Slashdot Mirror


Spirit's First Mars Images

An anonymous reader writes "First panoramic and overhead polar views of Mars, a quarter billion miles away are available. Some spectacular examples and accompanying commentaries are at NASA's Astrobiology Magazine, and JPL."

406 comments

  1. first typo by Soulfarmer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I still keep wondering how fast ppl try to get that first post. No spell check in that time of course...

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  2. first panoramic by chimpo13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, that's just Tatooine. Man, what a rip-off.

    1. Re:first panoramic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Tunisia to me.

    2. Re:first panoramic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget to Alt-Tab out of SWG? :)

    3. Re:first panoramic by aled · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone should call RIAA or something.
      Wasn't supposed to be the red planet? eh? this is eh, like, a purple planet.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    4. Re:first panoramic by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Funny

      Looks like they are reusing the soundstage used to fake the moon landings. Be on the lookout for shadows going in unusual directions and a hoax special expose produced in a joint venture between Art Bell and that megalith of journalistic integrity and fair reporting, Fox.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    5. Re:first panoramic by criordan · · Score: 1

      No, it's Hoth!

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    6. Re:first panoramic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No - it's just Main Street, USA after WalMart move in just down the road

    7. Re:first panoramic by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Will it star O.J.Simpson?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    8. Re:first panoramic by rx888 · · Score: 1

      Check out the cartoon at http://www.mars.fm Peace, Rx

  3. Problem with images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    The first image suffers from low-light "auterco-feedback" and the rest from "vacuum malaise". There are several distracting artifacts, and it looks as if they all underwent airbrushing before final release.

    Is there any known way to take clear, reality-matching photos of Mars and get them back to Earth OK?

    I read at the JPL site that the next Rover will carry a 5MP CCD camera encased in bubbleshield glass, which might just do the trick...

    1. Re:Problem with images by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Informative
      FWIW, there's a slightly less blurry version of that first image here

      There's loads of images here.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Problem with images by sreid · · Score: 1

      you've got to figure that the transmission rate for these probes is probably not broadband and sending a 5MP image may take a while

    3. Re:Problem with images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Could they take along one of those X10 cameras? Then they're bound to catch some nubile Martian princess in the shower.

      Strictly in the scientific interest of proving life exists on Mars, you understand.

    4. Re:Problem with images by p4ul13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to another article on the same site HERE , the data transfer rate is exceeding their expectations 150% by sending "24 megabits per second" which certainly isn't broadband, but it ain't that bad either.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    5. Re:Problem with images by SlightOverdose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the average broadband connection is (probably) 1.5mbit/s. I think 24mbps is a lot fast than that.

    6. Re:Problem with images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet their ping time is shit, though...

    7. Re:Problem with images by jest3r · · Score: 3, Informative
      The RAW images before being pieced together in Photoshop can be found here:

      http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit. html

      Link

    8. Re:Problem with images by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet their ping time is shit, though...

      Unless you are a Martian.

    9. Re:Problem with images by SmilingBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      The information in the article is incorrect. 24 Mbit (or 3 MBytes) of data were received in total over a couple of minutes at a speed of 128 kbps (This was for the first pass of the Odyssey orbiter). 128 kbps relates to the transmission speed from the orbiters to the Deep Space Network on Earth. That's not broadband, but it's not bad either, given the distance! The direct link from the rover to Earth will be much slower with around 12 kbps (but longer time periods of communication can be achieved each day compared to passes of the orbiters). However, this will only happen once the high-gain antenna is operable (which will probably be later today) and the Earth is visible from the rover.

    10. Re:Problem with images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And they are the raw stereo pairs (note the filenames with an "L" for left and "R" for right for each pair). Very cool, even if only in greyscale and at low resolution. It will be great when the high-res pans are eventually made in colour and 3D. It will be like standing on the surface.

    11. Re:Problem with images by Explo · · Score: 1

      Why not use something like Panorama Tools and a suitable GUI frontend for the creation of the panoramas? I think that PT is even available as Photoshop plug-in. It does really nice work with perspective/barrel distortion etc. correction and with a frontend, is easy to use as well.

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
    12. Re:Problem with images by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Out of all the billions that went into that rover, couldn't they have afforded a _REAL_ panoramic camera?

      I know of a digital camera that costs $210, maybe I should E-Mail them

    13. Re:Problem with images by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      But, taking another look at this image, mars' surface is beautiful. I can imagine a city out there...

  4. Awe Inspiring by linux_user_31337 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No matter how many space missions are made, this stuff still puts me in awe. I know that quite a few NASA guys lurk on /., and all I can say is: good work!

    1. Re:Awe Inspiring by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What took my breath away was a quote:

      O'Keefe: I'm told in a golf analogy, that landing on Mars is a hole-in-one, from Paris to Tokyo.

      Good work all round!

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    2. Re:Awe Inspiring by pe1rxq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe in some ways, like distance and target area size...
      But in other ways its very different, like you can't alter the golfballs course half way over the atlantic but you can adjust the course of a marse probe a bit.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Awe Inspiring by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      but it is similar in the way that the cup's pin has a gravitational pull...um..never mind

      --Joey

    4. Re:Awe Inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from NASA.

      And a proud Trollkore member.

    5. Re:Awe Inspiring by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read the article, you would see he likened it to a par 5 course. You're going to have five shots to get it to its target, and after each shot, you get to correct the direction of it to be headed where you want it.

      It's the same thing with the probe- you launch it and subsequently have a number of chances to correct the course. By the "fourth shot" they had the "ball" headed right at the target, making it a birdie.

      This entire mission has been an amazing success, no matter how you look at it. If the next probe that will land later this month is also a success, we are clearly headed in the right direction.

    6. Re:Awe Inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>But in other ways its very different, like you can't alter the golfballs course half way

      I think you read that wrong. It's exactly like making a hole in one over the atlantic.

      What would it take to make such a hole-in-one? The same thing it took to get a lander on mars.

      Lots of money.
      Our brightest minds.
      Our best technology.

      A golfball with propulsion, guidance system..etc etc etc.

    7. Re:Awe Inspiring by iron_weasel · · Score: 1

      I thought Keefe had been shitcanned after the last diaster. Why is an accountant still running this I wondered then and still do. I bet many astronauts wonder what the hell also.

      Yeh OT. I know but why should he get any PR?

    8. Re:Awe Inspiring by stuuf · · Score: 1

      How many golf balls have retro-rockets, guidance computers, parachutes, etc?

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    9. Re:Awe Inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Caddyshack 3, coming this fall.

    10. Re:Awe Inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that was pretty unnecessary. I mean, everyone already hates you.

  5. Colour calibration? by cperciva · · Score: 0

    It looks like the colour calibration is a bit lacking in those images.

    Where did that Marsdial go, again?

    1. Re:Colour calibration? by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      you think, congratulations you have shown an observation! next your be telling us /.'s default theme is green and the sky is blue. ;)

      --
      moo
    2. Re:Colour calibration? by ptbob · · Score: 1

      When the stereo camera starts up you will see some spectacular pictures. Should we start looking for our red/blue glasses yet?

    3. Re:Colour calibration? by VertigoAce · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Those are black and white images. The bluish color results from taking a picture of the big screen at JPL as these images were shown (or doing screen grabs of NASA TV). The first color images should be sometime Sunday night.

      I was watching these (on NASA TV) as they came in and it was just amazing. Everyone at JPL was really quiet as they knew the data was about to come in. As earth had already set, this data (~12 minutes) was being relayed by Mars Odyssey. The first couple images were really dark and small. You got the impression most people had no idea what they were, but none the less everyone was cheering that they were getting data and pictures back. They got at least one picture that was taken during landing that they weren't expecting. Then the big detailed pictures of the landing site started coming in and everyone was just in awe. Pretty quickly they combined images into mosaics and panoramic shots. I can't wait until they get their good cameras up and running. The commentator was saying the resolution will be hight enough that the pictures will still look good when blown up to the size of a movie screen.

    4. Re:Colour calibration? by SSJVegeto2001 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The pictures that have been released were taken by Spirit's Nav Cam, and at only 1/4th of the Nav Cam's maximum resolution. Remember, we weren't even expecting images at all yet. We were only able to take these because we only had a relatively small amount of time to transmit data (at 24 megabits per second). Larger images and color images from the Pan Cam will be coming by evening when Spirit's high gain antenna is directly in line with Earth. Then we'll have the bandwidth for the higer resolution (3 times the maximum resoultion of the Nav Cam, 12 times higher resolution than what we've seen so far) color images that the Pan Cam is capable of taking. It will probably take a few days to get an accurate full color panorama of the landing site.

    5. Re:Colour calibration? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      the pictures will still look good when blown up to the size of a movie screen.

      Ooooh! Mars Omnimax?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Colour calibration? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      transmit data (at 24 megabits per second)

      according to spaceflightnow.com

      "0717 GMT (2:17 a.m. EST)
      About 24 megabits of data is being played back from Odyssey. It will take about 12 minutes to get all the information, officials report. This will contain engineering data on the rover's systems and possibly some pictures."


      assume this was a typo and they meant 24 megabytes. that would only put the transfer rate at about 17kbps

      if they really meant 24 megabits of data, than i'm afraid the transfer rate is considerably less than that.

    7. Re:Colour calibration? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Why not? The thing is a few million miles away...

      It may not be able to reliably transmit data particularly fast, especially if they used a low frequency signal.

    8. Re:Colour calibration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      24 megabits per second is probably a typo. It probably should have been 24 KILO bits per second.

      Source:
      http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc20 03/pdf/1919 .pdf

      [snip]
      As the Earth-Mars distance decreases, the maximum downlink data rate has become available, which for Odyssey is 110 kbits/sec. This rate will be utilized on 70 m Deep Space Network stations until early 2004.
      [/snip]

    9. Re:Colour calibration? by jerde · · Score: 1

      It was indeed only megabits. So with 25Mb, the first batch of data they received was just over 3MB of data. The transmission rate was about 4kB/s. Not bad for a 300 million mile distance. Some of NASAs first probes sent back their pictures and data at 170 bits per second. Those were some patient scientists.

      This was not using Spirit's high-gain antenna, however -- and was not communicated directly to earth. The first data was received by Mars Global Surveyor as it flew over the rover, and relayed to us, since the rover was on the "far side" of Mars at the time.

      I think the high-gain antenna will be deployed and set up some time tonight. Then we get the "fire hose" of data they mentioned.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
  6. Hey! by twoslice · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I see Beagle2! - or what's left of it.....

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course this is a troll and the parent isn't.

    2. Re:Hey! by tsa · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can laugh about it but that's not really fair. I think the Beagle2 was just unlucky. Congrats to NASA for this achievement of course, but I don't think it feels good to be a Beagle2 team member just now. O well, wait till they find Beagle2 and it sends back images of living martians from the bottom of the chasm it fell in!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god. I know what tsa's toilet looks like.

    4. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lame joke that has been made a million times before.

      I think I see twoslice's creativity! - or what's left of it.....

    5. Re:Hey! by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

      I think most of us are in agreement that it's sad the Beagle 2 didn't make it. That being said, does anyone know how far Spirit and the landing site of the Beagle 2 are? I'm just guessing, but probably waaaaay to far for the rover to take a gander at what might have happened to the Beagle 2.

      --
      Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    6. Re:Hey! by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't matter anyway, it is doubtful that spirit could get out of the gusev crater :(

      It would be cool though :)

      --Joey

    7. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are having an inferioriy complex (and a well earned one, at that) induced hissy fit.

    8. Re:Hey! by Brane2 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it got shot down by Martian AAA fire...

    9. Re:Hey! by Basehart · · Score: 1

      ASA

    10. Re:Hey! by kevlar · · Score: 1

      ....and when the other rover touches down without problems on the 24th... will that still be luck?

      The fact of the matter is that its science. When something fails its mission, its not due to "luck", its due to miscalculation or a lack of information.

    11. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still some luck involved. Spirit seems to have landed right next to a big old rock. If it had come to a stop on top of the rock, then it could have ended up tilted, could have had problems with airbag retraction, rover deployment would probably have been trickier, etc...

      but yeah, the main reason spirit is doing so well is not luck, but good planning and good design (due to hard work and experience from past successes and failures.)

    12. Re:Hey! by kyletinsley · · Score: 1
      My guess is that it got shot down by Martian AAA fire...

      AAA fire? Why, did they not pay their roadside assistance membership fee for this year??

