Domain: oralse.cx
Stories and comments across the archive that link to oralse.cx.
Comments · 126
-
Kittens!
Goatse! [goatse.ch]
-
Goatse!
Goatse![goatse.ch]
-
Re:Here's the Guys Explanation of his code
Here is his explanation
Yeah, right. There's no way you're tricking me into going to some page with a suspicious URL like that! -
Re:On the eternal flamewar and need for validation
-
HELLO!111HELL0!!!1111
I LiKE TEH INTAWREB[/a>
TIHS SITE IS s0000000 kyUUutueesday^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H OMG YOU fags like ^H yes!
ANYWAY GO TO TAHT SITE OR YUO ORE teh reatrded
pleazZZz kthxbye -
For the web-deficient
Domo-kun is a children's TV show character. The joke doesn't have anything to do with "fanboy," but rather with this well-known mangling of this image (safe for work).
-
Re:LINKY!
-
Re:Kids these days
-
Re:pictures
No no no - this thread is worthless without pictures of sex kittens!
Here you go: http://www.oralse.cx/ -
Re:Yes, but?
-
Poll Troll TollWhich is better?
Goat sex
Phone sex
Cybersex
Dolphin sex
Troll sex
Anal sex
Oral sex
Mare sexYour comment has too few characters per line (currently 8.4).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 8.4).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 8.4).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 8.4).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 8.4).Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 8.4).
-
Real, Instant HIV Prevention
When you're thinking of pussy, just think oralse.cx.
-
WARNING!!! GOATBABY.CX IN PARENT!!! WARNING!!!
-
WARNING!!! GOATBABY.CX IN PARENT!!! WARNING!!!
-
Slashdot and US-ASCII
Did you ever wonder why Slashdot only supports 7-bit ASCII, i.e. no extended ASCII, Unicode or ISO-8859 characters?
Because Slashdot is a wholly American and Patriot website, that's why.
Think about it! Do you want Slashdot to become a forum for terrorists, where they can freely discuss plans for taking away our freedom and killing our brave soldiers through HORRIBLE ACTS OF TERRORISM in their own language and the heathen Arabic script? Unicode, a system that enables terrorists worldwide to plan terrorist actions and communicate through the Internet. Though most try to cover it up, it is no secret to most IT-savvy Americans that Unicode development is partly funded by Al-Qaeda and partly by the French, dictator-supporting government.
There is none of that anti-social trash here. Slashdot supports only AMERICAN, PATRIOTIC CHARACTERS. Eurotrash, look out, because you can't use your fucking umlauts and ~'s here. We saved your sorry asses in World War II -- the least you can do is show some fucking respect and use our alphabet. Slashdot does not support your anti-American characters. 7-bit ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange) is commonly known as US-ASCII. This speaks for itself. The one and only choice for PATRIOTIC AMERICANS is US-ASCII, the STANDARD CODE for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I'm proud to be an American, and I'm PROUD be a member of this patriotic, American Slashdot community. I am not going to let freedom-hating terrorists plot evil plans on an American-owned, FREE SPEECH website.
Do not believe the terrorist propaganda lies.
Boycott Unicode -- it is a tool of terrorism.
USE ANYTHING OTHER THAN US-ASCII AND THE TERRORISTS HAVE ALREADY WON. -
Re:What The Internet Isn't:
I miss goatse guy too. Thanks god we still have Oralse.cx
-
Re:Feh
What's wrong with www.oralse.cx?
-
Re:IMPORTANT NOTICE, OFFTOPIC
http://www.oralse.cx/ is still there
-
Re:First Brett Glass 0wnz j00 post!
-
goat pr0n
-
Re:the list
Here he is,here's his sister and the family pets.
-
Re:Who needs spam when we have...
-
You kick puppies for fun, don't you?
What's wrong with a little pussy?
