Slashdot Mirror


ABC Ads Target Answering Machines?

Nerftoe writes "ZDTV an article about automated phone calls to promote its Friday lineup of shows. The odd thing is, ABC doesn't want to talk to humans. They just want to leave their message on your answering machine. What if I real person answers the phone, you ask? That's right, the automated system simply hangs up." I'm not in one of the markets that is doing this, but I have a personal policy of boycotting any business that tele-solicits me. (course the only show on ABC I actually watch is Who's Line is it Anyway, but since Comedy Central airs the much funnier sans-drew English version several times a day anyway, I don't consider that a huge loss either).

247 comments

  1. Re:Take me off your calling list by (void*) · · Score: 2
    Great! So in the small claims court, all I have to do is to hit play on the answering machine that I bring. Instead of my word against theirs, I have got a recording of them calling me twice!

    Yes $500 - easy money!

  2. What's the point? I don't get it. by jht · · Score: 2

    It's not like the answering machine can watch TV - why try and convince it to? That must be ABC's target audience, since humans have a tendency to do one of two things when they get an ad on their answering machine, either:

    A: fast forward through the message. Newer machines just let you skip with a single button push.

    B: Get so angry at this blatant waste of time and invasion of personal space that they actively avoid the ABC network, even if it means skipping Regis.

    This makes no sense at all. Anyone who'd be influenced positively by an answering machine ad is probably too stupid to own and operate a machine in the first place, and accordingly has a job that pays so bad they can't afford any of the crap that gets advertised on ABC to begin with.

    Hell, most systems only work when a human answers, they don't hang up. The only people who should be considering running answering machine ads for ABC are the other networks. If NBC ran ads for ABC that way, they'd be so pissed at ABC they might well skip their Regis fix.

    - -Josh Turiel

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:What's the point? I don't get it. by Sodium+Attack · · Score: 1
      Newer machines just let you skip with a single button push.

      Newer? What time warp did you come through? I have an eleven-year-old answering machine and it lets me skip messages with a single button push.

      --

      Never take moderation advice from sigs, including this one.

  3. ...works great except by latro · · Score: 1


    I've been using this technique for years now - nobody on the line when I pick up, hang up. Why don't more people do this? Or why don't people learn that it's OK to interrupt a telemarketer's spiel with a kind "thank you, not interested" then hang up? Or just hang up when you feel like it? I think we need to offer Senior Citizens "telephone rudeness" classes to counteract the years of polite telephone etiqutte they have been brought up with that makes them so susceptible to these telemarketers!

    The only problem I've had with the no-answer technique is with people calling from overseas (well, people I want to talk to). Sometimes there is a slight delay at the beginning of the connection, but you can usually tell because there is a bit more line noise than from a telemarketer.

    Now that I think about it, even more annoying than those delayed telemarketers are the calls from machines that actaully tell you "please hold for an important message". Jeez, ok, you called me and you expect me to wait on hold as soon as I pick up? Right.

    -------

    --

    -------

    "It was people! People soiled our green!"
  4. Re:tele-solicitors by wishus · · Score: 1
    The answering machine is the big city where I live..

    Haha.. I make myself laugh.. Try this:
    The answering machine is big in the city where I live..

    wishus
    ---

  5. Re:Is this even legal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Right, but it does leave messages.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Re:Is this even legal? by djrogers · · Score: 1

    to any person with whom the caller has an established business relationship at the time the call is made


    Couldn't ABC make the argument that the population of the USA has an established business relationship with them based simply on the fact that everyone has watched ABC at some point? They make money by selling our eyeballs, so if we give them our eyes to sell, that sounds like a business relationship to me!
    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  7. Re:Telemarketers by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    After the first five seconds, I hang up, trusting that if it's someone I want to talk to, they'll call back.

    If you pick up the phone and hear "Please hold" you are advised to hang up as it is either telemarketing or someone to whom you owe money.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by jafuser · · Score: 1
    Coincidence that this topic came up today. I just purchased a service called "Privacy Director" from Bellsouth earlier today because these damn "Out of Area" calls keep calling me at home every freakin' hour from 9am to 6pm. I sleep until 11am every morning, and it seems like I am always getting woke up just to get a dead connection (they hang up on me because they don't have anyone to talk to me). Then they call again an hour later. I can't take this $#!+ anymore... I would just love to go completely postal on these @$$holes... No jury would convict me... mu hu hah hahahAhaHahAHHDH83DH*A

    *ahem*

    Anyway, it's really getting out of hand and we need to do some legislation to make these calls much more scarce.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  9. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by brandon · · Score: 1

    Linux would be a great solution, but the reason I got this caller ID box instead of the rest was that it wsa the cheapest. (It also didn't have those anoying red LED's that blink each time you get a call, man, those things really get anoying. It had the largest LCD display also. It wasn't small, but not to big. I'll post the name of it tomorrow. :-)

    --Brandon

  10. Predictive Dialer by Tayknight · · Score: 2

    Many people in this discussion have been talking about telemarketers hanging up on them Now, IANAL, so I won't get into the legality of hanging up, but I can shed some light the software that many telemarketers use. A predictive dialer works like this:
    List of number is input/imported.
    Dialer dials each number, really really fast.
    If there is an answer, the dialer connects the call to one of the telemarketers. This is why, often there is a one or two second delay from when you say hello, and when the telemarketer starts in.
    If the dialer get a connection and there isn't a telemarketer ready to take the call, i.e. they are all on the phone, the dialer hangs up and will try the call again later.
    Annoying, but the good predictive dialers can call tens of thousands of numbers an hour. Somehow the dialers is hooked straight into the PBX and can dial the numbers at amazing rates. My $.02 worth.

    --
    Pair up in threes. - Yogi Berra
  11. Sometimes Caller ID Lies by Monte · · Score: 1

    Before you call the number on yer Caller ID display and start venting, consider this:

    Where I work there are maybe, I dunno, a thousand people in the building. When someone, anyone, picked up the phone on their desk and dialed an outside number, the number that showed up on the target's caller ID was the number to the receptionist. Who had to handle a good number of irate calls - "WHY DID YOU CALL ME?!?" - from people who simply wouldn't listen to the facts that it could have been anyone in the building.

    As it turns out, we just told the phone co to block ID to save the trouble. Too bad - because I'd love to block anonymous calls with my nifty little Radio Shack Caller ID F-You Box, but I can't afford to miss a call from The Boss.

    The lesson: The number you call back may not be the number that placed the call.

    There's always time for politeness!
    - Politenessman

    1. Re:Sometimes Caller ID Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Absolutely!

      For a price, Caller ID can say any of a number of things. "UNLISTED", "UNAVAILABLE" and "OUT OF AREA" are common. Last week I started getting a new one, "PRIVATE NAME".

      Banks, utilities, collection agencies, telemarketers and politicians don't want you to know who is calling. The local electric co. does this to call people who are behind in their payments. It's actually 4 bogus names that rotate in sequence.

      Both the Bush and Gore campaign fundraisers use bogus caller id strings. They give a fake name and number. I know, I got calls from both candidates (told them both to fsck off) and then I tried to call them back. Result: "Your call cannot be completed as dialed..."

      The telco will intercept all "BLOCKED" calls for a fee (so your phone never rings), but no one uses "BLOCKED" anymore, they just pay for a bogus name and number. A couple of months ago my answering machine with caller id got one from "SWEEPSTAKES HQ" from a "900" number. I wonder how many people fell for that one.

      It's an arms race between us and the telemarketers, and the phone companies are selling arms to both sides!

  12. No Solicitation by aonifer · · Score: 1

    US West has a solution for these and pretty much any solicitation calls. They call it "No Solicitation." Basically, you sign up for the service and when someone calls you, they get a soothing female voice telling you that your number does not accept solicitations and to put it on their do-not-call lists. Then they get a choice of pushing 1 or staying on the line and my phone rings. You can add numbers to a list that don't get the message, so your friends and family don't have to type 1 every time they call you. Since getting this service about a month ago, I've gotten zero phone solicitations. The only down side is that I have to pay money to be left alone, which I find kind of repugnant.

    No, I don't work for US West. I actually don't particularly like them.

  13. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Windigo+The+Feral+(N · · Score: 2

    Tytso dun said:

    In some states, it's illegal for telemarketers to simply drop the line after someone picks up. After all, it can be quite threatening for someone's phone to ring and then to suddenly drop the connection. For all you know, it might be someone checking to see if you're in before deciding to break into your house.....

    ObDisclaimer: IANAL. I do not even pretend to be a lawyer on the Internet. Your mileage may vary considerably.

    At least here in Kentucky, this type of sillybuggers would be illegal on at least two counts:

    possible telephone harassment (as in calling, and as soon as a live human picks up, disconnecting--this is different from "predictive dialing" which is the cause of most hangups with telemarketers (basically, nobody available to take the call when your phone number gets rang)

    A nifty provision in Kentucky's telemarketing law that prohibits nearly all recorded telemarketing announcements (you have to put a live human on the phone within ten seconds if the company doesn't have a prior business relationship with you, and in all cases you have to provide a number that may be called to be added to a do-not-call list).

    Conceivably, you could prolly even get them on federal telemarketing laws for providing no easy way to be added to a do-not-call list and in fact doing everything they can to avoid do-not-call requests (many courts would be likely to see the fact they hang up the snecking phone when a live human picks it up as a deliberate attempt to avoid following federal telemarketing regs, and may even see it as prima facie evidence of "willful" disregard--read: $1500 per offence if you sue in small claims court).

    --
    -Windigo The Feral (NYAR!)
  14. Re:All the more reason for a message like this... by jafuser · · Score: 1
    That's because there's a 2-3 second delay between the time you say "hello" and the operator actually comes on the line. If you don't have caller-id you can usually figure out a telemarketer by saying "hello", waiting about 1 second, say hello again, and if there's not an instant reponse, hang up.

    I did this before I got CallerID and it seemd to work. Everyone I know will usually acknowledge your "hello" within a second or two if they are a friend or relative. If not, then they will call back again and you can assume that it's someone you know. A telemarketer will usually not re-call again right away, and if they do then you definitely need to flame them...

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  15. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    >Call rejection is a scam. You pay to have anonymous calls blocked. OK, fine so far.
    >
    > The problem is that the phone company turns around and offers a service to businesses: blocked anonymous call rejection override. That way, the businesses that pay the fee can still get through.
    >
    > They need to start selling is a blocked anonymous call rejection override override.

    Why? So we can pay the phone company more to prevent marketers - whose harassment the phone companies already endorse by selling them ACR overriding services - from harassing us?

    Why? So that after we've paid (twice!) for protection from harassment, the phone company can then sell ACR-override-override-override ability to the goddamn telemarketers, putting us right back where we started?

    Fuck that. What we need is legislation such as the ballot initiative currently going around in California that would ban telemarketing altogether, thereby stopping the problem at its source.

    Call rejection isn't the scam. The real scam is the fact thet the phone company makes a small fortune selling weapons to the combatants on both sides of the ongoing privacy arms race.

  16. Re:Telemarketers by dorward · · Score: 1

    Another favourite trick is:
    "I'm not trying to sell you anything but would you mind answering a few questions?"
    "Umm. OK." (Big Mistake)
    "If we were to offer you a whatever it is with a 30% discount, would you be interested?"

  17. $1500 per offense - Payable by el Presidente? by sulli · · Score: 1
    That would be excellent.

    Of course the biggest offenders here in SF, CA are the political campaigns, both Democrat and Republican. I remember getting LOTS of Bill Clinton, Dianne Feinstein, Willie Brown, et al. recorded messages last fall when the SF mayor's race was on. I'm sure the Repubs do the same thing in Orange County (say). If CA had this law, or similar federal law were in effect, the campaigns would face some very severe liability!

    sulli

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:$1500 per offense - Payable by el Presidente? by qazxsw · · Score: 1

      The federal law related to this is only regulating *commercial* automated phone calls. Political and other non-commercial calls are exempt.

  18. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Phil+Gregory · · Score: 1

    "Half the scientists in the universe were working on jamming the Electronic Thumb's signals, and the other half were working on jamming the jamming signals..."


    --Phil (I, personally, have never before heard of "blocked anonymous call rejection override".)

    --
    355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!
  19. Hoax? by Transition+Cat · · Score: 1
    Seriously, is this true? I skimmed the article at ZDTV and didn't see a link to any sort of confirmation. Now this story can be cited to both ZDTV and Slashdot and next who knows, but it's not any more true than if only ZDTV reported it. This sounds more like rumor than fact to me, mostly because I have difficulty believing that anything this supremely stupid would ever get off the ground, even in Dilbertesqe Corporate America. Does anyone have actual confirmation?

    ....

    --

    ....
    --Hey Doctor Jones! No time for love!

  20. Illegal by 11223 · · Score: 2
    I don't know about the big Mich., but in Illinois it's illegal to target an ad to an answering machine. I still get them all the time, but it's illegal and should be reported to your Secretary of State's office if you have such a law.

    It's also amazing how often I'll get hangup phone calls from telemarketers. Grr...

  21. They'd better be the only ones by fonebone · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine what would happen if lots of companies started using this terrible waste of technology? Right now, I get at least twice as much spam as I do real email. What would happen if all of a sudden people were getting twice as many spam phone calls (hang-ups / answering machine messages) as they were real phone calls?

    I don't really see why ABC would be choosing such a low brow way of advertising, anyway. It feels as wrong as Apple advertising a new product through "forward this to everyone on your list" icq messages.

