Slashdot Mirror

From https://www.wnd.com/2017/07/st...

Eventually, their true identities were discovered, and so, the journal, Advances in Space Research, retracted the paper, though the editors acknowledged that the retraction was “not related to the scientific merit of the study.”

Nikolov told WND that the main reason for using fake names was federal policy under the Obama administration.

“I was told by my superiors that I could not publish anything on climate as a government employee,” he said, adding that he works for the U.S. Forest Service but that the research “was done in my private time, has nothing to do with my work, and does not represent the position of my employer.”

The dire global warnings cause most people with a memory to roll their eyes now.

https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/de...

It's possible and probably helpful to ourselves and the planet to make the world cleaner - I mean who doesn't want to be clean? But tying it end to end of the world warnings is just exhausting. And the more exhausted people are, the less they have energy to care.

Meanwhile, Google's mass surveillance of western society continues unabated.

They didn't address illegal immigration in that video

Well, they did. They just never come out and say, "We're pro illegal immigration!" Instead, they sneer and simper about walls and "xenophobia".

nor balkanization

That's the point. They ignore the downsides of mass migration, foreign cultures, and lax enforcement of illegal immigration.

You are full of stuff. Fox and Rush take a few loonies and paint them as representatives.

Oh really? Then why did so many come out in support of James Gunn? Is it "just jokes"? Why does this excuse never fly if the joke has a hint of racism by somebody on the right? Also, James Gunn was not a comedian. And his "jokes" amounted to, "Hey guys, I like to fuck kids!" over and over again. Strange that Disney would give him a premium job after that. It's almost like pedo signaling is considered a virtue in Hollywood.

Why do we get articles by Vice singing the virtues of a convicted pedophile as a fighter of neo-Nazis in prison?

Why is creepy Joe Biden still in good standing within the Democrat party?

And we haven't forgotten the series of articles put out by Salon.

Twitter is being run by the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations led by Qatar's US-Islamic World Forum and Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal's business partners Suhail Rizvi and Jim Berk. Remember when Saudi Arabia arrested Alwaleed bin Talal and cut off relations with Qatar, before General McMaster fired and replaced Trump's entire national security council and then Alwaleed was released and things returned to normal? Ever wonder what that was about?

They were supported by the Rockefeller-aligned MacArthur Foundation who have staff on the boards of Wikipedia and the New York Times.

And hey look, it's the White House announcing a "global research and action network focused on youth-oriented hate speech online" run by the same exact people and the Muslim Public Affairs Council. But hey, it's not the government censoring you online, it's just the President of the United States whose college expenses happen to have been paid by one Alwaleed bin Talal, and his Homeland Security staff, and a front for al-Qaeda. No big deal!

These websites also want to ban conspiracy theories. I wonder why?

Jeez why do rightwingers have such a persecution mentality. Bloody snowflakes.

Did you think that was clever?

* https://www.dailywire.com/news...
* https://www.zerohedge.com/news...
* http://thehill.com/blogs/pundi...
* https://www.wnd.com/2015/04/tw...

There's a good starter list. Also, in the post you replied to, Jack Dorsey was the name, not Jeff Bezos. Cerebral flatulence.

Second developer of WikiLeaks inspired submission system "SecureDrop", security expert James Dolan, aged 36, has tragically died. He is said to have committed suicide. The first, Aaron Swartz, is said to have taken his own life at age 26, after being persecuted by US prosecutors.

Britain's top human rights lawyer who represented Julian Assange and worked alongside George Clooney's wife Amal dies in apparent suicide

A key witness in the Las Vegas shooting massacre has killed himself and his disabled daughter in a horrific murder-suicide shortly after the FBI raided his home. John Beilman was wanted for questioning by federal agents in connection with a communications device discovered in suspected shooter Stephen Paddock's hotel room.

Klaus Eberwein, a former Haitian government official who was expected to testify against alleged Clinton Foundation corruption and malpractice next week, has been found dead in Miami via gunshot wound to the head. The death was ruled a suicide.

