presidential fame and they will confirm that, yes, in the contemporary USA, a "born-again Christian can indeed get away with ANYTHING!!!

      Truth, honesty, knowlege and wisdom are just minor inconviences that can easily be overcome by persons such as "Kenny Boy" and his good friend "Dubya Boy" if they have enough "faith"! /sarcasm mode off/

    52. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the calibre of response you can expect from Americans (of which I am one, BTW) looks more like this.

    53. Re:Wait a minute... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      Back in the 90s there was a HUGE "problem" with cross border shopping, and that was when the Canadian dollar was in the mid-60s. Canadians went to the US for more selection, and because in the end it still was less expensive

      Actually, by 1993 or so cross-border shopping and negative trade balances with the US wasn't a problem anymore (it was an election year and barely registered compared to Meech Lake Accord, gov't patronage, defecit, Quebec separatists, etc). The problem came to prominince in the late 80's and peaked around 1990.

      And the high dollar did in deed have an impact--it was about 85 cents US when the problam was at its worst, and after the 1993 election, recession, separatist referendum, etc etc the dollar plunged in value into the 60s. Now with a bit lower dollar plus NAFTA things are better for our exporters. However the dollar got so low that it hurt is in global competition as import-dependent businesses were hit hard in the bottom line. It seems generally accepted that with our economic conditions a dollar in the mid 70's in US cents is the best balance, although other factors (taxation, oil prices, gov't policy, etc etc) can affect that balance point.

    54. Re:Wait a minute... by papaTango · · Score: 1

      so instead the American corporation Walmart opens stores across Canada (you do know we have Walmarts here, right? The idea of Canadians driving to the US to go to Walmart seems pretty bizarre),

      Not when the WalMart in the US is 40 miles closer to the town in question than is the one in Canada. And yes, I know there are WalMarts in Canada, but you do know that that's not the issue, right? The tax you pay when you go home to Canada is.

      which we fully allow

      ...except in Vancouver, for example. But that's not the point, either.

      and patronize,

      Your choice, remember. I normally choose not to, BTW.

      and yield millions across Canada which they drive back home. Hardly seems equitable, does it?

      Do you mean when you compare it against what Irving stations in America and your other exports (salmon, for example) bring back to Canada? And how much corporate tax and other fees does WalMart pay in Canada?

      As a sidenote: Back in the 90s there was a HUGE "problem" with cross border shopping, and that was when the Canadian dollar was in the mid-60s. Canadians went to the US for more selection, and because in the end it still was less expensive.

      "The economies of Canada and West Germany ... experienced brief booms when tax rates were reduced in 1988 and 1989 respectively, but Canada slipped into recession in early 1990 after reversing course with surtaxes and a new sales tax." Source: "Marginal Tax Rates" by Alan Reynolds US border towns boomed during that period because US sales taxes were significantly lower. Soon after, Canada made up for this "problem" in large part by increasing import taxes.

      Since then, however, global distribution means there is virtually no selection advantage, and the rate of inflation in the US has far outpaced Canada -

      Whether distribution is global or not makes less difference to sales volume than does the amount of overhead costs, including tax burden.

      US inflation rate 2002: 1.6%
      Canadian inflation rate 2002: 2.2% (est.)

      Source: CIA Factbook - I'm open to a better reference, if you have one.

      Now even with an appreciated relative dollar, American consumer goods are jus ridiculously expensive.

      ...when you add the Canadian taxes, surcharges, and fees, yes.

      Trade between us is not the issue, my friend; it's the taxes on that trade that is. (At least it seems that way to me, after visiting New Brunswick for the past 40 years.)

    55. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fine example of the American education system at work!

    56. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the preceding posters should apologize since most of this thread now consists of nothing more than nationalistic bullshit

      ~ jus cause u code donut mk u cool

    57. Re:Wait a minute... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see you formulate a reply in french. Eh!

    58. Re:Wait a minute... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      The standard of living in Canada is no worse than in the US. Our salaries are generally lower, but it's on-par with the cost of living.

      I live in a house that's worth 120,000 CDN. This same house across the border would sell for twice as much. A lot of things are cheaper in canada (ask any US car dealer!). Of course, some things sell for about as much as in the US (once converted), wich is what an earlier poster meant when he said that things from the US are usually very expensive for us (eg, gas price for example).

      Concerning gas, they pay double and a half of what we pay here. But their salaries are much higher too.

    59. Re:Wait a minute... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      The canadian dollar once was worth more than a dollar 5 cents US:

      (Sorry about the french quote: google it buster!)

      Immédiatement après l'annonce faite par le gouvernement de la mise en flottement du dollar canadien, le taux de change s'inscrivit en hausse rapide, gagnant quelque 5 %, pour se situer aux environs de 0,97 $ É.-U. Il poursuivit sa progression durant tout l'automne 1970 et au début de 1971, s'échangeant dans une fourchette relativement étroite de 0,98 et 0,99 $ É.-U. En 1972, le dollar canadien se négociait à la parité avec le dollar américain. Il atteignait un sommet de 1,0443 $ É.-U. le 25 avril 1974.

      (Taken from http://www.banqueducanada.ca/fr/dollar_livre/full_ text-f.htm )

      The gist of it: april 24th 1974, the Canadian dollar was worth 1.04% US dollars.

    60. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight. They actually pay Canadians in Canadian dollars? And not the other money? Oh migod!! I'm going to have to sit down and reflect on this for a while!

    61. Re:Wait a minute... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean when you compare it against what Irving stations in America and your other exports...

      I was being facetious. That's capitalism and commerce, and it's just a fact of life that there are pluses and minuses (sort of like how Hollywood bitches about "runaway" productions by the [foreign owned] production companies. They don't seem to complain when those "foreign" locations add billions to the take every year). Pointing out that Vancouver is fighting Walmart is absolutely inane unless you're going to point out every California town fighting Walmart -- that isn't national protectionism. ...when you add the Canadian taxes, surcharges, and fees, yes.

      Firstly, the US has import levies just like Canada does, and the GST tax is equally applied whether you buy the product here or there -- it's a total non-issue. Secondly, I'm not talking about cross-border shopping (where such fees apply), but actually going and staying in the US on business - everything from a tube of toothpaste to a dinner out costs an absurd amount from what I'm used to here, and that's before even taking into account the exchange rate. This has absolutely nothing to do with border fees or GST.

    62. Re:Wait a minute... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      Irak?

      Is there some worldwide stupidity epidemic or something? Can anyone spell anything now?

    63. Re:Wait a minute... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Nao posso falar frances, mas acho que falo portugues mais ou menos fluentemente.

    64. Re:Wait a minute... by rednox · · Score: 1

      Gas prices are generally higher in Canada than in the US.

      According to the DOE, as of May 31st, the average retail gas price in the US was $2.051 USD per gallon.

      The gas station I drove by this morning in Toronto was selling gas for $0.85 CAD per litre. It was a lot more, around $0.95 a couple of weeks ago.

      With the financial exchange rate and unit conversion rate, we are currently paying $2.38 USD per gallon for gas.

    65. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming "Texax" means Texas, let's compare.

      Canada 3,851,806 sq miles
      United States 3,717,810 sq miles

      Quebec 594,860 sq miles
      Alaska 570,374 sq miles
      Northwest Territories 452,652 sq miles
      Ontario 412,582 sq miles
      British Columbia 366,255 sq miles
      Nunavut 313,818 sq miles
      Texas 261,914 sq mile
      Alberta 255,285 sq miles
      Saskatchewan 251,700 sq miles
      Manitoba 251,000 sq miles
      Yukon 190,594 sq miles
      Newfoundland 156,185 sq miles
      New Brunswick 28,354 sq miles
      Nova Scotia 21,425 sq miles
      Prince Edward Island 2,184 sq miles
      Rhode Island 1,045 sq. miles

      Not only is Canada larger than all of the United States of America, but Texas is not even half the size of the largest US state, almost half of Canada's provinces and territories are larger than Texas, Canada's largest province is larger than Alaska, which is more than twice the size of Texas, Canada's mid-sized provinces are almost as large as Texas, most of Canada's provinces are larger than most US states, and all Canada's provinces are larger than at least one US state.

      Your welcome to try to bomb us. Maybe you will find the WMD you couldn't find in Iraq.

  2. Sticky karma.. by the_rajah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess that bad karma is pretty sticky. Even selling their preferred A-1 shares to Baystar didn't save them.

    My Canadian friends are screaming bloody murder. I don't blame them.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Sticky karma.. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Insightful? This has nothing whatsoever to do with SCO stock.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Sticky karma.. by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it is really the karma that is to blame. Maybe they were just using SCO software to begin with :).

      We all know it's so good that linux just had to steal from it to become enterprise-ready. RBC surely must've used it!

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    3. Re:Sticky karma.. by tokaok · · Score: 0

      Maybe they were just using SCO software to begin with :). you mean linux?

    4. Re:Sticky karma.. by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      My Canadian friends are screaming bloody murder. I don't blame them.

      Tee-hee, I'm not. My company, in a rare move of prescience, did our direct deposits early, on Friday, because the 31st was a monday. They understand the need for weekend fundage, so we got it early. What I'm more amused about is my rent payment, which I made on monday, and this error is only affecting balance updates, not the actual transactions. The money is still in my account as of now, so I really hope they skip me. :)

    5. Re:Sticky karma.. by bee-yotch · · Score: 1

      Well I guess that makes two of us. My mastercard payment successfully went through for over a grand but somehow disappeared yesterday. My balance is now that much larger than it should be :-). At least I'll get the $0.0002 of interest even when they do correct it ;-).

    6. Re:Sticky karma.. by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      you mean linux? Hmmm... good point. that was dumb. I keep forgetting that they actually were caldera at one point in time.

      No, not linux. Maybe that UnixWare thing? Or OpenServer? Or maybe microsoft paid them with windows licenses for their contiuned litigation, so that's what they run?

      Funny thing is - I checked them out and found that they are violating SCO license. I mean, we all know that SCO owns unix and recalled the AIX license, and yet they are using AIX on their website!

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    7. Re:Sticky karma.. by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      This is still RBC. They'll overcorrect for the interest, then eventually refund you the overcorrection if you call to bitch about the $0.02 missing from your account.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    8. Re:Sticky karma.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      As much as I hate Royal Bank, I hate CitiFinancial even worse. What a bunch of fucking con artists.

    9. Re:Sticky karma.. by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      Lets make that 3. My Visa payment went in, and then the money showed up back in my account. Go team! I guess I should have put more on my Visa ;).

  3. That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As an employee of Interplay, I can say that a 1 or 2 day delay in pay is nothing at all to worry about.

  4. Instability? by lancomandr · · Score: 1

    I think its interesting that major important systems can still fail so miserably in this day and age. Seems to happen all too often.

    --

    "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

    1. Re:Instability? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      What software were they using that caused this? I did RTFA but it didn't seem to say.

      It's just like crashed cash machines - the old ones which were essentially hardcoded worked fine. It's not at all unusual to see bluescreens or error dialogs on the new ones because they install a full OS on them which is completely superfluous.

    2. Re:Instability? by lancomandr · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of stuff they use. But seems that such a huge banking system would have some sort of procedure to fall back on, be able to reimplement the old software until the new stuff was fixed, etc.

      --

      "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

    3. Re:Instability? by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      as they say, the higher you fly... the longer you fall. or something like that.

      In your post major is the keyworkd. Maintaining and upgrading larger systems becomes quite difficult with difficulty being some function of the size. And the function is by no means linear, in fact, it grows quite fast until it becomes virtually unmanageable.

      When I read this post, I had a sudden flashback ot a recent AT&T wireless fiasco. Same thing - too large of a system to manage, to many spaghetti soultions (procrastination and irresponsible management didn't help either, but it was quite bad even without them). At least be thankful it wasn't your heart pacer that was being upgraded, and it wasn't something that flies...

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    4. Re:Instability? by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been saying that to IT people for years. While security is important, having a sound disaster recover plan is even more important. Your system cannot be 100% secure; it's practically impossible. It can be 99.99999999% secure, but that one time can still happen, and you had better be prepared for it.

      I've seen too many IT people focus entirely on security, and forget about having a sound backup strategy. Those IT people need to get fired. Sure, playing with Arcserve or Backup Exec or whatever sux, compared to finding some new hash algorithm to further encrypt your ssh session, and let's face it, we all like learning new things, but IT isn't about that kinda stuff.

      I've had yelling matches at my last employer with IT people; they insisted on not having ANY FTP server, were farting around with NDS, yet when we asked them for a restore from tape, every time there was an issue. They had a 100% failure rate on their backup tapes.

      There's too many retarded IT people out there. and too many retarded IT managers out there too.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  5. Coincidence? by qorkfiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Coincidence, maybe, that England's air traffic control goes down during a software upgrade, and then the same happens to the Royal Bank of Canada?

    Paranoia keeps you healthy!

    1. Re:Coincidence? by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now you know where the old wisdom "Never touch a running system" comes from.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Coincidence? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Funny
      Paranoia keeps you healthy!
      Until you get aluminium poisoning.
    3. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Echelon is not exactly a small system. It has bugs. Give us some time to work it out.

    4. Re:Coincidence? by Sabalon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess that means it's back to beta for XP SP2

    5. Re:Coincidence? by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      no, no coincidence at all. Both were using ScoWare.

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    6. Re:Coincidence? by scruffy_minds · · Score: 1

      They probably forgot to flip the switch back to "More Magic".

      --
      "It's a puzzle, Miss Scully..."
    7. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe that the eventual poisoning is the real reason why they sell you only aluminium foil when you ask for tin foil.

    8. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks

    9. Re:Coincidence? by fuzzhead · · Score: 1

      Awesome

    10. Re:Coincidence? by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Regarding upgrades in general, after an upgrade is done, what is involved in rolling back to a previously working incarnation?

      However, if new software works for an interval and then crashes there may be tons of new features that got used, generating tons of data that previous editions have no understanding of ... If a rollback occurs, the new data would have to be quarantined and ... well it gets very icky.

      The moral of the story may be logs. Every action should be logged at the highest level.

      I write software that deal with tons of data and I occasionally install new versions but logs would be prohibitively expensive compared to the value of the data. Still, I am considering designing data update routines that revolve around loggable actions. The data access procedures are analogous to instructions of a reversible action programming language. Then all data changes can be rolled forward or backward.

      I can see all the trouble of sequential changes. Some people having seen certain values in the data reacted and caused more values to enter the database but due to a bug must now try to reverse their decisions. If the bug is independent of the data values, a rollback, bug fix, and roll forward, and all is well. But if the data changes on a roll forward there would be big trouble.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  6. Obligatory ... by Scooter[AMMO] · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Let the SCO jokes begin! This kind of story is a god-send for /. hecklers.

    --
    "There is no knowledge that is not power"
  7. Affects not just RB customers by forgetmenot · · Score: 5, Informative

    This affects a lot of people - even if you don't bank with Royal Bank but your employer does then you will be affected. The HR manager where I work sent out a bulletin today that should apply to anyone affected by this situation:

    ----
    All financial institution are on line with this issue, mortgage or automatic debit payments, will be honored, should anyone be charged interest , advise your bank,the Royal Bank will refund the charges.

    All financial institution will advance cash based on an employee presenting a pay stub, they will not advance the full amount of the pay stub , they will however provide cash for the weekend.
    ----

    1. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hahaha

      Yesterday I was navigating through another CA bank's IVR, only to hear (something along the lines of), "If you are making a payment to your Royal Bank VISA your payment will be honoured and we are working with them to resolve the issues they are having).

      I had a good laugh. the Royal Bank of Canada is nothing short of a greedy pigopoly and deserves any grief they cause themselves.

    2. Re:Affects not just RB customers by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's their limit on "cash for the weekend?" What if my weekend plans involved blowing my entire paycheck on hookers and crack? Or spending the whole time in a casino playing high-stakes poker?

      Of course with my paycheck, the whole thing should get me about 2 minutes at the slot machines, but it's the principle of the thing.

    3. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm pissed as hell! Goddammned incompetent RBC does it again!

      I deposit my cheque May 31st. I make two transfers from my chequing account to my Visa and my Savings. Come today, there's no money in my Chequing account! I look at the transaction history, and there's no trace of the deposit I made, or the transfers. Strangely enough, the money I transfered out of the savings account is still in the chequing account. They were supposed to fix this when? two days ago? I went into the main branch here in Vancouver and they told me they wouldn't be finished with their transaction backlog until next week. I hope they get sued. Canada's largest bank, and crappiest. I'm taking my money elsewhere!!

    4. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Royal bank is too stupid to hold my money. (and I have family who work for them) In the past 2 years I have had many problems with their service (including having some transactions be processed twice). Just opened up a TD account a couple of weeks ago, and couldn't be happier.

    5. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What money? :p

    6. Re:Affects not just RB customers by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      Of course with my paycheck, the whole thing should get me about 2 minutes at the slot machines

      Is that what Candians call prostitutes these days?

    7. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      What's their limit on "cash for the weekend?"

      If you pull up to the drive-in window in a Jaguar, it's several thousand pounds (Canadian). If you walk up pushing a grocery cart, you get one of those cool nickels with a beaver (Canadian) on it.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    8. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      Man that made me laugh, people are wondering what I'm smokin.
      Maybe I need some time at a slot machine. Too funny.

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    9. Re:Affects not just RB customers by king-manic · · Score: 1

      What's their limit on "cash for the weekend?" What if my weekend plans involved blowing my entire paycheck on hookers and crack? Or spending the whole time in a casino playing high-stakes poker?

      Well if thats yoru idea of a good tiem, I have a vacation package to sell you. 2 weeks airfare included. Accomadations at a seaside beach house in th philipines. All the umm.. company you want, good food. Did I mention beach.

      For 5000 CND.

      Crack extra.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    10. Re:Affects not just RB customers by reidbold · · Score: 1

      maybe you should save 'yuor' money with ING direct.

      --
      -Reid
    11. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      hahahaha

    12. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have found that this problem seems to be affecting more than just Royal Bank customers. For some reason, Mastercard purchases I made a few days ago haven't made it onto my online statement yet, and they are usually there the next day. Last night while hitting a pretentious bar/club area on Corydon Avenue here in Winnipeg, I was unable to take money out of a Royal Bank machine, CIBC bank machine in 7-Eleven, and a Scotia Bank machine. My account really has nothing to do with the Royal Bank -- it's actually with a credit union. It wasn't until I went to a Credit Union bank machine that I was able to access my drinking money. (For the record, that's for the purchase of Canadian Beer and decriminalized pot)

      I don't deal with the Royal Bank because they are totally a corporate greed kind of establishment. They close bank branches in small towns and in less affluent areas, and are still the most profitable bank in Canada because they screw all of their customers with high service charges. I deal with a credit union because it is more in line with my communist ideals, but this screwup has somehow managed to affect me anyway.

      I don't think this problem is specifically a Royal Bank thing, but a screw-up that is affecting electronic banking in Canada over all.

    13. Re:Affects not just RB customers by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      The opposite of progress is... Congress

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    14. Re:Affects not just RB customers by dhalgren99 · · Score: 1

      If you're pissed off with RBC, I highly recommend going to PCFinancial!

      No limit on deposits, NO fees! It's great!
      And you get PC Points when you shop at Loblaws (supermarket)! And you get higher interests on your savings than with the other banks!
      Plus, you can use any and all CIBC ATMs with no charge!
      Check them out: http://www.pcfinancial.ca

    15. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where do i sign up? and you better have some high quality dutch genetics as well as some cared for outdoor sativas from the locals.

    16. Re:Affects not just RB customers by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      I second this. I still do not understand why people PAY a bank to make money off of their savings and get interest rates below inflation. I'm suprised RBC is still in business, then again, it might be that $15 they charge to close your account!!

    17. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but can you trust a Dutch owned bank?

    18. Re:Affects not just RB customers by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      While I would say that going to another bank is a good idea, if your employer uses RBC it wouldn't have helped much.

      I'm an ING Direct customer myself, and I'm still waiting for my paycheque.

    19. Re:Affects not just RB customers by MRK · · Score: 1
      it's several thousand pounds (Canadian)


      Canada uses dollars, not pounds.
  8. Same as British Air Traffic Control? by GeneralTao · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Second major system to go down due to software upgrade in as many days. Coincidence?

    --
    --- Tao
    1. Re:Same as British Air Traffic Control? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity"

    2. Re:Same as British Air Traffic Control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... Yes

    3. Re:Same as British Air Traffic Control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Never attribute to stupidity what can be adequately explained by Microsoft"

    4. Re:Same as British Air Traffic Control? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That might explain the deposit of a 757 on 34R in my RBC account.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  9. They lie.. by hookedup · · Score: 4, Informative

    I deposited a money order at an RBC branch on the 2nd of june, they told me it would take 12 hours. it still has not been put in my account, same with my pay from today.

    At least I have real reason why my rent is late this month..

  10. Oh no! by devphaeton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    had their direct deposits delayed by a day or more."

    Wait till your bank holds onto your payroll checks for 2 weeks.

    Once a bank of mine made an addition mistake, i wrote a pile of checks that all bounced. The bank acknowledged their mistake, and restored funds in my account, but refused to help out with all the check-bouncing fees.

    $25 X 17 Hurray.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Holy crap, $25 an incident, who are you banking with??? You need to escalate your complaint. If your branch manager refuses to budge, contact the district manager, and so on. Eventually, somebody will will be willing to do something and you'll get your jack back.

    2. Re:Oh no! by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

      Did you try suing?

    3. Re:Oh no! by hackerjoe · · Score: 1

      You got screwed. You should have been able to get refunds for the NSF fees and letters of apology to every person who tried to deposit your cheques, saying it was their fault and not yours. Unfortunately getting this out of a bank can take a bit of cajoling, but it's usually possible. They screwed up and tarnished your reputation -- aren't they big enough to take responsibility for their mistakes?

    4. Re:Oh no! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something like this happened at my company with the direct deposit so I understand you situation but shouldn't you have made sure that you had the money in the account before you wrote the check?

      I know it's a common practice to float a check, you take in to account that the check will take X days via us mail, it will then take x days to post, my paycheck will go in to my account in X - y days so I'll be fine.

      Just because it's common practice doesn't make it right. At some point you have to take responsibility, you singed your name to that check and said that at from the date on this check forward I have the funds in my account to cover it.

      I'm not trying to be an troll or anything, I just think that you share a part of the blame for your checks bouncing.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Holy crap, $25 an incident, who are you banking with??? You need to escalate your complaint. If your branch manager refuses to budge, contact the district manager, and so on. Eventually, somebody will will be willing to do something and you'll get your jack back.

