Slashdot Mirror


Geeks in Suits

This weekend Hemos & I went to California for Chris and Christine's wedding. Congratulations to both of them. It was a great ceremony and we're both super happy for ya... buuuut that's not the point of this story. What follows may frighten you, but it must be exposed. Geeks in Suits. Yes it's Rasterman, Mandrake (with Tammy) NeTTwerk, Horms, Kevin, Hemos and yes it's true, me: CmdrTaco (note: this is the first time I have ever worn a suit). Thanks to OctobrX for the pics, you can see more on his site. Update: 01/25 01:49 by CT : And sorry about those broken links. Email x@themes.org and tell him he's dumb ;)

251 comments

  1. Nettwerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get his number he is a hunk!

  2. Open Source Honeymoon Videos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has gotta be a preview to the Open Source Honeymoon Videos sure to be coming down the pike.

    E.
    Own nothing, be unoriginal, copy it all and they'll call you a saint.

  3. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A wedding? So?

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who that is right? Thanks to VA, he's richer than you will EVER be. All this proves is that a total geek like that can get a hot girl like that if he's richer than fuck.

      Screw that - I'd go out with most of the "geeks in suits" in those photos based on looks alone, if I didn't have a nice geek guy of my own already. And that's not counting that I go for personality and intelligence first.

      Money, on the other hand, is sort of a turn-off. I don't know if I'd feel comfortable with a guy who made much more than I did, and I don't make much.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. We can't do tech stuff 24/7/366.

      Totally void of any feelings of romance and love?

      I thought so.

      *WARNING! CRAPPY SIG BELOW*
      Me is a serious biiiitch :o) But, a cute bitch. There is a difference! Accept only the real deal!

    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can remember a day when the people reading /. had more intelligence than the average ape. the stories posted anymore have no meaningful content whatsoever. should i request a posting that when i got up my nutz itched like i got crabs from a crackwhore last night? that would teach people more than the last few stories that have been posted. you can go ahead and read all you want, i promise that you have made yourself dumber by having read it.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone that thinks "love it or leave it" is a fucking stupid philosophy, maybe? if slashdot is a community, certainly members of the community can help decide what they find acceptable or not?

      or are you just a slashdot fanboyee that thinks if hemos shits on a plate it's gourmet?



    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The average Slashdotter seems genuinely to think that the entire 'Net could be run on beige x86 boxes running Linux."

      You mean it can't?

    6. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHEN WILL NATALIE PORTMAN GET HER OWN ICON?!?!?!?!

      DAMNIT!

    7. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I love your attitude (not shared by many in my estimation).
      Where do classy ladies such as yourself prefer to hang out?

    8. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Now here's something for you to ponder over: meta-moderation. If you're doing it correctly, it probably takes from about 2 to 5 minutes to complete (depending on how many Natalie Portman trolls there are). So, all these Slashdotters with accounts go and diligently fill it out. When? Well, a large proportion of them probably do it when they are at work. On their company's time. What do they get? Nothing. Used to be karma points, but now ... absolute zero. So, Slashdot has a large number of people working for them, paid by other companies. Sweet deal for Slashdot!

    9. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who that is right? Thanks to VA, he's richer than you will EVER be. All this proves is that a total geek like that can get a hot girl like that if he's richer than fuck.

    10. Re:Who cares? by Alan · · Score: 1

      I donno, maybe Hemos's butt pimples *should* go under the science category...

      :)

    11. Re:Who cares? by Yakko · · Score: 1
      After all these years, I should be practically numb to this all, however. . .

      It's not enough that I feel rather under-appreciated at work (amongst other things), now I get the impression that I'm doing nothing with my life... hrrm... Congratulations are in order for everyone who's gotten the courage to marry. I know I'll *never* marry. I used to want to make something work, but I no longer think it's worth it to pursue even a relationship, much less marriage. I'd rather acknowledge that something is impossible rather than make an idiot out of myself trying to convince myself otherwise.

      Hats off to those who at least try to make things work... I know I'd have no clue or patience for it.

      (Oops... this was in reference to those who actually make this community thrive. My existence in that respect is debatable.)

      --

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    12. Re:Who cares? by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we can arrange to have a blood sample taken. Then we can clone her. Would that be a news story worthy of SlashDot? ;)


      Bad Mojo

      --
      Bad Mojo
      "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
    13. Re:Who cares? by Jonathan+White · · Score: 1

      For exceedingly large values of soon I guess....

    14. Re:Who cares? by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      Well the closest I could think of would be "Slashdot"...
      Hay maybe we should e-mail CmdrTaco and tell him he is OFF TOPIC :)
      Ohhhh he's gona hate me... :)
      But this isn't news.... not to me...
      Accually I think this kind of artical is neat but it SHOULD be in a topic fitting to it...
      It should be "SlashCrew" for personal stuff reguarding the slashdot crew...
      Some of us LIKE the personal touch.. some of us don't... Slashdots design alows us to filter a tad so maybe that should be something we should be allowed to filter... hmm?

      Just a thought

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    15. Re:Who cares? by Afterimage · · Score: 1
      Hey, I'm interested. Huzzahs for Chris and Christine. Good luck. 'Sides, it's probably the only time we'll ever have *proof* of Malda and Hemos in suits. Notice though, the suits looked good.

      Maybe that's why I'm resistent to wearing anything snazzier than flat-front khakis and solid color t-shirts to the office. Wearing a suit to an in-house meeting makes the times I intentionally dress up for special social occasions less special. So, thanks to my employer for tolerating jeans and black t-shirts on those really off days.

      --
      --Humpty Dumpty was pushed!
    16. Re:Who cares? by Freedent · · Score: 1

      Ok, you don't care about the subject being discussed. Fine. BUT you couldn't leave it there. You took the time to hit Reply, Write out a post to complain, and submit.

      If you don't care, SHOW YOU DON'T CARE. Don't clog up the discussion with complaints! That annoys the people who ARE interested.

      Well, just to point out, you took the time to reply too. :)

      Anyways, I see nothing wrong with this guy complaining. The thing is, there's a lot of content on this site that could be better catagorized. Perhaps this kind of stuff could be placed under a "humanity" or "personal" or "people in the online community" category. That would allow those of us who only want a certain type of story to avoid that which we don't want. I'm happy for whoever got married, but this is in no way my social community. My social community exists in my familly, at work, with my friends from school and in the university I'm attending. Slashdot is part of what we'll call my geek sphere, and I don't really care to read about other people's weddings, or about other people wearing suits. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be posted to Slashdot, I'm just saying that there should be a way for me to avoid that kind of thing.

      As for all this bullshit about how it's just Rob's site and he can post anything he wants to it: This site is paid for in part by the advertising, and wouldn't be here in its present form without the readership. Without the massive volume of traffic from people that come here because they want a certain category of information or news, Andover never would have bought the place. Rob can post anything he damn well wants to to this site, but it's always in his or Andover's best interest to provide a mechanism for people to continue to use slashdot for what *they* want to use it for. If people don't complain, how is any site editor going to know what they want? I say it's better for them to post to the story than to take it to email. Transparency is always a good way to go in issues like these.

      2 cents etc.

    17. Re:Who cares? by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Ill restate my opinion on this, if you dont care about it, dont click "Read More...", it would take you less time and energy to skip the article then goto it, read it, and then post a flamebate reply. I know this could be applied to this post to, oh well.

      I like the article though :) Couldnt get through to the pictures though, dont know if the sites /.'d or our school sysadmin is playing with my connection again. (Weee...Bess) Congrats to Chris and Christina =) and a haha to Taco, had to dress up :P

      Eraser_

    18. Re:Who cares? by vilms · · Score: 1

      Right. "Dog bites Man". "Fat Nerd marries Unhinged Girl" it's lovely, and I must get round to doing it sometime, with the missus. Love, vilms

    19. Re:Who cares? by emerson · · Score: 2

      Nothing reinforces one's point better than a quote from a fantasy vampire novel, no, really....

      In response to your points:

      --I get what I pay for.

      This typifies the what-can-I-get attitude that's taken over Slashdot and the Open Source universe since it started making news.

      I don't just GET from Slashdot. I post here. I am a content generator for the site. I am part of what people come here for. I'm not a mindless content consumer. I help shape this site in my own tiny way, and as such feel entitled to criticize when the site is being misadministered in my opinion.

      -- Grab the tarball and start one of my own.

      Well, first, the tarball isn't available in any real sense. Second, I don't want to make a fork, I want to contribute positively to the primary tree.

      -- Whining doesn't become me.

      "Whining" is a lazy man's name for "Bug Reports."

      -- Who was the jerk that gave me a +3?

      Gasp, shock, horror, someone that thinks that criticism of Slashdot isn't innately bad?

      --

    20. Re:Who cares? by Accipiter · · Score: 2
      You know, it's comments such as yours that bother me.

      Ok, you don't care about the subject being discussed. Fine. BUT you couldn't leave it there. You took the time to hit Reply, Write out a post to complain, and submit.

      If you don't care, SHOW YOU DON'T CARE. Don't clog up the discussion with complaints! That annoys the people who ARE interested.

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    21. Re:Who cares? by warpeightbot · · Score: 2

      In the immortal words of Lestat the Vampire,

      "Louis, Louis, Louis, stop whining!"

      After all, you get exactly what you pay for.

      If you don't like it, grab the tarball and go start one of your own. Whining doesn't become you. (btw, who WAS the jerk that gave him a +3??)

    22. Re:Who cares? by dieMSdie · · Score: 2

      Thanks Jeff! Glad to know you guys DO care enough to read the comments and occasionally post (but not often enough!)

      Congrats to the Happy Couple.

      As for the earlier poster above...

