Slashdot Mirror


How To Get Hired As An Open Source Developer

An anonymous reader writes "Todd Cranston-Cuebas, tech recruiter for Ticketmaster, offers insider tips and tricks for landing an open-source job -- or for recruiting new talent to your IT staff." Make yourself googleable.

351 comments

  1. Its rather simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just put it "willing to work for free" in your resume!

    1. Re:Its rather simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll work for free.. I just won't do what you want me to do. But that's okay, if you offer me some cash then we can talk.

    2. Re:Its rather simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats the only way anyone would hire you, go for it....

    3. Re:Its rather simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put it "willing to work for free" in your resume!

      Tried that. Didn't work. What is plan B?

    4. Re:Its rather simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > Just put it "willing to work for free" in your
      > > resume!

      > Tried that. Didn't work. What is plan B?

      I will pay you to work for you.

    5. Re:Its rather simple. by gallir · · Score: 2

      Free as beer or free as freedom? They just look for people who will work "free as beer", so be nice.

      --
      sgis ddo ekil t'nod i
    6. Re:Its rather simple. by jsse · · Score: 2

      My nephew really did put 'expected salary: $0' in his resume. He was serious, in view of the high unemployment rate here and he doesn't want to stay home for nothing.

      The interviewer really asked him: "Would you consider getting more for this job?" - you dream to hear that in the interview do you? XD

    7. Re:Its rather simple. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
      I've been offered jobs for no money. tomshardware.com offered me a "job" reviewing hardware for no pay.

      Me: What does the job pay?
      Them: Well we're small, so ... ... nothing.
      Me: Can I keep some of the hardware I review?
      Them: No, we want it.
      Me: Well I guess it would be still cool to see my name on the site, can you guys fedex me the hardware?
      Them: No, you have to pick it up.
      Me: Thats 150 miles each way, it was nice meetin ya! :D

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    8. Re:Its rather simple. by mark.scott · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the interviewer thought he was a true programmer that writes in code. Hmmm, except the sentence would probably read 'expected salary: resumé' after $0 was expanded to the program name.

  2. Eh? by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1
    OSS developers can be hired?

    I didn't know we could do that!

  3. Business Plan by The_Rippa · · Score: 1, Funny

    (and now for the obligatory /. business plan)

    1. Send Resume
    2. Wait Patiently
    3. Get job
    4. Profit???

    1. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) ???
      6) profit!!!!

      I know we can make this list longer, so just reply to this message and continue the list. Let's get this "joke" out of our systems once and for all!

      7) reply to this message
      8) ???
      9) profit!!!

    2. Re:Business Plan by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 3, Funny

      And be sure to link /. as a favorite technical website on you resume:

      Another thing is to include your favorite technical Web site list in your online resume or personal Web site. I'll look for people who specialize in a certain area -- if they also have a list of favorite Web sites that show their interest in the top Web sites in a certain area, I'll notice that.

      But then again, telling a potential employer that you read a lot of slashdot might not be a good thing :)

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    3. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here at Slashdot Labs, we don't just recycle news stories, we recycle comments from recycled news stories.

      Support America: put a flag on your terrorist-funding SUV!

    4. Re:Business Plan by killthiskid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No no no no... the missing step is make something of value! OSS can do that. The problem is extracting profit from it... if the software itself is free, then there must be a alternative, such as service and support.

    5. Re:Business Plan by shnarez · · Score: 2, Funny
      But then again, telling a potential employer that you read a lot of slashdot might not be a good thing :)
      Depends where you're applying for the job. For instance, if you're applying to Slashdot... oh, wait...
    6. Re:Business Plan by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You left out a key step. I revised it for you:

      1. Send Resume
      2. Wait Patiently
      3. Go to step 1
      4. Get job
      5. Profit!!!

    7. Re:Business Plan by Leeji · · Score: 2

      But then again, telling a potential employer that you read a lot of slashdot might not be a good thing :)

      Especially when your cover letter starts off, "Dear M$"

      --
      It all goes downhill from first post ...
    8. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. You suck
      7. This joke sucks
      8. Stop posting it
      9. because it's stupid
      10. Did I mention it also sucks?
      11. Oh, it seems I did
      12. It's right there
      13. step 7
      14. ???
      15. PROFIT!!!

    9. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most jokes suck. Why target this one to rant about?

  4. lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    Most of the companies around here create their applications to sell them.. even the bigger companies that need the application for themselves..

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    1. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by foistboinder · · Score: 2

      I just spent 4 months working on CFD software that will be freely available

    2. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would truly love to know where this misconception comes from. It is simply not true that MOST Software developers write code for thier company as a source of revenue, Many, Many compamies have software built for them that is so highly speicalized that it has no use to any one else, and is for internal use. Going to open source wouldn't hurt these compnaies in the slightest.

    3. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by fitten · · Score: 1

      ...and did you actually earn an income during this time? and if so, who was paying it?

    4. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it would hurt them badly. They paid engineers/programmers to build the software. Giving the source code away would let competitors take advantage of it.

    5. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by foistboinder · · Score: 2
      ...and did you actually earn an income during this time?

      Yes

      and if so, who was paying it?

      A large aerospace company

    6. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did you not read the part of the parent post that said the software is so specialized that it's of no use to anybody else?

      Why don't you try reading the post before you give your knee-jerk response?

    7. Re:lol.. .. open source is hireable..? by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the AC:
      Many, Many compamies have software built for them that is so highly speicalized that it has no use to any one else, and is for internal use. Going to open source wouldn't hurt these compnaies in the slightest.
      It certainly does have the potential to hurt those companies. Many companies view their software as a trade secret. For example, it may reveal things they track about customers that improve sales, or it may say a bit about how their distribution system works, or how they manage to keep their inventory turn quite as low as it is, etc. What's interesting about business software is what it reveals about the business -- things that humans often have to sign NDA's to even hear about. Giving the code away could equal giving away competitive advantage, for many organizations.
      --
      * Helen *
  5. work for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:work for google by ninkendo84 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Work at google

      Hmmmm... If only google was open source. Then maybe you would have a relevent comment.

      --

      $ make love
      make: don't know how to make love. Stop
    2. Re:work for google by jnana · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My question is: what is Google doing that requires a top security clearance: http://www.google.com/jobs/openings.html#deploy

    3. Re:work for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is: what is Google doing that requires a top security clearance: http://www.google.com/jobs/openings.html#deploy

      Prolly creating the search engine that will work upon the new homeland security database of every US citizen's spending habits.

    4. Re:work for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hope not. Google has an incredible reputation as an innovative company that is one of the few good companies out there. That will be forever tarnished if they assist the US government in spying on its own citizens.

      I for one will stop using Google if are willing to sell out just for a big government contract. I'm hearing good things about the new alta vista anyway, and perhaps it's time to look at teoma again.

    5. Re:work for google by Chexsum · · Score: 0

      You dont read Slashdot alot - do you? :P

      --
      Pixels keep you awake!
    6. Re:work for google by aat · · Score: 2

      For deploying google at defense or defense contractors' internal networks, seems likely.

    7. Re:work for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I read it every day. Has there been an article about Google and Total Information Awareness or something?

  6. does this happen? by mschoolbus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought the point of a company hiring you is so that they may make money off of you (i.e. What can you do for the company?).

    I understand there are some companies that can somehow make money off of you creating open source software for them, but does it really make sense to look for a job in which you create open-source software? I mean, isn't working about bringing in money at the end...?

    1. Re:does this happen? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I understand there are some companies that can somehow make money off of you creating open source software for them, but does it really make sense to look for a job in which you create open-source software? I mean, isn't working about bringing in money at the end...?

      I think the article was more about hiring people who know how to use open source software to solve problems. It might be about saving money at the end. As they say: "A penny saved is a penny earned".

    2. Re:does this happen? by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      you could think of it that way, or you could consider in a different light. if you can save the company $n dollars by extending an opensource program then it's worth it to the company. say for example company Y is thinking about buying proprietary software package P for $m dollars. now say there is a gpled alternative that could be adapted by hireing a programmer for $t. if $t $m then you would be saving the company $m-$t dollars.

      this is a very simplified example, but i think you get the point. this might not work for all software, but there is a large amount of free software available which can costs significantly less to adapt than the comerical alternatives.

      --
      -- john
    3. Re:does this happen? by blonde+rser · · Score: 2

      Remember the whole point of computers and software is a means to an end. The only reason there are companies that produce and sell software is other companies then use this software to generate wealth. The software itself is not wealth. (This may vary depending on your definition of wealth, which - despite the efforts of many - does not have a single definition.)

      The company that uses the software doesn't really care about who owns it cause it's not there business. Their business is generating wealth (or assisting others in generating wealth) so that they can skim their share.

      So then existence value comes into play. There are companies who, for a variety of reasons, will pay others not to do certain things to their land (ie not knocking down trees by a certain stretch of river). The paying company doesn't now own the land... nor do they want to. There is no value to them owning the land. All they own is the decision not to knock down those trees because those trees have an "existence value" to them. Well this can be extended to software as well. Since the company is not in the business of own or selling software they can get a way better deal in buying the decision that somebody develops it instead of buying the software.

    4. Re:does this happen? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Remember the whole point of computers and software is a means to an end. The only reason there are companies that produce and sell software is other companies then use this software to generate wealth."

      Yeah but by far most corporate software produced is not for sell. It is for use. So for most cases the only reason companies produce software is because they percieve a need for that software to do something for them. Thus, in the majority of cases, GPLed software is a free jumpstart. Since distribution in a non-issue, there is no problem with the GPL.

    5. Re:does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      if $t $m then you would be saving the company $m-$t dollars.

      Don't forget that Slashdot doesn't show less/greater than signs by default. Try aphersand lt; next time, & l t; without the spaces.

    6. Re:does this happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if $t $m then you would be saving the company $m-$t dollars.

      Don't forget that Slashdot doesn't show less/greater than signs by default. Try aphersand lt; next time, & l t; without the spaces.

      Don't forget that Slashdot doesn't show & l t; without the spaces signs by default. Try aphersand amp; next time to have < without the spaces.

    7. Re:does this happen? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I hope I see this mod in my metamod list...

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    8. Re:does this happen? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      if $t $m then you would be saving the company $m-$t dollars.
      Don't forget that Slashdot doesn't show less/greater than signs by default. Try aphersand lt; next time, & l t; without the spaces.
      Don't forget that Slashdot doesn't show & l t; without the spaces signs by default. Try aphersand amp; next time to have < without the spaces. Don't forget that Slashdot doesn't show ampersand amp; without the spaces signs by default. Try & next time to have &.

      Seriously, use &lt; for <.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    9. Re:does this happen? by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah but by far most corporate software produced is not for sell. It is for use. So for most cases the only reason companies produce software is because they percieve a need for that software to do something for them. Thus, in the majority of cases, GPLed software is a free jumpstart.

      Why would any company want to give a "free jumpstart" to its competitors?

      There might be a philosophical argument for Open Source, but I have yet (in almost 6 years of reading /.) to see a convincing economic argument.

    10. Re:does this happen? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      I assumed you were trolling and ignored your reply, but you've been modded up, so... at the expense of feeding a troll I respond: Yes, why would a company give a free jumpstart to its competitors? Strange that you would ask. Since most software is produced for internal use, how the hell would non-distributed software help a competitor who never sees it? So obviously you are building a "strawman" arguement to attack. Or you really don't understand. Developing from GPL-ed software for internal use would give their developers a jumpstart, and it would give their competitors as much of a jumpstart as the sourcecode for MS Windows has given its competitors. Both would be as visible.

  7. How To Get Hired As An Open Source Developer? by tshak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    +5 Funny

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  8. Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by dagg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Companies looking for open source skill sets are very focused on the proven abilities of the engineer in the work environment. In other words, if you can do it, you are the right candidate. With proprietary systems, like Microsoft technologies, there's a tendency to look at things like certifications as a prerequisite for hires. In the open source world, there are very few certifications that matter."

    My experience is this:

    • People without degrees will willingly hire people without degrees.
    • People with degrees usually hire only people with degrees.
    --
    Sex - Find It
    1. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by MattW · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That hasn't been my experience. My experience is that good managers who are knowledgable about the workforce will hire people without degrees. People who are poor managers and in over their heads are too afraid to hire non-degreed personnel because they feel it will reflect poorly on them. It's the HR equivalent of "no one ever got fired for buying Microsoft".

    2. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In part this is because (in the US anyways) people are raised believing that you're sent to school to get the degree so you can get a good job so you can get the pretty and vapid girl so...

      And it's just a farce. People that have succeeded, or seen someone else succeed without the degree will realise (generally) before people that've gone through the schooling and the job, and have the pretty and vapid girl, and are oblivious.

    3. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      so you can get the pretty and vapid girl so...

      Damn. I knew I messed up somewhere. My girl is absolutely brilliant but not so pretty and she is a pain in my ass. I was supposed to get the pretty and vapid girl. Oh well, that's why I don't believe in marriage. If at first you don't suceed, dump 'em and run.

    4. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      This has been my experience too. Good managers in IT know that having a degree isn't a requirement, or even particularly correlated to someone being a good IT person.

    5. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      Wrong... It is a meme, a degree is required because people think one is. I can guarantee without a degree you are headed for ruin. Maybe 1 out of 100 people makes it without a degree, but we all know he was just lucky.

      In this economy, even well educated, well trained and competent people are having trouble finding a job. I cant even imagine what someone without a degree is going through ...

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    6. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by El · · Score: 2
      People without degrees will willingly hire people without degrees.


      I've found just the opposite to be true. Oracle, headed by Larry Ellison, who never graduated, is obsessive about only hiring master's degrees from schools like MIT and Stanford. I beleive that Microsoft, headed by Mr. Bill who also never graduated, prefers degreed people as well. Of course, some of the brightest developers I've ever met never graduated.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    7. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by arkanes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm well educated, well trained, and competent. I also have no degree. I also have a good job. I must be that 1 on a hundred :/

    8. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's only a farce now because colleges and universities basically have you pay 10k a year to recap what you should have learned in public school. They've also taught the last generation or two that college is a 'place to party'.

      Like anything else, your time at a college/university can count as experience.

      This is what matters. BSc in Comp Sci is no match for 'BSc in Comp Sci, developed in house system for student management, president of computer science club, etc, etc'

      Then you have 4 years of experience, not 4 years of partying on mom and dads tab.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, some of the brightest developers I've ever met never graduated

      You've met Larry Ellison and Bill Gates!

    10. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by pbrammer · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think it's easier for a less educated person to get a job if they are motivated enough - comparitively speaking...

      Those that are well educated are less likely to go for trade jobs (masonary, construction, etc...) because of their degree. So this limits the number of jobs to those that require degrees - which is usually a corporation of some sort - which is (lately) going through staff reduction... Meanwhile, the trade industry is booming.

      So, I think if a less educated person is motivated enough they can find a trade job or something that doesn't require a formal degree. There are many jobs out there, but who is willing to work them?

    11. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your the one that got that job .... bastard!

    12. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by bitwiz · · Score: 0

      I disagree. I'm on my second programming job (been at current place almost five years, three years at the previous place) and both times I got hired by people with degrees even though I don't have one. There was also few job offers during this time that I refused. If you make it to the interview, degree doesn't matter. Skills, skills, skills. Don't forget those people skills too.

    13. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I also have a good job."

      For now.

    14. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And it's just a farce."