      I once had a bank (Crestar, now acquired by SunTrust I think) that intentionally arranged the checks from highest-to-lowest so as to maximize the bounce fees. That way, the $1.53 check I wrote before my $200 bouncing check generated a bounce fee too. Once I had $125 in fees but if they had processed them in the order I wrote them it would have only been $25.

      I agree about the escalation. I did, and eventually they refunded all but the one $25 bounce fee.

    6. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem: he said it was an acknowledged "addition error" made by the bank.

      The fault is quite clearly the bank's, assuming that's all there is to it. It is not the account-holder's obligation to teach the clerks to add.

    7. Re:Oh no! by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      He did have funds in his account. The bank screwed up and *thought* he didn't. But he did. It's the banks mistake.

    8. Re:Oh no! by Pedersen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've got to defend him in this case. He said an addition mistake occurred and was made by the bank. Now, if he does his part, reconciles his account monthly, etc, then he has no reason to believe that things failed to occur as he expected them to. For instance, consider this:


      June 1, he has a balance of $1,200 ready to pay his bills. In fact, he even confirms with the bank that he has this much money, and no outstanding checks/debits to his account. He does so ($700 rent, $150 phone, $50 cable, $75 electric, and $200 groceries to get the whole month's staples). That means he's spent $1,175. Now, the bank does an addition error. Let's say the first check to get to the bank is the cable bill, and their error is to add a 0 at the end of the check, meaning he just paid for $500 worth of cable. Second, in comes the rent, at $700. There's $1,200 out of his account. He has made zero errors here, but he will now be hit with insufficient funds charges for the groceries, and for the electric. And the elctric company and grocery store will also add their own charges on top of it. Some companies will run checks through repeatedly until they clear, incurring further insufficient funds charges from the bank and from the company. Furthermore, the grocery store is likely to stop taking his checks because of this.


      No errors on his part, the bank screwed up, but he gets hit with all the penalties. He did what he was supposed to do, what more could he do?

      --

      GPL made simple: What was my stuff is now our stuff. If you improve our stuff, please keep it our stuff.
    9. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, read the fine print when you sign up for an account. They will fix mistakes, but wont pay out additional expenses caused by their mistakes.

      Bank of America has this deal where if you accidentally overdraft your chequing account, they'll automatically pull from your savings or money market account to cover it so you wont have fees. I figured that was a great idea, and signed up for it.

      Long story short, they didn't set it up right, and one week I got nailed with 4 $30 overdraft fees. The real pisser is that they were for stupid little charges, like me buying a pack of cigarettes or topping off my tank with my debit card. I went in with all my paperwork in hand to fight the charges, saying "look, I set this up on such-and-such a date and you screwed up so take off the charges.."

      Then they pull out the fine print which basically says "the customer is to pay for our fuckups".

      So I withdrew the $50,000 I had in the money market right then and there and wen't to another bank. I also cancelled the mortgage I was just about to sign with them (the money market was the down payment) and went to Wells Fargo instead.

      My advice is find a smaller local bank. A smaller bank would have never let that happen, when you threaten to pull out that much cash and scrap a loan that big, it actually has an effect. BoA couldn't care less.

      Unfortunately Canadians don't have that option. They get to choose from Royal, CIBC, Scotiabank, and Bank of Montreal. There are a couple others I can't remember right now. They all have the same rules and rates so you're fucked wherever you go. There are a few little credit unions around, but it's not like the privatized system in the states, and are limited in what services they can offer.

      Yay socialism.

    10. Re:Oh no! by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      If you live in the US, and those were traditional paper checks, you have legal recourse. If those transactions were EFTs, you're out of luck.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    11. Re:Oh no! by vicviper · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I once had a bank (Crestar, now acquired by SunTrust I think) that intentionally arranged the checks from highest-to-lowest so as to maximize the bounce fees. That way, the $1.53 check I wrote before my $200 bouncing check generated a bounce fee too. Once I had $125 in fees but if they had processed them in the order I wrote them it would have only been $25.

      I agree about the escalation. I did, and eventually they refunded all but the one $25 bounce fee.


      Do not write checks for funds that you do not have. It should not matter that you wrote the checks in one order or another. Perhaps you should use these fees to remind yourself not to write bad checks.

    12. Re:Oh no! by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada we have "credit unions" which are the same as small local banks for all intents and purposes. I used one for a while until I started moving around too much and needed a bank where I could always find local branches.

    13. Re:Oh no! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Just because it's common practice doesn't make it right.

      No, what makes it right is that's how the banks themselves work. If he did do this (which he doesn't admit), he's simply following by example.

      In fact, what makes it right is that's EXACTLY how new money gets printed. Yup. New money gets flushed into the system from nowhere each time someone does this. I can explain if you'd like... :-)

      Keep floating the cheques. You're keeping the economy moving. (But be smart enough to be reasonably sure you can pay them).

      >I'm not trying to be an troll or anything, I just think that you share a part of the blame for your checks bouncing.

      The minute the banks share their part of the blame for becoming the money printers rather than the federal government, I think I'd agree.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:Oh no! by saforrest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately Canadians don't have that option. They get to choose from Royal, CIBC, Scotiabank, and Bank of Montreal. There are a couple others I can't remember right now.

      TD Canada Trust is another big one. The Dutch bank ING has been doing a lot of business in Canada in the last few years too.

      Yay socialism.

      What does this have to do with socialism? Hell, if Canada were more capitalistic, the government would have allowed the major banks to merge, as they've been asking to for years, and there would be less consumer choice.

      Does the U.S. have an equivalent for the CDIC?

    15. Re:Oh no! by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That happened to me once because a teller made a mistake upgrading my account.. money that was supposed to be cleared wasn't.

      After spending 15 minutes tracking down the error.. the bank refunded the NSF fee it charged me and asked me to present reciept for the fee charged by my landlord. The refunded my landlord's fee and provided a letter of appology stating that it was all their fault.

      If your bank refused to do that then I suggest you find another bank.

    16. Re:Oh no! by Yankel · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately Canadians don't have that option. They get to choose from Royal, CIBC, Scotiabank, and Bank of Montreal. There are a couple others I can't remember right now. They all have the same rules and rates so you're fucked wherever you go. There are a few little credit unions around, but it's not like the privatized system in the states, and are limited in what services they can offer.

      Yay socialism.
      Not quite. Royal Bank is a publicly traded company. RY-T (Toronto Stock Exchange).
      --
      --- Dan
    17. Re:Oh no! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Yep. BofA is really ticking me off lately. My wife had a couple of checks from an individual that she deposited but they didn't clear. Now BofA holds checks from individuals for weeks at a time before crediting the funds. We called them one time and the checks had cleared a week earlier and still weren't credited to the account. They also hold cash if it accompanies personal checks. We're moving to Bank One this weekend. I have a small account with them and they treat me like I'm actually a valued customer! Imagine that!

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    18. Re:Oh no! by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      They screwed up and tarnished your reputation -- aren't they big enough to take responsibility for their mistakes?

      Exactly. My roommates work for a small auction house, and the owners were in the Dominican (!) when all the paycheques bounced. Causing rent cheques to bounce, etc., etc.

      Luckily they came back, fixed the problem, and paid everyone's fees.

    19. Re:Oh no! by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 1

      Does the U.S. have an equivalent for the CDIC?

      http://www.fdic.gov/

    20. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aren't necessarily talking about "floating" a check. I'm sure many slashdotters have web access to their account info, so it might be difficult to remember how it was before (or maybe you've always had it and don't know how it was in the old days), when you had to wait for the end of the month to get the status of your account. So without it, a bank error like this could very easily go undetected until the NSF notices come in, which could be weeks before the next statement.

    21. Re:Oh no! by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I have good credit. Thus If I over draft on my checking account the banks will cover me for that amount, up to 1,500 extra. Also, my banks will also cover any check I deposit for an amoutn of 5000, so when I deposit a check I can access the money right away, even though it's actually help for 5 days, the bank extstends me the credit to cover the checks.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    22. Re:Oh no! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the federal gov't regulates this behavior of banks, it is allowed and encouraged BY the federal Gov't

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    23. Re:Oh no! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Before I had access to my accounts online I would call the bank and ask them what my current balance was....

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    24. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so good about checks. Haven't been used Finland for 25 years or so. I just mean that the situation could have been avoided if he hadn't used cheques in the first place.

      There's always atleast two airplanes airborne full of check every day (in US.). What a waste of money...

    25. Re:Oh no! by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 1

      Any bank that I've ever worked at that makes this type of error (encoding an extra 0 to the amount in the MICR field) would fix it and refund any/all fees.

    26. Re:Oh no! by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Similar thing happened to me with Bank of America, they bounced my payroll check on no less then 3 occasions for no apparent reason costing me hundreds of dollars in bounced checks and many hours of inconvenience getting them all sorted out. I still can't write checks at some places thanks to them.

      Guess why I don't bank with them anymore? :)

    27. Re:Oh no! by Pedersen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Way to ignore the whole point of the example. Bank made an addition error. GGP's bank made an addition error, and refunded diddly squat when they screwed up. Possible addition errors resulting in similar outcomes: Applying the same check twice, turning $700 rent check into $750 rent check, applying an NSF fee to his account which was meant for somebody else's account, etc. A more basic one might be holding a deposit for two days for some reason (but not informing the customer), and still applying checks which were written based on that deposit (I've had that happen to me, too). Maybe you are getting the point now?

      --

      GPL made simple: What was my stuff is now our stuff. If you improve our stuff, please keep it our stuff.
    28. Re:Oh no! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I had a simillar problem with my bank's online bill pay service. Because my bill was applied to the wrong account. The bank paid the late fee when they corrected the account.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    29. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If your bank refused to do that then I suggest you find another bank.

      Sadly, unless you're keeping tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in their bank, they are not likely to give a shit if you take your business elsewhere. At least with an American bank.
    30. Re:Oh no! by gmack · · Score: 1

      Sadly, unless you're keeping tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in their bank, they are not likely to give a shit if you take your business elsewhere. At least with an American bank.

      Who cares what the bank does after your gone? I'm ssaying find a bank you like and ignore the rest. If your getting good service there is no reason to worry about the other people who don't care enough to switch. BMO treats me properly .. I don't care who uses what lame bank that doesn't do the same.

    31. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I had a problem with my credit union after they're overdraft protection system failed to cover one of my checks. They took care of everything and gave me a written apology.

      Yay for credit unions!

    32. Re:Oh no! by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      I would suggest that you insist on a written apology. Next stop, small claims court for $25 per NSF charge, plus court costs.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    33. Re:Oh no! by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      grocery stores take cheques? what country are you living in????

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    34. Re:Oh no! by hearingaid · · Score: 1
      They were waiting for you to take them to small claims court, which you should have done.

      Then you should have changed banks :)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  11. Somebody should get fired by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just hope their programmers aren't unionized. Heads should roll for this one. In cases like this, you should be lucky if you aren't held 100% liable.

    --
    Dark Nexus
    "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    1. Re:Somebody should get fired by sfjoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just hope their programmers aren't unionized.

      I hope their programmers ARE unionized. If not, you can bet who the scapegoats will be, regardless of whether they are actually to blame.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Somebody should get fired by Tielman · · Score: 1

      Easy to say, but it's not always IT's fault. It could be outsourced to a provider and they failed to handle the upgrade correctly causing downtime.

      Heads shouldn't roll if the vendor (who was doing the install) didn't do their job.

    3. Re:Somebody should get fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked in some financial institutions, I realize that they hire many incompetent programmers (full-time or contract). But we can't jump to conclusions here. It can easily be caused by managers and directors who tried to cut corners, push schedules, etc.

    4. Re:Somebody should get fired by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 1

      Sure they should. Just in that case, it should be heads in the vendor's company.

      --
      Dark Nexus
      "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    5. Re:Somebody should get fired by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, this is management's fault. The only time a programmer fails is if something wasn't delivered on time, or they just don't produce, or their stuff doesn't make it past QC. Then fire them.

      If bad code makes it into the wild, then somebody signed off on it. Somebody cut corners on testing. Somebody decided deadline is more important than quality. Somebody insisted it had to run the newest Microsoft code.

      That somebody is the programmer's boss.

    6. Re:Somebody should get fired by Rude-Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd bet on managers pushing through the update before it was ready.

    7. Re:Somebody should get fired by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Heads should roll for this one.

      But are the "correct" heads going to roll?

      >In cases like this, you should be lucky if you aren't held 100% liable.

      If you were suppose to be held liable, do you think anything would change? Were any Professional Engineers held liable for the big blackout last year?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    8. Re:Somebody should get fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dear god I hope you never write critical code.

    9. Re:Somebody should get fired by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      I can't tell how old this article is, but it indicates that RBC was an IBM customer. WebSphere MQ, whatever that entails. It is a multi-platform product according to this page, and they have a Linux version as well as an XP version. I guess the multi-platform part comes in at the client level.

      Depending on their support package it might mean RBC's IT department won't catch all the heat for this.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    10. Re:Somebody should get fired by CrezzyMan · · Score: 1

      RBC has lots of vendors. 10 years ago it was 100% IBM. There's still lots of IBM, especially in the backend, but there's now lots of Dell and Windows in the front-end (branch and office) areas. Windows, Solaris, UNIX, other OSes all run various applications. Homogeneous it ain't.

      --
      ->www.chuma.org, ranting and Newtons, what more could you want?
    11. Re:Somebody should get fired by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I just hope their programmers aren't unionized. Heads should roll for this one. In cases like this, you should be lucky if you aren't held 100% liable.

      Not unless it was the programmers fault. The only errors that I'd consider it fair to hold them liable for are purposely tainting the code, or absolute incompetence (Not a missing break statement, but more like "Oh, you mean an int isn't for floating point math?").

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:Somebody should get fired by TheWizardOfCheese · · Score: 2, Informative

      LOL

      Never mind your confused ideas about capitalism ("unions are the source of all evil") - it's your ideas about capital institutions (banks) that have me laughing.

      Ever wonder why a bank needs about a million years and 2 million wankers to do anything? Why everyone spends more time in meetings talking about doing things than actually doing anything? It's so that if something goes wrong, everyone will be at fault. That's useful, because when it's everyone's fault, it's really nobody's.

      If any heads roll, it will be because of political scores to be settled, not actual misdeeds. Oh, and you can forget about your silly daydream of "100% liable" - as a bank customer, you can't afford what it would cost to hold individual employees liable. What would you charge for a contract that had the following terms: be perfect, gain 100,000; make a mistake, lose 100,000,000? Only the institution can afford to cover liability, and that's because the risk is spread over many employees. It's the same principle as insurance.

      --

      "The good reader is a rarer swan than the good writer."
    13. Re:Somebody should get fired by lemortede · · Score: 1

      Its hard to say who should get the Axe. truth is the
      programmers can try to predict everything, get what they think is infallable code, and some nitwit will do the one totally unexpected, unpredictable thing that will crash your code. The other thought is that this upgrade was being upgraded on some faulty code to begin with. You cant always sort out the bad code that you ahve built on. Why do you think MS keeps starting from scratch?

    14. Re:Somebody should get fired by afidel · · Score: 1

      I can almost guarentee you that WebSphere MQ was NOT the problem. MQ might be a little complex to learn but the code is rock solid stable and tested. The majority of the worlds financial transactions probably pass through MQ, and I've never heard of a serious problem being attributed to it. To give you an idea of how stable it is a search for websphere MQ crash only returns 888 documents from google, using quotes brings it down to zero!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Somebody should get fired by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unions are the source of all evil? No, they're not. They're just a hefty chunk of it, being in industries they have absolutely no business being in, and having far more power than they ever should have. The amount of times I've seen incompetent people who don't deserve what they're getting payed get raises because of unions makes me sick. Unions should only be involved when the workers are ACTUALLY being abused, and not when they're just whining.

      But back on topic.

      Frankly, whoever is responsible for this, should be held accountable at least to the level of losing their job. In any PROFESSION (programming is NOT a profession, it's a job), the person responsible would be held completely liable. Yes, insurance would probably be there to cover the monetary costs (and if not, well, expect personal bankruptcy), but that person would never be able to work in that profession again, at least not in the same province/state/country/however far up the ladder the profession is administered. THAT is realistic, as it DOES exist already.

      Doctor found liable for a patient's death? Can't practice medicine there anymore. Lawyer disbarred for something? Can't pratice law there anymore. Get it?

      That kind of system should be in place for any "critical" system, including anything that deals with life and death (not applicable directly to this discussion, but worth mentioning for completeness), or is (as in this case) somewhat central to the smooth (or at least as smooth as usual) functioning of society. SOMEONE should have had to sign off on that upgrade and take responsibility for it. That someone SHOULD have been someone who was actually involved in the process, and not a PHB.

      --
      Dark Nexus
      "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    16. Re:Somebody should get fired by xtal · · Score: 1

      If you were suppose to be held liable, do you think anything would change? Were any Professional Engineers held liable for the big blackout last year?

      There is a difference between being -incorrect- (engineers are human) and being -negligent-. All the engineering codes do is insure that the engineer acted compentently - just because things break, doesn't mean the designer is instantly liable. Unfortunately it usually is interpreted to mean that by the general public.

      --
      ..don't panic
    17. Re:Somebody should get fired by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >All the engineering codes do is insure that the engineer acted compentently

      In designing a system that the vast majority relies on yet one part can take down the entire system for mutliple days, do you think that was a compentent move by the engineers?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    18. Re:Somebody should get fired by llefler · · Score: 1

      I'd bet on managers pushing through the update before it was ready.

      More likely it was an underfunded test configuration. If test systems even exist. When systems are upgraded to meet production needs, rarely are test systems upgraded. Test systems tend to be 'trickle down' systems that are no longer useful in the production environment. They never have enough processor, disk space, or the ability to put a production equivalent load on them.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    19. Re:Somebody should get fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, unfortunately Professional Engineers do not get to call the shots. They are told to shut-up or get fired if they point out things that would cost more money to do correctly. Think Challenger, etc.

      Many in the power industry knew the possibilities of such things happening. These days it is the politicians, executives, and attorneys making the decisions. They all benefit. The rest of us suffer.

    20. Re:Somebody should get fired by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >unfortunately Professional Engineers do not get to call the shots. They are told to shut-up or get fired if they point out things that would cost more money to do correctly.

      Yes, its been this way for years. And it is addressed in Engineering ethics. Take note of;
      http://onlineethics.org/codes/guidelines.html

      Engineering is a PROFESSION. You go through a tough acadmeic school, get all sorts of legal rights (stamps/signatures/etc), get a professional certification and have a role in society. Act like it.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    21. Re:Somebody should get fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your so right about hte issue being management.

      But the sad fact is that the programmer is the fallguy for managements screw ups. It doesn't work until it is tested and production is not test. No mater what politicians say, they can't change reality.

      And the programmer is also likely the least paid.

    22. Re:Somebody should get fired by goatpunch · · Score: 1

      This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody. There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job. Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done

  12. Ah, Nostalgia... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Remember back when companies had Q/A departments and procedures? Wrote test plans and tried various scenarios to make sure the software was idiot and bullet proof? When routine software updates didn't suddenly pull your pants down and slap a creme pie into your face? When companies didn't just write any old thing and throw it out there for their customers to actually perform the test?

    Geez, I'm showing my age again...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by koa · · Score: 1

      I dont see why this isn't the case nowadays really..

      Sure, some big company gets burnt trying to cut some corners; I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of companies out there that demand high availability (also the gov't) still maintain policies and procedures for their upgrades.

      Heck, I do. And my employers are rather happy about that.

      --
      ....move along....nothing to see here....
    2. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I dont see why this isn't the case nowadays really..

      It's called "Risk Management"

      Sure, some big company gets burnt trying to cut some corners; I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of companies out there that demand high availability (also the gov't) still maintain policies and procedures for their upgrades.

      The deal is you have companies which now asses the costs of proper testing verses the cost of defending themsevles against their product blowing up and opt for whichever is cheapest.

      There are companies which must maintain a higher standard, by law or existing contract. Unfortunately the trend I've been watching over the years is an acceptable level of incompetence or defects. Manufacturers of PC parts, f'rinstance, are fine with a 15% failure rate off the line. I couldn't imagine such being acceptable with pacemakers.

      Ironically, most of the PC's in the world run on some version of Windows and even XP still loses its marbles on a regular basis. Thanks to the complexity of some products, some companies simply weigh the rist and make a financial decision and some CYA plan for Image Damage Control -- Gee, sounds just like the war on Iraq, come to think of it, it's a pervasive attitude.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by cemaco · · Score: 1

      QA tend to be right behind Help Desk on the chopping block when cuts are made. I know from experience, having done both jobs. What's more likely to have happened is that the QA process was not thorough enough. The usual cause is management pushing for an unrealistic release date, forcing Q.A to cut corners. That was the usual cause in my day. Of course as management used to say to us, if it was left to us the product would never go out the door. Then again, there would be a lot fewer catastrophic failures also.

    4. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by thetoastman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep.

      It's called software release management (SRM) and infrastructure configuration management (ICM). Both are parts of general configuation management.

      According to a Gartner study (I don't have it at my fingertips), over 90% of all failures in mission critical systems are due to poor problem or configuration management. When this study was done, Gartner estimated that only 6% of the major corporations would have industry best practices in place by 2004.

      Hmm - sounds like both the Bank of Canada and the English FAA got bit by this big time.

      This discipline sounds like a great business opportunity. Unfortunately my previous employer disagreed.

      My previous employer also shut down a (formerly) successful consulting organization and laid off 1100 talented individuals.

      I wonder how much the Bank of Canada would have paid for this type of expertise. Of course, the check might be a day or two late . . .

    5. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of companies out there that demand high availability (also the gov't)

      Ha ha ha! I work for the government. Trust me, they'd have to be able to recognize quality before they could demand it. You wouldn't believe some of the things I have to deal with. High availability? Maybe at federal agencies with better funding and the need to handle a large volume of data.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    6. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by koa · · Score: 1

      Maybe your right, maybe people are only making a big deal out of this because it is in the news; and it is in the news becuase the glitch accutely effects a vast amount of people negitivly..

      When average agency A or company B or department X has an outtage due to an "upgrade" it would be alot less visibile to the public if it doesnt cause public havoc. So maybe I was wrong; system stability might just not be what it used to be.

      --
      ....move along....nothing to see here....
    7. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Remember back when companies had Q/A departments and procedures? ..."

