Slashdot Mirror


Where Are The Founders Of The Dial-Up Revolution?

RIMBoy writes "The Atlanta Journal-Constitution recently tracked down the founders behind the dial-up modem revolution. The founders of Hayes Micromodem set the standard with their AT Command set. While Dennis Hayes finds himself inducted into the Computer Industry Hall of Fame, at the same time he is broke (with a stop as a bar owner) and trying to find the next big thing. Dale Heatherington cashed out early and has dedicated himself to several projects, including ham radio."

295 comments

  1. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're waiting patiently for the web to load.

    1. Re:Easy by TowerTwo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having been in this business since about the same time as Hayes, Katz and others you obviously have no idea what the difference between a acoustic coupler modem to, 300 baud, to 1200 baud, to 2400 baud and what we have now meant. Hayes was the standard after acoustic coupler. It defined everything up to 19.2k. When their designed reached the speed where I could not type fast enough to keep up, they changed the world.

      Don't think about the web, think about your keystrokes think about those who saw they could send much more then just text for the first time.
      (Never mind sending a 1 meg file for 60 minutes).

      Tower

    2. Re:Easy by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I think one of the reasons my blood pressure was so high back in college was because I had to wait ten minutes while the two page message of the day scrolled by each time I logged in with my 300bps modem. Boy was I excited when I learned which dotfile to create to not see the motd file!

    3. Re:Easy by drix · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm came bit later than the truely nostalgic crowd, but I do distinctively remember as an 8-year-old my trusty Hayes 1200 baud modem with its distinctive metal case and red LEDs. I think I tried to download 600k Wolf 3D about 7 times over two weeks... frickin' Ymodem-G with no error tolerance whatsoever. I'd leave it downloading when I left for school and my mom picked up the phone every time. Finally someone gave it to me on a floppy... and that was how started learning about virii :)

      Them were the days

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    4. Re:Easy by jpu8086 · · Score: 1

      can you please tell me which dot file it is? i'd be elated with joy if i found out there is actually a way to disable those motd files.

      i am serious. seriously.

      --
      now supporting:
      cmdrTaco for president '04
      michael for oval office intern summer '05
    5. Re:Easy by The+Salamander · · Score: 4, Informative

      man motd
      man login

      touch ~/.hushlogin

    6. Re:Easy by Johnnienumlock5 · · Score: 1

      -1 Redundant Wow.... The entire web on one machine.

      --
      http://www.users.muohio.edu/reamsjp/donate.html
    7. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. I had done "man motd" a long time ago, but it was useless. I suppose I should have followed up with a SEE ALSO "man login"

      Thanks anyway.

    8. Re:Easy by BoomerSooner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Unfortunately you never learned how to spell virus in its plural form.

    9. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, ymodem-g was for when you have v.42 or mnp-4 error correcting connections.

    10. Re:Easy by i81b4u · · Score: 3, Funny

      1200 baud!!??? Back in my day we had to use two sticks and a log to pound out binary code and hope to God that someone on the other end of town heard us! Young wipper snappers.......

    11. Re:Easy by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      I guess the BBS didn't offer ZModem transfer?

      Also think about us who had to surf BBS'es in other countries using International calls. Can you say expensive? LOL! Thank god for a large company with unlimited international calls :)

      My first experience was with acoustic couplers, placing the phone handset into the suction cups after calling on a rotary dial and receiving the 'noise'! ahhh good old days... Did I say Good? By golly, I don't even wanna think about it! These days I get a 2 CD set of the latest moives in a couple of hours :) Naahhh, don't wanna go back to acoustic couplers!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    12. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even better, when I was in school, I learned that they'd left the motd file world writable. A giant ascii picture of Marvin the Martian (Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!) made a much better motd. It only lasted about 12 hours, although it did produce a nice "computer hacker" story in the campus newspaper.

    13. Re:Easy by doogles · · Score: 1

      frickin' Ymodem-G with no error tolerance whatsoever.

      Wasn't the idea behind YModem-G to rely on v.42 to provide the lower-level error detection & correction? Thus, if you didn't have that, you would end up with corrupt transfers all the time?

      This is like 16 years ago now; it's starting to blur.

    14. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      baud != bps.

      300 baud (Bell 103)
      1200bps (Bell 212a or v.22) = 2 bits/baud @600 baud
      2400bps (v.22bis) = 4 bits/baud @600 baud

      Bell was the standard up to 1200bps. Then CCITT. Then the 9600bps wars (US Robotics HST, Telebit, Compucom, etc). Then back to CCITT. Then the 56k wars.

    15. Re:Easy by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      The proper plural of elf is elfs. The proper plural of dwarf is dwarfs. Tolkien thought those two plurals were lame, and used elves and dwarves instead. Thus a new spelling was born. Viruses sounds lame and is clumsy to spell. Welcome to english, our ever evolving language.

    16. Re:Easy by anagama · · Score: 1


      Well, following the "elves/dwarves" example, perhaps it should be "viruzes". This would perhaps put this issue to rest once and for all. Truth is "virii" sounds at least as lame as "viruses" ... more lame actually because it is so incorrect.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    17. Re:Easy by drix · · Score: 1

      It sounds lame because it got coopted by a bunch of script-kiddy lusers. But since I was using it way before all that, I'm grandfathered in, and anyone who doesn't like it can kindly kiss my ass :) 'Viruzes' sounds even worse because it calls forth those idiot preteens on Half Life who insist on pluralizing everything with a 'z', e.g. 'TURN ON UR SOUNDZ, N00B', etc.

      Having said all that, virii is definitely, unquestionably wrong. And having said that, I still don't give a fuck (see above).

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    18. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YModem-G was available prior to v.42 and MNP 2-4. It allowed 300 baud modems to downlaod at an impressive 29 CPS.

    19. Re:Easy by operagost · · Score: 1

      I wish I could travel back through time and introduce you to Zmodem, my friend. Or at least big-blocksize Kermit .... sheesh.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:Easy by anagama · · Score: 1


      hmmm....I don't play video games anymore so I didn't realize the danger of "viruzes". Funny post BTW - I got a kick out of it.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    21. Re:Easy by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --U R teh r00t. TFP. :)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    22. Re:Easy by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      and that was how started learning about virii :)

      Huh, huh... He said virii... ;-)

      Congratulations on the ObLetsAnnoyTheGrammarNazis post of the day.

    23. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The proper plural of elf is elfs. The proper plural of dwarf is dwarfs. Tolkien thought those two plurals were lame, and used elves and dwarves instead. Thus a new spelling was born.
      And the funniest part about that is that when they were typesetting Tolkien's books, and the copyeditors started querying his spelling, they quoted the Oxford English Dictionary - and Tolkien replied along the lines of "Well, I've changed my mind since I wrote the dictionary entry"!
  2. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are working at AOL.

    Blogzine
    Fortress of Insanity

  3. Come to think of it by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where are the founders of the broadband revolution?

    Working in bars, claiming benefits etc. etc.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  4. think about it.... by neo8750 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what would our world be like this technology wouldn't of been explored and helped along the way. i highly doubt the internet would be where it is today let alone any other form of technology.

    1. Re:think about it.... by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      what would our world be like this technology wouldn't of been explored and helped along the way. i highly doubt the internet would be where it is today let alone any other form of technology.

      at one point, the internet was mostly dial up. don't you remember waiting patiently for that uucp script to cron so you could get your email?

    2. Re:think about it.... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      poster wrote:
      what would our world be like this technology wouldn't of been explored and helped along the way. i highly doubt the internet would be where it is today let alone any other form of technology.

      Ah-ha - now we know who to blame!!! Seriously, it didn't have THAT much of an impact on other technologies. Not all technology is internet-related, not even most computer technology. Sheesh~

    3. Re:think about it.... by keester · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Any other form of technology?

      Where would the wheel be without modems? 'Technology' has got to be the ultimate buzz-word.

      Manager: Let's through technology at it.

      Programmer: Can we hit the manager with a hammer? That's throwing technology at the problem as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      Take it easy? I'll take it anyway I can get it . . .
    4. Re:think about it.... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      "...technology wouldn't have been..."

      I hate to be an English nazi here, but if everyone uses "of" instead of "have", soon enough this incorrect form will enter the proper lexicon and at that point, I'll probably pull all my hair out. And the world doesn't need another bald white guy.

    5. Re:think about it.... by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember often not being able to wait and firing off the process by hand...by walking three miles in the snow and liking it!

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  5. Where are they? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Where are the founders of the dial-up revolution? They're still trying to connect with their 2400 baud modems. Be patient, they'll be here and contributing to the conversation by the end of the day, once the carrier screech indicates handshake.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Where are they? by real+gumby · · Score: 3, Informative
      They're still trying to connect with their 2400 baud modems.
      Err, cute joke, but old modems were 110 baud (also speed of a teletype, i.e. TTY). Later 300 became popular, but really took off (so to speak) with 1200 baud. I think Hays' first modem was 300 baud.

      I also remember using "split" modems which were asymmetric -- 1200 downstream and IIRC 150 upstream -- which prefigure today's ADSL.

    2. Re:Where are they? by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative
      also speed of a teletype, i.e. TTY
      The original TTYs were 50 baud. TDD (Telecomunication Device for the Deaf) uses that standard even today. It's pretty easy to type too fast for them to keep up (but modern hardware has a buffer to help keep from losing characters.)
      with 1200 baud
      Actually, it's not 1200 baud. It's 600 baud, but 1200 bps (bits per second.) Baud and bps do not mean the same thing -- it's bps that you're thinking of.
    3. Re:Where are they? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      According to the manual for my wife's tdd, it's actually 48.5 baud.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:Where are they? by jelle · · Score: 1

      "50 baud"

      Hmm. Sure it isn't 50 bits per second instead, using DTMF signals at 12.5baud?

      Ah, here it is, section A.2 in V.18... looks like the 50 baud was FSK: The modulation is frequency shift keyed modulation (i.e. no carrier is present when a character is not being transmitted) using 1 400 Hz for a binary 1 and 1 800 Hz for a binary 0. A bit duration of either 20 or 22.00 0.40 ms is used providing either a nominal data signalling rate of 50 or 45.45 bits/s respectively.

      But V.18 already was the improved TTY... Now what was the original... (google?)... Google says "A 45.45 Baud FSK Modem" is the U.S. standard for Baudot TTY signaling, or A Frequency Shift Keyed Modem for Use
      on the Public Switched Telephone Network. AT&T Relay Service
      and I keep seeing "ITA-2", but no documents...

      This is the best link I found about the subject: Older TDDs (prior to V.22) use 1800 Hz/1400 Hz FSK half-duplex operation with an approximate baud rate of 45.5 in the U.S.A. and 50 in Europe.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  6. well duh by rootofevil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the revolutionaries never make any money. they care too much about their ideas to be hardassed enough to profit. its always the people who come around later that just see a business opportunity.

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    1. Re:well duh by kisrael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the revolutionaries never make any money. they care too much about their ideas to be hardassed enough to profit. its always the people who come around later that just see a business opportunity.

      Yeah, but it's those hardassed people seeing a business opportunity that bring the technology to the masses, away from ivory towers and geek playgrounds. And when you have competition, that's what makes things affordable. That's what capitalism does well. It's not always free from problems, what with monopolies and a shortage of long-term thinking, but it is why I had a 9600 baud modem in 1994 and a direct connection to the whole damn Internet in my study today.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:well duh by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For years and years, Hayes defined modem technology. Far from being "too hardassed to profit", they were too profit-oriented to meet the market. They failed to make their products cheap enough for the home user, so USRobotics and other clonemakers won the modem wars.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    3. Re:well duh by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not always free from problems, what with monopolies and a shortage of long-term thinking, but it is why I had a 9600 baud modem in 1994 and a direct connection to the whole damn Internet in my study today.