      Why don't all you whiners go somewhere else and start your own "News for Nerds/Stuff That Matters" site? I happen to like Slashdot just fine the way it is, and I think that Rob/Jeff/et al are doing a pretty damn good job keeping it up with the tremendous growth in popularity of Slashdot over the past year.
      Unfortunately, with that growth comes an influx of children, Microsoft Apologists, Linux-Haters, and other net-dreck. I guess that's the breaks though.

      --
      Don't throw your computer out the window, throw the Windows out of your computer!
    23. Re:Who cares? by Hemos · · Score: 3

      Tranquilo vato - The Solaris story will be coming soon.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    24. Re:Who cares? by emerson · · Score: 3

      Well, Slashdot has "topics," that we're allowed (nay, encouraged) to filter with user preferences, and when something's posted in a horribly incorrect topic ("news," in this case), the value of the site lessens, because the functionality doesn't work as advertised.

      I don't care if Hemos posts pictures of the new pimples on his butt every day, as long as they're not stuck into some topic I'd otherwise be interested in, like 'news' or 'science' or the like. Isn't there a 'geeks in space' topic that this would have been better suited for?

      And yes, it's not just "News for Nerds." It's also "Stuff that Matters." Which this story isn't.

      --

    25. Re:Who cares? by dattaway · · Score: 3

      I mean, really: who cares?

      Its people who make technology happen and its good news to see the faces of people who make this community thrive get married and start a family. If you have wedding pictures and other good news, I'd sure like to see it. It just brightens my day a little to see those in this community doing good things with their lives.

    26. Re:Who cares? by Plasmic · · Score: 3

      Do you have a clue what Slashdot is about? It isn't _just_ News for Nerds. It's about a site that has all of the stuff that Rob is interested in on it (and then some). This particular event interests Rob. He probably doesn't care whether or not you care. It's interesting to some of us, just like every other story (some I ignore, some are neat, some are stupid, etc.).

      I'm not ignorant enough to think that every story on Slashdot is going to be so grand that I can sit around whimpering "who cares? so what?" to anything that's less than amazing. So why are you?

    27. Re:Who cares? by Surak · · Score: 4

      Hey, y'all're missin' the point!

      That guy ended up with this girl. This proves that even total geeks like this guy can end up with a hot girl like this! :) This is "News for Nerds" right?

      :)

      *ducking*

  4. Check out the secret special guest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Fixed Links, Ripe For The Clicking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Fixed Links, Ripe For The Clicking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mhmhmhmhmhmhmhm.... masturbation!

    2. Re:Fixed Links, Ripe For The Clicking! by aTRaTiCa · · Score: 2

      Oh yay... more masturbation material!! heh

      --
      ------- What exactly is real?
  6. Where's Roblimo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was he too busy [driving his yellow (red) cars, posting inappropriate articles on slashdot, and crying about being flamed] to make it?

    1. Re:Where's Roblimo by Peale · · Score: 2

      Was he too busy [driving his yellow (red) cars, posting inappropriate articles on slashdot, and crying about being flamed to make it?

      Of course not, silly AC! Someone had to chauffuer the newly married couple around, didn't they?

      I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
      what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'

  7. funny that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the scoring system for this one. the first person to complain about a 404 gets a 0, everyone else gets a 1, and the one guy who pointed out that this is 'stuff that matters' gets a one, while the guy who points out that our lovely webmasters are a bit homely gets a 2. Is there any rhyme or reason, or are these scores entirely ex rectum?

  8. Re:Cute Dress, Rasterman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, seems like i recall such a thing. i promise if used enlightenment there would be!

  9. Dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow I didn't know you guys were such dorks. Should have stayed underground.

  10. ... what the -fsck-. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dear god, you should be shot.
    It's not as if you're a crack addict, and you're looking for the slash code to use as your next fix -- though I wouldn't put it past you.

    ...may the bus that hits you not kill you on impact.

    1. Re:... what the -fsck-. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note: this was in response to that foobar'd AC rambling on about about chicken suits or something.

  11. 404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    404'd. Nice one.

    1. Re:404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Someone goofed on the URL. The correct one is here.

  12. Missed a spot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey CmdrTaco, i think you missed a spot with the razor this morning. :-P

  13. Re:Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    d00d, t4c0 is t00 k3wl 2 b an 4g3n7!!!

  14. Re:Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First reply to comment 150.

  15. 404 Not Found - Netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Found

    The requested URL /photos/Chris_and_Christinas-Wedding/ was not found on this server.

    Care to fix this?

  16. Re:Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First reply to comment 160.

  17. Re:Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First reply to comment 170.

  18. broken links! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of those links are broken.

  19. Re:CHRIS AND CHRISTINE NAKED AND PETRIFIED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and i have the perfect gift idea... AN AIBO!

  20. This is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PID=999

    this is only a test

  21. gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't that be a petrified and naked AIBO???

  22. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick note... I moderated this comment as funny, and I just didn't want you to think that I thought you weren't serious or something. It really was quite insightful. However, your comment did make me laugh, and I figured it was better than whatever negative label had been slapped on it.

  23. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn! I forgot this would undo my moderation... oh, woe is me. anyway, sorry about that, chief.

  24. Re:Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mae young is gross. I wanted to see ivory's puppies.. anyone else think that christine looks like luna from wwf?

  25. Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine them having sex, that's worse than mae young at the royal rumble.

  26. Hey Chris! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, your mullet kicks ass!

    More information is available regarding your soulmates.

  27. If a big ol geek like that got that hot chick to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..marry him, I'm definately doing something wrong.

  28. True Love.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello All, I've just come home from the pub, and read this before going to bed (UK time). I think it's really fantastic that Chris and Christine have found someone that they really love. Brilliant. Beats a millenium's worth of compsci stories!

    1. Re:True Love.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a freaking brit would say that

  29. Who gives a flying fuck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..what geeks wear at a wedding?

  30. GPL VIOLATION - ./'ERS CALL TO ARMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    OK MALDA, YOU MADE FUCKING MILLIONS FROM US SO FORGET THESE CHICKEN-SHIT WEDDINGS AND FORK OVER THE FUCKING CODE.

    AINT IT JUST AMAZING. ./ PISSES AND WHINES AND BITCHES AND INSULTS ANYTHING CLOSE SOURCE WHILST ./ IS AS CLOSED SOURCE AS MICROSOFT

    JUST HOW MUCH FUCKING STOLEN CODE IS MALDA [AB]USING??

    1. Re:GPL VIOLATION - ./'ERS CALL TO ARMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's where you are, man. ./ is always right where you are...

    2. Re:GPL VIOLATION - ./'ERS CALL TO ARMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, what is ./? www.dotslash.org?

  31. Re:Slashdot Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always liked the "Ladies and Germans" the Red Guy does in Cow and Chicken...

  32. looks like the fat one out of penn & teller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did quite well for himself.

  33. Suit and boots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Congrats to the happy couple. Now,note: this is the first time I have ever worn a suit).

    I wear a suit every day. Why are so-called geeks incompatible with suits? In fact, why must computer types be "geeks" who don't wear suits? I find this stereotype grossly offensive.

  34. Re:Slashdot Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "eye"

  35. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot in "full of useless, irrelevant shite" *unshocker*

  36. wE nEEDZ pICZ oF tHE bRIDE nAKED... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... aND pETRIFIED!@#!@#!@#
    oH, aND mAYBE tHE cHEEKY sUCKE^H^H^H^H^HgROOM tOO!

  37. yeah, what about gray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the entire net could be run on transparent boxes running linux, but beige ones would overheat due to um, rays from Venus.

  38. Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is CmdrTaco an Agent?

  39. Re:CHRIS AND CHRISTINE NAKED AND PETRIFIED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... stone being the only thing that doesn't run away from you (and then obtain a restraining order), eh?

    You know, you would probably be a lot happier if you got one of those blow-up dolls and shot it full of expanding foam; Great Stuff is a good brand.You could actually live your fantasy.You could run your hands all over something that is just as compliant, unresisting, and lifeless as a marble statue.That's what you want, isn't it?Something compliant and lifeless, because you've been dissed by everything that lives?

    I hate to tell you this, but some things come about for a reason.Okay, I lied about hating it.Sue me.

  40. More evidence John Rocker was wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. Re:"Too Sexy For This Site" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I do my thing on the catwalk, yeah the catwalk

    I always like my version better....

    In the catbox! yeah in the catbox, I do my little thing in the catbox.

  42. Thanks Guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice way to promote using bandwidth for totally stupid stuff. If you wonder why we're all in the slow lane on the internet, just thank stupid sites like this.

  43. Re:I wish to one day be married! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay!

  44. BUT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is she open sourced? Please please tell me she is! I'd love to see her... uhm... "sources".

  45. FUCK ME THIS ISNT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS IS JUST FUCKING SADNESS WITH GEEKS INDULGING THEMSELVES WITH THEIR LITTLE NET ARRANGED WEDDINGS. SICKENING. LETS HAVE SOME REAL NEWS PLEASE? WHAT NEXT? RECEIPES?

  46. What a mess of narcissism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is a joke, not a news site. No self respected news site would _ever_ feature something like this.

    1. Re:What a mess of narcissism by skrumph · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. /. _isn't_ a news site. how many news sites are there out there? how many sites like this are there out there? if you want nothing but hard news, go read cnn or something...

      --
      fprintf(stderr,"poogas %d life",4);
  47. Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Hemos, are you married? What a good looking bunch of geeks! (Christine)

    1. Re:Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, why is a wedding worthy of mention on Slashdot? I guess I'm just not geeky enough to understand. Is it because geeks finding women willing to marry them is a newsworthy event? :)

    2. Re:Congrats! by Nailer · · Score: 1

      I echo those congratulations - Rasterman's needed that haircut for a real long time now... good going boy!