      Or do you mean Anti-Anti-Air fire? Sounds like something these Mars probes we're sending could use...
    13. Re:Hey! by barawn · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not true for Beagle 2, just like it wouldn't've been true had Pathfinder failed. It was an uncontrolled landing - there's a bit of luck involved in it. You pick a relatively clear area, and try to land there. Airbags deploy, you bounce, hopefully you don't nail something sharp and pointy enough to puncture the airbags, and hope you land somewhere where an antenna can deploy.

      Considering that Mars is a planet with an atmosphere, unlike the Moon, and with moderately variable air density, it can be a little bit difficult to predict exactly where something will land, so there's a measure of luck involved.

      Well, actually, there's a measure of luck in ALL of these landings, because it's remote, and your statement of "a lack of information" is correct - they ALWAYS have a lack of information about the landing sites. That's why we send the probes there. :)

    14. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Sneering comment like this show no appreciation of the difficulties involved, or the work people put in.

      Mars Express is working just fine, thanks.

      Beagle 2 was built on a shoestring budget, far, far less than NASA had for the (wonderful) rovers.

      ANY lander on Mars has to contend with factors like weather (Beagle 2 apparently came down during a duststorm), undetected obstacles such as large rocks, as well as failures within the lander itself.

      I might remind you that Mars Polar lander also failed completely, as did The Mars Climate mission, and others (including losses on the launch pad, failure to leave Earth orbit, etc).

      NASA has had its share of failures (as have others), as well as successes.

    15. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, yeah, because you were such a huge part of this success! The closest you got was paying taxes from your paycheck at the gas station, so be careful where you swing that "our" around.

    16. Re:Hey! by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      AAA == Anti-Aircraft Artillery.

      Whether space craft count as aircraft is another argument entirely.

      --
      lds

    17. Re:Hey! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > "a lack of information" is correct [...] That's why we send the probes there. :)

      Huh... The beautiful, simple truth usually wins out, but it isn't always the most obvious answer for some.

  7. Camera Details by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Details on the panoramic camera are available from Cornell. Check out the popup test image links which show the test shots they shot in the lab and at Cape Canaveral. They're pretty spectacular.

    1. Re:Camera Details by Brahmastra · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why are the Images Black & White? Is there any technical limitation preventing them from launching a colour image?

    2. Re:Camera Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, it's called "American engineering".

    3. Re:Camera Details by VertigoAce · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first color ones should be tonight. It sounded like they would be really high quality once they get the whole thing up and running.

    4. Re:Camera Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're pretty spectacular

      And what exactly is so spectacular about them?

    5. Re:Camera Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      hahah 400 million dollars and its BLACK AND WHITE ?

      i had no idea NASA was still using 1960's technology

  8. Re:OMG! by EpsCylonB · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're slashdotting a hundred million dollar mars rover!

    $400 million actually and yes that is just spirit.

  9. boy am I glad! by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am really glad that we waste billions of dollars on missions to Mars to find out exactly what we already knew... There's nearly nothing there.

    Way to go guys!

    Perhaps we should reserve those billions on aid to our own starving populations.

    Just a thought,

    1. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am really glad that we waste billions of dollars on missions to Mars to find out exactly what we already knew... There's nearly nothing there. Way to go guys! Perhaps we should reserve those billions on aid to our own starving populations."

      Why not divert the billions of dollars spent on WMD to aid the starving populations instead?

    2. Re:boy am I glad! by xsfo · · Score: 1

      Great idea! Let's start with a program of sterilization then euthanasia.

    3. Re:boy am I glad! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      The USA already as a food aid program. It is called foodstamps. All you have to do is fill out some paper work and apply.

      We spend billions per year on it.

    4. Re:boy am I glad! by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Why not divert the billions of dollars spent on WMD to aid the starving populations instead?<

      The Mars mission was to search for Iraq's WMDs that cannot be found on Earth.

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    5. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you're happy with the engagement ring set you bought on eBay, assclown.

    6. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      a food aid program....not. This is to encourage spending and help prop up farming. Foodstamps may look and act like aid, but they are not welfare, actually.

    7. Re:boy am I glad! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      If FS isn't a food aid program what is it?

      It is aid that provide food. It may have others effects, but it is a food aid program.

    8. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, how lame is buying an AMD Duron sticker on eBay? I think you're a very sick man that should get the chair for his perversion. I mean it's not like people like you can be cured anyway.

    9. Re:boy am I glad! by reallocate · · Score: 1

      It's a waste of time to divert any money to "aid the starving populations". It's like buying heroin for a junkie. Yes, you need food if you're starving, but you also need help changing your culture, your economy and your government so you can feed yourself.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    10. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I'll say it again. Food Stamps are to provide incentive to spend money on food...this props up the farming and food industry.

      They were never meant to be welfare. This is another example of how the average American misunderstands welfare, etc.

      If someone gets free or reduced food as a result, fine, but the goal and intent is to promote spending in that sector.

      You don't have to be indigent to qualify for and receive food stamps. You do have to be down and out to receive aid and subsistance.

      To quote the Food Stamp Act of 1964:

      "To strengthen the agricultural economy; to help to achieve a fuller and more effective use of food abundances; to provide for improved levels of nutrition among low-income households through a cooperative Federal-State program of food assistance to be operated through normal channels of trade; and for other purposes."

    11. Re:boy am I glad! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Try reading the parent post. It said "Perhaps we should reserve those billions on aid to our own starving populations." I pointed out we do spend billions to aid our population.

      Not one did I use the word welfare.

    12. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      And not once did I specifically credit you with using the word either.

      I hope you now have a better understand of how/why food stamps work.

    13. Re:boy am I glad! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I had a complete understand of the way the FS program worked before I posted.

      That doesn't change the fact the the FS program is a FOOD AID program. Using your logic, NASA missions aren't about space/science because they money is spent on earth.

    14. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not my logic. Read the act instead of being defensive.

      Bad way to admit you were wrong, by arguing with the text of the original document. You're being childish now. Shame you have to resist the point and the truth.

    15. Re:boy am I glad! by wjsteele · · Score: 3, Interesting


      First of all. $800M (for two rovers) is really inexpensive.

      Secondly, the science we gain is very important... and people like you, who can't see it, should go join those poor sobs who can't seem to feed themselves, let alone contribute to the rest of society.

      I would much rather pay for science (that helps everybody) than to waste my money trying to feed some poor slob who has no concept of how to even feed themselves - much less contribute.

      Lastly, each one of us here on this planet were born with exactly the same thing... NOTHING. We make our own world. If there is a problem with the one we currently have, then it is up to ourselves to change it. And before you say anything else, I know... I was born to a very poor household with a drug taking single parent. Once I realized how bad it was, I got out, started working two jobs and paid my own way through a local state college. I've worked my ass off to get to where I am at right now and I am very proud of that fact. I instill every bit of that in my daughter so that she also understands what it takes. You can't just sit by and have pitty on your own situation... you must do something about it.

      Science allows us to expand our knowledge and understanding of the universe around us. Which makes our world a better place to live in. Social programs that "HELP" those in need only serve to support the status quo, they don't help it grow or make it any better. I'm not saying we don't need social programs... but rather we should only have social programs for those who can not care for themselves... like children, accident victims, sick and elderly.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    16. Re:boy am I glad! by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      HOW AM I WRONG?

      All I said was that the US spends billions of food aid. WE DO.

      Damn.

    17. Re:boy am I glad! by ajagci · · Score: 1

      I'll say it again. Food Stamps are to provide incentive to spend money on food...this props up the farming and food industry.

      They were never meant to be welfare. This is another example of how the average American misunderstands welfare, etc.


      Well, so food stamps are welfare--welfare for individual and corporate farmers. And, no, farmers need not be indigent to receive this kind of welfare. They also don't need to be indigent to receive their subsidies.

      (What about computer stamps and computer subsidies to strengthen that sector of the economy?)

    18. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You said food stamps were aid. Indirectly, yes. By design, no. Food stamps are farm subsidies. Not the same.

      Calm down :)

    19. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Subsidies and direct aid are one and the same, to many, yes. You think the farming community in America wants the rest of the world to know they're being propped up? No way.

      This is where the mistake in understanding is rooted. This is where so many Americans don't do their homework, and why we have the govt. we deserve.

      Aid is welfare, however, and is defined as charity. I give you a dollar and I never see anything from that effort.

      A subsidy assumes you will invest your windfall, and in turn support me by buying from me when it comes time to spend what I've just given you. That's capitalism, not charity.

      The Japanese car buyer subsidizes the American car market by paying double for a new Z in Tokyo. That's not charity, it's robbery :)

    20. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apperantly you have absolutly no idea of what exactly "NOTHING" is...

    21. Re:boy am I glad! by tsaler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's surprisingly funny considering some things I've seen from "that crowd" before. For example, an advertisement on NewsMax.com, a banner ad, said "SADDAM'S WEST NILE VIRUS," and I just thought to myself, "This can't be for real. They're not REALLY claiming that the mosquitos are in it with Saddam Hussein, are they?" But they were, and it was sad. So, I suppose if they claimed that Iraq had moved all its WMDs to Mars, the average American would flip out and start cursing about "them damn little green bastards" being terrorists and the like. I don't like it one bit, no sir.

    22. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC calls bullshit on you. FS are not just welfare for the rich, as you'd wish them to be.

      The other poster is correct.

    23. Re:boy am I glad! by fantastic · · Score: 1

      Most of the money spent on Nasa gets back into the economy somehow, most of it goes to pay for human engineering time, staff costs. Think about it for a minute...

    24. Re:boy am I glad! by Rostin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it is nice for you that (for whatever reason) you saw your way clear to work hard and go to college. Your ideas about poverty are a little simplistic. Only the "children, accident victims, and elderly" are unable to care for themselves? You'd probably tell someone with clinical depression to just "cheer up," too, because there is no evident reason for their unhappiness.

    25. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1
      Under communism, maybe. Under socialism, sure. Under capitalism, it's better known as take from the poor and give to the rich. And taking/giving under those circumstances is defined as 'subsidy'.

      :)

    26. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "to provide for improved levels of nutrition among low-income households..."

      haha... my ex-GF was on foodstamps while trying to get back on her feet. improved nutrition? yeah, $123/month would really improve my nutrition. And she bought ramen noodles, fake bacon bits for a little flavor, rice, butter, Sphagetti-O's and frozen pizzas. Luckily she had me to help pay her way.

    27. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Next time do what the diehard fs users do. Spend them at the PX, trade that food for cigarettes then trade those for booze and drink until you don't feel hungry :)

    28. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can get man gravy anywhere though Darren. In a pump dispenser, no less.

      It isn't as if you have a REASON to be a dick to the poor. Shitmunch.

    29. Re:boy am I glad! by criordan · · Score: 1

      Give a man a fish, you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and you can sell him fishing equipment.

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    30. Re:boy am I glad! by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      A.) You say, "My ideas about poverty are a little simplistic" without clarifying. I'm not sure what you mean by that, but I know when I have nothing. No Food, No House, No Medical Support and worst of all, no caring parent, I'd say that I know poverty pretty well. Not sure what else is required.

      B.) About the person with clinical depression, please, read my list again. It says "Children, Accident Victems, SICK and elderly." By me saying Sick, that includes those with mental or physical illnesses.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    31. Re:boy am I glad! by logophage · · Score: 3, Insightful
      with regard to poor slobs and the evilness of social programs: do you dislike social programs like the national highway system? or social programs like public education? or social programs like the national park system? or how about social programs like water distribution and sewage drainage? do you dislike social programs addressing the health and safety of the food we eat? or the efficacy and safety of the medicines we take? what about public funding of the postal service? or of libraries? do you think that publicly funded disaster relief programs are inherently bad? what about government-backed loan guarantees for small businesses? are soocial programs that fund the police or firemen wrong?

      do you not use any of these social programs? and is this what you teach your daughter?

    32. Re:boy am I glad! by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      They are subsidies for the farmers. They are aid for the recipient of the stamps.

      Idiot.

    33. Re:boy am I glad! by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Actually, those are exactly the kinds of programs that I support. The programs that help the world (or country) as a whole. The kinds that actually contribute to the success of a society.