      Um. I'd attribute that to legislation. Sure, it might have happened if we didn't regulate telecom the way we do, but... as it happened, it doesn't feel like capitalism to me.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:well duh by taybin · · Score: 2

      If you read the article, you would see that both creators of the AT command set made a lot of money. One is still rich, and the other lost his fortune.

    5. Re:well duh by ccp · · Score: 2, Funny

      the revolutionaries never make any money. they care too much about their ideas to be hardassed enough to profit. its always the people who come around later that just see a business opportunity.

      No, if they refuse a 140 million offer they certainly don't.

      Cheers,

    6. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was that quote?

      "The most successful innovators are the creative imitators, the number two." - dunna

    7. Re:well duh by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      USR was hardly the low price point...

      now, the sportster, or the supra's... those were the cheap ones...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    8. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Peter F. Drucker

      Best words of wisdom ever!

    9. Re:well duh by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      You do know the Sportster was a US Robotics modem?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:well duh by swb · · Score: 1

      I think you're right, and I also think that revolutionaries are willing to sacrifice monopoly exclusionary behavior in the name of adoption or openness, which seems to be critical at getting new technology going. You can introduce a new monopoly technology, but you need a monopoly to introduce it into (eg, Win2k for Win98).

    11. Re:well duh by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      USR was hardly the low price point...

      "Get your Zoom 1200 bps speed burner! Fully Hayes compatible!*"



      * Compatibility claims subject to change without notice.
      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    12. Re:well duh by phaze3000 · · Score: 1
      Rubbish.

      Che Guevara is the most famous revolutionary of them all, and he made millions of Pesos!

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  7. If I had a nickle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    for everyone who is broke after doing net related buisness, I wouldn't be broke.

    1. Re:If I had a nickle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a business plan to me. When's the IPO?

      How many buzzwords can you pack into your marketing material?

    2. Re:If I had a nickle... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Well, you'd have to sell all those nickles to an aviary or something. *Then* you wouldn't be broke.

      Unless of course you meant "nickel".

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    3. Re:If I had a nickle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nickle

      Notice how "nickle" is defined as the five-cent piece second, right after the bird definition?
      You may prefer "nickel", but "nickle" is still denotatively correct, and, IMHO, the preferred pronunciation.

  8. sounds kinda sad by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    at least at first, but then we remember stories like this one and realize maybe it ain't as bad as it could be.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:sounds kinda sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why does that story not have any -1 posts - is it that old?

  9. I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by swb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'd love $20M over 10 years. I'd quit, too, and go do something more personally rewarding.

    But some people are the Hayes and can't imagine what they'd do if they weren't doing what they're doing.

    Not me, $20M and out sounds good to me.

    1. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by danny256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its ironic that people who have the motivation and ambition to earn $20 million will probably not stop there, but people who would stop at $20 million will never earn that much.

    2. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Its ironic that people who have the motivation and ambition to earn $20 million will probably not stop there, but people who would stop at $20 million will never earn that much.

      In other words, the rich keep doing what made them rich, the poor keep doing what made them poor.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by fafaforza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that people who would stop at a certain level, and instead focus on activities rewarding in other ways than money are the more frugal and humble ones. The ones you never read about in Forbes, or watch on tv. The ones that never see a limit are the money-, power-hungry and attention-starved monsters that will do anything to prove they are better than you.

    4. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I think that if you worked hard for it, you either would get used to the life (spend more because you can) or you would change your life than from where you are now (cashing out means a drastic change lifestyles).

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine exactly what I'd do. I'd learn to sail, buy myself a big-ass catamaran, and sail the world until I'm too old to haul the lines.

    6. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine exactly what I'd do. I'd learn to sail, buy myself a big-ass catamaran, and sail the world until I'm too old to haul the lines.

      Good idea, except for the pirates. It's kind of depressing how people from far away lands in strange waters miles away from any peace keepers tend to misbehave.

    7. Re:I'm more Heatherington than Hayes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I once knew a (much older) friend who ran a small software and consulting shop. It was the coolest shop I'd ever seen in my life; it served the UNIX market back in the 1980's whe few folks had heard of UNIX. The team he'd assembled could best be described as almost a fraternity in the way that they actually got along with each other and worked together cooperatively rather than competitively climbing over each other to get ahead. It was even a point of pride that he mentioned to me on multiple occasions, and I thought it was great that in an age where so many people seemed focused on hitting numbers (yes, even back then, 15 years ago), someone would prefer to crow about the quality of his team than of the number of zeros on his company's balance sheet.

      I stood by as his shop, which had been subcontracting to my employer under a non-compete for a while, grabbed my employer's just-about-only contract out from under them. I could have helped my employer fight it, and in fact some of the client's staff who didn't like the ethics of the deal wanted me to do so and thought I (alone) was uniquely in a position to do it due to having inside information about how the deal went down from my friend's side and from the client's side (thanks to the trust of friends) that no one else possessed. Instead, I opted to "help out" my friend and honor everyone's confidences by staying silent. It was a damned-if-I-did, damned-if-I-didn't situaton, and to this day I wish I hadn't been in it, because neither choice was really on a moral high ground. For not acting in my employer's best interests by telling them about the pending contract loss months in advance, when it had first been mentioned to me in confidence, I received a layoff notice on my 28th birthday, six days before Christmas, 1990.

      Word to the wise: before you "help" someone... THINK IT THROUGH, and determine whether you really ARE helping them or not.

      In retrospect, it's one of the less intelligent things I've ever done... because in the process of becoming a "big, successful corporate shop" kind of place, it seemed to lose a lot of its magic and its early cool (and talented) staff (who left because it just wasn't the same), and the friend I'd admired for so many years for any number of reasons became EXTREMELY financially successful (he'd already had his first million before this, I think) and it went to his head -- enough so that he eventually lost the gravy train contract that had bootstrapped him into the big leagues, with the client complaining (to me, by now working for the client as a contractor) about the rates he was charging for interns and recent college grads. (Yes, typical consulting strategy here.) No matter... he poured all that $$$ and staff into Microsoft technology, struck up a few friendships with very-higher-ups at MS, and today his company wins some award or another from Microsoft every couple years. The main stories I've heard from mutual acquaintances about him any time recently are less about cool technology and more about how one of his kids had bragged about never wearing the same dress to work twice.

      In trying to help an organization I so valued... I inadvertently aided in morphing it away from that, into something else entirely that while financially successful, didn't quite have the same geek cool factor and camaraderie (though it has never been THAT much bigger staff-wise than it was when I first ran into it). What I regret most, though, is that I unwittingly played a small part in morphing my friend into someone just another tech industry guy with primarily financial motivations and goals, because he's the kind of guy who can have an amazingly positive impact on people's lives when he cares about doing so. And I think the world needs more people who care about doing so, not fewer.

      To top it off, it was the beginning of a recession, and I was unemployed (cough, GRAD STUDENT, cough... yeah, that's right.....) for the next year. My successful friend who hired as many people as my employer let go? Much to

  10. Too bad about these guys.... by overbyj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Certainly, hooking up on a modem was one of the things that made my computer cool compared to other people that didn't have one. Those were the days when you would dial up some BB and hear EEEEE aaaaaa iiiii shhhhhh oooo bong bong bing (you get the point....)

    I remember cruising along with my 1200 baud modem why others were stuck with 300 baud! Too bad that these guys are now out in the cold (figuratively speaking, though maybe for some, literally) because it was modems that people used to first connect to the internet, not DSL or cable. Modems unfortunately will become nothing more than a tale that we can tell our grandkids about many years from now.

    "Back in my day, we didn't have these fancy wireless petabit connections. We had to use 300 baud modems over the telephone (uphill, both ways by the way!) and we liked it!"

    --
    No trees were harmed in the composition of this; however, numerous electrons were inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by billimad · · Score: 1

      I remember cruising along with my 1200 baud modem

      Lemme see here. You were in a car, with a modem, looking for chicks?

    2. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! mod him upppppppp!

    3. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in 1993 I ran a BBS here in Nanaimo (there was about 30 of them here at the time), and the other BBS operators kept telling me I should ban people with less than a 2400 Baud modem. As far as I was concerned, everyone got 45 minutes; It made no difference to me how many bits they could pull in that time.

    4. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those were the days when you would dial up some BB and hear EEEEE aaaaaa iiiii shhhhhh oooo bong bong bing (you get the point....)

      Ah, but if you concentrate you'll remember that before 56k (or maybe 28.8) modems, it didn't do the boing boing noise at the end. It ended with the static sshhhhhhh, (and maybe had a short even "aeaea" tone or two over the static), and then cut out. The boing boing sound was a shocking late development in modem handshaking art.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      As someone who has spent a lot of time the last three years (as a job) listening to this stuff - amazing what you can learn just by listening - I believe the bong bing bong is specificly V.92.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    6. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      Weren't you? I remember driving along, my 9600 USRobotics Sportster strapped into my Toyota Corolla, and the girlies would gather round and ooh and ahh and want to pet it. Total chick magnet. ... until I sobered up anyway...

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    7. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      It sucks having to explain to people running credit card processing software why bank modems are all 1200 or 2400 bps. 56kbps may be faster for sending a 140 byte message, but not when you spend 20 seconds listening to the stupid thing bong-bong back and forth trying to decide on a protocol and speed.

      In fact, so few modem makers even care to test their equipment at 1200 bps that we collected old Smartmodem 1200 and 2400 modems to send out to people who couldn't find a decent 'slow' modem.

    8. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Modems unfortunately will become nothing more than a tale that we can tell our grandkids about many years from now.
      My grandkids will still be using modems if Broadband in Australia doesn't get its arse into gear.
    9. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by nusuth · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it was after introduction of the 56k modems. I don't remember hearing it before also 56k modems don't bonk when they connect other home dial-up modems either (since the connection is limited to 33.6 downstream too in that case.)

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    10. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      Modems unfortunately will become nothing more than a tale that we can tell our grandkids about many years from now.

      No, our grandkids will know. Because we'll still be hearing that damn sound on every radio and TV ad having *anything* to do with technology for the next millennium.

    11. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by ibmman85 · · Score: 0

      hmm i dont remember the boin boing sound.. i guess ill have to dig out my modems and test it someday.. before 14.4 modems i think the slowest i connected with was the built in modem in my toshiba T1200XE.. great great laptop still works too except the hard drive now makes some interesting sounds...

    12. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why I never heard it. The fastest modem I've ever used is the V.90 in the laptop.

    13. Re:Too bad about these guys.... by dknj · · Score: 1

      But.. could you connect to a remote modem using your voice? I was able to connect to other modems at 14.4k but could only have remote modems connect to me at 2400 baud. Yea, I was a geek when I was a kid...

      -dk

  11. 56K limit... by dameron · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why 56k seems to be the limit on dialup speeds. I remember a good deal of speed ramping in the late 80s early 90s having used everything from a 300 baud KayPro modem to 1200 baud, 2400, 9600, 14.4, 28.8 and 56k but then nothing much since then. Diamond MM had a "shotgun" modem with two 56k connections, but that wasn't practical.

    So, if anyone knows, why 56k and not more, and is there any research into anything beyond 56K for dialup?

    -dameron

    1. Re:56K limit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DSL is the next generation on the phone lines. And it doesn't tie up the phone line like a modem. Unfortunately, in my area, its over $50 per month for 128k. Damn phone company market monopolies.