    --

    --
    when the rain comes, they run and hide their heads. they might as well be dead.
    1. Re:They'd better be the only ones by Refrag · · Score: 1

      I already get more spam on my answering machine than I do via e-mail. I'm thinking of disconnecting my answering machine.

      Refrag

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  22. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Delta-9 · · Score: 2

    In he State of Texas, it is illegal to make a phone call without the intention of talking. Just my 2cents.. AC

    Damn. Lots of modem users are about to be arrest in Texas.

    -d9

  23. Isn't this illegal? by Steve+B · · Score: 2
    I thought it was illegal to do fully-automated (i.e. no option to speak to an acutal human) telemarketing calls. The Junkbusters summary of telemarketing law seems to bear this out:
    The TCPA also prohibits artificial or prerecorded voice message calls to residences made without prior express consent, unless it is an emergency call or specifically exempted by the Commission.
    Presumably, these people found a loophole (or, I hope, incorrectly think that they've found a loophole, and are about to receive a clue-by-four message to the contrary).
    /.
    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  24. tactics by latro · · Score: 1


    Ok, if you really want to stick it to the poor schlub doing that job, then go ahead and waste his time - 'cause you are making him lose money. That's fair enough, since they did actually call you, but realize who, exactly, you are getting your revenge on! I feel sorry for those dudes, so I just hang up (sometimes I even politely say "no thank you" in the middle of their jabbering, but sometimes not)

    One guy I know just says hello then sets the phone down in front of the TV just to see how long they keep talking to nobody in particular.

    A former boss of mine who is Korean thought he would outsmart them by only speaking Korean - of course they immediately switched him to a Korean-speaking telemarketer! (I think it was one of those long-distance companies, so maybe that's not so much of a surprise).

    -------

    --

    -------

    "It was people! People soiled our green!"
  25. How do you get your number off the list? by cheeserd00d · · Score: 1

    If you can't talk to a real person then how do you get your name removed so you don't get any more solicitations? Doesn't this go against the FCC's 1995 Telemarketing Sales Rules?

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, three lefts do!
  26. waiting by latro · · Score: 1


    And why is it again that you actually wait for them to switch you to a live person? Just hang up!

    -------

    --

    -------

    "It was people! People soiled our green!"
  27. Re:Anonymous Call Rejection by fishie · · Score: 1

    I think this is an excellent suggestion. Now how do we get the government to support this idea?

    Something else I've noticed is that you can with about 99% accuracy detect a telemarketing call by the delay of their inital response. When you answer the phone and say "Hello" it usually takes a second for them to respond. Next time you get a telemarketing call, take note of this... if the person on the other end doesn't initially respond as quick as a normal caller would, odds are good it's a telemarketer. And I have a one sound answer to those calls.... "click."

    --


    "Say no more..." - Monty Python
  28. Forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Years ago, I witnessed my best friend tell an MCI drone that he didn't need to change his long distance service because he didn't have a phone. You could almost hear the wheels turning inside the telemarketer's head during the pause that insued. It was great!

  29. So that's what all those hang ups have been for... by joshamania · · Score: 2

    I've been getting this stuff for a couple of weeks now. I've never gotten a message on my voice mail, but it does seem to be some automated thing calling me and hanging up.

    I can't stand this kind of crap. I live and work not too far from L.A., something like this on my answering machine would have me finding ABC here in town and giving them what for. It's bad enough when automated telemarketing systems call me and expect me to listen to a recording.

  30. DANGER: ignorant moderators on the loose by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 1

    What idiot moderated the parent to this thread down as "off-topic"? If the fool had read the story, they would have seen that the last sentence read "(course the only show on ABC I actually watch is Who's Line is it Anyway, but since Comedy Central airs the much funnier sans-drew English version several times a day anyway, I don't consider that a huge loss either). "

    The parent thread discusses the English version. The parent thread discusses the ABC version. The main thrust of the story is about telemarketers, but the story also opens up other discussions too.

    So moderate me down too. Ignorant pigs!

  31. Re:sig's answering machine by Robert+S+Gormley · · Score: 1

    You can get nice new digital answering machines with good clarity :)

    --

    Open Source. Closed Minds. We are Slashdot.

  32. Re:sig's answering machine by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

    Yet another possible abuse of DMCA.... I LIKE IT!!! Seriously, though, I am sure you can find a whole slew of laws to apply against this, and with caller id or call trace enabled, I'm sure you could make money off of lawsuits for a while until people wisened up.

    --
    We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
  33. Too Late by ParticleGirl · · Score: 3

    This is no longer the case. According to my New York Times on the 22nd, "ABC has backed away from a controversial plan to use sitcom stars like Norm MacDonald to promote its fall lineup by leaving taped messages on the home answering machines of viewers." I'm sure there's a copy available on the online NY Times archive, for a fee. :P ABC was facing a tremendous backlash, and changed their minds about this being a good idea. There may still be references available at the New York Times. The funniest promotional idea for ABC, however, can be found in the bathroom.

    --
    Do something about world hunger. Click here
    1. Re:Too Late by Kook9 · · Score: 1

      The NYTimes article should be availabe at this link. But it's the result of a search, so there might be weird session issues. (Free registration required, as always.)

      They reported this on Saturday as an idea that would not go forward. But the company they hired to do it specializes in this kind of marketing.

      Kook9 out.

  34. just to continue... by latro · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam. I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the power.

    -------

    --

    -------

    "It was people! People soiled our green!"
  35. I like Drew.. but jeeze... the old show was by GreyFauk · · Score: 1

    MUCH funnier... *shrug*
    Just goes to show how people's tastes differ.

    --
    Friends don't let friends buy Compaq's. (Dell/Gateway... same same) You want a good computer? Build it yourself.
  36. Any lawyers? by Count+Spatula · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure something like this could be argued as illegal in the DMCA, but IANAL, so I haven't a clue as to where to start.

    I also seem to remember some federal statute regarding fax machines and the such and transmission of unsolicited advertisement on them. Maybe this can be used to combat ABC. Any takers?

    --
    -- Count Spatula: The Culinary Vampire "...because my cooking sucks."
  37. I think I know who did it. by ptbrown · · Score: 2

    Was it a short, kinda roundish guy, covered in white fur and had large, floppy ears? He also has an affinity for using a switchblade.

    Yeah, I think this is the guy.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
  38. Was illegal in California ten years ago by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3

    I got a telemarketer in trouble for violating two rules:

    Must be a human who makes the call, and only switches to a recording when the recipient agrees to listen to it. This guy had a war dialer.

    Must disconnect when the recipient disconnects. This is to allow someone to hang up and call 911 if necessary. This idiot's machine kept the line tied up for several minutes.

    To make it short, I left my name and asked for a callback, then had a zillion reasons for being busy, until he finally gave me his number. Then a quick call to Pac Bell, who refused to do anything, and a call to the state PUC, who straightened them out.

    --

    1. Re:Was illegal in California ten years ago by alexgould · · Score: 1

      Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay, eternal happiness is just a dollar away.

      [4F01] Lisa's Date with Destiny

  39. Chain Gang Callers by MacJedi · · Score: 1
    The next time you get a phone solicitation ask the caller if he is in jail...

    /joeyo

    --
    2^5
  40. Getting Back at Telemarketers by slasher666 · · Score: 3

    I have only a mobile phone anymore, so I no
    longer get to do this, but, back in the day,
    when I'd get a telemarketer calling, I'd

    SIMPLY INITIATE PHONE SEX!!!

    Ask the telemarketer what they're wearing.
    Ask them to take it off very slowly...
    etc...

    Funny as hell!

  41. Re:Is this even legal? by Tackhead · · Score: 3
    >And what about bans on computer calling? Or do they have a real human talk to the answering machine

    That's why they're hanging up when a human answers the phone!

    It's illegal to have a machine dial up and play a recorded spiel. It's easy to prove it if you live in a state that allows a single party to tape a phone call with or without the consent of the other party. A taped call with a spiel that drones on and on despite repeated queries of "Hello? Are you a human or a recording?" is pretty damning evidence that it's a robo-dialer.

    But it's much harder to prove that the message on your answering machine was generated by a machine. Telemarketers can, have, and will continue to, perjure themselves on the stand by saying "Yes, that message was left by a live human", thereby turning the burden of proof on the person charging them under the TCPA.

    Yet more reason why the entire industry should be outlawed.

  42. Re:Take me off your calling list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Of course, you could just add "If this is a phone solictation, please remove me from your calling list" to your answering machine message.

  43. I got an idea... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    All these marketers want to get peoples attention. Why don't they pay homeless people to urinate from the top of tall buildings onto the crowds below then hold up billboards. That'll get people to really look and get your name out there. It won't make people much madder either.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  44. Isn't this illegal in some states? by tytso · · Score: 5

    In some states, it's illegal for telemarketers to simply drop the line after someone picks up. After all, it can be quite threatening for someone's phone to ring and then to suddenly drop the connection. For all you know, it might be someone checking to see if you're in before deciding to break into your house.....

    1. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by GossG · · Score: 1
      ...and turn off...

      How do you turn off caller id suppression (turn on caller id) when you're calling from a cel phone. If I were calling your line, how do I tell my provider (Telus would probably use similar process to other providers) that I want my call to be identifiable?

    2. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3
      I guess they'd better bring me in on charges.. I've been hanging up on solicitors for the past 3 years without saying a word...
      You call up solicitors? Wow. I get enough of them bothering me without initiating contact on my own.
    3. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Peyna · · Score: 1
      I live in Indiana and have the same problem, I actually gave up believing it was a prank caller or telemarketer, and now I just put it off as being some problem with the telco's around this crazy place. Happens at least 2-3 times a day, phone rings, you answer, noone's there, a click, whatever.......

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by nospoon · · Score: 1

      My favorite quote from the article.
      "Gee, my wife's new boyfriend is much more discreet than the last one."

      HAHAHAHAHA

    5. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Ventilator · · Score: 1

      Over here in switzerland, you can have your entry in the phonebook marked as "does not wish advertising". The entry is then marked with a little star.

      Of course, I have mine entry marked and spam-calls have decreased at almost 99 %. (Though it wasn't that much calls anyway, but it's annoying nontheless.)
      When someone calls me to advertise whatever it is, I just tell him that I do not wish any advertising by phone and refer to the marked entry. If the caller would insist on advertising, this then would be illegal.

      --
      --- If OS were buildings, then the first woodpecker to come around would erase 95 % of civilization.
    6. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Ventilator · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention:

      It also counts for fax-machines, so I suppose it's relevant for answering-machines too.

      --
      --- If OS were buildings, then the first woodpecker to come around would erase 95 % of civilization.
    7. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Van+Halen · · Score: 2
      They need to start selling is a blocked anonymous call rejection override override.

      I've got this already, essentially. I have a voice modem in my linux box, so I hacked up a perl script to make it my answering machine. Whenever callerid data comes up as Unknown or Private, the computer answers immediately (usually just after the first ring, sometimes before the phone itself actually rings). Works like a charm. Telemarketers never bug me now, and on the rare occasion that someone I know has callerid blocking, they can either leave a message or call back using *82.

    8. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Van+Halen · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by gi_wrighty · · Score: 1
      Quick someone help me! I've got five mod points and I want to mod this all the way up but I can't decide what it is, funny or informative or insightful? Arggh the decisions.....

      Oh bugger, now I've posted. No chance of modding now. Sorry Siggy, no karma from me.

      wrighty.

    10. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Mark+F.+Komarinski · · Score: 4

      I got the same thing in MA. However, the phone company gave me the address for the direct marketing association and send them a letter to quit calling me. Hasn't really worked much.

      Some areas where Bell Atlantic are offer anonymous call rejection, where callers that don't identify themselves via caller ID get a message saying that the recipient of the call is rejecting them. Of course, it's not available (yet) in my area...

      --
      -- Ever notice that fast-burning fuse looks exactly the same as slow-burning fuse? I didn't... (Edgar Montrose)
    11. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Zoyd · · Score: 1

      My roommate and I were getting annoyed by apparant prank callers

      There is no such thing as a "prank caller." The term is "crank caller."

    12. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by peccary · · Score: 1

      Health care providers have a legitimate use for BACRO. Your wife might not be too happy to find that the local walk-in health clinic has been repeatedly calling, but not leaving a message on the machine (because they are bound to inform you, and only you, that the chippie down the street mentioned your name when she was getting her antibiotics). So they have to make their calls anonymously -- and they do have to get through the block.

    13. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by bonehead · · Score: 1

      You call up solicitors?

      If they're dumb enough to let their number show on my caller ID, you bet your ass I do.

      If I have time on my hands, I'll call them and try to sell them my dead battery collection several times in an evening. If I'm short on time, I'll just send a fax to that number, which will, of course, auto-redial every 4 minutes and greet them with a pleasant little screech tone.

    14. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by mangino · · Score: 2

      This is completely legal. Collection agencies use autodialers, where a machine dials lots of numbers and when a person (or answering machine) picks up the phone, it transfers the line to them. I worked as a bill collector on an autodialer. it is a great way to make a whole lot of calls quickly.

      Mike
      --
      Mike Mangino
      Sr. Software Engineer, SubmitOrder.com

      --
      Mike Mangino
      mmangino@acm.org
    15. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by jonathanclark · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been having much fun. I suggest you quickly get to your phone and dail one or all of these numbers.

      Spammer 800/888 phone numbers

      --

    16. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by mitheral · · Score: 1

      On telus Mobility one uses #67; on normal land line the magic is invoked with *67. Note This is a toggle feature; it changes state everytime you use it.