      Some college programs are just that.

      Others, actually teach you things you cannot learn any other way. Compare a humanities/general studies program with a BS in Physics.

      I have had the "career" and am now looking for ways to finish college -- Ultimately, I want to teach mathematics at the university level.

      In order to do that, I need a PhD in math. In order to do *THAT* I need to finish my undergrad work, which I'm still more than two years away from doing. Even though I have about $40k to work with, I don't know how I'm going to ever finish. It's not just a matter of going to school and making good grades. There's this whole food and shelter thing, plus the fact that school *really* takes a lot of work. Maybe there are liberal arts programs or business majors where you can drink and party and blow off and graduate in 3 or 4 years. But to do that in a degree plan where you need 40 semester hours of just math and physics? I don't see how *anybody* really accomplishes that.

    15. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by nigelc · · Score: 1
      A degree can get you through the door in some cases. As a hiring Manager (well, I would be if I had any reqs, but you know what I mean), every job posting I've written has some line in it like:

      BS in CS or 3-4 years experience in commercial software development

      So if you are starting off in the field and have little or no relevant experience, then I might use the presence or absence of a degree as an indicator of whether I will talk to you.
      OK, I might be missing out on hiring the next Bill Gates (imagine how wealthy he'd be if he'd finished his degree...) but that's a price I'm willing to pay.

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    16. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You are the exception my friend. I'm not saying I like it this way, but the US has a *HORRIBLE* case of credentialism. You can't disprove social trends :)

      This was the best thing I could find on short notice, but heres a link showing median income by education in farfax county virginia.

      I'm not saying you can't prosper without a degree -- first rule of science is you can't prove a negative. However, your chances are *much* greater with a college degree. In US Society right now a degree is what you need just to be let on the playing field.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    17. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      Hey ... I'll have you know I partied on my own tab thank you very much ....

    18. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And it's just a farce. People that have succeeded, or seen someone else succeed without the degree will realise (generally) before people that've gone through the schooling and the job, and have the pretty and vapid girl, and are oblivious.


      Come again?

      I think someone could benefit from an English Comp. 101 class. Just teasing, but those sentences make no sense.

      PS. it's realize with a Z.

    19. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

      That's odd, I don't remember Stastical Mechanics and Thermal Physics in high school.
      I don't remember a class in operating systems or compiler design in high school either.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    20. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anitra · · Score: 1

      ...graduate in 3 or 4 years. But to do that in a degree plan where you need 40 semester hours of just math and physics? I don't see how *anybody* really accomplishes that.

      Get someone else to pick up the tab (even if it's just loans) and do nothing but schoolwork.

      Even so, I'm graduating in 5...

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    21. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely true in my experience.

      The more degrees they have, the more they see them as necessary. It doesn't matter how good you are - they'll cut you off at the knees.

      Some of these people would turn down a top-level kernel hacker for a kernel hacking job if they lacked the right kind of degree. They're wearing blinders.

    22. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by tshak · · Score: 2

      We run an 80% Microsoft tech department and not one of us has a certification. Although certifications are a legitimate way of showing that you have a certain set of knowledge, it does not show the intelligence of a person. The same goes for CS types. It takes an intelligent person to truely take advantage of a college degree or certification.

      Anyway, my point is that just because we run "proprietary systems" doesn't mean that we look for certifications of those systems.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    23. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by tshak · · Score: 2

      The only time I've seen a good manager virtually require a degree (except for rare exception) is when the job requires a lot of math and CS theory (eg: biometric security in embedded systems with relatively slow hardware). This makes sense as this is more of a research position, and research is a very academic decipline, which IMHO requires a certain academic background. Although, we all know what kind of an academic background Einstien had.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    24. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by outsider007 · · Score: 2

      Yes so you should just put a degree on your resume even if you don't have one because:

      * People without degrees won't check because they're too slack to care
      * People with degrees won't check because doubting you would require 'thinking outside the box'

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    25. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      I got a twenty thousand dollar raise, thanks. :-)

    26. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My experience has been this:

      • People without Duby8'=w88754onQx87548754o8754mk=8km?
      • People with Duby8'=w88754onQx87548754o8754mk=8km!!!

    27. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      I'd hire someone without a degree if they had proven skills, but otherwise I'd lean towards the person with the degree - someone who has completed a university degree has generally learned a high degree of problem-solving and creative thinking. It's true my country anyway, can't speak for the thinking ability of US students.

      University marks themselves however are not an indicator of anything really unless you know how much work went into getting those marks - someone who studied for 3 hours and achieved 50% is probably better than someone who spent 3 weeks and achieved 70%.

    28. Re:Hiring with or without a degree... my thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Outsider,

      Putting false statements on a resume isn't thinking outside the box, it is unethical.

      It also means that you'd have to live a lie. I'm sure that at some point in your career, in conversation, you will have to mention something about your backround.

      You'd better be consistant with what you put on the resume. The odds are stacked against you. Like thieves, most liars eventually screw up and suffer the consequences.

      Most companies will fire people found to have lied on their resume. It's also a small world -- a world where people you worked with at one company may wind up working at another company with you later in life.

      If any of those people remembered that you were fired from company X because of a lie on the resume, it would come back to haunt you.

  9. Same as getting any job by BigGar' · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have skills applicable to the job and a few others that might come in handy.

    Be flexabile on salary, understand that pay has come down in a lot of markets.

    Interview well when it gets to that point.

    Get lucky.

    How is any of this different than getting any job?

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    1. Re:Same as getting any job by mrkitty · · Score: 1

      The pay rate is very true. I applied for and got a job for 43k that 3 years ago i could have gotten 60k+ for. The market is pretty bad in the computer world and people have to learn to deal until things turn around. Until then learn as much as you can, go back to school, etc....

      --
      Believe me, if I started murdering people, there would be none of you left.
    2. Re:Same as getting any job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be able to spell.. oh, wait, not that one...

    3. Re:Same as getting any job by klevin · · Score: 2

      Well, there were the points about participating in relevent mailing-lists/forums in a meaningful way and on making your resume show up in search engines such as Google.

      I personally found the suggestions on search engines helpful.

  10. Lucky me :-) by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know, I know, I have been extremely lucky :). Exactly one year ago, I was asked to join the internet team of a public broadcaster in the Netherlands. Their sites are based on the Open Source CMS mmbase. Of course, my work doesn't consist of 100% open-source programming, a lot of projects are more based around implementing the CMS for sites then on extending it. Nevertheless, I have been able to write significant bugfixes / applications that have been or will be released under an Open Source license.

    Please don't hurt me now :)

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
  11. How to get hired as an Open Source developer? by LittleDustPuppy · · Score: 1

    See TUX, he will help you. (For anyone who used to watch Kung Fu: The Legend Continues this might be amusing)

    --
    ~~{~~@ LDP @~~}~~
  12. No way by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wow, slashdot is really proving itself interesting tonight. I should get a subscription but student, no cash, blah de blah.

    This is almost psychic though. I was just talking to my flatmate (we both work for former ministry of defence research) whether it'd be possible to get a project code for my open source project and try and get a grant from the LinuxFund, the idea being that I could "bill" the Fund for my time working on the project. Often the fund gives out money and the projects don't really know what to do with it, I think the best use I can think of is to let me work on it fulltime.

    Of course, as Dan rightly pointed out, there are all sorts of ugly issues with that plan, noteably the overhead my company would charge, and the fact that they have a tendancy to eat IP for breakfast. Even though the project doesn't do anything that hasn't been done before, they might try to "own" the code, which wouldn't do any good at all.

    Still, I think I might talk to my boss about it tomorrow. I get paid jack all basically so I'd be able to make $1000 go a long way.....

    1. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to ask this, but .... why is your mate flat?

      Didn't want to do it -- felt it was necessary.

    2. Re:No way by Kragg · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I see from your resume that you say you're an extremely well-versed and competent cocksucker.
      Now, I've looked up your references but I always feel that there's no substitute for first hand experience. [Ziiiiiiiiiiiip] So if you wouldn't mind...

      --
      If you can't see this, click here to enable sigs.
  13. ResumeRank(tm)? by szquirrel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article:

    We create an index of all incoming resumes and search on keywords. That's why it's important for job-seekers to repeat the major skills multiple times in their resume.

    WTF is this? It's bad enough having to compete for a job with people who flat-out lie. Now am I going to lose out just because some dickhead spammed more buzzwords around his resume?

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
    1. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed... I just finished what I thought was a kick-ass resume, where I explictly removed multiple occurances of the same word.

      Why? Because it looks bad to the human eye "Apache this" and "Apache that" and "Apache thisotherthat" "Java this" "Java that" "Java something else", when you could say "This that thisotherthat Apache" and "Java this and that".

      Now I need to go back and put those keywords back in multiple times... arg!

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While that does sound bad...... In context it's a bit more understandable.

      He's talking about how he deals with a flood of 3000 resumes for a Support Tech position. Strategies for filtering out the folks who know nothing about computers and just applied because they thought they could fake it. Trying to get the pool down to a manageable level, that sort of thing.

    3. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by greechneb · · Score: 2
      could be worse, you could be competing with Bernard Shifman

      - He once sent our company mascot an email with his resume. Apparently he thought a mouse was in charge of human resources. Guess he thought we were disney.

    4. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Though this also might be a benefit (especially in better markets). If the company doesn't hire on decent people they're not going to succeed. They're not going to get good people keyword searching. And you don't *really* want to get hired on just so you can go job hunting again in a few months do you?

    5. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by zephc · · Score: 3, Funny

      avoid resumes such as:

      Programming Experience:
      - 68020, 030 Assembler (37 years)
      - Java development (15 years)

      Internet:
      - Website development (20 years)

      MCSE Certified

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    6. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is already too much bullshit in the resume world... and his strategy is simply asking for more bullshit.

      While it may seem like the screening process is simplified with these screening tools, in reality he's passing up many qualified candidates for people who plugin repeat certain keywords over and over again, with bullshit acting as the glue to connect words together.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    7. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by pclminion · · Score: 2
      WTF is this? It's bad enough having to compete for a job with people who flat-out lie. Now am I going to lose out just because some dickhead spammed more buzzwords around his resume?

      Dude, seriously... Don't sweat it. Why would you ever want to work at a company where recruitment and hiring is performed by a computer?

      In other words, if some stupid company hires Joe Blow because his resume contains six more occurrences of "PHP" than yours, do you really want to work there? Imagine what your new boss would be like...

    8. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by szquirrel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trying to get the pool down to a manageable level, that sort of thing.

      Then let him filter on a spelling/grammar check. That ought to prune out at least 50% of the chaff.

      Or maybe he should hire more HR staff if he really wants to find the right fits for such high profile positions.

      --
      Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
    9. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by nanop · · Score: 1
      Why would you ever want to work at a company where recruitment and hiring is performed by a computer?
      Which do you trust more: a computer or a pointy-haired boss?

      ... Now if we can get the computer to assign tasks to employees based on its large dictionary of acceptable buzzwords, we might have a middle-management coup on our hands.

    10. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Why? You could then get in good with those people who want "5 years experience in {Office,Windows} XP"!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    11. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by shoppa · · Score: 2
      While it may seem like the screening process is simplified with these screening tools, in reality he's passing up many qualified candidates for people who plugin repeat certain keywords over and over again

      Actually, "PC support" implies repeating the same things (retry Windows, reboot Windows, reinstall Windows) over and over again. So maybe repetition in the resume is a good thing!

    12. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a posting that wanted 4 years experience with Windows 2000. Says something about HR I think.

    13. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in parentheses written in tiny text it said:
      (time machine owners preferred)

    14. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which do you trust more: a computer or a pointy-haired boss?

      Which do you trust more: a PHB, or a computer operated by a PHB?

    15. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by jsse · · Score: 1

      MCSE Certified

      At least you are honest in the last line. This is more or less telling them "the line and above cannot be trust". :)

    16. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they probably meant 4 years NT experience, which includes NT/2K/XP

    17. Re:ResumeRank(tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which, in turn, says a lot about the company.

  14. Join The Anti-War On Everything Protest: +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Before the
    Cheney-Rumsfeld-Kissinger regime imposes martial law in the United States of America.

    For more information: see
    Get Your War On

    Cheers,
    Woot

    1. Re:Join The Anti-War On Everything Protest: +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a very cool comic strip. Thanks for the link.

  15. Ticketbastard by timothy_m_smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it almost funny to hear Ticketmaster being associated with free software since they provide a service that adds almost no value and charges a boatload. Good thing they are saving so much money on software systems.

    1. Re:Ticketbastard by MrEd · · Score: 2
      Right on. The best part is that they charge you a 'convenience fee' for ordering online... while saving money on operators!


      What a deal, eh?

      --

      Wah!

    2. Re:Ticketbastard by UdoKeir · · Score: 1

      It's funny, I drove the 20 miles downtown and double parked in order to buy concert tickets a while back. I still got charged a "convenience fee" although it was the venue's box office. WTF is that all about?

    3. Re:Ticketbastard by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please mod this up. Can people be so blind as to not see the value of his post? This is not about a company supporting the open source revolution. It is about a money grubbing, evil empire (that has made buying event tickets an absolute expensive nightmare) using freely available open source applications to save money and then hiring a full time open source employee so that they don't have to pay support fees to any of the companies/organizations creating the applications.

    4. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You see, it is that kind of perspective that will probably keep you in a low-paying techie job instead of becoming the next wunder-kid multi-billionaire. There obviously is value in the service that ticketmaster provides, and the founder(s) of the company saw that.

      So, if you don't like it, instead of bemoaning the service fees, services or lack thereof, do something about it! Create some comptetion by providing a superior product and bring them down. It's hard, but it is possible. I know. A small company I worked for brought down the largest, most dominant player company in it's industry. It was a lot of fun too!

      Most slashdotters love to complain about the so-called system. Why not take advantage of it instead? Make your self rich and do something you love and feel is right. That's what I plan to do.

    5. Re:Ticketbastard by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
      It's funny, I drove the 20 miles downtown and double parked in order to buy concert tickets a while back. I still got charged a "convenience fee" although it was the venue's box office. WTF is that all about?

      Well you didn't have to drive 25 miles did you? Just the 20, right? Sounds convenient to me...

    6. Re:Ticketbastard by Saige · · Score: 2

      Even worse is that they can't even keep their services working well. I've lost 8th row tickets because of their "you must check out in 5 minutes" rule when their website wouldn't work well enough to let me purchase the tickets in that allotted 5 minutes. Or even worse, getting on for a presale right when it starts, and being told "there are no more tickets available" while talking to other people who were purchasing tickets throughout the time it wouldn't find any for me.

      In other words, why take the advice of this person? What reason is there to believe they're not trying to find another way to make money off of doing nothing, and doing it badly?

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    7. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if that's what they do for the entertainment industry, just think of how they treat their employees...

    8. Re:Ticketbastard by senzafine · · Score: 1

      preach it brother!! not only did i pay a $6 service charge for every $16 ticket i purchased. this convenience charge was there even though i went to the ticketmaster at my local krogers.

      and i love when they have a presale and then they lock you out for having too many page views.

      i hate those guys!

      if only EVERY venue had a box office that sold tickets.

      --
      Better than Flickr - Manage, Share, Archive
    9. Re:Ticketbastard by chris_mahan · · Score: 2

      Which is why I don't go to concerts and therefore don't buy tickets.