    2. Re:56K limit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you would actually read what is written on the side of a US Robotics modem box you would see that the FCC limits the actual limit to 53K.

    3. Re:56K limit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As I understand it 56K (or actually 53K) is the max transmission limit imposed by the FCC in the US. I seem to recall some fear about damaging the POTS infrastructure or something along those lines - not sure if I remember the rationale properly.

    4. Re:56K limit... by cwernli · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't bet my head on this, but I do recall having heard that it has to do with the sound-spectrum being able to transport over the phone.

      If I'm not entirely wrong it goes something like this: human-perceptible sounds allow for 33.6k connections, then someone figured out that out-of-band sounds can be used, hence 56k.

      It definitely looks like a physical limit - there are only so-and-so many different sounds transmittable over POTS.

    5. Re:56K limit... by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because that's all the bandwidth there is.

      Most calls get digitized by the phone company, and the 53K modems take that into account to get almost all of the theoretical bandwidth. I know someone will correct me, but I think that most phone calls are digitized as 64Kb data streams. There may be some overhead in that, lowering the theoretical maximum throughput.

      Of course, if all the phone companies upgraded their equipment to some different standard, they could probably support significantly higher data rates. But then again, isn't that called DSL?

    6. Re:56K limit... by mdmarkus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Between the Central Offices, the connections are digital and multiplexed. The amount dedicated to each channel is 64k with 8k used for switching information. So while it's possible to run better than 56k over a phone line pair (DSL does it at least for limited distances), once you hit the CO, the 56k limit comes into play.

    7. Re:56K limit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because modern POTS uses 64 kb/s digital lines to route your phone calls. So 64 kb/s is an upper limit, and then there is some loss due to the digital-analog conversions.

    8. Re:56K limit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      I know someone will correct me, but I think that most phone calls are digitized as 64Kb data streams.

      You asked for it ... ;)

      In the US the phone lines are digitized with 8000 Hz and 7 bits, resulting in a bandwidth of 56 kbps. In Europe 8 bits are used, giving 64 kbps. I can't remember off-hand what Japan uses (they mix happily european and US standards )

      So you can't go above 56k and hope to sell your modems in the US, thus losing at least half of your potential customers. It's just not theoretically possible.

    9. Re:56K limit... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Some of it is because of the sample limit of the equipment at the other end of the copper, which I think is around 64kbps. ISDN gets around this simply by bypassing the analog stages. Now it is DSL on the other end of said wire which makes it really the next generation "telephone modem" although neither ISDN nor DSL really seem to have any analog component.

      I really don't think that is relevant because so few really saw much more than 33.6k

    10. Re:56K limit... by RobKow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference is that US lines tend to use in-band signaling and get 24 lines to a DS1 whereas Europe tends to use ISDN which gets 23 lines to a DS1 with a separate line for signaling (call setup/takedown, dialing, etc.).

      So the maximum usable bandwidth of the lines in the US is 56k with the degredation from the in-band signaling (which may account for the high bit).

    11. Re:56K limit... by eyeball · · Score: 1

      Of course, if all the phone companies upgraded their equipment to some different standard, they could probably support significantly higher data rates. But then again, isn't that called DSL?

      I don't want to start some flame war, but telcos can't simply upgrade equipment to get higher bandwidth from pots lines. The entire phone system is based on these 64kbit blocks, which are time division channels that make up T1-T3 (and higher) circuits. It would be more a matter of rewriting telco standards that date back many centuries, and getting *all* national and international phone companies to coordinate adoption. Could you imagine? Easier to create a new technology like xDSL from scratch.

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    12. Re:56K limit... by billimad · · Score: 1

      some good information here.

      however, i understood it that the theoretical maximum for an analog phone line is 64kbps (8khz sampling rate, 8bit ulaw encoded samples).

    13. Re:56K limit... by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      Exactly... Drop 1 bit to the A/D and D/A converters, so you get 56K max. (8khz sampling rate, 7 valid data bits). Going through multiple A/Ds and D/As will get you an even worse rate. I've seen 16 bit linear codecs that can keep the 56K rate going though multiple A/D and D/A converters...

    14. Re:56K limit... by billimad · · Score: 1

      why do you drop the bit? is this because of fcc regulation of 53k?

    15. Re:56K limit... by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      It is usually meaningless (or inaccurate). The least significant bit has a 50-50 chance of being wrong due to line noise. ie, it's hard to tell if the signal is above or below the threshold of the codec to determine if the lsb should be a 0 or a 1.

    16. Re:56K limit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to nit pick (but i will anyway *grin*) ...a matter of rewriting telco standards that date back many centuries...

      Many centuries?!? like more than one? so what what were the telco standards like in 1803?

    17. Re:56K limit... by Animats · · Score: 1
      Suprisingly, that's not how it works any more.

      Today, when you call a number that's a dial-up of a a major ISP, what usually happens is that the telco finds out via SS7 that the destination is a modem. The call is then routed to a local point of presence, converted to IP, and shipped over the Internet to the destination. The point of presence need not be owned by the ISP; it's often a shared facility owned by a telco. This is called a virtual point of presence. This is a service ISPs can buy from telcos if they want "local dial up numbers" all over the country.

      The logical next step would be to push this technology were pushed out to end offices, which would allow have customer line terminations that allowed higher bandwidths than 56K if the analog local loop supported it.

      DSL already does that job better, so there's no reason to do this. Telcos would prefer that DSL worked like virtual points of presence, so they could have "call charges", but fortunately, that didn't happen. Telcos keep trying to put "dial up" features into DSL, but nobody goes for it.

    18. Re:56K limit... by lxs · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent is using internet time.

      I wonder how much it is in dog-years...

  12. Ah, the dialup days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember sitting eagerly in front of my 386, waiting for a single GIF from the adult door of the BBS to download at 1200bps. Then it always turned out to be something crappy that I wasted 5 minutes to download. Porn in those days was so difficult!

    That damn callback verification feature always woke up my mom in the middle of the night when I was cruising the BBS's for porn... Thank god for these "always on" connections!

    --
    Rate Naked People at FuckMeter! Not work safe (unless your boss likes pr0n)

    1. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you think that broadband has contributed to peoples attention spans becoming shorter? Because, now that pages load faster than I can click, I get annoyed more quickly if a page takes slightly longer to load. I'm tutting if Google isn't there in 1 second, and clicking again, and again, to punish it for its....
      I'm bored now.

    2. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by cfuse · · Score: 1

      Do you think that broadband has contributed to peoples attention spans becoming shor ... Click.

    3. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by escher · · Score: 1

      Because, now that pages load faster than I can click, I get annoyed more quickly if a page takes slightly longer to load.

      This is where tabbed browsing comes in handy. I have the middle mouse button set for "open in new tab" and have Mozilla set to load new tabs in the background.

      I just middle-click my way through a page and by the time I'm done with that the first few tabs have loaded. When I'm done reading those the next few have loaded. I rarely ever have to just sit there and wait for a page to load anymore! Slashdot, Fark, and Google News have become far more fun since I started browsing in this manner.

    4. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by stevezero · · Score: 1

      What? Oh....uhm, did you say something? Let's go ride our bikes!

    5. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by MrWa · · Score: 1
      I realize you got modded as funny, but probably not for the reason it really is funny:

      My attention is on pause when the page is loading - the actual content isn't ready yet and I am impatiently awaiting the moment I can actually pay attention to something. The attention span issue is more relevant when discussing television because of the move towards soundbites, blurbs, and shorter (with less content) programming. This may manifest itself on the web by people browsing more erratically and quickly through content. This was probably compounded by the long load times: no one wanted to wait for huge content, when the relative worth isn't known until after the load is done.

      What broadband has done, for me atleast, is make the idea of checking email, looking up some tidbit of information, or refreshing /. once more not a big deal. That is what makes BB so useful - it is no longer a decision of "do I want to wait to download my email or go watch the grass grow." I can quickly and effortlessly get the work I want to do done and move onto other things, without the added hassle of connecting and waiting for what seems like a long time. The wait is bad only because it is just that: waiting.

    6. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I can remember the Bad Old Days of 14.4 modems and even 2400s. I would keep about half a dozen Lego pieces by the computer so that I'd have something to do while waiting for downloads. Multitasking was a no-no on the 286 running DOS 5.0 while even the P-90 running WfW was a little flakey, but then again I usually got out of Windows and used a DOS program for dialling up the BBSes anyway.

      Nowadays I still wait as long since I'm downloading bigger things. But at least I can play Solitaire while waiting. Heck, I can even open a new browser tab! That, and the porn looks a heck of a lot better now that I'm no longer using EGA...

    7. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      Same here--I use Firebird, which opens tabs in the background by default. It's awesome--I can cruise Slashdot and open all the articles I wanna read, then open links, etc.

      And Firebird (maybe Mozilla too, I'm too lazy to check) has a feature where you can save/load multiple tabs as a single bookmark.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    8. Re:Ah, the dialup days... by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I remember doing the same thing on a 300bps vicmodem. Except you got maybe 4 colors at a 320x200 resolution. I cut my teeth on that stuff. I also remember saving all my babysitting money so I could upgrade to 1200bps, and I also remember the amazement when I was able to dial up from my C64 to my friend's 8088 machine. Good times, good times.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  13. Funny how these people go in pairs... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just look at:

    1. Hayes: Dennis Hayes stays with company, guy who did the technical work, Dale Heatherington, leaves
    2. Microsoft: Bill Gates stays with company, guy who did the techincal work, Paul Allen, leaves
    3. Apple: Steve Jobs stays with the company, guy who did the techincal work, Steve Wozniak, leaves

    So seems like techies have all the fun: start a company, keep a low profile, get rich, and then quit. That way the techie gets to spend the rest of their lives with enough money to just hack!

    Sweet.

    The story was meant to be a sad reflection on Hayes-the-man, ended up making me feel good about being a geek.

    John.

    1. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That pattern is credible. Coders and designer tech guys see the world in terms of a 'project'. A project has a lifecycle, and lifespan. Once you have completed it, you get bored. Or make yourself redundant - which means your work is done and you did it properly. Every programmers purest aim is to make himself obsolete.

      Running a business is an ongoing long term project so its usually just after test/integration that the designer often gets bored and the dudes part company.

      The established company can then hire younger programmers while the original creative force goes on to his next project.

      Businessman and Hackers are a different breed (not species) they work on different levels of abstraction and different timescales. Now and again they come together for mutal good and kick off something really worthwhile.

    2. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > The story was meant to be a sad reflection on Hayes-the-man, ended up making me feel good about being a geek.

      Hear, hear.

      Don't get me wrong, they're both hackers, and I'd be honored to buy either of 'em a beer. But the most inspirational thing of that article was seeing that Heatherington didn't just get out with the cash -- but that because he took the money and ran, and lived within his means, he's still hacking hardware for the sheer fun of it.

      Before I grow up, I wanna be like Heatherington.

    3. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Agreed. Heatherington has now become my idol:

      While Hayes dreamed of empire, Heatherington dreamed of quitting.

      It's one of life's paradoxes that those who are most able to accumulate lots of $$ are those who are least able to enjoy it. It's nice to find someone who can enjoy it.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    4. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by MsWillow · · Score: 1

      Don't forget a few other notable pairs, like:

      Ward Christenson writes MODEM7 and CBBS, while Randy Suess slings the solder. Ward is forgotten, while Randy starts Chinet, one of Chicago's first publicly-available UNIX systems, complete with e-mail *and* Usenet news :)

      Karl Deninger and Randy Suess - Randy runs Chinet while Karl learns about UNIX on it, then Karl starts his own ISP - MCS.Net.