      Er, no.

      None of the companies I've ever worked for actually did those things. Wait, that's not true. I remember the first company I worked for, they had a QA department. The president always whined about that, because he never understood the purpose of a QA department. "Developers test their code, right? So why am I paying for a QA department?"

      Anyway, when hard times struck, and the downsizing began, guess which department was the first to disappear.

    8. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by Perrin7 · · Score: 1

      I did QA until I escaped (a la Dilbert) a couple years ago. - Release date set - Development schedule slips - Development Schedule slips some more - Release date is NOT revised - QA fits into what is left of schedule, with no additional resources - Software ships with whatever surprises remaining - Patch - Repeat

    9. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bank of Canada

      That would be the Royal Bank of Canada. The Bank of Canada is a totally separate entity and is in fact run by the government to manage the money supply and interest rates.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    10. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      Sure do, and thank God that's all over with...

      2 year delivery schedules.
      Mountains of management and structure.
      Tons of code and features that nobody ever used.
      Impossible to fix issues after deployment. ...

      All with the invarible result of everyone forgetting what the original requirements were 2 years ago. Lots of money down the drain, and bug free (yeah right) product that is of little use to anyone.

      Gimme frequent changes and only he most basic of testing. Leaves lots of time for adding useful stuff. Sure, something is always busted, but over time, the working feature set grows.

      Does anyone really expect computers to work as expected? As soon as we all learn to embrace the reality, that something will ALWAYS be busted, life get's a lot easier.

    11. Re:Ah, Nostalgia... by SoLoatWork · · Score: 1

      Remember back when companies had Q/A departments and procedures? Wrote test plans and tried various scenarios to make sure the software was idiot and bullet proof?

      No.

  13. Certainly Explains by SLot · · Score: 4, Funny

    why they wanted their money back from SCO. ;)

    1. Re:Certainly Explains by Rupert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone over at Groklaw this morning was claiming that RBoC is the only major Canadian bank not still running OS/2. RBoC uses an OS from a company that's fairly close to Vancouver that is unbeloved of /.ers.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    2. Re:Certainly Explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      RBC, back when the company name was still "Royal Bank" and not three meaningless letters, was very much an IBM shop until around 1995/6. I'm talking PS/2 workstations with OS/2 2.1, Lotus CC:Mail on OS/2 server, 3270 terminals, Token Ring LANs in office buildings still using DB-9 connectors (no twisted pair!), the whole nine yards.

      When they heard from IBM that OS/2 wasn't going to continue past Warp, they brought Microsoft in an redesigned the whole network infrastructure. It was a 3" binder. The mainframes would still be around, but all office and branch systems (except for tellers) would move to Windows, Ethernet, etc. Rolling this out to the branches of course takes longer, but eventually it got done.

      Fast forward to now: last week I had to go to RBC Main Branch to do some banking. I noticed that the old teller systems (which had still ran DOS and used your usual function-key-and-tab-through-the-form interface) had all been updated to... web-based point and click! AKA Windows 2000 workstations. Not that this should have had any impact on back-end batch transaction processing, which should still be done by those Big Blues in the basement. Still... there's still major technology that being replaced, so it feels to me like they're hiding behind this "routine upgrade" crap.

      Did I mention that I didn't get paid today because of this?

      Anyways, about OS/2... many many ATMs (at least in Canada) still run OS/2. Most NCR models still out there still run a year 2000 patched version of OS/2 2.1EE. They used to be powered by NCR workstations with MCA buses - just like those IBM PS/2s. No idea what hardware is in there now. Those bankbook update slots were originally IBM Proprinters with a special feed mechanism. Those OS/2 based ATMs use IBM's Communications Manager/2 software for talking to the backend mainframe. None of this is super-sekrit: just watch an ATM boot up when it eats your card and the branch tech has to reset it. You could see the OS/2 desktop before the ATM interface program took over.

    3. Re:Certainly Explains by AlexCV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Like all the major Canadian banks, the transactional system is on an IBM Mainframe. Running either OS/370 or OS/390. The transactional integrity is handled either with CICS or with custom home-grown software.

      As for OS/2, that was only on ATMs. And ATMs are running anything from VxWorks to System 7 unix to OS/2 to embedded windows.

      Finally, if you're going to cite a comment on a web site, as reliable as that is, please give a reference to it that is more then the URL to the whole site...

    4. Re:Certainly Explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      NCR uses very standard x86 hardware for their ATMs now. A family member works their and sometimes brings home old pieces - pentium 3 procs now IIRC.

      I got to tour one of the Canadian plants when I lived up north, pretty cool to watch them built. I forget what OS they run now though.

      I'm pretty sure TD Canada Trust still runs OS2 on the computers in the branches. Too bad TD sucks.

    5. Re:Certainly Explains by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      RBC did in fact convert the front end system and network from OS/2 to Windows some years back, and the system has been unreliable ever since.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:Certainly Explains by Zordak · · Score: 1
      Finally, if you're going to cite a comment on a web site, as reliable as that is, please give a reference to it that is more then the URL to the whole site...
      According to the U.S. Government Printing Office website, you only need to reference the TLD.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  14. What sytems, what upgrade? by iso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've heard a lot about this here in Canada over the past few days. Does anybody know what systems RBC was using, and what upgrade they were doing? It definitely seems suspicious that they were doing an upgrade at the *end* of the month (May), which is the busiest time for a bank (I know, from having worked at one). Was this really an upgrade gone wrong? Are there any more technical details?

    1. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by khendron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's a quote from Judi Levita, a Royal Bank media-relations officer, explaining what went wrong:

      "I honestly don't know. As I say, I mean, it's one of those tech things."

      Source

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    2. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by skateboard · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, it was actually an upgrade. (Buddy works in the RBFG office with the fellow that screwed up.) I'm told that it was a single-character typo in the command line. Everything seemed OK until the system went on-line with live data. Then all hell broke loose. And my payroll deposit hasn't shown up yet either.

    3. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >typo in the command line
      Sounds like UNIX to me :-)

      Several months ago I lost about 200MB of my old email when moving it from one IMAP folder to another (why the command line instead of IMAP client? it's faster and superior to client-side operation, I thought).
      It was also a single ASCII typo.

    4. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by Alomex · · Score: 1


      That was the OSes fault. It shouldn't be that easy to delete critical data in an OS. Just like it shouldn't be easy to set a Ford Pinto on fire.

    5. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by madman101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't tell you what upgrade, but the backend is on HP Nonstop S Series servers, running a Unix variant.

    6. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by madman101 · · Score: 1

      Who said anything was deleted?

    7. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, at least he's honest.

    8. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by dhalgren99 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but this is even funnier, and sadder, further down the page:

      "I owe them a Visa payment, but this glitch hasn't affected their ability to collect the money that's owed to them," Maria Janchenko, 26, said in Toronto, adding that she had been contacted three times this week by a collection agency.

    9. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man.... All you are seeing are our web servers! ie. frontend, in the DMZ, outside of the firewall. You don't actually think that you can see inside do you?

    10. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Payback time...:-) !!!

      Time to spread a little FUD of my own...:-) ...it was SCO unix, I tell you...there is was, just humming along as usual, when all of a sudden, some idiot, using one of the tellers Microserf Windows XP teller machines, clicked on the "Install virus/worm security update NOW?"...the truly awesome synergy of M$ windows and SCO unix came together to produce a monumental data black hole, unlike anything seen in this universe to date...truly an awe inspiring moment...LOL...imagine it, if you will...hmmm...sounds like a good banner-click ad! "Study shows M$ windows and SCO unix destroys data better than any other systems combined! Order your data shredder today! Available from both M$ and SCO! Limited time offer: Special combo deal: M$ XP and SCO unix for just $699! Read our testimonial from the Royal Bank of Canada! :-)

    11. Re:What sytems, what upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That was the OSes fault. It shouldn't be that easy to delete critical data in an OS. Just like it shouldn't be easy to set a Ford Pinto on fire.

      And just like it can't possibly be a techie's fault, it must be a manager's fault. Funny how this is all working out.
  15. One victim here by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

    I work for a company that got affected by this. Instead of my payroll deposit coming in last night, it will be sometime today, which doesn't affect me as much, but people with automatic mortgage and car payments might get screwed...

    1. Re:One victim here by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Mine's going in on Sunday.

      As well, I'm missing out on the interest I'd have earned today on my RRSP contribution.

      We should have the right to bill them $30 for not getting us our money the same way they charge us NSF fees. A simple apology doesn't cut it. If we apologize to our bank for bouncing a check, do they wave NSF fees? I don't think so! Love the double standard.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  16. Internet on every PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I visited RBC earlier this year to make changes to my retirement plan and I was shocked to see that the account manager used a single PC to manage the accounts and access the internet. When I pointed that out, he said "don't worry, we run the best anti-virus software there is" (McAfee by the look of the icon in the tray). Because, as we all know, it's those viruses that eventually steal passwords and break into the databases. *rollseyes*

    1. Re:Internet on every PC by gss · · Score: 1

      Why is this moded up? Obviously they're not that stupid to access this information over the internet. Don't you think they would be just like every other company and have a private network (intranet). Yeesh!

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. May be that will teach you by BigGar' · · Score: 1, Insightful

    to cut back your lifestyle and save a bit. Even a dollar or two a day can be helpfull over the long haul. Also, if you think that you can't possibly save anything, then you're not trying, you just need to determine what your priorities are.

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    1. Re:May be that will teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to cut back your lifestyle and save a bit. Even a dollar or two a day can be helpfull over the long haul. Also, if you think that you can't possibly save anything, then you're not trying, you just need to determine what your priorities are.

      Even if you saved lots of money, where would you save that money? Most people would have that in a savings account AT THE SAME BANK! How is that going to help them when this happens? It's not about living paycheque to paycheque; if you don't have access to the money you've saved when you need it, then creditors will start calling, your credit cards will stop working, and you won't even be able to access that stockpile of virtual money in your account to buy food.

      All this shows me is that we should maintain a healthy supply of real hard cash at home. Then again, having had someone break into my house a couple years ago and rifle through everything, I'm glad I didn't have any money lying around the house. The insurance will reimburse you, but not very much, because you can't prove that you had that money.

    2. Re:May be that will teach you by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I totally agree. Most experts recommand that you have three to six months worth of funds saved up, which means that delay of payroll check deposit of a day, or even couple of weeks should be non-issue.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    3. Re:May be that will teach you by Bull999999 · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you RTFA, the problem is with the payroll deposit, not with accessing existing funds or credit cards.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    4. Re:May be that will teach you by BigGar' · · Score: 1

      How the hell is suggesting that you save a little bit of money make me a Troll?

      --


      Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    5. Re:May be that will teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you saved lots of money, where would you save that money?

      There are LOTS of solutions, you're just not thinking hard enough:

      - Open accounts in multiple banks (preferrably in multiple countries).

      - Buy and keep traveller's cheques. If stolen, you can get them reimbursed much more easily than cash.

      - Invest some money in bonds and stocks, you can always sell those and get cash.

      You're just blaming the world for your own lack of intelligence and imagination.

    6. Re:May be that will teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my priority now is getting a Master's degree. Try saving significant money during those two or three years. I take it you've never tried that.

    7. Re:May be that will teach you by tricops · · Score: 1

      Man, what's up with the mods today. Two non-troll posts modded troll within a few posts of each other. Oh well, that's /. for you...

      What you said is exactly right, though it's still affecting the existing funds a little as well. My account had been at around $20 but it looks like they rolled some stuff back since it was back up to $50 last I looked...

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    8. Re:May be that will teach you by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Because:

      1. Many slashdotters have big egos.

      2. Your statement shows that charging $2000 gamining machine on the credit card while having no emergency fund saved up is foolish.

      3. Many slashdotters charge $2000 gamining machine (or other cool toys) on the credit card while having no emergency fund saved up.

      4. As stated before, by having big egos, they shift the blame to the credit card companies for providing easy credit and conclude that who ever disagrees with them are trolls that work for the banks.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    9. Re:May be that will teach you by clart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try being fresh out of college. How the hell are you supposed to have 6 months of funds saved up when you've only been working full-time for 2 or 3? I'm sure that will teach those pesky kids trying to pay their rent and student loans for not saving anything up. Bottom line not everyone has that luxury.

    10. Re:May be that will teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you've got a point there

    11. Re:May be that will teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Most experts recommand that you have three to six months worth of funds saved up..."

      Obviously "most experts" make more money than I do. For some (most) people, it's just not that simple.

    12. Re:May be that will teach you by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most experts recommand that you have three to six months worth of funds saved up

      So what do these "experts" recommend you spend during those 3 to 6 months?

      Honestly, if everyone had the ability to just save up 6 months worth of funds then no one would be bouncing checks or investing in short term disability insurance. I had bills before I had a job, no one gave me a grace period to get together some emergency savings.

      I save a pretty good amount, 20% of each check goes straight to savings, but it'll still take me most of a year to get 3 months of backup funds. Someone living on a more hand-to-mouth salary may never get that much saved.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    13. Re:May be that will teach you by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      My best friend's a loan officer and he told me that he has clients who make $100,000+ that comes in to make $2000-3000 emergency loan so it's just about making a lot of money. By contrast, my other friend's mom works as a teacher's aid for special ed kids, and the dad works at a rental center (both rather low paying jobs) and their networth now is about $700,000.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    14. Re:May be that will teach you by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      I've got the money saved up. In a high interest place where I can't get to right away...

      $#%^#@Q^#$%...

      I have enough for groceries, but not much more.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    15. Re:May be that will teach you by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Trying not to sound trollish, but...

      Being fresh out of college, you'd probably want a roommate or two in a 2 or 3 bedroom apartment, instead of living alone. And it doesn't have to be in the absolute best part of town. I'd make sure it was safe, for sure, but it doesn't have to be luxurious. Believe it or not, that's the quickest way to save money - share your expenses.

      It's inconvenient, yes. But in the long run, having roommates for a couple of years will have helped you out alot.

    16. Re:May be that will teach you by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Best of luck to ya. RBC stated that they will pay for NSF fees and other "resonable" charges, so hopfuly, you won't have any pernament financial damage.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    17. Re:May be that will teach you by shepd · · Score: 0, Troll

      >How the hell is suggesting that you save a little bit of money make me a Troll?

      Because it's nearly impossible to do?

      Let's pretend we managed to put ALL expenses on hold. Saving up 6 months of paycheque in Canada, assuming you have an above average salary, will take about 12 months due to the tax levels in this country (there's more than just those percentages, too - many, many, many Canadians pay more than 50% of their income in tax before they see a dime).

      Now, in the real world, you can't live without ANY money. So let's say we managed to cut expenses down to the point where they're half of our disposable income. We now need to wait 29 months (50% of income after tax + 15% sales taxes = 35% disposable).

      To put a dollar amount on it, let's say you make $100,000 a year (if only!). You need to save $600,000 to save 6 months of salary.

      $100,000 after income taxes (50%) is $50,000.

      $50,000 * 12 months = $600,000.

      $50,000 - ($25,000 * 1.15) = $21,250

      $21,250 * 29 = $616,250

      Over 2 years is not reasonable. That's 5% of your working lifetime.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    18. Re:May be that will teach you by Diabolus777 · · Score: 1

      Bull.

      I recommend you have at least a million in cash in your sock drawer. This makes most problems a non-issue.

      What kind of expert are those?
      The people that suffer from delayed pays are exactly the ones that can't afford to save up, and these people are the norm.

      The RBC makes billions in profits each year. This should have never happened. It did, now pay for it, hang your head in shame and feel very sorry.
      Nothing excuses that.

      --
      We should have been
      So much more by now
      Too dead inside
      To even know the guilt
    19. Re:May be that will teach you by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say RBC wasn't a fault but shit does happen and you should be prepared for it. It's funny how people have money for video games, booze, SUVs, and phat stero systems but never enough for emergency savings.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    20. Re:May be that will teach you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that you should have some money saved up, but what about people who keep their money in a different account. I keep that majority of my money in an ING savings account (2.5 percent interest), and just move what I need into my RBC account when payments are coming out (mortgage, car, insurance...). The RBC account only offers 0.05% interest. Why the hell would I keep my money there?

    21. Re:May be that will teach you by chiph · · Score: 1

      That's the difference between high income and high net-worth individuals. I'm working towards becoming the latter (it's a long slow process). A book I found useful is: The Millionaire Mind by Dr. Thomas Stanley (same guy who wrote the bestselling "The Millionaire Next Door").

      Most technical people fall into the category he calls "big brains, no bucks". This includes professionals like doctors & dentists, who are very knowledgable in their field, but don't know how to manage their money..

      Chip H.

    22. Re:May be that will teach you by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      The advice that's usually given is to save 6 months' living expenses, not 6 months' gross salary. So if you make, say, $10k a month, but $5k goes to income tax, and of the remaining $5k, you could get by on $2k if you really had to, then you're looking at saving $12k. Not $60k. The idea is that if you lose your job or something, you have enough money to pay the bills for 6 months while you look for a new job.

      The other thing to remember is that having 3 months of expenses saved is better than nothing. One month is better than nothing. Don't just give up completely because someone you've never met sets an expectation that seems (or is) impossible to meet.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    23. Re:May be that will teach you by BigGar' · · Score: 1

      Even having a few hundred extra to cover you for a few days in the event of a delayed paycheck is better than nothing. Consistantly relying on a paycheck to arrive by a certain moment just to get by is foolish. If you can't do that sell some of your shit and pay off your damn bills. Eat out once or two times less in a month, rent a couple of videos instead of going to the movies, walk or ride a bike instead of driving a car or car pool if you have a long commute. I'm not saying that you have to have 6 months expenses saved up and I understand that it's possible to get twice in a very short period of time and when you get hit it can be tough to recover, but if you're not at least trying then I've got no sympathy for you.

      --


      Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
  19. I Need My Pay by Tr0mBoNe- · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a Royal Bank customer too... fortunatly my company uses CIBC, so I went down to the bank on my way to work this morning with my paystub and left with my pay, and all my funds from my account. I closed it and gave my financial buddy at work a new account with CIBC.

    Honestly though. Being a software developer and knowing the development cycle like the back of my computer leads me to wonder how in the world they didnt test it fully. I mean... comeon guys. And that kind of institution using SCO's brand of UNIX? face + palm

    Oh well... i dont care anymore... i close the accounts and visa card and when they asked me why, I just said: "I can't trust a bank that can't deal with this kind of glitch."

    --
    while(1) { fork(); };
    1. Re:I Need My Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's crazy. They actually asked you "Why"??!?! What the hell they think is the cause why hundreds if not thousands of people are closing their accounts right now?

      I've closed all my accounts with RBC four years ago. Never looked back.

    2. Re:I Need My Pay by Tr0mBoNe- · · Score: 1

      Yeah... now that I look back, I should have done it a while ago too. But I kept it because all the bank machines in my town are RBC, and BMO.

      I was too pissed to read into what the manager actually said. The guy in there before me tore a strip off the poor guy too... It kinda reminded me of the drill sargent in Full Metal Jacket.

      --
      while(1) { fork(); };
    3. Re:I Need My Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a Good Thing! If they ask "Why" and the customer tells them exactly why, the reasons are put on record. This means that, come next annual shareholders meeting, they can't fudge things, blame it on some competitor's special offer or whatever, it's all there in black and white.

      Every business should ask "why" when losing an account, and every customer should answer honestly. Anything less and it creates the kind of lousy "don't care until we're in chapter 11" atmosphere we are in right now.

      Really, it's one thing to be critical, but your complaint is not just pointless, it's downright destructive BS.

    4. Re:I Need My Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Consider switching to President's Choice financial since you're with CIBC already. It's run by Amicus (who owns CIBC) but the difference is they don't charge any fees. You can use any Amicus or CIBC machine and interac for free plus you get points towards groceries at Great Canadian Superstore or Lawblaws (out east). I've banked with them for a year now and it's awesome. I pay for $1 coffees with my bank card without a care in the world.

    5. Re:I Need My Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've got the ownership of CIBC and Amicus reversed

    6. Re:I Need My Pay by Tr0mBoNe- · · Score: 1

      yeah my parents use that.

      i've heard good things.

      oh well... back to work.,

      --
      while(1) { fork(); };
    7. Re:I Need My Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It kinda reminded me of the drill sargent in Full Metal Jacket."

      Just FYI:
      http://www.historychannel.com/mailcall/mailc all.ht ml

      Ermy Rocks.

    8. Re:I Need My Pay by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Careful, I closed my accounts with them a while back, and I've been to the branch 3 times to cancel everything, and I'm still getting VISA statements from them!

  20. Gotta love the Canadians... by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    http://www.bash.org/?148851 Not to mention the exchange rate.

    1. Re:Gotta love the Canadians... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about Canada's exchange rate though. Look at the Purchasing Power Parity of our money compared to US Dollars. If you look at small ticket items; $10, Canadian prices are favourable. A Big Mac meal is $5 in Canada and it's $5 in America. That means Americans are paying C$8 for something we pay C$5 for. As you move into larger items, the PPP ratio dwindles. Look at a Canon Eos for example. To buy from Canada it's $1300. In the US it's $899. In C$ that's $1250... The PPP ratio diminishes, especially when you add shipping. Still, a large sum of consumer spending is on smaller items. In many ways, we're much better off than our American cousins.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  21. Just like the suits by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    And people wonder why I've become so incredibly disgusted with standard capitalism: "I owe them a Visa payment, but this glitch hasn't affected their ability to collect the money that's owed to them," Maria Janchenko, 26, said in Toronto, adding that she had been contacted three times this week by a collection agency.

    It's their fault that these people aren't recieving paychecks and they're still hassling them aobut paying bills?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Just like the suits by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't get contacted three times by a collection agency for being one day late with your Visa payment.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Just like the suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone who trust a bank is a complete fool.

      Banks will do ANYTHING to delay posting your deposit as they make money off those floating funds.

      Banks and Loan Sharking/racketerring are indetical, except the bank has a license from the government to do it.

    3. Re:Just like the suits by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, if she's been contacted THREE TIMES this week about payment, then she's at LEAST 2 months overdue. Going to blame the other 2+ months on the computer glitch that started on Monday? Besides, their Visa bills aren't actually DUE until about 7 working days into the month, so if she was up to date, then her payment wouldn't even be due yet.

      No, that's just somebody who thinks the world owes them everything taking the opportunity to complain because it might get them something they don't really deserve.

      --
      Dark Nexus
      "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    4. Re:Just like the suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with capitalism and everything to do with a poorly run business.