      If people voted with their wallets instead of spewing filth upon the head of the filthy rich on geeky forums and then spending their hard-earned cash on tickets and convenience fees, they'd change their tune.

      Anyway: It's like saying the soup is salty and asking for seconds: mixed messages get you nowhere.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    10. Re:Ticketbastard by Soko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Creators of apps like Microsoft?

      Welcome to capitalism, and (for good or ill) one of the roles of OSS. How many times have you heard "RedHat is cheaper than Windows, so businesses should use it!!!", or worse, said that yourself? Don't like it when the other edge of the OSS sword swings around and hits you, eh?

      Since when does the GPL say "No money grubbing, evil monopolists allowed to install and use this software to further thier cause."? Oh, that's right, it doesn't - only rules about re-distribution. Hopefully 2.0 of the GPL will stomp out all monopolies, hunh?

      Grow up.

      Like it or not, we get the good with the bad. As "evil" as TicketMonster is, they _are_ forwarding our cause in a way that businesses understand - namley that OSS makes good business sense. I'll take that over a tin-foil hat any day, bud.

      Hell, maybe our way "of goodness and light" will rub off on them by association, making for a kinder and gentler monopolist. You just never know...

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    11. Re:Ticketbastard by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      But I'd rather have salty soup than starve to death. Similarly I'm not going to neglect a significant component (attending live performance) of a big part of my life (music) just because some shithead is charging $4.00 more than I think is reasonable.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    12. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for TicketMaster in a team of 10 or so programmers, and I can testify that we use a lot of open-source software, sometimes we modify it for internal use, but we never open-sourced a single line of code.

    13. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on.

      I once contracted at a company that was swallowed up by Ticketmaster.

      After giving up on hiring an experienced DBA, since they were willing to pay a maximum of $35k, (initial offers were $29) they ended up turning former call-center agents into technicians, and former technicians into DBA's.

      Needless to say, this results in problems. I recall hearing that over 10,000 customers are owed credits and about 25,000 transactions are either invalid and charged anyway or charged to credit cards multiple times.

    14. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some how I suspect that promoting Help Desk techs to DBAs has something to do with them using Linux and MySQL.

    15. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hopefully 2.0 of the GPL will stomp out all monopolies, hunh?


      Version 2.0 of the GPL has been available for eleven years. Your rant would be so much more credible if you displayed basic knowledge of the subject.
    16. Re:Ticketbastard by hacker · · Score: 2
      Welcome to capitalism, and (for good or ill) one of the roles of OSS. How many times have you heard "RedHat is cheaper than Windows, so businesses should use it!!!", or worse, said that yourself? Don't like it when the other edge of the OSS sword swings around and hits you, eh?

      I think you, like the rest of the media and masses who don't know enough about this environment, clearly missed the point..

      The point is NOT that it's free (as well as Free), or that they save money by using it... Go ahead, use it, save billions, that's the reason it exists, to improve the technology.

      The real point here is that they violate the SPIRIT of the license and community by NOT GIVING BACK to the community that helped them.

      Where are the fixes to the code they use?

      Where are the bug reports?

      What about patches?

      New features?

      Where's the "Thanks for saving us millions!" letters?

      Nothing. That's the point. We save thousands of companies billions of dollars a year, and we see less than 1/10th of a percent of fixes/bugs/patches back, and maybe one in 5,000 people actually care to say "Thanks". Now go back and re-read this book from the beginning, and stop skipping to the last page, you've clearly missed a lot.

    17. Re:Ticketbastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are totally uninformed about this. TicketMaster paid a salary to one of the mod_perl developers for an entire year so that he could work on porting to Apache 2. They also contributed great performance optimization patches to popular Perl projects like Template Toolkit. If you had made any effort at all to check, you would have seen a whole bunch of thank you messages for these things from open source developers on the relevant mailing lists.

  16. Google? by xchino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's the difference between sorting out 3,000 resumes and 3,000 irrelevant google links? Secondly, if someone is not actively seeking employment, then they are probably employed. Why not give the job to one of the thousands of highly qualified unemployed Open Source professionals? Seriously, it's like a geek can't get a break in this business ;)

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  17. Arg! You just 404'd my resume! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gee, thanks! I just submitted my resume for a job at one of the ticketmaster subsidiaries...

    My resume is now lost in a huge, even bigger then usual pile of resumes.

    404 - Career Not Found!

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  18. pssst... by jki · · Score: 4, Insightful
    offers insider tips and tricks for landing an open-source job -- or for recruiting new talent to your IT staff

    Here's a free insider tip, here's another.. do something to get noticed. A CV with something concrete in it looks much better than one without.

  19. Put up your resume in HTML and *Word* format? by no+parity · · Score: 1

    This guy isn't real, is he?

    1. Re:Put up your resume in HTML and *Word* format? by Brad+Wilson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, he's serious. I worked for a company that provided software for recruiters. Bar none, they were interested in Word format resumes ONLY. We took in plain text and HTML, and converted them to Word automatically, which at least gave you a chance (if you stuff converted well).

      Even when the world runs on the web, it's still hobbled by Word. :-p

    2. Re:Put up your resume in HTML and *Word* format? by ultraslacker · · Score: 1

      Should be HTML and PDF. I always like getting resumes in open office format, it shows that the applicant is at least using open source.

  20. Ticketmaster, huh? by X_Caffeine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does he have any tips on running the sort of monopoly that a company like Microsoft could actually take notes from?

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    1. Re:Ticketmaster, huh? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know. But the title of this is not called "How To Get Hired As An Open Source Developer and Still Keep Your Ethics". :-)

    2. Re:Ticketmaster, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How To Get Hired As An Open Source Developer and Still Keep Your Ethics

      Here is a paste of the entire book --

      Chapter One:

      No, hippie. No.

      The end.

  21. Much Easier by Black_Logic · · Score: 1

    If you're telling o-s programmers how to get jobs and their prospective employers how to find them (and they both end up reading the article) just skip all the advice and give them a street address of a mall they can get together at. :)

    --
    Ansi's and stupid tricks!
  22. Re:People who work for Free Source shouldnt get pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thats why it's open source, not "free source". Do you really think working for free would feed the programmers and their families? One of the biggest benefits of open source is diverse collaboration to create good, stable software.

    As far as I know, I never have, and never will equate "Open Source" to "Free". The fact that you get it for free, is just a benefit IMO.

  23. Sigh - #include by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess it's probably just a reflex action against spam-like resume submission (he cites 3000 applicants for a PC support tech), but I have to cringe that resumes get pre-processed by machine.

    Soon applicants will achieve homogeneity in resumes, devoid of any real persona...

    • PHP, 5 years experience
    • MySQL 6 years experience, senior project lead, architect
    • Apache 3.0pre9, principal developer, 9 years experience
    • .NET original architectural team, 15 years experience
    • Java2EE, 23 years experience
    • Linux kernel developer, 497 years experience
    • MCSE since 1954
    • SANS certified since 213 B.C.
    • CCNE since Cheops finished the pyramid
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Sigh - #include by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you are around 20-30 and seriously have this expirience then I gonna hire you for my company!

    2. Re:Sigh - #include by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, I've seen several job postings asking for rediculous stuff like "10 years Java experience"... from a Java shop, no less.

      Stupid...

    3. Re:Sigh - #include by jsse · · Score: 1

      I saw a sample resume like that in some funny resume site.

      That dude was hired, he applied for Mcdonald. They want some people with lively spirit as such. :)

    4. Re:Sigh - #include by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ....MCSE since 1954, SANS certified since 213 B.C., CCNE since Cheops finished the pyramid

      That may indeed get you past HR, but the hiring manager will then reject you fearing you are "too old".

    5. Re:Sigh - #include by richieb · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but that's in dog years...

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  24. I worked for Ticketmaster... by craenor · · Score: 1

    Amazingly, I've always felt that their website just wasn't that great. It's an ok website, but there are a lot better ones out there. Their in- house applications for ticketsales, scripting and phone use are top of the line.

    Ironically though, Ticketmaster owns one of the companies that I feel has the best websites available on the net...citysearch.com

    Craenor

  25. Muah comment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you don't need to beg for a job. Look at all the GNOME developers for example. Once they worked for free now they all got hired by Redhat or Ximian because companies are getting interested in the project and want to direct it's target. This can easily be done by hiring all the developers.

    so if you are an opensource programmer then don't worry. As soon as one of these retarded money sucking companies are getting interested in your product, they hire you!

  26. Right on! by KristsInferno · · Score: 1

    I did all of these things, and now I am a sucessful bookstore employee. Thanks Cranston-Cuebas!

    Do you think that maybe one of the reasons he got the 3000 was more due to the market flood?

    1. Re:Right on! by AJWM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you think that maybe one of the reasons he got the 3000 was more due to the market flood?

      That's part of it. And that number is probably low for this area (Denver -- lots of former telecom high tech workers on the streets, and most of the new jobs (Lockheed, Raytheon) require security clearances).

      Another part is that typically the unemployment insurance system tends to encourage it -- if you're required to make N job contacts per week, if there's only one or two that really match your skills you'll send out resumes to places you know you don't have a hope in hell of getting hired at just to meet your quota. (Of course, just responding to ads is one of the worst job-search strategies, but it's the one most people default to.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Right on! by klevin · · Score: 2

      Everyone I've talked to says this (responding to ads almost never works). The method, apparently, is to get work by having/developing contacts that have inside info on and/or influence over the hiring process. I can't say that they're wrong. The problem is what to do if you have no real contacts other than with the people you used to work with.

  27. As the job turns by satsuke · · Score: 2

    Imagine the deluge of resumes this recruiter is going to see .. solicited or not.

    My take on working full time in an open source role is ..

    Keep your skills current and relevent for the job market and interview as best you are able ..

    The fact that there might be a chance for open source evangelism or code contributions is secondary unless you are either independently wealthy or found some group that is.

    In this case, it's like my career. I was a Unix admin before the boom .. during and after. The tools change and improve but the basic requirements don't change.

    That is why you find people brought up on Dos or Linux having no particular problem getting around Windows .. no more so than going from Solaris to Red Hat Linux to Debian Linux .. the particulars are different but the skills required to understand what needs to be done do not vary very much.

    Which looks better on a resume

    Unix Administrator - 5 Years - Linux (several) Solaris, HPUX, AIX and others

    or

    Red Hat Linux Administrator - 5 years

  28. IT's easier than you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we've had little trouble finding work, even before we were listed as one of the "Top 10 Businesses of 2002"(tm) , on fuddle's search thingy.

    even more good gnus to come....

    (:>L0L

  29. Einstein of our time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    He solved it! The second to last option was "Get job" all along. Whoda thunk it?!?!?!!!!1

  30. Get a headhunter by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They'll do all the work for you, and (usually) get paid by the hiring company for finding you.

    This article is good advise if you want to work as a support tech at ticketmaster, but in my experience, a good headhunter is the only way to go.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Get a headhunter by geekoid · · Score: 2

      The "Employer pays" model of head hunting is something the boom created. Prior to that, the employee paid head-hunters.
      Expect the old model to return.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Get a headhunter by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      60 minutes did a thing on these supposed workshops for actors in Hollywood which are nothing but auditions you pay to attend. Surprisingly the out of work actors interviewed in the story didn't mind though.

    3. Re:Get a headhunter by clueless_penguin · · Score: 1
      The "Employer pays" model of head hunting is something the boom created. Prior to that, the employee paid head-hunters. Expect the old model to return.

      Ummm, no. I used employer paid head hunters long before the boom even thought about starting. They've been around for many decades. The first for me was during the last recession, and once more since then. The last was from DICE, which is also employer paid, but they're not quite a headhunter. No one should ever have to pay to find a professional level job.

      --
      Use the spatula, Luke
  31. oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    be a real man and write some proprietary software.

  32. My new resume by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
    This article has excellent advice for writing a resume in this age of Internet search engines. I've already rewritten mine. Here it is:

    Resume Resume Resume Resume Resume

    Java C Windows Windows Motivated C++ C SQL Teamwork C++ Perl C GDI C++ Perl Teamwork Windows Perl SQL SQL Motivated Windows GDI C++ Windows Self-Starter Perl C++ C C++ C++ GDI Motivated Self-Starter Python C++ Java Java C++ Python C++

    Motivated Teamwork Python Motivated C++ Perl Motivated Perl C Java Self-Starter Windows GDI Self-Starter Java GDI Motivated C++ Windows Windows Windows Teamwork Self-Starter GDI Self-Starter C C Windows SQL Windows Python Python GDI Motivated GDI Perl Teamwork SQL Perl Self-Starter Java Python GDI Teamwork Teamwork Motivated Java SQL Windows Perl Teamwork SQL C++

    Self-Starter C++ GDI Java Python Windows Perl C++ GDI Windows Teamwork C GDI Python Perl C++ Perl C C++ Self-Starter Teamwork Motivated Python Java Teamwork Java Motivated Motivated Teamwork Motivated Python Self-Starter Java Python C++ SQL Python Teamwork Python Self-Starter Java Teamwork Teamwork C++ C++ Self-Starter Motivated GDI Motivated Windows Motivated GDI C++ GDI Windows Python Perl C Python Teamwork Python Self-Starter Windows Motivated SQL C++ GDI GDI SQL SQL C Self-Starter C++ Java GDI SQL GDI Self-Starter C Teamwork Motivated Motivated SQL SQL Self-Starter

    Self-Starter Motivated C Teamwork Motivated Teamwork SQL Windows Java Windows C Windows SQL C++ Teamwork Python GDI Java C++ Python GDI

    1. Re:My new resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Sir,

      I work for a large corporation in the telecommunications sector and came across your resume on Slashdot. I would be interested in setting up a meeting to discuss a possible employment opportunity. Please visit our website to find out more details on the position (job code 264). We look forward to hearing from you.

      Sincerely,
      G. Oates

    2. Re:My new resume by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2
      Resume Resume Resume Resume Resume

      Java C Windows Windows Motivated C++ C SQL Teamwork C++ Perl C GDI C++ Perl Teamwork Windows Perl SQL SQL Motivated Windows GDI C++ Windows Self-Starter Perl C++ C C++ C++ GDI Motivated Self-Starter Python C++ Java Java C++ Python C++ ...

      You SWINE!! You copied my resume! You may expect to hear from my liars!
    3. Re:My new resume by bpfinn · · Score: 1

      Now all that's left is to create a ton of web pages that link to your resume. Tah-Dah! You're on top of the Google search, right where Mr. Ticketmaster can "passively" find you.

    4. Re:My new resume by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This article has excellent advice for writing a resume in this age of Internet search engines. I've already rewritten mine. Here it is:
      Resume Resume Resume Resume Resume Java C Windows Windows Motivated C++ C SQL Teamwork C++ Perl C GDI C++ Perl Teamwork....


      Now the trick is to get this version to HR, but a real resume to the hiring manager. Some kind of magic ink that changes after HR reads it? Now where did I put my "McGivor's Guide to Resume Writing" book?

    5. Re:My new resume by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to optimize for typos:
      http://www.searchspell.com/pages.html

    6. Re:My new resume by mcowger · · Score: 1
      So my roommate walks in, looks at this post, and says "Hey, that looks like a Makefile!"

      He's right. :)

    7. Re:My new resume by Havokmon · · Score: 2
      Now the trick is to get this version to HR, but a real resume to the hiring manager. Some kind of magic ink that changes after HR reads it? Now where did I put my "McGivor's Guide to Resume Writing" book?