      I lost track of that whole crowd many moons ago, when I moved away. Haven't heard about any of them, but far as I know, both Chinet and MCS are still alive and kicking.

      --

      Lemon curry?
    5. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The story was meant to be a sad reflection on Hayes-the-man, ended up making me feel good about being a geek.

      Indeed, it is interesting...the comparisons are interesting as well.

      *Gates likes to surround himself with really bright people and good managers. Hayes, according to the article, tried to run everything himself.

      *Jobs was a brillaint visionary all by himself. His problems in his early years stemmed from bullheadedness and personality conflicts. I suspect getting older has tamed him.

      *Hayes would have had a good sum of money if it had not been for two very messy divorces.

      Now he's being raked over the coals in child support (which I suspect was set to a level that reflected his original high net worth.)

      The whole issue with child support is so ugly that I'm coming around to the idea that you would have to be a fool to father children. Get em snipped now, you'll save yourself a lot of hell in the long run.

      That, or I'll start a company that would collect insurance premiums now and protect you from child support payments in the future. That could work.

    6. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >but that because he took the money and ran, and lived within his means, he's still hacking hardware for the sheer fun of it.

      Its not that hard to live within your means with $20 million.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    7. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
      The whole issue with child support is so ugly that I'm coming around to the idea that you would have to be a fool to father children. Get em snipped now, you'll save yourself a lot of hell in the long run.

      Ay-men. It's just YET ANOTHER example of how any attempts to even the odds between those with power and those without do nothing but flip the scenario the long run.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    8. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Its not that hard to live within your means with $20 million.

      No it's not, but it's absolutely amazing how many people can't. Look at virtually any lottery winner, most pop stars, or anyone else who goes from millionaire to zilch.

      If you've got $20M in the bank, your yearly operating budget is a "mere" $1,00,000. Certainly more than enough to live on anywhere in the world, and live very comfortably, but you can't go spending money on anything you want to, and you probably can't afford to own more than 3 homes reasonably.

      Hell, give me $5M and I'd have enough to never work again, but it's all about budgeting. (I could get away with less, but the closer I come to $200k/year the more likely I am to do some work; otherwise it'd be just raising kids, doing random stuff, and traveling).

    9. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by stu72 · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether or not your name is Micheal Jackson:

      http://asia.news.yahoo.com/031126/afp/0311262303 21 people.html

    10. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > >but that because he took the money and ran, and lived within his means, he's still hacking hardware for the sheer fun of it.
      >
      > Its not that hard to live within your means with $20 million.

      Tell that to every lottery jackpot winner, pro athlete, rock star, and dot-commer who "made it big", only to run out of cash within a few years

      For that matter, (and this is the sad part of the article) tell that to Dennis Hayes.

    11. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      What I see here is that in most cases when the suits edge the techs out, the company in question starts to go downhill. The exception might be Microsoft-they've managed to make money even if their products have serious quality and security problems--but that may just be because Microsoft is in a very special niche.

    12. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by taernim · · Score: 1

      Ummm.

      The only pair that fits is Hayes and Heatherington.

      Gates & Jobs are the ones who stayed... and are rich.
      Paul Allen and The Woz left, but also still have a lot of money.

      So... how are they related again?

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    13. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Pretty sad outlook. What the hell is the evolutionary point of existence without being able to father children, and yes, blow some of your wealth on them? No, no, you took away the wrong lesson from this story. The *RIGHT* lesson is to always, and I mean ALWAYS, get a prenuptial agreement, even if you don't think you have enough money to merit it. Learn from the wealthy elite, you'll notice that they always follow this rule (or they get raked over the coals, and end up not among the wealthy elite).


      Anyway, it's never really child support per se that does you in financially - I mean, you had the kid in the first place, presumably that meant you decided you could afford the basic necessities of child care, schooling, etc., and guys who get divorced and try to get out of raising their kids fucking disgust me - that's about as low as it gets, and I've seen some DIRTY FILTHY rich fucks try to get out of caring for their children. It's the alimony and the crazy allocation of wealth that goes on in some divorces that costs you, and can be very unfair.


      You can take my advice or leave it, but no matter how sweet a woman may seem, remember that things may change, people get bitter, and when that happens, they are out for themselves. It's like that tattoo that says "I love Lola" that seemed like a good idea at the time, but costs you dearly to have lasered out 5 years later. Even if it doesn't seem romantic, if you got as far as the proposal part, you need to be mature enough to discuss it and get something drafted up by a lawyer. And remember, if all she wants is half of your net worth in the event of a divorce, maybe you should step back and consult with your friends and family again before you jump into this.

    14. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Razzak · · Score: 1

      If jobs getting a 75million dollar jet makes him poor, I'd like that job.

    15. Re:Funny how these people go in pairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know there are actually men who don't need to pay court ordered child support payments because they volunteer to provide economically for thier offspring. What a concept. Male responsibility. It does exist.

      I hope you have no kids, for their sakes. The last thing this world needs is more fatherless kids.

  14. BBS Documentary by jkeegan · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's been covered on slashdot many times so I'm sure people will remember, but there is a BBS Documentary in the works.

    The history of such revolutions should be documented for future generations to learn from.

    --

    ..Jeff Keegan
    seven syllables explain TiVo: kee gan dot org slash ti vo
    1. Re:BBS Documentary by annielaurie · · Score: 1

      I had the pleasure of sitting down for two hours with Jason Scott while he was in town to interview Dr. Vint Cerf. While I suspect my own interview wasn't particularly interesting, the DVD's will be a "must-have," just because those long-ago days were so important to my own formation.

      I'm glad you pointed this out. Now I'll know when to look for the release.

      Regards,
      Anne

      --
      DUCT TAPE: The Election Supervisors' Secret Weapon
    2. Re:BBS Documentary by Jason+Scott · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks, Jeff.

      Regarding the documentary, I actually had conversations with Dennis Hayes about interviewing him for it, but unfortunately his e-mail changed and I lost the ability to contact him to schedule an interview. If one of those kind folks out who stays in contact with Mr. Hayes could let him know I'm looking for him, perhaps he could mail me.

      167 finished, 30 to go!

      - Jason

  15. Legal, not technical by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Informative

    I remember reading that the 56K limit was legal, not technical (and that this legal limit is actually something like 53K:

    "In the U.S., the FCC places a power ceiling on phone lines of -12dbm average per 3 second interval. X2 modems work within this by restricting throughput to 53kbps in the U.S. X2 modems can theoretically work at 56k, although they are constrained to operate 5% slower than this in the U.S. (Some users have reported occasional connections past 53kbps.)"

    (from this page

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Legal, not technical by blogboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I worked for R&D at US Robotics for the first 56K rollout. Cots in the lab, X2 coffee (twice the grounds) as I used to call it, all week and weekend, to beat Rockwell to the punch. And we did. The first batches of course hit in mid-40's but steadily improved. Rockwell would *report* 53K or so but the actual thruput was far less. It was one of the last great times in R&D I had. Line noise is the limit. It explots the digital switching on the network. Good times.

    2. Re:Legal, not technical by evilned · · Score: 1

      And that 53k is only in one direction. downstream. To dial in and receive at 56k, the other side has to be a digital line, ala ISDN. Upstream is only 33.6k

      --

      "My head hurts, My feet stink, and I dont love Jesus." -Jimmy Buffett

    3. Re:Legal, not technical by Burdell · · Score: 5, Informative
      The "53k" limit was a problem with the way X2 worked. Blaming it on the FCC is just a marketing scam; the fact is that the US Robotics engineers couldn't make X2 hit 56k and still work within the pre-defined limits of the telephone system, so they tried to blame someone else.

      Lucent's 56k system could actually do 56k and stay within the limits, but the v.90 standard didn't use Lucent's technology for that.

      As to why nothing is more than 56k: that is all that a standard voice line (or POTS line, for Plain Old Telephone System) can do. A POTS line is carried within a DS0 (the base channel of the phone system), and a DS0 is 64k. You can't get all 64k though, because many voice lines use "robbed bit" signalling that takes one of every eight bits to handle switch communication. Getting 56k at all requires that one end be a digital line (ISDN BRI or PRI or channelized T1); you can't push 56k through the analog to digital conversion otherwise.

      The "what's next" for the telephone system is already here; it is DSL. DSL uses different frequency bands that are not used for POTS lines but that can be carried over the same copper reliably (more or less). However, DSL is not a switched circuit like a modem connection; the DSL frequencies are pulled off the line (by a DSLAM, DSL Access Multiplexer) before the line connects to the regular phone network. So, you can't "dial" a different DSL provider or your friend's house; you can only be connected to one service (and any changes require a call to the DSLAM owner, usually the phone company).

      The other "what's next" was ISDN, which would give you the full 64k channel (because signalling is always done on a separate dedicated channel with ISDN), or 128k if you use both channels (the base ISDN line is a BRI, which has 2 64k data channels plus a signalling channel). However, ISDN use was slowed because it was complicated to configure (you couldn't just plug a phone in and use it), required all new equipment, and even the telcos really never understood it well (so when there was a problem, it could take weeks to get it fixed).

    4. Re:Legal, not technical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, maybe you can answer something for me. USR sent out some free Sportsters with special ROMs loaded around 1996. They included a program and a request to call certain phone numbers and let it generate a data file. Then you dialed the BBS and uploaded the file. After that, you could pop in another ROM and it became a normal 33.6 PnP model.

      My guess is that they were doing this to test the phone systems all over the country to see if X2 was viable. I figured they picked me because I was in on the sysop deal and had done the V.FC field trial for the Couriers.

      Was I right? I can't think of any other reason why they would do something like that.

      One final question, if I may: was the flashable Courier daughterboard really called the Whitney, and if so, was any other part of it called the Houston?

    5. Re:Legal, not technical by blogboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, I remember that X2 analysis feature, don't remember the commands tho :) The USR BBS were X2 Total Control racks. Part of the negotiation is a line analysis phase, which was used to determine the best protocol to use (that's the bonging noises testing for 56K capability.)

      I think the V.FC couriers needed a daughterboard upgrade in order to support the X2/56K code; the V.34's just needed to flash update their ROM. USR supported the hell out of their Couriers--they knew who their important customers were IMO.

      The Whitney was USR's most reliable platform. You could tell what board you had by the last few numbers of your modem's serial number. I think if it ended with 00 you had a Whitney.

      Don't know the Courier daughterboard name. There was no Houston IIRC. The modem names were based on Harley Davidson motorcycle names (Courier, Sportster) Not sure where the internal board names came from...

      HTH

    6. Re:Legal, not technical by chiph · · Score: 1

      The other "what's next" was ISDN, which would give you the full 64k channel (because signalling is always done on a separate dedicated channel with ISDN), or 128k if you use both channels (the base ISDN line is a BRI, which has 2 64k data channels plus a signalling channel). However, ISDN use was slowed because it was complicated to configure (you couldn't just plug a phone in and use it), required all new equipment, and even the telcos really never understood it well (so when there was a problem, it could take weeks to get it fixed).

      I was one of the few people in Raleigh to have an ISDN line from BellSouth. Man, it rocked -- with both channels bonded to get 128kbs, I could download 2.3 times as fast as anyone else! But then ... one day it stopped working. The BellSouth techs kept saying it passed their circuit tests, but it wouldn't connect to my ISP. I'm sure they changed the provisioning for some arbitrary reason, but wouldn't admit to it. After 3 weeks without service I had to go back to dial-up in order to get stuff done online. What a letdown after high speed connectivity!