    5. Re:Just like the suits by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      What is your point? They don't send these things out to a collection agency until you've been past due for a while. Which means she was already late in paying the bill before the computer glitch happened. Which means that if this computer glitch didn't happen, they would STILL be calling her. Just that now, she has an excuse to make them wait a few more days.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    6. Re:Just like the suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you could, if for some (highly unlikely!) reason the bank had a computer glitch, and sent your account to collection by mistake.

      Of course, we all know it's impossible that a bank would ever have a computer glitch.

    7. Re:Just like the suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except if you're in Canada of course. Things are different here.

    8. Re:Just like the suits by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      It is not their fault that the bank glitched out, and who knows what the other factors are causing problems (illness/unemployment/etc/etc)? Yet you blame the person rather than the computer/company. Welcome to your automated world that best suits beaurocratic nerds.

    9. Re:Just like the suits by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 1

      For TWO MONTHS? And that's a minimum. RBC handles it's OWN collection at one month overdue. A collection agency wouldn't be hired until at least 2 months.

      If it's illness (bad enough to cause them to not be able to afford $30 for a minimum payment) for that long, then they should be on disability leave. For unemployment, they shouldn't be racking up credit card bills.

      Yeah, I DO blame the person in this case. This computer glitch has absolutely NOTHING to do with this person being called by a collection agency. Odds are the contract was already given to the collection agency BEFORE the glitch occurred.

      And even if - and this is a major stretch - that wouldn't have happened without the glitch, then arrangements would have been made on the FIRST call from the agency, as they were surely notified by the bank about the difficulties.

      95% of the evidence points to this person being a deadbeat who will blame ANYBODY but themselves for their current troubles.

      --
      Dark Nexus
      "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    10. Re:Just like the suits by nostriluu · · Score: 1


      Regardless of what *might* have happened, the bank screwed up and it is one more straw on the camel's back. The fact is institutions screw up all the time, and it is a more human oriented position to give the benefit of the doubt to the person rather than the organization. After all, finance is just one tiny aspect of our existance, unless you only value money and somehow can't see the rest of the factors that keep society healthy, including people who might not be the best fiscally but might be vital parts of their community otherwise.

      And no, I'm not personally a "deadbeat," but I've met plenty of great people who weren't great at paying their bills or just had unforeseen circumstances hit them at the wrong time. I'm in their court, even if they're not always right.

    11. Re:Just like the suits by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 1

      The fact of the matter is that the bank is not responsible for the person already being overdue on their payments, but it's being used as an excuse now.

      Frankly, I'm not very good at getting my bills payed on time either. I know this. I also know for a fact that RBC calls you to tell you that you're overdue at ONE month. That's a pretty strong reminder, and "I'm not so good with bills" isn't an excuse after that point, no matter HOW bad you are with bills.

      I'm in the person's court if there's a remotely reasonable chance they're right. In this case, I don't see any real chance, no matter how remote or reasonable.

      --
      Dark Nexus
      "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    12. Re:Just like the suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, no one, and I mean NO ONE gets contacted by a collection agency for missing 1 payment by a few days (in fact, not even weeks or MONTHS in most cases). This asshole is a fucking deadbeat, who was not paying any bills regardless of whether her pay was a day late or not(or a week late for that matter). I would bet my testicles that all of her credit is on collection, and has been for a good long time. I worked for one of the "big 5" for years (not RBC), and trust me, collection is the last place banks want to send accounts. They basically sell a bad debt to an outside company for pennies on the dollar, and let the collections people try to get what they can from the deadbeat. The credit issuer does not get more money if the debt is collected.

      Now, for the Visa part. RBC does not issue the Visa card, Visa does. Yes, all banks (well most)have an affiliation with either MC or Visa, but all applications are screened by Visa or MC, NOT by the banks. They do not share the same systems any further than the ability to post payments, and receive payments. So, yes, Visa could get payments from your account (or at least request them, if you had set up automatic payments). Also note, RBC Visas were working the whole time AFAIK, again showing these systems are not dependant on each other.

      Do not shed any tears for this bitch, she already dug herself a huge hole, and the collection agencies had probably already heard all of her excuses, including "but my direct deposit did not go through" in the past. Also, RBC was allowing its customers to withdraw money, even if the balance could not be confirmed, if the deposit holder could show their paper DD stub.

      Got bad debts, cry to someone who isn't busting his nuts to pay off his own debts. These assholes love to spend money they haven't earned yet, and then they try their best to never pay the debt. Then you and I get to pay HUGE interest rates to cover the risk that these cocksuckers create. Fuck them, they deserve to be hounded by collection agencies, they should be thrown in to debtors prison.

    13. Re:Just like the suits by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      Bank screwed up. Person harmed. This isn't a way of judging the person's previous record, it's a one time examination of a bank screwing up.

      Maybe it's just my rant lately against the beaurocratic nightmare we've created that rewards smarmy, manipulative behavior, but in any case I certainly don't advocate taking a statistical view in the way individuals are treated whenever it can be avoided. Possibly because I'm not personally a bank and know that money is not a really great system overall.

      Anyway, have a nice day. :)

    14. Re:Just like the suits by hearingaid · · Score: 1
      Actually, you'd be surprised.

      At one point earlier in my life, I was in school, with an RBC student loan. (I know - it wasn't my choice, though. Evil provincial government. Evil, evil evil.)

      They lost my I'm-in-school form. They had my correct address, and phone number, but didn't use it. Instead they tried calling me at my mother's place. For SIX MONTHS.

      She kept on telling them I wasn't here, and trying to tell them I was in a DIFFERENT PROVINCE, but they wouldn't listen.

      Eventually, I come home for Christmas. They call me then, and threaten to send the account to a collection agency. I'm like, "Uh guys - I'm in school. Don't you guys send letters?" And they're like, no, policy changed and now we only make phone calls. So anyway.

      Moral of the story - if she'd come up to visit me for Christmas, I'd never have spoken to RBC and they would have sent the account to an agency. Dimwits.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  22. This is why by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I don't keep all of my money in a bank, I've never had the hole in my back yard, under the oak, next to the stream, 5 steps from the bush refuse to give me a withdrawal. Well, except for that one time the stream flooded.

    Sure, I don't earn interest on it, but at least I have some in an emergency

    1. Re:This is why by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope the emergency you refer to doesn't happen to be the flooding of a certain stream, because then you're really fooked =)

    2. Re:This is why by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I don't keep all of my money in a bank, I've never had the hole in my back yard, under the oak, next to the stream, 5 steps from the bush refuse to give me a withdrawal."

      Is that the blackberry bush or the raspberry bush? Never mind, I think I found it.

    3. Re:This is why by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, treasure hunt!

    4. Re:This is why by arf_barf · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of how my wife's grandfather buried a fairly large chunk of cash/gold during WWII and then spent the rest of his life looking for it :-)

    5. Re:This is why by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      "Sure, I don't earn interest on it, but at least I have some in an emergency"

      And you think other people get interest on money in the bank? Especilly a checking account?

    6. Re:This is why by iabervon · · Score: 1

      next to the stream

      I thought you didn't keep your money in a bank...

    7. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep my money safely tucked under my tinfoil hat, where the aliens cannot find it.

    8. Re:This is why by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Heh, er, yeah. Interest bearing checking accounts are common (at least, in the US they are).

      Not that I suggest relying on interest from a bank checking or savings account. It doesn't even beat average inflation.

    9. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I don't keep all of my money in a bank, I've never had the hole in my back yard, under the oak, next to the stream, 5 steps from the bush refuse to give me a withdrawal." Is that the blackberry bush or the raspberry bush? Never mind, I think I found it.

      Be sure to bury a slip of paper that says "Funds Not Available". ;-)

  23. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yes, because increasing the load on their webserver will CERTAINLY increase stress on their banking mainframes!

    From the sounds of it, it's not even REMOTELY a load issue in the first place.

  24. Linux to blame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when you lose your SCO license to use linux and have to install Windows! Owning SCO was a sweat deal to avoid linux licensing fees.

  25. apt-get install bank-upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, Lou, you're in the unstable branch! Gaah!

    1. Re:apt-get install bank-upgrade by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Judging by the crazy angry teller at the RBC around the corner from me, I'd say I've definitely been in the unstable branch.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  26. Double Withdrawl by CHaN_316 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I made my credit card payment via online banking on June 1st, and the transaction went through. However, on June 2nd, the system decided to pay my credit card again a second time. Now I'm down a few hundred bucks.... should be fun getting this sorted out :|

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
    1. Re:Double Withdrawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar problem. All of my Interac transactions were doubled up. And None of my paychecks went in. I talked to the bank they said that the ATMs will only provide me with the present incorrect balance in my account but is should be sorted out by monday. But now I have to wonder if I am going to get double billed on everything. In a situation like this NSF checks are a real problem I mean I don't know about anyone else but no paycheck and double withdrawls I don't carry a large enought buffer to deal with that.
      Also in the aftermath I am sure a couple double transactions will get missed and the bank will make some money off it.
      All I can say is I am glad I am not on their IT Team. Something tells me they get to work all weekend and no Hockey for them this weekend...

      GO FLAMES GO

    2. Re:Double Withdrawl by CHaN_316 · · Score: 1

      Good point about the NSF cheques (Canadian eh?). Say cheques starting bouncing because of this glitch, and credit cards aren't paid, electricity bills, etc... I wonder if that'll affect your credit rating. That would be an unfair side effect. I'm sure THAT will be fun to sort out as well.

      --
      "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
  27. Partial Deployment Possible? by gmletzkojr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't typically work on these all-or-nothing type of systems. I usually work on embedded controllers, so we have the ability to put, say 10 units into the field for trials. Given the English air troubles and now this, isn't there a way to deploy a system such as this where it can be tested with real-world loads but not be the only system in use? Our controllers are not placed directly on the assembly line on the first day out, just for this purpose.

    --
    I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
  28. Banking Hazards by TaddS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently got an overdraft notice on my bank account, four days after depositing my paycheck, in the branch with a teller. After several days of wrangling with their phone customer service and various managers at the bank I finally found out what had gone wrong: the teller had entered the wrong account number into the computer and someone recieved my money in their account. After several more forms and a couple hours of waiting around in the bank they finally got me my money back, but this was after being without cash or check-card for a week. All this because someone, whos job is to be exact, typoed.

    I'm sure if this had been their money they would've gotten it back in less than 7 days, and levied some hefty time and inconvenience charges.

    --
    -"Nice jacket, who shot the couch?."
    1. Re:Banking Hazards by thebra · · Score: 1

      I had the same thing happen. The person had changed a 1 to a 7. I called the bank, they told me that it would take 3 days to research the problem. After hanging up the phone I found the receipt and noticed the problem. I called the bank help desk and told them I had the receipt and it showed what account it had actually posted to. Once again they told me it would take 3 days to research. Why? I had the account number it posted to. I hope they fired the person that screwed this up.

    2. Re:Banking Hazards by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I finally found out what had gone wrong: the teller had entered the wrong account number into the computer and someone recieved my money in their account.
      Hate to be a troll, but if you go to the bank teller, always ask them for a receipt and double-check your account numbers on that receipt. Yes, the teller shoulders some of the responsibility, but so do you.
      --
      Corporate Gadfly
      Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
    3. Re:Banking Hazards by CarrionBird · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would disagree. Yes you should double check, but doing thier job is 100% thier responsibility.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    4. Re:Banking Hazards by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      There are several sources to blame.

      1) System design - All account or ID numbers should be a multiple of 11. This check catches the two most common data entry mistakes - wrong digit and transposed digits.
      2) The teller obviously
      3) You - for not having a little extra because you live check to check.

      In fairness, if it weren't for #3 you may never have noticed the problem and you'd be out quit a bit if you don't keep your own records and check the balance from time to time.

    5. Re:Banking Hazards by Misch · · Score: 1

      Learned that the hard way. I won a scholarship which was paid directly to me as a check. I took the check to my bank, which happened to be the same bank the check was drawn from. Instead of depositing the check in my account, they deposited the check into the account the check was drawn on.

      I noticed it a couple of weeks later when I made a withdrawl, and the ATM reported my balance being less than I thought it was.

      I still had my receipt and saw that they put it in the wrong account.

      Two days later, I got a written apology from the bank, and a correction statement. The neat thing? The correction statement was a little yellow form that said "Bank Error: Deposit $500", much like the Community Chest Monopoly card that says "Bank error in your favor! Collect $200!"

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    6. Re:Banking Hazards by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just curious, but what do you do for a living?

    7. Re:Banking Hazards by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      but this was after being without cash or check-card for a week.

      Anyone who lives cheque-to-cheque deserves the misery they receive.

    8. Re:Banking Hazards by TaddS · · Score: 1

      The account number on the written receipt was correct, the teller incorrectly entered that number into the computer, and since the last four numbers were the same, the computer printed reciept had information that seemed accurate.

      --
      -"Nice jacket, who shot the couch?."
    9. Re:Banking Hazards by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I would disagree. Yes you should double check, but doing thier job is 100% thier responsibility.

      I would disagree. You should always double-check, it *IS* your money after all. The person doing their job is *human* and therefore prone to make some mistake at some point, somewhere. I'm seeing more and more of this attitude of entitlement that people have these days. Everyone is somehow supposed to offer you complete accuracy, and perfect service, or you scream bloody murder. 100% all the time is a worthy goal, but it is not realistic. You are part of the system whether you want to be or not, and you have to take responsibility and participate. That's the burden of being alive and on this planet. Feel free to explore other options if this displeases you.

    10. Re:Banking Hazards by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Yes.. and the bank will cover the fallout from the mistake, to a degree.

      Their liability in that regard cannot be limitless, however.. go look at your contract.

    11. Re:Banking Hazards by TaddS · · Score: 1

      It's not like I have a choice in the matter. If I could get a job which allowed me to save up money for rainy days I'd have it. However, I don't have that luxury, and on top of having a low paying job I have medical bills, food, and rent that takes a fair amount of what I earn.

      --
      -"Nice jacket, who shot the couch?."
    12. Re:Banking Hazards by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      Everyone makes mistakes. If I make a mistake, it's my fault, not my customers for not catching it sooner.

      Also, I am not part of any bank. They don't pay my salary. I am an external entity. And if they do not meet my expectations, I at least expect them to not punish me for it.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    13. Re:Banking Hazards by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      I'm another saying they have to get it 100% perfect, but that it's 100% their problem if they don't. Don't penalise anyone else for your error.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    14. Re:Banking Hazards by ozbird · · Score: 1

      I thought bank account numbers included a check digit to catch typos, or does this vary from bank to bank?

  29. I can see it now... by j0eshm0e · · Score: 5, Funny

    junioradmin@rbchost:/> rm -rf core *

    waiting

    waiting

    thinking...this is taking longer than it should

    phone rings.

    ctrl-| ctrl-| ctrl-| ctrl-|

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Tr0mBoNe- · · Score: 2, Funny

      [ $[ $RANDOM % 6 ] == 0 ] && rm -rf / || echo "You live"

      thats a fun game to play as an admin at Canada's largest bank.

      --
      while(1) { fork(); };
  30. Re:Their refusal to remove the fees... by symbolic · · Score: 1

    ...would make me wonder how many other customers were victims of this kind of "mistake". They made money off the deal.

  31. Credit damage by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I love that.. any reasonable costs. How about the cost of damage to someone's credit when a payment can't go through... are they going to write a million credit apology notices? Are they going to write paper letters so you can keep a copy when someone calls into question your credit? The credit system is very damaging in these cases and has no easy fix.... I recommend all people go their RBC branch and get a letter explaining why payments were missed. Have them give you as many registered copies as you need for all your creditors affected.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    1. Re:Credit damage by twbecker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, if your credit is significantly damaged by a few payments being a couple of days late, you had shitty credit to begin with. It usually takes several missed payments before a creditor will report you.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:Credit damage by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      >I recommend all people go their RBC branch and get a letter explaining why payments were missed.

      Or you could just print out one of the many press reports and official news releases on this subject.

      Oh wait, this is slashdot. Sorry. Carry-on with the overacting dramatics.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:Credit damage by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Valid points. Though credit shouldn't be a mystery and your rating should be something you are aware of. When it comes to mortgages though... a missed payment may be a big issue. It is something worth confirming with the bank and your creditors.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  32. SCO Unix by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Funny

    They tried to upgrade to Linux but they didn't pay the $699 license fee!

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  33. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for RBC. Just another reason to ditch this company like a bad habit. Take head, insert directly up ass, do not remove. Story at 11!

  34. As a Canadian and a RBC customer... by PhilippeT · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can guaranty that they will not spend 2 seconds finding out if all those overdraft charges and this charge that they are putting on us customers are to be refunded. They will instead wait till people come in one at a time to have them removed... how many people wont bother 1000, 2000 so lets say that's 5$ a head that's 5000$ to 10000$ of extra earnings for the bank.

    --
    A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    1. Re:As a Canadian and a RBC customer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you expect them to do? Give all customers a $20 discount as a token of apology and an effort to keep them?? That would make them look like they actually care. We couldn't have that now, could we??

  35. 16bit! by dfltr · · Score: 3, Funny

    i bank at RBC, and i have no money in my account right now. and it's my girlfriend's birthday. and she hates the present i got her. and my dog got run over by the bank manager... if i had a dog he would have anyways. it turns out that _some_ of the transactions from the weekend actually did go through, like the ones from my account, so when they reapplied everything yesterday i got double-debited for everything and it emptied my account. whee. fun side note: if you walk into a Royal Bank branch, you'll notice that the terminals behind the counter are running 16bit windows apps. check it out frank, we got this great new version, it's For Workgroups!

    1. Re:16bit! by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      the terminals behind the counter are running 16bit windows apps.

      Check it out. They run Windows 3.1 apps in compatability mode under OS/2. So do the ATM's - they use exactally the same PC as the tellers do, but without the plastic case.

      I used to be an IBM CSR who'd get calls to come fix things at 16:00 on a Friday before a long weekend. The thing had been broke all week, but no one called because the customers didn't complain enough :(

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:16bit! by CrezzyMan · · Score: 1

      I think they are juuuust starting to move the tellers over to Windows. The tellers at Main Branch in Toronto all have new spiffy mouse-driven interfaces. They used to have text DOS interfaces.

      --
      ->www.chuma.org, ranting and Newtons, what more could you want?
    3. Re:16bit! by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Those were AS/400 telnet sessions.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:16bit! by Qwerty4 · · Score: 1

      You were probably looking at the monitor connected to the Frisco Bay "Estimated time standing in line" teller queue system. They still run Windows 3.x (could be 32-bit NT 3.51) and they always have the monitor sitting behind the tellers facing the public.

      The systems that are actually used by tellers are all 32-bit Windows. Even the RBC ATMs run an embedded version of Windows NT (I forget if it was an NT4 or 2k error dialog I saw once).

  36. Who Scheduled this upgrade? by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nice planning: an end-of-month upgrade at a financial institution when, by their own admission, transactions are at their peak.

    Maybe they thought they would broaden their QA testing base to, say 20,000,000.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Who Scheduled this upgrade? by eggoeater · · Score: 1

      Yup... I work at one of the largest banks in the US. We have change black-outs at the end of the month. I had to delay a change from last Thursday to last night because of this. It's also a huge no-no to make a change over a holiday weekend although I guess Canada doesn't observe memorial day. However I'm not a mainframe guy, which goes by different rules. I think there are some changes on main-frames that (for whatever reason) must happen at the turn of the month.

  37. Re:Busiest time for a bank by Tielman · · Score: 1

    That depends on the type of Bank you worked for. May certainly is no different for us than any other month. Then again, general consumer accounts aren't major for us.

  38. The scary thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is that after several days they still don't know what the problem is!

    "The bank says millions of transactions, from direct pay deposits to bill payments, have been affected by an unknown computer error. "

    This could be anything from a simple bug to a disgruntled programmer.. industrial espionage.. etc.

  39. wtf are you talking about. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, whoever signed off on the code and said "it's ready to go" are the ones who fucked up. I mean I suppose you could have a situation where the actual production environment was vastly different from the development/testing one, but I find that doubtful.

    Really, there's all kinds of blame to go around, and programmers deserve some of it, the system never should have been so brittle as to cause these kinds of problems in the first place.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:wtf are you talking about. by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      Really, there's all kinds of blame to go around, and programmers deserve some of it, the system never should have been so brittle as to cause these kinds of problems in the first place.

      Right, so the system administrators are to blame. :)

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    2. Re:wtf are you talking about. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This is what Quality Assurance is for.

      In a serious production environment, the developers should NEVER be the ones that sign off on something before it goes live.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:wtf are you talking about. by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could have a situation where the actual production environment was vastly different from the development/testing one, but I find that doubtful.
      We have that at out place. Development is different from User Testing and both of them are different from Production. Bosses don't see that it's a problem worth doing anything about.

      --

      ---
      We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

    4. Re:wtf are you talking about. by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I used to work for a financial services company, and the prod env *was* different than the test env ( which was different than the dev env ).

      Irksome no end.

      On blame,

      QA deserves some of the blame, they should not have blessed it, and their tests should have caught major problems.

      The development team deserves some of the blame, they should have unit tested for this, and should have made sure that QA had whatever information they needed to check it before blessing it.

      Management probably deserves most of the blame. I can only imagine that it was they that developed the schedules ( probably not realistic ) that the development and QA teams had to work within. Probably they that insisted that all features be developed within their timeframe, ignoring whatever pushback came from dev and QA. And probably they that decided to shorten the QA schedule to allow a bit more dev time ( seen it happen so many times... And I am a dev... ).

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    5. Re:wtf are you talking about. by hearingaid · · Score: 1
      Who signed off on the code?

      That'd be the horde of faceless, nameless MBAs that RBC keeps around. I swear they clone them in a vat somewhere.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  40. Telcos to blame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the strike at Aliant Telecom, or the impending strike at BCE (Aliant's parent company) had something to do with this. There have been scattered reports throught Atlantic Canada about Western Union transfers not going through, and transactions at Revenue Canada disappearing...

  41. I wonder... by TedTschopp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the software was written off shore?

    --
    Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter... Canadians aren't racist like Americans.

    2. Re:I wonder... by tool462 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, it was probably written in the US :)

    3. Re:I wonder... by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      oh, you mean in Redmond, WA?

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    4. Re:I wonder... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the software was written off shore?

      You mean Prince Edward Island?

    5. Re:I wonder... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the software was written off shore?

      Yep, looks like it was written in the USA. (Redmond, Washington.)