      Try a VERY SMALL white font. :P

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  33. Just the other way around by Wee · · Score: 2
    People without degrees will willingly hire people without degrees.

    This has not been my experience. I've worked in a tech field for 4 employers in two states since 1994. I have no advanced degree (I was 12 units away from a BS in Geosciences when I recruited away from school to California, FWIW) yet I've worked continuously for the last 8 1/2 years. I was only hired once based solely on my resume. All other times, I had some working relationship and/or professional reputation with those who hired me (ie, they knew -- or knew someone who could vouch for -- what I could do). The one time I was hired based on my resume was by a person without a technical degree.

    It comes down to knowing people or being in the right place at the right time, in my experience. You have to know people and they have to know what you can do. Your working life should be thought of as one long probationary period from which future employers can draw by taking a peer's word that you are a good employee. You should also be able to find out a lot about an employer through similar methods. Either that, or you have to look really good on paper and somehow stand out from the crowd.

    The best employment experiences I've had were ones where I knew them and they knew me (at least second-hand).

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  34. A Ticketmaster recruiter? Double-fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most techies know that recruiters are parasites. Negative recruiter experiences far outweigh the positive ones. To top it off, this guy is from Ticketmaster, the concert-venue monopolist that Pearl Jam fought years ago.

    The one good thing about the tech recession is it got rid of legions of recruiters. Unfortunate to have to drown the dog to kill the fleas though.

  35. Insider tips and tricks, condensed version by kwertii · · Score: 3, Funny
    • List buzzwords often in your resume.
    • Put your resume online.
    • Already know someone who is hiring.
    • If this is not possible, already know someone who can refer you to someone who is hiring.
    1. Re:Insider tips and tricks, condensed version by /dev/trash · · Score: 2
      # Already know someone who is hiring.
      # If this is not possible, already know someone who can refer you to someone who is hiring.

      Any picks for the 2003 Super Bowl?

    2. Re:Insider tips and tricks, condensed version by jlia · · Score: 1

      Eagles 24, Dolphins 13

  36. What if by JohnnyKlunk · · Score: 1

    You'd like to be an open source developer for the geek cred, but...
    You don't really know anything about developing
    Want the same great money you're making as an M$ sysadmin
    Are unable to do more than "point and click interfaces", calls to MS and business lunches
    Think slow, strolls through HR, Marketing and the other "nice looking" departments is cooler than developing cutting edge solutions

    Is this job not for me ??

  37. goo-goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as far as googling, we're "hot" there also.

    all ya knead is a dialup & a dream? mod me up robbIE, there's gold in them there custom fitted tuxedos.

  38. Move towards becoming self-employed and contract by NZheretic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If your planning on spending most of your time actually developing or deploying rather than administrating open source systems, then do yourself and open source in general a favor and consider becoming a self-employed contractor.

    As a contractor, it is easier to avoid getting locked into internal (and infernal) NDAs development agreements, the bane of my current position.

    The concept of open source and development is finally gaining ground and it's a lot easier these days to sell your development services, based on open sourced and free licensed software, to other interested parties.

    Individual jobs come and go, but GPL and LGPL licensed source is forever.

  39. Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by Adam+Fisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We see this issue from a slightly different angle -- open source coders for LimeWire offer us an extended "interview" period where we can truly judge the value of their code. This lets us make hiring decisions easily. There's no interview that can substitute for months of open source code. Interestingly, we've seen that one of the primary attributes of people who write good code is also one of the primary attributes that involves them in open source to begin with -- passion for the project. The best coders often don't have the most impressive degrees. Rather, the best coders are the ones who care enough about the project to write good code for it. Experience and training help, but it's passion for the project that makes average code good, or good code great.

    --

    Adam Fisk

    1. Re:Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I hope you have checked with your State to see what qualifies as an employee, or you may find yourself on the loosing end of a lawsuit.

      Actual, check with the IRS. They list 20 thing that indicate someone is an employee, regardless of anything the sign. That applie to courts as well.

      Rul of thumb, if the person doing the work could answer yes to 7 out of the 20 question, there an employee.

      Again, the courts and the IRS don't care about what the person has signed when determining status. this will get you into a lot of trouble if you using 1099.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by shoppa · · Score: 2
      There can be some difficulty in determining, in a multi-person open source project, who the author/designer really is. And who did the coding (good and bad).

      This isn't unique to open-source code, of course. For every big succesful commercial project there are plenty of people willing to take credit for the whole thing, too.

    3. Re:Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by Adam+Fisk · · Score: 2

      That's an interesting point regarding liability in general, and about the IRS. In terms of suite regarding any copyright issues in particular, however, it's unlikely that employees of companies would be held personally liable in any way. The assets of company officers could potentially be fair game in a suit, but even that is unlikely and not really what the plaintiffs would be after (except perhaps as a scare tactic). Given that open source coders could never be considered officers, there's really no legal threat in terms of personal assets.

      As far as the IRS goes, any open source programmers that get paid are required to file their earnings, just as any freelance employee would be. If they're not getting paid, it's off course not an issue.

      --

      Adam Fisk

    4. Re:Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by Adam+Fisk · · Score: 2

      In any project that is centrally controlled, where a set of individuals keeps close track of any new code (and where limited numbers of people are able to add code directly without submitting patches), it's quite easy to know precisely who did what. This is the case with LimeWire just as it's the case with Linux (our job is orders of magnitude smaller and easier, of course).

      That issue aside, however, even if you only know that a specific person wrote a specific piece of code that you liked (whether or not you know exactly who wrote every line in the program), that person has a much better chance of getting hired if and when a position opens up.

      --

      Adam Fisk

    5. Re:Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words; Spell checker.

    6. Re:Open Source a Fantastic "Interview" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "c", "h", "e", "c", "k", "e", "r".

  40. FOR GREAT GLORY~!!!! by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 3, Funny

    all your base belong to a beowulf cluster of natalie portman's with hotgrits down their pants

    3) PROFIT!!!

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:FOR GREAT GLORY~!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4)???
      5)loss, I mean, PROFIT!!!

  41. How I got my last job by Binarybrain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sometime during the last few days at my last job I happened to ask my employer why he hired me. The reason was rather caught me by suprise.

    Because I hated Microsoft. Im not kidding. He figured that if I was smart enough to dislike Microsoft that I probably knew what I was talking about.

    1. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's like the time Hitler hired me because I hated the jews! Too bad it's so much harder to find work down in here in South America, though.

    2. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I hated Microsoft.

      You're an idiot. How can you hate a company? It's not like they're testing their products on animals or sending people to death camps. You don't hate corporations. People you hate are Nazis or terrorists. Not companies that sell software. Get a life, move out of the basement, take a shower, and stop jerking to anime pr0n.

    3. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and now I work as a Karma HO!

    4. Re:How I got my last job by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Funny

      What did you do? Mop the floors?

    5. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Boys and girls, we have a new leader in the illustious Lying to Impress the Slashbots World Finals 2002.

      Or, maybe your "boss" just knew a sucker when he saw one.

    6. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why would a Taco Bell manager care what you thought about Microsoft?

    7. Re:How I got my last job by Binarybrain · · Score: 2, Informative

      I developed a content management system.

    8. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with anime pr0n?

    9. Re:How I got my last job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he figured if you were smart enough to hate Microsoft, you would be "smart" enough to work for $10/hour on his Linux-enabled P-133 systems that he got at Goodwill.

    10. Re:How I got my last job by mkweise · · Score: 1

      Well, tell us the rest of the story: did you also ask why you were let go? And was the anser to that also Microsoft-related?

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
    11. Re:How I got my last job by Binarybrain · · Score: 1

      I wasn't let go. My job was to begin the workings of a content management system. If I was to complete that before the expiration of my time granted by higher ups there I was to begin a migration to open office.

      I guess the reason for them picking me for the position was that they were currently trying to rid themselves of the MS products they had. They knew that I had a working knowledge of alternatives and wasn't a risk of recommending non-open source products to higher ups.

      The plan there was to eventaully move to a Linux desktop for all employees. There were to many hang ups for that to ever get accomplished though. To many old school non-techie employees there were to attached to certain applications. That was the major hang up that was the show stopper. Not that Linux didn't have alternatives to their apps. For example, one person wouldn't move away from PhotoShop even though we tried to get her to use the Gimp.

    12. Re:How I got my last job by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      I developed a content management system.

      Emptied the bins, then?

  42. Top 20 in your field... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's somewhat disheartening when I read an article like this. If you are one of only 20 people that can do a particular job, do you really need this advice? If you are not, according to Todd Cranston-Cuebas, don't bother applying - you're not at the top of your field. I guess the -98%- rest of us hard working experienced programmers, project managers and architects can just suck eggs.

    1. Re:Top 20 in your field... by Anitra · · Score: 1

      Not to mention us hard-working no-experience students...

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  43. Now I Really Won't Get A Job by aerojad · · Score: 1

    All the cool jobs just got /.ed

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  44. Crappy hiring techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another reason is that some recruiters use applicant tracking programs that do automatic skills assessment based on keywords found in the resume, and will rank resumes based on that assessment.

    Having seen my fair share of resumes padded with every acronym under the sun, I have to say this is a pretty crappy way to do recruiting.

    There's a reason why people get hired based on "who they know"... it can be an effective filter.

    Looking for a job? Get to know people!

  45. DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by kingkade · · Score: 2

    a word of warning, for anyone who thought this ass-clown might have something funny to say: he doesn't he's just another angry loner with not one original thought in his tiny brain. just a sheep, your bus is leaving, you fuckstick.

    1. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you were dumb enough to click on it.
      fuckstick? what's that?

    2. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckstick - (fukstik) n. - Closely related to, but not quite like a fucktard. See also fucknut and, more commonly, fuckhead.

    3. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by kingkade · · Score: 2

      Actually I didn't click on the link Anonymous Coward.

      See dimwit, I have something called a memory, which is a feature of something called a mind which in turn is a manefestation of an organ called a brain. This unique device actually helps me recall experiences I've had before and learn from them.

      Am I going too fast for you, little troll?

      As for your poorly-formed inquiry: here you go, fuckstick. Also, you're one of these as well.

      Oh and read a book, fuckwit.

    4. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes! Fuck-stick! How appropriate that it's used mainly by britons, who, may i add, have little to no oral hygeine. additionally, a large portion of the male population is gay; this may be attributed to the fact that british women are repulsive. thank you kindly for the references on the word, have a good day.

    5. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, most british broads are real repulsive. but there are a few cumbusting ones (elizabeth hurley w00t)

    6. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why's it appropriate? what does a fuck stick have to do with repulsive brit chicks?
      interesting it is, no?


      i'm hazarding a guess, but i'm willing to bet you're an ugly fucking, fat ass.

    7. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      At least most british males have not had their genitals mutilated when they were babies just in a misguided attempt to make them enjoy sex less.

    8. Re:DONT CLICK ON LINK IN ABOVE POST!!!! by hplasm · · Score: 1

      OO! Who got a knockback from a (not)holiday romance then?

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  46. Now hiring OS Developers! by NineNine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Payment:

    I'll buy beer for you and won't tell your parents.

    You get to look at my personal collection of nudie magazines.

    You can code at my office, and tell your parents that you're at a sleepover. I'm an adult. They'll believe me.

    I can pick you up from school, posing as your parents.

    I have a PS2 and Grand Theft Auto: Vice City!

    You can have all of the soda and candy you want.

    Please send resume and/or high score list.

  47. From actual exp some advice by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    The actual best advice I can give from actual project exp is that most of the old farts know never and I repeat ever depend on a recruiter to get your foot into the door and the job!

    My best techniques are to get a hold of the CEO and CTO of the company and blow my own horn about my qualifications..

    You would be surpirsed at how many CEOs and CTOs actually want to hear form the applicant without all the filtering that recruiters try to do..

    Why? Imagine a non tech recruiter trying to recruit for perl programmers.now Imagine how the ad comes out:

    Wanted 2 years exp in Pearl

    No I am not joking you still see these ads

    Unlike he says tech recruiting is done primary by non tech people with no exp in your field..its better to go right to the hiring manager..better odds..

    What opens the door to CEOs and CTOs:

    1- Ask specific tech and proejct related questions..put yourself in the architect seat or the CTO seat and think about what questions need to be answered to make the project a success.

    2- Always be grasious and polite no matter what answer you get back.

    3- Use consise questions and respect their time

    Okay last point how to network around recruiters

    Go to those sites where recruiters ads are easy to spot so that you can filter them out, sites such as:

    guru.com

    craigslist.org

    javalobby.org

    Remember you want to increase your chances not decrease them so avoid high recruiter trafficed sites like monster.com and dice.com

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  48. What????? by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    to get the degree so you can get a good job so you can get the pretty and vapid girl so...

    My friend went to school to school to get her degree to get the job to get the hunky, vapid man. Just pointing out that you're a sexist pig, no flames please ;-)

    Simon

    1. Re:What????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it mean he's homophobic?

    2. Re:What????? by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Actually the US is blatantly sexist pig-like, and the commonly introduced stereotype is to get the pretty girl.
      I'm just passing that along.

    3. Re:What????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stereotype applies to women as well; that is why they say a young woman going to college primarily to find a husband is working on her MRS degree, hahaha

  49. Eww by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 1

    "Make yourself googleable."

    Do /.ers always have to leave room for porn jokes? :-)

    --
    And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
  50. It's not that simple by dcavanaugh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a manager with no degree, I am in a position to comment.

    I give careful consideration to all applicants, but I take a sceptical view of those people whose only claim to fame is a degree or certification. I want experience, or concrete evidence that the candidate is prepared to do the job with minimal babysitting. Another thing I want is some longevity. If I'm hiring for a full-time position, I view it as a purchase as opposed to a rental. You would be amazed to see how many people have years of experience, but never more than 12 months at any one place. What assurances do I have that such people are not simply hopping from one contract to the next, leaving behind a trail of destruction?

    My hires have ranged from a high school dropout [long story omitted], to an MSCS. I'm quite proud of my people; all except one have worked out well. I don't actively seek to avoid hiring people with degrees, I'm just not convinced that the credential means much. This means I'm tough on recent grads, but who isn't? For the record, I hired a recent grad after he spent some time in my department as a temp -- another success story.

    I believe that managers will repeat any behavior that works, and abandon that which does not work. After you get burned on a few bad hires, you will seek to avoid whatever led you down that path.

    1. Re:It's not that simple by erix*+(extra+fees+ma · · Score: 1

      I beleive claming to fame 'a dregree' is better than 'I have no degree, but it's not that usefull and I am good'. It has to be faced, degrees are so close to *useless*, especially for those who don't have them.

      You don't want to babysit ? Well looks like he have been able to finished a dregree. The other one didn't.

      Hey, doesn't mean he's not good ! There are some people 'not willing too much' everywhere. If I want that Windows based server fixed, watch me trust with advantage the Microsoft Certified fellow. He took care to study in the field...

    2. Re:It's not that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be amazed to see how many people have years of experience, but never more than 12 months at any one place. What assurances do I have that such people are not simply hopping from one contract to the next, leaving behind a trail of destruction?

      What makes you think you're entitled to assurances? What assurances do your prospective employees have that once they've bought a house two miles from your office that you won't fuck them over and into foreclosure?

      Do you offer guaranteed contracts? If not, then shut up about assurances.