      The biggest problem (and what ultimately killed the service in general) was the price. ISDN pricing was set back then by the state utilities commission at $73 a month. Checking the BellSouth site, PRI ISDN (1.45mbps) is the only option listed and only for small businesses. Residential BRI ISDN isn't even listed anymore -- it's "call us for a quote", so it's effectively dead.

      Chip H.

  16. Broad Band Revolutionaries by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you mean the great girl bands of the past? The Supremes, the Ronettes, or even the GoGos?

    Check "VH-1 Where Are They Now?" to find out the fate of those great Broad Bands of the past.

    I know about "Heart". They look like Roseanne Barr now.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Broad Band Revolutionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rosanne Barr is skinny now.

    2. Re:Broad Band Revolutionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rosanne Barr is skinny now.

      only compared to what she used to be

  17. I got my Multitech 300 Acoustic coupler out by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Informative
    and dialed until I found this AT command Set

    Relive the good ol' days at textfiles.com

    1. Re:I got my Multitech 300 Acoustic coupler out by jmccay · · Score: 1

      AOL still uses the AT commands, and you can edit them. I think I lost my old Hayes booklet that had the commands. Glad to see there is an online resource. What does ~ mean though?

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    2. Re:I got my Multitech 300 Acoustic coupler out by ebacon · · Score: 1

      Of course, you know that when trying to establish a ppp connection, pppd at 300 baud will time out before the tcp session is fully constructed, right?

  18. "If early on he had taken the company public ..." by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    If early on he had taken the company public and brought in professional managers, "the guy would be a billionaire today."

    If the dot.com bust taught us anything, it's that taking a company public while trusting professional managers is the quickest way to get yourself a big fat tax loss.

  19. Tough times, eh? by mattACK · · Score: 2, Funny
    #ATDT18005518900

    Connected at 1200 baud
    ---
    Welcome to the Diesel Driving Academy BBS. The road starts right here!
    If you haven't been innundated by their commercials, this might not make sense to you.

    --


    "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
  20. XModem by wombatmobile · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everybody who knows Hayes remembers Ward Christensen's Xmodem file transfer protocol.

    This was Ward in 1980. I wonder where he is now?
    1. Re:XModem by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      XMODEM, YMODEM and ZMODEM. I liked XMODEM and YMODEM but I loved ZMODEM because it got files in bigger 1024kbit chunks?

      KERMIT, on the other hand, was a big fat peice of junk. Would take forever to download stuff.

      I still feel wierd being hooked up to the internet without having heard my modem screech. :)

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    2. Re:XModem by MavEtJu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I loved ZMODEM because it got files in bigger 1024kbit chunks?

      Hold your horses, zmodem only went to 8192 byte blocks. 1Mb blocks would suck if you had to wait 20 minutes for each block to be retransmitted :-)

      Edwin

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    3. Re:XModem by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 1

      I used his stuff on my Ampro CPM 64 and it rocked. Actually got me into trouble for some of the first ATM - bank teller hacks here in PA. Ah the good old days when there was no security in dialups...And yes i was using a brand new shiny external Hayes 300. I still have all of the above hardware. Suprisingly it all works quite well !! Thanks Ward !!

      --
      *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
  21. In other news... by MindSlap · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The inventers of the Buggy whip are also looking for the next 'big thing'

    Granted... this statement is not to belittle those that created the AT command set and Modulation/demoduation protocols, but rather to illustrate that technology marches on....

    1. Re:In other news... by MindSlap · · Score: 1

      How is that 'off topic'?

      (Me things my sig pissed somebody off!)

      And yes.. 'this' post IS off topic.. ;-)

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that 'off topic'?

      We are Slashdot of Org.
      You will be moderated.
      Relevance is foobar.
  22. Don't forget this by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know people like to gloss over this stuff but it needs to be restated.

    Gates and Jobs were both programmers in their own right. Just because they didn't STICK with the hardcore tech side doesn't mean they were never there to begin with.

    Gates coded early versions of Basic software/DOS and Jobs coded Atari games and helped manufacture the first Apple's.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Don't forget this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Jobs got Woz to write the Atari games.

      And Jobs stiffed Woz on the money Atari paid them.

      See:
      This Google cache of www.woz.org/letters/general/09.html.

      See also:
      This second google cache of www.woz.org/letters/general/53.html

      You'll need to scroll down a little, but the paragraphs to look at have highlighting in them.

    2. Re:Don't forget this by Merk · · Score: 1

      I've heard that Gates coded stuff at some point. I have trouble believing it. I wish someone had saved the source for that so we could see how badly Billy wrote Basic.

    3. Re:Don't forget this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read. Comphrend. Post.

      Gates DID program a DOS, it's just not MS-DOS.

      He also did program parts of what became MS-DOS to suit the IBM PC.

      You = the suck

    4. Re:Don't forget this by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could Gates code? A friend of mine called in a bug report on one of the early assemblers since it didn't understand a specifc opcode. Billy Gates answered the phone and fixed the program to deal with the new opcode. The problem is that his fix wasn't by adding it to the opcode table like it should have been, he hard coded in a special check. That special check required the opcode to be in all CAPs and didn't deal with operands at all.

      I figure Gates was the sort of boss that though he could code and his employees went along with it. His strenth was being able to put together deals and having his mommy work her United Way contacts didn't hurt one bit.

    5. Re:Don't forget this by Jason+Scott · · Score: 1

      I have interviewed a number of people who have analyzed Bill Gates' code, specifically his work creating BASIC interpreters in the 1970s, which is not the last of but certainly near the peak of his "pure-coding" phase, before he moved into a more managerial position. The resounding answer appears to be that could code very well indeed and created tight, useful work.

      There was an analysis of the code called "Inside Altair BASIC" by Reuben Harris. Sadly, it is off the net and I am unable to find a copy of it.

    6. Re:Don't forget this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Re: Don't forget this (Score:-1)"

      Posted with two references and still got modded down. Ouch. Someone didn't like his fairytale history shattered.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. -1, Offtopic.

  23. In lieu of the vi vs. emacs debate... by RevMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm proud to initiate the Xmodem vs Kermit flamewar.

    Let's get ready to RUMBLE!

    Extra points for anyone who can segue smoothly into an Anti-Bush/Anti-US rant.

    1. Re:In lieu of the vi vs. emacs debate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zmodem rules your pathetic Xmodem and Kermit protocols. :-P

    2. Re:In lieu of the vi vs. emacs debate... by metlin · · Score: 1

      ...Or bring in the Nazis to invoke Godwin's law ;-)

    3. Re:In lieu of the vi vs. emacs debate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kermit is so fucking typical of you government types. Send a bit across the wire. Ask everyone if it's okay. Send another bit. Anyone got a problem yet? Sure, if I accidentally pick up the phone during a Kermit transfer, my session will still be valid. But you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater! It's too fucking slow! You'll never get the data! You gotta use something like Zmodem which gives the best compression.

      It's just like the airports now-a-days. President Bush has made so many regulations I can't even ride the plane! I checked in and went through security, and I was supposed to fly out at 11:40. But they oversold and gave me a seat on a different airline at 12:40. By the time I got to the other side of the enormous government-run airport, it was 12:30 -- and they didn't have any George Bush agents to search through my belongings _again_ to make sure that I still wasn't a crazy terrorist. So I missed the plane because George Bush wants too many intrusive, redundant regulations! Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, that's what I call it. I wish Bush had learned from the whole Kermit debacle.

    4. Re:In lieu of the vi vs. emacs debate... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK. I'm always up for a challenge...

      Dude, XModem sucks! Use ZModem! But whatever you do, don't even think of using Kermit. After all, if you remember Operation Sundevil back in ... what was it ... '92? Someone from Steve Jackson Games explains to a Secret Service guy that Kermit's a 7-bit protocol, and they raided the shop because "only a hacker" would know that (that is, after the SS figured out that Kermit wasn't a specific person). Gives you some insight into the United States intelligence services, doesn't it? Talk about oxymorons... and hey, while we're on the subject of morons, what about the Chimp In Chief, eh? I understand he went to Iraq for Thanksgiving ... great. Piss off the Kurds by bringing Turkey into the whole situation...

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    5. Re:In lieu of the vi vs. emacs debate... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      So close...you forgot the Anti-US remark. Just needed to stick an "Oh yeah, the US sucks." in your post to qualify.

  24. They were a breakthrough by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    I bought two Smartmodem 300s when they first came out. I remember when I called the distributor they had never heard of them. Before we were using Universal Data Systems line-powered modems. These didn't have dialers so being able to dial from a terminal or application was like magic. Hayes also made a Smartclock which was just a clock with a RS232 interface but it was simpler and cheaper than anything else on the market.

  25. Founders of the dial-up revoltion? by xtermin8 · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is somewhat off-topic, but I think the honor of that particular title should be "The World" http://www.TheWorld.com operated by Software Tool & Die. Since 1989, the first public dialup Internet Service Provider (ISP) on the planet. And we're still proud to be the best. These other guys may have set up the technology, but "the revolution" is another matter. Its like crediting K&R for starting Open Source. Not quite.

  26. I still use a dialup modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still a few BBS's local in my area so I use my analog modem sometimes just to give it a workout. Lots of telnet BBS's these days at places like telnet://toga.cx.

    1. Re:I still use a dialup modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TELNET RULES!!! BAN SSH! :)

  27. Dale Heatherington by chroma · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've met him a few times at Robot Battles, where we both compete. Dale is the only guy I know of who not only builds robots, but also:
    1. makes his own radio control system
    2. builds his own motor controllers
    3. winds his own motors
    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    1. Re:Dale Heatherington by chroma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I should also point out that although I've spoken with Dale many times, and even visited his lovely home, this article was a bit of a revelation to me. I had no idea that he was connected to Hayes. When I asked him what he did before retiring, he simply told me that he was an electrical engineer.

      --

      Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    2. Re:Dale Heatherington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like the geek's equivalent of not mentioning that your real name is Anne Rice.

    3. Re:Dale Heatherington by llefler · · Score: 1

      Of course he winds his own motors, he doesn't have a job.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  28. That's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you might notice: the chief engineer left early with hundreds of millions of dollars, while the CEO got stuck with the headaches and the big empty bankrupt company.

    That's my kind of happy ending!

    1. Re:That's right by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      20 million hardly counts as "hundreds of millions" but nice try.......

    2. Re:That's right by Galvatron · · Score: 0

      Feh, at that point, who really cares? He can stick it in one of those government bonds that pays inflation + 3%, and have an effective annual income of $600,000 per year for doing nothing ever again (it'd be even more if you want to solve the more complex problem of taking out a certain amount of the principal each year, with the intention of running out at, say, age 90). That seems like adequate compensation to me.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:That's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, yes, only 20 million.

      Still a happy ending for the geek!

    4. Re:That's right by llefler · · Score: 1

      I think one of the points of the article was that he chose a lifestyle where $20 million was all he would ever need. I suspect the cost of living in Roswell is pretty low.

      There's a small problem with your calculation though, if you'll read closely, you find that he got $20 million in payments spread across 10 years.

      Even so, give me $2 million a year for 10 years and I'll never work another day. I might even build robots and put an electronic tracker on my cat too.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    5. Re:That's right by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Okay, well it's simple enough to do a present value calculation. Assuming a discount rate of 10% (double what he'd be earning in his risk free bond), that'd be equivalent to an immediate payment of $13.5 million, enough to pay him $405,000 per year in interest. If he wanted to deduct from the principal, with even payments over the next 55 years, he'd get $505,000 per year.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  29. Re:Corporate Broadband Still Available by skidv · · Score: 1

    David Schaeffer is still CEO of Cogent Communications. Broadband for the corporate client.