    17. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Fearomone · · Score: 1

      It depends on the exact wording of the law. You are, after all, making a phone call with the intention of communicating. Does anyone have the relevant information to hand, and care?

    18. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by egburr · · Score: 1

      Any chance you might post the script?

      Edward Burr

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    19. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by brandon · · Score: 2

      At my house we have several caller ID's. I don't remember the make (if you want it, post and I'll get back tomorrow) that does the call rejection with hardware at my house. The caller ID box it's self picks up the phone and simply says "This person does not accept anounymous calls, please hangup and turn off....." You can also pick up the phone if you do want it. I just wait for 2 rings. If I hear 1 ring, it was anonymous and rejected. This takes care of a LOT of solicitation.

      My point is, don't pay the phone company to reject calls, pay an extra $1 or 2 and get it done on the caller ID box it's self. Then you don't have to worry about caller ID blocking override.

      --Brandon

    20. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Cramer · · Score: 2

      "... and thus, the Infinite Improbablity Drive appeared out of thin air." (That's one of my all time favorite bits of logic.)

    21. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      ... because the telco's network is loaded enough as it is.

    22. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by mayonaise · · Score: 1

      By whose definition? From dictionary.com:

      prank1 (prngk)
      n.

      A mischievous trick or practical joke.

      Calling somebody and tricking them (into thinking it's a real call) by hanging up would be a prank call. I've heard both "prank" and "crank" used, however.

    23. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Municipa · · Score: 1

      I don't think this applies when someone calls you and you hang up on them.

    24. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Mark+F.+Komarinski · · Score: 1

      Hrm...is this like the trace buster buster buster?

      --
      -- Ever notice that fast-burning fuse looks exactly the same as slow-burning fuse? I didn't... (Edgar Montrose)
    25. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by WNight · · Score: 4

      There was a funny story of vigilantism in a community newspaper a while back (East Vancouver paper, dunno which one, 'bout a year ago.) where the manager at a telemarketing firm was kidnapped after work, driven out of town, dumped out and beaten senseless.

      Supposedly he was told while it was happening (he was blindfolded and tied) that it was because the office he managed kept call the person (the assailant) back and being rude when asked to not call in the future.

      They told him that if the office didn't shut down, they'd break his back the next time.

      Was a bit hunt for the guy, didn't hear that he'd ever been caught, or anything about the telemarketer.

      Can't say I feel a lot of sympathy... When I was just out a school I worked, for two days, as a telemarketer. The boss was dishonest, they sold magazines and no matter which ones you picked, they sent you (and billed for) the same ones. They instructed people to harrass people on cell phones to make them buy, because many people would pay just to get you off the phone, no being strong-willed enough to hang up.

      I quit that and never looked back... anyone making money in that business is a crook, plain and simple.

    26. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by WNight · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they'll protect you, for a fee, from other attorneys.

      Nice service, but when the Italian guys offer it, we call it a protection racket.

    27. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by meldroc · · Score: 1

      "Respectable" telemarketing firms pay thousands of dollars for their phone lists to businesses (such as your bank.) They also purchase demographic data to help them target their victims. (phone scam businesses typically target little old ladies - they're easy to badger into giving away their life savings.)

      --

      Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
    28. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by volume · · Score: 1
      And at what point do we get to tell marketers to keep their hands of off things I bought for specific, personal use.

      I bought my phone to talk to friends and family. Not so marketers can call me. I have an e-mail account for the same purpose and not to receive spam. My answering machine is personal and private. Please keep off!

      In my book, marketers are right up there with attorneys. Can't trust 'em and they'll do anything for a buck.

      --------------------
      Tomorrow is another day. Tuesday, to be specific.
      --------------------

    29. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by PD · · Score: 2

      Call rejection is a scam. You pay to have anonymous calls blocked. OK, fine so far.

      The problem is that the phone company turns around and offers a service to businesses: blocked anonymous call rejection override. That way, the businesses that pay the fee can still get through.

      They need to start selling is a blocked anonymous call rejection override override.

    30. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Delta-9 · · Score: 2

      Would going down the phone book alphabetically and dialling every third hispanic sounding name be illegal?

      Not necessarily illegal, but the phone company would be after you.

      The phone company uses its resources to circulate information for us (its customers) in the form of a phone book. This is to be used for looking up phone numbers of people you know.

      If you were to use the phone book for telemarketing or snail mail advertising, you would eventually get a "dummy" mailbox. This phone number and address do not exist, because there is no real person associated to it.

      The phone company uses this to catch people would are using the phone book for advertising.

      You then get a lawsuit filed against you for theft of services or something like that. The person I know settled out of court.

      I heard about this 2nd hand from a teacher at the U. of Pittsburgh.

      -d9

    31. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by David+Greene · · Score: 1
      Or as a friend of mine speculates, what if it's the phone company calling and hanging up in order to promote Caller ID?

      Nice, eh?

      --

      --

    32. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Malk-a-mite · · Score: 2
      I believe it's also illegal to setup a machine for dialing blocks of numbers to call. Hence the reason they are aiming for the answering machines.

      Somebody in the Marketing dept. who took a Law 101 class trying to find a loophole?

      Malk-a-mite

    33. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by troeg · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone is trying to connect to your computer?

    34. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Peyna · · Score: 1
      Then it would try to negotiate when I picked up the line. I work at an ISP, we get people calling the voice number with modems all the time. It's fun to try to negotiate a 2400 baud connection using your voice.

      --
      What?
    35. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Signal+11 · · Score: 1
      After all, it can be quite threatening for someone's phone to ring and then to suddenly drop the connection.

      I guess they'd better bring me in on charges.. I've been hanging up on solicitors for the past 3 years without saying a word...

    36. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Hmm... I would bet that the same thing could be done with mgetty fairly easily. That way I wouldn't have to pay for a special Caller-ID box, I would have yet another excuse to tinker with my Linux box, and I could say that my solution "ran on Linux."

      Now just imagine a beowulf cluster of those babies!

    37. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      The difference being there are some attorneys that actually perform a useful service...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    38. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Tower · · Score: 1

      If you are 18-34, you shouldn't need Viagra... of course, just seeing Bob Dole on those commercials is enough to shut things down for an extended period of time...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    39. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by Tower · · Score: 1

      Either one is acceptable these days...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    40. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by petros · · Score: 1
      How do you turn off caller id suppression (turn on caller id) when you're calling from a cel phone.

      *67 blocks your caller id, *82 enables it. These are both prefixes to the number you are calling, and are only good for the current call. These code are standard and should work on any landline and cellular phone in the US and Canada.

    41. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by mayonaise · · Score: 2

      My roommate and I were getting annoyed by apparant prank callers (the caller would hangup when we picked up, and would never leave a message). We called the phone company, who forwarded us to some place that deals with (i think) telemarketing calls, and they said that it was perfectly O.K. (I'm in Indiana, by the way). The excuse they gave was that sometimes the telemarketers' machines dial numbers, and when someone picks up, if no human on the telemarketer's side is available to talk, that it simply hangs up. I call it harrasing phone calls; they call it normal business.

    42. Re:Isn't this illegal in some states? by chowpalace · · Score: 1

      Suppose it isnt 'blocks of numbers' but blocks of demographics ie: 18 - 34 beer drinking males that prematurely use viagra. Would going down the phone book alphabetically and dialling every third hispanic sounding name be illegal?

  45. Re:ABC has dumber ideas than this. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > [... description of ABC's urinal ad campaign snipped... ]

    I think you mean:

    ABC: Finding yet another use for the color yellow.

  46. Re:So that's what all those hang ups have been for by jafuser · · Score: 1
    I've had the same situation. It has just started about a month ago. I get about 6-7 calls from "Out of Area" every single weekday. When I have managed to answer them, I randomly either get a telemarketer or a dead signal.

    What's going on? Why is this suddenly *really* bad (as of about a month ago)? I never had such a flood of telemarketing calls before...

    Did some sleazy bastard sell his tech stocks and start up a company, and hire a few thousand cheap low-lifes that will annoy anyone for any tiny cost?

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  47. The cast by Malc · · Score: 1

    ABC might have managed to get some of the usual suspects from the original "Whose Line is it Anyway", but Drew Carey is dreadful. Clive Anderson is the probably the reason I like the original so much. I've even seen a few episodes that we were filmed in New York. They were funny, so that rules out the location.

  48. Hmm.... by GoRK · · Score: 2

    And where do you think they got the list of all their viewer's phone numbers?

    You guessed it. Calling the "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" 1-800 number! Did you know that you can't block your phone number being relayed to a Toll-Free, 900, or 977 number?

    I bet they sell this list to their advertisers too.

    ~GoRK

    1. Re:Hmm.... by Thorsett · · Score: 1

      > I bet they sell this list to their advertisers too.

      Not without violating federal law. FCC regulations prohibit a company from reusing or selling phone numbers captured by Automatic Number Identification devices on 800 or 900 lines. Companies may only reuse such information to market products/services that are directly related to a product/service that you have previously purchased from them.

  49. Just a marketing tool,,, by chowpalace · · Score: 1

    I am of the thought that if someone is indeed home, the machine logs the length of time necessary to answer the call, then collates the information for the target market. Otherwise, its a unsolicited "push-type" advert. Id wager that people would listen to the ad over sheer confusion as this wouldnt be the normal type of message one would be used to receiving.

  50. Re:Any /. readers work for ABC? by dboyles · · Score: 1

    Ok, so we know that ABC has backed off of its plan, but I got to thinking... how would something like this not be considered a Denial of Service? It is essentially preventing you from receiving authorized traffic on that line, not to mention filling up your answering machine with garbage. Is this really that much different from a bunch of people ping -f'ing abc.com? Setting up dialers to call an ABC 800 number?

    --
    -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  51. Great...more marketing by Leghorn · · Score: 1

    That's why answering machines have a "delete" key...

    --
    ----- Leghorn "Not responsible for program content"
  52. Nope. It aint. by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 2

    Check the law.

    It plainly states:
    (b) Restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment
    (1) Prohibitions
    It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States -
    (B) to initiate any telephone call to any residential
    telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to
    deliver a message without the prior express consent of the
    called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency
    purposes or is exempted by rule or order by the Commission
    under paragraph (2)(B);

  53. sig's answering machine by Signal+11 · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is Signal 11's answering machine. If you are a friend please leave a message after the tone. If you are a bill collector or an advertiser, please leave your message *BEFORE* the tone. If you fail to comply, you will be charged $45 for unauthorized access into this computational device as provided under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act which categorizes this device as a protected database of confidential information. Thank you.

    1. Re:sig's answering machine by CodeSlave · · Score: 1

      Can I really use this as an answering machine message and can I enforce it?

      --
      This isn't sig. it's banner for advertising.
    2. Re:sig's answering machine by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Yes and no, respectively. Does your answering machine record the calling number? (this assumes the number is actually announced.)

    3. Re:sig's answering machine by B.D.Mills · · Score: 2

      "... Advertisers who leave a message on this machine will be charged an access fee of $45. Leaving such a message indicates acceptance of these terms." This is best done with a single-tape answering machine with date, time, caller ID. Each time you get a message, take out the tape, seal it in a bag and write the name of the advertiser, and the date and time on the bag. It is now evidence. Keep it. If the ABC or any other advertiser gets into trouble with the FTC for this, you can turn it over to them. You can also use it yourself if you sue them for breach of contract. --- Or, you might like to try the following message: "Hello? ... (pause) ... No, there's nobody able to take your call at present, so please leave a message after the beep." This attempts to circumvent the answering-machine-detection technology. If the technology assumes that a pause on the other end means there's a human on the line, this will confound the technology. --- Another thing that may confound the technology is if it uses the quality of the signal as an indication of whether it is talking to a human or a machine. The signal quality of answering machine tapes is generally a lot worse than a live human on the line, so if you can somehow get a REALLY high-quality answering-machine message, you may flummox the technology enough to make it hang up. --- Wouldn't it be nice if you could firewall your phone? No caller ID? Reject the call. You may be able to do this at the exchange, but it could also make an interesting project for someone with knowledge of the phone system and time on their hands.
      --

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  54. Don't cane the plan, cane the executives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Jumping the scum who came up with this idea and leaving them with a bunch of bloody welts... that would probably do more to stop this insanity with our telephones than ten thousand posts to Slashdot.

    The company is called Voice Mail Broadcasting. They are headquartered in Pasadena. Big California cities are really tight with concealed-weapons permits; the scum who runs the outfit almost certainly doesn't have one. Buy the rattan for cash, style your hair funny and wear old clothes. Leave no fingerprints. Post a pointer to the news item, but don't say you had anything to do with it... to anyone. And make all of our days.

  55. All the more reason for a message like this... by Greyfox · · Score: 3
    (loud music)

    HELLO?

    (Pause)

    HANG ON A SECOND...

    (Sound of stomping across the floor. Music stops. Sound of stomping across the floor.)

    Hello?

    (Pause)

    Oh... Well he's not here, and I'm just a machine, so you probably should leave a message. (BEEP)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:All the more reason for a message like this... by narf · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I do when the callerid says "OUTSIDE AREA". However, the casket sales-people call right back.

