Slashdot Mirror


Dr. Pepper Tries New Astroturf Method

glh writes "Blogging continues to make its way into corporate America. Dr. Pepper is now blogging to build a community around their new dairy based Raging Cow product by using "key influence bloggers". The key influence bloggers are currently made up of six people mostly in their late teens/early twenties who get promo merchandise as their only form of compensation. In return, they get to "advertise however they want" through their blog. Seems like this experiment could turn into the next "big thing" in advertising-- assuming people are willing to sell out their blog space. Bloggers beware!"

437 comments

  1. /. beat them to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, but we're already hosting blog-ads here @ slashdot. Nothing to see here, move along. :P

    1. Re:/. beat them to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that Apple has been paying people to promote their products here.

      You stupid fucks are getting paid aren't you?

  2. Uh.. by doubleyewdee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I claim this fp in the name of.. uh.. Radiohead! New album? Eh? Eh?

    --


    you can take the road that takes you to the stars...
  3. Where do I sign up? by GothChip · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd happily write about Dr Pepper each day I was sent a crate.

    1. Re:Where do I sign up? by bsharitt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, I'll sell space on my Slashdot journal.

    2. Re:Where do I sign up? by LordFlower · · Score: 5, Funny

      it seems slashdot has signed up already

    3. Re:Where do I sign up? by namespan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And this is almost symbiotic and worthwhile. If you *really* like a product, I don't see why it would be anything but worthwhile to everybody accept compensation for endorsing it.

      Think of your favorite computing language/OS/Environment, for an example. I'll happily go on and on about Mac OS X, for example. If Apple gave me free stuff for evangelizing, it wouldn't change that.

      The only real concern I can think of: I will also grumpilly go on and on about OS X as well. Perhaps they wouldn't like that. Perhaps no free stuff anymore if I did that. But that really wouldn't be all that different than what's happening today. :)

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    4. Re:Where do I sign up? by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 5, Funny

      No reason to sell your blog. Be like all the other nitwits and sell Amway instead.

      I went to a guys apartment to watch De La Hoya box on pay per view and there was a bunch of seedy fucks there trying to make me sell Amway for them. Total setup from the get go.

      They asked everyone in the room "what would you do with a million dollars?" when it was my turn to answer I said "I would become a heavily armed recluse in a sparsely populated western state with intention of training disciples to dispatch of pyramid growth scams".

      It was like ... a minute before any of those morons said their next word. I was nearly out the door by the time the guy said "...but we are not a pyramid growth scam".

      I went to a bar and watched the fight with people that were not wanna-be corporate scumbags. Definitely one of my finest hours.

    5. Re:Where do I sign up? by MarkGriz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe they should change the name of their blog from ragingcow.com to slashcow.com

      Slashcow
      --------
      Pissing and Moaning, and free stuff too!

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    6. Re:Where do I sign up? by Asprin · · Score: 5, Informative


      And this is almost symbiotic and worthwhile. If you *really* like a product, I don't see why it would be anything but worthwhile to everybody accept compensation for endorsing it.

      And life just gets more and more like TV: Now, I have to consider whether my family/friends/coworkers are "gettin' paid" before I take them up on that recommendation to see "Master Of Disguise II".

      Thanks, but no thanks. I like to think that my wife's-best-friend's movie recommendations suck because she has bad taste.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    7. Re:Where do I sign up? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      I think it's a great idea.

      Hey kids! C'mon, it's the neat new thing!
      Sell your soul and become a media whore!
      Rock & Roll(TM)!

      Rock & Roll(TM) is a Trademark of Satan Inc.
      Selling your Soul is a patented business method, patented by Amazon.com and licensed to Satan Inc.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    8. Re:Where do I sign up? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Ok, so media whore, should really be corporate whore.

      My bad.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    9. Re:Where do I sign up? by eyeball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And life just gets more and more like TV: Now, I have to consider whether my family/friends/coworkers are "gettin' paid" before I take them up on that recommendation to see "Master Of Disguise II".

      Maybe it's a good thing to question everyone's motives in everything they say to you, regardless them being an advertiser, a teacher, a government, a religeous leader, a web log. Asking "why are they telling me this."

      Why am I telling you this?

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    10. Re:Where do I sign up? by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Informative
      Had one like that. Friend of mine from college who I even lived with at one point came over to visit. The Wife is out of town and he's just hanging out until he meets someone else. So at one point he asks if he can show me a video - saying that he's going to show this tape to the person he's meeting and if that meeting falls through then at least he can still write the trip off as a business expense. Seems odd, but okay - this guy was always a little off anyway.

      The video is for QuikStar (sp?), which is this deal where you start your own web business selling things like soap and toilet paper. Or something. At this point I of course realized I was being pseudo-scammed.

      Since this guy was a friend and it was my house, it's not like I could leave. So I sat there and asked him why I would buy soap and toilet paper online instead of Wal-Mart and he had some sorta valid reasonings (like bulk) but I really don't want to plan out my soap buying that far in advance. When I asked him how it is that so many online businesses could succeed against each other (see Herbalife) he kept diverting the question.

      I basically let the conversation die without giving him a yes or no answer as to whether this would be something I'd want to do. A friend of mine got into it with him (the contact he was in town to meet, I think) and shortly thereafter was doing everything in his power to get out of it.

      Ironically, Quikstar is associated with Amway.

    11. Re:Where do I sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we should all be paranoid! Report all suspicious activity to Homeland Security at once!

    12. Re:Where do I sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Maybe it's a good thing to question everyone's motives in everything they say to you, regardless them being an advertiser, a teacher, a government, a religeous leader, a web log. Asking "why are they telling me this."
      >
      > Why am I telling you this?

      If I were to ask you, you'd probably I was giving you the 33rd degree or something. (Whups, 3rd degree. Typo. Honest. *g* :)

    13. Re:Where do I sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quixtar.com , its for people who are too lazy or have too much self-respect to go to wal-mart.

      the prices are ok, its about the same price as buying it at the store (with shipping) (clothes, food, appliances, etc) so whats the diff? there is a minimum purchase (rated in points) so its like costco (with a montly fee)...

      i'm the offspring of a quixtar user, i dont care what people use. i'd say stores are better because at least then you have competition and sales... of course, you also have markup and MSRP.

      i believe people have lost thier spines in evolution. no one says no anymore. and sales people dont take no for an answer. its bull#$%^

    14. Re:Where do I sign up? by stripes · · Score: 1
      And life just gets more and more like TV: Now, I have to consider whether my family/friends/coworkers are "gettin' paid" before I take them up on that recommendation to see "Master Of Disguise II".

      You aready do. There are a lot of products that have referal programs (for example the phone company I use will give you and I both $40 worth of service if you mention my name when you sign up -- p.s. it's a great service, you should buy it, I'm sure it will be just perfect for you. what are you waiting for? Buy! Buy! Buy!). Other products that I just happen to like, but don't seem to get as much traction in the market place as I think they need, I might go out and shill for them in the hopes that they get enough busness to stay afloat (you need a TiVo, really, go get one, or another one as appropriate, hurry! Stores might run out! Don't get cought in a shortage!).

    15. Re:Where do I sign up? by Asprin · · Score: 4, Funny


      Why am I telling you this?

      I don't know about you, but I was karma whoring. ;)








      (It *worked*, too, though I was shooting for 'funny', not 'informative'.)

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    16. Re:Where do I sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a good thing to question everyone's motives in everything they say to you, regardless them being an advertiser, a teacher, a government, a religeous leader, a web log. Asking "why are they telling me this."

      Alterior motives weaving through society, some generated by mother nature, some by man, some by madness. But they are there. Those subtle messages contrived to make people do and think certain things. Subtle rewards and punishments delivered through all channels a human being uses to interface with the world.

    17. Re:Where do I sign up? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Ah, the deluge of asinine moderators. I could have sworn (the ironically named) eyeball was trying to be funny as well.

    18. Re:Where do I sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alterior motives weaving through society

      I believe the word you are searching for is Ulterior.

      Really. Unless you're making your own language as you go....

  4. Raging Cow? by wembley · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they don't try to launch that brand in the U.K.

    --

    Share and Enjoy!

    1. Re:Raging Cow? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's exactally the mental image I had at reading "Raging Cow". A temper-challenged bovine with vertical hold problems. Betcha that'll sell well in the UK.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Raging Cow? by genesplicer · · Score: 1

      How about "Flaming Sheep"?
      Livestock certainly has it tough in the UK ...

      --
      Me? Debunk an American myth? And take my life in my hands?
    3. Re:Raging Cow? by redbaron7 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Considering that Dr.Pepper/7-Up is owned by Cadbury-Schweppes, it is probably a marketing joke...


      RB

    4. Re:Raging Cow? by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      That, and it's a clear ripoff of 'Red Bull'.

    5. Re:Raging Cow? by wembley · · Score: 1

      True. They are the same people who created the 'clucking bunny' for their Easter ads.

      --

      Share and Enjoy!

    6. Re:Raging Cow? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps "Surrendering Frog"?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  5. I'll do it! by govtcheez · · Score: 1

    Shit, if it gets me free Dr. Pepper, I'll be a shill.

    1. Re:I'll do it! by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Me too. I once had so many cans on my desk that my colleague said it was a shrine to "The good Dr."

      Although It's not good fo me I have shunned long life in exchange for instant gratification in the form of sugar and caffeine. Hell, I'd be a Dr. Pepper "Evangelist" if they supplied me with a 2 cases a week.

    2. Re:I'll do it! by Vann_v2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can anyone who claims to be a Dr Pepper fan spell it "Dr. Pepper?" This is a sad day.

    3. Re:I'll do it! by dacarr · · Score: 1

      You Dr. Pepper whore! *hides a case or three of the stuff behind his desk*

      --
      This sig no verb.
    4. Re:I'll do it! by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I have disgraced myself and should be punished by flogging via the official Dr Pepper cane.

      Proceed

  6. Look, Dr. Pepper has a PhD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure he knows what he's doing.

  7. Where do I sign up? by doublem · · Score: 2, Funny

    YES! A way to piss and moan to all the world and GET STUFF at the same time!

    Yes!

    Where do I sign up?

    My LiveJournal is so sold out.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  8. Advertising: Nothing new by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just more of the same ol' story: companies sticking their advertisements everywhere: cramming every possible orifice full of their logo. Now instead of being obnoxiously located above, below, and to the sides of all the content your reading on the net: it will now be located inside the content.

    George Carlin was right.. bend over a little more..

    1. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > bend over a little more..

      wait, you mean people actually read weblogs?!

      at any rate I would hazard that there's very little "bending over" going on here. Free expression and advertising are generally at odds with each other, and I'll hazard this is going to die a wimpering death.

      By their very nature, blogs will resist corporate subversion.

    2. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Triv · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ever been to New York City?

      ClearChannel Communications (my current nemesis of choice) has such a strong foothold in NYC it's scary. Want to listen to the radio? Most of the radio stations are run by clearchannel. See a show? They own broadway theaters. See a concert? Irving Plaza and Roseland (among others) are run by clearchannel. Avoid all that and take a walk? They own a good portion of the billboards. Take the subway instead? Sorry, the advertising in the subways (including the new digital billboards cropping up around certain subway lines) goes through them too.

      Gives a new meaning to the word "Tentacle," don't it?

      Triv

      (It's not as scary as what I saw a few months ago, though - a Post Office truck with a big honkin' Microsoft MSN ad on the side.)

    3. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by JimDabell · · Score: 4, Funny

      wait, you mean people actually read weblogs?!

      ...he posted to slashdot.

    4. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not posting as my username, as a significant portion of my livelihood is due directly to ClearChannel, but I totally agree. They have a monopoly on radio and concerts across the country. They've done it through consolidation, buying up every radio station and concert promoter in the country. It wasn't really any different a few years ago though, ClearChannel just added radio stations to the mix. They're also generally good to artists (payola, concert revenues, etc) and are willing to do anything that sells, not just promote the latest act. Can't really fault them for that, they're in the business to make money.

    5. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by program21 · · Score: 3, Funny

      On my way to work from the PA Bus Terminal, I walk past a billboard - "How many ways has Clear Channel reached you today?"

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    6. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One great big festering neon distraction *whisper* Dr. Pepper *whisper*, I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied. Learn to swim. Mom's gonna fix it all soon. Mom's comin' round to put it back the way it ought to be. Learn to swim." - TooL, Ænema from Ænima

    7. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out www.wearcam.org

      Steve Mann is trying to develop a system that ERASES advertisments from our daily lives ... kinda like a junkbuster for the real world.

      cool idea, but technology is way too behind to make it happen yet.

    8. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not as scary as what I saw a few months ago, though - a Post Office truck with a big honkin' Microsoft MSN ad on the side.

      Thank God the words "powered by" were not preceeding the ad, otherwise my snail mail would be as fcuked up as my hotmail account.

    9. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Interesting
      To be honest, I would prefer more advertising like this vs the flashy blinky noisy things all over the fscking place.

      This is akin to product placement, and I would rather my favorite actor, Bob Dole, or whoever to casually use a product in my view while not disturbing the plot or whatever else I'm doing.

      However, the problem is that everywhere I go, and everything I do is now inundated with advertisements. This is complete bullshit. I for the most part ignore advertisements. Besides the psychological, subconscious affects of advertising. (eg, Product X is a good company because we give back to the community, or simply product recognition), I don't see where advertising has any influence on my spending habits. And the few times that it has, I have felt burnt most of those times.

      Here's a list of advertising bullshit that bothers me to no end:
      • There's too much of it in magazines, I can't find the table of contents so I can read what I bought the magazine for.
      • Ticketmaster advertises. These assholes are already charging me for the priveledge of buying a ticket, and they have the nerve to charge for advertising space too!
      • Endlessly repeating .gif's or flash ads. I've got galeon set up to only repeat animation once, and I don't have a flast plugin, thank you.
      • TV music programs where they play an ad between each song
      • The amount of ads on cable television in general. What do I pay $40 a month for?
      • A local university got $10 million from a car dealership to rent their name out on their new football stadium. I will not buy a car from them ever. If it had something to do with education, fine, but all I read from the car dealers actions is that they already make way too much money.

      There must be more, I just can't think of them right now.

      I guess that advertising is like spam, it exists because there must be some kind of reward for doing it. I ignore it. Word of mouth works fine. Believe me I trust someone I know much more than some washed up actor/athlete/Bob Dole pushing a product on me because they say they like the product. I feel as though ads are insulting, because I can go to a store and evaluate products or ask a sales person, or read up on a product beforehand. Bah, I've gone on too long already.
    10. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How DARE those evil companies even try to advertise to you! The NERVE!!!

    11. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by MisterMook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Part of the idea of ad marketing is not that a viewer actually likes the product but that they see the name so much that when the time comes to purchase a product the consumer automatically thinks of the marketer's product. There might be dozens of chicken restaurants in town, but when crunch time comes and the consumer is trying to think "where will I eat right now" they can't come up with a better solution than KFC, Churches, or Popeyes. Word of mouth might be a better solution to judging value, but advertising doesn't attach itself to better solutions it attaches itself to recognition.

      That's the reason commercials are sometimes cute and that you even KNOW Bob Dole does commercials, recognition. At some point eventually you run into an area that word of mouth doesn't cover, that's where advertising works best.

      Strangely enough, in the hermit-media culture we live in advertising has it's best chance. People work at home or don't talk with their coworkers very much, when they go out they go places to experience media formats and not to talk. Word of mouth is probably on the upswing on the internet, but it's still lacking much sense of community that makes most people's word of mouth recognizable as having more value than your average advertising campaign. After all, there are a lot of idiots who actually WATCH those commercials.

    12. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by DongleFondle · · Score: 1
      Yeah, advertising has absolutely NO effect on me either! Those idiot marketers are just wasting their millions of dollars! AW DAMN, I just spilled Dr. Pepper on my brand new GAP jeans! SONOFA-


      *This post temporarily interrupted by BSOD*

    13. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by L7_ · · Score: 1

      /.W/.h/.a/.t/. /.a/.r/.e/./y./o./u./. /.t/.a/.l/.k/.i/.h/.g/. /.a/.b/.o/.u/.t/.?/.

    14. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's that got to do with reading?

    15. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 1

      So you don't believe in the free-market system?

      There's too much of it in magazines, I can't find the table of contents so I can read what I bought the magazine for.

      You pay, what, $3.95 for a magazine at the news stand? Subscribers pay even less per issue. Magazines would go out of business after one issue if they didn't sell advertising space. Same with TV, websites, etc etc etc.

      A local university got $10 million from a car dealership to rent their name out on their new football stadium. I will not buy a car from them ever. If it had something to do with education, fine, but all I read from the car dealers actions is that they already make way too much money.

      So the dealership gave $10 Million to the University for naming rights. I think $10M is a hefty chunk of change, even for a university. So what if the stadium if called "Big Bob's GMC/Lincoln/Mercury Stadium". You can't ignore that, considering they *gave* $10M for education and research?

    16. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. I get advertisements on my frikken credit card bills. WTF is that?!?

    17. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Take the subway instead? Sorry, the advertising in the subways (including the new digital billboards cropping up around certain subway lines) goes through them too.

      Yes, the MTA SubTalk posters in the subway _cars_ demonstrate the strength of ClearChannel. Just kidding. Once you're inside the car, you're just a little safer.

    18. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by LeninZhiv · · Score: 1

      Actually, advertising is something new! I had a friend who grew up in Soviet Armenia; after Glasnost' and all that they carried the 1990 World Cup on a feed from Europe. It was the first time they had ever seen commercials, and they were all trying to figure out what they were for.

      It is kind of silly when you think about it: "Why are they announcing on the TV that if I'm hungry I should go eat? Duh!"

    19. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel as though ads are insulting, because I can go to a store and evaluate products or ask a sales person, or read up on a product beforehand. Bah, I've gone on too long already.

      That's the whole point of this man. When you go to ask someone, look it up, etc. they all are paid off. How do you know the store doesn't have a deal with that company and all the employees are asked to hype it? How do you know where ever you reading up on it isn't owned by the parent company of the product producer or just a schill like the dr. pepper blog, there's no way to really avoid it.