  30. I also bailed out.... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back in 1995/1996 when 56K modems were becoming the rage I also folded shop and sold my mid-sized ISP that was serving 2 cities. Hayes modem cards in a 19 inch rack chassi were the standard then, 33.6 was the MAX you could get on a good day and ISP's like me that spent the long dollar for the real modems instead of a pile of crap sportsters like one company I remember you could get that speed. (I started as an ISP when 14.400 was the fastest you could get.)

    56K killed it for most of us... T1's required for incoming lines as well as horribly priced interfaces for the 56K dial up side made it impossible for the medium/small guy to survive. the Small towns I was going into and started out with 3-4 modems now had a minimum of 24 incoming lines because of the T1 requirement. each dial in node now doubled all it's costs for operation and quadrupled it's costs for equipment.

    Dial-up died when 56K came around.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I also bailed out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the former owner/president/CTO/janitor of a moderately successful ISP who got out in '99, the worst part about the advent of the 56K lines and their dependence on PRI circuits is that the telco (NYNEX in this case) refused to transfer long-term commitments for analog lines into commitments for the digital circuits. We were left holding the bag for about 60 POTS lines because we'd gone with a long-term Centrex contract.

      We made a little money when we sold (got out just in time!) but if I hadn't had to pay off those damn Centrex contracts, I would have been able to buy a new car.

      To add insult to injury, every time we tried to add lines into our NOC, we were told there were "facilities issues" meaning they were short on copper pairs in the area. They'd have had plenty if they'd just let us re-negotiate the contracts.

      Bastards.

      At least I don't shake when I start telling my telco stories now.

    2. Re:I also bailed out.... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back in Spokane, most of the ISP's moved to the local Telco/bank building where we could buy T1's without haul charges. They just had to wire cat5 down to our room's. (Couple ladders, and you had a t1 hooked up that afternoon.)

      With a room for a couple hundred, and savings per T1, a few livingston portmasters, and bam. ISP was 56K enabled. Being in the telco building also helped when you needed more digital circuits.

      I left the small mom and pop ISP business and went to work for a telco before DSL came out. I always wonder how they hang on when the most customers drop dialup and move to cheap 30 bux a month DSL.

      BTW, I remember when almost everyone ran WWIV BBS, and you could send email almost anywhere, and then the sysop fights started, WWIV BBS broke off into thier own groups, the national WWIV BBS chain was gone. Couple hundred BBS's all over the world, it was amazing, early version of the Internet. Real message forums, and email that worked. When it broke down, I gave up on BBS's. Lucky the Internet thingy was here, and we started migrating people to pay BBS's that had Internet access. Then added PPP module, then became a full ISP. You get the picture.

    3. Re:I also bailed out.... by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Couple hundred BBS's all over the world, it was amazing, early version of the Internet.

      Too bad the internet was already 10-15 years old at this point. WWIV is like an emulation of something that already existed, it's just no one knew about it.

    4. Re:I also bailed out.... by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I mean like Internet applications today, we had email, files, newsgroups, and chat across the nation using BBS's, while using DOS as the main os. Aka, an early version. ;)

      Good Internet history can be found at zakon.org.

  31. kermit by ftide · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In many ways kermit and its ymodem/zmodem counterparts are better then TCP/IP. Kermit is fast for BBS style transactions, simple and has no exploits! (L4m3 deprecated DOS stuff notwithstanding)

    Who's down for developing a ppp-centered, kermit-over-IP protocol for places communicating by telephone only? I wrote a whitepaper on this and sent it to the Redhat/K12 newsletter.

    Does anyone have easy to decipher conversion specs for baud xfer and UART? I've speculated most of the work is in hardware translation at the local level (send/receive from users end). I'd say bring in existing codes but projects like CKermit are too encumbered by Columbia elites or whatever school it is with their own agenda. Engineers and phreakers alike drop me a line. I'm in NW U.S.

    1. Re:kermit by kevinbr · · Score: 1

      But what about UUCP? My first Internet account was via Trinity College, Dublin, via UUCP. A university in the UK arranged to forward my dialin via IP to Ireland. I remember getting 4Kbytes a second downloads for email in 1992. With a 9,6 compressing. Remember the Digital Equipment email ftp servers? The excitement when all 57 email segments worked and you had a real download. When I switched to ppp, boy was email downloads slow.

    2. Re:kermit by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 1

      Who's down for developing a ppp-centered, kermit-over-IP protocol for places communicating by telephone only?

      Why not use smoke signals or carrier pidgens? Or, if you gotta have 'lectricity in the mix, one of those fancy telegraph machines.

      You do remember your Morse codes, right?

      --

      --
      You sure got a purty mouth...

  32. Hey bartender! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was in that bar once.

    To get his attention, you'd to yell: +++

    1. Re:Hey bartender! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehehe, informative, my ass. Try "phunney".

  33. So you could say that ... by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    That 56K killed the dialup star?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  34. Correction. by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs never in his life did any tech woprk Woz was the one..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:Correction. by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what the parent said. Woz did all the work, made some cash, and got out...

    2. Re:Correction. by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      Steve Jobs never in his life did any tech woprk Woz was the one..

      Actually, a four second google search would reveal this link. Here's the relevant part (emphasis mine):

      Going to work for Atari after leaving Reed College, Jobs renewed his friendship with Steve Wozniak. The two designed computer games for Atari and a telephone "blue box", getting much of their impetus from the Homebrew Computer Club. Beginning work in the Job's family garage they managed to make their first "killing" when the Byte Shop in Mountain View bought their first fifty fully assembled computers.
      Always make sure that the facts line up with your mythology. Woz was always technically superior to Jobs, but Jobs has worked in the tech industry, not in marketing, before co-founding Apple.
      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  35. that story brought tears to my eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it really did
    *sniff*

    1. Re:that story brought tears to my eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost farted.

    2. Re:that story brought tears to my eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son of a bitch. That was real funny. Go write dialogs for Strongbad...

  36. And for all the college boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading some of the pompous replies in the recent Linux Certification topic, it's worth pointing out that Heatherington was not a 4-year CS major:

    The company was recruiting people with master's degrees and Ph.D.s. Heatherington had a two-year degree from a technical college. "I think he felt funny having that kind of horsepower looking to him for guidance," Hayes says.

    Keep that in mind when you sit there complaining about all us 'pseudo-engineers' that didn't have the cash to get a degree, but had the brains to make a difference in computing.

    1. Re:And for all the college boys by Hayzeus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Woz? Is that you?

    2. Re:And for all the college boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...but had the brains to make a difference in computing.

      And, hence, the difference, as a VAST majority of the Slashbots are not similarly endowed.

    3. Re:And for all the college boys by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      ... and the brains to get out while the gettin' was good.

  37. Re:I worked there by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

    If that's the kind of things that happened at computer companies in the 1980's, I can totally understand why all the engineers were trying so hard to build smaller computers.

    --
    This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  38. Marriage is killing the guy by zymano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's not a millionaire anymore with ex-wives taking most of his income. Kind of sad. No wonder people aren't getting married anymore.

    1. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It hardly matters, when even living with someone for a few months gives them the same "rights" as a married spouse.

      The wise man in the 21st Century gets good and used to living as a bachelor and never, ever enjoying sex without a metaphorical garbage bag tied around his sex organ.

      What a time to be alive.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    2. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that it was actually his extravagent lifestyle that burned away most of his net worth.

    3. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by zymano · · Score: 1

      Prenup.

    4. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      "Ex-wives". You need to learn the difference between marriage and divorce.

      -Me, Still happily married to the same woman for over 25 years.

    5. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder people aren't getting married anymore.

      Gay people are. Oh , no wait....

    6. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please cite a common law marriage statute that goes into effect after 2 months of living with someone. You can't? Then you are spreading FUD, pure and simple. Knock it off.

    7. Re:Marriage is killing the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about two months? Goodbye.

  39. Hayes saved my bacon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The university I was at had a perpetual shortage of terminals on campus for their VM/SP system. After the usual tricks of removing the fuse from a terminal or putting the terminal into some mode where it appeared to be broken stopped working, I got got my own microcomputer at home and started dialing in. It soon turned out that cheap-ass U had only 5 dialup lines and contention was FIERCE. If the line dropped on my acoustic modem I sometimes had to dial for an hour to get another line. Enter Hayes and their wonderful autodial modem; I made a MS Basic program to continually dial and to immediately redial if the connection was lost. This worked beautifully and I practically had a home VM terminal for 2 years. Thanks again Hayes! (Posted anon 'cause I made a LOT of enemies doing this).

  40. Uma, oprah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uma, oprah? Uma, oprah? Umo, oprah?

  41. I work in Denis's old office! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hey,

    I have worked for GPN (formarly NDC) since 1998 and moved in to Denis's old office last year. Yes while he was teamed up on all this he sat in this office and looked out this window! Funny thing is I now run the network over here and connectivty is still a core value. . .

    Now if only I could score some cash on the side. . .

    Ian Griswold
    Director WAN/LAN Engineering
    GlobalPayments Inc.

    1. Re:I work in Denis's old office! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Setup a WiFi ISP in a Rural area for some extra cash, they are
      billing out at big bucks here where I live, and hang them
      of water towers, grain elevators, and any other tall structure .

      All you need is a proxy server, and a fiber head end with an
      ATM card in the proxy server .

      WiFi is the new Dial up revolution, the ppl where there is
      no broadband can theoretically get it soon .

      WiMAX 802.16 may be used for the lang shots though .

      Wo0T

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  42. Laugh if you must... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure dial 1200 or 2400 is up is slow, but back then we made good use of the stuff, mainly by doing direct host dial up rather than IP (not that there were a lot of ISPs back then). First up, no IP wrapper overheads. Second, you used text terminals - no graphics. Real work was more than just a theoretical possibility.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Laugh if you must... by masonsas · · Score: 1
      Absolutely. My first modem was a 300 baud acoustic coupler, but then I was ecstatic when I could afford a 1200 baud AppleCat modem for my Apple ][. Dialing up BBSes to trade software cracking tips was quickly replaced when I found a local publicly-accessible Unix system. I was in high school, and at 1200 baud dialup, I learned to use ed (no terminal emulator yet, so no vi!). I taught myself C and shell scripting all via 1200 baud dialup. When I became a sysadmin and had access to the 9600 baud console, I figured nothing could be any faster. Funny how times change.

      But hey, nethack at 9600 baud was still kickass.

    2. Re:Laugh if you must... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      Move over young 'uns us oldies are coming through...

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
  43. Ah yes, my first smartmodem by renehollan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ... a 300 baud direct-connect beast made by Hayes. Plunked down some CA$420 at the time.

    I didn't have a computer (yet), but it was a joy to type the appropriate AT commands from my MIME I video terminal (complete with lower case character set!) instead of having to dial the phone.

    Before I had a real computer (a homebrew SWTPC 6809-based clone running Flex), and WAY before I had an IBM PC clone, I built a 6809-based SBC with 4K EPROM, 2K RAM (IIRC, it may have been more, but not much), and three serial ports. I wrote a monitor program for it so I could enter code, in hex, by hand (later, I would write a cross-assembler on Concordia University's CYBER 835 mainframe in Pascal, that spewed out S1S9 records that the monitor could read).

    One of the first programs (hand assembled at the time), was a "RAM-dialer": it would control the Hayes Smartmodem to repeatedly dial one of a set of numbers until it got a data connection -- see in those days most BBSes had one phone line. Bliss!

    Ah, the nostalgia of the early to mid 1980s.