      Again, supporting the space program is one of those "types" of programs that incourage growth in knowlege and understanding that make this world a better place. You've named several great examples of other programs that are just as valuable.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    34. Re:boy am I glad! by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      I love people like you. Your comment was just like a kid saying "Because." Without any kind of retort.

      You say, I don't know what "Nothing" is. So, what's your definition?

      I know that when I have no food, no home, no money or parents, that I don't have anything - which is my definition of nothing. I also knew that if I wanted somethign, that I'd have to work for it. We all (except the exeptions listed previously) have the ability to work. Some simply choose not too.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    35. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1
      Read the act. Just like a smile, you have to have someone to give it to, or it won't work, now will it.

      Genius.

    36. Re:boy am I glad! by logophage · · Score: 1

      hmm... none of those social programs i named are exculsively for "children, accident victims, sick and elderly" nor is NASA for that matter. also, how can you say we are born with NOTHING? we are not. we are born with parents who will care for us (unless unlucky). we are born in a society with public infrastructure (if we're lucky).

    37. Re:boy am I glad! by Loie · · Score: 1

      stereotypical idiot american view of poverty. i'd like to see you live in the middle of a famine-struck 3rd world country where poverty isn't about being a "poor slob". it sounds like you expect people in poverty to just go get a job, so they can make money, so they can buy food... in the real world (read: not america, you spoiled brat) it doesn't work that way. There IS no food. ANYWHERE. Doesn't matter how smart you are, or how much you "contribute" to your community or society or whatever...there's nothing to eat, period. You believe that anybody can "make [his] own world", which is pathetically naiive. You write this pity-story about how you "know poverty" and how hard your life has been... shut the fuck up. There are a lot of people in this world who live in places where there aren't two jobs or a local state college. Where there isn't a "household", single drug-addicted parent or not, because there aren't even any houses. So the next time you think your life has been "hard", think of the kid in Ethiopia who was born with AIDS, whose parents both died of said disease when he was two, and who hasn't had a -thing- to eat in a week. Then tell me the kind of life this "poor slob" is supposed to make for himself.

    38. Re:boy am I glad! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      billions of dollars on missions to Mars to find out exactly what we already knew... There's nearly nothing there.

      While I disagree with that view, it does make one think about other exploration options on Mars. There's some really odd things on Mars. For example, dark blotches that seem to cast tree-like shadows, "ice tunnels", "scratch marks", etc. can be seen from orbit. I would swear that some of those "ice tunnels" look translucent in some images I have seen (although it could just be a trick of light and shadow). They are truly conspiracy-inspiring. How can something as wide as a football field be translucent? MarsMac :-)

      Instead, flat landing sites are selected to reduce landing risk. Someday we may get to see what those oddities really are.

    39. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    40. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for the night.
      Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

    41. Re:boy am I glad! by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Dumping money and resources on 'starving populations' is worse than just a waste of money.

      When cargo containers full of grain are dumped in a third world country, it destroys their economy. If anybody was growing wheat or corn, now they'll get NOTHING for their work, because it's now not worth harvesting.

      'Foreign aid' programs create dependencies where they didn't exist before, and they destroy local economies. It's not surprising that big companies in the US, who might someday like to own all that land, don't mind it if the peasant farmers are driven off their land, to relief centers in the cities.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    42. Re:boy am I glad! by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      NewsMax has just the same kind of nutcases on it as sites like Democraticunderground and that rant center from the WELL hosted on Salon (is it still there?). They just paint their stripes the other way.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    43. Re:boy am I glad! by iron_weasel · · Score: 1

      NOTHING???

      Well genetics counts for sure and does make a difference and you appear to have inherited the gene for
      'reckless ranting'.

    44. Re:boy am I glad! by Temporal · · Score: 1

      If not for the money we "wasted" going to the moon a few decades ago, you very well might not have had a computer with which to post that comment.

    45. Re:boy am I glad! by ajagci · · Score: 1

      A subsidy assumes you will invest your windfall, and in turn support me by buying from me when it comes time to spend what I've just given you. That's capitalism, not charity.

      Product subsidies are government interference in the market. They are contrary to both capitalism and free markets.

      No, product subsidies are not "charity"; "political corruption" would be a better term for them, in particular when it comes to farm subsidies.

      You think the farming community in America wants the rest of the world to know they're being propped up? No way.

      The rest of the world already knows--they'd have to be blind and deaf not to know: American agricultural subsidies are driving farmers around the world out of business and preventing other nations from developing.

      It's Americans that still cling to idyllic but inaccurate notions that US farming has anything to do anymore with either capitalism or tradition. And population poor but powerful agricultural states just love to create that impression--it pays out handsomely for the land owners there.

    46. Re:boy am I glad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all this is my problem because...?

    47. Re:boy am I glad! by Kenrod · · Score: 1

      You act like we filled a suitcase with $800 million and sent that to Mars. No, all that money went into the pockets of engineers, clerks, managers, and mfg workers. It also went into hardware, software, facilities, and services. Yes, there's some inherent bureaucratic inefficiency (as with any govt program), but for the most part that $800 million was spent just like with any capitalistic endeavor, only the ROI isn't necessarily cash profit, but knowledge. So get back in your cage.

      --
      Good heavens Miss Sakamoto - you're beautiful!
    48. Re:boy am I glad! by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Don't go crying to me about their problems, if there is no food where they live, then they should do something about it. Like move to where the food is. (I hear there is a lot of food in the green parts of the world.)

      Think about this. America was founded 200 years ago by a bunch of people who left their respective countries because of the situation they were in to make a better one.

      They did it themselves, there was no social programs to help them out. Everything they had, they had to build/grow/cultivate, etc.

      People have two legs/hands for a reason. We also have brains for a reason. It's a real shame that some people in this world can't figure that out.

      By the way, your Ethiopia kid needs all the help he can get. You seem to think that I don't care about him, but he is the one that I am really trying to save. By the way, that kid also needs to understand that when (and if) he is able, then he needs to get out and work too.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    49. Re:boy am I glad! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Similarly, our daughter just had a baby, and one could easily interpret this as her effort to prop up farming by adding one more mouth to the population. The government does encourage people forming families, and by blocking the disemmination of information about birth control, actively works to increase the population. I suppose this is also to encourage spending and help prop up farming, right?

      Of course, one could also argue that by funding NASA, the intent is to pay money to the people who work there so they will go out and spend it on food, thus propping up farming. And when you look at all the fuel that a Mars probe uses, it's obvious that their real goal is to subsidize the companies that make rocket fuel.

      Also, Social Security and Medicare are just to keep those old folks spending money on food and medicine, for the benefit of farmers and pharmaceutical companies.

      One of the basic problems here is thinking that people are only motivated by money. It seems fairly obvious that NASA and JPL did not come into existence as money-making operations. If you think that profit is the only motive possible, you won't ever understand why people support such things. Or why someone might support helping old folks, for that matter.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    50. Re:boy am I glad! by kyletinsley · · Score: 1
      There IS no food. ANYWHERE. Doesn't matter how smart you are, or how much you "contribute" to your community or society or whatever...there's nothing to eat, period.

      There's no food anywhere huh? Well obviously there WAS at some point for all of those billions of people to have moved to where they are in the first place. And now that there isn't any more food there, sounds like it's time to move somewhere else where you CAN grow food. Or figure out some new method of growing/raising food in that area. We have deserts in America too, we just don't live in them, asshole.

      There wouldn't be over a billion people starving if the previous generations couldn't have found some kind of food. They survived long enough to have more kids of their own, didn't they? The original parent post was explaining how A) he found himself in a bad situation as a young child and had the determination to take deliberate steps to improve his situation over many years. B) The poor starving slobs you talk about also found themselves in a bad situation, and in turn had children that they couldn't afford to feed or clothe.

      I say we try to promote more of type "A" people. If we just blindly continue to feed type "B" people, with no restrictions, with no insistance that they learn to try to improve their own situation for themselves, then we will only see the continued doubling of the starving population every couple decades. We (entire world) will eventually end up in a 'bad situation' where the "starving helpless" number so many that we can't physically feed them at all.

      And when the hundreds of millions are starving to death instead of tens of thousands, we'll have people like you to thank for your 'insight' in making it that way.
    51. Re:boy am I glad! by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Uh, it still doesn't change the fact that it is aid to those that receive it, no matter what the INTENTIONS of the act were.

      Moron.

    52. Re:boy am I glad! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Just like when your Mom changes your bed sheets...

      Dumb ass.

    53. Re:boy am I glad! by Loie · · Score: 1

      They survived long enough to have more kids of their own, didn't they? yes, idiot, a human being can survive on a cup or two of rice and water every day or so. I say we try to promote more of type "A" people. yeah, Ok Adolf. so, should we just...kill all the rest, then? Or perhaps sterilization would be more humane, because of course those pathetic losers have no right to pollute your superior gene pool, huh. And you're pretty damn stupid to think that these people can just "move" to wherever there's food, or that 'determination' makes a difference. You think they can hop in a Chevy and drive down the highway to Life Liberty and Happiness?...wow. As an american, you've been raised to believe that determination reaps rewards. you're just too naiive to realize that maybe life doesn't work that way elsewhere in the world. try living in third-world india for a while, "asshole". then, maybe, you can pretend to have an idea what you're talking about. Right now, you obviously don't. Example:And when the hundreds of millions are starving to death instead of tens of thousands, we'll have people like you to thank for your 'insight' in making it that way. There already are hundreds of millions, you fool. Tens of thousands?? Were you...kidding? Is that your 'insight'? and americans do live in deserts, moron. there's about a million of them in and around a little place called Pheonix. heh...you don't even know much about your own country, and you think you have a clue about the rest of the world? since you're too stupid to think that there's a difference between people in death valley USA and the middle-of-nowhere sahara, here's some hints: grocery stores...automobiles...irrigation...air conditioning...employment...the concept of money....need any more?

  10. Which desktop are they using in this image? by katz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which desktop (windows, kde, gnome, mac) is shown in this image?

    The leftmost titlebar button resembles MacOS9, but the rightmost buttons don't.
    (The image appears washed-out because it's a photo of a canvas.)

    1. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Ianoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      None of them. It's probably an X server with some lightweight window manager they've been using since the 80s.

    2. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by axxackall · · Score: 1

      I remember such buttons in two desktops: Gnome-1.4 and really old Sun's OpenLook.

      --

      Less is more !
    3. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, looks like a more or less generic X server, or perhaps Sun's CDE.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by k_stamour · · Score: 1

      Looks like CDE.... If I had to guess... ;)

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
    5. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's almost certainly Sun CDE. CDE is (or at least was) used fairly extensively within NASA, and they have a great deal of Sun iron. For kicks, see this Google search which provides a bit of evidence as to the use of CDE within NASA. Note that the word "cosmic" has been excluded from the search, because NASA once had a project called "Cosmic Dust Experiment" or - you guessed it - CDE!

      In any case, their environment is absolutely not Windows. Any number of choice quotes could be derived from this fact, not the least of which is, "When it's worth 400 million dollars, don't use Windows to keep track of it." If only the Fortune 500 were so savvy!

    6. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by axxackall · · Score: 1
      In any case, their environment is absolutely not Windows.

      If X Windows is not Windows then what is it? X Doors?

      X Windows is Windows, it's just not MS Windows.

      --

      Less is more !
    7. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by eurostar · · Score: 1

      this is cool: Flight Linux

    8. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, X Windows is not Windows because X Windows does not exist. Perhaps you're thinking of X or the X Window System?

    9. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by minkwe · · Score: 1

      Looks like Gnome 1.4 on RedHat 7.x

      --
      "Fighting terrorists with millitary might is like killing a mosquitor on your Dad's forehead with a rifle."
    10. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by minkwe · · Score: 1

      They are using the Cool Clean window manager theme which was default under redhat 7.x. Compare with this screenshot

      --
      "Fighting terrorists with millitary might is like killing a mosquitor on your Dad's forehead with a rifle."
    11. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Trurl · · Score: 1

      Yeah or maybe it's Gnome with the Simple theme, which is exactly what it looks like given the quality of the image.

      So the parent comment is insightful, or was it intended to be funny?

      You would honestly believe that the use-what-we-know-works attitude that NASA is famous for applies all the way down to the desktop of the guy doing image analysis?

    12. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows (with a capital W) generally refers to Microsoft Windows... I have no idea whether they have a trademark on the term or whether it's too generic.