Peter W. Smith, GOP operative who sought Clinton's emails from Russian hackers, committed suicide, records show

When you have many groups in a nation, and many of them hate each other, you will have massive instability. Add technology into the mix and you have a surveillance state. Before this nifty new tech, it would have simply been an informant state as in the Soviet Union: turn in a coworker and get twice as many beets in your soup this week.

doesn't tell why

Knowing why someone does something is always tricky but this might offer a clue.

evidence that gross negligence has been prosecuted?

This offers four examples.

As I understand it, it is not normal for the FBI to make recommendations, nor for the DOJ to request them. The FBI presents the evidence and the DOJ decides. In this case Loretta Lynch handed the hot potato to James Comey, who found a way to drop it. It seems pretty clear to me that a prosecution could have been brought if the desire was there.

You quoted World Net Daily? Seriously?

This is the level of reliability we can take away from your source.

Quite frankly, you should be ashamed. I am actually ashamed for you.

...then you're one weird American. Nobody else does. But as long as we're standing on the sidelines, hands in pockets, could we ask politely for some particulars: concrete policy, enforcement, or regulatory examples, of how Obama was all specially kind to American black people?

The "identity politics" of *saying* something nice are typically used to avoid doing much, and are often seen as a bullshit gesture. Here in Canada we appointed an Inuk (Leona Aglukkaq) as a federal minister, but she eventually failed reelection, because the Conservative government she represented forced her to take unpopular positions in her far-north riding (Nunavut). Her government was happy to have her as a face popular with northern people, but didn't change any policies because of her presence in the cabinet.

Under Obama, I'm at a loss to think of a regulation that was changed, or enforced less or more, that advantaged black people. They didn't appear to get arrested any less, killed any less, their communities didn't seem to get any more money. He didn't hand out a disproportionate number of government jobs to blacks. They didn't receive any special treatment that got them out of more mortgage foreclosures than white people (Neil Barofsky was pretty plain that Obama's Tim Geither only cared about the banks, didn't help *any* foreclosure victims.)

Welfare and food stamp rules didn't change - more people *needed* them because of the giant bank collapse and 10 million tossed out of work, but most of those people were still white. This question cuts both ways: why would black people vote for him so monolithically? What the hell did he DO for them, except psychologically?

People appear, from afar, to act as if Obama offering a few, purely verbal, opinions, was some great act, when none of them actually *DID* anything. Saying that Trayvon Martin looked like him didn't change any policing rules or persecute any cops. The Henry Gates cop still has a job and is now friendly with Gates. More briefly, "nothing happened".

Curious just now for how to end this question, I tried just googling "obama divisive identity" and grabbed the top link, a full article on same by a guy who'd appeared on Hannity in 2012. It has a long bullet-point list of his Obama-is-divisive grievances:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/oba... ...and I could see only two that were about concrete actions that changed government spending, my personal touchstone for words-vs-works. The other 20+ were all just things that Obama *said*.
(The two were "passing ObamaCare", which he'd run upon, and something about the auto bailout, which I could have sworn was popular at the time, certainly with mostly-white auto workers.)

Honestly, if you can't find policy changes, laws, regulations that caused harm, can't you let it go about what speeches or off-the-cuff remarks he makes? They don't hurt anything.

I also raise the issue because this goes, I dunno, not just double, maybe "octuple" for Trump. He mostly *says* things that offend his opponents, but if you had two different sections of the paper, the front page for things Trump *did* and the back page for "crap the President said today", the front page would need almost no space.

All this Trump-Russia stuff is just to distract us from the fact that on November 4th, Antifa super-saiyans are going to kill all the white people. I don't know about you all, but I'm going to stay home with my guns and defend my family and the President of the United States that day.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/ant...

http://www.truthrevolt.org/new...

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/06/...

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fp...

http://forums.sherdog.com/thre...

http://www.topix.com/forum/who...

https://pjmedia.com/andrewklav...

https://www.thenewamerican.com...

https://www.therebel.media/top...

So...He's a lot like Hillary Clinton?

Think about this: We know the name of the philosopher of capitalism, Adam Smith. We also know the name of the philosopher of Marxism, Karl Marx. So, quick: What is the name of the philosopher of fascism? Yes, exactly. You donâ(TM)t know. Virtually no one knows. This is not because he doesnâ(TM)t exist, but because the political left â" which dominates academia, the media and Hollywood â" had to get rid of him to avoid confronting fascism and Nazismâ(TM)s unavoidable leftist orientation.

