Domain: fuckmeter.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to fuckmeter.com.
Comments · 69
-
Re:woulda been nice to know it was PDF ...
I guess the severity of this problem depends on the browser you're using. In FireFox and IE, hovering your mouse over the link changes the status bar to the target URL... Glance down and you'll know it's a PDF, takes half a second.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter. -
Fun, no, prudent, yes
I don't have any fun/funny password tales to share, but I can share a story about true password protection.
The year was 1999. I was working at a computer-related company, I won't call it a "startup" or a "dotcom" but it was similar. There were three sysadmins, and the owner didn't trust any one admin with the ability to login as root by himself. So a compromise was reached.
Each of the three admins chose a password. The three passwords were combined into one monster, master, root password. In order to login as root, all three admins needed to be present, to type their portion of the password in the correct order. Once all three admins typed in, a root login was achieved and whatever duty was necessary would be performed.
So, what if one of the 3 admins got hit by a bus on the way to work? There was a contingency plan. Each of the three of us entrusted our password to one of the other two. In the event of an emergency, assuming two of the three admins were present, the full password could be reconstructed. For example,
Admin A's password was apple, and he told that to Admin B
Admin B's password was blueberry, and he told that to Admin C
Admin C's password was cherry, and he told that to Admin A
So if Admin B got runover by a train, Admin A and Admin C could still login as root (because Admin C knew Admin B's password part), change the root password, and do whatever needed to be done.
The benefit was that, unless there was some sort of conspiracy, no one admin could ever login as root by himself and do anything crazy.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (NSFW) -
For those who don't get the reference
For those who don't get the reference, and why it's funny... There used to be a TV game show in the US called "The Newlywed Game." It featured recently married couples and the idea was to see how well they really knew each other. The host would ask the men a question, and in order to get points, the women would have to guess how their husband answered. (And vice versa, women would get a question and the husbands would try to predict their wives' answers.)
Some of the questions were tame, e.g. "Ladies, what is your favorite type of seafood?" If a guy's wife answered "Shrimp" but he had predicted "Flounder" they didn't get a point. You get the idea.
Well, on one episode, the question for the ladies was: "What's the strangest place you've ever made whoopee?" (This was back in the '70s, you couldn't say "made love" or "had sex" on TV, so they would say "whoopee.") They were going for answers like "the kitchen table," or "the movie theater."
They got to one woman and she answers, "In the butt."
Hilarity ensued.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (Not Safe For Work) -
Experience is just as important as funding
I'm not so sure that funding is the sole source of ESA's woes. Of course, when you're only budgeting 1/30th the amount as your competitors, things aren't always going to work out.
But consider the fact that ESA was founded in 1975 (May 30, 1975, to be exact. We're almost at the anniversary...) By this time, the USA had already tested numerous rockets, put men into space, and had landed men on the moon six years prior. The orbiter was already in development and the first "space shuttle" would be deployed less than a year later.
ESA has a lot of catching up to do, even now. I don't doubt that NASA and ESA share a lot of data, but for the time being, NASA has a great deal of experience over any competing space agency. Funding is not the only problem that ESA will have to overcome before it can be seen as NASA's contemporary.
--
Rate Naked People (Not work-safe) -
Re:Lemme guess
The password they used to get access to the crown jewels was ciscokid
Are you sure it wasn't mafiaboy?
--
Free Naked Pictures -
Re:FREE NAKED PICTURES! POST YOUR OWN!
this is the best one.
-
Re:Secure ?
Forgive my ignorance, but if the code is truly solid code, without buffer overruns and the like, shouldnt this theoretically not matter (just as the code for stuff like ipfw is open)?
I presume that by ipfw, you're speaking of the BSD IP firewall. In which case, yes, you're right, Cisco's IOS does a bit more in terms of advanced processing.
Having had a look at some of the source code, I'm generally impressed. Cisco's code is solid. It's perhaps a bit more simplified than what you'll see in BSD's ipfw source, but simpler is better when you're talking about mission-critical applications. IOS is responsible for switching packets on a fair amount of heavy links; ipfw is responsible for switching packets at your average LAN.