      X Windows is what everbody seems to incorrectly call the X Windowing System. If you want to abbreviate, call it X, or call it by the name of the server actually being used, e.g. XFree.

      In the late 80s, when we said "it's using windows" with a small 'W', we'd mean it's using any WIMP (windows, icons, mouse & pointer) system, such as Mac OS, X, early MS Windows, whatever.

    13. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure what you mean. It could well be GNOME, but I would have thought an entire desktop environment would be slight overkill for machines that spend their days doing the same thing over and over again. These are work machines, after all, not home desktops. Also NASA is on a budget, and probably doesn't replace machines as frequently as you or I. Newer desktop environments choke on older hardware, but a basic X server with a lightweight window manager will work very well indeed.

    14. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      Pffff, this is NASA. Chances are they're using some supar-sekrat!!11 version of edlin developed during the Cold War.

      It's most likely a result of the text-editor race with the pinko commies.

    15. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong.

    16. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a robot that can't deal with natural language very well?

      No, no you are not.

      So then you know what people mean when they say 'X Windows', don't you?

      Yes, yes you do.

      They mean X, or the 'X Windows System' or XFree86 or other things.

      In conclusion, you are a pedantic fool.

    17. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by aallan · · Score: 1

      None of them. It's probably an X server with some lightweight window manager they've been using since the 80s.

      Looking at the desktop its some sort of NextStep clone, looks too lightweight to be WindowMaker, might be GNUStep or the like.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    18. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Or in NASAs case..

      XInsanelyExpensive

    19. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by hey · · Score: 1

      Doesn't NASA have the Not Invented Here Syndrome.
      So its probably a window manager they wrote.

    20. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      I agree it's CDE. On other pictures from the command center you can see they all have Sun keyboards and displays, too.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    21. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Which desktop (windows, kde, gnome, mac) is shown in this image?

      Reckon it's Motif. You kids are probably too young to remember it...

    22. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Maybe some of the hardware on this table may explain what they're using at JPL these days.

      Looks like three Apple laptops and one IBM Thinkpad.

      Certainly a far cry from the predominantly Windows based laptops predominant only four years ago! That reminds me, wasn't there a Windows Only directive at JPL in 2000?

    23. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Just that second they made a zoom on one of the desktops at the conrtrolroom and it showed not only the Maestro controlprogram but also nearly definetly a GNOME 1.4 Desktop complete with the panel and a Mozilla link inside it. Sadly I couldn't take a screenshot. Still I am quite sure they are using Gnome1.4.

      I hope for them that Maestro is run on a dedicated server since it sucks up a huge lot of memory, at least on my box. Java, after all! ;-)

      cu,
      Lispy

    24. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      GNUstep isn't a window manager. It's an API (an implementation of OpenStep/Cocoa). But the screenshot doesn't look very NeXT-ish to me anyway.

    25. Re:Which desktop are they using in this image? by minkwe · · Score: 1

      You are right, I was wrong. It is not the CoolClean theme but the CleanBig theme As shown here.

      I saw it on CNN and it was infact the clean big theme.

      --
      "Fighting terrorists with millitary might is like killing a mosquitor on your Dad's forehead with a rifle."
  11. Pictures by ajaf · · Score: 0, Troll

    So dificult is taking a good photograph in Mars? The first one seems to be filtered with photoshop.

    I like the picture of the crater ring, you can see the mouth and the eyes of the "happy face".

    --
    ajf
  12. Not so red planet by linux_user_31337 · · Score: 1

    What's really striking about the pictures from the rover is how red they're not. Apparently, the color calibration disk/marsdial is doing it's intended job!

    1. Re:Not so red planet by ptbob · · Score: 1

      Just wait, this was a black & white camera. The actual color is a rusty red. When the stereo camera on the rover is activated we'll have some great pictures, in color !! I can hardly wait.

  13. Better panaroma shot by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Better panaroma shot by danamania · · Score: 4, Informative

      And a higher again one here

      Easy enough to make if you download the polar shot here and apply photoshop's Polar coordinates filter.

    2. Re:Better panaroma shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's Death Valley!

    3. Re:Better panaroma shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA's pre-made press panorama wasn't good enough for me (obvious stitching lines), so I downlaoded all of their raw photos and used my own stitching utility (Canon Photostitch).

    4. Re:Better panaroma shot by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      Sorry to spoil the fun but mars looks really boring. i would've at least expected to see a mcdonalds. glad i'm not there.

  14. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could someone please tell NASA to upload some pictures at 1280X1024, I really need some new wallpaper.

    XP's rolling hills are starting to get old... although I could isolate the red channel and tell people it was pictures from Mars, but I digress.

  15. Those aren't the real pictures... by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are the real pictures: First Pictures. It should be noted that these are black and white and not color or false color, as the submitter may lead some to believe, to that magazine's tweaking of the original.

  16. Why is this no big deal now? by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 0, Troll

    In 1997, at least, I recall everyone with internet access rushing to the Mars Pathfinder site when it landed on Mars, and the rest going to people's houses with internet access to watch large images load up slowly on 14.4 (or, if you were lucky, 28.8) modems. We were fascinated to see that little robot go and take pictures of a rusty planet.

    Now, there's little talk of it, relatively little media coverage, and so on. People just shrug it off when they hear of it, and most laughingly hope it will fail because NASA didn't use significant figures in their calculations or something. It's not a big event anymore, and it's certainly not a moment like the moon landing.

    Only a few people seem to be following this, unfortunately. Interest in space has either dissipated or become extremely pessimistic. Kids now want to be members of G-UNIT, not astronauts. Hopefully, Spirit will find signs of life or at least water and change those perceptions around and re-ignite interest in the final frontier.

    1. Re:Why is this no big deal now? by Peyna · · Score: 1, Informative

      Stupid troll, this has been covered very well by CNN and other major media outlets.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Why is this no big deal now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you even trying to accomplish with all this karma you accumulate from reposting? I suppose nothing, you just have some fetish for being modded up by innocent victims, and for posts like this one. I imagine a good lawyer could wring out a few million dollars in damages from anti-slash.org with some dumbass jury due to its copyright infringement. I guess it is just ignorant moderators' fault that you get modded up in the first place. Oh well, repost on, trolls, repost on.

    3. Re:Why is this no big deal now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      in 1997 i had 512kb broadband AT home

    4. Re:Why is this no big deal now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you trying to accomplish accusing people of being repost trolls without any proof?

      do you have some fetish to see people get unfairly modded down?

    5. Re:Why is this no big deal now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking that thought a bit further, I remember when the Voyager probe finally reached Uranus and Neptune. PBS and CSPAN were providing endless live coverage of the feed as it was released from NASA.

      I would agree with you though that space is just not popular with America's youth. Not that is such a bad thing, as space travel for the masses is impossible.

  17. Nice Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We hurl the craft towards the planet millions of miles away on a gigantic explosive rocket, just so the robot can land and take pictures of itself. Sounds like my last vacation.

    1. Re:Nice Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, where do you go on vacation? Rocket? Well, I guess that beats the freeway.

    2. Re:Nice Work by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      For proper vacation photos, you need more people/objects to run through all the combinations and permutations: "Here's me. Here's Susan. Here's the dog. Here's me and Susan. Here's me and the dog..."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Nice Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget - "Here's the dog humping Susan while she sucks me off."

    4. Re:Nice Work by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      No, that would be the improper vacation photos.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  18. Full Images by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get the full quality version of these images and more here.

    Great stuff so far! The landscape seems a lot flatter than where Pathfinder landed.

  19. To all the NASA drivers: by twoslice · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Squyres said of the Gusev landing site. "It is a place that is almost, when you look at it, it looks like it was tailor made for our vehicle. Our vehicle was built to drive, our vehicle was built to explore.... We see rocks, we see enough rocks that we can do great science with them but not so many that they're going to get in our way. So we're going to be able to really motor around this place. So I'm looking forward to some good driving in the weeks and months ahead."

    That is exactly what the driver of the last mission to Mars said when he hung up the rover on a rock and got it stuck.

    I would hate to be the person who got the rover stuck on a rock with all those rocket scientists looking at me really steamed...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:To all the NASA drivers: by wombatmobile · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would hate to be the person who got the rover stuck...

      or the guy from AAA when NASA calls.
    2. Re:To all the NASA drivers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull. That never happened, you're talking nonsens, it just bumped into a rock, was 100% ok afterards

    3. Re:To all the NASA drivers: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I would hate to be the person who got the rover stuck...or the guy from AAA when NASA calls.

      No problem! AAA hijacked the Polar Lander and Beagle to answer tow calls.

  20. How come there is so many rocks? by jkcity · · Score: 0

    should'nt the dust storms have worn them down to sand by now?

    1. Re:How come there is so many rocks? by repetty · · Score: 1

      "should'nt the dust storms have worn them down to sand by now?"

      Or exposed them.

    2. Re:How come there is so many rocks? by jc42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, a number of Mars experts have already commented on this. The main explanation is that, though Mars does have all those dust storms, the atmosphere is quite thin compared to ours. It doesn't have the power to pick much up, and the storms are made up of rather fine powder. The effect is more like a slow polishing rather than the sand blasting that you get in Earthly deserts. It really would take billions of years to wear those rocks down to sand by such feeble storms. Come back when Mars is twice as old as it is now, and the rocks will be smaller and smoother. Except, of course, for the ones more recently scattered by impacts that haven't yet happened.

      I wonder if there's a NASA page with the numbers on this?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  21. Wait a sec... by twoslice · · Score: 1

    I thought Mars was red?

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Wait a sec... by axxackall · · Score: 1

      It is. But why did you decide that shot are made on Mars? It's made in Hollywood, in the same studio as 30 years ago made "documentary" about Moon.

      --

      Less is more !
    2. Re:Wait a sec... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      But why did you decide that shot are made on Mars? It's made in Hollywood, in the same studio as 30 years ago made "documentary" about Moon.

      attempting to change history by spreading misinformation is a tragedy. you should be ashamed of yourself.

      what's next? no jews were killed during ww2? there was no such thing as a berlin wall?

      you disgust me.

    3. Re:Wait a sec... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I suspect the humour went right over your head...

      Anyway it isn't that implausible to believe that the moon landings were faked - the US had a lot to gain by saying they'd beat the russians there, but comparitively little to gain by actually doing it.. Nobody could prove one way or the other, which is why it's still such a controversial subject even today.

      TBH I think they probably did actually go to the moon (the complete inability to repeat the exercise not withstanding). The evidence against isn't particularly persuasive.

    4. Re:Wait a sec... by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      What do you mean "probabaly"? Only a complete loon gives these crazy "it was faked on a sound stage" conspiracy theories any more credence than the fever inspired ravings of a brain dmaged LSD tripping baboon.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    5. Re:Wait a sec... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the humour went right over your head...
      yes, i understand that it could be looked at in a humorous manner, but i think you fail to see how much hard word and dedication it took for thousands of people to come together and make this kind of accomplishment.

      every single time the moon landings are brought up, some joker mentions that they're fake. next thing you know, an entire generation could get it in their heads that the landings aren't real, then there goes a very important piece of history.

      which is why it's still such a controversial subject even today.
      it's only controversial to those who haven't done any research, knows nothing of science (properties of space and gravity) and probably lacks the mental capacity (think double digits) to understand a scientific fact if it hit them in the head.

      oh, and just for fun, look at it this way:
      if the landings WERE faked, do you think thousands of people could keep it a secret? exactly.

    6. Re:Wait a sec... by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      which is why it's still such a controversial subject even today

      Yes, like the Evolution vs. Creationism 'controversy.' I guess some people find comfort in myth and conspiracy theories which don't require to much thinking.

      It's sad that in 2004 we are even still having these conversations.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    7. Re:Wait a sec... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of money to still be made peddling crap and conspiracy theories. It will continue indefinitely. There's a natural desire built into being human to use imagination as wildly as possible. Because of this there are shows like 'the X-Files' which encourage paranoid 'the system is a fraud' menadering.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    8. Re:Wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you tell what color it is from a black and white photo, I might ask.

  22. Digicrime.com by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Here is a space hack page from Digicrime.com.

    BTW: turn off java before going to his home page or he closes your browser!
    ps: If you use IE ... Don't go there!!!!!

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    1. Re:Digicrime.com by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1
      Uh, the Link

      http://www.digicrime.com/mars/

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  23. how come by relrelrel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    you can see the curvature of the planet so easily? it's as if mars is only a couple dozen miles in width.