So letâ(TM)s meet the man himself, Giovanni Gentile, who may be termed fascismâ(TM)s Karl Marx. Gentile was, in his day, which is the first half of the 20th century, considered one of Europeâ(TM)s leading philosophers. A student of Hegel and Bergson and director of the Encyclopedia Italiana, Gentile was not merely a widely published and widely influential thinker; he was also a political statesman who served in a variety of important government posts. How, then, has such a prominent and influential figure vanished into the mist of history?

For Gentile, people by themselves are too slothful and inert to form genuine communities by themselves; they have to be mobilized. Here, too, many modern progressives would agree. Speaking in terms with which both Obama and Hillary would sympathize, Gentile emphasized that leaders and organizers are needed to direct and channel the will of the people.

Gentile was, in fact, a lifelong socialist. Like Marx, he viewed socialism as the sine qua non of social justice, the ultimate formula for everyone paying their âoefair share.â For Gentile, fascism is nothing more than a modified form of socialism, a socialism arising not merely from material deprivation but also from an aroused national consciousness, a socialism that unites rather than divides communities.

Gentileâ(TM)s philosophy closely parallels that of the modern American left. Consider the slogan unveiled by Obama at the 2012 Democratic Convention: âoeWe belong to the government.â That apotheosis of the centralized state is utterly congruent with Gentileâ(TM)s thinking. Only Gentile would have provided a comprehensive philosophical defense that the Democrats didnâ(TM)t even attempt. In many respects, Gentile provides a deeper and firmer grounding for modern American progressivism than anyone writing today.

You really need to pay attention.

A number of years ago our federal government got sold a new method of teaching reading to kids - sight words. This method of teaching was designed to bridge the gap between "poor" kids and "rich" kids ability to read. It does this by eliminating the focus on phonics (sounding words out, and how sounds relate to character combinations) and instead having the kids completely memorize small words. If you show your kid the word "brain" and they say "banana", this is what's going on. When they look at words, they either know them or they don't, they don't try to sound them out, they are taught to simply take a guess and everyone around them will help correct them if necessary and maybe they will get it next time. They are being evaluated by how many out of say 200 words they get memorized through the end of the school year.

Our education system was able to ensure that poor kids could read at a level much more closer to rich kids by effectively not teaching kids how to read anymore. Instead of trying to bring some kids up, they brought them all way down. We are ending up with a bunch of stories like http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/schools-dont-teach-kids-to-read/ that are getting buried in the news.

Be careful what you wish for.

As a parent of a 7 year old having to teach my kid to read myself, I'm pretty damn sure Grey's Law applies here, rather than Hanlon's Razor. At the moment, the kids that are getting ahead are the ones that a) are going to private schools early on (that voucher nonsense? last year when I figured this out, I began to actually start thinking they might have some merit...), b) have parents who actually identify that this is going on, and c) have parents who have the capabilities to do something about it. All the other kids are absolutely being left behind. This failure of our system of education is absolutely unprecedented, and it's all the more horrifying when you understand that the basis of further learning is dependent completely on competent reading skills.

Thank you federal government, for doing your best to make sure that when we fail, we all fail together.

but any evenhanded analysis of

Nice. So, any analysis that disagrees is automatically not evenhanded

I did not make that claim. If you have reference to good analysis that finds otherwise, cite it.

else we'd never have needed the Civil Rights Act and related legislation.

If anything, that legislation has proven itself a remarkable failure 50 years later. For all the "reverse" racist laws and policies, for all the self-flagellation of the Whites, the dissatisfaction among Blacks is still remarkably high — indeed higher now after the first Black President, than it was before.

Should have left it to the market-forces.

Your conclusion does not follow from your observations, mostly because your observations are very shallow. Also, you are engaging in a blindingly blatant false equivalency. I won't attempt to address all of the problems in your statement, but I'll pick just one: the fact that black dissatisfaction appears to be higher after the first black president was elected. Note that I'm not claiming to offer an authoritative explanation of that fact, but just a plausible explanation which suggests a completely different conclusion than the one you're uncritically assuming.