    2. Re:All the more reason for a message like this... by AstroJetson · · Score: 2

      My message says, "I'm not home. Think fast....beeep". At least once a day I get a message from a telemarketer along these lines: "Hello......hello.......may I speak to Greg Mizell?.....hello......click" Apparently they just can't think quite that fast.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
  56. Re:Telemarketers by cyberdonny · · Score: 2

    Telemarketer: Hello, is Mr. Tosh there?
    Me: Yes he's here, what is this in relation to?
    Telemarketer: We'd like to sell him a...
    Me: Ok, I fetch him, just a minute please
    Me [leaves receiver off hook, and goes back doing whatever I was doing before]
    Me [20 minutes later, after a quick glance at my ISDN logs]: Gee, they are getting stupider day by day: this one stayed 13 minutes!

  57. I like telemarketers by chowda · · Score: 1

    I sometimes just talk to telemarketers until they beg me to get off the phone.. cause I never buy anything.. I just ask stupid questions and make them waste time... one time a supervisor came on the line and said "Hang up now Tralula" because I had her on there for like 45 minutes..

    "I have nothing better to do than talk to telemarketers and complain about slashdot polls"

    --

    YouTube & Google Video -> podcast http://castcluster.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:I like telemarketers by CMiYC · · Score: 2

      In college I had a roommate that always said he was going to start talking sexy to them if they were a woman. Now, he was a nice guy and couldn't bring himself to do it... Well he and I stayed up for like 2 days studing for something. (He was the brightest, but he tried hard). So it was like 10am and we had both been asleep for *maybe* 5 hours (after nearly 48 of being awake).


      Phone rings, and I answer:
      me: "what?"
      [5 second pause...i knew it was coming]
      her: "good morning, I'm calling for...blah blah blah blah" [i let her talk for about 30 seconds... I was about to hang up and then I got an idea..]
      me: "wait a second...let me ask you a question about the interest rate, I'm confused. Is that okay?"
      her: "Sure!"
      me: [deep i-want-you voice]"what are you wearing?"
      her: "what?"
      me: "what are you wearning? is it pink. i like pink."
      her: "am I wearing anything PINK? THAT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS."
      me: "huh. geez. you could at least talk dirty to me... just like mom use to."

      at that point she got all upset and hung up.

      nonetheless, we got a kick out of it... reminded me of the Seinfield episode.

      ---

  58. Telephone Consumer Protection Act? by akiy · · Score: 1

    I thought the Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibited pre-recorded advertising messages unless the sender obtained the express permission or consent of the party...

    --

    --
    http://www.aikiweb.com - AikiWeb Aikido Information

  59. Any /. readers work for ABC? by joshamania · · Score: 3

    I'm sure we'd all love the home phone number of the jag-off at ABC who dreamt this wonderful scheme up. Really, any high level executive's phone number will do. When's the last time someone like this got their telephone slashdotted?

    1. Re:Any /. readers work for ABC? by tswinzig · · Score: 1

      I guess not.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  60. The best response to telemarketers by evanbd · · Score: 2
    OK, I know its a little off topic, but I felt like sharing. Here's the best response to telemarketers I've yet heard. Converstion goes like this:

    [Phone Rings] Me: Hello? Hello?

    [Telemarketer answers] TM: Blah blah buy product blah blah.

    Me: Yes, I'm very interested, but I'm quite busy. Hang on one sec, I'll be RIGHT back.

    I sit back down to dinner, phone off hook.

    Several minutes later, that noise that tells me to hang up the phone starts, so I get up and hang up the phone.

    The best part is, the most valuable thing they have is an interested customer, second is time. I make them waste time by pretending to be interested, until they decide I must not be... and eventually they hang up. Try it some time.

  61. an Eye for an Eye by JasonVergo · · Score: 2

    Lets slashdot those idiots. Option 1: Go find your local station at: http://abc.go.com/local_stations/ls_home.html Call them. If someone picks them hang-up. Repeat this until you get an answer machine and let that machine know how you really feel about this. Option 2: We all request a webpage from www.abc.com if a webserver answers, hang-up. Repeat 50 Gillizion times. DDOS as a form of justified civil disobedience. Heck, they are setting the precedent.

  62. Re:Is this even legal? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    The problem is that there are states in which, if you don't have consent to record the call, it's illegal to record it. In these states, whether you attempted to obtain consent or not is likely irrelevant, even if the caller is a machine :(

    This gets into the other problem, of course. At least with spammers you can trace headers and nail 'em with their originating ISP. With phonespammers, they generally block their numbers, and the phone companies won't let you find out who they are without a hell of a fight. So finding out whom to charge is damn near impossible, even in the case of egregious violators like the piece of human shit that called me from AT&T - for the third time after I'd explicitly said "Place this number on your do not call list" - and who refused to give me his name (and who hung up immediately!) when I informed him of his violation of TCPA.

  63. Re:Anouther reason I only have a cell phone by aiken_d · · Score: 1

    Is this true (about it being illegal)?

    I only have a cell phone, which is great because 1) PacBell sucks and I no longer give them a monthly check, and 2) I only have one number, so people don't have to chase me around and leave messages all over the place.

    The problem is that telemarketers drive me nuts, since other than them, only people I want to talk to have the number. I usually bust them with "This is a cell phone, and you just dragged me out of a meeting with my biggest client," but I would love to have some legal ammo to use when they persist:

    Drone: I ... am ... calling ... to ... offer ... you ... a ... valuable... -

    Me: Hello? Is this a sales call? This is a cell phone and I just left a meeting with my biggest account because I'm expecting an urgent call.

    Drone: I ... understand ... your ... objections ... but ... this ... service ... will ... save ... -

    Me: It's already cost me money. Please don't call this number again.

    Drone: I ... understand ... your ... objections ... but ... this ... service ...

    Me: click.

    Cell phone: ring

    --
    If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
  64. Nonono, let them talk to Eliza! by TheLink · · Score: 2

    I'm sure with voice recognition etc we can whip something up-

    Computer: Hi I'm Eliza.
    Marketeer:
    C: Does it please you to believe that you're from XXXX and have a great offer for me?
    M: Yes!
    C: Hmmm....Interesting, could you explain a little bit better?"
    M:
    C: You seem quite sure!
    ..
    C: I'm actually quite boring, lets talk about you..

    And so on :).

    Link.

    --
  65. Re:HOW? by demon · · Score: 1

    Probably the beep after the announce message. Seems the most likely method.
    _____

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  66. Illegal in the entire U.S, and they won't do it. by seebs · · Score: 4

    alan.cohen@abc.com already confirmed that they are *NOT* doing this.

    You see, prerecorded calls are *ILLEGAL*, in general, under the TCPA. The prospect of $500 minimum statutory damages *PER PERSON* probably stopped them.

    Anyway, this is old news, it went through the TCPA lists a few days ago, and it's already dead.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  67. Re:Is this even legal? (it's a wardialer) by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    In the UK anyway we have a law that prohibits making calls "without intent to communicate" to stop people running wardialers searching for modems.

    Sounds like quite a similar situation to me.

  68. I hope you have CLID in the US by Baki · · Score: 1

    Like most european countries. Then you see (and your phone equipment too) the source telephone number.

    One could program ones equipment to drop any calls from sources that either don't send CLID or that are on a blacklist (or not on a friends-list).

    In fact I never answer the phone when I don't see the source phone number (people can block the CLID if they want to; in that case I don't need to talk to them).

  69. Re:Here is the link` by GossG · · Score: 1
    Since NYT (I think) requires a registration cookie that I set up sometime in the past, here is the most important paragraph from the article.

    When asked if ABC would ever consider voice-mail broadcasting again, Mr. Cohen said: "It's something we're putting aside. Our comfort level was just not there, and I don't think that'll change."

    So howls of outrage by potential customers do affect some marketers

  70. Re:Take me off your calling list by mrBoB · · Score: 1

    I thought the Telecommunications act of '96 made leaving commercial ads on your answering machine illegal? It wasn't _all_ bad ;-)

  71. Re:i agree... by Amanset · · Score: 1

    Channel Four, mate, not the BBC. You may find it hard to believe but we have commercial television in the UK as well.

  72. Re:What's the problem? by McKing · · Score: 1

    Oh, shit!
    You just gave them another idea....

    --
    If only "common" sense was actually that common...
  73. Anonymous Call Rejection by sulli · · Score: 1
    You're right, ACR is garbage. It's really designed to reject individuals who have Caller ID blocking - I think the telcos market it so that those with blocking will get annoyed, unlock, and then conveniently (for the telcos) expose themselves to marketers and so on.

    I tend to think that the right approach would be a federal law requiring a working Caller ID number for all telemarketers, with a penalty for violation of $2000 per call. Then Caller ID box makers could add it to their list, or some enterprising soul could create a MAPS RBL equivalent...

    sulli

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  74. Yup these machines are illegal for commercial use by btempleton · · Score: 2

    And I've won $500 claims in courts against people using them. Right now I have to get around to getting a company called Independent Mortgage in Dana Point, CA, which uses one.

    I think you should get $1500 but I couldn't convince the smaill claims court commissioner, even though I had documentary evidence the other guy was perjuring himself.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  75. Anyone but norm! by tssm0n0 · · Score: 1

    Talking to Norm MacDonald might be cool, but having a recording of Norm talk to a machine recording it is not.

    I could understand how it would be cool to meet him face to face, but leaving recordings of Norm Macdonald's voice on people's answer machines is just cruel. Have you people heard his voice? Its sounds like a robot that's being kicked in the nuts.

  76. Even Worse --- by HerrNewton · · Score: 1

    And more obvious offense if you're like me and pay a small fee per voice mail message received. (i.e., US$.01 for the initial time you listen to the message; free after that). If ABC or any other company were to leave me a commercial voice mail, it seems to me that I'd be able to sue them under the same law that prevents junk faxes.

    Anyway, do what I do when companies ask for a phone number: give them your cell number. Why? It's quite illegal for them to call you for commercial purposes---it's a clear shift of the advertising cost to the target rather than the advertiser. If you need to call them, you can still do so through your land line.

    Norwest/Wells Fargo ONLY has my cell number; the few times they've called me about "refinancing your mortgage" (okay, I'm a student and have about $7.56 in my checking account...) I simply interrupt and say, "this is a cell phone". As long as I get that out in the first minute (incoming calls, first minute doesn't count against my air time), it's really no problem and has the effect of cascading through "don't bother calling" lists. And I can get telemarketing calls anywhere... class, the bathroom, in my car, at lunch, at work, etc. Quite fun to answer, "This is a cell phone and this is a really inconvient time--I need one hand to hold my book and the other to wipe, after all.)

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  77. Re:Another reason I only have a cell phone by rdarden · · Score: 1
    Right on, I do the same thing for many reasons. I love not getting telespam, and with cable modem service I almost don't need a landline...

    ...except that the cable modem service is so unreliable that I still need a landline and ISP for the downtimes.

    The only downside about getting all of your calls on your cell phone is that there are never answering machine messages to check when you get home. Of course, you're never depressed that you have no messages. Say.. this ABC plan is a good idea. Never come home to an empty answering machine!

  78. Re:The effect on the Community by ODiV · · Score: 1

    Not a bad read. I've got a couple problems with it though.

    "And, except that all newcomers to /. arrive as AC's themselves, or maybe they haven't learned about changing their thresholds, and so they see ALL OF IT. Every last damn word."

    Isn't the default threshold at 1 for ACs?

    I don't agree that everything below 2 is crap. There are some good posts that remain as 0s and 1s. They're just not as interesting/insightful/etc. as other posts. Moderators do tend to catch the spam and mod it down to -1. So all spam ends up as -1. I do agree that this is wasting moderation points and also discourages people from reading at -1 (and seeing badly modded posts).

    A little revision wouldn't hurt. Not that I'm doing anything to fix the spam problem. It'd be cool if /. could just make it so only the spammer saw his postings, then he'd presumably get bored and go away (I don't know how well this would work for ACs on /. though).

    Kuro5hin.org has a no tolerance stance on spam. Freedom of speech != spam. Don't know if the /. editors would have time to go through everything and delete the junk. Maybe they could hire someone... Although some people would probably scream bloody murder.

  79. Telemarketer Revenge by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    I unwittingly managed to create a Telemarketer Trap using my answering machine. My message is a very quick "Leave a message after the tone".

    The device that calls poor unsuspecting rubes during their dinner will first ensure that someone picked up the phone and said something. Then it tries to connect a telemarketer to that line, but it usually takes about 3 seconds (which is longer than my message). The net result is that the telemarketer gets to hear the sound of my answering machine recording a message.

    I get about 2 messages a week consisting of "Hello? Hello? Helllloooooooooo?"

    I get great satisfaction out of wasting their time, for a change.

  80. You're too late. by ParticleGirl · · Score: 1

    Due to a backlash, ny New York Times reported on the 22nd, "ABC has backed away from a controversial plan to use sitcom stars like Norm MacDonald to promote its fall lineup by leaving taped messages on the home answering machines of viewers.". The article can probably still be found at the New York Times for a fee. The funniest promotional idea of theirs, though, can be found in the bathroom.

    --
    Do something about world hunger. Click here
  81. A better system by Siqnal+11 · · Score: 1

    Why not ban unsolicited commercial direct marketing? What would happen?

    Well, the US Post Office would get an exemption on the grounds that junk mail subsidises other mail (or at least it should; I'm not sure if it's really not the other way around).

    For phone, fax, and email direct marketing, a new business would be created. Consumers would get paid to opt-in. You could fill out a marketing demographic survey, and then you would get a credit on your phone bill paid for by the direct marketers who called you.

    With opt-in systems, consumers get paid for putting up with advertising. Those who don't want the advertising pay their own way. This is already happening with ISPs. This is also how TV works (you can get free TV with ads, or premium/rental services without).