    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    1. Re:how come by Ada_Rules · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are not seeing the curvature of the planet. You are seeing an effect of the wide angle lense that causes the picture to have a fish-eye like distortion.

      --
      --- Liberty in our Lifetime
    2. Re:how come by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More specifically, the effects of a lens that is under 50mm that is not being shot parallel to the ground.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    3. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This question comes up frequently with the whole moon landing skeptic/debunk arguments. In addition to Ada_Rules' comment, keep in mind that Mars' atmosphere is quite different from that of the Earth. The differences in atmospheric density, levels of sunlight, and the effects of those things on the refraction of light make for "distorted" images as viewed by eyes trained to see in Earth-perspective.

      Or, in layman's terms, "Objects on Mars may be further away than they appear."

      --
      Rate Naked People (not work-safe)

    4. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "More specifically, the effects of a lens that is under 50mm that is not being shot parallel to the ground."

      50mm is true only if it's a typical 35mm camera - which it's not. If that was the case, then yes, 50mm would be the "normal" perspective. With other sizes of cameras and optics, the "neutral" focal length will be different - not 50mm

    5. Re:how come by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

      Mars is only 1/16th of an inch wide but extremely spherical.

    6. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doh! completely right. in all likelihood we're not talking about a film camera that was sent to Mars, now are we? :)

    7. Re:how come by tmasssey · · Score: 1
      That's assuming that the sensor's format is 35mm, where a "normal" lens is 35mm. If the sensor is larger or smaller, the focal length of a normal lens is different...

      Yes, I'm also a photo geek. No, I can't help it.

    8. Re:how come by tmasssey · · Score: 1
      Err, that's supposed to be "where a 'normal' lens is *50*mm."

      That's what I get for nit-picking.

    9. Re:how come by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You are seeing the curvature of the planet.. It's the panorama image (full 360 degrees from multiple images) distorted into a polar (top-down) view.

      Why it looks so small is that the picture was taken close to, and parallel with, the ground. There may be other factors as well (image resolutions and image processing algorithms).

  24. BBC's take by relrelrel · · Score: 1
    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
  25. Poster is a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check his journal and previous posts. His links are goatse.

    probably a dupe post too.

    1. Re:Poster is a troll. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Parent poster is completly right tho. Pathfinder got a lot more attention. Probably because it did something totally new. It used a new bouncy landing trick and it had a little rover. This mission seems to be a larger version of Pathfinder. The only major difference is that the whole lander is mobile.

      Also the pathfinder mission seemed to be a lot more open. A lot of the realtime data was avaliable online. For example, during it's cruse to Mars you could watch the output from the various sensors. It was really quite cool in a geeky sorta way :)

      Anyways, it's only just landed. We'll see how it goes!

    2. Re:Poster is a troll. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      during it's cruse

      *hides from the APC*

    3. Re:Poster is a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent poster is completly right tho

      Dude, trolls and especially this troll are _never_ right.

      It's just part of his stupid little dumbass game he enjoys playing to get dupes like you to fall for it.

      Read his journal. He hides nothing.

    4. Re:Poster is a troll. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Read his journal. He hides nothing.

      Uh-oh, your right!

      Shame we can't send these people to Mars. Or better yet, Venus!

      Toasty!

  26. operators standing by for transmission by segment · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:operators standing by for transmission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why is that man wearing a tinfoil hat?

    2. Re:operators standing by for transmission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to block the martian mind beam you fool! do you know absolutely nothing of interplanetary exploration?

    3. Re:operators standing by for transmission by bedessen · · Score: 1
  27. All the images by Cee · · Score: 5, Informative
  28. This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!! by Lispy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was following the Nasa TV broadcast from Germany, meaning I had to get up at 5am. My girlfriend called me nuts. But I don't regret a single second. The six minutes landing phase was more stunning than any movie could ever be. I smoked chains when the signal disappeared. But now that I see the images I must say "Good work, Nasa!"

    I am eagerly looking forward to the landing of Opportunity and the rover mission. Still, I'm keeping my fingers crossed for ESAs Beagle2. Chances are we can pick up a signal these days using Mars Express Orbiter!

    The landing sequence for the MERs seemed quite complex and I was wondering if they were overdoing it! But I am deeply impressed now. Ever since I was a little boy I was dreaming about a real Rover on Mars and now I get two (hopefully). This is better than xmas! Thank you, Nasa! You rock! ;-))))

    Lispy

    1. Re:This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody needs to find this man some porn, THEN i'd like to see him claim this was better than any movie.

    2. Re:This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Lol. It was a long wait til the rovers arrived, mind you! ;-)

    3. Re:This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My girlfriend called me nuts.
      Be careful, mate. The last time me girlfriend called me nuts, me nuts forgot to answer. Then I didn't have a girlfriend anymore :(

      --
      Rate Naked People (not work-safe)
    4. Re:This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 minute is just about long enough for a handjob right? You could have blown your load when the good news was announced.

      And if the rover was lost, you were still getting stroked. Would have been a good morning for you either way.

    5. Re:This is a-w-e-s-o-m-e!! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      6 minute is just about long enough for a handjob right? You could have blown your load when the good news was announced.

      Now that's what I call "Rocket Science".

  29. Awe man... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    All that money and all that time and still got the picture of the backs of heads. Funny how these martians look like NASA geeks. Maybe if we flew in some babes and a couple cases of beer there really would be life on Mars.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Awe man... by paganizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really hate to do this to my poor little server, but if you still have your spy kids 3d glasses, and / or want to see the beginning of the latest "life on mars" craze, check out this page I just put up:

      http://www.changestorm.com/mars/

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Awe man... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean I'm not the only one who still has my Spy Kids 3D glasses?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    3. Re:Awe man... by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      Don't you have any .jps formatted photos for shutter glasses? There just aren't enough stereo photos on the net to justify having bought this video card. Thanks for the post anyway.

  30. alot more pictures here by Squeezer · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  31. Congratulations to the team by haggar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In case anyone of the NASA guys is reading /. (I know some are), I'd like to express my congratulations on an excellent job. I really enjoy following each step of the mission.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Congratulations to the team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah congrats NASA! I am real proud of you guys and gals. You worked hard, built a redundant unit just like in the old days when everything was done in pairs and made it happen in a historic way. This is the kind of thing we should have been doing a long time ago. I hope that this inspires congress to give you guys more funds to do bigger and better things.

      On a side note; mad props to the standards team for teaching everyone how to use that slide rule for metric conversion!

    2. Re:Congratulations to the team by mattkime · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe the success of this mission means that no one working on it reads slashdot.

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    3. Re:Congratulations to the team by dradler · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Perhaps a few read Slashdot, from time to time.

      Mark Adler
      Spirit Mission Manager

    4. Re:Congratulations to the team by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm at the flight control center right now...

      Say, can anyone here help us configure networking and re-modulate the antenna on one of these lander thingies? It's a very technical, intricate process that requires a lot of planning, so of course we here at NASA decided to Ask Slashdot instead of reading some boring manual. Thx d00d5!

      Sincerely,

      Bob Lazar
      Sewage Treatment Engineer
      NASA Flight Operations Center

    5. Re:Congratulations to the team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha...Bob Lazar...oh, that is hilarious

    6. Re:Congratulations to the team by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to point out that there where many other groups involved in producing MER aside from NASA, including scientists at Cornell (and elsewhere), engineers at Lockheed Martin and Ball Aerospace, and engineers and technicians at a variety of smaller contractors. Yes, the team was led by NASA/JPL, but it was composed of folks from all over the place.

    7. Re:Congratulations to the team by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Good job, sir.

    8. Re:Congratulations to the team by IM6100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just thought I'd add here that if you go to Mark Adler's web page, it mentions near the bottom that he's the coauthor of Info-Zip, Gzip, and zlib.

      Thank you.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    9. Re:Congratulations to the team by iron_weasel · · Score: 1

      So ok,, 6,000 contractors and 3 NASA people, one being O'Keefe.

      I say well done America!!

    10. Re:Congratulations to the team by hayesjaj · · Score: 1

      A truly fantastic achievement. NASA just got a seriously needed boost from this amazing work. Again, congrats to you and your team.

      --
      The world is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel.
  32. The blowups. by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    Click on the little red boxes where they magnify the image to full resolution. I think the most impressive shot is the cable hook which is on the far back wall inside the lab. The nominal shot shows some sort of shadow, the blowup shows the hook and the cable strands.

  33. why is it by relrelrel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    that NASA haven't set up their site DNS properly, if you go to http://nasa.gov it doesn't work, but http://www.nasa.gov does, strange.

    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    1. Re:why is it by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      if that was in any way "incorrect" then no page would ever exist with "www" in its name- required or not. Dumbass.
      Seriously, think about it.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:why is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Names like http://nasa.gov/ or http://slashdot.org/ are more hacks on the DNS system than correct settings. Format is usually http://host.domain.tld/ or http://host.subdomain.domain.tld/. Mapping an IP to the domain name is pretty unorthodox outside of the WWW reasons.

    3. Re:why is it by will12 · · Score: 1

      Give them a break they do rocket science, not DNS voodoo!

      --
      Peace, Freedom and Linux for all
    4. Re:why is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the web site is www. Its not an ecommerce site.

  34. Nerd Information about Mars Cameras by Danathar · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case anybody wants to know what resolution the cameras will be taking the photos at you can get the whole technical specs for the pan cameras at

    http://athena.cornell.edu/pdf/tb_pancam.pdf

    It's quite interesting actually. Real News for Nerds!

  35. Re:MOD PARENT UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a place run my mini hitlers

    You have mini Hitlers? Where did you buy them?

  36. Why so small? by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

    Tiny Mars..OR X-Box huge rover..place bets NOW!

    http://astrobio.net/articles/images/spirit_polar .j pg

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  37. Color Pictures by ironwill96 · · Score: 5, Informative

    People keep commenting on the black and white quality of these pictures. AFAIK, these are lower resolution black and white photos taken for initial analysis to keep the file sizes low. The nice color pictures we all want to see should be here later today (around 12:00 P.M. PST 3:00 P.M. EST). Overall, i'm impressed that we have once again gotten something on Mars without unit conversion issues or just plain bad luck. Now it could only be topped if our President (or the next one) would announce a manned mission to mars challenge, similar to the one issued by Kennedy to go to the moon in the 60s.

    --
    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
    1. Re:Color Pictures by secondsun · · Score: 1

      IIRC the Kennedy mission challenge was only taken in earnest after he was shot. One can only dream though.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    2. Re:Color Pictures by Atmchicago · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't really see the point of sending people to mars. What can they discover that the robots can't? Sure, they can say "Hey! It looks different and there is less gravity!," but we knew that anyway. It is far simpler to send robots. Sending people requires food, life support, oxygen etc., whereas a robot needs solar panels.

      The price and inconvenience of sending people far outways any reason to send people over there.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    3. Re:Color Pictures by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Sending people would be cool... I dunno, I don't find the idea that they spend billions for some low resolution images of sand that enthralling... now some bloke leaping up and down on the mars surface on my TV - *that* would be interesting.

    4. Re:Color Pictures by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Successfully have humans travel to Mars and back could be a huge boost to NASA PR. Robots and rovers simply don't gain as much attention from the average Joe. Relatively large parts of the world stood still when the first humans walked the moon, and most people I know where I live watched that landing. Can't exactly say the same about mechanical gizmos. These landings are lucky if they get good media coverage.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Color Pictures by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program."
      Larry niven

      That is why we should be working towards living on Mars, not just visiting.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    6. Re:Color Pictures by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And if NASA's mission was to provide the best entertainment value for the dollar what you say would make a lot of sense.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    7. Re:Color Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the reason that this rock we're on now is plummeting in terms of [b]life support[/b], and if we don't start cleaning shit up we're gonna need to split?

      Or the advantage of simply having our species on two different planets in the event of some natural catastrophe (read: Meteor)?

      No? How about simply continuing in the spirit of Marco Polo, Columbus, Magellan, Lewis and Clarke, all the people who said "Let's go check that stuff out over there?

      Are you still not convinced? That's ok, you don't make policy anyway. But I guess that's not suprising, since limited imagination and leadership don't mix well to begin with.