    6. Re:I wonder... by mnmn · · Score: 1

      You really dont have to cross any shores to reach the US, unless youre taking that ferry off Toronto across that big lake whateverisitsname.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  42. Big Deal. by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    I never pay my bills on time and ...

    [NO CARRIER]

  43. It must be M$'s fault. by jwsd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why post a bug story on /. if we can't blame it on M$?

    1. Re:It must be M$'s fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, I mean even if M$ wasn't invloved in the problem, we should blame them anyway...right?

      Everybody repeat after me,

      MS sucks, MS sucks, MS sucks,

      OK now everyone put there tinfoil hats back on.

    2. Re:It must be M$'s fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, I know a Microsoft Consultant working on this project, and it is a .NET-related issue.

  44. Poor money management by lordgarth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These kind of things do happen quite often if the banking industry is examined as a whole. If it tends to happen to an individual bank on a recurring basis then the depositors should move their money. I myself have been in the position of living paycheck to paycheck in the past and I've nobody to blame for it but myself. The bank is at fault but if someone cannot survive a couple of days without their deposit going in then they should seriously look at how they manage money. If an unforseen emergency arises then they are going to find themselves in dire straits.

  45. Apologies to Canadian freinds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Soory, guy, we didn't get yer check yet, we'll find what the problem is all aboot."

  46. On the bright side... by Suit_N_Tie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's only Canadian money.

    1. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell modded this 'insightful'... yeah the world loves yankees, becouse of these things..

    2. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG OMG!!! THAT JOEK IS TEH SUPAR FUNNY!!!!!!!!

      afsdfds afsd fsda asdf sfdsdfsdf asdfsf fdsasdf asfdafsd afsdsdf afsdsdf asdfjka ffljawei jfwea jwejwelfkjwalfj kw e fawef wewef f weafwe fawe

    3. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could have I would have. Our damn vending machines won't even take that tin laden crap.

  47. As one who is just making it by I offer this advic by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the longest time I was living from paycheck to paycheck. Compared to my friends I made some pretty good money for being 20 (30K/Yr) but it didnt seem like much when you were living on your own with rent, insurance, car payments, electric, cable, phone, water, and a girlfriend. Its amazing how things add up. It just so happens that I receive the first paycheck of the month on the same day that rent is due. After paying rent I'm left with about $100. It is also convenient that the second and last paycheck of the month is received on the same day that all of the bills are due. After paying them I'm left with $300. Note I havent mentioned the G/F tax yet but that one is expensive.

    Anyway, my tip is, next time you get a bonus, tax returns, some lump sum of money, spend it on next months rent before you can do anything else with it. Trust me on this. If you put it in your savings you can too easily transfer it to checking when you see Wizz-Bang4000 on pricewatch for only $499! I do this every chance I get and it really helps out a lot.

    Now if I could only figure out what to do with the SO.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  48. One-time problem vs. tanking company by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have the couple days delay be on the bank end. Working for a tanking company, where paychecks get delayed further and further till you aren't even sure if you'll get payed next week for the work you're doing now is a much bigger problem. Of course, having it happen right around rent time is a major bummer - but in this case the "It's the bank's fault" excuse is validated.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  49. What are they running? UNIX. by mwillems · · Score: 2, Informative

    HPUX and AIX, at least on their web servers, and no doubt also on their critical systems.

    See nextcraft: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.rbc.c om

    MW

    --

    ---
    BDOS ERR ON A:>
    1. Re:What are they running? UNIX. by DavidChristopher · · Score: 1

      Right.... you think RBC hangs it's $$$$ transactional data out on the web, eh? Think again.

      --
      http://www.bistolas.net
    2. Re:What are they running? UNIX. by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

      why would a majour bank ever run more than one operating system? wouldn't it be much less hassle to standardise on one platform? Especially when both are so similiar (*nix). Just a question from someone whose never admined in their life.

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    3. Re:What are they running? UNIX. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case parent is not a troll, given what happened at RBC, do you really think having only one OS is much less hassle? Should one bad patch bring down every one of your critical servers? Should one security hole affect every one of your servers? Even though HPUX and AIX are both UNIX, they are not the same UNIX. Google for security through diversity.

  50. this just in..... by presmike · · Score: 5, Funny

    a beer drinking beaver was found at the mainframe keyboard typing I AM CANADIAN over and over. More details to follow...

    --
    presmike
    1. Re:this just in..... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, that should be "JE SUIS CANADIEN"

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    2. Re:this just in..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for making a joke that is actually funny instead of the mindless drivel about the dollar or pronunciation that comes from many of our (increasingly embarassing) neighbors down south.

    3. Re:this just in..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, that's brilliant!

  51. What happened to redundancy? by Various+Assortments · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few short years ago, the Toronto Dominion's entire network went down for a whole day. I happened to be visiting a friend a train ride away, and could not get money out to get home out of any machine. It was frustrating, and it made me wonder why my service charges hadn't gone to redundant connections and machines, but I was able to borrow some cash and get home.

    But when it happened a second time, in less than a year, I got a little frustrated and switched to president's choice bank.

    My wife uses Royal Bank, and her pay has not gone through yet and it is now more than several days late. I certainly hope they work later than 4pm, monday to friday, to fix this. Some people who were supposed to be paid on the 31st have bounced their rent cheque!

    1. Re:What happened to redundancy? by MachDelta · · Score: 1
      ...and switched to president's choice bank.
      AKA: CIBC with a friendly logo on it so no one knows they're actually being fucked over by a major Canadian bank like everyone else.

      Isn't commerce fun? :)
    2. Re:What happened to redundancy? by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope they work later than 4pm, monday to friday, to fix this.

      Being an RBC employee sitting about 40 feet away from the people working on this, let me tell you they are most definately *not* keeping bankers hours.

      Of course, I like having a job, so I can't go into any details about the root cause of the problem. But needless to say there are a lot of people working very hard on rectifying the situation.

    3. Re:What happened to redundancy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an RBC employee sitting about 40 feet away from the people working on this, let me tell you they are most definately *not* keeping bankers hours.
      Which however becomes much less significant when spent posting on slashdot

    4. Re:What happened to redundancy? by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm not part of the group working on the problem, so how I spend my time is my own business. See, companies have these things called departments....

    5. Re:What happened to redundancy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not sure why you said "being fucked over".

      AFAIK the differences between President's Choice Financial vs. CIBC bank accounts are more than the logo. Even though it's true that with PCF you are actually banking at CIBC, the accounts they offer are very different. With PCF, the accounts are generally no fee (except things like NSF): no monthly fee, no minimum balance requirement, no transaction fee, interest rate is much higher interest rate, and cheques are free.

      I am glad they exist so I don't have to pay those ridiculous fees normal bank accounts have. I hope they will stay for a long time. (and no-fee. :) )

  52. is this not your greatest fear? by yoha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's makes you wonder what "money" really is, when a software error can make it disappear.

    1. Re:is this not your greatest fear? by tokaok · · Score: 1, Insightful

      money is work that is all, money is just a means to represent work. instead of trading my cow for your virgin daughter. all we are trading is for the value of me raising my cow and yourself your daughter.

    2. Re:is this not your greatest fear? by thelexx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See my sig...

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    3. Re:is this not your greatest fear? by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's makes you wonder what "money" really is,

      Money is a concept built on mutual trust. I trust that the money you give me will be honored at its face value in another place.

      Be it dollars, euros, gold, or matchsticks.

      Money, as such, is meaningless without that trust.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    4. Re:is this not your greatest fear? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Money is a concept built on mutual trust. I trust that the money you give me will be honored at its face value in another place.
      >
      > Be it dollars, euros, gold, or matchsticks.
      >
      > Money, as such, is meaningless without that trust.

      Which, I believe, is the original poster's point.

      As of two weeks ago, any RBC accountholder could take a piece of paper with some RBC-blessed magnetic scrawlings on it, and many people would trust that the scrawlings could be turned into dollars, euros, gold, and/or matchsticks.

      As of today, that's no longer entirely clear.

  53. Upgrade MY ASS! by webzombie · · Score: 1

    Sure, the largest bank in Canada didn't test a system upgrade long enogh to find that this type of massive failure would happen.

    BULLSHIT!

    Something is going on and my gut tells me it has nothing to do will a failed upgrade!

    But you know... maybe a failure of this size is a good thing, especially if RBC suffers significant losses and decides to lay blame else where!

    Maybe businesses will realize that any software company LIKE MICROSOFT - that doesn't offer any type of performance insurance isn't one to be trusted or do business with.

    Last I heard... and I'm Canadian, no dumby, a person not a beer, most RBC debit cards were being refused by merchants who have been told all accounts are currently frozen!

    Dum dum dum dum!

    1. Re:Upgrade MY ASS! by tricops · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I haven't had any trouble using my debit card at any point during this week.... although, they're still screwing with stuff. My payroll from last night still hasn't gone through, and my account is back up to around $50 rather than the $20 it was at a few days ago.

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  54. This is a troll? by Cymsdale · · Score: 1

    Sounds like good advice to me. Does everyone else at /. spend all their money the instant it comes in?

    1. Re:This is a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take off you hoser.

    2. Re:This is a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does everyone else at /. spend all their money the instant it comes in?

      Of course not.
      The government spends most of it.

  55. Charge them daily interest by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    like Credit Card Companies do when you withdraw money from your CC.

    It's only fair.

    1. Re:Charge them daily interest by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Good luck. I had a situation with a credit card that was about 40% my fault. My card was stolen so I got a new one, but forgot to change the account number for my online payments. After 6 months of paying the wrong account and not telling me I was paying the wrong account, the credit card company suddenly forgot how to credit my account. I didn't notice the missed payment on the next month's bill, so I paid the entire amount, so I in effect paid the first bill twice. Needless to say, they cashed the second payment as well without crediting my account.

      This is already a long, tedious story so
      I'll just say it took 6 months to get my $800 overpayment refunded. According to them, because of the "missing" payment, I owed $100 in interest. In actuality, they owed me exactly what they thought I owed them, so I should have received $100 in interest. You may be surprised to know I got nothing, not even an apology.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
  56. Those poor members of the IT department by pbailey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can you imagine working in that IT department right now. My first reaction when I saw this story was that I felt incredibly sorry for those IT guys and gals. Must be hell over there right now!

    I know I always sweat when releasing new software, at least I don't have to worry about effecting the bank accounts of millions of people. That would truly be scary!

    1. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I work at RBC in the IT department and can tell you that there are a number of people who literally have not left the building since the issue started a week ago.

    2. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by PunkPig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The question is though. Was it Royal Bank's IT dept or is their IT outsourced?

    3. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RBC IT...not outsourced.

    4. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by pbailey · · Score: 1

      That's what I figured. Well, I for one wish you guys all the best of luck. Sounds like someone's worst nightmare coming true. Maybe you're one of the lucky people who are not involved in this wonderful joy :)

      Cheers

    5. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Don't believe anything an AC (or anyone else for that matter) posts without verifying it.

      But in this case, I have to agree with this one.

      There are many many high and low level people whom's careers have been severely damaged (to understate the issue). You screw up a production system like this at another company, the worse it can go is the Board of Directors. With a big 6 bank, it gets to the Minister of Finance. During an election. And wanting to merge with other big 6 soon.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    6. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parts of it, at least.

    7. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better get the resume up to date then.

    8. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by tty21 · · Score: 1

      Check out the RBC link in the parent item, there's a link to the careers section. Should be some openings....

      --
      The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dogs back 123456789
    9. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      You shouldn't feel scared if you do it right. It's just that we as a species are so new at software that we don't know what "right" is.

      Do you think architects and builders quake with fear the first time someone walks into a new building because the walls might come crashing down? Of course not.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    10. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RBC has convicted and jailed them so fast?

    11. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late or that.

    12. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I can imagine the hell that would be going on...however, when you guys and gals are working on it...just pass the occasional "..I TOLD you would should have gotten all of that backup gear and hired those extra programmers, but NOOOOO...you said we, one of the most profitable banks around, 'couldn't afford it'..." to THOSE IDIOT PHBs who don't have a clue and don't pay attention when us techies tell them what we need to do the job properly...

    13. Re:Those poor members of the IT department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to take the time and thank the IT staff at RBC. Our questions have been answered and your staff have tried their best to get the transactions completed for June 2, 2004.

      Since our IT shop is very aware of SEV1 outages, you team has been calm and in control.

      One question from my company. What happened to either your BCP and TRP plan??????.

      You guys are doing great... Keep it up, and hopefully the rumours of people being walked out in the last couple of days are untrue. The right people need to be accountable. Not the workers' which are trying to restore service.

  57. I got a FREE donut! by PunkPig · · Score: 2, Funny
    I went to the head office branch on Bay St. in Toronto this morning and they had free donuts and coffee. I have been going to this branch for the last 5-6 years. They never had free donuts before.

    I hope my Visa payment goes through ok...they had to do everything on paper.

  58. Abstract Money by mratitude · · Score: 0

    If it isn't tangible, it doesn't exist. How much value can be placed in data that is nothing more than electrons and magnetic images kept in a media grid of some sort?

    This sort of occurrence perhaps illustrates how some frightenly important industries are perhaps overly reliant on computerization. Perhaps it also illustrates how far removed some industries have become toward anticipating consequences associated to their high cost automation and computation systems.

    I would think that financial institutions would have a reasonable (read that as "hard copy") method to insure such an occurrence wouldn't have this impact.

    --


    Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
  59. They still have Q/A procedures by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    ...they are just written in Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya, Panjabi, Sanskrit, Sindhi, Tamil, Telugu, or Urdu languages

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  60. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'll notice that the terminals behind the counter are running 16bit windows apps.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. If it ain't broke... Remember, it's the upgrade craze that got you into this mess. If they upgraded to 32-bit and all of a sudden you couldn't withdraw money from your account, you'd probably be the first to complain about why they didn't stick to the 16-bit version!

    You fucking whining shit.

  61. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Speare · · Score: 1
    I don't know where you live, but the general rule of thumb is to spend no more than 1/3 of your take-home on rent. If you only have (rent=paycheck+paycheck-$100), then you are probably overspending on rent. Consider your options.

    Also, it's easy to become a packrat without realizing it. SELL, don't toss, your unused items. eBay and flea-market that stuff ruthlessly, every few months. For most things you find in your home, if you haven't used it in 3mo, then you don't need to keep it around.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  62. Math correction. *sigh* by Speare · · Score: 1

    Math correction. If you have two paychecks a month, and (rent=paycheck[1]-$100), this leaves you with (paycheck[2]+$100) for everything else that month.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  63. Thanks by lazyl · · Score: 1

    Short of hacking the bank yourself, posting that information on /. was probably the worst possible thing you could have done with it.

    --
    Aw crap, ninjas!
    1. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      OMG!! You're so right. I never thought that crackers would wait until they see the information on slashdot before acting. Here I was, thinking that a cracker could easily go to an RBC branch and make the same observations, or just spread spyware and keyloggers and get the results.

      Thank you thank you for trying to look smart in such a moronic, clueless fashion. You sir are the Mr. Village Idiot.

    2. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an uber-troll.

  64. North American bank system is BACKWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I immigrated from the Netherlands to Canada and here are the differences:

    1. Cheques? HAHAHHAHAHAH we didn't use them anymore for 15 years. NOT NECESSARY in Europe: you can just 'direct deposit' to everyone. And: NOT necessary to create 'bill payee' lists first - what's the use - just fill in the receivers' details if you want to pay (and yes, of course you can create lists of regular receivers). Also, people can pay ANYONE AT ANY BANK - not just payees who happen to be in YOUR bank's list.

    2. Costs: Canadian banks are utterly expensive. Reason: no competition and he - why innovate or be more efficient when we can RAPE customers by charging outrageous fees for CRAP service. In Holland: crap service as well but you DON'T get charged! Just a very modest yearly FIXED fee.

    3. Savings interest: in Europe it still pays to have savings account (beats inflation). Here in Canada I get 0.0000000001% (MINUS of course all kinds of 'service' fees because (a) I'm blond (b) I go biking 3 times a week (c) I just happen to be a customer who they can rape.

    To give ONE good example that explains the difference. I still have Dutch bank accounts. From here (Canada) - I can use my computer to transfer money DIRECTLY from my Dutch bank account to - let's say - ANYONE in - let's say Greece; and WITHOUT costs. Now try doing that with Any north-American bank; they'll charge you with bizarre fees and the money is NOT in the account of the receiver the same day but instead you will have to wait a week at least. Yea you got a looong way to go (keep on dreaming that USA is the best in everything - take a vacation outside USA some day).

    1. Re:North American bank system is BACKWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.pcfinancial.ca stop getting raped.

    2. Re:North American bank system is BACKWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true. The North American bank system seems very alien and antiquated to us Europeans. Maybe things will change now like ING and ABN-AMRO (both Dutch) are gaining market share in that part of the world.

  65. Big Questions by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just have a few big questions, not that the bank is likely to answer any of them. I suppose the inevitable lawsuits may flush out some of them though.

    1. What OS(s) were they running before this happened?

    2. Were they really doing an upgrade or a crossgrade, that is, switching to a new system altogether?

    3. Was this being handled by in house IT or was it being outsourced half way around the world?

    1. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All press releases, reports are quite tight-lipped about this.
      I am curious how Canadian media will handle these bottom-line questions.

    2. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      AIX on RS/6000's?
      Maybe it's on an IBM mainframe and they upgraded from MVS/OS390/ZOS?? Maybe the upgrade was to ZLinux? Wouldn't that make Bill happy! ;-)

      Anyhow, whenever I go in to redo my mortgage and loans, I check out their desktop system. They used to run OS/2 (years ago), now it's either NT or 2000 on the IBM PCs on their desks.

      I know they also used to run Netware (buddy was one of their NDS gurus 5 years ago).

      Anyhow on their desk, they usually have a terminal session open, I suspect this goes back to their main datacentre. Hard to say what the back end is, I suspect it's IBM hardware/software though.

    3. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here are some answers:
      1. BeOS
      2. They were doing an upgrade to RSX/11M Plus.
      3. Doesn't matter, because remember it's not who is to blame, it is who can you blame ;-)

    4. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work for a financial firm. Not a bank, but we talk with a lot of banks.

      RBC is probably an IBM mainframe environment. OS/390 or similar OS. They probably have AS/400 and AIX hosts as well for other functions (printing, data transfer, etc.) IBM sells you a whole shop and then you're stuck with it.

      The OS is irrelevant, this is most likely an application (transactional database) error. Read the Globe And Mail article.

      You call in the vendor (IBM) to do system upgrades and the like. They are VERY careful. If it went wrong, RBC would be laying the blame on them right now, and publicly.

      Switching between (physical) systems for a mainframe environment is commonplace enough and would be fully supported by IBM. Parallel Sysplex and all that. One of my vendors did it over a weekend without incident - except they didn't wait until month-end to do it! Doh! That was dumb.

      I don't do anything around month-end or quarter-end if I can help it. It's asking for trouble.

      I'm pretty sure RBC does their IT in-house. These tend to be large, customized or internally developed systems, so outsourcing would mean almost certain death to the company. Even moving/consolidating operations between different groups in the same company is very painful.

      Unless they were trying to

    5. Re:Big Questions by Alomex · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. What OS(s) were they running before this happened?

      This question has "newbie" written all over. Bank applications run on true and tested OSes written decades ago. They run on large mainframes with uptime that often goes back to the day the computer was turned on sometime in the 70s or 80s.

      This problem is, in all likelihood, an application problem.

    6. Re:Big Questions by valkr1e · · Score: 1

      most banks and financial processing facilities do indeed run a fairly heterogeneous environment, usually focused around a central mainframe(typically an s/390 box), the smaller organizations may use a cluster or maybe a task-based group of rs/6000's, I worked at one of the largest financial processing firms in the world for awhile, and they ran everything from NT4, to solaris, to linux, to HPUX to AIX, to os390, and then some, many of the appications used are CA programs, or homebrew apps, you would really be surprised how many homebrew apps can be on a system in such an organization.
      typically, upgrades are handled by a combination of in-house staff and Manufacturers via support contracts, very rarely will one group do anything without the other there, unless it is something like a memory replacement on a non-vital system.

      i can say this though, where i was at, a 15 minute delay meant at least one head would roll, a couple days was not an option.

    7. Re:Big Questions by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're close to the money re: OS390, and it being a bank problem (not vendor). I work for another canadian bank, but have former associates at RBC. Here's what I've heard is happening:

      - May 31st = month end. new month end code gets run first time in prod (JCL), there's problems - not sure of name of system, but the general bank ledger for customers is fubared.
      - RBC rolls back all changes, so RBC is 1 day behind on Tuesday.
      - re-run batch with old code on Wednesday am... unfortunately recovery procedures are flawed/human error, batch is screwed up again.
      - now bank is 2-3 days behind...can't process transactions effectively, can't catch up with sequential batches in evenings because there's too much to run.
      - RBC departments start running independently based on May 31st data...can't afford to be down more than 2 days. now the roadmap is a mess for recovery, general ledger is still at May 31st state (might be June 1st after a successful batch run last night???)

      Apparently about 80-100 IT staff are living at the Skydome hotel in Toronto working 16 hour shifts (16 on, 8 off) to try and get caught up. Everything i've heard suggests that they know they can't get done during the business week...they're relying on 2 days of 24hr downtime on the weekend to reload the batches and get systems back in sync.

      Based on my experience in Canadian banking (7 years) plus stories of old timers, this is the worst outage in close to 10 years, maybe the worst in 20 if my rumours prove to be true. I have no direct mainframe experience, though, so take my descripton of the problems with a grain of salt...

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    8. Re:Big Questions by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "This question has "newbie" written all over. Bank applications run on true and tested OSes written decades ago. "

      So, which one was it? Do you know, or do you just feel the need to belittle the person who asked?

      You don't know what system this particular bank ran, what its uptime was, or when it was installed.

      You are just guessing, and are no more qualified to answer the question that the O.P. you responded to!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    9. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just guessing, and are no more qualified to answer the question that the O.P. you responded to!

      This is flawed logic. Not all guesses are the same.

      Suppose we are asked to guess the number of cylinders in Michael Schumacher's F1 racing car. I don't know what engine he has on his car, but I bet he's likelier to have somewhere around 10 cylinders than, say 2 cylinders. Both are guesses but one is way better than the other, and in fact guessing 2 cylinders for a F1 car is just dumb.

      Same thing here. Having done work for large banks in the past, I'm familiar with the systems they run in their mainframe room. Guessing that the problems a bank has in their large mainframe are somewhat comparable to the blue-screen-of-death in PCs shows lack of experience. However, you are right that the tone of my answer might have been a bit too harsh.