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:Ah yes, my first smartmodem by linux_author · · Score: 1

      - ah, FLEX!!!! the days of Frank Hogg (the mad dentist in Syracuse), and my good buddy, Dale Puckett (hacker extraordinaire)... - but i never did have a good dialup experience with FLEX... that changed with Microware's OS9... - thanks for the flashback! :-)

    2. Re:Ah yes, my first smartmodem by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Heh.

      In my last undergrad year, I had to take a course, "Advanced Digital Systems" (or something like that - Comp 426, IIRC), but the course included writing a hard disk driver for a small O/S (Flex), and was to be compared against a reference design.

      Trouble was, there was no reference design, and I ended up getting coopted to write one over Christmas break '81-'82.

      The 10 megger 8" hard drive we had was cool, though.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  44. Re:56K limit... Ooops Gotta correct this one :) by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually in europe they have E1 (~2 mbit as apposed to ~1.5mbit total), not a T1(aka DS1) with 30 channels and they can and do run something they call "E1 PRI" over those for 29 B channels and a D channel.

    What you described is US PRI T1 which is 23 B channels with a D channel in the US at 64K each(this is what isdn service is based on, you can also run standard telco calls over them). US also has the standard T1 which is 24 channels as you described.

    In Japan they call theirs a J1 (or PRI J1) and its based on the US standards, only in the yellow alarm generation/detection and the crc-6 calculation methods.

  45. Ward Co-INVENTED the BBS! was Re:XModem by netringer · · Score: 4, Informative
    Everybody who knows Hayes remembers Ward Christensen's Xmodem file transfer protocol. This was Ward in 1980. I wonder where he is now?
    Ward Christensen is right here!

    More importantly, as I've mentioned Ward, with Randy Suess, also INVENTED THE BBS when this very same Dennis Hayes sent them one of his original 300 baud autodial/auto-answer modems.

    Ward will tell you fun details like why CBBS looks for the modem's RING result and then sends the ATO to make the modem answer. CBBS never puts the modem into auto-answer mode.

    Why? So that if the CBBS program wasn't running happily, the caller wouldn't waste money on an answered phone call to a BBS that wasn't working.

    Ward takes more credit for CBBS than the MODEM* protocol because MODEM was written quickly to fix a problem (sending program files to Randy over the modem-modem link) but CBBS was planned. Ward says MODEM was a response "like a sneeze" He doesn't like taking credit for a sneeze.

    * - The real name of the protocol is MODEM. Ward's original MODEM comm program had an option to auto-receive files,. XMODEM was MODEM with the option. When you're the first you don't put in version qualifiers.

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:Ward Co-INVENTED the BBS! was Re:XModem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good ole days of Chinet. It's been awhile, but I believe they offered free email and shell accounts with UUCP for Usenet. After having discovered the net in college (1988), I believe that it was my first 'connection' outside of it.

      Thanks Randy!

      My, how things have changed since! :-)

  46. piiii pooo piii schhhhh by julian_m · · Score: 1

    So, they are the men who invented the weird connections sound!!!
    Why that sound need to be so strange?...

  47. Re:56K limit... Ooops Gotta correct this one :) by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Actually I messed up a bit, E1 PRI is 30 B channels and 1 D channel, not 29 B channels.

  48. I salute you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1, FP!

  49. As they say... by arashiakari · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The pioneers get the arrows, the settlers get the corn.

    1. Re:As they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pioneers get the arrows, the settlers get the corn.

      ...and the natives got smallpox.

  50. Hayes? Bah! by Cthefuture · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All I remember about Hayes is that the one and only item I purchased from them came with a manufacturers rebate that I never received. The only time ever that I've not gotten a rebate back.

    Of course that was back in the early 56k days when Hayes was about to go under. And it's no wonder if they treated their customers like that!

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
  51. Amateur Radio and Dialup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got into the computer buisiness through hacking RS ModI for ham radio and eventually got into IT fulltime doing dialup for phone companies and credit card systems because I saw the similarity in radiocommunications and dial up. Please to hear the current status of these fine gents.

    A Nony Moose CW key-banger RTTY key-puncher

  52. Woz tells it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.woz.org/letters/general/91.html

  53. C64 Telnet BBS by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone's reminiscing about 80's BBSes, so I'll throw in a word about my resurrected dial-up Commodore 64 BBS. (except over Telnet).

    You can call it with a real 64, and there are programs now that support "ATDT 209.151.141.59" and so on. Call it Hayes 2.0 maybe? :-)

    --
    Call Negative Format BBS - Hosted on a real C64!
    Telnet to c64bbs.no-ip.com or 209.151.141.59 Port 23
    http://home.ica.net/~leifb/bbs/

    1. Re:C64 Telnet BBS by acyberpunk · · Score: 1

      Fire up the coupler on the TI Silent Writer with thermo paper... hanging at the Well and other BBS's...paper faded..never really minded though :)

  54. Re: very insightful and interesting by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think there's a LOT to be learned from analyzing this combination of personalities.

    While it's true that the techies seem to "have all the fun" in these scenarios - it's also equally true that the techies needed the business-oriented/business-building personalities of their partners, in order to get themselves into a situation where their contributions became valuable enough to allow them to leave with a big "wad of cash".

    Really, after reading the Hayes/Heatherton article, it appeared to me that Hayes' biggest reason for eventual disaster was a lack of any inventive/R&D motivated people working for him after Heatherton bailed out. Certainly, Hayes achieved all the brand name recognition and marketplace respect a tech. company could ever want. Properly run, his company could have been building, say, the #1 most popular DSL and/or cable modems used today.

    I think Apple Computer thrives for exactly this reason. Steve Jobs is acutely aware that his company has to innovate -- never imitate. He may not be the mastermind behind any of the ideas, but he hires the types of people who can create cool looking and working devices/software.

    The trick is, if you're going to be a "Hayes", keep hiring new "Heathertons" as your earlier ones get burnt out or want to move on.

  55. Huh? by drox · · Score: 1

    To get his attention, you'd to yell: +++

    I tried that and they cut me off!

    (AT H0 gets you cut off too)

  56. Sorry. No Sympathy for Hayes. by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    We're suppose to feel sorry for a guy who married a couple of bimbo's who promptly took his money in the divorce settlement??

    Instead of hangin' with his socialite trophy wife, maybe he should have started an IRA account.

    1. Re:Sorry. No Sympathy for Hayes. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Or sold it for the $140 million he was offered? Yeah, he gets no tears from me. Partially blind at 56? Meet my wife. Partially blind at 18, totally blind at 28.

      Boo frickin' hoo.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Sorry. No Sympathy for Hayes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then at 29 she met you, I guess.

    3. Re:Sorry. No Sympathy for Hayes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://img.coxnewsweb.com/B/03/31/64/image_264313. jpg

      If thats the trophy, what does the loser get?

  57. Re:Hayes? Bah! by 97cobra · · Score: 0

    Hey owm me money too. bastards

  58. Give it time... by telstar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Video killed the radio star...
    Broadband killed the dialup generation...
    But then reality TV killed MTV...
    Ya gotta figure something will come along and wipe out broadband. My bet is on litigation...

  59. Hayes? by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

    What does "defining the Hayes command set" have to do with the dial-up revolution? The invention and development of the modem seems like the key part, not any particular command set. See here for a brief history of the modem. Of course, Hayes's company drove down prices, but they would have come down anyway.

  60. 'Twas a famous victory... by DrDeaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Dial-Up Revolution?

    The AJC reporter writes about Hayes and Heatherington, "making it easier for millions of people around the world to connect to the Internet." Perhaps the reporter didn't know there was anything before the 'net.
    With all deference and due respect to their accomplishment, if we frame the discussion as a "Revolution"... "around the world", then Hayes and Heatherington did build the revolutionary weapon, but the trigger was squeezed by a fellow named Tom Jennings and a few of his friends. That was the shot heard 'round the world.

    Hey! How many here can tell us their nodelisting? Hands?

    Cheers!

    --
    Reports of my deaf have been greatly exaggerated.
    1. Re:'Twas a famous victory... by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, I can still remember it, ten years later.

      1:353/700.1, then 1:353/750, iirc.

      I was "Solaris VII", first a point feed off my buddy Dean's BBS "Starfleet Command", then once it finally got wrangled through the BS interior BC FidoNET politics, I got my own nodenumber.

      Ah, memories. Friends calling me voice, pestering me to put the BBS up ten minutes before 10 PM, so they could be the first online to do their tradewars turns.

  61. hayes is broke ?? by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    a few years ago he settled with his second wife for 6 million ?? so how is that broke ?

    1. Re:hayes is broke ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People's definitions of "broke" differ widely.

      I imagine he's living indoors, has running water, might even have seen a doctor in the past decade, knows where his next meal is coming from, etc.

      Nothing to resemble *my* idea of broke.

    2. Re:hayes is broke ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he's broke NOW!

  62. Hey Dennis! by Multics · · Score: 1
    Yo Dennis;

    I have a couple of S-100 300 baud Modem Boards of yours that needs service.... It isn't even clear to me if it *ever* worked being serial numbers below 50.

    Where shall I send them?

    ;-)

    -- Multics

    1. Re:Hey Dennis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could actually probably get a decent amount of money from a museum somewhere for those. :)

  63. Ah, the broadband days... by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not like it's that much different today, actually.

    Today you download whole movies in Kazaa instead of single images in BBS, but the concept is the same. You waste some time, just to find out that it's something crappy.

    Today the modem sounds are no longer heard and don't wake anyone, but Skyping with people for hours can.

    Just think, a few years from now, you'll say "Voice\Video-on-demand in those days was so difficult!"

  64. Re:Linux is Gay < -- RIGHT!!! by Big_Ass_Spork · · Score: 0

    Please click on my .sig for further evidence of Linux's gayness...

  65. When dinosaurs ruled the earth by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sheesh. Before we bought Hayes modems, the company I worked for had some big honking UDS units with attached telephones. We also had a couple of acoustic couplers; in the Atlanta area, wet lines sometimes meant you only connected at *110 baud*. Slower than snail snot in July at the South Pole.

    And there was no way I could buy a real modem one for home - way too many bucks.

    Then came the Hayes. I used a 2400 baud Hayes for years, well into the 28K revolution (IOW, past the 19.2K glory days of Trailblazers), until lightning took it out. But guess what? The U.S. Robotics 28.8K I bought was based on the command set Hayes popularized.

    I was mildly disappointed my Ascend ISDN router didn't understand AT commands. 8^/ I'm thinking of upgrading to rither cable or DSL, whcih means something much faster and cheaper must be about to break out!

  66. Re:That's wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You did see where Dennis Hayes burned through 2 wives? Alimony and child support are expensive, that's where his money went.

    The lesson here is don't sleep around on your wife, he did this twice. You can't afford it. /judgemental Christian

  67. Website for Dale Heatherington's creations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.wa4dsy.net shows the data modem he constructed, and also has pages of info on his robots.

  68. Hayes' best invention by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    Here. Mmmm, vacuum-fluorescent. I still have one in my basement.

  69. Tandy Model 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have read that the code in the Tandy Model 100 (built in word pro, etc.) was Bill's.

  70. My Hayes experience by darthwader · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was young and poor and stupid, I used to buy the cheapest equipment I could find, and then I would frequently berate myself when the quality turned out to be lousy and I needed to replace it shortly after buying it.

    When I wanted to replace my old 14.4 modem, I decided I wasn't going to fall for that trap again. I wasn't going to buy a cheap clone. I was going to buy a brand name. I was going to pay extra for the security of knowing that it wasn't a compatable, it was the original. I bought a 56k internal Hayes modem. It cost a lot more, but it had a good guarentee and the brand name.

    The modem was built before the 56K standard was offical, and they promised an upgrade to make it compatable when the eventual standard came out. The company folded before that happened.