-
Re:Their new tactic
Err, while I know people are hesitant clicking sites that end in
.cx (and I'll probably be rated a troll by people who don't check the link) I remember finding the picture here. Not sure if it was before or after the Fark thing though.
http://www.oralse.cx/contrib/domokunkitty.jpg :sigh: Yes, it has "oral" in the link... it *is* safe! (Though someone browsing through your history log might not think so, but regardless.) -
first non GNAA post
-
Re:Searching on freenet?
Note, for the length of this post I am assuming that these index pages are human-maintained. It was a while since I last used freenet. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Does the fact that the indices are maintained by humans not create a form of bias in the network?
I'm going to play devil's advocate for a moment. Let's say I want to use freenet to distribute kitty porn.
Now, the index maintainer will not like this, and will refuse to allow the submission.
This leaves the index maintainer with having to draw a line, of where acceptable and unacceptable content lies, and effectively allows the supression of "evil" web pages, which is precisely what we want to prevent.
A machine of today has no potential for ethical judgement, and neither should it. Therefore, it is the prime method for creating an index that is completely unbiased.
This means that freenet today effectively does not provide completely anonymous free speech, unless you're willing to take the risk of distributing the key to your freesite out-of-band, via the web for example.
This, in essense, leaves me unable to post my kitty porn on freenet without exposing my identity.
(Substitute "kitty porn" with whatever you like or hate.) -
Re:The book in full
Oralse.cx isn't that bad.
-
frosty the snowman
pisses again?
does he succeed, and fly high like santa claus?
or does he fail and land in an indescribable sea of poop?
either way, find my ideas intriguing and subscribe to my newsletter -
WHAT IS A SIMONIKER??
-
WHAT THE FUCK IS A SIMONIKER? FP
-
what the FUCKING HELL is a Simoniker?
-
What the HELL is a simoniker?
-
What the FUCK is a simoniker?
-
Re:fp!!What the FUCK is a Simoniker ?
-
TROLL
-
TROLL
-
Re:omg
Well, there's this http://www.oralse.cx/
-
Years 10 of Goatse.cx!
-
WiMax Sminax!
-
Re:TomCat
Another word: GOATSEMAN
The Goatse Man will come for you with his razor. -
FUCK YOU, ASSTACO
The GOATSE MAN will see you now.
-
Stop! Stop Now!
They must stop this madness now!
Do you think I want children 'researching' oral sex, or discusting masturbation in a public library? It is completely evil!
If this doesn't go past, you will automatically start to see bums jacking off in libraries!
Or gay rings in public schools!
We Must Put a Stop to This!
This holy law must be passed! -
Re:Free BSD (not) Dying
It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard, Mike Dillon , and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.
Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.
Fact: *BSD is dying -
Re:Little explanation? I think there's enough.
It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard, Mike Dillon, and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.
Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.
Fact: *BSD is dying -
Re:This is just more proof that...
It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard, Mike Dillon, and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.
Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.
Fact: *BSD is dying -
I'm Trolling from a jet plane
Step 1: Link to goatse
Step 2.-1: In Soviet Russia all your first post are belong to beowulf cluster
Step 2: ???
Step 2.1: Point out that this story's already been posted
Step 2.2: Don't read article
Step 2.3: Become speling/grammer Nazi
Step 2.4: Focus on minor inconsistencies and ignore main point
Step 3: Profit
Step 4: (+5, Troll) I win!
Step 4.1: (-1, Informative) I win again!
Step 5: Submit to Slashdot as "How to Troll on Slashdot" -
Re:spam.kids.us? ads are off site links tooso they would have to disable any offsite links that are not going to *.kids.us.... and i assume that would include banner ads?
... and stuff such as this.so would there be kid-specific pop ups too?
... and kid-specific goatsee links too. -
Re:Better be quick..
Either Whinnie the Poo or this.
-
Re:I wonder...
right up there with www.oralse.cx... hint if your squimish dont go to that link.
-
Wow that was fast
But now, just look at this. How can people dare to put such sick and offensive contents on the Web. Disgusting!