    --

    --
    You are a fucking moron.
    1. Re:A better system by egburr · · Score: 1
      This is also how TV works (you can get free TV with ads, or premium/rental services without).

      Not quite. You can get a few channels of free TV with ads and static, you can get a lot of channels of pay TV with ads, or you can get a few premium channels of high-pay TV without ads, but you still have to buy the pay TV with ads, also. (i.e broadcast, cable, and premium (which requires cable))

      Edward Burr

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  82. Re:Telemarketers can be a source of entertainment! by gorilla · · Score: 2

    I've found that people trying to sell phone long distance are a great source of amusement. Asked how many long distance calls I make, I tell them none, cause I don't have any friends. "Will you be my friend. PLEEEEEEEASSSEEEEEE. We can go to hockey games any everything. PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEE EEEEE."

  83. A modest proposal for passive Slashdotting by fritter · · Score: 1

    I suggest everyone on Slashdot, when called by a telemarketer, say "I'm sorry, I can't buy X because of turnip", and then hang up.

    You have to think telemarketers will get confused after the 30th person who won't buy a magazine because of "turnip".

  84. point - counter point by eyeball · · Score: 2

    Hell, I think this is a good idea! They should make these types of telemarketing calls legal, and outlaw all other types. This way, when I get home from work, all I have to do is keep my finger hovered over the delete button to trash the telemarket calls. And when I'm home and physically pick up the phone, I'd be guarenteed that there's not going to be a sales pitch at the other end.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  85. Re:OPT OUT OF TELEMARKETING! by eaolson · · Score: 1
    It's the Direct Marketing Association, guy. They have some pretty stringent rules, and I believe that there are some laws that require direct marketers to follow the rules.
    Actually, no. The DMA keeps a Mail Supression List and will put you name, address and phone number on it if you request. But its use by a direct mail company is completely optional. They are free to ignore it if they so choose. I think the DMA even charges for access to it. The DMA's purpose is not to act as a consumer advocate, but to prevent government regulation of direct mail. More information at: EcoFuture
  86. PRODUCT IDEA! by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1

    I love it. HEY, EMBEDDED PROGRAMMERS! Here's something that would sell like hotcakes.
    --

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  87. Re:ABC has dumber ideas than this. by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

    Fsck it all, if I hear one of those things go off while I'm taking a leak, that box is going to say hello to Mr. Leatherman. Then I'm going to start slowly mailing pieces of it to ABC and demanding ransom.

    There's got to be a more direct way of affecting change in big corps' marketing depts. Vigilantiism, for instance.
    --

    --
    Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
  88. Re:Okay, you're kidding, right? by Br00se · · Score: 1

    Exactly, telemarketing is a much bigger issue than handguns on a bedside table.

  89. RTFM by scribblej · · Score: 1
    I live in Chicago, too. I get those calls, too. They suck!

    Not the point, though. Next time you've got a message on your system you don't wan to hear, hit 337 on your dial pad. It fast-forwards to the end and deletes the message, effectively a "skip and delete" command. I use it all the time. 339 will skip and save, FYI.

  90. Re:So that's what all those hang ups have been for by PolyDwarf · · Score: 1

    Although I'm going to sound like a moronic newsgroupie, me too.
    For the past month or so, I've been getting on the order of 10-15 calls a day (According to my caller-ID), and exactly zero messages on my machine. All of the calls are listed as unavailable. It's gotten to the point where I don't answer the phone when it's listed as unavailable, because I'm wasting my time. Sure enough, when the answering maching picks up, no one leaves a message.
    Side note: I had my answering machine message really short (Something like "Leave a message").. It confused the telemarketers because they never got on the line in time to hear the message and I got a lot of messages saying "Uhhh, hello? Hello? Is anyone there? "
    :)

  91. Re:Telemarketers by Van+Halen · · Score: 1
    A former roommate of mine used to do something similar:

    Telemarketer: [sales spiel]
    Him: I'm interested, let me go find my credit card...
    Him: [checking back every 5 or 10 minutes] I almost found my credit card, hold on, just another minute...
    Repeat until the poor sucker finally gives up.

  92. Re:There oughtta be a law by Cramer · · Score: 1

    Simple, get ISDN and then REFUSE calls that don't provide a number. It's so satisfying to NACK a call setup request -- no phone rings; I don't have to clear a channel (hang up); nothing... the D channel light flashes, an event is logged and that's the end of it. They get a friendly "your call did not go through" message :-) That alone is worth 85$ per month.

    I also like being able to do a fast reverse number lookup (I know it's a "wrong number") and tell the caller who they are and that they most certainly have the wrong number. [My ISDN line is for data, not inbound voice.] One poor lady in Clearwater FL almost had a heart attack when I did that -- she kept dialing the wrong number (mine) every 15 minutes for an entire day.

  93. We get this... by rnturn · · Score: 2

    ...all the time in the Chicago area. It's getting to the point where nearly half of the phone calls we receive have `dead air' on the other end. Then, some time later, we get a call from a real telemarketer. The current theory is that the telemarketers have their computer call to see if anyone's at home, then queue up the call to one of their telemarketing drones who make the real call.

    OK, this isn't exactly what the main posting's about. But this is: I have received several messages on our Ameritech voice mail containing what sound like computer synthesized messages. Mostly regarding whether I want/need new cellular service (Hint to Motorola: NO TO BOTH QUESTIONS!) Since I cannot fast forward through voice mail on Ameritech's service, this really torques me off. If it keeps up I'll have to cancel my voice mail and go back to a tape machine. Wonder if I complain to Ameritech enough whether they'll do anything about the annoyance... Nah! What am I thinking?


    --

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  94. Okay, you're kidding, right? by slockhar · · Score: 1

    Is this coming from the same place where one in three has a handgun on the bedside table? I think you have more surmountable issues to address.

  95. Here's an evil revenge plot... by Sick+Boy · · Score: 3

    Just a theory, but playing data CD's through speakers can blow them out. Why not hook up your old walkman with a 100 Free Hours On AOL! cd to a big red button on your phone that turns off your receiver (to avoid damaging it), then starts to play the cd? Should fry the telescum's (usually non-cheap) equipment, yes?

    Ah, just a thought. At least until I get some schematics.
    --

    --
    Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    1. Re:Here's an evil revenge plot... by adolf · · Score: 1

      (Score:-1, OffTopic)

      Sorry, but AOL CDs won't damage speakers. Or phones. Or anything else (except the minds of youth everywhere).

      There's nothing particularly damaging about an ISO-9660 CD, except for the fact that they tend to generate high-frequency audio when treated as Red Book.

      These high-frequency noises will tend to be quite loud, but no louder than the maximum level of a normal CD. They will be routed (by way of the crossover) to your tweeters.

      The only problem here is that most tweeters can only dissipate a few (less than 10) Watts of energy -- but most will safely handle 1 Watt, all day. How loud is a single Watt?

      If we assume the speakers in question have a sensetivity of 88dB @ 1 Watt, 1 meter from the radiating surface (a fairly common median spec, for home audio), and that you've got two of them (stereo), we're up to 91dB at 1 meter of distance from the speakers.

      Now, sound at STP in an anechoic free-field enviroment is absorbed and diffused by air at the rate of 6dB for every doubling of distance.

      But, standard homes aren't anechoic - the reverberations will tend to reinforce the original waveform, so the transmission loss will not quite be 6dB.

      So, if you're six feet away, you'll be hearing AOL 5.0 at at *least* 85dB -- which most people would consider quite loud enough to turn down immediately (even to the point of tripping over the desk in an attempt to get to the volume knob), given the nature of the noise and the human ear's increased high-frequency sensitivity.

      At the same time, this brief stint of horribly loud AOL 5.0 being played through your speakers will be at the reasonably safe level of 1 Watt.

      Even if we assume that the volume knob is initially turned up to a point at which more than 1 Watt is generated, it wouldn't much matter. We, as humans, tend to have fairly fast reflexes (and tend to get faster as percieved amplitude of sudden sound increases), you'll get off your ass turn it down long before anything bad happens to your speakers.

      Incidentally, those loudspeakers which operate full range (ie, without a tweeter, such as about all Bose ilk) will be largely absolutely immune to things like this.

      And, at any rate, most CD players simply mute the output when asked to play a data track. I have the (perhaps unfortunate) privelege of owning one that doesn't, but it predates CD-ROM.

      The first premise thus disproven, I shall henceforth move on:

      The digital switches that just about all telephone companies use these days (and certainly all of the telemarketers) will filter sounds not within the 300-3,000Hz POTS standard. There are further (hardware-based) limitations on minimum and maximum amplitude.

      So, a good chunk of that lovely high-freq AOL 5.0 will be thrown out, and there are hard liminitations on just how loud the final signal can be. I don't have precise numbers, as I'm not a telco person (and I don't want to be one), but I'd say that it's a safe assumption that reaching any of these limits will not harm any telephone equipment, as these limitations are reached regularly even in normal speech.

      End result? You, shouting over the phone, will cause as much damage (ie, none) to the telemarker's equipment as AOL 5.0, and will probably be much more effective at souring the poor glutton's mood.

      So, just yell at them. Call them names. Make fun of their mother. Just don't threaten them, and legally, all's well. If enough people did this, they'll quit their job for something less tiring.

      And if enough of them quit, labor prices for telemarketers will go up to the point that it would no longer be a profitable enterprise, and the responsible companies would be forced onto some new frontier such as spam and/or chapter 11.

      'Tis a shame that class action never works.

  96. Sounds like an opportunity to make some money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you put a messgae like: "By leaving a message on this machine you agree to be billed for $500/minute by the owner of this phone." Then send an invoice.

  97. Good ol' ABC... by brogdon · · Score: 1

    Here at ABC we're breaking new ground and pioneering new ways to annoy people and attract bad press. Now that America's answering machines have been conscripted into our ranks, we're turning to other opportunities to push our way into your lives and annoy you at the same time. Opportunities like our teams of cat burglars, who will sneak into your bedrooms and change you default browser's homepage to Go.com. And don't forget our Disney DVD's that come chock full of annoying previews that'll make your kids cry for copies of our films. We're so full of useful innovation!

    ABC... definitely.




    --Brogdon

    --


    This tagline is umop apisdn.
  98. The Solution by phUnBalanced · · Score: 1

    Call the operator after they hang up on you. Explain that you are receiving prank calls, etc.. whatever it takes to bother them. Everyone do this. Do it EVERY time this happens. The phone company will become so bogged down, they'll demand ABC stop doing it.

  99. Heh by British · · Score: 1

    Back in the days, I got an operator to talk to an answering machine. I recorded an outgoing message in advance on a different number.

    Me: Operator, I'd like to third-party bill a long distance phone call please.
    op: The number?
    Me: (gives number)
    op: calling
    Answering machine: Hello?(my voice).......
    Operator to answering machine: Will you accept the charges for blah blah blah?
    Answering machine: ....... yes, I accept.

    The operator patched the call through. She didn't realize she was talking to an answering machine(I put a long pause before "hello?" and "I accept") or the fact the outgoing message had the same voice as me. Heh.

  100. ABC has dumber ideas than this. by generic-man · · Score: 2

    Even if the answering machine plan has been cancelled, people using urinals may soon hear wise-ass remarks from ABC star Norm MacDonald as they try to do their business. It's all part of ABC's new strategy: "ABC: As If 'Is That Your Final Answer?' Was Annoying Enough."

    BTW, other companies have used answering machines to send advertising. It's similar to "Important Memos!" about vacation packages in Florida coming through the fax machines of office buildings. The phone system where I now work was hit three months ago with telemarketers calling at 5:00 AM and leaving voice mail commercials. Funny thing was, the quality was so bad, you couldn't hear what they were saying over the staticky background music.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  101. WAR dial Regis and Kathy lee... by ChiaBen · · Score: 1

    I happened to have Regis and Kathy Lee on this morning by mistake, and they showed a clip from a few years back when someone had dialed the wrong number and gotten on the show by mistake... kinda funny their phone just starts ringing in the middle of them talking...

    I just think it'd be funny for someone to WAR dial this number as a response... it would be no different than what ABC si doing... well...

    --
    "If voting could really change things, it would be illegal. " - Revolution Books, NY
  102. Re:Is this even legal? by jbuchana · · Score: 1

    I've had a few cases recently where what sounded like real humans left telamarketing messages. I laughed, thinking that they were pretty stupid expecting a response.

    Now I wonder if they called intending to leave an advertising message.

    Well, about I ever use the land-line phone for anymore is 'net access, when the cable modems make I to my neighborhood, it might go.

    When the telemarketers get a hold of my cell phone number (I don't even let the people at work know *that*), then I'm going to scream.

    --
    Jim Buchanan
  103. If this catches on by Gen-GNU · · Score: 1

    If this starts a trend, and all kinds of businesses start calling to leave advertisements, how long will it be before you can buy an answering machine that automatically detects if the incoming message is on tape, then drops the call and removes the message?
    I am guessing the company that came up with the technology to determine if the other end is a human or an answering machine already has this product developed, and is just waiting to sell a bunch of product A to companies to help sell product B to consumers.

    Must be monday....I'm always cynical on monday. =)

  104. Re:Dissapointing by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    FIGHT!

    For your right!

    To make /. AC spam-free

    Remember the good old days, when the biggest problem with AC posts was the First Post! post?

    Kinda makes ya nostalgic, don't it?

    t_t_b
    --
    I think not; therefore I ain't®

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  105. This is illegal! by babbage · · Score: 2
    Check out the boilerplate I send when I get junk email. It cites the following material from US Code:
    US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C):

    "It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States to use any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine"

    A "telephone facsimile machine" is defined in Sec.227(a)(2)(B) as:

    "equipment which has the capacity to transcribe text or images (or both) from an electronic signal received over a regular telephone line onto paper."