    3. Re:It's not that simple by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      dcavanaugh wrote:

      Another thing I want is some longevity. If I'm hiring for a full-time position, I view it as a purchase as opposed to a rental.

      Hmmm. I assume longevity, then, is something you as a manager can offer your employees, too? Can they feel confident that there won't be layoffs, that the company won't collapse, that there won't be huge accounting scandals that ruin their retirement?

      What assurances do I have that such people are not simply hopping from one contract to the next, leaving behind a trail of destruction?

      I dunno. Why not ask the applicant? Maybe former employers too. Maybe you can find out whether they did well in those jobs.

      Maybe he's hopping from contract to contract, leaving a trail of happy employers- maybe he's worked for a lot of high-risk companies that went under or had to lay him off, and he's looking for something now that's a bit more stable (if you purport to offer it).

      I don't think your metric has much value, but I'll be honest- with a big stack of resumes, some winnowing technique must be used. It's hard to argue with one that's worked, and isn't outright unethical.

      --
      --Matthew
    4. Re:It's not that simple by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      You would be amazed to see how many people have years of experience, but never more than 12 months at any one place. What assurances do I have that such people are not simply hopping from one contract to the next, leaving behind a trail of destruction?

      No, I wouldn't be amazed at all. It's a bit naive to think that sort of work history has been anything but typical in some sectors--for years, now. If you want assurances, interview them hard, and check their references. Meanwhile, how about giving us some assurances that you're committed to long-term loyalty to your employees, and won't lay us off next Christmas to appease your new CEO, who's making arbitrary budget cuts to line his own pockets.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    5. Re:It's not that simple by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      You seem to be saying that as employers don't offer you a guaranteed job, you don't offer them guaranteed service.

      Absolutely.. however.. will you work for an employer who has a record of laying off his workers every 12 months or so? This is the same thing in reverse.

      He's not asking for guarantees or contracts stating you will work for X years.. those would require compensation and other things.. he's just saying that, if your last 5 jobs were all a year or less, then something is probably up (obviously depending on what the jobs were).

      If the work is obvious contract work, that's not what he is talking about.. he's talking about people (and I'm sure we all know people like this) who work for a job for around a year, and then look for the bigger, better deal. They jump ship for a couple more bucks, a fresh start, etcetera. As an employer, this is not an attractive characteristic. You would like to think that if you treat your employees fairly, they will stay.

      Why did you leave your last job? You will be asked this in an interview. If your main reasons seem to be "more money" then it's obvious that as soon as someone comes along offering a bit more cash, you will flee.

    6. Re:It's not that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your main reasons seem to be "more money" then it's obvious that as soon as someone comes along offering a bit more cash, you will flee. ...and if the employer can find someone to work for less, they'll fire your ass so fast it'll make your hair turn white.

      Right now, the only flimsy power an employee has is the ability to leave. If the employer gets all 52 cards, the employee is fucked. Period.

    7. Re:It's not that simple by hendridm · · Score: 2

      > I take a sceptical view of those people whose only claim to fame is a degree or certification.

      So I guess the rest of us who graduated from college and can't get experience because nobody will hire us are fucked then.

      If I wasn't supposed to go to college, what do you suggest I SHOULD have done after high school? College certainly hasn't paid off.

    8. Re:It's not that simple by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3

      "I beleive claming to fame 'a dregree' is better than 'I have no degree, but it's not that usefull and I am good'"

      It depends on how many examples you have that support the "I am good" assertion, especially if those examples are logically presented with proper spelling and grammar.

    9. Re:It's not that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the right thing to say. He wants
      assurances because he thinks he can get them; it
      is human nature to always want more. The flip side of that is
      to ignore the fact that the only realistic solution for
      "assurances" is to pay well. There you have it:
      either pay for the solution that works, or resort on hunches and tea-leafs.

    10. Re:It's not that simple by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      If I wasn't supposed to go to college, what do you suggest I SHOULD have done after high school? College certainly hasn't paid off.

      You were supposed to go to college, but in a field that isn't so drastically oversaturated as tech is now a days. That way, you wouldn't be competing for entry level positions against people who already have 10+ years of experience.

      Sad, but true.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:It's not that simple by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      mindstrm wrote:

      You seem to be saying that as employers don't offer you a guaranteed job, you don't offer them guaranteed service.

      Only partially.

      Absolutely.. however.. will you work for an employer who has a record of laying off his workers every 12 months or so?

      No. But I think the parallel between "laid off workers" and "stopped working there" is a bad one. After all, he didn't say "quit their job every 12 months". What about a company that's extremely upwardly mobile, with people not holding the same positions for long? (that's quite a bit different from annual layoffs) What about an employee who went from contractor to employee for a vendor to employee for a customer?

      If the work is obvious contract work, that's not what he is talking about

      Excuse me if I take his words at face value, and ignore your attempts to interpret it. He made a pretty clear statement that didn't provide for "if it was contract work."

      he's talking about people (and I'm sure we all know people like this) who work for a job for around a year, and then look for the bigger, better deal.

      No, he's not, because that can't be measured with the metric he mentioned. Maybe that's what he's trying to winnow out, but that's not all he's cutting out.

      Why did you leave your last job? You will be asked this in an interview. If your main reasons seem to be "more money" then it's obvious that as soon as someone comes along offering a bit more cash, you will flee.

      Not necessarily. As an example, I left my last job because as much as I loved it, they weren't prepared to offer me enough to support both me and my fiance moving into town. When I get a kid, I probably won't be comfortable working where I am now, much as I love it. Then, and in the future, I will be leaving for "more money," but I'm not a fly-by-night programmer looking for my next buck. In fact, I pick jobs (and work environments) well enough that I expect my main reason for leaving, over time, will be either "they went under" (won't happen at Carnegie Mellon), or "I needed more money."

      My point being, it's a complicated issue that requires consideration of a number of factors and information coming from a number of sources (former employers, the prospective employee, references...). However, a recruiter sees enough applications that they can't give all this information due consideration for every applicant- they have to have simple, moderately effective, metrics for throwing out 90% of the resumes with very little thought.

      So while I'm arguing that this fella's metric isn't perfect, I'd probably do something similar.

      --
      --Matthew
    12. Re:It's not that simple by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      "Meanwhile, how about giving us some assurances that you're committed to long-term loyalty to your employees"

      I believe it's the classic risk/reward equation. During the Dot-Com era, the highest salaries went to those who abandoned their relatively stable jobs to go off and join startups. The companies that "went public" spewed forth plenty of money for salaries, bonuses, and stock options. Those that failed to go public are pretty much gone by now. Hell, they're ALL pretty much gone by now!

      I work for a company that has nothing to do with IT, but we use IT to help provide services. Do I make as much as I could have with a dot-com? No. Do I make as much as I should, based on salary surveys and other data? Nope. Do I pay my staff as much as they are worth? No; I'm very lucky to have them On the other hand, we survived the Dot-Bomb era, no problem. The company has been around for almost 60 years, so they won't be disappearing anytime soon. Even when some divisions had problems and layoffs, corporate IT was unscathed. I believe it worked this way because I kept the department small when I could easily justify 2X as many positions as I have. This means a substantial backlog of projects, but it also means the knife of corporate austerity does its damage elsewhere.

      Nobody is going to get rich working in my department, but I think I do a world-class job of defending my people. What I fail to understand is how so many people thought it was possible to earn big money without big risk.

    13. Re:It's not that simple by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was in college back in the early 80s. At the time, new grads were having a hell of a time landing jobs. I was really worried about graduating and finding nothing to do. By the mid 80's, things warmed up just a little. I was looking for a part-time job that would provide meaningful experience, because it looked like experience was the only way to get a "real" job later.

      I applied for what I thought was a temporary, part-time, third shift operations job in a data center that ran a bunch of DEC VAX machines. The job they offered me was first shift, and 91% of full-time (state employee benefits included). I was a junior in college, who accidently landed a job that was no worse than what a new grad would get. I decided to take a break from school and go back when the job ended. Well, the job that wasn't third-shift or part-time wasn't temporary either. The original employee on leave never came back, so I became an accidental full-time permanent employee. I never went back to school, because I stayed 13 years, with five promotions, ending as the Director of Technical Services.

      If I had stayed in school, I would have finished in 86 or 87, and the job market was really hopping by then (but who knew back in 85?) I was so happy to have found a job, I thought it would be stupid to finish school if that meant graduating into a down market. Having seen how many employers "required" degrees but "hired" experience, I determined that experience would win out over degrees most of the time, or at least often enough to keep me working. My cynical view of employment has served me well. After 17 years of uninterrupted employment, I'm having a hard time seeing the downside of quitting college early.

      So, why do I post this mini-autobiography? To illustrate just how cyclical the IT has always been. When it's hot, anyone who can type can get a job. When it's cold, having a Ph.D. won't help. So, I think the strategy is to build credentials and manufacture your own experience in the "cold" years, as you wait for the "hot" years. If you live in a high-cost area, consider moving someplace cheap. There is no reason to tolerate a high cost of living unless you have a big paycheck to cover it. Go back for an MSCS or MBA degree if you can; work outside IT if you must. Either way, start your own little empire of computers, using open source (Linux) or free downloads from Oracle (free for non-commercial use, including home hacking). If you can pick up contract work of any type, then you'll be in a position to do something when the market heats up again. Timing is everything.

      The fact that we have a down market combined with a glut of H1Bs makes me wonder if we are going to see a massive correction when the market heats up. I predict a shortage of IT people, because it makes no sense to invest 4 years of tuition just to compete with H1Bs. Then again, my prediction plus $1.10 gets you a medium coffee at Dunkin Donuts.

    14. Re:It's not that simple by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but which fields are you speaking of? Accounting, History, Sociology, Mathematics perhaps? I don't see those as any more useful than a degree in IS or CS right now. Perhaps you are referring to the medical or engineering fields. Those areas aren't for me. So am I doomed to working loser jobs or going back to school to be a nurse or engineer?!

      *sigh* Always looking for the answer...

    15. Re:It's not that simple by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      it is human nature to always want more.

      No, that is greed, not human nature. Although, if you are surrounded by people who are greedy then I could see how you would stay that. Maybe you could say that "it is American nature to always want more."?

      OK, enough of that, who should we invade next to boost the economy so we can have more open source jobs..... Come on, let's just go for Poland.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    16. Re:It's not that simple by KatieL · · Score: 1

      Actually, when interviewing, I tend to find the people who have moved around a lot are much more flexible, more widely read and have richer experience.

      In the UK there's a tendency for some people to go round lots of companies doing 12 months at each and some people sit at the same desk and have 1 years experience several times over.

      Hiring people who've seen lots of ways of doing things and lots of corporate environments and solved lots of problems in lots of fields is great way of getting a richness of experience.

    17. Re:It's not that simple by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      So am I doomed to working loser jobs or going back to school to be a nurse or engineer?!

      You are doomed to take a shitty job (mc donalds?) for a year or two while working on an open source project on your spare time.

      Then you can say: "I'm good, look I made this!" on your resume and get a good job

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    18. Re:It's not that simple by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2
      The company has been around for almost 60 years, so they won't be disappearing anytime soon.
      Tell that to the (ex-)employees of Arthur Andersen.
      --
      Yeah, right.
    19. Re:It's not that simple by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      Considering how all the big accounting firms are motivated to lie, it was only a matter of time before one of them got caught. I'm not claiming that any of them lie, but the motivation is surely there. People who pay for accounting & consulting services are not always interested in the truth.

      In my line of business, lying would not help, not even short-term. Had I gone to work for Arthur Andersen, I'm sure they would have paid more than I make now. However, it would have meant sitting a little further out on the risk/reward curve. Working in a conservative industry means I can spend my free time on Slashdot instead of Monster, Careerbuilder, & Dice.

    20. Re:It's not that simple by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...I tend to find the people who have moved around a lot are much more flexible..."

      That is certainly one of the possibilities. There is something to be said for a person with 5 years at 5 different employers -- a richer experience.

      When a contractor is really good, the employer is often motivated to make an attractive full-time offer. When I see a person whose career consists of 10 six-month assignments over 5 years, I have to wonder:
      • Why didn't any of these 10 employers want this person for more than six months?
      • Did this person rely on the short-term nature of these assignments to avoid following any of these projects through the entire development cycle?
      • Could they actually maintain these projects or have they been sliding along?
      When you make a good hire, you worry about how long you can retain the person. When you make a bad hire, retention is no problem; mediocrity lasts forever. If I want a good person and I want to keep them for at least a few years, the many-job candidate is not my first choice. Unless the interview process turns up something important, I can't expect them to stay any longer than their track record would indicate. A competent person who stays 5 years is more valuble than a superstar who is gone after 1.

      If I want a temp, I'll hire one. For projects of a temporary nature, the job-hopping issue is no problem. Either the person works well and I offer a full-time deal, or they're gone at the end of the contract.
    21. Re:It's not that simple by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Fair enough. All of my job-hopping was a result of walking into a very volatile job market at an entry level. At first I figured I'd start out as a temp, then earn a permanent position. After a while it became clear that most of the IT departments in my area had a very different idea about temps: they're cheaper than full-time employees, and if you purge them every six months, you never have to worry about the headhunter's fee for making them perm. Then there was the company that hired me perm, and within a year they'd cut their staff from forty down to ten, and moved from San Jose, CA, to Spokane, WA. After that was the perm job where I got laid off in one of the many layoff waves that plagued every company in our sector. They just kept reducing staff, and replacing expensive, experienced techs with cheap, entry-level monkeys.

      My worst nightmare during this period was walking into an interview with a manager who didn't "get it" and would dismiss me out of hand for my job-hopping, rather than actually interviewing me and getting some idea of my actual skills, attitudes, and desires (namely, for a stable, long-term job where I'd actually have time to make meaningful contributions to the company).

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  51. Googleable. by richjoyce · · Score: 0

    Yeah, make yourself googeable so when you're on slashdot, they can always go to the cache!

  52. How I did it by mikosullivan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Without planning it or expecting it to happen, I got a new job developing open source software last month.

    My wife Starflower and I have been volunteering for the Rescue Mission of Roanoke, a Christian organization that provides meals, shelter, and other needed services to the homeless in the Roanoke area. It's a great place and Starflower and I are very proud to help out there.

    One evening I was having dinner with Joy, the director of the mission, and she mentioned that her computer had crashed a dozen times that day. Out of habit I said that that sort of thing doesn't happen in Linux. She got very interested and said that I was the fourth person to say that, so tell her more about this Linux thing. Well, I gave her the standard pitch, talking about the value and quality of open source in general and Linux in particular. I told her about LTSP and how the mission could make life a lot easier with a set of thin clients and one good server. I talked about how great and helpful the open source community is. I even mentioned that Larry Wall (I'm doing the database project in Perl) is an evangelical Christian. Joy was very interested in all of this.

    The following week, I presented a requirements document for a new database system using Apache, PostGres and Perl. I call the system Joyis, and you're welcome to read through the document yourself.

    My intention was to develop the system on a volunteer basius. The management team had a better idea: they offered me a full time job on the spot. I accepted on the spot. I'll be developing Joyis for the next couple months, then migrating the entire mission to a completely open source infrastructure: Linux, LTSP, OpenOffice.org, Evolutions, and of course, Joyis.