    10. Re:Big Questions by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Having done work for large banks in the past, I'm familiar with the systems they run in their mainframe room."

      So am I. I have a pretty good idea what sort of systems they probably use. I can practically visualize the JCL and REXX involved in that nightmare, unfortunately. But I haven't yet seen a post by anyone who actually knows what's going on.

      My bet is, a mix of standard systems and homemade cobol on a 390. Also, I'll bet it was a problem with a process in the business domain, and not necessarily a software bug. But I don't know, and I don't know anybody who does know, and the bank isn't talking.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Big Questions by rborek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess this begs the question - why was the new code not tested, using live data, on the test/devel machine? In an environment such as this, you can't do half-assed testing - you have to run real, live data into it and test it out (ie one month before, duplicate the data - if it isn't already duplicating it real-time into the test machine, which I would expect - and run the code. Any problems, wait one month and try again).

      This comes down to poor testing. The manager(s) involved should (and probably will) be fired - they would have had to have signed off on the code change, and odds are that they rushed the programmers/QA people through testing.

    12. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking with their SEV 1 person. This story seems to hold up. They are having problem getting each day to balance. June 2, 2004 transactions have taken two days to complete. They could not properly balance June 2, 2004. It related to the branches which are processing client transaction manually. All the transactions which are written down on pieces of paper, are prone to human error.

      The bigger problem is moving from a tech computer to a human resource problem. As humans get tired, they will make mistakes. This seems to be the problem with RBC right now. Commom problem is after 24hrs, human resources are going to fade.

      The amount of time between day transactions from May 31, 2004 to June 2, 2004 are increasing. The staff are taking longer and longer to get back with a response.

      I've been told that the problem could be outstanding until mid-week. Tuesday or Wednesday.

      I feel really bad for their staff. A lot of people are very upset that this problem has occurred.

    13. Re:Big Questions by BubbaHoTep · · Score: 1

      I actually work and have worked for several Canadian financial institutions, RBC being one of them. One thing you have to realize about RBC is that they are very poorly run from an IT perspective. RBC lacks any real form of process and most development is performed in a very haphazard manner. There is no QA group at RBC and most applications at RBC are very unstable; most of the WebSphere based applications utilize a restart script on the server that recycles an application because if they are left to run on their own, they become unresponsive and can freeze the app server. It is not surprising that this has happened. Actually, there was a major problem with the Commercial banking web application last week that caused it to go off line for several days, and almost resulted in the loss of 3 months of data because there were no DB backups performed since early March! Most of the marketing/business types that go to the media and give reports are not aware of the situation. In fact, most of the executives are not aware of the situation.

    14. Re:Big Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this being handled by in house IT or was it being outsourced half way around the world?

      You are about to lose your job to outsourcing and you are looking for reasons to blame India for anything you can?

  66. Hmm.... by gordonb · · Score: 1

    First the UK air traffic control system, then the RBC, all during "software upgrades." At least that's the story they're letting out, but a worm and/or a breach of the system could also have occurred, perhaps by malicious hackers, perhaos by some who got passwords from some phishing scam, or perhaps some directed attack by "terrorists." I would be interested in info from RBC employees. What really happened?

    </tin_hat>

  67. What are they running? Don't ask Netcraft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See nextcraft [sic] - HPUX and AIX, at least on their web servers, and no doubt also on their critical systems.

    By what logic did you come to that conclusion? Internet Service automatically equals internal systems? Maybe you could do a little more research and find out who is hosting that server farm.

    Conversely then you would guess their web servers should also be IBM iSeries systems since they run them internally!

    1. Re:What are they running? Don't ask Netcraft! by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      C'mon, leave the poor guy alone... He's obviosly in training for making improper management assumptions. That IS one of the most important skills to have if you wanna claw your way up the corporate ladder.

    2. Re:What are they running? Don't ask Netcraft! by mwillems · · Score: 1

      Banks almost all run *NIX o some sort, and when a bank runs AIX on their web servers, it is pretty much a given that they do not run Solaris on their transactional systems. This is an assumption yes, but it is a proper management assumption, not an improper one.

      --

      ---
      BDOS ERR ON A:>
  68. This is why I keep a couple weeks worth of cash... by zorkmid · · Score: 1

    A prominent bay area bank that I'd been using for about 7 years up and decided I didn't exist.
    Checking with ~$4,000 - gone
    Savings with ~$3,000 - gone
    Money Market account with ~ $15,000 (6 months emergency fund) - gone
    Visa Card - dead

    Took about 2 weeks to get it straightened out. Luckily I had an Amex card I could get cash advances off of otherwise I'd have been screwed.

    Now I have a $500 in cash in an envelope shrewdly hidden just in case things break again.

  69. Must be the Parts They Copied From SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  70. rbc by Feyr · · Score: 1

    guess i'll be watching my bank account for a few days. my account is with another bank, but my car loan is with rbc and i use direct draft hmm

    funny, last time i went to make an extra 5k$ payment on it, the lady at the counter tried to make me switch to them! hah

  71. Now All of Canada Knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unixware sucks.

  72. Don't tell me, let me guess by mysterious_mark · · Score: 1

    They must have outsourced to India, I'm sure they got a great deal on cheap code. M

  73. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF, Are you a monkey who can't stop masturbating?
    Learn some self control.

  74. Darn... by presarioD · · Score: 5, Funny

    We finally reached an agreement with this Nigerean wife of an ex-general that she found $10,000,000 in a hidden vault behind the ex'es private toilet bin and agreed to give me 10% if I provide them with my checking account number.

    Darn Canadian Bank, now the whole deal might not go through...

    --
    Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
    1. Re:Darn... by mrlsd · · Score: 1

      Just tell her that an unexpected problem has occurred and you need some money to tide you over until the bank gets its act together.

  75. Bigger Question by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 1
    1. What OS(s) were they running before this happened?

    How about:

    1. What OS(s) will they be running now that this has happened?
  76. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by rikkards · · Score: 1

    My rule of thumb is try not to live in a neighborhood where you may get stabbed, shot, mugged. If it costs you more to live somewhere for a little more safety it is worth it.
    Plus the 1/3 only works in an area where they don't have extremely low rental availability

  77. Internet on every PC-Con-fidence games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I visited RBC earlier this year to make changes to my retirement plan and I was shocked to see that the account manager used a single PC to manage the accounts and access the internet. When I pointed that out, he said "don't worry, we run the best anti-virus software there is" (McAfee by the look of the icon in the tray). Because, as we all know, it's those viruses that eventually steal passwords and break into the databases. *rollseyes*"

    Hopefully that *change* was to take your money out of that bank?

    ---
    "Sorry, but according to our [broken] tests [we turn off and on when we feel like it], you are trying to post from an open HTTP proxy [we think]."

  78. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I TOTALLY feel your pain, man. I'm 20 and make twice that and it still goes fast. Now obviously I do have more to play with and it's only my insane cheapness/saving-habits that make me live frugally, but not too many people realize just how FAST it goes when you support yourself. My g/f still lives at home and thinks I'm rich. She has no comprehension of bills and taxes.

    AC 'cause co-workers read this...

  79. Re:Eh by delcielo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Programmer 1: It happened like 3 days ago, eh.

    Programmer 2: And welcome to day 3.

    Programmer 1: "make install" hosed it.

    Programmer 2: Hosed it down, eh, like backbacon at a Bah Mitzvah.

    Programmer 1: But it's okay, eh. I got my thinking touque on and the beer and pizza are on the way.

    Programmer 2: Yeah, we should have it back up by tomorrow, eh. Only, we're gonna need some more vacation after this.

    Programmer 1: And beer, eh.

    Programmer 2: Yeah, more beer.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  80. Living the American Dream by E-Rock · · Score: 1

    At 30k annual and assuming 70% take home, you're bringing in around $3600/month. Of this you have $3200 in bills or 89% of your income.

    You're living the American Dream, often refered to by financial planners as living beyond your means.

    1. Re:Living the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a problem with basic mathematics? 30K a year is $2500 a month before tax.

    2. Re:Living the American Dream by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      Wait, in what world does 30 / 12 * 0.70 equal 3600? I make twice what he does and I pull home $3600; his take-home is closer to $2000. He is likely living beyond his means as far as rent goes, although I don't know the area, and $300 a month for bills is about right, when you factor in car insurance (and that's on a cheap car). I'd say he doesn't have a car payment, or cable TV, or anthing along those lines, either.

      Fact is, life is expensive, and at $30K a year in any major metro in the US, you're not going to have much spare cash living on your own.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    3. Re:Living the American Dream by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      His calendar only has 6.4 months on it, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:Living the American Dream by zorkmid · · Score: 1

      70% of 30K is 21K or $1750 a month.

      30K annual = a take home of $1975 for a single person in california.

      Either way if they're spending $3200/month on bills they're farked for sure.

    5. Re:Living the American Dream by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      I'm bringing $1640 home a month after taxes. If your really that interested my rent is $700. That leaves me with about $940. Sure, as another poster said, I could live in a place down the road some where I would get stabbed, shot, or have my place broken into and my hardware stolen, for a mere $450/Mo but is it really worth it?

      Its amazing to think that if I were to live in my freakin car for a month relying only on my inverter, laptop, and wireless card, I would have saved over $1000.

      The biggest expense right now is rent, and second to that is the G/F. Girls are expensive, can I get an Amen?

      I guess now that G4 ate Tech TV I can get rid of Basic and digital cable and save an extra $50/mo, but that translates into famele as "I've got $50 extra to take you out now"

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    6. Re:Living the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take home is ~1700 and yes I've actually got Cable TV, Cable Modem, and a car payment. I'm definatly living beyond my limits but with no family to turn to I've got no choice but to stick it out and make it by.

    7. Re:Living the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but that translates into famele as "I've got $50 extra to take you out now"

      If that's how she sees things, maybe it's time you threw her out on her ass.

    8. Re:Living the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but then I'd become a lonely slashdotter with no g/f... I'd fit in too much. But your point is very valid

    9. Re:Living the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe... press multiply not divide on the .7. =)

    10. Re:Living the American Dream by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "At 30k annual and assuming 70% take home, you're bringing in around $3600/month."

      You overestimate the takehome percentage. 30K is probably less than $1000 every two weeks.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Living the American Dream by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "The biggest expense right now is rent, and second to that is the G/F. Girls are expensive, can I get an Amen?"

      Boo.

      The good ones are self-sufficient.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:Living the American Dream by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Retarded math error aside, when I made 25k a year, my after tax income was about 70%. Currently, at more than twice that, my take home precentage is right about 70%.

      With the math done correctly, 30k is $1,750 per month.

    13. Re:Living the American Dream by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "With the math done correctly, 30k is $1,750 per month."

      That only sounds like a decent wage in places where $30K salaries are rare.

      I have co-workers who pay more than that for housing costs. Granted, they live in San Francisco.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  81. I've got a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's us these computer things for voting. These problems shouldn't crop up there.

  82. Expert guesses? by phizman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who are these clowns that the media talk to for their "expert" opinion on computers?

    "George Geczy, a software developer and computer consultant based in Ancaster, Ont., guessed that the problem involves identification numbers assigned to transactions"

    Thousands of different reasons why their system cratered and some guy running a consulting firm from his basement nailed it for us! Guess his experience in installing MySQL a couple times helped him diagnose their massively huge database issue.

    Just because you have a IT job and a bank card, doesn't make you an expert.

  83. Hookers and Craq by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  84. Or just learn some disipline by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just grow up and dont spend the money.. Its pretty easy..

    If you cant control your spending urges, then you have an issue you should actually address and 'solve', not just mask it, as you are suggesting.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Or just learn some disipline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spending Urges? I dont think you get it, I dont have a credit card, I dont buy the latest video card every 3 months, Hell, I even pirate games because I cant afford them. I'm talking about BILL$ here, the ones you have to pay or your credit goes to shit and your landlord kicks you on the street and your left with the cats in the gutter eating spam out of a can.

    2. Re:Or just learn some disipline by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Even if it's just bills, it's still living beyond your means. The idea is to get a cheaper apartment (or find roommates, or something), use less water and electricity, etc.

      Of course, the grandparent didn't give you enough credit - putting tax refunds etc. to pay forwards on your rent is being disciplined, and a good start. But, it's still only a start. What you really ought to do is put it in some sort of investment, like an index fund, or even a CD (if you're worried about risk - which you shouldn't be since you're young), that makes it inaccessable.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  85. Right... by Scott+Richter · · Score: 1
    I wonder if the software was written off shore?

    Because God knows there are no shitty programmers in the U.S.

  86. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is insightful? I hope aardwolf was actually trying to be funny. Otherwise his "don't save money because it is too easy to spend savings" plan will have him working until the day he dies. Personally, my SO and I live off of one paycheck and put the other into some form of savings or another. Using this plan, we're aiming at having a million smackers in the bank before we're fifty.

    Better still, this plan doesn't have us up Shit Creek when a paycheck (or twenty) is missed.

    If you have such a serious problem with raiding your savings account direct deposit can be a great tool for you. Have a small chunk of each check sent into this savings account and never touch it. Never ever. Hell, you'd probably be better off if you didn't even open your bank statements for that account but once a year. Whatever you do, living month to month is not the answer.

    Peter

  87. Yeah, I got paided - Finally by Graemee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone effected by the mess, I have good news, My pay is in the bank. No news whether they "fixed" the problem or used a work around, which is more likely IMHO.

  88. Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft must have been to blame, after! Perhaps RBC has a "non-disclosure agreement" with Microsoft. If the software screws up, RBC won't disclose what OS they are using!

    I hope that RBC isn't too dense to learn from an obvious object lesson!

    Maybe even Microsoft will finally be able to understand why business users (and most everybody else too) are not keen and enthusiastic over annual "upgrades" and those practically uncountable numbers of "critical bug fixes"!

    P.S.
    I mean "upgrade" in the sense that Windows 2000 is an "upgrade" from Windows XP!!! Har! Har! Har!

    As they say, "A word to the wise may be sufficient, but the truly dense need an object lesson.".

  89. Re:This is why I keep a couple weeks worth of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or just deal with more than one bank.

    No more eggs all in one basket scenario.

  90. Yup by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They have already angered the IS/IT Gods and will not be able to successfully use computers for at least 3 lifetimes. No amount of bailing out of SCO now will save them.

    It makes me wonder; if you piss off enough of the clueful folks in this industry, would they simply not apply at your organization, insuring that the only people your HR department sees are the dregs of the vocational schools? Since HR people can't tell the difference between good IT people and bad, no one would get wind of the situation until such time as there were a major failure in your systems brought on by your shitty IT department. Makes you stop and think, doesn't it?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  91. May be that will teach you-Expert testi-money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha! *falls out of chair laughing*

    I got news for you bub. With the way things are in the real world (and not the one "experts" live in). The majority live from paycheck to paycheck. There is little to no, discretionary income to *save*

    And assuming there was, how long do you think it will take to get 3 to 6 months worth?

    ---
    "Sorry, but according to our [broken, like our filters] tests [which we turn on and off when we feel like it], you are trying to post from an open HTTP proxy. "

    1. Re:May be that will teach you-Expert testi-money by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      BS, I used to think the exact same way. I've told myself "I'll save whatever's left over from my paycheck for an emergency fund". Sure enough, I always ended up not saving because there never were any money leftover.

      I finally got sick and tired of living paycheck to paycheck and started checking out personal finance websites, such as The Motley Fool. I got myself a free 30-day membership and visited forums to learn about living below your means, cutting credit card interest rates and playing their "balance transfer games", and the "paying yourself first" method. With the lowered expenses, I put away at least $100 a month toward savings and investments. I treat that $100 or more as a bill that I must pay (thus "paying your self first") before any other bills. Otherwise I'll found a way to spend that money.

      I have saving and non-retirement investments of $1200 right now. That's not that much but that's way better than being broke. It took me about 6 months to save up that much, and I estimate that I'll need $6000 for the 3 months worth, so at this rate, I'll need about 2 more years (yes, I wish that I started sooner).

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  92. Math correction by Fencepost · · Score: 1
    If he's taking home 70% of $30k a year, his takehome is ~$1,750. You divided by 0.7 instead of multiplying by 0.7.

    That puts his rent somewhere around $750-800/month which I believe will get you a reasonable 1-bedroom or a not-so-nice 2-bedroom in the Chicago area, adjust accordingly for cost of living elsewhere.

    Getting (and staying) a month ahead on your rent seems to me like a perfectly reasonable way to provide yourself with a buffer that you won't normally touch.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:Math correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were about right with your math. Actually I kinda beef'd everyones math because my income is not 30K/Yr, its actually somewhere aroung 27-28, but I get a nice bonus every year which does count to the IRS but I dont see on the monthly basis.

      Oh, and the Location is beautiful Williamsburg, VA. Chicago sounds nice tho.

    2. Re:Math correction by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Damn, you city people are expensive. My 3 bedroom home only runs 500 a month.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    3. Re:Math correction by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      My shame overwhelms me.

    4. Re:Math correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you city people are expensive. My 3 bedroom home only runs 500 a month.

      Where?

    5. Re:Math correction by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "Damn, you city people are expensive. My 3 bedroom home only runs 500 a month."

      Well, in the city you can conceivably find jobs that can pay for pricier housing, whereas out in the sticks, housing may be a lot cheaper, but there is no way to pay for it. Oh, you're going to commute? I consider that to be a waste of life, not a benefit. Maybe you've carved out some niche where you can live out of town and still feed yourself.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  93. I too, missed my pay by justice7 · · Score: 1

    I work at the Ministry Of Health (Ontario) , and RBC was to blame for my 1 day late pay. Software is always to blame isnt it? Next thing you know, it was the computer's fault for ENRON's little mishap. this proves it really is bad karma to invest in SCO

  94. You missed some by IncohereD · · Score: 2, Informative

    Royal, CIBC, Scotiabank, and Bank of Montreal

    As someone pointed out, you missed TD Canada Trust (until recently two banks). There's also National Bank, and Laurentian (which again was recently acquired by another bank, but still has some locations open under that name).

    And we even get stuff like Ethical Funds. Who aren't even the one I was looking for that offers a similar service.

    1. Re:You missed some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget National Bank of Canada, PC Financial, ATB, First Calgary Financial, and many credit unions. You don't -have- to use one of the big, national banks...

      As much as TD CanadaTrust sucks ass since TD bought out CanadaTrust, they are still better than any of the other national choices.

    2. Re:You missed some by BigASS · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but PC financial is actually operated and owned by CIBC through Amicus Bank, which is a subsidiary. Hence PC customers can bank at any CIBC branch for free (though with no teller services). Still part of one of the biggest banks, but with slightly better service and much better rates.

      --
      - Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  95. Don't Rely on Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm one of the Canadians affected - the paycheque I deposited on June 1st disappeared from the system after I had made a withdrawal and a credit card payment, leaving my account in the negative.

    Fortunately, I've made it a habit to keep cash on myself at all times (hence the withdrawal), so I'll weather this glitch okay.

    A lot of Canadians rely completely on electronic cash (debit cards) for all their purchases. I used to be the same way, until I realized that the only ways the debit card had advanced our society was by:
    1. Making store checkout lines twice as slow, as every Dick and Harry tries four debit cards and two credit cards looking for an account with money.
    2. Making it easy to overspend because you lose track of your account balances.
    3. Leaving you cashless and stranded every time there's a network glitch, a power outage, a bank error, or what-have-you. This happens frequently, and never at a good time.

    So now, thanks to the remarkable invention of cash (physical money), I am no longer dependant on the workings of computer systems I have no control over!

  96. so how long before... by hopeless+case · · Score: 1

    they write a press release claiming it was a DDOS attack from the open source community, then ask us to responsibly join them in condemning such attacks?

  97. Insult to Injury by sagneta · · Score: 1

    The fact that slashdot published a link to the Bank Of Canada's website means that apparently they *also* will be experiencing issues with their website. I.T. will be having a bad day at the bank.

  98. Banking Hazards-Reentry burns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hate to be a troll, but if you go to the bank teller, always ask them for a receipt and double-check your account numbers on that receipt. "

    Yes, however most deposit tickets have your account number on them in magnetic ink. No need to reenter.

    "Yes, the teller shoulders some of the responsibility, but so do you."

    Not according to his story. Did you read it?

    ---
    "Sorry, but according to our tests [which a thousand monkeys wrote], you are trying [succeeding somehow] to post from an open HTTP proxy."

    1. Re:Banking Hazards-Reentry burns. by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      Yes, however most deposit tickets have your account number on them in magnetic ink. No need to reenter.

      Most banks in Canada did away with the deposit tickets long ago. What ScotiaBank does now is have you swipe your card and enter your PIN whenever you go to a teller. Which is a bit of a pain, but solves this problem.

  99. Let's figure out WTF's going on by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > I made my credit card payment via online banking on June 1st, and the transaction went through. However, on June 2nd, the system decided to pay my credit card again a second time. Now I'm down a few hundred bucks.... should be fun getting this sorted out :|

    Speculation:

    Suppose Something Bad(tm) happens to the database and the failover machines. Traditionally, you restore from backups, and roll it forward based on the transaction log.

    I can think of a few scenarios, but I don't like any of them. Just about every scenario I can imagine involves combinations of restoring the wrong version of the database from backups, a rollback operation that fails, or a rolling forward the wrong set of transactions from a log. I thought the whole point of an RDBMS was to have transactional integrity -- so that if the database thinks it's June 2nd, you can't roll forward a June 1 transaction to make it happen twice. A database shouldn't be able to permit that to happen, even if God himself is at the console.

    Any DBA wonks care to speculate further as to WTF could be going on?

    Somehow I'm uninspired by the "media-relations officer" saying "I am not a technical person [ ... ] It did have to do with computer software and at this point I understand it did have something to do with sequencing. [ ... ] I honestly don't know. As I say, I mean, it's one of those tech things."

    Now, that might be good media relations, but I'm not media. If I banked in Canada, there'd only be one more transaction pending against any account I had at this bank: A transfer of the account's full balance to a competitor.

  100. It happened to me ... by husker_man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was at a remote site installing some new Unix workstations when I got an urgent call from the site administrator for some servers I had just installed a few days ago. One of the workstations was down, and wouldn't come up. I asked him what had changed, had he done anything, etc. He said that he hadn't done anything, could I come quick. I finished up what I was doing, and drove over there (45 miles, unfortunately).