    Sounds close enough to me. Can we have this shot down before it gets out of control? IANAL of course, but I think we can defend against this...



  106. i just harass them by paTroll · · Score: 1

    i get lots of those messages, and they ususally say "call this number for more information or to schedule an appointment". then, when you call it, they tell you to leave a message with your phone number and a good time to call you back. I use this opportunity to leave nonsense on their machine. Then I do it again.. and again.. and again..

    pt

    --
    Will the real Richard Stallman please stand up?
  107. Call Privacy by Malc · · Score: 3

    It was because of telemarketers that I got a call privacy package added to my phone service. Although I hate giving more money to the telco, it's preferable to dealing with those other wankers.

    For those who don't know about or have access to call privacy, it does the following: for all anonymous or blocked calls, the caller is intercepted and forced to say their name (or my name as some of my friends at the office would do!). When I pick up the phone I get to hear the message and either refuse it, answer it, or send it to voice mail. For my friends with cell phones, or co-workers, who don't show up on my caller ID display, I've told them a simple code to bypass the system so that they don't hang around.

  108. I like to put those on headset and sing to them. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    It is worth the wait to sing to the lovely recorder call for hold people.



    --Perianwyr Stormcrow

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  109. Descent 3 at Macworld by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    They were selling it at 14 bucks a pop at the Javits Center show in NYC last year until they sold out.

  110. A better modification... by blogan · · Score: 1

    This is what I had on my machine last year:

    Bill: Hello, you have reached Bill and Bryan's room. We are
    Bryan: Hello?!?! .....this is still the answering machine. Please leave a message.

    It confused quite a few people. However, one time, I came home right during my part on the machine and picked up "Yes, this is really me now. Seriously. Hello?" but they hung up by then.

  111. Re:Radio Shack device used to dump anon+out of are by Br00se · · Score: 1

    If anyone knows were I can get a device like this, please let me know. I've been searching for one for quite a while.

  112. Re:More On ABC Ads by egburr · · Score: 1

    They just don't get it, do they? Their idea is "to catch the ear of young men during a quiet, relaxed and attention-grabbing moment." I get few enough quiet relaxed moments already, and they want to annoy me then?

    Edward Burr

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  113. the beast of burden by paTroll · · Score: 1

    Harken slapped the mule to get it going. With heavy feet, the creature ambled on down the road away from the trading post. Harken had made his monthly foray into civilization, once again loading the mule with everything from waybread to a large stone sledge.

    As they made their way down the road and the outpost faded into the countryside, Harken slapped the mule again. The mule had not stopped, or shown any signs of slowing, but Harken felt like slapping it so he did. Harken was a man who liked hitting things.

    The journey from the outpost to Harken's den would take four days. It was always the worst part of the month - the eight days to and from tne outpost to restock his supplies. He guessed the mule liked it, however, because it was all the walking the mule was allowed to do.

    Monotonous though the journey was, it was necessary. The monthly allowance from his master only afforded the necessary supplies for the month - there was not even enough left over for a room at the outpost and a woman for the night. But then, his master demanded secrecy, and Harken was not a man to risk displeasing the master.

    The mule hated Harken. It hated him with every fiber of its being. It was hard being a mule to begin with, being the bastard child of horse and donkey, but being Harken's mule was even worse. The man left it tied up for three weeks of every month, left there to stand and sleep in its own feces. Then, on these trips, Harken loaded the mule until its back felt like breaking, and slapped it all the way back to the den.

    The mule was not keen, and never considered itself so. It did pride itself in doing a bit of thinking every now and then, when it wasn't focused on hating Harken, and it decided that it would have to formulate a plan. Someway to rid itself of Harken and the whole business.

    Four days later, after Harken had unloaded the mule and was preparing to tether it again, the mule suddenly bucked and kicked him in the head. Laying dizzy on the ground, Harken opened his eyes just in time to see the mule's hooves coming down upon his chest, crushing his ribs, as the mule charged off into the wilderness.

    --
    Will the real Richard Stallman please stand up?
  114. How is this done? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    How wound a computer be able to detect whether it's an answering machine on the other line or a human?

    Would it be possible to nab them by somehow tricking their machine into thinking that you're an answering machine rather than a real human?

  115. More On ABC Ads by Katya · · Score: 1
    Yahoo! News has this article about ABC's marketing plans: http://dailyn ews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000718/re/abc_advertising_dc_ 1.html

    Seems its more than just the answering machine blitz, but also a urinal blitz. Thank God I don't have to worry about that one!

    ABC's 'Norm' Catches Audience with Their Trousers Down

    NEW YORK (Reuters) - In a promotional campaign for one of its TV comedies, the ABC network may have redefined the concept of bathroom humor.

    The U.S. network's idea is to catch the ear of young men during a quiet, relaxed and attention-grabbing moment -- while they are relieving themselves at the urinal.

    ...."
  116. My room mate's answering machine message by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    My room mate's answering machine message demands that, if the caller is a telemarketer, they remove my room mate's name from their call list and do not call back.

    A local hardware store sells a little button you can push when you get a call from a telemarketer. It plays a pre-recorded request to remove you from their call list, quotes the approproate legal passages at them, and disconnects.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  117. Re:Federal law applies to ALL states by dougsyo · · Score: 1

    A "Susan Richards" from Harris Publishing called me not too long ago, offering to place me in the Oak Hill High School alumni directory. That high school isn't local to this area, nor did I attend it. I saw it was "out of area" so I didn't answer it, bhey left a message on my answering machine, with an 800-546-2533 number to return the call.

    When I returned the call, I found the person at the other end was rather accustomed to offended people calling back:
    - they knew that since nothing was being sold it was not an "illegal" telemarketing call
    - they were well-trained to keep a calm demeanor in the face of an obviously irate client

    But, venting for a few minutes got it off my chest, and it was on their nickel.

    Doug

  118. Telemarketers can be a source of entertainment! by Izaak · · Score: 5
    One day I was watching Highlander and was interrupted by a telemarketer trying to sell me life insurance. I promptly told him I that, being immortal, I had no need to for life insurance. I then tried to sell him the secret of immortality. After a few minutes, he became very flustered and hung up. I laughed for about an hour.

    Most recently, MCI called trying to sell me long distance. I acted amazed at hearing another human voice, and revealed that I had been 'hiding in my Y2K bunker for the last 7 months!' My roommate even got in on it and began shouting in the background about 'cracking open the airlock'. It was a riot!

    Other ideas I have tried:

    1. If they are trying to sell you a newspaper or magazine, insist that you are psychic and do not need their product, then become disgusted by what they are thinking at that moment.

    2. Act like you are in the midst of hostage negotiations. Play the cop side of the conversation. "So if I agree to subscribe to that magazine, will you release some of the hostages?"

    3. In an agitated and paranoid voice, ask them how they got the number. Insist that they are lying and are really 'part of the conspiracy' or 'one of them'. There are endless possibilities with this one.

    There are also some really great things you can do with a prepared tape of sound effects.

    Have fun!

    Thad

  119. Re:Federal law applies to ALL states by PSwiss · · Score: 1

    If ABC were bound by this it would be in violation, but under exemptions in the document it states:

    The following acts or practices are exempt from this Rule:
    (c) Telephone calls in which the sale of goods or services is not completed, and payment or authorization of payment is not required, until after a face-to-face sales presentation by the seller;

    Since ABC is definitly not selling the callee anything (they're selling viewers to advertisers) I don't belive this applies to their calls.

    Also ABC's plan doesn't quite fit the documents definition of telemarketing:

    (u) Telemarketing means a plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to induce the purchase of goods or services by use of one or more telephones and which involves more than one interstate telephone call. The term does not include the solicitation of sales through the mailing of a catalog which: contains a written description or illustration of the goods or services offered for sale; includes the business address of the seller; includes multiple pages of written material or illustrations; and has been issued not less frequently than once a year, when the person making the solicitation does not solicit customers by telephone but only receives calls initiated by customers in response to the catalog and during those calls takes orders only without further solicitation. For purposes of the previous sentence, the term "further solicitation" does not include providing the customer with information about, or attempting to sell, any other item included in the same catalog which prompted the customer's call or in a substantially similar catalog.

    ABC is not selling anything, and the calls would have to be interstate if ABC were to be bound by this, and just looking at cost ABC would probably set up call centers in the cities in question and get around this.

    If there is a federal law that would stop ABC this is not it.

  120. Re:They have already caned this plan by WNight · · Score: 2

    Oh sure, like picking up the phone and hearing a busy signal isn't going to be weird. If that happened, I'd call the phone company and report something broken.

    'Just like an advertisment on TV', sure, except that TV shows are free, the phone and voice mail are payed for already.

    I'd support a complete ban on any unsolicited commercial calling, and a $500 fine or something hefty to back it up. With jail time for anyone found repeat offending.

  121. Anouther reason I only have a cell phone by bluGill · · Score: 2

    It is illegal to make unsolicitated calls to a cell phone (US for sure, not sure about other countires) because I pay for the time. I don't answer my land line phone, as that is for the computer, and will soon be cancled when something better comes through. Turns out that with free long distance it is cheaper for me and my roommates to use a cell phone with 600-1000 (day vs weekend) mintues a month.

  122. This is funny. by FPhlyer · · Score: 3

    The ABC Friday lineup simply SUCKS. They have nothing good (in the way of post-adolescent) programming on Friday nights. I guess they are hoping that someone is going to listen to their answering machine and somehow come away saying "...must ... watch ... Sabrina the Teenage Witch..." or "Gee, let me listen to that most annoying theme song to 'Boy Meets World' JUST ONE MORE TIME!"

    Give it up ABC. Why not take friday nights and put on back to back episodes of the Drew Carey Show and Who's Line is it Anyway? like you did all week long during the last few months?

    Or howabout a new "reality television" show called "Who Wants to be a Pauper?" where we watch failed contestants from "Who Wants to be a Millionare" try to survive among the nations homeless eating rats and fishing street drains for cigarette butts? (Each week one of the contestants would be voted out and forced to play "Big Brother" - a fate worse than "MTV's Real World". The final contestant gets a chance to slap Regis and choke him with his monocrome tie.

    --
    Brought to you by Frobozz Magic Penguin Fodder.
  123. Re:Is this even legal? by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
    "Hi, this is Rand Race. I'm in a drug induced stupor right now and cannot find the phone. If you are a telemarketer please take me off your list and fuck off after the beep. If you are an aquantaince you should know I never listen to my messages so call back later.... (beep)"

    I wonder if an automated system telling another automated system to remove the first automated system from the calling list of the second automated system would work? Probably require yet another automated system to edit the list.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  124. And the prize goes to..... by Malk-a-mite · · Score: 1
    from the nytimes story:
    "If you had Norm MacDonald call you and remind you his show was on, we thought it would be fun, the type of thing people usually tell their friends about,"

    Give them a prize for missing the point.
    Talking to Norm MacDonald might be cool, but having a recording of Norm talk to a machine recording it is not.

    Malk-a-mite

  125. Isn't there a law against this? by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

    I thought there was some kind of law that prevented a company or organization from making automated calls.

    Isn't there also an unwanted soliciation law that if a person requests to be removed from the list and calls are still placed the company could face penalty charges for each call.

    I also wonder if the ABC station where there testing this is up for renewal on their liscense, because I know I'd file a complaint!

    Oh well, maybe they should just learn to put a better lineup over the air, don't change it around every two weeks, and give plenty of warning when new shows are added or dropped.

  126. Who's? by mattsouthworth · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the name of the show be "WHOSE Line is it Anyway?" Imagine if there was an editor at /., who simply looked at every posting before mister taco put it up...

  127. Please call me, I can use the money by one-egg · · Score: 2
    US Code Title 47, Section 227 makes this a very profitable enterprise for the victim. Some helpful extracts:

    (3) The term ''telephone solicitation'' means the initiation of a telephone call or message for the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, goods, or services, which is transmitted to any person, [unless based on a prior relationship]

    It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States ... (B) to initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes or is exempted by rule or order by the Commission under paragraph (2)(B);

    (3) Private right of action A person or entity may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State, bring in an appropriate court of that State - (A) an action based on a violation of this subsection or the regulations prescribed under this subsection to enjoin such violation, (B) an action to recover for actual monetary loss from such a violation, or to receive $500 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, [emphasis added] or (C) both such actions. If the court finds that the defendant willfully or knowingly violated this subsection or the regulations prescribed under this subsection, the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

    In other words, if ABC calls you and either (a) hangs up without talking to you or (b) leaves a prerecorded message on your answering machine, you can take them to small-claims court and get somewhere between $500 and $1500. Not bad for a day's work!

    Incidentally, this is the same section that prohibits junk faxes. It can be pretty profitable to read the entire statute.

  128. Unknown vs Anonymous by Ech3lon · · Score: 1

    I use BellSouth for my land line at home. They offer 'Anonymous Call Rejection'...but Anonymous is not the same as Unknown. Anonymous only applies to people who opt not to publish their number to CallerID. Anonymous Call Rejection does nothing to stop Unknown Name calls. So basically you end up paying for nothing with this service. Scam....si senor.