  48. Re:Slashdot Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentleman?????

    LADIES and gentleman. *shrug*

    and btw, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    *WARNING! CRAPPY SIG BELOW*
    Me is a serious biiiitch :o) But, a cute bitch. There is a difference! Accept only the real deal!

  49. Weddings for nothin' & Bar Mitzvahs for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the little faggot with the web page and IPO

    Yeah buddy that's his own hair

    That little faggot got his own jet airplane

    That little faggot he's a millionaire

    1. Re:Weddings for nothin' & Bar Mitzvahs for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got to install big ass hot tubs, Custom T3 delivery, We got to buy these leather couches, We got to buy these big screen TVs. (The Geek Compound)

  50. Is that you, Ermenegildo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, that tie on the right is a droolZegna/drool! It's tied in a passable four-in-hand (compare with a half-Windsor) FYI, choice of knot should properly be chosen to match the angle (the "splay") of the two sides of the shirt collar.

    (hint: informative)

  51. Don't Boycott. Just BLOCK THE ADS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Block the damn ads and they will be losing money everytime you visit!

  52. Broken links! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the pic's that embarassing?

  53. links gone already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops... shoulda double checked those...

  54. Liberals, Liberals, Everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friends, this evening when I brought up Slashdot, I had mentally prepared myself for the type of socialist dreck that usually finds its way onto the front page of our once-beloved web site. Instead, I find all of these revolting photos that demonstrate just how liberal our Slashdot has become. Never before have I seen such a congregation of slick, well-financed liberals. Everything is there, from the thousand-dollar suits and alligator shoes to the trendy Eurotrash sunglasses and fancy-schmancy lapel pins that so many liberals hold dear. Join with me, friends, and weep for our once-great Slashdot: she is beyond hope, and is quickly spiraling down into the fetid sewer of cultural decay.

    In particular, CmdrTaco looks like a very well-financed drug dealer; with his Antonio Banderas-style goatee and dark glasses, one can imagine going up to him and asking if he can "score some blow." Hemos appears to be very pimp-like; the only elements necessary to complete the illusion are a pair of scantily-clad prostitutes named "Cherry Forever" and "Wanda Quiverbush" hanging on each arm. Friends, these are the men that run Slashdot. They are in charge of selecting the editorial content that appears on this web site day in and day out.

    It is not surprising that this change of attire comes after the acquisition by Andover.Net. Andover is a well-known Washington liberal think tank, and it produces more liberals on a yearly basis than the National Organization for Women and CNN combined. If you need any proof of this fact, you must only look at the photos; no more questions will be necessary. Friends, I am confident that you will be seeing these photos show up in post offices across the nation within a year or so. "WANTED: FOR CORRUPTION OF CHILDREN", the posters will say. And I will be there to say "I told you so."

    These are dangerous liberals, my friends, and we must keep an eye on them. Thank you for your time.

  55. Re:Marital Bliss...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post the story. I want to know if Geeks can be happily married.

  56. Wedding Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently CmdrTaco bears a striking resemblance to one of those "HTTP 404 Not Found" error messages. Oh the humanity!

  57. Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://octobrx.com/photos/Chris_and_Christines-Wed ding/640/p1010073.640.jpg I got $50 that says Mandrake was stoned when this picture was taken.

  58. Lame Personality Cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that most readers don't give a shit about the lame-ass editors/founders and their equally lame friends.
    HINT: Slashdot is interesting IN SPITE OF Hemos, Taco, Roblamo, and friends. The handful of intelligent posters and the truly creative minds like Meept and the guy that write about statue porn are what is truly cool about Slashdot.

  59. Re:Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rob Malda wants to be a nigger, too?

    Relax people. I'm a nigger so I can say the word.

  60. Or even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Andover.Net: We masturbate more by 5 a.m. than most people do all day.

  61. Open Source Wedding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a sad fact of marriages in the United States that 50% of them end in divorce - that was until now. No, until now a GPL'd marriage has never taken place. This union will no doubt prove the power of the open source movement as this young couple grows old together.

    Oh, and taking pictures of pasty-faced geeks in the sun is a no-no. Only indoors.

  62. Re:Slashdot Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aye. just remind me.

  63. Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News flash, "CmdrTaco": We don't fucking care.

  64. What an ugly bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't fuck her with a stolen dick

  65. -2 troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -2

  66. -2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -2 troll

  67. -2 tr0ll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -2 tr0ll

  68. First time in a suit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you wear to 8th grade graduation?

    1. Re:First time in a suit? by aTRaTiCa · · Score: 1

      Actaully I wore a purple outfit with a piano tie. I was going for the Billy Joel attitude. ;P

      --
      ------- What exactly is real?
  69. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the first post, but already the pictures are slashdotted

  70. 5th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5th???? TROLL FUCK IT!!

  71. try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://octobrx.com/photos/Chris_and_Christines-Wed ding/

  72. err... ook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    very good... now what?

  73. I wish to one day be married! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :)

    1. Re:I wish to one day be married! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna go skip around in the snow in my undies. After I turn the Cheese to stone.

      The wonderful cheese
      It makes me feel pretty
      Till it turns to stone

  74. broken links all over the place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo, Taco

    Change Christinas-Wedding
    To Christines-Wedding

  75. Re:Slashdot Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK I DONT KNOW WHAT THIS GLP STUFF IS AND WHAT IS THE SOURCE BUT IS IT THE BUG GULP AND THE FORCE I DONT KNOW THESE THINGS ALL I KNOW IS LINUX TORVALDS IS MY HERO AND I WANT TO BE JUST LIKE HIME AND IF THAT MEANS HE WILL FORCE ME TO GULP THAN SO BE IT AND CAN I BOYCOTT SLASHDOT EVEN IF I DONT KNOW WHAT THE SOURCE IS CAUSE I REALLY LIKE SLASHDOT AND WANT TO HELP AND I THINK TACO LOOKED TOTALLY HOT IN HIS TUXEDO AND I WOULD JUST LOVE TO HELP IN ANY WAY I CAN JUST LET ME KNOW OK

    JUGHEAD

  76. -2trol1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -2trol1

  77. -2 tro1l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -2 -2 -2

  78. Re:adios! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARRG! I mean, Linux.com -- shoot!

  79. Re:No Arrogance Here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmmmmmm..... X10 Quickcam babe........

  80. Re:Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relax people. I'm a nigger so I can say the word.

    Too bad I'm not a nigger, otherwise I could say that word.

  81. i care about as much as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    natalie portman's clitoris

  82. Best Man was Don Knots from the movie Takedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN Entertainment Story here Don Knots plays hacker Emmanuel Goldstein in the soon to be released movie.

    A bitch-slapping contest between Knots and JonKatz over who plays a hacker better in the entertainment world, ended in a simulated lesbian-lovemaking session and was declaired a draw.

  83. Re:Correct URLs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wedding party is now officially slashdotted! Congratulations and champagne!

  84. correct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    typical broken link. correct link

  85. Link Bad by amccall · · Score: 0

    Here are the pics
    I never thought I'd see the day...

    --
    ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
  86. the links by nemoest · · Score: 0

    To actually see the pictures the "a" in Christinas needs to be changed to an "e"...

    Here's the link I found to view all of the pictures...

    Wedding Pictures

    Nemo

  87. Here They Be. by predictive · · Score: 0
    The directory with the pics is at his wedding pic directory

    --
    So E is relatively prime to (P-1)(Q-1)... Odd, that.
  88. Moderation Shite by Ru610 · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck was I moderated down for this?
    At the time I posted this there were no replies
    which mentioned the correct URL.

    Thanks alot...

  89. Correct Link by Ru610 · · Score: 0

    The correct Link

  90. Re:I G0T THE B1G P1CTURE BUT 1TS ST1LL L0D1NG by el_guapo · · Score: 0

    someone PLEASE moderate this down before my eyeballs glaze over

    --
    mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
  91. haha by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    meaningless drivel like this gets a score 1?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  92. I G0T THE B1G P1CTURE BUT 1TS ST1LL L0D1NG by B1FFD00D · · Score: 0

    WHATS W1TH THU BIG 4OO K JPEG FILES?!?!!?

    THEY DOWNL0AD REALLY SL0W ON MY 24OO BAUD K-K00L M0DEM AND EVEN 0N MY FR1ENDS 69OO M0DUM 0R SUMTHIN

    AND MY V1C-2O CLUSTUR DOESNT KN0W AB0UT JPEGS 0R WHATEVER I NEVUR G0T WHUT HUFFMAN C0D1NG WUZ 1 0NLY RITE 1T 1N THAT .BAS 1NSTRUKT10N C0DE W1TH THU SYSTEM KUZ L0W LEVEL STUFFS IS FASTUR AND THATZ WHUT IT RUNZ AND NETWURKING WUZ REAL HARD T0 D0

    S0 MY FR1END W1LL HAVE T0 C0NVURT 1T T0 A K-K000L SECRUT PCX FIUL S0 1 KAN SEE 1T BUT 1 BET SHES A T0DAL BABE AND THATS WHY 1T WUZ S0 HARD T0 F1ND S0 1TLL BE WURTH 1T

    1LL TELL U H0W 1T GOEZ T0M0RR0W

    --
    I LEFT MY CELL FONE IN PRISON! KAN U HELP???
    1. Re:I G0T THE B1G P1CTURE BUT 1TS ST1LL L0D1NG by B1FFD00D · · Score: 0

      U D0NT LA1K 1T? D1D U READ 1T? 1M JUST TRY1NG T0 SEE THE K-K00L F1LE L0TS 0F THEM KULDNT GET 1T AND WHUTS R0NG W1TH UR EYEBALLS MAYBE U HAD T00 MUCH BUSH-L1TE 0R SUMTHIN

      --
      I LEFT MY CELL FONE IN PRISON! KAN U HELP???
    2. Re:I G0T THE B1G P1CTURE BUT 1TS ST1LL L0D1NG by B1FFD00D · · Score: 0

      U D0NT LA1K 1T?