I don't think the IOS leak is going to lead to any new vulnerabilities. Cisco produces solid code. The only real interesting thing we may see is backdoor-style commands to IOS that the public is not aware of.
--
Free Naked Pics -
Without Cisco IOS..
Nobody would be able to see FREE NAKED PICTURES on the intarweb!
-
FREE NAKED PICTURES! POST YOUR OWN!
You can rate naked pictures at FuckMeter. Also you should submit your own nude photo for rating. You know you want to!
NAKED PICTURES FOR FREE! what could be better? -
FREE NAKED PICTURES! POST YOUR OWN!
You can rate naked pictures at FuckMeter. Also you should submit your own nude photo for rating. You know you want to!
NAKED PICTURES FOR FREE! what could be better? -
Pictures of Naked People
You can rate naked pictures at FuckMeter. Also you should submit your own nude photo for rating. You know you want to!
NAKED PICTURES FOR FREE! what could be better? -
Pictures of Naked People
You can rate naked pictures at FuckMeter. Also you should submit your own nude photo for rating. You know you want to!
NAKED PICTURES FOR FREE! what could be better? -
Re:Country Store vs. Apple Store?
When Apple first announced they would open stores nationwide, people pointed to the then already declining Gateway Country Store profitability and said "Jobs, what are you thinking?"
It may not be a rhetorical question, but it's not really a valid one either IMO, as it compares Apples to Orang^WGateways.
But there is an obvious difference between the two retail stores. What are the core differences and how could things turn around Gateway or Apple's currernt trends?
Apple's stores are always going to do better, in terms of revenue, than Gateway's stores. Why? Because - assuming there's one of either store located near you - you can buy a PC anywhere. At Gateway's store, at Best Buy, at CompUSA, hell, you can even buy a PC at Wally-Mart. It might not be a Gateway (and, in fact it might), but it's a PC, and it can run Windows, and that's all most people care about. You can get them everywhere.
You can't, on the other hand, just walk into any ol' store and buy a Mac. My local Best Buy doesn't sell Macs. Neither does my local CompUSA. And neither do any of the (far too freakin' many) local WallyMarts. To the best of my knowledge, the only local store where I can walk in and buy a Mac, is the local Apple store.
People who want Macs have to get them from a) an Apple store, b) online, or c) an authorized Apple retailer. In general, markets who have an Apple store do not have many (if any) authorized Apple retailers, for reasons you can probably imagine. Markets with no Apple store generally have 2 local Apple authorized retailers.
This is why the Apple stores will always do better than the Gateway stores - they're filling a demand which can't be met, in brick-and-mortar terms, elsewhere.
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter! Free pr0n Friday! -
Re:Argh Gateway
I'm not sure I get the general Gateway-hate among geeks. I have 5 computers here, one of them is a Gateway Pentium III 600. I've never had any problems with it whatsoever.
It came with Win98, which ran fine on the machine. Eventually I "upgraded" to WinME, which ran fine (at least as best as can be expected from WinME) on the machine. Now it runs Win2K, which runs fine on the machine. Everything aside from the OS is still factory. And while I've wiped the drive to upgrade Windows a few times, there's never been any trouble aside from the usual "Windows has been installed for 2 years, and it's getting slow as hell" that happens on any machine.
My only possible complaint is that the hard drive has gotten loud, when that thing's spinning, it's hard to think in the same room. I don't consider that Gateway's fault, though, as I've seen the same thing happen with countless drives.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! Free pr0n for the masses. -
Re:I wonder
Sophos has Graham Cluley, and that's all that matters. For those who don't know, Graham Cluley has been a long-time antivirus researcher, and was often teased in viruses written by the female virus/worm author Gigabyte, who was arrested last week.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (Not work-safe, but hey, it's Sunday) -
You'll get NO viruses
No viruses at all when you browse FREE PORN ! What more do you want?
Rate naked people at FUCK METER !! Rate naked pics of other people or submit your own PEN15 to be rated by everyone else...