      Hey out of all the evils of capitalism advertising is one of the lesser evils...be happy that's your only complaint right now...

    20. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " I don't see where advertising has any influence on my spending habits."

      thats the scary part, it does influence you spending habits.

      Why is it wrong for a business to go to a school and say "Hey, I'll pay you X to put my name on your stadium"? to me, that is what business is supposed to do, find ways to generate new revinue. My issue is with the school, they should say 'no'"

      OTOH nobody wants to pay another 100 dollars a year to keep schools open, so maybe it is worth it.

      There is qlso target issue. Hygene products are seldom focused on people over 18. notable exception is Depends(adult diaper)
      for example:
      Most people develop there deodarant buying choice when they are in there early teens.

      Takse some serious effort to change someones buying habit. Of course, if a really how (pink gender of prefrence) metions they like something to you, that may chage a buying habit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Alan · · Score: 1

      Actually the last time I bought a PC gamer type mag it was in the $7 range (canadian), one with a CD attached (not that you have a choice in the matter if you want that one) and they are $12 or so.

      I don't object so much with free markets, but I want to know when I'm getting an ad. There was a suit/complaint/bitch a few years back that people were drawn in by ads that were made to look like legit news reports. This is what I object to. If someone puts in their blog that they really like doctor pepper that's fine, but I want to know that they are saying that because they actually like it, not that they are being paid off by DP to say that.

      Same bitch with not being able to get Coke/Pepsi in college because your college/univ had a deal with Pepsi/Coke that turned Coke/Pepsi into essensially a controlled substance.

      An interesting read about a view of advertising in the future is Diamond Age by Neil Stephenson, where billboards are animated and hundreds of feet tall, sell nothing but sex and violence, and even your chopsticks have banners on them. If you get eye implants you run the risk of them being "hacked" and you haveing ads constantly running in your peripheral vision, causing some to go crazy.

      A good read (and disturbing in some ways).

    22. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a Post Office truck with a big honkin' Microsoft MSN ad on the side.

      Actually, the big box of AOL CD's at the local post office is so big it takes up a lot of the working space on the counter. Makes it a hassle to fill out the forms, etc.

      Each CD is stickered with something about 'buying stamps online' and what-not. I suppose that's the tie-in that gives AOL permission to have their junk on the counter.

    23. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      um, they're not limited to New York, nimrod. I've started seeing ClearChannel's name on billboards here in the Portland area as well, and they own five radio stations (KEX, Z100, K103, The River, and KTLK) according to their web site. They don't own any television stations in Portland yet, although they do own the NBC affiliate in Eugene. (Here in Portland the FOX and UPN affiliates merged as soon as it became legal for them to do so, but they're owned by some other national media conglomerate.)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    24. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tear it down.
      You don't have to stand for it.

    25. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, good one :D

    26. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Actually, the big box of AOL CD's at the local post office is so big it takes up a lot of the working space on the counter. Makes it a hassle to fill out the forms, etc.

      Easy solution: next time you're at the post office filling out a form, "accidentally" elbow them off the counter...

    27. Re:Advertising: Nothing new by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      They're also generally good to artists (payola, concert revenues, etc) and are willing to do anything that sells, not just promote the latest act.

      Isn't this supposed to be the other way round: i.e. artists paying payola to the radio stations, in exchange for more airtime / promotion?

  9. "a milk based product with an attitude"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it make you lactose intolerant?

    1. Re:"a milk based product with an attitude"???? by Erbo · · Score: 5, Funny
      I liked Glenn Reynolds' comment about that tag line:

      "The last time I had a milk-based product develop an 'attitude,' it was because of insufficient refrigeration."

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    2. Re:"a milk based product with an attitude"???? by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      But wait! There are more dairy products with attitude. Much more attitude, in fact.

      Milk & Cheese: Dairy Products Gone Bad!

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    3. Re:"a milk based product with an attitude"???? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I haven't seen or thought of that comic for years, thanks!

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  10. I'm all for it by Bobulusman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since I've never read a blog and and never plan to, I don't care how much advertising they put in it. Plus, maybe they would spend less on other areas and I would have to deal with less annoying flash ads.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    1. Re:I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem brother.

    2. Re:I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you're a troll and not so ignorant as to post that comment on a weblog!

    3. Re:I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction, he's an ignorant ass. Where I'm from, /. is considered a blog.

    4. Re:I'm all for it by DeathBunny · · Score: 1

      Isn't Slashdot generally considered a weblog (blog)?

    5. Re:I'm all for it by Roofus · · Score: 1
      Since I've never read a blog...


      That's impressive! How did you manage to post this without having to read Slashdot? Cause I'm sure you're aware of the fact that /. is a glorified blog itself.

    6. Re:I'm all for it by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      The editors post all the time with out reading /. ...

    7. Re:I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I noticed everyone is replying that slashdot is a blog. Yes, it's on the web, but it's not a log of someone's life. It's not a weblog. I don't know anyone who reads or writes blogs. I've looked at them a few times and they've been really lame.

      Yet, the media seems to think blogs are the biggest hit since portals! I'll be glad when the fad is over.

    8. Re:I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is considered a news site. And a terrible one at that. So I guess you can safely call Slashdot a blog to depict the amateurish aspect of it.

    9. Re:I'm all for it by L-Train8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm going to miss all the advertising inserted in between the angsty ramblings of high school students, since I'm not much into blogs myself. For kicks I looked up the blogger quoted in the article. She's here, and boy is it inane. No mention of Raging Cow yet, but she talks about her trip to Dallas.

      So let them advertise all over easy-listening radio stations, soap operas, and blogs. Just don't co-opt cool stuff...

      --

      Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
    10. Re:I'm all for it by rpi1995 · · Score: 1

      I actually read the "Product Blog" for about 2 minutes, and that was about all I could stand. Not only is the product not mentioned, the brand isn't mentioned, no descrption, nothing. Product ad campaigns that are stealthy can work if done right, ad campaignes that are undetectable are an utter failure. It's as though these guys forgot the basics of advertising.

      1)People must remember the product.
      2)People must remember the brand.

      "Did you see that ad in the superbowl for Bud Light with the two chicks?" -That's the sigh of a great ad. People mention the product when they talk about what they saw.
      "Did you see that superbowl commercial with the cats, what the hell was that?" -People will say this generates buzz, as people try to find out about it. I think people just get bored, and talk about the two hot chicks fighting over the beer.

      I think this capaign will be an utter failure. Half because of this undetectable marketing, and half because they're trying to market new milk. Milk! I mean really, it's milk, it has always come in two kinds, white and chocolate. Pina Coloda milk? Not likely.

    11. Re:I'm all for it by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      I suppose I should mention that I would not consider /. a blog. Maybe my definitions are off, but I would only call it a weblog if it was done by one person, about their lives. This is a collaborate, almost forum-like place.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    12. Re:I'm all for it by aonifer · · Score: 1

      "Did you see that ad in the superbowl for Bud Light with the two chicks?" -That's the sigh of a great ad.

      That was Miller Lite.

    13. Re:I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah-duh, chshh!

    14. Re:I'm all for it by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      I want the last five minutes of my life back.

      And whoever thought it would be "cool" to make the links white on a white background unless you mouseover them shot.

      And a coffee, black, no sugar.

  11. Ahh yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You saw it here first, as Google takes over blogging, advertisers and spammers flood all the blogs with their products and ruin another medium for all.

  12. Slashdot blog implements new astroturf method by br0ck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot has legitimized this concept by linking to Raging Cow since the site is high on Google's pagerank index. I hope Michael enjoys his new hat.

    1. Re:Slashdot blog implements new astroturf method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, actually it seems that Slashdot has been doing this since...well...since the OSDN buyout at least.

    2. Re:Slashdot blog implements new astroturf method by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Well Dr Pepper's campaign seems to have worked: after seeing this Slashdot article this morning, when I wanted something to drink I bought a can of Dr Pepper (for the first time in ages) from the vending machine. Of course the fact that the only choice was Dr Pepper or Sprite may have had something to do with it.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  13. Not a Paid post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, I have an important reaction to post here. But before I do, I think I'll go for a nice cool Dr. Pepper. MMMMM. Refreshing!

  14. Sheesh by Bob+Abooey · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they hire "Garth Brooks" as their spokesman and now they target bloggers... I think they are showing their total lack of "clue" when it comes to marketing. Why not mix the two and go after redneck bloggers who dig bad country music?

    Or maybe they should think about picking up Britney Spears now that Pepsi has dropped her for Shakira...

    --

    All the best,
    --Bob

    1. Re:Sheesh by cmallinson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think they are showing their total lack of "clue" when it comes to marketing

      If people now are talking about Dr. Pepper more than we were yesterday, then the marketing approach has already worked.

    2. Re:Sheesh by davmct · · Score: 1

      Pepsi owns Dr.Pepper. makes it hard for them to negotiate with her, when she's already quit once before...

    3. Re:Sheesh by Enzondio · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Pepsi doesn't own Dr. Pepper. They are in fact owned by Cadbury (and by Coca-Cola in the UK).

      Pepsi does bottle and distribute Dr. Pepper in the states, however.

      As this article suggests, you are not the only one with this misconception.

    4. Re:Sheesh by japhmi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Dr Pepper is owned by the Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Company, which is owned by Cadbury Schweppes. Pepsi is only one of several bottlers and distributors of Dr Pepper in the US.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    5. Re:Sheesh by snubber1 · · Score: 1

      Thats mostly true. However where I live (washington) Pepsi distributes DrPepper, and Coke has MrPibb. In Idaho where my wife grew up, Coke distributes Dr Pepper and Mr Pibb don't exist.

      --
      I don't really mind double posts on //..
    6. Re:Sheesh by Celandro · · Score: 1

      Actually, Dr. Pepper is bottled by either Coca-Cola Bottling Group or the Pepsi equivalent depending on which of the 2 gives it a better price in a specific region.

      It is bottled by CCBG in the Southern California region for example.

      Yes.. I do know too much about dr. pepper.. perhaps they would pay for me to advertise diet dr. pepper for them.. nectar of the gods!

    7. Re:Sheesh by chez69 · · Score: 1

      at least the women on his commercial are hot.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    8. Re:Sheesh by sean23007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, I'd try to pick up Britney Spears if she's available, but she got dumped by a large corporation? I mean sure, she's been dumped by a lot of people, but a company? That's low... :)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    9. Re:Sheesh by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell Dr Pepper (no period) isn't bottled at all in Boston. I can't find it in a fountain anywhere except 7-Eleven. You have to got o a mahor supermarket to find cans or bottles. In fact, people look at me like I am crazy when I ask for it. I usually end up buying it on the web at Dublin Dr Pepper and that way it comes with real cane sugar instead of that corn syrup crap. Tastes much better.

    10. Re:Sheesh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      remember , there trying to get 12 yearolds to develop the habit of buying there product. If you are 18 and drink coke, you will probably drink it as long as your drinking soda.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Sheesh by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 1
      Why not mix the two and go after redneck bloggers who dig bad country music?
      Hey! I resent that.______
      --

      ---

      WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    12. Re:Sheesh by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      "Or maybe they should think about picking up Britney Spears now that Pepsi has dropped her for Shakira..."

      From what I understand, Britney Spears left Pepsi for coke.

  15. I guess it's OK by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Funny
    After all, any self-respecting geek knows that it is NOT Jolt that gets one through those late-night coding sessions, no. It's Dr. Pepper.

    Dr. Pepper is the Official Elixir (TM) of the United Brotherhood of Freaky Coding Sprees, bless our jittery hearts.

    So I suppose that if I get some free Dr. Pepper I'll blog their warez to death. I mean, it's just par for the course.

    1. Re:I guess it's OK by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's all about Mountain Dew Code Red these days, old timer.

      I'm sure Dr Pepper goes just fine with your FORTRAN subroutines.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:I guess it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! Mountain Dew! (This astroturf paid for by 12 cases of mountain dew mysteriously appearing on my doorstep.)

    3. Re:I guess it's OK by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Mountain Dew Code Red

      Heathen. Let the flame war begin!

    4. Re:I guess it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! Gold! Mod parent up.

    5. Re:I guess it's OK by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      Bah, give me Jolt any day. Not that Dr Pepper isn't good, Jolt is just... better, IMO.

    6. Re:I guess it's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sa-weeeet! Let me try:

      Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets! Winning lottery tickets!

      (waiting impatiently, passing the time by writing this to get around the stupid compression filter... they better be here by the time I'm done typing this. OH MY GOD, YES!!!! YESSSSS!!!!!!)

    7. Re:I guess it's OK by InferiorFloater · · Score: 1

      I once heard that Mountain Dew has the closest chemical composition to urine of any soda.

      Admittedly, that's not saying much, but it makes you wonder about Code Red...

      ooh, that was bad.

      --

      ---------
      Get back to me when my brain starts working.
    8. Re:I guess it's OK by eviscerations · · Score: 1

      make 7up yours

    9. Re:I guess it's OK by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Some of these drinks I'm reading about here are only pretty new in other countries. Here in Australia for instance, Dr Pepper has only been here for about 8 years and jolt for only 3 or 4. Mr Pibb, well, I don't even know what that is. One thing I do know however, is if you want the legal equivalent to getting all hepped-up-scarface-style, is to drink Australia's finest Bundaberg Rum with ice cold Jolt Cola for that authentic "reality travelling sideways through time" feeling. Be afraid.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    10. Re:I guess it's OK by dk4 · · Score: 1

      It's all about Starbucks DoubleShots...

    11. Re:I guess it's OK by trotski · · Score: 1

      Yeah and driving around in you're SUV to go get it. Fortunatly, the unproductive Starbucks culture died with the dot coms, you're the last remaining dinosaur.

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    12. Re:I guess it's OK by Zordak · · Score: 1
      It's all about Mountain Dew Code Red these days, old timer.

      I'm sure Dr Pepper goes just fine with your FORTRAN subroutines.

      I know you're actually trolling for a Code Red/"Real" MD flame war, but allow me to redirect a little. FORTRAN will kick your measly little VC++/Java/Drag 'n' Drop Programming butt. FORTRAN had hair on its chest before little sister C++ started wondering when she would get to shave her legs. There's a reason hard-core scientific programs are written in FORTRAN. Just try to show me native support for complex numbers in your Java applet. Better yet, try to show me native support for matrices of complex numbers, including the ability to seamlessly use mathematical operators on matrices. So, you go ahead and keep thinking FORTRAN is a dinosaur, but just remember that if it is, it's a big, bad T-Rex, and you should be wary lest it decides to eat you for breakfast.

      (Note to self: Add "sleep" to To-Do list).

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  16. Raging by dledeaux · · Score: 1

    What an odd name for a product line. Any demographics done on Raging Cow? Reminds me of Mad Cow. How about Ebola Monkey? Rabid Racoon... all edible of course.

    1. Re:Raging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Venomous Cobra, the Lyme Disease Tick, the HIV-tainted Heroine Needle, and Brain-Dead, Money-Grubbing Hilary Rosen.

    2. Re:Raging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget about Ku Klux Klam

    3. Re:Raging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raging hardon.

  17. Just one more reason by efedora · · Score: 1

    Not to waste time on 'blogs'. Advertising I can avoid - what a concept! I suppose people who spend time reading blogs are people who would be influenced by 'blogvertising'.

    1. Re:Just one more reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you just posted that comment on Slashdot, a blog, right? Dumbass.

  18. Wouldnt you like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to be a pepper too?

    pajonet.com

  19. Raging Cow is great by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would they have to pay people? Raging Cow is such a wonderful product, it sells itself.

    Before I used Raging Cow, my life was miserable. Now I'm more popular than ever and my sex life has improved!

    Where do I go to apply for my free stuff?

    --

    -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    1. Re:Raging Cow is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "sex life", I assume you mean that you don't break out into sweats the same time you are in the same room with a real girl (that isn't your mom).

    2. Re:Raging Cow is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of an old SNL skit making fun of the Smuckers jam commercials:

      With a name like 'Mangled Baby Ducks', its got to be good!

    3. Re:Raging Cow is great by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Col. Klink (retired),

      Thank you for advertising our 'Raging Cow' milk-based (now less phlegm inducing than 'Code Red Cow Drink') drink. My company and I applaud your efforts of joining the 21st century of blogging. Our Vice President recently remarked, and I quote, "Col. Klink (retired) has increased our sales three-fold! Send him a 12-pack of our finest non-phlegmy milk-based drink".

      I concur, Col. Klink (retired). You can now look forwards to receiving a refreshingly cool phlegm-free drink in your mailbox (please allow 6-8 weeks for shipping).

      Tell your friends!
      CEO Dr. Pepper

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    4. Re:Raging Cow is great by PD · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that gives me a great idea. Everyone who has a web page, make a link to goatse.cx with the link text "Raging Cow" or else put the actual photo on your site with the text Raging Cow in the image tag and in some text around it.

      We'll overflow google with links to goatse.cx. Every time someone searches on Raging Cow, they'll get what their stupid ass deserves.

    5. Re:Raging Cow is great by TopShelf · · Score: 1
      Herr Colonel, could you start a blog so I can hear more? I don't want to actually try the product, I'd rather enjoy it vicariously through your narcissistic writings...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    6. Re:Raging Cow is great by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea. :-) I've done my part. :-)

    7. Re:Raging Cow is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could I paypal you some money to give me a live webcam feed of you combining raging cow with your sex life?

      ...

      DEAR GOD, STOP FUCKING THE CAN STOP FUCKING THE CAN!!!!!!!!!

  20. umm by bongobongo · · Score: 1

    i never would've thought that naming a drink "raging cow" (after a much-feared degenerative brain disorder) is the way to market a product. then again, i never would've though of bribing bloggers with t-shirts and hats :P

    sounds like a whole bunch of idiocy to me.

  21. next "big thing" in advertising... by Queelix · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What does it tell you about this 'next "big thing"' that I spent 5 minutes at this site trying to figure out what it was trying to sell and had to google 'raging cow' to figure out somewhere else that it is flavored milk. Ugh.

    Chicks wrestling in mud to sell beer. Now *that's* the 'next "big thing"'!