    (Background info: I had told the managers at the site that the site admin needed three classes of training, hands on work with me while I installed and implemented the systems, and some other experience before he went solo. The managers agreed to this but they never came through: He got zero training, and "was too busy" to work hands-on with me).

    True enough, the system was down, and I had an appointment that night (Friday night, of course), but I would come in over the weekend to see what I could do. Of course, the guy hadn't backed up this system ever according to the backup procedures I had handed him.

    I spend three hours on a Saturday trying to get this station up (it had design part data, and that data couldn't be permanently lost), and finally told the managers at the site that they needed to get the vendor out as it appeared to be a hardware problem based on what I was seeing (bios type messages, but once it hit the hard drive it died hard).

    Vendor came out, checked out the hardware, and reported that nothing was wrong with the CPU, memory, SCSI cards, busses, disk drive, etc. The site administrator then remembers that the day before everything hit the fan that he created a /development directory off of the root disk, loaded a database application into it but filled up the hard disk, and then to clean up after himself did a "rm -r /dev*". The /development directory was gone, along with /dev!

    Immediately after he told me this little blurb (and I was red hot, Why didn't you tell me when I asked!) he informed me that it was time for him to leave and he did! Luckily for him he did leave, otherwise I was going to strangle him.

    Fortunately, I was able to move the disk drive to piggyback off of a similar system, copy the device files from that system to the munged drive, and then recreate the couple of device files that were specific to this system. End result was that the system was back 100% again, and fully backed up (since I had zero confidence in the jerk). I told the managers what had happened, and what the actions of their site admin had cost me both personally and in terms of my work hours. I got blamed by the site admin for "not training him enough", for not being responsive enough, and for accepting his initial story and not digging into it to find out the root causes.

  101. Credit Union Networks by Fencepost · · Score: 4, Informative
    A lot of credit unions have started to get together in networks, with the effect that you can go to other credit unions in the same network and do almost everything that your credit union provides, with some limitations. The two credit unions I have accounts at are both members of CUSwirl/CU Service Centers, and it's quite convenient.

    In my case one CU is an account I've had since I was in my teens but their offices are about 15 miles away, and the other is from my former employer and is two states away. I drop in at the local one sometimes since it's about a mile from my girlfriend's office, but if I'm not headed up that direction I can go to the local credit union about a mile and a half from my house.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  102. (OT) who's more likely to cheat at cards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheney?

  103. The Domnion? Here?!? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

    " A few short years ago, the Toronto Dominion's entire network went down for a whole day."

    Crikey! The Dominion has a network in freakin' Toronto?!? Activate the planetary defense grid before the Jem'Hadar warships overwhelm us!

    (Jadzia, I've got a... secure bunker set up. Follow me.)

  104. The solution: by caulfield · · Score: 1

    Don't bank at a bank! I've been through CIBC ($40/mo. in service charges), and RBC (truly abysmal financial service, but only $20/mo. in service charges). Try a Credit Union! They are member-owned, and profits are shared with members, not with shareholders (like at banks).

    Personally, i use Citizens Bank of Canada, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of VanCity Credit Union. The best part of Citizens Bank is that it's completely online. Unlimited bank transactions, including debit for free when you have a balance over $1000, or only $8 otherwise.

    Some people use President's Choice, but it is the unholy union of Superstore and CIBC: two companies that treat their customers and employees like garbage.

    1. Re:The solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick with president's choice they offer great service, free banking and you earn points you can use to buy groceries for using it. I switched from a crappy credit union to them.

  105. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your right, my budget is fucked. I make NASA look good. I envy you. I've always wanted to actually keep money in savings, but it seems every time I put it there I have to take it out at the end of the month crunch, or those last few days before the next paycheck. Hell, I'd prolly live a lot cheaper and save money but my SO doesnt see eye to eye with me. She obviously could take a lesson from yours. At least I've got a 401K I'm maxing out because I dont want to end up like you said, working until the day I die, fsck that.

    Hell, I'm only 21, maybe I should just ditch the chick and go dirt cheap for a while (cut phone, cable, _dates_)

  106. Redundant Bank Accounts by CHaN_316 · · Score: 1

    Thankfully I have a bank account at another bank, so my finances aren't paralyzed by this mishap. In situations like this, having a redundant bank account at another bank has been quite handy. I guess a lot of principles of risk management of computers can be applied to things like bank accounts since bank systems are systems after all, and they WILL fail.

    Although, in some cases, a redundant account is useless if something hits a bunch of banks. I'm reminded of that internet worm a while back that brought down ATM systems and bogged down the internet. I forget if that was SQL Slammer or Red Code.

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
  107. Bill G., is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By reading this sig you've just sold your soul to the Devil. Damn draconian license terms

  108. Only until... by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    SO finds envelope :-)

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  109. Why is your girlfriend expensive? by Webapprentice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when does having a girlfriend mean having a money pit? It sounds like the girlfriend is more interested in material goods than you or you are out to make a big, but expensive impression on her.

    1. Re:Why is your girlfriend expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is when my 'rents died I got a big settlement and blew a ton taking her out and being a "big spender" as shirley basey would put it. That lasted for about a year and she got too used to it. I should have put that money in rent, a bond, mutual fund, something, but instead i spoiled her rotten and turned her into a nag.

      prolly not worth it, but she plays Q3, makes levels for UT, writes C++, does audio and video editing on her laptop, wardrives, and has a fucking great divx collection. Maybe I should turn gay (cuz then I could get chicks ;) and keep her around as a friend.

    2. Re:Why is your girlfriend expensive? by Tripster · · Score: 1

      You really should have used the money as a down payment for your own home, condo, something other than rental property.

      Renting really is throwing away money each month, whereas at least with a mortgage a percentage each month is added directly onto your net worth.

      The funny thing is for many areas you will actually end up paying less in mortgage than you would renting a similar dwelling in the area. Where we live our mortgage is $400/month (we upped that some to pay it off faster tho) and rent in the area for a similar house would easily be $700+.

      Then again, you could move to Saskatchewan and get a house for $35,000CDN (about $25,000US).

    3. Re:Why is your girlfriend expensive? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Renting really is throwing away money each month, whereas at least with a mortgage a percentage each month is added directly onto your net worth.
      "

      There are other arguments. For instance, it can be a liability to be early into a mortgage and suddenly want to move to a better job market. Or if you are still trying to figure out how to live where you want to live, but are putting up with a crappy town for a while.

      Equity is what's good about a mortgage, if you live in a place with an appreciating value.

      Renting works out to be a good deal for the guy in a divorce situation. Far better to walk away from a lease than to spend the next 30 years buying someone a house.

      Renting isn't always a bad option, buying isn't always a good one.

      How plentiful are $70K/yr jobs in Saskatchewan, by the way? What sort of location has those $35K homes? Is it realistic for an American to want to live there?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Why is your girlfriend expensive? by legojenn · · Score: 1
      Then again, you could move to Saskatchewan and get a house for $35,000CDN (about $25,000US).

      But that would mean having to LIVE in Sassykatchewan which would be terribly fun if you don't like long winters and being seperated from friends and ummm can you earn as much money out there as you would in Ontario?

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  110. Not SCO Software by Seek_1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    RBC (ie Royal Bank) invested $50M in SCO simply on the odd chance that they did actually did pull off a court win. Basically they were covering all the bases for their investment funds, which you would expect from any decent financial institution. I don't know for a fact that RBC uses SCO-Unix, but that is not what the money they paid to SCO was for.

    1. Re:Not SCO Software by WNight · · Score: 1

      That doesn't justify anything. By that line of thinking they should back criminals too, betting on them getting off on a technicality.

      Simply the fact that you're doing something for business reasons does not excuse you from ethical considerations.

    2. Re:Not SCO Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, so i was wrong - it got rated -1 offtopic as opposed to -1 flamebait. Looks like you really don't need to be a psychic to predict slashdot moderators' actions

  111. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My G/F has her daddy pay for everything and she has no idea how much living is either. It sucks when all your friends think your fucking rich or something because you're a "computer guy" for a company while they're nailing drywall.

    I actually logged every transaction one month on my iPaq (a gift) and broke it down for her. It ends up that I spend about 1/4 my income on her. I was trying to show her how expensive bills and such are and how it adds up but instead I got one of those nights where you wish you had kept your mouth shut as she sob'd all over the place incomprehensible (sp). You know the drill.

  112. Just like the suits? My Ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visa card payments dont go to RBC's internal collections dept until they are 30 or 60 days past due. At 90 days or 120 days they get sold to a collection agency.

    So pay your bills and stop blaming the glitch, Maria!

  113. MOD THE PARENT UP! by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Please mod the parent up.

    This is about as specific as we can get at this moment on the nature of the failure.

  114. That's what you get for outsourcing to INDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jab #1
    shoddy code, shoddy practices, all from shoddy india. but, you "save" so much money from outsourcing!? the old phrase "you get what you pay for" seems to still hold true.

    jab #2
    it doesn't matter. obviously since its such a commoditized market, one upgrade is no different than another... glad I didn't write that brainless CIO blather fodder.

  115. This is why you don't live paychk to paychk by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Informative

    If a day delay could send you under, you have big problems.

    1. Re:This is why you don't live paychk to paychk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "If a day delay could send you under, you have big problems."

      It's been a while, but I've been in this position. Last paycheck wasn't enough to pay everything, and the next one won't be either, but at least it will let us pay a bill or two in time to stop legal consequences. I've gone without food while waiting for a paycheck. I doubt you have, and I doubt you understand how tough it gets for some people.

    2. Re:This is why you don't live paychk to paychk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's good to have you back, Sir! God, how I missed you, Sir!

  116. May be that will teach you-Threes a gang. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's inconvenient, yes. But in the long run, having roommates for a couple of years will have helped you out alot."

    Until they steal your VCR, money, jewelry, and car.

    Did I mention, they got the GF too?

  117. We're Canadian. We don't sue, eh? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    We take our business elsewhere. I shopped around, and I get a way better deal at my bank than I'd get at Royal. Those brigands charge money every time you use a non-Royal DEBIT MACHINE!

    Anyway, in Canada, we generally don't go running to lawyers the moment we're slightly inconvenienced. Besides, Royal said they'd pay for every penalty that any of their customers incur.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:We're Canadian. We don't sue, eh? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Those brigands charge money every time you use a non-Royal DEBIT MACHINE!

      Doesn't every Canadian bank do this now? This is the 'disloyalty' fee.

    2. Re:We're Canadian. We don't sue, eh? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I meant when you go to the store and pay with your bank card, if the store uses CIBC for their debit machines (the direct payment dealies) and you use Royal, Royal charges you ~$1.

      I use a subset of CIBC - President's Choice. Unlimited free debit transactions (on any machines), unlimited computer banking, unlimited free use of CIBC bank machines. No monthly fee, no minimum balance. You also get points towards groceries for paying your bills.

      Horrible customer service, next-to-nothing interest, but it's the best deal I could find.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    3. Re:We're Canadian. We don't sue, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no free monthly statements anymore, it costs $1 now, and account activity updates at the ATM are for current month only. The annual "summary" statement is just total in and total out per month. Amicus/CIBC (owner of PCFinancial) is squeezing customers more since the Enron fiasco. I'm shopping around for a decent credit union.

  118. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My bad, 1/5th

  119. Don't live from payday to payday by a1z26b2y25 · · Score: 1

    DOH ? !

  120. The real story on inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Re-elect Bush and see what happens to your buck...

    Actually, it has more to do with the relative rate at which the US and Canada are inflating their currencies. Inflation, regardless of what the media is babbling about the Consumer Price Index, is about the number of units of currency and the available goods. Period. If the government prints more money, every dollar is worth less. However, that devaluation is not instant. It does take a while for prices to rise. The people who hold the money immediately after it is printed get nearly full value for it.

    That's not to say that Pres. Bush and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are unrelated to the inflation of the US currency. However, the US Federal Reserve is also engaged in some pro-cyclic activities in an attempt first to get the US out of the most recent recession and then to keep the recovery going. That would be happening even if all of the US military was guarding airports in the US.

    1. Re:The real story on inflation by jimsum · · Score: 1

      In the long run, exchange rates are indeed based on different inflation rates. In the short run, the exhange rate is set by a market that takes about as much notice of the economy as the stock market.

      Right now, according to purchasing power parity (i.e. what it costs to buy equivalent goods in different countries), the Canadian dollar is undervalued by about 20%. So, we should expect the Canadian dollar to hit 0.85 at some point; and since inflation is higher in the U.S. right now, the Canadian dollar should go up even more.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
  121. What's the fuss? by gweihir · · Score: 1

    I am a Swiss federal employee, and I know my payday only roughly. I would not notice a day or two delay. I even think that they only pay me around the 20th so the money has reliably arrived by the end of the month.

    Be a little flexible here. Technology can always fail and a few days delay should not be a problem. Otherwise your dependency on technology can turn into a real problem.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  122. May be that will teach you-Two-income Experts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet the fact that most people have to have two incomes in order to survive, bothers no one. Let alone have enough to save up for that rainy day (even more money since it's two people now)

    Maybe we'll realize that something is fundamentally broken, and stop making excuses, and blaming the victums for everything (Yeh old, it's all your fault)

  123. What Software were they upgrading? by seanbo · · Score: 1

    Unix System V or SCO UnixWare? ;-)

  124. You bastards! by naoiseo · · Score: 1

    Hmm royal bank's computer systems are down, whats the best thing we could do? I know, let's slashfreakindot their webservers!

    I'll get paid sometime next week. Thanks.

  125. Similar but Smaller Problem April 8 @ Royal Bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a similar but smaller problem on April 8 (2004) that delayed postings by about half a day. It would be interesting to know the connection -- though doubtful it will ever come to light.

  126. and in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by the time slashdot picks the story up for the geek factor a week has gone by. way to be on the ball guys.

    no need to rtfa, its old news. money is safe and sound.

  127. May be that will teach you-Comuppance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I didn't say RBC wasn't a fault but shit does happen and you should be prepared for it. It's funny how people have money for video games, booze, SUVs, and phat stero systems but never enough for emergency savings."

    Oh lovely. A "everyone has money for video games, booze, SUVs, and phat stereo systems" but not anything "necessary" troll.

    You might want to sit down for this. Most people DO NOT own a SUV. Have a crappy K-Tel sound system. And their video games are bargin bin rejects. You NEED booze just to forget how much of a hell your life is (there's a reason russia has an alcohol problem).

    So continue with your middle-class myths that the rest of the world is simply living well, and your the only sense of reason in a mad world. I pray you never find out what real poverty (yes the most prosperous nation has poverty) is.

    1. Re:May be that will teach you-Comuppance. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I grew up in a poor family and lost my father while I was in the elementry school and lost my mother while I was in college. Thus, I didn't have wealthy parents (or even poor ones) to recieved help from and worked my ass off through college (also managed to rack up credit card debt as well). I'd say I am quite quite aware of that a real poverty. While I'm a geek by trade, I've started to learn about personal finance by reading books, taking classes, and visiting other website than Slashdot, Newsforge, Linux.com, groklaw, etc. Why? Because I don't want anyone else to go through what I went through because it does royally (no pun intended) suck to be in poverty.

      So go ahead and spread your garbage about how there's no hope and everyone should just give up (and last time I checked Canada isn't a third world country). So who ever's reading this, you have two chocies. You can either give up and whine or EDUCATE yourself. I recommand that you visit personal finance forums and find out how others like you dug themselfs out of debt pit and bankruptcies.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    2. Re:May be that will teach you-Comuppance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a hoot that the majority feeling of a story on Windows viruses is "damn lusers should patch their machines anyway" (i.e. individual can do something to avoid the problem if only they'd get off their fat arse and learn) and the majority feeling in this thread about a bit of individual financial planning is "fuck you, it's the big corporations' fault".

      Maybe Bull's right when he says that most professionals fall into the 'big brians, no bucks' category. They just don't realise it.

      I know that Slashdot is a a heterogeneous community etc, this is just an observation for my own amusement. And it is amusing.

  128. He/She must have handed you a reciept - check it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He/She must have handed you a reciept - check it

    (I'm going to get modded to -100..)

  129. Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for letting us know! We were all so worried and holding our breath waiting for you particularly to get paided (sic). Your good news is welcomed by all of us. We can now pick up the pieces and get on with our lives.

  130. Huh? by /dev/trash · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who lives paycheck to paycheck these days?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who lives paycheck to paycheck these days?
      You're kidding, right? Probably a large number of Canada's 16.1 million employed people. Probably an even larger number of Canada's 7.2% unemployed... [source]
  131. Technology by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I always cringe when I see some company hawking their latest, bleeding-edge, pre-beta technology as a solution to the world's problems. There are still many places where reliability, availability and stability are very important. What's wrong with mainframes and COBOL? Give me boring, standardized and obsolete any day, as long as it works.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  132. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Clod9 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This advice isn't bad as far as it goes, but it only gets you a one-month buffer.
    That's a highly desirable breathing space but still leaves you shackled to your paycheck. If you can learn discipline -- where "savings" means "that stack of money that keeps growing and that I will never touch unless my child is dying", you will be FREE.

    FREE, to take a six-month leave of absence to do something that's important to you.
    FREE, to quit the job that is making you ill with stress, even though you have no prospects at this time.
    FREE, where your boss and your company's CFO and any of the financial institutions you keep your money in -- all these have NO SAY in your life, except as far as you wish them to.

    You can't protect against everything, but 30K ought to be enough to get ahead. I started out at 15K a year in 1987, and gave some of that away to charities. I know what humble beginnings are like. ESCAPE THEM!

  133. EDI, plastic, automation by smarty_bones · · Score: 1

    One of our departments here does EDI transactions to debit customer accounts. Not that long ago, they sent a batch through where some of the accounts were duplicates - they'd already been sent the previous time. Result: some customer accounts got debited twice (and some accounts were credited). Not due to an upgrade, just staff error. But it was a clear reminder that many of these systems/processes are not engineered to prevent staff errors and too much still depends on manual steps to be taken. Anyway...for various reasons, I still like to get my paycheck in my hand in paper form, stop at the bank after work, keep some cash out, and get handed a paper receipt for the rest. YMAKT...if electronic purchasing fraud occurs, it's better if you've used a credit card than a debit card. Because the latter pulls the money from the account as your purchase clears, it's harder to get disputed amounts credited back.

  134. working at RBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the exec in the IT division is going to come out and say what the real problem was (they likely have not even told the business people the truth)...

    Rumour has it someone messed up the submission of a job on the mainframe... being RBC IT, there likely was no competent oversight... of course a better question is why was it not automated to begin with...

  135. my take: by jafac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Couldn't happen to a nicer, more deserving bunch of jerkwads.

    (/former field-support rep for a vendor, who got *burned* by the incompetence and mendacity of RBC IT personnel who lied to their manager, and my manager, when THEY screwed up their evaluation of our product - AFTER they had dragged the evaluation out past the 12-month mark. . . how the hell do you justify evaluating a product for 12 months?).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  136. 1 day's interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What is one day's interest on all of that money?
    They should make the software company pay for that and then they will think harder next time

  137. Yeah, watch it take off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unlike what would happen if a stupid Liberal were elected.

    Mod this anti-Bush troll down. His analysis of the currency movements is grossly oversimplified and merely an excuse to attack GWB.

  138. Weird but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RBC banking machine tells me that my bankbook is up to date. However if I look at the balance on the ATM screen it is higher by the amount of one of my latest withdrawls....which was recorded in my bankbook.
    If i try to update my bankbook which has the lower amount, the machine tells me that it is up to date (with the lower amount).
    Who should i believe? The bank's ATM should be right but something is still out of whack as the bank usually updates info immediately on their ATMs.....DAMN I SHOUD HAVE MADE A LARGER WITHDRAWL!!! :=)

  139. Obligatory Dilbert Quote by microTodd · · Score: 1

    Dilbert: "But what if we turn this on without testing and its doesn't work? Won't the results be catastrophic?"

    Ratbert the consultant: "Let me check my contract...nope, I still get paid the same."

    Dilbert: "Me, too."

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  140. I'm affected. by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

    My account has shown no activity since June 1, 2004. No, I take that back. I paid for lunch with my debit card, and this is reflected in my account balance.

    I got paid last night.. I think. (-: It doesn't show in my account. Meaning that the money (CERTAINLY debited from my employer) is in limbo, and RBC is probably making a LOAD of cash (in interest) on the "unclaimed" sums (think -- my pay, times 1million+ customers).

    But, here's what I'm thinking: since they are unable to report actual account balances in the ATMs, then the ATMs are likely unable to determine a lower bound on the account, meaning that I could withdraw my maximum, PAST the $0 limit, into the red (when everything syncs up again), all without overdraft.

    I _SUSPECT_ that RBC has put limits on maximum daily withdrawals for people normally without, until accounts start reporting properly.

    This note is currently attached to my online banking interface: "Due to a processing disruption, transactions made on June 2 and June 3, 2004 may not yet be reflected in your account balances. We expect your account balance will be updated by the end of this weekend. If you are experiencing any difficulties, please contact your branch, or account manager or 1800 Royal 1-1 (1800-769-2511). We apologize for this inconvenience. "

    More info here, here
    here here here and here.

    Last point: no idea why, but RY has climbed this week. Maybe I'm not so far off on the "free money" theory posted above.

    S

  141. Windows upgrade? by lwriemen · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.os2ezine.com/20030916/page_1.html RBC uses NCR computers running Windows. Maybe this is one of the systems affected by Microsoft's latest patch. They should follow the other Canadian banks and use OS/2.

  142. TDCT users take note... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, all TDCanadaTrust branches have been instructed to waive/refund NSF penalties stemming from this particular RBC fuckup... I mean, incident. But you MUST complain about it first. If you do nothing, they'll still whack you with the charge. Just ask to speak with someone and 'splain that your idiot employer (like mine) uses RBC and blah blah blah you bounced a cheque. They should waive the fee once RBC gets back on their feet and the money comes in.
    Its quite a nice little gesture from them, no? But *shhh* its supposed to be a secret memo for staff only.
    Yup, that's TDCT for ya: Doing the right thing (like CT), the wrong way (like TD). ;)

    1. Re:TDCT users take note... by hearingaid · · Score: 1
      Um, I'm a TDCT user... but:

      I was a Canada Trust customer way, way back in the eighties for a while (switched to Principal) and quit using them mainly because of no-notice service charges (i.e. they started applying service charges, didn't bother to let anyone know what they were first).