(NOT work-safe, but if you're at work on Sunday morning, you should be able to browse whatever the hell you want!) -
You'll get NO viruses
No viruses at all when you browse FREE PORN ! What more do you want?
Rate naked people at FUCK METER !! Rate naked pics of other people or submit your own PEN15 to be rated by everyone else...
(NOT work-safe, but if you're at work on Sunday morning, you should be able to browse whatever the hell you want!) -
Pixel for Pixel Porn
FREE PORN ! What more do you want?
NAKED PEOPLE! What more do you want?
Rate naked people at FUCK METER !! Rate naked pics of other people or submit your own PEN15 to be rated by everyone else...
(NOT work-safe, but if you're at work on Sunday morning, you should be able to browse whatever the hell you want!) -
Pixel for Pixel Porn
FREE PORN ! What more do you want?
NAKED PEOPLE! What more do you want?
Rate naked people at FUCK METER !! Rate naked pics of other people or submit your own PEN15 to be rated by everyone else...
(NOT work-safe, but if you're at work on Sunday morning, you should be able to browse whatever the hell you want!) -
Pixel for Pixel Porn
FREE PORN ! What more do you want?
NAKED PEOPLE! What more do you want?
Rate naked people at FUCK METER !! Rate naked pics of other people or submit your own PEN15 to be rated by everyone else...
(NOT work-safe, but if you're at work on Sunday morning, you should be able to browse whatever the hell you want!) -
Is your boss around?
"I'm sitting at work, bored out of my fucking skull, and there's nothing but CRAP on the front page."
Is your boss around? If not, you could always...
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (Not work-safe [unless your boss likes pr0n as much as you do]) -
Re:contractions aren't logical either
How about when law firms and accounting firms just string together the senior partner's names? Ernst, Young, Jacoby and Myers anyone?
No, but I was always partial to the law firm of Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe...
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (Not work-safe [unless your boss is one swingin' jive turkey]) -
Re:omg...
...thats 9 class c networks only for sending spa^H^H^Hmail
So, AOL is big. Really big. Try a `dig mx aol.com` and you'll see that they have their public-facing mail servers scattered across several pieces of netspace. That isn't a bad thing at all, especially if you're looking for the redundancy that an entity with as many customers as AOL needs to have. If half of the internet goes dark, AOLers will still be able to get spam from the other half.
9 /24s is (we'll ignore .0 and .255) 2286 routable addresses. While I doubt that all of those IPs are pointed at mail servers, it honestly wouldn't surprise me if AOL does have 2000+ mail servers sitting around somewhere doing nothing but filtering out 500 billion spams per year. I imagine processing that many emails - not to mention the legit ones - takes a lot of CPU time.
Some early morning math, which may be incorrect for that reason, suggests that 500 billion emails over the course of a year averages out to ((500,000,000,000 / 365) / 86400) = about 16,000 emails per second! And that's just the spam. Isn't it generally accepted that running Google takes 1000+ servers? If so, is it that much of a stretch to think that running AOL's massive mail ops takes 2000+ servers? I wonder if Google gets 16,000 hits per second...
They apparently haven't included any of their dialup space in the SPF record (nor should they have). 9 /24s is nothing to worry about.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (Not work-safe..but click anyway, it's Friday!) -
Re:This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!!
My girlfriend called me nuts.
Be careful, mate. The last time me girlfriend called me nuts, me nuts forgot to answer. Then I didn't have a girlfriend anymore :(
--
Rate Naked People (not work-safe) -
Re:how come
This question comes up frequently with the whole moon landing skeptic/debunk arguments. In addition to Ada_Rules' comment, keep in mind that Mars' atmosphere is quite different from that of the Earth. The differences in atmospheric density, levels of sunlight, and the effects of those things on the refraction of light make for "distorted" images as viewed by eyes trained to see in Earth-perspective.
Or, in layman's terms, "Objects on Mars may be further away than they appear."
--
Rate Naked People (not work-safe) -
Re:Names
Therefore I suggest that the next probes are named things like: "dismal faliure" or "flaming wreck"...