    Q...

    1. Re:next "big thing" in advertising... by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness I'm not the only one. I simply could not figure out what that site was supposed to be about. Isn't the point of a product site supposed to be, you know, the product?

      After Googling for it and finding some actual information, I'm horrified that anyone would be stupid enough to pay an advertising agency to come up with that logo. Look, it's Mad Cow Disease (TM) in a bottle! Now available in "Berry Mixed Up" and "Chocolate Insanity"!

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:next "big thing" in advertising... by rnelsonee · · Score: 1
      Yeah, does anyone else here think that this entire thing was planned, and we're all being duped right now? I saw the rangingcow.com link off of a site that indexes popular blogs, and after spending a couple minutes on it, I was like "WTF???". I honestly had no fucking clue what this thing was there for. So I chalked it up to me being drunk, and headed to Fark.com. Where they had a headline on how this whole thing was a lame attempt by Dr. Pepper to sell some weird-ass milk drink.

      So heading over to /. to play my usual who-broke-the-story-first game, I realize that there's more crap on how Dr. Pepper is selling this crap through an Astroturf campaign (good word, by the way), and I realized I read more stories on Dr. Pepper than Raging Cow. Hell, I mentioned Dr. Pepper twice before in this post, and I hate Dr. Pepper. Christ, that's 4 times.

      Sigh. I'm going to drink more.

  22. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has been doing this for how many years now?

  23. Can't say I like the name. by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    "Raging Cow"?

    That's sounds suspiciously familiar...

  24. Dairy based? by Threni · · Score: 1

    I think it's probably best to try and avoid dairy products where possible!

    1. Re:Dairy based? by essell · · Score: 1

      I think it's best to avoid PETA whenever possible.

      --
      i swear my userid used to be lower.
    2. Re:Dairy based? by Threni · · Score: 1

      I think it's best to think for yourself. You know, if you get some information from somewhere..anyway, have a think. You don't have to agree with everything someone says. Why do people say milk is bad for humans? Are they all deluded?

  25. Re:THIS IDEA WILL FLOP LIKE YOUR PENIS WHEN YOU SE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girls suck anyhow. Err.. I mean they don't suck. That is, they don't like to suck. Therefore they suck. Well you know.

  26. Huh? by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1

    So they flew in 6 people and their parents to talk about this extreme milk drink called Raging Cow, and all they are going to pay these people is promotional products? Like Raging Cow shirts and hats?

    Wouldn't it have been cheaper to just offer to mail out a shirt or hat or bumper sticker to anyone that posts a banner or something in their blog? And how did they determine that these 6 people are the ultimate in-crowd?

    It sounds to me like some marketing monkey just started scanning headlines to see wht was popular. "BLOGS! That's the next big thing! We'll get lots of marketing done that way!"

    Uh huh. Riiiiiiiight.

    Unless one of those 6 was Michael. After all he did post the story to /. I hope he gets a shirt out of it :)

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extreme milk!

      Wiggity wiggity!

      Is there anything that's not X-TREME these days?

  27. This is absurd. by generic-man · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find it impossible to believe that in this day and age, a large soft drink company such as Dr. Pepper thinks that they can buy their way into the hearts of good American people and get them to buy their new drink Raging Cow. Shame on you, Dr. Pepper, for inciting many good-hearted Netizens to shill for your company, Dr. Pepper, and its new drink Raging Cow.

    I would just like to say that advertising has no impact on me and that I do not associate this ongoing Dr. Pepper campaign with Raging Cow. I am a free-thinking, free-willed individual, and it would be an outrage to think that I am dumb enough to fall for Dr. Pepper's marketing. In fact, all marketing is evil, and you (Dr. Pepper) are furthering that stereotype with the marketing for your new drink, Raging Cow.

    I'm so mad, in fact, that I will instead drink dnL , another new beverage. dnL has all the great taste of 7-up, but with caffeine and a new rush of citrus flavor taste! dnL - Flip it! In fact, if you reply to this post, I'll send you a coupon good for one free dnL. dnL - Flip it!

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:This is absurd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the opinions that you present in your well-thought-out post about Dr. Pepper. In fact, with its smooth taste and natural flavorings, I wouldn't be surprised if Dr. Pepper's new drink Raging Cow sold itself!

    2. Re:This is absurd. by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for your unbiased and above all positive review of Dr. Pepper's new beverage, Raging Cow! Have you tried dnL , a refreshing citrus blast beverage from the makers of 7-up? Enclosed, please find a coupon for one free dnL . dnL - Flip it!

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:This is absurd. by ChrisNowinski · · Score: 1

      Plz snd coup AIM, LOLOLO TIA LOL

      blgrgrrl.

    4. Re:This is absurd. by 4minus0 · · Score: 1

      Add me to your list too!

      --
      You've got an easy breezy wind at your back...most of the time.
    5. Re:This is absurd. by gibbo2 · · Score: 1

      Lisa : "A subliminal idea can be planted in your mind without you even knowing it."

      Homer : "Lisa, that's a load of rich creamery butter."

  28. they're testing the advertising, not the colas by GLowder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With product names of "Chocolate Insanity" and "Pina Colada Chaos" it seems they'll bomb. Some exec at Dr Pepper probably decided to try and see what kind of impact this "new medium" might do for advertising what should be a quickly dead product. If it makes their marketing marginally better, you'll see it down the road for Dr Pepper's regular products. (Dr Pepper Exec)"Let's not just tarnish the good old Dr Pepper and Diet Dr Pepper just yet with something that might be thought of as odd from an advertising standpoint."(/Dr Pepper Exec)

    --
    I used to have a good sig...
    1. Re:they're testing the advertising, not the colas by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      But what if the crappy products they are testing it with damage the credibility of this form of advertising in the eyes of the online community? Then they have tested a new form of advertising, but they would have destroyed it in the process.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  29. this doesn't bother me a bit. by Hitch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    no one takes bloggers as an "unbiased news source" to begin with - and the people are free to advertise in any way they want, right? that means if they really do think it's crap, they're either a) going to say so or b) stop accepting it and stop writing about it. their only form of compensation is merchandise, so I'm more inclined to trust them than someone who says "oh, yeah, I LOVE Dr. Pepper! that's why they paid me $30,000 to appear in this commercial!". This blogger is saying "I LOVE Dr. Pepper! That's why I'm happily accepting crateloads of stuff to tell you about them!". IMHO, (I know, no such thing) this is actually a bit more sincere.

    --
    You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
    http://propheteer.org
    1. Re:this doesn't bother me a bit. by ianscot · · Score: 1
      IMHO, (I know, no such thing) this is actually a bit more sincere.

      See your point. In a way it's as if big advertising -- if Dr. Pepper can be considered "big" -- has actually understood the advantages of point-to-point as opposed to broadcast media. They can identify individuals who like it anyway, and sweeten the pot just a little, and that spreads some for a minimal investment in free crap. Wow, someone gets it -- at least enough to exploit it. Note to MPAA...

      But how sad is it that we're weighing the relative degrees of "sincerity" in soft-drink advertising? Maybe the word "sincere" is ripe for some sort of pop-cultural degradation, just based on our thinking this way: Dr. Pepper -- ahhh, it's sincere."

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  30. Oh crap by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    This is really going to undermine the people that blog about how much Mountain Dew they drink. Now we'll think they were being paid.
    Bah. They're not "up all night coding/playing Quake" or whatever. They really do sleep 8 hours a night.

    Damn posers.

  31. It works better that they thought... by jea6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bet there aren't really "key bloggers of influence". Bloggers out there are writing about "Raging Cow" astroturfing with no compensation thus attaining the original goal of spreading brand awareness (http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q =%22Raging+Cow%22+blog). Nobel Marketing Prize 2003.

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  32. Letterman called Dr. Pepper "Liquid Manure" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it sorta does have that twang! But, I still like it.

  33. gah by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    assuming people are willing to sell out their blog space.

    Oh please. Most of the people who run weblogs would probably sell out faster than a $5.00 PlayStation 2.

  34. Dot-Com baloney lives! by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    I can't possibly see how this could really work in Dr. Pepper's favor, but considering the cost, it sounds like an interesting gambit. Individual blogs, while growing in popularity, will never reach the critical mass of readers to drive advertising interest. A more realistic model would be to tie in with the major blogging sites, to get visibility across a wide class of blogs, rather than hook up with individuals.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  35. Who do I trust? by Visaris · · Score: 1

    I don't trust any of it. Advertising by the "hip" youth is no better than that created by the corporation. It all looks the same, has the same message, and still smells lame.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  36. Uhh... by MxTxL · · Score: 1

    So, in other words, in the near future, we're going to see the editor, Michael, walking around with a Dr. Pepper hat and toting a Dr. Pepper bookbag....

    He posted the story, he must be one of the six.

  37. I can see it now by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, I read his Blog till he sold out."

    And you though punk and indie rockers could be bad.

    --
    You say you want a revolution....
  38. indeed by hfastedge · · Score: 1

    They've done this with segway. They selected people that were highly involved with internet from a social aspect to give the first free segweys. Then the dorks did a better job than marketing ever could.

    For this level of work, I think this is much better than hiring a marketer.

    --

    -- -- --

    Help my mini cause: My journal

    1. Re:indeed by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      that's bullshit. segway has -never- given away free segways to anyone "highly involved with internet from a social aspect", i did get one, so far i like it. and i paid full price, email me and i'll show you the credit card statement or call me, i really don't care. i started a site documenting it, it's a new form of transportation-- i had no clue what or if i'd like it. you should really do research and not say stuff like that which isn't true.

      cheers,
      pt

  39. Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Whenever I post on here expressing my honest opinion in support of copyright laws, Microsoft, President Bush, the War on Terror, Christianity, and other things I believe in, I am accused by slashdot readers of being a paid shill working in someone's public relations department. This isn't the case, but it has made me interested: Is anyone actually doing this? A high modded or near-first post in a Slashdot discussion can generate an enormous number of views, so it strikes me as a great method to get a message across, especially if done in a sincere and subtle manner, and provoking heated discussion. It seems like some corporation ought to think about trying this, rather than a bunch of stupid fake blogs that no one will read anyway.

    1. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'd agree with your posts - the reason one gets modded down is mainly due to the demographic here at Slashdot. The majority of people here are early teen to mid 20's which tends to be more liberal minded or in some cases so far left because of "brainwashing" by educational institutions.

      Don't get upset, I've gotten "flamebait" before, but I often get informative, insightful - the key is to be factual NEVER opinionated about religion and conservatism!

      I'll use this post to make my comment as well: I have always thought that personalised/compensatory advertising was the way to go anyway. I think the Sprint Cellular painted VW's and other "ad cars" - which are free leases to the driver for a contractual period are a good idea.

      Anyone remember the two auctions on eBay:

      One auctioned off their child's name.

      The other; auctioned off his bald head to walk around in DesMoines Iowa with an ad on his head

      I'm surprised more of those types of things haven't happened or aren't pursued by companies.

      An event sponsor gets a lot of press by giving away T-Shirts rather than coupons

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by version5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      > so far left because of "brainwashing" by educational institutions.

      There's quite a few people who come on campus where I go to school with this attitude, I guess sent by some kind of conservative organization or talk show host or something. Anyway, if you know any of these people, groups or talk show hosts, please ask them to stop sending their people! I promise, almost none of the students are godless communists, OK, and we ignore the ones that are.

      Conservatives delight in painting a dark picture of impressionable 18-year olds, away from the ideological guidance of their homes, families and churches, fresh prey for the (Democratic) professors driven mad by godlessness, liberalism and feminism, and while radio hosts and pundits patronize us, the truth is somewhat different. Its quite true that most professors are left of center, no-one denies that, but do you think we, the students, actually care? Do we spring forth from the suburbs with our eyes and minds wide open, easily manipulated by the professors into rejecting God and country? Heck, no. Here's a reality check that you can cash at your local bank: No-one cares about the professors, or their politics. We hardly care about politics at all, unless it has to do with raising the cost of tuition. Students, on the whole, have zero interest in the opinions of their professors, or indeed, the content of the course. Students have two interests: Get the degree and get out and start making money. Learning, studying, rejecting Christianity, becoming a communist, thinking heavily about politics is not high on the agenda (but getting high is). The professors can say what they want, the only thing that matters to the students is what they say about the grades.

      In summary, please stop sending your people on campus. Its very irritating and patronizing, especially since its obvious that these people are pretty out of touch. Thank you.

      Now, I have to go to class. I think today we are drawing pentagrams and hammers-and-sickles on the floor in goat's blood, and its going to be on the final, so I can't miss it.

      --

      "It's Dot Com!"

    3. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They are also anti microsoft biased.

      I despise Microsofts bussiness practices and think they are assh*les but dam they do make some great products.

      ....ducks

      Seriously, Windows is a piece of crap but Visual Basic Enterpise edition is great that its such a time saver but anything remotly pro vb is modded down as flamebait. I do not understand why slashdotters hate it. In the bussiness world outside the age of most slashdotters the motto is time=money and integration is key. Microsoft is successfull because everything is glueable in languages like VB or ole or dcom/com++. Bussinesses do not care about hype or what looks cool but what gets the work done.

      Visual Basic is so powerfull its even used to track orders on fed-ex. The back processing is still done on mainframe but the local ordering processing engine is written in vb and it handles a quarter million hits a day!

      I find anything not pro linux = flamebait. Even if its pro solaris or other unix. Its like a cult.

    4. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " the key is to be factual NEVER opinionated about religion and conservatism!"

      or buffy. one comment on how I, personally di like the show, and man, I got modded into oblivion.

      it wouldn't be so bad, except I made different points on why I don't like in different post.

      kabluey!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of people here are early teen to mid 20's which tends to be more liberal minded or in some cases so far left because of "brainwashing" by educational institutions.

      I have it from a very reliable source (instructor) that the staff at colleges tends to be very conservative in general because they're afraid of losing the little funding that they have. Think about it: how long are you gonna keep around a teacher who instills weird ideas in their students?

      Now, the other students are another matter. Never underestimate the imaginiation of young folk who no longer have to report to their parents at the end of the day.

      I have always thought that personalised/compensatory advertising was the way to go anyway.

      In the good old days, excite used to pay employees to drive around with huge "excite!" magnets attached to their cars. They were paid extra if the magnets got stolen.

    6. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      You make a very valid point about moderator demographics. A lot of my (international) friends complain that they get modded as flamebait or offtopic because, in their words, you have to phrase your words like an American geek.

      Inevitable, I suppose. I cant understand most Cantonese jokes, even if you translate them into English. :-|

      Which brings us to an interesting hypothesis:- could it be, that blog-vertisements appeal only to those who haven't been defamiliarised from this new medium?

    7. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by adzoox · · Score: 1
      I'd believe that the staff at a FEW colleges are consevative, maybe like Liberty or Bob Jones, but you were kidding right?

      I also beleive that those schools brainwash some in the opposite direction - which is equally as bad.

      A teacher can't AFFORD to be conservative. Conservatives are not for taxation. Teachers RELY on taxation to pay salaries. In my state, the WHOLE property tax system is designed to pay for education. Republicans want to abolish it, Democrats want to increase it. Now if you are a teacher, who do you support?

      If only those that post READ for comprehension - what I said is some, not all. Some young adults think for themselves, but ALL young adults are impressionable, in some way, or another. A lot fall for political propaganda.

      In a Utopian (ethical, moral, law abiding, all encompassed sharing) world liberalism is perfect. It's not that kind of world. (Sept 11th)

      In high school, I graduated the year we went to Iraq the first time. In my economics class, the teacher was saying even then, it was over oil. It was/is a factor. At the time, we cared for the democracy that was in Kuwait. It is no different this time. (except it's democracy in Iraq) Where do young people get the ideas today that the war is over oil? I rarely see parents discussing it with their children. This time, it has so little to do with oil, that it's almost not a factor. Saddam Hussein is killing ^1000's of people, is linked to Al Queda, is supplying weapons to the Palestinians, and has massive of amounts of dangerous weapons. I thought the most damning evidence in Colin Powell's Speech to the UN was when he held a small vile up and said,"[ just this much concentrted VX if dropped in the atmosphere over Manhattan could kill 10,000 or more people in less than 30 minutes!]"

      I'm not saying teachers are for dictators or that they are bad people. Politics is often an all or nothing proposition. If an impressionable person believes one agenda, they are likely to see merit in the whole thing. Anyone who is saying they are balanced and on center is a coward. Everyone has issues that the other party doesn't like, but there are core issues like taxes, social programs, budgets, etc that you are either for or against, Dem or Rep.

      As for the comment about Clinton's behavior, I wasn't even talking about his sexual behavior. Anyone remember what he did when the USS Cole got bombed by OSAMA BIN LADEN? Nothing. Anyone remember how he signed the largest tax bill in history into law? Anyone remember that he appointed circuit judges that are trying (as we speak) to get the "Star Spangled Banner, Prayer in Schools, and even our OWN Constitution and Pledge Of Allegiance REWORDED or ELIMINATED!

      I'm not mad at the left, I'm not targetting teachers. The average teacher is democratic or liberal, as is the mass media. Someone mentioned Fox News. I actually think Bill O'Reilly is one the few balanced people I have ever seen. Rush Limbaugh is too extreme. But, neither are EVER in between.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    8. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      I thought the most damning evidence in Colin Powell's Speech to the UN was when he held a small vile up and said,"[ just this much concentrted VX if dropped in the atmosphere over Manhattan could kill 10,000 or more people in less than 30 minutes!]"

      Excuse me... How is this evidence? It is a statement of fact about a chemical, but it has nothing to do with weather or not Iraq has any of it. It is simple a FUD (Fear Uncertainty Doubt) tactic. Powell (who I had a lot of respect for until then) was trying to use your fear of the terrible things that would happen to convince you Saddam is dangerous, without saying a thing about Saddam, he said things about Saddam elsewhere in his speech, but he did not provide satisfactory evidence that Saddam has VX.

      And about the whole pledge thing. Is 'under god' really so important to the meaning of the pledge. It was fine before they added it in the 50's...