      D1D U READ 1T? 1M JUST TRY1NG T0 SEE THE K-K00L F1LE L0TS 0F THEM KULDNT GET 1T

      AND WHUTS R0NG W1TH UR EYEBALLS MAYBE U HAD T00 MUCH BUSH-L1TE 0R SUMTHIN

      --
      I LEFT MY CELL FONE IN PRISON! KAN U HELP???
  93. Re:Tammy's Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    did she put out?

  94. Re:Who the hell are these people??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Chris DiBona works at VA and was one of the editors of the 'Open Sources' book. Nettwerk is San Mehat, architect of the Corel Netwinder and now working at VA also. Kevin is Kevin Lenzo, organizer of the YAPC (Yet Another Perl Conference) and a member of the Perl Mongers. Horms is Simon Horman of VA, who works on Fault Tolerance/High Availability and is speaking at the Linux Expo in Paris I think...

  95. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by emerson · · Score: 1

    Correction, it started ON Rob's personal homepage -- it since moved to its own site which is theoretically its own business interest, and Rob maintains a separate personal homepage still (linked from the front of Slashdot, no less) where this kind of thing would seem more appropriate.

    To me, at least, but who am I? I mean after all, it's not like this is supposed to be a _Community_ or anything. I keep forgetting that blind-faith hero worship of the infallible editors is not only de riguer here, it's actually heresy to suggest any other way of thinking.


    --

  96. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by emerson · · Score: 1

    Heh. I wasn't talking about Microsoft. Not even close. But you can make believe I was if you like. When what you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. (*grin)

    --

  97. Neo! by drwiii · · Score: 1
    Rob, you look like someone out of The Matrix with those shades on.

    That having been said, you should caption this picture with "Andover.Net Hitmen" and hang it up somewhere.

  98. Re:Slashdot Boycott by drwiii · · Score: 1
    "Nay".

    From what I heard, Andover has pulled someone from their regular line of duty to work on nothing but getting the Slash code ready for public release, so don't think it's not important to them.

  99. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 1

    > It's just the editors using Slashdot as a personal homepage

    Um, dude...

    You seem to be under the impression that slashdot *is* something other than a personal homepage grown past all reasonable size.

    It isn't. Chill out.

    -Mars

  100. Re:Sick of "We Don't Want Personal Stuff Here." by crulx · · Score: 1
    Hi "Who Cares?" guy. I'm Crulx! *grin* I wasn't trying to directly stab at you in particular, I just wanted to show what I thought /. was about. I'm sure it is the same with you.

    About that "human experience" thing, I just wrote a few paragraphs and it is way off topic. We'll save it for another time. Sufficed to say, that while relevant is relevant, I'm feel that everything is equally relevant. (which of course destroys the concept, I realize)

    As for a general editorial decline in /. , that may or may not be. But Rob posted this thread. As he has posted personal events in his and Jeff and the rest of the gang's life time and time again. And while there is nothing wrong with putting it on his homepage, there is nothing wrong with putting it up here either. You feel differently, which is fine. I can see your point. But my point is it is exactly having the /. crew posting what interests them on home site, including personal stories, that caused the success of /.

    As for the nation turning to Walter C for news, it was exactly this sort of television reporting style that persuaded the entire world that you could learn everything about a particular event in under 10 min. The fact is, you learn less about something because you saw it on TV news.(I.e. you think you understand it so you rarely go learn more about it. I could spend hours discussing why.)

    Maybe the /. gang needs to create a "personal story" icon and allow people not to read it. But I'm positive those who do not will loose something very wonderful about /.

    Crulx crulx@iaxs.net

  101. Re:Marital Bliss...? by mdxi · · Score: 1

    I was going to reply with a little story about my geeky marriage, but apparently that would be self-congratulatory, offtopic grandstanding, judging by the posts in these threads.


    If anyone really would liketo see it, just say so and i'll post the whole thing (although i think most of the old SlashNET crew, many of whom I recognized in the article (been a while, how ya'll are?) have already heard it.).

    --
    Posted with Mozilla
  102. Who ARE these people? by Quinn · · Score: 1

    Taco can post whatever he wants, but if we're all to be subjected to it, could we at least get a clue as to who these people are?

    "Hakeem and I took a sloppy dump today in Govind's outhouse. Click here for pictures." That's fine, but give us some background on Hakeem and Govind.

    --

    --
    #19845
  103. OK CmdrTaco - what's the suit? by draziw · · Score: 1

    First suite eh? Looks good. Lets here the /. suit story. Where, what, how, etc. ? :)

  104. Re:Can we put this in the Hall of Fame? by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    I dunno about a Hall of Fame, but for future reference, I've mirrored it. I wish there was some way to find the original author, but sadly, it was an AC. Oh well.

    http://cdslash.tdhosting.com/misc/too sexy.txt

    ~Sentry21~

  105. hunh? by Zen · · Score: 1

    I'm just curious what kind of a person's life revolves around getting the ever important next release of /. source. The only reason I can think of that it is imperative that this person gets the code immediately is if s/he operates a mirror /. site, which if anybody ever visited it & made it known to the real /., would get it ko'd pretty quick. I'm also sure that CmdrTaco is plenty smart enough to write ALL his own code & not borrow from anyone not employed on the team. Which would mean that they're not violating anything. Besides, he didn't make millions from us. THEY made millions WITH us. We didn't give them anything personally, besides a dozen or so clicks per person per day. I could keep going for a while, but I think staring at my monitor and waiting for my eyes to start noticing the refresh rate is more interesting than replying to your post.

  106. Re:Chris...Christine by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 1

    Well, let's see. I know a Sylvan & Sylvia (not married, but together ~4 yrs), a Phil & Phyllis (my gf's parents, happily married 25+ years), and an Alan and Keiko (which I guess don't sound that similar when you say them out loud, but they're married too).

    --
    spawn_of_yog_sothoth
  107. Babe in picture 61... by slouie · · Score: 1
    Mmmmm.. Fuzzy, but cute. What's her name?

    I demand satisfaction! Or at least a better picture.


    -S. Louie

    --

    "I may be Love's bitch, but at least I'm man enough to admit it."
  108. Tammy's Cool by whydna · · Score: 1

    Tammy's the coolest!!! I went to high school with her. She was always quiet, but cool... nuff said!

    Tammy Rocks!!!

    -whyDNA?


  109. Re:Slashdot Boycott by chromatic · · Score: 1


    I heard it was three people. :)

    --

  110. Is it just me, or did Mandrake look totaly stoned? by Dast · · Score: 1

    Hehehe. Looks like he had a great time. :) Good for him.

    --

    This sig is false.

  111. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by bmetzler · · Score: 1
    The average Slashdotter seems genuinely to think that the entire 'Net could be run on beige x86 boxes running Linux.

    That's nothing. The average Microsoft fanatic not only thinks that the entire 'Net could be run on beige x86 boxes, but that Windows NT 4.0 could be used 'for extra reliability'.

    -Brent
  112. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by bmetzler · · Score: 1
    I wasn't talking about Microsoft. Not even close. But you can make believe I was if you like.

    Nope, I took you to be brighter then that. I just thought that that was a natural extension to your statement.

    Of course, any reasonable person would use no less then Solaris to run the 'Net, myself included.

    -Brent
  113. Nay... by ph43drus · · Score: 1
    Give the guys some time. Do you do any programming, or have any vague idea what it is like? I'm not a great coder, but I've had a taste of the work.

    What seems to have happened is that Rob has put together slashdot in a rather hackish manner, and as such, the code is relatively undocumented, and with little directory structure. Commenting and cleaning code can take a long time, and with the relative complexity of /., it's taking a little while.

    Oh yeah, he still has a life (see this story), and you expect him to post stories all day. There are only 24 hours in a day, and believe it or not, we need sleep and some time to do other things.

    Get over it.

    slash v.4 will come. Have a little patience.

    Jeff

  114. Who caught the flowers? by thegrommit · · Score: 1

    Which one of you had the better hoops skills?

  115. Re:Who cares? You do. by Aphelion · · Score: 1

    There are at least two reasons why this is beneficial.

    This posting of pictures is akin to making a personal appearance-- we are told when Linus does so, even if it is (or was, in this case) to simply delay the announcement of Transmeta's chips. It adds a personal flavor to that which we want to know.

    And closer to home; being hackers, we are interested in how stuff works. This gives us a much better insight into how slashdot works-- the people responsible for it.

  116. Re:Marital Bliss...? by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1
    I think it's kind of a silly question to ask. Are geeks so far removed from ordinary human life that their marriages are something special? I'd certainly think not- I write perl for a living, I've got a dsl connection and run a server off it, I know my named config files, but I'm also engaged to a beautiful and intelligent woman.

    Maybe a better question would be, "Do anti-social people with highly focused lives have successful marriages?" And that's a question I think you could guess the answer to yourself.

    By the definition I just mentioned, though, I'm not a geek and my anecdotal evidence has no relevance to this thread.

  117. Congratulations by Master+Switch · · Score: 1

    I know it's been said before, but here is wishing you two a happy life filled with love and joy!

    -Master Switch

    --
    -Master Switch, one more element in the machine
  118. Re:Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by jawad · · Score: 1

    Durst has a lil' more meat on his bones... Rob's too skinny.

  119. The other users hit me for singing! by King+SPAM · · Score: 1

    I just had to begin singing out loud and all of a sudden I get these dirty looks. Why?