I think the reason that black dissatisfaction has increased is because blacks saw the election of Obama as a turning point in race relations, as evidence that the country really was ready to listen to their concerns about the extensive and systemic oppression under which they live. Prior to that point, they had focused instead on the slow, steady improvement they were seeing, but Obama's election seemed to indicate a step change. In particular, a change that indicated that they were now free to speak out about issues they hadn't previously felt it was safe to speak about.

But the step change didn't actually happen. The system didn't suddenly become fair and evenhanded, and when blacks complained about old injustices what they got was a backlash. Anyone who thought that white supremacy was dying learned that there was a lot more of it than anyone had realized. This backlash resulted in the election of wink-and-nod racist as president, with the full-throated support of lots of open and outspoken white supremacists. The more cynical -- and racist -- blacks took this as confirmation of what they already thought they knew, and the more optimistic blacks felt their hopes crushed.

So I am not in the least bit surprised that blacks are more dissatisfied. They achieved a triumph of progress, only to have their hopes dashed by discovering that it doesn't really mean what they thought it would, and that in fact their situation is even worse than they thought it was. That'll disappoint even the most optimistic.

And how in the world can you possibly equate the dissatisfaction we see today with the open, bald-faced oppression that existed in Jim Crow? That's mind-boggling.

but any evenhanded analysis of

Nice. So, any analysis that disagrees is automatically not evenhanded... One would've thought, this method for pre-emptively disarming a dissenter was mocked out of existence by Hans Christian Andersen in the 19th century, but no, evidently, the "sophisticated" debaters continue to employ it with smug self-satisfaction...

else we'd never have needed the Civil Rights Act and related legislation.

If anything, that legislation has proven itself a remarkable failure 50 years later. For all the "reverse" racist laws and policies, for all the self-flagellation of the Whites, the dissatisfaction among Blacks is still remarkably high — indeed higher now after the first Black President, than it was before.

Should have left it to the market-forces.

Have you been in a cave? They're complaining about white cops and the police culture.

Have you? NWA was calliging out racist black cops in the mid-80s, and I am sure they weren't the first.

Check your confirmation bias.

Check yours.

Ambush-style killings of police up 167% this year. (2016) You think that's just coincidence?
These assassins had BLM affiliations or sympathies.
https://www.usatoday.com/story...

Here are some very anti-white racist statements by BLM co-founder Yusra K. Ali.
https://archive.fo/kpjIG/e8a79...

Remember this?
http://www.washingtontimes.com...

Many lawsuits pending for their violence:
http://www.wnd.com/2017/07/aut...

Eberwein was expected to testify against the Clinton Foundation in court and ends up committing suicide shortly before.

Where have we heard this before?

https://consumerist.com/2012/0...

http://reason.com/blog/2016/05...

http://www.wnd.com/2005/04/297...

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/01/...

http://www.nationalreview.com/...

For two. More?

As opposed to the DNC, who are both highly intelligent, and evil to the core?

Good news: Seth Rich story is building momentum, and no amount of fake Russia news will save the libtards now.
Kim Dotcom is coming over to testify. New evidence just uncovered over DNC/Donna Brazile obstruction of justice: interference with the murder investigation
Question is, how high will it go? Will Obama/Clinton go to jail, or just their co-conspirators?

$6.5 trillion missing from Defense Department

'Fact the Pentagon can't account for how it spent money reveals a potentially far greater problem than theft'

The quicker weapons are spent, the better.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/new...

IT was on the NYT, they edited the story once it was revealed the consequences of that headline. Edited "News" is "fake" news.

Trump's team is known to have had contacts with Russian officials.

Oh Noe! Except Clinton received money from the Russians.

Clinton collected millions in donations from Russians: NYT
Hillary campaign chief linked to money-laundering in Russia

I read about things.

You READ about things? Well, stop the presses then! With literally millions of news sources, could you cite something at least a bit specific?

Voting machines being few and defective in Democratic areas.

States run the elections and voting places, so why would Democrats tamper with voting machines in their own areas?