      "One nation with liberty and justice for all" Sounds pretty adequate to me.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    9. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by adzoox · · Score: 1
      It IS evidence ... he had 200 THOUSAND tons of VX and has not been able to provide a detailed description of it's destruction or solution.

      I agree it was a scare tactic, but it fit with all the other evidence such as the long range missle testing silo that was active even in October of last year, his housing key Al Queda operatives in his Bagdad Palace. I see no purpose in your defending a person or even speaking against his removal.

      Yes, there is something wrong with removing the words. RESPECT. You don't have to pledge, you don't have to attend an event where they pledge, you don't have to participate. You can sing "la la la" in your head while they say it. I HAVE respect for you to do that, have respect for me (and the majority) to do so!

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    10. Re:Astroturfing through slashdot posts? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I had to say the pledge until high school...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  40. seems pretty effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after all, slashdot is advertising Dr Pepper (r) Raging Cow (tm) for free.

  41. Fatties unite! by L.+VeGas · · Score: 1

    In a related story, Star Jones is suing Raging Cow manufacturer, Dr. Pepper, for trademark infringement.

  42. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. loves Raging Cow

  43. "Hi.." by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    "Hi, like.. my name is Ashley and I'm.. like.. a corporate BlogWhore.."

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  44. got milk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll need it for strong bones for troll tuesday

  45. Idol Worship? by da3dAlus · · Score: 1

    So they plan on getting people to talk up a new product by plugging it on their blog. Then I suppose the idea is to make this new product into a cult phenomenon. Will that make the Raging Cow the next golden calf?
    Hmm...making me hungry now. Anyone want to go get a Mooby burger?

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  46. This is new? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
    New my arse. This has been going on for a long time, Apple has being pulling exactly the same stunt for years, getting people who are widely read (Douglas Adams, Stephen Fry, Carrot Top, etc) to write constantly and incessantly about how great Apple Macs are.

    Exactly the same. Except without the free merchandise.

    Oh, wait...

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  47. advertise however you want by buttahead · · Score: 1

    howard stern has been doing this for years. he follows their script just as far as he needs to in order to let the public know what the pruduct is. After that he'll start making stuff up, like how much Thor's vodka he drank last night. He justs starts making up details, usually fitting them into whatever bit he is in at the time.

    1. Re:advertise however you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Howard Stern is the pillar of morality...

    2. Re:advertise however you want by buttahead · · Score: 1

      the point is to sell the product. morality often gets the back seat to profits. commercials aren't trying to raise kiddos, they are raising thier bottom line.

  48. Well at least SOMEBODY is trying new things by Bvardi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least it is nice to see some advertisers not going the route of picking traditional media and then using legislation to force that media upon people despite changing technology (Can anyone here remember a certain quote about using PVR's to skip ads being "stealing"?) Personally it's nice to see different models of advertising being explored... maybe with some luck we'll see a less invasive model that is more effective for advertisers and less annoying for everyday consumers. (Mind you I realize the likelyhood of that is about the same as Microsoft going the non profit corporation route..) Still, at least product endorsement/placement in blogging is preferable to having them install an LCD on the inside of my eyeballs and forcing ads into my subconscious. After all my subconscious is scary enough as it currently stands.

  49. Obligatory Simpsons by joediga · · Score: 0

    Blech!!! I'll have the crab juice.

    --
    -- ignoring AC's since... well, always --
    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regular mountain dew, while I like the taste, makes me sick to my stomach if I drink too much too fast (like a can in 5 minutes)

      I can chug code red faster than I can piss it out. It truly is the drink of gods.

  50. Beware of what? by nanojath · · Score: 4, Insightful
    bloggers beware


    Beware of what? Guess what kids - your culture is being appropriated by the marketeers! (pause for gasps of astonishment and chagrin).


    Is there even a line between culture and commerce anymore? In any event, the raging cow site drips with manufactured "kewl" - if you're influenced by this kind of pap you deserve to be sold carbonated milk, or whatever the hell it is.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    1. Re:Beware of what? by nanojath · · Score: 0, Troll
      great, I'm insightful AND funny. Now would you go look at the comment I actually care about - about how Apple's alleged new music service is a bunch of BS?

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    2. Re:Beware of what? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know what's funnier, the idea of blogging as some kind of culturally significant activity or the raging indignity of "legitimate" bloggers over people placing commercial content in their blogs.

    3. Re:Beware of what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, what's the problem? You're obviously only going to apply for merchandise compensated advertising if you like the product, and in that case you're not lying if you mention it positively in your blog. Unless the blog becomes a string of product placements, what's wrong with letting people know about the part of you that is a consumer?

    4. Re:Beware of what? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      please replace blog with literacy, oh an go back to just befor the dark age ended.

      How many 'educated' people then would have said that the average person could read or write? they would probably say "why?"
      blogs will probably fall away, but they might not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Beware of what? by swb · · Score: 1

      How can you even compare the transformation from an illiterate to a literate society with the ability to ramble in writing for strangers?

      By trying to compare literacy with blogging, you're highlighting the gross over-significance that many place on blogging as some kind of culturally significant activity.

      It's not. Sorry. Get over it. It's a poorly edited real-time autobiography in the hands of the best writers, and idiotic mental masturbation in the hands of most everyone else.

  51. Hmm. by superdan2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like I should contact Apple, Nissan, and Seven about improving my lifestyle. I already sing the praises of my iBook and XTerra...and a custom built Axiom Titanium would round out my stable quite nicely.

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Hmm. by dougnaka · · Score: 1

      FYI Nissan.com is _not_ for nissan motors, makers of the Xterra... You want nissanusa.com
      Nissan.com is quite a funny story, however... Uzi Nissan, an Israeli I think, registered the domain well before Nissan Motors, and they sued him and lost, but in the battle he lost the ability to use the domain for any commercial purpose. Now it's a chilling reminder of who controls your mind... get your afdb ASAP (not at afdb.org)

      --
      My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  52. Payola by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Definition of payola: The paying of cash or gifts in exchange for airplay. [...] the anti-payola statute was passed under which payola became a misdemeanor, penalty by up to $10,000 in fines and one year in prison.

    Seems like the same thing to me, except we're talking about blog space instead of airplay. If I was a blogger who had this proposal come to me, I'd report them to the FBI. Or am I totally off base here?

    1. Re:Payola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the law doesn't stop payola, they now use third party brokers between the payer and the player. IANAL.

    2. Re:Payola by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Seems like the same thing to me, except we're talking about blog space instead of airplay. If I was a blogger who had this proposal come to me, I'd report them to the FBI. Or am I totally off base here?"

      You're totally off base here. The problem with payola is that the radio stations have a government granted monopoly allowing them license to utilize a finite public good. In a given area, there's a relatively small limit on the number of stations that can broadcast at a given time. Because of this, a pay-for-airplay system unfairly excludes a number of songs from the market and restricts the ability of the airwaves to be used to best benefit the citizenry to which they ultimately belong.

      Furthermore, radio stations are still allowed to accept compensation for traditional advertisements. It's understood that even though the stations are utilizing a public good, such activity still requires funding. As such, it's permitted that the run paid advertisements during their programming. However, it's just not permitted for them to subvert the "serving the public" obligation (i.e. playing music) with that programming being driven by money.

      Finally, blogs aren't a closed market. Any idiot can throw up a webserver and jump into the fray. There are two privileges that the "popular" blogger enjoys: 1) More bandwidth (as they've presumably invested in better hosting as part of their growth) and 2) More eyeballs. Neither one of these is out of reach a new entry into the market. While some sites (such as Slashdot) enjoy part of their success from being the first on the field, there's no intrinsic factors in the medium that prevent newcomers from one day achieving comparable success.

      So overall, it's just plain old product placement. Purists may be upset with it (and may question the artistic integrity of the blogger over it), but there's no wrongdoing here barring future potential misconduct on the part of a blogger (such as lying about the product or utilizing a blog server that prohibits commercial content).

    3. Re:Payola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an ass, Erasmus.

    4. Re:Payola by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      So overall, it's just plain old product placement. Purists may be upset with it (and may question the artistic integrity of the blogger over it), but there's no wrongdoing here barring future potential misconduct on the part of a blogger (such as lying about the product or utilizing a blog server that prohibits commercial content).

      Okay, that makes sense then. It just had a bad taste to it (no pun intended.)

      If I had mod points, I'd mod up your reply to me. But since I posted, mod points are gone.

      Thanks!

  53. Happy to... by antispamist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think just about every blogger out there would sell out if they were given the chance, atleast once. I know I would :)

    I'm sure it won't be long before this form of advertising quickly soils what is reasonably pure right now (at least it looks pure compared to what it will in a year!).

    --
    --Thei Antispamist A useless endevor that will cer
  54. I'm a blogger, you're a a blogger by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    he's a a blogger, she's a a blogger, would you like to be a blogger too?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:I'm a blogger, you're a a blogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      understand that you must be beaten for that.. nothing personal, we'll even put on some Manilow for background music.

    2. Re:I'm a blogger, you're a a blogger by Tower · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to find the story filter on the preferences page that lets me eliminate any story that has the word "blog" in the title or text.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  55. So basically they hoodwinked some blog kiddies by Monofilament · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. who don't know any better that you should get paid for advertising products that make money for other people. I mean why should you advertise for free for some corporation. I don't think the bloggies in question.. really have an idea of how much cheaper they're making things for Dr. Pepper. And in return they get what.. t-shirts.. hats merchanidise... Ha they're still advertising Dr.Pepper for free even with the damn compensation they get. Screw that! Thats why i hate most main line clothing products cause they plaster their name on the clothing. I mean what the hell I pay 80 bucks for a shirt.. that has the name of the company plastered all over it.. so i'm a walking advert for them.

    Personally I have a blog.. blogs aren't my beef.. and yes I do advertise on my blog... for Blogger.. why? because its a free service.. i pay nothing to upkeep my blog, so thats good compensation. These people still have to upkeep their sites.. no compensation.

    Oh well its gonna fail miserably anyway so who cares..

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
    1. Re:So basically they hoodwinked some blog kiddies by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We got a set of 'Coca-Cola' branded mixing bowls as a wedding present. I am in the process of slowly grinding the glazed-on Coca-Cola logo off the bowls. A few rubs with the flat face of the sharpening stone every time they get washed. Subtle, and it's necessary to be subtle, as my wife is influenced by the 'southern culture' or whatever that absolutely reveres Coca-Cola.

      If and when she notices the slowly fading Coke logos on our mixing bowls, I'm going to tell her Coke has been late with payments for the adspace.

  56. So long as the blogger is honest by lavalyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't have a problem with it. If the blogger states on their site that they are receiving promotional goods from Dr. Pepper, then this form of advertising is about equivalent to banner ads with the little word "advertisement" underneath. Annoying but fair.

    Somehow I don't think the bloggers will do that, so ignore what I just said.

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    1. Re:So long as the blogger is honest by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I took a quick look on the blogs linked to hte Raging Cow page and none of them mention it, and a few of them included links or photos to the Raging Cow page, and referenced it like it was just another blogger.

      Pretty sad.

      Of course, it is pretty stupid of Dr. Pepper to have paid the money to fly them out if all they are doign is putting a link in their blog.

  57. I'm a pepper... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...he's a pepper... wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?

    1. Re:I'm a pepper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sad thing is, probably over half the people here don't remember that. Dang.

      For the record, I'm a pepper too!

    2. Re:I'm a pepper... by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sad thing is, probably over half the people here don't remember that

      I remember! David Naughton was my hero when I was 7!

    3. Re:I'm a pepper... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Dr. Pepper recently try to advertise on Fark? I seem to recall that was the joke du jour for about a week. Whatever happened with that?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:I'm a pepper... by Bizaff · · Score: 1

      But if you say it, you have to say it like Ben Jabituya from Short Circuit:

      "Voodn't choo like dto be a pepper dtoo."

      It just loses something. *sigh*

  58. This is terrible! by mugnyte · · Score: 1

    This message brought to you by Coke.

  59. drink ads by Lxy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I dunno, you can advertise a drink in any way you want to, but good advertising does not a good beverage make. Maybe it works for some people, but an advertisement makes me buy a drink once. From there on, the only way I'd buy it again is if it lived up to the hype.

    Friends tell me how much I need to try Red Bull. I finally buy a can. Tastes like shit. No amount of persuasion from friends or TV will ever convince me to try it again.

    Code Red. Why Pepsi is messing with Moutain Dew is beyond me. I try a bottle. Tastes like shit. I'll never buy Code Red again.

    Vanilla Coke. I hear it advertised on the radio. I'm passing a convenience store, buy a bottle. Tastes like Coke and vanilla, but seperate. No blending of flavors. I'll never buy that again.

    So, now there's some new drink from Dr. Pepper. I'll probably hear about it on the radio, or maybe see a blog. I'll buy a bottle some day. If I like it, I buy more. If I don't, I won't buy it ever again.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:drink ads by TheSync · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe this is OT, but Diet Vanilla Coke is much more palatable to me than plain old Diet Coke. For us zero-cal drinkers...

    2. Re:drink ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vanilla Coke tastes a lot like Jack and Coke to me.

    3. Re:drink ads by robi2106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But that is what advertising is for. Mission accomplished. You recognize the new product name and even consider buying it. Eventually you do. Granted, advertising would want you to buy it because it seems great, and because everyone else uses / consumes / does it.

      With how many people reached by ads, the tiny fraction that act on the ad make the ad profitable.

    4. Re:drink ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be drinking spiced rum (capt morgan?) and coke if you're tasting vanilla in your spiked coke.

      Unless Jack and coke is short for Jack-off and coke. That's just gross, no matter which team you bat for

      AC

    5. Re:drink ads by cgreuter · · Score: 4, Funny
      Code Red.

      I'd never heard of Code Red until that IIS worm. Maybe that's what Raging Cow needs too.

      After all, aren't they trying to do viral marketing here?

    6. Re:drink ads by Otter · · Score: 1
      Maybe it works for some people, but an advertisement makes me buy a drink once. From there on, the only way I'd buy it again is if it lived up to the hype.

      Well, yeah. That's the purpose of this exercise -- to build name recognition above that of the other 10,000 weird sodas being introduced this year.

      Code Red. Why Pepsi is messing with Moutain Dew is beyond me.

      FYI: Mountain Dew has an excellent market share among white teenagers and young adults. It does poorly among blacks and Hispanics of the same age. Code Red is designed to carry the Mountain Dew image and branding to a sector that prefers sweeter drinks.

    7. Re:drink ads by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, now there's some new drink from Dr. Pepper. I'll probably hear about it on the radio, or maybe see a blog. I'll buy a bottle some day. If I like it, I buy more. If I don't, I won't buy it ever again.

      That's what advertising is supposed to do.

      You heard about the product; you tried buying the product.

      If 10% of the people in the States buy only one bottle, that's still more than 25 million units sold. Small potatoes, yes--but if they get 10% of those to like the stuff, then that's nearly three million hooked customers. Ka-ching!

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:drink ads by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Say what? Mountain Dew regular isn't sweet enough for some people?

      Heck, I like Code Red, but is it really that much sweeter than the regular nectar of the gods??

    9. Re:drink ads by beanball75 · · Score: 1

      If taste was the only reason people bought soft drinks then Coca Cola would be no more popular that Sam's Choice.

    10. Re:drink ads by Lxy · · Score: 1

      Not really. Where can I buy Sam's choice other than Walmart or Sam's club?

      Every convenience store has Coke. Every soda machine has either Coke or Pepsi. It's easy to get. Sure, it costs more, but it's easy to get. I'll drink Sam's choice over Coke, if I'm near a machine/store that has it. Usually when I need my caffeine fix I'm nowhere near a Sam's or Wlamart, I have to buy what's offered to me or wait til I get home.

      If Sam's were equally distributed, I think you'd see that in fact Coke, Pepsi, and Sam's Choice Cola would be a lot closer in numbers.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    11. Re:drink ads by mph · · Score: 3, Funny
      Code Red is designed to carry the Mountain Dew image and branding to a sector that prefers sweeter drinks.
      Sweeter than Mountain Dew?! I thought only the All-Syrup Super Squishee was the only thing that fit that description.
    12. Re:drink ads by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Edit to above:

      Great example is SPAM. The cost of the advertisement is much smaller (2-4 orders or magnitude) but the principle is identical.

      It is fundamentally how the advertising business works. And in a larger sense it is how capatalism works.

      robi

    13. Re:drink ads by micromoog · · Score: 1
      Vanilla Coke . . . tastes like Coke and vanilla, but seperate. No blending of flavors.

      What the hell does that even mean? "I taste Coke, and I taste vanilla. But where's the vaCokanilla?!"

      Please. If you don't like it say so, but this "my palate is too refined for Vanilla Coke" crap is just lame.

    14. Re:drink ads by skwang · · Score: 1

      You are the exception to the rule.

      Soft Drink companies discovered years ago that it is not the taste that sells cola, but the image that sells. This change is mostly attributed to New Coke which bombed, but caused a rush to buy "classic" coke. (Aside: conspiracy theorists say Coke purposely did this to boost sales, snopes.com has the story otherwise.)

      This is why Pepsi got Brintey Spears to sell their soft drink, because the target audience of her musi^H^H^H^Himage is Pepsi's main demographic, and hence they want to build their image that Brittney Spears drinks Pepsi and so should you. Blind taste tests show that people can't tell the difference between Coke and it's competitors anyway. Actually, people prefer Pepsi's sweeter taste over Coke's, which is why Pepsi has/had their "blind taste test" advertising. Of course once you start drinking a product you then say you drink it because of the taste. After all, you have become acclimated to it. I gave up drinking most sodas a while back, and now they all taste too syrupy sweet to me. Even Coke which I swore by years ago, I can say I don't really like anymore.

    15. Re:drink ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried the evil that is vanilla coke? While you are drinking it, it tastes like regular old coke. But the -instant- you stop drinking it, you are hit with the most powerful pure-fake-vanilla after-taste ever unleashed on the public.

      They tricked people into trying this crap by making it the top 2 buttons of coke machines in many amusement parks. You wanted a coke, but ended up with a vanilla coke. The buttons were almost identical, so you had to look closely to realize how the hell this evil could have possible been dispensed when all you wanted was a coke. There were a LOT of partially-empty vanilla coke bottles in the trash cans last summer...