  120. Post it at photo.net! by MeanGene · · Score: 1

    First, congrats!

    Guys, why don't you upload the files to Philip Greenspun's server? See if his HP/AOLserver/tcl setup can be slashdotted! :)

  121. Who is she??? by mTor · · Score: 1

    http:// octobrx.com/photos/Chris_and_Christines-Wedding/64 0/p1010091.640.jpg
    Who is she?

    --
    GroundAndPound.com News and info for martial artists of all styles.

  122. welcome! by sar-fu · · Score: 1

    to the world of adults where sometimes you have to dress appropriately.

  123. Re:Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by Ensign+Nemo · · Score: 1

    hahaha. I had a rough day and that made me laugh out loud.

    thanks.

  124. Who cares? by bugzilla · · Score: 1

    I mean, really: who cares? I'm just reading this page in the seemingly useless hope that something relative to anything tech might come across and I have to see this? I have to spend more time reading user comments to find out stuff like "Sun is giving away Solaris 8" because the "powers that be" are stoned on the smell of the new leather interior of their lear jet.

    Is anyone listening?

  125. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by jslag · · Score: 1

    --
    The average Slashdotter seems genuinely to think that the entire 'Net could be run on beige x86 boxes running Linux.


    Nonsense! Haven't you read all the stories about cool cases?

  126. Re:Sick of "We Don't Want Personal Stuff Here." by Emilio · · Score: 1

    How would you have taken it if good old Walter had taken a quick minute to tell the country about the wedding of a friend that he attended over the weekend, complete with pictures? Would it have felt out of place? Would you have thought to yourself "What is he doing? He's flipped his lid!"

    When you watch, you are pretty much forced to see it. In this case, however, you could have just read the summary and skipped it. It takes no more than 3 seconds just to read and pass over it. He's definitely not forcing you to see it.

    Nevertheless, I see what you're getting at.

  127. Truly... by Rombuu · · Score: 1

    Stuff that matters...

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
  128. Re:Sick of "We Don't Want Personal Stuff Here." by Weeden · · Score: 1

    I would have to agree. I don't know if any of you still watch the local news station that is in your area. But when I watch mine I get a dose of "un-news". Every so often the anchors interject that a member of the News 9 (the channel I watch) team has just got married or just had a baby. Now this isn't news and they could have filled those couple of seconds (which usually are complimented with footage of the event) with "real" news, but they don't. It just brings some humanity into the community these types of media try to foster between their viewers/readers/listeners. The run the show and call the shots. If you don't like it ... skip it. Who cares, move on. No one forces you to read any of the articles on /., choose the ones you like and quit complainign about the ones you don't.

  129. Sounds like by Robert+S+Gormley · · Score: 1

    half of the content of American Psycho.... fashio tips from the 80s... (not that Zegna is, but you get the point) :)

    --

    Open Source. Closed Minds. We are Slashdot.

  130. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by Plasmic · · Score: 1

    Did it ever occur to you that Slashdot started out as Rob's personal homepage? Therefore, it makes perfect sense that Rob would continue to post anything and everything that interests him (not necessarily you)? *smack*

    (see my other comment)

  131. Re:Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by qqaz · · Score: 1

    Rob looks more like my neighbor.

    --
    sup :cool:
  132. Ok Taco, you asked for this! by Captain+Zion · · Score: 1
    Must... resist... Must... resist... Aaaargh! I can't. Ok, here it is.

    No offense intended, of course :)

  133. Proper URL by jrs47 · · Score: 1
  134. Re:adios! by Foogle · · Score: 1
    Go to linux.org for a mirror of the pictures.

    -----------

    "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

  135. Good looking Geeks. by Petor · · Score: 1

    Now, being a guy, I'm no expert on how attractive other males are, but I'd have to say that these are some pretty styling geeks.

    Ladies out there, tell us, is the long haired look of Mr. Mittnik sexy, or does the close cropped hemos look do it for you?

    Do the suits *really* do as much for you as you say they do?

    I'm asking for... uh... academic purposes, of course.

    No personal interest in picking up the H0tt-Chicks(tm) at all.

    Yeah.

  136. violence in the UNIX lab... by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    is not a hot topic of today's journalists... but it should be. All of us who've ever been in a UNIX lab know that there are times when violence is necessary.. say, in the case of errant MCSE's who decide to "reboot" machines when their monitors go awry. Or, when print jobs pile up because no one decided to check for error messages. Or, when people touch the monitors and get grease spots all over them. Or...

    --

    Insert mind here.
  137. shoot! by dfreed · · Score: 1

    Bang. (or for you perl fans "!")



    It's funny, laugh.

  138. Re:This is insanity. by Juln · · Score: 1

    The subject of this message is the rising frequency of posts decrying the criticism that message posters level at every kind of topic posted.

    "If you are posting a message on here complaining about the signal/noise ratio on Slashdot, think it over first." they say.
    "If you don't like slashdot, be our guest and leave. nobody is forcing you to come here." others intone.

    well, remember:
    you are about to become an emu, or maybe a wombat. Think it over. Check http://www.bekkoame.or.jp/~makino/ for more information on wombats and why they are dangerous, or why it is dangerous to become one.

    Um, as far as the signal noise ratio, seriously, it is too bad the petrified natalie portman grit pants person/people came over here once segfault stopped accepting comments.

    --
    Juln
  139. Geeks and "names" by Elbereth · · Score: 1

    Do people regularly go around introducing themselves as "CmdrTaco" and "Mandrake"?

    I'd die before I posted something about myself, calling myself "Elbereth" or something stupid like that.

    "Here are pics of Elbereth, naked and wet! Gross!" Nonono. I'm "Matt", not "Elbereth". Call me Elbereth in real life and you die.

    Why do geeks have this obsession with "cool" handles? How come nobody is ever "Mr. Pink"? Oh well.

    Why did I pick Elbereth? Because I was too bored to be creative and Melkor was already taken.

  140. Re:No Arrogance Here! by Gestahl · · Score: 1

    you know, your e-mail address would run faster if you used tail recursion.

  141. Re:Slashdot Boycott by markalot · · Score: 1

    Aye,

    I think you should boycott slashdot. Please take your post with you.

    mark

  142. The Working URL by whm · · Score: 1

    HERE is a URL that actually works for the pictures :>

  143. Yowza! Looking sharp, boys! :-) by asparagirl · · Score: 1

    Well, well, well! Hemos and CmdrTaco in *suits*? Will wonders never cease? :-)

    Serriously, y'all clean up real nice. This here geekgirl thinks you guys looked pretty darn cute. :-) Hope you had fun at the wedding, and good luck and best wishes to the happy couple!


    - Asparagirl

    --


    - Asparagirl
    asparagirl at dca dot net
  144. anti-social != asocial by jesser · · Score: 1
    Maybe a better question would be, "Do anti-social people with highly focused lives have successful marriages?"

    Most geeks aren't anti-social -- they don't go around killing people, or trying to disrupt society. Some are asocial, which simply means they tend to prefer being alone to socializing more than the "average" person.

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  145. Geek fashion by jedrek · · Score: 1

    Damn straight!

    There's no reason in the world a geek can't be dished out in Armani when going out for the evening. =)

    Seriously though, the jean and t-shirt thing is a bit played out. I own only one pair of jeans (for painting) and the only t-shirts I wear are undershirts. Usally it's slacks and polos, maybe a sweater... sometimes a sweatshirt, for when it's nippy out. It's not hard to look good and feel good in your clothes and not look like a uber-geek at the same time.

    Especially since everybody's rich from their IPOs =).


    Jay

  146. I suck by uninerd · · Score: 1

    Ok, fine- I realize that my karma is a large negative number. What is this a result of? It is largely from making dumb-ass comments like this one. But maybe, could it be that you bastards are prejudiced against me? I admit it, I don't read the articles before I post, I write too much, and i try to throw in cute catch-phrases and knee-jerk arguments on the off chance soem modertators will get their jollies off my comment. So BE IT!! I guess I will gladly and remaina bottom feeder. I guess I shoud have realized that I'm not cool here when I noticed that I am one of the few people who has not even STARTED my work on a masters in computer whateverthehell. Oh bloody, bloody... stomp upon my ego and consience- down moderate me now.

    The "Uni" in my name doesn't even have to do with UNIX!! It only looks liekt hat, and i chose it because I am a Unitarian!!!
    Oh well, I suck. Thanks for paying attention.

  147. Get the news first by Potatoswatter · · Score: 1

    This story was already on TacoHell.

    Where is my mind?

    --

    Check out Project Upper/Mute, an all-around awesome compiler fra
  148. oh no! by Potatoswatter · · Score: 1

    But it's already archived! For the first time I can think of, there is NO WAY TO POST ON TACOHELL right now!

    I guess now Malda's feeling the 14-day rule :v) .

    Where is my mind?

    --

    Check out Project Upper/Mute, an all-around awesome compiler fra
  149. Re:Slashdot Boycott by Super_Frosty · · Score: 1

    Aye. So: on Friday, I won't read /.

    --
    No comment at this time
  150. Re:"Too Sexy For This Site" by MattXVI · · Score: 1

    HA! This is your best yet! I am in awe. But.. what is a Harma?

    --
    When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
    -Tom Jones
  151. Re:Thank _GOD_.... by Freedent · · Score: 1

    Key word, started.

    Thanks for coming out.

  152. Re:From what planet am I? by WhyteRabbyt · · Score: 1

    Being a commited non-suit wearer, I had to respond. Okay I got the humour in the post, and this reply is maybe a bit pedantic, but I got sick a long time ago of hearing that I'd need to get a suit for interviews, to get a decent job, or whatever.