Well if we name the next one PATRIOT (Planetary Adventure Tamed by Realistic Interplanetary Objective Trajectory), it's sure to succeed! And if it fails, we can just blame the TERRestrial ORbital Infidel Space Thugs (TERRORISTs).
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter (not work-safe) -
Oh, just great...
Now the forests are going to be polluted with non-indigenous directory trees!
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter (not work-safe) -
Internet? In Utah?
Wireless guru Rob Flickenger details the known records for Wi-Fi link distances on his latest blog.
In other news, it was determined that Rob Flickenger's blog is the only internet content generated in Utah (unless you count the "Tech Support Hell" stories from all the call centers in Ogden).
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter (Not work-safe [unless your boss likes porn]) -
First NAKED PEOPLE post
-
Ah, the dialup days...
I remember sitting eagerly in front of my 386, waiting for a single GIF from the adult door of the BBS to download at 1200bps. Then it always turned out to be something crappy that I wasted 5 minutes to download. Porn in those days was so difficult!
That damn callback verification feature always woke up my mom in the middle of the night when I was cruising the BBS's for porn... Thank god for these "always on" connections!
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! Not work safe (unless your boss likes pr0n) -
Re:Isn't this very easy to combat?
Why would anyone want to "combat" it?
Because:
a) Running a DNS server takes RAM and drive space. Preferably a whole lot of the former.
b) Name servers are designed to cache. When you get beyond NS/SOA/A/MX, it starts getting heavy.
c) End-users always find a way to push a nameserver to its limits by doing weird things. (Example: I don't know what an AXFR of MIT.EDU's zone would look like, but I have had a user gethostbyaddr() on the entire 18/8, so I can tell you it would probably be huge.)
d) Running a DNS server _successfully_ requires a delicate balance between RAM and drivespace, and high hopes that d) does not happen very often.
Now suppose some goober puts up torrentdns.com, and his zone contains tens of thousands of TXT records, each pointing to (or decoding into) .torrent files.
Why is it a bad idea? Same as if Google or Yahoo decided to set their TTL to 1 minute. It might be cute but it's just not wise.
--
Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! (not work safe) -
I'm not all that surprised
Some term them as vanity sites, and others are scared of privacy concerns.
Can you blame them? Now that people are getting fired over what they post in their blogs, I'd say that has a bit of a "chilling effect" on the topics many would be willing to discuss on their personal homepages. Or what about having a coworker discover your personal site, only to discern that you're [insert something the boss doesn't like]? If you can't talk about work, or if you're afraid of being fired when a coworker surfs by... Why bother with a homepage or blog at all?
I don't know about you, but work is a large part of my life. Seems that the corporate control of the net has kicked in once again...
--
Rate Naked People (Not work-safe) -
Naked people everywhere
Tons of naked pics free at FuckMeter ! Geeks rejoice! Free naked people!
-
Re:User experience
I'm sorry, but someone who owns a NeXT Station cannot possibly own a sexier computer, unless he also has a hexagonal, liquid-cooled couch in his basement.
Hey, I live in my (parents') basement, you insensitive clod! And just so you know, Natalie is currently sound asleep on my hexagonal, liquid-cooled couch. Alas, there are no hot grits, as this puppy dissipates heat like nobody's business.
On the bright side, in Soviet Russia, a Beowulf cluster of these couches would be cold enough to make Siberia feel like the 9th circle of Hell!
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe... trick or treat!) -
Re:In college I went through a Mac phase
We Mac users are a happy community, and sometimes I just want to give old Steve Jobs a hand.
I always figured "Open Transport" had a hidden second meaning...
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe, but hey, it's Halloween!) -
Re:Code shouldn't be important!
Also, why isn't the federal government coming out with a standard software framework for voting?
Be careful what you ask for, or Executive Order 192519 may declare Diebold to be the sole contractor for electronic voting software. Or maybe Halliburton would like to expand its service roster to include "trustworthy software development" ;)
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter! (not work-safe) -
Re:Don't you get protections with a licensed produ
So if you break your jig, or it gets stolen, you can phone up and ask for a replacement.