    16. Re:drink ads by flink · · Score: 1

      Vanilla Coke is nothing new. Soda fountains used to offer it. If you want a real vanilla coke (one that doesn't taste like crap), just add about a teaspoon of quality vanilla extract to a tall glass of regular Coke. Although I don't drink colas much anymore, it used to be one of my favorite drinks when I was little.

    17. Re:drink ads by fermion · · Score: 1

      Compare drink ads to ads for drugs, i.e. cigarette, prescription, etc. Even more than clothes , these ads sell lifestyle improvement. This is especially true for red bull and mountain dew, both which are crap.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:drink ads by Puu · · Score: 1

      At least the Mad Cow viral campaign in the UK was a nationwide success.

      (-1 Redundant but I couldn't resist.)

    19. Re:drink ads by radish · · Score: 1

      If this is the same Code Red as has been sold in Europe for the last few years, it's little more than a nasty Red Bull rip off. Along with Red Square, Battery, Volt and all the others.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    20. Re:drink ads by YottaMatt · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point entirely. You've listed off a number of highly marketed drinks and told us you didn't like them. So what? Is Coke that much better a cola then 20 or so generic-brand colas? Not really, its got a lot on some of them, but there's a couple fo the generics that I believe are much better than that Coca~cola crap, its quite sad that all most people even consider is Coke, Vanilla Coke and Pepsi.

  60. feh, this is nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing! I've been a, ehm, marketing representative for Microsoft here at Slashdot for the past 4 years!

  61. Will shill for real cane sugar goodness! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I prefer Dr. Rush!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  62. blogs are the most influential google bombers by n3k5 · · Score: 1

    Now that Google buyed Pyra, it's obvious which new criteria will be added to PageRank. Dr. Pepper are just trying to get a head start in exploiting them ;-)

    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  63. Raging Cow == Mad Cow? by ahrenritter · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to drink something whose first association in my mind is mad cow disease?

    --

    All I wanted was a rock to wind a piece of string around, and I ended up with the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota
  64. WARNING! by Grahhh · · Score: 2, Funny

    WARNING:
    Do not let Dr Pepper touch your genitals; he is not a real doctor!

  65. hah, nice by zephc · · Score: 1

    "dnL and the Flip It logo are registered trademarks of Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. © 2002 Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc."

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  66. This reminds me of another product that died by dacarr · · Score: 1
    There used to be something called "Killer Shake" here in CA. It even gave fun instructions: "Shake till you can shake no more, then SCARF IT DOWN!" It was more or less billed to the hip quasi-surfer community.

    Oh, I forgot to mention just what the stuff was, just like the raging cow site did. It was an ultra-pasteurized flavored milk product. Came in flavors like "gnarly" chocolate (or something crazy like that), and similar naming schemes with their pina-colada and strawberry flavor.

    I kind of liked it, they actually didn't taste too bad. But, it died. (They were 150% of the price of a pint of Nestle's Quik.) Why? No (reasonable) advertising. Maybe it was the lack of blogs back in the late 80s to the early 90s when the stuff existed.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  67. Squash criticism, co-opt opinions = profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't it seem ironic that the same corporations who go after anyone who uses the Internet to criticize them now want to coopt the Internet to praise them in exchange for goods and services?

    Here is the fact plain and simple: profit motive and ethics are mutually exclusive. Truth and advertising are mutually exclusive. Civilization and capitalism are mutually exclusive.

    It's time to find another way to live.

  68. Or more accurately by stand · · Score: 1
    Bloggers beware!

    Or more accurately, blog readers beware.

    --
    Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    1. Re:Or more accurately by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      People read blogs? I thought they were just there on the off chance there would be nudity in the webcam shots.

      Hell, even the raging cow site makes that observation with it's webcam.

  69. I figured out how they chose the 6 bloggers! by GreyyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you look at the blogs linked on the Raging Cow page, you will see they all have one thing in common.

    Each one has some of the most horrible web design I've ever seen! Getting rid of any sort of indicator for URLs. Lots and lots of frames. Colors that make my eyes bleed. It's like they all read every book on what not to do and did it.

    The marketing people must have thought that the pages are so bad they loop around the scale and become super-impressive and a hip.

    1. Re:I figured out how they chose the 6 bloggers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Agree.... I looked at the Raging Cow crap linked above and I couldn't tell what was being pushed other than some loser bitching about his life... like there aren't a million journals out there like that already.

      I had to go to Google to find out what this raging cow stuff actually is. All the flavors sound horrible for being milk based.

    2. Re:I figured out how they chose the 6 bloggers! by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      The marketing people must have thought that the pages are so bad they loop around the scale and become super-impressive and a hip.
      You're half-right, in that I've coded better pages by banging my hip into the keyboard. :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:I figured out how they chose the 6 bloggers! by polyiguana · · Score: 1

      Considering that these are allegedly "key influence" bloggers, I have serious doubts for the future of society.

    4. Re:I figured out how they chose the 6 bloggers! by PD · · Score: 1

      I just finished a good rant about the damn site on my web page. Go read it. Copy it if you want, put it all over. Let's get the anti-raging cow thing going.

    5. Re:I figured out how they chose the 6 bloggers! by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on giving Dr Pepper the free advertising. That is what makes Rush L. so popular. Many people listen in just so they can rant about him that afternoon. That is where pularity / notoriety comes from. Same thing with Howard Stern, many daytime talk shows, or any other shock media personality or program.

      robi

  70. Blogs- only fags and fat chicks blog... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blogs- only fags and fat chicks blog...

    Doesnt the Doctor know that?

  71. New Slogan by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    "Do the moo"

    Had to make a cow joke one way or the udder.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  72. Any News is Good News by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    Dr. Pepper et al could care less what the blogging public thinks about their practices of giving away their product to selected popular individuals. They just want free news. You usually can't pay a legit news service to spread the word about your product unless they want to cover it.

    Bloggers may be more influenced by free stuff (aka disguised bribes) since they do what they want to do. If getting free stuff is cool, then they will get free stuff, talk about it for awhile, then drop it when the next new thing rolls along.

    Remember the Simpsons, crowds are fickle.

    robi

  73. pattern recognition by heh2k · · Score: 1

    *spoiler*

    this is a lot like what's in gibson's new book. a company pays people (reimburses, actually) to go out to bars and say they like a product when it's mentioned.

  74. Blogging Synergy by poena.dare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Corporate America has found a new advertising medium in blogging. However, to cut costs they have turned their prison-run call centers into "blog farms." While the results were extremely entertaining, they ended up sending the wrong message.

    ---

    Slash, Rapist: Nothing in life is better than roughly grabbing the firm, artificial nodules of a semiconscious drunken whore and yelling exuberantly, "Ollie, Ollie, Oxen Free" at the top of my lungs to passing fear-filled elderly couples. Afterwards I had a Raging Cow with a shot of tequila in it...

    Jim Tumor, Paranoid Schizophrenic: At the party we all had Raging Cows and celebrated by taking a slightly soggy slice of very moldy wheat bread and meticulously fashioning a quaint decorative party hat out of it for our dearest companion and pet lama, Cuthbert...

    Lonnie Tingle, Murderer: Man, those Raging Cow drinks are great! I wish my life could have been as good as one of them. I guess it all went wrong when I repeatedly stabbed my parents with a dull kitchen knife because the circumcision I had when I was 8 days old went horribly awry...

    Dave Candyman, Burglar: Often while enjoying the quaint bouquet of a Raging Cow, I would follow rich looking strangers at the local mall parking lot until they noticed. To explain myself I would innocently explain that I was looking for my baby brother, and at the same time, memorize their licence plate number...

    Delbert Flapdoodle, Habitual Drunk: Gosh darn! Life can sure be funny sometimes. I always thought Raging Cow was an insult. It wasn't until the time my Jug and Washboard band was mistakenly booked to perform in a seedy dive in Harlem that I learned the truth...

    Mac Soul, Stalker: As we relaxed on the couch, we shared a Raging Cow. I needed her to understand me. I would never hurt her in a million years! So I kept slowly massaging her delicate legs in a way that said, "Don't worry, I know we are just friends - but - if you ever want to take it further then it's fine with me." I kept waiting for her to say yes. Desperately waiting. Desperate...

    Magzo Berman, Sociopath; I am taping the empty bottle of Raging Cow on my keyboard. Tap. Tap. Tap. Just 'cause I like the sound of the tapping, ever tapping, like the tapping on my chamber door. Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!" Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha and ha!

  75. Switch! by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to be a Mountain Dew junkie. I just couldn't last through an all night coding session without the stuff. Then I switched to Barqs Farmous Red Creme Soda. It's the elixer of life. It's smooth creamy flavor is wonderful. The best part is it's caffeine free. This means after a long night of pumping myself full of it's sugary sweetness while sitting in front of my CRTs I don't have to worry about having trouble falling asleep or waking up with a raging headache due to lack of caffeine.

    Barqs Famous Red Creme Soda, I switched! Why haven't you?

    1. Re:Switch! by dcuny · · Score: 3, Informative
      How many free cases is that post worth?

      I hate to mention this (because it makes this post Grammar Police posting instead of merely -1 Still Not Funny), but here goes:

      The Rule About It's and Its

      • It's is only used as a replacement for "it is".
      • The posessive is "its".

      Unfortunately, application of this rule guarantees that your sentences look wrong.

      Oh, yes: for creamy sugary smoothness, I rely on A&W Cream Soda. But who wants to drink what the Grammar Police drink?

    2. Re:Switch! by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      I know the rule of it's and its. I simply didn't catch it when I hit preview, and Slashdot doesn't let you edit your posts.

    3. Re:Switch! by 68K · · Score: 1

      "It's" is not just short for "it is," it's (jhar har) also short for "it has."

    4. Re:Switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caffeine free!? If I didn't want caffeine, I'd just mix together some orange juice and corn syrup. There's your elixer of life. Enjoy it in all its vomit-inducing glory.

    5. Re:Switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, now all you have to do is educate people on your/you're and that "would of/could of/should of" rather than would've/could've/should've crap.

  76. 9R4MM3R N4Z| 53Z: "YU0 == T3H L005E!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    correction : You're an ass.

    You're welcome!

  77. I don't know which is worse. by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know which is worse, the number of "Sign me up, dude!" posts, or the cheap price you all have for selling your soul to corporate America. It's like those Tufts students who let spammers use their email accounts for $20.00 a month.

    What amazes me about America is NOT that we seem to be a nation of whores, but that we are a nation of cheap whores.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:I don't know which is worse. by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Apropos:

      Ugarte: Rick, think of all the poor devils who can't meet Renault's price. I get it for them for half. Is that so... parasitic?
      Rick Blaine: I don't mind a parasite. I object to a cut-rate one.

      -- Casablanca

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:I don't know which is worse. by pherris · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the old joke:

      A man and woman just meet and are talking.
      Man: "Will you sleep with me?"
      Woman: "No way."
      Man: "How about for a million dollars?"
      The woman thinks about it.
      Woman: "Ok."
      Man: "How about for $20?"
      Woman: "$20? What do you think I am?"
      Man: "I know what you are. Now we're just haggling over the price."

      Being a whore is bad enough, but being a cheap whore is worse. Tell Dr. Pepper to shove it. RatBastard has got it right.

      --
      "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  78. You are totally off base here by junkpunch · · Score: 1

    It's more like companies like Coke paying TV and movie execs for product placement in their shows/films.

  79. 'nohter link by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
    Over at http://www.cool-2b-real.com/, you might try "2" guess who they really "b."

    (Hint: check out that 3/4 pound burger!)

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  80. Deliciously ironic by redtail1 · · Score: 1

    In return, they get to "advertise however they want" through their blog.

    However they want? Some people will be paid to slam Dr. Pepper and crack daily jokes about how the new soft drink tastes like panther piss. I suppose that's one way to subsidize the blogging community but probably not what Dr. Pepper intended...

  81. What's really amazing... by foo+fighter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    isn't that people are marketing this stuff in their blog. It is Dr. Pepper providing gear for their efforts.

    Most people walk around happy to sport logos everywhere: their t-shirts, shoes, cars, computers (or computer components). They actually pay for the privilege. Why anyone would be surprised or upset about the tables being turned, I don't understand.

    Product placement in our entertainment is everywhere and will become even more prevelent as traditional marketing becomes less effective. I view blogs as primarily entertainment and was frankly expecting this.

    BTW, anyone see the Ford Focus car chase in Alias? I had to turn it off when they zoomed in for a lingering shot on the Focus' logo. Blech.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:What's really amazing... by ansible · · Score: 1

      Most people walk around happy to sport logos everywhere: their t-shirts, shoes, cars, computers (or computer components). They actually pay for the privilege.

      I still don't understand this myself. It is not as if the logo-adorned products are cheap either. They're usually more expensive. Maybe I'm just a socially-innept geek, but I still can't figure the appeal of having 'Tommy Hilfinger' blazoned across my back.

      I've got a few logo t-shirts. Most of them I got for free. The only ones I paid for are Tux the penguin, the Debian swirl, and OpenBSD. Oh yeah, and a Akira t-shirt.

      Heck, I usually cut the leather "placard" off the back of my jeans. The 'Intel Inside' swirl is the first thing to go on a new PC (well, one that doesn't have an Althon in it).

      At least the yahoo bloggers are moving in the right direction, getting paid to advertise.

  82. So what does Michael get out of it? by FreeLinux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is Michael getting a free copy of MS Visual Studio.Net or is it a copy of Windows 2003?

    Don't tell us, that you fell for the larger penis that they promised.....

  83. If i had mod points... by xtermz · · Score: 1

    ...i would so mod you down...

    How are the two even related? Does the FCC regulate blogs? Are blogs public services that are required to have licenses to operate?.

    No..it's some pimply faced kid with a web site. How is this anything as bad or close to "payola"

    Call the FBI, they'll probably laugh at you...

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
  84. If only Tadpole would do this... by kwoo · · Score: 1

    I would happily rant on about how great their laptops are. Currently, I only use them as an example of how you can make money in a computing niche market. :)

  85. errrr.... NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If people now are buying Dr. Pepper more than we were yesterday, then the marketing approach has already worked.

    Jesus H. Christ and his black bastard Bart!

    They don't care if you pour it down the drain, as long as they get your $$$.

    Nobody (other that selfimportant advertising morons) cares about branding if no one's buying the product.

  86. Let me get this straight by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

    Promo merchandise = more advertising.

    So they "pay" you to advertise for them with products that advertise for them.

    Personally, if I'm going to sell my soul I'm going to do it for cash.

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  87. Boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who has the time to read about other people's shitty lives? I can barely find time to read Slashdot. Also, if I remember correctly , Dr Pepper sucks ass.

  88. Excuse me by WetCat · · Score: 1

    what does the word "astroturf" mean?
    What is the origin of that word?
    It's not in Webster dictionary.

    1. Re:Excuse me by aderusha · · Score: 1

      astroturf=fake grass

      in this sense, it's somebody trying to stir up product awareness by creating a bogus "grassroots" movement of some sort.

  89. Been done for a while... by jhealy1024 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading a long time ago about companies in Japan that would do this in the real world (as opposed as to in blogs).

    They would give teenagers (usually girls) all sorts of fun toys (cell phones, PDAs, and other gadgets) and some spending money. The teenagers would go to the mall to spend their money, all the while playing with the stuff the companies gave them. Naturally, other kids would notice the new gadgets...

    It was a pretty beautiful system, really. The kids got money so they could buy whatever they wanted (which probably made them appear more popular, since they could spend more money on stuff). Meanwhile, they also had all the cool products that hadn't hit the streets yet, which increased demand. The kids became popular, and the companies sold more products.

    Astroturfing feels a little "icky", but as long as the companies aren't requiring the users to promote the products in a favorable light, then I think it's all right. If you're *required* to like the products, then you've become a salesperson, and should disclose that fact.

    And just because somebody mentions Dr. Pepper in a blog, doesn't mean you have to go an buy it. If a blog you read starts handing out too many bad "endorsements" of products, guess what? You're going to stop reading. So I think there's a self-corrective measure built in to the system.

  90. horrid sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are about the content, their words, their thoughts. Not the outward appearance, the sheel of their thoughts, the messenger. It is all about their ideas.

    Well that and the kewl pixs they do in photoshop. Or their web cams, of girls ... with the cute pictures ..... and the drooling, I mean...

    But it is all about their thoughts.

    1. Re:horrid sites by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Well so what? People still have to process the visual parts of the site to get to what passes for 'content', no matter how much you pontificate and pine over the supposed hyper-existentiality of a web-based diary.

      If they really cared enough about it, they'd make reading their thoughts not so much of an exercise in headache- and insanity-avoidance for others.

      A lack of presentation skills does not equate to enhanced intelligence or depth of insight.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  91. Title is wrong by ahaning · · Score: 1

    There is no period in Dr Pepper. There's a joke I remember reading about bad similes and one was something like "...he was missing but not noticed, like the period in Dr Pepper..."

    (Just one of those things that helps you remember. Like, "Never use a preposition to end a sentance with.")

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  92. slashdot is not a blog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Its a colaborative trollart extravaganza!

    Shit, we should get a grant from the NEA!

  93. Does this really help? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    I've glanced over the website, and I still don't have a freaking clue what they're selling. To me, that's not exactly effective advertising.

    1. Re:Does this really help? by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to tell you what they are selling. It only has to tell you that you are missing out on something new and that you need to pay attention. Eventually they will be more blatent about the product.

      robi

    2. Re:Does this really help? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      With attention spans as short as they are these days? I don't think I can even pay attention long enough to finish this messa

  94. Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who knows where the link is to this Nicole's weblog? its "popular" so someone should know this.

  95. All Your Blog is Belong to Us by serutan · · Score: 1

    This isn't the first attempt to use blogs as billboards. Looks like some ad weenies figured out that they can't fake authenticity, so they decided to try buying it. IANAL, but deliberately concealing the fact that advertising is advertising seems like fraud to me.