Voter ID laws combined with closing offices that issue licenses in heavily Democratic areas.

Voter ID laws prevent illegals and dead people from voting, not to mention preventing people from voting multiple times. Again, why would Democratic states close offices earlier if it impacts Democrats from voting?

Illegals and dead people do not vote in significant amounts. This is the sort of fraud that would be easy to find lots of examples of it it were going on, and we haven't seen them.

Funny, but Google pulls up enough examples of voter fraud:

• Hidden Camera: NYC Democratic Election Commissioner: They Bus People Around to Vote
• North Carolina Hillary Supporter Brags on Facebook about Voting Multiple Times
• Double Voting - Even Triple Voting - Found in US Elections
• Democrat Confirms Rampant Voter Fraud
• CBS4 Investigation Finds People Voting Twice
• Detroit Recount Reveals Major Vot Fraud by Dems
• A JMU Student has allegedly registered 19 dead people to vote

Read some real news sometime.

May I suggest the same to you?

I think what you meant to say is that your are amazed that a politician has so quickly fulfilled his campaign promises: 1) to enforce the existing laws of the land through border security and 2) protect national security by halting travel between the USA and 7 countries through which the USA has no formal security setup, some of which are failed states.

Under the prior administrations things were squishy, even though they knew the threats and dangers.

It it time to chose a side. We don't want to end up like Europe. I personally have friends in Germany and France. Their current situation sucks. Their countries are not safe and their refugee friends won't assimilate. My friend in Germany can't even let her little daughters walk to the store alone for fear of refugee men. In France & Belgium, refugee children cheer over the Paris terrorist attacks. Where do they learn this? Is Islam compatible with the US Constitution, freedom, and democracy?

It is time to pause, take a breath, and sort this mess out. And as a friendly reminder, the travel ban countries were chosen by President Obama.

Meanwhile, President Trump is working to get good jobs and the American economy back on track.

This is clearly a man of action, who can't be bought or swayed by polls. This is leadership and getting the job done. It may be a shock. A jolt, but maybe, just maybe this is what we need after 8 years of squishy and 8 prior years of fum-bumbling. I don't agree with President Trump on everything he has done in the first 9 days, but at least their is a leader with America's interests in the White House.

This being a democracy, the congress, and courts with their own powers can fight this out. That is how democracy works. We are also free to protest, start a recall, and/or start a twitter hashtag. History will judge this moment and the moments to come.

The failure goes back at least another generation. http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/06/not-the-greatest-generation/. William's hypothesis is that the people of the 1920s failed to pass on moral values.

My observation is that people have generally failed to properly respond to the Industrial Revolution. The implicit learning and immediate feedback involved in working every day from a very young age with your family has been lost, handed off to professional teachers who don't and can't know what the best interests of your children are. Over the years, the teachers and their unions have become worse.

Of course, if we wish to live in an advanced technological society, specialized teaching is necessary, but parents need to control it and supplement it. This has not been done well.

For instance, many parents who realize that moral training is necessary think that sending their children to Sunday School 1 hour a week for several years discharges this responsibility. It does no such thing.

Let me quickly calculate a code for that... 5777. I admit, I did not come up with that but, http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/rab...

Obama derangement syndrome was real, but Trump derangement is an order of magnitude worse. In 2008 Obama just had to deal with occasional rumors about his birthplace and whatever remnants of open white supremacy still exist in the 21st century, not a year-long media campaign with open, unabashed attempts to portray him as a literal fascist and the second coming of Hitler. Every president gets compared to Hitler of course, but usually by random nutjobs, not major MSM outlets.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/mainstream-media-scream-cnn-compares-trump-to-hitler-stalin/article/2604155
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/5-washington-post-writers-liken-trump-to-hitler/
etc.

BTW that voice in your head right now saying "Well that's different, Trump really is Hitler"? That's the TDS talking.

Then of course there is the constant effort to label Trump and everyone associated with him with every "-ism" they can think of. Freaking Ben Carson is a white supremacist; Steve Bannon is a nazi because Breitbart supports confederate flags and Bannon may or may not have said something weakly anti-semitic in a private conversation 20+ years ago; Trump voters are all KKKers because one attention whore neonazi threw a rally attended by more reporters than people and declared himself king of the alt-right.