Try telling that to poor John Bobbitt!
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe) -
Re:Doesn't sound that incredible
australia is at a guess a third the size of here
No, you've got it all wrong. Australia is about the same size as the States, they just have less than a third of the prison population that the US has. Ironic, considering Australia's history and all... [Insert 'use of the word ironic' troll as a reply to this post]
--
Rate Naked People! at FuckMeter (not work-safe) -
Point of origin
Having set off from Darwin
OK, you can stop there. That pretty much explains everything...
--
Rate Naked People! at FuckMeter (not work-safe) -
Solid restrictions
Are there more solid restrictions in the australian race?
Yes, you can't excrete any solids for the duration of the World Solar Car Challenge, or else you're disqualified. That's why 31 hours across Australia is far more impressive than 50 hours from Canada to Mexico... In North America, they were allowed to make pit stops!
--
Rate Naked People! at FuckMeter (not work-safe) -
Broken records
Nuna II crossed the finish line in Adelaide in a new record-breaking time of 30 hours 54 minutes, beating the previous record of 32 hours 39 minutes set by its Dutch precursor Nuna in 2001.
Not to mention, Nuna II broke the previous record of "people who give a shit," increasing the number to 7...
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe) -
Sadly, no longer effective
These days, the best this trick will accomplish is to tie up one of the fax spammer's lines for a few seconds, and that's if anything is even set to answer on ring. Most bulk faxing nowadays
a) is done with computers, not with fax machines, thus there is no paper/toner on the spammer's end to waste
b) is done by someone with enough lines that tying one up won't affect them
Bulk faxes typically come from places who have set up an operation to perform that specific task and then contract their services out to all takers. It's similar to telemarketing, in that someone sets up a fax center (search "broadcast fax" and look for the shady ones) full of computers, modems, and phone lines. Then $COMPANY_A pays the fax center to blast their ad to a certain number of recipients. When you get a fax hawking $PRODUCT_X, it didn't come from the people who are selling that product, they paid someone else to send it.
In the case of most fax spam I've received, very few of them provide a fax number as a point of communication anyway, so figuring out where to try a fax bomb can be time-consuming. The contact point in the majority of my fax spam is generally a URL. (If you've gotten any fax spam, I presume you've gotten the one from some scam operation[s] claiming they'll design your company's website for free, to "gain valuable experience" and/or "train their students," if you agree to pay for a year's worth of webhosting services at some exorbitant price...)
Every now and then, I'll get one that says "To stop receiving these faxes, send a fax with your phone number to ..." followed by a number overseas, which they know damned well nobody is going to pay to call. Typical spammer tactics. I've even received faxes asking me to send a fax saying "Yes" or "No" to some 1-900 number to vote on something or another. Sadly I imagine they probably made a killing from bored office assistant types "voting" on their company's dime.
Oddly enough, even though fax spam has a higher monetary cost than email spam, I tend to Just Hit Delete on the faxes, even though I report a lot of the email spam I get.
An interesting aside: a colleague of mine has a 1-800 number for her fax machine, and never advertises whatever the local ringthrough number is, she only promotes the toll-free number. She has never received a single fax spam. Her theory - and a very interesting one - is that, because owners of toll-free numbers receive bills containing a list of every number who has called them, fax spammers avoid them for fear of being "found."
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter! (not work-safe) -
Hey Joe
More on topic, Joe got a lot of recognition when the "internet got a lot faster". Did he upgrade the firewall? Did he install another OC-3? Maybe he reconfigured services on the proxy?
Hey, Joe,
Where you goin' with that gun in your hand?
Hey Joe, I said where you goin' with that gun in your hand?
Alright, I'm goin' down to shoot my old filesystem,
Caught it messin' around slowin' down the LAN
Yeah, I'm goin' down to shoot my old filesystem,
Caught it messin' around slowin' down the LAN
Hey, Joe, I heard you shot your filesystem down, shot it down
You shot it down to the ground
Yes I did, I shot it, you know I caught it messin' around, drive head went down,
You know I caught my old filesystem's drive head went down,
And I gave it the gun, I shot it!