    One way to respond to this, if you don't like it, is to stop buying all Dr. Pepper products and let the company know you are not buying until they publicly apologize and terminate this ad campaign. You can tell them on their (flash) consumer contact page. Of course they could lie about that too I guess.

    Then have a Coke and a smile.

  96. Idea borrowed from Gibson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how William Gibson discusses a similar thing in Pattern Recognition ... people were paid to wander around clubs and popular meeting places and casually mention products at appropriate times.

  97. Merchants of cool... by Lysol · · Score: 1

    well, i didn't see anyone mention this as i scanned through so i might as well.

    merchants of cool is a frontline show and it's pretty darn good. it, dare i say exposes, nay, since quite a few people already know of the connections with corporate marketing and the media. no, it documents several groups of 'kids' and how they sell out and love it. a really good watch.

    as one who has grown up watching, through the 80's and 90's, the ever growing appetite of the mega-corp, i really can't feel sympathy much for anyone who sells their soul for an advertising buck. there's a lot of dots to connect across our various freedoms and some people have no problem relenquishing their freedom to be anonymous.

    but, even though i'm not that old, i'm sure i'm considered 'old skool' to the kids who think corporate advertising like this is cool. somewhow, to me, it just seems like the ultimate loss of self-respect.

  98. What would Jerry Pournelle say? by whyde · · Score: 1

    Jerry Pournelle was perhaps more of a trendsetter in pimping out his blog than he realized. I could just imaging this text taken from his articles:


    Jerry Pournelle
    Chaos Manor
    Byte Magazine ...After spending two hours on the phone with Raging Cow tech support, we figured out how to suppress the projectile vomiting. It works much better than YooHoo.

    Recommended.

  99. Comments by W32.Klez.H · · Score: 0

    There was a comment earlier that posted a link to a news story that criticized the blog itself, and that comment has been deleted. In fact, I had a few comments deleted, and I've been banned from posting on there. I recommend everyone post their favorite gibberish.

  100. Finally, something to invest in again! by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1

    >>Seems like this experiment could turn into the next "big thing" in advertising-- assuming people are willing to sell out their blog space. Bloggers beware!"

    This is great!

    I hope I can by into the IPO's of these bloggers early and often. I need to make up all that money my 401K lost from the last "big thing."

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

  101. oh! you said 'PROMO' merchandice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The first time I read that article blurb and I could have sworn it didn't say promo...

    made up of six people mostly in their late teens/early twenties who get porno merchandise as their only form of compensation


  102. Uh Oh.... we slashdotted Dr. Peper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now slashdot picks this story up, they might as well tell us they are going out of buisness due to this PR idea.

    I really was looking forward selling out and telling the two that read my blog, me and that spam software that keeps to harvist my email address.

    Finaly just a tip to those who are posting, don't mention it here until after they give you the promo.

  103. I wonder who these key bloggers are by ziriyab · · Score: 1
    One guess: Wil Wheaton :)

    Ok. It's not him, but here's an idea. There seems to be a list of teen bloggers at blogcontrol.theweblogreview.com. We can select teen as the category and monitor daily for mentions of Mad Cow or whatever it is they call it. At the first mention, the blog gets DOSd and the influential teen learns a lesson about the dangers of selling out (or at least learns to sell out for good money, not carbonated cow juice)

    Oh, and doing a search for Teen Bloggers on google isn't as scary as I thought.

  104. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... the question all of us SHOULD be asking is:

    Why does Raging Cow come in bottles?

    Oh, wait. That doesn't work...

  105. Sports + Nerds = ??? by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    I first read this, and thought it was a story about new artificial grass that Dr Pepper had analyzed. But then I realized that sports and nerds don't really go together....

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  106. OfficeMax comment of the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matty, Don't be so paranoid ... relax and have a cool Raging Cow (now with extra prions).

    note: support for comment also provided by Goodyear

  107. mmm Code Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I crazy, or is Code Red good stuff?

    If it weren't for all the other problems, associated with Mountain Dew as well, I'd drink it lots more.

    Instead, I'll stick to beer.

    mmmm... beer

  108. This is a paid post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to insert Dr Pepper bottle up my ass, and spilling some Dr Pepper all over my anus. And for extra pleasure I make my pygmy goat lick it off my shit encrusted butt. Nothing as glamorous as eating your own shit out of a Dr Pepper bottle. Dr Pepper, the number turd drink!

  109. Cycle by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ah, it's a new cycle. Suddenly there's a fresh new thing, blogs (which i never got anyways... how is posting stuff to a website different than what we were doing before blogs were big? but that's its own post). blogs are hip and cool and edgy, because people talk about anything and everything, from the mundane to the extraordinary. from work to movies to politics to sex.

    there are no boundaries, etc etc. some of these bloggers start to get extremely popular -- popular enough for big companies to notice. an untapped market! there are tens of thousands of blogs and millions of regular readers. the 10 most popular blogs get more traffic than some daily newspapers. the people who write these things are influential, because the readers can identify with them and their daily struggle/musings/etc.

    so now the marketers recruit the bloggers and pay them to endorse their product. it seems great at first -- we can have edgy *and* corporate messages. but then someone goes too far. they talk politics or say something in very poor taste and the company's lawyers get worried that they will be identified as promoting this kind of thought/talk/ideology. not good for the company's image, which said company spends $10s of millions promoting each year.

    the company implements one tiny rule. and then another slip-up, and another rule, etc etc.

    now instead of a "stream of consciousness public journal" you have what amounts to be a person being paid by a company to endorse their product and not talk about "bad things" and it ceases to become what made it so popular in the first place and blogs join other less-exciting media channels like radio, tv, and the pre-previews at the movies.

    1. Re:Cycle by sgage · · Score: 1

      "Suddenly there's a fresh new thing, blogs (which i never got anyways... how is posting stuff to a website different than what we were doing before blogs were big? but that's its own post)."

      Oh Happy Day! I'm not alone! "Blogs" (what a disgusting word - sounds like what someone does if they drink too much) are nothing but fucking websites. What's new about "blogging"?

      I don't get it either.

      What a crock of shit. Can't anyone live an unmediated life anymore? Are we all going to end up as corporate whores?

  110. DAMN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That got me hot! Where do I sign up???
    Slow down, cowboy! That's what the bitches will be saying!

  111. Two words by dkone · · Score: 1

    who cares?

  112. BLOG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does the term "Blog" sound like a fucking retard invented it?

    Is it THAT much harder to type WEblog? Two extra characters?

  113. Get paid to surf sex sites by bitrott · · Score: 1

    Blogging is mental masterbation. May as well get paid to do it if that's your thing. The rest of us who are too busy to blither on endlessly about ourselves will continue looking away embarrassed.

  114. Rather Be Paid Than Be Free Fodder for Slashdot by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Would I let someone compensate me for writing this nonsense on my own site instead of giving it free to Slashdot?

    You betcha.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  115. "Blogging phenomena" itself is astroturf! by aquarian · · Score: 1

    There's been so much buzz in the last couple of years about the "blogging phenomena" -- itself an astroturf campaign, nothing but a big, self-promotional circle-jerk among a certain clique of writers, programmers, pundits, and promoters. It grew from there, but there was nothing organic about it.

  116. Loooooosers by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    This will separate the Men from the Prosthetics.

    I've seen this before in numerous industries. There's no faster way to kill a movement or deep-six yourself than to jump on the greed train. Ironically, you won't even make any money this way. People who sold out in the sixties and became Yupies did so simply by getting jobs. --Bloggers are different. When they sell out, they're dumping their premier product; Honest Voice. --Which leave them exactly nowhere.

    Imagine, for instance if you found out one day that Wil Wheaton didn't actually like any of the books and CD's and stuff he promotes on his site? --If Dr Pepper was getting the privilege by giving Wil free baseball caps and as much of their wet-fart drink as he could keep down.

    Wil would lose his respect in an instant and become just another loser.

    Of course, I may be wrong. I have this endless tendency, no matter how low my opinion of the Average Slob drops, to assume that people are offended by this kind of thing the same way I am. I forget that many people actually have a 'favorite corporation' and wear their swishes and arm bands with pride.


    -Fantastic Lad

    1. Re:Loooooosers by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      People who sold out in the sixties and became Yupies did so simply by getting jobs.

      Don't look now, but it sounds like you've already bought into a fabricated 'reality' put out by people marketing an 'image.' People like Oliver Stone, etc.

      People didn't 'sell out in the sixties and become Yuppies.' Yuppies in some cases were former 60's counter-culture types, but they 'sold out' in the mid to late 70's and the 80's.

      The 'movement' that was killed from back then crashed due to huge layers of contradiction. The upper middle-class 'hippies', for instance, wanted their women 'prone' and submissive. Self-indulgent utopian drug users really aren't capable of 'building a new society,' and things got violent and angry after awhile. Even if you're going to buy into the whole 'Woodstock' marketing hype, you'd best spend some time researching the Altamont concert that happened later that same year. Violent, ugly, and full of hate. Brought to you by the Grateful Dead.

      Any 'movement' begins being sold out about the time more than a few percent of the people become aware of it. That's just how it works.

  117. Microsoft & Dr Peper R000XX0r5!!!!111!!! LOL!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please credit this Astroturfing to my Microsoft Astroturf Account (MSA#39893) and to my Dr. Pepper Astroturf Account (DRPA#3240848).

    Seriously, do they really want this? I do not have the belief that any advertising is good advertising, poorly represented and pathetic ones can really do damage and are ineffective IMHO.

    I don't think Joe Sixpack Blogger will be a good representative for the product they are hawking, and I really am not influenced by someone who I don't know puts an ad in their journal that hardly anyone reads.

    I also wonder just how easy this will be, what they require, and if they limit what you can say.

  118. ad Nauseam by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2, Funny

    check the dialy show online's clips with Steve Carell here:

    http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_shows/thedailyshow withjonstewart/videos_corr.jhtml?p=carell

    click on all the ad nauseam clips to laugh and fully understand the evil that is advertising :-)

  119. Part of their TV campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the doofus hyping "product placement" with disastrous consequences?

  120. and in other news by British · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pfeizer will be teaming up with LiveJournal.com to test out new antidepressants for various teens. Results from the new antidepressants can be measured by the "Current mood" feature pesent on most livejournal entries.

  121. Poochie to the max! Rad! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    "Is there anything that's not X-TREME these days?

    Common sense.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  122. Omnipresent advertisements by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    Personally, I try to avoid advertisements and I do pretty well. It can go days between me seeing one - most often it's billboards or in journals when it does happen. (I have a huge blacklist for Phoenix.) The town I live in also has a medium-to-big street culture group that does defacement and propaganda, which I find a refreshing break from the drone of sponsored media.

    I really started freaking out once when I thought I heard commercials in my dreams. I thought it was like in Futurama. Turns out that the neighbours had the radio on so loud and that where the ads came from - I woke up a few minutes later and if you've ever awoken to the radio, you might know what that can be like.

    I don't want to do business with corporations who try to trick me, and I view most advertisments as a form of trickery or manipulation.

    They want to 'reach' me? Well, they can try ethical behaviour, and maybe then I'll seek them out. Maybe.

  123. Need septic tank flush? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Need non-toxic hydraulic fluid? Try Raging Cow!

    Okay, where is my free stuff?

    Advertisers should be aware that astro-turfing can get out of control very easily.

  124. Now we know why they advertised on FARK.COM!!! by BenJeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dr. Pepper bought advertising space from Fark.com a while back... I guess it was a test for future plans.

    Gotta hand it to them for figuring out a way to use the internet to their advantage - I'm all in favor of it as long as they aren't spamming me.

  125. Please Leave Real Life Alone by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    It reminds me a lot of this earlier tactic for getting people hooked onto playing games on cell phones. As I recall, the variant was to have a few hot chicks playing cell phone games in bars so that onlooking guys in the bar would assume that acquisition of said merchandise was the new magic bullet to Success with Women.

    But please. My mental environment is already overly polluted with high-pitched sales "information" that crowds out reflection, creative thinking, following a logical train of thought, etc.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  126. Annonymous Coward, THE brand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That Annonymous Coward knows everything!

    He's the most prolific poster on slashdot!

  127. Naturally by washirv · · Score: 1

    This is similar to Google realizing that there's plenty of ad-space going a-begging on blogs. Google will be making the ads more prominent, presumably these guys will be inserting the advertising into the copy. But really, the principle's the same.

  128. Wait a second. . . MILK and Dr Pepper???? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Did I mis-read that?

    Isn't that only one ingredient shy of the, Make Yourself Sick And Stay Home From School, drink?


    -Fantastic Lad --Mmm. Pukey.

  129. Just what I've been waiting for by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    All the flavor of Dr. Pepper, and all the healthy aspects of Milk.

  130. Dr Pepper, dairy-based? Prune-based, I'll believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr Pepper, dairy-based? Prune-based, I'll believe. Unless that's diary-based, then, oh, great. Like I really care. What was the Dr Pepper knock-off. Mr T. Or Tibbs. Tasted the same.

  131. Re:Shakira by rirugrat · · Score: 1
    Or maybe they should think about picking up Britney Spears now that Pepsi has dropped her for Shakira...

    On SpanishDot, all your Shakira are belong to us!

    Chris

  132. Sign up Stile. by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would LOVE to see StileProject promoting Dr. Pepper.

    Too bad the Goatse man is dead...

  133. Blogging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me for asking and appearing to be so lame, but what is a blogger... what does it mean to "blog"?

  134. Left though education? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in some cases so far left because of "brainwashing" by educational institutions.

    I agree with your post, for the most part... But I strongly disagree with this statement. I am almost 25 (2 weeks from now...), I am very far to the left, but to blame it on my education is just wrong. I was a centrist who thought that the USA did the right thing most of the time, until I graduated and got into the real world. The only religiously oriented book that my (public) high school used for text was a book entitled 'the bible as literature', all of my economics classes (I took 4 of them, which is a lot for an engineer...) started with the premise that capitalism is superior.
    How can the fact that I am an anti-(Iraq)-war, Athiest, borderline-socialist now, be blamed on my education then?

    The anti-war left is getting censored in our educational system right now. You can call me a liberal all you want, and all the dirty names that come along with that one, I will take it with pride, but I got this way by opening my mind, not through my education...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Left though education? by adzoox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First you should feel lucky that you live in a country that allows you say things like you did, allows political freedom and religious freedom - I suppose you do not want that for Iraq, which has neither.

      If in any way you are saying that professors and teachers in K-12/college are not liberal minded - then think again. How can it be possible without strong political parents (which there are few and far between) to influence children? Children and young adults are being educated in a system that is bias and being bombarded by bias media. Most children don't understand our tax system, want socialized medicine, taxes on the productive people in society to be unfair and unbalanced, and see nothing wrong with behaviours of our last President.

      The real world should teach you that you don't need intrusion into your life and assistance without earning it (wellfare, quotas, etc)

      The real world should teach you that if you like to smoke (it's bad for you, but your choice) that you can without being taxed up the wazoo, that you can drive without paying gas tax up the wazoo, that you can have CAPITALIZED medicine so you don't have to go to another country like the Canadians do for healthcare, that you say what you want, believe what you want. That's the real world. The real world in a socialized, peacenik, moral devoid society led to the Sept 11th bombing - Al Queda had no regard for human life, told members they were going to heaven, and blamed it partially on the USA capitalistic nature, which if didn't exist would stop the world COLD.

      Thank you for your opinion, most people post, as the author of the original post did; Anonymous Coward.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:Left though education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, in short:

      YAAAY FOX NEWS!!!

      YAAAY FASCISM!!!

      asshole.

      of course you'll use this to justify yourself. brilliantly stupid.

    3. Re:Left though education? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      First you should feel lucky that you live in a country that allows you say things like you did, allows political freedom and religious freedom - I suppose you do not want that for Iraq, which has neither.

      I want them to have it, but I do not think it is our place to give it to them.

      If in any way you are saying that professors and teachers in K-12/college are not liberal minded - then think again. How can it be possible without strong political parents (which there are few and far between) to influence children? Children and young adults are being educated in a system that is bias and being bombarded by bias media. Most children don't understand our tax system, want socialized medicine, taxes on the productive people in society to be unfair and unbalanced, and see nothing wrong with behaviours of our last President.

      You say a lot of things here, but I don't understand what any of them have to do with our educators being far left. Most people educated elsewhere in the world (not in our 'far left' system) agree with most of the things that you claim are absurd. No one outside of this country cares about Clinton's dick...

      The real world should teach you that you don't need intrusion into your life and assistance without earning it (wellfare, quotas, etc)

      I don't like quota's either, I think that they were usefull, but have outlived that period. If we insist on sticking to quotas, I would like to see them based on non-ethnic factors (parents education level, parents income...). Welfare on the other hand is a very good idea. having welfare (for short term use) helps stabilize the economy. I would like to see it get harder for people to spend long periods of time on welfare.

      The real world should teach you that if you like to smoke (it's bad for you, but your choice) that you can without being taxed up the wazoo

      So that you can become a burden on a largely tax supported medical system...

      that you can drive without paying gas tax up the wazoo

      so you have to own a SUV to get around on the poorly maintained roads.

      that you can have CAPITALIZED medicine so you don't have to go to another country like the Canadians do for healthcare

      The canadian system is only one example, Germany has mostly-socialized medicine as well, and you never hear about them going without non-ecential procedures.

      The real world in a socialized, peacenik, moral devoid society led to the Sept 11th bombing

      Could you explain the connection there?
      I always thought that they were mad at us (for many reasons on the surface) for one real reason; people in our society have a lot (money, stuff, power) and they don't. Jealousy is a very human thing to experience, as long as most americans are not miserable, and people in other parts of the world are, people in other parts of the world will hate americans. To me it alwasy seemed that the right was more to blame for the hatred of americans thing than anyone else.

      It really seems to me that you are just pissed off about the left, and want to blame liberalism on something, the educational system seemed like a good target.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    4. Re:Left though education? by Jus+ad+Bellum · · Score: 1

      Want me to Super-Size that for you?

  135. Those fuckers by siskbc · · Score: 1
    It's like those Tufts students who let spammers use their email accounts for $20.00 a month.