(Oh yeah, and then there's this thread blaming him for shit happening before he's even in office. And wasn't Obamacare specifically supposed to do the opposite of things like this?)

when is brittain planning to copy this one?

Well, Twitter is already doing it, in America too — an early bird, so to speak. But, hey, they are a private company, so we have no need to worry, right?

Well, the new generation of citizens is being accustomed to censoring selves and others in colleges — including professors — so, in 10-20 years, you'll have it world-wide, US and other elements of the British empire included.

Twitter says it doesn't tolerate "hateful conduct". That's pretty vague.

I think US borders should be guarded so that people can only come here legally. Does Twitter consider that statement hateful?

Does Twitter consider showing pictures of the US flag on Cinco de Mayo hateful? These Americans were called "Racist a–holes” for flying the American flag in the US on Cinco de Mayo at a school. At the school,

officials had banned the practice to avoid violence threatened by Hispanic students celebrating Cinco de Mayo. The controversy developed in 2010, when school officials ordered students not to wear U.S. flag-themed shirts on the Mexican holiday. The ban has been upheld by a federal appeals court.

Does a picture of someone wearing a Trump hat "interrupt ... operations"?

If you say the words "he", "she", "him" and "her", are you being hateful because those words make gay people feel "marginalized"?

The last three examples are extreme, but they illustrate my point. Twitter has to be careful not to ban political statements because they don't agree with the statements. They should ban statements only if the author is trying to incite violence.

TOTALLY AGREE. As an ex-military NCO with top secret security clearance - requiring quarterly briefings and signed documents attesting to your understanding of the responsibilities and penalties - I am fully aware of the offenses and penalties for abridging the classified document handling procedures.
INTENT is NOT a requirement, only that it HAPPENED by the person's personal choice and their own volition.
THIS, along with being a well-entrenched part of the 'establishment', is what cost "Hillary - dillary - can't touch me - I'm a politician, a lawyer, and I'm rich" the election, even though the choice was an agonizing one of the 'known devil' vs the 'perceived devil'.

Take a trip down memory lane with the following: (some pro, many con'vict')
http://rense.com/general80/hop...
http://www.wnd.com/2000/04/447...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...
https://peterfrancisgeracilaw....
https://www.truthorfiction.com...
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/...
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/20/...
http://www.politico.com/story/...
http://conservativeamerican.or...
http://www.theatlantic.com/pol...

Americans have made their choice, whether through the electoral college or the basic raw vote count - - - being tilted a bit in Hillary's favor, but with the small margin still showing an inherent distrust of the entrenched 2-party system - either side is the same, just a bit different on the talking points - - - basically, the same old shit !

News reports already seem to indicate that president-elect Trump is willing to accept new information and alter his 'campaign promises __LOL__ ' in order to get down to the actual business of running the country.

Joe Biden told NBC a “message” would be sent to Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged hacking, with the channel saying the CIA was preparing a retaliatory cyber attack “designed to harass and ’embarrass’ the Kremlin leadership.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov immediately denounced Biden’s remarks, saying Moscow would take precautions to safeguard its interests in the face of the increasing “unpredictability and aggressiveness of the United States”.

Keep drinking your PeeCee kooolaid while ignoring the truth dude.

http://fusion.net/story/17321/...

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/fbi...

And as for banning all muslims, why is it you lefties "conveniently" never quote what he ACTUALLY said:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/07/...
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," a campaign press release said.

Can you even now see the "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," part" or are you morons always gonna live in denial and keep leaving it out in a lame attempt to divisively make it sound like he meant it to be permanent?

In my opinion, a good president should put Americans first and is what the anyone filling the role of President is MORALLY OBLIGATED to do. History has already proved that the whole notion of putting Americans first is something that Hillary cant even get her head around (other than in well-rehearsed sound bites) let alone actually do. Lets not even put Hillary and Morals in the same sentence because even you must see how absurd that is. Pretty much everything she's already done as Secretyary of State comes down to to putting American lives second for her own personal convenience, power, or financial gain, most usually but not always through the Clinton Foundation.