Hey Joe, I said where you gonna run to now?
I'm gonna run to ReiserFS, way down where my cache runs fast
With apologies to Mr. Hendrix.
--
Rate Naked People! at Fuck Meter (not work-safe) -
Journaling!
Juicy stories like this should be saved for Friday nights.
You mean you're reading Slashdot on Friday nights? Get with the program, man, you're missing out on new technology! Us respectable geeks spend our Friday nights ordering "Cinemax On Demand," it even lets you pause and rewind. Good times for all. ;)
I'll put my JFS (jackable Friday shows) against your JFS (journaling file systems) any day, especially on Friday. I bet journaling file systems don't come with a Flowmaster Hit-The-Ceiling Guarantee...
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe!) -
Re:wtf
JourneyOS? What a dumb name for an OS
Assuming you want to stick with the same genre, maybe you'd rather BostonOS, YesOS, or ChicagoOS? Ah, shit, Chicago is already taken...
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter! (not work-safe) -
fp
-
Re:Needs.
the last Tomb Raider comes to mind (don't ask why I went to see it...)
I don't need to, my good, sir, as I am a fellow geek. The only two words you must utter are "Angelina Jolie." This gives you a free pass in terms of the embarassment factor of seeing Lara Croft II, because:
a) Angelina Jolie has tres jolie boobies
b) Angelina Jolie was Acid Burn in "Hackers"
No further excuse is required. Angelina Jolie is certified Slashdot wet-dream fodder! The only thing that beats Angelina Jolie is Natalie Portman with hot grits down her pants, and $DEITY knows, none of us have ever really seen that.
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe) -
Re:Needs.
I had a caller who borrowed the DSL installation disk from her friend and was trying to install "The Internet" on her DVD player.
Heh. I worked remote support for AOL for nearly 5 years. I kid you not, the following question was far more common than you might imagine:
"When I get email, will my phone ring?"
The first time I saw that question, I laughed. By the tenth time, I'd accumulated the same bit of FAQ-needage that you have. And that question damn sure didn't stop after ten times.
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe) -
Re:The last comment is revealing
This logically implies that unregistered "sex offenders" WILL be picked on every time there is an offence committed, most likely before any serious researching is done.
And I believe that sex offenders are being used as the red herring that they typically are. Imagine when speeders are picked up every time there's an offense committed, or when suspected drug dealers are tracked via RFID/GPS to where they were visiting a suspected "crackhouse," or when [insert potential criminals here] are arraigned just for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Minority Report was a bad movie, but unfortunately, I think it was a good prediction. Just about every crime you can imagine now has a codified "conspiracy to commit $CRIME" law. No longer do you have to actually rob a bank, or murder someone, or kidnap someone; you just have to plan it, and that's enough to toss you in the clink. Soon enough, we'll have people being arrested for crimes they might have eventually committed someday, even if there is no proof of any plan to commit such crimes.
Thoughtcrime is doubleplusungood.
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter (not work-safe) -
Re:JAP isn't back-doored
ATM, the JAP programs's Crime Detection Feature has been removed.
Says who? AN.ON, the same folks who neglected to mention that the Crime Detection Feature was there to begin with (presumably due to German law prohibiting discussion of current proceedings), but readily admitted to it when someone else found it? Or are we to believe the German Federal Office of Criminal Investigation were they to claim that JAP is no longer tracking specific requests?
Suppose that tomorrow it's leaked that PGP Corp. planted a backdoor in the initial release of PGP 8.0 products. PGP Corp. comes out and says, "sorry about that, folks, the feds didn't give us a choice. It's all gone now, we promise!" Would you still trust PGP for anything nontrivial? I wouldn't.
The fact is that JAP is forever tainted, regardless of whether or not anything shady is still taking place. Forks, especially those based somewhere other than Germany, would stand to gain a large userbase.
--
Rate Naked People at Fuck Meter! (not work-safe)