    Yeah, and I still want to give those little fuckers the "sack o' doorknobs" treatment. Anybody wanna make a road trip to Tufts?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Those fuckers by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Sure lets go. Then we can celebrate our success with a nice cold and refreshing red bull with its citrus taste and mind enhancing juices.

      If redbull pays for the bus and other expenses to Tufts then it will be endorsement for me. This might be a good idea actually. Not selling short in my book. I think if they did this, tens of thousands of slashdotters would buy it and in turn would be quite a successfull advertising campaign.

  136. selling out by qoncept · · Score: 1

    Bloggers "selling out" ? Isn't that the point for most of them?

    --
    Whale
  137. are those blogs real or...? by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 2, Insightful
    colleagues,

    the raging cow site, which looks like a blog, at least superficially, has links to six blogs on the lower right of the screen.

    i take is these are supposed to be the "blogs" that are doing the advertizing? THESE ARE FAKES!!! look at them. they're all designed by the same person. they're all banal pap. they're not real!

    am i just crazy? i think these were set up specifically for the purpose of this ad campaign. please tell me i'm nuts.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:are those blogs real or...? by zztzed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope. As best I can tell, most of them are real. This is judging by the registration dates... suchadork.net was registered at the end of July 2002; aboutagirl.org/com was registered in October '01. Sparkley.net was registered in October 2000. Kelleyrogers.com was registered in June '02, but using Godaddy's "private registration" thing which is somewhat fishy but plausible nonetheless. As a side note, she has a Raging Cow button on her webpage. ("The revolution will be homogenized" indeed.) Boymeetslife.com was registered in May 2002. Italianize.com was registered in September 2001.

      Make of this what you will. If any of them are fake, it's probably the ones registered last year. The rest of them I'd give the benefit of the doubt.

    2. Re:are those blogs real or...? by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. I'm thinking, though, that some sort of makeover was given to these sites. they're too slick, and they look like they were desgned by the same person. they ALL have a webcam. the webcams are all similar looking. the use of html, iframes, javascript... it's too good. ah, whatever.

      --
      There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:are those blogs real or...? by zztzed · · Score: 1
      I've noticed that it's not uncommon for personal-journal-type blogs like these to have cams and slick-looking design -- in fact, it's basically the rule rather than the exception. Hit up any cam portal site (like camrecord.com), pick a random cam, hit the "personal website" link, they all look like this. Whether they are all blessed with this design talent or spent a lot of time cultivating it, got a friend to do it for them, or got a shiny new blog makeover in return for plugging Raging Cow, I don't know, but they're all equally likely scenarios and none of them would surprise me.

      For what it's worth, I've stumbled across some other articles about this, via MetaFilter. As far as I can tell, it's not quite as sinister as it's made out to be. True, Dr. Pepper is giving these kids free crap, but they're not telling them what to say, at least according to an interview with one of the masterminds of the project. Specifically, he says:
      I think if people will take the time, like you did, to really look at what we're doing, they'll realize we're not telling anyone what to say about our product. We're giving it to them and hoping they pass the word. No one is getting a ton of money so they have no reason to lie on their site about the drink. As Andrew Springate said, it's the magic of word of mouth. That's the oldest form of marketing there is, just coupled with a new technology.
      So again, make of this what you will. While I realize those in the marketing business can't be trusted, I think they're fully aware of the amount of bad PR shit that would hit the fan if it came to light that they actually were bribing these people to plug the product, so I figure either they're keeping it tightly under wraps (which is probably easier said than done) or he's telling the truth. I'm more inclined to believe the latter, but I'm probably not cynical enough.
  138. "Pigs" troll is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Once the surprise hit troll on slashdot, the "Pigs" troll is dying. Let's look at the numbers, "Pigs" snagged approximately 3,254 clueless biters in the period 1/10/2003 - 1/17/2003. But, in the current period, "Pigs" and "Pigs" derivative trolls have only lured a paltry 121 responses.

    In a sad effort to broaden the brand, veteran trollmaster Amsterdam Vallon has tried to appropriate a page from the "*BSD is dying" and "$celeberty found dead" trolls by retooling and retargeting new markets. Unfortunately, while this works well for "*BSD" and "dying", "Pigs" is poorly structured to pull off this madlib-like repurposing successfully.

    This bodes ill for "Pigs", which most likely will continue to bleed energy best spent on R&D on new trolls, spiralling into death. If this trend continues, "Pigs" will end up dying in obscurity just like "[%s ate my balls!]". Hopefully this will be a quick, clean death and "Pigs" won't sadly linger on like that clueless noob that keeps trying to get first post by replying to other's posts.

  139. Selling Out by athiest · · Score: 1

    If people are willing to sell out their blogs? Since when has there ever been a shortage of people willing to sell-out on anything?

  140. Not all Bloggers Are Dumb by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    Bloggs follow a trend for a bit, then dump it and move on. That is their nature.

    They accelerate a trend's time line. Faster upswing and mainstream recognition, faster crash and end of free marketing. It all evens out.

    I happen to believe that like the OSS programmers sticking to their issues, some bloggs will never "sell out" by blatent sponsored postings. OSS isn't the only community to have moral reasons for sticking to a position/decision/political party/country or residence.

    robi

  141. Ewwwww by pHsHsTK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Raging Cow? mmmmmm give me the crab juice instead.

  142. Oh... by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    ...blogger off!!

  143. so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News flash... this isn't a new technique at all. Marketers have been giving free clothes, drinks, etc to "key influence' people to go clubbing with for YEARS. They've paid attractive young people to take their fancy digital cameras out, and pretend to be a pair of newlyweds wanting strangers to help them take honeymoon photos. Etc. Etc. So what... Kids these days like playing on the web, so companies add the "cool kids" of the web to their marketing mix.

  144. Easy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They realized anyone who reads and posts to fucks must have a IQ lower then 10, and the burger flippers that make up most of fucks users would never have the money to afford one or pay for one.

    1. Re:Easy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow. A lot of venom there.
      There's probably a story behind that.

      Who cares.

    2. Re:Easy.. by scarolan · · Score: 1

      He probably got banned from FARK and is just bitter about it. Get outta your parent's basement and get some fresh air, man.

  145. My first post about this subject was lame... by dkone · · Score: 2, Funny

    All I said was who cares. But then I went to the raging cow website and I realized that I care. Now that I have read a blog of a make believe cow, I am repentant on my cynicism. I never realized how cool a cow could be once it was personafied by the art of blogging. I am thinking of getting a cowectomy, or at least a botox injection.

    Please wake up people and stop thinking up stupid advertising shit. Go look at a real cow sometime. They are big, smelly and stupid but they are anything but cool.

  146. The art of pitching a blog by sjgman9 · · Score: 1

    It never ceases to amaze me how incredibly naive these public relations and marketing folks are. Their intentions to "pitch a blog" to sell products will backfire. ]

    [small objection -- for free beer I will shill anything that isnt milwaukee's best light. I'll tell everyone that im shilling the beer and then ill invite friends over to swill the shilled beer]

    Blogs -- especially blogs that have been around for a while -- have established readership that knows what to expect. Blogs are set up as a portal of independent thought -- a diary. If we want mass market media, we read the newspapers of the content cartel.

    The established readership of a blog will probably sniff the bullshit out and go somewhere else.

    I wonder if anyone else sees that in that annoying Dr. Pepper ad, there is a representative of every single race in america. I dont see any asian men or black men, but the asian chick and the black chick are dancing to country music. There probably are a lot of asian and black women at a country revue in Nashville (or at least what Manhattan and Madison avenue think of Nashville).

    The funniest thing is that grizzled old dude on the spoons. What the hell?!?

    [this /. post brought to you by Doctor Pepper. Be hip - do what you do - Drink Dr. Pepper]

  147. How Ironic by skintigh2 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I ran a Dr Pepper rip off page (one of the first, not the best) and tried repeatedly to get any response from Dr Pepper. They had no interest in me whatsoever, and the one time I visited Texas and took the opportunity to take a photo of their sign, a SECURITY GUARD ran out and chased me away, as it was a SECURITY VIOLATION TO LOOK AT THE SIGN. What a bunch of assholes. Why the fuck do you put up a sign next to a fucking highway if you don't want people to look at it? And exactly how the fuck is looking at a fucking logo going to ,make a fucking difference to their "security?" (I am not aware if that guard's name was Rumsfeld)

    Anyway, when I got tired of my collection and knew others were, too, I wondered if Dr Pepper would want it for their Dr Pepper Museum. Although they make it impossible to find a way to contact them, I eventually did, and was replied to with a form letter about where I can buy merchadise.

    I felt loved.

    I'm glad I've been so loyal.

    Anyway, here is my sadly outdated page

    1. Re:How Ironic by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      They aren't very good at soda out there, most likely because they call it "pop," and they call frappes "milkshakes" and who knows what they call milkshakes.

      I'm pretty sure we don't have whatever the hell weird crap you Easterners call milkshakes. :-P

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  148. mod parent up - funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially if you remember all the commercials from the 70's and 80's!

  149. Sorry to appear ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but WTF is blogging

    1. Re:Sorry to appear ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <quote>
      A blog is often a mixture of what is happening in a person's life and what is happening on the Web, a kind of hybrid diary/guide site, although there are as many unique types of blogs as there are people.

      People maintained blogs long before the term was coined, but the trend gained momentum with the introduction of automated published systems, most notably Blogger at blogger.com. Thousands of people use services such as Blogger to simplify and accelerate the publishing process.

      Blogs are alternatively called web logs or weblogs. However, "blog" seems less likely to cause confusion, as "web log" can also mean a server's log files.
      </quote>

      From www.marketingterms.com/dictionary/blog/

  150. "Blog?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck this term, "Blog". Fuck it up its stupid ass.

  151. Raging is too long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Although I get the reference to raging bull.

    Why not shorten the brand to a shorter version with greater recall: "Mad Cow".

    It will sell like crazy.

  152. blogging for dollars... ? by djcatnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're kidding me, right? attention 99.9% of the world, nobody reads your blog! people don't even have the capacity to listen to anything but what clearchannel tells you to,jeesh.

    and I even have my own blog... Nobody reads it but my brother.

    --
    I make these: http://beatseqr.com
  153. Simulated Teen Scene by yintercept · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know why they are bothering to pay people to blog for the Product. You would think they could simply create a simulated teen with a random text generator. All that really matters is that the blog adds to the Google Rank and bumps up search results.

    1. Re:Simulated Teen Scene by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      You would think they could simply create a simulated teen with a random text generator.

      I don't know why they are, like, bothering to pay people to blog for the Product? You would think they could simply create a, like, "simulated" teen with a totally random text generator. All that really would matter is that the blog adds to the Google level and totally bumps up search results. Yeah.. you know?

    2. Re:Simulated Teen Scene by sethaw · · Score: 1

      > I don't know why they are bothering to pay people to blog for the Product. You would think they could simply create a simulated teen

      They could pay for a simulated teen, but then they would have to pay a programmer to write it. Also they would have to pay for someone to maintain and update it as new fads are created. This all costs money.

      Or they could give a few pieces of merchandise to a few individuals for little cost at all. This is cheaper, but with less control over the reviews. So, they pay people to blog because its cheaper than paying someone to make a simulated teen.

  154. Be You, Do what you do. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Be You, do what you do. Dr. Pepper. Be you, do what you do. Dr. Pepper. Be you, do what you do. Dr. Pepper.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  155. Obligatory Futurama quote... by taernim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leela: "Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?"

    Fry: "Well sure, but not in our dreams! Only on tv and radio...and in magazines...and movies. And at ball games, on buses, and milk cartons, and t-shirts, and bananas, and written on the sky. But not in dreams! No sirree."

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  156. Bassackwards by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

    The key influence bloggers are currently made up of six people mostly in their late teens/early twenties who get promo merchandise as their only form of compensation. In return, they get to "advertise however they want" through their blog. Seems like this experiment could turn into the next "big thing" in advertising-- assuming people are willing to sell out their blog space. Bloggers beware!"

    Don't you mean, "Readers of blogs beware"? The bloggers are not being sold -- the readers are.

    Get your media analysis straight.

    GF.

  157. help! by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    Dr. Pepper needs all the help they can get. Taco Bell stopped carrying Dr. Pepper and I called both corporate headquarters in protest. Taco Bell just isn't the same without it. Bring Dr. Pepper back Taco Bell!

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  158. What is this product? by complexmath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I spent 5 minutes browsing ragingcow.com and all I've learned is that someone has spent an inprdinate amount of time writing a blog using a cow persona. I have no interest in returning to the site, reading what's on the site, or indeed, finding out why someone is pretending to be a cow in the first place. What an incredibly lame marketing ploy.

    1. Re:What is this product? by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      But you aren't the target audience. The people [probably] they are after are the blogging crowd. The peoiple for whom this is their entertainment. Ever seen some of the stunts bloggers pull. Some are neat. Most are odd / stupid. That is just how things work in the free to publish [speech] free to read [beer] world of blogging.

      robi

  159. What's the difference? by ccnull · · Score: 3, Interesting

    99% of blogs exist solely to promote their creators and their works -- I know that's what mine is for, he said with no trace of irony. If anything, this just gives people a chance to stop droning on and on about themselves for a second. Seriously... I think the blog community is nifty, but honestly I'll be glad for the break from navel-gazing.

    PS Anyone need a plug? Paypal me...

  160. Whats new is not always better. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Well it IS stealing. There was an implied and unspoken common agreement between broadcasters and the greater society in general that in return for your free TV programs you had to endure commercials to fund their development and production. Sure no one actually signed any legal documents that clearly spelled out such a contract but it was so prevelant for so long that no one would even question it.

    Are you saying this should change just because of the INTERNET? I am fully confident that the media industry will figure out a way to deal with any future technologies that come along in a way that will allow them to rightfully so maintain their chokehold on the outlets of every single type of media imaginable.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Whats new is not always better. by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      > Well it IS stealing. There was an implied and >unspoken common agreement between broadcasters and >the greater society in general that in return for >your free TV programs you had to endure commercials >to fund their development and production. Sure no >one actually signed any legal documents that >clearly spelled out such a contract but it was so >prevelant for so long that no one would even >question it.

      The problem is, to be frank, we're changing and what we're being offered is changing.

      We're changing in that our attention spans are getting shorter and we're more easily jaded. We don't want to see a boring advert the 50th time just because we're impressed that we can get *any* signal in our 7 inch Philco TV.

      The advertisements we're being shown are changing too... can you imagine the 1950s family seeing one of those Pepsi commercials with the half-nude dancers, or looking confusedly at the advertisements that really don't explain their product well (prescription drugs are the worst of this, but IBM is pretty annoying about it too-- although theirs are funnier lately)?

      Finally, if we're tuning out, that means the advertisers are doing it wrong. It's that simple. Amuse us, and we watch. Keep changing it and we'll come back. And, most importantly, annoy us and we will leave or attempt to block the adverts.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    2. Re:Whats new is not always better. by Bvardi · · Score: 1

      Ok... so violating an "implied and unspoken agreement" is stealing? Then going to the bathroom is stealing if you do it during commercials? How many commercials am I required to watch before I am no longer stealing? If I blink when the corporate logo comes on am I stealing? That's where your logic is heading - the nature of the media is changing and the advertising world isn't necessarily keeping up. I agree, we have to understand advertising is a part of receiving something free (though I do object to more and more advertising being placed in paid services such as movies, DVD's, etc where there IS no unspoken agreement... but that is another argument entirely. My example of the PVR is how they are attempting to keep current advertising models despite changes in the media itself - which is a bad idea. So yes, things SHOULD change because of the internet - things SHOULD change because of PVR's, things SHOULD change as the way in which we consume media changes. That's the nature of things - TV advertising has changed since the early days (ironically in the early days shows were mostly sponsored and didn't necessarily have separate ads... something which might work better in these days of PVR's) Making a traditional model of advertising compulsory doesn't make it more effectively - it just restricts the consumer to what the media companies would like us to see. And that isn't going to do anyone any good. But all of what you said really missed the point anyways - fundamentally, we have to change the way in which advertising works. Media isn't going to be the traditional TV model in the future, it likely won't be the internet model - give it time and we'll end up with a mixture of streaming, video-on-demand, downloadable and packaged entertainment that will be different in scope from the traditional outlets we have now. So finding new ways to advertise is good - because I don't want to end up being forced to watch some idiot saying "dude you got a dell!" 50 million times because of an "unspoken agreement" that we have to use a traditional method of advertising.

  161. Dr Pepper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    As it was pointed out to me a few years ago, there is no period "." in Dr Pepper. There used to be but they dropped it in deference to the medical profession.

  162. Bah by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Self-respect is too expensive and its sure as hell not going to put a Lexus SUV in my garage! Forget food on my plate, I want an SUV in my garage!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  163. Ping Federal by Tugar · · Score: 1

    Will Blog for Ammo!

  164. The importance of hyping stealth marketing. by The+Babbler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothing is cuter than an MBA putting together a "viral" marketing plan, and then holding a press conference about it. A. Spokesman has seen this before. http://www.corporatebabble.com/comics.jsp?catid=19 &contid=51

  165. So what? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Who cares about being called a loser by some counter-culture LOSER when you'll have made a ton of money from "selling out"?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:So what? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Who cares about being called a loser by some counter-culture LOSER when you'll have made a ton of money from "selling out"?

      Oh, but they DO care. Deep down, the ego winces as an important piece of one's soul dies. This is why there is such energy invested in denial and in arguing the rationality of selling out, etc.

      Anyway, why do you ask?


      -Fantastic Lad

    2. Re:So what? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      selling out *what*, pray tell? Selling out on someone else's notion of what's 'kool'?

  166. She mentions it now! by Yanna · · Score: 1
    Oh yes, she already plugged the mad cow disease in her orangerie.

    A propos of nothing, she says "On a lighter note, I bet YOU ski better than I do...considering I have never tried".(YOU being the link to the Creutzfeldt-Jakob drink).

  167. Nike, Tommy Hilfiger by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    They did the same thing according to the book 'No Logo'. Give influential kids product to make it desirable by their peers. In Nikes, Hilfigers case give it to young, black inner city kids to create a 'need' amongst their peers.