    Ive never worn a suit (I'm 33), and Im never going to. Full stop. I get married this summer, and I'm dressing the way I want to for that as well. Ive never wanted to work anywhere that meant I'd need to wear a suit, and I wont compromise on that. I can dress smartly but Ive never had to wear a suit to do it.

    Why do so many geeks/nerds/hackers/etc. dislike wearing suits?Or is there just a conspiracy among the media to make that seem so? ;-) (And yes, I've read the jargon files, among others.)

    Its probably real. But suits are nothing more than uniforms, and I'd guess that most hackers/geeks/nerds are pretty much non-conformists

    It seems like suits would be much sought after for a few reasons:

    1) Quality: Your OS is custom tailored, why aren't your clothes?

    They are custom-tailored; to my preference for comfortable, durable clothes

    2) Slickness: Your GUI is fashionable, why aren't you?

    Suits have been the 'business uniform' for decades. My clothes are might not be fashionable (although I'd dispute that suits actually are..) but they do refelect my own personal style

    3) Reuse: Your processes rarely raise a stink after running for days/weeks/months/years on end, but after 24hrs. those jeans and t-shirts are another story.

    Actually suits tend to get worn all week, dont they? And Ive known more than one person ware the shirt under it for days on end. Meanwhile, Im grown-up enough to remember to change my shirt every day, what makes you think that hackers/nerds/geeks aren't?

    4) Modularity: 2+ piece suits can load or unload modules as needed. Processor too hot? rmmod coat. Packets lost in the stream? rmmod necktie. Change in environment? insmod coat. Expecting PHB attack on port *:brainbox insmod necktie.

    Too hot? (Tis in this bloody room, the Origin server acts like a massive bloody radiator) Just wear a T-shirt...

    5) Efficiency: Since suits/shirts/accessories are interchangeable, there's no need to make your apparel statically linked. (Leave that space on /dev/closet for important things like hardwear^H^H^Hare)

    Everything goes with black... Black boots, black combat pants, black shirt. Viola...

    6) Emulation: Fool your boss, get a raise.

    But I want him to love me for my mind. Plus, he rarely wears a suit anyways.

    To me suits are a way of making staff into drones; interchangable lookalike units that fit into the company mechanisms. I value my independence and individuality too much to want to be part of that kind of machine. Whatever hacker/geek/nerd gene there is, in me its tied to the one that makes me want to behave, dress, think, work, believe in my terms, not somebody else's...

    --
    free experimental electronic music netlabel at www.viablehybrid.com
  153. Re:No Arrogance Here! by jsewell · · Score: 1

    Gee I wish I had a site that hundred of thousands of people watched for news. Perhaps I should create a geek gossip site for just this kind of stuff.

    If you think you can do better, be our guest and leave.

  154. Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by Spamizbad · · Score: 1

    I'm telling you. Either they're clones, or Rob
    lives a double life!

    Just picture Rob in a red hat turned backwards, and rapping about perl code.....

    PS: I think LB sucks, but Slashdot is pretty cool.

    1. Re:Rob Malda = Fred Durst (from Limp Bizkit). by gvonk · · Score: 1

      Just picture Rob in a red hat turned backwards,


      hmmmmm... Was that a pun?


      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  155. Change Christina to Christine by Suicyco · · Score: 1

    thats why the links are broken.

  156. On Slashdot, and Tolerance by _blueboy · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, sounds like the title to a Jon Katz article, doesn't it?

    While some of us may not appreciate ALL the articles posted on Slashdot, and may indeed feel that Slashdot has gone downhill in the past X months/years, please spare the rest of us the torture of reading the same comments everytime one of these articles is posted. We have been hearing the same things for a while now, like "This isn't news for nerds!" etc.

    If you do not like Slashdot anymore, don't visit. If you think it's still worth saving, consider whether or not posting comments like these is the best way to do this. Maybe a polite email to CmdrTaco is the best way to do things, instead of a flaming comment. Or at least indicate your support of some solution, like topic moderation, etc.

    And on the subject of the slashdot source, I realize that many people are getting quite upset, and with good reason. However it is their choice to release the source, and when they will do it. To CmdrTaco, Hemos, and all: please remember when posting stories criticizing the big companies, like Corel, for not sticking to Open Source ideals, that you are equally guilty.

    Thank you and good night.
    --

    --
    pdubroy AT yahoo DOT com
  157. Re:Who cares? (or Your all NUTS!) by profeti · · Score: 1

    This is what an IPO can do to people. I've noticed that the News is slower and the Stuff matters not so much. I suppose it's fine if people want to celebrate the moments of thier lives with others especially when they have a platform to do it. TV networks do this same kinda thing all the time; some jerk gets married, some pig is having puppies, blah blah. BFD, give me something useful or quit wasting bandwidth (I'm quite aware of the irony of decrying the waste of bandwidth by wasting some myself).

  158. Private stuff on /. is cool. by Crixus · · Score: 1
    Let me preface this by saying that I understand that slashdot has a target audience. But seriously, do comments like "Who Cares? Why should I care about your personal life." really need to be tossed around? Which one of you has not told someone else about your personal life?

    AMEN!

    Lord knows that my stupid web site contains plenty of silly photos of me and my friends. I happen to enjoy the occasional post that lets me see what these people that I'm constantly reading about, actually look like. It makes this impersonal form of communication a little more personal.

    I've been told way too many times by people that think they're 'normal' that the internet is too impersonal and that I must be some sort of 'closet-case' for actually enjoying it. When that happens I can actually point to photos like these and pretend I actually know them! :-)

    (I'm kidding of course, a mere mortal like me could never be lucky enough to know someone as cool as CmdrTaco and Hemos.)

    Keep those photos coming. But at the risk of souding like my father, a visit to the barber (for some of the others) wouldn't hurt! ;-)

    (DUCK!)

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
  159. ???!!! by gargle · · Score: 1

    What is a "Chris"? what is a "christine"? I have never heard of such things

  160. Chris...Christine by zeck · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it funny when two people with names like Chris and Christine get married? I guess it makes me a hick, but I get a chuckle out of that.

  161. 404 by Machina · · Score: 1

    Why don't you try this for the base URL.

    Now I gotta sit here and figure out who is who in the pics. AS if I didn't have enough time to waste at work today.

  162. check urls? by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

    am I the only one getting all the 404s?

  163. a roadie reunion? by Mr.+T · · Score: 1

    I'm sure congratulations are in order, but am I the only one who thinks that half of these guys look like ex-Def Leppard roadies?

  164. Schoolyard geeks of the future.. by skrumph · · Score: 1

    Imagine if this sort of thing gave way to like, action cards. "Geeks in Suits".. and kids in schoolyards started having fights over who got to be their favourite slashdot personality.. i can see it now. "I wanna be hemos!" "ah man, i had to be taco last time.. it's your turn!"

    --
    fprintf(stderr,"poogas %d life",4);
  165. Hot in California by [ella] · · Score: 1

    Tnx for pointing out it's hot&sunny in California, it's freezing here (Belgium)!!!
    But anyway... best wishes for the the happy couple
    The geeks in suits could've worn a Tux-tie ;-)

    --
    Mike
  166. Oh man!!! by el_guapo · · Score: 1

    Surely someone is giving CmdrTaco a serious ration of poop for posting a bad link. I don't mean this as mean spirited, it's just all the "Check those links!!!" admonishments in the posting area..heeheehee Coming soon to a browser near you http://www.straightpoop.org (it's totally broken right now, but I have a full time job anjd all...)

    --
    mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
  167. Re:Marital Bliss...? by Munky_v2 · · Score: 1

    Of course geeks have successful marriages. There are two reasons for this...
    1. We need someone to cook for us while were hacking away at the kernel.
    2. We need to have baby geeks to help us rid the world of idiots (or at least keep them dependant on us).


    Munky_v2
    "Warning: you are logged into reality as root..."

    --
    Jay
  168. adios! by [marathon] · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone saw themselves linked on /. and pulled their pictures.

    Naughty-naughty. We know they were there!


    --
    Failure isn't falling. Failure is staying down.
  169. Re:Marital Bliss...? by cahoon · · Score: 1
    "I predict that geeks do just as well as anyone else - no better no worse. There are those that succeed because two highly reclusive people fit well togethor and an equal amount that fail based on the same reasoning."

    Geeks do just as well as anyone else simply because they are real people behind their reclusiveness. Unless, of course, you are really screwed up in which case you're unlikely to find a mate anyway :^)

    --
    Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow. -- Linus's Law
  170. Multiple Resolutions by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
    Garunteed Geekness :-)

    Only geeks would have put the photos with different resolutions. I thought that was the first thing that tipped me off. As for geeks in cool threads. Must we as all geeks always be seen in T-Shirts and Jeans? I mean hey it's the apple way (erm thanks pirates of silicon valley) or heck even the regular athome geek way. But really are suits that bad. When you put on a suit are you less of a geek? Do you loose your geeknesshood (an ordained status among geeks granted through a ritual of sitting in front of the computer for days on end coding).

    Personally I don't mind getting all dressed up. Chicks dig guys in suits (thank you ZZtop). And well for girls I prefer a girl dressed up in a nice outfit to that of jeans and a T-Shirt.

    What you really don't want to see is geeks in swimming suits (many unmentioned use your own imagination reasons here)

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  171. closed source == GPL violation? by indrani · · Score: 1

    actually, last i recall there have been tarballs of the slash source kicking around, but i may have been hallucinating again. while i agree that the /. software should be open source (especially if it's "inspired" by GPLed software), calling the code "stolen" is rather reactionary. after all, if it weren't for code-reuse there wouldn't be much 'open source software'. borrowing, extending, alterating, and adapting old code is a time-honored tradition -- it's just that with OSS/Free software, the right to do this is recognized and protected. it's only amongst the "closed source", proprietary software cultures that you have a notion of code being "stolen": that is, being owned by anyone in particular. isn't OSS supposed to be about freeing us from these stupid notions of "intellectual property"? (moderators: yeah, offtopic, i know. i had to...)