    The pay ain't much, but we can get by on it. On the plus side, I get to spend all my time in my favorite development environments, working my own hours, and creating a system that will actually help people and make the world a better place. When I'm done, Joyis will be released open source so that other homeless organization can use it. Keep an eye on SourceForge for the first release in a month or so.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:How I did it by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      Sweet. I'm doing the same thing more or less for my own church, except they can't pay me squat. :)

    2. Re:How I did it by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      One evening I was having dinner with Joy, the director of the mission....I presented a requirements document for a new database system using Apache, PostGres and Perl. I call the system Joyis....

      There's the trick: name the system after the head honcho/honcha.

    3. Re:How I did it by krinsh · · Score: 2

      The pay ain't much, but we can get by on it.

      I'm glad you are humble enough to go this route. I sincerely doubt that despite all the hippie hype; many others would be willing to balance their satisfaction with their pay. For example; recall the posts of those that say "They can't afford me."

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  53. No, but really by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    I love it when you people get bogged down in your own phylosophical tar pits.

    No, you have it all wrong. See? It's not like that at all. I'm just changing the definition right now to make a point, but bare with me. "Free" is not "free" but rather "open". See? And "open" means "free" in the sense that "free" tends to also be "open". Get it? No? Oh, you must be a M$ advocate then, fuck off.

  54. PLEASE MOD DOWN OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    k thnx

  55. I clicked... by WeeLad · · Score: 1
    I'm a fuckstick-tard-wit-whatever.
    All I found was a 404 page. What'd I miss? And where did you remember it from?

    --
    Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    1. Re:I clicked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real URL can be found at this location.

    2. Re:I clicked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. Because you have you phone/ethernet cable unplugged...Wait for it to sink in...

    3. Re:I clicked... by WeeLad · · Score: 1
      I clicked that URL too. Boy, I'm gullible.
      However, I clicked it with Mozilla on my Linux box, so all I got was the first page w/picture, and no sound.
      Being glutton for punishment, I decided that it was probably "optimized for Internet Explorer".

      I tried with iexplorer on a win98. Now that's funny!
      I know a few people at work tomorrow who are going to load their pants when I tell them to bring that URL up.
      (Unless of course they already knew about it like some of you ./'ers apparently did.)

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
  56. Re:A Ticketmaster recruiter? Double-fault! by WeeLad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My girlfriend used a headhunter to apply for a not-IT job, and was turned down. A short while later she had an opportunity to talk to the would-be employer and they said they would've loved to have hired her, but the headhunter was way too pushy.

    The headhunter called the prospective employer numerous times every day trying to pressure them to make a decision and lied to the employer by saying that his client was currently weighing a couple of offers, "So they'd better hurry and make up their minds". The prospective employer told my gf that they would've hired her if she hadn't used that headhunter.

    That quickly turned me away from headhunters.

    --
    Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
  57. Ticketmaster.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a great job!

    They seem to be hiring every month or so!

    The job is so good that people want to leave to let others in on the greatness that is 'working for ticketmaster'.

    That job must really suck since its open every 3-5 weeks.

  58. Moronic advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's a turnoff to see a resume that includes everything you've ever touched
    ...
    For your top skills, you want to repeat the skills and their abbreviations in all their forms, multiple times throughout the resume.

    translation: be real subtle

    Basically, you want to make sure you can get a high ranking hit. I'll be using Google, AltaVista, and all major search engines.

    translation: next time, you might also want to SPAM us, that will show your determination

  59. Mod Parent Up by Petronius · · Score: 1

    What's the difference between sorting out 3,000 resumes and 3,000 irrelevant google links? 'Nuff said!

    --
    there's no place like ~
  60. a bit late by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    1999: "How To Get Hired As An Open Source Developer"

    2001: "How To Get Hired As A Developer"

    2002: "How To Get Hired"

    1. Re:a bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You will never, ever get modded up because...

      1. You are right.
      2. This is Slashdot.

      ... but, just so you know, that's totally insightful.

  61. GNU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm willing to work for free as in freedom, but not free as in beer.

    Then again, I'd work for beer too, but you'd have to pay me twice my salary's worth in beer. I could sell it at a great profit.;-)

  62. Fuck H1Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's unfortunate that the US government requires a degree [in the field of expertise] in order for foreigners to obtain H1B work visas.

    It's unfortunate that considering the number of unployeed tech's out there that the Govt. has allowed the H1B program to continue. Other than the fact that 2/3 H1B's that I've met have been incompetent. Yet they continue to be employed because they work cheap.

    If companies are having trouble finding qualified employees perhaps they need to start investing in training and then compensate the trainees. Not say, "you were making "$11/hr doing tech support? Well now that you've transfered into applications development here's a %15 raise" then they bill the poor bastard out @ >$100/hr and expect him to take it because he doesn't have any "Real Industry Experience"..

  63. work cheap? by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even with a College/Uni degree, or diploma, nobody should really expect to get out and immediately get a $75000/yr+superduperbenefits job. Really, what you should look for is a job that you would like, make you enough income to survive the first year, and looks really good on a resume.
    Barring that, you can also spot the companies you'd wish to work for that do pay the big bucks, and try getting in on one of the lesser positions.
    It's 100% easier to climb a ladder when you're already working in a company. It's also (ironically) very often easier to get a job when you've already got a job. You don't have to mention on your resume that you're "undervalued and underpaid", just list what you're capable of, and the fact that you are currently doing it helps prove so.

    There are a lot of small/starter companies who need computer support that frankly can't afford to pay big bucks in the beginning. They do look good on a resume though, and the work generally isn't too hard. Oftimes if you are lucky, said companies can end up growing, and as they grow - so often does your paycheque.

    It's hard to think of with the cost of living nowadays, but sometimes the value of a position is not in the paycheque, but in the respect, references, and experience it gains.

    Oh, and a big problem with small companies is that it gets really hard to leave when you're ready to move on... they tend to grow on you.

    1. Re:work cheap? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's 100% easier to climb a ladder when you're already working in a company. "

      I find that to be false.

      If you want to climb the ladder, the best way is to find another company that is hiring for that position. In general you get a higher pay increase, no need to deal with the projects that you have gotten associated with, and a better opertunity to start focusing your next step right away.

      I wish it wasn't that way, but it is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:work cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      nobody should really expect to get out and immediately get a $75000/yr+superduperbenefits job.
      Around here (near Clemson, SC), the expectation is to get a job, and even that is horribly unrealistic. Where'd you come-up with the $75K/year idea? The last tech job fair I attended, the only two companies that were hiring were paying less than $20K/year. After just over 30 years in this business (no, not a misprint), I'm about fed-up with the low pay and terrible hours. My brother is a plumber and makes just over three times what I do. $75K per year? Who really expects that?z

    3. Re:work cheap? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      ...a job that you
      would like,
      make you enough income to survive the first year, and
      looks really good on a resume.

      Pick two.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    4. Re:work cheap? by Blenderkitty · · Score: 1

      Only job I can get right now? QA in an ass-backwards IT department.

      "would like"? nope...
      "Enough income"? not with student loans...
      "looks good on resume" not for an aspiring developer

      i'm screwed.

    5. Re:work cheap? by krinsh · · Score: 2

      Oh, and a big problem with small companies is that it gets really hard to leave when you're ready to move on... they tend to grow on you.

      A big problem with small companies is that they'll call you on Monday and tell you your last check is that upcoming Thursday; so sorry, nice working with you these past eight months.

      There are risks and advantages to any size team or company. The smaller the team; the more likely you are to have several responsiblities where you can handle support tasks of varying types. You aren't just there to do one task, and one task only. You get into larger groups and oftentimes you aren't going to be branching out into other areas of interest because there are several specialists per task already.

      I was going to say that you risk the smaller company going under and you losing your job; but larger companies are just as likely to rid themselves of you nowadays than they would have been 2 or 5 years ago. I'll take the less pay and broader opportunity of a small team inside a big company and wait for the economy to so-called "right itself" in due time.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    6. Re:work cheap? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling - I'm a student myself, and the market looks pretty bleak for entry-level jobs. I'm going to have to find something in April/May - but it's just as likely to be a minimum-wage job at Subway as it is to be an entry-level one in IT.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    7. Re:work cheap? by phorm · · Score: 2

      Good point, that actually happened to me... found out Monday, done on Thursday. Of course, nowadays you're not even safe in a big company. It's easier to see it coming, but if you're a small guy you tend to be vulnerable to downsizing.

    8. Re:work cheap? by krinsh · · Score: 2

      Yep. And now I've discovered as a consultant; you need to be aware that companies struggling very hard to continue being viable in the current market will try and slide a lack of specific benefits (like holidays) past you and also put a lot of pressure on you if you *do* find better work during a 2- or 3-month gig and leave before it is complete.

      On the same note; you may have to be pretty flexible with your days and hours in a one- or two-week period as you transition and help the other temp get situated. But you know; 10+ years ago when I was an admin assistant trying to go to school and get a different career than clerical; you knew you had to be flexible in order to get paid.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  64. Get you priorities straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is not about a company supporting the open source revolution. It is about a money grubbing, evil empire

    What would you prefer, a rich company that gives money to open source projects we all can use or a rich company that gives money to Microsoft? The choice seems pretty clear to me.

    They have certainly done some great things for the Perl and Apache communities, including sponsoring mod_perl work (which benefits Slashdot, among others).

  65. Job offer, and personal info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slightly related
    A potential job?

    Also isn't there a danger to putting personal information online like the story suggests?

  66. Well... by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's easy to forget that there are several different categories of software development, each with different things driving them. Here's a gross simplification of how I see it:

    There are 3 distinct major groups of developers:

    1 - people who earn money developing software for sale as a product: to them, open source generally != good

    2 - people who earn money developing software (embedded, hardware device drivers, etc.) to support another product that is sold: to them open source: sometimes == good and sometimes != good (gives away, architectures, secrets)

    3 - people who earn money developing software for IT purposes and/or in-house use: to them, open source generally == good

    Of course, there are many other groups of developers (academic, recreational, etc.) and there is intermingling, so the above is not a hard and fast rule.

    I also think that this is also one of the reasons that you often see acrimonious debate here at /. - each group has a different set of objectives and priorities.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      3 - people who earn money developing software for IT purposes and/or in-house use: to them, open source generally == good

      I am only replying to this because it is an outright lie which is often repeated on this site. Most companies consider their internal IT applications to be Intellectual Property which is used as a competitive advantage in the marketplace. You do not want your business competitors to get a hold of your internal apps and make money off of your development efforts. From the company's prespective, there is nothing to gain, and everything to lose. Thus, most companies will use open source if it saves them money, but would fire anyone who even suggests open sourcing their internal apps. This is why most open source development experience is met with scepticism is the marketplace. For every door that opens due to having open source development experience on your resume, you close at least 10 others. If you list linux on your resume, always include other proprietary Unixs and Windows as well. Most hiring managers have met at least one GPL zealot, and will not hire an "open source developer" under any circumstances.

    2. Re:Well... by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 2
      Here's an example of the acrimony that I was talking about - note the use of the phrase 'outright lie' :

      this because it is an outright lie

      No, it is not. To be an outright lie I would have had to say "to them, only open source == good ". I did not.

      I said "to them, open source generally == good". Perhaps "generally" is too strong for you - YMMV, etc. I'll accept amending it to "sometimes". All situations are unique and neither of us should be so foolish as to suggest that we know and understand every possible scenario.

      I don't disagree with your IP argument, but I think that you are fixated on the applications development end of things. Don't lose sight of the hosting end of things. Many IT applications are Linux hosted because Linux is open source. There's a lot to be said for having control of your own destiny. Also, don't forget that not all IT exists in a competitive business environment (think governments, academic institutions, etc.).

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  67. Why to hire OSS developers by Adam+Wiggins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I spend a lot of time dealing with hiring for the IT staff at my company. These days, I pretty much instantly trash any resume doesn't include some sort of background with creating or maintaining an Open Source projust of reasonable size. It may be an unfair bias, but experience has shown me that OSS developers are almost always an order of magnitude more skilled and more responsible than applicants from other backgrounds.

    The self-motivation, self-discipline, organizational skills, and willingness to write code that the author isnt ashamed to display to the whole world are exactly the sort of traits that employers look for (or should be, anyway).

    1. Re:Why to hire OSS developers by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      I spend a lot of time dealing with hiring for the IT staff at my company. These days, I pretty much instantly trash any resume doesn't include some sort of background with creating or maintaining an Open Source projust of reasonable size. It may be an unfair bias, but experience has shown me that OSS developers are almost always an order of magnitude more skilled and more responsible than applicants from other backgrounds.

      The self-motivation, self-discipline, organizational skills, and willingness to write code that the author isnt ashamed to display to the whole world are exactly the sort of traits that employers look for (or should be, anyway).


      And, of course, the willingness to work for next to nothing doesn't hurt when it comes to your balance sheet.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:Why to hire OSS developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, right.

      So the fact that I've been a serious benefit to my last company for the past 10 years, making them millions of dollars but not having any time for serious open-source development makes me a loser?

      Yeah, dream on pointy head.

    3. Re:Why to hire OSS developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the most part the only people who have lots of time to devote to open-source project are students.

      That's all fine if you're looking to hire fresh, inexperiences meat. However, if you're looking for someone who can actually support your company and has the experience to keep your company healthy then you are much more likely to find that a person with real-world experience.

  68. Re:Move towards becoming self-employed and contrac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    consider becoming a self-employed contractor.

    Where does one find gigs? Marketing skills are not something common in /.'ers.

  69. GPL violators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not exactly sure about this company, but it is known that at least one very large ticket point-of-sale system vendor is using GNU/GPL code as part of their software products, claiming it as their own, denying that they're using it, in total violation of the GPL. Basically thinking that "hey it's free sosftware/free sourcecode, I'm going to use it as I damn well please and screw the GPL".

  70. Why would you get advice from Ticketmaster? by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This isn't a troll, just a general observation about ticketmaster as a company.

    My latest experience with them, trying to buy phish tickets, ended up in disaster. Not only did ticketmaster manage to sell out of their 60,000 tickets (spread over 4 days of shows for phish on dec 31,jan1,2,3) in just under 30 minutes to nobody except scalpers via their main website. The claim is that no tickets were sold to anybody anywhere except via credit card through the website, no phone orders, no walk in's. Yet the website was unavailable the entire 30 minute period, yet they still sold all their tickets? This isn't the only time this has happened, just the most recent for me.

    If you get advice from ticketmaster, take it with a grain of salt. They can't even sell tickets properly and legit. They don't know how to run a high load web server, and they don't even bother to attempt to spread the load out. anybody that would treat their multimillion dollar contracts as that unimportant as to not have a properly working website is not going to give you sound advice.

    My advice? If you want open source advice, don't ask people that don't even know how to run a website.

    --
    Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
  71. Re:A Ticketmaster recruiter? Double-fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Then they sign agreements once they get you in to never hire you out from them and do not tell you. When you hear from them again get ready for the pink slip on the next check. Also, there 30% cut is comming from somewhere and it isn't from the employer anymore. You are going in at a 30% disadvantage on salary.

  72. In this economy by Twister002 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You should probably check to see whether or not the places they've "hopped" to in the past 12 months are still in business. I've had 3 jobs in the past 3 years and I have YET to voluntarily LEAVE a job. :)

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    1. Re:In this economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop doing whatever you are doing to get fired.

    2. Re:In this economy by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2
      There are different kinds of layoffs:
      • If you have 1000 non-union IT people, and a 5% layoff, then 50 of the "weakest links" are going to be gone.
      • If you have the same 1000 people and a 50% reduction, then there will be plenty of talented people among the 500 casualties, but the worst will go first.
      • With a 100% reduction, the talent pool starts to look pretty good, since the best & brightest are now available.