Don't forget that Hillary has ZERO issues with banning political speech that she doesn't like... Fascism - the meeting of Corporate and Government power, and using the result to further those wielding the power - is embodied in the Clintons.

Wait until anti-science folks realize this is GMO.

Wait until Trump supporters find out that soybeans make you gay.

http://www.wnd.com/2006/12/392...

"the vast majority of terrorists in America are white"

I suspect you are trolling, but on the off chance that you are serious:

Only if you redefine the meaning of the word terrorist. In the last 16 years, virtually every terrorist attack in the US and in fact on the planet has been radical Islam in origin. Not sure how you square that circle.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/big...

https://www.thereligionofpeace...

Deranged gunmen with a history of mental illness and road rage/workplace violence do not count as terrorism, no matter how hard you squint at it. Those are baked into our society and something that we can work on with involuntary commitment reform and more effective policing. Terrorism is an external threat created and bred by Islamist countries to deflect the internal anger over their own deficiencies onto the American people.

This isn't the first time she had physical issues, there was also this one:

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/uns...

And I seem to remember hearing she collapsed at some other point, but I may be remembering the same incident.

Also, she claimed to the FBI that she did not recall taking the classified information briefing that the state department has records of her taking yearly. How could someone possibly forget taking that training when it is a yearly activity?

Her having possible health issues isn't just something the Right is making up, there are many indications. You can also try to claim that this survey was biased, but Doctors should be able to identify people having serious issues and trying to hide them, it is kind of part of the job:

https://politics.slashdot.org/...

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/911...

People are fawning all over it. Of course, some cynics have struck back:

http://www.amerika.org/politic...

And yet Trump is the one who keeps saying "the only way I can lose is if the election is rigged".

Exhibit A.

Seriously, you cited WND?

WND Exclusive
Are biblical 'giants' poised for comeback?
Upcoming conference to explore evidence

Typically, I don't push attacking the source but WND is about as reliable a supermarket tabloid.

[Republicans are] all owned by corporations and do their bidding.

Have you been avoiding the news recently?

Google Clinton and "pay for play", or Clinton and "foundation", or Clinton and "Wikileaks". (Or just wait a week or so for that last one.)

Here's cash flowing into the Clinton Foundation from corporations benefiting from selling Uranium to Russia.

Here's cash flowing into the Clinton Foundation from corporations benefiting from selling dual use technology (private and military uses) to Russia.

Here's $17 million that disappeared from the Clinton Foundation.

We've complained for years that the political elite is owned by the corporations, and that there's no difference between having a D or R after a candidate's name.

Don't blame corruption on just the Republicans, it's not intellectually honest and distracts people from the true problems.

[Republicans are] all owned by corporations and do their bidding.

Have you been avoiding the news recently?

Google Clinton and "pay for play", or Clinton and "foundation", or Clinton and "Wikileaks". (Or just wait a week or so for that last one.)

Here's cash flowing into the Clinton Foundation from corporations benefiting from selling Uranium to Russia.

Here's cash flowing into the Clinton Foundation from corporations benefiting from selling dual use technology (private and military uses) to Russia.

Here's $17 million that disappeared from the Clinton Foundation.

We've complained for years that the political elite is owned by the corporations, and that there's no difference between having a D or R after a candidate's name.

Don't blame corruption on just the Republicans, it's not intellectually honest and distracts people from the true problems.

You mean this Muslim Brotherhood Princess?

In a nutshell – quoting former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy writing at National Review this week – Huma Abedin “worked for many years at a journal that promotes Islamic supremacist ideology that was founded by a top al-Qaida financier, Abdullah Omar Naseef.” That would be for at least seven years (1996-2003), by the way, during which Abedin also worked for Hillary Clinton.