  172. Nice Photo! by cparisi · · Score: 1

    You can "Command" my "Taco" any day!

  173. Congrats! by locutus074 · · Score: 1

    Many congratulations to both of you!

    --

    --
    We have fought the AC's, and they have won.

  174. oooh, Weddings are like BETA releases by SnError · · Score: 1

    Mom always told me life was like a BETA release...OK, so maybe I'm lying about that. While congratulations are in order, I fail to see where this has any realavence to anything even remotely related to geek news. I mean, it's nice and everything to see that two more people are happily married, but to the rest of us, it doesn't make a lick of difference. Post somthing interesting, intelligent and informative, not this "ball and chain" stuff that I see has made the top of the list. What's next guys? You gonna start a marital section?

    This is about as interesting as a Mac user web designing with pagemill.

  175. Re:Marital Bliss...? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    It is a little known fact that Geeks make the best husbands. There is an amusing article about this topic here.

  176. My Fave Slashdot Personality by yebb · · Score: 1

    I just love Hemos. He's my favorite. CmdrTaco is nice too, but Hemos is nicer. Yes, in case your wondering, I have almost completed my set of Slashdot trading cards!

  177. Slashdot Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Gentlemen,

    It is already the 24th of January, and the Slashdot source code is still nowhere in sight. For too long now, we have borne the unbearable. We have endured enough.

    I propose a Slashdot boycott, starting 12.01am lasting till 11.59pm, this Friday the 28th of January, Pacific Standard time. For the chance to change history, we shall for a day forsake our geek news.

    This being a revolution led by an AC, shall truly be an uprising of the masses. Come on all ye faceless ones, this is your chance to change history.

    All in favor say "Aye"

    AC

    1. Re:Slashdot Boycott by sumana · · Score: 2
      Wow. This seems like a good idea, if you're the type of person who is very much adamant about the open-source credentials of Slashdot.

      There's a few ways to get a person or entity to do something. First is rational persuasion. I think we've tried that. Second is nonviolent direct action. Boycotting would be one of those; posting in protest on /. is sort of a combo between the 1st and the 2nd, to me. Then there are the violent/coercive/unethical ways that do not respect the other entity's dignity/rights. I'm not for that.

      Thanks for the info on the Slashdot boycott. It's a good idea, if you feel that strongly. I'm not sure I do, but I'll think about it before Friday.

      Be warned: the publicity from the boycott might bring /. MORE traffic, thus cutting down on or eliminating the less-traffic aim of the boycott.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Microsoftam esse delendam.
  178. Thank _GOD_.... by emerson · · Score: 2

    Can we get a new topic, "self-aggrandizing non-news for rabid Andover-worshipping fanboyz?"

    Just so I could filter it out.


    . o O ( Wow, this'll probably get my first flamebait points, fun! Still, this is SUCH non-news or things-that-matter. It's just the editors using Slashdot as a personal homepage. What's next, "Rob's Aibo matures to 'Adult' Level -- click here for cute pix!!!?" )

    --

  179. To get to the pictures... by sterwill · · Score: 2

    In the URL, replace the string "Christinas" with "Christines" ('a' to 'e'). This will get you started.

    --

  180. Photography by adamsc · · Score: 2

    Was I the only one thinking a visit by photo.net would have helped a couple of those photos?

  181. Sorry hun. You're going to have to win the bread. by heroine · · Score: 2

    The joys of marriage. I have never seen a married couple which was happy. They work their asses off to appear happy but never are. For 4 years of engagement the wife has the whole patriarchy system structured like a swiss watch and the husband has spent 4 years of engagement trying to synthesize the financial resources of two. Then the certificate is signed, the husband continues to work like mad to impress the wife and provide, and the economy changes. One day the husband comes home with some bad news. The wife has to get a BSEE at the age of 40. The relationship goes down hill and it's another engineering student ranting about how life sucks da daaa.

  182. Re:Correct URLs by dattaway · · Score: 2

    Here it is in a point and click link.

  183. I disagree by nicedream · · Score: 2

    Actually, I agree with the first post...I couldn't figure out why this was on here, except as another ego spasm from Taco.

    Yeah I remember when /. was chips and dips, but those days are long gone, especially since they buyout by andover.

    What do you think tacohell and cmdrtaco.net are for?

    (This is not a flame against Rob or /., I still love the site...it just seems like this is out of place that's all).

    Brian

  184. Cute Dress, Rasterman! by grahamkg · · Score: 2

    I imaging there's already a Natalie Portman theme for Enlightenment, oui?

    Graham

    --
    Graham
    Linux - Fast Pane Relief
  185. Taco Hell by Pyro+P · · Score: 2

    Rob, are you sure you didn't mean to post this to Taco Hell instead?

    --
    If 90% of everything isn't crap, your standards are too high.
  186. Bull by tilly · · Score: 2

    I have been married for just shy of a decade and I have to tell you that you are wrong. Sure, if you buy into a set of social roles and just live that - well people aren't cardboard cut-outs. But if you realize that and work to keep a relationship alive - well I know people who are going strong for a lot longer than I have been married!

    Of coure you only get out what you put in...

    Cheers,
    Ben

    --
    My usual seat in the cluetrain is at A HREF="http://pub4.ezboard.com/biwethey.ht
  187. Those Pics Are Nice. Here's Mine. by Peale · · Score: 2

    For you Slashdotters out there, here are some pics of my wedding originally for Lewie, my best man (because we live so far apart)

    I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
    what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'

  188. Re:Marital Bliss...? by rueba · · Score: 2
    I predict that Geeks are more successful, based on the fact that Geeks don't have as much opportunity and interest in extra-marital affairs(among other things). They stay home a lot, are responsible, smart, logical, loyal. Girls might (apparently) not notice it, but those are perfect husband characteristics. Probably good wife characteristics too, I bet.


    Contrast this with a party-mad jock type of personality and you'll see my point.


    Also Geeks tend to improve with age, as they pick up more "normal" people skills and become generally less awkward to the point where you can't even tell they are Geeks. So basically if you marry a Geek he/she will only improve with age unlike some OTHER demographics out there. (Where are all those 'cool guys' fron high school now?)


    Thats my basic thesis, although I have no data.
    Obviously there are a lot of other factors involved, I just think that Geeks posses a lot of the qualities that could help in marriage.
    PS: I am thinking of someone like WOZ here not Kevin Mitnick.

    --
    The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  189. Re:Sick of "We Don't Want Personal Stuff Here." by bugzilla · · Score: 2

    Hi, I'm the "Who Cares?" guy. You make some very good points, and none that I can really argue with, except to say that I disagree with your statement that Slashdot is about the "human experience." You're getting a little close to demonstrating Heisenberg's Uncertainity Principle there. Show me an active web site that isn't an example of the human experience. But that's irrelevant here.

    My beef is with the editorial style used to decide what gets posted and what doesn't. I read this site daily for news. Just like we, as a country (US), used to watch Walter Cronkite for the nightly news. How would you have taken it if good old Walter had taken a quick minute to tell the country about the wedding of a friend that he attended over the weekend, complete with pictures? Would it have felt out of place? Would you have thought to yourself "What is he doing? He's flipped his lid!"

    Now, I agree that this whole internet deal is a "brave new frontier" and that all of the old rules don't apply, but please, God, tell me that relevance is still relevant! There are days that I have to check that I'm reading Slashdot and not Segfault.org!

    I don't know what the CNN tech editor's favorite technology is, but I know Hemos is all over nanotech - and I'm with him all the way. That's the kind of thing I love this place for - very real world stuff, like breakthroughs and news, not just stuff. Rob's got a home page, what's wrong with putting this story there? I'm sure he gets lots of hits every day since he's linked to right from the front page.

    If this story had been posted as something other as news I probably wouldn't have flown off the handle, but it was and I did. Maybe if Rob and Hemos spent more time actually running the site and not delegating the editorial duties to so many others, thereby diluting the quality, I'd just shut up.

    Anyway, I hope that the cloning technology hurries up and gets here so that we can have Rob and Hemos doing both the editorial work, site development and source release.

    Mike "insert smilies where appropriate" Loseke

  190. You got nuthin' on... by The+Iconoclast · · Score: 2

    THE DORKS IN BLACK !!!

    A wealthy eccentric who marches to the beat of a different drum. But you may call me "Noodle Noggin."

    --
    Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
  191. Who the hell are these people??? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

    Chris DiBona?

    Are NeTTwerk, Hormes and Kevin geek celebrities that I should know?

  192. Laughing out loud in the lab by sumana · · Score: 2
    GOD, that's funny! I met CmdrTaco at LWE this last summer, and imagining him singing "I'm Too Sexy For This Site" gave me the best laughs I've gotten today. Thank you, AC. You are proof that ACs ar valuable, too.

    God, that was funny.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftam esse delendam.
  193. Can we put this in the Hall of Fame? by Ted+V · · Score: 2

    Man, that's hilarious! Is there any way we can enshrine this? It would be a shame to forget about it just a few days later.

    -Ted

  194. 4 Sizes! by DGregory · · Score: 2

    Four photo sizes just in case you want some of those beautiful pictures on the background of your computer!!

  195. Re:Sorry hun. You're going to have to win the brea by MattXVI · · Score: 2

    Wow. You're depressing. All the married people I know are happy.

    --
    When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
    -Tom Jones
  196. Shocked! by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

    Boy, Nitrozac really prettyed you boys upo for your appearances in After Y2K, didn't she?