      Reference checks are difficult when the applicants past employers are out of business. Even when the ex-employer is still in business, most will never say anything negative ex-employees, and many have "zero disclosure" policies that circumvent the entire purpose of a reference check. I have had some success asking the magic question "Would you rehire?" Asking for an opinion instead of a statement of fact works wonders.

      It's difficult to tell the difference between a compulsive job-hopper, a deadbeat who gets consistently canned, and a talented person who is stuck with the LIFO scenario. It's also difficult to read a resume (or check references) to determine which of the 3 layoff scenarios has taken place. A letter of reference (with an e-mail that works) from a past supervisor may be the only thing that helps.
  73. Uhh by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    public company, etcetera.... Larry Ellison does not do all the hiring.

    Not having a degree WILL keep you frmo many corporate executive positions... there will be a point where you can go no further.. not because of what you know, but because of public perception... if they hire a VP with no degree, and he screws up, it's the fault of those who hired someone without even obvious credentials.

    1. Re:Uhh by El · · Score: 2

      Larry used to interview every potential new hire personally, until the company became too large for this to be practical. The point was that Larry and Bill do to a large extent determine the corporate culture of their respective companies.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  74. Dynamic Developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to work where Kara works.

  75. the best way to make yourself hireable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to cook burgers!

  76. Interesting... by mikehunt · · Score: 1

    From the article "...because some of the best people in the industry don't have degrees".

    I come from exactly that background. I got my first computer (ZX80) at 13 and built it from a kit. Got some good experience in a whole range of tech jobs when I left school at 17, contracted for a time, and ended up with an excellent tech consultant type job.

    I've hired quite a lot of people over the years and I've met stupid and smart graduates and stupid and smart 'self-taught' types.

    The thing I found about the non-degree people was that the good ones really burned for programming - they really loved the kick that came from breaking a 'simple' sentence down into thousands of lines of code and making it work!

    Some of the best degree guys urgently needed to pay off debts and you knew you were only going to be used as a stepping stone to the next job.

    The only other difference was the bad habits that the academics had already got into and the willingness of the 'self-taught' types to learn from their peers.

    Hopefully, computer education is now better than when I went to school (I am now 37). At school in the UK, I was just one year in front of the first year to get computer classes. I taught myself assembler when I was 13, and learned how computers work internally. When I saw a basic exam (O level) paper at 16, I could have re-written the paper so that the questions were no longer ambiguous! It was a terrible exam paper! I freely admit that I am far from the best designer or programmer in the world, but learning most of my trade on the front lines of computing has given me a much better instinct for what might work than many people much more qualified than me.

    So, I guess I have to own up and say that I think that 'self-taught' guys are better than graduates because they have the burning passion for computers, technology and programming - and they want to do something tangible with it now!

    ...Dons asbestos suit and retires...

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being self-taught myself, I agree with your premise that the degree in and of itself does not mean you're a better programmer. Personally, I went to the military after school and never worked with computers professionaly until I was discharged. Though, every base I went to I would become the dedicated PC guru who fixed computers for everyone from my fellow enlistees to the CO.

      When I was discharged I was lucky enough to befriend someone who turned out to be a really great programmer and mathematician (Double Masters degrees in Software Engineering and EE, wow.) who helped me launch a career as a developer.

      Unfortunately, most people(read HR types) look down on us that have not attended college as peons and will pass us up with out so much as a, "How do you do?". Also, my experience with some of these college types is that they didn't go into CS because it was really interesting to them, but because their career counselor told them it pays well.

      Personally, I spend more time studying that most college students I know and have a better grasp of concepts and the real-world. I've operated a fork-lift as well as an enterprise server. I've also "debugged" diesal engines. Most of the American college types I know only knew how to work the Nintendo and the Beer Keg.

      Now I work for an entrepeneur who started a development company. He has a house near Chicago and Las Vegas, a Lexus SUV, and 2 $80k Mercedes. And guess what! He never went to college either! :-) I'm not quite making what he does but in this day and age I think I'm doing okay.

      BTW, I started on a TRS-80 Color Computer III ;-)

    2. Re:Interesting... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      I think that 'self-taught' guys are better than graduates because they have the burning passion

      I think that some of the very best coders I've seen are field switchers - they have a strong educational background/knowledge of some other field, plus the passion/self-taught characteristics of the non-graduate. That is a powerful combination.

      One thing I watch for when hiring is what the programmer has at home - if he doesn't have at least three machines all running differeent OS's he doesn't have the calling.

    3. Re:Interesting... by jnana · · Score: 1

      You're making the unwarranted assumption that people are either passionate or have a degree. Wrong! Some people have strong passion for coding and they pursue that passion in school for a while. You might be right on average that a self-taught programmer is more passionate about what they do than a degreed programmer, but there are so many exceptions that it's a pointless observation.

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You try to make the case that self-taught people program because they love it and degreed people often got the degree only because their career counselor told them to, but your second-to-last paragraph totally belies your earlier points. Quote:

      Now I work for an entrepeneur who started a development company. He has a house near Chicago and Las Vegas, a Lexus SUV, and 2 $80k Mercedes. And guess what! He never went to college either! :-) I'm not quite making what he does but in this day and age I think I'm doing okay.

      Your tacit acknowledgement that making a lot of money is the mark of success seems to contradict the 'do-it-for-the-love-of-it' attitude that you earlier attributed to self-taught programmers.

      Hypocrisy nazi officially off duty now.

    5. Re:Interesting... by Kenshiro · · Score: 1

      > if he doesn't have at least three machines all running differeent OS's

      I know some very good coders who have no machine at home all. For several years (early 90s), i had only a dumb terminal :).

      And after a cross-atlantic move, I've gone down from many many machines, to exactly one tiny laptop (which runs a few os's plus vmware to test development kernels). Did my abilities just nosedive, then?

    6. Re:Interesting... by Matt_B_T · · Score: 1
      One thing I watch for when hiring is what the programmer has at home - if he doesn't have at least three machines all running differeent OS's he doesn't have the calling.

      I'm an undergrad, so my only experience is internships and assessment centres, so take this with a pinch of salt. No matter where I've been, work/life balance has been talked about a lot, to the point of telling people to go home because they're working too long.

      Fine, you may be passionate about whatever your field is, but that can go too far.

  77. This is an unclear topic to me by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

    What's the main difference between recruiting for open source skills (e.g. Apache, Linux, MySQL, PHP, etc.) versus proprietary skills (e.g. Microsoft .NET, Novell, Oracle, etc)? I don't get it I think I need a little help in the terminology here.

    Is it possible to code an OpenSource app.. but it be written in .NET ? does the .NET license prevent programs written in it being opensource?

    Is hiring FOR opensource meaning hiring someone to work on an opensource project, hiring someone that HAS worked on something opensource, or someone who only works with opensource platforms such as PHP?

    I Be confused says I.
    and frankly I don't wanna work for google.
    Sure they offer you 80k... only to be laid off when the stock dips. Oh, you don't think it's possible? look at AOL, look at yahoo.

    --Zuchini

    1. Re:This is an unclear topic to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, Google isn't a publicly traded company, so how is there stock going to dip?

  78. Cause and effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind me not to hire you...

  79. In short, shy people have no chance (again) by bluGill · · Score: 2

    In short, shy comptuer geeks, which is many of the good ones, have little chance. I'm a good programer, but I like to sit in my little corner and program. One day I found myself out of work, and boom, I looked around, and so where most of the people who knew I was a good programer. (My small group)

    Mind you, the above story is nothing new. Every shy person faces it everytime we need a new job. I can deal with people, I just prefer not to, and when I have a good job I like to get the job I'm hired to do done.

  80. And the conclusion?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You have a job but no degree. So what? I hope
    you are not suggesting that you (in general) have equal advantages
    than those with degress. Even you will admit that
    you don't.


    And there are thousands of people who won the
    lottery, are you suggesting that it is easy for anyone
    win? And furthermore, are suggesting that it is
    winning game for most people? Obviousl not.

  81. Just a bit by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    If you add some "Cindy Crawford" and some banners, you could get self-employed as well.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  82. OSS developers have the best traits for sanitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >I spend a lot of time dealing with hiring for the staff at my company.


    What Mr. Wiggins doesn't tell you is that OSS developers have the self-motivation, self-discipline, willingness, and low job expectations to remove tough clogs from sewer pipes for his company. Those OSS types sure are amazing!

  83. Tin Foil Hat THIS, buddy!! by The+Iconoclast · · Score: 2

    Right, so this story is currently in the midst of being played out by YOURS TRULY.

    Thanks to everyone's FAVOURITE media monopoly, ClearChannel, which is the OWNER of TM, I and a friend were EACH screwed out of $40 because of our dietary restrictions due to our religious/ethical beliefs. Just for the record, I keep Kosher & my friend is a vegan, just like the HEADLINER of the Area2 concert, Moby. We wanted to see the Area2, obviously.

    We bought tickets over the web to the Area2 concert when it rolled into Philly. Before purchase there was NO indication of what restrictions would be placed on our tickets. Of course, AFTER we had paid, and our tickets printed on our printer, did we see all the fine print on the ticket that said, "subject to venue rules" or somesuch.

    Ok. Fine. We check the website for the venue, the Tweeter Center in Camden, NJ (btw, ALSO owned [or is that 0WN3D?] by ClearChannel), and it seems like we'd be allowed a backpack & a small amount of our own food. Of course, when we GET THERE, they inform us that we cannot bring our own food in. We are REFUSED ENTRY due to our religious beliefs. I and my friend cannot eat the food they have there, and it its a 6 hour+ show. Oh, I also forgot to mention the fact that they were only allowing ONE bottle of water per person. This was on quite possibly the HOTTEST day of the year in a venue that has NO shade.

    So, to sum up, I (and my friend) were REFUSED ADMITTANCE based upon our religious beliefs, not to mention the fact that apparently, ClearChannel wants to KILL all of their customers through dehydration. They refuse to refund the ticket price, claiming "all sales are final." However, they did NOT divulge the terms of purchase until AFTER the purchase had been made, and then even CHANGED terms on us!

    If that's not a tangible example of someone being harmed by CC's evil monopolistic behavior, I don't know what is.

    --
    Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
    1. Re:Tin Foil Hat THIS, buddy!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sue them.

  84. LUGs by Idou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Join a LUG or create your own. I know a guy who kind of "took over" a LUG I helped started and then became to busy to participate in. He got a really good gig through the LUG and paid for the LUG's new site, as a token of gratitude.

    He knows his stuff and was always patient with everyone he explained stuff to. I lot of people come to LUGs thinking they can learn how to solve their own IT problem but instead they find it is easier pay a signficant amount of $ to this friendly guy they met at the local LUG.

    What can I say, Open Source is a give and take institution. Give freely and often, and you are bound to be noticed.

    Good luck!

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  85. Well by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    then please, go hop jobs all you want.

  86. Geeks don't marketing . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "the pay ain't much, but we can get by on it. On the plus side, I get to spend all my time in my favorite development environments, working my own hours, and creating a system that will actually help people and make the world a better place."

    And don't forget . . . the free marketing! I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of articles are published on this and that means more exposure, more offers.

    Have a blast with the project but don't sell yourself short. You might think about turning this into your next career;)

    Best of luck!

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Geeks don't marketing . . . by mikosullivan · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of articles are published on this and that means more exposure

      Me neither, especially since I'm already talking with my contacts in the press and outlining the press kits. (yes, really)

      and thanks for the encouragement :-)

      Miko
      B.S. Marketing, R.B. Pamplin College of Business, 1992

      --
      Miko O'Sullivan
  87. One way to get your resume taken seriously... by esconsult1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never been turned down for a job I interviewed for, and I dont have a degree, and I've never been fired. My skill sets are sparse: PHP, Postgresql Perl, MySQL, Apache, Linux etc... Here's what I did:

    1. Went into detail what I did in the last 3 jobs, I mean serious detail. It means that the people that I'll work well with, will appreciate my resume instead of some PHB looking for acronyms.

    2. Include links to articles I wrote, and postings I made in forums for all the above technologies. The last job I got was because they received help from some silly posting I made and forgot about years ago.

    3. Include links to interactive sites that you helped build. Forget the pretty stuff, the fancy HTML, that's not what you will be hired for, instead, link to the interactive portions of the site that actually do something.

    4. Always have some code samples handy with lots of comments. Include some OOP examples along with traditional procedural code.Even if they dont use OOP, at least they know that you can.

    5. Make sure that you will have lots of hits in google, which will turn up all your online activity.

    6. Dont bring your resume to the interview. Instead, when they ask for it, give them the URL where they can view it.

    7. Refuse a job where they require your resume in Microsoft Word format. It means that they are not really an open source shop, and the PHB's probably use Outlook, Exchange, Office and IE. Tell them that you are refusing the job because of that reason. They will respect you for having the balls to do it, and in the same vein, always submit your resume in text format in the email to the recruiter (not as an attachment).

    8. Be assertive in your resume, tell them exactly what you want to do. Dont be vague about what you want to do. Tell them how you can help them, and that you will make a great fit in their org. If possible, tailor your resume for each job you are applying for.

    9. Don't mention that you can use a word processor, browser, or spreadsheet. That's passe, everybody's expected to do that. Don't mention that you can admin an NT/2000 box (even if you can), instead, tell them in the interview.

    I guess there are more tips out there, but for last 2 jobs and 4 interviews in 6 years, those have worked well for me.

    1. Re:One way to get your resume taken seriously... by Maul · · Score: 2

      How do you avoid the problem of a PHB or HR Drone who is LOOKING for acronyms or fancy buzzwords in your resume? Or do you not, and feel these companies aren't worth your time?

      Your method sounds great if you're applying to a place where the person who is reading the resume is someone with a clue.

      However, more often than not they are looking for X+Y years of experience with something that sounds hot in the market, where X is the number of years the product has been out, and Y is greater than 0.
      A college degree is often "preferred but not required," but it seems an absolute requirement to have 5 years experience with a technology less than a year old. Either that or you must know about all the new fads in web design as well as know how to operate ancient systems from the 80s.

      For example, I saw a posting that required 5 years of experience with .NET and C#. Seriously! How the heck does anyone get past that without lying?
      The HR Drone will just toss a resume in the garbage if it doesn't say "5 years of .NET and C#" on it, won't they?

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    2. Re:One way to get your resume taken seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      6. Dont bring your resume to the interview. Instead, when they ask for it, give them the URL where they can view it.

      Are you joking? Paper is so much easier to read. Typical interview: you hand the the guy your resume (even though he already has a copy), he circles a couple of things to ask you about them.

      7. Refuse a job where they require your resume in Microsoft Word format. It means that they are not really an open source shop, and the PHB's probably use Outlook, Exchange, Office and IE.

      More likely, the developers and admins use OSS but the secretaries, HR, and management use Microsoft like the rest of the world. There's really nothing wrong with this.

    3. Re:One way to get your resume taken seriously... by ickle_matt · · Score: 1

      Well, I recently got rejected for a position because I "don't have .NET experience". The 18 months C# I'd mentioned on my CV didn't seem to count...