    8. Re:Color Pictures by glwtta · · Score: 1
      The point of a manned mission to Mars isn't necessarily learning something about Mars that robots couldn't, but rather working out better solutions than we currently have, to all the problems you listed.

      We are fairly sure that in the future we would like to have manned (womanned, whatever) space flight extending far beyond our current reach, as well as permanent stations, and eventually even settlements on some extra-terrestrial venue.

      So, what better place to "practice" as it were than Mars? The only way that the technologies for transportation and long term provision of food and life-support will improve is buy the active development of missions that use them.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    9. Re:Color Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said, dickhole.

    10. Re:Color Pictures by srleffler · · Score: 1
      Yes, but before we can contemplate sending humans to Mars we need a mission survival rate higher than one in three.

      A failed human mission to Mars would give extremely bad PR.

  38. MOD THIS GUY DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at his history. All he ever does is make stupid Slashdotting/Windoze jokes. I think ./ could get along without him very well.

  39. Yep, it's black and white by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's a big advantage to black and white - you get BOTH resolution and color. The initial shots are in black and white because they're checking out the camera and other parts.

    Later on, they'll calibrate the camera using the color wheel on the sundial (yep another old technology that works ) and you'll get full color images that are very crisp. The color images will be composite images that are built from 3 separate shots of the same scene looking through different colored lenses.

    Had they chosen instead to send a ccd that was wired like a digital camera, the images would have had 1/3rd the resolution they'll get this way.

  40. But the TRIP was 240 Million miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was launched back in July or so, the total trip being a quarter of a billion.

    You must have missed that part...

    M

    1. Re:But the TRIP was 240 Million miles by pointym5 · · Score: 1

      The intro says, "a quarter billion miles away". Maybe to you "away" means "distance travelled" and not "distance as the crow flies", but it doesn't to me.

    2. Re:But the TRIP was 240 Million miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the planets moving by no way did the probe go straight to mars. It's like traveling to another city, draw a line on the map and it says 60 miles. Hop in the car and you have to travel over 100 miles. If some one asks how far away you live do you say 60 miles away or 100?

    3. Re:But the TRIP was 240 Million miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know crows could fly to Mars - if so why all this fuss with expensive tin cans?

  41. I can't wait until the U.S. lands a human on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --then we can plant the flag and claim another celestial body for America! I'm looking forward to homesteading a vacation home on Mons Olympus.

    What do you mean, "We come in peace, for all Mankind"? That's hardly fair.

  42. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you please explain "auterco-feedback" or "vacuum malaise"?

    1. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Truth in Trolling Act of 1996 compels me to respond honestly. They are terms I made up spontaneously to give my OP an air of expert credibility to those willing to accept information as true based on presentation style alone.

      Sowwy :_(

    2. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, no, don't be sorry - good troll. Anything that includes the word "bubbleshield" sounds good. Lots of people didn't blink an eye and responded... of course, it did help that the pictures were fuzzy :-)

  43. Re:Take that EU by eurostar · · Score: 1

    looks like you have a very short memory:

    best bang for the buck

    take that, US...

  44. Re:Take that EU by oaf357 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shuttle program vs. No shuttle program. Pretty easy to not have any casualities when you don't put anyone in space.

  45. Re:Take that EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apart from the obvious fact that the parent article is flamebait, it may still be worth to put some things straight...

    The "European" mission was launched successfully on a Russian Sojuz-Fregat rocket. Thus far, the EU (mostly French and German, IIRC) made Mars Express is working flawlessly too. Only British Beagle 2, the arguably most challenging part of the mission, seems to have failed entirely.

    So, if you prefer your black-and-white world, note in the records that the "Anti-US" block delivered solid and successful work, whereas the "Pro-US" contributor failed.

  46. Wait for better pictures. by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    I used to go out with a girl who looked just like the one in that OSDN personals ad that keeps appearing on slashdot... I wish it would change....

    On a more OnTopic note I have to admit that all the fuss about the current set of pictures from Spirit are a little dissappointing although one or two of them do seem to have some unusual white looking patches (like frost) but we'll have to wait for some better quality ones to filter through before anyone can make any real analysis

    nick

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  47. Re:NOT 1/4 billion miles away (sheesh!) by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Ask your six-year-old kid if the planets move, and even he will know the answer.

    According to this Mars Fact Sheet, the maximum distance between Earth and Mars is nearly exactly 1/4 billion miles. And while we're probably not at the maximum, we're nowhere near the minimum anymore either.

    In six months, we move from one side of the sun to the exact opposite side.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  48. Why no Video or Sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted there may not be a lot of action on Mars but we don't we include a small video camera and microphone on the rovers to bring back the sounds of mars or to see the weather in motion?

  49. Too Bad... by BTWR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of Cornell, my professor at Cornell was the Rover's principal scientist Steve Squyres (great guy and perhaps the best professor I ever had there, by the way...). He said that at one point they had considered using radiactive power cells. That woulda made the rovers last like 6 years, not up to 6 months. The Viking Landers lived from like 1976 until like 1982. Imagine how far the rover coulda crawled in 6 years! I mean, someone do the math... it woulda been amazing. Oh well, glas-half-full-and-all, 6 months is infinately better than shattering in the atmosphere/rocks...

    1. Re:Too Bad... by MousePotato · · Score: 1

      Just curious... do you know why they opted not to use those kind of power cells?

    2. Re:Too Bad... by cheesybagel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because of the Greens. Such radioactive batteries use very radioactive short half-life elements like strontium-90.

      Remember all the noise the Greens made when Cassini was launched?

    3. Re:Too Bad... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They can aslso use Pu-238.

      But I think they should be using RTGs on the rovers, simply for the long life.

      Viking 1 lasted from July 1976 to November 15 1982

      "The Viking 1 Lander was named the Thomas Mutch Memorial Station in January 1982 in honor of the leader of the Viking imaging team. It operated until 13 November 1982 when a faulty command sent by ground control resulted in loss of contact."
      http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/Mas terCatalog? sc=1975-075C

      Viking 2 lasted from August 9 1976 to April 11 1980

      " The Viking 2 Lander operated on the surface for 1281 Mars days and was turned off on April 11, 1980 when its batteries failed."
      http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/Mast erCatalog? sc=1975-083C

    4. Re:Too Bad... by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 1


      You forgot to do the conversion. On Mars, the Greens are Reds.

    5. Re:Too Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The greens are generally reds here on earth too.

    6. Re:Too Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why they are commonly referred to as 'watermelons.'

      Green on the outside, red on the inside.

  50. Re:Take that EU by oaf357 · · Score: 1

    Never knew the war in Iraq had anything to do with space exploration.

  51. Re:When are Beagle pics coming in? by SamSim · · Score: 4, Funny

    We did get one message back from Beagle. "Probe yum yum... tastes like chicken. Send more probe"

  52. Re:Take that EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the hostile and down-the-nose tone of your first post about then?

  53. Hey, thats Nevada! by gobblez · · Score: 0

    They didn't wanna look like they messed up again...

  54. News Coverage by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it just me or does the media have an obsession with pretending there was a race between the US and Europe to land on Mars? The BBC certainly has!

    "US beats Europe to Mars" was the text they had onscreen at one point. Very annoying. I expected more from them. I really gotta stop doing that ....

    1. Re:News Coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if the US hadn't beaten eurpoe to Mars, they wouldn't have had to publish that, would they?

    2. Re:News Coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the scientific instruments come from Europe. The spirit should do de science, the trip to it is not important. Thanks for landing our instruments, but let us get back to the science now.

    3. Re:News Coverage by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      We got there first, but the US is the first to get there in one piece!

    4. Re:News Coverage by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > We got there first, but the US is the first to get there in one piece!

      For some reason, Tony Hoyle doesn't sound like a Russian name to me...

  55. Re:Take that EU by eurostar · · Score: 1

    Ok, try googling these great success stories then:

    Mars Polar Lander
    Mars Climate Orbiter
    Mars Observer
    Mariner 8
    Mariner 3

    so, still swaggering ?

  56. Yeah, but we don't really know... by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    ...if it's in the Gusev crater or if something else happened to it.

    Still it's a moot point since I'm sure there are thousands of miles of extremely rugged terrain between the two landing sites. :-(

    I wonder if NASA plans on sending a really rugged rover to Mars sometime in the near future? Something that could navigate some of those canyon bottoms etc.?

    It would probably have to be radiothermically powered instead of using solar cells, but it would be damn cool!!!!

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    1. Re:Yeah, but we don't really know... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      The next mars rover should be an SUV. It'd be great! NASA could just have a bunch of car companies design their entry, then NASA picks the best one, and ta-da! NASA saves several million dollars, and it's great advertising!

      Okay, I'm going to go think of another stupid idea...

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    2. Re:Yeah, but we don't really know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and the enviromentalist Martians could
      complain about Earthlings's sending
      their gas guzzlers to ruin their clean
      air.

    3. Re:Yeah, but we don't really know... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Earthlings's sending their gas guzzlers to ruin their clean air.

      Yeah, they have enough CO2 already!

  57. Re:NOT 1/4 billion miles away (sheesh!) by Iron+Sun · · Score: 1

    According to JPL's official calculation, Spirit (and presumably Mars) are currently 168,377,000 km away, or about 104,000,000 miles.

  58. Yeah because... by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Funny

    The landscape seems a lot flatter than where Pathfinder landed.

    This one was shot in a different studio.

  59. Yes, but... by shachart · · Score: 0, Troll

    For a mission that cost upwards of $200M, couldn't they mount something better than a webcam on Spirit?

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
  60. Budget? by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Now it could only be topped if our President (or the next one) would announce a manned mission to mars challenge, similar to the one issued by Kennedy to go to the moon in the 60s.

    Won't that cost money? I think this one already spent his budget sending WMDs to Earth.
  61. HIGH RESOLUTION Panoramic by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    High-Res Panoramic

    As mentioned before, there are a lot more images if you look here

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:HIGH RESOLUTION Panoramic by repetty · · Score: 1

      This is DEFINITELY not "high res".

  62. Oh Great another Spam gateway... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Floopjizzle enlargement patch!
    Martian meds without prescription!
    Martian sex tape!
    Make credits fast at home!
    Martian real estate cheap, move to Mars, instant weight loss.
    Martian calcium sand better than coral!
    University of Mars Diplomas FAST!
    Extended warantees on your rover!!!
    A letter to you from the Bank of Mars.
    Martian export minister needs your help.

  63. that's no studio... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that's South Dakota.

  64. Re:Take that EU by oaf357 · · Score: 1

    It was meant to be funny.

  65. Re:Take that EU by oaf357 · · Score: 1
    Seems you're a fine historian.

    So what was that date that the EU put a man on the moon? Maybe a man in orbit would be an easier one?

    You're splitting hairs here man. Don't take things so seriously.

  66. Battlebots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Opportunity lands and Beagle is still alive, they can play Battlebots!

    1. Re:Battlebots by SB9876 · · Score: 1

      Eh, seeing as how the Beagle 2 never had the ability to move, I think that your Pay-per-view money could be better spent on a more exciting match, say a snail steel cage match...

  67. more new images by jrivar59 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  68. 1116 x 328 version by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  69. Re:Take that EU by eurostar · · Score: 1

    perhaps you should think twice before sputtering silly trolls then.

    anyhow, we got up there first, in 1902
    man in the moon

    :-)

  70. Awww. Isn't that cute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wittle eurotrash is having another inferiority complex induced hissy fit. How cute.

    You can go back to your paedo-scat porn now.

    1. Re:Awww. Isn't that cute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer looking at the euro - dollar conversion rate ...asswipe.

    2. Re:Awww. Isn't that cute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you really don't get it do you? Note that all the important scientific hardware is European. Let us do the science and you do the transportation to Mars.

    3. Re:Awww. Isn't that cute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL - wrong direction, dimwit! Its usually the looser weenies, u know, those with the little ... brains and big complexes, that need to go "HA HA". So, thanks for outing yourself.

  71. umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US beat Europe to Mars in the 1960s. I can't see why it would make headlines in 2004!

    1. Re:umm.... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      The US beat Europe to Mars in the 1960s. I can't see why it would make headlines in 2004!

      This is what I was thinking! If it had been a race, it was over long ago.

  72. Oh, wait... by Xaroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    First panoramic images from Mars. I'm somehow let down by that. I guess I'd hoped for something more along the lines of:

    "We have failed to uphold Brannigan's Law. However I did make it with a hot alien babe. And in the end, is that not what man has dreamt of since first he looked up at the stars?"