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  197. the Danger of Geek-Mating by SkulkCU · · Score: 2

    The practice of geeks 'mating' for life may not be dangerous in itself, but it is often a 'gateway' to more harmful activities. "Geek Breeding" has been a hot topic recently, and is often a consequence of geek mating. While some people allege that it will throw our society into social chaos, others insist that as long as the child can be provided with loving parents and high-bandwidth connection and its own static IP, it is a fundamental right of all bipeds (including geeks) to breed. A story off of the AP wire reports that Rep. Jean McGrath (R-Glendale, AZ) will introduce a bill tomorrow morning which will outlaw geek-mating in order to pre-empt the battle of geek-breeding and the "moral downfall which it represents."

    "The very fact that that a 'geeks' social nature precludes them from mating makes these very unnatural and unholy acts," she said.

    The NORN Organization for Recursive Names has called the proposed bill "outrageous". "If AOL/Time Warner/EMI users are protected by the law, we feel geeks should have the same right to repackage their DNA and release it under any license and name that they see fit." In this spirit, NORN is holding a 'Pro-Geeks 2.0' rally on the steps of the state capitol tomorrow.

    (Although this reporter, as all media analysts today, has no idea what any of this story is about, I will use my Word spellchecker, "save as HTML", and then ask our technology expert to place it on our website, despite his warning that by doing so I will only deepen the resentment and disdain that the online community has for me and the paper by displaying the lack of knowledge I have on the subject.

    --
    .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
  198. Re:Sick of "We Don't Want Personal Stuff Here." by ShinGouki · · Score: 3

    instead of a long winded counter-counter-counter-argument, i'll just refer you back to the last counter-argument...if you just want straight news, why not read the other weblogs that do basically the same stuff?

    there are those of us in the community who love seeing this stuff (btw, congrats chris :) even if it isn't strictly technological news, it's definitely _community news_ and for some of us here, it's most definitely stuff that matters.

    afaik, /. has never had the motto "news for nerds: purely technological stuff that bugzilla wants to see"


    -dk

    --
    -dk
    Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  199. No Arrogance Here! by coaxial · · Score: 3

    Gee I wish I had a site that hundred of thousands of people watched for news so that I could grandstand any ol' time I wanted. Perhaps I should create a geek gossip site for just this kind of stuff. ("Did you hear? Cowboy Neal went on a date! With a REAL WOMAN! Rumor has it was with the X10 QuickCam ``Babe''!")

  200. This is insanity. by Matt2000 · · Score: 3

    The subject of this message refers not to the news item, but to the non-stop and ever inceasing volume of ctiticism from message posters leveled at every kind of topic posted.

    "Less personal info. Less legal stuff. Less stuff about commercial software. Less opinion pieces from [whoever]."

    What are we left with? A bunch of dry news items about kernel releases and KDE upgrades. I much prefer the occasional personal piece from our online friends, or the occasional humourous new topic.

    If you are posting a message on here complaining about the signal/noise ratio on Slashdot, think it over first. You are about to become the noise, not the signal.

    Hotnutz.com

    --

  201. Marital Bliss...? by TheBeginner · · Score: 3
    This is kind of a question, kind of a statement, kind of a proposition. Like everything in my life, it can not be clearly quantified. Basically, it is this: are geeks suited for marraige? I am not asking if geeks get married for that is an obvious fact, but in fact, whether or not those marraiges are successful.

    Now please realize that I am not commenting one way or the other. For all I know, geek marraiges could be twice as successful as "normal folks" weddings (hey cleetus, where's that woman?). What I am wondering is if geeks do better, if so, why? If not why? And if you have no clue, what do you predict?

    To start things off, my theory. I predict that geeks do just as well as anyone else - no better no worse. There are those that succeed because two highly reclusive people fit well togethor and an equal amount that fail based on the same reasoning. I have absolutely NO hard data to back this up, but that's the point.

    --
    14 digits of Pi are all we need.
  202. Correct URLs by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3

    Replace "Chris_and_Christinas-Wedding" with "Chris_and_Christines-Wedding" in all cases.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  203. "Too Sexy For This Site" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5


    I'm too sexy for this site
    Too sexy for this site
    Too sexy, daaaaamn right

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    And I'm, too sexy for JonKatz,
    Too sexy for JonKatz,
    what's he think about that?

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    I'm too sexy for you trolls
    Too sexy for you trolls
    Go back into your holes.

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    And I'm to sexy for AC's
    Too sexy for AC's
    They wish they could write posts like these

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    I'm too sexy for Roblimo
    Too sexy for Roblimo
    Nobody ever liked himo.

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    And I'm too sexy for RedHat
    Too sexy for RedHat
    It is bloated dumb and fat

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    I'm too sexy for Trollmastah
    Too sexy for Trollmastuh
    His posts are inferior to mine, basta'

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    And I'm too sexy for your karma
    Too sexy for your karma
    Go post at ZD-net you harma

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    I'm too sexy for Signal11
    Too sexy for Signal11
    He dies but he doesn't go to heaven.

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

    I do my sexy thing here at Slashdot.
    Yeah here at Slashdot, yeah
    I post a lot of posts here at Slashdot.

  204. Sick of "We Don't Want Personal Stuff Here." by crulx · · Score: 5
    Let me preface this by saying that I understand that slashdot has a target audience. But seriously, do comments like "Who Cares? Why should I care about your personal life." really need to be tossed around? Which one of you has not told someone else about your personal life? Even if the setting didn't quite match, like Monday morning at work. Every single one of you does this in some way or another. You tell your Coworkers you went sledding for the weekend. Just because this site has many visitors, does that change things? Would anybody complain if this were on a web site that got only 20 people a day?

    Let me make a few points.

    1. The web is about communication. Pure and simple. It really doesn't do anything else except transmit knowledge from one place to another. CmdrTaco wished to communicate something about his life. This is no less, and no more, relevant than the DeCSS injunction posts because they both deal with the human experience.
    2. No one will argue that Hemos and CmdrTaco and the rest of the /. gang have given vast chunks of their life up to this website. In their little remaining time they do non /. things. They have in the past, and will continue to in the future hopefully, posted several of the (remaining after /. work ) personal events in their lives. This fosters a sense of community and gives greater value to all the posts because it gives you a connection to the crew that makes this possible. Again, they are communicating the human experience through mostly news, but other tidbits as well.
    3. If you come to /. for a good spot to stay current in technology, great. But ask yourself, why not the hundreds of other weblogs that do the same thing? Why not the major news outlets? It is probably the /. community itself. The monster of this site's editors sick and twisted minds. *grin* This community was created because we knew we could get the technical information we want and need, but without the dissatisfying taste that we get when we go to other, blander, less human web sites.
    So /. really is about the human experience. It really is about the lives of its creators and editors as much as the news it brings to us. While it is true that if it were all about what the gang did over their weekend, we would leave. If it were all tech, I guarantee we probably wouldn't stay forever. You cannot befriend Tech news. You don't feel like you "kinda know it". That is not true of /.

    I'll conclude with this exercise
    What is the CNN tech new editor's favorite technology?
    What is Hemos' favorite technology?
    The proof is in the pudding.

    Crulx
    crulx@iaxs.net

  205. From what planet am I? by Greg+Merchan · · Score: 5

    Why do so many geeks/nerds/hackers/etc. dislike wearing suits? Or is there just a conspiracy among the media to make that seem so? ;-) (And yes, I've read the jargon files, among others.)

    It seems like suits would be much sought after for a few reasons:
    1) Quality: Your OS is custom tailored, why aren't your clothes?
    2) Slickness: Your GUI is fashionable, why aren't you?
    3) Reuse: Your processes rarely raise a stink after running for days/weeks/months/years on end, but after 24hrs. those jeans and t-shirts are another story.
    4) Modularity: 2+ piece suits can load or unload modules as needed. Processor too hot? rmmod coat. Packets lost in the stream? rmmod necktie. Change in environment? insmod coat. Expecting PHB attack on port *:brainbox insmod necktie.
    5) Efficiency: Since suits/shirts/accessories are interchangeable, there's no need to make your apparel statically linked. (Leave that space on /dev/closet for important things like hardwear^H^H^Hare)
    6) Emulation: Fool your boss, get a raise.

    Well, enough of that list. Now I'll try to predict some replies (R) and answer (A) them:
    1) Quality:
    (R) Sure, you jerk! Not everyone can afford that!
    (A) You're in the computer industry and can't afford two good suits, shirts, and dry-cleaning? Either think of them as supplements instead of complements, or get a job that pays you what it should.
    2) Slickness:
    (R) According to the numbers, MS's GUI is fashionable. I like to express my individuality.
    (A) Fashion isn't about popularity/market-appeal. If you're thinking this way, you're probably missing the point of being an individual.
    3) Reuse:
    (R) I can wear my clothes for days and noone complains.
    (A) They are being polite, but probably stop that when you're not around. Beside badly affecting you in ways you may not know, it's unhealthy.
    4) Modularity:
    (R) Yeah, and I can do the same thing with a regular jacket and so forth.
    (A) Sure, but a suit opens more doors.
    5) Efficiency:
    (R) What could be easier than jeans and a t-shirt? How often do you mix-and-match coats and trousers? That sounds like a static link to me.
    (A) OK, you got me here. But you still can save closet space (and I can pretend I have a /dev/closet :-)
    6) Emulation:
    (R) As if that ever really happens.
    (A) Try it.

    OK, I'm done. Now I'm going to put on my flame-retardant SUIT and wait for replies. In the mean time perhaps someone will come up with open source clothing designs and a sewing machine device driver. Either that or I'll wait for jokes about keyRINGs, softWEAR, jeans, genomes, gnomes; or at least for the server load to drop so I can see the photos.