    4. Re:One way to get your resume taken seriously... by Frobnicator · · Score: 2
      Most of these are the generic items that apply to everyone. I've looked for jobs, I've hired people. When looking for a job, think first about what you would do when hiring people.
      1. Went into detail what I did in the last 3 jobs, I mean serious detail. It means that the people that I'll work well with, will appreciate my resume instead of some PHB looking for acronyms.
      Not enough detail is a problem, but so is detailing everything. That's covered in pretty much every job-hunting book.
      2. Include links to articles I wrote, and postings I made in forums for all the above technologies. The last job I got was because they received help from some silly posting I made and forgot about years ago.
      I doubt they read your links. Someone may have looked at one or two, but that looks like they went searching and found you, not the other way around.
      3. Include links to interactive sites that you helped build. Forget the pretty stuff, the fancy HTML, that's not what you will be hired for, instead, link to the interactive portions of the site that actually do something.
      4. Always have some code samples handy with lots of comments. Include some OOP examples along with traditional procedural code.Even if they dont use OOP, at least they know that you can.
      Never hire a programmer without looking at code. Never apply for a job without a code sample. If you are fresh out of college you have the most code samples -- every assignment you ever did. You have the least if you are a 10-year in-the-trenches person, but then the company should consider work history over your coding style.
      5. Make sure that you will have lots of hits in google, which will turn up all your online activity.
      That's only important if that's your line of work. Just like getting a job in the game industry is easier if you have your name in credits, or the movie industry if your name is on the credits. Or going into academia you should bring or have online a list of your publications. Or applying for a broadcasting position, try to show how you affect television ratings. That step is just another way to say "I can do this job." What's more important is that if you google for yourself, you don't find NEGATIVE things.
      6. Dont bring your resume to the interview. Instead, when they ask for it, give them the URL where they can view it.
      I did that ONCE. Never again. ALWAYS bring a resume. You can say 'I would like you to look at my web site, which has links' if you interview is going well (or bad). A good resume/CV will lead the interviewer and help them ask specific questions about you. Such as "I see you worked on project X. Tell me about it." When I interview, I bring a folder. The top-most tabbed section has several sets of resumes and CV's, including some specifically targeted for them asking me questions. I have copies of questions that I would ask if I were interviewing myself for my dream job. I have statistics for the job they are offering, salaries for the area, and other notes. I have extensive notes about the company (which I make some sort of comment about). I also have the normal stuff (old jobs, old salaries, contacts, references, etc.) I have in my binder many code samples, including a CD with samples that I can leave with them containing many samples. In short, when you go to an interview, BE PREPARED, they may actually want to hire you.
      7. Refuse a job where they require your resume in Microsoft Word format. It means that they are not really an open source shop, and the PHB's probably use Outlook, Exchange, Office and IE. Tell them that you are refusing the job because of that reason. They will respect you for having the balls to do it, and in the same vein, always submit your resume in text format in the email to the recruiter (not as an attachment).
      I would change that to say "Refuse a job where they want you to use tools that you don't want to use, and tell them why if you have moral, ethical, or professional reasons." That argument applies equally well when applied to any other area. Just saying "I WON'T use (brand) tools" is bad, it makes you look immature, uncooperative, and unprofessional. Saying "I WON'T use (brand) tools because I have had these experiences with it" is still bad, it implies that you didn't bother to get over the learning curve. Saying "I will not use or don't like (brand) because (state reasons), may I use (alternate tools) instead?" is about the best you can do in that situation, because they can see your reasoning (or lack thereof) and consider your alternative. They may feel the same way and just haven't expressed it.
      8. Be assertive in your resume, tell them exactly what you want to do. Dont be vague about what you want to do. Tell them how you can help them, and that you will make a great fit in their org. If possible, tailor your resume for each job you are applying for.
      You can read that in any resume book, and most job hunting books. Some people will give you the job if you are basically qualified and are the only one who asks "Will you give me the job?"
      9. Don't mention that you can use a word processor, browser, or spreadsheet. That's passe, everybody's expected to do that. Don't mention that you can admin an NT/2000 box (even if you can), instead, tell them in the interview.
      I disagree. If you are looking for an entry level data-entry person, they WANT to know that you can type. They WANT to know your WPM and ten-key speed. They WANT to know that you can use spreadsheets IF that's what they're using. If you are being hired for your PHP and SQL knowledge, don't bother going into detail about your C++ skills. If you are being hired as an assembly-level programmer for 3D graphics, don't ramble on about the PHP solution you wrote on your last job.

      But on the other hand, the article was pretty good.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    5. Re:One way to get your resume taken seriously... by tyse · · Score: 1

      I have 3 years experience with .NET.

      If you were involved with the technology under NDA you can have at most 3.

      If you worked at Microsoft you might have 5.

      But I know what you mean. Recruiters are not technical guys. Most of them think all the technology is the same, and it's all cutting edge stuff.

  88. please stop the fud. by gimpboy · · Score: 2


    Most companies consider their internal IT applications to be Intellectual Property which is used as a competitive advantage in the marketplace. You do not want your business competitors to get a hold of your internal apps and make money off of your development efforts. From the company's prespective, there is nothing to gain, and everything to lose.


    speaking in terms of the gpl: if you extend a gpled product for internal use, you dont have to relaease the source. this is because the software is being used internally and thus not being distributed. because the applications are being used internally, your competitors wont have this advantage.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:please stop the fud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then you're not an "open source" developer, which is what the original article was about.

  89. the method I used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Go live in India
    2. Fake Indian citizenship using HP printer
    3. Practice accent
    4. Come over as an H-1B Visa worker
    5. Profit!!!

    No "???" step needed.

  90. Re:OSS developers have the best traits for sanitat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Mr. Wiggins doesn't tell you is that OSS developers have the self-motivation, self-discipline, willingness, and low job expectations to remove tough clogs from sewer pipes for his company

    No, we use H-1B's for that. The OSS dudes are to clean off the H-1B's after clog is cleared.

  91. Never underestimate a Geek . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "B.S. Marketing, R.B. Pamplin College of Business, 1992" ;-)

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  92. Shared political ideology, not talent, got you job by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Troll

    Because I hated Microsoft. Im not kidding. He figured that if I was smart enough to dislike Microsoft that I probably knew what I was talking about.

    You may very well be a very talented person, but your boss may be an idiot. It seems your boss hired you due to a shared political ideology. Do you think half the vocal MS haters around here could build a working non-trivial system?

  93. Open Source needs very few Pros by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

    I guess the -98%- rest of us hard working experienced programmers, project managers and architects can just suck eggs.

    Well open source needs very few Pros, or rather it can support very few Pros. It is like sports, there is only a handful of professional spots available. After toying with the idea in school you should expect to need to find a "real" job and resign yourself to playing in a local softball, basketball, or soccer league.

  94. Wither Posting? by interociter · · Score: 1
    I post on various boards under various names, but I'm not sure how many of my posts I want my employer to read. I'm pretty OK with a manager or potential manager noting my XP on perlmonks. I'm less sure about my slashdot postings, do I really want a manager to know how much I loathe irix? Would an anti-MS rant from 1999 scuttle my chances at a job writing Winamp plugins in 2005? Lastly, I'm damn sure I don't want any manager to see my ranting on marijuana legalization on likeimgonnatellyouwhere.com.

    I'm also curious about how you'd put this on a resume. Add "And I post on perlmonks.com under the name camelfucker" to the contact section? Add your XP or Karma to qualifications? If I was an HR Manager and wasn't familiar with Slashcode and the sites that run it, it would be far too easy to think it was a high score. Seems to me that unless the board you reference is very specific to your profession, you should keep it to yourself.

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  95. Excuse me by brandonsr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How to get hired as an open source developer. I'm sorry, I don't understand how this is possible. Mod me down, I don't care! How on earth can someone get paid for developing free software. Yes, I know all the pro-open source people are going to attack me. Bring it on.

  96. Self-taught are not as good ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess I have to own up and say that I think that 'self-taught' guys are better than graduates because they have the burning passion for computers, technology and programming - and they want to do something tangible with it now!

    The self-taught are usually not as good as those who are self-taught and formally educated. Why do so many think the two are mutually exclusive? At age 37, I'm there too, you should be able to recall a time when those entering computer science programs did so because they had passion and interest, not because the high school guidance counselor said it was a good career path. College can give you access to a lot of equipment, resources, and experience that can be used for personal project and interests.

  97. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just put them back in... 15 times, just the keywords... in a size 4 font ... at the bottom of the page... bold ... italics ... with strikethrough or something.

    No, it is not human readable, it looks like some funky border or something, but the text is there and a search will find it all very simply.

  98. An even better one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    take this resume, cut, paste into your current one, set to a size 4 font, and set text color to white. :)

    1. Re:An even better one!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how does one do this with text only?

      Actually, i'll probably use a similiar strategy for those-who-are-not-even-a-life-form-known-as-head-h unters. Copy this inot the word document in white at font -200 and attach it to the real resume......

  99. Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't Ticketmaster already have an app that sells tickets?
    How many more developers, open-source or not, could they possibly need to justify having at least one full-time recruiter on staff who spends his whole day looking for repetitive resumes on personal web sites?

  100. Re:OSS developers have the best traits for sanitat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought I'd see "OSS dudes" and "clean" in the same sentence.

  101. So is it like this ... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

    1. Spot a vacancy

    2. Write a resume

    3. ???????

    4. Get hired!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  102. A CompSci degree is more than just a bit of paper by horza · · Score: 2

    My experience is that good managers who are knowledgable about the workforce will hire people without degrees. People who are poor managers and in over their heads are too afraid to hire non-degreed personnel because they feel it will reflect poorly on them. It's the HR equivalent of "no one ever got fired for buying Microsoft".

    I would consider someone with a degree over someone without (if they were roughly equal in all other ways) as I know the person that studied CompSci will have a reasonable exposure to algorithms, OS and hardware architecture, as well as software engineering methodology. You at least know you aren't going to get someone that would use a O(n^2) algorithm for a basic sort. Of course you can take time and give all the candidates extensive technical tests, but with a degree that's already done at someone else's expense.

    Phillip.

  103. Re:A CompSci degree is more than just a bit of pap by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    I would consider someone with a degree over someone without (if they were roughly equal in all other ways) as I know the person that studied CompSci will have a reasonable exposure to algorithms, OS and hardware architecture, as well as software engineering methodology

    You know that they've had reasonable exposure to it, but that doesn't mean they actually learned it or can apply it in a practical setting. I've seen plenty of CS grads implement bubble sorts in production code, incidentally. :-)

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  104. Looks like nobody caught this... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    It's unfortunate that the US government requires a degree [in the field of expertise] in order for foreigners to obtain H1B work visas because some of the best people in the industry don't have degrees.

    Okay, this numbnuts is bitching about all the resumes Ticketmaster has to cull through and stating that all they're really looking for is people that can actually do the work (meaning people that pass his computer's little buzzword test), then he goes and makes the quoted statement. I'm sure there are plenty of recent U.S. college grads that would probably like to be considered before Ticketmaster goes abroad looking for people, but they would probably actually expect to get paid, unlike the H1-B's Ticketmaster is wanting to hire. I'm ready for my (-1, Troll, Offtopic) now, Mr. DeMille....

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    1. Re:Looks like nobody caught this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of the recent US college grads are dipshits, and can't program their way out of paper bags. Whether or not you have a degree is irrelevant as to how good your code is, and the quality of your code is the only thing an employer should look at, not whether they have a degree, and not what country they come from.

    2. Re:Looks like nobody caught this... by tcrancue · · Score: 1
      I should clarify this point since many people obviously misunderstood it. First of all, we don't rely exclusively on the buzz-word test. Screening resumes for the basics just makes sense. If we're looking for a senior mod_perl engineer, it would be ideal for "mod_perl", or any potential spelling variant, to appear somewhere in the resume. We do skim through the mass of resumes as they arrive, but will also do a quick index search for likely hot hits that require that we respond immediately. What constitutes a hot hit depends upon the specific needs for that role (e.g., location, skill level, specific skills, degree, etc.).

      With regard to the H1-B issue this has nothing to do with compensation, not wanted to hire Americans, etc. It does have to do with bringing together the top people in a given area of expertise. A quick review of founders and committers to top open source projects (e.g., apache, mod_perl, etc.) will include people from just about every nation in the world. Believing that only Americans can lead and provide cutting-edge solutions to software development is simply xenophobic. The issue in question is bringing together the best in the field regardless of national barriers not taking jobs from equally qualified Americans.

      With regard to your comment about recent college grads... We're talking at people who typically have different levels of expertise and experience. The H1-B applicant I was referring to, although I shouldn't limit this only to H1-B visas since there are a number of different work visa types, is normally more experienced than a recent graduate if applying for a senior-level position. If you recently graduated and are a proven open source guru, then great! Having a CS degree can provide a strong foundation in development and we do look for people with degrees for that reason. However, not having a CS degree doesn't restrict you from the pool of very talented open source visionaries. It does, unfortunately in my opinion, limit your ability to work in the States.

      Clearly, all of these comments should be limited to a specific discussion on building a team of technology elites and not general hiring. Other complex issues regarding the general state of the market, the current availability (over availability?) of talent in certain technologies/career levels, just compensation, other visa issues (not just H1-B) etc. are a different matter and open to discussion.

  105. Networking by dswan69 · · Score: 1

    Cranston-Cuebas: In today's market, a lot of recruiting and job hunting is a networking game. Make sure that everyone you know knows that you'll consider other opportunities. Word of mouth is becoming more and more important.

    Huh, so what has changed? This is exactly what they were telling us at school 20 years ago.

  106. Open Source Development Labs by Bryce · · Score: 2

    OSDL (http://www.osdl.org/) is hiring
    right now, particularly looking for people
    with perl/C/Linux development and sysadmin
    experience.

    OSDL's a non-profit in Beaverton, Or, focused on helping provide tools,
    patches, etc. to make Linux better.

    Needs exactly the sort of
    people described in this article as
    looking for exactly this kind of company.

  107. Greed is part of human nature by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    No, that is greed, not human nature

    Greed is part of human nature.
    Just look at any baby or small child.
    Many of us outgrow greed to some extent, but it is a trait that must be unlearned.

    Even cooperation, to a large extent, is a form of greed, because people usually cooperate only when each party thinks that the cooperation is in its best interest, and the more that each is likely to get, the more that each is likely to cooperate.
    Even some altruism (which is also a learned trait) is based on greed, because many altruistic people are that way because they want to get into "Heaven" after they die, or they want to please their "god" (and thus receive "favors") while they are alive.

    To get back on topic, it's understandable why a potential employer would want someone for a long-term position who won't job-hop.
    It's also understandable why a potential employee looking for long-term employment would want assurances that he/she wouldn't be laid off two months after moving halfway across the country.
    (This happened to a friend of mine recently.)
    The solution is to get an agreement in writing.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  108. ResumeAmerica.com? -- ReserveAmerica.com by stu42j · · Score: 1

    major web sites that are part of the Ticketmaster family, including citysearch.com, ticketmaster.com, evite.com, and resumeamerica.com.

    I think they mean reserveamerica.com. resumeamerica.com appears to be one of those crappy 'search' sites. ReserveAmerica.com does online reservations for camp sites across the country. I used it recently and had a little trouble getting through the interface but it was pretty nifty none-the-less.

    See: http://www.aboutticketmaster.com/companies/

  109. Re:ResumeAmerica.com? -- ReserveAmerica.com by tcrancue · · Score: 1

    You're right. The article was supposed to say ReserveAmerica.com! Good catch. Todd