    ...instead of just some pictures of some stupid rocks.

    Ah well. Maybe next time.

  73. Watered down official sites? by nazgul000 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone feel that JPL's official Mars rover site is a bit dumbed-down? Certainly it's more polished and professional than the 1997 Pathfinder site, but the Pathfinder site had a certain raw immediacy in their presentation, along with gigs of images and data seemingly straight from the downlink.

    Is NASA planning to make that kind of detailed information available over the web? Even the Astrobiology magazine site seems a bit on the terse side.

  74. Would require a "space race" by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Now it could only be topped if our President (or the next one) would announce a manned mission to mars challenge, similar to the one issued by Kennedy to go to the moon in the 60s.

    That could only be done if we (USA) were driven by competition. We won't be sending anyone to Mars until China has almost caught up to us technologically and has committed their full resources to sending a communist to mars.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Would require a "space race" by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Interesting
      We won't be sending anyone to Mars until China has almost caught up to us technologically and has committed their full resources to sending a communist to mars.

      By that time, they may already be ahead of us procedurally -- by that, I mean in their approach/attitude. On their very first manned mission, they've left behind a habitable module in orbit. Later missions will have the goal of docking with it (and perhaps adding to it?). i.e. they're already working on a space station, or at least the technology for it.

      This signifies the kind of long-term, methodical approach that the US program has really lacked. Yeah, we had our moon shot, but we didn't do it in anywhere near a sustainable way. And the Shuttle has been a long trek down the wrong path. By the time China has caught up technologically, and also in terms of manned-spaceflight experience, they may well have a continuously-occupied outpost on the moon.

      It'll be a bit difficult for the US to catch up to *that*. But we'll be able to take heart in the fact that no one can beat us at putting up military satellites.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  75. Looks like WindowMaker by zanderredux · · Score: 1

    But I cannot saw much more on the underlying OS...

  76. Re:Take that EU by oaf357 · · Score: 1
    "perhaps you should think twice before sputtering silly trolls then."

    Perhaps you should develop a sense of humor.

  77. when is the Begal 2 going to...... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    oh wait....

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  78. The Beagle Has Landed by gelfling · · Score: 1

    But I think it landed in Vegas.

    "Whatever happens here - stays here."

  79. This is 2004.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No color????? Cripes. How much did the damned thing cost and NO COLOR?

    1. Re:This is 2004.... by pribut · · Score: 1

      Color images are expected at the earliest late Sunday afternoon. There will be color. B&W was chosen for the initial images to conserve bandwidth for the initial pictures in order to make some quick early assessments of the vehicles health and condition.

    2. Re:This is 2004.... by repetty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "No color????? Cripes. How much did the damned thing cost and NO COLOR?"

      Funny. You have MTV expectations.

  80. OK. God is just screwing with us by JumperCable · · Score: 1
  81. The Press: They are who they are. by repetty · · Score: 1

    "I expected more from them [the news media]."

    For the life of me, I cannot fathom why you would expect that.

  82. More Raw Photos by iamghetto · · Score: 3, Informative

    All of the individual raw photos (which are clearer and in black & white) are available at:

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit. html

    Enjoy.

  83. Slashdotters on Mars by Elonka · · Score: 2, Funny
    Okay, now I'm curious. Considering the DVD with 3.5 million names that has also now landed safely on Mars, how many people from the Slashdot community (aside from myself) are now officially Martians?

    Elonka :)

    1. Re:Slashdotters on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would like to see the look on the Martians' face when they read the little print on the DVD saying "reverse engineering this would be in violation of the DMCA."

  84. Re:Take that EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your anti-US racist crap somewhere else please.

  85. Re:Take that EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racist? You need to look up the definition. Oh, and use a REAL dictionary, one that's at least older than the PC crap we're dealing with today. The definitions in today's dictionaries are WRONG.

  86. Re:Take that EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, apart from the Beagle, the EU mission is mainly show. Reminds me of Sputnik in '57. Mostly a PR stunt, no science being done there.

    I mean, congrats and all; welcome to 1957.

  87. Re:I can't wait until the U.S. lands a human on Ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather stay here at home and spend some quality time with a mons veneris.

  88. re: Solar Power and Duration by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    He said that at one point they had considered using radiactive power cells. That woulda made the rovers last like 6 years, not up to 6 months. The Viking Landers lived from like 1976 until like 1982. Imagine how far the rover coulda crawled in 6 years! [radio-active launch crash risk makes Nasa reluctant to use those]

    I wonder why solar-panelled probes cannot last longer. I have read hints that there are a few problems with them:

    1. Dust covering the panels over time
    2. Batteries lose ability to hold a charge over time, just like laptop batteries
    3. Solar panels corrode a bit from the sun over time
    4. Cold temperatures do funny things to batteries

    Couldn't some sort of pressurized air be used to clean dust from the panels? Sort of like those air cans used by some IT shops to clean keyboards? Being that the pressure is lighter on Mars, it may need less volume.

    Second, do they need batteries during the day if they have solar panels? I suppose that if the probe flipped over, there would be no battery power to right itself (if it even can right itself, I don't know if it has that ability). Also, perhaps it still needs batteries to store and send its data at night because there may not be a communications route available during some days. No bubble memory?

    I realize that a year+ down the road it wont be as powerful as day one, but I don't see why solar panels would limit a mission to only 6 months if there was a way to clean the panels.

    It would be interesting to see the technical analysis and tradeoffs on this issue.

  89. Worked your way out? by wurp · · Score: 1

    I started from a much less bad situation than yours, but still pretty tough... single mother, working hard at a factory job to support two kids and rent a trailer house, dependent on family support for pre-school child care, no family members (even extended family members) who had any college education. My mother was no addict. She certainly made some bad decisions, but not chronically, and not anything beyond what most everyone does. She just made them in circumstances that made life very hard, and after they were made there was no way out.

    Maybe the difference in our attitude is that your parent was an addict. They made chronicly bad decisions that screwed up their life. However, let me tell you, from someone who's seen the other side - life in a poor household with parents that didn't do anything horribly wrong - that people _need_ help. We have built a culture in which we don't live together with our extended family in one big house. Everyone is expected to go off on their own and support themselves and their dependents. When you're a single mother with no job skills other than being smart and having a good work ethic, with children who are below school age, you simply must have help to survive. What good is it to work two jobs when that just means you have to pay for child care for two children during your second job's working hours? Without familial support, we would probably have been out on the street, and not everyone has familial support.

    I had no examples of success through college around me. I'm pretty damned smart, well into the upper .1%, but if I hadn't gotten a full scholarship to college I probably wouldn't have gone. Even as a teenager I had no real feeling that college was going to get me into a different economic strata than my parents had been - I just had no basis for comparison that I could connect to. I didn't know how easily loans were available, or what to do to get them. A day a month with a good social worker could have corrected that. It could still correct that for a lot of people out there who are smart enough to do well in college and in an academic career but not smart enough to get a full scholarship or not emotionally connected enough to an academic career to understand the difference it could make for them. Government supplemented child care for poor people during work hours could make the difference between someone taking welfare and living out of a PO box and someone contributing to society.

    Intelligent support for the poor could be a huge boon to the country's productivity and the happiness and welfare of everyone, not just the poor directly affected. It really bothers me to see people argue against it, especially people who claim to have an in that puts weight behind the argument.

    1. Re:Worked your way out? by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Actually, I agree with you. I'm only against those social programs that are "unIntelligent." For example, I would have no problem giving your "single mother" a supplemental income to help out. I would, however, expect her to work and do her part. I would also expect that the father do his part as well. Weather he is present or not. Your single mother needs to take some responsibility, but so does the father of those children. That guy should be forced to work two jobs to make sure that his kids are fed, clothed, etc. if his single job can't. Remember, that that mother and father both have the opportunity to advance... weather they do it or not is up to them.

      Also, "Intelligent Support" programs are the ones that I consider to be productive in the end. Paying someone to stay home (while there kids in school) are not productive programs. But, paying for them to let their kids go to school, or have daycare while they work is productive in two ways. One, it gets the parent working and producing for society, and, two, the children see that hard working parent and have a good role model for their own development. Something sorely lacking in a lot of society today, good roll models.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  90. Cultural changes needed to end starvation ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Perhaps we should reserve those billions on aid to our own starving populations

    Cultural changes are needed to end starvation, not money. In some of our famine stricken regions if we feed the entire population we will merely have a much larger famine in a decade or two. Is that more or less humane? I don't know.

    Cultural changes are needed in some of these areas. No amount of charity can help. In some areas food is used as a weapon. A warlord's reward to the loyal, and hunger punishment to the opposition. In some areas traditional farming is no longer viable. In some areas overpopulation and birth control are a root cause. The problem is far more complicated than you suggest. The solution(s) even more so.

  91. Backseat driver by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Are the terms "backseat driver", "armchair general", "all talk, no action", etc. familiar in Western Europe? See if we take you along for any more rides, go build and pilot your own vehicle. Or perhaps you can buy a ride from the Russians.

  92. Re: Solar Power and Duration by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

    I would think that something this large(?) would require quite a few square feet (aww damnit, i meant meters!) of panels, not something you could just mount to the top of a mobile, thrashing around vehicle.
    on the other hand i dont see why they couldn't have some setup where the panels unroll on the ground (think of an overhead garage door). when the batteries start getting low the thing could find a nice flat place to lay the panels, start rolling forward while unrolling the panels out of the back onto the ground. and like you say, when rolling the pannels back into the rover dust them off with the compressed air. THe biggest problem is bringing all that compressed air from earth seeing as how mars doesn't have any ;)

  93. Re: Solar Power and Duration by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I would think that something this large(?) would require quite a few square feet (aww damnit, i meant meters!) of panels, not something you could just mount to the top of a mobile, thrashing around vehicle.

    But the rover does not move that fast. They could be tiny motors. Although Mars has less sun than Earth, lower gravity tends to balance that out.

    I was thinking that rather than compressed air to clean the panels, why not have a little robotic arm that dusts them off with a brush? Such an arm could also be handy for digging and poking for exploration, ungetting stuck, fixing loose parts, etc.

  94. its also semi-autonomous by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    one of the great advances of this rover is it is loaded with stereoscopic engineering cameras. Basically what this means is mission control gives the rover a location to go to, but the rover finds its own way there while avoiding things it would get hung up on.

    It takes its time doing it, only moving a foot or two at a time and then stopping to consider its next move, but considering the 20 minute relay time between mission control saying "go here" and the rover's camera showing whats going on to mission control, having a rover that can decide how it should go on its own is a great asset.

    --

    -

  95. Re:Take that EU by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

    Are we so sensitive that we cannot take a little good natured teasing from an old friend? Jeeze everyone is so touchy. Learn to laugh at yourself and not take everything so seriously. This is a great day for science, no matter what your nationality.

    And if you don't respond to flamebait, his stupid post would die in -1 obscurity.

    --
    There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
  96. I'm on stardust by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    I liked the stardust campaign a little better. Unlike being encoded onto a DVD like the mars lander, stardust microprinted the names onto metal plates affixed to the spacecraft. I suppose theres not much difference but in a million years you could put the plate under a microscope and read the names off, whereas the dvd format will be long gone...

    Since the spacecraft portion will continue flying throughout the solar system after returning to earth and dropping its lander off in 2006, the plates should last forever...

    --

    -

  97. Not much of a party planet by djtripp · · Score: 1

    But at least there are no neighbors to bug, unless Mercury aliens have really good hearing

    --
    "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    1. Re:Not much of a party planet by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > no neighbors to bug, unless Mercury aliens

      If Mercury & Mars are neighbors, Mercury & Earth must be in the same building... Wrong direction.

    2. Re:Not much of a party planet by djtripp · · Score: 1

      Boy, am I an idiot...

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    3. Re:Not much of a party planet by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > am I an idiot

      Nah, just more worried about the point of a joke than the specifics, which is fine. :) It's fine as long as the point gets across: it did.

  98. 3D Images by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    I have constructed a 3D stereoscopic image from a couple of the images I found. You'll have to wrangle with your eyes to get the effect but here it is in case you want to see. Interstingly enough the effect does sort-of increase the resolution, and gives you a better view of the rock in the background.

    http://www.blackapology.com/downloads/3d_rear.gi f

    have fun

    (if anyone else makes another 3d pic please post it under parent)

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  99. Well, the website sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The JPL site is completely unviewable if you're behind a firewall that doesn't let javascript through. Nor can one use lynx (to download the images).