    --

    don't believe the hype

    1. Re:Unknown vs Anonymous by Refrag · · Score: 1

      I have BellSouth's ACR. It worked well for quite a while, but now I get a large percentage of Unavailable calls. I always joke with my girlfriend that I'm glad I have a good friend like Unavailable, they really do care. Anyway, my mother has some really cheap LD service, and they don't transmit her number, so I have to listen to the machine to see if Unavailable is her or a telemarketer. It really sucks.

      Refrag

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  129. I like to ask telemarketers what they are wearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and if they like hot grits

    thank you very much

  130. SPAM by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 2

    Ok. Lets see, what idiot came up with this plan in the first place, and how did it almost happen (even if it was canned). I mean, we all HATE spam in our inbox. I know that execs at ABC by now realize that we don't want unsolicited ads in our e-mail (though the thought probably occurred to them).

    In my e-mail box, I can read the subject ahead of time, and delete it.

    On my voicemail, I have to wait for that slow voice to read out all of the info on the message, or even play the darn thing, before I can burn it.

    Goodness, I'd rather get spam in my e-mail from them.

    Besides, how freaking effective do these idiots think such a marketting tactics would be. I mean, I don't always listen to a friend, a critic, or a stranger telling me to watch shows. Now an annoying machine, which is the only message on my machine will do the same thing.

    "Hello Dungeon Dweller. We know that we are the only message on your machine, that you have no friends and no life, so we decided to tell you that all of the cool people are watching 'Suddenly Susan' and her quirky antics. Byeeeeee."

    Yeah, that will sell great.


    We're all different.

    --
    Eh...
  131. You need to read more Douglas Adams by SigVn · · Score: 1

    "An answering machine is a device to talk to people you don't want to talk too. A VCR is a device to tape shows that you don't to watch"

    I think I got that more or less right.

    So what you do is connect your Answering machine to the VCR, then ABC Can talk to the VCR with out bothering you. Then hook up the VCR to your computer and pump the whole thing out on Gnutella. (This is so that all of us have the option of not watching the shows, more effective then if each of ignored the shows on our own.)

    Please do this right now, as I want to start stopping watching ABC soon.

    --
    Yes I can not spell...Wait....for a second there I almost cared.
  132. Re:Is this even legal? by PD · · Score: 5

    Here's your answer from the relevant US laws:

    From Subpart L - Restrictions on Telephone Solicitation

    a.2.Initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes or is exempted by sec. 64.1200(c)

    section c says this:

    c.The term "telephone call" in sec. 64.1200(a)(2) shall not include a call or message by, or on behalf of, a caller:
    1.that is not made for a commercial purpose,
    2.that is made for a commercial purpose but does not include the transmission of any unsolicited advertisement,
    3.to any person with whom the caller has an established business relationship at the time the call is made, or
    4.which is a tax-exempt nonprofit organization.

    So there you go! ABC is giving out $500 checks to everyone who is lucky enough to get a call! Make sure you save those answering machine tapes, boys and girls. The small claims court judge will want to listen to them. While you're at it, go over to www.junkbusters.com and print out a copy of the legislation for the judge. It should be a very easy case to win.

  133. Re:The effect on the Community by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    FIGHT!

    For your right!

    To make /. AC spam-free

    The Windows cut-n-paste K1dd13s strike again!

    t_t_b
    --
    I think not; therefore I ain't®

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  134. Re:Is this even legal? by PD · · Score: 1

    That should read "No person may initiate..." in section a.2 above. Sorry.

  135. Hurumph! by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 1

    How long do you think this will last? I predict an apology coming from ABC after people start to complain en-mass.. An' do they block call display?
    -

  136. Re:Telemarketers by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    I'd rather have messages on my machine, it only takes a second to delete if you've got a digial answerer and you don't have to go through the trouble of talking to the (often) moronic people on the line. However, what ABC is doing seems illegal, but I'm not sure on that, wonder if they got all the numbers off people sigining up for Who Wants to be a Millionaire?

    TM: Hi, this is [name] from [Big Marketing Company]. Would you be interested in...?
    Me: No thanks.
    TM: Are you confident?
    Me: Yes.
    TM: Is that your final answer?
    Me: That is my final answer.
    [Game show sounds in background]
    TM: No, I'm sorry. That is the wrong answer.

    =================================

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  137. Is this even legal? by crow · · Score: 5

    With normal telemarketing calls, US law says that I can tell them to put me on their do-not-call list, and they have to pay a $500 penalty if they then do call me (assuming I'm willing to go to the hassle of taking them to small claims court).

    With this, they hang up before I can ask to be put on that list. Does the law that requires them to honor such requests allow this?

    And what about bans on computer calling? Or do they have a real human talk to the answering machine (talk about a boring job)?

    1. Re:Is this even legal? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Telemarketing calls to cell phones are strictly illegal. Unlike land lines, cell phones have per minute (or second) charges and telemarketers are prohibited from calling them _AT ALL_. Now, if you have your home phone forwarded to your cell phone, there's no way they can know that -- just tell them and hang up. However, they can know the NPANXX they are dialing is a wireless number.

      Imagine a GSM phone registered in Cary, NC (Bellsouth DCS) online in Paris France... I can dial a local 919 number and it will ring a few seconds later in Paris! (at a cost of about 3$/min.) (I've actually done this.)

    2. Re:Is this even legal? by CrimsonDeath · · Score: 1
      2.that is made for a commercial purpose but does not include the transmission of any unsolicited advertisement,
      Doesn't this make it exempt, for at least the hanging up part? If they just hang up, they don't transmit any message...
    3. Re:Is this even legal? by evilquaker · · Score: 1
      they hang up before I can ask to be put on that list. Does the law that requires them to honor such requests allow this?

      A follow-up question: do they have to honor such requests if you don't say them live, but leave them in your answering machine message? I'm sure they have a loophole somewhere here...

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
    4. Re:Is this even legal? by egburr · · Score: 1
      It's easy to prove it if you live in a state that allows a single party to tape a phone call with or without the consent of the other party.

      I don't see that this has anything to do with it. Start the recorded conversation off with "I am recording this conversation. Is that okay with you? Hello? Hello? I'm recording this, and need to verify you give permission. Hello? Is anybody there? Is this a recording?". I would think that would get past the consent requirement, since you are very obviously trying to obtain consent.

      Edward Burr

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Is this even legal? by dane23 · · Score: 1

      "Telemarketing calls to cell phones are strictly illegal."
      And that is the EXACT reason why I have a cell phone and don't have a land line at all. It's so totally worth the money to not have to speak to telemarketers...Ever :)

      --


      Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
  138. Aural Spam by soulsteal · · Score: 1

    This sucks. Now you have to be verbally reminded of the upcoming shows on TGIF! Just when you though you could forget them!

  139. Not just ABC does it by emufreak · · Score: 2

    There's a radio station nearby where I live in the Bay Area that also drops such crap on your answering machine. I'd be rather pissed if I only got part of a message because the memory on my answering machine (I've got a digital answering machine, thus I said memory, not tape :) ) ran out because part of it was filled with an ADVERTISEMENT.

  140. Take me off your calling list by TwP · · Score: 2
    It seems like they are trying to get around the "please take me off your calling list" laws that many states have adopted. The jist of it is that if "Big Company" calls you, you can tell them to take you off their calling list. If "Big Company" calls you again, you can take them to court and win some money. Each subsequent call from "Big Company" means a bigger cash settlement for you. The only proof you need to supply is the date and time that "Big Company" called.

    If they never talk to a human, though, then they will never be subject to this law. Seems pretty sneaky to me.


    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------

  141. Tele-Commercials by Ka0s64 · · Score: 1

    How can anyone possibly see this as being a good idea? You come home on Friday afternoon and check your messages, and hear a commercial for TV shows, come on. At least you can just hang up on on tele-marketers, or hold an airhorn up to the phone. Perhaps ABC would like for everyone in these major cities to call in with ads for their personal businesses. The thought of people leaving ads on my answering machine is very disturbing!

    --
    --C:\DOS C:\DOS\RUN RUN\DOS\RUN
  142. OPT OUT OF TELEMARKETING! by FFFish · · Score: 2

    Go to http://www.the-dma.org/ and hunt around -- you'll find that you can OPT OUT of telemarketing, EMail marketing and EMail.

    It does work.

    --

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:OPT OUT OF TELEMARKETING! by FFFish · · Score: 2

      It's the Direct Marketing Association, guy. They have some pretty stringent rules, and I believe that there are some laws that require direct marketers to follow the rules.

      c/"EMail marketing"/"Junk Mail marketing"/ btw.

      It works. I called in and demanded that I be removed from the telemarketing and bulk mail lists. I *do not* receive telemarketing calls from any large businesses any more. The exceedingly few calls I've received have been from local carpet cleaners, and my own bank doing surveys.

      I get far less junk mail than I used to. It's not all gone, by any means, but it *is* reduced.

      I haven't attempted the EMail opt out. I don't believe it would be at all effective: most of the junk EMail I receive is obviously from nincompoops who wouldn't belong to the DMA.


      --

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  143. i agree... by jhoffmann · · Score: 1

    drew carey is a serious buzz-kill on that show. it's like he doesn't get the humor and role of clive anderson, yet tries to duplicate it. he's just not funny and every time he tries to explain the concept of scoring the game, i'm lucky that there's nothing sharp near me so i don't stab myself. i originally thought he just felt that he had to descend to the level of his audience, but the more i watch it, the more convinced i am that he just doesn't get it. the holdovers from the originaly english version (ryan and colin) make it worth watching otherwise.

    1. Re:i agree... by Malc · · Score: 1

      "every time he tries to explain the concept of scoring the game, i'm lucky that there's nothing sharp near me so i don't stab myself."

      For me, not understanding how Clive Anderson came up with his scores was all part of the unfuriating fascination and humo[u]r of the original!

  144. And this is a bad thing? by smack_attack · · Score: 1

    I wish they would ALL just call my answering machine. It's much easier to delete them that way and I don't have to deal with rude telemarketers wasting my time reading a script to the end even though the first words out of my mouth are: "no thanks, I don't want to subscribe/buy/get a loan/switch long distance blah blah your product/service" The world would be a better place if targeted marketing was a completely opt-in thing, but then we wouldn't have as many funny Jerky Boys audio files to make us laugh.

  145. Automated Phone Ads by feveron · · Score: 1
    Should their not be laws passed to prevent this kind of harassment just like spam?

    It's bad enough having to delete spam out of email but off of my answering machine too!?

    Good grief Charlie Brown, you've been spammed! Bruce

  146. Please read, very informative. by brandon · · Score: 1

    For all of you crazed -want-to-get-upset-, you can contact: Voice Mail Broadcasting in Irvine, Calif. (sorry, not link) and let them know of your discust with this process. They do this for many businesses, and give the user a busy signal or a beep if a human answers the phone. (I'd still be pretty upset if I was taking a nap to get woken up by a busy signal)

    However, ABC has pulled this decision to do this idea... BUT this has not stopped all of their ignorance though. Look at this idea:

    (From NYTimes Artical)
    ABC is, however, sticking with a plan for the 2000-2001 season to have restrooms in bars or restaurants fitted with digital audio chips that deliver spots promoting "Norm," using recordings of Mr. MacDonald that begin playing when people move around. Mr. Cohen said that plan "makes sense for 'Norm'; it's such a guy show."

    I personally don't want to have to listen to some guy talking about TV shows while being in the restroom. What restaurant would do this, and not have customers get upset?

    Whats your opinion, and what can we do to let ABC know that the world thinks they should fire their merketing team?

  147. This is a common practice with political campaigns by ostiguy · · Score: 2

    Candidate records a message, or has a heavy hitter speak on their behalf, and it gets pushed out, and hangs up if a real person answers, as it is only a computer on the other end.

    matt

  148. Re:Telemarketers by e-gold · · Score: 1

    I do this same thing. If everyone did it, they'd get a lot less pitches in (as it is, nobody has EVER called me and sold me something -- 39 years and you'd think they'd learn). I used to get angry and yell at them, but this method is far more effective, at the minimal cost of reducing your connectivity. Besides, it gives the poor schlub who took the job a bit of time to think about where he's going in life. Further, the phone company alerts me with that horrid noise when they've finally caught on to the fact that nobody's ever coming to the phone (cyberdonny and I are far from the only ones who use this trick).
    JMR

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  149. Convenient... by brutusbuck · · Score: 1

    The tele-marketing computer will hang up on me? I guess that'll save me the trouble.

  150. I think there might be an answer. by Tiger+Smile · · Score: 1

    I hate the idea of a hangup. I live with my girlfriend, who's ex kidnapped her little boy. It's been ten years and it's few people who can understand what she has been through. I knew her before and after the kidnapping. It took a huge toll on her.

    After the kidnapping, even now, she gets hangups. These calls bring on a nightmare for her. Her ex likes to call up and bother her. He knows the police and FBI cannot find him. He calls for only a few seconds without saying a thing, then hangs up.

    Now many companies, not just ABC are doing the recorded message bullshit. It's made life a living hell. I not only stopped watching cable, but got rid of cable all together because they are a group of inhuman maximized profits. Ok, I'm ranting, but I'm mad. Forgive me.

    We need a good way to fool these machines into thinking that there is a person there, so they hang up and don't leave a message. How does one hack a solution?

    --
    -- Prepared at the direction of, or to be sent to Legal Counsel, in anticipation of litigation. Attorney Client Pri
  151. I concur by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 2

    Yeah, the moderation on this was unfair. People should read the parent comments before moderating. /. does not provide a mechanism for conversation other than the posting forum, and therefore, answers and replies to such things are perfectly acceptable. Besides, this is a weblog, we're not writing a daggon book. What, do you really think that someday people are going to start buying the /. archives in paperback (not a bad idea ). At any rate, it may not describe heisman's uncertainty principle in relation to dickheads calling you with machines and leaving spam on your answering machine, but it is relevant converstation to the parent post. Those moderating this post, please read the parent as well.