      I've now been with TD on and off since the early '90s (I went through a period when my main financial institution was a credit union, but I still had some dealings with TD) and they've been the kings of straightforward, even after the merger (which I admit to watching with some trepidation). So I'm not sure you're blaming the right half. ;)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  143. People should be angry lest we lose our democracy by FreeUser · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apologies for this offtopic post (soon to be modded -99 by those Republicans with moderator priveleges no doubt), but this comment, and the toxic meme it propogates, needs to be addressed.

    The USA would be a lot better place if you Democratic nutjobs would just let go

    No, it wouldn't.

    And I say this as one who did not vote for Gore, and who votes the issues, not the party (which means I vote as often Republican as I do Democratic ... although after this past four years that could very well change).

    Most people did what you advocated, and the results for America have been disasterous. We have overextended our military, spent ourselves into a deficit we may never recover from, lost virtually all of our world prestige, the vast majority of our close allies (alliances that had lasted more than half a century burned up in just four years of GW Bush's rule), and all of our credibility in the rest of the world. The list goes on, but I think you probably get the point.

    Indeed, the USA would be a better place if people had taken to the streets or risen up in outright revolt after the Republicans stole the election and discarded the expressed will of the American people, as it was cast at the ballot office (including Florida, which a full statewide recount sponsored by the media demonstrated conclusively that Gore had won. As an aside, it is interesting how the domestic media then unreported and spun their own study to favor Bush, while their overseas collegues reported it more accurately. Go figure.)

    Undermining the democratic process, as the Republicans and their supreme court appointees did in 2000, is terribly destructive irrespective of the qualifications of the usurpur who governs thereafter. The damage to our institutions is quite severe and will be quite long lasting, not least of which because the last branch of our government that had, to all appearances, remained somewhat unsullied by politics, namely the Judicial, has shown itself at its highest levels to be more interested in paying back political favors than ruling sensibly on constitutional law. (Yes, I've actually read their decision. Have you? It is the most convulated series of transparent justifications for violating the intent and will of the constitution and the American voters I've ever read ... and that is saying a lot.)

    Of course, in this case we've ended up with an incompetent usurpur to boot, who used his artificially inflated legitimacy post 9/11 to prosecute an unrelated war against his family's enemy in Iraq, thereby overextending the US military and quite possibly costing us a victory in the real war we should be fighting, namely the War on Terror (hint: Afghanistan, NOT Iraq, although Bush's activities have certainly made Iraq from an inhospitable secular environment for Al Q'aide into a veritable breeding ground and ideal staging area ... thanks Mr. President).

    - lose the rhetoric and actually address issues people are concerned about. If that had actually happened in 2000 Al Gore would be president right now.

    "People" are concerned about the economy and how much gasoline for the SUVs costs. We have very systematically and very effectively dumbed down our population, to the point where an election can be stolen out from under their noses and their main concern will be "but will this preempt my Saturday afternoon sports, Friends, or Everybody Loves Raymond?"

    Gore wasn't my choice, and had I been selecting the party nominee Kerry probably wouldn't have been my choice either. Both are vastly more competent than the current usurpur, however, but more importantly than that, we need a return to constitutional law in this country.

    That means an end to midnight raids on people's homes, an end to detention without due process, an end to dismissing and violating the Geneva conventions, an end to operating concentration camps of any kind, including Guantanamo, even if it is aimed at scum like

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  144. Who does this really affect? by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    The sad reality is that those who do live paycheck to paycheck (the poor), are hardest hit by this snafu.

    The banks position is "if you're hurt, let us know by bringing in proof."

    How about the RBC chair bend over so I can shove my foot up his arse and tickle his tonsils with my toes - "Does that hurt Mr. Guy Saint-Pierre? Cause that's how most of your customers feel right now..."


    RBC should stand for Rude Bank C**ts - yes, it is the C word Virginia.

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
  145. You are famous! by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    Somebody quoted you over on the Yahoo SCOX board a little while ago. Way to go!

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  146. GET BACK TO WORK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  147. Holy crap? by Larmal · · Score: 1

    When did Terry and Deaner get jobs at RBC?

  148. Something I didn't see mentioned... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    One or two days of delaying people their money results in more interest that the bank makes because it is holding onto the money (float time). So the bank might show a profit.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  149. Bank Computers and Office Hours by Tripster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing I've never understood about bank computers, why is it they don't do transactions outside banking hours when it involves putting money INTO your account?

    Sure I can make a deposit at an ATM and have it instantly accessable, but what I am talking about is between bank transfers and such, for some reason these seem to take place only on weekdays.

    Is there really some peon sitting in front of a terminal approving every transaction?

    What peeves me is when I have something being transferred from say my merchant account, it can take 5 business days to get to my account, I mean these are computers we're talking about here and that type of delay really makes no sense when we live in a world where instant transactions are available.

    I've seen stuff start transfer on a Wednesday and take until the following Tuesday to show in the account, that is just sad.

    1. Re:Bank Computers and Office Hours by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting


      "I've seen stuff start transfer on a Wednesday and take until the following Tuesday to show in the account, that is just sad."

      It would be sadder if the transfer was instant, but turned out 5 days later to have been bogus, and they take the money out of your account. Oh, you emptied your account already? Don't you see the problem from the bank's point of view? Maybe everybody who has ever written a check to YOU has been good for it, but the bank hasn't been that lucky, and neither have I.

      The alternative is to take responsibility for what is deposited into your account. If you get a bad check, it's your problem, not the bank's.

      Would you rather wait 5 days and have a guarantee of your cash, or would you rather vouch for every instrument presented in order to get your cash earlier? You can probably arrange it like that with your bank.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Bank Computers and Office Hours by Tripster · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood me, I am talking about bank transfers which these days should be almost purely electronic in nature and should happen almost instantly, or at most within 24 hours.

      I do understand the need to be careful with cheque deposits, but the fact is I can run down to my nearest ATM, insert an empty envelope claiming to be a deposit of $1000 and withdraw it immediately.

      If I have immediate clearance on cheques up to $1000 then why does clearance of funds going between reputable banks take 5-7 days? Especially when we're talking about accounts I've had for a number of years already with no bounced cheques at all.

    3. Re:Bank Computers and Office Hours by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      Having worked for a bank, I can tell you that it is in the bank's interest (pun intended) to sit on your money for as long as possible while calling it their money. That way they get the interest. You may not think that the interest on your $1000 is all that much, but you're only one depositor. To a large bank the overnight interest on several billion dollars is a hefty chunk of change.

      If they can pretend your money is their money for 2 or 3 extra days, they make out like bandits. (Again, pun intended).

      The business climate in banking these days has put the squeeze on everyone. If you're getting "free" checking or special low interest rates, your bank is making up for it in one way or another. Deposit "float" is just one way. This doesn't arouse too much customer ire.

      Another more ire-prone tactic is to sort the day's debits (checks) by decreasing amounts so an overdraft will cause more checks to bounce and thereby generate more overdraft fees. (Yes, they do that sort on purpose.)

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  150. THERE'S A RUN ON THE RBC RIGHT NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not kidding there's a huge line up out the door because everyone and their dog is trying to get moola for the weekend!!! Gawd I'm glad I don't bank with them!

  151. As an RBC customer... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

    ...I am really pissed off.

    I get paid weekly on every Thursday, and I expected my account to have my pay deposited by payroll. I go to the doctor and had to pay for a non-essential medical examination, and I found out I had insufficient funds. Hence, I ended up using my Visa card to pay for the examination.

    I would be a bit happier if RBC was willing to kill some of my service fees this month, but seeing their customer service track record gets a bit shoddy every other year, I doubt that'll happen.

  152. Re:People should be angry lest we lose our democra by forn28 · · Score: 1

    WOW!!!! Very good analysis of the situation.

  153. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by danharan · · Score: 1

    Good god, you're making $30k at 20, and looking for sympathy?

    1- Get rid of the car. Move closer to work if necessary, or find work closer to home.
    2- Tell your leech of a GF to pay her share of the rent or move the hell out of your appartment and your life.

    30k is a fair chunk of money. I can live very comfortably on half that while still making student loan payments. Of course, I have roommates and no car, but can still afford to eat out several times a week.

    If I were making more money, I'd be saving it for a downpayment on a house, not on car, insurance and girls. The way you're going, you'll always be poor.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  154. RBC & BofM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would have been more fun if they let them merge, I bet.

  155. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Only someone on slashdot would wonder WHAT TO DO with the SO.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  156. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lose the GF, view free porn sites. Lose the cable, again.. porn sites, or borrow satellite TV. Re-negotiate a cheaper rent by letting cockroaches or mice loose in the apartment and complaining, then re-collecting them after your landlord has left, or find a cheaper place. Learn to cook, you'll save a lot of money compaired to going out to eat, and you'll live better. Learn to steal. Remeber, everything is cheap if you steal it. Sell things. Lots of things. Other people's things. Mr. Noodle sandwiches are tasty and cheap. Gas is only expensive if you buy it during the daytime, with plates on your car. Drive less, walk/ride bike more. Mooch rides as much as possible. Eat at parent's house, friends houseses, relatives houses and strangers houses... Often. Don't keep pets. If you must keep pets, get really big pets that you can charge admission to see. Like Polar Bears.. Most appartments have a no dog/cat clause.. But they always forget the polar bears. And if the landlord says anything about it, introduce him to your big, white, deadly friend. This will save on rent for a while too. Oh, and wear sunscreen.

  157. Re:This is why I keep a couple weeks worth of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure I would have started by calling the FBI from day one. I hope you didn't sign anything releasing these people from damages.

    They probably owe you interest for the days they held your money without consent. You might could even stick them with felony fraud charges even if they "straightened out" your situation.

    They stole your money, and gave it back when you brought it to their attention. How would they have treated you if the roles were reversed?

  158. What OS doe they use? by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the main Operating System is that RBC depends on?

    1. Re:What OS doe they use? by LemonYellow · · Score: 2, Informative

      A combination of Win2k, Solaris, Linux (various distributions) and VMS.

  159. Bank error in your favor by HFShadow · · Score: 1

    I'm not complaining, I made a $500 deposit to my account and it showed up twice. I guess I'll wait a week or two and see if they notice :)

  160. Re:Royal Karma by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

    Hmmm ING Direct is looking better every day...

    --
    Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
    Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
  161. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >If you can learn discipline -- where "savings"
    >means "that stack of money that keeps growing and
    >that I will never touch unless my child is dying"

    That's a good strategy and everything, but I learned that it would be better to go ahead and let that savings account go to about zero, if I can use it to get completely out of debt.

    If I had a "child is dying" incident, I'm sure it will mean going into debt anyway, and it can't hurt to have zero debt in a situation like that.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  162. Similar situation.. by MadHungarian · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, during a Memorial Day weekend, I needed cash so I went down to my local bank's ATM - it didn't work. I went to another bank, willing to pay the service charges, I got some cryptic error message. Come to find out, at 4:00 pm on the Friday before the weekend, my bank rolled a a new verstion of the ATM software to both the ATM's and the host! I offered my services as a
    computer consultant to help them plan future upgrades.

  163. Re:Royal Karma by grozzie2 · · Score: 4, Informative
    These are the same assholes that were SCO's top investor.

    This has been widely mis-reported. RBC doesn't make such investments themselves, they act as the broker on behalf of clients, exactly the same as any other brokerage. In the case in question, the client chose to remain anonymous, and the shares in question were purchased by RBC, and then held 'in street name' for assignment to an internal client account. The actual details of who the account holder is, are protected by confidentiality laws, and would only become public information if the client requested certificates of shares issued in thier own name, rather than held by the brokerage in street name on thier behalf. the courts can also order such disclosures, but will only do so if there is a real requirement for said disclosure. In this case, there is no requirement for disclosure.

    RBC has recieved a lot of negative exposure in the linux community simply because they have respected privacy laws. They acted as the broker in the transaction, and held the shares on behalf of a client. I'd commend the bank, in the face of a lot of pressure, never once have they released or leaked to the public the name of the client they are acting on behalf of. This is as it should be.

    The real question in my mind, what individual/corporation outsourced this transaction to Canada, to take advantage of privacy laws that allowed them to do the entire deal anonymously, with the bank acting as the publicly visible broker of record?

  164. RBC: are they the scumbags who ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is RBC the bank that financed SCO?

    They are establishing quite a reputation for cluelessness. Let's hope they lose all their customers because of the latest screwup, and go out of business.

  165. Re:Eh by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    YOU DIPSHIT UNIVERSALLY STUPID ASSHOLE!!!!! I have never in my entire life heard any of my fellow Canadians say EH at the end of every sentence. I personally hate beer and wish it would go the same place as you HELL.

    --
    Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
    Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
  166. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1
    First of all, at only 21 years old time is on your side. Any money that you can put away before you're 30 should, with the magic of compound interest, be worth almost 10 times as much if you put away the same amount of money after you're fifty. (This assumes that you have your debt under control. If not, knock it out first.)

    Live below your means. Put off that new car or computer for another year or two. Eat out 1 fewer times per week. Don't pay so much for your porn! Simple things like that can easily add up to one hundred bucks per month with very little pain.

    Time is on your side. Start saving now. Be patient. It will grow very slowly at first. But the earlier you start, the earlier your savings will start growing rapidly.

    Peter

  167. Blame it on Microsoft. by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

    No really. Is it a coincidence that one of the only banks in Canada to switch from IBM OS/2 to Windows is the one that was hit?
    TD Waterhouse is still on OS/2. As is Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, and I believe CIBC.

    Also, a while back, their ATM's were the only ones affected by the worms. You guessed it, also switched to NT-based ATM machines.

  168. Real Money. by The+Shadow · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the time I tried to pay for my tuition with my MBNA Mastercard. I had payed it off 3 days earlier using Scotia Bank's online system, which is supposed to only take 48 hours to process.

    When I went to pay, the charge was denied, so I called the complaint line. The guy said that while the electronic payment went through yesterday, and interest would be calculated based on that, they couldn't clear my account until acual money was tranfered from Scotia Bank. This blew me away! I've been in many situations where the bank isn't sure the check I'm depositing is good, but in this case, MBNA was essentially saying that they weren't sure Scotia Bank was good for it.

    The customer support guy manually cleared it for me, in the end, but I still think its funny that there really is some armored car somewhere driving between Scotia and MBNA when I make payments on my card.

  169. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by xutopia · · Score: 1

    Get rid of your day to day expenses such as cable and car if you can go without it. Also your gf should save you money not cost you money. Mine pays half of everything because she lives with me. If yours costs you money I'd worry sick.

  170. Re:Bigger Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > Based on my experience in Canadian banking (7 years) plus stories of old timers, this is the worst outage in close to 10 years, maybe the worst in 20 if my rumours prove to be true. I have no direct mainframe experience, though, so take my descripton of the problems with a grain of salt...

    To the extent that you feel it safe and/or appropriate to discuss the issue, there's a bigger question: What options, if any, are open for consideration (or are being quietly taken) at the central bank level to ensure continued liquidity and a happy clearing system?

  171. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For most things you find in your home, if you haven't used it in 3mo, then you don't need to keep it around.
    Yep, haven't used the skis in 3 months. Time to sell 'em. Same for my coat. Alas, I can't find my swimsuit. Oh, now I remember, I sold it 6 months ago.
  172. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live 0.5 miles from work. I ride my bike to work. My G/F lives in a city 60 miles from home. Thats a 120 Mile round trip 8 times a month. Thats $10 each time. Thats $80 in gas because of her. She doesnt share rent, she doesnt live with me. I pay for everything because I'm the "rich computer guy" and shes the "poor college girl". I'm trying to save for a downpayment but I'm not ready to settle down anywhere yet as I dont know where my life might lead. I think I'm figuring out where the financial problems are and they all lead one direction. Thanks for the advice.

  173. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm worried sick. I'm on the /. therapy line and so far the advice has been great. I need to loose the g/f (who doesnt live with me, doesnt help financially in any way) and stick it out living cheap for a while. Thanks for the advice.

  174. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats that supposed to mean?

  175. You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for offshore Indian software development...

  176. Paided? Is that you, Jamie Baillie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the inane copyright disclaimer on your /. posts? Oh, I forgot, sigs are limited to 120 characters...

  177. Re:Royal Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the CANADA.COM article:

    "Royal Bank customers should visit their bank branches in person if they detect problems because of the processing delay or contact the bank's 24-hour number."

    '24-hour' is how long you'll be on hold..?

  178. Yeah it's true by Guy+G · · Score: 1

    If I look at the balance on the RBC ATM screen it is higher than my updated bankbook by the amount of one of my latest withdrawls....which was recorded in my bankbook. If i try to update my bankbook which has the lower amount, the machine tells me that it is up to date (with the lower amount). What should i believe? The bank's ATM should be right but something is still out of whack as the bank usually updates info immediately on their ATMs.....DAMN I SHOUD HAVE MADE A LARGER WITHDRAWL or something!!! :=) They are now saying that things will be back in order by the weekend.

    1. Re:Yeah it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian banks suck. I had a similar situation. Go to online banking. Check my balance. Website says: FREE (= not locked) balance = 220. I go to ATM. ATM says balance is 220. Try to withdraw 200. INSUFFICIENT FUNDS. Arrrgh! Go home. Call "customer service specialist" (=young kid who calls me 'You Guys'). Explanation: "you must be wrong - our ATM's are right". Am pissed off. Go to bank. Talk to teller. He finds out that a cheque is on hold. WTF!
      - why does online banking website say 'free balance' while it is not?
      - why does ATM says that I can withdraw 220 when I cannot?
      - why does 'Mrs YouGuy' not know the answer?

      CANADIAN BANKS SUCK! I HOPE THEY WILL ALL BE UTTERLY DESTROYED BY FOREIGN (=MUCH MORE EFFICIENT) BANKS. Canadian banks are LAZY, too expensive and should be wiped out of existence.

  179. Re:Eh by h00dLuM · · Score: 1

    I'm Canadian and I work in RBC IT and your post was hilarious. Bob and Doug? Yeah!!!
    To my pissed off Canuck bro, that was funny, just laugh. SCTV is classic.

  180. Candain Banks are great by Liquiddarknessvi · · Score: 0

    Our banks are awesome. It could have happened to anyone. In fact our banks are so great that in 1930 when the stock market crashed and the world was sent into the depression only one candian bank went out of business. 100's of American banks went under. The reason that only one Canadian bank went under was because of bank chains (something American banks have only reasently caught on to). The Canadian dollar has and will be again higher then the US. The fact is that we have a better economy and we will continue to if we elect Martin. So vote liberal on the 28th and we will see who has the big scary dollar.

    --
    Geek Code Version 3.0 GSS d? s++ :++ a--- C++++ UL+ P L+++ E W+++ N+ O? K- W--- O- M+ V-- PS--- PE--
  181. June 2, 2004 Transactions still outstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    June 2, 2004 as still outstanding as of 11:23pm June 4, 2004.

    They are trying to balance....

  182. Re:Royal Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ING Direct - my experience is that they are a bunch of pompous idiots. Will never deal with them.

  183. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possibly the most funny post ever. I've reposted it in my MySpace blog. (I've provided a link to the original, of course. Credit where credit is due.) It isn't as good as being modded up, of course, but it's something... I wish you hadn't posted anonymously. Then I could make you my friend.

  184. Re:Eh by dave1212 · · Score: 1

    Hey buddy, lighten up, eh?

  185. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the great great grand-poster and I wasnt sure if it was insightful or funny. Actually, come to think of it, I think i might take his advice. Whats your blog url?

  186. Re:As one who is just making it by I offer this ad by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    putting money into savings instead of spending it on basic necessities supports the capitalist social-ecconomic practice that makes you unfree in the first place.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  187. In the face of a lot of pressure? by hearingaid · · Score: 1
    Assuming you're correct, then by releasing the names they'd be violating the Bank Act. That Act controls all chartered banks here in Canada, and if you violate it, there are criminal penalties & what's more, theoretically anyway, it's possible for a bank to lose its charter.

    We live in a land of regulated banks. I do note, however, that your version of the story is not one I've seen anywhere else. Certainly RBC is (a) a gang of idiots, and (b) like any other bank, they act as a VC, and make investments for themselves. So what's your basis for the claim that they were acting as a broker in this case? (Which they also do, of course.)

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    1. Re:In the face of a lot of pressure? by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      So what's your basis for the claim that they were acting as a broker in this case? (Which they also do, of course.)

      That's really simple, look at the name in all the released documents. The company name is the name of thier brokerage division. If they were making the investment directly thru one of the investment divisions, the name of record would be the name of one of thier investment funds, which are public entities, and do not invest anonymously. The portfolio holdings of the various investment funds are a matter of public record.

      The other detail that most /. types really dont understand, the interest in SCOX shares on the open market is driven by prudent fund managers, as much as speculative investors. The numbers are easy to calculate. In the unlikely event that sco were to win the lawsuit against ibm, ibm would be looking at taking a 2 billion dollar charge at a future quarterly or annual report. A 2 billion dollar charge will have a measurable effect on ibm share prices, and a 2 billion dollar gain has a measurable effect on the price of SCOX shares. It's a simple matter of calculating the ratio of SCOX to IBM shares that one must hold, to totally offset any risk. Funds with large ibm holdings therefore were prudent to hedge the risks early on. The same can be said of funds with large holdings in redhat. In the event of an sco win, redhat share prices will approach zero, it becomes simple arithmetic to calculate how many SCOX shares a portfolio requires to offset any risk from that event.

      This is prudent risk management because there is no logic to how the us courts come to decisions on things like this, and it's like playing the lottery to try second guess the outcome. Managers are much better off to do the homework, establish the effects such a suit would have on the bottom line for both companies in either outcome, and then plan thier holdings for both events, and basically carry some SCOX stock as an insurance policy against the worst case outcome. Consider it as just that, an insurance policy, something that you pay for, and hope you never cash in on it, but it's a cost of doing business. The SCOX shares are expected to ultimately head to zero as a final value, but, they are held on the off chance there is a miracle in court, and the ibm/redhat holdings end up taking a huge loss because of it. The SCOX holdings will offset that loss at that time. It's a logical hedge against stupidity by the american courts, which has been demonstrated over and over many times.

  188. But which side is heads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did put a quarter of a buck on the 25 cent piece.

  189. "Wizz-Bang4000 on pricewatch for only $499" by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The last paragraph is what prompted my response and due to its content it doesn't sound like its 'just bills' to me. It sounds like you have issues not buying the latest and greatest toy if you have cash in the bank.

    It may have only been an example, but it appeared that you were discussing your habits, in context.. however if it is only about bills and you are living beyond your means, the same basic statement I made applies anyway.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----