Let this sink in for just a moment. The journal Huma worked for – which promotes Islamic supremacism and was founded by al-Qaida financer Naseef, who also headed the Muslim World League, a leading Muslim Brotherhood organization – is called the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. It was edited first by Huma’s father, Syed Abedin, and now by her mother, Saleha Abedin. Saleha is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood. Mother Abedin also directs an organization (the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child) that comes under the umbrella of the Union for Good, another U.S.-designated terrorist organization. As McCarthy reminds us, “the Union for Good is led by Sheikh Yusef al-Qaradawi, the notorious Muslim Brotherhood jurist who has issued fatwas calling for the killing of American military and support personnel in Iraq as well as suicide bombings in Israel.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/hum...

You mean this Muslim Brotherhood Princess?

In a nutshell – quoting former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy writing at National Review this week – Huma Abedin “worked for many years at a journal that promotes Islamic supremacist ideology that was founded by a top al-Qaida financier, Abdullah Omar Naseef.” That would be for at least seven years (1996-2003), by the way, during which Abedin also worked for Hillary Clinton.

Let this sink in for just a moment. The journal Huma worked for – which promotes Islamic supremacism and was founded by al-Qaida financer Naseef, who also headed the Muslim World League, a leading Muslim Brotherhood organization – is called the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. It was edited first by Huma’s father, Syed Abedin, and now by her mother, Saleha Abedin. Saleha is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood. Mother Abedin also directs an organization (the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child) that comes under the umbrella of the Union for Good, another U.S.-designated terrorist organization. As McCarthy reminds us, “the Union for Good is led by Sheikh Yusef al-Qaradawi, the notorious Muslim Brotherhood jurist who has issued fatwas calling for the killing of American military and support personnel in Iraq as well as suicide bombings in Israel.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/hum...

He did mostly likely did commit suicide from shame of breaking the law for the Clintons over whitewater. Search warrant granted 7/20/93, vince foster commits suicide 7/20/93, search warrent excuted on 7/21/93 (documents removed on 7/20/93) http://www.judicialwatch.org/w... . Investigation into him just stopped because well he was dead. Doesn't help the Clinton's did some really shady shit in removing documents from his office after he died. Doesn't help their case either when one of the prosecutors on Starr's team resigned in protest because the whole investigation was botched. http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/vin...

Well, that makes their reluctance to engage in sexual activity quite understandable.

Maybe we should put them on a slippery slope?

I find the idea that lack of money makes people celibate rather odd. If that were hte case, the great depression of the 1930's should have made foro birth rates near zero.

Another possibility is that many young men have checked out altogether. https://www.lifesitenews.com/n...

http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/men...

https://www.quora.com/Are-men-... Men giving up on women pisses women off http://rense.com/general49/fal...

You can google men giving up on women and get a hellava lot of links.

A big problem today is that normal males have been scared off from females. Sad to say, the bad ones haven't. But I watched a show recently where a group of young women were asked if being asked on a date by a man was sexual harassment. To a women, they said if you didn't want to go out with that guy, it was sexual harassment. Well now, isn't that cute?

That pretty much sums it up. Feminism has succeeded on a number of fronts, but ended up way over reaching. Normal males have been pretty well cowed. Most males would like a relationship, but when you can be committing a crime for the simple act of asking a woman out, you've lost from the start. Russian roulette. Perhaps a Pyrrhic victory?

Another woman in an NPR interview made the comment, when a friend went with her to a coffee shop in Seattle, and was reaking at the Butch women there. She told her friend Don't worry - These are just the women who have become men, because men won't. Deal with it.

Having married at a different time, to an alpha chick who has gone on to have asucessful career, the previous example of a liberated woman. we get along just fine, and as equals. But in today's atmosphere, where men are as likely as not considered public enemy number one, I can say that I would be one of the guys opting out of any relationship with women. I could spend my money on what I like, do what I want as long as I avoid women, and avoid all of the pitfalls of marriage and children and divorce and child support. It really isn't worth it.

It sounds terrible, but hey, in a country where all men are considered at best latent rapists and child molesters, who in the hell in their right mind would want to take a chance interfacing with the opposite sex?

And by the way - for people who want to claim that money = ability to engage in sex, my SO and I managed quite well when we had virtually nothing.

I particularly enjoyed how Clinton paid for this message with ill-gotten proceeds from Russia via a backdoor uranium deal. The scummy treasonous bitch is trying to pin shit on Trump while rolling in Russian money like a pig in shit.