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  168. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did I mention she is a cyberbeggar as well? She asks people to donate her money for her college and appartment...

    Me? I prefer street whores, at least they are honest about the way they earn their money.

  169. Ebola Cola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...was all the rage in the Transmetropolitan universe.

  170. Eh? by billybob · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're half-right, in that I've coded better pages by banging my hip into the keyboard. :)

    What the F is that supposed to mean? Are you trying to say you got fucked on your keyboard?

    --
    Joseph?
  171. We're helping plug the Good Doctor as we *speak*.. by Aropax20 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Has anyone stopped to think how this article is giving Dr Pepper a really thorough promotion? I mean, how many times has the product in question been mentioned in this article on /. so far? I heard a theory once that if J. Random Consumer is confronted with a name 7 times in quick succession, it'll stick!

    I don't drink the stuff, but I can guarantee I'll be thinking about it all day *grimace*

    Now there's an interesting way to advertise - get your product made the subject of a /. story... we've been had!

    Fly, my pretties! Storm those blogs and slashdot them to hell and back!!

  172. Advertisers over here! by Shawn+Baumgartner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, I can be bought. Willing to help advertise your beer and hookers, compensated only by product. Both must be fresh on delivery, one hot and one cold, you figure out which is which. Act now before I get drunk and laid and lose interest.

  173. Semi-existence of Bryon by 3ryon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know if any of you remember my site but I was one of the original bloggers. Anyway, sometime in ~1996 Intel took notice of my site and decided to make me a "beta user" of their new web cam. They asked nothing in return, but it was obvious that they were hoping to get a mention on my page (it was pretty popular...about 5,000 readers at its peak...remember this was the mid-90's). So, what I'm saying is that this is nothing new.

  174. Does advertising work? by Merk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may be the wrong place to ask this question since Slashdot is mostly computer geeks and not marketing geeks, but I'll try anyhow:

    Has there ever been a study that shows conclusively that advertising works?

    I ask this question because I know that there are times when it doesn't work. My dad used to work for the local phone company in an economics position. At one point a study came across his desk that said that in studies the phone company had done, the rate of advertising for long distance services had absolutely no effect on the rate of long distance calls. But did they stop advertising? No! His take on this was that advertising was so ingrained in the corporate culture that nobody was willing to get rid of it, even if it didn't work.

    Now this is one study of one service offered by a local monopoly so it's not anything I'd use to generalize, but I sure found it interesting. Here was a huge company that had seen a study saying that their advertising had no effect but they still kept advertising.

    I just wonder how much of advertising is based on sound science. I would imagine that there are situations where advertising does work. If people are unaware of a product, advertising can announce its existence. Another one I'm sure works is advertising sales or discounts. Again, informing a potential consumer of a fact that might change their mind about buying a product. But what about advertising for established brands? If Coke stopped advertising altogether, how much of an effect would it have on their bottom line? Do the costs of their ads pay for themselves in increased sales?

    I would love to see fewer ads. I already use an ad blocking proxy so I miss most of the ones on the web, but I still see commercials, billboards, magazine ads, and all kinds of other obnoxious things every day. Wouldn't it be great if someone could prove that most of these ads just don't work? I'd even be happier if they were replaced by more effective, informative ads. I just always have the impression that ads are chosen because the people with the advertising budget like them, not because anybody can show what effect they'll have on sales. Maybe I'm wrong?

    1. Re:Does advertising work? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Yes, ads work. The reason for 'New Coke' was that Pepsi was making serious inroads into Coke market share. Why? Advertising. The blind taste tests 'Choice of a New Generation' and all that stuff. For the most part, ads are not meant to give information or convince you to do anything. They are there to stick the name in your mind. You see 20 commercials for Pepsi, but aren't thirsty. Two days later in the store, you think "hey, I need some cola" and 'Pepsi' immediately springs into your mind.

      To your father's situation: when was he involved with this? If prior to AT&T divestiture, there was no competition, so what? If it was after, the advertising is there to prevent people from dropping at least as much as it is to entice new customers.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  175. Diet Vanilla Coke by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    I hated the Vanilla Coke classic. But Diet Vanilla Coke tastes great. If you like diet drinks, the diet vanilla is, IMHO, DA B0MBE.

    So I can't write off this recent (mind-boggling) push for alternative drinks (Pepsi Blue, Red Fusion, Diet Coke w/ Lemon, etc.) as a total wash.

    ^_^

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  176. bloggers positive about something????!!! by asscroft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're expecting teens/early 20s people to be positive about something? get off. I can't buy it. All I see are bloggers bitchin and whining unless it's about pr0n. I think Dr. Pepper would be better off paying them to diss their competition. THat's a natural fit for people this age. Then agian, maybe that's my generation (mid 20s). Maybe early 20s are happy and shit. Maybe they aren't cynical bastards full of pessimism. I doubt it ;-).

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  177. Don't you think this is part of their plan? by maxoutrocketmail.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Come on, guys (and girls)...

    A couple of bloggers wouldn't have that much influence on the community as a whole. But it is a low risk way of dipping their toe into another advertising medium.

    In any event, it would seem like any savvy marketer would prefer to leak "news" of astroturfing so that a big discussion is kicked off. And seeing all the coverage (including here) that came of it, it has worked.

    Oh - I read about this yesterday and happened across them at 7-11 today. I bought the Pina Colada Chaos. It tastes like watered down milk with some sweetener. Nothing I care for, but maybe the under 20 crowd wants watery sweet milk.

    --
    -- Remember Johnny, .sigs are for lo^Hewsers
    1. Re:Don't you think this is part of their plan? by Paranoid+Cheese+Sand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blogging is very overrated by the mass media. Every single (printed) story I've read on it heralds it as a revolution in reporting and acts like it's going to be the dominant way people get information very soon; when you get down to it it's just a million people with agendas bitching about stuff for their friends to read. I don't think that media ignorance of technology alone is enough to explain this, so the question in my mind is, why does the media hype blogging so? What stock could the mass media possibly have in the success or stagnation (as long as there are things to bitch about and people to run the sites it won't die) of blogging?

  178. Daypop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Dr.Pepper use Daypop to find the most infuential bloggers?

    And what's that list going to look like once Coke and Pepsi get in on the act? Truth in advertising? No way, it's just endless ruminations on the imponderable. Dairy pop. Pop diary. Dairy pop diary. Pop dairy diary pops. Snap crackle dairy pop diary. Pop pop diary fizz fizz dairy pop. Pop pop pop pop pop dairy and pop diary pop.

  179. Re:Dr Pepper, dairy-based? Prune-based, I'll belie by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

    Raging Cow? Do I sense this won't sell too well in the UK?

    --
    It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  180. I don't "get" blogging. by LazyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is anyone reading anyone else's daily adventures?
    Seems worse than reality TV (which I hate). Ugh.

    --

    If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  181. Hang out with. HANG out with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vegitable.

  182. Sponsored Slashdot Comments by ruzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always thought that Slashdot (or any other slash site) could make some money by having "sponsored" comments. Companies could list themselves as being available to be sponsored in comments. When a user posts a comment and marks it as a candidate for sponsorship (presumably by choosing a sponsor from a list), then the company gets emailed the post and dis/approves. For every comment they approve, they pay Slashdot some amount of money that could be split with the poster -- or maybe some amount of money towards a subscription.

    The comment would get posted as sponsored so that purists can filter them out. I think it would be generally good for software and web site reviews/comments.

    The bullshit thing about advertising is that companies can say whatever they want without backing it up, which means most of us have become very cynical about advertising -- and advertising in turn has become little more than an "awareness" tool. But commentary from users is usually pretty helpful (as long as it's not vague). Just look at the Switch campaign for Apple for a good example.
    __________________________

  183. Another important effect of advertising by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Familiarity is one of the most powerful effects of advertising. There is an almost hard-wired association between familiarity and comfort: people will often stick with what they know, even if it's a spouse that beats them up on a regular basis.

    Even if you ignore advertising, you must have noticed it. And by doing so, you have become significantly more familiar with it, especially in the short term.

  184. Step 1 by Zelph · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Create Blog.. Step 2: ... Step 3: Profit!

  185. I'm a faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!!!!!

  186. How many ways has Clear Channel reached you today? by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    That's the Clear Channel slogan. "How many ways has Clear Channel reached you today?". Really.

    Then again, they just reported a loss of $16 billion for the last 9 months. They may be overextended.

  187. I just don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who is READING the blogs. I really don't. I have no interest whatsoever in reading someone else's mental masturbation. Are there really that many people over the age of 13 who would take the time to read blogs besides their own? Show me the numbers please. Incessant drivel, meaningless pontification, textual diarrhea.

  188. great by Shadestalker · · Score: 1

    Thus creating, every day, more people I will want to punch in the face. And they won't even understand why.

  189. I'm a blogger.... by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    She's a blogger, wouldn't like to be blogger too?

  190. It's working so far by tregoweth · · Score: 1

    Slashdot basically gave them a free ad by posting this story. Oh, the irony.

  191. Re:IMPORTANT NEWS by the1onlychuck · · Score: 1

    Well, at these "re-education" camps, the terrorists will be ground into a pulp, and that will be marketed as "Light Chocolate Raging Cow".

    Then they'll make a fortune because 60% of America is obsessed with doing something like that to Muslims.

    Then, we'll all turn into terrorists ourselves from drinking Dr. Pepper sponsored (but not blogged) Terrorist Propoganda.

    You know what that means...

    --
    -Chuck http://www.geocities.com/cw11284/
  192. press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dpsu.com/nr_raging_cow.html

    Dr Pepper/Seven Up 'Milks' Raging Cow(TM) in Effort
    to Think 'Outside of the Barn'

    Milk With 'Attitude,' Tantalizing Flavors, Spirited Mascot,
    Help Expand Company's Beverage Portfolio

    A PASTURE IN PLANO, TEXAS, Jan. 28, 2003 - Cheered by a rowdy mascot, Dr Pepper/Seven Up executives today announced the creation of Raging Cow(TM), a new milk-based product served cold in single servings, with an array of five alluring flavors. Packaged in plastic bottles, Raging Cow will appear in selected markets beginning in early March, eventually expanding to national distribution.

    "Raging Cow is a very different way of looking at flavored dairy drinks," stated Dr Pepper/Seven Up President and Chief Operating Officer Mike McGrath. "This product does not have a herd mentality and therefore is unlike any other milk-based product on the market. We describe it as a milk-based drink 'gone wild' because there are outrageous, intriguing and delicious flavor combinations. Raging Cow also creates a new opportunity in our portfolio of offerings."

    Consumer testing confirmed for Dr Pepper/Seven Up that people want new, exciting dairy drink products. "With flavors such as Piña Colada Chaos, Jamocha Frenzy, Berry Mixed Up, Chocolate Caramel Craze and Chocolate Insanity, Raging Cow has something for everyone," McGrath concluded.

    "The consumer research we conducted helped us identify young adults as the primary audience for Raging Cow, although anyone who likes milk is likely to embrace this product," explained Andrew Springate, Dr Pepper/Seven Up director of brand marketing. "Having escaped from a dairy where milk was the only option, Raging Cow's unpredictable and mischievous mascot symbolizes the independence and enthusiasm of the brand's target consumers. We wanted a representative that would reflect the adventurous spirit in people, a creature with a flair for making a point. We found a perfect bovine, and she is 'udderly' overjoyed to be promoting Raging Cow until the cows come home," declared Springate. "Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending upon how you view it, her only utterance is an occasional 'primal moo,' which is tantamount to a bovine scream."

    Raging Cow is a brand of Plano, Texas-based Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., which is the largest division of London-based beverage and confectionery firm Cadbury Schweppes plc (NYSE: CSG). Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. is the largest producer of non-cola soft drinks in North America, with about 16 percent of the carbonated soft drink market. In addition to Dr Pepper and 7 UP, the company's other leading brands include A&W Root Beer, Canada Dry, Sunkist, Hawaiian Punch, Squirt and Schweppes, as well as the RC Cola and Slush Puppie brands.

  193. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FORTRAN is usefull for anyone who wants to work for the famously well funded science projects instead of real world tech.

    Wait, what was my point ?

  194. Re:Dr Pepper, dairy-based? Prune-based, I'll belie by I+Love+Soup · · Score: 1

    There are no prunes in Dr Pepper.
    http://www.snopes.com/business/secret/drpepper.htm

    --
    - Soup is really good.
  195. Day 337 by andrewski · · Score: 1

    My bones have become soft and mushy because of the new beverage. They said it contained milk products - I believed them. I haven't been able to move in over three months, so I depend on my daily Raging Cow IV to be hung by the friendly Dr. Pepper people.

    Day 392

    Oh god, I think I am going to metamorphose! My body has begun to cornificate into a giant cocoon like structure. I am scared. They are bringing more and more Raging Cow every day now.

    Day 396

    Help me! Somebody please, have mercy on me!

    Day 593

    MOOOOOOOOOO! (as a giant cow emerges from the cornified cocoon)

  196. Sad if kids wouls fall for this by iion_tichy · · Score: 1

    But I think the inventors of that scheme are missing the point of blogging. It's not that blogging is inherently cool, it's usually that people have something interesting to say - and that they are not repetitive, either. Do I really want to read a blog about someones daily obsession with a dairy product??? I think not.

  197. Even better incentive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...mostly in their late teens/early twenties who get promo merchandise as their only form of compensation..."

    Who else read that as *porno* merchandise? :D

    But seriously folks, who names a product "Raging Cow"? Never heard of Mad Cow Disease (BSE)?

  198. PETA troubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that it's a dairy beverage, they may get the unwelcome attention of PETA. Now that will be entertaining. Especially if their ALF friends get involved. We might see a REAL Flame war.

  199. Too Much Marketing by tacocat · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much is too much.

    First that started with the active blocks at the top of your web pages. Then they went to pop-up/pup-under ads. Banner farms...

    Now you can find people at Amazon who write wonderful reviews about things in too much market-speak. And when you chase them down on the Amazon website you find out that this one person posted hundreds of reviews in a matter of seconds.

    So we can't trust the implied User feedback to be honest, rather another Marketing shill pushing their wares.

    Now we are entering the blog-space and we soon won't be able to know if someone really likes a product or if they are just getting paid to say so.

    And the more they push, the more people don't care. And they more they want to get away from it all.

    I will not buy a cellular phone becase I do not want to invite myself to the torrent of additional advertisements to buy supplimentary goods. And the idea of having ads piped into my cell phone makes me wretch.

    And I'm learning that there is less and less that I need to buy and that most of what you hear on any media is that you really must buy this or that. Well, I don't. I have food, clothing, a house. I'm good.

    And that really pisses them off.

    What do you sell a society that has everything and more?

    How do you sell it to them?

  200. Taking a line from a SNL skit... by ColoradoZippy · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...it was terrific, much better than Cats...I'll [drink] it again and again!" Now, that didn't sound forced, did it?

  201. Beware my ass! by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

    Are there any porn companies out there that want me to plug for them? Please? PLEASE!
    http://www.throatpunch.com

    --
    Carpe Deez
  202. Selling what. . ? I'll tell you. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    selling out *what*, pray tell? Selling out on someone else's notion of what's 'kool'?

    There is Honesty and there is Dishonesty. There is Service to Self and there is Service to Others. There is Creation and there is Destruction. . .

    'Selling Out' is what we call it when somebody shifts away from Honest, Other-Serving, Creative behavior patterns so that they embrace dishonest, self-serving, destructive patterns. --And they do it because they had a price and somebody named it.

    In a word, people sell their *integrity*. Pray told.

    And, surprise! --As it happens I don't actually think that this is, 'kool'.


    -Fantastic Lad

  203. Um, Dr. Pepper???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... everyone knows that _real_ coders drink Vanilla Coke or TAB. But some may like Regular Coke, Pepsi, Pepsi Twist, RC Cola, Canada Dry, Dad's Root Beer, 7Up (make 7up yours!), Mountain Dew, Sprite, Code Red, and Cherokee Red.

    Now I _will_ be expecting several large cases of each brand for my advertising of said products! ;-)

  204. Can you hear me Dr.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Dr. Pepper come in bottles?

    Because can tabs cut his dick.

    Badoom-crash!

  205. Re:Selling what. . ? I'll tell you. . . by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

    A lot of times the people one hears accusing other people of 'selling out' are members of a subculture, and the 'selling out' has nothing to do with integrity, and everything to do with growing tired of the subculture and quitting it.

  206. Watch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch the ad and the ego. Or maybe Manufactoring Consent.

  207. On a related note by csmiller · · Score: 1

    Here is someone auctioning off his middle name for the Comic Relief charity, who hold bi-annual Donate-a-phons, called Red Nose Day.
    The current winner is "Slurms" for 90 UKP, previous was "Lethargy", for 85 UKP.

    --
    It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --- Albert Einstein
  208. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Oxygen is a very toxic gas and an extreme fire hazard. It is fatal in
    concentrations of as little as 0.000001 p.p.m. Humans exposed to the
    oxygen concentrations die within a few minutes. Symptoms resemble very
    much those of cyanide poisoning (blue face, etc.). In higher
    concentrations, e.g. 20%, the toxic effect is somewhat delayed and it
    takes about 2.5 billion inhalations before death takes place. The reason
    for the delay is the difference in the mechanism of the toxic effect of
    oxygen in 20% concentration. It apparently contributes to a complex
    process called aging, of which very little is known, except that it is
    always fatal.

    However, the main disadvantage of the 20% oxygen concentration is in the
    fact it is habit forming. The first inhalation (occurring at birth) is
    sufficient to make oxygen addiction permanent. After that, any
    considerable decrease in the daily oxygen doses results in death with
    symptoms resembling those of cyanide poisoning.

    Oxygen is an extreme fire hazard. All of the fires that were reported in
    the continental U.S. for the period of the past 25 years were found to be
    due to the presence of this gas in the atmosphere surrounding the buildings
    in question.

    Oxygen is especially dangerous because it is odorless, colorless and
    tasteless, so that its presence can not be readily detected until it is
    too late.
    -- Chemical & Engineering News February 6, 1956

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...