    Now I have a very expensive 56K modem that can only connect at 33.6 to any standard servers.

    --
    I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
  71. AT&F1^m~ATS11=38^m~ by mikeleemm · · Score: 1

    ATDT1312528-5020
    BUSY
    ATDT1312528-5020
    BUSY
    AT DT1312528-5020
    BUSY
    ATDT1312528-5020
    BUSY
    ATDT 1312528-5020
    CONNECT 2400

    Login:

  72. Too bad about these guys....Rewind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt it will be disappearing anytime in the near future. One a lot of people are still on dialup for various reasons (yours truely). Two with all the issues that broadband has (we all know the ones). So save those modems. They may come in handy in a post-apocalyptic world.

  73. Re: very insightful and interesting by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    Actually, I've heard that when Jobs was at NeXT, he would actually go around and inspect the code being written, and PULL THE PLUG ON THE MACHINE if he didn't like what he saw! What a nutjob!

  74. ZModem by xixax · · Score: 1

    Getting ZModem was the coolest.

    Being able to resume downloads rather than starting from scratch made life _soo_ much easier.

    But you tell kids about XModem, and they'll nawght believe ye!

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  75. AT Command set? BAH!! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    You kids and your fancy auto-dial modem whatzitz.... Back in my day, the modems didn't have a command set. They didn't even do the dialing. You had to pick up the phone yourself, listen for a dial tone, dial the number yourself (yes, on a REAL ROTARY DIAL), listen for the carrier, then FLIP THE SWITCH!!! (D00d, I'll be up all night to flip the switch if you decide to call)

    It didn't matter how good the porn was when you got it, you were just grateful there were no CRC errors.

  76. See: BASF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To comment on those commenting that "it figures", or that the revolutionaries never make it....see BASF. Their slogan says it all: "We don't make the things in your life, we make them better". Nothing like settling for second best, eh?

  77. Moral of the story... by planetoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Moral of the story: don't get married if you're rich and successful.

    --
    Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  78. Hayes is overrated by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The hayes command set is like the Windows API, an accidental and hardly optimal interface that succeeded out of sheer chance, and which used creative and new (at the time) interpretations of intellectual proprty law to try to skewer their opponents.

    The Hayes patent was, eventually, rendered obsolete. It can't happen too soon for Microsoft either.

    1. Re:Hayes is overrated by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Just for giggles.. an 'extension' of the AT command set is used to program T68i phones for use as a bluetooth clicker.. There's SE documentation that covers building internal bookmark lists via AT commands, which is why the P800 isn't supported by the SonyEricsson clicker...

  79. I'd wrap the phones up in duct tape.. by caveat · · Score: 1

    ..after all the long chats with my parents and "DO NOT PICK UP!" post-its failed. Nothing like 4 or 5 wraps on an old-school block of a phone to keep that handset down =D

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  80. Bah, Woz still 0wnZ. by caveat · · Score: 1

    Heatherington is definitely an uber-geek extraordinare, but the whole second-grade-teacher thing, purely for the goodness of it, still puts Steve Wozniak at the top of the all-time greatest h4x0r list ever.

    Seriously...how many of you would teach little kids for the sheer joy of it if you were affluent enough to really not work, and skilled enough to find a much more lucrative job if you did need one?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  81. Good for the economy? by wackybrit · · Score: 1

    If everyone was like Heatherington and split with the cash as soon as they forced it out of someone's greasy mitts, the economy would suck ass. Heck, the stock market would probably cease to exist.

    You need people who keep creating companies and lusting after wealth. It doesn't always work out great for them, but the people who had jobs under them, and the wealth that was created, keeps a capitalist economy going.

    People who spend, spend, spend, do a lot better for the economy than the people who hoard.

    1. Re:Good for the economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, the stock market would probably cease to exist.

      You make that sound like a bad thing.

    2. Re:Good for the economy? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      "You need people who keep creating companies and lusting after wealth"

      Wrong - we don't. Just people who work honestly. "The *love* of money is the root of all evil." (Jesus Christ in the gospels). Note: it's not money that is evil (it's is just a tool), but "the love of money".

      I imagine an economy would function well without greed as a driver. But you can't legislate away greed - it's human nature - instead, the economies of the world attempt to regulate it.

  82. Re: Jobs at NeXT by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Well, it seems to me that was his right - crazy or not. The developers were getting paid for their time, whether or not he wiped out their work....

    It's no big secret the "old days" of computing were full of hostile work environments though. I remember reading about the old Atari corp. actually keeping their programmers locked up inside their buildings when they were nearing release of major game titles on cartridge. They were afraid of information leaking out and a competitor using it against them, so programmers became prisoners.

  83. where they've always been... by hustin · · Score: 1

    in the pr0n industry...

  84. Re: Jobs at NeXT by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the original poster implied that Jobs had no involvement with technical operations. That was the real point of my post. My opinion of his mental state was just "for free." :-)

  85. WWIV BBS echo, eh? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Sounds remarkably like a tiny version of Fidonet. Fidonot had many zones, regions, nodes, and points. It standardized the serial interface via FOSSIL (Fido-Opus-Seadog-Serias-Interface-Layer), which many early BBS software used (such as the Maximus package I used), and the mail programs.

    Through it, you could have message echoes, file echoes, you could offer files for remote login (I had BBSes from Texas dailing in to my Saskatoon BBS and requesting libraries I'd written, it was cool), and request files from remote BBSes. You could also send them via file echoes, so they'd be scheduled and sent between the nodes when the optimal time to call was (I used BinkleyTerm as my front end, it handled all that).

    Towards the end, the technology was really advanced. Maximus version 3 ran on NT, OS/2, and DOS. It had a complete VM and language you compiled to byte code, as well as the MECCA display language. Using it, you'd make MECCA files that were like templates. It could insert anything, and would be tranlated on the fly to ASCII, ANSI, AVATAR, or (thanks to v3) RIP (remote image protocol) -- which was a very fast remote EGA-like display. Mecca itself was internally similar to Avatar.

    The VM language (similar to Pascal and Basic) allowed you to automate it further. Naturally, none of the local teenaged sysops who barely understood computers used Maximus; they were all busy using Renegade with some ansi pack to be leet. I "tricked out" my BBS by having it send long and pretty ansis at the users as much as possible, since this noticably increased my callbacks. People always seemed surprised at what I could do with Maximus ;)

    Anyways, that's my trip down memory lane for the day.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:WWIV BBS echo, eh? by llefler · · Score: 1

      FOSSIL wasn't really a Fido thing. It was simply an interface for communications software so that they didn't have to handle the serial I/O. Think of today's drivers.

      BTW, RemoteAccess and InterMail here. I killed my system in 1999 (after 10 years) because I there wasn't enough interest in keeping it and doing y2k testing.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    2. Re:WWIV BBS echo, eh? by lilchris · · Score: 1

      Wow another Maximus user from Net140! Incredible! :) (I was 1:140/186)

      I must still have my manual for Maximus 3 somewhere, I even got it signed by Scott Dudley.. Maximus 2 was awesome and Maximus 3 was absolutely amazing.. Ahh the good old days of Maximus and FidoNet. BinkleyTerm/Maximus/SquishMail.. It didn't get any better than that!

  86. For a while, anyways.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    I was 1:140/137 (I think 137 .. it's been 4 or 5 years now).

    I'm surprised I can still find webpages for Fidonet and Binkley term, but they're there.

    I makes me wish Maximus run under Linux. Then I could have it setup so that you could telnet in and register an account, and it'd be like a really cool version of the webforums -- more interactive, pretty, and less garbage. I've never really liked web forums, except for a few (Slashdot, Kuro5hin) which have decent layouts and threading of comments :)

    Oh, what's this? Looks like someone did release it... it's Maximus, and Squish message format, and more.

    Maybe we should organize a real, online BBS setup? Not the old Fidonet, but something new?

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:For a while, anyways.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember mine: Zone 1, net 133, node 1024. Are they still fighting about all the Russian nodes? Fido was always arguing about something. Pity.

      Anyway, I ran Maximums, Binkley, Squish, timED, Bluewave... etc. I got into running a BBS just to see how it was done -and damn it was fun! Maximus was a joy. Wound up running my own board and two for other people. Outsourced BBSs, I guess.

      And then everybody got ISP accounts and the local BBS scene sorta collapsed. I think there's one local Fido node left, somewhere. No longer *have* a modem in my computer, not to mention no longer having a comm program that works with XP/Large hard drives/beyond Y2K. I miss ProcomPlus for DOS.

      Some good things came out of running Max. Knowing Mecca (a sort of cousin to HTML, for those who don't know it) was useful when I had to learn HTML. Mecca is on my resume to this day.

      And I got a great dog out of it. He's still around, long after my BBS days ended.

      And yes, I have a vintage Hayes 56K modem, not to mention a Practical Peripherals 28.8 V.fc modem which is the thing that makes that weird modem noise on Kim Kommando's radio show. You've never heard it because that's V.fc, an orphaned protocol from the transition from 33.6 to 56K. Now you have today's worthless factoid.

  87. Baud vs bps by Zapper · · Score: 1

    How true. See baud vs bps for a good explanation.

    --
    So much to do, so little bandwidth.
    --
    Try Mozilla
  88. Sick of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why is it that this article is about the founders of dial up and all most of the people on here do is talk about themselves?

    They act like somebodies Grandpa, "when I was a boy...".

    I'm really sick and tired of tech people being nostalgic. Shut up already. It's a boring subject and it's all been talked to death.

    I don't care if you started on a 386 or had a Tandy computer. I really don't. How about talking about the subject which isn't you.

  89. Correction by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    Correction - the 2nd sentence should have read: "We just need people who work honestly."

  90. Skyping by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    I clicked the link. Now why would I want quality free phone calls?

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  91. That's what I said. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    " It standardized the serial interface via FOSSIL (Fido-Opus-Seadog-Serial-Interface-Layer), which many early BBS software used (such as the Maximus package I used), "

    As in, Binkley Term, Opus, Maximus, Seadog, Fido BBS, and many other pieces of software used it. FOSSIL was an integral part of Fidonet, although Fidonet was created after the start of FOSSIL (IIRC).

    It was sad watching the number of daily callers get smaller and smaller. By the time it was one or two a day, I stopped. No point, really.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:That's what I said. by llefler · · Score: 1
      Fullquote
      Fidonot had many zones, regions, nodes, and points. It standardized the serial interface via FOSSIL (Fido-Opus-Seadog-Serias-Interface-Layer), which many early BBS software used (such as the Maximus package I used), and the mail programs.

      There is no requirement for Fidonet BBSs to use a FOSSIL, several did not. The only requirement is that you support FTS0001 sessions during zone mail hour. At the same time, many BBS packages used a FOSSIL but couldn't participate in Fido without a front end, (QuickBBS, RemoteAccess, and I believe Telegard, Renegade, and probably WWIV) that is why we had Binkley, FrontDoor, and InterMail.

      I have seen comments that the FOSSIL specification was based on Tom Jennings' FidoBBS serial routines. But I wouldn't go as far as to say that Fidonet 'standardized the serial interface'. That makes it appear that Fidonet was THE thing driving the standardization, when in fact it was just one or them. FOSSIL was a BBS thing in general, and pretty much died with them.

      The FOSSIL specification was just a simple way for programmers to access the comports. Particularly when you had programs like X00 that provided highly optimized interfaces. It was more of a why reinvent the wheel type of thing. We didn't write our own mouse drivers either.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  92. You might also want to check out.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Maximus for UNIX.

    Hella cool, I say. I found this last night!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.