    You'd think with all that money they could hire a webmaster who had half a clue that not everyone runs a Windows box with IE on it. :(

    Anyone know of other links which might actually work?

  100. Foreign Aid Stops Short, Sustains Status Quo by reallocate · · Score: 1

    >> ...It's not surprising that big companies in the US, who might someday like to own all that land, don't mind it if the peasant farmers are driven off their land...> 'Foreign aid' programs create dependencies where they didn't exist before, and they destroy local economies.

    Probably true, in some case, but not in others. The chain of dependency exists between corrupt and incompetent leaders and their "followers", who have been suckered into trading individual freedoms and prosperity for false pride in their leaders and their nation. (That's why it's called "nationalism".) What merit is there in taking pride in a country that is governed by criminals and fools who are making your life miserable?

    Foreign aid sustains that chain of dependency because it helps sustain the local status quo.

    It is right to give food to a starving man, but it is wrong to walk away and leave him in chains.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  101. Higher Still by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Heres one I did using GIMP its even higher resolution and the aspect ratio is correct (sun is round!)

    here

    Incase you missed my 3d picture that is as follows (cross your eyes!) but it has a better resolution.

    here

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  102. Finally answer a question... by minister+of+funk · · Score: 1

    What do the Leather Goddesses of Phobos look like?

  103. Some stereo 3D views I made. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 3, Interesting



    Enjoy.

    I tried submitting this as a story, but it was rejected.

    Hooray.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Some stereo 3D views I made. by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      good job packaging em up dude :)

      have you got any higer res versions?

      nick

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:Some stereo 3D views I made. by deathcloset · · Score: 1

      breathtaking...and a bit headache inducing ;)

      seriously though, fantastic.

      You really miss alot with 2d. The second to last image you can see the white JPL box (I assume is some central processing or signal routing unit..maybe it's a power junction). it looks very flat in 2d, but in 3d it jumps out at you and you can't help but think that a few months ago someone plugged those cables in, and now that plastic and metal is on mars! It's actually there right now!

      oooh, my eyes, my head..........I need those stereoscopic glasses.

  104. Mars Missions Breakdown by Cantus · · Score: 1
    Mars Missions
    Successes/Failures breakdown

    U.S. (Success: 67%)
    -Successes: 10 (Mariner 4 [64], Mariner 6 [69], Mariner 7 [69], Mariner 9 [71], Viking 1 [75], Viking 2 [75], Mars Global Surveyor [96], Mars Pathfinder [96], Mars Odyssey [01], Spirit [03])
    -Failures: 5 (Mariner 3 [64], Mariner 8 [71], Mars Observer [92], Mars Climate Orbiter [98], Mars Polar Lander/Deep Space 2 [99])

    U.S.S.R. (Success: 27%)
    -Successes: 4 (Mars 3 [71], Mars 5 [73], Mars 6 [73], Mars 7 [73])
    -Failures: 11 (Unnamed [60], Unnamed [60], Unnamed [62], Mars 1 [62], Unnamed [62], Zond 2 [64], Kosmos 419 [71], Mars 2 [71], Mars 4 [73], Phobos 1 [88], Phobos 2 [88])

    Russia (Success: 0%)
    -Failures: 1 (Mars 96 [96])

    Japan
    -To Be Determined: 1 (Nozomi (Planet-B) [98])

    E.U.
    -To Be Determined: 1 (Mars Express/Beagle 2 [03])

    Source: NASA

    1. Re:Mars Missions Breakdown by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > -To Be Determined: 1 (Mars Express/Beagle 2 [03])

      Not to be a downer or anything, but unless I've missed something, the result seems to be determined already.

  105. Prepare the Bittorrent Trackrs! Big pics bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get ready to download!

  106. The martians got the probe! by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    What are those creatures viewing the Rover from the top and scheming destruction plans in the polar view picture?. They're a step ahead of us!

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
  107. Of course... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Exactly right. You've simply highlighted my points that were left to the discerning reader to realize for themselves. We agree that politics and corruption are better labels...and why not, when something so dated seems to be happy on life-support, devoid of self esteem and redeeming market value.

    Farming is touted as the last icon of the American bootstrap spirit, when it's been nothing but a classic postcard for decades. Note the original Food Stamp Program was enacted in 1964. That's forty years ago...forty years since it was created to shell game farming from oblivion.

    American farmers are propped up, and everyone knows it, but as long as they pretend otherwise, they can continue to hold onto their land and their way of life. No one is fooled, and everyone is willing to let it slide, for now.

  108. Looks familiar.... by ThusandSuch · · Score: 1

    Utah?

  109. AIR FORCE DENIES STORIES OF UFO CRASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seemed appropriate still...

    Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
    From: *Email address Deleted* (Jim Griffith)
    Subject: Breaking news story
    Date: Wed, 9 Jul 97 3:20:01 EDT (Just after the Mars Pathfinder landing...)

    AIR FORCE DENIES STORIES OF UFO CRASH

    Valles Marineris (MPI) - A spokesthing for Mars Air Force denounced as false rumors that an alien space craft crashed in the desert, outside of Ares Vallis on Friday. Appearing at a press conference today, General Rgrmrmy The Lesser, stated that "the object was, in fact, a harmless high-altitude weather balloon, not an alien spacecraft".

    The story broke late Friday night when a major stationed at nearby Ares Vallis Air Force Base contacted the Valles Marineris Daily Record with a story about a strange, balloon-shaped object which allegedly came down in the nearby desert, "bouncing" several times before coming to a stop, "deflating in a sudden explosion of alien gases". Minutes later, General Rgrmrmy The Lesser contacted the Daily Record telepathically to contradict the earlier report.

    General Rgrmrmy The Lesser stated that hysterical stories of a detachable vehicle roaming across the Martian desert were blatant fiction, provoked by incidences involving swamp gas. But the general public has been slow to accept the Air Force's explanation of recent events, preferring to speculate on the "other-worldly" nature of the crash debris. Conspiracy theorists have condemned Rgrmrmy's statements as evidence of "an obvious government cover-up", pointing out that Mars has no swamps.

  110. Re:Well, the website sucks. (Try this one) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Amazon page has some links to really good photos.

  111. Boring terrain by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does the terrain seem a lot more boring than that seen from previous landers? Many fewer and smaller rocks, no terrain features like gullies, etc.

    The problem is, unless that rover is going to rove a really long way, it looks like everywhere it goes it's going to see the same thing: flat sand with a few rocks. Where's the excitement going to be? Look, everybody, here are the latest pictures from Mars, and guess what, they look exactly the same as the ealier pictures.

    It looks to me like in the desire to find a nice "safe" landing spot they may have done too good a job, and found someplace so bland that the rover's ability to move will be useless.

    1. Re:Boring terrain by deathcloset · · Score: 1

      look at the middle of the desert in arizona compared to where the rover landed..notice any similarities?

      Both are pretty boring.

      But dig around in arizona and you find out that millions of years ago dinosaurs walked around and big ass insects were prevelant.

      Huge dragonflys, t-rex, and a catostrophic extinction level event: not so boring.

      The rover is a robot scientist, not a freaking action movie director.

      in a few years we might get that cool flying probe. It is expected to coast around snapping pics of the Valles Marineris canyon system, which is almost as deep as the grand canyon :P

      Those pics will be more "surface-level" cool.

      But unfortunately, for the time being, only those with imagination will be able to fully apprecieate these pictures with the awe they deserve.

    2. Re:Boring terrain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the terrain is awfully boring, but then again I don't think the aesthetics of the site were top priority for the planners -- they're looking for water and evidence of life, not Mars' most stunning canyon or romantic sunset.

    3. Re:Boring terrain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, the whole *point* of the area (Gusev Crater) being selected is that it's a suspected dried lake bed! Sediments in such a place are going to be flat, but the interesting stuff comes from seeing whether rocks and sediments were layed down in water. That, and any martian cacti or prairie dogs :).

      All the same, it would be great to touch down in the bottom of Valles Marineris (just possibly, there's enough air pressure for liquid water), or else to fly along canyons with a balloon.

      Especially with the uncertainty about Beagle 2, which has/d life-detection gear aboard, it's a pity that NASA hasn't equipped the rovers with some biodetection gear (although, maybe we'll see visual evidence). It's been 27 years since a lander (Viking 1/2) with life detection was last tried, which isn't exactly rushing rushing it :)

  112. I expect an answer in 100 years. by deathcloset · · Score: 1

    The most tantilizing thing about mars, to me, is the whole terraforming question.

    Governor Schwarzenegger and memory implanting aside, mars does seems to be a very fertile place for experimentation on a global scale.

    Now the question is; should we leave mars as sterile as we find it?

    or should we do as we do to most fertile places and set up a homestead?

    What kind of an ethical question is that I ask.

    Now, i've been told I should "always end your stories a sentence earlier" - but I can't help but speculate about the role mars is going to play in our future.

    What says we cant begin genetically designing flora and fauna for this new world. Or are we the species that likes to just plant the biological seed and see what happens?

    It's a held notion that isolation encourages evolution. Could 10 generations of martian-humans start to show some kind of trait difference?
    Would we even need to dabble in earths biology at all for life to be able to gain a foot hold on mars?

    This is the time to be alive, at the beggining of the story.

    I just wish I had a near-lightspeed craft to spend a month in so I could see what happens next century :D

  113. Re: Solar Power and Duration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't use compressed air to clear dust for the same reason fan blades get and stay dusty - there is a dead air layer. particles smaller than this layer's thickness don't move no matter how hard you blow.

  114. Moronic "news" story (Re:Hey!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Channel Ten news in Sydney, Australia, gave a quick morning report on the Spirit Lander (great pictures!), then concluded with a bitch about supposed "red faces" of the Mars Express team over at the ESA, because the Mars Express was "Lost in Space"! This is complete nonsense. Beagle 2 may (or may not) be lost but Mars Express is well and truly in orbit (albeit slightly different to what was planned).

    I can only surmise that either they don't know the difference between Beagle 2 and Mars Express, or that they are thinking of the Japanese spacecraft.

    It makes me glad that I can check the net instead of relying on TV "news".

  115. if it were that simple by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Read the 1964 act and debate the intent with the people that wrote it...

    I doubt they see it as surperflously as you do.

    No one here believes a simple public discussion can reflect one's in-depth attitudes...be a bit less cynical and a bit more open minded when adding your own, thanks.

  116. Kodak Moment by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

    I thought this would have been something from the "and-yet-another-Kodak-moment department" instead of the "isn't-that-special department"

    --
    This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  117. Re: Solar Power and Duration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! I always wondered about that.

  118. Laughter spoils martian AAA gunners' aim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spirit was targetted for vaporizing once it landed too, but the martian gunners' aim was spoiled and then they died from hysterics and knotted necks as soon as the lander started bouncing around crater walls and boulders like a demented kitten.

    Those bouncy airbags were a great idea, JPL!!!

    Next time also add drag chutes made from a pile of bras and nickers. Those martians gunners won't stand a chance.

  119. Get your story straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Speaking of Cornell, my professor at Cornell was the Rover's principal scientist Steve Squyres...

    This is slashdot. Your should have written:
    My cousin is the Mars Rover...

  120. 208 megapixels by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The rover camera software supports scans of 26K x 8K pixels. Thats what they mean by huge magnification capacity.

  121. That camera costed about 1.5 million and ..... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

    That camera costed about 1.5 million dollars to intigrate into that rover and look, it gives us a purple terrain, not a red one! http://astrobio.net/articles/images/first_light_ba nner.jpg

  122. Linux and Steve Squyres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the Nova show, I saw a tux sticker on his briefcase, did any one else ?

  123. Panoramas as QTVR by ncrossland · · Score: 1

    The Mars Explorer panoramas as QTVRs: www.nickcrossland.co.uk/portfolio/qtvr/mars/

  124. Yes by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    Most of the scientists I know tend to stick with what works (or even what doesn't work) when it comes to computer software. It is not so noticable for the MS Windows guys, as they are more or less forced to update due to buuild-in obsolence in MS products. However, many of the Unix people have ancient desktops.

    As a Unix quy myself, I have found nothing in Gnome or KDE that adds uitility over twm + Athena.