    We're all different.

    --
    Eh...
  152. Re:Telemarketers by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Telemarketers never say "we'd like to sell you X." They now say "We'd like to tell you that you've been selected to receive X, with a no-risk trial for the next 30 days! All we need to do is confirm your address and billing information. Okay?"

    The fact that telemarketers now _tell_ you what you want to buy, instead of asking, is another type of "guerrilla" tactics that prey on stupid people.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  153. Dark Side by jbarnett · · Score: 2


    "I feel a distrubates in the force" - ObiWan

    Soon as some spammer pirates a copy of this software, all hell is going to break lose. Phone rings constanly, but everytime you answer it, it disconnects. You come home from work and have an entire tape filled with 500 messages, or 4 hours of "voice spam".

    Oh you don't think it will happen? Phone numbers are easy to get compared to email address. In fact most, if not all cities organsize a list for free, avaiable to spammers of "live" phone numbers, it is called the phone book.

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  154. Automated Telephone Surveys by milkman1 · · Score: 1

    The other day I got a phone call that said something lake:

    "Hi, this is (some generic name) with (some survey company), we are taking a random survey about (some boring subject), the results will be reported to newspapers, radio, and TV. Please press 1 to start the survey."

    At this point I hung up. If whoever was calling didn't care enough about my opinion to have a real person call... well too bad.

    It really concerns me though that surveys like this could be sold as true random dial surveys. It would seem to me that any such survey is omiting a large percentage of the sample space that is inteligent enough to be insulted by a survey like this (IQ>75? ;-)). Polling is a trickey enough matter that you shouldn't try to alienate most of your sample.

  155. Local radio station has been doing this for years by fence · · Score: 1

    A local radio station (KRFX FM in Denver) has been doing this for at least two years.

    They have a recording of their morning drive-time shockjocks calling people to remind them to listen to their morning show.

    something like:

    "Hello....Hello....Turn down your radio, I can't hear you....." ...etc

    kind of a prank call, but AFAIK, no one has every turned them in for doing this.
    ---
    Interested in the Colorado Lottery?

    --
    Interested in the Colorado Lottery or Powerball games?
    check out http://colotto.com
  156. HOW? by miss_america · · Score: 1

    How can they tell if a human anwsers or a machine?

    --
    -If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
  157. The only advantage of prerecorded messages.... by milkman1 · · Score: 1

    They aren't as hard to hang up on. For this reason, I suspect that they are less likey to sell the product which they are trying to sell anyways.

  158. Re:What we really need... by generic-man · · Score: 1

    What an innovative idea.

    BTW, I haven't seen this for sale in the longest time... it was too expensive, most likely.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  159. How boudt this... by The+Lethargic+Lad · · Score: 1

    In my state, PA, actually in my city, a telemarketer called someone that told them to put this person on their not to call list. He actually went through with a lawsuit and won. Now just by itself this isnt that significant but the trend caught on in my city(it is very small, population is 780) and what do you know, more lawsuits were filed and won. Needless to say, I dont hear many people around here getting phone spammed.

    --
    "The 85 I fear they don't got a clue."
  160. ABC Isn't the First by JeffMagnus · · Score: 1

    I don't know about everyone else or even how common this is, but I have received numerous telemarketing messages on my answering machine which were clearly intended to be recorded there. A normal telemarketing recording would start as soon as the machine picked up, but these clearly started "after the beep." I get so many hangup calls that it is hard for me to say that I have been affected by answering the phone when one of these beasts call.

  161. They have already caned this plan by jon323456 · · Score: 5

    According to the NYTimes, they killed this plan already: "ABC has backed away from a controversial plan to use sitcom stars like Norm MacDonald to promote its fall lineup by leaving taped messages on the home answering machines of viewers. The decision came after the network, known for aggressively seeking ... July 22, 2000, Saturday "

  162. Re:One way to stop the calls... by Ares · · Score: 1

    Get it here:

    sit.wav.

  163. Better than a boycott ... by Christianfreak · · Score: 1

    Sue them. Legally you can take any company to small claims court and get about $500 if you ask them not to call and they do it anyway. With such an automated system they will probably call you back and if enough people took it up ABC would most likely stop doing it.

    2 or 3 million viewers doing that and it could seriously hurt the company :). Not a bad idea of you ask me. Maybe we can get some of the "sheep-like" public away from their TVs for awhile!


    Never knock on Death's door:

  164. People call me 10 times a day and hang up by e_n_d_o · · Score: 1

    This is wildly offtopic, but while were on the subject of telecommunciations abuse, I'd love to here what the /. crowd thinks of this:

    I get 10 or so calls every 30 min to 1.5 hrs during business hours M-F at home. They hang out long enough to leave a blank message on my answering machine.

    So, um, WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?

    I'm about ready to get Ameritech's "privacy manager" to make this stop. (Hell, maybe Ameritech's DOING it to promote privacy manager though :P)

  165. Telemarketers by linuxonceleron · · Score: 2
    I'm sick of these bastards. They call and you're like "hello? hello?" for 20 seconds until it multiplexes you over to some idiot who is going to sell you stuff. Of course, they usually call for my parents and I end up interrogating them:

    Telemarketer: Hello, is Mr. Tosh there?
    Me: Yes he's here, what is this in relation to?
    Telemarketer: We'd like to sell him a...
    Me: He's got better things to do than talk to you.
    *click*

    I'd rather have messages on my machine, it only takes a second to delete if you've got a digial answerer and you don't have to go through the trouble of talking to the (often) moronic people on the line. However, what ABC is doing seems illegal, but I'm not sure on that, wonder if they got all the numbers off people sigining up for Who Wants to be a Millionaire?

    --

    Shine on, you crazy diamond.
  166. Which is more annoying.. Or Yet Another /. Poll by GW+Hayduke · · Score: 2

    So which would you rather deal with
    Telemarketers (yeah sure you give me YOUR home phone# and I'll call you when I'm free)

    Annoying Pauses wehn you DO answer the phone (I usually hang up on them immediately, or let them try to sell their product to my three year old who just LOOOVES to talk on the phone)

    or a telemarketer who hangs up when you answer (I agree with the above poster about that being a little disconcerting)

    well I guess they went the way of door-to-door salesmen... What's the next great Arthur Miller Spin off..... Death of a Telemarketer (Spammer)???

    --
    -- Life: Hate the Game... Love the cereal
  167. tele-solicitors by wishus · · Score: 3

    The answering machine is the big city where I live.. I get at least one call every day that is a hang up, and while I can't attribute all of those to this kind of marketing, I would venture to guess most of them are by the number of recorded solicitations that appear in my voicemail.

    I recently bought an answering machine with 3 separate mailboxes.. You have to push *2 or *3 to leave a message in boxes 2 or 3, but if you don't press anything it defaults to box 1. My friends and family know to press the "secret code" so I can easily discern between messages I want to hear and messages I probably don't.

    I toyed with the idea of charging for telephone solicitations, and even called a few companies back to get their mailing address so I could send them an invoice. Most of these were local businesses, horrified at the thought and instantly put me on their do-not-call list. I never followed through with the actual mailing of invoices, but no one called my bluff either.

    of course, someone will post the obligatory link to junkbusters' telemarketing script, but that doesn't really help with these machine calls, so i won't bother.

    wishus
    ---

  168. Oh man. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1
    Been up to 20 calls a day, and hang ups. And caller ID allways said Unknown Name, Unknown Number.
    We called and got everything blocked, our name put on all lists to be removed.
    This cut out 90% of the calls. The last few, we had to dial a number afterwords and do a trace.
    We then call the phone security (hah!) department, and have them open a complaint... Oh yeah, we have to pay for it!

    I can filter my email, Why cant I filter my Phonecalls!
    -Brook Harty

  169. Is there any protection from this? by b0z · · Score: 1
    I'm curious if there's any way to defeat something like this. I get my answering service from the phone company, and I don't like wasting my time to dial all those numbers to get my voicemail just to have it be a recording and/or telemarketer.

    I'd like to know if there's anything I can put at the front of my recording that might put these machines off. I guess this is probably more of a question for phone phreakers out there. I do wonder if anyone has taken the time to see how these machines work to differentiate between a human and answering machine.

    One possible solution I can think of is if the machines check for the beep, then I put a beep at the beginning of my greeting message, so the spam war dialer talks while I am, and doesn't leave a message.

    Any other ideas?

    --
    Mas vale cholo, que mal acompañado.
  170. but what if... by cdtoad · · Score: 1

    but what does it do if I'm ONLINE ALL THE TIME? Plus I don't own a TV! I realized how worthless commercial TV is and got rid of it. So call me if you want ABC you'll only be wasting your own money. Typical for a 2nd rate media whore

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
  171. Re:pound sixty by egburr · · Score: 1
    With SW Bell in TX, it costs $2 a month for this service, unless you have it as a piece of a package service.

    Furthermore, it only works when the number is reported. If the number is not shown on caller ID, it is not provided to the phone service to be blocked. This is generally only a problem with long-distance calls.

    Edward Burr

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  172. Awww fuck... by JakusMinimus · · Score: 2

    Now i gotta install portsentry on my goddamn answering machine. *pfffffffffffffffffft*

    --

    --

    You can be an atheist and still not want to succumb to some weird cross-over sheep disease -- AC
  173. There oughtta be a law by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    Even worse, the unidentified calls canNOT be traced using "call trace". I want to get an order forbidding these companies from calling me and hanging up, and the phone company will not tell me who they are!

    It is long past time for us to have the legal right to either get onto a company's do-not-call list the FIRST time they call (whether they get the answering machine or a human, and whether they have a marketer available to talk or not), or have some other means of rejecting advertising calls pre-emptively. It is also long past time for advertising companies to have to supply CLID information on all their calls, like all us normal schmucks. Anyone for a letter-writing campaign to Congress?
    --

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  174. You're letting the phone company scam you. by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    Why do you think "Privacy Manager" services are desirable? It's because the phone companies make them desirable; they are allowed to screw us, instead of shutting off the phone-spammers and being done with it. But that doesn't make them any more money...

    At first it was CLID that was supposed to deliver us from telescum. Now we need "Privacy Manager", because so many telescum refuse to provide CLID information. Someone mentioned that some phone companies are selling the equivalent of a privacy-manager-defeat to the telescum. I think it is high time for a class-action suit against any RBOC that has done such a thing, because they have represented their service as doing X and then gone right out and made it NOT do X, for a fee. This appears to fall into the category of "sharp practices", allowing triple damages. The amount of damages can start with the total amount all subscribers have ever paid for "Privacy Manager" services, and go up from there.

    After we have won on that, we can demand as part of the settlement that the RBOC's refuse to connect PBX's which do not send out a legitimate originating number and company name. Suddenly, Privacy Manager services become superfluous, telescum no longer have any way to hide, and people can enjoy their peace.
    --

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  175. true story by toolfann · · Score: 1

    lyng in bed one evening with a lady friend. phone rings. me:hello TM:is (someone that wasn't me) there? me:nobody by that name here. TM:that's ok, i'm calling from X-charity. do you want to donate? me:i already have.(lie) TM: i don't think you have sir. we don't have your name in our computers showing that you have. me:maybe becuase i haven't given you my name?you called for somone else remember? TM:oh...yeah...*gulp*...sorry... me:(click)

    --
    "learn to swim" - TOOL
  176. It could be a lot worse..... by bobdigi · · Score: 1

    In related News: Eminem and Dr. Dre are planning a similar ad campaign.

    --
    Yankees suck. yep you know it.
  177. Re:Federal law applies to ALL states by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5
    According to the Federal Trade Commission this would be an "Abusive telemarketing acts or practices" when a telemarketting person or devices doesn't provide the required oral disclosures aren't provided.

    The details are:

    (d) Required oral disclosures. It is an abusive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this Rule for a telemarketer in an outbound telephone call to fail to disclose promptly and in a clear and conspicuous manner to the person receiving the call, the following information: (1) The identity of the seller; ...

    Since the ABC telemarketing device (and I believe advertizing television shows still falls under telemarketing acts) will purposily fail to identify itself, I believe this is an attempt on ABC to intentionally conduct an "abusive telemarketing practice."

  178. Back when I was a modem user by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    While I was chatting with someone (Probably on icb, I don't think I was into irc at the time) I got call-nuked by a church's automated invitation service. Since then I've had an unreasoning hatred of schemes like this.

    Now if only there were a physical copper connection between them and me so I could run some wicked voltage to them...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  179. What's the problem? by dbthomas · · Score: 1
    "I'll have my machine call your machine to set up a time to watch TV."
    It sounds all too "1980's distopian view of the future" to me.
    If ABC wants to spend money leaving messages on my machine, fine by me. I would rather hit the "delete" key on the recorder than deal with a telemarketer.
    Now, the real genius advertising manuever would be to hack the caller ID screen to say, "watch Drew at 9!" so the recipients wouldn't even have to pick up the phone to get the ad into their heads.
    I can foresee the big hinderance to the plan will be when people who are home alone start getting all these hang-ups and get freaked out.

    --
    "These are the days that must happen to you." -Walt Whitman
  180. I called ABC by idlmx · · Score: 1

    I called ABC to complain about this pratice, but a human picked up, so I hung up, I only wanted to leave a message on the answering machine.

    --
    Time does not wait.